Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 11-07 CC HA ADJ MIN (2)Book 99 / Page 194 11-07-2017 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN WORKSHOP November 7, 2017 The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City was called to order at 4:38 p.m. by Mayor / Chairman Ron Morrison. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Morrison, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Administrative Officials present: Della, Deese, Duong, Morris -Jones, Parra, Raulston, Roberts, Rodriguez, Stevenson, Vergara, Williams. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS SPECIFIC PLAN — DOWNTOWN (417-01-09) MUNICIPAL CODE 2017 (506-02-32) 1. Ordinance No. 2017-2441. Public Hearing and Adoption of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending the Downtown Specific Plan (Applicant: City -Initiated Land Use Amendment) (Case File 2017-24A) (Planning) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Ordinance amending the Downtown Specific Plan based on the updated draft with Planning Commission and that the staff return in six months with proposed housing policies and or Ordinances that address affordability and provide consistency with State laws. PRESENTATION: Staff presentations were made on the proposed Updated Draft Land Use Plan. TESTIMONY: Irvin Martinez, National City, representing Alliance Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) said there was a need for more community input and concern about housing affordability. Paola Martinez, representing ACCE, said market rate housing would not meet the needs of residents and there are many tenant based housing issues in the city that need attention and requested more time to get the community involved in the issues. Adriana Huerta, National City, said she did not receive any notice at her home regarding the meeting and that the community needs more time to address the housing needs of current residents. Semilla Luna Marquez, National City, expressed concern about gentrification that is already taking place in the city and the need for a more compassionate and human centered approach to development. Book 99 / Page 195 11-07-2017 PUBLIC HEARINGS: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (cont.) SPECIFIC PLAN — DOWNTOWN (417-01-09) MUNICIPAL CODE 2017 (506-02-32) 1. TESTIMONY (cont.): Martha Ramon, National City, St. Anthony's Church, spoke about the housing problems confronting large and small families and senior citizens and the need to proceed slowly so the people can be more involved in expressing their needs for housing. Nancy Estolano, questioned the proposed height limitations, limiting the number of units is each zone and a change in the number of FAR's permitted. Jose Lopez, representing ACCE, requested a delay in voting to get more community input regarding rent control, displacement and inclusionary housing. Fabio Rojas, National City, spoke about gentrification, inclusionary housing, rent control, affordable housing and density bonuses. Janice Martinelli, National City, speaking for Historical Society, expressed concern about the impacts of installing parking meters. Dr. Kyra Green, Executive Director of Center on Policy Initiatives, spoke about of importance of keeping housing costs down so that existing residents will not be displaced. Jose Rodriguez, National City, spoke about the high cost of rent, the long waiting list for Section 8, the impacts on seniors and the need for delay to get more community input. ACTION: Motion by Sotello, seconded by Rios, to continue the hearing to February 13th. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil, Morrison. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Motion by Cano, seconded by Morrison, to close the Public Hearing. Motion carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Morrison, Rios. Nays: Sotelo-Solis. Abstain: None. Absent: None. Motion by Cano, seconded by Mendivil, to adopt the Ordinance. Motion carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Morrison. Nays: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Abstain: None. Absent: None. NOTE: All presentation materials are attached as Exhibit "A". Members retired into Closed Session at 5:32 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION Book 99 / Page 196 11-07-2017 2. Conference with Legal Counsel — Potential Litigation Significant Exposure to Litigation under Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) Three Potential Cases 3. Conference with Legal Counsel — Potential Litigation Significant Exposure to Litigation under Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) Notice of Intent to Sue for Violations of Clean Water Act & Notice of Imminent and Substantial Endangerment and Intent to Sue for Violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery by International Boundary and Water Commission and Veolia Water North America- West, LLC ACTION: The Closed Session was continued until after the Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City scheduled for 6:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Motion by Cano, seconded by Mendivil, to hold the Closed Session after the Regular Meeting and to adjourn the meeting to the next Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City to be held - Tuesday — November 7, 2017 at 6:00 p.m. at the Council Chambers, National City, California. Carried by unanimous vote. The meeting closed at 6:07 p.m. ti ,, 4 City CI rk The foregoing minutes were approved at the Regular Meeting of April 17, 2018. Mayor Downtown National City Specific Plan CITY COUNCIL MEETING November 7, 2017 Agenda 1) PLAN OVERVIEW 2) LAND USE 3) PARKING 4) CIRCULATION 5) DESIGN GUIDELINES 6) CEQ,AJREVtEW PROCESS 7) STAFF RECOMMENDATION TOGETHER WE CAN! Action Requested - Staff Recommendation: Adopt the Ordinance amending the Downtown Specific Plan based on updated draft with Planning Commission recommendations. Plan - Overview Funded through a SANDAG Smart Growth Incentive Program Grant to provide guidance for the 158-acre downtown to: o Integrate smart growth policies and transit supportive planning o Provide innovative smart parking policies & reduction bonuses o Revitalize downtown by encouraging investment o Enhance the public realm through design guidelines o Improve mobility options and efficiencies Oevr2loper litre ch` 'Marker. Condition Research Amin' ethnical Analysis 2016 SEPT OCT Development of Draft Concepts Revise Plan, Final Technica NOV DEC City Council J Planning Commission Workshop 2017 JAN MAR RFP Released for the Redevelopment Properties APR Specific Plan Open House and Scheduled Interviews Smart Growth Incentive Grant Cycle 3 (2015) Scope Potential strategies and policies of the DSP Amendment that will help achieve Smart Growth and Smart Parking objectives include: Reduce parking requirements if project includes Parking &Traffic Demand Management strategies; Support shared parking agreements for developments that are within an acceptable walking distance of an off-street parking facility; and Consider a parking district and management plan that is intended to manage parking assets and avoid neighborhood parking impacts. 32nd Street Naval Station Smart Growth Opportunity Areas Existing/planned Potential Metropolitan Center Urban Center Town Center Community Center Rural Village Special Use Center Mixed Use Transit Corridor ,••? t *'r se • i t ;f0 � 1 1 Diego aim."'�' ". raft' WARD' L The R,,9ional Flan What we heard from initial comments and input Simplify plan and make "user-friendly." Promote housing that serves the community. Allow for micro -units. Allow bonus units or reduced parking if parking programs & amenities are added. Allow a process for density transfer. Protect intact neighborhoods and allow for transitions between densities. Offer a streamlined process that encourages investment. Downtown Specific Plan Amendment Goals and Objectives Economic Investment Objectives • Encourage investment in downtown, provide value & encourage partnerships between land owners, developers, businesses & residents • Coordinate with the Navy, colleges & other institutions to create a more vibrant downtown by encouraging more persons to live & shop in downtown • Adjust zoning, land uses and development regulations to increase opportunities for the redevelopment parcels as well as other downtown parcels • The Plan will not change: o Land use / zoning o Street classifications o Floor Area Ratio maximums or minimums (FAR) o Density related to 5,500 units (300 built since plan adopted) • The Plan proposes to change: o Defines height restrictions to be more consistent with FAR o Redefine "ground -floor retail" as "street activating uses" o Suggest an adaptive reuse policy for "main street style" buildings o Propose a transfer of development rights in certain circumstances o Establish 5 proposed design districts and supporting guidelines o Improve review process to include ministerial review options o Suggest various intersection and streetscape enhancements o Plan for a shuttle system, expanded bike and pedestrian options o Implements Parking Action Plan for downtown area o Considers methods for attainable housing / affordable by design o Allows Institutional (schools) uses with Conditional Use Permit 7S SS Attainable Housing Numerous bills have passed in 2017 to promote the development of attainable housing in California: SB-2: The Building Homes and Jobs Act creates funding by imposing up to a $225 on certain real estate transactions. Over the next five years it is anticipated to raise a total of $5.8 billion. These funds will support homelessness programs and create mixed -income multifamily housing. SB-3: This bill would authorize $4 billion in bonds to finance existing housing programs. This bill would authorize $3 billion in bonds for the construction of new low-income housing and $1 billion to the Gal -Vet Farm and Home Loan Program. SB-35: Eliminates multiple local planning reviews for projects that meet certain zoning and affordability standards in jurisdictions with lagging housing production rates. The bill also requires qualifying projects to meet prevailing wage standards for construction workers. AB-73: Provides local governments with incentives to rezone developments to increase housing density near transit and job centers. At least 20 percent of the housing projects must be low- or middle -income residents. If zoning standards are met, permits will be granted without delay. AB-1505: Restores the ability of local governments to require developers to include affordable rental units, after an appellate court decision cut off that tool in 2009. AB-1521: Owners must accept a qualified offer to purchase the apartment complex from someone who pledges to continue renting the home to low-income residents. Attainable Housing AB-571: This bill would authorize the California Tax Credit Allocation Committee to allocate the farmworker housing credit even if the taxpayer receives federal credits. Farmworker housing is redefined as housing in which at least 50 percent of the units are occupied by farmworkers. AB-1397: This bill would require the inventory of land to be available for residential development to meet the locality's housing need for a designated income level. SB-166: Pushes cities and counties to plan for their share of low-income and moderate -income housing needed in the region. AB-879: This bill instructs cities to determine how long it takes developers to build their projects after they have been approved and then take steps to shorten that time. SB-167: Cities that do not comply with a court order to allow development will accrue fines of $10,000 per housing unit. AB-678: The Housing Accountability Act prohibits a local agency from disapproving, or conditioning approval a housing development project for very low, low, or moderate -income, or an emergency shelter unless specified written findings based upon substantial evidence in the record are made. AB-1515: This bill would specify that a housing development project or emergency shelter is deemed consistent with an applicable plan, program, policy, etc. similar if there is substantial evidence that would allow to conclude that the housing development project is consistent. AB-72: Gives the State housing department more authority to investigate cities that do not follow their housing plans and refers cases to California's attorney general for possible legal action. STAFF WILL RETURN TO CITY COUNCIL IN NEXT 6 MONTHS WITH PROPOSED HOUSING POLICIES THAT ADDRESS AFFORDABILITY AND CONSISTENCY WITH STATE LAWS .and • Use * The plan will continue to focus on encouraging a variety of land uses: o Mixed uses help to encourage more Local services, jobs and places of business and allows the market to decide best use. o This amendment continues to allow for all previously allowed uses o The form of the buildings and FARs are more important than dictating the preferred land uses or percentages of mixed uses. Downtown Specific Plan Amendment Goals and Objectives Land Use and Urban Design Objectives • Update land use and zoning to better accommodate the previously adopted allowance of 5,200 additional residential units • Adopt a process for density transfer if public amenities or unique buildings are reused • Create consistency with state laws density bonus applied to transit areas and ministerial processing requirements Existing Land Uses Existing/Proposed Development Zones Existing Land Use (SanGiS) 01N $T C1vsc CENTER OR c Existing Lond Use (San615) NM Parking Lot light Industry - General 1♦ Public Services lent St sr i — - z uG C.TVO3ONST 1ST ST School Single Family Detached Single Forney Multiple-UNis PIM Multi -Family Residential Cammerc oiIOfnce . ''".: Residential Under Constr.:anon Hotel/Motel (Low -Rises: Hotel/Motel High. -Rise) Vacant and Undeveloped Lond ® Recreation DTSP Boundary 5 v ON ST ION S1 dP45T 0 71H S1 !RN 5T PLAZA DEW 14110ST t 1111133 5 ME e0C S (ijFent Legend Devetopmorn Zone Q Downtown Speck Plan Ares is 47$ sr r TA yJ 711 3 3 o•r s c-> :ST ST 1iw5- 444 7, 5. 4T- 5" 5T' 5' RTr 5' 4 o __ 4 7 ST CMC CENTER OR 141H ST I57H ST InTH s 17TH 5T W 111714 ST se !1 7TH ST 1 10 L ST 11 16 T7TH ST MH ST Minimum Floor Area Ratios Maximum Floor Area Ratios 9Ti- ST CIVIC CENTER DR 1a',H ST 173 DTSP Boundary Parmlt, Minimum FAR 0 2.5:1 2:1 OM 3:1 i — U ..TH ST 1 - S '3 12TH 9T 1OTH ST — rd .r DIVISION ST 1ST ST SRO ST 4TH ST STH STH ST 7TH ST 1..1 1TH ST inr aT _ Range from 0-3 FAR PLAZA BLVD w ,4TH ST 15TH ST 760 4H i_. CTCR Bounda'v Parcels Maximum FAR 3.1 4:1 5'1 tRIRfi1 Range from 3-6 FAR FeMI Existing Floor Area Ratios Devebemenl Zonea Panel: Exly5ng FAR <C 25 — — 0.25-0 50 0 57-1 00 00-, 50 1.50-2 00 2.00.3.00 '600.500 NM ,500 Range from .25 to 5 FAR 35C Transitional Residential Areas & Adaptive Reuse of Older Buildings Property Types /1\ rr,o, 9114 ST a CNIC CENTER DR 1TFI ST ilkommamRoRimiONNTRimi 1 ■ I I1H ST ! I 1 ■ 1 • 17TH ST 16TH ST 1 . r.,...I...,.% ;K ii3 ,SIS, ! NO ST II 'n Sr <• :limy A i■ - 111 4114 ST f i ■ 5TH ST it 5TH ST I 1 i i A R , 1 MIST F F...•.. I NE .. . I 8TH ST I n ..! 1 ST ..6- < ■ 1 ielieflielMOBINOMMOINI 1 Sr IIH ST I.INI.I..l.I. WI 161" 6TH ST T1M ST HTH S1 PLAZA RIND 0 14TH ST 151HST MI Property Types Single Family Neighborhood - Various Levels of Intactness Storefront Main Street Buildings ; , OTSP Boundary • Single family homes need adjacent transitions of land use, form, height and intensity; • Historic structures and "Main Street Type" character buildings, should be allowed a transfer of development rights; and • "Main Street Type" character buildings should be allowed a development bonus for adaptive reuse that preserves "Main Street" character while meeting minimum FAR & urban design guidelines. Proposed Height Restrictions (la, lb, 4, 6 & 7 defined as 250'/ 8, & 10 increased from 35'-50') 7—Division Street Typical building forms i J extruded to maximum height % per development zone f t L l Hoover Avenue Buildings in white --+ will likely not change due to age and prior investment I8th Street it MI; 191 Plaza Boulevard 16th Street National City Boulevard tra Development Scenarios- Building Typology 5 Floors (Type 3 Construction) on 3 floors of Podium Parking with Retail Wrap - 85' tall for 8 floors ntrt ittttw trrrrt� • 99r;illtlf°tnNorurl/rurrr 31/111fI[ 10111 * uIntr/1 • �� >i. r:. r•... r rU1It�iH11111M r!1 rma _- -. �7fil tr1�N11H ❑I m 1.1.1ntie r Lill 10 Floors (Type 1 Construction) on 4 Floors Podium Retail Front / Parking- 165' tall for 14 floors . F— — VL •sr oral 'n 15 Floors (Type 1 Construction) on 3 levels of Podium Parking (+1 underground) with Ground Floor Retail Wrap - 185'- 250' tall for 17 — 23 floors r - .— r — - .- r • — — — mamma OMEN ION M - - AMMO +. MIMEO .1•1. Am ' Ill 111111110, _ 14 Stories (165') counting 4 stories of parking podium Development Scenarios- Building Typology Heights (8, 14 & 17 floors) 8 stories (85') counting 3 stories of parking podium ' t ti , Y�_1. `� Allowed in la, 1b, 4,5b,6,7&9 17 Stories (185') with wrapped or underground parking Allowed in la, lb, 4,6&7 elan - r �V. ,114.4 �.r' - __ orillow Parking • Supports and encourages mixed -use, compact development. • Plans for Future Growth and Parking Demand. • Creates flexible recommendations that encourages innovation, recognizes trends, builds partnerships, assures feasibility and provides increased management to limit parking impacts. • Recommends short, mid, and long term solutions. Parking Action Plan • Approved by City Council on June 20, 2017 to initiate the first phase of parking management implementation for Downtown National City • Designed as a two-year parking pilot program that considers unique local conditions and national best practices • Parking Management Strategies to enhance parking enforcement, capacity and utilization: o New enforcement technologies o Online permit parking system o Conversion of parallel parking to angled parking o Single space parking meters SOH AVE COOLIDGE AVE 9 n 3 0 HOOVER AVE ROOS_vaT AVE 1 N 13 i 3 I a 1 WITOHAL COY BLVD i I i I .— I i i I i j 1 I i 1 1 i o 1 i i 1 1 i 1 I 1 i •---•---•---•---•---.---.! MVE E AVE N z i O ZO I i I i I SAVE I I CAVE }! 1 4 ( GAVE IIIGHL ND AVE F AVE LANNA N fly.' 0 D AVE GLAi)Ii .A r 0 C) 0 3 0 0 0 mC • V VI 0 1 •ui pe, pa •uv•ui)Iae, ION AVE TAFT AV i ,,` 1 L. i i _ ROOW/STAVE 4- I NATIONAL CITY ELVO • { 1 1 i 1 1 _ i _-••'-- i 1 4 1 8AVE 1 I 1 1 • i 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I CAVl I1 1 1r -'--_ I 1 • 1 1 1 I L-..-_.. I HOOVER AVE SAVE FAVE PRIVATE RO a E AVE GAVE y1GFILAf fL AVE S A F AVE CANNA OR GL, C OLA DR 1 suomgiyoid 6upped apiyan pezisaanp .110I suoge3o 0) c L D. "E w w ots i W r0) . v 0. I car) O N O • ez 0 J ac' ✓1040V1`J as VNNV.^. 3AV1 9AY 0 2 j -'--- 3AYY �•_�— CI cc 3AV 9 a V 3 n rn� L ICNICI I z n nn tlAlg tu'_5•�tfo� � n�— � I i t 3AV 113A3S0011 i 3AV 93A001? N.' 3AV 3°J0I100� z~ U 3AV NOS 11V 14V1 ocations for Ex • ansion of Residential Permit • ar in • Parking Management Implementation Phase 1 (1-3) Years Phase 2 (3-5 Years) r- Review enforcement program and ensure consistent enforcement Transition to digital permitting dig Invest in enforcement technology Implement online permit management system Begin converting parallel parking to angled parking Review restrictions & fines Complete angled parking conversion Implement active monitoring Enhance enforcement Implement parking/transit shuttle system Establish parking bonus system for Create parking manager position off-street parking/shared parking 4 Reform off-street requirements3 Establish paid parking 111 Expand residential permit zone iril Implement oversized vehicle parking restrictions ammti rate and refine the parking bonus system Integrate parking updates into budget Establish a downtown parking benefit district Invest revenue Phase 3 (5-20 Years) Add parking availability signage Establish In -lieu fees Continue active monitoring Plan infrastructure for autonomous vehicles Implement shares parking Parking Trends Considered • Land use policies should consider 10-minute walking / biking neighborhoods and overall driving distances in order to reduce vehicle miles traveled. • Focus on "park once / visit many destinations" planning philosophies. • Autonomous vehicle's will affect on roadway capacity & parking resources. Drop of zones for rideshare / shuttles / autonomous car drop- offs are needed. Smart Parking Example Arrival Mode Estimate of Persons / Customers Delivered Regular Vehicle Parking 21 41111kkiiicWitt21 _ " . ' 0(1 : ”11,21 Arrival Mode Estimate of Persons / Customers Delivered Bike Parking Motorcycle o Parking . S.�1 / NEV Parkingmall Vehicle Uber Dropoff 4111> Taxi Dropoff t�pa Guest Dropoff :_, Shuttle Dropoff 63 persons/day 113 persons/day circulation • Circulation Changes are focused on: o Community Corridors o Alternative Transportation Modes including Walking, Biking, Transit and Shuttle o Proposed Improvements are Focused on Roosevelt Avenue and 8th Street Street Functions and Focus NATIONAL CITY DOWNTOWN 0 SPECIFIC PLAN STREET FUNCTION & FOCUS: ARTERIAL Vehicular Through Movements Transit Support ✓ 0 Improved Commercial Improved Bike Walking Major Traffic Major Street Storm Water Support / Access Environments Calming Trees Innovations Parking Sample Streets Plaza Blvd. East of NCB COLLECTOR I ✓ "D" Avenue LOCAL STREET ✓ 9th Street COMMUNITY CORRIDORS GREEN STREETS MULTI -MODAL STREETS COMMERCIAL MAIN STREETS MAIN STREET PARK & WALK STREETS ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ "A" Avenue Hoover t 8th / National City Blvd. ti/ Roosevelt Street Classification - No Changes Existing Roadway Classification V1H 5T Community Corridors- Additions and Sub -Categories Bth Strnet *Trolley Slatkm NBSD ,� South Gate L•J •Jt•r 1 a _4. r 11TH ST 12TN ST CIVr CENTER DR 16TH ST 1 1 DMSIONSt 1ST ST ( ` 12ND ST • 4 1 O 4 134DST 1 .TH ST 1 STH ST t 1 LSTH ST , 4 e " t o MA Sr • • • SW Colleve PoJce DaOt GTy FiaX •••••R•.2.0Zi 411111 .511. ST .• • I OTH ST • I 1 PtAtA BLVD 17 K11nbaH Park 1 - i Main Street (8th Street) O Commercial Street (National City Blvd.) O Multi -Modal Street (Roosevelt) 0 Green Street / Urban Trail ("A" Avenue) Mobility Options- Bike 1 Ped / Shuttle Improvements Option A — Multi -use Trail with Parallel Parking 4r • ■ • • H' Curt, vCW ma JD' AIhM/y NOW • • • It •r* r se •r • ire i•Pwt4•ItK Rb 9bect lntcnea•n Lcn1+'.1 N,.rtl, � MOOre r.%1r i:r.tlnrersfWn li/-&. fn ft+Ofstgrnen[ wen x„Ved pro f -. Option B — Walkway with Angled Parking tr • r • Y CNMt•w lAwr•• it •16Mae RPM IV Circulation Improvement •mmExleting Multi -Modal Corridor • • Proposed Multi-McdetCorridor .iiiExlsting Urban Trall/Street • • • Proposed Urban Trall/Street AIM Existing Main Street '"'""Existing Commercial Street Development Zone * Point of Interest NBSD South Ga co 8th Street Transit Center 27H ST CIVIC CENTER DR WrL SON AVE 127H>!?I, 14TH ST eJ 16TH ST 2N0 ST 14 3RD ST • 5TH ST H ST liege 11THsr; 6 W 2 3 is 2N0 ST DMS10N ST 19T ST 0 3RD ST 4THST !;TN ST STH ST 7TH ST 8 K u 9 59 Police` city Dept Ho 16 at 10 9TH ST a 11 12A Library w PLAZA BLVD • 0 LL ioNaZ Main / Division / National City Blvd. New Signal & Intersection Reconfiguration (with City of San Diego Partnership) North & Central Roosevelt Avenue Bike, Pedestrian, Parking & Shuttle Improvements Roosevelt Avenue & 8th Street Intersection Bulb -outs & Enhanced Crosswalks Hoover & 8th Street Intersection Signalization, Bulb -outs & Enhanced Crosswalk 1-5 Southbound Off -ramp "T" Intersection, Signals, Bulb -outs & Crosswalk (with Caltrans Partnership) Harbor Drive and 8th Street "T" Intersection, Signals, Bulb -outs & Crosswalk (with Port / Navy Partnership) South Roosevelt Avenue Bike, Pedestrian, Parking & Shuttle Improvements (Southwestern Community College Partnership) 5 Design Guidelines • Design Guidance is provided for: o Building Design (private building improvements) o Public Realm on Private Property o Public Realm in Public Right of Way Urban Design Districts and Guidelines DOWNTOWN DISTRICT Main Street District Downtown Visitor & Education District General Commercial District Neighborhood Transition District Institutional District CMC CENTER OR T4 a t; • Ja 41,11 �•'a_ jar 111 ilE � Liu it T lidi.) ,1 POI r . • ij 'I' • (q „ to( _ rtip l� 4r1;04.) er S fehlie# L_ • "• � /J 8th Street O e 0 Main Street Arch tcctural Style © Wide Sidewal<s © Angled Parking O St met Lighting © St-eet Trees n T-ee Grates 0 Urba' Fumish ngs and Seating Arca National City Boulevard • Mix of Uses © Wide Sidewa ks OLandscaped Pole= ian O S_reet _fighting Q Urban I urr ishmgs aid Sett ng Area 0 Sweet Trees in Tree Grates Q One to Three -Story Commercial Buildings © Auto -Accommodating Development Q Off -Street parking a On -Street Parking © Landscaped Median Q Street Lighting O Street Trees "Neighborhood Transition" District Guidance 41 Mix of Uses with Emphasis cr Residential f Parkway © On-5treet Parking 0 Medium to _ow Density Transitions © Street Trees C Street Lighting !ma Btvr; Design Guideline District Steetsc<ipe Design Segments Symbol Street Main , Commercial Streets NW 8th stirNetlon& Chy Blvd f l D Ave $`National City Division St. - 2nd !Svc St National Coy 2nd St 12th St ✓ ✓ / NnbonBhc! el 12th St -16tln St �� ' , / MilaiMlig ie lath St. A Ave - D Ave ..® / 'IA Ave C vBtvd,i.,.0 t'/ ' - inE11.11111111 re �k--. _ nrttsT �. DRAve veeveA A - j QAv 81hSt. National aAit - IIL atitmal City Bhr1 � — Plaza Bkl ntas1MP 5- D Ave UPI" 12th St Rcosevett Ave Ave _ 16- cMc Center R osevelt Ave 10 Y ✓ Dr National City Blvd I2ooseves Nauonnl cry Blvd ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ J Ave -16th St Br— DAve 7IhSt- Paz+Btvd �/ No/ r ; DST Q ORD 5T I 4TH sT STH ST ` 6TH ST a I9TH ST I PLAZA BLVD rirlirere".. 0 Wayfinding / Signage Guidance 1 4TH 5T I STH 5T `6TH 3T Q 4 m 12114 5S 4 ov c CENTER DR •ST. 5: 16TH 5Ty R ! I K NA 19THST PLAZA BLVD IP Legend • Arrival Monument Skin (3 Proposed) • neig1bor11ood Gateway Sign (7 Proposed) • Street/traffic I I1311t 1 %reclional Sign tS Proposed! F'", Itrerpletive S yn (3 ProPtlsedi 9 Instnlle l 51rgn Isymr>nl rminr vanes] Wavfirdinc Berl lei Corridor `_ Downtown Specific Plan Arca 1 t 1 TTH $T / o ip a i ,aro ST c _ 1 1 v` c 13ao sr 0 r o / � 1 1 1 5TH ST BTH ST / 1Enl ST' .1 / 1 I 1 / 19T11 ST I o i do KAZA BLVD VJ , { r Legend f'" Art Nod0 . Art InterSectton um Art Coridor `_4 Downtown Spec.fic Plan Area CEQA/ Review Process • Suggested Process Changes: o Allow for Transfer of Development Rights o Allow for Unit Bonus or Parking Reduction based on Developer Selected / Funded PTDM Choices o Identify 3 Levels of Project Review including Level 1 Ministerial Review o Suggest Staff / Department / Professional Review for Design Guideline Conformance CEQA Review Process for the Amendment - Project builds on existing 2005 Specific Plan & 2012 General Plan - State legislation and CEQA guidance allows for using previous CEQA review - Changes found in amendment analyzed by an initial CEQA checklist - Only traffic had the potential of new impacts - Supplemental traffic memo prepared indicated no new impacts with the implementation of proposed project elements, improvements and policies Traffic / Parking Control Mechanisms - Adoption and implementation of the Parking Action Plan - Integration of the density bonus / parking reduction PTDM element - Requirement for traffic analysis if 5,500 units exceeded OR development zone units exceeded OR development transfer or any variance that would change standard parking requirement or trip generation of the project Project Levels and Review Process t u Q. E AMENDMENT BASED a) DISCRETIONARY PROJECT VARIANCE BASED LFVI_L 1 • DISCRETIONARY a PROJECT 1- aJ CONFORMING MINISTERIAL PROJECTS bu c PRCJECT REVIEW LEVELS Pcio4cs, (ondtional ,Pom c nerve n-s • 0 Overall Processing Goals: 1) Identify a ministerial review process. - Most developer's want to develop a ministerial process since discretionary adds substantial time, costs and lack of confidence in a final outcome. State affordable housing & companion unit legislation requires a ministerial process. 2) Offer efficient processing & CEQA review. - Makes housing attainable & affordable by design. - Attracts investment & delivery of needed housing - State legislation allows for streamlined CEQA for infill projects in transit supported areas. 3) Protect neighborhood from impacts. - Need parking management and enforcement. - Require traffic analysis when exceeding standards. Establish transition zones near single family areas. - Institute design guidelines and review process. 7 Action Item Staff Recommendation: Adopt the Ordinance amending the Downtown Specific Plan based on updated draft with Planning Commission recommendations. z .4=10