Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDraft Agenda Packet - 01-22-19 CC HA AgendaAGENDA OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — HOUSING AUTHORITY OFTHE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALIFORNIA NATIONAL My �+QOORPORATfi ALEJANDRA SOTELO-SOLIS Mayor RON MORRISON Vice Mayor JERRY CANO Councilmemher MONA RIOS Councilmemher 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 619-336-4240 Meeting agendas and minutes available on web WWW.NATIONALCITYCA. GOV COUNCIL CHAMBERS CIVIC CENTER 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2019 — 6:00 PM ORDER OF BUSINESS: Public sessions of all Regular Meetings of the City Council / Community Development Commission - Housing Authority (hereafter referred to as Elected Body) begin at 6:00 p.m. on the first and third Tuesday of each month. Public Hearings begin at 6:00 p.m. unless otherwise noted. Closed Meetings begin in Open Session at 5:00 p.m. or such other time as noted, and after announcing closed session items, convenes into a Closed Meeting. If a workshop is scheduled, the subject and time of the workshop will appear on the agenda. The Mayor and Council members also sit as the Chairperson and Members of the Board of the Community Development Commission (CDC). REPORTS: All open session agenda items and reports as well as all documents and writings distributed to the Elected Body less than 72 hours prior to the meeting, are available for review at the entry to the Council Chambers. Regular Meetings of the Elected Body are webcast and archived on the City's website www.nationalcityca.gov. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Prior to the Business portion of the agenda, the Elected Body will receive public comments regarding any matters within the jurisdiction of the City and/or the Community Development Commission. Members of the public may also address any item on the agenda at the time the item is considered by the Elected Body. Persons who wish to address the Elected Body are requested to fill out a "Request to Speak" form available at the entrance to the City Council Chambers, and turn in the completed form to the City Clerk. The Mayor or Chairperson will separately call for testimony of those persons who have turned in a "Request to Speak" form. If you wish to speak, please step to the podium at the appropriate time and state your name and address (optional) for the record. The time limit established for public testimony is three minutes per speaker unless a different time limit is announced. Speakers are encouraged to be brief. The Mayor or Chairperson may limit the length of comments due to the number of persons wishing to speak or if comments become repetitious or irrelevant. WRITTEN AGENDA: With limited exceptions, the Elected Body may take action only upon items appearing on the written agenda. Items not appearing on the agenda must be brought back on a subsequent agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature, and the need to take action on such items arose after the agenda was posted. CONSENT CALENDAR: Consent calendar items involve matters which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent items are 1 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 2 adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. Upon request, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (619) 336-4228 to request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24-hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Spanish audio interpretation is provided during Elected Body Meetings. Audio headphones are available in the lobby at the beginning of the meeting. Audio interpretacion en espanol se proporciona durante sesiones del Consejo Municipal. Los audiofonos estan disponibles en el pasillo al principio de la junta. Spanish to English interpretation services are available to members of the public who wish to speak to the City Council during the meeting. "Request to Speak" forms requesting interpretation must be filed within the first two hours of the meeting. Espanol a los servicios de interpretacion Ingles de audio esta disponibles para los miembros del public() que desean hablar con el Ayuntamiento durante del Consejo Municipal. "Solicitud para hablar de" formas solicitud de interpretacion deben ser presentadas dentro de las dos primeras horas del Consejo Municipal. COUNCIL REQUESTS THAT ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS BE TURNED OFF DURING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS. 2 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 3 OPEN TO THE PUBLIC A. CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG PUBLIC COMMENTS (THREE -MINUTE TIME LIMIT) PROCLAMATIONS 1. First 2019 Baby Born in San Diego County from National City 2. Human Trafficking Awareness Month AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS PRESENTATIONS 1. Introduction of New Employee - Karim Galeana, Finance Manager. (Finance) 4. Retiree Service Recognition - Tiny Tots teachers Debbie Shinn and Sharon Johnson. (Community Services) 5. Presentation on National City's Safe Routes to School Program - Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego. (Engineering/Public Works) 6. Road to 2020 Census - Roberto Garcia, Partnership Specialist, San Diego County, U.S. Census Bureau. (City Manager) 7. Summary of "A Kimball Holiday" held on December 7 and 8, 2018. (Community Services) INTERVIEWS / APPOINTMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 8. Motion of the City Council of the City of National City approving the waiving of the reading of the text of the Ordinances considered at this meeting and providing that such Ordinances shall be introduced and/or adopted after a reading of the title only. (City Clerk) 3 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 4 9. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City of July 17, 2018 and the Adjourned Regular Meetings of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City of July 18, 2018 and July 24, 2018. (City Clerk) 10. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a First Amendment to the Agreement with Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego to provide support services for National City's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program, increasing the not -to -exceed amount of the Agreement by $300,000, for a total Agreement amount of $600,000, and extending the term of the Agreement to February 15, 2022; and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Amendment to Agreement. (Engineering/Public Works) 11. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting and approving the recordation of a grant deed from Silvergate Plaza Investors, LLC for a Street Easement for a portion of Plaza Boulevard located at 1640 E. Plaza Boulevard (APN 557-410-20). (Engineering/Public Works) 12. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting an updated Quality Assurance Program (QAP) that provides sampling and testing procedures to ensure that materials incorporated into construction projects are in conformance with the contract specifications and Caltrans requirements for federal -aid projects. (Engineering/Public Works) 13. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a two- year Agreement with Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc., DBA; Rely Environmental for a not -to -exceed amount of $300,000 to provide on -call environmental compliance management services involving water quality, air quality, and hazardous materials; and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement. (Engineering/Public Works) 14. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the Squad Program as a permanent emergency service delivery model for the National City Fire Department. (Fire) 15. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City to waive the bid process pursuant to NCMC 2.60.220(B) for the sole source purchase of 24 sets of turnout gear from Allstar Fire Equipment in the amount of $61,000.59 for the purchase for the National City Fire Department. (Fire) 16. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City for 1) authorizing a new agreement between the City Of National City and Meyers Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, a Professional Law Corporation for legal services in the specialized area of labor law not to exceed the dollar amount of 4 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 5 $100,000 of which $37,000 will cover services incurred in 2018, 2) approving an increase of $60,000 to the General Fund Non -Departmental Professional Services appropriation and use of General Fund fund balance. (Human Resouces) 17. Temporary Use Permit — Inflatable Event hosted by Fun Inflatable Slides at Westfield Plaza Bonita Mall from March 1, 2019 thru August 25, 2019 with no waiver of fees. (Neighborhood Services) 18. Warrant Register #21 for the period of 11/14/18 through 11/20/18 in the amount of $1,955,739.55. (Finance) 19. Warrant Register #22 for the period of 11/21/18 through 11/27/18 in the amount of $305,820.31. (Finance) 20. Warrant Register #23 for the period of 11/28/18 through 12/04/18 in the amount of $4,411,033.38. (Finance) 21. Warrant Register #24 for the period of 12/05/18 through 12/11/18 in the amount of $1,328,774.64. (Finance) PUBLIC HEARINGS: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS 22. Public Hearing to consider Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City adopted pursuant to Government Code Sections 36931, 36937, and 65858 as an Urgency Measure to take effect immediately, amending National City Municipal Code Chapters 10.70 and 10.79 of Title 10 (Public Peace, Morals and Safety) and Section 18.30.030 of Title 18 (Adult Oriented Businesses) related to Massage Businesses. (City Attorney) 23. Adoption of an Urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City adopted pursuant to Government Code Sections 36931, 36937, and 65858 as an Urgency Measure to take effect immediately, amending National City Municipal Code Chapters 10.70 and 10.79 of Title 10 (Public Peace, Morals and Safety) and Section 18.30.030 of Title 18 (Adult Oriented Businesses) related to Massage Businesses. (City Attorney) 24. Public Hearing and Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, approving a General Plan Amendment and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) in order to construct a 29-unit residential development and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 GPA, S) (Planning) 5 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 6 25. Introduction of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City, California, approving a Zone Change from Small Lot Residential (RS- 2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) for a 29-unit residential development property at property located at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 ZC) Planning) NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS 26. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City amending City Council Policy #901, entitled "Management of Real Property" to clarify procedures for the disposition of surplus real property and for the sale, lease, and rental of City -owned real property. (Housing and Economic Development) NEW BUSINESS 27. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, making a Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) in order to construct a 29-unit residential development and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 IS) (Planning) 28. Notice of Decision — Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit for beer and wine sales at an existing restaurant (Los Tito's) located at 917 South Euclid Avenue. (Danny Damian) (Case File 2018-13 CUP) (Planning) 29. Presentation of the City of National City's fiscal year 2020 budget priorities. B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - HOUSING AUTHORITY CONSENT RESOLUTIONS - HOUSING AUTHORITY PUBLIC HEARINGS: RESOLUTIONS - HOUSING AUTHORITY NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS - HOUSING AUTHORITY NEW BUSINESS - HOUSING AUTHORITY C. REPORTS STAFF REPORTS 6 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 7 30. Update on Port of San Diego Activity (City Manager) MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION REPORT ADJOURNMENT Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City - Tuesday - January 29, 2019 - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chamber - National City, California. Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City - Tuesday - February 5, 2019 - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chamber - National City, California. 7 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 8 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: First 2019 Baby Born in San Diego County from National City Please scroll down to view the backup material. 8 of 473 Item # 01/22/19 First 2019 Baby Born in San Diego County from National City Proclamation Forthcoming 9 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1 /22/2019 — Page 10 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Human Trafficking Awareness Month Please scroll down to view the backup material. 10 of 473 Item # 01/22/19 Human Trafficking Awareness Month Proclamation Forthcoming 11 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 12 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Introduction of New Employee - Karim Galeana, Finance Manager. (Finance) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 12 of 473 Item # 01/22/19 Introduction of New Employee — Karim Galeana, Finance Manager (Finance) 13 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 14 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Retiree Service Recognition - Tiny Tots teachers Debbie Shinn and Sharon Johnson. (Community Services) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 14 of 473 Item # 1/22/19 Retiree Service Recognition - Tiny Tots teachers Debbie Shinn and Sharon Johnson. (Community Services) 15 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 16 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Presentation on National City's Safe Routes to School Program - Rady Children's Hospital - San Diego. (Engineering/Public Works) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 16 of 473 ITEM NO. 1/22/19 PRESENTATION ON NATIONAL CITY'S SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PROGRAM Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego (Engineering/Public Works) 17 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 18 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Road to 2020 Census - Roberto Garcia, Partnership Specialist, San Diego County, U.S. Census Bureau. (City Manager) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 18 of 473 Item # 01/22/19 ROAD TO 2020 CENSUS Roberto Garcia, Partnership Specialist San Diego County U.S. Census Bureau 19 of 473 Road t0212,I United States Census Bureau Roberto Garcia Partnership Specialist - U.S. Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 20 of 473 2020 Census United States Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 21 of 473 Why Do a Census ■ Article 1, Section 2 of the US Constitution The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. ■ Key Purpose is Apportioning the US House of Representatives United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 22 of 473 Why does the 2020 Census matter? People United States'" Census Bureau • Congressional representation • Reapportionment & redistricting • $675 Billion distributed annually • Funding based on population • Over $76 Billion each year to the State —Th • $2,000 approx. per Californian counted*_ U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 23 of 473 Federal Funding Census data informs how $76 billion is distributed annually among local, state, and tribal governments for programs like: Program Medicaid Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Schools (Title 1 Grants, National Lunch School Program, Head Start/Early Start) Housing Choice Vouchers Highway Planning and Construction Senior & Foster Care Centers United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov $44,240,036,248 $7,528,039,778 $4,274,492,934 $3,40,189,000 $3,212,534,538 $1,286,852,000 24 of 473 Goals for 2020 Census ■ Maintain Data Quality ■ Areas of Innovation ➢Accurate Address List ➢ Easier Ways to Respond ➢ Better Use of Information ➢ Efficient Field Operations United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 25 of 473 March 23, 2020 Internet Phone Paper Form In -person *13 languages including English will be supported United States Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 26 of 473 Impact to National City United Stautess'" Cen Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 27 of 473 Impact to National City 71% National City Census Mail Participation Rate in 2010 18,000 National City Folk Requiring follow-up by Census enumerator in 2010 United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 28 of 473 Impact to National City 600 Estimated net undercount in 2020 based on 2010 Census $ 1,950* Potential per person Federal funds available $ 1.2 Million Amount of Money National City stands to gain or lose over the next decade United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 29 of 473 Impact to National City ■ 5 hard to count census tracks with a population of 29,000 ■ Participation rate is lower than 70% .... .... .... •. United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 30 of 473 Response Outreach Area Mapper (ROAM) ♦ I Use dropdown to search 32°41'06"N 117°02'13"W United States ' Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census goy www.census.gov/roam of Chula Vista, SanGIS, Bureau of Land Management, Esri, 31 of 473 Hard -to -Count Populations Communities of Color Children under 5 Persons who do not speak English fluently LGBTQ+ People with disabilities People Rural experiencing Tribal members Communities homelessness United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov Undocumented Immigrants .... .... •. 32 of 473 How can we work together to ensure a complete court in 2020? United States Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 33 of 473 You can help ■ Identify community organizations in your city that work directly with hard -to -count populations ■ Incorporate census education efforts into existing community engagements ■ Leverage existing infrastructure and resources ■ Initiate a resolution by city council to support the Census effort • • •• •• •• •• • • •. United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov .. .. 34 of 473 We arE: 2020 Census Jobs www.census.gov/fieldjobs www.usajobs.gov www.2020census.gov/jobs 1-888-658-5564 (RCC recruiting hotline) United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 35 of 473 Community Partnership and Engagement Program Enroll community partners to increase participation in the 2020 Census of those who are less likely to respond or are often missed. • Educate people about the 2020 Census and foster cooperation with enumerators • Encourage community partners to motivate people to self -respond • Engage grass roots organizations to reach out to hard to count groups and those who aren't motivated to respond to the national campaign United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 11111111 36 of 473 Complete Count Committees • Tribal, state and local governments work together with partners in their communities to form CCCs to promote the 2020 Census to their constituents. • Committee members in CCs are: • Trusted Messengers • Leaders in respective industry • Partners between community and government United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 37 of 473 Suggested CCC Membership SUGGESTED MUNICIPAL CCC MEMBERSHIP Heads of Regional Associations Council Members from Priority Target Areas 111 State CCC Representative 'Partnership Specialist is advisor and Census liasion to Municipal CCC's United States" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov Heads of Public School System r Mayor or Designee (Chair) r Heads of Relevant Government Agencies and Departments 0 r Deputy Executive Heads of Director Director Business Associations Heads of Community Organizations • Representatives from 111 Faith -Based Organizations Heads of Large Universities / Colleges 38 of 473 Timeline —Key Communications ■ The 2020 Census Phases ■ Education Phase — 2018-2019 ■ Awareness Phase — April 2019 ■ Motivation Phase — March — May 2020 ■ Reminder Phase — May — July 2020 ■ Thank You Phase — Starts July 2020 ■ Local governments and community leaders throughout National City participate in activities highlighting the message that the 2020 Census is imminent and that it is easy, important and safe to participate United States'" Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 111111111 39 of 473 Questions ? United States Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov 40 of 473 United States'" Census Bureau Contact Roberto Garcia Partnership Specialist, San Diego Region Roberto.Garcia@2020census.gov (619) 701-2098 U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov IMMINEK 41 of 473 References Hard to Count Tracts: https://www.census.gov/roam Participation Rate: https://www.census.gov/censusexplorer/2010ratemap.html?# Population: https://www.sandag.org/ Congressional districts undercount: Each of California's congressional districts contains at least one census tract where more than 29% of residents are likely to be undercounted, according to the analysis. http://www.govtech.com/data/Millions-of-Californians-Might-Go-Uncounted- United States Census Bureau U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census gov nowb-Al' 42 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 43 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Summary of "A Kimball Holiday" held on December 7 and 8, 2018. (Community Services) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 43 of 473 Item # 1/22/19 Summary of A Kimball Holiday held on December 7 and 8, 2018. (Community Services) 44 of 473 Hosted by the City of National City — Community Services Department 1 45 of 473 C 4EIFORtJt1 JTIONA.L CI fl' 1Ssl �t& tbe n` f'i: on brd bc joTh and enj holicla wit fa friETrt r2en.t 2QjhP:s u ao.n Ilbe-el:r:c c4! ?ig Kimb�� 1�7N�eColiqd1 3 T"yam i3♦ez;�*: on . `ceniber -7th pith For cre nfor-Rn(1.3J. f. 1, it 61 Cornocha Kimball Pecreation Center Senior Conte 1810 Cast 22nd Street 1221 D Avenue November 24, 2018 December 1. 2018 10-O0am-12:00pm 10-O0am--12:00brr 2 46 of 473 r nt a Snow Hill Kids Activities ' ' Ice Skating Local Performances It Ferris Wheel Food Trucks Car Show Tree Lighting Ceremony g Santa's Village Mini Train Ride Kimball Park JOIN US FOR FREE HOLIDAY FUN FESTIVITIES! www.nationalcityca.gov/akimballholiday r �j..-cCaLIFoRNIFI -< WJO CiTIF 1NCOgPOg,ATED 3 47 of 473 Attractions 4 Entertainment City Of NationalCity 5 49 of 473 10 hours of Community Entertainment ❖ Capoeira Angola ❖ Grupo Folklorico Herencia Mexican Grupo ❖ Folklorico Las Florecitas ❖ Polynesian Dancing ❖ Jose and Andrik Guitar Duo ❖ Ed Music Inc. ❖ Boys and Girls Club Ballet Folklorico Dance Team ❖ Camacho Music & Guitar Group ❖ Camacho Hip Hop Group ❖ Fit, Tone & shake it! Zumba Group ❖ Verlosity Soul Line Dance Group ❖The Flyers 6 50 of 473 Birrieria Negro Durazo Saka Mayan Coffee Matua's Sushi In the Filling - Desserts 7 51 of 473 8 52 of 473 9 53 of 473 Marketing and Outreach • ATIONAL, CHOOL 'STRICT Zhe,an Diego UuiouVIribune NATIONALCITY Our Community aLrxn.waa.rh.. [,Mae1--e!.. gitrU Wes ass Snow Hill Ice Skating Ferris Wheel Car Show Santa•s Village Mini Train Rides Kids ACt1Ylt(OY Local PDrformanc.-.: Food Trucks Treo Lighting Ceremony Kimball Park JOIN US FOR FREE HOLIDAY FUN FESTVmESI W W W.natior.;a Santa's'Village Schedule 'rrlauy Salnrany • 4anpm-11: ppm • y:0 pnq:nupe REINDEER DASH SATURDAY DECEMBER WEB' AT 9:00 AM 4!% 1 MILE FUN FAMILY RUN/WALK REINDEER THEME') PHOTO AODT4I BREAKFAST AND PHOTOS WITH SANTA ARTS S CRAFTS FOR RIOS IIII•113711.11.1.0,115 1ST 11 w...ww n..===o::... LI CALIFORNIA 4ll.O NA.LL C'IT 'NCOrt P OTt.ATED 10 54 of 473 11 55 of 473 12 56 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 57 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Motion of the City Council of the City of National City approving the waiving of the reading of the text of the Ordinances considered at this meeting and providing that such Ordinances shall be introduced and/or adopted after a reading of the title only. (City Clerk) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 57 of 473 Item # 01/22/19 MOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE WAIVING OF THE READING OF THE TEXT OF THE ORDINANCES CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH ORDINANCES SHALL BE INTRODUCED AND/OR ADOPTED AFTER A READING OF THE TITLE ONLY. (City Clerk) 58 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 59 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City of July 17, 2018 and the Adjourned Regular Meetings of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City of July 18, 2018 and July 24, 2018. (City Clerk) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 59 of 473 Item # 01/22/19 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY OF JULY 17, 2018 AND THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY OF JULY 18, 2018 AND JULY 24, 2018. (City Clerk) 60 of 473 Book 100 / Page 130 07-17-2018 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY July 17, 2018 The Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City was called to order at 6:04 p.m. by Vice Mayor / Vice Chairman Albert Mendivil. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Council / Board members absent: Morrison. Administrative Officials present: Dalla, Deese, Denham, Duong, Manganiello, Mosley, Parra, Raulston, Rodriguez, Roberts, Vergara, Williams, Ybarra. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY MAYOR RON MORRISON PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals spoke on behalf of Mr. Earl McNeil, criticized the City's response and actions in the matter regarding Mr. McNeil, and demanded the release of information, reports, and video: Janice Luna-Reynoso, Amie Zamudio, Madge Torres, Anita Turner, Renita Payno, Mark Lane, Rick Bramhall, Steven Dorner, and Marie Little. A RECESS WAS CALLED AT 6:29 PM DUE TO DISRUPTIONS. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 6:48 PM. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Council / Board members absent: Morrison. A RECESS WAS CALLED AT 6:51 PM DUE TO CONTINUING DISRUPTIONS. THE COUNCIL CHAMBER WAS ORDERED TO BE CLEARED AND THE PUBLIC WAS ASKED TO LEAVE. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 7:10 PM. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Council / Board members absent: Morrison. VICE MAYOR MENDIVIL DEFERRED ALL REMAINING PUBLIC COMMENTS TO THE END OF MEETING. 1 61 of 473 Book 100 / Page 131 07-17-2018 AWARDS AND RECOGNITIONS COUNCIL MEETING PRESENTATIONS / AWARDS & RECOGNITIONS 2018 (102-10-13) 1. Employee of the Quarter 2018 - Police Officer Kyle Fitchhorn. (Police) 2. Life Saving Recognition for Captain Derek Jones and Firefighter Nicholas Black. (Fire) ACTION: This item was continued to a future meeting. PRESENTATIONS COUNCIL MEETING PRESENTATIONS / AWARDS & RECOGNITIONS 2018 (102-10-13) 3. Farewell to the 2017-2018 Miss National City Court and Introduction of the 2018-2019 Miss National City Court. (Community Services) CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR. Item No. 4 (NCMC), Item Nos. 5 through 13 (Resolution Nos. 2018-122 through 2018-130), Item No. 14 (Report), Item Nos. 15 and 16 (Warrant Registers). Motion by Cano, seconded by Rios, to approve the Consent Calendar. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. MUNICIPAL CODE 2018 (506-2-33) 4. MOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE WAIVING OF THE READING OF THE TEXT OF THE ORDINANCES CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH ORDINANCES SHALL BE INTRODUCED AND/OR ADOPTED AFTER A READING OF THE TITLE ONLY. (City Clerk) ACTION: Approved. See above. CONTRACT (C2013-31) 5. Resolution No. 2018-122. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE PUN GROUP, LLP FOR INDEPENDENT AUDITING SERVICES FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDING JUNE 30, 2018 TO JUNE 30, 2020 WITH THE OPTION TO EXTEND THE AGREEMENT FOR EACH OF THE TWO (2) SUBSEQUENT FISCAL YEARS. (Finance) ACTION: Adopted. See above. 2 62 of 473 Book 100 / Page 132 07-17-2018 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) CONTRACT (C2017-61) 6. Resolution No. 2018-123. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A FIRST AMENDMENT TO EXTEND THE AGREEMENT WITH COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC., FOR AN ADDITIONAL ONE (1) YEAR, TO PROVIDE HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING (HVAC) MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES AT CITY FACILITIES, WITH A CONTRACT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $170,412. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. CONTRACT (C2018-44) 7. Resolution No. 2018-124. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY 1) AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE PROGRAM SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT NO. R16 FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY ACCOUNT (SHA) FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000 THROUGH THE SYSTEMATIC SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PROGRAM (SSARP); 2) AUTHORIZING THE USE OF THE GENERAL FUND BALANCE TO PROVIDE MATCHING FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $10,000, AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (CALTRANS) FOR SSARP PROJECTS; AND 3) AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN ENGINEERING GRANTS FUND APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $90,000 AND A CORRESPONDING REVENUE BUDGET. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. CONTRACT (C2016-55) 8. Resolution No. 2018-125. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF FEDERAL ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION GRANT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $300,000, WITH NO MATCHING FUNDS REQUIRED, FOR THE NATIONAL CITY SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL (SRTS) PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL FUND APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $300,000 AND A CORRESPONDING REVENUE BUDGET FOR THE NATIONAL CITY SRTS PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS PROJECT. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. 3 63 of 473 Book 100 / Page 133 07-17-2018 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) TRAFFIC SIGN / SIGNAL ADMIN 2018-2019 (801-4-11) 9. Resolution No. 2018-126. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING AN INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF $70,000 TO THE GAS TAXES FUND APPROPRIATION (109-416-221-285-0000) AND USE OF GAS TAXES FUND BALANCE FOR PAYMENT OF TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. STREET VACATION ADMIN 2011 — 2020 (902-26-6) 10. Resolution No. 2018-127. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ACCEPTING AN EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THAT PORTION OF "A" AVENUE BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF EAST 28TH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF EAST 29TH STREET, TO BE VACATED FOR PUBLIC USE, BY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CERTIFICATION THEREOF EVIDENCING THE CITY'S CONSENT TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE EASEMENT. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. STREET VACATION ADMIN 2011 — 2020 (902-26-6) 11. Resolution No. 2018-128. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ACCEPTING A PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT FOR THAT PORTION OF "A" AVENUE BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF EAST 28TH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF EAST 29TH STREET, TO BE VACATED FOR PUBLIC USE, BY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CERTIFICATION THEREOF EVIDENCING THE CITY'S CONSENT TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE EASEMENT. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. STREET VACATION ADMIN 2011 — 2020 (902-26-6) 12. Resolution No. 2018-129. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ACCEPTING A GENERAL UTILITIES EASEMENT FOR THAT PORTION OF "A" AVENUE BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF EAST 28TH STREET AND THE NORTHERLY LINE OF EAST 29TH STREET, TO BE VACATED FOR PUBLIC USE, BY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE CERTIFICATION THEREOF EVIDENCING THE CITY'S CONSENT TO AND ACCEPTANCE OF THE EASEMENT. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. 4 64 of 473 Book 100 / Page 134 07-17-2018 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) CONTRACT (C2018-10) 13. Resolution No. 2018-130. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A RELOCATION PLAN AS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE AND REAL PROPERTY ACQUISITION POLICIES ACT OF 1970 AS AMENDED AND ANY OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS FOR THE RELOCATION OF TWO RESIDENTIAL TENANTS AND ONE COMMERCIAL TENANT LOCATED AT 302 W. 19TH STREET IN NATIONAL CITY FOR THE TOTAL NOT -TO -EXCEED AMOUNT OF $250,000; AND AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A SEWER SERVICE FUND APPROPRIATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $250,000 AND THE USE OF SEWER SERVICE FUND BALANCE. (Housing & Economic Development) ACTION: Adopted. See above. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT 2018-2019 (204-1-34) 14. Investment transactions for the month ended May 31, 2018. (Finance) ACTION: Approved. See above. WARRANT REGISTER JULY 2018 - JUNE 2019 (202-1-33) 15. Warrant Register #49 for the period of 05/30/18 through 06/05/18 in the amount of $4,131,984.66. (Finance) ACTION: Ratified. See above. 16. Warrant Register #50 for the period of 06/06/18 through 06/12/18 in the amount of $1,545,377.74. (Finance) ACTION: Ratified. See above. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS MUNICIPAL CODE 2018 (506-2-33) 17. Ordinance No. 2018-2448. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING TABLE 18.24.050 (ALLOWABLE LAND USES, MIXED -USE ZONES), TABLE 18.25.020 (ALLOWABLE LAND USES, INDUSTRIAL ZONES), AND SECTION 18.50.010 (GLOSSARY) TO PROVIDE FOR WINE TASTING ROOMS. (Applicant: City -Initiated Land Use Amendment) (Case File 2018-09 A) (Planning) (Companion Item #18) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the amendments to Title 18. TESTIMONY: John Borja, National City, spoke in support. Shane Parmely, La Jolla, spoke in opposition. 5 65 of 473 Book 100 / Page 135 07-17-2018 PUBLIC HEARINGS: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS (cont.) MUNICIPAL CODE 2018 (506-2-33) 17. Ordinance No. 2018-2448 (continued). ACTION: Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Cano, to close the Public Hearing. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Rios, to adopt the Ordinance. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS COUNCIL POLICY ADMIN (102-13-1) 18. Resolution No. 2018-131. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING CITY COUNCIL POLICY NO. 707, ENTITLED "ALCOHOL BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION REVIEW PROCESS AND ALCOHOL CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT STANDARDS" TO PROVIDE FOR THE OPERATION OF WINE TASTING ROOMS. (Applicant: City -Initiated Land Use Amendment) (Case File 2018-09 A) (Planning) (Companion Item #17) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the changes to Policy No. 707. TESTIMONY: Shane Parmely, La Jolla, spoke in opposition. ACTION: Motion by Rios, seconded by Mendivil, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Mendivil, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Rios, due to continuing disruptions taking place outside the City Council Chamber, that we adjourn the meeting to tomorrow morning to allow time for things to decompress. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Police Chief Manuel Rodriguez stated that an arrest had been made by police resulting in a sit-in by demonstrators in the lobby making it difficult to get people who have filled out speaker slips into the City Council Chamber to speak on items of business. STAFF REPORTS WERE TAKEN UP NEXT 6 66 of 473 Book 100 / Page 136 07-17-2018 C. REPORTS STAFF REPORTS City Engineer/Public Works Director Steve Manganiello provided an update on the status of the operation and repair of the air conditioners in the Library and Senior Center. Assistant City Manager Brad Raulston reported that the Port District approved a $900,000 matching grant to the City from the Port District. Police Chief Rodriguez updated the City Council that three arrests have been made by the Police Department and he recommended that it would be best to continue the City Council meeting to another time. Vice Mayor Mendivil asked if people are able to come into the Council Chamber. Chief Rodriguez said the entrance has been partially cleared but people entering the Council Chamber tend to excite those who cannot enter. Member Rios asked if continuing with the meeting would put people in danger. Chief Rodriguez said not necessarily danger, but it would create some disruption and the arrests that have been made create their own set of issues. Vice Mayor Mendivil asked the Chief if he was saying if continuing the meeting is going to exacerbate the situation and perhaps result in more arrests being made. Chief Rodriguez said that would be correct. Vice Mayor Mendivil asked how it would help the situation if the meeting stopped. Chief Rodriguez said the people outside would no longer have a reason get upset because people would no longer be entering the Council Chamber to address the Council. Vice Mayor Mendivil said he would like to take a five minute recess and bathroom break to talk about it. Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Rios, to adjourn the meeting at the request of the Police Chief for the safety of members of community, staff and police officers. Chief Rodriguez updated the City Council that due to the escalating situation outside the City Council Chamber and the large crowd size, the Police Department has called for mutual aid from the Sheriff and other jurisdictions. Vice Mayor Mendivil asked the Police Chief if continuing the meeting would put people in danger. 7 67 of 473 Book 100 / Page 137 07-17-2018 STAFF REPORTS (cont.) Chief Rodriguez responded that, based on the situation, and the fact that mutual aid has been requested, there was a possibility that people could be injured. Vice Mayor Mendivil said that he could now support the motion. Vice Mayor Mendivil said he would like to call a five minute recess to talk about the situation. The motion was clarified by the maker to be, to adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, July 18th at 10:00 am. Member Cano offered a substitute motion to adjourn the meeting to July 18th at 4:00 pm. There was no second. Member Cano said the people should be allowed to speak, and he still thinks the meeting should continue and move forward. VICE MAYOR MENDIVIL CALLED A FIVE MINUTE RECESS. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 8:32 PM. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Council / Board members absent: Morrison. At the request of Member Cano, the maker and second agreed to amend the original motion to include taking action on the Successor Agency Agenda prior to adjourning to 10:00 am on July 18th. Acting City Attorney Nicole Pedone ruled the amended motion unnecessary since the Successor Agency Agenda will be addressed after the City Council Meeting. The original motion on the floor was clarified to be, to adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, July 18th at 10:00 am. Member Cano made a substitute motion, seconded by Mendivil, to adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, July 18th at 4:00 pm. City Clerk Dalla advised that the substitute motion violates the rules of procedure and would be out of order. The original motion, to adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, July 18th at 10:00 am, failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Motion by Cano, seconded by Mendivil, to adjourn the meeting to July 18th at 4:00 p.m. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil. Nays: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. 8 68 of 473 Book 100 / Page 138 07-17-2018 STAFF REPORTS (cont.) Motion by Rios, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to agendize the matter of Earl McNeil. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Vice Mayor Mendivil asked the City Attorney how many members would need to be present at an Adjourned Meeting to constitute a quorum. Acting City Attorney Pedone responded that three members would constitute a quorum and a Resolution would require three affirmative votes. Motion by Mendivil, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to adjourn the meeting to July 18th at 2:00 p.m. and continue with the remainder of the agenda. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Rios. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. City Clerk The foregoing minutes were approved at the Regular Meeting of January 22, 2019. Mayor 9 69 of 473 Book 100 / Page 139 07-18-2018 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY July 18, 2018 The Adjourned Regular Meeting (continuation of the July 17111 meeting) of the City Council and Community Development Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City was called to order at 2:05 p.m. by Vice Mayor / Chairman Albert Mendivil. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis (2:14 pm). Council / Board members absent: Morrison. Administrative Officials present: Dalla, Deese, Duong, Parra, Pedone, Raulston, Reeder, Roberts, Rodriguez, Vergara. Others present: City Treasurer Mitch Beauchamp. NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS (cont.) PROPERTY TAX RATE BONDED INDEBTEDNESS ADMIN (205-02-02) 19. Resolution No. 2018-132. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REDUCING THE PROPERTY TAX RATE FOR THE LIBRARY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019 FROM 0.79 CENT PER $100 OF ASSESSED VALUATION TO 0.73 CENT. (Finance) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution, reducing the property tax rate for the Library General Obligation Bonds for Fiscal Year 2019 from 0.79 cent per $100 of assessed valuation to 0.73 cent. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Rios, seconded by Cano, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison, Sotelo-Solis. Abstain: None. ELECTION JUNE 2018 ADMIN (505-7-5) 20. Resolution No. 2018-133. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY RECITING THE RESULTS OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 2018 DECLARING THE VOTE PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA ELECTION CODE 10262 AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW. (City Clerk) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Rios, seconded by Mendivil, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison, Sotelo-Solis. Abstain: None. 10 70 of 473 Book 100 / Page 140 07-18-2018 NEW BUSINESS SUBDIVISIONS / VARIANCES 2018 (415-1-14) 21. Notice of Decision - Planning Commission approval of a Zone Variance to allow for a reduced rear -yard setback of a proposed single-family residence located on the west side of "D" Avenue north of East 29th Street. (Applicant: Jeffrey Silva) (Case File 2017-17 Z) (Planning) RECOMMENDATION: File the Notice of Decision. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Cano, seconded by Rios, to accept and file the Notice of Decision. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison, Sotelo-Solis. Abstain: None. Member Sotelo-Solis arrived at 2:14 pm TEMPORARY USE PERMITS 2018 (203-1-34) 18. Temporary Use Permit - 2nd Annual Bayside Brew and Spirits Festival sponsored by the National City Chamber of Commerce at Pepper Park on September 29, 2018 with a request for waiver of fees. (Neighborhood Services) RECOMMENDATION: Approve the application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval with no waiver of fees or in accordance to City Council Policy 802. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Cano, to approve without the waiver of fees. Motion died for lack of a second. Motion by Rios, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to approve with waiver of fees not including processing fees. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Motion by Cano, seconded by Mendivil, to approve without the waiver of fees. Carried by unanimous vote. RENT CONTROL MEASURE 2018 (505-7-8) 22. Certificate of Sufficiency of Petition - Rent Control and Direct Further Action under Section 9215 of the Election Code. (City Clerk) RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff to prepare the following Resolutions for consideration at the Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 24th: a) Calling for and Giving Notice of a Special Election, b) Ordering the Submission of a Measure, c) Requesting Consolidation with the Statewide General Election and d) Authorizing the filing of an Impartial Analysis by the City Attorney and Written Arguments. 11 71 of 473 Book 100 / Page 141 07-18-2018 NEW BUSINESS (cont.) RENT CONTROL MEASURE 2018 (505-7-8) 22. Certificate of Sufficiency of Petition (continued) TESTIMONY: The following speakers spoke in support of moving the measure to the ballot: Ignacio Hernandez Valverde, Irvin Martinez, Molly Kirkland, Tracy Morgan Hollingsworth, Alicia Sanchez, Bradley Bang, Paola Martinez-Montes, Tom Lemon, Carolina Martinez and Dr. Peter (un-known last name). ACTION: Motion made by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Rios, to move forward to adopt the Rent Control Ordinance without alteration. It was clarified by the City Attorney that the proper motion would be to direct staff to bring back resolution language to adopt the Ordinance for consideration at the next meeting. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Motion by Rios, seconded by Mendivil, to direct staff to prepare the following Resolutions for consideration at the Adjourned Regular Meeting of July 24th to place the measure on the ballot: a) Calling for and Giving Notice of a Special Election, b) Ordering the Submission of a Measure, c) Requesting Consolidation with the Statewide General Election and d) Authorizing the filing of an Impartial Analysis by the City Attorney and Written Arguments. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. C. REPORTS STAFF REPORTS There were no staff reports. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Member Sotelo-Solis thanked the public and staff for being present at the meetings and read the following prepared joint statement on behalf of herself and Member Rios regarding the Earl McNeil case. "On behalf of Councilmember Rios and I, we are writing to highlight the importance of transparency and the need for a thorough investigation in the Earl McNeil case, the City of National City, and the City Police Department. Our sincere thoughts and prayers are with the McNeil family. There are questions, and due to the ongoing investigation nature as to what occurred and what the outcome will be, we ask for questions to be answered in a timely and thorough manner. As Councilmembers and supporters of law enforcement, and believers in a thorough process, we know firsthand, and have funded, the improvements and purposeful efforts our National City Police Department has done to work side by side with our community to improve community relations. We all stand together for transparency and accountability so that the family and community can find solace. Thank you." 12 72 of 473 Book 100 / Page 142 07-18-2018 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL (cont.) Motion by Rios, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to agendize the discussion on Mr. Earl McNeil. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo- Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Motion by Rios, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to agendize a discussion for a proclamation for Snookie Rico. Member Mendivil advised that the proper protocol for proclamations is to refer them to the Mayor's office and there was no need to vote on the item. Vice Mayor Mendivil spoke on rent control stating that it is a difficult topic and expressed his concerns for the Earl McNeil family and friends and all who are upset. Member Sotelo-Solis shared that, as part of next week's meeting, there will be resolution language considered regarding the separation of families' by the Federal Government. She urged everyone to read up on the resolution language that she will be proposing. PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individuals expressed their displeasure with the City and the need for justice and transparency in the Earl McNeil case: William Johnson, Michael Rodriguez, Bri, Brittany McCline, Armando Abundis, Mary Duty, Amie Zamudio, Jay Evans, Catherine Barnes, Loxie Gant, Blair Overstreet, Earl McNeil II (Tasha Williamson), Bishop Bower, Mark Lane, Earl McNeil 3rd O. Earl McNeil, and Brooke. A RECESS WAS CALLED AT 3:25 PM. THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 3:34 PM. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Council / Board members absent: Morrison. PUBLIC COMMENTS (cont.) Coyote Moon, National City, spoke on the current vacancies on the Community and Police Relations Commission (CPRC), and urged the Council to fill the vacancies and to publish the minutes in a timely manner. She suggested that the CPRC be given subpoena powers. James Elia, El Cajon, expressed his displeasure with the City Council and their decision making regarding rent control and Earl McNeil. 13 73 of 473 Book 100 / Page 143 07-18-2018 ADJOURNMENT Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Cano, to adjourn the meeting to the next Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City - Tuesday — July 24, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers - National City, California. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: Morrison. Abstain: None. Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City - Tuesday — September 4, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers - National City, California. The meeting closed at 3:47 p.m. City Clerk The foregoing minutes were approved at the Regular Meeting of January 22, 2019. Mayor CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE RECESS August 7, 2018 - City Council Meeting - Dispensed With August 21, 2018 - City Council Meeting - Dispensed With 14 74 of 473 Book 100 / Page 144 07-24-2018 DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION — HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY July 24, 2018 The Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission — Housing Authority of the City of National City was called to order at 6:09 p.m. by Mayor / Chairman Ron Morrison. ROLL CALL Council / Board members present: Cano, Mendivil, Morrison, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Administrative Officials present: Dalla, Deese, Denham, Duong, Manganiello, Morris -Jones, Mosley, Parra, Raulston, Roberts, Rodriguez, Vergara, Williams, Ybarra. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY MAYOR RON MORRISON PUBLIC COMMENTS Martin Ruiz, National City, spoke about his experience as an intern working in the Mayor's office. Matt Dunn, San Diego, spoke on Electro Politics, race, policing, and how it can affect the upcoming election. The following speakers spoke on justice and Earl McNeil: Julie Corrales, Marco, Jules Jay, Earl McNeil III, Norma Velasquez, Earl McNeil IV, Earl McNeil II (Tasha Williamson), Brooke Schuller, Diamond Wallace, Liz Shopes, Anita Turner, Yusef McNeil, Mark Lane, Therese Hymer, Susannah Bankead, Shane Parmely, Art Fusco, Cat Mendonca, Gretel Rordriguez, Rashida Hamecel, Pat Aceves, Armando Abundis, Muhamed Abduan, Leah Blake, and Ira Carter -Campbell. PROCLAMATIONS PROCLAMATION ADMIN (102-2-1) 1. Alzheimer's and Brain Awareness Month 2. NaFFAA San Diego/ Imperial Region Filipino -American Friendship Day ACTION: Proclamations were continued to a future meeting. 15 75 of 473 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR Book 100 / Page 145 07-24-2018 ADOPTION OF CONSENT CALENDAR. Item No. 3 (NCMC), Item No. 4 through 14 (Resolution Nos. 2018-134 through 2018-144), and Item No. 15 (Temporary Use Permit). Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Cano, to approve the Consent Calendar. Carried by unanimous vote. MUNICIPAL CODE 2018 (506-2-33) 3. MOTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE WAIVING OF THE READING OF THE TEXT OF THE ORDINANCES CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING AND PROVIDING THAT SUCH ORDINANCES SHALL BE INTRODUCED AND/OR ADOPTED AFTER A READING OF THE TITLE ONLY. (City Clerk) ACTION: Approved. See above. LABOR RELATIONS POA MOU 2016-2019 (605-3-12) 4. Resolution No. 2018-134. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY 1) AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (FBI) TO PARTICIPATE IN OPERATIONS WITH THE HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND CHILD EXPLOITATION TASK FORCE (HTCETF), 2) AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF FUNDS, AND 3) AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATION AND CORRESPONDING REVENUE BUDGET FOR OVERTIME UP TO THE AMOUNT OF $18,042 PER FISCAL YEAR. THE HTCETF CONDUCTS CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND TARGET CRIMINALS WHO ENGAGE IN SEX TRAFFICKING, FORCED LABOR TRAFFICKING, DOMESTIC SERVITUDE AND TO RESCUE CHILD VICTIMS; TO REDUCE THE VULNERABILITY OF CHILDREN TO SEXUAL EXPLOITATION AND ABUSE. (Police) ACTION: Adopted. See above. CONTRACT (C2015-56) GRANT / OTS DUI / TRAFFIC EDUCATION (206-4-4) 5. Resolution No. 2018-135. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY; 1) AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT AWARD IN THE AMOUNT OF $100,000 FROM THE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY (OTS) FOR THE SELECTIVE TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM (STEP) GRANT 2019 TO CONDUCT DUI AND TRAFFIC RELATED ENFORCEMENT OPERATIONS; 2) AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT OF THE AWARD OF THE GRANT FUNDS; AND 3) AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FUND APPROPRIATIONS AND CORRESPONDING REVENUE BUDGET. (Police) ACTION: Adopted. See above. 16 76 of 473 Book 100 / Page 146 07-24-2018 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) CONTRACT (C2018-48) 6. Resolution No. 2018-136. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WAIVING THE FORMAL BID PROCESS PURSUANT TO NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.60.220, SUBSECTION (B), SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT WITH THERMO SCIENTIFIC PORTABLE ANALYTICAL INSTRUMENTS, INC., FOR THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $61,896.15 FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENTS PURCHASE OF TWO (2) TRUNARC CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS, WITH A 5-YEAR WARRANTY ON EACH MACHINE. (Police) ACTION: Adopted. See above. CONTRACT (C2013-27) 7. Resolution No. 2018-137. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO FIRE AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL DISPATCH SERVICES AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY TO EXTEND THE TERM OF THE AGREEMENT FOR ONE ADDITIONAL YEAR, RETROACTIVE TO JULY 1, 2018 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2019. (Fire) ACTION: Adopted. See above. FIRE DEPT ADMIN (305-1-1) 8. Resolution No. 2018-138. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WAIVING THE FORMAL BID PROCESS PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.60.260 FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PIERCE ARROW XT PUMPER WITH EQUIPMENT FOR THE NATIONAL CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO PIGGYBACK THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES SUPPLY CONTRACT 59710 — AMENDMENT 1 WITH PIERCE MANUFACTURING, INC., FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $707,701.37 USING THE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND. (Fire) ACTION: Adopted. See above. FIRE DEPTADMIN (305-1-1) 9. Resolution No. 2018-139. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WAIVING THE FORMAL BID PROCESS PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.60.260 FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PIERCE ARROW XT PUMPER WITH EQUIPMENT FOR THE NATIONAL CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO PIGGYBACK THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES SUPPLY COTRACT 59710 — AMENDMENT 1 WITH PIERCE MANUFACTURING, 17 77 of 473 Book 100 / Page 147 07-24-2018 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) FIRE DEPT ADMIN (305-1-1) 9. Resolution No. 2018-139 (continued). INC., FOR A NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $707,701.37 USING THE VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND. (Fire) ACTION: Adopted. See above. ENGINEERING / PUBLIC WORKS DEPT - GRANTS / REPORTS ADMIN (1104-1-1) 10. Resolution No. 2018-140. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, WAIVING THE FORMAL BID PROCESS CONSISTENT WITH NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.60.260 REGARDING COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY (BUYER) TO PIGGYBACK THE NATIONAL JOINT POWERS ALLIANCE CONTRACT #120716-NAF TO AWARD THE PURCHASE AND BUILD -OUT OF TWO (2) 2019 FORD TRANSIT CONNECT VANS (S7E) XL LWB TO NATIONAL AUTO FLEET GROUP IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $58,506.68 FOR THE ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES MAINTENANCE DIVISION. (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. PARKING & TRAFFIC CONTROL ADMIN 2018 (801-2-40) 11. Resolution No. 2018-141. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION OF 25 FEET OF ADDITIONAL RED CURB "NO PARKING" ON THE WEST SIDE OF "L" AVENUE, NORTH OF E. PLAZA BOULEVARD (TSC NO. 2018-12). (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. 12. Resolution No. 2018-142. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION OF STOP CONTROL AT VARIOUS INTERSECTIONS WITHIN THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOUNDED BY E. 1ST STREET TO THE NORTH, E. 4TH STREET TO THE SOUTH, HIGHLAND AVENUE TO THE EAST AND "D" AVENUE TO THE WEST (TSC No. 2018-13). (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. 18 78 of 473 Book 100 / Page 148 07-24-2018 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) PARKING & TRAFFIC CONTROL ADMIN 2018 (801-2-40) 13. Resolution No. 2018-143. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE REMOVAL OF ONE, 15-MINUTE TIME RESTRICTED PARKING SPACE IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 1039 "D" AVENUE (TSC No. 2018-14). (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. 14. Resolution No. 2018-144 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE REMOVAL OF TWO, 30- MINUTE TIME RESTRICTED PARKING SPACES IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 1900 WILSON AVENUE (TSC No. 2018-15). (Engineering/Public Works) ACTION: Adopted. See above. TEMPORARY USE PERMITS 2018 (203-1-34) 15. Temporary Use Permit — Pumpkin Station hosted by Pinery Christmas Trees, Inc. at Westfield Plaza Bonita Mall from September 28, 2018 thru October 31, 2018 with no waiver of fees. (Neighborhood Services) ACTION: Approved. See above. PUBLIC HEARINGS: ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS MUNICIPAL CODE 2018 (506-2-33) 16. Ordinance No. 2018-2449. PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 13, SECTION 13.22.060, SUBSECTION "A" PERTAINING TO PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE BUILDING PERMITS. (Engineering/Public Works) RECOMMENDATION: Provide second reading and adopt Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending National City Municipal Code Title 13, Section 13.22.060, Subsection "A". TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Cano to close the Public Hearing. Carried by unanimous vote. Motion by Cano, seconded by Mendivil, to adopt the Ordinance. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Morrison. Nays: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Absent: None. Abstain: None. A RECESS WAS CALLED AT 7:19 PM THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:55 PM. ALL MEMBERS WERE PRESENT. 19 79 of 473 Book 100 / Page 149 07-24-2018 ITEM NO. 17 WAS RE -INTRODUCED. MEMBER MENDIVIL RECUSED HIMSELF AND LEFT THE CHAMBER DURING CONSIDERATION OF ITEM NOS. 17 THROUGH 20 BECAUSE HE IS AN OWNER OF RENTAL PROPERTY. NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS ELECTION NOV 2018 ADMIN (505-7-9) 17. Resolution No. 2018-145. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2018, FOR THE PURPOSE OF SUBMISSION OF A BALLOT MEASURE TO THE VOTERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES. (City Clerk) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Rios, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Morrison, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: Mendivil. ELECTION NOV 2018 ADMIN (505-7-9) 18. Resolution No. 2018-146. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ORDERING THE SUBMISSION OF A MEASURE TO THE QUALIFIED VOTERS OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 6, 2018, RELATING TO APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM OF RESIDENTIAL RENT CONTROL, INCLUDING CREATION OF AN INDEPENDENT RENT BOARD, AND INCLUDING JUST CAUSE FOR EVICTION PROTECTIONS AND RENT STABILIZATION PROVISIONS. (City Clerk) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. TESTIMONY: A statement in support of rent control, by Alicia Sanchez, National City, was read into the record by Translator Laura Casas. Rafael Bautista, Dr. Peter Brownell, Adriana Huerta, Irvine Martinez, and Paola Martinez Montes submitted speaker slips in support of rent control but were not present to speak. ACTION: Mayor Morrison stated for the record that the proposed action is legally required and the City Council has no discretion in the matter. Motion by Rios, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Morrison, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: Mendivil. 20 80 of 473 Book 100 / Page 150 07-24-2018 NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS (cont.) ELECTION NOV 2018 ADMIN (505-7-9) 19. Resolution No. 2018-147. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 6, 2018 WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE. (City Clerk) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Rios, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil, Morrison. Nays: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Absent: None. Abstain: None. RENT CONTROL MEASURE 2018 (505-7-8) 20. Resolution No. 2018-148. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS AND WRITTEN ARGUMENTS RELATING TO A MEASURE TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A PROGRAM OF RESIDENTIAL RENT CONTROL, INCLUDING CREATION OF AN INDEPENDENT RENT BOARD, AND INCLUDING JUST CAUSE FOR EVICTION PROTECTIONS AND RENT STABILIZATION PROVISIONS. (City Clerk) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. TESTIMONY A statement in support of rent control, by Irma Reyes, National City, was read into the record by Translator Laura Casas. Carmen Perez Dion and Rick Bates submitted speaker slips in support of rent control, but were not present to speak. ACTION: Motion by Rios, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Morrison, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: Mendivil. MEMBER MENDIVIL RETURNED TO THE CHAMBER. NEW BUSINESS HOUSING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPT ADMIN (1104-1-9) 21. Update on the status of finalizing Maintenance and Operating Agreements with the National City Historical Society, National City Living History Farm Preserve and the San Diego Electric Railway Association for consideration by the City Council. (Housing & Economic Development) ACTION: No action was taken. 21 81 of 473 Book 100 / Page 151 07-24-2018 NEW BUSINESS (cont.) MEMBER CANO STATED THAT HE WOULD BE RECUSING HIMSELF FROM THE NEXT ITEM SINCE IT RELATES TO SOME ITEMS THAT INVOLVE HIM. MEMBER CANO LEFT THE CHAMBER. CITY ATTORNEY REPORTS (509-1-3) 22. Results of investigations by Lozano Smith, Attorneys at Law into the allegations against Councilmember Cano and the allegation against Councilmember Rios. (City Attorney) PRESENTATION: The Investigative report titled "Report of Special Counsel" was distributed to the Mayor, City Council, Staff, and the public. Attorney William Curley reviewed the methodology, conclusion, and recommendations of the report. TESTIMONY: Attorney Cory Briggs, representing Member Mona Rios, requested a copy of an e-mail sent to Attorney Curley from Member Cano and addressed various aspects of the report. Attorney Briggs, representing San Diegans for Open Government, requested any public records addressing an expense item mentioned in the report. Attorney Briggs offered suggestions on how to avoid future problems with code violations. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council review the report thoroughly and that it come back on the September 4th City Council agenda for direction on how to proceed and to provide direction on recommendations regarding a formal public apology. ACTION: The consensus was to place the report on the September 4th Agenda. There was no vote. Note: A copy of the Special Counsel Report is attached as Exhibit "A". MEMBER CANO RETURNED TO THE CHAMBER. COUNCIL POLICY ADMIN (102-13-1) 23. City Council discussion and direction on draft City Council Policy #119 - Code of Ethics and Conduct for Elected Officials, Council Appointed Officials, and Members of City Boards, Commissions and Committees. (City Manager) ACTION: Motion by Mendivil, seconded by Cano, to bring back the draft policy in resolution form on September 4th and include a Glossary of Terms. Carried by unanimous vote. 22 82 of 473 Book 100 / Page 152 07-24-2018 B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION - HOUSING AUTHORITY NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS - HOUSING AUTHORITY CONTRACT (C2013-52) HOUSING AUTHORITY 2018 (404-1-7) 24. Resolution No. 2018-67. RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION -HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WITH WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUBORDINATING THE PROJECT DEED OF TRUST THAT SECURES THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS (TENANT RESTRICTIONS) ON SUMMERCREST APARTMENTS LOCATED AT 2721 PLAZA BOULEVARD IN NATIONAL CITY. (Housing & Economic Development) RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution to execute the Subordination Agreement. TESTIMONY: None. ACTION: Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Mendivil, to adopt the Resolution. Carried by unanimous vote. C. REPORTS STAFF REPORTS Director of Finance Mark Roberts announced the resignation of Financial Services Officer and current Acting Director of Finance Javier Carcamo who accepted a lateral position for the City of Poway. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL CITY COUNCIL ADMIN (102-16-1) 25. Discussion of language for a resolution in opposition to the Trump Administration's "Zero Tolerance" Policy and Family Separation of Immigrants. (Councilmember Sotelo-Solis) ACTION: Motion by Cano, seconded by Mendivil, to not move forward with a Resolution. Substitute motion made by Rios, seconded by Sotelo-Solis, to move forward with a Resolution with recommended revisions. Motion failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: Cano, Mendivil. Absent: None. Abstain: Morrison. Original motion to not move forward failed by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Cano, Mendivil. Nays: Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Absent: None. Abstain: Morrison. 23 83 of 473 Book 100 / Page 153 07-24-2018 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL (cont.) Member Mendivil spoke of his disappointment in regards to the City Council not coming together as a unit based on what transpired during the last City Council meeting on the Earl McNeil matter. Member Sotelo-Solis responded to Member Mendivil's comments saying that the issue does affect the community and there has to be transparency. She defended herself for the times in the past when she has asked questions and said she will stay true to who she is. Member Sotelo-Solis then read the following statement into the record: "On behalf of Councilmember Rios and I, we are writing to highlight the importance of transparency and the need for a thorough investigation in the Earl McNeil case, the City of National City, and the City Police Department. Our sincere thoughts and prayers are with the McNeil family. There are questions, and due to the ongoing investigation nature as to what occurred and what the outcome will be, we ask for questions to be answered in a timely and thorough manner. As Councilmembers and supporters of law enforcement, and believers in a thorough process, we know firsthand, and have funded, the improvements and purposeful efforts our National City Police Department has done to work side by side with our community to improve community relations. We all stand together for transparency and accountability so that the family and community can find solace. Thank you." Member Rios said she hopes that Member Mendivil listened to the statement that was read into the record. She spoke briefly on her history as a Councilmember and how she will always strive to govern the same and will continue to ask the questions and make sure that there is a balance. At the last meeting, she was concerned about things getting out of hand and felt a need to reevaluate the response. Member Cano criticized the motives and conduct of two of his Council colleagues; he said they made the situation worse by the motion they made; that they created a hostile work environment and that he was disappointed in them. Mayor Morrison reviewed the protest history of some of the people who have been disrupting Council meetings. He took issue with their conduct and motives and said he was not going to be an ally of people who want to tear down the City and questioned what would be accomplished by putting the item on the agenda. City Attorney Morris -Jones announced that the Special Meeting on July 25th has been cancelled. CLOSED SESSION REPORT There was no Closed Session report. 24 84 of 473 Book 100 / Page 154 07-24-2018 ADJOURNMENT Motion by Sotelo-Solis, seconded by Cano, to adjourn the meeting to the next Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City - Tuesday - September 4, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers - National City, California. Carried by unanimous vote. Regular Meeting of the City Council and Community Development Commission - Housing Authority of the City of National City - Tuesday — September 4, 2018 - 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers - National City, California. The meeting closed at 12:38 a.m. City Clerk The foregoing minutes were approved at the Regular Meeting of January 22, 2019. Mayor CITY COUNCIL LEGISLATIVE RECESS August 7, 2018 - City Council Meeting - Dispensed With August 21, 2018 - City Council Meeting - Dispensed With 25 85 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 86 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a First Amendment to the Agreement with Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego to provide support services for National City's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program, increasing the not -to -exceed amount of the Agreement by $300,000, for a total Agreement amount of $600,000, and extending the term of the Agreement to February 15, 2022; and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Amendment to Agreement. (Engineering/Public Works) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 86 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a First Amendment to the Agreement with Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego to provide support services for National City's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program, increasing the not -to -exceed amount of the Agreement by $300,000, for a total Agreement amount of $600,000, and extending the term of the Agreement to February 15, 2022; and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Amendment to Agreement. PREPARED BY: Stephen Manganiello PHONE: 619-336-4382 EXPLANATION: See attached. DEPARTMENT: Enginering/blic •rks APPROVED BY: "1/6(44.6/ t FINANCIAL STATEMENT: APPROVED: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: Funds appropriated in CIP account # 001-409-500-598-6573 (Traffic Safety/Transportation Improvements) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: N/A ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution approving a First Amendment to the Agreement with Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego to provide support services for National City's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Explanation 2. First Amendment to Agreement 3. Resolution 8/Ot4/31 Explanation: On February 16, 2016, per City Council Resolution No. 2016-16, the City of National City entered into an Agreement with Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego to provide to provide support services for National City's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program, including but not limited to, health and safety education; incentive -based walk/bike to school activities; presentations and workshops at parent -teacher meetings and public events; coordination with National City Police Department for recruitment and training of volunteer safety patrols; focus groups, user surveys, evaluation and reporting to determine SRTS Program effectiveness; and public safety campaigns. The Agreement is for a not -to -exceed amount of $300,000 and a term of three years, with the option to extend for one additional three-year period. Based on their performance and quality of work, staff recommends amending the Agreement with Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego to allow for continued support services for National City's SRTS Program. The First Amendment to Agreement would increase the not -to -exceed amount by $300,000, for a total Agreement amount of $600,000, and extend the term of the Agreement to February 15, 2022. Funding is available through General Fund CIP account #001-409-500-598-6573 (Traffic Safety / Transportation Improvements). 88 of 473 FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL - SAN DIEGO This First Amendment to the Agreement is entered into this 22nd day of January, 2019 by and between the City of National City, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and Rady Children's Hospital — San Diego, a California Non -Profit Public Benefit Corporation (the "CONSULTANT"). RECITALS WHEREAS, The CITY and the CONSULTANT entered into an Agreement on February 16, 2016, (the "Agreement") through the adoption of City Council Resolution No. 2016-16, wherein the CONSULTANT agreed to provide support services for National City's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program, including but not limited to, health and safety education; incentive -based walk/bike to school activities; presentations and workshops at parent -teacher meetings and public events; coordination with National City Police Department —for —recruitment and training of volunteer safety patrols; focus groups, user surveys, evaluation and reporting to determine SRTS Program effectiveness; and public safety campaigns; and WHEREAS, the Agreement, had a not -to -exceed amount of $300,000 and a term of three years, with the option to extend for one additional three-year period; and WHEREAS, based on the CONSULTANT'S performance and quality of work, the CITY desires to have the CONSULTANT continue providing support services for National City's SRTS Program, and the CONSULTANT is willing to perform such services; therefore, the parties desire to increase the not -to -exceed amount by $300,000, for a total Agreement amount of $600,000, and extend the term of the Agreement to February 15, 2022, AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to amend the Agreement entered into on February 16, 2016, as follows: 1. Increase the not -to -exceed amount by $300,000, for a total Agreement amount of $600,000. 2. Extend the term of the Agreement to February 15, 2022. 3. The parties further agree that with the foregoing exception, each and every term and provision, of the Agreement dated February 16, 2016, shall remain in full force and effect. 89 of 473 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment to Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL — SAN DIEGO i I By: By: L ' L,sia-) Alejandra Sotelo-Solis, Mayor Nicholas Holmes, MD Chief Operating Officer By: /-/ \ Margar a E. Norton `" --- Secr ary / Chief Administrative Officer APPROVED AS TO FORM: Angil P. Morris -Jones City Attorney By: Roberto M. Contreras Deputy City Attorney 90 of 473 I A.r„�r-. COICI" Iirk-CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MwooNYYY) 12/6/2018 — THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: if the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Children's Hospital Insurance LTD 6th FI.,Cumberland House, 1 Victoria St. Hamilton HM 11, Bermuda CONTACT Lisa Stockinger pHONn Fkn, 925-943-3264 I -FAX 1:(925) 932-4260 E-MAREss.LStockinger@fames—gable.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC# NSURERA:Children's Hospital Insurance Ltd. N/A INSURED Rady Children's Hospital and Health Center, et al 3020 Children's Way, MC 5052 San Diego, CA 92123 INSURERS: INSURER C : INSURER D: INSURERS: INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUJREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAYHAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INsI LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE AUUL INSD sut1R WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF (MM/DDIYYYY) POLICY EXP (MMIDDIYYYY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY CHL1018^19 7/1/1$ 7/1/19 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1 LOOO 000 X I CLAIMS -MADE ID OCCUR PREMISES (Ea ocAMAGE TO cD rr Bnce) urrence) $ 1,000 r 000 dCOMMERCIAL MEDEXP(Anyonepersan) $ incl Retro-Date 10/1/94 1 170007000- $ 6,000,000 I I -PHRSONALTADVINJURY GEN'L AGGREGATE GE OOLICY OTHER: LIMIT APPLIES PERCOT- Ei PER: LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 1, 000, 000 $ AUTOMOBILE — LIABILITY ANYAUTO OWNED AUTOS ONLY HIRED AUTOS ONLY — — _ SCHEDULED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Pet accident) , $ A UMBRELiA LIAR EXCESS LIAB X OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE _ CHL2018.19 7/1/18 7/1/19 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 AGGREGATE $ 1,000 , 000 or DED LI RETENTION$ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION ANDEMPLOYERS'LIABILITY Y! ANY PROPRIETO RIPARTNERlEXECUTIVE OFFICER(MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) Ifyes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSbehv N!A rPERTUTE ER I OTH- STA E,L, EACH ACCIDENbT $ EL, DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ R.LwDLSEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ . DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS ILOCATIONS 1 VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space Is required) Evidence of general liability as pertains to written agreement with City of National City for implementation of National City's Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Program. City of National City and its officers, agents and employees are included as Additional Insureds with respect to this agreement. Waiver of Subrogation also applies. ERTIFICATE HO LDER City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-4301 Attn: Director of Public Works/ City Engineer CANCELLA 10 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTFIORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Anne tru+emedOld,,., LTD Bermuda ACORD 25 (2016/03) O 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 91 of 473 ACORipr THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM!DDJYYYY) 12/6/2018 IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder Is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(Ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsoment(s). PRODUCER JAMES + GABLE INSURANCE BROKERS 1660 Olympic Blvd #325 Walnut Creek, CA 94596 INSURED Rady Children's Hospital and Health Center, et al 3020 Children's Way San Diego, CA 92123 CONTACTLisa NAME: PHONE (Air: No FA' E-MAIL ADDRESS' Stockinger 925)943-3264 1 A/C,No)'{925) 932_4260 INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE Travelers Hzoparty Casualty Company o7. M�=Soa _INSURER A• INSURER B: NAIC 36161 INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURE;: INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE SEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED.. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN 15 SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INS LTR A A TYPE OF INSURANCE COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY ( CLAIMS -MADE El OCCUR G'—"'EEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: RPOLICY A-...J JECT LOC OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY X X ANYAUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY — AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY x AUTOS ONLY UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE DEO u RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOWPARTNER(EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) ityas, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below AUUL 1NSD N(A W I) POLICY N UMBER 810-8465L841-TIL TC2JUB4258B99418 POLICY EFF POLICY EXP JMM(ODIYYYY) MM(DDNYYYY] 7/1/2018 7/1/2018 7/1/2019 7/1/2019 LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RtN 1 ED PREMISES fEa occurrence) MED EXP (Anyone person) PERSONAL & ADV INJURY GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS -COMP(OPAGG -COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE {Por accfdonl) EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 $ $ $ X' STEATUTE I I ERH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,00.0,00.0. E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. DISEASE- POLICY LIMIT $ 1,0V.1].A1)0t $ 1,001004, DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1LOCATIONS /VEHICLES (ACORD 101, AddifonalRemarks Schedule, may beattached if more space is required) Re: National City's Safe Route to School (SRTS) Program. The City of National City, its elected officials, officers, agents and employees are included as Additional Insureds on the auto policy per form #CAT353. Waiver of subrogation in favor of the City is included per form #WC990376. E .OLDEA ELLATIt►N City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950-4301 Attn: Director of Public Works/ City Engineer SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE •;�.. THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED ,IN‘: .+ ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLIGY PROVISIONS. ' .• AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 01988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 92 of 473 ENDORSEMENT #2 This endorsement effective July 1, 2018 forms part of Policy No.: CHL1018-19 Issued to: RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER, ET AL By: CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INSURANCE LIMITED BLANKET ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT Section II. WHO IS AN INSURED of the HEALTHCARE GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART is amended by adding the following: R. Any person, organization, trustee or estate to whom you are obligated by written contract to provide insurance such as is afforded by this policy, but only with respect to: 1. liability arising out of operations conducted by you or on your behalf; or 2. facilities owned or used by you; And only to the extent that coverage is required by the written contract. Coverage afforded an additional insured pursuant to this endorsement shall in no event be broader than coverage afforded any other Insured under this policy. All other terms, conditions and exclusions of the policy remain unchanged. Signed By: Authorized Reps pntative Artex Risk Solutions (Bermuda) Ltd. As Managers HPL (5/07) 'N;j (Date) 93 of 473 ENDORSEMENT #3 This endorsement, effective July 1, 2018 forms a part of Policy No.: CHL1018-19 Issued to: RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CENTER, ET AL By: CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INSURANCE LIMITED ENDORSEMENT r BLANKET WAIVER OF SUBROGATION This endorsement modifies such insurance as is afforded by the Healthcare General Liability Coverage Part. Where required by written contract executed by you prior to a loss, we waive any right of recovery we may have against any person or organization, because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of the Named Insured's operations. All other terms and conditions of this policy remain unchanged. Signed By: Authorized l eprds4ntative HPL (5/07) Artex Risk Solutions (Bermuda) Ltd. As Managers 94 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 95 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting and approving the recordation of a grant deed from Silvergate Plaza Investors, LLC for a Street Easement for a portion of Plaza Boulevard located at 1640 E. Plaza Boulevard (APN 557-410-20). (Engineering/Public Works) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 95 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting and approving the recordation of a grant deed from Silvergate Plaza Investors, LLC for a Street Easement for a portion of Plaza Boulevard located at 1640 E. Plaza Boulevard (APN 557-410-20). PREPARED BY: Charles Nissley PHONE: 336-4396 EXPLANATION: Silvergate Plaza Investors, LLC is the owner of the property located at 1640 E. Plaza Boulevard in National City (APN 557-410-20). They are currently constructing a 77 unit apartment complex on site. In order to accommodate public improvements associated with the Plaza Boulevard Widening Project, Silvergate Plaza Investors, LLC have executed a Street Easement grant deed and are requesting that the City accept and record the grant deed. DEPARTMENT: Engineering & Public Works APPROVED BY: FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. N/A ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: N/A ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: APPROVED: APPROVED: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution accepting and approving the recordation of a grant deed from Silvergate Plaza Investors, LLC for a Street Easement for a portion of Plaza Boulevard located at 1640 E. Plaza Boulevard (APN 557-410-20). BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Grant Deed 2. Resolution 96 of 473 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY mut AFTER RECORDING MAIL TO: City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, Ca. 91950 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE NO FEES DUB — FOR BENEFIT OF PUBLIC AGENCY APN 557 410 20 00 No documentary tax due R & T 11922 (amended) STREET EASEMENT For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Silvergate Plaza Investors,'°LLC, (Grantor), hereby grants to City of National City, (Grantee), a permanent and exclusive easement ("Easement") for street purposes over, under and upon the land located in the County of San Diego, State of California, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "Jr attached hereto and made a part hereof. Said Easement includes the right of ingress and egress for purposes of constructing a public street and appurtenances, together with the right to construct, operate, maintain, repair and replace said street and appurtenances. All references herein to Grantor and Grantee shall refer to and be binding upon their respective personal representatives, successors and assigns, specifically including any successor -in -interest to Grantor in ownership of fee title to the Easement Land and Servient Tenement, IN WITNESS WEREOF, Grantor has executed this Grant of Easement as of this It day of t`� "+ttQi(4.„, 2018. GRANTOR: Silverga Date: ( G By: Print Name: Date: .A notarypulitte orolheroflicercompletingthiscertificateverifiesantytheIdentityof the Individual who signed the document to which this certificate Is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, ervafldityoflhal document. Stale o1Ca)rfomla Comity ol rjQv V1 ''* }ss. Cu tk.Gcm1s ' `y? befameme, . •. .i� w ' z `+ V ... ;. tuNetwyPubla, pgrsonalty ;pp it av% t tl who.prov d to nia onto Musts of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s,N whose gore auhactlbed to the Ain Instrument end acknowledged to me that 'yy executod Iho sane In Jt herfthetr authorised capacity(tes), and that by herdhefr algae ur* en the Instnrment the parsenlb}, or the entity upon behalf of wYitch the ppeerraan'aj acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY tindery re laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph Is true nnrlcorrect, WiTNi:SSmyhandandalficloiseal. By: laza vestars, LLC 1 Thof M . Crux.. Print Name: It,s: ,JAZMIN POND VELRZQUEZ GOMM; ff 247201 m NQtARY PUSIJO • CALIFORNIA a, otrdrtlasfon x teaA 2922 97 of 473 EXHYBI1 1 A' PERMANENT ACQUISITION APN 557-410-20 THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 13257, IN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 8, 1984 AS FILE NO. 84-170925 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A BRASS DISK STAMPED CP5 ACCORDING TO RECORD OF SURVEY MAP NO. 17515 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER ON AUGUST 30, 2002 WHICH BEARS SOUTH 17°35'27" EAST 285.74 FEET FROM A BRASS DISK STAMPED CP6 ACCORDING TO SAID RECORD OF SURVEY MAP; THENCE NORTH 86°49'39" EAST 327.87 FEET TO A POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; 1. THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 17°44'14" WEST 10.34 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL. 1, SAID POINT BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF PLAZA BOULEVARD•, 2. THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 SOUTH 74°45''11" EAST (SOUTH 75°43'04" EAST PER SAID PARCEL MAP) 29.18 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 540.00-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY; 3. THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 3°09'38" A DISTANCE OF 29.79 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 1; 4. THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 1 SOUTH 17°41'47" EAST 7.45 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT 612.20-FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, A RADIAL LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 9° 19'30" WEST; 5. THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 5°22`51" A DISTANCE OF 57.49 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. AREA W 0.010 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. UI E RCE 27648 98 of 473 r4cPG 1 Zas P,0'B, N 86'49'39" E CP5 LEGEND T.P,O.B. P.O.B. A PM PAR 2 REVISED BY: DRAWN 8Y: KA a-HEG<ED aY: MA APPROVED IN; 327.07 y;EXHIBIT "B" S 14"42'21" W(R) Sa, IkdoP i�1�411, �. '•' vgii PERM, ACQ. AND TCE PERMANENT, ACQUISITION AREA = 0.010 ACRES TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (TOE) AREA = 0.013 ACRES TRUE POINT O' BEGINNING POINT OF BEGINNING CONTROL POINT PER RCS 17515 10267 DRAINAGE EASEMENT -� PER PM 13257 27' DRIVEWAY EASEMENT REC. 1/14/85 AS FILE NO. 85-011421 O.R. DATE: DATE: 4-16-08 DATE: 5-22-08 DATE: PAR 1 557•-410--20 11.20' S 17'41'474 E 7,10` SEWER EASEMENT PER PM 13257 FOR NW l4 Or W 1/2 LOT 2 IN cUAFiTs R SEC, 129 0r H1-1O, DE LA NACJON MAP NO. les. TABULATE) CURD DATA CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH C1 3109'38- 540,00' 612.2r 29.79' 57,49'^ C2 5'22'51" C3 515'57" 622.20' 57,18' NA110NAL CITY PERMANENT ACQUISITION AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT APN 557' 410-20 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF NATIONAL CITY SCALE 1' 50' DOC, NO, DWG, NO. 99 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 100 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting an updated Quality Assurance Program (QAP) that provides sampling and testing procedures to ensure that materials incorporated into construction projects are in conformance with the contract specifications and Caltrans requirements for federal -aid projects. (Engineering/Public Works) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 100 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting an updated Quality Assurance Program (QAP) that provides sampling and testing procedures to ensure that materials incorporated into construction projects are in conformance with the contract specifications and Caltrans requirements for federal -aid projects. PREPARED BY: Jose Lopez, P.E., Associate Engineer DEPARTMENT: Engineering/Public Works PHONE: 619-336-4312 APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: Caltrans requires that all agencies receiving Federal -Aid funds through transportation grant programs adopt a Quality Assurance Program (QAP), and update the plan at least once every five years. The City last adopted a QAP on February 4, 2014, per Resolution No. 2014-13. Currently, the Engineering Division includes quality assurance procedures for materials sampling and testing as part of the contract specifications for individual capital improvement projects. The attached QAP summarizes these procedures and also includes forms and procedures established by Caltrans as part of their "Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Manual for Use by Local Agencies" to ensure compliance with the latest Federal and State requirements. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: APPROVED: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: N/A ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: N/A ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Quality Assurance Program I 1 ni ref 473 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM (QAP) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY The purpose of this program is to provide assurance that the materials incorporated into the construction projects are in conformance with the contract specifications. This program should be updated every five years or more frequent if there are changes of the testing frequencies or to the tests themselves. To accomplish this purpose, the following terms and definitions will be used: DEFINITION OF TERMS • Acceptance Testing (AD — Sampling and testing, or inspection, to determine the degree of compliance with contract requirements. • Independent Assurance Program (IAP) — Verification that AT is being performed correctly by qualified testers and laboratories. • Quality Assurance Program (OAP) — A sampling and testing program that will provide assurance that the materials and workmanship incorporated into the construction project are in conformance with the contract specifications. The main elements of a QAP are the AT, and IAP. • Source Inspection — AT of manufactured and prefabricated materials at locations other than th6 job site, generally at the manufactured location. • QAP Manual --- Quality Assurance Program Manual for local agencies which provides quality assurance guidelines for materials used in Federal Aid Projects. MATERIALS LABORATORY The City of National City will use a private consultant materials laboratory to perform AT on Federal -aid and other designated projects. The materials laboratory shall be under the responsible management of a California registered Engineer with experience in sampling, inspection and testing of construction materials. The Engineer shall certify the results of all tests performed by laboratory personnel under the Engineer's supervision. The materials laboratory shall contain certified test equipment capable of performing the tests conforming to the provisions of this QAP. The materials laboratory used shall provide documentation that the laboratory complies with the following procedures: 1. Correlation Testing Program — The materials laboratory shall be a participant in one or more of the following testing programs: a. AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL) b. Cement and Concrete Reference Laboratory (CCRL) c. Caltrans' Reference Samples Program (RSP) Updated January 2019 102 of 473 2. Certification of Personnel — The materials laboratory shall employ personnel who are certified by one or more of the following: a. Caltrans District Materials Engineer b. Nationally recognized non-Caltrans organizations such as the American Concrete Institute, Asphalt, National Institute of Certification of Engineering Technologies, etc. c. Other recognized organizations approved by the State of California and/or Recognized by local governments or private associations. 3. Laboratory and Testing Equipment — The materials laboratory shall only use laboratory and testing equipment that is in good working order. All such equipment shall be calibrated at least once each year. All testing equipment must be calibrated by impartial means using devices of accuracy traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology. A decal shall be firmly affixed to each piece of equipment showing the date of the last calibration. All testing equipment calibration decals shall be checked as part of the IAP. ACCEPTANCE TESTING (AT) AT will be performed by a materials laboratory certified to perform the required tests. The tests results will be used to ensure that all materials incorporated into the project are in compliance with the contract specifications, Testing methods will be in accordance with the California Test (CT) Methods or a national recognized standard (i.e., AASHTO, ASTM, etc.) as specified in the contract specifications. Sample locations and frequencies may be in accordance with the contract specifications. If not so specified in the contract specifications, samples shall be taken at the locations and frequencies as shown in Attachment #1, Appendix D, "Acceptance Sampling and Testing Frequencies" of the QAP Manual. INDEPENDENT ASSURANCE PROGRAM (IAP) IAP shall be provided by personnel from Caltrans, the Agency's certified materials laboratory, or consultant's certified materials laboratory. IAP will be used to verify that sampling and testing procedures are being performed properly and that all testing equipment is in good condition and properly calibrated. IAP personnel shall be familiar with all required testing procedures, as part of IAP, and shall not be involved in any aspect of AT. IAP shall be performed on every type of materials test required for the project. Proficiency tests shall be performed on Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent, and Cleanness Value tests. All other types of IAP shall be witness tests. Poor correlation between acceptance tester's results and other test results may indicate probable deficiencies with the acceptance sampling and testing procedures. In cases of unresolved discrepancies, a complete review of AT shall be performed by IAP personnel, or an independent materials laboratory chosen by the Agency. IAP samples and tests are not to be used for Updated January 2019 103 of 473 determining compliance with contract requirements. Compliance with contract requirements is determined only by AT. REPORTING ACCEPTANCE TESTING RESULTS The following are time periods for reporting material test results to the City: • When the aggregate is sampled at material plants, test results for Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent and Cleanness Value should be submitted to the Project Engineer within 24 hours after sampling. • When materials are sampled at the job site, test results for compaction and maximum density should be submitted to the Project Engineer within 24 hours after sampling. • When soils and aggregates are sampled at the job site: (1.) Test results for Sieve Analysis, Sand Equivalent and Cleanness Value should be submitted to the Project Engineer within 72 hours after sampling. (2.) Test results for "R" VaIue and asphalt concrete extraction should be submitted to the Project Engineer within 96 hours alter sampling. When sampling products such as Portland Cement Concrete (PCC), cement -treated base (CTB), hot mix asphalt (HMA), and other such materials; the time of such sampling shall be varied with respect to the time of the day insofar as possible, in order to avoid a predictable sampling routine. The reporting of AT results, if not performed by the agency staff, shall be done on an expedited basis such as by email, fax or telephone. TESTING OF MANUFACTURED MATERIALS During the Design phase of the project, the Project Engineer may submit a "Source Inspection Request" see Attachment #2, Exhibit 16-V of the Local Assistance Procedure Manual (LAPM), to the Agency, consultant, or Caltrans for inspection and testing of manufactured and prefabricated materials by their materials laboratory. A list of materials that can be typically accepted on the basis of certificates of compliance during construction is found in Attachment #3, Appendix F of the QAP Manual. All certificates of compliance shall conform to the requirements of the contract specifications, for examples see Attachment #4, Appendix J of the QAP Manual. Should the Agency request Caltrans to conduct the source inspection, and the request is accepted, all sampling, testing, and acceptance of manufactured and prefabricated materials will be performed by Caltrans' Office of Materials Engineering and Testing Services. For Federal -aid projects on the National Highway System (NHS), Caltrans will assist in certifying the materials laboratory, and the acceptance samplers and testers. For Federal -aid projects off the NHS, Caltrans may be able to assist in certifying the materials laboratory, and the acceptance samplers and testers. PROJECT CERTIFICATION Upon completion of a Federal -aid project, a "Materials Certificate" shall be completed by the Project Engineer. The Agency shall include a "Materials Certificate" in the Report of Expenditures submitted to the Caltrans District Director, Attention: District Local Assistance Engineer. A copy of the "Materials Certificate" shall also be included in the Agency's Updated January 2019 104 of 473 construction records. The Project Engineer in charge of the construction function for the Agency shall sign the certificate. All materials incorporated into the work which did not conform to specifications must be explained and justified on the "Materials Certification", including changes by virtue of contract change orders. See Attachment #5 for an example, Appendix K of the QAP Manual. RECORDS All material records of samples and tests, material releases and certificates of compliance for the construction project shall be incorporated into the Project Engineer's project file. If a Federal -aid project: • The files shall be organized as described in Section 16.8 "Project Files" of the Local Assistance Procedures Manual. • It is recommended that the complete project file be available at a single location for inspection by Caltrans and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) personnel. • The project files shall be available for at least three years following the date of final project voucher. • The use of a "Log Summary," as shown in Appendix H of the QAP Manual, facilitates reviews of material sampling and testing by Caltrans and FHWA, and assists the Project Engineer in tracking the frequency of testing. When two or more projects are being furnished identical materials simultaneously from the same plant, it is not necessary to take separate samples or perform separate tests for each project; however, copies of the test reports are to be provided for each of the projects to complete the records. APPROVED BY. (Signature) (CE# and Expiration Date) NAME: DATE. TITLE: City: Attachments #1 Acceptance Sampling and Testing Frequencies Attachments #2 Source Inspection Request, Exhibit 16-V of the LAPM Attachments #3 Appendix F of the QAP Manual Attachments #4 Appendix J of the QAP Manual Attachments #5 Appendix K of the QAP Manual Updated January 2019 105 of 473 Attachment # 1 Acceptance Sampling and Testing Frequencies 106 of 473 Appendix D - Acceptance Sampling and Testing Frequencies Note: It may be desirable to sample and store some materials. If warranted, testing can be performed at a later date. Portland Cement (Hydraulic Cement) Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Cement/fly ash (Sampling only) 8-Ib. sample If possible, take a least one sample per job, even'if the material is accepted based on a Certificate of Compliance. ASTM D75, C494 CT 125 AASHTO T127, M85, M295 Standard for sampling hydraulic cement or fly ash. Cement (Testing Only) 8-Ib. sample If the product is accepted based on a Certificate of Compliance, testing is not required. if the product is not accepted using a Certificate of Compliance, test at least once per job. ASTM C109 CT 515 AASHTO T106 If testing appears warranted, fabricate six 2-in. mortar cubes using the Portland (or hydraulic cement). Test for compressive strength. Portland Cement Concrete (Hydraulic Cement Concrete) Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Aggregate for Hydrau- lic Cement Concrete (Sampling & Testing) 50-Ib. sample Take one aggregate sample for each 1000 cu. yd. of PCC/HCC concrete. Test at least one sample per job. ASTM D75 CT 125 AASHTO M6. T2, M80 Sample aggregate from belt or hopper ( random basis). Water (Sampling & Testing) Take a two -quart sample using a clean plastic jug (with lining) and sealed lid. Sample at the point of use. if the water is clean with no record of chlorides or sulfates greater than 1%, no testing is required. If the water is dirty do not use it. Test only when the chloride or sulfates are suspected to be greater than I " /ii. CT 405, CT 422, CT 417 AASHTO R23 if testing appears warranted, test fi- chlorides and sulfates. i� Appendix D (continued) Portland Cement Concrete (Hydraulic Cement Concrete) — Continued Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description of Comments Air Entraining Admixtures (Sampling & Testing) Take a one -quart sample using a clean, lined can or plastic bottle, if liquid. If powder, take a 2.5 Ib. sample. If the product is accepted based on a Certificate of Compliance, testing is not required. Take one sample per job. Prior to sampling, check with Caltrans (METS) for acceptable brands and dosage rates. ASTM C233 AASHTO M154, T157, C260 If testing appears warranted, test for sulfates and chlorides Admixtures with sulfates and chlorides greater than 1% should not be used. Water Reducers or Set Retarders (Sampling & Testing) If liquid, take a 1-qt. sample using a clean plastic can. If powder, take a 2.5 lb. sample. If the product is accepted based on a Certificate of Compliance, no testing is required. If not, test once per job. Prior to using this product, please check with Caltrans (METS) for acceptable brands and dosage rates. ASTM C494 AASHTO M194 If testing appears warranted, test for sulfates and chlorides. Admixtures with sulfates and chlorides greater than 1% should not be used. Freshly -Mixed Concrete (Sampling) Approx. 1501b. (or 1 cu. ft.) near mixer discharge. When tests are required, take at least one sample for each 500 to 1000 cu. yd. of PCC/HCC. ASTM C172, C685 CT 539 AASI-ITO T141, M157 This describes a method to sample freshly -mixed concrete. Freshly -Mixed Concrete (Testing) Approx. 150 lb/ (or 1 cu. ft.) near mixer discharge. On projects with 500 cu. yd., or more, test at least one sample per job. ASTM C143 AASHTO T119 This test determines the slump of the freshly -mixed concrete. Freshly -Mixed Concrete (Testing) Approx. 150 lb/ (or 1 cu. ft.) near mixer discharge On projects with 500 cu. yd., or more. te;t at least one sample per job. ASTM C360 CT 533 This test determines the ball penetration of the freshly -mixed concrete. Freshly -Mixed Concrete (Testing) Approx. 150 lb/ (or 1 cu. ft.) near mixer discharge On projects with 500 cu. yd., or more, test at least one sample per job. ASTM C231 CT 504 AASHTO T152 This test determines the air content of freshly -mixed concrete (pressure method). Freshly -Mixed Concrete (Testing) Approx. 150 lb/ (or 1 cu. ft.) near mixer discharge On projects with 500 cu. yd., or more, test at Least one sample per job. ASTM C138 CT 518 AASHTO T121 This test determines the unit weight of freshly mixed concrete. Appendix D (continued) Portland Cement Concrete (hydraulic Cement Concrete) — Continued Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Freshly -Mixed Concrete (Testing) Approx. 150 lb/ (or 1 cu. ft.) near mixer discharge Fabricate at least two concrete cylinders per project. Test for compressive strength at least once for each 500 to 1,000 cu_ ydl of structural concrete. ASTM C39 CT 521 AASHTO T22 This test is used to fabricate 6" x 12" concrete cylinders. Compressive strengths are determined, when needed. Freshly -Mixed Concrete (Testing) Approximately 210 Ib. of concrete are needed to fabricate three concrete beams. One sample set for every 500 to 1,000 cu. yd. of concrete. ASTM C78 CT 31 AASHTO T97 & T23 This test is used to determine the flexural strength of simple concrete beams in third -point loading Soils and Aggregates Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Aggregate (Sampling) One 50-1b. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM D75 CT 125 AASITTO T2 This test describes the procedures to sample aggregate from the belt or hopper (random basis). Fine Aggregates (Testing) One 50-Ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM C128 CT 208 AASHTO T84 This test determines the apparent specific gravity of fine aggregates for bituminous mixes, cement treated bases and aggregate bases. Fine Aggregate (Testing) One 50-ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM C128 CT 207 AASHTO T84 This test determines the bulk specific gravity (SSD) and the absorption of material passing the No. 4 sieve. Coarse Aggregate (Testing) One 50-Ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 i tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. CT 206 This test determines the cleanness of coarse aggregate. hip N 0 Appendix D (continued) Soils and Aggregates - Continued Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Coarse Aggre- gate (Testing) One 50-Ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM C127 CT 227 AASHTO T85 This test determines the specific gravity and absorption of coarse aggregate (material retained on the No. 4 sieve). Soils and Aggregates (Testing) One 50-Ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM C136 CT 202 AASHTO T27 This test determines the gradation or soils and aggregates by sieve analysis. Soils and Aggregates (Testing) One 50-1b. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM D2419 CT 217 AASHTO T176 This test determines the Sand Equiva- lent of soils and aggregates. Soils and Aggregates (Testing) One 50-Ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 i tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM CI 17 AASHTO T11 This test determines the gradation for materials finer that the No. 200 sieve (by washing method). Soils and Aggregates (Testing) One 50-Ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM D3744 CT 229 AASHTO T210 This test determines the Durability Index of soils and aggregates. Soils and Aggregates (Testing) One 50-Ib. sample Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM D2844 CT 301 AASHTO T190 This test determines the Resistance Value (R-) and expansion pressure of compacted materials. Soils and Aggregates (Testing) One random location for every 2,500 sq. 11. Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM D2922 CT 231 AASHTO T238 This test determines field densities using the nuclear gage. Soils and Aggregates (Testing) One random location for every 2,500 sq. ft. Take one sample for every 500 to 1,000 tons of materials. Test at least one sample per project. ASTM D3017 CT 231 AASHTO T239 This test determines the water content using the nuclear gage. hip ty y 0 0 0 a 0 SD 0 CD CD 0 0 0 co 0 CA C7 0 CD 0 0 0- 5' cra w Appendix D (continued) Asphalt Binder Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency 1 Typical Test I Methods Description or Comments Asphalt Binder (Sampling) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Sample once per job at the asphalt concrete plant. CT 125 ASTM D 979 AASIITO T 168, T48 This procedure describes the proper method to sample the asphalt binder. Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Sample once per job at the asphalt concrete plant. ASTM D92, D117 AASHTO T 48 This test determines the flash point of the asphalt binder (by Cleveland open cup). Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D2872 & D92 CT 346 AASFITO T240 &T48 This test determines the rolling thin-film oven test (RTFO). Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D2042 AASHTO T44 This test determines the solubility of asphalt material in trichloroethylene. Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ' ASTM D2171 AASHTO T202 This test determines the dynamic viscosity, (absolute viscosity of asphalt @ 140 degrees F by the Vacuum Capillary Viscometer Poises). Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. , ASTM D5 AASHTO T49 This test determines the penetration of bitu- minous material cr 77 degrees F and per - tentage of original penetration from the residue. Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D113 AASHTO T51 This test determines the ductility of asphalt @ 77 degrees F. Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of' asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D2170 AASHTO T201 This test determines the kinematic viscosity of asphalt @275 degrees F (Centistoke). sip Appendix D (continued) Asphalt Binder - Continued Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D2171 AASHTO T202 This test determines the dynamic viscosity. (absolute viscosity of asphalt @ 140 degrees F by the Vacuum Capillary Viscometer Poises). Asphalt Binder (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D36 AASHTO T53 This test determines the softening point of asphalt. Asphalt Emulsified Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Emulsified Asphalt (Sampling) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D140, D979 CT 125 AASHTO T 40, T168 This test describes the procedure to sample the emulsified asphalt. Emulsified Asphalt (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D244 AASHTO T59 This test determines the sieve retention of emulsified asphalt. Emulsified Asphalt (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D244 AASHTO T59 This test determines the weight per gallon of emulsified asphalt. Emulsified Asphalt (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D244 AASHTO T59 This test determines the penetration of the emulsified asphalt. Emulsified Asphalt (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D244 CT 330 AASHTO T59 This test determines the residue @ 325 degrees F evaporation of emulsified asphalt. rio Ad z 90 r o ?;" o 70E. 1 B � 0 0ti 03 03 o 0- a c. d o tD w o ,0 crq R o n F. a co 70 0- A7 N O 0 r 1 Appendix D (continued) Asphalt Emulsified - Continued Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Emulsified Asphalt (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D4402 AASHTO T201 This test determines the Brookfield viscosity. Emulsified Asphalt (Testing) One 0.5-gal. sample placed in a clean, sealed can. Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D88 AASHTO T72 This test determines the Saybolt- Furol viscosity of emulsified asphalt @ 77 degrees F (seconds). Hot Mix Asphalt (Asphalt Concrete) — Concrete Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Asphalt Concrete (Sampling) Obtain one 30-Ib. sample each day of production Obtain one sample at the asphalt concrete plant for each 5,000 tons of asphalt concrete placed. ASTM D75, D140, D979 CT 125 AASHTO T 40, T168 This test describes the procedure to sample the asphalt concrete. Asphalt Concrete (Testing) 4" x 8" cores Take one 4" x 8" core for every 500 ft of paved roadway. ASTM D1188, D1560, D1561, D5361 CT 304 AASHTO T246, T247 This test determines the field density of street samples. Asphalt Concrete (Testing) Obtain one 30-1b. sample for each day of production Obtain one sample for every five cores taken. ASTM D1188, D1560, D1561, D5361 CT 304 AASHTO T246, T247 This test determines the laboratory density and relative compaction of asphalt concrete. Asphalt Concrete (Testing) 4" x 8" cores Obtain one sample for every live cores taken. ASTM D2726, D1188, D5361 This lest determines the specific gravity of compacted bituminous mixture dense- graded or non -absorptive. rip a3oad Dolman ;I 1sIssy 1E301 A(- Appendix D (continued) Hot Mix Asphalt (Asphalt Concrete) —Continued Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Asphalt Concrete (Testing) One 30-Ib sample Obtain one sample for every 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete. ASTM D1559 AASHTO T245 This test determines the resistance to plastic flow of prepared mixes as determined by the Marshall Method. Asphalt Concrete (Testing) One 30-1b sample Obtain one sample for every 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete. r ASTM C117, D2172 (use Method B) AASI-ITO T164 This test determines the screen analysis of aggregates recovered from asphalt materials. Geotextile Fabric (Placed Under the Asphalt Con- crete) (Testing) One 12 it x 3 ft. sample Obtain one sample per job. ASTM D4632 ' AASHTO M288 This test determines the weight per sq. yd. and grabs strength of geotextile fabrics. Asphalt Concrete (Testing) Sample any test location (random basis) Obtain one sample for every 1,000 tons of asphalt concrete. ASTM D2950 CT 375 This test detennines the nuclear field density of in -place asphalt concrete. Asphalt Concrete (Testing) One 10-lb sample Obtain one sample during every day of production. ASTM D1560, D1561 CT 366 AASHTO T246, T247 This test determines the stability value of asphalt concrete. Slurry Seals (Sample) One 0.5 gal. sample in a clean, dry plastic container. Obtain one sample per truck ASTM D979 CT 125 AASHTO T 40, T168 This test describes the procedure for sampling the slurry seal. Aggregate for Slurry Seals (Testing) One 30-Ib. sample. Obtain at least one sample per project from the belt or hopper or stockpile and test for Sand Equivalent ASTM D2419 CT217 AASHTO T176 This test determines the Sand Equivalent of aggregates. Appendix D (continued) Slurry Seals Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Aggregate for Slurry Seals (Testing) One 30-1b. sample. Obtain at least one sample per project from the belt, hopper, or stockpile and test for sieve analysis of fine sand. ASTM C117 AASHTO T11 This test determines the sieve analysis of fine sand (gradation of materials finer than No. 200 sieve by wash grading). Slurry Seals (Testing) One 0.5 gal. sample in a clean, dry plas- tic container. Test one sample per project and test for Abrasion. ASTM D3910 This test determines the Wet Track Abrasion Test (2) (WTAT). Steel Materials to be Sampled or Tested Sample Size Sampling/Testing Frequency Typical Test Methods Description or Comments Steel Strand (Testing) Sample strand at various sizes. This item may be accepted using a Certificate of Compliance. Sample and test at least two steel strands per job when a Certificate of Compliance! is not used. I ASTM A370, A416, E328 AASHTO T244 This test determines the tensile strength of uncoated seven -wire stress -relieved strand for pre - stressed concrete. Steel Rebar (Testing) Sample rebar at various sizes. This item may be accepted using a Certificate of I Compliance. Sample and test at least two steel rebar per job when a Certificate of Compliance is not used. ASTM A615, A370 AASHTO T244 This test determines the steel reinforcement bar tensile strength and bend capability. Attachment #2 Source Inspection Request, Exhibit 16-V of the Local Assistance Procedure Manual (LAPM) 116 of 473 Local Assistance Procedures Manual EXHIBIT 16-V Source Inspection Request to DLAE SAMPLE COVER MEMO SOURCE INSPECTION REQUEST FROM LOCAL AGENCY TO CALTRANS' DISTRICT LOCAL ASSISTANCE ENGINEER (Prepared By Applicant On Applicant Letterhead) To: (name) Caltrans' District Local Assistance Engineer Caltrans' Local Assistance Office (district office address) Date: Federal -aid Project Number: (if one has been assigned) Project Description: Project Location: Subject: (Source Inspection for Project Name, County) We are requesting that Caltrans provide Source Inspection (reimbursed) services for the above mentioned project. We understand we are responsible for paying for this service provided for by the State. Listed below are the materials for which we are requesting Caltrans' Source Inspection (reimbursed) services. Materials that will require source inspection: Justification for request: (Based on the requirements in Section 16.14 under "Source Inspection") Any question you might have about the above materials should be directed to: , at (phone #) Approved: (Applicant Representative Name) District Local Assistance Engineer (Title) (Date) (Local agency, name & address) Page 16-109 February 117 of 473 Attachment #3 Appendix F of the QAP Manual 118 of 473 Division of Local Assistance, Office of Procedures Development and Training am., Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Manual for Use by Local Agencies Revised January 20. 2011 �� .1 Appendix F - Construction Materials Accepted by a Certificate of Compliance * Soil Amendment Fiber Mulch Stabilizing Emulsion Plastic Pipe Lime Reinforcing Steel Structural Timber and Lumber Treated Timber and Lumber Timber and Lumber Culvert and Drainage Pipe Joints Reinforced Concrete Pipe Corrugated Steel Pipe and Corrugated Steel Pipe Arches Structural Metal Plate Pipe Arches and Pipe Arches Perforated Steel Pipe Polyvinyl Chloride Pipe and Polyethylene Tubing Steel Entrance Tapers, Pipe Down drains, Reducers, Coupling Bands and Slip Joints Aluminum -Pipe -(Entrance Tapers, -Arches, -Pipe -Down-drains,Reducers, CouplingBands and -S- Slip Joints) Metal Target Plates Electrical Conductors Portland Cement Minor Concrete Waterstop * If Caltrans Standard Specifications May 2006 is part of contract specifications. Note: Usually these items are inspected at the site of manufacture or fabrication and reinspected after delivery to the job site. 119 of 473 Attachment #4 Appendix J of the QAP Manual 120 of 473 Division of Local Assistance. Office of Procedures Development and Training GIs Quality Assurance Program (OAP) Manual for Use by Local Agencies Revised January 20, 2011 Appendix J.1 - Example of a Vendor's Certificate of Compliance No. 583408 STATE OF CALJFORNIA - DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION VENDOR'S CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE MR-0543 (REV. 5/93) OCT-7541.6020-2 0 PRECAST CONCRETE PRODUCTS OR [ ' SdU.YD W4LL TO: 15/L L sYA/,16"--R .P,E.sY,,M" rr ��VE /.cJ E — e/T Y OF' FG ,4TL %7,V1 We candy Mal the perdand camera, chemical ere manes! aemtrTvres contained N um immortal desc *e! &Mow are Osiers staled and comply wan apadfcwllons tot: CONTRACT NUMBER: CEMENT BRAND MLL LOCATION )SYZ CEMEnir CO_ M4°444/D) TYPE .yr ' fir/ CHEMICAL ADMIXTURE I. BRAND MANUFACTURER Arc /9vrliXTa� X TYPE Yz SUPPL /Er yl4-TER 2. BRAVO✓ MANUFACTURER TYPE CI-ECK UCf lF A ChEiJCAL AOLaXTIRE WAS NOT USES MINERAL ADMIXTURE MANUFACTURER CLASS PC, z2 . //VC . CI CHECK BOX IF A MINERAL AOAJxf{T£ WJ-S NJr USED CEINERY DATE fReadY,armier 7/ /e3 DATES OF FABRICATION (Pnml) LIST PRODUCTS TO WHICH CERTIFICATE APPLIES. ISho-..f:oand li. h dpeaa Hc, delivery SI 1 euniwn )w nudy-mrr.) MANUFACTURER OF CONCRE PRODUCTS 4. Br /11'• Y 4f7 By: AUTHORIZED RpRESENTAWNATU. E FM in RIM Original le Res. Engl. Roane DuPII.mc OSP 01 5562A 36 121 of 473 Division of Local Assistance, Office of Procedures Development and Training Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Manual for Use by Local Agencies Revised January 20, 2011 Appendix J.2 - Example of a Certificate of Compliance for Portland Cement (continued) This is to certify that the Portland Cement . Supplied by ABC Cement Company complies with all requirements for Type II Portland Cement when tested in accordance with ASTM C - 494. Local Agency Project No. Albert Jioivakow'va. HP21L — 5055 — 111 Quality Assurance Engineer ABC Cement Company Date: 07/07/07 . 37 122 of 473 Attachment #5 Appendix K of' the QAP Manual 123 of 473 EfrDivision of Local Assistance, Office of Procedures Development and Training &sum Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Manual for Use by Local Agencies Revised January 20, 2011 Appendix K - Examples of Materials Certificates/Exceptions (Signed by the Resident Engineer at the Completion of the Project) Federal -aid Project No.: Project HP21L — 5055 —111 Subject: Materials Certification This is to certify that the results of the tests on acceptance samples indicate that the materials incorporated in the construction work and the construction operations controlled by sampling n and testing were in conformity with the approved plans and specifications. All materials exceptions to the plans and specifications on this project are noted below. No exceptions were found to the plans and specifications on this project. Bill Sanders Resident Engineer (Print Name) BUT[Sancders 7/7/07 Resident Engineer (Signature) (Date) Note: The signed original of this certificate is placed in the Resident Engineer's project files and one copy is mailed to the DLAE and filed under "Report of Expenditures." See the attachment (next page) 3S 124 of 473 Division of Local Assistance, Office of Procedures Development and Training ,,, Quality Assurance Program (QAP) Manual for Use by Local Agencies Revised January 20, 2011 Appendix K (continued) Attachments: Materials Exceptions (Acceptance Testing) Type of Test Description of Work Total Tests Performed On the Project Number of Failed Tests Action Taken Slump Test Concrete Sidewalk 8 1 When the measured slump exceeded the maximum limit, the entire concrete load was rejected. Sand Equivalent Aggregate for Structural Concrete 10 1 The tested S.E. was 70 and the contract compliance specification was 71 minimum. However, the concrete 28-day compressive strength was 4800 psi. The concrete was considered adequate and no materials deductions were taken. Compaction Sub grade Material 12 1 One failed test was noted. The failed area was watered and reworked. When this was completed, a retest was performed. The retest was acceptable. Compaction Hot Mix As- phalt 12 1 One failed area was noted. It was reworked and retested. The second test met specifications. Bill Sanders al/ S a/naeGs, July 4, 2007 Resident Engineer (Print Name) Resident Engineer (Signature) Date 39 125 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 126 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a two-year Agreement with Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc., DBA; Rely Environmental for a not -to -exceed amount of $300,000 to provide on -call environmental compliance management services involving water quality, air quality, and hazardous materials; and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement. (Engineering/Public Works) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 126 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a two-year Agreement with Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc., DBA; Rely Environmental for a not -to -exceed amount of $300,000 to provide on -call environmental compliance management services involving water quality, air quality, and hazardous materials; and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement. PREPARED BY: Stephen Manganiello PHONE: 619-336-4382 EXPLANATION: See attached. DEPARTMENT: Engineying6P_u lie W rks APPROVED BY: `` itL 7 FINANCIAL STATEMENT: APPROVED: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: Funds appropriated in account # 001-416-030-299-0000 (Environmental Compliance Contract Services). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: N/A ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution approving an Agreement with Rely Environmental for a not -to -exceed amount of $300,000 to provide on -call erivironmental compliance management services. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Explanation 2. Agreement 3. Resolution 127 of 47 1 Explanation: The Engineering & Public Works Department advertised a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for various engineering, environmental, architectural and construction support services on February 2, 2017. The RFQ was advertised on the City's website, published in the San Diego Union Tribune, and e-mailed to over 100 professional consulting firms. The Department received 51 Statement of Qualifications (SOQs) from various firms by the March 6, 2017 deadline. Copies of the SOQs received are available in the Office of the City Engineer. The solicitation included a request for consultants specializing in environmental compliance management services involving water quality, air quality, and hazardous materials. Based on the strength of their SOQ and past performance, staff recommends executing a two-year Agreement (effective January 1, 2019) with the option to extend for one additional year with Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc., DBA; Rely Environmental for a not -to -exceed amount of $300,000. See Exhibit "A" for general scope of services and schedule of fees (to remain fixed throughout the term of the Agreement). Services will be provided "as -needed." Funding is available through the General Fund Environmental Compliance Contract Services account. 128 of 473 AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC., DBA; RELY ENVIRONMENTAL THIS AGREEMENT is entered into on this 22nd day of January, 2019, by and between the CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, a municipal corporation (the "CITY"), and Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc., DBA; Rely Environmental, a California corporation (the "CONSULTANT"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY desires to employ a CONSULTANT to provide on -call environmental compliance management services. WHEREAS, on February 2, 2017, the Engineering & Public Works Department advertised a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for on -call professional services for National City's Capital Improvement Program. WHEREAS, on March 6, 2017, the CONSULTANT submitted a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) in response to the RFQ, consistent with the requirements of the RFQ. WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that the CONSULTANT is a professional environmental consulting firm specializing in environmental compliance management and is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the CITY, and the CONSULTANT is willing to perform such services. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT. The CITY agrees to engage the CONSULTANT to provide on -call environmental compliance management services, and the CONSULTANT agrees to perform the services set forth here in accordance with all terms and conditions contained herein. The CONSULTANT represents that all services shall be performed directly by the CONSULTANT or under direct supervision of the CONSULTANT. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LENGTH OF AGREEMENT. This Agreement will become effective on January 1, 2019. The duration of this Agreement is for the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2020. This Agreement may be extended by mutual agreement upon the same terms and conditions for an additional one (1) year term. The Parties may exercise up to three, one-year extensions. Any extension of this Agreement must be approved in writing by the City Council. 129 of 473 3. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The CONSULTANT will perform services as needed, including, but not limited to, environmental compliance management involving water quality, air quality, and hazardous materials, further described and as set forth in Exhibit "A". The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all research and reviews related to the work and shall not rely on personnel of the CITY for such services, except as authorized in advance by the CITY. The CITY may unilaterally, or upon request from the CONSULTANT, from time to time reduce or increase the Scope of Services to be performed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement. Upon doing so, the CITY and the CONSULTANT agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction or increase in the compensation associated with said change in services. 4. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION. Stephen Manganiello, Director of Engineering & Public Works, hereby is designated as the Project Coordinator for the CITY and will monitor the progress and execution of this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall assign a single Project Director to provide supervision and have overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this Agreement for the CONSULTANT. Scott Storms, President, thereby is designated as the Project Director for the CONSULTANT. 5. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT. The compensation for the CONSULTANT shall be based on monthly billings covering actual work performed. Billings shall include labor classifications, respective rates, hours worked and also materials, if any. The total cost for all work described in Exhibit "A" shall not exceed $300,000. The compensation for the CONSULTANT'S work shall not exceed the rates set forth in Exhibit "A". Monthly invoices will be processed for payment and remitted within thirty (30) days from receipt of invoice, provided that work is accomplished consistent with Exhibit "A", as determined by the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall maintain all books, documents, papers, employee time sheets, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred, and shall make such materials available at its office at all reasonable times during the term of this Agreement and for three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement, for inspection by the CITY, and for furnishing of copies to the CITY, if requested. 6. ACCEPTABILITY OF WORK The CITY shall decide any and all questions which may arise as to the quality or acceptability of the services performed and the manner of performance, the acceptable completion of this Agreement, and the amount of compensation due. In the event the CONSULTANT and the CITY cannot agree to the quality or acceptability of the work, the manner of performance and/or the compensation payable to the CONSULTANT in this Agreement, the CITY or the CONSULTANT shall give to the other written notice. Within ten (10) business days, the CONSULTANT and the CITY shall each prepare a report which supports their position and file the same with the other party. The CITY shall, with reasonable diligence, determine the quality or acceptability of the work, the manner of performance and/or the compensation payable to the CONSULTANT. 7. DISPOSITION AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. The Memoranda, Reports, Maps, Drawings, Plans, Specifications, and other documents prepared by the CONSULTANT for this project, whether paper or electronic, shall become the property of the Standard Agreement Page 2 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 130 of 473 CITY for use with respect to this project, and shall be turned over to the CITY upon completion of the project, or any phase thereof, as contemplated by this Agreement. Contemporaneously with the transfer of documents, the CONSULTANT hereby assigns to the CITY, and CONSULTANT thereby expressly waives and disclaims any copyright in, and the right to reproduce, all written material, drawings, plans, specifications, or other work prepared under this Agreement, except upon the CITY'S prior authorization regarding reproduction, which authorization shall not be unreasonably withheld. The CONSULTANT shall, upon request of the CITY, execute any further document(s) necessary to further effectuate this waiver and disclaimer. The CONSULTANT agrees that the CITY may use, reuse, alter, reproduce, modify, assign, transfer, or in any other way, medium, or method utilize the CONSULTANT'S written work product for the CITY'S purposes, and the CONSULTANT expressly waives and disclaims any residual rights granted to it by Civil Code Sections 980 through 989 relating to intellectual property and artistic works. Any modification -or -reuse -by the CITY of documents, drawings, or-speuifrcations- prepared by the CONSULTANT shall relieve the CONSULTANT from liability under Section 14, but only with respect to the effect of the modification or reuse by the CITY, or for any liability to the CITY should the documents be used by the CITY for some project other than what was expressly agreed upon within the Scope of Services of this project, unless otherwise mutually agreed. 8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties hereto in the performance of this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners, or joint venturers with one another. Neither the CONSULTANT nor the CONSULTANT'S employees are employees of the CITY, and are not entitled to any of the rights, benefits, or privileges of the CITY'S employees, including but not limited to retirement, medical, unemploy- ment, or workers' compensation insurance. This Agreement contemplates the personal services of the CONSULTANT and the CONSULTANT'S employees, and it is recognized by the parties that a substantial inducement to the CITY for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of the CONSULTANT and its employees. Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned by the CONSULTANT without the prior written consent of the CITY. Nothing herein contained is intended to prevent the CONSULTANT from employing or hiring as many employees, or SUBCONSULTANTS, as the CONSULTANT may deem necessary for the proper and efficient performance of this Agreement. All agreements by CONSULTANT with its SUBCONSULTANT(S) shall require the SUBCONSULTANT(S) to adhere to the applicable terms of this Agreement. 9. CONTROL. Neither the CITY nor its officers, agents, or employees shall have any control over the conduct of the CONSULTANT or any of the CONSULTANT'S employees, except as herein set forth, and the CONSULTANT or the CONSULTANT'S agents, servants, or employees are not in any manner agents, servants, or employees of the CITY, it being understood that the CONSULTANT its agents, servants, and employees are as to the CITY wholly independent CONSULTANT, and that the CONSULTANT'S obligations to the CITY are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement. Standard Agreement Page 3 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 131 of 473 10. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW. The CONSULTANT, in the performance of the services to be provided herein, shall comply with all applicable state and federal statutes and regulations, and all applicable ordinances, rules, and regulations of the City of National City, whether now in force or subsequently enacted. The CONSULTANT and each of its SUBCONSULTANT(S), shall obtain and maintain a current City of National City business license prior to and during performance of any work pursuant to this Agreement. 11. LICENSES, PERMITS, ETC. The CONSULTANT represents and covenants that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to practice its profession. The CONSULTANT represents and covenants that the CONSULTANT shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, any license, permit, or approval which is legally required for the CONSULTANT to practice its profession. 12. STANDARD OF CARE. A. The CONSULTANT, in performing any services under this Agreement, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the CONSULTANT'S trade or profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. The CONSULTANT shall take all special precautions necessary to protect the CONSULTANT'S employees and members of the public from risk of harm arising out of the nature of the work and/or the conditions of the work site. B. Unless disclosed in writing prior to the date of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT warrants to the CITY that it is not now, nor has it for the five (5) years preceding, been debarred by a governmental agency or involved in debarment, arbitration or litigation proceedings concerning the CONSULTANT'S professional performance or the furnishing of materials or services relating thereto. C. The CONSULTANT is responsible for identifying any unique products, treatments, processes or materials whose availability is critical to the success of the project the CONSULTANT has been retained to perform, within the time requirements of the CITY, or, when no time is specified, then within a commercially reasonable time. Accordingly, unless the CONSULTANT has notified the CITY otherwise, the CONSULTANT warrants that all products, materials, processes or treatments identified in the project documents prepared for the CITY are reasonably commercially available. Any failure by the CONSULTANT to use due diligence under this sub -section will render the CONSULTANT liable to the CITY for any increased costs that result from the CITY'S later inability to obtain the specified items or any reasonable substitute within a price range that allows for project completion in the time frame specified or, when not specified, then within a commercially reasonable time. 13, NON-DISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS. The CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. The CONSULTANT will take positive action to insure that applicants are employed without regard to their age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. Such action shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONSULTANT agrees to post in Standard Agreement Page 4 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 132 of 473 conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause. 14. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. The CITY may from time to time communicate to the CONSULTANT certain confidential information to enable the CONSULTANT to effectively perform the services to be provided herein. The CONSULTANT shall treat all such information as confidential and shall not disclose any part thereof without the prior written consent of the CITY. The CONSULTANT shall limit the use and circulation of such information, even within its own organization, to the extent necessary to perform the services to be provided herein. The foregoing obligation of this Section 14, however, shall not apply to any part of the information that (i) has been disclosed in publicly available sources of information; (ii) is, through no fault of the CONSULTANT, hereafter disclosed in publicly available sources of information; (iii) is already in the possession of the CONSULTANT without any obligation of confidentiality; or (iv) has been or is hereafter rightfully disclosed to the CONSULTANT by a third party, but only to the extent that the use or disclosure thereof has been or is rightfully authorized by that third party. The CONSULTANT shall not disclose any reports, recommendations, conclusions or other results of the services or the existence of the subject matter of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the CITY. In its performance hereunder, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all legal obligations it may now or hereafter have respecting the information or other property of any other person, firm or corporation. CONSULTANT shall be liable to CITY for any damages caused by breach of this condition, pursuant to the provisions of Section 15. 15. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. The CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City, its officers, officials, agents, employees, and volunteers against and from any and all liability, loss, damages to property, injuries to, or death of any person or persons, and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, reasonable attorneys' fees, and defense costs, of any kind or nature, including workers' compensation claims, of or by anyone whomsoever, resulting from or arising out of the CONSULTANT'S performance or other obligations under this Agreement; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the established sole negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its agents, officers, employees or volunteers. CITY will cooperate reasonably in the defense of any action, and CONSULTANT shall employ competent counsel, reasonably acceptable to the City Attorney. The indemnity, defense, and hold harmless obligations contained herein shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any alleged or actual omission, act, or negligence under this Agreement that occurred during the term of this Agreement. 16. WORKERS' COMPENSATION. The CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Labor Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar State or federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, and hold harmless the CITY and its officers, employees, and volunteers from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings, and judgments of every nature and description, including reasonable attorney's fees and defense costs presented, brought or recovered against the CITY or its officers, employees, or volunteers, for or on account of any Standard Agreement Page 5 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 133 of 473 liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement. 17. INSURANCE. The CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, shall purchase and maintain, and shall require its SUBCONSULTANT(S), when applicable, to purchase and maintain throughout the term of this Agreement, the following insurance policies: A. M If checked, Professional Liability Insurance (errors and omissions) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. B. Automobile Insurance covering all bodily injury and property damage incurred during the performance of this Agreement, with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident. Such automobile insurance shall include owned, non -owned, and hired vehicles ("any auto"). The policy shall name the CITY and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds, and a separate additional insured endorsement shall be provided. C. Commercial General Liability Insurance, with minimum limits of either $2,000,000 per occurrence and $4,000,000 aggregate, or $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 aggregate with a $2,000,000 umbrella policy, covering all bodily injury and property damage arising out of its operations, work, or performance under this Agreement. The policy shall name the CITY and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds, and a separate additional insured endorsement shall be provided. The general aggregate limit must apply solely to this "project" or "location". The "project" or "location" should be noted with specificity on an endorsement that shall be incorporated into the policy. D. Workers' Compensation Insurance in an amount sufficient to meet statutory requirements covering all of CONSULTANT'S employees and employers' liability insurance with limits of at least $1,000,000 per accident. In addition, the policy shall be endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the CITY. Said endorsement shall be provided prior to commencement of work under this Agreement. If CONSULTANT has no employees subject to the California Workers' Compensation and Labor laws, CONSULTANT shall execute a Declaration to that effect. Said Declaration shall be provided to CONSULTANT by CITY. E. The aforesaid policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the CITY, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers, so that any other policies held by the CITY shall not contribute to any loss under said insurance. Said policies shall provide for thirty (30) days prior written notice to the CITY's Risk Manager, at the address listed in subsection G below, of cancellation or material change. F. If required insurance coverage is provided on a "claims made" rather than "occurrence" form, the CONSULTANT shall maintain such insurance coverage for three years after expiration of the tern (and any extensions) of this Agreement. In addition, the "retro" date must be on or before the date of this Agreement. G. The Certificate Holder for all policies of insurance required by this Section shall be: City of National City c/o Risk Manager 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-4397 Standard Agreement Page 6 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 134 of 473 H, Insurance shall be written with only insurers authorized to conduct business in California that hold a current policy holder's alphabetic and financial size category rating of not less than A:VII according to the current Best's Key Rating Guide, or a company of equal financial stability that is approved by the CITY'S Risk Manager. In the event coverage is provided by non -admitted "surplus lines" carriers, they must be included on the most recent California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI list) and otherwise meet rating requirements. I. This Agreement shall not take effect until certificate(s) or other sufficient proof that these insurance provisions have been complied with, are filed with and approved by the CITY'S Risk Manager. If the CONSULTANT does not keep all of such insurance policies in full force and effect at all times during the terms of this Agreement, the CITY may elect to treat the failure to maintain the requisite insurance as a breach of this Agreement and terminate the Agreement as provided herein. J. All deductibles and self -insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be disclosed to and approved by the CITY. CITY reserves the right to modify the insurance requirements of this Section 17, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. K. If the CONSULTANT maintains broader coverage or higher limits (or both) than the minimum limits shown above, the CITY requires and shall be entitled to the broader coverage or higher limits (or both) maintained by the CONSULTANT. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY. 18. LEGAL FEES. If any party brings a suit or action against the other party arising from any breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any inaccuracies in any of the representations and warranties on the part of the other party arising out of this Agreement, then in that event, the prevailing party in such action or dispute, whether by final judgment or out -of - court settlement, shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other party all costs and expenses of suit, including attorneys' fees. For purposes of determining who is to be considered the prevailing party, it is stipulated that attorney's fees incurred in the prosecution or defense of the action or suit shall not be considered in determining the amount of the judgment or award. Attorney's fees to the prevailing party if other than the CITY shall, in addition, be limited to the amount of attorney's fees incurred by the CITY in its prosecution or defense of the action, irrespective of the actual amount of attorney's fees incurred by the prevailing party. 19. TERMINATION. A. This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by the CITY. Termination without cause shall be effective only upon 60-day's written notice to the CONSULTANT. During said 60-day period the CONSULTANT shall perform all services in accordance with this Agreement. B. This Agreement may also be terminated immediately by the CITY for cause in the event of a material breach of this Agreement, misrepresentation by the CONSULTANT in connection with the formation of this Agreement or the performance of services, or the failure to perform services as directed by the CITY. Standard Agreement Page 7 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 135 of 473 C. Termination with or without cause shall be effected by delivery of written Notice of Termination to the CONSULTANT as provided for herein. D. In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished Memoranda Reports, Maps, Drawings, Plans, Specifications and other documents prepared by the CONSULTANT, whether paper or electronic, shall immediately become the property of and be delivered to the CITY, and the CONSULTANT shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of the Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused the CITY by the CONSULTANT'S breach, if any. Thereafter, ownership of said written material shall vest in the CITY all rights set forth in Section 7. E. The CITY further reserves the right to immediately terminate this Agreement upon: (1) the filing of a petition in bankruptcy affecting the CONSULTANT; (2) a reorganization of the CONSULTANT for the benefit of creditors; or (3) a business reorganization, change in business name or change in business status of the CONSULTANT. 20. NOTICES. All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered; or sent by overnight mail (Federal Express or the like); or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested; or sent by ordinary mail, postage prepaid; or telegraphed or cabled; or delivered or sent by telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax; and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (i) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice, (ii) if sent by overnight mail, the business day following its deposit in such overnight mail facility, (iii) if mailed by registered, certified or ordinary mail, five (5) days (ten (10) days if the address is outside the State of California) after the date of deposit in a post office, mailbox, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service, (iv) if given by telegraph or cable, when delivered to the telegraph company with charges prepaid, or (v) if given by telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax, when sent. Any notice, request, demand, direction or other communication delivered or sent as specified above shall be directed to the following persons: To CITY: Stephen Manganiello Director of Engineering & Public Works Engineering & Public Works Department City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-4301 To CONSULTANT: Scott Storms President Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner specified in this Section. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice, Standard Agreement Page 8 of 11 City ofNational City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 136 of 473 demand, request or communication sent. Any notice, request, demand, direction or other communication sent by cable, telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax must be confirmed within forty- eight (48) hours by letter mailed or delivered as specified in this Section. 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND POLITICAL REFORM ACT OBLIGATIONS. During the term of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall not perform services of any kind for any person or entity whose interests conflict in any way with those of the City of National City. The CONSULTANT also agrees not to specify any product, treatment, process or material for the project in which the CONSULTANT has a material financial interest, either direct or indirect, without first notifying the CITY of that fact. The CONSULTANT shall at all times comply with the terms of the Political Reform Act and the National City Conflict of Interest Code, The CONSULTANT shall immediately disqualify itself and shall not use its official position to influence in any way any matter coming before the CITY in which the CONSULTANT has a financial interest as defined in Government Code Section 87103. The CONSULTANT represents that it has no knowledge of any financial interests that would require it to disqualify itself from any matter on which it might perform services for the CITY. ❑ If checked, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the reporting requirements of the Political Reform Act and the National City Conflict of Interest Code. Specifically, the CONSULTANT shall file a Statement of Economic Interests with the City Clerk of the City of National City in a timely manner on forms which the CONSULTANT shall obtain from the City Clerk. The CONSULTANT shall be strictly liable to the CITY for all damages, costs or expenses the CITY may suffer by virtue of any violation of this Section 21 by the CONSULTANT. 22. PREVAILING WAGES. State prevailing wage rates may apply to work performed under this Agreement. State prevailing wages rates apply to all public works contracts as set forth in California Labor Code, including but not limited to, Sections 1720, 1720.2, 1720.3, 1720.4, and 1771. Consultant is solely responsible to determine if State prevailing wage rates apply and, if applicable, pay such rates in accordance with all laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations. 23. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Computation of Time Periods. If any date or time period provided for in this Agreement is or ends on a Saturday, Sunday or federal, state or legal holiday, then such date shall automatically be extended until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or federal, state, or legal holiday. B. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute but one and the same instrument. C. Captions. Any captions to, or headings of, the sections or subsections of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties hereto, are not a part of this Agreement, and shall not be used for the interpretation or determination of the validity of this Agreement or any provision hereof, D. No Obligations to Third Parties. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon, or obligate any of the parties hereto, to any person or entity other than the parties hereto. Standard Agreement Page 9 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 137 of 473 E. Exhibits and Schedules. The Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto are hereby incorporated herein by this reference for all purposes. To the extent any exhibits, schedules, or provisions thereof conflict or are inconsistent with the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall control. F. Amendment to this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement may not be modified or amended except by an instrument in writing executed by each of the parties hereto. G. Waiver. The waiver or failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any future breach of any such provision or any other provision hereof. H. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The venue for any action shall be a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of San Diego, State of California. I. Audit. If this Agreement exceeds ten -thousand dollars ($10,000), the parties shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor for a period of three (3) years after final payment under the Agreement, per Government Code Section 8546.7. J. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreements, negotiations and communications, oral or written, and contains the entire agreement between the parties as to the subject matter hereof. No subsequent agreement, representation, or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to an employee, officer, agent or representative of any party hereto shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby. K. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. L. Subcontractors or Subconsultants. The CITY is engaging the services of the CONSULTANT identified in this Agreement. The CONSULTANT shall not subcontract any portion of the work, unless such subcontracting was part of the original proposal or is allowed by the CITY in writing. In the event any portion of the work under this Agreement is subcontracted, the subconsultant(s) shall be required to comply with and agree to, for the benefit of and in favor of the CITY, both the insurance provisions in Section 17 and the indemnification and hold harmless provision of Section 15 of this Agreement. M. Construction. The parties acknowledge and agree that (i) each party is of equal bargaining strength, (ii) each party has actively participated in the drafting, preparation and negotiation of this Agreement, (iii) each such party has consulted with or has had the opportunity to consult with its own, independent counsel and such other professional advisors as such party has deemed appropriate, relative to any and all matters contemplated under this Agreement, (iv) each party and such party's counsel and advisors have reviewed this Agreement, (v) each party has agreed to enter into this Agreement following such review and the rendering of such advice, and (vi) any rule or construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement, or any portions hereof, or any amendments hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed. this Agreement on the date and year first above written. Standard Agreement Page 10 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 138 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AIR QUALITY COMPLIANCE SOLUTIONS, INC., DBA; ' LY ENVIRONMENTAL By: By: Alejandra Sotelo-Solis, Mayor S ott Sto President By: S Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: Angil P. Morris -Jones City Attorney By: Roberto M. Contreras Deputy City Attorney Standard Agreement Page 11 of 11 City of National City and Revised July 2017 Rely Environmental 139 of 473 Client#: 67184 AIRQUALI ACORDTM CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 12/28/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on thls certificate does not confer any rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Frenkel & Company 350 Hudson Street 4th Floor New York, NY 10014 CONTACT Christi Nistler PHONE 212.488-0230 Fax MAIL, No, Ext): {Arc, No): 646-514-9597 E-MAIL cnistier@frenkel.com ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC it INSURER A: Westchester Surplus Lines Co 10172 INSURED Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc. 2415 Poinsettia Drive San Diego, CA 92106 INSURER B: INSURER C: INSURERD: INSURER E : INSURER F: . COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS Or SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSR SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF (MM/DD/YYYY)JMMIDD/YYYYL POLICY EXP LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X G24367022003 02/16/2017 02/16/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 $ 54,000 CLAIMS -MADE I X OCCUR PRYMI3E5TtEa occu rence) X Contractor Pollution MED EXP (Any one person) $10,000 X Occurence form PERSONAL&ADVINJURY $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $4,000,000 $ GEN'L X AGGREGATE POLICY OTHER: LIMITAPjPLIES MOTI PER: LOC GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG A AUTOMOBILE _ LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED AUTOS ONLY HIREDTOS ONLY AU ''— X SCHEDULED AUTOS N• AUTONOOWNESONLY D G24367022003 02/16/2017 02/16/2019 (EaaBolde1l INGLE LIMIT $1,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accidenlL $ UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITYR ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) II yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below Y N N / A PERTUTE j TH E.L. EACI-1 ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ A Prot.Liab. G24367022003 02/16/2017 02/16/2019 Each Claim : $2,000 000 Deductible : $2,500 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may he attached It more space Is required) City of National City is added as Additional Insured to the General Liabili y as required by written contract, but only as respects all covered operations of the Named Insured performed on behalf of the Additional insured. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of National City Attn: Finance Dept. -Purchasing Division 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950-4301 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) 1 of 1 #S1359380/M1188356 ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ALAK1 140 of 473 Cf lent#: 67184 AIRQUALI ACORDT. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE(MM/DD/YYYY) 12/28/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer any rights to the certificate holder In lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Frenkel & Company - 350 Hudson Street 4th Floor New York, NY 10014 O TACF A E; Christi Nistler (NC N , Eat): 212-488-0230 (F/M No); 646-514-9597 aDoFIEss: cnistier@frenkel.com INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAILtl INSURER A : Westchester Surplus Lines Co 10172 INSURED Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc. 2415 Poinsettia Drive San Diego, CA 92106 INSURER B : INSURER C: INSURER D INSURER E ; INSURER F : BER: • THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. y7p TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSR SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF (MM/DDIYYYY) POLICY EXP (MM/DDIYYYY) LIMITS A X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY G24367022003 02/16/2017 02/16/2019 EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $50,000 X Contractor Pollution MED EXP (Any one person) $10,000 X Occurence form PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $4,000,000 1POLICY PRO - JECT LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGO $4,000,000 OTHER: $ A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY G24367022003 02/16/2017 02/16/2019 (EOa dEern SINGLE LIMIT $1,000,000 _OWNED ANY AUTO BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ AUTOS ONLY SCHEDULED AUTOS BODILY INJURY(Per accident ) $ X HIRED AUTOS ONLY X NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accldenl) $ $ UMBRELLALIAB — OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ EXCESS LIAR CLAIMS -MADE AGGREGATE $ DED RETENTION $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY j PER STATUTE OTH- ER ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? y N N / A E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ (Mandatory In NH) E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ I( yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ A Prof.Liab. G24367022003 02/16/2017 02/16/2019 Each Claim : $2,000 000 Deductible : $2,500 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Addll(onal Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space Is required} Evidence of Insurance Only. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of National City 2100 Hoover Ave National City, CA 91960 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ,�► �,�. dot ©1988.2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ACORD 25 (2016/03) 1 of 1 The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD #51359379/M1188356 ALAK1 141 of 473 Named Insured Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc. Endorsement Number Policy Symbol ECP Policy Number G24367022 003 Policy Period 02/18/2017 to 02/16/2019 Effective Date of Endorsement 02/16/2017 issued By (Name of Insurance Company) Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company Insert the policy number. The remainder of the information is to be completed only when this endorsement is issued subsequent to the preparation of the policy. THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT OWNERS, LESSEES OR CONTRACTORSSCHEDULEDPERSON OR ORGANIZATION This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE CONTRACTOR'S POLLUTION LIABILITY COVERAGE SCHEDULE: Name of Person or Organization: Any person or organization that is an owner of real property or personal property on which you are performing operations, or a contractor on whose behalf you are performing operations, and only at the specific written request of such person or organization to you, wherein such request is made prior to commencement of operations. (If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations as applicable to this endorsement.) A. SECTION II - WHO IS AN INSURED is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of your ongoing operations performed for that insured. B. With respect to the insurance afforded to these additional insureds, the following exclusion is added: 2. Exclusions This insurance does not apply to bodily injury or property damage occurring after: (1) All work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insureds) at the site of the covered operations has been completed; or (2) That portion of your work out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project. ENV-3100 (08-04) Includes copyrighted material of Insurance Services Office, Inc. with its permission Page 1 of 1 142 of 473 OP ID: PM '41. �-- CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE 12I28/2018Y' (MM2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the pollcy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Gateway Insurance Agency 207 North Ditmar St Oceanside, CA 92054- CONTACT Paula Meeks PHONE FAX (A/C, No, at): 760-439-1323 (MC, No): 760-439-6905 nI DRless: paula@gatewayautoandhome.com PRODUCER STOR.SC1 CUSTOMER ID #: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURED Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc DBA Rely Environmental 2415 Poinsettia Dr San Diego, CA 92106 INSURER A: Infinity Insurance Company 22268 INSURER B : INSURER C; INSURER D : INSURER E INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. ILTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSR SUBR wVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF (MM/DDIYYYY), POLICY EXP (MMIDDIYYYY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY OCCUR EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ CLAIMS -MADE MED EXP (Any one person) $ GENL PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY J CT n LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ $ A A A AUTOMOBILE X X X LIABILITY 504610022689001 03/22/2018 03/22/2019 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) $ 1,000,000 BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY (PER ACCIDENT) DAMAGE $ $ UMBRELLAL1AB EXCESS LIAB OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) I(yes. describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS Y / N N / A WCSTATU- OTH- TORY LIMITS ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS! LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (Attach ACORD 101, Additional Romarks Schedule if more spaoe is required) CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION City of National City 1243 National City Blvd National City, CA 91950 SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2009/09) ©1988-2009 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD 143 of 473 ReIVEnvircuurlentat 12/17/2018 Stephen Manganiello Director of Public Works/City Engineer City of National City Engineering & Public Works Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Dear Mr. Mangeniello, EXHIBIT "A" We make compliance easy Rely Environmental is a small team of environmental professionals with a mission to help municipalities, businesses, hospitals and other institutions in Southern California comply with environmental regulations. We have been providing environmental compliance consulting services to entities in Southern California for 16 years. Rely provides services that are thorough, cost effective and objective based. Rely Environmental has extensive experience in the municipal environmental compliance field. We currently provide services to the following public agencies in Southern California: • City of Oceanside • City of San Marcos • City of La Mesa • City of Carlsbad • City of El Cajon • City of Vista • City of Poway • Vallecitos Water District • San Diego Metro Transit Service Rely Environmental has an excellent reputation with regulatory agencies. We foster this relationship actively and leverage it to our client's advantage whenever possible. We take pride in the work we do. Rely Environmental is detail oriented and data driven to provide the best customer service possible while simultaneously understanding the final consumers of our product are local regulatory agencies. Thank you again for this opportunity to provide services to the City of National City. Best regards, Scott Storms, President, Rely Environmental Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relvenvirontnental.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 1 of 8 144 of 473 Proposal: Environmental Compliance Consulting for the City of National City Rely Environmental Version: 3.0 Submitted on: 12/17/2018 1. Executive Summary The City of National City operates numerous facilities with activities and equipment that are regulated by federal, state and local environmental agencies. While individual requirements are not burdensome, taken together the management can become difficult and confusing. Rely Environmental proposes to continue providing expert and timely environmental compliance management consulting to the City of National City. The six primary environmental agencies that regulate the City of National City are: a. San Diego County Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Division b. San Diego County Air Pollution Control District c. California Air Resources Board d. Department of Toxic Substances Control e. California Air Resources Board 2. Contact Information a. Legal name and address: Air Quality Compliance Solutions, Inc., DBA: Rely Environmental b. Legal form of company: California Corporation as per Subchapter S c. Address of office working on project: 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 d. Proposal contact information: Scott Storms Phone: 619-379-1457 Fax: 619-374-7133 Email: sstorms@relyenvironmental.com Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relvenvironmental.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 2of8 145 of 473 3. Identification of services Rely Environmental proposes to provide environmental consulting services to maintain compliance with the following four regulatory agencies: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Division The San Diego County Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Division (SDDEH,HMD) is the local agency that is authorized to implement and enforce California's environmental health laws relating to: 1. Hazardous materials 2, Hazardous waste 3. Universal waste 4. Medical waste 5. Underground Storage Tanks 6. Above Ground Petroleum Storage Tanks 7. Accidental Release Program 8. California Environmental Reporting System San Diego County Air Pollution Control District The San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SD-APCD) implements and enforces stationary and portable source air pollution regulations in the County of San Diego. These regulations are found in the California Health and Safety Code, the California Code of Regulations and the SD-APCD local rule book. Cities such as the City of National City typically have a small number of regulated equipment and activities that include: 1. Emergency generators 2. Boilers 3. Portable equipment 4. Landfills 5. Asbestos removal California Air Resources Board The California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulates portable and mobile emission sources in the State of California. Cities typically have the following equipment that is regulated by CARE: 1. On -road, heavy-duty diesel vehicles 2. Off -road, heavy-duty diesel equipment 3. Portable diesel equipment 4. Asbestos removal Rely Environmental has an excellent reputation with regulatory agencies. We foster this relationship actively and leverage it to our client's advantage whenever possible. We emphasize customer service to our clients while simultaneously understanding that the final consumers of our product are local regulatory agencies. Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relvenvironmental.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 3 of 8 146 of 473 4. Scopes of work: i. Hazardous materials and waste inspections: 1. Verify current UPF Permit 2. Inspect storage of hazardous materials and hazardous/universal/medical waste to verify: a. Proper storage b. Proper labeling c. Allowed retention times are met d, Correct documentation of removal 3. Verify current required training 4. Provide inspection report ii. Emergency generator inspections: 1. Review permit 2. Review operational records 3. Verify operation is in compliance with permit limits 4. Review maintenance log 5. Review O&M manual availability 6. Provide inspection report iii. Complyrs environmental management software Complyrs is the first -of -its -kind compliance management tool designed specifically for the needs of California facility managers. Complyrs offers compliance program management for: 1, Hazardous materials 2. Hazardous waste 3. Underground storage tanksl 4. Above ground petroleum storage 5. Medical waste 6. Universal waste 7. California Environmental Reporting System (CERS) 8. Emergency diesel engines 9. Stormwater iv. In person training sessions/online training Sites can have in -person training on online training of the following subjects: 1, Hazardous materials and waste 2. Stormwater pollution prevention 3. Aboveground petroleum storage 4. Vapor recovery systems 5. Underground storage tank operation 6. Using safety data sheets (SDS) 7. Electrical safety 8. Ergonomics 9. Fire safety 10. Hazardous communication, biological hazards, bloodborne pathogens, PPEs 11. Slip and fall, floors, walkways, and lighting 12. Workplace violence Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relvenvironmental.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 4 of 8 147 of 473 v. SDS inventory and website SDS follow up inspections and updates 1. On a biannual basis, conduct a follow-up inventory of all assigned locations 2. After each inspection, provide an updated inventory to facility staff and National City management to determine if any items need to be added to the inventory or if any items can be changed to an archived status 3. Update any SDS that have been superseded by new versions 4. Deliver updated QR code posters to each site 5. Upload SDSs to Internet access portal vi. CERS review 1. Facility information 2. Emergency contacts 3. Business activities 4. Hazardous materials inventory 5. Site map 6. Emergency response plan 7. Training plan 5. work plan and pricing For the activities listed in a: Scopes of Work Hazardous materials and waste inspections Number of times/year Unit Price Annual billing Public Works Yard 12 $ 300 $ 3,600 Fire Station #31 2 $ 300 $ 600 Fire Station #34 2 $ 300 $ 600 Police Station 2 $ 300 $ 600 Municipal Pool 2 $ 300 $ 600 Morgan and Kimball Towers 2 $ 300 $ 600 City Hall 2 $ 300 $ 600 Tradesman Shop 2 $ 300 $ 600 Sub total $ 7,800 Emergency generator inspections Number of times/year Unit Price Annual billing Fire Station #31 2 $ 150 $ 300 Fire Station #34 2 $ 150 $ 300 Police Station 2 $ 150 $ 300 Morgan and Kimball Towers 2 $ 150 $ 300 City Hall 2 $ 150 $ 300 Sub total $ 1,500 Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relvenvi ronm a ntal.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 5 of 8 148 of 473 Comp[yrs environmental management software Number of times/year Unit Price Annual billing Public Works Yard 12 $ 25 $ 300 Fire Station #31 12 $ 10 $ 120 Fire Station #34 12 $ 10 $ 120 Police Station 12 $ 10 $ 120 Municipal Pool 12 $ 10 $ 120 Morgan and Kimball Towers 12 $ 10 $ 120 City Hall 12 $ 10 $ 120 Tradesman Shop 12 $ 10 $ 12Q Sub total $ 1,140 Training: in person Number of times/year Unit Price Annual billing Public Works Yard 1 $ 300 $ 300.. Fire Station #31 1 $ 300 $ 300. Fire Station #34 1 $ 300 $ 300 Police Station 1 $ 300 $ 300 Municipal Pool 1 $ 300 $ 300 Morgan and Kimball Towers 1 $ 300 $ 300 City Hall 1 $ 300 $ 300 Tradesman Shop 1 $ 300 $ 300 Sub total $ 2,400 Online training access Number of times/year Unit Price Annual billing Public Works Yard 1 $ 100 $ 100 Fire Station #31 1 $ 100 $ 100 Fire Station #34 1 $ 100 $ 100 Police Station 1 $ 100 $ 100 Municipal Pool 1 $ 100 $ 100 Morgan and Kimball Towers 1 $ 100 $ 100 City Hall 1 $ 100 $ 100 Tradesman Shop 1 $ 100 $ 100 Sub total $ 800 SDS inventory and website Number of times/year Unit Price Annual billing Aquatic Center 2 $ 200 $ 400 ARTS Building 2 $ 200 $ 400 Camacho Gym 2 $ 200 $ 400 Casa De Salud 2 $ 200 $ 400 Civic Center (City Hall) 2 $ 200 $ 400 El Toyon Rec Center 2 $ 200 $ 400 Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relyenvironmental.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 6 of 8 149 of 473 Fire Station 33 2 $ 200 $ 400 Fire Station 34 2 $ 200 $ 400 Fire Station 31 2 $ 200 $ 400 Kimball Rec Center 2 $ 200 $ 400 Morgan & Kimball Towers 2 $ 200 $ 400 Nutrition Center in M & K Towers 2 $ 200 $ 400 Kimball Senior Center 2 $ 200 $ 400 Martin Luther King Comm. 2 $ 200 $ 400 Municipal Pool 2 $ 200 $ 400 Police Department 2 $ 200 $ 400 Public Library 2 $ 200 $ 400 Public Works 2 $ 200 $ 400 Public Works 2 2 $ 200 $ 400 Sub total $ 7,600 CERS account management (estimate) Unit Price (hourly) Unit count Annual billing Public Works Yard $ 120 4 $ 480 Fire Station #31 $ 120 4 $ 480 Fire Station #34 $ 120 4 $ 480 Police Station $ 120 4 $ 480 . Municipal Pool $ 120 4 $ 480 Morgan and Kimball Towers $ 120 4 $ 480 City Hall $ 120 4 $ 480 Tradesman Shop $ 120 4 $ 480 Sub total $ 3,840 Additional Services (estimated from prior year) Unit Price Estimated annual charge Hazardous waste removal subcontractor rate +15% $20,000 Asbestos sampling and remediation subcontractor rate +15% $20,000 Environmental project management $120/hour $10,000 Sub total $ 50,000 Grand total $ 75,080 Conclusion Rely Environmental provides environmental compliance solutions for businesses in Southern California. We currently solve environmental compliance challenges for eight public agencies in San Diego County, most of them have been clients for more than a dozen years. These municipalities face challenges that are very similar to the ones National City currently faces. We have an excellent reputation and relationship with local regulators and leverage this relationship Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relvenvironmental.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 7 of 8 150 of 473 for your benefit. We are certain that we can provide National City with an excellent compliance management solution. Rely Environmental 3276 Rosecrans Street, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92110 www.relvenvironmental.com Phone: 844-992-RELY Fax: 619-374-7133 Page 8 of 8 151 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 152 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the Squad Program as a permanent emergency service delivery model for the National City Fire Department. (Fire) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 152 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the Squad Program as a permanent emergency service delivery model for the National City Fire Department. (Fire) PREPARED BY: Frank Parra DEPARTMENT: PHONE: 619-336-4551 APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: See Staff Report. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: APPROVED: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report 2. Resolution 153 of 473 CALIFORNJA -- NATIONAL Cif INCORYORJAIILD SQUAD PILOT PROGRAM - UPDATE 1/22/2019 PURPOSE This Staff Report reviews the one year Squad Pilot Program with the goal of continuing as a permanent enhanced service delivery model for the residents of National City. BACKGROUND In 2009, the City of National City retained the services of Citygate Associates, LLC to conduct a Fire Service Standards of Response Coverage Deployment Study. This comprehensive study provided several recommendations for emergency service delivery improvements. One of the primary findings of this study identified a coverage gap in the northeast section of our city. The Citygate study recommended adding a 3rd Fire Station to this affected area. Per Resolution No. 2016-145, the City Council authorized the development and implementation of a 1-year Squad Pilot Program designed to enhance public safety and the efficiency of the National City Fire Department. The Squad Pilot Program consisted of a medium duty response vehicle housed under a metal garage structure with mobile home trailer next to city -owned El Toyon Park Recreation Center within the northeast section of National City. The unit was staffed twenty four hours a day, seven days a week, by a two person crew. The unit was designed to provide advanced life support, limited fire suppression, incident command, and ancillary support functions during larger emergencies. The primary mission of the Squad was to provide an enhanced response capability to aid the residents of National City. The Squad was solely dedicated to National City and was not available for auto -aid responses into other jurisdictions. On October 10, 2017, the City placed in service a Squad operating out of a leased mobile home trailer as part of the Squad Pilot Program. This was in an effort to improve response times and emergency services to residents in this area of the city. ANALYSIS From October 10, 2016 to October 9, 2017, our average response times without the Squad for emergencies to the affected neighborhoods in the northeast section of the city were 4 minutes 51 seconds. From October 10, 2017 to October 9, 2018, our average response times with the Squad for emergencies to the affected neighborhoods in the northeast section of the city were 3 minutes 15 seconds. These times are a significant reduction of 96 seconds and clearly demonstrates that the coverage gap previously identified by the 2009 Citygate Study has been closed (See Table 1). 154 of 473 Table 1 National City Fire Department Average Response Time Comparison with/without Squad 33 Call Category FIRE RESCUE EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONSE URGENT MEDICAL RESPONSE NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONSE HAZARD Overall National City Fire Department without Squad - Trucks and Engines Only Oct 10, 2016 - Oct 9, 2017 Number of Responses 51 5 Average Response Time 0:06:14 0:03:16 1189 99 120 66 3 0:04:47 0:05:24 0:03:47 0:04:24 0:07:40 National City Fire Department with Squadil - Squad, Trucks and Engines Oct 10, 2017 - Oct 9, 2018 Number of Responses 142 9 1617 173 155 117 16 Average Response Time 0:03:50 0:04:13 0:03:09 0:02:57 0:03:06 0:04:18 0:04:33 1,533 0:04:51 2,229 0:03:15 Note: These average response times do not include a 90 second dispatch and turn out time. In addition, our fire department has also seen reductions in overall response times of 7 seconds for the entire City (See Table 2). This reduction in response times may not seem significant, but when you consider that our fire department responded to 1,045 more emergency calls — it is significant. Table 2 National City Fire Department Average Response Time Comparison with/without Squad 33 Call Category RESCUE EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONSE URGENT MEDICAL RESPONSE NON -EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONSE HAZARD SERVICE Overall National City Fire Department without Squad - Trucks and Engines Only Oct 10, 2016 - Oct 9, 2017 Number of Responses 545 46 5057 540 506 366 39 Average Response Time 0:05:23 0:05:50 0:04:35 0:04:26 0:03:08 0:05:04 0:07:22 7,099 0:04:41 National City Fire Department with Squad — Squad, Trucks and Engines Oct 10, 2017 - Oct 9, 2018 Number of Responses 582 72 5806 559 598 470 57 Average Response Time 0:05:11 0:05:05 0:04:30 0:04:15 0:03:37 0:04:56 0:04:55 8,144 0:04:34 Note: National City Fire Department responded to an additional 1,045 emergency calls. These two factors have proven this service delivery model has shown a noticeable decrease in response times, thereby improving our overall service delivery. Although the Citygate Study called for a 3rd Fire Station in the northeast section of the city, the Squad Pilot Program immediately saves the city approximately 4 to 5 million dollars in construction costs. This action will continue to show National City residents that the City Council is committed to fiscal responsibility and the prudent use of its tax dollars while improving public safety. 2 155 of 473 GOALS OF THE SQUAD PILOT PROGRAM Enhance service delivery to the residents of National City - Decrease response times to the northeastern section of our city by 90 seconds Decrease overall City response times by 30 seconds Improve cardiac arrest survivability rates by decreasing patient down time prior to initiation of life saving interventions Maintain and enhance public satisfaction with the service delivery of our Fire Department Improve NCFD efficiency - Increase minimum daily staffing from 11 to 13 firefighters Provide 13 National City firefighters on first alarm responses in National City Reduce mileage on more expensive department engines and trucks by 20% during Squad Pilot Program Lower fuel and maintenance costs for department engines and trucks FISCAL IMPACT Estimated costs for the Squad Pilot Program included the temporary promotions of three Fire Engineers to the rank of Fire Captain and three Firefighters to the rank of Fire Engineer was $37,646. In addition, maintaining daily staffing at a minimum of 13 personnel per day, inclusive of overtime was estimated to cost $112,354. (NOTE: the estimated overtime was based on the fire depaituient being fully staffed with 39 personnel). Unfortunately, the fire department lost two firefighters to other fire departments prior to the start of the Squad Pilot Program. The two vacancies were not included in the initial squad -related OT estimate. Therefore, the fire department only had 37 personnel instead of 39 during the Squad Pilot Program. Operating with 37 personnel increased the need to backfill on overtime to maintain daily staffing at 13 personnel. As a result, two out of every three shifts required at least one person to be called in on overtime to cover the vacant position. At times, two or more persons were required to be called in on overtime to cover regular vacation, sick leave, and/or injury leave. Using TeleStaff, the fire department went through each day since the start of the Squad Pilot Program (Oct. 10, 2017-Oct. 9, 2018) to determine when calling in personnel on overtime was necessary to maintain staffing levels at 13 personnel. EDEN was used to find the overtime rate that was paid to those personnel on overtime. Medicare and Worker's Compensation were also added to the overtime rate. In only considering the overtime impact for the vacancies (i.e. overtime for a person to be called in to cover the vacant spot on the roster), the overtime cost was $339,904.95. The total cost of overtime to maintain daily staffing at 13 personnel (i.e. overtime for a person to be called in to cover the vacant spot on the roster, regular vacation, sick leave, and/or injury leave) during the one year period was $645,213.30. Although the total overtime cost may seem way over the initial estimate of $112,354, the two firefighter vacancies equate to a cost savings in yearly wages and benefits of approximately $225,072.84. As a result, the total cost of overtime during the Squad Pilot Program (i.e. $645,213.30), offset by the savings from the two vacant firefighter positions (i.e. $225,072.84) results in an impact of approximately $420,140.46. 3 156 of 473 As previously presented, the Squad will result in the following one-time and ongoing costs: One-time Costs Mobile home trailer (used) purchase, General Fund — $49,680 plus applicable California sales taxes (applicable only if program is extended beyond pilot year) Ongoing Costs (General Fund) • Mobile home facility (used) operating lease - $26,400 • Facility maintenance and utilities' — $4,800 • Fuel and maintenance costs (vehicle)' — $1,5002 1 Via internal service charges 2 These costs are expected to be offset by lower fuel and maintenance costs of larger trucks and engines resulting from reduced use due to the squad program. As outlined above, should the City Council approve this pilot program, funding would come primarily from the General Fund. The costs of the Squad Program currently are not budgeted. Therefore, costs incurred for the program require new appropriations. Unless financed with debt or grant funds, new appropriations for the current fiscal year would require the use of available fund balance or reserves. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution authorizing staff to make permanent the Squad Program. 4 157 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 158 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City to waive the bid process pursuant to NCMC 2.60.220(B) for the sole source purchase of 24 sets of turnout gear from Allstar Fire Equipment in the amount of $61,000.59 for the purchase for the National City Fire Department. (Fire) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 158 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO.: ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City to waive the bid process pursuant to NCMC 2.60.220(B) for the sole source purchase of 24 sets of turnout gear from Allstar Fire Equipment in the amount of $61,000.59 for the purchase for the National City Fire Department. (Fire) PREPARED BY: Frank Parra, Director of Emergency Services DEPARTMENT: Building and Fire PHONE: 619-336-4551 APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: The Fire Department recommends that the City purchase 24 sets of turnout gear from Allstar Fire Equipment. It is requested that the City Council waive the formal bidding requirements as allowed in National City Municipal Code Section 2.60.220(B) because the commodity can only be obtained from one source. The total cost for the turnout gear is $61,000.59. Staff recommends waiving the formal bidding requirements toward the purchase of the 24 sets of turnout gear from Allstar Fire Equipment. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: APPROVED: FINANCE ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: MIS 001-412-125-318-0000 (Wearing Apparel) - $61,000.59 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION FINAL ADOPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Sole Source — Allstar Fire Equipment 2. Quote — Allstar Fire Equipment 3. Resolution 159 of 473 OLION Re: LION Authorized and Approved Distributor To Whom It May Concern: Allstar Fire Equipment Inc. and LION have experienced a decades' -long partnership in proudly supplying the California fire service with the highest quality personal protective equipment. LION is grateful to the high energy and enthusiasm exhibited by the staff at Allstar Fire Equipment. Their dedication to the highest standards of service and integrity has developed into their position as the sole source for LION's NFPA 1971 compliant LION® brand turnouts to the municipal fire service market in California. Allstar Fire Equipment operates two facilities: one in Hayward, California along with their headquarters in Arcadia, California. Allstar maintains a significant inventory and professional sales staff covering the entire state. LION provides state-of-the-art ergonomics in its Janesville® V-Force® turnouts and true innovations such as Isodri®, Semper DriTM, Lite-N-DriTM and Ventilated TrimTM, responding to the needs of the fire service, with focus on metabolic stress reduction, durability, mobility and comfort. Thank you for your consideration in choosing Allstar Fire Equipment and LION for your personal protection requirements. Best regards, MichelleTrout Michelle Trout Regional Sales Manager 7200 Poe Ave. I Suite 400 I Dayton, OH 45414 tf: 800.548.6614 I p: 937.898.1949 I f: 937.898.2848 info@lionprotects.com I www.lionprotects.com 160 of 473 ALLSTAR FIRE EQUIPMENT, INC SALES QUOTE 12328 Lower Azusa Road Arcadia, California 91006 Phone: (626) 652-0900 Fax: (626) 652-0919 Date: October 26, 2018 To: National City FD Attn: Matt Lucas Fax: Per your request, we are pleased to quote on the following: QTY 25 24 1 25 UNIT ea pr pr pr DESCRIPTION Lion Model CVBM-K7 Natural 6 oz. PBI Max V-Force Turnout Coat per National City FD Specs Lion Model PVFM-K7 Natural 6 oz. PBI Max Belted V-Force Turnout Pant per National City FD Specs Lion/Janesville PSDM-T7 Natural PBI GEMINI Super Deluxe Turnout Pants per Cal Fire MVU Specs Lion Model SR344L - "H" Back Red/Blue Suspenders with Leather Tabs Terms: Net 30 FOB: Destination Delivery: 60 Days Note: Pricing is valid for 30 days. Subject to change thereafter. Any non stock or special order items may be non returnable and/or subject to a restocking fee. PRICE $1,386.95 $856.75 $856.75 Included EXTENSION Subtotal 8.75% Quoted By: TOTAL John Sprengelmeyer - inside Sales $34,673.75 $20,562.00 $856.75 Included $56,092.50 $4,908.09 $61,000,59 161 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 162 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City for 1) authorizing a new agreement between the City Of National City and Meyers Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, a Professional Law Corporation for legal services in the specialized area of labor law not to exceed the dollar amount of $100,000 of which $37,000 will cover services incurred in 2018, 2) approving an increase of $60,000 to the General Fund Non-Depaitinental Professional Services appropriation and use of General Fund fund balance. (Human Resouces) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 162 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City for 1) authorizing a new agreement between the City Of National City and Meyers Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, a Professional Law Corporation for legal services in the specialized area of labor law not to exceed the dollar amount of $100,000 of which $37,000 will cover services incurred in 2018, 2) approving an increase of $60,000 to the General Fund Non -Departmental Professional Services appropriation and use of General Fund fund balance. PREPARED BY: Irene Mosley DEPARTMENT: Human Resources PHONE: 336-4308 APPROVED BY: /' EXPLANATION: The City of National City engages outside legal support for some specialized areas. Since August, 2009, Meyers Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, a Professional Law Corporation has served as the City's subject matter expert in the area of labor law. In February 2018, the City entered into an agreement with Meyers Nava Professional Law Corporation to provide support to the City Council, City Manager and staff in performing such functions as the full range of services related to the negotiation, drafting and implementation of agreements with employee labor associations and proactively advising on current legal trends and issues related to labor negotiations and agreements. The Meyers Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson firm has been instrumental in providing support to the City through the labor negotiation process with its three formal labor groups. A labor agreement was with reached with one of the City's three labor groups while two are still pending. The new agreement is needed to allow the firm to assist City staff in completing that process with the remaining labor groups and cover services incurred in excess of the previous 2018 agreement with Meyers Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: APPROVED: Finance MIS This appropriation requires the use of General Fund unassigned fund balance of $60,000. Approval of this request will increase the fiscal -year-to-date authorized use of General Fund unassigned fund balance from $4,255,969 to $4,315,969 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, is not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution authorizing 1) authorizing a new agreement between the City of National City and Meyers Nave, Riback, Silver & Wilson, a Professional Law Corporation for legal services in the specialized area of labor law not to exceed the dollar amount of $100,000 of which $37,000 will cover services incurred in 2018, 2) approving an increase of $60,000 to the General Fund Non -Departmental Professional Services appropriation and use of General Fund fund balance. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: NA ATTACHMENTS: Agreement 163 of 473 AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND MEYERS NAVE RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON, PLC THIS AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made on the PI 22nd day of January, 20198 between THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, a municipal corporation, (the "CITY") and MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON, a professional law corporation, (the "FIRM"). This Agreement sets forth the parties' mutual understanding concerning legal services to be provided by the FIRM and the fee arrangement for said services. RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY entered into a legal services agreement with FIRM on February 12, 2018 ("2018 Agreement"). WHEREAS, Article 3.C. of the 2018 Agreement provided that payment to FIRM shall not exceed $50,000. WHEREAS, labor negotiations proceeded longer than anticipated causing FIRM to render legal services that exceeded the not -to -exceed amount by $37,839. WHEREAS, the CITY wishes to allocate compensation under this Agreement to pay FIRM the $37,839 for past services rendered under the 2018 Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: Article 1. Retainer. The CITY hereby retains the FIRM to assist the CITY by providing as -needed, general legal services regarding municipal law matters. Article 2. Scope of Services. The CITY shall have the right in its sole discretion to determine the particular services to be performed by the FIRM under this Agreement. These services may include the following: perform the full range of services related to the negotiation, drafting and implementation of an MOU, including proactively advising on current legal trends and issues related to labor negotiations and agreements. Specific responsibilities include, but are not limited to: 1. Representing the City as Lead Negotiator in City negotiations with the safety employee labor groups. 2. Advising the City on structuring and conducting labor negotiations with the miscellaneous and safety employee labor groups. General Legal Services Agreement Page 1 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nay 164 of 473 3. Drafting terms of the MOUs to ensure clarity and fairness to the City. 4. Advising the City on legal issues related to the interpretation and application of the terms of the MOUs. 5. Recommending innovative methods for reaching agreement with labor unions in challenging economic times. 6. Advising the City on all aspects of labor relations, including but not limited to the City's bargaining obligations, unfair labor practice charges, new developments in labor law, interpretation and application of City's memoranda of understanding, policies, procedures and rules and drafting revisions to same, and advising the City on the development or revision of policies in a manner consistent with current labor trends and labor law. 7. Meeting with and providing reports to various City of National City representatives including City Council, City Manager, Director of Administrative Services and the City Attorney's Office. 8. Working closely with the City Attorney's Office and the Human Resources Department regarding all aspects of representation. This agreement retains the legal services of Meyers Nave and recognizes that various attorneys and/or paralegals may be assigned to work on the CITY's matters. However, it is understood and agreed that Edward L. Kreisberg, a Principal of the FIRM shall be the principal in charge of representing the CITY's interests and shall attend all meetings with labor groups, the City Manager, and the City Council where the services of the CITY's Chief Labor Negotiator are required unless otherwise agreed to in advance by the CITY. as follows: Article 3. Compensation. Compensation paid under this Agreement shall be Principal $350/hour Senior Of Counsel/Senior Associate $325/hour Of Counsel/Associate $300/hour Paralegal $180/hour A. The FIRM shall not use more than one attorney for the same specific task without the CITY's approval. The FIRM may use the minimum number of attorneys for this engagement consistent with good professional practice after consulting with and obtaining approval by the CITY. B. The FIRM agrees to document a plan and budget consistent with the scope of services described above in Article 2 to be agreed to by the City Attorney and the FIRM. The CITY shall not be obligated to pay the FIRM amounts not discussed, budgeted, and agreed to before being incurred by the FIRM. General Legal Services Agreement Page 2 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nay 165 of 473 C. The CITY has appropriated or otherwise duly authorized the payment of an amount not to exceed $1050,000_ for legal services and out-of-pocket disbursements pursuant to this Agreement. In no event shall the total fees plus out-of-pocket disbursements exceed this amount without written authorization of the CITY. (1) Given that recent labor negotiations proceeded longer than anticipated, FIRM rendered legal services that exceeded the 2018 Agreement's not -to - exceed amount by $37,839. The CITY hereby allocates $37,839 of compensation under this Agreement to pay FIRM the for past services rendered under the 2018 Agreement. D. The FIRM shall keep the CITY advised monthly as to the level of attorney hours and client services performed under Article 1. The FIRM will not charge the CITY for travel time; however, the FIRM may charge for work performed for the CITY during any travel time. E. The CITY further agrees to reimburse the FIRM, in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Article, for telephone, fax, mail, messengers, federal express deliveries, document reproduction, client -requested clerical overtime, lodging, and similar out- of-pocket expenses charged by the FIRM as a standard practice to its clients generally. In any billing for disbursements, the FIRM shall provide the CITY with a statement breaking down the amounts by category of expense. The following items shall not be reimbursed, unless the CITY has specifically agreed otherwise: (1) Word Processing, clerical or secretarial charges, whether expressed as a dollar disbursement or time charge. (2) Storage of open or closed files, rent, electricity, local telephone, postage, receipts or transmission of telecopier documents, or any other items traditionally associated with overhead. (3) Photocopy charges in excess of $.15 (fifteen cents) per page. (4) Auto mileage rates in excess of the rate approved by the Internal Revenue Service for income tax purposes. (5) Secretarial overtime. Where case requirements demand overtime, the CITY will consider reimbursement on a case -by -case basis. The CITY will not reimburse overtime incurred for the convenience of the FIRM's failure to meet deadlines known in advance. or like items. (6) Equipment, books, periodicals, research materials, Westlaw/Lexis (7) Express charges, overnight mail charges, messenger services or the like, without the CITY's prior consent. The CITY expects these expenses to be incurred in emergency situations only. Where case necessity requires the use of these services, the CITY will consider reimbursement on a case -by -case basis. (9) Late payment charge and/or interest. Due to the nature of the CITY's payment process, the CITY will not pay any late charges or interest charges to bills. General Legal Services Agreement Page 3 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nav 166 of 473 Every effort will be made to pay bills promptly. F. Bills from the FIRM should be submitted to Stacey Stevenson, Deputy City Manager, 140 E. 12th Street, Suite A National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950- 4301. The individual time and disbursement records customarily maintained by the FIRM for billing evaluation and review purposes shall be made available to the CITY in support of bills rendered by the FIRM. G. The FIRM agrees to forward to the CITY a statement of account for each one -month period of services under this Agreement, and the CITY agrees to compensate the FIRM on this basis. The FIRM will consult monthly with the CITY as to the number of attorney hours and client disbursements which have been incurred to date under this Agreement, and as to future expected levels of hours and disbursements. H. Billing Format. Each billing entry must be complete, discrete and appropriate. (1) Complete. (a) Each entry must name the person or persons involved. For instance, telephone calls must include the names of all participants. (b) The date the work was performed must be included. (c) The hours should be billed in .10 hour increments. (d) The specific task performed should be described, and the related work product should be reference ("telephone call re: trial brief," "interview in preparation for deposition"). (e) The biller's professional capacity (partner, associate, paralegal, etc.) should be included (2) Discrete: Each task must be set out as a discrete billing entry; neither narrative nor block billing is acceptable. (3) Appropriate (a) The CITY does not pay for clerical support, administrative costs, overhead costs, outside expenses or excessive expenses. For example, the CITY will not pay for secretarial time, word processing time, air conditioning, rental of equipment, including computers, meals served at meetings, postage, online research, or the overhead costs of sending or receiving faxes. Neither will the CITY pay for outside expenses such as messenger delivery fees, outside photocopying, videotaping of depositions, investigative services, outside computer litigation support services, or overnight mail without prior written approval from the CITY. (b) Due to the nature of the CITY's payment process, the CITY will not pay any late charges. Every effort will be made to pay bills promptly. I. Staffing. Every legal matter should have a primarily responsible attorney and a paralegal assigned. Staffing is a CITY decision, and the CITY's representative may review staffing to insure that it is optimal to achieve the goals of the engagement at the least cost. General Legal Services Agreement Page 4 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nay 167 of 473 (1) Paralegals are to be used to the maximum extent possible to enhance efficiency and cost-effectiveness. (2) Once an attorney is given primary responsibility for an engagement, that person should continue on the legal matter until the matter is concluded or the attorney leaves the FIRM. The CITY will not pay the costs of bringing a new attorney up to speed. (3) If more than one attorney is going to perform the same task, prior approval from the CITY must be had. This includes document review. Article 4. Independent Contractor. The FIRM shall perform services as an independent contractor. It is understood that this contract is for unique professional services. Accordingly, the duties specified in this Agreement may not be assigned or delegated by the FIRM without prior written consent of the CITY. Retention of the FIRM is based on the particular professional expertise of the individuals rendering the services required in the Scope of Services. Article 5. Confidentiality of Work. All work performed by the FIRM including but not limited to all drafts, data, correspondence, proposals, reports, and estimates compiled or composed by the FIRM pursuant to this Agreement is for the sole use of the CITY. All such work product shall be confidential and not released to any third party without the prior written consent of the CITY. Article 6. Compliance with Controlling Law. The FIRM shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, regulations, and policies of the federal, state, and local governments as they pertain to this Agreement. In addition, the FIRM shall comply immediately with any and all directives issued by the CITY or its authorized representatives under authority of any laws statutes, ordinances, rules, or regulations. The laws of the State of California shall govern and control the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Article 7. Acceptability of Work. The CITY shall decide any and all questions which may arise as to the quality or acceptability of the services performed and the manner of performance, the acceptable completion of this Agreement and the amount of compensation due. In the event the FIRM and the CITY cannot agree to the quality or acceptability of the work, the manner of performance and/or the compensation payable to the FIRM in this Agreement, the CITY or the FIRM shall give to the other written notice. Within ten (10) business days, the FIRM and the CITY shall each prepare a report which supports their position and file the same with the other party. The CITY shall, with reasonable diligence, determine the quality or acceptability of the work, the manner of performance and the compensation payable to the FIRM. General Legal Services Agreement Page 5 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nav 168 of 473 Article 8. Indemnification. The FIRM agrees to defend, indemnify and hold the CITY and its agents, officers, employees, and volunteers harmless from and against all claims asserted or liability established for damages or injuries to any person or property, including injury to the FIRM's employees, agents, officers, or volunteers which arise from or are caused by the acts or omissions of the FIRM and its agents, officers, or employees in performing the work or other obligations under this Agreement, and all expenses of defending against same; provided, however, that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the established sole negligence or willful misconduct of the CITY, its agents, officers, employees, or volunteers. The indemnity, defense, and hold harmless obligations contained herein shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any alleged or actual omission, act, or negligence under this Agreement that occurred during the term of this Agreement. Article 9. Insurance. The FIRM shall not commence work under this Agreement until it has obtained all insurance required in this Article with a company or companies acceptable to the CITY. At its sole cost and expense, the FIRM shall take and maintain in full force and effect at all times during the term of this Agreement the following policies of insurance: A. Commercial general liability insurance with a combined single limit of not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, and not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate. The policy shall name the CITY and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds, and a separate additional insured endorsement shall be provided. B. For all of the FIRM's employees which are subject to this Agreement, to the extent required by the State of California, Workers' Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law. C. Errors and omissions insurance in an amount not less than two million dollars ($2,000,000) per claim or occurrence and not less than four million dollars ($4,000,000) aggregate. If this coverage is provided on a claims -made basis: (1) The Retroactive Date must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement or the beginning of the services provided under this Agreement. (2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the Agreement. (3) If coverage is canceled or non -renewed, and not replaced with another claims -made policy form with a Retroactive Date prior to the effective date of the Agreement, the FIRM must purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of services performed under this Agreement. General Legal Services Agreement Page 6 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nav 169 of 473 D. Automobile liability, in the form of "any auto" coverage, in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. The policy shall name the CITY and its officers, agents, employees, and volunteers as additional insureds, and a separate additional insured endorsement shall be provided. E. All insurance required by express provision of this Agreement shall be carried only with insurance companies that have a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII (unless otherwise agreed to by the CITY's Risk Manager) or a company of equal financial stability that is approved by the CITY'S Risk Manager, and is authorized to conduct business in the State of California. In the event coverage is provided by non -admitted "surplus lines" carriers, they must be included on the most recent List of Approved Surplus Line Insurers ("LASLI") and otherwise meet rating requirements. (1) All policies shall contain language, to the extent obtainable, to the effect that: (a) the insurer waives the right of subrogation against the CITY and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, representatives, and volunteers; (b) the policies are primary and not contributing with any insurance that may be carried by the CITY; (c) the policies cannot be cancelled or materially changed except after thirty (30) days' notice by the insurer to the CITY's Risk Manager, at the address listed in subsection G below the CITY by certified mail. (d) Before this Agreement shall take effect, the FIRM shall furnish the CITY's Risk Manager with copies of all such policies upon receipt of them, or a certificate evidencing such insurance. The FIRM may effect for its own account insurance not required under this Agreement. F. If the FIRM maintains broader coverage or higher limits (or both) maintained by the FIRM, the CITY required and shall be entitled to the broader coverage or higher limits (or both) maintained by the FIRM. Any available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance and coverage shall be available to the CITY. G. The Certificate Holder for all policies of insurance required by this Section shall be: City of National City c/o Risk Manager 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-4397 General Legal Services Agreement Page 7 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nav 170 of 473 H. This Agreement shall not take effect until certificate(s) or other sufficient proof that these insurance provisions have been complied with, are filed with and approved by the CITY' S Risk Manager. If the FIRM does not keep all of such insurance policies in full force and effect at all times during the terms of this Agreement, the CITY may elect to treat the failure to maintain the requisite insurance as a breach of this Agreement and terminate the Agreement as provided herein. I. All deductibles and self -insured retentions in excess of $10,000 must be disclosed to and approved by the CITY. CITY reserves the right to modify the insurance requirements of this Section 9, including limits, based on the nature of the risk, prior experience, insurer, coverage, or other special circumstances. Article 10. Drug Free Work Place. The FIRM agrees to comply with the CITY's Drug -Free Workplace requirements. Every person awarded a contract by the CITY for the provision of services shall certify to the CITY that it will provide a drug -free workplace. Any subcontract entered into by the FIRM pursuant to this Agreement shall contain this provision. Article 11. Non -Discrimination Provisions. The FIRM shall not discriminate against any subcontractor, vendor, employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. The FIRM will take positive action to insure that applicants are employed without regard to their age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. Such action shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The FIRM agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause. Article 12. Effective Date and Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by the FIRM and CITY and continue until written notice of cancellation. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by either party with sixty (60) days' written notice to the other. Notice of termination by the FIRM shall be given to the City Attorney. Article 13. Notification of Change in Form. The FIRM has the right to effect changes in form including but not limited to: the change in form from a partnership to a professional law corporation; the change in form of any partner or partners from an individual or individuals to a professional law corporation; the change in form of any corporate partner or partners to any individual partners. The CITY shall be promptly notified in writing of any change in form. General Legal Services Agreement Page 8 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nav 171 of 473 Article 14. Notices. In all cases where written notice is to be given under this Agreement, service shall be deemed sufficient if said notice is deposited in the United States mail, postage paid. When so given, such notice shall be effective from the date of mailing of the notice. Unless otherwise provided by notice in writing from the respective parties, notice to the Agency shall be addressed to: and to: Stacey Stevenson Deputy City ManagerHuman Resources Director City of National City 140 East12th Street, Suite A National City, CA 91950-43-014397 cc: Angil Morris Jones City Attorney City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-43011397 sst-e-veffsen@natienalcityea,ge-v1munoz@nationalcityca.gov amorrisjones@nationalcityca.gov gmillerattorneyAnationalcityca.gov Notice to the FIRM shall be addressed to: Edward Kreisberg Principal Meyers Nave 555 12th Street, Suite 1500 Oakland, CA 94607 and to: eddie@meyersnave.com Nothing contained in this Agreement shall preclude or render inoperative service or such notice in the manner provided by law. Article 15. Headings. All article headings are for convenience only and shall not affect the construction or interpretation of this Agreement. Article 16. Miscellaneous Provisions. A. Time of Essence: Time is of the essence for each provision of this Agreement. B. California Law: This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California. The FIRM covenants and agrees to submit General Legal Services Agreement Page 9 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nay 172 of 473 to the personal jurisdiction of any state court in the State of California for any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or related to this Agreement. C. Integrated Agreement: This Agreement including attachments and/or exhibits contains all of the agreements of the parties and all prior negotiations and agreements are merged in this Agreement. This Agreement cannot be amended or modified except by written agreement, and mutually agreed upon by the CITY and the FIRM. D. Severability: The unenforceability, invalidity, or illegality of any provision of this Agreement shall not render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid, or illegal. E. Waiver: The failure of the CITY to enforce a particular condition or provision of this Agreement shall not constitute a waiver of that condition or provision or its enforceability. F. Conflict of Interest: During the term of this Agreement, the FIRM shall not perform services of any kind for any person or entity whose interests conflict in any way with those of the CITY. This prohibition shall not preclude the CITY from expressly agreeing to a waiver of a potential conflict of interest under certain circumstances. G. No Obligations to Third Parties: Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon, or obligate any of the parties hereto, to any person or entity other than the parties hereto. H. Construction: The parties acknowledge and agree that (i) each party is of equal bargaining strength, (ii) each party has actively participated in the drafting, preparation and negotiation of this Agreement, and (iii) any rule or construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement, or any portions hereof, or any amendments hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement is executed by CITY and by FIRM on the date and year first above written. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY By: Leslie Deese, City ManagerAleiandra Sotelo-Solis, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Angil P. Morris -Jones MEYERS NAVE RIBACK, SILVER & WILSON, A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION By: Gina Roccanova, LEG Group Leader By: Edward Kreisberg, Principal General Legal Services Agreement Page 10 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nav 173 of 473 By Roberto M. Contreras Deputy City AttorneyAPPROVED AS TO FORM: By Angil P. Morris Jones City Attorney General Legal Services Agreement Page 11 of 11 City of National City and Meyers Nav 174 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 175 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Temporary Use Permit — Inflatable Event hosted by Fun Inflatable Slides at Westfield Plaza Bonita Mall from March 1, 2019 thru August 25, 2019 with no waiver of fees. (Neighborhood Services) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 175 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Temporary Use Permit — Inflatable Event hosted by Fun Inflatable Slides at Westfield Plaza Bonita Mall from March 1, 2019 thru August 25, 2019 with no waiver of fees. PREPARED BY: Dionisia Trejo DEPARTMENT: Neig PHONE: (619) 336-4255 APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: This is a request from Fun Inflatable Slides to hold Inflatable Event at 3030 Plaza Bonita Road from March 1, 2019 thru August 25, 2019. This outdoor inflatable amusement park will feature slides, obstacle courses and bouncers for child entertainment surrounded by temporary fencing for perimeter safety and carpet for flooring. ces Department This park is open to the public and paid admission grants unlimited play time for the entire day with in and out privileges. No activities outside the fenced perimeter are set up. Days of operations will be Monday thru Sunday 9 a.m. — 7 p.m. Note: This application has been approved for this request in 2017 and 2018 with no waiver of fees. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: APPROVED: Finance MIS City fee of $272.00 for processing the TUP through various City departments, plus $600.00 for the Fire Permits Total Fees: $872.00 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: N/A ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval with no waiver of fees or in accordance to City Council Policy 802. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: Application for a Temporary Use Permit with recommended conditions of approval. 176 of 473 1 f+' . .1 '.„ City of National City N. Neighborhood Services Department 1243 National City Boulevard ■ National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4384 fax (619) 336-4217 www.nationalcityca.gov 3 pe of Event ❑ Fair/Festival ° 0 Parade/ 0 TI,1P E Ev{ant Title arch 0I Sporting Event ent Name & Location Event Locatfon (list all sites being requested) EIMEME Se: -Up Starts Da:e . Z _1e,• l7 (—Lent Starts Da:e / Event Ent Breakdown Ends Da.e ?i0 Time Time The Time plicantt Information Applicant (Your name) Event Coordinator (if different from applicant) Ma ling Address 9,0 3 l- l nIkylv Da!' Phone kto ' P 4' After I -ours Phone Public Information Phone eon., 0-,..35-piE-mail ❑ Walk or Run ❑ Concert/Performance PIS Other (specify) ( 61-4,41 a 3o PI42d Coma& rya • 5kin 204;- Day of Week b0 Day of Week Day of Week Day of Week Applicant agrees to investigate, defer from and against any and a!f loss, (Inc uding attomey`s fees) and causes may incur, sustain or.be subjected to badly injury to or death of any perso invitees of each party hereto) arising o City premises under this agreement to RECEIVED NOV 2 9 2018 • hleightiorhncd Services Ge;aH- n i1 City of National Cd ins ng Organization , k-5-1v 1tiC , lote. St f . t QIA n cat c )L/V352/ Fax , indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, employees and agents arnage, liability, claims, demands, detriments, 'costs, charges, expense f action of any character which the City, its officers, employees and agents n account of loss or damage to property or the loss of use thereof and for s (indiuding but not limited to the employees, ,subcontractors, agents and t of or In any way connected to the occupancy, enjoyment and use of any e extent permitted by few. Applicant understands this TUP/special event may Implicate fees for City services, which will have to be paid In the C€ty's Finance Department 48 hours prir to the event set-up. The undersigned also understands and accepts the City's refund policy for application proc:ssing and facility use and that fees and charges are adjusted annually and are subject to change. Sig iature'of Applicant: Date '- 1 177 of 473 Special Event Application (continued) Please complete the following sections with as much detail as possible since fees and requirements are based on the information you provide us. Fees!Proceeds/Reportin Is your organization a "Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? Yes ❑ No Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? Yes` 1 No ❑I If YES, please explain the purpose and provide amount (s): $ event. Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this Estimated Expenses for this event. $ What is the projected amount of revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive as a result of this event? ]esdiptionyotEver t. ❑ First time event ❑ Returning Event ❑ include site map with application Note that this description may be published in our City Public Special Events Calendar: n a ' i f tianated Attendance; Anticipated # of Participants: J Anticipated # of Spectators: ofa 7 178 of 473 Traffic Control, Securit , First Aid and Accessibilit Requesting to close street(s) to vehicular traffic? Yes ❑ No List any streets requiring closure as a result of the event (provide map): Date and time of street closure: Date and time of street reopening: ❑ Other (explain) Requesting to post "no parking" notices? Yes 1V No El ❑ Requested "No Parking" on city streets and/or parking Tots (list streets/parking lots) (provide map): _3/L Oia/aelktS eJ(2 Ee, Aiw ❑ Other (explain) Security and Crowd Control Depending on the number of participants, your event may require Police services. Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Security:. • a 2d-1-- fi'b.ai?`-) `%' , e���� ete— ^ eC' � Have you hired Professional Security to handle security arrangements for this event? Yes ❑ N If YES, name and address of Security Organization Security Director (Name): Phone: If using the services of a professional security firm AND the event will occur on City property, please provide a copy of its insurance certificate, evidencing liability with limits of at least $1 Million dollars per occurarice/$2 Million dollars aggregate, as well as and additional insured endorsement naming the City of National City, its officers, employees, and agents as additional insureds. Evidence of insurance must be provided by the vendor or its insurer to the City's Risk Manager for review and approval prior to the event. Is this a night event? Yes ❑ N be illuminated to ensure safety of the p icipants and spectators: If YES, please state how the event and surrounding area will 3 179 of 473 First Aid Depending on the number of participants, your event may require specific First Aid services. First aid station to be staffed by event staff? Y ❑ First aid/CPR certified? Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ First aid station to be staffed by professional company. ► Company Accessibilit Please describe your Accessibility Plan for access at your event by individuals with disabilities: 71:60-e _ ja/X-eke'tp 42.0&2_),- a4e 4-# 67 „ezx /1.1 A11/2/i /Ve't4.-/` Elements of our Event Setting up a stage? Yes ❑ Ncri* ❑ Requesting City's PA system 0 Requesting City Stage; if yes, which size? 0 Dimensions (13x28) ❑ Dimensions (20x28) ❑ Applicant providing own stage ► (Dimensions) Setting up canopies or tents? # of canopies size # of tents size ❑ No canopies/tents being set up Setting up tables and chairs? ❑ Furnished by Applicant or Contractor (q(-) # of tables ❑ No tables being set up 706 # of chairs ❑ No chairs being set up ❑ (For City Use Only) Sponsored Events - Does not apply to co -sponsored events # of tables ❑ No tables being set up # of chairs ❑ Ng ehairs being set up Contractor Name Contractor Contact Information Address City/State Phone Number 4 180 of 473 Setting up other equipment? ❑ Sporting Equipment (explain) Other (explain) Dfv'0, C� ❑ Not setting up any equipment listed above at event LU Having amplified sound and/or music? Ye No ❑ A System for announcements —gip player or DJ music ❑ Live Music ► ❑ Small 4-5 piece live band ► ❑ Large 6+ piece live band ❑ Other (explain) If using live music or a DJ. ► Contractor Name Address City/State Phone Number Using lighting equipment at your event? Yes ❑ N ❑ Bringing in own lighting equipment ❑ Using professional lighting company ► Company Name Address City/State Using electrical power? Yes No ❑ ❑ Using on -site electricity ging in generator(s) ❑ For sound and/or lighting ❑ For sound and/or lighting Phone Number ❑ For food and/or refrigeration ❑ For food and/or refrigeration Vendor Information PLEASE NOTE: You may be required to apply for a temporary health permit if food or beverages are sold of given away during your special event. Also see `Permits and Compliance' on page 8 in the Special Event Guide. For additional information on obtaining a temporary health permit, please contact the County of San Diego Environmental Health at (619) 338-2363. Having food and non-alcoholic beverages at your event? Yes 11--No❑ ❑ Vendors preparing food on -site ► # ► Business License # If yes, please describe how food will be served and/or prepared: If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: ❑ GAS ❑ ELECTRIC ❑ CHARCOAL ❑ OTHER (Specify): Vendors bringing pre -packaged food ► # ► Business License# -Vendors bringing bottled, non-alcoholic beverages (i.e., bottled water, can soda, etc.) ► # ❑ Vendors selling food # ► Business License #(s) i Vendors selling merchandise # ► Business License #(s) 5 181 of 473 7- Food/beverages to be handled by organization; no outside vendors Vendors selling services # ► Business License #(s) ► Explain services ❑ Vendors passing out information only (no business license needed) # ► Explain type(s) of information ❑ No selling or informational vendors at event Having children activities? Yes No❑ PLEASE NOTE: In the event inflatable jumps are provided at the event, The City of National City requires commercial liability insurance with limits of at least $1 Million dollars per occurrence/$2 Million dollars aggregate. In addition, the City of National City must be named as an Additional Insured pursuant to a separate endorsement, which shall be provided by the vendor or its insurer to the City's Risk Manager, along with the Certificate of Insurance, for approval prior to the event. The application should be filed out at least one week prior to the event. There is a $25 fee to process the permit application. For questions or to obtain a copy of the "Facility Use Application", please contact the Engineering/Public Works Department at (619) 336-4580. Hatable bouncer house # IRock climbing wall Height /5 Inflatable bouncer slide # Arts & crafts (i.e., craft making, face painting, etc.) ❑ Other Having fireworks or aerial display? Yes El N ❑ Vendor name and license # Dimensions Duration Number of shells Max. size PLEASE NOTE: In the event fireworks or another aerial display is planned for your event, The City of National City requires commercial liability insurance with limits of at least $2 Million dollars per occurrence/ $4 Million dollars aggregate. In addition, the City of National City must be named as an Additional Insured pursuant to a separate endorsement, which shall be provided by the vendor or its insurer to the City's Risk Manager, along with the Certificate of Insurance, for approval prior to the event. Depending on the size and/or nature of the fireworks display, the City reserves the right to request higher liability limits. The vendor must also obtain a fireworks permit from the National City Fire Department and the cost is $502.00 Arranging for media coverage? Yes❑ N ❑ Yes, but media will not require special set-up ❑ Yes, media will require special set-up. Describe 6 182 of 473 MIE. ..- PLEASE NOTE: For City sponsored or co -sponsored events, banners publicizing the event may be placed on the existing poles on the 1800 block and 3100 block of National City Boulevard. The banners must be made to the City's specifications. Please refer to the City's Special Event Guidebook and Fee Schedule for additional information. Are you planning to have signage at your event? Ye l! . ❑ ❑ Yes, we will post signage # Dimensions Pa_c,T3 . ❑ Yes, having inflatable signage # ❑ Yes, we will have banners # ❑ What will signs/banners say? ► (complete Inflatable Signage Request form) ❑ How will signs/banners be anchored or mounted? Waste Management PLEASE NOTE: One toilet for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there are sufficient facilities in the immediate area available to the public during the event. Are you planning to provide portable restrooms at the event? Yes No ❑ If yes, please identify the following: ► Total number of portable toilets: ► Total number of ADA accessible portable toilets: ❑ Contracting with portable toilet vendor. ► ► Load -in Day & Time Company Phone ► Load -out Day & Time ❑ Portable toilets to be serviced. ► Time 177 Set-up; Breakdown, Clean-up Setting up the day before the event? ❑ Yes, will set up the day before the event. o, set-up will occur on the event day Requesting vehicle access onto the turf? ► # of set-up day(s) ❑ Yes, requesting access onto turf for set-up and breakdown (complete attached Vehicle Access Request form) No, vehicles will load/unload from nearby street or parking lot, 7 183 of 473 NPDES-Litter Fence ❑ City to install litter fence pplicant to install litter fence ...❑1111 N/A Breaking down set-up the day after the event? ❑ Yes, breakdown will be the day after the event. ► # of breakdown day(s) 10 JAY g El No, breakdown will occur on the event day. How are you handling clean-up? ❑ Using City crews sing volunteer clean-up crew during and after event. ❑ Using professional cleaning company during and after event. Miscellaneous Please list anything important about your event not already asked on this application: Please make a copy of this application for your records. We do not provide copies. 8 184 of 473 1 __— CALIFORNIA;�aovf =NC0RPORAT£0 Special Event Information Special Events Pre -Event Storm Water Compliance Checklist Name of Special Event: 9€�Cl=aY/ D�Z�C Event Address: Event Host/Coordinator: Expected # of Attendees: Phone Number: 8057 V,;/,53"01—/ IL Storm Water Best Management Practices (BMPs) Review Y YES NO N/A Will enough trash cans providedforthe event? Provide number of trash bins: / Will enough recycling bins provided for the event? Provide number of recycle bins: / Will all portable toilets have secondary containment trays? (exceptions forADA compliant portable toilets) / Do all storm drains have screens to temporarily protect trash and debris from entering? Are spill cleanup kits readily available at designated spots? / * A Post -Event Storm Water Compliance Checklist will be completed by City Staff. 9 185 of 473 City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. The insurance company issuing the insurance policy must have a A.M. Best's Guide Rating of A:VII and that the insurance company is a California admitted company; if not, then the insurance policy to the issuance of the permit for the event. The Certificate Holder must reflect: City of National City Risk Management Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Organization: e(/%� Person in Charge of Activity; Address: Telephone: O vJ-•7e2/352-/ Date(s) of Use: HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT, As a condition of the issuance of a temporary use permit to conduct its activities on public or private property, the undersigned hereby agree(s) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City and the Parking Authority and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, losses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage, or both, or any litigation and other liability, including attorneys fees and the costs of litigation, arising out of or related to the use of public property or the activity taken under the permit by the permittee or its agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Applican Official Title: Date: For Office Use Only Certificate of Insurance Approved Date 10 186 of 473 Fun Inflatable Slides, LLC is an amusement park with multiple commercial -grade inflatable slides of varying sizes open to the public. The location is the parking lot of Plaza Bonita, located at the northeast corner, accessible via Sweetwater Road. The area will be secured with a perimeter chain -link construction fence, and entrance on the west side and an emergency exit on the east side. The emergency exit will be easily opened from the inside. The surface area will be covered in entirety with a carpeting and or synthetic carpet. There will be 2 portable bathrooms with regular cleaning service as required. The inflatable play areas or slides are made for heavy use and can accommodate children and adults of all sizes. Sizes of the slides will be as long as 35 feet and 35 feet high. The inflatables will be set in a specific designated area as per the diagram attached. Each inflatable is secured to the ground as per instructions and best practice suggestions from the manufacturer. The VIP area will be comprised of 2 independent party areas and a sofa area. The party areas will include 2 plastic portable tables with 20 plastic portable chairs each. The sofa area will have 2 imitation leather sofas. The VIP area will be under a 20 foot by 20 foot tent, which is supported by metal framing and shall be -assembled and -secured to the ground permanufacturer specifications. The generator will be stored in an independently gated area outside of the designated play area. The generator area will be secured via locks and secured area signage. The entrance will have a 10 foot by 10 tent supported with metal framing and shall be assembled and secured to the ground per manufacturer specifications. The entrance will compromise of an area to collect fees for entrance, along with merchandise for sale, snacks and non- alcoholic beverages for sale. Fire extinguishers Color Key Green — carpeting Pink — Inflatables Yellows --Tables White — VIP Tent Blue -principal entrance and emergency exit Black- Restrooms Orange- generator 11 187 of 473 188 of 473 ACORE CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE .--` DATE (MMIDDrYYY) 11/19/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING 1NSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). Mainline Insurance Servic P:O. Box 12D640 Chula Vista CA 91912 COPRODUCER NAME' Ramses Ramses G. Hernandez PHON �A1C0 N . EYq' (88$) 467 6612 (Ali NO(877) 467-6610 E-MAIL ramses@mainline-ins.com INSURER(SI AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC fR INSURER A :Covington Specialty Insurance Company , INSURED FUN INFLATABLE SLIDES 1037 National ave San Diego CA 92113- INSURERS : INSURERC: INSURER D: INSURER E : INSURER F: COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTRUNSID TYPE OF INSURANCE ADM. SUER Mr) POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF POLICY EXP (MMIDDIYYYY) , LIMITS X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X SAMPLE QUOTE ONLY _IMM/DDNYYYI For Quole Only For Quote Only EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 PR DAMAGE SES (Ea occurrence) $ 50,000 CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR MED EXP (Any one parson) $ 5,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 100,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GEN'L X AGGREGATE POLICY , OTHER, LIMITAPPLIES PRO- PER: PRODUCTS-COMP/OPAGG $ 2,000,000 $ AUTOMOBILE — LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED AUTOS ONLY HIRED AUTOS ONLY — SCHEDULED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Fa arrldent) $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ $ UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB — OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ $ DED RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory In NH) If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below YIN N / A PER STATUTE OTH- ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L, DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS 1 LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached If more space Is required) Plaza Bonita LLC, Westfield America, Inc., Westfield America Limited Partnership and Westfield Properly Management LLC are named as additonal insured, as required by written contract. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION Al 013061 Westfield Plaza Bonita 3030 Plaza Bonita Rd Ste 2075 National City CA 91950- SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WELL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) ©1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights r The ACORD name and logo 13 egistered marks of ACORD 189 of 473 ACORb CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE t DATE(MMIDDNYYYY) 11 /19/2018 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Mainline Insurance Servic P.O. Box 120640 Chula Vista CA 91912 CONTACT Ramses G. Hernandez NA MEt PHONE (888) 467-6612 Fax (877) 467-6610 PAL ND, g.q1 EMAIL ramses@mainline-ins.com ADDRESS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURERA :Covington Specialty Insurance Company INSURED FUN INFLATABLE SLIDES 1037 National ave San Diego CA 92113- INSURER B : INSURERC: INSURER D : INSURER E: INSURER F : CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER: VW V L,sn Jl_V THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, IN TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL IMS'b SUER ma. POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF (MMIDDIVYYY) POLICY EXP IP 1IDDIYYYYI LIMITS LTR X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X SAMPLE QUOTE ONLY For Quote Only For Quote Only EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 DAMAGE TO RENTED (Fa occurrence) $ 50,000 CLAIMS -MADE X OCCUR __Q.EFMISFR MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000 PERSONAL &ADV INJURY $ 100,000 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 GEN'L X AGGREGATE POLICY OTHER: LIMIT APPLIES PRO- JECT PER: LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 2,000,000 AUTOMOBILE — LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED — _ SCHEDULED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY FOMBINdEEDeal} SINGLE LIMIT $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE accident) $ _,_(Per UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LAB O OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ $ DED RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY YIN ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNERIEXECUTIVE OFFICERJMEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatary in NH) If yes, describe under H IA PER FORH E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE- EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE -POLICY LIMIT $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS !LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 401, Additional Remarks Sohndale, may be attached if more space Is required) Plaza Bonita LLC, Westfield America, Inc., Westfield America Limited Partnership and Westfield Property Management LLC are named as additonal insured, as required by written contract. di n44r1A4 CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCEL Westfield Plaza Bonita 3030 Plaza Bonita Rd Ste 2075 National City CA 91950- SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) 01988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights The ACORD name and logo 14 egistered marks of ACORD 190 of 473 estiieId November 26, 2018 City of National City Attention: Vianey Rivera Neighborhood Services Division 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950-4301 Re: Temporary Use Permit Fun Inflatables LLC — Westfield Plaza Bonita Dear Ms. Rivera: Westfield Plaza Bonita 3030 Plaza Bonita Road Suite 2075 San Diego, CA 91950 T (619) 267-2850 F (619) 472-5652 I hereby authorize Ruth Medina, acting as representative of Fun Inflatables, LLC, to operator a business known as Fun Inflatables in parking lot #7 at Westfield Plaza Bonita during the dates of March 1, 2019 — August 31, 2019. Ruth Medina has permission to install temporary power to poles in parking lot #7 to provide power during the temporary use time if adequate power is not already in place. Ruth Medina will obtain all necessary permits from National City for occupancy at Westfield Plaza Bonita. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions at 619.267.2850. Sincerel Gen-ral Manager Westfield Plaza Bonita Cc: retailers file 15 191 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONDITIONS SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: Fun Inflatable Slides EVENT: Inflatable Event DATE OF EVENT: March 1, 2019 — August 25, 2019 APPROVALS: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES RISK MANAGER PUBLIC WORKS FINANCE FIRE POLICE CITY ATTORNEY COMMUNITY SERVICES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES YES [ x ] NO [ YES [ x ] NO [ YES [x] NO [ YES [ x ] NO [ YES [ x ] NO [ YES [ x ] NO [ YES [ x ] NO [ YES [x] NO [ YES [ x ] NO [ SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES (619) 336-4318 Building No comments Planning • Any speakers or lights, if used, shall face away from residential areas. • All activities shall comply with the limitations contained in Table III of NCMC Title 12 (Noise) Engineering No comments CITY ATTORNEY Approved on condition that Risk Manager approves. COMMUNITY SERVICES No involvement 16 192 of 473 NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES Neighborhood Notifications — Events are required to notify residents and/or businesses of the surrounding impacted areas by the event. The notice shall include the name of the event, name and phone number of the company/organization producing the event, the dates and times of the event (including set-up and breakdown) and a detailed description of how the residents and/or businesses may be affected, such as by street closures, "No Parking" signs being posted, music at the event, etc. POLICE DEPARTMENT The police department has no stipulations regarding this event. FINANCE Fun Inflatable Slides has a current business license. No further comments. RISK MANAGER (619) 336-4370 Risk Management has reviewed the above captioned application for the issuance of a Temporary Use Permit. In as much as the event will held solely on private property there will be no additional insurance requirements necessary for the issuance of the permit. It should be noted that the Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agreement were properly executed by the applicant at the time the Special Event Application was submitted. PUBLIC WORKS (619)366-4580 No involvement 17 193 of 473 FIRE (619) 336-4550 INSPECTION REQUIRED $200.00 INSPECTION FEE FOR INSPECTIONS OCCURING AFTER HOURS OR ON WEEKENDS OR HOLIDAYS. $400 FEE FOR CANOPIES TOTAL $600 Stipulations required by the Fire Department for this event are as follows: 1) Access to the area to be maintained at all times, entrances and emergency roadways 2) Fire Department access into and through event areas are to be maintained at all times. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not Tess than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 14 feet 3) Fire Hydrants shall not be blocked or obstructed 4) Participants on foot are to move immediately to the sidewalk upon approach of emergency vehicle(s) 5) Vehicles in roadway are to move immediately to the right upon approach of emergency vehicle(s) 5) Vehicles shall be isolated from contact with the tents, canopies or membrane structures. Vehicles shall be at least 20 feet away from tents, canopies and membrane structures 8) Provide a minimum of 2A:10BC fire extinguishers throughout area. Extinguisher to be mounted in a visible location between 3'/2`to 5' from the floor to the top of the extinguisher (See Attached). Maximum travel distance from an extinguisher shall not be more than 75 feet travel distance. A sign describing location of extinguisher (Fire Extinguisher) shall be placed immediately above the fire extinguisher 7) Every room or space, shall have the occupant load of the space posted in a conspicuous place, near the main exit or exit access doorway from the room or space. Posted signs shall be of an approved legible permanent design and shall be maintained by the owner or authorized agent. The maximum occupant load of this space shall be based on room set-up and items placed inside tents or canopies. The maximum occupancy load shall be posted by the Building or 18 194 of 473 Fire Official based on room configuration. At no time shall the owner or agent allow the posted occupant load to be exceeded 8) Exits shall be clearly marked. Exit signs shall be installed at required exit doorways and where otherwise necessary to indicate clearly the direction of egress when the exit serves and occupant of 50 or more. Exits, aisles and passageways shall not be blocked or have their minimum clear width obstructed in any manner 9) The arrangement of aisles shall be subject to approval by the building and fire code official, and shall be maintained clear at all times during occupancy 10) The floor surface and grounds outside shall be kept clear of combustible waste. Such waste shall be stored in approved containers until removed from the premises 11) Smoking shall not be permitted in amusement area. Approved "No Smoking" signs shall be conspicuously posted 12) Internal combustion power sources that may be used for "Emergency Power" shall be of adequate capacity to permit uninterrupted operation during normal operating hours 13) Internal combustion power sources shall be isolated from contact with the public by either physical guards, fencing or an enclosure 14) A drip pan shall be used to capture oils and fuel lost during normal operation 15) Diesel fuel stored, shall be no more than 10 gallons of fuel. Diesel fuel shall be stored no closer than 20 feet from generator 16) Diesel fuel shall be protected from impact of surrounding vehicles and machinery (20 feet). Container holding fuel, shall meet all state and federal guidelines for holding vessel and storage 17) Approved holding vessel (container) shall be labeled (DOT) so as to describe its contents. Label shall be visible to all oncoming emergency personal 18) Diesel fuel container shall have secondary containment to meet code 19) Diesel fuel container shall be bonded and grounded to meet code 20) Dispensing of fuel shall meet code requirements for the correct dispensing of flammable and combustible liquids. Gravity style dispensing apparatus shall not be used 19 195 of 473 21) Provide a 2A:10BC fire extinguisher at entrance to generator. Extinguisher to be mounted in a visible location between 31/2`to 5' from the floor to the top of the extinguisher. Maximum travel distance from an extinguisher shall not be more than 75 feet travel distance 22) Any electrical power used, is to be properly grounded and approved. Extension cords shall be used as "Temporary Wiring" only, and shall be protected so as not to create a tripping hazard to the public. Consult building official for requirements and inspection of possible temporary power/electrical 23) A fire safety inspection is to be conducted by the Fire Department prior to operations of the event 24) Entire air supported structure systems shall be inspected at regular intervals throughout the permit use period, by the permittee, owner or agent to determine that the installation is maintained in accordance with Chapter 34 of the 2013 California Fire Code 25) A fire safety inspection is to be conducted by the Fire Department prior to operations of the event Required inspections taking place, after hours, holidays, and weekends will be assessed a minimum of two hundred ($200.00) dollars. Please contact the National City Fire Department to arrange a time for inspection. Periodic inspections will be conducted by the National City Fire Department for this event 26) Fire Department fees can only be waived by City Council 27) If tents or canopies are used, tents having an area in excess of 200 square feet and or canopies in excess of 400 square feet or multiple tents and or canopies placed together equaling or greater than the above stated areas, are to be used, they shall be flame-retardant treated with an approved State Fire Marshal seal attached. A ten feet separation distance must be maintained between tents and canopies. A permit from the Fire Department must be obtained. Cooking shall not be permitted under tents or canopies unless the tents or canopies meet "State Fire Marshal approval for cooking. Certificate of State Fire Marshal flame resistance shall be provided to the National City Fire Department if applicable. Fees can only be waived by City Council. Canopies: Tents: 0 — 400 sf - $0 401 — 500 sf - $353.00 501 — 600 sf - $394.00 601 — 700 sf - $515.00 20 196 of 473 0 —200 sf - 20 t — (+) sf - $300.00 $600.00 28) A permit for the projected canopies/tents shah be four hundred ($400.00) dollars. Approval Contingent Upon Final Field Inspection and Compliance With All Applicable Codes and Ordinances If you have any questions please feel free to contact me. 21 197 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 198 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Warrant Register #21 for the period of 11/14/18 through 11/20/18 in the amount of $1,955,739.55. (Finance) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 198 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO.: ITEM TITLE: Warrant Register #21 for the period of 11/14/18 through 11/20/18 in the amount of $1,955,739.55. (Finance) PREPARED BY:Karla Apalategui, Accounting Assistant PHONE: 619-336-4572 DEPARTMENT: Finance APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 11/14/18 through 11/20/18. Consistent with Department of Finance's practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000. Vendor Check/Wire Amount Explanation Kimley Horn 339623 Project Professionals Corp 339634 Adminsure Inc 851610 Public Emp Ret System 11142018 105,944.59 70,766.40 96,235.00 239,206.96 Sweetwater Final Design Paradise Creek Park II Project/Eng W/C Acct Replenishment Oct 2018 Service Period 10/09/18 — 10/22/18 FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. Warrant total $1,955,739.55. APPROVED: APPROVED: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION FINAL ADOPTION FINANCE MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ratify warrants totaling $1,955,739.55 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Warrant Register # 21 199 of 473 PAYEE AARBLLC ABIVA FAMILY TRUST 05-12-05 ADDLESON ERNEST J & ELLEN N TRUST ADLER HOWARD TRUST 11-23-99 AGUILERA ANTONIO R & ELODIA 0 ANKUR HOSPITALITY INC B F C-FASHIONWALK LLC BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST BASCO LAMBERTO M & AGNES M TRUST BRIDGE BANK CIO CLARK TRACY C BROCK PAUL R LIVING TRUST 12-2 BROWDER JOSEPH M BROWDER JOSEPH M BYRD BARBARA J CANNON FAMLY TRUST 02-01-93 CARPE DIEM HOSPITALITY L L C CLARK DONALD M COATS LEON SR COMMUNITY YOUTH ATHLETIC CENTER CRIVELLO FAMILY TRUST 08-08-74 CURLAN LTD DNSAINC DAVLS ROGER W JR & NORMELI A A DEMEO FRED INC DOBBIN INTERVIVOS TRUST 10-23 DUCAY SONNY V & ROSARIO T DYE MARIA A D ESTRADA DALAL K ESTRADA JANDIZ FRATERNAL ORDER OF EAGLES AERIAL FUENTECILLA CARMEL F TRUST FUENTECILLA DELIA F FUENTECILLA MERLINA F GENERAL BEAD GLASS PAMELA J AND DAKAN HEATH GONZALES GEORGE R GRAHAM DAVID M HAN ALEX K HARBOR VIEW CONDO PROJECT LLC HATZKILSON GRAEME D HERCE ROLANDO G & GLORIA E REV HG-8TH & ROOSEVELT L L C HOLLMAN MARCOS IANNICCA RICHARD R & VICTORIA JACKEL DONALD TRUST 11-22-89 KABEER INVESTMENTS GROUP INC - -- CALIFORNIA -NATIONAL CITy INCORPOFtATEP WARRANT REGISTER # 21 11/20/2018 DESCRIPTION 555-113-11-00 556-471-28-27 556-332-24-00 556-331-21-00 555-085-05-00 555-042-15-00 556-101-15-00 556-333-17-00 556-471-28-24 555-052-06-00 555-113-05-00 556-212-01-00 556-212-03-00 556-210-27-00 556-332-22-00 555-042-18-00 555-081-14-00 556-471-27-43 555-113-08-00 556-331-04-00 555-082-11-00 555-042-17-00 556-471-27-31 556-471-17-00 555-082-10-00 556-333-15-00 556-471-26-10 556-471-29-13 556-471-27-58 555-114-07-00 556-471-28-01 556-471-29-03 556-471-29-02 556-104-01-00 556-473-16-00 556-471-27-38 556-334-19-00 556-471-27-27 556-493-10-05 556-471-27-13 556-334-21-00 555-054-12-00 556-471-29-32 556-471-27-12 556-472-23-00 555-041-03-00 1040 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801811 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 135-39 8TH ST EAST 41 8TH ST EAST 925-45 HOOVER AVE 510 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 241 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 235 8TH ST EAST 801808 NATIONAL CITY BLV 616 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 25 11TH ST WEST 10 5TH ST 511 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 415 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 127 8TH ST EAST 521 ROOSEVELT AVE 200 8TH ST WEST 801511 NATIONAL CITY BLV 1018 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 619 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 111 9TH ST WEST 540 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801415 NATIONAL CITY BLV 999 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 110 8TH ST WEST 205 8TH ST EAST 801210 NATIONAL CITY BLV 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801610 NATIONAL CITY BLV 21 12TH ST WEST 801701 NATIONAL CITY BLV 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 317 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 827 B AVE 801506 NATIONAL CITY BLV 305 8TH ST EAST 801411 NATIONAL CITY BLV 406 #05 8TH ST EAST 801313 NATIONAL CITY BLV 333 8TH ST EAST 700-12 NATIONAL CITIY BL 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801312 NATIONAL CITY BLV 108 8TH ST EAST 425 ROOSEVELT AVE CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339507 11/20/18 3,936.98 339508 11/20/18 168.84 339509 11/20/18 991.79 339510 11/20/18 3,341.67 339511 11/20/18 2,294.37 339512 11/20/18 2,184.19 339513 11/20/18 5,465.49 339514 11/20/18 3,452.14 339515 11/20/18 168.84 339516 11/20/18 331.76 339517 11/20/18 557.68 339518 11/20/18 168.84 339519 11/20/18 518.29 339520 11/20/18 757.93 339521 11/20/18 264.41 339522 11/20/18 4,925.63 339523 11/20/18 431.50 339524 11/20/18 168.84 339525 11/20/18 892.95 339526 11/20/18 355.89 339527 11/20/18 3,683.01 339528 11/20/18 3,193.57 339529 11/20/18 168.84 339530 11/20/18 3,025.45 339531 11/20/18 1,078.67 339532 11/20/18 1,847.62 339533 11/20/18 168.84 339534 11/20/18 168.84 339535 11/20/18 168.84 339536 11/20/18 1,279.78 339537 11/20/18 168.84 339538 11/20/18 168.84 339539 11/20/18 168.84 339540 11/20/18 1,748.59 339541 11/20/18 557.68 339542 11/20/18 168.84 339543 11/20/18 1,478.58 339544 11/20/18 168.84 339547 11/20/18 16,021.98 339548 11/20/18 168.84 339549 11/20/18 288.64 339550 11/20/18 4,486.70 339551 11/20/18 168.84 339552 11/20/18 168.84 339553 11/20/18 1,979.22 339554 11/20/18 5,045.94 1/4 200 of 473 PAYEE KENNEDY FAMILY TRUST 12-30-96 KOCH ERIC C LAGAZO JAMES AND LAGAZO FAUSTO LIEN HOWARD & NANCY T A LINDELOF LUCILLE M TRUST 09-25 LIU NATHANIEL & LEAH MASTER DC LLC MCBRIDE FAMILY TRUST 05-22-91 MCGRATH CHARLES P MEINTS CARLYLE M TR AND MEINTS MORCOS NASHAAT M S & SAMIA S NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD L L C NATIONAL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NAVARRA MARITAL EXEMPT TRUST 1 NIEDERFRANKS ICE CREAMS OJEDA JUAN OLIVARES ELIAS & MARIA PCAMLLC PACIFICA BAY VIEW LLC PACIFICA HARBOR VIEW ONE L P PATEL DIPAK R PIERCE KATHLEEN D RODRIGUEZ EDNA SANDS ADA P AND LAHTI REVOCABL SARDO LIVING REVOCABLE TRUST 0 SATNAAM HOTELS INC SUPER 8 SCHELLENBERG SARAH J AND NICDA SCHLOTZHAUER FAMILY TRUST 11-1 SCHMIDT ARNOLD & VALERIE REVOC SERRATOS PROPERTIES L L C SESE REDENTOR P & MARIA V J SHAMOO JONATHAN K ST GERMAIN LORRE M AND ST GERM STEWART ELLEN R FAMILY TRUST 2 STRAUSER M DALIA TIBBETT FAMILY TRUST 01-15-02 TIGER TRUST 12-05-02 CIO DOLOR TORRES JUAN & DIGNORA LIVING T UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA N A VOGEL MARC & DEBBIE FAMILY TRUST VARGAS ELADIA B & ENRIQUE WILD ERICH AND YUTSUS GERTRUD WONG YON PON & TERESA WONG YON PON & TERESA XIE YIDONS ZIMAN ALLAN & HELENE B -e CALIFORNIA -NATIONAL CITy rNCORPOFtATEP WARRANT REGISTER # 21 11/20/2018 DESCRIPTION 556-104-18-00 556-471-28-33 556-471-28-11 556-212-06-00 556-334-20-00 556-474-21-00 556-334-22-00 556-332-21-00 556-471-29-37 556-473-15-00 556-471-28-07 555-041-09-00 556-471-16-00 556-210-25-00 556-331-22-00 556-471-27-64 556-104-02-00 555-114-01-00 556-471-26-01 555-053-17-00 555-052-04-00 556-101-01-00 556-471-26-02 555-041-10-00 556-553-04-00 555-052-15-00 556-471-29-05 556-471-28-28 556-553-01-00 555-052-05-00 556-471-28-41 556-471-26-11 556-471-29-17 555-041-07-00 556-471-29-16 555-114-06-00 556-554-21-00 555-030-21-00 556-471-23-00 556-332-23-00 555-085-03-00 555-081-17-00 556-331-05-00 556-331-15-00 556-471-29-04 555-081-10-00 333 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801901 NATIONAL CITY BLV 801711 NATIONAL CITY BLV 515 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 325-27 8TH ST EAST 330-38 8TH ST EAST 345 8TH ST EAST 115-19 8TH ST EAST 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 200-28 8TH ST EAST 801707 NATIONAL CITY BLV 416 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 901 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 423 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 724-26 A AVE 801616 NATIONAL CITY BLV 14 3RD ST EAST 38 11TH ST WEST 801201 NATIONAL CITY BLV 700 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 640 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 205 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801202 NATIONAL CITY BLV 438 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 1017 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 425 ROOSEVELT AVE 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801812 NATIONAL CITY BLV 1001-07 NATIONAL CITY BL 624-32 NATIONAL CITY BLV 801909 NATIONAL CITY BLV 801211 NATIONAL CITY BLV 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 404 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 1133 ROOSEVELT AVE 1145 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 330 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 22 8TH ST EAST 131-33 8TH ST EAST 128 9TH ST WEST 832 HOOVER 623-33 NATIONAL CITY BLV 639 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 801 NATIONAL CITY BLVD 816 HOOVER CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339555 11/20/18 1,280.65 339556 11/20/18 168.84 339557 11/20/18 168.84 339558 11/20/18 886.16 339559 11/20/18 198.62 339560 11/20/18 1,778.39 339561 11/20/18 318.07 339562 11/20/18 376.77 339563 11/20/18 168.84 339564 11/20/18 1,750.69 339565 11/20/18 168.84 339566 11/20/18 360.06 339567 11/20/18 1,115.26 339568 11/20/18 1,169.70 339569 11/20/18 883.14 339570 11/20/18 168.84 339571 11/20/18 168.84 339572 11/20/18 492.55 339575 11/20/18 17,390.52 339576 11/20/18 16,029.52 339577 11/20/18 488.54 339578 11/20/18 1,135.83 339579 11/20/18 168.84 339580 11/20/18 848.60 339581 11/20/18 434.01 339582 11/20/18 1,661.31 339583 11/20/18 168.84 339584 11/20/18 168.84 339585 11/20/18 488.54 339586 11/20/18 457.08 339587 11/20/18 168.84 339588 11/20/18 168.84 339589 11/20/18 168.84 339590 11/20/18 848.60 339591 11/20/18 337.68 339592 11/20/18 459.00 339593 11/20/18 1,103.61 339594 11/20/18 2,563.69 339595 11/20/18 3,398.22 339596 11/20/18 178.47 339597 11/20/18 168.84 339598 11/20/18 1,402.00 339599 11/20/18 831.12 339600 11/20/18 651.64 339601 11/20/18 168.84 339602 11/20/18 187.99 2/4 201 of 473 PAYEE ARCHIBALD SHEET METAL ASSI SECURITY INC AT&T AT&T AZTEC APPLIANCE BLAZENSKI, MICHAEL CALIFORNIA AIR COMPRESSOR CO CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CIRCULATE SAN DIEGO CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH CLF WAREHOUSE INC COX COMMUNICATIONS CWEA SAN DIEGO DANIELS TIRE SERVICE DOKKEN ENGINEERING DURON, C FLORES CLARK, J HAYWARD, DOUGLAS ROBERT HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HUERTA JR. R KIMLEY HORN LEFORTS SMALL ENGINE REPAIR MASON'S SAW MEGLA MANUFACTURING INC MEYERS NAVE MOSSY NISSAN NAN MCKAY AND ASSOCIATES INC NIEBLAS, J ORKIN PARTS AUTHORITY METRO LLC PRO BUILD PROJECT PROFESSIONALS CORP PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY RANDALL LAMB ASSOCIATES INC RELY ENVIRONMENTAL ROADONE SAM'S ALIGNMENT SCST INC SDG&E SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC SLADE, J SMART & FINAL SOUTHERN CALIF TRUCK STOP SPEEDPRESS STC TRAFFIC SUPERIOR READY MIX - -- CALIFORNIA -NATIONAL CITY INCORPOFtATEP WARRANT REGISTER # 21 11/20/2018 DESCRIPTION 8TH ST.BRIDGE GATEWAY SIGN CITY WIDE DOOR SECURITY SERVICES AT&T SBC PHONE SERVICE OCTOBER AT&T SBC PHONE SERVICE NOVEMBER CITY WIDE APPLIANCE PURCHASES FOR FY COORDINATE ANNUAL AUDIT & CAFR AIR FILTER / PW SAFEROUTE TO SCHOOL PROJECT ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROJECT SD BAY WATERSHED FY2019 MOP 80331 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW COX DATA VIDEO SERVICES NOVEMBER WASTEWATER COLLECTIONS WORKSHOP / PW TIRES FOR CITY FLEET FOR FY 2019 PLAZA BLVD. PROJECT EDUCATION REIMBURSEMENT REIMB / SUPPLIES FOR STATE OF THE CITY A REFUND FOR OVERPAID BUSINESS TAX, ACCT 1 FENCING MATERIAL / PW SAFETY APPAREL REIMBURSEMENT / HUERTA SWEETWATER FINAL DESIGN MOP 80702 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW MOP 45729 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES - PW FABRICATION, WELDING, ASSEMBLY ANGLE LABOR RELATIONS & NEGOTIATIONS SERVICES PARTS - BRACKET, CLIP, LOCKED TRUNK REGISTRATION FEE FOR HCV FINANCIAL MGMT LIABILITY CLAIM COST PEST CONTROL SERVICES MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW MOP 45707. SUPPLIES FOR FACILITIES PARADISE CREEK PARK III PROJECT-ENG MOP 45742 LAUNDRY SVC - PW ENERGY RETROFIT CONTRACTING HAZARDOUS WASTE PICKUP / ENG MOP 75948 ROADSIDE SERVICES - PW WHEEL ALIGNMENT SERVICE FOR CITY CITYWIDE ALLEY IMPROV. SDG&E UTILITIES FOR FACILITIES FY 2019 MOP 69277 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES - PW TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT -ENG MOP #45756/OFFICE SUPPLIES/HR MOP45758 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW FRAME / STREETS FIBER OPTIC TS INTERC. / PW DECOMPOSED GRANITE / PW CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339603 11/20/18 8,896.00 339604 11/20/18 2,810.00 339605 11/20/18 2,240.50 339606 11/20/18 80.23 339607 11/20/18 1,130.30 339608 11/20/18 2,012.50 339609 11/20/18 78.30 339610 11/20/18 29,783.81 339611 11/20/18 8,255.17 339612 11/20/18 16,561.00 339613 11/20/18 76.43 339614 11/20/18 4,949.01 339615 11/20/18 100.00 339616 11/20/18 234.05 339617 11/20/18 3,025.75 339618 11/20/18 165.00 339619 11/20/18 239.20 339620 11/20/18 30.00 339621 11/20/18 546.11 339622 11/20/18 125.00 339623 11/20/18 105,944.59 339624 11/20/18 47.85 339625 11/20/18 14.30 339626 11/20/18 2,055.00 339627 11/20/18 18,945.79 339628 11/20/18 11,102.30 339629 11/20/18 1,485.00 339630 11/20/18 105.60 339631 11/20/18 957.00 339632 11/20/18 115.60 339633 11/20/18 0.53 339634 11/20/18 70,766.40 339635 11/20/18 162.35 339636 11/20/18 6,921.70 339637 11/20/18 3,241.00 339638 11/20/18 40.00 339639 11/20/18 40.00 339640 11/20/18 1,208.75 339641 11/20/18 2,219.11 339642 11/20/18 991.50 339643 11/20/18 107.46 339644 11/20/18 25.54 339645 11/20/18 131.76 339646 11/20/18 271.73 339647 11/20/18 6,170.20 339648 11/20/18 380.72 3/4 202 of 473 PAYEE SWEETWATER AUTHORITY THE STAR NEWS TODD PIPE & SUPPLY LLC UBIQUS REPORTING INC UNITED LABORATORIES INC UNITED ROTARY BRUSH CORP VERIZON WIRELESS WALMART WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY ZAPPIELLO. L WIRED PAYMENTS PAYCHEX BENEFIT TECH INC ADMINSURE INC ARCO BUSINESS SOLUTIONS PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM PAYROLL Pay period Start Date 24 11/6/2018 -e CALIFORNIA NATIONAL CITy INCORPOFtATEP WARRANT REGISTER # 21 11/20/2018 DESCRIPTION WATER SERVICES FOR FACILITIES FY 2019 ADVERTISING NOTICES FOR FY19 CITY WIDE PLUMBING MATERIALS TRANSCRIPTION SVCS - INVEST. INTERVIEW / HR MULBERRY SOAP / PW STREET SWEEPER REPAIRS AND MAINTENANCE VERIZON CELLULAR SERVICES FOR OCTOBER GIFT CARDS FOR STORMWATER CALENDAR MISCELLANEOUS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES / PW MOP #45763/ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES/MIS TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT - ENG BENETRAC ESR SVCS BASE FEE NOV 2018 W/C ACCT REPLENISHMENT OCT 2018 FUEL FOR CITY FLEET OCTOBER 2018 SERVICE PERIOD 10/09/18 - 10/22/18 End Date 11/19/2018 Check Date 11/28/2018 CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339649 11/20/18 1,128.98 339650 11/20/18 994.25 339651 11/20/18 3,503.96 339652 11/20/18 497.00 339653 11/20/18 242.29 339654 11/20/18 943.93 339655 11/20/18 1,032.14 339656 11/20/18 500.00 339657 11/20/18 2,415.07 339658 11/20/18 144.96 339659 11/20/18 188.26 A/P Total 469,370.31 171942 11/16/18 538.65 851610 11/14/18 96,235.00 851661 11/14/18 34,675.81 11142018 11/14/18 239,206.96 1,115,712.82 GRAND TOTAL $1,955,739.55 4/4 203 of 473 Certification IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 37202, 37208, 372059 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE DEMANDS LISTED ABOVE AND TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF AND FURTHER THAT THE ABOVE CLAIMS AND DEMANDS HAVE BEEN AUDITED AS REQUIRED BY LAW. MARK ROBERTS, FINANCE LESLIE DEESE, CITY MANAGER FINANCE COMMITTEE ALEJANDRA SOTELO-SOLIS, MAYOR -CHAIRMAN RONALD J. MORRISON, VICE -MAYOR MONA RIOS, COUNCIL MEMBER JERRY CANO, COUNCIL MEMBER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS WERE APPROVED AND THE CITY TREASURER IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE SAID WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREOF BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2019. AYES NAYS ABSENT 204 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 205 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Warrant Register #22 for the period of 11/21/18 through 11/27/18 in the amount of $305,820.31. (Finance) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 205 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO.: ITEM TITLE: Warrant Register #22 for the period of 11/21/18 through 11/27/18 in the amount of $305,820.31. (Finance) PREPARED BY:Karla Apalategui, Accounting Assistant PHONE: 619-336-4572 DEPARTMENT: Finance APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 11/21/18 through 11/27/18. Consistent with Department of Finance's practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000. Vendor Check/Wire Amount Explanation Exos Community Services 339679 134,406.67 August Professional Services / CSD SDG&E 339707 75,093.09 SDG&E Utilities for Facilites FY19 FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. Warrant total $305,820.31. APPROVED: FINANCE APPROVED: MIS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION FINAL ADOPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ratify warrants totaling $305,820.31 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Warrant Register # 22 206 of 473 PAYEE ANTHONY KIAH BLAZENSKI, MICHAEL THE BIOCLEAN TEAM AIRGAS USA LLC AYDELOTTE, D BASILE CONSTRUCTION INC BOOT WORLD CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY CASTILLO, DANIEL CHRISTENSEN & SPATH LLP CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CLEAR WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC CLF WAREHOUSE INC COUNTYWIDE MECHANICAL CV VENTURES LLC DATA TICKET INC DELGADO, E DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT EXOS COMMUNITY SERVICES LLC EXPRESS PIPE AND SUPPLY FERGUSON ENTERPRISES 1350 FUN EXPRESS LLC GAMWELL, M GRAINGER HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES HUTCHINSON, C IRON MOUNTAIN MENDIVIL, A MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATION NAGLE, D NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL CITY CAR WASH NATIONAL CITY TROPHY NBS PACIFIC AUTO REPAIR PARTS AUTHORITY METRO LLC PRO BUILD PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY QUAL CHEM CORPORATION REEDER, M ROUNDS, R ROUSTON, B SAN DIEGO BEACH RIDES SAN DIEGO FAMILY MAGAZINE LLC SAN DIEGO MIRAMAR COLLEGE -e CALIFORNIA -NATIONAL CITy INCORPOFtATEP WARRANT REGISTER # 22 11/27/2018 DESCRIPTION REFUND C&D DEPOSIT T&A 99380 COORDINATE AUDIT OF FINANCIAL RECORDS EMERGENCY ABATEMENT & REMOVAL / HOUSING MOP 45714 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW TRAINING REIM SLI8 / AYDELOTTE EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIR MOP 64096 SAFETY APPAREL - PW MOP 45698 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW DJ/MC FOR A KIMBALL HOLIDAY / CSD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES- ENG/PW NBS GOVT - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITYWIDE WATER TREATMENT SERVICES MOP 80331 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW HVAC MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FY 2019 DUCK POND FAIR SHARE 2ND QTR. DATA TICKET PARKING ENFORCEMENT CITE - NSD REIMBURSEMENT SUPPLIES FOR KIMBALL HOLIDA'y PORTABLE RESTROOMS / KIMBALL HOLIDAY ENTERPRISE FLEET LEASE AND MAINT-ENG AUGUST PROFESSIONAL SERVICES / CSD CITY WIDE PLUMBING MATERIALS / PW MOP 45723 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW ARTS AND CRAFTS SUPPLIES FOR CAMACHO PARADISE CREEK EDUC. MOP 65179 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW GENERAL SUPPLIES NEEDED FOR BUILDING MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT - ENG RECORD MANAGEMENT AND STORAGE FOR FY19 PARKING REIMBURSEMENT / MENDIVIL MUNICIPAL CODE SUPP 50 UPDATE 2 FY19 TRAINING REIM FTO UPDATE/ NAGLE D MOP 45735 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW CAR WASH SERVICES FOR CITY FLEET FY 2019 MOP 66556 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW NBS - LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT SMOG CERTIFICATION / REPAIRS FOR CITY MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW MOP 45704 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW MOP 69277 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES - PW GRANULAR SEWER LINE MAINTAINER REIMBURSEMENT APA CONFERENCE / REEDER TRAINING ADV LOD LAPD LDERSHP/ROUNDS MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT / PW BOB SLEIGH RENTAL FOR A KIMBALL HOLIDAY MARKETING AD FOR A KIMBALL HOLIDAY TRAINING ACADEMY UNITS/CRUZ CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339660 11/27/18 714.40 339661 11/27/18 2,712.50 339662 11/27/18 9,748.00 339663 11/27/18 228.44 339664 11/27/18 199.99 339665 11/27/18 6,897.65 339666 11/27/18 232.64 339667 11/27/18 345.83 339668 11/27/18 1,500.00 339669 11/27/18 56.25 339670 11/27/18 1,212.67 339671 11/27/18 580.00 339672 11/27/18 418.48 339673 11/27/18 695.00 339674 11/27/18 1,916.10 339675 11/27/18 2,196.17 339676 11/27/18 505.61 339677 11/27/18 480.79 339678 11/27/18 15,247.30 339679 11/27/18 134,406.67 339680 11/27/18 84.39 339681 11/27/18 157.28 339682 11/27/18 200.40 339683 11/27/18 129.99 339684 11/27/18 2,041.62 339685 11/27/18 489.80 339686 11/27/18 21.08 339687 11/27/18 185.40 339688 11/27/18 20.00 339689 11/27/18 266.28 339690 11/27/18 403.83 339691 11/27/18 186.31 339692 11/27/18 515.00 339693 11/27/18 113.48 339694 11/27/18 1,732.47 339695 11/27/18 973.50 339696 11/27/18 150.28 339698 11/27/18 8,256.86 339699 11/27/18 569.36 339700 11/27/18 532.97 339701 11/27/18 55.00 339702 11/27/18 694.14 339703 11/27/18 15.48 339704 11/27/18 850.00 339705 11/27/18 705.00 339706 11/27/18 184.00 1/2 207 of 473 PAYEE SDG&E SDTTC SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC SOUTHERN CALIF TRUCK STOP SPARKLETTS STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE STC TRAFFIC SUPERIOR READY MIX SWEETWATER AUTHORITY T MAN TRAFFIC SUPPLY THE LIGHTHOUSE INC THE STAR NEWS TOPECO PRODUCTS U S BANK UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SPECIALTIES VISTA PAINT WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WESTFLEX INDUSTRIAL WRIGHT, E -e CALIFORNIA NATIONAL CITy INCORPOFtATEP WARRANT REGISTER # 22 11/27/2018 DESCRIPTION SDG&E UTILITIES FOR FACILITIES FY 2019 PROPERTY TAX FOR 420 W 21 ST ST- ENG MOP 69277 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES - PW TOW AWAY NO PARKING SIGNS / PW MOP 45758 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW WATER SERVICE/ OCTOBER 2018 ZEBRA ZT200 SERIES PRINTERS / PD MOP 45704. OFFICE AND EVENT SUPPLIES / CSD HIGHLAND AND E. 28TH ST. COLD MIX ASPHALTS,TACK OIL, 3/8 SHEET WATER SERVICES FOR FACILITIES FY 2019 MOP 76666 TRAFFIC SUPPLIES - PW MOP 45726 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW STAR NEWS - PUBLIC NOTICE MOP 63849 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW US BANK CREDIT CARD SERVICE UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT FOR FY 2019 MOP 46453 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW MOP 68834 PAINT SUPPLIES - NSD MISCELLANEOUS JANITORIAL SUPPLIES MOP 63850 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW REIMBURSEMENT ITEMS FORA KIMBALL HOLIDAY 339729 CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339707 11/27/18 75,093.09 339708 11/27/18 43.92 339709 11/27/18 126.04 339710 11/27/18 3,312.40 339711 11/27/18 113.33 339712 11/27/18 12.00 339714 11/27/18 7,443.53 339715 11/27/18 87.39 339716 11/27/18 3,163.24 339717 11/27/18 190.72 339718 11/27/18 922.66 339719 11/27/18 466.54 339720 11/27/18 15.14 339721 11/27/18 374.12 339722 11/27/18 115.94 339723 11/27/18 3,308.79 339724 11/27/18 366.40 339725 11/27/18 178.28 339726 11/27/18 120.55 339727 11/27/18 2,532.02 339728 11/27/18 142.80 11/27/18 60.00 AJP Total 298,017.31 WIRED PAYMENTS EDD UNEMPLOYMENT INS BENFT JUL THRU SEP 2018 433639 11/23/18 7,803.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 305,820.31 2/2 208 of 473 Certification IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 37202, 37208, 372059 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE DEMANDS LISTED ABOVE AND TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF AND FURTHER THAT THE ABOVE CLAIMS AND DEMANDS HAVE BEEN AUDITED AS REQUIRED BY LAW. MARK ROBERTS, FINANCE LESLIE DEESE, CITY MANAGER FINANCE COMMITTEE ALEJANDRA SOTELO-SOLIS, MAYOR -CHAIRMAN RONALD J. MORRISON, VICE -MAYOR MONA RIOS, COUNCIL MEMBER JERRY CANO, COUNCIL MEMBER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS WERE APPROVED AND THE CITY TREASURER IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE SAID WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREOF BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2019. AYES NAYS ABSENT 209 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 210 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Warrant Register #23 for the period of 11/28/18 through 12/04/18 in the amount of $4,411,033.38. (Finance) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 210 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO.: ITEM TITLE: Warrant Register #23 for the period of 11/28/18 through 12/04/18 in the amount of $4,411,033.38. (Finance) PREPARED BY:Karla Apalategui, Accounting Assistant DEPARTMENT: Finance PHONE: 619-336-4572 EXPLANATION: Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 11/28/18 through 12/04/18. Consistent with Department of Finance's practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000. Vendor Check/Wire Amount Explanation Kaiser Foundation HP 339803 191,105.44 Group 104220-0002 Dec 2018 Kaiser Foundation HP 339804 189,529.92 Group 104220-0002 Nov 2018 City of San Diego 761286 1,337,858.00 Metropolitan Sewerage System Pmt Bank of America 761289 109,983.38 Energy Efficient Series A Bond Pmt Public Emp Ret System 11292018 234,776.16 Service Period 10/23/18 — 11/05/18 APPROVED BY: FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. Warrant total $4,411,033.38. APPROVED: FINANCE APPROVED: MIS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION FINAL ADOPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ratify warrants totaling $4,411,033.38 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Warrant Register # 23 211 of 473 CALIFORNIA ' - PAYEE ACEDO, I ADMINSURE INC ALDEMCO ALDEMCO ALL FRESH PRODUCTS ALL FRESH PRODUCTS ANDERSON, E AT&T AT&T BAVENCOFF JR, D BEARD, P BECK, L BEST BEST & KRIEGER ATTNY LAW BISHOP, R BOEGLER, C BULL, P CAPF CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT CARRILLO, R CASAS, LAURA CEKANDER, L CLAIMS MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES CLEAN HARBORS ENVIRONMENTAL COLE, L COLLINSON, C CONDON, D CORDERO, E CORPUZ, T COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CSULB FOUNDATION CULLIGAN OF SAN DIEGO DALEY & HEFT LLP DALEY & HEFT LLP DALEY & HEFT LLP DALEY & HEFT LLP DALEY & HEFT LLP DANESHFAR, Z DE LAGE LANDEN DELGADO, E DELL MARKETING L P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DESROCHERS, P DI CERCHIO, A DIAZ, M DILLARD, S CITy ancy 1NCORPORATSp WARRANT REGISTER # 23 12/4/2018 DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339730 12/4/18 160.00 W/C CLAIMS ADM MONTHLY - DEC 2018 339731 12/4/18 7,396.66 FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER 339732 12/4/18 7,500.03 FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER 339733 12/4/18 1,720.72 FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER 339734 12/4/18 2,120.46 FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER 339735 12/4/18 206.91 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339736 12/4/18 110.00 AT&T SBC PHONE SERVICE OCT 2018 339737 12/4/18 8,345.65 AT&T SBC PHONE SERVICE NOV 2018 339738 12/4/18 405.08 TRAINING ADV LODG PEER SUPPORT ADV / PD 339739 12/4/18 374.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339740 12/4/18 70.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339741 12/4/18 140.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OCT 2018 339742 12/4/18 1,470.80 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339743 12/4/18 110.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339744 12/4/18 260.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339745 12/4/18 580.00 DECEMBER 2018 - FIRE LTD 339746 12/4/18 931.00 DECEMBER 2018 PD LTD 339747 12/4/18 2,045.75 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339748 12/4/18 290.00 TRANSLATION SERVICES AS NEEDED FOR FY19 339749 12/4/18 100.00 TRAINING ADV LODG GEOPRAPHIC PROF / PD 339750 12/4/18 685.20 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OCT 2018 339751 12/4/18 5,800.00 CONTRACT SERVICES / ENG 339752 12/4/18 1,249.15 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339753 12/4/18 165.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339754 12/4/18 420.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339755 12/4/18 280.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339756 12/4/18 520.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339757 12/4/18 140.00 LICENSING AND PERMITS - NUTRITION 339758 12/4/18 300.00 TRAINING TUITION GEO PROF/CEKANDER/PD 339759 12/4/18 395.00 WATER SOFTNER / NUTRITION 339760 12/4/18 218.00 LIABILITY CLAIM COST NOV 2018 339761 12/4/18 19,301.45 LIABILITY CLAIM COST OCT 31, 2018 339762 12/4/18 3,021.00 LIABILITY CLAIM COST NOV 2018 339763 12/4/18 2,184.58 LIABILITY CLAIM COST NOV 2018 339764 12/4/18 418.00 LIABILITY CLAIM COST NOV 2018 339765 12/4/18 95.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339766 12/4/18 250.00 LEASE 20 SHARP COPIERS 339767 12/4/18 2,939.63 REIMB/PURCHASES FOR KIMBALL HOLIDAY 339768 12/4/18 237.23 ADOBE ETLA CCE CREATIVE CLOUD / MIS 339769 12/4/18 3,247.45 EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT APPS OCT 2018 339770 12/4/18 192.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339771 12/4/18 110.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339772 12/4/18 70.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339773 12/4/18 680.00 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339774 12/4/18 480.00 1/4 212 of 473 CALIFORNIA - AT1ONALCI r 11 CORPORA.T>✓p WARRANT REGISTER # 23 12/4/2018 PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT DREDGE, J RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339775 12/4/18 250.00 DUNBAR ARMORED INC ARMORED SERVICES NOV 2018 - FINANCE 339776 12/4/18 292.10 EISER III, G RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339777 12/4/18 250.00 EPLUS TECHNOLOGY INC RNWL B/U REPLICATION ENT 339778 12/4/18 9,900.00 ETZLER, J RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339780 12/4/18 460.00 FABINSKI, D RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339781 12/4/18 220.00 FB PROUCCIONES SINGING SVCS / STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS 339782 12/4/18 200.00 FEDEX FEDEX PRIORITY OVERNIGHT - COMM SVCS 339783 12/4/18 22.60 FERNANDEZ, R RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339784 12/4/18 270.00 FIFIELD, K RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339785 12/4/18 540.00 FITNESS DIRECT SERVICE DONE ON TREADMILL 339786 12/4/18 89.95 GAUT, A LICENSE REIMBURSEMENT 339787 12/4/18 115.00 GELSKEY, K RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339788 12/4/18 115.00 GIBBS JR, R RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339789 12/4/18 120.00 GONZALES, M RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339790 12/4/18 480.00 HANSON, E RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339791 12/4/18 135.00 HARLAN, M RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339792 12/4/18 500.00 HAUG, S RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339793 12/4/18 120.00 HDL COREN & CONE CONTRACT PROPERTY TAX OCT - DEC 2018 339794 12/4/18 2,814.24 HERNANDEZ, R RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339795 12/4/18 400.00 HODGES, B RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339796 12/4/18 200.00 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES DECORATING SUPPLIES / KIMBALL HOLIDAY 339797 12/4/18 192.72 IBARRA, J RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339798 12/4/18 780.00 IDEMIA IDENTITY & SECURITY USA FINGERPRINT SUBMISSIONS OCT 2018 339799 12/4/18 18.00 JAMES, R RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339800 12/4/18 140.00 JEREMIAH JIMENO PHOTOGRAPHY / STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS 339801 12/4/18 300.00 JUNIEL, R RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339802 12/4/18 50.00 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS GROUP 104220-0002 DEC 2018 339803 12/4/18 191,105.44 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS GROUP 104220-0002 NOV 2018 339804 12/4/18 189,529.92 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS DEDUCTIONS 339805 12/4/18 3,979.10 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS GROUP 104220-05 DEC 2018 339806 12/4/18 3,528.46 KIMBLE, R RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339807 12/4/18 300.00 KLOS, K RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339808 12/4/18 480.00 LA VISTA HISTORICAL FOUNDATION LIGHT TOWERS / STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS 339809 12/4/18 650.00 LANDA, A RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339810 12/4/18 155.00 LASER SAVER INC MOP 45725. INK CARTRIDGES / MIS 339811 12/4/18 1,201.84 LEACH, D RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339812 12/4/18 600.00 LIMFUECO, M RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339813 12/4/18 160.00 LOPEZ, T TRANSLATION SERVICES AS NEEDED FOR FY19 339814 12/4/18 160.00 MACHADO, R TRIANING LE EXECUTIVE / MACHADO / PD 339815 12/4/18 614.58 MARKETING IDEAS CALIFORNIA INC WRISTBANDS FOR A KIMBALL HOLIDAY / CSD 339816 12/4/18 249.98 MATIENZO, M RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339817 12/4/18 100.00 MC CABE, T RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339818 12/4/18 280.00 MCCARTHY, T FLOWERS / STATE OF THE CITY ADDRESS 339819 12/4/18 1,159.56 MCDANIEL, P RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 339820 12/4/18 290.00 2/4 213 of 473 CALIFORNIA ' - PAYEE MEDINA, R MENDOZA, G MINER, D MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC MY LITTLE CARNIVAL NATIONAL CREDIT REPORTING NOTEWARE, D NOWDOCS INTERNATIONAL INC OLIVARES, G PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES PAUU JR, P PEASE JR, D PETERS, S POST, R PRO BUILD PRO -EDGE KNIFE PRO -EDGE KNIFE PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS INC PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY RAY, S ROARK, L RUIZ, J SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO ICE MACHINES COMPANY SAN DIEGO SPORTS MEDICINE SANCHEZ, L SEAPORT MEAT COMPANY SEAPORT MEAT COMPANY SERVATIUS, J SHORT, C SMART & FINAL SMITH, J SPARKLETTS STARTECH COMPUTERS STEWART, W STRASEN, W SUN BADGE COMPANY INC SUPER BIRTHDAY INC SWEETWATER BOYS BASKETBALL SYSCO SAN DIEGO INC SYSCO SAN DIEGO INC THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON THE BUBBLE ROLLERS CITy ancy 1NCORPORATSp WARRANT REGISTER # 23 12/4/2018 DESCRIPTION RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 MOBILE RADIOS- ENG GONDOLA FERRIS WHEEL - COMMUNITY SVCS PAY FOR SEC 8 BACKGROUND & CREDIT REPORT RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 GREEN VOID BOTTOM CHECKS / FINANCE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - NUTRITION JANITORIAL SUPPLIES - NUTRITION RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 MOP 45707 MISC TOOLS - FIRE KNIFE SHARPENING SVCS - NUTRITION KNIFE SHARPENING - NUTRITION THERMAL PAPER 80MM / FINANCE MOP 45742 UNIFORM SVC - NUTRITION MOP 45742 UNIFORM SVCS - NUTRITION RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITIES - NUTRITION TONS OF SNOW FOR A KIMBALL HOLIDAY WELLNESS EXAMS / FIRE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 MOP 45756 OFFICE SUPPLIES - HR RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 WATER - NUTRITION CENTER MOP 61744 COMPUTER SUPPLIES - MIS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 SLIMLINE SUNTONE SILTONE BADGE MINI EXPRESS TRAIN / KIMBALL HOLIDAY PARTICIPATION SERVICE / STATE OF THE CITY FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER FOOD - NUTRITION CENTER CUSTODIAN FEE 11/03/18 TO 11/02/19 SYNTHETIC ICE RINK - KIMBALL HOLIDAY CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339821 12/4/18 105.00 339822 12/4/18 290.00 339823 12/4/18 580.00 339824 12/4/18 27,729.91 339825 12/4/18 4,690.00 339826 12/4/18 278.80 339827 12/4/18 120.00 339828 12/4/18 365.40 339829 12/4/18 280.00 339830 12/4/18 1,127.42 339831 12/4/18 371.10 339832 12/4/18 340.00 339833 12/4/18 140.00 339834 12/4/18 290.00 339835 12/4/18 280.00 339836 12/4/18 103.41 339837 12/4/18 46.00 339838 12/4/18 46.00 339839 12/4/18 167.25 339840 12/4/18 440.73 339841 12/4/18 143.32 339842 12/4/18 190.00 339843 12/4/18 135.00 339844 12/4/18 310.00 339845 12/4/18 153.28 339846 12/4/18 6,949.88 339847 12/4/18 6,518.43 339848 12/4/18 330.00 339849 12/4/18 1,037.74 339850 12/4/18 209.18 339851 12/4/18 340.00 339852 12/4/18 300.00 339853 12/4/18 23.19 339854 12/4/18 320.00 339855 12/4/18 7.17 339857 12/4/18 3,741.21 339858 12/4/18 200.00 339859 12/4/18 135.00 339860 12/4/18 148.57 339861 12/4/18 1,750.00 339862 12/4/18 250.00 339863 12/4/18 7,374.50 339864 12/4/18 3,569.84 339865 12/4/18 1,350.00 339866 12/4/18 12,800.00 3/4 214 of 473 CALIFORNIA ' - PAYEE THE COUNSELING TEAM INTERNATIO TIPTON, B T'S & SIGNS U S BANK U S HEALTHWORKS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE VERIZON WIRELESS VERRY, L VILLAGOMEZ, J VIORA, B WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WHITE, J WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY BETANCOURT, RODOLFO WIRED PAYMENTS CITY OF SAN DIEGO BANK OF AMERICA BANK OF AMERICA PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM SECTION 8 HAPS PAYROLL Pay period Start Date 25 11 /20/2019 TIONL, ancy 1NCORPORATSp WARRANT REGISTER # 23 12/4/2018 DESCRIPTION TRAINING TUITION ADV PEER / BAVENCOFF / PD RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 MARKETING BANNERS - COMM SVCS CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / FIRE PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL & X-RAY / HR MAILING SERVICES / POLICE VERIZON CELLULAR SERVICES FOR FY19 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT JANITORIAL SUPPLIES / FIRE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFITS DEC 2018 MOP 45763 ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES - MIS LIVE ENTERTAINMENT - STATE OF THE CITY METROPOLITAN SEWERAGE SYSTEM PMT ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERIES A BOND PMT ENERGY EFFICIENCY SERIES B BOND PMT SERVICE PERIOD 10/23/18 - 11/05/18 Start Date End Date 11/28/2018 12/4/2018 End Date Check Date 12/3/2018 12/12/2018 GRAND TOTAL CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339867 12/4/18 199.00 339868 12/4/18 250.00 339869 12/4/18 1,002.68 339870 12/4/18 2,411.73 339871 12/4/18 865.00 339872 12/4/18 19.25 339873 12/4/18 11, 079.88 339874 12/4/18 280.00 339875 12/4/18 480.00 339876 12/4/18 127.00 339877 12/4/18 1,098.64 339878 12/4/18 230.00 339879 12/4/18 224.35 339880 12/4/18 300.00 A/P Total 595,899.10 761286 11/29/18 1,337,858.00 761289 11/29/18 109,983.38 761292 11/29/18 43,470.00 11292018 11/29/18 234,776.16 959,532.70 1,129,514.04 $ 4,411,033.38 4/4 215 of 473 Certification IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 37202, 37208, 372059 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE DEMANDS LISTED ABOVE AND TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF AND FURTHER THAT THE ABOVE CLAIMS AND DEMANDS HAVE BEEN AUDITED AS REQUIRED BY LAW. MARK ROBERTS, FINANCE LESLIE DEESE, CITY MANAGER FINANCE COMMITTEE ALEJANDRA SOTELO-SOLIS, MAYOR -CHAIRMAN RONALD J. MORRISON, VICE -MAYOR MONA RIOS, COUNCIL MEMBER JERRY CANO, COUNCIL MEMBER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS WERE APPROVED AND THE CITY TREASURER IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE SAID WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREOF BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2019. AYES NAYS ABSENT 216 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 217 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Warrant Register #24 for the period of 12/05/18 through 12/11/18 in the amount of $1,328,774.64. (Finance) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 217 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO.: ITEM TITLE: Warrant Register #24 for the period of 12/05/18 through 12/11/18 in the amount of $1,328,774.64. (Finance) PREPARED BY:Karla Apalategui, Accounting Assistant PHONE: 619-336-4572 DEPARTMENT: Finance APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 12/05/18 through 12/11/18. Consistent with Department of Finance's practice, listed below are all payments above $50,000. Vendor Check/Wire Amount Ameresco Inc 339887 794,784.63 Explanation Energy Service June 2018 ARJIS 339888 81,114.00 ARJIS ESUN Services / PD Eagle Paving Company 339913 50,617.54 Citywide Pedestrian Midblock FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. Warrant total $1,328,774.64. APPROVED: FINANCE APPROVED: MIS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION FINAL ADOPTION STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Ratify warrants totaling $1,328,774.64 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: Warrant Register # 24 218 of 473 CALIFORNIA+�__ PAYEE ACCI ROOFING SERVICES ACE UNIFORMS & ACCESSORIES INC AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT AIRGAS USA LLC AMEDEE, W AMERESCO INC ARJIS ARMORED MOBILITY INC AT&T ATS PROCESSING SERVICE BOOT WORLD CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF CODE CANON SOLUTIONS AMERICA INC. CARR, D CELLEBRITE USA INC CIRCULATE SAN DIEGO CLAIMS RESOURCE SERVICES COX COMMUNICATIONS CSA SAN DIEGO COUNTY CYNTHIA TITGEN CONSULTING INC DATA TICKET INC DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS DELL MARKETING L P DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE CO DELTA DENTAL INSURANCE CO DEPT OF JUSTICE DIXIELINE LUMBER CO DURAN, D EAGLE PAVING COMPANY INC EISER III, G ENTERPRISE FLEET MANAGEMENT EPIC LAND SOLUTIONS INC ESGIL CORPORATION EXPERIAN FARINGHY, A FEDEX FIRE ETC GOVCONNECTION INC GRAINGER HEALTH NET HEALTH NET HEALTH NET INC NATIONAL CI?? ?ATCORPQRAT8D . WARRANT REGISTER # 24 12/11/2018 DESCRIPTION POLICE DEPT. ROOF REPLACEMENT PRACTICAL FLEECE PULLOVER - NSD EMPLOYEE ASSIST PROGRAM DEC 2018 APCDFEES POLICE DEPT MOP 45714 SAFETY APPAREL - PW REIMBURSEMENT: MILEAGE ENERGY SERVICES JUNE 2018 ARJIS ESUN SERVICES / PD MOBILE ARMORED SHIELD / PD AT&T SBC PHONE SERVICE OCT 2018 REFUND DISMISSED CIT NA020005593 MOP 64096 SAFETY APPAREL - PW CACEO MEMBERSHIP SORIANO - NSD MAINTENANCE SERV. NOVEMBER 2018 RETIREE MED REIMB OCT NOV DEC 2018 FY19 SERVICE / PD INTRA-CONNECT /ENG LIABILITY CLAIM COST COX DATA VIDEO SERVICES DEC 2018 REIMBURSEMENT CDBG AGREEMENT/ HED WIC CONSULTING NOVEMBER 2018 DATA TICKET PARKING ENF - OCT 2018 QUARTERLY USAGE FEE OPTIPLEX 7060 WORKSTATIONS NOV 2018 GRP 05-0908600000 DEC 2018 GRP 05-0908600000 NOV 2018 - GRP 05-0908601002 DEC 2018 GRP 05-7029600000 NOV 2018 GRP 05-7029600000 FINGERPRINTING / POLICE ART PROJECT AT KIMBALL PARK EDUCATIONAL REIMBURSEMENT CITYWIDE PEDESTRIAN MIDBLOCK GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES ENTERPRISE FLEET LEASE AND MAINT - ENG APPRAISAL, FIRE STATION: HOUSING PLAN CHECKS / BUILDING DEPT CREDIT CHECKS / POLICE REIMB DIRECT DEPOSIT / ACCOUNT CLOSED MAILING SERVICES / ENG HELMETS / FIRE DEPT SAMSUNG FULL LED-LCD SMART MOP 65179 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW GRP N7176F NOVEMBER 2018 GRP N7176F DECEMBER 2018 GRP 57135A NOVEMBER 2018 CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339881 12/11/18 7,889.00 339882 12/11/18 105.57 339883 12/11/18 1,088.32 339884 12/11/18 760.00 339885 12/11/18 461.94 339886 12/11/18 23.98 339887 12/11/18 794,784.63 339888 12/11/18 81,114.00 339889 12/11/18 9,274.40 339890 12/11/18 2,291.80 339891 12/11/18 80.00 339892 12/11/18 117.43 339893 12/11/18 190.00 339894 12/11/18 50.00 339895 12/11/18 2,168.48 339896 12/11/18 6,845.00 339897 12/11/18 7,730.39 339898 12/11/18 4,541.18 339899 12/11/18 615.60 339900 12/11/18 12,724.28 339901 12/11/18 2,530.00 339902 12/11/18 2,172.72 339903 12/11/18 4,698.00 339904 12/11/18 10,403.64 339905 12/11/18 15,376.18 339906 12/11/18 15,375.24 339907 12/11/18 135.66 339908 12/11/18 2,882.88 339909 12/11/18 2,827.44 339910 12/11/18 490.00 339911 12/11/18 274.69 339912 12/11/18 1,947.00 339913 12/11/18 50,617.54 339914 12/11/18 1,560.00 339915 12/11/18 15,247.30 339916 12/11/18 3,500.00 339917 12/11/18 29,671.67 339918 12/11/18 80.10 339919 12/11/18 100.00 339920 12/11/18 29.25 339921 12/11/18 334.95 339922 12/11/18 1,013.35 339923 12/11/18 556.00 339924 12/11/18 1,522.34 339925 12/11/18 1,522.34 339926 12/11/18 4,770.16 1/3 219 of 473 CALIFORNIAF__ PAYEE HEALTH NET INC INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLANS LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES LASER SAVER INC LEFORTS SMALL ENGINE REPAIR MCDOUGAL LOVE ECKIS MCDOUGAL LOVE ECKIS MES CALIFORNIA METRO WASTEWATER JPA MURRAY, DYLAN J NAHRO NAN MCKAY AND ASSOCIATES INC NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL CITY TROPHY NATIONAL CREDIT REPORTING NERI LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PACIFIC TELEMANAGEMENT SERVICE PALOMAR HEALTH PARTS AUTHORITY METRO LLC PIERSON, D POWER PLUS POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC PRO BUILD PROJECT PROFESSIONALS CORP PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY RODRIGUEZ, MARITZA S D COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT S D COUNTY VECTOR CNTRL PROGRAM SAN DIEGO COUNTY ASSESSOR SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO PET SUPPLY SAN DIEGO SPORTS MEDICINE SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC SMART & FINAL SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC SMART SOURCE OF CALIFORNIA LLC SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES SOUTHERN CALIF TRUCK STOP STAPLES BUSINESS ADVANTAGE STARTECH COMPUTERS NATIONAL CI?? ?ATCORPQRAT813 . WARRANT REGISTER # 24 12/11/2018 DESCRIPTION GRP 57135A DECEMBER 2018 ITE MEMBERSHIP 2019 / ENGINEERING GRP 104220-01,06, 07 DEC 2018 GRP 104220-01, 06, 07 NOV 2018 GRP 104220-03, 09 DEC 2018 GRP 104220-03, 09 NOV 2018 GRP 104220-7002 NOV 2018 INTERPRETATION SERVICES / POLICE MOP 45725 / SEC 8 PRINTER SUPPLIES MOP 80702 / AUTO SUPPLIES - PW LIABILITY CLAIM COST LIABILITY CLAIM COST FIRE HOSE / FIRE JPA ANNUAL BUDGET FY2019 REFUND OVER PAYMT CIT NC200824050 NAHRO ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES 01/01/19 HCV MASTER REVISION SVC ON CD MOP 45735 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW MOP 66556 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW BACKGROUND CREDIT REPORT / S8 PARADISE CREEK PARK PACIFIC TELEMGT SVCS - DEC 2018 SART EXAM / POLICE MOP 75943 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW REIMB PIERSON CAR RENTAL PARADISE CREEK PARK PUMPS MOP 67839 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW MOP 45704 GENERAL SUPPLIES - PW PARADISE CREEK PARK III MOP 45742 LAUNDRY SERVICES - PW REFUND OVERPMT CIT NA030004400 RANGE TRAINING MOSQUITO & VECTOR CONTROL CNTY BLDG RECORDS/ HOUSING GAS & ELECTRIC UTILITIES- NUTRITION MOP SD PET SUPPLY PD WELLNESS EXAMS LGL NOTICE UNION TRIBUNE: HOUSING MOP 69277 LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES - PW MOP SMART FINAL PD MOP 63845: OFFICE SUPPLIES MOP 63845. APRONS/NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL HOME TBRA PROGRAM: HOUSING MOP 45758 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW MOP 45704 COPY PAPER - HR MOP 61744 COMP ACCESSORIES - MIS CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339927 12/11/18 4,770.08 339928 12/11/18 310.00 339929 12/11/18 22,029.10 339930 12/11/18 22,029.10 339931 12/11/18 4,609.52 339932 12/11/18 4,609.52 339933 12/11/18 1,670.13 339934 12/11/18 72.38 339935 12/11/18 114.13 339936 12/11/18 172.04 339937 12/11/18 3,097.15 339938 12/11/18 437.50 339939 12/11/18 22,513.95 339940 12/11/18 28,514.72 339941 12/11/18 35.00 339942 12/11/18 1,580.80 339943 12/11/18 224.00 339944 12/11/18 175.05 339945 12/11/18 118.54 339946 12/11/18 672.10 339947 12/11/18 16,262.00 339948 12/11/18 78.00 339949 12/11/18 1,350.00 339950 12/11/18 18.99 339951 12/11/18 334.43 339952 12/11/18 710.00 339953 12/11/18 917.50 339954 12/11/18 2,398.15 339955 12/11/18 21,337.35 339956 12/11/18 115.56 339957 12/11/18 110.00 339958 12/11/18 200.00 339959 12/11/18 63.44 339960 12/11/18 39.19 339961 12/11/18 1,557.47 339962 12/11/18 445.39 339963 12/11/18 6,172.12 339964 12/11/18 1,337.04 339965 12/11/18 119.07 339966 12/11/18 268.72 339967 12/11/18 110.93 339968 12/11/18 158.35 339969 12/11/18 28,670.79 339970 12/11/18 300.34 339971 12/11/18 162.33 339972 12/11/18 3,455.25 2/3 220 of 473 CALIFORNIAF__ PAYEE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA SWAGIT PRODUCTION LLC SWEETWATER AUTHORITY SYMBOLARTS, LLC T MOBILE USA INC THE FILIPINO PRESS INC THE STAR NEWS TSC GROUP INC U S BANK U S BANK U S HEALTHWORKS ULINE VCA MAIN ST ANIMAL HOSPITAL VERIZON WIRELESS VWR WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY WEST PAYMENT CENTER WETMORES WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY YBARRA, A YOUNG, G NATIONAL CI?? ?ATCORPQRAT813 . WARRANT REGISTER # 24 12/11/2018 DESCRIPTION STATE BAR MEMBERSHIP DUES VIDEO STREAMING SERVICES OCT 2018 302 W. 19TH ST. WATER SERVICE K9 BADGES / POLICE POLICE SEARCH WARRANT 180-1566 NOTICE OF MEASURE - TAGALOG FY19 ADVERTISING NOTICES FOR FY19 LEASE STATION #33 BANK OF AMERICA MOP CC PD CREDIT CARD EXPENSES / CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS P&E SUPPLIES / PD K9 VET CARE / PD VERIZON CELLULAR SVCS NOV 2018 P&E SUPPLIES / PD JANITORIAL SUPPLIES / PW INVESTIGATIONS TOOL / PD MOP 80333 AUTO SUPPLIES - PW MOP 45763 ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES - MIS TRAINING ADV SUB POST SLI 5/A / PD REIMB SUPPLIES PURCHASE / PD CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 339973 12/11/18 1,149.00 339974 12/11/18 1,920.83 339975 12/11/18 211.77 339976 12/11/18 1,100.00 339977 12/11/18 408.00 339978 12/11/18 200.00 339979 12/11/18 312.63 339980 12/11/18 2,533.06 339981 12/11/18 2,342.12 339982 12/11/18 1,151.46 339983 12/11/18 1,001.00 339984 12/11/18 5,532.34 339985 12/11/18 1,422.32 339986 12/11/18 205.53 339987 12/11/18 47.74 339988 12/11/18 334.23 339989 12/11/18 1,157.35 339990 12/11/18 43.30 339991 12/11/18 214.73 339992 12/11/18 384.00 339993 12/11/18 161.56 A/P Total 1,328,774.64 GRAND TOTAL $1,328,774.64 3/3 221 of 473 Certification IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 37202, 37208, 372059 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE DEMANDS LISTED ABOVE AND TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF AND FURTHER THAT THE ABOVE CLAIMS AND DEMANDS HAVE BEEN AUDITED AS REQUIRED BY LAW. MARK ROBERTS, FINANCE LESLIE DEESE, CITY MANAGER FINANCE COMMITTEE ALEJANDRA SOTELO-SOLIS, MAYOR -CHAIRMAN RONALD J. MORRISON, VICE -MAYOR MONA RIOS, COUNCIL MEMBER JERRY CANO, COUNCIL MEMBER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS WERE APPROVED AND THE CITY TREASURER IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE SAID WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREOF BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 22nd OF JANUARY, 2019. AYES NAYS ABSENT 222 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 223 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Public Hearing and Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, approving a General Plan Amendment and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) in order to construct a 29-unit residential development and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 GPA, S) (Planning) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 223 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing and Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, approving a General Plan Amendment and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) in order to construct a 29-unit residential development and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 GPA, S) PREPARED BY: Martin Reeder, AICP PHONE: 619-336-4313 DEPARTMENT: Planning. APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: The applicant is proposing to merge nine undeveloped single family Tots into one and develop the site with a 29-unit residential condominium project. The site includes the westerly half of the vacated portion of "M" Avenue adjacent to the east of the properties. In order to build this type of project, the existing single-family zoning needs to be changed to a multi -family land use and zone. This type of change requires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use from Low -Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential land use, and a Zone Change from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1). The amendment and zone change were initiated together by the Planning Commission last year. The Zone Change is addressed in a separate Ordinance. The attached background report describes the project in detail. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: APPROVED: APPROVED: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map. Vote: Ayes — Baca, DelaPaz, Garcia, Sendt, Quintero, Yamane Noes: Flores ATTACHMENTS: 1. Background Report 5. Site Photos 2. Recommended Findings 6. Applicant's Plans 3. Recommended Conditions 7. Public Notice 4. Overhead 8. Resolution 224 of 473 BACKGROUND REPORT Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map. The proposed development meets three General Plan Policies related to Land Use, and is also consistent with the City's Housing Element. Executive Summary The applicant is proposing to merge nine undeveloped single family lots into one and develop the site with a 29-unit residential condominium project. The site includes the westerly half of the vacated portion of "M" Avenue adjacent to the east of the properties. In order to build this type of project, the existing single-family zoning needs to be changed to a multi -family land use and zone. This type of change requires a General Plan Amendment to change the land use from Low -Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential land use, and a Zone Change from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1). The amendment and zone change were initiated together by the Planning Commission last year. History The Planning Commission initiated the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change on May 1, 2017. As mentioned above, the project also included the vacation of the portion of "M" Avenue adjacent to the site. The City Council initiated the Street Vacation on April 4, 2017. The Planning Commission held a hearing to determine if the vacation was in conformance with the General Plan. After considering concerns from the National School District, who own the property on the opposite side of the "M" Avenue right-of-way, the Planning Commission determined General Plan conformance on June 5, 2017. The City Council ordered vacation of the 451 feet of "M" Avenue adjacent to the project on August 1, 2017. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their meeting of December 3, 2018 and voted to recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map by a vote of six to one. Site Characteristics The project site is comprised of nine existing single-family lots, all of which are vacant, and 451 feet of the half width (30 feet) of "M" Avenue to the east, which has now been vacated. The whole project area is approximately 74,500 square feet in size, or roughly 1.7 acres, and is undeveloped. ATTACHMENT 1 225 of 473 The area slopes down from East 16th Street to South Bay Plaza (south to north) and from west to east, to form a rough valley shape. There is an existing single-family neighborhood to the west, which is located atop and behind a large hill; there is an existing mixed -density neighborhood of duplexes and triplexes located across East 16th Street to the south; South Bay Plaza is located to the north, beyond an existing grove of trees at the bottom of the valley area; the National School District offices and bus yard is located to the east, on the other side of the vacated "M" Avenue. The street was considered a "paper street" (the street was shown on the Assessor's Parcel Map but was not developed as a street). The property to be developed has a current land use designation of Low -Medium Density Residential, which allows up to nine units per acre. The current zoning designation is RS-2, which generally allows one single-family residence per lot. Proposal The applicant wishes to construct a 29-unit multi -family residential development on the site. The project consists of nine buildings and 75 parking spaces (45 garage and 29 open), along with required open space. The project would be a condominium project with each unit owned individually and the property being jointly owned by the 29 potential owners. The project is being called "City Village" and is a grouping of 29 three -bedroom, two and half bath, and two-story townhomes. For most units there are individual entries, one or two car garages, and private patios and balconies. The architectural style echoes the area's early Spanish heritage. The project is a gated community in a suburban setting providing both safety along with common use areas for growing families. Abundant landscaping, including trees, shrubs, vines, and groundcover, is provided, which also aids in visual screening of and from surrounding areas. Because the Low -Medium Density Residential land use and RS-2 zone designations only allow a maximum density of nine units per acre and one unit per lot respectively, the existing land use and zoning maps need to be changed to accommodate the development, which requires both a General Plan Amendment (Land Use Map) and a Zone Change (Zoning Map). As previously mentioned, these changes have been initiated. This step is the next part of the process in which public hearings are held at both the Planning Commission and City Council level. 2 226 of 473 Analysis When considering a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change, the Planning Commission must take into account the surrounding land uses and neighborhood makeup, as well as consistency with the General Plan and other governing documents. The single-family neighborhood to the west of the project area has an average density of around five units per acre. The mixed -density neighborhood to the south (one block either side of "M" Avenue) has an average density of approximately 11 units per acre. The proposed 29-unit project would result in a density of approximately 17 units per acre, similar to the neighborhood to the south. Although roughly three times the density of the properties to the west, the project site is separated by grade from these properties and would not be a direct impact to the single-family area. Under the current land use and zoning, a 1.7-acre parcel would yield approximately 15 units. If rezoned to RM-1 (Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential), as proposed by the applicant, the parcel would yield approximately 39 units. However, the applicant is only proposing 29 units. As part of this General Plan and zoning amendment application, the developer is also applying for a Tentative Subdivision Map, which allows review of the architecture and design of the project. Conditions will ensure the number of units will be kept at 29. General Plan If amended, the Land Use designation for this property will be Medium Density Residential, which has a maximum density range of 9 to 23 units per acre. In this case, the project is at a proposed density of 17 units per acre, within the allowable range. There are several General Plan Policies that are pertinent to this proposal, specifically: Policy LU-2.3: Provide for a variety of housing types including, but not limited to, single-family attached and detached, multifamily apartments, condominiums, and mobile homes. Policy LU 4.3: Promote infill development, redevelopment, rehabilitation, and reuse efforts that contribute positively to existing neighborhoods and surrounding areas. Policy LU-7.1: Establish incentives to promote the use and development of vacant infill parcels and the intensification of land uses on underutilized parcels to realize the greatest benefit to the community. 3 227 of 473 The area is vacant and prime for development. Having a comprehensive residential project in this area will contribute to the City's housing needs. The area is not homogenous in nature with regard to residential housing types — there are single-family residences on larger lots located to the west, with a mix of medium to higher -density properties to the south across East 16th Street; these lots are developed with everything from duplexes, to triplexes, to apartments. Housing Element The nine lots adjacent to "M" Avenue were originally subdivided from one large property in 2000. The area has remained vacant ever since. Merging the parcels and adding half of the vacated street to the east would increase the potential of the property. The resultant property size and configuration would be better able to provide a mix of housing that is consistent with the needs of the Housing Element, which focuses on (among other things): • Matching housing supply with need • Maximizing housing choice throughout the community Land Use Code (LUC) The RM-1 zone allows for up to 23 units per acre. The proposed project has a density of approximately 17 units per acre. In the case of a 1.7-acre project area, the maximum allowable number of units would be 39. However, the applicant is limiting the project to 29 units. There is also a maximum lot coverage of 75% of the lot. The project is within these parameters. Architecture The development features eight buildings laid out in four groups. The two groups in the center of the development have central common area courtyards that include seating and barbecue areas. Most of the buildings are two-story in design, with the exception of the central two buildings, which are three stories tall. These structures have four units below with one unit above. This massing allows a transition from the street from lower to higher, thus respecting the lower heights along East 16th Street. The architectural style is Spanish/Mediterranean, featuring stucco walls, balconies, lots of wall -plane variation, pitched roofs, shutters, and arched windows in some cases. The roofs will be one of three styles — tile, concrete, or asphalt shingle. The LUC requires consideration of the impact of bulk on neighboring properties, facade and roof articulation, scale that is sensitive to surrounding uses, balconies and porches, adequate disposal facilities, minimum amount of laundry facilities, and adequate storage space. The 4 228 of 473 tentative project plans (Attachment No. 5, Exhibit "A") are consistent with LUC requirements, which are also included as conditions of approval. Landscaping The concept landscape and irrigation plan submitted with the application shows a robust plant palette with street, screening, and canopy trees; and shrubs, ground cover, and vines. The landscape plan is included as part of Attachment No. 5, Exhibit "A". While all areas along the property and building frontages are shown as landscaped, the most prominent part of the landscape and irrigation plan is south of the project in what was the recently vacated westerly 30 feet of "M" Avenue right-of-way. The project bio-retention system is located in this area, which also includes planted retaining walls, trellises with seating areas, a scenic walkway, and vehicular access path. There is also a tot lot located in the northeast corner of the project. The open space area will be graded such that the entire project will drain to and be retained by the area, which will ensure that no storm water impacts affect adjacent properties. Conditions of approval include compliance with Chapter 18.44 (Landscaping) of the LUC, with particular emphasis on Section 18.44.190, which related to water efficient landscape requirements. Storm water requirements are par of the Engineering Department conditions. Open Space Multi -unit residential projects have a minimum amount of private and common open space that is required, which is exceeded in this project. Open space is required as follows: • Private open space — 60 square feet per unit o Excess private open space may count toward common open space requirements (each square -foot of excess counts as two square feet of common open space) • Common open space 0 300 square feet per unit (up to 200 square feet may consist of excess private open space) The applicant is proposing the following mix of open space: Open Space Open space required Open space provided Private 1,740 4,500 (+2,760)* Common 8,700 9,120 (3,600 + 5,520*) 5 229 of 473 The numbers in the table above are all areas that are provided on site. The bio- retention area and walkway area is also considered common open space and is more than 13,500 square feet in size. This area also acts a visual buffer, both for project residents and adjacent uses. Parking/Circulation Parking for multi -unit residential projects is required as follows: • Studio or one- bedroom units — 1.3 spaces per unit • Two or more bedrooms — 1.5 spaces per unit • Guest parking o First 20 units — half a space per unit o Over 20 — quarter space per unit The applicant is proposing the following mix of units: Resident parking Spaces required Spaces provided 2 bedrooms (29) 44 47 Guest parking 13 13 Total parking 57 60 Parking has been provided in excess of the required amount. While not required, all but four of the units have private garages. Of the 25 units with garages, nine have two -car garages and 16 have one -car garages. Enough surface spaces are provided to afford the minimum resident and guest parking requirement, as well as three additional parking spaces. Tentative Subdivision Map The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. As previously mentioned above, the development would be a condominium project with each unit owned individually and the property being jointly owned by the 29 potential owners. Conditions of approval include the requirement for a Home Owner's Association and Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), which will ensure that all development improvements are maintained for the life of the project. In addition, the density, lot dimensions, and minimum lot size requirements are consistent with the Subdivision Ordinance. Required findings for approval of the Tentative Subdivision The Municipal Code contains required findings for Tentative Subdivision Maps. There are nine required findings: 6 230 of 473 1. The proposed map is consistent with the National City General Plan and applicable specific plans. The project is in compliance with all required density and zoning requirements, provides additional home ownership opportunities consistent with the General Plan and Housing Element, and meets all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance (NCMC Title 17), including minimum lot size and dimension. There are no specific plans in the area. 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development. The 1.7-acre property can accommodate the requested number of units within the limits for density and lot coverage established by the General Plan and Land Use Code. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The proposed multi -family residential development, at a density of 17 units per acre, is less than the 23 units per acre allowed in the Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM- 1) zone, and the proposed infill development increases the available housing units in the City. 4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The property is surrounded by urban development and there are no bodies of water present on -site. While there is plant habitat on site in the form of native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project provides for mitigation that will reduce potential impacts to a level of less than significance. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The property is currently vacant and surrounded by existing urban development. In addition, the land use and zoning designations as proposed allow for the density requested, which has been analyzed as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration associated with this project. 7 231 of 473 The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision. No such easements exist or would be affected by the proposed development. 7. The discharge of sewerage waste from the subdivision into the City of National City sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code, as specified by Government Code Section 66474.6. The project is required to install sewerage systems that meet current requirements for sewage disposal by the Conditions of Approval of this permit. 8. The subdivision has been considered by the Planning Commission with regard to its effect on the housing needs of the region, and these needs are balanced by the public service needs of the residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. The project will provide twenty-nine new homeownership opportunities, which is consistent with and encouraged by the City's Housing Element. 9. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision, based on consideration of local climate, topography, property configuration and other design and improvement requirements without requiring reduction in allowable density or lot coverage. The landscape plan submitted as part of the proposal provides in excess of the required common open space area for such developments. All new construction proposed will be in compliance with the California Building Code, which takes such factors in to consideration. Findings for denial There are also two findings for denial of the proposal based on General Plan consistency and habitat impacts: 1. The proposed map is not consistent with the National City General Plan. 8 232 of 473 The project is not in compliance with the required density and zoning requirements of the surrounding Small Lot Residential (RS-2) zone; the proposed density of 17 units per acre exceeds the average area density of eleven units per acre. The increased density would be out of character with that of the surrounding area. 2. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure plant habitat. There is plant habitat on site in the form of native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, which will require removal and replacement elsewhere in order to accommodate the project. Department comments Comments were provided by the Fire Department and Sweetwater Authority. The Fire Department requires compliance with fire codes related to fire protection and property access; Sweetwater Authority comments referred to required water infrastructure and final map information. Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval for Tentative Subdivision Maps have been included in the staff report, as well as those addressing department and agency comments as discussed above. Standard Engineering Department conditions related to final maps are likewise included. Planning Department conditions are related to building permit requirements, cultural resource protection during grading, off -site parking, homeowners association, and CC&Rs (Codes, Covenants, and Regulations). In addition, all mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) attached to the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) are included as conditions of approval. Summary The subject property is vacant and prime for development. In order for the applicant to be able to develop the property in a comprehensive and efficient manner, the zoning needs to be changed. The existing lots are large and it is generally not economically feasible to develop all nine lots together in a manner beneficial to both the developer and the City. Changing the land use and zoning would allow for a quality development that is closer to the average density of nearby residential areas. The proposed development meets three General Plan Policies related to Land Use and is also consistent with the City's Housing Element. In addition, the proposed project would be consistent with all requirements for architectural design, landscaping, open space, and on -site parking. 9 233 of 473 Options 1. Approve 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S subject to the attached conditions of approval, based on the attached findings or findings to be determined by the City Council; or 2. Deny 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S based on the attached findings or findings to be determined by the City Council; or, 3. Continue the item to a later date in order to obtain additional information. If the City Council certifies the associated MND and approves the project, an Ordinance amending the General Plan and Zoning Map will need to be subsequently introduced and adopted. 10 234 of 473 RECOMMENDED FINDING FOR APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-04 GPA, ZC — 16th & "M" Avenue 557-351-17 through 25 1. The proposed development is consistent with General Plan Land Use Policies LU- 2.3, LU 4.3, and LU-7.1, because the area is vacant and prime for development. Having a comprehensive residential project in this area will contribute to the City's housing needs. The area is not homogenous in nature with regard to residential housing types — there are single-family residences on larger lots located to the west, with a mix of medium to higher -density properties to the south across East 16th Street. These Tots are developed with everything from duplexes, to triplexes, to apartments. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 2017-04 S — 16th & "M" Avenue 557-351-17 through 25 1 The proposed map is consistent with the National City General Plan and applicable specific plans, because the project is in compliance with all required density and zoning requirements, provides additional home ownership opportunities consistent with the General Plan and Housing Element, and meets all requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance (NCMC Title 17), including minimum lot size and dimension. There are no specific plans in the area. 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development, because the 1.7-acre property can accommodate the requested number of units within the limits for density and lot coverage established by the General Plan and Land Use Code. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, because the proposed multi -family residential development, at a density of 17 units per acre, is less than the 23 units per acre allowed in the Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) zone, and the proposed infill development increases the available housing units in the City. 4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or ATTACHMENT 2 11 235 of 473 wildlife or their habitat, because the property is surrounded by urban development and there are no bodies of water present on -site. While there is plant habitat on site in the form of native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project provides for mitigation that will reduce potential impacts to a level of less than significance. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, because the property is currently vacant and surrounded by existing urban development. In addition, the land use and zoning designations as proposed allow for the density requested, which has been analyzed as part of the Mitigated Negative Declaration associated with this project. 6. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, because no such easements exist or would be affected by the proposed development. 7. The discharge of sewerage waste from the subdivision into the City of National City sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code, as specified by Government Code Section 66474.6, because the project is required to install sewerage systems that meet current requirements for sewage disposal by the Conditions of Approval of this permit. 8. The subdivision has been considered by the Planning Commission with regard to its effect on the housing needs of the region, and these needs are balanced by the public service needs of the residents and available fiscal and environmental resources, the project will provide twenty-nine new homeownership opportunities, which is consistent with and encouraged by the City's Housing Element. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision, based on consideration of local climate, topography, property configuration and other design and improvement requirements without requiring reduction in allowable density or lot coverage, because the landscape plan submitted as part of the proposal provides in excess of the required common open space area for such developments. All new construction proposed will be in compliance with the California Building Code, which takes such factors in to consideration. 12 236 of 473 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL OF THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 2017-04 S — 16th & "M" Avenue 557-351-17 through 25 1 The proposed map is not consistent with the National City General Plan, because the project is not in compliance with the required density and zoning requirements of the surrounding Small Lot Residential (RS-2) zone; the proposed density of 17 units per acre exceeds the average area density of eleven units per acre. The increased density would be out of character with that of the surrounding area. 2. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure plant habitat, because there is plant habitat on site in the form of native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, which will require removal and replacement elsewhere in order to accommodate the project. RECOMMENDED FINDING FOR DENIAL OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-04 GPA, ZC — 16th & "M" Avenue 557-351-17 through 25 1. The proposed development is not consistent with the General Plan, because the proposed development will result in a density of 17 units per acre, which exceeds the average area density of eleven units per acre. The increased density would be out of character with that of the surrounding area. 13 237 of 473 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S, IS — 16th & "M" Avenue 557-351-17 through 25 General 1 This General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map authorizes a 29-unit residential condominium project located northwest of the intersection of East 16th Street and the former "M" Avenue right-of-way. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform to Exhibits A and B, Case File No. 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S, IS, dated 6/18/2018). 2. This General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map shall not become effective until the Mitigated Negative Declaration associated with the project has been certified and the Notice of Determination for filed. 3. This Tentative Subdivision Map shall not become effective until the General Plan Amendment and Zone Change have been approved. 4. Before this General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map shall become effective, the applicant and/or the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Department that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the City Manager or assign prior to recordation. 5. Within four (4) days of approval, pursuant to Fish and Game Code 711.4 and the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 753.5, the applicant shall pay all necessary environmental filing fees for the San Diego County Clerk. Checks shall be made payable to the County Clerk. The current fee to record the Notice of Determination for a Mitigated Negative Declaration is $2,280.25, but may be subject to change. ATTACHMENT 3 14 238 of 473 6. Approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map expires two (2) years after adoption of the resolution of approval at 6:00 p.m. unless prior to that date a request for a time extension not exceeding three (3) years has been filed as provided by National City Municipal Code §17.04.070. Building 7. Plans submitted for improvements must comply with the current editions of the California Building, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Fire Codes. Engineering 8. A Hydrology study (100 year flood) is required for the new project. The study should consider the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection point. The study should consider the adequacy of the existing storm drain system to convey any additional run off. All Hydrology study findings and recommendations are part of Engineering Department requirements. 9. The Priority Project Applicability checklist for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) is required to be completed and submitted to the Engineering Department. The checklist will be required when a project site is submitted for review of the City Departments. The checklist is available at the Engineering Department. If it is determined that the project is subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" and the City of National City Storm Water Best Management Practices of the Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) approved Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) documentation will be required prior to issuance of an applicable engineering permit. The SUSMP shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. 10. The Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the maintenance of the proposed construction shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations which may require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. An approved SWPPP will be required prior to issuing of a construction permit. 11 All surface run-off shall be treated with an approved Standard Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) Best Management Practice (BMP) for all Priority SUSMP projects. No runoff will be permitted to flow over the sidewalk. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface run-off resulting from this development. 12 The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way. Sprinkler heads shall be adjusted so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk or the street. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner or, its successors or assigns, shall be remove and relocate all irrigation items from the 15 239 of 473 public right-of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. 13. Metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of all irrigation lines in the public right-of-way. 14.A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A private storm water treatment maintenance agreement shall be signed and recorded. A check list for preparation of the grading plan/drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department. 15.AII existing and proposed curb inlet on property shall be provided with a "No Dumping" signage in accordance with the NPDES program. 16.A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of- way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 17.Separate street and sewer plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted showing all of the existing and proposed improvements. The plans shall be in accordance with City requirements. 18.A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review, after Planning Commission approval. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City modified Standard Drawing G-34. All soils report findings and recommendations shall be part of the Engineering Department requirements. 19.The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 16 240 of 473 20. The existing street improvements along the property frontage(s) shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers, or other approved methods. 21.AII existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer shall restore them after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the City of National City Engineering Department as soon as filed. 22.A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and any grading construction on private property. 23. Street improvements shall be in accordance with the City Standards. All missing street improvements shall be constructed. Abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. 24.A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department, after the City Council approval, for review of all existing easements and the ownership at the property. 25. All new dwellings are subject to a Transportation Development Impact Fee. This includes new homes, condos and apartments. The current fee is $2,484 and typically increases by approximately 2% per fiscal year (July 1 to June 30).. 26.AI1 electrical, telephone and similar distribution service wires for the new structure(s) shall be placed underground. 27.A cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours and consultant services. 28.A hydromodification plan or a letter sealed and signed by the Engineer of Work explaining why the project is exempt from hydromodification requirements shall be submitted. 29. The final parcel map shall meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and the City of National City Municipal Codes including certification, acknowledgement, complete boundary information and monumentation. 30. The developer shall submit to the Fire Department a letter from Sweetwater Authority stating existing fire flow. If determined by the Fire Department that additional improvements are needed, the developer shall enter into an agreement for the water improvements with the Sweetwater Authority prior to obtaining the final map approval. 17 241 of 473 31. The developer shall bond for the monumentation, the public improvements and the on -site grading, drainage, landscaping, and other improvements through an agreement with the City prior to the approval of the final map. 32. SUSMP documentation, as necessary, must be submitted and approved. 33. The final map shall be recorded prior to issuance of any building permit. 34.AII new property line survey monuments shall be set on private property, unless otherwise approved. 35. The parcel map/final map shall use the California Coordinate System for its "Basis of Bearings" and express all measured and calculated bearings in terms of the system. The angle of grid divergence from a true meridian and the north point shall appear on the map. Two measured ties from the boundary of the property to existing horizontal control stations shall be shown. Fire 36. Plans submitted for improvements must comply with the current editions of the California Fire Code (CFC) and National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), and the current edition of the California Code of Regulations at the time of plan submittal. 37. Fire apparatus access roads shall comply with the requirements of this section (CFC 2016 Edition - Section 503.1.1) and shall extend to within 150 feet of all portions of the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the first story of the building as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved area for turning around fire apparatus. This comment shall apply to new residential structures. 38. The required width of emergency fire apparatus access roads shall not be obstructed in any manner, including parking of vehicles. All access roads shall be no Tess than 20 feet wide, no less than 14 feet high and shall have an all-weather road with the ability to support 75 thousand pounds or greater. Where a fire hydrant is located on a fire apparatus road, the minimum road width shall be 26 feet. A 28 foot turning radius is required for fire department access through site. All fire department access roads shall be painted and signed to prevent parking in these required designated emergency areas. 39. Buildings or portions of buildings or facilities exceeding 30 feet in height above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access shall be provided with approved fire apparatus access roads capable of accommodating fire department aerial apparatus. Overhead utility and power lines shall not be located within the aerial fire apparatus access roadway. 40. Fire hydrants that may be located throughout the project as not to have a separation distance greater than 400 feet. Fire hydrants to be located within 400 feet of all 18 242 of 473 locations which are roadway accessible (Measurement starts from nearest public fire hydrant to project). 41. The following items pertain to fire hydrants: a. Size and location, including size and number of outlets and whether outlets are to be equipped with independent gate valves. b. Fire hydrant to be of three outlet design. 42. Provide calculation confirming flow availability to meet fire flow demands and supply large diameter hose (4 inch). 43. Fire hydrants to be marked by use of blue reflective marker in the roadway. 44. Upon submittal for an underground permit, the following shall be included: • Data sheet for Back -Flows • Data sheets for Private and Commercial Hydrants • Data sheets for Post Indicator Valves Information on required fire hydrants back -flow devices, etc.; can be acquired from Sweetwater Authority. All pipes and their appliances, shall meet industry/code standards for underground use. 45. Fire Sprinklers will be required for this project. 46. If entrance/exit gates are used, gates shall be equipped with Knox Box and Emergency Strobes so as to provide emergency vehicle access and egress. A Knox Key Switch shall be required in conjunction with strobe for emergency access, and shall be placed at front of property. Please contact the National City Fire Department for exact field location. 47. Should any plan corrections be required, contractor must correct the plan and re- submit to the Fire Department for approval once again prior to installation. Planning 48. Plans submitted for construction shall comply with Land Use Code requirements and design guidelines related to bulk, facade and roof articulation, scale that is sensitive to surrounding uses, balconies and porches, adequate disposal facilities, minimum amount of laundry facilities, and adequate storage space. 49. Plans submitted for construction shall include a landscape and irrigation plan in compliance with Land Use Code Chapter 18.44 (Landscaping), including Section 18.44.190, related to water efficient landscape requirements. The landscaping required by this approval shall be maintained for the life of the project. 50. If any cultural resources are found during grading or construction, work is to stop and the lead agency and a qualified archaeologist be consulted to determine the importance of the find and its appropriate management. In the event of the 19 243 of 473 accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains during construction, the applicant is required take all appropriate steps as required by relevant federal, state, and local laws. 51.All trash enclosures shall be in compliance with Municipal Code Title 7, Section 7.10.080 (Enclosures required), including the use of flame retardant materials. 52. All site and project lighting shall in compliance with Municipal Code Title 18.46 (Outdoor lighting). 53. The developer shall provide a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions, running with the land, clearly setting forth the privileges and responsibilities, including maintenance, payment of taxes, etc. involved in the common ownership of parking areas, walks, buildings, utilities and open spaces prior to approval of the final map. Said CC&R's shall be subject to approval as to content and form by the City Attorney. The CC&R's shall allow the City the authority but not the obligation to assume maintenance of the property and assess the full cost including overhead costs therefore as a lien against the property if said property is not adequately maintained per the agreement. The CC&R's shall include a determination that the funds provided by the maintenance provisions will be sufficient to cover all contemplated costs. 54.A corporation, association, property owners' group, or similar entity shall be formed with the right to assess all the properties which are jointly owned with interests in the common areas and facilities in the entire development to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded conditions, covenants, and restrictions approved by the City Attorney as to form and content, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs and services. 55.Impacts to native and non-native grasslands shall be mitigated off site. Impacts to native grasslands (e.g., grasslands having at least 10% native cover) shall be mitigated at a minimum of 2: 1 and non-native grasslands be mitigated at a 1: 1 ratio. 56.There is a patch of several hundred specimens of San Diego Ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) located at the northern end of the property. This is a high -profile sensitive species. Project conditions require mitigation in the form of salvage and transplantation. Approval of a translocation plan is required prior to initiating ground disturbing activities. The translocation plan should specify: 1) the methods used for translocation (e.g., timing of translocation, seed collection, soil retention, etc.); 2) the location and suitability of the receptor site; 3) a long-term management plan for the receptor site; and 4) a long-term funding mechanism. The translocation receptor site should have long-term conservation value, be contiguous with other large, conserved tracts of land, and be managed and protected in perpetuity. The translocation plan should be submitted for review and 20 244 of 473 approval by the Department of Fish & Wildlife prior to the onset of project impacts. 57.The onsite drainage is considered as Freshwater Emergent Wetland, which qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters. State and federal permitting to allow this drainage to be impacted will be required by the US Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All required permits or related authorizations for the project related to impacting wetlands/waters are a condition of project approval and will need to be secured prior to any development activities taking place. 58.The landscape design and planting palette shall use native plants to the greatest extent feasible in landscaped areas. The Project applicant shall not plant, seed, or otherwise introduce invasive exotic plant species to landscaped areas adjacent and/or near native habitat areas. Exotic plant species not to be used include those species listed on the California Invasive Plant Council's (Cal-IPC) Invasive Plant Inventory. This list includes (but is not limited to) the following: pepper trees, pampas grass, fountain grass, ice plant, myoporum, black locust, capeweed, tree of heaven, periwinkle, sweet alyssum, English ivy, French broom, Scotch broom, and Spanish broom. 59. In order to prevent potential impacts regarding the spread of invasive species during vegetation clearing activities, prior to any such work being undertaken all new equipment introduced to the project area shall be cleaned, and all equipment shall be maintained daily. Additional techniques for minimizing the spread of invasive plant species during construction activities can be found at https://www.cal ipc.org/solutions/ prevention/. Sweetwater Authority 60. Water service must be provided from an Authority owned water main located within the public right-of-way or an Authority owned easement. Following vacation of the undeveloped portion of "M" Avenue, all water to serve the site shall be required to be obtained from an existing 16-inch PVC water main located within the right-of-way on East 16th Street. 61. The Final Map shall be submitted to the Authority for its review and comments prior to recordation. 21 245 of 473 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S, IS — 16th & "M" — Overhead ATTACHMENT 4 246 of 473 N N Site Photos — 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S, IS — East 16th Street & "M" Avenue Looking north from East 16th Street Looking northwest from East 16th Street ATTACHMENT 5 23 247 of 473 EXHI131T; /- CASE FILE NO.: 2-0%i .-04t VA- / ZG / S, ) 5 DATE; 6 i (8 / 1 - FIRST FLOOR FLOOR FLAN AVERA..GE SIZE: 1 A3O 5. F SEOOND FLOOR ATTACHMENT 6 GITY VILLAGE 1 0 " STRGGT, NATIONAL CM" GGRaesians P.011l:61.660.116 IEB:CL-RpL5161fiL0- 24 248 of 473 ADDRESS 16THd M AVE, NATIONAL GMT GA 919 _ LONE RM-I 1 6th STREET LOOKING NORTH - A 16th STREET fl SITE PLAN a•. • 1'.22-C CITY VILLAGE IS A GROUPING OF 29 THREEBEOROOM TWO AND S BATHS TWO STORY TOWNHOMES. FOR 1,051" UNITS THERE ARE INDIVIDUAL ENTRY'S. ONE OR TWO GAR GARAGES. AND PRIVATE PATIOS AND BALCONIES. THE BUILDING MASSING SUGGESTS ELEMENTS FOR THE AREAS EARLY SPANISH HERITAGE. A GATED GOMMUNTY IN A SUBURBAN SETTING. PROVIDING BOTH SAFETY ALONG WITH COMMON USE AREAS FOR GROWI116 FAMILIES. ABUNDANT LANDSCAPING PROVIDES MINIMAL VISUAL IMPACT TOWARD THE SURROUNDING AREAS. •75—..1....... .. :. ..N,...,'-cr.,=;•.. :6 as 'w UNIT • 1 2 UNIT • I O S 1 1 '" UNR•25 TQl LOT ex48c°3r`ira`akiVe UN1T..3O �YCE 11ZEf5EJ PARKING STILE PRIVATESPACE1519 ] A 1490 2ATTACHEp TOWNHOUSE 1005FBALGOHY 1 20FAT10 Al 1450 I ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 100 5SF BALCONY 1 CARPORT 4 B 1446 2ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 1005F BALCONY 1005F PATIO 4 B1 1446 1 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 10OSFBALCONY 2 C. 1200 2 CARPORT FLAT 120 SF PATIO 4 D 1450 1TTTACHED TOWNHOUSE 2005F BALCONY I CARPORT 2 1446 IATTACHED TOWNHOUSE I20 SF BALCONY 1 CARPORT F 1450 1 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 120SP BALCONY I CARPORT 2205F PATIO 2 6 1450 2ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 120 SF BALCONY 2205F PATIO 2 61 1450 AATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 1205E BALCONY 1 CARPORT 220 SFPATIO 29 TOTAL AREA CALCULATIONS PRIVATE SPACE REOIARED 29 UNITS x 605F - 11405F PRIVATE SPACE SHOWN 45005F COMMON SPACE REOu1RE0 29 UNITS x5005F. 57005F COMMON SPACE PROVIDE ON SITE l5 AREAS 1200 5F. 56005F 01FPERENCE 51005F EXCESS PRIVATE SPACE 45005F- 12405F. 21605F EXCESS PRIVATE SUBSTITUTED FOR COMMON 5F.• 2260 5F x 2. 5524 5E LARGER THAN 5 100 5F PARKING REQUIRED: 29 x 1.S SPACES PER UNIT 4 SFACE5 GUEST PARKING REQUIRED 5 SPACES FOR FIRST 20 UNITS • 10 .25 FOR21-29 . 5 TOTAL REOUIRED PARK N6 SPACES .51 SPACES TOTAL PARKING SPACES ON 51TE . 60SPACES PROJECT LOOK ROOF MATERIALS COMMON AREA CITY VILLAGE 1 6T'• STREET, NATIONAL CITY GCRdesigns PL. 544.4.50.44 24 .444 9.992-69H6•e NKRGov rap .e...me. .scam 25 16N4F1SC14v0Af_21224 .G140.4: 249 of 473 s PROPOSED )•J4TTC GATES ENHANCED COLORED LAND STAMPED CONCRETE, TYPICAL . 'IAN GATE-: GROUNDCOVER, TYPICAL STREET TREES. TYPICAL M':ORAA'T{in...T'ON SMALL ' VERTICAL. _. -,,: FLOWERING -COLUMNAR TREES, SHRUB, TYPICAL TYPICAL -' ��> �3 > Zj.' >.. i�,:{� •4�_ '.+'.4i'!••_ ele 8.33%RAMP -REMOVE EXIBIEVIEVEHICULAR FENCE APIDUSE.RAMP WITH BLACK CHAIN LINK AND GATE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN SCALE I'=16'0' PLANTING NOTES .•.•••fIt •• PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, ATYPICAL 1. THE PLANTING PLANS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC. MINOR ADJUSTMENTS IN PLANT LOCATIONS AND TYPE MAY BE MADE AT THE DISCRETION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 2 ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND REPLACED UPON REQUEST BEFORE OR AFTER THE PLANTING. 1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR WILL COORDINATE HIS WORK WITH THE OTHER TRADES AND MAINTAIN DRAINAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. J. PLANT QUANTITIES AND AREAS SHOWN ON LEGENDS ARE FOR CONTRACTORS CONVENIENCE IN ESTIMATING ONLY. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING PLANT MATERIALS TO COVER ALL AREAS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. SLOPE ALL PLANTING AREAS AWAY FROM BUILDING AT 2% MINIMUM FOR 5 FEET MINIMUM, WHERE APPLICABLE. d. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE FINAL PLACEMENT OF ALL TREES, SHRUBS. AND VINES PRIOR TO PLANTING. 7 TREE AND SHRUB PITS 5 GALLONS AND SMALLER SHALL BE TWO TIMES ROOTBALL DIAMETER WIDE AND 1-1l2 TIMES CONTAINER DEPTH. d. TREE AND SHRUB PITS 15 GALLONS AND LARGER SHALL BE TWO TIMES ROOTBALL DIAMETER WIDE AND 1• LESS THAN CONTAINER DEPTH. 9. TREE STAKING SHALL BE DONE ONLY IF ESSENTIAL AND REQUIRED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TREES THAT CANNOT STAND WITHOUT THE NURSERY STAKE SHALL BE REJECTED. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TREES STABILITY DURING THE LENGTH OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. ALL STAKING AND GUYING MATERIALS SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE END OF THE 1-YEAR TREE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 10. DO NOT DAMAGE PLANT ROOTBALL DURING TRANSPORTATION OR PLANTING. I1. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT SCHEDULE FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. ASOIL TEST SHALL BE MADE BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. AND RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS SHALL BE USED FOR ACTUAL INSTALLATION. 100 LBS. OF GYPSUM PER 1000 SQ. FT. 70 LBS. OF TRI-C (6-24 W/ 5% SULFUR) PER 1000 SQ. FT. 8 LBS. OF IRON SULFATE PER 1000 SQ. FT. 25 LBS. OF SOIL SULFUR PER 1000 50. FT. 5 CUBIC YARDS OF NITROLIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT PER 1000 SQ. FT. (SEE NOTE 16) 12. AMENDED SOIL SHALL BE ROTOTILLED TO A DEPTH OF e'. 13. NO IRON SULFATE SHALL COME IN CONTACT WITH ANY MASONRY SURFACE 14. NITROLI280 ORGANIC AMENDMENT SHALL BE HUMIC COMPOST FROM 4A•+R#f#HITS ! o# •f •• •••••�•# i NEW 8' WIDE CONCRETE OR D.G. PATH AND RAMPS AGRI-SERVICE. LOAMEX' , OR APPROVED EQUAL 15. A PLANTING BACKFILL MIX FOR ALL CONTAINER PLANTS EXCEPT FERNS. A7A1 FAR, CAMELLIAS, WISTERIA, JASMINUM, OPHIOPOGON. HISSER/1AS. TRACHELOSPERMUM, ESCALLONIA, LIRIOPE. BEGONIAS. IMPATIENS, CWIAS. ROSES, OR AS NOTED IN PLAN. SHALL CONSIST OF 1/3 NITROLIZEC ORGANIC AMENDMENT AND 273 EXISTING SOIL PLUS 2-1/2 LBS. OF SOIL SULFUR. 2 LBS. IRON SULFATE PER CU. YO., 4 LBS. GYPSUM. AND 8 LBS. OF TRI.0 (6.2.4 WI 5% SULFUR) PER CUBIC YARD. B. PLANTING BACKFILL MIX FOR ALL FERNS. AZALEAS. CAMELLIAS. WISTERIA, JASMINUM, OPHIOPOGON. HIBBERTIAS,TRACHELOSPERMUM, ESCAU.ONIA, LIRIOPE, BEGONIAS, IMPATIENS, CLMAS, AND ROSES. SHALL CONSIST OF 1/3 EXISTING SOIL 1/3 NITROLIZED ORGANIC AMENDMENT ANC 1)3 THOROUGHLY WETTED PEATMOSS. AND OTHER AMENDMENTS NOTED IN 17A. MIXED TO A UNIFORM PLANTING MEDIUM, AND WATERED IN AFTER PLANTING. C. ALL PLANTED AREAS SHALL BE WATERED IN THOROUGHLY WITH SARVON^', PER MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS IN ADVANCE OF PLANTING. D. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE WATERED THOROUGHLY WITH SUPERTHRIVE"' WITHIN 1 HOUR OF PLANTING. ALL PLANTS 1-GALLON SIZE OR LARGER SHALL RECEIVE AGRIFORM 21•GRAM 20.10.5 FERTILIZER TABLETS AT THE RATES RECOMMENDED BY MANUFACTURER 16. ALL PLANTS INSTALLED FROM FLATS SHALL RECEIVE ONE AGRIFORM 5-GRAM 20-10-5 TABLET EACH, AND ALL 4' POTS SHALL RECEIVE TWO 5-GRAM TABLETS EACH. MIXED WITH A HANDFUL OF PREPARED BACKFILL PER NOTE 17. 17. ALL TYING MATERIALS AND MARKING TAPES SHALL BE REMOVED AT THE TIME OF PLANTING. 18. STAKES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM VINES AND VINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH AN APPROVED MEANS OF SUPPORT. 19. ALL SHRUB PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE COVERED WITH A 1• DEEP LAYER OF SHREDDED FIR SARK OR APPROVED EQUALFASTENED WITH STAPLES FLUSH TO THE FABRIC TO PREVENT MOVEMENT. 20. IF THE SOIL TEST PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED SHOWS THAT PERMEABILITY RATES ARE LESS THAN .5' PER HOUR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MAY REQUIRE ATREE DRAIN SYSTEM. 21. A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PERIOD OF 90 DAYS SHALL BE CONSIDERED PART OF THIS CONTRACT. REFER TO THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DETAILS. I••••••Q BID- RETENTION AREAS PLANTED WITH GRASSES, TYPICAL. SEE SECTION BELOW PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, TYPICAL SECTION SCALE 7 .1'.G' BBC/ AREA WITH SMALL TABLES AND FLOWERING SHADE TREES, TYPICAL STRUCTURE SEE ELEVATIONS BELOW 'EVERGREEN MEDIUM ACCENT LANU-' --.BS,TYPICAL TREE, TYPICAL HYDRANT LOCATI BIKE RACK _ ENHANCED' COLORED AND -STAMPED CONCRETE, TYPICAL ...,..,,vw{i�{y.SS.=i-...>.:S.�i'.� z'�i�Zw>.Sf>S.• c:; >::'C �>. v» •••• ••• * YMiM• BIO RETENTION AREAS PLANTED WITH GRASSES, TYPICAL 01 21 UI wl "'L SMALL FLOWERING TREES co 2I • YsJ' „WI SCREENING wL TREES, TYPICAL SCALE L10 00110-0-0i3-eee014e15R1 doe DIIO 99999IIVOIID,, 9D6 STRUCTURE WITH TABLES AND BENCHES, SEE SECTION BELOW BIO RETENTION AREAS -PLANTED - WITH GRASSES, TYPICAL , PROPOSED SHADE STRUCTURE& PICNIC TABLES AREA WITH HEADER AND BENCHES 04 B 32 LV SOtP I�:. L 2LDSCAPE 6 ARCHITECTS • 2643 401 Avenue San Diego CA 92103 phone 619.544.1977 ongeino@osotebeom www.050teb.com M STREET & 16TH AVENUE PLAT CI.AL CM. CA CRY SUBSOISAL 05.07.15 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN A PROPOS6J- minc GAT& -Eb MAN GAIE Z 0 L S ET BAC K H 1YDROZONE 2 LOW/MEDIUM — - WATER USE AHRUBS-WIT-H diRIP li--, ;, - .1 RIGATION . 1 ..., -km .... ow iql ri , lo, tit. Il k.414 •:f: 0 •Nr f • • ' • , 'Wit 2 fl/h111/11.17/110MMIIMMY//12' 41 I HYDROZONE 1 ' " LOW WATER USE 'SHRUBS WITH DRIP IRRIGATION falerliffiff Offlaff#14.,110 na* .m):+:4•Ati ;atm fi Fagg Neff I 11 1 LUL.0.1.1IUN Ari §0 WINFINPWI USE TREES WITH BUBBLER IRRIGATION ' HYDROZONE 4 SPECIAL_ LANDSCAPE AREA - RECREATIONAL USE LAWN AN zw1M7 11149 A404,7 SiEdifkozalhill if ,r7 1/1E/1/ENSHA fVt." /74 if de iiiMMI 1 ISPONEWEWORT /I/ MI Naggif#01#11 110 / 1 /MONA, pa' Ar ///// I .0,"7 OA/WM V 1 hi 0 1 17/ fir i s 'Nowa HYDROZON: SPECIAL / LANDSCAPE AREA - EDIBL CITRUS GRO 4.4. Fir NIA•i+,4 4;4143 '47,4 • '' • " • ••• • • • ,....-•••••••• • •-•,...,,&•-•.,•-•.•.—•••!••- •;•• SCHEMATIC IRRIGATION PLAN SCALE 1,16-0' il RIZOFS ill fifil AFINPM.„ „ff / PLANT LIST ABBR I SIZE I SCIENTIFIC NAME TREES err. SPP. PtA ACE PRU. K.V. TRI. CON. SHRUBS AGA. B.G. AGA DES. ALO. A.R. DIA. C.B. DE. IRL LEP. R.G. LOM. LON. PHO. A7R POD. ICE RNA. UM. SAL S.B. WES. GB. WES.. ML 24BOX 24' BOX 24' BOX 24 SOX 24' BOX S GAL 5 GAL 1 GAL. 5 GAL 1 GAL CITRUS SPECIES CLIPANIOPSIS ANACAROIOIDES PLATANUS ACERIFOUA 'COLUMBIA' PRUNUS CERASIFERA 'KRAUTER VESUVIUS' TRISTANIA CONFERTA AGAVE 'BLUE FLAME' AGAVE 'BLUE GLOW AGAVE DESMETOANA VARIEGATA' ALOE IALWAY RED' CALLISTEMON LITRE JOHN' CUPRESSUS SEMPERIARENS DIANELLA 'CPSSA BLUE DIETES IRIDIODES LANTANA SPREADWG SUNSET LIEFROSPERNUM RUBY GLOW LOMANDRA LONGIFOUOA 'BREEZE MUHLENBERGIA CAPIUAFUS NASSEUA TENNUISIMA PHORMIUM TENAX ATROPURPUREUM PODOCARPUS ELOIGATUS TONNA!: RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR SALVIA SANTA BARBARA WF_STRINGIA FRUI1COSA 'GREY BOX' WESTRJNGIA FROTICOSA 'MORNING UGHP I COMMON NAME ORANGETREES CARROT WOOD LONDON PLANE PURPLE LEAF PLUM BRISBANE BOX BLUE FLAME AGAVE BLUE GLOW AGAVE VARIEGATED SMOOTH AGAVE ALWAYS RED LITTLE JOHN BOTTLEBRUSH CASSA BLUE FLAX LILY AFRICAN IRIS SPREADING SUNSET LANTANA RUBY GLOW NEW ZEALAND TEA TREE DWARF MAT RUSH NAIRAINN PAULY MEGCAN FEATHER GRASS GIANT BRONZE NEW ZEALAND RAX ICEE BLUE YELLOW -WOOD DWARF YEDDO HAWTHORN SANTA BARBARA SAGE DWARF COAST ROSEMARY MORNING LIGHT COASTROSEMARY VINES MAC. LING 15 GAL I MACFADYENA UNGUIS-CATI BIO RETENTION PLANTS CHONDROPEIALUMTECTORUM JUNCUS PATENS LEYMUS CONDENSATUS 'CANYON PRINCE' GROUNDCOVERS MYO. PAR. ROS. B.S. MYOPORUM PARV1FOLIUM 'PUTAH CREEK' ROSMARINUS OFFICINAUS 'SAPPHIRE SPREADER SENECIO MANDRAUSCAE EUROPEAN GREY SEDGE SMALL CAPE RUSH CAUFORNIA GRAY RUSH CANYON PMNCE WILD RYE CREEPING MYOPORUM SAPPHIRESAflWER ROSEMARY BLUE CHAU( STICKS I I 1 .0, 111 • PR. C MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE WATER ALLOWANCE (MAWA): (ETo) x (0.62) x [(ETAF x LA) + ((1-ETAF) x SLA)] (47) x (0.62) x ((0.55 x 16,511.60) + (0.45) x SLA 185,276.90 = 185, 276.90 ESTIMATED TOTAL WATER USE (ETWU): (ETo) x (0.62) x ( [(PF x HA) + SLA ) HYDROZONE 1 LOW WATER USE SHRUBS WITH DRIP IRRIGATION (49.2) x (0.62) x ([(0.3 x 6,564.37) / .81] + 0 ) =40, 196.65 HYDROZONE 2 LOW/MEDIUM WATER USE SHRUBS WITH DRIP IRRIGATION (49.2) x (0.62) x ([(0.5 x 8,181.84) / .811+ 0 ) =100, 202.33 * HYDROZONE 3 MEDIUM WATER USE TREES WITH BUBBLER IRRIGATION (49.2) x (0.62) x ( [(0.5 x 800) / .75] + 0 ) =9, 797.53 HYDROZONE 4 SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA - RECREATIONAL USE LAWN (49.2) x (0.62) + 965.38 ) =23, 941.52 HYDROZONE 5 SPECIAL LANDSCAPE AREA- EDIBLE CITRUS GROVE (49.2) x (0.62) + 866.34 ) =21, 485.23 174, 138.03 ETWU = 174, 138. 03 < MAWA = 185, 276.90 2643 41h Avenue Son Diego CA 92103 phcrie 619.544.1977 ongelinoPosolelo.corn wvmosofelo.corn CRY SUBMIITAL 05.07.18 SCHEMATIC IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET L2.0 L I 251 of 473 PROJECT DIRECTORY: EXHIBIT: TENATIVE MAP NO. CASE FiLE(VO.: G0l704i 6;2c;s,I5 DATE: 6fib/2,1g 29 UNIT CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT FOR 16 AVENUE AND FORMER IM I STREET NATIONAL CITY , CA W tJ 1VI1N34IS3b 1 fi 1a�us 5 111 zI I \ II I I 1 IIII / I` a 3'I 1ri a DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY: SUMMARY OF REQUEST: SIDEWALK 1 RANCH DLAA�10N PORTION OF C ARTEt ECTION 132 — —C— VEILED P~ SIDENITIk" — ) L i ) ) I— \ PAR EU-- _ • t f v PROJECT OWNER: NOEL MEZA RENOVA PROPERTIES, LLC. PO 80X 1265 RANCHO SANTA FE, CA. 92067 TEL. 858-756-8762 EMAIL: nmezol0gmail.com / / PROJECT CONTACT: RALPH GONZALES @ SMS CONSULTING 5931 SEA LION PLACE #109 CARLSBAD, CA. 92010 TEL. 760.522.1026, TEL: 760.331.873E PROJECT TEAM: ARCHITECT: CHRIS COHEN-RICHARDS CCR DESIGNS 10732 ESMERALDAS DRIVE 4' SAN DIEGO, CA 92124 TEL 6194150-9116 EMAIL: ccrdesign45Non.rr.com Bfi� Hrpn4xr naw `I— I— N1P43'09•W-3T4,1 NYDJJE smCADCW- t®ilimmil=blE l7l,1EmEmfiim•. - I:'1 ®ia/rszcor smalj 11 Imo' 11 `�E E'J!'i�EI11IF G`aVJ\� A14NiYLYE V _III R.4sutrr: ane!ea iiiiMai t r� .t EW&WM C•• CRETE OR Gjihl \\\\ \ .• D.G. PATH AND'- PS AREAPLWIEDW/ fENC' ANL�PIAC GPA.15fS BANoTE \ \1 1 ) P )1 ` ,,NATION/,IL SCHOOLD'tSTRI CT SER 1 SITE DATA: i�111U \ i EXISTING USE: EXIST. APPROVED 9 LOT SUBDIVISION (74,487 S.F.) PROPOSED USE 29 SINGLE FAMILY CONDOMINUMS TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: LEGAL: SUBDIVISION MAP 15223 LOTS 1 THRU 9 RECORDED FEBRUARY 23, 2005 ZONING: EXISTING : R5-2 PROPOSED: RM-1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: RESIDENTIAL TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE III / OCCUPANCY: R-2 LOT SIZE: GR055 AREA: 774,487 S.F. / 1.71 AC NET LOT SIZE: BUILDING SIZE: BUILDING TOTAL FLOOR AREA: 41,218 (h1A81TAL) BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 25,660 5,F / .59 ACRES LOT COVERAGE: ALLOWED: X% PROPOSED: X% PAVED AREA: DRIVEWAY: SURFACE PARKING: COVERED PARKING: TOTAL PAVED AREA: LANDSCAPING: REQUIRED: PROPOSED: DENSITY: LOT SIZE: 1,7 ACRES / 74,487 5F MAX 29 UNITS/PROPOSED SETBACKS: STREET: 15 FT. PROVIDE 10 FT SIDE: 10 FT. REAR: 10 FT. BUILDING AREA CALCULATIONS: PRIVATE SPACE REQUIRED 29 UNITS X 60 5F PRIVATE SPACE SHOWN INSTITUTICNAL W/ CE CENTER BUILDING DATA: SHADE SIAUGVRE W7SImew s ND BENCIES UNIT NC. TYPE SIZE (SF) PARKING STYLE PRIVATE SPACE ISM 2 A 1430 2 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 100 5F BALCONY 1 20 SF PATIO 4 Al 1430 1 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 1005F BALCONY 1 CARPORT 4 B 1446 2 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 100 SF BALCONY 100 5F PATIO a Bl 1446 I ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 100 5F BALCONY 2 C 1200 2 CARPORT FLAT 120 5F BALCONY 4 D 1450 1 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 2005F BALCONY 1 CARPORT 2 E 1446 1 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 1205F BALCONY 1 CARPORT F 1450 1 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 1205F BALCONY 1 CARPORT 220 5F PATIO 17405F 2 G 1450 2 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE 1205F BALCONY 4500 5F 220 5F PATIO COMMON SPACE REQUIRED 29 UNITS X3005F= 8700 SF COMMON SPACE PROVIDE ON SITE (3 AREAS X 1200 SF)= 3600 SF DIFFERENCE 51005F 2 GI 1450 1 ATTACHED TOWNHOUSE I205F BALCONY 1 CARPORT 220 SF PATIO AREA GRASSES k2 J/ �%/ 1 1 --- --- CIVIL / SOILS ENGINEER: MEOHI SHARIAT LION PLACE #109 111-7.4.1'0 w. • SMS CONSULTING/SMS GEOTECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. q•Pyj]7 R��z 1 � l�m�nnnIIhil i► 1111111111111111 I/ rr 1 VICINITY MAP: z--7/ ll "� 5931 SEA CARLSBAD, CA. 92010 OFFICE: 760-602-7815 / CELL: 760-331-8738 EMAIL: snngeasol.;n0- gmail.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ~~f� ANGELINA SOTELO SOLETO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS 2643 FOURTH AVENUE SAN DIEGO, CA. 92103 TEL 619.719,1977 EMAIL lina(1osoleto.com ongelina@osolelo.com HYDROLOGIST: OSE GOMEZ JOSE RAUL GOMEZ P.E. 744 PIDGEON STREET SAN DIEGO, CA 92114 TEL. 619.210.3371 I J EMAIL: I,90rn z195878yohoo.com BIOLOGIST: 1� I( VINCENTSCHIE 70 CA. 92122 DT BIOLOGICAL CONSULTANT 3158 OCCIDENTAL STREET /14 of / ) SAN DIEGO, TEL. 858.336.7106 � EMAIL: vince16N n.rr.com LAND SURVEYOR: RAY SPEAR SPEAR 6 ASSOCIATES 475 PRODUCTION STREET SAN MARCOS, CA 92078 TEL: 760-736-2040 EMAIL: rspearOspearinc,net PROJECT ADDRESS: 16TH AVENUE AND M STREET STING WING bvEn �� r A. P. Np® 508 1VISH11N1 NATIONAL CITY, CA 557-352.17 THRU 25 _• LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PR. INL / M AVEA i LOTS I THRU 9 INCLUSIVE; CAROUNA HILLSIDE HOMES MAP NO. 152231N THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY REC9OR0 OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, RECORDED DEC. 13, 2005. PRINTED: 5/8/2018 CITY VILLAGE CONDOS 16th Ave & Old 'M' Street, National City, CA Drawing Number: 1 of 4 Drawing 5631e: SCALE: In = 20' o to VT Orawmg T41e: TENTATIVE MAP -29 UNIT CONDONIMIUM Current Submittal Dare. MAY 10.2018 EXCESS PRIVATE SPACE 4500 SF - 1740 5F = 2760 SF EXCESS PRIVATE SUBSTITUTED FOR COMMON SP / 2760 SF X 2 = 5524 5F LARGER THAN 5100 SF2$ Previous Revisions: 4a 252 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Office of the City Clerk 1243 National City Blvd., National City, California 91950 619-336-4228 phone / 619-336-4229 fax Michael R. Dalla, CMC - City Clerk NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of National City will hold a Public Hearing after the hour of 6:00 p.m., Tuesday, January 22, 2019, in the City Council Chambers, 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA., to consider: CONSIDERATION OF CERTIFICATION OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, ZONE CHANGE AND TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE REZONING OF PROPERTY AT EAST 16TH STREET AND "M" AVENUE FROM SMALL LOT RESIDENTIAL (RS-2) TO MEDIUM -DENSITY MULTI -UNIT RESIDENTIAL (RM-1) IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A 29-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. Anyone interested in this matter may appear at the above time and place and be heard. If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the undersigned, or to the City Council of the City of National City at, or prior to, the Public Hearing. The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing at their meeting of December 3, 2018 and voted to recommend approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map by a vote of six to one. January 9, 2019 ATTACHMENT 7 Michael R. Dalla, CMC City Clerk 29 253 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 254 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Introduction of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City, California, approving a Zone Change from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) for a 29-unit residential development property at property located at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 ZC) (Planning) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 254 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Introduction of an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City, California, approving a Zone Change from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM- 1) for a 29-unit residential development property at property located at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 ZC) PREPARED BY: Martin Reeder, AICP PHONE: 619-336-4313 ,14c DEPARTMENT: Planning. APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: The applicant is proposing to merge nine undeveloped single family lots into one and develop the site with a 29-unit residential condominium project. This type of change requires a Zone Change from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1). The zone change was initiated by the Planning Commission last year. The City Council held a public hearing on the project on January 22, 2019. The attached Ordinance is needed to take action on the Zone Change. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: X FINAL ADOPTION: APPROVED: APPROVED: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Zone Change. Vote: Ayes — Baca, DelaPaz, Garcia, Sendt, Quintero, Yamane Noes: Flores ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 255 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 256 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City amending City Council Policy #901, entitled "Management of Real Property" to clarify procedures for the disposition of surplus real property and for the sale, lease, and rental of City -owned real property. (Housing and Economic Development) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 256 of 473 MEETING DATE: CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City amending City Council Policy #901, entitled "Management of Real Property" to clarify procedures for the disposition of surplus real property and for the sale, lease, and rental of City -owned real property. PREPARED BY: Carlos Aguirre, Housing & DEPARTMENT: Housing & Economic Economic Dev. Manager DevI pmentp PHONE: 619 336-4391 APPROVED __��E EXPLANATION: The City of National City is owner of substantial real property which is used for various municipal purposes. As public service needs change, the requirements for these properties may be revised and, on occasion, certain parcels may be in excess of the City's current need. This requires that each individual site be reviewed in terms of its potential for future public use, as well as its potential economic benefit to the City. It is the purpose of this policy 1) to establish a procedure by which unused and marginally used City -owned real estate is reviewed for its potential public use, and for designating unneeded parcels for lease or sale; 2) to provide methodology for the sale or exchange of City -owned real estate and 3) to establish policies for the leasing and rental of City -owned real property. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: APPROVED: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: N/A Finance ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The amendment to the Policy is not considered a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and is therefore not subject to CEQA. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Policy No. 901 2. Draft Policy No. 901 3. Resolution 257 of 473 Attachment No. 1 CITY COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF NATIONAL CITY TITLE: Sale of Surplus Real Property POLICY # 901 ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: August 14,1990 Purpose To establish a policy and procedure for the sale of surplus pro erty and use of the proceeds from that sale. Policy The following steps are to be followed to sale City -owned pie s of e • 1. Obtain other City Departments' comments for the sa` of the property. 2. Secure preliminary title reports for the property. 3. Prepare plats and legal descriptio for the property. 4. Request the City Council (Real Estate committee) to declare the property surplus and direct the staff to sell it. 5. If applicable, send a written offer to sell or lease the property to the other government agencies (Goverment Code Section 54222). 6. Order a letter of appraisal for the property from a licensed appraiser. 7. Order CLTA title insurance policy for the property to be sold. 8. Prepare the advertising and bid packages for the marketable properties, and request the City Council's approval to proceed with the advertisement of the marketable properties. 9. Advertise the sale of marketable properties. 10. Prepare a final report to the City Council providing information on the results of the bid opening or the negotiations. 11. Obtain approval from the City Council to enter into an escrow to sell the property. Unless otherwise specified in the offer, or in the bid package, the City will open a normal escrow where the City will pay for the cost of the title insurance, and one-half of the escrow fee. Page 1 of 2 258 of 473 Attachment No. 1 TITLE: Sale of Surplus Real Property POLICY # 901 ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: August 14,1990 The proceeds from the sale will be spent on beautification or improvement projects throughout the City. Related Policy References None Page 2 of 2 259 of 473 Attachment No. 2 CITY COUNCIL POLICY CITY OF NATIONAL CITY TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19,1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 Background: The City of National City is owner of substantial real property which is used for various municipal purposes. As public service needs change, the requirements for these properties may be revised and, on occasion, certain parcels may be in excess of the City's current need. This requires that each individual site be reviewed in terms of its potential for future public use, as well as its potential economic benefit to the City - r. The proceeds from the sale and lease of City -owned lands and the revet es generated from leases are normally utilized for General Fund purposes unless the property sold or leased belonged to a restricted progr Purpose: It is the purpose of this policy 1) to establish a procedure by which unused and marginally used City -owned real estate is reviewed for its potential public use, and for designating unneeded parcels for lease or sale; 2) to provide methodology for the sale or exchange of City -owned real estate and 3) to establish policies for the leasing of City - owned real property. Policy ASP It is the City's policy to manage its real estate assets so that municipal needs which rely on these assets may be properly implemented. It is not the City's policy to speculate in real estate. The City Council will review City -owned real estate not used for municipal purposes and determine the appropriate use of the property. Those properties not needed for either City or public use within the foreseeable future, may be made available for lease or sale. The City shall optimize the sale price or lease rent from City -owned real estate based on relevant factors, including 1) an appraisal reflecting current market value when either a transaction or authorization to sell or lease is presented to the City Council, 2) prevailing economic conditions and market trends, and 3) any special benefits to accrue from the sale or lease. The City shall seek market value for its properties. Discounts will not be negotiated unless an extraordinary need or circumstance is recognized by Council Resolution setting forth the amount of the discount from appraised value and the public purpose served in justification of the discount. Page 1 of 13 260 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 City staff under the direction of City Manager shall prepare and present to the City Council a comprehensive Property Management Plan with periodic reviews as needed, and updates to the City Council. The Property Management Plan shall include an overall review of the City's real estate portfolio (or inventory), an operating plan for corporate property, a disposition plan for surplus property, market research to support anticipated transactions and a request for authority to act within defined parameters (as described in this policy). The major elements of the property management plan are to include' • Property evaluation and characterization of real estate assets • Strategy for City occupied real estate • Investment Portfolio Plan (leases to for -profit ten.: ®_ts) • Review of not -for -profit leases • Disposition Plan for surplus assets • Business Case development review to support ► _ c. sed transactions • Legal document development and review Procedure for sale of City owned Real A. Real Estate Review As part of an overall property management plan for the City's real estate assets, staff will review the City's property inventory to determine which properties are no longer needed for public facilities or to support the elements of the General Plan and whose disposition will provide a greater public benefit. A City -owned property may become available for sale if: • The property is not currently used by the City or does not support a municipal function. • The property is vacant and has no foreseeable use by the City. • The property is a non -performing or under -performing asset and greater value can be generated by its sale. • Significant economic development opportunities can be generated by selling the property. Factors to be considered in determining whether a property should be sold include: • Will the City be relieved of potential liabilities and/or cost of maintaining property that does not generate income or provide public benefit? • Property tax increment that will be created by returning the properties to the tax rolls. Page 2 of 13 261 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 • Stimulation of the economy by providing opportunities for private sector investment. • Generation of revenue. • The sale of the property will generate greater economic value than a ground lease, if a ground lease is a feasible option. B. Governmental Clearance Process Government Code Section 54222 requires that a local agency proposing to dispose of surplus property must first notify all governmental agencies operating within the City as to the availability of the property. The agencies are given 60 days to respond with an intent to acquire, if not, the property may be deemed cleared for public sale. Regarding the list of properties for sale: • Governmental agencies are regularly contacted as the surplus list is updated. • City departments are individualivicontacted as the surplus list is updated. • Council members are given a preliminary review and opp9jtunity to comment on foreseeable uses for the property. C. Approval Process • City -owned properties that have been identified bq'the City Manager as candidates for sale will be presented to the City Council for approval to be sold. If a property is of a type and location that would make a ground lease feasible, an economic analysis of the benefits of lease vs. sale will be conducted. • If City Council determines that the property may be sold, it shall authorize City Manager to sell the property for a price equal to or greater than a minimum price established by a current (less than six months old) appraisal. The authorization to sell the property will be valid for twelve months from the date of City Council action. • The City Manager or designee may enter into purchase and sale agreements, close escrows and execute and deliver grant deeds to the purchasers of the properties at prices equal to or greater than the minimum price approved by City Council on terms and conditions deemed reasonable, and in the City's best interests. • City Manager or designee will provide a report to the City Council, regarding the price, terms, and conditions of all transactions. • Properties that cannot be sold at a price equal to or greater than the minimum price approved by Council will be returned to Council for further consideration prior to disposition. Council approval will be required to sell a property at a price less than the minimum price previously approved by the City Council. Page 3of13 262 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 D. Method of Sale Properties may be sold by any method allowed by City Council Policy. This includes direct negotiation, request for proposal, listing with a broker, sealed bid, auction or other appropriate method as determined by the City Council. Possible method of sale for all properties will be included in the enabling resolution authorizing their sales. E. Marketing Properties offered for sale shall receive the widest possible exposure to the open market place. This may be accomplished through direct marketing techniques, such as requests for proposals (RFPs), advertising, exposure through the real estate media, posting the property on the multiple listing service or any other appropriate method. When appropriate, properties may be listed for sale with qualified real estate brokers. The authorization to utilize the services of a real estate broker will be contained in the enabling resolution. F. Real Estate Brokers Real estate brokers may be used to represent the City n tie sale of its properties. Brokers will be selected for individual assignments through Requests for Proposals (RFP) or Requests for Qualifications (RFQ) and a subsequent bid or other methods that result in the City receiving the services of a qualified broker at the best value to the City. The maximum approved commission rate will be contained in the enabling resolution for the property's sale. If the property is listed with a broker, the City reserves the right to exclude from the listing agreement potential buyers whose interest in purchasing a subject property has been made a part of the record prior to the execution of such agreement. G. Exclusively Negotiated Sales It will be the City's policy to insure the highest price for its real estate by pursuing open market transactions. However, on certain occasions, an exclusively negotiated sale may be justified as applicable and may be approved under one of the following conditions: 1. When a parcel is landlocked. 2. When the sale is to a contiguous owner. 3. When a fee interest in a pipeline or other right-of-way is no longer required, it may be sold to a contiguous owner. A restrictive pipeline easement of adequate width or other required easements will be reserved from said sale. 4. When other governmental, public and quasi -public agencies submit acquisition proposals a sale may be consummated. These agencies shall include but not be limited to: Federal, State, and County agencies; school districts, special districts, and regulated utility companies. Page 4 of 13 263 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 5. When qualified non-profit institutional organizations offer to purchase City -owned land, a negotiated sale may be consummated at fair market value providing there is: 1) a development commitment, and 2) a right to repurchase or a reversion upon a condition subsequent. Institutional organizations such as places of public assembly, hospitals, extended care facilities, private schools and community service organizations are required to develop under the City's conditional use permit procedure. 6. When a property has been offered by public auction and no acceptable bids were received, it may be sold on a negotiated basis to any applicant submitting an acceptable offer within six months following the date of auction.' 7. Real property exchanges may be consummated b direct negotiation. However, exchanges will be considered only with other governmental agencies or when there is an advantage to the City. H. Rezoning Prior to completion of the sales transaction, City land shall be considered for rezoning in accordance with the General Plan, existing community plans or other City Council direction if a higher sale price will result. Also, all unnecessary easements affecting title to the property shall e removed if this will result in a commensurate increase in value. I. Easements The City will receive current fair market value for the removal of restrictive easements or access rights previously paid for by the City or other governmental agency or reserved in a sale of City property. J. Priority Handling Since time is of essenc staff shall be given the land transactions, all such actions by the City Council and est priority and special handling. K. Public Utilities Installed by Private Entities The applicant for the use of unimproved City land for public purposes, such as streets, sewers, and other public utilities, shall compensate the City for the fair market value of the rights to be granted by the City. The amount of compensation shall be established by appraisal. Procedure for leasing City -owned Real Property The City of National City has a very diverse real estate portfolio. While the policies herein are to act as the standard that governs most leases, the City acknowledges that parts of its leasing portfolio have specialized needs or restrictions. In these cases, this policy will act as a framework for a sub -policy that will govern a specific area. Should a Page 5 of 13 264 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) POLICY # 901 ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 conflict arise between the framework policy and the sub -policy, the sub -policy will govern. A. Criteria for Leasing A City property shall be considered for leasing when one or more ofhe following criteria apply: 1. The property is not required for current municipal use, but is to be held for possible future use and can be leased as an interim measure. 2. The property can only be leased because of legal restraints. For example, property held under Tideland trust grants or as dedicated parks. 3. The City requires substantial control overdevelopment, use and reuse of the property. 4. The property has the immediate potential of a high return to the City because of its high demand and type of use, such as commercial and industrial land. 5. The property can be efficiently utilized by a provider of services needed by the City. 6. The property can be leased to promote a substantial economic development opportunity. B. Property Mana ement Plan The City Council may approve the execution of lease transactions that meet the terms of the City's asset strategy for a particular property previously approved by City Council in an overall Property Management Plan. Negotiated transactions that fall outside of the parameters of an approved Property Management Plan either will be submitted individually for City Council approval, or deferred until the next periodic update and approval of the plan. Y C. Lessee Selection for New Leases Competitive offers for lease of City property shall be solicited from the open market place. This may be accomplished through a number of marketing techniques, such as Request for Proposals (RFPs), a marketing subscription system, direct advertising, use of a Multiple Listing Service (MLS), listing with a broker, posting the property and any other appropriate means. In certain limited situations, the City may exclusively consider a single proposal for lease of City property. Potential lessees wishing to exclusively negotiate with the City must submit for City staff review a business case with sufficient justification as to how it is capable of optimizing the use of the property and return to the City, thereby negating the need for a competitive process. This information will be included when the lease transaction is presented for City Council approval. Page 6 of 13 265 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 Leasehold proposals shall be evaluated in terms of: 1. The degree to which the proposed use is in compliance with the City's strategic plan for the property. 2. In terms of the amount of consideration offered in the form of rent. 3. In terms of the financial feasibility of the proposal. 4. The capability, expertise and experience of the potential lessee with respect to the proposed leasehold development and operation. r 5. If new development is proposed, a development plan that i es a description of the development team and its qualifications. 6. The details of each person or entity that will have an interest in th- posed lease 7. Special public benefits to be derived (if any). D. Rate of Return The City shall obtain fair market rents for its leases commensurate with the highest and best use of the property. The fair market rent shall be based on anwpraisal that complies with the definition of Market Rent found in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP) published by the Appraisal Foundation. The appraisal shall be no more than six months old at the time the lease transaction is presented for City Council approval. If the cost of an appraisal is not justified by the anticipated rents, the City may choose an alternative method to establish rent. City leases shall contain terms and conditions which will lsustain a fair rate of return throughout the duration of the lease. E. Rental Terms Rental terms may be negotiated on the basis of fixed rates (flat rent leases) or percentages of the lessee's gross income derived from business conducted on the property, with a provision for a minimum rent on percentage leases. F. Percentage Leases Minimum Rent The minimum rent component for a new percentage lease shall be set at no less than eighty percent (80%) of the fair market rent as defined above. In certain cases, a portion of the minimum rent may be abated for new construction or redevelopment on the leasehold. The minimum rent shall be adjusted upward throughout the duration of the lease at intervals of not more than every five (5) years to reflect no less than eighty percent (80%) of the average annual rent actually paid or accrued during the three (3) years preceding the adjustment. In no event shall the adjusted minimum rent be less than the minimum rent in existence immediately preceding the adjustment. Page 7 of 13 266 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 Percentage Rates Percentage leases shall provide for adjustments of percentages rates every five (5) years to current fair market rates as established by appraisals of prevailing market percentage rates primarily within the Southern California r; a. G. Flat Rate Leases Market Rate Adjustments Flat rate leases shall provide for upward a current fair market rent. Consumer Price Index Adjustments Flat rate leases shall provide for upward adjustment of rent in the interval term between market rate adjustments by changes in the consumer price index. The index used for consumer price index adjustments will be the All Urban Consumers index for Los Angeles - Riverside - Orange County, California with a base year of 1982-84. If the U.S. Department of Labor indices are no longer published, another substitute index generally recognized as authoritative will be used. Flat rate leases may include pre -determined periodic increases to rent instead of consumer price index adjustments. These periodic increases would occur at least every five5) years. t of rent e = five (5) years to H. Rent Arbitration Leases can provide for binding arbitration when the City and lessee cannot agree on the new rent for a rental period under review. The City and lessee shall each select a professional independent real estate appraiser who in turn will select a third independent real estate appraiser to determine the fair market rent. If the two selected appraisers fail to mutually select a third appraiser, then the third appraiser will be appointed in accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association. The City and lessee shall pay the cost of its own selected appraiser and equally share the cost of the third appraiser. I. Appraisal Assumptions City leases shall include a definition of the fair market value to be used to adjust rent and an identification of the premise for that value. In establishing the fair market value of leased property, any appraisal shall consider the property as a fee simple absolute estate and as vacant and available for lease or sale for the authorized purposes of the lease at the commencement of the rental period under review. Rates established for purposes of periodic percentage rental adjustments shall not consider any abatement as may be appropriate in a "new" development of vacant land. It shall also be assumed that all Page 8 of 13 267 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 required regulatory approvals to permit the use authorized in the lease have been obtained. J. Lease Term Short -Term Lease The City Manager, at all times, shall have power, without advertising, notice, or competitive bidding, to lease any City property for a term of three (3) years or less (short-term lease). The City Council will be notified of a short-term lease not later than fifteen (15) days following its execution. A short-term lease may not be renewed without approval of the City Council. The City Manager, or designee may also execute rental agreements covering up to eighteen (18) ` months for tenant occupancy of City -owned residential housing. Long -Term Lease A lease in excess of three (3) years requires a resolution passed by a majority vote of all members of the City Council. The length of lease term shall be based on the level of capital improvements to be made by the lessee and the economic life expectancy of the development. These factors can be determined utilizing cost estimating and economic life expectancy resources such as tables provided by Marshall Valuation Service. The City may consider other relevant information in determining if a longer lease term is warranted, such as if the proposed leasehold development is expected to generate above average returns to the City or significantly improve the quality of the property. A lease shall not exceed 55 years unless the conditions setaforth in Government Code section 37380(b) are met, K. Lease Amendments Amendments to long-term leases require City Council approval. The City's agreement to an amendment may be contingent upon updating sections of the lease to incorporate current City standard lease provisions and an adjustment to fair market rent. L. Subleases A lessee may sublease all or part of the leased property to a qualified sub -lessee subject to approval by the City. No sublease shall be approved which would be detrimental to the City's rights under the master lease or for a use that is not consistent with uses allowed by the master lease. The City Manager may authorize subleases which meet these conditions and which do not require amendment of the master lease. Unless special circumstances Page 9 of 13 268 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) POLICY # 901 ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 exist. Leases shall provide for the City to receive a minimum of fifty percent (50%) of the incremental gross rental revenues due to the lessee from subleases. M. Leasehold Financing The City will not subordinate its fee interest to encumbrances placed against any leasehold by a lessee. The City Council may approve appropriate financial encumbrances of the leasehold interest, which provide that all loan proceeds are used for authorized improvement of the property until the leasehold is fully developed in accordance with the lease. City staff shall take appropriate steps to review the proposed financing and insure that loan proceeds go into the leasehold. Maximum loan proceeds shall not be in excess of seventy-five percent (75%) loan -to -value, where "value" refers to the leasehold improvements, as determined by a lender's appraisal which has been reviewed and approved by City staff. The loan term shall not exceed the term of the lease. Loans or refinancing in the form of encumbrances against the lease for the purpose of reducing equity or financing the sale of leasehold interest will not be allowed until the property is fully developed for uses authorized in the lease. After the property is developed, such financing may be permitted so long as there is also substantial benefit to be gained by the City. This may take the form of either a percentage share of the loan proceeds or an upward adjustment to the rent. Either of which shall be based on commercially reasonabl e omp rabies found in the market. N. Leasehold Improvements Leasehold improvements installed by lessees shall be removed at the lease termination without cost to the City, or will revert to the City, at the City's option. All leasehold improvements and alterations require prior written approval of the City Council. O. Maintenance and Utilities Responsibility City leases shall require the lessee to maintain all improvements on the property at its own expense and be responsible for the cost of all utilities. Leases for multi -tenanted space shall include specific requirements delineating appropriate responsibilities. P. Lease Audits All percentage leases may be audited by the City's Finance Department in the first year of operation to establish proper reporting procedures and at least once every three (3) years thereafter. More frequent audits may be made if appropriate. The City shall reserve the right to audit all other leases and agreements subject to this Council Policy, if determined to be warranted by the City's Finance Department. Page l0 of 13 269 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19,1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 Q. Leasehold Assignments Requests for assignment of leasehold interest shall be evaluated on the same basis as the criteria used in evaluating a leasehold proposal. The City Manager may authorize assignments which do not require amendment of the master lease. Consent may be contingent on the payment of additional consideration to the City, either as a percentage share of the purchase price of the leasehold interest or an upward adjustment to the rent. Either of which shall be based on commercially reasonable comparables found in the market. If new financing is involved in the sale, the requirements of 'Leasehold Financing' shall apply. R. Lease Extensions & Renewals •A> Requests from existing lessees for lease extensions or renewals may be considered if such proposals promote capital investment and redevelopment of City property. Whenever an existing lessee is seeking renewal of an expiring long-term lease that is not contemplated in a previously approved property management plan, the City Manager will bring the issue before the applicable City Council Committee with an appropriate recommendation. In addition to the criteria used to assess new lease proposals, City staff also will review the lessee's history with respect to: maintenance of the property; compliance with existing lease terms; prompt rent payments; and a rental return consistent with maximizing the property's full potential. r The lessee must propose capital investment that: will increase the value or the useful life of the leasehold improvements by an amount more than can be reasonably amortized over the remaining lease term; is not recurring in nature; and is at least ten percent (10%) or more of the value of the existing improvements. It specifically should exclude expenditures to correct deferred maintenance and expenditures for repairs to keep the existing improvements in good condition. The length of any extended lease term shall be calculated by the same method used for calculating the length of new leases. S. City's Interest in Leasehold Improvements City lease agreements provide the City the right to assume ownership of the leasehold improvements at the end of the lease. The value of the City's interest in the leasehold improvements can be appraised using widely accepted appraisal methods. In the event the City grants a lessee a lease extension, the City shall be compensated by an amount equal to the change in present value attributable to the deferral of its interest in the leasehold improvements. This amount either can be paid as an upfront payment at the beginning of the extended term or amortized over time with appropriate interest applied. The City shall offset from the value of its interest in the leasehold improvements any increased economic benefit derived from an extended lease. The City shall not receive any Page 11 of 13 270 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 compensation for its interest in the leasehold improvements on leases extended prior to the last twenty percent (20%) of the existing term. T. Leasing to Non- Profit Organizations It shall be the policy of the City Council to allow direct negotiation with nonprofit organizations for the use of City -owned lands for the purpose of providing the community with cultural, recreational, educational enrichment, and other public services to the citizens and visitors of National City. Relative to this policy the following will apply: 1. Available City property shall be leased at fair market value to nonprofit organizations when it is deemed by Council that appropriate public benefit will be derived. 2. The only discount in the land rental rate which will be considered is that which will be a direct offset to City expenditures. An example would be where the non- profit organization is constructing and operating a facility to provide a service that would otherwise be a recognized obligation of the City to provide. 3. Council approval of a prospective nonprofit organization's use of City -owned land shall be obtained prior to commencement of lease negotiations. 4. No lease will become effective until firm financial commitments have been obtained under an appropriate lease option arrangement. 5. Lessees will be required to construct, operate, and maintain the premises at their sole cost. 6. Lessees shall be incorporated nonprofit organizations under the laws of the State of California. 7. Development on parklands shall be in conformance with City park development plans, and construction shall comply with City park design criteria. 8. Lessees shall provide desired services and facilities to the general public without discrimination as to race, color, creed, sex, age, or national origin. 9. When leases permit revenue producing activities, some measure of rental compensation shall be paid to the City. However, this provision will not apply to occasional fund raising events provided the funds are used exclusively for the specified purpose(s) of the lease. 10. Properties with significant potential for commercial, industrial, or scientific research uses shall not be available for nonprofit use. 11. Subleases will be considered on their individual merits by the City and consistency with conditions placed upon the City. Fees generated from subleasing will belong to the City and be deposited with the City upon receipt by the Agency. Page 12 of 13 271 of 473 Attachment No. 2 TITLE: Management of Real Property POLICY # 901 (Sale, Lease, Rental, Surplus) ADOPTED: June 19, 1984 AMENDED: January 22, 2019 U. Security Deposits The standard security deposit for a new lease agreement shall be equivalent to two (2) month's rent. The security deposit may take the form of cash, an instrument of credit or a faithful performance bond. For a lessee making a substantial investment in improvements, the security deposit will be refunded up completion of the improvements. Related Policy References Government Codes: 37350 and 37380 Government Codes: 54200-54232, 54235-54237 Prior Policy Amendments August 14, 1990 Page 13 of 13 272 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 273 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, making a Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) in order to construct a 29-unit residential development and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 IS) (Planning) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 273 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, California, making a Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue from Small Lot Residential (RS-2) to Medium -Density Multi -Unit Residential (RM-1) in order to construct a 29-unit residential development and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Determination. (Applicant: Ralph Gonzales) (Case File No. 2017-04 IS) PREPARED BY: Martin Reeder, AICP PHONE: 619-336-4313 ,(4c DEPARTMENT: Planning. APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: The applicant is proposing to merge nine undeveloped single family lots into one and develop the site with a 29-unit residential condominium project. The site includes the westerly half of the vacated portion of "M" Avenue adjacent to the east of the properties. In order to build this type of project, the existing single-family zoning needs to be changed to a multi -family land use and zone. All discretionary projects require compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), analysis of which is contained in the attached background report. Staff recommends that the City Council certify the attached Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the 29-unit residential condominium project. Analysis of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map are contained in a separate report. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: APPROVED: APPROVED: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended certification of the MND. Vote: Ayes — Baca, DelaPaz, Garcia, Sendt, Quintero, Yamane Noes: Flores ATTACHMENTS: 1. Background Report 2. CEQA Checklist and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 3. Recommended Findings 4. Resolution 1274 of 4731 BACKGROUND REPORT Executive Summary The applicant is proposing to merge nine undeveloped single family Tots into one and develop the site with a 29-unit residential condominium project. The site includes the westerly half of the vacated portion of "M" Avenue adjacent to the east of the properties. In order to build this type of project, the existing single-family zoning needs to be changed to a multi -family land use and zone. All discretionary projects require compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), analysis of which is contained in this background report. Environmental Analysis Impacts related to multi -unit residential projects usually focus on traffic and neighborhood impacts. In this case, because the project site is undeveloped and still in its natural state, impacts related to habitat are also considered. In order to analyze any potential impacts resulting from the development, a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) checklist (Initial Study) was prepared. Based on the analyses presented in the attached CEQA checklist, it is concluded that the project (a) would not: have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, impact the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory; (b) would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable; and (c) would not have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. No significant impacts to the environment, as a result of this project, have been identified. While there is a small amount of sensitive plant habitat on site (see discussion below), any impacts are able to be mitigated to less than significant. Approval of the project is not expected to have any significant impacts, either long-term or short-term, nor will it cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. As such, it is expected that project implementation would have no impact with respect to these mandatory findings of significance. Because of the mitigation required, the CEQA document converts to a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND). The City established a 30-day public review and comment period from September 7, 2018 to October 8, 2018. During this period, the CEQA checklist (Initial Study or "IS") was available for review. A Notice of Intent (NOI) for the MND was posted in three locations at City Hall and at the National City Public Library. The 30-day review was ATTACHMENT 1 275 of 473 required (as opposed to a 20-day review period) due to the MND needing to be routed to the State Clearinghouse (Office of Planning and Research) for review. This was due to one of the Responsible Agencies being a State Agency (Department of Fish and Wildlife, or DFW). Comments provided by DFW resulted in mitigation measures, which are discussed in the following sections. MND analysis In the CEQA checklist, there are four possible impacts: "Potentially Significant Impact", "Less Than Significant w/Mitigation Incorporation", "Less Than Significant Impact", and "No Impact". Of the 18 sections on the checklist, three sections (Cultural Resources, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Hydrology/Water Quality) had checkmarks for "Less Than Significant Impact", and one section (Biological Resources) had checkmarks for "Less Than Significant [with] Mitigation Incorporation". The remaining 14 sections noted "No Impact". Cultural Resources — There is one previously recorded cultural resource within a half - mile radius of the project area and two previously recorded historical structures within a half -mile radius of the project area. Due to the number of cultural resources recorded within a half -mile radius of the project area, there is a low likelihood of encountering unrecorded cultural resources within the project area. However, the presence of additional resources cannot be ruled out until a systematic survey is conducted. State and federal law requires that if any cultural resources are found during construction, work is to stop and the lead agency and a qualified archaeologist be consulted to determine the importance of the find and its appropriate management. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains during construction, the applicant is required to take all appropriate steps as required by relevant federal, state, and local laws. Conditions address these steps. Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) —The project's GHG emissions would occur over the short construction duration, and would consist primarily of emissions from equipment exhaust. There would also be long-term regional emissions associated with project -related new vehicular trips and indirect source emissions, such as energy usage. The existing density in the area would allow up to 15 residential units. Approval of the project would allow 29 units. The 14 additional units could be reasonably estimated to generate 82 additional average daily trips (ADT). This amount does not trigger any threshold for a focused traffic study or traffic impact analysis. As such, although the project would contribute to airborne pollutants, this project will have a less than significant impact on air quality. 2 276 of 473 Hydrology/Water Quality — The onsite drainage is considered as Freshwater Emergent Wetland, which qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters. State and federal permitting to allow this drainage to be impacted will be required by the US Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All required permits or related authorizations for the project related to impacting wetlands/waters are a condition of project approval and part of the Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP), which outlines the mitigation identified in the MND. These permits will need to be secured prior to any development activities taking place. Grading and development of the project will direct all runoff into drainage facilities located on site and will not flow on to adjacent properties. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. Comments The NOI elicited comments from one agency, the Department of Fish and Wildlife (DFW). Coordination with the Department included communication with both the state and federal offices of DFW. Habitat impacts and mitigation measures The site contains predominantly non-native vegetation, or noxious species. There is approximately one acre of predominantly non-native grassland, which covers the majority of the site. However, there are small patches of Native Grassland, indicated by Purple Needlegrass (Stipa pulchra), which are found within the larger weedy non-native grassland. Native Grassland is a sensitive habitat -type of significant biological resource value. Throughout California, grassland ecosystems host approximately 90% of the species listed in the Inventory of Rare and Endangered Species in California. Impacts to native and non-native grasslands will be mitigated off site. The attached Mitigation, Monitoring, and Reporting Program (MMRP) requires mitigation of Impacts to native grasslands (e.g., grasslands having at least 10% native cover) at a minimum of 2:1 ratio and non-native grasslands at a 1:1 ratio. There is a patch of several hundred specimens of San Diego Ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) located at the northern end of the property. This is a high -profile sensitive species. Project conditions require mitigation in the form of salvage and transplantation. Where impacts to San Diego ambrosia cannot be avoided, the approval of a translocation plan prior to initiating ground disturbing activities is required. The translocation plan shall specify: 1) the methods used for translocation (e.g., timing of translocation, seed collection, soil retention, etc.); 2) the location and suitability of the receptor site; 3) a long-term management plan for the receptor site; and 4) a long-term funding mechanism. The translocation receptor site should have long-term conservation value, be contiguous with other large, conserved tracts of land, and be managed and protected in perpetuity. The translocation plan will be submitted for review and approval 3 277 of 473 by DFW. Giant Wild Reed (Anmdo donax) is a noxious invasive that fills the eroded gully running through the eastern edge of the property. This has displaced most native riparian elements that would grow in this location under other circumstances. This habitat is of no biological resource value. It should be noted that the gully is likely the result of erosion of a man-made ditch, which was cut in order to install utilities. The project was abandoned and the ditch remained. Nevertheless, this onsite drainage is considered as Freshwater Emergent Wetland, which qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters. National City's General Plan Policy OS-2.2 states the following: "Preserve the ecological integrity of creek corridors, canals, and drainage ditches that support riparian resources by working with California Department of Fish and Game to establish a plant palette that is satisfactory and providing for up to 100-foot buffers that protect against development impacts but allow for existing uses and limited future recreational uses." However, as noted above, the area is dominated by a noxious invasive of no biological resource value that has displaced any riparian habitat that might otherwise be located here. Therefore, the gully is not considered to have any ecological integrity in need of preservation. Because the eroded gully qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters, state and federal permitting to allow this drainage to be impacted will be required by the US Army Corps, local Regional Water Quality Control Board, and DFW. All required permits or related authorizations for the project related to impacting wetlands/waters are conditions of project approval and will need to be secured prior to any development activities taking place. In order to prevent intrusion by exotic species, the landscape design and planting palette will use native plants to the greatest extent feasible in landscaped areas. The Project applicant shall not plant, seed, or otherwise introduce invasive exotic plant species to landscaped areas adjacent and/or near native habitat areas. Exotic plant species not to be used include those species listed on the California Invasive Plant Council's (Cal-IPC) Invasive Plant Inventory. This list includes (but is not limited to) the following: pepper trees, pampas grass, fountain grass, ice plant, myoporum, black locust, capeweed, tree of heaven, periwinkle, sweet alyssum, English ivy, French broom, Scotch broom, and Spanish broom. 4 278 of 473 In order to prevent potential impacts regarding the spread of invasive species during vegetation clearing activities, prior to any such work being undertaken all new equipment introduced to the project area shall be cleaned, and all equipment shall be maintained daily. All the above requirements are included in recommended conditions, as well as in the MMRP. With mitigation of the native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, the project impacts will be less than significant. No other comments were received in relation to the public hearing for the Planning Commission meeting. The notice was routed to all property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the project. A copy of the MND and MMRP were mailed, in addition to the public notice, to the following jurisdictions/agencies: • California Regional Water Quality Control Board • Fair Housing Council of San Diego • California State Clearinghouse • Sweetwater Authority • Department of Fish and Wildlife • National School District • Sweetwater Union High School District • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers • California Native American Heritage Commission Findings for certification of the MND There are four findings for certification of the environmental document: 1. That the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, While there is plant habitat on site in the form of native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project provides for mitigation that will reduce potential impacts to a level of less than significance. 5 279 of 473 2. That the project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The project is an infill development on a historically vacant property. The area is surrounded by urban development. The existing improvements and development pattern can accommodate the project without causing any impacts to the environment or to existing services. 3. That the project does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The project is a residential development designed to provide a safe living environment for people. In addition, in excess of the required landscaped open space is provided, providing screening from adjacent uses, recreation space, and an offset for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions. 4. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with CEQA for which an MND has been prepared. The MND has determined that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment without mitigation, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the MMRP included as part of the certified MND reduce the impact to a less than significant level with mitigation incorporated. Options The options with regard to the environmental clearance for this project are either to certify the MND based on the attached findings or to file the report. In the latter case, the MND would not be certified and the associated General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Tentative Subdivision Map would not be approved. Staff is in support of the application and certification of the MND. In addition, the Planning Commission recommended certification of the MND as part of their recommendation to approve the project. 6 280 of 473 11/8/18 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 1. PROJECT TITLE/PROJECT #: 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S - General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16th Street and "M" Avenue in order to construct a 29-unit residential development. 2. LEAD AGENCY: Contact: Phone: 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: 5. ZONING DESIGNATION: City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Martin Reeder, AICP — Acting Planning Director (619) 336-4313 Northwest comer of East 16th Street and "M" Avenue, National City, CA 91950 White Star Capital LLC. Small Lot Residential (RS-2) 6. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant wishes to .amend the General Plan land use designation to change the subject property from Low -Medium Density Residential to Medium Density Residential, and to change the zoning designation from RS-2 (Small Lot Residential) to RM-1 (Medium Density Multi -Unit Residential) in order to develop a 29-unit condominium development. 7. SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING: The project site is comprised of nine existing single-family lots, all of which are vacant, and 451 feet of the half width (30 feet) of "M" Avenue to the east, which was recently vacated. The.whole project area is approximately 74,500 square feet in size, or roughly 1.7 acres, and is undeveloped. The area slopes down from East 16th Street to South Bay Plaza (south to north) and from west to east, to form a rough valley shape. There is an existing single-family neighborhood to the west, which is located behind a large hill; there is an existing mixed -density neighborhood of duplexes and triplexes located across East 16th Street to the south; South Bay Plaza is located to the north, beyond an existing grove of trees at the bottom of the valley area; the National School District offices and bus yard is located to the east, on the other side of the former "M" Avenue, which is considered a "paper street" (the street is shown on the Assessor's Parcel Map but was never developed as a street). 7 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S, IS ATTACHMENT 2 SCH#2018091023 281 of 473 Initial Study- Page 2 of 19 8. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): US Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY All The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or is "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated -b_y_the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture and Forestry Resources E Air Quality El Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology / Soils ❑ Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology / Water Quality 0 Land Use / Planning 0 Mineral Resources ❑ Noise ❑ Population / Housing ❑ Public Services 0 Recreation 0 Transportation / Traffic ❑ Utilities / Service Systems 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this Initial Evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the proj ect. A NIITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or is "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effect that remains to be addressed. Signature (/JN.------------ Date a (g. /fg Printed Name: Martin Reeder, AICP R Title: Principal Planner 282 of 473 Initial Study - Page 3 of 19 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off -site as well as on - site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. - 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence than an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less than Significant w/ Mitigation Incorporated" applied where the incorporation of a mitigation measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to "Less then Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This in only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whichever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 9 283 of 473 Initial Study - Page 4 of 19 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources I — AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Sources: 1, 2,3) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime Views in the area? (Sources: 1,2,3) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ X X ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ ❑ x The project site is a sloping vacant lot in its natural state covered with short grass and scrub. The property is surrounded by existing urban development, including a bus storage lot to the east and a commercial shopping center parking lot to the north. There is a mix of low and mid -density housing locate to the south and west. There are no scenic vistas or resources in the area that would be affected by the project. The existing visual character is low due to the existing mostly industrial uses surround the site. The development of the property would generally improve the existing sloping grass lot with the construction of a quality medium density condominium development including significant landscaping and open space areas. The design of the development would include compliance with all lighting design standards in the Municipal Code, which will ensure no light or glare impacts on adjacent properties. II — AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation & Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 10 284 of 473 Initial Study - Page 5 of 19 a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) ❑ ❑ X The City of National City does not contain farmland or agricultural resources, forest land, nor any land zoned for agricultural use. As such, approval of this project will have no impact on such lands or resources. III — AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ C ❑ A 11 285 of 473 Initial Study - Page 6 of 19 The City does not have any applicable air quality plan or standards that would apply in this case. Air quality is under the purview of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. The County of San Diego and National City are in attainment for all California Clean Air Act (CCAA) pollutants with the exception of ozone. Approval of this project will not conflict with or obstruct the implementation of the San Diego County Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) to manage air quality in our region. The existing density in the area would allow up to 15 residential units. Approval of the project would allow 29 units. The 14 additional units could be reasonably estimated to generate 82 additional average daily trips (ADT). This amount does not trigger any threshold for a focused traffic study or traffic impact analysis. As such, overall, approval of this project will have a less than significant impact on air quality. IV — BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 5) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 7) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Sources: 6, 7) d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Sources: 5) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Sources: 1) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Sources: 1) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation X ❑ X ❑ X X ❑ ❑ ❑ x X There are no species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. With regard to plant habitats, the site contains predominantly non-native vegetation, or noxious species. There is approximately one (1) acre of predominantly non-native grassland, which covers the majority of the site. However, there are small patches of Native Grassland, indicated by Purple Needlegrass (Stipa pulchra), 12 286 of 473 Initial Study - Page 7 of 19 which are found within the larger weedy non-native grassland. Native Grassland is a sensitive habitat -type, of significant biological resource value. In addition, throughout California, grassland ecosystems host approximately 90% of the species listed in the Inventory of Rare and Endangered Species in California (Barry, 2006). Impacts to native and non-native grasslands shall be mitigated off site. Impacts to native grasslands (e.g., grasslands having at least 10% native cover) shall be mitigated at a minimum of 2: 1 and non-native grasslands be mitigated at a 1: 1 ratio (MIYLRP - BIO.1). There is a patch of several hundred specimens of San Diego Ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) located at the northern end of the property. This is a high -profile sensitive species. Project conditions require mitigation in the form of salvage and transplantation. Where impacts to San Diego ambrosia cannot be avoided, the approval of a translocation plan prior to initiating ground disturbing activities shall be required. The translocation plan s specify: 1)-the-methods-used for translocation (e:g-timing of translocation, seed collection, soil retention, etc.); 2) the location and suitability of the receptor site; 3) a long-term management plan for the receptor site; and 4) a long-term funding mechanism. The translocation receptor site should have long-term conservation value, be contiguous with other large, conserved tracts of land, and be managed and protected in perpetuity. The translocation plan should be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Fish & Wildlife (MMRP - BIO.2). Giant Wild Reed (Anmdo donax) is a noxious invasive that fills the eroded gully running through the eastern edge of the property. This has displaced most native riparian elements that would grow in this location under other circumstances. This habitat is of no biological resource value. It should be noted that the gully is likely the result of erosion of a man-made ditch, which was cut in order to install utilities. The project was abandoned and the ditch remained. Nevertheless, this onsite drainage is considered as Freshwater Emergent Wetland, which qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters. National City's General Plan Policy OS-2.2 states the following: "Preserve the ecological integrity of creek corridors, canals, and drainage ditches that support riparian resources by working_ with California Department of Fish and Game to establish a plant palette that is satisfactory and providing for up to 100-foot buffers that protect against development impacts but allow for existing uses and limited future recreational uses." However, as noted above, the area is dominated by a noxious invasive of no biological resource value that has displaced any riparian habitat that might otherwise be located here. Therefore, the gully is not considered to have any ecological integrity in need of preservation. Because the eroded gully qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters, state and federal permitting to allow this drainage to be impacted will be required by the US Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All required permits or related authorizations for the project related to impacting wetlands/waters are a condition of project approval (MMRP - BIO.3) and will need to be secured prior to any development activities taking place. In order to prevent intrusion by exotic species, the landscape design and planting palette shall use native plants to the greatest extent feasible in landscaped areas. The Project applicant shall not plant, seed, or otherwise introduce invasive exotic plant species to landscaped areas adjacent and/or near native habitat areas. Exotic plant species not to be used include those species listed on the California Invasive Plant Council's (Cal-1PC) Invasive Plant Inventory. This list includes (but is not limited to) the following: pepper trees, pampas grass, fountain grass, ice plant, myoporum, black locust, capeweed, tree of heaven, periwinkle, sweet alyssum, English ivy, French broom, Scotch broom, and Spanish broom (MMRP - BIO.4). In order to prevent potential impacts regarding the spread of invasive species during vegetation clearing activities, prior to any such work being undertaken all new equipment introduced to the project area shall be 13 287 of 473 Initial Study - Page 8 of 19 cleaned, and all equipment shall be maintained daily. Additional techniques for minimizing the spread of invasive plant species during construction activities can be found at https://www.cal ipc.orJsolutions/ prevention/ (MVIRP — BIO.5). With mitigation of the native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, the project impacts will be less than significant. There are no adopted habitat conservation plans within the City of National City. V — CULTURAL RESOURCES _Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? (Sources: 3, 8) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? (Sources: 3, 8) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Sources: 3) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? (Sources: 3) No historical or archaeological resources as defined in Section 15064.5 are known to exist on the proposed project site. However, there is one previously recorded cultural resource within a half -mile radius of the project area and two previously recorded historical structures within a half -mile radius of the project area. Due to the number of cultural resources recorded within a half -mile radius of the project area, there is a low likelihood of encountering unrecorded cultural resources within the project area. However, the presence of additional resources cannot be ruled out until a systematic survey is conducted. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ _ X ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ ❑ x State and federal law requires that if any cultural resources are found during construction, work is to stop and the lead agency and a qualified archaeologist be consulted to determine the importance of the find and its appropriate management. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains during construction, the applicant is required take all appropriate steps as required by relevant federal, state, and local laws. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a significant impact to cultural resources. VI — GEOLOGY AND SOILS Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Sources: 9) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Sources: 9) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ L X X 14 288 of 473 Initial Study - Page 9 of 19 iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Sources: 9) iv) Landslides? (Sources: 9) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Sources: 2, 9) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, -liquefaction or collapse? -(Sources: 9) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Sources: 9) e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Sources: 9) J ❑ ❑ x ❑ � X X X ❑ ❑ ❑ x ❑ California Geological Survey information indicates the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, and there are no known active or potentially active faults that intercept the project site; therefore, the potential for ground rupture at this site is considered low. The nearest active fault to the site is the La Nacion Fault, located approximately a mile to the northeast. Accordingly, the site is not considered to possess a significantly greater seismic risk than that of the surrounding area in general. The site is not within an area susceptible to landslides and not within a fault zone, slide prone area or an area susceptible to liquefaction; therefore there is no impact or increased exposure to landslides due to the proposed project. It should be recognized that Southern California is an area that is subject to some degree of seismic risk and that it is generally not considered economically feasible nor technologically practical to build structures that are totally resistant to earthquake -related hazards. Construction in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Uniform Building Code should minimize damage due to seismic events. Due to the number and nature of the active and non -active fault lines within the southern California region, it cannot be known when earthquakes will occur; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. Proposed plans include substantial permeable development (landscaping and pervious concrete). Additionally, all design and construction will require conformance with City's stormwater ordinance and grading regulations. Therefore, there is no impact or increased substantial erosion due to the proposed project. The proposed project site would have traditional sewer laterals, which will connect with the existing sewer system that serves the City. There would be no use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems; therefore, no impact. VII - GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? (Sources: 1, 10, 11) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 15 289 of 473 Initial Study - Page 10 of 19 b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? (Sources: 1,10, 11) ❑ ❑ x GHG emissions contribute, on a cumulative basis, to the significant adverse environmental impacts of global climate change. No single project could generate enough GHG emissions to noticeably change the global average temperature. The combination of GHG emissions from past, present, and future projects contributes substantially to the phenomenon of global climate change and its associated environmental impacts and as such is addressed only as a cumulative impact. The project's GHG emissions would occur over the short construction duration, and would consist primarily of emissions from equipment exhaust. There would also be long-term regional emissions associated with proj ect-related new vehicular trips and indirect source emissions, such as energy usage. The existing density in the area would allow up to 15 residential units. Approval of the project would allow 29 units. The 14 additional units could be reasonably estimated to generate 82 additional average daily trips (ADT). This amount does not trigger any threshold for a focused traffic study or traffic impact analysis. As such, although the project would contribute to airborne pollutants, this project will have a less than significant impact on air quality. California has adopted several policies and regulations for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. On December 11, 2008, CARB adopted the AB 32 Scoping Plan to achieve the goals of AB 32 that establishes an overall framework for the measures that will be adopted to reduce California's GHG emissions. The proposed project is subject to compliance with AB 32, which is designed to reduce statewide GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. In addition, in 2012 the City of National City adopted its Climate Action Plan and associated targets to reduce GHG missions by 15 percent below 2005/2006 levels by 2020, with additional reductions by 2030. Some of the primary provisions of the Climate Action Plan are to promote greater density and infill development, water conservation, energy efficiency, and waste reduction strategies. The proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHG emissions, as contained in the Climate Action Plan. Based on the above, therefore no impact. VIII — HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Sources: 1) b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Sources: 1) c) Enait hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sources: 1) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Sources: 1) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation LI X X X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a 16 290 of 473 Initial Study - Page 11 of 19 plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Sources: 1) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where -residences are -intermixed with wildlands? (Sources: 1) ❑ — X ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ X The proposed project is a 29-unit multi -family development located adjacent to an established residential community. No transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials is expected. A residential neighborhood will likewise not cause any reasonably foreseeable upset or accident condition involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The project is not expected to emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste in general, and is not within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. The site is vacant and has never been developed, therefore is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. As a result the project would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Therefore, there would be no impact. There is no adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan in the City, although there are local considerations that are included as appendices to the Unified San Diego County Emergency Services Organization approved Annex Q of the Operational Area Emergency Plan. The project does not conflict with any of the considerations or plans in the Area Emergency Plan, thus no conflict. The site is not on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5; There are no airports or airstrips in the vicinity; the project would not interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan; and the project is not adjacent to any wildlands or land subject to wildland fires; therefore there would not be any significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildfires. Therefore, there is no impact. IX — HYDROLOGY / WATER QUALITY Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Sources: 1) b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (Sources: 1) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? (Sources: 1, 3, 6, 7) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation. Impact Incorporation X X X 1 17 291 of 473 Initial Study - Page 12 of 19 d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (Sources: 1, 3) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Sources: 1) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Sources: 1) g)— Place -housing -within a .100-yearflood hazard area as mapped on_a_ federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Sources: 1) h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Sources: 1) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Sources: 1) j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? (Sources: 1) The project will be subject to water quality and discharge requirements through the City's Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan (JRMP). In addition, the project will only result in 14 additional units over what is currently permitted by right in the existing zone. Design of the project will require compliance with all storm water handling, storage, drainage, and hydromodification regulations. The property is not located within a 100-year flood hazard area or an area influenced by any levee or dam failure, seiche, tsunami, or mudflow; therefore, no impact. The onsite drainage is considered as Freshwater Emergent Wetland, which qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters. State and federal permitting to allow this drainage to be impacted will be required by the US Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All required permits or related authorizations for the project related to impacting wetlands/waters are a condition of project approval (MMRP) and will need to be secured prior to any development activities taking place. Grading and development of the project will direct all runoff into drainage facilities located on site and will not flow on to adjacent properties. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact. X — LAND USE AND PLANNENG Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact 1litigation Impact Incorporation X X 18 292 of 473 Initial Study - Page 13 of 19 c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (Sources: 1, 2) X The site is surrounded by existing unrelated development including a shopping center to the north, an office building and bus storage yard to the east, a single-family neighborhood to the west beyond a hill, and a mixed -density residential neighborhood across East 16th Street to the south. There is no connection between the developments. Development of the site would not physically impact the existing community; therefore, there would be no impact to established communities. While the request includes a zone change and general plan amendment, the project is a residential use in a residential zone. The zone change and amendment would allow an additional 14 homes in this case. The existing area is currently zoned for 8.7 units per acre, while it has an existing density of approximately 11 units per acre. The proposed density would be 17 units per acre, which is in the middle of the range permitted under the zone the property will be changed to (RM-1 or Medium Density Multi -Unit Residential), which 9-23 units per acre (the project will be conditioned to 29 units). This density will be consistent with both the General Plan, Local Coastal Plan, and the Land Use Code; therefore, there would be no conflict with said. plans. There are no applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plans in the City, therefore no impact. XI — MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Sources: 1) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Sources: 1) Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Less Than No Significant w/ Significant Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ _ X ❑ ❑ X The project site is located completely within an urbanized area and surrounded by development. The site contains no known mineral resources on the proposed project site or delineated on a local plan for the site; therefore, there is no impact to mineral resources. XH-NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Sources: 1) d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? 19 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ X X X 293 of 473 Initial Study - Page 14 of 19 (Sources: 1, 2, 3) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) ❑ C _ x The propose�c project area is in an urbanized area and is a residential -use in an area of mostly residential development. The use is not expected to exceed the ambient noise in this area from the bus yard and shopping center nearby. Furthermore, the project is subject to the limitations contained in the City's Noise Ordinance; therefore, no impacts are expected. The associated construction on the project site would create temporary noise impacts. Modern construction equipment, properly used and maintained, should not exceed the noise limits contained in the City's Noise Ordinance All noise generated by the project would be required to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance and be limited to specific hours of operation. No significant impact from the project would occur. The proposed project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport or private airstrip; therefore, there is no impact to those people working on the project site. XIII — POPULATION AND HOUSING Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ 11 1 X The property is currently zoned for 15 residential units by right. The project is for 29 units, an increase of 14, which will not create any impacts on adjacent streets or parking facilities. The property is vacant, therefore no housing or people will be displaced. Therefore, there will be no impact. XIV — PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered 20 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 294 of 473 Initial Study - Page 15 of 19 governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (Sources: 1, 3) Police protection? (Sources: 1, 3) Schools? (Sources: 1, 3) Parks? (Sources: 1, 3) Other public facilities? (Sources: 1, 3) 0 CI The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to public services. The project site is currently and will continue to be served by the National City Fire and Police Department. The closest Fire Station is approximately a half mile away on East 16th Street, and the the Police Station at 12th Street and National City Boulevard is one mile away. Typical response time for this area would not be adversely impacted, as plans do not involve changes to public streets adjacent to the site and since plans include retaining emergency access throughout the project area. Also, the development will generate impact fees specifically slated for public services that will supplement any additional requirements brought about by the development; therefore, there is no significant impact. Park and school fees will also be paid as part of the development to offset any increase in need generated by the project, thus no impact. XV — RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Sources: 1,2,3) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation X There are three parks within a mile and a half of the project, which are currently underutilized and able to accommodate potential use by the additional 14 families that could be expected from the project. Therefore, there would be no impact. XVI — TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 21 295 of 473 Initial Study - Page 16 of 19 a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of ❑ ❑ ❑ X the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4) b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and - travel -demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? (Sources: 1, 2, 3) X ❑ ❑ _ X ❑ ❑ _ X ❑ - ❑ x There are no plans, ordinances, or policies that measure circulation system current effectiveness or performance, thus no impact. There is also no congestion management program that the project would conflict with. This segment of East 16h Street ("L" Avenue to Palm Avenue) currently has an ADT (Average Daily Trip) rate 7,800 and a capacity of 10,000 ADT. The segment operates at a current Level of Service (LOS) of D and is expocted to operate at an LOS of F in 2035. According to trip generation rates published by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), a 29-unit multi -family residential project could be expected to generate 232 ADT. While only 82 ADT would be an increase covered by this environmental review, the roadway can accommodate the 232 ADT without exceeding the current or proposed (2035) maximum capacity. No change in road design is proposed which would cause a safety risk or hinder emergency access. The project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities, as there are no such activities existing or planned in this area, thus no impact. XVII — UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation X 22 296 of 473 Initial Study - Page 17 of 19 Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources: 1, 13) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1, 13) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1, 13) d) Have--sufficient-water supplies available to -serve -the -project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Sources: 1, 13) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Sources: 1, 13) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Sources: 1, 14) g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? (Sources: 1, 14) ❑ x ❑ - x ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ ❑ x The proposed project would be designed and constructed using Best Management Practices (BMPs) to appropriately handle wastewater and not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board; therefore, there is no impact. The proposed project is located within an urbanized area and served by existing water facilities. There is an existing 16-inch PVC water main in the East 16th Street right-of-way that can service the property. Sweetwater Authority, the local water provider, has indicated that additional infrastructure, as needed, can be provided. Also, all necessary improvements will be included with the project approval and construction will be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations; therefore, there would not be a significant adverse impact. The proposed project site would be served by EDCO, the local waste collection and recycle company. EDCO has a contract with the City to handle City residents' waste disposal and recycling needs. According to EDCO staff, the company utilizes several landfill sites for the disposal of waste collected in National City, with the most common being Otay Mesa, Sycamore, and Miramar Landfills, with an additional 12, 26 and 9 years of capacity remaining respectively; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. There are two other landfill sites in San Diego County - the Ramona landfill, which is full, and Borrego Springs landfill, which has an additional 30 years capacity remaining. In addition, the proposed project would comply with all federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. 23 297 of 473 Initial Study - Page 18 of 19 XVIII —MANDATORY FINDINGS of SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples— of the - major periods of California_ history or prehistory? (Sources: 1) b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? (Sources: 1) c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? (Sources: 1) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ x Discussion: No significant impacts to the environment as a result of this project have been identified, other than for Native Grassland and San Diego Ambrosia, impacts to both of which will be mitigated to a level of no significant impact. Approval of the project is not expected to have any significant impacts, either long- term or short-term, nor will it cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 24 298 of 473 Initial Study- Page 19 of 19 REFERENCE SOURCES: Reference # Document Title 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 11 National City General Plan City of National City Municipal Code Case File 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S SANDAG trip generation by land use US Fish and Wildlife Service US Fish and Wildlife Wetland Mapper System Preliminary Biological Resources Assessment — Case File 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) cultural resources records search California Department of Conservation City of National City Final Climate Action Plan Environmental Protection Agency Comments received from Building, Engineering, and Fire Departments, and Sweetwater Authority California Integrated Waste Management Board Environmental Protection Agency Available for Review at: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 http://www.nationalcityca.gov/ National City Planning Department National City Planning Department NV vw.sandaa,Org https://www.fws.gov/ https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/d ata/mapper.html National City Planning Department National City Planning Department http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ cas/fam/ National City Planning Department https://www.epa.aov/enerw/aree rehouse -gas -equivalencies - calculator National City Planning Department http://www.ciwmb.ca.gov/ haps://www.epa.gov/energy/gree nhouse-gas-equivalencies- calculator 25 299 of 473 MITIGATION MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM 2017-04 GPA, ZC, S - General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Tentative Subdivision Map for the rezoning of property at East 16`h Street and "M" Avenue in order to construct a 29-unit residential development. SCH# 2018091023 BIO.1 Impacts to native and non-native grasslands shall be mitigated off site. Impacts to native grasslands (e.g., grasslands having at least 10% native cover) shall be mitigated at a minimum of 2: 1 and non-native grasslands be mitigated at a 1: 1 ratio. BIO.2 There is a patch of several hundred specimens of San Diego Ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila) located at the northern end of the property. This is a high -profile sensitive species. Project conditions require mitigation in the form of salvage and transplantation. Approval of a translocation plan is required prior to initiating ground disturbing activities. The translocation plan should specify: 1) the methods used for translocation (e.g., timing of translocation, seed collection, soil retention, etc.); 2) the location and suitability of the receptor site; 3) a long- term management plan for the receptor site; and 4) a long-term funding mechanism. The translocation receptor site should have long-term conservation value, be contiguous with other large, conserved tracts of land, and be managed and protected in perpetuity. The translocation plan should be submitted for review and approval by the Department of Fish & Wildlife prior to the onset of project impacts. BIO.3 The onsite drainage is considered as Freshwater Emergent Wetland, which qualifies as jurisdictional wetlands/waters. State and federal permitting to allow this drainage to be impacted will be required by the US Army Corps of Engineers, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. All required permits or related authorizations for the project related to impacting wetlands/waters are a condition of project approval and will need to be secured prior to any development activities taking place. BIO.4 The landscape design and planting palette shall use native plants to the greatest extent feasible in landscaped areas. The Project applicant shall not plant, seed, or othenvise introduce invasive exotic plant species to landscaped areas adjacent and/or near native habitat areas. Exotic plant species not to be used include those species listed on the California Invasive Plant Council's (Cal-1PC) Invasive Plant Inventory. This list includes (but is not limited to) the following: pepper trees, pampas grass, fountain grass, ice plant, myoporum, black locust, capeweed, tree of heaven, periwinkle, sweet alyssum, English ivy, French broom, Scotch broom, and Spanish broom. BIO.5 In order to prevent potential impacts regarding the spread of invasive species during vegetation clearing activities, prior to any such work being undertaken all new equipment introduced to the project area shall be cleaned, and all equipment shall be maintained daily. Additional techniques for minimizing the spread of invasive plant species during construction activities can be found at https://www.cal ipc.org/solutions/ prevention/. 26 300 of 473 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR CERTIFICATION OF THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION 2017-04 IS — 16th & "M" Avenue 557-351-17 through 25 That the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, because while there is plant habitat on site in the form of native and non-native grassland, San Diego Ambrosia, and onsite drainage, the Mitigated Negative Declaration for this project provides for mitigation that will reduce potential impacts to a level of less than significance. 2. That the project does not have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable, because the project is an infill development on a historically vacant property. The area is surrounded by urban development and the existing improvements and development pattern can accommodate the project without causing any impacts to the environment or to existing services. 3. That the project does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, because the project is a residential development designed to provide a safe living environment for people. In addition, in excess of the required landscaped open space is provided, providing screening from adjacent uses, recreation space, and an offset for Carbon Dioxide (CO2) emissions. 4. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with CEQA for which a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared. The MND has determined that, although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment without mitigation, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) included as part of the certified MND reduce the impact to a Tess than significant level with mitigation incorporated. ATTACHMENT 3 27 301 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 302 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Notice of Decision — Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit for beer and wine sales at an existing restaurant (Los Tito's) located at 917 South Euclid Avenue. (Danny Damian) (Case File 2018-13 CUP) (Planning) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 302 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE: Notice of Decision — Planning Commission approval of a Conditional Use Permit for beer and wine sales at an existing restaurant (Los Tito's) located at 917 South Euclid Avenue. (Danny Damian) (Case File 2018-13 CUP) PREPARED BY: Chris Stanley C.5 DEPARTMENT: Planning.; PHONE: 619-336-4381 APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: The business has applied for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to sell beer and wine at an existing restaurant (Los Tito's). The proposed hours for the sale of beer and wine 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, 8 a.m. to 11 p.m. Friday and Saturday, and 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. on Sundays. A Type 41 (On -Site Sale of Beer and Wine) license is concurrently being processed with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on December 17, 2018. Commissioners asked questions regarding business operations, hours of operation, and Police Department comments. The Commission voted to approve the CUP based on required findings and subject to Conditions of Approval, subject to hours of operation noted above. Two community members spoke in support of the application. The attached Planning Commission staff report describes the proposal in detail. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Not a project per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: APPROVED: APPROVED: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit. Ayes: Quintero, Garcia, Flores, Yamane, Sendt, Baca Absent: DelaPaz ATTACHMENTS: 11. Overhead 3. Resolution No. 2018-21 2. Planning Commission Staff Report 4. Reduced Plans 303 of 473 2018-13 CUP — 917 South Euclid Avenue — Overhead ATTACHMENT 1 1 304 of 473 Title: CALIFORNIA NATIONAL CH' �NCORPORATE� CITY OF NATIONAL CITY - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD., NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Item no. 3 December 17, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BEER AND WINE SALES AT AN EXISTING RESTAURANT (LOS TITO'S) LOCATED AT 917 SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE Case File No.: 2018-13 CUP Location: Northeast corner of Euclid Avenue and East 8th Street Assessor's Parcel Nos.: 558-010-55 Staff report by: Chris Stanley, Acting Assistant Planner Applicant: Danny Damian (City Heights Food Services Corp.) Zoning designation: MXD-1 (Minor Mixed -Use District) Adjacent zoning: North: Commercial use / MXD-1 East: Summercrest Apartments / RM-2 (High Density Multi -Unit Residential) South: Commercial use / MXC-1 (Minor Mixed -Use Corridor) West: Commercial use across Euclid Avenue / MXC-1 & MXD-2 (Major Mixed -Use District) Environmental review: Not a project per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Staff recommendation: Approve ATTACHMENT 2 2 305 of 473 Planning Commission Meeting of December 17, 2018 Page 2 Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the on -site sale of beer and wine at an existing restaurant, "Los Tito's", subject to the attached recommended conditions. The sale of alcohol is conditionally allowed in the Minor Mixed -Use District zone and would be accessory to the restaurant. Staff is suggesting alcohol sales hours consistent with recent alcohol CUP (Conditional Use Permit) approvals. Executive Summary The business has applied for a CUP to sell beer and wine at an existing restaurant (Los Tito's). The hours for the sale of beer and wine, as proposed by the applicant, are 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Friday through Sunday. A Type 41 (On -Site Sale of Beer and Wine) license is concurrently being processed with the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Site Characteristics The project location is an existing 1,342 square -foot suite located at 917 South Euclid Avenue; the property is known as Euclid Plaza. The suite shares an existing commercial building with businesses to the north (Metro PCS) and south (Firestone Tires). An apartment complex (Summercrest Apartments) is located directly east of the property. Another commercial plaza exists south of Plaza Blvd. and west across Euclid Ave. The commercial plaza (Euclid Plaza) continues north of Los Tito's with major commercial tenants such as Walgreens and Vallarta Supermarket. Proposed Use The applicant is proposing to sell beer and wine at the existing restaurant, which is located in a suite of an existing commercial building. The floor plan provided with this application shows eight tables with four seats per table for a total of 32 seats, as well as three booths, with four seats each, for a total of 12 seats. Alcohol would be delivered to the table upon request and would only be available with the sale of food. Proposed alcohol sales hours are from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Friday through Sunday. No live entertainment is proposed. Analysis Section 18.30.050 of the Land Use Code allows for on -site alcohol sales with an approved CUP. Additional requirements for alcohol CUPs include expanded notification, a community meeting, and distance requirements. 3 306 of 473 Planning Commission Meeting of December 17, 2018 Page 3 Mailing - All property owners and occupants within a distance of 660 feet are required to be notified of a public hearing for alcohol -related CUP applications. Notice of this public hearing was sent to 892 occupants and owners. Community Meeting - Pursuant to Section 18.30.050 (C) of the National City Zoning Code, a community meeting was held Wednesday, November 21, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the subject restaurant. The meeting advertisement is attached. There were no community members in attendance. According to the applicant, the same 892 occupants and owners were notified. Distance Requirements - Chapter 18.030.050 (D) of the National City Zoning Code requires a 660-foot distance from sensitive uses such as schools (Kindergarten through 12th grade); no such uses exist within the required distance. Alcohol Sales Concentration/Location - Per State ABC, there are currently three on -sale licenses in this census tract (120.02) where a maximum of four are recommended. For reference, the alcohol outlets in the census tract are: Name Address License Type* CUP Closing Hours Gapo Resto & Karaoke 933 S. Harbison Ave. 41 - 12:00 a.m. Tita's II Restaurant 3421 E. Plaza Blvd. 41 Y 12:00 a.m. The Ace Crab 3403 E. Plaza Blvd. 41 Y 10:00 p.m. * Type 41 — On -Sale Beer and Wine for Bona Fide Public Eating Place The three licenses are all restaurants. Census tract 120.02 includes the area south of East 8th Street, north of East Plaza Boulevard, east of the 805 freeway, and west of Manchester Street. The attached census tract map shows the location of the subject tract (Attachment 6). Hours of Operation The hours of operation for the existing license holders range from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. for the varying properties. Recent alcohol sales hours have been between 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. IPS recommends that the serving of alcohol not be permitted after 10:00 p.m. The Police Department rates the sale of alcohol after 11:00 p.m. as a "three" on their rating system, which usually indicates a high risk. With both the Police Department and IPS (Institute for Public Strategies) comments in mind, staff is recommending alcohol sales hours of 10:00 a.m. to 4 307 of 473 Planning Commission Meeting of December 17, 2018 Page 4 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Friday to Sunday. Recommended conditions reflect the hours recommended by staff. IPS IPS provided comments recommending that owners, management, and staff be required to attend RBSS (Responsible Beverage Sales and Service) training as well as the sale of beer and wine ceasing by 10:00 p.m. The RBSS training is a standard condition of City Council Policy 707 and is included as a condition of approval. Police Department (PD) The ABC Risk Assessment provided by PD allocated a total of 13 points, which places it in the Medium Risk category. Medium risk is considered 13 to 18 points (Attachment 9). Findings for Approval The Municipal Code contains six required findings for CUPs as follows: 1. The proposed use is allowable within the applicable zoning district pursuant to a Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Land Use Code. The use is allowable within the Minor Mixed -Use District zone pursuant to a CUP, and the proposed use meets the required guidelines in the Land Use Code for alcohol sales, as discussed in the staff report. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan. Alcohol sales are permitted, subject to a CUP, by the Land Use Code, which is consistent with the General Plan. A restaurant use is consistent with the Minor Mixed -Use District land use designation contained in the Land Use and Community Character element of the General Plan. In addition, the property is not within a Specific Plan area. 3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity. 5 308 of 473 Planning Commission Meeting of December 17, 2018 Page 5 No expansion of the building is proposed. The proposal involves an existing restaurant in an existing commercial space, which was already analyzed for traffic impacts when it was constructed. In addition, because the sale of alcohol would be accessory to the sale of food, no measurable increase in traffic is expected. 4. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints. The proposed alcohol sales would be accessory to a restaurant use, which is located in an existing commercial area. The addition of alcohol sales is not expected to increase the demand for parking on the property. 5. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance or be injurious or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located. The proposed use will be subject to conditions that limit the sale of beer and wine as well as the hours that it will be available; no beer or wine will be sold after 10:00 p.m. and will only be available with the sale of food. In addition, all business staff is required to receive RBSS training. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The project is not considered a project under CEQA, as no development is proposed. In addition, the proposed use is similar to other commercial uses in the area, which are permitted by right in the mixed -use zones. Given that there is no calculable increase in traffic and no other impacts are anticipated, staff is of the opinion that the project would not result in any physical changes to the environment. The following two conditions are also included with alcohol CUPs: 7. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or necessity. 6 309 of 473 Planning Commission Meeting of December 17, 2018 Page 6 In this case, alcohol sales would contribute to the viability of the restaurant, an allowed use in the Minor Mixed -Use District zone. 8. Based on findings 1 through 7 above, public convenience and necessity will be served by a proposed use of the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. Findings for Denial Due to there being other on -sale sites in the area, there are also findings for denial as follows: 1. The proposed use is not deemed essential to the public necessity, as there are three other restaurants in census tract 120.02 that already serve beer and wine. 2. Based on finding 1 above, public convenience and necessity will not be served by a proposed use of the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. Conditions of Approval Standard Conditions of Approval have been included with this permit, as well as conditions specific to on -sale alcohol sales per City Council Policy 707 (alcohol incidental to food, hours of operation, RBSS training, etc.). Summary The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan due to alcohol sales for on - site consumption being a conditionally -allowed use in the Minor Mixed -Use District. The proposed use would be accessory to the existing restaurant use in a commercial area. The addition of alcohol sales is not expected to increase the demand for parking, other services on the property, or have any significant effects on the area. 7 310 of 473 Planning Commission Meeting of December 17, 2018 Page 7 Options 1. Approve 2018-13 CUP subject to the conditions listed below, based on the attached findings, or findings to be determined by the Planning Commission; or 2. Deny 2018-13 CUP based on the attached finding or findings to be determined by the Planning Commission; or, 3. Continue the item to a specific date in order to obtain additional information. Attachments 1. Recommended Findings 2. Recommended Conditions of Approval 3. Overhead 4. Applicant's Plans (Exhibit A, Case File No. 2018-13 CUP, dated 6/21/2018) 5. Public Hearing Notice (Sent to 892 property owners & occupants) 6. Census Tract & Police Beat Map 7. Community Meeting Advertisement / Sign -In Sheet 8. City Council Policy 707 9. Police Department Comments 10. Resolutions CHRIS STANLEY RAYMOND PE Acting Assistant Planner Acting Planning Director 8 311 of 473 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 2018-13 CUP — 917 South Euclid Avenue 1 The proposed use is allowable within the applicable zoning district pursuant to a Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Land Use Code, because alcohol sales for on -site consumption is a conditionally allowed use in the Minor Mixed Use District zone. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. Alcohol sales are permitted, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, by the Land Use Code, which is consistent with the General Plan. In addition, a restaurant use is consistent with the Minor Mixed -Use land use designation contained in the Land Use and Community Character (LU) element of the General Plan. Furthermore, the property is not within a Specific Plan area. 3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, because no expansion is proposed, and the use would be accessory to the existing restaurant in the commercial area. 4. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints, because the restaurant is existing and the proposed alcohol sales would be accessory to the restaurant use. The sale of alcohol is not expected to increase the demand for parking on the property. 5. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance, be injurious, or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located, because the proposed use will be subject to conditions that limit the sale of alcohol and the hours that it will be available; no alcohol will be sold after 10 p.m. and will only be available with the sale of food; all business staff is required to receive Responsible Beverage Service & Sales (RBSS) Training. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and because there is no development, it has been determined that the proposed use is not a project per the Act; there is no calculable increase in traffic and no other impacts are anticipated. The project would not result in any physical changes to the environment. 9 312 of 473 7. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or necessity because beer and wine sales would contribute to the viability of the restaurant, an allowed use in the Minor Mixed -Use District zone. 8. Based on findings 1 through 7 above, public convenience and necessity will be served by a proposed use of the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL 2018-13 CUP — 917 South Euclid Avenue 1. The proposed use is not deemed essential to the public necessity, because there are three other restaurants in census tract 120.02 that serve beer and wine. 2. Based on the above finding, public convenience and necessity will not be served by a proposed use of the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. 10 313 of 473 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 2018-13 CUP — 917 South Euclid Avenue General 1. This Conditional Use Permit authorizes the sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption at an existing restaurant located at 917 South Euclid Avenue. Plans submitted for permits associated with this project shall conform to Exhibit A, Case File No. 2018-13 CUP, dated 6/21/2018. 2. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner shall both sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Department that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Deputy City Manager prior to recordation. 3. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in the Municipal Code. 4. This permit shall expire if the use authorized by this resolution is discontinued for a period of 12 months or longer. This permit may also be revoked, pursuant to provisions of the Land Use Code, if discontinued for any lesser period of time. 5. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked if the operator is found to be in violation of any Conditions of Approval. Planning 6. All sellers and servers of alcohol shall receive Responsible Beverage Service and Sales (RBSS) training, including all owners, and managers. The RBSS training must be certified by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Proof of completion of an approved RBSS program must be provided prior to issuance of a city business license. As part of the RBSS training, the permittee shall make available a domestic violence training session as provided by the Institute of Public Strategies. 11 314 of 473 7. The sale of alcohol shall not exceed the sale of food. With the annual renewal of the City business license, the business proprietor shall submit a statement clearly indicating total alcoholic beverage sales and total food sales. Said statement shall be subject to audit and verification by employees of the City, who are authorized to examine, audit and inspect such books and records of the license, as may be necessary in their judgement to verify that the sale of alcohol does not exceed the sale of food. All information obtained by an investigation of records shall remain confidential. 8. Alcohol shall be available only in conjunction with the purchase of food. 9. The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Friday through Sunday. 10. This permit does not include live entertainment. If in the future the applicant chooses to add live entertainment, the Conditional Use Permit shall be amended through the Discretionary Permit process. 12 315 of 473 +r CALIFORNIA +- A iI.ONALM it 'NQORPORATE� CITY OF NATIONAL CITY - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD., NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AT AN EXISTING RESTAURANT (LOS TITO'S) LOCATED AT 917 SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE CASE FILE NO.: 2018-13 CUP APN: 558-010-55 The National City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing after the hour of 6:00 p.m. Monday, December 17, 2018, in the City Council Chambers, Civic Center, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California, on the proposed request. (Applicant: Danny Damian) This application has been submitted for Planning Commission consideration. The project site is an existing restaurant in the Minor Mixed -Use District (MXD-1) zone. The applicant is proposing to sell beer and wine for on -site consumption (Type 41 License) in the 1,300 square -foot commercial space. The proposed alcohol sales hours are 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday to Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Friday to Sunday. Information is available for review at the City's Planning Department, Civic Center. Members of the public are invited to comment. Written comments should be received on or before 12:00 p.m., December 17, 2018 by the Planning Department, who can be contacted at 619-336-4310 or planning@nationalcityca.gov If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission at, or prior to, the public hearing. NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RAYMOND PE Acting Planning Director 13 316 of 473 August 25, 2014 CensusTracts 2010 1:45,467 0 0.375 0.75 I i t 0 0.5 1 2 km 1.5 mi Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLonne, TomTcm, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), swisstopo, Mapmylndia, OpenStreelMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 317 of 473 Z.St-- - r Henderson v Recreation Center so --Boston Ave n cO Patin St Coban s �fi �Q rn Reynolds St ' `r —1_1!1,1 Sofola Ave San Diego Q Magnus t -. pm Vista Ave m t N 0Pl P Beta St Beta St Is '''St Q La Gamma St ¢' z z Q; }` i— St Delta St z en { £ Ask Scott r \ C. £ 2td St Fig CI 9 Sidt.c} g .. w £ m Eta St. gtist sk I El Toyon Park g1ri tr., ' st E Z q N.. Ko oS E 4' piN 15t gt t ` t sk St O{ g St Y s s 64' s 1m y .,he £ 3� gt , y N National CHq N m -.__:, St St 7; y E 5� -73 7 an0 ON St m ytr St. 8� St e£ • 1� �vd Y� Reo E £ £}ate 9 a \ to st `q, 1 1 St `� r .\ E t1 it Ce sk s Al t E i,A•n, 9� mA E. Ate Bird s 12t1`s��a `.•,s SA1� 'N ■• Kkot 11. o l 5t0 15� m £tea st £ 1 St no vdi n m 4d gt $ St \, £22 cls w 2l} Las Palmas �T St Copynght© and (P) 1998-2006 Micros▪ oft Corpor�(ion andfdr rts suppliers. At nghtsReserved. F odisns ©1990-200.5InstallS, igld Software Corporation. All rights reserved Cee ain mapping and dyection data© 2005<•�JiiVf€"O. All rights reserved. NAVTEO and NAVTEO ON�+BOARD are tradem29k bfMAVTEO. © 2005 Tele Atlas Nnnh America, Inc. All rights reserved. Teter tIas and Tele Atlas North America are trademarks of Tele Atlas, Inc. } 1 _. v CO) s' 3 o 9 £t4nB t� Q N St a6t rP d s A90cto �¢T gt sty 4 0se Valley a .1 N ��G ` N $t Y y ShawSlv 20'a` � � y vtowoka Source: Microsoft MapPoint NCPD CAU, 4/18/07 City of National City Beat 21 15 318 of 473 November 14, 2018 Dear Resident / Business Owner - You are cordially invited to attend a community meeting regarding a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) with the city of National City by City Heights Food Services Corp. (Doing Business As - Los Titos Mexican Food Restaurant) for a California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type-41 license (beer and wine) to compliment their existing restaurant. Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:OOpm to 7:00pm City Heights Food Services Inc. dba - Los Titos Mexican Food Restaurant 917 Euclid Avenue National City, CA 91950 The applicant will provide an overview of their request and have a question and answer session shortly thereafter. If you have any questions please feel free to contact Marco Cortes at (619) 852-4690 (or at marco@cortescommunications.com). 16 319 of 473 SIGN -IN -SHEET PROJECT: Conditional Use Permit / ABC Type-41 License Request Community Meeting Wednesday, November 21, 2018 6:00pm — 7:00pm City Heights Food Services Inc. dba - Los Titos Mexican Food Restaurant 917 Euclid Avenue National City, CA 91950 NAME ADDRESS SIGNATURE 17 320 of 473 CITY COUNCIL POLICY TITLE: Alcohol Beverage License Application Review Process POLICY and Alcohol Conditional Use Permit Standards NUMBER 707 ADOPTED: November 12, 1991 AMENDED OR REVISED: July 17, 2018 Page 1 of 5 PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: To streamline the process of alcohol license application review to ensure timely staff responses and/or protests to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control regarding these applications. The City Municipal Code requires Conditional Use Permits for the sale of alcohol. Such land use regulation is designed to ensure that the health, safety and welfare of the community does not become negatively impacted. In order to minimize any potential adverse effects of alcohol sales for both on and off -site consumption, including public drunkenness, disorderly conduct, illegal sales or domestic violence, the City adopts conditions of approvals and enact policies designed to protect the public from such effects. The following sets forth the City Council's policy on the applicable alcohol standards for Conditional Use Permit applications for both on and off -sale alcohol sales, as well as the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control application notification requirements. POLICY: The Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) sends copies of all alcoholic beverage license applications to the Police Department. The City has thirty days from the date of the ABC mailing to provide comments to the ABC. If no protests are received within that time period, the ABC issues the license. The Police Department is responsible for ensuring that an appropriate Conditional Use Permit (CUP) exists for the applicant business. If such a CUP exists, the copy of the application is simply filed by the Police Department in the existing file with the notation that there were no objections to the issuance of the license. If it is a new (in the case of an "original" license application) or expanding business or one seeking a license to effect a premises transfer, and no CUP exists, the Police Department is responsible for sending a letter to the ABC protesting the issuance of the license until a CUP is issued by the City. Whenever such a protest letter is sent to the ABC, that agency notifies the applicant that they must begin the process of obtaining a CUP with the City's Planning Division and that the issuance of the alcoholic beverage license will be delayed until such time as the protest is withdrawn. 18 321 of 473 CITY COUNCIL POLICY TITLE: Alcohol Beverage License Application Review Process POLICY and Alcohol Conditional Use Permit Standards NUMBER 707 ADOPTED: November 12, 1991 AMENDED OR REVISED: July 17, 2018 Page 2 of 5 Once a CUP has been issued, the Planning Division notifies the Police Department of that issuance and it is then the responsibility of the Police Department to notify the ABC that the protest is withdrawn. The CUP application, approval and issuance process is such that it provides all the checks, balances and controls necessary to ensure that businesses seeking alcoholic beverage licenses are in compliance with local standards. These conditions of approval shall apply to all new Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) for the sale of alcohol for on and/or off -site consumption and modifications of existing CUPs for such sales as specified by the preceding parenthetical references with each condition. These references specify to which type of alcohol CUP being applied for the conditions would apply to — on -sale (restaurant, bar, etc) or off -sale (market, grocery store, etc). Regulation of these conditions and allowances shall be enforced through the Conditional Use Permit process, specifically conditions of approval to read as follows 1. (off -sale alcohol) The sale of beer or malt beverages in quantities of quarts, 22 ounce, 32 ounce, 40 ounce, or similar size containers is prohibited. 2. (off -sale alcohol) No beer products shall be sold of less than manufacturer's pre- packaged three -pack quantities of 24 ounce cans per sale. There shall be no sale of single cans or bottles. 3. (off -sale alcohol) No sale of wine shall be sold in containers of less than 750 milliliters. The sale of wine with an alcoholic content greater than 15% by volume is prohibited. 4. (off -sale alcohol) Flavored malt beverages, also known as premium malt beverages and flavored malt coolers, and sometimes commonly referred to as wine coolers, may be sold only by four -pack or other manufacturer's pre- packaged multi -unit quantities. 5. (off -sale alcohol) The consumption of alcoholic beverages is prohibited on the subject premises, and on all parking lots and outbuildings and any property or adjacent property under the control of the applicant. 6. (off -sale alcohol) All cups and containers shall be sold at or above prevailing prices and in their original multi -container packages of no fewer than 12, and no cups and containers shall be given free of charge. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY 19 322 of 473 CITY COUNCIL POLICY TITLE: Alcohol Beverage License Application Review Process POLICY and Alcohol Conditional Use Permit Standards NUMBER 707 ADOPTED: November 12, 1991 AMENDED OR REVISED: July 17, 2018 Page 3 of 5 7. (off -sale alcohol) Ice may be sold only at or about prevailing prices in the area and in quantities of not Tess than three pounds per sale. Ice shall not be provided free of charge. 8. (off -sale alcohol) The display of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to an area in substantial conformance with Exhibit , Case File No. , dated 9. (off -sale alcohol) Permittee shall post signs on the exterior building walls in compliance with Chapter 10.30.070 of the National City Municipal Code. Additionally, the permittee shall post signs, to be approved by the Planning Division, at each entrance to the applicant's premises and parking lot, prohibiting loitering and consumption of alcohol on the premises and adjacent property under his control. Said signs shall not be less than 17 by 22 inches in size, with lettering not Tess than one inch in height. The signs shall read as follows: a. "No open alcoholic beverage containers are allowed on these premises." b. "No loitering is allowed." 10. (off -sale alcohol) Containers of alcohol may not be stored on the premises, after being sold to patrons, for the purpose of later consumption. 11. (off -sale alcohol) Exterior advertising and signs of all types, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages, including advertising/signs directed to the exterior from within, are prohibited. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages and signs, which are clearly visible to the exterior, shall constitute a violation of this condition. 12. (off -sale alcohol) The quarterly gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed the gross sales of all other commodities during the same period. The applicant shall at all times keep records which reflect separately the gross sales of alcoholic beverages and the gross sales of all other items. Said records shall be kept no less frequently than on a quarterly basis and shall be made available to the City Finance Department and any Peace Officer of the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control upon demand. 13.(on and off -sale alcohol) All sellers and servers of alcohol shall receive Responsible Beverage Service and Sales (RBSS) training, including all owners, and managers. The RBSS training must be certified by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Proof of completion of an approved RBSS program must be provided prior to issuance of a city business license. As part - CITY OF NATIONAL CITY 20 323 of 473 CITY COUNCIL POLICY TITLE: Alcohol Beverage License Application Review Process POLICY and Alcohol Conditional Use Permit Standards NUMBER 707 ADOPTED: November 12, 1991 AMENDED OR REVISED: July 17, 2018 Page 4 of 5 - of the RBSS training, the permittee shall make available a domestic violence training session as provided by the Institute of Public Strategies. 14. (on -sale alcohol) The sale of alcohol shall not exceed the sale of food. With the annual renewal of the City business license, the business proprietor shall submit a statement clearly indicating total alcoholic beverage sales and total food sales. Said statement shall be subject to audit and verification by employees of the City, who are authorized to examine, audit and inspect such books and records of the license, as may be necessary in their judgment to verify that the sale of alcohol does not exceed the sale of food. All information obtained by an investigation of records shall remain confidential. 15. (on -sale alcohol) Alcohol shall be available only in conjunction with the purchase of food. 16. (on -sale alcohol with patio) Permittee shall post signs in the patio dining area, including all exits to outdoor seating areas, indicating that alcoholic beverages must be consumed inside the restaurant or patio area and may not be taken off -premises. 17. (tasting rooms) The requirements that alcohol be available only with the purchase of food and that alcohol sales not exceed food sales shall not apply to tasting rooms. 18.(tasting rooms) Sales of sealed bottles or containers (commonly known as growlers) for off -site consumption of the product manufactured by the master licensee may be sold and/or consumed at this location. 19. (tasting rooms) Hours of operation of tasting rooms shall be limited to between 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. with last call being at 9:00 p.m. 20. (tasting rooms) With the submittal of a business license for a tasting room, the Police Department shall provide an ABC Risk Assessment for each business applicant that indicates whether the business is considered a low, medium, or high risk. In the event that a risk assessment for the business allocates or more than 15 points, no business license shall be issued without the issuance of a Conditional Use Permit. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY 21 324 of 473 CITY COUNCIL POLICY TITLE: Alcohol Beverage License Application Review Process POLICY and Alcohol Conditional Use Permit Standards NUMBER 707 ADOPTED: November 12, 1991 AMENDED OR REVISED: July 17, 2018 Page 5 of 5 The sale of three -packs of 24-oz cans of beer shall apply retroactively to all existing off -sale CUPs where a condition exists limiting sales to no less than six-pack quantities. However, business wishing to avail themselves of this modification must conform with all regulations of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The Council may, at its sole discretion, choose to waive or modify any of the above conditions. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY 22 325 of 473 NATIONAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT ALCOHOL BEVERAGE CONTROL RISK ASSESSMENT DATE: 07/02/2018 BUSINESS NAME: Los Tito's Tacos ADDRESS: 917 S. Euclid Avenue, National City, CA 91942 OWNER NAME: Danny Damian OWNER ADDRESS: 515 Paseo Burge, Chula Vista DOB: 07/18/1981 (add additional owners on page 2) I. Type of Business ✓ Restaurant (1 pt) Market (2 pts) Bar/Night Club (3 pts) Tasting Room (1 pt) II. Hours of Operation Daytime hours (1 pt) Close by 11pm (2 pts) ,/ Close after 1 1pm (3 pts) III. Entertainment Music (1 pt) Live Music (2 pts) Dancing/Live Music (3 pts) ,/ No Entertainment (0 pts) IV. Crime Rate ✓ Low (1 pt) Medium (2 pts) High (3 pts) V. Alcohol Businesses per Census Tract Below (1 pt) ✓ Average (2 pts) Above (3 pts) Notes: V. Tract 120.02 allows for 4 on sale and 2 off sale. 3 on sale licenses are currently active in this tract. VIII. Arrested for disorderly conduct/ obstructing an officer in 2009. Arrested for fraud in 2010. DMV record shows driver license was suspended in 2009 for DUI. On 03/03/2012 Damian was contacted by police in La Mesa after he was in a speeding car flipping officers off with his middle finger. Revised: 8/16 1 of 2 23 326 of 473 National City Police Department VI. Calls for Service at Location (for previous 6 months) Below (1 pt) ,/ Average (2 pts) Above (3 pts) VII. Proximity Assessment (1/4 mile radius of location) ,/ Mostly commercial businesses (1 pt) Some businesses, some residential (2 pts) Mostly residential (3 pts) VIII. Owner(s) records check No criminal incidents (0 pts) Minor criminal incidents (2 pts) ,/ Multiple/Major criminal incidents (3 pts) ABC Risk Assessment Low Risk ( 12pts or less) Medium Risk (13— 18pts) High Risk (19 — 24pts) Total Points 13 OWNER NAME: DOB: OWNER ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: DOB: OWNER ADDRESS: Recommendation: Completed by: S. Shephard Revised: 8/16 2 of 2 Badge ID: 0402 24 327 of 473 RESOLUTION NO. 2018-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR BEER AND WINE SALES AT AN EXISTING RESTAURANT (LOS TITO'S) LOCATED AT 917 SOUTH EUCLID AVENUE. CASE FILE NO. 2018-13 CUP APN: 558-010-55 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit for the on -site sale of beer and wine at an existing restaurant for a property located at 917 South Euclid Avenue at a duly advertised public hearing held on December 17, 2018, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. 2018-13 CUP maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on December 17, 2018, support the following findings: 1. The proposed use is allowable within the applicable zoning district pursuant to a Conditional Use Permit and complies with all other applicable provisions of the Land Use Code, because alcohol sales for on -site consumption is a conditionally allowed use in the Minor Mixed Use District zone. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan. Alcohol sales are permitted, subject to a Conditional Use Permit, by the Land Use Code, which is consistent with the General Plan. In addition, a restaurant use is consistent with the Minor Mixed -Use land use designation contained in the Land Use and ATTACHMENT 3 25 328 of 473 Community Character (LU) element of the General Plan. Furthermore, the property is not within a Specific Plan area. 3. The design, location, size, and operating characteristics of the proposed activity would be compatible with the existing and future land uses in the vicinity, because no expansion is proposed, and the use would be accessory to the existing restaurant in the commercial area. 4. The site is physically suitable for the type, density, and intensity of the use being proposed, including access, utilities, and the absence of physical constraints, because the restaurant is existing and the proposed alcohol sales would be accessory to the restaurant use. The sale of alcohol is not expected to increase the demand for parking on the property. 5. Granting the permit would not constitute a nuisance, be injurious, or detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare, or materially injurious to persons, property, or improvements in the vicinity and zone in which the property is located, because the proposed use will be subject to conditions that limit the sale of alcohol and the hours that it will be available; no alcohol will be sold after 10 p.m. and will only be available with the sale of food; all business staff is required to receive Responsible Beverage Service & Sales (RBSS) Training. 6. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, and because there is no development, it has been determined that the proposed use is not a project per the Act; there is no calculable increase in traffic and no other impacts are anticipated. The project would not result in any physical changes to the environment. 7. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or necessity because beer and wine sales would contribute to the viability of the restaurant, an allowed use in the Minor Mixed -Use District zone. 8. Based on findings 1 through 7 above, public convenience and necessity will be served by a proposed use of the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for a Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 26 329 of 473 General 1. This Conditional Use Permit authorizes the sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption at an existing restaurant located at 917 South Euclid Avenue. Plans submitted for permits associated with this project shall conform to Exhibit A, Case File No. 2018-13 CUP, dated 6/21/2018. 2. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner shall both sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Department that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Deputy City Manager prior to recordation. 3. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in the Municipal Code. 4. This permit shall expire if the use authorized by this resolution is discontinued for a period of 12 months or longer. This permit may also be revoked, pursuant to provisions of the Land Use Code, if discontinued for any lesser period of time. 5. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked if the operator is found to be in violation of any Conditions of Approval. Planning 6. All sellers and servers of alcohol shall receive Responsible Beverage Service and Sales (RBSS) training, including all owners, and managers. The RBSS training must be certified by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Proof of completion of an approved RBSS program must be provided prior to issuance of a city business license. As part of the RBSS training, the permittee shall make available a domestic violence training session as provided by the Institute of Public Strategies. 7. The sale of alcohol shall not exceed the sale of food. With the annual renewal of the City business license, the business proprietor shall submit a statement clearly indicating total alcoholic beverage sales and total food sales. Said statement shall be subject to audit and verification by employees of the City, who are authorized to 27 330 of 473 examine, audit and inspect such books and records of the license, as may be necessary in their judgement to verify that the sale of alcohol does not exceed the sale of food. All information obtained by an investigation of records shall remain confidential. 8. Alcohol shall be available only in conjunction with the purchase of food. 9. The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be permitted only between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Friday through Saturday, and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday. 10. This permit does not include live entertainment. If in the future the applicant chooses to add live entertainment, the Conditional Use Permit shall be amended through the Discretionary Permit process. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of December 17, 2018, by the following vote: AYES: Quintero, Baca, Sendt, Yamane, Garcia, Flores NAYS: None. ABSENT: Dela Paz ABSTAIN: None. CHAIRPERSON 28 331 of 473 REVISIONS BLDG.A WALGREENS PLEBS SF �I .III (ACC 1_I-f U Rl I�I �Ii i P i f l I:� .eesal.e w S.Aces .' av-a srr3 nPACRs'= tone b �I �I y1' Pun . , eao4ER -'-'mn,E d tAw_ poCE 0S0N0) BLOG..m BLOCKBUSTER S.OSO SF MEESdi) E BLDG E CLOSE VIEW rung C' TIRE SHOE 5.59S se amMETMA. as ,. -.. E PLAZA BLVD. i SITE PLAN EXHIBIT; A CASE FILV / 1.01g -13 I T�! 6-21-)6 NOTE: WHERE ACCESS TO 0R WITHIN A STRUCTURE OR AN AREA IS RESTRICTED BECAUSE OF SECURED OPENINGS OR WHERE IMMEDIATE ACCESS IS NECESSARY FOR LIFE-SAVING OR FIRE- FIGHTING PURPOSES, THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO REQUIRE A KEY BOX TO 6E INSTALLED IN AN APPROVED LOCATION. THE KEY BOX SHALL BE OF AN APPROVED TYPE AND SHALL CONTAIN KEY(S) TO GAIN NECESSARY ACCESS AS REQUIRED REQUIRED BY THE FIRE CODE OFFICIAL. (CFC 503,6) AREA OF ENLARGEMENT NOTE: TRASH DUMPSTERS MUST BE LOCATED ON SMOOTH TRASH DUMPSTERS CONCRETE PAO. IF THE TRASH AREA IS ENCLOSED BY WALLS, THEY MUST BE SMOOTH, SEALED AND WASHABLE. It, 4,*50' OPaw SPACB •:�P NOTE: THE WORDS 'NO PARKING' SHALL BE PAINTED ON THE GROUND WITHIN EACH LOADING AISLE. NOTICE SHALL BE PAINTED IN WHITE LETTERS M N. 12° HIGH AND LOCATED 50 AS TO BE VISIBLE TO TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS. I0IA04PAmml6� - - r; S0,011 PAM OF II 6O90 SF o (NEW) L BLDG. 'E' ATLJI �`------- .L 4_ (PROJECT SPACEl 30n-011 IL. L • DOSKFLOV � GAS MEWRS f1 � VALVELOW �J E 79 t0 BLDG "E" - CLOSE VIEW LOS TITO'S TACOS 917 S. Euclid Ave. National City, Ca. 91 950 FIRE NOTES: 1. All exit doors shall be openable from the inside without Me use al a key. or any special knowledge or eHon,Main erdVenlraace shall display a sign which reads 'THIS DOOR TO REMAIN UNLOCKED WHEN BUILDING IS OCCUPIED.' This sign shall be in letters not less than 1 inch high and be on a contrasting background. 2. Floor level exll signs, exit markets and exit path markings shall be provided in all interior rated exit corridors of unsprindered group occupancies. 3. Separate plans for all fixed and mobile the proleclion equipment, and all fire alarm systems. shall be submitted to the Fire Marshal for approval prair to installation. 4. The installation of all automatic Fire sprinkler systems shall comply with UBC standard no. 36-1. 5. All commercial type cooking equipment shall be protected by an approved automalic hood and duct fixed fire extinguishing system per NFPA 17 and 96. Plans must be submitted to fire dept. prior to installation. 6. Provide one podable lire extinguisher, which has a classification of K lor the kitchen, within 30 IL of commercial cooking. 7. Provide a minimum of one 2A-10BC classification fire extinguisher within 75 ft. (ravel distance and must be mounted 3I- la 5 It. A.F.F., In visible location, determined by. the lire dept. Fire extinguishers may be inslalled in locked cabinels with the fire dept. approval. B. Interior finish shall comply wjlh UBC chapter 42. 9. All decorative materials shall be maintained in a (lame relardent condition. 10. Building occupants shall secure permits required by the Fire Dept. from the fire prevention bureau prior to occupying this building, 11. Building numbers shall be easily visible from the street, and contrasting in calor to the background. Where structures are MI the roadway an long driveways, a monument shall be placed at the entrance where the driveway iniersecls the main roadway. Permanent address numbers shall be displayed an this monument. Minimum 5" high numbers for residential, 6' high minimum for commercial. Size and location delermined by Flre Dept commercial. Size and location delermined by Fire Dept. 11. Provide a sign, with minimum 1 inch high letters, that reads 'Maximum Occupant Load ', Sign shall stale the maximum as determined by the build n�pt,. Post sign In a visible location. 13. The construction, remodel ar demolition of a building shall comply with article 67 of most went edition al UFC and CFC. 14. An approved set el plans (building, lire kitchen hood system, Ilre alarm, etc) shall be an the job site during construction. NO INSPECTIONS WILL BE MADE WITHOUT APPROVED PLANS. Cannot the lire dept. a minimum of 5 working days in advance to schedule all construction, temporary occupancy and final occupancy inspections •PROVIDE A UL 300 COMPLIANT FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM FOR THE COMMERCIAL COOKING AREA. SYSTEM SHALL PROTECT THE EXHAUST H000, PLENUM AND COOKNG APPUANCES. HAVE A UCEIISED CONTRACTOR SUBMIT PLANS FOR APPROVAL FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TO BE BY SEPERATE SUBMITTAL AND BY SEPERATE PERMIT. PLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY CRY OF NATIONAL CITY FIRE DEPT. PRIOR TO INSTAUATION- A C-15 UCENSEO FIRE PROTECTION CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM ALL WORK, A COMPLETE TEST OF THE SYSTEM BY FIRE DEPT. REOUIREO PRIOR 10 USE. OW\ Danny Damian (6 19) 933-84 17 CONTACT: Zlcharol Bertaux - (6 19) 602-890z- Desl6ner HEALTH/BLDG. DEPT. NOTES Building/Space Use: TACO SHOP Building Type: v-B Sprinklers: No Square footage: 1342 SO. FT. Occupancy Group:B AP N : 558-010-55 Water Supply: SWEETWATER MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY Sewer System: NATIONAL CITY WASTEWATER DISTRICT Type Food Facility: SINGLE SERVICE Alcoholic Beverages: NO Seating: YES Number Employees/Per Shift: 4ORLESS HEALTH DEPT/SANITATION NOTES 1. All looddelated and uemil-elaedequtpmeni shall meet be equiralenl la sanitation standards established by an Amerlan National Standards Itm;1Wle (AN511 acaediled M0Nam 2. AA food sand equipment rooms i700. Wage, wash, and smAuaraas, as well as Femmoms. anterooms.and employee dressing rooms midi nave mils. (hors and ceilings made bl doable smooth, nonabsete0 and washable malarial walls and ceilings must be el Moil cola. with a light !denim value eA 70 %IAV 0 higher. Floor swluces mot be carmen al a Nominal ins Boas end wags Mar a mmlmum nl4.cantinas tort. MIO a are' rats caner. Vinyl Iopsel base why niters accessble al [ode. 3. walR In valet closets, toilet rooms and MI0In 21L al I1OnI sides of mpbuls 5w11 be dl a ma -absorbent and wain-reslilan notarial17rshed to a height rl48'. 4.Wa8s behind all wet areas Ipolklen08 sinks, prep 0Inl¢. janitors Mnis,handrads, dishna0hm5, elc.kwsl be be nre.050etam and wale)+ealslam Inc PAN of OL IF.RP. Is an a[cepable material). 5. All aril doom shall he self closing, open adwmd, and light Ming. E. AI nth Om and dressing roam dears shall be sell+ -losing and Opt 7. P,wdde a minimum el 12 ai aunts per hour rennla0on Im all toilets, rut/eats, pats dories AM a maps 0lnss, enlawms. end tortoni :arnMOMS. Adegdde+-:mila:ion le be padded in.essing/cllanoe roans. 8. Trash dumistea masl be mated on saint owmete pad. If Me huh ilea is enclosed by wand, Play must be smooth, sealed. and *Kluble- (eg,.plasere0. rosoln and pah0ed.dc) A 00500g pmsi10 mhlirwn 50 ft candles, meaw'ed 30' on the floor la food peg. coking, packaging, washing alms, onmkirg nth utensils or eufpmem such as 'noises, slicers. odrden,m saws. nitre employee Wei/ is a facto and In all areas doing perieds el cleaning. to. slmdershid0s shall be prodded Im all lighting above load prep, seMng areas, work etas aid slmgae pas. II. Pam:ensil washing stied nos: he a minimum 3 cumpadmerd, rAmminlmum 18x18'a12' deep fill IGa20'a12' deep) canoamrenls,with a minimum Unflawed d at end, and There must bean 8' Integral oadapush II against a wall. 0aweve, all sines must he capable al acwm0daling the largest utensil to he noshed. Awmenanhingmachine aces na subsPoae for the sink reauimmenl. 12. Aseparate pied sInk N camparlmal minimum) with an (Neural &Reheat must be padded, unless otherwise apprwea by heallh dein. 13. 3 a 4-compammem too sink to be at least 18•a16-al2'deep lot 16'120112' deepl with a minimum 1B'draiogamd m each end. A seonale wet wane dump iWae shall be prodded ter disposal el drink m 1S2Sle ice 14. Handwash rhos muss be prodded In all loon pep areas, and musi belie sepm& Iram any who sink Pradlk dominantly mounted sbgle-uMce saP and paper towel [apemen la all nandsinls. I5. AB di awasheis and glasswuhers most be NSF approved and must aaln Indhen in a 3' trapped Boa sink kb a legal air gap. Flon sink to lie a midmm 12'a l2'. MO !envenom san1Mng machines mums be capable al dethellg minimum 180 degree ha rinse vase. Lon tempeature madlines mum; use chemical sadxting agents and be prodded villh a min. 140 degree wash and line Baler. i 6- All po5sleesi I sire¢ prep sinks, bar sinks and disnwasne s must drain Indirect Ica a Poor sink wit a I' legal all gap. 17. All he macul.. soda disowning machines, esprasa(appacino rll4ahtw5. hal loadwelf5,staam ladles, drpperwelts andmhigcr°tion eowensellon lines meat drain indirect to atom sank 18. Viler supply In all ce orulors sba8 be annealed MN al reproved reduced plessuemincl0le nacdla0 presenter. The lellel valve shall drain NWladlylo Smarr 0slth a legal air gas. 13 The jatalal sink laming( have a threaded outer Ito Tor hose atncnmaln and en approved ba0Hlare preseatw derke. No r halal dispensing systems a sbdo0 aloes to be ana0ed to mop sink lancet owlet (unless a 'slnllid.' plumbing amine Is Inslaged) 20. An approved bacmow prov+odlondedce mini be aopedy Irela0ed upstream 0f any 0mmlial hatard between the Staple Baler supply Hoses shall nisi be itchedla a laurels hose Mt unless an amain Padden pimplier is prodded. 21. NI!naiades car hard sinks will ham a combination Mucci atpembmg hued doable al umpiring water tempered to 100 degrees lfl. Sell-tlaSmg a ma0eo lancet to pollee al learn 15 seconds el wain wilh0utreaclhallon. 22. All plumbing, gas and elenl111 Imes awn be concealed tar great ea 01011 as DOWD!,. All exposed MA'S, plumping. etc shall be inslalled at least 6•oP Rom and 3/4' Pam MMB using Sandell am145. 23-6ll shelling art, cues pleas rpm sins -prep sinks and rano sinks. etc.) most be mefa4 24 Salad bars ail all salt-s&Ace moo mess, mull have hat. washable, Boar area 0rend1ng 36' an, in aII011ecIiaa. Scribal 4' cove base will also be required. 26. Steele gums arerequked for protection of all open displayed loads or areas where roads me prepped m seed he dose p,admlly:a non load Iacilly Demeaned. AI sneeaeguards scull comply with EH?-B85 reau5emenls 26. Any opana5k Inure. s. veins or an 9milm openings muss he mailed with eat -Wing sneers of minimum 16 mesh to de inch Windows to be Ned at Pond prep, ulen00 washing, open load and utensil menage alms. 27-MI floor manned equipment ngi he installed an minimum 6. noniron/ legs, asfors. m completely sealed ki position an a 4' high cult site mnlhmqu0ty coved base. Emulate equipment nil geed 4'swPay legs 01 Sealed to the ewnler unless ruddy movable. 28.1150ft mink ire of other a0500005 are sel6servke, or it tennis are 180Vid:d (hey must hepush Mon types, or Neer lyims Mete the lent canlaclsihe container al last one inch below the lint 29. BFI01d. F,en[h, accordion style and rdldm ands canna afaan M. to coed prep, ulens8 washing or °wWch9,01000 service areas. 30. A minimum bl 10-N01 candies or tight measaee 3P Dime Rea I prodded in welkin 1[bigpakd Slaage and ay storage looms Bdo( least 20-1ae1 candles Is prodded Miee load I pr0vrdedlar comma men'000lce. Mere Irnrh produce ei peapackage0loads me sale Of altered lotconsumpnaginside equipment such asteach-in and undo - miner reldgelalal0 In areas used for hanelwasbing, wmew-shing, egolpmwn and alma storage, and In toilet toms 31. Sinks to have springs) WUNe al teaching eadt compartment 31. Food prep sink compmmem(s) la he al least 18'48502' deep (or 16'(20•xl2• deep) Mm a IMnlmum 18' daintiest Sepale food prep suds to be prodded fa pleats antl induce. 32. The hal %alp ne:l0'Hgl be a commode' type cambia el amlamy sepaiying hol miler al sfdn9meweerhealer, lannerdae o1120 degrees (F)m all sinks. In poor heady demand lot all aims. et.. am added IOgelher m dn5mhk I0e mInlmum retched rewsw5 ale 33. Where Raves me Imate4 rare Innis GO h ham raleihealer, a cic pump Mudge Installed. in mono Inane Rut an, leaches the ridure al a tonnage al al least 120 deg. F. 34.000001 s, plumbing. or piping canal be inslalled across any aisle way Traffic area, or der opening. 35. Alulllple tuns. Nucleic l conduit or pipelines shall be Mood In in mused In an approval sealed encase¢. 36. Ni IIor10 waste shall be milled by means of indkal waste pipes into a non, sink Floor sinks are to be installed dull win me rmiuned Boa surface and lase soluble easily oemo'able safely raver gm:a. 37. Root Share be 50%exposed amen no access is presided for cleating or be in line Mlh the lied laced elevated Irwslmding equipment. 38.Ihe jualerial slni la be a minimum 24' by 36' Ilaayrrourr:ed hue. Maps shall be placed Ina gasman at allows tem in abdy Wiwi selling woos, equipment, 00n000es. 39. afer condensate or nasiewaler fnciuding mAC will Main Imo the yn0odm sink 40. Grease trap to be bated outside the feed seMce ac0wiymea, Iloh nth the finished Boer when litotes. Local waslew0Ies disllicl or building depa'hnenl to be [onladed far grease removal reg1lmna0s. 41hoer drains snag be installed in Iloms dial me water -gushed 1. deanbg and In meal where pressure spaylrgltxdi tor cleaning equipment are used, In 'esuoams. janitorial loom , sculleries, and al bars rein ware,azhing. Floor surfaces In weds pulsuad to lids shall he sloped H.50 to the fluor drains. 42. The Bur lnlSh vd11 cove a Snlaa1S solace Meer a5 equipment and walmays will have a light, teame only, 43. The palm used on walls and ceilings of all Y50Mn. Mod p,o Gallen, wait and storage areas win be a glass on semtalass enamel. Finish malnial shall be a Ugh] solar In food prep seas rw easy cleaning. 44. tier m 0sidUlion, samples el finishes to be submalled la Emllonmenlal Holm la appod as panted. 45. Cat storage roams shall be moulded Mill a union at sn0dno installed to held shallow cool down pens- not to exceed 4' In h0-IOh1.Slaace be neon shorting to he at lea518' hlgn 46. MOPS try storage shelving shall be a minimum al96linear 126 (meaSmfd with tiers) or 25%of Omura. Iwo prep. and Wink cream. v0Wew Is green. Shelving enact be at ream 18 MMus deep and Man a mimmum sic fames a111ae Poor surface. 47, All sours. gaps, openings It be or Godly sealed VICINITY MAP INDEX Or SHEETS T I - Title Sheet - Site Plan - Notes K I - Moor Plan - Equipment List - Details A I - Framing Man - ADA Restroom - Ref. Clg Plan P I - Plumbing - Waste * Drain Plan P2 - Plumbing - Water Gas Plan E I -E2-E3 - Electrical * Lighting Mans H I - hood Plan - Calcs - Roof Plan Captive Aire Hood Dwgs PROJECT DESCRIPTION/SCOPE THIS PROJECT ENTAILS THE TENANT IMPROVEMENT TO REMODEL A VACANT RETAIL SPACE INTO A MEXICAN RESTAURANT. WORK TO INCLUDE MISC. PLUMBING & GAS, MISC. ELECTRICAL, NON -BEARING PARTITION WALLS. AND INSTALLATION OF A TYPE I EXHAUST HOOD, EXHAUST & MAKE-UP AIR FANS. RESTR00M TO BE RELOCATED AND To BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CURRENT ADA ACCESSIBILITY REOUIREMENTS. GREASE INTERCEPTOR IS EXISTING AND TO REMAIf1, ALL LIGHDNG AND HVAC IS EXISTING AND TO REMAIN. N0 STRUCTURAL WORK TO BE DONE AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. ALL EXTERIOR SIGNS SHALL REAUTHORIZED UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. Disabled/ Handicapped Accessibilily Stalemeal 1, Al leas! one pinery entrance serving Me 'errant space 2. Accessible parking spaces serving Ile building/tenant must meet mein access requirements, space must he prouined, as well as accessible Mule 01 aped. I am the designer/ Maio In respnnsibledu,ge of tars project, I have inspected Ille slle/premioes and deleimtneO that existing conditions are in full compliance with Galen site accessiblily requkemems, to Me Weal required by law. I am the designer/ owner in r0,5100 le clarge el MN T.I. Project: I ban Inspected the premises and delennlped Thal MOIRE Ieslrooms, as pan of cots alleralton are accessible ac0ol01ng la general rest,ements. to the extent required by lax. Signature Dale Signature Dale B the bul0lng Inspector determines that lull compliance with unreal site act-ess1blly requirements is nol prodded. heeishe shall laming submittal Na detailed site plan for additional plan review and commenls.11e plans muss he stamped by we meld inspector prim to submttal (m plan review. If the building inspecla determines Thal lull compliance wim Cullenl Sle acces0iulily requirements is not provided. he/she shall require su0mi0al of a delaBed situ plan lm additional pion ledew and c0mmems.The plans must be stamped by me field Inspector prior to submittal Im plan review. NOTE: This project shall comply with the following; '2010 CRC, which adopts 2009 IBC and 2010 Calif. Ammendments. '2010 CEC, which adopts 2008 NEC and 2008 Calif. Ammendments. '2010 CMC, which adopts 2009 UMC and 2009 Calif. Ammendments. '2010 CPC, which adopts 2009 UPC and 2009 Calif. Ammendments. '2010 CFC, which adopts 2009 UFC and 2007 Calif. Ammendments. '2008 edition of the Calif, Energy Efficiency Standards Plans Prepared 15y: Date: Richard Bertaux - Designer \nVI \1I n c • LLJ 0 Rev. 1 2-13-1 2 Rev. 01 -02-1 3 Rev. 01 -2 1-1 3 V E� m V '.P 0 O o O mCTS O cV o U m � 75 cfa U v c- 4r ra w OG LOS TITO'S TACOS 917 S. Euclid Ave., National City, CA. 91950 12-11-12 N/A DRAM Br REB/AJB TITLE SHEET T1 2y ATTACHMENT 4 332 of 473 EQUIPMENT LIST REM :ON DESCRIPTION MFR.-MODEL LECT1111 CAL MLNGL AWS 11,1P. Pan PLUMBING cn IPREL ERE GAS COMMENTS REV151ON5 Rev. 12- 13- 12 1 EL01 2_ _t 3 4 4 F 5 I 6 7 , 8 I 9 10 , 11 , 12 TIN 13 , DRY MORAOEME MN6500LS 2ASMI HEATER -GAS COMMERCIAL• G2 GPHMAP0PAE11Y UNMAKE LOUN3 NO GUI AN W611CSORR1R01 JAm10NSSINK-24.121'.R0011MOWY00 IY MOM SOPw ES SIGRIOI SHELF SODA BOFSWRAP BULKCu2 TAM OPEN WN x-1H 000LEx- r- PthP I.a REMOTE COMPRESSOR FW WCLE&OH R00F1 CORM 5100A0ESHELNMG• CUM I.00ORAEACIIMME2ER METRO- W EOM. STELAE GB030H RYGMMI NM53601ERWU,R BY G.C. NEUNSQREOUN SY VE10OI BY VENOM pOIACOLO.0I ECM *FAGGED -ON ENIFL MEIR°- OREMIAL IMIET23F 120W1 12De-, v1411Y A VERIFY VERIFY SA DIRECT 01REL1 DIRECT CO. 112 I/O 1' TAP DIRECT !MOT 1/Y S26 PRAT OF C6 LLN, R, AW, STORAGE T1P TO COMM MIN.1 PER EMPLOYEE PNESET 0ELf•COHINNE2 EPNOw1ON OMN10 CREASE NI SAES MINN TOfLOOS MAX d GRA1EIMEACE➢TOA S0F•COMAMDM'AIRMTON 14 OPEN 15 1 16 17 110T 18 , 1.WRAP WO. PEEPSIHIIWIM MVWMM HALo0IM1xACAP G TONILOISP. WNL MUNN MAWS MS PER RANI 2•COAP P8TRHR (NNW WM'M WSTOP155 NW. TA500 DR EOUAL NITRO OREWYL WSIOMNS IN 1N 1/2 v2 1N 1N 2' MN 10 FLOOR SPA( 6 GSF4$E INf EA&P105 [MAIM FW013INRd GREASE W eaten • CONCAEn CO0D CUARRY TILE FLOOR COVE BASE DETAIL FACE OF CABMEN OR COATED OUARRYTRE BASE W7813/4' WIN, SANITARY 0000 19 , 20 1 21 NON TABLE WUNDEASHMF-4.2 404• W011R1AELEw9UM0E1191ELF-4W120 NUN W510MSS CMANNA 22 , 23 , 24 25 , 26 1 27 , 26 SFSUVERSHELF-ASPEN R.w S•MLL REmNCM'ET OATH HOOTOOOTABLE Etl REHMSEMIP SANDMEN, PIFP INAE 11E I EAHMI5111000-I0-0•-ULLMIW-W/MUA2S' PNIAM51 FM d MAKFAM P1R51S1EM RN: SUPPPESSIUNSY510A OPEN CUSTOM 25 EAGLE • °ANIMAL IMIETOW.50.I6 CAPNPEAR CAPTIr1 NET COMM. . M6w2Mv ISOv-1 115v-1 SA 1A 12A TAMP 1NP .121M D.G. DIRECT DIRECT IR II101EC1 MMMTO RO➢651A SEIFCONr/NEC EYWORATGN NOVAE FLEDNG A GASMMI-R13 29 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 1OAN 1MLE W UNDERMFLf -39 R M' 44UANER LOUHMEA RIP IMIFUIF W AIMO 45' GRDOLEW51PN0 MEN-SBM #04121 AKMSMP ATOME CMP. O15,0MSIN WHIN. 1111M-424 AUFSIAIPJ2'4026 MPF1w •ARMIN AM. TAOWOD(AUIL iR 1/2 2' OREM' OY4' 3/4• SN• SON INN 34 , PASS MAONNOBw• 54410 GUSTR5 -Fr 6.C. FACE OF CABINET 09 COMER 'SEW FOOT' CERAMIC 11LE COVE BASE PATH 3/8• RADIUS CORNER. STAINED CONCRETE FLOOR WE 2-PART EPO%YSE4LANT COVE BASE DETAIL 35 36 , 37 , 38 39 , OPEN REM SEANCELMR1Fn NDRCMIA DISPENSER 100N1SEINCC2R6RDR POO•CASH OMBRA CUSTOM LAVINIE BY w7101R 0610Y1 AA11NATE BY NMIOT 1261,1 120Y-1 SA AA ea. C.O. c.G IR INDIRECT OMNTO RWRSINNA NIEJSFINMIRPIOM 40, 0331 41 1 42 , 43 1 44 A 45 , 1.000A CEASG 00NR I1RMANMYR GLASSSNEEtEGUANI-M• M SAeAt-r'PM AEVE113E0313 WA1NFILT011110H SYS1FAIff*10EM4011N'.I TINE GGAI SORES CUSTOM MAC -ICP-3M CUSTOM I AMORTE AA C.O. I/O INORLEI SIEI.02MAM120 EVAPORATOR OMN ID ROOII SINK .46 , 47. 48 .1 49 , 50 I SEDUCED PRR911RE MIOOI W I YNVE NE MACHINE ICUBEFO-ON TOP OF IMPENS61 SODA AMC IDE DISPENSER TMGH COMMIXES GREASE 111( PWN er2G. HOSNITAN NM•320MNI BY YENOOA RURREAAIMI EMS2rlc • TO ROAM FINISH SCHEDULE 12/Y-t 120V-1 20A 5A C.C. AREA FLOORS BASE WALLS CEILINGS WASH & PREP AREAS JANITORIAL AREA QUARRY TILE 4" MIN. QUARRY TILE CONT. COVE BASE w- 3/0" RADIUS CORNER P.R,P. TO BLIP A.F.F. BEHIND WET AREAS - S.G.E. ELSEWHERE SMOOTH, WASHABLE VINYL COATED CEILING PANELS GUST. SVC AREA SELF SERVE AREA STAINED CONCRETES/ 2-PART EPDXY PAINT 4" MIN. "SLIM -FOOT" CERAMIC TILE BASE w- 3/8" RADIUS CORNER DRY WALL w/ SEMI -GLOSS ENAMEL. SMOOTH. WASHABLE VINYL COATED CEILING PANELS DRY STORAGE AREA STORAGE AREA QUARRY TILE 4" MIN. QUARRY TILE CONT. COVE BASE w- 3/8" RADIUS CORNER DRY WALL w/ SEMI -GLOSS ENAMEL. SMOOTH, WASHABLE VINYL COATED CEILING PANELS RESTROOM STAINED CONCRETE w/ 2-PART EPDXY PAINT 4' MIN.'SLIMf001" CERAMIC TILE BASE w- 3/8" RADIUS CORNER FRP TO 4,0'A.F.F.- S.G.E. ABOVE DRYWALL w/ SEMI -GLOSS ENAMEL. DINING - SEATING AREA STAINED CONCRETE w/ 2-PART EPDXY PAINT 4' MIN. 'SLIM -FOOT" CERAMIC TILE BASE w- 3/8" RADIUS CORNER BY OWNER ACCODSTIC CEILING PANELS I/O 12 0• 1' 3• 34' MA%HCT FOR ADA ACCESSIBILIEY WELT umRMT 1 ICE PAN 1 L J DAME SERA VJLVETOFIEORSOI CRAM 10MOOR NNE 011110 FM0RNNK LOCx110 OUTSIDE END PANEL (RIGHT SIDE) q sSALSA BAR - SNEEZEGUARD DETAIL FA,MORI �N �■A,RAAWITS 4YICOLE Be SE CUABNI•nLE•FLOOR COVE BASE DETAIL SLIM•FOOT CERAMIC TILE SASE 1V0111 3/B' MIN, SANITARY COVE SMOOTH CONCRETE FLOOR ENT -PART EFOKYPWNT COVE BASE DETAIL COOKLINE OUARRYTILE 4" MIN. QUARRY STAINLESS STEEL TILE CONT. COVE WALL FLASHING BASE w- 3/8" RADIUS CORNER SMOOTH. WASHABLE VINYL COATED CEILING PANELS WALK-IN COOLER QUARRY TILE TOP SET GALVANIZED COVE BASE w- 3/8" RADIUS CORNER, STUCCO GALVANIZED ALUMINUM STUCCO GALVANIZED ALUMINUM. Nole: Samples of floor IllDs, cove hale, wall and/ I telling materials may Le required to be submittal to heallh Rep!. for approval IN GI 111 1nslallallon. Light Galor wall and telling swla2es must hate a llghl relfecliye value (LIIY) o1 TO%Of grealor, All cave base must have a 3/8' minimum radius. Male: 2-part cpaxy palm for concrete Roofs shall he acid/grease resistant, or an approved USDA sealant. PICK-UP COUNTER SECTION NOTE: LOGS AIM R'ALLFINISIMSOTOILET ROOMS SIULLBE REFACED MN SM0011, NMo MN-DE9093A'11 MATERIAL DCLEVOM13 FILE MOO NOEL. RIMIER &IR/AGEING SNAIL OE P110600 Oh 1NC M11LSEUMTHE 1LOBNT1A HUH OF4FI.Pd9IUM1]URMALSAND 5U1t WATERCLWOXW'422%NFS.SE.C.P/I1 -SLIM-FOOT CERAMIC.TILE&40E WITH OM' MIN. SANITARY COVE SMOOTH CONCRETE FL000 w42-PARI [FOXY PAINT RESTROOM COVE BASE - WALL DETAIL N07G NA CHEMICAL OIEmCN SYSTEMS TO SI. UISTRL OOIN51IFAM OF AERONOMY MSTALEDM,OTLSTNLE NE URECTLY 01111WUWEECCIL,CONIACCTE11H177 E/l02Bllx MONISM FAUCETOl111A1. MIK NO, SPLASH CUAROS OR OMOTN TO RE O 21221R JNEMNS'J' H 15101 ANT MAIM P REP AMA ONSNELNMS. 110 PRESSED OF PLYW000 MPLLW IOONI ESS COl5PLEIELY ENCASED (It 1NKE41m/ (iDPENOTECOAIP4SSCA FOR CODER ION R049 NNE: NL E2B4MENTTO RE1w OLE65.O/RA5 00 CANNLEVEMO OPF 1AL FCR OEwW0 NN.ESS. NOTE: POSTARF FNIEF%FINGUILHFRSIMLLBEll5MLLE0 NIEMARETAME0 IA ACCORDANCE MI CENGO, NMI f 9ll.211) AND CMPim3,NR F 15 MN. uNl[�=mU SI2NARE AREA Y+e,O1P-IPtlL 25' JNPRGNAL PEA NATSIWAOE rt.IPA-kA51F alp M'ALILI COMER COMER tl-I'A9-0•L0. CID Gt1 3.1 /51 aAms-P Nom cLASSS PONIABLE FINEPTINGIIm1N FOR DEEP FAI FIRMS NIH. 1.50AUEN6PPAIIIY-'- 0 PER FOURFR1En5 NRHAC00MMi 221121Y EFAILIM, 0E LESS, SOE984.11.5.21 NNE: MANGIER!. El MOMS SHALLBE FROVOM NMI. MECIIAMCAL BEMUSE' SYSTEM GWP$E OA WO1101NG AMix. SDC1MFERFACH WAIFS CLOSETM0 UMIMLFND AMIN. 10CF1d PM HEAVYUSE AFRI3ATM S. NOTE BACKFLOWme*Em5W nO'Y1E5RWUIMIfOR NL EOUr.YENTIMT LSOIRELTLY W MIESIIO TO mE MIEN SUPPLY.TIASEOUIPMENTINAUOFSCOFTEE1TEA OPENERS,FSPOESSDMADNIRES, SODAMANNESAM I0I0I2ATIC FILL WA1F5 RAMS. APPROV0D AEIl6@PR6SIIIRE PRININCIPA IA20///LL00111 MUST 412042201120OPI109 °DACE. THE RELIEF VALVE MC51DRAIN IHDEECRYTO Amon salt NOTE; T-BAR CEILING AND HVAC 15 EXISTING AND TO REMAIN. Y;A 2F- <� ® 0-- C1<� WOKIIIE r-T � "AJ3l 21 CD © k+ircMun CUS1,;RICE NSA LID NOJ PROVIDE AMA. 91S2CMN OFCOUNIENAI1240 NOT%24• (NA ANA ACCW`MIIIIY. OD R. } I,P}y D Q D O sw un_ r 12 5 OD- u 0 6 DINWC/SEAINONFA 12' 411E T SIMWSALKLAII--22EATII`I lFm SLOPE IN i,'rl1VFLp1��L -RAM CLFMOMIMNfIi1CTW' Mm11 KM. MR: N I.1101*IR DOORS NUST 512110 DU1wAN1 AND 2ESOFIIOMYG NOTE: NA WENIOR DDm4SMUSI SWING 0111/MD PM BUMMED WM I SELF CLOSING 0ft10E 11MT T,5MPI F.'S W Im NM 1 I.T02.5.1 Min NUM ONO LEVEL UMW] MLA •RO'xdft AMA I101E19ORrpOMAOS DOE OUP IN IISF AIAIN.0192'' IAOP SII IK MUS7 impala n. 3 1r0XR16 mi2OCATONEE MTV. B' SRAM GURADS10BE MN%TIROMA2DSHiR mew. Da YMrJ1Mf0. RIIM NOON LM IMAM FA -M1.1RXRSLOOPPEE L14'�46 TLA0L1TNMNYIIFfC117N -r.s1N2 „1511�j7 eATLEAST NNW/ SAL MAIM MENAGE 'OCCUPANCY CALCULATIONS 1 DINING AREA - 627 SQ. FT =420CC, IKITCHEN AREAS - 593 5O. FT. = 3 OM I L TOTAL UGC. LOAD = 45 UGC. j FLOOR PLAN -LAYOUT SCALE 1/4"=P-0" Plans Prepared By: Date: Richard Beri aux - Designer Rev. 01-02-13 Rev. 01-21-13 ❑G LOS TITO'S TACOS 917 S. Euclid Ave., National City, CA. 91950 DATE 12-11-12 S=M :1/4`-1E-0" DRAWN TRY: REB/AJB FLOOR PLAN EQUIP, LIST FINISH SCHED. Ki 333 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 334 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Presentation of the City of National City's fiscal year 2020 budget priorities. Please scroll down to view the backup material. 334 of 473 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: January 22, 2019 AGENDA ITEM NO.: ITEM TITLE: Presentation of the City of National City's fiscal year 2020 budget priorities. PREPARED BY: Mark Roberts, Director of Finance DEPARTMENT: Finance PHONE: 619-336-4330 APPROVED BY: LZv/ah/ ,eaia EXPLANATION: The initial step for the City Council in the development of the City's annual budget is the establishment of budget priorities. This agenda item presents the budget priorities developed by staff for the upcoming fiscal year 2020 budget. For reference, staff is providing the current strategic plan document, which was approved by the City Council on March 21, 2017, and a list of the budget priorities discussed during development of the fiscal year 2019 budget. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: ACCOUNT NO. NA APPROVED: L7Z/V7reezL*. - FINANCE APPROVED: ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: This is not a project and, therefore, not subject to environmental review. ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION FINAL ADOPTION MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: NA BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: ATTACHMENTS: 1. Fiscal Year 2020 Priorities 2. Fiscal Year 2019 Priorities Update 3. Strategic Plan, 2017-2022 335 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2020 Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Community Priority Description Recreational Program Delivery (New) Improve current contract programs and attract new contract programs in order to provide a variety of programs to meet community needs. This would bring in additional revenue because of the 70/30% split for contract programs. Additional part-time staffing is needed in order to oversee expand programming and new revenues and/or other funding must be identified. Youth Program (New) Improve and increase youth programming at recreational facilities. These are free programs and would require some additional part-time staffing to lead youth program. Together We Can/ Neighborhood Preservation (Current) Continue to promote Together We Can campaign and support Neighborhood Preservation. Amortization (Current) Termination of up to five nonconforming uses in the Westside Specific Plan Area pursuant to Municipal Code Section 18.11.100.D. Affirmative Termination by Amortization. Historic Properties Designations (Current) Process the historic designation of properties initiated by the City Council for designation and listing on the local historic properties list, including public hearings before the Planning Commission (recommendation) and the City Council. Consider initiation of additional 79 properties for designation as recommended by the NCHS. Develop and implement pending permit notification process for NCHS review of properties not on the historic properties list. Climate Action Plan (Current) Update Climate Action Plan, including updated greenhouse gas inventory and review/revision of implementation measures, monitoring, and reporting. Quality of Life Program/Neighborhood Preservation (New) Continue Quality of Life Program (remove shopping carts, bulk trash items, posters, weeds, etc.) Strategic Plan Functional Area: Development Priority Description Upgrade Service Delivery in Library (Current) Library meeting room audio-visual system upgrade.(estimated completion in late FY19 or early FY20) Update Needs Assessment and Administer CIP Requests (Current) Update Capital Needs Assessment and develop Funding Plan. Continue to use City Public Works forces to deliver smaller Capital Projects. Coordinate with Finance Department for training on Project Accounting Module. Page 1 of 4 1/6/2019 336 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2020 Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Development Priority Description Electronic Work Order and Asset Management System (New) Pilot GIS-based electronic work order and asset management system. Parking Management Action Plan (New) Utilize Parking Authority to fund parking management solutions. Pilot on-line parking permit management system. Economic development (Current) Continue funding adequate staff & resources to meet program needs to conduct ongoing projects. Housing development (Current) Identify funding and begin implementation of housing development programs and projects focused on very low to moderate income needs. Participate in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment process to identify future housing needs. Solicit housing developers to construct affordable housing units. Balanced Plan (Current) Joint City/Port land use planning for the Marina District, including Environmental Impact Report, General Plan Amendment, Land Use Code Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Local Coastal Program Amendment, and development entitlements. Regional Housing Needs Assessment - RHNA (Current) Participate in and inform the development of the RHNA allocation methodology as an active participant in the SANDAG Technical Working Group (TWG) to address lower income disproportionality. Housing Policy Development (Current) Development of housing policy leading up to the next Housing Element Update. Harbor Drive Multimodal Corridor Study (Current) Participate in Port and multi -jurisdictional planning efforts for the Harbor Drive Corridor. TOD Overlay (Current) Develop and implement transit -oriented development planning within the TOD areas of the Westside Specific Plan. Land Use Code Updates (Current) Miscellaneous cleanup and clarification revisions to the Land Use Code. State -mandated Land Use Updates (Current) Miscellaneous cleanup and revisions to the Land Use Code required by changing State regulations (e.g. Street Vending, Accessory Dwelling Units, Massage, Marijuana, Density Bonus, etc.) Page 2 of 4 1/6/2019 337 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2020 Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Operations Priority Description Long-range financial planning (Current) Develop 5-year forecast for operation budget. Pension funding (Current) Continue to look for opportunities to augment pension trust fund. Employee Development and Training (Current) Maintain efforts to identify and provide thraining that supports employee groth and development. Succession Planning (New) Work with all departments to provide oppurtunities for employees to work in active assignment to prepare them for upward mobility and organizational stability. Expand Core Values (Current) Relaunch five core values and consider expanding based on employee feedback. Maintain Wellness Program (Current) Continue prioritizing employee health and develop programs and events to promote wellness. Financial Management Systems (New) Implement Project Accounting Module for Capital Improvement Program Application Infrastructure (New) Implement upgrade and integrate GIS into application portfolio CyberSecurity (New) Advanced threat cybersecurity assessment Page 3 of 4 1/6/2019 338 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2020 Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Public Safety Priority Description Code Conformance (Current) Ongoing. Replacement of single full-time position with two part-time positions has allowed for greater scheduling flexibility and performance of more work at a lower cost. Parking Enforcement (New) Pilot new Parking Enforcement Technologies Field Technology (New) Establish program to replace dated Panasonic / Toughbook Upgrade (portential 5 Year Lease) Explorer Pipeline (Current) Continue practice of training explorer to become public safety officer and formulate program that develops pipeline through neighborhood services, code compliance, and police. Page 4 of 4 1/6/2019 339 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2019 Priorities Update Staff Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Community Priority Description & Status Update Asset management & disposition (Successor Agency Properties) (Current) Successor Agency properties transferred to the City in accordance with the Long Range Property Management Plan in late fiscal year 2016. Properties scheduled for disposition placed on the real estate market. Two properties (12th & A Avenue and Palm & Plaza Blvd parcels) have been sold to date. Palm & Plaza Blvd parcel being developed for housing. Staff continue to work on the redevelopment on the Successor Agency parcels off of Bay Recreational program delivery (Current) In April 2019, Community Services will launch ActiveNet, the online registration and point of sale system. Negotiations in progress for Port of San Diego to take over operations at the Aquatic Center. Estimated transfer is early 2019. Community Services and the City Manager's Office created a new online flip newsletter. Community Services improved marketing by attending local school functions, utilizing constant contact to send program and event information via email to past participants, and increasing social media presence by posting more often. Homeless outreach (Current) Attempt to quantify what has been done and what difference has been made. Evaluate effectiveness of outreach program to ensure it is meeting City's needs. Parking management (Current) New program for residential, commercial vehicle, and recreational vehicle permitting. License plate reader technology, to assist with enforcement. "Smart meter" pilot program (designated area). Volunteerism (Current) Launch of volunteer management software on hold due to vacancies and lack of resources. Development of additional volunteer programs on hold due to vacancies and lack of resources. Expanded volunteer recognition planned, to include long-term volunteers is also on hold due to vacancies and lack of resources. Third annual Volunteer Appreciation Dinner held in September 2018. Community events (New) Expansion or increases to community events: - A Kimball Holiday: New attractions in 2018 included a snow hill and Ferris wheel. Increased marketing helped attract 5,000 people over the course of 2 evenings. - Miss National City pageant: Improved production quality and stage design. - Tower of Terror: Canceled by the FA due to changes in the Fire Code. - skate park youth programs on hold due to vacancies and lack of resources. Page 1 of 4 1/6/2019 340 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2019 Priorities Update Staff Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Community Priority Description & Status Update Service delivery (New) Library meeting room audio-visual system upgrade, postponed to fiscal year 2020. Conversion of WINGS office (Library) into tutoring space, estimated completion in late fiscal year 2019. Together We Can (New) Program for National City Neighborhood Preservation. Strategic Plan Functional Area: Development Priority Description & Status Update Needs assessment (Current) Presented Capital Needs Assessment addressing facilities, infrastructure, parks, and fleet to City Council with funding options on April 3, 2018. Economic development (Current) Ongoing - Ensure economic development program is supported with additional funding, etc. Consider other revenue options, including attracting more foot traffic to retail centers such as South Bay Plaza. Promote a retail recruitment strategy including developing opportunities for small businesses and entrepreneurship. Housing opportunities (Current) Ongoing - Consider best practices to promote housing development in National City and update housing needs for National City. Consider all housing opportunities, including inclusionary, affordable, and micro unit developments. Consider new sources of revenue for affordable housing development and to incentivize infill housing development and accessory dwelling units. Historic resources preservation (Current) Assessed historic property needs and funding options as part of FY 2019 CIP. Strategic Plan Functional Area: Operations Priority Description & Status Update Pension funding (Current) Irrevocable supplemental pension trust approved by City Council in current budget. Execution of trust documents and establishment of trust expected in March 2018. Page 2 of 4 1/6/2019 341 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2019 Priorities Update Staff Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Operations Priority Description & Status Update Training & development (Current) Some realignments made to align staffing with the City's strategic objectives. Staffing alignment will be continually monitored as the organization continues to evolve. Number of employees attending training has increased. Efforts to identify and provide training that supports employee growth and development and fulfilment of City-wide and departmental priorities will continue. Strategies to reduce employee risk of injury and facilitate a successful and timely return to work when injuries do occur have been developed. Improvement seen in reduction of employee risk of injury and successful and timely return to work when injuries do occur. Cost -benefit analysis underway on some proposed adjustments. Some proposed adjustments subject to collective bargaining. Long-range financial forecasting (Current) Draft 5-year projections prepared. Currently generating projection for economic development. Technology infrastructure (Current) Council Chambers A/V equipment update expected to be completed June 2018. Seven out of ten installed, three more remaining. Aquatic center turned over to the port. Firewall upgrades, to enhance network security, and web content filtering. Workplace improvement (New) Police Department flooring replacement (main floor). 40% completed. Fee Study (Current) Completed - adopted by City Council October 2018. Page 3 of 4 1/6/2019 342 of 473 City of National City Fiscal Year 2019 Priorities Update Staff Priorities Strategic Plan Functional Area: Public Safety Priority Description & Status Update Fire / emergency medical deployment strategies (Current) Completed - one-year pilot program; seeking permanent status in January 2019 Code conformance (Current) Ongoing enforcement of code comformance. Training (Current) POST (Police) training ongoing. Post training reqiurement maintained. Technology (Current) Completed - Police computer -aided dispatch production storage update. Infrastructure (Current) Inventory of non-functioning security cameras at City facilities being prepared. Expanded storage for specialized Police vehicles pending move in. Page 4 of 4 1/6/2019 343 of 473 w- CALIFORNIA �^ NATIONAL MTV' s .. [NCORPOA AT�� RA CEGIC PLAN 2017-2022 Objective # 1 — Provide Quality Services a) Practice the five core values (Commitment, Customer Service, Courtesy, Communication, and Collaboration) with our diverse customer base. b) Align workforce with City's objectives and provide training and support necessary to fully develop employees, Boards, Commissions, and City Council. c) Expand public access to City services and information, by maintaining our website and making digital records accessible to the public. d) Pursue public safety goals and objectives and enhance disaster preparedness (Police, Fire, Emergency Medical Services, and Homeland Security). e) Analyze internal processes for efficiency and implement technology solutions where feasible. Continue efforts to automate and streamline work processes. Objective # 2 — Achieve Fiscal Sustainability a) Prepare effective budget, close deficit, accurately forecast funding sources, manage investments wisely, provide consistent financial reports, maintain clean audits, resolve findings/deficiencies in a timely manner, and update finance and budget policies. b) Continue labor/management partnerships with an emphasis on strategic deployment and total compensation issues. Address long-term pension liability and other postemployment benefits (OPEB). c) Establish economic development programs to retain and attract businesses, stimulate new investments, and increase revenues. Evaluate and update fee schedules to promote development and recover costs. d) Continue to implement plans to fund replacement reserves and to finance the acquisition, replacement, and maintenance of the City's fleet, facilities, and other assets. e) Build cooperative and sustainable partnerships with community organizations, schools, and other public agencies in the efficient and cost effective delivery of services. Objective # 3 — Improve Quality of Life a) Enhance crime prevention and emergency service through community outreach, procedural justice, critical incident response, City/regional partnerships, and employee development. b) Pursue green initiatives and build a sustainable city by implementing the climate action plan and energy roadmap. c) Help organize community events and support social gatherings that benefit the total community. d) Update sign ordinance to improve community character and draw attention to important gateways, corridors, and intersections with improved signage and wayfinding. e) Support Pier 32 (GB Capital Holdings) expansion plans and work with San Diego Unified Port District and its tenants to fund public process and public improvements. 344 of 473 w- CALIFORNIA �^ NATIONAL MTV' s .. [NCORPOA AT�� RA CEGIC PLAN 2017-2022 Objective # 4 — Enhance Housing and Community Assets a) Continue providing housing opportunities at all income levels and develop programs to improve existing conditions. Adopt a comprehensive long term strategy to address homelessness. b) Complete Paradise Creek Apartments and Educational Park. Continue to plan and build transit -oriented developments/districts. c) Maintain and improve City's infrastructure and find alternative funding to construct public facilities, park improvements, street maintenance, and other capital needs. Complete comprehensive needs assessment and establish priorities through funding options. d) Preserve and promote cultural assets and historic resources, such as Granger Music Hall, Kimball House, Stein Farm, and the Depot. Formalize a public art program that provides funding for art and culture through a "percent for art" program. e) Administer real property assets and property management plans to achieve the City's long term goals. Objective # 5 — Promote a Healthy Community a) Expand opportunities for walking and biking through the development of community corridors and safe routes to schools consistent with the National City General Plan and Bicycle Master Plan. b) Continue to provide affordable City programs, activities, and services that are accessible for all users, including individuals with disabilities (Americans with Disabilities Act). c) Enhance neighborhood services programs, such as graffiti abatement, parking enforcement, and code enforcement and increase efficiency with new technology. Adopt a parking management plan as part of an update to the Downtown Specific Plan. d) Implement neighborhood action plans and continue amortization efforts by working with residents and businesses. e) Advance National City wellness programs for youth, families, seniors, and City employees that encourage a healthy lifestyle and develop a workplace safety program. 345 of 473 CC/CDC-HA Agenda 1/22/2019 — Page 346 The following page(s) contain the backup material for Agenda Item: Update on Port of San Diego Activity (City Manager) Please scroll down to view the backup material. 346 of 473 Item # 01/22/19 Update on Port of San Diego Activity (City Manager) 1. Balance Plan EIR Update 2. Prop 68 Grant Opportunities a. Granger Music Hall b. Pepper Park Expansion 3. Bayshore Bikeway Update 4. Parking Action Plan- Truck Parking 5. Harbor Drive Multi -Modal Study 6. SANDAG Military Working Group Access Study 7. Aquatic Center Transfer 347 of 473 PROJECT TITLE: APPLICANT/ PROPONENT: LOCATION: REFERENCE: San Diego Unified Port District P.C. Box 120488 San Diego, California 92112-0488 (619) 686-6283 NOTICE OF PREPARATION of a DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NATIONAL CITY BAYFRONT PROJECTS & PLAN AMENDMENTS (UPD EIR-2018.232) San Diego Unified Port District, City of National City, GB Capital Holdings, Pasha Automotive Services National City, California (see Figure 1) California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Sections 15082(a), 15103, 15375. The San Diego Unified Port District (District) wilt be the Lead Agency in preparing an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project (proposed project or project) identified above. The District is soliciting input and feedback from various agencies, stakeholders, and the public pertaining to the scope and content of the environmental information that will be included in the EIR. For certain agencies, this may be germane to statutory responsibilities in connection with the proposed project, An agency may need to use the proposed project's E[R when considering its permit or other approval for the project, The project description, location, and possible environmental effects of the proposed project are contained in the attached materials. Due to the time limits mandated by state law, your comments on environmental concerns must be sent at the eariiest possible date but no later than 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 31, 2019. Comments should be mailed to: San Diego Unified Port District, Planning Department, 3165 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92101 or ernailed to: abuzaiti{a.portofsandiego.arq. A public scoping meeting regarding the proposed EIR will be held on Thursday, January 24, 2019 from 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the National City Aquatic Center, 3300 Goesno Place, National City, CA 91950. For questions on this Notice of Preparation, please contact Anna Buzaitis, Program Manager, at (619) 686-7263, Signature: r Lesley Nishihira3 Director, Planning Date: ' 348 of 473 This page intentionally left blank. 349 of 473 C ^h y G i10° FORT �5 San Diego Unified Port District P.O. Box 120488 San Diego, California 92112-0488 NOTICE OF PREPARATION of a DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT for the NATIONAL CITY BAYFRONT PROJECTS AND PLAN AMENDMENTS (UPD #EIR-2018-232) INTRODUCTION Publication of this Notice of Preparation (NOP) initiates the San Diego Unified Port District's (District's) environmental review and analysis of the National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments Project (project or proposed project) pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The NOP is the first step in the CEQA process. It describes the proposed project and is distributed to responsible agencies, trustee agencies, involved federal agencies, and the general public. As stated in State CEQA Guidelines Section 15375, the purpose of the NOP is "to solicit guidance from those agencies as to the scope and content of the environmental information to be included" in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The NOP provides an opportunity for agencies and the general public to comment on the scope and content of the environmental review of a proposed project. The proposed project would include: • Changes to land and water use designations in the District's Port Master Plan (PMP); • Amendments to the City of National City's (City's) Local Coastal Program (LCP), General Plan, Harbor District Specific Area Plan, Land Use (Zoning) Code, and Bicycle Master Plan that would include changes to jurisdictional boundaries; changes to subarea boundaries; and changes to land use, specific plan, and zone designations (City Program — Plan Amendments); • Construction and operation of a recreational vehicle (RV) park, modular cabins, dry boat storage, up to four hotels, and an expanded marina (GB Capital Component); • Construction and operation of a rail connector track and storage track (Pasha Rail Improvement Component); • Closure of Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street as well as West 28th Street between Tidelands Avenue and Quay Avenue and redesignation of the area from Street to Marine -Related Industrial in the District's PMP (Pasha Road Closures Component); • Construction and operation of Segment 5 of the Bayshore Bikeway (Bayshore Bikeway Component); and • Construction and operation of hotel, restaurant, retail, and/or a combination of tourist/visitor-serving commercial development north of Bay Marina Drive and the -1- 350 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation potential closure or narrowing of Bay Marina Drive west of Marina Way to through vehicular traffic (City Program - Development). The proposed PMP Amendment (PMPA) and corresponding LCP Amendment (LCPA) to clarify jurisdictional land use authority, redesignate land uses and the balancing of commercial and maritime uses is herein referred to as the "Balanced Plan." The Balanced Plan, GB Capital Component, Pasha Rail Improvement Component, Pasha Road Closures Component, and a portion of the Bayshore Bikeway Component are all within the District's jurisdictional boundaries. Consequently, changes proposed by these components would require an amendment to the PMP, collectively "Port Master Plan Amendment Component" or "PMPA Component," as follows: • Incorporate the Balanced Plan, GB Capital Component, Pasha Rail Improvement Component, and the alignment of the Bayshore Bikeway into the PMP; • Remove the Street designation for the street closures associated with the Pasha Road Closures Component and redesignate these areas as Marine -Related Industrial; and • Additionally, approximately 11.50 acres of Balanced Plan, located mostly on the GB Capital site east of the mean high tide line and owned in fee by the District, would be added to the PMP. Most of the proposed Bayshore Bikeway Component and the entire proposed City Program are within the City's jurisdiction. Consequently, the City Plan Amendments would be as follows: • Remove the approximately 11.50 acres of the Balanced Plan, located mostly on the GB Capital site east of the mean high tide line and owned in fee by the District, from the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Harbor District Specific Area Plan, and Land Use Code to reflect changes in land use and jurisdictional authority; • Incorporate seven parcels north of Bay Marina Drive and adjacent rights -of -way into the Harbor District Specific Area Plan; and • Amend the Bicycle Master Plan to reflect the realignment of the Bayshore Bikeway. Future development within the City's jurisdiction may require Coastal Development Permits (individually, CDP and collectively, CDPs) and other development permits such as planned development permits, conditional use permits, subdivision/parcel maps, street vacations, and other discretionary or ministerial entitlements to implement the project. PROJECT PROPONENT(S)/APPLICANT(S) • San Diego Unified Port District • City of National City • GB Capital Holdings • Pasha Automotive Services PROJECT LOCATION As depicted in Figure 1, the proposed project is located in National City, California, within the jurisdictions of the San Diego Unified Port District (District) and City of National City. The location of a project component is referred to as a project site, and collectively the locations of the project components are referred to as the "project sites." The project sites are generally accessed by Marina Way, Bay Marina Drive, and Tidelands Avenue, and are generally bordered by industrial uses and Civic Center Drive on the north, the Sweetwater Channel on the south, -2- 351 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge (Sweetwater Marsh Unit) and Interstate 5 to the east, and the National City Marine Terminal (NCMT) to the west. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project includes both landside and waterside components, as well as amendments to the District's PMP and the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Harbor District Specific Area Plan, Land Use Code, and Bicycle Master Plan. The following subsections describe the key project components in detail and as depicted in Figure 2. Marina District Balanced Land Use Plan Component (Balanced Plan) The proposed project would include adoption and implementation of the National City Marina District Balanced Land Use Plan (Balanced Plan), which covers an approximately 60.9-acre area north of the Sweetwater Channel in the District's land use jurisdiction, as shown on Figure 3. The Balanced Plan proposes to reconfigure areas within the Marina District that are designated within the PMP as Park/Plaza, Commercial Recreation, Marine Terminal, Marine - Related Industrial, Recreational Boat Berthing, and Street land uses. The Balanced Plan's proposed land use redesignations and associated policies proposed for the amendments to the District's PMP and the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Harbor District Specific Area Plan, Land Use Code, and Bicycle Master Plan are necessary to carry out the GB Capital Component, Pasha Rail Improvement Component, and Pasha Road Closures Component, as described above. Consequently, the project components are intrinsically part of the Balanced Plan. The specific transportation improvements, public access improvements, and land/water use designation changes included in the Balanced Plan and how they relate to the different project components are described below. Transportation Improvements The Balanced Plan consists of several proposed transportation improvements: • Realign Marina Way from its existing alignment to form a curve that rounds out to the west when traveling toward the Balanced Plan area and connect to the proposed new park entrance (Proposed/new Road D1). Utilities would be relocated from the existing Marina Way right-of-way (ROW) to the realigned Marina Way ROW. The realigned Marina Way ROW, which is proposed to be approximately 70 feet wide, is identified as Road D3 (realigned Marina Way) in Figures 3 and 4. The GB Capital Component, discussed below, proposes a configuration of the realigned Marina Way that is slightly varied from the configuration proposed under the Balanced Plan. • Close West 32nd Street east of Tidelands Avenue, allowing for the realignment of Marina Way as proposed above, as shown on Figure 4. Potential relocation of utilities is also proposed. • Add a connector rail track to provide an additional point of connection between the existing rail yard along the west side of Marina Way and the east side of the National Distribution Center, north of the Balanced Plan area, to the existing rail line north of the existing West 32nd Street and west of Tidelands Avenue. A storage track may be also be provided north of and parallel to the connector rail track. The area between the realigned Marina Way/Road D3 and connector rail track would form a buffer area that could accommodate the required rail service area (i.e., 15-foot-wide setback from rail track) on the southern side of the connector rail track. The location of the connector rail track is shown on Figure 3. This connector rail track is also part of the Pasha Rail Improvement Component discussed below. -3- 352 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation • Close the southern half of the existing Goesno Place south of West 32nd Street to vehicular traffic and relocate the northern portion of the road to the east, as shown as "new Road D2" in Figure 4, providing access to the GB Capital/Pier 32 Marina site from the proposed realigned Marina Way. Potential relocation of utilities is also proposed. • Shift the southern terminus of Tidelands Avenue to the east, as shown in Figures 3 and 4 (identified as Proposed Road D1), to accommodate a reconfigured historical first point of rest (FPR). Public Access Improvements The Balanced Plan consists of several public access improvements: • Increase Pepper Park by over 2.5 acres —approximately 1.52 acres to the northwest, and approximately 1-acre to the north and east —as shown on Figure 5. The Pepper Park expansion, which may also include a reconfiguration of the layout of the existing Pepper Park, has not yet been designed; however, several potential park components are being analyzed in this EIR as a "worst -case scenario" for environmental impacts. • Provide a 100-foot habitat buffer from the delineated wetlands west of the Wildlife Refuge (Paradise Marsh) and a 200-foot building setback from the western edge of the Wildlife Refuge. Vehicular parking and low -impact non -motorized uses such as public access trails and bike paths could be located between the habitat buffer and building setback. The habitat buffers are shown on Figure 13. • Provide a north —south public access corridor, allowing visual, pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency vehicle access within the existing alignment of Marina Way, as shown on Figure 5. The north —south public access corridor would range from 20 to 40 feet wide and be centered on the existing 20-foot-wide view corridor at Pier 32 Marina. The primary use of the north —south public access corridor would be for pedestrians and bicyclists, and no vehicular parking, permanent structures, or other impediments to access would be allowed. The Bayshore Bikeway may be routed through this corridor. Modifications to this north -south public access corridor is proposed as part of the GB Capital Component, as discussed below. • Provide an east —west public access corridor, allowing visual, pedestrian, bicycle, and emergency vehicle access within the existing alignment of West 32nd Street, as shown on Figure 5. The east —west public access corridor would range from 14 to 40 feet in width. This east —west public access corridor would be for pedestrians and may also include an ancillary bicycle path; however, no vehicular parking, permanent structures, or other impediments to access would be allowed. Modifications to this east -west public access corridor is proposed as part of the GB Capital Component, as discussed below. Proposed Pepper Park Expansion and Reconfiguration Pepper Park is proposed to be expanded by approximately 2.54 acres, from approximately 5.22 acres to approximately 7.76 acres. Existing amenities include a boat launch ramp, picnic tables, restrooms, fishing pier, floating boat dock, and playground equipment. The park has approximately 71 parking spaces and consistent with the District's ordinances, is open between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Although the Pepper Park expansion has not yet been designed, for the purpose of providing a "worst -case scenario" for the environmental analysis, it is anticipated that the following features may be implemented: -4- 353 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation • Reconfiguration of the existing Pepper Park layout, which may include a mixture of hardscape (e.g., paved plazas, shade structures) and new landscaping (e.g., landscaped berms, open lawn). • An amphitheater. • An interactive fountain/splashground. An optional feature to the Pepper Park expansion is the City -requested relocation of the City - owned historic Granger Hall to Pepper Park. If Granger Hall is relocated to Pepper Park, it could be used as a restaurant or a special event center. The park expansion/reconfiguration could result in additional opportunities for larger and more frequent organized events. No revisions to the boat launch ramp facility are proposed. Proposed Land and Water Use Designation Changes The Balanced Plan proposes several changes to existing land and water use designations (see Figure 3 for proposed land/water use configuration and roadway locations): • Increase the overall designated Commercial Recreation area by approximately 1.17 acres, for a total of 17.39 acres. The land use changes would encompass the area located generally southeast of the realigned Marina Way. Additionally, approximately 0.3 acre of Commercial Recreation would be redesignated to Park/Plaza to allow for the expansion of Pepper Park (see below). See GB Capital Component, for a description of the development proposed for this area. • Increase the designated Park/Plaza area by approximately 2.54 acres, for a total of 10.33 acres. The land use change would occur to the north, west, and east of the existing Pepper Park (also see discussion under Proposed Pepper Park Expansion and Reconfiguration). • Reduce the designated Recreational Boat Berthing area by approximately 0.59 acre, for a total of 16.80 acres, by redesignating the land area (i.e., jetty) along the southern boundary of the marina that separates the marina from Sweetwater Channel from Recreational Boat Berthing to Commercial Recreation. This area is currently designated with water use designation of Recreational Boat Berthing and is proposed to be revised to the land use designation of Commercial Recreation to better reflect the existing and proposed condition of the area being land and not water. This jetty is part of the development proposed by GB Capital, as described below in GB Capital Component. • Reduce the designated Marine Terminal area that is the historic FPR by approximately 0.62 acre. Specifically, Pepper Park would be expanded to the northwest into approximately 1.52 acres of the designated Marine Terminal area; however, the designated Marine Terminal area would be expanded eastward (north of the existing footprint of Pepper Park) by approximately 0.90 acre (due to the entrance into the park area being narrowed and realigned — see "new Road D1" on Figure 3), for a total of 6.76 acres (see Figure 3). • Reconfigure and reduce the designated Marine -Related Industrial areas north of the proposed realigned Marina Way by approximately 0.4 acre, for a total of 6.49 acres. • Reduce the designated Street land use area by 2.15 acres, for a total of 3.14 acres. Table 1 summarizes the Port Master Plan (i.e., District jurisdiction) land/water use changes proposed by the Balanced Plan. -5- 354 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR Notice of Preparation December 2018 Table 1. Balanced Plan Area Existing and Planned Land and Water Uses for the Port Master Plan Land/Water Use Existing Area (acres) Proposed Area (acres) Difference (acres) Marine Terminal 7.38 6.76 -0.62 Marine Related Industrial 6.89 6.49 -0.40 Commercial Recreation 16.22* 17.39 +1.17 Recreational Boat Berthing 17.34 16.80 -0.54 Park/Plaza 7.79 10.33 +2.54 Street 5.29 3.14 -2.15 Total 60.91 60.91 -- *Includes areas that are currently designated "Commercial Tourist" in the City's Local Coastal Program, but are being incorporated into the PMP to reflect the District's land use authority and jurisdiction. Proposed Use Modifications to National City Aquatic Center No land use changes are proposed to the aquatic center as part of the project; it is located in Pepper Park, and the Pepper Park expansion is anticipated to be designed around the facility. The proposed project includes modifications to existing operational restrictions in the CDP for the facility that limit existing operations and utilization of the facility'. Specifically, the project proposes to amend the CDP to eliminate the following restrictions: • Class sizes are limited to a 1:6 instructor -to -student ratio. • Water equipment rentals (e.g., kayaks, rowboats) must be docent supervised. • Participation in aquatic center programming shall not be denied based the financial ability/inability to pay. • Existing buoys in the Sweetwater Channel, south of Pier 32 Marina, are in place to prevent encroachment into the adjacent refuge. • Most aquatic center participants will arrive in groups by bus. The project also proposes to expand the allowed uses at the aquatic center to provide for more flexibility and to increase public utilization of the facility. More specifically, a portion of the facility may be used for educational aquaculture or environmental conservation uses, including small- scale research and development opportunities. In addition, the project proposes to relocate the buoys located south of Pier 32 Marina in order to allow non -motorized watercraft to access the area farther to the east in Sweetwater Channel. The buoys would be relocated to the east side of the San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) property and former railroad bridges, north and south of the channel, as shown in Figure 6. The proposed relocation of the buoys would still prevent encroachment into the refuge. With the operational restrictions reduced and the allowed uses modified, it is anticipated that more people would visit the aquatic center under the proposed project. For example, it is also reasonably foreseeable that there will be more public interest in individual water equipment rentals, which are currently prohibited by the CDP. While these proposed modifications have separate and independent utility, they are being analyzed as part of the proposed project for efficiency. -6- 355 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation GB Capital Component In addition to the land and water use redesignations and transportation improvements, needed for the GB Capital Component noted above in the Balanced Plan discussion, the component would include construction and operation of an RV park, modular cabins, dry boat storage, up to four hotels, and additional moorings and improvements to the marina. In addition, as discussed above, this component would implement a new road alignment for Marina Way, public access/view corridors, and bicycle and pedestrian paths. All of the landside improvements would generally be developed within the Commercial Recreation land use designation that is proposed as part of the Balanced Plan. The majority of this component would be developed in the first phase, which is anticipated to be operational by 2022. The second phase includes up to four hotels, which would be operational based on market demand, anticipated to be developed by 2025. The GB Capital Component would incorporate native plantings and non-invasive ornamental plants, drought -tolerant, low -maintenance plants that are well adapted to bayfront conditions throughout the project area. Hardscape materials, consistent with the character of the existing marina, would include permeable paving (porous asphalt, concrete pavers, and decomposed granite). The development would include view corridors and trails that would be connected to the adjacent marina and Pepper Park. Low-level lighting that is sensitive to the adjacent refuge and wetlands is proposed. Figures 7 and 8 show the Phase I and Phase II conceptual site plans. Figures 9 through 12 depict renderings of the hotels, dry storage, and proposed 11-story hotel tower. Phase 1 would include the following: • Construct and operate up to 135 sites at a proposed RV resort, including ancillary facilities such as a laundry room, swimming pool, and other support facilities. Privacy plantings and/or fencing would be incorporated into the design of the RV Park. This would generally be located on Parcels B3, B6, B7, and B8 of the Balanced Plan. • Construct and operate approximately 40,000 square feet of dry boat storage, which would be capable of storing up to 210 boats. The boats would be kept in racks housed within up to five separate structures, each with a maximum height of 65 feet, in the area west of the realigned Marina Way/Road D3 roadway. The dry boat storage facilities would be constructed of COR-TEN® steel and perforated metal; the ground surface under the storage racks would be porous gravel or pavers. Two 500-gallon fuel tanks (diesel and gasoline) with containment would be located on the site. Siting dry boat storage in this location (west of the proposed GB Capital alignment of the realigned Marina Way/Road D3 roadway, as shown on Figure 7) would require the following modifications to the land use configuration identified in the Balanced Plan: o Narrowing and shifting the realigned Marina Way/Road D3 to the southeast from the alignment identified in the Balanced Plan. o After narrowing and shifting the realigned Marina Way/Road D3, a portion of the area between the proposed connector rail track (see Pasha Rail Improvement Component) and realigned roadway would be changed to a Commercial Recreation land use to allow for dry boat storage instead of the wider realigned Marina Way/Road D3 that is in the Balanced Plan. This road narrowing and shifting from a width of approximately 70 feet under the Balanced Plan, to a width of approximately 50 feet under the GB Capital Component, would accommodate approximately 1.3 acres of Commercial Recreation space northwest of the realigned Marina Way/Road D3. -7- 356 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation o Overall, the GB Capital Component would have approximately 0.6 acre more Commercial Recreation space than the Commercial Recreation space in the Balanced Plan. This is due to the shifting/narrowing of the realigned Marina Way/Road D3 (as discussed above), which would not only accommodate Commercial Recreation space for dry boat storage northwest of the realigned roadway, but the southeastward shift would also reduce the size of the Commercial Recreation parcels immediately southeast of the realigned roadway. • Construct and operate up to 60 modular cabins, which would serve as independent accommodations with kitchenettes, bathrooms, and sleeping quarters, generally on Parcels B1 and B11 of the Balanced Plan. The jetty area east of the mean high tide line is currently under a long-term lease between the District and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). • Construct a new, approximately 10,000-square-foot, two-story administration/recreation building adjacent to the existing marina buildings. The new structure would be constructed of wood and glass materials. • Construct a new, approximately 4,000-square-foot, two-story building with restrooms, laundry facilities, and staff support services in the vicinity of the existing marina buildings. The building would be constructed of wood and glass materials, and would be located on Parcel B2; • Construct a new, approximately 4,000-square-foot maintenance building and associated approximately 8,200-square-foot maintenance yard, northeast of the proposed dry boat storage described above. The existing maintenance space on Pier 32 Marina would be relocated into this new maintenance area. As with the existing space, the new maintenance area would be used to store maintenance items such as parts, tools, paint, and supplies such as those for cleaning and landscaping. The new maintenance area is also proposed to be used by boat owners (or authorized personnel) to perform light boat maintenance such as cleaning, waxing, touch-up painting, and minor repair activities for boat electronics and engines. Heavy repairs or painting boat bottoms would not be performed on site. This maintenance space would also have a separate wash down area for the boats. • Construct and maintain an approximately 24-foot-wide public access corridor down the existing alignment (north —south orientation) of Marina Way, in the general area identified in the Balanced Plan. This corridor, identified as the "Central Promenade" on the GB Capital plans (see Figures 7 and 8), would accommodate mainly pedestrians and bicycles but would also serve as a driveway for the occasional car or RV. The northernmost part of the Central Promenade would be 50 feet wide. • Construct and maintain a minimum 24-foot-wide, east —west view corridor with a parking area, drive aisle, and an approximately 6-foot-wide sidewalk through the existing Pier 32 Marina parking lot, in the general area identified in the Balanced Plan. • Construct and maintain a minimum 24-foot-wide, north —south view corridor with a roadway and sidewalk through the proposed Road D1. • Construct and maintain a minimum 24-foot-wide north —south view corridor with a roadway and sidewalk through the proposed Road D2. • Construct and maintain a Class I bicycle path approximately 30 feet east of Parcel B6 and west of the Wildlife Refuge/Paradise Marsh, within the western part of the "low - impact uses buffer" identified on Figure 13. This location is between the potential Routes -8- 357 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation 1 and 3 of the Bayshore Bikeway in this area (see Bayshore Bikeway Component below). • Construct and maintain a pedestrian path and other approved recreational amenities generally east of Parcel B6 of the Balanced Plan area and west of the Wildlife Refuge/Paradise Marsh, within the western part of the "low -impact uses buffer" identified on Figure 13, with public access connecting to the existing marina, consistent with the Balanced Plan. • Construct and maintain up to 20 moorings in Sweetwater Channel, south of the jetty, the majority of which (13 mooring) would be east of the mean high tide line and outside District jurisdiction. • Construct an approximately 620-foot-long and 8-foot-wide floating dock that includes up to 30 fingers, which together total approximately 7,000 square feet, in the channel south of the jetty and proposed modular cabins. Gangways that are approximately 80 feet long and 5 feet wide are proposed to be located on the east and west ends of the floating dock to attach it to the jetty. The floating dock would be open to the public during operational hours at the marina. • Construct an approximately 580-foot-long and 8-foot-wide dock with two 80-foot-long and 5-foot-wide gangways, which together total approximately 5,000 square feet, within the existing marina basin north of the jetty. This would allow additional boats to be side - tied to the dock. • Allocate an area for future development of infrastructure to support aquaculture in Sweetwater Channel east of the proposed moorings, the majority of which would be east of the mean high tide line and outside District jurisdiction. The portion outside of District jurisdiction is on Caltrans property. • Construct and maintain an approximately 4,400-square-foot pier platform at an angled southwesterly orientation, of which approximately 1,200 square feet would be over water (with an angled width of approximately 70 feet —one side having a length of approximately 100 feet, and the other side having a length of approximately 50 feet), with floating docks (approximately 120 feet long and 6 feet wide), and two gangways (approximately 80 feet long and 5 feet wide) immediately northeast of the National City Aquatic Center. When not in use (i.e., placing boats from dry boat storage into the water or removing them from the water), the pier platform and gangway would be open to the public. The pier platform, floating docks, and gangways, which would be located within part of the park expansion area of the Balanced Plan (northeast of the Aquatic Center), would serve the dry boat storage area proposed as part of the GB Capital Project, as well as the general public as a viewing platform. Phase 2 would construct and operate up to four hotels of varying sizes and room counts: • Construct and operate an up to three-story hotel with up to 40 rooms generally on Parcel B1 of the Balanced Plan. • Construct and operate an up to four-story building, the first floor of which would include approximately 16,500 square feet of retail space. The upper three stories would house a hotel with up to 60 rooms. All would be constructed generally on Parcel B6 of the Balanced Plan. • Construct and operate an up to 11-story hotel with up to 282 rooms generally on Parcel B3 of the Balanced Plan. -9- 358 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation • Construct and operate an up to four-story hotel with up to 81 rooms, also generally on Parcel B3 of the Balanced Plan. In order to accommodate the hotels on Parcels B3 and B6, it may be necessary to remove up to 65 RV spaces. Parking for the GB Capital Project would be available on site. Phase 1, as described above, would include up to 406 vehicle parking spaces, including one vehicle parking space within each RV site. Phase 2, as described above, would include up to 820 vehicle parking spaces, including one vehicle parking space within each RV site. Additionally, GB Capital is seeking permission from SDG&E to use a parcel east of the existing marina to accommodate additional parking. Pasha Rail Improvement Component Existing Rail Operations in National City Trains that service the NCMT and surrounding industrial properties in the City of National City are owned and operated by BNSF. Empty railcars are currently stored at the BNSF National City Yard, the Cesar Chavez BNSF Yard (south of Downtown San Diego), and the NCMT on - terminal rail ladder.2 The BNSF National City Yard, which is owned by BNSF, currently serves several industrial customers in the area, including Pasha. The movement of railcars outside of the NCMT is dictated by rail labor union contracts. For example, movement of railcars north of the switch location near the intersection of Civic Center Drive/Harbor Drive must be done by BNSF. In addition, although BNSF can store empty railcars at the BNSF National City Yard, moving those empty railcars to the on -terminal rail ladder requires a BNSF crew to move the railcar to the switch location first. Once south and west of the switch, Pasha's crew can move the railcars. Other than when a train is being moved on or off the terminal, BNSF rail crews are not available, which creates an operational constraint for Pasha. Independent of Pasha, BNSF has a vehicle transport business that uses some space in National City, on BNSF-owned properties located east of Tidelands Avenue, north and south of Bay Marina Drive. The BNSF operation consists of an inbound/southbound train that uses a mix of bi-level and tri-level railcars, which are loaded with vehicles for BNSF customers, not Pasha customers. Those railcars are unloaded in National City, on the BNSF-owned property, and become the empty railcars that Pasha may use for its outbound/northbound rail operations. The BNSF inbound/southbound operation results in approximately 12-15 tri-level railcars per week that are not used by Pasha and, as a result, sit empty on the rail ladder where Pasha builds/loads outbound trains. Approximately once per week, BNSF pulls the empty tri-level railcars out of the area. Bi-level railcars can fit taller/higher-profile vehicles, such as SUVs, which cannot fit on the tri- level railcars. A bi-level railcar can fit 10 vehicles. A tri-level railcar can fit 15 vehicles. The use of bi-level railcars versus tri-level railcars is dependent on the type of vehicle that will be placed on the railcar. High -profile (i.e., taller) vehicles, such as SUVs, are the bulk of Pasha's rail transport; these vehicles require bi-level railcars and do not fit in tri-level railcars. Based on historical data (between 2013 and 2017), approximately 40% of the vehicles that arrived at NCMT by vessel were distributed by rail, whereas the remaining 60% were distributed by truck.3 2 A rail ladder is a staging area with sufficient rail capacity to build and spot trains. 3 The percentage split for transport by rail versus transport by truck is dependent on the type of vehicle/Pasha customer (e.g., Kia or Volkswagen). For example, Kia was a Pasha customer through early 2017, and Kia required that Pasha transport all Kia vehicles on rail. The split can vary from year to year, depending on the customer mix and their respective business requirements. -10- 359 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation Proposed Rail Improvements on Lot K Existing train activities on and around NCMT are constrained by the freight train operating windows and limitations on the length of trains. Moreover, the frequent insufficient supply of empty railcars, as well as related storage (see discussion above under Existing Rail Operations in National City), further constrains train operations. The Pasha Rail Improvement Component would include construction and operation of a connector track and a storage track west of the realigned Marina Way/Road D3 roadway identified in the Balanced Plan. This project component would allow Pasha to Toad trains more efficiently, as discussed below. The alignments of the connector track and storage track are shown on Figure 14, and are also identified on Parcels B4 and B5 of the proposed Balanced Plan (see Figure 3). The connector track would connect the existing rail and loop track on the NCMT, west of the National Distribution Center, to additional railcar storage at the existing BNSF National City Yard, just east of the National Distribution Center. The storage track would provide additional railcar storage by adding a second track parallel to and north of the connector track. Figure 14 identifies the locations of the existing National Distribution Center, the existing BNSF National City Yard, the proposed connector track, and the proposed storage track. The project does not propose to remove any existing rail track. Connector Track The BNSF National City Yard has eight tracks, switches, and can hold approximately 50 rail cars. BNSF can use the rail yard either for multi -level auto rail cars or for storage for manifest train rail cars, giving them more flexibility for operations. As discussed above, the connector track portion of the Pasha Rail Improvement Component would improve efficiencies for Pasha's operations at NCMT. The improved efficiencies are due to Pasha no longer requiring BNSF to pull empty railcars north of the NCMT to the switch near Civic Center Drive and Harbor Drive and then having to send them back to the NCMT on the loop track, which can take a considerable amount of time because it requires dependence on BNSF rail crews. Instead, empty railcars could be pulled on the connector track directly from BNSF's National City Yard to the loop track on NCMT, resulting in reduced maneuvering and quicker train build times. The reduced maneuvering and quicker train builds would result from (1) the shorter distance required to pull the railcars (from the BNSF National City Yard instead of up to the switch near Civic Center Drive/Harbor Drive) and (2) the ability to avoid relying on BNSF crew availability to pull the railcars through the switch location by using Pasha employees using a small railcar mover. A comparison of the existing and proposed train movements is shown in Figure 15. Notably, although the connector track would reduce the number of maneuvers and the time associated with these actions, it would not significantly increase throughput compared to existing conditions.4 The connector track, however, could better assist Pasha in accommodating the additional vehicle throughput analyzed in the NCMT Tank Farm EIR. The NCMT Tank Farm EIR analyzed a projected annual increase in throughput of 210,818 vehicles. That EIR assumed that existing trains run 6 days per week (Monday through Saturday), for a total of 300 days per year, and that the project would thus require additional annual railcar space for up to Throughput is a function of land availability, vehicle dwell time, and accessibility to empty railcars. In terms of land availability, the connector track would not increase available land, but under the Balanced Plan there would be a net loss of land available for Pasha. Regarding vehicle dwell time, the connector track would not necessarily decrease dwell time because dwell time is largely dependent on the vehicle manufacturer and the dealer (i.e., when the dealer is able to take possession of the vehicle). In terms of accessibility to empty rail cars, the connector track could theoretically increase the accessibility of empty railcars by providing a more direct link to the BNSF National City Yard; however, the availability of the empty railcars would still be dependent on whether BNSF has empty railcars and provides them to Pasha. -11- 360 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation 94,868 vehicles, which could be accommodated by adding a Sunday train to the weekly train schedule. Storage Track The proposed storage track would add approximately 2,000 feet of train storage, which would accommodate the storage of approximately 18-20 railcars. The storage track would allow the approximately 12-15 empty tri-level railcars, that Pasha cannot use on a weekly basis, to be stored off the on -terminal rail ladder. However, providing an additional railcar storage area would not significantly increase vehicle throughput, particularly if only tri-level cars are available, because they are unable to accommodate larger vehicles such as SUVs, which is the bulk of Pasha's rail transport needs. (The purpose of bi-level versus tri-level railcars is discussed above under Existing Rail Operations in National City.) The consumer demand for SUVs, and other high -profile vehicles such as trucks, is market driven and heavily dependent on gasoline prices. This new car market trend for SUVs and trucks, versus traditional sedans (i.e., low -profile vehicles), is anticipated to continue for the foreseeable future; thus, bi-level railcars are anticipated to continue to be in high demand at NCMT. While these tri-level railcars are waiting to be removed from the NCMT rail ladder by BNSF, the railcars impact Pasha's regular rail activities, causing inefficiencies for Pasha to build a train. The storage track, therefore, would provide a place for these empty tri-level railcars to be stored, off the main on -terminal rail ladder. Having these empty railcars off the on -terminal rail ladder would allow regularly scheduled inbound/southbound trains to improve efficiency upon arrival. A Tess congested rail ladder on terminal creates a smoother, more routine flow of railcars, which supports more efficient operations for Pashas. Existing Pasha Operations in National City Pasha handles vehicles, breakbulk and general cargo in National City. Although Pasha's operations in National City involve both vehicle and non -vehicle throughput (i.e., breakbulk and other general cargo), the vast majority of Pasha's operations involve vehicle throughput, as shown in Table 2 for years 2013 through 2017. Table 2. Pasha Vehicle and Non -Vehicle Throughput from 2013-2017 Year Vehicles (Units) Containers (Metric Tons) Breakbulk (Metric Tons) 2013 361,372 15,484 37,295 2014 401,180 18,916 20,916 2015 425,890 6,928 78,966 2016 451,612 370 6,265 2017 371,827 105 41,812 Average 2013-2017 402,376 8,361 37,051 Source: Port District Maritime Division, November 2018 Having railcars available at NCMT in a more consistent fashion allows Pasha to use employees more efficiently because there is more certainty that the necessary railcars will be available for operations and reduces the need to rely on BNSF. -12- 361 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation As shown in Table 2, the amount of non -vehicle throughput is a relatively small share of Pasha's overall operations. Therefore, the proposed project assumptions provided below consider the reasonably foreseeable worst -case scenario for the proposed project, based on the maximum theoretical vehicle throughput. Existing Pasha Operations in Balanced Plan Area — Lots J and K Pasha currently handles vehicle throughput on Lot J (south of 32nd Street, north of the Pepper Park parking lot) and Lot K (north of 32nd Street, between Tidelands Avenue and Marina Way), both of which are identified in Figure 16. Lot J and Lot K are approximately 3.35 acres and 11.37 acres, respectively, and together total approximately 14.72 acres. The criteria used to determine this "existing" per acre per year calculation includes the total number of vehicles processed in a given year and the total acreage used to process that quantity of vehicles. Vehicular throughput is a function of land availability, vehicle dwell time, accessibility to empty railcars, and market demand for vehicles (which can also influence the former two factors). Due to those limiting factors, the annual vehicle throughput at NCMT has varied since 2013, as shown in Table 2. As noted in Table 2, in the most recent complete year (2017), Pasha processed 371,827 vehicles, whereas the year before that (2016), Pasha processed 451,612 vehicles. Given this fluctuation, District staff concluded that a baseline that accounts for vehicle throughput over a five-year average provides a more accurate measure of the current/baseline level of vehicle throughput against which to evaluate the proposed project impacts. Therefore, the baseline for this analysis is the average annual vehicle throughput from 2013 to 2017 (i.e., the average of the five years of vehicle throughput that occurred prior to issuance of the NOP). Additionally, the total amount of acreage used has also varied annually since 2013, with an average of 180 acres used from 2013 to 2017, as shown in Table 3. Table 3. Pasha Annual Acreage Used 2013-2017 Year Acreage Used6 2013 158 2014 170 2015 191 2016 191 2017 191 Average 2013-2017 180 Source: Port District Maritime Division, November 2018 Based on the same methodology for calculating "existing per acre annual vehicle throughput" that was used in the EIR for the "National City Marine Terminal Tank Farm Paving and Street Closures Project and Port Master Plan Amendment" (NCMT Tank Farm EIR),' the existing 6 Approximate net acreage available for auto storage. Acreage with buildings or other uses (i.e., maintenance, landscaping) is not included in this total. San Diego Unified Port District. 2016. National City Marine Terminal Tank Farm Paving and Street Closure Project & PMPA Draft EIR. Available https://www.portofsandiego.org/public- -13- 362 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR Notice of Preparation December 2018 annual throughput is 2,235 vehicles per acre,8 which equates to a total of approximately 32,899 vehicles per year for Lots J and K collectively, as shown in Table 4. Table 4. Existing Vehicle Throughput on Existing Lot J and Lot K Site Existing Acreage Existing Throughput/Existing Baseline (2,235 vehicles/acre/year) Lot J 3.35 7,487 Lot K 11.37 25,412 TOTAL 14.72 32,899 Proposed Pasha Operations in Balanced Plan Area — Lots J and K Implementation of the proposed project would result in all of Lot J, as well as a portion of Lot K, being transferred from use by Pasha to use by GB Capital as part of the proposed GB Capital Project component. This would decrease the land available within the Balanced Plan area for Pasha's operations by approximately 8.23 acres (from the existing 14.72 acres to approximately 6.49 acres). In the NCMT Tank Farm EIR, the methodology used to calculate the proposed vehicle throughput, or maximum theoretical throughput, consisted of a conservative analysis that factored in a dwell time' of 10.9 days, and a maximum number of vehicles per acre (154 vehicles per acre). The proposed vehicle throughput is the maximum theoretical capacity of each acre of terminal land. This methodology identified that up to 5,157 vehicles per year could be handled on each acre at NCMT.10 The difference between the proposed vehicle throughput per acre (5,157 vehicles) and the "existing throughput" per acre was what was evaluated in the NCMT Tank Farm EIR as the potential throughput increase associated with the NCMT Tank Farm project. The same methodology that was used in the NCMT Tank Farm EIR to determine the potential throughput increase can be used to determine the change in throughput potential associated with the proposed project. A maximum theoretical throughput of 5,157 vehicles per acre per year is still applicable because the factors that are included in that calculation are still valid, including the maximum number of vehicles that can fit on one acre at one time (154 vehicles), and the use of a 10.9 day dwell time, which provides for a more conservative analysis than if the current average dwell time of over 20 days was used to determine maximum theoretical throughput. As discussed above, under the proposed project Pasha's operations within the Balanced Plan area would be decreased by approximately 8.23 acres (from the existing 14.72 acres to records/all?keyword=Tank+Farm+EIR&topic=&location=&category=93 &sort_by=search_api_relevance&sort_ord er=DESC. x 402,376 vehicles - 180 acres = 2,235 vehicles/acre; 2,235 vehicles/acre is the "existing per acre baseline;" 14.72 acres x 2,235 vehicles/acre = 32,899 vehicles/year. 9 Dwell time is the time between when a vehicle enters NCMT and when it leaves NCMT by either truck or rail. The average dwell time from 2014 to 2017 was over 20 days; 10.9 days provides for a more conservative analysis. 10 [(154 vehicles/day/acre) x (365 days/year)] - 10.9 day dwell time = 5,157 vehicles/acre/year. -14- 363 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR Notice of Preparation December 2018 approximately 6.49 acres). As shown in Table 5, this lower acreage (6.49 acres) still has the potential to result in an additional 570 vehicles per year. Table 5. Existing and Proposed Vehicle Throughput for Lot J and Lot K Site Existing Acreage Existing Throughput/ Existing Baseline (2,235 vehicles/ acre/year) Proposed Acreage Proposed Throughput (5,157 vehicles/ acre/year) Net Change (Proposed — Existing Lot J 3.35 7,487 0 0 -7,487 Lot K 11.37 25,412 6.49 33,469 8,057 TOTAL 14.72 32,899 6.49 33,469 570 Pasha Road Closures Component Pasha also proposes the Pasha Road Closures Component, which includes closure of Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive on the north and West 32nd Street on the south, as well as West 28th Street between Quay Avenue and Tidelands Avenue. Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street is an access road to the back gate of the NCMT; it also serves as an access road to the main entrance of Pepper Park. The existing roadways bifurcate marine terminal operations. Their closure would increase operating efficiencies by eliminating certain internal fences and drive aisles and consolidating the two truck -away locations down to one, a reduction in the truck -away footprint of approximately 0.5 acre." The road closures total approximately 6.07 acres, of which approximately 5.76 acres is within the District's jurisdiction, and the remaining approximately 0.31 acre is within the City's jurisdiction. The area of the road closures located within the District's jurisdiction would require changing the land designation from Street to Marine -Related Industrial. This land use change would require a PMPA. Table 6 summarizes the land and water use changes proposed for the Balanced Plan area and the Pasha Road Closures Component within the District's jurisdiction. The approximately 0.3 acre of the Pasha Road Closures Component (the portion between the mean high -tide line north to Bay Marina Drive) within the City's jurisdiction would require an amendment to the City's General Plan Circulation Element, Roadway Classifications. The road closures are proposed to occur in two phases: (1) Tidelands Avenue between West 28th Street and West 32nd Street and (2) Tidelands Avenue between West 28th Street and Bay Marina Drive as well as West 28th Street between Tidelands Avenue and Quay Avenue. " The truck -away footprint is an off -terminal location where trucks are loaded. Off -terminal in this case is where security credentials (e.g., a Transportation Worker Identification Credential) are not required. Currently, because of the non-contiguous lots used for Pasha operations, there are two truck -away locations. If the Pasha Road Closures Component is implemented, there would be more contiguous space for Pasha's operations, with less fencing, and the ability to reduce two truck -away locations down to one. Having fewer barriers within Pasha's operational footprint reduces the amount of required travel and the number of movements, and allows trucks to load more efficiently at one location versus two locations. -15- 364 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR Notice of Preparation December 2018 Table 6. Balanced Plan and Pasha Road Closures Components - Existing and Planned Land and Water Uses Areas within the District's Jurisdiction Land/Water Use Balanced Plan - Existing Area (acres)* Balanced Plan - Proposed Area (acres) * Pasha Road Closures - Existing Area (acres)** Pasha Road Closures - Proposed Area (acres)** Proposed Totals Marine Terminal 7.38 6.76 0.00 0.00 6.76 Marine- Related Industrial 6.89 6.49 0.00 5.76 12.25 Commercial Recreation 16.22*** 17.39 0.00 0.00 17.39 Recreational Boat Berthing 17.34 16.80 0.00 0.00 16.80 Park/Plaza 7.79 10.33 0.00 0.00 10.33 Street 5.29 3.14 5.76 0.00 3.14 Total 60.91 60.91 5.76 5.76 66.67 Note: The Pasha Road Closures (Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street, and West 28th Street between Quay Avenue and Tidelands Avenue) are not part of the Balanced Plan. *Within the Balanced Plan area. `" Within the Pasha Road Closures area. -Includes 11.46 acres of land that is currently designated "Commercial Tourist" in the City's Local Coastal Program, but is being incorporated into the PMP to reflect the District's land use authority and jurisdiction. For simplification purposes, this existing "Commercial Tourist" acreage is included in the "Commercial Recreation" acreage. As noted previously, vehicle throughput is a function of land availability, vehicle dwell time, accessibility to empty railcars, and market conditions. The road closures would have no effect on vehicle dwell time, accessibility to empty railcars, or market conditions, and is proposed to be used for truck away activities, and not explicitly for vehicle storage/processing. However, to provide a more conservative analysis, this EIR will analyze the 6.07 acres being used for Pasha's vehicle throughput operations. Maximum theoretical throughput on 6.07 acres of land could be up to 31,303 vehicles per year12, as shown in Table 7. Table 7. Existing and Proposed Vehicle Throughput for Pasha Road Closures Component Site Acreage under Proposed Project Existing Throughput Proposed Throughput (5,157 vehicles/acre/ year) Difference (Potential minus Existing) Pasha Road Closures 6.07 0 31,303 31,303 "- Existing Throughput = 0 vehicles; Potential Throughput = 5,157 vehicles/acre/year (see Footnote 10); 6.07 acres x 5,157 vehicles/acre/year = 31,303 vehicles/year -16- 365 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation Summary of Existing and Proposed Pasha Operations — Lot J, Lot K, and Pasha Road Closures Site The changes in proposed land availability for Pasha within the Balanced Plan area and the Pasha Road Closures site are summarized in Table 8. Table 8. Summary of Land Availability for Pasha within Balanced Plan and Pasha Road Closures Components Areas Location Existing Proposed Difference Balanced Plan Area Lot K 11.37 6.49 -4.88 Lot J 3.35 0.00 -3.35 Pasha Road Closures Area 0.00 6.07 +6.07 Total 14.72 12.56 -2.16 The existing vehicle throughput on Lot J, Lot K, and the Pasha Road Closures site, and the potential maximum theoretical throughput on the proposed Lot J, Lot K, and the Pasha Road Closures site, and the difference between each is provided in Table 9. Table 9. Comparison of Existing Vehicle Throughput and Maximum Theoretical Vehicle Throughput for the Proposed Project Site Existing Acreage Existing Throughput, Existing Baseline (2,235 vehicles/ acre/year) Proposed Acreage Maximum Theoretical Throughput (5,157 vehicles/ acre/year) Net Change Lot J 3.35 7,487 0 0 -7,487 Lot K 11.37 25,412 6.49 33,469 +8,057 Pasha Road Closures 6.07 0 6.07 31,303 +31,303 TOTAL 14.72 32,899 12.56 64,772 +31,873 The NCMT Tank Farm EIR analyzed, among other things, a potential increase in throughput on the existing Lot J and Lot K, and therefore, a part of the potential increase in vehicle throughput associated with the proposed project site has already been analyzed in the NCMT Tank Farm EIR.' To determine the difference for what was analyzed as the potential throughput increase on (the existing) Lot J and Lot K in the NCMT Tank Farm EIR, and the potential throughput increase associated with the proposed project (see Table 9), the per acre calculations based on the "existing throughout" from the NCMT Tank Farm EIR needs to be calculated for the existing acreage of Lot J and Lot K; this calculation is shown in Table 10. -17- 366 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR Notice of Preparation December 2018 Table 10. Comparison of Existing and Proposed Vehicle Throughput for Existing Lot J and Lot K, per NCMT Tank Farm EIR Site Existing Acreage Existing Throughput used in NCMT Tank Farm EIR Existing Condition (2,287 vehicles/acre/year) Maximum Theoretical Throughput (5,157 vehicles/acre/ year) Net Change Lot J 3.35 7,661 17,276 +9,615 Lot K 11.37 26,003 58,635 +32,632 Total 14.72 33,664 75,911 +42,247 As shown in Table 9, the proposed project has the potential to increase vehicle throughput by approximately 31,873 vehicles per year over existing conditions. Comparing the proposed project's potential increase in annual vehicle throughput of 31,873 vehicles to the annual vehicle throughput that was analyzed in the NCMT Tank Farm EIR for Lot J and Lot K (42,247 vehicles, per Table 10), the proposed project would decrease the throughput potential by 10,374 vehicles per year.13 This is a comparison of what was analyzed in the NCMT Tank Farm EIR for the existing Lot J (3.35 acres) and the existing Lot K (11.37 acres), and the difference between the maximum theoretical throughput/capacity and the existing throughput (i.e., "Maximum Theoretical Throughput" minus "Existing Throughput, Existing Baseline") for the proposed project site, which includes Pasha operations on a modified Lot K (6.49 acres) and the Pasha Road Closures (6.07 acres). Bayshore Bikeway Component An alignment of the Bayshore Bikeway Component would extend generally from Civic Center Drive on the north to West 32nd Street on the south, via McKinley Avenue and Marina Way. The Bayshore Bikeway Component is proposed to be a Class I bike path that traverses the City's LCP and some areas of the District's PMP. This alignment would be located away from active marine terminal and maritime -related industrial areas. Figure 17 shows each of the three optional alignments that will be analyzed under CEQA, though only one alignment would be selected for implementation. As of the writing of this NOP, the preferred route is Route 3. The route details for each of the three possible alignments are provided below. Route 1 Route 1 would travel along the former railroad ROW to the southern end of the Best Western Marina Gateway hotel where it would turn west to travel along the western side of Marina Way. This route would then turn east on West 23rd Street and north onto McKinley Avenue. Route 2 Route 2 would travel along the existing alignment for Marina Way from West 32nd Street to the southern end of the Best Western Marina Gateway hotel where it would turn east into the hotel parking lot, turn north between the two buildings on the hotel property, cross Bay Marina Drive, and travel north along Cleveland Avenue to West 19th Street. The route would turn west at West 19th Street, then north on Tidelands Avenue. 13 42,247 vehicles per year — 31,873 vehicles per year = 10,374 vehicles per year -18- 367 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation Route 3 Route 3 would travel between the former railroad ROW and existing Marina Way on the southern end, and along McKinley Avenue on the northern end. This route would travel on Bay Marina Drive, between Marina Way and McKinley Avenue, then turn north on McKinley Avenue. The southern portion of this route is consistent with the Bayshore Bikeway location identified in the PMP and the City's Harbor District Specific Area Plan. City Program — Development Component The City Program proposes amendments to the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Harbor District Specific Area Plan, and the Land Use (Zoning) Code for seven parcels north of Bay Marina Drive, all of which are discussed below under City Program — Plan Amendments Component. Six of the parcels (approximately 2.9 acres) are owned by the City and comprise two complete blocks between Bay Marina Drive to the south, West 23rd Street to the north, Harrison Avenue to the west, and Interstate 5 to the east. The remaining parcel (approximately 1.2 acres), owned by the City and leased to the San Diego Railway Association, is located at the northwest corner of Bay Marina Drive and Marina Way (formerly Harrison Avenue); the historic Santa Fe Rail Depot is located on this parcel, and no new development is proposed on this parcel. The two City -owned, non -leased blocks are currently vacant. The City proposes to re -zone the parcels to Tourist Commercial (CT), which could allow these parcels to be developed with hotel, restaurant, retail, and/or some combination of tourist/visitor-serving commercial uses. The CT zone allows a floor area ratio (FAR) of up to 1.0, with no height limit; however, as part of the City Program — Plan Amendments Component, the City proposes to increase the FAR to 2.0 in the CT zone. The maximum allowable development with a FAR of 2.0 would be approximately 254,782 square feet of floor area. The proposed 2.0 FAR would allow for the development of desired land uses that require substantial floor areas such as hotels. The parking requirement would be based on the specific uses permitted in the CT zone. For purposes of the analysis, an example of a potential development scenario associated with the City Program would be a hotel with up to five stories and 150 rooms, along with 15,500 square feet of restaurant space and 12,000 square feet of retail space. The City Program would also include the potential closure, or narrowing, of Bay Marina Drive (west of Marina Way) to through vehicular traffic. All three scenarios are analyzed in this EIR, including keeping the road in its present condition with four lanes (two each way), reducing the four lanes to two lanes (one each way), and closing the road completely. An alignment of the Bayshore Bikeway, consistent with Routes 1, 2, and 3, as described above, would traverse the City Program site, which would be located in the City and outside District jurisdiction. It would not be subject to the Public Trust. It would also be located within the California Coastal Zone and the City's LCP area. The City Program would require amendments to the City's General Plan, Land Use Code, Local Coastal Program, and Harbor District Specific Area Plan. Port Master Plan Amendment Component The project components that are under the District's existing planning jurisdiction are within the National City Bayfront, Planning District 5, of the PMP. This planning district is an established developed area with designated Marine -Related Industrial, Marine Terminal, Commercial Recreation, Marina, Park/Plaza, and Street land and water uses. "Marina District" is the term for the area located generally north and west of Pier 32 Marina. There are multiple actions related to the PMPA. The proposed PMPA, which would incorporate the Balanced Plan Component, -19- 368 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation Pasha Road Closures Component, GB Capital Component, Pasha Rail Improvement Component, and a portion of the Bayshore Bikeway Component, would change the associated PMP maps, text, and tables to include the above land/water use changes associated with the project components. It would include the following more specific features: • Change Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street, as well as West 28th Street between Quay Avenue and Tidelands Avenue, would be changed from Street to Marine -Related Industrial. • Change the PMP maps and tables to reflect the revised land and water use designations associated with the Balanced Plan. • Revise the Circulation/Navigation Element of the PMP to identify proposed Segment 5 of the Bayshore Bikeway within District jurisdiction. • Modify and add public access corridor locations and widths for north —south and east — west public access corridors. The GB Capital Project would result in a land use configuration that would vary slightly from that identified in the Balanced Plan; therefore, the PMPA would reflect the land uses associated with the Balanced Plan and be revised, where appropriate, to reflect the GB Capital Component. City Program — Plan Amendments Component Implementation of the City Program and most of the Bayshore Bikeway Component would require amendments to the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Harbor District Specific Area Plan, Land Use Code, and Bicycle Master Plan (collectively, "City Planning Documents"). In addition, with the exception of the property owned by Caltrans, the area of the GB Capital Component that is east of the mean high tide line and not currently within the PMP would be amended in the City Planning Documents to reflect that this area would be added to the PMP through the project's PMPA. In 2011, the City adopted a General Plan Update and a Land Use (zoning) Code Update, which created new land use designations and zoning classifications for the City's entire planning area. However, the new land use designations and zoning classifications do not apply to areas within the City's LCP, pending a LCPA to incorporate these changes. Consequently, land uses within the City's LCP (generally, areas west of Interstate 5) are regulated under the City's 1996 General Plan (as amended) and the previous Land Use Code that preceded the 2011 update. Prior to the 2011 updates, land uses, and zoning were identified in the 1996 Combined General Plan/Zoning Map, as amended. The City Program would amend the City's General Plan Land Use Map and the Land Use Code Official Zoning Map to change the 1996 Combined General Plan/Zoning Map designations for five parcels that are designated Medium Manufacturing (MM) and two parcels that are designated Tourist Commercial (CT) to Specific Plan in the General Plan Land Use Map and Harbor District Specific Area Plan in the Land Use Code Official Zoning Map. The Harbor District Specific Area Plan would be amended to incorporate the seven parcels and to rezone five of the parcels from MM to CT. In addition, the FAR for the CT zone is proposed to be increased from 1.0 to 2.0. The proposed 2.0 FAR would allow for the development of desired land uses that require substantial floor areas such as hotels. The City's Bicycle Master Plan would also be amended to reflect the realignment of the Bayshore Bikeway. The LCP would be amended to reflect these changes to land use, zoning, and Specific Plan designations. The City Planning Documents would also be amended to reflect the GB Capital Component of the project. For the portions of the GB Capital Component that are within District jurisdiction, the General Plan Land Use Map and the Land Use Code Official Zoning Map would be amended to -20- 369 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation change the 1996 Combined General Plan/Zoning Map designation of CT to San Diego Unified Port District in the General Plan Land Use Map and Port Master Plan in the Land Use Code Official Zoning Map. The Harbor District Specific Area Plan would be amended to remove the District's jurisdictional areas of the GB Capital Component from the Specific Plan. The LCP would be amended to reflect these changes. In addition, all of the road closures would need to be removed from the Circulation Element Roadway Classifications of the City's General Plan. The GB Capital Component extends onto a portion of the SDG&E utility corridor, east of the existing marina. This area is designated for CT uses in the City Planning Documents. The GB Capital Component improvements would be consistent with that use. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS The attached Initial Study/Environmental Checklist for the National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments addresses the potential environmental effects related to the proposed project and provides a discussion of which potential project -related and cumulative environmental effects would be included in the EIR. The EIR will include the following potential environmental effects of the proposed project: aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, noise, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation and traffic, utilities/service systems, and other potential impacts identified during the NOP process. The EIR will also address feasible mitigation measures and a reasonable range of alternatives, as well as the additional mandatory sections required by CEQA. The District will also prepare a mitigation monitoring and reporting program to address the potential significant impacts of the proposed project. COMMENTS The NOP is available for a public review period that starts on Thursday, December 20, 2018, and ends at 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 31, 2019. Written comments will be accepted until 5:00 p.m. on Thursday, January 31, 2019. Comments regarding the scope and content of the environmental information that should be included in the EIR and other environmental concerns should be sent to: San Diego Unified Port District Attn: Anna Buzaitis Planning Department 3165 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA 92101 or emailed to abuzaitiportofsandiego.orq PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING A public scoping meeting to solicit comments on the scope and content of the EIR will be held on Thursday, January 24, 2019, at 6:00 p.m. at the National City Aquatic Center, 3300 Goesno Place, National City, CA 91950. District staff will be available to answer project questions at the scoping meeting. Comments at the scoping meeting will only be accepted in written form. The District, as Lead Agency pursuant to CEQA, will review the written public comments received on the NOP and at the scoping meeting to assist in determining which issues should be addressed in the EIR. -21 - 370 of 473 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 EIR Notice of Preparation Other opportunities for the public to comment on the environmental effects of the proposed project include, but are not limited to, the following: • A minimum 45-day public review period for the Draft EIR • A public hearing before the Board of Port Commissioners to consider certification of the EIR For questions regarding this NOP, please contact Anna Buzaitis, Program Manager, Planning Department, at (619) 686-7263. ATTACHMENTS Figure 1: Project Vicinity Map Figure 2: Project Components Figure 3: Proposed Balanced Land Use Plan Figure 4: Existing and Proposed Roadways within Balanced Plan Area Figure 5: Park and Public Access Corridors Figure 6: Proposed Relocation of Buoys Figure 7: Phase I of GB Capital Component Figure 8: Phase II of GB Capital Component Figure 9: Illustrative of Proposed Hotel on Parcel B1 Figure 10: View of Realigned Marina Way with Dry Storage Figure 11: Phase II Hotel Tower East-West Elevations Figure 12: Phase II Hotel Tower North -South Elevations Figure 13: Proposed Habitat Buffers Figure 14: Proposed Rail Tracks Figure 15: National City Marine Terminal Rail Route Figure 16: Location of Lot J and Lot K Figure 17: Interim and Potential Permanent Alignments of SANDAG Bayshore Bikeway in National City Initial Study/Environmental Checklist for the National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR -22- 371 of 473 shy .*•s-Frt.ai+s,` 41 ' 1d44ilu,i PanILu..0 144' Lter 'mach). Legend Site Boundary 0 0.75 1.5 Miles N 1:100,000 Source: ICF; SDUPD; ESRI 2017 ri rl ��ISIOi7� 5.e^ City Da+ ,mil Project o It e4 .21 Location, .ir Figure 1 Project Vicinity Map National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendment 372 of 473 373 of 473 Existing Buoys Proposed Buoys Mean High Tide Line GB Capital Component (landside-21.2 acres, waterside-25.7 acres) Marine -Related Industrial (6.8 acres) Pepper Park (5.9 acres) Tidelands Ave South of 32nd St (0.6 acres) Pasha Rail Improvement Component (3033.3 ft) Pasha Road Closures Component (1942.1 ft) Route 1 (8152.3 ft) Route 2 (7887.4 ft) Route 3 (7929.0 ft) City Program - Development Component (6.2 acres) Source: ICF, SDUPD, SanGIS (2017); Imagery-BING (2018) •I/ /ICF Figure 2 Project Components National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendment 374 of 473 375 of 473 a tt 0 PDCCITRDSGIS y.- 1¶Urr 1 PB T52ac P? \ 2_37 ac CONNECTOR AND STORAGE TRACKS /f IOtr` ARLA H4 4 tax •�' .i- Q-- r PI 3.67s_ LT- AO jAT C GENT AQUATIC CENTER 1111111.11=11111f 3 I — I1491r4T @4+-ruMrs -s 61a .1 •IU a • siof !YEW BAY NATior . it:mirevIESUGE. f'ARADIK MARSH LLIGL C .Lout ?Lff WSTiN* krii HM4103-41uff44 I1exuGEle; 1-4..17UC4 l l4'1M4 rDP UCtI rraliflArit IMasifi 061,16014T616rI ';1 6 U13Sa410.L x i ff It r r4417 lb •I� SITE SUUNUARY MEAN HIGH TIDE UNE fcrUGE BOUNDARY L.ANCUARNS HABTTAT BUFFER CURRENT RAILWAY UNE PRDROSEC RAILWAY LINE SMACK UNC --- i+AF{li' PI Alr1 AOCESS MARINE RATED-INCU$7R►r _ E cOMMERC%kAL IfiEC 1EAiirm VISUAL, PEEESTRIAN+BIKE, tL EMERGENCY ACCESS STREET 111111 MATURE TOIMINAL 1i5ik3ik Figure 3 Proposed Balanced Land Use Plan National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendment '1' 376 of 473 377 of 473 a PDCC TROSG S Proposed 03 1 I M Rood 4. Road rReafgre t Aelnrnn Way) Existings, W. 32nd Street Existing - _' II-."lithet ti t oS <PodRoodD2 II Exbll Rood a1'r'"o ROOd New PIvcN rniin Of 7;cielondt. Avfmue 1111 :: Proposed. New A!NI■ Existing Roadways ■N•■ Proposed Roadways `I/_ /ICF Figure 4 Existing and Proposed Roadways Within Balanced Plan Area National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR 378 of 473 379 of 473 11PGCCITROSGIS2'Proiects 4'P East-West Public Access Corridor 1 ac New pork North -South Public Access Corridor New Park ■ •1■ Public Access Corridor Figure 5 Park and Public Access Corridors National City Bayfront Projects and Plan AmendmeT 380 of 473 381 of 473 ' NtIMMUM ExstIng Buoys; Proposed to be Removed Figure 6 Proposed Relocation of Buoys National City Bayfront Projects and Plan AmendmeT 382 of 473 383 of 473 LAUNDRY/RESTROOM W/STAFF UNIT ABOVE DRY BOAT STORAGE EXISTING PIER 32 MARINA BUILDINGS NEW PIER 32 MARINA VILLAG E AD M IN ISTRATIO N BUILDING NEW PARKING AREA K:1Projects_41Port_of_San_Diego100152_17_NalCity_Bayfront_EIR\Figures\Doc\EIR\PD GATED EXIT/ENTRANCE. OPEN PEDESTRIAN AND BIKE ACCESS PHASE 1 LIMIT OF WORK VIEW POINTS CENTRAL PROMENADE FUTURE BAYSHORE BIKE WAY TEMP BIKE PATH DURING PHASE 1 PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY EXPANDED RESTROOMS VIEW POINTS EXISTING LEASE HO BOUNDARY PHASE 1 BOUNDARY MODULAR CABINS PARKING DECK EXPANSION MODULAR CABINS AOUACULTURE OPPORTUNITY BUOYS IN CHANNEL, 60' TO 100' DIA. Figure 7 Phase I of GB Capital Component National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments 384 of 473 385 of 473 \PDCCITRDSGI S2\Projects_4\Port_of_San_Diego\00152_ 17_Na tCity_Ba yfront_EIR\Figures\Doc\EIR\I S_NOP REMOVE UP TO 65 RV SPOTS, REPLACE WITH SURFACE PARKING 11-STORY 282-ROOM HOTEL YARD/POOL l- CENTRAL PROMENADE PHASE 2 BOUN 4 STORY/60-ROO HOTEL W/RETAIL PERMANENT BIKE PATH 3 STORY/40-ROOM HOTE EXISTING LEASE HOL BOUNDARY ,ICF Figure 8 Phase II of GB Capital Component National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments EIR 386 of 473 387 of 473 389 of 473 K:\Projects 41Port_of_San_Diego\00152_17_NatCity Bayfront EIR\Figures\Doc\EIR\PD /ICF Figure 10 View of ' - . ' • • - • . rina Way with Dry Storage National City Bayfr• 390 of 473 and Plan Amendments EIR 391 of 473 K:1Projects_41Port_o(_Sa n_Diego100152_17_NalCily_Bay(ronl_EI R\F ig ures\Doe\EI RIPD LVL 12 LVL 11 RIM LVL 10 LVL LVL B LVL] LVL 6 EAST ELEVATION LVL 11 LVL 10 LVL9 LVLA LPL LVL6 LVL5 LVL4 P5 P2 WEST ELEVATION Ph National City Bayfr 392 of 473 Figure 11 Tower East-West Elevations and Plan Amendments EIR 393 of 473 K1Projects 4\Port_of_San_Diego500152_17_NatCity_Bayfront_EIR\Figures\Doc\EIRYPD +125 .32 20 BOUTIQUE HOTEL 4129 LVL tl LVL 10 LVL LVL LVL LVL 6 LVL 5 LVL 4 c5 v1 NORTH ELEVATION 112 ♦32 LVL 12 LVL 11 LVL 10 LVL9 LYL8 LVL ] LVL6 110' COURTYARD LVL4 BOUTIQUE HOTEL SOUTH ELEVATION Phas National City Bayfr 394 of 473 Figure 12 wer North -South Elevations and Plan Amendments EIR 395 of 473 0 cc 11PGCCITROSGIS2'Proiects 4'P Building Setback (200 ft) Port Property Figure 13 Proposed Habitat Buffers National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendment."' 396 of 473 397 of 473 Proposed Storage Rail Track W 32ND ST National City Distribution Center Prnpnsed Connector Rail Track Figure 14 Proposed Rail Tracks National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendment: 398 of 473 399 of 473 of San Dieoo100152 17 PDCCITRDSGIS National City Rail Yard On- T.Arr rn R.;itl G ndrk r Figure 15 National City Marine Terminal Rail Route National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendment 400 of 473 401 of 473 0 11PDCCITROSGIS2'+ProieGs •I / /ICF Figure 16 Location of Lot J and Lot K National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendment 402 of 473 403 of 473 0 s,Doc,EI RrIS NOPFiu a "OM Existing Class I Interim Class I hike patty CldS5 II Dike (dues ■ ■ I Class III hike route Potential Permanent. ■ Route 1 in • ■ Route 2 i Route 3 t rr r TO-rlo r, ti Yk a; ITN s7 1 1 NBAY telARINA CPR 1 to *1. CIVIC CENTER � r r • r 12 r S I 1F .1 rr J 9 Y f O 7 W • f• w n IP D J X I'l TPJ1,1 :jr q 111 4 Ih 1Y yl Gr;. J ,�1,y. U 1LI 1111 if 0 of s 1• mu Ri 2r. Itra FFLY A+' 4. !Ft • LL ♦ 8 I i $ 4 m 111"1.41!!11■■■■■■■laB..MrL 1 Tr! J1 1 1 W2 HST 1 1 1 Ci •I / /ICF Figure 17 Interim and Potential Permanent Alignments of SANDAG BayShore Bikeway in Nation ' Projects and Plan Amendmen 404 0 National City Bayfront f 473 405 of 473 NATIONAL CITY BAYFRONT PROJECTS AND PLAN AMENDMENTS INITIAL STUDY/ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Prepared by: ICF December 2018 406 of 473 407 of 473 Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations Page Initial Study/Environmental Checklist 1 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected 3 Determination 3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 4 I. Aesthetics 6 II. Agriculture and Forest Resources 10 III. Air Quality 12 IV. Biological Resources 16 V. Cultural Resources 21 VI. Geology and Soils 24 VII. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 28 VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 30 IX. Hydrology and Water Quality 34 X. Land Use and Planning 39 XI. Mineral Resources 40 XII. Noise 41 XIII. Population and Housing 44 XIV. Public Services 46 XV. Recreation 48 XVI. Transportation/Traffic 49 XVII. Tribal Cultural Resources 52 XVII. Utilities and Service Systems 54 XVIII. Mandatory Findings of Significance 57 References 59 National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments Initial Study December 2018 ICF 00152.17 408 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations AB Assembly Bill ARB California Air Resources Board BMPs Best Management Practices BNSF Burlington Northern Santa Fe CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations City Planning Documents City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and Harbor District Specific Area Plan CO carbon monoxide CRHR California Register of Historical Resources DOC Department of Conservation DOT Department of Transportation DPM diesel particulate matter EIR Environmental Impact Report FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GHG greenhouse gas INRMP Integrated Natural Resource Management Plan JRMP District's Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program MRZ Mineral Resource Zone NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAS Naval Air Station NCMT National City Marine Terminal NOLF Naval Outlying Landing Field NRHP National Register of Historical Places PM10 particulate matter of 10 microns in diameter or smaller PM2.5 particulate matter of 2.5 microns in diameter or smaller PMP Port Master Plan PMP Port Master Plan RAQS Regional Air Quality Strategy RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Regional Plan San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan SANDAG San Diego Association of Governments SCIC South Coastal Information Center SDAB San Diego Air Basin SDAPCD San Diego Air Pollution Control District SIP State Implementation Plan SR- State Route SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan SWRCB State Water Resources Control Board TAC toxic air contaminant National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study li ICF 00152.17 409 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Contents TIA Transportation Impact Analysis USDA United States Department of Agriculture USGS United Sates Geological Survey VOC volatile organic compound National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study iii ICF 00152.17 410 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Contents This page intentionally left blank. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study iv ICF 00152.17 411 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Initial Study/Environmental Checklist 1. Project Title: National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: San Diego Unified Port District (District) 3165 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92101 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Anna Buzaitis, Planning Department (619) 686-7263 4. Project Location: National City, generally north of Sweetwater Channel, south of Civic Center Drive, east of the National City Marine Terminal, and west of Paradise Marsh (National Wildlife Refuge) and Interstate 5 See Figure 1. 5. Project Applicant/Proponent Name and San Diego Unified Port District Address: 3165 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92101 6. Land Use Designation(s): 7. Zoning: 8. Description of Project: City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-430 Pasha Automotive Services 1309 Bay Marina Drive National City, CA 91950 GB Capital Holdings, LLC 3201 Marina Way National City, CA 91950 Various in Port Master Plan: Marine Terminal, Marine - Related Industrial, Park/Plaza, Commercial Recreation, Street, Recreational Boat Berthing; Various in City Planning Documents: Tourist Commercial, Medium Manufacturing, Open Space, and Open Space Reserve See Port Master Plan Designation for Port Property; City: Open Space, Open Space Reserve, Tourist Commercial, Medium Manufacturing See Project Description in Notice of Preparation National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 1 ICF 00152.17 412 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required: Marina District and Balanced Land Use Plan: North: Industrial uses East: San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit (Paradise Marsh) South: San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge and Sweetwater Channel West: National City Marine Terminal and San Diego Bay Tidelands Avenue Closure Project: North: Bay Marina Drive East: Industrial uses South: W 32nd Street West: Industrial uses GB Capital Project: North: Industrial uses East: San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit (Paradise Marsh) South: Sweetwater Channel West: Industrial and recreational uses City Program: North: Industrial East: Interstate 5 South: Bay Marina Drive West: National City Depot Bayshore Bikeway Component: North: Industrial and commercial uses East: Interstate 5 and San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit (Paradise Marsh) South: Commercial and recreational uses and San Diego Bay West: Industrial and recreational uses California Coastal Commission approval of PMPA and City Harbor District Specific Area Plan; City of National City approval of City General Plan Amendments, Land Use Code, Local Coastal Program, and Harbor District Specific Area Plan; California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) approval of utilization of Caltrans property east of the marina, and approval of construction and utilization of Bayshore Bikeway on Caltrans property near Civic Center Drive/Harbor Drive intersection; Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) approval of construction and utilization of (inactive rail) MTS right- of-way south of Bay Marina Drive for Bayshore Bikeway; and potential approval from SANDAG for the Bayshore Bikeway Component. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 2 ICF 00152.17 413 of 473 San Mega Unified Port Diana Jnitia1 Study/Enwi rpnmenta1 Checklist Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would potentially be affected by this project (Le., the project would involve at least one impact tEiat is a " Pete ntialty Significant Impact"), as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. r4 Aesthetics Biological Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Land Use/Planning Pop ulation /lion si ra g Tran sporta tion/Traffc El Mandatory Findings of Significance Determination Agriculture arid Forest Resources Cultural Resources Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mineral Resources Public Services Tribal Cultural Resources Air Quality Geology/Soils Hyd rology/Vater Quality Noise Recreation Utilities/Service Systems On the basis of this initial evaluation: O I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not ben significant effect in this case because revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. 21 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have an impact on the environment that is 'potentially significantt' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" but at least one effect () has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards and (2) has been addressed by rn[tigatinn measures based on the earlier analysis, as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, bat it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed, ❑ 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable Standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the project, nothing Further is required. Signature Anna 1 uzaitis, Program Manager 11/ O/1O18 Date San Diego Unified Port District Printed Fame For NatFenal Gky Bayfront Projects and Plan Ameildments December 2018 Initial Study 3 JCF ce152 414 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Evaluation of Environmental Impacts 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained if it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -Level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated" applies when the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from a "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less -than -Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less -than -significant level. 5. Earlier analyses may be used if, pursuant to tiering, program EIR, or other California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section 15063(c) (3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where earlier analyses are available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, when appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source List should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 4 ICF 00152.17 415 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to a less -than -significant level. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 5 ICF 00152.17 416 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist L Aesthetics Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact impact Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings along a scenic highway? c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? a. Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Potentially Significant Impact. The Port Master Plan (PMP) provides a framework for the consideration of vista areas that have been recognized as scenic and visually important to the area and the region. The project is in Planning District 5 (National City Bayfront) of the PMP. There is only one scenic vista area identified in Planning District 5, in the western portion of Pepper Park, facing southwest across the Sweetwater Channel and toward the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge. In addition, although not identified in the Port Master Plan, an existing 20-foot-wide view corridor/clear zone is required to be maintained, pursuant to the Pier 32 Marina Coastal Development Permit (District CDP-2006-02), at the existing terminus of Marina Way, looking south through the site towards the Pier 32 Overlook and marina. The north -south public access corridors identified in the Balanced Plan Component and GB Capital Component are proposed to be located along the existing alignment of Marina Way and centered on the existing view corridor at Pier 32 Marina. In addition, the existing alignment of Marina Way is identified as the Harrison Avenue Public Access Corridor in the City's Harbor District Specific Area Plan, and per that plan is a "designated public visual protection area"; therefore, this will be further analyzed in the EIR. Closure of Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street, and West 28th Street between Tidelands Avenue and Quay Avenue, as well as closure of the southern half of the existing Goesno Place south of West 32nd Street would have no effect on views of the Bay from these locations because views are obstructed by maritime operations, including the cargo storage and related structures, fencing, and landscaping, the latter of which is particularly notable when looking south toward Pepper Park from Tidelands Avenue. As such, closing portions of Tidelands Avenue, West 28th Street, and Goesno Place would not have a substantial impact on a scenic vista. The proposed project would expand Pepper Park by approximately 2.54 acres. The existing scenic vista area is anticipated to be enhanced because a larger park area would be created that would have the same views of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge and Sweetwater Channel. Because this scenic vista is not oriented toward the project sites, the changes associated with the proposed project would not alter the views from this vista area. Therefore, the proposed project would have no impact on the existing designated scenic vista in Planning District 5. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 6 ICF 00152.17 417 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Other project components would also not have a significant impact on other general (i.e., non - designated) public views. Specifically, the Pasha Road Closures Component of the project, which would close Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street, and West 28th Street between Tidelands Avenue and Quay Avenue, would have no effect on views of the Bay from these locations because views are obstructed by maritime operations, including cargo storage and related structures, fencing, and landscaping. As such, the Pasha Road Closures Component of the project would not result in a substantial impact on a scenic vista. Aside from the single designated scenic vista in Planning District 5, the next closest designated scenic vista to the project sites is within Planning District 7 (Chula Vista Bayfront), approximately 1.3 miles south of the project sites, looking north towards the project area. Planning District 8 (Silver Strand South) contains a scenic vista approximately 2 miles southwest of the project sites, looking east, with a panoramic view of the Bay, including Chula Vista Bayfront, National City Bayfront, and downtown San Diego. This vista would provide a view of the project sites to the northeast. However, in each case the long-distance views to the proposed project sites would not be significantly affected because, at this distance, the project sites make up only a small part of the overall viewshed and would not cause these views to be blocked or otherwise impair important scenic attractions such as the Bay and adjacent waterfront areas. Therefore, impacts on scenic vistas in nearby Planning Districts 7 and 8 would be less than significant. Designated scenic vistas on the Coronado Bayfront (Planning District 6) are located approximately 4 miles from the project area and face southeast, toward the project area. It is possible that development associated with the proposed project would be visible from designated scenic vista areas in Planning District 6; however, because the viewshed consists of the Bay as well as a cityscape with many skyscrapers, hotels, and industrial structures, and because the proposed project sites are distant views, implementation of the proposed project would not block these designated views or otherwise alter the existing views such that the views would be degraded. As such, the proposed project's impact on designated scenic vistas in Planning District 6 would be less than significant. Finally, construction of the proposed project would result in temporary visible construction -related activity within and adjacent to Pepper Park associated with the use of standard construction equipment such as earth -moving equipment, concrete trucks, and forklifts. The direct open -water views of the Sweetwater Channel and the Bay from Pepper Park would be unaffected, regardless of construction activities because construction activities would primarily occur behind (away from) the location of the designated scenic vista. Consequently, construction of the proposed project would not result in a significant impact on a designated scenic vista. b. Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings along a scenic highway? Less -than -Significant Impact. The project sites are located in an area that is urban and developed with recreational, commercial, and industrial land uses. There are no scenic rock outcroppings on the project sites. There are trees in Pepper Park and on the perimeter of the City Component portion of the site, but none are designated as scenic resources. Moreover, the proposed project would expand Pepper Park and add trees within the expansion area and within other project areas. Although no historic buildings are presently within the project sites, the proposed project would potentially relocate the City -owned Granger Hall, a designated historical building, to Pepper Park as part of the Balanced Plan Component. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 7 ICF 00152.17 418 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Views of the project sites would not be available from any of the six designated scenic highways in San Diego County (DOT 2018). The nearest designated scenic highway to the project sites is State Route (SR-) 75, which travels in a north/south direction from Coronado to Imperial Beach. SR-75 is more than 3 miles west of the project sites, across San Diego Bay. At this distance, some brief views of the National City Bayfront maybe available on a clear day; however, no clear views of the project sites are available from SR-75. The existing Granger Hall site is approximately 2 miles east of the National City Bayfront and is not visible from SR-75. Other designated scenic highways, such as portions of SR-52, SR-78, SR-94, SR-125, and SR-163, are several miles from the project sites and do not have views of the sites. Impacts to scenic resources along a scenic highway would not occur. Therefore, the proposed project would have a less -than -significant impact on scenic resources. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. c. Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Potentially Significant Impact. The existing conditions on the project sites include Pepper Park and the National City Aquatic Center, paved parking lots for Pasha related activities, the Pier 32 Marina structures, and disturbed vacant lots. Parcels adjacent to the project sites are developed with a Best Western Hotel, large warehouses including National City Distribution Center (adjacent to Marina Way), the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) National City Rail Yard (southwest of Bay Marina Drive/Marina Way), and an Amazon distribution center (adjacent to Bay Marina Drive). Implementation of components such as the Pasha Road Closures and Pasha Rail Improvement would be similar to the industrial character that currently exists, including the cargo storage areas and existing rail lines. The Bayshore Bikeway would maintain the visual character of the area and would blend in with existing conditions because it would mostly require changes in road striping and configuration, with small-scale signage. The Balanced Plan and City Program would reconfigure and redesignate properties in the Marina District and on seven City -owned parcels to allow commercial recreational development, which would change the visual character of the current cargo storage areas and vacant lots to multi -story commercial -recreation buildings (e.g., hotels, retail, and restaurant). The GB Capital Component of the proposed project would introduce new visual elements, such as an RV park, modular cabins, concealed dry boat storage, and up to four hotels, one of which would be up to 11 stories tall. Given that some project components (e.g., the GB Capital Component) would introduce several new visual elements to the National City Marina District, the extent to which the project would degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project site and its surroundings will be evaluated in the EIR. Therefore, this issue area will be discussed further in the EIR. d. Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? Potentially Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would potentially create new sources of light and glare, from street, building, or safety lighting. New sources of glare could result if the proposed structures are constructed with highly reflective building material. Additionally, excessive light and impacts to adjacent land uses could result if new lighting is not down shielded. The surrounding land uses contain several sources of light and glare, such as street lighting along the existing roadways in, and adjacent to, the project sites, and building lights associated with the Best Western hotel and adjacent warehouses. In addition, the existing Pasha facility is used as vehicle storage, so parked vehicles are a source of daytime glare in the area (the vehicles' sheet metal and glass reflect the sunlight). Although the proposed project is not anticipated to represent a new source of light and glare that would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 8 ICF 00152.17 419 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist in the area, especially when considered in context with the surrounding conditions, this issue area will be further discussed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 9 ICF 00152.17 420 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist II. Agriculture and Forest Resources Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact In determining whether impacts on agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project, the Forest Legacy Assessment project, and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract? c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest use? EI EI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ U ❑ ❑ ❑ a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The project sites are not used as active agricultural land, nor are they planned or zoned for agricultural uses. According to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Department of Conservation, the project sites and surrounding area are classified as Urban and National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 10 ICF 00152.17 421 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Built -Up Land (DOC 2018), which does not contain any agricultural uses or areas designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, project approval would not result in the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use. No impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. b. Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. As described above in II.a, the proposed project sites and surrounding area are not zoned for agricultural uses. According to the California Department of Conservation's (DOC's) San Diego County Williamson Act Lands Map, the project sites and surrounding area are designated as "Urban and Built -Up Land," and no Williamson Act lands occur on the site or surrounding area (DOC 2013). Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or conflict with a Williamson Act contract. No impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. c. Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 1222O(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 511O4(g))? No Impact. As described above under II.a and II.b, the project sites are within District tidelands and are not used or zoned for agricultural use. The project sites do not contain forest lands, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g), or timberland, as defined by Public Resources Code Section 4526, and are not zoned for forest land or timberland or Timberland Production, as defined by Government Code Section 51104(g). Project approval would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land or timberland resources; therefore, no impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. d. Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non forest use? No Impact. As discussed above under II.c, the project sites do not contain any forest lands as defined in Public Resources Code Section 12220(g); consequently, the project would not result in the loss or conversion of forest land to a non -forest use. In addition, the project is not located in the vicinity of forest resources. Therefore, no impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. e. Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non - forest use? No Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would have no impact on agriculture or forestry resources. The project sites are classified as Urban and Built -Up Land, which does not contain any agricultural uses or areas designated for Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Furthermore, there are no Williamson Act contracts or forest lands in the project vicinity (DOC 2013). The project would not result in conversion of important farmland or other agricultural resources to a non-agricultural use because the project sites and the surrounding area are developed land that is used for industrial purposes or is currently disturbed and vacant. Therefore, the proposed project would not involve changes to the existing environment that, because of its location or nature, would result in the conversion of Farmland to non- agricultural use or forest land to non -forest use. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 11 ICF 00152.17 422 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist ❑l. Air Quality Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact When available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is a nonattainment area for an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? izi a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Potentially Significant Impact. The San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) is required, pursuant to the federal and state Clean Air Acts, to reduce emissions of criteria pollutants for which the County is in nonattainment (i.e., ozone, particulate matter of 10 microns in diameter or smaller [PM10], and particulate matter of 2.5 microns in diameter or smaller [PM2.5]). The most recent SDAPCD air quality attainment plans are the 2016 Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS), 2002 and 2012 ozone maintenance plans, and the 2016 ozone attainment plan. The RAQS outlines SDAPCD's plans and control measures designed to attain the state air quality standards for ozone, while the 2002 and 2012 maintenance plans and 2016 attainment plan include the SDAPCD's plans and control measures for attaining the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone. The 2016 RAQS projects future emissions and determines the strategies necessary for the reduction of stationary -source emissions through regulatory controls. The federal Clean Air Act also mandates that the state submit and implement a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for local areas not meeting those standards. California Air Resources Board (ARB) mobile source emission projections and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) growth projections are based on population and vehicle trends and land use plans developed by local agencies. As such, projects that propose development that is consistent with the growth anticipated by the relevant land use plans that were used in the formulation of the RAQS and SIP would be consistent with the RAQS and SIP. The PMP is the governing land use document for physical development under the jurisdiction of the District; and the City's General Plan, Local Coastal Program, and Harbor District Specific Area Plan (collectively, City Planning Documents) are the governing land use documents for physical development within the City. Therefore, projects that propose development consistent with growth National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 12 ICF 00152.17 423 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist anticipated by the current PMP and the City Planning Documents are considered consistent with the RAQS and SIP. Moreover, for a project that proposes development that is less dense than anticipated within a general plan (or other governing land use document such as the PMP), that project would likewise be consistent with the RAQS and SIP because emissions would be less than estimated for the existing PMP. If a project proposes development that is greater than that anticipated in the PMP, City Planning Documents and SANDAG's growth projections, the project would not yet be reflected in the RAQS and SIP, and might have a potentially significant impact on air quality because emissions would exceed those estimated for the existing PMP and City Planning Documents. This situation would warrant further analysis to determine if a project would exceed the growth projections used in the RAQS for a specific subregional area. Further evaluation of the project's consistency with the RAQS and SIP will be analyzed in the EIR. b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Potentially Significant Impact. As mentioned above, the SDAPCD is required to reduce emissions of pollutants for which the County is in nonattainment (i.e., ozone, PM10, and PM2.5). Emissions related to the proposed project would be attributable to both the construction phase and its operational phase. Construction of the proposed project has the potential to create air quality impacts through the use of heavy-duty construction equipment, construction worker vehicle trips, truck haul and material delivery trips, off -gassing from paving activities, and fugitive dust from demolition and grading activities. Mobile -source criteria pollutant emissions would result from the use of construction equipment and vehicles, and paving operations would result in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) associated with off -gassing. Operation of the proposed project has the potential to introduce new uses and change terminal activity, which may create air quality impacts primarily associated with RV park and hotel uses, marina/park uses, vessel activity, car carrier truck trips, rail activity, worker commutes, car on- and off-loading, and minor increases in area sources associated with periodic painting of paved surfaces. As such, the project has the potential to significantly contribute to the violation of an air quality standard or significantly contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation, and this issue will be analyzed in the EIR. c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is a nonattainment area for an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Potentially Significant Impact The San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) is currently in nonattainment for ozone under the NAAQS and for PM10 and PM2.5 under California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS), which is a result of past and present projects and could be further impeded by the proposed project. Operation of the proposed project has the potential to introduce new uses (e.g., hotels, RV park) and change terminal activity, which may create air quality impacts. Due to a potential increase in operations associated with the project, the project has the potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for which the SDAB is in nonattainment. Therefore, this issue will be analyzed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 13 ICF 00152.17 424 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Potentially Significant Impact ARB defines sensitive receptors as locations where pollutant - sensitive members of the population may reside or where the presence of air pollutant emissions could adversely affect use of the land. Sensitive members of the population include those who may experience greater harm from poor air quality than other members of the population. ARB has identified the following people as the most likely to be affected by air pollution: children younger than 14, the elderly older than 65, athletes, and people with cardiovascular and chronic respiratory diseases. These groups are classified as "sensitive receptors" (ARB 2005). Locations that may contain a high concentration of these sensitive population groups include residential areas, hospitals, daycare facilities, elder -care facilities, schools, and parks. Diesel particulate matter (DPM), which is classified as a carcinogenic toxic air contaminant (TAC) by ARB, is the primary pollutant of concern with regard to health risks to sensitive receptors. Diesel - powered construction equipment and diesel -powered heavy-duty trucks emit DPM. Construction activities associated with each project component would include diesel equipment activity near existing and proposed new sensitive land uses. Generally, construction activities at a marine terminal are far enough away to not affect nearby uses. However, as activities will be near existing and proposed new uses potentially for an extended time, construction -related TAC emissions will be analyzed in the EIR. As noted in III.b above, operation of the various project components would change the emissions profile by introducing new emission sources and by changing terminal activity, which may create air quality impacts primarily associated with RV park and hotel uses, marina/park uses, vessel activity, car carrier truck trips, rail activity, worker commutes, car on- and off-loading, and other ancillary uses. Terminal activity is near Pepper Park, while truck and rail that carry cargo to and from the terminal travel through and near residential neighborhoods. Any changes in this activity (e.g., closure of Bay Marina Drive to through -traffic) could expose nearby sensitive receptors to pollutants. Moreover, changes that would affect the layout of the terminal, such as the connector track, and changes that would introduce new land uses and emission sources to the area, such as the GB Capital Component and City Program Component, could potentially conflict with nearby uses that could expose sensitive land uses to new sources of emissions. In addition, the various proposed project components would result in new vehicle traffic, and potentially new traffic patterns (e.g., closure of Bay Marina Drive to through -traffic) that would have the potential to create carbon monoxide (CO) hotspots at nearby roadways and intersections. In addition, the effect of CO levels that would be produced as a result of traffic generated from the proposed project on ambient CO levels will be discussed in the EIR using the traffic data provided by the Transportation Impact Analysis. The project would potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, including TACs and carbon monoxide. Construction and operation of the proposed project would result in criteria pollutant and TAC emissions in different quantities than existing conditions. Therefore, this issue will be analyzed in the EIR. e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Potentially Significant Impact According to ARB's Air Quality and Land Use Handbook, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include sewage treatment plants, landfills, recycling facilities, and manufacturing operations (CARB 2005). Odor impacts on residential areas and other National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 14 ICF 00152.17 425 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist sensitive receptors, such as hospitals, daycare centers, and schools, warrant the closest scrutiny, but consideration should also be given to other land uses where people may congregate, such as recreational facilities, work sites, and commercial areas. Potential odor emitters during construction activities include diesel exhaust, asphalt paving, and the use of any architectural coatings to paint paved surfaces. Potential odor emitters during operations would include diesel exhaust from truck and train activity as well as the use of any architectural coatings to periodically paint paved surfaces. However, the sources of odor impacts would be limited to the marina uses, circulation routes, parking areas, and areas immediately adjacent to terminal operations. This issue will be analyzed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 15 ICF 00152.17 426 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist IV. Biological Resources Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marshes, vernal pools, coastal wetlands, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? El 0 0 El El 0 0 El a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special -status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Potentially Significant Impact. The majority of the project sites are located within disturbed land that has previously been graded. Parcel B6, which is part of the Balanced Plan and the GB Capital Component, is located adjacent to the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge and therefore a wildlife survey was conducted to identify special -status species that are known. Two special - status plant species were detected within the survey area: estuary seablite (Suaeda esteroa) and beach goldenaster (Heterotheca sessiliflora ssp. Sessiliflora). Three special -status wildlife species National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 16 ICF 00152.17 427 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist were detected within the survey area: osprey (Pandion haliaetus), wandering skipper (Panoquina errans), and Belding's savannah sparrow (Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi). Construction, demolition, and operational activities associated with the proposed project could result in a significant impact on the special -status plant and wildlife species. Disturbed habitat covers much of the survey area as the area has been previously graded and is therefore heavily disturbed. The area is dominated by the invasive plant, stinknet (Oncosiphon piluliferum), with emergent broom baccharis (Baccharis sarothroides), which is native. However, these species occur in disturbed areas on the site and are not part of a native, functioning habitat; thus, the area is not considered to be sensitive habitat. Moreover, little -to -no vegetation is present on the City -owned parcels as they appear to have been graded. However, additional investigation into the existing conditions of Parcel B6, the seven City Parcels, and part of the proposed alignment of the Bayshore Bikeway and surrounding areas will be conducted, and the results of the analysis will be included in the EIR. In -water activities would occur as part of the GB Capital Component. These activities could result in noise or vibration impacts during the construction phase, and additional overwater shading may occur as well. A marine biological resource assessment will be completed on the GB Capital Component of the project to determine if there will be in -water marine biological impacts on eelgrass, sensitive species, and Essential Fish Habitat; that assessment will be included in the EIR. Moreover, any potential changes to small recreation vessel access (associated with the GB Capital Component and the potential change in use restrictions and allowable uses at the National City Aquatic Center) to the areas around the San Diego Bay Wildlife Refuge would be analyzed to determine if a potentially significant impact would occur. The proposed project includes a connector rail track as part of the Pasha Rail Improvement Component. This component would increase efficiency for Pasha's operations at the National City Marine Terminal (NCMT) by reducing maneuvering and train build times. It would not, however, increase throughput because throughput is a function of land availability, vehicle dwell time, and accessibility to empty railcars. In terms of land availability, the connector track would not increase available land, but under the Balanced Plan there would be a net loss of land available for Pasha. Regarding vehicle dwell time, the connector track would not necessarily decrease dwell time because dwell time is largely dependent on the vehicle manufacturer and the dealer (i.e., when the dealer is able to take possession of the vehicle). In terms of accessibility to empty rail cars, the connector track could theoretically increase the accessibility of empty railcars by providing a more direct link to the BNSF National City Yard; however, the availability of the empty railcars would still be dependent on whether BNSF has empty railcars and provides them to Pasha. Still, changes in train operations (not necessarily just additional trains) or location could result in an impact in the area near a Wildlife Refuge. Therefore, this issue will be further analyzed in the EIR. Because development of vacant parcels, in -water work, the Bayshore Bikeway, and changes in train operations may result in impacts on sensitive species, a more detailed analysis will be provided in the EIR. b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 17 ICF 00152.17 428 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Potentially Significant Impact. Riparian habitat is composed of vegetation and physical features normally found on stream banks and flood plains and is directly associated with streams, lakes, or other bodies of water. The proposed project includes construction on Parcel B6, which is currently undeveloped, and also construction and operation of the Bayshore Bikeway in the area east and north of Parcel B6. These areas of the proposed project are adjacent to the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit. The biological survey conducted on this parcel and the area south of the existing hotel (Dudek 2017) identified Diegan coastal sage scrub, which is a special -status plant community, as well as southern coastal salt marsh and saltpan/mudflats. The EIR would include further evaluation of the potential impacts on sensitive -species plants and wildlife throughout the project sites, including Parcel B6. The GB Capital Component of the proposed project may result in marine impacts related to the proposed in -water work. A Marine Biological Resource assessment will be conducted to evaluate the proposed project's effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community (including eelgrass) identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. A full analysis will be provided in the EIR to determine if a significant impact would occur. c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marshes, vernal pools, coastal wetlands, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Potentially Significant Impact. The San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit, located along the eastern boundary of the proposed project sites, is classified as wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Proposed project components, including the potential alignments of the Bayshore Bikeway and the undeveloped Parcel B6 of the GB Capital Component site, may result in potential edge effects on the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit. The proposed project could potentially have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands. Therefore, this issue will be discussed further in the EIR. d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less -than -Significant Impact. The project sites consist primarily of developed land and are not wildlife corridors or native wildlife nursery sites. The proposed project would not interfere with movement of wildlife and would not affect wildlife corridors. The building height(s) of the hotel(s) have the potential to impact migratory birds and the Pacific Flyway, but given that the project is being proposed in a heavily developed area, migrating birds would navigate around the structure(s) as they do around other buildings in the downtown. In addition, it would not be within the boundaries of a native wildlife nursery and would not otherwise interfere with the use of native wildlife nursery sites. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. e. Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Potentially Significant Impact. The applicable local land use plans, policies, ordinances, or regulations of the District, adopted for the purpose of protecting biological resources, are the Port National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 18 ICF 00152.17 429 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Master Plan, San Diego Unified Port District Code, and the District's Integrated National Resources Management Plan (INRMP). The District and the U.S. Navy Southwest Division maintain and implement the INRMP. Additionally, the District has established goals to protect, preserve, and enhance natural resources in San Diego Bay in Section II of the PMP, Planning Goals (Goal XI). The project sites are not located in areas identified for conservation purposes by the District. (Conservation areas are located in Planning Districts 7, 8, and 9.) However, the project sites are located next to the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit, as previously mentioned, and may result in conflicts with goals or policies intended to protect resources within this refuge area. In addition, the City Program (Development and Plan Amendments Components) site would be subject to the National City General Plan, Land Use Code, Local Coastal Program, and Harbor District Specific Area Plan policies and implementation guidelines regarding Conservation and Open Space intended to protect biological resources in the City. Consequently, this issue will be further discussed in the EIR. f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted habitat conservation plan, natural community conservation plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Significant Impact. As previously mentioned, the District and the U.S. Navy Southwest Division maintain the INRMP, which catalogues the plant and animal species around the Bay and identifies habitat types to ensure the long-term health, recovery, and protection of San Diego Bay's ecosystem in concert with economic, Naval, recreational, navigational, and fisheries needs. Development of the proposed project will be reviewed with the goals and intent of the INRMP and a more detailed analysis will be provided in the EIR. The San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater March Unit, is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and management of the refuge is guided by the Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP). The CCP provides the following guiding principles for the Sweetwater Marsh Unit: Goal 1: Protect, manage, enhance, and restore coastal wetland and upland habitats to benefit native fish, wildlife, and plant species within the Sweetwater Marsh Unit. Goal 2: Support recovery and protection efforts for the federally and state listed threatened and endangered species and species of concern that occur within the Sweetwater Marsh Unit. Goal 3: Protect and restore the environmental health of the Refuge's coastal salt marsh and upland habitats by making contaminants remediation a priority for Refuge lands, adjacent properties, and upstream developments. Goal 4: Provide outstanding environmental education programs for all ages in partnership with the Chula Vista Nature Center and other public agencies and non -governmental organizations. Goal 5: Provide quality wildlife -dependent recreation, interpretation, and outreach opportunities to enhance public appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the Refuge's biological and cultural resources. The Bayshore Bikeway component of the proposed project would be subject to the goals established for the Sweetwater Marsh in the CCP. The Balanced Plan Component of the proposed project would help reach Goal 5 through the expanded use of the aquatic center element of the project. The City Program ((Development and Plan Amendments Components) site would be subject to the National City General Plan, Land Use Code, Local Coastal Program, and Harbor District Specific Area Plan policies and implementation guidelines regarding Conservation and Open Space intended to National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 19 ICF 00152.17 430 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist protect biological resources in the City. Based on the location and type of project that could be constructed on the City Program site, the proposed project could result in a conflict with adopted habitat conservation plans, and this issue will be discussed further in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 20 ICF 00152.17 431 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist V. Cultural Resources Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project involves the potential relocation of Granger Hall to Pepper Park. Granger Hall is listed in the National Register of Historical Places (NRHP). A resource listed in the NRHP is automatically listed in the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). As such, Granger Hall qualifies as a historical resource per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. The existing NRHP registration form prepared for Granger Hall specifies "areas of significance" that can generally be translated into the more recent NRHP Listing Criteria. It appears that Criterion C would likely apply to Granger Hall, while Criteria A and B would not. A technical memorandum will be prepared to update the existing documentation and document the current condition of the building. The technical memorandum will include an integrity analysis and assessment of the building's character -defining features, and will specify the current applicable Listing Criteria codified by the National Park Service since the building was listed in the mid-1970s. Two other significant historical resources are located within the project area. One is the National City Santa Fe Depot, which is listed in the NRHP under Criteria A and C. As a property listed in the NRHP, the National City Santa Fe Depot qualifies as a historical resource per State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5. Additionally, a segment of the Coronado Belt Line (CA-SDI-13073) is located within a portion of the proposed project's Bayshore Bikeway component, along the west side of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit. A segment of this resource located outside of National City has been listed on a local register of historical resources. The segment of the Coronado Belt Line located within the project area will be evaluated as part of the cultural resources technical study to determine if it qualifies as a historical resource under CEQA, and addressed in the EIR. b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? Potentially Significant Impact. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 defines an archaeological resource as any artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that, without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that the resource: National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 21 ICF 00152.17 432 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist • Contains information, with demonstrable public interest in that information, needed to answer important scientific research questions; or • Has a special and particular quality, such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type; or • Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. A record search was conducted by the South Coastal Information Center (SCIC) on April 24, 2017, for the District's Port Master Plan Update, which is currently underway. The area encompassed by that record search includes the current project boundary and an approximately quarter -mile buffer. The SCIC maintains the California Historical Resource Information System database for San Diego County and keeps a record of all reported cultural resource studies and findings within San Diego County. The record search revealed that no previously recorded resources are located within the proposed project area; however, two cultural resources (CA-SDI-7454 and CA-SDI-13073) are located adjacent to and within the project area. CA-SDI-7454, mapped as intersecting with Bayshore Bikeway alignments Route 1, 2, and 3, was recorded as a shell midden in 1979; an update in 2002 failed to relocate the site. CA-SDI-13073 consists of the Coronado Belt Line Railroad. As noted above, a segment of this resource is located within a portion of the proposed project's Bayshore Bikeway component, and will be addressed in the EIR. In addition to the record search, a review of historic maps and aerials was conducted. ICF archaeologists collected historic shoreline data of the project area by obtaining digitized and georeferenced historical U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey maps (Alden 1857). For Parcel B6, the historic shoreline data indicated that the area west of Marina Way consisted of San Diego Bay waters prior to 1857. A review of a 1904 San Diego United Sates Geological Survey (USGS) topographic map indicated that the area east of Marina Way consisted of what is now the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh Unit. Historic aerials (NETR 2017 - photographs from 1953, 1964, 1966, 1980) show extensive changes to Parcel B6 in the form of import of fill and redirection and channelization of Sweetwater Channel. For this reason, there does not appear to be any possibility that archaeological deposits exist anywhere near the surface of Parcel B6 today. According to historic maps (USGS 1904), the seven parcels within the City Program were historically located above the high tide mark and show urban development in the early 20th century. The parcels are currently vacant and given the age of development in this area, potential for historic cultural resources cannot be ruled out. Project -related activities involving ground disturbance could cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological or historic resource. Further discussion will be provided in the EIR. c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Potentially Significant Impact. The San Diego Natural History Museum conducted a paleontological record search on May 1, 2017, for the District's Port Master Plan Update, which encompasses Parcel B6. The search revealed that Parcel B6 consists of artificial fill and Holocene marine deposits. The museum assigned a paleontological resource sensitivity rank to each geologic unit following City of San Diego and County of San Diego Guidelines (City of San Diego 2007, County of San Diego 2009). Artificial fill is assigned no (zero) paleontological sensitivity because artificial fill National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 22 ICF 00152.17 433 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist has been previously disturbed and may have been imported to the site, and any contained fossils have lost their contextual data and are thus of little scientific value. Holocene marine deposits are generally less than 10,000 years old and are assigned a low paleontological sensitivity based on their young geologic age and lack of known fossil localities. The seven City Program parcels were not included in the Port Master Plan Update's paleontological record search; therefore, a paleontological records search from the San Diego Natural History Museum will be obtained for the proposed project. Preliminary research indicates that the seven City Program parcels are underlain by Old Paralic Deposits, which is assigned a high paleontological sensitivity rating for the diverse and well-preserved fossils of marine invertebrates and marine vertebrates that have been recovered from these deposits. Construction activity, including ground excavation, associated with the proposed project could potentially destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. Further discussion will be provided in the EIR. d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed project is not a formal cemetery and is not near a formal cemetery. The proposed project and surrounding area are either fully developed or in active waters, and there is no record of human remains being identified during development of the area. The site is not known to be on a burial ground. For these reasons, the potential for human remains to be present at the project site is extremely low. However, if human remains are discovered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that further disturbance and activities will cease in any area suspected to overlie remains and that the County Coroner be contacted. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98, if the remains are thought to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, who will then notify the Most Likely Descendant. Further provisions of PRC Section 5097.98 are to be followed as applicable. Therefore, through compliance with the existing regulations, the construction and operation of the proposed project would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 23 ICF 00152.17 434 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist VI. Geology and Soils Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? 3. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? 4. Landslides? b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in an onsite or offsite landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems in areas where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? ❑ ❑ ❑ a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 1. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed project would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects from the rupture of a known earthquake fault, because no active faults are identified within the project sites. According to the California Geological Survey National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 24 ICF 00152.17 435 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist (California Department of Conservation 2010). Because there are no faults within the project sites, and ground disturbance activities associated with the proposed project are not likely to influence the potential for fault rupturing, construction and operation of the proposed project would not exacerbate the existing fault conditions. The project would not exacerbate the potential of a fault rupture, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. 2. Strong seismic ground shaking? Less -than -Significant Impact. The project sites are in an area that is susceptible to seismic ground shaking. The closest fault line to the project sites, the Rose Canyon fault zone, is approximately 0.45 mile west, in the San Diego Bay (California Department of Conservation 2010). That fault line, Elsinore fault, is approximately 40 miles to the northeast. Additionally, the project sites are in Seismic Zone 4, which is a designation used to denote the areas with the highest risk to earthquake ground motion (California Seismic Safety Commission 2005). The project sites are in a medium -low Probabilistic Peak Ground Acceleration Area, which correlates to how hard the earth shakes in a given area (City of National City 2011). The project sites are underlain by Soft Soil types, categorized by the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program as soils that may amplify the ground shaking effects of earthquakes. Consequently, a seismic event within the Rose Canyon fault zone could cause significant ground shaking on the project site; however, design and construction of the proposed project would comply with all seismic -safety development requirements, including Title 24 standards of the current California Building Code. More importantly for purposes of CEQA, the proposed project would not include any characteristics that might exacerbate the potential for strong seismic ground shaking. As such, less -than -significant impacts from the project related to its potential to exacerbate strong seismic groundshaking in the area would occur. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. 3. Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less -than -Significant Impact. According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Web Soil Survey; the project sites are underlain by three types of soils: Huerhuero-Urban land complex, Made land, and Tidal flats. Tidal flats are hydric soils, which are soils that are saturated or have wetland characteristics, and can increase the potential of liquefaction. The Tidal flats are primarily associated with the Sweetwater Marsh Unit and only occur on the eastern border of the project sites directly adjacent to the marsh, where the Bayshore Bikeway project component is proposed (USDA 2018). The project sites are mostly underlain by either Made land (fill) or Huerhuero-Urban land complex, which have a low liquefaction risk. Moreover, design and construction of the proposed project would comply with all seismic -safety development requirements, including Title 24 standards of the current California Building Code. Because the project would be engineered to eliminate the low liquefaction hazard, and because the project would not have the potential to exacerbate the potential for liquefaction to occur, less -than -significant impacts associated with liquefaction or other seismic -related ground failure would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. 4. Landslides? No Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a substantial adverse effect from landslides. Landslide risk is determined by steep slopes that have 25% or greater incline, soil type, and soil -slip susceptibility, as defined by the USGS. The northeastern portion of Parcel B6 (of the Balanced Plan) slopes towards the San Diego Bay National National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 25 ICF 00152.17 436 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Wildlife Refuge, and Sweetwater Marsh Unit; however, the sloped area is part of the 200-foot setback from the refuge boundary, so no buildings would be located there. Route 3 of the Bayshore Bikeway Component is proposed to be located in this sloped area; however, it would be sited in locations that do not exceed a 25% slope. Therefore, the proposed project would not exacerbate the potential of a landslide occurring, and impacts would not be significant. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less -than -Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Erosion is a condition that could adversely affect development on any site. Construction activities could exacerbate erosion conditions by exposing soil and adding water to the soil, either from irrigation or runoff from new impervious surfaces. The General Construction Permit, which was adopted by the State Water Resources Control Board as Water Quality Order 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and Order 2012-006-DWQ is required for soil disturbance activities that would be greater than 1 acre. It is anticipated that all components of the proposed project would involve construction activities with soil disturbance over 1 acre, and therefore each would be subject to the General Construction Permit. As such, each project component with soil disturbance over 1 acre is required to develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP will include Best Management Practices (BMPs), such as sediment and erosion control measures, to prevent pollutants from leaving the sites that would be employed during construction. Furthermore, the project components would need to comply with the City's grading ordinance. In addition, consistent with the District's Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program (JRMP) (pursuant to State Water Resources Control Board Order No. R9-2013-0001, as amended by Order No. R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015-0100 [NPDES Permit #CAS0109266, Municipal Permit]), the components of the proposed project that are located within District jurisdiction would be designed with BMPs consistent with the District's BMP Design Manual, which requires the use of low -impact development BMPs, as well as source control and treatment control BMPs (District 2016). Future development associated with the City Program (Development and Plan Amendments Components) would be designed with BMPs consistent with the City's JRMP and the City's BMP Design Manual, which requires the use of low -impact development BMPs, as well as source control and treatment control BMPs (City 2018). Therefore, both construction and operational impacts related to soil erosion or loss of topsoil would be less than significant. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or that would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in an on -site or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Less -Than -Significant Impact. Bay deposits that underlie the project sites could be unstable because of their liquefaction potential. As discussed under VI.a.4, the project sites do not contain slopes exceeding a 25% grade, and they would not be susceptible to on- or offsite landslides. The project sites are mostly underlain by either Made land (fill) or Huerhuero-Urban land complex, which have a low liquefaction risk. Moreover, design and construction of the proposed project would comply with all seismic -safety development requirements, including Title 24 standards of the current California Building Code, and the National City Municipal Code, Section 15.70 (grading ordinance) (City of National City 2018). Because the project would be engineered to eliminate the National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 26 ICF 00152.17 437 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist low liquefaction hazard and because the project would not have the potential to exacerbate the potential for liquefaction to occur, no impact associated with liquefaction or other seismic -related ground failure would occur. Due to these onsite conditions and compliance with the applicable regulations, impacts would be less than significant because the proposed project would not exacerbate existing unstable conditions. Further discussion is not warranted in the EIR. d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less -Than -Significant Impact. Expansive soils are fine-grained soils (generally high -plasticity clays) that can undergo a significant increase in volume with an increase in water content as well as a significant decrease in volume with a decrease in water content. Changes in the water content of highly expansive soils can result in severe distress for structures constructed on or against the soils. Underlying soils found on site are partially composed of clays and, as such, could be subject to expansion. Huerhuero-Urban land complex (2 to 9% slope) has a high shrink -swell behavior, Made land has variable shrink -swell behavior, and Tidal flats have a high shrink -swell behavior (USDA 1973). Should any soil failure occur, risks to life or property associated with the proposed project may increase due to the construction of new structures, which would increase the number of people within the project sites. Construction of the proposed project would be subject to applicable ordinances of the current California Building Code (California Code of Regulations Title 24), and expansive soils would be removed and replaced with engineered soil. Further discussion is not warranted in the EIR. e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems in areas where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems are proposed; therefore, no impact would occur. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 27 ICF 00152.17 438 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Vll. Greenhouse Gas Emissions Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? a. Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Potentially Significant Impact. Construction and operation of the proposed project would result in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in greater quantities than existing conditions. Construction of the project's various components, including but not limited to, demolition of structures and roadways, installation of the connector track, changes to Pepper Park, and construction of new buildings or structures, would generate GHG emissions. Once constructed, the proposed project would change vehicle traffic patterns and quantities in the project area due to the expanded park, park/plaza, commercial recreational, and maritime uses, all of which would generate GHG emissions. Emissions sources such as vessels, trucks, passenger vans, and electricity and water use that may increase with the proposed project will be analyzed in the EIR. This potential increase in GHG emissions could potentially, either directly or indirectly, have a significant impact on the environment by exceeding established thresholds for GHG emissions. In addition, the EIR will consider the physical effects of climate change on the proposed project; this includes conducting a sea level rise analysis. The sea level rise analysis will be conducted using best available science, which as of publication of this NOP is the Ocean Protection Council's State of California Sea Level Rise Guidance: 2018 Update (OPC 2018 Update). More specifically, for sea level rise analyses, the District currently uses the following short-, medium-, and long-term sea level rise projections/scenarios (both with and without storm events) from the OPC 2018 Update: high emissions (RFP 8.5) for the 1-in-20 change or 5% probability for years 2030 (0.7 feet sea level rise), 2050 (1.4 feet sea level rise), and 2100 (4.5 feet sea level rise), and also the median or 50% probability for year 2100 (2.6 feet sea level rise). The analysis will identify any areas of potential impacts due to potential future increases in mean sea level rise (temporary coastal flooding, and permanent inundation) and if the project exacerbates potential impacts on the environment resulting from sea level rise or associated events (e.g., coastal flooding, wave overtopping, erosion, etc.). b. Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Potentially Significant Impact. The District has enacted a variety of policies and plans to reduce GHG emissions as part of its Climate Action Plan, including the implementation of shore power, equipment and truck replacement/retrofits, vessel speed reductions, and the Clean Truck Program. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 28 ICF 00152.17 439 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist In addition, the City adopted a Climate Action Plan in 2011. The project would increase GHG emissions and may therefore conflict with or impede implementation of plans, policies, or regulations that were adopted to reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, this issue will be analyzed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 29 ICF 00152.17 440 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c. Emit hazardous emissions or involve handling hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d. Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e. Be located within an airport land use plan area or, where such a plan has not been adopted, be within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, and result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f. Be located within the vicinity of a private airstrip and result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? g. ❑ ❑ ❑ a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Less -than -Significant Impact. The proposed project would be required to comply with federal, state, and local regulations for the routine transport, use, and disposal of any hazardous materials. These regulations include the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), U.S. Department of National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 30 ICF 00152.17 441 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Transportation (DOT) Hazardous Materials Regulations (Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] Title 49), California Health and Safety Code, and San Diego County Code, Title 6, Division 8, in combination with legally required construction BMPs implemented from the SWPPP (under the General Construction Permit). Moreover, the proposed project would only include common hazardous materials such as fuels, oils, and solvents in relatively small quantities associated with an increase in recreational marine vessels, movements associated with rail cars, and the construction and operation of commercial recreational uses such as the proposed hotels. Any accidental release of these materials due to spills or leaks would be cleaned up in the normal course of business, consistent with the above -mentioned regulations. Therefore, impacts associated with the potential to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Potentially Significant Impact. See the response to VIII.a. Construction -related hazardous materials would be used during project construction, including fuel, solvents, paints, oils, and grease. Any of these substances could be released during construction activities. However, compliance with federal, state, and local regulations in combination with legally required construction BMPs implemented from the SWPPP (under the General Construction Permit) would ensure that all hazardous materials would be used, stored, and disposed of properly, which would minimize potential impacts related to a hazardous materials release during the construction phase of the project. Therefore, construction -related impacts associated with the creation of a significant hazard will not be analyzed further in the EIR. Searches conducted using the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) website (GeoTracker) and the California Department of Toxic Substances Control database (EnviroStor) online records, along with documents obtained from the County of San Diego Department of Environmental Health, indicate that several closed hazardous materials sites are located near the proposed project. In addition, Geotracker identified one open case adjacent and east of the proposed Tidelands Avenue Closures component of the proposed project. The active Cleanup Program Site is identified as Bayshore Bikeway Segments 4B & 5 and was opened as of February 28, 2017 and will need to be further analyzed in the EIR (SWRCB 2018). It is possible that construction activities (i.e., grading and excavation) related to the project may encounter residual soil contamination given the location of these former contamination sites as well as the open Cleanup Program Site mentioned above. In addition, previous record searches indicated the National City Dump (or the Davies Dump) operated as a burn dump in the 1940s and 1950s in the project vicinity (District 2016). Construction activities at the proposed project sites could have the potential to disturb buried burn ash. This issue will be further analyzed in the EIR. c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within 0.25 mile of an existing or proposed school? Potentially Significant Impact. Project construction would require the use of typical materials associated with construction activities (e.g., diesel fuel, gasoline, oil, hydraulic fluid, asphalt and binders, and paint). Any hazardous materials used during project construction would be National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 31 ICF 00152.17 442 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist transported, used, and stored in accordance with state and federal regulations, as described above under VIII.b, regarding hazardous materials. Hotel and retail operations proposed by the project would also use solvents, cleaning agents, paints, pesticides, fuels, propane, antifreeze, oil filters, used oil, mercury lamps, batteries, and aerosol cans. These hazardous material products are generally used in small amounts, and any potential hazardous releases would be limited in scope and spill area and would be cleaned up soon after they occur as required by existing regulations, including the RCRA and the NPDES permit. Rail operations would be similar to existing operations and would comply with applicable laws and regulations. The nearest school is Kimball Elementary School, approximately 0.25 mile east of the Bayshore Bikeway alignment site. Because the project is located within 0.25 mile of an existing school, this is considered to be a potentially significant impact, and further discussion will be provided in the EIR. Therefore, project construction and operations would result in a less -than -significant impact related to hazards to the public or to the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. d. Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites that is compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Potentially Significant Impact. See the response to VIII.b. Given how close the open Cleanup Program Site is to the project sites, the EIR will provide a further analysis of the potential for the proposed project to be located on a listed hazardous materials site. Specifically, the demolition and construction activities associated with the Pasha Road Closures Component along Tidelands Avenue could disturb contaminated soil. This is considered to be a potentially significant impact, and further discussion will be provided in the EIR. e. For a project within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The project sites are not within the Airport Influence Area of any airport as defined by an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The San Diego International Airport is more than 5 miles to the north of the project sites. As such, implementation of the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The proposed project area is not within the vicinity of a private airstrip. The closest non- public airstrip facilities to the project sites are Naval Air Station (NAS) North Island and Naval Outlying Landing Field (NOLF) Imperial Beach. Both are approximately 5.5 miles from the project, with NAS North Island being closest to the north end of the project area and NOLF Imperial Beach being closest to the south end. As such, implementation of the proposed project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 32 ICF 00152.17 443 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist 9• Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Potentially Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project could potentially impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. As part of the proposed project, closure of Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive on the north and West 32nd Street on the south, and West 28th Street between Tidelands Avenue and Quay Avenue, and the potential narrowing or closure (to thru-traffic) of Bay Marina Drive at Marina Way may affect an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The proposed project would be required to comply with applicable requirements set forth by the County of San Diego Office of Emergency Services' Operational Area Emergency Plan, the National City Police Department, and the National City Fire Department. The Office of Emergency Services coordinates emergency response at the local level in the event of a disaster, including fires. Emergency response coordination is facilitated by the Operational Area Emergency Operations Center and responding agencies to the proposed project sites, the Southern Division of the National City Police Department, National City Fire Department Station No. 34, and San Diego Harbor Police Department. Because the project would change access in the area, further analysis will be provided in the EIR. h. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. The project sites are not within or adjacent to an area that has been identified as a wildland fire hazard area. According to the Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone maps prepared by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (2009), the proposed project is not within a High Fire Risk Area. Furthermore, the proposed project area is neither adjacent to nor intermixed with wildlands. No impacts would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 33 ICF 00152.17 444 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist IX. Hydrology and Water Quality Would the project: a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, resulting in a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite? d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding onsite or offsite? e. Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Contribute to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? j• Potentially Significant Impact Less -than - Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated El Less -than - Significant No Impact Impact ❑ ❑ ® ❑ EI EI National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 34 ICF 00152.17 445 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Potentially Significant Impact. Construction activities associated with the various physical components of the proposed project could potentially violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Construction activities such as demolition, grading and excavation, filling and compaction, rail improvements, marina expansion, and construction of above -ground facilities and buildings could degrade water quality by increasing polluted stormwater runoff. With heavy rain or wind conditions, during excavation or other ground -disturbing activities, erosion and sediment transport from the project sites and on- and offsite staging areas could increase. Stormwater runoff (or wind) could carry the exposed or eroded sediments to the storm drain system or directly into the Bay. Additionally, other pollutants, such as nutrients, trace metals, and hydrocarbons, can attach to sediment and be transported to the Bay, which could contribute to water quality degradation. Delivery, handling, and storage of construction materials and wastes, as well as the use of construction equipment, could also contaminate stormwater and affect water quality. As such, construction activities could violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. In sum, impacts from construction could include polluted stormwater runoff, erosion and sediment transport, hazardous materials contamination, or physical changes to the aquatic ecosystem. Accordingly, construction impacts on water quality would be potentially significant and could lead to exceedance of water quality objectives or criteria. This issue area will be analyzed in the EIR. Operation of the proposed project would increase impervious surface area and change land uses. The proposed project would develop existing undeveloped parcels (part of the GB Capital Component, and part of the City Program - Development Component) that would increase the impervious cover on the project sites, thus changing land use and increase the amount of pollutants generated on site that could discharge into the Bay during a storm event. Adding commercial and industrial uses could generate additional pollutants that could impair water quality if not treated prior to discharge. Typical pollutants associated with commercial and industrial land uses include but are not limited to suspended solids, pathogens, nutrients, pesticides, organic compounds, metals, trash/debris, oxygen -demanding substances, and oil and grease. The result may (further) impair receiving waters. Therefore, the proposed project could result in potentially significant impacts related to a violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. This issue area will be analyzed in the EIR. b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge, resulting in a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less -than -Significant Impact. The project sites are located within the Sweetwater Groundwater Basin. The primary recharge of the Sweetwater Valley Groundwater Basin is derived from seasonal runoff from precipitation in the upper reaches of the basin and from the Sweetwater Reservoir, including subsurface flows. Although the proposed project would increase the impervious surface area by developing some disturbed but undeveloped parcels, groundwater recharge would not be reduced by the proposed project. Groundwater beneath the project sites is largely seawater. While the proposed project would replace a portion of the existing landscaped pervious surface that contributes to groundwater recharge, because the groundwater is mainly seawater infiltrating the soils under the project sites, the project would not interfere substantially with groundwater National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 35 ICF 00152.17 446 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The proposed project does not include any wells to pump groundwater. Impacts related to substantial depletion of groundwater supplies and recharge would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. Short-term dewatering maybe necessary during construction of proposed foundations below 10 feet. Discharge of groundwater into storm drains and receiving waters has the potential to significantly affect water quality. However, the proposed project would be required to comply with dewatering requirements imposed by the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board general waste discharge requirements for discharges from temporary groundwater extraction and similar waste discharges to San Diego Bay (Order No. R9-2015-0013). The proposed project would be required to maintain compliance with the effluent limitations applicable to the receiving water, as specified in Order No. R9-2015-0013 (refer to Table 8 of the order). The permit requires permittees to conduct monitoring of dewatering discharges and adhere to effluent and receiving water limitations contained within the permit so that water quality of surface waters is protected. Compliance with the applicable dewatering permit would further ensure that the impacts of these discharges would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. Groundwater at the project sites is not used for drinking water and consequently would not impact drinking water. Impacts related to lowering the groundwater table and groundwater recharge would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on site or off site? Less -than -Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the project sites, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river. The proposed project would continue to discharge directly to the San Diego Bay and would not result in erosion or siltation by nature of the receiving Bay waters (i.e., not a typical channel with bed and banks subject to erosion). Therefore, the proposed project does not include changes to the existing storm drain system that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on site or off site. However, stormwater discharges from the site would be treated in accordance with the District's or City's JRMP and directed to the storm drain system and discharge to San Diego Bay. Therefore, downstream erosion would not occur. Impacts related to substantial erosion or siltation on site or off site would be less than significant. However, this issue area will be evaluated further in the EIR to identify compliance methods with the District's or City's JRMP. d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on site or off site? Less -than -Significant Impact. The existing drainage patterns would not be substantially altered; no streams or rivers exist on site. The proposed project would develop some existing undeveloped parcels, which would increase the rate or amount of stormwater runoff due to the additional impervious surface area. The increased runoff would be managed by the inclusion of new stormwater facilities in compliance with the District's or City's JRMP; the stormwater would continue to discharge directly to the San Diego Bay and would not result in flooding by nature of the receiving Bay waters. Therefore, potential for flooding on site or off site is low. However, this issue area will be evaluated further in the EIR to identify compliance with the District's or City's JRMP. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 36 ICF 00152.17 447 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist e. Create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in a significant increase in runoff water compared to the existing conditions because the project sites are mostly developed or graded. However, the proposed project would increase impervious surfaces associated with development of the undeveloped parcels in the GB Capital Component and the City Program - Development Component. Those new land uses, compared to existing conditions, may result in additional sources of polluted runoff during construction and operational activities, as discussed under IX.a. Therefore, this issue will be further analyzed in the EIR. f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g• Potentially Significant Impact. As described under IX.a and IX.e, the proposed project would result in potentially significant short-term construction and long-term operational impacts on water quality. Therefore, impacts could be potentially significant, and this issue area will be further analyzed in the EIR. Place housing within a 100 year flood hazard area, as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. No housing is proposed on site, nor are the sites on a 100-year floodplain. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) delineates floodplains throughout the nation and presents the data on Flood Insurance Rate Maps, which illustrate that the proposed project sites are outside of the 100-year floodplain (FEMA 2014). Therefore, no related impacts would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. h. Place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. As indicated above under IX.g, the proposed project sites are not within a 100-year floodplain. Therefore, no impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. i. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less -than -Significant Impact. Dam failures are rated as a low -probability, high -loss event. Only two major dam failures have ever been recorded in San Diego County. These occurred in 1916 and were caused by a flood event (County of San Diego 2010). The project sites are downstream of the Sweetwater Dam, which is approximately 6 miles to the east. The Sweetwater Dam was given a condition assessment of "fair" in 2017 by the California Natural Resources Agency, Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (NRA 2017). In the event of a dam failure or failure of the levees along the Sweetwater River Channel, portions of National City including the project sites, are at high risk of inundation (County of San Diego 2011). An emergency evacuation plan is in place for the Sweetwater Dam, however, and would be implemented in the unlikely event that the dam fails. Construction and operation of the proposed project would develop some existing undeveloped parcels that would expose additional people and structures to risk of flooding from dam inundation in the event of dam failure. While new structures would be located within areas prone to flooding, the proposed project would not exacerbate the flooding potential of the project sites or the effects of National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 37 ICF 00152.17 448 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist l• flooding on the existing environment and would not impair dam safety. Impacts would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. Contribute to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Potentially Significant Impact The California Emergency Management Agency has developed detailed tsunami inundation maps. According to the maps for National City, portions of the project sites are located within the tsunami hazard zone (California Department of Conservation 2009). Therefore, the project would result in impacts related to potential tsunami inundation, and this issue would require further analysis in the EIR. Seiches are waves generated in an enclosed body of water, such as the Sweetwater Reservoir, approximately 6 miles to the east of the project sites, from seismic activity. Seiches are similar to tsunamis but are for enclosed bays, inlets, and lakes. These tsunami -like waves can be generated by earthquakes, subsidence or uplift of large blocks of land, submarine and onshore landslides, sediment failures, and volcanic eruptions. The strong currents associated with these events may be more damaging than inundation by waves. Sweetwater Reservoir is considered to be too far away to affect the project sites. The closest body of water that could experience an earthquake -induced seiche is San Diego Bay, adjacent to the project sites. However, it is generally believed that a seismic event of sufficient magnitude to cause a seiche capable of causing significant damage would be of unprecedented scale for the region and, therefore, is remote and speculative (City of San Diego 2007). Therefore, no impact on the project sites would result from inundation caused by a seiche, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. The risk of mudslides, or flood -induced landslides, is determined by a combination of factors, including slopes with gradient of 25% or greater, soil series data, and soil -slip susceptibility. Steep topography and high levels of precipitation are the primary requirements to generate a mudflow. The project sites are in an area with generally flat topography that does not have the relief or slope to support a mudflow (City of National City 2012). Therefore, the proposed project would not result in impacts associated with mudflows, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 38 ICF 00152.17 449 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist X. Land Use and Planning Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Physically divide an established community? b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? ® ❑ u a. Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The proposed project would not physically divide an established community. The proposed project would reconfigure the existing mix of land uses in the National City Marina District and nearby City Program sites to create a better connected area for commercial -recreational development while allowing improvements to the existing industrial areas by closing District streets to allow for contiguous cargo storage areas. No impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. b. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, a general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Potentially Significant Impact. The project would require a PMPA, Coastal Development Permits, and amendments to City planning documents (i.e., General Plan, Local Coastal Program, Harbor District Specific Area Plan, Land Use Code, and Bicycle Master Plan). The EIR will discuss consistency with all applicable objectives and policies from all the relevant regulations and plans, including Chapters 3 and 8 of the Coastal Act. Sea level rise and consistency with the Coastal Act will also be included in the proposed climate change analysis (see Section VII, Greenhouse Gas Emissions). Therefore, this issue will be analyzed further in the EIR. c. Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Potentially Significant Impact. Please see the response to IV.f., which provides the response to the same question. As stated previously, this issue will be discussed further in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 39 ICF 00152.17 450 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XL Mineral Resources Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally ❑ ❑ ❑ El important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The project sites are in an area characterized by marine -related industrial activities and visitor -serving commercial uses that does not contain any known mineral resources. No commercial mining operations exist on the project sites or in the immediate vicinity. The project sites and the surrounding area are not designated or zoned as land with the availability of mineral resources (City of San Diego 2008). The proposed project is located within Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ)-1, which indicates that no significant mineral deposits are present or they are unlikely to exist (CGS 2017). In addition, the project sites do not contain aggregate resources and are not located in a mineral resource zone that contains important resources, as designated by the California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a loss of known mineral resources. No impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? No Impact. See the response to XI.a. The PMP and City Planning Documents do not identify any mineral resources in the area or designated plans for mineral resource extraction. The project sites and the surrounding area contain a limited amount of land suitable for the extraction of mineral resources. Salt production occurs approximately 2.6 miles south of the project site within the South San Diego Bay Unit of the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge. However, salt ponds are not located within the project sites and would not be impacted by implementation of the proposed project (City of San Diego 2008). The project would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or regionally or locally important mineral resource recovery site. No impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 40 ICF 00152.17 451 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XII. Noise Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in a local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? b. Expose persons to or generate excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c. Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d. Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e. Be located within an airport land use plan area, or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport and expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f. Be located in the vicinity of a private airstrip ❑ ❑ ❑ and expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? a. Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Potentially Significant Impact. Project construction and operation would result in additional noise sources, as discussed below. Construction and operational noise will be analyzed in the EIR in relation to their impact on sensitive noise receptors. Noise -sensitive land uses typically include residential uses, hospitals, nursing facilities, places of worship, open space, intermediate care facilities, child educational facilities, libraries, museums, and childcare facilities (National City 2011). The District also considers parks and hotels to be noise sensitive during certain hours of operation. Parks, which are closed during nighttime hours, are considered to be noise sensitive only during the daytime and evening hours of 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. Hotels are considered to be noise sensitive only during the evening and nighttime hours of 7 p.m. to 7 a.m. The nearest sensitive noise receptors to the project sites are residences to the north, on Cleveland Avenue at W 22nd Street, and the Best Western Marina Gateway Hotel at Bay Marina Drive and Marina Way. The proposed bikeway alignment would also pass existing homes on McKinley Avenue. Additional noise -sensitive uses are generally located farther from the proposed project, on the opposite (i.e., east) side of Interstate 5. Pepper Park would typically be considered a noise -sensitive receptor; however, because in this case the park is actually part of the proposed project, it may not be considered a noise -sensitive receptor in this instance. The park's relationship to the other elements of the proposed project will be considered further in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 41 ICF 00152.17 452 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist Use of equipment associated with project construction would temporarily increase the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the proposed project. Construction noise sources are anticipated to include pile drivers, dewatering pumps, cranes, forklifts, concrete trucks, bulldozers, bobcats, excavators, backhoes, and concrete pump -towers. Due to the proximity of noise -sensitive receptors, construction noise impacts are potentially significant. Therefore, the EIR will analyze potential construction noise impacts based on the details of the equipment required for the various construction phases (demolition, grading, etc.) and of each project component. In -water construction activities would potentially occur as part of the GB Capital Component, including additional moorings and improvements to the marina. Underwater (hydroacoustic) noise levels associated with in -water construction activities will also be analyzed in the EIR. Project operational noise sources would include additional traffic on the surrounding streets and occasional events at Pepper Park. It is anticipated that there would be no noticeable change in noise levels associated with rail use or cargo activities as these uses already exist and it is not anticipated that there would be a significant increase in operations. Noise associated with the onsite operations at the proposed hotels, RV park, and other visitor -serving commercial uses would generally be limited and localized to the project sites. Offsite noise is expected to be limited mainly to vehicular noise on the surrounding roadways. However, the EIR will analyze the potential for any land use compatibility issues and significant operational noise increases from the project. b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Potentially Significant Impact On -road vehicular traffic does not typically produce perceptible levels of vibration outside of the right-of-way, and the proposed onsite operational activities do not include substantial vibration sources that would generate perceptible levels of vibration beyond the project boundaries. Therefore, further analysis of these operational elements of the project is not required. The primary sources of groundborne vibration and noise associated with the project would be heavy construction activities (such as pile driving, demolition, and grading) and freight rail operations. Vibration from trains is unlikely to be significant due to the distance from sensitive receptors. Nonetheless, vibration from both construction activities and rail operations will be evaluated in the EIR. c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant Impact. See response to XII.a. Construction noise would be temporary and, as such, would not cause any permanent increases in ambient noise levels. Permanent operational noise sources associated with the project could include additional traffic on the surrounding streets and onsite operations at the proposed new uses (hotels, RV park, and other visitor -serving commercial uses). This issue area will be analyzed in the EIR. d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Potentially Significant Impact. Project construction activities may result in an increase in temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels that could impact sensitive receptors. In addition, occasional events at Pepper Park may result in substantial temporary noise increases. Therefore, the project's potential to result in temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise would be potentially significant and will be evaluated in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 42 ICF 00152.17 453 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist e. For a project located within an airport land use land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project sites are not within the Airport Influence Area of any airport as defined by an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The San Diego International Airport is more than 5 miles to the north of the project sites. As a result, the project would not expose people residing or working within the project area to excessive airport noise levels. There would be no impact, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no private airstrips within 2 miles of the project sites. The closest non-public air facilities to the project sites are NAS North Island and NOLF Imperial Beach. Both are approximately 5.5 miles from the project, with NAS North Island being closest to the north end of the project area and NOLF Imperial Beach being closest to the south end. As a result, the project would not expose people residing or working within the project area to excessive private airstrip noise levels. There would be no impact, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 43 ICF 00152.17 454 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XIII. Population and Housing Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Induce substantial population growth in an ® ❑ ❑ ❑ area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b. Displace a substantial number of existing housing units, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c. Displace a substantial number of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (e.g., by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (e.g., through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Potentially Significant Impact The proposed project would expand operational activities in the area and would create additional operational jobs. The proposed project would not extend, or create the need for, infrastructure expansion into previously undeveloped areas. The project sites are currently served by existing roadways, water, wastewater, gas, and electrical infrastructure. Land uses that surround the project sites are also served by existing utilities. The proposed project would not involve the addition of any growth - inducing infrastructure, including water and gas lines or electricity, into previously undeveloped areas, because the project sites are within a developed area. The implementation of the proposed project would require the addition of new employees and would temporarily increase the number of construction workers in the area. The additional jobs are anticipated to be filled by residents currently living in the San Diego region; however, it is possible the additional job opportunities could induce population growth to the area due to relocation to the area. Because the development would require an amendment, and is not currently planned for these parcels, the potential jobs created as a result of the proposed project could result in inducing population growth in the surrounding area that has not been previously anticipated. This issue area will be further analyzed in the EIR. b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The project sites are currently developed with maritime industrial, commercial, and recreational uses, and no existing housing units or persons are located on the project sites. No residential land uses are within the project sites or surrounding area. The proposed project would not displace any housing units or necessitate the construction of housing units elsewhere. Therefore, there would be no impact, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 44 ICF 00152.17 455 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. As discussed under XIII.a and XIII.b above, the project sites are currently developed with maritime industrial, commercial, and recreational uses, and no existing housing units or persons are located on the project sites. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in the displacement of people, nor would it necessitate the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impact would occur, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 45 ICF 00152.17 456 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XIV. Public Services Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities or a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: 1. Fire protection? 2. Police protection? 3. Schools? 4. Parks? 5. Other public facilities? El El 0 0 ® ❑ ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ ❑ a. Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of, or the need for, new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: 1. Fire protection? Potentially Significant Impact. Implementation of the proposed project would lead to more visitors to the project area and would create new structures in areas where there are currently none. This would potentially place increased demand on the National City Fire Department and the Harbor Police Department, both of which provide fire protection services to the project area. Although it is unlikely that the proposed project would require a new fire station or expansion of an existing one, this issue requires further analysis in the EIR. 2. Police protection? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would result in an increase in visitors to the area and additional employees during construction and operation of the proposed project. As such, the proposed project may increase the demand on the National City Police Department and the Harbor Police Department. As with fire protection services, although it is unlikely that the proposed project would require new or expanded police protection facilities, this issue requires further analysis and will be discussed in the EIR. 3. Schools? Potentially Significant Impact. Physical impacts on school facilities and services are typically associated with population in -migration and growth, which increase the demand for schools, the construction of which may result in physical impacts on the environment. Implementation of the National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 46 ICF 00152.17 457 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist proposed project would potentially increase the number of jobs that would be created as a result of construction and operation of the project. These jobs are anticipated to be filled by the local residents in the San Diego region; however, it is possible the increase in job opportunities could induce population growth not currently planned to fill the new jobs. Population growth in the area could result in higher demand for the neighborhood schools, which could result in a need for new or physically altered school facilities. This issue area will be further analyzed in the EIR. 4. Parks? Potentially Significant Impact. As discussed below in Section XV, Recreation, Pepper Park is located within the project site and would be expanded by approximately 2.54 acres from approximately 5.22 acres to approximately 7.76 acres under the proposed project. The project also includes modifications to existing operational restrictions and an expansion of allowed uses (i.e., aquaculture or environmental conservation) that could increase the use of the Aquatic Center. Impacts associated with the expansion of and increased use of recreational facilities could result in a significant impact. This issue area will be further analyzed in the EIR. 5. Other public facilities? Potentially Significant Impact. As discussed above, the proposed project could induce local population growth has a result of creating additional jobs. This population increase may result in an increased demand requiring the need for new or physically altered public facilities, for example public libraries or post offices, and could result in a significant impact. This issue area will be further analyzed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 47 ICF 00152.17 458 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XV. Recreation Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and ® ❑ ❑ ❑ regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b. Include recreational facilities or require the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ construction or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? a. Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would expand Pepper Park by approximately 2.54 acres from approximately 5.22 acres to approximately 7.76 acres. Although the Pepper Park expansion has not yet been designed, the EIR will analyze possible park features, which may or may not ultimately be included in the final design of the park. In addition, the project includes modifications to existing operational restrictions and expansion of allowed uses (i.e., aquaculture or environmental conservation) that could increase the use of the recreational facility. This issue area will be further analyzed in the EIR. b. Include recreational facilities or require the construction of or expansion of recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would include expansion of recreational facilities that may result in an adverse physical effect on the environment. The proposed project includes modifications to operational restrictions and an expansion of allowed uses (i.e., aquaculture or environmental conservation) of the Aquatic Center and expansion of Pepper Park, and also includes construction and operation of Segment 5 of Bayshore Bikeway. The GB Capital Component also includes construction and operation of new and expanded recreational facilities. Therefore, the proposed project would include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of other recreational facilities that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment. This issue area will be analyzed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 48 ICF 00152.17 459 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XVL Transportation/Traffic Would the project: a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d. Substantially increase hazards because of a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e. Result in inadequate emergency access? f. Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Potentially Significant Impact Less -than - Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less -than - Significant No Impact Impact a. Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase the number of daily and, potentially, peak hour trips to and from the project area. As such, a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) will be prepared to assess roadway segments, intersections, and freeway mainline segments. A net trip generation change based on the proposed land and water use changes will be developed and assigned trips to the adjacent roadway network based on trip generation estimates and existing travel patterns and redistribute exiting trips that may be affected by the proposed network changes. The TIA will include an analysis of both construction and operational traffic, a parking analysis, as well as calculating the project's fair share percentages in the mitigation measures. Impact National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 49 ICF 00152.17 460 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist determinations based on Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines, along with any necessary mitigation, will be summarized in the EIR. b. Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Potentially Significant Impact. The designated congestion management agency for the San Diego region is SANDAL. In 2009, the San Diego region elected to be exempt from the state Congestion Management Plan and, since this decision, SANDAG has been abiding by 23 CFR 450.320 to ensure the region's continued compliance with the federal congestion management process. San Diego Forward: The Regional Plan (Regional Plan), the region's Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strategy, meets the requirements of 23 CFR 450.320 (SANDAG 2015). Therefore, to determine if the proposed project would conflict with an applicable congestion management program, the proposed project was reviewed for consistency with the Regional Plan, which is a land use and transportation planning document that discusses land use policy at a very general level. The Regional Plan mostly incorporates the land use policies of local jurisdictions and focuses on transportation infrastructure and management programs to support those policies. The project proposes changes to land use designations that could conflict with the Regional Plan. As such, further analysis will be included in the EIR. c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The closest air facilities to the project sites are NAS North Island, NOLF Imperial Beach, and San Diego International Airport, the closest of which is more than 5 miles from the project sites. In addition, the project sites are not within the Airport Influence Area of any airport as defined by an Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan or within the Airport Impact Zones for any of these airports (NOLF Imperial Beach ALUCP 2015, SDIA ALUCP 2014). Furthermore, the proposed project would not involve the development of any structure within the Airport Influence Area that would extend into airspace or be tall enough to result in a change in air traffic patterns or a change in location. Therefore, the project would not result in a change in air traffic patterns or otherwise result in a safety risk. There would be no impacts, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. d. Substantially increase hazards because of a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Potentially Significant Impact. The evaluation of potential increases in hazards because of a design feature typically involves determining if any project -related features would result in changes to the circulation system that could affect automobile traffic or pedestrians. Some examples include poor sight -distance at intersections, sharp roadway curves, and driveway/site access along a high-speed roadway. The proposed project would include two road closures (portions of Tidelands Avenue and West 28th Street), realignment of Marina Way, and the potential narrowing of Bay Marina Drive from its current four lanes to two, as well as a complete closure, to thru-traffic. As such, the creation of a road hazard will be analyzed in the EIR. e. Result in inadequate emergency access? Potentially Significant Impact. See response to VIII.g. The proposed project would involve closure of Tidelands Avenue between Bay Marina Drive and West 32nd Street, and West 28th Street National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 50 ICF 00152.17 461 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist between Tidelands Avenue and Quay Avenue, and the potential narrowing or closure (to thru- traffic) of Bay Marina Drive west of Marina Way. The EIR will further evaluate impacts associated with these potential closures. f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project includes the construction and operation of Segment 5 of the Bayshore Bikeway. In addition, the project would close and modify roads that currently provide access to the project area. Potential impacts relating to public transit, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities and the plans, performance, and safety of such facilities will be analyzed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 51 ICF 00152.17 462 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XVIL Tribal Cultural Resources Less -than - Potentially Significant Less -than - Significant with Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or an object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe and: a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k), or b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code Section 21074 as a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or an object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe and: a. Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a local register of historical resources, as defined in Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(k)? No Impact. A records search at the South Coastal Information Center was conducted for a District - wide study of cultural resources to determine if previously recorded tribal cultural resources are present within the project sites. No tribal cultural resources that are listed in or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources were identified during the records search. Additionally, a Sacred Lands File Search of the project area was obtained on April 27, 2017, from the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) as part of the District -wide cultural resources study. No Sacred Lands were identified by the NAHC. Because there are no Tribal Cultural Resources eligible for listing in the CRHR in the project area, there would be no impact. Further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. b. A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. Less -than -Significant Impact. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21080.3.1 (Assembly Bill [AB] 52), California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 52 ICF 00152.17 463 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist area can request notification of projects in their traditional cultural territory. The District has not received a request for AB 52 project notifications from any local Native American tribes. Additionally, the District has not received a specific AB 52 consultation request for the proposed project. Due to the developed nature of the project sites and the surrounding area, and the lack of requested notification by tribes, it is unlikely that significant tribal cultural resources would be encountered during construction of the proposed project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant, and further discussion in the EIR is not warranted. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 53 ICF 00152.17 464 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XVIL Utilities and Service Systems Less -than - Significant Potentially Impact with Less -than - Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Would the project: a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c. Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or would new or expanded entitlements be needed? e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? h. Result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy? a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project includes features such as the GB Capital Component and the City Program - Development Component that could further expand commercial uses in the area. These components would generate additional wastewater compared with existing conditions due to the increase in employees and visitors. Although it is not anticipated that the additional wastewater would exceed the requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board, this impact will be further discussed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 54 ICF 00152.17 465 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist b. Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed construction and operation of visitor -serving commercial uses, such as hotels would increase water and wastewater demand compared to existing conditions. Further discussion of the need for new or expanded water or wastewater infrastructure will be discussed in the EIR. c. Require or result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Potentially Significant Impact. The existing drainage patterns would not be substantially altered with the proposed project; no streams or rivers exist on site. The proposed project would develop some existing undeveloped parcels, which would increase the rate or amount of stormwater runoff from new impervious surface areas. This runoff would be managed by new stormwater facilities in compliance with the District's or City's JRMP and would discharge directly to the San Diego Bay. The proposed project would not result in a significant increase in stormwater runoff compared to existing conditions because the project sites are mostly developed or graded. However, it would increase impervious surfaces associated with development of some undeveloped parcels. Under the proposed project, the new land uses would increase the amount of impervious surface, which would increase stormwater runoff during construction and operations and may result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities. This issue area will be further discussed in the EIR. d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or would new or expanded entitlements be needed? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase water demand related to increased development associated with operation of up to five hotels, an RV park, modular cabins, expanded marina, restaurant, retail, and/or other combination of tourist/visitor-serving commercial development. The project's additional water demand estimate will be discussed and analyzed using the generation rates in the Sweetwater Authority's Urban Water Management Plan in the EIR. e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would generate additional wastewater related to the GB Capital Component and the City Program - Development Component as more employees and visitors will be utilizing wastewater services in the future. Further discussion of wastewater generation will be included in the EIR. f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? Potentially Significant Impact. Several solid waste landfills serve the disposal needs of the region. Construction activities would generate solid waste that would require disposal in local landfills. The amount and type of construction solid waste will be analyzed further in the EIR. During site preparation, concrete and other materials associated with construction activities would be exported off site to an approved facility for recycling and disposal. During operations, waste associated with National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 55 ICF 00152.17 466 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist g• the additional permanent employees and increased visitor use would be generated. Therefore, further discussion in the EIR is warranted. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Potentially Significant Impact. Diversion rates are used to report solid waste disposal in National City and to address AB 939 recycling goals, which require each city in the state to divert at least 50% of its solid waste from landfill disposal through measures such as source reduction, recycling, and composting. In October 2014 AB 1826 required all businesses to recycle their organic waste beginning in April 1, 2016, depending on the amount of waste they generate per week. This law also required local jurisdictions to implement an organic waste recycling program to divert organic waste generated by businesses. Organic waste means food waste, green waste, landscape and pruning waste, nonhazardous wood waste, and food -soiled paper waste that is mixed in with food waste. The phase -in of this mandate helps the state achieve its overall waste diversion (75% by 2020) and greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals. During operations, the proposed project would introduce new employees to the area. In addition to solid waste generated by the additional employees, the RV park, modular cabins, hotels, restaurant, retail, and/or other combination of tourist/visitor-serving commercial development, and the expansion of Pepper Park would generate solid waste from hotel guests, and recreational users, as well as general operational activities. The proposed project would be required to comply with applicable waste diversion requirements, and concrete and building materials associated with demolition of existing structures (e.g., asphalt associated with demolition of the existing alignment of Marina Way) would be exported and recycled at one of several approved facilities in San Diego County. Further discussion of solid waste generation will be included in the EIR. h. Result in the wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy? Potentially Significant Impact. The proposed project would increase energy use associated with the proposed increase in commercial uses in the project area. Operations would increase motor vehicle and boating fossil fuel combustion, electricity consumption, and natural gas consumption associated with retail, hotel, and marina uses. According to Appendix F, Energy Conservation, of the State CEQA Guidelines, a project has the potential to result in wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary consumption of energy when considering: • The project's energy requirements and its energy -use efficiencies by amount and fuel type for each stage of the project, including construction, operation, maintenance, and/or removal. • The effects of the project on local and regional energy supplies and requirements for additional capacity. • The effects of the project on peak- and base -period demands for electricity and other forms of energy. • The degree to which the project complies with existing energy standards. • The effects of the project on energy resources. Considering the proposed project's potential increase in energy demand, impacts associated with the consumption of energy are considered potentially significant and will be further analyzed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 56 ICF 00152.17 467 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist XVIII. Mandatory Findings of Significance a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c. Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact Less -than - Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated Less -than - Significant Impact No Impact El 0 El a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Significant Impact. Based on the biological survey (Dudek 2017), Parcel B6, which is part of the Balanced Plan and the GB Capital Component, has been previously graded and is mostly disturbed but supports a small amount of scattered special -status plant species. Further evaluation will be provided in the EIR. As part of the proposed project, in -water work is proposed to occur in the Bay, which would cause potential impacts on fish and marine mammal species. Because the site was not created until the mid -twentieth century using fill materials, the potential for any prehistoric resources to be affected is low. However, given the age of Granger Hall, which may potentially be relocated to Pepper Park as a project feature, the potential exists for impacts on historical buildings. As such, this issue will be further evaluated in the EIR. b. Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 57 ICF 00152.17 468 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District Initial Study/Environmental Checklist when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Potentially Significant Impact. State CEQA Guidelines Section 15130 requires a discussion of the cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is "cumulatively considerable," meaning that the project's incremental effects are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past, current, and probable future projects. The cumulative impacts discussion does not need to provide as much detail as is provided in the analysis of project -specific impacts and should be guided by the standards of practicality and reasonableness. As determined by this Initial Study, there may be potentially significant effects related to aesthetics, air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, GHG emissions, hazards/hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, land use and planning, noise, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities and service systems. Therefore, the project's potential contribution to cumulative impacts related to these resources will be discussed in the EIR. Given that the project would have no impact on aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, geologic hazards and soils, mineral resources, or tribal cultural resources, it was determined that the proposed project would have no potential to result in cumulative impacts related to these resource areas. Further discussion of the cumulative effect on these resources in the EIR is not warranted. c. Does the project have environmental effects that will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Significant Impact. Based on the analysis above, the proposed project has the potential to result in significant impacts on air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, GHG emissions, hazards/hazardous materials, hydrology/water quality, land use and planning, noise, population/housing, public services, recreation, transportation/traffic, and utilities and service systems. As such, the project has the potential to result in environmental impacts that could cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Therefore, this issue area will be discussed in the EIR. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 58 ICF 00152.17 469 of 473 References Aesthetics California Department of Transportation (DOT). 2018. List of Eligible and Officially Designated State Scenic Highways. Available: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16 livability/scenic highways/scenic hwy.htm. Accessed: August 8, 2018. San Diego Unified Port District (District). 2015. Port Master Plan. July. Available: https://www.portofsandiego.org/environment/land-use/port-master-plan.html. Accessed: August 7, 2018. Agricultural Resources California Department of Conservation (DOC). 2013. San Diego County Williamson Act 2013/2014. Available: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/lca. Accessed: August 8, 2018. ---. 2018. California Important Farmland Finder. Available: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/dlrp/ciff/. Accessed: August 8, 2018. Air Quality California Air Resources Board (ARB). 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Available: http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/landuse.htm. Accessed: August 8, 2018. Biological Resources Dudek. 2017. Biological Survey and Wetland Delineation ofArea West of Paradise Marsh, National City, California. February 10. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. 2006. San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge, Sweetwater Marsh and South San Diego Bay Units, Final Comprehensive Conservation Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Summary, August 2006. Available: https://www.fws.gov/uploadedFiles/Region_8/NWRS/Zone_1/San_Diego_Complex/San_Diego_ Bay/Sections/What We_Do/Conservation/PDFs/CCP_Summary.pdf. Accessed: December 11, 2017. Cultural Resources Alden, J. 1857. Map of San Diego Bay, California. 1:40,000 scale. Survey of the Coast of the United States City of San Diego. 2007. Paleontological Resources. Draft General Plan. Final PEIR. County of San Diego. 2009. Guidelines for Determining Significance. Paleontological Resources. Land Use and Environmental Group. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments Initial Study 59 December 2018 ICF 00152.17 470 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District References National Environmental Title Research (NETR). 2017. Historic Aerial Photographs. Photographs of Project Area from the 1950s through 2012. Available: https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer. Accessed May (multiple dates) 2017. U.S. Geological Survey. 1904. San Diego, California, 7.5-minute Quadrangle Map. Surveyed 1902. Geology and Soils California Department of Conservation. 2010. California Geological Survey; Fault Activity Map of California (2010). Available: http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/fam/. Accessed: August 13, 2018. California Building Standards Commission. 2016.2016 California Building Code. Available: http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Codes.aspx. Accessed: August 8, 2018. California Seismic Safety Commission. 2005. Homeowner's Guide to Earthquake Safety. Last revised: July 1, 2005. Available: http://www.seismic.ca.gov/pub/CSSC 2005-01 HOG.pdf. Accessed: December 11, 2017. City of National City. 2018. Municipal Code Title 15 Chapter 15.70 - Grading. Available: https://library.municode.com/ca/national city/codes/code of ordinances?nodeld=CD ORD TI T15BUCO CH15.70GR. Accessed: August 13, 2018. ---. 2018. Best Management Practice (BMP) Design Manual. Available: https://nationalcityca.gov/home/showdocument?id=. Accessed: December 12, 2018. San Diego Geographic Information. 2018. Regional Data Downloads; "Fault Alqpri". Available: http://www.sangis.org/. Accessed: August 13, 2018. San Diego Unified Port District (District). 2016. Port BMP Design Manual. February. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2018. Web Soil Survey. Available: https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm. Accessed: August 13, 2018. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 1973. Soil Survey, San Diego Area, California. December. Hazards and Hazardous Materials California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 2009. San Diego County FHSZ Map. Last revised: 2012. Available: http://www.fire.ca.gov/fire_prevention/fhsz_maps_sandiego.php. Accessed: November 20, 2017. California Department of Toxic Substances Control. 2018. EnviroStor database. Available: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/. Accessed: August 8, 2018. Unified Port District of San Diego (District). 2016. National City Marine Terminal Tank Farm Paving and Street Closures Project & Port Master Plan Amendment Final EIR UPD #EIR-2014-188; SCH#2014121046. State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). 2018. GeoTracker database. Available: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/. Accessed: August 8, 2018. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 60 ICF 00152.17 471 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District References Hydrology and Water Quality California Department of Conservation. 2009. Tsunami Inundation Map: National City Quadrangle. Available: http://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/geologic hazards/Tsunami/inundation Maps/SanDiego/ Documents/Tsunami Inundation NationalCity Quad SanDiego.pdf. Accessed: August 8, 2018. California Natural Resources Agency (NRA). 2017. Dams Within Jurisdiction of the State of California. Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams. September 2017. City of National City. 2012a. General Plan. Adopted June 7, 2011. Readopted January 24, 2012. City of National City. 2012b. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update EIR. Chapter 4.8, Hydrology and Water Quality. Available: http://www.ci.national- city.ca.us/Modules/ShowDocument.aspx?documentid=4451. Accessed: November 22, 2017. City of San Diego. 2007. General Plan Update - Final Program EIR. http://www.sandiego.gov/planning/genplan/documents/peir.shtml. Accessed November 22, 2017. County of San Diego. 2010. Multi jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan. http://www.sandiegocounty.gov/content/dam/sdc/oes/docs/2010-HazMit-Final-August- 2010.pdf. Accessed: November 22, 2017. ---. 2011. San Diego County General Plan Update EIR. Chapter 2.8, Hydrology and Water Quality. http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/pds/gpupdate/docs/BOS Aug2011/EIR/FEIR 2.08 - Hydrology 2011.pdf. Accessed: November 20, 2017. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2014. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), San Diego County, California, Map Item ID 06073C1913G. Available: www.msc.fema.gov. Accessed: April 14, 2014. Mineral Resources California Geological Survey (CGS). 2017. Mineral Land Classification Map, National City, California, Special Report 153, Plate 26, California Geological Survey, Information Warehouse. Available: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/sr/SR_153/SR-153_Plate-26.pdf. Accessed: December 11, 2017. City of San Diego. 2008. City of San Diego General Plan, Conservation Element. March 2008. Noise City of San Diego. 2015. City of San Diego General Plan, Noise Element. June 2015. Transportation and Traffic Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. 2014. San Diego International Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Amended May 1, 2014. Available: http://www.san.org/Portals/0/Documents/Land%20Use%20Compatibility/SDIA/SDIA%20ALUCP %20Ch%201-6%20(May%202014).pdf. Accessed: August 13, 2018. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 61 ICF 00152.17 472 of 473 San Diego Unified Port District References ---. 2015. Naval Outlying Landing Field Imperial Beach Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. Adopted October 15, 2015. Available: http://www.san.org/Portals/0/Documents/Land%20Use%20Compatibility/NOLF IB ALUCP FINA L Compiled Oct%202015.pdf. Accessed: August 13, 2018. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). 2015. San Diego Forward; The Regional Plan. October 2015. Available: http://sdforward.com/pdfs/Final PDFs/The Plan combined.pdf. Accessed: August 13, 2018. Mandatory Findings of Significance Dudek. 2017. Biological Survey and Wetland Delineation of Area West of Paradise Marsh, National City, California. February 10. National City Bayfront Projects and Plan Amendments December 2018 Initial Study 62 ICF 00152.17 473 of 473