HomeMy WebLinkAbout1978 12-05 CC MIN51
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
DECEMBER 5, 1978
The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of National City was
called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Mayor Morgan.
ROLL CALL
Council members present: Camacho, Dalla, Van Deventer, Waters, Morgan.
Absent: None. Administrative officials present: Campbell, Gerschler,
Gill, Hoffland, McCabe, McLean.
SALUTE TO THE FLAG AND INVOCATION
The meeting was opened with salute to the flag led by City Manager Gill
followed with invocation by Chaplain Larry Beardsley, Paradise Valley
7th Day Adventist Church.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Moved by Waters, seconded by Camacho, the minutes of the regular meetings
of November 14 & 21, 1978 be approved. Carried by unanimous vote.
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
JIM GRAHAM, 1512 E Avenue, was present and spoke of the increase in crime
in the City saying part of the problem is a transient population; and he
requested that Council consider a noise abatement ordinance.
ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS
Moved by Camacho, seconded by Waters, these Resolutions be presented by
title only. Carried by unanimous vote.
Resolution No. 12,925, "Assuming partial tax liability of the Sweetwater
Water System Corporation." City Attorney McLean stated this Resolution
would be held over to next week.
Resolution No. 12,926, "RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK AND AUTHORIZING FILING
OF NOTICE OF COMPLETION (Fire Station Headquarters, Specification No.
879)." Moved by Waters, seconded by Van Deventer, Resolution No, 12,926
be adopted. Carried by unanimous vote.
Resolution No. 12,927, "RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT (Hoover Avenue &
Roosevelt Avenue from 18th Street to 2lst Street, Assessment District
No. 187)." Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Waters, Resolution No.
12,927 be adopted. Carried, by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes:
Camacho, Dalla, Van Deventer, Waters. Nays: None. Abstain: Morgan.
Resolution No. 12,928, "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING TRANSFER AND APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR 1911
ACT, DISTRICT NO. 187." Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Camacho,
Resolution No. 124228 be adopted. Carried, by the following vote, to -wit;
Ayes: Camacho, Dalla, Van Deventer, Waters. Nays: None. Abstain:
Morgan.
ORDINANCES FOR INTRODUCTION (first reading)
Moved by Camacho, seconded by Van Deventer, this Ordinance be presented
by title only. Carried by unanimous vote.
Ordinance No. 12/5/78-1, "Ordinance establishing a specific plan (SP-1-
78) for the location of street right-of-way for 24th Street, west of
Newell Street."
12/5/78
52
ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION (second reading)
Moved by Camacho, seconded by Waters, these Ordinances be presented by
title only. Carried by unanimous vote.
Ordinance No. 1653 (11/28/g8-I), "ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL CODE
SUBSECTION 18.30," 50 REGARDING MINIMUM ACREAGE FOR A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT." Moved by Camacho, seconded by Waters, Ordinance No. 1653
(11/28/;8-1) be adopted. Carried by unanimous vote.
NEW BUSINESS
The City Treasurer/Finance Director's request for RATIFICATION OF WARRANT
REGISTER NO. 20 dated December 5, 1978, in the amount of $204,710.66
(Warrants Nos. 63570 through 63609) was presented. Moved by Camacho,
seconded by Van Deventer, this be approved and warrants drawn. Carried,
by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Camacho, Dalia, Van Deventer,
Waters, Morgan. Nays: None.
Application for Type 47, ON -SALE GENERAL, EATING PLACE, LIQUOR LICENSE
from Elizabeth B. Flynn and James P. Jones, dba THE SANTA FE DEPOT, 900
W. 24th Street (staff recommends protesting until issuance of a condi-
tional license by ABC is assured; also permits sale of beer and wine for
consumption off the premises where sold) was presented. Moved by Waters,
seconded by Van Deventer, in favor of Item 12. € ed- r urranimous-
-vote- Carried, by the following vote to -wit: Ayes: amacho Dallas
Van beventer,Waters. Nays: None. Abstain: Morgan. (See 12712/78
Council minutes.)
Item 13, Application for Type 20, OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE from
Ramona D. Damian, dba AIROLITO GROCERY, 1643 Wilson Avenue, person
transfer; and
Item 14, Application for Type 20, OFF -SALE BEER AND WINE LICENSE from
The Southland Corporation, dba 7-ELEVEN #18978, 3100 Plaza Blvd., was
presented. Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Camacho, in favor of
liquor license applications 13 and 14. Carried, by the following vote,
to -wit: Ayes: Camacho, Dalia, Van Deventer, Waters. Nays: None.
Abstain: Morgan.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
The continued HEARING to consider several AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN,
GP-3-78, Part B which consists of Item 4, 8, 9, and 12; Part C, scheduled
for 12/12/78 consists of Items 5, .13, 14 and 15 was held at this time.
City Clerk Campbell stated the Certificate of Publication and Affidavit
of Mailing were on file; a protest was received from Daniel Gomez,832
E. 20th Street. Assistant Planning Director Gunnarson stated
the first item, Item 4, refers to the area that is bounded by 18th Street
on the north, "F" Avenue on the east, 20th Street on the south and the
properties along the west side of "I" Avenue on the west; this is now
shown on the General Plan for a residential density of 21-30; the proposed
change would reduce the density to a maximum of 10; the Planning
Commission recommends that this change be denied; there was a protest
petition representing 14 property owners within the area (signed by 29
prople) opposed to the change. Mr. Gunnarson stated within the area
there are 58 parcels: 29 of those, or half, are now developed with
apartments, 20 of them are developed as single family homes and 7 have
two family residences on them. DONALD CULVER, 1845 "I" Avenue, was
present and stated he opposes any zone change. Moved by Morgan,
seconded by Camacho, we go ahead and approve the Planning Commission's
recommendation. MR. ZUCHER, 1825 "J" Avenue, was present and stated he
opposes the change,in the General Plan as it is not compatible with any
other endeavors in this area. ROBERT BOHLER, owner of 20 units at 18th
and "J", was present and stated many peep le bought the property for
retirement purposes; the present structures in the area are well kept and
well maintained; this is not a blighted or slum area. Motion carried
by unanimous vote., 12/5/78
Item 8, (the area on the south side of 24th Street between "D" Avenue n
the west, "F" Avenue on the north and concerns only those properties
between 24th Street on the north and the extension of 25th Street on the
south -- the Planning Commission recommends approval of reduction in
residential density from 16-20 to 6-10 in this area, excluding the
commercial property at 220 - 24th Street.) Asst. Plan. Dir. Gunnarson
stated two protests were received for the properties at 330 and 340 E.
24th Street. JOYCE CIANO, 340 E. 24th Street, was present and stated
her sister owns the home at 330 E. 24th Street; they bought the properties
with the intention of putting a one bedroom apartment behind it for
future income and she does not want the zoning changed. Moved by Waters,
seconded by Morgan, Item 8 be approved as recommended by the Planning
Commission but delete the two parcels of property at 330 and 340 E. 24th
Street. Mr. Gunnarson stated at the Planning Commission hearing on this
item there was no indication from the neighborhood they would oppose a
change. Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Dalla, the motion be amended
to include all of them on that same street, if we're_coinc2- to make that
much of a spot -zone we should take into consideration those other two
pieces of property. Amendment carried by unanimous vote. Motion carried
by unanimous vote.
Item 9, (the adjoining area to the south between the extension of 25th
Street and 26th Street and "B" Avenue on the west, "F" Avenue on the
east; the current General Plan change is for a maximum density of 15; the
Planning Commission recommends in favor of reducing this area to a
maximum density 10 but excluding the properties along "B" Avenue on the
easterly side--2511 through 2543; there were protests at the time of the
hearing from those property owners; the Planning Commission took note of
the fact that directly across the street there is an apartment complex
and that the property to the north is a convalescent home.) DAVID
SCHAPIRO, 2511 "B" Avenues, was present and asked if his property was
excluded from this change and was advised it was. Mr. Schapii.- stated
when he bought the property 28 years ago it was R-4 and it was a
residential district; five years ago apartment houses started moving in;
he believes this is an "apartment -complex" area. ELDER HALL, 225 E.
26th Street, was present and stated lowering the density will cost him a
lot of money and will lower the value of his property. Mr. Gunnarson
stated current zoning allows for 11 units on Mr. Hall's property; after
the change, seven would be allowed. Moved by Camacho, seconded by Waters,
this gentleman that just spoke -- that his property be included with the
other three parcels that have been recommended by the Planning Commission
and all others adhere to the Planning Commission's recommendation and
close the hearing. Carried by unanimous vote.
Item 12, (the property on the south side of 18th Street between Lanoitan
and Granger Avenue; the proposal is to change this strip from Neighborhood
Commercial to "Residential 6-10 Dwelling Units Per Acre"; the change
would exclude the existing commercial property at 2602-04 18th Street
and 2744-54 18th Street; the change as recommended by the Planning
Commission would include both the store at 2602 E. 18th Street and the
single family home which is on one parcel.) Mr. Gunnarson stated if
Council excluded the area between La Siesta and Granger and rescheduled
that for the first hearing of 1979, they could proceed with the rest of
it so that the vacant properties within the area could be developed with
single family homes. Moved by Morgan, seconded by Waters, we go along
with the Planning Commission recommendation except the property next to
the business there and the one south on Granger next to the business.
TEDDY TAFOYA, 826 Ethel Place, was present, and stated she agreed with
the motion. Mr. Gunnarson stated the motion as he understands it would
exclude the properties at 2602-04 E. 18th Street, 2744 through 541 E.
18th Street, 2730 E. 18th Street, rrd 1810 Granger Avenue; the remaining
area between Lanoitan and Granger would be changed from Neighborhood
Commercial to Residential 6-10. Carried by unanimous vote.
Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Camacho, we continue the hearing to
7:45 p.m., December 12th. LLOYD MARLOW, 2320 "G" Avenue, was present
12/5/78
54
and asked if his area was or will be considered in the future. Mr.
Gunnarson stated the Planning Commission will hear this area at its first
meeting of 1979. Carried by unanimous vote.
The HEARING on APPEAL of Planning Department notice of INTENTION TO ABATE
AND REMOVE TWO INOPERATIVE VEHICLES as a public nuisance from property
at 714 Roosevelt Avenue, ZV-78-135, Louis Morales (the property owner
and vehicle owners were notified by certified letters date 11/14/78 that
the 59 Chevrolet and 65 Mercury located at 714 Roosevelt would be
removed by the City if not removed within 10 days of the receipt of said
notice) was held at this time. City Clerk Campbell stated the Notice of
Hearing was mailed to Mr. Morales and received by him. Planning Director
Gerschler, recommended this matter be filed. Moved by Camacho, seconded
by Van Deventer, in favor of the Planner's recommendation. No one was
present in this regard. Carried by unanimous vote.
The HEARING on appeal of "ORDER OF ABATEMENT" regarding use of property
at 29 W. 8th Street, HAROLD'S CLUB, ZV-78-144, Carmine J. Bua (the
premises at 29 West 8th Street had been used as a nightclub for over a
decade; the use was established prior to the City's adopting regulations
that require issuance of a conditional use permit for such use; an
"Order of Abatement" was served upon the owners and persons in possession
of the premises on 11/14/78; a timely appeal to this action was filed
with the Planning Department on 11/20/78; the Planning Commission after
hearing the appealing party at their meeting of 11/27/78 took action to
affirm the appealed decision; staff concurs with the Planning Commission
action; if the Order stands, the remedy will be for the owners of the
nightclub to file a conditional use permit application) was held at this
time. Planning Director Gerschlerp4statsgiWataff i ared to
�P
process a conditional use permit with dispatch. CARMINE BtJA/ Attor_. ay -
at -law, representing the Zieglers, was present and stated he previously
related the circumstances of the Zieglers who had come from New Jersey
and purchased the establishment and the problems they entertained with
their court situation, the fact that Mr. Bua had to petition the court
to move it up because the liquor license would expire. Mr. Bua stated
Council indicated to him that he was premature to the extent that the
Planning Commission would be the logical step to begin with; he made the
same presentation to the Commission relative to the time frame and
consequences; at that meeting the Commission focused on the fact of
whether or not there was a 12-month period in which the business was not
operated.which brought into play the application of the conditional use
permit; he explained the circumstances which involved a court hearing;
everything that was humanly possible was done to accelerate a resolution
of the problem; the resolution of which was that the previous owner (Mr.
Harold Dodds) who had operated the business for a long time was going to
take the license back which would resolve the Zeigler's debt in the
amount of $150,000; he had gone to the ABC and told them the same things
that he has related to Council in this ,matter, and they granted an
extension which would keep their liquor license viable; he is now asking
Council to consider a waiver of some sort from the application of that
statute to this particular situation; the reason they have not gone
directly to the Planning Commission is the time factor and the pressure
that has been imposed on the Zieglers by the ABC to resolve the matter;
if the situation is allowed to return to where it was, the Zieglers will
not be wiped out financially; there is a time frame that is compelling;
he has alerted the ABC of their problem and they are reasonably
sympathetic but they suggested that the Zieglers try to get a waiver;
nothing is really going to change, it will be the same owner as before
and the same operation; the circumstances of the Zieglers are such that
they would appreciate Council's consideration of a waiver of the
conditional use permit. Moved by Morgan, we refer this to the Planning
Commission and then take action. Discussion. CITY ATTORNEY MCLEAN
stated that Mr. Dodds called his office and in essence said that he had
no interest in pursuing any attempt to rehabilitate or renovate the
property and bring it up to current standards if he were the occupant.
12/5/78
55
JOHN RONIS, 1515 Highland Avenue, attorney for Mx. Dodds, was present and
stated he knew nothing about the call but Mr. Dodds is not the owner of
the property, he was the tenant and the lease was assigned to the
Zieglers he would take it back to let them off the hook. Councilman
Van Deventer asked Mr. Ronis if the conditions that would be required
under a Conditional Use Permit were part of the condition of letting it
go as it is now, what would be his intentions with the property. Mr.
Ronis stated he would operate it as he used to. City Attorney McLean
stated that that hasn't been a problem, right now they are appealing
the decision of the planner that they don't have a non -conforming right
any more; if Council overrules the Planner and says yes, they have a
non -conforming right they can go back and keep on doing what they are
doing; if, on the other hand, you sustain the action of the Planning
Commission saying you don't have a non -conforming right, they have a
choice to make, either file for a Conditional Use Permit and see what
happens; or, they can say you're all wrong and go to court. Mr. Ronis
stated Mr. Dodds is willing to help the people out in this situation,
but he isn't interested in operating it; he is not interested in going
out and getting another liquor license. Mr. Ronis stated that basically
Mr. Dodds is saying that he'll take the business back if he doesn't have
to spend any more money. Discussion. City Attorney McLean stated the
problem is that until these people come in and apply for the use permit,
Council cannot respond to what they can or can't do. Moved by Morgan,
seconded by Dalla, we adopt the Planning Commission's recommendation on
this hearing. Councilman Dalla stated that Mr. Bua's client is in a
most unfortunate circumstance; it would be easy to avoid the whole thing
and walk away from it, but we have a greater responsibility. Carried,
by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Della, Van Deventer, Morgan.
Nays: Camacho, Waters.
The HEARING on RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 12,867, alley between National
City Boulevard and 2nd Street to Roosevelt Avenue, Assessment District
No. 198 was held at this time. City Clerk Campbell stated no written
protests were received and the Affidavit of Mailing and Certificate of
Publication were on file. ROBERT ONLEY, Civil Engineer Associate, was
present and displayed a map showing the exterior boundary of the district
and the proposed improvement area. Mr. Onley said he looked at each
parcel in the District and finds that the proposed assessment is
beneficial to the parcels as assessed; the estimated cost of construction
is $12,172.70; total incidental expenses, $2,295.00; total assessment,
$14,467.70; total City contribution, $1,620.00; total amount to be
assessed, $12,347.70. No one was present in this regard. Moved by
Camacho, seconded by Waters, this hearing be closed on Resolution of
Intention No. 12,867 to pave the alley between National City Boulevard
to 2nd Street and adhere to all the Planning Commission's recommendations.
Carried by unanimous vote.
NEW BUSINESS
Item 15, ELECTRO INDUSTRIES, INC.'S request to occupy a MOBILE OFFICE
TRAILER on a temporary basis (Electro Industries performs electrial and
electronic services for the U.S. Navy; an increased work load has
created the need for additional temporary office facilities for a period
of approximately 10 months; the company has, therefore, requested
authorization to occupy a California state approved mobile office
trailer; a Temporary Use Permit for this has been processed and approved
by the Police Department, Fire Department and Planning Department;
staff recommends approval subject to the following terms and conditions:
ri] the Temporary Use Permit shall expire on October 31, 1979; r2] the
mobile unit and its use shall comply with all City and State minimum
requirements for a temporary office occupancy) was presented. Moved by
Camacho, seconded by Van Deventer, this request be granted. Carried by
unanimous vote.
Staff's recommendation Council continue support of the SWEETWATER RIVER
FLOOD CONTROL/HIGHWAY 54 PROJECT (the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will
hold a public hearing on the Sweetwater River Flood Control/Highway 54
- 3 '�f 12/5/78
1s.'y.4=404143'
56
Project on December 7, 1978, Item 16; staff recommends Council forward
to subject public hearing a response and recommendation as follows: [1j
full support for the projects, with completion as soon as possible; 2 '
reiteration of past committments made by the City for participation and
support; [3] restatement of the City's needs and:interests expressed
previously by Council Resolutions 8,882, 11,744 and 11,972; [4] insis-
tence that the several.components of the project dealing with flood
control, freeways, connecting roads, preservation of the fishing pier
and boat launching ramp, recreation facilities including the "Beach
Park", hiking and riding trails and equestrian facilities all be
included in the initial project; [5] reference to National City's adopted
General Plan, zoning map, highway plans, capital improvement program,
floodplain management program and long-range land use programs,
recognition and reliance upon the subject project; and, that without the
completion of this project both private and public investment would be
jeopardized in a manner that could be devastating to the local economy,
posing real and substantial threats to public health and safety; [6]
urging the U.S, Congress to implement this project with the authorization
of funds and procedural steps at the earliest possible time) was presented.
Moved by Camacho, seconded by Van Deventer, we follow staff's recommend-
ation on Item 16. Carried by unanimous vote.
OTHER BUSINESS
PLANNING
The Planning Commission's report on request for WAIVER FROM REQUIREMENT
OF UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE in conjunction with the development
of a commercial building at 1315 Coolidge Avenue, Charles G. Wendt
(a building permit authorizing construction of the subject single story,
800 square foot building was issued by the Building Department 6/22/78;
this building is located on a 25 x 115' lot, between 13th and 14th
Street, east side of Coolidge; the entire block bounded by 13th Street,
14th Street, Hoover and Coolidge Avenues, is developed for residential
use; zoning is Light Industrial; the proponent advised that the only
available electrical power source is located on the opposite side of
the street; this area is not designated as an underground area by the
S.D. Gas & Electric Company; therefore, the entire cost of bringing the
power to the lot is to be borne by the owner; the estimate by the San
Diego Gas & Electric Company to do this undergrounding is $1,500; SDG&E
has no plans at this time to underground the power in this area; the
Planning Commission and staff recommend denial of the request; the City
has consistently enforced the undergrounding law; that work is often
expensive but necessary to carry out the long-range objectives of under -
grounding) was presented. Moved by Camacho, seconded by Morgan, in favor
of this request. Carried, by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes; Camacho,
Van Deventer, Waters. Nays: Dalla, Morgan,
PLANNING COMMISSION - NOTICES OF DECISION
Item 18, Resolution No. 95-78, approving application for ZONE VARIANCE to
allow a REDUCTION IN THE NUMBER OF OFF-STREET PARKING SPACES from 15
spaces to 14 spaces in conjunction with development of a shopping center
containing 4,775 square feet at 3100 E, 8th Street, Z-21-78;
Item 19, Resolution No. 96-78, approving application for PLANNED DEVELOP-
MENT PERMIT to allow development of a COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER
containing a gross floor area of 4,775 square feet at 3100 E. 8th Street,
PD-118;
Item 20, Resolution No. 98-78, DENYING an application for PLANNED DEVELOP-
MENT PERMIT to allow development of a 40-unit CONDOMINIUM PROJECT on the
east side of "R" Avenue between 4th Street and 7th Street, PD-122; and,
Item 21, Resolution No. 99-78, approving application for CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT to allow a state licensed DAY CARE CENTER for 12 children, to be
operated in conjunction with the existing YMCA Family Stress Center at
3142 Plaza Blvd., suites "L" and "M", on property located at 3142 Plaza
Blvd., Suite "N", CUP 1978-27. Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by
Camacho, they be filed. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes:
Camacho, Van Deventer, Waters, Morgan. Nays: Dalla,
12/12/78
57
STREET TREE AND PARKWAY COMMITTEE
Recommendations from the STREET TREE AND PARKWAY COMMITTEE'S meeting of
November 16, 1978:([1] remove one Phoenix Palm from 1341 Coolidge, G.A.
Delgado; [2] remove one Tristania Conferta from 3228 Menard Street,
M.A. Guaderrama; [3] remove one California Pepper tree from 520 "I"
Avenue, Mr. Hall; [4] request from Mr. Jaime Miranda, 1224 E. 24th Street
to remove two California Pepper trees denied, the trees will be trimmed;
[5] remove one Braziliian Pepper tree from 502 "M" Avenue, Gabriel
Pineda; [6] remove one Tristania Conferta from 3236 Menard Street, Mrs.
Maria Urbano; [7] request from Mrs, Karl Welsbacker, 1005 E. 6th Street
to remove one Phoenix Palm denied) was presented. Moved by Camacho,
seconded by Van Deventer, in favor of the recommendations, Carried by
unanimous vote.
CITY MANAGER - No report
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY ATTORNEY MCLEAN recommended Council authorize him to file suit
against the Carver Corporation to enforce their provisions of their
contract with the City concerning sewer construction. Moved by Camacho,
seconded by Van Deventer, in favor of the City Attorneys recommendation.
Carried by unanimous vote.
OTHER STAFF
PLANNING DIRECTOR GERSCHLER stated under Item 12 on the Agenda he failed
to point out that there was a memorandum that changed the Planning Dept.
recommendations on the Liquor License for the Ee)ot and he wanted the
record to show that their recommendation is as setforth in their memo-
randum of 12/4/78.
MAYOR
MAYOR MORGAN recommended that Council raise the hotel/motel occupancy
tax to 8% because that is what it is in Chula Vista and San Diego. Moved
by Van Deventer, seconded by Camacho, in favor of the Mayor's recommend-
ation. Discussion. Carried, by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes:
Camacho, Dalla, Van Deventer, Morgan. Nays: Waters.
CITY COUNCIL
COUNCILMAN VAN DEVENTER recommended an increase in the BUSINESS LICENSE
FEE FOR LUNCH WAGONS; it isn't fair to the business community of the City
to let outsiders come in and penalize the people who are in the City.
Moved by Van Deventer, seconded by Camacho, this be raised from $20.00 to
$100.00 a year. Moved by Dalla, seconded by Waters, this item be tabled
for one week. Carried by unanimous vote.
COUNCILMAN WATERS spoke of the condominium development at 12th and "D";
there is a LACK OF OPEN SPACE in the project and we don't need that in
the City.
COUNCILMAN DALLA stated at last Council meeting the proposed REFUSE PLANT
was approved in concept; perhaps his comments at the time were not clear;
for the record, he does not support in concept or otherwise the location
of thetrash facility in the City. COUNCILMAN WATERS stated he agreed.
Moved by Morgan, seconded by Camacho, the meeting be closed. Carried by
unanimous vote. The meeting Close -at :55 s.m.
CITY CT RR
CITY NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
The foregoing minutes were approved by the City
e,
EDCorrections (/ 3
cil on Dec. 19, 1978,
cor ections
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
12/5/78