HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998 07-14 CC AGENDA PKTAGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING
NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CIVIC CENTER
1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY - JULY 14, 1998 - 6:00 P.M.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO
THE CITY CLERK
IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR
CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY
MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO
KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY CITY MANAGER, TOM G. MCCABE.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16, 1998.
COUNCIL AGENDA
7/14/98 Page 2
INTERVIEWS/APPOINTMENTS
Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Advisory Board - Appointments
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing — Proposed Specific Plan Amendment for a commercial center
on the north side of 8th Street, between "N" Avenue and Palm Avenue.
Applicant: Harry Guterman, Leader Development, Richard Binkert, Noel
Development. Case File Nos.: M1-SP-1993-1. (Planning)
2. Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance amending the National City Municipal
Code by amending Title 6 by repealing Chapter 6.38 regarding "Taxis -
Vehicles for Hire" and amending Title 11 by adding Chapter 11.70 regulating
Paratransit Vehicles through adoption of San Diego Metropolitan Transit
Development Board (MTDB) Codified Ordinance No. 11. *"See Item #19**
(City Attorney)
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters which are of a routine or
noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a
single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed
from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a
Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public.
3. Resolution No. 98-73
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City selecting annual
adjustment factors for use in establishing the Annual Appropriations Limit for
Fiscal Year 1998-99. (Finance)
4. Resolution No. 98-74
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City establishing the
Annual Appropriations Limit for Fiscal Year 1998-99. (Finance)
COUNCIL AGENDA
7/14/98 Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
5. Resolution No. 98-75
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor
to execute Agreements with the HdL Companies for sales tax services and
property tax services. (Finance)
6. Resolution No. 98-76
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City calling and giving
notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday,
November 3, 1998 for the election of certain officers as required by the
provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities.
(City Clerk)
7. Resolution No. 98-77
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City requesting the Board
of Supervisors of the County of San Diego to consolidate a General Municipal
Election to be held on November 3, 1998, with the statewide general election to
be held on that date pursuant to Section 10403 of the Elections Code. (City
Clerk)
8. Resolution No. 98-78
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor
to execute a Special Contract Party Agreement and accompanying
Memorandum of Understanding with the Regional Solid Waste Association.
(Public Works)
9. Resolution No. 98-79
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Chief
of Police to submit a Suppression of Drug Abuse in Schools Program proposal
to the Office of Criminal Justice Planning and to execute a Grant Agreement
and all related operational agreements and grant documents. (Police)
COUNCIL AGENDA
7/14/98 Page 4
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
10. Resolution No. 98-80
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City
Manager to submit the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Application to the
U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance and to sign the Grant
Award Agreement and all grant related documents. (Police)
11. Resolution No. 98-81
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting the work
and authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion for traffic signal
installation. (Engineering Specification No. 95-8.) (Engineering)
12. Resolution No. 98-82
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor
to execute an application for funds from the San Diego Unified Port District for a
musical program to be held in Pepper Park. (Parks & Recreation)
13. Street Tree Committee Minutes. (Parks & Recreation)
14. WARRANT REGISTER #49 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $861,132.28.
15. WARRANT REGISTER #50 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $212,546.53.
Certification of Payroll in the amount of $476,562.61.
COUNCIL AGENDA
7/14/98 Page 5
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
16. WARRANT REGISTER #51 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $1,128,754.46.
17. WARRANT REGISTER #1 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $383,832.70.
Certification of Payroll in the amount of $518,496.32.
ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION
18. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending Title 10
of the National City Municipal Code by amending Chapter 10.45 regarding
security and fire alarm systems. (City Attorney)
ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
19. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending the
National City Municipal Code by repealing Chapter 6.38 regarding 'Taxis -
Vehicles for Hire" and amending Title 11 by adding Chapter 11.70 regulating
Paratransit Vehicles through adoption of San Diego Metropolitan Transit
Development Board (MTDB) Codified Ordinance No. 11. '"`See Public
Hearing- Item No. 2** (City Attorney)
URGENCY ORDINANCE
20. An urgency Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending
Section 11.16.010 (Speed Zones Designated) of the National City Municipal
Code establishing Speed Zones on various streets. (Engineering)
COUNCIL AGENDA
7/14/98 Page 6
OLD BUSINESS
21. Sewer Service Charges. (City Attorney)
NEW BUSINESS
22. Use of Community Building by the National City Chamber of Commerce and the
Kiwanis Club for the Salute to the Navy Birthday luncheon on October 14, 1998
and waiver of fees. (Public Works)
—> CITY MANAGER
-* CITY ATTORNEY
—* OTHER STAFF
- MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit)
NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back
on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or
urgent nature.
COUNCIL AGENDA
7/14/98 Page 7
NEW BUSINESS (Cont.)
CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISITING LITIGATION -
Government Code Section 54956.9(a). City of National City, Community
Development Commission of the City of National City v. State Water Resources
Control Board. et al.
ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular City Council Meeting — July 21, 1998 — 3:00 p.m. - Council
Chambers, Civic Center.
TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO
IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Office of the Mayor
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4230
George H. Waters - Mayor
DATE: July 2, 1998
TO: City Council
FROM: Mayor George H. Waters
SUJBECT: APPOINTMENTS TO FILL VACANCIES ON LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT ADVISORY BOARD
Due to the advancement of Stephen Thunberg and Joan Stein they are
resigning from the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Advisory Board.
I recommend the appointment of Dave Greenberg to fill the District Attorney's
office representative position on the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
Advisory Board vacated by Joan Stein. I am also requesting that Sandra Downs
be appointed to fill the local court representative position on the Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant Advisory Board that was vacated by Stephen
Thunberg.
If there are no objections this will be placed on the July 14, 1998, regular City
Council meeting at 6:00 p.m.
---- --
George H. Waters
Mayor
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE
July 14. 1998
AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
/ ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT FOR A COMMERCIAL CENTER
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 8TH STREET, BETWEEN N AVENUE AND PALM AVENUE. APPLICANT: HARRY
GUTERIVIAN, LEADER DEVELOPMENT, RICHARD BINKERT, NOEL DEVELOPMENT CASE FILE NOS.: MI-SP-
1993-1
PREPARED BY �. ✓' DEPARTMENT Planning_
Phelps
EXPLANATION jr
The City Council approved in 1993 a specific plan for a 15,530 sq. ft. shopping center on the
north side of 8th Street, between "N" and Palm Avenue. The applicants recently requested a series of
amendments to the approved plan. The Planning Commission took action on this last month, as
explained in the attached report.
The City Council has the option of approving or denying the proposal, based on specific
findings, attached.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Proposed Negative Declaration
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with the Planning Commission's decision. "
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Planning Commission voted to recommena approval of the Specific Plan Amendment.
Vote: Ayes - unanimous
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below )
I. Background report 4. Recommended conditions
3. Location map 5. P. C. Resolution
3. Recommended findings 6. Applicant's letter
Resolution No.
7. Initial Study
8. Application
9. Proposed plans
BACKGROUND REPORT
A Specific Plan was required for the development of this commercial shopping center.
known as `'Palm Plaza." in compliance with a City Council adopted resolution (92-152), on
August 11. 1992. This was to ensure that the development would be built in a coordinated
fashion, based on consideration for common access, compatible architecture, and slope
constraints. The property includes 6 parcels which otherwise could be developed separately.
The Specific Plan was approved August 10. 1993. It called for a commercial center with
four buildings with a total floor area of 15.530 square feet. The development concept approved
with the specific plan achieved the goals established in the 1992 Council resolution. One of the
amenities the project would provide was that a 10 ft. setback and a 5 ft. right-of-way would be
landscaped for a total of 15 ft. of landscaping to run along the entire length of the commercial
center. The project was also required to be built concurrently so all public improvements, grading
and retaining walls would be installed at the same time. A total of 70 parking spaces was
allowed with shared access, truck loading facilities. and trash enclosures. This involved the
following exceptions to Land Use Code standards: (1) 8 less parking spaces than required by
shopping center standards. (2) 3 additional compact spaces beyond the 25% allowed (20 vs. 17);
and (3) a 24 ft. driveway aisle instead of 27 ft.
A Request to Initiate a Specific Plan Amendment was approved by the Planning
Commission in November. 1997. The applicant requested changes to the site plan and some
conditions of approval. Basically, the applicant wished to move the commercial buildings
forward, and reduce the landscape setback area and make minor changes in the parking layout.
He also wanted to avoid building the entire project at one time. In December, 1997, the applicant
officially applied for the Specific Plan Amendment. Public hearings were held in April. May.
and June. 1998.
On June 15. 1998. the Planning Commission approved a resolution to recommend the
Specific Plan Amendment. This will allow: (1) the commercial buildings to be moved forward
10 to 20 ft. away from the adjacent hillside. (2) the project to be built in two phases. and (3) a
modification of the Code standard for landscaping. Specifically. the plan eliminates the Code
required 10 ft. landscape setback in front of the buildings. In lieu of the required landscape
setback. three 8' x 8' landscape planter boxes are proposed.
Recommended conditions of approval reflect revisions to the site plan. In evaluating the
revised site plan. it was noted that a portion of an unstable stone wall on and near the north
property line had collapsed during the winter stoups. Since a portion of this wall is located on
the project property. Condition No. 1 requires any portion located within the project boundary be
removed by the applicant and rebuilt in accordance with City standards. Any portion of the wall
outside of the project boundary must be analyzed for safety purposes. as part of the construction
of the project.
The applicant has suggested the possibility of deedina the property in question to the
various property owners north of the project site to avoid repiacine the unstable stone vwall. A
Certificate of Compliance would need to be approved by the Planning Commission as rart of any
change in property boundaries.
PROPOSED BUILDINGS millmiami ZONE BOUNC.
—I — MUM II MN
— II
a
•
b
a
f
— I IMO
(0
(�
H
/J/.
/101
1102
M170,{__
• 1IT 7 I L.7 .W 1310
1110
■— —NT' AVENUE
.•c
b
b
is
/446
au
f
I,
r1AP rs
b I b
♦
CI
1. 40
ffllffflr11—1 fiI
/ 41'
1428
1412
1438 :
amok 7 — ■.fife r_ s
I /S01 6
in
rT,
'♦ •
40.4
16 1/
/611
160.2
16,15 16/I
H /6
m.16
It)
7
• 60
_ll
1716 1
• I /540
r
.. .. - - u. I .-tlw ..
I� b A
1 Y/
/60/
• 1609 , O 16/0
/6
I
/n 1I1 11 1 /6/1
/61.
16111 11 f
1 R. 11
i.inP—
A w a
q 3
p
/rJ/ b
0
AVENUE11.1.1.111M1f1._
1+a
11 n_
a' :• /417 •
/420 i V q
/423
l426
11 _
1304
/310
(I)
•J
a
lr m •
/.1// IT. - ' _ /.Lr
—
J _15
.ly
'(1/7J0
^' /338 6
^407 /JI4
•
NJ/ j
11
11
/44/
/445
•
It
a
le
/J48
IMP e
1.4.00 6
/4/0
/410
o
to
II -
V 1
1501
--1,
to
L1•‘I
. /3/7 y
/401
nt_
• /407
/41/
b4I
/42/
/41/
._emu
a -
iC
1.
•
'
IN■—f MN I— f — I NMI f t I— I fflfl I— 1—I
III
0 e
14
III
n
to
41
h
11
111
U
a
/6 H0
RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
OF SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT:
1. Find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and adopt the
proposed negative declaration.
2. That the proposed project is consistent with the Limited Commercial General Plan
designation which provides for small scale. limited convenience retail shopping
facilities at the neighborhood level.
3. That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape.
topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of Title 18 of the Municipal
Code (Zoning) deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the
vicinity and under the identical zone classification, since the area of developable land is
limited by the change in elevation from the street to the properties to the rear by the
slope which measures approximately twenty feet in height.
RECOMMENDED CITY CODICIL FINDINGS FOR DENIAL
OF SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT:
1. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is not consistent with the intent of the
existing Specific Plan in that the removal of the requirement for all site improvements
to be constructed concurrently will result in piecemeal. uncoordinated development.
2. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is not consistent with the intent of the
existing Specific Plan since there will be inadequate area for landscaping along 8th
Street to provide visual relief for the strip commercial shopping center.
3. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is not consistent with the intent of the
existing Specific Plan since the increase in building area will result in a greater
deficiency in on -site parking from what the Land Use Code requires.
4. That there are no special circumstances applicable to the property such that the strict
application of Title 18 of the Municipal Code (Zoning) deprives such property of
privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zone
classification. since the amount of building floor area could be reduced in order to
accommodate the required landscape setback.
5. That the proposed Specific Plan Amendment is nor consistent with General Plan
policies w:;c'.1 encourage alternatives to small shopping center developments.
RECOMMENDED CITY COUNCIL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT:
1. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted which .will show a.- of the
proposed and existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan s _ll be
prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Re_s-ered
Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of stoma water 7:11cation.
and hazardous material run-off to public storm drain system from the n-onosed
parking lot shall be implemented with the design of the grading plan. This s shall
include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors. clarifiers. or
filters. Best Management practices for the maintenance of the mar_ tng lot.
including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins ans.' storm
drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the NPDES regulations. Checklist
for preparation of the grading and drainage plan is available at the Engineering
Department. The grading plan must include provisions for prevention of
construction site erosion and sediment run-off into the public right-of-way . u:Mg
the grading operations. Other items to be shown on :he plan are:
• The location, type and profile of the retaining wail/crib wail. and __e wall
drainage system.
• Procedures to be utilized for temporary cuts into the slope d_--_
construction. Specifically, provide representative cross -sections
retaining wall construction. and identify potential vroblems. __ _
into the adjacent property.
• The existing stone wall along the northersy property line. the
treatment, and how the run-off channeled through :he w-eenhoies in
wall will be conveyed. Any impact on this wail due to the nrojec: is _o be
considered and analyzed, using current standards. including meth: :or
wall protection. or retrofitting, if necessary. This requirement shall airpi
only if the stone wall is located outside of the project boundary (no:
this property). If the wall is inside of the Palm Plea propery. a
completely demolished, and a new standard retaining wall cen_-r-_c:ed
with complete details shown on the grading plan. including and
sections. Any related structural calculations shall also be submitted
office for review.
?. A drainage study shall be submitted.
g
coolie
3. All surface run-off. including landscaping adiointr. .`=� n_^_-o_- _.
be collected by approved drainage facilities_ and to :he
outlets. No spraying or run-off of irrigation water over :he public _
be allowed.
4. A current soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering
Department's review. The report shall address the stability of the existing slopes
on the property, including the stability study of the hillside and protection of the
buildings and structures on top of the slopes. This includes analysis of the
existing stone wall along the northerly property line. It shall also address the
adequacy of the building pads. the criteria for the proposed block/crib wall design.
the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement
structural sections for the proposed parking areas, and the driveways. The street
pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City Standard Drawing
113-SB as a minimum.
5. A sewer permit and payment of sewer fees will be required. The method of
sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading plan. The new
sewer laterals in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in diameter with clean -outs.
A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of each
lateral. Each building is to be separately and independently connected to sewer.
The developers shall install their own laterals and resurface the trenches on 8th
Street.
6. The existing street improvements along. the property frontage shall be kept free
from weed growth by the use of special weed killers, or other approved methods.
7. The driveways on 8th Street shall be alley entrance type driveways with
pedestrian ramps. A 10 ft. radius for the driveway returns will be acceptable.
Construct additional sidewalk to accommodate the pedestrian ramps (type "D").
Show the driveway spacing and locations (centerline station. or distance to
property line) on all plans. The curbside parking between the two easterly
driveways shall be eliminated by creation of a new red zone. The westerly
driveway (with the pedestrian ramp on each side) will interfere with the existing -
fire hydrant. Therefore, relocate this hydrant away from the pedestrian ramp.
Provide additional sidewalk behind the hydrant for pedestrians. The grading plan
shall show driveway profiles and grades. Driveway widths and locations shall
comply with the Regional Standard Drawings.
8. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement
work within the Public right-of-way, and construction grading on private
property.
9. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to
the approved cost estimate for ail of the proposed grading_ drainage. street
improvement. landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent
of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for
plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The
deposit may be subject to adjustment.
10. A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review
existing easements and ownerships of properties.
11. The developers shall record a boundary adjustment for the relocation of
lines conflicting with the proposed building "A," or apply for a lot merger
to consolidate the three westerly parcels into one lot.
12. A reciprocal drainage agreement will be necessary. based on lot line ad;ust_mems.
and the merging of parcels needed to revise lot configurations for develop-e-:
properties.
13. The revised traffic impact analysis was reviewed by the Engineering Department.
The recommendations contained in the study, such as provision for a two -watt le=
turn lane on 8th Street. and the prohibition of parking on the north side of 8th
Street shall be incorporated on plans and implemented. A separate striping pi`_
for the re -striping of 8th Street will be required. The proposed on -site di-i a z. a:
between the properties shall remain 18 ft. wide.
14. Based on the recommendations of the project traffic engineer, the three parry-__
spaces next to the westerly driveway shall be designated as low turnover pa_
such as a service vehicle area. delivery zone, or employee parking, in order
minimize potential conflicts with on -coming traffic from 8th Street. As
remainder of the parking stalls adjacent to the proposed driveways, the -=emir-
medians are to be designed and landscaped such that the existing e-:.._e_
maintain a clear view of the ingress traffic.
15. A complete up-to-date set of cribwall/retaining wall calculations. using :he desi
criteria of the soils report shall be submitted to the Engineering Depart e
review and approval. The design of the cribwall must account for su._
exerted by the structures located adjacent to the top of the slope. if close
property line.
16. The reconstructed slope shall be planted with approved landscaping to --_ :e
against post construction erosion. But. planting the existing slopes alone
considerations for stability and protection does not address the engine_-
concerns and is not acceptabie.
17. A new street light. owned and maintained by SDG E. shall be installed
Street at mid -point along the length of the project site.
18. Existing power poles may have to he relocated. if in cJ'' 'c: with the
landscaping. but there shall be no conflict with the prcposed dr'.e'.va::_
plans must show all roles with the driveways.
19. Minor sidewalk grinding, and curb and ,utter removal will be required on 8th
Street (approximately 50 feet).
20. Plans submitted for building petinits must comply with the 1994 Unifotin
Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code. and Uniform Plumbing Code; the
1993 National Electrical Code; and the State Title 24 handicapped and energy
regulations.
21. Engineering calculations and soils reports shall be submitted in conjunction with
any new building construction plans.
22. A completely dimensioned floor plan shall be provided for each building.
23. The plans shall specify the criteria which justify exceeding allowable area as per
Table SC, U.B.C. 1994.
24. The plans shall show occupancy and building type as per Table 5A. U.B.C.
25. Leasing space in excess of 1,485 square feet to a single tenant will require the
provision of two exits.
26. Interior roof drain piping and interior over -flow drain piping shall be provided to
convey water from the roofs of the buildings to the ground.
27. Provide 1.6 gallon water closets. or flush-o-meter valves. and 1 gallon urinals. or
flush -meter valves, per Section 17921.3(b) of the State Health and Safety Code.
28. Glazing subject to human impact shall comply with Uniform Building Code
Section 5406.
29. Parapet and building height shall be indicated on the plans.
30. Plans submitted for building permits must comply with the 1994 Uniform Fire
Code.
31. The required fire flow will be 2250 GPM for 2 hours at a minimum 20 PSI
residual. Sweetwater Authority must verify in writing that this flow requirement
can be met. It shall be the owner's responsibility to obtain this written verification.
If improvements are necessary to obtain the required pressure. it shall be the
property owner's responsibility to enter into an agreement with the Sweetwater
Authority to provide the required improvements.
32. Fire lanes shall be provided as required by the Fire Department.
33. The address of each building (and any suite numbers) shall be clearly visible and
on a contrasting background.
34. Fire extinguishers (minimum Type 2A: 1 OBC) shall be provided for each tenant.
35. Due to the lack of access on the northerly side of the buildings. it
necessary to provide additional fire protection measures. The developer shall
provide such protection as deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal.
36. Pursuant to California Government Code 53080, full mitigation is required prior
to the issuance of a building permit on new structures within the District for the
purpose of funding construction of school facilities.
37. Agreements or easements shall be recorded prior to development permit an :oval
where access across parcels is proposed, for access to trash enclosures and mock
loading facilities.
38. The parking area for Leader Development properties (APN's. 557-102-03.
shall be installed prior to the occupancy of any building on those parce_s.:he
parking area for Noel Development properties (APN's. 5 7-102 7. OS . s=a_l be
installed prior to occupancy of any building on those properties.
39. The owner of Noel Development properties (APN's. 57-102-07. C8 ! shall
an easement for the right of access for the Hutchins properly. or the fur.:_
of APN. 557-102-10.
40. Vehicle circulation shall be provided between the parking areas Thad__
Development properties (APN's. 557-102-03, 21, 23) and the parkin_
Noel Development properties (APN's. 557-102-07. 08). The drive. a_: ___ ___
shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director.
41. The three parking stalls immediately adjacent to the westerly driveway 3th
Street shall be reserved for employee parking. only. The two interim parkins is
immediatelly adjacent to the easterly driveway to 8th Street shall loe res_r-. __
employee parking only. All parking stalls shall be marked subject :o ah_r_-.-
the Planning Director and City Engineer.
42. A reciprocal parking agreement shall be recorded for those portions
Specific Plan area for which there is a common driveway and par -et
43. The parkin_ lot shall be striped with hairpin lines. four to six inches in
lines shall form a band around each side of the stall measuring sixteen to- .
four inches in width. Parkin_ stalls designated solely for use by ernr !•c_ e__
be striped with single lire mar'.kines. Such stalls shall be clear -_:.
employee parking oak.
44. The developer shall notify the local utilities (gas. electric, cable television. water,
etc.) a minimum of 48 hours prior to filling of any trenching on the premises.
45. The trash enclosures shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Title 7
of the National City Municipal Code. The exterior walls of the enclosures shall be
stuccoed to match the building. The trash enclosures shall be screened from view
by the residents to the north of the property, and subject to the approval of the
Planning Director.
46. Exterior walls of buildings, freestanding signs, and trash enclosure to a height of
not less than 6 feet shall be treated with `Graffiti Melt Coating" manufactured by
Genesis Coatings, Inc. A similar product may be used, subject to approval from
the Building and Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its
observance.
47. All mechanical equipment, including any roof -mounted equipment, shall be
screened in accordance with National City's Design Guidelines. Such screening
shall be architecturally integrated with the building in terms of materials, color.
shape and size and shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director.
48. Signs and advertising shall be limited to three monument signs placed along 8th
Street. The name of the center or primary tenant may be placed thereon. Placards
identifying the tenants of the center may be placed on the sign as well. The sign
may be internally illuminated or may have ground -mounted illumination. The
sign shall be designed to reflect the architecture of the center and shall be subject
to Planning Director approval. The height of the sign may not exceed twelve feet
form the lowest point, including the foundation. Tenant identification signs shall
be limited to one sign per tenant and shall consist of individual channel letters not
exceeding eighteen inches in height. Such signs may include a cabinet sign in
which the tenants registered trademark is placed. Any such cabinet may not
exceed eighteen inches in height. The signs shall be placed on the stucco canopy,
or along the building face below the roof -line. The tenants of the end suites may
have a sign of the same configuration. not exceeding twenty-five square feet in
area on the end elevations. There shall be no roof -mounted advertising.
49. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan. including plant types.
methods of planting. etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the
Planning Director. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant
planting and water conserving irrigation devices. The landscaping proposed for
the slopes behind the buildings will have to be of a type and quantity that will
adequately protect the stability of the hillside. The planting specified must protect
against post -construction erosion on the reconstructed slope.
50. Before the Specific Plan Amendment shall become effective. the developers
(Leader Corporation and Noel Corporation) shall separately sign for their
respective parcels and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by :He
Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon
the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance
Form within 45 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Specific Plan
Amendment. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the
Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded -.zit:_
the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the
County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions
imposed by approval of Specific Plan Amendment are binding on all present Cr
future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction
shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning
Director prior to recordation.
51. If the project is built in the two proposed phases, the required interior driveway
between the properties may be used to provide two temporary parking spaces for
phase one (building A). The two interim parking spaces will be removed upon the
commencement of construction for phase two (buildings B and C).
52. Except as required by conditions of approval. development plans shall be submitted
for review and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit-2A.
Case File No. M1-SP-1993-1, dated 7/9/98.
RESOLUTION 6-98
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA.
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT
FOR A COMMERCIAL CENTER ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 3TH STREET.
BETWEEN N AVENUE AND PALM AVENUE
APPLICANT: HARRY GUTER'VIAN. LEADER DEVELOPMENT
RICHARD BI VKERT, NOEL DEVELOPMENT
CASE FILE NO. Ml-SP-1993-1
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of National City at its meeting of August 11.
1992 adopted Resolution No. 92-152 directing according to California Government Code Section
65450 (et. seq.) that a specific plan be prepared for certain real properties in the area on the north
side of 8th Street, between N Avenue and Palm Avenue; and
WHEREAS, application was made and approved for Specific Plan SP-1993-1 for certain
real properties in the area on the north side of 8th Street, between N Avenue and Palm Avenue;
in accordance with above said Council direction; and
WHEREAS. proceedings were initiated for the amendment of the specific plan in
accordance with procedures of the Land Use Code; and
WHEREAS. the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Specific
Plan Amendment application for a commercial center on the north side of 8th Street between N
Avenue and Palm Avenue at the duly advertised public hearing on April 6. 1998. and continued
to the meetings of May -t, May 13 and June 1. 1998_ at which time oral and documentary
evidence was presented: and.
WHEREAS. at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the staff report
contained in Case File No. MI-SP-1993-1. which is maintained by the City and incorporated
herein by reference. along with evidence and testimony at said hearings and.
WHEREAS. this action is taken pursuant to all appiicabie procedures required by State
law and City law: and.
WHEREAS. the Planning Commission recognizes the need and desirability to provide
specific guidance for implementation of the General Plan by adoption of a specific plan in
compliance `.%;tit the Genera. Plan for the area on the north side of 8th Street. between N Avenue
and Paint and
\� ..�.�._..�. .1...:o1. .ecite'd 11..7C... is tdund to for the o1
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of :he
National City. . California. that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Co— ssic•ii
at the public hearing held on April 6. 1998. and continued to the meetings of May 4. May 18 and
June 1. 1998. support the following findings:
0
That the proposed project is consistent with the Limited Commercial General Plan
designation which provides for small scale_ limited convenience retail shopping facilities a:
the neighborhood level.
That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size. shade.
topography, location or surroundings. the strict application of Title 18 of the Municipal
Code (Zoning) deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the icinia
and under the identical zone classification, since the area of developable land is limited by
the change in elevation from the street to the properties to the rear by the slope e which
measures -approximately twenty feet in height.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has considered
proposed Negative Declaration No. IS-1997-12 together with any comments received during
public review process, and finds on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received :hat
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment
and that a Negative Declaration should be adopted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommends that the C_..
Council approve the application for a Specific Plan Amendment subject to the following
conditions:
1. A grailing and drainage plan shall be submitted which %.%ill show all of :he proposed and
existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance
with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All----cc--
meas'ures for prevention of storm water pollution. and hazardous material i.:n-or: to
public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot shall be implemented with :lie
design of the grading plan. This shall include the provision of such devices as stor
drain interceptors. clarifiers. or filters. Best Management practices for he maintenance of
the parking lot. including sampling. monitoring. and cleaning of private catch 'basins aid
storm drains. shall be undenaken in accordance with the NPDES regulations. Check:a
for ration of the Trading and drainage clan is available a: :lie Ea
Denanmen:. The grading plan must include provisions :or orei..ention of construc::on _--
eroston sediment run-off into :he public . -.t-o*-':-C poking
Osier :o be sno'Vn en the plan are:
• beat:on. t. r_e and prom_ o:
s•. ;tcm.
• du:c to Jul::.: r�.
\1 cr,)ss-.c.
cc :=-rac^on. and identify potential problems. if encroaching into the adjacent
prcprty.
• The existing stone wall along the northerly property line. the slope treatment. and
hov: the run-off channeled through the weepholes in the wall will be conve:`ed.
An.:: impact on this wail due to the project is to be considered and analyzed. using
current standards. including methods for wail protection. or retrofitting, if
necessary. This requirement shall apply only if the stone wall is located outside
of :He project boundary (not within this property). If the wall is inside of the Paim
Plaza property, it shall be completely demolished, and a new standard retaining
wail constructed with complete details shown on the grading plan. including
elevations. and sections. Any related structural calculations shall also be
submitted to this office for review.
2. A drainage study shall be submitted.
3. All surface run-off. including landscaping adjoining the public right-of-way. shall be
collected by approved drainage facilities. and directed to the street by curb outlets. No
spraying or run-off of irrigation water over the public sidewalk will be allowed.
4. A current soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's
review. The report shall address the stability of the existing slopes on the property.
including :he stability study of the hillside and protection of the buildings and structures
on top of the slopes. This includes analysis of the existing stone wall along the northerly
property line. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads. the criteria for the
proposed c: ck crib wail design. the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the
required pavement structural sections for the proposed parking areas. and the driveways.
The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City Standard Drawing
113-SB as a minimum.
5. A sewer nemait and payment of sewer fees will be required. The method of sewage
collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading plan. The new sewer laterals in the
City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in diameter with clean -outs. A sewer stamp "S" shall be
provided on the curb to mark the location of each lateral. Each building is to be
separately and inecendently connected to sewer. The developers shall install :heir own
laterals and resurface the trenches on Sth Street.
6. The exist_n_ street improvements along the property frontage shall be kart e from
weed _ro`. -n by tloe use of special weed killers. or other approved methods.
The drive..... _ nth Street shad be alley ernranoa tyre ur:ve`.yays
ramps. thr :he .:r:ve`.Aay returns will be ac. _
�blle. Construe: :.._..ai
side....i.k :: ... �.1:..c tll,. re'....sir:aa ramrs I "D'h SI:cw :he
and iccat::_ _ ���:._.. _taCon, or stance to aronal: ^Ia; -
:r: . 2 nr .o .....re. i .e`.y ay, .:ral. `C y ...e...:o.'.
.=o!.e. .,`.\: \y'i... 'deity.....
the existing rue hydrant. Therefore. relocate this hydrant away from the ice e :flan ramp.
Provide additional sidewalk behind the hydrant for pedestrians. The efadn _ plan shall
show driveway profiles and grades. Drivew.vav widths and locations shall corn- with the
Regional Standard Drawings.
8. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all :ramp . ement work
within the Public right-of-way, and construction grading on private prccerv.
9. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the
approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage. street improvement.
landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent of the estimated cost
shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection
services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit may be subject to adiu _ment.
10. A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for review of an.: existing
easements and ownership's of properties.
11. The developers shall record a boundary adjustment for the relocation of :he lot lines
conflicting with the proposed building "A." or apply for a lot merger order to
consolidate the three westerly parcels into one lot.
12. A reciprocal drainage agreement will be necessary. based on lot 'line adjustments. and
merging of parcels needed to revised lot configurations for development probe --es.
13. The revised traffic impact analysis was reviewed by the Engineering Dep_-mem. The
recommendations contained in the study. such as provision for a : wav left -um lane
on 8th Street. and the prohibition of parking on the north side of 3th Street _hall be
incorporated on plans and implemented. A separate striping plan for there-_t--_n_ of 8th
Street will be required. The proposed on -site driveway be: -.=teen _'_-:_s shall
remain IS _t. wide.
14. Based on the recommendations of the project traffic engineer. the ::wee par
next to the westerly driveway shall be designated as low turnover
service vehicle area. delivery zone, or employee parking. in order to min
spaces
as a
p tentiai
conflicts '.with on -coming traffic from 8th Street. As for the remainder cf t-= -asking
stalls ad_lccent to the proposed driveways, the planter medians _re stoned and
landscape such :ha: :he existing vehicles maintain a c
15. A comp to -date set of cribw all retaining wad ai - at en_. _a. a
of the SC::_ . ,port _halt be submitted to the En,,:ineerin-
The tics= of the crihwall must account
located .- _ce`.It to top of the slope. if close to .,role_^,
1 b. The . _ ::r:c:cd .ore shall he pianred a I... rm.e
-_._.:ail'. loll. But. plal;t.
and
::o ns
for stability and protection does not address the engineering concerns and is not
acceptable.
17. A new street light, owned and maintained by SDG & E. shall be installed on 8th Street at
mid -point along the length of the project site.
18. Existing power poles may have to be relocated, if in conflict with the parkway
landscaping, but there shall be no conflict with the proposed driveways. The plans must
show all poles with the driveways.
19. Minor sidewalk grinding, and curb and gutter removal will be required on 8th Street
(approximately 50 feet).
20. Plans submitted for building permits must comply with the 1994 Uniform Building Code,
Uniform Mechanical Code, and Uniform Plumbing Code; the 1993 National Electrical
Code; and the State Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations.
21. Engineering calculations and soils reports shall be submitted in conjunction with any new
building construction plans.
22. A completely dimensioned floor plan shall be provided for each building.
23. The plans shall specify the criteria which justify exceeding allowable area as per Table
SC. U.B.C. 1994.
24. The plans shall show occupancy and building type as per Table SA. U.B.C.
25. Leasing space in excess of 1.485 square feet to a single tenant will require the provision
of two exits.
26. Interior roof drain piping and interior over -flow drain piping shall be provided to convey
water from the roofs of the buildings to the ground.
27. Provide 1.6 gallon water closets. or flush -a -meter valves. and 1 gallon urinals. or
flush -meter valves. per Section 179:1.= (b J of the State Health and Safety Code.
28. Glazing subject to human impact shall comply with Uniform Building Code Section
29. Parapet and building_ :eight shall be indicated on the plans.
30. Plans _
�.. for comply `. ith the .°04 Lnitbrm Fire Code.
Fito tire t'.�".A- \Aill be ___ ) ;or 2 hours 1t J. minimum 20 PST residual.
mutt :.^, ..t. that reLiui,cmcnts can ,e me:. It
,VA ner:e r r:s h fin. _ his `.A Chen l ..;pillion. I' Improvements _'rc
necessary to obtain the required pressure. it shall be the property owner's resn:n
enter into an agreement with the Sweetwater Authority to provide
improvements.
32. Fire lanes shall be provided as required by the Fire Department.
to
33. The address of each building (and any suite numbers) shall be clearly visible and pp_ a
contrasting background.
•. 34. Fire extinguishers (minimum Type 2A: I OBC) shall be provided for each tenant
35. Due to the lack of access on the northerly side of the buildings, it may be to
provide additional fire protection measures. The developer shall provide such protection
as deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal.
36. Pursuant to California Government Code 53080, full mitigation is required to he
issuance of a building permit on new structures within the District for the : 770Se of
funding construction of school facilities.
37. Agreements or easements shall be recorded prior to development permit appr_-:_: -..here
access across parcels is proposed, for access to trash enclosures and t-a_-:as'incr
facilities.
38. The parking area for Leader Development properties (APN's. 557-102-03. =_. 23 shall
be installed prior to the occupancy of any building on those parcels. The .-_-area for
Noel Development properies (APN's. 557-102-07. 08) shall be instal:e_ to
occupancy of any building on those properties.
39. The owner of Noel Development properties (APN's. 102 08) sha__ re_c_ e an
easement for the right of access for the Hutchins property. or the future owners ,-P\"
557-102-10.
40. Vehicle circulation shall be provided between the parking areas for Leader De
properties (APN's. 5 7-102-03. 21. 23) and the parking_ areas for Noel De -re
properties (APN's. 337-102-07. 08). The driveway design shall be subject :c __p:
the Planning Director.
1 threelto e westerly d a'" Sc:- -
-�1. The ^arSal_ stalls :::;i..e�.�Ie.l" adjacent L. .�"e_�...:, .. � CO _.. --
be reserved for employe_ parking only. The two interim parking
adiac_nt to the easte evv-av to Sth Street shall be:.ser or _.
only. All narkini, stall shad. he marked subiec::e approval of Planni
City Engineer_
42. A to :r .`,.:.-. .:k: - sh lll he recorded :or those
:iron :or \\ .lore :s . e. "i r. dr:vc`.\av at^.0
`: r
43. The park:._ lot shall be striped with hairpin lines. four to six inches in width. The lines
shall forte.. a band around each side of the stall measuring sixteen to twenty-four inches in
width. Par' -'nu stalls designated solely for use by employees may be striped with single
line markings. Such stalls shall be clearly marked for employee parking only.
44. The developer shall notify the local utilities (gas. electric- cable television. water. etc.) a
minimum of 48 hours prior to filling of any trenching on the premises.
45. The trash enclosures shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Title 7 of the
National City Municipal Code. The exterior walls of the enclosures shall be stuccoed to
match the building. The trash enclosures shall be screened from view by the residents to
the north of the property, and subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
46. Exterior walls of buildings, freestanding signs, and trash enclosure to a height of not less
than 6 feet shall be treated with "Graffiti Melt Coating" manufactured by Genesis
Coatings, Inc. A similar product may be used. subject to approval from the Building and
Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its observance.
47. All mechanical equipment, including any roof -mounted equipment. shall be screened in
accordance with National City's Design Guidelines. Such screening shall be
architecturally integrated with the building in terms of materials. color. shape and size
and shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director.
48. Signs and advertising shall be limited to three monument signs placed along 8th Street.
The name of the center or primary tenant may be placed thereon. Placards identifying the
tenants of the center may be placed on the sign as well. The sign may be internally
illuminated or may have ground -mounted illumination. The sign shall be designed to
reflect the architecture of the center and shall be subject to Planning Director approval.
The height of the sign may not exceed twelve feet form the lowest point, including the
foundation. Tenant identification signs shall be limited to one sign per tenant and shall
consist of individual channel letters not exceeding eighteen inches in height. Such signs
may include a cabinet sign in which the tenants registered trademark is placed. Any such
cabinet may not exceed eighteen inches in height. The signs shall be placed on the stucco
canopy. or along the building face below the roof -line. The tenants of the end suites may
have a si_n of the same configuration. not exceeding twenty-five scuare feet in area on
the end e.,. rations. There shall be no roof -mounted advertising.
49. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan. including plant types. ...e. hods of
pianting. eta. shall be submitted for re'. ie'.w- and approval by the Planning Director. The
landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant planting and water conserving
lCigar:o : _.vices The iandsca _':: for the slopes :behind the buil.a will
have to _ .. atype aba am tcTheof . _- ., � protect .., thestab, • ;lade.
The
_ .. � . ,�.-.�,.. ...�.:, . _�,�„�.. the reconstructed
50. Before the Specific Plan Amendment shall become effective. the devei rers Leaner
Corporation and Noel Corporation) shall separately sign for their respective parcels
have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the P!an inc Deg rt-en__
acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this
Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within -1.-5 da_.s of its recei t
shall automatically terminate the Specific Plan Amendment. The applicant shall ____
submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restricticn
on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall
necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shallpro-
information that conditions imposed by approval of Specific Plan A •: -_end: _er_t ale
binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the prot:e^: T
Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by _-
Planning Director prior to recordation.
51. If the project is built in the two proposed phases, the required interior driveway between
the properties may be used to provide two temporary parking spaces for
(building A). The two interim parking spaces will be removed upon the coT ence-en:
of construction for phase two (buildings B and C).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmined fc _ _o the
applicant and to the City Council for public hearing before the City Council.
CERTIFICATION:
This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning_ Commission at tale:: =e-_ _ __
1998_ by the following vote:
AYES: LARGE, FLORES, V•LZERR.v`A, DETZER, MARTINEELI, B C ., Go:S
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CHA=_l
Harry Guterman
U -J
L'T
)T,
f 1 L I 'V ` E
"
May 22. 1998
Cameron Berkuti M.S.. P.E.. P L.S.
City of National City
1243 National City Elva.
National City, CA 9'9E0
RE: Paim Plaza Center
10766 B: cn Sluff Avenue
San deco CA 9212.1
619)549-9011
Fax: :619)649-9011
Dear Mr. Berkuti:
I appreciate the manor in which you and the Engineering Department has handled this specific Plan Amendment.
There is only one issue left that could prevent this project from being successful. The issue deals with the stone
wall.
I hope that you have had some time to think about my situation and can remove your condition 1.c. before the
Planning Commission on June 1, 1998. I have tried to gc forward with this amendment for nearly fourteen months
now and time is of essence. I cannot afford financially the ongoing expenses of interest. real estate bills. and
other expenses that! have had to carry for the past seven years. I cannot afford to miss the opportunity of the
current real estate market and low interest rates. In the event that you are unable to make the above
determination and would like to leave it for the Planning Commission to make this decision. I would appreciate
you revising the ex's:ire languace so it's somewhat more sensitive to my situation.
I have rewritten your condition 1.c. It is not exactly what you have proposed It but it is very similar. It allows the
engineers that will Jc:n cur team. upon approval of this amendment. to try to solve the stone wail situation. I hope
that you will review my second choice and rewrite the concC:on as I put `crward below.
The existing stone wall along the Northerly property line. the slope treatment, and how the run-off is
channeled through the weepholes in the wall will be conveyed. Any impact on this wail due to the project
is to be considered and analyzed. using current standards, including methods for wall protection, or
retrofitting, if necessary. The portion of the stone wall. which is entirely inside the Palm Plaza property,
shall be demolished. and a new standard retaining wall constructed with complete details shown on the
grading plan, including elevations. and sections. Any related structural calculations shall also be
submitted to this office for review.
The above requirements for reconstruction shall apply only to the stone wall that is located entirely
within the Palm Plaza property boundary. Other engineering or legal recommendations that may develop.
that are agreed by ail parties. such as lot line adjustments. backfill and landscaping etc.. will be approved
by the Engineering Department.
Thani?vcu.
/) i
Har.r/ a femrar
HG:ro
co. Can e ..
1
IO.
A
+
-1
i
2 - Ito
Fy' 'rsA
iN
II E1(1S1'11N1L3
�c •
iN/\1_L.._
Nc v N
I
1 t v';ir.p> 2 .;',1,:'v
(1) /\RS"
rt . ,;', '1
(Le r'i-.I7
lc) F�;L Mf\I IJ
Q
5 5
I I
yr„@
I „ r 71PAsp.,
/ i` t A41- 11
-L
(0
City of 1Jational City
Planning Department
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310
ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR
INITIAL STUDY
Project Plans and Environmental Assessment Form Case File: IS-1997-12
received on: December 27. 1997
Environmental Assessment Form Determined
complete by: Harold Phelps
Initial Study completed by: Harold Phelps
Reference Files: EMI-SP-1993-1
Date: March 6. 1998
Date: March 6. 1998
***...*****x*******xx***************x**x*********xx.xxx*x***xx**********xxx**
Address of Project: North side of 8th Street. between `N" Avenue and Palm Avenue.
Project Description: The applicant proposes to modify an approved Specific Plan for the
commercial development of six vacant parcels. The amendment would increase commercial
shopping area from 15.530 to 16.000 sq. ft.. reduce overall parking from 73 to 71 vehicles. and
eliminate the 10 ft. landscaping setback on 8th Street. reducing :he overall landscaping from 15 to 5
ft. in front of the shopping center, but retaining the common driveways and loading areas.
Environmental Setting: The project site is comprised of six vacant parcels. The site has been
previously graded and contains no significant land uses or vegetation. Surrounding land uses are
comprised of signal and multi -family residences. small scale commercial development. and vacant
parcels. The project site is at an elevation approximately twenty ft. lower than the properties to the
north. with a high slope to remain behind the proposed commercial 'huiidings.
Conclusion:
A Negative Declaration is proposed. since:
X (al There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant
effect on the environment: or.
(b) The project may result in a significant environmental impact but revisions
in the plans by the applicant mitigate cr avoid :he effects where clearly no
significant effects would occur: or.
An EIR is required since the project ma% .e_u:H. a significant environmental
impact.
RECO\I\iENDA710\: Thatthe deciro,n.k�n,_r . proposed Ne_ative Declaration
on
to •.pith any comments received during the pubHc .c..e'.\. pro tt 271j finds that on the basis of
........I Study and any comments receivoh that:here :s u-s::a::a: e..idencc :hat the project gill
cant ertcct .>n .Hacir�
There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impae:
environment based on the following discussion of potential. non -significant impacts:
CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN: The project s a specific plan. which is
with the General Plan in terms of zoning for the rrocer7.-. and is in accordance .v; n_=.__
which encourage orderly and planned development. The specific plan amendment
some of the standards required for the type of development proposed. such as paii
landscaping.
CHANGE IN USE: The project site consists of six vacant parcels. The change in land -_ e
vacant to a commercial development is not expected to have a significant effect on ___
environment. The property is zoned for commercial use, and is surround by other commercial
uses and multi -family residential uses. There were no previous land uses on the site.
INCREASED FLOODING: The proposed construction will increase the amount of i_oper---:
surface area, thereby increasing storm water run-off and the potential for flooding. strut --
engineering requirements that all surface area be conveyed to the public drainage system
address in the conditions of approval. Additional drain -pipes or culverts may be required :ere
properties previously drained onto the proposed development. On and off -site improvement: :_
the existing storm water system will be provided during construction. An agreemen: :_ -__
provided to further analyze the potential for increased flooding as part of the __ne_l =
Department's Condition of Approval No's. g. 15 and 16.
GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND EARTH SLIPP,.GE: The seismic activity typical
Southern California region may affect the site. The Uniform Building Code sign_ __
construction will address these concerns for safer• arising from potential ground-s
agreement has been provided to further analyze :he pc:e._:.al for geologic hazards an
slippage as part of the Engineering Department's Condition. of Approval No's. 4. 15 an
AIR OUALITY: There will be insignificant effects associated with the construct:
required for the new commercial buildings as well as non -significant long-term e_:e
vehicular emissions due to the commercial attractions. Traffic to and from the site will =insist
customers utilizing the parking spaces provided.
The potential increase in emissions is not significant. as posed parking will be r_au_ed _-_-
the number evaluated in the previous negative dec'.ara::on. The potential shopping- eenier
must be limited commercial. increasing the likelihood fan: tenants will provide nei=:
oriented businesses or services. The shopping center :s eentrallY located in an comrnu
multi -family residential developments. where pedestrian :r: _ or public transit use 7
should be high.
ALTERATION OF VIEWS: The site '.\iiI after ne'.•.s __-, __ the ropey The cu
from residences north and south of the site arc o __ :s - _ '9 ft. change
from the street to rlte top .)C :fie slopi =i:c. T ite _:lost ': - ..-:J ie'Y is no:
sidnitic ant.
ALTERATIO` TO TRAFFIC PATTERNS: The development will increase traffic in the area.
East cast 8th Street. A traffic study was prepared when the Specific Plan was first
approved in 1993. A revised traffic study was provided as part of this amendment. It estimated
that the project would only increase average daily trips (ADT) from 626 to 640 ADT.. based on
SANDAG Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region (December.
1996), for neighborhood specialty stores attracting 40 ADT per 1.000 sq. ft. of gross leasable
area (GLA). The potential increase in traffic on 8th Street will be less than significant; however.
it is recommended that a new two-way left turn lane be installed on 8th Street for the length of
the project area, and that no parking be allowed on the north side of 8th Street. The shared
driveway use throughout the shopping center should minimizing ingress/egress onto 8th Street.
Other recommended traffic circulation improvements may be required as needed according to the
Engineering Department's Condition of Approval Nos. 13 and 14.
OVERCROWDING OR LACK OF PRIVACY FOR ADJOINING DEVELOPMENTS: To the
extent that there was no development on the site previously, there will be potential increase in
persons attracted to the site to patronize the commercial uses. However, since there is no
residential uses proposed it will not cause any overcrowding. Regarding privacy for adjoining.
developments, the project will affect some of the isolation previously available to residents above
the project on site on 7th Street, but this is not considered significant because in each case the
house are served by rear yard setbacks which buffer the homes from the proposed project.
RED(:CTION OF SOLAR ACCESS OR OPPORTUNITIES FOR PASSIVE HEATING AND
COOLING ON THE SITE OR NEARBY PROPERTIES: All of the surrounding properties are a
significant distance from the proposed project and will not experience any reduction of solar
access or opportunities for passive heating and cooling as a result of the development of the site.
All nearby properties are above or side by side sufficient distance from the property.
INCREASED LIGHT AND GLARE: The development has the potential to increase light and
glare. The lighting required for the shopping center will be controiled by standards for light
alignment and brightness as required in the conditions of approval. Also. glare will be reduced
throwh proper siting of light fixtures and landscaping as required by conditions of approval.
The distance from the site to adjacent properties will also reduce any significant effects of glare.
DEMOLITION OR REMOVAL OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS: A monitoring well has
been located on a Specific Plan area property. but is outside the proposed development areas.
Nevertheless. it will have to be investigated and a report shall be provided as to the current status
of the groundwater being monitored on the site due to site contamination. as stated under the
Engineering Department's Condition of Approval No. 20.
PtBL_C FACILITIES AND SERVICES: The proiect will result :n an increase in the demand for
withintheand Firg protection p
pliC:.� _....-ices. T[... prOleCt lies City Police i.: i .. _. ....c:. areas. The project is
not e?" :O _..P• erse!v affect or reduce the level of seirvic,', CiEV Departments
Prior to construction permits. letters of set'.:..e .- .- troth applicable
ut.ity con:mane_ will be required.
.Also. will pay the required fees Or such se:- or tees. as
sorry, . A.. recuirements of pu'oiic service auencies and
aduressea through
the established permit process and conditions of approval. No significant effect on existing
public facilities or services is anticipated.
BIOLOGICAL & WILDLIFE HABITAT: The site is in a fully developed, urbanized location_
and contains no native vegetation. The project will not have any potential adverse individual
cumulative effects on wildlife resources as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Cede.
A De Minimis Impact Finding shall be made and a Certificate of fee exemption shall be provided
for the California Department of Fish and Game and filed with the County Clerk.
THE CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
NOTICE
The information you provide in this
form will be used to determine whether
or not an environmental impact report
is needed. To avoid unnecessary project
delays, the information you provide
should be complete, accurate and unbiased.
(PLEASE PRINT TYPE)
PLANNING .,__r.R71ENT
7NFTTA"=
GENERAL. INFORMATISN
PLANNING DEPART:1.EN:
SP.5GlFl L pLi i pq 4..r)M0.rT" =E
PERMIT APPLICANT Pb Dv__ l� 11_11J _: . (t i a I Zo--. r �^
NAME AND A _ __RMI=' Ar=_CA;v. 11 klf�}� ("2
NAME AND ADDRESS G- _''4 PROPERTY OWNER � f2
.NAME AND ADDRESS C_ THE PERSON Who PREPARE THE PLAN rDisa.,1j.,t; L_
113(-lSJ4 S7. S44-1 D I n l
DATE OF r-R--_.,..
2IIsla—/
LEGAL DESCRIPTIGN GF THE JOE SITE SgcS
FCR RESIDENTIAL:
FOP ~ TYPE_ _ = 1�/�SCF`J 17� 1 ST>
-- _{--) I' ,ewe '}!/t C, •
1CcE-C
EXHIBIT •A•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 03: APN 557-102-03
The Southerly 175 feet of the Westerly 150 feet of the
Southwesterly Quarter of the Southeasterly Quarter of 40 acre Lot
2 in Quarter Section 131, of RANCHO DE LA NACION, in the City of
National City, County of San Diego, State of California, according
to Map thereof No. 166, filed in the Office of the County Recorder
of San Diego County, May 11, 1869.
PARCEL 21: APN 557-102-21
Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 13959, in the City of National City,
County of Can Diego, State of California, filed in the Office of
the County Recorder of San Diego County, September 18,1985 as File
No. 85-344211 of Official Records, together with that portion of
the Northerly Half of 8th Street adjoining said Parcel 2 on the
South and lying between the Southerly prolongations of the Easterly
and Westerly lines of said Parcel 2.
PARCEL 23: APN 557-102-23
A. that portion of the Southwesterly Quarter of the Southeasterly
Quarter of 40 acre Lot 2, in quarter Section 131, of RANCHO DE LA
NACT_ON, in the City of National City, County of San Diego, State of
California, according to Map thereof made by Merrill No. 166, filed
in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, May
11,1869, described as follows:
COMMENCING at the Southeasterly corner of said Southwesterly corner
of the Southeasterly Quarter of 40 acre Lot 2; thence North
19 44' 24" west along the Easterly line of said Southwesterly
Quarter of the Southeasterly Quarter of 40 acres Lot 2, 40.00 feet
to a point on the Northerly line of Eight Street and the TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; thence continuing North 18 44' 24" West along said
Easterly line, 132.98 feet; thence South 71 06' 14" West, 106.25
feet; thence South 18 43' 53" East 133.02 feet to a point on said
Northerly line of Eight Street; thence North 71 04' 56" East,
106.27 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
"g;c-iTRIT A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT #10
The Northerly on hImdred forty feet of the Easterly forty feet cf the Wiest
the Southeast Qu,.r,',-.r of the Southeast Quarter of Forty Acre Lot Two Ln the
Section One fY n 9 -n Thirty—one of RANCHO DE LA NACIC ' , acCordng tc Mao thereOf — _
by Morrill, No. I.,, ,r, file ;r the office of the County Recorder of sad Lao
County,
EXCEPTING theref.-cm the Northerly
irty feet thereof.
LEGAL' DESCRIPTION '_zr *OS
Westerly Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of 40 acre Lot _t
Quarter Section 13: of the PnNCHC DE LA 2IACICN, in the City cf National City,
of San Diego, Stare of California, according to Map thereof made by -
on rile in the Office of the Recorder of said San Diego County.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM the Easterly 50 feet and that portion of the Northerly .:- feet
lying Easterly cf the Westerly 60 feet.
ALSO EXCEPTING T:-RERRFROM the Westerly 60 feet.
ALSO EXCEPTING "." fi :_.:='RCM the interest in the Southerly 40 feet thereof which waz
conveyed to the 'ity of National City by deed recorded in Book 931, race 25 of =e_=s
:E YA,L DESCRIPTION LOT 007
The West 60 _`e�c ^_` the Sc-atheast Quarter of the Southeast quarter cf the 4: ar e
Lot 2, in Qua: 131 of RANCHO DE LA NACION, in the City of Nat.cra_
County of San 17,, State of California, according to Plat thereof 'a^
No. 166, filet In 7:7e Recorder's Office of San Diego County, May __
EXCEPT:NC, frog described property the Southerly 40 fe_., thereof as __a._: _
to the Ct, cf 'a, -.trial City fur Street purposes by deed dates
Bock 931, ?aoe needs.
ALSO said abc':e described property the Nc t":e_', :__ f^ _-�-=-f
(continued)
A. Background Information
1. Give abrief ...ems__ ._o.. _- the cronosed project. Include
wi'_.l_. .,.._s discussion the _ _nc pai engineering ropcsals.
2. 7esor_be the environmental setting, including distinguishing
natural man-madecharacteristics.JThe discussion should be
.. ..ura_ andman -..._
of
the site without (before) the project and include the imne-
d_a te a_ ea_surro=ding the site.
INITIAL STUDY (continued'
A. Background Information
1. Give a brief description of the proposed project. Include w:_:-_n
this discussion the principal engineering proposals.
The proposed project is situated on a parcel of land consist:--_
of six lots under the ownership of four separate entities
project consists of ;{:ree separate buildings (A - C) of which A
jg proposed as multi -tenant commercial center. -
Buildings B and C are proposed as a single
commercial with a reciprocal parking agreement. All the buiidi-.g=
are within the guidelines of the CL zone. The buildings will te
single story, flat -roofed with numerous architectural de:ails.
constructed of mostly wood frame and stucco finish. The sq•.za e
footage of the buildings are: A:12lcoo sq. ft. B:2350 sq. ft.
16 o sq. ft. Site E is to remain undeveloped
access through site C, is provided for future use. All -- buildings
will share a common trash area set into the rear slope. The center
will have one common loading zone as designated on the plans.
The predominant engineering concern within this prc'e^_: is :_e
necessity to provide a large retaining wall along the entire_ rear
length of the site, due to the large slope that dominates the
The wall would vary in height from approximately eign: fee: _o
fourteen feet with the majority of it at about ten fee`_. wherever
possible existing slopes will be contoured towards the re_ain'_r.g -a=:
in order to minimize the height of the retaining wall. The wall is
needed to allow enough room between the south property line ant _
slope to place the required parking and enough building area
justify the project. The wall will act solely as a retaining
wall and will be independent ofthe buildings rear wails. This -_
allow the retaining walls inevitable deflection (anti:ipa:e'_ a-_
normal) to not effect the roof, etc... of the str.:c_zres.
construction of this wall and the provision of adequate drainage a '_
waterproofing will be the major engineering constraints of
project. All the areas above the retaining wall will be
with drought resistant plants. The retaining walls in :ne
area will planted with vines to cover the walls and e:_m:-.a:e
graffiti.
2. Describe the environmental setting, including distinguishing natural
and man-made characteristics. The discussion should be of :he
without (before) the project and include the immet:a:e areas
surrounding the site.
This is a vacant parcel of land situated on the I-__ __o: __
East 8th. Street, an arterial street in National City. -.._s par:e-
of land consists of six separate lots owned by four se;ara:e
entities. To the East of this property there is a comer_:a_ center
with some similar user mix to our planned commercial :en:e_. -_
the West there is another commercial center. To the i:r:'. ant
above this site exist apartment buildings and single fa=_. `.Y=
To the South and across the street them are severs: scar:_.=-:
buildings and vacant land zoned CL.
INITIAL STUDY (continued)
B. ASSESSMENT OF EN":IRONMENTAL IMPACT
Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space in
Column A.
Specific Questions
1. Does the project significantly change
the present use of the project area?
(The project area includes the im-
mediate location of the project, as
well as more remote areas that may
be directly or indirectly affected
by construction and/or operation of
the project.)
2. Does the project alter any unique,
natural or manmade features?
3. Does the project affect the conser-
vation of any natural or scenic re-
sources or scarce natural resources?
I.
Does the project alter the biological
habitat of flora, fauna or endangered
species?
3. Does the project alter or change ex-
isting features of any ocean, beach,
estuary, bay or tidelands?
Column A
Yes Mavoe No
6. Does the project alter the land form
of topography in excess of 23 percent?
7. Will the project contribute_ to in-
crease floods^
S. Will the project increase the possi-
bility of erosion or 5edimen . _..
Does ^e croJ ec: involve an': oec1 -
ca_ hazards.
kill the .oect increase he possi-
bility of earth s- page?
the ect contra ute ao•:ers-
_.'.0 u a i- _ a i.
xx
Column B
Staff
Analysis
Yes Maybe No
I_]ITIAL STUDY (continued)
B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued)
Column A
12. Will the project affect the use of
existing or proposed recreational
areas?
13. Will the project affect areas of his-
toric, archaeological or aesthetic
value? (The setting of such sites
includes surrounding areas, the nature
of which are important to the under-
standing and enjoyment of the site
itself.)
14. Will the project accelerate the dev-
elopment of adjoining non -urban areas?
(Examples include the introduction of
facilities such as streets, roads,
water mains or sewerage lines in such
a manner as to facilitate development
or intensification of the use of an
area.)
13. Will the project tax the Ci` s or other
agency's ability to provide necessary
facilities?
16. Will the project require any variance
from existing environmental standards
(air, water, noise)?
17. Will the project alter the character
of existing communities'. (Examples in-
clude, but are not limited to:
Changes in ._ ffic patterns
Effects on access within the com-
munity to commercial establish-
ments, schools, parks, etc.
Introduction of activities not
presontiv found within the
coamunit -.)
18. is tde land use proposeci by the ro-
ect in opposition to the City's ex-
isting lan_. ,rocrams, and pol_cces.
Yes Maybe No
Column. 3
Staff
Analysis
Yes Maybe o
INITIAL STUDY (continued)
B. ASS7SSENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued)
Column A
19. Will the project require a change in
zone, adopted community or general
plan?
20. Does the project require any variation
from existing codes and ordinances?
Yes Maybe No
x
21. Will the project significantly change
the average population density of the
community?
22. Will the project alter the lifestyle
of the community?
23. Will the project result in overcrowding,
a lack of privacy for adjoining develop-
ment within the community? x
24. Will the project alter or eliminate
views?
25. Will the project reduce solar access
or opportunities for passive heating
and cooling on the site or on nearby
property or result in other effects
on climate or micro -climate?
26. Will the project result in increased
light or glare?
Will the project alter or limit
access to public facilities or
recreational resources?
28. Will the p:-cject affect existing
transportation systems?
29. Will the proect affect the existing
utility networks?
30. Will the prc;ec: a== e e:._sti-:F
corzmunity or city services:
31. Does the pr0ec_ involve the demolition
or removal of exist_nc _ ovements?
Column B
Staff
Analysis
Yes Maybe No
INITIAL STUDY (continued)
B. ASSESS>iENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued)
Column A
32. Does the project alter or improve
the employment base of the community?
Yes Maybe No
X
33. Could the proiect significantly affect
the potential use, extraction, or conser-
vation of a scarce natural resource? (Ex-
amples include, but are not limited to:
Developments which effectively pre-
clude the extraction of the region's
rock, sand, gravel, or other mineral
resources.
Uses which effectively preclude the
multiple use of regional natural
resources in scarce supply.
Activities which tend to diminish the
supply or availability of regional
natural resources that are in
su7 _ .)
34. Are any of the natural or manmade fea-
tures in the project area unique, that is
not found in other parts of the City,
County, State, or nation? (Unique features
include those areas, structures, biological
phenomena, etc., that exhibit distinguish-
ing characteristics not found in other
areas, or, only in a small number of other
areas. Such features can be either good or
bad for human health, safety, comfort, or
conveniences.)
Column 3
Staff
Analysis
Yes Maybe _;c
i c_c`..^^
c--: _—,77".. (continue61)
ET -^ `? ti'IRC„ ., 11 J _ _ _C S
If our have answered yes to one or 1,.cre of the c,llestlons in Section -, but
still think the rrcject will have nc significant environmental effects,
i nGiC.� to your reasons below. THIS IS II,TCi TAYT. Attach aaCi tional
paces, if .necessar .
2cp,(1(T
Frr:TIO L 717A
1. If there are an 2" ri y Cort:.s of ; ineers or other Covernmental
�ublic notices er ,permit numl-srs—a_ .rli cable tc this project, cite the:.
and ;ive crates.
_.-stll..aLe the al. -cunt of
,YaC.I.:,, in c.:..'_C�arGs.
CC C
_ . -bat are the of r.a::--af slc, s, etc.
ata
2
I hereby ac:T.c ie(4c-' that the abov:3 assess —rent Staten..e: _._
true anaccurate to the best C
12/ 15)
ASSL T=LY BILL 3153
(?.ecnntly enacted legislation regarding
California Dement of Fish and Game Fees)
The State recently enacted legislation (AR 3150, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 7990,
effective January 1, 1991) which requires that the Depai �,=rot of Fish f Same
impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the cost of managinc and
tru
st fish and wildlife resources. These filing fees are int✓T_y to
be paid at the time the lead agency (City of ?:ati al City) files the '.Ve-..ice of
Determination with the County Clerk.
.71: PAY, --r OF FISH Allr3 GA; _
If your project has been identified as having a potential impact on fish and/or
wildlife, the applicant must submit to the City of National City a negotiable
chef: in the amount of Si ,275.00 if this project includes a negative declaration
or a check in the amount of $875.00 if this project includes an Znvironnental
Impact deport, pursuant to Section 711.4 of State Fish and Game Coda. The
our -se of the above State estahlished fee is to defray the cost of manacinc and
protectinc fish and wildlife resources which may be impacted by devel_o .�.
The chec:.rade payable to the County Clerk of San Diego County is recui_re to be
su ritte'. to the National City Planning Der. artrent within five (5) days after
the project has received final approval and is no longer appealahl ^a' • ..— to
suhrit a negotiable check will cause the project approval to L t null and
VO2f since the environmental notice of Fletermination can not he filed wtzhcl.t
-ayment of the above fee or authorized notice of exemption as provided in
Section 711.4. NC 3UTTnL:G P=7S 07s CT ;.' TEzPr' T m
=IL Pl'_ "7"7 IS ?72"= ram.
Federhart & Associates
2845 Nimitz Blvd.
Suite G
San Diego. CA 92106
(619) 226-0625
FAX (619) 222-4382
February 3, 1998
Introduction
TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDIES
Traffic Analysis For The Palm Plaza Development
JF9805
In May, 1993, this consultant conducted a traffic study in National City, for a
commercial center that, though approved by the City at that time, has never
been constructed. Now, almost five years later, a slightly modified plan for
the project is being re -submitted, and this traffic analysis will update the
original traffic report.
To start off on this new analysis, a meeting was held with Mr. Sam
Arabzadeh, of the City of National City's Engineering Department. He said
an updating of the 1993 traffic analysis was adequate as long as the traffic
generation, traffic assignment and internal project traffic circulation was
addressed. He also wanted to be sure that the project traffic would not cause
traffic congestion or safety problems along 8th Street for the City of National
City.
The Project
The Palm Pla7a commercial project is only made possible through the
cooperation of a number of landowners who own very difTicult vacant land
along the north side of 8th Street just west of Palm Avenue in National City.
The project is divided into three separate one story buildings labeled A, B &:
C from west to east facing 8th Street. Building A on the west is the largest of
the three and contains 12000 square feet of Gross Floor Area (GFA).
Building B, the middle one, contains 2350 sq. ft. of GFA while Building C
the east has 1650 sq. ft.
Each of the buildings has off street parking spaces in front of it and a
longitudinal driveway that connects all the parking without driving out onto
8th Street. These are to be three alley type entrance driveways to/from 8'
Street so that no one driveway will be overcrowded.
Project Traffic Generation
Using standard regional SANDAG traffic generation rates, Table 1 shows the
estimated project traffic generation.
Table 1
Palm Plaza Estimated Traffic Generation
Peak Hours
ADT 2 Way AM* PM**
Building So, Ft. Rate ADT In Out In Out
A 12000 40/1000 480 8 6 22 22
B 2350 40/1000 94 2 1 4 4
C 1650 40/1000 66 1 1 3 ;
Totals 16000 640 11 8 29 29
*At 3% of ADT split .6-.4
**At 9? "0 of ADT split .5-.5
As can be seen in Table 1, the PM peak hour contains much more tramc
does the A\1 and therefore, from here on, only the PM peak volumes will be
used.
Project Traffic Distribution
By looking at existing land uses, freeway interchanges, and existing traffic
flows, it is estimated that traffic to/from the project will be divided quite
evenly between east and west along 8t Street.
Project Traffic Assignments
Figure 1 shows the estimated project traffic assigned to 8th Street by average
daily traffic (ADT) and PM peak hour. Also note that each driveway also
shows the PM peak hour traffic volumes both in and out by direction.
Project Traffic Analysis
The project volumes shown on Figure 1 are very low and cannot cause a
congestion safety problem for National City if properly accommodated with
the project.
At the present time, if the Figure 1 left turning vehicles were present, they
would be stopped in, and turning from, a through traffic lane. This is never
good on a busy street since it causes congestion and rear end type accidents
that will only get worse as volumes along 8th Street increase.
Project Conclusions and Recommendations
As has been documented above, the project will generate relatively light
traffic volumes, but even so, they must be accommodated in a safe and non -
congesting manner. To do this, it is recommended that a separate, two way
left turn lane be implemented along the project, in addition to the existing two
through lanes in each direction, on 8t Street.
/1/OT /o c-cc4E
<_( :/&.cY, c7
%X = f'A'I 176A Jc 8.
c ;-ia AtJ
B'..t> - A
/
r . ,
5) 4—/Go
R4 je i i% Cr
• *" >C
E--
/?4 km/C r //i D `T
, i
r
♦ % /
C
/ 4,e x/A+/G-
,2(1
2') E--/6L
8 774/ S?.P FE?"
/ Ai / -4ZA
SS/ Gi✓A 7-
/Gc
A nine foot wide, two way left turn lane can be created on the 64 foot
pavement, by leaving parking along the south side but prohibiting narking on
the north or oroiect side. The following diagram then shows how the
pavement can be safely striped so that left turning vehicles traveling in either
way on 8`' Street can do so with more safer than now:
r
11'
9
u'
}
i4'
/Io 2 (7.) T
The turning volumes at the driveways shown on Figure i are so small that no
"interlocking" problems can develop. Also, since parking is to be prohibited
along the project, the sight distance from the driveways will be unlimited thus
the accident potential at the driveways will be minimized.
In order to assure easy and quick entry to the main parking driveway from the
middle project driveway and ensure adequate circulation along the main
driveway, the 18 foot wide driveway between Building I and Building 2
should be widened. It can be easily widened about three feet by changing
two standard sized parking spaces immediately north of this driveway to
compact spaces, and such is recommended.
An alternate to narrowing the two parking spaces in order to widen the
connecting driveway, is to not have the driveway connecting Buildings I and
2. Though this would diminish the off street circulation, it would add two
parking spaces to the project's total off street parking spaces.
At the project's west driveway, the fire hydrant should be moved easterly far
enough to have a standard handicap ramp with adequate walkway clearance.
This driveway will work very well if the three parking spaces are used for
low turnover employee parking and such is recommended.
In summary then, access to the project as proposed, can be readily and safely
accommodated by creating a two way left turn lane on 8th Street adjacent to
the project, by prohibiting parking on the project side of 8t Street, and by
ensuring that the driveways work very well. With implementation of the
above, the City of National City can be assured of safe, good access to from
the Palm Plaza commercial project.
Federhart & Associates
MAR 181998
Harry Guterman
March 12, 1998
Harold Phelps Assistant Planner
City of National City
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, CA 91950
RE: Palm Plaza Center
8th Street, Resolution # 93-122.
Lot Numbers 3,21 &23.
Dear Mr. Phelps:
10756 Bircn Bluff Avenue
San Diego CA 92131
(619) 549-9011
Fax: (619)549-9011
I am restating the following reasons as to why I am seeking a specific plan amendment:
1. Developing my site separately from the others will enable me to develop this parcel
when I am ready and have my financing in place. I will not be dependent or delayed
waiting for the other property owners if they are not in a position to start construction
2. My asking fcr an increase in the building is two fold. The first reason is the simple fact
that the stores are not deep enough in the present configuration. In our last design
once the outside walls. bathroom and a small storage area are added to the rear of the
building it leaves a very small space for a retail or working area. The preferred depth of
a retail store is normally a 50' minimum. If I decide to build this building out of block
walls. the interior of the building will almost remain the same as in the original plans.
The second reason is additional interest, building an improved retaining wail system
and the additional requirements imposed on this site by the engineering and planning
departments raise the cost of the center. In order for me to be able to build this center
and pay for ail the above additional expenses I would need to increase the size of the
center by a only 470 sq. ft. Without this additional square footage this project will
impose a hardship on me.
I appreciate your kind consideration to allow a 10 ft. landscape area in leu of the 15 ft.
on the original approval. I wish that your allowance of a 10 ft. landscape area would
have been suffcient. Unfortunately it will not be enough to deal with the extreme high
slopes the structures above and the legal ramifications that could arise by building the
retaining wail closer to the structures behind my property. In my presentation to the
planning commission I proposed a new type of retaining wall system. This wail system
will be less subject to graffiti artists. It will enhance the center, stabilize the slopes and
esthetically improve the neighborhood. in order for me to utilize that wall system I am
told by our engineer that I will need to create a space between the building and
retaining wall behind the center. The additional area above the retaining wall could be
landscaped, maintaining approximately the same total landscaped area as the
approved plan. My situation is a true hardship. The site is very difficult to develop. If it
wasn't for the huge slopes in the rear the cost of the land and the constraints put on by
lenders I would not be asking for any consideration.
Thank you,
HG/hg
cc: Dan Linn Architect
Harry Guterman
March 2, 1998
Harold Phelps Assistant Planner
City -of National City
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, Ca 91950
RE: Palm Plaza Center
8th Street, Resolution # 93-122.
Lot Numbers 3,21 &23.
Dear Mr. Phelps:
10756 Birch Bluff Avenue
San Diego CA 92131
(619) 549-9011
Fax: (619) 549-9011
I agree to provide the information you requested in your letter dated January 20, 1998 on
the conditions number 4.15 and 16.
HG/hg
cc: Dan Linn Architect
HP5
NOEL I)i:VISLC,i"di:iTCORP
TKT. .No S.Vuv,
March 5, 1998
Harold Phelps
Assistant Planner
City of National City
1234 National City Blvd.
National City, CA 91950
FAX TRANSMISSION (619) 336-4336
Case File No. MI-SP-1993-1
Dear Mr. Phelps:
I hereby agree to provide the information you requested in your letter dated January 20,
1998. In particular, conditions #4, 415 and 416.
Please call if there is any additional information and statements you need from me.
Si
Richard Binket
President
(l1 l(.(.%) "r.��'PT2
Harry Guterman
10755 Birch Bluff Avenue
San Diego CA 92131
(619) 549-9011
Fax: (619) 549-9011
February 11, 1998
Harold Phelps Assistant Planner
City of National City
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, Ca 91950
RE: Palm Plaza Center
8th Street, Resolution # 93-122.
Lot Numbers 3,21 &23.
Dear Mr. Phelps:
As per your request and letter dated January 20, 1998 I enclosing a new Traffic study
provided by Federhart & Associates. I assume that this is all you need to establish our
public hearing date for April 6, 1998.
I would also like to add that condition No. 20 is not on my property and not on any of the
lots that buildings are to be built. Please eliminate that condition from that list.
I will also be glad to provide you with any information with regards to condition number 4,
15 and 16 as you requested.
I am also restating the following reasons as to why I am seeking a specific plan
amendment:
Develop my site separately from the others. This will enable me to develop this
parcel independently from the other owners I will be able to start this project when I
obtain financing and not be dependent on the other property owners obtaining their
financing. (This has been a problem for me and the other owners)
Increase of the building size by approximately 470 square feet is:
a. My asking for a larger building is because the stores are not deep enough.
The preferred depth of a retail store is at a minimum of 50' but 60' is
preferable. I am not asking to add any more frontage tc the shopping center
just merely 2' in depth this depth will bring this center to approximately 45' in
depth still below the 50' minimum. If we decide to build this building out of
Pay_ of
block wall the interior of the center will almost remain the same as in the
original plans.
The cost of building the retaining wall behind the building regardless of its
location raises the cost of the center. In order for me to make the numbers
work, I would needed approximately an additional 2,000 sq. ft. I realize that
this much square footage will be too much to ask for so I have reduced it to
470 sq. ft. Without this additional square footage this project will not pencil
out.
3: Moving the building South 10' South:
a. Moving the building South 10' South will allow for a better aesthetic looking
retaining wall system. This wall system will be less subject to graffiti artists.
Moving the wall forward will give me the opportunity to bring more depth into
the building. It will reduce the legal ramifications and liability by not having to
work as close to the unstable structures and homes above.
b. The additional area above the retaining wall would be landscaped.
maintaining approximately the same total landscaped area as the approved
plan.
4. Going back to the original drive through between the centers:
This original scheme is acceptable.
5. Combining buildings A&B from the approved:
a. This would eliminate the need for phasing the two buiidincs. These buildings
can now be built as one.
I hope that all the above statements and reports are sufficient to move fonNard with the
public hearing.
Than
ou.
Harry Guterxtiran
HG/hg
cc: Dan Linn Arc^:te
:'•
•
•
C) ifi-;• —
1 7
I.'.
/
4'-
1 ,,././
1.p• 1
I - - '-'-'-' ,;,....ii7:31 ;1., A
, ...
2 oo'
s 1
P4)41,14 VANI04
- 6
▪ / It'
ri
I. 1 t: 11.
I (
ventE
u-KET
Phase One
ft"
CO
Ft -LA kl-AZA
isu
Phase TWO
$ IIILDInlA7,`-
�r�
L 55J .&
�zuu.ol� a'c
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA.
APPLICATION for:
Specific Plan
Amendment of a
Specific Plan
Make checks payable to the City of National
City
File application with the National City
Planning Deuarmaent
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, Caiiforua 91950
(619) 36-310
PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WI -EN
COMPLETING THIS FORM
FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY
Case Number
MS- SP-
Fiiine Fee S h T-4e eiut No.J T
Date Received 1�I?�— By F1.
E.A.F. Required ) S Fee S 3 SO
Related Cases
SEE FILLVG iNSTR 'CTIONS AND CHAPTER 18.112 OF THE NATIONAL CITY ML7 ICIP. L. CODE FOR
MORE r\'r OP 1L IIO N
I;"", e hereby request the National City Planning Commission to set a public hearing to consider a
Specific Plan or an Amendment of Specific Plan No. sip- I cicn - I. Ordinance No.
or Resolution No. to accomplish the following: H a=_ 'r1P<DS-;-�
lc'pi-A-, lc' Lhrr.l t7yAiF .
�`TZ! P CLi -_ 1 114Sc j -4"Ro? 7`1 L i . I NC.i? �Z
L I>< llL1-)iLic. A CCC7 �CGt•—{ iNG C ' 4
1;5 - Lelt.'G {�. fi0
wr2y''1 ? UPINbQLb&1 IrJDlVlDUGS!_ 8�IS
must furnish an Assessor's page obrainabie from Cowin. Assessor's Ofrice or
^roared OZ a tide company. a licensed engineer or :and SZ(r"c'. Or Sio aIng exact
,._..:a...:es of :he subject pronerryy. Sketches. mars. etc. ti:at ui(: a:a the Panning
Co>m?:as:or. s rev:etia of this request are encourage".
Sp _.—:—.. P:_-. _r ...._.._..._.., of a cc c.. Plan \npiicadcn
Rey:___ _ .._.
n�„o
This request for a public hearing for a Specific Plan or Amendment of a Specific Plan is being
requested for the following reason(s). I ra,^7
A-7" Scutz.I or. -rt f`_Y_Z
OP L.16 , cootr, -to Sf n<V i- tJI Lc!
1h+�vH -T " cLCGE� GY2 /51-Z; vcPUA.0
Respectfully,
I ik2
Cct`t/79-7-c6'7/
(Q�4',6"7• �9
1221
PROPERTY OWNER'S CONSENT TO THIS REQUEST:
4,-r r ;
Name (print)
Signature
Address
Phone
FAX
Date
Name (print)
Signature
Date
NOTE: All owners of properrt within the boundaries of the existing and proposed Spec fic
Plan must sign their consent. Attach an ownership list with consent signatures for
more than one ownership.
ATTACHMENTS: Land Use Code Section 18.112.090
California Government Code Section 65461
Specific PIa.. Or \m .. ..._... or .. Spec:tic Plan .fin .ion
Revised June. o�i
PROPERTY OWNER'S CONSENT TO THIS REQUEST:
NO D ' P'" Ievr GgiR Name (print)
Signature
Date
i*'iz47
NOTE: All owners of property within the boundaries of the existing and proposed Specific
Plan must sign their consent. Attach an ownership list with consent signatures for
more than one ownership.
ATTACHII/LFNTS: Land Use Code Section 18.112.090
California Government Code Section 65461
Recuest :o Initiate a Specific Plan or Amendment of a Specific Plan Application
Revised June, 1997
Pa7.e 3 of 5
RESOLL ITCN NO 9 : ,.,
A F ESCLL i ION OF Ti-L CITY COLNCIL
OF Tic. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
ADOPTING A SPELL IC PLAN FOR
PROPERTIES ON TEE �iOR: = Si1JE OF 8TH Sit=T',
EAST OF N AVEN E, WEST OF PALM AVENUE.
APPLICANT DAL LIN'N
CASE FE_.E NO SP-199 - i
WEER AS, the City Council ofNational City at their meeting of Au< st I:, 199=
adopted resolution no. 92-15: directing according to California Government Code Sec :tort
65450 (et.sea.) that a specific plan be prepared for certain properties on the north side of
8th Street, east ofiN Avenue, west of Palm Avenue; and.
WHEREAS, application was made for a specific plan for properties on the north
side of 8th Street, east of N Avenue, west of Palm Avenue for said certain properties as
directed by Council resolution no. 92-15 , and.
WI-iREAS the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered said
application and plans (Exhibit A-r ev.sed, dated May 14, 1993 and Exhibit B-re`. Ised. dated
Masi 14, 1993', Case File No. SP-1993-1) at a public hearing held on June 21, 199= at
timethe Planning Commission . � .
which .anillnconsidered oral and documentary evidence. and ..
staff report. prepared for Case File Nos. SP-199_-1 and IS-199 -1 , which are
incorporated herein by reference, and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Comumission did consider the propo
sed Neciat.'•e
Declaration (No. IS-11993-11) together '.v'..t comments received during the public revievs
process and all evidence and testimony present__ a: the blic hearing, and,
WF�.RE. S the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 9-9=
recommending approval oI the Specific Plan for properties on the north side of Stn Street,
east of ti Avenue, west oI Palm Ave.n.ue, and.
WHEREAS, the CityCouncil of the City of National Ciry considered Plannihz
Commission Resolution No. 9-3,3 and ihe proposed specific plan (Exhibit .A -revised d____
May 14, 199' and Exhibit B-revised. dated May 14. 1C93) at the public hearingheld o..
AugIIst at wits. time .he L.; Council considered oral and doc'_rnen.--_
evidence. and toe ocrt for CaseNos and lS -, . and.
-o.:cr.:s to all e es r
State law
Resolution Ne. a' -
Page 2 of 3
WNIREAS, the proposed Specific Plan SP-1993-1 is in compliance with
Sectionpertaining .o t o ontent of specific plans.
Government Code ec:ic :o-_ I .,,
NOW, TIERE=ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
National City, California_ that the testimony and evidence presented at the public hearing
support the following :findings:
That the proposed specific plans consistent with General Plan policies which
encourage new development to occur in a planned and orderly manner, to be of
the highest quality and most appropriate to the needs of the community, and
enhance and complement surrounding areas.
2. That the proposed project is consistent with the Limited Commercial General
Plan designation which provides for small scale, convenience retail
shopping facilities at the neig:h:bcrhood level.
3. That because of special circumstances applicable to the proce:-y, including
size, shape, topography, location or surroundings. the str.c: application of Title
I3 (Zoning) of the Municipal Code deprives such property of privileges
enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under identical zoning
classification, since the area of developable land is limited by the change in
lev i from the reer theprotothe rear:he slope
elevation ..,,... street. to proper -.es by eswhich
measures approximately twenty feet in heignt.
4. That the re vested exceptions are subject to such conditions which w 11 ensure
that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant oI special privileges
inconsistent with the limitation ucon other properties in ::he ,.icirdtti and zone
such cesituated.
in which prc,,...,v is sit,....... since the site topography and required
setbacks limit the area available for parking .g and S1. placement.
5. That the adjustments requested do not authorize a use or activity which is not
otherwise expressly authorized by .he zoning re- iaticns gover-ring the oarceis
of proper-, since :he proposed development and accessonv =ritiing
are allowed n the CL (Limited Co......e.cia!) zone.
BE IT : �R =�R RESOLVED that the City Council has conciidered the proposed
Negative Declaration No IS-.99_-.: together •.lit., comments received during the oubipublic
re•.ie'.v process and the basis :_ _ comments rece. .no:
there is no suc_t_...._. t.. _. i,. ria.e effect on :ne
environment. Ne e_. a - :he ....
Notice
Resolution No. 9 3-1__
Page 3 of S
NOW, TriEZE:ORE, the City Council adopted ubiect
to the following conditions:
1. Grading and drainage plans which show ail proposed and existing on -site and off -
site improvements shall be submitted. The plans shall be,orepared by a re_ stered
civil engineer in accordance with the Ciry's standard requirements. The plans shall
address the existing stone wail along the ❑crheriv ^roper✓ line, the slope
treatment, and how run-off channeled through the weep -holes in the wail will be
conveyed. The plans shall also address how the stone wail will effect this proiect .
If deemed necessary by the Ciry Engineer, the structural stability of the wail shall
be analyzed, and calculations shall be submitted to the En_ neering Department for
review.
2. Landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submired to the Engineering Deparmen:
concurrently with the grading plans. The grading plans shall address the method of
drainage conveyance from the landscaped areas, including the slope.
3. Hydrology and hydraulic studies shall be submitted. ?ill sur=ace run-off, including
from landscaped areas, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities and
directed to the street by sidewalk under -drains or -urb cutlets. Water from the
proposed landscaped areas will not be per: i,:ed flew onto the side'.yal on St.-.
Street. The drain pipes shown on the site plan shall have straight alignment
the prcpemy to the existing curb cn 8th Street.
4. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering De:a men:'s
review. The report shall address the stabiiir✓ oI all existing and proposed slopes on
the property, the stability and adequacy of any existing or new building pads (on -
site and at the top of the slopes), criteria for retaining wall design~ maximum
allowable bearing. pressure and the required pavement st :o s:rai section for the
proposed parking and driveway areas. A complete up-to-date set of crib
wail/retaining wail calculations. using the design c-.eria of the sous reocrt shall be
submitted to the Engineering Department for review. and
S. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage co.:ec:ion and disposal
shall be shown on the plans. Laterals shall be a ..t........ : robe .. __ .. s in sine and
shall be installed with organ -outs. Each ,_.._. s-.a.. ,.,, sec:irately and
inderienden ly connected to the sewer.
Easements exist on these orcoerties. sso'er City of Nations.. .,,_...cis a.::.._
report sic......__ th C: c and
a . _.
Cam`— �C �'
Resolution,'=c_ ; ----=
Page 4 of 8
;. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the proper:-:
frontage shall be removed and replaced. Specifically 31 square feet oI sidewalk,
as marked, and 60 lineal feet of curb and glitter, as marked. These quantities are
approximate, and may be subject to change as determined by the City Engineer.
8. The existing street improvements on 8th Street shall be kept free from weed
growth by the use of special weed killers or other methods approved by the City
Engineer.
9. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to
the approved cost estimate for all of the grading, drainage, landscaping and
irrigation, retaining walls, and the street improvement work shall be posted. Three
percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City for plan
checking and inspection cost at the time the plans are submitted. The bond shall
be posted prior to the approval of any building per its.
10. A pe.mit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement
work within the public right-oI-way and for all grading. operations on private
prope^,7.
11. The site plan indicates a conflict between proposed Building B and the adjacent
prcperry line. A lot line adjustment or lot merger will be required. Reciprocal site
parking agre_ments shall be submitted to Engineering Department for Buildings A
and B. and for Buildings C and D The plans shall address proposals for
development and access to Probea ' E.
12. All proposed driveways on this project shall be per regional standard drawings as
amended by the .-americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), complete with pedestrian
ramps on both sides. The driveway shall observe a minimum 6 loot setback from
drainage outlet points, and 3 foot setback from any obstructions (fire hydrants,
power poles, water meters. etc.). Total driveway openings shall not exceed 60
percent of the proper^✓ frontage. The grading plans shall indicate driveway and
parkin lot gradients and slopes in accordance with the National City N1ur.cipai
Code requirements.
13. A rwc-wayIe: ._... pocket Pe installed in accordance with, the
subno:led with aoplicatHon This will 7eCt.tile the elimination of on -street
parlor._ aloe north s e sib Street. A s:r-pm_ plan show,:_
sir tt _ubnn:..__ fo the
. Cit. Enginee_ _
The a "`c Par:<:' Zp „_ su� to appro a.
P. E
Resolution `:o = —1.2
Page 5 of 3
14. The developer shall notify the local utilities (gas, electric, cabie television water,
etc.) a minimum oI 48 ,lours prior to back -filling any trenching On the premises.
15. The buildings shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions
of the 1991 Editions of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code,
Unifct-n Plumbing Code, the 1990 National Electrical Code, Title 24 (energy and
handicapped requirements for commercial buildings) and new federal accessibility
standards (AD A).
16. Engineering calculations and soils reports shall be submitted in conjunction with
any new building construction plans.
17. A completely dimensioned floor plan shall be provided for each building.
18. The plans shall specify the criteria which justify exceeding allowable area as per
Table 5C, U.B.C. 1991.
19. The plans shall show occupancy and building type as per Table 5.a U.B.C. 1991.
20. Leasing space in excess of 1,485 square feet to a single tenant will require the
provision of two exits.
71.
Inter:or roof drain piping and interior over -flow drain piping snail be provided to
convey water from the roofs of the buildings :c the -round.
1.6 gallon water closets, or flush-c-meter valves, and 1 gallon urinals, cr flush-o-
meter valves, shall be provided as per Section 17921.3(b) of the State Health and
Safety Code.
Glazing subject to human impact shall comply with Uniform Building Code
Secacr, 5-106.
Parapet and building height shall be indicated on the ^fans.
School fees shall be paid pursuant to Coveiin. ent Ccce No 65995 (Developer
Fees': nor to issuance of am building per--dt_
CO NTf L rD C?..CE
Resolution No. 9 3----
Page 6 of 3
25. The required fire flow will be 2250 GPM for 2 hours at a minimum 20 PSI
residual. Swett -water Authors: must verify in writing that this flow requirement
can be met. It shall be the owner's responsibility to obtain this wrirten verification.
If improvements are necessary to obtain the required pressure, it shall be the
property owner's responsibility to enter into an agreement with the Swee^eater
Authority to provide the required improvements.
27. Fire lanes shall be provided as required by the Fire Depar:ment.
2S. The address of each building (and any suite numbers) shall be clearly visibie and on
a contrasting background.
29. Fire extinguishers (minimum Type 2A:10BC) shall be provided for each tenant.
30. Due to the lack of access on the northerly' side of the buildings, it may be necessary
to provide additional Ere protection measures. The developer shall provide such
protection as deemed necessary by the Fire Marshal.
31. The properties shall be developed in accordance with Exhibit "A -revised", case file
no. SP-1993-1, dated May 14, 1993
Except as otherwise provided by these conditions of approval, development of the
properties as shown on the approved plans C xhbi: 'A -revised", dated May 14,
1993) shall proceed in accordance with the provisions of Title is (Zoning) of the
National City Municipal Code.
shall be limited as follows: Three monument
33. Sig^.s and adve:-isi:. e '.vs: sigh may be
placed along 8th Street as shown on the approved plans (Exhibit "A -revised."
dated i 14;93) upon which the name of the center or primary tenant may be
placed. Placards identifying the tenants of the center may be placed on the sign as
well. The sign may be intemaily illuminated or may have ground -mounted
illumination. The sign shall be designed to reflect the architecture of the center
and shall be subiect to Planning Director approval. The height of the sign may not
exceed nveive feet `crrn the lowest point, including the foundation. Tenant
id --''cation signs shall be limited to one sign per tenant and shall consist oI
individual channel letters exceeding teen inches in height. Such signs may
include a cabinet sic::: in %vh.c.. the tenant_ tiered t. aciemark is placed. Any
such cabinet may no: eXcere .eon inches .. The si%.s snail be piacec
on. the :tucco canto or a._ = ui, :___ roc:-lin.. The tenants
ci ... s ..__ .. a .,..he same cc.._ ._..on. no: _xceecii er .-
: s 7 area toe e. .._.._ n .. oe nc roof -mounter
— 17 ---' --
.
Resolution No = 3-12-
Pade7oIS
34. The parkins? lot shall be striped with hairpin lines, four :c six inches in width. The
lines shall for;'„ a band around each side oI the stall measurn2 sixteen to rvenr:-
four inches in width. Parking stalls designated sciei_ for use by
employees may be
striped with single line markings. Such stalls snail be clearly marked for employee
parking only.
35. A landscape plan and irrigation plan shall be prepared in accordance with the
National City's Guidelines for On -site Landscaping. The plans shall be subject to
review and approval of the Planning Director.
36. Agreements or easements shall be recorded prior to development permit approval
where access across parcels is proposed, for access to the trash enclosures and
truck loading facility.
37. AlI provisions and statements in the speck c plan submitted to the City on May 14,
1993, by Daniel Linn, Architect, shall be binding on the currently proposed
de`ielopmenI and all future development within the specific plan area e.:..,.^t as
modified by conditions of approval. Future development plans snail conicr-; to
site plans and elevations shown in Exhibit "A -revised" dated 5 14,92 unless
otherwise authorized by an amendment to the specifc plan.
38. The owner of A2Ns. 557-102-07 and 10=- 8 reserve an easement fo
r the
right of for the current or future owners of --102-10.
39
The two par'.king stalls immediately adjacent to the putoic -ig :t-cf-wa.v o,parzeis
557-10=-03 and 55 i-I0=-_., shall be reserved for ernpic%ee, parking or' The
.
stalls shall be marked subject to approval of the Plan... Director and City
Engineer.
C-rar=ti-resistant materials shall be applied to the ex:enicr wails of all structures to
a height of net less than six ,om the adjacent grace
The parking area for APNs. 557-102-03. 21 an_ __ shall be installed pnicr to
occupancy of any building on :hose parcels. The ar:<:- area cr -?Ns. 55"-102-
0- and l2S shall be installed prior to occupancy of any Cu:.... _ on :nose ...es.
=. A reciorncal parting ac-e_rnen: shall be recorded C - _
area ._. :v h.oh .her.. is a common dr' e'.v, -r z:
C �T � E9 0".
Resolution No. 9 3-722
Page Sofs
43. The trash enclosures shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Title 7
of the National City Municipal Code. The erector wails of the enclosures shall be
stuccoed to match the building. The trash enclosures shall be screened from view
from the residents to the north of the property subject to approval of the Planning
Director.
All mechanical equipment, including any roof -mounted equipment, shall be
screened in accordance with National Citv's Design Guidelines. Such screening
shall be architecturally integrated with the building in terns of materials, color,
shape and size and shall be subject to approval of the Planning Director.
45. Vehicle circulation shall be provided between the parking areas for Buildings A
and B and the parking area for Buildings C and D. The location and design shall
be subject to approval of the Planning Director.
46. All site improvements, including sidewalks, grading, street improvements and
retaining wails shall be constructed concurrently.
PASSED and ADOPTED this
ATTEST:
17
LORI ANNE PEOPLES, I T Y CLERK -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GEORGE ri E.ISER_ III -CITY ATTO?\c'.
day of ;1;2.7. st . 1993.
GEORGE A. WATERS. MAYOR
Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California.
on August l 7 , 1 ? 9 by the following vote. to -wit:
Ayes: Councilmen Dada, Inzunza, Morrison, Zarate. Waters
Nays: Councilmen None
Absent: Councilmen
None
Abstain: Councilmen None
AUTHENTICATED BY: GEORGE. H. WATERS
Seal;
By:
Mayor of the City of National City. Calatornia
City Clerk of the City of National. CityCalifornia
I
Deputy
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full. true and car-
rest copy of RESOLUTION NO.of the City of National City
Calif.. passed and adopted by the Council of said City on a u = U s t
Civ Clerk of the Cis_: of Nat: na:
19_�