HomeMy WebLinkAboutCouncil Agenda Statement 06-20-1995 Resolution Redevelopment PlanCity of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
BEM TITLE RESOLUTION ADOPTING WRITTEN FINDINGS MID WRITTEN RESPONSES TO WRITTEN
OBJECTIONS RECEIVED IN REGARD TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL CITY
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AS AMENDED
PREPARED BY PAUL E RO ER
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
EXPLANATION
REFER TO PRECEDING INREPORT.
(—invironmental Review _x_N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
LTAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution
DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION (CDC)
BOARD!COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATT.ACHMENTS(Listed Below)
N/A
Account No.
Resolution N95-
o."
A-200 (Rev, 9/ XJ)
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION C. 95-97
WHEREAS, Section 3 3 3 3 of the Community Redevelopment Law,
requires that before adopting the Amended Redevelopment Plan, the
City Council must make written findings in response to each written
objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity,
addressing such objections in detail and giving reasons for not
accepting specified objections and suggestions; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the CDC staff to
respond to written objections received from affected property
owners and taxing entities, giving reasons for not accepting
specified objections and suggestions, and the City Council has
reviewed such responses; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has heard and considered all
evidence, both written and oral, presented in support of and in
opposition to the adoption of the Amendment.
WOW, T E EFOE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the
City of National City, as follows:
section 1. The City Council hereby finds that the City
Council and the CDC have duly complied with all the provisions,
requirements, and procedures of the Community Redevelopment Law,
relating to the preparation and adoption of Amendment,
Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that all persons
have had the opportunity to be heard or to file a written objection
to the proposed Amendment.
Section 3. Having heard and carefully reviewed all oral
objections presented at the joint public hearing on the Amendment,
the City Council hereby finds and determines that sound reasons
exist in the record o.f the joint public hearing (including, without
limitation, testimony presented by the CDC staff in response to
justify such oral objections) to adoption of the Amendment, with
the exception that all single-family residential properties and the
parcels zoned TM south of 32nd Street and north of State Route 5 .
between Highland Avenue and "D" Avenue (Swap Meet) be excluded from
the Eminent Domain provisions of the Amended Plan, as proposed,
notwithstanding such oral objections, and such oral objections are,
accordingly, overruled,
section 4. Having heard and carefully reviewed all written
objections presented by each affected property owner or taxing
entity, the City Council hereby makes the required written findings
and responses to such written objections (on file in the office of
Page 2 of 3 1,A.
CITY COUNCIL
RESOLUTION NO, - 97
the City Clerk), and determines that the responses to written
objections are . supported by substantial evidence, and (ii) there
are sound reasons to justify adoption of the Amendment as proposed,
notwithstanding such written objections.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 2 t i day of June •
ATTEST:
Lori Anne People, City Clerk
APPROVED TO FORM
George H. Eiser, III
City -CDC Attorney
CCRcspcxi. CtES
George H. Waters, Mayor
...
Page 3 of 3 1.A.