Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986 11-11 CC MINBook 67/Page 200 11 /11 /86 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA NOVEMBER 11, 1986 The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of National City was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Mayor Morgan. ROLL CALL Council members present: Cooper, Dalla, VanDeventer, Waters, Morgan. Absent: None. Administrative officials present: Bolint, Campbell, Eiser, McCabe, Post, Stafford. SALUTE TO THE FLAG AND INVOCATION The meeting was opened with salute to the flag led by City Manager McCabe, followed with invocation by the Rev. Robert Tigh, South Bay Bible Community Church. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Moved by Waters, seconded by VanDeventer, the minutes of the regular meeting of October 21, 1986 be approved. Carried by unanimous vote. PROCLAMATIONS Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, the Proclamations be read by title only. Carried by unanimous vote. The Proclamation declaring Tuesday, November 18, 1986 as "MAYORS' D—DAY IN THE WAR ON DRUGS" was presented. Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, in favor of this Proclamation. Carried by unanimous vote. The Proclamation declaring the week of November 17-22, 1986 as "WINTER PREPAREDNESS WEEK" was presented. Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, in favor of this Proclamation. Carried by unanimous vote. Mayor Morgan presented the Proclamation to Fire Chief Kimble. PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS GUSTAVO SLOVINSKY (Attorney), 281 Quintard, Chula Vista, was present and said he would like to speak for his client (Maria Moraleja), and inquired if her claim was on the agenda. Mr. Lavinsky was advised that the claim was on the agenda, and he could speak at that time. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT — CONFLICT OF INTEREST 1. SUBJECT: Continued Public Hearing — Applications for Conditional Use Permit No. 1986-08 and Planned Development Permit No. 5-86 to allow construction of a 54—unit motel and restaurant on property located within the 1600 block of Plaza Blvd., Southside, 150 feet East of Palm Avenue (Case File Nos. PD-5-86/CUP-1986-08 and 16/IS-86-22, Applicant: Lucky 8, A California General Partnership). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial based on the evidence set forth in opposition to required findings. Planning Director Post said the City Engineer has coordinated the preparation of the traffic evaluation, and has presented three alternatives for Council's consideration: 1. Lay the matter over for 45 days and authorize a complete traffic study to include specific recommendations, approximate cost $4,000 (A deposit in this amount should be required from the developer); 2. Approve the project on the condition that no improvement plans will be reviewed until the report mentioned in Item 1 is completed and its recommendation included in the plans; 3. Approve the project on the condition that a Covenant Running With the Land be processed, stipulating that the owner will not protest a future 1911 Act to construct traffic improvements; dedication of sufficient right—of—way along the Palm Ave. and Plaza Blvd. frontage to accomplish the improvements should be provided prior to issuing any construction permits; staff has outlined findings both in support and in opposition of the proposed project. Book 67/Page 201 1 1 /1 1 /86 TESTIMONY: Alfred Hlawatsch, 905 E. 13th St. (All issues have been reviewed except the traffic issue; he does not intend to raise the other issues unless Council wants to discuss them further; he spoke with the City Attorney who said he would give a brief statement and repeat what he had told the Planning Commission a month or so ago about what part of this project had been approved in the past and what hadn't; he [ Mr.Hlawatsch ] believes there was a conceptual approval, but not a specific approval.) Robert Sergeant, Traffic Engineer, Willdan & Assoc., 6363 Greenwich Dr., San Diego (Willdan & Assoc. prepared the traffic analysis for this project, and they have reviewed the comments submitted by B.S.I.; they stand by their initial report, and the basic conclusions reached in that; developm ent of this site with a motel and restaurant would not further deteriorate the levels of service as they exist today; they believe there are a number of inaccuracies in the B.S.I. report; the report indicates that the appropriate trip generation rate in the morning for the restaurant should be 29% of the traffic volum e, which is contrary to the suggested trip generation rates published by SANDAG, and is contrary to the City of San Diego; the July 29, 1986 memo from the City of San Diego clearly states that it should be 8%; the report also suggested that the intersection should be evaluated using a number of detailed factors; that type of analysis is usually reserved for specific evaluations of signals; to his knowledge that is used by only one City in the County; if the applicant were planning a new site with undeveloped land on both sides of Plaza Blvd., trying to space the intersections and driveways Is an admirable goal, but Plaza Blvd. is virtually built out; it is his opinion that the addition or deletion of one more driveway will have virtually no effect on Plaza Blvd.; Willdan & Assoc. used analytic methods, they have taken movement counts during the morning and evening peak hours, and have evaluated them; they stand by their previous recommendation that the addition of this project would not have any additional impacts to the intersection or the street segments in the vicinity of the project.) Alfred Hlawatsch (...asked the City Attorney to state for the record what he told the Planning Commission a month or six weeks ago when the question "Was this project in some form approved, in concept if not in actual detail?" was raised.) City Attorney Eiser said he believes there was a question raised about the number of units; he believes the applicant had submitted a request for approval of in excess of 54 units, and the question was whether or not the existing CUP was binding in terms of limiting the number of units to 54; he believes he made the statement that it was.) Alfred Hlawatsch (The traffic impacts for the original project were evaluated at the time the original project was approved; he believes Council agreed that the motels would not be occupied until the traffic modifications were made; those modifications were made, and the original people who started this project were required to contribute money for that modification; therefore, the share that would be attributable to his client's portion has already been paid by his predecessor; he would strongly urge Council to approve Alternative 2 or 3.) City Engineer Stafford said there is the chance that Plaza Blvd. should be widened; it was widened in front of the most recent addition to South Bay Plaza; under Alternatives 2 or 3, we should have the opportunity to look at the idea of widening for the eventual improvement of the intersection; if we had a turn —out lane for the 54— unit development, it would fit in with a future overall widening; when we review the improvement plans, we would have the opportunity to determine what the width should be, probably in the range of 10-12'. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Mayor Morgan said he would abstain because he owns Jimmy's Restaurant at Plaza and 805. TESTIM ONY: John Leffert, Civil Engineer, 8929 Complex Dr., San Diego (The distance in the range of 10-12' would reduce the separation of the pool from the curb from 25' to 10-15'.) ACTION: Moved by Waters, the public hearing be closed and the application for CUP and Planned Development Permit be approved, and all stipulations of staff be adhered to, and the additional one lane width be included in the plans. Motion died for lack of second. Moved by Cooper, seconded by VanDeventer, we hold this over until such time as Book 67/Page 202 11 /11 /86 the engineer and the Planning Dept. meet with these people and work out the details on widening Plaza Blvd. and Palm Ave. in that area. TESTIMONY: Alfred Hlawatsch (The widening of Palm is a whole new concept that has never been discussed before; his clients have instructed him to advise Council that they are willing to put in curbs and gutters on Plaza at this time; he thought the Euclid Ave. extension had pre— empted the problems on Palm; he would urge Council to allow his clients to move forward with his project while he still has the backing to do it. ACTION: Motion carried, by the following vote, to —wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, VanDeventer, Waters. Nays: None. Abstaining: Morgan. STREET VACATION/PORTIONS OF 21ST ST 2. SUBJECT: Public Hearing — Application for Vacation of portions of 21st Street between Wilson Avenue and the alley west of Wilson Avenue (Case File No. SC- 3-86, Applicant: City Initiated). RECOM MENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends vacation. Staff concurs with the Planning Com mission's recommendation, subject to the reservation of a public utility easement. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded by Dalla, the public hearing be closed, and the Planning Commission's recommendation be approved. Carried, by the following vote, to —wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, VanDeventer, Waters. Nays: Morgan. ZONE VARIANCE 3. SUBJECT: Public Hearing — City Council appeal of Planning Commission's approval of Zone Variance Application to allow access for development on a lot with no street frontage through a private easement extending approximately 40 feet to the lot from the southerly terminus of Casa Place (Case File No. Z-03- 86, Applicant: Pat Hart). RECOM MENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval. Staff recommends that a common access way to Euclid Ave. be provided for this parcel and adjacent City parcels once Euclid is completed. TESTIMONY: Virginia Berin, 1621 Casa Place (They have applied for two —single family homes, not a duplex; the access they are requesting would go through their own property; they have done everything that is required of them. ACTION: Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, the public hearing be closed and this request be approved. Moved by Dalla, seconded by Waters, the motion be amended to require two —car garages instead of carports. Amendment and motion carried by unanimous vote. LOT SPLIT — ZONE VARIANCE 4. SUBJECT: Public Hearing — Appeal of Planning Commission's denial of lot split (LS-7-85) for the division of property into four parcels; and Zone Variance Application (Z-8-85) to permit two lots with Tess than 50 feet of frontage on a public street and two lots with no street frontage, and three lots less than 50 feet in width, on property located at the east end of First Street between "L" and Laurel Avenues (Appealing Party: James L. Algert). RECOM MENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends denial, and staff concurs with the Planning Commission. TESTIM ONY: Jim Algert, 428 Broadway, Chula Vista (He feels the application has a lot of merit; it is a difficult site to develop; access would be a private driveway.) Mrs. Kerchin, 105 "L" Ave. (If Council allows four three —bedroom houses with two —car garages, there will be no room for anything; three houses would be okay; many of her neighbors are opposed as well, but were unable to attend tonight; it is a narrow street, and there would be excess traffic.) ACTION: Moved by Morgan, seconded by Waters, we approve this with garages required. Carried, by the following vote, to —wit: Ayes: Cooper, Waters, Morgan. Nays: Dalla, VanDeventer. Mayor Morgan called a recess at 8:25 p.m. Council reconvened at 8:30 p.m. Book 67/Page 203 11 /11 /86 ROLL CALL Council members present: Cooper, Dalla, VanDeventer, Waters, Morgan. Absent: None. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS CONSENT RESOLUTIONS (Resolutions Nos. 15,116 through 15,123) Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, the Resolutions be presented by title only, the Consent Resolutions (except No. 10) be adopted. Councilman Dalla announced he would vote against Item 10. Mayor Morgan said he would abstain on Item 10. Carried by unanimous vote. BUDGET FY86-87 — PARK/■Q" ST 5. Resolution No. 15,116, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATION AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT FOR "Q" STREET PARK." Adopted. See above. PARKING/TRAFFIC 6. Resolution No. 15,117, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ABOLISHING ONE ON —STREET HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE AT 1039 "C" AVENUE (LUTHER MYERS)." Adopted. See above. GRANT 7. Resolution No. 15,118, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE COMMUNITY PARKLANDS ACT OF 1986 FOR PROJECTS WITHIN THE CITY." Adopted. See above. PARKING/TRAFFIC 8. Resolution No. 15,119, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF ANGLE PARKING ON EAST SIDE OF TRANSPORTATION AVENUE FROM 28TH STREET TO 30TH STREET (TSC 86-92)." Adopted. See above. CONTRACT — CLAIMS/LITIGATION — COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 9. Resolution No. 15,120, "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REPAIR AGREEMENT." Adopted. See above. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT — ALCOHOLIC BEV LICENSE 10. Resolution No. 15,121, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL HOURS FOR THE SALE OF ALCOHOL FROM MIDNIGHT TO 2:00 AM, AND TO PERMIT LIVE ENTERTAINMENT THURSDAY THROUGH SATURDAY AS AN INCIDENTAL USE TO A RESTAURANT AT 105 EAST EIGHTH STREET (APPLICANT: MICHAEL DINI, CASE FILE NO. CUP-1986-10)." Adopted by the following vote, to —wit: Ayes: Cooper, VanDeventer, Waters. Nays: Dalla. Abstaining: Morgan. SPECIAL PERMIT/DRIVEWAY 11. Resolution No. 15,122, "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF A DRIVEWAY SPECIAL PERMIT AT 2020 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD (SHEA AND COLLET)." Adopted. See above. PARKING/TRAFFIC 12. Resolution No. 15,123, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DESIGNATING RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREA "F" ON "A" AVENUE BETWEEN 9TH STREET AND PLAZA BOULEVARD." Adopted. See above. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION (NOT A PART OF THE CONSENT AGENDA) Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Dalla, the Resolution be presented by title only. Carried by unanimous vote. PERSONNEL LABOR REL 13. Resolution No. 15,124, "A Resolution approving and revising Fiscal Year 1986-87 employee compensation plans." Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Dalla, in favor of the City Manager's original recommendation of 8.6% increase to the bands for Executives and mid —managers, and include the City Manager, the City Book 67/Page 204 11 /11 /86 Attorney, the Community Development Director, and Community Development mid -managers. This motion was not voted on. Moved by Cooper, seconded by Waters, Resolution No. 15,124 be adopted. Carried by unanimous vote. Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Waters, the action of October 28 be brought back for reconsideration, and the mid -management, City Manager, City Attorney, Community Development Director, Com munity Development mid -management, and Executives get 8.6% instead of 5.9%. Discussion to clarify the motion: City Manager, City Attorney and CDC Director to get 8.6%; mid -management to have their salary bands increased 8.6%. Carried, by the following vote, to - wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, Van Deventer, Waters. Nays: Morgan. Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Cooper, we direct the City Manager to do a study relating to fringe benefits and total compensation for the overall MEA, mid - management in January, so we have all that information before we come to next year's budget time. Councilman Waters said this year negotiations lingered on and on and on; there is a time that we should say two months is long enough; we ought to put a time limit so the management doesn't have to wait months to get their pay raises because a select few hold up the whole system; there should be a limited time that they can negotiate and get it to the City Council for consideration. City Attorney Eiser said there is an obligation under the law to meet and confer in good faith, and a requirement of that might be that the process takes as long as it would take to accomplish that; it might be possible to mutually agree on some type of time limit in the groundrules. Councilman Van Deventer said in the future, if the bargaining units have not settled by August 1, we go ahead and enact the mid -management and management and go on from there. Motion carried by the following vote, to - wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, VanDeventer, Waters. Nays: Morgan. ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION Moved by Dalla, seconded by Waters, the Ordinance be presented by title only. Carried by unanimous vote. MUNI CODE - ZONING 14. "An Ordinance amending Title 18 (Zoning) of the National City Municipal Code to permit the sale of non -automotive products in automotive service stations (Case File No. A-2-86)." NEW BUSINESS FINANCE MGIIIT 15. SUBJECT: WARRANT REGISTER NO. 17, Ratification of Demands in the amount of $32,733.19 (Warrants Nos. 94064 through 94118), and 16. WARRANT REGISTER NO. 18, Ratification of Demands in the amount of $165,943.58 (Warrants Nos. 94119 through 94188), and Certification of Payroll in the amount of $318,903.24. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the warrants be ratified. ACTION: Moved by Waters, seconded by Cooper, the bills be paid and warrants drawn. Demands ratified by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, Van Deventer, Waters. Nays: Morgan. Payroll ratified by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, Van Deventer, Waters, Morgan. Nays: None. CLAIMS LITIGATION 17. SUBJECT: Claim for Damages of Maria Moraleja (Niraleja), 18. Claim for Damages of Gloria Williams, and 19. Claim for Damages of Michele McCormock. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends these claims be denied and referred to the City Attorney. ACTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded by Van Deventer, these claims be denied and referred to the City Attorney. Carried by unanimous vote. City Attorney Eiser said he advised Attorney Slovinsky that he could come back and speak to Council, or he could speak to him; he (Mr. Eiser) will be meeting with Mr. Lavinsky. ALCOHOLIC BEV LICENSE 20. SUBJECT: Person Transfer of Type 41 Liquor License, on -sale beer and wine type license authorizing the sale of beer and wine for consumption on a bona fide public eating place type premises, plus the sale of beer and wine for consumption off the premises where sold; Applicant: Homa Alimardani, 2424 Hoover Street, Suite E, dba Lilian's Pizza Place. Book 67/Page 205 1 1 /1 1 /86 RECOMMENDTION: Police, Planning and Building Departments state no grounds for objection. ACTION: Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, this be approved. Carried, by the following vote, to —wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, VanDeventer, Waters. Nays: None. Abstaining: Morgan. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS CITY FACILITY/COMMUNITY BLDG — COMMUNITY PROMOTION 21. SUBJECT: Letter from the National City Centennial Committee requesting that the Lamb's Players be granted use of the Kimball Community Building evenings Monday thru Friday and all day Saturday, May 4 thru May 30, 1987 for rehearsals and June 1 thru June 13, 1987 for dress rehearsal and production for the Centennial Pagent and additionally request that the fees be waived. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded by Van Deventer, this be referred back to staff. Carried by unanimous vote. PARKING/TRAFFIC/SIGNALS 22. SUBJECT: Letter from Ms. Mary Daugherty, principal, Las Palmas School, concerning a dangerous situation at the intersection of 18th and Newell Streets. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded by VanDeventer, this be referred to the Traffic Safety Committee to come back with a recommendation. Carried by unanimous vote. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 23. SUBJECT: Letter from the National City Chamber of Commerce requesting use of the Kimball Community Building and kitchen facilities on Saturday, January 17, 1987 from 6:00 PM to midnight for their Annual Dinner Meeting. The Chamber also requests permission to serve alcoholic beverages. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded by VanDeventer, this be approved. Carried, by the following vote, to —wit: Ayes: Cooper, Dalla, VanDeventer, Waters. Nays: None. Abstaining: Morgan. POLITICAL SUPPORT 24. SUBJECT: Letter from Sheriff John Duffy requesting National City's support to the Foundation for Community Service Cable. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION: Moved by Dalla, seconded by VanDeventer, we prepare a Resolution as requested. Carried by unanimous vote. CITY FACILITY/GIRLS' CLUB 25. SUBJECT: Letter from the Girls Club of National City requesting an additional 55—year lease on their existing facility. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION: Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, in favor of this request. Carried by unanimous vote. BUDGET FY86-87 26. SUBJECT: Request for Donation from the Girls Club of National City to help purchase supplies for their programs. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION: Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, we donate $250. Carried by unanimous vote. BUDGET FY86-87 27. SUBJECT: Request for Donation from the Boys Club of National City to help support ongoing programs. RECOMMENDATION: None. ACTION: Moved by Cooper, seconded by VanDeventer, we donate $250. Carried by unanimous vote. BUDGET FY86-87 — CONFLICT OF INTEREST 28. SUBJECT: Request for Donation from the Central School to help defray the cost for some students to visit Camp Cuyamaca the week of June 8-12, 1987. RECOMMENDATION: None. Book 67/Page 206 11 /11 /86 ACTION: Moved by Waters, seconded by Cooper, we donate $250. Moved by Cooper, seconded by Waters, we amend the motion to give the money to the National School District or the camp for the benefit of all the schools, as a one—time donation. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Councilman Dalla said he would abstain because he is on the Education Foundation that deals with the camp. Councilman VanDeventer said he would abstain because he is the treasurer. ACTION: Motion carried by the following vote, to —wit: Ayes: Cooper, Waters, Morgan. Nays: None. Abstaining: Dalla, VanDeventer. OTHER BUSINESS ZONE VARIANCE — SIGN 29. SUBJECT: Notice of Decision — Planning Commission Resolution No. 52-86 approving an application for a zone variance to allow a second pole —mounted sign at 1130 Plaza Boulevard (Applicant: Nogle, Hawkins, Onufer & Associates, Inc., Case File No. Z-05-86). RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval, and staff concurs with the Planning Commission's approval. ACTION: Moved by Waters, seconded by Cooper, this be approved. Carried by unanimous vote. PARKING/TRAFFIC 30. SUBJECT: Manager's Report — Residential Permit Parking Area "F" on "A" Avenue between 9th Street and Plaza Boulevard. RECOM MENDATION: Staff recommends the report be accepted and staff directed to proceed. ACTION: Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Dalla, this be approved. Carried by unanimous vote. PARKING/TRAFFIC 31. SUBJECT: Report of the Traffic Safety Committee meeting of October 8, 1986. RECOM MENDATION: Staff recommends the report be received and filed. ACTION: Moved by Waters, seconded by VanDeventer, the report be approved. Carried by unanimous vote. SIGNS — COMMUNITY PROMOTION 32. SUBJECT: Report on Metallic "Welcome to National City" Signs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends 30 signs. ACTION: Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, we allocate funds for 60" signs, and transfer the funds from reserves. Carried by unanimous vote. BUDGET FY86-87 33. SUBJECT: Request for Donation to the Burn Institute. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the donation be made. ACTION: Moved by VanDeventer, seconded by Cooper, we donate $250. Carried by unanimous vote. CITY MANAGER — No report. CITY ATTORNEY — No report. OTHER STAFF — No reports. MAYOR Mayor Morgan spoke of Mrs. Koruga's sewer problem on La Siesta, saying she is 80— years old and unable to pay to fix the sewer line which is on a private easement. Public Works Director Williams said he does not have the authority to do the work on private property. Mr. Williams was asked to bring back a report next week, including costs. Mayor Morgan said he thinks the City should build a new Civic Center, and the best location would be on the corner of 16th & "D", across from the fire station, Boys' Club and Girls' Club; the City owns everything from 12th St. to 15th St.. Mayor Morgan asked the City Clerk to read into the record, his memo of November 10, 1986: Book 67/Page 207 11 /1 1 /86 "November 10, 1986 "To: City Manager "From: Mayor Morgan "Re: Break—in Into Mayor's Office "I cam e by the office last Friday night and it was apparent that someone had been in my office. This is disturbing to me since only my secretary and I have a key to this office. Please find out who it was. I am also going to speak to the Chief of Police in view of the fact that within the last 8 months, 1 have received two anonymous letters stating that someone else has keys to my office. "(s)Kile Morgan "Mayor "cc: City Attorney" CITY COUNCIL — No reports. ADJOURNMENT Moved by Dalla, seconded by VanDeventer, the meeting be adjourned to 4:00 p.m., November 18, 1986. Carried by unanimous vote. The meeting closed at 9:12 p.m. CITY CLERK The foregoing minutes were approved at the regular meeting of November 18, 1986. Corrections No c rections M'YOR CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 1