HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 15,398RESOLUTION NO. 15,398
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'ttiS
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DENYING
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION FOR THE
SALE OF USED CARPETING AT 1469 EAST PLAZA BLVD.
APPLICANT: W. A. BOHART, JR.
CASE FILE NO. CUP-1987-6
WHEREAS, the appeal by the City Council of the Planning Commission's
approval of Conditional Use Permit application (CUP-1987-6) was considered by
the City Council of the City of National City at a public hearing held on August
11, 1987, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the City Council considered the entire
contents of Case File No. CUP-1987-6 which is maintained by the City, and
incorporated herein by reference; and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required
by State and City law; and,
WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the
preservation of public health, safety and general welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City bf National
City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council
at the public hearing held on August 11, 1987, support the following findings:
A. That the site is not adequate in size and shape, because large trucks
picking up and delivering carpet will travel and be parked in the
parking lot which is heavily utilized during business hours of the
center, and additional truck deliveries and possible cutting of carpet
in the parking lot would increase congestion for circulation and
parking.
B. That the site does not have sufficient access to streets and highways
that are adequate in both width and pavement type to carry the quantity
and quality of traffic generated by the proposed use, because large
trucks picking up and delivering rolls of carpet will take access from
Plaza Blvd., a heavily traveled arterial roadway.
C. That the proposed use will have an adverse effect upon adjacent or
abutting properties, because large delivery trucks delivering rolls of
carpeting and cutting of carpet in the parking lot will be visible from
abutting properties and streets.
D. That the proposed use is not deemed essential and desirable to the
public convenience or welfare, because it is not complementary to
adjacent restaurants and retail uses, and the use would encourage other
used merchandise sales, which are not compatible with existing uses, to
locate in the area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby denies the conditional
use permit application no. CUP-1987-6; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution shall be transmitted
forthwith to the applicant; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final
on the day following the City Council meeting where the resolution is adopted.
The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed
by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure: Section 1094.6.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1987.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Campbell, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III -City Attorney