Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 97-102RESOLUTION NO, 97-102 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY OPPOSING THE "GOVERNMENT COST SAVINGS AND TAXPAYERS' PROTECTION AMENDMENT," ALSO KNOWN AS THE "PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS IN CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT (PECG) INITIATIVE" WHEREAS, every day billions of dollars of critical building, engineering and design projects are underway from seismic retrofitting to flood control to schools and hospitals; and WHEREAS, state, regional and local governments are currently allowed the flexibility to contract with private firms, on a competitive basis, to design these projects; and WHEREAS, this process allows government the essential flexibility to use private firms to deliver a project on time and cost effectively; and WHEREAS, the so-called "Government Cost Savings and Taxpayers Protection Amendment," also known as the "Professional Engineers in California Government (PECG) Initiative," completely changes the process by giving the state bureaucracy a virtual monopoly on designing every project; and WHEREAS, this will force cities, counties, schools, special districts, regional governments and even many private businesses to use the state bureaucracy to design roads, parks, hospitals, health clinics, schools, water treatment facilities, flood control walls and other critical structures - including all engineering, design, geological and environmental work; and WHEREAS, virtually every school and hospital constructed to date has been designed by private firms, not state government; and WHEREAS, the proposed initiative eliminates local control and forces communities to rely on the out-of-town state bureaucracy for their design work; and WHEREAS, local governments would not be able to hold the state bureaucracy accountable; and WHEREAS, the initiative gives one state official enormous power to decide who gets tens of thousands of design and building projects worth billions of dollars; and WHEREAS, the state controller would have to analyze tens of thousands of proposed contracts per year costing taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not millions, in additional expenses; and WHEREAS, to meet potential workload demands, hundreds, if not thousands, of state employees would need to be employed and paid, even if no projects were underway; and Resolution No. 97-102 Page Two WHEREAS, taxpayers would pick up the tab for billions of dollars in extra costs for projects, lost jobs and more state employees to evaluate projects; and WHEREAS, this could mean more delays on important projects such as the Bay Bridge retrofit and the Alameda Rail Corridor in Los Angeles County. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City opposes the so-called "Government Cost Savings and Taxpayers Protection Amendment" that will cost our cities, counties, special districts and economy millions. PASSED and ADOPTED this 5th day of August, 1997. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: el R. Dalla,/City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney