Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006 CC RESO 2006-185 CDCNOT ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2006-185 A "RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DENYING A DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY REVIEW FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, 'PARK LOFTS' LOCATION: 1509, 1531, 1535 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD AND 49 EAST 16TH STREET APPLICANT: WILLMARK COMMUNITIES, INC. CASE FILE NO.: DSP-2006-1" This Resolution was not adopted at the City Council Meeting of August 22, 2006. DATE: August 30, 2006 h44Michael Rla, CMC City Clerk of the City of National City Nod /9alople RESOLUTION NO. 2006 — 185 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DENYING A DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY REVIEW FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT, 'PARK LOFTS' LOCATION: 1509, 1531, 1535 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD AND 49 EAST 16TH STREET APPLICANT: WILLMARK COMMUNITIES, INC. CASE FILE NO.: DSP-2006-1 WHEREAS, the applicant has filed an application for Downtown Specific Plan' Consistency Review; and WHEREAS, the adopted procedures for Consistency Review require the Community Development Commission Board to consider all development proposals at a public hearing; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission Board considered the application at a duly advertised public hearing held on August 22, 2006, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Community Development Commission Board considered the recommendation and findings of the staff report contained in Case File No. DSP-2006-1, which is incorporated herein by reference, along with the evidence and testimony at said hearing; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City determined on July 17, 2006, that the proposed street and alley vacation is not consistent with the General Plan; and WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Community Development Commission Board finds that the testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing support the finding that the project is not consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based on the finding hereinbefore stated, that the Community Development Commission Board denies said Downtown Specific Plan Consistency Review. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution shall be transmitted forthwith to the applicant. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the Community Development Commission meeting where the resolution is adopted. The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6.