Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 4303RESOLUTION NO. 4303 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the Council does hereby approve the Master Plan of Airports for San Diego County as submitted by the Airport Committee of San Diego County. ry PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of National City, California, this 21st day of January , by the following vote, to -wit: AYES: Councilmen Adama_,.__G:ordfngl.y_i__). ewberry?__Thatzha.ry _-g •l s NAYS: Councilmen None ABSENT• None ATTEST • I hereby approve the foregoing City Clerk. Resolution tligticKA Mayor of the City oblational City, Cali this_21st__ day of January 1947 Mayor of the City of National City, California. I herebycertifythat the above and foregoing Resolution g g is a full and true copy of No Ordinance of the { Resolutions } of the City of National City, California, as adopted by the City Council of said Ordinances City, and approved by the Mayor of said City, on the day of 19 City Clerk of the City of National City, California. Deputy . #, I/3o3 (Enclosure A) Administrator for Airports, Civil Aeronautics Administration, Memo F-586, dated July 17, 1945, quoted herewith in full: FOn July 132 1945, the Committee on. Airport Spacing reviewed the tentative airport. spacing standards released by the Airport Service on. December 7, 1944, in field memorandum F-577, and the comments and recommendations thereon which have been received from the regional offices of the CAA . and various groups in the aviation Industry.. "As a result of this review the Comittee has recommended final airport spacing standards to be used in airport planning which are as foollows: '',(a) The following standards are based upon present know- ledge of safety requirements necessary in the light of future anticipated air traffic and the probable methods of controlling such traffic, including possible future developments in air navigation aids. IT IS APPRECIATED THAT DEVIATIONS FROM THESE STANDARDS WILL NOT ONLY BE NECESSARY BUT WILL BE DESIRABLE AND ENTIRELY FEASIBLE WHERE AIR TRAFFIC FLOW PATTERNS FOR LOCAL AREAS ARE OR CAN BE ESTABLISHED OR TRAFFIC IS CONTROLLED. 7'(b) AIRPORTS AT WHICH INSTRUMENT OPERATIONS ARE TO BE' CONDUCTED SIMULTANEOUSLY WILL REQUIRE SUFFICIENT SEPARATION FROM CENTER TO CENTER TO PREVENT CONFLICT AND OVERLAPPING IN THE HOLDING AND APPROACH PATTERNS DURING SIMULTANEOUS INSTRU- MENT APPROACHES. ce (e) (1) FOR STRICTLY CONTACT OPERATIONS AIRPORTS SHOULD BE LOCATED FAR ENOUGH APART SO THAT THEIR RESPECTIVE CONTACT TRAFFIC PATTERNS WILL NOT CONFLICT. As a general guide the sizes of the -Various contact traffic patterns for the different classes of airports may be considered as follows: Class 1 - 1 Class 2 . 2 Class 3 - 3 Class 4 - 4 (and above) . mile mile mile mile radius radius radius radius le(2) When the location of a contact airport with respect to an instrument airport is based upon minimum distances permissible for contact operations as listed above, it is under- stood that the operations at the contact airport in the interest of safety may be . limited during such times that instrument opera- tions are being conducted at the instrument airport. Such limitations should be worked out by Federal,: State, and local aviation officials when establishing the air traffic pattern for the local area. a ip (Enclosure A . Continued) "(d) IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO CONSIDER EXISTING AIRWAY RADIO RANGE FACILITIES IN THE PLANNING OF AIRPORTS IN THE URBAN AREAS, in view of the prospective changes in the character of air navigation radio aids and the impermanence of the location of the existing airway radio facilities, .However, in selecting sites for new airports consideration must be given to existing and proposed instrument ' landing systems." SF_ (Enclosure B) Assistant Administrator for Airports, Civil Aeronautics Adminise tration, Memo F-587, dated July 5, 1945, quoted herewith in part: "(2) In order to insure orderly development of airports in metropolitan areas, to receive the benefits of coordinated pub- lic planning, and to perpetuate the properly located airports, sites falling within metropolitan areas as defined by each Region should receive the approval of the Airports Branch only when in accordance with an approved urban airport plan, or in the event no such plan has been adopted, only after the appro- priate local planning agency or subdivision of the government has been given the opportunity to express its views. "(3) In order to similarly insure orderly development of airports in all other areas not defined as metropolitan by the respective regions, sites falling outside them should receive the approval of the Airports Branch when in accordance with any approved community or area plan if such plan is known to exist, and if no plan exists, local planning agencies or ap- propriate subdivisions of government should be apprised of any approval. "This procedure will ascertain t•=t responsible localpublic authority will have cognizance of the contemplated use of land for airport purposes and thereby minimize the likelihood of conflict." "Metropolitan areas as defined by the Sixth Region are: ARIZONA . . CALIFORNIA; . . , . ® . . . 9 . . 9 9 . . 9 . San Diego - San Diego County, lying west of 116© 30'. "Personal Use Exception No provisions cited herein shall apply to restricted landing areas designed for personal use. We shall hold that every property owner or lease -holder has the right to use property under his jurisdiction for personal flight operation so long as it is expressly stated in writi as not held fora —or to R7 1741Zforth as a public land n *, area, =strict Airport Engineers may approve such a site when provided with the requisite statement of intent, provided it complies with the spacing limits set, forth in Memo i`-for any subsequent modi- fication thereof; if it does not, the case shall be referred to the Superintendent of Airports. "Procedure (a) Applicants desiring approval of sites as such with- out regard to designation will be advised of this policy, but will also be informed of IATCB and designation require. ments which will be handled through the Flight Operations Branch so long as these emergency requirements exist. They should be informed that the.Airports Branch approval is not mandatory except as with respect to the National Airport Plan and any possible benefits which may be derived therefrom. Enclosure B - Cont nand) (b) In compliance with the procedure established by the Superintendent of Airports within the spacing limitations of Memo F-577 and any subsequent revisions thereof, and subject to the terms of provision (2) and (3) of Memo F-587, District Airport Engineers may ,pprove all Class 1 and 2 airport sites, whether expandable or not, either within or outside metropo- litan areas as defined hereinbefore, and similarly, may also approve all Class 3.and larger airport sites outside the de- fined metropolitan areas. Although Memo F-577 generally covers the traffic problem,. in granting new site approvals it shall be the responsibility of District Airport Engineers to assure them- selves that no new site is in conflict with the authorized traffic patterns at existing airports, and if a conflict is apparent,'to ascertain that an acceptable solution thereto may be attained. (c) District Airport Engineers may provide only tentative approval of all Class 3 and larger airport sites within the defined metropolitan areas pending local adoption and our ap- proval of an airport plan for the urban area involved, but if no such plan is in preparation, shall refer the individual cases- to the Superintendent of Airports with recommendations. (d) All locally adopted metropolitan area or county -wide airport plans submitted to us will be approved by the Regional Administrator upon recommendation by the Superintendent of Air- ports. Such approval shall govern only the location of the in- dividual sites and the class airport proposed therefor and 'shall not be construed to encompass the details of design and layout. (e) All new airport sites which cannot be approved by Dis- trict Airport Engineers by virtue of limitations placed upon them, or because of their solicitation of Regional Office ap- proval, shall be approved by the Superintendent of Airports after appropriate coordination. "General (a) New airport sites are defined as those at which no recorded or noteworthy operation has heretofore been conducted.. Sites once in recorded use, but which have been formally de- clared abandoned (not "closed for duration") shall be regarded as new sites, Airports Branch Facility Records Section files shall govern in the event of controversy over reactivation of older sites alleged to be new. (b) Provision (2) of Memo F-587 provides that, in the absence of an approved urban plan, within the defined metro- politan areas approval of a new site shall be given only after local government has been given an opportunity to express its, views. The solicitation of these views as prescribed is man- datory, If it is found that we differ with local government, the applicant should be advised that local government generally has the legal authority to prevent or restrict new airport de- velopment, and our approval does not take precedence over local zoning and land use regulation. (c) Provision (3) of Memo F-587 provides that, in all other areas where no plan exists, local government shall be apprised of any approval, The giving of this notice is mandatory," C-9.3-I ee,o, 4/3613 0A-kf‘}