HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 2001 - 30RESOLUTION NO. 2001-30
A "RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY DENYING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A 93-UNIT EXTENDED STAY
HOTEL AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PLAZA
BOULEVARD AND INTERSTATE 805. APPLICANT: EXTENDED
STAY AMERICA. CASE FILE NO. PD-2000-9."
This Resolution was not adopted at the City Council Meeting of
March 6, 2001
DATE: March 6, 2001
Mic ael R. Dal!. , CMC
City Clerk of the
City of National City
no-c Pc� oQ-c
RESOLUTION NO. 2001— 30
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DENYING A
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR A 93-UNIT EXTENDED STAY HOTEL AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF PLAZA BOULEVARD
AND INTERSTATE 805.
(Applicant: Extended Stay America)
(Case File No. PD-2000-9)
WHEREAS, the appeal to the City Council of the Planning Commission's denial
of a Planned Development Permit application (PD-2000-9) was considered by the City Council
of the City of National City at a public hearing held on February 27, 2001, at which time oral and
documentary evidence was presented; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the City Council considered the staff report
contained in Case File Nos. PD-2000-9 which is maintained by the City, and incorporated herein
by reference; and
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by
State and City law; and
WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation
of public health, safety and general welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council at the
public hearing held on February 27, 2001 fail to support findings, required by the Municipal
Code for granting any Planned Development Permit, that the proposed use will not have an
adverse effect on adjacent or abutting properties, and that the proposed use is deemed essential
and desirable to the public convenience or welfare.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City,
California, that the testimony and evidence presented to City Council at the public hearing held
on February 27, 2001 support the following findings:
1. That the proposed use will have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since
the rooms have the potential to be used as small, long-term studio apartments without the
necessary parking and open space for such use, and since the project will not include the
required on -site manager's unit to ensure users of the facility do not disrupt adjacent
properties.
2. That the proposed use will have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties,
because the size of the project and height of the buildings proposed to be constructed,
together with the traffic generated by the project, make the project incompatible with the
adjacent residential neighborhood.
Resolution No. 2001 — 30
March 6, 2001
Page 2 of 2
2. That the proposed use is not deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience
and welfare, as reflected in the Land Use Code, which requires a manager's unit and
prohibits hotel stays longer than 30 days and kitchenette facilities in hotels, and the City
Council considered but denied Code amendments to delete the requirement for a
manager's unit and to allow kitchen facilities and unlimited stays.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby denies Planned
Development Permit Application No. PD-2000-9.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and
final on the day following the City Council meeting where the resolution is adopted. The time
within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of
Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 6th day of March, 2001.
George H. aters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney