HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 9662RESOLUTION NO.
9662
RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT PROJECT SHOULD PROCEED
Cr, ,l JIo (�,?
> a
20th, 22nd, 24th Streets,
Assessment District No. 153)
tEREAS, the City Engineer has heretofore filed his
report pursuant to the provisions of the Special Assessment In-
vestigation, Limitation and Mayority Protest Act of 1931 for
the improvements proposed on "I", "J", "L", 20TH, 22ND, 24TH
STREETS, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 153; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authorization of the City
Council of the City of National City hearings on said report
have been conducted by the City Manager and the City Engineer
and a report on said hearings has been filed with the City
Council and is now on file with the Clerk of the City of
National City pursuant to the provisions of Section 2858 of
the Streets and Highways Code of California; and
WHEREAS, said City Engineer and City Manager in said
report have recommended certain modifications in the proposed
improvements and the City Engineer has filed with the City
Clerk modified plans incorporating said modifications;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of National City as follows:
The said City Council of National City hereby finds
and determines that the proposed project as modified in con-
formance with the report and recommendation of the City En-
gineer and the City Manager, is feasible and that the lands
to be assessed will be able to carry the burden of such pro-
posed assessment and that the limitations on the amounts of
assessment provided for in Part 5 of Division 4 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California may and shall be
disregarded both with respect to the limitations on the district
as a whole and as to the limitation on individual specific
assessments. _
The City Council of the City of National City fur-
ther finds and determines that the public interest, convenience
and necessity require the acquisition or improvement substan-
tially as set forth in the above -described report as modified
and that the project is feasible and that the same should pro-
ceed under the law stated in the report as the statute under
which the proceeding is to be conducted and that all protests
against said proposed improvement, if any, are hereby over-
ruled.
1968.
ATTEST:
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 17th day of September
CITY ERK