HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 13,480RESOLUTION NO. 13,480
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL
CITY ADOPTING THE AREAWIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY PLAN
WHEREAS, the San Diego region's housing market is not
meeting the need for affordable housing, especially for lower income
households; and
WHEREAS, the lack of affordable housing creates an economic and
social strain upon the San Diego region's prosperity; and
WHEREAS, the local jurisdictions in the San Diego region have
adopted the San Diego Association of Governments' Housing Allocation
Formula and the Regional Housing Plan which demonstrates a commitment
to address their "Fair Share" of the region's lower income housing
needs; and
WHEREAS, the local jurisdictions have expressed a need and
developed actions to address the lower income housing needs through
their Housing Elements and/or Housing Assistance Plans; and
WHEREAS, the Areawide Housing Opportunity Plan will enable
the region to compete for additional housing subsidies and to be
involved in the allocation of assisted housing resources;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of National City
recognizes the housing needs and supports the goals as recommended in
the Areawide Housing Opportunity Plan except as follows: the City of
National City has mandates from its voters pursuant to Article XXXIV
of the California Constitution favoring construction of 150 low rent
housing units for elderly persons and 50 low rent housing units for
families. These mandates alter goals as shown on pages 79 and 80 of
the Areawide Housing Opportunity Plan;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of National City will
continue to provide housing for lower income households within its
jurisdiction through all reasonable programs and activities.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 2nd day of December, 1980.
Kile Morgan, yor.
ATTEST:
Ion: Campbell, Cit / Clerk
TABLE 12-10
LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLD ASSISTANCE
BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE AND TENURE
ONE YEAR GOALS
NATIONAL CITY
Tenure and Type
of Housing Assistance
Number of Lower Income
Households to be Assisted
Total
Elderly/
Handicapped
Small
Family
Large
Family
1. Homeowner Goals
a. New Construction
0
0
0
0
b. Rehabilitation
12
4
6
2
c. Total Owner Units
• 12
4
6
2
d. Percentage
100.0
33.3
50.0
16.7
2. Renter Goals
a. New Construction
50
0
50
0
b. Rehabilitation
11
2
8
1
c. Existing
21
5
13
3
d. Total Renter Units
82
7
71
4
e. Percentage
100.0
8.5
86.6
4.9
3. Total Goals
a. Number Units
94
11
77
6
b. Percentage
100.0
11.7
81.9
6.4
-79
TABLE 13-10
LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLD ASSISTANCE
BY HOUSEHOLD TYPE AND TENURE
THREE YEAR GOALS
NATIONAL CITY
Tenure and Type
of Housing Assistance
Number of Lower Income
Households to be Assisted
Total
Elderly/
Handicapped
Small
Family
Large
Family
1. Homeowner Goals
a. New Construction
0
0
0
0
b. Rehabilitation
35
13
17
' 5
c. Total Owner Units
35
13
17
5
d. Percentage
100.0
37.1
48.6
14.3
2. Renter Goals
a. New Construction
50
0
50
0
b. Rehabilitation
34
6
25
3
c. Existing
65
15
40
10
d. Total Renter Units
149
21
115
13
e. Percentage
100.0
14.1
77.2
8.7
3. Total Goals
a. Number Units
184
34
132
18
b. Percentage
100.0
18.5
71.7
9.8
DATE: 11/17/80
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AGENDA REPORT No.: R
54
AREAWIDE HOUSING OPPORTUNITY PLAN (AHOP)
Introduction
The Board of Directors accepted the draft of the tables for the Areawide
Housing Opportunity Plan (HOP) for distribution at its August, 1980 meeting.
Since then, CPO staff has met with local staffs to review the tables and has
converted the information to the retired AHOP application format. Staff is
now scheduling the recommended AHOP for adoption with the City Councils and
the Board of Supervisors so that the CPO Board of Directors can take action
at its December meeting. This report describes the adoption schedule and the
basic concepts and implications of the AHOP.
Discussion
The AHOP contains an assessment of lower income households by jurisdiction
(see attachment, Table 20), the distribution of the regional lower income
household needs among the jurisdictions (see Table 20), the identification
of one and three year goals for lower income housing assistance by juris-
diction (see attachment, Table 22), an identification of jurisdictions needing
additional lower income housing resources, an analysis of the barriers to lower
inane housing and a list of activities recommended to implement the Plan.
The AHOP is similar to the Housing Assistance Plans (HAP) that all the local
jurisdictions have adopted (either directly or indirectly through the County
of San Diego) as part of the Community Development Block Grant (CMG) appli-
cation process. The basic -difference between the AHOP and the various HAP's,
besides the regional scale, is that the AHOP redistributes lower income housing
needs among the local jurisdictions based upon CPO's adopted Housing Allocation
Formula. The Formula (adopted in March 1980) identifies each jurisdiction's
housing allocation percentage and the number of additional lower inane housing
units that each jurisdiction should provide. The AHOP builds upon the formula
by identifying the total lower inane households that require assistance.
However, the AHOP goals for new construction are reflective of the Housing
Allocation Formula's goals for additional units.
If the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) approves the
AHOP, several advantages could be realized by the San Diego region:
1. The lower inane housing needs and definitions that have to be identified
in the HAP's could become regionally consistent. Local jurisdictions could
substitute the AHOP data and tables in their HAP's, and thus be relieved of
this often burdensome technical process, and devote more energy to program
implementation.
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING ORGANIZATION OF THE SAN DIEGO REGION9310
page 2
2. The Region would qualify to coniete for HUD discretionary funds. The AHOP
outreach communities could receive additional CDBG, assisted housing, and
planning resources to support local efforts in addressing lower income
housing goals.
3. All jurisdictions would have a direct role in HUD's assisted housing
allocation process that occurs each fiscal year. Upon approval of the
AHOP by HUD, the Department's allocations must comply with the AHOP.
Thus, the local governments, through the AHOP, would have a direct
impact upon the allocation of federal resources within the region.
4. The goals contained in the AHOP can be more realistically achieved than
the substantially higher HAP goals that have been adopted by the juris-
dictions. Thus, the local governments' commitments to provide for lower
income households in the AHOP would be more reflective of local cap-
abilities.
5. The regional goal of a more equitable distribution of assisted housing
resources in accordance with the fair share formula would be reinforced.
Attachments
TABLE 20
LOWER INCOME HOUSING ASSISTANCE NEEDS,
BY JURISDICTION, 1980-1983
SAN DIEGO REGION
Jurisdiction
In -Place
Percentage
In -Place .
Households
ETRa
Percentage
ETRa
Households
Total
Households
Total
Percent
Carlsbad
2.0
2,417
2.5
310
2,727
2.0
Chula Vista
4.8
5,800
5.0
619
6,419
4,8
Coronado
1.3
1,571
1.1
136
1,707
1.3
Del Mar
0.3
362
0.3
37
399
0.3
El Cajon
3.8
4,592
3.7
458
5,050
3.8
Escondido
3.6 •
4,350
3.7
458
4,808
3.6
Imperial Beach
0.7
846
0.6
74
920
0.7
La Mesa
3.0
3,625
3.2
396
4,021
3.0
Lemon Grove
1.1
1,329
1.1
136
1,465
1.1
National City
1.9
2,296
1.3
161
2,457
1.8
Oceanside
3.9
4,712
4.3
532
5,244
3.9
San Diego
47.3
57,157
44.2
5,472
62,629
47.0
San Marcos
1.3
1,571
1.7
210
1,781
1.3
Vista
2.0
2,417
2.2
272
2,689
2.0
Unincorporated
23.1
27,914
25.3
3,132
31,046
23.3
Region Total
100.0
120,959b
100.0
12,403b
133,362
100.0
O
aETR: "Expected to Reside," a term referring to the number of low-income households forecast to be added in each
jurisdiction during 1980-83.
bDue to rounding of percentages in preceding columns, a multiplier of 120,840 in Column 2 and 12,381 in Column 4 had
to be used to equal control totals for those columns.
TABLE 22
LOWER INCOME HOUSEHOLD ASSISTANCE GOALS
BY JURISDICTION 1980-1983
SAN DIEGO REGION
Jurisdiction
Households To Be Assisted.
In Place
Expected -To -Reside
Total
Percent
Number
Percent
Number
Carlsbad
2.0
181
2.5
23
204
Chula Vista
4.8
435
5.0
47
482
Coronado
1.3
118
1.1
10
128
Del Mar
0.3
27
0,3
3
30
El Cajon
3.8
344
3.7
34
378
Escondido
3.6
326
3.7
34
360
Imperial Beach
0.7
63
0.6
6
69
La Mesa
3.0
272
3.2
30
302
Lemon Grove
1.1
100
1.1
10
110
National City
1.9
172
1.3
12
184
Oceanside
3.9
353
4.3
40
393
San Diego
47.3
4,287
44.2
411
4,698
San Marcos
1.3
118
1.7
16
134
Vista
2.0
181
2.2
20
201
Unincorporated
23.1
2,094
25.3
235
2,329
Region Total
100.0
9,071 1
100.0
931
10,002
10ue to rounding in Column 1 - 9,063 was used as multiplier to equal region total need (9,0711.