HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 6-2000, PD-2000-2RESOLUTION NO. 06-2000
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING AUTO
DEALERSHIP AT 3131 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
APPLICANT: RUDOLPH F. ERM, JR.
CASE FILE NO. PD-2000-2
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Planned
Development Permit application to allow the expansion of an auto dealership at 3131 National
City Boulevard at a duly advertised public hearing held on April 3, 2000, at which time oral and
documentary evidence was presented; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report
contained in Case File No. PD-2000-2 and a Notice of Exemption maintained by the City and
incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State
law and City law; and,
WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of
public health, safety, and general welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission
at the public hearing held on April 3, 2000, support the following findings:
1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the 106,286 square
foot lot contains ample room to accommodate the 2,010 square foot addition.
2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since
the project involves a change to an existing structure that will not affect the use of the
property or traffic at the site.
3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties,
since there is no change in use proposed and the remodeling project will enhance the
appearance of the property.
4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and
welfare, since General Plan goals and policies promote high -quality commercial
development in order to generate the greatest public benefit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Planned Development Permit is
approved subject to the following conditions:
1. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998
California Building, Electrical, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title
24 handicapped and energy regulations.
2. A trash enclosure shall be provided in accordance with City standards. It shall have a
stucco exterior finish to match the building.
3. Before this Planned Development Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the
property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the
Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the
approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within
30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit. The
applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a
Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant
shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide
information that conditions imposed by approval of Planned Development Permit are
binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice
of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning
Director prior to recordation.
4. Use authorized by this Planned Development Permit shall be limited to expansion of an
existing auto dealership in conformance with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-2000-2, dated Feb.
29, 2000.
5. Except as required by conditions of approval, plans for future permits shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit A, Case File No.
PD-2000-2, dated Feb. 29, 2000.
6. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the
resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section
18.116.190 of the Municipal Code.
7. Employee parking space #9 shall be relocated to comply with minimum parking
requirements.
8. A Coastal Development Permit is required prior to issuance of Building Permits for the
project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to
the applicant and to the City Council.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on
the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for
review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of
that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the
Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing.
CERTIFICATION:
This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of
April 17, 2000 by the following vote:
AYES: UNGAB, PARKA, VALDERRAMA, BACA, MARTINELLI, DETZER.
NAYS:
ABSENT: GODSHALK
ABSTAIN:
Ups
CHAIRMAN