Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 2000-93RESOLUTION NO. 2000-93 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 38-UNIT MOTEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 71H STREET AND ROOSEVELT AVENUE APPLICANT: RAMAN V. PATEL CASE FILE NO. PD-1999-4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City considered a Planned Development Permit application to allow a 38-unit motel at the northeast corner of 7th Street and National City Boulevard at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of July 18, 2000 at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the City Council considered the staff report prepared for Case File Nos. PD-1999-4 and IS-1999-5, which is maintained by the City, and incorporated herein by reference; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State and City law; and, WHEREAS, this action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council at the public hearing held on July 18, 2000 support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the 23,958 square foot site exceeds the minimum 10,000 square foot lot size identified in City Codes for motel use, and since the project site plan includes parking, landscaping, and a pool to serve the use in compliance with City Code requirements. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the project is located on a collector street and nearby 8th Street is capable of handling the minimal increase in traffic that will be generated by the use. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the proposed motel complies with Design Guidelines and will be compatible with adjacent hotel/motel and commercial uses. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the proposed use is encouraged by the Tourist -Commercial Zoning of the property and is in the Motel -Planned Development Combining Zone area designed to allow for the development of this type of use. CONTINUE ON PAGE 2 Resolution No. 2000-93 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council has considered the proposed Negative Declaration No. IS-1999-5, together with any comments received during the public review process, and finds on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, approves the Negative Declaration, and authorizes the filing of a Notice of Determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Electrical, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations. 2. A drainage plan/grading plan showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off - site improvements shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer or other qualified professional, and shall be in accordance with City requirements. The plan shall show catch basins and proposed parking lot drainage along with all existing and proposed elevations. 3. All surface runoff, including landscaping adjoining the public right-of-way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities, and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface runoff that results from this development. 4. The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all proposed and existing irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way, and shall adjust the sprinkler heads so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk, or the streets. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner, its successors or assigns shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right-of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. 5. For P.V.C. irrigation lines in the public right-of-way, a metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of the lines. 6. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for Engineering Department review. The report shall address the stability of all existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure, and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. At a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2-inch A.C. over 4-inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 modified. CONTINUE ON PAGE 3 Resolution No. 2000-93 Page 3 7. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of- way shall be at least 6-inch in size with a clean -out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 8. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 9. The existing street improvements along property frontages shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers or other approved methods. 10. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the National City Engineering Department. 11. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and for grading construction on private property. 12. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvement, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. The requirements are for grading above 50 cubic yards. 13. All missing street improvements (i.e., curbs) shall be constructed and damaged portions of the sidewalk shall be replaced in accordance with City standards. Abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. 14. Before this Planned Development Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of Planned Development Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 15. Use authorized by this Planned Development Permit shall be limited to a motel in conformance with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-1999-4, dated Dec. 9, 1999. CONTINUE ON PAGE 4 Resolution No. 2000-93 Page 4 16. Except as required by conditions of approval, plans for future permits shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-1999-4, dated Dec. 9, 1999. 17. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 18. A trash enclosure shall be provided in accordance with City standards. It shall have a stucco exterior finish to match the building. 19. The property owner shall submit a letter to the Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the Authority for any water facility improvements required for the proposed motel. 20. The perimeter wall shown on the plans shall have a stucco finish to match the building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution shall be transmitted forthwith to the applicant; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the resolution is adopted. The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 2000. GEORGE WATERS, ATAYOR ATTEST: H EL R. DAL APPROVED AS TO FORM: SW GEORGE H. ISER, III -CITY ATTORNEY MIC A, CITY CLERK