Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 95-97RESOLUTION NO. 95-97 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADOPTING WRITTEN FINDINGS AND WRITTEN RESPONSES TO WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED IN REGARD TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AS AMENDED WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City (the "City Council") did duly pass and adopt Ordinance No. 91-2013 on June 18, 1991, and did thereby adopt and approve the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project (the "Redevelopment Plan"); and, WHEREAS, the City Council did duly pass and adopt Ordinance No. 94-2086 on November 22, 1994 and did thereby revise certain time limitations set forth in the Redevelopment Plan in compliance with Section 33333.6 of the Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code Sections 33000, et. seq. (the "Community Redevelopment Law"); and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (the "CDC") has undertaken the required steps for the consideration of the adoption of a proposed amendment (the "Amendment") to the Redevelopment Plan; and, WHEREAS, a draft Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project as Amended (the "Amended Redevelopment Plan") has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law; and, WHEREAS, on June 13, 1995, at a joint meeting of the City Amendment was conducted by the joint meeting was continued to a duly noticed joint public hearing Council and the CDC on the proposed City Council and the CDC, and said June 20, 1995; and, WHEREAS, any and all persons having any objections to the proposed Amendment or the regularity of the proceedings, were given an opportunity to submit written comments prior to the commencement of or at the joint public hearing, or to give oral testimony at the joint public hearing, and show cause why the proposed Amendment should not be adopted; and, Page 1 of 3 1.A. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 95-97 WHEREAS, Section 33363 of the Community Redevelopment Law, requires that before adopting the Amended Redevelopment Plan, the City Council must make written findings in response to each written objection of an affected property owner or taxing entity, addressing such objections in detail and giving reasons for not accepting specified objections and suggestions; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the CDC staff to respond to written objections received from affected property owners and taxing entities, giving reasons for not accepting specified objections and suggestions, and the City Council has reviewed such responses; and, WHEREAS, the City Council has heard and considered all evidence, both written and oral, presented in support of and in opposition to the adoption of the Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of National City, as follows: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds that the City Council and the CDC have duly complied with all the provisions, requirements, and procedures of the Community Redevelopment Law, relating to the preparation and adoption of Amendment. Section 2. The City Council hereby finds that all persons have had the opportunity to be heard or to file a written objection to the proposed Amendment. Section 3. Having heard and carefully reviewed all oral objections presented at the joint public hearing on the Amendment, the City Council hereby finds and determines that sound reasons exist in the record of the joint public hearing (including, without limitation, testimony presented by the CDC staff in response to such oral objections) to justify adoption of the Amendment, with the exception that all single-family residential properties and the parcels zoned ML south of 32nd Street and north of State Route 54 between Highland Avenue and "D" Avenue (Swap Meet) be excluded from the Eminent Domain provisions of the Amended Plan, as proposed, notwithstanding such oral objections, and such oral objections are, accordingly, overruled. Section 4. Having heard and carefully reviewed all written objections presented by each affected property owner or taxing entity, the City Council hereby makes the required written findings and responses to such written objections (on file in the office of Page 2 of 3 1.A. CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 95- 97 the City Clerk), and determines that (i) the responses to written objections are supported by substantial evidence, and (ii) there are sound reasons to justify adoption of the Amendment as proposed, notwithstanding such written objections. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June 1995. ATTEST: Lo iAnne People, City Clerk P APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City -CDC Attorney CCRespon.RPS George H. Waters, Mayor Page 3 of 3 1.A.