HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012 05-22 CC HA ADJ MINBook 94 ! Page 115
05-22-2012
MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
— HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
FY 2012-2013 BUDGET WORKSHOP
May 22, 2012
The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community
Development Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City was
called to order at 6:04 p.m. by Mayor / Chairman Ron Morrison.
ROLL CALL
Council / Board members present: Morrison, Natividad, Rios, Sotelo-Solis,
Zarate.
Administrative Officials present: Dalla, Deese, Duong, Gonzales, Manganiello,
Norrdin, Parra, Raulston, Silva, Smith, Stevenson, Vergara, Williams, Ybarra.
Others present: City Treasurer Mitch Beauchamp and Student Representatives
Aileen Horta and Leemaylin Avila.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY MAYOR RON MORRISON
BUDGET WORKSHOP
1. City Manager Leslie Deese presented opening remarks on the FY 2012-
2013 Preliminary Budget, reviewed the planned agenda and introduced
individual staff members Alfredo Ybarra, Manuel Rodriguez, Stacy
Stevenson, Tina Norrdin, Brad Raulston, Joe Smith, Steve Manganiello,
Claudia Silva and Frank Parra who made individual presentations on the
below listed topics. NOTE: All presentation materials are attached. See
Exhibit "A".
2. Economic Outlook
California
National City
Significant Accomplishments
City Budget Overview
General Fund Budget
Capital Improvement Projects, (CIP) Budget
Successor Agency Budget (CDC -RDA)
Preview of Fiscal Year 2013-2014
Next Steps
Book 94 / Page 116
05-22-2012
BUDGET WORKSHOP (cont.)
2. Economic Outlook (continued)
City Manager Closing Comments & Recommendations
Community Input
City Council Comments and Direction
3. Public Comments
TESTIMONY: Richard Wingfield, National City, thanked the Council
for their efforts to improve Butterfly Park.
Geoffrey Schrock, National City, offered suggestions on how to
save energy and fuel costs.
Carolina Martinez, Environmental Health Coalition, emphasized to
the Council the importance of amortization.
City Treasurer commented on the prospects of the Nutrition Center
becoming more self-sufficient and the need to start promoting
retention of the one cent district tax.
4. Council Direction/Comments
Council Member Natividad thanked the staff for all their hard work and
suggested that now is a good time for the Mayor and Council to go on a
retreat and develop a vision for the City.
Vice Mayor Sotelo-Solis thanked staff, suggested that we look at the Mile
of Cars for fuel efficient vehicles, asked that the 125th Anniversary
Committee and the plan for Butterfly Park be placed on a future agenda
and said she supports the $50,000 allocation for amortization.
Council Member Rios said she supports the idea for a retreat, encouraged
Council members who serve on Ad Hoc committees to report back,
commended staff for their presentations and hard work and spoke in
support of the wellness program and funding for amortization.
Council Member Zarate said she takes pride in how the City has
improved, is pleased with the great job done in the Capital Improvement
Projects, congratulated Alfredo Ybarra for the recognition from HUD, said
she hopes we will be able to use the proceeds from the bond sale and
thanked staff for their work.
Mayor Morrison thanked the staff, said it was a good budget even though
there is a great deal of uncertainty and said he supports the specific
funding items recommended by the City Manager.
Book 94/Page 117
05-22-2012
BUDGET WORKSHOP (cont.)
4. Council Direction/Comments (continued)
ACTION: Motion by Natividad, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to
approve transfer of $558,028 from Reserves to General Fund and
approve the City Manager's funding recommendations of $70,000
for the Wellness Program, $15,000 for the 125th Anniversary,
$5,000 for the South County Economic Development Committee,
$5,000 for the Chamber of Commerce, $100,000 for property
management and $50,000 for Amortization. Carried by unanimous
vote.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion by Rios, seconded by Zarate, to adjourn the meeting to the next Regular
Meeting of the National City City Council and Community Development
Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City to be held Tuesday,
June 5, 2012 at 6:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers, National City, California.
Carried by unanimous vote.
The meeting closed at 8:39 p.m.
The foregoing minutes were approved at the Regular Meeting of December 4,
2012.
Mayor
CA41P4NIA '-'-
NkTIONAILOCITY
CF
ACOYH .01mrrfl
Th
PRELIMINARY BUDGET
PRESENTATION
FY 2012-2013
May 22, 2012
Presentation Agenda
• Background
• Economic Outlook
— California
— National City
• Significant Accomplishments
• City Budget Overview
— General Fund Budget
• Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) Budget
• Successor Agency Budget (CDC -RDA)
• Preview of Fiscal Year 2013-2014
• Next Steps
• City Manager Closing Comments & Recommendations
• Community Input
• City Council Comments & Direction
2
EXHIBIT 'A'
Background
• In 2004, City Council priorities were public
safety, technology, fiscal clarity, community
engagement and image
• In 2005, City Council added overarching goal of
fiscal sustainability with focus on General Fund
• In 2006, National City reached a severe financial
fork in the road — survive or thrive was the
question
— Citizens and businesses responded by supporting a
temporary sales tax of 1 %
3
Background
• In 2007, City completed and implemented 5-
Year Strategic Plan — as a result, National City is
a more vibrant and safer place
• In 2008, after four consecutive years of saving
money, City built contingency reserves to a high
of $9 million from $4.2 million in 2005
• In 2009, with economy heading downward and
costs escalating, City used $1.5 million in
contingency reserves to balance budget
4
Background
• In 2010, staff provided CARE ideas, financial
trending and short-term recommendations to
close FY 2009-10 estimated budget gap of $3.3
million (at mid -year)
• In 2011, $4.5 million budget deficit closed in part
by operational reductions, voluntary separation
program and slightly higher than projected
revenues. Contingency reserves were not needed
• With this background, tonight we are presenting a
preliminary budget for FY 2012-13
5
California's Economic Outlook
• Economy improving but at a very slow pace
• The housing market is recovering slowly
— Home sales have increased
— Notices of default have declined
— The median sales price of existing single family
homes is up 8.4%
• The recovery of jobs lost during the Great
Recession is forecasted for 4th quarter of
2015 (previous forecast 2nd quarter of 2016)
7
mffeitifn Governor's May Budget Revision
• Estimates a budget deficit of $15.7B, up from the
original projection of $9.2B
— Prior revenue forecast was too high ($4.3B)
— Higher costs to fund schools ($2.4B)
— Federal government and Courts blocked proposed budget
cuts ($1.7B)
• Assumes passage of the Governor's November
2012 Tax Initiative
— Estimated to bring in approximately $8.5B
— Temporarily increases tax rates on highest income
Californians
— Temporarily increases Sales and Use Tax rate by 0.25%
8
Governor's May Budget Revision
• Legislative Analyst's Office reports there may
be approximately $1 B less in revenue
— Assumes $1.4B in monies left from defunct
redevelopment agencies
— Failed to recognize legal obligations of former
RDAs
• State's budget problems historically effect
local government negatively
9
Governor's May Budget Revision
• Local impact will be seen in Tax Increment
and Low/Mod Housing funding
— "Creating a framework to transfer cash assets
previously held by redevelopment agencies to
cities, counties and special districts to fund core
public services. Assets transferred to schools will
offset General Fund costs." (savings of $1.4B)
From the Governor's Budget May Revision
• National City impacts are uncertain due to
ROPS not being certified by County/State
10
TANational City Today
• Weathering worst economic climate since
Great Depression
• Clean financial audits of City, CDC and
Federal Awards
• City's Standard & Poors Rating is A
• CDC's Standard & Poors Rating is A-
• Limited General Fund Debt
• Continuous review of operating costs and
seeking revenue enhancements
11
Unemployment Rates
• U.S. - 8.1%
• California -10.9% (lowest mark in 3 years)
• 2012-13 California rates expected to decline
below 10%
• San Diego County — 8.7% (lowest mark in 3
years)
• National City -18.2%
(All figures are as of April, 2012)
12
National City Today
• Bradley Burns Sales Tax Not Fully Recovered
— High of $16.5 million in 2004
— Low of $8.7 million - 2010
— Projection for 2012 - $9.9 million
• Proposition "D" District Sales Tax Stable
— $7 - $9 million projection on target
• Outside funding sources are being reduced
13
•
sof
National City Today
• Fiscal Impacts
— Federal budget actions lead to a 21% reduction in
CDBG program funding and a 55% reduction in
HOME Investment Partnerships program funding
for National City
• Future impacts uncertain due to dissolution of
California redevelopment agencies
• National City continues to make significant
strides to cut costs, become more efficient and
enhance revenues in challenging times
14
Significant Accomplishments
FY 2011-2012
Manuel Rodriguez
15
Significant Accomplishments
FY 2011-12
• Reduction in Crime Rate
• Violent crime down 13%
• Property crime down 2%
• Overall crime down 4%
(data based on 2011 statistics)
• Completion of Proposition "D" Independent
Committee Sales Tax Report
— Committee Recommendation was that National
City continue its use of a one -cent sales tax
increase approved by the voters in 2006
16
Significant Accomplishments
FY 2011-12
• Increased community partnerships with non-profit
service providers by creating and maintaining
activities that support the needs of National City
families
• Increase daily average attendance at the Senior
Nutrition Center ($44,488 increase in grant funds)
• Additional $2,235,107 in HOME program income and
$531,765 in CDBG program income was recovered
• Energy Retrofit Program achieved 6% more than
estimated savings ($129,343)
17
Significant Accomplishments
FY 2011-12
• Completion of El Toyon multi -use field
• Named an American Star Library by the Library
Journal Index of Public Library Service for the third
year in a row
Housing & Grants, Section 8 named high performing
agency by HUD
• Agreement with Chandler Asset Management and
County of San Diego to provide Investment
Management Services
• Effectively changed banks for City and CDC:
transitioned from two separate banks to one
18
n.. p
C1t887
FY 2012-13 City Budget
Stacey Stevenson
19
Overall City Budget
• Total Expenditures by Fund - $95.12M
All Other Funds,
$8.10
Internal Services
Funds, $19.73
2011 TAB - Capital
Improvements,
$902
Low/Mod Housing,
$8.02
Section 8, $9.87
General Fund,
$39.13
ibrary Fund, Si 77
J
Gas Taxes Fund,
Sewer Serene $1.73
Fund, $8.95
20
NATI 1 � b •Cr
FY 2012-13 General Fund Budget
Stacey Stevenson & Tina Norrdin
21
Preliminary FY 2012-13
General Fund Summary
Estimated Revenue* $38,450,538
Estimated Expenditure** $39,008,566
Estimated Surplus/(Deficit) ($558,028)
*includes transfers in
**includes transfers out
22
General Fund Revenue and Expenditure
Forecast
-Revenues Less District Tax
Revenues with District Tax
$20
-Expenditures
23
"Te*:-:A7P
General Fund
- Revenue
Projected Year-
End Actual
(2011-2012)
2012-2013
Projection
Sales Tax
$ 9,910,824
$ 10,567,101
Prop D District Tax
$ 9,052,000
$ 9,410,000
Property Tax
$ 1,508,472
$ 1,537,243
Property Tax in Lieu of VLF
$ 4,931,254
$ 4,931,260
Property Tax in Lieu of Sales tax
$ 3,403,217
$ 3,522,366
Other Revenue
$ 6,807,779
$ 8,482,568
Total
$ 35,613,546
$ 38,450,538
24
National City Sales Tax
• Bradley Burns Sales Tax revenues up 5.8
percent over same period last year
— October through December 2011 sales
— Sales tax revenue lags by approximately
three months
• Auto sales, fuel and new businesses
added to revenue flow
• Prop D District Sales Tax revenues up 2.4
percent over same period last year
25
Bradley Burns Sales Tax and
District Sales Tax
■ Sales Tax ■ District Tax
General
Fund - Expenditures
-.--�"`
FY 2011-12
Adopted
FY 2012-13
Preliminary
Change
Personnel
$25,772,224
$25,930,382
$158,158
M & 0
$4,425,513
$3,883,736
($541,777)
Capital
$5,000
$690,000
$685,000
Internal
Charges
$6,707,480
$6,467,389
($240,091)
Transfers Out
$1,430,884
$2,157,671
$726,787
Total General
Fund
$3,8341,101
$39,129,178
$788,077
27
---�--` Significant General
Fund Impacts
Staffing absorbed from Tax
Increment
$1.5M
Fire Wellness Program
$45k
City-wide Wellness Program
$25k
Elections
$35k
125th Anniversary Funding
$15k
28
Wrr
General Fund Impacts
• Redevelopment
— 17.95 FTE's previously funded by Tax Increment have
been absorbed by the General Fund
— Successor Agency administrative allowance allocated to
cover percentage of salary for positions directly supporting
Successor Agency. Funding for administrative allowance
uncertain
— Staff time for capital projects will be reimbursed
• Employee Benefits
— Health care rates increased 4.2% (increase shared equally
by employees and City)
— Retirement costs: 0.288% increase for miscellaneous
employees; 1.013% decrease for public safety employees
• Internal Service Charges Updated
29
Staffing Levels All Funds
FY 2011-2012
FY 2012-2013
Net Change
FTEs
375.79
369.52
(6.27)
30
General Fund Percentage of
Expenditure by Department
Fire
*Police 52.2%
*Fire 18.8%
*Others 29.0%
-City Attorney
-City Clerk
-City Council
-City Manager
-City Treasurer
-Comm. Development
-Comm. Services
-Development Services
- Public Works
- Non Departmental
General Fund Reserves
Beginning Fund Balance projected at $13.5M
• Contingency Reserve /
Undesignated Balance
• Committed
• Assigned
$7,059,792
$1,671,257
$4,829,800
32
General Fund Reserve Policy
General Fund Policy: ... range between 25% and 50%
of a single year's General Fund operating
expenditures
• FY 2012-13 estimated General Fund expenditures =
$ 39,129,178
• Contingency Reserve projected at $7M
33
12
10
8.2
s-
6
0
General Fund
Contingency Reserve
9.4 9'7 9.4
11111i2
18.7
I I
9.8
03/04 04/05 05/06 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13
MI Reserve —*-25% Goal
34
Reserve Fund Policy
• Council Policy 201, Maintenance of Reserve
Funds
— Contingency
• General Fund
• Gas Tax Fund
• Sewer Service Fund
— Liability Insurance
— Workers' Compensation
— Debt Service
— Equipment Replacement Reserve
36
Reserve Fund Policy
• Council Policy 201, Maintenance of Reserve
Funds
— Equipment Replacement Reserve: "An amount equal
to the accumulated depreciation of the replacement
value of the motor vehicle fleet."
Current Fund
Balance
Transfer in*
New Fund
Balance
$ 242,080
$ 575,342
$ 817,422
*Transfer in is from the Motor Vehicle
Service Fund
37
NAT
1887.
Capital Improvement Program
and Bond Update
Brad Raulston & Steve Manganiello
38
g ► Capital Improvement Program
• Five-year Budgeting Process for Establishing
Capital Priorities
— Approximately $120 million in capital needs
identified over the 2011-2016 period
— Housing projects were included in the CIP with a
total of $59 million in needs identified
— Approximately 40 Capital Projects are currently
"active" with approximately $40 million in funds
available
— Funding sources for Capital Projects often have
restrictions (scope, timeline for expenditures, etc.)
39
Capital Improvement Program
• Capital Priorities were Established through
Criteria Based Evaluation, Community Input
and Long -Range Planning
— Key criteria considered: health & safety, project
costs & funding, Community support, General Plan
consistency, & on -going maintenance costs
— General Plan Update was completed in 2011 and
provided blueprint for public improvements
throughout National City
— Projects were also derived from other Tong -range
planning efforts such as the City's Strategic Plan
and Specific Area Plans
40
W IJf-.
ar
2011 Tax Allocation Bond
• CDC Sold Approximately $40 million in
Redevelopment Bonds in 2011
— $34 million available after issuance costs and
reserves
— $15 million for Housing and $19 million for Capital
Improvements
— Provides major funding for CIP, but is restricted to
Redevelopment Project Area
• Proceeds must be Committed within 3 Years
41
NI:1W,, 2011 Tax Allocation Bond Projects
• Housing
— WI-TOD (Westside Infill Transit Oriented Development)
• Phase I: 109 homes for deserving families; new neighborhood park
with active and passive recreation to compliment Paradise Creek
• Phase II: 92 homes for deserving families
• Project requires relocation of Public Works
• Economic Development
— SR-54 Gateway Project (Derr/Sudberry Development)
• Quality of Life Facilities, Parks & Recreation
— Kimball Park Improvements
— Las Palmas Park Improvements
— Aquatic Center
42
2011 Tax Allocation Bond Projects
• Community Corridors
— 8th Street Smart Growth Revitalization
(Harbor Drive to Highland Avenue)
— 8th Street Safety Enhancements
(Highland Avenue to Palm Avenue)
— Highland Avenue Safety Enhancements
(Division Street to 8th Street)
— Coolidge Ave Community Corridor
(Plaza Boulevard to 18th Street)
— D Avenue Community Corridor / Roundabout (12th Street)
(Division Street to 30th Street)
— 4th Street Community Corridor
(Roosevelt Avenue to Harbison Avenue)
43
2011 Tax Allocation Bond Projects
Capital Improvement Protects
2011 Tax Allocation Bond (TAB) Spending Plan
Fiscal Year 2012-2016
Budget Budget Budget Budget Budget
FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 13.14 FY 14-15 FY 15-16
Total
Westside Infill Transit Oriented Development(WI-TOD) 15,000,000 15,000,000
Kimball Park Improvements 630,000 2,500,300 3,130,000
Las Palmas Park Improvements 1,400,000 4,785,030 6,185,000
Aquatic Center 3,500,000 3,500,000
8th Street Smart Growth Revitalization 1,300,000 1,000,000 2,300,000
8th Street Safety Enhancements 430,000 430,000
Highland Avenue Safety Improvements 400,000 450,000 850,000
Coolidge Avenue Community Corridor 970,000 283,663 1,253,663
D Avenue Community Corridor- Roundabout 600,000 800,000
4th Street Community Corridor 400,000 400,000
Pon Park 300,000 300,000
Totals 24,930,000 9,018,663 0 0 0 33,948,663
44
WI-TOD
Overall Project Budget Estimate
LOCAL
•$15 Million 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Housing)
•$10 Million Low -Mod Fund Balance
•$2 Million HOME Grant
•$500k State Catalyst Grant
•$500k Federal EPA
•$8.6 Million
•$31 Million
PARTNER
State Prop 1 C Grant ($4.6/$4)
Tax Credits/Bank Loan ($17/$14)
45
Phase I: 109 units (includes
new neighborhood park)
Phase II: 92 units
Kimball Park Improvements
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$3.1 million 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
•$2.5 million
•$600k
Phase I (includes $500,000 "Challenge
Grant" - ARTS)
Phase II
47
Gen, Ctw LW.
• rr...,eWr.a r.m
• Suva No
• Nu�x GeLy VeYrm. N Canted
Mpfd.e'AY� rN.mn
• 1.1.1 New
[asrymun>K
• e,wu oWoe.", a.
• ve a. Caveu+..n
• rw, Wmnen Sqn ffo4
• Cowie
• Cm G4
• [avev hem. ixlel Ad *
• •�aaM1W- _1 ruaywb
• 5uolirad D __ G.m4 trey
• OdaWMI Wert
• Peke 0.mHee10e.ma
• 17'"" u
mjux'x
KIMBALL PARK CONCEPT PLAN- PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS NATIONAL CITY. CALIFORNIA
KIMBALL PARK CONCEPT PLAN- Ph1ASE II IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN LEGEND
[wlH Goak 1.2ta
• hWHN aN ran
• Mu®u �YYa^a 3�W
• IYve.4M Ms
• Mu•Wae,.4aWm 1M1
• f Ic acx}w/MA',le
• Sal... Mmgcd fi.n.imp
• IMry Miay.�6r�[d
•
♦ Iwi Ms. o.Aeup
M91a�
• Goal Una w[., Bu. ,
• ^-
the,.
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
e-tiaggirm Las Palmas Park Improvements
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$6.2 million 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
•$1.2 million
•$5 million
Phase I
Phase II "Challenge Grant" - YMCA
50
PLAN LEGEND
• Cmoy Gqn
•
eq.,4ea r..w.q rwnq lm
• NMawW$k,M Part,
• Pane BA neNs
• oenc e,ware Reu,ewlaw
Rye>w'M"Om Ne. a+lv�sov.P xr�.
• eweey o,wn s[+u+
• G+ucb A^'Ulyr,aa
• Gay red retlMy UP*
• 1.11ng PrMt'w Bi6ee
• e.wnq cal cwx M.mttw�:e
• eve,A,G, frame
• DA, sawn
• eox, rte mul NegAAAA d
• eaw4M ricme Tattoo
• e,ny $grgelew+peme wuisl
• [rwq recvgrrr sryem Uvg, ..,
inroylnx<Yan
LAS PALMAS PARK
CONCEPT PLAN - PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS
DAM MAY 201", Nijaiiir
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA ,ee'
PLAN LEGEND
• E., Kew...
• GULgSM
• Gmn9 belI Came
• Coot,Lcll Cwx Mxmerwte
Goo, OW lies
• Gmly PitnelWn
• CUSung heevim 0nge
• ex.vy re.. W
• Cworvy W4wJpr. Sp,ce
• 105.0on Cnx
• BW Pen Mr
• s,aa ..cc, raw tau
• AICA met,
• YMCA PiW.o,.m naee�
• $rsenron2s0G sn
• AKA MI, ',ewe
• c.,� r,ro. Vn.wM, A«
• r re ruttyw,a
• Uadg,dM Gutty Pnhy L.
• a.gwl
• V?v.1O I1uWe Cfl I GMe
• 14rc.Acnn+q
• NtoomA LWrM
.L000t ir._ G,ce
• eon PvnPw BWMa
P1NyRs1
Rmrrr sera
LA5 PALMAS PARK
CONCEPT PLAN - PHASE II IMPROVEMENTS
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA - r'•
Aquatic Center
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$3.5 million 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
•$830k Port Grant
•$150k County Grant
•$4.5 million Total
53
8th Street Corridor
Smart Growth Revitalization
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$2.3 million
•$2 million
•$2 million
Undergrounding
•$2 million
•$450k
•$200k
•$200k
2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
Sewer Fund
CPUC Rule 20A - Utility
SGIP Grant
SR2S Grant
Gas Tax
Prop A TransNet
•$9.2 million Total
55
err
8th Street Corridor
Safety Enhancements
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$430k 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
•$900k HSIP Grant
•$50k Gas Tax
•$200k Prop A TransNet
•$1.6 million Total
57
Highland Avenue
Safety Enhancements
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$850k 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
•$900k HSIP Grant
•$170k Gas Tax
•$500k Prop A TransNet
•$2.4 million Total
59
jrCoolidge Avenue Community Corridor
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$1.2 million 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
• $730k SR2S Grant
• $50k Gas Tax
• $70k Prop A TransNet
• $2 million Total
61
011111111111111r.
COOLIDGE AVENUE
SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL
KIMBALL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL CONCEPT PLAN
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
D Avenue Community Corridor
A-' / Roundabout
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$600k 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
•$500k SR2S Grant
•$1.1 million Total
63
NoAlum 4th Street Community Corridor
Overall Project Budget Estimate
•$400k 2011 Tax Allocation Bond (Capital)
•$355k BTA Grant
•$245k CDBG Grant
•$200k Prop A TransNet
•$1.2 million Total
65
Bike lanes and traffic calming are proposed on 4' Street from Roosevelt Avenue to Harbison Avenue. 4 Street is
a wide two lane east -west cogactor street with on -street parallel parking The speed limit on 4e Street i 35 mph
and the average daily traffic Is between 5,000 and 10,000. The existing curb -to -curb width west of Palm Avenue is
48' feet and varies between 52' and 64' east of Palm avenue. The wide roadway widths ran accommodate bike
lanes throughout the corridor without impacting existing parallel parking. Bike lanes and traffic cabling
measures are proposed along the corridor to improve bicycle connectivity to destbations including 0 rayon Park,
Paradise Valley Hospital, the new Senior Homing development, and San Diego academy.
• 2 miles of Class II Bike lanes
• Bicycle loop detectors at all signalized
Intersections
• Curb Extension with high yblbgtty crosswalks
Curb extensions reduce the dbtance of pedestrian crossings by
extending the sidewalk out to align with the edge of the parking lane.
Placed at Intersections or at mid -block crosswalk locations, curb
extensions and high -visibility crosswalks both talm traffic and also
increase the vMbkry of pedestrians waiting to crass the street. Curb
extensions should only extend across the garbing lane and not
obstruct bicyclists' path of travel or the travel lane.
• Bike lane Adjacent to On -Street Parallel
Parking 13.11
• Bicycle Signal Actuation 1.3.2.1
• Road Diet Perking Reduction 1.3.3.3
• On -Street Bikeway Slpnge 3.1.2
66
FY 2012-13 Recommended
`'=--r
CIP
Project Appropriations
Fund 001 — General Fund (reimbursable)
Kimball Tower Rehab (1593)
$465,000
Morgan Tower Rehab (1594)
$225,000
Fund 108 — Library Capital Outlay
New Library Rehab (1590)
$150,000
Fund 109 — Gas Tax
Traffic Monitoring (6573)
$200,000
Fund 189 — Civic Center Refurbishing
Chiller Project (Air Side) (1591)
$100,000
Fund 301 — CDBG
Concrete Improvements(6137)
$220,657
67
FY 2012-13 Recommended
CIP
(continued)
---=�� Project Appropriations
Fund 307 — Proposition A
Street Resurfacing (6035)
$520,000
Traffic Signal Upgrades (6558)
$50,000
Plaza Boulevard Improvements (6569)
$200,000
Fund 522 — Low Mod
WI-TOD Phase I (1592)
$8,000,000
Fund 524 — 2011 TAB (Capital Improvements)
8th Street Revitalization (3918)
$1,000,000
Kimball Park Improvements (4132)
$2,500,000
Las Palmas Park Improvements (4133)
$4,785,000
Highland Avenue Improvements (6170)
$450,000
Coolidge Avenue Improvements (6173)
$283,663
Total CIP (FY 2012-13)
$19,349,320
68
NAT isa :ICITp
Successor Agency to the Community
Development Commission as the National
City Redevelopment Agency
Brad Raulston & Claudia Silva
69
Background
• ABx 1 26 was upheld by the Supreme Court in
December, 2011
• Redevelopment agencies were dissolved
effective February 1, 2012, activating the
Successor Agency
• The Oversight Board held its first meeting on
April 10 and On May 2, the Oversight Board
approved the Recognized Payment Obligations
Schedules (ROPS) I and II for the periods
January 1, 2012 thru June 30, 2012; and July 1,
2012 thru December 31, 2012
• Legislative Updates on ABx 1 26
70
•
Redevelopment Impacts
Previously funded by Tax Increment
Included in Preliminary General Fund Budget
— Personnel costs ($1.2M)
— Enterprise Zone ($51 k)
— Graffiti Program
Currently not Included in Preliminary General Fund Budget (will seek
Council direction)
— South County Economic Development Council ($5k)
— Economic Development Programs with Chamber ($50k)
— Amortization Implementation ($25-$50k)
— Property Management for CDC Assets ($100k+)
Unfunded Administrative Costs
Unspent Bond Proceeds
71
---', Forecast
• Uncertainty with Federal Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) Funding
— During past two years, $1 B in federal cuts to CDBG
program with additional cuts to HOME
— The President's proposed budget includes a slight
increase to CDBG and a maintenance of HOME funds
• Uncertainty with State Budget
— Proposed Post -RDA Budget Concerns
• Retirement cost increases
— PERS lowered the discount rate from 7.75% to 7.5%.
Miscellaneous rates will increase by 1 % to 2%, safety
rates will increase by 3% to 4% (two year phase in)
73
Forecast
• Water Rates
— Metropolitan Water District is anticipated to
raise rates by 5% in both 2013 and 2014
• Fire Dispatch
— If San Miguel leaves to Cal Fire, the City could
see a rate increase of $55,000 in Heartland
Dispatch fees
• Cost Allocation Study
— Impact on fees
— Full cost recovery
74
Budget Calendar - Next Steps
• May 22: Preliminary budget report
• May 23: Begin finalizing budget
documents
• June 19: Adoption of the FY 2012-2013
budgets for the City and the Successor
Agency
• June 19: Management Compensation Plan
• Quarterly updates
• January/February 2013: Mid -Year Budget
Review and Strategic Planning
76
Going Forward — FY 2012-13
Budget Process
• Staff will closely monitor budget and update
Council on budgetary goals on a quarterly basis
• Staff may recommend revisions to budget at
January 2013 mid -year budget review
• If budget assumptions are NOT met, there are 3
options:
— Use additional contingency reserves, or
— Service reductions; or
— Combination of both
77
Strategic Planning — Next Steps
• 5-year Strategic Plan
— Community Services
• Sustaining Quality of Life Facilities
• YMCA Challenge Grant
• ARTS Challenge Grant
— Information Technology
— Public Works
• Fleet Replacement and Maintenance
• Parks and Facilities
• Streets, Sewer, and Stormwater
78
City Manager's Closing Comments
• Significant strides made by all City departments
to cut costs, become more efficient and enhance
revenues
• The deficit is being addressed through a
combination of employee concessions, managed
attrition, slightly improved revenues and one-time
fixes. New revenue streams are needed
• The impacts of dissolution of the redevelopment
agency will continue to unfold over the course of
the fiscal year
80
City Manager's Closing Comments
• City will remain committed to building
partnerships with the community, local
businesses and regional partners
• City will continue to streamline the way we do
business and better align the functions of city
departments
• Strategic Organizational Efficiencies
— 5 Departments (Police, Fire, Engineering, Community
Services, Administrative Services)
• Employee Participation
— Gatekeeper Mechanisms/CARE Committee
— Pension
— Furlough
81
-w, N..
ftt
�°- City Manager's Closing Comments
• No forced employee reductions anticipated
• Core City programs will remain intact
however service levels may be impacted
• Budget Committee: Brad Raulston,
Stacey Stevenson, Tina Norrdin, Janel
Pehau, Suzanne Wellcome, Teresa
Mendoza, Steve Manganiello, Barby
Tipton
82
City Manager Recommendations
• Continue efforts to balance the budget
• Use General Fund unassigned fund balance to close the
projected General Fund gap, if needed (currently
projected at $558,028)
• Programs recommended for GF funding
— Employee Wellness Programs
— 125th Anniversary
• Former TI expenditures currently not included in
Preliminary General Fund Budget
— Economic Development
• South County Economic Development Council 57D/0 tie
• Chamber of Commerce SvD,D (Q.a
— Property Management for CDC Assets mm0,a0
— Amortization Implementation
83
City Council
Comments & Direction
wileVinT
City Manager Recommendations
& City Council Direction
• Continue efforts to balance the budget
• Use General Fund unassigned fund balance to close the
projected General Fund gap, if needed (currently
projected at $558,028)
• Programs recommended for GF funding
— Employee Wellness Programs
— 125'h Anniversary
• Former TI expenditures currently not included in
Preliminary General Fund Budget
— Economic Development
• South County Economic Development Council
• Chamber of Commerce
— Property Management for CDC Assets
— Amortization Implementation
86