HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC ORD 1996-2122 Adds Ch. 1.44 [1.48], administrative remedies (1.48)ORDINANCE NO. 9 6 -212 2
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
ADDING CHAPTER 1.44 TO THE NATIONAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of National City that
Chapter 1.44 is hereby added to the National City Municipal Code, to read as follows:
Chapter 1.44
ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES
Sections:
1.44.010 Applicability
1.44.020 Director -- Defined
1.44.030 Compliance Order
1.44.040 Method of Service
1.44.050 Hearing -- Review Board -- Planning Commission or Advisory and
Appeals Board
1.44.060 Hearing
1.44.070 Hearing -- Notice -- Scheduling -- Purpose
1.44.080 Hearing -- Procedures
1.44.090 Administrative Order
1.44.100 Administrative Penalties
1.44.110 Administrative Costs
1.44.120 Failure to Comply with Administrative Order
1.44.130 Right of Judicial Review
1.44.140 Recovery of Administrative Civil Penalties
1.44.150 Report of Compliance after Administrative Order
1.44.160 Compliance Dispute
1.44.170 Lien Procedure
1.44.180 Public Hearing and Protests
1.44.190 Recording of Lien
1.44.200 Satisfaction of Lien
1.44.010 Applicability
A. This Chapter provides for administrative remedies, which are in
addition to all other legal remedies, criminal or civil, which may be pursued by the City
to address any violation of this Code.
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 2 of 10
B. Use of this Chapter shall be at the sole discretion of the City.
1.44.020 Director -- Defined. For purposes of this Chapter, "Director"
means the head of any City department or his/her designee, who is charged with
responsibility for enforcement of any provision of this Code.
1.44.030 Compliance Order.
A. Whenever the Director determines that a violation of any provision
of this Code within the Director's responsibility is occurring or exists, the Director may
issue a written Compliance Order to any person responsible for the violation.
B. A Compliance Order issued pursuant to this Chapter shall contain the
following information:
violation;
1. The date and location of the violation;
2. The section of this Code violated and a description of the
3. The actions required to correct the violation;
4. The time period after which administrative penalties will begin
to accrue if compliance with the order has not been achieved;
5. Either a copy of this Chapter or an explanation of the
consequences of noncompliance with this Chapter and a description of the hearing
procedure and appeal process.
6. The Compliance Order need not be signed by the person
responsible for the violation.
1.44.040 Method of Service. The Compliance Order and all notices
required to be given under this Chapter shall be served by any of the following methods:
A. Personal service; or
B. Certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested. Simulta-
neously, the same notice may be sent by regular mail. If a notice that is sent by certified
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 3 of 10
mail is returned unsigned, then service shall be deemed effective pursuant to regular mail,
provided the notice that was sent by regular mail is not returned.
C. Posting the notice conspicuously on or in front of the property.
Service by certified or regular mail in the manner described above shall be
effective on the date of mailing. Service by mail shall be to the responsible person's
address as indicated on the current assessment roll of the San Diego County Assessor.
1.44.050 Hearing -- Review Board -- Planning Commission or
Advisory and Appeals Board. In any case where a Compliance Order is issued by the
Planning Director, and a hearing is held on said Compliance Order, the hearing shall be
held and a decision rendered by the Planning Commission. In any case where a
Compliance Order is issued by the Fire Chief, the Director of Building and Safety, the
City Engineer or the Director of Public Works, and a hearing is held on said Compliance
Order, the hearing shall be held and a decision rendered by the Advisory and Appeals
Board. For the purposes of this Chapter, the term "Review Board" shall refer to either
the Planning Commission or the Advisory and Appeals Board, as appropriate. In any
case where a hearing is held before the Review Board pursuant to this Chapter, the
Director of the City department which issues the Compliance Order shall serve as the
Secretary of the Review Board.
1.44.060 Hearing
A. If the Director determines that all violations have been corrected
within the time specified in the Compliance Order, no further action shall be taken.
B. If full compliance is not achieved within the time specified in the
Compliance Order, the Director shall advise the secretary to the Review Board to set a
hearing before the Board.
1.44.070 Hearing -- Notice -- Scheduling -- Purpose.
A. The secretary to the Review Board shall cause a written notice of
hearing to be served on the person responsible for the violation, and, where real property
is involved, a notice of hearing shall be served on the property owner at the address as
it appears on the last equalized County assessment roll available on the date the notice is
prepared.
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 4 of 10
B. Every notice of hearing on a Compliance Order shall contain the
date, time and place at which the hearing shall be conducted by the Review Board.
C. Each hearing shall be set for a date not less than fifteen (15) days nor
more than forty-five (45) days from the date of service of the notice of hearing unless the
Director determines that the matter is urgent or that good cause exists for an extension
of time.
D. The purpose of the hearing is to provide the full opportunity for a
person subject to a Compliance Order to object to the determination that a violation has
occurred and/or that the violation has continued to exist, or that the person served with
the Compliance Order is the person responsible for the violation. The failure of any
person subject to a Compliance Order, pursuant to this Chapter, to appear at the hearing
shall constitute a failure to exhaust administrative remedies.
1.44.080 Hearing -- Procedures
A. At the place and time set forth in the notice of hearing, the Review
Board shall conduct a hearing on the Compliance Order issued pursuant to Section
1.44.030.
B. At said hearing, after the Director and any representatives of the City
have presented evidence pertaining to the Compliance Order, the person responsible for
the violation, the property owner, and any interested person may present evidence on the
issue.
1.44.090 Administrative Order
A. Within a reasonable time after all evidence is received and the
hearing is concluded, the Review Board shall render a decision, which shall be set forth
in a written Administrative Order.
B. The Administrative Order shall contain findings on the following
issues with respect to each violation:
1. The existence of the violation.
2. The failure of the person responsible for the violation to take
corrective action within the required time period set forth in the Compliance Order.
Ordinance No. 9 6 -212 2
Page 5 of 10
C. The finding of the Review Board shall be supported by evidence
received at the hearing.
D. If the Review Board finds that no violation has occurred or that the
violation was corrected within the time period specified in the Compliance Order, the
Administrative Order shall contain a finding of those facts.
E. If the Review Board finds that a violation has occurred, that the
violation was not corrected within the time period specified in the Compliance Order, and
that the person responsible for the violation was named in the Compliance Order, the
Administrative Order shall contain a finding of those facts, and shall impose any or all
of the following:
appropriate;
1. An order to correct, including a schedule for correction where
2. Administrative penalties as provided in Section 1.44.100;
3. Administrative costs as provided in Section 1.44.110.
F. The Administrative Order shall be served upon the person responsible
for the violation pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1.44.040.
1.44.100 Administrative Penalties
A. In any case where violation of this Code would otherwise constitute
a misdemeanor, the Review Board may impose administrative penalties for such violation
in an amount not to exceed a maximum of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per day
for each ongoing violation, except that the total administrative penalty shall not exceed
One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) exclusive of administrative costs, interest
and restitution for compliance reinspections, for any related series of violations.
B. In any case where violation of this Code would otherwise constitute
an infraction, the Review Board may impose administrative penalties for such violation
as follows:
1. $100 for a first violation;
2. $200 for a second violation within the same year; and
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 6 of 10
3. $500 for each additional violation in the same year.
C. In determining the amount of the administrative penalty, the Board
may take any or all of the following factors into consideration:
1. The duration of the violation;
2. The frequency, recurrence and number of violations, related
or unrelated, by the same violator;
3. The seriousness of the violation;
4. The good faith efforts of the violator to come into compliance;
5. The economic impact of the penalty on the violator;
6. The impact of the violation on the community;
7. Such other factors as justice may require.
D. Administrative penalties imposed by the Appeals Board shall accrue
from the date specified in the Compliance Order and shall cease to accrue on the date the
violation is corrected as determined by the Director or the Review Board.
E. The Review Board, in its discretion, may suspend the imposition of
applicable penalties for any period of time during which:
1. The violator has filed for necessary permits; and
2. Such permits are required to achieve compliance; and
3. Such permit applications are actively pending before the City,
State or other appropriate governmental agency.
F. Administrative penalties assessed by the Review Board shall be due
by the date specified in the Administrative Order.
G. Administrative penalties assessed by the Review Board are a debt
owed to the City and, in addition to all other means of enforcement, if the violation is
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 7 of 10
located on real property, may be enforced by means of a lien against the real property
on which the violation occurred.
H. If the violation is not corrected as specified in the Review Board's
order to correct, administrative penalties shall continue to accrue on a daily basis until
the violation is corrected, subject to the maximum amount set forth in Subsections (A)
and (B) above.
I. If the violator gives written notice to the Director that the violation
has been corrected and if the Director finds that compliance has been achieved, the
Director shall deem the date the written notice was postmarked or personally delivered
to the Director or the date of the final inspection, whichever first occurred, to be the date
the violation was corrected. If no written notice is provided to the Director, the violation
will be deemed corrected on the date of the final inspection.
1.44.110 Administrative Costs
A. The Review Board shall assess administrative costs against the
violator when it finds that a violation has occurred and that compliance has not been
achieved within the time specified in the Compliance Order.
B. The administrative costs may include any and all costs incurred by
the City in connection with the matter before the Review Board including but not limited
to, costs of investigation, staffing costs incurred in preparation for the hearing and for the
hearing itself, and costs for all reinspections necessary to enforce the Compliance Order.
1.44.120 Failure to Comply with Administrative Order. Failure to
pay the assessed administrative penalties and administrative costs specified in the
Administrative Order of the Review Board may be enforced as:
1. A personal obligation of the violator; and/or
2. If the violation is in connection with real property, a lien upon
the real property. The lien shall remain in effect until all of the administrative penalties,
interest and administrative costs are paid in full.
1.44.130 Right of Judicial Review. Any person aggrieved by an
Administrative Order of the Review Board may obtain review of the Administrative Order
by filing an appeal to be heard with the San Diego County Municipal Court in accordance
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 8 of 10
.
with the timelines and provisions set forth in California Government Code Section
53069.4.
1.44.140 Recovery of Administrative Civil Penalties. The City may
collect the assessed administrative civil penalties and administrative costs by use of all
available legal means, including recordation of a lien pursuant to Section 1.44.170.
1.44.150 Report of Compliance after Administrative Order. If the
Director determines that compliance has been achieved after a Compliance Order has
been sustained by the Review Board, the Director shall file a report indicating that
compliance has been achieved.
1.44.160 Compliance Dispute
A. If the Director does not file a report pursuant to Section 1.44.150
above, a violator who believes that compliance has been achieved may request a
compliance hearing before the Review Board by filing a request for hearing with the
secretary to the Board.
B. The hearing shall be noticed and conducted in the same manner as
a hearing on a Compliance Order provided in Sections 1.44.050 through 1.44.090 of this
Chapter.
C. The Review Board shall determine if compliance has been achieved
and, if so, when it was achieved.
1.44.170 Lien Procedure
A. Whenever the amount of any administrative penalty and/or
administrative cost imposed by the Review Board pursuant to this Chapter in connection
with real property has not been satisfied in full within ninety (90) days of service of the
Administrative Order, and/or has not been successfully challenged by a timely appeal to
the Municipal Court, this obligation may constitute a lien against the real property on
which the violation occurred.
B. The lien provided herein shall have no force and effect until recorded
with the County Recorder. Once recorded, the Administrative Order shall have the force
and effect and priority of a judgment lien governed by the provisions of Sections 697.340
of the Code of Civil Procedure and may be extended as provided in Sections 683.110 to
683.220, inclusive, of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 9 of 10
C. Interest shall accrue on the principal amount of the judgment
remaining unsatisfied pursuant to law.
D. Prior to recording any such lien, the Director of Finance shall
prepare and file with the City Clerk a report stating the amounts due and owing.
E. The City Clerk shall fix a time, date and place for hearing such
report and any protests or objections thereto by City Council.
F. The Director of Finance shall cause written notice to be served on
the property owner not less than ten (10) days prior to the time set for the hearing. Such
notice shall be served as provided in Section 1.44.040.
1.44.180 Public Hearing and Protests
A. Any person whose real property is subject to a lien pursuant to
Section 1.44.170 may file a written protest with the City Clerk and/or may protest orally
at the City Council meeting.
B. Each written protest or objection must contain a description of the
property in which the protesting party is interested and the grounds of such protest or
objection.
C. The City Council, after the hearing, shall adopt a resolution
confirming, discharging or modifying the amount of the lien.
1.44.190 Recording of Lien. Thirty (30) days following the adoption
of a resolution by the City Council imposing a lien, the City Clerk shall file the same as
a judgment lien in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County. The lien
may carry such additional administrative charges as set forth by resolution of the City
Council.
1.44.200 Satisfaction of Lien. Once payment in full is received by the
City for outstanding penalties and costs, the Director of Finance shall either record a
notice of satisfaction or provide the property owner or financial institution with a notice
of satisfaction so they may record this notice with the Office of the County Recorder.
Such notice of satisfaction shall cancel the City's lien.
Ordinance No. 96-2122
Page 10 of 10
PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of September , 1996.
ATTEST:
ori1Anne Peoples, City lerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
/4$1°. fr°
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
George H. aters. Mayor H. aters, Mayor
Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California, on September
3, 1996, by the following vote, to -wit:
Ayes: Council Members Beauchamp, Inzunza, Morrison, Zarate, Waters.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
Abstain: None.
AUTHENTICATED BY:
GEORGE H. WATERS
Mayor of the City of National City, California
Ci Cl: k of the City of National City, alifornia
By:
Deputy
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was not finally adopted until seven
calendar days had elapsed between the days of its introduction and the days of its final
passage, to wit, on August 20, 1996 and on September 3, 1996.
I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT said ordinance was read in full prior to its final passage or
that the reading of said ordinance in full was dispensed with by a vote of not less than a
majority of the members elected to the Council and that there was available for the
consideration of each member of the Council and the public prior to the day of its passage
a written or printed copy of said ordinance.
I FURTHER CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
ORDINANCE NO. 96-2122 of the City Council of the City of National City, passed and
adopted by the Council of said City on September 3, 1996.
City Clerk of the City of National City, California
By:
Deputy