Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC RESO 2011-118RESOLUTION NO. 2011 — 118 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT, ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PREPARED TO ASSESS AND MITIGATE THE PROJECT IMPACTS OF ADOPTION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE CONSISTING OF A GENERAL PLAN UPDATE, A LAND USE CODE UPDATE, A CLIMATE ACTION PLAN, A DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, AND FIVE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS (STREET CONVERSIONS/COMMUNITY CORRIDORS, SENIOR VILLAGE EXPANSION, LAS PALMAS PARK AND FACILITIES VISION CONCEPT PLAN, KIMBALL PARK MASTER PLAN, AND EL TOYON PARK MASTER PLAN) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR"), Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP"), and Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations ("SOC") attached hereto as Exhibit "A-1" and incorporated herein as though fully set forth, prepared to assess and mitigate the project impacts of adoption of the Comprehensive Land Use Update at a duly advertised public hearing held on May 16, 2011, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Land Use Update consists of an update of the General Plan, an update of the Land Use Code, a Climate Action Plan, an amendment of the Downtown Specific Plan, and Five Development Proposals, namely, Street Conversions/ Community Corridors, Senior Village Expansion, Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, Kimball Park Master Plan, and El Toyon Park Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the General Plan is the City's principal policy document to guide growth, development, and conservation, and is the foundation for all planning decisions; and WHEREAS, the Land Use Code implements the broad policies of the General Plan by specifying the uses permitted on each parcel of land, the intensity of development, and standards for development; and WHEREAS, the Climate Action Plan establishes a strategy to reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change; and WHEREAS, the Downtown Specific Plan regulates the use and development of land within the downtown area of the City; and WHEREAS, the Five Development Proposals are consistent with and would implement the policies of the General Plan Update; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. 2011-17 GPA, ZC, SPA, IS, which is maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and recommended action to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report, adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and adopt Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, in Resolution 14-2011, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council certify the Final Resolution No. 2011 — 118 June 7, 2011 Page Two Environmental Impact Report, adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and adopt Findings of Fact and a Statement of overriding Considerations for the Comprehensive Land Use Update (identified as the "proposed project" in the Draft Environmental Impact Report and FEIR); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City considered said FEIR, MMRP, and SOC, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and have caused and duly held studies and proceedings for the timely amendment to the General Plan of the City of National City, pursuant to Title 7, Chapter 3, Article 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, and WHEREAS, the City Council at a duly advertised public hearing held on June 7, 2011, considered the proposed General Plan Update, Land Use Code Update (zoning changes), Climate Action Plan, Downtown Specific Plan Amendment, and five development proposals (street conversion/community corridors, Senior Village Expansion, Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, Kimball Park Master Plan, and El Toyon Park Master Plan), along with all evidence and testimony presented at said hearing, and along with the Environmental Impact Report to assess project impacts of approving the General Plan Amendment and zone changes and adopting the Westside Specific Plan together with any comments received; and WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by state law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council at the public hearing held on June 7, 2011, support the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B," respectively, and incorporated herein as though fully set forth. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Final Environmental Impact Report and hereby certifies said Final Environmental Impact Report and adopts the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, based on the following findings: 1. The Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR") has been completed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and is on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information in the FEIR before recommending approval of the Comprehensive Land Use Update ("proposed project"). 3. The FEIR was presented to the City Council, and that the City Council reviewed and considered the information contained in the FEIR prior to approving the project. Resolution No. 2011 — 118 June 7, 2011 Page Three 4. The FEIR reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. 5. On the basis of the whole record, including written comments and responses, there is substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 6. Based on the FEIR and the analysis provided therein, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") fully contained within Chapter 6 of the FEIR and attached hereto as Exhibit "B" has been prepared to report and monitor the changes (the City's mitigation measures) which have been incorporated into the proposed project. 7. The mitigation measures that have been identified as feasible mitigation measures that will mitigate potential adverse environmental impacts have been incorporated into the Mitigation Monitoring and Report Program for the Comprehensive Land Use Update, and all applicable feasible mitigation measures will be incorporated in future development discretionary applications as conditions of approval and are enforceable through the permit conditions. 8. With respect to those potential adverse environmental impacts that cannot be mitigated to below a level of significant impact, there exist economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits that outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts, as set forth in the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. 9. The Findings of Fact Regarding Significant Environmental Effects contained in the FEIR are incorporated herein as though fully set forth. 10. The alternatives proposed are each rejected, as explained in the FEIR, because they are not environmentally superior to the proposed project and do not meet General Plan objectives, and the No Project Alternative (Alternative 1) results in lower densities within National City, and dispersed densities throughout the City; the Distributed Growth Alternative (Alternative 2) would reduce impacts on aesthetics, population and housing, and public services and recreation, but would not meet project objectives for targeting development along transit corridors, urban and community centers, and near transit stations, increasing walkability, and improving public health by eliminating barriers to physical activity; the Centralized Growth Alternative (Alternative 3) would reduce regional impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, and transportation and circulation, but would increase local impacts on air quality, geology, soils and mineral resources, noise, public services and recreation, transportation and circulation, and utilities and service systems; and the Existing Street Conversion/Community Corridors Alternative (No Project Alternative), Reduced Street Conversions/Community Corridors Alternative, Existing Senior Village Expansion Alternative (No Project Alternative), Reduced Senior Village Expansion Alternative, Existing Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative), Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative, Existing Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative), Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative, Existing El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative), and Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative would not achieve the Guiding Principles or General Plan objectives, which emphasize the importance of linking land use and transportation planning, increasing the walkability of the city, improving the living conditions and health Resolution No. 2011 — 118 June 7, 2011 Page Four of residents through compact and mixed -use transit -oriented development, and eliminating barriers to physical activity, and enhancing residential neighborhoods by increasing access to park and recreational space. 11. The documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which the Planning Commission based its findings and recommendations to the City Council to certify the Final Environmental Impact Report are located at the City of National City, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City. The custodian for these documents is the City Clerk of the City of National City. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 15091(e). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the Findings of Fact and the Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Exhibit "A", incorporated herein as though fully set forth, stating why the projects' benefits override and outweigh its unavoidable impacts. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", incorporated herein as though set forth. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council has considered the proposed Final Environmental Impact Report, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Findings of Fact, and Statement of Overriding Considerations prepared to assess the impacts of adoption of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, and that together with any comments received during the public review process, in making these findings on the basis of the whole record and any comments. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Final Environmental Impact Report is certified, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations are adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the resolution is adopted. PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2011. ATTEST: Michael R. Della, City Clerk Ron Morrison, Mayor ROV AS TO FORM: I. dia City Att Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California, on June 7, 2011 by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Councilmembers Morrison, Natividad, Rios, Sotelo-Solis, Zarate. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: None. AUTHENTICATED BY: RON MORRISON Mayor of the City of National City, California r City Clerk of the City National City, California By: Deputy I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2011-118 of the City of National City, Califomia, passed and adopted by the Council of said City on June 7, 2011. City Clerk of the City of National City, California By: Deputy Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Comprehensive Land Use Update Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2010051009) Prepared for: City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Contact: Ray Pe Prepared by: The Planning CenterIDC&E 750 W. Fir Street, Suite 405 San Diego, CA 92101 Contact: Brooke Peterson May 2011 EXHIBIT "A" TABLE OF CONTENTS I . INTRODUCTION 1-1 2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2-1 3. FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS 3-1 4. FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 4-1 5. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 5-1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS I INTRODUCTION This document contains the proposed CEQA Findings (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines' Section 15091) and the Statement of Overriding Considerations (pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093). Chapter 1, Introduction, pro- vides background information as to the purpose of the documents. Chapter 2, Project Description, provides a description of the project being adopted. This includes the proposed project described in the DEIR, modified in the Final EIR (including the City's proposed Mitigation Measures), and any modifications incorporated the City prior to project approval. Chapter 3, Findings Regarding Significant Environmental Effects, makes written findings for each of those significant effects from the project, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding. Chapter 4, Project Alternatives, provides a brief discussion of other alternatives that were evaluated in the environmental impact report (EIR). Finally, Chapter 5, Statement of Overrid- ing Considerations, is provided to balance, economic, legal, social, technologi- cal, or other benefits, including region wide or statewide environmental bene- fits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project.. Mitigation measures are referenced in the mitigation monitoring and report- ing program (MMRP) adopted concurrently with these findings and will be effectuated through the process of implementing the project. Except as otherwise noted, the findings reported in the following pages in- corporate the facts and discussions of environmental impacts that are found in the Final environmental impact report (Final EIR) for the National City Comprehensive I.and Use Update, May 2011, as fully set forth therein. These findings constitute the decisionmakers' rationale and support for their deci- sion under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). For each of the significant project or cumulative impacts associated with the project, the following information is provided: California Code of Regulations, Title 14, 15000 et seq. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS INTRODUCTION • Description of Significant Effect. A specific description of each signifi- cant environmental impact identified in the Final EIR (e.g. Impact AQ- la); • Proposed Mitigation. Mitigation measures or actions that are proposed for implementation as part of the project (e.g. MM AQ-1a); • Finding. The findings made are those allowed by Public Resources Code Section 21081 (PRC) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091. For impacts found to be significant, one of three specific findings is made, in accor- dance with the statement of acceptable findings provided in Section 15091 of the State CEQA Guidelines; and • Rationale for Finding. A summary of the reasons for the decision. The MMRP for the Comprehensive Land Use Update is included as Chapter 6.0 of the Final EIR, presented for adoption together with these Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations. The custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the Record of Proceedings is the City Clerk, located at 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950. The Record of Proceedings consists of the following documents, at a minimum: • The Notice of Preparation (NOP) and all other public notices issued by the City of National City; • Comment letters received on the NOP; • The Draft EIR for the Comprehensive Land Use Update and all technical appendices (January 2010); • All comments submitted by agencies, organizations, or members of the public during the 48-day comment period on the Draft EIR; • All comments and correspondence submitted to the City of National City with respect to the project, in addition to timely comments on the Draft EIR; I-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS INTRODUCTION • The Final EIR for the Comprehensive Land Use Update, including comments received on the Draft EIR, responses to those comments, changes made to the Draft EIR, and technical appendices; ♦ The MMRP for the project; • All findings and resolutions adopted by the City in connection with the Comprehensive Land Use Update and all documents cited or referred to therein; • All reports, studies, memoranda, maps, staff reports, or other planning documents relating to the project prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies with respect to the City's compliance with the requirements of CEQA and with respect to the City's action on the Comprehensive Land Use Update; ♦ All documents submitted to the City by other public agencies or mem- bers of the public in connection with the Comprehensive Land Use Up- date, up through the certification of the Final EIR; • Matters of common knowledge to the City, including, but not limited to, federal, state, and local laws and regulations; ♦ Any other materials required for the record of proceedings by Public Re- sources Code Section 21167.6, subdivision (e). I-3 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION I. OVERVIEW The City proposes a Comprehensive Land Use Update (CLUU) to update the current City of National City General Plan and portions of the current Mu- nicipal Code. The Comprehensive Land Use Update also includes five devel- opment proposals. Specifically, the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Up- date project includes two primary components: (1) revisions to the City's Planning documents, including a comprehensive update of National City's General Plan, an update to the Land Use Code (Municipal Code Title 18), a Climate Action Plan, and amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan and Local Coastal Program to ensure consistency with the General Plan; and (2) five individual development projects as follows: Street Conver- sions/Community Corridors; Senior Village Expansion; Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan; Kimball Park Master Plan; and El Toyon Park Master Plan. II. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE A. General Plan The overall purpose of the National City General Plan Update is to create a policy framework that articulates a vision for the city's long-term physical form and development, while preserving and enhancing the quality of life for National City's residents. The key components of this project include broad community goals for the future of National City, policies for meeting those community goals, and specific actions that would help implement the poli- cies. The General Plan component of the proposed project contains the fol- lowing Elements: • Land Use and Community Character ♦ Circulation • Safety ♦ Noise and Nuisance 2-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Conservation and Sustainability • Open Space and Agriculture • Health and Environmental Justice ♦ Education The goals, policies, and actions in the General Plan are intended to guide de- velopment and conservation in National City through the horizon year in 2030. The goals and policies contained in the General Plan are then imple- mented through various other actions, such as specific plans, zoning, and or- dinances which are more detailed and specific. 1. Major Components of the General Plan The following provides a summary of the major components of the General Plan Update. a. General Plan Update Content and Organization The City developed the Draft General Plan update within the context of state requirements and the issues and needs unique to the City of National City. The proposed General Plan update contains the following elements: + Land Use and Community Character. This Element designates the general distribution and general location for specific uses of the land, in- cluding population density and building intensity, for residential, com- mercial, mixed use, industrial, public facilities, and open space, and estab- lishes policies to enhance the aesthetic and cultural value of the commu- nity. • Circulation. This Element demonstrates the general location and extent of existing and proposed major streets and other transportation facilities, including major thoroughfares, transportation routes, terminals, and roadways. This element is correlated with the Land Use Element to pro- vide adequate pedestrian, bicycle, rail and transit, motor vehicle, sea ports, airport transportation, and emergency access to serve both new and existing land uses. This Element plans for a balanced multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users of streets, roads, and highways for safe and convenient travel that is suitable to the context 2-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION of National City. Although parking is not identified as a mandatory is- sue to cover, it is addressed in this element of the General Plan. • Safety. This Element provides information about risks in National City due to natural and human -made hazards, and contains goals, policies and implementation measures designed to protect the community and its property from seismic and other geologic hazards, flooding and dam or levee inundation, crime and public safety, fire hazards, and hazardous materials. This Element also addresses emergency response and disaster preparedness. • Noise and Nuisance. This Element identifies and addresses noise prob- lems, quantifies current and projected noise levels and contours from a variety of sources, and includes policies that establish compatibility guidelines for different land uses and minimize exposure of community residents to excessive noise and nuisance. • Open Space and Agriculture. This Element details plans and measures for the comprehensive and long-range preservation, conservation and managed production of open space resources, such as cultural and histori- cal resources, agricultural land, and outdoor recreation, such as parks, trails, and scenic vistas. Agriculture is addressed in terms of "urban agri- culture" considering that National City is almost fully developed. • Conservation and Sustainability. This Element addresses the conserva- tion, development, and utilization of natural resources, including water and its hydraulic forces, forests, soils, rivers and creeks, wildlife habitat, sensitive vegetation, mineral deposits, and other natural resources. Since National City is highly urbanized, many of these topics do not apply. Therefore, this Element focuses mainly on infrastructure such as water supply, sewer, drainage, electric, and gas systems. Although not typically included in this element, these items are addressed here to emphasize con- servation and sustainability through reducing water and energy consump- tion and improving water quality. Additionally, the General Plan poli- cies address global warming. Although the State has not developed spe- cific guidelines on this topic yet, the National City Draft General Plan addresses climate change issues. 2-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Health and Environmental Justice. This optional Element addresses public health issues and their relationship to the built environment. • Education. This optional Element addresses schools, opportunities for the City to partner with school districts, educational programs for people of all ages, libraries, child care, communication, and community partici- pation. b. General Plan Update Goals, Policies, and Actions The General Plan sets out a long-range vision and comprehensive policy framework for how the city should grow and develop, provide public ser- vices, and improve the quality of life within National City over the next 20 years. Only 2.7 percent of the planning area remains vacant; therefore, the General Plan policies focus on reinvestment in existing neighborhoods and directing additional development and redevelopment near transit stations, within urban and community centers, and along transit corridors. By en- couraging development in these areas, established residential neighborhoods will be preserved and growth managed consistent with regional policy rec- ommendations established by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). Each Element of the General Plan contains background information and a series of goals, policies, and implementation measures. The goals, policies, and implementation measures provide guidance to the City on how to direct change and manage its resources over the next 20 years. c. General Plan Land Use Designations The General Plan defines various land use designations by their allowable uses, population densities, and building intensities. The land use designations described in the proposed General Plan establish the types and intensity or density of uses allowed within the City. In the proposed General Plan, standards of building intensity for residential uses are stated as the allowable range of dwelling units per gross acre. This means that, generally the number of allowable units on a parcel can be calcu- 2-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION lated by multiplying the number of acres by the allowable density. Standards of building intensity for non-residential uses are stated as floor area ratios (FAR) based on net square footage. Density Bonus: Consistent with the State Density Bonus Law (California Government Code Section 65915 et seq.), a developer, upon request, shall be granted a density bonus, incentive(s), concession(s), and/or modification of development standard(s) if the developer proposes to build a qualified project satisfying criteria set forth in the City's Density Bonus Ordinance. This ap- plies to both the residential and mixed -use designations. The following sections describe the proposed land use designations for the General Plan. i. Low-Mediurn Density Residential This designation allows for up to nine dwelling units per gross acre or 33 per- sons per gross acre. This designation provides for single family detached and secondary residential units (accessory dwelling units), and compatible uses. ii. Medium Density Residential This designation allows for 9 to 23 dwelling units per gross acre or 33 to 83 persons per gross acre. This designation provides for a variety of moderate intensity residential uses including detached and attached single-family and multi -family housing, and compatible uses. This designation is typically lo- cated in transitional areas between high density residential uses and lesser in- tensity single-family areas and is intended to retain private yards and patios and other characteristics of single family residential uses. iii. High Density Residential This designation allows for 23 to 75 dwelling units per gross acre or 83 to 269 persons per gross acre. This designation provides for multi -family housing at densities greater than other residential designations. This designation pro- vides for condominiums, townhomes, triplexes, fourplexes, multi -family resi- dential units, group quarters, senior housing, and compatible uses. 2-5 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION iv. Minor Mixed -Use This designation allows for an FAR of 2.0 for the entire building for mixed - use developments (including dwelling unit floor area) and a maximum of 48 dwelling units per gross acre or 172 persons per gross acre. This designation allows for an FAR of 1.5 for single -use developments. This designation gen- erally occurs in a linear fashion along bus routes and provides transitional links between residential neighborhoods and more intense activity centers. It is intended to facilitate redevelopment and transit -oriented design opportuni- ties in developed areas in a manner that is compatible with surrounding resi- dential areas. It provides for a variety of uses including low-rise attached sin- gle-family or multi -family residential development, retail, restaurants, per- sonal services, professional and administrative offices, public and quasi -public uses, and similar compatible uses. The minor mixed -use designation is characterized by high -quality, compact, smart -growth design that promotes a quaint, small-town, village -like feel. A comfortable and attractive pedestrian environment is promoted through the use of street trees; awnings, canopies, or arcades; outdoor seating; clearly - marked crosswalks; and small courtyards or plazas. Bicycle facilities are also provided. Buildings are placed close to the street, parking lots are de- emphasized, and driveway cuts are limited. Building facades include details that add visual interest, distinctiveness, and human scale. v. Major Mixed -Use This designation allows for an FAR of 3.5 for the entire building mixed -use developments (including dwelling unit floor area) with a maximum of 75 dwelling units per gross acre or 269 persons per gross acre. This designation allows for an FAR of 3.0 for single -use developments. This designation gen- erally occurs along major transportation corridors, at major intersections and activity centers, and near transit stations. It facilitates redevelopment and transit -oriented design opportunities at higher intensities than those allowed in the minor mixed -use designation. It provides for a variety of uses including low to mid -rise multiple -family dwellings, retail, restaurants, personal ser- 2-6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION vices, professional and administrative offices, public and quasi -public uses, and similar compatible uses. The major mixed -use designation is characterized by higher density and inten- sity development intended to increase transit ridership and transform signifi- cant activity centers into popular destinations. The major mixed -use areas have an urbanized, community center -type character. Ground -floor commu- nity -serving commercial and retail development is emphasized along with multi -family apartments and condominiums. The major mixed -use areas have a comfortable, multi -modal environment with qualities such as inviting street lamps; outdoor seating; pedestrian plazas; attractive street trees; buildings that face onto sidewalks with wide storefront windows and appealing architectural details; bicycle facilities; and convenient access to transit stops and stations. vi. Commercial Automotive This designation allows for an FAR of 1.0. This designation provides for new and used automobile and truck sales and services and sales and services that support and complement such uses. Other land uses may include alternative fuel vehicle sales, services and related supplies and rental car facilities. Addi- tional compatible uses may be permitted pursuant to a use permit. vii. Service Commercial This designation allows for an FAR of 1.5. This designation provides for in- tensive commercial activities and specialized service establishments. Light manufacturing, wholesaling, and distribution uses are restricted to those that can be operated in a clean and quiet manner. viii. Industrial This designation allows for an FAR of 2.0. This designation provides for em- ployment intensive uses, light manufacturing, business parks, research and development, technology centers, corporate and support office uses, "green" industry, recycling facilities, supporting retail uses, auto, truck and equipment sales and related services (i.e. auto service and repair), large format retail, stor- age facilities, warehousing and distribution, and other compatible uses. 2-7 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ix. Institutional This designation allows for an FAR of 3.0. This designation provides for a wide range of public institutional and auxiliary uses including public, quasi - public, and private facilities. Allowed uses include wastewater treatment fa- cilities, water tanks, electrical substations, cemeteries, worship facilities, edu- cational facilities, community centers, libraries, museums and cultural centers, government offices and courts, medical and retirement centers, public safety facilities (i.e. fire and police stations), and similar compatible uses. x. Open Space This designation allows for an FAR of 0.25. This designation provides for both public and private improved and unimproved open space. Allowed land uses include urban agriculture and recreational areas such as parks, golf courses, athletic fields, playgrounds, neighborhood gardens and community farms, and recreational trails. Open space not used for active and passive rec- reation, such as nature and wildlife preserves, marshes and wetlands, water bodies, public utility areas, flood control channels, and other scenic and open space areas, are also included. xi. Military Reservation This designation identifies lands under the jurisdiction of the United States military. Permissible land uses are governed by the US Navy. xii. San Diego Unified Port District This designation identifies land that is under the jurisdiction of the San Diego Unified Port District. Permissible land uses are governed by the Port Master Plan. xiii. Specific Plan This designation denotes areas that are covered by an adopted specific plan. Land uses are identified within the adopted specific plan. As of the writing of the General Plan, there are three adopted specific plans in National City: the Downtown Specific Plan, the Harbor District Specific Area Plan, and the Westside Specific plan. For additional information on these specific plans see the Specific Plan Land Use Designation in the Draft General Plan. 2-8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION xiv. Floodplain This designation identifies the 100-year floodplain limits for the Sweetwater River and Paradise Creek. These areas are subject to annual review. B. Land Use Code The City has developed the Draft Land Use Code update within the context of State Law (Government Code Section 65800) and the issues and needs unique to the City of National City. The Land Use Code comprises Title 18 of the National City Municipal Code. The following outlines the contents and organization, provides a summary of the major revisions and compo- nents, and describes the proposed zoning classifications associated with the Draft Land Use Code update. 1. Land Use Code Contents and Organization The proposed Land Use Code update includes six major sections: • General Provisions. This chapter describes the overall authority and purpose of the land use code including the jurisdiction, statutory author- ity, purpose and intent, applicability and authority, and responsibility for administration. This chapter defines the rules of interpretation of Land Use Code provisions and rules of measurement identified in the provi- sions. This chapter also outlines the administrative responsibilities and permitting process applied by the City and identifies the regulations and process for non -conforming uses and parcels. These provisions are pro- vided in Chapter 1 of the Draft Land Use Code. • Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses. This chapter includes the zoning map and detailed descriptions of each zone, including the purpose of each zone, allowed land uses and permit requirements, permitted ac- cessory uses, prohibited uses, and general development standards. Zon- ing descriptions address residential, commercial, mixed -use, industrial, in- stitutional, and open space uses. These provisions are provided in Chap- ter 2 of the Draft Land Use Code. 2-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Specific Use Regulations. This chapter identifies regulations for specific uses which are supplementary provisions intended to clarify the general requirements with respect to certain potentially incompatible uses. These provisions are provided in Chapter 3 of the Draft Land Use Code. • General Design Standards. This chapter identifies the general standards and design provisions governing all uses and structures, regardless of the zone in which they are located in the city. These regulations are in addi- tion to regulations and standards otherwise specified in the specific zone descriptions or elsewhere in the Land Use Code. Uses and structures identified include accessory structures, fences, walls and hedges, landscap- ing, off-street parking and loading, outdoor lighting, signs and outdoor advertising displays, site design, and building design standards. These provisions are provided in Chapter 4 of the Draft Land Use Code. • Glossary. This chapter defines the terms used in the Land Use Code and are provided in Chapter 5 of the Draft Land Use Code. 2. Proposed Land Use Revisions The following details the complete list of proposed changes to the Land Use Code (Title 18): • The Land Use Code has been reorganized into five chapters: • 1.0 - General Provisions • 2.0 - Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses • 3.0 - Specific Use Regulations • 4.0 - General Design Standards • 5.0 — Glossary • Applicability, administrative procedures, and other sections that apply globally to National City regulatory processes have been removed from Title 18 of the National City Municipal Code and will be moved to Ti- tle 1. • Nuisance/code compliance issues have been removed from Title 18 of the National City Municipal Code and will be moved Title 7. 2-10 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • All definitions for terms contained within the Land Use Code have been moved to Chapter 5 - Glossary. • Rules of Measurement have been added in Chapter 1 - General Provi- sions for consistency in calculating distances, height, etc. • Permitting Processes within Chapter 1 - General Provisions have been revised to: • Add a minor conditional use permit, which can be reviewed and ap- proved at the staff level. The minor conditional use permit is appeal- able to the Planning Commission. • Modify review of Historic Property permits. The National City llis- torical Society will be given notice of these applications, but will not be deemed responsible for making a report and recommendation to the City Council. • Zoning Designations have been revised to be consistent with General Plan land uses as follows (and described further in the zone descriptions listed in Section 5c below): • The Single -Family Estate (RS-E) zone has been eliminated • The zones and associated development standards for the Two -Family (RT) and Single -Family Extendible (RS-3) zones have been eliminated and replaced with a new Single -Family High (RS-3) zone. Specifically, the proposed RM-3 zone has been expanded to include uses beyond senior housing. • The Multi -Family Medium High (RM-2) and Multi -Family l ligh (RM- 3) zone standards and development regulations have been changed to be consistent with Draft General Plan 2030 designations. • Four new mixed -use zones have been added to the Land Use Code as described in detail in Section 5c. below (MXC-1; MXD-1; MXC-2; MXD-2). These zones apply form -based zoning standards and devel- opment regulations. 2-II CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PRO ECT D ESCRI PTIC N • 0.5 FAR bonus increases for mixed -use developments have been added and will apply to both horizontal and vertical mixed -use. • The Tourist Commercial (CT) zone has been eliminated from the Land Use Code except within the Harbor Specific Plan. • The Limited Commercial (CL) zone has been eliminated and replaced by mixed -use zones. • The Medium Commercial (CM) zone has been eliminated. • The General Commercial (CG) zone has been eliminated and replaced by mixed -use zones. • The Shopping Center Commercial (CSC) zone has been eliminated and replaced by mixed -use zones. • The Heavy Commercial (CH) zone has been incorporated into the proposed Service Commercial (CS) zone and the intensity of allowable industrial -type uses has been reduced. Further, the CH development regulations have been modified to include a proposed height limit of 50 feet and three stories. (No existing height limit). • The Commercial Automotive (CA) zone has been expanded to allow for other commercial and office uses pursuant to a conditional use permit (CUP). CA zone development regulations modified to permit used car sales with a minimum lot size of one acre. The CA develop- ment regulations have been modified to change the existing height limit from 13 stories to a proposed height limit of 50 feet and three sto- ries and increase the existing FAR from 1.0 to a proposed FAR of 2.0. • The Light Manufacturing/Residential (MLR) zone has been elimi- nated. • The Tidelands Manufacturing (MT) zone has been eliminated and re- placed with the Port Master Plan zone. • The Civic Institutional (IC) and Private Institutional (IP) zones have been consolidated into one institutional zone (I). 2-12 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Most overlay zones have been removed. Existing overlay zones that will remain include the Coastal Zone, Height Limit, and Planned Develop- ment (within the Harbor Specific Plan). A Mobile Home overlay zone has been added. • Specific use regulations for Emergency Shelters (Chapter 3, Specific Use Regulations, Section 18.30.) have been changed to be consistent with State law (Senate Bill 2 [2006]). In particular, emergency shelters shall be allowed as a permitted use in the Light Industrial (IL) zone without the need for a conditional use permit and are exempt from CEQA. • Transitional and supportive housing has been added as an allowable use in all residential zones pursuant to SB 2. • Urban Agriculture has been added as an allowable use in residential, mixed -use, industrial, institutional, and open space zones, subject to limi- tations (Chapter 3, Specific Use Regulations, Section 18.30.240). ♦ Neighborhood Corner Store has been added as an allowable use in resi- dential zones subject to limitations and a minor use permit (Chapter 3, Specific Use Regulations, Section 18.30.260). • Outdoor Display or Sale of Merchandise (Chapter 3, Specific Use Regula- tions, Section 18.30.150) has been revised to include fresh produce as an acceptable outdoor display for corner stores and grocers. ♦ Allowable uses and development standards for residential zones have been revised to include standards for accessory dwelling units pursuant to a minor use permit. • Guest houses have been eliminated as an allowable use from the land use code and replaced with second unit provisions. 3. Land Use Code Zones Each zone classification is described below. • Large Lot Residential (RS-1). The purpose of the RS-1 zone is to pro- vide for areas of single family detached homes on large lots (ten thousand square feet minimum and a density of up to 5 dwelling units per acre) and 2-13 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION secondary residential units (accessory dwelling units), and compatible uses. • Small Lot Residential (RS-2). The purpose of the RS-2 zone is to pro- vide for areas of single-family residences on small lots (5,000 square feet minimum and a density of 6 to 9 dwelling units per acre) and secondary residential units (accessory dwelling units), and compatible uses. • Medium -Low Density Multi -Unit Residential (RS-3). The purpose of the RS-3 zone is to provide for areas of low population density (10 to 15 units per acre) single-family attached and multiple family residential areas and community services appurtenant thereto. The purpose of the RS-3 zone is intended to retain the fundamental characteristics to be found in the single-family zones (i.e., private yards and patios, privately main- tained open space, and privacy and self -containment of dwelling units). • Residential Single -Family (RS-4) (Westside Specific Plan). The purposes of the RS-4 zone are to provide for areas of single-family attached and de- tached homes on minimum lot sizes of 2,500 square feet; and provide for small lot single-family development within the Westside Specific Plan area. The RS-4 zone permits one attached or detached single-family dwelling for each full two -thousand five -hundred square feet of lot area provided there is no more than one single-family residence for each 2,500 square feet of lot area. It also allows for the continuation of the existing mixture of housing types and encourages infill with single-family zones on vacant properties and where existing parcels may be further subdi- vided as provided herein. • Medium Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1). The purpose of the RM-1 multi -unit residential zone is to provide for areas of multi -unit at- tached residential development allowing for a density of 16 to 23 dwell- ing units per acre. This designation provides for a variety of moderate in- tensity residential uses including detached and attached single-family and multi -family housing, and compatible uses. This designation is typically located in transitional areas between high density residential uses and lesser intensity single-family areas and is intended to retain private yards and patios and other characteristics of single family residential uses. 2-14 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPION • High Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-2). The purpose of the RM-2 multi -unit residential zone is to provide for areas of multi -unit at- tached residential development allowing for a density 24 to 48 dwelling units per acre. This designation provides for condominiums, town - homes, triplexes, fourplexes, multi -family residential units, group quar- ters, senior housing, and compatible uses. • Very High Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-3). The purpose of the RM-3 multi -unit residential zone is to provide for areas of multi -unit attached residential development allowing for a density of 49 to 75 dwell- ing units per acre. This designation provides for condominiums, town - homes, triplexes, fourplexes, multi -family residential units, group quar- ters, senior housing, and compatible uses. • Commercial Automotive (CA). The purpose of the Commercial Auto- motive (CA) Zone is to provide for new and used automobile and truck sales and services and sales and services that support and complement such use. Other land uses may include alternative fuel vehicle sales, ser- vices and related supplies, and rental car facilities. Adaptive reuse of va- cant buildings/dealerships is encouraged. Additional compatible uses may be permitted pursuant to a use permit. • Limited Commercial (CL) (Westside Specific Plan). The purposes of the Limited Commercial (CL) zone are to provide for small scale, limited convenience retail shopping facilities at the neighborhood level, typically including food and convenience stores, small retail and service shops, professional offices, and artisan activities such as studios, galleries, pro- duction space, and small performance venues; and to ensure that the character of the CL zone will be compatible with and will complement the surrounding residential area. The sale of all merchandise shall be re- tail only. • Service Commercial (CS). The purpose of the Service Commercial (CS) Zone is to provide for intensive commercial activities, specialized service establishments, and other compatible uses. Light manufacturing, whole- saling, and distribution uses are restricted to those that can be operated in a clean and quiet manner. 2-15 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ♦ Mixed Commercial -Residential (MCR-1) and Mixed Commercial - Residential, Smart Growth Area (MCR-2) (Westside Specific Plan). The purpose of the MCR-1 and MCR-2 zones is to provide an area within the Westside Specific Plan area for either commercial or multi -family residen- tial development or a commercial and multi -family development con- structed on a single parcel or as components of a single development on an assemblage of parcels. ♦ Mixed -Use Transit Corridor, Minor (MXC-1). The purposes of the MXC-1 zone are to: 1) support the creation of mixed -use corridors in Na- tional City at a scale compatible with adjacent single-family residential neighborhoods; and 2) create a pedestrian -oriented development that en- hances the quality of life within the corridor and for adjacent residential neighborhoods. Buildings in the MXC-1 zone are built at or near front property lines, parking areas are de-emphasized, multi -family residential and mixed -use buildings provide a diversity of affordable housing choices, and commercial uses provide goods and services for local residents and supply quality jobs. • Mixed -Use Transit Corridor, Major (MXC-2). The purposes of the MXC-2 zone are to: 1) support the creation of mixed -use corridors that function as important activity centers within the community; and 2) cre- ate vibrant places at an urban scale. Buildings in the MXC-2 zone are built to the property lines and mixed -use buildings with housing above retail support commercial establishments within the corridor. • Mixed -Use District, Minor (MXD-1). The purposes of the MXD-1 zone are to: 1) support the creation of mixed -use districts in National City at a scale compatible with adjacent single-family residential neighborhoods; and 2) facilitate the redevelopment of large sites currently occupied by automobile -oriented land uses. New development within the MXD-1 may be oriented outwards towards an existing public street, or inwards towards a new street or civic space within the development site. A mixture of land uses within the MXD-1 zone support a neighbor- hood feel and increase the ability for workers and residents to walk to destinations. New streets established in the MXD-1 zone support a pe- 2- 16 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION destrian-oriented environment and accommodate all modes of transporta- tion. New civic spaces required for large redevelopment projects create a lively focal point within the district. • Mixed -Use District, Major (MXD-2). The purpose of the MXD-2 zone is to support the creation of new mixed -use districts that serve as primary activity centers within National City. Housing, employment, retail, and recreational uses located within close proximity to one another are in- tended to reduce dependence on the automobile. New streets established in the MXD-2 zones support a pedestrian -oriented environment and ac- commodate all modes of transportation. New civic spaces required for large redevelopment projects reinforce the urban design character of the district and provide a gathering place for residents, workers, and visitors. • Light Industrial (IL). The IL zone is intended to accommodate ware- housing operations, storage, office, and research and development facili- ties and establishments engaged in the manufacturing, assembling, pack- aging, treatment, and processing of products other than those that which may be obnoxious or offensive to adjacent residential and business dis- tricts due to reason of odor, dust, smoke, gas, noise, vibration, or other nuisances. • Medium Industrial (IM). The IM zone is designed to provide for the development of medium manufacturing and industrial uses that operate freely of excessive noise, dust, odor, or other nuisances and yet may be objectionable to other non -industrial uses. The IM zone is located west of Interstate 5. • Heavy Industrial (IH). The IH zone is intended to provide for manu- facturing facilities and industries that may be obnoxious by reason of emission of odor, dust, smoke, gas, noise, vibration, or similar causes and therefore require isolation from many other kinds of land uses. The IH zone is located west of the Interstate. • Institutional (I). The purpose of the I zone is to provide for a wide range of public institutional and auxiliary uses including public, quasi - public, and private facilities, most of which are provided in the General 2-17 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT D F S C R I F L I O N Plan Elements established as a response to the health, safety, educational, cultural, and welfare needs of the city. Allowed uses include wastewater treatment facilities, water tanks, electrical substations, cemeteries, educa- tional facilities, community centers, community gardens and farms, li- braries, museums and cultural centers, government offices and courts, medical and retirement centers, public safety facilities (i.e., fire and police stations), and similar compatible uses. ♦ Open Space (OS). The purpose of the OS zone is to provide for both public and private improved and unimproved open space. Allowed land uses include urban agriculture and recreational areas such as parks, golf courses, athletic fields, playgrounds, community gardens and farms, and recreational trails. Open space not used for active and passive recreation is also permissible, such as nature and wildlife preserves, marshes and wetlands, water bodies, public utility areas, flood control channels, and other scenic and open space areas. C. Climate Action Plan The following provides a summary of the major components of the Climate Action Plan. The Climate Action Plan for National City is a stand-alone document containing analysis as well as policies and programs to minimize greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in National City. This proposed Climate Action Plan has been drafted to aid CEQA review, including CEQA Guide- lines Sections 15064.4, 15126.4, 15130, 15150, 15183, and 15183.5. The pro- posed Climate Action Plan contains the following components: • New Programs. This section includes a list of potential new programs, policies, and actions to reduce GHG emissions in National City to 1990 levels by 2020. This list will be based on best practices currently in place by other jurisdictions and other research conducted in sustainability planning. ♦ Detailed Greenhouse Gas Analysis. This section includes a detailed GHG analysis of the selected potential policies, actions, and programs, 2-18 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION and proposed land use and zoning maps using two main modules of the "ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability" model. This detailed analysis utilizes data specific to National City, including local energy use coefficients and regional growth forecasts. D. Amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan The Comprehensive Land Use Update includes revisions to the Downtown Specific Plan to maintain consistency between the General Plan and the exist- ing Specific Plan. The Downtown Specific Plan is proposed to be amended to make the following revisions: ♦ Land Use. Revise Chapter IV to specify permitted uses in each develop- ment zone based on the `preferred land uses,' the `restricted or prohibited land uses,' the design guidelines, and the general guidelines that describe the desired character for the development zones in the proposed Land Use Code. • Review Process. Revise Section V-2 to clarify thresholds that would trigger the project review process. New construction, addition of square footage, loss of non -conforming use, or abandonment of non -conforming use would trigger project review. • Review Process. Revise Section V-4 to amend exemption findings to be consistent with the Community Development Commission (CDC) adopted policy (Resolution No. 2005-54, Section 6). The adopted policy states that the CDC may consider and approve an exemption from the development standards based on one of the following findings: 1. The project dots not exceed the floor area ratio limit for the site; or 2. The project includes a significant public amenity that would other- wise not be required, including more than 15 percent of affordable housing units or commercial rental space that is 25 percent below the market rate; or 2-19 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3. The project makes a significant contribution to off -site public space in Downtown National City, such as street improvements, public plazas, public park improvements, and other improvements that are called for in the Downtown Specific Plan. • Revise the Specific Plan Development Zone (DZ) Boundaries per the following amendments. • Designate the area west of Roosevelt Avenue and north of 8' Street as DZ 1B. • Designate the area west of Hoover Avenue and north of 9' Street as DZ 1B. • Designate the area west of Coolidge and north of Plaza Boulevard as DZ 1B. • Designate west of National City Boulevard, south of 8" Street, north of Plaza Boulevard, and east of Roosevelt Avenue, as DZ 7. • Designate the area west of National City Boulevard, south of 12" Street, north of Civic Center Drive, and east of Roosevelt Avenue, as Institutional. • Designate the area east of A Avenue, south of Plaza Boulevard, north of 11i1' Street, and west of mid -block, as DZ 5A. • Designate the area south of 4" Street, west of A Avenue, north of 6" Street, east of alley/mid-block, as DZ 3. • Designate the area south of 6th Street, west of C Avenue, north of 7" Street, and east of alley/mid-block to the east of National City Boule- vard, as DZ 3. • Designate the area east of Roosevelt Avenue, south of Civic Center Drive, north of 16" Street, and west of alley, as DZ 12B. • Designate the area west of National City Boulevard, south of Civic Center Drive, north of 16'' Street, and east of alley, as DZ 12A. • Designate the civic uses east of National City Boulevard, south of 12' Street, north of 16" Street, and west of D Avenue, as Institutional. 2-20 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Designate Kimball Park as Open Space. • Maximum Allowed Development. Replace Table 7 in Chapter IV, page 31 with the Land Use and Standards table in Section 5 of the adopted Na- tional City Downtown Specific Plan Consistency Review Application Requirement and Procedures. Specifically, the amendment would clarify language by revising "potential allowed development" to "maximum al- lowed development (as specified in the Land Use and Standards table)," and to correct associated calculation errors. • Non -Conforming Uses. Revise the Specific Plan text to add clarifying language addressing nonconforming uses. • Build -To Lines. Revise the Specific Plan to define build -to lines. • Minimum Development Intensity. Revise the Specific Plan to require a minimum development standard of 50% of the maximum allowed devel- opment. • Development Standards. Revise the Specific Plan to specify standards for features including but not limited to parking stall dimensions, court- yards, and outdoor spaces. • Exhibits. Revise the Specific Plan to accurately reflect development zone language. E. Amendments to the Local Coastal Program The Comprehensive Land Use Update includes revisions to the Local Coastal Program to maintain consistency between the General Plan and the existing Local Coastal Program. The Local Coastal Program is proposed to be amended to make the following revisions: For the Local Coastal Program area located west of Interstate 5: • Change the area designated Tourist Commercial located north of 24th Street to Minor Mixed -Use Corridor (MXC-1), but not permitting resi- dential in that area. 2-2 I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Remove the Planned District overlay from the Tourist Commercial area within the Harbor Specific Plan. • Change the Tidelands Manufacturing zone to reflect the adopted Port Master Plan land uses. • Make minor changes to permitted land uses within the industrial zones. For the Local Coastal Program area located east of Interstate-5: • Rezone two parcels from Commercial Automotive (CA) and Heavy Commercial (CH) zones to Minor Mixed -Use Corridor (MXC-1). • Rename the Heavy Commercial (CH) zone to Service Commercial (CS). • Make minor changes to the permitted land uses and development stan- dards in the commercial automotive (CA), service commercial (CS), and light industrial (IL) zones. • Allow additional land uses a in the commercial automotive (CA) zone pursuant to a use permit. • Allow homeless shelters by right in the light industrial (IL) zone to com- ply with Senate Bill 2. F. Comprehensive Land Use Update Projected 2030 Buildout Projected buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update includes all pro- ject components described in Sections A through E and G of this chapter and Chapter 3, Project Description, Sections I and II of the Draft EIR. Based on the methodology described in Chapter 3.0, Section I.G of the EIR, the pro- jected 2030 buildout of the City includes the following (approximately): ♦ 5,091 new dwelling units + 20,362 new residents ♦ 2,642,494 square feet of new retail/office space • 3,179,109 square feet of new industrial space 2-22 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJFET DFSCRIPTION The Planning Area is largely built out with little new land available for devel- opment. The new dwelling units and retail/office and industrial facilities would replace existing buildings. Areas of change would occur mainly in the mixed -use zones, including those identified in the Westside Specific Plan, Downtown Specific Plan, and Harbor Specific Plan areas as contained within the draft Land Use Element. Areas with increased densities above existing conditions may see substantial growth. Specifically, this can be attributed predominately to the change from single -use commercial to mixed -use with the addition of high density residential use. Existing and proposed single- family residential areas are unlikely to be affected. G. Development Proposals 1. Street Conversions/Community Corridors The City of National City proposes to modify portions of the circulation network to enhance the pedestrian environment and safety and increase rec- reational open space, consistent with the objectives for the Comprehensive Land Use Update. The proposed modifications include: 1) closing short se- lected street segments located throughout the city; 2) converting those street segments to pocket parks or future redevelopment areas; and 3) designating key roadways as community corridors. Construction is estimated to start six months following project approval in July 2011. Construction of the seven individual sites would be phased with construction commencing on three sites in the first two quarters and one site in the last quarter. The duration of con- struction would be approximately three months. Based on this schedule, con- struction on the first phase would occur January -March 2012, construction on the second phase would occur April -June 2012, and construction on the third phase would occur July -September 2012. The proposed project includes seven (7) specific sites located within the City of National City as listed below: ♦ Site 1: Hoover Avenue • Site 2: West Avenue 2-23 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION • Site 3: Hoover Avenue south • Site 4: 121 Street • Site 5: F Avenue • Site 6: Kimball Way • Site 7: Q Avenue • Community Corridors. The Community Corridors component of the project proposes to establish street design standards intended to calm traf- fic and increase pedestrian safety. The street design standards are applied to arterials, collectors, and local streets and are intended to increase the comfort of walking and/or bicycling on these roads through traffic calm- ing measures such as on -street parking, bulb -outs, or glorietas; streetscape improvements such as landscaping, street trees, and medians; pedestrian enhancements such as wider sidewalks and street furniture; and bicycle improvements such as designated bicycle lanes and bike rack facilities. The proposed street typology is proposed to be applied to arterials, col- lectors, and local streets throughout the City including, but not limited to, portions of 41 Street, 81 Street, Plaza Boulevard, Civic Center Drive, 151 Street, 161 Street, 181 Street, 22nd Street, 30,h Street, Wilson Avenue, Coolidge Avenue, Roosevelt Avenue, National City Boulevard, D Ave- nue, Highland Avenue, Newell Street, and Palm Avenue. 2. Senior Village Expansion The proposed Senior Village Expansion project is a 7.10-acre site, located southwest of Kimball Way, east of D Avenue, and north of the existing Sen- ior Village complex. The Senior Village Expansion project proposes to ex- pand the existing Senior Village multi -family residential complex to add a total of 200 senior residential units, comprised of 160 one -bedroom units (550 square feet) and 40 two -bedroom units (700 square feet). The new structures would low-rise (up to four stories) with a maximum height of 60 feet and a proposed density of 71 dwelling units to the acre. The proposed project also includes the relocation and new construction of the existing 10,000 square foot Senior Center structure and the construction of a 15,000-squarc-foot 2-24 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION medical office structure. The proposed project proposes to revise the surface parking spaces to 200 and construct a new parking structure with 225 spaces for a net increase of 165 parking spaces. 3. Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan The proposed Las Palmas Park Vision and Concept Plan project is located at the site of the existing Las Palmas Park and National City Municipal Golf Course. The Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project provides the framework and future design of a new park at the location of the existing Las Palmas Park and National City Municipal Golf Course. The Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project proposes to replace the existing park and golf course with 65 acres of recreation uses, pub- lic gathering space, edible landscaping, family -oriented commercial, and natu- ral open spaces. Specifically the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Con- cept Plan project includes: • 1.5 acres of soccer field area. • 12,000 square feet of expanded play ground. • 8,400 square feet of skate park. • 550 linear feet of new trails (5,500 square feet). • 0.62 acres of dog park/run. • 4 acres of community garden plots. • 41.5 acres of passive open space including a lake/irrigation pond. • 162 additional parking spaces to serve the park recreational uses. • Interior improvements to community center and pool house. • 40,000 square feet of new commercial uses on 4.62 acres including 198 parking spaces to be located on the existing driving range in the south- western portion of the project site. • Construction activities are anticipated to include 21,700 cubic yards of cut for the proposed lake/irrigation pond and to grade for level ball 2-25 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION fields, the balance of which would be retained on site; and 500 cubic yards for new parking area which would be retained on site. Construc- tion is anticipated to start January of 2013 and would occur for a dura- tion of five years. 4. Kimball Park Master Plan The proposed Kimball Park Master Plan project is located at the site of the existing Kimball Park, adjacent to the National City city hall and library. The Kimball Park Master Plan project provides the framework and future design to expand the existing Kimball Park. The Kimball Park Master Plan project proposes to expand the existing park with new parking areas, edible landscaping, and natural open spaces. Specifically the Kimball Park Master Plan project includes: • 39 new parking spaces (6,700 square feet). • Grading to allow for 0.85 acres of new community garden plots. Cut and fill associated with grading activities would be balanced on -site. • Recreational trail along Paradise Creek • Vegetation enhancements within Paradise Creek to improve natural habi- tat. • Connection to the street to park conversion. 5. El Toyon Park Master Plan The proposed El Toyon Park Master Plan project is located at the site of the existing El Toyon Park. The El Toyon Park Master Plan project provides the framework and future design to expand the existing El Toyon Park. The El Toyon Park Master Plan project proposes to expand the existing park with new active recreation, passive recreation, edible landscaping, irrigation, light- ing, and new community -oriented structures. Specifically the El Toyon Park Master Plan project includes: • 6,000 square feet of expanded playground. 2-26 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PROJECT DESCRIPTION ♦ 15,000 square feet joint use facility to include a 8,500-square-foot fire sta- tion and 5,500-square-foot community center. ♦ 1.0 acre of community garden plots. ♦ 1,985 linear feet of additional trails. ♦ 0.38 acres of dog run. ♦ 0.87 acres of additional picnic area. ♦ Demolition of 8,200 square feet of existing structure to be replaced with proposed join use facility. ♦ Removal of 19,200 square feet (475 cubic yards) of existing asphalt and subgrade to be maintained on -site. I11. REQUIRED APPROVALS Project approval will require the following actions by the City of National City: ♦ Approval of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, including: • Approval of the General Plan Update • Approval of City Municipal Code Amendments including the Land Use Code Update (Title 18) • Approval of the Climate Action Plan • Approval of the Downtown Specific Plan Amendments • Approval of the Local Coastal Program Amendments • Approval of the Street Conversions/Community Corridors • Approval of the Senior Village Expansion • Approval of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan • Approval of the Kimball Park Master Plan • Approval of the El Toyon Park Master Plan 2-27 3 FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS A. Overview The Final EIR identified several significant environmental effects that could directly result from the implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Up- date. Direct and cumulative significant unavoidable adverse impacts would occur in the following resource areas: ♦ Air Quality (Direct and Cumulative); ♦ Transportation and Circulation (Direct and Cumulative); and ♦ Utilities and Service Systems (Cumulative only). Direct significant impacts in the following resource areas have been reduced to less -than -significant levels through the implementation of feasible mitiga- tion measures: ♦ Biological Resources; ♦ Hazards and Hazardous Materials; ♦ Hydrology and Water Quality; ♦ Land Use; and ♦ Noise. Implementation of the project would have less -than -significant impacts or no impacts on the following resources (without mitigation): ♦ Aesthetics; ♦ Agricultural Resources; ♦ Cultural Resources; ♦ Geology, Soils, and Mineral Resources; ♦ Population and Housing; ♦ Public Services and Recreation; and ♦ Greenhouse Gas Emissions. These impacts are outweighed by overriding considerations, as set forth in Chapter 5. 3-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS B. Findings on Significant Environmental Effects These findings have been prepared for the adoption of the proposed project as described in the DEIR and modified in the Final EIR (including the City pro- posed mitigation measures). These modifications include revisions to the General Plan discussed in Response to Comments 3-5, 3-6, and 7-10, and revi- sions discussed in Final EIR Chapter 3. The proposed project as modified in the Final EIR is summarized in Chapter 2 of this document. Revisions have been made to incorporate mitigation measures into the Land Use Code with adoption of the Comprehensive Land Use Update as below noted in this document. No changes have been made to the Climate Action Plan or De- velopment Proposals since release of the DEIR. 1. Air Quality For a full discussion of air quality impacts and the goals, policies, implemen- tation measures, and "Regulatory Framework" incorporated into the project to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.3 of the Comprehensive Land Use Update Draft EIR and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final F.IR. Impact AQ-1: Buildout of land uses under the proposed Regulatory Changes (including the Senior Village Expansion, and Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan) would result in a higher growth rate of vehicle trips and assumed vehicle miles traveled than population growth in the SDAPCD Clean Air Plan. This would conflict with regional planning efforts to attain ambient air quality standards. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that include updated General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. Although clean air planning efforts (in terms of con- trol measures) can be adjusted to meet the plan objective and take into ac- count the effects of the General Plan and Land Use Code land use assump- tions, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. (See DEIR pages through 4.3-32 through 4.3-43, as modified in the Final EIR.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-32 through 3-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS 4.3-43 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional mitigation is feasible. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding No additional feasible mitigation is available for the air quality impacts that would conflict with regional planning efforts to attain ambient air quality standards. Clean air planning efforts can be adjusted to take into account the effects of the General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. How- ever, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that will include updated General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. Until the RAQS/SIP is updated, the project's impact on air quality would be significant and unavoidable. Impact AQ-2: Construction activity during buildout of the proposed Regu- latory Changes would generate exhaust and fugitive particulate matter emis- sions that would affect local and regional air quality. (See DEIR pages 4.3-43 through 4.3-54.) 3-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in the General Plan and DEIR pages and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15 and 4.3-34 through 4.3-41, as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measures into the project: Mitigation Measure AQ-2a: Dust Suppression. The following enhanced dust control measures shall be required by the City as part of the project entitle- ment process in order to control fugitive dust emissions during construction and shall be incorporated into Title 9, Health and Sanitation, of the Munici- pal Code. These measures are in addition to SDAPCD regulatory require- ments that are currently required for construction activity. • Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph. • Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. • Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. • Limit access to the construction sites, so tracking of mud or dirt on to public roadways can be prevented. If necessary, use wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off the tires or tracks of all trucks and equipment leaving the site. • Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 mph or dust clouds cannot be prevented from extending beyond the site. Mitigation Measure AQ-2b: Exhaust Emission Controls. Projects that have significant construction period exhaust emissions shall reduce fleet average emission rates. Developers or contractors shall provide a plan for approval by the City or SDAPCD demonstrating that the heavy-duty (> 50 horse- power) off -road vehicles to be used in the construction project for more than an accumulated 40 hours, including owned, leased and subcontractor vehicles, 3-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING S I G N I F :CANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS will achieve emission standards similar to in -use equipment that meets CARB certified Tier II standards. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding The Mitigation Measures AQ-2a and 2b are required for any construction activity and would reduce construction -related emissions related to Impact AQ-2 to less than significant. Additionally, mitigation may be required at the project level, but without having specific construction information (i.e. loca- tion, equipment, project design, etc), specific mitigation cannot be applied. For this reason, air quality impacts during construction would be less than significant with Mitigation Measures AQ-2a and 2b. Impact AQ-3: The higher intensity buildout of the Regulatory Changes would increase population and vehicle travel at a rate greater than anticipated in regional clean air planning efforts. This could conflict with regional efforts to reduce unhealthy ozone and particulate matter concentrations in the re- gion. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that include updated General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. Although clean air planning efforts (in terms of control measures) can be ad- 3-5 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS justed to meet the plan objective and take into account the effects of the Gen- eral Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. (See DEIR pages 4.3-43 through 4.3-54.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-34 through 4.3-41 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional mitigation is feasible. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding No additional feasible mitigation is available for the air quality impacts that would conflict with regional planning efforts to attain ambient air quality standards. Clean air planning efforts can be adjusted to take into account the effects of the General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. How- ever, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that include up- dated General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. Until the 3-6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FFCTS RAQS/SIP is updated, the project's impact on air quality would be significant and unavoidable. Impact AQ-4: The project would also result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to a cumulative air quality impact. As described above, in Im- pacts AQ-1 through AQ-3, the Regulatory Changes and Development Pro- posals would result in a significant and unavoidable air quality impact. (See DEIR pages 4.3-54 through 4.3-55 Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-34 through 4.3-41 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional mitigation is feasible. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding No additional feasible mitigation is available for the air quality impacts that would conflict with regional planning efforts to attain ambient air quality standards. Clean air planning efforts can be adjusted to take into account the 3-7 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS effects of the General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. How- ever, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that include up- dated General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. Until the RAQS/SIP is updated, the project's impact on air quality would be significant and unavoidable. Impact AQ-5: As described above, in Impacts AQ-1 and AQ-3, the Regula- tory Changes and Development Proposals would result in a cumulatively con- siderable contribution to a significant cumulative impact to regional air qual- ity. (See DEIR pages 4.3-59 through 4.3-61, as modified in the Final EIR.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-34 through 4.3-41 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional mitigation is feasible. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. 3-8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS Rationale for Finding No additional feasible mitigation is available for the cumulative air quality impacts that would conflict with regional planning efforts to attain ambient air quality standards. Clean air planning efforts can be adjusted to take into account the effects of the General Plan and Land Use Code land use assump- tions. However, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that in- clude updated General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. Until the RAQS/SIP is updated, the project's cumulative impact on air quality would be significant and unavoidable. 2. Biological Resources For a full discussion of biological resources impacts and the goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" incorporated into the project to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.4 of the Compre- hensive Land Use Update Draft EIR and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR, including revised Policy OS-2.21 which includes provisions for working with the California Department of Fish and Game to establish appropriate plant palettes and up to 100 foot buffers for creek corridors, ca- nals and drainage ditches that support riparian resources. Impact BIO-1: Up to 1.2 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (DCSS), located within the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, will be impacted as a result of site redevelopment. Because the DCSS area of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site supports habitat that is theoretically suitable for the federally -listed California Gnatcatcher, it may be necessary to obtain "take" authorization from the USFWS if this species is present on the project site. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 1 Revisions to Policy OS-2.2 were based upon policy considerations and are not relied upon to reduce or avoid a significant environmental impact. 3-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has revised the following miti- gation measure to increase the size of the construction buffer to 500 feet, and lengthen the period during which site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation would not be permitted and incorporated the revised measure into the project. (See Comment 3-6 and Response to Comment 3-6.) Mitigation Measure BIO-1: In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from January 15' to August 31" of each year. Limiting activities to the non - breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory California gnatcatcher. In order to determine presence/absence of California gnatcatchers, protocol surveys of suitable areas of habitat (DCSS) on -site are required. These must be completed by an approved biologist in possession of a Section 10(a) Recovery Permit for this species. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting survey of all areas within 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such 3-10 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-1 would reduce impacts on DCSS, which provides habitat for special status birds, to a less -than -significant level by limiting site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation, within 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location, in accor- dance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, and by requiring a protocol survey of DCSS for California gnatcatcher, and a pre -construction survey of DCSS for active bird nests on the project site. If active nests are found, they would be monitored until the birds have fledged, prior to com- mencement of construction activities. This Mitigation Measure would ensure potential impacts on DCSS would be less than significant. Impact BIO-2: Up to 1.2 acres of DCSS, located within the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, will be impacted as a result of site redevelopment. These areas will he impacted by renovations to the Butterfly Garden and the expansion of the existing International Community Founda- tion Center (ICF) Garden. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has revised the following miti- gation measure to increase the size of the construction buffer to 500 feet, and lengthen the period during which site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation would not be permitted and incorporated the revised measure into the project. (See Comment 3-6 and Response to Comment 3-6.) 3-1 I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Impacts to DCSS, located within the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, shall require mitigation at a minimum 2:1 ratio. Therefore, impacts to 1.2 acres of DCSS will require 2.4 acres of mitigation. This mitigation could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration in the Butterfly Garden and/or other areas of the site. In or- der for on -site habitat creation and restoration to be acceptable as DCSS miti- gation, these activities would need to occur pursuant to a City and resource agencies (CDFG, USFWS) approved Revegetation Plan. The Revegetation Plan would be implemented by the City and would require a methodology for how to establish DCSS in that area. The Revegetation Plan would be re- quired to comply with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 feet of any known mi- gratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from January 15`h to August 31' of each year. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off --site, via the securement of 2.4 acre - credits of DCSS in an approved mitigation bank. If the DCSS is found to be occupied by California Gnatcatcher, a higher mitigation ratio would be re- quired. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, 3-12 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2 would reduce impacts on DCSS to a Less -than -significant level by requiring mitigation at a minimum 2:1 ratio, either on- or off -site. For on -site mitigation, a City and resource agencies (CDFG, USFWS) approved Revegetation Plan would be required for the minimum 2.4 acres of mitigation. For off -site mitigation, a minimum 2.4 acres of mitigation credit would be required in an approved mitigation bank. A higher mitigation ratio would be required if the California gnatcatcher is found in the affected DCSS (see Mitigation Measure BIO-1, requiring proto- col surveys for California gnatcatcher). This Mitigation Measure would en- sure potential impacts on DCSS would be less than significant. Impact BIO-3: Up to 0.8-acre of Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (DFWW), located in the existing golf course in the center of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, will be impacted by creek restoration ac- tivities. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the fol- lowing mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure BIO-3: Impacts to the DFW\SV shall require mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio in the following manner: at least 1:1 shall consist of wet- lands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restora- tion/enhancement. For example, impacts to 0.8 acre of DFWW would re- quire 2.4 acres of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the on - site drainage. It should be noted that if these habitat restoration activities would result in any significant impacts, these impacts would be required to be 3-13 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENV'IRO1\ MENTAL EF- FECTS analyzed and mitigated. Significant impacts associated with habitat restora- tion activities could include dredging in jurisdictional waters or wetlands, the removal of native vegetation, noise impacts to native wildlife during site preparation. In order for habitat restoration to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency - approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Such a plan would be implemented by the City and it would specify methodology for habitat creation and restora- tion. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 2.4 acre -credits of FWW in an approved mitigation bank. Regulatory Agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on - or offsite restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-3 would reduce impacts on DFWW to a less -than -significant level by requiring mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio, either on -site, or off -site within the same drainage basin. Off -site mitigation may be provided by securing a minimum 2.4 acres of mitigation 3-14 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS credit would be required in an approved mitigation bank. A City and re- source agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) approved Wetland Mitigation Plan would be required for the 2.4 acres of mitigation. This Mitigation Measure would ensure potential impacts on DFWW would be less than signifi- cant. Impact BIO-4: Up to 0.1-acre of NVC, located in the middle of the existing golf course on the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, will be impacted by creek restoration activities. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the fol- lowing mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure BIO-4: Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as Non - Vegetated Channel (NVC) located in the middle of the existing golf course on the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, generally require mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this typically must consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.1-acre of NVC would require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the on -site drainage. In order for these activities to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be sub- ject to a City and Resource Agency approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Al- ternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0.3 acre - credits of NVC in an approved mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on - or off -site restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If onsite mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Finding 3-15 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-4 would reduce impacts on NVC to a less -than -significant level by requiring mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. The 0.3 acres of mitigation required, may be provided on -site, through habitat crea- tion or restoration activities, or off -site, within the same drainage basin. A City and resource agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) approved Wetland Mitigation Plan would be required. This Mitigation Measure would ensure potential impacts on NVC would be less than significant. Impact BIO-5: Up to 0.1 acre of Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (DSCSM), within Paradise Creek in the southern portion of the Kimball Park Master Plan site, will be impacted as a result of creek improvements and grad- ing and construction of a trail along Paradise Creek. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the fol- lowing mitigation measure into the project: 3-16 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FFCIS Mitigation Measure BIO-5: Impacts to DSCSM, within Paradise Creek in the southern portion of the Kimball Park Master Plan site, require mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wetlands crea- tion; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.1-acre of DSCSM shall require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via the res- toration of Paradise Creek, including the daylighting of the portion of the creek that is currently underground. The project's current conceptual design shows approximately 3.9 acres as being available for Paradise Creek im- provements. In order for these improvements to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency - approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off - site, via the securement of 0.9 acre -credits of SCSM in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typi- cally allow applicants to propose either on- or offsite restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding 3-17 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-5 would reduce impacts on DSCSM to a less -than -significant level by requiring mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio. A minimum 1:1 of this ratio must consist of wetlands creation. Mitigation may be provided site, on- or off -site within the same drainage ba- sin, or off -site through securing credit in an approved mitigation bank. A City and resource agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) approved Wetland Mitigation Plan would be required for the 0.3 acres of mitigation. This Miti- gation Measure would ensure potential impacts on DSCSM would be less than significant. Impact BIO-6: Up to 0.3-acre of Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (DFWW), within Paradise Creek on the Kimball Park Master Plan site, will be impacted as a result of creek improvements and grading and construction of a trail along Paradise Creek. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the fol- lowing mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure BIO-6: Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as DFWW lo- cated within Paradise Creek on the Kimball Park Master Plan site, require mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3-acre of DFWW shall require 0.9-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site. The project site has approximately 3.9 acres available for Paradise Creek improvements. In order for these improvements to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the se- curement of 0.9 acre -credits of FWW in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or off -site restoration, although on -site miti- 3-I8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS gation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, off -site mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-6 would reduce impacts on DFWW to a less -than -significant level by requiring mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio. A minimum 1:1 of this ratio must consist of wetlands creation. Mitigation may be provided site, on- or off -site within the same drainage ba- sin, or off -site through securing credit in an approved mitigation hank. A City and resource agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) approved Wetland Mitigation Plan would be required for the 0.9 acres of mitigation. This Miti- gation Measure would ensure potential impacts on DFWW would be less than significant. Impact BIO-7: The Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan will impact jurisdictional wetlands and waters through the grading and landscap- ing of DFWW and NVC located within the existing golf course. Mitigation 3-19 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the fol- lowing mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure BIO-7: Because the proposed Las Palmas Park and Facili- ties Vision Concept Plan project will impact state wetlands and State and fed- eral "waters," it may be necessary to obtain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project approval. To that end, it is required that the appli- cant provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-7 would reduce impacts to fed- eral and state jurisdictional wetlands and waters (i.e., DFWW and NVC) to a 3-20 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT E NV'IRON MF NTAL EF- FECTS less -than -significant level by requiring that the applicant provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not re- quired. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. This Mitigation Measure would ensure potential impacts on DFWW and NVC would be less than significant. Impact BIO-8: The Kimball Park Master Plan will impact jurisdictional wet- lands and waters through grading and bank improvements of DFWW and DSCSM along Paradise Creek, in the southeastern portion of the site. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.4.1 through 4.4- 8, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has revised the following miti- gation measure to increase the size of the construction buffer to 500 feet, and lengthen the period during which site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation would not be permitted and incorporated the revised measure into the project. See Comment 3-6 and Response to Comment 3-6. Mitigation Measure BIO-8: Mitigation for wetland impacts associated with improvements to Kimball Park will require a 1:1 ratio of wetlands creation and 2:1 ratio of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3 acre of DFWW would require 0.9 acre of mitigation and impacts to 0.1 acre of DSCSM would require 0.3 acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur onsite, via the restoration of Paradise Creek or offsite through contribution to an approved mitigation bank. Because the proposed Kimball Park Master Plan project will impact State wet- lands and State and federal "waters," it will likely be necessary to obtain cer- tain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project implementation. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notifi- 3-21 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FF CTS cation of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also re- quired prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. (b) In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure pro- ject compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not he permitted during the spring/summer song bird breeding season, defined as from January 15th to August 31" of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting sur- vey of all areas within 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclu- sions and recommendations. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. 3-22 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-8 would reduce impacts on DFWW and DSCSM to a less -than -significant level by requiring a 1:1 ratio of wetlands creation and 2:1 ratio of wetlands restoration/enhancement. The applicant will be required to provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to pro- ject approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has ob- tained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. Impacts to special status birds would be avoided or reduced by limiting construction activities such as site brushing, grading, or vegetation -removal activities to non -breeding seasons, or, if it is necessary to conduct such activities during breeding season, by re- quiring pre -construction nesting surveys which would be provided to the City and wildlife agencies for concurrence. Active nests, if found, would be monitored until birds have fledged, prior to commencement of construction activities. This Mitigation Measure would ensure potential impact on DFWW and DSCSM would be less than significant. 3. Hazards and Hazardous Materials For a full discussion of hazards and hazardous materials impacts, and the goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" incorporated into the project to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.7 of the Comprehensive Land Use Update Draft EIR and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR. Impact HAZ-1: There are a number of sites in National City that are in- cluded on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 (Appendix E) or that need further investigation. Sev- 3-23 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS eral of the sites have reported releases to the ground, resulting in soil and groundwater contamination, and are subject to various State and federal laws and regulators, including the CERCLA, US EPA, DTSC, and RWQCB. Re- development of sites with existing soil or groundwater contamination could potentially pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through releases of hazardous materials into the environment. Although the risk of significant hazard to the public or the environment from redevelop- ment of sites with existing soil or groundwater contamination can he reduced by General Plan policies, it cannot be completely eliminated. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.7.1 through 4.7- 7, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the fol- lowing mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure HAZ-1: Implementation of a new General Plan Policy S-8.4 would require proposed development to determine the applicability of preparing a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP), stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan, (SUSWMP), Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP), stormwater Best Management Practices, and additional site -specific assessment including research, file reviews, and or Phase I Environmental Assessments. General Plan Policy S-8.4, as stated above, has been drafted for adoption by the City Council as part of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update project. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. 3-24 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would reduce impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials by implementing new General Plan Pol- icy S-8.4. This policy would require proposed development to determine the applicability of preparing a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP), stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), Standard Urban Storm Wa- ter Mitigation Plan, (SUSWMP), Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP), stormwater Best Management Practices, and additional site -specific assessment including research, file reviews, and or Phase I Envi- ronmental Assessments. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 would ensure Impact HAZ-1 is less than significant. 4. Hydrology and Water Quality For a full discussion of hydrology and water quality impacts and the goals, policies, implementation measures, and "Regulatory Framework" incorpo- rated into the project to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.8 of the Comprehensive Land Use Update Draft EIR and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR. Impact HYDRO-1: Buildout under the Regulatory Changes could poten- tially result in stormwater volume in excess of storm drainage system capac- ity. (See DEIR pages 4.8-66 through 4.8-72, as modified in the Final EIR.) Mitigation 3-25 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.8-6 and DEIR pages 4.8-1 through 4.8-13, as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measures into the project: Mitigation Measure HYDRO-1: National City shall incorporate into its Gen- eral Plan a policy to regularly assess the adequacy of its storm sewer system to accommodate 100-year storm flows and develop and implement a prioritized plan to address identified capacity deficiencies to the maximum extent possi- ble (MEP). General Plan Policy CS-5.3 is drafted for adoption by the City Council as part of the Comprehensive Land Use Update as follows: • The City shall regularly assess the adequacy of its storm sewer sys- tem to accommodate 100-year storm flows and develop and imple- ment a prioritized plan to address identified capacity deficiencies to the maximum extent possible (MEP). Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding 3-26 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS Mitigation Measure HYDRO-1 would reduce impacts related to storm drain- age system capacity through a General Plan policy to regularly assess the ade- quacy of its storm sewer system to accommodate 100-year storm flows and develop and implement a prioritized plan to address identified capacity defi- ciencies to the MEP. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure HYDRO-1 would ensure Impact HYDRO-1 is less than significant. Impact HYDRO-2: As it is not possible to determine whether implementa- tion of stormwater management practices would be adequate to accommodate 100-year storm flows on the Senior Village Expansion project site, the place- ment of occupied development within a Special Flood Hazard Area could raise the base flood elevation or redirect flood flows, resulting in flooding and damage either on- or off -site under project and cumulative conditions. The Senior Village expansion would also expose people or structures to a signifi- cant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. (See DEIR pages 4.8-66 through 4.8-72, and 4.8-81 through 4.8-86, and 4.8-94, as modified in the Final EIR.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.8-6 and DEIR pages 4.8-1 through 4.8-13, as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measures into the Senior Village Ex- pansion project: Mitigation Measure HYDRO-2a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydrological study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surrounding area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to accommodate 100-year flood flows on site. Measures to accommodate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPs such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. 3-27 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS Mitigation Measure HYDRO-2b: National City shall incorporate feasible measures identified in the detailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Mitigation Measures HYDRO-2a and HYRDO-2b would reduce impacts related to potential flooding as a result of the Senior Village Expansion by requiring a detailed hydrological study to assess the effects of proposed devel- opment on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surrounding area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to accommodate 100-year flood flows on site. Feasible measures identified in the detailed hydrological study would be included in the final project site design to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. There- fore, implementation of Mitigation Measures HYDRO-2a and HYDRO-2b would ensure Impact HYDRO-2 is less than significant. Impact HYDRO-3: The placement of commercial structures proposed as part of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan within a Spe- 3-28 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS cial Flood Hazard Area could raise the base flood elevation or redirect flood flows, resulting in flooding and damage either on- or off -site under project and cumulative conditions. The Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Con- cept Plan would also expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam under project and cumulative conditions. (See DEIR pages 4.8-66 through 4.8-72, 4.8-81 through 4.8-86. and 4.8-94 through 4.8-95, as modified in the Final EIR.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.8-6 and DEIR pages 4.8-1 through 4.8-13, as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measures into the Las Palmas park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project: Mitigation Measure HYDRO-3a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydrological study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surrounding area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to accommodate 100-year flood flows on site. Measures to accommodate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPS such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. Mitigation Measure HYDRO-3b: National City shall incorporate feasible measures identified in the detailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. 3-29 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS RFGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Mitigation Measure HYDRO-3a and HYDRO-3b would reduce impacts re- lated to potential flooding as a result of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan by requiring a detailed hydrological study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surrounding area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to accommodate 100-year flood flows on site. Feasible measures identified in the detailed hydrological study would be included in the final project site design to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on - or off -site. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measures HYDRO-3a and HYDRO-3b would ensure Impact HYDRO-3 is less than significant. 5. Land Use For a full discussion of land use impacts and the goals, policies, implementa- tion measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" incorporated into the pro- ject to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.9 of the Comprehensive Land Use Update Draft EIR and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR. Impact LU-1: Potential impacts associated with conflicts with adopted habi- tat conservation or natural community conservation plan could occur as a result of the Regulatory Changes and Development Proposals. Mitigation 3-30 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.9.1 through 4.9- 7, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the fol- lowing mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure LU-1: The inclusion of policies to the General Plan re- lated to development review would reduce impacts associated with conflicts with the MSCP in the vicinity of the Planning arca. The addition of Policy OS-2.7 would ensure that potential impacts to biological resources are care- fully evaluated prior to approval of development projects. The addition of Policy OS-2.8 would ensure that development is consistent with all federal, State and regional regulations for habitat and species protection. General Plan Policy OS-2.7 and OS-2.8 as stated in the Draft General Plan are as follows: • OS-2.7: Ensure that potential impacts to biological resources are carefully evaluated prior to approval of development projects. ♦ OS-2.8: Ensure that development is consistent with all fed- eral, State and regional regulations for habitat and species protection. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, 3-3 I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Mitigation Measure LU-1 would reduce impacts associated with conflicts with an adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plan through the inclusion of General Plan Policies OS-2.7 and 2.8. These policies would ensure that potential impacts to biological resources are carefully evaluated prior to approval of development projects and that development is consistent with all federal, State and regional regulations for habitat and spe- cies protection. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure LU-1 would ensure Impact LU-1 is less than significant. 6. Noise For a full discussion of noise impacts and the goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" incorporated into the project to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.10 of the Comprehensive Land Use Update Draft ELK and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR. Impact NOI-1: Construction noise could adversely affect sensitive receptors adjacent to the Senior Village Expansion project, components of the Las Pal- mas Park Facilities Concept Plan, Kimball Park Master Plan, and El Toyon Park Master Plan. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.10-8 through 4.10-15, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure NOI-1: Implement Construction Noise Reduction Measures. Title 12 of the Municipal Code shall be amended to include the following standard construction noise reduction measures. 3-32 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS ♦ Equipment Sound Attenuation. All noise -producing construction equipment and vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers, air -inlet silencers where appropriate, and any other shrouds, shields, or other noise -reducing features in good operating condition that meet or exceed original factory specification. Mobile or fixed "package" equipment (e.g. arc welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readily avail- able for that type of equipment. ♦ Use of Electrical Equipment. Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion powered equipment, where feasible. ♦ Distance from Sensitive Receptors. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise -sensitive receptors. ♦ Construction Traffic Speeds, Constn.iction site and access road speed limits shall be established and enforced during the construction period. ♦ Use of Noise -Producing Signals. The use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. ♦ Use of Public Address or Music Systems. No project -related public ad- dress or music system shall be audible at any adjacent sensitive receptor. ♦ Noise Complaint Process. The on -site construction supervisor shall have the responsibility and authority to receive and resolve noise com- plaints. A clear appeal process to the owner shall be established prior to construction commencement that will allow for resolution of noise prob- lems that cannot be immediately solved by the site supervisor. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. 3-33 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT EN V IRONMENTAI FF- FECTS ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce potential construction noise impacts on sensitive receptors adjacent to the Senior Village Expansion project, com- ponents of the Las Palmas Park Facilities Concept Plan, Kimball Park Master Plan, and El Toyon Park Master Plan, through implementation of standard construction noise reduction measures. Title 12 of the Municipal Code will be amended to include these measures. Thereforc, implementation of Mitiga- tion Measure NOI-1 would ensure Impact NOI-1 is less than significant. Impact NOI-2: The proposed Regulatory Changes could result in the con- struction of sensitive land uses where known vibration sources already exist and ground vibration from conventional railroad trains or light rail trains passing through the Planning Area could exceed the guidelines set forth by the FTA if new buildings housing sensitive uses were constructed within ap- proximately 100 feet of the tracks. Because vibration impacts from railroads are based on site -specific characteristics, it can not be determined whether future development under the Regulatory Changes would result in significant impacts. Each site would need to be evaluated for geotechnical conditions and whether or not a potential for groundborne vibration is likely to occur. If potential for groundborne vibration is found, mitigation measures would be required. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.10-8 through 3-34 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS 4.10-15, and as modified in the Final FIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measure into the project: Mitigation Measure NOI-2: Implementation of new General Plan Policy NN- 1.10 would require a study to demonstrate that ground borne vibration issues associated with rail operations are adequately addressed for new development within 100 feet from the centerline of the railroad tracks. General Plan Policy NN-1.10 as stated in the Draft General Plan is as follows: ♦ NN-1.10: Require a study to demonstrate that ground borne vibration issues associated with rail operations are ade- quately addressed for new development within 100 feet from the centerline of the railroad tracks. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would reduce potential impacts on sensitive land uses associated with ground vibration from conventional railroad trains or light rail trains through implementation of new General Plan Policy NN- 1.10. This policy would call for a study to demonstrate that ground borne 3-35 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAI E F- FECTS vibration issues associated with rail operations are adequately addressed for new development within 100 feet from the centerline of the railroad tracks. Therefore, implementation of Mitigation Measure NOI-2 would ensure Im- pact NOI-2 is less than significant. Impact NOI-3: Because vibration impacts are based on site -specific charac- teristics, it can not be determined whether future construction under the Regulatory Changes would result in significant impacts. Each site would need to be evaluated for geotechnical conditions and whether or not a poten- tial for groundborne vibration is likely to occur. If potential for groundborne vibration is found, mitigation measures would be required. Therefore, im- pacts related to groundborne vibration from construction under the Regula- tory Changes would be significant before mitigation. Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, described in DEIR Section 4.10 and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DE1R pages 4.10-8 through 4.10-15, and as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measure into the project. Mitigation Measure NOI-3: Detailed "Crack Survey." Prior to approval of final site design, any project proponent that would propose driving pilings or performing an action that could cause substantial vibrations shall perform a detailed "crack survey" before the startup of construction activities. If pile driving would be the source of these vibrations, pre foundation pile holes should be pre -drilled to the extent feasible to minimize the number of ham- mer strikes required to seat the pile. The survey may be done by photo- graphs, videotape, or visual inventory, and should include inside as well as outside locations. All existing cracks and walls, floors, driveways, etc., should be documented with sufficient detail for comparison after construction to determine whether actual vibration damage has occurred. If damage is found, the project application would be required to compensate for such damages. Finding 3-36 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Mitigation Measure NOI-3 would reduce potential impacts related to ground - borne vibration from construction by requiring a detailed "crack survey" for any project proposing an action that could cause substantial vibrations. The survey would be required prior to approval of final site design and before the startup of construction activities. If damage is found, the project applicant would be required to compensate for such damages. Therefore, implementa- tion of Mitigation Measure NOI-3 would ensure Impact NOI-3 is less than significant. 7. Transportation and Circulation For a full discussion of transportation and circulation impacts and the goals, policies, implementation measures, and "Regulatory Framework" incorpo- rated into the project to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.13 of the Comprehensive Land Use Update Draft EIR and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR. Impact TRANS-1: The standard established for Planning Area roadway level of service is LOS D; however, modifications to the Planning Area road- way network proposed in the Regulatory Changes and the development pro- 3-37 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS posals are projected to result in LOS E or F on 34 roadway segments in 2030 under buildout conditions. The impacted roadway segments and projected 2030 level of service are listed in Table 4.13-7 of the Draft EIR. This includes the following roadway segments: (1) Wilson Avenue, between Civic Center Drive and 18th Street, (2) Wilson Avenue, between 18th Street and 22nd Street, (3) Wilson Avenue, between 22nd Street and Mile of Cars Way, (4) Hoover Avenue, between 8th Street and 18th Street, (5) Roosevelt Avenue, between Division Street and 4th Street, (6) Roosevelt Avenue, between 4th Street and 8th Street, (7) Roosevelt Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard, (8) D Avenue, between Plaza Boulevard and 16th Street, (9) Palm Avenue, between Division Street and 4th Street, (10) Palm Avenue, between 4th Street and 8th Street, (11) Palm Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard, (12) Palm Avenue, between Plaza Boulevard and 16th Street, (13) Division Street, between D Avenue and Highland Avenue, (14) 4th Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue, (15) 4th Street, between Palm Avenue and Euclid Avenue, (16) 4th Street, between Euclid Avenue and Harbison Avenue, (17) 8th Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue, (18) Plaza Boulevard, between Coolidge Avenue and Hoover Ave- nue, (19) Civic Center Drive, between Harbor Drive and Wilson Avenue, (20) Civic Center Drive, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard, (21) 16th Street, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard, (22) 16th Street, between L Avenue and Palm Avenue, (23) 16th Street, between Palm Avenue and Euclid Avenue, (24) 16th Street, between Euclid Avenue and Harbison Avenue, (25) 18th Street, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard, (26) 18th Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue, (27) 18th Street, between D Avenue and Highland Avenue, (28) 18th Street, between Highland Avenue and L Avenue, (29) 18th Street, between L Avenue and Palm Avenue, (30) 18th Street, between Palm Avenue and New- ell Street, (31) 18th Street, between Newell Street and Euclid Avenue, (32) 18th Street, between Euclid Avenue and Rachael Avenue, (33) 22nd Street, between Wilson Avenue and Hoover Avenue, (34) 22nd Street, between Hoover Avenue and National City Boulevard. (See DEIR pages 4.13-46 through 4.13-69, as modified in the Final E1R.) 3-38 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FFCTS Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.13-12, and 4.13- 6 through 4.3-10, and pages 4.13-46 through 4.13-69, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional mitigation is feasible. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding 3-39 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS No feasible mitigation is available for the 34 roadway segments projected to result in LOS E or F in 2030 under buildout conditions. Mitigation Measures are considered infeasible for these roadway segments because they would be inconsistent with the project objectives, they would be inconsistent with the City's policies in the General Plan of promoting alternate modes of transit, and they would result in additional environmental impacts to other modes of transit as well as impacts associated with construction. As discussed on DEIR page 4.13-67, the City evaluated potential mitigation measures for these roadway segments as detailed in Table 4.13-7 and determined they would be infeasible. 24 out of the 34 significantly impacted roadway segments have been designated Community Corridors. As described above and in the project description, the Community Corridors are intended to increase walking and bicycling through traffic calming measures, pedestrian enhancements, and bicycle improvements. Potential mitigation measures would require the re- moval of these improvements, which would not accomplish the project objec- tives, nor the General Plan policies associated with promoting alternate mod- es of transportation, and would result in impacts to these other non -vehicular modes of transit. Such potential mitigation measures would be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4`h 957) For these reasons, mitigation at these intersections is considered infeasible. 3-40 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS The remaining 10 roadway segments are currently built to the limits of the existing Right -Of -Way. To widen these roadways further, sidewalks would need to be removed or reduced in width, which would result in impacts to non -vehicular modes of transit (pedestrians and bicyclists). Recent revisions in planning and environmental law recognize the importance of planning for multiple modes of transportation, which provide for the needs of all users (including pedestrians, bicyclists, mass transit riders, and motorists (See AB 1358 [2008]; SB 375 [2008].). As such, these mitigation measures are also con- sidered infeasible due to policy considerations. Another option for roadway widening would involve the expansion of current Right -Of -Way through ad- ditional property acquisition. Property acquisitions, however, are considered environmentally, financially, and socially infeasible. Property acquisition would require demolition of existing buildings which would generate addi- tional environmental impacts associated with air quality, noise, GHGs, solid waste, and traffic as well as continuing to promote vehicular use. Further- more, widening of these roadway segments would also create a less pedestrian oriented environment and would thus create additional impacts to this alter- native mode of transportation. Such potential mitigation measures would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4`b 957) For these rea- sons, mitigation measures at these intersections are considered infeasible." Therefore, Impact TRANS-1 would be significant and unavoidable. Impact TRANS-2: By 2030, foreseeable growth in the San Diego region could result in substandard LOS on two roadway segments in jurisdictions adjacent to the Planning Area. Sweetwater Road from Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow Street in San Diego County is projected to operate at LOS F, while LOS on Broadway from State Route 54 to E Street in Chula Vista is projected to be substandard. Growth in the Planning Area would generate traffic volume which could contribute to the deterioration in the perform- ance of these roadway segments. (See DFIR pages 4.13-46 through 4.13-69.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.13-12, and 4.13- 3-1 1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS 6 through 4.3-10, and pages 4.13-46 through 4.13-69, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional mitigation required. As part of the County of San Diego's Draft General Plan, Sweetwater Road between National City city limits (Plaza Bonita Center Way) and Willow Street has been identified as a roadway segment where LOS E or F is acceptable, since adding travel lanes would result in adverse environmental impacts. As part of ongoing multi -jurisdictional programs such as Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TSLP), the cities of National City and Chula Vista and Caltrans will con- tinue to implement coordinated traffic signal timing along the National City Boulevard/Broadway Avenue corridor to improve traffic flow and progres- sion. These implementation measures will ensure that impacts associated with increased congestion levels are less than significant. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. (X) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdic- tion of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding No mitigation is required for Impact TRANS-2. The County of San Diego's Draft General Plan has identified Sweetwater Road between National City city limits (Plaza Bonita Center Way) and Willow Street as a roadway seg- 3-42 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS ment where LOS E or F is acceptable, since adding travel lanes would result in adverse environmental impacts. In addition, ongoing multi -jurisdictional programs such as Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TSLP) will continue to implement coordi- nated traffic signal timing to improve traffic flow and progression. These implementation measures will ensure that Impact TRANS-2 is less than sig- nificant. Impact TRANS-3: Even with implementation of RTP improvement actions and National City General Plan Policies, the addition of traffic expected from buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, the Senior Village Expan- sion, the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, the El Toyon Park Master Plan, and other reasonably foreseeable projects in San Diego County would cause six freeway segments on I-5 and one segment on I-805 that currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better to drop to unacceptable LOS E or F in 2030. These impacts are considered significant. Additionally, with the addition of traffic expected from implementation of the Compre- hensive Land Use Update and other reasonably foreseeable projects in San Diego County, the volume to capacity ratio on one freeway segment on 1-5, five segments on I-805, and four segments on SR-54 that currently operate at unacceptable LOS E or F would increase by more than 0.01 in 2030. The contribution of traffic associated with buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update to these impacts is considered significant. (See DEIR pages 4.13- 69 through 4.13-78.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the `Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.13-12, and 4.13- 6 through 4.3-10, and pages 4.13-69 through 4.13-78, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional feasible mitigation is available. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: 3-43 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. (X) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdic- tion of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding No feasible mitigation is available for the six freeway segments on I-5 and one segment on I-805 that are projected to drop to unacceptable LOS E or F in 2030. Nor is there feasible mitigation for the one freeway segment on 1-5, five segments on I-805, and four segments on SR-54 that currently operate at un- acceptable LOS E or F and are projected to increase volume to capacity ratio by more than 0.01 in 2030. The SANDAG 2050 RTP is the forum for di- rectly addressing impacts to CMP roadway performance in San Diego County. This planning initiative is ongoing, and it is anticipated that the Draft 2050 RTP described above, including further improvements to the CMP roadway network, will be adopted by the SANDAG Board of Direc- tors in 2011. However, at this time there is no feasible plan to address im- pacts to the 16 CMP roadway segments listed in Table 4.13-11. Therefore, Impact TRANS-3 would be significant and unavoidable. 8. Utilities and Service Systems For a full discussion of utilities and service systems impacts and the goals, policies, implementation measures, and "Regulatory Framework" incorpo- rated into the project to avoid and lessen impacts, see Chapter 4.14 of the Comprehensive Land Use Update Draft EIR and any revisions contained in Chapter 3 of the Final EIR. 3-44 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIF',CANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF EECTS Impact UTILS-1: There is currently no feasible plan to expand landfill ca- pacity to meet the projected needs of San Diego County beyond 2016. As implementation of the Regulatory Changes, the Senior Village Expansion Project, the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, and the El Toyon Park Master Plan would generate additional solid waste requiring dis- posal in landfill after 2016 and compounding existing landfill constraints, the Regulatory Changes, the Senior Village Expansion Project, the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, and the El Toyon Park Master Plan would all contribute to a significant cumulative impact. (See DEIR pages 4.14-53 through 4.14-60.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described on DEIR pages 4.14-36 through 4.14-40, 4.14-45 through 4.14-46, as modified in the Final EIR. No additional mitigation is feasible. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. (X) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdic- tion of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding 3-45 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECIS No feasible mitigation is available for Impact UTILS-1 because there is cur- rently no feasible plan to expand landfill capacity to meet the projected needs of San Diego County beyond 2016. Since implementation of the Compre- hensive Land Use Update would generate additional solid waste requiring disposal in landfill after 2016, Impact UTILS-1 would be a significant and un- avoidable cumulative impact. Impact UTILS-2: Development and redevelopment under the Regulatory Changes, the Senior Village Expansion Project, the Las Palmas Park and Fa- cilities Vision Concept Plan, and the El Toyon Park Master Plan would result in the generation of more wastewater than accounted for in the 2010 SSMP, and consequently existing and projected capacity deficiencies in the sewer system could potentially be exacerbated with implementation of the Regula- tory Changes. (See DEIR pages 4.14-75 through 4.14-80, as modified in the Final EIR.) Mitigation The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described on DEIR pages 4.14-60 through 4.14-63, 4.14-70, as modified in the Final EIR. The City has also incorporated the following mitigation measures into the project: Mitigation Measure UTILS-2: The City of National City should conduct hydraulic modeling analysis to assess the impacts of the additional wastewater that would be generated with implementation of the Regulatory Changes and revise or rc-prioritize the Recommended Capital Improvement Program con- tained in the SSMP as necessary in order to ensure that the City's wastewater collection system would have sufficient capacity to accommodate growth in the planning area, including the Development Proposals, through 2030. General Plan Policy CS-5.4 is drafted for adoption by the City Council as part of the Comprehensive Land Use Update as follows: • The City shall conduct hydraulic modeling analysis to assess the im- pacts of the additional wastewater that would be generated with im- 3-46 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS plementation of the Regulatory Changes and revise or re -prioritize the Recommended Capital Improvement Program contained in the SSMP as necessary in order to ensure that the City's wastewater col- lection system would have sufficient capacity to accommodate growth in the planning area, including the Development Proposals, through 2030. Finding The City Council of the City of National City hereby finds that: (X) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project to avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR. ( ) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. ( ) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. Rationale for Finding Mitigation Measure UTILS-2 would reduce potential impacts associated with wastewater capacity deficiencies by requiring the City of National City to conduct hydraulic modeling analysis. The City would assess the impacts of the additional wastewater that would be generated with implementation of the Regulatory Changes and revise or re -prioritize the Recommended Capital Improvement Program contained in the SSMP as necessary in order to ensure that the City's wastewater collection system would have sufficient capacity to accommodate growth in the planning area, including the Development Pro- posals, through 2030. Therefore, Mitigation Measure UTILS-2 will ensure that Impact UTILS-2 is less than significant. 3-47 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS C. Findings on Less Than Significant Effects The City finds that impacts to the following resources would be less than significant prior to mitigation for the reasons discussed in the DEIR and the FEIR: • Aesthetics; • Agricultural Resources; • Cultural Resources; • Geology, Soils, and Mineral Resources; ♦ Population and Housing; • Public Services and Recreation; and ♦ Greenhouse Gas Emissions. D. Findings on Mitigation Measures Suggested in Comment Letters Several comment letters suggested revisions to the project as proposed. Re- sponse to Comments in the Final EIR addressed the feasibility of these sug- gested revisions. (See Final EIR Chapter 5.) Some of these revisions have been incorporated into the project (See Response to Comment 3-5 and 3-6), whereas other suggestions would not reduce or avoid impacts, or were already included in the project as proposed (see Response to Comments 4-2, 5-6, 5-7, 5-9, 5-10, 7-14, 7-20, 8-7, 8-10, 8-11, 8-12, 8-13, 8-14), or were determined to be infeasible (7-13. 7-14, 7-19, 7-20, 8-4, 8-5, 8-6, 8-7, 8-15). For the reasons dis- cussed in the Final EIR, many of these suggested revisions were determined to be infeasible and are summarized below: Revisions suggested in Comment 7-13: The comment suggests as mitiga- tion (1) "decreasing total vehicle trips and VMT", and (2) by "reducing the proximity of sensitive land uses to sources of emissions (i.e. freeways and ma- jor corridors). As discussed under Response to Comment 7-13: 3-48 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARD 1 N G SIGNIFCANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS As discussed under Response to Comment 5-6, the proposed General Plan Circulation Element, and DEIR Section 4.13, a number of poli- cies have been proposed to help reduce VMT. However, the com- ment does not provide any additional suggestions for how such a re- quirement could be implemented. The City does not have direct con- trol over VMT. While the City has proposed a number of policies to reduce trip generation and VMT, trip generation is ultimately con- trolled by the will of individual drivers. As to the second suggested measure, the proposed General Plan al- ready contains several policies which address the suggestion. There- fore additional related policies would not reduce or avoid impacts. [See Policies HEJ-2.3, LU-3.6, and HEJ-2.1]." For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 7-13, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Revisions suggested in Comment 7-14, 8-4, and 8-5: The comments sug- gests the following revisions: 1. Prohibiting the siting of sensitive land uses within 500 feet from the centerline of a freeway and strengthen HEJ Policy 2.1 by removing the "where feasible" qualification. While Policy HEJ-2.3 contains some exceptions for smart growth and other related developments, such exceptions are necessary to provide suf- ficient flexibility and to balance other competing planning and environ- As discussed under OPR's 2003 General Plan Guidelines, "given the long- term nature of a general plan, its diagrams and text should he general enough to allow 3-49 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS mental considerations. While air quality is an important consideration, the City has to balance other factors and risks, such as fire risks, flood risks, geologic hazards, hazardous materials, biological impacts, aesthetic impacts, agricultural resources, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise, population and housing, public services and recreation, utilities, GHG emissions, cultural resource impacts, as well as local impacts versus regional impacts. These factors will be considered at the time specific pro- jects are proposed. Eliminating these exceptions is considered infeasible because it would provide insufficient flexibility and would be inconsis- tent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementation and en- sure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See Cali- fornia Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4`I' 957) Furthermore such a revision would place air quality above consideration of other resource areas and could result in increased impacts to other re- sources areas and would therefore not be environmentally superior (i.e. forcing development away from transportation corridors increasing GHG emissions, or forcing development into flood zones or fire zones...)." Furthermore, even CEQA recognizes that there will be times in which mitigation measures are infeasible. As discussed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 "An EIR shall describe feasible measures which could minimize significant adverse impacts."" Elimination of "where feasible" would place restrictions on project specific development even more stringent than those required by CEQA itself. Furthermore, such a restriction without "where feasible" could potentially result in a taking of private property. Lastly, the commenter's suggested policy revision would result in a high number of non -conforming uses and could lead to an increase in urban a degree of flexibility in decision -making as times change." (Office of Planning and Research 2003 General Plan Guidelines, page 14.) 3-50 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT FN'VIRON M ENTAL EF- FECTS decay and blight in those areas. Such conditions could preclude reinvest- ment in these areas which could prevent installation and maintenance of ventilation systems, air filters/cleaners and other effective measures to minimize existing air quality problems and other existing environmental conditions (i.e. earthquake retrofits, etc...). 2. Require a 1000-foot buffer between uses and industrial facilities. See previous response "1". Unlike the freeway buffer, there are a number of different types of Industrial facilities that have different air pollutant characteristics. Even the California Air Resources Board's Advisory Guidelines on Land Use recommend different buffers for different indus- trial facilities (i.e. distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome platers...) To require a 1000 foot buffer would provide the City insuffi- cient flexibility to tailor such buffers to specific proposed facilities and the specific conditions on site. Site specific buffer distances will be con- sidered at the time specific projects are proposed and parcel specific/ pro- ject specific information can be assessed. Furthermore, such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be inconsistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.46 957) 3. Repeat HEJ Policy 2.1 in LU Policy 3.6. As discussed under Response to Comment 7-4, these policies are already included in the proposed General Plan. Projects are reviewed for consis- tency with the whole General Plan, not individual elements. It is there- fore unnecessary to repeat every policy in the Health and Environmental Justice Element or the Land Use Element. Furthermore, repeating poli- cies throughout the General Plan could result in future complications when the General Plan is being amended. For example, a policy could be 3-5 I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS amended in one section, but similar revisions could be missed in another section. While this is not related to an environmental issue, such revisions will be forwarded to the decision makers for their consideration. 4. Strengthening Policies C-1.1, C-4.1 to C-4.7 by incorporating stronger language and/or mandates. A. Policy C-1.1 See response to "1" above. Additionally, it is infeasible to "mandate" transit oriented development, mixed -use and infill projects (Policy C-1.1). The City does not own many of the parcels throughout the City. The decision to build projects, such as mixed use developments, is largely at the will of the individual property owner. Similarly, as discussed on General Plan page 1-16, implementation of the General Plan can take time and is dependent upon limited resources and policy considerations which prioritize programs. Mandating such development would also re- move the needed flexibility to prioritize programs and is therefore con- sidered infeasible. However, it is important to note that General Plan policies should not be reviewed in a vacuum. Projects are analyzed for consistency with the General Plan as a whole. As noted in Response to Comment 5-6, the General Plan already contains policies which require development of multi -modal transportation facilities with certain types of new development projects. Further, the commenter is requesting man- dates that are more restrictive that the California Air Resources Board (GARB) Guidelines. Current draft General Plan policies are consistent with suggested CARB guidelines. Furthermore, such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be inconsistent with the project objectives (one of the project ob- jectives is "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize im- plementation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy con- siderations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957) 3-52 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS B. Policy C-4.1 See response to "1" above. Furthermore, the City does not have legal au- thority to mandate specific work hours. C. Policy C-4.2 See response to "1" above. Furthermore, the City does not have legal au- thority to mandate commuter programs. However, please see Response to Comment 5-6 for discussion of alternative modes of transit, including General Plan Implementation measure PT-10 (Commuter Benefits Pro- gram). D. Policy C-4.3 The policy already "[r]equires new uses to provide adequate bicycle park- ing and support facilities." It is unclear how the commenter believes this policy should be further revised. Therefore, this suggestion would not reduce or avoid impacts. E. Policy C-4.4 See response 4(B) on Policy C-4.2 above. F. Policy C-4.5 See response 4(B) on Policy C-4.2 above. G. Policy C-4.6 The Policy currently states "prioritize attention to transportation issues around schools to reduce school -related vehicle trips. It is unclear how the commenter would revise this policy. It is also important to note that these General Plan policies do not exist in a vacuum. All of the goals and policies have been proposed as part of a comprehensive system. As noted in both the General Plan and the DEIR, the City is already in the process of implementing the safe routes to school program (see General Plan page 3-60, 4-16; DEIR page 4.13-30). Furthermore, many of the street closures and park renovations are designed to "provides a community center that 3-53 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS is integrated into the adjacent neighborhoods and schools...." (see DEIR pages 3-11, 3-71, 3-74, and 3-77). Therefore such a revision would not re- duce or avoid significant impacts. H. Policy C-4.7 See response to "1" above. 5. Strengthen National City Climate Action Plan by: A. Policy A2.b.1. by supporting transit options first, including a functional light rail transit system in the San Diego County urban core. See also Response to "1" above. Further, the City does not have ju- risdiction over the light rail transit system and future system im- provements and investments. Further to support "transit options first" as the commenter suggests would preclude certain other activi- ties that may be immediately necessary (maintenance, repair, emer- gencies, planned improvements) therefore, the City can not exclu- sively prioritize transit first. Furthermore, such a policy would pre- clude roadway improvements that are designed to foster alternative modes of transit such as the proposed street closures and community corridors in the General Plan. Furthermore, such a policy would preclude construction of relatively minor changes to roadways that have low costs and large benefits. Such a policy Tacks sufficient flexi- bility and could result in the creation of additional impacts by pre- cluding consideration of the circulation system as a whole.' Such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be incon- sistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is ' As discussed in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Section XVI, projects are to consider impacts to "the performance of the circulation system, taking into accoun all modes of transportation, including mass transit and non -motorized travel and rele- vant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit." 3-54 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implemen- tation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy con- siderations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957) Furthermore, the land use plan identified in the draft General Plan is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The City of National City is a member agency of SANDAG and wants to en- sure that General Plan and Climate Action Plan policies are consis- tent with the RTP and as such, must allow for an integrated system rather than exclusively prioritizing one project or infrastructure in- vestment over another. B. Policy A2.6.2. by implementing a bike master plan for a bi- cycle corridor: It is important to understand that while the City has taken a number of steps to implement the General Plan, including the Land Use Code and the Climate Action Plan. Implementation of the General Plan will take time and will occur over the lifetime of the plan, as discussed further on General Plan page 1-16 (see also Government Code Section 65400). It is not feasible to provide every implementa- tion measure for the General Plan, or every potential municipal code revision at this time. However, in 2011, the City adopted a Bike Master Plan. Furthermore, SANDAG has also recently adopted the San Diego Regional Bicycle Plan (May 2010) (see DEIR page 4.13-9). Therefore the suggested revision would not reduce or avoid signifi- cant impacts. C. Policy B3.a.1. by adopting a 100 percent Clean Vehicle Re- placement Policy for the City fleet and contracted fleet ser- vices (see also Policy CS-1.4). 3-55 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS See also Response to "1" above. Further, it is infeasible to require the city to adopt a 100 percent clean vehicle replacement policy. It is necessary for the City to maintain discretion regarding its vehicle re- placement policy based on economic availability and best available vehicle technology (e.g. fire engines). The City can not commit at this time to a 100 percent replacement policy. Furthermore, such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be incon- sistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implemen- tation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy con- siderations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957) For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 7-14, 8-4 and 8-5, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considera- tions, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alterna- tives identified in the Final EIR. Revisions suggested in Comment 7-19 and 8-6: The comments suggests the following revisions: 1. GPU Policies S-7.1 and S-7.2 may be changed to "require" as opposed to merely "promote" use of BACT and may be extended to apply to all industrial facilities, not just City operations: As discussed in Response to Comments 7-19 and 8-6: While the City will promote hazardous waste minimization, it will not always be possible to "require" this for both existing and new fa- cilities. Feasibility would need to be evaluated on a project -by -project 3-56 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS basis and the City would need to be able to demonstrate financial feasibility. This area is heavily regulated and in many instances the City is preempted by Federal law. Policies S-7.1 and S-7.2 have been changed to add "where feasible" so as to use BACT to the extent fea- sible. 2. Periodic review and reevaluation of BACT every few years would mitigate potential impacts: The comment suggests that Best Available control technology dis- cussed in Policy S-7.1 be reviewed "every few years." It is important to note that the contents of a General Plan are governed by Gov- ernment Code Sections 65300 et seq. The City has provided a num- ber of implementation measures, including the proposed Land Use Code, however it is not possible to draft every potential ordinance and implementation measure that will be implemented over the life- time of the project at this time. Government Code 65400 contem- plates implementation of a General Plan as an ongoing process which includes an annual report on implementation (see also General Plan Implementation Measure ME-14). The level of detail recommended by the commenter will be considered in future ordinances (as noted under Implementation Measure PT-23), however it is not possible to adopt this level of detail for the full General Plan and complete the project within a "reasonable period of time" (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15364). For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 7-19 and 8-6, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considera- tions, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alterna- tives identified in the Final EIR. 3-57 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS Revisions Suggested in Comment 7-20 and 8-7: As discussed in Response to Comment 7-20 and 8-7: This comment focuses on the Health and Environmental Justice Element of the proposed General Plan and is not related to the DEIR. Furthermore, existing lead based paint is not an impact of the proposed project but is part of baseline conditions (see Response to Comment 7-7 for greater details). The comment further suggests the failure of the DEIR to mention the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program or threat of lead -based paint exposure during redevelop- ment. The Housing Rehabilitation Program is no longer in exis- tence. Furthermore, exposure to and removal of lead -based paint is governed by federal regulatory requirements. As discussed on DEIR page 3-17, "the proposed project does not stand alone from a regula- tory perspective. Development within the City must comply with other federal, State, and local regulations." Existing regulations pro- vide for the safe removal of lead based paint (see 15 USC §2682; 40 CFR Part 745). Lead based paint removal is required for "[r]enovations in target housing' or child -occupied facilities..." (40 CFR Part 745.82). This includes the requirement that parties remov- ing lead based paint be properly trained and certified to ensure that the work is performed safely (see 40 CFR Part 745.80).5 See also Cali- fornia regulations related to lead based paint removal under 14 Cal. ° "The term "target housing" means any housing constructed prior to 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless any child who is less than 6 years of age resides or is expected to reside in such housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any 0-bedroom dwelling. In the case of jurisdictions which banned the sale or use of lead -based paint prior to 1978, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, at the Secretary's discretion, may designate an earlier date." (15 USC § 2681(17).) 5 These requirements are summarized by the EPA at: http://www.epa. gov/compliance/resources/newsletters/civil/enfalert/leadpaint. pdf 3-58 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS Code Regs. Section 1532.1. There are numerous additional lead based paint programs in California.' For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 7-20 and 8-7, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Revisions Suggested in Comment 8-10: The comment suggests the follow- ing revisions: Amend Goal CS-6: Energy utilities sufficient to meet existing and future demand, and facilities and maintenance practices that are effi cient and sensitive to the natural and urban landscape achieve 1990 emissions by 2020 and 80% below 1990 ghg emissions by 2050. As discussed in Response to Comment 8-10: In addition, the Climate Action Plan is part of the proposed project and states on page 3-2: "National City has adopted a reduction target of 15 percent below 2005/2006 baseline emission levels by the year 2020 [equivalent to 1990 levels by 2020], with additional reduc- tions by the year 2030, for both community -wide and gov- ernment operations." As discussed on DEIR page 3-17, "the proposed project does not stand alone from a regulatory 6 See 17 Cal. Code Regs. 33001 et seq., 17 Ca1. Code Regs. 35001 et seq., 17 Ca1. Code Regs. 37000 et seq., 17 Cal. Code Regs. 38001 et seq., 22 Cal. Code. Regs. 69100 et seq. 3-59 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS perspective. Development within the City must comply with other federal, State, and local regulations." The DEIR notes that the suggested GHG reduction targets already exist through AB32 and Executive Order S-3-05. It is therefore not necessary to repeat these requirements in this goal in the General Plan. Furthermore, the existing goal is intended to be broader than the recommended revision. Specific targets should not be included in a General Plan goal. Desired targets are identified in Section 5 of the General Plan (Indicators). This section lists several ways that the City can measure its progress towards reaching its goals and policies. Measuring greenhouse gas emissions is one of the indicators and fu- ture emission inventories will allow the City to identify if emissions targets will be met. CEQA only requires a reduction in impacts in comparison to exist- ing conditions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a).) The suggested revisions are therefore not necessary from a CEQA perspective as ex- isting conditions are beyond the scope of the EIR to fix (see Watson- ville Pilots Association v. City of Watsonville (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 1059). For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 8-10, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Revisions Suggested in Comment 8-11: The comment suggests the follow- ing new goal: 3-60 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS New Goal: Meet 50% of citywide electricity needs with clean energy by 2020. As discussed in Response to Comment 8-11: As noted on DEIR page 4.14-103 "In the third quarter of 2010 SDG&E provided 10.5% of its electricity from renewables." This figure was recently updated after the publication of the DEIR; SDG&E produced 11.9% of their electricity from renewable energy sources in 2010 (18% average statewide).14 As also noted on DEIR page 4.15-6 the State has already enacted a renewable portfolio re- quirement. The enacting statutes were recently amended to require 33% of electricity generation from retail sales to be produced from renewable sources by 2020 (see Senate Bill Xl 2 [2011]). Further, the City has limited control over how energy is produced for the City. As noted in the previous response, CEQA only requires a reduction in impacts in comparison to existing conditions (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a).) The suggested revisions are therefore not neces- sary from a CEQA perspective as existing conditions are beyond the scope of the EIR to fix (see Watsonville Pilots Association v. City of Watsonville (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 1059). For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 8-11, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Revisions Suggested in Comment 8-12: The comment suggests the follow- ing revisions to Policy CS-7.3: 3-61 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- F F C T S Amend Policy CS-7.3: Policy CS-7.3: Consistent with the California Public Utilities Commission's California Long Term Energy Effi- ciency Strategic Plan, e achieve zero net energy use for new residential development by 2020 and zero net energy use for new commercial development by 2030. As discussed in Response to Comment 8-12: As noted in Response to Comment 8-10, the Climate Action Plan al- ready contains a policy which calls for the reduction of GHG emis- sions to 1990 levels by 2020 (i.e. below baseline levels). Furthermore, and EIR is to address the impacts based upon the whole of the pro- ject, not individual components (such as residences and commercial space). (See Big Rock Mesas Prop. Owners Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 73 Ca1.App.3d 218, 277; see also No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los An- geles (1987) 196 Cal.App.3d 223, 235 [analysis required for the project as a whole, not the various components thereof.J.) Furthermore, it may also not be possible to ensure that every indi- vidual residential project or commercial project has a zero net energy use. For example, it may not always be economically feasible to re- quire affordable housing to fully offset their energy consumption. Similarly, it may not be possible to require 100% offset of energy use for new commercial development, which will depend upon the spe- cific nature of the project and parcel. The suggested revision would provide insufficient flexibility to account for the needs of specific projects at the time they are proposed. Such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be inconsistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is "Provide an effec- tive and flexible framework to maximize implementation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See 3-62 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4'h 957) For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 8-12, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Revisions Suggested in Comment 8-13: The comment recommends the following revisions to Policy CS-7.4: Amend Policy CS-7.4: Explore programs to encourage load shifting to off peak hours and explore dem nd response solutions. Develop a plan that will result in peak load shifting and demand response action that will reduce loads on the grid of at least 50% by im- plementing the State of California's preferred loading order for energy use. As discussed in Response to Comment 8-13: The language proposed in the draft General Plan addresses shifting peak load electricity demand. However the policy as currently pro- posed in the comment simply refers to reducing "loads on the grid" by 50% rather than peak load. Furthermore, the comment does not explain how such a plan could be implemented by the City. The "load order" discussed in the comment refers to energy effi- ciency, demand response, renewable, and distributed generation.' As California Energy Commission, Implementing California's Loading Order for Electricity Resources, July 2005. Available at: 3-63 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT FNVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS discussed in the DEIR and the previous response to comments, many of these suggestions are already being implemented through existing programs. For example, there are numerous programs to increase en- ergy efficiency and renewables, as discussed in DEIR chapters 4.14 and 4.15 (including energy efficient building standards). However, the City has limited abilities to control peak electricity demand; most of the measures proposed by the City are more passive in nature, as discussed in the DEIR (i.e. constructing efficient build- ings). A majority of the tools necessary to control peak load demand are actively controlled by utility companies, the California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Energy Commission. For example, the utility companies control "demand response" by im- plementing programs in which the utility can shut off specific equipment to an agreed upon level, cycling air conditioning, or use dynamic pricing and demand bidding during periods of peak electric- ity load. The City does not have control over such contracts or the equipment. Furthermore, peak load demand is not something that should be as mechanically assigned as suggested in the comment (i.e. 50%). The determination of what percentage to reduce peak load is dependent upon a number of factors that are ultimately determined by the util- ity companies and other governmental agencies. In some instances the utility companies may seek to increase/ shift demand depending upon the source of electricity and pricing. Such a policy could inter- fere with these considerations. Furthermore, such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be inconsistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementation and ensure progress towards meeting http:// www.energy.ca. gov/2005publicati ons/CEC-400-2005-043/CEC-400-2005- 043.PDF 3-64 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS RFGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EF- FECTS General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Soci- ety v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4t 957) For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 8-13, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Revisions Suggested in Comment 8-14: The comment suggests the follow- ing amendment to policy CS-7.5: Policy CS-7.5: n_ a:i..u:1: ..r of . ots .,a ei-v.ccs for implementing energy conscrvati n and renewable energy genera tion, including financing districts, energy auditing, and cncrgy effi ciency retrofit services to all residents and busincss owners. Achieve 20% reduction in home energy use by 2015; 40% reduction by 2020. As discussed in Response to Comment 8-14: Please see Response to Comment 8-10 and 8-11. As noted in those re- sponses existing conditions (and existing building) are beyond the scope of the EIR to fix. Please however note that the Climate Action Plan contains a number of policies to decrease energy demand from existing buildings (see Climate Action Plan page 4-2). Furthermore, such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be inconsistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementation and ensure progress towards meeting 3-65 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Soci- ety v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957) For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 8-14, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. Revisions Suggested in Comment 8-15: The comment suggests the follow- ing amendment to Policy CS-7.7: Policy CS-7.7: E•_co.._. e r EED certificat: n for .,11 . icipu1 commercial, and industrial buildings in the city.Require LEED Gold or equivalent for all city new or significantly remodeled buildings and require LEED Silver or equivalent for new signifi- cantly remodels of private sector building construction. As discussed in Response to Comment 8-15: The City supports the concept of energy efficiency and LEED certi- fication (or equivalent) for new development as evidenced by Gen- eral Plan Policy CS- 7.7 (Climate Action Plan A1.b.2, B1.a.3). How- ever, a policy to require all new public buildings to meet TEED standards is not appropriate at the programmatic level and does not retain the flexibility needed to address the variety of project specific differences that will arise under the General Plan. The City supports the full spectrum of LEF,D certification programs and understands that individual projects will conform to their own unique set of is- sues (including financial, technological) to ensure that the appropri- ate degree of energy efficiency design is incorporated into individual 3-66 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL E F - FECTS building construction. The commenter is referred to DEIR Chapters 4.14 and 4.15 for more detailed discussion energy efficiency require- ments for existing and proposed facilities. Furthermore, such a suggestion would provide insufficient flexibility and would be inconsistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is "Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies."). This suggested is also infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Soci- ety v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4`6 957) For the suggested revisions discussed in Comment 8-15, the City finds, for the reasons discussed above: (X) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives iden- tified in the Final EIR. E. Findings on Recirculation The City finds that none of the revisions in the Final EIR, or information or comments submitted before the close of the public hearing would trigger the need to recirculate the EIR. F. Findings on the Custodian of Records The City finds that the Custodian of Documents and other materials upon which the decision is based is the City Clerk, located at 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950. 3-67 4 FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES A. Overview Chapter 5 of the Draft EIR discusses a reasonable range of alternatives to sat- isfy Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states that an "EIR shall describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project." As such, the alternatives discussed within Chapter 5 meet most of the proposed project objectives and would either avoid or reduce some of the significant effects of the proposed project. In addition, as required by CEQA, the No Project Alternative is included in the analysis. All four alter- natives have been qualitatively analyzed at a level that provides sufficient in- formation about the environmental effects of each alternative for comparative purposes and to allow for informed decision -making. The alternatives identified for the Comprehensive Land Use Update are: • Existing General Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Distributed Growth Alternative • Centralized Growth Alternative Additional alternatives to the Development Proposals component of the Comprehensive Land Use Update are: • Existing Street Conversions/Community Corridors Alternative (No Pro- ject Alternative) • Reduced Street Conversions/Community Corridors Alternative • Existing Senior Village Expansion Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Reduced Senior Village Expansion Alternative • Existing Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative • Existing Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative • Existing El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative (No Project Alterna- tive) • Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative 4-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Alternatives considered and rejected from further comparison because they did not meet several of the main project objectives, did not reduce a signifi- cant environmental impact, or were infeasible, include the following: ♦ Low Density Alternative B. CEQA Project Objectives and Section Criteria The CEQA project objectives and purpose for the Comprehensive Land Use Update are described in Chapter 3, Project Description and listed below. Ob- jectives are numbered 1 through 13 for ease of reference within this chapter. 1. Focus future development and redevelopment along major and minor transit corridors, within urban and community centers, and near transit stations. 2. Increase the walkahility of the city through compact and mixed -use transit oriented development. 3. Enhance and expand the system of pedestrian paths, open space pedes- trian connections, and bicycle trails to efficiently link neighborhoods, schools, parks, and employment centers to each other. 4. Enhance existing residential neighborhoods by increasing access to park and recreational space. 5. Increase access to fruits and vegetables through urban agriculture and the creation of community gardens. 6. Enhance community character through good urban design, public art, scenic and historic preservation, high quality architecture, landscape, and gateways and entry -points. 7. Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementa- tion and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and poli- cies. 4-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 8. Provide adequate infrastructure, using best management sustainability practices and measures, to meet the demand of growth and develop- ment. 9. Improve living conditions and public health for National City residents by eliminating barriers to physical activity and increasing access to rec- reational opportunities. 10. Maintain a vibrant economy by supporting a diversity of business and employment opportunities. 11. Reduce environmental justice inequities by promoting the removal of undesirable and unhealthy concentrations of incompatible land uses and providing an equitable distribution of public amenities. 12. Improve the quality of life for National City residents and the region by providing a better jobs/housing balance. 13. Provide a General Plan Update that complies with the applicable legal requirements, including the Government Code (Government Code Sec- tions 65300 et seq.). C. Alternatives 1. Environmentally Superior Alternative The DEIR determined that the proposed project would be the environmen- tally superior alternative. The proposed project was discussed in DEIR Chap- ter 3. The proposed project (Comprehensive Land Use Update) includes two primary components: (1) revisions to the City's Planning documents, includ- ing a comprehensive update of National City's General Plan, an update to the Land Use Code (Municipal Code Title 18), and a Climate Action Plan, and amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan and Local Coastal Program to ensure consistency with the General Plan; and (2) five individual development projects as follows: Street Conversions/ Community Corridors; Senior Vil- lage Expansion; Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan; Kimball Park Master Plan; and El Toyon Park Master Plan. 4-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Finding The City Council for National City finds that the proposed project identified in the DEIR (as modified in the FEIR) would be the environmentally supe- rior alternative. (See DEIR pages 5-35 through 5-36.) Because the project being adopted is the environmentally superior alternative, additional findings are not necessary. Nevertheless, additional grounds for infeasibility for the remaining alternatives have been provided below. Facts in Support of Finding Identification of the environmentally superior alternative involves weighing and balancing all of the environmental resource areas by the City. It is the City's primary concern to improve the health and safety of its resi- dents, associated with Air Quality, Greenhouse Gases, alternate modes of transit, and a jobs/housing balance. Further, the regional impacts to air pollu- tion, potential conversion and loss of agricultural and biological resources, traffic congestion, and GHG would be substantially improved under the Comprehensive Land Use Update when compared with the Existing General Plan (No Project) and Distributed Growth Alternatives. Though impacts to local vehicular travel and level of service were reduced under the Distributed Growth Alternative, the Comprehensive Land Use Update balances the in- creased impacts to vehicular travel with an improvement to regional air qual- ity, provision of alternative modes of transportation, and GHGs. Though impacts to regional air quality, provision of alternative modes of transporta- tion, and GHGs would be further improved under the Centralized Growth Alternatives it would result in greater localized impacts not only to vehicular travel but local air quality and GHGs thereby impacting the health of its resi- dents. Therefore, the environmentally superior alternative is the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update project as it best balances regional and local impacts. (See DEIR Chapter 5 for further details.) 4-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTFRNAIIVES 2. Alternative 1: Existing General Plan Alternative (No Project Alter- native) Evaluation of the CEQA-required No Project Alternative compares the im- pacts of the proposed project against the impacts of not approving the project. This alternative emphasizes lower densities within National City than the proposed project and disperses densities throughout the City. No land use changes associated with the five Development Proposals would move for- ward. Instead, any future development in these areas would be what is cur- rently allowed under the existing General Plan and Zoning map. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the No Project Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding When compared against the proposed project, the No Project Alternative would result in greater environmental impacts on aesthetics, air quality, bio- logical resources, cultural resources, hydrology and water quality, land use, public services and recreation, utilities and service systems, and greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). In addition, the No Project Alternative would not meet most of the project objectives (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12 and 13). Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infea- sible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) (See DEIR Chapter 5 for greater details.) 3. Alternative 2: Distributed Growth Alternative Alternative 2 disperses densities more evenly within National City. This al- ternative would accommodate higher densities than the Existing General Plan Alternative, but lower densities than the Centralized Growth Alternative. As described in greater detail below, the Distributed Growth alternative would replace "Major Mixed Use" land use designations in the proposed General Plan with the existing General Plan's "General Commercial" land use designa- tion along Plaza Blvd, East 8th Street, and along Highway 54. Additionally, 4-5 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES this alternative would replace "Low -Medium Density" land use designations in the proposed General Plan with a "Medium Density Residential" designa- tions in the northwest corner and the east side of the City. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Distributed Growth Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding Although the Distributed Growth Alternative would reduce impacts on aes- thetics, population and housing, and public services and recreation, this alter- native does not achieve objectives 1, 2, and 9 which are targeted to encourage development along transit corridors, urban and community centers, and near transit stations and to increase walkability through compact and mixed -use transit -oriented development and improve public health by eliminating barri- ers to physical activity. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957.) (See DEIR Chapter 5 for greater details.) 4. Alternative 3: Centralized Growth Alternative Alternative 3 concentrates higher densities in centralized locations at nodes of major arterials and transportation centers and limits growth along corridors throughout the city and outside the centralized locations. This alternative would accommodate higher densities than the Existing General Plan and Dis- tributed Growth Alternatives. As described in greater detail below under the Centralized Growth Alternative, the maximum density in the "Major Mixcd- Use District" areas would increase to 80 dwelling units an acre and the FAR' would increase to 4.0. "Minor Mixed Use" land use designations in the pro- posed General Plan would be replaced with a "Medium Density" land use 1 Floor -area ratio (FAR) is defined as the floor area of the building divided by the total project site area. FAR includes all floors of a building but does not count on -site, covered parking. 4-6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES designation along 18th Street. Under this alternative "Low -Medium Density" land use designations in the proposed General Plan would be replaced with "Medium Density Residential" designations on the west side of the City just east of National City Boulevard. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Centralized Growth Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding Although the Centralized Growth Alternative would reduce regional impacts on greenhouse gas emissions, air quality, and transportation and circulation, this alternative would increase local impacts on air quality; geology, soils and mineral resources; noise; public services and recreation; transportation and circulation; and utilities and service systems. While the Centralized Growth Alternative reduces regional GHG, air quality, and transportation and circu- lation impacts, the increase in local impacts would negatively impact National City citizens. Because of the increased local impacts, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations including too high of den- sities, provision of adequate infrastructure, and preservation of community character. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) (See DEIR Chapter 5 for greater details.) 5. Alternatives Considered But Rejected (Low Density Alternative) The Low Density Alternative would substantially reduce the overall density of the project 2030 buildout within the Planning Area. This alternative would revise the Comprehensive Land Use Update General Plan Land Use Map to replace "Major Mixed Use" land use designations in the proposed General Plan with the existing General Plan "General Commercial" land use designa- tion and eliminate residential as an allowed use; reduce the maximum allow- able density within the "High Density Residential" land use designation in the proposed General Plan with a "Medium Density Residential" designations in all areas of the City; and revise Sections 18.140.010-058 of the Land Use Code 4-7 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES update to remove residential as an allowed use. Additionally, this alternative would eliminate all proposed development in potential jurisdictional waters from the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan and Kimball Park Master Plan projects. (See DEIR pages 5-42 through 5-44.) Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Centralized Growth Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Low Density Alternative would reduce the projected 2030 buildout within the Planning Area. As discussed in the previous discussion of "Dis- placed Growth" on DEIR pages 5-33 through 5-35, an alternative such as this with substantially reduced density and growth would have increased region wide impacts and would therefore not be environmentally superior. While this would reduce significant impacts to local traffic to less than significant, it would fail to meet the following project objectives as identified in Chapter 3.0 and is therefore rejected as infeasible: • Focus future development and redevelopment along major and mi- nor transit corridors, within urban and community centers, and near transit stations. • Increase the walkability of the city through compact and mixed -use transit oriented development. • Improve living conditions and public health for National City resi- dents by eliminating barriers to physical activity and increasing ac- cess to recreational opportunities. • Improve the quality of life for National City residents and the region by providing a jobs/housing balance. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant 4-8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT AITFRNATIVES Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) (See DEIR Chapter 5 for greater detail.) D. Development Proposals Alternatives 1. Existing Street Conversions/Community Corridors (No Project) Al- ternative The Existing Street Conversion/Community Corridors Alternative would provide for elimination of both the Street Conversions and Community Cor- ridors components and existing project site conditions would remain. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Existing Street Con- versions/Community Corridors Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Existing Street Conversion/Community Corridors Alternative would result in a potential reduction in impacts to on -street parking from the Street Conversions and traffic impacts from the Community Corridors associated with below Level of Service D levels. While this Alternative would reduce environmental impacts as identified above associated with characteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following development proposal project objectives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Enhance the pedestrian environment and promote walkability. • Calm traffic and create complete streets. • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and access. • Improve quality of life through functional and attractive streetscape. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (Sec California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957.) 4-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ATFRNATIVES 2. Reduced Street Conversions/Community Corridors Alternative The Street Conversion/Community Corridors Alternative would provide for elimination of the Community Corridors component from the Street Con- versions/Community Corridors project. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Reduced Street Con- versions/Community Corridors Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Reduced Street Conversion/Community Corridors Alternative would result in a potential reduction in traffic impacts from the Community Corri- dors associated with below LOS D levels. While the Reduced Street Conversion/Community Corridors Alternative would reduce environmental impacts as identified above associated with char- acteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following development proposal project objectives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Enhance the pedestrian environment and promote walkability. • Calm traffic and create complete streets. • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and access. • Improve quality of life through functional and attractive streetscape. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) 3. Existing Senior Village Expansion (No Project) Alternative The Existing Senior Village Expansion Alternative would provide for elimi- nation of the Senior Village Expansion including 200 residential units, reloca- tion and new construction of the existing 10,000-square-foot Senior Center 4-10 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES structure, a 15,000-square-foot medical office structure, and a parking struc- ture. Existing project site conditions would remain. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Existing Senior Village Expansion Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Existing Senior Village Expansion Alternative would result in the elimi- nation of 200 new residential units, 15,000-square-foot medical office, and a parking structure. While this Alternative would eliminate environmental impacts related to flood hazards as well as short-term air quality, noise, and transportation construction -related impacts, as identified above associated with characteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following development proposal project objectives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Meet the community's need for additional affordable housing units. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) Furthermore, re- duced density would increase regional impacts, and would therefore not be environmentally superior. (See DEIR discussion of displaced growth starting on page 5-33.) 4. Reduced Senior Village Expansion Alternative The Reduced Senior Village Expansion Alternative would provide for the reduction of 100 fewer new residential units associated with the Senior Village Expansion project. Finding 4- I I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Reduced Senior Vil- lage Expansion Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Reduced Senior Village Expansion Alternative would have the following reduction in impacts: • It would eliminate the flood hazard impacts from the Senior Village Ex- pansion associated with building in the 100-year floodplain. While the Reduced Senior Village Expansion Alternative would eliminate environmental impacts related to flood hazards as well as decrease short-term air quality, noise, and transportation construction -related impacts, as identi- fied above associated with characteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following project objectives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Meet the community's need for additional affordable housing units. • Create a dense, compact, and walkable senior housing complex that can be more easily served by transit to provide access to local and regional destinations. • Minimize the costs of development through infill development to more efficiently use scarce developable land. • Reduce the impacts to resources and infrastructure through efficient infill development. • Redesign Senior Village to better use large expanses of inefficient surface parking lots. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) Furthermore, re- duced density would increase regional impacts, and would therefore not be environmentally superior. (See DEIR discussion of displaced growth starting on page 5-33.) 4-12 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 5. Existing Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan (No Pro- ject) Alternative The Existing Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative would provide for elimination of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan including: • 1.5 acres of soccer field area. • 12,000 square feet of expanded play ground. • 8,400 square feet of skate park. ♦ 550 linear feet of new trails (5,500 square feet). • 0.62 acres of dog park/run. • 4 acres of community garden plots. • 41.5 acres of passive open space including a lake/irrigation pond. • 162 additional parking spaces to serve the park recreational uses. • Interior improvements to community center and pool house. ♦ 40,000 square feet of new commercial uses including 198 parking spaces. Existing project site conditions would remain. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Existing Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Existing Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative would result in the elimination of significant environmental impacts. While this Alternative would eliminate environmental impacts related to biological resources and traffic, as well as decrease short-term air quality, noise, and transportation construction -related impacts, as identified above associated with characteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following development proposal project objectives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Minimize costs of development by using city -owned lands to eliminate land acquisition costs. 4-13 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES • Increase revenue sources through the redevelopment of land. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957.) 6. Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alterna- tive The Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative would provide for elimination of the 40,000 square feet of new commercial uses from the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative would have the following reduction in impacts: • Reduce the significant and unavoidable traffic impacts to the intersection at Grove Street and Sweetwater Road from the Las Palmas Park and Fa- cilities Concept Plan project associated with the construction of 40,000 square feet of commercial uses and associated vehicle trip generation. While the Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Al- ternative would significantly reduce environmental impacts related to traffic as well as decrease short-term air quality, noise, and transportation construc- tion -related impacts, as identified above associated with characteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following project objectives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Minimize costs of development by using city -owned lands to eliminate land acquisition costs. 4-14 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES • Increase revenue sources through the redevelopment of land. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) 7. Existing Kimball Park (No Project) Master Plan Alternative The Existing Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative would provide for elimi- nation of the Kimball Park Master Plan including: • 39 new parking spaces (6,700 square feet). • Grading to allow for 0.85 acres of new community garden plots. • Recreational trail along Paradise Creek. • Vegetation enhancements within Paradise Creek to improve natural habi- tat. • Connection to the street to park conversion shown in Figures 3-6 and 3-12. Existing project site conditions would remain the same. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Existing Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Existing Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative would result in the elimi- nation of significant environmental impacts. While this Alternative would eliminate environmental impacts related to biological resources, as well as short-term air quality, noise, and transportation construction -related impacts, as identified above associated with characteristics of the development pro- posal, it would fail to meet the following development proposal project objec- tives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Better integrate the existing community center into the adjacent neighborhood, provide a community linkage along Paradise Creek 4-15 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES through and between the park and other community and neighborhood destinations. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 957.) 8. Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative The Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative would provide for elimi- nation of the Paradise Creek Improvements from the Kimball Park Master Plan project. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative would have the follow- ing reduction in impacts: ♦ Eliminate the biological impacts along Paradise Creek from the Kimball Park Master Plan associated with encroachment into jurisdictional wet- lands and degraded natural habitat. While the Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative would eliminate significant environmental impacts related to biological resources as well as decrease short-term air quality, noise, and transportation construction -related impacts, as identified above associated with characteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following development proposal project objective as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: ♦ Better integrate the existing community center into the adjacent neighborhood, provide a community linkage along Paradise Creek through and between the park and other community and neighborhood destinations. 4- I 6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVE S Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) 9. Existing El Toyon Park Master Plan (No Project) Alternative The Existing El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative would provide for elimination of the El Toyon Park Master Plan including: • 6,000 square feet of expanded playground. • 15,000 square feet joint use facility to include an 8,500-square-foot fire sta- tion and 5,500-square-foot community center. • 1.0 acre of community garden plots. ♦ 1,985 linear feet of additional trails. • 0.38 acres of dog run. ♦ 0.87 acres of additional picnic area. • Demolition of 8,200 square feet of existing structure to be replaced with proposed join use facility. Existing project site conditions would remain the same. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Existing El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Existing El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative would result in the elimination of environmental impacts. While this Alternative would elimi- nate environmental impacts, as well as short-term air quality, noise, and transportation construction -related impacts, as identified above associated with characteristics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the following project objectives as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Provide a new fire station/community center that is integrated into the adjacent neighborhoods and school, offers a community linkage through 4-17 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT AI-TERNATIVES and between the park, school, and other community and neighborhood destinations, and allows joint use of facilities with adjacent school sites. Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) 10. Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative The Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative would provide for elimination of the 15,000-square-foot joint use facility from the El Toyon Park Master Plan project. Finding The National City City Council hereby finds that specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations make the Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative infeasible. Facts in Support of Finding This Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative would have the follow- ing reduction in impacts: ♦ Eliminate the temporary noise impacts from the El Toyon Park Master Plan associated with the demolition of the existing 8,2000-square-foot structure and construction of the 15,000 joint use facility. While the Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative would signifi- cantly reduce environmental impacts, as identified above associated with char- acteristics of the development proposal, as well as decrease short-term air quality and transportation construction -related impacts, it would fail to meet the following development proposal project objective as identified in Draft EIR Chapter 3.0: • Provide a new fire station/community center that is integrated into the adjacent neighborhoods and school, offers a community linkage through and between the park, school, and other community and neighborhood destinations, and allows joint use of facilities with adjacent school sites. 4-I8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FINDINGS ON PROJECT ALTERNATIVES Because of the inability to meet project objectives, this alternative would also be infeasible based upon policy considerations. (See California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Ca1.App.4th 957.) E. Summary Finding Based on the alternatives discussion provided in the Draft EIR and the infor- mation above, the City Council determines that the proposed project is the environmentally -superior alternative that meets the project objectives listed in draft EIR (included above). The proposed project will seek to focus future development and redevelopment around transit and within urban and com- munity centers; increase walkability through compact and mixed -use transit oriented development; enhance and expand the system of pedestrian paths, open space pedestrian connections, and bicycle trails; enhance existing resi- dential neighborhoods by increasing access to park and recreational space; increase access to fruits and vegetables through urban agriculture and the crea- tion of community gardens; enhance community character through good urban design, public art, scenic and historic preservation, high quality archi- tecture, landscape, and gateways and entry -points; provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies; provide adequate infrastructure, us- ing best management sustainability practices and measures, to meet the de- mand of growth and development; improve living conditions and public health for National City residents by eliminating barriers to physical activity and increasing access to recreational opportunities; maintain a vibrant econ- omy by supporting a diversity of business and employment opportunities; reduce environmental justice inequities by promoting the removal of undesir- able and unhealthy concentrations of incompatible land uses and providing an equitable distribution of public amenities; and improve the quality of life for National City residents and the region by providing a better jobs/housing balance. 4-19 5 STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Development under the proposed project would result in significant and un- avoidable adverse impacts on air quality, transportation and circulation, and utilities and service systems. There are no feasible mitigation measures within the responsibilities and jurisdiction of the City that would reduce these im- pacts to a level of less than significant. The Final EIR has identified unavoidable significant impacts. Section 15093(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines specifies that when the decision of the public agency approves a project that will result in the occurrence of sig- nificant impacts that are identified in the EIR but are not avoided or substan- tially lessened, the agency must state in writing the reasons to support its ac- tion based on the completed EIR and/or other information in the record. Accordingly, the City adopts the following Statement of Overriding Consid- erations. The City recognizes that significant and unavoidable impacts would result from the implementation of the proposed project. Having (1) adopted all feasible mitigation measures; (2) rejected the alternatives to the project dis- cussed above; (3) recognized all significant, unavoidable impacts; and (4) bal- anced the benefits of the proposed project against the significant and unavoid- able effects (including consideration of region -wide benefits), the City finds that the benefits outweigh and override the significant unavoidable effects for the reasons stated below. Any one of the reasons for approval is sufficient to justify approval of the proposed project. These reasons summarize the benefits, goals, and objectives of the proposed project. The substantial evidence supporting the various benefits can be found in the preceding findings and elsewhere in the Record of Proceedings (including the DEIR and FEIR). These overriding considera- tions of economic, social, environmental, and other benefits outweigh envi- ronmental costs and justify approval of the proposed project and certification of the EIR. Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update would further benefit the City of National City, as follows: 5-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Economic Benefits 1. The project would promote a vibrant economy by supporting a di- versity of business and employment opportunities. 2. The project would allow for an increase in retail, commercial, and office space, which would provide opportunities to increase sales tax revenue and offer services to residents not currently available. 3. The project would allow for the future development of up to an ad- ditional 2,642,494 square feet of new retail/office space and 3,179,109 square feet of new industrial space. 4. The project would result in an increase in property taxes through re- development of underutilized and vacant parcels that would allow for compact residential and commercial development. Social Benefits 1. The project would result in reduced environmental justice inequities by facilitating and promoting the removal of undesirable and un- healthy concentrations of incompatible land uses and providing an equitable distribution of public amenities. 2. The project would encourage mixed -use development. This would achieve the goal of walkability and an improved quality of life for National City residents and the region by providing a better jobs/housing balance. 3. The project would allow for the future development of up to an ad- ditional 5,091 new dwelling units. 4. The project would implement Paradise Creek as an important source of neighborhood pride and enjoyment by improving habitat, con- necting it to the adjacent neighborhoods, and providing recreational opportunities. Environmental Benefits 5-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS 1. The proposed project is environmentally superior to the existing General Plan, as discussed in DEIR Chapter 5. 2. The project would result in reductions to regional air quality, traffic congestion, and greenhouse gases through the reduction in vehicle miles traveled and increase in resource and energy efficiency. 3. The project would establish the planning framework to improve traffic and pedestrian circulation to enhance mobility. 4. The project would enhance Paradise Creek as a public amenity and natural resource. 5. The proposed project would focus growth within those parts of the City designated "Town Center" and "Mixed -Use Transit Corridor" by SANDAG in their Smart Growth Concept Map, thereby reduc- ing regional impacts, as discussed on DEIR pages 5-33 through 5-35.) Other Benefits 1. The project would improve the health, safety, and quality of life for residents and visitors through access and proximity to transit and services, provision of infrastructure for alternative mode of transpor- tation, increased walkability and enhanced streetscape, access to parks and other recreational opportunities, and access to healthy fruits and vegetables through urban agriculture. Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update (including the De- velopment Proposals) would help fulfill the Guiding Principles of the General Plan Update: • Recognize the importance of linking land use and transportation plan- ning. • Improve the overall quality of life within National City. • Seek opportunities to improve public health and safety. 3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS • Emphasize the importance of schools and education. • Provide a framework for sound economic development strategies. Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update would help fulfill objectives of the Regulatory Changes and Development Proposals compo- nents of the project: Regulatory Changes Objectives • Focus future development and redevelopment along major and minor transit corridors, within urban and community centers, and near transit stations. • Increase the walkability of the city through compact and mixed -use tran- sit oriented development. • Enhance and expand the system of pedestrian paths, open space pedes- trian connections, and bicycle trails to efficiently link neighborhoods, schools, parks, and employment centers to each other. • Enhance existing residential neighborhoods by increasing access to park and recreational space. • Increase access to fruits and vegetables through urban agriculture and the creation of community gardens. • Enhance community character through good urban design, public art, scenic and historic preservation, high quality architecture, landscape, and gateways and entry -points. • Provide an effective and flexible framework to maximize implementation and ensure progress towards meeting General Plan goals and policies. • Provide adequate infrastructure, using best management sustainability practices and measures, to meet the demand of growth and development. • Improve living conditions and public health for National City residents by eliminating barriers to physical activity and increasing access to rec- reational opportunities. 5-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS • Maintain a vibrant economy by supporting a diversity of business and employment opportunities. • Reduce environmental justice inequities by promoting the removal of undesirable and unhealthy concentrations of incompatible land uses and providing an equitable distribution of public amenities. • Improve the quality of life for National City residents and the region by providing a better jobs/housing balance. • Provide a General Plan Update that complies with the applicable legal requirements, including the Government Code (Government Code Sec- tions 65300 et seq.. Development Proposals Objectives • Allow for the creation of additional green spaces and pocket parks. • Enhance the pedestrian environment and promote walkability. • Reduce neighborhood cut -through traffic. • Calm traffic and create complete streets. • Enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and access. • Improve quality of life through functional and attractive streetscape. • Meet the community's need for additional affordable senior housing units. • Provide easily accessible and integrated health care services to serve the concentrated senior population within the Senior Village complex. • Develop Senior Village into a major senior housing community focus area that is strategically located to provide access to amenities that meet senior needs, such shopping, health care, parks, and civic and community centers. • Create a dense, compact, and walkable senior housing complex that can be more easily served by transit to provide access to local and regional destinations. 5 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS ♦ Minimize the costs of development by using city -owned lands to elimi- nate land acquisition costs. ♦ Minimize the costs of development through infill development to more efficiently use scarce developable land. ♦ Reduce the impacts to resources and infrastructure through efficient infill development. ♦ Redesign Senior Village to better use large expanses of inefficient surface parking lots. ♦ Integrate Senior Village into the Paradise Creek Enhancement Project to provide a community linkage through the project site. ♦ Meet the community's needs for additional park and recreation facilities by expanding existing community parks, adding recreation facilities, and adding or expanding programming. ♦ Improve community and neighborhood access to Las Palmas Park. ♦ Provide improved or new recreational amenities. ♦ Provide a community center that is integrated into the adjacent neighborhoods and school, offers a community linkage through and be- tween the park, school, and other community and neighborhood destina- tions, and allows joint use of facilities with adjacent school sites. ♦ Increase revenue sources through the redevelopment of land. ♦ Reduce energy and water use through the redesign and reprogramming of park uses. ♦ Improve community health through the provision of more active recrea- tional uses and community gardens. ♦ Improve community and neighborhood access to Kimball Park. ♦ Better integrate the existing community center into the adjacent neighborhoods and schools, provide a community linkage along Paradise Creek between the park and other community and neighborhood desti- nations. 5-6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS • Better use under -serving park areas through redesign and introduction of new facilities. • Improve community and neighborhood access to El Toyon Park. • Provide a new fire station/community center that is integrated into the adjacent neighborhoods and school, offer a community linkage through and between the park, school, and other community and neighborhood destinations, and allow joint use of facilities with adjacent school sites. For the reasons described above, the benefits of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update outweigh its unavoidable adverse environmental effects, and consequently, the adverse environmental effects are considered "accept- able" in accordance with Section 15093(c) of the State CEQA Guidelines. 7 44 ArAAA A',AA'Ao,A4Aa - AAAAA .q-AAA AAAAAAAAAARAARAA„AAAA A COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE E \IVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT , EXHIBIT 'AA' ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY D E S I G N, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT 750 WEST FIR STREET, NO. 405 SAN DIEGO. CA 92101 TEL: 858 336 0938 FAX: 619 269 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION 1-1 2. REPORT SUMMARY 2-1 3. REVIS ONS FOR THE DRAFT FIR 3-1 4. LIST OF COMMENTORS 4-1 5. COMMENTS AINF) RESPONSES 5-1 6. MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 6-1 APPENDICES Appendix F: Revised General Plan Update Circulation Element Technical Report Appendix M: Biological Field Surveys CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR TABLE OF CONIENIS List of Figures Figure 4.13-1 Existing Roadway Classifications 3-15 Figure 4.13-8 Major Planning Area Roadway Classifications (Proposed) 3-17 List of Tables Table 2-1 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures 2-7 Table 4.13-2 National City Level of Service Classifications 3-14 Table 4.13-10 Level of Service Analysis - Impacts from Buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update on Roadways in Adjacent Jurisdictions (2030 Plus Project Conditions) 3-19 Table 6-1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6-2 I INTRODUCTION A. Purpose of the Environmental Impact Report The Draft EIR identified the likely environmental consequences associated with the project components described in the Draft EIR Project Description. It also identified policies contained in the proposed Draft 2030 General Plan that help to reduce potentially significant impacts. This Final EIR responds to environmental issues raised in comments on the Draft EIR and makes revisions to the Draft EIR as necessary in response to these comments (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15132). Revisions to the Draft 2030 General Plan made in response to these comments are presented in a memorandum that will be considered by City Council as part of the adop- tion of the General Plan. None of these revisions result in significant changes to the Project Description or findings of the Draft EIR that would trigger the need to recirculate the Draft FIR. This document, together with the Draft EIR, is intended to constitute the Final EIR. However, certification of the Final EIR rests with the City Coun- cil; therefore additional materials may be added or modified by the City prior to the time of certification (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15090). B. Environmental Review Process According to CEQA, lead agencies are required to consult with public agen- cies having jurisdiction over a proposed project, and to provide the general public and project applicant with an opportunity to comment on the Draft FIR. This Final EIR has been prepared to respond to those comments re- ceived on the Draft EIR and to clarify any errors, omissions or misinterpreta- tions of the Draft EIR. The Draft EIR was made available for public review on January 24, 2010. Notice of Availability was published in the local newspaper, posted by the County Clerk, and sent to organizations and individuals who have previously requested such notice in writing. A Notice of Completion was filed with the CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR INIROD U C I C N State Office of Planning and Research ("OPR"). The 45-day public comment period ended on March 10, 2010. The Draft FIR and all documents refer- enced were made available at the City's Community Development Depart- ment at 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950. The Draft EIR was also made available for review at the National City Library at 1401 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950, and in electronic format on the City's website at: http://www.ci.national-city.ca.us/index.aspx? page = 480. Copies of all written comments received on the Draft EIR are contained in this document. This Final EIR will be presented at a Planning Commission hearing at which the Commission will advise the City Council on certification of the EIR and its recommendation on approval or modification of the proposed General Plan. I Iowever, the Planning Commission will not take final action on the EIR or the proposed project. Instead, the City Council will consider the Planning Commission's recommendations on the Final EIR and the proposed Draft 2030 General Plan during a noticed public hearing, and make any final on the project. C. Document Organization This document is organized into the following chapters: • Chapter 1: Introduction. This chapter discusses the use and organization of this Final EIR. • Chapter 2: Report Summary. This chapter is a summary of the conclu- sions of the Draft and the Final EIR. It has been reprinted from the Draft EIR with necessary changes made in this Final FIR shown in un- derline and strikethrough. I-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR N T R O D U C T I O N • Chapter 3: Revisions to the Draft EIR. Corrections to the text and graphics of the Draft EIR are contained in this chapter. • Chapter 4: List of Commentors. Names of agencies and individuals who commented on the Draft E.IR are included in this chapter. • Chapter 5: Comments and Responses. This chapter contains reproduc- tions of the comment letters received from agencies and the public on the Draft EIR as well as written responses on environmental issues. The re- sponses arc keyed to the comments which precede them. I-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR I N T R O D L C T O N I-4 2 REPORT SUMMARY This is a summary of the Draft EIR Report Summary as modified by the Fi- nal EIR. This document has been reprinted from the Draft EIR with changes to Table 2-1. This summary presents an overview of the analysis contained in Chapter 4: Environmental Evaluation. CEQA requires that this chapter summarize the following: 1) areas of controversy and issues to be resolved, 2) significant impacts, 3) unavoidable significant impacts, 4) implementation of mitigation measures, and 5) alternatives to the project. A. Proposed Project Under Review The proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update project includes two pri- mary components: (1) revisions to the City's Planning documents, including a comprehensive update of National City's General Plan, an update to the Land Use Code (Municipal Code Title 18), and a Climate Action Plan, and amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan and Local Coastal Program to ensure consistency With the General Plan; and (2) five individual development projects as follows: Street Conversions/Community Corridors; Senior Village Expansion; i.as Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan; Kimball Park Master Plan; and El Toyon Park Master Plan. In the DEIR, discussion of the "Proposed Project," "General Plan and related planning documents," or refer- ences to "Regulatory Changes" in the DEIR typically refer to these planning documents and the implementing regulations (i.e. the Land Use Code). While the five development proposals arc included as part of the projected buildout of the Proposed Project, more specific information is also provided through- out the DEIR for the five development proposals; typically addressed in analyses labeled by the development proposals' name (e.g. Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan). The draft General Plan is intended to serve as the principal policy document for guiding future conservation and development in the City of National City. The draft General Plan includes goals, objectives and policies to im- plement the community's vision for National City. The policies and actions 2-1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPOR I SUMMARY would be used by the City to guide day-to-day decision -making so there would be continuing progress toward the attainment of the Plan's goals. The draft General Plan proposes land use designations to implement the overall goals and vision. The draft Land Use Code includes development standards and regulations to implement the goals, policies and land use designations contained in the General Plan. The development standards and regulations would be used by the City to guide day-to-day decision -making to ensure compliance with federal and State regulations and General Plan goals and policies for development. The CAP augments the objectives, goals, policies and actions of the General Plan related to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. Amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan and Local Coastal Program would ensure consistency with the General Plan. The Comprehen- sive Land Use Update is further detailed in Chapter 3 of the Draft EIR. B. Areas of Controversy & Issues to be Resolved The City issued a Notice of Preparation on May 3, 2010 and held a scoping meeting on May 11, 2010. The scoping period for this FIR was between May 3, 2010 and June 7, 2C10, during which interested agencies and the public could submit comments about the Comprehensive Land Use Update. The comments received focused primarily on the following issues: ♦ Implementing energy conservation measures. • Protecting the Paradise Creek corridor and all other wetlands and ripar- ian habitats. ♦ Protecting endangered species. ♦ Consideration of the Regional Transportation Plan and Regional Com- prehensive Plan. • Addressing traffic impacts in and around National City. • Effectively reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. • Meeting regulatory agency requirements or suggestions for the General Plan content or review. 2-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R F P O P, T S U M M A R All of these issues were addressed in the Comprehensive Land Use Update process. To the extent that these issues have environmental impacts, they are also addressed in this EIR. The decision to approve, approve with modifications (including mitigation measures), or deny the proposed project or one of the alternatives will be made by National City's decision makers after certification of the Final EIR. Additional discussion of mitigation measures and project alternatives is pro- vided below in Table 2-1 and Section F of this Chapter. C. Significant Impacts Under CEQA, a significant impact on the environment is defined as a sub- stantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical con- ditions within the area affected by the project, including land, air, water, min- erals, flora, fauna, ambient noise, and objects of historic and aesthetic signifi- cance. Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, in combination with long-term, region -wide growth and development, has the potential to generate environmental impacts in a number of areas. However, the Com- prehensive Land Use Update has been developed to be largely self -mitigating, and as a result, there are very few impacts that would occur solely on the ba- sis of its implementation. Nonetheless, the implementation and projected buildout of the Comprehen- sive Land Use Update has the potential to generate significant environmental impacts in the following areas: • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Hazards and Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use • Noise 2-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY • Transportation and Circulation • Utilities and Service Systems D. Mitigation Measures The Draft EIR suggests mitigation measures that would reduce most impacts to less -than -significant levels. These mitigation measures are .summarized in Table 2-1 at the end of this chapter. They will form the basis of a Mitigation Monitoring Program which will be published and adopted prior to approval of a project or alternative and implemented in accordance with State law. E. Unavoidable Significant Impacts Section 15126.2(6) of the CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR describe any significant impacts that cannot be avoided, even with the implementation of feasible mitigation measures. As described in Chapter 4 of the Draft EIR, and shown in Table 2-1, significant unavoidable impacts were identified in the areas of Air Quality, Hydrology and Water Quality, Transportation and Cir- culation, and Utilities and Service Systems. F. Alternatives to the Project This Draft EIR analyzes alternatives to the Comprehensive Land Use Update. There is no set methodology for comparing the alternatives or determining the environmentally superior alternative under CEQA. Identification of the environmentally superior alternative involves weighing and balancing all of the environmental resource areas by the City. Three alternatives to the Regu- latory Changes component of the Comprehensive Land Use Update are con- sidered and described in detail in Chapter 5 of the Draft EIR: • Existing General Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Distributed Growth Alternative • Centralized Growth Alternative 2-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR RFFORi SL MMAR.Y Additional alternatives to the Development Proposals component of the Comprehensive Land Use Update are considered and described in Chapter 5: • Existing Street Conversions/Community Corridors Alternative (No Pro- ject Alternative) • Reduced Street Conversions/Community Corridors Alternative • Existing Senior Village Expansion Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Reduced Senior Village Expansion Alternative • Existing Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Reduced Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Alternative • Existing Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative (No Project Alternative) • Reduced Kimball Park Master Plan Alternative • Existing El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative (No Project Alterna- tive) • Reduced El Toyon Park Master Plan Alternative As described in Chapter 5 of the Draft EIR, it is the City's primary concern to improve the health and safety of its residents, associated with Air Quality, Greenhouse Gases (GHGs), alternate modes of transit, and a jobs/housing balance. Further, the regional impacts to air pollution, potential conversion and loss of agricultural and biological resources, traffic congestion, and GHG would be substantially improved under the Comprehensive Land Use Update when compared with the Existing General Plan (No Project) and Distributed Growth Alternatives. Though impacts to local vehicular travel and level of service were reduced under the Distributed Growth Alternative, the Com- prehensive Land Use Update balances the increased impacts to vehicular travel with an improvement to regional air quality, provision of alternative modes of transportation, and GIIGs. Though impacts to regional air quality, provision of alternative modes of transportation, and GHGs would be further improved under the Centralized Growth Alternatives it would result in greater localized impacts not only to vehicular travel but local air quality and GHGs thereby impacting the health of its residents. Therefore, the environ- mentally superior alternative is the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Up- date project as it best balances regional and local impacts. 2-5 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT STPIMARY Further, while the Existing and Reduced Alternatives for each of the Devel- opment Proposals would significantly reduce or eliminate environmental im- pacts, as described in Chapter 5 of the Draft EIR associated with characteris- tics of the development proposal, it would fail to meet the as identified in Chapter 3 and listed in Chapter 5, Table 5-3 of the Draft EIR. G. Summary Table Table 2-1 presents a summary of impacts and mitigation measures identified in this report. It is organized to correspond with the environmental issues discussed in Chapter 4 of the Draft EIR. The table is arranged in four columns: 1) environmental impacts; 2) signifi- cance prior to mitigation; 3) mitigation measures; and 4) significance after mitigation. For a complete description of potential impacts, please refer to the specific discussions in Chapter 4 of the Draft EIR. 2-6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES Significant Impact AESTHETICS Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation Since there are no significant impacts related to aesthetics as a result of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, no mitigation measures are required. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES Since there arc no significant impacts related to agricultural resources as a result of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, no mitigation measures are required. AIR QUALITY AQ-1: Buildout of land uses under the proposed Regulatory S AQ-1: None available. Changes would result in a higher growth rate of vehicle trips and assumed vehicle miles traveled than population growth in the SDAPCD Clean Air Plan. This would conflict with regional planning efforts to attain ambient air quality standards. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that include updated General Plan and Land Use Code land use as- sumptions. Although clean air planning efforts (in terms of con- trol measures) can be adjusted to meet the plan objective and take into account the effects of the General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. SU S = Significant SU = Significan: and Unavo dahle PS = 'otentially Significant LTS = Less Than Sign':ficant, 2-7 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SLMMARY TAELF 2-I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact AQ-2: Construction activity during buildout of the proposed Regulatory Changes would generate exhaust and fugitive particu- late matter emissions that would affect local and regional air qual- ity. Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation S AQ-2a: Dust Suppression. The following enhanced dust control LTS measures shall be required by the City as part of the project entitle- ment process in order to control fugitive dust emissions during con- struction. These measures are in addition to SDAPCD regulatory requirements that are currently required for construction activity. • Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph. • Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to prevent silt runoff to public roadways. • Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possible. • Limit access to the construction sites, so tracking of mud or dirt on to public roadways can be prevented. If necessary, use wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off the tires or tracks of all trucks and equipment leaving the site. • Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instantane- ous gusts) exceed 20 mph or dust clouds cannot be prevented from extending beyond the site. AQ-2b: Exhaust Emission Controls. Projects that have significant construction period exhaust emissions shall reduce fleet average emis- sion rates. Developers or contractors shall provide a plan for ap- proval by the City or SDAPCD demonstrating that the heavy-duty (>50 horsepower) off -road vehicles to be used in the construction project for more than an accumulated 40 hours, including owned. leased and subcontractor vehicles, will achieve emission standards similar to in -use equipment that meets CARB certified Tier II stan- dards. S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significan- I_TS = Less Than Significant, 2-8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R CF' UR- SUMP' A TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact AQ-3: The higher intensity buildout of the Regulatory Changes would increase population and vehicle travel at a rate greater than anticipated in regional clean air planning efforts. This could con- flict with regional efforts to reduce unhealthy ozone and particu- late matter concentrations in the region. Future updates to the RAQS/SIP would use SANDAG projections that include updated General Plan and Land Use Code land use assumptions. Although clean air planning efforts (in terms of control measures) can be adjusted to meet the plan objective and take into account the ef- fects of the General Plan and Land Use Code land use assump- tions, these projections are not included in the current RAQS/SIP. AQ-4: As described above, in Impacts AQ-1 and AQ-3, the Regu- latory Changes and Development Proposals would result in a sig- nificant and unavoidable air quality impact. AQ-5: As described above, in Impacts AQ-1 and AQ-3, the Regu- latory Changes and Development Proposals would result in a cu- mulatively coruideruble contribution to a significant cumulative impact to regional air quality. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Significance Before Mitigation S AQ-3: None available. S S AQ-4: None available. AQ-5: None available. Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation SU SU SU BIO-1: Up to 1.2 acres of DCSS, located within the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, will be impacted as a result of site redevelopment. Because the DCSS area of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site supports habi- tat that is theoretically suitable for the federally -listed California Gnatcatcher, it may he necessary to obtain "take" authorization from the USFWS if this species is present on the project site. S BIO-1: In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.3, 3511, and 3513 of the Califor- nia Fish and Garne Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 3GG 520 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from February January 15'h to August 31' of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory California gnatcatcher. In order to determine presence/absence of California gnatcatchers, protocol surveys of suitable areas of habitat LTS 5 = Sign,flcant SU = S.groficant and Unavo dable PS = Potentially Significant LTS = Less Than Significant; 2-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY TABLE 2- I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact BIO-1 conrinnal BIO-2: Up to 1.2 acres of DCSS, located within the Las Palmas Paris and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, will be impacted as a result of site redevelopment. These areas will be impacted by renovations to the Butterfly Garden and the expansion of the ex- isting ICF Garden. Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures (DCSS) on -site are required. These must be completed by an ap- proved biologist in possession of a Section 10(a) Recovery Permit for this species. Should it he necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting survey of all areas within 300 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on - site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclu- sions and recommendations. Significance With Mitigation BIO-2: Impacts to DCSS shall require mitigation at a minimum 2:1 ratio. Therefore, impacts to 1.2 acres of DCSS will require 2.4 acres of mitigation. This mitigation could occur on -site, via habitat crea- tion and restoration in the Butterfly Garden and/or other areas of the site. In order for on -site habitat creation and restoration to he acceptable as DCSS mitigation, these activities would need to occur pursuant to a City and resource agencies (CDFG, USFWS) approved Revegetation Plan. The Revegetation Plan would be implemented by the City and would require a methodology for how to establish DCSS in that area. The Revegetation Plan would be required to comply with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within MX; 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from February January 15'h to August 31" of each year. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off --site, via the securement of 2.4 acre -credits of DCSS in an approved mitigation hank. If the DCSS is found to be occupied by California Gnatcatcher, a higher mitigation ratio would be required. S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significan: LTS = Less Than Sigrifcant 2-IO LTS CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REFOR- SUPIMAP." TABLE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact B10.3: Up to 0.8-acre of DFWW, located in the existing golf course in the center of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, will be impacted by creek restoration activities. Significance Before Mitigation BIO.4: Up to 0.1-acre of NVC, located in the middle of the exist- ing golf course on the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Con- cept Plan site, will be impacted by creek restoration activities. Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation S BIO-3: Impacts to the DFWW shall require mitigation at a mini- LTS mum 3:1 ratio in the following manner: at least 1:1 shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restora- tion/enhancement. For example, impacts to 0.8 acre of DFWW would require 2.4 acres of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via habitat creation and resto- ration activities in the on -site drainage. It should be noted that if these habitat restoration activities would result in any significant impacts, these impacts would be required to be analyzed and miti- gated. Significant impacts associated with habitat restoration activi- ties could include dredging in jurisdictional waters or wetlands, the removal of native vegetation, noise impacts to native wildlife during site preparation. In order for habitat restoration to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Such a plan would be implemented by the City and it would specify methodol- ogy for habitat creation and restoration. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securernent of 2.4 acre -credits of FWW in an approved mitigation bank. Regulatory Agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or offsite restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on - site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. S BIO-4 Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as Non -Vegetated Chan- LTS nel (NVC), generally require mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this typically must consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, im- pacts to 0.1-acre of NVC would require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Miti- gation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the on -site drainage. S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significan'- LTS = Less Than Sigrifcant, 2- I I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY TALE 2- I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact BIO-4 continued B10.5: 1 p to 0.1 acre of Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (DSCSM), within Paradise Creek in the southern portion of the Kimball Park Master Plan site, will be impacted as a result of creek improvements and grading and construction of a trail along Para- dise Creek. Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures In order for these activities to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to he subject to a City and Resource Agency - approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0.3 acre -credits of NVC in an approved mitigation hank. The Regulatory Agencies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or off -site restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on - site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Significance With Mitigation S BIO-5: Impacts to Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (DSCSM) I.TS require mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wedands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.1-acre of DSCSM shall require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for im- pacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via the restoration of Paradise Creek, including the daylighting of the portion of the creek that is currently underground. The project's current conceptual design shows approximately 3.9 acres as being available for Paradise Creek improvements. In order for these improvements to be accept- able as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alterna- tively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0.9 acre - credits of SCSM in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regu- latory Agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow appli- cants to propose either on- or offsite restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentiafy Significant LTS = Less Than Significant; 2-12 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R c' O F S U M M A R Y TABLE 2-I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact BIO-6: Up to 0.3-acre of Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (DFWW), within Paradise Creek on the Kimball Park Master Plan site, will be impacted as a result of creek improvements and grad- ing and construction of a trail along Paradise Creek. BIO.7: The Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan will impact jurisdictional wetlands and waters through the grading and landscaping of DFWW and NVC located within the existing golf course. Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation S BIO-6: Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as DFWW, require miti- LTS gation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wet- lands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restora- tion/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3-acre of DFWW shall require 0.9-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habi- tat -types could occur on -site. The project site has approximately 3.9 acres available for Paradise Creek improvements. In order for these improvements to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0.3 acre -credits of FWW in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or off -site restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, off -site mitigation within the same drain- age basin is required. S BIO-7: Because the proposed Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision LTS Concept Plan project will impact state wetlands and State and federal "waters," it may be necessary to obtain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project approval. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404,401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Altera- tion Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. S = S grifcant SU - Significant and Unavoidable PS = Significant LTS = Less Than SignfficanL 2- 13 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY TABLE 2- I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact BIO-8: The Kimball Park Master Plan will impact jurisdictional wetlands and waters through grading and bank improvements of DFWW and DSCSM along Paradise Creek, in the southeastern portion of the site. Significance Before Mitigation S Mitigation Measures B1O-8: (a) Mitigation for wetland impacts associated with improvements to Kimball Park will require a 1:1 ratio of wetlands creation and 2:1 ratio of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0,3 acre of DFWW would require 0.9 acre of mitigation and impacts to 0.1 acre of DSCSM would require 0.3 acre of mitigation. Mitiga- tion for impacts to these habitat -types could occur onsite, via the restoration of Paradise Creek or offsite through contribution to an approved mitigation hank. Because the proposed Kimball Park Master Plan project will impact State wetlands and State and federal "waters," it will likely he neces- sary to obtain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project implementation. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is riot required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the ap- plicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. (b) In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vege- tation within 360 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will nor be permitted during the spring/summer song bird breeding season, defined as from February January 15th to August 31st of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds. Significance With Mitigation LTS S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significant LTS = Less Than Significant; 2-14 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVELAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR TAB_E 2- I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) BIO-8 continued Significant Impact CULTURAL RESOURCES Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat - removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre - construction nesting survey of all areas within XQB 500 feet of the proposed activity- will be required, If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclu- sions and recommendations. Significance With Mitigation Since there are no significant impacts related to cultural resources as a result of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, no mitigation measures are required. GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND MINERAL RESOURCES Since there arc no significant impacts related to geology, soils, and mineral -resources as a result of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, no mitigatio HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS sures are required. HA'L-1: 'There are a number of sites in National City that are included on a list of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 6.5962.5 (Appendix E) or that need further investigation. Several of the sites have reported releases to the ground, resulting in soil and groundwater contamination, and are subject to various State and federal laws and regulators, including the CERCLA, US EPA, DTSC, and RWQCB. Rede- velopment of sites with existing soil or groundwater contamina- tion could potentially pose a significant hazard to the public or the environment through releases of hazardous materials into the environment. Although the risk of significant hazard to the public or the environment from redeveloptnent of sites with existing soil or groundwater contamination can be reduced by General Plan policies, it cannot be completely eliminated. HAZ-1: Implementation of a new General Plan Policy S-8.4 would require proposed development to determine the applicability of preparing a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP), stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan, (SUSWMP), Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP), stormwater Best Manage- ment Practices, and additional site -specific assessment including re- search, file reviews, and or Phase I Environmental Assessments. 5 = Significa-tt SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significant LTS = Less Than Significant: 2-15 LTS CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY TABLE 2- I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Significance Before Mitigation HYDRO-l: Buildout under the Regulatory Changes could potentially result in stormwater volume in excess of storm drainage system capacity. S Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation HYDRO-1: National City shall incorporate into its General Plan a LTS policy to regularly assess the adequacy of its storm sewer system to accommodate 100-year storm flows and develop and implement a prioritized plan to address identified capacity deficiencies to the MEP. HYDRO-2: As it is not possible to determine whether imple- mentation of stormwater management practices would be ade- quate to accommodate 100-year storm flows on the Senior Village Expansion project site, the placement of occupied development within a Special Flood Hazard Area could raise the base flood elevation or redirect flood flows, resulting in flooding and damage either on- or off -site. S HYDRO-2a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydrological study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surrounding area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to accommodate 100-year flood flows on site. Measures to accommodate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPS such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. HYDRO-2b: National City shall incorporate feasible measures iden- tified in the detailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. LTS HYDRO-3: The placement of commercial structures proposed as part of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan within a Special Flood Hazard Area could raise the base flood elevation or redirect flood flows, resulting in flooding and damage either on- or off -site. S HYDRO-3a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydrological LTS study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surrounding area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to accommodate 100-year flood flows on site. Measures to accommodate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPS such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. HYDRO-3b: National City shall incorporate feasible measures iden- tified in the detailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. S = Significant SU = Significan nd Unavoidable 'S = Potentially Significant LTS = Less Thar SigndcanC 2- 16 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R E P O R T S U M M A R Y TART_ F 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact LAND USE Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation LU-1: Potential impacts associated with conflicts with adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plan could occur as a result of the Regulatory Changes and Develop- menr Proposals. NOISE S The inclusion of policies to the General Plan related to development review would reduce impacts associated with conflicts with the MSCP in the vicinity of the Planning area. The addition of Policy OS-2.7 would ensure that potential impacts to biological resources are carefully evaluated prior to approval of development projects. The addition of Policy OS-2.8 would ensure that development is consistent with all federal, State and regional regulations for habitat and species protection. LTS NOI-1: Construction noise could adversely affect sensitive recep- tors adjacent to the Senior Village Expansion project, components of the Las Palmas Park Facilities Concept Plan, Kimball Park Mas- ter Plan, and El Toyon Park Master Plan. S NOI-1: Implement Construction Noise Reduction Measures. Title 12 LTS of the Municipal Code shall be amended to include the following standard construction noise reduction measures. • Equipment Sound Attenuation. All noise -producing construc- tion equipment and vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers, air -inlet silencers where appropri- ate, and any other shrouds, shields, or other noise -reducing fea- tures in good operating condition that meet or exceed original fac- tory specification. Mobile or fixed "package" equipment (e,g. arc welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readily available for that type of equip- ment. • Use of Electrical Equipment. Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion powered equipment, where feasible. • Distance from Sensitive Receptors. Material stockpiles and mo- bile equipment staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be lo- cated as far as practicable from noise -sensitive receptors. S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoicable PS = Potentially S gnificart LTS = Less Than Significant: 2-17 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY TALE 2-1 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact NOI-1 continued NOI-2: The proposed Regulatory Changes could result in the construction of sensitive land uses where- known vibration sources already exist and ground vibration from conventional railroad trains or light rail trains passing through the Planning Area could exceed the guidelines set forth by the PTA if new buildings hous- ing sensitive uses were constructed within approximately 1C0 feet of the tracks. Because vibration impacts from railroads are based on site -specific characteristics, it can nor be determined whether future development under the Regulatory Changes would result in significant impacts. Each site would need to be evaluated for geo- technical conditions and whether or not a potential for ground - borne vibration is likely to occur. If potential for groundborne vibration is found. mitigation measures would be required. Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures • Construction Traffic Speeds. Construction site and access road speed limits shall be established and enforced during the construc- tion period. ♦ Use of Noise -Producing Signals. The use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. • Use of Public Address or Music Systems. No project -related public address or music system shall be audible at any adjacent sen- sitive receptor. • Noise Complaint Process. The on -site construction supervisor shall have the responsibility and authority to receive and resolve noise complaints. A clear appeal process to the owner shall be es- tablished prior to construction commencement that will allow for resolution of noise problems that cannot be immediately solved by the site supervisor. NOI-2: Implementation of new General Plan Policy NN-1.10 would call for a study to demonstrate that ground borne vibration issues associated with rail operations arc adequately addressed for new de- velopment within 100 feet from the centerline of the railroad tracks. S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significant LTS = Less Than Significant; 2-18 Significance With Mitigation LTS CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R E P C R U "MAR Y TABLE 2- SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact NOI-3: Because vibration impacts are based on site -specific char- acteristics, it can not be determined whether future construction under the Regulatory Changes would result in significant impacts. Each site would need to be evaluated for geotechnical conditions and whether or not a potential for groundborne vibration is likely to occur. If potential for groundborne vibration is found, mitiga- tion measures would be required. Therefore, impacts related to groundborne vibration from construction under the Regulatory Changes would be significant before mitigation. Significance Before Mitigation S POPULATION AND HOUSING Mitigation Measures NOI-3: Detailed "Crack Survey." Prior to approval of final site de- sign, any project proponent that would propose driving pilings or performing an action that could cause substantial vibrations shall perform a detailed "crack survey" before the startup of construction activities. If pile driving would be the source of these vibrations, pre foundation pile holes should be pre -drilled to the extent feasible to minimize the number of hammer strikes required to seat the pile. The survey may be done by photographs, videotape, or visual inven- tory, and should include inside as well as outside locations. All exist- ing cracks and walls, floors, driveways, etc., should be documented with sufficient detail for comparison after construction to determine whether actual vibration damage has occurred. If damage is found, the project application would be required to compensate for such damages. Significance With Mitigation Since there are no sign f cant impacts related to population and housing as a result of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, no mitigation measures are required. PUBLIC SERVICES AND RECREATION LTS Since there are no significant impacts related to public services and recre on as a result of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, no mitigation measures are required. TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION TRANS-1: The standard established for Planning Area roadway level of service is i.OS D; however, modifications to the Planning Area roadway network proposed in the Regulatory Changes are projected to result in LOS E or F on 34 roadway segments in 2030 under buildout conditions. The impacted roadway segments and projected 2030 level of service are listed in Table 4.13-7. S TRANS-1: No feasible mitigation available. S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significant LTS = Lcss Than Significant; 2-19 SU CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REPORT SUMMARY TALE 2- I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact TRANS-2: By 2030, foreseeable growth in the San Diego region could result in substandard LOS on two roadway segments in jurisdictions adjacent to the Planning Area. Sweetwater Road from Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow Street in San Diego County is projected to operate at LOS F, while LOS on Broadway from State Route 54 to E Street in Chula Vista is projected to be substandard. Growth in the Planning Area would generate traffic volume which could contribute to the deterioration in the per- formance of these roadway segments. TRANS-3: Evert with implementation of RTP improvement actions and National City General Plan Policies, the addition of traffic expected from buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update and other reasonably foreseeable projects in San Diego County would cause six freeway segments on 1-5 and one segment on 1-805 that currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better to drop to unacceptable LOS E or F in 2030. These impacts are con- sidered significant. Additionally, with the addition of traffic ex- pected from implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update and other reasonably foreseeable projects in San Diego County, the volume to capacity ratio on one freeway segment on 1-5, five segments on I-805, and four segments on SR-54 that cur- rently operate at unacceptable LOS E or F would increase by more than 0.01 in 2030. The contribution of traffic associated with buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update to these cumula- tive impacts is considered significant. Significance Before Mitigation S Mitigation Measures TRANS-2: No mitigation required. As part of the County of San Diego's Draft General Plan Update, Sweetwater Road is plannc s r_ . lanein 2n3n hi_ a ace .c impacts to . I___ clan ignificant level in 2030. between National City city limits (Plaza Bonita Center Way) and Willow Street has been identified as a road- way segment where LOS E or F is acceptable, since adding travel lanes would result in adverse environmental impacts. As part of ongoing multi -jurisdictional programs such as Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) and Traffic Light Synchroni- zation Program (TSLP), the cities of National City and Chula Vista and Caltrans will continue to implement coordinated traffic signal timing along the National City Boulevard/Broadway Avenue corri- dor to improve traffic flow and progression. These implementation measures will ensure that impacts associated with increased conges- tion levels are /in than significant. S TRANS-3: No feasible mitigation available. S = Significant SU = Significa-t and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significant LTS = Less Than Significant 2-20 Significance With Mitigation LTS SU CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR P F P O R- SUMMAR Y TABLE 2-I SUMMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES (CONTINUED) Significant Impact UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Significance Before Mitigation Mitigation Measures Significance With Mitigation Impact UTII S-1: There is currently no feasible plan to expand landfill capacity to meet the projected needs of San Diego County beyond 2016. As implementation of the Regulatory Changes, the Senior Village Expansion Project, the Las Palmas Park and Facili- ties Vision Concept Plan, and the El Toyon Park Master Plan would generate additional solid waste requiring disposal in landfill after 2016 and compounding existing landfill constraints, the Regulatory Changes, the Senior Village Expansion Project, the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, and the El Toyon Park Master Plan would all contribute to a significant cumulative impact. S UTILS-1: None available. SU Impact UTILS-2: development and redevelopment under the Regulatory Changes, the Senior Village Expansion Project, the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, and the El Toyon Park Master Plan would result in the generation of more wastewater than accounted for in the 2010 SSMP, and conse- quently existing and projected capacity deficiencies in the sewer system could potentially he exacerbated with implementation of the Regulatory Changes. GREENIIOUSE GAS EMISSIONS S UTILS-2: The City of National City should conduct hydraulic modeling analysis to assess the impacts of the additional waste- water that would be generated with implementation of the Regulatory Changes and revise or re -prioritize the Recom- mended Capital Improvement Program contained in the SSMP as necessary in order to ensure that the City's wastewater collec- tion system would have sufficient capacity to accommodate growth in the planning area, including the Development Pro- posals, through 2030. Since there arc no significant impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions as a result of the Comprehensive Land Use Update, no r!ligation measures are required. LTS S = Significant SU = Significant and Unavoidable PS = Potentially Significant 1 TS = Less Than Signi icant: 2-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE DRAFT EIR REPORT SUMMARY -i2 3 REVISIONS FOR THE DRAFT EIR This chapter presents specific changes to the text of the Draft EIR that are being made in response to comments made by the public, by reviewing agen- cies, and by City staff. In each case, the revised page and location on the page is set forth, followed by the textual, tabular or graphical revision. New text is underlined and text removed is shown with strikeout. None of the changes constitute significant changes to the Draft EIR, so the Draft EIR does not need to be recirculated. Appendices listed on page ii, are revised as follows: Appendix F: Revised General Plan Update Circulation Element Technical Report Appendix M: Biolo ical Field Surveys The first paragraph under heading a) Non -Native Grassland (Holland Code 42200) — 9.3 Acres, on page 4.4-28, is revised as follows: NNG is also found in a patchy distribution along the western and eastern project site boundaries. This habitat -type is indicated by a thatch of non- native grasses and forbs, including Ripgut Brome (Bromus diandrus) and Per- ennial Mustard (Brassies geniculata). Some areas of NNG support scattered large shrubs and small trees, including Lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), European Olive (Oleo europa), Peruvian Peppertree (Schinus mope), and Toyon (Heteromeles arhutifolia). NNG qualifies as a sensitive vegetation community in southern California insofar as it supports raptor foraging and potential foraging by various special status species. The biological resource. value of NNC is I w. The second paragraph under heading a) Sensitive Vegetation Communi- ties, on pages 4.4-33 and 34, is revised as follows: The NNG CSS, DFWW, and NVC on the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project site are considered sensitive because impacts to these habitats arc regulated by the City pursuant to the California Environ- mental Quality Act and by various State and federal agencies as jurisdictional lands. CSS is depleted throughout its distribution and is a habitat for State 3-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONS FOR ]HE C R A F 1 EIR and federally listed rare and threatened species. DFWW and NVC are typi- cally considered jurisdictional wetlands and arc regulated by the USACE, the CDFG, and/or the RWQCB. In terms of biological resource values, the habitat quality of the NNG CSS, DFWW, and NVC areas within Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project site is limited by their small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation. The first paragraph under heading b) Non -Native Grassland (Holland Code 42200) — 0.7 Acre, on page 4.4-47, is revised as follows: NNG is found at the southeastern corner of the site, in areas supporting a dense thatch of naturalized non-native grasses and forbs. These areas ap- peared to be tilled annually, but are not maintained as lawns like the rest of the project site. The NNG is indicated by Ripgut Brome (Bromus diandrus), Wild Oat (Arena sp.), Bermuda Grass (Cynodon dactylon), Cheeseweed (MaIva parviflora), and Red -stem Stork's-bill (Erodiurn cicutarium). NNG qualifies as a sensitive vegetation community in southern California insofar as it supports raptor foraging and potential foraging by various special status species. The The second paragraph under heading a) Sensitive Vegetation Communi- ties, on pages 4.4-48 and 51, is revised as follows: The NNG, DSCSM and DPWW present on the project site are considered sensitive, in that impacts to these habitat -types would be regulated by the City pursuant to CEQA. DSCSM and DFWW would also be regulated and by the resource agencies as jurisdictional wetlands. Tn terms of biological re- source values, the habitat quality of the NNG, DSCSM and DFWW is lim- ited by their small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation. The first paragraph under heading b) Non -Native Grassland (Holland Code 42200) — 1.5 Acres, on page 4.4-60, is revised as follows: NNG is found in several patches along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site in areas supporting a dense thatch of naturalized non-native grasses and forbs. These areas may be tilled occasionally, but are not maintained as ?-) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR RLLSONS FOR THE DRAFT LIR lawns like other parts of the project site. The NNG is indicated by Ripgut Brome (Bromus diandrus), Wild Oat (Avena sp.), and other annual weeds. NNG qualifies as a sensitive vegetation community in southern California insofar as it supports raptor foracine and potential foraeine by various special status species. The bi logical resource value of NNC is I w. The first paragraph under heading d) Sensitive Vegetation Communities, on pages 4.4-62 and 64, is revised as follows: Vegetation communities (habitats) are generally considered "sensitive" if; (a) they are considered rare within the region by local agencies (b) they arc known to support special status animal or plant species; and/or (c) they are known to serve as important wildlife corridors. These sensitive habitats are typically depleted throughout their known ranges, or are highly localized and/or fragmented. None of the habitat- p the sidcred sensitive. The NNG, DSCSM, and DFWW present on the project site are considered sensitive insofar as such areas provide forage habitat for raptors. in terms of biological resource value, the habitat quality of the NNG is limited by its small size, de rce of disturbance, and isolation. The second paragraph on page 4.4-77 is revised as follows: Indirect impacts affect special status plants and/or animals residing on or near the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site. Due to the site's high amount of human use and the fact that it is completely surrounded by development, all of the natural/naturalized habitats on the project site are already subject to edge effects. In addition, due the high number of people usin the site on a daily basis. the biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of human activity. The last paragraph on page 4.4-78, continuing on page 4.4-79, and the second paragraph on page 4.4-79, are revised as follows: Indirect impacts affect sensitive habitats, plants, and/or animals residing on or near the Kimball Park Master Plan site. Due to the site's high amount of human use and the fact that it is completely surrounded by development, all 3-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R=VIS1 OIL S FOR THE DRAFT EIR of the natural/naturalized habitats on the project site are already subject to substantial edge effects. In addition, due the high number of people using the site on a daily basis the biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of human activity. Therefore, any indirect impacts on candi- date, sensitive, or special status species as identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or as defined under CEQA Guidelines Section 15380, resulting from the Kimball Park Master Plan would be Less than signifi- cant. a) El Toyon Park Master Plan Because the El Toyon Master Plan site does not support any areas of natural habitat, impacts on special status species resulting from implementation of the El Toyon Park Master Plan would not occur. In addition, due the high num- her of _people using the site on a daily basis, the biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of human activity. Therefore, the El Toyon Park Master Plan would have no impact, directly or indirectly, on candidate, sensitive, or special status species as identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or as defined under CEQA Guide- lines Section 15380. The first paragraph under heading iv. Mitigation Measure, on pages 4.4- 80 and 81, is revised as follows: Mitigation Measure BIO-1: In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 300 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, de- fined as from February January 15'h to August 31" of each year. I.imiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory California gnatcatcher. In order to determine pres- ence/absence of California gnatcatchers, protocol surveys of suitable areas of 3-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONS FOR THE DRAFT R habitat (DCSS) on -site are required. 'these must be completed by an ap- proved biologist in possession of a Section l0(a) Recovery Permit for this spe- cies. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat - removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting survey of all areas within 3GG 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of con- struction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be pro- vided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. The text under heading ii. Project -Level Impacts of the Development Proposals, on pages 4.4-83 through 86, is revised as follows: b) Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Measurable direct impacts on sensitive habitats will result from the develop- ment of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project site. The following direct impacts are anticipated: • Up to 9.3 acres of NNG, located along the western border of the project site and in patches along the eastern border of the project site, would be impacted as a result of site redevelopment. These areas will be impacted by grading for expanded community gardens adjacent to the existing ICF Garden, planting of citrus groves and other Landscaping treatments along the western border of the site, and construction activities related to the 122,000 square foot commercial development site in the southwest corner of the project site. How _ .ince—t-1 i.. .it :. e r_.n.ly cscl ped and the surrounding areas arc developed with urban uses, this impact would be lesthan significant. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. Though NNG supports potential raptor foraging and potential foraging by various special status s ep cies, the NNG on this site is already dis- turbed and is not known to be habitat for any special status species. No particular species have been identified on site. Suitable nesting habitat for raptors does not occur adjacent to the project site, or sufficiently close such that the area would be used more than occasionally as all surround- CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONSFOR THE DRAFT ER ing area is highly disturbed or developed. Therefore, this impact would be less than sigtifcant. No mitigation for this loss is required • Up to 1.2 acres of DCSS, located within the Butterfly Garden and the ICF Garden, will be impacted as a result of site redevelopment. These areas will he impacted by renovations to the Butterfly Garden and the expansion of the existing ICF Garden. The loss of this vegetation will be significant. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level that is "less than significant." • Up to 0.8-acre of DFWW, located in the existing golf course in the center of the project site, will be impacted by creek restoration activities. The loss of this vegetation will be significant. Mitigation for this loss is re- quired in order to reduce impacts to a level that is "less than significant." • Up to 0.1-acre of NVC, located in the middle of the existing golf course, will be impacted by creek restoration activities. The loss of this resource will be significant. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level that is "less than significant." Indirect impacts also affect sensitive habitats and special status plants and/or animals residing on or near the project site. Due to the site's high amount of human use and the fact that it is completely surrounded by development, all of the natural/naturalized habitats on the project site are already subject to edge effects. In addition, due to the high number of people using the site on a daily basis the biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of human activity. Therefore, any additional edge effects resulting from im- plementation of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan would be lets than significant. c) Kimball Park Master Plan Measurable direct impacts on sensitive habitats will result from the develop- ment of the Kimball Park project site. The following direct impacts are an- ticipated: • Up to 0.7 acre of NNG, located in the southern portion of the site adja- cent to Paradise Creek, will be lost as a result of development of commu- -6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONSFOR THE DRAT EIR nity gardens and creek improvements along Paradise Creels. Since thie area is currently developed and is surrounded by urban uses, this impact would be Icss than significant. No mitigation for this loss is required. Though NNG supports potential raptor foraging and potential foraging y various special status species, the NNG on this site is already dis- turbed and is not known to be habitat for any special status species. No particular species have been identified on site. Suitable nesting habitat for raptors does not occur adjacent to the project site, or sufficiently close such that the area would be used more than occasionally as all surround- ing area is highly disturbed or developed. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. No mitigation for this loss is required. ♦ Up to 0.8 acre of DH, along Paradise Creek and in patches along the southern border of the site, will be lost as a result of creek improvements and construction of community gardens. Since this habitat is currently disturbed by existing development, this impact would he less than signifi- cant. No mitigation for this loss is required. ♦ Up to 13.5 acres of U/D habitat could be lost as a result of site redevel- opment. Since this habitat is not sensitive and sensitive or special status species are not known to exist within the habitat, this impact would be less than significant. No mitigation for this loss is required. ♦ Up to 0.1 acre of DSCSM, within Paradise Creek in the southern portion of the site, will he impacted as a result of creek improvements and grad- ing and construction of a trail along Paradise Creek. The loss of this vegetation will be significant. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level that is less than significant. ♦ Up to 0.3 acre of DFWW, within Paradise Creek, will he impacted as a result of creek improvements and grading and construction of a trail along Paradise Creek. The loss of this vegetation will be significant. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level that is Less than significant. Indirect impacts also affect sensitive habitats and special status plants and/or animals residing on or near the project site. Due to the site's high amount of 3-7 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REV iSI ONS JCR. THE DRAFT EIR human use and the fact that it is completely surrounded by development, all of the natural/naturalized habitats on the project site are already subject to substantial edge effects. In addition, due to the high number of people using the site on a daily basis the biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of human activity. Therefore, any additional edge effects re- sulting from project implementation would be Less than significant. d) El Toyon Park Master Plan Measurable direct impacts on habitats would result from the development of the El Toyon Park project site. however, as stated in the existing conditions, the habitat types found within the project site have low biological value. The following direct impacts are anticipated: • Up to 13.3 acres of U/D habitat will be impacted as a result of sitc rede- velopment. Since this habitat is not sensitive and sensitive or special status species are not known to exist within the habitat, the loss of this habitat would be less than significant. No mitigation for this loss is re- quired. • Up to 1.5 acres of NNG, located between the existing baseball diamond and the southern and western borders of the project site, will be lost as a result of sitc redevelopment. Since this area is already disturbed-and-i-s not known to be habitat f r any special status species Though NNG supports potential raptor foraging and potential foraging by various spe- cial status species, the NNG on this site is already disturbed and is not known to be habitat for any special status species. No particular species have been identified on site. Suitable nesting habitat for raptors does not occur adjacent to the project site, or sufficiently close such that the area would be used more than occasionally as all surrounding area is highly disturbed or developed. Therefore, this impact would be less than signifi- cant. No mitigation for this loss is required. this impact would be less tbanslgnifieant. No mitigation for this loss is required. • Up to 2.7 acres of NNV, located throughout the project site, will be lost as a result of site redevelopment. Since these areas arc currently devel- 3-8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R,FV ISI O NS FOR THE DRAFT EIR oped with existing uscs, this impact would be less than significant. No mitigation for this loss is required. • Up to 2.8 acres of DH surrounding the baseball diamond will be lost as a result of site redevelopment. Since this area is currently disturbed by ex- isting development, this impact would be less than significant. No mitiga- tion for this loss is required. The text under heading iii. Impact Determination, on pages 4.4-86 and 87, is revised as follows: Indirect impacts also affect sensitive habitats and special status plants and/or animals residing on or near the project site. Due to the site's high amount of human use and the fact that it is completely surrounded by development, all of the natural/naturalized habitats on the project site are already subject to substantial edge effects. In addition, due to the high number of people using the site on a daily basis the biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of human activity. Therefore, any additional edge effects re- sulting from project implementation would he less than significant. The text under heading iv. Mitigation Measures, on pages 4.4-87 and 88, is revised as follows: Mitigation Measure BIO-2: Impacts to DCSS shall require mitigation at a minimum 2:1 ratio. Therefore, impacts to 1.2 acres of DCSS will re- quire 2.4 acres of mitigation. This mitigation could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration in the Butterfly Garden and/or other ar- eas of the site. In order for on -site habitat creation and restoration to be acceptable as DCSS mitigation, these activities would need to occur pur- suant to a City and resource agencies (CDFG, USFWS) approved Revegetation Plan. The Revegetation Plan would be implemented by the City and would require a methodology for how to establish DCSS in that area. The Revegetation Plan would he required to comply with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 300 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/ 3-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR RVONSFOR I F E DRAFI EIR summer songbird breeding season, defined as from February- January 15'h to August 31" of each year. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off --site, via the securement of 2.4 acre -credits of DCSS in an approved mitigation bank. If the DCSS is found to be occupied by California Gnatcatcher, a higher mitigation ra- tio would be required. Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant. With CDFG and USFWS approval of a Revegetation Plan Impact BIO-2 would be reduced to a less -than -significant level. The text under heading iv. Mitigation Measures, on pages 4.4-95 and 96, is revised as follows: Mitigation Measure BIO-8: (a) Mitigation for wetland impacts associated with improvements to Kimball Park will require a 1:1 ratio of wetlands creation and 2:1 ratio of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3 acre of DFWW would require 0.9 acre of mitigation and impacts to 0.1 acre of DSCSM would require 0.3 acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur onsite, via the restoration of Paradise Creek or offsite through contribution to an approved mitigation hank. Because the proposed Kimball Park Master Plan project will impact State wetlands and State and federal "waters," it will likely be necessary to ob- tain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project imple- mentation. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof pro- vided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. 3-I0 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONS FOR THE DRAFT ER (b) In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sec- tions 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 300 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, de- fined as from February January 15`h to August 31'` of each year. Limit- ing activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds. Should it be necessary to con- duct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting survey of all areas within 300 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction ac- tivities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. Significance after Mitigation: Less than significant. Mitigation Measure BIO-8(a) provides mitigation for jurisdictional waters and wetland im- pacts associated with improvements to Kimball Park Master plan project by requiring proof of compliance with federal and State Clean Water Act regulations, and would require some combination of 1:1 wetlands crea- tion, 2:1 wetlands restoration/enhancement, or contribution to an ap- proved mitigation bank for impacts to wetlands and jurisdictional wa- ters. Mitigation activities for impacts to jurisdictional waters and wet- lands could occur onsite through improvements to Paradise Creek, or offsite, with resource agency approval. This mitigation would reduce impacts to wetlands and jurisdictional waters to less than significant. With the proper regulatory agency permits and/or seasonal avoidance of the migratory bird breeding season as required under Mitigation Measure BIO-8 (b) impacts to migratory birds and special status birds would be reduced to less than significant. 3- I I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONS : O R THE DRAFT FIR The first paragraph under heading b. Multiple Species Conservation Pro- gram, on pages 4.9-2 and 4.9-3, is revised as follows: The Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) completed in 1998 is a conservation program to balance development and protection of valuable habitat in a 900-square mile area in southwestern San Diego. The MSCP is a joint program between the City of San Diego, the U.S. Department of the Interior, the California Resources Agency, and other environmental and de- velopment groups. The primary goal of the MSCP is to conserve endangered species habitat areas and areas of biological importance, while allowing prop- erty owners to develop other less important land without engaging in State and federal environmental permit processes. The primary mechanism with which the MSCP does this is the creation of a biological preserve. Local ju- risdictions will implement the MSCP through subarea plans. These subarea plans will serve as a multiple species Habitat Conservation Plan pursuant to Section 1C(a)(1)(B) of the federal Endangered Species Act and a Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) pursuant to the California NCCP Act of 1991 and the State Endangered Species Act.' The Biological Mitigation Ordinance (BMO) provides the regulatory basis for implementing the MSCP subarea plans. The BMO includes specific project design criteria, protective of biological resources that must be incorporated into each project in order for the project to conform to the respective MSCP subarea plan. There are also specific provisions that address the need to protect important populations of rare and endangered species. All development projects within the County of San Diego's MSCP Subarea Plan must be in conformance with the MSCP through the BMO. National City is not a participating agency in the MSCP. Therefore, development within National City city limits is not subject to the BMO nor is it required to demonstrate compliance with the MSCP. The Planning Area includes the unincorporated area of Lincoln Acres however, which is subject to the County of San Diego MSCP Subarea Plan and BMO. While there are no sensitive habitats occurring within Lincoln Acres, future development within the respective portion of the County of San Diego 'City of San Diego, 1998, Final Multiple Species Conservation Program, MSCP Plan. 3-I2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONS I O Z I H= DRAF I MSCP Subarea Plan would be required to comply with applicable project design criteria included in the BMO. The text of the third paragraph on page 4.13-1, is revised as follows: The Year 2030 Plus Project Conditions scenario analyzes how the City's transportation network would operate for projected buildout of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update. A focused "Southbay III Traffic Model" was developed for this project combining the SANDAL Series 11 Regional Transportation Model (reflecting regional growth) with additional land use and roadway network details provided for the Southbay cities of Chula Vista and Nati nal City and its sphere of influence. The proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update includes t SANDAG's "Southbav III" transportation model, which is a SANDAG Regional Series 11 subarea model containing the most current land use and transportation network data for both the City of National City and the City of Chula Vista, and surrounding spheres of influ- ence, was used to analyze Year 203C With and Without Project Conditions. The following five development proposals which are included as part of the projected buildout of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use U_pdate in addi- tion to the Regulatory Changes, are evaluated in this EIR, described below and in the project description (see Figures 3-6 through 3-27). The text under heading 1. Terminology and Standards, in the second paragraph on page 4.13-11, is revised as follows: • Collector: Collectors are intended to "collect" traffic from local road- ways and carry it to roadways higher in the street classification hierarchy. These roadways serve as intermediaries between arterials and local roads, providing direct access to parcels in both residential and non-residential areas. Collectors typically have one or two lanes of traffic in each direc- tion and can carry up to 20,000 vehicles on a daily basis. Collectors may serve as alternate routes to arterials for movement across the City. There are a total of 2827 collector roadways within National City. 3-13 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR REVISIONS - O R r H E DRAFT F I R. Text within Table 4.13-2, on page 4.13-14, is revised as follows: TART F 4. 13-2 NATIONAL CITY LEVEL OF SERVICE CLASSIFICATIONS Level of Service / Average Daily Traffic Volumes' Street Classification Lanes A B C D E F Arterial 6 0-20,000 20,001- 28,001- 40,001- 45,001- 50,001+ 28,000 40,000 45,000 40,000 Arterial 4 0-15,000 15,001- 21,001- 30,001- 35,001- 21,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 40,001 + Arterial 4 0-10,000 10,001- 14,001- 20,001- 25,001- 14,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 30,001 + Arterial 3 + 1 0-8,500 8,501- 12,001- 17,001- 21,001- 12,000 17,000 21,000 25,003 25,0301 + Collector 4 0-7,000 7,001- 10,001- 14,001- 17,001- 10,000 14,000 17,000 20,000 20,001 + Collector 2+1 0-5,000 5,001- 7,001- 10,001- 13,001- 7,000 10,000 13,000 15,000 15,0071 + Collector 2 0-4,003 4,001- 5,501- 7,501- 9,001- 5,500 7,500 9,000 10,000 10,001 + *Approximate recommended Average Daily Traffic based upon SANTEC Guidelines as amended by the City of National City. Figure 4.13-1, on page 4.13-16, is revised as follows: The following changes to Figure 4.13-1 are corrections to the figure only. The correct roadway classifications were used in the DEIR traffic analysis. Therefore the analysis is still valid. • Highland Avenue between Division Street and 8`t' Street is changed from a Collector to Arterial roadway. • A label for Plaza Bonita Center Way is added along the eastern boundary of the City. • Civic Center Drive is shown as a Collector between Tidelands Avenue and Cleveland Avenue. 3- 14 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE DRAFT EIR TP. ANSPO P AT I ,1 AN D C II A I ION SAN LEG NAL �....-. sSRJe �. �r• ers �,i•� `, I I • City of National City .• Freeways L � is a Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Roadway Classifications Arterial S A N D' i EGC collector \7LEGEND Base Lay NOT TO SCALE �ourcT Fehr &PCC .p TrIt or Con.A.Ilanl FIGLRC 4 3- EXISTING ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONS FOR THE DRARI E R • 18th Street is shown as a Collector between Wilson Avenue and Cleveland Avenue. • 32"s Street is shown as a Collector between Marina Way and Tidelands Avenue. The text under heading ii. East-West Roadways, on page 4.13-19, is re- vised as follows: • 22nd Street is a two-lane Collector extending from Wilson Avenue to National City Boulevard. The current average daily traffic volume is 2,400 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. The text under heading b. Designated Truck Haul Routes, on page 4.13- 38, is revised as follows: Secondary Truck Routes include the following roadways: • Roosevelt Avenue (8'h Street to Plaza Boulevard) • National City Boulevard (Plaza Boulevard to Mile of Cars Way) • Highland Ave (Plaza Boulevard to 30'h Street) • Plaza Boulevard (Roosevelt Avenue to Highland Avenue) • Civic Center Drive (Harbor Drive to National City Boulevard) Figure 4.13-8, on page 4.13-48, is revised as follows: The following changes to Figure 4.13-8 are corrections to the figure only. The correct roadway classifications were used in the DEIR traffic analysis. Therefore the analysis is still valid. • 18th Street between Wilson Avenue and Cleveland Avenue is shown as a Collector. • Hoover Avenue between 22r Street and Mile of Cars Way is changed from a Collector to a Street Conversion site. • West Avenue between 16`h Street and 18'h Street is changed from a Col- lector to a Street Conversion site. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE DRAFT EIR TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION • .,►._.� A' t LEGEND Base Layers City of National City ------ Freeways m-- Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Roadway Classifications Arterial Collector Street Closure N Nor I O SSAL- FIGJRE 4.13-8 MAJOR PLANNING AREA ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS (PROPOSED) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR RFVISIONS FOR THE DRAFT FIR Text within Table 4.13-10 on page 4.13-69, is revised as shown on the fol- lowing page: The text under heading iii. Project -Level Impacts of the Development Proposals, on pages 4.13-66 and 67, is revised as follows: ii. Project -Level Impacts of the Development Proposals Implementation of the Development Proposals would have a significant envi- ronmental impact if it would result in a conflict with the established standard for Level of service on roadways in the Planning Area. Impacts to Planning Area roadway segments resulting from implementation of the Development Proposals were evaluated as part of the 2030 plus project analysis in Section F.1.a.i of this Chapter, and the results are shown in Table 4.13-6 above. 'I heref re, pr jcct specific analysis for the Development Proposals is not pr vided here. H we er, for the purposes of clarification a brief summary of impacts identified for the Street Conversions/Community Corridors, Kim- ball Park Master Pan and El Toyon Park Master Plan is provided below. De- tailed project -specific analysis is included in Appendix 1' Appendices G and H for reference. • Project -specific traffic analysis for the Community Corridors determined that level of service on the 24 Planning Area roadway segments that are part of the proposed Community Corridor system is projected to fall to LOS E or F under the Year 2030 Plus Project Conditions scenario. These roadway segments were considered in the program -level impact analysis discussion above in Section F.1.a.i of this Chapter. • Project specific traffic analysis f r the Crove Street and Sweetwater Road intersection, a key intersection in the vicinity of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Site, determined that that intersection w uld operate at an acceptable LOS D in the AM peak peri d but at an unacceptable LOS F in the PM peak period. The Crow Street and Sweetwater Road intersection is located along a segment of Sweetwater Road identified as significantly impacted n Table 1.13 6 nd in the pr gram level impact analysis discussion above in Section F.1.a.i of thi, Chapter. 3-18 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R.LVIS ONS FOR E I- E 7 RA- I 61E TABLL 4.1 3- 10 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS - IMPACTS FROM BUILDOUT OF THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE ON ROADWAYS IN ADJACENT JURISDICTIONS (2030 PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS) Roadway Segment Carlsbad City of San Diego Year 2030 Plus Project Existing Conditions 4.1 in Significant ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS V/C Impact? Harbor Drive Wabash Blvd. to Division St. 26,300 0.66 C 30,700 0.77 C 0.11 No Main Street Wabash Blvd. to Division St. 14,300 0.36 A 22,900 0,57 C 0.21 No 43''h Street Logan Ave. to Division St. 16,700 0.42 B 19,200 3.48 B 0.06 No 47`h Street Logan Ave. to 1-805 11,300 0.75 D 20,400 C.68 D -0.7 No Euclid Avenue Logan Ave. to Cervantes Ave. 15,300 0.50 C 19,400 0.65 C 0.15 No Paradise Valley Road Munda Rd. to Woodman Sr, 20,000 0.50 B 21,600 0.54 C 0.04 No Chula Vista Broadway SR-54 to E Street 18,200 0.54 D or better 43,400 1.29 Sub- standard 0.75 Yes 4`h Avenue SR-54 to E Street 19,400 0.51 D or better 25,800 0.68 D or better 0.17 No Plaza Bonita Road Bonita Mesa Rd. to Bonita Rd. 11,100 3.30 A 11,700 0.31 A 0.01 No County of San Diego Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St. 15,600 0.82 E 21,300 1.12 F 0.30 Yes 3-19 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R F v I S I C N S F O R THE DRAFT E I R a) Senior Village Expansion The traffic analysis for the Senior Village Expansion project evaluated road- w y segment and intersection level or service under Cumulative Year 2030 Base Plus Project conditions to determine if project -level impacts would occur when compared to existing conditions. The analysis of roadway segments provided in Appendix G, found that the following three study area roadway segments would operate at acceptable LOS D under Existing Conditions and would operate at substandard LOS E under the Cumulative Year 2030 Base Plus Project conditions: • D Avenue from Plaza Boulevard to 12`h Street/Kimball Way (this impact was previously identified in DEIR Table 4.13-6 and 4.13-7, and page 4.13- 42 ♦ D Avenue from 12'h Street/Kimball Way to 15'h Street (this impact was previously identified in DEIR Table 4.13-6 and 4.13-7, and page 4.1349), and • D Avenue from 15'I' Street to 166 Street (this impact was previously iden- tified in DETR Table 4.13-6 and 4.13-7, and page 4.13-49). As noted on DEIR page 4.13-66, Table 4.13-6 included trip generation from this project component. These impacts were previously identified as signifi- cant and unavoidable in DEIR Table4.13-6 and 4.13-7, and page 4.13-49 ("D Avenue, between Plaza Boulevard and 16`h Street"). This information simply confirms and clarifies that the Senior Village expansion component of the Rroject would contribute to this impact. b) Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan The traffic analysis for the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Visions Concur Plant evaluated roadwaysegment and intersection level of service under Cu- mulative Year 2030 Base Plus Project conditions to determine if project -level impacts would occur when compared to existing conditions. The analysis of roadway segments, provided in Appendix H, found that the following two study area roadway segments would operate at substandard LOS F under the Cumulative Ycar 2030 Base Plus Project conditions: 3-20 CITY OF. NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR REV I <_IONS FOR THE DRAFT FIR • 18'h Street from L Avenue to Palm Avenue (this impact was previously identified in DEIR Tables 4.13-6 and 4.13-7, and page 4.13-61), and • 18'h Street from Newell Street to Euclid Avenue (this impact was previ- ously identified in DEIR Tables 4.13-6 and 4.13-7, and page 4.13-61). As noted on DEIR page 4.13-66, Table 4.13-6 included trip_generation from this project component. These impacts were previously identified as signifi- cant and unavoidable in DEIR Table 4.13-6 and 4.13-7, and page 4.13-60. This information simply confirms and clarifies that the Las Palmas Park Vision Concept Plan component of the project would contribute to this impact. The analysis of intersection level of service, also provided in Appendix H, found that all study area intersections currently operate at acceptable LQS D or better, except for the intersection of Grove Street/Sweetwater Road which operates at substandard LOS E during the PM peak hour. Under Cu- mulative Year 2030 Base Plus Project conditions. the intersection of Grove Street/Sweetwater Road would continue to operate at substandard level of service during the PM peak hour. This information simply confirms and clarifies that the Las Palmas Park Vision Concept Plan component of the pro- ject would contribute to this impact. The text in the second paragraph under heading iii. Impact Determina- tion, on page 4.13-67, is revised as follows: The City evaluated potential mitigation measures for these roadway segments as detailed in Table 4.13-7 and determined thcy would be infeasible. 24 out of the 34 significantly impacted roadway segments have been designated Com- munity Corridors. As described above and in the project description, the Community Corridors are intended to increase walking and bicycling through traffic calming measures, pedestrian enhancements, and bicycle im- provements. Potential mitigation measures would require the removal of these improvements, which would not accomplish the project objectives, nor the General Plan policies associated with promoting alternate modes of trans- portation, and would result in impacts to these other non -vehicular modes of 3-21 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REV ISI O N S 'OR I HE- URAF I E transit. For these reasons, mitigation at these intersection:roadway segments is considered infeasible. The text in the first paragraph on page 4.13-68 under heading iii. Impact Determination, is revised as follows: The remaining 10 roadway segments are currently built to the limits of the existing Right -Of -Way. To widen these roadways further, sidewalks would need to be removed or reduced in width, which would result in impacts to non -vehicular modes of transit (pedestrians and bicyclists). Recent revisions in planning and environmental law recognize the importance of planning for multiple modes of transportation, which provide for the needs of all users (including pedestrians, bicyclists, mass transit riders, and motorists (see AB 1358 [2008]; SB 375 [2008]). As such, these mitigation measures are also con- sidered infeasible due to policy considerations. Another option for roadway widening would involve the expansion of current Right -Of -Way through ad- ditional property acquisition. Property acquisitions, however, are considered environmentally, financially, and socially infeasible. I'ropetty acquisition would require demolition of existing buildings which would generate addi- tional environmental impacts associated with air quality, noise, GHGs, solid waste, and traffic as well as continuing to promote vehicular use. Further- more, widening of these roadway segments would also create a less pedestrian_ oriented environment and would thus create additional impacts to this alter- native mode of transportation. For these reasons, mitigation measures at these intersection,roadway segments are considered infeasible. Therefore, because no feasible mitigation exists, the impact atalong these 34 intersec tionsroadway segments remains significant and unavoidable. The text under heading iv. Mitigation Measures, is revised as follows: Mitigation Measure TRANS-1: No feasible mitigation available. Significance after Mitigation: Significant and Unavoidable Mitigation Measure TRANS-2: No mitigation required. As part of the County of San Diego's Draft General Plan Update, Sweetwater Road —is 3-22 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR REVISIONS FOR fl P[ ORA L T CIF planned as a four lane facility in 2030. This would reduce impacts to -a less than significant level in 2030. between National City city limits (Plaza Bonita Center Way) and Willow Street has been identified as a roadway se ment where LOSE or F is acceptable, since adding travel lanes would result in adverse environmental impacts.;' As part of ongoing multi -jurisdictional programs such as Regional Arte- rial Management System (RAMS) and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TSLP), the cities of National City and Chula Vista and Cal - trans will continue to implement coordinated traffic signal timing along the National City Boulevard/Broadway Avenue corridor to improve traffic flow and progression. These implementation measures will ensure that impacts associated with increased congestion levels are less than sig- nificant. Therefore, no additional mitigation measures would be required. The text in the third and fourth paragraphs under heading i. Program - Level Impacts of the Regulatory Changes, on pages 4.13-70, are revised as follows: Using ADT volumes obtained from Caltrans Freeway Performance Meas- urement System (PeMS) data and the SANDAG Series 11 South 111 traffic model, Fehr & Peers projected freeway performance for 17 CMTCMP road- way segments in the Planning Area in 2030. Modeling accounted for imple- mented and planned improvement actions from the 2030 RTP as well as growth under the Comprehensive Land Use Update. Details of modeling methodology and results can be found in Appendix F of this EIR. Under Caltrans Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies, a significant impact would occur when the addition of project traffic results in a drop in LOS from LOS D or better to substandard LOS E or F, or for freeway segments already op- erating at substandard LOS E or F, when v/c ratio increases by more than 0.01. Freeway performance modeling results are shown in Table 4.13-11 to- 2 County of San Diego, 2010, Draf General Plan, page M-A-75. 3-23 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR R-VISIONS FOR T-1E DRAFT EIR gether with data for existing conditions. The Freeway performance modeling results are for regular lanes only and do not consider either high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane performance or combined overall performance of the freeway segments studied. As such they represent worst case scenario condi- tions in 2030. As shown in Table 4.13-11, even with implementation of 2030 RTP im- provement actions, 16 CMTCMP roadway segments in the Planning Area would operate at unacceptable LOS E or F in 2030. Six freeway segments on Interstate 5 and one segment on Interstate 805 currently operate at acceptable LOS D or better; however, with the addition of traffic expected from imple- mentation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update and other reasonably foreseeable projects in San Diego County, LOS would drop to unacceptable LOS E or F for these segments in 2030. Implementation of the Comprehen- sive Land Use Update would therefore result in significant impacts on these CMTCMP roadway segments. Additionally, while one freeway segment on Interstate 5, five segments on I-805, and four segments on SR-54 currently operate at unacceptable LOS E or F, with the addition of traffic expected from implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update and other rea- sonably foreseeable projects in San Diego County, these segments would con- tinue to operate at unacceptable LOS and the change in v/c ratio on all ten segments would be greater than 0.01. Consequently, Implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update would result in a cumulatively considerable contribution to significant impacts on these CMTCMP roadway segments. Text in the title of Table 4.13-11 is revised as follows: TABLE 4.1 3-1 I CMPT ROADWAY PERFORMANCE — EXISTING CONDITIONS VS 2030 CLUU PLUS CUMULATIVE Text under d) Kimball Park Master Plan, on page 4.13-77, is revised as follows: The Kimball Park Master Plan would expand an existing park, creating new parking areas and new open space. Tin. pr jcEt w uld n t increase p pula the Plannin A_ea ,r generate a substantial increase in vehicle trips. 3-24 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR RFVISCNS FOR THF DRAFF FIR As such,the project —would have no impact on the regional CMP. Freeway performance modeling discussed above in Section F.l.h.i considered traffic that would be generated from development under the Regulatory Changes and the five Development Proposals, including the Kimball Park Master Plan. Associated impacts have therefore already been discussed above and for the sake of brevity that discussion is not repeated here. Key City Staff list on page 7-1, List of Preparers, is revised as follows: 1. Key City Staff Brad Raulston, Community Development Director Ray Pe, Principal Planner Stephen Manganiello, Traffic Engineer 3-25 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR REVISIONS FOR T H F ()RAF" R 3-26 4 LIST OF COMMENTORS A. Written Comments Written comments were received from the following: State Agencies 1. Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse, Governor's Office of Plan- ning and Research, March 15, 2011. 2. Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse, Governor's Office of Plan- ning and Research, March 15, 2011. 3. Edmund Pert, Regional Manager, South Coast Region, California De- partment of Fish and Game, March 14, 2011. 4. Jacob Armstrong, Development Review Branch Chief, California De- partment of Transportation, March 2, 2011. Regional and Local Agencies 5. Susan Baldwin, Senior Regional Planner, San Diego Association of Gov- ernments, March 3, 2011. 6. Stan Donn, Senior Planner, City of Chula Vista, March 9, 2011. Non -Profit Associations and Members of the Public 7. Marco Gonzalez, and Livia Borak, Attorneys for Environmental Health Coalition, March 10, 2011. 8. Georgette Gomez and Carolina Martinez, Environmental Health Coali- tion, March 10, 2011. 9. Geoffrey Schrolk, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 10. Mick Heard, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 11. Dennis Lexline, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 12. Leonor, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 4-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR _ I S T CI COMMINTORS 4-2 5 COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This chapter includes a reproduction of, and response to environmental issues in each letter received during the public review period (see CEQA Guidelines Sections 15088 and 15204(a)). Each letter is reproduced in its entirety, and is immediately followed by responses to the environmental issues in it. Letters follow the same order as listed in Chapter 4 of this Final EIR and are catego- rized by: • State Agencies • Regional and Local Agencies • Non -Profit Associations and Members of the Public Each comment and response is labeled with a reference number in the mar- gin. Where the same comment has been made more than once, a response may direct the reader to another numbered comment and response. Where a response required revisions to the Draft EIR, these revisions are shown in Chapter 3 of this Final EIR document. 5-1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COI". ME NT S AND RESFO NSE S This page mien i ovally left blank. 5-2 A. State Agencies CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C C M M E N T S AND RESPONSES 5-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5-4 MAR-21-2011 15:06 STATE CLEAR I NGHOUSE P.006/007 STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVEJNORS OFFICE ofPLANN1NG RESEARCH STATE cLWUNGHOUSE AND PLANNING NTrT i I JERRY BROWN Govriscrt March 15, 2011 Raymond Pe City of National City 1243 National City Tioulevard national City, CA 9 950 Subject: National City Comprehensive Land Use Update SCH#: zoloosioas Dear Raymond Pc: COMMENT LETTER #1 The State Clearinghouse submitted the libOVC named Drift FIR to selected state agelatics for review, Th review period closed on March 14, 2011, and no state agencies submitted comments by that date, This icter acknowledges that you have complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements far daft envirorin=tal docunWnts, plIs3uant to the Ci'nlifornia Environmental Quality Act. Please call the State Clearinghouse 4.'„" (916) 445-0613 if you have any questions regarding the environmental review process. If you have a question about the above -named project, please refer to the ten -digit State Clearinghouse number when contacting this office. Sinccrely, 1400 10th Street P,O, ax 3044 Sam/neat°, California 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 ZIAX (916) 325-3018 Witrol,opr.ca.gov MAR-21-2011 1B:06 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE Document Details Report State Clearinghouse Data Base SCH# 2010051005. Project Title Nation -at City Comprehensive Land Use Update. Load Agoncy National City P.007/007 Type MR raftER Description The proposed COMpkvh%,^nSivE, Land Use Update project includes two primary c.omponents: {1) ar, iffit-bnle of the Gener?.1 plan and Land tra.a Code (zoning node), a new Climato Action Flan, and amendments to the Downtown Specific ptan and Local Coastal Program; end (2) five individual development projects as folows: Street Conversions/Qommuni C.korridors; Senior Village Expansion; Lae Patmas-Park and Facilities Vison Concept Plan; Kimball pork Master Plan; and El Toyon Perk Master Plan. Lead Agency Contact Name Raymond Pe Agency City of National City Phone 619-3364421 Fax email Address 1243 National City Boulevard City National City State CA Zip 91950 Project Location county San Diego City National City Region Lot / Long Cross Streets Parcel No, Township Range Section Base Proximity to: Highway Airports Railways Waterways Schools Land Use Project Issues Aesthetic/Visual; Agricultural Land; Air Qtfality; Arehasologic-HIstorict Biological Resources: DrainagorACSOlption; Fiuud PlainiFleurlinG; Futes Land/Fife Hazard; Geologic/Seismic.; Minerals; Noise; Popviatiutt/Housiasj Balance; Pubc Seri:ices; Reoreaficn(ParkS; Scho-Q15AinivGrsitie6; SePtc SYs1cmi QUPCitr. U Er0Si011iCOMpantinn./Gradin9; Solid Waste; Toxlelf-azardca.iis; Traffic/Circulation; I/cc:elation; Water Quolity; Water Suppiy; WetiandiRinartant Gnaiwth inducing: Landuse; Cumulative. Etfocts; Other issues Reviewirg A genoes Rusuurces Agency; Department of Boatirid and Weterways; Ceiffurnta Coastal mrnissin; Department of Fish and Game, Region 5; Office of Historic Preservation; Department of Pak; and Recreation; Depatbriont of Water Resources; California Hiphwy Patrol; Caltrans, Dictrict 11; Regional Vtratrir Quality Control Board. Region 5; Department of Toxic Substances Control: Native Ant et ICLI!, Heriteco Commission Date Received 0°,127120i1 1 SCarterRevi'dtv 01/27/2011 End of Review 03(14/2011 Note: Flanks in date fields rosult from insulticterit inforrnation provided by ioad agency. TOTAL P .007 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR COMMENTS AND RESPCN SES Letter 1: Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse, Governor's Of- fice of Planning and Research, March 15, 2011. 1-1: This comment states that the DEIR was submitted to select State agen- cies for review, and acknowledges that the City has complied with the State Clearinghouse review requirements for environmental documents. No additional response is required (CEQA Guidelines Sections 15088(c) and 15204(a)). 5-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR COMMENTS AND RFSPONSFS This page intentionally left blank. 5-8 MAR-21-2011 1 :G5 STATE CLEARINGHOUSE F.002/007 STATE OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNOR'S OFFICE of PLANNING AND RESEARCH STATE CtEARxN"GHouSEA%ILa PLANNING UNIT NI -tired 3 5, '2011 Raymond. Pe City of Naticr„al 124 ; National City P '• atiounl City, CA 9 Subject': itiTu' ouJI City Corrt;rehenxive Ltcd Us- "Update CF? is 20 i 0051449 Dear :Raymond P. The enclosed con -anent (a) o: of the state review p iod, .v because they provide trap .loom -font. COMMENT LETTER #2 r Draft FIR teas (Were,' received by° the ilit, 2011.)Veare cw s tf>,at sitar l i be addressed in your firm i env ronrnental `i hz Califcrnra jg°e'!S'i}T11ne it.8. % trality Act does no requite Lead Agencaes to respond to late comments, ITow-e rer, we encotirage you t % iaicrsrg orae t1i^b. additional cotnmeuts it t s your fi:ui environmental zcuzr st and to conelder hem prior to ttking ika3 aet svn thi prtsposcd project. (914) 445330613 if yrtu?savo any qucztio-aa concerning the process. e a question regardinit e e abov non eel project please refer to it house nss xri ^ar (20100510039) when nilItt3cti roan Mate Clear knclvs'urs cc: Resources A Cr_:y 14% 10S1 Street P.O. ii (91.6) 44,5-0513 F4 (916) 323-3118 ti vhtopt.ca.gov 2-1 2-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O N M F N T S AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5-10 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M V t N I S AND RESPONSS Letter 2: Scott Morgan, Director, State Clearinghouse, Governor's Of- fice of Planning and Research, March 15, 2011. 2-1: This comment states that comments on the DE1R were received by the State Clearinghouse for the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) after the end of the review period. Responses to the CDFG letter have been provided in 3-1 through 3-8 below, although such re- sponses are not required under CEQA (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(a)). 2-2: This comment reiterates that CEQA does not require Lead Agencies to respond to late comments; however the City is encouraged to incorpo- rate the comments into the Final E1R. 'this comment was noted and no additional response is required. 5-II CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COM M EN S AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. F[SOVFCE$ AGf N_Y CALIFORNIA IYL� F111SCa1E State of California - The Natural Resources Agency Edmund G. Brown, Ir., Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME South Coast Region 4949 Viewridge Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 467-4201 www.dfq.ca.00v March 14, 2011 Mr. Ray Pe, Principal Planner City of National City Department of Community Development 1243 National City Boulevard San Diego, California 92101 John McCamman, Director COMMENT LETTER #3 Subject: Comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Report for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update, San Diego County, California (SCH No. 2010051009). Dear Mr. Pe: The California Department of Fish and Game (Department) has reviewed the above -referenced draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update, dated January 2011. The following statements and comments have been prepared pursuant to the Department's authority as Trustee Agency with jurisdiction over natural resources affected by the project (California Environmental Quality Act [CEQA] Guidelines §15386) and pursuant to our authority as a Responsible Agency under CEQA Guidelines Section 15381 over those aspects of the proposed project that come under the purview of the California Endangered Species Act (Fish and Game Code Section 2050 et seq.) and Fish and Game Code Section 1600 et seq. The Department also administers the Natural Community Conservation Planning Program (NCCP). The City of National City (City) has prepared a draft EIR to analyze the environmental impacts associated with the Comprehensive Land Use Update. The proposed project includes: 1) General Plan update, Land Use Code update (Municipal Code Title 18), and Climate Action Plan; 2) amendment to the Downtown Specific Plan and Local Coastal Program to ensure consistency with the update; and 3) five projects as follows: Street Conversions/Community Corridors; Senior Village Expansion; Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan; Kimball Park Master Plan; and El Toyon Park Master Plan (proposed project). These documents would supersede the current General Plan, which was last updated in 1996, and portions of the current Municipal Code. The proposed project is intended to provide the control and regulation necessary to ensure that growth occurs in an orderly fashion through the horizon year in 2030. We offer the following comments and recommendations to the assist the City in avoiding, minimizing, and adequately mitigating project -related impacts to biological resources, and to ensure that the project is consistent with ongoing regional habitat conservation planning efforts. 1. The DEIR cites the biological resource value of non-native grassland as low (page 4.4-60). However, we would highlight that non-native grassland (including ruderal habitat conditions) provides important foraging habitat for various species of raptors, even within urban settings (particularly for those urban parks discussed in the DEIR). Although the DEIR does not document raptors nesting onsite (based on the single site surveys) it does cite the potential for Cooper's hawk (Acciptercooperii) and Red -shouldered hawk (Buteo!ineatus) to occur in Conserving California's ZVil[ fe Since 1870 3-1 3-2 Mr. Ray Pe, Principal Planner March 14, 2011 Page 2of3 areas surrounding Las Palmas Park, El Toyon Park and Kimball Park. Also, the DEIR mentions raptor prey (i.e., California ground squirrel [Spermophilus beecheyij) along the western portion of El Toyon Park. Raptors nesting in suitable habitat adjacent to the project site could use each site for foraging to some extent; therefore we believe that the DEER should not readily discount the importance of this habitat type, even if these areas are affected by the surrounding urban development. As acknowledged within the City's General Plan Elements (Biological Resources subheading), the "Conservation and protection of important biological resources are integral to maintaining biodiversity and a healthy ecosystem. All species, no matter how small, have an important role to play in the ecosystem." Absent the supporting habitat for wildlife these goals cannot be achieved. We believe that consideration should be provided in the final EIR to either retain natural habitats within each park master plan proposal; otherwise all direct impacts to non-native grassland habitat should be mitigated accordingly (e.g., commensurate mitigation at 0.5:1 ratio). 2. The DEIR includes statements on pages 4.4-77, 4.4-78 and 4.4-84 that "biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of human activity". It is unclear to the Department as to the foundational support/quantitative evidence (CEQA Guideline §15064 (f)(5)) for this conclusion, therefore we request that additional discussion be provided in the final EIR for this determination. 3. The Department previously commented during the NOP phase of the EIR concerning the importance of establishing biological buffers and setbacks for the development proposal along the Paradise Creek corridor. The DEIR's analysis for the Kimball Park Master Plan site (as well as other park master plans) concludes that the project site is already subject to edge effects due to the surrounding urban development and that biological resources in these areas are highly tolerant of human activity, consequently indirect impacts would be less than significant. However, we would emphasize that in order to provide mitigation measures that adequately avoid and minimize both direct and indirect impacts, the City needs to establish sufficient buffers (particular in urban areas) for the protection of riparian habitat. Buffers are crucial as they provide foraging habitat for wildlife, reduce edge effects from noise, light, glare, line -of -sight disturbances, and inhibit invasive species encroachment. As a component of an integrated management system, buffers can also protect a watercourse by managing natural levels of nutrients and sediments. The final EIR should include design standards/conditions for affected park master plans that require establishing appropriate riparian buffers to creek corridors, canals and drainage ditches. Additionally, General Plan Policy OS-2.2 should specify the importance of requiring a biological buffer to riparian and wetland resources. An adequate buffer, as measured from the outside edge of the jurisdictional riparian habitat, should be established to protect the riparian habitats from edge effects. The Fish and Game Commission Policy on the Retention of Wetland Acreage and Habitat Values states, "Buffers should be of sufficient width and should be designed to eliminate potential disturbance of fish and wildlife resources from noise, human activity, feral animal intrusion, and any other potential sources of disturbance. The size and character of buffers shall ultimately be determined by the requirements of the affected species most sensitive to such disturbances. When feasible, buffers should be designed in a mariner which complements the habitat values associated with adjacent wetlands." The Department and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers suggests that buffers of 100 feet may be adequate to provide many of the functions cited above (and increased as needed depending upon the sensitivity of the biological resources). Additionally, the design standards/conditions should specifically include the following: 1) that trails should be located outside of defined riparian/wetland buffers; 2) that buffers should be 3-2 cont. 3-3 3-4 3-5 Mr. Ray Pe, Principal Planner March 14, 2011 Page 3 of 3 protected by a fencing designed to keep humans and domestic animals out of buffers; 3) the use of only native plants in the landscaped areas adjacent to the biological buffers; and, 4) artificial lighting associated with athletic fields/courts should be shielded and directed away from riparian and other environmentally sensitive lands. 4. To account for the earlier occurrences of raptor nesting activities that have been documented in San Diego, the Department suggests that the biological mitigation measures BIO-1, BIO- 2, and BIO-8, be revised to limit vegetation clearing, grading and/or construction activities from January 15`". If project construction is necessary during the avian breeding season and an active raptor nest is identified, a buffer of 500 feet should be established between the construction activities and the nest so that nesting activities are not interrupted. 5. The Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) discussion (4.9 Land Use) should be revised to clarify that the Biological Mitigation Ordinance is applicable only to the respective portion of the County of San Diego's MSCP Subarea Plan. In comparison, the implementation component for the City of San Diego's MSCP Subarea Plan defers to the Environmentally Sensitive Lands Regulations. Each entity's respective implementing agreements under the MSCP specify those conditions. 6. The DEIR biological resource discussion (Section 4.4) references the biological field survey were conducted for the Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site, Kimball Park Master Plan site and El Toyon Park Master Plan site by Vincent Scheidt, Certified Biological Consultant and Julia Groebner, Associate Biologist, on November 11, 2009, December 14, 2009, January 15, 2010, and March 2, 2010. The biological technical reports prepared in association with the survey activities were not included within the technical appendices for the DEIR's nor was there any discussion on the basis for standards that were applied to conducting the baseline biological analysis. In an effort to facilitate the public review and disclose the process, the survey reports should be provided in the technical appendices and copies provided to the Department. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the draft EIR and to assist the City in further minimizing and mitigating project impacts to biological resources. If you should have any additional questions or comments regarding this letter, please contact Paul Schlitt of the Department at (858) 637-5510. Sincerely, Edmund Pert Regional Manager South Coast Region cc: State Clearinghouse, Sacramento Paul Schlitt, DFG, San Diego 3-5 cont. 3-6 3-7 3-8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M M E N T S AND RFSPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5 16 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENIS AND RSPONSES Letter 3: Edmund Pert, Regional Manager, South Coast Region, Cali- fornia Department of Fish and Game, March 14, 2011. 3-1: This comment acknowledges that the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) has reviewed the DEIR and prepared statements, comments, and recommendations. No additional response is required. 3-2: This comment indicates that non-native grassland may provide important foraging habitat for various species of raptors, and that, because the urban park development proposal sites discussed in the DEIR include non-native grassland ("NNG"), they, may provide important forage habitat for raptor species with potential to occur in the vicinity. These comments provide con- text for the commenter's suggestion that "consideration should be provided in the final EIR to either retain natural habitats within each park master plan proposal..." or to mitigate direct impacts to NNG at a commensurate mitiga- tion ratio, such as C.5:1. This comment also quotes from the explanatory text ("Why is this important?") that follows Goal OS-2. The comment also rec- ommends mitigation for direct impacts to NNG at a ratio commensurate with impacts, for example, 0.5:1. Please note that the park development proposals would result in changes to existing parks/golf courses, as discussed on DEIR pages 3-69, 3-74, and 3-75; these parks generally experience a high amount of human use that discourages foraging activity by sensitive raptor species. 1'he discussion of how the park development proposals would affect these park areas is provided on pages 4.4- 83 through 4.4-86 of the DEIR (see p. 4.4-83 - 84 (Las Palmas Park), p.4.4-84- 85 (Kimball Park), and 4.4-85 - 86 (F.I Toyon Park)). Although the DEIR recognizes NNG as a sensitive vegetation community, as specified on page 4.4-15, insofar as it supports potential raptor foraging and potential foraging by various special status species, the biological resource value, as specified on page 4.4-60, was identified as low. Analysis in the DEIR supports a conclusion that the wide-ranging, special status raptor species that occur in the vicinity are not expected to occur on site at any of the parks (see 5-17 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR O M M E N- 5 AND RESPONF e.g. p. 4.4-40 (Las Palmas Park), p. 4.4-51 (Kimball Park), p. 4.4-65 (El Toyon Park)). However, in response to this comment, the FETR has been revised to clarify that NNG is considered a sensitive habitat community for the reasons discussed above. 3-3: This comment requests additional information to support the statement that "biological resources in the surrounding area are highly tolerant of hu- man activity". This comment has been noted and pages 4.4-77-4.4-79 and 4.44-84-86, of the FEIR have been revised to provide the requested discussion information. The additional text clarifies that each of the park development proposal sites already subject to high daily use. Please also note that each of the park development proposal sites are existing parks. These sites are also surrounded by an urban environment in nearly continuous use by residents and visitors. The Draft FIR presents an adequate description of baseline con- ditions relevant to the park development proposal sites, and the discussion is appropriate in that it provides sufficient information to analyze the signifi- cant impacts of the proposed park projects (see CEQA Guidelines j$ 15125(a), 15151). 3-4: This continent requests the City to establish adequate biological buffers on the Las Palmas, Kimball and El Toyon Park development proposal sites, for the protection of riparian habitat, specifically along Paradise Creek on the Kimball Park site. Please note that the drainage features, streams and associ- ated and adjacent vegetation at each of the park development proposal sites is currently highly disturbed and each of the park development proposals would seek to improve these areas in ways that would improve the habitat quality while also providing recreation and open space in an urban setting (see, e.g., DEIR, p. 4.4-44 (Las Palmas Park), p. 4.4-51 and 56 (Kimball Park), and p. 4.4- 65 (El Toyon Park)). In terms of biological resource value, the habitat quality of the areas within the park development proposal sites is limited by their small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation (see, e.g., DEIR, pp. 4.4-33 (Las Palmas Park), 4.4-45 (Kimball Park)). 5-18 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES The disturbed areas described above include vegetation communities which are only considered sensitive hecause impacts to these habitat types are regu- lated by state and federal agencies as jurisdictional lands (see, e.g., DEIR, p. 4.4-33). As noted in the DEIR on page 4.4-94, certain regulatory agency per- mits may be required as a condition of project approval and that the applicant must provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval, is proof provided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. At the time a detailed development plan is proposed by the applicant and in order to provide the required proof stated above, a jurisdictional wetland de- lineation will need to be conducted by a certified biologist. The jurisdictional delineation will he used to inform the final plan such that buffers will be pro- vided and impacts will be avoided to the maximum extent possible. The plan could contain landscape zones to transition from formal landscaped areas to more natural zones buffering the wetland. In addition, the plan could contain policies to avoid the use of pesticides, fertilizers and herbicides within speci- fied proximity of the wetland. The size and character of the buffers will be determined at that time, in consultation with the CDFG and the Army Corps of Engineers. Further, the Dr -aft EIR identified Mitigation Measures BIO-3 through BIO-6 to mitigate impacts to wetland habitats. All of these measures provide for offsite mitigation if onsite mitigation is not available. 3-5: This comment recommends including design standards/conditions for affected park master plans that require appropriate biological buffers for ri- parian habitat. Please refer to Response 3-4 above. The comment further recommends that General Plan Policy OS-2.2 be revised to specify the impor- tance of requiring a biological buffer. The City recognizes the importance of 3-19 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES protecting sensitive habitats including wetlands as demonstrated in Goal OS-2 and Policy OS-2.2. Policy OS-2.2 in the proposed General Plan has been revised to include fur- ther provisions to specify the importance of establishing biological buffers in future development: Policy OS-2.2: Preserve the ecological integrity of creek corridors, ca- nals, and drainage ditches that support riparian resources by preserving native plants and, t the extent feasible, removing invasive non-native plants.workin with California Department of Fish and Game to estab- lish a plant palette that is satisfactory and providing_for up to 10C-foot buffers that protect against development impacts but allow for existing uses and limited future recreational uses. The revised Policy OS-2.2 provides enhanced protection for riparian re- sources by working with CDFG to establish a satisfactory plant palette and by adding up 100-foot buffers to protect these resources. 3-6: This comment recommends revising mitigation measures BIO-1, BIO-2, and BIO-8 to limit disturbances to avian nesting and breeding. Pages 2-9, 2- 12-14, 4.4-80, 4.4-8C, and 4.4-96 have been revised to add the recommended language to mitigation measures BIO-1, BIO-2, and BIO-8. 3-7: This comment requests that the Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) discussion on page 4.9-3 of the Land Use Section be revised to clarify the appropriate application of the Biological Mitigation Ordinance. Page 4.9- 3 of the FEIR has heen revised. 3-8: This comment requests that the biological field surveys referenced in the DEIR be included in the Appendices. The referenced field surveys were provided via email to Paul Schlitt, Region 5 CEQA/CESA, South Coast Re- gion, CDFG on April 1, 2011 and have been incorporated as Appendix M of the FEIR. Dates and conditions under which the surveys were conducted are 5-20 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CO M LIEN TS AND RESPONSES described on p. 4.4-8 of the DEIR; Appendix M includes additional discussion of survey methods. 5-21 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M M E N I S A N U RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 3 22 STAFF OF CALIFORNIA—BUSINESS IRANSPORf4:[ON AND I!OUSING AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 11 PLANNING DIVISION 4050 TAYLOR STREET. M.S. 240 SAN DIEGO, CA 92110 PHONE (619) 688-6960 FAX (619) 688-4299 TTY 711 March 2, 2011 Mr. Raymond Pe, AICP Principal Planner City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 Dear Mr. Pe: 1-:3TMIINDG BROWN ir GOv rrnr 1-lex your power Be energy efficient! COMMENT LETTER #4 11-SD-5 National City Comprehensive Land Use Update DEIR SCH No. 2010051009 The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Proposed Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update SCH No. 2010051009, located in the City of National City (City) and adjacent to interstate 5 (1-5). Caltrans would like to submit the following coinments: • Mitigation Measure TRANS-3, Caltrans would expect that the feasibility of implementing cumulative impact mitigation along I-5 be thoroughly analyzed, and funded or implemented in a manner consistent with development approvals. Caltrans recommends an impact fee approach similar to the Chula Vista Western Traffic Development Impact Fee Program he considered as a potential strategy as part of this Comprehensive Land Use Update. • Mitigation Measure TRANS-2, any work performed within Caltrans right-of-way (R/W) will require discretionary review and approval by Caltrans and an encroachment permit will be required for any work within the Caltrans' RIW prior to construction. This includes any signal coordination with Caltrans ramp intersection signals. • Caltrans requests the City to provide the differences in land use assumptions, and 2035 traffic volumes, between the "Southbay III" model, and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) Regional Model series II or 12. • Please clarify if the Greenhouse Gas (CMG) inventory analysis relies on the modeling of "smart growth" land use forms to help achieve the cited 15% reduction by 2020. Caltrans recognizes that there is a strong link between transportation and land use. Development can have a significant impact on traffic and congestion on State transportation facilities. In particular, the pattern of land use can affect both total vehicle miles traveled and the number of trips per household. Caltrans encourages local agencies to work towards a safe, functional, interconnected, multi -modal system to help reduce congestion. 'Caltrans iur/rrores mohi/lryy ucrosc Caf fnrnia" I 4-1 4-2 4-3 4-4 4-5 Mr. Raymond Pe March 2.2011 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Anthony Aguirre, of the Development Review Branch, at (619) 688-3161. '(ACOB ARMSTRONG. Chief Development Review Branch c: Bill Figge, Deputy District Director, Planning Division, Caltrans Ron Saenz, Associate Transportation Planner, SANDAG ' ('altrans improves mobilifi across ( 'alii"omia" CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND R- S, O N S E S Letter 4: Jacob Armstrong, Development Review Branch Chief, Califor- nia Department of 'Transportation, March 2, 2011. 4-1: This comment acknowledges that the California Department of Trans- portation (Caltrans) has reviewed the DEIR and provides a list of comments. No additional response is required. 4-2: The DEIR identified Impact Trans-3 which results from traffic associated with "buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update and other reasonably foreseeable projects in San Diego County" (DEIR page 4.13-77 through 78). This comment recommends using an impact fee approach similar to the Chula Vista Western Traffic Development Impact Fee Program as a potential strategy for funding mitigation along I-5. The proposed General Plan already includes Policy C-1.6 which requires payment of a fee for transportation related improvements: Policy C-1.6: Exact fees on new development and redevelopment suffi- cient to cover the lair share portion of that development's impacts on the local and regional transportation system, including multi -modal facilities, and/or directly mitigate its impacts to the transportation system through construction of improvements. Furthermore, the City of National City currently participates in a regional Transportation Developer Impact Fee (TDIF) program, consistent with the San Diego Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP), for regional and interstate roadways. The TDIF is enacted as Chap- ter 4.52 of the National City Municipal Code available at: http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientld= 16516&stateld=5&stateN ame =California. Additionally, the DEIR notes that regional planning is ongoing for 1-5, which National City is participating in as a member of SANDAG (DEIR page 4.13- 78). National City does not have jurisdiction over 1-5 such that it could "im- 5-25 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES plement" such mitigation measures at this time. Instead, consistent with the programmatic nature of this MR, the City will continue to coordinate with Caltrans and SANDAG to identify funding opportunities for regional im- provements consistent with the RTP. The DEIR therefore concludes that the impact would remain significant and unavoidable because of the lack of a de- finitive roadway improvement at this time. 4-3: This comment states that any work within Caltrans right-of-way will require discretionary review and approval by Caltrans, including an en- croachment permit. This comment is accurate and has been noted. The City will coordinate with Caltrans and obtain encroachment permits as applicable for future work within Caltrans right-of-way. 4-4: This comment requests information regarding the differences in land use assumptions and 2035 traffic volumes, between the Southbay III model and the SANDAG Regional Model Series 11 or 12. The Southbay III model is a SANDAG Regional Series 11 subarea model with the most updated and accu- rate information for both thc City of National City and City of Chula Vista. Prior to choosing thc Southbay III subarea model for the DEIR analysis, Na- tional City (City) staff reviewed the SANDAG Series 11 Regional Model and found numerous inconsistencies in land uses (for example, the model underes- timated land uses and trip generation for the City's Harbor District located west of I-5) and the transportation roadway network (i.e. number of lanes and speeds, missing links). City staff concluded that the Series 11 Regional Model was inconsistent and outdated for the purpose of an accurate General Plan analysis. The Southbay 111 subarea model was created during the City of Chula Vista's General Plan Update (CPU) effort and has been utilized since that time for all of Chula Vista's development projects. 'therefore, it contains the most up- dated transportation network and land use information for Chula Vista. For this reason, and as recommended by SANDAG traffic modeling staff, the Southbay subarea model was selected as the base for National City's General Plan Update. City staff and the DE1R traffic consultant, Fehr & Peers, 5-26 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPO NSFS worked with SANDAG to update the Southbay Ill subarea model to include National City's transportation network and land use information to reflect both the City's currently adopted General Plan and proposed General Plan. Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) and zone connectors were adjusted to more accurately reflect land use patterns and traffic distribution onto the roadway network. Appendix F, General Plan Update Circulation Element Technical Report, has been revised to include the trip generation report for both the existing Gen- eral Plan and the proposed General Plan as an appendix (Appendix C to Ap- pendix F of the General Plan Update Circulation Element Technical Report). It shall be noted that SANDAG also incorporated all of the updates made to the land uses, transportation network, TAZs and zone connectors into their latest Series 12 Regional Model for consistency. The Series 12 Regional Model was not available at the time of the City's Comprehensive Land Use Update analysis. However, the updated Series 11 model (Southbay III) pro- vides an accurate analysis of the trip generation for the proposed project and the surrounding jurisdictions (see DEIR page 4.13-40 for description of the validation process). 4-5: This comment asks for clarification regarding whether the greenhouse gas inventory analysis relies on smart growth land use forms to help achieve the 15 percent reduction by 2020. Smart growth land use forms were in- cluded in the Climate Action Plan reduction measures, as stated on page 4.15- 35 of the DEIR. The comment further states that "Caltrans encourages local agencies to work towards a safe, functional, interconnected, multi -modal system to help reduce congestion." Numerous transportation related policies in the General Plan have been drafted to help promote alternative/multi-modal transit (see Poli- cics C-1.2, C-1.3, C-1.5, C-1.6, C-2.1, C-2.2, C-2.3, C-2.6, C-2.8, C-3.3, C-4.2, C-4.3, C-4.5, C-4.7, C-5.2, C-5.4, C-5.10, C-7.1 through C-7.7, C-8.1 through 8.8, and C-9.1 through C-9.6). Numerous additional policies and land use designations have also been included throughout the General Plan and Com- 5-2/ CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENT S 4 N D RESPONSES prehensive Land Use Update to help reduce vehicle miles traveled, including mixed use designations/zoning and increased densities. As discussed in the proposed General Plan: "National City's General Plan is designed to complement and support the RCP by basing its land use pattern on the smart growth principles outlined in the RCP. Under this General Plan, future growth including redevelopment, and infill will be directed into compact, mixed -use, and walkable areas that are connected to the regional transportation system. Higher density and in- tensity development will be focused around transit stops and major corridors that link residences to employment, shopping, health care, educational facili- ties, and recreational areas. This General Plan will result in increased per- sonal transportation options with priority given to the needs and safety of people traveling by foot, bicycle, and transit. Regional coordination will he a key to effectively guiding land use and transportation planning and invest- ment" (Proposed General Plan, page 2-2). 5-28 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMINTS AND RFSPONSES B. Regional and Local Agencies 5-29 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR OMMNFS AND 3 t S P O N S t 5 This page intentionally left blank. 5-30 SAIC....11.401Dw 401 a Street Suite 800 San Diego, C4 92101-4231 (619) 699-1900 Fax (619) 699-7905 www.sandag-org MEMBER AGENCIES Cities of Carlsbad Chula Vista Coronado Del Mar El Cajon Encinitas Escondido Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grote National City Oceanside Foway San Diego San Marcos Santee Solana Reach Vista and County of San Diego ADVSORY MEMBERS imperial County California Department of Transportation Metropolitan Transit System North County Transit District United States Depattment of Defense San Diego Unified Port District San Diego County Water Authority Southern California rribal Chairmen's Association Mexico COMMENT LETTER #5 March 3, 2011 File Number 3330301 Mr. Ray Pe Principal Planner 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Dear Mr. Pe: SUBJECT: Comments on Draft Environmental Impact Report (FIR) for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Draft ElR for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update. The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG's) comments are made from a regional perspective, emphasize the need for land use and transportation coordination, and are based on policies contained in the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) and the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). State law gives SANDAG the authority to determine whether a project or plan will need to be reviewed for regional significance. SANDAG staff has reviewed this project and determined that it is regionally significant due to the amount of traffic generated. After a thorough review, we are pleased to see that environmental review of this project includes consideration of applicable policy objectives contained in the RCP and the 2030 RTP. Specific Comments Smart Growth Opportunity Areas A key goal of the RCP is to focus growth in smart growth opportunity areas. The following are four Smart Growth Planning Area place types located within the City of National City: (1) the Town Center designation is located in the Downtown National City Harbor District, (2) the area of Plaza Boulevard from D Avenue to Euclid Avenue is designated Mixed -Use Transit Corridor, (3) the area of Highland Avenue from 8th Street continuing along Sweetwater Road to 30th Street is designated Mixed -Use Transit, and (4) the area at Paradise Valley Hospital Area at Euclid Avenue and 4th Street is designated Community Center. ft appears that the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update generally contributes to meeting and exceeding the density and intensity targets of the Smart Growth Planning Area place types. RECEIVED MAR U 8 2011 tweinizcarvoinitymfssta 5-1 5-2 The Smart Growth Concept Map will be updated later this year. At that time, SANDAG will work with all local jurisdictions to incorporate updated local land use inputs to reflect ongoing general and specific plan changes. We look forward to working with your staff on these updates. Housing The Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the next housing element cycle has been aligned with the San Diego region 2050 RTP, which is scheduled to be adopted in October 2011. The next RHNA will be completed by October 2011, and the deadline for completion of the next housing element revisions will be April 21, 2013, no later than 18 months after the 2050 RTP is adopted. General Comments Multimodal Transportation Analysis The 2030 RTP sets forth a multimodal approach to meeting the region's transportation needs. As such, we are pleased to see that the traffic analysis for the Comprehensive Land Use Update and the corresponding EIR strive to balance the needs of motorists, transit riders, pedestrians, and bicyclists, reflecting the Complete Streets requirements of Assembly Bill (AB) 1358, which took effect January 1, 2011. Please note that SANDAG is currently developing the 2050 RTP. Based on the General Plan Update's timeline, we request that you coordinate its further development with the 2050 RTP and Sustainable Communities Strategy efforts, in addition to the 2030 RTP. Also, the SANDAG Board of Directors has accepted a new Regional Growth Forecast that extends to 2050 for planning purposes that should be considered in additional refinements in this EIR. Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Please consider promoting alternatives to driving alone during peak periods, such as carpooling, vanpooling, bicycling, telecommuting, flexible work hours for employees, and the potential of a TDM plan as a part of this project to help mitigate regional transportation impacts. We recommend contacting the SANDAG 'Commute team to explore TDM options. Consult with Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and Ca!trans SANDAG advises the project applicant to consult with MTS, the transit service providers within the project area, and also with Caltrans to coordinate planned transit and/or highway improvements. Additionally, when analyzing future (2030) traffic conditions, SANDAG recommends using the transportation network included in the 2030 RTP Reasonably Expected funding scenario until the 2050 RTP is adopted (scheduled for this fall). Natural Environment A key RCP objective is to preserve and maintain natural areas in urban neighborhoods, such as canyons and creeks, and provide access for the enjoyment of the region's residents. Please consider this criteria if applicable to your project. 5-2 cont. 5-3 5-4 5-5 5-6 5-7 5-8 Other Considerations We are pleased that consideration has been given to AB 32, Senate Bill (SB) 375, SB 97, and Executive Order S-13-08, which call for analysis of greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, it is suggested that consideration be given to the policies included in the SANDAG Regional Energy Strategy that promote the reduction of energy demand and water consumption. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Draft EIR for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update. We encourage the City of National City, where appropriate, to evaluate the project based on the following SANDAG publications: (1) Designing for Smart Growth, Creating Great Places in the San Diego Region; (2) Planning and Designing for Pedestrians, Model Guidelines for the San Diego Region; (3) Trip Generation for Smart Growth; and (4) Parking Strategies for Smart Growth. These publications can be found on our Web site at www.sandag.org/igr. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this letter, please contact me at (619) 699-1943, or sba@sandag.org. Sincerely, SUSAN BALDWIN Senior Regional Planner SBA/RSA/mmo 3 5-9 5-10 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESFONSFS This page intentionally left blank. 5-34 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND P.S 5?ON S ES Letter 5: Susan Baldwin, Senior Regional Planner, San Diego Association of Governments, March 3, 2011. 5-1: This comment acknowledges that the San Diego Association of Gov- ernments (SANDAG) has reviewed the DEIR and provides comments from a regional perspective. It also recognizes that the DEIR considers the objectives of the Regional Comprehensive Plan (RCP) and 2030 Regional Transporta- tion Plan (RTP). No additional response is required. 5-2: This comment acknowledges that the Comprehensive Land Use Update contributes to meeting and exceeding the density and intensity targets of the SANDAG Smart Growth Planning Area place types. National City has al- ready worked with SANDAG to incorporate updated land use inputs for the Smart Growth Concept Map update. The DEIR also acknowledges SAN- DAG's designation of parts of National City as a Town Center and a Mixed Use Transit Corridor (see DEIR page 5-35). No additional response is re- quired. 5-3: This comment states that the Regional housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the next housing element cycle is aligned with the San Diego Region 205C RTP. The anticipated RTP adoption date and deadline for sub- sequent revisions to housing elements are provided. The DEIR notes these changes on page 3-10 and 3-11. No additional response is required. 5-4: This comment recognizes that the traffic analysis for the Comprehensive Land Use Update DEIR uses a multirnodal approach to transportation and reflects the Complete Streets requirements of AB 1358 [2008]. Please also see proposed General Plan page 3-74 for additional discussion of AB 1358 [2008]. No additional response is required. 5-5: This comment requests that the City coordinate further development of the Comprehensive Land Use Update with the SANDAG 2C50 RTP and Sus- tainable Communities Strategy efforts. It also recommends considering the 2050 Regional Growth Forecast in refinements in the FIR. The DEIR is 5-35 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES based on the SANDAG 2050 Regional Growth Forecast (see proposed Gen- eral Plan page 1-9, DEIR pages 3-43, 4.11-1 through 4.11-7, and DEIR Appen- dix A pages A-6 and A-9). No additional response is required. 5-6: This comment recommends promoting alternatives to driving alone dur- ing peak periods and a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan as part of the project, to help mitigate regional transportation impacts. The Circulation Element of the Draft General Plan already includes goals and policies that promote multimodal transportation options and alternatives to driving alone, including TDM strategies. Therefore, additional policies and programs are not required. For example the following policies directly ad- dress alternative modes of transit discussed in the comment letter: Policy C-4.1: Encourage businesses to provide flexible work schedules for employees. Policy C-4.2: Encourage employers to offer shared commute programs and/or incentives for employees to use transit. Policy C-4.4: Encourage carpooling and other shared commute pro- grams. Policy C-4.5: Encourage the use of alternative transportation modes. Policy C-4.6: Prioritize attention to transportation issues around schools to reduce school -related vehicle trips. Policy C-4.7: Seek opportunities to reduce vehicle trips before requiring physical roadway improvements. Policy C-8.4: Promote walking as the primary travel mode to schools. General Plan Implementation Measures: PO-5 (Website and Events), PT-10 (Commuter Benefits Program). 336 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR TOMNIFNTS AND RESPONSES Furthermore, inherent in the General Plan, are features designed to help re- duce personal vehicle use. As discussed in the proposed General Plan: "National City's General Plan is designed to complement and support the RCP by basing its land use pattern on the smart growth principles outlined in the RCP. Under this General Plan, redevelopment, infill, and new growth will be targeted into compact, mixed -use, and walkable areas that are connected to the regional transportation system. Higher density and intensity development will be focused around transit stops and major corridors that link residences to employment, shopping, health care, edu- cational facilities, and recreational areas. This General Plan will result in increased personal transportation options with priority given to the needs and safety of people traveling by foot, bicycle, and transit. Re- gional coordination will be a key to effectively guiding land use and transportation planning and investment" (Proposed General Plan page 2-2). Additional policies have been included in the proposed General Plan to pro- mote alternative modes of transit by ensuring support facilities are included in new development. Such policies include: Policy C-1.2: Require new development to provide and enhance connec- tivity to existing transportation facilities via the provision of key road- way connections, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities. Policy C-1.3: Require new development and redevelopment to provide good internal circulation facilities that meets the needs of walkers, bicy- clists, children, seniors, and persons with disabilities. Policy C-4.3: Require new uses to provide adequate bicycle parking and support facilities. D-37 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COVMENIS AND RFSFONSES Policy C-8.2: Require new development and redevelopment to incorpo- rate pedestrian -oriented street designs that provide a pleasant environ- ment for walking. Policy C-9.2: Require new development and redevelopment to provide safe, secure bicycle parking facilities. Policy C-9.3: Require new development and redevelopment to provide connections to existing and proposed bicycle routes, where appropriate. Policy C-9.4: Encourage existing businesses and new development or re- development projects to promote bicycling and provide bike rack facili- ties, personal lockers, and shower rooms. Additional policies have been included in the proposed Land Use Code changes. For example, pedestrian oriented zoning has been implemented (see mixed use zones MXC-1, MXC-2, MXD-1, and MXD-2). Additionally, Sec- tion 18.45.120 requires Bicycle Parking facilities with certain types of new development as well as shower facilities. In addition to the currently pro- posed Land Use Code revisions, additional changes will be made in the future to implement the General Plan (see DEIR page 3-13 for additional discussion of implementation of the General Plan). 5-7: This comment advises the City to consult with the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), other transit service providers, and Caltrans to coordinate planned transit and/or highway improvements. For the analysis of 2030 traf- fic conditions, SANDAG recommends using the transportation network in- cluded in the 203C RTP Reasonably Expected funding scenario until the 205C RTP is adopted. MTS and Caltrans were consulted during the preparation of the traffic analysis (General Plan Update Circulation Element Technical Re- port, Senior Village Expansion Project Traffic Impact Analysis, and Las Pal- mas Park Expansion Traffic Impact Study). The traffic analysis is based on the Southbay III model, as described in Response to Comment 4-4. Please also see Response to Comment 4-5 for discussion of highway improvement 5-38 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR ;.OMV FN TS AND RESPONSES coordination. Please also note that the proposed General Plan also contains policies and implementation measures for the City to work with Caltrans, SANDAG, and MTS on transportation improvements: Policy C-2.4: Work with Caltrans, SANDAG, MIS, and other responsi- ble agencies to identify, plan, and implement needed transportation im- provements. Policy C-3.3: Consult with MTS regarding updates to the BRT and local bus routes and related activities. General Plan Implementation Measures C-3 and C-6. 5-8: This comment suggests considering the RCP objective to preserve and maintain natural areas in urban neighborhoods, if applicable. This objective was considered in the development of the General Plan goals and policies. Please see the Open Space and the Conservation Elements of the General Plan for discussion of existing and proposed open space (see proposed General Plan pages 3-147 through 3-184, and 3-185 through 3-212; sec also DEIR Section 4.4 (Biological Resources), and Section 4.12 (Public Services & Recreation)). 5-9: This comment recognizes that the DE1R analyzes greenhouse gas emis- sions consistent with AB 32, SB 375, SB 97 and Executive Order S-13-08. It also suggests considering the policies included in the SANDAG Regional En- ergy Strategy that promote energy and water conservation. These policies were considered in the development of the General Plan and the Climate Ac- tion Plan reduction measures. Please also see DEIR Sections 4.14 and 4.15 for additional discussion of energy conservation measures and Sections 4.8 and 4.14 for discussion of existing and proposed water conservation measures. 5-10: This comment encourages the City to evaluate the project based on a selection of SANDAG publications. Many of the principles and concepts discussed in SANDAG's publications have been incorporated into the Pro- posed Project. 5-39 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESFO NS ES This page intentionally left blank. 5-'10 CHULA VISTA CRY OF Development Services Department March 9, 2011 Mr. Ray Pe National City Community Development Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 COMMENT LETTER #6 Subject: National City Comprehensive Land Use Update (GPU) Draft FIR (DEIR) Dear Ray: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the above referenced GPU and DEIR. The City of Chula Vista received the notice for the proposed project via your email on February 8, 2011. Please be advised that the Notice of Availability was not sent to the person identified in our NOP response letter as the contact person for this project. As a result we were not able to obtain the documents for review until February 15th. We immediately set up an orientation with you and your staff on February 16°i to get an overview of the proposed project, and appreciate your accommodation. It is our understanding that the project involves amendments to various policy -level documents (comprehensive General Plan update) including regulatory code (Downtown Specific Plan, I ,ocal Coastal Program, Land Use Code, and Climate Action Plan) updates. The EIR also examines 5 project proposals at a project level, and as we understand, no further CEQA review would be done for these projects. Considering the limited review time, our comments below represent a condensed review focused on Land Use and Traffic components of the DEIR as it relates to potential effects in Chula Vista. 1_,and Use 1. The DEIR does not clearly differentiate between the project (GPU) analyzed at a Program Level and the projects that are to be analyzed at the full project level as defined by CEQA section(s) 15168 and 15161. The document does not appear to contain the evaluation of required site specific operations and related environmental effects as consistent with the requirement of CEQA section 15168 (c) (4) and (5). The EIR should clearly identify how subsequent activities would be evaluated to ensure that they are within the scope of the project. The ,EIR should identify the how projects that exceed the assumptions of this program level document would be evaluated at a project level. 2. The GPU introduces 2 new Mixed Use Designations: Minor Mixed Use (48 du/ac max FAR 2.0) and Major Mixed Use (75 du/ac max FAR 3.5). These designations would be 6-1 6-2 1. 6-3 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 691-5101 j www.chulavistaca.gov National City Geral Plan Update DEIR Official Response March 9, 2011 Page 2 implemented with corresponding new mixed use zones: MXD-1 (48 du/ac max FAR 2.0) and MXD-2 (78 du/ac max FAR 3.5). The analyses appear to use a blended mid -rate (i.e. between 48 and 75 du/ac) rather than full build -out capacities. As stated above, the proposed General Plan densities would be implemented via the proposed Land Use Code that would allow this development without further discretionary review. The DEIR does not appear to analyze all potential development densities at a project level even though the Land Use Code would permit development at maximum densities by right. The full buildout capacity level needs to be evaluated in the EIR including the potential effects of the maximum density and full development that could be implemented through the Land Use Code (i.e. by right). The evaluation should include a Plan to Plan and a Plan to Ground analysis. The Plan to Plan analysis should evaluate the densities/capacities of the existing General Plan compared to the proposed General Plan. This analysis should determine the difference in the total number of additional dwelling units that would be permitted under the proposed General Plan and the impacts of the additional units must be analyzed in this document. The Plan to Ground analysis should evaluate the existing number of units on the ground today as compared to the remaining capacity in the proposed General Plan. The document should clearly identify what the density increase is from the proposed plan and what the impacts of the additional density are. The Major Mixed Use designation and corresponding MXD-2 zone is proposed for the Dixieline site. An MOU was recently adopted by both the City of Chula Vista and the City of National City that addresses the potential municipal boundary line adjustment between the two Cities. According to the proposed National City General Plan the Dixieline site could potentially he annexed into the City of Chula Vista. Regardless of annexation potential, the DEIR should analyze the potential impacts to adjacent Chula Vista facilities and infrastructure, including land use compatibility to the surrounding Chula Vista zoned Commercial and industrial lands, based on the ultimate densities and development that would be permitted within the MXD-2 zone. The facilities and infrastructure evaluation of the Dixieline site should utilize Chula Vista standards and thresholds in its evaluation. This is particularly important since we understand that any future Mixed -Use project would be permitted by right. 3. The Las Palmas Park Project proposes an additional 40,000 square feet of commercial. This could result in impacts to traffic, and other infrastructure and municipal services. The DEIR does not appear to disclose these potential impacts at the project level. At a minimum, the potential impacts should be considered and clearly analyzed at a project level. 4. According to Table 3-2 within the Project Description section of the DEIR, the GPU proposes a net increase of 5,091 dwelling units and a projected total 21,974 dwelling units at buildout. The footnote refers to Appendix A, "Buildout Assupmptions" as a source for lilrther explanation of this table. Appendix A explains that calculating "theoretical density is\Planning\Stant\Advance Manning Division\Conments\Jurisdictional\National City\NC GP1J HIR March 8, 2011Final doc 6-3 cont. 6-4 6-5 6-6 6-7 National City Geral Plan Update DEIR Official Response March 9, 2011 Page 3 yield" is based on the assumption that the maximum densities are rarely developed at 100%. Thus the assumptions would be 75% for residential uses within the Minor Mixed Use designation at a density of 48 duiac and 60% for the residential uses within the Major Mixed use designation at a density of 75 dulac. However, upon review of the narrative, it is unclear to the reader as how the 5091 dwelling units net increase and projected total 21,974 dwelling units were derived. The assumptions do not consider the scenario that the densities could be developed at 100% as allowed by the proposed Land Use Code by right, and would exceed the 60% and 75% "theoretical density yield". The Appendix A needs to include a comparative analysis of the "theoretical density yield" (60-75%) as well as the "maximum density yield" (i.e. 100%) in order to adequately assess the buildout dwelling units. Traffic The traffic analysis does not include/consider the potential for Traffic Oriented Design around the 1-805/Plaza Boulevard BRT station. The traffic analysis should include and address the potential impacts, from the potential Traffic Oriented Design at this location. 2. The DEIR does not provide adequate traffic data to support its analyses rather it directs the reader to Appendix II and G for project level traffic assumptions and methodology. The DEIR needs to provide a traffic analysis in the EIR that clearly substantiates the determination regarding the level of impact from the adoption of General Plan Update. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this Draft FIR and look forward to reviewing the final EIR. The City of Chula Vista requests notification prior to any and all scheduled public meetings, hearings, and workshops, and availability of draft documents related to the proposed project. Please send notices to Marilyn Ponseggi. If you have any questions regarding the above continents, please contact me at (619) 409-5953. We would he happy to meet with you to discuss these comments. Sincerely, / Stan Donn Senior Planner Cc: Gary halbert, Development Services Director/Deputy City Manager Ed Batchelder, Advance Planning Manager Marilyn Ponseggi, Principal Planner Toni Adler, Land Development Division Manager Dave Kaplan, Transportation Engineer JAPlanning\StanD\Advance Planning Division\Comments\Jurisdictional\National City1NC GPU EIR March 8, 2011Final_duc I I 6-7 cont. 6-8 6-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPON SFS This page intentionally left blank. 5-44 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR (7 M M F N- S AND RESPONSES Letter 6: Stan Donn, Senior Planner, City of Chula Vista, March 9, 2011. 6-1: This comment acknowledges that the City of Chula Vista has reviewed and commented on the DEIR. The comments focus on the Land Use and Traffic components of the DEIR as they relate to potential effects in Chula Vista. Please see DEIR Chapter 3 for a more detailed project description. 6-2: This comment states that the DEIR does not clearly differentiate be- tween the project analyzed at the program level and the projects analyzed at the project level. It also states that the DEIR does not contain the evaluation of site specific operations and related environmental effects consistent with CEQA section 15168 (c) (4) and (5). Under Section A of the DEIR, on page 2-1 of the Report Summary, there is -a clear description of the project being analyzed, including the program level analysis of the `Regulatory Changes" or "Program level Impact of the Regulatory Changes" and the project level analysis of the "Development Proposals" or "Project -Level Impact of the De- velopment Proposals." Further, the impact analysis for each resource section in Chapter 4 is similarly structured and delineated with separate headings un- der each threshold for the program level analysis of the "Regulatory Changes" and the project level analysis of the "Development Proposals". This com- ment also suggests that the DEIR should identify how subsequent activities and projects that exceed the assumptions of the program level document would be evaluated. All subsequent activities and projects not evaluated in the DEIR will follow the pertinent CEQA requirements. 6-3: For clarification, there are two General Plan mixed use designations ("Minor Mixed Use" and "Major Mixed Use"), and four mixed use zones: MXC-1 and MXD-1 (implementing the Minor Mixed Use designation), and MXC-2 and MXD-2 (implementing the Major Mixed Use designation). The proposed densities and intensities referenced in the comment are also incor- rect (i.e. MXD-2). The densities and intensities are as follows (with minor reductions in the zoning density and intensity, depending upon whether a single use is proposed): 5-45 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CCMMENTS AND RESPONSES. ♦ General Plan Designation - "Minor Mixed Use": FAR 2.0; 48 dwelling units per acre. • Land Use Code - MXC-1 Zone: FAR: min 1.0 max 2.0; max 48 dwelling units per acre (Land Use Code Table 18.24.040A). Land Use Code - MXD-1 Zone: FAR: min 1.0 max 2.0; max 48 dwelling units per acre (Land Use Code Table 18.24.040C). ♦ General Plan Designation - "Major Mixed Use": FAR 3.5; 75 dwelling units per acre. • Land Use Code - MXC-2 Zone: FAR: min 2.0 max 3.5; max 75 dwelling units per acre (Land Use Code Table 18.24.040B). • Land Use Code - MXD-2 Zone: FAR: min 2.0 max 3.5; max 75 dwelling units per acre (Land Use Code Table 18.24.040D). The comment states "The DEIR does not appear to analyze all potential de- velopment densities at a project level even though the Land Use Code would permit development at maximum densities by right. The full buildout capac- ity level needs to be evaluated in the EIR including the potential effects of maximum density and full development that could he implemented through the Land Use Code (i.e. by right)." The DEIR analyzes reasonably foreseeable growth at the horizon year, con- sistent with CEQA, consistent with General Plan Law (Government Code 65300 et seq.), and consistent with the methodology employed by other juris- dictions. Furthermore, numerous types of land uses would require a condi- tional use permit, and would not be allowed "by right." For example, see Table 18.24.050 in the proposed Land Use Code which requires conditional use permits for certain types of uses in the Mixed Use zones. Future discre- tionary actions will also trigger project specific review under CEQA. The DEIR Project Description describes the buildout methodology used in the analysis:' Similar methodology was employed by SANDAG in the 2050 Growth Fore- cast. As discussed therein, "The 2050 Regional Growth Forecast is developed through 546 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR COMMENTS ,4N D RESPONSES "As discussed in the Office of Planning and Research 2003 General Plan Guidelines, most jurisdictions select a 15 to 20 year planning horizon. This EIR evaluates the projected buildout of the Comprehensive Land Use Update in the 203C horizon year, consistent with CEQA require- ments that an EIR evaluate the "reasonably foreseeable" direct and indi- rect impacts of a proposed project (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15378 (a)). The level of development evaluated in this EIR is based upon reasonable assumptions for development activity anticipated to occur up to the 2030 horizon year. Actual development in any city or county is typically less than the theoretical limit of development. This is a result of market a multi -step, collaborative process involving input and review by a wide range of local, regional, and subject -area experts. The first step in the forecast process is to develop a region -wide growth projection of population, jobs, housing, and other demographic and economic characteristics. The region -wide projections are developed using the Demographic and Economic Forecasting Model (DEEM), which has had a 30-year track record of accurate region -wide projections. The DFFM input, assumptions, and results were reviewed twice by a panel of .subject -area experts, including representa- tives from local universities, economic and workforce development agencies, resource providers, public -sector partners, and key industries. The panel represented areas of expertise ranging from economic and demographic trends to housing and resource issues. The region -wide projections then become one input into the subregional, or neighborhood -level, forecast. The second key component of the subregional forecast is local land use data, developed through extensive collaboration with each of the 18 cities and the County of San Diego, as well as other land use agencies such as the tribal governments and Department of Defense. The local land use inputs incorporate such information as existing development, general plans, constraints to development (e.g. floodplains, steep slopes, habitat preserves, historic districts, building height restric- tions, and zoning), and permitted projects in the development pipeline. The final building blocks of the subregional forecast are proximity to existing job centers (along with travel time and commute choice information), and historical development pat- terns. These four key inputs influence the probability of a neighborhood's future growth. The results of this model were then reviewed by each jurisdiction's staff, and the final for cast was adjusted based on local feedback" (page 2, Available at h ttp: //ww°wsan da g. org/up l oads/p rojecti d/p rojectid_335_10794. pdf). 5-47 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CONMENIS AND NESFONSS forces, population growth (including birth rates and immigration), as well as building and zoning restrictions, availability of resources, and other federal, State, and local regulations. A detailed synopsis of the process to estimate projected 2030 buildout is provided in Appendix A and this section provides a brief overview. The projected 2030 buildout is based in part on the allowable uses and maximum densities and intensi- ties for each land use designation and zone in the planning area. This in- cludes assumptions about known potential development projects and the land use designations included in the General Plan land use map and zones included in the Land Use Code zoning map" (DEIR pages 3-41 through 3-42; see also DEIR Appendix A, "Buildout Assumptions"). As discussed in DEIR Appendix A: "It is unlikely that maximum theoretical buildout would ever occur, since it assumes that every parcel is developed at the maximum allowed den- sity. Actual development in any city or county is typically less than the theoretical limit of development. This maximum theoretical pattern of development would not be consistent with (1) the historical growth pat- terns in National City, (2) the current economic climate of the region, and (3) other limitations imposed by Federal, State and local regulations. Therefore, maximum theoretical buildout does not provide an accurate or appropriate estimate of the potential effects of the Comprehensive Land Use Update. The maximum theoretical buildout of 48,232 dwelling units represents a 148 percent increase from the 19,416 total dwelling units in the Planning Area in 2030 forecasted by the San Diego Associa- tion of Governments (SANDAG) based on building permit data and in- formation on future development trends" (DEIR Appendix A, pages A-1 and A-4 footnotes omitted). The approach used in the DEIR is also consistent with the CEQA Guidelines and CFQA case law. CEQA requires analysis of reasonably foreseeable im- pacts (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(d)). As a corollary to this rule, CEQA does not require analysis of impacts that are too remote or .specula- 5-48 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CC M MENT<_ AND RESPONSES tive. It is appropriate to discuss reasonably foreseeable growth at the horizon year of the proposed project; impacts beyond this time framc are highly speculative. The approach taken in the DEIR is consistent with OPR's 2003 General Plan Guidelines, which state that most jurisdictions select a 15 to 20 year planning horizon.' This approach is also consistent with recent CEQA case law. (Sec Save Round Valley Alliance v. County of Inyo (2007) 157 Ca1.App.4th 1437 [holding the DEIR did not need to assume second dwelling unit [theoretical buildout] would be constructed even though allowed by zon- ing.] See also Sondermann Ring Partners -Ventura Harbor v. City of San Buena Ventura 2008 WL 1822452 (Unpublished) ["Sondermann asserts the EIR does not comply with CEQA because it does not analyze impacts of full build -out under the updated general plan...The updated general plan analyzes growth potential over the 20-year life of the plan. [Ain EIR is not required to engage in speculation in order to analyze a `worst case scenario."'].) Similarly, an EIR is not required to assume a worst case scenario (i.e. maxi- mum theoretical buildout) and can rely upon reasonable assumptions. (To- wards Responsibility in Planning v. City Council (1988) 200 Ca1.App.3d 671; CEQA Guidelines Sections 15064 and 15358; City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School District (201C) 176 Ca1.App.4`I' 889; Environmental Council of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento (2006) 142 Ca1.App.4`h 1018 ["A public agency can make reasonable assumptions based on substantial evidence about future conditions without guaranteeing that those assumptions will remain true. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21080, subd. (e); City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Cal.App.3d 4C1, 412, 183 Ca1.Rptr. 898."]; sec similar NEPA requirements Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens Council (1989) 490 U.S. 332.) As noted in the DEIR discussion above, there are various other factors that would preclude maximum theoretical buildout from occurring. OPR's 2003 General Plan Guidelines page 14. Available at: http://www.opr.ca.gov/planning/publications/General PlanGuidclines_2003.pdf 5-49 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RFSPONSFS The approach taken in this DEIR is also consistent with other General Plan EIRs (see Sacramento General Plan EIR' and Santa Monica General Plan (LUCE) EIR).' Furthermore, if the City were to assume maximum theoreti- cal buildout (assuming 148 percent increase above projected growth) this could result in additional environmental impacts resulting from construction of any new mitigation measures/improvements for growth that is not ex- pected to materialize. The comment also states that the DEIR does not analyze impacts associated with the Land Use Code at a "project level." As discussed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15146(b) "An EIR on a project such as the adoption or amendment of a comprehensive zoning ordinance or a local general plan should focus on the secondary effects that can be expected to follow from the adoption, or amendment, bat the EIR need not be as detailed as an EIR on the Sacramento General Plan EIR "._assuming development would be at 80 per- cent of the maximum development potential associated with each land use designa- tion..." (pages page 5-11 and 6.0-1). Available at http://www.sacgp.org/master- eir/documents/Partl_GPMasterEl R.pdf. Santa Monica General Plan (LUCE) EIR: "Future year forecasts for the pro- posed LUCE identify a potential amount of change that would be anticipated under the proposed LUCE during the 20 year planning period. The forecasts incorporate the proposed LUCE strategies to conserve residential neighborhoods and direct inten- sive residential pressure into mixed -use transit -served corridors, to transform regional commercial to housing opportunities and encourage local -serving uses. These forecasts identify a potential future scenario based on reasonable assumptions and the best data available. Forecast estimates were checked against regional projections from the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) and the California Department of Finance (DOF)... An effective Floor Area Ratio (FAR) was determined for each district based on proposed LUCE standards, setback requirements, loading areas, and site design considera- tions as well as existing development trends for the districts. 'Phis effective FAR was then applied to the selected underutilized land area to conclude total development esti- mates... Total development for the commercial districts and the residential neighbor- hoods was then checked for consistency with growth projections estimated by the SCAG for the City of Santa Monica within the same study period." (page 3-16). Available at: http://www.shapethefuture2025.net/PIF/eir/luce_feir_f.pdf. 5-50 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CIOMMENS AND RESPONSES specific construction projects that alight follow." (Emphasis added.) As noted on DEIR page 3-1, the analysis is programmatic in nature for the General Plan and related regulatory changes. It would not be appropriate to provide additional project level analysis where specific projects have not yet been proposed. While population growth and the associated development under the horizon year of the General Plan and regulatory changes is reasonably foreseeable, development on any panicular parcel (except the five develop- ment proposals) is largely speculative (see Rio Vista Farm Bureau Center et al. v. County of Solano (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 351). 6-4: This comment requests both a Plan to Plan and a Plan to Ground analy- sis in the DEIR. Consistent with CEQA requirements, the impact analysis compares the proposed project to existing conditions (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a) and 15126.2(a)). This "Plan to Ground" impact analysis is provided in Sections 4.1 through 4.15 of the DEIR (see DEIR page 4-2 for a more detailed discussion of this methodology). The comment also requests a "Plan to Plan" analysis. Consistent with CEQA requirements, the DEIR also provides a comparison of the Proposed Project to the No Project Alternative in Chapter 5 ("Existing General Plan"). As discussed under CEQA Guide- lines Section 15126.6(e)(3)(A) "When the project is the revision of an existing land use or regulatory plan policy or ongoing operation, the 'no project' al- ternative will he the continuation of the existing plan, policy or operation into the future." Furthermore, Table 5-1 of the DEIR provides a comparison of huildout under the proposed project and the Existing General Plan. 6-5: This comment states that the DEIR should analyze the potential impact to adjacent Chula Vista facilities and infrastructure. The DEIR's impact analyses were not limited to the geographic borders of the City. As discussed on DEIR page 3-2 "The EIR, however, also includes an analysis of indirect impacts associated with the proposed project which may occur beyond the jurisdictional boundaries of National City. These are evaluated in the appli- cable individual resource sections." Similarly, the DEIR also notes "Individ- ual cumulative impacts may occur over different geographic areas. The cumu- lative discussions in Sections 4.1 through 4.15 explain the geographic scope of 5-51 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CO `1M FN'1S AND F. SPOIL S FS the area affected by each cumulative effect" (DEIR page 4-3). The comment does not provide information on any impacts that have not already been ad- dressed in the DEIR. This comment also calls for the use of City of Chula Vista's standards and thresholds in the evaluation of the Dixieline site. While the City considered the City of Chula Vista's thresholds to ensure compatibility, because the Dix- ieline site is located within the National City city limit and the City of Na- tional City is the lead agency,5 the ElR evaluated impacts under the thresh- olds the City believed to be appropriate for the proposed project. (Please also see Response to Comment 7-9.) In some instances this included Chula Vista's thresholds.' Furthermore, the comment does not state how Chula Vista's thresholds differ nor does it describe how this would have any substantive effect on the significance conclusions. Further, as noted on page 4.9-55 of the DEIR, Policy LU-3.1 demonstrates that the City will work with neighboring jurisdictions in planning contiguous areas in order to ensure compatible land uses. Please also see Response to Comment 6-3. 6-6: This comment requests that the 40,00C square feet of commercial space on the Las Palmas Park development proposal site be analyzed for impacts to traffic and other infrastructure. The Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision The lead agency has discretion to set its own significance criteria. "The de- termination of whether a project may have a significant effect on the environment calls for careful judgment on the part of the public agency involved, based to the ex- tent possible on scientific and factual data. An iron clad definition of significant effect is not always possible because the significance of an activity may vary with the setting" (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(b)). Therefore, "a lead agency has the discretion to determine whether to classify an impact described in an EIR as `significant,' depending on the nature of the area affected" (Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of Oceanside (2004) 119 Ca1.App.4th 477). 6 As further discussed on DEIR page 4.13-62, "Potential impacts were assessed using the applicable significance criteria from the jurisdiction in question...The City of Chula Vista considers LOS C in non -Urban Core areas and LOS D in Urban Core areas to be the acceptable standards for Circulation Element roadway segments." 552 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPOI.S ES Concept Plan, including the 40,000 square feet of commercial space, was ana- lyzed throughout the DEIR. As discussed in the DEIR Project Description: "In the DEIR, discussion of the "Proposed Project," "General Plan and related planning documents," or references to "Regulatory Changes" in the DEIR typically refer to these planning documents and the imple- menting regulations (i.e. the Land Use Code). While the five develop- ment proposals are included as part of the projected buildout of the Pro- posed Project, more specific information is also provided throughout the DEIR for the five development proposals; typically addressed in analyses labeled by the development proposals' name (e.g. Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan) (see Project Description Section 11.)" (DEIR page 3-10). Please also see Response to Comment 6-2. Furthermore, the commercial de- velopment proposed in Las Palmas Park was included in the traffic impact analysis for the "Regulatory Changes." The Regulatory Changes impact analysis relied upon the "Year 2030 Plus Project Conditions" (see DEIR Table 4.13-6). This scenario is described in the DEIR as including "...trip generation from (1) existing conditions, (2) projected growth under the Regulatory Changes, (3) the five Development Proposals..." (DEIR page 4.13-45). As fur- ther discussed in the DEIR: "Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan - This expansion proposal would generate additional traffic resulting from the proposed commercial space and thus a detailed traffic impact analysis was prepared to identify all potential impacts. Las Palmas Park is a 20-acre park lo- cated directly west of Interstate SC5 that extends from E. 18th Street to the north to Sweetwater Road to the south. Access to the park is via two driveways, one from 20th Street and the other from E. 22nd Street, each with a one-way stop controlled intersection. Access to the commercial portion of the Project site would be via Grove Street to/from Sweetwater Road." (DEIR page 4.13-5.) 5-53 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMM'HN S AND CESPONS ES This approach taken in the DEIR is consistent with analyzing the impacts of the "whole of an action" (i.e. all components of the proposed project includ- ing the Regulatory Changes and the Five Development Proposals) (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15378(c)). As noted on DEIR page 4.13-66 "Impacts to Planning Area roadway segments resulting from implementation of the De- velopment Proposals were evaluated as part of the 2030 plus project analysis in Section F.1.a.i of this Chapter, and the results are shown in Table 4.13-6 above." A project level 'traffic Impact Study (TIS) was prepared specifically for the Las Palmas Park Expansion project (Appendix H) and 40,000 sq. ft. of commercial space was assumed in this TIS. The trip generation rate was ob- tained from the SANDAG "(Not So) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Gen- eration Rates for the San Diego Region", which is used throughout of the region. The potential traffic impacts resulting from the proposed Las Palmas Park expansion were identified based on 40,00C sq. ft. of commercial, there- fore all traffic related impacts are adequately disclosed in the TIS. While not required under CLQA, more detailed component specific analysis of the Las Palmas Park traffic was provided in Appendix H of the DEIR. This informa- tion was summarized on DEIR page 4.13-66: "Project -specific traffic analysis for the Grove Street and Sweetwater Road intersection, a key intersection in the vicinity of the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Site, determined that that inter- section would operate at an acceptable LOS D in the AM peak period but at an unacceptable LOS F in the PM peak period. The Grove Street and Sweetwater Road intersection is located along a segment of Sweetwater Road identified as significantly impacted on Table 4.13-6 and in the pro- gram- level impact analysis discussion above in Section F.1.a.i of this Chapter." As discussed on page 4.13-68, this impact is mitigated to less than significant: "As part of the County of San Diego's General Plan Update, Sweetwater Road is planned as a four -lane facility in 2030. This would reduce im- pacts to a less -than -significant level in 2030. 5-.54 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M M E N T S AND RESPONSES As part of ongoing multi -jurisdictional programs such as Regional Arte- rial Management System (RAMS) and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TSLP), the cities of National City and Chula Vista and Cal - trans will continue to implement coordinated traffic signal timing along the National City Boulevard/Broadway Avenue corridor to improve traffic flow and progression. These implementation measures will ensure that impacts associated with increased congestion levels are less than sig- nificant" (see also DEIR Appendix H, Table 5.4, showing a LOS B after mitigation). The comment also expresses general concerns about infrastructure, and is therefore directed to DEIR Section 4.14 for discussion of infrastructure. However, without more specific concerns (i.e. sewer infrastructure, water supply infrastructure, etc...) it is not possible to provide a more detailed refer- ence to the analyses in the DEMR. 6-7: This comment requests further information regarding how the 5,091 net increase in dwelling units was derived. It states that Appendix A should in- clude both the "theoretical density yield" and "maximum density yield". As described in the response to comment 6-3, the "maximum density yield" is not reasonably foreseeable and therefore not consistent with Section 15064(d) of the CEQA Guidelines. Paragraph two on page A-6 of Appendix A clearly describes the assumptions used to calculate the 5,091 net new dwelling units. As further discussed in Response 6-3 "[al public agency can make reasonable assumptions based on substantial evidence about future conditions without guaranteeing that those assumptions will remain true. (Pub. Resources Code, 21080, subd. (e); City of Del Mar v. City of San Diego (1982) 133 Ca1.App.3d 401, 412, 183 Cal.Rptr. 898." (Environmental Council of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento (2006) 142 Cal.App.4'h 1018.) As further noted under Response to Comment 6-3, such theoretical development would constitute a 148 percent increase above growth projections and is therefore highly speculative and un- realistic. 5-55 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR COM1ENTS AND RESPONSES 6-8: This comment calls for the consideration of the potential for "Traffic Oriented Design" around the I-805/Plaza Boulevard BRT station in the traffic analysis. It is unclear what the comment means by "consider the potential for Traffic Oriented Design." Consistent with the requirements of CEQA, the DEIR analyzes impacts of the proposed project in comparison to existing conditions (see CEQA Guidelines Sections 15125(a) and 1526.6(a)). Further- more, the DEIR consider impacts to alternative modes of transit (pedestrians, bicyclists, mass transit) (see DEIR thresholds on page 4.13-46 and the ensuing impact analyses). To the extent the commenter is referring to contemplated (but unconstructed) improvements. This is beyond the scope of the impact analysis (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.2(a) [impacts based upon changes to the "existing physical conditions."]). As discussed in the General Plan Circulation Element, numerous policies have also been implemented to support alternative modes of transit (mass transit, walking, bicycling). 6-9: This comment states that the body of the DEIR does not include suffi- cient traffic data and instead references to Appendix G and H. The Impact of the proposed project as a whole including the "adoption of the General Plan Update" are provided in Table 4.13-6 of the DEIR. The reader was only di- rected to Appendices G and H for component specific traffic analysis. How- ever, pages 4.13-66 to 4.13-67 of the FEIR have been revised to include a brief summary of impacts identified for the Street Conversions/Community Cor- ridors, Kimball Park Master Pan and El Toyon Park Master Plan and detailed project -specific analysis is included in Appendix F Appendices G and H for reference. As noted on DEIR page 4.13-66, trip generation from these project components was included in 'fables 4.3-6 and 4.3-7 and the significance con- clusions. Therefore this information docs not result in new or increased sig- nificant impacts and does not trigger recirculation. However, as discussed under Response to Comment 6-6, CEQA requires analysis of the whole of the action, not the individual components thereof (see Big Rock Mesas Prop. Owners Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 218, 277; see also No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1987) 196 5-56 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND P.=SPON SES CaIApp.3d 223, 235 [analysis required for the project as a whole, not the vari- ous components thereof). This analysis was provided in the DEIR. 5-57 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M M E N T S AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5-58 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS ,,,ND RESFONSFS B. Non -Profit Associations and Members of the Public 5-59 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 3-60 Co: r L w iRouPcu March 10, 2011 Mr. Brad Raulston City of National City Community Development Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City CA 91950 COMMENT LETTER #7 Via Electronic Mail 1140 S. Coast HWY 101 Encinitas, CA 92024 Tel 760-942-8505 brauls ton©nationalcityca. gov Re: Draft National City General Plan Update and DEIR Environmental Health Coalition Comments Dear Mr. Raulston: 760-942-8515 Please accept these comments on behalf of our client, Environmental Health Coalition (EHC), a grassroots organization, located in National City, dedicated to achieving environmental and social justice. EHC believes justice is accomplished by empowered communities acting together to make social change, and has been actively involved in the General Plan Update ("GPU" or "Project") throughout the planning process. EHC looks forward to the GPU as a continuation of its many efforts to bring environmental justice and community benefits to the people of the City of National City ("City"), including the adoption of the Westside Specific Plan. The comments provided below pertain to the GPU itself, specifically the Health and Environmental Justice (HEJ) element, and the supporting draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) prepared for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Specifically, Project impacts to air quality and hazards/hazardous materials are inadequately analyzed in the DEIR, and therefore appropriate mitigation measures are lacking. In response thereto, EHC provides both suggested revisions to the DEIR analysis and proposed mitigation measures to address said impacts. I. The Inclusion of the Health and Environmental Justice Element Will Help Meet Environmental and Social Justice EHC is pleased to see the inclusion of the new and optional GPU element, HEJ.' This element touches upon a variety of EHC's concerns and promotes policies advocated by EHC. Importantly, the Citywide goal HEJ-1 is reflective of EHC's mission to achieve environmental and social justice. Meaningful and effective participation, promotion of community capacity building, and fair treatment of all segments of the public in the process of creating a healthy environment and developing, adopting, implementing, and enforcing environmental laws, regulations, and policies. (GPU, p. 3-231). The remainder of the HEJ goals are likewise laudable and EHC strongly supports the policies and implementation measures associated with these goals. (GPU, p. 3- 213-247). Although the HEJ element is optional, it is evident from the GPU and its implementation measures the City feels strongly about the HEJ goals and policies. 1 Gov. Code §65303. 7-1 7-2 7-3 EHC GPU/DEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 2 All elements of a general plan, whether they are mandatory or optional, are regarded as equally important. In addition, the goals and policies within each element are consistent with each other and with the other elements of the plan. (GPU, p. 1-4). Notwithstanding this sentiment, the HEJ element is in fact given inconsistent treatment in the GPU relative to the other plan elements. The HEJ element lists a set of goals and policies just as other National City GPU elements do. The inconsistency with other Elements shows through a unique section to the element title "Related Policies from Other Elements". For example, policy Safety-8.1 states it will "promote the clean-up and reuse of contaminated sites and prioritize remediation and redevelopment of Brownfield sites within and adjacent to residential and mixed -use areas". The policy lives in the Safety Element and is listed within the "Related Policies from Other Elements" in the HEJ Element instead being included in the HEJ Element. The section is intended to mention policies from other elements related to health and environmental justice. Policies are commonly repeated throughout the document, which creates consistency between elements. Nonetheless, only the HEJ Element has a "Related Policies from Other Elements" section. The State Guidance section on General Plan Basics explains that "all elements of the general plan have equal legal status," therefore, the HEJ Element should be treated equally. None of the other elements (including the other optional Education and Community Participation element) contain the "Related Policies from other Elements" section. Though it is unclear why the HEJ element is treated differently, the irregularity can be easily remedied. Rather than listing the related policies from other elements in the HEJ section, the GPU should simply incorporate the related policies into the HEJ element. Redundancy among elements is common, and simply reinforces said policies. The same should apply to the HEJ element. II. CEQA Review of the General Plan Update As noted above, though the HEJ element is a step in the right direction, EHC encourages the City to strengthen and clarify some of the HEJ policies (and related policies) and goals. Indeed, in light of deficiencies in the CEQA review of the GPU, such policy changes are necessary to mitigate for the Project's significant environmental impacts. Detailed below are specific impacts inappropriately analyzed and/or mitigated, along with EHC recommendations to address said impacts. A. CEQA Principles Applicable to the Project As a preliminary matter, it is important to note the policy considerations behind the CEQA process. CEQA "is to be interpreted 'to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language.' [Citation.]" 2 A basic premise of CEQA is informed decision -making and public participation.3 "An EIR should be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision -makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental 2 Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game Com. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105, 112; Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 563-564; see Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Com. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 274 ("[i]t is, of course, too late to argue for a grudging, miserly reading of CEQA"). 3 Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.App.3d 553; Laurel Heights Improvement Assn v. Regents of Univ. of Cal. (1988) 47 Cal.App. 3d 376; No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68. 7-4 7-5 7-6 EHC GPU/DEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 3 consequences.i4 "Besides informing the agency decision makers themselves, the EIR is intended 'to demonstrate to an apprehensive citizenry that the agency has in fact analyzed and considered the ecological implications of its action." 5 Thus, as an informative document, the EIR is meant to disclose the possible implications of the change that results from the Project. Identification of the significant environmental effects of the Project is one of the primary purposes of the DEIR. (Pub. Res. Code §§21002, 21002.1(a)). An EIR must focus on the significant environmental impacts of a proposed project. (Pub. Res. Code §21100(b)(1); CEQA Guideline §§15126(a), 15126.2(a), 15143). In assessing the impact of the Project, the City should examine the change to the existing environment (ie. the baseline) caused by the Project. (CEQA Guideline §15126.2(a); San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Ctr v. County of Merced (2007) 149 Cal.App. 4'h 645). In particular, the EIR must analyze the significant environmental effects the Project would cause by bringing development and people into the area. (Id.). With respect to a general plan update specifically, "[tjhe EIR must evaluate the environmental impact of a new general plan on the 'actual environment' rather than comparing it to the impact of the preexisting general plan." Watsonville Pilots Assn. v. City of Watsonville, (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 1059, 1080 (citing Environmental Planning & Information Council v. County of El Dorado (1982) 131 Cal.App_3d 350, 354). B. Specific Environmental Impact Areas In assessing both air quality and hazards/hazardous materials impacts the DEIR failed to take into consideration the already impacted environment. (See Kings County Farm Bureau v. City of Hanford, (1990) 221 Cal. App. 3d 692, 718 ("The relevant question to be addressed in the EIR is not the relative amount of precursors emitted by the project when compared with preexisting emissions, but whether any additional amount of precursor emissions should be considered significant in light of the serious nature of the ozone problems in this air basin."); see also Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency, (2002) 103 Cal. App. 4th 98, 121). Thus, for purposes of analyzing Project impacts, it is important to acknowledge the preexisting conditions. The San Diego Air Basin is already in non -attainment for 1-hour and 8- hour state ozone standards and PM,, and PM25, thus any incremental increase in these emissions would be significant. (DEIR, p. 4.3-23) National City children suffer disproportionately from asthma symptoms compared to the rest of San Diego County. (General Plan ("GP"), p. 3-215). In addition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (CORD) is higher within the City. (Id.). These rates are likely higher than reported because the statistics are derived from hospitalization rates. Because many National City residents may not have health insurance, they lack access to health care services —resulting in underestimation of respiratory illness in the City.6 Therefore, any additional air quality impacts will only serve to exacerbate these problems. The DEIR fails to adequately address this reality. 1. Air Quality Impacts Associated Are Inadequately Analyzed in CEQA Guidelines §§ 15151; 15126, 15358(a)(2). 5 Save Tara v. City of West Hollywood, (2008) 45 Cal. 4th 116, 136, quoting No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Ca1.3d 68, 86. 6 National City has over one -and -a -half times the poverty level of the state, and a higher percentage of residents with income below fifty percent of the poverty level than the state average. (http://www.city-data.com/poverty/poverty-National-City-California.html) 7-6 Cont. 7-7 7-8 EHC GPUIDEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 4 the DEIR Though the DEIR acknowledges the Project will result in a significant impact to regional air quality, the DEIR is deficient in characterizing the nature of the impact. The increases in vehicle trips and VMT would not only be higher than anticipated by current regional planning documents (ie. the RAQS/SIP and Clean Air Plan), they would also result in net increases in emissions over time —thus exacerbating or creating air quality impacts. The DEIR relies on the Appendix G checklist for thresholds of significance. However, Appendix G is merely instructive. (Eureka Citizens for Responsible Government v. City of Eureka, (2007) 147 Cal. App. 4th 357, 377 ("Use of the forms is only 'suggested,' and the forms do not define the scope of the CEQA inquiry.")). Questions of significance may require modification to ensure all of a proiect's potentially significant impacts are adequately addressed. (Kostka & Zischke, Practice Under the California Environmental Quality Act, CEB 2011, §13.15 (emphasis added). Further, if evidence tends to show an environmental impact might be significant despite the significance standard in the EIR, an agency must address this evidence.(Protect the Historic Amador Waterways v. Amador Water Agency, (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 1099, 1111). While relying on the Appendix G thresholds, the DEIR uses an inappropriate baseline in analyzing air quality impacts by using the adopted General Plan build -out to assess vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle trips (and resultant emissions) compared to GPU build -out and VMT.' (DEIR, p. 4.3-34). The DEIR cites a 7.8 percent increase in vehicle trips at 601,492 per day with the "currently adopted General Plan" to 648,452 per day with the proposed update. (Id.) However, the significance determination is based on the change in rate of VMT per person. (Id.) As a result, air quality impacts are not only insufficiently analyzed, but artificially made to appear less significant. For example, the DEIR relies on the VMT per capita increase from 27.53 to 27.72 per person. But the total resultant air emissions associated with the net increase in VMT will be much greater than the increase in VMT per person because the GPU will result in a higher density. Rather, the total net increase in vehicle trips or VMT over baseline (ie. existing conditions) is the appropriate figure from which to extrapolate emissions. One statistic is given for existing conditions: a 32 percent increase in vehicle miles traveled.(Id.) At a minimum, the DEIR should provide the emissions which will result from a 32 percent increase in VMT.8 "PM,,, and PM25 are both a regional and localized air pollutant. The primary sources of these pollutants are local traffic (exhaust and re -suspended road dust)...". (DEIR, p_ 4.3-23). In addition, approximately 96 percent of diesel particulate matter (DPM) is from mobile sources and it "by far makes up the greatest inhalation health risk in the San Diego area." (DEIR, p. 4.3- 27). Therefore, increased vehicle trips and VMT would surely increase DPM and other particulate matter —thereby causing significant air quality impacts to those susceptible to DPM The DEIR makes reference to a memorandum from Chris Gray of Fehr & Peers to Brooke Peterson, dated October 28, 2010. This memorandum does not seem to have been provided with the DEIR or appendices. Appendix H (Las Palmas Park Expansion Traffic Impact Study) and the Transportation and Circulation Element do consider existing conditions, as well as traffic from 2030 build -out under the current General Plan compared to 2030 build -out under the General Plan Update. Thus, there should be vehicle trip statistics available for existing baseline conditions. 8 In addition, in GPU Table 5-1 (Indicators) the VMT per capita is measured by average daily traffic volumes, but the existing conditions measurement is "TBD". This figure should be provided for inclusion in the DEIR. 7-8 cont. 7-9 7-10 7-11 7-12 EHC GPUIDEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 5 and other particulate matter inhalation.9 The DEIR must quantify these impacts in order to provide the sufficient degree of analysis to inform the public and decision -makers. (CEQA Guideline §15151). 2. The DEIR Air Quality Analysis Deficiencies Implicate the Mitigation Measures Discussion Because the DEIR mischaracterizes the resultant air quality impacts as simple non - attainment of regional planning objectives, the City fails to offer any mitigation measures, finding there are none available. This practice follows from Impact AQ-1 to AQ-3, AQ-4, and AQ-5. However, CEQA requires that an EIR propose mitigation measures to reduce or avoid significant impacts. (PRC §21100(b)(3)). If air quality impacts associated with the Project's increase in VMT and vehicle trips were properly quantified and thereafter described in the DEIR, appropriate mitigation measures could be identified. Contrary to the position taken in the DEIR, measures are available to mitigate these /oca/ and regional impacts by reducing the source of such emissions (ie. decreasing total vehicle trips and VMT) and by reducing the proximity of sensitive land uses to sources of emissions (ie. freeways and major corridors).10 Further, because PM1D and PM25 are localized pollutants, citywide avoidance and mitigation measures could reduce their impacts on residents. (DEIR, p. 4.3-25) Other mitigation measures may be found in the GPU itself. For example, the GPU Policy HEJ-2.3 to "[avvoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a freeway unless such development contributes to smart growth...and/or other effective measures to minimize potential impacts from air pollution" could be strengthened to mitigate or avoid air quality impacts that will result from increased vehicle trips. (GP, p. 3-234). EHC further proposes the following: Prohibit the siting of sensitive land uses within 500 feet from the centerline of a freeway.' 1 Strengthen HEJ Policy 2.1 by removing the "where feasible" qualification to avoiding land use conflicts by ensuring residential, public assembly, and sensitive land uses are buffered from industrial land uses. Further require a 1000-foot buffer between the aforementioned uses and industrial facilities. • Repeat the HEJ Policy 2.1 in LU Policy 3.6 including the 1000-foot buffer requirement therein. Strengthen Policies C-1.1, C-4.1 to C-4.7 by incorporating stronger language and/or mandates. Strengthen the National City Climate Action Plan: • Policy A2.b.1. by supporting transit options first, including a functional light rail transit system in the San Diego County urban core. • Policy A2.b.2. by implement a bike master plan for a bicycle corridor. • Policy B3.a.1. by adopting a 100 percent Clean Vehicle Replacement Policy for 9 DPM is merely illustrative of the potential TAC air quality impacts associated with the increased VMT and vehicle trips. Other compounds, including other TACs, are primarily associated with mobile sources, (DEIR, p. 4.3-26-27). 10 Gov. Code §65302.4 (The land use element may "provide specific measures for regulating relationships between buildings, and between buildings and outdoor public areas, including streets."). 11 CARB Air Quality and Land Use Handbook, 2005: Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a freeway, urban roads with 100,000 vehicles/day, or rural roads with 50,000 vehicles/day. 7-12 cont. 7-13 7-14 EHC GPU/DEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 6 the City fleet and contracted fleet services. (see also Policy CS-1.4) 3. The DEIR Fails to Adequately Analyze Hazards/Hazardous Materials Impacts As with the preexisting conditions affecting air quality analysis above, the City faces similar issues with regard to industrial facilities and other facilities which store, transfer, emit, or use hazardous materials. The City has a disproportionate number of hazardous material facilities: According to data compiled by the Environmental Health Coalition (EHC), National City has a greater number of hazardous materials facilities per square mile than the incorporated areas of San Diego County, particularly within the Westside (Old Town) neighborhood where some of these facilities are within close proximity to residential uses. Through implementation of National City's Westside Specific Plan, the city is in the process of addressing this mix of land uses that are part of the Westside neighborhood. (GPU, p. 3-115). Moreover, not all industrial facilities which emit TACs have been properly identified. For example, an EHC walk-through of the Westside in September 2009 found 25 unlisted facilities, compared to the nine listed facilities. Because the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act requires emitters to self -report, the CARB inventory is frequently incomplete absent some independent verification.12 The identification of facilities which contain, emit, or are associated with hazardous substances is likely underestimated in the GPU and DEIR. Thus, the addition of new industrial facilities will compound existing impacts and increase chances of exposure of sensitive receptors to hazardous materials. The DEIR not only fails to address the disproportionately high number of hazardous material facilities, but further underestimates the significant impacts associated with the use, transport and disposal of hazardous facilities. by assuming any "risk of death, injury, and/or property loss is lessened through federal, State, and local regulations and policies." (DEIR, p. 4.7-22-24). Again, Appendix G is merely instructive and not the only measure of significant impacts. Further, the DEIR's finding of no significant impact is based on its artificial constraint of impacts which result in "death, injury or property loss". Significant impacts also result from exposure to hazardous materials and/or emissions, especially by sensitive receptors. (See Appendix G, VI.c. regarding exposure to sensitive receptors at schools). The State of California General Plan Guidelines (2003) further explains, "[o]verconcentration occurs when two or more industrial facilities or uses, which do not individually exceed acceptable regulatory standards for public health and safety, pose a significant hazard to adjacent residential and school uses due to their cumulative effects." (State of California General Plan Guidelines (2003), p. 26). Thus, where industrial facilities are (1) undetected or unaccounted for in planning documents or the DEIR, or (2) appropriately identified but do not meet emission or use thresholds for regulation, the cumulative impact or overconcentration results in a significant impact. The DEIR's assumption that existing regulations and policies will adequately address these impacts to a level of insignificance is therefore inappropriate, especially where accurate identification and regulation of hazardous facilities does not occur. As with the DEIR air quality impacts, mitigation measures are available yet unidentified in the DEIR as a result of inadequate impact analysis. The mitigation measures identified in the air quality analysis above may also be tailored to address hazardous material impacts. For 12 Health and Safety Code § 44300 et seq.; DEIR, p. 3.2-10. I 7-14 1 Cont. 7-15 7-16 7-17 7-18 7-19 EHC GPU/DEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 7 example, strengthening HEJ Policy 2.1 by removing the "where feasible" qualification to avoiding land use conflicts and requiring a 1000-foot buffer between the sensitive land uses and industrial facilities would mitigate both air quality and hazardous materials impacts. In addition, GPU Policies S-7.1 and S-7.2 may be changed to "require" as opposed to merely "promote" use of BACT and may be extended to apply to all industrial facilities, not just City operations. (DEIR, p. 4.7-23). Additionally, periodic review and reevaluation of BACT every few years would mitigate potential impacts. 4. The Hazardous Material Section Fails to Analyze the Significant Impact from Lead -Based Paint As a preliminary matter, EHC strongly supports HEJ Goal 7 to eliminate the health risks associated with lead -based paint, mold, and other contaminants. (GPU, p. 3-246). Policies HEJ 7.1 to 7.4 are an important first step in achieving this goal, along with implementation measure PT-25. (Id; GPU, p. 4-24). However, in order to strengthen the policies and achieve the goal, EHC suggests a new implementation measure, or an addition to the existing measure, which requires remediation of homes by landlords or owners where lead -based paint is identified after inspection. Further, such remediation should be required to take place within a specific amount of time for those homes in which children are frequently present (EHC suggests a 60-day deadline for remediation). (GPU, p. 4-24). The City of San Diego has adopted a lead paint ordinance13 which requires inspection every time a unit becomes vacant, and requires remediation upon identification of lead -based paint.14 EHC encourages the City to adopt a similar ordinance, in addition to the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program.' Importantly, the DEIR fails to mention the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program, or the threat of lead -based paint exposure during redevelopment.16 Because the City is almost fully developed, most growth within the City will result from redevelopment. (GPU, p. 3-1). Further, because "approximately 85 percent of the residential dwelling units in the City were constructed prior to 1980 ", it is very likely most of these units contain lead -based paint, which was widely used in homes prior to 1978. (GPU, p. 3-228). As the GPU explains, "exposure to lead often occurs when paint is again, peeling, or being removed." (Id.). Therefore, as the majority of residential dwelling units are remodeled, remediated, or redeveloped under the GPU, exposure to lead -based paint will certainly occur, resulting in a significant environmental impact. (See Appendix G, Ill.d. "Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations"). By attracting more people to the area, the Project will also result in increased exposure to hazardous lead -based paint. (See CEQA Guideline §15126.2(a) (The Project "would have the effect of attracting people to the location and exposing them to the hazards found there")). This especially true for residents doing any repainting or remodeling with small children present, as found in a recent New York study: "San Diego Municipal Code (SDMC) §§54.1001-54.1015. (Attached) 14 Owners have a duty to correct lead hazards in a dwelling unit anytime they are found to be present, not just at unit turnover. (SDMC §54.1007) (Instruction Sheet attached herewith) 15 http://www.ci.national-city.ca.us/index.aspx?page=540 16 However, the DEIR does acknowledge the significant impact that may result from the redevelopment of sites with existing groundwater or soils contamination through release of such materials into the environment. (DEIR, p. 4.7-47). Similarly, redevelopment of homes with lead - based paint will result in a significant impact through "release of such materials into the environment." (Id.) 7-19 cont. 7-20 EHC GPU/DEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 8 RRP [Renovation, Repair, and Painting] activities were identified as the probable source of lead exposure in 139 (14%) of the 972 children. Resident owners or tenants performed 66% of the RRP work, which often included sanding and scraping (42%), removal of painted materials or structures (29%), and other activities (29%) that can release particles of lead -based paint. RRP activities continued to be an important source of lead exposure during 2006--2007. Children living in housing built before 1978 (when lead -based paint was banned from residential use) that are undergoing RRP activities should be considered at high risk for elevated BLLs [blood lead levels], and appropriate precautions should be taken to prevent exposure." Therefore, to address the Project's significant environmental impacts that will result from the exposure to lead -based paint, EHC suggests the mitigation measure described above —a policy and implementation measure requiring inspection and remediation with a deadline for residences where children frequent.18 III. Conclusion Unless the City adequately addresses the significant environmental impacts described that will result from the GPU as detailed above, the DEIR will remain deficient, and will fail to meet CEQA mandates. Therefore, we urge the City to carefully consider EHC's comments, and to incorporate EHC's suggestions into the DEIR and GPU. If you have any questions, please contact Coast Law Group LLP at your earliest convenience. Sincerely, COAST LAW GROU •/ LP /gam Marco A. Gonzalez Livia Borak Attorneys for Environmental Health Coalition CC: Client Raymond Pe (rpenationalcitvca.qov) Mayor Ron Morrison (rmorrison©nationalcitvcaMov) Vice Mayor Alejandra Sotelo-Solis (asotelosolis ©nalionalcityca.gov) Councilmember Louie Natividad (Iatividadationalcitvca.gov) Councilmember Mona Rios (rnonarios(nationaicityca.gov) 17 CDC. Children with Elevated Blood Lead Levels Related to Home Renovation, Repair, and Painting Activities --- New York State, 2006--2007. MMWR. January 30, 2009; 58(03):55-58. (Attached) (available at http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5803a3.htm) 18 See CDC, Building Blocks for Primary Prevention, Protecting Children from Lead -Based Paint Hazards, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/publications/Building_Blocks_for_Primary_Prevention. pdf 7-20 cont. 7-21 EHC GPU/DEIR Comment Letter March 10, 2011 Page 9 Councilmember Rosalie Zarate (rzarate(c�nationalcityca.gov) City Manager, Chris Zapata (cmo@naitonalcityca,_gpv) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5-70 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COM M t N S AND RESPONSES Letter 7: Marco Gonzalez and Livia Borak, Attorneys for Environmental Health Coalition, March 10, 2011. 7-1: This comment acknowledges that the Environmental Health Coalition (EHC) has reviewed and commented on the DM. EHC recognizes the City's efforts to bring environmental justice and community benefits to the residents. 7-2: This comment specifics that EHC's comments pertain to both the Gen- eral Plan Update and DEIR, focusing on impacts to air quality and haz- ards/hazardous materials. The comment also states that the DEIR does not adequately analyze impacts to air quality or hazards/hazardous materials and associated mitigation measures and suggestions revisions to the DEIR. Please note that CEQA only requires the City to draft response to comments on significant environmental issues, not planning issues. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(c) and 15204(a).) Detailed responses to the commenter's spe- cific comments regarding air quality and hazards/hazardous materials impacts and mitigation measures are provided in Comments 7-6 through 7-20 below. 7-3: This comment focuses on the Health and Environmental Justice Ele- ment of the General Plan and is not related to the DEIR. No additional re- sponse is required. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(c) and 15204(a).) 7-4: This comment focuses on the Health and Environmental Justice Ele- ment of the proposed General Plan (pages 3-213 through 3-248) and is not related to the DF.TR. No additional response is required. However, the City would note that Government Code 65301(a) provides that "[t]he general plan may be adopted in any format deemed appropriate or convenient by the legis- lative body, including the combining of elements." This gives the City discre- tion to determine the appropriate format for the General Plan. This is be- cause the content requirements under Government Code 65302 can have du- plicative information. This is why numerous Elements in the General Plan provide cross references to other Elements with related policies and informa- 5-7 I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES tion (see proposed General Plan pages 3-24, 3-26, 3-27, 3-28, etc.). However, the City went one step further in the Health and Environmental Justice Ele- ment. Because of the number of policies related to IIealth and Environ- mental Justice, the actual text of the related policies was provided in the IIealth and Environmental Justice Element, rather than simply providing cross references, as was provided in other sections of the General Plan. The comment suggests that the "GPU should simply incorporate the related poli- cies into the HEJ element." The policies are already included in the Health and Environmental Justice Element, starting on page 3-232. It is therefore unclear what additional revisions are sought by the commenter. Furthermore, as discussed on DEIR page 3-13, when projects are reviewed for consistency with the General Plan, they are reviewed for consistency with the entire General Plan, not individual Elements. Nevertheless, the commenter's suggestions will be forwarded to the decision makers for their consideration. 7-5: This comment references the policies contained within the IIealth and Environmental Justice Element of the proposed General Plan. This comment states that the policy changes suggested for the General Plan are necessary to mitigate significant environmental impacts, as detailed in subsequent com- ments. Detailed responses to the commenter's specific comments regarding the DEIR impact analysis and mitigation measures are provided in Continents 7-6 through 7-20 below. No additional response is required. 7-6: This comment explains that an EIR must evaluate the environmental impacts of a project based on the change to the existing environment. For a General Plan this means comparing it to the `actual environment,' rather than the currently adopted General Plan. This comment has been noted. The impact analysis of the DEIR compared the proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update project to the existing physical environment. This basic methodology was described on page 4-2 of the DEIR- Please also note that "[a]n EIR on a project such as the adoption or amendment of a comprehensive zoning ordinance or a local general plan should focus on the secondary effects 5-72 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES that can be expected to follow from the adoption, or amendment, but the EIR need not be as detailed as an EIR on the specific construction projects that might follow." Furthermore, CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(a) provides that "re- viewers should be aware that the adequacy of an F.IR is determined in terms of what is reasonably feasible, in light of factors such as the magnitude of the project at issue, the severity of its likely environmental impacts, and the geo- graphic scope of the project. CEQA does not require a lead agency to con- duct every test or perform all research, study, and experimentation recom- mended or demanded by commentors." 7-7: This comment states that the DEIR fails to adequately address the preex- isting air quality conditions since the San Diego Air Basin is already in non - attainment for 1-hour and 8-hour State ozone standards and PMIo and PM2.5, and any incremental increase in these emissions would be significant. The DEIR describes existing conditions, starting on page 4.3-15. This discus- sion includes federal and State air quality attainment status, on page 4.3-25 of the DEIR. Contrary to the assertion in the comment, existing conditions are not impacts of the project. (See Watsonville Pilots Association v. City of Wat- sonville (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 1059 ["The FEIR was not required to resolve the [existing] overdraft problem, a feat that was far beyond its scope"]; see also Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. City of Beaumont (2010) 190 Ca1.App.4th 316, 118 Ca1.Rptr.3d 182, 201 through 207.) Furthermore, contrary to the comment, the DEIR concludes that there would be a significant and unavoidable impact associated with buildout of the regulatory changes under the threshold "Conflict with or obstruct implemen- tation of the applicable air quality management plan." (DEIR page 4.3-43, 4.3-55.) Furthermore the DEIR also concludes there would he a significant and unavoidable impact associated with construction and operation of the Regulatory Changes under the threshold "Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation" (see DEIR pages 4.3-45, 4.3-47, 4.3-53, and 4.3-55). 5-73 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENT; AND RESPONSES 7-8: This comment states that although the DEIR finds a significant impact to regional air quality, it does not adequately describe the impacts associated with an increase in vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The comment also states that the "the increases in vehicle trips and VMT would not only be higher than anticipated by current regional planning documents (i.e. the RAQS/SIP and Clean Air Plan)..." The DEIR analysis relied upon an updated traffic modeling program (Southbay III) that was calibrated and validated, as discussed on DEIR pages 4.13-39 through 4.13-43. These results were then used as inputs into the Air Quality modeling which was based upon CARB's EMFAC2007 model and URBEMIS2007 (see DF.TR page 4.3-46 and 4.13-31). The DEIR finds signifi- cant and unavoidable impacts to air quality associated with an increase in VMT, as stated in Section 4.3 Air Quality, page 4.3-43. The impact analysis further notes on page 4.3-43, that the increase in VMT would conflict with regional planning efforts to attain ambient air quality standards. 7-9: This comment questions the adequacy of the thresholds of significance used in the DFTR and suggests that an EIR must address all impacts that might be significant regardless of the significance standards used in the EIR, however, no evidence is provided that air quality impacts were inadequately addressed through use of the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G thresholds. Contrary to the assertion in the comment, the City reviewed the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G thresholds and tailored them to the project. For ex- ample compare the biological resource thresholds under Appendix G to the DEIR's biology thresholds on page 4.4-70. 7-10: The comment suggests that by using the thresholds provided under CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, the first air quality threshold is inconsistent with other requirements under the CEQA Guidelines; i.e. to provide an analysis in comparison to existing conditions. The analysis referenced in the comment is on DEIR pages 4.3-32 through 4.3-43. CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(d) provides that "[t]he F,TR shall discuss any inconsistencies between the proposed project and the applicable general plans, specific plans and regional 5-74 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR LOMMERTS AND RESPONSES plans. Such regional plans include...the applicable air quality attainment or maintenance plan (or State Implementation Plan)..." (CEQA Guidelines Sec- tion 15125(d)) (see also CEQA Guidelines Section 15064(h)(3) which provides that "A lead agency may determine that a project's incremental contribution to a cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable if the project will comply with the requirements in a previously approved plan or mitigation program (including, but not limited to, ...air quality attainment or mainte- nance plan...)." This consistency analysis is included under the first significance threshold starting on page 4.3-32. While legal consistency is not strictly a "physical im- pact on the environment', the EIR assumes any inconsistency would be a significant impact, and therefore provides a conservative analysis. Further- more, the analysis does note that "vehicle miles traveled would increase by 32 percent over existing conditions..." (DEIR page 4.3-34.) The comment goes on to state that the DEIR should provide the emissions which will result from a 32 percent increase in VMT." This requested infor- mation and impact analysis is provided under the second significance thresh- old's analysis starting on page 4.3-43 ("Violate any air quality standard or con- tribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation"). Table 4.3-8 provides total operational emissions in 2030 with buildout of the Com- prehensive Land Use Update. This second impact analysis was made in com- parison to existing conditions and was determined to be significant and un- avoidable. ' Consistency or inconsistency with a plan alone does not result in an envi- ronmental impact. As discussed in a leading CEQA treatise Taira inconsistency be- tween a proposed project and an applicable plan is a legal determination, not a physi- cal impact on the environment. See Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa Cruz (2035) 131 Cal.App.4th 1170..." (Kostka & Zischke, Practice Under the California Environmental Quality Act, (2d ed Cal CEB, January 2011), p. 612, Q 12.34.) 5-75 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMON r5 AND RE SPOIL S Et The comment also states that 'fable 5-1 (page 5-11) of the General Plan should be revised to reflect Existing Conditions. This change was made in the document. 7-11: This comment recommends using the net increase in VMT or vehicle trips over the baseline to determine the air quality impacts. Refer to Re- sponse 7-10 above. 7-12: The comment states that "...the primary sources of these pollutants [PMit and PMzs] are local traffic...therefore, increased vehicle trips and VMT would surely increase DPM and other particulate matter -thereby causing sig- nificant air quality impacts..." Contrary to the reasoning in the comment, an increase in VMT does not necessarily result in an increase in criteria pollut- ants. Air quality has improved for a number of criteria pollutants over the previous two decades despite increases in population and associated vehicle trips. As discussed on DEIR page 43-24 San Diego County has come into attainment for several criteria pollutants despite more stringent standards and population increases: Additionally, San Diego County is currently designated as an attainment area for CO, NO2, Pb, SO2, and sulfates. The SDAB has not violated the annual NAAQS for NO2 since 1978 and has not violated the one -hour CAAQS for NO; since 1988; and has never recorded violations of the SO2 standard. Federal standards for Pb have not been exceeded since 1980, and State standards for Pb have not been exceeded since 1987. The SDAB was once a nonattainment area for CO, but has not violated the CO standard since 1990. Furthermore, as discussed on DEIR page 4.3-30, CARB estimates that "risk from diesel particulate matter decreased by about 50 percent since 1990." This reduction has occurred despite an increase in population within National City and other areas within the County (see National City population statis- tics on page 1-9 of the proposed General Plan). This reduction has occurred 5-76 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES in part because of other reduction programs. As discussed on page 4.3-14 of the DEIR: "California has adopted a comprehensive diesel risk reduction program. The EPA has adopted low sulfur diesel fuel standards that will reduce diesel particulate matter substantially, which went into effect in June 2006. CARB recently adopted regulations that require fleet owners of off -road construction equipment or on -road heavy-duty diesel vehicles to retrofit or replace their fleets to reduce the overall DPM emissions." Similar fuel efficiency increases are discussed on page 4.3-47 of the DLIR. Nevertheless, the DEIR concludes that there would be significant and un- avoidable impacts associated with particulate matter under the first and sec- ond significance thresholds in the air quality chapter (see Response to Com- ment 7-7 for discussion of significance conclusions). This comment calls for the quantification of the air quality impacts associated with PMio, PMzs and diesel particulate matter (DPM) resulting from increased vehicle trips and VMT. CEQA does not require quantification of every im- pact, contrary to the suggestion in the comment. As discussed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7 "[a] threshold of significance is an identifiable quantitative, qualitative or performance level of a particular environmental effect, non-compliance with which means the effect will normally be deter- mined to be significant by the agency..." Nevertheless, as discussed in Section 4.3.b.i.c and shown in Table 4.3-8 on page 4.3-48 of the DEIR, both PMio and PM2s emissions are projected for the Year 2030 buildout scenario. The pro- jections are based on trip length assumptions, shown in Appendix B of the DEIR. Therefore, projected increases in PMIc and PM2.5 are appropriately developed using standard analytical practices. 7-13: This comment suggests the quantification of impacts associated with the Project's increase in VMT and vehicle trips is necessary and would make feasible mitigation measures available for Impacts AQ-1, AQ-3, AQ-4 and AQ-5. Refer to Response 7-12 above. As noted above, the DEIR concludes 5-77 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES that impacts would be significant and unavoidable. The severity of the im- pact did not control the feasibility of the mitigation measures in this ETR. The comment suggests as mitigation (1) "decreasing total vehicle trips and VMT", and (2) by "reducing the proximity of sensitive land uses to sources of emissions (i.e. freeways and major corridors)." As discussed under Response to Comment 5-6, the proposed General Plan Circulation Element, and DEIR Section 4.13, a number of policies have been proposed to help reduce VMT. However, the comment does not provide any additional suggestions for how such a requirement could he implemented. The City does not have direct control over VMT. While the City has pro- posed a number of policies to reduce trip generation and VMT, trip genera- tion is ultimately controlled by the will of individual drivers. As to the second suggested measure, the proposed General Plan already con- tains several policies which address the suggestion. Therefore additional re- lated policies would not reduce or avoid impacts. Policy HEJ-2.3: Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet from the centerline of a freeway, unless such development contributes to smart growth, open space, or transit -oriented goals, in which case the de- velopment shall include feasible measures such as separation/setbacks, landscaping, barriers, ventilation systems, air filters/cleaners, and/or other effective measures to minimize potential impacts from air pollu- tion. Policy LU-3.6: Prohibit the establishment of new residential and other sensitive land uses near industrial land uses and within the Harbor Dis- trict (unless proposed as part of a mixed -use development adjacent to the 8th Street Trolley stop) and buffer existing residential uses and other sen- sitive land uses from industrial uses, while protecting and enhancing visi- tor serving, commercial, retail, industrial, working -waterfront, and mari- time related job -producing industries. 5-78 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR CONS MENTS AND RESPONSES Policy HEJ-2.1: Avoid land use conflicts by ensuring residential, public assembly, and other sensitive land uses are adequately buffered from in- dustrial land uses that may pose a threat to human health, where feasible. The comment further states "because PM:c and PM2 5 are localized pollutants, citywide avoidance and mitigation measures could reduce their impacts on residents." The DEIR analyzed several alternatives that had reduced devel- opment in comparison to the proposed project (see DEIR Table 5-1). How- ever as discussed in the Alternatives Chapter, the City considered a substan- tially reduced density (referenced in the comment as "citywide avoidance") alternative, but determined that while some localized impacts, such as local air quality and traffic, would be reduced, this would increase regional impacts by an amount greater than the equivalent reduction: "While reduced density within National City as a whole would generally reduce localized impacts within National City, it would result in in- creased regional effects associated with urban sprawl. In general, the im- pacts of urban sprawl development patterns tend to he more severe than the impacts of concentrated growth in the urban core. Growth at the ur- ban fringe typically results in longer commute times and inefficient ex- pansion of infrastructure resulting in increases in agricultural land con- version, habitat loss, traffic, air pollution, demand on utility systems, and GHG emissions as well as greater depletion of natural resources. SAN- DAG has developed a Smart Growth Concept Map as part of its Regional Comprehensive Plan with Existing/Planned and Potential smart growth opportunity areas. Within this area portion of National City has been designated a "Town Center" and a "Mixed Use Transit Corridor." These are intended to better connect land use and transportation and were used in the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan to guide the planning and de- velopment of the region's future transit networks, providing higher pri- ority for peak period transit services that link smart growth areas to one another and to other major activity centers, and achieve the region's GHG emission reduction targets. 3-79 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND F E S P O N S E S Therefore, while reduced density within National City would reduce en- vironmental impacts in some resource areas within the Planning Area compared to the land use plan in the proposed Community Land Use Update, it would not reduce environmental effects from a regional per- spective. Consequently, a reduced density alternative would likely result in urban sprawl, and thus, greater regional impacts" (DEIR pages 5-34 and 5-35). 7-14: The comment suggests mitigation measures "found in the GPU itself." These policies are already part of the proposed project. An EIR is required to address the impacts of the project as proposed, not the impacts of some hypo- thetical project (i.e. without the proposed policies). (Village Laguna of Laguna Beach, Inc. v. Board of . Supervisors (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 1022, 1030.) 1'he comment suggests the following revisions: 1. Prohibiting the siting of sensitive land uses within 500 feet from the centerline of a freeway and strengthen HEJ Policy 2.1 by remov- ing the "where feasible" qualification. While Policy HEJ-2.3 contains some exceptions for smart growth and other related developments, such exceptions arc necessary to provide suf- ficient flexibility' and to balance other competing planning and environ- mental considerations. While air quality is an important consideration, the City has to balance other factors and risks, such as fire risks, flood risks, geologic hazards, hazardous materials, biological impacts, aesthetic impacts, agricultural resources, hydrology and water quality, land use, noise, population and housing, public services and recreation, utilities, GHG emissions, cultural resource impacts, as well as local impacts versus regional impacts. These factors will he considered at the time specific s As discussed under OPR's 2003 General Plan Guidelines, "given the long- term nature of a general plan, its diagrams and text should be general enough to allow a degree of flexibility in decision -making as times change." (Office of Planning and Research 2003 General Plan Guidelines, page 14.) 5-80 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTSAND RESPONSES projects are proposed. Eliminating these exceptions is considered infeasi- ble because it would provide insufficient flexibility and would be incon- sistent with the project objectives (one of the project objectives is provid- ing a "flexible framework..."). Furthermore such a revision would place air quality above consideration of other resource areas and could result in increased impacts to other re- sources areas and would therefore not he environmentally superior (i.e. forcing development away from transportation corridors increasing GHG emissions, or forcing development into flood zones or fire zones...)." Furthermore, even CEQA recognizes that there will be times in which mitigation measures are infeasible. As discussed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4 "An EIR shall describe feasible measures which could minimize significant adverse impacts."" Elimination of "where feasible" would place restrictions on project specific development even more stringent than those required by CEQA itself. Furthermore, such a restriction without "where feasible" could potentially result in a taking of private property. Lastly, the commenter's suggested policy revision would result in a high number of non -conforming uses and could lead to an increase in urban decay and blight in those areas. Such conditions could preclude rein- vestment in these areas which could prevent installation and maintenance of ventilation systems, air filters/cleaners and other effective measures to minimize existing air quality problems and other existing environmental conditions (i.e. earthquake retrofits, etc...). 2. Require a 1000-foot buffer between uses and industrial facilities. See previous response "I". Unlike the freeway buffer, there are a number of different types of Industrial facilities that have different air pollutant characteristics.. Even the California Air Resources Board's Advisory Guidelines on Land Use recommend different buffers for different indus- trial facilities (i.e. distribution centers, rail yards, ports, refineries, chrome platers...) .o require a 1000 foot buffer would provide the City insuffi- cient flexibility to tailor such buffers to specific proposed facilities and the specific conditions on site. Site specific buffer distances will be con- 5-8 I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M M- N- S AND R C S P O N S C S sidered at the time specific projects are proposed and parcel spe- cific/project specific information can be assessed. 3. Repeat HEJ Policy 2.1 in LU Policy 3.6. As discussed under Response to Comment 7-4, these policies are already included in the proposed General Plan. Projects are reviewed for consis- tency with the whole General Plan, not individual elements. It is there- fore unnecessary to repeat every policy in the Health and Environmental Justice Element or the Land Use Element. Furthermore, repeating poli- cies throughout the General Plan could result in future complications when the General Plan is being amended. For example, a policy could be amended in one section, but similar revisions could he missed in another section. While this is not related to an environmental issue, such revi- sions will he forwarded to the decision makers for their consideration. 4. Strengthening Policies C-1.1, C-4.1 to C-4.7 by incorporating stronger language and/or mandates. A. Policy C-1.1 See response to "1" above. Additionally, it is infeasible to "mandate" transit oriented development, mixed -use and infill projects (Policy C-1.1). The City does not own many of the parcels throughout the City. The decision to build projects, such as mixed use developments, is largely at the will of the individual property owner. Similarly, as discussed on General Plan page 1-16, implementation of the General Plan can take time and is dependent upon limited resources and policy considerations which prioritize programs. Mandating such development would also re- move the needed flexibility to prioritize programs and is therefore con- sidered infeasible. However, it is important to note that General Plan policies should not be reviewed in a vacuum. Projects are analyzed for consistency with the General Plan as a whole. As noted in Response to Comment 5-6, the General Plan already contains policies which require development of multi -modal transportation facilities with certain types of new development projects. Further, the commenter is requesting man- dates that are more restrictive that the California Air Resources Board 1-82 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M M E N I S AND RLSPONSES (GARB) guidelines. Current draft General Plan policies are consistent with suggested CARB guidelines. B. Policy C-4.1 See response to "1" above. Furthermore, the City does not have legal au- thority to mandate specific work hours. C. Policy C-4.2 See response to "1" above. Furthermore, the City does not have legal au- thority to mandate commuter programs. However, please see Response to Comment 5-6 for discussion of alternative modes of transit, including General Plan Implementation measure PT-1C (Commuter Benefits Pro- gram). D. Policy C-4.3 The policy already "[r]equires new uses to provide adequate bicycle park- ing and support facilities." It is unclear how the commenter believes this policy should be further revised. E. Policy C-4.4 See response 4(B) on Policy C-4.2 above. F. Policy C-4.5 Sec response 4(B) on Policy C-4.2 above. G. Policy C-4.6 The Policy currently states "prioritize attention to transportation issues around schools to reduce school -related vehicle trips. It is unclear how the commenter would revise this policy. It is also important to note that these General Plan policies do not exist in a vacuum. All of the goals and policies have been proposed as part of a comprehensive system. As noted in both the General Plan and the DEIR, the City is already in the process of implementing the safe routes to school program (see General Plan page 3-60, 4-16; DEIR page 4.13-3C). Furthermore, many of the street closures 5-83 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR O M M F N` 5 AND RESPONSES and park renovations are designed to "provides a community center that is integrated into the adjacent neighborhoods and schools...." (see DEIR pages 3-11, 3-71, 3-74, and 3-77). H. Policy C-4.7 See response to "1" above. I. Strengthen National City Climate Action Plan by: A. Policy A2.b.1. by supporting transit options first, including a functional light rail transit system in the San Diego County urban core. See also Response to "1" above. Further, the City does not have jurisdic- tion over the light rail transit system and future system improvements and investments. Further to support "transit options first" as the com- menter suggests would preclude certain other activities that may be im- mediately necessary (maintenance, repair, emergencies, planned im- provements) therefore, the City can not exclusively prioritize transit - first. Furthermore, such a policy would preclude roadway improvements that are designed to foster alternative modes of transit such as the pro- posed street closures and community corridors in the General Plan. Fur- thermore, such a policy would preclude construction of relatively minor changes to roadways that have low costs and large benefits. Such a policy lacks sufficient flexibility and could result in the creation of additional impacts by precluding consideration of the circulation system as a whole" As discussed in CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, Section XVI, projects are to consider impacts to "the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation, including mass transit and non -motorized travel and rele- vant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit." 5-84 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMVENTS AND RESPONSES Furthermore, the land use plan identified in the draft General Plan is consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The City of National City is a member agency of SANDAG and wants to ensure that General Plan and Climate Action Plan policies are consistent with the RTP and as such, must allow for an integrated system rather than exclu- sively prioritizing one project or infrastructure investment over another. B. Policy A2.b.2. by implementing a bike master plan for a bicycle corridor: It is important to understand that while the City has taken a number of steps to implement the General Plan, including the Land Use Code and the Climate Action Plan. Implementation of the General Plan will take time and will occur over the lifetime of the plan, as discussed further on General Plan page 1-16 (see also Government Code Section 65400). It is not feasible to provide every implementation measure for the General Plan, or every potential municipal code revision at this time. However, in 2011, the City adopted a Bike Master Plan. Furthermore, SANDAG has also recently adopted the San Diego Re- gional Bicycle Plan (May 2010) (see DEIR page 4.13-9). C. Policy B3.a.1. by adopting a 100 percent Clean Vehicle Re- placement Policy for the City fleet and contracted fleet services (see also Policy CS-1.4). See also Response to "1" above. Further, it is infeasible to require the city to adopt a I00 percent clean vehicle replacement policy. It is necessary for the City to maintain discretion regard- ing its vehicle replacement policy based on economic availability and best available vehicle technology (e.g. fire engines). The City can not commit at this time to a 100 percent replacement policy. 5-85 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR tOMM FNTS AND RFSFONSES 7-15: This comment states that there is a disproportionate number of haz- ardous materials facilities in National City. Comment noted. Existing condi- tions, while an important issue to the City, are not impacts of the proposed project under CEQA. (See Watsonville Pilots Association v. City of Watson- ville (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 1059 ["The FEIR was not required to resolve the [existing] overdraft problem, a feat that was far beyond its scope"]; see also Cherry Valley Pass Acres and Neighbors v. City of Beaumont (201C) 190 Cal.App.4th 316, 118 Ca1.Rptr.3d 182, 201 through 207). 7-16: The comment states that "not all industrial facilities which emit TACs have been properly identified. For example, an EHC walk-through of the Westside in September 2009 found 25 unlisted facilities, compares to the nine listed facilities." Contrary to the assertion in the comment that the DEIR only identified "nine facilities" within National City which emit TACs, the DEIR in fact identified 40 facilities: "According to CARB, there are 40 facilities in National City with TAC emissions. These facilities and their annual TAC emissions are listed in "fable 4.3-5. The total air toxics emissions from all of these facilities are 37 tons per year, or 3 percent of the total TACs in San Diego County. Of the 40 facilities, 33 of them are gas stations, auto body shops, automotive centers, or dry cleaners. Thirty-one of these facilities have less than 0.50 tons per year of toxic emissions. 'Three facilities have air toxics emissions between 0.5 and 1.0 tons per year, five facilities have emissions between 1 and 5 tons per year, and one facility has 16 tons per year of TAC emis- sions" (see DEIR page 4.3-27 and Table 4.3-5). The comment goes on to state that "identification of facilities which contain, emit, or are associated with hazardous substances is likely underestimated in the CPU and DEIR. Thus, the addition of new industrial facilities will com- pound existing impacts and increase chances of exposure of sensitive receptors to hazardous materials." 5-86 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR COMMENTS AND RESFONSES The DF.TR included a thorough discussion of existing hazardous material fa- cilities and impact analysis, including an Environmental Data Resources (EDR) Area Study, Regional Water Quality Control Board database search, and Department of Toxic Substances Control database search, to identify known sites with potential environmental hazards within the project area. Tables 4.7-1 and 4.7-2 on pages 4.7-11-4.7-16 of the Hazards and Hazardous Materials section of the DEIR and Appendix E, Hazardous Materials Sites in National City, list all known sites with potential environmental hazards. However, it is not always possible to identify all sites that contain hazardous materials, as soil testing can be necessary. On some sites, soil testing cannot be performed until above ground structures are removed. The comment does not name any additional facilities which have not been discussed in the DEIR, therefore it is not possible to provide a more detailed response. However, it is important to note that not every facility must be identified in a programmatic analysis. CEQA Guidelines Section 15204(a) states that "CEQA does not require a lead agency to conduct every test or perform all research, study, and experimentation recommended or demanded by commentors." As discussed under CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a), "The description of the environmental setting shall be no longer than is nec- essary to an understanding of the significant effects of the proposed project and its alternatives." Furthermore, creation of new industrial facilities does not necessarily mean that impacts must be significant as suggested in the comment. As discussed on DEIR page 3-41 "The new dwelling units and retail/office and industrial facilities would replace existing buildings." This provides opportunities to clean up existing sites, and replace older outdated facilities with newer facili- ties which conform to modern building codes, newer more stringent safety measures and regulations described in Section 4.7, as well as the proposed policies contained in the General Plan (see Policies S-8.1, S-8.2, and S-8.3). The commenter is referred to the Hazardous Materials impact analyses start- ing on DEIR page 4.7-22 for further details. 5-87 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CO'1M ENTS AND RESPONSES 7-17: This comment suggests that the analysis underestimates the impacts associated with the use, transport, and disposal of hazardous facilities. In ad- dition to General flan policies to reduce risks, the use, transport, and disposal of hazardous materials, is heavily regulated by federal, State, and local regula- tions and policies as described in greater detail in the regulatory discussion in Section 4.7. National City's General Plan does not stand alone from a regula- tory or statutory perspective. Development within the City, must comply with other federal, State, and local regulatory and statutory requirements. These will shape the way development occurs within the City, in addition to the General Plan. (See also City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Unified School District (2CC9) 176 Ca1.App.4th 889, 913, 914 [discussing compliance with Safe School Plan requirements under Education Code Sections 32282 et seq. to help avoid hazardous material impacts]; Sandstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Ca1.App.3d 296, 308 ["compliance [with environmental regula- tions] would indeed avoid significant environmental effects"]; see also CEQA Guidelines Sections 15002(h)(3), 15064(h)(3), and 15130(c).) The commenter suggests that the DEIR dots not address hazardous materials emissions and refers to "Appendix G, VI.c regarding exposure to sensitive receptors at schools." Appendix G, threshold Vl.c refers to unstable soils. However, the DEIR hazardous Chapter notes "Hazardous air quality emis- sions are addressed in Section 4.3 Air Quality."10 Section 4.3 notes that there would be significant and unavoidable impacts associated with air quality. 7-18: This comment notes the overconcentration of industrial facilities and suggests that impacts associated with industrial facilities were underestimated. As stated in Response to Comments 7-16 and 7-17, the DEIR analysis consid- ered a thorough list of known sites. As noted under Response to Comment 7-7, while existing conditions are an important issue for the City, they are not impacts of the proposed project. Discussed under the threshold "Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazard- ous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 1/4-mile of an existing or proposed school." -88 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CONIMFNTS AND R ESPONSES 7-19: This comment notes that additional mitigation measures may he avail- able. Refer to Response to Comments 7-13, 7-14, and 7-15 above. The com- menter further suggests the following revisions: 1. GPU Policies S-7.1 and S-7.2 may be changed to "require" as opposed to merely "promote" use of BACT and may be extended to apply to all industrial facilities, not just City operations: While the City will promote hazardous waste minimization, it will not al- ways be possible to "require" this for both existing and new facilities. Feasi- bility would need to be evaluated on a project -by -project basis and the City would need to be able to demonstrate financial feasibility. This area is heav- ily regulated and in many instances the City is preempted by Federal law. Policies S-7.1 and S-7.2 have been changed to add "where feasible" so as to use BACT to the extent feasible. 2. Periodic review and reevaluation of BACT every few years would mitigate potential impacts: The comment suggests that Best Available control technology discussed in Policy S-7.1 be reviewed "every few years." It is important to note that the contents of a General Plan are governed by Government Code Sections 65300 et seq. The City has provided a number of implementation measures, includ- ing the proposed Land Use Code, however it is not possible to draft every potential ordinance and implementation measure that will be implemented over the lifetime of the project at this time. Government Code 65400 con- templates implementation of a General Plan as an ongoing process which in- cludes an annual report on implementation (see also General Plan Implemen- tation Measure ME-14). The level of detail recommended by the commenter will be considered in future ordinances (as noted under Implementation Measure PT-23), however it is not possible to adopt this level of detail for the full General Plan and complete the project within a "reasonable period of time" (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15364). 7-20: This comment focuses on the 1 lealth and Environmental Justice Ele- ment of the proposed General Plan and is not related to the DEIR. Further- 5-89 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COM MtN S AND RESPONSES more, existing lead based paint is not an impact of the proposed project but is part of baseline conditions (see Response to Comment 7-7 for greater details). The comment further suggests the failure of the DEIR to mention the City's Housing Rehabilitation Program or threat of lead -based paint exposure dur- ing redevelopment. The housing Rehabilitation Program is no longer in existence. Furthermore, exposure to and removal of lead -based paint is gov- erned by federal regulatory requirements. As discussed on DEIR page 3-17, "the proposed project does not stand alone from a regulatory perspective. Development within the City must comply with other federal, State, and local regulations." Existing regulations provide for the safe removal of lead based paint (sec 15 USC §2682; 40 CFR Part 745). Lead based paint removal is required for "[r]enovations in target housing11 or child -occupied facilities..." (40 CFR Part 745.82). This includes the requirement that parties removing lead based paint be properly trained and certified to ensure that the work is performed safely (see 40 CFR Part 745.80).'2 See also California regulations related to lead based paint removal under 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 1532.1. There arc numerous additional lead based paint programs in California.' While the suggestion is not necessary from a CEQA perspective, the sugges- tion regarding the lead based paint ordinance will he forwarded to the deci- sion makers for their consideration. 11 "The term "target housing" means any housing constructed prior to 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless any child who is less than 6 years of age resides or is expected to reside in such housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities) or any 0-bedroom dwelling. In the case of jurisdictions which banned the sale or use of lead -based paint prior to 1978, the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, at the Secretary's discretion, may designate an earlier date." (15 USC § 2681(17)) I' These requirements are summarized by the EPA at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/newsletters/civil/enfalert/leadpaint.pdf 1' See 17 Cal. Code Regs. 33001 et seq., 17 Cal. Code Regs. 35001 et seq., 17 Cal. Code Regs. 37000 et seq., 17 Cal. Code Regs. 38001 et seq., 22 Cal. Code. Regs. 69100 et seq. 390 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CONIMENPS AND F t S P O N S E S 7-21: The comment refers to "inadequacies of the DEIR". This represents the commentor's conclusion based on the preceding comments. Please see the responses to the comments above. The DEIR sections addressing air quality and hazards/hazardous materials comply with CEQA by providing a thor- ough analysis of potential program- and project -level impacts for each signifi- cance threshold, and include feasible mitigation measures where appropriate. 5-9 I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR OMMENTS ANC RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5-92 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COALITION March 10, 201 1 Mr. Brad Raulston City of National City Community Development Department 1243 National City Blvd National City, California 91950 COMMENT LETTER #8 2 K TIONALCITY,CA 1950. B19 4T4Fi221 WW*1NYIBBNMENTALBEBLi1 RE: EHC Recommendations for the National City General Plan Update (GPU) Dear Mr. Raulston: Environmental Health Coalition (EHC) is a 30-year-old nonprofit environmental health and justice organization that works in the San Diego -Tijuana region. A majority of our work is focused on land use, air quality, and respiratory health in the !ow -income communities of color that surround San Diego Bay, including Old Town National City. On behalf of EHC, we applaud National City's leadership and efforts to reduce air pollution by its recent adoption ofa strong Westside Specific Plan and most recently incorporating a Health and Environmental Justice Element (HEJ) as part of the General Plan Update. The HEJ element reflects the City's intention to improve National City's health for ail its residents. There are additional recommendations, however, critical to generating a successful HEJ Element and General Plan Update (GPU). We request that these recommended amendments be adopted in the Final GPU. HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ELEMENT Respiratory Health and Quality EHC requests that the City strengthen its commitment to Environmental Justice by including specific policy commitments that guarantee air quality improvements. The Respiratory Health and Quality policies in the HEJ clement do consider hazardous uses when building new residential uses, schools, and other sensitive uses. Nonetheless, the policy commitments are missing critical scientifically proven details that will ensure people are safe from environmental hazards and toxic threats. California's Environmental Protection Agency {CAL EPA) and the Air Resources Board (CARE) state in the Siting of New Sensitive Land Uses section of the Air Quality Land Use Handbook to, "avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet ofa freeway as well as a 1,000 feet ofa major service and maintenance rail yard, a EMPOWERING PEOPLE. ORGANIZING COMMUNITIES. ACHIEVING JUSTICE. EMPODERAN00 A LA GENiE. ORGANiZANDO A LAS COMUNIDADES. LOGRANDO LA JUSTICIA. 8-1 8-2 distribution center, anda chrome plater"' In addition, our neighboring city, Chula Vista, made a commitment to the air quality of its constituency by including a policy in the General Plan Update that "avoids siting new or re -powered energy generation facilities and other significant hazard air emitters within 1000 feet of a sensitive receiver, or the placement of a sensitive receiver within 1000 feet of a significant hazard emitter."2 We would also like to draw your attention to the mounting number of studies that examine health and safety questions surrounding the location of highways near schools, hospitals, and other places where children, the elderly and vulnerable populations spend large amounts to time. These studies link air pollution near high - traffic areas to cancer, asthma, heart attacks, and low birth weight babies for people who live in nearby communities. Please find attached summaries and citation of 17 peer -reviewed, published studies making this Zink between traffic -related air pollution and increased health risks. Since this General Plan Update offers the opportunity to plan better in the future than we have in the past, we urge the final GPU to amend the following policies and include the following policy changes. Policies: o Current policy Policy HEJ-2.1 Avoid land use conflicts by ensuring residential, public assembly, and sensitive land uses are buffered from industrial land uses, where feasible. • Recommended amendment Prohibit new land use conflicts by ensuring residential, public assembly, and other sensitive land uses are 1000 ft away from industrial land uses. o Current Policy Policy HEJ-2.3 Avoid siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet from the centerline of a freeway, unless such development contributes to smart growth, open space, or transit - oriented goals, in which case the development shall include feasible measures such as separation/setbacks, landscaping, barriers, ventilation systems, air filters/cleaners, and/or other effective measures to minimize potential impacts from air pollution. • Recommended amendment Prohibit siting new sensitive land uses within 500 feet from the centerline of a freeway. Please find attached map. http://www.arb_ca.gov/ch/handbook_pdf http://www.chulavistaca.gov/city_services/dove(opment_services/Planninq_8uild(ng/ PDF/Chapter_09- F nviron me n tai-Part_02-arnend-01. pdf 2 8-2 Cont. 8-3 8-4 8-5 o Current Policy Policy HEJ-2.2 Encourage existing stationary sources of emissions to use feasible measures to minimize emissions that could have potential impacts on air quality and incentivize non -conforming uses to relocate to appropriate industrial zones if currently impacting sensitive land uses. • Recommended amendment Require existing stationary sources of emissions to use best available control technology measures and reevaluate every three years to assess new options for emissions reductions, in order to minimize emissions that could have potential impacts on air quality and incentivize non -conforming uses to relocate to appropriate industrial zones. Lead Based Paint and Other Contaminants in the Home National City is the second oldest city in San Diego County, California. The majority of the city's population is made up of low- and very low-income residents and the majority of its housing is made up of rentals, older and deteriorated housing stock, much of which is owned and managed by absentee landlords. The National City Lead Hazard Control and Healthy Homes Grants were instrumental in protecting children who reside in the at -risk housing. EHC commends the City for establishing the "Lead Code Enforcement Program" which is evidence of their commitment to ongoing lead hazard control efforts in National City beyond the grants. EHC recommends the following policy to strengthens the City's "Lead Code Enforcement Program" and maximize the role of code enforcement in protecting children from lead hazards. o Current Policy Policy HEJ-7.2 Develop a process by which to identify residences with lead based paint hazards, notify residents of the potential hazard, and request landlords; owners to make the housing unit lead -safe. • Recommended amendment Identify lead based paint hazard(s) during regular code enforcement inspections, notify landlords of the hazard(s), and require landlords/owners to make the housing unit lead -safe. If children or grandchildren live or frequently visit the housing unit with lead hazardis), the amount of time given to a landlord/owner to repair should be no more than 60 days. Health and Environmental Justice Element Structure National City is setting a standard in the state of California by adding a Health and Environmental Justice Element. We appreciate the City's leadership to establish a vision grounded in policies specifically dedicated to generate a healthy and safe environment for all the residents. However, the HEJ Element's structure conceals the City's intention through an inconsistent treatment of HEJ Element's structure. 3 8-6 8-7 8-8 The HEJ element lists a set of goals and policies just as other National City GPU elements do. The inconsistency with other Elements is demonstrated through a unique section to the element titled 'Related Policies from Other Elements". For example, policy Safety-8.1 states it will "promote the dean -up and reuse of contaminated sites and prioritize re,rrediation and redevelopment of Brownfield sites within and adjacent to residential and mixed -use areas The policy is part of the Safety Element and is listed within the "Related Policies from Other Elements" in the HEJ Element instead being included in the HEJ Element. The section is intended to mention policies from other elements related to health and environmental justice. Policies are commonly repeated throughout the document, which creates consistency between elements. Nonetheless, only the HEJ Element has a "Related Policies from Other Elements" section. The State Guidance section on General Plan Basics explains that "all elements of the general plan have equal legal status,`] therefore, the HEJ Element should be treated equally. o EHC recommends the policies under the "Related Policies from Other Elements" section are integrated into the HEJ Element and labeled accordingly. CONSERVATION AND SUSTAINABILITY ELEMENT Energy (Electricity and Natural Gas) Finally, a critical way that the City and the community can reduce its impacts on public health and the environment is to reduce its carbon footprint. By reducing energy use through conservation and energy efficiency, as well as maximizing the amount of energy generated from local, clean resources such as solar, combined heat and power and fuel cells, National City can achieve cleaner air, create new jobs, and revitalize neighborhoods. Reaching these goals also avoids the need to build dirty energy power resources in our neighborhoods. The City should commit to a plan that achieves measurable goals using the technologies and actions listed. We recommend the following goal and policy changes to meet conservation and sustainability in National City. o Current Goal Goaf CS-6 Energy utilities sufficient to meet existing and future demand, and facilities and maintenance practices that are efficient and sensitive to the natural and urban landscape. • Recommended amendment Energy utilities sufficient to meet existing and future demand, and facilities and maintenance practices that achieve 1990 emissions by 2020 and 80% below 1990 ghg emissions by 2050. 3 http://www opr.ca.gov/planning/publications/General_Plan_Guideitnes_2003.pdf 4 8-8 cont. 8-9 8-10 o New Goal Meet 50% of citywide electricity needs with clean energy by 2020. o Current Policy Policy CS-7.3 Consistent with the California Public Utilities Commission's California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, strive to achieve zero net energy use for new residential development by 2020 and zero net energy use for new commercial development by 2030. • Recommended amendment Consistent with the California Public Utilities Commission's California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, achieve zero net energy use for new residential development by 2020 and zero net energy use for new commercial development by 2030. o Policy CS-7.4 Explore programs to encourage load shifting to off peak hours and explore demand response solutions. • Recommended amendment Develop a plan that will result in peak Toad shifting and demand response action that will reduce loads on the grid of at least 50% by implementing the State of California's preferred loading order for energy use. o Current Policy Policy CS-7.5 Promote availability of a variety of tools and services for implementing energy conservation and renewable energy generation, including financing districts, energy auditing, and energy efficiency retrofit services to all residents and business owners. • Recommended amendment Achieve 20% reduction in home energy use by 2015: 40% reduction by 2020. o Current Policy Policy CS-7.7 Encourage LEED certification for all new municipal, commercial, and industrial buildings in the city. • Recommended amendment Require LEED Gold or equivalent for all city new or significantly remodeled buildings and require LEED Silver or equivalent for new significantly remodels of private sector building construction. 5 8-12 8-13 8-14 8-15 Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this important document. We look forward to continue working with you. Sincerely, Georgette Gomez, Director Carolina Martinez, Policy Advocate Toxic Free Neighborhoods Campaign Toxic Free Neighborhoods Campaign CC: Mayor, Ron Morrison Vice Mayor, Alejandra Sotelo-Solis Council Member, Luis Natividad Council Member, Mona Rios Council Member, Rosalie Zarate City Manager, Chris Zapata Principal Planner, Raymond Pe v CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONF Letter 8: Georgette Gomez and Carolina Martinez, Environmental Health Coalition, March 10, 2011. The following are responses to comments received on the General Plan Up- date during public review and do not in all cases pertain to the Environmental Impact Report. Please note that CEQA only requires the City to draft re- sponses to comments on significant environmental issues, not planning issues (CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(c) and 15204(a)). 8-1: This comment introduces EIIC and applauds the City's leadership and efforts to reduce air pollution through the Westside Specific Plan and the I Iealth and Environmental Justice (HEJ) Element. It states that EHC still has additional recommendations for the HEJ Element that should be incorpo- rated into the final document. This comment is noted and no additional re- sponse is required. 8-2: This comment refers to specific policy commitments that guarantee air quality improvements and specify scientifically proven details regarding the HEJ Element. See Response to Comments 7-13 and 7-14 above. 8-3: This comment draws attention to the mounting number of studies that examine the effects of highways on sensitive receptors and link air pollution associated with high traffic areas to cancer, asthma, heart attacks, and low birth weight babies. The DEIR acknowledges the health effects associated with air pollutants (see DEIR pages 4.3-10 through 4.3-15). 8-4: This comment recommends changes to the policy language for HEJ-2.1. The existing policy is misquoted in the comment letter. The existing policy HEJ-2.1 is written as "Avoid land use conflicts by ensuring residential, public assembly, and other sensitive land uses are adequately buffered from indus- trial land uses that may pose a threat to human health, where feasible." See Response to Comment 7-14 above. Further, the City is concerned that there may be some instances in which it is not possible to locate industrial and sen- sitive land uses at least 1,000 feet apart. In addition, the City recognizes that 5 99 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES some industrial uses are clean, non-polluting facilities. Therefore, HEJ-2.1 has not been changed. 8-5: This comment recommends changes to the policy language for HEJ-2.3. See Response to Comment 7-14 above. 8-6: This comment recommends changes to policy HEJ-2.2. I-IEJ-2.2 states, "Encourage existing stationary sources of emissions to use feasible measures to minimize emissions that could have potential impacts on air quality and incentivize non -conforming uses to relocate to appropriate industrial zones if currently impacting sensitive land uses." Please see Response to Comment 7- 19. 8-7: This comment acknowledges that the majority of the city's population is made up of low and very -low income residents with older, deteriorated hous- ing stock that is at risk of containing lead based paint hazards. EHC com- mends the City for establishing the Lead Code Enforcement Program and recommends strengthening policy HEJ-7.2. See Response to Comment 7-20 above. 8-8: This comment appreciates the City's leadership in establishing policies dedicated to generating a healthy and safe environment, but questions the inconsistent treatment of the structure of the Health and Environmental Jus- tice (I IEJ) Element. Please see Response to Comment 7-4 which addresses this issue. 8-9: This comment emphasizes the need to reduce energy use through conser- vation and energy efficiency as well as maximize the amount of energy gener- ated from local, clear resources such as solar, combined heat and power, and fuel cells. The City supports and encourages energy conservation and alterna- tive energy sources and the goals and policies in the General Plan identify this support. The DE1R discusses energy conservation and renewable energy gen- eration in both Chapters 4.14 and 4.15. The suggested revisions to the Gen- 5- WO CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENIS AND RESFCNSLS eral Plan are discussed in Response to Comments 8-10 through 8-15. These suggestions will be forwarded to the decision makers for their consideration. 8-10: The comment suggests the following revisions to Goal CS-6: • Amend Goal CS-6: Energy utilities sufficient to meet existing and future demand, and facilities and maintenance practices that are -efficient and jensitive to the natural and --urban landscape achieve 199C emissions by 2020 and 80% below 1990 ghg emissions by 205C. In addition, the Climate Action Plan is part of the proposed project and states on page 3-2: "National City has adopted a reduction target of 15 percent below 2005/2006 baseline emission levels by the year 2020 [equivalent to 1990 levels by 2020], with additional reductions by the year 2033, for both community -wide and government operations." As discussed on DEIR page 3-17, `the proposed project does not stand alone from a regulatory perspective. Development within the City must comply with other federal, State, and local regulations." The DEIR notes that the suggested GI IG reduction targets already exist through AB32 and Executive Order S-3-05. It is therefore not necessary to repeat these requirements in this goal in the General Plan. Furthermore, the existing goal is intended to be broader than the recom- mended revision. Specific targets should not be included in a General Plan goal. Desired targets are identified in Section 5 of the General Plan (Indica- tors). This section lists several ways that the City can measure its progress towards reaching its goals and policies. Measuring greenhouse gas emissions is one of the indicators and future emission inventories will allow the City to identify if emissions targets will be met. CEQA only requires a reduction in impacts in comparison to existing condi- tions. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a).) The suggested revisions are 5-101 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR CO M MENT5 AND RCS PONSES therefore not necessary from a CEQA perspective as existing conditions are beyond the scope of the EIR to fix (see Watsonville Pilots Associuti.on v. City of Watsonville (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 1059). 8-11: The comment suggests the following new Goal: • New Goal: Meet 30% of citywide electricity needs with clean energy by 2021 As noted on DEIR page 4.14-103 "In the third quarter of 2010 SDG&E pro- vided 10.5% of its electricity from renewables." This figure was recently up- dated after the publication of the DEIR; SDG&E produced 11.9% of their electricity from renewable energy sources in 2010 (18% average statewide)." As also noted on DEIR page 4.15-6 the State has already enacted a renewable portfolio requirement. The enacting statutes were recently amended to re- quire 33% of electricity generation from retail sales to be produced from re- newable sources by 2020 (see Senate Bill X1 2 [2011]). Further, the City has limited control over how energy is produced for the City. As noted in the previous response, CEQA only requires a reduction in im- pacts in comparison to existing conditions. (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125(a).) The suggested revisions are therefore not necessary from a CEQA perspective as existing conditions are beyond the scope of the EIR to fix (see Watsonville Pilots Association v. City of Watsonville (2010) 183 Cal. App. 4th 1059). 8-12: The comment suggests the following revisions to Policy CS-7.3: • Amend Policy CS-7.3: Policy CS-7.3: Consistent with the California Public Utilities Commission's California Long Term Energy Efficiency Strategic Plan, strive to achieve zero net energy use for new residential development by 2020 and zero net energy use for new commercial devel- opment by 2030. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Renewables/index.htm 5-102 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR I O M M E N I S AND RFPONSFS As noted in Response to Comment 8-10, the Climate Action Plan already contains a policy which calls for the reduction of GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 (i.e. below baseline levels). Furthermore, and EIR is to address the impacts based upon the whole of the project, not individual components (such as residences and commercial space). (See Big Rock Mesas Prop. Owners Ass'n v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 73 Ca1.App.3d 218, 277; see also No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1987) 196 Ca1.App.3d 223, 235 {analysis required for the project as a whole, not the various components thereof.].) Furthermore, it may also not be possible to ensure that every individual resi- dential project or commercial project has a zero net energy use. For example, it may not always he economically feasible to require affordable housing to fully offset their energy consumption. Similarly, it may not be possible to require 100% offset of energy use for new commercial development, which will depend upon the specific nature of the project and parcel. The suggested revision would provide insufficient flexibility, to account for the needs of spe- cific projects at the time they are proposed. 8-13: The comment recommends the following revisions to Policy CS-7.4: ♦ Amend Policy CS-7.4: Explore programs to encourage load -shifting to off peak hours and explore demand resp nsc s luti ns. Develop a plan that will result in peak load shifting and demand response action that will reduce loads on the grid of at least 50% by implementing the State of California's preferred loading order for energy use. The language proposed in the draft General Plan addresses shifting peak load electricity demand. However the policy as currently proposed in the com- ment simply refers to reducing "loads on the grid" by 50% rather than peak load. Furthermore, the comment does not explain how such a plan could be implemented by the City. 5-103 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMNTS ANC RESPONSPS The "load order" discussed in the comment refers to energy efficiency, de- mand response, renewable, and distributed generation.t5 As discussed in the DEIR and the previous response to comments, many of these suggestions are already being implemented through existing programs. For example, there are numerous programs to increase energy efficiency and renewables, as dis- cussed in DEIR chapters 4.14 and 4.15 (including energy efficient building standards). However, the City has limited abilities to control peak electricity demand; most of the measures proposed by the City are more passive in nature, as dis- cussed in the DEIR (i.e. constructing efficient buildings). A majority of thc tools necessary to control peak load demand are actively controlled by utility companies, thc California Public Utilities Commission, and the California Energy Commission. For example, the utility companies control "demand response" by implementing programs in which the utility, can shut off specific equipment to an agreed upon level, cycling air conditioning, or use dynamic pricing and demand bidding during periods of peak electricity load. The City does not have control over such contracts or the equipment. Furthermore, peak load demand is not something that should be as mechani- cally assigned as suggested in the comment (i.e. 50%). The determination of what percentage to reduce peak load is dependent upon a number of factors that are ultimately determined by the utility companies and other govern- mental agencies. In some instances the utility companies may seek to in- crease/shift demand depending upon the source of electricity and pricing. Such a policy could interfere with these considerations. California Energy Commission, Implementing California's Loading Order for Electricity Resources, July 2005. Available at: http://www.energy. ca.gov/2005publi ca ti on s% CEC-400-2005-043/CEC-400-2005- 043.PDF 5-10'1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES 8-14: This comment suggests the following amendment to policy CS-7.5: • Policy CS-7.5: Promote availability of a variety f tools and services for implementing energy conservation and renewable energy gener ti n--in- cluding financing districts, cncrgy auditing, and energy -efficiency retrofit .;ervices to all residents and business owners. Achieve 20% reduction in home energy use by 2015; 40% reduction by 2020. Please see Response to Comment 8-10 and 8-11. As noted in those responses existing conditions (and existing building) arc beyond the scope of the EIR to fix. Please however note that the Climate Action Plan contains a number of policies to decrease energy demand from existing buildings (see Climate Ac- tion Plan page 4-2). 8-15: This comment suggests the following amendment to Policy CS-7.7: • Policy CS-7.7: Encourage LEED certification for all new municipal, c mmercial, and industrial buildings in the city.Require LEED Gold or equivalent for all city new or significantly remodeled buildings and re- quire LEED Silver or equivalent for new significantly remodels of private sector building construction. The City supports the concept of energy efficiency and LEED certification (or equivalent) for new development as evidenced by General Plan Policy CS- 7.7 (Climate Action Plan A1.b.2, Bl.a.3). However, a policy to require all new public buildings to meet LEED standards is not appropriate at the pro- grammatic level and does not retain the flexibility needed to address the vari- ety of project specific differences that will arise under the General Plan. The City supports the full spectrum of LEED certification programs and under- stands that individual projects will conform to their own unique set of issues (including financial, technological) to ensure that the appropriate degree of energy efficiency design is incorporated into individual building construction. The commenter is referred to DEIR Chapters 4.14 and 4.15 for more detailed discussion energy efficiency requirements for existing and proposed facilities. 5-105 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COiMFN 1 S AND RFS?ONSFS This page intentionally left blank. 5 106 Date: City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Comments: COMMENT LETTER #9 PUBLIC COMMENTS ❑ Draft Environmental Impact Report ❑ Draft General Plan ❑ Draft Climate Action Plan ❑ Draft Land Use Code ❑ Draft Downtown Specific Plan Amendment ❑ Other: L_i2c(A0 /fe* 4./1 5r4C4,/. Name: Address: Phone: Email: L/lI9,r Please submit comments by March 10, 2011. (-4-2e ,4i, Ave__ nAe- r ff'L jy Comments may also be submitted via email: rpe@nationalcityca.gov 9-1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR CC M MENTS AND RFSPONSFS This page intentionally left blank. 5-I08 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR CCNIMENTS AND RESPONSES Letter 9: Geoffrey Schrolk, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 9-1: This comment provides a number of comments on issues not related to the Comprehensive Land Use Update, DEIR, or environmental issues. No additional response is required (sec CEQA Guidelines Sections 15088(c) and 15204(a)). The suggestions will however be forwarded to the decision makers for their consideration. 5-109 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5-II0 Date: — City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Comments: COMMENT LETTER #10 PUBLIC COMMENTS ❑ Draft Environmental Impact Report ❑ Draft General Plan ❑ Draft Climate Action Plan 0 Draft Land Use Code ❑ Draft Downtown Specific Plan Amendment ❑ Other: C A- elmoo_ vc-OF t-t-e.r,,,,You.1 (go Name: i -t'U Address: 'C't )� /t Phone: 6 Email: Please submit comments by March 10, 2011. Comments may also be submitted via email: rpe@nationalcityca.gov 10-1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMNIFNIS AND N t S F U N S t S This page intentionally left blank. S-I 12 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMES AND RESPONSES Letter 10: Mick Heard, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 10-1: The comment does not address the adequacy of the DEIR or environ- mental issues. No additional response is required. 5-113 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSE S This page inlenlionally Left blank. 3 114 S Date: 4• 5 // City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Comments: COMMENT LETTER #11 PUBLIC COMMENTS ❑ Draft Environmental Impact Report ❑ Draft General Plan ❑ Draft Climate Action Plan ❑ Draft Land Use Code ❑ Draft Downtown Specific Plan Amendment ❑ Other: i / L11(4- ji2v #z -11 w/TH 81* x /N fr 1-LK/NG IIN& -n To0 TLiC No meb 14 N Mlicrl wKjMM 114-rat /4I , . CL.e 7KLG 5Wovc6 4rfi&t To fee-. cwt. comoi L!117t ti Name: 00-0-115 Address: Phone: Email: (°\ 9913 0307 Please submit comments by March 10, 2011. Comments may also be submitted via email: rpe nationa]cityca.gov CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RESPONSES This page intentionally left blank. 5-116 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RES 'O NS CS Letter 11: Dennis Lexline, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 11-1: This comment provides a number of comments on the Draft General Plan, and not the DE1R or related environmental issues. No additional re- sponse is required (see CEQA Guidelines Section 15088(c) and 15204(a)). 5 117 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR C O M M E N T S AND RSSPONSES ibis page intentionally left blank. 5-118 COMMENT LETTER #12 U OtM9y— P 61)4vu1-e Nods-vid cA -✓1 ( vtn44 14Ae- - e 7 Si 2.011 (AwtAcl,14) Nywl LA tA WOWA. d4 (L tn41 aA AUs `OL_ &v1W U soS Ce.c<i 0 S 5 oM-es . peso N0 £vl(e- (AAAv\'1I es1eU-i (nv14il4 . Noso/Yos ksweiwws . °, al 1 vtot l gfrbto., otA.a i 214'i eSPQ r tyi r iW n O 5 00 i71PS USos itiAmStriade3 ,, e 'V \Jwa-O Iles • 1000 Uw\a> V,QS 0-e US<DS pec:010„os y w�OS WivD1914 Translation: Leonor, National City Resident Feb. 3, 2011, comment, camadro gym The City says that there needs to be distance between residences, schools, churches, hospitals and other sensitive uses. But they dont say how much distance specifically. We want, in the Plan specifically, there to be a distance of: • 500 feet between Tight industrial and sensitive uses • 1,000 feet between heavy industrial and sensitive uses 12-1 12-1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND R L S P O N S L S This page intentionally left blank. 5-120 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL ER COVMFNTS AND RESFCNSS Letter 12: Leonor, National City Resident, March 2, 2011. 12-1: Please see Response to Comments 7-13 and 7-14 above. 5-121 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR COMMENTS AND RFSPO NS FS 5-i22 6 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This chapter provides a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update in combi- nation with the annual report required by Government Code 65400 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(b)). The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure the implementation of mitigation measures identified as part of the environ- mental review for the project. The MMRP includes the following informa- tion: • A list of mitigation measures; • The party responsible for implementing the mitigation measures; • The timing for implementation of the mitigation measure; • The agency responsible for monitoring the implementation; and • The monitoring action and frequency. The City of National City must adopt this MMRP, or an equally effective program, if it approves the Comprehensive Land Use Update with the mitiga- tion measures that were adopted or made conditions of project approval. 6-I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR NITIGATION ,IC N ITC RI N G ANU) REPORTING ,ROG RA M ABLE 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Party Responsible Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Measures for Implementation Timing Monitoring Action Frequency Air Quality AQ-1: The proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update in- cludes numerous policies aimed at reducing vehicle travel through land use planning, encouraging alternatives modes of transportation and use of project level review to reduce air pollutant emissions from vehicle travel. Development Services Department Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review City of National City Verification of Ongoing policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures. AQ-2a: Dust Suppression. The following enhanced dust Development Services Depart - control measures shall be required by the City as part of the ment project entitlement process in order to control fugitive dust emissions during construction and shall be incorporated into Title 9, Health and Sanitation, of the Municipal Code. These measures are in addition to SDAPCD regulatory requirements that apply to construction projects. • Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph. • Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to pre- vent silt runoff to public roadways. ♦ Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possi- ble. • Limit access to the construction sites, so tracking of mud or dirt on to public roadways can be prevented. If neces- sary, use wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off the tires or tracks of all trucks and equipment leaving the site. Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instan- taneous gusts) exceed 20 mph or dust clouds cannot be pre- vented from extending beyond the site, The C:ity'sMunici- pal Code will be revised within 24 months (Condition of approval for interim applicable projects prior to adoption of the ordinance.) City of National City Draft and adopt ordinance to amend the City's Municipal Code Once 6-2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR N G A 1O K MONITORING AND R-'ORTII'. G PROGRAV I AB'_E 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures AQ-2b: Exhaust Emission Controls. Projects that have significant construction period exhaust emissions shall reduce fleet average emission rates. Developers or contractors shall provide a plan for approval by the City or SDAPCD demon- strating that the heavy-duty (>50 horsepower) off -road vehi- cles to be used in the construction project for more than an accumulated 40 hours, including owned, leased and subcon- tractor vehicles, will achieve emission standards similar co in - use equipment that meets CARE certified Tier II standards. AQ-3: The proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update in- cludes numerous policies aimed at reducing vehicle travel through land use planning, encouraging alternatives modes of transportation and use of project level review to reduce air pollutant emissions from vehicle travel. Party Responsible for Implementation Development Services Depart- ment Development Services Department Implementation Timing The City's Munici- pal Code will be revised within 24 months (Condition of approval for interim applicable projects prior to adoption of the ordinance.) Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City City of National City '-Monitoring Action Draft and adopt ordinance to amend the City's Municipal Code Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures Monitoring Frequency Once Once AQ-4: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the 'Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-34 through 4.3-41 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. Development Services Department AQ-5: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-34 through 4.3-41 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. Development Services Department Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures Once Ongoing and dur- ing suhsequent project -level CEQA review Biological Resources City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures Once 6-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGA IC P.I MON TAN F 6- I O R I R 6 AND R E P C R- I N G PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BTO-1: In order to reduce or a -void impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migra- tory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not he permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding sea- son, defined as from January 15`" to August 31r of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory California gnat - catcher. In order to determine presence/absence of California gnatcatchers, protocol surveys of suitable areas of habitat (DCSS) on -site are required. These must be completed by an approved biologist in possession of a Section 10(a) Recovery Permit for this species. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting sur- vey of all areas within 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Development Services Department Monitoring Action Perform site in- spections, review protocol survey reports, and pre - construction sur- vey reports to verify compliance; submit pre - construction sur- vey report to City of National City, CDFG, and U$FWS for con- currence with conclusions and recommendations; submit periodic reports as re- quired. If active nests are found, submit periodic monitoring re- ports. Monitoring Frequency Once or if nesting birds found, peri- odic monitor- ing until fledglings have left the nest BIO-2: Impacts to DCSS shall require mitigation at a mini- mum 2:1 ratio. Therefore, impacts to 1.2 acres of DCSS will require 2.4 acres of mitigation. This mitigation could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration in the Butterfly Garden and/or other areas of the site. In order for on -site habitat creation and restoration to be acceptable as DCSS City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for I,as Palmas Park and Facilities Vi- sion Concept Plan City of National City - Submit Revegeta- tion Plan to City of National City, CDFG and USFNS for ap- proval, review; Periodically, as defined in the Revegeta- tion Plan 5-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MI - IGA I ION MONITORIR G AND 4EPORTI G PROGRAM 1 ABLE 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures mitigation, these activities would need to occur pursuant to a City and resource agencies (CDFG, USFWS) approved Revegetation Plan. The Revegetation Plan would be imple- mented by the City and would require a methodology for how to establish DCSS in that area. The Revegetation Plan would be required to comply with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from January 13° to August 31of each year. Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency projects review periodic revegetation plan reports; perform site inspections to verify compliance 6-5 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR v ITI C AT I O rl 'h C N TO RING ANC; RE ORTIr. C : RO GRAM TAN F 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-3: Impacts to the DFWW shall require mitigation at a mininutm 3:1 ratio in the following manner: at least 1:1 shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. For example, impacts to O.R acre of DFWW would require 2.4 acres of mitigation, Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on - site, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the on -site drainage. It should he noted that if these habitat restoration activities would result in any significant impacts, these impacts would he required to he analyzed and mitigated. Significant impacts associated with habitat restoration activities could include dredging in jurisdictional waters or wetlands, the re- moval of native vegetation, noise impacts to native wildlife during site preparation. In order for habitat restoration to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be sub- ject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitiga- tion Plan. Such a plan would be implemented by the City and it would specify methodology for habitat creation and restora- tion. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 2.4 acre -credits of FWW in an approved mitiga- tion bank. Regulatory Agencies (USAGE, CDFG, KWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or offsite res- toration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan projects Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for construction of Las Palmas Park and facilities Vision Concept Plan Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Monitoring Action Submit Wetland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USAGE, CDFG, and RW'QCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion, submit re- port verifying acquisition of approved mitiga- tion bank credits. Monitoring Frequency' Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation bank credits for offsite mitiga- tion. 6-6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR M I IGATI C N MO NI-O RI:JG AND -,ORT NC; PR OGRA M 7 ,4ELE 6-I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-4: Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as Non -Vegetated Channel (NVC) located in the middle of the existing golf course on the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site„ generally require mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this typically must consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restora- tion/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.1-acre of NVC would require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the on -site drainage. In order for these activities to be acceptahie as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency - approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0_3 acre -credits of NVC in an approved mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agen- cies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or off -site restoration, although on -sire mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan projects. BIO-5: Impacts to Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (DSCSM) , within Paradise Creek in the southern portion of the Kimball Park Master Plan site, require mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. "therefore, impacts to 0.1-acre of DSCSM shall require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via the res- toration of Paradise Creek, including the daylighting of the City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan projects. Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for construction of for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vi- sion Concept Plan projects. Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Monitoring Action SubmitWetland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USAGE, CDPG, and RWQCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion, submit re- port verifying acquistion of ap- proved mitigation bank credits. Monitoring Frequency' Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Ilan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation hank credits for offsite mitiga- tion. Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits City of National City Submit Wetland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USAGE, CDPG, and RWQCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation bank 6-/ CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR ^I IGA I ION MONITORING 4N D P.EPO RTI N G P ROCRP M TABLE o-I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures portion of the creek that is currently underground. The pro- ject's current conceptual design shows approximately 3.9 acres as being available for Paradise Creek improvements. In order for these improvements to be acceptable as wetlands mitiga- tion, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of C,9 acre - credits of SCSM in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) typi- cally allow applicants to propose either on- or offsite restora- tion, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion- submit re- port verifying acquisition of approved mitiga- tion bank credits. Monitoring Frequency credits for offsite mitiga- ti on. 6-8 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR M I T I G A T I C N MONJOR I N G AND REPORT G PR J r_,F.%.. M TPe_[ 6 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-6: Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as DFWW located within Paradise Creek on the Kimball Park Master Plan site„ require mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3- acre of DFWW shall require 0.9-acre of mitigation. Mitiga- tion for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site. The project site has approximately 3.9 acres available for Paradise Creek improvements. In order for these improve- ments to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0.3 acre -credits of FWW in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USACE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow appli- cants to propose either on- or off -site restoration, although on - site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not avail- able, off -site mitigation within the same drainage basin is re- quired. 1'arty Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Kimball Park Mas- ter Plan Implementation Tuning Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City/CDFG Monitoring Action Submit Weiland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USACE, CDFG, and RWQCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion, submit re- port verifying acquisition of approved mitiga- tion hank credits. Monitoring Frequency Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation bank credits for offsite mitiga- tion. 6-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR M TIGi.TIG vNONIORI N G ANDRCPO RTI N G PRORRR TAPir 6- MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures 11TO-7: Because the proposed Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project will impact state wetlands and State and federal "waters," it may be necessary to obtain cer- tain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project ap- proval. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evi- dence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Strearnbed Altera- tion Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for construction of for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vi- sion Concept Plan projects. Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Monitoring Action Provide copies of CWA 404/401 and/or Fish and Game Code 1600 permits, or proof that such permits are not required Monitoring Frequency Once prior to issuance of each demoli- tion, grading or building permit. BIO-8: (a) Mitigation for wetland impacts associated with improve- ments to Kimball Park will require a 1:1 ratio of wetlands creation and 2:1 ratio of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3 acre of DFWW would require 0.9 acre of mitigation and impacts to 0.1 acre of DSCSM would require 0.3 acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur onsite, via the restoration of Para- dise Creek or offsite through contribution to an approved mitigation bank. Because the proposed Kimball Park Master Plan project will impact State wetlands and State and federal "waters," it will likely be necessary to obtain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project implementation. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notifi- cation of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notifica- City of National City/Project Developer for Kimball Park Mas- ter Plan Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for Kimball Park Master Plan City of National City (a) Provide copies of CWA 404/401 and/or Fish and Game Code 1600 permits, or proof that such permits are not required (b) Perform peri- odic site inspec- tions to verify compliance; sub- mit preconstruc- tion survey re- ports to City, CDFG and USFWS for con- currence with (a)Once for permits or evidence that per- mits are not re- quiredi and (b) If nest- ing birds found, pe- riodic monitoring until fledg- lings have left the nest 6-10 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL FIR MITIGf-1C MONITORING AND RFPCRTING PROGRAM TABLE 6-I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures Lion is not required. Also required prior co project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has ob- tained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. (b) In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 Feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be per- mitted during the spring/summer song bird breeding season, defined as from January 15th to August 31st of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting survey of all areas within 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wild- life agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and rec- ommendations. Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency conclusions and recommendations; if active nests are present, submit periodic monitor- ing reports 6- I I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR V ITI G A TI O rJ MONITORING AND RE,ORTI IN G FROGRA V TABLE 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures Ilazards and Hazardous Materials Party Responsible for Implementation HAZ-1: Implementation of a new General Plan Policy S-8.4 shall require proposed development to determine the applica- bility of preparing a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP), stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan, (SUSWMP), Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP), stormwater Best Management Practices, and additional site - specific assessment including research, file reviews, and or Phase I Environmental Assessments. Hydrology and Water Quality City of National City Implementation Timing Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency Concurrent with Development Services project approval Department Verification of policy implemen- tation. Once HYDRO-1: National City shall incorporate into its General Plan Policy CS-5.3 to require the City to regularly assess the adequacy of its storm sewer system to accommodate 100-year storm tows and develop and implement a prioritized plan to address identified capacity deficiencies to the MEP. HYDRO-2a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydro- logical study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surround- ing area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to ac- commodate 100-ycar flood flows on site. Measures to accom- modate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPS such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. I IYDRO-2b: National City, shall incorporate feasible meas- ures identified in the detailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base hood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. City of National City Project Developer for Senior Village Expansion Concurrent with Development Services project approval Department During project Development Services review, prior to Department issuance of demoli- tion, grading, or building permits for the Senior Vil- lage Expansion Verification of policy implemen- tation. Once Undertake de- tailed hydrological study to assess effects of proposed development on base hood eleva- tions; arid perform periodic site in- spections to verify implementation of any required measures (BMPs) Once prior to issuance of demolition, During con- struction period 6-12 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION] MONITORING AND REPOT — I N G P C G R .. M TABIF 6-I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Party Responsible Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Measures for Implementation Timing Monitoring Action Frequency from the hydro- logical study. HYDRO-3a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydro- logical study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surround- ing area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to ac- commodate 100-year flood flows on site. Measures to ac- commodate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPS such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. HYDRO-3b: National City shall incorporate feasible meas- ures identified in the derailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. Land Use Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Con- cept Plan During project Development Services review, prior to Department issuance of demoli- tion, grading, or building permits Perform periodic site inspections to verify compliance During con- struction period LU-1: The inclusion of policies to the General Plan related to development review would reduce impacts associated with conflicts with the MSCP in the vicinity of the Planning area. The addition of Policy OS-2.7 would ensure that potential impacts to biological resources are carefully evaluated prior to approval of development projects. The addition of Policy OS- 2.8 would ensure that development is consistent with all fed- eral, State and regional regulations for habitat and species pro- tection. City of National City Concurrent with Development Services project approval Department Verification of policy implemen- tation. Noise Once NOI-1: Implement Construction Noise Reduction Measures. Title 12 of the Municipal Code shall be amended to include the following standard construction City of National City 6-13 The City's Munici- pal Code will be revised within 24 Development Services Department Draft and adopt ordinance to amend the City's Once CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR M C N I TO AING AND REPORTING PRO GRAM AISLE 6-I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Party Responsible Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Measures for Implementation Timing Monitoring Action Frequency noise reduction measures. months (Condition Municipal Code ♦ Equipment Sound Attenuation. All noise -producing of approval for construction equipment and vehicles using internal interim applicable combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers, air- projects prior to inlet silencers where appropriate, and any other shrouds, adoption of the shields, or other noise -reducing features in good operat- ordinance.) ing condition that meet or exceed original factory speci- fication. Mobile or fixed "package" equipment (e.g. arc welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readily available for that type of equipment. • Use of Electrical Equipment. Electrically powered equip- ment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal com- bustion powered equipment, where feasible. • Distance from Sensitive Receptors. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and mainte- nance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise -sensitive receptors. ♦ Construction Traffic Speeds. Construction site and access road speed limits shall be established and enforced during the construction period. • Use of Noise -Producing Signals. The use of noise produc- ing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. • Use of Public Address or Music Systems. No project - related public address or music system shall he audible at any adjacent sensitive receptor. • Noise Complaint Process. The on -site construction super- visor shall have the responsibility and authority to receive and resolve noise complaints. A clear appeal process to the 6-14 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR VLF NON ICRING AND PFPORTINC TABLE 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures owner shall be established prior to construction com- mencement that will allow for resolution of noise problems that cannot be immediately solved by the site supervisor. Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency NOISE-2: Implementation of new General Plan Policy NN- Development Services Depart- Prior to projec 1.10 would call for a study to demonstrate that ground borne meat approval vibration issues associated with rail operations are adequately addressed for new development within 100 feet from the cen- terline of the railroad tracks. City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation. NOISE-3: Detailed "Crack Survey." Prior to approval of final site design, any project proponent that would propose driving pilings or performing an action that could cause substantial vibrations shall perform a detailed "crack survey" before the startup of construction activities. If pile driving would be the source of these vibrations, pre foundation pile holes should be pre -drilled to the extent feasible to minimize the number of hammer strikes required to seat the pile. The survey may be done by photographs, videotape, or visual inventory, and should include inside as well as outside locations. All existing cracks and walls, floors, driveways, etc., should be docu- mented with sufficient detail for comparison after construc- tion to determine whether actual vibration damage has oc- curred. If damage is found, the project application would be required to compensate for such damages. Transportation and Circulation Development Services Depart- ment The City's Mu- nicipal Code will be revised within 24 months (Condi- tion of approval for interim applicable projects prior to adoption of the ordinance. City of National City Draft and adopt ordinance to amend the City's Municipal Code Once Once 6-IS CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGA - ION ON ITO t. REPO RTI N G TABLE 6- 1 P R O C P. A `1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures TRANS -I: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.13-12, and 4.13-6 through 4.3-10, and pages 4.13-46 through 4.13-69, as modified in the Final EIR. Party Responsible for Implementation Development Services Department Implementation Timing Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Monitoring Action Verification of policy implemen- tation and project- soecific mitigation measures. Monitoring Frequency Ongoing TRANS-2: No mitigation required. As part of the County of San Diego's Draft General Plan Update, Sweetwater Road is planned as a four -lane facility in 2030. This would reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level in 2030. Between Na- tional City city limits (Plaza Bonita Center Way) and Wil- low Street has been identified as a roadway segment where LOS E or F is acceptable, since adding travel lanes would result in adverse environmental impacts. As part of ongoing multi -jurisdictional programs such as Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TSLP), the cities of Na- tional City and Chula Vista and Caimans will continue to implement coordinated traffic signal timing along the Na- tional City Boulevard/Broadway Avenue corridor to im- prove traffic flow and progression. These implementation measures will ensure that impacts associated with increased congestion levels are less than significant. TRANS-3: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.13-12, and 4.13-6 through 4.3-10, and pages 4.13-69 through 4.13-78, as modified in the Final EIR. Development Services Department Ongoing City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation Ongoing Development Services Department Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review City of National City Verification of Ongoing policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures. 6-I6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVELAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR M TI G HTI O N M O N ITC RI NG AND RCPDRTIis G PRO GRAM F 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Party Responsible Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Measures for Implementation Timing Monitoring Action Frequency Utilities and Service Systems UTILS-1: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described on DEIR pages 4.14-36 through 4.14-40, 4.14-45 through 4.14-46, as modified in the Final EIR. Development Services Ongoing and dur- Departmenc ing subsequent project -level CEQA review UTILS-2: Adopt a new General Plan policy to require the City of National City shall conduct hydraulic modeling analy- sis to assess the impacts of the additional wastewater that would he generated with implementation of the Regulatory Changes and revise or re -prioritize the Recommended Capital Improvement Program contained in the SSMP as necessary in order to ensure that the City's wastewater collection system would have sufficient capacity to accommodate growth in the planning area, including the Development Proposals, through 2030. City of National City Verification of Ongoing policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures. Development Services Depart- Adoption of the ment General Plan City of National City Perform hydraulic modeling analysis to assess the im- pacts of additional wastewater and revise or repriori- tize recommended Capital Improve- ment Program. Once 6-17 APPENDIX F REVISED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CIRCULATION ELEMENT TECHNICAL REPORT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE CIRCULATION ELEMENT TECHNICAL REPORT Prepared for: City of National City Submitted by: FEHR & PEERS 101 Broadway, Suite 1970 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 234-3190 Ref: 0009-0145 January 2011 FEHR 1KA SPORTAW) €O45.ILTAU1'> TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Report Overview and Purpose 1 1.2 Report Organization 1 2. Traffic Modeling and Forecasting 4 2.1 Model Calibration and Validation 4 2.2 Travel Demand Modeling Process 7 3. Roadway Functional Classifications and Level of Service Standards 8 3.1 Roadway Functional Classifications 8 3.2 Level of Service Standards 9 4. Existing Conditions 11 4.1 Bicycle Facilities 11 4.2 Pedestrian Facilities 14 4.3 Roadways Network 14 4.4 Transit Services and Facilities 29 4.5 Goods Movement Facilities 32 5. Circulation Element Goals and Policies 35 5.1 Land Use and Circulation Linkages 35 5.2 Mobility Framework 35 5.3 Regional Circulation Planning 37 5.4 Transportation Demand Management 37 5.5 Vehicular Parking 38 5.6 Goods Movement 39 5.7 Public Transit 39 5.8 Pedestrian Circulation 40 5.9 Bikeways 40 6. Future Year 2030 Conditions 42 6.2 Pedestrian Facilities 46 6.3 Roadway Network 52 6.4 Transit Services and Facilities 84 6.5 Goods Movement Facilities 92 APPENDICES Appendix A: Proposed Community Corridors Street Cross -Sections Appendix B: Intersection LOS Analysis for Plaza Boulevard with Transit Options LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1-1 Regional Location 2 Figure 1-2 City Boundary and Sphere of Influence 3 Figure 2-1 Screenline Locations 5 Figure 4-1 Existing Bicycle Facilities 12 Figure 4-2 Existing Roadway Classifications 19 Figure 4-3 Existing Roadway Level of Service 26 Figure 4-4 Residential Permit Parking Areas 28 Figure 4-5 Transit Routes and Stops 30 Figure 4-6 Commute Mode Shares in National City 31 Figure 4-7 Commute Mode Shares in San Diego County 31 Figure 4-8 Truck Routes 33 Figure 6-1 Proposed Bicycle Facilities 44 Figure 6-2 Community Corridors 45 Figure 6-3 Street Conversion Key Map 47 Figure 6-4 Adopted Circulation Element Roadway Classifications 54 Figure 6-5 Adopted Circulation Element Roadway Level of Service 60 Figure 6-6 Proposed Circulation Element Roadway Classifications 63 Figure 6-7 Proposed Circulation Element Roadway Level of Service 69 Figure 6-8 Plaza Boulevard Proposed Cross -Sections 86 Figure 6-9 Proposed Shuttle Route 1 88 Figure 6-10 Proposed Shuttle Route 2 89 Figure 6-11 Proposed Shuttle Route 3 90 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1: National City Roadway Circulation Element Update Traffic Model Validation 6 Table 3.1: Level of Service (LOS) Definitions 9 Table 3.2: Circulation Element Roadway Classifications Capacity and Level of Service Standards 10 Table 4.1: Roadway Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Level of Service (LOS) Existing Conditions 20 Table 4.2: On -Street Parking Analysis for Arterial and Collector Roadways 27 Table 6.1: Site 6 Street Conversion LOS 51 Table 6.2: Roadway Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Level of Service (LOS) Adopted GP — Year 2030 Conditions 55 Table 6.3: Roadway Average Daily Traffic (ADT) and Level of Service (LOS) Proposed GP — Year 2030 Conditions 64 Table 6.4: Deficient Facilities and Recommended Mitigation Measures Proposed Circulation Element70 Table 6.5: City of San Diego Circulation Element Roadway Classifications Capacity and Level of Service Standards 74 Table 6.6: City of Chula Vista Circulation Element Roadway Classifications Capacity and Level of Service Standards 75 Table 6.7: County of San Diego Proposed Roadway Segment Daily Capacity and Level of Service Standards 75 Table 6.8: City of San Diego Measures of Significant Project Traffic Impacts 77 Table 6.9: Measures of Significant Project Impacts to Congestion on Road Segments: Allowable Increases on Congested Road Segments 78 Table 6.10: Roadway Level of Service by Jurisdiction Existing Conditions 79 Table 6.11: 2030 Forecast Roadway Level of Service by Jurisdiction City of National City Adopted General Plan 80 Table 6.12: 2030 Forecast Roadway Level of Service by Jurisdiction City of National City Proposed General Plan Update 81 Table 6.13: Significant Traffic Impacts Proposed National City General Plan vs. Existing Conditions (Proposed Plan to Ground) 82 Table 6.14: Significant Traffic Impacts Proposed National City General Plan vs. Adopted National City General Plan (Proposed Plan to Adopted Plan) 83 Table 6.15: Plaza Boulevard Traffic Operations With Transit Options 85 Table 6.16: Proposed Shuttle Route Service Characteristics 91 Table 6.17: Estimated Annual Cost For Operating A Proposed Shuttle Route 92 City of National City General P1 January 2011 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 REPORT OVERVIEW AND PURPOSE The Circulation Element of the General Plan provides a future vision and key direction for achieving the development of a t ruly m ulti-modal transportation system serving al I t he citizens of the C ity of N ational City. The current Circulation Element for the City of National City was prepared in 1996 and has been the subject of v arious m odifications over t he years. The c urrent update effort provides t he op portunity to review past accomplishments and refocus efforts to effectively plan a balanced transportation system. The t wo m ain p urposes of t he C irculation Element U pdate ar e (1) to s et f orth g oals, po licies a nd strategies t hat pr omote ef fective, s afe, and ef ficient us e of ex fisting t ransportation f acilities and the development of ne w f acilities; as w ell as (2) t o d ocument t he t echnical pr ocess and an alytical of forts undertaken to support the Update . This Element seeks to assure that the City's circulation system provides for the effective movement of people and goods in and around the City while giving strong consideration to non single -occupant -vehicle (SOV) forms of transportation including bikes, pedestrians and transit. T o achieve this, the Circulation Element utilizes a multi-modal/whole-systems approach to circulation planning. 1.2 REPORT ORGANIZATION Following this Introduction chapter, this report is organized into the following sections: 2.0 Traffic Modeling and Forecasting — This chapter discusses in general terms, the travel demand forecast modeling process, and the process utilized to calibrate and validate the SANDAG Series 11 Southbay III base year 2003 traffic model for the City of National City. 3.0 Roadway Functional Classifications and Level of Service Standards — This chapter presents the recommended Circulation Element roadway functional classifications and Level of Service (LOS) standards. 4.0 Existing Conditions — This chapter describes the existing transportation network and provides an overview of existing operating conditions for all modes of transportation. 5.0 Circulation Element Goals and Policies — Consistent with the vision of the General Plan Update, this chapter describes the goals and policies developed for the Circulation Element. 6.0 Future Year 2 030 Conditions — This c hapter d escribes pr ojected long-range roadway t raffic conditions in the City of N ational C ity, under bo th t he currently adapted an d proposed General Plan Circulation Elements. Discussions on improving non -motorized and transit modes of transportation are provided as well. Figure 1-1 shows the regional location, and Figure 1-2 shows the city boundary and sphere of influence. FEHR &.P•LERS 7R AKSIOR i A7 l0.1 CONS UtTAN S CORONADO fp FEHR (Sr. NER S-A-.N_D' E,G 0 IMPERIAL BEACH LA,M ESA C H`U'L A Et C-ALJ0 N UNINCORPORATED SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEGEND Base Layers jCity of National City Freeways . Major Roads ---�� Railroad - Streams N NOT TO SCALE REGIONAL LOCATION FIGURE 1-1 "s. ‘. NATION fp FEIIR & PrER1 AEI,A.a CANEN tlC�rw Cep\N �� T r ,. �1 N 9Ra\h5 7 ' \ •• A2' ' T A LEGEND Base Layers City of National City National City Planning Area Boundary Freeways Major Roads Local Roads Railroad -- Streams N D EGO •.„ National City Southern, So ndary N NCT TO SCALE CITY BOUNDARY AND SPHERE OF INFLUENCE FIGURE 1.2 2. TRAFFIC MODELING AND FORECASTING Traffic modeling is an essential step in the Circulation Element Update process, providing a valuable tool in the analysis of the timing and location of transportation network modifications and planned land uses within the City of National City. This chapter discusses the process utilized to calibrate and validate the base year 2003 SANDAG Series 11 Southbay III Model for use in the City of National City's Circulation Element U pdate. This c hapter al so pr ovides an ov erview of t he t ravel de mand forecast modeling process. 2.1 MODEL CALIBRATION AND VALIDATION Traffic model c alibration is t he pr ocess of ens uring t he ac curacy of t he m odel b y adjusting m odel parameters to reasonably replicate existing t raffic volumes i n t he bas e m odel. The premise is that t he better the traffic model replicates existing traffic volumes, the better its ability to accurately forecast future year traffic volumes. The traffic model is validated through analyses that measure the degree to which estimated traffic volumes replicate existing traffic volumes. The parameters of the validated base year model are then utilized with future land use and transportation network information to forecast 2030 traffic volumes. 2.1.1 Calibration Process The S outhbay III Traffic Mode 1 was de veloped as a f ocused m odel ut ilizing t he S ANDAG R egional Transportation Mo del, with additional land us e and roadway network det ails pr ovided f or t he Southbay cities of Chula Vista and National City and its sphere of influence. Model calibration entails running a base yeartransportation model and assessing the degree to which estimated traffic volumes replicate existing traffic volumes. The model parameters are then adjusted and the m odel is r erun until t he m odel-estimated t raffic volumes c losely r eplicate observed t raffic c ounts. Calibration of the Southbay III base year required eight (8) iterations of the model, including refinements and adjustments to centroid connectors (to better reflect the local street network), TAZ loadings, roadway speeds, and trip distribution parameters. 2.1.2 Validation Process and Results The model validation process consists of testing the estimated base year model output against actual traffic counts. I f the traffic model is a ble to replicate actual traffic counts within an ac ceptable Ievel of accuracy, the traffic model is considered "validated". After the model is validated, model parameters are utilized in c onjunction with f uture year land us es a nd t ransportation n etwork t o f orecast f uture t raffic volumes. Screenline a nalyses were em ployed to as sess t he similarity between estimated an d o bserved t raffic volumes w ithin the C ity of N ational City. S creenline an alysis e ntails aggregating t raffic v olumes on parallel roadways to capture the magnitude of travel demands in a particular direction across the study area n etwork. T he modeled s creenline t raffic v olumes ar e c ompared t o t he actual s creenline t raffic volumes to measure the degree to which modeled volumes replicated actual traffic volumes. Based upon local and national standards, transportation model validation is typically considered to be accomplished when the model estimated screenline traffic volumes are within + 10% of the observed screenline traffic volumes. Six (6) screenlines w ere e stablished t o c apture t he major t ravel f lows w ithin a nd i n/out of t he C ity of National C ity. Figure 2-1 displays t he s creenline locations utilized t o validate t he C ity of National C ity base year 2003 traffic model. NEE A 1 FEHR & PFFRS Ta.u.PovT,I, �atwird City iouthern Boundary LEGEND Base Layers City of National City Freeways Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Screenlines Screenline ±X.X% Percent Difference between 2003 Model Estimates and Observed Traffic Volumes NOT -O SCALE SCREENLINE ANALYSIS FIGURE 2-1 City of National City General Plan tl January 2011 Table 2.1 summarizes t he c omparison of obs erved and m odeled t raffic v olumes b y s creenline. On average, modeled screenline traffic volumes were within 7.2% of observed volumes, indicating a relatively strong level of accuracy. TABLE 2.1: NATIONAL CITY ROADWAY CIRCULATION ELEMENT UPDATE TRAFFIC MODEL VALIDATION Screenline Observed ADT Model Estimated ADT Different Percent Difference 1 53,100 56,900 3,800 7.2% 2 69,100 73,100 4,000 5.8% 3 68,800 66,500 -2.300 -3.3% 4 11,800 12,300 500 4.2% 5 91,600 85,100 -6,500 -7.1 6 66,300 63,100 -3,200 -4.8% Source: Fehr & Peers'. September 2010 As a s upporting ana lysis, a s tatter -point di agram was dev eloped t o s how t he r elationship bet ween estimated and observed s creenline t raffic v olumes. Figure 2-2 displays t he scatter -point di agram o f estimated and observed screenline traffic volumes and the best fit line correlating the two set of volumes (observed and modeled). The diagram indicates that a strong correlation exists between the observed and m odeled t raffic v olumes; a f urther i ndication t hat t he bas e year 2003 m odel provides a c onsistent level of accuracy. Figure 2-2 Scatter -Point Diagram of Modeled and Observed Traffic Volumes 45,000 40,000 35,000 30, 000 25,000 '3 20,000 O 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 FH-IR z VEERS TBAkSFORffillON CONSU,TANIS 10.000 Modeled ADT 20,000 30,000 Modeled ADT 40,000 50,000 City of National City General Plan Update ,r Circulation El January 2011 It should be further noted that SANDAG typically develops and applies roadway link adjustment factors based o n t he d ifference bet ween t he f inal es timated v olumes for the bas e year 2003 m odel an d t he observed t raffic c aunts. These adj ustment f actors are t hen a pplied t o t he f orecast year 20 30 t raffic volumes, further counteracting any remaining modeling error. 2.2 TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING PROCESS Regional traffic models consist of two primary components — the transportation network or the "supply" of transportation s ervices, an d I and development which c reates t he " demand" f or t ravel. Transportation modeling t raditionally f ollows a f our -step pr ocess, consisting of trip gen eration, t rip d istribution, m ode choice, and trip assignment, as described below: 1. Trip Generation — Estimates t he n umber of t rips t hat ar e ge nerated b y a nd attracted t o each traffic analysis zone (TAZ) on an average weekday for each forecast year. 2. Trip Distribution — Connects trip ends to one another to create a flow of trips between TAZs within the study area. A gravity -based model is typically utilized to estimate zone -to -zone trip making. The gr avity-based m odel pos tulates t hat t he num ber of t rips f rom one zone t o anot her i s a function of the level of activity i n each zone and the di stance between zones. F or ex ample, zones that are close to one another and contain high levels of activity (i.e. high intensity of land uses) would have a relatively high level of traffic flowing between them. 3. Mode Choice — Determines t he num ber of t ravelers t hat would ut ilize each par ticular m ode of travel available to them, such as automobile, bus, light rail, bicycle, and walking. Mode choice is typically considered to be a function of the relative Ievels of service (travel times) provided by each mode or a combination of modes of travel, and of the socio-economic characteristics of the traveler. 4. Trip Assignment — Assigns zone -to -zone trip flows to the roadway network based on minimum travel times, including assignment of vehicle trips to roadway networks and transit trips to transit networks. A capacity -restrained equilibrium model is typically utilized to allow for consideration of roadway congestion. One of the pr imary f inal products of t he f our -step modeling pr ocess i s the average da ily t raffic ( ADT) volumes on the study area network by roadway segment. ADT forecasts for the year 2030 as derived from the Southbay III traffic model provided the basis for the proposed roadway network as part of the Circulation Element update. FEHR FRAMSPOR1AI1 City of National City Genera) Plan Update - January 2011 3. ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS As a key component of the Circulation Element Update, a set of roadway functional classifications were utilized for the City of National City to ensure that roadway characteristics and design attributes properly reflect t he des ired c haracter of t he C ity, while a Iso providing f or ac ceptable t raffic oper ations. T his chapter summarizes the roadway functional classifications and associated Level of Service (LOS) standards used in updating National City's Circulation Element. 3.1 ROADWAY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATIONS The C ity of National C ity's roadway s ystem i ncludes a r ange of f acilities i ncluding freeways, arterials, collectors and I ocal roads. Two m ajor f unctions of a roadway are to serve through t raffic and provide access to adjacent property, and different roadways prioritize these two functions differently. For instance, ar terials, which mostly c onsist of t he bigger r oadways, generally pr ioritize t he m ovement of traffic over access to individual adjacent properties, while local streets, which mostly consist of smaller roadways, pr ioritize ac cess t o pr ivate properties o ver t hrough traffic. Roadways are a Iso i ntended to provide bicycle and pedestrian access and circulation, and as such form the backbone of the bicycle and pedestrian network. The f ollowing f unctional c lassifications were utilized for t he C ity of N ational C ity Circulation E lement roadways: Freeway: A state -designated, high-speed, high capacity route that serves statewide and interregional t ransportation needs . Freeways ha ve I imited di rect ac cess and ar e generally two or more lanes in each direction, separated by a raised median or buffer. There are three freeways that run through National City: Interstate 5, Interstate 805, and State Route 54. Arterial: Arterials are intended to carry greater than 20,000 vehicles per day, providing circulation across the City and access to major destination points throughout the region. Arterials are us ually c omprised of 4 t o 6 t ravel I anes, often with s ynchronized t raffic s ignals t o improve t raffic f low and t ravel t ime. A rterials typically include m edians or c enter t urn lands to provide access control. There are a total of 16 arterial roadways within National City. Collector: Collectors are intended to "collect" traffic from local roadways and carry it to roadways higher i n t he street c lassification h ierarchy. T hese roadways s erve as i ntermediaries between arterials and local roads, providing direct access to parcels in both residential and non-residential areas. Collectors typically have one or two lanes of traffic in each direction and can carry up to 20,000 vehicles on a daily basis. Collectors may serve as alternate r outes t o arterials f or movement ac ross t he C ity. T here ar e a total of 28 collector roadways within National City. Local: Local streets are i ntended to serve adjacent properties and en hance local connectivity, providing direct access to properties and connections to collectors and arterials. Loc al streets typically carry less than 5,000 vehicles per day. Speed limits on local streets do not exceed 25 miles per hour (mph). Local streets typically consist of two driving lanes. Alleys are a subset of the local street network, providing direct access to local residences and businesses. Parking is prohibited in alleys to allow access for emergency response vehicles. waste management and utility services, and adjacent property owners. Due to FEHR PEERS (ONSUUTANIS City of National Cf January 2011 rat Pan Update - their large number, local streets (which include alleys) are not specifically addressed in this document, but are recognized as part of this Circulation Element Update. 3.2 LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS The concept of LOS is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and t he m otorist's and/ or pas sengers' p erception of oper ations. A L OS def inition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as delay, speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, interruptions in traffic flow, q ueuing, comfort. and convenience. Table 3.1 describes generalized definitions of the various LOS categories (A through F) as applied to roadway operations. TABLE 3.1: LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS LOS Category Definition of Operation A This LO S represents a c ompletely free -flow c ondition, w here t he o peration o f vehicles is virtually unaffected by the presence of other vehicles and only constrained by the geometric features of the highway and by driver preferences. B This LOS represents a r elatively free -flow condition, although the presence of other vehicles becomes noticeable. Average travel speeds are the same as in LOS A, but drivers have slightly less freedom to maneuver. C At this LOS the influence of traffic density on operations becomes marked. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is clearly affected by other vehicles. D At this LOS, the ability to maneuver is notably restricted due to traffic congestion, and only minor disruptions can be absorbed without extensive queues forming and the service deteriorating. E This LOS represents operations at or near capacity. LOS E is an unstable level, with vehicles operating with minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. At LOS E, disruptions cannot be dissipated readily thus causing deterioration down to LOS F. F At t his LO S, forced or br eakdown of t raffic flow oc curs, although o perations appear to be at capacity, queues form behind these breakdowns. 0 perations within queues are highly unstable, with vehicles experiencing brief p eriods o f movement followed by stoppages. Source: Highway Capacity Manual 2000 In ge neral, a LOS of C o r bet ter is ac cepted as t he des ign standard for a r oadway and LOS D is considered as an acceptable LO S. LO S E a nd F r epresent s ignificant I evels of c ongestion and are generally not acceptable. However, t here may be situations i n which LO S E or F may b e acceptable where the goal is to promote other modes of transportation, such as walking, bicycling; and transit, or to calm traffic. National City has developed a methodology for classifying Level of Service by street classification. These classifications, s hown i n Table 3.2, w ere d eveloped bas ed on b ackground k nowledge of t he C ity's roadway network, c oordination with C ity s taff, and with r eference t o t he San Diego T raffic E ngineers' Council (SANTEC) and Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) guidelines. FEHR & PEERS IPA NSFORFAI'ION CONSULTANTS City of National City General Plan Upd< January 2011 TABLE 3.2: CIRCULATION ELEMENT ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Street Level of Service* Classification Lanes A B C D E F Arterial 6 0-20,000 20,001- 28,000 28,001- 40,000 40,001- 45,000 45,001- 40,000 50,001+ Arterial 4 015,000 15,001- 21,000 21,001- 30,000 30,001- 35,000 35,001- 40,000 40,001+ Arterial 4 010,000 10,001- 14,000 14,001- 20,000 20,001- 25,000 25,001- 30,000 30,001+ Arterial 3+1 0-8.500 8,501- 12,000 12,001- 17,000 17,001- 21,000 21,001- 25,000 25,001+ Collector 4 0-7,000 7,001- 10,000 10,001 14,000 14,001- 17.000 17,001- 20,000 20,001+ Collector 2+1 0 5,000 5,001- 7,000 7.001- 10,000 10,001- 13,000 13,001- 15,000 15,001+ Collector 2 0-4.000 4,001- 5,500 5,501- 7,500 7,501- 9,000 9,001- 10,000 10,001+ Approximate recommended Average Daily Traffic based upon SANTEC Guidelines, as amended by the City of National City. Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes are used at a planning level to provide a preliminary estimate of traffic operations for roadways in the planning area. Level of service classifications for National City roadways are accompanied by ADT volumes set according to street classification as shown in the table above. FEHR &- Peas IAANSPORTATTO'I CONSULTANTS City of National City General Plan Update January 2011 4. EXISTING CONDITIONS This chapter presents the physical and operational conditions of the existing circulation network in the City of National City, including an evaluation of non -motorized facilities, roadways, parking, public transit, and f reight systems w ithin t he C ity. T his chapter also des cribes k ey t erms a nd m ethodologies t hat explain t he c urrent c onditions and t he i dentified def iciencies i n N ational C ity's transportation s ystem, along with t he r egulatory framework a ffecting t ransportation i n t he C ity. T his i nformation was used i n determining changes to existing policies and development of new policies regarding mobility in the City's General Plan Update. The City of National City lies in the County of San Diego and shares jurisdictional boundaries with the City of San D iego t o t he north; the un incorporated County of San Diego to t he east; and t he City of C hula Vista to the south. Major highways, such as State Route 54, Interstate 5, and Interstate 805 provide a high I evel of r egional ac cessibility b etween the C ity of N ational C ity and of her I ocations ac ross t he County. The t ransportation s ystem i n N ational C ity is c omprised of di verse el ements i ncluding a n extensive roadway system; public transit including bus and light rail transit; bike and pedestrian facilities; and freight systems. Each of these elements is discussed below in greater detail. 4.1 BICYCLE FACILITIES Bicycling is considered an environmentally friendly mode of transportation that enhances both personal and social well being. It is also an important travel mode as part of a seamless transportation system that includes of her m odes of transportation, such as transit and walking. In addition t o t ransportation, this mode of travel provides many public access, health and economic benefits. Bicycling is recognized as an integral component of National City's transportation system, currently and in the future. Safe, convenient, attractive, and well -designed bicycle facilities are essential if this mode is to be pr operly ac commodated an d encouraged. Well -designed bicycle f acilities ar e s afe, at tractive, convenient, and eas y t o use. Inadequate f acilities d iscourage users and unnecessary f acilities w aste money and resources. The bicycle system in National City includes a variety of bicycle facilities, as shown in Figure 4-1. These facilities include dedicated off-street bicycle paths and on -street bicycle facilities designated by signage or striping on the roadway. IRANSPORTATIOH CONSULTANTS 1 ►r."t 11 11 11 11 11 fp FEHR & PEERS ►' 1I : tt ..—.+ \ National Cite Southern Boundary LEGEND Base Layers _ ; City of National City - Freeways Major Roads Local Roads Railroad - Streams Existing Bicycle Network Bike Path (Class I) Bike Lane (Class II) Bike Route (Class III) Q Bike Lockers Existing Bicycle Network Outside National City Bike Path (Class I) Bike Lane (Class II) Bike Route (Class III) M1OT 'O SCALE EXISTING BICYCLE FACILITIES FIGURE 4-1 City of National City General Plan Update— Cir January 2011 National City describes current bicycle facilities, categorized by three distinct bikeway classifications, as defined by Chapter 1000 "Bikeway Planning and Design" of the California Highway Design Manual: 1. Class I Bike Paths also t ermed shared -use or m ulti-use p aths, include paved r ight-of-way completely s eparated f rom an adj acent street or h ighway for t he ex clusive use of b icyclists, pedestrians, a nd t hose us ing no n-motorized m odes of t ravel. National C ity c urrently has 2.4 miles of Class I bike paths, including portions of the Bayshore Bikeway and the Sweetwater River Bikeway. The Bayshore Bikeway is a 26-mile long regional facility that encircles San Diego Bay, passing through t he p lanning ar e in N ational C ity a long H arbor D rive, T idelands A venue. an d W. 32 nd Street, and pr oviding a I ink t o t he near by c ities of San Diego, C oronado, I mperial B each, an d Chula V ista. Its first stage was bu ilt i n 197 6, as pa rt of N ational C ity's $ 50,000 t ransportation development allocation from SANDAG to widen the Chollas Creek Bridge. In addition to recreational and coastal access opportunities, the facility provides alternative transportation options to many industrial and military jobs that are located along the bikeway. The Sweetwater R iver Bikeway i s I ocated a long t he s outhern b order of N ational C ity, passing through portions of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego. The facility runs parallel to State Route 54 and the Sweetwater River Flood Control Channel connecting to the Bayshore Bikeway at W. 32"d Street neat the Gordy Shields Bridge. 2. Class II Bike Lanes include painted lanes, pavement markings, and signage for one-way travel on a street or highway for exclusive or preferential bicycle travel. National City currently has 1.7 miles of Class II bike lanes, including portions of Plaza Bonita Road, Bay Marina Drive, Coolidge Avenue and Hoover Avenue (located in the Kimball neighborhood). 3. Class III Bike Routes provide shared use with motor vehicle traffic, identified by signage only. "Shared Lane" pavement markings may also be used. While the San Diego Regional Bicycle Ft IL PEERS rRnx SP•OB rArIO Cfl8S U.TANYS City of National City General Flan Update — Cii; January 2011 Plan identifies approximately 20 miles of Class III bike routes in National City, only 0.6 miles are currently signed. The City of National City is currently preparing a Bicycle Master Plan, wh.ch will identify a well connected bicycle network, pr ioritize the un built p ortions and make recommendations f or public educ ation an d encouragement programs. T ypical i mprovements w ill include gap c losures f or Class I bi keways, expansion of C lass I I and I I bi keways, s pecial t reatments at i ntersections, an d bi cycle par king and support facilities. 4.2 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES Walking is anot her environmentally f riendly m ode of t ransportation t hat enhances both per sonal a nd social well being. In addition to transportation, this mode of travel provides many public access, health and economic benefits. Walking is recognized as an integral component of National City's transportation system. Safe, convenient, attractive, and well -designed pedestrian facilities are essential if this mode is to be properly accommodated and encouraged. Pedestrian circulation is particularly important because, as noted previously, approximately 7.4 percent of owner -occupied households and 24.4 percent of renter -occupied households in National City do not own a m otor v ehicle (US C ensus Bureau, Censes 20 00 S ummary F ile 3—SF3). Since N ational C ity is comprised of a t raditional grid network of roads an d adj acent s idewalk facilities, pe destrians ha ve a variety of routes connecting residences to shopping districts, employment centers, transit facilities, schools, an d par ks. Currently, s treetscape a nd traffic c aiming en hancements are s cheduled t o be implemented through capital improvement projects to enhance safety and mobility for pedestrians within the City. Safe R outes t o School i s an i mportant pr ogram w hich i s b eing i mplemented ac ross t he C ity. The program's primary objective is to create safe and accessible walking corridors between schools and the feeder ne ighborhoods. It aims to encourage and increase the n umber of c hildren who walk to s chool through pub lic out reach a nd educ ation. Increased walking r ewards c itizens by r educing he alth r isks associated with traffic congestion, air pollution, and childhood obesity and diabetes. The program also intends t o s trengthen par tnerships be tween t he C ity, s chools, local b usinesses, community gr oups, parents, and residents of National City. Implementation has begun and will continue with the installation of traffic safety enhancements such as flashing warning beacons, radar speed feedback signs, pedestrian countdown signals at intersections, in road lights, pedestrian refuge islands & curb extensions at crosswalks, sidewalk gap closures, ADA upgrades to curb ramps, and enhanced signage and striping. 4.3 ROADWAYS NETWORK Circulation Element Roadway Description This section describes the key roadways comprising the vehicular circulation system, in terms of north - south roadways, then east -west roadways. FEHR.. & PEER_S TRANSPORTATflN CONSOLTANTS City of National City Oer era/ Ptan Update January 2011 North -South Roadways Harbor Drive is a north -south Arterial with four travel lanes extending from Division Street south to Civic Center Drive. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 13,000 to 18, 000 with a posted speed limit of 45 mph. Tidelands Avenue is a n orth-south Collector w ith two travel lanes ex tending from C ivic C enter D rive south to W. 32"d Street. Current a verage daily traffic v olumes r ange f rom 1,900to 2,500 with posted speeds ranging from 35 mph to 40 mph. Marina Way is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes extending from Bay Marina Drive south to W. 32nd Street. The current average daily traffic volume is 1,700 with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Speed humps with 15 mph warning signs are present along much of Marina Way. Cleveland Avenue is a n orth-south Collector with two travel lanes ex tending from C ivic C enter D rive south to Bay Marina Drive. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 3,600 to 4,000 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Wilson Avenue is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes extending from Civic Center Drive south to W. 22"d Street. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 2,800 to 3,200 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Wilson Avenue, just south of W. 22' Street, is currently a one lane (northbound only) facility which carries approximately 2,200 average daily traffic. Hoover Avenue is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes between W. 8th Street and W. 18`h Street, carrying an average daily traffic of 1,600 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. From W. 22"d Street to W. 301h Street, Hoover Avenue is a four lane collector with average daily traffic volumes ranging from 3,000 on the north end to 10,900 further south with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Finally, from W. 30`h Street to W. 33'd Street. Hoover Avenue is a two-lane Collector carrying an average daily traffic of 1,800 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Roosevelt Avenue is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes extending from Division Street south to W. 16`h Street. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 2,600 to 4,700 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. West Avenue is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes between W. 16th Street and W. 18`h Street. The current average daily traffic volume is 2,600 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. National City Boulevard is a north -south Arterial with four travel lanes extending from Division Street south across SR-54 to W. 35`h Street. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 12,900 to 17,800 with posted speed limits ranging from 30 mph to 35 mph. D Avenue is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes extending from Division Street south to W. 30"' Street. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 3,200 to 7,200 with posted speed limits ranging from 30 mph to 35 mph. Highland Avenue is a north -south Arterial with four travel lanes extending from Delta Street south to SR- 54. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 14,100 to 21,200 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. L Avenue is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes extending from E. 81h Street south to E. 30th Street. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 2,600 to 4,300 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Palm Avenue is a north -south Arterial with f our t ravel I anes between 1-805 and D ivision Street. T he current a verage daily traffic volume is 16,800 with a posted s peed I imit of 40 mph. B etween Division F[FIR rRARSPORIAll li Street and E. 18`h Street, Palm Avenue is a two-lane Collector with average daily traffic volumes ranging from 7,600 to 12,800 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Newell Street is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes extending from E . 18`h Street south t o Prospect Street. The current average daily traffic volume is 2,100 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Grove Street is a nor th-south Collector with two travel lanes extending f rom Prospect Street s outh t o Sweetwater Road. The current average daily traffic volume is 2,400 with a posted speed limit of 25 mph. Euclid Avenue is a four -lane Arterial extending from Cervantes Avenue south to Sweetwater Road. The current average daily traffic v olumes range between 8, 800 and 15,500 with a posted s peed I imit of 35 mph. Harbison Avenue is a north -south Collector with two travel lanes extending from Division Street south to E. 8th Street. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 3,400 to 4,000 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. From E. 8th Street to Plaza Boulevard, Harbison Avenue is a four -lane Collector with an average daily traffic volume of 6,500 and a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Finally, from Plaza Boulevard to 16th Street, H arbison A venue is a t wo-lane C ollector with an a verage daily t raffic volume of 5, 300 an d a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Plaza Bonita Road is a four -lane Arterial extending from Sweetwater Road south to Bonita Mesa Road. The current average daily traffic volume is 9,000 with a posted speed limit 45 mph. Plaza Bonita Center Way is a four -lane Arterial extending from SR-54 south to Sweetwater Road. The current average daily traffic volume is 17,100 with a posted speed limit 45 mph. East-West Roadways Division Street is a three/two-lane Collector extending f rom N ational C ity Boulevard east t o Highland Avenue. Current average daily traffic volumes range between 8.400 and 10,800 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. From Highland Avenue east to Harbison Avenue, Division Street is a four -lane Arterial with average daily traffic volumes ranging between 10,400 and 17,100 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. 4th Street is a t wo-lane C ollector extending f rom National C ity B oulevard e ast t o Harbison A venue. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 3,700 to 8,300 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. 8th Street is a four -lane Arterial extending from Harbor Drive east to Plaza Boulevard. Between Harbor Drive and National City Boulevard, the current average daily traffic volumes range from 10,000 to 22,500 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph; between National City Boulevard and Highland Avenue, the current average daily traffic volumes range from 11,000 to 15,600 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph; between Highland Avenue a nd Palm A venue, t he c urrent average daily t raffic v olume i s 17, 500 with a posted speed limit of 40 mph; and between Palm Avenue and Paradise Valley Road, the current average daily traffic volumes range from 14,200 to 18,100 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Plaza Boulevard is a one -lane (eastbound) Collector between Coolidge Avenue and Hoover Avenue with a current average daily traffic volume of 3,500 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Between Hoover Avenue and National City Boulevard, Plaza Boulevard is a four -lane Collector with an average daily traffic volume of 4,800 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Plaza Boulevard is a four -lane Arterial extending from N ational C ity Boulevard eas t to P aradise V alley R oad. Between N ational C ity Boulevard an d Highland Avenue. the current average daily traffic volumes range from 8, 100 to 1 0,200 with a posted speed limit of 35 m ph; between Highland A venue and Euclid Avenue, the c urrent a verage daily traffic volumes range from 17,300 to 31,200 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph; and between Euclid Avenue and Paradise Valley Road, the current a verage daily traffic volumes range from 17,300 to 22,500 with posted speed limits range from 35 mph to 40 mph. FEH1 TRANWR PEEILS CONSUClAN7$ Paradise Valley Road is a four -lane Arterial extending from E. 8th Street east to Plaza Entrada. The current average daily traffic volume is 27,500 with a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Civic Center Drive is a two-lane Collector extending from Harbor Drive east to National City Boulevard. Current average daily traffic volumes range from 6,100 to 7,000 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. 16th Street is a two-lane Collector between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard with an average daily traffic volume of 2,400 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Between National City Boulevard and Highland Avenue, 16th Street is a four -lane Collector with average daily traffic volumes range from 4,800 to 6,600 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Finally, 16th Street is a two-lane Collector between Highland Avenue and Harbison Avenue with average daily traffic volumes of 6,600 to 7,800 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. 18th Street is a two-lane Collector extending from Wilson Avenue east to Rachael Avenue. Average daily traffic volumes range between 4,400 and 9,800 with posted speed limits range from 30 mph to 35 mph. 19th Street is a four -lane Collector extending from Tidelands Avenue east to Wilson Avenue. The current average daily traffic volume is 2,800 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Bay Marina Drive is a four -lane Collector between Tidelands Avenue and Marina Way with an average daily traffic volume of 4,200 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Between Marina Way and Interstate 5, Bay Marina Drive is a four -lane Arterial with average daily traffic volumes range from 4,200 to 9,400 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Mile of Cars Way is a four -lane Arterial extending from Interstate 5 east to National City Boulevard. Average daily traffic volumes range from 14,200 to 19,200 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. 22"d Street is a two-lane Collector extending from Wilson Avenue to National City Boulevard. The current average daily traffic volume is 2,400 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. 24th Street is a four -lane Arterial extending from National City Boulevard east to Highland Avenue. Average daily traffic volumes range from 8,800 to 9,500 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. From Highland Avenue to L Avenue, 24th Street is a two-lane Collector with an average daily traffic volume of 3,700 and posted speed limits of 35 mph. 30th Street is a four -lane Collector extending from Hoover Avenue east to National City Boulevard with an average daily traffic volume of 3,400 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. From National City Boulevard to Highland Avenue, 30th Street is a four -lane Arterial with average daily traffic volumes range from 5,500 to 9,100 and a posted speed limit of 35 mph. Finally, from Highland Avenue to N. 2"`' Avenue, 30th Street is a four -lane Arterial with average daily traffic volumes range from 18,300 to 20,600 and a posted speed limit of 40 mph. Sweetwater Road is a four -lane Arterial extending from N. 2nd Avenue to Valley Road with average daily traffic volumes range from 21,200 to 27,000 and a posted speed limit of 45 mph. From Valley Road to Plaza Bonita Road, Sweetwater Road is a six -lane Arterial with an average daily traffic volume of 14,800 and a posted speed limit of 45 mph. From Plaza Bonita Road to Calmoor Street, Sweetwater Road is a four -lane Arterial with an average daily traffic volume of 13,600 and a posted speed limit of 45 mph. Finally, from Calmoor Street to Plaza Bonita Center Way, Sweetwater Road is currently a three -lane Collector with an average daily traffic volume of 14,700 and a posted speed limit of 45 mph. 33`d Street is a two-lane Collector extending from Hoover Avenue east to National City Boulevard. The current average daily traffic volume is 1,800 with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Valley Road is a two-lane Collector extending from Sweetwater Road east to Calle Abajo. The current average daily traffic volumes is 7,000 with a posted speed limit of 35 mph. FEHIt & PFtI S TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS City of National City Genera January 20111 Roadway Classifications and Level of Service Analysis Results Figure 4-2 illustrates the current roadway functional classification for each of Circulation Element facilities. The Level of Service (LOS) was calculated for key roadway segments to evaluate existing traffic conditions. Table 4.1 displays ex isting A verage D aily T raffic V olumes (ADT) and t he results of the roadway LOS analysis, while Figure 4-3 displays the results in a mapped format. The f ollowing six (6) roadway s egments w ere i dentified as oper ating at LOS E o r F under E xisting conditions: • Palm Avenue, between Division Street and 4th Street (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between 4`h Street and 8`h Street (LOS E), • Palm Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between Plaza Boulevard and 16th Street (LOS F). • 18th Street. between L Avenue and Palm Avenue (LOS E), and • Sweetwater Road, between Calmoor Street and Plaza Bonita Center Way (LOS E). Parking National City has a variety of parking options throughout the City, including on -street parking with and without time restrictions and off-street parking Tots. An analysis of parking availability was conducted by the City's student fellows along arterial and collector roadways throughout National City. Parking conditions on these roadways were observed on random mid -week days during peak commute times: 7-9 AM and 4-6 PM. (Table 4.2 displays the results of the Arterial and Collector Parking Analysis). Based u pon t he an alyses m ost arterials app ear t o h ave a dequate street par king while s ome c ollector roadways were found to be near maximum capacity during these hours. Additional analysis may also be needed f or I ocal ne ighborhood r Dads i n t he e vening hour s t o det ermine ni ghttime par king needs i n residential ar eas. Through t he C ity's Capital I mprovement P rogram, oppor tunities t o ac commodate additional parking in residential neighborhoods through conversion of parallel on -street parking to angled parking (where right-of-way permits) is being studied. Select ne ighborhood ar eas ar e def ined as per mit par king di stricts, as s hown i n Figure 4-4. P ermit parking districts are designated to restrict commuters, mainly from nearby industrial shops, from depleting the on -street p arking s upply i n r esidential n eighborhoods. I n t hese d istricts, r esidents m ay obt ain a n annual parking permit from the City for a fee. Time -restricted parking passes for visitors/guests are also available upon request from parking permit holders. On -street signage designates the time periods that vehicles without proper permits are prohibited to park. Parking for commercial vehicles and large trucks is restricted in residential neighborhoods other than the purpose of loading and unloading only. FLIiR IRARSPORTAfi NTT°.. fp FEHR & PEERS ,n ; g9^A 11 Nat nal City enhern Bourn ary LEGEND Base Layers LT] City of National City Freeways — Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Roadway Classifications stitYMN Arterial Collector NOT TO SCALE EXISTING ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS FIGURE 4-2 TABLE 4.1: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity ADT LOS Harbor Drive Division Street 8th Street Arterial 4 40,000 18,000 B Harbor Drive 8thStreet Civic Center Drive Arterial 4 40,000 13,000 A Tidelands Avenue Civic Center Drive m 19 Street Collector 2 10,000 2,200 A Tidelands Avenue m 19 Street Bay Marina Drive Collector 2 10,000 1,900 A Tidelands Avenue Bay Marina Drive 0d 32 Street Collector 2 10,000 2,500 A Marina Way Bay Marina Drive 32nd Street Collector 2+1 15,000 1,700 A Cleveland Avenue Civic Center Drive m 19 Street Collector 2+1 15,000 3,600 A Cleveland Avenue n 19 Street Bay Marina Drive Collector 2+1 15,000 4,000 A Wilson Avenue Civic Center Drive 18th Street Collector 2 10,000 3,200 A Wilson Avenue 181h Street 22"d Street Collector 2 10,000 2,800 A Wilson Avenue 22"d Street Mile of Cars Way Collector 1 5,000 2,200 B Hoover Avenue 8`h Street 18th Street Collector 2 10,000 1,600 A Hoover Avenue 22"d Street Mile of Cars Way Collector 4 20,000 3,000 A Hoover Avenue Mile Cars ay 30`h Street Collector 4 20,000 10,900 C Hoover Avenue 301h Street 33'3 Street Collector 2 10,000 1,800 A Roosevelt Avenue Division Street 41h Street Collector 2 10,000 4,700 B Roosevelt Avenue 4,h Street 8m Street Collector 2 10,000 4,700 B Roosevelt Avenue 8'h Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 3,400 A Roosevelt Avenue Plaza Boulevard Civic Center Drive Collector 2 10,000 3,400 A Roosevelt Avenue Civic Center Drive 16th Street Collector 2 10,000 2,600 A West Avenue 16'hStreet 181h Street Collector 2 10,000 2,600 A National City Boulevard Division Street 4'h Street Arterial 4 40,000 14,500 A National City Boulevard 41h Street 8th Street Arterial 4 40.000 14,500 A National City Boulevard 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Arterial 4 40.000 12,900 A FEHR& PEERS iRANSPORIAHON CONSOLHAN15 City of National City General Plan Update-- Ccut January 2011 ' TABLE 4.1: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes AT Capacity ADT LOS National City Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Civic Center Drive Arterial 4 40,000 13,700 A National City Boulevard Civic Center Drive 16" Street Arterial 4 40,000 13,700 A National City Boulevard 16" Street 181" Street Arterial 4 40,000 13,300 A National City Boulevard 18" Street 22"d Street Arterial 4 40,000 13,300 A National City Boulevard 22nd Street 241" Street Arterial 4 40,000 13,300 A National City Boulevard 24" Street 301" Street Arterial 4 40,000 14.900 A National City Boulevard 30`h Street 35" Street Arterial 4 40,000 17 800 B D Avenue Division Street 4" Street Collector 2 10,000 3,200 A D Avenue 4`h Street 8" Street Collector 2 10,000 4,300 B D Avenue 8" Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 6,200 C D Avenue Plaza Boulevard 16°i Street Collector 2 10,000 7,200 C D Avenue 16" Street 181" Street Collector 2 10,000 6,800 C D Avenue 18`h Street 22nd Street Collector 2 10,000 4,900 B D Avenue 22"d Street 24" Street Collector 2 10,000 4,900 B D Avenue 24" Street 30" Street Collector 2 10,000 3,600 A Highland Avenue Delta Street Division Street Arterial 4 40,000 14,100 A Highland Avenue Division Street 4" Street Arterial 4 30,000 14,100 C Highland Avenue 4'h Street 8" Street Arterial 4 30.000 14,500 C Highland Avenue 8m Street Plaza Boulevard Arterial 4 40.000 20,400 B Highland Avenue Plaza Boulevard 16" Street Arterial 4 40,000 17,500 B Highland Avenue 161h Street 18" Street Arterial 4 40,000 21,000 B Highland Avenue 18" Street 24" Street Arterial 4 30,000 17,900 C Highland Avenue 241" Street 30" Street Arterial 4 30,000 19,300 C Highland Avenue 301" Street SR-54 Arterial 4 40,000 21,200 C FEHR bt PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSuOAN IS lil(i��r ,i�lllilill!u.�.r City of National City General Plan Update - Cif January 2011 TABLE 4.1: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes ADT Capacity ADT LOS L Avenue 8m Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 3,500 A L Avenue 16`h Street 18`h Street Collector 2 10,000 3,700 A L Avenue 18`h Street 24`h Street Collector 2 10,000 4,300 B L Avenue 24th Street 30`h Street Collector 2 10,000 2,600 A Palm Avenue 1-805 Division Street Arterial 4 40,000 16,800 B atm Avenue et 8"' Stree Collector 10,000 Palm Avenue 161h Street Newell Street 18th Street 181h Street Prospect Street Collector Collector 2 10,000 7,600 2 10,000 2,100 A Grove Street Prospect Street Sweetwater Road Collector 2 10,000 2,400 A Euclid Avenue Cervantes Avenue Division Street Arterial 4 30,000 10,800 B Euclid Avenue Euclid Avenue Division Street 4th Street 4`h Street Arterial 4 30,000 9,500 A 8`h Street Arterial 4 40,000 15,500 B Euclid Avenue 8'h Street Plaza Boulevard Arterial 4 30,000 15,100 Euclid Avenue Plaza Boulevard 16'h Street Arterial Euclid Avenue 16`h Street 18'h Street Arterial Euclid Avenue 181h Street 24th Street Arterial 4 4 4 30,000 8,800 30,000 8,800 30,000 9,900 A A A Euclid Avenue 24`h Street Sweetwater Road Arterial 4 30,000 9,900 Harbison Avenue Division Street 4''h Street Collector 2 10,000 4,000 A A Harbison Avenue 4Th Street 8'h Street Collector 2 10,000 3,400 A Harbison Avenue 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 6,500 A Harbison Avenue Plaza Boulevard 16th Street Collector 2 10,000 5,300 B Plaza Bonita Road Plaza Bonita Center Way Sweetwater Road SR-54 Bonita Mesa Road Arterial 4 40,000 9,000 A Sweetwater Road Arterial 4 40,000 17,100 B Division Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Collector 2+1 15,000 10,800 D Division Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 2 10,000 8,400 D Division Street Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 10,400 B FrIIR & PEERS iR A%SPOR !MOM COMSUIIAMiS City of National January 2011 City General Plan Up TABLE 4.1: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity ADT LOS Division Street Palm Avenue Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 17,100 B Division Street Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 14,300 C 4`h Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Collector 2 10,000 3,700 A 41h Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 2 10,000 5,300 B 4th Street Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Collector 2 10,000 6,900 C 4th Street Palm Avenue Euclid Avenue Collector 2 10,000 8,300 D 41h Street Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Collector 2 10,000 6,800 C 81h Street Harbor Drive 1-5 Arterial 4 30,000 10,000 A 8thStreet1-5 National City Boulevard Arterial 4 40,000 22,500 C 81h Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 15,600 C 8th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 11,000 B 8th Street Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 17,500 C 8m Street Palm Avenue Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 18,100 C 8thStreet Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 14,700 C Bch Street Harbison Avenue Paradise Valley Road Arterial 4 40,000 14,200 A Plaza Boulevard Coolidge Avenue Hoover Avenue Collector 1 5,000 3,50D C Plaza Boulevard Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 4,800 A Plaza Boulevard National City Boulevard DAvenue Arterial 4 30,000 8,100 A Plaza Boulevard D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 10,200 B Plaza Boulevard Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 17,300 B Plaza Boulevard Palm Avenue 1-805 Arterial 4 40,000 31,200 D Plaza Boulevard 1-805 Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 29,800 C Plaza Boulevard Euclid Avenue School Xing Arterial 4 40,000 22,500 C Plaza Boulevard School Xing Harbison Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 22,500 D Plaza Boulevard Harbison Avenue Paradise Valley Road Arterial 4 40,000 17,300 B Paradise Valley Road 8th Street Plaza Entrada Arterial 4 40,000 27,500 C Civic Center Drive Harbor Drive Wilson Avenue Collector 2 10,000 6,100 C FEkHR car PEER` IR ANSROR rATION CONSULTANTS City of National City Gene January 2011 Plan (mate.- Gicc11 TABLE 4.1: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity ADT LOS Civic Center Drive Wilson Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 2 10.000 7,000 C 16th Street Wilson Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 2,400 A 16th Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Collector 4 20,000 4,800 A 16th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 4 20,000 6,600 A 16th Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Collector 2 10,000 7,300 C 16`h Street L Avenue Palm Avenue Collector 2 10,000 7,800 D 16'h Street Palm Avenue Euclid Avenue Collector 2 10,000 6,600 C 16`h Street Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Collector 2 10,000 7,500 C 18thStreet Wilson Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 4,600 B 18th Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Collector 2 10,000 6,200 C 18th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 2 10,000 8,300 D 18th Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Collector 2 10,000 8,300 D -18 Street' ' L�#r�rt[!� _ • e P�Im Avenu, Collector ` -. U ,tl00 :, - 9,804 E 18th Street Palm Avenue Newell Street Collector 2 10,000 8,600 D 18'h Street Newell Street Euclid Avenue Collector 2 10,000 8,600 D 18`h Street Euclid Avenue Rachael Avenue Collector 2 10,000 4,400 B 19`h Street Tidelands Avenue Wilson Avenue Collector 4 20,000 2,800 A 22nd Street Wilson Avenue Hoover Avenue Collector 2 10,000 2,400 A 22"d Street Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 2,100 A Bay Marina Drive Tidelands Avenue Marina Way Collector 4 20,000 4,200 B Bay Marina Drive Marina Way Cleveland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 4,200 A Bay Marina Drive Cleveland Avenue 1-5 Arterial 4 30,000 9,400 A Mile of Cars Way 1-5 Wilson Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 19,200 B Mile of Cars Way Wilson Avenue Hoover Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 17,000 B Mile of Cars Way Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Arterial 4 40,000 14,200 A 24th Street National City D Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 9,500 A FEHR PEERS :M ANSPORIAtION COMSULIANTS • City of National City General Plan Update- January 2011 TABLE 4.1: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) EXISTING CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity ADT LOS Boulevard 24th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 8,800 A 24th Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Collector 2 10,000 3,700 A 30th Street Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 3,400 A 30th Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 5,500 A 301h Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 9,100 A 301h Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 18,300 B 30'h Street L Avenue 2nd Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 20,600 B Sweetwater Road 2nd Avenue Grove Street Arterial 4 40,000 21,200 C Sweetwater Road Grove Street I-805/Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 26,300 C Sweetwater Road I-805lEuclid Avenue Valley Road Arterial 4 40,000 27,000 C Sweetwater Road Valley Road Plaza Bonita Road Arterial 6 50,000 14,800 A Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Road Calmoor Street Arterial 4 40,000 13,600 A Sweetwater _ Road Calm Street r r Pa;za Bonita Collector+1.... 15,000 14,700 E . 33rd Street Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 2 10.000 1,800 A Valley Road Sweetwater Road Calle Abajo Collector 2 10,000 7,000 C Source: City of National City, Fehr & Peers: September 2010 Note: Highlighted segments indicate substandard LOS E or F. FEHR PEERS N S U I'IAq 1S f RAMSPORtAA3 �.', NATIONAL C€Tf - ()NA`) •\rV Nationai City Southern Boundary fp FEIIR & PEERS LEGEND Base Layers j City of National City Freeways Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Level of Service (LOS) A-C D NOT TO SCALE EXISTING ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 4-3 City of National City General Plan LIPtiaf January 2011 k�i#IY�Gi'. TABLE 4.2: ON -STREET PARKING ANALYSIS FOR ARTERIAL AND COLLECTOR ROADWAYS Street Name Type Date Observed Time % Occupancy 8th Street Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 50 Plaza Boulevard Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 70 National City Boulevard Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 70 30th Street Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 70 Sweetwater Road Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM No parking Plaza Bonita Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 90 Euclid Avenue Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 70 Division Street Arterial - 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 50 Highland Avenue Arterial 8/3/2009 7-9 AM 50 National City Boulevard Arterial 8/4/2009 4-6 PM 60 Harbor Drive Arterial 8/4/2009 4-6 PM No parking 8th Street Arterial 8/4/2009 4-6 PM 40 Plaza Boulevard Arterial 8/4/2009 4-6 PM 60 Highland Avenue Arterial 8/4/2009 4-6 PM 70 Euclid Avenue Arterial 8/4/2009 4-6 PM 60 Division Street Arterial 8/4/2009 4-6 PM 40 Marina Way Collector 8/4/2009 4-6 PM 40 Hoover Avenue Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 80 Roosevelt Avenue Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 80 Avenue Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 60 L Avenue Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 80 Palm Avenue Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 50 Harbison Avenue Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 50 16th Street Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 30 18th Street Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 80 Granger Way Collector 8/24/2009 4-6 PM 60 Hoover Avenue Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 20 Roosevelt Avenue Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 20 D Avenue Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 70 L Avenue Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 40 Palm Avenue Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 60 Harbison Avenue Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 10 16ih Street Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 60 18th Street Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 80 Granger Way Newell Street Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 50 Collector 8/25/2009 7-9 AM 90 Source: City of National City fliAgSF OR TWON CONiUUA fp FEFIR & PFFR LEGEND Base Layers I ] City o1 National City Freeways n Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Parking Districts Parcels Existing Residential Permit Parking District NOTE. Parking District "B" Was Removed by City Council Action N NOT TC SCALE RESIDENTIAL PERMIT PARKING AREAS FIGURE 4-4 City of National City Ge January 2011 4.4 TRANSIT SERVICES AND FACILITIES National City public transit is provided by the San Diego Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) and consists of public bus and light rail transit (or trolley). The following sections describe each of these modes within National City. Figure 4-5 displays the transit routes and stops serving the City of National City. Trolley System A network of t rolley lines provides ac cess bot h within the C ity of N ational C ity and t o t he gr eater San Diego region. The San Diego Trolley Blue Line has two stops located within the boundaries of National City: at 8th Street and at 24'h Street. Bus System A system of public buses comprised of 10 routes serves the City of National City with a total of 211 bus stops located throughout the City. • Route 13 — Runs from the 24th Street Trolley Station to Grantville. Major National City roadways served include 18`h Street and Euclid Avenue. • Route 929 — Runs through National City. T he route begins on U nion Street in San Diego and then runs to the San Ysidro/ International Border. The major National City roadways served are Main Street and Highland Avenue. • Route 93 2 — Runs f rom t he 8 th Street Trolley S tation to the San Y sidro/ I nternational B order Transit Center. The major National City road served is National City Boulevard. • Route 955 — Runs from the 8'h Street Trolley Station to the SDSU Transit Center. Major National City roadways served include 8th Street, Highland Avenue, and Euclid Avenue. • Route 961 — Runs from the 24`h Street Trolley Station to the Encanto / 62'1 Street Trolley Station. Major National City roadways served include 24th Street, 30th Street, Sweetwater Road, and Plaza Bonita. • Route 9 62 — Runs f rom the 8th Street Trolley Station t o Spring V alley Shopping C enter. Major National City roadways served include Plaza Boulevard and Paradise Valley Road. • Route 963 — Runs from the 8'h Street Trolley Station to Westfield Plaza Bonita. Major National City roads served include Plaza Boulevard, Euclid Avenue, G ranger Avenue, and Sweetwater Road. • Route 967 — Runs from the 24`h Street Trolley Station to Ava Street in Alta Vista. Major National City streets served include 18th Street, D Avenue, Highland Avenue, and Division Street. • Route 968 — Runsfrom the 24`h Street Trolley Station to the Paradise Valley Naval Exchange. Major National City roadways serviced include 18th Street, D Avenue, 4'h Street, and Paradise Valley Road. FEAR & PEER5 TRAH50067ATSti CON3lliTANTS 41[�• 11; 11; 1 !t i1 fp FEH� . & Fttks Nauonai CHUL.A 'Vi5Tfi National City Southern Boundary ). LEGEND Base Layers City of National City Freeways Major Roads Local Roads Railroad --- Streams Transit Stops a Bus Stop e Bus Stop (w/Bench) Bus Stop (w/Bench and Shelter) Trolley Station Transit Routes 13 929 932 955 -- 961 962 963 967 968 Trolley Blue Line NOT TULE TRANSIT ROUTES AND STOPS FIGURE 4-5 City of Nationai City General Pan C January 2011 National City has the second highest public transit ridership rates in San Diego County, slightly less than the C ity of I mperial Beach (US C ensus, 2 005 data). This c an b e explained in par t b y t he f act that approximately 7.4 percent of the owner -occupied households and 24.4 percent of renter occupied households in National City do not own a motor vehicle (US Census, 2000 data). The City is well -served by transit with approximately 96 percent of dwelling units located within a quarter mile of a transit stop (SANDAG GIS data). Figures 4-6 and 4-7 identify the various modes of commute for National City and San Diego County (US Census Community Survey 2005-2008). As shown, approximately 6 .0 percent of N ational C ity c ommuter t rips c urrently us e t ransit, c ompared w ith approximately 3.0 percent for the County as a whole. F%t{R rRAMSAQA IMSpli tTh Figure 4-6 Commute Mode Shares in National City 16% National City 56% j 0 Drove Alone IS Carpooled ❑ Public Transit 0 walk • other Figure 4-7 Commute Mode Shares in San Diego County San Diego County O Drove Alone ®Carpooled O Public Transit Owalk Mother City of National City Gene January 2011 4.5 GOODS MOVEMENT FACILITIES The goods or freight movement system in National City consists of rail lines, designated truck routes, and marine cargo terminals. E ach system i s di scussed bel ow as it relates to t he o peration an d s ervice of transporting freight. Figure 4-8 depicts the network of goods movement facilities within National City. Trucking Routes National City has designated truck haul routes for vehicles exceeding a gross vehicle weight of 6,000 Ibs (3 tons), which may also include height, length, and width restrictions. H eavy vehicles are required to obtain a permit from the City. Truck haul routes facilitate regional goods movements from the freeways or neighboring j urisdictions to k ey des tinations such as t he N ational C ity Marine Cargo T erminal. Truck routes are classified as either primary or secondary routes. Primary routes are generally described as the most direct routes to/from freeways and neighboring jurisdictions. S econdary routes provide a lternate connections to primary routes. Primary Truck Routes within National City include the following 12 roadways: • Tidelands Avenue (Civic Center Drive to Bay Marina Drive) • Harbor Drive (northern City Boundary to Civic Center Drive) • Roosevelt Avenue (northern City Boundary to 8th Street) • National City Boulevard (Mile of Cars Way to 35th Street) • Highland Avenue (northern City Boundary to Plaza Boulevard) • Highland Avenue (301h Street to southern City Boundary) • Euclid Avenue (northern City Boundary to Sweetwater Road) • 81h Street (Harbor Drive to Roosevelt Avenue) • Plaza Bonita Center Way (Valley Road to Sweetwater Road) • Plaza Boulevard/Paradise Valley Road (Highland Avenue to eastern City Boundary) • Bay Marina Drive/Mile of Cars Way (Tidelands Avenue to National City Boulevard) • 301h Street/Sweetwater Road (Highland Avenue to Plaza Bonita Center Way) Secondary Truck Routes include the following 5 roadways: • Roosevelt Avenue (8th Street to Plaza Boulevard) • National City Boulevard (Plaza Boulevard to Mile of Cars Way) • Highland Avenue (Plaza Boulevard to 301h Street) • Civic Center Drive (Harbor Drive to National City Boulevard) • 30`h Street (National City Boulevard to Highland Avenue) FEH.R & F£EI&S IRANSRDATA11DN COMSU&TAB15 Na!i,yral fp F'EHR & I'LGRS 11 ational City uthern Boundary 11 LEGEND Base Layers City of National City Freeways --- Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Truck Haul Routes Primary Route Secondary Route Freeway Overpass Clearance Good For All Roads 7, Freeway Overpass Clearance Pedestrian Bridge Clearance Trolley Station NOT TC SCALE TRUCK HAUL ROUTES FIGURE 4-8 City of National City Generat PI January 2011 Rail Rail lines within National City have been traditionally used to transport lumber, cars, and containers that have entered the country via the Port of San Diego. Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway and San Diego an d I mperial V alley R ailway ar e t he two companies c urrently o perating on t he lines w ithin National City. National City Marine Cargo Terminal The National City Marine Cargo Terminal is one of two marine cargo facilities owned by the Port of San Diego. It is located at the west end of Bay Marina Drive on the National City bayfront. The terminal is a 125-acre complex, with eight cargo berths. The National City Marine Cargo Terminal's main inventory consists of vehicles, lumber, and cargo. The Terminal can handle more than 500,000 vehicles per year. It has six railroad spurs totaling nearly 10,000 linear feet that can accommodate up to 125 conventional/Automax r ailcars. The t erminal h as on -site a uto processing s pecialists, as well as automated cargo tracking and data collection. The National City Marine Cargo Terminal is one of the most advanced vehicle import/export facilities on the West Coast, and a first-rate facility for special break -bulk, heavy equipment, and major project cargo. The facility is operated by Pasha Automotive and D istribution Services, and t he terminal serves as the primary por t of ent ry f or A udi, B entley, H onda, I suzu, M azda, L otus, Mitsubishi F uso, Porsche, a nd Volkswagen. Railroad tracks along the north side of the warehouses connect with BNSF Railway and San Diego & I mperial V alley R ailway. Loading docks are located on t he ea st s ide. The north side of t he facility provides a truck ramp to warehouse floors for convenient loading and delivery. City of National City Gen eiat Plan:Upf January 2011 5. CIRCULATION ELEMENT GOALS AND POLICIES This chapter provides the relevant Goals and Policies that will serve to guide the future development of the C ity's c irculation systems. A s shown, each goal i s s upported b y a s et of m ore s pecific policies to assist in implementing the City's vision. 5.1 LAND USE AND CIRCULATION LINKAGES Goal C-1: Coordinated land use and circulation planning. Policy C-1.1: Allow, encourage, an d f acilitate t ransit-oriented development, m ixed-use, and i nfill projects i n ap propriate locations t o r educe v ehicular t rips, es pecially near t he 8th Street a nd 2 4th Street trolley stops, the future South Bay Bus Rapid Transit Station (BRT), and along major transportation corridors such as 8th Street, Highland Avenue, Plaza Boulevard, and 30th Street/Sweetwater Road. Policy C-1.2: Require new development to provide and enhance connectivity to existing transportation facilities via the provision of key roadway connections, sidewalks, and bicycle facilities. Policy C-1.3: Require n ew development and r edevelopment t o pr ovide go od i nternal c irculation facilities t hat m eets t he needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, c hildren, s eniors, and persons with disabilities. Policy C-1.4: Require new development and redevelopment to apply universal design standards. Policy C-1.5: Work w ith s tate, regional and I ocal t ransportation e ntities t o i mprove and ex pand transportation f acilities a nd s ervices t hat link residents t o i mportant I and us e d estinations s uch as workplaces, schools, community and recreation areas, and shopping opportunities. Policy C-1.6: Exact fees on ne w de velopment and r edevelopment s ufficient t o cover the fair s hare portion of that development's impacts on the local and regional transportation system, including multi - modal facilities, and/or directly mitigate its impacts to the transportation system through construction of improvements. Why is this important? Coordinated planning of land uses and the circulation system aims to ensure the efficient flow of vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, and transit operations within a community. Improvements or changes to the City's circulation s ystem must be considered i n c onjunction with c hanges t o I and use patterns t o ens ure t hat adequate capacity will be accommodated for all modes of transportation. 5.2 MOBILITY FRAMEWORK Goal C-2: A comprehensive circulation system that is safe and efficient for all modes of travel. Policy C-2.1: Develop and maintain an i nterconnected, grid- or modified grid -based transportation system that sustains a variety of multi -modal transportation facilities. Policy C-2.2: Enhance c onnectivity b y e liminating gaps a nd b arriers i n r oadway, b ikeway, an d pedestrian networks. F i- u P E Ea TRANSPORTATION. fOMSI1 AU City of National City Gene January 2011 Policy C-2.3: Strive to attain an automobile LOS D or better (or a equivalent standard under another analytical methodology). An automobile LOS E or F may be acceptable u nder the following circumstances: 1) improvements necessary to attain a automobile LOS D or better would decrease the effectiveness of the non -automotive components of the multi -modal circulation system (i.e. pedestrians, bi cyclists, mass/public t ransit, et c.), or 2) i mprovements nec essary t o i ncrease t he effectiveness of the non -automotive components of the multimodal transportation system result in a decrease in automobile LOS. Policy C-2.4: Work with Caltrans, SANDAG, MTS, and other responsible agencies to identify, plan, and implement needed transportation improvements. Policy C-2.5: Encourage t raffic c irculation i mprovements t hat m inimize I and ac quisition and m ajor construction, s uch as , but not limited t o, e nhanced r oad m arkings, s ynchronized t raffic signals, Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) network management and more left turn restrictions. Policy C-2.6: Enhance t he qua lity of I ife i n t he C ity's ne ighborhoods a nd m inimize i mpacts on schools, hospitals, convalescent homes and of her sensitive facilities through the implementation of traffic calming measures in these areas to reduce vehicle speeds and discourage cut -through traffic. Policy C-2.7: Improve circulation for specific areas of the City such as at the Harbor Drive/Tidelands Avenue/Civic Center Drive Intersection and the area west of National City Boulevard, south of 22nd Street and north of Mile of Cars Way. Policy C-2.8: Implement r oad diets, where a ppropriate, as a m eans t o i mprove s afety, i ncrease efficiency of pi ck-up and drop-off oper ations at s chools, a nd provide gr eater separation between pedestrians and vehicles. Policy C-2.9: Maintain a r oadway c irculation s ystem w ith multiple a Iternative r outes, to t he ex tent feasible, t o e nsure m obility in the e vent of em ergencies, and t o m inimize t he n eed f or c apacity increases on particular streets. As needed, use signage to direct traffic to alternative routes during peak periods. Policy C-2.10: Consider giorietas as an intersection traffic control option, where feasible and appropriate. Policy C-2.11: Maintain safety throughout the circulation system by taking opportunities to introduce a safe design speed of any new roadways or during improvements to existing roads or intersections. Policy C-2.12: Reduce c rash r isk on ar terial s treets b y c onsolidating an d m inimizing dr iveways whenever possible. Why is this important? Recent r evisions i n p lanning 1 aw r ecognize t he importance of pl anning f or m ultiple m odes of transportation, which pr ovide for t he nee ds of al I us ers ( including p edestrians, bi cyclists, m ass t ransit riders, m otorists, et c.). ( See A B 1358 [ 2008]; SB 375 [ 2008].) R ecent r evisions in environmental regulations al so r ecognize t hat t he o verall effectiveness of t he t ransportation s ystem s hould be considered. ( See C alifornia N atural R esources A gency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action: Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB97, December 2009, page 75.) In some instances, deterioration of vehicular level of service may result in improvements to other forms of transportation, such as walking or bicycling, w hich m ay in t urn ha ve be neficial effects r elated t o a it q uality, greenhouse gas emissions, energy c onsumption, a nd health. Walking an d b icycling pr ovide t he additional b enefits of i mproving public health and reducing treatment costs for conditions associated with reduced physical activity including obesity, heart disease, lung disease, and diabetes. FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION LCNSUCAN75 5.3 REGIONAL CIRCULATION PLANNING Goal C-3: Coordination with the regional mobility system. Policy C-3-1: Consult with S ANDAG r egarding up dates t o a nd i mplementation of t he R egional Transportation Plan (RTP). Policy C-3-2: Work with Caltrans and adjacent jurisdictions to plan and implementfuture roadway connections and circulation improvements. Policy C-3.3: Consult with MT S r egarding u pdates t o t he BRT and I ocal bus routes an d r elated activities. Why is this important? The Circulation Element is part of a larger body of plans and programs that guide the development and management of the transportation system. SANDAG, as the regional planning agency is responsible for developing t he R TP, w hich i ncludes a I ong-range v ision f or bus es, t he T rolley, r ail, hi ghways, m ajor streets, bi cycle t ravel, walking, goods m ovement, and ai rport services. S ANDAG al so o versees the planning, f inancial pr ogramming, pr oject dev elopment, and c onstruction f unctions of M TS. Caltrans manages m ore t han 5 0,000 m iles of C alifornia's h ighway and f reeway lanes, pr ovides i nter-city r ail services, and permits public -use airports and special -use hospital heliports. Due to the highly integrated and complex nature of the region's transportation facilities, it is important that local transportation planning efforts be c onsidered with the regional system in orderto attain the greatest efficiencies and benefits for the City. 5.4 TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT Goal C-4: Increased use of alternative modes of travel to reduce peak hour vehicular trips, save energy, and improve air quality. Policy C-4.1: Encourage businesses to provide flexible work schedules for employees. Policy C-4.2: Encourage em ployers t o offer s hared c ommute pr ograms a ndior incentives f or employees to use transit. Policy C-4.3: Require new uses to provide adequate bicycle parking and support facilities. Policy C-4.4: Encourage carpooling and other shared commute programs. Policy C-4.5: Encourage the use of alternative transportation modes. Policy C-4.6: Prioritize at tention t o t ransportation i ssues ar ound s chools f o r educe s chool-related vehicle trips. Policy C-4.7: Seek opp ortunities t o r educe v ehicle t rips bef ore r equiring ph ysical r oadway improvements. Why is this important? Reducing vehicular trips, especially at peak commuting times. can be accomplished through: improvements t o pedestrian c irculation, bi ke and t ransit s ystems; i ncreased us e of c arpooling; an d accommodations m ade b y em ployers t o a !low f or f lexible work s chedules, i ncluding work from ho me FEHR AAMSPORIAT City of National City General Plan January 2011 provisions. Trip reduction, by whichever means, translates into less traffic congestion, fewer greenhouse gas emissions and improved regional and local air quality. 5.5 VEHICULAR PARKING Goal C-5: Parking provided and managed in a way that balances economic development, livable neighborhoods, environmental health, and public safety with a compact, multi -modal environment. Policy C-5.1: Ensure balance among visitor, business, and residential parking needs. Policy C-5.2: Require new d evelopment and r edevelopment t o I ocate of f-street par king f acilities behind storefronts to create a more inviting environment adjacent to the street, where feasible. Policy C-5.3: Require par king I ots t o pr ovide s hade t hrough t he us e of I andscaping ( i.e., a t ree canopy) and additionally encourage the use of solar photovoltaic shading to reduce the heat island effect, where feasible. Policy C-5.4: Where app ropriate, pr ovide o n-street di agonal p arking t o i ncrease t he number o f spaces and slow traffic to create more pedestrian -friendly streets. Policy C-5.5: Require the use of universal design standards in parking design and compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act accessibility guidelines. Policy C-5.6: Provide clearly marked pedestrian paths between on -street parking, off-street parking facilities, and the buildings they serve, where feasible. Policy C-5.7: Allow for shared parking and parking requirement reductions for mixed -use and transit - oriented development. Policy C-5.8: Establish parking time limitations, where appropriate. Policy C-5.9: Establish public parking fees, where appropriate. Policy C-5.10: Require new development and redevelopment to provide sufficient parking. In determining what constitutes sufficient parking, the City may take into consideration: 1) the overall effectiveness of the circulation system as a whole ( i.e., pedestrians, bicyclists, motorized vehicles, etc.): 2) t he par ticular nee ds of a s pecific I ocation a nd/or pr oject, an d 3) t he need f or i ncreased densities and mixed -use development intended to aid in the reduction of personal vehicle use and the corresponding reduction in air pollution, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and other environmental effects. Why is this important? Adequate parking is essential for both residents and visitors and to the economic viability of commercial establishments within a community. However, c oncentrated parking ar eas can create s ubstantial environmental impacts i ncluding, but n of I imited t o, hot -spots and increased stormwater r un-off and pollution. Parking lots can also interfere with pedestrian and bicycle circulation. Balancing demand with these other concerns is critical to planning for parking within the community. Ft:iIR c PEER3.5 TAAASPORTATtON CONS9i7ANIS City of National City Gene January 2011 5.6 GOODS MOVEMENT Goal C-6: A safe and efficient system for the movement of goods that supports commerce while enhancing the livability of the community. Policy C-6.1: Work with the responsible and affected agencies to enhance infrastructure to facilitate timely m ovement of goods and s ecurity of t rade, including f acilities us ed f or of ficient i ntermodal transfer between truck, rail, and marine transport. Policy C-6.2: Enforce the use of designated truck routes for both local and regional goods transport. Policy C-6.3: Work with the responsible and affected agencies to improve the roadway connection between Tidelands Avenue and Harbor Drive for greater efficiency of freight goods movement. Policy C-6-4: Work w ith r ailroad o perators t o f acilitate t he t ransport of goo ds b y r ail t hrough t he community by coordinating schedules to minimize impacts during peak travel periods. Policy C-6-5: Work with the Port District on land use and transportation planning efforts to mitigate impacts and improve goods movement related to the marine terminal. Whv is this important? The San D iego r egion p lays a n i mportant nat Tonal r ole i n t he m ovement of g oods t hrough both t he presence of the Port and the proximity of the U.S.-Mexican border. Efficient movement of goods via car, truck, rail, air or marine transport is vital to the economic health of the community and entire region. 5.7 PUBLIC TRANSIT Goal C-7: Increased use of transit systems. Policy C-7.1: Encourage responsible agencies to provide a well designed transit system that meets the needs of the community, commerce, and visitors. Policy C-7.2: Improve bus stop and shelter facilities to increase the comfort of users. Policy C-7.3: Provide m ulti-modal s upport facilities n ear and to/from transit stops for bicyclists and pedestrians, including children and youth, the seniors, and persons with disabilities. Policy C-7.4: Encourage transit providers to post route maps and pick up/drop off times at each stop. Policy C-7.5: Work with transit providers to maintain and e nhance services within the City that are timely, cost-effective, and responsive to growth and redevelopment. Policy C-7.6: Encourage r esponsible agencies an d affected bus inesses t o pr ovide s huttle s ervice between transit stations to major activity centers such as Plaza Bonita. Policy C-7.7: Work with responsible agencies to provide convenient bus stop locations. Why is this important? Expanding use of the transit system w ill help the community meet numerous goals and objectives set forth i n t he G eneral P Ian i ncluding, i ncreasing m ability, preserving an d e nhancing neighborhood character, i mproving ai r q uality, r educing s torm w ater r unoff, reducing p aved s urfaces, and f ostering compact development and a more walkable city. Esc. PEERS ATM CON51104103 l'a City of National City Gene January 2011 5.8 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Goal C-8: A universally accessible, safe, and convenient pedestrian system that encourages walking. Policy C-8.1: Provide connectivity of wide, well -lit walking environments with safety buffers between pedestrians and vehicular traffic, when feasible. Policy C-8.2: Require new development and redevelopment to incorporate pedestrian -oriented street designs that provide a pleasant environment for walking. Policy C-8.3: Identify and implement necessary pedestrian improvements with special emphasis on providing safe access to schools, parks, community and recreation centers shopping districts, and other appropriate facilities. Policy C-8.4: Promote walking as the primary travel mode to schools. Policy C-8.5: Improve pedestrian safety at intersections and mid -block crossings. Policy C-8.6: Reduce architectural barriers t hat r estrict f ull m ovement an d ac cess b y I ess m obile segments of the population consistent with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Policy C-8.7: Apply universal design standards to the pedestrian system. Policy C-8.8: Provide a continuous pedestrian network within and between neighborhoods to facilitate pedestrian travel free from major impediments and obstacles. Why is this important? Improving the pedestrian system through enhancements t o walkability — more attractive s treetscapes, continuous, well -paved sidewalks, proximity of destinations, adequate lighting, safe street crossings, etc., is found to encourage pedestrian activity within the community. A n increased reliance on walking and decreased reliance on vehicular transport poses both health and environmental benefits. 5.9 BIKEWAYS Goal C-9: A safe, comprehensive and integrated bikeway system that encourages bicycling. Policy C-9.1: Expand and i mprove t he b ikeway s ystem and f acilities b y es tablishing b ike I anes, separated paths, and bicycle storage facilities at major destinations. Policy C-9.2: Require new development and redevelopment to provide safe, secure bicycle parking facilities. Policy C-9.3: Require new development and redevelopment to provide connections to existing and proposed bicycle routes, where appropriate. Policy C-9.4: Encourage ex isting bus inesses and n ew de velopment or r edevelopment pr ojects t o promote bicycling and provide bike rack facilities, personal lockers, and shower rooms. Policy C-9.5: Encourage bicycling through education and promotion programs in conjunction with the local school districts. FEH1z, & PEERS INABSPOAIATIO, COXiULTAX15 Cily of National January 2011 ify General Plan 1.1, Policy C-9.6: Keep abreast of bi cycle facility innovations in other c ities an d r egions, an d s eek t o incorporate these into the bicycle network. Why is this important? Bicycling pr ovides a very viable a Iternative to m ost i n-town t rips t hat ar e typically t aken b y c ar, if t he necessary infrastructure to provide for cyclist safety is in place. Bicycling offers many benefits to both the community and the individual cyclist. Bicycling is a non-polluting and sustainable form of transportation that with greater use can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the city's carbon footprint. Also, it serves as a form of physical activity, resulting in health benefits for the cyclist. I EHR & PEERS f RA115,0,AllUN CON5Ul7AN75 City of National City General Plan Update — Circulation i<lemei January 2011 6. FUTURE YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS This chapter presents the assessment of future year 2030 o perating conditions on the City's circulation network. While the majority of the analysis is focused on f uture roadway conditions, an assessment of future transit and non -motorized travel (bike and pedestrian) and goods movements opportunities is also provided. 6.1 BICYCLES FACILITIES One of the goals for this Circulation Element Update is to create a safe, comprehensive and integrated bikeway s ystem t hat w ould enc ourage bicycling. T wo of t he i mplementation measures related t o t his effort are updating the current Bicycle Master Plan and establishing a community corridor system. 6.1.1 Bicycle Master Plan The City's Bicycle Master Plan is in the process of being updated and the results will be incorporated into the updated Circulation Element. Figure 6-1 displays the proposed bicycle facilities. 6.1.2 Community Corridors On September 30, 2008, the State approved Assembly Bill 1358 — The Complete Streets Act. This bill requires, commencing January 1, 2011, that the legislative body of a city or county, upon any substantive revision of t he c irculation el ement of t he g eneral plan, m odify t he c irculation el ement t o plan f or a balanced, m ultimodal t ransportation ne twork t hat meets t he ne eds of al I us ers of streets, r oads, and highways, defined to include motorists, pedestrians, bicyclists, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial goods, and users of public transportation, in a manner that is suitable to the rural, suburban, or urban context of the general plan. By requiring new duties of local officials, this bill would impose a state -mandated local program. In I ight of AB 1358. a community corridor system throughout the C ity of National C ity is proposed as a part of this Circulation Element Update. The community corridor system is a network of well connected multimodal s treets t hat e nables all us ers ( pedestrians, bi cyclists, t ransit r iders and m otorists) to safely move along in the circulation network. The three primary objectives of implementing community corridors are t o c alm t raffic, t o enh ance s afety a nd ac cess f or pedes trian and bicyclist, as w ell as t o pr omote walkability and improve quality of life through functional and attractive streetscaping. Several measures or considerations were employed for determining the City's community corridor facilities, including: • Pedestrian Safety and Access • Vehicle Speeds • Bicycle Network Connectivity • Parking Demand • Proximity to Schools, Parks and Transit Centers • Adjacent Land Uses and Property Access • Revitalization and Smart Growth Redevelopments (such as 8th Street Smart Growth Revitalization project from the Trolley Station to D Avenue) A variety of community corridor features are proposed, include number of travel lane reduction, lane width reduction, angled parking, Class II bicycle lane pair with parallel parking on one side or both sides, and sidewalk w idening. D etailed t ypical cr oss-sections f or t hese C ommunity C orridors ar e i ncluded in Appendix A. iaeasvocIeTron CORiUtTAXIs City of National City General Plan tipdaf GitDtrtatk n E1 menL Teehm January 2011 ='�_arrre�[rk�tll�i Figure 6-2 illustrates t he pr oposed c ommunity c orridors as an i ntegral c omponent of the C ity's transportation network. The proposed corridors are: North -South Corridors • Wilson Avenue, between Civic Center Drive and 22nd Street • Coolidge Avenue, between Plaza Boulevard and 18`h Street • Roosevelt Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard • National City Boulevard, between Division Street and 30th Street • D Avenue, between 4th Street and 30th Street • F Avenue, between 18th Street and 28th Street • Highland Avenue, between Division Street and 8th Street • L Avenue, between 16'h Street and 28'h Street • Palm Avenue, between 4'h Street and 22nd Street • Newell Street, between le Street and 22"d Street • Grove Street, between 18'h Street and 22"d Street • Lanoitan Avenue, between 16'h Street and 24th Street • Granger Avenue, between 18'h Street and 24'h Street • Harbison Avenue, between 4°i Street and 16'h Street East-West Corridors • 4th Street, between National City Boulevard and Harbison Avenue • 8th Street, between Harbor Drive and Paradise Valley Road • Plaza Boulevard, between Coolidge Avenue and D Avenue • 12'h Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue • Civic Center Drive, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard • 15'h Street, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard • 16'h Street, between National City Boulevard and Harbison Avenue • 18th Street, between Wilson Avenue and Granger Avenue • 22nd Street, between Wilson Avenue and Grove Street • 24'h Street, between Lanoitan Avenue and Granger Avenue • 26'h Street, between D Avenue and F Avenue • 28th Street, between F Avenue and L Avenue • 30'h Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue Recreational trails are also proposed as part of the community corridor system to improve connection and circulation for non -motorized travel. Two recreation trails are proposed, including one along Paradise Creek, and the other one along 1-805 and Las Palmas Park. FEHR & PF[RS FRA4SPO TM $ cm+s'Jt AN1S National City Southern Boundary fp FEAR & PEERS e,,C111a11.ox ro vsui iavn 1 LEGEND Base Layers i j City of National City Freeways Major Roads Local Roads -+--�—+ Railroad Streams Proposed Bicycle Network _,.a. Bike Path (Class I) Bike Lane (Class II) Bike Route (Class III) Proposed Bicycle Network Outside National City Bike Path (Class I) Bike Lane (Class II) Bike Route (Class III) N NOT TC SCALE PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES FIGURE 6-1 - 'f FEHR & PEER -,AMS,REA,ION roxwLTAI. National City Southern Boundary LEGEND Base Layers . City of National City --- — Freeways -- Major Roads Local Roads Railroad • Streams Community Corridors Combination of Modes Non -Motorized Only et Proposed Recreation Trails NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS FIGURE 6-2 City of National City Gene January 2011 6.2 PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The c ommunity c orridor s ystem di scussed i n t he p revious s ection would improve p edestrian s afety, connectivity, and access. In addition to the community corridor system, the concept of street conversions, such as w hat was do ne w ith 9th street t o c reate Mor gan S quare, i s a 'so pr oposed. Street c onversions allow f or t he c reation of gr een s paces/pocket par ks, enhanc e pedestrian e nvironment, and/ or r educe neighborhood cut -through traffic. 6.2.1 Street Conversions Approximately 30 potential street conversion sites were initially selected by the Project Team. A set of street conversion evaluation criteria were developed to evaluate circulation and traffic operations. These criteria were employed along with input from the Project Team, City Council, fire department, as well as residents. A final s et of street c onversion locations w ere selected as s hown i n Figure 6-3, Street Conversion Location Map. Detailed evaluations/analyses of circulation impacts at these locations were subsequently conducted. The following summarizes the results of the street conversion analyses and provides a brief description of the pros and cons of each street conversion site. Evaluation Criteria The br oader I ist of pot ential street c onversions w ere s creened us ing c irculation and traffic oper ation related evaluation criteria, as well as community input to derive a final set for more detailed evaluations. The criteria were categorized into four (4) main aspects: circulation, access, safety, and parking. Each category of criteria included considerations of more detailed items as listed below: Criteria 1: Circulation • Street Classification • Street Network Connectivity • Diverted Traffic Volumes (High, Medium, Low) • Alternative Parallel Routes • Designated Bus/Bicycle Routes Criteria 2: Access • Driveways/Alleys (property access) • Type/Density of Adjacent Land Uses • Emergency Vehicle Access F1:LIR }Ra,3 P0B'rv10 P[[RS ONSU«Iar1 IS Kimball 1 FEHR & PEERS El Toyon!Rancho - De LaNacion \\� Palmer Way •C� Las Palmas Lincoln Acres Olivewood ti A 1! , 1. 1► National City Southern Boundary LEGEND -�... Base Layers '-1 National City Planning —•� Area Boundary Freeways -- Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Neighborhood Boundary Potential Sites 1. Hoover Ave south of 18th St 2. West Ave between 16th St and 18th St 3. Hoover Ave between 22nd St and Mile of Cars 4. 12th St east of Palm Ave 5. F Ave south of 18th St 6. Kimball Wy between the Walmart Driveway and F St 7. Q Ave between La Posada and Delta St Ncr TO SCALE STREET CONVERSION KEY MAP FIGURE 6-3 City of National City Genera] t January 2011 Criteria 3: Safety • Reconfiguration of Roadways/Intersections • Traffic Calming • Vehicle/Pedestrian Conflicts Criteria 4: Parking • Parking Demand • Net Change in Parking Supply • Alternative Parking Supply. Based on the above evaluation c riteria and Project T eam i nput, s even (7) street c onversion locations were identified for further consideration. More detailed circulation impact analyses were then conducted to identify potential impacts of each of the proposed street conversions on circulation, access, safety and parking, as summarized below for each street conversion site. Site 1: Hoover Avenue, South of 18Th Street The proposed street conversion is located along Hoover Avenue south of 181h Street to the terminus of that portion of the street at Paradise Creek. Paradise Creek Educational Park is located at the end of this street. Kimball Elementary School is located west of the site and auto -related businesses are located to the east on either side of Paradise Creek. This conversion site was previously studied by the City, and therefore no further analysis was required. Site 2: West Avenue between 161h Street and 18th Street The proposed street conversion is located along West Avenue between 16th Street and 18th Street. The existing businesses on both sides of the street are auto -related services that are accessible from streets other than West Avenue. Paradise Creek, which runs underground from Kimball Park, is exposed on the west s ide of West Avenue, providing a v iew a long the c reek to 18 th Street where it goes un derground again. This conversion site was previously studied by the City, and therefore no further analysis was required. Site 3: Hoover Avenue between 22'd Street and Miles of Cars Wav The pr oposed street c onversion i s a long H oover Avenue between 22"`' Street and M iles of C ars Way. The site is located in Kimball community. Circulation Review Hoover Avenue is a local street, and carries moderate traffic volume. Based on the data provided by City, the A DT v olume al ong t he roadway s egment i s approximately 3,000 vehicles p er da y. With t he street conversion, traffic would be diverted to nearby alternate routes. The nearest parallel facility to Hoover Avenue is National City Boulevard (approximately 650 feet to the east). The existing ADT is 13,300 along National City Boulevard between 16th Street and 24 th Street is currently operating at LOS A. With the street conversion, an additional 3,000 vehicles would shift from Kimball Way to National City Boulevard, which will result in a total ADT of 16,300 vehicles per day (@ LOS B). PEERS e NSUOAN15 City of National City Genetr January 2011 It should be noted that the MTS Route 13 currently operates along Hoover Avenue. Furthermore, based on the current City of National City Bicycle Plan, Hoover Avenue is also a designated bicycle route. Thus the street conversion would impact both bus operations and access to a bicycle facility. Access Review Although the conversion at Hoover Avenue would close the driveway access to the nearby parking lots, there i s alternative a Ileyway f or ac cessing the par king s ites. T he pr oposed street conversion w ould therefore not have any significant impacts on property access. Safety Review A linear pocket park at this location would improve pedestrian safety significantly. Parking Review A num ber of on -street par king s paces w ould be eliminated due t o t his s treet c onversion, ho wever, adequate parking supply would be provided in the adjacent parking lots. Site 4: 12"' Street East of Palm Avenue (Ccil Plaza Boulevard) The proposed street conversion is along 12th Street east of Palm Avenue, which is located in Las Palmas community. The conversion is proposed to end approximately 100 feet or less east of Palm Avenue. Circulation/Safety Review 12th Street is a local street which carries very low traffic volume. Based on the traffic counts conducted in February 2010, the ADT volume along this segment is approximately 320 vehicles per day. With the street conversion, traffic would be diverted to the nearby alternate routes, without causing capacity issues to them. The nearest parallel facility to 12th Street is 11'h Street, which is located approximately 300 feet on the north side. In addition, 12th Street serves as the fifth leg atthe intersection of Palm Avenue and Plaza Boulevard, which only allows right turn onto northbound Palm Avenue. With the conversion, the fifth leg would be removed, and he nce would i mprove t raffic oper ations at t he i ntersection, as well as pedes trian an d vehicular safety. Access Review Since the proposed conversion would end j ust west of the first driveway along 12th Street, no property access i ssues ar e ant icipated. T his s ection of t he street would r emain open f or e mergency vehicle access only. Parking Review According t o t he c onceptual p Ian of t he street c onversion, a pproximately 6 o n-street parking spaces would be eliminated. Consequently, the proposed street conversion would result in a net loss of 6 on - street parking space. Site 5: F Avenue south of 18,h Street The proposed street conversion is located in John Otis community. 'pA*SPU TAISON C PSULtagts_--- City of National City General Plan l pdafe—Circul- January 2011 Circulation Review This segment is a local street and carries low traffic volumes. Based on the traffic counts conducted in February 2010, the ADT volume along F Avenue (south of 18" Street) is approximately 1,690 vehicles per day. With the street conversion, the affected traffic would be di verted to the n earby alternate routes, including E Avenue (300 feet to the west) and Highland Avenue (300 feet to the east). Alley access to nearby pr operties i s al so av ailable. The s treet c onversion is t herefore not anticipated t o have any significant impacts on traffic circulation. Access Review Since the proposed conversion would end just north of the first driveways along F Avenue, no property access issues are anticipated. Safety Review A school is I ocated adjacent to the conversion site and t he proposed conversion would improve pedestrian safety (both for residents and students). Parking Review Approximately 28 on -street parking spaces would be eliminated. H owever, according to a conceptual plan of the street conversion, the street would be striped for parallel parking on both sides, which would provide 21 additional parking spaces. As a r esult, the proposed street conversion would result in a n et loss of approximately 7 on -street parking spaces. Site 6: Kimball Way from Wal-Mart driveway to iust west of F Avenue The proposed street conversion is located along Kimball Way between the Wal-Mart driveway and west of F Avenue, and would create a pedestrian connection along Paradise Creek. The site is located in John Otis community. Circulation Review Kimball Way is a local street close to Paradise Creek which carries moderate traffic volumes. The ADT volume t raveling a long K imball Way ( between the Wal-Mart dr iveway an d F Avenue) i s ap proximately 3,560 vehicles per day. With the street conversion, the affected traffic would be diverted to the nearby alternate routes. The closest parallel facilities to Kimball Way are Plaza Boulevard to the north and 16 Street to the south_ It is assumed that the existing traffic along Kimball Way would be evenly shifted to the of orementioned al ternate routes, with a n additional 1, 780 v ehicles p er d ay added to both Plaza Boulevard and 16" Street. As shown in Table 6.1, Plaza Boulevard would still operate at LOS B with the implementation of the proposed street conversion, similar to existing conditions. 16" St is anticipated to operate at LOS D under street conversion conditions, which is still acceptable according to the City's LOS threshold. Therefore, it can be concluded that the conversion would not have any negative impacts on traffic circulation. Access Review With the proposed street conversion, traffic currently using Kimball Way to access the Wal-Mart would have to access Highland Avenue. FEHR _ P i NAASF PP TM MS! CONS City of National City General Plan Upda January 2011 TABLE 6.1: SITE 6 STREET CONVERSION LOS Alternative Street Segment Classification Lanes Existing' With Street Conversion ADT LOS ADT LOS Plaza Blvd D Ave — Highland Ave Secondary Arterial 4 10,200 B 11,980 B 16th St D Ave — Highland Ave Collector 2 6,600 C 8,380 D Note. ' Existing ADT and LOS is based on Background Report, 2009. Safety Review The conversion is a [so ex pected t o improve p edestrian s afety f or r esidents and t he adjacent s enior community. Parking Review The conversion would not impact parking in any manner. Site 7: Q Avenue between La Posada Street and Delta Street The proposed street conversion is located along Q Avenue between La Posada Street and Delta Street. in the El Toyon/Rancho de la Nacion community. Circulation Review Q Avenue is a local street that only serves minimal residential units and carries very low traffic volumes. With t he street c onversion, t he affected t raffle w ould be di verted t o t he near by a Iternative r outes. S Avenue is located to the east of Q Avenue and would be the nearest parallel facility. Given the low traffic volumes, no resulting circulation impacts would be anticipated. Access Review There i s no dr iveway/alley access I ocated along the proposed c onversion site (Q A venue), thus there would be no impact on access to adjacent properties. Safety Review The conversion site is I ocated in a r esidentiai neighborhood a nd would i mprove p edestrian s afety for surrounding residents. Parking Review The street conversion w ould el iminate approximately 2 0 on -street par king spaces al ong Q Avenue. However, according to the conceptual plan of the street conversion, 4 additional parking spaces would be provided at t he nor th end of t he c losure ( adjacent to La P osada). T herefore, t he pr oposed street conversion would result in a net loss of approximately 16 on -street parking spaces. FI:IIR PEERS IRANSFORTATItri C4NitniyN13 City of National City Gen January 2011 6.3 ROADWAY NETWORK This section summarizes the future year traffic modeling and analyses which were conducted to support the City's proposed Circulation Element roadway network. Analyses were conducted on both the adopted and proposed Circulation Elements. 6.3.1 Adopted Circulation Element This s cenario r epresents y ear 20 30 I and us es an d t ravel d emands as signed t o t he C ity's c urrently adopted Circulation Element network. Figure 6-4 illustrates the City's currently a dopted C irculation E lement network and roadway functional classifications. The adopted network is largely similar to the existing network with a few exceptions, as follows: • Wilson Avenue, between 22nd Street and Mile of Cars is classified as a 2-lane Collector (Existing - 1-lane Collector), • 8`h Street, between National City Boulevard and H ighland Avenue is classified as a 2-lane with two-way left -turn lane Collector (Existing — 4-lane Arterial), • Plaza Boulevard, between Coolidge Avenue and Hoover Avenue is classified as 2-lane Collector (Existing - 1-lane Collector), • Plaza Boulevard, between Highland Avenue and Euclid Avenue is classified as a 6-lane Arterial (Existing — 4-lane Arterial), and • Sweetwater Road, between Calmoor Street and Plaza Bonita Center Way is classified as a 4- lane Arterial (Existing - a 2-lane with two-way left -turn lane Collector). Level of Service was calculated for the key roadway segments to evaluate the future year 2030 traffic conditions under the adopted Circulation Element. Table 6.2 shows the results of the roadway Level of Service ana lysis, w hile Figure 6-5 displays the results in a m apped format. A s s hown, the following roadway s egments (22 i n t otal) ar e pr ojected t o o perate at LOS E o r F under year 2 030 a dopted Circulation Element Plan: • Wilson Avenue, between Civic Center Drive and 18th Street (LOS F), • Wilson Avenue. between 18th Street and 22nd Street (LOS F), • Roosevelt Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard (LOS E), • Palm Avenue, between Division Street and 4th Street (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between 4th Street and 8th Street (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between Plaza Boulevard and 16th Street (LOS F), • Division Street, between D Avenue and Highland Avenue (LOS F), • 4th Street. between National City Boulevard and D Avenue (LOS E), • 4ih Street. between Palm Avenue and Euclid Avenue (LOS E), F£(i .& P E i&S i%ANSF0AtATIO' CONSULTANTS City of National City General Pla January 2011 • 4th Street, between Euclid Avenue and Harbison Avenue (LOS E), • 8th Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue (LOS E), • Plaza Boulevard, between Coolidge Avenue and Hoover Avenue (LOS E), • Plaza Boulevard, between School Xing and Harbison Avenue (LOS E), • 16th Street, between L Avenue and Palm Avenue (LOS F), • 16th Street, between Palm Avenue and Euclid Avenue (LOS F), • 18th Street, between L Avenue and Palm Avenue (LOS F), • 18th Street, between Palm Avenue and Newell Street (LOS E), • 18th Street, between Newell Street and Euclid Avenue (LOS F), • 18th Street, between Euclid Avenue and Rachael Avenue (LOS E), • 22nd Street, between Wilson Avenue and Hoover Avenue (LOS E), and • 22nd Street, between Hoover Avenue and National City Boulevard (LOS F). FEHR IRAK3t0$7A l: E RS .045140ANT-5- NAL CITY :N A 1 FEHR & PIERS ational City outhem Boundary LEGEND Base Layers j City of National City Freeways Major Roads Local Roads �--�� Railroad Streams Roadway Classifications OMMOU Arterial Collector NCT TO SCALE ADOPTED ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS FIGURE 6-4 City of National City General Plan Upd. January 2011 TABLE 6.2: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ADOPTED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity 40,000 ADT LOS Harbor Drive Division Street 8th Street Arterial 4 26,100 C Harbor Drive 8th Street Civic Center Drive Arterial 4 40,000 18,500 B Tidelands Avenue Civic Center Drive 19th Street Collector 2 10,000 5,500 B Tidelands Avenue 19th Street Bay Marina Drive Collector 2 10,000 4,000 A Tidelands Avenue Bay Marina Drive 32"d Street Collector 2 10,000 2,800 A Marina Way Bay Marina Drive 32"tl Street Collector 2+1 15,000 7,000 B Cleveland Avenue Civic Center Drive 19th Street Collector 2+1 15,000 5,000 A Cleveland Avenue 19th Street Bay Marina Drive Collector 2+1 15,000 5,100 B Wilson Avenue 22ntl Street Mile of Cars Way Collector 2 10,000 5,800 C Hoover Avenue 8th Street 18th Street Collector 2 10,000 8,800 D Hoover Avenue 22" Street Mile of Cars Way Collector 4 20,000 7,000 A Hoover Avenue Miles of Cars Way 30th Street Collector 4 20,000 14,300 D Hoover Avenue 30th Street 33rd Street Collector 2 10,000 4,200 B Roosevelt Avenue Division Street 4th Street Collector 2 10,000 8,100 D Roosevelt Avenue 4th Street 8th Street Collector 2 10,000 8,100 D RobseveFtAvenue 8ih Street Plaza Boulevard Co leCfor 2 10 000 9700 - E Roosevelt Avenue Plaza Boulevard Civic Center Drive Collector 2 10,000 6,400 C Roosevelt Avenue Civic Center Drive 16th Street Collector 2 10,000 4,600 B West Avenue 16thStreet 18'h Street Collector 2 10,000 6,600 C National City Boulevard Division Street 4th Street Arterial 4 40,000 16,500 B National City Boulevard 4m Street 8th Street Arterial 4 40,000 16.000 B National City Boulevard 8'h Street Plaza Boulevard Arterial 4 40,000 19,800 B National City Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Civic Center Drive Arterial 4 40,000 15,200 B National City Boulevard Civic Center Drive 16th Street Arterial 4 40,000 16,700 B National City Boulevard 16th Street 18th Street Arterial 4 40,000 14,800 A National City Boulevard 18th Street 22n" Street Arterial 4 40,000 17,500 B National City Boulevard 22nd Street 24th Street Arterial 4 40.000 16,100 B • FEAR z PE.ERS TRAKSP DATATIO t ONSU ',NIS City of National City General Plan Updat January 2011 TABLE 6.2: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ADOPTED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes ADT Capacity ADT LOS National City Boulevard National City Boulevard 24'h Street 30th Street Arterial 4 40,000 22,800 30th Street 35th Street Arterial 4 40,000 22,800 C C D Avenue Division Street 4th Street Collector 2 10,000 4,900 B D Avenue 4th Street 8th Street Collector 2 10,000 8,200 D Avenue 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 6,400 D Avenue D Avenue D Avenue Plaza Boulevard 16th Street 18th Street 16th Street 18th Street Collector 2 10,000 8,200 D Collector 2 10,000 8,500 22" Street Collector 2 10,000 6,100 D Avenue 22nd Street 24th Street Collector 2 10,000 5,600 C D Avenue 24th Street 30th Street Collector 2 10,000 6,600 C Highland Avenue Delta Street Division Street Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Division Street 4th Street Arterial Arterial 4 40,000 18,100 4 30,000 16,900 4th Street 8th Street Highland Avenue Highland Avenue 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Arterial Arterial 16th Street Arterial 4 4 4 30,000 40,000 40,000 16,200 22,600 20,000 B C C C B Highland Avenue 16th Street 18th Street Arterial 4 40,000 2 3, 500 C Highland Avenue 18th Street Highland Avenue Highland Avenue 24th Street 30th Street 24th Street 30th Street Arterial Arterial 4 30,000 21,600 D 4 30,000 23,400 D SR-54 Arterial 4 40,000 33,600 D L Avenue 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 3,900 A L Avenue 16th Street 18th Street Collector 2 10,000 4.000 L Avenue L Avenue 18th Street 24th Street 24th Street 30th Street Collector 2 10,000 6.200 Collector 2 10,000 3.900 A C A Palm Avenue Palm Avenue Newell Street 1-805 16th Street Division Street 18th Street 18th Street Prospect Street Arterial Collector Collector 4 2 40,000 10,000 23,400 8,300 C D 2 10,000 7,100 C Grove Street Prospect Street Sweetwater Road Collector 2 10,000 7,600 D Euclid Avenue Euclid Avenue Cervantes Avenue Division Street Division Street 4th Street Arterial 4 30,000 12,600 Arterial 4 30,000 10,400 B B Euclid Avenue 4th Street 8th Street Arterial 40,000 16,700 B Fei-iti & PELEL TRANSPORTATION CUNSULTANIS City of National City General P1 January 2011 TABLE 6.2: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ADOPTED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity ADT LOS Euclid Avenue 8m Street Plaza Boulevard Arterial 4 30,000 15,900 C Euclid Avenue Plaza Boulevard 16th Street Arterial 4 30,000 14,300 C Euclid Avenue 161h Street 18th Street Arterial 4 30,000 8,800 A Euclid Avenue 18th Street 24`h Street Arterial 4 30,000 9.400 A Euclid Avenue 241E Street Sweetwater Road Arterial 4 30,000 13,200 B Harbison Avenue Division Street 4th Street Collector 2 10,000 4,400 B Harbison Avenue 4th Street 8th Street Collector 2 10,000 4,000 A Harbison Avenue 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 11,200 C Harbison Avenue Plaza Boulevard 16th Street Collector 2 10,000 5.800 C Plaza Bonita Road Sweetwater Road Bonita Mesa Road Arterial 4 40,000 18,900 B Plaza Bonita Center Way SR-54 Sweetwater Road Arterial 4 40,000 27,400 C Division Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Collector 2+1 15,000 12,000 D Division Street Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 10,800 B Division Street Palm Avenue Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 18,300 B Division Street Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 15,500 C 4Street Nationat Cty Boulevard DAvenue Collector 2 10,000 9,70t} E ;; 41h Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 2 10,000 7,900 D 41h Street Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Collector 2 10,000 7,700 D 41h Street - Palm Avenue ' Euclid Avenue Collector 2 10 00 _: 9,200- E _ 4th Street Euclid Avenue Harli1Son Avenue r,_ Collector 2 10,000 - 9,100- . E 8`h Street Harbor Drive 1-5 Arterial 4 30,000 13,900 B 8thStreet1-5 National City Boulevard Arterial 4 40,000 29,700 C 8� Street National Citi Boulevard DAvenue Collector . _ 2+1 15,000 T 14,800 E 81h Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 2+1 15,000 9,200 C 81h Street Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 20,200 D 8th Street Palm Avenue Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 19,700 C 8th Street Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 16,900 C 8thStreet Harbison Avenue Paradise Valley Road Arterial 4 40,000 15,000 C P(eza Boulevard Coolidge Avenue Hoover Avenue = _: Collector 2 10,000 9,900 Plaza Boulevard Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 12.200 C FH-Iit IRAi1S70R TAT City of National City Genera! Plan Upda January 2011 TABLE 6.2: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ADOPTED GP — YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street From Plaza Boulevard National City Boulevard Plaza Boulevard D Avenue Plaza Boulevard Highland Avenue To Classification D Avenue Lanes ADT Capacity ADT LOS Arterial 4 30,000 21,100 Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 20,400 Palm Avenue Arterial 6 50,000 20,300 B Plaza Boulevard Palm Avenue 1-805 Arterial 6 50,000 32,400 C Plaza Boulevard 1-805 Euclid Avenue Arterial 6 50,000 37,700 C Plaza Boulevard Euclid Avenue Plaza Boulevard School Xing Paradise Valley Road Civic Center Drive 18 Street 19th Street 22"4 Street, National City Boulevard D Avenue Highland Avenue Euelid Avenue Tidelands Avenue Wilson:Avenue FHIR & PiERS TFANSPOF TASlON CONSULTANTS School Xing Arterial 4 40,000 29,800 C Harbison Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 26,7 Wilson Avenue National City Boulevard National City Boulevard Rachael Avenue Wilson Avenue Hoover Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 27,200 Collector Collector Collector City of National City General Ran UJfartdt - Lire January 2011 TABLE 6.2: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ADOPTED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity ADT LOS Bay Marina Drive Tidelands Avenue Marina Way Collector 4 20,000 6,300 A Bay Marina Drive Marina Way Cleveland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 12,100 B Bay Marina Drive Cleveland Avenue 1-5 Arterial 4 30.000 12,400 B Mile of Cars Way 1-5 Wilson Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 27,600 C Mile of Cars Way Wilson Avenue Hoover Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 22,600 C Mile of Cars Way Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Arterial 4 40.000 15,800 B 24th Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Arterial 4 30.000 14,000 B 24th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 8,800 A 24th Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Collector 2 10,000 5,100 B 30th Street Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 4,000 A 30th Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 10,100 B 30th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 18,300 C 30`h Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 24,600 C 30'h Street L Avenue 2" Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 22,900 C Sweetwater Road 2od Avenue Grove Street Arterial 4 40,000 29,100 C Sweetwater Road Grove Street I-805/Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 32,400 D Sweetwater Road I-805/Euclid Avenue Valley Road Arterial 4 40,000 33,500 D Sweetwater Road Valley Road Plaza Bonita Road Arterial 6 50,000 26,900 B Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Road Calmoor Street Arterial 4 40,000 24,300 C Sweetwater Road Calmoor Street Plaza Bonita Center Way Arterial 4 30,000 19,600 C 33rd Street Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 2 10,000 4,200 B Valley Road Sweetwater Road Calle Abajo Collector 2 10,000 7,800 D Source: City of National City, SANDAG, Fehr & Peers; September 2010 Note: Highlighted rows indicate substandard LOS E or F. FEUR IRAkSPORrA 9MSuliANrs ��. Pvfit-Tl+jliol CI fp FEHR be PEERS NnI on AVe LEGEND Base Layers ( j City of National City Freeways Major Roads Local Roads ---�� Railroad Streams Level of Service (LOS) D F ill '' Iona i Clay n Boundary N NOT To $CA ADOPTED CIRCULATION ELEMENT ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 6-5 City of National City General Plan Update - Circulatk n January 2011 6.3.2 Proposed Circulation Element Figure 6-6 illustrates the City's proposed Circulation Element network and associated roadway functional classifications. In comparison to the currently adopted Circulation Element roadway network, the proposed network includes: • Street c onversion at H oover A venue. be tween 22"d Street an d Mile of C ars Way t o pr ohibit vehicular traffic; • Street conversion at West Avenue, between 16th Street and 18th Street to prohibit vehicular traffic; • Downgrade of Highland Avenue, between Division Street and 8th Street from a 4-lane Arterial to a 2-lane with two-way left -turn lane Collector; • Downgrade of 8th Street, bet ween H ighland A venue and Paradise V alley Road from a 4 -lane Arterial to a 3-lane with two-way left -turn lane Arterial; and • Downgrade of 16th Street, between National City Boulevard and Highland Avenue from a 4-lane Collector to a 2-lane with two-way left -turn lane Collector. Level of Service was calculated for the key roadway segments to evaluate the future year 2030 traffic conditions under the Proposed Circulation Element. Table 6.3 shows the results of roadway Level of Service analysis, while Figure 6-7 displays the results in a mapped format. As shown, the following roadway segments (34 i n t otal) ar e pr ojected t o operate at LOS E o r F under future y ear 2030 conditions with the Proposed Circulation Element: • Wilson Avenue, between Civic Center Drive and 18°h Street (LOS F), • Wilson Avenue, between 18th Street and 22nd Street (LOS F), • Wilson Avenue, between 22nd Street and Mile of Cars Way (LOS F), • Hoover Avenue, between 8th Street and 181h Street (LOS F), • Roosevelt Avenue, between Division Street and 4th Street (LOS F), • Roosevelt Avenue, between 4th Street and 8'h Street (LOS F), • Roosevelt Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard (LOS F), • D Avenue. between Plaza Boulevard and 16th Street (LOS E), • Palm Avenue, between Division Street and 4th Street (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between 41h Street and 8th Street (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard (LOS F), • Palm Avenue, between Plaza Boulevard and 16th Street (LOS F), • Division Street, between D Avenue and Highland Avenue (LOS F), • 4th Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue (LOS E), • 4`h Street, between Palm Avenue and Euclid Avenue (LOS E), FEHR PEERS IRAKSPOKi.1110N COMSUn ANrS;.! City of National City General Platt ty to January 2011 • 4'h Street, between Euclid Avenue and Harbison Avenue (LOS F), • 8'h Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue (LOS F), • Plaza Boulevard, between Coolidge Avenue and Hoover Avenue (LOS F), • Civic Center Drive, between Harbor Drive and Wilson Avenue (LOS E), • Civic Center Drive, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard (LOS E), • 16`h Street, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard (LOS E), • 16"' Street, between L Avenue and Palm Avenue (LOS F), • 16`h Street, between Palm Avenue and Euclid Avenue (LOS F), • 16`h Street, between Euclid Avenue and Harbison Avenue (LOS F). • 18`h Street, between Wilson Avenue and National City Boulevard (LOS F), • 18`h Street, between National City Boulevard and D Avenue (LOS F), • 18`h Street, between D Avenue and Highland Avenue (LOS E), • 18`h Street, between Highland Avenue and L Avenue (LOS E), • 18`h Street, between L Avenue and Palm Avenue (LOS F), • 18`h Street, between Palm Avenue and Newell Street (LOS E), • 18`h Street, between Newell Street and Euclid Avenue (LOS F), • 18`h Street, between Euclid Avenue and Rachael Avenue (LOS F), • 22nd Street, between Wilson Avenue and Hoover Avenue (LOS E), and • 22"`' Street, between Hoover Avenue and National City Boulevard (LOS F). FEHR & PEE TRA KSPQRTAJtQN Ctl$SU[7A 0 N A 0 0 li 1 FEHR St PEERS nai Ave 1., National City Southern Boundary LEGEND Base Layers l,_,] City of National City Freeways ---- Major Roads Local Roads Railroad • Streams Roadway Classifications Arterial Collector Street Closure N NO TO SCALE PROPOSED ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS FIGURE 6-6 City of National City General Plan Upda January 2011 TABLE 6.3: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) PROPOSED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes ADT Capacity ADT LOS Harbor Drive Division Street 8`h Street Arterial 4 40,000 28,400 C Harbor Drive 8th Street Civic Center Drive Arterial 4 40,000 21,300 C Tidelands Avenue Civic Center Drive 19'h Street Collector 2 10,000 6,500 C Tidelands Avenue Tidelands Avenue 19'h Street Bay Marina Drive Bay Marina Drive 32"d Street Collector Collector Marina Way Bay Marina Drive 32nd Street Collector 2 2 2+1 10,000 10,000 15,000 5,000 B 2,800 A 12,200 D Cleveland Avenue Civic Center Drive 19th Street Collector 2+1 15,000 6,800 B Cleveland Avenue Hoover Avenue 19'h Street 22"d Street Bay Marina Drive Mile of Cars Way Collector 2+1 Stree 15,000 t Closure 7,300 C Hoover Avenue Miles of Cars Way 30`h Street Collector 4 20,000 14,400 Hoover Avenue Roosevelt Avenue Roosevelt Avenue West Avenue 30'h Street Plaza Boulevard Civic Center Drive 16thStreet 33rd Street Civic Center Drive 16`h Street 18`h Street Collector Collector 2 4,300 B 10,000 8,600 D 2 10,000 3,500 A Street Closure National City Boulevard Division Street 4th Street Arterial 4 40,000 19,500 B National City Boulevard 4m Street 8ih Street Arterial 4 40,000 20,200 B National City Boulevard National City Boulevard 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Arterial 4 40,000 22,600 C Plaza Boulevard Civic Center Drive Arterial 4 40,000 23,600 C National City Boulevard Civic Center Drive 16`h Street Arterial 4 40,000 24,300 C National City Boulevard 16'h Street National City Boulevard 18'h Street 18`h Street 22nd Street Arterial 4 40,000 15,700 B Arterial 4 40,000 19.000 B National City Boulevard 22"d Street 24`h Street Arterial 4 40,000 21.100 C F£((R sanxsroarArins PLE[is O MS uirnM lS City of National City General Ran,' January 2011 TABLE 6.3: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) PROPOSED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street National City Boulevard National City Boulevard D Avenue D Avenue D Avenue D Avenue D Avenue D Avenue D Avenue D Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue Highland Avenue L Avenue L Avenue L Avenue L Avenue Palm Avenue Palm Avenue Newell Street Grove Street Euclid Avenue Euclid Avenue Euclid Avenue From 24th Street 30th Street Division Street 4th Street 8th Street Plaza Boulevard 16th Street 18th Street 22ntl Street 24th Street Delta Street Division Street 4th Street 8th Street Plaza Boulevard 16th Street 18th Street 24th Street 30th Street 8th Street 16th Street 18th Street 24th Street 1-805 16th Street 18th Street Prospect Street Cervantes Avenue FEHR PEERS [R A$ SPOR rAt in £ ONSUUANTS Division Street 4th Street To Classification 30th Street Lanes ADT Capacity ADT LOS Arterial 4 40,000 24,000 35th Street Arterial 4 40,000 24,500 4th Street Collector 2 10,000 5,100 B 8th Street Collector 2 10,000 8,400 D Plaza Boulevard Collector 2 C 16th Street Collector 18th Street Collector 22nd Street Collector 24th Street 30th Street Division Street 4th Street 8th Street Plaza Boulevard 16th Street 18th Street 24th Street 30th Street SR-54 Plaza Boulevard 18th Street 24`h Street 30th Street Division Street 18th Street Prospect Street Sweetwater Road Division Street 4th Street 8th Street Collector Collector Arterial Collector Collector Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Collector Collector Collector Collector Arterial Collector Collector Collector Arterial Arterial Arterial 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 15,000 15,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 40,000 30,000 30,000 40,000 6,200 9,100 8,400 6,500 8,000 7,600 16,400 11,800 12,400 17,700 17,700 22,600 19,900 23,000 33,200 4,100 6,100 3,400 22,700 8,100 7,900 11,800 10,000 16,300 City of National City Genera! l la'ti UJpdate,r- January 2011 Street TABLE 6.3: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) PROPOSED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS From To Euclid Avenue 8`h Street Euclid Avenue Euclid Avenue Euclid Avenue Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Harbison Avenue Harbison Avenue Harbison Avenue Classification Lanes ADT Capacity ADT LOS Plaza Boulevard Arterial 4 30,000 16,300 Plaza Boulevard 16"' Street Arterial 4 30,000 17,900 C 16th Street 18th Street Arterial 4 30,000 8,800 A 181h Street 24` Street Arterial 4 30,000 10,200 B 24'h Street Sweetwater Road Arterial 4 30,000 13,400 B Division Street 4'h Street Collector 2 10,000 4.200 B 4`h Street 8th Street Collector 2 10,000 3,600 A 8th Street Plaza Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 10,600 C Plaza Boulevard 16th Street Collector 2 10,000 6.100 C Plaza Bonita Road Sweetwater Road Bonita Mesa Road Arterial Plaza Bonita Center Way Division Street Division Street Division Street National City Boulevard Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Sweetwater Road Arterial 40,000 18,700 40,000 26,800 D Avenue Collector 2+1 15,000 11,400 Palm Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 9,800 Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 16,400 B Division Street Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 15,000 C 4ti Street National City • DAvertue` _ - Collector- : 2 10,000 9,800 E Boulevard 4`h Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 2 10,000 8.600 4th Street Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Collector 2 10,000 7,900 D 4" Street PaI m°Avenue Euclid Arienue Collector 2 10,000.. _ g:200 8`h Street Harbor Drive 1-5 8`h Street 1-5 8th Street 8`h Street 8`h Street 8`h Street 8th Street National City Boulevard Arterial 4 30,000 14,900 Arterial 4 40,000 30,400 D Avenue Highland Avenue Collector 2+1 15,000 7,800 Highland Avenue Palm Avenue Palm Avenue Euclid Avenue Harbison Avenue Plaza Boulevard Hoover Avenue FEIIR & PEERS TRAKSPORIATIOI CBSULTANIS Arterial 3+1 25,000 16,500 C Euclid Avenue Arterial 3+1 25,000 19,800 D Harbison Avenue Arterial 3+1 25,000 17,300 Paradise Valley Road National City Boulevard Arterial 3+1 2 5, 000 12,800 Collector 4 20,000 12,700 City of National City General Plan Update — Circ January 2011 TABLE 6.3: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) PROPOSED GP — YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard Paradise Valley Road Civic Center Drive Civic Center Drive 16th Street 161h Street 18th Street 18th Street 18th Street 19th Street From National City Boulevard D Avenue Highland Avenue Palm Avenue 1-805 Euclid Avenue School Xing Harbison Avenue 8th Street To D Avenue Highland Avenue Palm Avenue 1-805 Euclid Avenue School Xing Harbison Avenue Harbor Drive Wilson Avenue Wilson Avenue National City Boulevard D Avenue Highland Avenue Tidelands Avenue Paradise Valley Road Plaza Entrada Wilson Avenue National City Boulevard National City Boulevard L Avenue Highland Avenue L Avenue Wilson Avenue Classification Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Arterial Collector Collector Collector Collector Lanes 4 6 6 4 4 4 ADT Capacity 30,000 30,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 4 Collector, Collector 4 40,000 40,000 15,000 15,000 10,000 10,000 20,000 ADT 19,900 17,600 19,200 31,400 37,800 28,800 27,500 10,700 10,000 8.400 '9,600 LOS C C A C C C D C 9,900 9,500 9,900 D C D B FENR & TRANSPORTATION PEERS ONSU»TAN1S City of National City General Pla January 2011 TABLE 6.3: ROADWAY AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC (ADT) AND LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) PROPOSED GP - YEAR 2030 CONDITIONS Street From To Classification Lanes Capacity ADT LOS Bay Marina Drive Tidelands Avenue Marina Way Collector 4 20,000 6,700 A Bay Marina Drive Marina Way Cleveland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 16,600 C Bay Marina Drive Cleveland Avenue 1-5 Arterial 4 30,000 17,900 C Mile of Cars Way 1-5 Wilson Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 32,400 D Mile of Cars Way Wilson Avenue Hoover Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 22,800 C Mile of Cars Way Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Arterial 4 40,000 17,000 B 24th Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 17,300 C 24th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 10,300 B 24th Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Collector 2 10,000 5,600 C 30th Street Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 4 20,000 4,600 A 30th Street National City Boulevard D Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 8,900 A 30th Street D Avenue Highland Avenue Arterial 4 30,000 18,500 C 30th Street Highland Avenue L Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 21,100 C 30`h Street L Avenue 2''Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 20,800 B Sweetwater Road 2nd Avenue Grove Street Arterial 4 40,000 27,100 C Sweetwater Road Grove Street I-805/Euclid Avenue Arterial 4 40,000 27,100 C Sweetwater Road I-805/Euclid Avenue Valley Road Arterial 4 40,000 31,900 D Sweetwater Road Valley Road Plaza Bonita Road Arterial 6 50,000 26,600 B Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Road Calmoor Street Arterial 4 40,000 24,000 C Sweetwater Road Calmoor Street Plaza Bonita Center Way Arterial 4 30,000 19,200 C B 33rd Street Hoover Avenue National City Boulevard Collector 2 10.000 4,300 Valley Road Sweetwater Road Calle Abajo Collector 2 10,000 7,400 C Source: City of National City, SANDAG, Fehr & Peers; September 2010 Note: Highlighted rows indicate substandard LOS E or F. fits-IR PEEPS SAANSFORrAfl a CONSULTANTS fp FFHR & [FFRS I!'1 1f; nal City rnBoundary LEGEND Base Layers City of National City Freeways Major Roads Local Roads Railroad Streams Level of Service (LOS) A -C D E F m Q� gym° Street Closure NOT TC SCALE PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE FIGURE 6-7 City of National City Gene January 2011 6.3.3 Deficiency/Improvement Identification Table 6.4 lists all 3 4 deficient r oadway s egments i n t he C ity of N ational C ity under the pr oposed Circulation Element. This table also includes forecast ADT, LOS, roadway classification, and mitigated classification. The r oadway c lassification r epresents t he C irculation E lement U pdate identified classification and the mitigated roadway classification represents the classification that would be required to mitigate the identified deficiency. TABLE 6.4: DEFICIENT FACILITIES AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT Roadway Segment Limits Classification ADT LOS Mitigated Classification Wilson Avenue Between Civic Center Dr and 18'h St (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 19,400 F Arterial, 4-Ln Wilson Avenue Between 18`h St and 22od St (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 18,600 F Arterial, 4-Ln Wilson Avenue Between 22od St and Mile of Cars Wy Collector, 2-Ln 12,500 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Hoover Avenue Between 8th St and 18`h St Collector, 2-Ln 10,500 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Roosevelt Avenue Between Division St and 4'h St Collector, 2-Ln 10,700 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Roosevelt Avenue Between 4`h St and 8'h St Collector, 2-Ln 10.700 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Roosevelt Avenue Between 8thSt and Plaza Blvd (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 10.500 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane D Avenue Between Plaza Blvd and 16`h St (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 9,100 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Palm Avenue Between Division St and 4 1 1h Collector, 2-Ln 15,800 F Collector, 4-Ln Palm Avenue Between 4th St and 8thSt (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 12,000 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Palm Avenue Between 8th St and Plaza Blvd (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 11,000 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane FEHR tcz. PEE IRANSPOP.IATI O' CONSI3HAN2 City of National City General Plan Update— Circe January 2011 TABLE 6.4: DEFICIENT FACILITIES AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT Palm Avenue Between Plaza Blvd and 16th St (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 11,800 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Division Street Between D Ave and Highland Ave Collector, 2-Ln 10,700 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 4th Street Between National City Blvd and D Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 9,800 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 4th Street Between Palm Ave and Euclid Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 9,200 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 4`h Street Between Euclid Ave and Harbison Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 11,100 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 8'h Street Between National City Blvd and D Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2+1-Ln 17,600 F Arterial, 4-Ln Plaza Boulevard Between Coolidge Ave and Hoover Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 10,300 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Civic Center Drive Between Harbor Dr and Wilson Ave Collector, 2-Ln 9,300 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane Civic Center Drive Between Wilson Ave and National City Blvd (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 9,500 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 16`h Street Between Wilson Ave and National City Blvd Collector, 2-Ln 9,600 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 16th Street Between L Ave and Palm Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 11,800 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 16th Street Between Palm Ave and Euclid Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 11,000 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 16th Street Between Euclid Ave and Harbison Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 12,100 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane FEH-HR ?RARSRORTAT CONSU City of National City Genera{ Plan Update-=�C`ftcuf January 2011 TABLE 6.4: DEFICIENT FACILITIES AND RECOMMENDED MITIGATION MEASURES PROPOSED CIRCULATION ELEMENT 18th Street Between Wilson Ave and National City Blvd (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 15,100 F Collector, 4-Ln 18th Street Between National City Blvd and D Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 10,100 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 18`h Street Between D Ave and Highland Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 9,600 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane m 18 Street Between Highland Ave and L Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 9,900 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 18th Street Between L Ave and Palm Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 13,200 F Collector, 4-Ln 18' Street Between Palm Ave and Newell St (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 9,500 E Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 181h Street Between Newell St and Euclid Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 10,800 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane m 18 Street Between Euclid Ave and Rachael Ave Collector, 2-Ln 12,600 F Collector, 2-Ln with two-way left -turn lane 22otl Street Between Wilson Ave and Hoover Ave (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 15,700 F Collector, 4-Ln 22nd Street Between Hoover Ave and National City Blvd (Community Corridor) Collector, 2-Ln 15.700 F Collector, 4-Ln Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2011 To widen these roadways further, sidewalks would need to be removed or reduced in width, which would result i n i mpacts t o non -vehicular m odes of t ransit (pedestrians an d b icyclists). R ecent r evisions i n planning and environmental law recognize the importance of planning for multiple modes of transportation, which pr ovide for t he nee ds of al I us ers (including p edestrians, bi cyclists. m ass t ransit riders, and motorists. (See AB 1 358 [2008]; SB 375 [2008].) As such, these mitigation measures are also c onsidered i nfeasible due t o pol icy c onsiderations. A nother opt ion f or r oadway widening would involve t he expansion of c urrent R ight-Of-Way t hrough a dditional pr operty ac quisition. P roperty acquisitions, however, are considered environmentally, financially, and socially infeasible. Property acquisition would require demolition of existing buildings which would generate additional environmental impacts associated with air quality, noise, GHGs.. as well as continuing to promote vehicular use. F[I-1J IRAKSr ORTMI PEERS onsor*Ants Furthermore, w idening of t hese r oadway s egments w ould also c reate a less pedes trian or iented environment and w ould t hus create ad ditional i mpacts t o t his a Iternative m ode of t ransportation. F or these reasons, mitigation measures at these roadway segments are considered infeasible. T herefore, because no feasible mitigation exists, the impact at these 34 roadway segments remains significant and unavoidable. 6.3.4 Potential Impacts to Adjacent Jurisdictions The purpose of this section is to document potential significant traffic impacts on regional arterials located in adjacent jurisdictions, as a result of the City of National City's proposed Circulation Element. Study roadway segments from adjacent jurisdictions were selected based upon location and connectivity to the roadway network within the City of National City, as shown below: City of San Diego • Harbor Drive, from Wabash Blvd to Division St • Main Street, from Wabash Blvd to Division St • 43`d Street, from Logan Ave to Division St • 47th Street, from Logan Ave to 1-805 • Euclid Avenue, from Logan Ave to Cervantes Ave • Paradise Valley Road, from Munda Rd to Woodman St City of Chula Vista • Broadway, from SR-54 to E St • 4th Avenue, from SR-54 to E St • Plaza Bonita Road, from Bonita Mesa Rd to Bonita Rd Unincorporated County of San Diego • Sweetwater Road. from Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St Traffic v olumes and r esulting Levels of S ervice ( LOS) on t he s tudied k ey r oadway s egments w ere analyzed and compared under each of the following three (3) conditions: • Existing C onditions — This s tudy c ondition i ncludes ex fisting t raffic v olumes on t he r espective roadway segments in the various jurisdictions as currently constructed. • City of N ational C ity A dopted G eneral P Ian — This c ondition includes I and us es and r oadway network consistent with the buildout of the currently adopted City of National City General Plan. • City of N ational C ity Proposed General P Ian — This c ondition i ncludes I and uses and r oadway network consistent with buildout of the proposed City of National City General Plan. City of National City General Plan Update January 2011 {Ijlhl(il Approach and Methodology Detailed i nformation o n t he r oadway s egment anal ysis methodologies. s tandards, a nd t hresholds ar e discussed in the following section. Roadway Segment Level of Service Standards and Thresholds Roadway s egment LO S s tandards and t hresholds pr ovide t he bas is f or anal ysis of ar terial r oadway segment performance. The analysis of roadway segment LOS was based on the functional classification of t he r oadway, t he m aximum capacity, r oadway g eometrics, and ex isting or forecast A verage D aily Traffic (ADT) volumes. Methodologies for as certaining roadway LO S vary a mongst t he j urisdictions. Tables 6.5, 6.6 and 6.7 display t he r oadway s egment LO S s tandards a nd t hresholds f or t he C ity of San Diego, C ity of C hula Vista, and County of San Diego. respectively. TABLE 6.5: CITY OF SAN DIEGO CIRCULATION ELEMENT ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Roadway Functional Classification Level of Service (in ADT) A B C D E Expressway (6-lane) < 30,000 < 42,000 < 60,000 < 70,000 < 80,000 Prime Arterial (6-lane) < 25,000 < 35,000 < 50,000 < 55,000 < 60,000 Major Arterial (6-lane, divided) < 20,000 < 28,000 < 40,000 < 45,000 < 50,000 Major Arterial (4-lane, divided) < 15,000 < 21,000 < 30,000 < 35,000 < 40,000 Secondary Arterial / Collector (4- lane w/ center lane) < 10,000 < 14.000 < 20,000 < 25,000 < 30,000 Collector (4-lane w/o center lane) < 5,000 < 7,000 < 10,000 < 13,000 < 15,000 Collector (2-lane w/ continuous left- turn lane) Collector (2-lane no fronting property) < 4,000 < 5,500 < 7,500 < 9,000 < 10,00D Collector (2-lane w/ commercial fronting) < 2,500 < 3,500 < 5,000 < 6,500 < 8,000 Collector (2-lane multi -family) Sub -Collector (2-lane single-family) - - < 2.200 - - SourceSANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) Note: Bold numbers indicate the ADT thresholds for acceptable LOS. FEHR 4NANSPOP. TA PEERS ONSuLIANTS City of National City General Blatt U January 2011 TABLE 6.6: CITY OF CHULA VISTA CIRCULATION ELEMENT ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS Roadway Functional Classification Level of Service (in ADT) - - - A B C D E Non -Urban Core Expressway (7 or 8-lane) < 52,500 < 61,300 < 70,000 < 78,800 < 87,500 Prime Arterial (6-lane) < 37,500 < 43,800 < 50,000 < 56,300 < 62,500 Major Street (6-lane) < 30,000 < 35,000 < 40,000 < 45,000 < 50,000 Major Street (4-lane) < 22,500 < 26,300 < 30,000 < 33,800 < 37.500 Town Center Arterial Class I Collector (4-lane) < 37,500 < 16,500 < 43,800 < 19,300 < 50,000 < 22,000 < 56,300 < 62,50D < 24,800 < 27,500 Class 11 Collector (3-lane) < 9,000 < 10,500 < 12,000 < 13,500 < 15,000 Class III Collector (2-lane) < 5,600 < 6,600 < 7,500 < 8,400 < 9,400 Urban Core' Gateway Street (6-lane) - - - < 61,200 - Gateway Street (4-lane) - - - < 43,200 - Urban Arterial (4-lane) - - - < 37,800 - Commercial Boulevard (4-lane) - - - < 33,750 - Downtown Promenade (2/4-lane) - - - < 14,400 - Source: City of Chula Vista Note: Bold numbers indicate the ADT thresholds for acceptable LOS. TABLE 6.7: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO PROPOSED ROADWAY SEGMENT DAILY CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS No. Travel Lanes Design Speed Road Classification Level of Service ('n ADT) A B C D E 6.1 6 65 mph Expressway 36,000 54,000 70,000 86,000 108,000 6.2 6 65 mph Prime Arterial 22,200 37.000 24.700 44,600 50,000 57,000 4.1A 4 55 mph Major Road with Raised Median 14,800 29,600 33,400 37,000 4.1B Major Road with Intermittent Turn Lanes 13,700 22.800 27,400 30,800 34,200 4.2A 4 40 mph Boulevard with Raised Median 5,700 12,500 19,000 27,000 32,500 4 2B Boulevard with Intermittent Turn Lane 5,000 10.900 17,200 25,000 30,000 F E t'-1 1?, &. P E E-RS 1 RANSPOR TATION CO$ U.TA/13S City of National City Genera f Alan Update--" Cf i January 2011 _n a TABLE 6.7: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO PROPOSED ROADWAY SEGMENT DAILY CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE STANDARDS No. Travel Lanes Design Speed Road Classification Level of Service ('n ADT) A B C D E 2.1A 2 45 mph Community Collector with Raised Median 2,800 6,500 10,300 15,000 20.500 2.1B Community Collector w/ Continuous Turn Lane 3,000 6,000 9,500 13,500 19,000 2.1C Community Collector w/ Intermittent Turn Lane 3,000 6,000 9,500 13,500 19,000 21D Community Collector with Improvement Options 3,000 6,000 9,500 13,500- 15,000 19.000 2.1E Community Collector 1,900 4,100 7,100 10,900 16,200 2 2A 2 40 mph Light Collector with Raised Median 3,000 6,000 9,500 13,500 19,000 2 2B Light Collector with Continuous Turn Lane 3,000 6,000 9,500 13,500 19,000 2 2C Light Collector with Intermittent Turn Lanes 3,000 6,000 9,500 13,500 19,000 2 2D Light Collector with Improvement Options 3,000 6,000 9,500 13,500 19,000 2.2E Light Collector 1,900 4,100 7,100 10,900 16,200 2.2F Light Collector with Reduced Shoulder 1,550 3,300 5,600 8,700 16,200 2.3A 2 3B 2 35 mph Minor Collector with Raised Median 1,400 3,000 5,100 8,000 12.900 Minor Collector with Intermittent Turn Lane 1,400 3,000 5,100 8,000 12.900 2.3C Minor Collector 1,350 2,700 4.500 7,000 11.300 Source: County of San Diego Notes. • The LOS thresholds for Mobility Element road classifications reflect those in place when EIR traffic modeling was conducted. Some LO S thresholds are subject to change with the revision to the County Public R oad Standards ( The S tandards). However, the 2009 revisions to The Standards will not change the LOS D operation threshold of any road classification. The standard of LO S D f or M obitity E lement r oads and t he LO S D oper ation thresholds w ere ad opted by t he B oard o f Supervisors. • Bold numbers indicate the ADT thresholds for acceptable LOS. Impact Significance Criteria The Thresholds for det ermination of s ignificant pr oject-related i mpacts t o r oadways i n t he C ity of San Diego, City of Chula Vista, and County of San Diego are outlined below: FC:tIR & PEER rRAMSPOATAT ON CONSUITAN1 City of Na tional City General l•tan Updat -. January 2011 • City of San Diego The C ity of San D iego c onsiders LOS D t o be the maximum acceptable LOS f or roadways, ex cept in undeveloped I ocations where LO S C is c onsidered to b e ac ceptable. In general, a significant i mpact would be identified when the addition of project traffic results in a Level of Service dropping from LOS D or bet ter t o s ubstandard LOS E or F . Table 6.8 summarizes t he i mpact s ignificance t hresholds f or facilities operating at substandard LOS with and without the project. As shown, the thresholds as applied to roadway segments are based upon an acceptable increase in the Volume / Capacity (V/C) ratio. TABLE 6.8: CITY OF SAN DIEGO MEASURES OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS LO5 with Project Allowable Change Due to Impact Freeways Roadway Segments Intersections Ramp Metering V/C Speed (mph) V/C Speed (mph) Delay (sec) Delay (min.) E 0.01 1 0.02 1 2 2 F 0.005 0.5 0.01 0.5 1 1 Source: City of San Diego City of Chula Vista The City of Chula Vista considers LOS C in non -Urban Core areas and LOS D in Urban Core areas to be the ac ceptable s tandards for C irculation E lement r oadway s egments. S ignificant i mpacts ar e t hose impacts for which the addition of project trips results in an identifiable degradation i n LOS on r oadway segments triggering the need for improvement strategies. Criteria f or det ermining whether a pr oject r esults i n s ignificant impacts on non -Urban C ore r oadway segments are as follows: 1. LOS is LOS D, LOS E, or LOS F. 2. Project trips comprise 5% or more of total segment volume. 3. Project adds greater than 800 ADT to the segment. Criteria for determining whether a project results in significant impacts on Urban Core roadway segments are as follows: 1. LOS is LOS E or LOS F. 2. Project trips comprise 5% or more of total segment volume. County of San Diego Traffic v olume i ncreases f rom publ is or pr ivate de pendent pr ojects t hat r esult i n on e or m ore o f t he following criteria will have a significant traffic impact on a road segment, unless specific facts show that there are other circumstances that mitigate or avoid such impacts: • The additional or redistributed ADT generated by the proposed project will significantly increase congestion on a Circulation Element Road or State Highway currently operating at LOS E or LOS F as identified in Table 6.9, or will cause a Circulation Element Road or State Highway to operate at LOS E or LOS F as a result of the proposed project, or IEHR- & 'EI RS SkAA5POR i/7ION [p NStlEiAfl rS City of National City General Plan Update January 2011 • The addi tional or redistributed ADT generated b y t he proposed project will cause a r esidential street to exceed its design capacity. TABLE 6.9: MEASURES OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECT IMPACTS TO CONGESTION ON ROAD SEGMENTS: ALLOWABLE INCREASES ON CONGESTED ROAD SEGMENTS Level of Service Two -Lane Road Four -Lane Road Six -Lane Road LOS E 200 ADT 400 ADT 600 ADT LOS F 100 ADT 200 ADT 300 ADT Source: County of San Diego Notes • By adding proposed project trips to all other trips from a I ist of projects, this same table must be used to determine if total cumulative impacts are significant. If cumulative impacts are found to be significant, each project that contributes any trips must mitigate a share of the cumulative impacts. • The County may also determine impacts have occurred on roads even when a project's traffic or cumulative impacts do not trigger an unacceptable Level of Service, when such traffic uses a significant amount of remaining road capacity. Existing Conditions This section describes the key roadway segments analyzed in the adjacent jurisdictions and provides an assessment of r oadway p erformance i n t erms of oper ating LO S un der E xisting C onditions. A nalysis results are summarized by jurisdiction. Roadway Network and Volumes The existing roadway cross -sections are consistent with current roadway lane configurations. The average d aily t raffic (ADTs) v olumes w ere d erived f rom t he S ANDAG S eries 1 1 S outhbay Base Year 2003 traffic model, specially built for the City of National City General Plan Update. Roadway Performance Table 6.10 displays existing roadway c ross-sections, daily roadway capacity (LOS E) based upon the respective jurisdictional standard, the existing average daily traffic volume (ADT), and the corresponding LOS for the identified key roadway segments by jurisdiction. As shown in table, only the segment of Sweetwater Road, from Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St (County of San Diego) is currently operating at LOS E. F1 R PEERS r RAx SFOP.'FAl• 1OM CO RSULTANtS City of National City General Plan Up January 2011 TABLE 6.10: ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE BY JURISDICTION EXISTING CONDITIONS Roadway Segment Cross -Section Capacity (LOS E) ADT LOS San Diego' ' Harbor Drive Wabash Blvd to Division St 4-Ln 40,000 26,300 C Main Street Wabash Blvd to Division St 4-Ln 40,000 14,300 A 43`d Street Logan Ave to Division St 4-Ln 40,000 16,700 B 47th Street Logan Ave to 1-805 3-Ln 15,000 11,300 D Euclid Avenue Logan Ave to Cervantes Ave 4-Ln 30,000 15,000 C Paradise Valley Road Munda Rd to Woodman St 4-Ln 40,000 20,000 B Chula Vista Broadway SR-54 to E St 4-Ln Urban Core 33,750 18.200 D or better 4th Avenue SR-54 to E St 4-Ln Urban Core 37,800 19,400 D or better Plaza Bonita Road Bonita Mesa Rd to Bonita Rd 4-Ln 37,500 11,100 A County of San Diego Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St 2-Ln 19,000 15.600 E Source: Fehr & Peers, September 2010 Note: Bold letters indicate substandard LOS. Adopted City of National City General Plan The adopted National City General Plan represents the no -project condition, and includes land uses and roadway network characteristics consistent with the currently adopted National City Circulation Element. Roadway Network and Volumes The future year roadway classifications within the adjacent jurisdictions were derived from the circulation elements of the respective jurisdictions. The average daily traffic volumes were derived from the SANDAG Series 1 1 S outhbay T ransportation Mo del, " Adopted N ational C ity General P Ian" t raffic forecast. Roadway Performance Table 6.11 displays the future year roadway classifications within the adjacent jurisdictions, the roadway capacity (LOS E) based upon the respective jurisdictional standard, the 2030 forecast average daily traffic volume, and the corresponding LOS assuming buildout of the Adopted National City General Plan. As s hown in table, t he following two (2) study segments are projected t o o perate at s ubstandard LOS under future year buildout of the National City's currently adopted General Plan: • Broadway, from SR-54 to E Street (Chula Vista Urban Core area); and • Sweetwater Road. from Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow Street (County of SD). PITH. & PEERS TRANS FORrALEON iONSOlIANIS City of National City General Plan Upda January 2011 TABLE 6.11: 2030 FORECAST ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE BY JURISDICTION CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN Roadway Segment Classification Capacity (LOS Ej ADT LOS San Diego Harbor Drive Wabash Blvd to Division St 4-Ln Major 40,000 28,600 C Main Street Wabash Blvd to Division St 4-Ln Major 40,000 21,400 C 43rd Street Logan Ave to Division St 4-Ln Major 40,000 20,800 B 47h Street Logan Ave to 1-805 4-Ln Collector 30,000 20,100 D Euclid Avenue Logan Ave to Cervantes Ave 4-Ln Collector 30,000 19,500 C Paradise Valley Road Munda Rd to Woodman St 4-Ln Major 40,000 22,000 C Chula Vista Broadway SR-54 to E St Commercial Blvd 33,750 43,200 F 4th Avenue SR-54 to E St Urban Arterial 37,800 25,600 D or better Plaza Bonita Road Bonita Mesa Rd to Bonita Rd 4-Ln Major 37,500 11,700 A County of San Diego Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St 2.1 D Community Collector 19,000 21,500 F Source: Fehr & Peers, September 2010 Note Bold letters indicate substandard LOS. Proposed City of National City General Plan This condition includes land uses and roadway network consistent with the proposed City of National City General Plan. Roadway Network and Volumes The future year roadway classifications within the adjacent jurisdictions were derived from the circulation elements of the respective jurisdictions. The average daily traffic volumes were derived from the SANDAG Series 11 Southbay Transportation Model, "Proposed National City General Plan" traffic forecast. Roadway Performance Table 6.12 displays the assumed future year roadway classification, the roadway capacity (LOS E) based upon the jurisdictional standard, the 2030 average daily traffic volume, and the corresponding LOS for the analyzed roadway segments in the adjacent jurisdictions, assuming buildout of the proposed National City General Plan. As shown in table, the following two (2) study segments are projected to operate at substandard LOS under future year buildout of the National City's proposed General Plan: • Broadway, from SR-54 to E Street (Chula Vista Urban Core area); and • Sweetwater Road, from Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow Street (County of SD). City of National Ci January 2011' TABLE 6.12: 2030 FORECAST ROADWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE BY JURISDICTION CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE Roadway Segment Classification Capacity (LOS E) ADT LOS San Diego Harbor Drive Wabash Blvd to Division St 4-Ln Major 40,000 30,700 C Main Street Wabash Blvd to Division St 4-Ln Major 40,000 22,900 C 43rd Street Logan Ave to Division St 4-Ln Major 40,000 19,200 B 471h Street Logan Ave to 1-805 4-Ln Collector 30,000 20,400 D Euclid Avenue Logan Ave to Cervantes Ave 4-Ln Collector 30.000 19,400 C Paradise Valley Road Munda Rd to Woodman St 4-Ln Major 40,000 21,600 C Chula Vista Broadway SR-54 to E St Commercial Blvd 33,750 43,400 F 4th Avenue SR-54 to E St Urban Arterial 37,800 25,800 D or better Plaza Bonita Road Bonita Mesa Rd to Bonita Rd 4-Ln Major 37,500 11,700 A County San Diego Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St 2.1 D Community Collector 19.000 21,300 F Source: Fehr & Peers, September 2010 Note: Bold letters indicate substandard LOS. Identification of Significant Impacts This section documents significant impacts on the key roadway segments within the adjacent jurisdictions that would r esult f rom bui !clout of t he proposed N ational C ity G eneral Plan Update. T he f allowing comparisons were made for purposes of determining significant traffic impacts: Proposed National City General Plan to Existing Conditions (Proposed Plan to Ground) — this comparison provides the basis for identifying significant impacts associated with future year buildout of the proposed General Plan when comparing to the current roadway operations. Proposed National City General Plan to Adopted National City General Plan (Proposed Plan to Adopted Plan) — this comparison provides the basis for identifying new significant impacts that would result with the proposed General Plan. Comparison of Proposed National City Genera/ Plan to Existing Conditions Table 6.13 compares t he r esulting r oadway p erformance on t he k ey r oadway s egments w ithin t he adjacent jurisdictions under the proposed City of National City General Plan to Existing conditions, and displays the changes in the roadway segments Volume/Capacity (V/C) ratio as the basis for identification of significant impacts. FENi. & PEERS !NAKSPORTAIPON CONSUttANTS City of Natio January 201 TABLE 6.13: SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS PROPOSED NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN VS. EXISTING CONDITIONS (PROPOSED PLAN TO GROUND) Roadway Segment Existing Proposed GP Update A in V/C Significant Impact? ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS - San Diego Harbor Drive Wabash Blvd to Division St 26,300 0.66 C 30.700 0.77 C 0.11 No Main Street Wabash Blvd to Division St 14,300 0.36 A 22,900 0.57 C 0.21 No 43rd Street Logan Ave to Division St 16,700 0.42 B 19,200 20,400 0.48 0.68 B 0.06 No 47th Street Logan Ave to 1-805 11,300 0.75 D D -0.07 No Euclid Avenue Logan Ave to Cervantes Ave 15,000 0.50 C 19,400 0.65 C 0.15 No Paradise Valley Road Munda Rd to Woodman St 20,000 0.50 B 21,600 0.54 C 0.04 No Chula Vista Broadway SR-54 to E St 18,200 0.54 better D or better 43,400 1.29 F 0.75 Yes 4Th Avenue SR-54 to E St 19,400 0-51 25,800 0.68 D or better 0.17 No Plaza Bonita Road Bonita Mesa Rd to Bonita Rd 11,100 0.30 A 11,700 0.31 A 0.01 No County o1` San Diego , Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St 15,600 0.82 E 21.300 1.12 F 0.30 Yes Source: Fehr & Peers, Septembe 2010 Notes: • Bold letters indicate substandard LOS. • A in VIC = The change in the volume to capacity ratio between the two scenarios. As shown, the following two (2) roadway segments in the adjacent jurisdictions (one in the City of Chula Vista and one in the County of San Diego) would be significantly impacted based upon a comparison of the proposed National City General Plan to Existing conditions: City of Chula Vista: Broadway, from SR-54 to E Street. County of San Diego: Sweetwater Road, from Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow Street. FEHR & PEERS tRA NSPORTArtO4 CONSULTANTS Comparison of Proposed National City General Plan to Adopted National City General Plan Table 6.14 compares projected roadway performance on the key roadway segments within the adjacent jurisdictions under the proposed National City General Plan to the roadway performance under the Adopted National City General Plan, and displays the change in Volume/Capacity (V/C) ratio as the basis for identification of significant impacts. TABLE 6.14: SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS PROPOSED NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN VS. ADOPTED NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN (PROPOSED PLAN TO ADOPTED PLAN) Roadway Segment Existing Proposed GP Update i! in VIC Significant Impact? ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS San Diego Harbor Drive Wabash Blvd to Division St 28,600 0.72 C 30,700 0.77 C 0.05 No Main Street Wabash Blvd to Division St 21,400 0.54 C 22,900 0.57 C 0.03 No 431u Street Logan Ave to Division St 20,800 0.52 B 19,200 0.48 B -0.04 No 47`r' Street Logan Ave to 1-805 20,100 0.67 D 20,400 0.68 D 0.01 No Euclid Avenue Logan Ave to Cervantes Ave 19,500 0.65 C 19,400 0.65 C 0 No Paradise Valley Road Munda Rd to Woodman St 22,000 0.55 C 21,600 0.54 C -0.01 No Chula Vista Broadway SR-54 to E St 43,200 1.28 F 43,400 1.29 F 0.01 No 4th Avenue SR-54 to E St 25,600 0.68 D or better 25,800 0.68 D or better 0 No Plaza Bonita Road Bonita Mesa Rd to Bonita Rd 11,700 0.31 A 11,700 0.31 A 0 No County of San Diego Sweetwater Road Plaza Bonita Center Way to Willow St 21,500 1.13 F 21,300 1.12 F -0.01 No Source Fehr & Peers, September 2010 Notes: • Bold letters indicate substandard LOS. • Lii in WC = The change in the volume to capacity ratio between the Iwo scenarios. FF;HIZ +St. PET;I..ti TR ANspORTAT:ON CONSULTANTS,. Ntil'liill.11141, As s hown, no ne of t he study roadway s egments within t he adjacent j urisdictions would b e s ignificantly impacted bas ed u pon t he c omparison of t he National C ity's pr oposed G eneral Plan t o t he c urrently Adopted General Plan. Mitigation of Significant Impacts Proposed Plan to Ground — Mitigation of the identified significant traffic impacts could include a variety of options from roadway segment widenings to specific intersection improvements. Requirements could vary by j urisdiction, including f urther r eview of i ntersection operations as a d etermination of o verall roadway segment performance. The feasibility of modifying the roadway classifications as shown in the circulation elements of the individual incorporated jurisdictions would be a consideration as well. Proposed Plan to Adopted Plan — No s ignificant i mpacts w ere identified, therefore n o m itigation measures would be required. 6.4 TRANSIT SERVICES AND FACILITIES Increasing the use of public transit is a primary goal for the City of National. Planned service improvements i nclude t he future Bus Rapid T ransit (BRT) line along 1-805, enhanced transit services along Plaza Boulevard linking the trolley station with the pl anned BRT I ine, a nd pot ential s huttle r outes servicing the local community. 6.4.1 Future South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) The S outh Bay B RT pr oject i s a S ANDAG i nitiated project with two phases of implementation. Phase 1 includes a 21-mile fast and high -frequency transit line b etween t he 0 tay Mesa bor der c rossing a nd downtown San Diego via eastern Chula Vista, 1-805, and SR-94; and Phase 2 includes the addition of the 1-805 managed lanes, a direct access ramp and transit station at Palomar Street, and two new on-line stations and p ark -and -rides at H Street a nd P laza Boulevard. T he B RT pr oject i s ex pected to be in service by early 2014. At full build out, service along this B RT I ine w ould be provided at 10-minute frequencies dur ing p eak c ommute ho urs, and e very 15 minutes during the mid -day. The P laza Boulevard S tation is I ocated in the C ity of N ational C ity. A long with u pgraded pas senger shelter, t his s tation will be des igned with technological e nhancements t hat will pr ovide r eal-time bus arrival information and ticket vending machines. The station will be located in the public right-of-way and designed to provide safe pedestrian access. 6.4.2 Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard, al ready a busy transit c orridor, w ill bec ome t he most i mportant t ransit c onnection between the 81h Street Trolley Station and the planned BRT station located at off of Plaza Boulevard in National City. Plaza Boulevard, between Highland Avenue and Euclid Avenue is planned to be widened to a 6-lane Arterial with projected average traffic volumes range from 19,200 and 37,800. Two levels of ltiTRJ nSLAAN15 City of National City General PlanUpdat January 2011 transit treatments are under consideration for this section of the roadway, includingl) mixed flow (current conditions) with t ransit s ignal pr iority; and 2) implementation of a t ransit-only I ane with t ransit s ignal priority. With transit only lane option, the most outer lane in each direction would be designated for transit and right -turn vehicles. Table 6-15 displays future year traffic operations along Plaza Boulevard with the two transit options. Figure 6-8 illustrates the proposed cross -sections for Plaza Boulevard with the mixed flow and transit only lane options. Intersection LO S an alyses w ere c onducted a long P Iaza B oulevard t o e valuate t he of fects on t raffic operations associated w ith both t he t ransit t reatment s cenarios i dentified above. D etailed LO S calculation worksheets are attached in Appendix C. TABLE 6.15: PLAZA BOULEVARD TRAFFIC OPERATIONS WITH TRANSIT OPTIONS Intersection 2030 with Mixed Flow Transit 2030 with Transit -Only Lane AM Peak PM Peak AM Peak PM Peak Plaza Blvd / Highland Ave 24.0 (C) 45.8 (D) 24.1 (C) 47.4 (D) Plaza Blvd / L Ave 11.6 (B) 17.2 (B) 11.6 (B) 18.4 (B) Plaza Blvd / N Ave 11.3 (B) 22.4 (C) 11.2 (B) 25.5 (C) Plaza Blvd / Palm Ave 27.8 (C) 32.0 (C) 28.6 (C) 36.0 (D) Plaza Blvd / I-805 SB Ramps 16.0 (B) 32.7 (C) 16.6 (B) 33.5 (C) Plaza Blvd / I-805 NB Ramps 10.5 (B) 18.4 (C) 11.1 (B) 18.6 (B) Plaza Blvd / Grove St 19.4 (B) 41.8 (D) 26.3 (C) 46.7 (D) Plaza Blvd / Euclid Ave 34.3 (C) 49.1 (D) 30.8 (C) 39.2 (D) Source: Fehr & Peers. September 2010 As shown in the table, all of the intersections along Plaza Boulevard would operate at acceptable LOS D or better during peak hours in the year 2030, both with "six travel lanes with mixed flow for transit" and "four travel lanes with transit only lanes" options. Along with transit signal priority treatment, the "transit only lanes" option would allow transit to operate in its own right-of-way, ensure on -time arrival and shorter travel t imes t hus i mproving t he o verall q uality of t ransit s ervice a long Plaza B oulevard. T hus, t he likelihood of increased ridership and a corresponding decrease in auto trip would be under this option. F NANSPOR I Al PI FRS NSUI_TANIS 11, Sidewaik Travel Lane MIXED FLOW OPTION Travel Lane Travel Lane Median er Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Sideuelk 13' 11' 80Curb to Curb 1 1' 11' 13 TRANSIT ONLY LANE OPTION Sidewalk Travel Lane Travel Lane Travel Lane Medi, Turn Lane revel Lane =6 Iravel Lane 117 -Snivel Lone &Ocean, 13' 11' 10' 11' 11' 80' Curb to Curb fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS PLAZA BOULEVARD PROPOSED CROSS -SECTIONS 22. 2010 1311 FIGURE 6-8 City of National City General Plan Update— Circulation January 2011 6.4.3 Potential Shuttle Routes This section presents an initial evaluation of three proposed shuttle routes in National City. The evaluation includes a summary of service objectives; description of the routes, service c haracteristics, and potential vehicle types; identification of conceptual operation and capital costs; and r ecommended next steps to further this planning process. Service Objectives The three routes would provide local mobility and regional access to National City residents, workers, and visitors. Frequent loop service within the Civic Center/downtown area would be a convenient alternative to driving, thus improving local mobility. The hub of each route would be at a MTS Blue Line Station, with Shuttle Route 1 also connecting to the planned South Bay BRT station at I-5/Plaza Boulevard. This type of shuttle service can help meet important multi -modal objectives: • Improving local access to regional transit facilities; • Providing a convenient and accessible local transportation for local residents; • Providing employees and residents of the City with a green lifestyle choice for transportation; Route Descriptions Three potential shuttle routes were provided for evaluation by National City Staff. Route 1 Route 1 would provide east -west service in National City and offer access to, and a connection between regionally s ignificant t ransit f acilities ( the 8th Street Trolley Station and the proposed South Bay Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) station at I-5/Plaza Boulevard). The route would travel primarily on 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. A route concept map is shown in Figure 6-9. This route would also provide access to Plaza Towne S hopping Center, S outh B ay P laza S hopping Center, an d retail destinations al ong 8th Street. Round trip distance is 5.0 miles. Route 2 Route 2 would provide a c onvenient connection between the C ivic C enter/downtown area a rid the 8th Street Trolley Station. In the Civic Center/downtown area, the route would travel on National City Boulevard, 8th Street, D Avenue, 16th Street in a clockwise direction. A route concept map is shown in Figure 6-10. This route would provide access to Kimball Park, National City Library, City Hall, and retail destinations along 8th Street. Round trip distance is 3.2 miles. Route 3 Route 3 would provide a connection between the Civic Center/downtown area and the 24th Street Trolley Station. The route w ould m irror R oute 2 i n t he C ivic C enter/downtown area. A r oute c oncept m ap i s shown in Figure 6-11. This route would provide access to Kimball Park, National City Library, City Hall, and retail destinations along 8th & 18th Streets. Round trip distance is 3.0 miles. T AKStOR 141 fp FEHR & PEEPS 7,ANSTf1R1ATTON CONS) TANTS NATIONAL CITY SHUTTLE ROUTE 1 Sept 2010 0009 0145AGraphicsWlAFigure 6 9 Nal o•fal C'.y Shuttle Rt FIGURE 6-9 fp FEIIR & PaRS IRA\SPCRTATION ',ANTS NATIONAL CITY SHUTTLE ROUTE 2 Sept 2010 0C09-01451GraphresvAl1Frqure 6 10 National City Shuttle Rt 2 FIGURE 6-10 FIGURE 6-11 v:r h 0 u City of National City General Plan Up January 2011 Service Characteristics For this preliminary evaluation, all routes would share the same service characteristics, which are summarized in Table 6.16. TABLE 6.16: PROPOSED SHUTTLE ROUTE SERVICE CHARACTERISTICS Peak Off -Peak Weekend Service Span 7-10 AM, 4-7 PM 10 AM-4 PM 9 AM — 6 PM Frequency 15 Min 30 Min 30 Min The service frequency of the routes should be coordinated with the trolley and BRT schedules so as to provide efficient transfers and minimized wait times. Vehicle Types A variety of options are available, from cutaway buses to traditional 40' transit buses. Regular cutaway buses range from approximately $150,000-$225,000 depending on length, interior configuration, and fuel technology. They typically offer 18-34 seats and a re up to 36 feet in length. Transit buses are a m ore expensive option, but can hold more passengers than cutaway buses, including standing passengers. For example, a compressed natural gas version (CNG) version of the 30 seated passenger 30 ft El Dorado E- Z R ider I I transit bus c osts appr oximately $350,000. A 40 s eated passenger 40 f t I ow f loor North American Bus Industries (NABI) transit bus costs approximately $500,000. For this preliminary evaluation, capital costs are assumed for a regular cutaway bus ($150,000 each). Cutaway Bus Capital and Operation Cost Estimates Operation Costs 30' Transit Bus A conceptual transit routing plan was prepared to estimate operating costs for each route. The transit routing pl an as sumed t he r outes s hown i n F igures 6-9 through 6-11 and t he s ervice c haracteristics detailed above. Assuming an av erage speed of 12 mph for shuttle operations and a c ost per revenue FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSU LrAN1S City of National City General Plan Upda January 2011 service hour of $72, the inputs from the routing plan were used to estimate the revenue hours, daily cost, and a nnual c ost f or t he t hree r outes. Annual oper ating c ost f or year r ound s ervice would be approximately $400,000 per route. Each route would need to operate two buses during peak service (15 minute headways) and one bus during off-peak/weekend service; therefore the conceptual cost to operate a g iven r oute would be ge nerally equivalent f or al I r outes. The c ost t o operate one of t he proposed shuttle routes is displayed by weekday and weekend service in Table 6.17. TABLE 6.17: ESTIMATED ANNUAL COST FOR OPERATING A PROPOSED SHUTTLE ROUTE Daily Revenue Hours Daily Cost Annual Cost Weekday 18 $1,300 $330,000 Weekend/Holiday 9 $650 $70,000 Capital Costs The primary capital cost is the shuttles themselves. For the service assumed in this evaluation, a total of seven (7) buses would be needed (six in operation and one spare) for an estimated cost of approximately $1 million. Capital costs can also include non purchase -related vehicle expenses such as repair (engine rebuilds, d amage), r egistration, i nsurance, and bac kup r ental a nd other t angible go ods r elated t o t he operation of t he s huttle s uch as u niforms, keys, locks, r adios, a nd m iscellaneous s upplies. F ederal Transit Administration (FTA) S ection 5307 a nd 53 09 Bus f unds c an be us ed for t he p urchase of new vehicles as well as for the capital -related operating costs as described above Next Steps Prior to actual implementation, additional study would be required to refine routing, stop locations, and service characteristics. forecast ridership, and develop an operations and implementation plan for each of the proposed shuttle routes. Other key issues that need to be addressed: • Schedule coordination with other local and regional services including timed transfers at Trolley and BRT stations. Coordination activities should also address interface with other local bus routes to ensure efficiencies and minimize duplications. For example Route 1 provides similar services as portions of MTS Routes 962/963 along Plaza Boulevard. • Provision of improved bus infrastructure and priority treatments to improve operations and schedule adherence. Examples in queue jumpers at key locations and possible bus turnaround at t he 8'" Street T rolley Station, The 8 th Street T rolley s tation on ly has a westbound s top f or buses. The current configuration requires westbound traveling buses to begin eastbound service by making a left on Harbor Boulevard, left on Civic Center Drive, and then left on National City Boulevard. 6.5 GOODS MOVEMENT FACILITIES The majority of the goods movement within the City of National City will continue to revolve around the 168 acre National City Marine Terminal. Future transportation issues for the marine terminal are primarily related to improving and enhancing freeway access, while minimizing the impact of the truck activity on other roadways within the City of National City. Two 1-5 freeway interchanges, at Bay Marina Drive and Civic Center Drive/harbor Drive are located near the Marine T erminal. N either of these i nterchanges has t he ge ometry or t raffic c apacity t o route trucks F E IRARS PO PEERS J ION COhi,UitANTS City of National City Genets January 2011 Update w t efficiently to the freeway system. In addition, the increase in commercial redevelopment activity along Bay Marina Drive has raised concerns about high volumes of truck activity on the adjacent streets. Previous studies have shown that Bay Marina Drive and its intersections can physically accommodate the existing an d forecast t ruck v olumes. The nat ure of t he t ruck bus iness at t he Marine T erminal an d t he adjacent industrial areas is such that the peak hour percentages are much less than those of a commuter -oriented land use. Even though Bay Marina Drive can handle the truck volumes, it is generally not desirable to have a high truck presence adjacent to the types of retail land uses planned for this area. As part of the South 1-5 Freeway/harbor Drive Project Study Report (2007), Caltrans examined a number of freeway a nd s urface roadway improvements within t he v icinity of the N ational C ity M arine T erminal. Options r eviewed included i mprovement of bot h the 1-5 i nterchanges at B ay Marian D rive an d C ivic Center D rive, i ntersection striping a nd c hannelization i mprovements. and po tential r ealignment of t he connections between Harbor Drive, Tidelands, and Civic Center Drive. In addition the Port of San Diego and SANDAG have s uccessful pur sued T rade C orridor 1 mprovement F unds (TCIF) for key f reeway enhancement projects. The City should continue to coordinate with Caltrans. SANDAG, and the Port to promote improvements in this area. t PE=ELLS A hSP0R [A't [O' fONSdtTANTS City of Natio; January 201 APPENDIX A: PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS 36-40Curb to Curb 60' Right of Way 1 fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (36-40') FIGURE 1 Sidewalk/Landsna Travel Lane Travel 1. ane Parallel Parking 40' Curb to Curb 60' Right of Way i Sidewalk/Landscape g Sidcwalkll ennscape 8-10' BikeLan° I ravel Lane 5-6 1-12' Travel Lane 11-12' Bike Lane 5-6 Parallel Parking 40 44' Curb to Curb 60' Right of Way sidewalklcandscape 8-1 fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (40-44') FIGURE 2 46-48' Curb to Curb -- 80' Right of Way 48' Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way 48' Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (46'-48') FIGURE 3 Buffer FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 52' Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way naVIA L woe 7r,vel Lan, 52Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (52-56) FIGURE 4-1 I\J 52' Cu b to Curb 80' Right of Way 52 56 Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (52'-56) FIGURE 42 SI,ewal0 Landscape 10' P.-a. Parking Travel !_aqe 10' Sidewalk) _a0dscape 10' Pa,1171 0,070 Ane 0' 5' 5' ' ;:0Z:00!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Lt 117tl! .07 / 60Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way 4.1wiat. 10' 11• fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS 60' Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (60'-64') FIGURE 5-1 IC) iravalaane Lied, 81 1 ravel Lane Lane 11.18 .ane 5' 11' 10 11. 60 64Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way rLr:ne 5 I 9' Travel Lane "He tee IUM LEne 64' Curb to Curb 80' Right of Way fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (60'-64') FIGURE 5-2 70' Curb to Curb 100' Right of Way fp FEHR & PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSUL -ANTS NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED COMMUNITY CORRIDORS STREET CROSS -SECTIONS (70') FIGURE 6 City of National City General Pia January 2071 it APPENDIX B: INTERSECTION LOS ANALYSIS FOR PLAZA BOULEVARD WITH TRANSIT OPTIONS HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Plaza Blvd. & Highland Ave. 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/912010 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Heavy Vehicles (%) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g!C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vts Ratio Prot v1s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach L0S 1.6tett Sttinmefy , HCM Average Control Delay HCM Votume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group J 3 i 1 Wt31 . T a tat NB3 R ,,, SBL! - SET` -SBF tt 32 113 23 72 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1787 4957 1770 0.95 1.00 0.95 1787 4957 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 173% 173°Jo 173% 150% 60 212 43 117 0 27 0 0 60 228 0 117 1% 2% 2°Jo 2°Jo Prot Prot 3 8 7 r 284 110 49 517 58 37 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 463 179 80 843 95 60 0 113 0 0 41 0 463 66 80 843 54 60 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Perm Prot Perm Prot 4 5 2 1 6 4 2 7.0 31.5 12.3 ` 36.8 36.8 11.3 29.5 . 29.5 6.7 24.9 7.0 33.5 12.3 38.8 36.8 11.3 31.5 31.5 6.7 26.9 0.07 0.34 0.12 0.39 0.37 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.27 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 125 1661 218 1373 583 200 1115 499 119 937 0.03 0.05 c0.07 c0.13 0.05 c0.24 0.03 c0,18 0.04 0.03 0.48 0.14 0.54 ± 0.34 0,11 0.40 0.76 0.11 0.50 0.67 44.7 23.2 41.2 21.5 20.8 41.2 30.8 24.3 45.0 32.6 1.00 1.00 0.70 ; 0.37 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.65 1.1 0.2 1.3 0.7 0.4 0.5 3.0 0.1 0.9 1.3 45.8 23.3 29.9 8.5 2.0 41.7 33.8 24.4 32.9 22.5 D C C A A D C C C C 27.6 10.3 33.5 23.4 C B C C 24.0 0.57 100.0 61.4°/a 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 13 16.0 349 41 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3483 1.00 3483 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 569 67 10 0 626 0 2% 2% Plaza Blvd 3125/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Plaza Blvd. & L Ave. 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 Movementrlu lli" Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt EBR. VyBL +flo 23 263 18 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5037 1770 5051 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow,(perm) 1770 5037 1770 5051 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 150°!° 150% 150% 150% ' 150% Adj. Flow (vph) 38 429 29 52 668 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 4 0 0 3 Lane Group Flow (vph) 38 454 0 52 696 Turn Type Prot Prot 2 1 Vd8T ..: `Vt1001 Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated gfC Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perna v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental` Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersection Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 9.6 68.4 9.6 70.4 0.10 0.70 4.0 6.0 0.5 3.5 170 3546 c0.02 0.09 0.22 41.8 0.84 0.2 35.2 D 0.13 4.8 0.68 0,1 3.4 A 5.8 A 32 410 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.99 0.95 1.00 5.3 5.3 0.05 4.0 0.5 94 c0.03 0.55 46.2 1.01 3.9 50.6 D 64.1 66.1 0.66 6.0 3.5 3339 c0.14 0.21 6.7 0.58 0.1 4.0 A 7.2 A t i 4, 19 22 12 13 25 30 26 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1805 1583 1821 1583 0.74 1.00 0.83 1.00 1384 1583 1541 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 50% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 31 36 20 21 41 49 42 0 0 0 18 0 0 37 0 0 56 3 0 90 5 Perm Perm Perm Perm 11.6 HCM Level of Service 0.26 100.0 43.3% 15 Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 10.3 12.3 0.12 6.0 3.5 170 4 10.3 12.3 0.12 6.0 3.5 195 0.04 0.00 0.33 0.01 40.1 38.5 1.00 1.00 1.3 0.0 41.4 38.6 D D 40.6 D B 12.0 A 10.3 12,3 0.12 6,0 3.5 190 4 10.3 12.3 0.12 6,0 3.5 195 c0.06 0.00 0.47 0.03 40.8 38,6 1.00 1.00 2.2 0.1 43.0 38.6 D D 41.6,_ D` Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Plaza Blvd. & N Ave r C 4- k• •, :W01r14,b, MOWe- Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay: d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 7 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 150% 11 0 11 Prot 5 1.3 1.3 0.01 4,0 1.9 23 c0.01 0.48 49.0 0.96 5.6 52.7 D 246 1900 4.0 0.91 0.97 1.00 4951 1.00 4951 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 401 86 28 0 459 0 2 40.1 42.1 0.42 6.0 2.2 2084 c0.09 0.22 18.5 0.67 0.2 12.7 B 13.6 B 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 4, r 53 131 409 5 38 2 71 12 5 7 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 2.0 2.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0,96 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 1770 5076 1778 1583 1747 0.95 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.83 1770 5076 1377 1583 1482 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 214 667 8 62 3 116 20 8 11 0 1 0 0 0 100 0 10 0 214 675 0 0 65 16 0 29 0 Prot Perm Perm Perm 34.2 34.2 0.34 4.0 1.8 605 c0.12 0.35 24.6 0.37 0.1 9.3 A Intersection Summ�rygTM HCM Average Control Delay 11.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.29 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 6 73.0 75.0 0.75 6.0 2.2 3807 0.13 0.18 3.6 0.34 0.1 1.3 A 3.2 A HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 8 8 11.7 11.7 9.7 13.7 13.7 11.7 0.14 0.14 0.12 4.0 4.0 6.0 1.9 1.9 1.9 189 217 173 c0.05 0.01 0.02', 0.34 0.07 0.17 39.1 37.6 39.8 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.4 0.1 0.2 39.5 37.7 39.9 D D D 38.3 39.9 ., D D' 10';0 A Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Plaza Blvd. & Palm Ave. 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 MO Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Ulil. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR'Reduction (vph)! Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio ClearanceTime (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v.'s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental` Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tnterse�; Tmal = d IA/BR'°`,r{ + a,1 ft,.BR" SBL':Iai T.. S3 20 210 13 87 486 98 31 144 98 131 140 17 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 5041 1770 4958 1770 1750 1770 1832 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 5041 1770 4958 1770 1750 1770 1832 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 127% 127% 127% ':150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 33 342 21 120 671 135 51 235 160 214 228 28 0 7 0 0 26 0 0 25 0 0 5 0 33 356 0 120 780 0 51 370 0 214 251 0 Prot Prot Split Split 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 4 4.5 24.7 12.7 32.9 23.5 23.5 17.1 17.1 4.5 26.7 12,7 34,9 25.5 25.5 19.1 19.1 0.04 0.27 0.13 0.35 0.26 0.26 0.19 0.19 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.5 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 80 1346 225 1730 451 446 338 350 c0.02 0.07 0.07 c0.16 0.03 c0.21 0.12 c0.14 0.41 0.26 0.53 0.45 0.11 0.83 0.63 46.5 28.9 40.9 251 28 6 35.2 37.2 0.83 0.64 0.65 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.2 0.5 1.2 0.8 0.1 11.7 3.2 40.0 18.9 27.9 13.4 28.6 46.9 40.4 D B C B C D D 20.6 15.3 44.8 C B D' HCM Average Control Delay 27.8 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.62 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.3% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 C 0.72 37.9 1.00 6.2 44.1 D' 42.4 0' Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 SB 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS I t rsectio 1 Summary 0.92 100% 0 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Lengths) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 4- EBt, V'i !`i EBR INEENT 4\ SBT SBR fit r 1) T 4 r 0 290 269 393 624 0 0 0 0 365 1 214 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 " 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1686 1583 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1686 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 100% 100% 100% 100% 127% 127% 127% 400 371 543 861 0 0 0 0 504 1 295 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 400 371 543 861 0 0 0 0 252 253 295 Free Prot Split Free 1 6 4 Free Free 46.9 100.0 20.1 71.2 19.6 19.6 100.0 47.5 100,0 20 3' 71.8 20.2 20.2 100.0 0.48 1.00 0.20 0.72 0.20 0.20 1.00 4.6 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.6 4.5 2.0 4.5 2.0 2.0 1681 1583 697, 2541 '' 340 341 1583 0.11 c0.16 c0.24 0.15 c0.15 0.23 0.19 0.24 0.23 0.78 0.34 0.74 0.74 0.19 15.5 0.0 37.7 5.3 37.4 37.5 0.0 0.67 1.00 0.75 0.52 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.3 0.3 4.7 0.3 7.4 7.4 0.3 10.7 0.3 33.0 3.1 44.9 44.9 0.3 B A C A D D A 5.7 14.6 0.0 28.4 A B A C 16.0 0.52 100.0 56.5% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 8.0 B Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 NB 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 4- vet+t EBL - t~'..." EBR WBL Yd6171 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 157 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 Frt 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 Flt Permitted 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% Adj. Flow (vph) 217 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 217 Tum Type Prot Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) 4\ t 4/ :NBR. SB 'i'`8 Tt 538 0 0 628 634 365 0 564 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 3539 1583 3433 1583 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 3539 1583 3433 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% . 100°/d 100% 127% 127% 127% 100% 127% 100% 100% 100% 743 0 0 867 875 504 0 779 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 743 0 0 867 875 504 0 779 0 0 0 10.7 71.4 10.9 72.0 0.11 072 4.2 4.6 2.0 4.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 374 2548 v/s Ratio Prot 0.06 0.21 Ws Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.58 0.29 Uniform Delay, d1 42.4 5.0 Progression Factor 0.96 0.27 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 0.3 Delay (s) 42.3 1.6 Level of Service D A Approach Delay (s) 10.8 Approach LOS B tr tersect on Surt 56.5 57.1 0.57 4.6 4.5 2021 0.24 Free Prot Free 4 Free Free 100.0 19.4 100.0 100.0 20,0 100.0 1.00 0.20 1.00 4.6 2.0 1583 '< 687 1583 c0.15 c0.55 0.49 0.43 0.55 0.73 0.49 12.2 0.0 37.5 0.0 0.81 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.5 1.1 3.5 1.1 10.5 1.1 41.0 1.1 B A D A 5.8 A 16.8 B 0.0 A HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 10.5 0.59 100.0 56.5% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 4.0 B Plaza Blvd 3i25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Plaza Blvd. & Grove St. 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS trtersOcilfSummary,; BL II irl, EBR WBL' 4- w T 821 200 22 835 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 4936 1770 5083 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 4936 1770 5083 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 127%'- 127% 43 1133 276 30 1153 4 0 34 0 0 0 0 43 1375 0 30 1157 0 Prot Prot 5 2 1 4 9 41.8 4.9 ; 43.8 0.05 0.44 4,0 6.0 2.0 2.8 87 2162 c0.02 c0.28 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 4.3 4.3 0.04 4,0 2.0 76 0.02 6 42.7 43.2 0.43 4.5 2.8 2196 0.23 0.49 0.64 0.39 0.53 46.3 21.9 46.6 20.9 1.07 0.63 1.22 0.32 1.5 to 1.0 0.7 51.3 15.2 57.7 7.3 D B E A 16.3 8.6 B A 19,4 0.74 100,0 69.9% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 4\ d 1rlip NBT:, NBR ; let 4, 3 330 13 25 2 19 53 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.00 1777 1583 1680 0.67 1.00 0.99 1252 1583 1665 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127°/0- ' 127% 127% 127°/0. 127% 127% 456 18 35 3 26 73 0 0 9 0 44 0 0 474 26 0 58 0 Perm Perm Perm 4 37.9 37.9 39.9 39.9 0.40 0.40 6.0 6,0 2.0 2.0 500 632 c0.38 0.02 0.95 0.04 29.0 18.4 1.00 1.00 27.1 0.0 56.2 18.4 E B 53.6 D 8.0 37.9 39.9 0.40 6.0 2.0 664 0.03 0.09 18.7 1.00 0.0 18.7 B 18.7 B Plaza Blvd 3125/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Plaza Blvd. & Euclid Ave. 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 oveini'= Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prat) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph), Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases BBL EB EBR WB 4if ° ar;, Bf? ... '''il l I" J+ }� i111a 1 �'; 4'g E 1 its'' I ') 307 403 59 60 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 3433 3539 1583 1770 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 3433 3539 1583 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 128% 424 556 81 83 0 0 46 0 424 556 35 83 Prot Perm Prot 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.8 40.8 40 8 Effective Green, g (s) " 19.8 42.8 42.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.43 0.43 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.4 2.4 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 680 1515 678, v!s Ratio Prot c0.12 0.16 v/s Ratio Perm 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.37 0 05 Uniform Delay, d1 36.7 19.4 16.7 Progression Factor 0.95 1.08 1.61 Incremental, Delay, d2 1.0 0.6 0.1 Delay (s) 36.0 21.4 27.0 Level of Service D C C Approach Delay (s) 27.7 Approach LOS C HCM Average Control Delay 34.3 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.7% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 7.3 7.3 0.07 4.0 2.0 129 0.05 60 1900 4.0 0.91 0.99 1.00 5019 1.00 5019 0.92 0.92 128°/, ' 128% 836 79 10 905 28.3 30.3 0.30 6.0 2.4 1521 c0.18 57 127 1900 1900 3.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 127% 175 0 0 175 Prot, 3 13.7 13.7 0.14 3.0 1.9 242 c0.10 441 1900 40 0.95 0.98 1.00 3468 1.00 3468 0.92 127% 609 13 6 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 94 91 329 247 0 0 138 0 690 0 91 438 Prot 7 24.1 26.1 0.26 6.0 2.0 905 c0.20 0.64 0.59 0.72 0.76 45.1 29.6 41.3 34.1 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8.0 1.7 8.7 3.5 53.0 31.3 50.0 37.6 D C D D 33 2 40.1 C ?D HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 7.8 7.8 0.08 4.0! 1.9 138 0.05 0.66 44.8 1.00 8.4 53.2 D 238 179 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.94 1.00 3312 1.00 3312 19.2 21.2 0.21 6.0 2.0 702 0.13 0.62 35.8 1.00 1.3 37.0 39.2 D Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 8 68 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 20: Plaza Blvd. & D Ave. 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 J _ 1 4 &s '1 t t ,, EBT BR1 iG;ii WBfig.`„WBT..:,; WB NBL NBT..: stkf BI .iiiiiii'SB1t't'i ,.;SBf Lane Configurations ti, 'I 11 t I II 1, Volume (vph) 6 106 12 30 263 42 18 269 76 36 197, _ 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 ; 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99', Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3484 1770 3466 1770 1863 1583 1770 1849 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow 1770 3484 1770 3466 1770 1863 1583 1770 1849 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% ' 173% Adj. Flow (vph) 11 199 23 56 495 79 34 506 143 68 370 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 0 0 11 ` 0 0 0 19 0 2 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 214 0 56 563 0 34 506 124 68 387 Tum Type Prot Prot Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 1.0 28.9 5.5 33.4 3.7 26.1 26.1 6.0 Effective Green, g (s) 1.0 30.9 5.5 35.4 3,7 28.1 28.1 6.0 Actuated g!C Ratio 0.01 0.36 0.06 0.41 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.07 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 ` " 6.0 6.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 20 1245 113 1418 76 605 514 123 v/s Ratio Prot 0.01 0.06 c0.03 c0.16 0.02 c0.27 c0.04 vls Ratio Perm 0.08 vic Ratio 0.55 0.17 0.50 0.40 0.45 0.84 0.24 0.55 0.60 Uniform Delay, d1 42.5 19.0 39.2 18.0 40.4 27.1 21.4 39.0 23.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 17.2 0.3 1.2 0.8 1.5 9.6 0.2 3.0 1.2 Delay (s) 59.8 19.3 40.4 18.9 41.9 36.7 21.6 42.0 Level of Service E B D B D D C D Approach Delay (s) 21.2 20.8 33.8 Approach LOS C C C HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) ±, c Critical Lane Group 26.7 0.57 86.5 61.3% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 B 28.4 30.4 0.35 6.0 2.5 650, 0.21 24.2 C Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 21: 8th St. & Highland Ave. 2030_Opt_AM_6 Lanes 9/9/2010 } -• k 4\ t `- 1 movernent ':, rE 1,,iirri, `- lir,1 WBR . , NBL NBT NB " Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 46 195 48 119 1015 45 222 653 52 43 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.99 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3435 1770 3517 1770 3500 1770! Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3435 1770 3517 1770 :' 3500 1770, Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 150% 150% 150% 150% Adj. Flow (vph) 64 269 66 164 1401 62 362 1065 85 70 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 26 0 0 3 0 0 6 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 309 0 164 1460 0 362 1144 0 70 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vlc Ratio 0.75 Uniform Delay, di 47.0 Progression Factor 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 30.8 Delay (s) 77.8 Level of Service. E Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS $won Summary 414 *I fi 4T 343 49 1900 4.0 0.95 0.98 1.00 3473 1.00 3473 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 559 80 11 0 628 4.8 14.3 31.5 41.0 18.0 33.4 4.8 20.2 4.8 14.3 31.5 41.0 18.0 33.4 4.8 20.2 0.05 0.14 0.32 0.41 0.18 0.33 0.05 0.20 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 85 491 558 1442 319 1169 85 702 0.04 c0.09 0.09 c0.42 c0.20 c0.33 0.04 0.18 0.63 0.29 1.01 1.13 0.98 0.82 0.89 40.4 25.9 29.5 41.0 32.9 47.2 38.9 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.69 0.91 1.00 1.00 2.5 0.3 26.8 _ 90.2 20.7 44.9 16.2 42.9 26.2 56.3 118.5 50.6 92.1 55.1 D C E F D F E 48.5 53.3 66.9 58.7 D D E E HCM Average Control Delay 58.6 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.00 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group M Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 120 E 1900 iII Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Plaza Blvd. & Highland Ave. 9/22/2010 ��! . EBL EPA i Lane Configurations 5 tits 'ft Volume (vph) 112 406 90 204 233 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 4947 1770 3539 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 4947 1770 3539 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph); 173% 173% 173% 120% 120% Adj. Flow (vph) 211 763 169 266 304 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 31 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 901 0 266 304 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 3 8 7 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 v/s Ratio Prot 0.12 vls Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.62 0.65 Uniform Delay, d1 40.9 34.9 1.00 1.00 2.6 2.4 43.5 37.2 Level of Service ` D D Approach Delay (s) 38.4 Approach LOS D Intersect Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length, (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 28.8 30.8 0.28 6.0 3.0 1385 c0.18 45,8' 0.79 110.0 74.8% 15 27.5 29.5 0.27 6.0 3.0 949 0.09 19.7 19.7 0.18 4.0 2.0 317 c0 15 WBT WBE ii ;t4F1t= BT NBR S SBT SBII r 146 69 459 153 256 582 41 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3504 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3504 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 120% 115% 115% 115% 115% 115% 115% 190 86 574 191 320 728 51 143 0 0 103 0 5 0 48 86 574 88 320 774 0 Perm Prot Perm Prot 5 2 1 6 4 2 27.5 7.9 19.3 19.3 22.2 33.6 27.5 7.9 ' 21.3 21.3 22.2 35.6 0.25 0.07 0.19 0.19 0.20 0.32 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4-0 6.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 396 127 685 307 357 1134 0.05 c0.16 c0.18 0.22 0.03 0.06, 0.84 0.32 0.12 0.68 0.84 0.29 0.90 0.68 43.6 32.2 31.9 49.8 42.7 37.9 42.8 32.3 1.12 1.34 4.49 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.32 0.53 15.6 0.8 0.6 10.7 88 0.5 3.0 0.2 64.6 43.9 143.8 60.5 51.5 38.4 59.3 17.3 EDF EDDE B 76.1 49.5 29.5 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 D Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Plaza Blvd. & L Ave. 9/22/2010 Movement EBT LBC - Lane Configurations titto Volume (vph) 85 734 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4 0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 Frt 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5022 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5022 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 150% 150% 150% Adj. Flow (vph) 139 1197 109 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 8 WI WBR NBC tfk 67 103 597 41 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 ; 0.99 0.95 1.00 1770 5036 0.95 1.00 1770 5036 0.92 0.92 0.92 150%'', 150% 150% 37 44 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.98 1821 0.56 1039 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 92 1900 4'.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 150% 168 973 67 60 72 150 0 0` 6 0 0 0 116 Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 1298 0 168 1034 0 0 132 34 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 21.0 57.8 13.4 50.2 Effective Green, g (s) 21.0 59.8 13.4 52.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.54 0.12 0.47 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 0.5 3.5 0.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 338 2730 216 ` 2390 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.26 c0.09 0.21 Ws Ratio Perm 0.13 0.02 c0.17 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.48 0.78 0.43 0.56 0.09 0.77 0.09 Uniform Delay, d1 39.1 15.4 46.9 19.1 37.8 33.7 39.9 33.7 Progression Factor 0.74 0.45 0.86 0.36 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.5 14.1 0.5 3.4 0.1 10.9 ` 0.1 Delay (s) 29.3 7.4 54.3 7.3 41.2 33.9 50.8 33.8 Level of Service C A D A D C D C Approach Delay (s) 9 5 13.9 37.3 47.0 Approach LOS A B D D 54 Intersecitton< tlmmary, HCM Average Control May HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 17.2 0.59 110.0 65.8% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 22.8 24.8 0.23 6.0 3.5 234 22.8 24.8 0.23 6.0 3.5 357 12.0 Sa+a47ii 4 96 64 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.98 1.00 1830 " 1583 0.76 1.00 1415 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 150%0 150% 100% 88 157 70 0 0 38 0 245 32 Perm Perm 22.8 24.8 0.23 6.0 3.5 319 4 22.8 24.8 0.23 6.0 3.5 357 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Plaza Blvd. & N Ave. 9/22/2010 BL �► �# { I- k 4\ Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph)' Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated giC Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vic Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 36 736 424246 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1770 4975 1770 0.95 1.00 0.95 1770 4975 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150% 59 1200 202 401 0 18 0 0 59 1384 0 401 Prot Prot 5 2 1 8.0 8.0 0.07 4,0 1.9 129 0.03 47.0 49.0 0.45 6,0 2.2 2216 c0.28 28.3 28.3 0.26 4.0 1.8 455 c0.23 4+ 652 4 88 5 289 67 13 22 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 5080 ' 1779 1583 1751 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.57 5080 1203 1583 1029 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% ' 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 1063 7 143 8 471 109 21 36 0 0 0 0 382 0 10 0 1070 0 0 151 89 0 156 0 Perm Perm Perm 67.3 69.3 0.63 6.0 2.2 3200 0.21 0.46 0.62 0.88 0.33 48.9 23.4 39.2 9.5 0.72 0.56 0.67 0.80 0.8 1.2 16.4 0.3 36.0 14.3 42.7 7.9 D B D A 15.1 17.4 B B �r� iii � trm a 18.7 20.7 0.19 6.0 1.9 226 8 18.7 20.7 0.19 6.0 1.9 298 18.7 20.7 0.19 6.0 1.9 194 0.13 0.06 c0.15 0.67 0.30 0.81 41.5 38.4 42.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 5.7 0.2 20.0 47.1 38.6 62.7 D D E 40.7 62.7 D E HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min). c Critical Lane Group 22.4 0.74 110.0 71.2% 15 HCM Level of Service Surn of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 C Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Plaza Blvd. & Palm Ave. 9/22/2010 tavemerit" Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Fit Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, dt Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS ip etseCc#kfnrSummary 1110 111 1026 17 170 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1770 5073 1770 0.95 1.00 0.95 1770 5073 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 115% 115% 115% 115% 139 1282 21 212 0 1 0' 0 139 1302 0 212 Prot Prot 5 2 1 Nl NaTr NB,f =+ SBT '' Safi 724 149 35 124 74 219 198 78 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 4955 1770 1759 1770 1784 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 4955 1770 1759 1770 1784 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 115% 115% ' 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% 905 186 42 148 88 262 237 93 26 0 0 20 . 0 0 13 0 1065 0 42 216 0 262 317 0 Split Split 6 8 8 4 4 12.5 35.1 17.0 39.6 12.5 37.1 17.0 41.6 0.11 0.34 0.15 0.38 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.5 201 1711 274 1874 0.08 c0.26 c0.12 0.21 0.69 0.76 0.77 0.57 46.9 32.5 44.7 27.1 0.79 0.67 0.81 0.68 6.3 2.5 10.6 1.1 43.4 24.2 46.8 19.7 D C D B 26.1 24.1 C c 14.6 14.6 16.6 16.6 0.15 0.15 6.0 6.0 2.3 2.3 267 265 0.02 c0.12 0.16 0.82 40.6 45.2 1.00 1.00 0.2 16.9 40.8 62.1 D E 58.9 E 21.3 21.3 23.3 23.3 0.21 0.21 6.0 6.0 2.3 2.3 375 378 0.15 c0.18 0.70 0.84 40.1 41.5 1.00 1.00 4.9 14.5 45.0 56.0 D E 51.1 D' HCM Average Control Delay 32.0 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.79 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.9%0 Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 C Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 SB 9/22/2010 4\ Movement`=.'' (I, :,, Eat. Eel': EE1 + @hill 1 T': WBR`,I'I1JBL4ti.; N8T NBR,.-,..SBLk6SSTli'w013 Lane Configurations +T r 5vi HH ►i 4 r Volume (vph) 0 887 528 490 804 0 0 0 0 687 10 389 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85a Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd- Flow (prat) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1688 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1688 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 100% 100% 100% 100% 127% 127% 127% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1224 729 676 1110 0 0 0 0 948 14 537 RTOR Reduction (vph)' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1224 729 676 1110 0 0 0 0 483 479 537 Turn Type Free Prot Split Free Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 4 Permitted Phases Free Free Actuated Green, G (s) 36.9 110.0 24.4 65.5 35.3 35.3 110.0 Effective Green, g (s) 37.5 110.0 24.6 66.1 35.9 35.9 110.0 Actuated giC Ratio 0.34 1.00 0.22 0.60 0.33 0.33 1.00 Clearance Time (s) 4.6 4.2 4.6 4,6' 4.6 Vehicle Extension (s) 4.5 2.0 4.5 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 1206 1583 768 2127 549 551 1583 v/s Ratio Prot c0.35 c0.20 0.31 c0.29 0.28 v/s Ratio Perm 0.46 v/c Ratio 1.01 0.46 Uniform Delay, d l 36.3 0.0 Progression Factor 0.46 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 26,7 0.8 Delay (s) 43.3 0.8 Level of Service D A Approach Delay (s) 27.4 Approach LOS " C It f c ort.SulainorY 0.88 41.3 1.54 8.2 72.0 E 0.52 12.8 1.50 0.7 19.9 B' 39.6 0 0.0 A 0.88 35.0 1.00 14.5 49.5 D 0.34 0.87 0.34 34.8 0.0 1.00 1.00 13.3 0.6 48.1 0.6 D A 31.5 C; HCM Average Control Delay 32.7 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.93 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 G Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6: Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 NB 9/22/2010 --A Movment_ Lane Configurations ft Volume (vph) 301 1270 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 Fit Permitted 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% 127% 100% Adj. Flow (vph) 416 1753 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 416 1753 0 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 5 2 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 17.7 74.6 Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.74 Uniform Delay, d1 43.9 Progression Factor 1.17 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 Delay (s) 51.6 Level of Service D Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 17.9 0.16 4.2 2.0 559 0.12 75.2 0.68 4.6 4.5 2419 c0.50 0.72 10.9 1.56 0,9 17.8 B 24.3 C \ tt EBR,7-,---111115EA”131",,--5WBR.NBL N1BR ' 8141.1'"" SBT SBR r 0 0 870 441 481 0 648 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 3433 1583 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 3433 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 100% 127% 127% 127% 100% 127% 100% 100% 100% 0 1201 609 664 0 895 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1201 609 664 0 895 0 0 0 Free Prot Free 4 Free 52.7 110.0 26.2 53.3 110.0 26.8 0.48 1.00 0.24 4.6 4.6 4.5 2.0 Free 110.0 110.0 1.00 1715 1583 836 1583 0.34 c0.19 0.38 0.70 0.38 0.79 22.1 0.0 39.0 0.60 1.00 1.00 1.9 0.5 4,9 15.0 0.5 43.9 B A D 10.2 B HCM Average Central Delay of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.74 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.8°/. Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 0.57 0.57 0.0 1.00 1.5 1.5 A 19.5 0.0 B A 8.0 G Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Plaza Blvd. & Grove St. 9/22/2010 MOvenieht - - -' - EBL EBT - EiR ,. 'ii‘lV13t--, --'', INBT WBF .iiii:NBL ' NBT i''',, NEiR, ' ' S131 iiiirollaoIREP$N4 Lane Configurations 11 ftt. ) tft. +1 r 4. Volume (vph) 41 1361 451 67 955 2 298 21 51 12 23 47 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.92 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 4895 1770 5084 1780 1583 1707 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.80 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 4895 1770 5084 1196 1583 1381 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% Adj. Flow (vph) 57 1879 623 92 1318 3 411 29 70 17 32 65 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 52 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 0 44 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 2450 0 92 1321 0 0 440 53 0 70 0 Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 4 8 Actuated Green, G (s) 6.9 51.2 8.8 53.1 34.0 34.0 34.0 Effective Green, g (s) 6.9 53.2 8.8 55,1 36.0 36.0 36.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.06 0.48 0.08 0.50 0.33 0.33 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.8 2.0 2.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 111 2367 142 2547 391 518 452 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.50 0.05 c0.26 Ws Ratio Perm c0.37 0.03 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.51 1.04 0.65 0.52 1.13 0.10 0.16 Uniform Delay, di 49.9 28.4 49.1 18.5 37.0 25,7 26.2 Progression Factor 1.27 0.83 0.45 0.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 25.8 3.4 0.3 84.1 0.0 0.1 Delay (s) 64.9 49.3 25.3 3.4 121.1 25.8 26.3 Level of Service E D C A F C C Approach Delay (s) 49.7 4.8 108.0 26.3 Approach LOS D A F C IntersittiOnSunui*i. HCM Average Control Delay 41.8 liCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.99 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.9% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 8.0 E Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Plaza Blvd. & Euclid Ave. 9/22/2010 f EBB sr" ,riEBR • WBL. WBT WBR VIONINEIVN. Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 26.0 38.0 38.0 Effective Green, g ($) 26.0 40,0 40.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.36 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6,0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.4 2.4 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 811 1287 576 v/s Ratio Prot 0.11 c0.39 v/s Ratio Perm 0,06 vfc Ratio 0.48 1.06 0.15 0.66 0.87 Uniform Delay, di 36.2 35.0 23.6 47.1 40.4 Progression Factor 0.36 0.31 0.16 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay. d2 0.0 33.3 0.1 6.5 8 8 Delay (s) 13.0 44.0 3.9 53.5 49.2 Level of Service BD A D D Approach Delay (s) 34.2 49.7 Approach LOS G D 283 1900 4.0 0.97 1.00 0.95 3433 0.95 3433 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 391 1367 0 0 391 1367 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group tt+ 990 120 92 670 79 106 256 95 159 453 '' 266 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0' 4.0 4.0 4.0 40 4,0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 1770 5005 1770 3396 1770 3343 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 1770 5005 1770 3396 1770 3343 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 128% 128% ' 128% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 166 128 932 110 146 353 131 219 625 367 79 0 13 0 0 33 0 0 74 0 87 128 1029 0 146 451 0 219 918 Perm Prot Prot Prot 1 6 3 8 7 r +fr. 49.1 0.98 110.0 88.8% 15 12.0 12,0 0.11 4.0 2.0 193 0,07 24.0 26.0 0.24 6.0. 2.4 1183 c0.21 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.7 12.7 0.12 4.0 1.9 204 0.08 23.1 25.1 0.23 6.0 2.0 775 0.13 16.9 27.3 16.9 29.3 0.15 0.27 4.0 6.0 1.9 2.0 272 890 c0.12 c0.27 0.72 0.58 0.81 1.03 46.9 37.8 45.0 40.4 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 9.5 0.7 15.0 38.5 56.4 38.5 59.9 78.8 E D E E 42.7 75.4 D E, 12.0 E Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 20: Plaza Blvd. & D Ave. 9/22/2010 4 , " EBB ES ii EBF , WBL YttBT : :'141BR'' NBL NBT: " NB♦ ` SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Iti fl $4, r ►j Volume (vph) 16 383 30 53 208 64 15 199 65 76 315, 10 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 1.00 0 85 1.00 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 3501 1770 3415 1770 1863 1583 1770 1854 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3501 1770 ! 3415 1770 1863 1583 1770 1854 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% Adj. Flow (vph) 30 720 56 100 391 120 28 374 122 143 592 19 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 5 0 0 23 0 0 0 22 0 1 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 771 0 100 488 0 28 374 100 143 610 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot ` Perm Prot Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 3.7 32.4 8.0 36.7 Effective Green, g (s) 3.7 34`4 8.0 38.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.35 0.08 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 4,0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 67 1228 144 1347 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.22 c0.06 0.14 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.45 0.63 Uniform Delay, di 46.2 26.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 1.7 2.4 Delay (s) 47.9 29.0 Level of Service D C Approach Delay (s) 29.7 Approach LOS C trttersection Sum 0.69 0.36 43.9 21.0 1.00 1.00 11.1 0.8 55.0 21.7 D C 27.2 G 3.7 3.7 0.04 4.0 1.5 67 0.02 26.7 28.7 0.29 6.0 2.5 545 0.20 8 26.7 28.7 0.29 6.0 2.5 463 11.0 11.0 0.11 4.0 1.5 198 c0.08 34.0 36.0 0.37 6.0 2.5 680 c0.33 0.06 0.42 0.22 0.72 0.90 46.1 26.2 42.1 29.3 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.5 0.2 10.5 14.4 47.7 26.4 52.5 43.7 DCCDD 45.4 D 0.69 30.7 1.00 3.3 34.0 32.9 G HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 34.1' 0.77 98.1 71.4% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 C Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 21: 8th St. & Highland Ave. 9/22/2010 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(pem3} Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph); Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v!s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 102 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 127% 141 0 141 Prot 7 c 4- k EST EBR ..WBL WBT R T 724 211 146 374 46 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 3419 1770 3481 1.00 0.95 1.00 3419 1770 3481 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 999 291 202 516 64 25 0 0 8 0 1265 0 202 Prot 572 3 8 13.3 35.0 11.0 13.3 35.0 11.0 0.12 0.32 0.10 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 214 1088 0.08 c0 37 0.66 1.16 46.2 37.5 1.00 1.00 7.1 83.7 53.3 121.2 D F 114.5 F TltrSeGitikiY� HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 83.9 1.13 110.0 101.2% 15 4.0 3.0 177 c0.11 32.7 32.7 0.30 4.0 3.0 1035 0.16 1.14 0.55 49.5 32.5 1.00 1.00 110.7 0.6 160.2 33.1 F; G 66.0 E HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 170 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 150% 277 0 277 Prot 5 15.0 15.0 0.14 4.0 3.0 241 c0.16 1T4 447 1900 4.0 0.95 0.97 1.00 3434 1.00 3434 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 729 181 20 0 890 0 34.0 34.0 0.31 4.0 3.0 1061 0.26 1.15 0.84 47.5 35,4 0.64 0.53 99.0 6.6 129.5 25.4 F C 49.7 D 16.0 G 111 127 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 0.92 150% 207 0 207 Prot 1 S1311 t4 637 65 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 0.99 1.00 3490 1.00 3490 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 1039 106 7 0 1138 0 14.0 33.0 14.0 33.0 0.13 0.30 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 225 1047 0.12 c0.33 0.92 47.4 1.00 38.7 86.1 F 1.09 38.5 1.00 54.5 93.0 F' 92.0 F Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 1: Plaza Blvd. & Highland Ave. 9/9/2010 4- Mover�;i,'ii,. 1 .- EBR W L` BR .` 1..= NBT' : NB SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tI+ ►t tt- jrt 'I 1 t l ) `Pi; Volume (vph) 32 113 23 72 284 110 49 517 58 37 349 41 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6 0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane UN. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3450 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3483 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1787 3450 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3483 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 173% 173% 173% 150% ' 150% 150% 150% ' 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% Adj. Flow (vph) 60 212 43 117 463 179 80 843 95 60 569 67 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 15 0 0 0 113 0 0 41 0 10 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 60 240 0 117 463 66 80 843 54 60 626 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 2°10 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Turn Type Prot Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 3 8 7 4 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 7.0 31.5 12.3 36.8 36.8 11.3 29.5 29.5 6,7! 24.9 Effective Green, g (s) 7.0 33.5 12.3 38.8 36.8 11.3 31.5 31.5 6.7 26.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0,07 0.34 0.12 0.39 0.37 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.07 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) : 2.0 3.0 2.0 ' 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 125 1156 218 1373 583 200 1115 499 119 937 vls Ratio Prot 0.03 0.07 c0.07 c0.13 0.05 c0.24 0.03 c0.18 vis Ratio Perm 0.04 0.03 vlc Ratio 0.48 0,21 0.54 0.34 0.11 0.40 0.76 0.11 0.50 0.67 Uniform Delay, d1 44.7 23.8 41.2 21.5 20.8 41.2 30.8 24.3 45.0 32.6 1.00 1:00 0.73 - 0.35 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.71 0.65 1.1 0.4 1.3 07 0.4 0.5 30 0.1 0.9 1.3 45.8 24.2 31.2 8.1 2.1 41.7 33.8 24.4 32.9 22.5 D C C A A D C C C C 28.3 10.3 33.5 23.4 C 8 C C Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tritT�rr�immary , HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 24.1 0.57 100.0 61.4% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 16.0 B Plaza Blvd 3125/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 2: Plaza Blvd. & L Ave. 9/9/2010 �R Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated glC Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot Ws Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, dt Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS r 11$ti;nriiatY. tt 23 263 18 32 > 410 19 22 12 13 25 30 26 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0,85' 1,00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1805 1583 1821 1583 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.74 1.00 0.83 1.00 1770 3539 1583 1770 ! 3539 1583 1384 1583 1541 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150% % 150% 150% 1509ii 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 38 429 29 52 668 31 36 20 21 41 49 42 0 0 9 0 0 11 0 0 18 0 0, 37 38 429 20 52 668 20 0 56 3 0 90 5 Prot Perm`, Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm 5 2 1 2 6 4 4 4 4 68.4 5.3 65.3 65.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 10.3 68,4 5.3 67.3 65.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 0.68 0.05 0.67 0.65 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 1083 94 2382 1034 170 195 190 195 8.4 8.4 0.08 4.0 0.5 149 c0.02 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 0.26 42.9 0.79 0.3 34.0 68.4 70.4 0.70 6.0 3.5 2491 0.12 0.17 5.0 0.63 0.1 3.3 A 5.5 c0.03 c0.19 0.01 0.02 0.55 0.28 5.1 46.2 6.6 0.37 1.12 0.53 0.0 3.9 0.3 1.9 55.6 3.8 A E A 7.3 A 11.6- 0.32 100.0= 43.7%u 15 0.01 0.04 0.00 c0.06 0.00 0 02 0.33 0.01 0.47 0.03 6.1 40.1 38.5 40.8 38.6 0.38 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.0 1.3 00 2.2 0.1 2.4 41.4 38.6 43.0 38.6 A D D D D 40.6 41.6 D D 11lil'lr:.: HCM Levelof Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 A Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 3: Plaza Blvd. & N Ave HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 9/9/2010 } Movet0ent °'R111Ir1 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 7 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 150% Adj. Flow (vph) 11 RTOR Reduction (vph), 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 11 Tum Type Prot Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.48 0.26 Uniform Delay, d1 49.0 18.3 Progression Factor 0.95 0.71 Incremental Delay, d2 5.6 0.4 Delay (s) 52.2 13.3 Level of Service D B Approach Delay (s) 13.5 Approach LOS la erseetion Suarnal r EB3 °.r, E81 1.3 0.01 4.0 1.9 23 0.01 WL ry 246 53 131 409 5 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4,0 4.0 6.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1.00 1.00 0.95 100 1.00 3539 1583 1770 3539 ' 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150% - 150% 401 86 214 667 8 0 49 0 0 2 401 37 214 667 6 Perm Prot Perm 1 41.1 43.1 0.43 6.0 2.2 1525 c0.11 B L NBT . NBR SBC"° 38 2 ` 71 12 5 7 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 2.0 2.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.96 0.95 1.00 0.98 1778 1583 1747 0.74 1.00 0.83 1377 1583 1482 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150%i. 62 3 116 20 0 0 100 0 0 65 16 0 Perm Perm Perm 6 8 8 41.1 33.2 73.0 73.0 11.7 11.7 43.1 33.2 75.0 73.0 13.7 13.7 0.43 0.33 0.75 0.73 0.14 0.14 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 2.2 1.8 2.2 2.2 1.9 1.9 682 588 2654 1156 189 217 c0.12 0.19 0.02 0.00 c0.05 0.01 0.05 0.36 0.25 0 01 0.34 0.07 16.6 25.4 3.9 3.7 39.1 37.6 0.57 0.34 0.28 0 31 1.00 1.00 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0,4 0.1 9.6 8.7 1.3 1.1 39.5 37.7 A A A A D D 3.1 38.3 A „D HCM Average Control Delay 11.2 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.31 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 100.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.3% Analysis Period (min) ' 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 10.0 A 150% 8 10 29 9.7 11.7 0.12 6.0 1.9 173 0.02 0.17 39.8 1.00 0.2? 39.9 D 39.9 D 0.92 150% 11 0 0 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4: Plaza Blvd. & Palm Ave. 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 9/9/2010 nt �I tLu�if'� C '- ti 4\ t NBT %Fr, 1 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (pro() Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 4.5 25.0 25.0 Effective Green, g (s) 4.5 27.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.04 0.27 0.25 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.5 2.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 80 956 396 v/s Ratio Prot 0.02 c0.10 v/s Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.41 0.36 Uniform Delay, di 46.5 29.5 Progression Factor 0.87 0.74 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 1,0 Delay (s) 41.6 22.9 Level of Service D C Approach Delay (s) 24.5 Approach LOS C rs Summary HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group tt 20 210 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 3539 0.95 1.00 1770 3539 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 33 342 0 0 33 342 Prot 5 13 1900 6.0 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 150% 21 16 5 Perm tt 87 486 98 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 6.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 0.95 1.00 1.00 1770 3539 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 120 671 135 0 0 90 120 671 45 Prot Perm 1 12.7 12.7 0.13 4.0 2.0 225 0.07 33.2 35.2 0.35 6.0 2.5 1246 c0.19 33.2 33.2 0.33 6.0 2.5 526 0.00 0.03 0.01 0.53 0.54 0.09 28.2 40.9 25.9 23.0 0.80 0.63 0.52 0.16 0.1 1.2 16 0.3 22.6 27.0 15 1 4.1 C C B A 15.0 a 28.6 HCM Level of Service 0.67 100.0Sum of lost time (s) 67.3% ICU Level of Service 15 31 144 98 131 140 17 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 1750 1770 1832 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 1750 1770 1832 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 51 235 160 214 228 28 0 25 0 0 5 0 51 370 0 214 251 0 Split Split' 8 8 4 23.2 25.2 0.25 6.0 2.3 446 0.03 0.11 28.8 1.00 0.1 28 9 C 23.2 25.2 0.25 6.0 2.3 441 c0.21 0.84 35.5 1.00 12.7 48.2 D 46.0 D 16.0 C 17.1 17.1 19.1 19.1 0.19 0.19 6.0 6.0 2.3 2.3 338 350 0.12 c0.14 0.63 37.2 1.00 3.2 40.4 D 0.72 37.9 1.00 6.2 44.1 D, 42.4 D; Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vie Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Intersecttori Surt)Otf y' . HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 5: Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 SB J EBL event :' 9/9/2010 EBT EBR WBL 1- 4y,x =WBR 4\ Lane Configurations tat if Volume (vph) 0 290 269 393 624 0 0 0 0 365 1 214 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 0.95 1.00 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 ` 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prat) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1686 1583 Flt Permitted 1.00 1.00 0 95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 Satd, Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 1681 1686 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 10{1°f° 127% 127% 127% 127% 100% 100% 100% 100% 127% 127% 127% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 400 371 543 861 0 0 0 0 504 1 295 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 400 371 543 861 0 0 0 0 252 253 295 Free Prot Split Free 1 6 4 Free 46.9 100.0 20.1 47.5 100.0 20.3 0.48 1.00 0.20 4.6 4.2 4.5 2.0 1681 1583 697 0.11 c0.16 0.23 0.24 0.23 0.78 0.34 15.5 0.0 377 5.3 0.70 1.00 0.83 0.51 0.3 0.3 4.7 0.3 11.1 0.3 36.1 3.0 B A D A 5.9 15.8 A 8 ofr 1;01;rilllli(11', +1" 16.6 0.52 100.0 56.5% 15 71.2 71.8 0.72 4.6 4.5 2541 c0.24 HCM Level of Service Sum of ti(s) ICU Levellost of Servmeice 0.0 A 8.0 B 19.6 20.2 0 20 4.6 2.0 340 0.15 Free 19.6 100.0 20.2 100.0 0.20 1.00 4.6 2.0 341 1583 c0.15 0.19 0.74 0 74 0.19 37.4 37.5 0.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 7.4 7.4 0.3 44.9 44.9 0.3 D D A 28.4 C` Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 6: Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 NB 9/9/2010 of Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) To Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prat) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) } _. 4- ttV °S 1` TT 157 538 0 0 _ 628 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 3433 3539 3539 0.95 1.00 1.00 3433 3539 3539 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% Adj. Flow (vph) 217 RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) 217 Tum Type Prot Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 743 0 0 0 0 0 0 743 0 0 10.7 71.4 10.9 72.0 0.11 0.72 4.2 4.6 2.0 4.5 374 2548 0.06 0.21 0.58 42.4 0.97 42.8 D 0.29 5.0 0.27 0.3 1.6 A 10.9 B 11.1 0.59 100.0 56.5% 15 NBT ER' , . 5BL 634 365 0 564 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1583 3433 1583 1.00 0.95 1.00 1583 3433 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 100% 100% 127% 127% 127% 100% 127% 100% 100% 100% 867 875 504 0 779 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 867 875 504 0 779 0 0 0 Free Prot Free 4 Free 56.5 100.0 19.4 57.1 100.0 20.0 0.57 1.00 0.20 4.6 4,6 4.5 2.0 Free 100.0 100.0 1.00 2021 1583 687 1583 0.24 0.43 12.2 1.03 0.4 13.0 B 6.9 A c0.55 0.55 0.0 1.00 0.9 0.9 A HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service c0 15 0.73 37.5 1.00 3,5 41.0 D 16.8 B 049 0.49 0.0 1.00 1.1 1.1 A 4,0 B 0.0 A Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 7: Plaza Blvd. & Grove St. 9/9/2010 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (peon) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) Ws Ratio Prot viS Ratio Perm TIF r 31 821 200 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 3539 1583 1770 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 3539 1583 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 43 1133 276 30 0 0 64 0 43 1133 212 30 Prot Perm Prot 5 2 1 2 4.9 41.8 41.8 4.3 4.9 43.8 43.8 4.3 0.05 0.44 0.44 0.04 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 2.8 2.8 2.0 87 1550 693 76 c0.02 0.32 0.02 31 Wt WBW1 NB,NBR v/c Ratio 0.49 0.73 Uniform Delay, di 46.3 23.2 Progression Factor 1 04 0.62 Incremental Delay, d2 1.5 2.9 Delay (s) 49 8 17.3 Level of Service D B Approach Delay (s) 16.8 Approach LOS 1t 22 835 1900 1900 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 3539 1.00 3539 0.92 127% 1153 0 1153 3 330 1900 1900 4.5 1.00 0.85 1.00 1583 1.00 1583 0.92 092 127% 127% 4 456 2 0 2 0 Perm Perm 6 6 6 4 42.7 42.7 43.2 42.7 0.43 0.43 4,5 4.5 2.8 2.8 1529 676 c0.33 0.13 0.00 0 31 0.39 0.75 0.00 18.2 46.6 23.9 16.4 0.47 1.07 1.00 1.37 1.1 0.8 2.4 0.0 9 7 50.6 26.3 22.6 A DC C 26.9 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 26.3 HCM Level of Service 0.83 Actuated Cycle Length (s) ' 100.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 70.1% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 4 r 4+ 13 25 2 19 53 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 1.00 1777 1583 1680 0.67 1.00 0.99 1252 1583 1665 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 18 35 3 26 73 0 9 0 44 0 474 26 0 58 0 Perm Perm 4 4 8 37.9 37.9 39.9 39.9 0.40 0.40 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 500 632 8 37.9 39.9 0.40 6.0 2.0 664 c0.38 0.02 0.03 0.95 0.04 0.09 29.0 18.4 18.7 1.00 1.00 1.00 27.1 0.0 0.0 56 2 18.4 18.7 E B B 53.6 18.7 D 12.0 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 8: Plaza Blvd. & Euclid Ave. 9/9/2010 I Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (Prot) Flt Permitted Said, Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) 17.8 Effective Green, g (s) 17.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 611 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 v/s Ratio Pemi v/c Ratio 0.69 Uniform Delay, di 38.5 Progression Factor 0.42 Incremental Delay, d2 2.0 Delay (s) 18.1 Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS /1 114 41* 307 403 59 60 601 57 127 441 68 66 238 179 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4,0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.94 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 3433 3539 1583 1770 3493 1770 3468 1770 3312 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 3433 3539 1583 1770 3493 1770 3468 1770 3312 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127/0 127% ' 128% 128% 128% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 424 556 81 83 836 79 175 609 94 91 329 247 0 0 45 0 7 0 0 12 0: 0 138 0 424 556 36 83 908 0 175 691 0 91 438 0 Prot Perm Prot Prot Prot 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 2 42.4 42.4 7.3 31.9 12.9 22.9 7.4 18.4 44.4 44.4 7.3 33.9 12.9 24.9 . 7.4 20.4 0.44 0.44 0.07 0.34 0.13 0.25 0.07 0.20 6.0 6.0 -4.0 6.0 3.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 2.4 2.4 2.0 2.4 1.9 2.0 1.9 2.0 1571 703 129 1184 - 228 864 131 676 0.16 0.05 c0.26 c0.10 c0.20 0.05 0.13 0.02 0.35 0.05 0.64 0.77 0.77 0.80 18.3 15.8 45.1 29.5 - 42.1 35.2 0.21 0.08 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.5 0.1 8.0 4.8 13.0 - 4.9 4.3 1.4 53.0 34.3 55.1 40.1 A A D C E D 9.6 35.9 43.1 A 0.69 45.2 1.00 12.1 57.3 E 0.65 36.5 1.00 1.6 38.1 D 40.7 D HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group ,30.8 0.75 100.0 72.6% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 11 0 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM21 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 20: Plaza Blvd. & D Ave. 9/9/2010 f 1 EBL EBT EB;i . W. -WBT 4\ Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow(perm) Peak -hour factor. PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Prot Ws Ratio Perm vie Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Inters p 0trirri"6t ry'tI,i" f 6 106 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.98 0.95 1.00 1770 3484 0.95 1.00 1770 3484 0.92 0.92 0.92 173% 173% 173%, 11 199 23 0 8 0 11 214 Prot 5 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 1.0 28.9 1.0 30.9 0.01 0.36 4.0 6.0 1.5 2.5 20 1245 0.01 0.06 fi t r 12 30 263 42 18 269 76 36 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.98 ` 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 3466 1770 1863 1583 1770 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 3466 1770 1863 1583 1770 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 56 495 79 34 506 143 68 0 11 0 0 0 19 0 56 563 0 34 506 124 68 Prot Prot Perm Prot 1 6 3 8 7 8 5.5 33.4 3.7 26.1 26.1 6.0 5.5 35.4 3.7 28.1 28.1 6.0 0.06 0.41 0.04 0.32 0.32 0.07 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 1.5 2.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.5 113 1418 76 605 514 123 c0.03 c0.16 0.02 c0.27 c0.04 0.08 0.55 0.17 0.50 0.40 0.45 0.84 0.24 0.55 0.60 42.5 19.0 39.2 ` 18.0 40.4 27.1 21.4 39.0 23.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 17.2 0.3 1.2 0.8 1.5 9.6 0.2 3.0 1.2 59.8 19.3 40.4 18.9 41.9 36.7 21.6 42.0 24.2 E B D B DOC DC 21.2 20.8 33.8 26.9 C C C C 26.7 0.57 86.5 61.3% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 12.0 B 197 10 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 0.99 1.00 1849 1.00 1849 0.92 0.92 173% 173% 370 19 2 0 387 0 28.4 30.4 0.35 6.0 2.5 650 0.21 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 9 4.8 14.3 4.8 14.3 0.05 0.14 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 85 491 0.04 c0.09 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2030_Opt_AM_4 Ln plus Transit -only Ln 21: 8th St. & Highland Ave. E eT 9/9/2010 k 4\ t \* 1 -' Ik 1l6fa .: t413 `1OittrfiBR . SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 46 195 48 119 1015 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow {prat) 1770 3435 1770 3517 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3435 1770 3517 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 150% Adj. Flow (vph) 64 269 66 164 1401 62 362 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 26 0 0 3 0 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 64 309 0 164 1460 0 362 Turn Type Prot Prot Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vls Ratio Prot vrs Ratio Perm We Ratio 0.75 0.63 0.29 1.01 Uniform Delay, di 47.0 40.4 25.9 29.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 30.8 2.5 0.3 26.8 Delay (s) 77.8 42.9 26.2 56.3 Level of Service E D C E Approach Delay (s) 48.5 53.3 Approach LOS D D 31.5 41.0 31.5 41.0 0.32 0.41 4.0 '+ 4.0 3.0 3.0 558 1442 0.09 c0.42 4.8 4.8 0.05 4.0 3.0 85 0.04 0.82 47.2 1.00 44.9 92.1 F 45 222 1900 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 18.0 18.0 0.18 4.0 3.0 319 c0.20 1.13 41.0 0.70 902 118.7 33.4 33.4_ 0.33 4.0 3.0 1169 c0.33 0.98 32.9 0.91 20.7 50.7 F D 67.0 E fit fi* 653 52 43 343 49 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.95 1.00 3500 1770 3473 1.00 0.95 1.00 3500 1770 3473 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 1065 85 70 559 80 6 0 0 11 0 1144 0 70 628 0 20.2 20.2 0.20 4.0 3.0 702 0.18 0.89 38.9 1.00 16.2 55.1 E 58.7 E' HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 58.6 1.00 100.0 89.1% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 ICU Level of Service E Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt AM Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Plaza Blvd. & Highland Ave. 9/22/2010 6Venl Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow(prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) f 112 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0.95 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 173% Adj. Flow (vph) 211 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 211 Turn TypeProt Protected Phases 3 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Perm vic Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Increments Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS 21.0 31.6 21.0 33.6 0.19 0.31 4.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 338 1052 0.12 c0.27 0.62 40.9 1.00 2.6 43.5 D 4- WET " WETt " NBL " " NBT NBR SBI " SETT ""SET1 '406 90 204 233 146 69 459 153 256! 582 41 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0', 4.0 0.95 1.00 0 95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 ` 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3443 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3504 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3443 1770 ' 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 3504 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 173% 173% 120% 120% 120% 115% 115% 115% 115% 115% r 115% 763 169 266 304 190 86 574 191 320 728 51 17 0 0 0 140 0 0 104 0 5 0 915 0 266 304 50 86 574 87 320 774 0 Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot 7 4 5 2 1 4 2 18.2 28.8 28.8 7.5 18.9 18.9 18.2 30.8 28.8 7.5 20.9 20.9 0.17 0.28 0.26 0.07 0.19 0.19 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 293 991 414 121 672 301 c0.15 0.09 0.05 c0.16 0.03 0.06 0.12 0.71 0.85 0.29 30.9 50.2 43,1 38.2 3.61 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.5 15.1 10.3 0.5 112.2 65.3 53.4 38.7 F E D D 0.87 0.91 0.31 36.1 45.1 31.2 1.00 1.02 1.21 9.8 26.6 0.7 45.9 72.5 38.5 D E D? 45.4 68.8 D E rY 1� HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 47.4 0.89 110.0 82.2% HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 51.3 D 16.0 E 21.3 21.3 0.19 4.0, 2.0 343 c0.18 0.93 43.6 1.33 4.9 63.0 E 32.7 34.7 0.32 6.0 3.0 1105 0.22 0.70 33.1 0.56 0.2 18.6 B' 31.5 C Plaza Blvd 3/2512007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2. Plaza Blvd. & L Ave. 9/22/2010 f c 4-- 4\ t I, 41 Movement rir''' 7 „ARA ,,:-Ettc::::Em::::: EBR WBL WBT WBR - NBLiii," i NBT:ijiii:- ,. „BIL,-1,44,,, ' -fii VOA Lane Configurations 1 ++ r ) ++ r 4 r 4 r Volume (vph) 85 734 67 103 597 41 37 44 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 Lane Uhl. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.98 1.00 Satd Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1821 1583 1830 1583 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 0.75 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1016 1583 1402 1583 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factorvph) 150% 150% 150% 150G/0 150% 150% 150% 150% 150°70 150% 150% 100% Adj Flow (vph) 139 1197 109 168 973 67 60 72 150 88 157 70 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 43 0 0 33 0 0 117 0 0 37 Lana Group Flow (vph) 139 1197 66 168 973 34 0 132 33 0 245 33 To+ n Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 4 4 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.0 58.6 58.6 13.1 55.7 55.7 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3 Effective Green, g (s) 16.0 60.6 58.6 13,1 57.7 55.7 24.3 24.3 24.3 24.3 Actuated gIC Ratio 0.15 0.55 0.53 0.12 0.52 0.51 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6,0 6.0 6.0 6,0 Vehicle Extension (s) 0.5 3.5 3.5 0.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 3.5 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 257 1950 843 211 1856 802 224 350 310 350 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.34 c0.09 0.27 Ws Ratio Perm 0.04 0.02 0.13 0,02 00.17 0.02 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.61 0.08 0.80 0.52 0.04 0.59 0.09 0.79 0.09 Uniform Delay, di 43.6 16.8 12.5 47.2 17.1 13.7 38.4 34.1 40.4 34.1 Progression Factor 0.71 0.42 0.12 1.41 0.27 0.04 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 0.9 1.0 0.1 15.6 0.9 0.1 4.2 0.1 13.2 0.1 Delay (s) 31.9 8.0 1.6 81.9 5.7 0.7 42 6 34.2 53.6 34.2 Level of Service C A A F A A DC DC Approach Delay (s) 9.8 16.0 38 1 49.3 Approach LOS A B D D lntersention..,511*-4.9105Witiiijixi HCM Average Control Delay 18.4 HCM Level of Service B HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0 68 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.7% ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 92 54 96 64 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 0pt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 3: Plaza Blvd. & N Ave. 9/22/2010 Ir e� �ppi n iir a m �. 4� `vr Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 36 736 124 246 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 3539 1583< 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 150% 150%0 150% 150% Adj. Flow (vph) 59 1200 202 401 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 86 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 1200 116 401 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Protected Phases 5 2 1 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green. G (s) 8.0 48.3 48.3 27.4 67.7 67.7 Effective Green, g (s) 8.0 50.3 50.3 27.4 69.7 '` 67.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.07 0.46 0.46 0.25 0.63 0.62 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 1.9 2.2 2.2 1.8 2.2 2.2 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 129 1618 724 441 2242 974 v/s Ratio Prot 0.03 c0.34 c0.23 0.30 v/s Ratio Perm 0.07 0.00 v/c Ratio 0.46 0.74 0.16 0.91 0.47 0.00 Uniform Delay, dt 48.9 24.5 17.5 40.1 ` 10.6 8.2 Progression Factor 0.71 0.53 0.16 0.75 1.39 0.82 Incremental Delay, d2 0.8 2.6 0.4 20.4 0.7 0.0 Delay (s) 35.3 15.6 3.1 50.3 15.4 6.7 Level of Service D B A D B A Approach Delay (s) 14.7 24.8 Approach LOS B C t� T 1' d HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min)` c Critical Lane Group 25.5 0.81 110.0 76.2%0 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 652 4 88 5 289 67 13 22 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.97 3539 1583 1779 1583 1751 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 0.56 3539 1583 1204 1583 1021 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 150% '150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 1063 7 143 8 471 109 21 36 0 3 0 0 384 0 9 0 1063 4 0 151 87 0 157 Perm Perm Perm Perm 18.3 20.3 0.18 6.0 1.9 222 8 4 18.3 20.3 0.18 60 1.9 292 0.13 0.05 0.68 0.30 41.8 38.7 1.00 1.00 6.7 0.2 48.5 38.9 D D 41.2 D 12.0 D 18.3 20.3 0.18 6.0 1.9 188 c0.15 0.84 43.2 1.00 25.2 68.4 E 68.4 E Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 4. Plaza Blvd. & Palm Ave. 9/22/2010 L 1,4/00,40,;;;NBL' V11401$11414MP' Lane Configurations ++ r tt r T. Volume (vph) 111 1026 17 170 724 149 35 124 74 219 198 78 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Fri 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.94 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1759 1770 1784 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flovv (perm) 1770 3539 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1759 1770 1784 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0 92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 115% 115% 115% 115% 115% 115% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% 110% Adj. Flow (vph) 139 1282 21 212 905 186 42 148 88 262 237 93 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 9 0 0 109 0 19 0 0 13 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 139 1282 12 212 905 77 42 217 0 262 317 0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Split Split Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.5 42.0 42.0 14.0 43.5 43.5 12.4 12.4 Effective Green, g (s) 12,5 44.0 42.0 14.0 45.5 43.5 14.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.40 0.38 0.13 0.41 0.40 0.13 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.5 2.5 2.3 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 201 1416 604 225 1464 626 232 v/s Ratio Prot 0.08 c0.36 c0.12 0.26 0.02 v/s Ratio Perm 0.01 0.05 v/c Ratio 0.69 0.91 0.02 0.94 0.62 0.12 0.18 0.94 0.75 0.91 Uniform Delay di 46.9 31.0 21.2 47.6 25.4 21.1 42.6 47.4 41.7 43.2 Progression Factor 1.06 0.54 0.29 0.76 0.59 0.29 1.00 1.00 1 00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 5 5 7.0 0.0 40.8 1.8 0.4 0.2 43.3 8.3 25.7 Delay (s) 55.3 23.9 6.2 77.2 16.7 6.6 42.8 90.7 50 0 68.9 Level of Service EC A E B A D F D E Approach Delay (s) 26 7 25.1 83.5 60.5 Approach LOS I-1CM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization 82 3°/v ICU Level of Service Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 19.6 19.6 14.4 21.6 21.6 0.13 0.20 0.20 6.0 6.0 6.0 2.3 2.3 2.3 230 348 350 c0.12 0.15 c0.18 36.0 HCM Level of Service D 16.0 E Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 4 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 5: Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 SB 9/22/2010 moverrr _ E€ i1 16 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 0 ' 887 528 490 , 804 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 Frt 1.00 0.85 1.00: 1,00 Fit Protected 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3539 1583 3433 3539 Fit Permitted 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3539 1583 3433 3539 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) ± 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% -100%0 100% 100% 100% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green. G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated gIC Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot Ws Ratio Perm v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group r 1224 729 676 1110 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1224 729 676 1110 0 Free Prot 1 Free 36.9 110.0 24.4 37.5 110.0 24,6 0.34 1.00 0.22 4.6 4.2 4.5 2.0 1206 1583 768 c0.35 c0.20 0.46 1.01 0.46 0.88 36.3 0.0, 41.3 0.58 1.00 1.56 248 0.6 8,2 45.7 0.6 72.5 D A E 28.9 G err 33.5 0.93 110.0 101.8% 15 6 65.5 66,1 0.60 4.6 4.5 2127 0.31 0.52 12.8 1.55 0.7 20.5 C 40.2 D HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 0.0 A C 12,0 G 813yer: SB'F �it� 4 R i" 0 687 10' 389 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 0.95 1.00 1681 1688 1583 0.95 0.95 1.00 1681 1688 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% ' 127% 948 14 537 0 0 0 483 479 537 Split Free 4 4 35.3 35,9 0.33 4.6 2.0 549 c0.29 0.88 35.0 1.00 14.5 49.5 35.3 35.9 0.33 4.6 2.0 551 0.28 Free 110.0 110,0 1.00 1583 0.34 087 034 34.8 0.0 1.00 1.00 13.3 0.6 48.1 0.6 D A 31.5 C Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 5 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 6. Plaza Blvd. & 1-805 NB 9/22/2010 Movemer �t 1 4 t 4\ EBR" tB1T`i` Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Row (perm), Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph)` Lane Group Flow (vph) Tum Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot vts Ratio Perm v,rc Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS fr)te�sot�iirran, HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Lengths) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 301 1270 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3433 3539 0.95 1.00 3433 3539 ft 0- 0 870 441 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 ' 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 1.00 1.00 3539 1583 481 0 648 0 0 0 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.85 0.95 1.00 3433 1583 0.95 1.00 3433 1583 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 100% 100% 127% 127% 127% 100% 127% 100% 100% 100% 416 1753 0 0 1201 609 664 0 895 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 416 1753 0 0 1201 609 664 0 895 0 0 0 Prot 5 17.7 74.6 17.9 75.2 0.16 0.68 4.2 4,6 2.0 4.5 559 2419 0.12 c0.50 0.74 0.72 43.9 10.9 1.16 1.55 0.4 0.9 51.5 17.8 D B 24.2 C 18.6 0.74 110.0. 101.8% 15`. Free Prot Free 4 Free 52.7 110.0 26.2 53.3 110.0 26.8 0.48 1.00 0.24 4.6 4.6 4.5 2.0 1715 1583 836 0.34 c0.19 0.38 0.70 0.38 0.79 22.1 0.0 39.0 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.4 0.4 4.9 16.3 0.4 43.9 B A D 11.0 19.5 B B HGM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service Free 110.0 1100 1.00 1583 0.57 0.57 00 1.00 1.5 1.5 A B 80 G 0.0 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 6 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 7: Plaza Blvd. & Grove St. 9/22/2010 o /ei}1 tiffs.{Jr ire .. EB . EBT" ....EBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 41 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% Adj. Flow (vph) 57 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 57 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot Ws Ratio Perm v/c Ratio 0.53 Uniform Delay, di 50.1 Progression Factor 1.24 Incremental Delay, d2 1.6 Delay (s) 63.8 Level of Service E Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS tr tet et 'Sumri HCM Average Control Delay 46.7 HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 1.05 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.5% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group 6.7 53.0 6.7 55.0 0.06 0.50 4.0 6.0 2.0 2.8 108 1770 0.03 c0.53 1.06 27.5 0.87 37,3 61.1 E 50.9 D wrr 1361 451 67 ! 955 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 1770 3539 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 3539 1583 1770 3539 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 1879 623 92 1318 0 85 0 0 1879 538 92 1318 Perm Prot 1 6 2 6 6 53.0 8.0 54.3 54.3 55.0 8.0 56.3 54.3 0.50 0.07 0.51 0.49 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 2.8 2.0 2.8 2.8 792 129 1811 781 0.05 c0.37 0.34 0.00 0.68 0.71 0.73 0.00 20.8 49,9 ! 20.9 - 14.1 0.73 0.72 0.52 0.79 3,5 6.6 : 1.2 0.0 18.8 42.6 12.0 11.1 B ❑ E B 14.0 R" NB L ;.,.,NBT la'4 1111;i i.is 813 4, 2 298 21 51 12 23 47 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 6.0 4.0 > 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.85 0.92 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.99 1583 1780 1583 1707 1.00 0.64 1.00 0.78 1583 < 1191 1583 1337 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 3 411 29 70 17 32 65 1 0 0 18 0 44 0 2 0 440 52 0 70 0 Perm Perm Perm Perm 4 8 33.0 33.0 33.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.32 0.32 0.32 6.0 6.0 6.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 379 504 425 c0.37 0.03 0,05 1.16 0.10 0.17 37.5 26.4 27.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 97.8 0.0 0.1 135.3 26.5 27.1 F C C' 120.4 27.1 B F C M Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 8.0 F Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 7 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 8: Plaza Blvd. & Euclid Ave. 9/22/2010 r k 4\ t �" V Movement EBL -r EBT EBR° . WOL'1 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 283 990 120 92 670 79 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.98 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 3539 1583 1770 3483 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 3539 1583 1770 3483 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 127% Adj. Flow (vph) 391 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 391 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance lime (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) v/s Ratio Prot v/s Ratio Penn v/c Ratio Uniform Delay, d1 Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS ecttn u Itrt, iiitlzrtiticiirl 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127%a 127% 128% 128% ' 128% 1367 166 128 932 110 0 67 0 8 0 1367 99 128 1034 0 Perm Prot 2 1 6 15.0 42.3 15.0 44.3 0.14 0.40 4.0 6.0 2.0 2.4 468 1425 0.11 c0.39 0.84 46.3 0.48 1.2 23.5 C 0.96 32.0 0.25 2.4 10.4 B 12.3 B 2 42.3 9.7 37.0 44.3 9.7 39.0 0.40 0.09 0.35 6.0 4.0 6.0 2.4 2.0 2.4 638 156 1235 0.07 c0.30 0.06 0.15 0.82 0.84 20.9 49.3 " 32.6 0.07 1.00 1.00 0.0 26.8 6.8 1.4 76.1 39.4 A E D 43.4 D HCM Average Control Delay 39.2 HCM Level of Service HCM Volume to Capacity ratio 0.95 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 12.0 4, WBR tat a -,-NB r i+etr"fiB1?�....,;:: B +To fi.1* 106 256 95 159 453 266 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.94 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 3396 1770 3343 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 3396 1770 3343 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 127% 146 353 131 219 625 367 0 34 0 0 78 0 219 914 Prot: 8 7 146 450 0 Prot 3 10.0 10.0 0.09 4.0 1.9 161 0.08 0.91 49.5 1.00 43.7 93.2 F 22.7 24.7 0.22 6.0 2.0 763 0.13 15.3 28.0 15.3 30.0 0.14 0.27 4.0 6.0 1.9 2.0 246 912 c0.12 c0.27 0.59 0.89 1.00 38.1 46.540.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.8 29.7 30.4 38.9 76.2 70.4 D E E 51.5 71.4 D EI Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.8% Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group ICU Level of Service E it Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 8 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 20: Plaza Blvd. & D Ave. 9/22/2010 MOYeme[i� _: Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 Frt 1.00 Flt Protected 0.95 Satd. Flow(prot) 1770 Flt Permitted 0.95 Satd. Flow(perm) 1770 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 Growth Factor (vph) 173% Adj. Flow (vph) 30 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 30 Turn Type Prot Protected Phases 5 Permitted Phases Actuated Green, G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated g/C Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Gap (vph) vis Ratio Prot vns Ratio Perm vlc Ratio Uniform Delay, di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Approach Delay (s) Approach LOS Ir(tersecti90-. nI3"1? 3.7 3.7 0.04 4.0 1.5 67 0.02 0.45 46.2 1.00 1.7 47.9 D { 4- k tt+ t 383 30 53 208 64 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4,0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.99 1.00 0.96 1.00 0.95 1.00 3501 1770 3415 1.00 0.95 1.00 3501 1770 3415 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 720 56 100 391 120 5 0 0 23 0 771 0 100 488 0 Prot 1 32.4 34.4 0.35 6.0 2.5 1228 c0.22 0.63 26.5 1.00 2.4 8.0 8,0 0.08 4.0 1.5 144 c0.06 0.69 43.9 1.00 11.1 29.0 55.0 C D 29.7 C 36.7 38.7 0 39 6.0 2.5 1347 0.14 0.36 21.0 1.00 0.8 21.7 C 27.2 C T `NBR s S0-1lliitiiil $O 15 1 9 1900 1900 4,0 4,0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1770 1863 0.95 1.00 1770 1863 0.92 0.92 65 76 315 10 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1583 1770 1854 1.00 0.95 1.00 1583 1770 1854 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 173% 28 374 122 143 592 19 0 0 22 0 1 0 28 374 100 143 610 0 Prot Perm Prot 3 8 7 4 3.7 3,7 0.04 4.0 1.5 67 0.02 0.42 46.1 1.00 1.5 47.7 D 26.7 28.7 0.29 6.0 2.5 545 0 20 0.69 30.7 1.00 34.0 32.9 8 26.7 28.7 0.29 6.0 2.5 463 0.06 0.22 26.2 1.00 0.2 26.4 c 11.0 11.0 0.11 4.0 1.5 198 c0.08 34.0 36.0 0.37 6.0 2.5 680 c0.33 0.72 0.90 42.1 29.3, 1.00 1.00 10.5 14.4 52.5 43.7 D D 45.4 HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group 34.1 0.77 98.1 71.4% 15 HCM Level of Service Sum of Cost time (s) ICU Level of Service C 16.0 C Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 9 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 21: 8th St. & Highland Ave. 9/22/2010 Movement, trlr Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Total Lost time (s) Lane Util. Factor Fri Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Peak -hour factor, PHF Growth Factor (vph) Adj. Flow (vph) RTOR Reduction (vph) Lane Group Flow (vph) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Actuated Green. G (s) Effective Green, g (s) Actuated giC Ratio Clearance Time (s) Vehicle Extension (s) Lane Grp Cap (vph) vis Ratio Prot vis Ratio Perm vic Ratio Uniform Delay. di Progression Factor Incremental Delay, d2 Delay (s) Level of Service Appro oli Delay (s) Approi.=ch LOS Intersection Sur HCM Average Control Delay HCM Volume to Capacity ratio Actuated Cycle Length (s) Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis Period (min) c Critical Lane Group t 102 1900 4.0 1.00 1.00 0.95 1770 0 95 1770 0.92 127% 141 0 141 Prot 7 13.3 13,3 0.12 4.0 3.0 214 0.08 0.66 46.2 1.00 7.1 53.3 D 4- k 4\ t t y 1 4/ 'Attjt EB 2 FIA-371SIBIL` NBi B '. -tEIR ft+ tT t 724 211 146 374 46 170 ` 447 111 127 637 65 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.97 1.00 0.98 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.99 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 3419 1770 3481 1770 3434 1770 3490 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 3419 1770 3481 1770 3434 1770 3490 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 127% 127% 127% i 127% 127% .150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 150% 999 291 202 516 64 277 729 181 207 1039 106 25 0 0 8 0 0 20 0 0 7 0 1265 0 202 572 0 277 890 0 207 1138 0 Prot ` Prot Prot 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 35.0 35.0 0.32 4.0 3.0 1088 c0.37 1.16 37.5 1.00 83.7 121.2 F 114.5 F 83.6 1.13 110.0 101.2% 15 11.0 11.0 0.10 4.0 3.0 177 c0.11 32.7 32.7 0.30 4.0 3.0 1035 0.16 1.14 0.55 49.5 32.5 1.00 1.00 110.7 0.6 160.2 33.1 F C 66.0 E HCM Level of Service Sum of lost time (s) ICU Level of Service 15.0 34.0 15.0 34.0 0.14 0.31 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 241 1061 c0.16 0.26 1.15 0.84 47.5 35.4 0.61 0.50 988s 14.0 33.0 14.0 33.0 0.13 0.30 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0 225 1047 0.12 c0.33 0.92 1.09 47.4 38.5 1.00 1.00 6.5 38.7 54.5 27.9 24.1 86.1 93.0 F C F F 48.3 92.0 D F 16.0 G 1900 Plaza Blvd 3/25/2007 2030 Opt PM Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 APPENDIX C: TRIP GENERATION REPORTS CVSR(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and :and use by zone Page 1 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amcunt Person Vehicle 3946 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre C.4 0. 0. 3946 TOTAL 0. 0. 3990 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 176.0 2746. 1916. 3990 4112 RIGHT -OF -MAY acre 9.8 0. 0. 3990 TOTAL 2746. 1916. 3992 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 205.0 3120. 2177. 3992 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.7 0. 0. 3992 TOTAL 3120. 2177. 4001 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 229.0 3572. 2493. 4000 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.8 0. 0. 4001 9101 INACTIVE USE acre C.4 0. 0. 4001 TOTAL 3572. 2493. 4002 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 47.0 /33. 512. 4002 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 76.0 585. 411. 4002 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.2 0. 0. 4002 5027 NC i4U RETAIL acre 37.7 5634. 4090. 4002 6012 NC MO OFFICE acre 22.7 539. 413. 4002 TOTAL 7491. 5426. 4006 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 290.0 4524. 3157. 4006 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 22.2 0. 0. 4006 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 2.0 8. 6. 4006 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4006 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 2.4 0. 0. 4006 TOTAL 6651. 4348. 4015 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 76.0 1186. 827. 4015 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 10.4 0. 0. 4015 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 0.6 2. 2. 4015 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4015 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 23.4 1556. 1024. 4015 8002 INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE acre 1.5 1. 1. 4015 TOTAL 4863. 3039. 4017 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 100.0 1560.1089. 4017 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 288.0 3082. 2163. 4017 103 MORTT,F HOMR PARK du 87.0 574. 381. 4017 162 NC MU MULTT-FAMILY du 79.0 608. 427. 4017 41.12 RTGHT-OF-WAY acre 12.1 0. 0. 4017 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 47.6 7124. 5_72. 4017 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 28.6 682. 523. 4017 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.6 0. 0. 4017 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 2.5 2468. 1792. 4017 TOTAL 16097. 11546. 4027 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 64.0 998. 697. 4027 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY d❑ 158.0 1217. 854. 4027 4112 RIGHT CF WAY acre 11.2 0. 0. 23jun10/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 2 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4021 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 81.4 12180. 8842. 4027 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 49.0 1166. 894. 4027 6102 CHURCH acre 2.2 115. 88. 4027 6502 HOSPITAL acre 10.7 3616. 2660. 4027 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 1.4 671. 498. 4027 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 4.4 883. 728. 4027 7607 RESIDENTIAL RECREATION acre 0.8 0. 0. 4027 9700 MIXED USE 75% S1'REETFRON'T acre 1.0 983. 714. 4021 TOTAL 21829. 15975. 4029 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 7.0 54. 38. 4029 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 16.6 0. 0. 4029 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 4.5 676. 491. 4029 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 2.7 65. 50. 4029 6102 CHURCH acre 1.4 74. 57. 4029 6701 MILITARY USE acre 3.8 0. 0. 4029 TOTAL 868. 635. 4030 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 162.0 2527. 1764. 4030 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 51.0 546. 383. 4030 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.3 0. 0. 4030 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre C.2 1. 1. 4030 TOTAL 3074. 2147. 4033 101 SINGLE, FAMILY du 11.0 172. 120. 4033 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 0.6 3. 2. 4033 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.0 0. 0. 4033 6502 HOSPITAL acre 17.7 5988. 4404. 4033 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 5.0 2428. 1802. 4033 TOTAL 8590. 6327. 4036 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 81.0 1264. 882. 4036 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 64.0 493. 346. 4036 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.1 0. 0. 4036 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 42.3 6326. 4592. 1036 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 25.4 605. 464. 4036 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 3.3 0. 0. 4036 TOTAL 8688. 6284. 4037 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 65.0 1014. 708. 4037 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 140.0 1498. 1052. 4037 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 4.6 22. 16. 4037 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 14.9 0. 0. 4037 6102 CHURCH acre 1.2 64. 49. 4037 6502 HOSPITAL acre 1.3 452. 332. 4037 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 0.6 287. 213. 4037 7607 RESIDENTIAL RECREATION acre 0.2 0. 0. 4037 TOTAL 3337. 2369. 4040 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 136.0 2122. 1480. 4040 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 29.0 310. 218. 4040 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 8.0 62. 43. 23jun10/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 3ase trip generation and land use by zone page Land Use Trips 'Gene Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4040 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 0.7 3. 2. 4040 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.7 0. 0. 4040 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 9.4 14C6. 1C21. 4040 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 5.7 135. 103. 4040 TOTAL 4037. 2E68. 4041 101 S_NGLL FAMILY. du 94.0 1466. 1023. 4041 102 MULTI --FAMILY du 19.0 203. 143. 4041 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.3 0. 0. 4041 TOTAL 1670. 1166. 4043 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 112.0 1747. 1219. 4043 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 567.0 6067. 4259. 1043 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 52.0 400. 281. 4043 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 7.9 0. 0. 4043 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 31.5 4717. 3424. 4043 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 19.0 452. 347. 4043 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 1.0 0. 0. 4043 TOTAL 13383. 9530. 404E 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 109.0 1700. 1187. 404E 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 25.0 267. 188. 4048 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.3 0. 0. 404E TOTAL 1968. 1374. 4049 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 31.0 239. 168. 4049 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 3.6 0. 0. 4049 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 33.0 4944. 3589. 4049 66012 NC MU OFFICE acre 19.9 473. 363. 4049 TOTAL 5656. 4120. 4053 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 250.0 2675. 1878. 4053 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 78.0 601. 422. 4053 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 2.6 12. 9. 4053 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 4.4 0. 0. 4053 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 41.8 6259. 4544. 4053 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 25.2 599. 459. 4053 6102 CHURCH acre 0.7 36. 28. 4053 6509 OTHER HFA.TH CARE acre 2.0 970. 719. 4053 TOTAL 11152. 8059. 40566 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 3.0 47. 33. 4056 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 700.0 6090. 4276. 40566 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 200.0 12480. 8830. 4056 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 200.0 5220. 4001. 4056 TOTAL 23E37. 17139. 4060 4112 RIGHT-CF-VIAY acre 33.! 0. 0. 4060 6701 MILITARY USE acre 109.8 0. 0. 4065 TOTAL 0. 0. 4062 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 160.0 2496. 1742. 23jun10/14:49.55/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Scuthbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone Page 4 Land Usc --- - -Trips Zone Code Namc Type Amount Person Vehicle 4062 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.5 0. 0. 4062 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.3 0. 0. 4062 TOTAL 2496. 1742. 4063 101 SING-E FAMILY du 111.0 1732. 1208. 4063 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 157.01680. 1179. 4063 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 31.0 239. 168. 4063 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.8 0. 0. 4063 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 52.2 7806. 5667. 4063 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 31.4 747. 573. 4063 6102 CHURCH acre 2.0 107. 82. 4063 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 0.2 112. 83. 4063 TOTAL 12422. 8960. 4065 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 188.0 2933. 2047. 4065 162 NC MU MULTI-F_M11LY Go 23.0 177. 124. 4065 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.6 0. 0. 4065 4114 PARKING acre 0.3 0. 0. 4065 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 12.5 188i. 1370. 4065 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 7.6 181. 138. 4065 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4065 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 0.1 9. 8. 4065 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.4 0. 0. 4065 TOTAL 7305. 4872. 4066 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 69.0 1076. 751. 4066 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 114.0 1220. 856. 4066 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 12.0 92. 65. 4066 4112 RICH'T-OF-WAY acre 19.9 0. 0. 4066 4114 PARKING acre 0.3 0. 0. 4066 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 14.8 2216. 1509. 4066 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 8.9 212. 163. 4066 6102 CHURCH acre 0.4 21. 16. 4066 TOTAL 4838. 3460. 4069 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 8.0 0. 0. 4069 6701 MILITARY USE acre 208.7 0. 0. 4069 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 138.4 0. 0. 4069 TOTAL 0. 0. 4071 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 10.0 156. 109. 4071 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 54.0 416. 292. 4071 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.5 0. 0. 4071 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 37.2 5557. 4034. 4071 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 22.4 532. 408. 4071 TOTAL 6661. 4843. 4072 162 NC MU MULTI FAMILY du 22.0 169. 119. 4072 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.1 0. 0. 4072 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 32.5 4856. 3526. 4072 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 19.5 465. 356. 4072 TOTAL 5491. 4001. CVSR(Chula Vsta Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 5 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4074 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 34.0 530. 370. 4074 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 8.0 86. 60. 4074 162 NC MU MULTT-FAMTT,Y ou 28.0 216. 151. 4074 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.4 0. 4074 4114 PARKING acre. 0.4 0. 4074 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 29.7 4439. 3223. 4074 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 11.9 425. 326. 4074 TOTAL 5695. 4130. 4075 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 700.0 6090. 4276. 4C75 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 200.0 12480. 8830. 4075 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 200.0 5220. 4001. 4075 TOTAL 23790. 17107. 4076 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 3.0 47. 33. 4016 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 106.0 1134. 796. 4076 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 101.0 824. 5i8. 4076 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.6 0. 0. 4076 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 54.2 8103. 5882. 4076 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 32.6 775. 594. 4076 TOTAL 10883. 7884. 4077 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 3.0 47. 33. 4077 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 56.0 599. 421. 4077 162 NC MU MUL'='1-FAMILY du 68.0 521. 368. 4077 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.1 0. 0. 4011 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 46.8 7007. 5087. 4077 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 28.2 671. 514. 4077 TOTAL 8848. 6422. 4080 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 1000.0 8700. 6108. 4080 5014 SPFCT.ASITY COMMERCIAL NC acre 200.0 12480. 8830. 4080 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 70.0 1827. 1400. 4080 'TOTAL 23007. 16338. 4081 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 152.0 2371. 1655. 4081 162 NC MU MULTI FAMILY du 5.0 38. 27. 4081 4112 RIGHT OF -WAY acre 13.2 0. 0. 4081 5027 NC MU RETP_IL acre 21.0 3148. 2285. 4081 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 12.7 301. 231. 1581 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.6 0. 0. 4081 TOTAL 5859. 4198. 4082 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 269.0 4196. 2928. 4282 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 62.0 663. 466. 4082 162 NC MU M[JLTI-FAMILY du 74.0 570. 400. 1082 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 17.2 0. 0. 4082 4113 COMMUNTCATION OR UTILITY acre 0.3 1. 1. 4082 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.5 682. 495. 4082 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 114.5 17128. 12939. 4082 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 68.9 1639. 1257. 4082 i`O'1'AL 24880. 17981. CVSB(Chula Vista Sou0hbay) 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4084 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 65.0 500. 351. 4084 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 12.8 0. 0. 4034 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 44.2 6608. 4798. 4084 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 26.6 633. 485. 4084 TOTAL 7741. 5634. 4086 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 151.0 11_63. 816. 4086 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.1 0. 0. 4086 S027 NC MU RETAIL acre 80.9 12102. 8785. 4086 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 48.7 1158. 888. 4086 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4086 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4086 TOTAL 16541. 11674. 4087 162 NC MU MUT,TT-FAMILY du 161.0 1240. 830. 4087 4112 RIGHT-OF-WA.Y acre 5.7 0. 0. 4087 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 82.5 12342. 8960. 4087 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 49.6 1181. 905. 4087 TOTAL 14763. 10735. 4092 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 88.0 1373. 958. 4092 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 6.0 46. 32. 4092 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.0 0. 0. 4092 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 3.7 554. 402. 4092 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 2.2 53. 41. 4092 6807 SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE acre 3.8 964. 739. 4092 TOTAL 2990. 2172. 4093 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.4 0. 0. 4093 6003 GOV'T OFFICE OR CENTER acre 6.1 6433. 4830. 4093 6103 LIBRARY scan 3.5 1531. 1038. 4093 7601 ACTIVE PARE ecLe 46.2 3073. 2023. 4093 TOTAL 11037. 7890. 4094 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 1000.0 8700. 6108. 4094 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL, NC acre 200.0 12480. 8830. 4094 6003 GOV'T OFFICE 0R CENTER acre 1.2 1248. 93Y. 4094 6008 LAW RISE, OFFICE NC acre 70.0 1827. 1400. 9094 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 1.9 373. 308. 4094 TOTAL 24628. 17583. 4095 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 55.0 858. 599. 4095 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 258.0 2761. 1938. 4095 162 NC MU MULTI FAMILY du 16.0 123. 86. 4095 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 7.6 0. 0. 4095 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 10.8 1613. 1171. 4095 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 6.5 154. 118. 4095 6102 CHURCH acrc 1.7 91. 70. 1095 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 0.2 12. 8. 4095 TOTAL 5612. 3991. 4097 101 SINGLE, FAMILY du 196.0 3058. 2134. 23jun10/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 7 Land Use ---- Trips ZoneCode Name Type Acicunt Person Vehicle 4097 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 298.0 3189. 2239. 4097 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 1.0 8. 5. 4091 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 1E.1 0. 0. 4097 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 15.0 2239. 1626. 4097 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 9.0 214. 164. 4097 6102 CHURCH acre 0.9 50. 38. 4097 TOTAL 8757. 6206. 4098 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 27.0 421. 294. 4098 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 317.0 2758. 1936. 4098 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 2.0 8. 6. 4098 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 63.4 3936. 2799. 4098 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 126.8 3309. 2.537. 4098 TOTAL 10453. 7572. 1.101 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 130.0 2028. 1415. 4101 4112 RTGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.0 0. 0. 4101 6102 CHURCH acre 0.6 35. 27. 4101 6805 JUNIOR HIGH OR MT )LE SCHOOL acre 1.0 4206. 2586. 4101 13'1AL 6268. 4028. 4102 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 94.0 1466. 1023. 4102 109 MULTI FAMILY du 218.0 1897. 1332. 4102 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 2.2 220. `78. 4102 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 49.8 3108. 2199. 4102 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 124.3 3244. 2487. 4102 TOTAL 9935. 7218. 4103 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 9.2 923. /46. 4103 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 12.1 0. 0. 4103 .500/ STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 250. 181. 4103 9700 MIXED USE /5o S'IREETFRON'T acre 0.1 109. 79. 4103 TOTAL 1281. 1006. 4104 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 6.0 94. 65. 4124 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 48.0 514. 361. 4104 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 17.0 131. 92. 4104 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.3 0. 0. 4104 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 35.0 5238. 3803. 4104 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 21.1 501. 384. 4104 TOTAL 6478. 4705. 4107 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 189.0 2948. 2057. 410/ 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 47.0 503. 353. 410/ 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 17.7 0. 0. 4107 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 13.0 1940. 1498. 410/ 6012 NC MU OF17CE acre 7.8 186. 142. 410/ TOTAL 5577. 3961. 4108 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 20.0 312. 218. 4108 109 MULTI -FAMILY du T.10.5 957. 672. 4108 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 0.2 2C. 16. 23jun10/14:49:53/tgn.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay(- 2030 Rase trip generation and land use by zone page 8 Land Use -------- ----- 'Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4108 5011 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 118.2 1376. 5219. 4108 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 237.9 6209. 4759. 4108 TOTAL 14874. 10884. 4139 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 0.8 0. 4109 TOTAL 0. 4110 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 6.0 46. 32. 4110 5027 NC MU RETAIT1 acre 5.2 776. 563. 4110 6012 NC MU OFFICEE acre 3.1 74. 57. 4110 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4110 TOTAL 896. 653. 4114 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 55.0 858. 599. 4114 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 73.0 781. 548. 4114 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.8 0. 0. 4114 6805 JUNIOR HIGH CR MIDDLE SCHOOL acre 1.0 4206. 2586. 4114 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4114 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 1.5 0. 0. 4114 TOTAL 7963. 4918. 411/ 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 600.0 5220. 3665. 4117 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 203.0 12480. 8830. 4117 6008 LOM RISE OFFICE NC acre 40.0 1044. 800. 4117 6103 LIBRARY acre 10.5 4591. 3113. 4117 TOTAL 23335. 16408. 4118 4112 RIGHT -OF -MAY acre 1.0 0. 0. 4118 TOTAT, 0. 0. 4119 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 14.9 0. 0. 4119 6105 FIRE OR POLICE STATION acre 4.2 1296. 956. 4119 9700 MIXED USE 75% S'1'REETFRONT acre 9.2 8931. 6484. 4119 TOTAL 10227. 7439. 4121 2001 HEAVY INDUSTRY acre 7.7 601. 497. 4121 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 0.3 50. 41. 4121 2103 LIGTIT INDUSTRY acre 12.0 1199. 969. 4121 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 26.6 0. 0. 4121 9700 MIXED USE 751 STREETFRONT acre 1.1 1085. 788. 4121 TOTAL 2934. 2294. 4124 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 123.0 1919. 1339. 4124 :02 `40LTI-FAMTT,Y du 116.0 1241. 871. 4124 4_12 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.3 0. 0. 4124 5009 OTHER COMMERC`AT, acre 0.o 59. 43. 4124 TOTAL 3219. 2253. 4125 102 MULTI FAMILY du 15.0 1E0. 113. 4125 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 13.0 100. /0. 4125 4112 RIGHT -OF WAY acre 6.8 0. 0. 4125 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 35.2 5260. 3818. 23jun10/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page '.and Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4125 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 21.1 503. 386. 4125 TOTAL 6024. 4387. 4126 2001 HEAVY INDUSTRY acre 38.8 3017. 2495. 4126 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 5.1 98C. 803. 4126 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 32.3 3235. 2615. 4126 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 8.5 282. 231. 4126 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 19.7 0. 0. 4126 6701 MILITARY USE acre 0.5 0. 0. 4126 TOTAL 7515. 6144. 4128 1503 RESORT acre 4.0 632. 389. 4128 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 13.0 1302. 1053. 4128 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 97.2 3219. 2631. 4128 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 23.5 0. 0. 4128 4114 PARKING acre 2.3 0. 0. 4128 4120 MARINE TERMINAL acre 82.4 1170. 968. 4128 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 3.4 224. 148. 4128 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 675.8 0. 0. 4128 TOTAL 6548. 5188. 4129 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 182.0 2839. 1981. 4129 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 21.0 225. 158. 4129 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 12.1 0. 0. 4129 6102 CHURCH acre 0.5 29. 22. 4129 TOTAL 3093. 2161. 4130 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 32.0 499. 348. 4130 102 'MULTI FAMILY du 628.0 6720. 4718. 4130 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.3 0. 0. 4130 6109 OTHER FUBLIC SERVICE acre 0.4 156. 113. 4130 TOTAL 7375. 5179. 4132 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.9 0. 0. 4132 5006 AUTO COMMERC=AL acre 23.4 11028. 7803. 4132 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.4 631. 458. 4132 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 23. 17. 4132. 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 1.0 465. 360. 4132 9700 `_4IXED USE 7.5 STREETFRONT acre 0.6 611. 444. 4132 TOTAL 12778. 9081. 4134 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 367.0 3183. 2242. 4134 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 254.0 15850. 11214. 4134 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 368.6 9620. 7374. 4134 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 2.0 4237. 2370. 4134 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 33.6 2240. 1474. 4134 TOTAL 35140. 24674. 4136 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 156.0 2434. 1698. 4136 TOTAL 2434. 1698. 4139 101 STNGLF FAMTLY do 17.0 265. 185. 23jun10/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVS9(Chu1a Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 10 _..--._---------- Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4129 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 184.0 1969. 1382. 4139 1112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.4 0. 0. 4139 TOTAL 2234. 1567. 4144 10`- SINGLE FAMILY du 33.0 .515. 359. 4144 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 1.0 0. 0. 4144 TOTAL 515. 359. 4145 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 8.0 62. 43. 4145 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 18.8 1886. 1524. 4145 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 14.0 0. 0. 4145 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 4.3 643. 461. 4143 6012 NC MU OFFT^R acre 2.6 62. 47. 4145 TOTAL 2652. 2081. 4142 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 13.0 203. 142. 4147 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 14.0 150. 105. 4147 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 45.0 346. 243. 4147 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 1.1 5. 4. 4147 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.8 0. 0. 4147 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 37.7 5639. 4093. 4147 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 22.7 540. 414. 4147 TOTAL 6882. 5001. 4148 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 71.0 1108. 773. 4148 102 MULTI FAMILY du 142.0 1519. 1067. 4148 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 20.0 154. 108. 4148 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.5 0. 0. 4148 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 18.0 2697. 1958. 4148 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 10.9 258. 198. 4148 6804 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL acre 1.0 5369. 2423. 4148 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4148 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4148 TOTAL 13224. 7211. 4149 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 613.0 9563. 6673. 4149 4112 RIGHT CF WAY acre 63.9 0. 0. 4149 6102 CHURCH acre 2.1 112. 86. 4149 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 2.2 150. 98. 4149 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.9 0. 0. 4149 TOTAL 9825. 6858. 4150 109 MULTI-FAMTI.Y du 358.0 3115. 2187. 1150 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 194.8 12156. 8600. 4155 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 246.1 6423. 4923. 1150 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 1.7 333. 275. 4150 TOTAL 22027. 15985. 4151 101 SINGLE FAMTLY du 91.0 1420. 991. 4151 102 MULTI-FAMTT.Y du 295.0 3156. 2216. 4151 162 NC MU MULTI-FAMTLY du 26.0 210. 241. 4151 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 1.2 236. 194. 23jun10/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVSB)Chula Vista Scuthhay)- 2030 Rase trip generation and land use by zone page 11 Land Use ----- - - Trips- - Zone Code Name Type Amcunt Perscn Vehicle 4151 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.1 0. 0. 4151 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 3.2 1524. 1078. 4151 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 23.7 3547. 2575. 4151 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 14.3 339. 260. 4151 9101_NAC4'1VE USE acre C.0 0. 0. 4151 TOTAL 10423. 7454. 4153 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 5.0 78. 54. 4153 162 NC MU 'MULTI -FAMILY du 171.0 1317. 924. 4153 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.8 0. 0. 4153 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 98.3 14709. 10679. 4153 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 59.2 1408. 1079. 4153 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 16.0 0. O. 4153 'O'1'AL 17512. 12737. 4155 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 10.9 0. 0. 4155 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 21.2 10009. 7082. 4155 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.3 393. 286. 4155 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.6 587. 426. 4155 TOTAL 10989. 7793. 4164 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 31.1 5975. 4898. 4164 2104 WAREHOUSING CR STORAGE acre 1.9 63. 52. 4164 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 37.8 0. 0. 4164 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 5.8 0. 0. 4164 TOTAL 6038. 4950. 4166 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 642.0 4943. 3471. 4166 4112 RIGHT-OF-SJAY acre 4C.5 0. 0. 4166 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 301.5 45108. 32747. 4166 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 181.4 4317. 3309. 4166 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 53.7 0. 0. 4156 TOTAL 54369. 39527. 4168 1501 LOW-RISE HOTEL OR MOTEL acre 5.9 2004. 1235. 4168 1503 RESORT acre 24.0 3837. 2365. 4168 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 41.6 4168. 3369. 4168 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 9.9 0. 0. 4168 5014 SPECIALITY COMMERCIAL NC acre 50.0 3120. 2207. 4168 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 26.7 0. C. 4168 TOTA1, 13129. 9177. 4170 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 63.0 485. 341. 4170 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 17.9 0. 0. 4170 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 2.5 10. 8. 4170 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 48.4 7241. 5257. 4170 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 29.1 693. 531. 4170 TOTAL 8429. 6136. 4179 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 45.0 346. 243. 4179 4112 R1GHT-OF-WAY acre 2.9 0. 0. 4179 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 4.4 2059. 1457. 23jun10/14:49:55/tqm.pr CVSBIChula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 12 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name 1'vpe Amount Person Vchicic 4179 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 4.7 602. 437. 4179 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 42.4 6344. 4606. 4179 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 25.5 607. 465. 4179 TOTAL 9959. 7209. 4168 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 13.6 2618. 2146. 4188 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 0.9 30. 24. 4188 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 54.9 0. 0. 4188 4114 PARKING acre 5.1 0. 0. 4188 5007 STREETFRCNT COMMERCIAL acre 0.8 1161. 842. 4188 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 33.1 0. 0. 4188 TOTAL 3808. 3013. 4191 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.3 0. 0. 4191 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 50.0 3120. 2207. 4191 7207 MARINA acre 20.2 1129. 771. 4191 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 20.2 0. 0. 4191 TOTAL 4249. 2978. 4281 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 199.2 0. 0. 4281 TOTAL 0. 0. 4606 2207 EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY acre 213.8 321. 265. 4606 TCTAL 321. 265. 4615 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 96.0 1498. 1045. 4615 102 MULTI FAMILY du 28.0 300. 210. 4615 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 6.0 0. 0. 4615 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4615 TOTAL 1797. 1255. 4616 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 87.0 1357. 947. 4616 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 20.0 214. 150. 4616 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.2 0. 0. 4616 TOTAL 1571. 1097. 4617 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 1.0 16. 11. 4617 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.8 0. 0. 4617 5027 NC MU RFTATL acre 10.1 1515. 1100. 4617 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 6.1 145. 111. 4617 TOTAL 1675. 1222. 4618 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 158.0 2465. 1720. 4618 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 178.0 1905. 1337. 4618 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 6.0 46. 32. 4618 4112 RIGHT-OF-W.AY acre 13.1 0. 0. 4618 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 9.8 1461. 1061. 4618 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 5.9 140. 107. 4618 TOTAL 6017. 4257. 4619 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 125.0 1950. 1361. 4619 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 50.0 535. 376. 23jun10/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Scuthbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page ' 3 Land Use Trips Zone Cede Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4619 9112 RIGHT--OF-NAY acre 5.2 0. 0. 4619 TOTAL 2485. 1736. 4620 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 104.0 1622. 1132. 4620 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 32.0 342. 240. 4620 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.4 0. 0. 4620 6102 CHURCH acre 0.2 11. 8. 4620 'TOTAL 1976. 381. 4621 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 175.0 2730.1905. 4621 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 184.0 1969. 1382. 4621 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.2 0. 0. 462- TOTAL 4699. 3287. 4622 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 64.0 998. 697. 4622 102 MULT_-FAMILY du 42.0 449. 316. 4622 162 NC MU MULTI --FAMILY du 1.0 8. 5. 4622 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.9 0. 0. 4622 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 15.0 2244. 1629. 4622 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 9.0 215. 165. 1627 TOTAL 3914. 2811. 4623 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 5.0 78. 54. 4623 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 229.0 2450. 1720. 4623 162 NC MU MULTI-FAPIILY du 17.0 131. 92. 4623 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 12.4 0. 0. 4623 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 20.6 3082. 2238. 4623 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 12.4 295. 226. 4623 TOTAL 6036. 4330. 4624 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 27.0 235. 165. 4624 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 29.5 1641. 1302. 4624 6008 LOW RISE CFFICE NC acre 59.5 1553. 1190. 4624 TOTAL 3629. 2658. 4625 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 5.6 557. 450. 4625 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 19.6 0. 0. 4625 6003 GOV'T OFFICE OR CENTER acre 4.4 4707. 3534. 4625 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 1.7 347. 286. 4625 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREE:FRONT acre 8.7 8470. 6149. 4625 TOTAL 14080. 10419. 4626 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 51.0 796. 555. 4626 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 64.0 685. 481. 4626 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 1.0 8. 5. 4626 4112 RIGHIT-OF-WAY acre 9.1 0. 0. 4626 4114 PARKING acre 0.2 0. 0. 4626 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 3.6 542. 393. 4626 6012 NC `AU OFFICE acre 2.2 52. 40. 4626 6102 CHURCH acre 0.1 6. 5. 4626 6109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 0.9 365. 264. 4626 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 0.5 231. 171. 23junI0/14:49:55/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula VisLa SouLhbay) 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 14 -- Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4626 7621 ACTIVE PARK acre 0.3 23. 15. 1626 TOTAL 2707. 1930. 4627 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 18.0 281. 196. 4627 102 MULTI FAMILY du -23.0 1316. 924. 4627 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 2.0 15. 11. 4627 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.0 0. 0. 4627 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 1.9 284. 206. 4627 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 1.1 27. 21. '627 6109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 0.4 156. 113. 4627 TOTAL 2080. 1471. 4628 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 11.0 172. 120. 4628 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 375.0 4012. 2817. 4628 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.7 0. 0. 4628 6109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 1.7 676. 489. 4628 TOTAL 4860. 3425. 4629 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 4.1. 410. 332. 4629 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.9 0. 0. 4629 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.1 130. 95. 4629 TOTAL 541. 426. 4630 109 MULTI -FAMILY du 245.0 2131. 1496. 4630 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 169.3 10564. 7475. 4630 6008 LOW RISE OFFICE NC acre 245.8 6415. 4917. 4630 TOTAL 19111. 13888. 4631 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 101.0 1576. 1099. 4631 102 MULTT-FAMTTY du 475.0 5082. 3568. 4631 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.1 0. 0. 4631 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.1 0. 0. 4631 TOTAL 6658. 4668. 4632 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 195.0 3042. 2123. 4632 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 240.0 2568. 1803. 4632 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 10.0 17. 54. 4632 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.3 0. 0. 4632 5021 NC MU RETAIL acre 25.3 3791. 2752. 4632 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 15.2 363. 278. 4632 1'O'1AL 9841. 7010. 4633 162 NC MU MULTI--FLLAILY du 2.0 15. 11. 4633 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 0.9 89. 72. 4633 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.2 0. 0. 4633 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 2.8 415. 301. 1633 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 1.7 40. 30. 4633 TOTAL 558. 414. 4634 1501 LON-RISE HOTEL OR MOTEL acre 6.0 2038. 1256. 4634 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 1.5 0. 0. 4634 5014 SPECIALTY COMMERCIAL NC acre 16.0 998. 706. 4634 TOTAL 3036. 1963. CVSB(Chu-a Vista Southbay)- 203'C Base trip generation and land use by zone page 15 Land Use Trips Zone Cede Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4635 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 70.0 539. 378. 4635 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.8 0.3. 4635 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 37.9 5668. 4115. 4635 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 22.8 543. 416. 4635 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 2.3 0. 4635 TOTAL 6750. 4909. 4636 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 17.6 3381. 2772. 4636 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 9.0 0. 2. 4636 TOTAL 3381. 2772. 4637 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 114.0 1778. 1241. 4637 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.8 0. 4637 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 7.6 307. 333. 4637 TOTAL 2285. 1574. 4638 181 SINGLE FAMILY du 37.0 377. 403. 4638 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 141.0 1509. 1059. 4638 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 2.0 15. 11. 4638 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 15.3 0. 0. 4638 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 1.4 204. 148. 4638 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 0.8 20. 15. 9638 7601 ACTIVE PARE acre 62.8 4179. 2750. 4638 TOTAL 6504. 4386. 4639 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 6.4 1236. 1014. 4639 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 0.4 38. 31. 4639 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 7.6 252. 206. 4639 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.5 0. 0. 9639 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 9.1 4320. 3057. 9639 TOTAL 5846. 4306. 4640 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 82.0 631. 443. 4640 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.9 0. 0. 4640 5027 NC MU RETATT acre 59.2 8853. 6427. 4640 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 35.6 847. 649. 4640 TOTAL 10332. 7520. 46641 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 115.0 885. 622. 464] 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.0 0. O. 4641 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 57.6 8620. 6258. 4611 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 34.7 825. 632. 4611 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.8 0. 0. 4641 TOTAL 10330. 7512. 4642 162 NC MU MULTI -FAMILY du 104.0 801. 562. 4642 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 0.8 0. 0. 4642 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 49.9 7470. 5423. 4642 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 30.0 755. 548. 4642 TOTAL 8996. 6533. 4643 121 SINGLE FAMILY du 24.0 261. 23jun1C/14:49:55/tgm..nr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 16 nand Use Trips Zone Cone Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4643 102 MULTI--'AMILY du 133.0 1423. 999. 4643 162 NC MU MULTI FAMILY du 1.0 8. 5. 4643 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 2.9 0. 0. 4643 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 5.1 763. 554. 4643 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 3.1 73. 56. 4643 6102 CHURCH acre 1.0 56. 43. 4643 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4643 TOTAL 4816. 3104_ 4644 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 215.0 3354. 2340. 4644 1C2 MULTI -FAMILY du 16.0 171. 120. 4644 4112 RIGIIT-OF-WAY acre 8.7 0. 0. 4644 41:3 COMMUN_CATION 0R UTILITY acre 0.3 1. 1. 4644 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.1 138. 100. 4644 610.2 CHURCH acre 0.5 28. 21. 4644 6105 FTRF 0R POLICE STATION acre 0.3 104. 77. 4644 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 219. 1185. 4644 TOTAL 5915. 3845. 4645 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 20.0 3_2. 218. 4645 4112 RIGIIT-OF-WAY acre 0.5 0. 0. 4645 6102 CHURCH acre 8.2 439. 337. 4645 TOTAL 151. 555. 4646 162 NC NU MULTI -FAMILY du 40.0 308. 216. 4646 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 25.5 3816. 2771. 4646 6012 NC MU OFFICE acre 15.4 365. 280. 4646 TOTAL 4490. 3267. 4648 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 8.0 125. 87. 4648 103 MOBILE HOME PARK du 178.0 1175. 779. 4648 162 NC MU MULTI FAMILY du 7.0 34. 38. 4648 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.9 0. 0. 4648 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.6 881. 639. 4648 5027 NC MU RETAIL acre 6.3 944. 686. 4648 6012 NC MO OFFICE acre 3.8 90. 69. 4648 TOTAL 3269. 2298. 4649 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 41.0 640. 446. 4649 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.2 0. 0. 4649 4113 COMMUNICATION 0R UTILITY acre 0.2 1. 1. 4649 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 3.7 0. 0. 4649 TOTAL 641. 447. 4650 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 99.0 1544. 1078. 4650 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.8 0. 0. 4650 TOTAL 1544. 1078. 4651 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 67.0 1045. 729. 4651 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.8 0. 0. 4651 TOTAL 1045. 729. 23jun10/14:49:55/Lym.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Scuthbay) 2030 Base trip generaticn and land use by zcne page 17 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amooint Person Vehicle 4652 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 47.0 733. 512. 4652 5014 SPECIAL''FY COMMERCIAL NC acre 12.4 774. 547. 4652 TOTAL 1507. 1059. 23junl0/14:49: 5/tcm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 1 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount ?erson Vehicle 3946 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre C.4 0. 0. 3946 TOTAL 0. 0. 3990 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 176.0 2446. 1916. 3990 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.8 0. 0. 3990 TOTAL 2746. 1916. 3992 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 200.0 3120. 2177. 3992 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.7 0. 0. 3992 TOTAL 3120. 2177. 4001 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 229.0 35/2. 2493. 4001 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.8 0. 0. 4001 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.4 0. 0. 4001 TOTAL 3572. 2493. 4002 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 47.0 733. 512. 4002 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.2 0. 0. 4002 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 6.7 10219. 7231. 4002 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (CBE) acre 0.8 1078. 783. 4002 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 3.0 2891. 2099. 4002 TOTAL 14923. 10624. 4006 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 290.0 4524. 3157. 4006 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 22.2 0. 0. 4006 4113 COMIIUNICATICN OR UTTT.TTY acre 2.0 8. 6. 4006 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4006 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 2.4 0. 0. 4006 TOTAL 6651. 4348. 4015 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 76.0 1186. 827. 4015 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 10.4 0. 0. 4015 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTIL=TY acre 0.6 2. 2. 4C15 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4015 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 23.4 1556. 1024. 4015 8002 INTENSIVE AGRICULTURE acre 1.5 1. 1. 4015 TOTAL 4863. 3039. 4017 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 111.0 1732. 1208. 4017 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 288.0 3082. 2163. 4017 103 MOBILE HOME PARK du 87.0 574. 381. 4017 4112 RIGIIT-OF-WAY acre 12.1 0. 0. 4017 5004 NEIGHBORIICOD COMMERCIAL acre 1.9 2910. 2059. 4017 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 301. 218. 4017 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.3 33. 24. 4017 91C1 INACTIVE USE acre 0.6 0. 0. 4017 9700 MIXED USE /5% STREETFRONT acre 2.5 2468. 1792. 4017 TOTAL 11120. 7846. 4027 181 SINGLE FAMILY du 70.0 1092. 762. 4027 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 60.0 642. 451. 4027 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.2 0. 0. 3jun10/10:13:24/Lym.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 2 Land [Jse Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4027 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.4 663. 481. 4027 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 0.3 113. 86. 4027 6102 CHURCH acre 2.2 115. 88. 4027 6502 HOSPITAL acre 12.0 4043. 29/4. 4027 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 1.4 671. 498. 4027 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 4.4 883. 728. 1027 7607 RESIDENTIAL, RFCREATTON acre 0.8 0. 0. 4027 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.0 983. 711. 4027 TOTAL 9204. 6783. 4029 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 16.6 0. 0. 4029 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.4 534. 388. 4029 6102 CHURCH acre 1.4 74. 57. 4029 6109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 0.9 361. 261. 102.9 6701 MILITARY USE acre 3.8 0. 0. 1029 TOTAL 968. 705. 4030 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 162.0 2527. 1764. 4030 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 51.0 546. 383. 4030 4112 RIGHT CF WAY acre 7.3 0. 0. 4030 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 0.2 1. 1. 4030 TOTAL 3074. 2147. 4033 1.1/1 SINGLE FAMILY du 11.0 172. 120. 1033 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 0.6 3. 2. 4033 1112 RTGHT-CF-WAY acre 4.0 0. 0. 4033 6502 HOSPITAL acre 17.7 5988. 4404. 4033 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 5.0 2428. 1802. 4033 101'AL 8590. 6327. 4036 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 81.0 1264. 882. 4036 4112 RIGHT CF WAY acre 11.1 0. 0. 4036 5004 NEIGHBGRH.OGD COMMERCIAL acre 10.4 15818. 11191. 4036 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.4 550. 400. 4036 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (CBE) acre 1.0 1379. 1001. 4036 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.3 0. 0. 4036 TOTAL 19011. 13474. 4037 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 65.0 1014. 708. 4037 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 140.0 1498. 1052. 4037 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 4.6 22. 16. 4037 4112 RIGHT CF WAY acre 14.9 0. 0. 4031 6102 CHURCH acre 1.2 64. 19. 4037 6502 HOSPITAL acre 1.3 452. 332. 4037 6509 OTHER HEAL:I14 CARE acre 0.6 297. 213. 4037 7607 RFSIDEN'TIAL RECREATION acre 0.2 0. 0. 4037 TOTAL 3337. 2369. 4040 201 SINGLE FAMILY du 146.0 2278. 1589. 4040 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 29.0 310. 218. 4040 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 0.7 3. 2. 4040 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 5.1 0. 0. 3junl0/10:13:24/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Rase trip generation and land use by zone page 3 Land Use - --- Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount. Person Vehicle 4040 5037 STRFETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.3 482. 350. 4040 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.8 106. 77. 4040 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.4 366. 266. 4040 TOTAL 3545. 2502. 4041 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 94.0 1466. 1023. 4041 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 19.0 203. 143. 4041 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre /.3 0. 0. 4041 TOTAT. 1670. 0166. 4043 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 122.0 1903. 1328. 4043 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 567.0 6067. 4259. 4043 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 7.9 0. 0. 4043 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 1.0 1552. T127. 4043 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 1.0 0. 0. 4043 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.5 1505. 1093. 4043 TOTAL 11027. 7807. 4048 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 109.0 1700. 1187. 4048 102 MULY1-FAMILY du 25.0 267. 188. 4048 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.3 0. 0. 4048 _'DIAL 1968. 1374. 4049 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 1.0 16. 11. 4049 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.6 0. 0. 4049 5004 NEIGHBORH00D COMMERCIAL acre 4.1 6276. 4440. 4049 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 3.7 5559. 4035. 4049 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.4 1338. 971. 4049 TOTAL 13188. 9458. 4053 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 250.0 26/S. 1878. 4053 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 2.6 12. 9. 4053 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.4 0. 0. 4053 5004 NEIGHBORH00D COMMERCIAL acre 7.5 11431. 8088. 4053 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 1.4 505. 387. 4053 6102 CHURCH acre 0.7 36. 28. 4053 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 2.0 970. 719. 4053 TOTAL 15629. 11109. 4056 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 3.0 4!. 33. 4056 102 MULTI-FAMTT,Y du 7.0 75. 53. 4056 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 10.7 0. 0. 4056 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 10.7 10434. 7575. 4056 TOTAL 10556. 7660. 4060 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 33.7 0. 0. 4060 6701 MILITARY USE acre 109.8 0. 0. 4060 TOTAL 0. 0. 4062 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 160.0 2496. 1742. 4062 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.5 U. 0. 4062 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.3 C. 0. 4062 TOTAL 2496. 1742. CVS2(Chu1a Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generat_on and land use by zone page 4 Land Use ------._-. Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4063 107 SINGLE FAMILY du 111.0 1732. 1208. 4063 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 157.0 1680. 1179. 4063 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.8 0. 0. 4063 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 1.4 2181. 1543. 4063 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.9 1321. 959. 4063 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 20. 14. 4063 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 0.5 181. 139. 4063 6102 CHURCH acre 2.0 107. 82. 4063 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 0.2 112. 83. 4063 9700 MIXED USE 75% S REETFRONT acre 7.0 6837. 4964. 4063 TOTAL 14169. 10171. 406E 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 188.0 2933. 2047. 4065 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.6 0. 0. 406E 4114 PARKING acre 0.3 0. 0. 4065 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 1.9 2816. 1992. 4065 9006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 1.6 766. 542. 4065 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. _185. 4065 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre C.1 9. 8. 4065 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 2.4 0. 0. 4065 TOTAL 8642. 5773. 4066 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 69.0 1076. 7.51. 4066 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 114.0 1220. 856. 4066 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 19.9 0. 0. 4066 4114 PARKING acre :i.3 0. 0. 4066 5004 NFTGEBORHCOD COMMERCIAL acre 2.5 3860. 2731. 4066 6102 CHURCH acre 0.4 21. 16. 4066 TOTAL 6177. 4355. 4069 4112 R1GHT-OF-WAY acre 6.0 0. 0. 4069 6701 MILITARY USE acre 208.7 0. 0. 4069 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 138.4 0. 0. 4069 TOTAL 0. 0. 4071 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 10.0 156. 109. 407 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.5 0. 0. 4071 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 7.6 11604. 8210. 4071 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 1.3164. 119. 4071 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREET FRONT acre 1.5 1414. 1026. 4071 TOTAL 13338. 9465. 4072 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.1 0. 0. 4072 9004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 2.5 3881. 2746. 4072 5007 S'-'REET FRONT COMMERCIAL acre 4.9 7376. 5355. 4072 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (OFF) acre 0.4 582. 423. 4072 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.1 1094. 794. 4072 TOTAL 12933. 9317. 4074 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 51.0 796. 555. 4074 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 8.0 86. 60. 4074 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.4 0. 0. 3jun_0/10:13:24/Lgm.pr CVSB(Chu=a Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zcne page 5 - - Land Use - Trips Zone Code Name Typo Amount Person Vehicle 4074 4114 PARKING acre 0.4 0. 0. 4074 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 1.8 2798. 1979. 4074 5007 STRFETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.6 918. 667. 4074 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 1.3 476. 365. 4074 6102 CHURCH acre 3.6 193. 148. 4014 9700 MIXED LSE 755 STREETFRONT acre 2.3 2198. 1596. 4074 TOTAL 7464. 5370. 4075 4112 RIG13T-OF-WAY acre 10.8 C. 4075 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 1.1 1694. 1230. 4075 9700 MIXED USE 751 STREETFRONT acre 11.7 11391. 8270. 4075 TOTAL 13085. 9500. 4076 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 3.0 47. 33. 4076 1C2 MULTI -FAMILY du 106.0 1134. 796. 4076 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.6 O. 4076 50C4 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 12.5 19073. 13495. 4076 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.5 742. 536. 4076 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (CBF) acre 0.4 529. 384. 4076 9700 MIXED USE 751 STREETFRCNT acre 1.7 1644. 1193. 4076 TOTATL 23169. 16440. 4077 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 8.0 125. 87. 40i7 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 56.0 599. 421. 4077 1501 LOW RISE HOTEL CR MOTEL acre 0.8 258. 159. 4077 4112 R.IGHT OF WAY acre 4.1 0. 0. 4077 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 9.1 13849. 9798. 4077 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.9 1844. 1339. 4077 TOTAL 16675. 11804. 4080 10= SINGLE FAMILY da 17.0 265. 185. 4080 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 28.0 300. 210. 4080 4112 RIGET-OF-WAY acre 10.9 0. 0. 4080 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 10.0 9719. 7056. 4080 20T2T, 10284. 7451. 4081 101 SINGLE FAMILY An 187.0 2911. 2036. 4081 4112 RIGHT -OBI -WAY acre 13.2 0. 0. 4081 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.6 0. 0. 4081 'CTAT, 2917. 2036. 4082 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 269.0 4196. 2928. 4082 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 62.0 663. 466_ 4082 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 17.2 0. 0. 4082 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 0.3 1. 1. 4082 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 1.6 2388. 1734. 4082 6102 CHURCH acre 2.5 134. 103. 4082 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 0.6 110. 91. 4082 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 2.3 2233. 1621. 4082 TOTAL, 9725. 6943. 4084 102 NICL11-FAMILY du 58.0 621. 436. 3jun10/10:13:24,'tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 6 --- Land Use Trips Zone Cede Name I'ypo Amount Person Vehicle 4084 1501 LOW-RISE HOTEL CR MOTEL acre 3.2 1078. 665. 4081 1112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 12.8 0. 0. 4084 5007 STRFETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 2.3 3499. 2541. 4084 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (CRF) acre 0.7 869. 631. 4084 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.5 68. 50. 4084 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 3.4 146. 112. 4084 9700 MIXED USE /5o STREETFRONT acre 3.0 2899. 2105. 4084 TOTAL 9180. 6537. 1086 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.1 0. 0. 4086 5003 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL acre 14.5 12187. 8623. 4086 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCTAL acre 7.0 10679. 3556. 4086 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 1.0 1466. 1064. 4086 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4086 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4086 TOTAL 26150. 18427. 4087 4T12 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.7 0. 0. 4087 5003 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL acre 9.4 7907. 5594. 4087 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 13.6 20688. 14637. 4087 TOTAL 28594. 20231. 4092 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 88.0 1373. 958. 4092 4112 RIGHT OF -WAY acre 6.0 0. 0. 4092 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 1.0 369. 282. 4092 6807 SCHOOL DISTRICT OFFICE acre 3.8 964. 739. 4092 TOTAL 2706. 1979. 4093 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.5 0. 0. 4093 6003 GOV'T OFFICE OR CENTER acre 3.0 3216. 2415. 4093 6103 T.TRRARY acre 1.8 766. 519. 4093 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 23.1 1537. 1011. 4093 TOTAL 5519. 3945. 4094 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.5 0. 0. 4094 6003 GOV'T OFFICE OR CENTER acre 0.6 624. 468. 4094 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 1.6 319. 264. 4094 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 7.2 7039. 5110. 4094 TOTAL 7982. 5842. 4095 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 58.0 905. 631. 4095 102 MULTI-FAMTLY du 258.0 2761. 1938. 4095 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.6 0. 0. 4095 6102 CHURCH acre 1.7 91. 70. 4095 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 0.2 12. 8. 4095 9700 MTXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.2 1194. 867. 4095 TOTAT, 4963. 3515. 4097 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 196.0 3058. 2134. 4097 102 MUL'1'1-FAMILY du 298.0 3189. 2239. 4097 4112 RICH'2-OF-WAY acre 18.1 0. 0. 4097 SO'U3 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.3 399. 290. 3jun10/10:13:24/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Scuthbay) 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone pace Land Use ---- Trips Zeno Code 'Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4097 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 0.1 37. 28. 4097 6102 CHURCH acre 0.9 50. 38. 4097 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.4 1372. 996. 4097 TOTAL 8104. 5725. 4098 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 36.0 562. 392. 4098 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.4 0. 0. 4098 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 0.2 1. 1. 4098 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 12.9 12492. 9069. 4098 TOTAL 13054. 9461. 1101 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 130.0 2028. 1415. 4101 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.0 0. 0. 4101 6102 CHURCH acre 0.6 35. 27. 4101 6805 JUNIOR HIGH OR MIDDLE SCHOOL acre 1.0 42C6. 2586. 4101 TOTAL 6268. 4028. 4102 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 83.0 1295. 904. 4102 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 9.0 96. 68. 4102 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 0.2 17. 13. 4102 4112 RIGHT-0E-WAY acre 16.1 0. 0. 4102 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 8.1 7897. 5733. 4102 TOTAL 9305. 6718. 4103 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 9.2 923. 746. 4103 4112 RIGH_-OF-WAY acre 12.1 0. 0. 4103 5007 STREETFRGNT COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 250. 181. 4103 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.1 109. 79. 4103 TOTAL 1281. 10,06. 4104 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 6.0 94. 65. 4104 102 MULTI --FAMILY du 48.0 54. 361. 4104 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 5.3 0. 0. 4104 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 7.3 10914. 7923. 4104 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (CBF) acre 0.5 669. 486. 4104 6104 POST OFFICE acre 1.0 1081. 751. 4104 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREFTFRONT acre 0.9 899. 652. 1104 TOTAL 14170. 10239. 4107 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 201.0 3136. 2188. 4107 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 47.0 503. 353. 4107 4112 RIGHT -OF --WAY acre 17.7 0. 0. 4107 TOTAL 3639. 2541. 4108 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 17.0 265. 185. 4108 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 0.0 3. 2. 4108 4112 RIGHT CF-WAY acre 12.9 0. 0. 4108 S009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 6.3 807. 586. 4108 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 4.5 4333. 3147. 4108 TOTAL 5410. 3920. 4109 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 0.8 0. 0. 4109 TOTAL 0. 0. CVSB(Chuia Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 8 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 411C 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4110 TOTAL 0. 0. 4114 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 55.0 858. 599. 4114 102 MULTI -FAMILY ou 73.0 781. 548. 4114 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 7.8 0. 0. 4114 6805 JUNIOR HIGH 0R MIDDLE SCHOOL acre 1.0 4206. 2586. 4114 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4114 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 1.5 0. 0. 4114 TOTAL 7963. 4918. 4117 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.2 0. 0. 4117 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 2.9 372. 270. 4117 6103 LIBRARY acre 2.1 9"_8. 623. 4117 9700 MTXRD USE 75% STRFFTFRONT acre 4.9 4804. 3487. 4117 TOTAL 6094. 4380. 4118 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.0 0. 0. 4118 TOTAL 0. 0. 4119 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 72.0 1123. 784. 4119 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 24.0 257. 180. 4119 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 8.5 0. 0. 4119 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.5 727. 528. 4119 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 2.6 333. 242. 4119 6102 CHURCH acre 0.3 18. 14. 4119 6105 FIRE OR POLICE STATION acre 1.4 432. 319. 4119 6109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 0.3 103. 75. 4119 9700 MIXED USE 756 STREETFRONT acre 2.2 2112. 1533. 4119 TOTAL 5106. 3674. 4121 2001 HEAVY INDUSTRY acre 7.7 601. 497. 4121 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 0.3 50. 41. 1121 2103 LTGHT INDUSTRY acre 12.0 1199. 969. 4121 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 26.6 0. 0. 4121 9700 MIXED USE 751 Si' 3E E'2FRONT acre 1.1 1085. 788. 4121 TOTAL 2931. 2294. 4124 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 123.0 1919. 1339. 4124 102 MULTT-FAMTLY du 116.0 1241. 871. 1121 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.3 0. 0. 4121 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.5 59. 43. 1121 TOTAL 3219. 2253. 4125 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 15.0 160. 113. 4125 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.8 0. 0. 4125 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 6.8 10216. 7416. 4125 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (CBI) acre 0.9 1193. 866. 1125 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 22. 16. 4120 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 0.1 37. 28. 4125 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.1 1049. 762. 4125 1'0'1AL 12678. 9202. CVSB(Chula Vista So9thbay)- 203C Base trip generation and land use by zone page Land Use _ _ _ .....Trips --._ Zone Cede Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4126 2001 HEAVY INDUSTRY acre 38.8 3017. 2495. 4126 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 5.1 985. 823. 4126 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 32.3 3235. 2615. 4126 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 8.5 282. 231. 4126 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 19.7 C. 0. 4126 6701 MILITARY LSE acre 0.5 C. 0. 4126 TOTAL 2515. 6144. 4128 E503 RESORT acre 4.0 632. 3E9. 4128 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 13.5 1302. 1053. 4128 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 97.2 3219. 2631. 4128 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 23.5 .,. 0. 4128 4114 ?ARKING acre 2.3 0. 4128 4120 MARINE TERMINAL acre 82.4 1170. 968. 4128 /601 ACTIVE PARK acre 3.4 224. 148. 4128 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 675.E 0. 0. 4128 TOTAL 6543. 5138. 4129 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 182.0 2839. 1981_ 4129 102 MULTI -FAMILY au 21.0 225. 158. 4129 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 12.' 0. 0. 4129 6102 CHURCH acre 0.5 29. 22. 4129 TOTAL 3093. 2161. 4130 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 32.0 499. 348. 4130 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 628.0 6720. 4718. 4130 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.3 0. 0. 4130 6109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 0.4 156. 113. 4130 TOTAL 737.5. 5179. 4132 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.9 0. 0. 4132 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 23.4 11028. 7803. 4132 3007 STREETFRCNT CCMMERC=AL acre 0.4 631. 458. 4132 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 23. 17. 4132 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 1.0 485. 360. 4132 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.6 611. 444. 4132 TOTAL 12778. 9081. 4134 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.i 0. 0. 4134 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 6.0 762. 554. 4134 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4134 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 3.1 209. 137. 4134 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.6 0. 0. 4134 9700 MIXED USE 75% S"'REETFRCNT acre 12.5 12128. 8805. 4134 101'AL 15218. 10681. 4136 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 156.0 2434. 1698. 4136 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.3 0. 0. 4136 TOTAL 2434. 1698. 4139 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 17.0 285. 185. 4139 182 MULTI -FAMILY du 184.0 1969. 1382. 3jun_0/10:13:24/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 10 Land Use Trips Zone Code Nacre Type Amount Person `✓chicle 4139 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.4 0. 0. 4139 TOTAL 2234. 156/. 4144 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 33.0 515. 359. 4144 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.0 0. 0. 4144 TOTAL 515. 359. 4145 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 18.8 1886. 1524. 4145 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 14.0 0. 0. 4145 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.9 923. 670. 4145 TOTAL 2809. 2194. 4147 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 13.0 203. 142. 4147 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 14.0 150. 105. 4147 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 1.1 5. 4. 4147 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.8 0. 0. 4147 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 2.6 3905. 2835. 4147 5008 OTHER COMMERCIAL (CBE) acre 0.5 634. 460. 4147 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.5 59. 43. 4147 6102 CHURCH acre 1.9 99. 76. 4147 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre 0.3 134. 99. 4147 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 3.8 3646. 2647. 4147 TOTAL 8835. 6411. 4148 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 83.0 1295. 904. 4148 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 142.0 1519. 1067. 4148 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.5 0. 0. 4148 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.4 562. 408. 4148 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.9 119. 87. 4148 6102 CHURCH acre 0.3 14. 11. 4148 6804 SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL acre 1.0 5369. 2423. 4148 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4148 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4148 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.2 188. 137. 4148 TOTAL 11186. 6220. 4149 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 613.0 9563. 6673. 4149 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 63.9 0. 0. 4149 6102 CHURCH acre 2.1. 112. 86. 4149 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 2.2 150. 98. 4149 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.9 0. 0. 4149 TOTAL 9825. 6858. 4150 1112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.7 0. 0. 4150 1114 PARKING acre 1.6 0. 0. 4150 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 2.0 935. 662. 4150 5009 OTHER COMMFRCTA: acre 0.1 8. 6. 4150 6809 OTHER SCHOOL acre 1.7 333. 275. 4150 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.1 0. 0. 4150 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREFIERONT acre 10.9 10613. 7705. 4150 TOTAL 11890. 8647. 3jun10/10:13:24/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 11 Land Use Trips ZoneCode Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4151 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 102.0 1591. 1110. 4151 102 MUL'T1-FAMILY du 295.0 3156. 2216. 4151 1409 OTHER GROUP QUARTERS acre 2.1 10. 7. 4151 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 1.2 236. 194. 4151 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 11.1 0. 0. 4151 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 3.2 1524. 1078. 4151 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 0. 0. 4151 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 2.7 2595. 1877. 4151 701_AL 9103. 6482. 4153 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 5.0 78. 54. 4153 4112 RIG[[T-OF-WAY acre 8.8 0. 0. 4153 5003 COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL acre 2.9 2466. 1745. 4153 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 27. 19. 4153 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 16.0 0. 0. 4153 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 24.2 23551. 17097. 4153 TOTAL 26121. 18916. 4155 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 10.9 0. 0. 4155 5006 AUTO COPM^_ERCIAL acre 21.2 10009. 7082. 4155 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.3 393. 286. 4155 9700 MIXED USE 15% STREETFRONT acre 0.6 587. 426. 4155 TOTAL 10989. 7793. 4164 2101 INDUSTRIAL ?ARK acre 31.1 5975. 4898. 4164 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 1.9 63. 52. 4164 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 37.8 0. 0. 4164 9101 INACTIVE [JS7 acre 5.8 0. 0. 4164 TOTAL 6038. 4950. 4166 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 40.5 0. 0. 4166 5002 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL acre 59.5 44679. 31548. 4166 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 53.7 0. 0. 4166 9700 MIXED USE 7S% STREETFRONT acre 12.2 11825. 8585. 4166 TOTAL 56504. 40132. 4169 1501 LOW-RISE HOTEL OR MOTEL acre 5.9 2005. 1236. 4168 1503 RESORT acre 4.8 i67. 473. 4168 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 41.6 4:69. 3370. 4168 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 8.4 0. 0. 4168 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 8.3 109. 769. 4168 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 26.7 0. 0. 4168 701_AL 8201. 5248. 4170 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 18.0 281. 196. 4170 2104 WAREHOUSING CR STORAGE acre 7.3 240. 197. 4170 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 17.9 0. 0. 4170 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 2.5 10. 8. 4110 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.4 679. 493. 4170 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 2.7 0. 0. 4170 TOTAL 1210. 893. 3jun10/10:13:24/Lym.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 12 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4179 101 SINGLE FAMILY d-a 29.0 452. 316. 4179 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 11.0 118. 83. 4179 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 2.2 218. 176. 4179 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.9 0. 0. 4179 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 5.7 2683. 1898. 4179 5009 OTHER CCMMERCIAL acre 4.9 630. 457. 4179 6002 LOW RISE OFFICE acre 1.9 308. 236. 4179 9700 MIXED USE 75° STREETFRONT acre 0.3 344. 250. 4179 TOTAL 4753. 3416. 4188 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 13.6 2618. 2146. 4'.88 2104 WAREHOUSING 0R STORAGE acre 0.9 30. 24. 4188 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 54.9 0. 0. 4188 4114 PARKING acre 5.1 U. 0. 4188 5007 S'IREE'='FRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.8 1161. 842. 4188 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 33.1 U. 0. 4188 TOTAL 3808. 3013. 4191 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.1 0. 0. 4191 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 3.4 436. 316. 4191 7207 MARINA acre 20.2 1128. 770. 4191 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 20.2 0. 0. 4191 TOTAL, '564. 1086. 4281 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 199.2 0. 0. 4281 TOTAL 0. 0 . 4606 2201 EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRY acre 213.8 321. 265. 4606 TOTAL 321. 265. 4615 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 96.0 1498. 1045. 4615 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 28.0 300. 210. 4615 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.0 O. 0. 4615 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.0 4615 TOTAL 1797. 1255. 4616 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 87.0 1357. 947. 4616 102 MTILTT-FAMTT,Y du 20.0 214. 150. 4616 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 6.2 0. 0. 4616 TOTAL 1571. 1097. 4617 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 8.0 125. 87. 4617 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.8 0. 0. 4617 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.7 1018. 739. 4617 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.1 12. 9. 4617 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.4 1365. 991. 4617 TOTAL 2520. 1826. 4619 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 165.0 2574. 1796. 4619 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 178.0 1905. 1337. 4618 4112 RIGHT -OF -MAY acre 13.1 C. 0. 4618 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 23. 17. 3jun10/10:13:24/tqn.pr CVSR(Chula Vista Seuthhay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 13 Land Use Trips Zone Cede Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4618 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 2.5 2466. 1790. 4619 TOTAL 6968. 4940. 4619 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 125.0 1950. 1361. 4619 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 50.0 53.5. 376. 4619 4112 RIGHT OF -WAY acre 5.2 0. 0. 4619 TOTAL 2485. 1736. 4622 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 104.0 1622. 1132. 1620 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 32.0 342. 240. 4620 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 7.4 0. 0. 4620 6102 CHURCH acre 0.2 11. 8. 4620 TOTAL 1976. 1381. 4621 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 175.0 2730. 1905. 4621 102 MCLTI-FAMILY du 184.0 1969. 1382. 4621 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 9.2 0. 0. 4621 TOTAL 4699. 3287. 4622 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 64.0 998. 697. 4622 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 42.0 449. 316. 4622 4112 HiGHT-CF-WAY acre 6.9 0. 0. 4622 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.2 256. 186. 4622 9200 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 4.0 3880. 2816. 4622 TOTAL 5583. 1014. 4623 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 5.0 78. 54. 4623 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 229.0 2450. 1720. 4623 4112 EIGHT -OF -WAY acre 12.4 0. 0. 4623 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.9 1358. 986. 4623 5008 0:HER COMMERCIAL (CBE) acre 0.5 684. 496. 4623 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.1 64. 47. 4623 TOTAL 4634. 3303. 4624 4112 RIGHT -OR -WAY acre 13.2 0. 0. 4624 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 1.6 208. 151. 4624 9700 M_XED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.6 538. 391. 4624 TOTAL 746. 542. 4625 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 1.4 137. 111. 1625 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.7 0. 0. 1625 6003 GOV'T OFFICE OR CENTER acre 0.7 785. 589. 1625 6909 OTHER SCHOOL acre 1.7 247. 286. 4625 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 1.9 1847. 1341. 4625 TOTAL 3116. 2327. 4626 101 STNGT,E FAMILY du 51.0 796. 555. 4626 102 MU?TT-FAMILY du 64.0 685. 481. 4626 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 9.1 0. 0. 4626 4114 PARKING acre 0.2 0. 0. 4626 6102 CHURCH acre 0.1 6. 5. 4626 6109 07HER DUEL' ;' SERVICE acre 0.9 365. 264. 3jun10j10:13:24/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Scuthbay)- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 14 ----- Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amcunt Person Vehicle 4626 6509 OTHER HEALTH CARE acre D.5 231. 171. 4626 7601 ACTTVF PARK acre 0.3 23. 1S. 4626 9700 MIXED USE 75% STRF,E7FROET acre 5.9 5744. 4170. 4626 TOTAL 7849. 5661. 4627 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 19.0 296. 207. 4627 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 123.0 1316. 924. 4627 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 4.0 0. 0. 1627 6109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 0.4 156. 113. 4627 9700 MTXF.D USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.1 135. 98. 4627 TOTAL 1903. 1342. 4628 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 11.0 172. 120. 4629 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 375.0 4012. 2817. 4628 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.7 0. 0. 4628 66109 OTHER PUBLIC SERVICE acre 1.7 676. 489. 4629 TOTAL 4860. 3425. 4629 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 4.1 410. 332. 4629 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.9 0. 0. 4629 9700 MIXED USE 75% STSFFTFRONT acre 0.1 130. 95. 4629 TOTAL 541. 426. 4630 4112 RIGHT CF WAY acre 14.2 0. 0. 4630 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 4.3 547. 397. 4630 9700 MIXED USE 75% STEEETFRONT acre 2.9 2.833. 2057. 4630 TOTAL 3380. 2454. 4631 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 101.0 1576. 1099. 4631 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 475.0 5082. 3568. 4631 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 13.1 0. 0. 4631 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.1 0. 0. 4631 TOTAL, 6658. 4668. 4632 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 195.0 3042. 2123. 4632 102 '9ULTI-FAMILY du 240.0 2568. 1903. 4632 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 13.3 0. 0. 4632 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 1.0 1458. 1059. 4632 9700 MIXED USE 75% STRFFTFRONT acre 0.6 541. 393. 4632 TOTAL. 7609. 5377. 4633 1501 LOW-RTSE HCTEL OR MOTEL acre 1.2 407. 251. 4633 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 0.9 89. 72. 4633 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.2 0. 0. 4633 TOTAL 495. 322. 4634 1501 LOW-RISE ECTEL OR MOTEL acre 1.6 562. 346. 4634 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 0.7 0. 0. 4634 TO"AL 562. 346. 4635 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 0.0 3. 3. 4635 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 1.9 0. 0. 3jjun10/10:13:24/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay) 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 15 Land Use 'rips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4635 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 2.9 4385. 3183. 4635 6002 LOW RISE. OFFICE acre 3.8 1353. 1037. 4635 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 2.3 0. 0. 4635 TOTAL 5741. 4223. 4636 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 17.6 3381. 2772. 4636 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 4.0 0. 0. 4636 TOTAL 3381. 2772. 4637 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 114.0 1778. 1211. 4637 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.8 0. 0. 4637 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 7.6 507. 333. 4637 TOTAL 2285. 1574. 4638 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 37.0 577. 403. 4638 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 141.0 1509. 1059. 4638 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 16.3 0. 0. 4638 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.4 49. 35. 4638 7601 ACTIVE PARK acre 62.8 4179. 2750. 4638 TOTAL 6313. 4247. 4639 2101 INDUSTRIAL PARK acre 6.4 1236. 1014. 4639 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 0.4 38. 31. 4639 2104 WAREHOUSING OR STORAGE acre 7.6 252. 206. 4639 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 8.5 0. 0. 4639 5006 AUTO COMMERCIAL acre 9.1 4320. 3057. 1639 TOTAL 5846. 4306. 4640 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 12.0 187. 131. 4640 2103 LIGHT INDUSTRY acre 3.5 346. 230. 4640 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.9 0. 0. 4640 5002 REGIONAL COMMERCIAL acre 8.0 6001. 4237. 4640 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 0.1 10. 7. 4640 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.9 0. 0. 4640 9700 NIXED USE /5% STREETFRONT acre 2.5 2439. 1770. 4640 TOTAL 8984. 6426. 4641 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 3.0 0. 0. 4641 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 16.3 24917. 17629. 4641 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 0.8 0. 0. 4641 TOTAL 24917. 17629. 4642 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 0.8 0. 0. 4642 5003 COMMUNITY CCMMERCIAL acre 14.9 12471. 8823. 4642 9102 INACTIVE USE acre 4.4 0. 0. 4642 TOTAL 12471. 8823. 4643 101 SINGLE tAMILY du 24.0 374. 261. 4643 102 MULTI -FAMILY du 133.0 1423. 999. 4643 4112 RIGHT -OF --WAY acre 2.9 0. 0. 4643 500/ STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 1.3 1934. 1404. 4643 6102 CHURCH acre 1.0 56. 43. 3jun10/10:13:24/tgm.pr CVSB(Chula Vista Southbay)-- 2030 Base trip generation and land use by zone page 16 Land Use Trips Zone Code Name Type Amount Person Vehicle 4643 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ccrc 1.0 2119. 1185. 4643 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.1 125. 91. 4643 TOTAL 6031. 3983. 4644 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 215.0 3354. 2340. 4644 102 MULTI -FAMILY d'.: 16.0 171. 12C. 4644 4112 RIGHT OF -WAY acre 8.7 0. O. 4644 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 0.3 1. 1. 4644 5007 STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 0.1 138. 100. 4644 6102 CHURCH acre 0.5 28. 21. 4644 6105 FIRE OR POLICE STATION acre 0.3 104. 77. 4644 6806 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL acre 1.0 2119. 1185. 4644 TOTAL 5915. 3845. 4645 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 20.0 312. 218. 464S 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 0.5 0. 0. 4645 6102 CHURCH acre 8.2 439. 337. 4645 TOTAL 751. 555. 4646 5004 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL acre 6.5 9878. 6989. 4646 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 0.6 616. 447. 4646 TOTAL 10494. 7436. 4648 102 SINGLE NAMILY du 8.0 125. 87. 4648 103 MOBILE HOME PARK du 178.0 1175. T19. 4648 1501 LOW-RISE HOTEL OR MOTEL acre 0.6 185. 114. 4648 4112 RIGHT OF WAY acre 6.9 0. 0. 4648 500% STREETFRONT COMMERCIAL acre 1.8 2683. 1948. 4648 9700 MIXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 2.1 2041. 1482. 4648 TOTAL 6209. 4410. 4649 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 41.0 640. 446. 4649 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 2.2 0. 0. 4649 4113 COMMUNICATION OR UTILITY acre 0.2 1. 1. 4649 9101 INACTIVE USE acre 3.7 0. 0. 4649 TOTAL 641. 447. 4650 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 99.0 1544. 1078. 4650 4112 RIGHT-OF-WAY acre 5.8 0. 0. 4650 TOTAL 1544. 1078. 4651 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 67.0 1045. 729. 4651 4112 RIGHT -OF -NAY acre 3.8 0. 0. 4651 TOTAL 1045. 729. 4652 101 SINGLE FAMILY du 1.2.0 167. 131. 4652 4112 RIGHT-CF-WAY acre 4.0 0. 0. 4652 5009 OTHER COMMERCIAL acre 1.3 166. 121. 4652 9700 51TXED USE 75% STREETFRONT acre 2.5 2463. 1789. 4652 TOTAL 2818. 2041. 3junl0/10:13:24/tan:.pr CITY OF NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE TRAFFIC IMPACT TO FREEWAY FACILITIES TECHNICAL REPORT ■ F HR&PEERS 101 Broadway, Suite 1970 San Diego, CA 92101 (619)234-3190 Ref. OCt, -0145 EHRt PEERS TRANSPORTATION CONSULTANTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Study Background and Purpose 3 1.2 Project Study Area and Scenarios 3 1.3 Report Organization 3 2.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 4 2.1 Analysis Methodology 4 2.2 Impact Significance Criteria 5 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 6 3.1 Freeway Network and Volumes 6 3.2 Freeway Performance 6 4.0 FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 8 4.1 Adopted City of National City General Plan 8 4.2 Proposed Project (Proposed Gcncral Plan Update) 8 5.0 IDENTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS 11 5.1 Comparison of Existing City of National City General Plan to Existing Conditions 12 5.2 Comparison of Proposed City of National City General Plan to Existing Conditions 14 5.3 Comparison of Proposed City of National City General Plan to Adopted City of National City General Plan 16 5.4 Mitigation of Significant impacts 17 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 2.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS 4 TABLE 2.2 CALTRANS DISTRICT 11 FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS 5 TABLE 2.3 SANTEC / ITE MEASURES OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS 5 TABLE 3.1 FREEWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING CONDITIONS 7 TABLE 4.1 FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN 9 TABLE 4.2 FREEWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN 10 TABLE 5.1 SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN VS. EXISTING CONDITIONS (Adopted Plan to Ground) 12 TABLE 5.2 SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE VS. EXISTING CONDITIONS (Proposed Plan to Ground) 14 TABLE 5.3 SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE VS. ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN 16 -tional City General Plan.1 pacts to Freeway Facilitres.Tech , 2011 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 STUDY BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The purpose of this technical report is to document potential significant traffic impacts on regional freeway facilities associated with the City of National City General Plan Update. The Circulation Element of the General Plan provides a future vision and key direction for achieving the development of a truly multi -modal transportation system serving all the citizens of the City of National City. The current Circulation Element for the City of National City was prepared in 1996 and has been the subject of various modifications over the years. The current update effort provides the opportunity to review past accomplishments and refocus efforts to effectively plan a balanced transportation system. This Element seeks to assure that the City's circulation system provides for the effective movement of people and goods in and around the City while giving strong consideration to non -single -occupant -vehicle (SOV) forms of transportation including bikes, pedestrians and transit. To achieve this, the Circulation Element utilizes a multi-modal/whole-systems approach to circulation planning. 1.2 PROJECT STUDY AREA AND SCENARIOS Regional freeway facilities (Interstate 5, Interstate 805, and State Route 54) within National City were analyzed and compared under each of the following three (3) scenarios: • Existing Conditions — This alternative includes existing (year 2010) traffic volumes on the respective freeway segments as currently constructed. • Adopted General Plan (No Project) — This scenario includes land uses and roadway network consistent with the buildout of the currently adopted City of National City General Plan. • Proposed General Plan Update (Proposed Project) — This scenario includes land uses and roadway network consistent with the proposed City of National City General Plan Update. 1.3 REPORT ORGANIZATION Following this Introduction chapter, this report is organized into the following sections: 2.0 Approach and Methodology — This chapter describes the methodologies and standards utilized to analyze traffic conditions in the regional freeway system. 3.0 Existing Conditions — This chapter provides results of the analysis of existing traffic conditions for the identified freeway facilities. 4.0 Future Traffic Conditions — This chapter describes future year buildout traffic conditions on the identified freeway facilities under both the City of National City Adopted General Plan and the City of National City Proposed General Plan Update. 5.0 Comparison Assessments — This chapter provides a comparison of traffic operations on the regional freeway facilities under the three analysis scenarios and identifies potential significant impacts associated with the proposed City of National City General Plan Update. 6.0 Summary of Findings — This chapter summarizes the analysis results included traffic impacts on the regional freeway system under the analyzed scenarios. FFN( Ri W5FORi ATED& C t•:ERS T1k15 City of National City General Plan Updf Traffic impacts to Freeway Facilities Tech January 2011 2.0 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 2.1 ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY Detailed information on the freeway segment analysis methodologies, standards, and thresholds are discussed in the following section. 2.1.1 Level of Service Definitions The concept of LOS is defined as a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and the motorist's and/or passengers' perception of operations. A LOS definition generally describes these conditions in terms of such factors as speed, travel time, freedom to maneuver, comfort, convenience, and safety. Table 2.1 describes generalized definitions of LOS in transportation systems. TABLE 2.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS LOS Category Definition of Operation A This LOS represents a completely free -flow condition, where the operation of vehicles is virtually unaffected by the presence of other vehicles and only constrained by the geometric features of the highway and by driver preferences. B This LOS represents a relatively free -flow condition, although the presence of other vehicles becomes noticeable. Average travel speeds are the same as in LOS A, but drivers have slightly less freedom to maneuver. At this LOS the influence of traffic density on operations becomes marked. The ability to maneuver within the traffic stream is clearly affected by other vehicles. D At this LOS, the ability to maneuver is notably restricted due to traffic congestion, and only minor disruptions can be absorbed without extensive queues forming and the service deteriorating. E This LOS represents operations at or near capacity. LOS E is an unstable level, with vehicles operating with minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. At LOS E, disruptions cannot be dissipated readily thus causing deterioration down to LOS F. F At this LOS, forced or breakdown of traffic flow occurs, although operations appear to be at capacity, queues form behind these breakdowns. Operations within queues are highly unstable, with vehicles experiencing brief periods of movement followed by stoppages. Source Highway Capacity Manual 2000 2.1.2 Freeway Level of Service Standards and Thresholds Freeway LOS and performance is based on procedures derived from the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 2000) (Transportation Research Board, 2000). The procedure for calculating LOS involves estimating a peak hour volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio and comparison to acceptable ranges of V/C values corresponding to the various Levels of Service, as shown in Table 2.2. The corresponding LOS represents an approximation of existing or anticipated future peak hour operating conditions in the peak direction of travel. As stated in the Caltrans' Guide for the preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, Caltrans endeavors to maintain a goal of LOS C on regional freeway facilities. However, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not always be feasible. In these circumstances, Caltrans often accepts lower LOS on facilities that are currently operating below the LOS C objective. NS POATATION rON511li N NTS Iona! City General Plan fj h;pacts to Freeway .Facilitie_ ;•'o 11 TABLE 2.2 CALTRANS DISTRICT 11 FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITIONS LOS V/C Congestion/Delay Traffic Description "A" <0.30 None Free flow. "B" 0.30-0.49 None Free to stable flow, light to moderate volumes. 0.50-0.70 0.71-0.88 None to minimal Stable flow, moderate volumes, freedom to maneuver noticeably restricted. Minimal to substantial Approaches unstable flow, heavy volumes, very limited freedom to maneuver. "E" 0.89-0.99 Significant Extremely unstable flow, maneuverability and psychological comfort extremely poor. "F" >1.00 Considerable Forced or breakdown flow. Delay measured in average travel speed (MPH). Signalized segments experience delays >60.0 seconds/vehicle. Source: 2000 Highway Capacity Manual 2.2 IMPACT SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA Caltrans utilizes the SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) in the San Diego Region as the basis for defining project impacts. In general, a significant impact would be identified when the addition of project traffic results in a Level of Service dropping from LOS D or better to substandard LOS E or F. In addition, Table 2.3 summarizes the impact significance thresholds for facilities operating at substandard LOS (LOS E or F) with and without the project. These thresholds as applied to freeway segments are based upon an acceptable increase in the VIC ratio. TABLE 2.3 SANTEC I ITE MEASURES OF SIGNIFICANT PROJECT TRAFFIC IMPACTS LOS with Project Allowable Change Due to Impact E & F (or ramp meter delays above 15 min.) Freeways Roadway Segments Intersections Ramp Metering V/C Speed (mph) VIC Speed (mph) Delay (sec) Delay (min.) 0.01 1 0.02 1 2 2 Source: SANTEC/CMP Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies (T S) in the San Diego Region A NS P010,010N CON59 City of National City General Plan Updates Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities, TeChticalReP January 2011 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS This section provides an assessment of freeway performance in terms of operating conditions and LOS under Existing Conditions. 3.1 FREEWAY NETWORK AND VOLUMES A total of seventeen (17) regional freeway segments were identified for analysis within the City of National City. The existing freeway cross -sections are consistent with current freeway lane configurations. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes on these freeway facilities were obtained / derived from Ca[trans Freeway Performance Measurement System (PeMS). 3.2 FREEWAY PERFORMANCE Table 3.1 displays existing freeway cross -sections, the existing average daily traffic volume (ADT), and the corresponding V/C ratio & LOS for the identified freeway facilities. As shown, ten (10) out of seventeen (17) analyzed freeway segments are currently operating at substandard LOS E or F under Existing conditions. FEHf: be TRANSPORTATION City of National City General Plan Updates Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities January 2011 TABLE 3.1 FREEWAY SEGMENTS LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING CONDITIONS Freeway Segment ADT Peak Hour % Peak Hour Volume Directional Split # of Lanes per Direction PHF % HV Volume (pc/hlln) V/C LOS 1-5 Northern City Limit/Division Street to 8th Street 154,400 8.5% 13,100 0.51 4 0.92 4.60% 1,900 0.79 D 8th Street to Civic Center Drive 172.100 8.5% 14,600 0.51 4 0.92 4.60% 2,100 0.88 D Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 172,100 8.5% 14,600 0.52 4 0.92 4.60% 2,200 0.92 E 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way 172,100 8.5% 14,600 0.51 5 0.92 4.60% 1,700 0.71 C Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps 151,000 8.5% 12,800 0.51 5 0.92 4.60% 1,500 0.63 C SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 121,700 8.5% 10,300 0.51 5 0.92 4.60% 1,200 0.50 C SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 149,500 8.5% 12,700 0.50 4 0.92 4.60% 1,800 0.75 D 1-805 Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue 194,500 9.0% 17,500 0.52 4 0.92 6.40% 2,600 1.08 F Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard 182,100 9.0% 16,400 0.52 5 0.92 6,40% 2,000 0.83 D East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road 165,100 9.0% 14,900 0.51 4 0.92 6.40% 2,200 0.92 E Sweetwater Road to SR-54 WB Ramps 171,900 9.0% 15,500 0.51 4 0.92 6.40% 2,300 0.96 E SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 171,900 9.0% 15,500 0.55 4 0.92 6.40% 2,500 1.04 F SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 224,500 9.0% 20,200 0.50 4 0.92 6.40% 2,900 1.21 F SR-54 1-5 to Highland Avenue 96,100 10.4% 10,000 0.52 3 0.92 6.30% 2,000 0.95 E Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps 106,900 10.4% 11,100 0.54 3 0.92 6.30% 2,300 1.10 F 1-805 SB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way 118,400 10.4% 12,300 0.50 3 0.92 6,30% 2,400 1.14 F Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit 107,700 10.4% 11,200 0.50 3 0.92 6.30% 2,200 1.05 F Note: Bold letter indicates unacceptable LOS E or F. F 1' TRANS PEERS TATYON CONSUTTANT,S Source: Fehr & Peers; January 2010 ........................ °iona! City General Plan Updates - acts to Freeway Facilities FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section describes the future year freeway performance in terms of operating conditions and LOS under buildout of the City of National City adopted General Plan and proposed General Plan Update. 4.1 ADOPTED CITY OF NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN The adopted City of National City General Plan represents the no -project condition, and includes land uses and roadway network characteristics in the City of National City consistent with the currently adopted Circulation Element. 4.1.1 Freeway Network and Volumes The future year freeway cross -sections are consistent with the SANDAG 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) "reasonably expected improvements with mobility emphasis." The average daily traffic volumes were derived from the SANDAG Series 11 Southbay III traffic model forecast for the City of National City General Plan Update (adopted General Plan scenario). 4.1.2 Freeway Performance Table 4.1 displays the future year freeway cross -sections, the 2030 forecast average daily traffic volumes, and the corresponding V/C and LOS assuming buildout of the adopted City of National City General Plan. As shown, sixteen (16) out of the seventeen (17) analyzed freeway segments would operate at substandard LOS E or F under future year buildout of the Adopted City of National City General Plan. 4.2 PROPOSED PROJECT (PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE) The proposed City of National City General Plan represents the "base plus project" condition, and includes land uses and roadway network characteristics in the City of National City consistent with the proposed Circulation Element Update. 4.2.1 Freeway Network and Volumes The future year freeway cross -sections are also consistent with the SANDAG 2030 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) "reasonably expected improvements with mobility emphasis". The average daily traffic volumes were derived from the SANDAG Series 11 South III traffic model forecast for the City of National City General Plan Update (proposed General Plan) traffic. 4.2.2 Freeway Performance Table 4.2 displays the assumed future year freeway cross -sections, the 2030 forecast average daily traffic volumes, and the corresponding V/C & LOS assuming buildout of the proposed General Plan. As shown, sixteen (16) out of the seventeen (17) analyzed freeway segments would operate at substandard LOS E or F under future year buildout of the proposed City of National City General Plan. FUIR & PLtRS iRANSPORT/MOI CONSULTANTS City of National City General Plan Update Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities January 2011 TABLE 4.1 FREEWAY SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN Freeway Segment ADT Peak o Hour % Peak Hour Volume Directional Split # of Lanes per Direction PHF % HV Volume (pclh/In) V/C LOS 1-5 Northern City Limit/Division Street to 8th Street 255,900 8.5% 21,800 0,54 4 0.92 4,60% 3,400 1.42 F 8th Street to Civic Center Drive 242,400 8.5% 20,600 0.55 4 0.92 4.60% 3,200 1.33 F Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 216,700 8.5% 18,400 0,52 4 0.92 4.60% 2,700 1.13 F 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way 234,600 8.5% 19,900 0.51 5 0.92 4.60% 2,300 0.96 E Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps 251,000 8.5% 21,300 0.52 5 0,92 4.60% 2,500 1.04 F SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 181,300 8.5% 15,400 0.51 5 0.92 4.60% 1,800 0.75 D SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 174,300 8.5% 14,800 0.56 4 0.92 4.60% 2,400 1.00 F 1-805 Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue 245,100 9.0% 22,100 0.53 4 0.92 6.40% 3.400 1,42 F Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard 254,900 9.0% 22,900 0.50 5 0.92 6.40% 2.700 1.13 F East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road 241,500 9.0% 21,700 0.51 4 0.92 6.40% 3.200 1.33 F Sweetwater Road to SR-54 WB Ramps 211,700 9.0% 19,100 0.52 4 0.92 6.40% 2.900 1.21 F SR-54 W8 Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 206,900 9.0% 18,600 0.55 4 0.92 6,40% 3.000 1.25 F SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 291,000 9.0% 26,200 0.50 4 0.92 6.40% 3,800 1.58 F SR-54 1-5 to Highland Avenue 112,300 10.4% 11,700 0.56 3 0,92 6.30% 2,500 1.19 F Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps 130,500 10.4% 13,600 0.52 3 0.92 6.30% 2,700 1.29 F 1-805 SB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way 139,200 10.4% 14,500 0.51 3 0.92 6.30% 2,900 1,38 F Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit 126,100 10.4% 13,100 0.51 3 0.92 6.30% 2,600 1.24 F Source: Fehr & Peers: January 2010 Note: Bold letter Indicates unacceptable LOS E or F. lRA NSPORTATION CRN5 City of National City General Plan Updates Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities January 2011 TABLE 4.2 FREEWAY LEVEL OF SERVICE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN Freeway Segment ADT Peak Hour % Peak Hour Volume Directional Split # of Lanes per Direction PHF % HV Volume (pclhlln) VIC LOS 1-5 Northern City Limit/Division Street to 8th Street 259,100 8.5% 22,000 0,54 4 0.92 4.60% 3,400 1.42 F 8th Street to Civic Center Drive 245,400 8.5% 20,900 0.55 4 0.92 4.60% 3,300 1.38 F Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 215,900 8.5% 18,400 0.52 4 0.92 4.60% 2,700 1.13 F 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way 233,000 8.5% 19,800 0.51 5 0.92 4.60% 2,300 0.96 E Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps 253,800 8.5% 21,600 0,51 5 0.92 4.60% 2,500 1.04 F SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 183,100 8.5% 15,600 0.51 5 0.92 4.60% 1,800 0.75 D SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 176,000 8.5% 15,000 0.56 4 0.92 4.60% 2,400 1,00 F 1-805 Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue 244,200 9.0% 22,000 0.53 4 0.92 6.40% 3,400 1.42 F Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard 253,600 9.0% 22,800 0.50 5 0.92 6.40% 2,600 1.08 F East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road 240,800 9.0% 21,700 0.51 4 0.92 6.40% 3,200 1.33 F Sweetwater Road to SR-54 WB Ramps 210,100 9.0% 18,900 0.51 4 0.92 6.40% 2,800 1.17 F SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 207,500 9.0% 18,700 0.55 4 0.92 6.40% 3,000 1.25 F SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 291,800 9.0% 26,300 0.50 4 0.92 6.40% 3,800 1.58 F SR-54 1-5 to Highland Avenue 113,900 10.4% 11,800 0.56 3 0.92 6.30% 2,600 1.24 F Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps 132.600 10.4% 13,800 0.52 3 0.92 6.30% 2,800 1.33 F 1-805 SB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way 139,700 10.4% 14,500 0.51 3 0.92 6.30% 2,900 1.38 F Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit 126.500 10.4% 13,200 0.51 3 0.92 6.30% 2,600 1,24 F Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2010 Note. Bold letter Indicates unacceptable LOS E or F. Ftii R & PEERS TRANS POBTATION i°NSU.'A NT3 City of National City General Plan Updates Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities January 2011 5.0 IDENTIFICATION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS This section documents significant impacts on the analyzed regional freeway segments that would result from buildout of the proposed City of National City General Plan Update. Utilizing the methodologies outlined in Section 2.2, the following comparisons were made for purposes of determining significant traffic impacts: • Adopted City of National City to Existing Conditions (Adopted Plan to Ground) — This comparison provides a baseline scenario indicating impacts on the freeway facilities under buildout of the currently adopted City of National City General Plan. • Proposed City of National City General Plan to Existing Conditions (Proposed Plan to Ground) — This comparison provides the basis for identifying significant impacts associated with future year buildout of the proposed City of National City General Plan Update. • Proposed City of National City General Plan to Adopted General Plan (Proposed Plan to Adopted Plan) — This comparison provides the basis for identifying new significant impacts that would result with the proposed City of National City General Plan Update. FEHR IRA4SPOR1ATO City of National City General Plart Updates -: Irattic Impacts to Freeway Facilihss January 2011 5.1 COMPARISON OF EXISTING CITY OF NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN TO EXISTING CONDITIONS Table 5.1 compares projected freeway performance under the buildout of the City of National City Adopted General Plan to Existing Conditions, and displays the resulting significant impacts. TABLE 5.1 SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN VS. EXISTING CONDITIONS (ADOPTED PLAN TO GROUND) Freeway Segment Existing Adopted GP A in VIC Significant Impact? ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS 1-5 Northern City Limit/Division Street to 8th Street 154,400 0.79 D 255,900 1.42 F 0.63 Yes 8th Street to Civic Center Drive 172,100 0.88 D 242,400 1.33 F 0.46 Yes Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 172,100 0.92 E 216,700 1.13 F 0.21 Yes 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way 172,100 0.71 C 234,600 0.96 E 0.25 Yes Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps 151,000 0.63 C 251,000 1.04 F 0.42 Yes SR 54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 121,700 0.50 C 181,300 0.75 D 0.25 No SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 149,500 0.75 D 174,300 1.00 F 0.25 Yes 1-805 Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue 194,500 1.08 F 245,100 1.42 F 0.33 Yes Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard 182,100 0.83 D 254,900 1.13 F 0.29 Yes East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road 165,100 0.92 E 241,500 1.33 F 0.42 Yes Sweetwater Road to SR 54 WB Ramps 171,900 0.96 E 211,700 1.21 F 0.25 Yes 5R-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 171,900 1.04 F 206,900 1.25 F 0.21 Yes SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 224,500 1.21 F 291,000 1.58 F 0.38 Yes SR-54 I-5 to Highland Avenue 96,100 0.95 E 112,300 1.19 F 0.24 Yes Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps 106,900 1.10 F 130,500 1.29 F 0.19 Yes I-805 SB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way 118,400 1.14 F 139,200 1.38 F 0.24 Yes Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit 107,700 1.05 F 126,100 1.24 F 0.19 Yes Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2010 Notes Bold letter indicates unacceptable LOS E or F. in V/C = The change in the volume to capacity ratio between the two scenarios. & PEERS SNANsoeara.rtO% caNswuaNrs City of National City General Plan Updates' Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities_ January 2011 As shown, the following sixteen (16) freeway segments are identified as being significantly impacted when comparing the buildout of the City of National City Adopted General Plan to Existing Conditions: • 1-5, from Northern City Limit/Division Street to 81h Street • 1-5, 8th Street to Civic Center Drive • 1-5, Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way • 1-5, Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps • 1-5, SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit • 1-805, Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue • 1-805, Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard • 1-805, East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road • 1-805, Sweetwater Road to SR-54 WB Ramps • 1-805, SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps • 1-805, SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit • SR-54, 1-5 to Highland Avenue • SR-54, Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps • SR-54, 1-805 NB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way • SR-54, Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit FEIII: & PEERS IkANSPORIA11O1 CONSOIIANTS :tiona/ City General Plan Updates° pacts to Freeway Facilities ;011 5.2 COMPARISON OF PROPOSED CITY OF NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN TO EXISTING CONDITIONS Table 5.2 compares projected freeway performance under the proposed City of National City General Plan to Existing Conditions, and displays the resulting significant impacts. TABLE 5.2 SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE VS. EXISTING CONDITIONS (PROPOSED PLAN TO GROUND) Freeway Segment Existing Proposed GP LI in V/C Significant Impact? ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS 1-5 Northern City Limit/Division Street to 8th Street 154,400 0.79 D 259,100 1.42 F 0.63 Yes 8th Street to Civic Center Drive 172,100 0.88 D 245,400 1.38 F 0.50 Yes Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 172,100 0.92 E 215,900 1.13 F 0.21 Yes 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way 172,100 0.71 C 233,000 0.96 E 0.25 Yes Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps 151,000 0.63 C 253,800 1.04 F 0.42 Yes SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 121,700 0.50 C 183,100 0.75 D 0.25 No SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 149,500 0.75 D 176,000 1.00 F 0.25 Yes 1-805 Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue 194,500 1.08 F 244,200 1.42 F 0.33 Yes Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard 182,100 0.83 D 253,600 1.08 F 0.25 Yes East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road 165,100 0.92 E 240,800 1.33 F 0.42 Yes Sweetwater Road to SR-54 WB Ramps 171,900 0.96 E 210,100 1.17 F 0.21 Yes SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 171,900 1.04 F 207,500 1.25 F 0.21 Yes SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 224,500 1.21 F 291,800 1.58 F 0.38 Yes SR-54 I-5 to Highland Avenue 96,100 0.95 E 113,900 1.24 F 0.29 Yes Highland Avenue to I-805 SB Ramps 106,900 1.10 F 132,600 1.33 F 0.24 Yes 1-805 NB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way 118,400 1.14 F 139,700 1.38 F 0.24 Yes Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit 107,700 1.05 F 126,500 1.24 F 0.19 Yes Notes: Bold letter indicates unacceptable LOS E or F. A in V/C = The change in the volume -to -capacity ratio between the two scenarios. F-i_Ifl\ 1 RAMSPORIAl1 PEERS ONS4`UANTS Source: Fehr & Peers, January 2011 City of National City General Plan U$ Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities January 2011 As shown, the following sixteen (16) freeway segments would be significantly impacted when comparing the buildout of the proposed City of National City General Plan to Existing conditions: • 1-5, from Northern City Limit/Division Street to 8th Street • 1-5, 8th Street to Civic Center Drive • 1-5, Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way • 1-5, Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps • 1-5, SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit • 1-805, Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue • 1-805, Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard • 1-805, East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road • 1-805, Sweetwater Road to SR-54 WB Ramps • 1-805, SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps • 1-805, SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit • SR-54, 1-5 to Highland Avenue • SR-54, Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps • SR-54, 1-805 NB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way • SR-54, Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit 51A1LOX C©NSUII City of National City General Plan Updates Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities January 2011 5.3 COMPARISON OF PROPOSED CITY OF NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN TO ADOPTED CITY OF NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN Table 5.3 compares projected freeway performance under the proposed City of National City General Plan to the freeway performance under the Adopted City of National City General Plan, and displays the resulting significant impacts. TABLE 5.3 SIGNIFICANT TRAFFIC IMPACTS GENERAL PLAN UPDATE VS. ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN Freeway Segment Adopted GP Proposed GP A in V/C Significant Impact? ADT V/C LOS ADT V/C LOS I-5 Northern City Limit/Division Street to 8th Street 255,900 1.42 F 259,100 1.42 F 0.00 No 8th Street to Civic Center Drive 242,400 1.33 F 245,400 1.38 F 0.04 Yes Civic Center Drive to 18th Street 216,700 1.13 F 215,900 1.13 F 0.00 No 18th Street to Mile of Cars Way 234,600 0.96 E 233,000 0.96 E 0.00 No Mile of Cars Way to SR-54 WB Ramps 251,000 1.04 F 253,800 1.04 F 0.00 No SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 181,300 0.75 D 183,100 0.75 D 0.00 No SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 174,300 1.00 F 176,000 1.00 F 0.00 No 1-805 Northern City Limit to Palm Avenue 245,100 1.42 F 244,200 1.42 F 0.00 No Palm Avenue to East Plaza Boulevard 254,900 1.13 F 253,600 1.08 F -0.04 No East Plaza Boulevard to Sweetwater Road 241,500 1.33 F 240,800 1.33 F 0.00 No Sweetwater Road to SR-54 WB Ramps 211,700 1.21 F 210,100 1.17 F -0.04 No SR-54 WB Ramps to SR-54 EB Ramps 206,900 1.25 F 207,500 1.25 F 0.00 No SR-54 EB Ramps to Southern City Limit 291,000 1.58 F 291,800 1.58 F 0.00 No SR-54 1-5 to Highland Avenue 112,300 1.19 F 113,900 1.24 F 0.05 Yes Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps 130,500 1.29 F 132,600 1.33 F 0.05 Yes 1-805 SB Ramps to Plaza Bonita Center Way 139,200 1.38 F 139,700 1.38 F 0.00 No Plaza Bonita Center Way to Eastern City Limit 126,100 1.24 F 126,500 1.24 F 0.00 No Source: Fehr & Peers January 2011 Notes: Bold letters indicate substandard LOS. A in V/C - The change in the volume to capacity ratio between the two scenarios. FLHR & PLEttS. kAk5Po0.-Allen CONSULTANTS City of National City General Plan Updates ., Traffic Impacts to Freeway Facilities January 2011 As shown, the following three (3) freeway segments would be significantly impacted based upon the comparison of the City's proposed General Plan to the currently adopted General Plan: • 1-5, 8th Street to Civic Center Drive • SR-54, 1-5 to Highland Avenue • SR-54, Highland Avenue to 1-805 SB Ramps 5.4 MITIGATION OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS Mitigation of the identified significant traffic impacts would require a variety of options from freeway segment widenings to spot improvements (adding HOV lane, manage lane, etc). As regional -serving freeways, impacts are cumulative in nature and would require regional level improvements consistent with SANDAG and Caltrans plans. �Elli. & PE Ik ANSYOGIAIION CONS11 APPENDIX M BIOLOGICAL FIELD SURVEYS CITY OF NATIONAL CITY - GENERAL PLAN UPDATE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND CEQA ANALYSIS BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION The City of National City is currently in the process of preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) to analyze the environmental impacts associated with the City's proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update project (see project description, below). In compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the EIR will provide a programmatic analysis of the environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Update. In order to adequately analyze these environmental impacts, the existing conditions within National City have been identified and described. This document summarizes the existing conditions of the biological resources of National City. The Comprehensive Land Use Update includes all incorporated areas of National City, as well as the unincorporated portion of San Diego County known as Lincoln Acres, which lies within the southeastern part of the City. This unincorporated portion is not under the jurisdiction of National City, but it has been included within for the General Plan Planning Area for planning purposes. This area will be referred to as "National City" in this document and the EIR. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Comprehensive Land Use Update project includes National City's draft General Plan update, a draft Land Use Code (Municipal Code Title 18) update, and a Climate Action Plan; amendments to the Downtown Specific Plan and Housing Element as necessary to ensure consistency with the updated General Plan; and five specific development projects as follows: Street Conversions/Community Corridors, Senior Village Expansion, Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, Kimball Park Master Plan, and El Toyon Park Master Plan. These documents will supersede the current City of National City General Plan, which was last updated in 1996, and portions of the current Municipal Code. The proposed project is intended to provide the control and regulation necessary to ensure that growth in National City occurs in an orderly fashion. HABITATS Although most of National City is fully developed with residential, commercial, industrial, and military uses, various natural areas are found scattered throughout the City. However, the majority of these have been altered from their original state through the course of adjoining development, including the channelization of many of National City's watercourses. Natural and/or undeveloped areas currently present within the City consist mainly of urban canyons, undeveloped slopes, several drainages, a portion of the Sweetwater River, Paradise Marsh, and Paradise Creek. Habitats, as designated by numerical code, follow Holland'. The habitats currently present within National City consist of the following: Urban/Developed (Holland Code 12000)/ Disturbed Habitat (Holland Code 11300) As mentioned in the Introduction, most of National City is fully developed with infrastructure, residences, businesses, offices, hospitals, schools, parks, industrial areas, landscaping, and other urban uses. All of these areas qualify as Urban/Developed (U/D) habitat and offer little to no biological resource values. Also included in this general category is Disturbed Habitat (DH), which is mostly found within the City in the form of undeveloped/vacant lots and other upland areas that are unvegetated or support weedy, ruderal vegetation. In addition, some of the residences in the City contain large backyards that are disturbed or ruderal, and these backyards also qualify as DH. Areas of DH also offer little to no biological resource values, although some of the flat, unvegetated areas of the city have the potential to support seasonal wetlands or vernal pools. Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (Holland Code 52120) National City supports several areas of Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (SCSM), ranging in condition from very disturbed/degraded to very high value. This habitat -type is restricted to the western portion of National City, in creeks and estuaries that are closely connected to the San Diego Bay. The largest, most significant area of SCSM within National City, Paradise Marsh, is located at the city's southern boundary, south of West 24th Street, west of the Interstate 5 Freeway, and east of West 32nd Street. Paradise Marsh is part of the Sweetwater National Wildlife Refuge and is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The next largest area of SCSM is found in the old course of the Sweetwater River, which is located at the city's southern boundary, to the south of West 35th Street, west of National City Boulevard, and east of 1-5. This habitat -type occurs within a slice of the Sweetwater River located east of Edgemere Drive and west of the junction of the 805 and the 54 Freeways. The western portion of Paradise Creek, which crosses the central portion of the city from northeast to southwest, beginning at Kimball Park and extending west to where the Creek is channelized under 1-5, also supports SCSM. Additional SCSM is present within a tributary to Paradise Marsh that is located south of West 30th Street, west of Hoover Avenue, and east of 1-5. The smallest area of SCSM within National City is found in a drainage that runs east of East Harbor Drive and drains into the 7`h Street Channel, north of West 8th Street. These areas of SCSM are dominated by Pickleweed (Salicornia sp.), Salty Susan (Jaumea carnosa), Desert Salt Grass (Distichlis spicata), Cordgrass (Spartina sp.), American Saltwort (Batis maritima), and Holland, R.F., 1996, Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California, State of California, Nongame-Heritage Program, 156p (amended). others. Depending on their degree of disturbance, some of the areas of SCSM are infused with non- native species. Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (Holland Code 32500) Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (DCSS) is found in several discrete patches throughout National City. Several of these patches appear to be restoration projects associated with adjoining development. The remaining patches all exhibit at least a minor degree of disturbance from edge effects caused by the surrounding urbanization. The largest, highest value area of DCSS in National City is located at the City's northeastern corner, south of the intersection of East Plaza Blvd and Paradise Valley Rd, in association with a canyon that continues east into the City of San Diego. The second largest area of DCSS is found on the western and nortH :rn slopes of Paradise Marsh, east of the old railroad tracks and south of the Marina Gateway Best Western hotel. A small patch of restored DCSS is present within the Paradise Creek Educational Park. DCSS occurs in two small patches along the western boundary of the National City Golf Course, east of Palm Avenue and east of Virginia Drive. An area of landscaped, but fairly high value, DCSS occurs at the southern boundary of the City, south of the 54 Freeway and east of the 805 Freeway. Three adjoining urban canyons located along the eastern boundary of National City and north of Alta Drive, Baker Place, and Ridgeway Drive, respectively, also support DCSS. Indicators within this habitat -type include California Sagebrush (Artemisia californica), Flat -top Buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), Laurel Sumac (Malosma laurina), California Encelia (Encelia californica), Toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia), Broom Baccharis (Baccharis sarothroides), and others, including non- native species and ornamentals that have encroached into the DCSS from adjoining development. Maritime Succulent Scrub (Holland Code 32400) The City supports several areas dominated by native vegetation that qualify as Maritime Succulent Scrub (MSS). These are all remnant patches found on slopes that were never graded during the development of the City. A slope located north of Sweetwater Road and Fairlomas Road and south of Biggs Court, Menard Street, and Kellie Court supports the largest patch of MSS in National City. One of the most biologically significant areas of MSS occurs north of Valley Road and south of the southern terminus of Alta Drive in the southeastern corner of National City. The other significant, minimally disturbed patch of MSS is present along the eastern boundary of National City, immediately southwest of the southern terminus of Ridgeway Drive and north of the northern terminus of Calle Abajo. Another, smaller patch of MSS is found immediately to the east of the southeast corner of the National City Golf Course driving range, south of Lincoln Court and north of Grove Street. This habitat -type is dominated by thickets of Coast Cholla (Opuntia prolifera), with lesser numbers of Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), Lemonadeberry (Rhus integrifolia), Fishhook Cactus (Mammillaria dioica), Flat -top Buckwheat, and other native shrubs and succulents. The different areas of MSS exhibit varying degrees of infusion with non-native species. Southern Arroyo Willow Riparian Forest (Holland Code 61320) National City supports two areas of mostly undisturbed Southern Arroyo Willow Riparian Forest (SAWRF). The largest and most significant of these areas is found in the portion of the Sweetwater River located at the southeastern corner of the City, immediately to the west and south of Plaza Bonita. The other patch of SAWRF is located south of Sweetwater Road, west of Calmoor Road, and north and east of Fuentes Court, in the form of a revegetation area for the surrounding Bonita Creek residential development. This habitat -type is dominated by mature Arroyo Willows (Salix lasio/epic) and other species of willow, with occasional non-native species, such as Mexican Fan Palm (Washingtonia robusta). Freshwater Marsh (Holland Code 52400) Mostly intact Freshwater Marsh (FWM) vegetation is also found in two areas of National City. The portion of the Sweetwater River that supports SAWRF also supports adjoining areas of FWM. The second area of FWM is present within a wetland restoration area for the Bella Bonita residential development, located north of Sweetwater Road and south and east of Via Romaya. The areas that qualify as FWM are dominated by dense stands of Cattails (Typha sp.), with minimal invasion by non-native species, such as Pampas Grass (Cortaderia sp). Disturbed Freshwater Welland (Holland Code 11200) The City supports several small areas of Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (DFWW). This habitat -type is classified as "Disturbed" due to its strong non-native element and the fact that the subject watercourses have undergone extensive human manipulation. One of these areas is located within Paradise Creek, northeast of Kimball Way and west of Highland Avenue. Another patch of DFWW is found within a drainage feature that runs immediately to the south of the Palmer Way School, north of East 16`h Street and west of Earle Drive. Another drainage feature supporting DFWW begins to the south of Lirope Street and flows parallel to Cherry Blossom Street before draining into a culvert under East 8`h Street. A drainage feature that crosses the center of the National City Golf Course in a north -south direction also supports DFWW. This habitat -type is found within a drainage features that runs through an urban canyon located east of Van Ness Avenue and Ridgeway Drive, west of Rachael Avenue, and north of Calle Abajo. The largest, most significant area of DFWW in National City is located north of Plaza Bonita Road and the Sweetwater River and south of the 54 Freeway in a large, ruderal piece of land crossed by several highly disturbed watercourses that drain into the Sweetwater River. Native species in the DFWW include Cattails (Typha sp.), Bulrush (Scirpus sp.), and occasional Willows (Salix spp). Non-native species present in this habitat -type include Giant Wild Reed (Arundo donax), Mexican Fan Palm, Canary Island Palm (Phoenix canariensis), Salt Cedar (Tamarix sp.), and others. It appears that an Arundo removal program is in progress in several of the areas listed above. This species has been cut back and treated with herbicide in these areas, but these areas must be maintained in order for Arundo to be completely eradicated. The areas characterized as DFWW could be further broken down into disturbed Southern Willow Scrub (Holland Code 63320), Freshwater Marsh (Holland Code 52400), Non -vegetated Channel (Holland Code 13200), and possibly other habitat designations. Native Grassland (Holland Code 42100) A single, disturbed, very small patch of Native Grassland (NG) is found at the eastern boundary of National City on a north -facing slope that is located north of Baker Place, northwest of the northern terminus of Calle Abajo, and southwest of Ridgeway Drive. This habitat -type is dominated by Blue-eyed Grass (Sisyrinchium helium), Stipa (Stipa sp.), and Tarplant (Hemizonia sp.), along with various non- native elements. Non-native Grassland (Holland Code 42200) Many of the undeveloped portions of National City could qualify as Non-native Grassland (NNG). This habitat -type is found in several urban canyons and vacant lots throughout the City. Patchy NNG is present in an undeveloped area bounded by East 30'h Street to the south, East 27th Street to the north, A Avenue to the west, and D Avenue to the east. A vacant lot bounded by Eta Street to the south, Bucky Lane to the north, North Highland Avenue to the west, and Soltura Lane to the east also supports NNG. Another area of NNG is located north of Paradise Valley Road, south of Bluebonnet Court, and west of Petal Drive. An additional area of NNG occurs within an urban canyon located immediately to the south of Palmer Way School, north of East 16th Street, and west of Earle Drive. This habitat -type is present along the western boundary of the National City Golf Course and in an urban canyon between Van Ness Avenue and Rachael Avenue. NNG is also found at the southeastern corner of National City, to the east and west of Plaza Bonita Center Way and south of Valley Road and Sweetwater Heights Centennial Park. The NNG in National City is indicated by Ripgut Brome (Bromus diandrus), Wild Oat (Avena sp.), Wild Radish (Raphanus sativus), Bermuda Grass (Cynodon dactylon), and other Eurasian grasses and forbs. Open Water (Holland Code 13100) As mentioned above, many of the drainages in National City have been channelized over the course of the development of the City. Watercourses that have been channelized in concrete and are unvegetated but that support running or standing water year-round qualify as Open Water (OW). These areas may be salt, brackish, or freshwater, depending on their proximity to the San Diego Bay. The larger areas of OW support aquatic vegetation and wildlife. The most significant area of this habitat -type is found within the Sweetwater River, which supports mostly OW from where it is bridged by Highland Ave, extending west to where it enters the San Diego Bay_ Open Water is also found within the 7`h Street Channel, which enters the City at its northern boundary, flowing through the U.S. Naval Station and meeting the San Diego Bay at the intersection of Cummings Road and 7'h Street. All of the areas of SCSM discussed above in the SCSM section also support OW components. Bay (Holland Code 13120) National City extends into the San Diego Bay for a short distance. This portion of the City qualifies as supporting Bay habitat, which consists of open salt water habitat supporting marine species beneath the surface of the bay. Saltpan/Mudflats (Holland Code 13300) The extreme southwestern corner of National City supports Saltpan/Mudflats (S/M). These areas consist of the modified margins of San Diego Bay where shallow tidal influence has allowed evaporative salt production (saltworks) to be established. SPECIAL STATUS SPECIES Special status plants are those listed as "Endangered", "Threatened", or "Candidate for Listing" by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), that are included in the California Native Plan Society's (CNPS) "Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants", or that are considered noteworthy by other conservation agencies, organizations, or local botanists. Special status animals are those listed as "Endangered", "Threatened", or "Candidate for Listing" by the CDFG or the USFWS, that are designated as "Watch List (WL)", "Species of Special Concern (SSC)", or "Fully Protected" by the CDFG, that are considered "Birds of Conservation Concern (BCC)" by the USFWS, or that are determined to be noteworthy by the National Audubon Society, conservation agencies and organizations, or local zoologists3. Limited biological reconnaissance fieldwork, together with a search of the California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB), which is a computerized inventory of endangered, threatened, or rare species occurrences maintained by CDFG, and the CNPS "Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants", was conducted in order to identify sensitive species previously detected or with potential to occur in the National City. For a list of the special status plant and animal species obtained by this search, see Tables 1 and 2 below. Tibor, D.P. and L.A. Vorobik, 2001, Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, 387p. California Department of Fish and Game, 2009, Special animals, Natural Diversity Data Base, State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento.z Table 1. Special Status Plant Species Known From or with the Potential to Occur in National City Potential Habitat Federal/ Species Form Type CNPS List State in National City Status Adolphia californica California Adolphia perennial deciduous shrub • DCSS • NG List 2.1 None Ambrosia chenopodiifolia San Diego Bursage Ambrosia monogyra Single -whorl Burrobrush perennial shrub • DCSS • MSS List 2.1 None perennial shrub • Dry riparian areas List 2.2 None Arnbro,!-;ia pumila Sar Diego Ambrosia perennial rhizomatous herb • NG • NNG List 16.1 USFWS Endangered Androsace elongate ssp. acute California Androsace annual herb • DCSS •NG List 4.2 None Apt.anisma blitoides Aphanisma annual herb • MSS • DCSS List 16.2 None Artemisia palmed San Diego Sagewort perennial deciduous shrub • DCSS • SAWRF List 42 None Astragalus deanei Dean's Milkvetch perennial herb • DCSS • NNG List 1B.1 None Atriplex coulteri Coulter's Saltbush perennial herb • MSS • DCSS • NG • NNG List 1B.2 None Atriplex pacifica South Coast Saltscale annual herb • MSS • DCSS List 1 B.2 None Azolla mexicana Mexican Mosquito Fern annual/perennial herb • FWM • OW List 42 None Bergerocactus emoryi Golden-spined Cereus perennial stem succulent • MSS • DCSS List 2.2 None Bloomeria clevelandii San Diego Goldenstar perennial bulbiferous herb • DCSS • NG List 1B.1 None Calandrinia breweri Brewer's Redmaid annual herb • DCSS List 42 None Calandrinia maritime Sea Kisses annual herb • MSS • DCSS List 4.2 None • NG ,"soma lewisii Lewis' Evening Primrose annual herb • MSS • DCSS List 3 None • NG Cunvo; vulus simulans Small -flowered Morning Glory annual herb • DCSS • NG List 4.2 None • NNG Cordylanthus maritimus ssp-maritimus Salt Marsh Bird's Beak annual herb hemiparasitic • SCSM List 1 B.2 USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered Der:=z;.erira conjugens Otay arplant annual herb • DCSS • NG • NNG List 1B.1 USFWS Threatened; CDFG Endangered Deir i ?rJra paniculata Paniculate Farplant annual herb •DCSS •NG List 4.2 None • NNG Dichondra occidental's Western Dichondra perennial rhizomatous herb • DCSS • NG List 4.2 None Dudleya variegata Variegated Dudleya perennial herb • DCSS • NG List 16.2 None Ericameria palmeri var. palmeri Palmer's Ericameria perennialevergreen shrub • SAWRF (margins) • DCSS List 1B.1 None Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii San Diego Button -celery annuallperennial herb • NG List 18.1 USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered Euphorbia misera Cliff Spurge shrub • MSS • DCSS List 2.2 None Ferocactus viridescens Coast Barrel Cactus perennial stern succulent • DCSS • NG List 2.1 None Frankenia palmeri Palmer's Frankenia perennial herb • SCSM Lisl2.1 None Harpagonella palmeri Palmer's Grapplinghook annual herb • DCSS • NG List 4.2 None • NNG Heterotheca sessiliflora ssp.sessiliflora Beach Golden -aster perennial herb • MSS • DCSS List 113.1 None Holocarpha virgata ssp. elongate Graceful Tarplant annual herb • DCSS • NG List 4.2 None • NNG Isocoma menziesii var. decumbens Decumbent Goldenbush perennial shrub • DCSS • NG List 1B.2 None • NNG Iva hayesiana San Diego Marsh -elder perennial herb • SAWRF • FWM List 2.2 None • DFWW Juncos acutus ssp. leopoldii Southwestern Spiny Rush perennial rhizomatous herb • SAWRF • FWM List 4.2 None • DFWW Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Coulter's Goldfields annual herb • FWM • DFWW • NNG (mesic, vernal pools) List 1B_1 None Lepidiurn virginicurn var. robinsonii Robinson's Pepper -grass annual herb • MSS • DCSS List 1 B.2 None Lotus nuttallianus Nuttall's Lotus annual herb • MSS • DCSS List 1B.1 None Lycium californicum California Box -thorn perennial shrub • MSS • DCSS List 4.2 None Microseris douglasii ssp.platycarpha Small -flowered Microseris annual herb • DCSS • NG List 4.2 None • NNG Mucronea californica California Spineflower annual herb • DCSS • NG List 4.2 None Nama stenocarputn Mud Nama annual/perennial herb • SAWRF (margins) List 2.2 None Navarretia fossalis Spreading Navarrelia annual herb • NNG (mesic) -Vernal pools List 1B_1 USFWS Threatened Navarretia prostrate Prostrate Navarretia annual herb • DCSS (mesic, vernal pools) List 1B.1 None • NG (mesic, vernal pools) Nernacaulis denudata var. denudate Coast Woolly -heads annual herb - MSS List 1B.2 None Ophioglossum californicum California Adder's -longue • NG perennial rhizomatous herb • DCSS (mesic, vernal List 4.2 None pools) Orobanche parishii ssp.brachyloba Short -lobed Broomrape perennial herb parasitic • MSS • DCSS List 4.2 None Pentachaeta aurea ssp. aurea Golden -rayed Pentachaeta annual herb Phacelia rarnosissima var.austrolitoralis South Coast Branching Phacelia perennial herb • DCSS • NG List 4.2 None • NNG • MSS • DCSS List 4.2 None Piperia cooperi Chaparral Rein Orchid perennial herb • NG • NNG List 4.2 None Pstlocarphus brevissimus var.multiflorus annual herb • DCSS (mesic, vernal List 4.2 None Delta Woolly -marbles pools) Rornneya coulteri Coulters Matilija Poppy perennial rhizomatous herb • DCSS List 4.2 None Opuntia californica var. californica Snake Cholla perennial stem succulent • MSS List 1B.1 None • DCSS Selaginella cinerascens Ashy Spike -moss rhizomatous herb • MSS • DCSS List 4.1 None • NG Senecio astephanus San Gabriel Ragwort perennial herb • MSS List 4 None Stemodia durantifolia Purple Stemodia perennial herb • DCSS (washes) Lisl2.1 None Suaeda esteroa California Seablile perennial herb • SCSM List 1B.2 USFWS Endangered Suaeda taxifolia Woolly Seablite perennial evergreen shrub - MSS • CSS List 4.2 None • SCSM Viguiera faciniata San Diego County Viguiera perennial shrub • MSS • DCSS List 4.2 None Table 2. Special Status Animal Species with the Potential to Occur in National City Species Form Potential Habitat Type in National City Federal/State Status Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk Aunophila ruficeps canescens Southern California Rufous -crowned Sparrow bird • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS • SAWRF (nesting) CDFG WL bird •DCSS Annetta pulchra pulchra Silvery Legless Lizard reptile • NG, NNG •DCSS • SAWRF, DFWW CDFG WL CDFG SSC Antrozous pallidus Pallid Bat mammal • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS •SAWRF CDFG SSC Aspidoscelis hyperythra Orange -throated Whiptail reptile • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS • SAWRF (margins) CDFG SSC Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Coastal Western Whiptail reptile • DCSS •MSS • SAWRF (margins) None Branchinecla sandiegonensis rner[ebrate • DCSS (mesic, vemal pools) USFWS iSan Diego Fairy Shrimp • NG, NNG (mesic, vernal pools) Endangered Brenta hernicla Brant bird • Bay, OW • SCSM • S/M CDFG SSC Calypte costae Costa's Hummingbird bird • DCSS None Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis San Diego Cactus Wren bird • DCSS or MSS with tall Opuntia cacti for roosting and nesting USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC Carduelis lawrencei Lawrence's Goldfinch bird - NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS • SAWRF (margins for nesting) USFWS BCC Chaetodipus californicus femoralis Dulzura Pocket Mouse mammal • NG, NNG CDFG • DCSS, MSS SSC Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Pallid San Diego Pocket Mouse mammal • NG CDFG • NNG SSC Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Western Snowy Plover bird USFWS • SCSM Threatened. BCC: • S/M (nesting) CDFG SSC Choeronycteris mexicana Mexican Long -tongued Bat mammal • DCSS CDFG •MSS SSC Chondestes grammacus Lark Sparrow bird • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS • SAWRF (margins for nesting) None Cicindela gabbii Western Tidal -flat Tiger Beetle invertebrate • SCSM • S!M None Cicindela latesignata latesignata Western Beach Tiger Beetle invertebrate • S/M None Coleonyx variegatus abbotti San Diego Banded Gecko reptile • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS None Danaus plexippus invertebrate • NG, NNG Monarch Butterfly • SAWRF /wind -protected tree groves None Dendroica petechia brewsteri Yellow Warbler bird • SAWRF, DFWW (nesting) CDFG SSC Diadophis punctatus similis reptile • DCSS, MSS San Diego Ringneck Snake • SAWRF, DFWW None Elanus leucurus bird • NG, NNG CDFG White-tailed Kite • SAWRF, DFWW (nesting) FP Empidonax trall/ii extimus Southwestem Willow Flycatcher bird • SAWRF USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered Erernophila alpestris aclia California Horned Lark bird •NG CDFG • NNG WL Eumeces skiltonianus interparietalis Coronado Skink reptile • NG, NNG • DCSS. MSS • SAWRF, DFWW CDFG SSC Falco columbarius bird • NG, NNG CDFG Merlin - SCSM (wintering) WL Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern bird • Bay, OW, SCSM • FWM USFWS • S/M (nesting colony located on dikes of saltworks BCC at south end of San Diego Bay) Icferia Wrens Yellow -breasted Chat bird • SAWRF, DFWW (nesting) CDFG SSC Lanius ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike bird • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS • SAWRF USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC Latera/lus jamaicensis coturniculus California Black Rail bird • FWM • SCSM • Bay USFWS BCC; CDFG Threatened, FP Neotoma lepida intermedia mammal • DCSS CDFG San Diego Desert Woodrat • SAWRF, DFWW SSC Onychomys torridus ramona Southern Grasshopper Mouse Pandion haliaetus Osprey mammal • NG, NNG CDFG • DCSS, MSS SSC bird • Bay, OW CDFG WL Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi Belding's savannah sparrow bird •SCSM CDFG • S/M Endangered Picoide: Nuttalit'• oedpecker bird • SAWRF •DFWW None Poliop ii rnica californica California Grnatcatcher bird USFWS • DCSS Threatened; • MSS CDFG SSC Rallus longi saris Ievipes Lighl-looted dapper Rail bird • SCSM USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP SilIvacJ.a Irua.rlepis virgultea Coast Patch -nosed Snake Scaphiopu . hammondii Westeui Sp-dcfoot Toad reptile • DCSS CDFG • MSS SSC amphibian • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS • SAWRF, FWM, DFWW, vernal pools CDFG SSC Selasphonrs sasin Allen's Hummingbird Sterna forsteri Forster's Tern bird • NG, NNG • DCSS, MSS • SAWRF, FWM, DFWW None bird • Bay, OW, SCSM • FWM • S/M (nesting colony located on dikes of saltworks at south end of San Diego Bay) None Stern'a ant darum browni California I. east Tern bird • SCSM USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP Tha!asarcus Oegans Elegant Terr: • Bay, OW, SCSM bird • S/M (nesting colony located on dikes of saltworks at south end of San Diego Bay) USFWS BCC; CDFG WL Thamnophis hammondii Two -striped Garter Snake Vireo bellii pusillus Least Bell's Vireo reptile • SAWRF • FWM • DFWW CDFG SSC bird • SAWRF USFWS Endangered, BCC; CDFG Endangered WETLANDS National City supports jurisdictional wetlands regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE)", the CDFG5, and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). All of the following habitat -types would fall under the jurisdiction of at least one of these agencies: SCSM, SAWRF, FWM, DFWW, OW, Bay, and Saltpan/Mudflats. LOCAL POLICIES, ORDINANCES, AND ADOPTED PLANS National City's current General Plan contains policies and implementation guidelines regarding Conservation and Open Space that are intended to protect biological resources within the City. This includes the designation of three of the most biologically sensitive areas of the City as Open Space Reserves. In addition, all areas of the City located within the coastal zone are subject to the development standards and specific requirements of the Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan (LCP), which contains a Marsh Preservation Policy designed to protect biological resources associated with Paradise Marsh, Bannister Marsh, and the Sweetwater River. The Local Coastal Program Implementation document is a supplement to the Land Use Code that applies the provisions of the LCP to lands within the coastal zone. The City's current Land Use Code also contains policies regarding the protection of biological resources, such as restrictions on land uses within Open Space Reserves and other measures. National City is not a participant in California's Natural Community Conservation Planning program and is not subject to the requirements of any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. IMPACT ANALYSIS The EIR will evaluate the projected build -out of the Comprehensive Land Use Update in the 2030 horizon year, consistent with CEQA requirements that an EIR evaluate the "reasonably foreseeable" direct and indirect impacts of a proposed project. The EIR will review potential environmental impacts associated with the adoption and implementation of the proposed project, including impacts to biological resources, and determine corresponding mitigation measures, as necessary. This document is not intended to provide a detailed analysis of impacts to biological resources associated with specific projects under the Comprehensive Land Use Update, as these specific projects will be subject to project -level environmental review. Rather, the purpose of this document is to provide an overview of potentially "significant" impacts to biological resources associated with the adoption of the Code of Federal Regulations, 2005, Title 40, Protection of Environment, Part 232.2, Definitions. 5 Cowardin, L.M., et. al., 1979, Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington D.C. Comprehensive Land Use Update, based on the biological resources that are known to currently be present within National City, and to provide an overview of potential mitigation measures. Specific impacts to biological resources identified in connection with three of the five specific development projects (the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan, Kimball Park Master Plan, and El Toyon Park Master Plan) are discussed in the following documents, respectively: "A Biological Resources Survey Report for the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan" (Scheidt, 2010), "A Biological Resources Survey Report for the Kimball Park Concept Plan" (Scheidt, 2010), and "A Biological Resources Survey Report for the El Toyon Park Concept Plan" (Scheidt, 2010). Subsequent projects will also be reviewed by the City for consistency with the proposed General Plan update, Land Use Code, Municipal Code, and Climate Action Plan, and adequate project -level environmental review will be conducted as required by CEQA. This will include analyses of potential impacts to biological resources and recommendations for suitable mitigation. Impacts to biological resources are assessed as being either "significant" or "less than significant", as defined by CEQA. The determination of impact significance is based on one or all of the following criteria6: • a substantial effect on a rare or endangered species of plant or animal or habitat of that species, • a substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, • a substantial reduction of habitat for fish, wildlife, or plants, • a conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, • a conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Impacts to biological resources may be direct or indirect. Direct impacts result from the actual removal of habitat, plants, and animals from the site through grading, brushing, clearing, and construction. These direct impacts are considered permanent, because they result in an irreversible conversion of habitats to developed areas. Indirect impacts also affect habitats, plants, and/or animals residing on or near the project site. These are not the direct result of grading or development. Examples of indirect impacts include introduction of exotic species that may crowd out or compete with native species, human or pet intrusions into natural areas, lighting, traffic, and noise. Indirect impacts are often called "edge effects". Any impacts to sensitive habitats would be considered "significant" and would require suitable mitigation. Sensitive habitats are those that are rare, depleted, or that support significant populations of sensitive species. The habitats found within National City that would qualify as sensitive include the following: • Southern Coastal Salt Marsh • Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub California Code of Regulations, 2009, as amended, Title 14, Natural Resources, Division 6, Resources Agency, Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act • Maritime Succulent Scrub • Southern Arroyo Willow Riparian Forest • Freshwater Marsh • Disturbed Freshwater Wetland • Native Grassland • Open Water • Bay • Saltpan/Mudfiats • Non-native Grassland may also be considered sensitive based on its value for raptor foraging, although this habitat is generally not considered sensitive in and of itself Impacts to special status species, particularly those listed as "Endangered", 'Threatened", or "Candidate for Listing" by the CDFG and/or the USFWS, would be considered "significant" and would require mitigation. Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands or waters would be considered "significant" and would require mitigation. Conflicts with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance, would be considered "significant" and would require mitigation. Conflicts with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan would be considered "significant" and would require mitigation. However, as discussed above, National City is not subject to the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, this guideline does not apply to the Comprehensive Land Use Update project. MITIGATION The Wildlife Agencies (CDFG, USFWS) generally recommend that impacts to sensitive habitats be minimized whenever possible. Mitigation for unavoidable impacts is generally provided via on or offsite habitat preservation at a 1-to-1 ratio or higher. Mitigation ratios depend on the relative sensitivity of the impacted habitat and would be negotiated between the City and the Wildlife Agencies. In the case of the EIR for the Comprehensive Land Use Update, the CDFG has recommended that onsite habitat restoration or enhancement be emphasized as mitigation for habitat impacts, with offsite mitigation via habitat restoration and/or acquisition and preservation in perpetuity to be considered if onsite mitigation would not be biologically viable. On or offsite habitat preservation may require the preparation of a Habitat Management Plan (HMP) which would designate a habitat manager and specify provisions intended to maintain the viability of the preserved habitat in perpetuity. Any proposed impacts to state or federally listed species would require that the City obtain "take authorization" from the CDFG and/or USFWS, pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act and/or the Federal Endangered Species Act. Securing a permit authorizing the "take" of a listed species (an Incidental Take Permit) would require consultation with the Wildlife Agencies. Prior to issuing an Incidental Take Permit, the Wildlife Agencies would require that specific mitigation measures be identified regarding the listed species to be impacted. Mitigation measures could include the preservation of on or offsite habitat known to support the listed species, restoration of on or offsite habitat with the potential to support the listed species, seasonal restrictions on construction, measures to avoid indirect impacts, and others. Impacts to sensitive species that are not state or federally listed but are considered otherwise sensitive may or may not require "species specific" mitigation. Impacts to these species are generally mitigated for via the preservation of on or offsite habitat with the potential to support these species, although "species specific" mitigation is sometimes required, particularly when extensive impacts to native species are anticipated. The Regulatory Agencies (CDFG, RWQCB, ACOE) recommend that impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and "waters" be avoided whenever feasible, and that biological buffers and wetland setbacks be put into place to protect existing wetlands. In the case of the EIR for the Comprehensive Land Use Update, the CDFG has recommended that wetland buffers be put into place along the Paradise Creek corridor. Unavoidable impacts to wetlands and "waters" must comply with the "no net Toss" policy, which means that proposed mitigation must ensure that there be no net loss of wetland habitat values or acreages. The Regulatory Agencies generally require that wetland impacts be mitigated for at between a 1-to-1 and a 3- to-1 ratio, depending on the nature of the wetland being impacted (i.e., degree of disturbance, habitat - type, wetland functions and values provided, etc). In order to ensure no net loss, at least 1-to-1 of the applicable mitigation ratio must consist of wetlands creation. Any remaining mitigation may generally consist of wetlands restoration and/or enhancement. Wetlands creation, restoration, and/or enhancement activities require the preparation and implementation of a Regulatory Agency -approved Revegetation Plan. Impacts to jurisdictional wetlands and "waters" also generally require the securement of various Regulatory Agency permits. These would include Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits from the ACOE and RWQCB, respectively, and a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such permits are not required. Seasonal restrictions on development are generally required by the Wildlife Agencies order to ensure compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code. In the case of the EIR for the Comprehensive Land Use Update, the CDFG recommends that the removal of vegetation and construction occur outside of the avian breeding season, defined as from 1 February through 1 September of each year. If these activities are necessary during the bird breeding season, a qualified biologist should conduct a nesting bird survey within three days prior to the initiation of work in the area to ensure that no nesting birds would be impacted by the project. If an active nest is identified, a buffer should be established between the construction activities and the nest so that nesting activities are not interrupted. The buffer should be a minimum width of 300 feet (500 for raptors), should be delineated by temporary fencing, and should remain in place as long as construction is occurring or until the nest is no longer active. Because the Comprehensive Land Use Update is an update of the General Plan, Land Use Code, and associated documents, changes to local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources could occur, based on differences between past and current biological resource values within the City, the enactment of additional environmental regulations at the state or federal level, etc. However, it is anticipated that all existing biological resources within the City will continue to receive the same or greater level of protection under the Comprehensive Land Use Update as under the current General Plan, Land Use Code, LCP, etc. This will likely be necessary to ensure that the Comprehensive Land Use Update complies with all relevant state and federal environmental regulations, such as the California Coastal Act, the California and Federal Endangered Species Acts, and many others. Should a local policy and/or ordinance protecting biological resources not be included in the Comprehensive Land Use Update, the Regulatory Agencies and/or the Wildlife Agencies will likely recommend that a new policy and/or ordinance providing equal or greater protection be included in place of the policy and/or ordinance that is being eliminated_ A BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR THE LAS PALMAS PARK AND FACILITIES VISION CONCEPT PLAN CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALIFORNIA Prepared for DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT c/o Ms. Brooke Peterson, Senior Associate 5865 Mt. Alifan Drive San Diego, CA 92111 Prepared by Vincent N. Scheidt Biological Consultant 3158 Occidental Street San Diego, CA 92122 (858) 457-3873 Updated July 2010 April 2010 Vincent N. Scheidt, MA Certified Biological Consultant INTRODUCTION This report addresses biological resources, project impacts, and CEQA compatibility for the proposed Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan (hereafter "Las Palmas Park project"). The subject project proposes the re -development of portions of the existing Las Palmas Park, located in National City, California. The subject property totals approximately 82 acres, of which approximately 52 acres will be subject to re -development. The Las Palmas Park project site is located south of East 18`h Street, west of the 805 Freeway. and north of East 30th Street/Sweetwater Road in the Olivewood neighborhood of the City of National City, California (Figure 1). PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The Las Palmas Park project proposes the re -development of approximately 40 acres of the existing National City Golf Course and adjoining lands with community gardens, additional recreation facilities, public gathering spaces, future commercial development, and natural open space. The existing Las Palmas Elementary School, International Community Foundation, and Las Palmas Park recreational facilities will remain onsite, although they may be subject to minor improvements (Figure 4). The Las Palmas Park project site consists of the National City Golf Course, which runs down the center of the site, Las Palmas Elementary School, which is located at the northeastern corner of the site, the Las Palmas Park recreational facilities, which are present immediately to the south of Las Palmas Elementary School, the International Community Foundation (Walton House), which is located near the southwest corner of the site, the Butterfly Garden, found near the northwest corner of the site, and undeveloped areas along the eastern and western site boundaries (Figure 2). The National City Golf Course slopes gently to the south, with steeper east and west -facing slopes along its western and eastern boundaries, respectively. The remainder of the site is mostly flat. The project site is completely surrounded by residential and commercial development; thus, it may be characterized as an "infill" project. PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of this study was to inventory the property with respect to biological resources, identify and map the onsite habitats, and present a discussion of rare, endangered, threatened, or otherwise sensitive plants or animals that could occur onsite. These data have been used to assess the site's biological resource values. This analysis allows a determination of project -related direct and indirect impacts, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and mitigation, if appropriate and necessary. 2 The property supports sensitive upland and wetland vegetation; impacts to these habitats will result in significant, measurable losses of biological resource values, necessitating mitigation, pursuant to CEQA. METHODS Biology field surveys of the Las Palmas Park project site were completed by the author and Julia Groebner, Associate Biologist, on 11 November 2009, 14 December 2009, 15 January 2010, and 2 March 2010. Weather conditions were conducive to field surveying on these dates, with overcast to clear skies, temperatures in the 60`S and low 70`t;, and no appre ciable wind. All accessible areas of the site were examined, and all plants, animals, and habitats encountered were inventoried in the field. Inaccessible areas, including certain slopes and areas where golf was being played, were surveyed with binoculars and by reviewing recent aerial photos of the site. The limits of each habitat -type were mapped in the field utilizing an aerial photograph of the property (Figure 3). All plants and animals identified in association with the site are listed in Table 1 at the end of this report. Floral nomenclature used in this letter follows Munz' and others. Plant communities, as designated by numerical code, follow Holland2. Wildlife observations were made opportunistically. Binoculars were used to aid in observations and all wildlife species detected were noted. Animal nomenclature used in this report is taken from Stebbins3 for reptiles and amphibians, Peterson4 for birds, and Jameson, et. a/5 and Burt, et. al3 for mammals. RESULTS Most of the Las Palmas Park project site supports development and associated landscaping. However, some areas of native or naturalized habitat still remain on the site, including Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub, Non-native Grassland, and Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (Figure 3). Urban/Developed (Holland Code 12000) — 62.1 acres The majority of the Las Palmas Park project site is already developed with the National City Golf Course, Munz, P.A., 1974, A flora of Southern California, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1086p. 2 Holland, R.F., 1996, Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California, State of California, Nongame-Heritage Program, 156p (amended). Stebbins, R. C., 1985, A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 336p a Peterson, R.T., 1966, A field guide to western birds, Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966, 366p. 5 Jameson, E.W. and H.J. Peeters, 1988, California mammals, California Natural History Guides: 52, University of California Press, Berkeley. 6 Burt, W.N. and R.P. Grossenheider, A field guide to the mammals, Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966, 289p. 3 Las Palmas Elementary School, the International Community Foundation, which is housed in the historic Walton House, and existing Las Palmas Park recreation facilities, including a baseball diamond, two tennis courts, a swimming pool, and parking lots. All of these areas qualify as Urban/Developed (U/D). This habitat -type also completely surrounds the project site. Areas mapped as U/D are of little to no biological resource value. Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (Holland Code 32500) — 1.2 acres Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub (CSS) is found in several patches along the western side of the project site. These patches vary in their degree of disturbance, with the patch of CSS in the Butterfly Garden near the northwest corner of the site being very disturbed and the patch of CSS near the center of the site being mostly intact. The CSS in the Butterfly Garden is indicated by native species, such as Flat -top Buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), White Sage (Salvia apiana), Black Sage (S. mellifera), and California Encelia (Encelia californica), with large numbers of non -natives, including Acacia (Acacia sp.), Sea Lavender (Limonium sp.), and Wild Anise (Foeniculum vulgare). The remaining patches of CSS are dominated by California Sagebrush (Artemisia californica), Coast Cholla (Opuntia prolifera), California Encelia, San Diego County Viguiera (Viguiera laciniata), Deerweed (Lotus scoparius), Blue Dicks (Dichelostemma pulchellum), and occasional non -natives. The CSS onsite is of low to moderate biological resource value, based on its degree of disturbance and its isolation from larger areas of native habitat. However, the CSS in the Butterfly Garden has high restoration potential. Non-native Grassland (Holland Code 42200) — 9.3 acres Non-native Grassland (NNG) is also found in a patchy distribution along the western and eastern property boundaries. This habitat -type is indicated by a thatch of non-native grasses and forbs, including Ripgut Brome (Bromus diandrus), Perennial Mustard (Brassica geniculata), and others. Some areas of NNG support scattered large shrubs and small trees, including Lemonadeberry (Rhos integrifolia), European Olive (Olea europa), Peruvian Peppertree (Schinus molle), and Toyon (Heteromeles arbutifolia). The biological resource value of NNG is low. Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (Holland Code 11200) — 0.8 acre A drainage feature begins near the center of the site and flows south across the property, exiting at the southern boundary and eventually draining into the Sweetwater River. The northern portion of the drainage supports Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (DFWW). This segment of the drainage is densely vegetated with non-native species, including Giant Wild Reed (Arundo donax), Castor Bean (Ricinus communis), Sow Thistle (Sonchus oleraceus), and other weeds and noxious invasive hydrophytes. The biological resource value of the DFWW is currently low, although this habitat has high restoration potential. This habitat -type is associated with a jurisdictional wetland and waters of the state/U.S. Non-native Vegetation (Holland Code 11000) — 8.5 acres Non-native Vegetation (NNV) is present along the fringes of the golf course in areas that support dense landscaping associated with the golf course or with adjoining homes. These areas are dominated by 4 Acacia, Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus spp.), and other horticultural species. The areas mapped as NNV are of low biological resource value. Non -vegetated Channel (Holland Code 13200) — 0.1 acre The southerly portions of the onsite drainage qualify as Non -vegetated Channel (NVC). The NVC consists of two discrete segments of the drainage that support an open, sandy channel with well-defined bed and bank. The biological resource value of the NVC is low. This habitat -type is associated with waters of the state/U.S. Plants Sixty-three plant species were detected during the field surveys of this site. The plants observed on the Las Palmas Park project site typify the diversity normally found in annual grassland, sage scrub, disturbed wetland, and developed habitats in this part of San Diego County. A complete list of the plants detected, listed alphabetically, can be found in Table 1, attached. This list would be expected to represent at least 80 percent of the naturalized plants occurring on this property. The balance (mostly ephemeral annuals and some perennials in low numbers) would be detectable in the summer or fall months. Animals A variety of animals were observed using the project site. These are generally common species, abundant in the site's general vicinity. Additional common animal species certainly occur onsite, on at least an occasional basis, but were not directly observed during the field surveys. Eighteen species were detected during the field survey. Animals observed onsite are listed in Table 1, attached. SENSITIVE RESOURCES Sensitive Vegetation Communities Vegetation communities (habitats) are generally considered "sensitive" if; (a) they are considered rare within the region by local experts, (b) they are known to support sensitive animal or plant species; and/or (c) they are known to serve as important wildlife corridors. These sensitive habitats are typically depleted throughout their known ranges, or are highly localized and/or fragmented. The CSS, DFWW, and NVC on the Las Palmas Park project site are considered sensitive in that impacts to these habitats are regulated by the City pursuant to CEQA and by various state and federal agencies as jurisdictional lands. In terms of biological resource values, the habitat quality of the CSS, DFWW, and NVC is limited by their small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation. 5 Sensitive Plants Two sensitive plant species were observed on the Las Palmas Park project site during the field surveys. These are California Box -thorn and San Diego County Viguiera, which are discussed in more detail below. Sensitive plants are those listed as "Rare", "Endangered", "Threatened", "of Special Concern", or otherwise considered noteworthy by California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Native Plant Society (CNPS), or other conservation agencies, or- ganizations, or local botanists'. California Box -thorn Lycium californicum Listing: CNPS List 4.2 County status: San Diego County Sensitive Plant List, Group D (DPLU, 2006) Federal/State status: none Distribution: This species is found in Santa Barbara, Ventura, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Orange, San Diego, and Imperial Counties, the Channel Islands, and northern Baja California, Mexico Habitat: Occurs in coastal scrub and coastal bluff scrub below 150 meters elevation Status on Site: A single specimen of California Box -thorn was observed onsite near the central western property boundary, in association with a small patch of CSS. Other specimens may be present in inaccessible areas. In all cases, this species would be associated with remnant patches of CSS. San Diego County Viguiera Viguiera laciniata Listing: CNPS List 4.2 County status: San Diego County Sensitive Plant List, Group D (DPLU, 2006) Federal/State status: none Distribution: This distinctive species occurs from about Mission Valley in central San Diego County south to adjacent areas in northern Baja California along the coast and in foothill areas. Reported localities in San Diego County include Mission Valley, La Mesa, El Cajon, Portrero, Dehesa, Otay, and Tecate. Many populations are threatened by development, although it remains common where it occurs. Also found in Orange County and in other areas where it has been used in hydroseeding. Habitat: Occurs in coastal sage scrub, maritime scrub, and xeric chaparral, occasionally as a co -dominant Status on Site: San Diego County Viguiera is occasional onsite in the CSS. Numerous additional sensitive plants are known from the general vicinity of the property (Table 3). Due to the developed nature most of the site, the degree of disturbance of the native habitats onsite, and their isolation from additional areas of native habitat, no highly sensitive plant species or significant populations of sensitive species are anticipated to occur onsite. ' Tibor, D.P. and L.A. Vorobik, 2001, Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, 387p. 6 Sensitive Animals No sensitive animal species were detected onsite during the field surveys. Sensitive animals are those listed as "Rare", "Endangered", "Threatened", "of Special Concern" or otherwise noteworthy by the CDFG, the USFWS, the National Audubon Society, or other conservation agencies, organizations, or local zoo - log ists8. Numerous sensitive animals are known from the general vicinity of the property (Table 4). Some wide- ranging sensitive animals may occur onsite, at least on an occasional basis. This could include species of uncommon reptiles, such as Orange -throated Whiptail (Aspidoscelis hyperythra) and Coronado Skink (Eumeces skiltonianus interparietalis). Sensitive birds known from the area include wide-ranging raptors, such as Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii), Red -shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus), and others. Several species of sensitive mammals are also known from the vicinity, including various wide-ranging bats and other small species. However, due to the developed nature of most of the site, the degree of disturbance to the onsite native habitats, and their isolation from additional areas of native habitat, no highly sensitive animal species or significant populations of sensitive species are anticipated to occur onsite. Two sensitive birds known from the vicinity that could occur onsite are the federally -listed "Threatened" California Gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) and San Diego Cactus Wren (Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis). Both species occur in habitat similar to that found onsite, although the patch size of the habitat available for California Gnatcatcher is very small. San Diego Cactus Wren could occur in some of the larger stands of Coast Cholla that are found in association with the onsite CSS. Both species are known to occur in various areas of National City. Wetlands The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), CDFG, and California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) all take jurisdiction over areas that qualify under their definitions of wetlands and "waters". In many cases, the boundaries of these jurisdictional lands coincide. The current definitions utilized by these agencies (collectively "Resource Agencies") with respect to wetlands regulation are as follows: Federal Wetlands Definitions The federal regulations that implement Section 404 of the CWA, which was enacted in 1972, define "wetlands" as follows9: e California Department of Fish and Game, 2009, Special animals, Natural Diversity Data Base, State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento. 9 Code of Federal Regulations, 2005, Title 40, Protection of Environment, Part 232.2, Definitions. 7 "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water (hydrology) at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation (hydrophytes) typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions (hydric soils). Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." Federal jurisdictional wetlands that are regulated by the ACOE under Section 404 of the CWA must exhibit all three of the above characteristics: hydrology, hydrophytes, and hydric soils70. Areas that may function as wetlands ecologically, but exhibit one or two of the three characteristics, do not currently qualify as federal jurisdictional wetlands, thus activities in these wetlands are not regulated under Section 404. The ACOE also regulates the discharge of dredge and/or fill material into "waters of the United States". The term "waters of the United States" is defined by Corps regulations as": 1) All waters that are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; 2) All interstate waters including interstate wetlands; 3) All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters: (i) which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; or (ii) from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce; or (iii) which are used or could be used for industrial purpose by industries in interstate commerce; 4) All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under the definition; 5) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (a)(1)-(4) of this section; 6) The territorial seas; 7) Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in paragraphs (a)(1)-(6) of this section. The ACOE also takes jurisdiction in non -tidal waters when wetlands are not present according to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). This is defined as: "...that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of 10 Environmental Laboratory, 1987, Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington D.C. Code of Federal Regulations, 2005, Title 40, Protection of Environment, Part 2322, Definitions. 8 terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas." State Wetland Definitions According to the definition used by the CDFGt2, wetlands are "lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface, or the land is covered by shallow water, " and they exist where any one of the following conditions are present: A) Predominantly undrained hydric soils (soils with low concentrations of oxygen in the upper layers during the growing season); B) a predominance, at least periodically, of hydrophytic plants (plants that have adapted to the low availability of oxygen and others stresses in saturated soils); C) a nonsoil substrate (such as a rocky shore) that is saturated with water or covered by shallow water each year at some point during the growing season. California's version of CWA is the Porter -Cologne Act, which establishes the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCB) to oversee use and protection of the "waters of the state". In California, all surface waters as well as groundwater are considered "waters of the state". As mentioned above, a drainage feature begins near the center of the site and flows to the south, exiting the site at its southern boundary. Portions of the onsite drainage that are confined to a well-defined channel support DFWW and NVC. There is also a section of the drainage that is not channelized, where water sheet flows across the golf course, creating a wet, boggy area with large patches of sand. This area is within the historic floodplain of the adjoining creek. The segments of the drainage that are mapped as DFWW and NVC likely qualify as state (CDFG) and federal (ACOE) "waters". The vegetated portion of the drainage may also qualify as state and federal wetlands. Although it does not currently exhibit well-defined bed and bank, the section of the drainage that is not channelized may also qualify as state and federal "waters", as it is clear that this area carries flow in that it connects the more well-defined segments of the drainage. 12 Cowardin, L.M., et. al., 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington D.C. 9 IMPACTS Impacts to biological resources associated with the Las Palmas Park project are assessed as being either "significant" or "less than significant", as defined by CEQA. The determination of impact significance is based on one or all of the following criteria": • a substantial effect on a rare or endangered species of plant or animal or habitat of that species, or; • a substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or; a substantial reduction of habitat for fish, wildlife, or plants, or; • a conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, or; • a conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Anticipated impacts to habitats were calculated by determining the acreage of each habitat affected by the proposed site re -development. These are summarized in Table 2. Measurable direct impacts would result from the development of the Las Palmas Park project site. Direct impacts result from the actual removal of habitat, plants, and animals from the site through grading, brushing, clearing, construction, etc. These direct impacts are considered permanent because they result in a conversion of habitats to development. Indirect impacts also affect habitats, plants, and/or animals residing on or near the project site. These are not the direct result of grading or development. Examples of indirect impacts include introduction of exotic species, human or pet intrusions into natural areas, lighting, traffic, and noise. Indirect impacts are often called "edge effects". National City is not subject to the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, this guideline does not apply to the Las Palmas Park project. The majority of National City's local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources concern lands designated as Open Space Reserves and/or biological resources associated with Paradise Marsh, Bannister Marsh, and the Sweetwater River. Because no such lands are found onsite, the Las Palmas Park project is not anticipated to conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. 13 California Code of Regulations, 2009, as amended, Title 14, Natural Resources, Division 6, Resources Agency, Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act 10 Direct Impacts The following direct impacts are anticipated: (1) Up to 1.2 acres of CSS could be impacted as a result of site re -development. The loss of this vegetation is considered significant, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level that is "less than significant". (2) Up to 0.8 acre of DFWW could be impacted as a result of site re -development. The loss of this vegetation is considered significant, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation for this Toss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level that is "less than significant". (3) Up to 0.1 acre of NVC could be impacted as a result of site re -development. The loss of this resource is considered significant, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level that is "less than significant". (4) Up to 9.3 acres of NNG could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered Tess than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. (5) Up to 8.5 acres of NNV could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered Tess than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. (6) Up to 31.8 acres of U/D could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered Tess than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. Direct impacts associated with the subject project are presented in tabular format in Table 2. Indirect Impacts Due to the site's high amount of human use and the fact that it is completely surrounded by development, all of the natural/naturalized habitats on the project site are already subject to edge effects. Therefore, any additional edge effects resulting from project implementation are considered less than significant. MITIGATION Implementation of the Las Palmas Park project will result in a direct loss of sensitive habitat and possibly sensitive species, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation is thus required to ensure there be no loss of sensitive habitat values or degradation of significant natural areas as a result of site development. 11 Impacts to CSS generally require mitigation at a 2-to-1 ratio. Therefore, impacts to 1.2 acres of CSS would require 2.4 acres of mitigation. This mitigation could occur onsite, via habitat creation and restoration in the Butterfly Garden and/or other areas of the site. In order for onsite habitat creation and restoration to be acceptable as CSS mitigation, these activities would need to occur pursuant to a City and Wildlife Agency (CDFG, USFWS) approved Revegetation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur offsite, via the securement of 2.4 acre -credits of CSS in an approved mitigation bank. It should be noted that, due to the disturbed nature of much of the onsite CSS, a lower mitigation ratio, such as 1.5:1, may be acceptable to the City and Wildlife Agencies as providing adequate mitigation for CSS impacts. Because the site supports habitat that is theoretically suitable for the federally -listed California Gnatcatcher, it may be necessary to obtain "take" authorization from the USFWS if this species is present on the project site. In order to determine presence/absence, protocol surveys of suitable areas of habitat (CSS) onsite are recommended. These must be completed by an approved biologist in possession of a Section 10(a) Recovery Permit for this species. The survey data are generally considered accurate for one year. Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as DFWW and NVC, generally require mitigation at a 3-to-1 ratio. At least 1-to-1 of this typically must consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2-to-1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.8 acre of DFWW would require 2.4 acres of mitigation and impacts to 0.1 acre of NVC would require 0.3 acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur onsite, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the onsite drainage. In order for these activities to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur offsite, via the securement of 2.4 acre -credits of FWW and 0.3 acre -credits of NVC in an approved mitigation bank. Because the project may impact state wetlands and state and federal "waters", it may be necessary to obtain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project approval. To that end, it is recommended that the applicant provide to the Director, Planning and Building Department proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the Director that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. In order to ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 300 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from 15 February to 31 August of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds or raptors. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal 12 activities during the songbird breeding season, a preconstruction nesting survey of all areas within 300 feet of the proposed activity will be required. The results of the survey will be provided in a report to the Director, Planning and Building Department and the Wildlife Agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. 13 Figure 1. Site Location - Las Palmas Park Project Portion of U.S.G.S. "National City, California" 7.5' Quad TOPO! map pr ttJ cn 01J21; 10 Tom "SanDiego.tpo" and "Urntied.tpg' 117''06'00" tN 11705OY W WG534 11? C4'00" by 11:r-U6 nn" W 1090 FEET 0 d Fnnted from TOTO!€N1999 W@tlor, Frcductm±s 4mmu' tona.corr) 'W0 s 7117`04'00" 14 w C) N 0 O Figure 2. Aerial Photo — Las Palmas Park LC) T Figure 3. Biological Resources on Aerial Photo — Las Palmas Park Project LEGEND 1 = Urban/Developed = Non-native Grassland = Coastal Sage Scrub = Non-native Vegetation 1 = Disturbed Freshwater Wetland = Non -vegetated Channel C4 :41Vtikr 16 National City Clry of National C' y Figure 4. Site Design Concept — Las Palmas Park Project Las Palmas Park 17 Table 1. Flora and Fauna Observed — Las Palmas Park Project Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Plants Acacia sp * Acacia NNV Amaranthus sp. Tumbleweed U/D Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed DFWW Artemisia californica California Sagebrush CSS Arundo donax * Giant Wild Reed DFWW Alriplex semibaccata * Australian Saltbush U/D Avena barbata * Slender Wild Oat NNG Baccharis sarothroides Broom Baccharis CSS Brassica geniculata * Perennial Mustard NNG Bromus diandrus * Ripgut Brome NNG Calystegia macrostegia Morning Glory CSS Capsella bursa-pastoris * Shepherd's Purse DFWW Carpobrotus edulis * Hottentot Fig NNV Chrysanthemum coronarium * Chrysanthemum U/D Coronopus didymus * Swine Cress U/D Cynodon dactylon * Bermuda Grass U/D Dichelostemma pu/chellum Blue Dicks CSS Encelia californica California Encelia CSS Eriogonum fasciculatum Flat -top Buckwheat CSS Erodium cicutarium * Red -stem Stork's-bill U/D Foeniculum vulgare * Wild Anise DFWW Gnaphalium beneolens Cudweed U/D Gnaphalium canescens Cudweed CSS Hedypnois cretica * Hedypnois NNG Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon CSS Hordeum murinum * Wild Barley NNG Limonium sp. Sea Lavender NNV Lotus scoparius Deerweed CSS Lupinus truncatus Collar Lupine CSS Lycium californicum California Box -thorn CSS Malosma laurina Laurel Sumac CSS Malva parviflora * Cheeseweed U/D Melilotus indicus * Indian Sweet Clover DFWW Mesembryanthemum crystal/inum Ice Plant U/D Myoporum laetum * Bastard Sandlewood NNV Olea europa * European Olive NNV Opuntia ficus-indica * Indian Fig NNV Opuntia sp. * Prickly Pear CSS Opuntia prolifera Coast Cholla CSS Oxalis pes-caprae * Sorrel U/D Phoenix canariensis * Canary Island Palm DFWW Picris echioides * Bristly Ox-tongue DFWW 18 Table 1. Flora and Fauna Observed — Las Palmas Park Project Scientific Name Plants, cont. Raphanus sativus * Rh US integrifolia Ricinus communis * Rumex crispus * Salix lasiolepis Salsola pestifer * Salvia apiana Salvia mellifera Schinus molle * Simmondsia chinensis Sisymbrium altissimum * Sisyrinnhium helium Sonchus oleraceus * Stephanomeria virgata Stipa pulchra Tamarix sp. * Taraxacum officinale Urtica urens Viguiera faciniata Washingtonia robusta * Yucca schidigera Birds Aphelocoma coerulescens Archilochus anna Buteo jamaicensis Carduelis psaltria Carpodacus mexicanus Corvus corax Corvus brachyrhynchos Dendrocopos nuttallii Dendroica coronata Mimus polyglottos Passer domesticus Pipito crissalis Sayornis nigricans Sayornis saya Zonotrichia leucophrys Common Name Wild Radish Lemonadeberry Castor Bean Curly Dock Arroyo Willow Russian Thistle White Sage Black Sage Peruvian Peppertree Jojoba Tumble Mustard Blue-eyed Grass Sow Thistle Stephanomeria Purple Stipa Salt Cedar Common Dandelion Dwarf Nettle San Diego County Viguiera Mexican Fan Palm Mojave Yucca Scrub Jay Anna's Hummingbird Red-tailed Hawk Lesser Goldfinch Housefinch Common Raven Common Crow Nuttall's Woodpecker Audubon's Warbler Mockingbird House Sparrow California Towhee Black Phoebe Say's Phoebe White -crowned Sparrow Habitat U/D CSS DFWW DFWW DFWW U/D CSS CSS NNV CSS U/D CSS U/D CSS CSS DFWW U/D DFWW CSS DFWW CSS CSS CSS U/D CSS CSS U/D U/D NNV NNV U/D U/D CSS NNV U/D NNV 19 Table 1. Flora and Fauna Observed — Las Palmas Park Project Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Mammals Canis latrans Coyote CSS Spermophilus beecheyi California Ground Squirrel U/D Thomomys bottae Valley Pocket Gopher U/D Total = 63 species of plant and 18 species of animal * = non-native species bold = sensitive species Habitat codes: U/D Urban/Developed CSS : Jstal Sage Scrub NNG - :'on -native Grassland NNV = Non-native Vegetation DFWW = Disturbed Freshwater Wetland 20 Table 2. Impact and Mitigation Analysis — Las Palmas Park Project Biological Resource Total Acres Onsite Acres Conserved Acres Impacted Mitigation (Pre -development) (Post -development) (Post -development) Required Urban/Developed 62.1 30.3 31.8 none Coastal Sage Scrub 1.2 none 1.2 2.4 ac (1.2 ac @ 2:1) Non-native 9.3 none 9.3 none Grassland Non-native Vegetation 8.5 none 8.5 none Disturbed 0.8 none 0.8 2.4 Freshwater Wetland (0.8 @ 3:1) Non -vegetated Channel 0.1 none 0.1 0.3 (0.1 @ 3:1) TOTAL 82 ac 30.3 ac 51.7 ac 5.1 ac 21 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Federal! Species Form CNPS List State Status Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Adolphia californica California Adolphia perennial deciduous shrub List 2.1 None Low Ambrosia chenopodiifolia San Diego Bursage perennial shrub List 2.1 None Low Ambrosia monogyra Single -whorl Burrobrush perennial shrub List 2.2 None Low Ambrosia pumila San Diego Ambrosia perennial rhizomatous herb List 1B.1 USFWS Endangered Low Androsace elongata ssp. acuta California Androsace annual herb List 4.2 None Low Aphanisma blitoides Aphanisma annual herb List 1B.2 None None Artemisia palmeri San Diego Sagewort perennial deciduous shrub List 4.2 None Low Astragalus deanei Dean's Milkvetch perennial herb List 18.1 None None Atriplex coulteri Coulter's Saltbush perennial herb List 18.2 None Low Atriplex pacifica South Coast Saltscale annual herb List 16.2 None Low Azolla mexicana Mexican Mosquito Fern annual/perennial herb List 4.2 None None Bergerocactus einoryi Golden-spined Cereus perennial stem succulent List 2.2 None Low Bloomeria clevelandii San Diego Goldenstar perennial bulbiferous herb List 18.1 None Low Calandrinia brewed Brewer's Redmaid annual herb List 4.2 None None Calandrinia maritime Sea Kisses annual herb List 4.2 None Low Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Camissonia lewisii Lewis' Evening Primrose annual herb List 3 None None Convolvulus simulans Small -flowered Morning Glory annual herb List 4.2 None None Cordylanthus maritimus ssp.rnaritirnus Salt Marsh Bird's Beak annual herb hemiparasitic List 1B.2 USFWS Endangered: CDFG Endangered None Deinandra conjugens Otay Tarplant Deinandra particulate Paniculate Tarplant annual herb List 16.1 USFWS Threatened; CDFG Endangered Low annual herb List 4.2 None Low Dichondra occidentalis Western Dichondra perennial rhizornatous herb List 4.2 None Low Dudleya variegate Variegated Dudleya perennial herb List 1B.2 None Low Ericarneria pafineri var. pafineri Palmer's Ericarneria perennial evergreen shrub List 1B.1 None Low Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii San Diego Button -celery annualfperennial herb List 1B.1 USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered None Euphorbia misera Cliff Spurge shrub List 2.2 None Low Ferocactus viridescens Coast Barrel Cactus perennial stern succulent List 2.1 None Low Frankenia pafineri Palmer's Frankenia perennial herb List 2.1 None None Harpagonella pafineri Palmer's Grapplinghook annual herb List 4.2 None None Heterotheca sessiliflora ssp.sessiliflora Beach Golden -aster perennial herb List 1B.1 None None Holocarpha virgata ssp. elongate Graceful Tarplant annual herb List 4.2 None Low lsocoma menziesii var. decurnbens Decumbent Goldenhush perennial shrub List 1B.2 None Low 23 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Iva hayesiana San Diego Marsh -elder perennial herb List 2.2 None Low Juncus acutus ssp- leopoldii Southwestern Spiny Rush perennial rhizomatous herb List 42 None Low Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Coulter's Goldfields annual herb List 1B.1 None Low Lepidium virginicurn var. robinsonii Robinson's Pepper -grass annual herb List 1B.2 None Low Lotus nuttallianus Nuttall's Lotus annual herb List 16,1 None None Lycium californicurn California Box -thorn perennial shrub List 4.2 None Observed Microseris douglasii ssp.platycarpha Small -flowered Microseris annual herb List 4.2 None None Mucronea californica California Spineflower annual herb List 4.2 None Low Narna stenocarpurn Mud Nama annual/perennial herb List 2.2 None None Navarretia fossalis Spreading Navarretia annual herb List 16.1 USFWS Threatened None Navarretia prostrate Prostrate Navarretia annual herb List 16.1 None None Nernacaulis denudata var. denudate Coast Woolly -heads annual herb List 16.2 None None Ophiog/ossum califomicurn California Adder's-tongue perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None Orobanche parishii ssp.brachy/oba Short -lobed Broomrape perennial herb parasitic List 4.2 None None Pentachaeta aurea ssp. aurea Golden -rayed Pentachaeta annual herb List 4.2 None None Phacelia ramosissima var.austrolitoralis South Coast Branching Phacelia perennial herb List 4.2 None None Piperia cooperi Chaparral Rein Orchid perennial herb List 4.2 None Low 24 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Psilocarphus brevissimus var.multiflorus Delta Woolly -marbles annual herb List 4.2 None None Romneya coulteri Coulters Malilija Poppy perennial rhizornatous herb List 4.2 None None Opuntia californica var. californica Snake Cholla perennial stern succulent List 16.1 None Low Selaginella cinerascens Ashy Spike -moss rhizomatous herb List 4.1 None Low Senecio astephanus San Gabriel Ragwort perennial herb List 4 None None Stemodia durantifolia Purple Stemodia perennial herb List 2.1 None None Suaeda esteroa Califomia Seablite perennial herb List 16.2 USFWS Endangered None Suaeda taxifolia Woolly Seablite perennial evergreen shrub List 4.2 None None Viguiera laciniata San Diego County Viguiera perennial shrub List 4.2 None Observed 25 Table 4. Special Status Animal Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Species Form Federal/State Status Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk bird CDFG WL Moderate Air hi'a ruficeps canescens >r�atl,f in California Rufous -crowned bird CDFG WL Low Anniella pulchra pulchra Silvery i.egless Lizard reptile CDFG SSC Moderate Antrozous pallidus Pa!li;i Rar mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Asr.rci:; „-�s hyperythra Orar-.,... throated Whiptail reptile CDFG SSC Moderate Aspidoscelis tigns stejnegeri CoastalWestern Whiptail reptile Branuhirecta sandiegonensis San Diego Fairy Shrimp invertebrate None Moderate USFWS Endangered None Branta bernicla Brant bird CDFG SSC Low Roteo'meatus Red-slioulderod Hawk bird None Moderate Calypte costae Costr;'s Hummingbird bird None Moderate Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis San Diego Cactus Wren bird USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC Moderate Carduelis lawrencei Lawrence's Goldfinch bird USFWS BCC Moderate Chaetodipus californicus femoralis Dulzura Pocket Mouse mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Pallid San Diego Pocket Mouse mammal CDFG SSC Low Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Western Snowy Plover bird USFWS Threatened, BCC; CDFG SSC Low Table 4. Special Status Animal Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Choeronycteris mexicana Mexican Long -tongued Bat mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Chondestes grammacus Lark Sparrow bird None Moderate Cicindela gabbii Western Tidal -flat Tiger Beetle invertebrate None None Cicindela latesignata latesignata Western Beach Tiger Beetle invertebrate None None Coloonyx variegatus abbotti San Diego Banded Gecko reptile None Moderate Dana us plexippus Monarch Butterfly invertebrate None Moderate Dendroica petechia brewsteri Yellow Warbler bird CDFG SSC Moderate Diadophis punctatus similis San Diego Ringneck Snake reptile None Moderate Elanus leucurus White-tailed Kite bird CDFG FP Moderate Empidonax traillii extimus Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered None Eremophila alpestris actia California Horned Lark bird CDFG WL Low Fumeces skiltonianus interparietalis Coronado Skink reptile CDFG SSC Moderate Falco columbarius Merlin bird CDFG WL Low Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern bird USFWS BCC None Icteria virens Yellow -breasted Chat bird CDFG SSC Moderate Lanus ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike bird USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC Moderate 27 Table 4. Special Status Animal Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Las Palmas Park Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus California Black Rail bird USFWS BCC; CDFG Threatened, FP None Neotoma lepida intermedia San Diego Desert Woodrat mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Onychomys torridus rarnona Southern Grasshopper Mouse mammal CDFG SSC Low Pandion haliaetus Osprey bird CDFG WL None Passerculus sandwichensis be/dingi Belding's savannah sparrow bird CDFG Endangered None Picoides nuttallii Nuttall's Woodpecker bird None Moderate Polioptila californica California Gnatcatcher bird USFWS Threatened; CDFG SSC Moderate Rallus longirostris levipes Light-footed Clapper Rail bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP None Salvadora hexalepis virgultea Coast Patch -nosed Snake reptile CDFG SSC Moderate Scaphiopus hammondii Westem Spadefoot Toad amphibian CDFG SSC Low Selasphorus sasin Allen's Hummingbird bird None Moderate Sterna forsteri Forster's Tern bird None None Sternula antillarum brown California Least Tern bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP Thalasseus elegans Elegant Tern bird USFWS BCC; CDFG WL None None Thamnophis harnmondil Two -striped Garter Snake reptile CDFG SSC Low 28 REFERENCES Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1966. A field guide to the mammals. Houghton -Mifflin Company. 289p. California Code of Regulations. 2009, as amended. Title 14, Natural Resources. Division 6, Resources Agency. Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. California Department of Fish and Game. 2009. Special animals. Natural Diversity Data Base, State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento. Code of Federal Regulations. 2005. Title 40, Protection of Environment. Part 232.2, Definitions. Cowardin, L.M., et. al. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. Washington D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington D.C. Holland, R.F. 1996. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. State of California, Nongame-Heritage Program. 156p (amended). Jameson, E.W., and H.J. Peeters. 1988. California Mammals. California Natural History Guides: 52. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, CA. Munz, P.A. 1974. A flora of Southern California. University of California Press. Berkeley. 1086p. Peterson, R.T. 1966, A field guide to western birds. Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966. 366p. Tibor, D.P. and L.A. Vorobik. 2001. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 387p. Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 336p 29 A BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR THE KIMBALL PARK CONCEPT PLAN CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALIFORNIA Prepared for DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT C/o Ms. Brooke Peterson, Senior Associate 5865 Mt. Alifan Drive San Diego, CA 92111 Prepared by Vincent N. Scheidt Biological Consultant 3158 Occidental Street San Diego, CA 92122 (858) 457-3873 Updated July 2010 April 2010 Vincent N. Scheidt, MA Certified Biological Consultant 1 INTRODUCTION This report addresses biological resources, project impacts. and CEQA compliance for the proposed Kimball Park Concept Plan (hereafter "Kimball Park project"). The subject project proposes the re- development of portions of the existing Kimball Park, located in National City, California. The project site totals approximately 34 acres, of which approximately 15.5 acres will be subject to re -development. The Kimball Park project site is located south of East 12th Street, west of Kimball Way, north of East 16th Street, and east of National City Boulevard the City of National City, California (Figure 1). PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The Kimball Park project proposes the re -development of approximately 15.5 acres of the existing Kimball Park and adjoining areas with neighborhood gardens, improvements and a trail associated with Paradise Creek, an improved skate park, a community gathering area, expansion of the Senior Village, a street closure park, and other improvements. The existing City Hall, library, Boys and Girls Club, cultural arts building, and Kimball Park recreational facilities are proposed to remain in their current states (Figure 4). The Kimball Park project site consists of City Hall, which is located at the northwestern corner of the site, a library, located along the central western site boundary, a Boys and Girls Club, which is present near the southeastern corner of the site, Senior Village, located along the eastern site boundary, additional structures, playing fields, athletic courts, lawns, and parking lots. A segment of Paradise Creek crosses the site from northeast to southwest (Figures 2 & 4). The Kimball Park project site is mostly flat, with a gentle northwest -facing slope at its southeastern corner and a gentle south -facing slope at its northwestern corner. The project site is completely surrounded by residential and commercial development; thus, it may be characterized as an "infill" project. PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of this study was to inventory the property with respect to biological resources, identify and map the onsite habitats, and present a discussion of rare, endangered, threatened, or otherwise sensitive plants or animals that could occur onsite. These data have been used to assess the site's biological resource values. This analysis allows a determination of project -related direct and indirect impacts, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and mitigation, if appropriate and necessary. The property supports sensitive wetland vegetation, and impacts to this habitat will result in measurable losses of biological resource values that are considered "significant" pursuant to CEQA, necessitating miti- gation. 2 METHODS Biology field surveys of the Kimball Park project site were completed by the author and Julia Groebner, Associate Biologist, on 11 November 2009, 14 December 2009, 15 January 2010, and 2 March 2010. Weather conditions were conducive to field surveying on these dates, with overcast to clear skies, temperatures in the 60' and low 70', and no appre ciable wind. The site was examined on foot, and plants, animals, and habitats encountered were inventoried in the field. However, the fully developed areas of the site were not included in our field survey, and vegetation associated with the park's landscaping was not inventoried. The limits of each habitat -type were mapped in the field utilizing an aerial photograph of the property (Figure 3). Plants and animals identified in association with the site are listed in Table 1 at the end of this report. Floral nomenclature used in this report follows Munz' and others. Plant communities, as designated by numerical code, follow Holland2. Wildlife observations were made opportunistically. Binoculars were used to aid in observations and all wildlife species detected were noted. Animal nomenclature used in this report is taken from Stebbins3 for reptiles and amphibians, Peterson' for birds, and Jameson, et. at' and Burt, et. a13 for mammals. RESULTS Most of the Kimball Park project site supports development or disturbed areas. However, some very small patches of native or naturalized habitat still remain on the site, including Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh, Non-native Grassland, and Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (Figure 3). Urban/Developed (Holland Code 12000) — 31.8 acres The majority of the Kimball Park project site is already developed with City Hall, a library, a Boys and Girls Club, associated structures, playing fields, athletic courts, lawns, and parking lots. All of these areas qualify as Urban/Developed. This habitat -type also completely surrounds the project site, in the form of roads, homes, and commercial development. Areas mapped as Urban/Developed are of little to no biological resource value. Munz, P.A., 1974, A flora of Southern California, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1086p. 2 Hol/and, R.F., 1996, Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California, State of California, Nongame-Heritage Program, 156p (amended). 3 Stebbins, R.C., 1985, A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 336p ' Peterson, R.T., 1966, A field guide to western birds, Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966, 366p. Jameson, E.W. and H.J. Peeters, 1988, California mammals, California Natural History Guides: 52, University of California Press, Berkeley. Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider, A field guide to the mammals, Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966, 289p. 3 Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (Holland Code 52120) — 0.1 acre A segment of Paradise Creek crosses the project site, flowing from northeast to southwest. Although the majority of the watercourse is channelized in concrete, the westernmost portion supports narrow strips of Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (DSCSM) vegetation along both banks, adjacent to the channel. This habitat -type is dominated by Pickleweed (Salicornia sp.), Desert Salt Grass (Distichlis spicata), American Saltwort (Batis maritima), Salty Susan (Jaumea carnosa), and other halophytes. Paradise Creek flows underground into a large box culvert at the southwestern corner of the project site, and the DSCSM therefore does not exhibit any direct offsite habitat connectivity. The DSCSM onsite is of low biological resource value, due to its very small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation from other areas of this habitat -type. This habitat -type is associated with a jurisdictional wetland and waters of the state and U.S. Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (Holland Code 11200) — 0.3 acre The central portion of Paradise Creek supports two discrete patches of Disturbed Freshwater Wetland (DFWW). These areas are dominated almost exclusively by Bulrush (Scirpus sp). At the time of the field survey, there was standing water and Mosquito Fish (Gambusia affinis) present in the westerly patch of DFWW, indicating perennial inundation. A larger area of DFWW is found in the easternmost portion of Paradise Creek, east of Kimball Way. This area is dominated by Cattails (Typha sp.), along with Mexican Fan Palm (Washingtonia robusta), Canary Island Palm (Phoenix canariensis), Giant Wild Reed (Arundo donax), and other non-native species. The DFWW onsite is of low to moderate biological resource value, due to its small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation from other areas of this wetland vegetation. This habitat -type is associated with a jurisdictional wetland and waters of the state/U.S. Non-native Grassland (Holland Code 42200) — 0.7 acre Non-native Grassland (NNG) is found at the southeastern corner of the site in areas supporting a dense thatch of naturalized non-native grasses and forbs. These areas appeared to be tilled annually, but are not maintained as lawns like the rest of the project site. The NNG is indicated by Ripgut Brome (Bromus diandrus), Wild Oat (Avena sp.), Bermuda Grass (Cynodon dactylon), Cheeseweed (Melva parviflora), Red -stem Stork's-bill (Erodium cicutarium), and others. The biological resource value of NNG is low. Disturbed Habitat (Holland Code 11300) - 0.9 acre Ruderal areas of the site that are not currently maintained and that support weedy shrubs and forbs or bare dirt qualify as Disturbed Habitat (DH). Plant species found in the DH include Wild Anise (Foeniculum vulgare), Russian Thistle (Salsola pestifer), Bermuda Buttercup (Oxalis pes-caprae), Cheeseweed, and others. Although portions of the DH consist mainly of bare dirt, this habitat -type does not include dirt paths, the playing fields, or other areas that are considered part of the park itself. DH is of little to no biological resource value. Plants The plants observed on the Kimball Park project site typify the diversity normally found in disturbed 4 wetland and annual grassland habitats in this part of San Diego County. A total of thirty-four plant species were detected during the field surveys. A complete list of the plants detected can be found in Table 1, attached. This list would be expected to represent at least 80 percent of the naturalized plants occurring on this property. The balance (mostly ephemeral annuals and some perennials in low numbers) would be detectable in the summer or fall months. Animals Nine species of animals were observed using the project site. This relatively small number is due to the site's highly developed/disturbed nature. The animals that were detected onsite are common species, abundant in the site's general vicinity. Additional common animal species certainly occur onsite, on at least an occasional basis, but were not directly observed during the field surveys. Animals observed onsite are listed in Table 1, attached. SENSITIVE RESOURCES Sensitive Vegetation Communities Vegetation communities (habitats) are generally considered "sensitive" if; (a) they are considered rare within the region by local experts, (b) they are known to support sensitive animal or plant species; and/or (c) they are known to serve as important wildlife corridors. These sensitive habitats are typically depleted throughout their known ranges, or are highly localized and/or fragmented. The DSCSM and DFWW present on the project site are considered sensitive, in that impacts to these habitat -types would be regulated by the City pursuant to CEQA and by the resource agencies as jurisdictional wetlands. In terms of biological resource values, the habitat quality of the DSCSM and DFWW is limited by their small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation. Sensitive Plants No sensitive plant species were observed on the Kimball Park project site during the field surveys. Sensitive plants are those listed as "Rare", "Endangered", "Threatened", "of Special Concern", or otherwise considered noteworthy by California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Native Plant Society, or other conservation agencies, organiza- tions, or local botanists'. Numerous sensitive plants are known from the general vicinity of the property (Table 3). Due to the 7 Tibor, D.P. and L.A. Vorobik, 2001, Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California, Califomia Native Plant Society, Sacramento, 387p. 5 developed/disturbed nature of the site, it is unlikely that any of these sensitive plant species occur onsite. Sensitive Animals No sensitive animal species were detected on the subject property during the field survey. Sensitive animals are those listed as "Rare", "Endangered", "Threatened", "of Special Concern", or otherwise noteworthy by the CDFG, the USFWS, the National Audubon Society, or other conservation agencies, organizations, or local zoologists8. Numerous sensitive animals are known from the general vicinity of the property (Table 4). Some wide- ranging sensitive animals may occur onsite on an occasional basis. This could include various uncommon reptiles, such as Coronado Skink (Eumeces skiltonianus interparietalis) and others. Sensitive birds known from the area include wide-ranging raptors, such as Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii), Red -shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus), and others. Several species of sensitive mammal are also known from the vicinity, including various wide-ranging bats and other small species. However, due to the developed nature of the majority of the site, its high amount of human use, and the small size, degree of disturbance, and isolation of the native and naturalized habitats onsite, no highly sensitive species or significant populations of sensitive species are anticipated to occur onsite. Wetlands The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), CDFG, and California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) all take jurisdiction over areas that qualify under their definitions of wetlands and "waters". In many cases, the boundaries of these jurisdictional lands coincide. The current definitions utilized by these agencies (collectively "Resource Agencies") with respect to wetlands regulation are as follows: Federal Wetlands Definitions The federal regulations that implement Section 404 of the CWA, which was enacted in 1972, define "wetlands' as follows9: "Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water (hydrology) at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation (hydrophytes) typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions (hydric soils). Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas." 8 California Department of Fish and Game, 2009, Special animals. Natural Diversity Data Base, State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento. 9 Code of Federal Regulations, 2005, Title 40, Protection of Environment, Part 232.2, Definitions. 6 Federal jurisdictional wetlands that are regulated by the ACOE under Section 404 of the CWA must exhibit all three of the above characteristics: hydrology, hydrophytes, and hydric soilst° Areas that may function as wetlands ecologically, but exhibit one or two of the three characteristics, do not currently qualify as federal jurisdictional wetlands, thus activities in these wetlands are not regulated under Section 404. The ACOE also regulates the discharge of dredge and/or fill material into "waters of the United States". The term "waters of the United States" is defined by Corps regulations as": 1) All waters that are currently used, or were used in the past, or may be susceptible to use in interstate or foreign commerce, including all waters which are subject to the ebb and flow of the tide; 2) All interstate waters including interstate wetlands; 3) All other waters such as intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sand flats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, or natural ponds, the use, degradation or destruction of which could affect interstate or foreign commerce including any such waters: (i) which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes; or (it) from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce; or (iii) which are used or could be used for industrial purpose by industries in interstate commerce; 4) All impoundments of waters otherwise defined as waters of the United States under the definition; 5) Tributaries of waters identified in paragraphs (a)(1)-(4) of this section; 6) The territorial seas; 7) Wetlands adjacent to waters (other than waters that are themselves wetlands) identified in paragraphs (a)(1)-(6) of this section. The ACOE also takes jurisdiction in non -tidal waters when wetlands are not present according to the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). This is defined as: "...that line on the shore established by the fluctuations of water and indicated by physical characteristics such as clear, natural line impressed on the bank, shelving, changes in the character of soil, destruction of terrestrial vegetation, the presence of litter and debris, or other appropriate means that consider the characteristics of the surrounding areas." 0 Environmental Laboratory, 1987, Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington D.C. Code of Federal Regulations, 2005, Title 40, Protection of Environment, Part 232.2, Definitions. 7 State Wetland Definitions According to the definition used by the CDFG12, wetlands are "lands transitional between terrestrial and aquatic systems where the water table is usually at or near the surface, or the land is covered by shallow water, "and they exist where any one of the following conditions are present: A) Predominantly undrained hydric soils (soils with low concentrations of oxygen in the upper layers during the growing season); B) a predominance, at least periodically, of hydrophytic plants (plants that have adapted to the low availability of oxygen and others stresses in saturated soils); C) a nonsoil substrate (such as a rocky shore) that is saturated with water or covered by shallow water each year at some point during the growing season. California's version of CWA is the Porter -Cologne Act, which established the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs) to oversee use and protection of the "waters of the state". In California, all surface waters and groundwater are considered "waters of the state". Paradise Creek, an intermittent stream, crosses the site, flowing from northeast to southwest. The onsite portion of Paradise Creek begins at the northeastern corner of the property, where it flows through a fenced but unlined and densely vegetated channel. The creek is undergrounded between D Avenue and Kimball Way and flows through an open concrete channel over the rest of its length, from D Avenue to the southwestern corner of the site. Portions of the creek support DSCSM and DFWW. There were also areas of standing water in the concrete channel at the time of our site visit, and the presence of Gambusia suggests that this water is perennial. The above -ground sections of Paradise Creek likely qualify as state and federal "waters". The vegetated portions of the creek may also qualify as state wetlands. The easternmost patch of DFWW may also qualify as federal wetlands, although it is unlikely that the remaining patches of DFWW would qualify as federal wetlands due to the presence of the concrete channel. 12 Cowardin, L.M., et. al., 1979, Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington D.C. 8 IMPACTS Impacts to biological resources associated with the Kimball Park project are assessed as being either "significant" or "less than significant", as defined by CEQA. The determination of impact significance is based on one or all of the following criteria": • a substantial effect on a rare or endangered species of plant or animal or habitat of that species, or; • a substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or; • a substantial reduction of habitat for fish, wildlife, or plants. • a conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, or; • a conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Anticipated impacts to habitats were calculated by determining the acreage of each habitat affected by the proposed site re -development. These are summarized in Table 2. Measurable direct impacts would result from the development of the Kimball Park project site. Direct impacts result from the actual removal of habitat, plants, and animals from the site through grading, brushing, clearing, construction, etc. These direct impacts are considered permanent because they result in a conversion of habitats to development. Indirect impacts also affect habitats, plants, and/or animals residing on or near the project site. These are not the direct result of grading or development. Examples of indirect impacts include introduction of exotic species, human or pet intrusions into natural areas, lighting, traffic, and noise. Indirect impacts are often called "edge effects". National City is not subject to the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, this guideline does not apply to the Kimball Park project. The majority of National City's local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources concern lands designated as Open Space Reserves and/or biological resources associated with Paradise Marsh, Bannister Marsh, and the Sweetwater River. Because no such lands are found onsite, the Kimball Park project is not anticipated to conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. California Code of Regulations, 2009, as amended, Title 14, Natural Resources, Division 6, Resources Agency; Chapter 3. Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act 9 Direct Impacts The following direct impacts are anticipated: (1) Up to 0.1 acre of Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh could be impacted as a result of site re- development. The loss of this vegetation is considered significant, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level which is "less than significant". (2) Up to 0.3 acre of Disturbed Freshwater Wetland could be impacted as a result of site re -development. The loss of this vegetation is considered significant, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level which is "less than significant". (3) Up to 0.7 acre of Non-native Grassland could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered less than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. (4) Up to 0.8 acre of Disturbed Habitat could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered less than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. (5) Up to 13.5 acres of Urban/Developed habitat could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered less than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this Toss is required. (6) The project could impact jurisdictional wetlands and "waters". This impact is considered significant, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation for this loss is required in order to reduce impacts to a level which is "less than significant". Direct impacts associated with the subject project are presented in tabular format in Table 2. Indirect Impacts Due to the site's high amount of human use and the fact that it is completely surrounded by development, all of the natural/naturalized habitats on the project site are already subject to substantial edge effects. Therefore, any additional edge effects resulting from project implementation are considered less than significant. 10 MITIGATION Implementation of the Kimball Park project will result in a direct loss of sensitive habitats, as defined by CEQA. Mitigation is thus required to ensure there is no loss of sensitive habitat values or degradation of significant natural areas as a result of site development. In general, impacts to wetlands habitats, such as DFWW and DSCSM, require mitigation at a 3-to-1 ratio. At least 1-to-1 of this ratio typically must consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2-to-1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3 acre of DFWW would require 0.9 acre of mitigation and impacts to 0.1 acre of DSCSM would require 0.3 acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur onsite, via the restoration of Paradise Creek, including the daylighting of the portion of the creek that is currently underground. The project's current conceptual design shows approximately 3.9 acres as being available for Paradise Creek improvements (Figure 4). In order for these improvements to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur offsite, via the securement of 0.9 acre -credits of SCSM and 0.3 acre -credits of FWW in an approved wetland mitigation bank. Because the project will impact state wetlands and state and federal "waters", it will likely be necessary to obtain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project implementation. To that end, it is recommended that the applicant provide to the Director, Planning and Building Department proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWOCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the Director that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. In order to ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 300 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from 15 February to 31 August of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds or raptors. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a preconstruction nesting survey of all areas within 300 feet of the proposed activity will be required. The results of the survey will be provided in a report to the Director, Planning and Building Department and the Wildlife Agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. 11 Figure 1. Site Location — Kimball Park Project Portion of U.S.G.S. "National City, California" 7.5' Quad TOPO! map punted on O2/1211n horn "SanD go.tpo" and "Untitled. tpq" 117°07'90" W 117°O6'00" W W5584117°0500" W ;a:_t'4n+" t,. ' `::'I' asK - I �t'tly "�...x9r._:'-n�-b.., '3-._".ti;A.:?, ,t" .';- Ciee- 1{ 'i".. _ : r_,;'. ■ i 11;'UE.00" 1,3. ,I._ 3 1.') FEET 3 nnx. , kl r, &ueci Ilan. TC 70! gi aaa'Aalatkeea Fmdwtion (' ; v, tone c°m) 12 Figure 2. Aerial Photo — Kimball Park Project 13 Figure 3. Biological Resources on Aerial Photo — Kimball Park Project LEGEND = Urban/Developed = Non-native Grassland = Disturbed Freshwater Wetland = Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh = Disturbed Habitat 14 National City Cfty of National Cfty Figure 4. Site Design Concept — Kimball Park Project Kimball Park Base 15 y 4 17, ,OJICT Usziex roxauLux» Table 1. Flora and Fauna Observed — Kimball Park Project Scientific Name Plants Ambrosia psilostachya Arundo donax * Atriplex patula Atriplex semibaccata * Ave ;,-+ SP. Bali:; ; rrfirma Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima * Beta ,nrlyaris var. cicla " Broma d,andrus * Cotula australis * Cusc; '.-, Salina dactylon * Disti( spicata DrosatiMumum floribundum " Erodium botrys " Erodiiirr; cicutarium * Foenieriurn vulgare * Hordeum murinum " Jaumea carnosa Lavatera cretica * Malva parvif/ora * Medicago polymorpha * Oxalis pes-caprae Phoenix canariensis * Polypogon monspeliensis * Rumex crispus * Salicornia sp. Salsola pestifer * Scirpus sp. Sisymbrium altissimum " Sonchus oleraceus " Taraxacum officinale * Typha sp. Washingtonia robusta " Fish Gambusia affinis " Birds Anas platyrhynchos Archilochus costae Carpodacus mexicanus Common Name Western Ragweed Giant Wild Reed Spear Oracle Australian Saltbush Wild Oat American Saltwort Sea Beet Chard Ripgut Brome Australian Brass Buttons Salt Marsh Dodder Bermuda Grass Desert Salt Grass Rosea Iceplant Long -beaked Stork's-bill Red -stem Stork's-bill Wild Anise Wild Barley Salty Susan Malva Rosa Cheeseweed Bur Clover Bermuda Buttercup Canary Island Palm Rabbitfoot Grass Curly Dock Pickleweed Russian Thistle Bulrush Tumble Mustard Sow Thistle Common Dandelion Cattails Mexican Fan Palm Mosquito Fish Mallard Costa's Hummingbird Housefinch Habitat DFWW DSCSM DH NNG DSCSM DSCSM NNG NNG DFWW DSCSM NNG DSCSM DSCSM NNG NNG DH NNG DSCSM DH DH, NNG DH DH DFWW DFWW DFWW DSCSM DH DFWW DH DH NNG, DH DFWW DFWW DFWW DSCSM U/D U/D 16 Table 1. Flora and Fauna Observed — Kimball Park Project (cont) Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Birds, cont. Corvus brachyrhynchos Common Crow U/D Corvus corax Common Raven DH Egretta Chula Snowy Egret DFWW Larus sp. Gull U/D Sayornis nigricans Black Phoebe DH Total = 34 species of plants and 9 species of animals * = non-native species Habitat codes: DSCSM = Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh DFWW = Disturbed Freshwater Wetland NNG = Non-native Grassland DH = Disturbed Habitat U/D = Urban/Developed 17 Table 2. Impact and Mitigation Analysis — Kimball Park Project Biological Resource Total Acres Onsite Acres Conserved Acres Impacted Mitigation (Pre -development) (Post -development) (Post -development) Required Urban/Developed 31.8 none 13.5 none Non-native 0.7 none 0.7 none Grassland Disturbed Habitat 0.9 none 0.9 none Disturbed Southern 0.1 none 0.1 0.3 ac Coastal Salt Marsh (0.1 ac @ 3:1) Disturbed 0.3 none 0.3 0.9 ac Freshwater Wetland (0.3 ac @ 3:1) TOTAL 33.8 ac 16.3 ac 15.5 ac 0.12 ac 18 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Federal/ Species Form CNPS List State Status Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Adolphia californica California Adolphia perennial deciduous shrub List 2.1 None None Ambrosia chenopodiifolia San Diego Bursage perennial shrub List 2.1 None None Ambrosia monogyra Single -whorl Burrobrush Ambrosia purnila San Diego Ambrosia perennial shrub List 2.2 None Low perennial rhizomatous herb List 18.1 USFWS Endangered Low Androsace elongate ssp. acuta California Androsace annual herb List 4.2 None Low Aphanisma blitoides Aphanisma annual herb List 1B.2 None Low Arternisia palmeri San Diego Sagewort perennial deciduous shrub List 4.2 None None Astragalus deanei Dean's Milkvetch perennial herb List 18.1 None None Atriplex coulteri Coulter's Saltbush perennial herb List 18.2 None Low Atnplex pacifica South Coast Saltscale annual herb List 18.2 None Low Azolla mexicana Mexican Mosquito Fem annual/perennial herb List 4.2 None None Bergerocactus emoryi Golden-spined Cereus perennial stem succulent List 2.2 None None Bloomeria clevelandii San Diego Goldenstar perennial bulbiferous herb List 16.1 None Low Calandrinia breweri Brewer's Redmaid annual herb List 4.2 None None Calandrinia maritime Sea Kisses annual herb List 4.2 None None 19 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Camissonia lewisii Lewis' Evening Primrose annual herb List 3 None None Convolvulus simulans Small -flowered Morning Glory annual herb List 4.2 None Low Cordylanthus maritimus ssp.maritimus Salt Marsh Bird's Beak annual herb hemiparasitic List 18.2 USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered Low Deinandra conjugens Otay Tarplant annual herb List 16.1 USFWS Threatened: CDFG Endangered Low Deinandra paniculata Paniculate Tarplant annual herb List 4.2 None Low Dichondra occidentalis Western Dichondra Dudleya variegate Variegated Dudleya perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None perennial herb List 181 None Low Ericemeria palmeri var. palmeri Palmer's Ericameria perennial evergreen shrub List 16.1 None None Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii San Diego Button -celery annual/perennial herb List 16.1 USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered None Euphorbia misera Cliff Spurge shrub List 2.2 None None Ferocactus viridescens Coast Barrel Cactus perennial stem succulent List 2.1 None None Frankenia palmeri Palmer's Frankenia perennial herb List 2.1 None Low Harpagonella palmeri Palmer's Grapplinghook annual herb List 4.2 None Low i-leterotheca sessiliflora ssp.sessiliflora Beach Golden -aster perennial herb List 16.1 None None Holocarpha virgata ssp. elongate Graceful Tarplant annual herb List 4.2 None Low lsocoma menziesii var. decumbens Decumbent Goldenbush perennial shrub List 162 None Low 20 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Iva hayesiana San Diego Marsh -elder perennial herb List 2.2 None Low Juncus acutus ssp. leopofdii Southwestern Spiny Rush perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None Low Lasthenia glabrata ssp- coulteri Coulter's Goldfields annual herb List 1B.1 None Low Lepidium virginicum var. robinsonii Robinson's Pepper -grass annual herb List 16.2 None None Lotus nuttallianus Nuttall's Lotus annual herb List 16-1 None None Lycium californicum California Box -thorn perennial shrub List 4.2 None None Microseris douglasii ssp.pletycarpha Small -flowered Microseris annual herb List 4.2 None Low Mucronea californica California Spineflower annual herb List 4.2 None Low Nama stenocarpum Mud Nama annual/perennial herb List 2.2 None Low Navarretia fossalis Spreading Navarretia annual herb List 1 B.1 USFWS Threatened None Navarretia prostrate Prostrate Navarretia annual herb List 1B_1 None None Nemacaulis denudata var. denudate Coast Woolly -heads annual herb List 16.2 None None Ophioglossum californicurn California Adder's-tongue perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None Orobanche parishii ssp.brachyloba Short -lobed Broomrape Pentachaeta aurea ssp. aurea Golden -rayed Pentachaeta perennial herb parasitic List 4.2 None None annual herb List 4.2 None Low Phacelia ramosissima var. austrolitoralis South Coast Branching Phacelia perennial herb List 4.2 None None 21 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Piperia cooperi Chaparral Rein Orchid perennial herb List 4.2 None Low Psilocarphus brevissimus var.multiflorus Delta Woolly -marbles annual herb List 4.2 None None Romneya coulteri Coulter's Matilija Poppy perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None Opuntia californica var. californica Snake Cholla perennial stem succulent List 18.1 None None Selaginella cinerascens Ashy Spike -moss rhizomatous herb List 4.1 None None Senecio astephanus San Gabriel Ragwort perennial herb List 4 None None Stemodia durantifolia Purple Stemodia perennial herb List 2.1 None Low Suaeda esteroa California Seablite perennial herb List 1B.2 USFWS Endangered Low Suaeda taxifolia Woolly Seablite perennial evergreen shrub List 4.2 None Low Viguiera laciniata San Diego County Viguiera perennial shrub List 4.2 None None 22 Table 4. Special Status Animal Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Species Form Federal/State Status Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk bird CDFG WL Aimophila ruficeps canescens Southern California Rufous -crowned Sparrow bird CDFG WL Moderate None Anniella pulchra pulchra Silvery Legless Lizard reptile CDFG SSC Low Antrozous pallidus Pallid Bat mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Aspidoscelis hyperythra Orange -throated Whiptail reptile CDFG SSC None Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Coastal Western Whiptail reptile None None Branchinecta sandiegonensis San Diego Fairy Shrimp invertebrate USFWS Endangered None Branta bernicla Brant bird CDFG SSC Low Buteo lineatus Red -shouldered Hawk bird None Moderate Calypte costae Costa's Hummingbird bird None Low Campylorhynchus brunneicapidlus sandiegensis San Diego Cactus Wren bird Carduelis lawrencei Lawrence's Goldfinch bird USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC None USFWS BCC Moderate Chaetodipus califomicus femoralis Dulzura Pocket Mouse mammal CDFG SSC None Chaetodipus fallax pallidus Pallid San Diego Pocket Mouse mammal CDFG SSC None Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Western Snowy Plover bird USFWS Threatened, BCC; CDFG SSC Low 23 Table 4. Special Status Animal Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Choeronycteris mexicana Mex t ' vied Bat mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Chondcstos grammacus Lark Sparrow Cicindela gabbii Western Tr!al-tlal Tiger Beetle bird None Moderate invertebrate None Low Cicrndc .ta Iatesignata Western Reach Tiger Beetle invertebrate None None Coleonvx variror;;,,: abbotb San Diego Banded Gecko Dams nir:�r. reptile None None invertebrate None Moderate Dendroica petechia brewsteri Yellow MI:Nor Sao 1..Autio F i bird CDFG SSC Low simihs Snake reptile None Moderate Elanus c.....- bird CDFG FP Moderate Eniprdonar f�a-6',; :tttimus Sordirvdcs+_ J!ow Flycatcher bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered None Eremophria alpest/is actia California Horned I. ark bird CDFG WL Low Eu:r!cc s sl:"orianus interparietalis Ceronadu >Klah reptile CDFG SSC Moderate Falco coiumbarius Merlin bird CDFG WL Low Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern bird USFWS BCC Low Icteria vireos Yellow -breasted Chat bird CDFG SSC Moderate Lariats ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike bird USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC Moderate 24 Table 4. Special Status Animal Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in Kimball Park Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus Cakiernia Black Rail bird USFWS BCC; CDFG Threatened, FP None Neotoma lepida intermedia San Diego Desert Woodrat mammal CDFG SSC None Onychomys torridus ramona Socthorn Grasshopper Mouse mammal CDFG SSC None Pandion haliaetus Osprey Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi Belding's savannah sparrow bird CDFG WL None bird CDFG Endangered None Picoides nuttallii Nutiall's Woodpecker bird None Low Polioptila califomica califorica California Gnatcatcher bird USFWS Threatened; CDFG SSC None Rallus longirostris lovipes Light-footed Clapper Rail bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP None Salvadora hexalepis virgultea Coast Patch -nosed Snake reptile CDFG SSC None Scaphiopus hammondii Western Spadefoot Toad amphibian CDFG SSC None Selasphorus sasin Allen's Hummingbird bird None Low Sterna forsteri Forster's Tern bird None Low Sternula antillarum brown California Least Tern bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP Low Thalasseus elegans Elegant Tern bird USFWS BCC; CDFG WL Low Tharnnophis hammondii Two -striped Garter Snake reptile CDFG SSC Low Vireo bellii pusillus Least Bell's Vireo bird USFWS Endangered, BCC; CDFG Endangered None 25 REFERENCES Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1966. A field guide to the mammals. Houghton -Mifflin Company, 289p. California Code of Regulations. 2009, as amended. Title 14, Natural Resources. Division 6, Resources Agency. Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. California Department of Fish and Game. 2009. Special animals. Natural Diversity Data Base, State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento. Code of Federal Regulations. 2005. Title 40, Protection of Environment. Part 232.2, Definitions. Cowardin, L.M., et. al. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services. Washington D.C. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Washington D.C. Holland, R.F. 1996. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. State of California, Nongame-Heritage Program. 156p (amended). Jameson, E.W., and H.J. Peeters. 1988. California Mammals. California Natural History Guides: 52. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, CA. Munz, P.A. 1974. A flora of Southern California. University of California Press. Berkeley. 1086p. Peterson, R.T. 1966, A field guide to western birds. Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966. 366p. Tibor, D.P. and L.A. Vorobik. 2001. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 168p. Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 336p 26 27 A BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT FOR THE EL TOYON PARK CONCEPT PLAN CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALIFORNIA Prepared for DESIGN, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT C'c 1 1s Brooke Peterson, Senior Associate 5865 Mt. Alifan Drive San Diego, CA 92111 Prepared by Vincent N. Scheidt Biological Consultant 3158 Occidental Street San Diego, CA 92122 (858) 457-3873 Updated July 2010 April 2010 Vincent N. Scheidt, MA Certified Biological Consultant INTRODUCTION This report addresses biological resources, project impacts, and CEQA compatibility for the proposed El Toyon Park Concept Plan (hereafter "El Toyon Park project"). The subject project proposes the re- development of portions of the existing El Toyon Park, located in National City, California. The subject property totals approximately 39 acres, of which approximately 18 will be subject to re -development. The El Toyon Park project site is located south of East Division Street, east of the 1-805 Freeway, west of Euclid Avenue, and north of East 41h Street in the City of National City, California (Figure 1). PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION The El Toyon Park project proposes the re -development of approximately 18 acres of the existing El Toyon Park and adjoining lands with recreation facilities, a farmer's market area, neighborhood gardens, a potential street closure park, a dog park, a trail, and other improvements. The existing Rancho de la Nacion and El Toyon Elementary Schools and some of the existing El Toyon Park recreational facilities are proposed to remain in their current states (Figure 4). The El Toyon Park project site consists of the Rancho de la Nacion and El Toyon Elementary Schools, which are located on the northern portion of the site, and the El Toyon Park recreational facilities and associated improvements, which form the remainder of the site (Figures 2 & 4). The majority of the site is flat, although the baseball diamond on the southwest portion of the site is surrounded by gentle to moderate slopes. The project site is completely surrounded by residential and commercial development; thus, it may be characterized as an "infill" project. PURPOSE OF STUDY The purpose of this study was to inventory the property with respect to biological resources, identify and map the onsite habitats, and present a discussion of rare, endangered, threatened, or otherwise sensitive plants or animals that could occur onsite. These data have been used to assess the site's biological resource values. This analysis allows a determination of project -related direct and indirect impacts, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and mitigation, if appropriate and necessary. METHODS Biology field surveys of the El Toyon Park project site were completed by the author and Julia Groebner, Associate Biologist, on 11 November 2009, 14 December 2009, 15 January 2010, and 2 March 2010. 2 Weather conditions were conducive to field surveying on these dates, with overcast to clear skies, temperatures in the 60% and low 70's, and no appre ciable wind. The site was examined on foot, and plants, animals, and habitats encountered were inventoried in the field. However, the fully developed areas of the site were not included in our field survey, and vegetation associated with the park's landscaping was not inventoried. The limits of each habitat -type were mapped in the field utilizing an aerial photograph of the property (Figure 3). Plants and animals identified in association with the site are listed in Table 1 at the end of this report. Floral nomenclature used in this report follows Munz1 and others. Plant communities, as designated by numerical code, follow Holland2. Wildlife observations were made opportunistically. Binoculars were used to aid in observations and all wildlife species detected were noted. Animal nomenclature used in this report is taken from Stebbins3 for reptiles and amphibians, Peterson' for birds, and Jameson, et. of and Burt, et. of for mammals. RESULTS Most of the El Toyon Park project site supports development and associated landscaping. However, several other habitat -types are found onsite, including Non-native Grassland, Non-native Vegetation, and Disturbed Habitat (Figure 3). Urban/Developed (Holland Code 12000) — 31.6 acres The majority of the El Toyon Park project site is already developed with the Rancho de la Nacion and El Toyon Elementary Schools, a baseball diamond, athletic courts, accessory structures, lawns, paved roads, and parking lots. All of these areas qualify as Urban/Developed. This habitat -type also completely surrounds the project site, in the form of roads, homes, and businesses. Areas mapped as Urban/Developed are of little to no biological resource value. Non-native Grassland (Holland Code 42200) — 1.5 acres Non-native Grassland (NNG) is found in several patches along the eastern and southern boundaries of the site in areas supporting a dense thatch of naturalized non-native grasses and forbs. These areas may Munz, P.A., 1974, A flora of Southern California, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1086p. 2 Holland, R.F., 1996, Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of Califomia, State of California, Nongame-Heritage Program, 156p (amended). 3 Stebbins, R.C., 1985, A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, 336p ' Peterson, R.T., 1966, A field guide to western birds, Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966, 366p. ' Jameson, E.W. and H.J. Peeters, 1988, California mammals, California Natural History Guides: 52, University of California Press, Berkeley. s Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider, A field guide to the mammals, Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966, 289p. 3 be tilled occasionally, but are not maintained as lawns like other parts of the project site. The NNG is indicated by Ripgut Brome (Bromus diandrus), Wild Oat (Avena sp.), and other annual weeds. The biological resource value of NNG is low. Non-native Vegetation (Holland Code 11000) — 2.7 acres Non-native Vegetation (NNV) is present on the eastern half of the site in areas that are characterized by dense landscaping. This habitat -type is indicated by Eucalyptus (Eucalyptus sp.), Acacia (Acacia sp.), Bastard Sandlewood (Myoporum laetum), and Peruvian Pepper -tree (Schinus molle) over an understory of Nodding !ceplant (Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum), various other annual forbs and grasses, and other weedy species. This habitat -type is of low biological resource value. Disturbed Habitat (Holland Code 11300) — 2.8 acres Ruderal areas of the site that are currently not maintained and that support a sparse cover of weedy species qualify as supporting Disturbed Habitat (DH). Plant species found in the DH include Cheeseweed (Malva parviflora), Red -stem Stork's-bill (Erodium cicularium), and others. Portions of the DH consist mainly of bare dirt; however, this habitat -type does not include the track, playing fields, or other areas that are considered part of the park itself. DH is of little to no biological resource value. Plants A total of twenty-six plant species were detected during the field survey of this site. The plants observed on the El Toyon Park project site typify the diversity normally found in annual grassland and non- native/disturbed areas in this part of San Diego County. A complete list of the plants detected can be found in Table 1, attached. This list is expected to represent at least 80 percent of the naturalized plants occurring on this property. The balance (mostly ephemeral annuals and possibly some perennials in low numbers) would be detectable in the summer or fall months. Animals Five species of animal were observed using the project site. This small number is due to the site's highly developed/disturbed nature. The most common animal onsite by far is California Ground Squirrel (Spermophilus beecheyi); in fact, the site appears to be infested by this species, with scores of specimens observed in the western portion of the property. Additional common animal species certainly occur onsite, on at least an occasional basis, but were not directly observed during the field surveys. Animals observed onsite are listed in Table 1, attached. 4 SENSITIVE RESOURCES Sensitive Vegetation Communities Vegetation communities (habitats) are generally considered "sensitive' if; (a) they are considered rare within the region by local experts, (b) they are known to support sensitive animal or plant species; and/or (c) they are known to serve as important wildlife corridors. These sensitive habitats are typically depleted throughout their known ranges, or are highly localized and/or fragmented. None of the habitats present on the project site are considered sensitive. Impacts to the onsite habitat - types are not regulated by the City pursuant to CEQA. Sensitive Plants No sensitive plant species were observed on the El Toyon Park project site during the field surveys. Sensitive plants are those listed as "Rare", "Endangered", "Threatened", "of Special Concern", or otherwise considered noteworthy by California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG), the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the California Native Plant Society, or other conservation agencies, organiza- tions, or local botanists'. Numerous sensitive plants are known from the general vicinity of the El Toyon Park project site (Table 3). Due to the developed/disturbed nature of the property, it is unlikely that any of these sensitive plant species occur onsite in any significant numbers. Sensitive Animals No sensitive animal species were detected on the subject property during the field surveys. Sensitive animals are those listed as "Rare", "Endangered", "Threatened", "of Special Concern", or otherwise noteworthy by the CDFG, the USFWS, the National Audubon Society, or other conservation agencies, organizations, or local zoologists&. Numerous sensitive animals are known from the general vicinity of the property (Table 4). Some wide- ranging sensitive animals may occur onsite on an occasional basis. This could include various uncommon reptiles, such as Coronado Skink (Eumeces skiltonianus interparietalis) and others. Sensitive birds known from the area include wide-ranging raptors, such as Cooper's Hawk (Accipiter cooperii), Red -shouldered Hawk (Buteo lineatus), and others. Several species of sensitive mammals are also known from the 7 Tibor, D.P. and L.A. Vorobik, 2001, Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California, California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, 387p. 8 California Department of Fish and Game, 2009, Special animals, Natural Diversity Data Base, State of California Resources Agency, Sacramento. 5 vicinity, including various wide-ranging bats and other small species. However, due to the developed/disturbed nature of the majority of the site and its high amount of human use, no highly sensitive species or significant populations of sensitive species are anticipated to occur onsite. Wetlands Wetlands and jurisdictional "waters" are not present on the project site. The site does not support hydrophytes, hydric soils, or wetlands hydrology. Furthermore, we saw no drainages that support a "bed - and -bank", an ordinary high water mark, or any other signs of jurisdictional wetlands or "waters". IMPACTS Impacts to biological resources associated with the El Toyon Park project are assessed as being either "significant" or "less than significant", as defined by CEQA. The determination of impact significance is based on one or all of the following criteriag: • a substantial effect on a rare or endangered species of plant or animal or habitat of that species, or; • a substantial interference with the movement of any resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or; a substantial reduction of habitat for fish, wildlife, or plants. • a conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, or; • a conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Anticipated impacts to habitats were calculated by determining the acreage of each habitat affected by the proposed re -development. These are summarized in Table 2. Measurable direct impacts would result from the development of the El Toyon Park project site. Direct impacts result from the actual removal of habitat, plants, and animals from the site through grading, brushing, clearing, and construction. These direct impacts are considered permanent, because they result in a conversion of habitats to developed areas. Indirect impacts also affect habitats, plants, and/or animals residing on or near the project site. These are not the direct result of grading or development. Examples of indirect impacts include introduction of exotic species, human or pet intrusions into natural areas, lighting, traffic, and noise. Indirect impacts are often called "edge effects". National City is not subject to the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan. Therefore, this California Code of Regulations, 2009, as amended, Title 14, Natural Resources, Division 6, Resources Agency, Chapter 3, Guidelines for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. 6 guideline does not apply to the El Toyon Park project. The majority of National City's local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources concern lands designated as Open Space Reserves and/or biological resources associated with Paradise Marsh, Bannister Marsh, and the Sweetwater River. Because no such lands are found onsite, the El Toyon Park project is not anticipated to conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. Direct Impacts The following direct impacts are anticipated: (1) Up to 13.3 acres of Urban/Developed habitat could be impacted as a result of site re -development. The loss of this vegetation is considered less than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. (2) Up to 1.5 acres of Non-native Grassland could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered Tess than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. (3) Up to 2.7 acres of Non-native Vegetation could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered less than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. (4) Up to 2.8 acres of Disturbed Habitat could be lost as a result of site re -development. This impact is considered Tess than significant, as defined by CEQA. No specific mitigation for this loss is required. Direct impacts associated with the subject project are presented in tabular format in Table 2. Indirect Impacts Because the site does not support any areas of natural habitat, indirect impacts resulting from project implementation are not anticipated. MITIGATION As currently proposed, the El Toyon project will not result in significant impacts to biological resources. Therefore, no mitigation is required at this time. 7 In order to ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code. site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 300 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from 15 February to 31 August of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds or raptors. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a preconstruction nesting survey of all areas within 300 feet of the proposed activity will be required. The results of the survey will be provided in a report to the Director, Planning and Building Department and the Wildlife Agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. 8 r^+ n•r jnnx rr Figure 1. Site Location — El Toyon Park Project Portion of U.S.G.S. "National City, California" 7.5' Quad 101' 1 map printed on 02/12/1C (rare "SanDiedatpo" and "Untrtled.tpg" 117.06'00" W 11705'00" W •IL lo. FEET--�••••••.•••_ ,,,, �n nU+n, «awe; — —i Printed frau TOPC.0 R 1999 ord wer Pmdwtvcro raww.topocorn) 9 WG5B4 117°04'00" W ern Bia ow .1 ;SYi4 11 7"r 1 t-)2 n N 7 Figure 3. Biological Resources on Aerial Photo — El Toyon Park Project LEGEND = Urban/Developed = Non-native Vegetation = Non-native Grassland = Disturbed Habitat 11 National City Figure 4. Site Design Concept - El Toyon Park Project Rancho del la Nacion & El Toyon Elementary Schools City of National City 12 Table 1. Flora and Fauna Observed — El Toyon Park Project Scientific Name Common Name Habitat Plants Acacia sp. * Acacia NNV Ambrosia psilostachya Western Ragweed NNG Atriplex semibaccata * Australian Saltbush NNG Avena sp. * Wild Oat NNG Bromus diandrus * Ripgut Brome NNG Chenopodium murale * Goosefoot NNV Coronopus didymus * Swine Cress DH Cyperus sp * Sedge DH Erodiurn cicutarium * Red -stem Stork's-bill NNG Erodiurn moschatum * White -stem Stork's-bill DH Eucalyptus sp. * Eucalyptus NNV Hordeurn murinum * Wild Barley NNG Isocorna menziesii Coastal Goldenbush DH Lotus scoparius Deerweed DH Malva parviflora * Cheeseweed DH Melilotus indicus * Indian Sweet Clover DH Mesembryanthemum nodiflorum * Nodding Iceplant NNV Myoporum laetum * Bastard Sandlewood NNV Raphanus sativus * Wild Radish DH Rhus irttegrifotia Lemonadeberry NNV Rumex crispus * Curly Dock DH Salsola pestifer * Russian Thistle DH Schinas molle * Peruvian Peppertree NNV Schismus barbatus * Schismus NNV Sisymbrium altissimum * Tumble Mustard DH Sonchus oleraceus * Sow Thistle DH Birds Archilochus anna Anna's Hummingbird NNV Carpodacus mexicanus Housefinch NNV Falco sparverius American Kestrel NNG Sayornis nigricans Black Phoebe NNG Mammals Spermophilus beecheyi California Ground Squirrel DH Total = 26 species of plant and 5 species of animal * = non-native species Habitat codes: NNG = Non-native Grassland; NNV = Non-native Vegetation; DH = Disturbed Habitat 13 Table 2. Impact and Mitigation Analysis — El Toyon Park Project Biological Resource Total Acres Onsite Acres Conserved Acres Impacted Mitigation (Pre -development) (Post -development) (Post -development) Required Urban/Developed 31.6 18.3 13.3 none Non-native Grassland 1.5 none 1.5 none Non-native Vegetation 2.7 none 2.7 none Disturbed Habitat 2.8 none 2.8 none TOTAL 38.6 18.3 20.3 none 14 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Federal/ Species Form CNPS List State Status Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Adolphia californica California Adolphia perennial deciduous shrub List 2.1 None None Ambrosia chenopodnfolia San Diego Bursage perennial shrub List 2.1 None None Ambrosia monogyra Single -whorl Burrobrush perennial shrub List 2.2 None None Ambrosia pumila San Diego Ambrosia perennial rhizomatous herb List 1B.1 USFWS Endangered Low Androsace elongate ssp. acuta California Androsace annual herb List 4.2 None Low Aphanisma blitoides Aphanisma annual herb List 18.2 None Low Artemisia patmeri San Diego Sagewort perennial deciduous shrub List 4.2 None None Astragalus deanei Dean's Milkvetch perennial herb List 1B.1 None None Atriplex coulteri Coulter's Saltbush perennial herb List 16.2 None Low Atriplex pacifica South Coast Saltscale annual herb List 1 B.2 None Low Azolla mexicana Mexican Mosquito Fern annual/perennial herb List 4.2 None None Bergerocactus emoryi Golden-spined Cereus perennial stem succulent List 2.2 None None Bloomeria clevelandii San Diego Goldenstar perennial bulbiferous herb List 1B.1 None Low Calandrinia breweri Brewer's Redmaid annual herb List 4.2 None None Calandrinia maritime Sea Kisses annual herb List 4.2 None None 15 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Camissonia lewisii Lewis' Lvening Primrose annual herb List 3 None None Convolvulus simulans Small -flowered Morning Glory annual herb List 4.2 None Low Cordylanthus maritimus ssp-maritimus Salt Marsh Bird's Beak annual herb hemiparasitic List 18.2 USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered None Deinandra conjugens Otay Tarplant annual herb List 18.1 USFWS Threatened: CDFG Endangered Low Deinandra paniculata Paniculate Tarplant annual herb List 4.2 None Low D/chon'Iv, occidentalis U'Jest�,in Uichondra perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None Ducllcya variegata Variegated Dudleya perennial herb List 1 B.2 None None Ericameria palmeri var. palmeri Palmer's Ericameria perennial evergreen shrub List 18.1 None None Eryngiurn aristulatum var. parishii San Diego Button -celery annual/perennial herb List 18.1 USFWS Endangered: CDFG Endangered None Euphorbia misera Chff Spurge shrub List 2.2 None None Ferocactus viridescens Coast Barrel Cactus perennial stern succulent List 2.1 None None Frankenia palmeri Palmer's Frankenia perennial herb List 2.1 None None Harpagonella palmeri Palmer's Grapplinghook annual herb List 4.2 None Low Heterotheca sessiliflora ssp.sessiliflora Beach Golden -aster perennial herb List 1B.1 None None Holocarpha virgata ssp. elongate Graceful Tarplant annual herb List 4.2 None Low Isocoma menziesii var. decumbens Decumbent Goldenbush perennial shrub List 18.2 None Low 16 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Iva hayesiana San Diego Marsh -elder perennial herb List 2.2 None None Juncus acutus ssp. leopoldii Southwestern Spiny Rush perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulter' Coulters Goldfields annual herb List 1B.1 None None Lepidium virginicum var. robinsonii Robinson's Pepper -grass annual herb List 18.2 None None Lotus nuttallianus Nuttall's Lotus annual herb List 16.1 None None Lycium californicum California Box -thorn perennial shrub List 4.2 None None Microseris douglasii ssp.platycarpha Small -flowered Microseris annual herb List 4.2 None Low Mucronea californica California Spineflower annual herb List 4.2 None None Nama stenocarpum Mud Nama annual/perennial herb List 2.2 None None Navarretia fossalis Spreading Navarretia annual herb List 1B.1 USFWS Threatened None Navarretia prostrate Prostrate Navarrelia annual herb List 1B.1 None None Nemacautis denudata var. denudate Coast Woolly -heads annual herb List 1B.2 None None Ophioglossum californicum California Adder's-tongue perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None Orobanche parishii ssp.brachyloba Short -lobed Broomrape perennial herb parasitic List 4.2 None None Pentachaeta aurea ssp. aurea Golden -rayed Pentachaeta annual herb List 4.2 None None Phacelia ramosissima var.austrolitoralis South Coast Branching Phacelia perennial herb List 4.2 None None 17 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Piperia cooperi Chaparral Rein Orchid perennial herb List 4.2 None Low Psilocarphus brevissimus var.multiflorus Delta Woolly -marbles annual herb List 4.2 None None Romneya coulteri Coulters Matilija Poppy perennial rhizomatous herb List 4.2 None None Opuntia californica var califomica Snake Cholla Selaginella cinerascens Ashy Spike -moss perennial stem succulent List 16.1 None None rhizomatous herb List 4.1 None None Senecio astephanus San Gabriel Ragwort perennial herb List 4 None None Stemodia durantifolia Purple Sternodia perennial herb List 2.1 None None Suaeda esteroa California Seablite perennial herb List 1B.2 USFWS Endangered None Suaeda raxifolia Woolly Seablite perennial evergreen shrub List 4.2 None None Viguiera laciniata San Diego County Viguiera perennial shrub List 4.2 None None 18 Table 4. Special Status Animals Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Species Form Federal/State Status Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Accipiter cooperii Cooper's hawk bird CDFG WL Moderate Aimophila ruficeps canescens Southern California Rufous -crowned Sparrow bird CDFG WL None Anniella pulchra pulchra Silvery Legless Lizard reptile CDFG SSC None Antrozous pailidus Pallid Bat mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Aspidoscelis hypetythra Orange -throated Whiptail reptile CDFG SSC None Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri Coastal Western Whiptail reptile None None Branchinecta sandiegonensis San Diego Fairy Shrimp invertebrate USFWS Endangered None Brenta bernicla Brant bird CDFG SSC None Buteo lineatus Red -shouldered Hawk bird None Moderate Calypte costae Costa's Hummingbird bird None Low Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis San Diego Cactus Wren bird USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC None Carduelis lawrencei Lawrence's Goldfinch bird USFWS BCC Moderate Chaetodipus californicus femoralis Dulzura Pocket Mouse Chaetodipus fallax pailidus Pallid San Diego Pocket Mouse mammal mammal CDFG SSC None CDFG SSC None Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus Western Snowy Plover bird USFWS Threatened, BCC; CDFG SSC Low 19 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Choeronyctens mexicana Mryican Long -tongued Bat mammal CDFG SSC Moderate Chundestes grammacus Lark Sparrow bird None Moderate Cicindela gabbii Western Tidal -flat Tiger Beetle invertebrate None None Cicindela latesignata latesignata Western Beach Tiger Beetle invertebrate None None Coteonyx variegatus abbotti San Diego Banded Gecko reptile None None Deraus ptexippus Monarch Butterfly invertebrate None Moderate Dendroica petechia brewsteri Yellow Warbler bird CDFG SSC None Diadophis punctatus similis San Diego Ringneck Snake reptile None Moderate Elanus leucurus White-tailed Kite bird CDFG FP Moderate Empidonax traillii extimus Southwestern Willow Flycatcher bird USFWS Endangered: CDFG Endangered None Eremophila alpestris actia California Horned Lark bird Eurneces skiltonianus interparietalis Coronado Skink reptile CDFG WL CDFG SSC Low Moderate Falco columbarius Merlin bird CDFG WL Low Hydroprogne caspia Caspian Tern bird USFWS BCC None lcteria virens Yellow -breasted Chat bird CDFG SSC Moderate Lanus ludovicianus Loggerhead Shrike bird USFWS BCC; CDFG SSC Moderate 20 Table 3. Special Status Plant Species Known from or with the Potential to Occur in El Toyon Park Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus California Black Rail bird USFWS BCC; CDFG Threatened, FP None Neotorna Iepida intermedia San Diego Desert Woodrat mammal CDFG SSC None Onychomys torridus ramona Southern Grasshopper Mouse mammal CDFG SSC None Pandion haliaetus Osprey bird CDFG WL None Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi Belding's savannah sparrow bird CDFG Endangered None Picoides nuttallii Nuttall's Woodpecker bird None None Polioptila calif -orate californica California Gnatcatcher bird USFWS Threatened; CDFG SSC None Rallus longirostris levipes Light-footed Clapper Rail bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP None Salvadora hexalepis virgultea Coast Patch -nosed Snake reptile CDFG SSC None Scaphiopus hammondii Western Spadefoot Toad amphibian CDFG SSC None Selasphorus sasin Allen's Hummingbird bird None Low Sterna forsteri Forster's Tern bird None None Sternula antillarum browni California Least Tem Thalasscus elegans Elegant Tern bird bird USFWS Endangered; CDFG Endangered, FP None USFWS BCC; CDFG WL None Thamnophis hammondii Two -striped Garter Snake reptile CDFG SSC None 21 REFERENCES Burt, W.H. and R.P. Grossenheider. 1966. A field guide to the mammals. Houghton -Mifflin Company, 289p. California Code of Regulations. 2009, as amended. Title 14, Natural Resources. Division 6. Resources Agency. Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. California Department of Fish and Game. 2009. Special animals. Natural Diversity Data Base, State of California Resources Agency. Sacramento. Holland, R.F. 1996. Preliminary descriptions of the terrestrial natural communities of California. State of California, Nongame-Heritage Program. 156p (amended). Jameson, E.W., and H.J. Peeters. 1988. California Mammals. California Natural History Guides: 52. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley, CA. Munz, P.A. 1974. A flora of Southern California. University of California Press. Berkeley. 1086p. Peterson, R.T. 1966, A field guide to western birds. Houghton -Mifflin Company, 1966. 366p. Tibor, D.P. and L.A. Vorobik. 2001. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento. 387p. Stebbins, R.C. 1985. A field guide to western reptiles and amphibians. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. 336p 22 D E S I G N, COMMUNITY & ENVIRONMENT 750 WEST FIR STREET, NO. 405 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 TEL: 858 336 0938 FAX: 619 269 1969 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALIFORNIA CONTRACT DOCUMENT FOR NATIONAL CITY CHILLER REPLACEMENT Specification No. 11-01 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT/ENGINEERING DIVISION SEALED BIDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO: THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 91950 BID OPENING TIME: 3:00 P.M. DATE: June 30, 2011 LOCATION: Large Conference Room 2nd Floor National City Civic Center 1243 National City Boulevard - National City, California This is a U.S. Department of Energy funded project. Davis -Bacon prevailing wages are required. 6 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM This chapter provides a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) for the National City Comprehensive Land Use Update in combi- nation with the annual report required by Government Code 65400 (CEQA Guidelines Section 15097(b)). The purpose of the MMRP is to ensure the implementation of mitigation measures identified as part of the environ- mental review for the project. The MMRP includes the following informa- tion: • A list of mitigation measures; • The party responsible for implementing the mitigation measures; • The timing for implementation of the mitigation measure; • The agency responsible for monitoring the implementation; and • The monitoring action and frequency. The City of National City must adopt this MMRP, or an equally effective program, if it approves the Comprehensive Land Use Update with the mitiga- tion measures that were adopted or made conditions of project approval. EXHIBIT "B" 6- I CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITI OATI ON MONITORING AND REPORTING PROG RA 1 TART F 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Mitigation Measures Air Quality Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency AQ-1: The proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update in- cludes numerous policies aimed at reducing vehicle travel through land use planning, encouraging alternatives modes of transportation and use of project level review to reduce air pollutant emissions from vehicle travel. Development Services Department Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review City of National City Verification of Ongoing policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures. AQ-2a: Dust Suppression. The following enhanced dust Development Services Depart - control measures shall be required by the City as part of the ment project entitlement process in order to control fugitive dust emissions during construction and shall be incorporated into Title 9, Health and Sanitation, of the Municipal Code. These measures are in addition to SDAPCD regulatory requirements that apply to construction projects. • Limit traffic speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph. • Install sandbags or other erosion control measures to pre- vent silt runoff to public roadways. • Replant vegetation in disturbed areas as quickly as possi- ble. • Limit access to the construction sites, so tracking of mud or dirt on to public roadways can be prevented. If neces- sary, use wheel washers for all exiting trucks, or wash off the tires or tracks of all trucks and equipment leaving the site. Suspend excavation and grading activity when winds (instan- taneous gusts) exceed 20 mph or dust clouds cannot be pre- vented from extending beyond the site. 6-2 The City's Munici- pal Code will be revised within 24 months (Condition of approval for interim applicable projects prior to adoption of the ordinance.) City of National City Draft and adopt Once ordinance to amend the City's Municipal Code CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORING TABLE 6- I PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures AQ-2b: Exhaust Emission Controls. Projects that have significant construction period exhaust emissions shall reduce fleet average emission rates. Developers or contractors shall provide a plan for approval by the City or SDAPCD demon- strating that the heavy-duty (>50 horsepower) off -road vehi- cles to be used in the construction project for more than an accumulated 40 hours, including owned, leased and subcon- tractor vehicles, will achieve emission standards similar to in - use equipment that meets CARB certified Tier II standards. AQ-3: The proposed Comprehensive Land Use Update in- cludes numerous policies aimed at reducing vehicle travel through land use planning, encouraging alternatives modes of transportation and use of project level review to reduce air pollutant emissions from vehicle travel. AQ-4: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-34 through 4.3-41 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. Party Responsible for Implementation Development Services Depart- ment Development Services Department Development Services Department Implementation Timing The City's Munici- pal Code will be revised within 24 months (Condition of approval for interim applicable projects prior to adoption of the ordinance.) Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City City of National City City of National City Monitoring Action Draft and adopt ordinance to amend the City's Municipal Code Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures Monitoring Frequency Once Once Once AQ-5: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR pages 4.3-34 through 4.3-41 and 4.3-1 through 4.3-15, as modified in the Final EIR. Development Services Department Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures Once Biological Resources 6-3 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING TABLE 6- I PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-1: In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migra- tory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding sea- son, defined as from January 15' to August 31" of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory California gnat - catcher. In order to determine presence/absence of California gnatcatchers, protocol surveys of suitable areas of habitat (DCSS) on -site are required. These must be completed by an approved biologist in possession of a Section 10(a) Recovery Permit for this species. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting sur- vey of all areas within 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wildlife agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and recommendations. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Development Services Department Monitoring Action Perform site in- spections, review protocol survey reports, and pre - construction sur- vey reports to verify compliance; submit pre - construction sur- vey report to City of National City, CDFG, and USFWS for con- currence with conclusions and recommendations; submit periodic reports as re- quired. If active nests are found, submit periodic monitoring re- ports. Monitoring Frequency Once or if nesting birds found, peri- odic monitor- ing until fledglings have left the nest BIO-2: Impacts to DCSS shall require mitigation at a mini- mum 2:1 ratio. Therefore, impacts to 1.2 acres of DCSS will require 2.4 acres of mitigation. This mitigation could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration in the Butterfly Garden and/or other areas of the site. In order for on -site habitat creation and restoration to be acceptable as DCSS City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vi- sion Concept Plan City of National City Submit Revegeta- tion Plan to City of National City, CDFG and USFWS for ap- proval, review; Periodically, as defined in the Revegeta- tion Plan 6-4 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION M O N I I O R I N G AND R L P O R 1 I N G PROGRAM TABLE 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures mitigation, these activities would need to occur pursuant to a City and resource agencies (CDFG, USFWS) approved Revegetation Plan. The Revcgetation Plan would be imple- mented by the City and would require a methodology for how to establish DCSS in that arca. The Revegetation Plan would be required to comply with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within K00 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be permitted during the spring/summer songbird breeding season, defined as from January 156 to August 31" of each year. Party Responsible for Implementation 6-5 Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency projects review periodic revegetation plan reports; perform site inspections to verify compliance CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR M I I I G A I ION MONITORING AND REPORTING TABLE 6- I PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-3: Impacts to the DFWW shall require mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio in the following manner: at least 1:1 shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. For example, impacts to 0.8 acre of DFWW would require 2.4 acres of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on - site, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the on -site drainage. It should be noted that if these habitat restoration activities would result in any significant impacts, these impacts would be required to be analyzed and mitigated. Significant impacts associated with habitat restoration activities could include dredging in jurisdictional waters or wetlands, the re- moval of native vegetation, noise impacts to native wildlife during site preparation. In order for habitat restoration to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be sub- ject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitiga- tion Plan. Such a plan would be implemented by the City and it would specify methodology for habitat creation and restora- tion. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 2.4 acre -credits of FWW in an approved mitiga- tion bank. Regulatory Agencies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or offsite res- toration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan projects Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for construction of Las Palmas Park and facilities Vision Concept Plan Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Monitoring Action Submit Wetland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USACE, CDFG, and RWQCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion, submit re- port verifying acquisition of approved mitiga- tion bank credits. Monitoring Frequency Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation bank credits for offsite mitiga- tion. 6-6 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION M O N I T O R I N G AND 3 E P O R T I N G TABLE 6-I PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-4: Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as Non -Vegetated Channel (NVC) located in the middle of the existing golf course on the Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan site„ generally require mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this typically must consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restora- tion/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.1-acre of NVC would require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via habitat creation and restoration activities in the on -site drainage. In order for these activities to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to he subject to a City and Resource Agency - approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0.3 acre -credits of NVC in an approved mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agen- cies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow applicants to propose either on- or off -site restoration, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan projects. Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for construction of for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vi- sion Concept Plan projects. Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Monitoring Action Submit Wetland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USACE, CDFG, and RWQCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion, submit re- port verifying acquistion of ap- proved mitigation bank credits. Monitoring Frequency Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation bank credits for offsite mitiga- tion. BIO-5: Impacts to Disturbed Southern Coastal Salt Marsh (DSCSM) , within Paradise Creek in the southern portion of the Kimball Park Master Plan site, require mitigation at a minimum 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.1-acre of DSCSM shall require 0.3-acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site, via the res- toration of Paradise Creek, including the daylighting of the City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan projects. Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits City of National City Submit Wetland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USACE, CDFG, and RWQCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation bank 6-7 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TAB, F 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Agency Responsible for Timing Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency portion of the creek that is currently underground. The pro- ject's current conceptual design shows approximately 3.9 acres as being available for Paradise Creek improvements. In order for these improvements to be acceptable as wetlands mitiga- tion, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securement of 0.9 acre - credits of SCSM in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typi- cally allow applicants to propose either on- or offsite restora- tion, although on -site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not available, offsite mitigation within the same drainage basin is required. 6-8 odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion, submit re- port verifying acquisition of approved mitiga- tion bank credits. credits for offsite mitiga- tion. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REFORIING TABLE 6- I PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-6: Impacts to wetlands habitats, such as DFWW located within Paradise Creek on the Kimball Park Master Plan site„ require mitigation at a 3:1 ratio. At least 1:1 of this ratio shall consist of wetlands creation; the remaining 2:1 may consist of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3- acre of DFWW shall require 0.9-acre of mitigation. Mitiga- tion for impacts to these habitat -types could occur on -site. The project site has approximately 3.9 acres available for Paradise Creek improvements. In order for these improve- ments to be acceptable as wetlands mitigation, they would need to be subject to a City and Resource Agency -approved Wetland Mitigation Plan. Alternatively, mitigation could occur off -site, via the securetnent of 0.3 acre -credits of FW W in an approved wetland mitigation bank. The Regulatory Agencies (USAGE, CDFG, RWQCB) typically allow appli- cants to propose either on- or off -site restoration, although on - site mitigation is encouraged. If on -site mitigation is not avail- able, off -site mitigation within the same drainage basin is re- quired. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Kimball Park Mas- ter Plan Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City/CDFG Monitoring Action Submit Wetland Mitigation Plan to City of National City, USACE, CDFG, and RWQCB for ap- proval, review. For on -site mitiga- tion, review peri- odic revegetation plan reports; per- form site inspec- tions to verify compliance. For offsite mitiga- tion, submit re- port verifying acquisition of approved mitiga- tion bank credits. Monitoring Frequency Periodically, as defined in the Wetland Mitigation Plan; or once, for acquisi- tion of miti- gation bank credits for offsite mitiga- tion. 6-9 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING TABLE 6-1 PROGRAM MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures BIO-7: Because the proposed Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan project will impact state wetlands and State and federal "waters," it may be necessary to obtain cer- tain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project ap- proval. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notification of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evi- dence that such notification is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has obtained a 1600-series Streambed Altera- tion Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. Party Responsible for Implementation City of National City/Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Concept Plan Implementation Timing Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for construction of for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vi- sion Concept Plan projects. Agency Responsible for Monitoring City of National City Monitoring Action Provide copies of CWA 404/401 and/or Fish and Game Code 1600 permits, or proof that such permits are not required Monitoring Frequency Once prior to issuance of each demoli- tion, grading or building permit. BIO-8: (a) Mitigation for wetland impacts associated with improve- ments to Kimball Park will require a 1:1 ratio of wetlands creation and 2:1 ratio of wetlands restoration/enhancement. Therefore, impacts to 0.3 acre of DFWW would require 0.9 acre of mitigation and impacts to 0.1 acre of DSCSM would require 0.3 acre of mitigation. Mitigation for impacts to these habitat -types could occur onsite, via the restoration of Para- dise Creek or offsite through contribution to an approved mitigation bank. Because the proposed Kimball Park Master Plan project will impact State wetlands and State and federal "waters," it will likely be necessary to obtain certain regulatory agency permits as a condition of project implementation. To that end, it is required that the applicant provide to the City proof of notifi- cation of the ACOE and CRWQCB regarding Clean Water Act Section 404/401 Permits, or evidence that such notifica- City of National City/Project Developer for Kimball Park Mas- ter Plan Prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits for Kimball Park Master Plan City of National City (a) Provide copies of CWA 404/401 and/or Fish and Game Code 1600 permits, or proof that such permits are not required (b) Perform peri- odic site inspec- tions to verify compliance; sub- mit preconstruc- tion survey re- ports to City, CDFG and USFWS for con- currence with (a)Once for permits or evidence that per- mits are not re- quiredi and (b) If nest- ing birds found, pe- riodic monitoring until fledg- lings have left the nest 6-10 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TABLE 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures tion is not required. Also required prior to project approval shall be proof provided to the City that the applicant has ob- tained a 1600-series Streambcd Alteration Agreement with the CDFG, or proof that such an agreement is not required. (b) In order to reduce or avoid impacts to special status birds, and ensure project compliance with the Federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, 3511, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, site brushing, grading, and/or the removal of vegetation within 500 feet of any known migratory songbird nesting location will not be per- mitted during the spring/summer song bird breeding season, defined as from January 15th to August 31st of each year. Limiting activities to the non -breeding season will minimize chances for the incidental take of migratory songbirds. Should it be necessary to conduct brushing, grading, or other habitat -removal activities during the songbird breeding season, a pre -construction nesting survey of all areas within 500 feet of the proposed activity will be required. If active nests are present on -site, the nests shall be monitored until the birds have fledged and left the nest, prior to the commencement of construction activities. The results of the pre -construction survey will be provided in a report to the City and the wild- life agencies for concurrence with the conclusions and rec- ommendations. Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency conclusions and recommendations; if active nests are present, submit periodic monitor- ing reports 6-II CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION M O NI t ORI NG AND REPORTING PROGRAM TABLE 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures Hazards and Hazardous Materials Party Responsible for Implementation Implementation Agency Responsible for Timing Monitoring Monitoring Action Monitoring Frequency HAZ-1: Implementation of a new General Plan Policy S-8.4 shall require proposed development to determine the applica- bility of preparing a Hazardous Materials Management Plan (HMMP), stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP), Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan, (SUSWMP), Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP), stormwater Best Management Practices, and additional site - specific assessment including research, file reviews, and or Phase I Environmental Assessments. City of National City Concurrent with project approval Development Services Department Verification of policy implemen- tation. Once Hydrology and Water Quality HYDRO-1: National City shall incorporate into its General Plan Policy CS-5.3 to require the City to regularly assess the adequacy of its storm sewer system to accommodate 100-year storm flows and develop and implement a prioritized plan to address identified capacity deficiencies to the MEP. HYDRO-2a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydro- logical study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surround- ing area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to ac- commodate 100-year flood flows on site. Measures to accom- modate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPS such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. HYDRO-2b: National City shall incorporate feasible meas- ures identified in the detailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. City of National City Project Developer for Senior Village Expansion Concurrent with project approval Development Services Department During project Development Services review, prior to Department issuance of demoli- tion, grading, or building permits for the Senior Vil- lage Expansion Verification of policy implemen- tation. Undertake de- tailed hydrological study to assess effects of proposed development on base flood eleva- tions; and perform periodic site in- spections to verify implementation of any required measures (BMPs) Once Once prior to issuance of demolition, During con- struction period 6-12 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORIING PROGRAM (ABLE 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Party Responsible Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Measures for Implementation Timing Monitoring Action Frequency from the hydro- logical study. HYDRO-3a: National City shall undertake a detailed hydro- logical study to assess the effects of proposed development on base flood elevations on the project site and in the surround- ing area and to identify a range of measures sufficient to ac- commodate 100-year flood flows on site. Measures to ac- commodate flood flows could include creek modification and stormwater management BMPS such as bio-swales, retention ponds, and rain gardens. HYDRO-3b: National City shall incorporate feasible meas- ures identified in the detailed hydrological study into the final project site design so as to ensure that, at a minimum, base flood elevation would not rise either on- or off -site. Land Usc Project Developer for Las Palmas Park and Facilities Vision Con- cept Plan During project review, prior to issuance of demoli- tion, grading, or building permits Development Services Department Perform periodic site inspections to verify compliance During con- struction period LU-1: The inclusion of policies to the General Plan related to development review would reduce impacts associated with conflicts with the MSCP in the vicinity of the Planning area. The addition of Policy OS-2.7 would ensure that potential impacts to biological resources are carefully evaluated prior to approval of development projects. The addition of Policy OS- 2.8 would ensure that development is consistent with all fed- eral, State and regional regulations for habitat and species pro- tection. City of National City Concurrent with project approval Development Services Department Verification of policy implemen- tation. Once Noise NOI-1: Implement Construction Noise Reduction Measures. Title 12 of the Municipal Code shall be amended to include the following standard construction City of National City 6-13 The City's Munici- Development Services pal Code will be Department revised within 24 Draft and adopt ordinance to amend the City's Once CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR M I T I G A I ION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM TABLE 6-1 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures noise reduction measures. • Equipment Sound Attenuation. All noise -producing construction equipment and vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers, air - inlet silencers where appropriate, and any other shrouds, shields, or other noise -reducing features in good operat- ing condition that meet or exceed original factory speci- fication. Mobile or fixed "package" equipment (e.g. arc welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readily available for that type of equipment. • Use of Electrical Equipment. Electrically powered equip- ment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal com- bustion powered equipment, where feasible. • Distance from Sensitive Receptors. Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and mainte- nance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise -sensitive receptors. • Construction Traffic Speeds. Construction site and access road speed limits shall be established and enforced during the construction period. • Use of Noise -Producing Signals. The use of noise produc- ing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be for safety warning purposes only. • Use of Public Address or Music Systems. No project - related public address or music system shall be audible at any adjacent sensitive receptor. • Noise Complaint Process. The on -site construction super- visor shall have the responsibility and authority to receive and resolve noise complaints. A clear appeal process to the Party Responsible for Implementation 6-14 Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency months (Condition Municipal Code of approval for interim applicable projects prior to adoption of the ordinance.) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MO N ITO RI NC AND REPORTING PROGRAM TARLF 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures owner shall be established prior to construction com- mencement that will allow for resolution of noise problems that cannot be immediately solved by the site supervisor. NOISE-2: Implementation of new General Plan Policy NN- 1.10 would call for a study to demonstrate that ground borne vibration issues associated with rail operations are adequately addressed for new development within 100 feet from the cen- terline of the railroad tracks. Party Responsible for Implementation Development Services Depart- ment Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Timing Monitoring Action Frequency Prior to project approval City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation. Once NOISE-3: Detailed "Crack Survey." Prior to approval of final site design, any project proponent that would propose driving pilings or performing an action that could cause substantial vibrations shall perform a detailed "crack survey" before the startup of construction activities. If pile driving would be the source of these vibrations, pre foundation pile holes should be pre -drilled to the extent feasible to minimize the number of hammer strikes required to seat the pile. The survey may be done by photographs, videotape, or visual inventory, and should include inside as well as outside locations. All existing cracks and walls, floors, driveways, etc., should be docu- mented with sufficient detail for comparison after construc- tion to determine whether actual vibration damage has oc- curred. If damage is found, the project application would be required to compensate for such damages. Transportation and Circulation Development Services Depart- ment The City's Mu- nicipal Code will be revised within 24 months (Condi- tion of approval for interim applicable projects prior to adoption of the ordinance. City of National City Draft and adopt ordinance to amend the City's Municipal Code Once 6- 15 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION MONITORING AND REFORTING PROGRAM TABLE 6-I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Mitigation Measures TRANS-1: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.13-12, and 4.13-6 through 4.3-10, and pages 4.13-46 through 4.13-69, as modified in the Final EIR. Party Responsible Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring for Implementation Timing Monitoring Action Frequency Development Services Ongoing and dur- City of National City Verification of Ongoing Department ing subsequent policy implemen- project-level tation and project- CEQA review specific mitigation measures. TRANS-2: No mitigation required. As part of the County of San Diego's Draft General Plan Update, Sweetwater Road is planned as a four -lane facility in 2030. This would reduce impacts to a less -than -significant level in 2030. Between Na- tional City city limits (Plaza Bonita Center Way) and Wil- low Street has been identified as a roadway segment where LOS E or F is acceptable, since adding travel lanes would result in adverse environmental impacts. As part of ongoing multi -jurisdictional programs such as Regional Arterial Management System (RAMS) and Traffic Light Synchronization Program (TSLP), the cities of Na- tional City and Chula Vista and Caltrans will continue to implement coordinated traffic signal timing along the Na- tional City Boulevard/Broadway Avenue corridor to im- prove traffic flow and progression. These implementation measures will ensure that impacts associated with increased congestion levels are less than significant. TRANS-3: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described in DEIR Table 4.13-12, and 4.13-6 through 4.3-10, and pages 4.13-69 through 4.13-78, as modified in the Final EIR. Development Services Department Development Services Department Ongoing City of National City Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures. Ongoing Ongoing 6-16 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE UPDATE FINAL EIR MITIGATION `ION I I O RI NG AND REPORTING PROGRAM TABLE 6- I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (CONTINUED) Party Responsible Implementation Agency Responsible for Monitoring Monitoring Mitigation Measures for Implementation Timing Monitoring Action Frequency Utilities and Service Systems UTILS-1: The project includes self mitigating goals, policies, implementation measures, and the "Regulatory Framework" described on DEIR pages 4.14-36 through 4.14-40, 4.14-45 through 4.14-46, as modified in the Final EIR. Development Services Department Ongoing and dur- ing subsequent project -level CEQA review City of National City Verification of policy implemen- tation and project - specific mitigation measures. Ongoing UTILS-2: Adopt a new General Plan policy to require the City of National City shall conduct hydraulic modeling analy- sis to assess the impacts of the additional wastewater that would be generated with implementation of the Regulatory Changes and revise or re -prioritize the Recommended Capital Improvement Program contained in the SSMP as necessary in order to ensure that the City's wastewater collection system would have sufficient capacity to accommodate growth in the planning area, including the Development Proposals, through 2030. Development Services Depart- ment Adoption of the General Plan City of National City Perform hydraulic modeling analysis to assess the im- pacts of additional wastewater and revise or repriori- tize recommended Capital Improve- ment Program. Once 6-17