HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988 CC RESO 15,784RESOLUTION NO. 15784
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT
WITH COMP PLUS FOR COMP PLUS TO PERFORM A SURVEY
OF POLICE BENEFITS AND WORKING CONDITIONS, AND
AUTHORIZING A TRANSFER OF FUNDS TO MEET
NECESSARY BUDGET REQUIREMENTS
WHEREAS, the City of National City has published a
request for proposals to perform a survey of Police benefits and
working conditions; and
WHEREAS, based upon review of all proposals to perform
such services, it was determined that Comp Plus is the lowest
responsive bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of National City hereby awards a contract for Survey of
Police Benefits and Working Conditions to:
COMP PLUS, a Division of William Hamilton & Associates
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby
authorized to execute on behalf of the City, a contract between
COMP PLUS and the City of National City to perform this survey
consistent with the request for proposals published by the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of National City that it hereby authorizes and directs the
following transfer of funds be made in order to meet necessary
budget requirements:
AMOUNT: $5,950.00
FROM: 001-2411
Unappropriated Reserves
TO: 001-411-000-299
Police Operations -Contract Services
PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of November, 1988.
ATTEST:
Ion Campbell, CitI Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GEORGE/ . WATERS, Mayor
George H. Eiser, III, City Attorney
PROPOSAL
FOR
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
SURVEY OF POLICE BENEFITS
AND WORKING CONDITIONS
October 14, 1988
Cp
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
I. INTRODUCING COMP PLUS 1
II. FIRM REFERENCES 2
III. PROJECT TEAM 4
IV. WORK PLAN AND METHODOLOGY 6
A. Project Understanding 6
B. Working Program 6
1. Scope 6
2. Objectives 7
3. Process 7
C. Project Report 8
V. PROJECT TIMELINE 9
VI. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND CONDITIONS 10
Cp
I. INTRODUCING COMP PLUS
Cp
I. INTRODUCING COMP PLUS
The Firm
Comp Plus is a newly formed subsidiary of William Hamilton & Associates,
a management consulting firm which is dedicated to the improvement of
public services through the effective management of personnel resources.
We build on existing client strengths by integrating our efforts with
the goals and objectives of each organization. As a result, we have
gained a reputation for providing custom -designed programs for a broad
array of clients: over 300 cities, counties, school districts, special
districts, and quasi -public entities throughout the western United
States. Our consulting services within the fields of organization and
management, personnel administration, and productivity improvement are
provided on a project or continuing contractual basis.
One of the features of our firm that enables us to tailor our services
so well is the diverse experience and educational backgrounds of our
associates. Comp Plus is represented by associates who come from all
over the country with educations in business, public administration,
planning, economics, law, and the sciences. Their backgrounds include
exposure to both public and private sector firms, from major corpora-
tions to small local governments. This diversity allows a problem or
project to be evaluated and solutions identified based on examination
from many different perspectives. Thus, the prospect that an effective
and successful program can be designed to match a client's needs is
virtually assured.
Comp Plus is especially well-equipped to meet the needs of the City of
Nation City. The project contemplated by the City is the type that Comp
Plus was created to address. Position classification and compensation
studies are the firm's area of specialization. We fully recognize the
value to an organization in a position classification and pay plan which
appropriately address the needs of both management and employees. Our
extensive involvement with classification and compensation programs and
issues have armed the firm with an extensive collection of resources
which will allow us to more than adequately respond to the City's needs.
Cp
II. FIRM REFERENCES
Cp
II. FIRM REFERENCES
The following is a representative list of clients for whom we have
conducted studies similar to the one requested by the City. Additional
references will be provided on request.
David Carmany, City Manager
City of Agoura Hills
(818) 889-9114
Kevin Murphy, City Manager
City of Alhambra
(818) 570-5014
Richard Rowe, City Manager
City of Chino
(714) 627-7577
Bridgette Distlerath, Assistant
to the City Manager
City of Claremont
(714) 624-4531
Peggy Madsen, Personnel Director
City of Colton
(714) 370-5063
Theron Nelson, Personnel Director
City of Concord
(415) 671-3000
Fred Weiner, Assistant to the
City Manager
City of El Segundo
(213) 322-4531
Thomas Pratt, Personnel Director
City of Fremont
(415) 791-4203
James M. Evans, City Manager
City of Glendora
(818) 914-8210
Janice E. Wiess, Director of
Personnel
City of Henderson, Nevada
(702) 565-2070
D. J. Collins, General Manager
Hesperia Water District
(619) 244-6154
Karl Kemp, General Manager
Mesa Consolidated Water District
(714) 631-1200
Richard Dippner, General Manager
Mission Springs Water District
(619) 329-6448
Joe Goeden, City Administrator
City of Montebello
(213) 725-1200
- 2
Cp
Pat Andrews, Personnel Officer
City of Norwalk
(213) 929-2677
Carl Hatfield, City Manager
City of Rancho Mirage
(619) 324-4511
Pam Nikoli, Assistant City Manager
City of San Rafael
(415) 456-1112
Mary Ann Reiss, Personnel Director
City of Upland
(714) 982-1352
Jane Herran, Personnel Director Scott Duncan, Assistant City
City of San Fernando Manager
(818) 365-2541 City of Victorville
(714) 245-3411
Bob Clute, City Administrator
City of San Gabriel
(213) 308-2800
Myra Fry, Personnel Director
City of West Covina
(818) 962-8631
Cp
III. PROJECT TEAM
Cp
III. PROJECT TEAM
Comp Plus has assembled a team of experienced analysts to conduct the
classification and compensation study requested by the City. A brief
resume for each of the project members follows:
Buford Nichols
During Nick's 20+ year career, he has served as a Management Consultant,
Assistant City Manager, Personnel Director, Administrative Assistant,
and Personnel Analyst. He has personally conducted or supervised
position classification and salary studies encompassing over 50,000
positions in a variety of public and private agencies, including special
districts, cities, counties, school districts, and regional planning.
agencies. These studies involved the application of modern position
classification and pay methods, including whole job and point systems.
Nick has a master's degree in public administration.
Marta Rebella
An accomplished personnel professional, Marta's background includes over
seven years of experience with the County of Orange in the conduct of
classification and compensation studies. Marta participated in adminis-
tration of the Orange County Cooperative Salary Survey, a survey
involving over 100 private and public employees. She also directed the
County recruitment and selection program and conducted special studies
for the Board of Supervisors. As a line manager over a major division
of the Health Care Agency, she supervised in excess of 100 employees
with an operating budget of 3 million +. Since joining the firm, Marta
has conducted classification and compensation studies for a variety of
public agencies. Marta has a bachelor's degree in sociology and has
attended numerous training programs involving the field ct persci.:,ei
administration.
Karen Verney
Karen's background includes ten years of diverse consulting, managerial
and administrative experience with public and private sector organiza-
tions. She has developed, conducted, or administered a variety of
compensation and benefits, performance appraisal, employee communica-
tions, and recruitment/selection programs. Since joining the firm,
Karen has conducted and participated in classification and compensation
- 4 -
Cp
studies for public agency clients. Karen received her bachelor's degree
in Industrial Management, and is affiliated with the American Society of
Personnel Administration and the American Compensation Association.
Phil Gardiol
Phil has over eighteen years of consulting experience with private and
public sector organizations. He has served as a guest faculty member at
USG and Cal State, Los Angeles, in the schools of management and
business. Phil has developed a number of successful performance
improvement programs in both clerical and manufacturing environments.
Under his direction, a consulting group employed by a major insurance
company installed a series of programs designed to improve manual
systems. These programs produced work measurement, methods improvement,
and incentive systems for 2,800 employees. Phil's approach includes a
high degree of management involvement as well as the development of
skills that enable clients to effectively monitor and maintain programs
on an ongoing basis.
- 5
Cp
IV. WORK PLAN AND METHODOLOGY
Cp
IV. WORK PLAN AND METHODOLOGY
A. Project Understanding
Apparently the City and NCPOA were unable to arrive at a Memorandum
of Understanding during the meet and confer process held earlier
this year. In the absence of agreement, the City Council unilater-
ally implemented certain changes in salaries and benefits. Since
that time, discussions have been held between the City and Associa-
tion in the interest of resolving concerns regarding supplemental
(fringe) benefits and working conditions. There is a question as to
whether the City's program favorably compares with those of other
law enforcement agencies in San Diego County.
The City is interested in obtaining professional consulting services
to conduct a comprehensive benefits and working conditions survey
for the following classes: Police Lieutenant, Police Sergeant,
Police Officer, Dispatcher Matron, and Animal Control Officer. The
survey is to include 8 police departments and the San Diego
Sheriff's Department. Items to be surveyed include essentially all
benefits and working conditions common to the represented occupa-
tional fields. The consultant is to develop the survey collection
document, conduct the survey, and provide a summary of the benefits
and prevailing practices or working conditions.
Of singular importance to the City is the accuracy of the survey and
its acceptance as being legitimate by both the City and NCPOA. To
this end Study processes are to provide for input by the NCPOA on
survey procedures, informative sessions with representatives of
NCPOA, and a review of survey results with the Association.
B. Working Program
1. Scope
We propose to conduct a survey of City designated benefits and
working conditions which apply to classes represented by the
NCPOA. Eight police departments and the San Diego Sheriff's
Department will constitute the survey agencies.
- 6
Cp
2. Objectives
a. Recommend for City and NCPOA approval the benefits and
working conditions to be surveyed.
b. Conduct a benefits and working conditions survey which
results in a data base which can be relied upon as correctly
reflecting practices in the survey agencies.
c. Present a survey data analysis summary/analysis on each
survey class.
3. Process
a. Meet with representative(s) from the City and NCPOA to
review study objectives, methods, principles, and the role
of management/employees in the project. This step is
designed to ensure a full understanding of study objectives
by all parties and to ensure that the approach taken fully
address the City's needs and desires.
b. Compile and review information on the classes to be surveyed
and related policies, procedures, rules, benefits, and
working conditions.
c. Conduct a review of the City's Police Department including
functions, number and type of personnel, budget, organiza-
tion, work processes and work flow, procedures, and manage-
ment policies.
d. Interview representatives of the City and NCPOA to define
problem areas and promote involvement in the Study.
e. Identify for approval the benefits and working conditions to
be surveyed and review the selected benefits and working
conditions with representatives from the City and NCPOA.
f. Review proposed formats for the presentation of benefits and
working conditions data with the City. This step is
designed to ensure that the Study will result in the City/
- 7
Cp
NCPOA obtaining such information as may be relevant to its
consideration of police benefits and working conditions.
g. Conduct a survey of agency benefits and working conditions.
The surveys will involve on -site visits and telephone
contacts with survey agency personnel to ensure accurate
class comparisons and an understanding of relevant programs.
Comparisons will be made on the basis of duties and respons-
ibilities of positions rather than simple matching of titles
and/or organizational level. This method will ensure that
reported benefits and working conditions accurately reflect
market conditions for the positions surveyed.
h. Present benefits and working conditions data gathered during
the compensation survey for the City in the format desired
by the City.
C. Project Report
We propose to submit a Project Report that will describe overall
project activities and findings. The report will include, but not
be limited to, the following:
1. A narrative explaining study principles, procedures, con-
clusions, and recommendations.
2. A summary of the activities included in the study.
3. A statement of the problems identified as a result of the study
with recommendations for addressing such problems.
4. Benefits and working conditions survey data sheets for the
specified police classes.
- 8
Cp
V. PROJECT TIMELINE
Cp
TASKS
ORIENTATION
V. PROJECT TIMELINE
- Meet with representatives from City
and NCPOA to review Study.
SURVEY
- Determine benefits and working
conditions.
- Review survey benefits and working
conditions with representatives
from the City and NCPOA.
- Request survey data, conduct survey
- Compile benefits and working
conditions data.
- Review data with City and NCPOA.
- Address City/NCPOA concerns.
PROJECT REPORTS
- Submit preliminary report
- Address necessary revisions for the
final report
- Prepare and submit the project report
MONTH
NOV.
DEC.
JAN.
9
Cp
VI. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND CONDITIONS
Cp
VI. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION AND CONDITIONS
Comp Plus, hereinafter referred to as Consultant, shall:
1. Provide forms, recommend processes, and assist in disseminating
information pertinent to the study.
2. Participate in meetings with management and employee organiza-
tion representatives to review study processes, findings, and
recommendations.
3. Accomplish the preceding as Consultants reporting directly to
such representative(s) each City may direct.
4. Start the herein described study within ten (10) days after
notification of proposal approval. The Final Project Report
will be submitted to the City on or before January 15, 1989,
assuming project initiation on or before November 1, 1988.
5. Rely upon City assistance only to the extent of arranging and
scheduling interviews and group meetings with employee organiza-
tion representatives and/or management; making all necessary
records available; encouraging expeditious decisions on matters
affecting the conduct of the project.
6. Conduct the Survey_ described herein for a total fee of
$3,950.00.
The fee will be due and payable in three (3) equal installments:
the first upon initiation of the study, the second after thirty -
days, and the final installment upon delivery of the Final
Project Report.
- 10 -
Cp
41.
We are extremely pleased at the prospect of being of service to the City
of National City. If the City is receptive to the proposal as outlined
herein, the signature below of an authorized representative will suffice
as authorization for us to proceed with the study.
COMP PLUS
Bu �%rd N' hols
Pr•sident
lc
10-14-88
NTNL-CTY.PRP
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
By.
Title
Date
Cp