Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 10-12 CC AGENDA PKTAGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY, OCTOBER 12, 1999 - 6:00 P.M. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER, PARK MORSE. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1999 AND OCTOBER 5, 1999. COUNCIL AGENDA 10/12/99 Page 2 INTERVIEWS/APPOINTMENTS Senior Citizens Advisory Board - Reappointment PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing and proposed finding of no significant environmental effect for subdivision of one lot into eleven single-family parcels at the southeast corner of 9th Street and Paradise Drive. (Applicant: Paradise Knoll Partnership/Wilfrido C. Naval) (Case File Nos. S-1991-1, IS-1999-1) (Planning) NEW BUSINESS 2. WARRANT REGISTER #14 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $237,791.82. 3. Notice of Decision - Conditional Use Permit for a wireless communications facility at 801 National City Boulevard. Case File No. CUP-1999-5. Applicant: AT&T Wireless. (Planning) - CITY MANAGER -* CITY ATTORNEY -* OTHER STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA 10/12/99 Page 3 NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) -> MAYOR —* CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. CLOSED SESSION Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release Government Code Section 54957 ADJOURNMENT Dispense of the Regular Council Meeting of October 19, 1999, and Adjourn to Regular City Council Meeting - October 26, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. - Council Chambers, Civic Center. TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE » L CITY Q r Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor OCTOBER 7, 1999 TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MAYOR GEORGE H. WATERS SUBJECT: SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD Please be advised that Frances Fleck's term on the Senior Citizens Advisory Board expired on August 31, 1999. Ms. Fleck has served one term on the above -subject board and is requesting consideration for reappointment. If there are no objections, I recommend we reappoint Ms. Fleck for a term ending August 31, 2001. This item will be placed on the Council Agenda for the meeting of October 12, 1999. GEORG H. WATERS Mayor GHW:nu ® Recycled Paper CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PURPOSE AND INTENT: It is the purpose and intent of this form to provide the City Council with as much background information as possible on those persons willing to serve on any of the Boards and Commissions of the City of National City. Please note: This application will be kept on file and under consideration for one (1) year from the date it is submitted. PLEASE CHECK THE BOARD OR COMMISSION FOR WHICH YOU ARE APPLYING (You May Apply for More than One) Building Advisory & Appeals Board Civil Service Commission Senior Citizens Advisory Board Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Serra Library Systems Board Street Tree & Parkway Committee Project Area Committee Student Commissioner Planning Commission Port Commission Traffic Safety Committee Library Board of Trustees Sweetwater Authority San Diego County Water Authority _ Housing & Community Development Committee Name: FL- L— C K (Last) (First) Home Address: /0 3 Al. C )(L%L' /5z Birth Date (Optional) Telephone: Residence ( „Z (o ¥— 7 g 3 ) Business/Work ( ) NUMBER OF YEARS YOU HAVE LIVED IN: CALIFORNIA? 7q SAN DIEGO COUNTY? SG y/u NATIONAL CITY? cif c7 /iaj ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER: YES er NO ?v\;i}-: ii}:::i:::: iaz;:l:i i. _".e.'.' ij ixi i��Jj�}}vr-': sib:}'rind!riY:�:iF�:iC(�C:jxiv'.:.rc3.v: •.}W.s.::. vv:y _ .........::.::i.:,v,4.::}:i:i6}'�`-ii}:4:sv}i?i:n :,:ri:: ti:5�:.:Y.v :�:5[.:: v'}:jl': Sn}i::.vn: AE'.� 'C.•::- :}4.C::Hv�'.:Ai•iKy ..:::.::..:..n:..n.:n..:-.e:: :an..:. :c ::::-yyn}i}i`.Si s`.c?<p Colleges attended and degrees held, if any: Related Professional or Civic Experience: PLEASE INDICATE BELOW ANY FURTHER INFORMATION THAT WILL BE OF VALUE REGARDING YOUR SERVICE ON THE ABOVE NAMED BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS: DATE: ! <% / Y' q YOUR SIGNATURE /� c4 RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL CITY 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD, NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE October 12, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING AND PROPOSED FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT FOR SUBDIVISION OF ONE LOT INTO ELEVEN SINGLE-FAMILY PARCELS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 9th STREET AND PARADISE DRIVE (APPLICANT: PARADISE KNOLL PARTNERSHIP/WILFRIDO C. NAVAL) (CASE FILE NOS. S-1999-1, IS-1999-1) PREPARED BY Jon Cain - Assistant Planner DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The proposal involves the subdivision of a 2.02-acre lot into eleven parcels ranging in size from 5,000 to 8,741 square feet. Detached, two-story, single-family homes approximately 1,600 square feet in size are proposed for each lot. The homes are three bedroom, two and one-half bath with a den that may be used as a fourth bedroom. The project also involves widening 9th Street at Paradise Drive to make the street a full -width, two-way street as required by Specific Plan 10-76. The proposal meets all requirements of the Land Use Code and Design Guidelines for the RS-2 Single - Family zone. No exceptions or variances are proposed. Several citizens spoke at the public hearings and questioned the impacts that the project may have on noise, traffic, biology, public utilities, density, site stability, and the eucalyptus grove that currently exists on the property. These issues are addressed in the attached Initial Study. Projects were proposed for this site in 1985 and 1986 while the site was zoned for Two -Family Residential use. Both projects proposed a Planned Unit Development overlay. The Planning Commission denied the zone change request for the first project, which involved development of 34 condominiums. The second proposal, involving 15 detached homes, did not meet setback requirements. Environmental work was not completed for the project, and no public hearings were held. Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A N/A Negative Declaration proposed (see Initial Study IS-1999-1) Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission that City Council approve the Subdivision and adopt a Negative Declaration. Rep BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the Subdivision and adoption of a Negative Declaration based on attached findings and conditions. Vote: Ayes - Large, Valderrama, Godshalk, Parra, Martinelli g ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Location Map 2. Planning Commission Resolution 3. Department/Agency Comments A-2i0 (Me h etttien Resolution No. 5. Photo Simulations 6. Initial Study 7. Applicant's Plans (Exhibit A -Revised, dated 7/19/99) 8. Applicant's Plans (Exhibit B, dated 1/23/99) z t co 1;11 NI O II n •••1 --a p m I o . 141 9th Street and Paradise Drive rim C2 = v °; mE Wz 0 73 -1 o p to Z r co —1 m 31IS 1031'Odd AZIVONflOB 3NOZ 046 2409 160 00 i 2/06 p0 2116 N 2/20 2/22 0 22/0 22/6 cn • 222D N MAP; 2226 m °-4 2230 I a_ 00 u 1t- N 2//7 O 2/20 2/45 uo 2203 E 2209 • aa�1 1 'II? •v • no ° 2219 2/3/ uo 2206 m g unv s�. i 2230 ' 2232 O_ a 2205 22/7 N II 7.50 10. EV g 22/2 g 117.00 9 m 1 e &o..e u • 2226 ue•.o g 02236$ 2/35 2139 /940 / W E Ilk 1661 100o_ fir -77F7- i a u 2/36 1 2/36 m 220 22/21 AVENUE 127a-4°' S N 2226; 117.00 22361 da, ii7•oo 12237 2340 2344 C 2 m C co • • • Co • • cn rn rn .o 12323 2325 m 2327 71 2337 RESOLUTION NO. 5-99. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR THE SUBDIVISION OF A VACANT LOT INTO ELEVEN SINGLE-FAMILY PARCELS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 9m STREET AND PARADISE DRIVE. APPLICANT: PARADISE KNOLL PARTNERSHIP/WILIFRIDO C. NAVAL. CASE FILE NOS. S-1999-1/IS-1999-1 WHEREAS, application was made for approval of a tentative subdivision map for subdivision of a vacant lot into eleven single-family parcels at the southeast corner of 9th Street and Paradise Drive, on property generally described as: All that portion of Lot 13 of Hills of Paradise, in the City of National City, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 1860, Recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, September 23, 1925, lying northerly of a line drawn parallel and distance northerly 145.00 feet, measured at right angles from the southerly line of said Lot 13. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, considered said application and proposed Negative Declaration No. IS-1999-1 at a duly advertised public hearing held on August 16, 1999, and continued to September 20, 1999, at which times the Planning Commission considered oral and documentary evidence; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File Nos. S-1999-1-and IS-1999-1 which are maintained by the 'City and incorporated herein by reference; along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action hereby taken is found to be essential for the preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence introduced in the staff report and public hearing for said tentative subdivision map, support the following findings: 1. The proposed map is consistent with the National City General Plan and applicable specific plans, since the map provides for the widening of 9th Street as required by Specific Plan-10-76, and the map provides for the development of eleven single- family -homes in a single-family zone which will provide opportunities for home ownership. In addition, proposed lot sizes conform with the 5,000 square foot minimum called for by the combined General Plan/Zoning designation. 2. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development, since the proposed grading will accommodate building puss and yard areas for 1,600 square - foot homes. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, since split- level building sites and larger than standard lots will provide useable yard areas on the lots affected by larger slopes. 4. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, since no unique environmental resources exist on the site. 5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, since all necessary public services will be provided. 6. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, since no such easements are located on the site. 7. The discharge of sewerage waste from the subdivision into the City of National City sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code, as specified by Government Code Section 66474.6. 8. The subdivision has been considered by the Planning Commission with regard to its effect on the housing needs of the region, and these needs are balanced by the public service needs of the residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 9. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision, based on consideration of local climate, topography, property configuration and other design and improvement requirements without requiring reduction in allowable density or lot coverage. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration No. IS-1999-1 together with any comments received during the public review process, finds on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, and recommends that the Negative Declaration be approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends that, based on the findings hereinbefore stated, said tentative subdivision map for division of a vacant lot into eleven single-family parcels at the southeast corner of 98' Street and Paradise Drive be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. A Hydrology study (100-year flood) shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The study will consider the area from the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection pipe inlet. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution, and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed development shall be implemented with the design of the grading plan. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Checklist for preparation of the grading and drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department. 3. All surface run-off, including landscaping adjoining the public right-of-way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities, and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface run-off, as a result of this development. 4. Separate street improvement plans shall be submitted, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, showing all of the existing and proposed improvements. The plans shall be in accordance with the City requirements, and shall show the following: Paradise, 9th Street, Paradise Knoll Ct. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced, specifically, on 9th Street and Paradise to the center line of the street. Missing street improvements shall be constructed along the property frontage. 5. The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all proposed and existing irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way. The sprinkler heads shall be adjusted so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk, or the streets. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner, its successors or assigns shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right- of -way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. 6. For P.V.C. irrigation lines in the public right-of-way, a metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of the lines. 7. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City and the street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 modified. 8. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean - out, unless approved otherwise. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 9. A new street light is required on Paradise Knoll Ct. The street light shall be per City standards. The location of the light shall meet the A.D.A. requirements. The feasibility and the electrical energy availability of the street light will be verified with the Public Works Department first prior to its final approval and installation. 10. The existing street improvements along the property frontage(s) shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers, or other approved methods. 11. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. The appropriate document shall be filed with the County Recorder and a copy given to City at time of recording. 12. The existing and proposed curb inlets shall be provided with a "No Dumping" tile in accordance with the NPDES program. 13. The/any unused driveway shall be removed and replaced with full height curb, and sidewalk. All driveways (new and existing) shall be shown on the plans. 14. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the Public Right -of -Way. 15. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for retaining walls and the grading construction on private property. 16. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvement, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. 17. A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for a review of all existing easements and ownerships at the property. 18. All curb return radii shall be 25 feet. The plan shall call -out any required right-of-way dedication, and shall show the relocation of all existing improvements, such as fire hydrant, utility boxes, poles, etc. in conflict with the work. 19. The final map/parcel map shall meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and the National City Municipal Codes including certification, acknowledgment, complete boundary information and monumentation. 20. The Subdivider shall submit an approval letter from Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements have been met. If additional improvements are needed, the developer shall enter into an agreement for the water improvements with the Authority prior to obtaining the fmal map approval. 21. Separate water and sewer laterals shall be provided to each lot/parcel. 22. The developer shall bond for the monumentation, the public improvements and the on - site grading, drainage, landscaping, and other improvements through an agreement with the City prior to the approval of the fmal map. 23. All utility distribution facilities within the boundaries of the subdivision, and within the half street abutting the new subdivision, shall be placed underground. 24. The final map shall be recorded prior to issuance of any building permit. 25. All new property line survey monuments shall be set on private property, unless otherwise approved. 26. The parcel map/final map shall use the California Coordinate System for its " Basis of Bearings" and express all measured and calculated bearings in terms of the system. The angle of grid divergence from a true meridian, and the north point shall appear on the map. Two measured ties from the boundary of the property to existing horizontal control stations shall be shown. 27. Approval of the tentative map expires two (2) years after adoption of the resolution of approval at 5:00 p.m. unless prior to that date a request for a time extension not exceeding three (3) years has been filed as provided by Section 66452.6 (e) of the California Government Code. 28. Plans must comply with the current editions of the Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, the National Electrical Code; and the State Title 24 energy regulations. 29. Each lot shall have a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet and a minimum of fifty feet of street frontage, or a minimum of thirty-six feet of street frontage if fronting on the bulb of the proposed cul-de-sac, consistent with exhibit A-2°d Revision, dated 7/19/99. 30. The final map shall be in substantial conformance with the tentative map depicted in exhibit A-2"d Revision, dated 7/19/99, and landscaping for the project shall be installed at the time of grading in substantial conformance with exhibit A-2°d Revision, dated 7/19/99. 31. The following measures to prevent the loss of historical items shall be undertaken by a qualified historical archaeologist: a. Additional historical and archaeological research shall be conducted to obtain information about the house and its history of occupation. b. Trenches shall be excavated with a backhoe to identify any dump or privy areas where historical artifacts may be preserved. Trenching should be halted as soon as cultural materials are found. c. If intact cultural materials are found during backhoe trenching, they should be removed by hand excavation. d. All materials collected at the site should be cataloged, analyzed, and prepared for curation. e. A report should be prepared for submittal to the City describing the importance of the house site to the history of the area and addressing the history of this particular house. Comparisons should be made with other areas of San Diego County. 32. Buildings shall be in substantial conformance with those depicted in exhibit B, dated 4/23/99. The Subdivider shall record with the County Recorder a notice of restriction to indicate this requirement prior to the approval of the final map. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution shall become effective and final upon adoption. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of September 20, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: Large, Valderrama, Godshalk, Parra, Martinelli NAYS: Ungab ABSENT: Detzer ABSTAIN: -7,40400a- Date: City of National City Office of the City Engineer 1243 National City Blvd., National City, California 91950-4397 (619) 336-4380 1 L„ •IYATioNAzrq irrittEmr May 12, 1999 M4y1 a 1999 ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REVIEW OF SITE PLANS AND TENTATIVE MAPS UNDER VARIOUS PLANNING DEPAR I NT PERMITS TO: Roger G. Post, Director of P1. g epartment Via: Burton S. Myers, City Eng From: Adam J. Landa, Assistant f�'�'1 Engineer Subject: TENTATIVE MAP - PARADISE KNOLL 1. Hydrology study (100 year flood) shall be submitted. The study will consider from the proposed protect area to the closest municipal storm drain collection pipe inlet. 2. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on - site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution, and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed development shall be implemented with the design of the grading plan. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Checklist for preparation of the grading and drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department. 3. All surface run-off, including landscaping adjoining the public right-of-way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities, and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface run-off, as a result of this development. 4. Separate street improvement plans shall be submitted, prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, showing all of the existing and proposed improvements. The plans shall be in accordance with the City requirements, and shall show the following: Paradise, 9th Street, Paradise Knoll Ct. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. Specifically on 9th Street and Paradise to the center line of the street. Missing street improvements shall be constructed along the property frontage. ® Recycled Paper Planning Department May 12, 1999 Page 2 5. The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all proposed and existing irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way. The sprinkler heads shall be adjusted so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk, or the streets. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner, its successors or assigns shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right-of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City's City Engineer. 6. For P.V.C. irrigation lines in the public right-of-way, a metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of the lines. 7. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. Street right-of-way shall be dedicated to the City and the street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 modified. 8. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean -out, unless approved otherwise. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 9. A new street light is required on Paradise Knoll Ct. The street light shall be per City standards. The location of the light shall meet the A.D.A. requirements. The feasibility and the electrical energy availability of the street light will be verified with the Public Works Department first prior to its final approval and installation. 10. The existing street improvements along the property frontage(s) shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers, or other approved methods. Planning Department May 12, 1999 Page 3 11. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. The appropriate document shall be filed with the County Recorder and a copy given to City at time of recording. 12. The existing and proposed curb inlets shall be provided with a "No Dumping" tile in accordance with the NPDES program. 13. The/any unused driveway shall be removed and replaced with full height curb, and sidewalk. All driveways (new and existing) shall be shown on the plans. 14. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the Public Right -of -Way. 15. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for retaining walls and the grading construction on private property. 16. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvement, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3 %) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. 17. A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for a review of all existing easements and ownerships at the property. 18. All curb return radius shall be 25 feet. The plan shall call -out any required right-of-way dedication, and shall show the relocation of all existing improvements, such as fire hydrant, utility boxes, poles, etc. in conflict with the work. TENTATIVE MAP REQUIREMENTS 1. The final map/parcel map shall meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and the National City Municipal Codes including certification, acknowledgment, complete boundary information and monumentation. Planning Department May 12, 1999 Page 4 2. The Subdivider shall submit an approval letter from Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements have been met. If additional improvements are needed, the developer shall enter into an agreement for the water improvements with the Authority prior to obtaining the final map approval. 3. Separate water and sewer laterals shall be provided to each lot/parcel. 4. The developer shall bond for the monumentation, the public improvements and the on -site grading, drainage, landscaping, and other improvements through an agreement with the City prior to the approval of the final map. 5. All utility distribution facilities within the boundaries of the subdivision, and within the half street abutting the new subdivision, shall be placed underground. 6. The final map shall be recorded prior to issuance of any building permit. 7. All new property line survey monuments shall be set on private property, unless otherwise approved. 8. The parcel map/final map shall use the California Coordinate System for its "Basis of Bearings" and express all measured and calculated bearings in terms of the system. The angle of grid divergence from a true meridian, and the north point shall appear on the map. Two measured ties from the boundary of the property to existing horizontal control stations shall be shown. 9. Approval of the tentative map expires two (2) years after adoption of the resolution of approval at 5:00 p.m. unless prior to that date a request for a time extension not exceeding three (3) years has been filed as provided by Section 66452.6 (e) of the California Government Code. AJL:jha2 paradise FROM: SUBJECT: City of National City Planning Department MAY 111999 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP TO DIVIDE ONE LOT INTO ELEVEN SINGLE FAMILY PARCELS AT 2112 E. 9TH STREET. Subject application is tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission consideration. Please submit your comments or recommendations on the proposed project by May 12, 1999. If you have no comments regarding the project, please check and sign below, and return this notice and the enclosed plans. If you have any questions, please contact me at 336-4310. Thank you. JON CAIN Assistant Planner cc: No comments uilding & Safety Department Engineering Department Fire Department Police Department Pacific Bell Cox Cable Ultronics, Inc. San Diego Gas & Electric Sweetwater Authority National School District Sweetwater Union High School D EVIL DI G AND 31:7FTy DEPT. RECEIV<'D APR 2 9 1999 NATIONAL CITY, CA Gc /fv e. , Gc /�c. ✓t ie C/; CA' vP7- s/,/q 9 istrict ® Recycled Paper SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT Planning & Facilities Katy Wright Director of Planning May 20, 1999 Mr. Jon Cain Associate Planner Planning Department City of National City 1293 National City Blvd. National City. CA 91950 Dear Mr. Cain: Re: Paradise Knoll Tentative Map The Sweetwater Union High School District currently operates and maintains the schools serving grades 7 through 12 that are located within the attendance boundaries of the Paradise Knoll project (National City Middle and Sweetwater High Schools). The enrollment figures, based on enrollment data from the California Basic Educational Data Systems (`'CBEDS") and capacity figures for the schools servicing the students from this project are as follows: School Name Permanent Capacity 1998/99 Enrollment CBEDS Capacity National City Middle 837 849 -12 Sweetwater High 1674 1962 -288 Both school sites have been significantly impacted by growth. At National City Middle School (NCM) two relocatables have been added to the school site for growth and a third one is under construction. Analyzed against the permanent capacity, NCM has exceeded capacity. At Sweetwater High School (SUH), 13 portables contribute to the temporary capacity count, however the original design capacity has been exceeded. The District is experiencing growth in National City from inftll projects such as Paradise Knoll. Although, Paradise Knoll generates under ten new students, it is the current capacity limitations 1130 FIFTH AVENUE • CHULA VISTA • CALIFORNIA • 91911 PHONE (619) 691-5553 • FAX (619) 420-0339 kwright@socoe.KI2.ca.us in the Sweetwater District that cause concern about new residential development. It is vital for the City of National City and the Project Applicant to meet with the District prior to project approval. Together we need to formulate a plan ensuring that adequate facilities and funding are in place prior to Project approval so that we may accommodate the projected students generated from this project. We appreciate the opportunity to provide these comments on the proposed project. We look forward to working with the City and the Applicant to provide positive results for our schools and community. Sincerely, Katy Wright Director of Planning KW/lt SETWATER AUTHOR1''r 505 GARRETT AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91912-2328 (619) 420-1413 FAX (619) 425-7469 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT NAY 0 7193 May 4, 1999 Mr. Jon Cain City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY PROPOSED TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 2112 E. 9th STREET CASE NO.: S-1999-1 SWA Gen. File: Water Availability, 1999 Dear Mr. Cain: GOVERNING BOARD J.S. SKI WOLNIEWICZ, CHAIRMAN MARGARET COOK WELSH, VICE CHAIR JAMES'JIM'. DOUD SUE JARRETT BUD POCKLINGTON GEORGE H. WATERS CARY F. WRIGHT WANDA AVERY TREASURER DIAN J. REEVES SECRETARY This letter is in response to a notice of a proposed Tentative Subdivision Map to divide one lot into eleven single-family parcels within the Sweetwater Authority service area. There is an 8-inch water main located on the east side of Paradise Drive and an 8-inch water main located on the south side of E. 9`h Street adjacent to the proposed development. The Authority's records indicate that there is one water service to this property. Enclosed is a copy of 1/4 SEC. 129 map which show these facilities. A water main will be required to be installed in the proposed cul-de-sac to serve the houses that front the new street. At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide fire protection for this project. As plans develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements. Based on this requirement, this project may result in the need for new water systems or substantial alteration to the existing water system. The Authority recommends that your Agency work with ours to determine if the existing water facilities are adequate to meet the added demands prior to issuing a building permit. If the Owner provides the required fire flow information and enters into an agreement with the Authority for water facility improvements, if required, water service can be obtained at a pressure ranging from a maximum of 95 p.s.i. to a minimum of 85 p.s.i. A Public Water Agency, Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas Mr. Jon Cain Re: Water Availability Proposed Tentative Subdivision Map 2112 E. 9th St., N.C. May 4, 1999 page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Russell Collins at 422-8395, ext. 639. Very truly yours, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY L,lames L. Smyth Chief Engineer JLS:RC:vls enclosure: photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 129 map pc: Wilfrido Naval Paradise Knoll Partnership 427 Shell Ave. National City, CA 91950 i:\engjoo112112 e 9th.doc 37554 330" 8'A.C. "85 35052 35053 34438 Approximate locations only. E3,3,,,,:c on Record information, For a ,..ora accurate location the water facilI'i must� es be field located. Cali U.S.A. 1.800-422-4133 two working days prior to excavation. N y H 9,- rN> m9 co it. ]f4 SECTION I SCA PAIA 616' 8' A.C. '85 W 57.2 t' . 6. ii $N -�6.0 8'f.H.'740 !g a '4 20194 W.0.12068 + 6482 m • 6193 0 ', m O F 1 u 23326 i p� 20195 39089 6187 O `� 6146 ^' A 7• 0 > - — e.. )% I_24117 m '^ to 6490 0 20196 O1 J 1 • ' I 32628 22150 jz9 22373 22213 22135 27934 6" F.H. '52 W.O. 3729 13307 21467 :.__1_ 9.1166 34788 m 8668 _134437 17924 ML' •WO A2'° 63269649.0 14736 14743 ®, 14759 m I 14744 I n 14737 ELEN ,ors., 1475,91 14749 14740 I 14741 14739 14742 14745 14736 18 752 W. ••3j696 14746 14724 O 2780 I to 147$ '14748 14747 6647 14080 N W gip' b tr V1 it n •F- ' G fn Fri PVC 134' 97 W 2964.0 34216 N 21499 m 14769 14768 14767 1n 14766 Gi 74764 f N 14765 14763 32487 14310 14305 14303 14304 14287 14289 14290 1)14291 14292 14293 14294 0 , 14295 14296 14297 14298 29984 EUCLID AVE 360' 8" PVC '95 14272 0 224 1431.N 3850.1 12112 1307 ( -�j-151 /lJ i M I • I 1306.- 160 I 1827: 330' 81 37881! 8 ZV 6 F' W. 11, 2162E 21458I 9891 I-- 4971 26081I 20093 17576 35583 14312 14050 14051 14313� m 14269 14270 31327 WO A2830.0 NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA APPLICATION for Tentative Parcel Map I I wTS V Tentative Subdivision Map Make checks payable to the City of National City File application with the: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 (619)336-4310 PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WHEN COMPLETING THIS FORM FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Case Number Filing Fee $ I 500 Receipt No. 1 3 I Date Received q/73/11 By E.A.F. Required '''>GS Fee $ ?-S5049 Related Cases — s--le('- i SEE FILING INSTRUCTIONS AND CHAPTER 17 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE FOR MORE INFORMATION. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. ' S 7- 22 ©' ( PROPERTY LOCATION I qq.fV�1-rink) tl 1, rry, fE a i i .Sv COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Map Application Revised December, 1998 Page 1 of 3 a$z CIVIL ENGINEER OR OTHER AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Name: W I L FP. Signature (Signature applicatio ► 20 G • Nei owledges that this is being filed) Address: 427 s( Aif° fuA1-142im,.Y, eti �i►V5l) Phone No. Name: PU 11-9 6 , WeR Signature (Sigitature acknowledges that this application is being filed) Address: 37 1T J , S% C4-1)Acir v►STA M 6 I q 10 Phone No. 6l - 4hZ f- 300 Z-" Fax No. Fax No. 6 / T- 4•Z/ Z,Te,7 Date: Date: �l /j f PROPERTY OWNER(S) of all property included in this application: (Attached extra sheets if necessary). Name: PA2A1>Kra) ?Tame: - S66 Airn"CtSD 612INT rasUr-12r0(2 c, krhVlft— Signature N Signature (Signature ac wledges that t 's (Signature acknowledges that this applicati s being filed) application is being filed) Address: 4-21 942 ,v-e, Address: tirA�u w% Y, CA 61lq5D Phone No. vi 20 939 4- Fax No. GM 475 87(0 Date: Arvt Lei, Iaget Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Map Application Revised December, 1998 Page 2 of 3 Phone No. Fax No. Date: APPLICANT PAO S`E k pro Ut- PienZ EL9Ftit' Name: (Please type or print) 9/ ; W It -FAH) o Signature: (Signature certifies the informatio • submitted with this application is true and acc to the best of the applicant's knowledge). Address: 42.7 t u- ky/CitamiiGiY, M 91615-b Phone No. Fax No. Date: &19 20 c1394 6,49 (475 ' 1't) A At it1, (aaq A *R kC £f•) rtoiJt4CNTAz c -094 twrs. 0116190 CO} , q).110 1 oui/ (n�Q to ► i w„at 1 `` Iaas, Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Map Application Revised December, 1998 Page 3 of 3 i276 CiAdzwif 9,v,Q,1 Rzeo I7c (144445 (R ae.IsaM 6ui)IaoI - amend 445 uaoa4) uoi eznensin }aafoid City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR INITIAL STUDY Project plans & Environmental Assessment Case File No.: IS-1999-1 form received on: April 23, 1999 Reference Files: S-1999-1 Environmental Assessment form determined complete by: Jon Cain, Assistant Planner Date: July 15, 1999 Initial Study completed by: Jon Cain, Assistant Planner Date: July 23, 1999 ****************************************************************************** Address of Project: 2112 E. 9th Street National City, CA 91950 Subdivision of one lot into eleven single family parcels and construction of three- and four -bedroom detached homes. The project site is a vacant, hill property surrounded by one- and two- family dwellings. ****************************************************************************** Conclusion: 1) X Project Description: Environmental Setting: A Negative Declaration is proposed, since X (a) There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment; or (b) The project may result in a significant environmental impact but revisions in the plans by the applicant mitigate or avoid the effects where clearly no significant effects would occur; or, 2) An EIR is required since the project may result in a significant environmental impact. RECOMMENDATION: That the decision -making body consider the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and find on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment based on the following discussion of potential, non -significant impacts: CHANGE IN USE: There will be change in use from previously permitted uses on the site. One single-family home existed previously on the property; the home burned down in the 1970's. The proposed project will divide the land into eleven lots for single-family use. The use is compatible with the single - and two-family homes that currently surround the site. INCREASED FLOODING: Runoff from the proposed use will be directed to storm drains, which are considered adequate to handle the relatively small increase in the amount of runoff from the property. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS: There are no active faults in the project area. A geotechnical study prepared by Pacific Soils Engineering, Incorporated, identified no evidence of faults or landslides on the site. The study identified no geologic hazards or constraints on the property. Standard building code requirements will address potential seismic hazards. AIR QUALITY: There will be short-term, insignificant effects associated with grading and construction on the site. The impact of these effects will be further reduced by adherence to City grading standards. There will be long-term effects from vehicular emissions produced by the new homes, however, the impact on air pollution from the addition of eleven homes is considered insignificant. ALTERATION OF VIEWS: The height of the knoll will be reduced and the eucalyptus grove removed as a result of the project. The proposed project will include terraced building pads to provide a more gradual slope across the site; however, the knoll will virtually be eliminated. The General Plan does not identify the knoll as a significant feature. New housing and use of the property will most likely result in better maintenance of the site, which currently lacks irrigation, shrubbery and groundcover. Photo simulations provided by the applicant show that the location of new homes and landscaping will diminish the visual impacts of the cut slopes and crib wall. Proposed two-story homes will screen views of cut slopes. Landscape plans include fast-growing trees intended to grow to the height of the existing eucalyptus trees within a relatively short period of time to help prevent any significant adverse impacts. ALTERATIONS TO TRAFFIC PATTERNS: Completion of the project will result in the addition of four units with primary access on Paradise Drive and seven units with primary access on or from 9th Street. The project will also result in the widening of 9th Street from a one -lane, one way street to a two-lane, two-way street. According to the SANDAG guide for vehicular traffic rates for the San Diego Region (July 1998), the estimated number of average daily trips per unit for single-family residential development is 10.4. The proposed project will thus result in an estimated 114.4 daily trips. The surrounding streets can accommodate this volume of traffic. Citizens in the area have requested widening of 9th Street to allow two-way traffic, and the proposed street improvements will enhance circulation in the area. OVERCROWDING OR LACK OF PRIVACY FOR ADJOINING DEVELOPMENTS: The development of single-family homes is consistent with the existing single- and two-family homes in the area. Proposed lots meet minimum size requirements, and no variances are proposed. The homes will be at a higher elevation than homes to the north and east, and at a lower elevation than homes to the south. The homes will be compatible with the arrangement of other homes in the area, some of which overlook two-family homes to the east of the project site. REDUCTION OF SOLAR ACCESS OR OPPORTUNITIES FOR PASSIVE HEATING AND COOLING ON THE SITE OR NEARBY PROPERTIES: After grading of the site, the rooftops of the new homes will approximate the current location of the knoll. The project site is below the level of homes to the south, and is separated by sites to the west and north by City streets, eliminating potential impacts on surrounding homes. The homes within the project site are adequately spaced to allow for solar access. All homes have yard areas and potential for passive heating and cooling. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL RESOURCES A study conducted in February 1988 by Dr. Susan Hector and William Manley concluded that there is potential for the existence of subsurface cultural remains from the 19t-century home that burned down on the site. Any cultural items would likely be located in the trash dump and privy areas of the property. Because few 19'h-century homes remain in the region, a plan has been proposed as part of the project to conduct additional research regarding the home, excavate trenches with a backhoe to identify any dump or privy areas, hand excavate any intact cultural materials that are discovered, analyze collected materials, and present a report to the City regarding the history of the home. The proposed actions will prevent any potential negative impacts of the project. The project site is located near the Tower House of Moses Kimball at 2202 E. 10th Street, which is included in the list of important historic sites in the City. The project is over 200 feet from the historic home, and proposed construction will be at a substantially lower grade than the Kimball house. As a result of these factors, no impacts on the historic home are anticipated. INCREASED LIGHT AND GLARE The new homes will include both interior and exterior lighting. City codes require that the proposed lighting be directed away from adjoining properties, and lighting will be further buffered by the surrounding landscaping. The new homes and lighting are consistent with the character of the area and will not result in any significant increase in light or glare. PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES Existing City services are adequate for the proposed development. Local schools will require the payment of school fees in order to ensure that impacts of the project are not significant. Since the project is within a developed area, no impact on other services is anticipated. BIOLOGICAL AND WILDLIFE HABITAT The site currently supports almost exclusively nonnative vegetation consisting mostly of annual grasses, weeds, and ornamental shrubs. No plant or animal species listed by the state or federal governments or local authorities were observed on the site during site studies, and none are expected to occur there based on the highly disturbed nature of the site. NOISE A noise study was conducted by RECON in March 1988 to assess the impacts of the I-805 freeway on the project site. This study was updated using 1999 traffic projections, and the updated study identified noise levels in excess of 65 dBA near the front of the four lots proposed along Paradise Drive. Due to the location of the homes on the lots, the excessive noise would be heard mostly in the garage area of the homes. The project proposes to use dual glazed or insulated glass for the homes along Paradise Drive, along with acoustic sound blocker within the front walls of rooms atop the garages. These construction techniques will mitigate noise impacts on the project. INITIAL STUDY ADDENDUM The following analysis addresses issues raised by members of the public at the August 16 public hearing. Biological Impacts Nearby residents expressed concern over potential negative effects that the project could have on animal life. Residents stated that animals such as opossums, hawks, and parrots have been observed at the site. During biological surveys conducted by the applicant on the site, five bird species were observed and no mammals, reptiles, or amphibians were observed. No hawks or parrots were observed as part of biological surveys, and no birds were observed in the eucalyptus trees. The study anticipated that several other species common in urbanized areas were likely to exist on site, and the study concluded that raptors could potentially use the eucalyptus trees, possibly including the red-tailed hawk, red - shouldered hawk, American kestrel, and the great horned owl. Biological studies discovered that the site contains almost exclusively non-native vegetation. Two native plants were observed on the site, these were shrubs located on the steep slopes of the property. Due to the lack of native vegetation, the biological study concluded that it was unlikely that any rare or endangered native species would utilize the site. The effect of grading of the project on opossums, hawks, and other species common to urbanized areas was not identified as a significant impact in the Initial Study. Eucalyptus Trees Several neighbors expressed concern regarding the removal of the eucalyptus trees. Some long-time residents stated that, during public hearings for previously proposed projects at this site, representations were made regarding the significance of the trees. One resident spoke in favor of removing the trees, stating that they are unattractive and they drop leaves onto other properties in the area. Grading for the project will result in the removal of the entire eucalyptus grove. A specific plan was adopted by the City Council in 1976 requiring the widening of 9th Street onto the subject property. The majority of the trees, 17 out of 31, lie directly in the required location of the street widening. Grading for the project to make lots adjacent to the street level with the street will result in the removal of the entire eucalyptus grove. Statements provided by the applicant regarding the visual impact of removing the trees and a map showing the location of the trees and the road widening are attached. The eucalyptus trees are a prominent feature of the property, visible from 8th Street and the residential areas surrounding the site. Eucalyptus trees are not native to the region, and they are not a rare or endangered species. As such, the eucalyptus trees were addressed as a visual resource rather than a biological resource in the Initial Study. The applicant submitted a landscape plan including fast-growing trees intended to reach the same height as the existing eucalyptus trees within ten years. The proposal is intended to reduce the visual impacts of removing the trees to a level below significance. No formal action was taken for approval or denial of any previous project at this site. The General Plan and other City documents do not recognize the eucalyptus grove as being a significant feature of the City. Any comments which may have been made during previous hearings should not be viewed as City policy. Although the eucalyptus grove is a visible feature of the site, City Council adoption of a specific plan requiring the widening of 9th Street is in direct conflict with preservation of the eucalyptus grove. The landscape plan submitted as part of the project appears adequate to establish vegetation on the site as a focal point of the neighborhood within a few years. This will allow the widening of 9t Street and also allow the site to be recognizable for its landscaping. Traffic Impacts Several residents expressed discontent with the safety of traffic in the area. Residents stated that cars frequently travel at unsafe speeds down Paradise Drive, and that the addition of the new homes may exacerbate the problem. As discussed in the Initial Study, nearby streets are adequate to handle the increase in traffic volume from an uiditional eleven units. The widening of 9th Street will improve circulation in the area. The Traffic Safety Committee, staffed by the Engineering Department, is responsible for resolving issues pertaining to traffic safety on public streets. It is assumed that this project will have neither a positive or negative effect on the driving habits of motorists in the area. Any question involving the safety of streets should be directed to the Traffic Safety Committee. Project Density Some citizens present at the public hearing questioned whether the site is adequate to accommodate eleven new units. As described in the previous staff report, the lots will be fairly typical of the neighborhood in terms of size and density. The zone allows a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet; proposed lots on the project site will range in size from 5,000 to 8,741 square feet, with an average size of 6,347 square feet. The zone allows for a density of six to ten units per acre; the project proposes just under seven units per acre. The 18 single- and two-family lots most directly adjacent to the subject property range in size from approximately 5,400 square feet to 16,500 square feet, with an average lot size of 7,260 square feet. The majority of these lots are 6,700 square feet or less in size, only three of the adjacent lots exceed 8,000 square feet. The 18 lots are developed at a density of seven units per acre. The construction of new single-family homes of similar density within existing neighborhoods is identified as an important goal in the General Plan. The proposed project will provide new homes at roughly the same density as the neighborhood. Construction Noise Residents expressed concern that they will be negatively impacted by noise from construction on the site. The substantial amount of grading coupled with the construction of eleven single-family homes will undoubtedly generate temporary construction noise. The Initial Study does not quantify the construction noise that will be generated by the project. Construction noise is regulated by City Codes, which limit construction noise to specific levels, days of the week, and times of day. Although construction noise will have an impact on neighboring properties, the City Code requirements applicable to all construction projects should minimize the negative effects. Public Utilities At the public hearing, neighbors voiced concerns that the water and sewer systems may be inadequate. Also, residents inquired as to whom would pay for the widening of 9th Street. As noted at the public hearing, the applicant is responsible for paying all water and sewer fees, and also will be responsible for paying the cost of widening 9 Street. Although a clogged sewer line did occur in the area several years ago, there are no current deficiencies confirmed by the City Engineering Department or other agencies with facilities serving the neighborhood. The Engineering Department previously recommended grading and drainage plans as conditions of the project. These plans, included in the recommended conditions of approval, would address the same concerns pointed out by residents, including sewage collection and disposal. In addition, recommended conditions require the subdivider to verify and provide adequate water facility improvements as requested by Sweetwater Authority. If the existing water and sewer systems have an inadequate capacity to serve the proposed units, the applicant will be responsible for working with the utility agencies to pay for upgrading existing facilities to serve the proposed units. Site Stability/Drainage Nearby property owners were concerned about both the stability of soils on the site and the potential for runoff from the property following completion of the project. A geotechnical/soils report was prepared for the property as described in the Initial Study. The Engineering Department reviewed the study, and no potential for unstable soils was identified. As mentioned previously, the recommended conditions of approval include a condition from the Engineering Department that requires a drainage plan. In order to satisfy Engineering requirements, the drainage plan will need to show that the site will not drain onto any other property. The Initial Study indicated that storm drains would handle the relatively small increase in runoff. The vacant property currently lacks substantial vegetation that would absorb rainfall, and the site is not improved to prevent runoff from leaving the property. Although completion of the project will increase the area of impervious surfaces, drainage will be improved by required elements to be included in the drainage plan. Also, landscaping will be required, and a landscape plan designed to minimize runoff and minimize erosion of slopes has been submitted. Conclusion The construction of eleven new homes as proposed will have a visible effect on the neighborhood. During construction, there will be an audible effect also. This project is in keeping with the General Plan, which identifies the area as a single-family residential zone. The project is also in keeping with General Plan policies that encourage the development of new single-family homes to increase the rate of home ownership within the City. The potential negative effects of the property do not appear to be significant, and a Negative Declaration is proposed. THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA ENVIIONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM NOTICE The information you provide in this form will be used to determine whether or not an environmental impact report is needed. To avoid unnecessary project delays, the information you provide should be complete, accurate and unbiased. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY GENERAL INFORMATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILE NO. (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) TYPE OF PERMIT REQUIRED 11 wS -tr rAT6irti, stbdiu-1510-4 Ma9DATE A .4 - 1404(11 PERMIT APPLICANT ?R(.APi c iCtsDU. PkMTN 29*1P PHONE NO. /p(q 2.61 ^ (134 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLIC NA rw U' r M Q10✓U to I Iop NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER eAMO 41'e►-t-- AA', NAT1 MAI, Ciry, CA gi4.9) C.. NkViot, -. 42.1 "Rat. /WS, Kool-c- PAATnrgCQttiP - 427 NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PERSON WHO PREPARED THE PLAN 427 ^atilt- /Wt. f Ib Wtt- any ' CA g145) DATE OF PREPARATION Aft@,bt-- (41, 14441. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE JOB SITE NiLrkcoo C,Antvt— Au.- MAT foCrtonl of LoT (3 m� Hi us of ?MAW - CAI elf rJATmiki-- G-ry4 aviny of 5'Abu f nor ST4'LE CA-t-rFogiviA1 AccoA01W To ►,+tv' Tucks tp t , i &'60 '1! i ted (44 Tti. e)rflcc 6iffl4 (ecoMA efr coopTy, SEPPT g 23, (425 ) t4'I tooi2Ti+C-t2Ly or A wive otAbo4 PISTA,m Npi TH 2Ly 114s.&D -r na9ut2t;o AT RiGt1T `nM Sovrt-tokLy &fur or ?NM t-OT 13, Sa►p I'DOTHeALY jfi►aa I s t (G F4T Ltnre 13E0)06 7i o 33 ` CIS 1, q SITE ADDRESS FOR RESIDENTIAL: NO. OF DWELLING UNITS FOR COMMERCIAL: TYPE OF BUILDING ST• , K rl o JUTh— II CtTy , Cf ig 5D SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDUSTRIAL: TYPE OF BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER: TYPE OF BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, C!:LIFORNIA_ INITIAL, STUDY (General Instructions) The State of California requires cities to assess the environmental impact of all development projects before permits for such action are issued. The attached form will assist you in presenting the environmental effects of your project. The form consists of the following sections. A. I3AC (G_ROUND INTOR17ATION You will be asked to give a general description of the project and its environmental setting. E. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIROr'MENTAL IMPACT You will be asked to respond to a series of yes/no questions. A `'yes" answer will mean the project could have significant environmental effects. These answers will be reviewed by the Environmental Impact Committee to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report will be required. C. STATEMENT OF NO SIGNIFICANT E VIROI\`ENT L 1 i ECTS You should complete this section only if you answer "yes" to one or more of the questions in Section E, but still believe the project will have no significant environmental effects. D. PDDITIONAL DATA You may be asked to answer other questions and submit additional information to determine whether an EIR is recuired for the project. If required information is not submitted within four (4) months from receipt of written notification by the Planning Department, or an extended period of time acceptable to staff, the application and project shall be considered withdrawn. E. CFRTIFICATION . . You will he asked to certify the truth and accuracy of your statements. INITIAL STUDY (continued) A. Background Information 1. Give a brief description of the proposed project. Include within this discussion the principal engineering proposals. 11+6 I2AJf to-e i 1 ook T(, firm-5Tft iu"1t r3$ 1165n £¢tub F-j- ; 4 wizooms , 2 SToJJE'S rios-i{019c-5 iN- (s SQt4r I. v W tTN STEP 9o7on1 6.1-2A6 2. Describe the environmental setting, including distinguishing natural and man-made characteristics. The discussion should be of the site without (before) the project and include the imme- diate areas surrounding the site.. cttasecr ►S A 1-i,(Q0 k- covr-}21AYE) 201,2- AC.(tig , iifE MO ECT It;iLtr l.UI(lam) CrietST, `Clh krATt Matt, GYy 1249'ko svidIDtkfz.O . A wCATlifi;. Efov i ko/4 0:1- &i i-/MATim�) tuli 5 A G�t,�l� ay cary cvu� M t� puO�IG y ��`�ti Pint fGry e�iDiiAiPo CM i TS A j-{ 'A,2 lob (yn) ilia 0 D CATw''3 GoF TNT 5u bS v&T f p-o ekr y `TlfGt Ai -fit ol) WA-5 S-to t�J s-uoty •ENvt tolomtiv -i_ I "4P4C-T i Poi r sug bf ! Jb� 1260470 C f, w;,, ,,.,JV Q /,4. - s) i Z7 mwr nA fnAM, p (i;6-o, cA q 2.110 o D INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space in Column A. Specific Questions 1. Does the project significantly change the present use of the project area? (The project area includes the im- mediate location of the project, as well as more remote areas that may be directly or indirectly affected by construction and/or operation of the project.) 2. Does the project alter any unique, natural or manmade features? 3. Does the project affect the conser- vation of any natural or scenic re- sources or scarce natural resources? 4. Does the project alter the biological habitat of flora, fauna or endangered species? 5. Does the project alter or change ex- isting features of any ocean, beach, estuary, bay or tidelands? 6. Does the project alter the land form of topography in excess of 25 percent? 7. Will the project contribute= to in- crease flooding? 8. Will the project increase the possi- bility of erosion or sedimentation? 9. Does the project involve any geologi- cal hazards? 10. Will the project increase the possi- bility of earth slippage? Column A Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No ✓I 11. Will the project contribute advers- ly to the quality of air? INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A 12. Will the project affect the use of existing or proposed recreational areas? 13. Will the project affect areas of his- toric, archaeological or aesthetic value? (The setting of such sites includes surrounding areas, the nature of which are important to the under- standing and enjoyment of the site itself.) 14. Will the project accelerate the dev- elopment of adjoining non -urban areas? (Examples include the introduction of facilities such as streets, roads, water mains or sewerage lines in such a manner as to facilitate development or intensification of the use of an area.) 15. Will the project tax the City's or other agency's ability to provide necessary facilities? 16. Will the project require any variance from existing environmental standards (air, water, noise)? 17. Will the project alter the character of existing communities? (Examples in- clude, but are not limited to: Changes in traffic patterns Effects on access within the com- munity to commercial establish- ments, schools, parks, etc. Introduction of activities not presently found within the community.) 18. Is the land use proposed by the pro- ject in opposition to the City's ex- isting plans, programs, and policies? Yes Maybe No Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A Column B 19. Will the project require a change in zone, adopted community or general plan? 20. Does the project require any variation from existing codes and ordinances? 21. Will the project significantly change the average population density of the community? 22. Will the project alter the lifestyle of the community? 23. Will the project result in overcrowding, a lack of privacy for adjoining develop- ment within the community? 24. Will the project alter or eliminate views? 25. Will the project reduce solar access or opportunities for passive heating and cooling on the site or on nearby property or result in other effects on climate or micro -climate? 26. Will the project result in increased light or glare? 27. Will the project alter or limit access to public facilities or recreational resources? 28. Will the project affect existing transportation systems? 29. Will the project affect the existing utility networks? 30. Will the project affect the existing community facilities or city services? 31. Does the project involve the demolition or removal of existing improvements? Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No V 7 INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A 32. Does the project alter or improve the employment base of the community? Yes Maybe No 33. Could the project significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conser- vation of a scarce natural resource? (Ex- amples include, but are not limited to: Developments which effectively pre- clude the extraction of the region's rock, sand, gravel, or other mineral resources. Uses which effectively preclude the multiple use of regional natural resources in scarce supply. Activities which tend to diminish the supply or availability of regional natural resources that are in scarce supply.) 34. Are any of the natural or manmade fea- tures in the project area unique, that is not found in other parts of the City, County, State, or nation? (Unique features include those areas, structures, biological phenomena, etc., that exhibit distinguish- ing characteristics not found in other areas, or, only in a small number of other areas. Such features can be either good or bad for human health, safety, comfort, or conveniences.) 7 Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No ENVIRCN1WTAL ASS_SSi•ENT STATEh1ENT (continued) C. STATE - ENT OF NO SIGNIFICANT U1VIROD?!`•INTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section E, but still think the project will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. Attach additional pages, if necessary. In &w✓ IRA as , 5 ) rroj A Nf6AT(VV 9 it)2ATceA) i . ft P ov�0 S� '6 9k c4.4 vn v V AL e) D. ADDITIONAL DATA 1. If there are any Army Corps of Engineers or other Governmental Agency public notices or permit numbers applirAhle to this project, cite them and give dates. fvnESE 2. Estimate the amount of grading in cubic yards. Doo i.lidlAn3 1N Trl t?11U£ MA? IS PreaLIMEn-ft(lf 4-A1J lip fLt v1 1 01* Mtn g-R 3 92.0G : Vc.eArATton) : 41, 15V c Y. 40,00,-o cot, 3. What are the maximum heights of nen-made slopes, etc. t >vu -wf W Si-v-p s id to To 20 F'►", thGA cu rUU Cie untm. cr Tt2.uc7-, o .3 E. CFRTLFIC TION I hereby acknowledge that the above Environmental Assessment Statement is true and accurate to the best of Ey knowledge. Date Date 41,J Ni lo* Signed Signer' Person wh ileted. this .; pplication WI - 10 o G. krib ilex 427(, Ail MI itb�tr� crty, C coq.5z) NATIONAL CITY PLANAING.DEPT. EXHIBITS-visfan CASE FILE NO. S 9" — DATE: 7/ TENTATIVE MAP - PARADISE KNOLL r.7777.-7 HILLS OF PARADISE MAP NO. 1880 I. I -7:117. i - , .4...—...-, IN lia IN go ......, I▪ /1 , . . ...... ..., I le Ile ii., MO 2611 =nom "A -A' Lo—Tri Wox... - La I'Ve .0 4 Aft HILLS OF PARADISE MAP NC. I alio • A.4 Id / Zn. § TYPICAL MEET SECTIONS LEGAL DESCRIPTION. /WR M RIM Of N WA • 111111Wolir IF 110111L elL WM (Itn_ Sr 111 11 WrIWOW as MI, um RAM/ W A lit MAI MAUL IL 1110. 7,41 m„..1"011111 EMU MI OM IR VIM tar U. law AIL EOM X MAT A= Pei it GENERAL NOTES k BrarailtAreaff a. ISA WM Allit isir) 1. 0 WO 110) 4. FlIWW) VII MUM! I MOM VOIL I /AIM WS MWIW01112 NEM I MB 7. W ii I. L II 011111EVILAMI 11•111r46•111111•1 IL Prataritigif . M saw. mi. MR . U. AL IM giniall MO Alaire. IA W.NUC MA Kai OA H. Ina W1M1110 A NM AL NAL MOO AL SOL IOW 11111101 mu to MA MO 111111•1111111111 MIS= LAM 011111LE r U. OM Alla LA 5 V On • sem p. FI•6 Dania ITN SMELT V. UTILmLTIES wet. Cilf ARM LORIS Cif WM. art 111111111111 RAM IL AlasmoWAII MWOW OM IC an AOL 111 LEGEND =Pia- - moo OMNI —0-- = E NOM MOM MOM SW eel SE" VICINITY MAP MX 11 VMS 2nd FLOOR PLAN NATIONAL CITY PLANNING OEP1. I.mi. _.._. CASE FILE NO. 7.7F9'- DATE: 3%9 1st FLOOR PLAN PLAN 99 LOTS 1, 2, 3, 5, 6. 11 gammima t r EL AAP' �kt'.1.1.1'� nitttttNtt/Ntt„j ♦ I ■■ �'l' w 1111 5i1I ■ am - tip■■ I 1 *We.-SM.W.fV Ii. S itl •�t•ftL� J, NM NM MI MIN IMO MISMICOITI. ®If I lMO a a' reel ..,. FRONT ELEVATION N•— tH fn/iulnluullnulltN/u OlY►. +/I111/11tt1111111/11111111g11111t1111111111111 .N1hl1111/IIII I IIIIIOIIIIIp11O1111111O1t1111 ..t+•44,r r— Srrr ru GSZ2C 640 LNU OYLE 114/4 LEFT SIDE ELEVATION _ItN�V' ;M tttttpl•"y non //Bt;t tNNNtlmum UMtt I I I : l_ . I I • Z• /Y�i'G� ez YfNJS REAR ELEVATION RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ELEVATION A PLAN 99 • Mb' FRONT ELEVATION ASWP 41fe. £ASYCN s!nte ^i a'c' Wyk,' M p�l��-NIIYt� REAR ELEVATION SMIK ANZ-s/' 2.4w Off—'c 7T. G/• 7rAs wer f sroo� Y 4 ■" tiro Ill' E.VI. t/7iiZ SibSIN LEFT SIDE ELEVATION ■..■ f... nttrrtti I�rttt w�.+..' rttlOhtBO I U runt inrnue.mIrNI 1✓ -444-.414 RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION —r ELEVATION B PLAN 99 • _.. 2nd FLOOR, PLAN 1st FLOOR PLAN PLAN 99-5 LOTS 4, 7, 0, 9, 10 '1RTNERSHIP n • <01 OM ,.lar%tll III P-r - ,, Aias1Il�.MErOr-�fr in.. _ �a' p.�,.GNmurr ��r,,ulrewr■rrrrtr. - _._.. v�. ham.-•nrwrun.. �.- r�ULU ;I�iri7�nuw u1raunnlnluuul111I1I1.3. -327?cs'/- d, Y.rre toe ozo. '• .41Z6+14e aye FRONT ELEVATION 0 Pe -/el r/14/1 1 r G.I. OF srlEKGGGC Aeg 14 e II 'I111"i li thr� .,0 REAR ELEVATION f „' MEMO La Apr MEIN NMI a I 9 I LEFT SIDE ELEVATION alhommiummC n /Aiii1/-elf n u� rn1' r nnr.iuiu. Imam ■Gi■ ;ir■ Ilia• ,ci ti RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION IL ELEVATION A PLAN 99-S 6LI;,l I: dlllll 'y•'=S .�filAiinittttll► j�` n/Itn J�V.;•-: �dGumunu.��' yr"�sr.. nrr r Os+e..sse Ztor ii —15 Y Mr►rrl►n.i� luuunnnWiT-s NIII INSEJ.q, lull in asll imml ammiirh. III. ❑�� hP/ Ili■ � i.r - IT :-.:.:...a ° um ow aim aim sigh Iimmi iiiiirimmi OgmriL 444,0 M J'L4& , P q— ONT ELEVATION Ali..aMMAMyM 5 ..clMlrlarllrYrMM�laaiMil.. ��iiiiiflwl�iIn MOM a � piif� .1 DO j REAR ELEVATION fey 0' IIY;4 �lflluIIHulUOMrllrlrllIOw INMlairo hoc qu oc LEFT SIDE ELEVATION ...14 .,».....y, • i 1 ten+: crwz — RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION ELEVATION B PLAN 99-S t City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE 10/12/99 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #14 PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE EXPLANATION. RATIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER #14 PER GOVERNMENT SECTION CODE 37208. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. TAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $237,791.82 BOARD/ COMMISSION COMMENDATION TT CHMENTS (Listed Below) 1. Warrant Register #14 2. Workers' Comp Warrant Register dated 09/29/99 Resolution No. A-100 (Rev. 9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE October 12, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 / ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 801 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD. CASE FILE NO. CUP-1999-5 APPLICANT: AT&T WIRELESS PREPARED BY Ron Santos — Assistant Planner EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Planning AT&T Wireless requests authorization to install equipment for wireless communications on the roof and exterior walls of the Radisson Suites. Proposed equipment includes 3 antenna arrays mounted on the exterior walls of the hotel - one array per wall, mounted approximately 116 feet above the ground. Each array includes 4 antennas. Each antenna measures 6.2 feet long and 5.5 wide, and would be painted to match the building. Antennas would be spaced 5 feet apart and project 18 inches from the wall. In addition, several equipment cabinets are proposed on the roof of the hotel, behind the existing parapet walls. The proposed facility would be co -located with two previously approved wireless communication facilities at the site, one of which included wall mounted panel antennas. Planning Commission voted to approve the application at the September 20, 1999 meeting, citing satisfaction with efforts to create a "stealth", co -location installation. The applicant spoke in favor of the application. No other testimony from the public was received. Environmental Review Financial Statement X N/A N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to approve the application. Vote: Ayes -- unanimous ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Resolution 7-99 2. Location Map Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 7-99 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON A VACANT LOT EAST OF 801 NATIONAL CITY BOULVARD APPLICANT: AT&T WIRELESS CASE FILE NO. CUP-1999-5 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit application for a wireless communications facility at 801 National City Boulevard at a duly advertised public hearing held on September 20, 1999 at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. CUP-1999-5, which is maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on September 20, 1999 support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since sufficient space exists on the rooftop and exterior walls to accommodate the proposed equipment. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since access to the property is provided along E. 8th Street and the unmanned communications facility is expected to generate a minimal amount of additional traffic. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the project involves only installation of screened equipment cabinets and small antennas, painted to minimize visual impacts and installed at a considerable height above normal street level perspectives, in a commercial zone. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the facility will enhance and/or augment the availability of wireless communication channels. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted for Building Permits must conform with the 1998 California Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical and Energy Codes. 2. The proposed antennas and equipment cabinets shall be painted a non -reflective color matching that of the surface to which they are attached. 3. The permittee shall not object to co -locating additional facilities of other communication companies and sharing the project site, provided such shared use does not result in substantial technical or quality -of -service impairment for the permitted use. In the event a dispute arises with regard to co -locating with other existing or potential users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant or the complaining user. This condition in no way obligates the City to approve any co -location proposal if it is determined by the City not to be desirable in a specific case. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a report, prepared by an engineer, which quantifies the project's radio frequency exposures and compares them to FCC adopted standards. 5. Antennas and equipment authorized by this Conditional Use Permit shall be removed by the applicant upon discontinued use for a period of six or more consecutive months. 6. Use of the property as authorized by this Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to the installation of wireless communications antennas and associated equipment, installed in conformance with Exhibit A -Revised, Case File No. CUP-1999-5, dated 08/05/99. 7. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and property owner shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. 8. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the National City Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and fmal on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of October 4, 1999, by the following vote: AYES: UNGAB, LARGE, VALDERRAMA, GODSEALK, PARRA, MARTINELLI NAYS: ABSENT: DETZER ABSTAIN: 7.2ia401,11 111 W 7th ST. rY4) 712 7i0 nQ1u4 n430•321 �W.8thmmm' STREET o � 8 1 130 , 129 p �140 1 MLR ,2/ 201 92547 929Y/ ,3,-4/ 943 HOC SO/ q0 1/2 122 124 121 w 6 ,, 140 /03/ /040 PROJECT SITE SCALE: 1 •:200' BOULEVARD: RADISSON HOTEL LOCATION MAP 3� mu ZONE BOUNDARY CUP-1999-5 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE -rz.-t REVISIONS ►1-7-9b