HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 2008-143•
•
•
RESOLUTION NO.2008 —143
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CONFIRMING AND APPROVING THE DIAGRAM AND
THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT AND
PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT IN THE DOWNTOWN NATIONAL CITY
PROPERTY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
(MORGAN SQUARE COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT)
WHEREAS, the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Part 7
of Division 18 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 36600
(the "Law"), authorizes cities and counties to establish, for up to five years initially, property and
business improvement districts ("PBID") to promote the economic revitalization and physical
maintenance of business districts; and
WHEREAS, the Law authorizes cities to levy and collect assessments on real
property within such districts for the purpose of providing improvements and promoting activities
that specially benefit real property within such districts; and
WHEREAS, Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution and Section
53753 of the California Government Code impose certain procedural and substantive
requirements relating to the levy of new or increased assessments; and
WHEREAS, in March, 2004, a written petition was submitted by property owners
within Downtown National City requesting that the Community Development Commission of the
City of National City (CDC) initiate proceedings pursuant to the Law to establish the Downtown
National City Management District for a five (5) year period; and
WHEREAS, such petition was signed by property owners in the proposed district
who will pay more than fifty percent (50%) of the assessments proposed to be levied; and
WHEREAS, a Management District Plan entitled the Downtown National City
Management District Plan (the "Management District Plan") and a District Assessment
Engineer's Report were prepared and submitted to the City Clerk, containing all of the
information required by Section 36622 of the Law, including a description of the boundaries of
the district, the improvements and activities proposed for the district, and the cost of such
improvements and activities; and
WHEREAS, the CDC established, for five years, the Downtown National City
Management District (the "District") and levied and collected assessments against lots and
parcels of real property within the District, commencing with fiscal year 20004-05; and
WHEREAS, the CDC approved the Management District Plan, which is on file in
the office of the City Clerk and available for public review during normal business hours; and
WHEREAS, the boundaries of the proposed District are included in the
Management District Plan; and
WHEREAS, the proposed activities for the District include streetscape, sidewalk,
parkway and street furniture maintenance, repair and replacement including but not limited to
trees, sidewalk pavement, sidewalk bollards, street furniture, trash receptacles and street lights,
as well as periodic landscape maintenance and steam cleaning services which benefit
businesses and real property located in the District; and
•
•
•
Resolution No. 2008 — 143
July 15, 2008
Page 2
WHEREAS, the assessment proposed to be levied and collected for fiscal year
2008-09 is $240,688.64, which was the same assessment amount levied for fiscal year 2007-
2008.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of National
City declares as follows:
Section 1.
RECITALS
The above recitals are all true and correct
PROCEDURES
Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the
consideration of the levy of the annual assessment have been undertaken in accordance with
both the Act and Article XIII D in as much as the proposed assessments for the Fiscal Year
2008-09 are not proposed to be increased over the assessment previously authorized to be
levied.
DETERMINATION AND CONFIRMATION
Section 3. The final assessment for the proceedings, as contained in the Assessment
Engineer's Report and the diagram are herby approved and confirmed.
Based upon the Assessment Engineer's Report and the diagram, attached hereto as
Exhibits "A" and "B", respectively, and upon the testimony and other evidence presented at the
public hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following determinations regarding the
assessments proposed to be imposed:
A. The proportionate special benefit derived by each individual parcel assessed
has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the operations and
maintenance expenses.
B. The assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional
special benefit conferred on each parcel.
C. Only the special benefits have been assessed.
The assessments for the District contained in the assessment attached hereto as Exhibit
"C" for the next fiscal year are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels
in the District in the amounts as set forth in the assessment attached hereto as Exhibit "C".
ORDERING OF MAINTENANCE
Section 4. The public interest and convenience requires, and this legislative body does
hereby order the maintenance work to be made and performed as said maintenance work is set
forth in the Assessment Engineer's Report and as previously declared and set forth in the
Resolution of Intention.
•
•
•
Resolution No. 2008 — 143
July 15, 2008
Page 3
FILING WITH CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER
Section 5. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office
of the City Clerk, with certified copy to be filed in the Office of the City Engineer. Said diagram
and assessment and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection.
FILING WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR
Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified
copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later
than the August 10, 2008.
ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
Section 7. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall
enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of the land the amount
assessed there upon, as shown in the assessment.
COLLECTION AND PAYMENT
Section 8. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same
manner as the County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and
enforcement of the County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the
assessments.
FISCAL YEAR
Section 9. The assessments as above authorized and levied for these proceedings will
provide revenue and are related to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008 and ending June
30, 2009.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 20
ATTEST:
i1
Mi ael R. Dalla, " ity Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H.'Eiser, III
City Attorney
Ron Morrison, Mayo
EXHIBIT A
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
Downtown National City
Property Business Improvement District
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY - CALIFORNIA
DISTRICT
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER' S
REPORT
Prepared by
Edward V. Henning,
California Registered Professional Engineer # 26549
Edward Henning & Associates
Phelan California
June 1, 2004
1333o Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • ((ax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink_net
ATTACHMENT NO: 3
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
DISTRICT ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT
To Whom It May Concern:
I hereby certify to the best of my professional knowledge and experience that each of the identified benefiting
properties located within the proposed Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District will receive
a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on the public at large and that the amount of the proposed
assessment is proportional to, and no greater than the benefits conferred on each respective property.
eertarepare • by Edward V. Henning, California Registered Professional Engineer # 26549
t
RPE 1126549
June 1, 2004
Date
(NOT VALID WITHOUT EMBOSSED CERTIFICATION SEAL AND SIGNATURE HERE)
Introduction
This report shall serve as the "detailed engineer's report" required by Section 4(b) of Article )(MD of the California
Constitution (Proposition 218) to support the benefit property assessments proposed to be levied within the
Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District (Downtown National City PBID) in the City of
National City, California being established for a five year period. The discussion and analysis contained within
constitutes the required "nexus" of rationale between assessment amounts levied and special benefits derived by
properties within the Downtown National City PBID.
NOTE 1: The terminology "identified benefiting parcel" or "property' is used throughout this report pursuant to SB
919 - "Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act" which clarified portions of Prop 218. It provides the Engineer
and District Consultant with the ability to actually identify individual parcels which will benefit directly either in
whole or in part from the proposed District funded programs and improvements and does not imply that all parcels
receive assessable benefits
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink_net
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
Background
The Downtown National City PBID is a property -based benefit assPssment type district being established pursuant to
Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Highways Code, also known as the Property and Business
Improvement District Law of 1994 (the "Act"). Due to the benefit assessment nature of assessments levied within a
PBID, district program costs are to be distributed amongst all identified benefiting properties based on the
proportional amount of program benefit each property is expected to derive from the assessments collected. Within
the Act, frequent references are made to the concept of relative "benefit" received from PBID programs and activities
versus amount of assessment paid. Only those properties expected to derive special benefits from PBID funded
programs and activities may be assessed and only in an amount proportional to the relative benefits expected to be
received
The method used to determine benefits derived by each identified property within a PBID begins with the selection
of a suitable and tangible basic benefit -unit For property related services, such as those proposed in the Downtown
National City PBID, the benefit unit may be mea' nred in linear feet of street frontage or parcel size in square feet or
building size in square feet or number of building floors or proximity to major corridors in average linear feet, or any
combination of these factors. Quantity takeoffs for each parcel are then measured or otherwise ascertained. From
these figures, the amount of benefit units to be assigned to each property can be calculated. Special circumstances
such as unique geography, land uses, development constraints etc. are carefully reviewed relative to specific
programs and improvements to be funded by the PBID in order to determine any levels of diminished benefit which
may apply on a parcel by parcel or categorical basis.
Based on the factors described above such as geography and nature of programs and activities proposed, an
assessment formula is developed which is derived from a singular or composite basic benefit unit factor or factors_
Within the assessment formula, different factors may be assigned different "weights" or percentage of values.
Next, all program and activity costs, including incidentalcosts, district administration, ancillary programs, and
volunteer and comped resource and material credits are estimated It is noted, as stipulated in Proposition 218, and
now required of all property based assessment districts, indirect and general benefits may not be incorporated into
the assessment formula and levied on the district properties; only direct or "special" benefits and costs may be
considered. Indirect or general benefit costs must be calculated and factored out of the assessment cost basis to
produce a "net" cost .figure. In addition, Proposition 218 no longer exempts government owned property from paying
benefit assessments and these properties must be factored into the assessment roll if special benefit is determined to
be conferred upon suclr properties.
2
13330 Butternere Rd • Phelan CA 9237r • (76o) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
•
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
From this, the valve of a basic benefit unit or "basic net unit cost" can be computed by dividing the total amount of
estimated net program costs by the total number of benefit units. The amount of assessment for each parcel can be
computed at this time by multiplying the Net Unit Cost times the number of Basic Benefit Units per parcel. This is
known as "spreading the assessment" or the "assessment spread" in that all costs are allocated proportionally or
"spread" amongst all properties within the PBID.
The method and basis of spreading program costs varies from one PBID to another based on local geographic
conditions, types of programs and activities proposed, and size and development complexity of the district_ PBIDs
may require secondary benefit zones to be identified to allow for a tiered assessment formula for variable or
"stepped -down" benefits derived.
Supplemental Proposition 218 Procedures and Requirements
Proposition 218, approved by the voters of California in November of 1996, adds a supplemental array of procedures
and requirements to be carried out prior to levying a property -based assessment hie the Downtown National City
PBID. These requirements are in addition to requirements imposed by State and local assessment enabling laws.
These requirements were "chaptered" into law as Article MID of the California Constitution and then further
clarified by the Proposition 218 Omnibus Legislation in 1997 chaptered in section 53750 et seq of the California
Government Code.
Since Prop 218 provisions will affect all subsequent calculations to be made in laying out the final property
assessment roll for the Downtown National City PBID, Prop 218 requirements will be taken into account fast.. The
key provisions of Prop 218 along with a description of how the Downtown National City PBID complies with each of
these provisions is delineated below.
(Note: All section references below pertain to Article XIII of the California Constitution):
Finding 1. From Section 4(a): "Identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and
upon which an assessment will be imposed"
There are 153 "identified" individual parcels within the Downtown National City PBID which v. ill all derive some
level of spet.ial benefit from the proposed District programs and activities. These parcels are shown on the
Boundary Map within the Management District Plan and are listed as an attachment to the Plan - identified by
assessor parcel number and site address. Two benefit zones have been identified within the District whichgenerally
includes all properties along and surrounding the National City Boulevard corridor from 2nd to 12th and the 8th
Street corridor from the freeway to A Avenue.
3
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (76o) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
•
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
Finding 2. From Section 4(a): "Separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on parcel(s).
Only special benefits are assessable. "
As stipulated by Prop 218, assessment district programs and activities confer a combination of general and special
benefits to district properties, but the only program benefits which can be funded through assessments are those
attributed to special property related benefits. Thus, a portion of the program costs must be considered attributable
to general benefits and assigned a value. Conventional assessment engineering experience has found that general
benefits within a given district typically average 10% of the total adjusted costs with a 5% deviation. (Total
adjusted costs include actual proposed PBID program costs plus any additional supplemental or matching program
costs as well as applied credits from sources such as start up grants, Board/Committee member service credits and
specialized assessment reductions/adjustments.) There are three common methods for determining general and
special benefit ratios within assessment districts:
(1) The parcel by parcel allocation method
(2) The program/activity line item allocation method, and
(3) The composite district overlay determinant method.
The vast majority of PB1Ds in California have used. Method #3, the composite district overlay determinant method
which will be used for the Downtown National City PBID. Using empirical data from other PBIDs, a focused range
for general benefits from 5-15% is used. Based on a composite of district criteria such as the shape of the
Downtown National City PBID, the existence of two benefit zones, a three-four element assessment formula, the
proximity all of district properties to the applicable program benefit zones, and the nature of the proposed programs
and activities, a specific "overlay" vahte of 5% is assigned to the general benefit portion of the total adjusted costs.
This leaves a value of 95% assigned to special benefit related costs. Since the total program cost is estimated at
$265,572.01 (see Table 1 later in this Report), the maximum special benefit portion which can be recouped through
property assessments, is $252,293.41. Remaining costs which are attributed to general benefits, will need to be
derived from other sources. (e.g. public/private matching grants, startup grants, startup volunteer credits or ongoing
board member volunteer credits).
4
13330 Butternere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
Finding 3. From Section 4(a): "(Determine) the proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in
relationship to the entirety of the. ---.cost of public improvement(s) or the maintenance and operation
expenses.........»or the cost of the property related service being provided.
The proportionate special benefit cost for each parcel is listed in an attaclunent to the Management District Plan.
The individual percentages (i.e. proportionate relationship to the total special benefit related program and activity
. costs) were computed by dividing the individual parcel assessment by the total program costs.
Finding 4. From Section 4(a): "No assessment....... shall exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special
benefit conferred on parcel(;)."
Not only are the proposed program costs reasonable due to the benefit of group purchasing and contracting which
would be possible through the Downtown National City PBID, they are also considerably less than other options
considered by groups bke the Downtown National City PBID Formation Committee.
Finding 5. Frinn Section 4(a): "Parcels. --.that are owned or used by any (public) agency shall not be exempt
from assessment."
Parcels within the District that are owned by public agencies (i.e. City of National City, the Community
Development Commission, Southwestern College etc) will also be assessed and at rates equivalent to private sector
owned parcels. The "fair market value" of such public properties is identical to surrounding privately owned
parcels and any increased values and benefits derived from PBID programs and services would be similar for either
public or privately owned parcels, with er without improvements. Just as the costs and effects of blight are shared
by both public and private properties, so are the rewards of clean and safe as well as district promotions and
marketing programs. Since there is no compelling finding or evidence that such properties would receive less direct
benefit from the proposed PBID programs and services than surrounding private parcels, the same assessment rates
would be levied
Finding 6.. From Section 4(b): "All assessments must be supported by a detailed engineer's report prepared by
a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California".
This report shall serve as the "detailed engineer's report" to support the benefit property assessments proposed to
be levied within the Downtown National City PBID.
5
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (76o) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
•
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
Firtdinz 7. From Section 4(c): "The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel shall be calculated
(along with) the total amount thereof chargeable to the entire district, the duration of such payments, the
reason for such a •sessment and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated."
The individual and total parcel assessments attributable to special property benefits are shown on an attachment to
the Management District Plan. The district and resultant assessment payments will continue for five years and may
be renewed again at that time. The reasons (purposes) for the proposed assessments are outlined in the Management
District Plan. The calculation basis of the proposed assessment for the PBID is attributed in part to The specific
amount of property size, building size and street frontage.
Special Benefit and Assessment Analysis
Step 1. Select "Basic Benefit Unit(s)"
PBID assessment formulas typically are based on either property street frontage or parcel and building size or
location, all which can affect the amount of benefit conferred on a particular parcel and the proportionate assessment
to be paid. The formula may base assessments on a single factor or a combination of factors.
Based on the nature of the program activities to be funded by the Downtown National City PBID, which relate to the
proportionate amount of real estate (i.e. land) held in ownership, development intensity (i.e. building area) and
property street frontage as well as land use, it has been determined that the assessments for the PBID will be based
proportionately on a combination of parcel size, building size, land use and street frontage. In addition a flat rate will
be applied to single family residential (SFR) and residential condo units located on non -residentially zoned land.
The "Basic Benefit Unit" will be expressed as a function of land square footage (Basic Benefit "A" Units), building
area (Basic Benefit `B" Units - further refined by land use) and linear feet of property frontage (Basic Benefit "C"
Units). Based on the shape of the Downtown National City PBID, as well as the nature of the District program
elements, it is determined that two benefit zones exist in which identified properties will gain a direct, albeit,
proportionate degree of benefit based on the respective amount of parcel size, building size, land use and street
frontage.
Step 2. Quantify Total Basic Benefit Units
Taking into account all identified benefiting properties, there are 1,465,301 square feet of assessable parcel land area
within the District, 448,344 square feet of assessable building area and 21,744 linear feet of property street frontage.
In addition, there are 12 assessable single family/condo units. Since the selected Basic Benefit Unit is based on a
6
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
combination of parcel area, building area and street frontage, there are, in turn, corresponding amounts of Basic
Benefit Units in the PBID as shown in Step 7 herein. The target weighted revenues from each formula component
were 50% for land area, 30% for building area and 20% for street frontage. The final adjusted weights are 49% for
land, 33% for building area, 17% for street frontage and 1% for SFR and condo flat rates. Further, the targeted
weighted revenues for each Benefit Zone were 60% for Zone 1 and 40% for Zone 2. The final adjusted weights are
61% for Zone 1 and 39% for Zone 2.
Step 3, Calculate Benefit Units for Each Property.
The number of Benefit Units for each identified benefiting parcel within the Downtown National City PBID was
computed from data extracted from City of National City, San Diego County and third party real estate data services
property and land use records. These data sources delineate current land uses, property areas and dimensions of
record for each tax parcel and are listed as an attachment to the Management District Plan. While it is understood
that this data does not represent legal field survey measurements or detailed title search of recorded land subdivision
maps or building records, it does provide an acceptable -basis for the purpose of calculating property based
assessments. All respective property data being used for assessment computations has been provided to each property
owner in the PBID for their review. All known or reported discrepancies or errors have been corrected.
Step 4. Determine Assessment Formula
For a District with a single Basic Benefit Unit with one Benefit Zone, the assessment formula would be the same for
each identified benefiting property as follows:
Number of Basic Benefit Units x Basic Unit Cost = PBID Assessment
The Downtown National City PBID assessment is to be based on three Basic Benefit Unit factors; land square
footage (Basic Benefit "A" Units), building area (Basic Benefit 'B" Units) and linear feet of property frontage (Basic
Benefit "C" Units). It has been determined that the assessment should be based partially on parcel size, building size
and street frontage as follows:
Zone 1:
Assessment = [(No. of Benefit "A-1"Units x Basic "A-l" Unit Cost)] +
[(No. of Benefit `B-I" Units x Basic "B-1" Unit. Cost)] +
[(No. of Benefit "C-1" Units x Basic "C-1" Unit Cost)]
Zone 2:
Assessment =
[(No. of Benefit "A-2—Units x Basic "A-2" Unit Cost)] +
[(No. of Benefit "B-2" Units x Basic `B-2" Unit Cost)] +
[(No. of Benefit "C-2" Units x Basic "C-2" Unit Cost)]
7
13330 Butternere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
Note A: Benefit "B" Unit Costs vary based on land use as shown in Table 3 later in this report.
Note B:. Assessments for single family residential and residential condos are based on a flat fee per unit as
shown in Table 3.
Step 5._ Estimate Total Program and Activity Costs
Total estimated proposed program and activity costs are shown below in Table 1_ These costs include expenses for
general as well as special benefits and related programs/activities..
TABLE 1
Estimated Total Year 1 Program & Activity Costs (Special+General Benefits)
Program/Activity
Year 1
0/0
Public Rights of Way & Sidewalk Operations
$173,000.00
65.14%
District Identity/Streetsca_pe Improvements
$14,000.00
5.27%
Administration/Corporate Operations
S41,000.00
1 5.44%
Contingency/Reserve
$12,722.01.
4.79%
Misc Costs (Credits)
$24,850.00
9..36%
Total
$265,572.01
100.00%
Step 6. Separate General Benefits from Special Benefits and Related Costs (Prop 218)
Total program and activity costs are estimated at $265,572.01 (see Table 1 above). General benefits are factored at
5% of total (see Finding 2 on page 4 of this report) with sya.ial benefits set at 95%. Prop 218,limits the levy of
property assessments to costs attributed to special benefits only. The 5% general benefit cost is computed to be
$ 13,278.60 with a resultant 95% special benefit limit computed at $252,293.41. This is the maximum amount of
revenue that can be derived from property assessments from the subject PBID. The total anwtint of revenue
proposed to be derived from PBID assessments is $240,722.01 for Year I, which is less than the special benefit limit
of $252,293.41. Therefore, no Prop 218 adjustments need to be made to the proposed assessment formula. All
program costs associated 'with general benefits will be derived -from -sources or -credits other than PB1D assessments
as shown below in Table 2.
8
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
TABLE 2
Total Adjusted Year 1 Revenue (For Special + General Benefit Programs/Activities)
Fundi g Source
Subtotal Revenue
oh
PBID Assessments
3240,722.01
90.64%.
PBID Formation Pro -rated Credit/Year (135,000 base)
$7,000.00
2.64%
PBip Formation Pro -Rated Volunteer Credit/Year (S0% base)
33,500.00
1.32%
Annual Board/Volunteer Credit (35% base Admin)
$14,350.00
5.40%
TOTAL ADJUSTED REVENUE
$265,572.01
100.00%
Step 7. Calculate `Basic Unit Cost" (Special Benefits Only)
With a Year 1 budget of $240,720_01 (special benefit only), the Basic Unit Costs ("A", "B" and "C") from the
Management Plan are:
TABLE 3
Basic Unit
Land Use Description
Benefit Zone 1
Benefit Zone 2
"A" Cost
All except SFR and condos •
S0.0841/sf
$0.0757/sf
`B-a"'Cost
Retail, hotels, motels, visitor
$0.1886/sf
$0.1697/sf
"B-b" Cost
Office, commercialLpkg stnic.
$0.1696/sf
$0.1697/sf
"B-c" Cost
Industrial, manufacturing
$0.1696/sf
$0.16971sf
"B-d" Cost
Institutional, government etc
$0.1577/sf
$0.1578/sf
`B-e" Cost
Residential 20+ units
$0.1485/sf
$0.1485/sf
`13 r Cost
Residential 9-19 units
$0.1485/sf
$0.1485/sf
_ "B-g" Cost
Residential 2-8 units
$0.1485/sf
$0.1485/sf
"B-h" Cost
Single family residential
$240 flat rate
$240 flat rate
"B-i" Cost
Residential Condo
$240 flat rate
$240 flat rate
"C' Cost
All except SFR and condos
$1.8264/LF
$1.8264/LF
Since the PBID is planned for a five year term, maximum acs'trnents for future years (Years 2 through 5) must be
set at the inception of the PBID. A maximum annual flat rate increase of 5% may be imposed each year, subject to
approval by the PBID Board_
9
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
Step 8. Spread the Assessments
The resultant assessment spread calculations for each parcel within the PBID are shown in an attachment to the
District Management Plan and were determined by applying the District assessment formula to each identified
benefiting property. This list of all identified benefiting parcels in the PB1D delineates each parcel and benefit units
for property street frontage and parcel area.
10
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (76o) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • nired2@earthlink.net
•
•
Edward Henning & Associates
URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING
EDWARD HENNING & ASSOCIATES
Edward Henning and Associates is a multi -disciplined consulting firm offering a diverse range of community development
and funding services focusing on downtown business districts and the unique problems and opportunities associated with
center city areas.
Types of services provided
• Business Improvement District (BID & PBID) Formations, Modifications, Expansions, Updates
• Pmp 218 Assessment Engineering Analyses and Reports (Licensed Engineer)
- Downtown Revitalization Plans/Redevelopment Planning and Implementation
• Establish/Administer/Field Supervision for Rehabilitation Programs and Projects
• Architectural Design Guidelines/ Sign Ordinances
Partial list of agencies and clients represented
• Town of Apple Valley
• City of Berkeley
• City of Buena Park
• City of Culver City
• City of Huntington Park
• City of Huntington Beach
• City of Los Angeles
- Gateway to LAX
- Historic Downtown Core
- Hollywood District
- Melrose/Fairfax
— Larchmont
- Los Feliz
- San Fernando Valley (6 areas)
- San Vicente
- Wilshire Center
- City of Monterey Park
• City of Napa
• City of Newport Beach
• City of Ontario (Downtown)
• City of Oxnard
• City of Pasadena
• PIacer County (Tahoe City)
• City of San Francisco (Union Square)
• City of Vacaville
• City of Whittier
• City of Yucaipa
PBID Formation (Village).
BID Formation (Downtown)
BID Formation Analysis (Auto Row & Entertainment Corridor)
BID Formation (Downtown)
BID Formation (Pacific Blvd.)
BID Formation (Auto Row District)
PBID Formation & Renewal (Prop 218 Compliance)
PBID Formation (Prop.218 Compliance)
PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance)
PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance)
PBID Formation & Renewal
BID Formation
PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance)
Private Sector PBID Formation
Hybrid BID/PBID Formation
BID Modification (Downtown)
PBID Formation (Downtown)
BID Advising
BID Modification
PBID Formation (Downtown)
PBID Formation (Playhouse District)
Citywide Tourist Improvement District (ITT)
PBID Formation (Downtown)
PBID Formation (Prop 2I8 Compliance)
BID Formation (Downtown)
Citywide Tourist Improvement District Evaluation (TID)
BID Modification (Uptown)
PBID Formation & Renewal(Uptown)
I1
13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net
140,40
c.�
A Ava,
i r x I i
1
NAflONAt. CITY "' .' ,j-.l.._i $ ! '� a tt
NAT;OVj„ C' y .-_..--4- ..1..... 4 . to p
GIsj/ r r !' ' y NatiayalCit ! -� f ! 1 1 ; r 7:Rt..._7_ Y Blvd
- t.. .I� li'
7 �
j-..
T_. Rooswolt
b Ava
•
DOWNTOWN NATIONAL CITY PROPERTY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED
2008
ANNUAL
ANNUAL
ANNUAL
ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT
APN
ANNUAL
ASSESSMENT
APN .
ASSESSMENT APN
AJJtbamGVI Aril
• -'•' •-• ..
54,830.57
555-030-01-00
555-030-02-00
555.030.03.00
555-030-04-00
555-030-05.00
555-030-06-00
555-030-07-00
555-030.08.00
555-030-09-00
555-030-10-00
555-030-11-00
555-030-12-00
555-030-13-00
555-030-14-00
555-030-17-00
555-030-20-00
555-030-21-00
555-030-22-00
555-041-01-00
555-041-02-00
555-041-03-00
555-041-04-00
555-041-05.00
555-041-06-00
555-041-07.00
555-041-08-00
555-041-09-00
555-041-10-00
$240.00
$427.32
$0.00
$0.00
$240.00
50.00
$240.00
$1,358.46
5278,41
$339.52
$270.50
3344.51
$282.92
$500,53
$1,089.50
$4,997.45
$3,644.29
66,609.58
6878.28
6472.48
63,616.36
$1,063.44
$570.74
6571 49'_
$69446
$511.82
$511.82
$1,206.28
555-042-18-00
555-052-04-00
555.052-05-00
555-052-06-00
555-052.14-00
555-052-15-00
555-053-17-00
555-054-12-00
555-081.09.00
555-081-10-00
555-081-14-00
555-081-15-00
555.081-16-00
555-081-17-00
555-082-01-00
555-082-02-00
555-082-03-00
555-082-04-00
555-082-05-00
555-082-06-00
555-082-10-00
555-082-11-00
$7,001.77
$694,46
$649.75
$471.60
$2,453.40
52,361.54
$22,785.90
56,377,83
$510,24
$267.23
$396.50
$216.88
$695.37
$1,992,94
$1,855.29
$244.19
$527.88
$399.68
$1,137.98
$960.23
$1,533.33
$4097.40
555-085-06-00
555-085-07-00
555-113-04-00
555-113-05-00
555.113-08-00
555.113-11.00
555-113-12-00
555-113-13-00
555-114-01-00
555.114-02-00
555-114-03-00
555-114-04-00
555-114-05-00
555-114-06-00
555-114-07-00
555-114-11-00
555-114-12-00
555-114-13-00
556-101-01-00
556-101-02-00
556-101-15-00
556-101-16-00
556.104-01-00
556.104-02-00
556.104-18-00
556-210-25-00
556-210-26-00
556-210.27-00
_ •
$187.37
$4,258.90
$808.87
$792.75
$1,269.33
52,084.78
$1,569.72
$1,133.05
$240.00
6240.00
$215.59
$220.14
$452.48
$652.46
$1,151.14
$330.42
$1,594,28
51,569.62
$1,614.58
$1,815.33
$5,492.84
$2,276.33
$2,485.63
5240.00.
61,820.45
51,662.72
$1,510.43
$1,077.40
556-212-04.00
556-212-05-00
556-212-06-00
556-212-07-00
556.331.03-00
556-331.04-00
556-331-05-00
556-331-14-00
556331-15-00
556-331-20-00
556-331-21-00
556-331-22-00
556-331-23-00
556-331-24-00
556.331-25-00
556-332-20-00
556-332-21-00
556-332-22-00
556-332-23-00
556-332-24-00
556-333-15-00
556-333-17-00
556-333-18-00
556.334.19-00
556.334-20.00
556-334-21-00
556-334-22-00
5276,94
$419.14
$563.61
$754.77
556-471-23-00
556-471-24.00
556-472-23-00
556.472 24 00
$3,673.51
62,019.79
5527 74
$249.09
5505.91
$1,181.45
$2,439.68
$926.31
$748.13
$2,720.06
$1,255.39
$566.21
$715.80
$3,133.35
$1,764.62
$535.59
$375.86
$253.70
51,409,83
• $2,626.38
$4,907.21
$522.19
52,101.81
$282.35
$410.30
$452.14
, h-'-.';v _ +s: c2a:,�..i
-- ` -'�.
556-472.2-7.00
556-473-15-00
556-473-16-00
556-473-17-00
556-474-01-00
556.474-02-00
556-474-21-00
556-493-01-00
556-493-04-00
556-493-05-00
556-553-01-00
556-553-02-00
556-553-03-00
556-553-04-00
556-553-05-00
556-553-14-00
556-553.15-00
556-554-16.00
556 554.17-00
556-554-18-00
556-554-19-00
556-554-20-00
556-554-21-00
$265.95
$1,526.52
$792.75
$962.08
$1,610.56
$739.54
$2,527.99
$1,290.96
$934.44
$240.00
5694,46'.
$357.75
$409.23
$616.95
$1,592.79
$1,324.56
$284.84
54,415.42
$6,245.33
$1,195.18
$569.85
$1,205.03
$1,568.79
0•54rea '
r •• t !
��
P I
�� a fir > �-
'•n
s' x�nm
kt
i•7r:.
a••.:
: - - ` o�
555-085-01-00
555-085-02-00
$622.48
$240.00
t. ��a l ..
yx•=
v f'
°'
555-042-10-00
$1,080.70
555-085-03.00
$240.00
556-212-01-00
$240.00
at "5(;.-
556.471.16.00
555-042-15-00
$3,104.82
555-085-04-00
$464.11
556-212-02-00
5240,00
$1,585.34
555.042-17-00
$3,458.95
555-085-05-00
I $2,797.35
.556.212-03-00
$496.74
556-471-17-00
$2,691.26
338,604.63
I $77,677.89
$39,743.35
$39,183.49
$45,479.28
$0.00
$15,682.56
$0.00
$2,809.07
53,056.70
$38,604.63
$61,995.33
539,743.35
$36,374.42
$42,422.58
f rstp, 9sg-i f
xEt i f 74',7
SISIHX
6240.688,64 Total Assessments
621.548.33 Total Public Parcels
6219.140.31 Total Assessments less Public F
Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California, on July 15,
2008 by the following vote, to -wit:
Ayes: Councilmembers Morrison, Natividad, Parra, Ungab, Zarate.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
Abstain: None.
AUTHENTICATED BY: RON MORRISON
Mayor of the City of National City, California
City CI k of the City of N ional City, California
By:
Deputy
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO. 2008-143 of the City of National City, California, passed and
adopted by the Council of said City on July 15, 2008.
City Clerk of the City of National City, California
By:
Deputy