HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 09-07 CC AGENDA PKTCtiA
AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING
NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 - 3:00 P.M.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO
THE CITY CLERK
IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR
CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY
MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO
KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY THE CITY MANAGER, TOM G.
MCCABE
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 24,
1999.
COUNCIL AGENDA
9/7/99 Page 2
MAYOR'S PRESENTATION
Employee Recognition - Charles Palomino, Fire Captain
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters which are of a routine
or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a
single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed
from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a
Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public.
1. Resolution No. 99-130
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving Council
Policy update on the City of National City Investment Policy. (Finance)
2. Resolution No. 99-131
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City
Manager to submit the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant application to the
US. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance and to sign Grant
Award Agreement and all grant related documents. (Police)
3. Resolution No. 99-132
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City
Manager to execute an Agreement with the law firm of Liebert, Cassidy &
Frierson to provide special legal services pertaining to employee relations
matters. (Personnel)
COUNCIL AGENDA
9/7/99 Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
4. Resolution No. 99-133
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor
to execute a renewal Agreement with Commonwealth Energy Corporation and a
"Greenpower Addendum" to the Agreement. (Public Works)
5. Resolution No. 99-134
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a time
extension for Conditional Use Permit No. 1998-4 granted to GTE Mobilnet of
San Diego for a wireless communications facility at 2005 East 4th Street (El
Toyon Park). (Planning)
6. WARRANT REGISTER #08 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $268,675.87.
7. WARRANT REGISTER #09 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $7,187,279.70.
8. Consolidated Cash and Investment Report as of June 30, 1999 (Finance)
9. Street Tree Committee Minutes. (Parks & Recreation)
10. Claim for Damages: Gloria Norvell (City Clerk)
COUNCIL AGENDA
9/7/99 Page 4
NON CONSENT RESOLUTION
11. Resolution No. 99-135
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor
to execute an Agreement with Don Iler, AIA, for a space needs analysis and
site review of the headquarters fire station. (Fire)
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
12. A letter from PCEPI President, Ted A. Godshalk, regarding a grant opportunity
with U.S. EPA and requesting that the Parks & Recreation Director write the
letter for the application package.
NEW BUSINESS
- CITY MANAGER
-* CITY ATTORNEY
-* OTHER STAFF
--> MAYOR
CITY COUNCIL
13. SB 207 Infrastructure financing districts: border zone. (Councilman
Beauchamp)
COUNCIL AGENDA
9/7/99 Page 5
NEW BUSINESS (Cont.)
14. SB 664 San Diego ferry service: San Diego -Coronado. (Councilman
Beauchamp)
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit)
NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back
on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or
urgent nature.
CLOSED SESSIONS
Conference with Labor Negotiators - Government Code Section 54957.6.
Agency Designated Representatives - Dan Cassidy and Roger De Fratis
Employee Organization: Police Officers' Association
Agency Designated Representatives - Roger DeFratis, Brenda Hodges, and
Jim Ruiz
Employee Organization: Municipal Employees' Association
ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular City Council Meeting - September 14, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. -
Council Chambers, Civic Center.
TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO
IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Office of the Mayor
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526
George H. Waters - Mayor
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1999
TO: COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MAYOR GEORGE H. WATERS
SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
The following City employee will complete thirty-five years of service with the City of
National City on September 14, 1999:
NAME: CHARLES PALOMINO
POSITION: FIRE CAPTAIN
HIRED: SEPTEMBER 14, 1964
In honor of his service to our community, Mr. Palomino will be recognized at the
Council meeting on September 7, 1999.
GEORGE H. WATERS
MAYOR
GHW:nu
cc: TOM McCABE, CITY MANAGER
CHARLES PALOMINO, FIRE CAPTAIN
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR
® Recycled Paper
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE 4Pptmbar 7, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1
ITEMTITLE Resolution Approving Council Policy Update On The City o
National City Investment Policy.
PREPARED BY Marylou Matienzo
Director of Finance
EXPLANATION.
DEPARTMENT Finance
City Council Policy Number 203 provides that the City'
Investment Policy be reviewed annually. Per Council
direction, investment policy updates are incorporated
City Council Policy. This year's policy incorporated
changes to the policy adopted last year dated October
as follows: (Please see attachment)
s
into our
some
6, 1998
Environmental Review N / A
Financial Statement Applicable
Account No.
STAFF RECO ENDATION
Staff recommends to adopt the resolution approving the updated
policy for inclusion in the Policy manual and amend the
investment policy adopted by Council on October 23, 1990
BOARD/COMMISSIO RECOMMENDATION ;,✓"r) -) -7
6
L
Not Applicable
TT.==:CHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. Resolution
2. Updated Investment Policy
3. Summary of Revisions
Resolution No 99-130
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
REVISIONS TO THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY INVESTMENT POLICY
1. PAGE 4 OF 13
Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions
Added: In addition, a list will also be maintained of approved security brokers/
Dealers selected by credit worthiness with at least five years of
operation.
2. PAGE 5 OF 13
Eligible Investments
Added: Investment of funds in approved & registered financial institutions.
Added: The "Prudent Rule Investor" shall apply under certain market conditions
to go beyond 2 years if the instrument has a callable, transferable,
negotiable feature in which maturity would fall within the limits of the
California Government Code Section.
3. PAGE 13 OF 13
5.0 Investment Portfolio
Changed: 5.1 Preparation of investment report
Sr. Accountant
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 130
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
111E CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING
COUNCIL POLICY UPDATE ON THE CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY INVESTMENT POLICY
WHEREAS, City Council Policy Number 203 provides that the City's Investment
Policy be reviewed annually; and
WHEREAS, the Finance Director has recommended certain revisions to said
policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City approves revisions to the City's investment policy, as recommended by the Finance
Director.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1999.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED:
OCTOBER 23, 1990
AMENDED OR
REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 19!
Purpose
Page l of 13
To provide broad guidelines to the officers of the City charged with the
responsibility for investment of temporarily idle funds.
Policy
Temporarily idle funds will be invested in a manner which will provide the
highest investment return with the maximum security while meeting the
daily cash flow demands of the City and conforming to all state and local
statutes governing the investment of idle funds.
Scope
This policy applies to all financial assets of the City accounted for in the
City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report and any new fund created
by the City Council, unless specifically exempted.
Standard of Prudence
Investments shall be made in context of the "Prudent Investor" rule, which
states that:
"Investments shall be made with judgment and care, under
circumstances then prevailing, which persons of prudence,
discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their
own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the
probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to
be derived."
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER203
ADOPTED:
AMENDED OR
OCTOBER:23, 1990 REVISED:SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 2 of 13
This standard of prudence shall be applied in the context of managing an
overall portfolio. Investment officers acting in accordance with written
procedures and the investment policy and exercising due diligence shall be
relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or
market price changes provided deviations from expectations are reported
in a timely fashion and appropriate action is take to control adverse
developments.
Objective
The primary objectives, in priority order, of the City's investment activities
shall be:
Safety: Safety of principal is the foremost objective of the
investment program. Investments of the City shall be undertaken in
a manner that seeks to ensure the preservation of capital in the
overall portfolio. To attain this objective, diversification is required
in order that potential losses on individual securities do not exceed
the income generated from the remainder of overall portfolio.
Liquidity: The City's investment portfolio will remain sufficiently
liquid to enable the City to meet all operating requirements which
might be reasonably anticipated.
Return on investment: The City's investment portfolio shall be
designed with the objective of attaining a market rate of return
throughout budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account
the City's investment risk constraints and the cash flow
characteristics of the portfolio.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED: AMENDED OR
OCTOBER.:23, 1990 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 3 of 13
Delegation of Authority
Management responsibility for the investment program is hereby delegated
to the Finance Director, who shall establish written procedures for the
operation of the investment program consistent with the investment policy.
Procedures should include reference to : safekeeping, PSA repurchase
agreements, wire transfer agreements, collateral/depository agreements
and banking service contracts. Such procedures shall include explicit
delegation of authority of persons responsible for investment transactions.
No person may engage in an investment transaction except as provided
under the terms of this policy and the procedures established by the
Finance Director. The Finance Director shall be responsible for all
transactions undertaken and shall establish a system of controls to
regulate the activities of subordinate officials.
Ethics and Conflicts of Interest
Officers and employees involved in the investment process shall refrain
from personal business activity that could conflict with proper execution of
the investment program, or which could impair their ability to make
impartial investment decisions. Employees and investment officials shall
disclose to the City Manager any material financial interest in financial
institutions that conduct business with the City, and they shall further
disclose any large personal financial investment positions that could be
related to the performance of the city's portfolio. Employees and officers
shall subordinate their personal investment transactions to those of the
City, particularly with regard to the time of purchases and sales.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER 203
ADOP I'EU: AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990
REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 4 of 13
Authorized Financial Dealers and Institutions
The Finance Director will maintain a list of financial institutions authorized
to provide investment services. Investments will be placed with SEC
registered broker dealers only. In addition, a list will also be maintained of
approved security broker/dealers selected by credit worthiness with at least
five years of operation. These may include "primary" dealers or regional
dealers that qualify under Securities & Exchange commission Rule 15C3-1
(uniform net capital rule). No public deposit shall be made except in a
qualified public depository as established by state laws.
An annual review of the financial condition and registrations of qualified
bidders will be conducted by the Finance Director. A current financial
statement to be submitted annually is required to be on file for each
financial institution and broker/dealer in which the City invests
The Finance Director shall provide a current edition of the Investment
Policy to all dealers/brokers which have been previously approved to
handle investment transactions. Receipt of the policy, including
confirmation that it has been reviewed by persons handling the City's
account should be acknowledged in writing prior to commencing to trade.
Authorized and Suitable Investments
Security purchases and holdings shall be maintained within statutory limits
imposed by the Government Code. The Finance Director will maintain a
list of permissible investments and the current limits for each type of
investment.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER203
ADOPTED:
OCTOBER 23, 1990
AMENDED OR
REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 5 of 13
ELIGIBLE INVESTMENTS
Investments may be made in securities which are permissible investments
under the California Government Code, as they now read or may hereafter
be amended, from money in the treasury not required for the immediate
necessities of the City.
The following are the criteria for eligible investments:
1. All investments of the City shall have the City of National City
as the registered owner and shall be kept in the custody of
the City or by a qualified safekeeping institution.
2. Investments shall be diversified among institutions, types of
securities and maturates to maximize safety and yield with
changing market conditions.
3. Investment of funds in approved & registered financial intitutions.
4. Investments should have a final maturity of 2 years to reduce any
Interest rate risk of fund. The "Prudent Rule Investor" shall apply
under certain market conditions to go beyond 2 years if the
instrument has a callable, transferable, negotiable feature in which
maturity would fall within the limits of the California government
Code section.
5. No derivatives will be allowed in the fund, including inverse
Floaters, Range Notes, Interest only strips from CMO's or Any
security that could result in zero interest accrual if held to
maturity.
6. Permissible Investments as allowed in Government Codes
53601. 53635 53637 53652 and 43653 ara ac fnllnwc•
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
1'11'LE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED: AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 6 of 14
GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS consisting of U.S. Treasury and Agency
obligations which are issued at the federal level. U.S. Treasury
obligations are bills, notes and bonds issued by the Treasury and are
direct obligations of the Federal Government. Agency obligations are
notes and bonds of Federal Agencies, Government Sponsored Enterprises
and International institutions. Agencies are not the direct obligation of the
Treasury but involve federal sponsorship or guarantees . The maximum
maturity shall be 2 years with a minimum credit requiremnt of AAA which
all U.S. Treasuries and Agencies are currently rated. The maximum
exposure shall be no more than 10% of the portfolio value.
BANKER'S ACCEPTANCE is a draft or bill of exchange accepted by a
bank or trust company and brokered to investors in the secondary market.
The maximum maturity of an issue will be 270 days. Issuers must be at or
above the following investment grade from the rating firms of Fitch - F1,
Moody's - P1 (A when applicable), Standard and Poor's -Al (A when
applicable). The maximum exposure shall be no more than 5% of the
portfolio value.
COMMERCIAL PAPER are short-term, unsecured obligations issued by
firms in the open market. Commercial paper (CP) is generally backed by a
bank credit facility, guarantee/ bond of indemnity or some other support
agreement. The maximum maturity of an issue shall be 180 days. Issuers
must be at or above the following investment grade form one of these
rating firms: Fitch - F1, Moody's - P1 (A when applicable), Standard and
Poor's - Al (A when applicable). The maximum exposure shall be no more
than 15% of the portfolio value.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE: POLICY
INVESTMENTS
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED: AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 7 of 13
NEGOTIABLE, TRANSFERABLE, OR DIRECT CERTIFICATES OF
DEPOSIT are issued by FDIC insured commercial banks and thrift
institutions funds deposited for specified periods of time and earn
either a fixed or variable interest rate. the maximum maturity of an
issue will be generally be no more than 1 year on new investments.
Certain exceptions can be made upon the discretion of the Finance
Director. The certificate of deposit is issued by a federally insured
bank or credit union and must be "well capitalized" as that term
referred to in the FDIC Rules and Regulations. Issuers must be at
or above the following investment grade from the rating firms Fitch -
CD or AA, Moody's - P1 or Aa, Standard and Poor's - Al or AA.
Issued is limited up to $100,000 with a total maximum exposure at
10% of the portfolio value.
LOCAL AGENCY INVESTMENT FUND (LAIF) is a pooled
investment fund with the state agency. This is a liquid investment
that has no maximum maturity and an investment Cap of 30 million
for each participant.
The Finance Director shall have the authority to adjust the investment
portfolio percent distribution and maximum maturities depending on certain
market conditions in accordance to the terms of the government codes.
Collateralization
To secure active or inactive deposits, the amount of securities placed with
agent depository shall at all times be maintained as specified in California
Government Code 53652 and pursuant to Section 53656 and 53658. The
Finance Director is authorized to waive collateral for certificates of deposits
to the extent of FDIC or FSLIC insurance coverage.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED: AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990
REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 8 of 13
Marketable securities which are provided under a repurchase agreement
shall be held by the City's safekeeping agent at a market value greater
than 100%. Request for collateral substitutions and releases are subject
to the Finance Director's approval.
Safekeeping and Custody
All security transactions, including collateral for repurchase agreements,
entered into by the City shall be conducted on a delivery -versus -payment
(DVP) basis. Securities will be held in a third party custodian/safekeeping
account. Said securities shall be held in a manner that establishes the
City's right of ownership.
Diversification
The City will diversify its investments by security type and institution. With
the exception U.S. Treasury securities and the Local Agency Investment
Fund pool, no investment may be made that would, as of the date a
particular investment is being considered, result in having more than 15%
of the City's total investment portfolio being invested in a single security
type or with a single financial institution.
Maximum Maturities
To the extent possible, the City will attempt to match its investments with
anticipated cash flow requirements. Unless matched to a specific cash
flow, the City will not directly invest in securities maturing more than five
years from the date of purchase without specific approval by the City
Council. The maturity of such investments shall be made to coincide as
nearly as practicable with expected use of the funds.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER
ADOPTED: AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 9 of 13
Internal Control
A system of internal control shall be maintained to prevent losses arising
from fraud, employee error, misrepresentation of third parties,
unanticipated changes in financial markets, or imprudent actions by
employees and officers of the City. Controls deemed most important
include: control of collusion, separation of duties, clear delegation of
authority, written confirmation of transactions initiated by telephone, and
documentation of transactions.
The matrix of segregation of responsibilities of investment functions shown
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herewith shall be
implemented and adhered to.
Non -Discrimination
The City shall not knowingly make any investment in any financial
institution and broker/dealers that practices or supports directly or indirectly
through its actions discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color,
creed, national or ethnic origin, age, sex, or physical disability.
Performance Standards
The investment portfolio will be designed to obtain a market average rate
of return during budgetary and economic cycles, taking into account the
City's investment risk constraints and cash flow needs. The basis to be
used by the Finance Director whether market yields are being achieved
shall be the twelve-month average of the six months Treasury Bills.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED: AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Page 10 of 13
Allocation of Investment Income
Investment income shall be allocated to the General Fund unless
otherwise directed by law. Any statutory allocations to restricted funds
shall be made in proportion to the ratio of restricted fund balances to the
total pooled balances.
Reporting
The Finance Director shall render a monthly report to the City Council and
City Manager showing the following information:
1. Type of investment.
2. Name of financial institution.
3. Date of deposit.
4. Date of maturity.
5. Amount of deposit or carrying cost of the security.
6. Current market value for all securities with a maturity of more
than 12 months.
7. The rate of interest.
8. A statement relating the report to the investment policy.
9. A statement that the City's expenditure requirements can be met
in the following month.
10. At the end of each fiscal year, a schedule comparing the
investment portfolio performance against the established
benchmark.
A written confirmation of investments shall be issued by the seller or
purchaser of the security confirming the transaction. Items included in the
confirmation are the name of security (CUSIP number when applicable),
interest rate or coupon, maturity date, purchase or selling price, accrued
interest if applicable, settlement date and any additional information fully
describing the security.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER203
ADOPTED: OCTOBER 23, 1990
Policy Review
AMENDED OR
REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
Puyrl of 13
This investment policy shall be reviewed at least annually to ensure its
consistency with the overall objectives of preservation of principal, liquidity,
and return, and its relevance to current law and financial and economic
trends. Amendments to the policy shall be forwarded to the City Manager
and the City Council.
Review of activities by outside independent auditors is required to make
sure that there is conformity to the investment policy and that reconciliation
of the Treasurer's accounts has been performed. the auditors should
confirm all investment holdings.
Related Policy References
Resolution No. 95-62
Resolution No. 15,806
Resolution No. 96-130
Resolution No. 97-110
Resolution No. 98-136
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
111'LE:
INVESTMENTS
POLICY
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED:
AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
City of National City
Investments Functions
Segregation of Responsibilities
FUNCTION
1.0 Invest Policy:
1.1 Preparation and annual review of
Investment policy.
1.2 Approval of Investment Policy.
2.0 Investment Transactions:
2.1 Calculation of Cash position.
2.2 Investment recommendation:
Determination of amount to be
invested, selection of type of
investment and term of investment.
2.3 Review of Investment recommendation
and execution of transaction.
3.0 Recording of transactions:
3.1 In Investment subsidiary ledgers.
3.2 In accounting records.
3.3 Match Investment confirmation to
subsidiary ledgers.
4.0 Safeguarding of assets and records:
4.1 Reconciliation of subsidiary records
to the accounting records.
4.2 Reconciliation of subsidiary records
to bank statements and safekeeping
records.
4.3 Review of financial Institutions and
investment brokers' reputation and
financial condition.
rage IG of la
RESPONSIBILITY
Finance Director
City Council
Finance Director
Finance Director
City Treasurer
Finance Director
Finance Director
Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Finance Director
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
INVESTMENTS
NUMBER 203
ADOPTED:
AMENDED OR
OCTOBER 23, 1990 REVISED: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999
4.4 Review of collaterals.
4.5 Control, follow up and caluculation
of interest earnings.
4.6 Review and calculation of applicable
fees, discounts, premiums, commissions
and other costs associated with placing
investments.
4.7 Maintain a separate file for each
investment banker and broker authorized
to do business with the City.
4.8 Distribute and secure acknowledgements
of the City's investment policy from
authorized banks and brokers.
4.9 Review the audited financial statements
submitted by the investment brokers on
an annual basis.
4.10 Gather data of comparable investment
rates on a daily basis for the Finance
Director's review
4.11 Review the status of investment banks
through the Financial Services
Information
5.0 Investment portfolio:
5.1. Preparation of investment report.
5.2 Review of portfolio for compliance with
stated investment policy
5.3 Approval of Investment Report
Page 13 of 13
City Treasurer
Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Accountant
Sr. Accountant
Finance Director
City Council
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE September 7, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
iITE TITLE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO su± r'il1LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
JUSTICE BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE AND TO SIGN GRANT AWARD
AGREEMENT AND ALL GRANT RELATED DOCUMENTS.
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT /l!
EPLe4 AIENANT MIKE IGLESIAS POLICE DEPARTMENT
On July 22, 1999, the National City Police Department received an
application package for a federal grant known as the Local Law
Enforcement Block Grant Program. These grants are administered by
the U.S. Department of Justice and are similar in many respects to
CDBG funds in that they are awarded to local governments who have
a significant amount of flexibility in deciding how the funds are
to be expended. Like CDBG funding, only a general categorical
description and not specific plans on how the money will be
expended needs to be submitted to the federal government in order
to receive the funds. Local governments, cities and counties, are
eligible for Law Enforcement Block Grant funds. The amount of Local
Law Enforcement Block Grant funds that each city is eligible for is
based upon the population and the crime rate according to the FBI
Uniform Crime Reports.
National City received $183,809 in FY 98/99 Local Law Enforcement
Block grant funding last year. Based upon the same formula, the
City of National City is eligible to apply for $198,757 in FY
1999/00 Loral Rnfnrrement Block grant funds. (cont)
Environmental Review xx N/A
Financial Statement
The local match for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant award will be $19,876.
There should be no fiscal impact to the budget as the Police Department intends to
fund the match with Asset Forfeiture funds.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Resolution.
BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
Acco'nt No.
✓ -tt
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below )
-Local Law Enforcement Block Grant application
-Resolution
Resolution No. 99-131
A-200 (9/80)
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
APPLICATION-1999/00 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT
PAGE 2
The award period for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant would
cover two federal fiscal years, (October 1,1999-September 30, 2001.)
This program requires a 1096 percent local cash match. It is the
intent of the Police Department to fund the local match requirement
with asset forfeiture funds.
One of the provisions of the 1998 Local Enforcement Block grant
program, is that in order to receive full funding, the City of
National City must comply with Section 615, of the Fiscal Year 1998
Appropriations Act: Alu-O'Hara Public Safety Officers Health
Benefits Act which requires entities which employ peace officers to
provide officers who are retired or separated from service due to
injury suffered as a direct and proximate result of a personal
injury sustained in the line of duty while responding to an
emergency situation or hot pursuit, with the same or better level
of health insurance benefits that are paid by the entity at the
time of retirement or separation.
Currently, the City of National City does not provide such health
insurance benefits to peace officers retired under the above
circumstances and is therefore out of compliance with this
provision. As was the case with the Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant Award that the City of National City received last year, this
will result in a 10% reduction of the Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant award, but not a complete disqualification from receiving the
funds.
The reduced Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Award that the City
of National City will likely receive will be approximately
$178,881. The local match for this reduced award will be
approximately $19,876.
The funds under this program may be used for any of the following
purposes.
1. Hiring, training, and employing new law enforcement officers
and necessary support personnel, paying overtime to
presently employed law enforcement officers and support
personnel, and/or procuring equipment, technology, and other
material related to basic law enforcement functions.
2. Enhancing school security and school security measures at any
other facility or location the local government considers to
be at risk for crime.
3. Establishing or supporting drug courts.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
APPLICATION-1999/00 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT
PAGE 3
4. Enhancing the adjudication process of cases involving violent
offenders, including cases involving violent juvenile
offenders.
5. Establishing multi -jurisdictional task forces which work to
prevent and combat crime.
6. Establishing crime prevention programs.
7. Defraying the cost of indemnification or insurance for law
enforcement officers.
The Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds may not be used as
local matching funds for Police Officers hired under the COPS
Universal Hiring Program.
Due to the fact that this is only a two year grant, and personnel
costs are usually long term, funding under this program would be
more appropriate for equipment and technology purchases than for
hiring officers or other personnel. The funding under this program
would be ideal for meeting some of the Police Department's
equipment and technology needs.
The proposed Resolution would authorize the City Manager to submit
the application for Local Law Enforcement Block grant funds for to
the U.S. Department of Justice -Bureau of Justice Assistance and to
sign the grant award and all necessary grant related documents.
In 1997 Council established the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant
Advisory Board consisting of representatives from the police,
prosecutor's office, court system, public schools and a nonprofit,
religious or community group active in crime prevention, drug use
prevention or treatment. As required by federal law, any
applications to Council for the funds must be reviewed by the
Advisory Board which makes non -binding recommendations to Council.
At least one public hearing must be held regarding specific plans
for the use of grant funds.
As with CDBG funds, Council will have the ultimate authority for
approving the specific uses of the Law Enforcement Block grant
funds.
The local advisory board review and public hearings do not need to
be held prior to submission of this application to the federal
government but must be held prior to the Council distributing any
of those funds. It is the intent of the Police Department to
submit a proposal to the Council for specific expenditures of the
Law Enforcement Block grant funds for police equipment/technology
after the city receives the grant award.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-131
RESOLUTION OF'1'HE CITY COUNCIL OF 1'HE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING'1Hle CITY
MANAGER TO SUBMIT THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT
OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE AND
TO SIGN GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT AND
ALL GRANT RELATED DOCUMENTS
WHEREAS, Local Law Enforcement Block Grants are administered by the U.S.
Department of Justice; and
WHEREAS, the amount of Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds that each
city is eligible for is based upon the population and the crime rate according to the FBI Uniform
Crime Reports; and
WHEREAS, last year National City received $183,809 in Local Law Enforcement
Block Grant funding; and
WHEREAS, based on last year's formula, National City is eligible to apply for
$198,757 in Fiscal Year 1999/2000 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby authorizes the City Manager to submit the Local Law Enforcement Block
Grant Application to the U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance and to sign the
Grant Award Agreement and all grant related documents. A copy of the agreement is on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1999.
Al'EST:
Michael R Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
George H. Waters, Mayor
Page 1 of 1
Part II LLEBG
Application
Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Application Fiscal
Year 1999
The following is a printout of your junsdiction's online application for the Fiscal Year 1999
Local Law Enforcement Block Grants (LLEBG) Program. Your jurisdiction's chief executive
officer (or an official delegate) has completed the information listed below and electronically
submitted it to the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) for approval.
Jurisdiction
Name of Jurisdiction:
NATIONAL CITY CITY
Federal Award Amount:
198757
State: CA
Match Amount:
19876
Census ID#:
52037008
OJP Vendor ID#:
956006749
Chief Executive
Officer Information
Name: Tom McCabe
City
Manager��6-4240
Manager
Address: 1243 National City
Boulevard National City, Californi
91950
ph:
619a 3 1 ( )
Y
Programmatic Contact Information
Address: 1200 National City Boulevard
National City, California CA 91950
Name: Michael
Iglesias
Title
Lieutenant
Ph: (619)
336-4508 Y
The Omnibus Fiscal Year 1999 Appropriations Act, Public Law 105-277, provides funds for
the implementation of the LLEBG Program, to be administered by BJA, U.S. Department of
Justice. The purpose of the LLEBG Program is to Provide units of local government with
funds to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve public safety. The LLEBG
Program allows jurisdictions to find criminal justice initiatives in the following seven
purpose areas: supporting law enforcement; enhancing security measures; establishing or
supporting drug courts; enhancing the adjudication of cases involving violent offenders;
establishing multijurisdictional task forces; establishing community crime prevention
programs; and indemnification insurance.
The LLEBG Program is administered by the State and Local Assistance Division, BJA. If
you have any questions, please contact us at (202) 305-2088.
ndicates required
http:Ugrants.ojp.usdoj.gov:8003/gms/plsgl/llebg_main pkg.certified
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATE ENT
MEETING DATE September 7, 1999
AGENDA ITEM NO, 3
r ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO RENEW AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE LAW FIRM OF LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON TO PROVIDE SPECIAL
SERVICES PERTAINING TO EMPLOYMENT RELATION MA LEERS
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
Roger DeFrati Personnel
EXPLANATION.
The proposed action would extend for an eleventh year the Agreement with Liebert,
Cassidy & Frierson under which that firm is retained for assistance on employee relation
matters. The previous Agreement expired on August 31, 1999. The new contract year
would run from September 1, 1999 through August 31, 2000.
Under the proposed Agreement, similar services would be provided at no increase in
retainer costs. Funds are budgeted in the 1999-00 budget.
This service has proven to be highly effective and useful during the previous term of the
Agreement by providing City access as needed to a labor relations legal specialist who is
familiar with National City.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
Total fee of $20,000 is budgeted.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
TT LCHMENTS (Listed Below)
Proposed Resolution
Proposed Agreement
001-409-000-213
Account N
Resolution No
99-132
A-20o (Rey. 9/80)
RESOLUTION NO. 99-132
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE
AN AGREEMENT WITH THE LAW FIRM OF
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON TO PROVIDE
SPECIAL LEGAL SERVICES PERTAINING
TO EMPLOYEE RELATIONS MATTERS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the
City Manager is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with the law firm of
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON to provide special legal services pertaining to
employee relations matters. Said agreement is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1999.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON
6033 West Century Boulevard, Suite 601
Los Angeles, California 90045-6410
tel 310-645-6492 fax 310-337-0837
email Icfa@aol.com
49 Stevenson Street, Suite 1050
San Francisco, California 94105-2909
tel 415-546-6100 fax 415-546-6831
email lcfsf@aol.com
August 19, 1999
Park Morse
Assistant City Manager
City of National City
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, CA 92050-4397
Re: Agreement for Special Services
Dear Mr. Morse:
Enclosed please find the Agreement for Special Services between the City of National City
and our Firm. Our current Agreement with the City expires on August 31, 1999. Please have the
Agreement executed and return a signed copy to this office for our records.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON
Enclosure
34545.1
By
Melanie M. Poturica
Managing Partner
A Professional Law Corporation
ANNUAL RETAINER AGREEMENT FOR SPECIAL SERVICES
This Agreement is entered into this
day of , 1999, between the
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, A Municipal Corporation (hereinafter "City") and the law firm of
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON, A Professional Corporation (hereinafter "Attorney").
WHEREAS City desires to retain expert representation and consulting services to assist
City in its relations and negotiations with its employee organisations; and
WHEREAS Attorney is specially experienced and qualified to perform the services desired
by the City and is willing to perform such services:
NOW, THEREFORE, City and Attorney agree as follows:
1. At the direction of the City Manager, or his/her designee(s), Attorney shall perform
for the City all necessary and reasonable services relating to employer -employee organization
relations and employment relations, including the providing of expert advice to the City Council
and City Manager or their designee(s), representing City in negotiations with employee
organizations, the drafting of Memorandums of Understanding, planning, reporting and study
sessions with City Management, and assistance in administering Memorandums of Understanding
and personnel ordinances and rules.
2. For Attorney's aforesaid services performed under this Agreement, City shall pay
Attorney an annual retainer fee of $20,000 for one bargaining unit negotiation. Said fee is payable
as follows; Five Thousand Seven Hundred Dollars ($5,700.00) upon the effective date hereof,
and eleven (11) monthly payments of One Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($1,300.00) on or
before the first day of each month during the balance of the term hereof, commencing September
1, 1999;
plus necessary costs and expenses as authorized by the City: provided however, the City may,
at its option, compensate Attorney for additional unit negotiations at the hourly rates provided for
under paragraph 3 below. Said fees shall be payable on the fifteenth day of each month during
the term hereof commencing on the effective date of this agreement.
3. Representation in connection with administrative hearings and court proceedings
are not covered under the basic services hereunder. Attorney shall, upon request of the City,
provide such representation at the rate of between One Hundred Thirty -Five and One Hundred
Ninety -Five Dollars ($135.00 - $195.00) per hour for the actual time such representation services
are rendered, plus necessary costs and expenses authorized by the City.
4. The term of this Agreement is twelve months, commencing September 1, 1999,
through August 31, 2000. The term may be extended for additional periods of time by the written
consent of the parties.
5. It is understood and agreed by the parties that Attorney is and shall remain an
independent contractor under this Agreement.
The parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and to be effective the day and year
first above written.
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & FRIERSON CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
A Professional Corporation
34527.1
A Municipal Corporation
By
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE September 7, 1999
4
AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE
Renewal of Commonwealth Energy Se ices Agreement with Greenpower Addendum
PREPARED BY
T. McAvoy
EXPLANATION
DEPARTMENT
Public Works
At the June 9, 1998 Council meeting, City Council awarded a contract, as negotiated by SANDAG on
behalf of its member agencies to Commonwealth Energy Power Services for the purchase of electric
energy power. The term of this contract was for one year with provisions for four (4) one year renewals.
Under this contract, accounts are receiving a savings of 2.5% below what we would have otherwise
paid.
We are now asking that Council renew this contract for Fiscal Year 2000 with the "Greenpower
Addendum" which will generate additional savings through the purchase of energy generated through
renewable energy sources.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
Funds reside in budgeted Public Vj4prks accounts: 626-422-223-234
001-422-221-235
4 i l A 125-422-2 -2341 Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDA'JON
Adopt the Resolution approving contract renewal with the Greenpower Addendum.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below )
1. Report from the San Diego Regional Power Pool
2. Council Agenda Statement Package of June 9, 1998
3. Renewal of Power Services Agreement
Resolution Nof 99-133
4. Greenpower Addendum
5. Resolution
A-200 (9/80)
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 133
RESOLUTION OF 1111. CITY COUNCIL OF
1HE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING ME
MAYOR TO EXECUTE A RENEWAL AGREEMENT WITH
COMMONWEALTH ENERGY CORPORATION AND A
"GREENPOWER" ADDENDUM TO 1111: AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, at the City Council meeting on June 9, 1998, the City Council
approved an agreement, as negotiated by SANDAG on behalf of its member agencies, with
Commonwealth Energy Corporation for the purchase of electric energy power; and
WHEREAS, the term of the contract was for one year with provisions for four (4)
one-year renewals; and
WHEREAS, because the City is receiving a savings of 2.5 percent on energy
services under the agreement with Commonwealth Energy Corporation, it has been
recommended that the agreement be extended for an additional one year term; and
WHEREAS, it has also been recommended that the City enter into a
"Greenpower" Addendum which will enable the City to realize additional savings through the
purchase of energy generated through renewable energy sources.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute a renewal agreement with Commonwealth
Energy Corporation and a "Greenpower" Addendum to the agreement. A copy of the agreement
and the addendum are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 7a` day of September, 1999.
George H. Waters, Mayor
A11'hST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
San Diego Association of Governments
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
April 23, 1999 AGENDA REPORT No.: 99-4- 23
Action Requested: INFORMATION
REPORT FROM THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL POWER POOL
Introduction
SANDAG authorized the formation of the San Diego Regional Power Pool in March of last year.
The Board also created a Power Pool Committee consisting of a representative of each
participating public agency to make decisions and recommendations to the agencies on power
contracts and related matters. Attachment A lists the Power Pool Executive Committee and the
78 current member agencies.
Commonwealth Energy Corporation is the private energy service provider of electricity to the
Power Pool's members, SANDAG provides staffing and contracts for expert consultant
assistance, and SDG&E continues to provide transmission, distribution and billing facilities and
services.
This report discusses the Regional Power Pool's progress in its first year and recent actions by
the Power Pool Committee to recommend to the member agencies that they:
• Review their membership in the Power Pool for the coming year and offer membership in the
Power Pool to public agencies in the San Diego region who are currently not members.
• Provide an option to the Power Pool's members to purchase green power generated by a
renewable, less polluting energy source, at a savings equal to or greater than the Pool's
existing discounts.
Discussion
First Year's Progress
The first year's accomplishments have included the following:
1. Creation of the San Diego Regional Power Pool as an operating entity with 78 member
agencies, a decision -making body, governance structure, and staff.
2. Execution of Power Service Agreements among the Power Pool member agencies,
SANDAG and the private sector energy services contractor to provide guaranteed
discounts on electricity bills.
3. Transfer of 4,500 electric accounts to the Power Pool. Accounts are receiving a savings
of 2.5% below the total monthly electric utility bill they would have otherwise paid.
4. Installation of about ,500 "smart meters" on larger Power Pool electric accounts. The
meters read electricity use hourly and can be used to design energy efficiency programs
to save additional electric energy and further lower bills.
The first year's experience also included a number of challenges and problems which staff and
SANDAG's electric industry consultants believe have been worked out satisfactorily. It should
be noted that private sector energy service providers and utilities throughout the state have
experienced similar problems. SDG&E and the Power Pool's private energy service provider
have worked together diligently to solve these problems.
Difficulties were experienced in transferring accounts and meters to the Power Pool, and in
billing and accounting for the energy savings. Currently, about 175 smaller accounts have still
not been transferred to the Power Pool due to discrepancies in account location and identification
information, and there are around 100 smart meters that have yet to be installed due to logistical
and supply problems. The Regional Power Pool's electric service provider has agreed to provide
discounts retroactive to October 1, 1998 to all accounts where savings have been delayed
because smart meters were installed at a later date.
The discounts received by the Power Pool to date total approximately $100,000. In the coming
year, with all of the Power Pool accounts active, savings should total over $900,000.
Public Agency Renewal of Power Pool Membership for FY 2000
The San Diego Regional Power Pool Committee recommended at its April 9, 1999 meeting that
the Power Pool's current members renew their membership in the Pool, and their contracts for
electricity supply and discounts with the current energy service provider — Commonwealth
Energy Corporation — for another year. The Committee also recommended that the
approximately 30 public agencies in the region that currently are not members of the Power Pool
be invited to participate.
The Power Pool's members are positioned to receive a full year's cost savings now that the
implementation phase is essentially complete. With start-up completed, the Power Pool
Committee can evaluate additional potential cost saving opportunities such as energy efficiency
and management programs and renewable energy initiatives.
2
Green Power Option
At the request of the Power Pool Committee, Commonwealth Energy Corporation has developed
a very favorable offer to the Pool's member agencies to purchase 100% geothermal power from
California sources in the Geysers area 100 miles north of San Francisco.
Geothermal energy is a renewable energy source with very low air emissions and solid waste
generation rates. There will be no change in power reliability whatsoever if an agency decides to
purchase green power. It has been certified by the California Energy Commission to receive
credits from the state's Renewable Resource Trust Fund, which will allow the Power Pool
members to purchase it at an estimated discount of between 3% and 5% below the comparable
total utility electric bill. This discount is even better than the Power Pool's basic discount. There
are restrictions on the amount of state credits available to specific accounts based on the electric
demand of the account and its total annual electricity usage. The Green Power offer allows each
account to switch back to the Power Pool's basic discounts when these limits are reached.
Attachment B is a fact sheet on green power prepared by the Regional Energy Office at the
Request of the Power Pool Committee. The purpose of the fact sheet is to describe the positive
environmental and energy benefits of green power, and to assist member agencies in evaluating
the Power Pool's green power option.
Conclusion
The San Diego Regional Power Pool is leading the way in defining and creating a competitive
market that responds to the needs of public agencies in California. In the next year, the Power
Pool will continue to serve as a key test case of the advantages predicted for partial deregulation
of the state's electricity market.
THE. SUJ.7.F
Executive Director
Attachments
Key Staff Contact: Steve Sachs, (619) 595-5346; e-mail: ssa@sandag.cog.ca.us
Funds are Budgeted in Overall Work Program #105.06
3
Attachment A
San Diego Regional Power Pool
San Diego Regional Power Pool Executive Committee
Executive Committee Members
Mayor Dick Lyon, City of Oceanside, Chair
Councilmember Ramona Finnila, City of Carlsbad
Councilmember Harry Mathis, San Diego Trolley, Inc.
Councilmember John Moot, City of Chula Vista
Councilmember Mark Rozmus, City of San Marcos
Councilmember Richard Ramos, City of El Cajon
Supervisor Pam Slater, County of San Diego
Ken Andrecht, Port of San Diego
Paul Dorey, Vista Irrigation District
Karlena Rannals, Rancho Santa Fe Fire District
Owen T. Sweeney, San Diego County Office of Education
Arthur Triplette, San Diego City Schools
Committee Members
Alpine Union School District
Bonsall Union School District
Borrego Springs Fire Protection District
Borrego Springs Unified School District
Borrego Water District
Cajon Valley Union School District
Cardiff School District
Carlsbad Unified School District
Chula Vista Elementary School District
City of Carlsbad
City of Chula Vista
City of Coronado
City of Del Mar
City of El Cajon
City of Encinitas
City of Escondido
City of Imperial Beach
City of La Mesa
City of National City
City of Oceanside
City of Poway
City of San Marcos
City of Santee
City of Solana Beach
City of Vista
Coronado Unified School District
County of San Diego
Dehesa School District
Del Mar Union School District
Encina Wastewater Authority
Encinitas Union School District
Escondido Union High School District
Escondido Union School District
Fallbrook Elem. School District
Fallbrook High School District
Jamul-Dulzura School District
Julian Union High School District
Julian Union School District
La Mesa - Spring Valley School District
Lakeside Union School District
Lemon Grove School District
Leucadia Water District
Mountain Empire Unified School District
National School District
North County Fire Protection District
North County Transit District
Oceanside Unified School District
Otay Municipal Water District
Padre Dam Municipal Water District
Pauma School District
Poway Unified School District
Rancho Santa Fe Fire Protection District
Rancho Santa Fe School District
San Diego Community College District
SD County Office of Education
San Diego County Water Authority
San Diego Transit Corporation
San Diego Trolley
San Diego Unified Port District
San Diego Unified School District
San Dieguito Irrigation District
San Dieguito Union High School District
San Elijo Joint Powers Authority
San Marcos Unified School District
San Pasqual Union School District
San Ysidro School District
Santee School District
Solana Beach School District
South Bay Union School District
Spencer Valley School District
Sweetwater Union High School District
Vallecitos School District
Valley Center Fire Protection District
Valley Center Union School District
Vista Irrigation District
Vista Unified School District
Warner Unified School District
Yuima Municipal Water District
4
Attachment B
San Diego
April 14, 1999
Fact Sheet on Renewable ("Green") Power
The San Diego Regional Energy Office has prepared this report on renewable energy for the
San Diego Regional Power Pool participants. The purpose of the report is to provide a better
understanding of the issues to be considered while evaluating renewable or "green" power
options. Commonwealth Energy Corporation, the Power Pool's energy service provider,
recently submitted a green power purchase option for consideration by the Power Pool's
members.
Electric industry Restructuring, Choice and Renewable Energy
California's $22 billion electric industry restructuring has provided the customer with important
choices with respect to their provider and source of electricity. With this choice comes the
ability to influence the source of electricity production, particularly with respect to environmental
impacts of power supply. The evolution of this "customer -driven" market provides aggregated
customer groups, such as the San Diego Regional Power Pool, a unique opportunity to affect
positive changes on industry behavior by choosing cleaner, less -polluting renewable, or "green"
sources of electric power. Market power can provide the necessary demand to significantly
influence the increased rate of development and supply of renewable power.
Definition of Renewable Energy
Renewable energy sources are either
continuously supplied (such as sunlight),
or tap inexhaustible resources (such as in
geothermal, landfill gas or hyrdoelectric).
In contrast, fossil fuels form relatively
slowly in comparison to consumption.
Coal, natural gas and oil rely on a finite
resource supply that may eventually be
exhausted. In addition, these sources are
more polluting when used to produce
electricity. The California Energy
Commission defines eligible renewable
energy as geothermal, small hydroelectric
(30MW or smaller), solar thermal,
photovoltaic, wind and biomass. Non-
renewable sources of energy include coal,
large hydroelectric, oil, natural gas and
nuclear.
Geothermal plants similar to those in operation in Northern
California and the Imperial Valley. Eight power plants at the
Salton Sea now supply 235 MW of power to southern
California.
5
Commonwealth Energy's green power purchase option is supplied by geothermal power from
plants similar to those shown in the photo at right.
Geothermal power plants take advantage of a natural, clean energy source —heat from the
Earth's interior —to produce electricity. Under the right geological conditions, the Earth's heat
collects in large underground reservoirs of steam or hot water. This energy is tapped by drilling
wells into the reservoirs and piping the steam or hot water to power plants, which convert the
heat to electricity.
"System Power vs. Green
Power"
The California Energy Commission
has developed a "Power Content
Label" that enables customers to
compare and evaluate green energy
offerings. The current contract with
Commonwealth delivers the same
traditional "system" power that is
typically provided by SDG&E
(procured through the California
Power Exchange [PX]). The current
mix of PX energy resources is
exhibited in the Power Content Label.
In contrast, Commonwealth's offering
would show 100% Geothermal.
In spite of the changes within the
utility industry over the last few years,
the electric utility system has always
favored conventional fossil fuels for
power generation over renewable
resource options. However, barriers
to renewable energy persist. For
example, although efficiency and renewable energy technologies are often less expensive on a
life -cycle basis, their up -front costs are typically higher, and thus present a barrier to most
customers.
POWER CONTENT
ENERGY
RESOURCES
SOG&E
POWER*
(Projected)
11%
LABEL
1997 CA
POWER MIX**
(tor Comparison)
11%
Eligible Renewable
- Biomass & waste
2%
2%
- Geothermal
5%
5%
- Small hydroelectric
2%
2%
- Solar
<1%
<1%
-Wind
1%
1%
Coal
21%
21%
Large Hydroelectric
23%
23%
Natural Gas
30%
30%
Nudear
15%
15%
Other
<1%
<1%
Total
100%
100%
• 0%d SOME Power is speciallyprchased from h i ideal suppler'.
are estimated annually by the California Energy
based on the electricity sold to Caliomia consumers
during the previous year.
For specific Intonation about this electricity product, contact
San Diego Gas & Electric. For general kibanallon about the
Power Canters Label, contact the California Energy Commission
at 1.800-555-7794 or www.energyca.gw/consumer
The Benefits of Renewable Energy
The benefits of renewable energy are significant The following is a brief discussion of the
primary benefits:
1. Renewable energy reduces negative Impacts of power production on the
environment.
Renewable energy minimizes, and in some cases eliminates, negative environmental impacts of
electric generation. The production of conventional, fossil fuel -based energy accounts for the
majority of air pollution and is the primary source of greenhouse gases. Coal-fired power plants
6
emit most of this pollution. Even though there are no coal plants in the San Diego region, over
20% of the California electricity supply is generated by coal and over 50% from fossil fuels.
Electricity generation is responsible for approximately 80% of carbon dioxide emissions, 70% of
sulfur dioxide emissions, 33% of nitrogen oxide emissions, 23% of mercury emissions, and 23%
of direct emissions of airborne particulates'. As a result of the emissions, smog forms when
nitrogen oxides and reactive organic gases combine, especially on warm, still days. Smog
causes crop, forest, and property damage. Sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides both combine
with water in the atmosphere to create acid rain, which acidifies soils and waters, producing
negative impacts on plants, fish, and the animals. Carbon dioxide emissions are primary source
of greenhouse gas emissions, which are attributed to global warming. The effects of global
warming are uncertain, but they potentially include disruption of global weather patterns and
ecosystems, flooding, severe storms, and droughts. Decreasing environmental impacts and
costs through the use of renewable energy technologies will save money and help preserve and
sustain our natural resources for future generations.
With the passage of the Clean Air Act Amendments in 1990, the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) initiated tighter controls on power -plant emissions of sulfur dioxide, which is the
prime cause of acid rain. Geothermal plants emit less than 1% of the carbon dioxide of fossil -
fuel power plants2. Geothermal power plants are particularly well suited to meet the EPA
requirements for clean air because they emit no nitrogen oxides and very low amounts of sulfur
dioxide. Many plants can reduce air emissions to zero.
2. Renewable energy promotes the use of secure, indigenous, and replenishable
natural resources and enhances business and economic development
Eighty percent of every dollar spent on non -indigenous electricity is exported out of the local
economy. In addition, the greater the reliance on non -indigenous generation resources, the less
secure the generation supply (e.g., during natural disasters).
Three examples of economic benefits of renewable energy include:
• Decreasing our nation's dependence on oil imports saves money and enhances national
security;
• Avoiding the environmental costs of fossil -fueled energy sources saves money; and
• Business growth surrounding the development and sales - domestic and international -
of renewable energy technologies, generates income and jobs.
The Drawback of Renewable Energy
The major drawback to renewable energy is the cost premium which generally ranges from 5 to
30 percent, depending on the technology, and whether the source is existing or new. Many
argue that the higher cost is justified by the avoided environmental costs, reduced financial risks
such as future regulations, taxes on greenhouse gases, and price fluctuations associated with
fossil fuels.
2 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL).
Energy Information Administration, "State Electricity Profiles", DOE/EIA-0629, March 1999.
7
In the Commonwealth Energy offering, incentive funds provided by the California Energy
Commission3 exceed the cost premium of the geothermal power, therefor, the net cost is less
than conventional system power.
Reliability of Renewable Energy
From the perspective of the Regional Power
Pool, the reliability of electric service is a
function of the distribution system, not the
generation source. Regardless of the energy
provider or the type electricity purchased, the
distribution of electricity will continue to be
managed by SDG&E with oversight from the
California Public Utilities Commission.
Public Support of Renewable
Energy
Recent surveys indicate that a large segment
of the population recognizes the benefits of
renewable energy and are willing to pay a
premium.
The Significance of Electricity Choice
Willingness to Pay for
Renewably Generated Electricity
To 4% To 9% To 19% To ftP% TO $P%
Paernt Prosn1um
Results of recent surveys indicating the willingness to
pay a premium for renewable energy.
Historically, local government agencies have been accountable to their constituents on a variety
of utility decisions that effect the community and its quality of life. These decisions range from
waste collection and sewage to water distribution and storage. City and County government
officials evaluate the consequences of these decisions and their effect on their communities,
particularly where environmental impacts are concerned. Government agencies have not
historically been involved with electricity as a commodity. Like most products, electricity
consumers don't connect their purchase of electricity to its environmental impacts. In many
cases the impacts are outside the boundaries of the agencies so it does not appear to be a local
issue. The issue of choice presents San Diego regional public agencies with a chance to
influence clean air and future energy options. The choice of renewable energy is consistent
with the policies set forth in the Regional Energy Plan.
If you have any questions on this report, would like assistance during your deliberations
regarding the green power offering, or if you would like more information on renewable energy
or other means to supply loads from renewable energy (e.g., on -site solar photovoltaics), please
do not hesitate to call the Regional Energy Office at (619) 595-5630.
3 The source of renewable energy incentives is the AB 1890 "public goods" surcharge on all electric customer bills.
8
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE June 9, 1998
10
AGENDA ITEM NO
ITEM TITLE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL POWER P00
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION.
See attached.
Terry McAvoy
DEPARTMEN
Public Works
Environmental Review
x N/A
Financial Statement
Funds reside in annually budgeted Public
Works operational accounts.
&& t Account No
001-422-221-235
125-422-222-234
626-422-223-234
STAFF RECOMMENDATION That Council award a contract for electric energy power
service to CoenonWeal-th Energy Power Services, and authorize the Mayor to sign a Memo-
randum of Understanding with Sandag as a particiapnt in the San Diego Regional Power
Pool as well as, a contract with CommonWealth Energy Power Service for electric power.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No 98-66
Letter dated 13 April, 1998 with attachments
Memorandum of Understanding the Sandag
CommonWealth Energy Power Services Agreement
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
As council is aware the San Diego Association of Governments ( SANDAG)
has been pursuing the development of a Regional Power Pool. These efforts
have resulted in an offering by Commonwealth Energy for the providing of
electric energy service to participants in the San Diego Regional Power Pool.
SANDAG is requesting the City's consideration of this offering and
participation in the Regional Power Pool. Staff has reviewed this offering and
has found it to be acceptable. Energy related savings associated with this
offering equal approximately $15,000 over the one year term of the offering.
The contract to be signed with Commonwealth Energy is a stand alone
contract for a one year term. In no way is the City liable for the contractual
obligations of any other participating agency. Each Contract for energy service
is separate and complete. SANDAG's continuing function will be as a
clearinghouse for information dealing with energy deregulation ,wherein a
consultant can be retained on behalf of all participating agencies to assist in
monitoring legislation associated with energy deregulation and the formulation
and evaluation of an RFP for energy services for the following year. The
offering by Commonwealth Energy provides a funding mechanism to support
this Consultant activity.
A representative for SANDAG is available to answer any questions.
RESOLUTION NO.98 - 66
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SANDAG
AS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL POWER
POOL, AND AN AGREEMENT WITH COMMONWEALTH
ENERGY CORPORATION FOR Fi ECTRIC POWER
WHEREAS, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) has been
pursuing the development of a Regional Power Pool which has resulted in an offering by
Commonwealth Energy Corporation for the providing of electric energy service to participants
in the San Diego Regional Power Pool; and
WHEREAS, SANDAG is requesting the City's consideration of this offering
and participation in the Regional Power Pool; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed this offering and has found it to be acceptable;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
National City that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute a Memorandum of Understanding
with SANDAG as a participant in the San Diego Regional Power Pool, and sign an Agreement
with CommonWealth Energy Power Corporation for electric power. Said Memorandum of
Understanding and Agreement are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 9th day of June, 1998.
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
George H. Waters, Mayor
Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California, on June 9, 1998, by
the following vote, to -wit:
Ayes: Councilmembers Beauchamp, Inzunza, Morrison, Zarate, Waters.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
Abstain: None.
AUTHENTICATED BY:
GEORGE H. WATERS
Mayor of the City of National City, California
itt/lej
Ci Clerk of the • �
of National City, California
By:
Deputy
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO. 98-66 of the City of National City, California, passed and adopted by the
Council of said City on June 9, 1998.
City Clerk of the City of National City, California
By:
Deputy
5/8/98
low
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG)
AND THE PUBLIC AGENCY PARTICIPANTS IN THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL POWER POOL
Purpose. The purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is to:
A Provide public agencies in the San Diego area an opportunity to save money on electricity costs as a result of industry
restructuring;
B. Transfer knowledge to public agencies on efficient and effective methods for achieving cost savings in the
restructured electricity market;
C. Set forth the basic structure for public agencies to receive electricity cost savings from electric restructuring in
California without having to individually bear the total costs of procurement, contracting, and administration necessary
to achieve the energy service cost benefits;
D. Position the San Diego Regional Power Pool to make effective and timely decisions and to increase future savings as
opportunities arise and the market matures; and
E. Create a structure for the San Diego area public agencies that will facilitate competitive power suppliers responding to
the particular needs of the participating public agencies and their constituents.
Upon execution, this MOU between the public agency participant and SANDAG shall remain in effect for the period of time
during which the public agency participant is purchasing power from a competitive supplier using a master bilateral contract with
a energy service provider selected by the San Diego Regional Power Pool.
There is no cost to public agencies for entering into this Memorandum of Understanding.
There is no legal or financial liability created between SANDAG and public agency participants in the San Diego Regional
Power Pool, nor among the power pool participants, as a result of entering into this Memorandum of Understanding.
Definition of Public Aoencies. Public agencies include agencies and their subsidiary non profit corporations.
San Dieoo Regional Power Pool. The San Diego Regional Power Pool was created to pursue maximum electricity service
cost savings, with limited or no financial risk, through the use of a power purchase contract that provides the flexibility for public
agencies to take advantage of competition in the restructured electric service industry. The San Diego Regional Power Pool
will operate through a Power Pool Committee created by the SANDAG Board. The Committee's membership will consist of
one representative from each public agency that has an effective MOU with SANDAG. The Responsibilities and duties of the
Committee will include:
A. Review and selection of a competitive energy service provider(s) that is viewed as offering cost savings of most
interest to the San Diego Regional Power Pool participants;
B. Develop a master bilateral contract(s) for the purchase of power and other energy services by the participants;
C. Administer the Memorandum of Understanding between participating public agencies and SANDAG regarding
participation in the power pool and its administration; and:
D. Provide guidance to SANDAG staff on program administration and other matters necessary for the surr.Psful
operation of the San Diego Regional Power Pool. -
The Committee will choose its own operating rules and procedures including voting formula, selection of officers, and
subcommittee structure, if necessary. -
Responsibilities of SANDAG. The responsibilities and duties of SANDAG in the on -going operation and administration of the
San Diego Regional Power Pool will include:
A. Facilitating creation of the Power Pool Committee and authorizing agreements and other actions necessary for the
pool to make decisions on power purchases and related energy services;
B. Provide staff and administrative support to the Power Pool Committee in managing the electricity service provider(s)
and in pe'orming other functions necessary for the success of the San Diego Regional Power Pool;
C. Receive payments from electricity service provider(s) selected by the San Diego Regional Power Pool to fund
administration and support activities provided by SANDAG; account for payments received over the costs of
administration and support and dsthbute those payments to Gene it the power pool and its members, as determined
by the Power Pool Committee;
5/8/98
D. Consider Power Pool Committee recommendations, and take appropriate actions, regarding developments,
issues and opportunities for achieving the contemplated electric energy cost savings and communnitewith
the
region's businesses and residents on these matters; and "
E Consider legislative and regulatory recommendations from the Power Pool Committee and communicate with local,
state, and federal representatives on these issues.
Responsibilities of Participating Public Agencies. The responsibilities and duties of participating public agencies in the on-
going cperation and administration of the San Diego Regional Power Pool will include:
A Determine if it will enter into bilateral contract, negotiated by SANDAG, with the electricity service provider(s), and
select meters to be entered in the San Diego Regional Power Pool;
B. Participate as a member of the Power Pool Committee, if desired by the public agency,
C. Supply the Power Pool Comunifee and SANDAG with notice of any verifiable written offer received for an
Poollished supplier to snugly electricity at a rate lower than the rate current* being delivered through the Power
D. Through the Power Pool Committee, make recommendations to SANDAG on legislative and
tory issues, and
deveopments, trends, issues and opportunities for electricity purchases to the region's governments, businesses and
resi
SAN DIEGO REGIONAL POWER POOL PARTICIPANT SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS .
Signature Signature
George ... .......:�:.
Name q H. Waters NameTitle
Mayor
Date June 9, 1998
Date
Address 1243 National City Blvd
National City, CA 91950 Address
Agency City of National City
APPROVED AS TO FORM
George H. Esser, Ill
City Attorney
5/8/98
COMMONWEALTH ENERGY POWER SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement ('Agreement) is entered into by and between Commonwealth Energy Corporation ('COMMONWEALTH'),
a California Corporation, and San Diego Regional Power Pool participant ('PARTICIPANT') effective the date written
below and based upon the following recitals, covenants and conditions:
WHEREAS, PARTICIPANT controls the electricity purchases for the meter or meters listed on Schedule A contained herein
or separately attached hereto (individually, a 'Meter and, collectively, the 'Meters');
WHEREAS, COMMONWEALTH is in the business of providing low cost electricity and related services and is registered by
the California Public Utilities Commission as an Electric Service Provider (ESP #1092) and with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission as a Power Marketer,
WHEREAS, COMMONWEALTH has been selected through a competitive biding process and has entered into an
Agreement with the San Diego Association of Governments (the "SANDAG Agreement"), the administrator of the San
Diego Regional Power Pool, and has furnished a performance bond to SANDAG for use by the San Diego Regional Power
Pool to pay the costs of conducting another Power Procurement Process if COMMONWEALTH were to default under the
SANDAG Agreement or this Agreement
WHEREAS, COMMONWEALTH hereby offers to PARTICIPANT electric power purchasing services under California's
competitive power supply program created by AB 1890 and known as the Direct Access program ('Direct Access'), at a
discount to the rates offered by CUSTOMER'S Utility Distribution Company ('UDC');
WHEREAS, PARTICIPANT wishes to participate in COMMONWEALTH'S power purchasing program;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the covenants, recitals and conditions contained herein and for other good and
valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, COMMONWEALTH and PARTICIPANT hereby enter into
this Agreement
DEFINITIONS
All capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the respective meanings set forth in Schedule B
attached hereto.
AGREEMENT
1. COMMONWEALTH SERVICES: COMMONWEALTH shall procure electric power to serve the full requirements of the
meter loads specified by PARTICIPANT and listed in Schedule A, and shall perform, manage or acquire all functions
necessary, including scheduling through a CAISO-certified Scheduling Coordinator, to effect delivery of such power to
PARTICIPANT through the California Direct Access system. PARTICIPANT shall have the right to include any meters
(existing or new) into this Agreement at any time during the ten of the Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice
to COMMONWEALTH.. OOMMONWEATH shall be PARTICIPANTS' exclusive electrical supply purchasing agent for
the loads specified in Schedule A during the term of this Agreement, with the exclusive right to pursue, evaluate and
negotiate any and all electric supply procurement opportunities for the purpose of reducing PARTICIPANTS electric
supply procurement costs. PARTICIPANT shall keep COMMONWEALTH apprised of other energy cost reduction
options it may pursue and shall forward to COMMONWEALTH any proposals from any other sources that may lead to a
reduction in PARTICIPANTS electricity unit costs for electric supply procurement
2. PRICING:
2.1 Guaranteed Savings: COMMONWEALTH shall provide electrical energy to PARTICIPANT at a rate such that
PARTICIPANT is guaranteed a minimum savings of ('Guaranteed Savings'):
• Three and one-half percent (3.5%) discount below the otherwise applicable total bill from the
PARTICIPANTS UDC provided the San Diego Regional Power Pool has an Aggregated Monthly Load Factor
greater than or equal to .60,
5/8/98
■ Two and one-half percent (2.5%) discount below the otherwise applicable total bill from the PARTICIPANT'S
UDC provided the San Diego Regional Power Pool has an Aggregated Monthly Load Factor greater than or
equal to .55 but less than .60,
• Two percent (2%) discount below the otherwise applicable total bill from the PARTICIPANT'S UDC provided
the San Diego Regional Power Pool has an Aggregated Monthly Load Factor greater than or equal to .50 but
less than .55,
• One and one-half percent (1.5%) discount below the otherwise applicable total bill from the PARTICIPANT'S
UDC provided the San Diego Regional Power Pool has an Aggregated Monthly Load Factor less than .50.
Z2 Incremental Savings: In addition, COMMONWEALTH will share with PARTICIPANT any realized cost saving
beyond the applicable Guaranteed Savings ('Incremental Savings') according to the following schedule: seventy
five percent (75%) of Incremental Savings to PARTICIPANT and twenty five percent (25%) of Incremental Savings
to COMMONWEALTH. Incremental Savings is defined as the difference between (1) the amount PARTICIPANT
would have paid for electrical energy during the billing period under PX pricing as a bundled utility customer under
its Applicable Tariff and (2) COMMONWEALTH'S Cost of Power, less the Guaranteed Savings, provided that the
Incremental Savings cannot be negative. COMMONWEALTH's Cost of Power is defined as its purchased
generation costs plus any out-of-pocket costs for functions required to utilize the ISO controlled grid for energy
delivered to PARTICIPANT, provided that the cost for such functions shall not exceed what PARTICIPANTS cost
would have been with bundled utility service.
2.3 Energy Charoe Calculation: COMMONWEALTH'S bill amount for the energy and services provided to
PARTICIPANT by COMMONWEALTH shall be equal to COMMONWEALTH'S actual Cost of Power for the
electrical energy delivered to PARTICIPANT, plus 25% of any Incremental Savings, provided that in no event will
COMMONWEALTH's bill amount to PARTICIPANT exceed an amount which ensures that PARTICIPANT realizes
the Guaranteed Savings. There shall be no additional charges to PARTICIPANT related to COMMONWEALTH'S
provision of electrical energy service beyond those described above and in section 4 of this Agreement. The above
pricing includes the provision of all services or functions which are, or may be required, to be performed, managed,
or acquired by COMMONWEALTH including without limitation billing, Meter Data Management Agent (MDMA)
functions, and all schedule coordination services, to effect delivery of power to PARTICIPANT whether or not they
are specifically enumerated in this Agreement.
3. SCHEDULE COORDINATION SERVICES: Schedule coordination services required to effect delivery of power to
PARTICIPANT shall be performed by COMMONWEALTH or by contractors approved by the California Public Utilities
Commission and the Independent System Operator and under contract to COMMONWEALTH.
4. METERING: If required, COMMONWEALTH shall provide, install, own and maintain at a cost of $22 per month per
meter Direct Access Meters to PARTICIPANT. COMMONWEALTH shall own, insure, warrant, and provide meter
support services including corrective maintenance services for all meters installed under this Agreement at no
additional cost to the $22 per month metering charge. If required; additional communications equipment (extension of
phone/modem line beyond 10 feet from meter installation location) shall be the responsibility of the PARTICIPANT.
Upon the expiration or sooner termination of this Agreement, PARTICIPANT may purchase meter(s) at a fair market
value or COMMONWEALTH will remove the meter at no additional cost at PARTICIPANT'S option.
COMMONWEALTH shall allow PARTICIPANT to own, install, and maintain its own Direct Access Meter at
PARTICIPANT'S option without PARTICIPANT incurring the $22 per month per meter charge. PARTICIPANT grants
COMMONWEALTH, its contractors and agents the right to enter its premises to install, repair, maintain, and remove
meters provided by COMMONWEALTH.
5. BILLING: PARTICIPANT elects to receive a consolidated invoice submitted by the UDC for UDC charges and
COMMONWEALTH'S charges. COMMONWEALTH shall take the necessary steps to fulfil the ESP obligations set forth
under the UDC's direct access rules, with no charge to PARTICIPANT , to ensure that PARTICIPANT is billed through
the Consolidated UDC Billing option for the energy services to be provided by COMMONWEALTH according to the
5/8/98
pricing terms specified in this Agreement. All meter rearing and data processing functions are included as a part of this
billing service obligation.
6. ENERGY CONSUMPTION INFORMATION: PARTICIPANT shall designate COMMONWEALTH to PARTICIPANT'S
current electricity supplier(s) as an authorized recipient of PARTICIPANTS current and historical electricity cost and
usage data. PARTICIPANT shall provide facility descriptions, operating information and such other information
available to PARTICIPANT as COMMONWEALTH may reasonably require in the performance of its services under this
Agreement and that PARTICIPANT is comfortable providing; provided that such requests shall be reviewed and
approved by SANDAG prior to COMMONWEALTH making the request to PARTICIPANT . Except as specifically
authorized by PARTICIPANT to disclose such information and except for use by SANDAG for the purpose of verifying
the calculation of its Aggregation Fee, COMMONWEALTH shall maintain in accordance with CPUC rules and decisions
any and all such information provided by PARTICIPANTS current electricity supplier(s) as confidential.
COMMONWEALTH shall provide semi-annual consolidated summary reports to each PARTICIPANT regarding
PARTICIPANTS historical monthly energy usage and savings achieved compared to PX costs for each meter. At no
additional cost, PARTICIPANTS with installed Direct Access Meters will be able to view and electronically download
historical energy use data through a secure intemet server on a daily basis or more frequently, if required.
7. QUALITY: COMMONWEALTH shall procure and provide firm electric power supplies to meet the full energy
requirements of PARTICIPANTS loads specified in Schedule A.
8. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 1998.
9. TERM OF AGREEMENT: This Agreement shall commence on the effective date for a term of one (1) year from the
date PARTICIPANT begins receipt of service from COMMONWEALTH, or until June 30, 1999, whichever occurs first,
with PARTICIPANT having the option to renew at the existing terms of this Agreement for up to four (4) additional one
year periods beginning on July 1 of every year. PARTICIPANT may exercise its option to renew by giving written notice
thereof to COMMONWEALTH at least thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the then current term.
10. LOW PRICE GUARANTEE: If, after at least six (6) months from the execution of this Agreement, The San Diego
Regional Power Pool receives a verifiable written offer by an Established Supplier to supply The San Diego Regional
Power Pool's electricity at a rate which The San Diego Regional Power Pool believes is below the COMMONWEALTH
delivered rate, then COMMONWEALTH shall have thirty (30) days from notice of the offer to elect to supply
PARTICIPANT The San Diego Regional Power Pool the electricity and equivalent service, if any, as described in the
offer on terms equivalent to the offer. If after thirty (30) days' notice of the offer, COMMONWEALTH has not elected in
writing to supply The San Diego Regional Power Pool the electricity and services under terms equivalent to the offer
and The San Diego Regional Power Pool accepts the offer, then the PARTICIPANT will terminate this Agreement
without penalty or liability.
11. COMMUNICATIONS: All communications shall be in writing and sent or delivered to the address set forth opposite the
Party's signature hereto or such other address as may be designated by written notice, and shall be deemed given when
received.
12. AUDIT AND INSPECTION OF RECORDS: COMMONWEALTH shall maintain complete and accurate records with
respect to the Guaranteed Savings, Incremental Savings, and Cost of Power calculations under Section 2 under this
Agreement. All such records shall be maintained on a generally accepted accounting basis and shall be clearly
identified. COMMONWEALTH shall provide reasonable access to the representatives of PARTICIPANT, or their
appointees, to such books and records. PARTICIPANT reserves the right to examine and audit such books and records
and to make transcripts or copies of them as necessary. COMMONWEALTH shall allow inspection of all work data,
documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final
payment under this Agreement. In addition to the above accounting records, COMMONWEALTH shall maintain
records to show actual costs for its Cost of Power.
13. INDEMNIFICATION: At no time shall PARTICIPANT, including its officers, agents and employees, parent or subsidiary
company be liable or forced to pay penalties, fees, fines or any other sanction levied against COMMONWEALTH by the
5/8/98
Independent System Operator, the California Public Utilities Commission, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
or any other entity as a result of any default on the part of COMMONWEALTH in regards to performance of duties
required by this Agreement. Should, for any reason, PARTICIPANT be directly assessed any fine, fee or penalty by
any entity because of COMMONWEALTH'S activities regarding this Agreement, COMMONWEALTH will be fully
responsible for payment thereof. COMMONWEALTH will defend, indemnify, and hold PARTICIPANT harmless from
losses, claims or costs of any kind caused or alleged to have been caused by COMMONWEALTH'S negligence, actions
or inactions.
14. INSURANCE: COMMONWEALTH shall maintain comprehensive general liability insurance in minimum limits of $1
million/occurrence and $3 million aggregate and shall maintain workers' compensation insurance as required by
California law. COMMONWEALTH will provide proof of insurance to PARTICIPANT upon signature and request
15. ASSIGNMENT: Neither COMMONWEALTH nor PARTICIPANT may assign this Agreement without the prior written
consent of the other. If written consent to assignment is not given within 15 days after a written request therefor, which
consent will not be unreasonably withheld, then the party proposing the assignment may terminate this Agreement
without penalty or liability upon 30 days written notice, provided that COMMONWEALTH may not terminate for failure of
PARTICIPANT to consent to COMMONWEALTH'S proposed assignment unless its proposed assignee is an
Established Supplier. An Established Supplier is defined as an entity possessing all of (1) all requisite certifications,
permits and authorities to perform COMMONWEALTH'S obligations under this Agreement, (2) a demonstrated track
record in the provision of electric power indicative of an ability to fully perform COMMONWEALTH'S obligations under
this Agreement, and (3) a net worth at least the equivalent of that of COMMONWEALTH'S as of the date of this
Agreement
16. FORCE MAJEURE: 'Force Majeure' shall be defined as an event that is not within the reasonable control of the Party
claiming suspension ('the Claiming Party'), and that by the exercise of due diligence, the Claiming Party is unable to
overcome in a commercially reasonable manner or obtain or cause to be obtained a commercially reasonable substitute
performance therefor, and such event shall not be deemed to be a default under this Agreement Force Majeure
includes, but is not limited to: acts of God; fire; war, flood; earthquake; civil disturbance, sabotage; failure of facilities or
breakage of machinery or equipment of parties other than the Claiming party; supply curtailment due to UDC equipment
failure; declaration of emergency by the ISO/PX; regulatory or legislative action, or action or restraint by court order or
governmental authority (so long as the Claiming Party has not applied for or assisted in the application for, and has
opposed where and to the extent reasonable, such govemmental action). Specifically excluded from Force Majeure
events is economic hardship due to market conditions, whatever their cause.
If either party shall be unable to carry out any obligation under this Agreement (other than the obligation to make
payments) due to Force Majeure, this Agreement shall remain in effect but such obligation shall be suspended for the
period necessary as a result of the Force Majeure, provided that: (I) the Claiming Party gives the other Party prompt
written notice describing the particulars of the Force Majeure, including but not limited to the nature and date of the
occurrence and the expected duration of the disability; (ii) the suspension of performance is of no greater scope and of
no longer duration than is required by the Force Majeure; and (iii) the Claiming Party uses commercially reasonable
efforts to remedy its inability to perform.
17. DEFAULT: Failure by COMMONWEALTH, any affiliate, parent company, partner or principal of COMMONWEALTH, in
the performance of any obligation under this Agreement constitutes default of this Agreement In the event of such
default, in addition to any other remedies it may have available by law, PARTICIPANT may terminate this Agreement at
its option by written notice to COMMONWEALTH. PARTICIPANT shall attempt to provide 30 days notice in the event
of such termination, but may provide less notice as it determines is reasonable under the circumstances.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: This Agreement, including any Exhibit or Schedule hereto, embodies the entire Agreement
and understanding, and supersedes all prior Agreements and understandings between the parties with respect to the
subject matter hereof. This Agreement may not be amended except by writing executed and delivered by the parties
hereto.
5/8/98
19. LAWS, VENUE, AND ATTORNEY'S FEES: This Agreement shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of the
State of California. If any action is brought to interpret or enforce any term of this Agreement, the action shall be
brought in a state or federal court situated in the County of San Diego, State of California. In the event of any such
litigation between the parties, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred, inducing
reasonable attorneys' fees, as determined by the court.
COMMONWEALTH ENERGY CORPORATION
•SAN DIEGO REGIONAL POWER POOL PARTICINI:t . ••• . • •• • • • • • •• •.'•
•
•
Signature
Name
Name
Title
Title
Date
Date
Address
Address
Agency
George H. Waters
Mayor
June 9, 1998
1243 National City Blvd
National City, CA 91950
City of National City
APPROVED AS TO FORM
/:PP/d/g1.,: 81"
George H. Eiser, Ill
City Attorney
5/8/98
Schedule A
Electric Meters to Participate in San Diego Regional Power Pool
5/8/98
Schedule B
Definitions
Aggregated Monthly Load Factor. Represents the Load Factor calculated for the period of a month for an aggregated
group. Aggregated Monthly Load Factor is calculated by summing the total kWh for all participants of an aggregation,
dividing that total by the number of hours in the month, and then dividing that number by the coincident peak kW for all
participants of the aggregation for the same month. For every meter that is eligible to use load profiling, COMMONWEALTH
shall apply California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) approved load profiles provided by San Diego Gas and Electric
(SDG&E) to the PARTICIPANT'S actual monthly kWh usage for that meter as recorded by SDG&E to calculate that meter's
demand for every hour of the period. The calculated hourly demand for each meter will then be used in conjunction with
actual hourly interval metered data to calculate the aggregated group's coincident peak kW. For each meter not eligible to
use load profiling, COMMONWEALTH shall use actual recorded kWh usage for the month and actual recorded kW for each
hour in the month in its calculated of the aggregated group's coincident peak demand. A meter's eligibility (less than 50 kW)
to use load profiling is defined by the CPUC in D. 97-10-086. The approved load profiles may be found on the Internet at
http /1162.15.5.21wk-group/daidaiL
Applicable Tariff: The current or subsequent public rate or tariff schedule detailing utility rates, rules and terms of service
that are filed with and approved by a regulatory agency and for which the customer is qualified to obtain service.
California Independent System Operator (CAISO): The entity responsible for the operation and control of the statewide
transmission grid pursuant to AB 1890.
California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC): The regulatory agency established to regulate privately owned utilities and
to ensure adequate service to the public at rates which are just and reasonable both to customers and shareholders of the
utilities.
Cost of Power: As defined in Section 2.2 of this Agreement
Direct Access (DA): A service election which allows customers to purchase competitive energy services from non -utility
entities registered with the State of California known as ESPs.
Direct Access Meters: An interval meter that complies with CPUC meter design specifications and is required by certain
customers to participate in Direct Access. This meter must meet CPUC meter design specification at the time of meter
installation. An interval meter is defined as a meter capable of reading and storing electric consumption data at specified
time intervals of no greater than one hour as required for Direct Access settlement and data required to bill applicable UDC
tariffs.
Electric Service Provider (ESP): An entity which provides electric service to a retail or end -use customer, but which does
not fall within the definition of an electrical corporation under Public Utilities Code Section 218.
Established Supplier: As defined in Section 15 of this Agreement
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission: The federal regulatory agency responsible for regulating the activities of key
portions of the nation's natural gas utilities, electric utilities, natural gas pipeline transportation utilities, and hydroelectric
power producers.
Guaranteed Savings: As defined in Section 2.1 of this Agreement
Incremental Savings: As defined in Section 2.2 of this Agreement
Kilowatt (kW): Often referred to as electric demand, kW is the amount of energy drawn by a customer at a specific time.
Kilowatt-hour (kWh). Electric energy expressed in kilowatt-hours is measured by multiplying the amount of electric power
delivered (measured in watts) by the amount of time over which the energy was consumed (measured in hours). Kilowatts
equal one thousand watt-hours. Megawatts equal a million watt-hours or one thousand kilowatt-hours.
5/8/98
Load Factor. Load Factor indicates to what degree a participant's actual energy consumption (kWh) during a given time
period compared to the consumption that would have occurred had consumption been fully sustained at the participant's
maximum demand (kW) level. Load Factors are expressed in percentages, and higher load factors represent a more even
distribution of load. Load Factor is calculated by dividing the total kWh for a period by the hours in the period, and then
dividing that number by the peak kW for the same period.
Meter Data Management Agent (MDMA): MDMAs must be approved by the customer's UDC and is responsible for meter
reading, usage calculations and data acps.
Participant: An agency that executes a Memorandum of Understanding with SANDAG to join the San Diego Regional
Power Pool. A Participant may be a subsidiary public agency or non profit organization of the entity executing this
Agreement
Power Exchange (PX): A California state chartered, non profit organization charged with providing an efficient competitive
auction, open on a nondiscriminatory basis to all suppliers, that meets the loads of all exchange customers at efficient prices.
The PX is a scheduling coordinator and is independent of the CAISO and other market participants.
Power Procurement Process: The process which includes identifying qualified Electrical Service Providers, developing a
Request for Proposals, solicitation of ESP responses, evaluation of such proposals, negotiation of power purchase
agreements, and development of final contracts for competitive power purchases.
Meter (or Meters): As defined in the first Recital of this Agreement.
San Diego Regional Power Pool: An aggregated group of agencies established to coordinate the purchase of electric
energy, transmission, and other services on behalf of the participating agencies.
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG): SANDAG is the regional planning agency, as well as a key technical
and informational resource, for the area's eighteen incorporated cities and the county government who collectively are the
Association of Governments. Through this voluntary association, local governments work together to solve current problems
and plan for the future. SANDAG is a joint powers agency authorized under California State law.
Scheduling Coordinator (SC): An entity certified by the Federal Regulatory Commission through the CAISO that acts as a
go-between with the ISO on behalf of generators, supply aggregators (wholesale marketers), retailers, and customers to
schedule the distribution of electricity.
Utility Distribution Companies (UDCs): The entities which will continue to provide regulated services for the distribution of
electricity to customers and serve customers who do not choose direct access.
May 10, 1999
Mr. Fred Bloom
CEO and Chairman
Commonwealth Energy Corporation
15991 Red Hill Avenue
Tustin, CA 92780
RE: Renewal of Power Services Agreement
Dear Mr. Bloom:
This letter constitutes written notice to renew the Commonwealth Energy Power Services
Agreement between Commonwealth Energy Corporation and the San Diego Regional Power
pool participating agency identified below for an additional one year term starting July 1, 1999.
Member Agency Signature:
Name of Signato: George H. Waters, Mayor
Name of Agency: City of National City
cc: Steve Sachs, SANDAG
401 B. Street, Suite 800
San Diego, CA 92101
Please Mail to SANDAL, 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego CA 92101 do Marc Morley
GREEN POWER ADDENDUM
This Agreement shall be considered an addendum to the agreement entitled Commonwealth
Energy Power Services Agreement, by and between Commonwealth Energy Corporation (CEC)
and City of National City (Member), dated 7th September 1999
Member wishes to acquire all, or a portion of it's electric energy requirements, served by CEC
through the San Diego Association of Governments Power Pool, from sources certified by the
Center for Resources Solutions as renewable energy, ("Green Power"), and which is eligible for
credits from the California Energy Commission's Renewable Resource Trust Fund. CEC has
agreements in place to purchase Green Power from qualified generators and wishes to serve
member's accounts listed on the pages attached hereto and made hereby a part of this
Agreement, under the following terms and conditions.
1. Member purchase price shall be: San Diego Gas & Electric applicable tariff plus one cent
per kWh, less all applicable Energy Commission credits, rebated in advance and
incorporated into the bill amount. (For example, should the tariff be ten cents for kWh, and
the applicable credit is 1.5 cents per kWh, the bill would be calculated as follows: ten cents
plus one cent minus 1.5 cents for a net billed amount of 9.5 cents per kWh.)
2. Member shall have two options regarding the accounts listed on the attached pages, and
shall indicate which option it chooses by having the signator to this addendum initial within
the box preceding the option it chooses.
Option A
CEC will monitor the California Energy Commission Renewable Resource Trust
Fund account and the kWh consumption and costs for those accounts listed on the
attached pages and will automatically switch accounts which have reached the
maximum allowable savings created by the Renewable Resource Trust Fund
credits, and higher than those specified in the Commonwealth Energy Power
Services Agreement, back to the standard offer in the Agreement. The switching of
an account will occur at the first billing cycle after the maximum allowable savings
is reached.
Option B
Member shall have the right to switch any and all accounts subject to this
Agreement back to the standard offer, as outlined in the agreement that this
Attachment is made as an addendum, at its sole discretion, with thirty -day written
notice, upon the occurrence of either of the following events:
a) The California Energy Commission Resource Trust Fund credits are changed
from the current level of 1.5 cents per kWh or discontinued; or
b) The account has reached its maximum allowable annual credit, if applicable.
05/10/99
3. All other terms of the original agreement shall be in full force and effect, unless such terms
are in conflict with the Attachment A. In such an event, the terms of this Attachment A
shall prevail.
4. CEC shall deliver Green Power to Member with generation from the Sonoma Geysers
Plants operated by Calphine Corporation and sold to CEC pursuant to an agreement valid
from May 1, 1999 through June 30, 2002. Should this supply agreement be in full effect
after June 30, 2002, CEC shall either extend its arrangement with Calphine to meet
Member's needs, or substitute the power with a similarly qualified power source.
The undersigned agree as outlined above.
Frederick M. Bloom Member
Commonwealth Energy Corporation Name of Signator:
Name of Agency:
George H. Waters, Mayor
City of National City
05/10/99
ATTACHMENT TO GREEN POWER ADDENDUM
Member Agency Accounts to be Serviced with Green Power
Member Agency Name:
Date:
Account #
All San Diego Regional Power Pool Accounts.
Only the Following Accounts:
Meter # Meter Address
05/10/99
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE September 7, 1999
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A TIME EXTENSION FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1998-4 GRANTED TO GTE MOBILNET OF SAN DIEGO FOR
A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 2005 E. 4TH STREET (EL TOYON PARK).
CASE FILE NO. CUP-1998-4
PREPARED BY Ron Santos DEPARTMENT Planning
EXPLANATION
Council approved this CUP, per Resolution No. 98-109 (copy attached), on Septem-
ber 15, 1998. It will expire on September 15, 1999 unless a time extension is granted. GTE, the project
applicant, requests a one-year time extension.
An adopted condition of approval requires a lease agreement between the City and the applicant as a
prerequisite to installation of the proposed facility. To date, the terms of the lease have not been finalized.
The applicant requests the additional time in order to pursue attainment of a lease from the City and thus
comply with conditions of the CUP.
Section 18.116.190-B of the Municipal Code allows the permit granting body (Council) to extend the
expiration date, upon good cause shown by the applicant, for a period not to exceed one year. This first
extension requires no public hearing or public notice. Additional time extensions may be approved fol-
lowing a public hearing.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the attached Resolution, extending the expiration date of Conditional Use Permit No. 1998-4 by one
year to September 15, 2000. ryfc '
N/A
Account No.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below )
Resolution No. 99-134
1. Draft Resolution, approving time extension 3. Request for Time Extension Letter
2. Resolution No. 98-109, approving CUP-1998-4 4. Location Map
A-200 (9/80)
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 134
RESOLUTION OF LWI CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A TIME
EXTENSION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1998-4
GRANTED TO GTE MOBILNET OF SAN DIEGO FOR
A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT
2005 EAST 4TH STREET (EL TOYON PARK)
WHEREAS, on September 15, 1998, the City Council approved Conditional Use
Permit (CUP) No. 1998-4 for the installation of a wireless communications facility at 2005 East
4th Street (El Toyon Park) by GTE Mobilnet of San Diego; and
WHEREAS, CUP No. 1998-4 is due to expire on September 15, 1999; and
WHEREAS, an adopted condition of approval for the CUP requires a lease
agreement between the City and GTE Mobilnet prior to installation of the facility; and
WHEREAS, the terms of the lease agreement have not been finalized; and
WHEREAS, GTE Mobilnet has requested an extension of time, not to exceed one
year, in order to attain a lease from the City and thus comply with conditions of the CUP.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby grants GTE Mobilnet of San Diego a time extension, not to exceed one
year, for Conditional Use Permit No. 1998-4, which was granted to GTE Mobilnet of San Diego
for a wireless communications facility at 2005 East 4th Street (El Toyon Park).
PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1999.
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
2ar
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
George H. Waters, Mayor
RESOLUTION NO. 98-109
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS
COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 2005 E. 4th STREET (EL TOYON PARK)
APPLICANT: GTE MOBILNET OF SAN DIEGO
CASE FILE NO.: CUP-1998-4
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit
application for a wireless communications facility at 2005 E. 4th Street, at the regularly scheduled City
Council meeting of September 8, 1998 at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented;
and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the City Council considered the staff report prepared for Case
File No. CUP-1998-4 which is maintained by the City, and incorporated herein by reference; and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State and City
law; and,
WHEREAS, this action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public
health, safety and general welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City,
California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council at the public hearing held on
September 8, 1998, support the following findings:
1. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, and sufficient area exists to
accommodate the proposed facility without reducing the net usable area of the park
grounds, since the proposed monopole will replace an existing light standard and the
proposed equipment building will be recessed into a sloped embankment unusable for
general recreation.
2. The site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since
access to the property is provided from U Avenue and the unmanned wireless
communications facility is expected to generate a minimal amount of additional traffic.
3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since
the project involves only a negligible addition to established structures and construction of a
small building adequately separated and screened from views afforded adjacent properties.
4. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare,
since the facility will enhance and/or augment the availability of wireless communication
channels.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
Resolution No.: 98-11,:,
Page: 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application is approved subject to the following
conditions:
1. A cost estimate shall be submitted along with development plans. A performance bond equal to
the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading and retaining wall work shall be
posted. Three percent of the estimated cost shall be deposited with the City as an initial cost for
plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject
to adjustment.
2 Development Plans submitted for Building Permits must conform with the 1994 Editions of the
Uniform Building Code, Uniform Mechanical Code, and Uniform Plumbing Code; and the 1993
Edition of the National Electrical Code.
3. Exterior walls of the proposed equipment building shall be treated with "Graffiti Melt Coating"
manufactured by Genesis Coatings, Inc. A similar product may be used, subject to approval
from the Building and Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its
observance.
4. The path of any and all underground cables and utilities associated with the proposed facility
shall be modified as necessary to avoid conflict with any existing or future underground
facilities installed by the City. The applicant shall coordinate planning and installation of any
such underground facilities with the Parks and Recreation Department, the Public Works
Department and Sweetwater Authority as necessary per the respective determination of each
office.
5. The applicant shall provide the Public Works Department the opportunity to evaluate, repair
and/or replace the light fixture intended to be relocated to the proposed monopole at the time the
fixture is removed.
6. Permittee shall be granted non-exclusive right of ingress and egress, seven days a week, twenty-
four hours a day for the installation, maintenance, repair and upgrade of the facility. For all non-
scheduled, emergency visits, Permittee shall notify the Parks and Recreation Department
("Parks") of Permittee's site visit within two hours of such event. Permittee shall notify the
Parks at least four hours in advance of any routinely scheduled, non -emergency maintenance or
service to the facility for such visits that do not occur during normal park hours. Permittee will
provide Parks with a maintenance schedule if applicable.
7. The proposed equipment building shall be of masonry construction with stucco finish, painted
and roofed to match score shacks existing on site.
8. The proposed monopole shall have a non -reflective finish matching that of other light poles
existing in the park.
9. The permittee shall not object to co -locating additional facilities of other communication
companies and sharing the project site, provided such shared use does not result in substantial
technical or quality -of -service impairment for the permitted use. In the event a dispute arises
with regard to co -locating with other existing or potential users, the City may require a third
party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant or the complaining user. This
condition in no way obligates the City to approve any co -location proposal if it is determined by
the City not to be desirable in a specific case.
Resolution No.: 98-10i
Page: 3
10. If use of the equipment building, antennas and any other equipment authorized by this
Conditional Use Permit is discontinued for a period of six or more consecutive months, it shall
be removed by the applicant. This requirement shall not apply to the monopole, which shall be
maintained or replaced with a substitute suitable for supporting required light fixtures, per the
determination of the Director of Public Works.
11. Except as required by conditions of approval, development plans shall be submitted for review
and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit A -Revised, Case File No.
CUP-1998-4, dated 06/22/98.
12. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant shall sign and have
notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and
accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed
and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the
Conditional Use Permit.
13. Use of the property as authorized by this Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to the
installation of a wireless communications facility consisting of a 97'-8" tall monopole
supporting 12 panel antennas and three whip antennas, and one 12' x 16' x 12'-8" equipment
building, as incidental use of the property.
14. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the
resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190
of the National City Municipal Code.
15. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant shall negotiate a City
Council approved lease agreement authorizing use of the property.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution shall be transmitted forthwith to
the applicant; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day
following the City Council meeting where the resolution is adopted. The time within which judicial
review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of September, 1998.
ATTEST:
MIC EL R. DAL
CITY
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
GEORGE H. EISER, III -CITY ATTORNEY
GEORGE . WATERS, MAYOR
Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California, on September 15,
1998, by the following vote, to -wit:
Ayes: Councilmembers Beauchamp, Inzunza, Morrison, Zarate, Waters.
Nays: None.
Absent: None.
Abstain: None.
AUTHENTICATED BY: GEORGE H. WATERS
Mayor of the City of National City, California
MICHAEL R. DALLA
City Clerk of the City of National City, California
By:
Deputy
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO. 98-109 of the City of National City, California, passed and adopted by the
Council of said City on September 15, 1998.
sf P 5 a z
i �Lor
a 0_ ys
ate:.
iv
Jerk of the
Cit
y ty ofNational City, California
By:
Deputy
-DIVISION
P
U
—
EL TOYON
SCHOOL
IC -OS
MAP
!66
,.. PROPOSED ANTENNA __=-
EQUIPMENT BUILDING_ __-
------------------
\_ _ _ _- _ _ _ _ _-_-_—_—_—_-_- - _ _ — - -- -_—_----- --- -_- —_---
\ _ ___- ___________ _ _-_ _-_-_- -_-_-_-_- -_- - - ---- --- --- ------
EL TOYON
PARK
---------- 4th --
STREET
210 I a• 20E I WI
21
"t ^ A
O
MELROS
4
2nd
=--------------
---------------
RS-2
*•
O
Sze
N
,kita
e..
•
V
0
N
00
i
.
A I
W
_ N
T N.
N
• N
N
N
N I
N
J
_•
-1
..
—
424
•
a ..
vs
L.
• PROPOSED FACILITY
•
'ZONE BOUNDARY
2
SCALE:
1" = 200"
NORTH
0 50 100
FEET
LOCATION MAP
CUP-1998-4
NATIONAL CITY PLANNING
DRN. DATE:
06/30/98
REVISIONS:
HEARING:
07/20/98
L1 A V n 1
LETTIERI-McINTYRE AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
August 23, 1999
Mr. Ron Santos
City of National City
Planning Department
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 92050-4397
NATIONAL CITY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AU6 2 41999
SUBJECT: GTE — EXTENSION OF TIME FOR CUP 1998-4 (El Toyon Park/43`d
Street)
Dear Ron:
On behalf of GTE Wireless, I have prepared this letter to provide justification for the
extension of time requested by GTE Wireless for Conditional Use Permit (CUP) 1998-4
for a wireless communication facility at 2005 E. 4th Street (El Toyon Park) which expires
on September 15, 1999 unless an extension of time is approved. As you are aware, the
project site, El Toyon Park, is owned by the City of National City and as such, approval
of a City lease is required in addition to CUP 1998-4. GTE and the City of National City
have been working together to finalize the lease for the proposed wireless facility. at
Toyon Park. Since the lease has not yet been approved by the City Council, GTE has not
been able to construct the proposed facility in accordance with CUP 1998-4. GTE is
therefore requesting approval of an extension of time for CUP 1998-4 to allow time to
obtain City Council approval of the required lease.
Please do not hesitate to call me if you need any additional information on this matter.
Sincerely,
LETTIERI-MCINTYRE AND ASSOCIATES
Deborah L. Collins, AICP
Senior Project Manager
CC: Bob Wojcik, GTE WTS
Mary Hamilton, GTE WTS
S\PLANNING\PAOJECT419\43rd St.doc
1551 Fourth Avenue, Suite 430, San Diego, California 92101-3152 / (619) 238-4241 / FAX (619) 238-9772
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE 09/07/99 AGENDA ITEM NO.
1 ITEM TITLE
WARRANT REGISTER #08
PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE
EXPLANATION -
Ratification of Warrant Register #08
per government section code 37208.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement N/A
Account No
TAFF RECO ENDATION
I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $268,675.87
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
614(427-:
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. Warrant Register #08
2. Workers' Comp Warrant Register dated 8/18/99
Resolution No.
A-200 (Rev. 9/80(
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE 09/07/99 AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE
WARRANT REGISTER #09
PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE
EXPLANATION.
Ratification of Warrant Register #09
per government section code 37208..
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No
STAFF RECO ENDATION Cl
I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $7,187,279.70
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
4 dal(Z2e-C/
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. Warrant Register #09
2. Workers' Comp Warrant. Register dated 8/25/99
INII•111111111111111111111••••1•1111••••••1111•11<
Resolution No.
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE September 7, 1992
AGENDA ITEM NO. 8
ITEM TITLE
CONSOLIDATED CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT AS OFJUNE 30, 1999
PREPARED BY C. Fredricks DEPARTMENT
EXPLANATION.
For the City Council's information and in compliance with the City's investment policy, the consolidated
cash and investment report as of June 30, 1999 is hereby submitted. This report reflects the components
of the investment portfolio as of June 30, 1999 and the results of the investment program for the period
then ended. The investment portfolio provides for sufficient liquidity to meet the following month's
estimated expenditures.
Finance
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
Not applicable.
oo J,
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
We recommend that the report be accepted and filed.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
TT
2. Investment Summary by Maturity Date.
3. Investment Summary by Investment Type.
4. Consolidated Cash Report.
uAtLYtelchlif.low)
Account No.
5. Monthly AlkstiiiMilnfebistiptc
6. Monthly Statement of Disbursements.
7. Pooled Investment Transactions Report.
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CASH ACCOUNT SUMMARY
June 1999
REVOLVING CASH
RETURNED CHECKS
BANK OF AMERICA #80200
OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
PAYROLL OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
INVESTMENTS
BALANCE
$ 3,636.78
2,872.29
135,961.45
-670,732.41
-16,736.43
29, 784,193.60
TOTAL $ 29,239,195.28
INVESTMENT EARNINGS HISTORY:
FISCAL YEAR YEAR-TO-DATE
1998-99
1997-98
1996-97
1995-96
1994-95
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
1990-91
1989-90
1988-89
1987-88
1986-87
1985-86
1984-85
$ 1,345,390.64 $
1,478,232.91
1,256,907.31
974,113.25
1,001,709.56
1,011,586.52
721,913.49
864,052.63
1,303,878.52
1, 544, 993.71
1,311, 930.94
979,435.87
1,048,978.23
1,321,688.93
1,543,266.30
TOTAL YEAR
1,345,390.64
1,478, 232.91
1,256,907.31
974,113.25
1,001,709.56
1,011,586.52
721,913.49
864, 052.63
1,303,878.52
1, 544, 993.71
1,311,930.94
979,435.87
1,048,978.23
1,321,688.93
1,543,266.30
0699_2revised.xls
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
TYPE INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST a 12 MONTHS RAZE
Certificate of Deposit California Pacific Bank 6/16/98 6/16/99 99,000.00 99,490.19 N/A 5.700%
Certificate of Deposit Commerical Pacific Bank 12/16/97 6/18/99 99,000.00 99,285.17 N/A 6.100%
Certificate of Deposit First Bank of Beverly Hills 7/1/98 7/1/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.920%
Certificate of Deposit International City Bank 7/16/98 7/16/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.970%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of Marin 7/16/98 7/16/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.900%
Certificate of Deposit South Bay Bank 3/18/98 7/26/99 92,637.95 92,637.95 N/A 5.860%
Certificate of Deposit Life Savings Bank 8/3/98 7/30/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.805%
Certificate of Deposit Signal Bank 11/2/98 8/9/99 96,619.58 96,619.58 N/A 6.460%
Certificate of Deposit First NB of Keystone 9/28/98 9/23/99 94,810.00 94,810.00 N/A 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit Advanta National Bank 9/29/98 9/29/99 100,000.00 100,000.00 N/A 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit TPEA No. 5 Credit Union 10/2/98 10/2/99 94,652.15 94,652.15 N/A 5.650%
Certificate of Deposit Johnson Bank 3/17/99 3/17/00 95,000.00 95,000.00 N/A 6.250%
Certificate of Deposit Home Savings of America 9/25/98 3/25/00 75,433.08 75,433.08 N/A 6.510%
FNMA Bonds
Callable Bonds Finance 500 12/1/98 4/1/00 101,000.81 3,555.39 73,617.79 N/A 5.650%
Certificate of Deposit Washington Fs & La 9/29/98 4/3/00 100,000.00 100,000.00 N/A 5.840%
Certificate of Deposit Grand Bank, N.A. 5/17/99 5/16/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.530%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 9/17/97 6/1/00 58,289.73 1,507.06 25,284.30 N/A 6.290%
Certificate of Deposit Old Florida Bank 6/3/99 6/2/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.700%
Certificate of Deposit Peoples Bank of Kentucky 6/4/99 6/5/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Habersham Bank 6/10/99 6/9/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Security State Bk of Wanamingo 6/10/99 6/9/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.750%
FNMA Callable Bonds Mlschler Financial Group, Inc. 6/24/98 6/23/00 100,000.00 105,787.00 N/A 5.750%
FNMA Bonds Finance 500 6/26/98 6/26/00 200,000.00 200,000.00 N/A 5.770%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 6/26/98 6/26/00 100,000.00 100,000.00 N/A 5.770%
FNMA Pass Thru Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 6/22/98 7/1/00 231,615.59 6,668.34 142,556.46 138,963.00 5.790%
Page 1 of 9
TYPE
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Gold Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Certificate of Deposit
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
Certificate of Deposit
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Ameribanc Savings Bank
GNMA Bonds
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION
Golden Security Thrift & Loan Bank
Nazarene Credit Union
Capital One FSB
Cedar Rapids ECU
Metropolitan FSB
Erie State Bank
MultiBank Securites, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Cross Country Bank
Key Bank USA
Eaton Bank
Winston Savings & Loans, Ohio
Ashburn Bank
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
First National Bank of Jackson
Mischler Financial Group, Inc.
Merrick Banking Corporation
Mischler Financial Group, Inc.
The Park Avenue Bank, N.A.
Corn Belt B&T Co.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE
DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE
7/28/98 7/28/00 90,000.00
9/25/98 9/25/00 92,155.52
9/29/98 9/29/00 100,000.00
10/1/98 10/1/00 89,576.91
9/29/98 10/2/00 100,000.00
5/14/99 11/14/00 99,000.00
10/30/98 12/1/00 145,497.77
2/18/98 3/1/01 20,510.44
2/18/98 3/1/01 12,253.37
4/2/99 4/2/01 100,000.00
4/5/99 4/5/01 99,000.00
4/29/99 4/30/01 99,000.00
5/7/99 5/7/01 99,000.00
5/11/99 5/11/01 99,000.00
3/23/99 5/15/01 69,954.91
2/18/98 5/20/01 20,056.84
5/20/99 5/21/01 99,000.00
6/17/99 6/19/01 100,000.00
6/21/99 6/21/01 99,000.00
6/23/99 6/21/01 100,033.33
6/24/99 6/25/01 99,000.00
6/28/99 6/28/01 99,000.00
11/21/97 7/20/01 29,989.48
AMOUNT
MATURED
FOR CURRENT
MONTH
CARRYING
COST
CURRENT
MARKET VALUE
IF MATURITY
>12 MONTHS
INTEREST
RATE
90,000.00 90,000.00 5.980%
92,155.52 92,155.52 5.680%
100,000.00 100,000.00 5.790%
89,576.91 89,576.91 5.810%
100,000.00 100,000.00 5.900%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.500%
14,004.35 69,611.49 63,646,00 5.850%
913.56 9,770.82 8,182.00 5.800%
497.63 8,106.92 7,519.00 6.210%
100,000.00 100,000.00 5.580%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
1,640.89 34,474.81 33,092.00 5.820%
576.06 12,281.11 11,917.00 6.110%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.800%
100,000.00 99,786.00 6.000%
99,000.00 99,000.00 6.000%
100,033.33 99,784.00 6.000%
99,000.00 99,000.00 6.050%
99,000.00 99,000.00 6.200%
772.45 18,548.34 18,031.00 5.790%
Page 2 of 9
TYPE
Multiple Issuer GNMA Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Certificate of Deposit
GMAC Mortgage Corp.
GNMA Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Certificate of Deposit
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Citizen Fidelity GNMA Bonds
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Criterion Financial GNMA Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
GNMA Bonds
TransOhio Savings Bank
GNMA Bonds
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Hometown Bank, NA
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
TeleBank, Arlington,VA
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc.
Gilford Securities
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RATE
10/30/97 8/15/01 34,504.40 775.93 19,736.02 19,210.00 5.970%
2/18/98 9/1/01 17,688.43 453.55 9,429.37 7,401.00 5.950%
2/18/98 10/1/01 27,354.25 569.99 14,775.05 13,651.00 6.350%
11/20/98 10/8/01 85,328.46 85,328.46 85,328.46 5.960%
8/26/97 10/15/01 22,518,00 301.69 7,954.61 7,384.00 6.020%
2/18/98 11/1/01 33,838.46 2,184.37 18,088.01 14,793.00 6.380%
5/6/99 11/5/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.660%
3/23/98 11/15/01 70,974.64 775.31 20,945.28 18,607.00 5.870%
3/23/98 11/15/01 50,765.94 889.09 24,483.56 23,325.00 6.030%
10/21/97 11/20/01 33,297.82 1,126.65 15,933.48 15,137.00 5.920%
8/26/97 12/15/01 18,164.07 211.86 5,477.05 4,968.00 6.020%
3/26/99 12/15/01 47,144.76 1,108.65 28,262.99 27,758.00 6.460%
6/17/99 12/17/01 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 6.140%
6/17/99 12/17/01 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,052.00 6.140%
10/15/97 12/20/01 38,822.67 630.43 17,123.96 16,192.00 5.870%
2/18/98 1/1/02 17,831.50 222.57 9,082.45 8,314.00 5.970%
2/18/98 1/1/02 24,437.06 348.57 10,575.56 9,939.00 5.940%
10/30/97 1/15/02 48,805.26 1,045.87 23,345.34 22,336.00 5.970%
10/21/97 1/20/02 39,863.99 774.60 19,732.40 18,802.00 5.820%
2/18/98 2/1/02 14,437.11 235.97 6,166.19 5,783.00 6.130%
Page 3 of 9
TYPE
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
United Mortgage Corp.
GNMA Bonds
GNMA Pass Thru Pool
Certificate of Deposit
Colonial Mortgage Company
GNMA Bonds
Certificate of Deposit
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
First Union Bank
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Corus Bank
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
First Bank & Trust
Queens County Savings Bank
Insouth Bank
First National Bank of Elk River
First Bank of Richmond
Argo Federal Savings Bank
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
First National Bank of America
Assoc Nat'l Bank of Delaware
First National Bank of Lucedale
Michigan Heritage Bank
Flagstar Bank
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Finance 500
Gilford Securities
Finance 500
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE
DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE
11/21/97 2/20/02 81,701.86
11/12/97 3/15/02 39,267.48
4/15/98 3/15/02 46,094.68
2/23/99 3/23/02 84,801.52
12/23/97 4/1/02 40,796.39
4/16/99 4/16/02 95,000.00
4/15/98 4/20/02 51,272.18
4/28/99 4/21/02 85,276.39
4/20/99 4/22/02 99,000.00
4/21/99 4/22/02 99,000.00
4/22/99 4/22/02 99,000.00
4/29/99 4/29/02 99,000.00
4/30/99 4/30/02 99,000.00
2/18/98 5/1/02 32,364.87
5/6/99 5/6/02 95,000.00
5/6/99 5/6/02 100,000.00
5/12/99 5/13/02 97,000.00
5/13/99 5/13/02 99,000.00
5/14/99 5/14/02 95,000.00
3/23/98 5/20/02 39,432.64
5/24/99
5/27/99
12/10/98
5/24/02
5/27/02
6/10/02
100,000.00
100,000.00
100,000.00
AMOUNT
MATURED
FOR CURRENT
MONTH
CURRENT.
MARKET VALUE
CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
COST >12 MONTHS RATE
1,155.08 32,670.26 32,670.26 5.920%
651.97 20,416.73 19,773.00 6.000%
10,252.59 24,780.22 24,011.00 6.200%
84,801.52 84,801.52 5.820%
251.33 20,219.98 19,474.00 5.910%
95,000.00 95,000.00 5.450%
1,761.69 28,108.01 26,175.00 5.910%
85,276.39 85,276.39 5.750%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.650%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
724.97 23,831.27 22,786.00 5.800%
95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500%,
100,000.00 100,000.00 5.850%
97,000.00 97,000.00 5.500%
99,000.00 99,000.00 5.700%
95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500%
1,391.22 19, 221.64 18, 363.00 5.870%
100,000.00 98,875.00 5.685%
100,000.00 99,942.00 6.000%
100,000.00 99,000.00 5.780%
Page 4 of 9
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
TYPE INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS EASE
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 6/24/99 6/24/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,872.00 6.250%
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool MultiBank Securities, Inc. 4/15/98 7/15/02 45,796.99 6,563.95 21,555.67 20,571.00 5.990%
Certificate of Deposit New South Fed Savings Bank 2/23/99 8/12/02 97,154.93 97,154.93 97,154.93 5.300%
Certificate of Deposit Western Bank PR 3/3/99 9/3/02 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.400%
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool MultiBank Securities, Inc. 11/12/97 9/15/02 35,756.95 607.68 19,893.00 19,360.00 6.050%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 11/25/97 9/20/02 49,829.57 782.55 25,871.90 24,714.00 6.100%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 3/23/99 9/23/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,711.00 5.940%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 5/12/99 11/12/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,406.00 5.740%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Paine Weber 11/25/98 11/25/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,391.00 5.640%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 5/27/99 11/27/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,529.00 5.930%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gifford Securities 5/27/99 11/27/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,496.00 5.910%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Vining Sparks 5/27/99 11/27/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.930%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 12/2/98 12/2/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,043.00 5.770%
Certificate of Deposit Steel Parts Federal Credit Union 11/6/98 12/3/02 79,823.99 79,823.99 79,823.99 6.200%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Paine Weber 6/3/99 12/3/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,172.00 6.000%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 12/9/98 12/9/02 125,000.00 125,000.00 123,943.00 5.860%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 6/9/99 12/9/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,492.00 6.000%
Federal Home Loan Bank.
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 1/6/99 1/6/03 150,000.00 150,000.00 152,945.00 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit MBNA 3/3/99 3/3/03 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.400%
Page 5 of 9
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
TYPE INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RATE
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 3/18/99 3/18/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,731.00 6.050%
Freddie Mac
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 4/7/99 4/7/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,275.00 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit State Bank of India 2/18/99 7/1/03 99,311.66 99,311.66 99,311.66 5.410%
Freddie Mac
Callable Bonds Finance 500 12/1/98 8/1/03 100,500.00 100,500.00 93,928.19 6.010%
Certificate of Deposit Nations Bank 11/23/98 8/4/03 99,000.00 99,000.00 . 99,000.00 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit Farmers Bank 10/2/98 10/2/03 75,948.98 75,948.98 75,948.98 6.330%
Certificate of Deposit State Bank of Texas 10/2/98 10/2/03 75,948.98 75,948.98 75,948.98 6.330%
FNMA Callable Bonds Finance 500 10/22/98 10/22/03 250,000.00 250,000.00 244,687.50 6.040%
FNMA Callable Bonds MultiBank Securites, Inc. 10/22/98 10/22/03 250,000.00 250,000.00 247,650.00 6.040%
Certificate of Deposit Signet Bank 3/1/99 10/29/03 99,914,75 99,914.75 99,914.75 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Orchard Fed Savings Bank 11/4/98 11/4/03 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Gold Coast Federal Credit Union 11/6/98 11/6/03 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.750%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Finance 500 11/17/98 11/17/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,750.00 5.790%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securites, Inc. 11/24/98 11/24/03 115,000.00 115,000.00 112,892.00 5.730%
Federal Farm Credit
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securites, Inc. 11/24/98 11/24/03 250,000.00 250,000.00 244,420.00 5.850%
FNMA Callable Bonds Gifford Securities 11/25/98 11/25/03 100,000,00 100,000.00 98,394.50 6.020%
FHLB Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 11/25/98 11/25/03 150,000.00 150,000.00 148,416.00 6.000%
FHLB Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 11/25/98 11/25/03 150,000.00 150,000.00 147,640.00 5.830%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Finance 500 12/1/98 12/1/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,062.00 5.910%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 12/1/98 12/1/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,619.00 5.930%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 12/2/98 12/2/03 125,000.00 125,000.00 122,751.00 5.800%
Page 6 of 9
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
TTTYPS INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS BALE
Certificate of Deposit Royal Bank of Pennsylvania 12/1/98 12/2/03 76,325.98 76,325.98 76,325.98 6.200%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 12/4/98 12/4/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,393.00 6.000%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Finance 500 12/21/98 12/4/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,250.00 5.970%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 12/4/98 12/4/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,746.00 5.880%
Certificate of Deposit Dora! FSB 12/10/98 12/10/03 98,384.22 98,384.22 98,384.22 6.000%
FHLMC Bonds
Callable Bonds Finance 500 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,781.00 5.820%
Freddie Mac
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,927.00 5.820%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,455.00 5.660%
FHLMC Bonds
Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,875.00 5.820%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 12/23/98 12/23/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,596.00 5.710%
Certificate of Deposit IBJ Schroeder Bank & Trust Co 12/23/98 12/23/03 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.550%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 1/5/99 1/5/04 200,000.00 200,000.00 202,333.00 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit Bank & Trust Puerto Rico (NY) 1/28/99 1/27/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.300%
Certificate of Deposit The Comm Bank of Ravenswood 1/28/99 1/28/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.350%
FNMA Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 2/18/99 2/18/04 99,500.00 99,500.00 96,191,00 5.500%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 2/24/99 2/24/04 150,000.00 150,000.00 148,798.00 5.795%
Certificate of Deposit Wilmington Trust Co 3/8/99 2/26/04 76,570.64 76,570.64 76,570.64 6.150%
FNMA Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 3/2/99 3/2/04 250,000.00 250,000.00 244,170.00 6.020%
Certificate of Deposit San Jose National Bank 3/3/99 3/3/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.400%
Certificate of Deposit Independent Bank W. Michigan 3/15/99 3/4/04 95,171.78 95,171.78 95,171.78 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit Truman Bank 3/8/99 3/5/04 76,462.13 76,462.13 76,462.13 6.150%
Page 7 of 9
TYPE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RASE
FHLMC Bonds
Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 3/8/99 3/8/04 150,000.00 150,000.00 148,500.00 6.300%
FHLMC Bonds
Callable Bonds Finance 500 3/8/99 3/8/04 150,000.00 150,000.00 148,359.00 6.300%
Certificate of Deposit F.C.C. National Bank 3/10/99 3/10/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.700%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Paine Weber 3/15/99 3/15/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,172.00 6.000%,
Certificate of Deposit Greenwood Trust 3/17/99 3/17/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.600%,
Certificate of Deposit Standard Federal Bank 3/22/99 3/22/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit Lake Forest Bank & Trust 4/6/99 3/26/04 95,158.90 95,158.90 95,158.90 5.550%
Certificate of Deposit Libertyville Bank & Trust 4/6/99 3/26/04 95,158.90 95,158.90 95,158.90 5.550%
Certificate of Deposit Household Bank 4/7/99 4/7/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Fremont Investment & Loans 4/7/99 4/7/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.600%,
Certificate of Deposit LSI Federal Credit Union 4/22/99 4/21/04 76,491.40 76,491.40 76,491.40 6.140%
FNMA Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 4/23/99 4/26/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,663.00 6.020%
FNMA Callable Bonds Finance 500 - 4/23/99 4/26/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 93,928.19 6.020%
Certificate of Deposit Transportation Alliance Bank 5/3/99 5/3/04 76,141.57 76,141.57 76,141.57 6.260%
Certificate of Deposit Bankers Trust 5/20/99 5/3/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.750%
FHLMC Callable Bonds Finance 500 5/3/99 5/3/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,312.00 6.105%
FHLMC Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 5/10/99 5/10/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,245.00 6.140%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 5/24/99 5/24/04 250,000.00 250,000.00 246,562.50 6.185%
Certificate of Deposit Merrill Lynch Bank USA 5/27/99 6/1/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit Provident Bank, Baltimore, MD 1/21/99 7/21/04 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit European American Bank 2/4/99 8/4/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Peoples Bank 2/10/99 8/10/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 2/18/98 11/1/04 61,454.05 1,109.64 19,726.18 18,117.00 6.100%
Certificate of Deposit Bank of Mt. Vernon 2/26/99 9/14/05 69,971.36 69,971.36 69,971.36 6.550%
Page 8 of 9
TYPE
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Certificate of Deposit
Cash Held by Broker
Cash Held by Broker
Cash Held by Broker
Local Agency Investment Fund
Total Investments
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION
Manufacturers & Traders Trust
Centura National Bank
M&I Marshall & Isley Bank
Old NB in Evansville
St. Francis Bank, F.S.B.
Lasalle Bank National Assoc
Lasalle Bank National Assoc
Finance 500
Paine Weber
Gilford Securities
State of California Treasurer
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
June 1999
DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE
DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE
3/4/99 2/24/06 93,229.72
3/9/99 9/9/06 95,000.00
1/27/99 1/27/09 94,818.55
1/28/99 1/28/09 94,772.00
1/29/99 1/29/09 94,525.00
2/3/99 4/26/11 49,892.00
1/25/99 1/25/14 95,000.00
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A N/A
AMOUNT
MATURED
FOR CURRENT
MONTH
CARRYING
COST
CURRENT
MARKET VALUE
IF MATURITY
> 12 MONTHS
INTEREST
RATE
93,229.72 93,229.72 5.850%
95,000,00 95,000.00 6.000%
94,818.55 94,818.55 6.250%
94,772.00 94,772.00 6.250%
94,525.00 94,525.00 6.520%
49,892.00 49,892.00 8.210%
95,000.00 95,000.00 6.650%
6,465.39 N/A 4.040%
6.60 N/A 4.410%
11,480.00 N/A N/A
13,699,081.06 N/A 5.095%
29,784,193.60
Page 9 of 9
TYPE
FNMA Bonds
Callable Bonds
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
FNMA Callable Bonds
FNMA Bonds
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
FNMA Pass Thru Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Gold Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
Ameribanc Savings Bank
GNMA Bonds
Multiple Issuer GNMA Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
GMAC Mortgage Corp.
GNMA Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
FINANCIAL
JNSTITUTION
Finance 500
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Mischler Financial Group, inc.
Finance 500
Gilford Securities
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Mischler Financial Group, Inc.
Mischler Financial Group, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
DATE OF
DEPOSIT
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
DATE OF
MATURITY
PURCHASE
PRICE
12/1/98 4/1/00 101,000.81
9/17/97 6/1/00 58,289.73
AMOUNT
MATURED
FOR CURRENT
MONTH
CARRYING
COST
CURRENT
MARKET VALUE
IF MATURITY
> 12 MONTHS
INTEREST
RATE
3,555.39 73,617.79 N/A 5.650%
1,507.06 25,284.30 N/A 6.290%
6/24/98 6/23/00 100,000.00 105,787.00
6/26/98 6/26/00 200,000.00
6/26/98 6/26/00 100,000.00
6/22/98 7/1/00 231,615.59
10/30/98 12/1/00 145,497.77
2/18/98 3/1/01 20,510.44
2/18/98 3/1/01 12,253.37
3/23/98 5/15/01 69,954.91
2/18/98 5/20/01 20,056.84
6/17/99 6/19/01 100,000.00
6/23/99 6/21/01 100,033.33
11/21/97 7/20/01 29,989.48
10/30/97 8/15/01 34,504.40
2/18/98 9/1/01 17,688.43
2/18/98 10/1/01 27,354.25
8/26/97 10/15/01 22,518.00
2/18/98 11/1/01 33,838.46
N/A 5.750%
200,000.00 N/A 5.770%
100,000.00 N/A 5.770%
6,668.34 142,556.46 138,963.00 5.790%
14,004.35 69,611.49 63,646.00 5.850%
913.56 9,770.82 8,182.00 5.800%
497.63 8,106.92 7,519.00 6.210%
1,640.89 34,474.81 33,092,00 5.820%
576.06 12,281.11 11,917.00 6.110%
100,000.00 99,786.00 6.000%
100,033.33 99,784.00 6.000%
772.45 18,548.34 18,031.00 5.790%
775.93 19,736.02 19,210.00 5.970%
453.55 9,429.37 7,401.00 5.950%
569.99 14,775.05 13,651.00 6.350%
301.69 7,954.61 7,384.00 6.020%
2,184.37 18,088.01 14,793.00 6.380%
Page 1 of 9
TYPE
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Citizen Fidelity GNMA Bonds
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Criterion Financial GNMA Bonds
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
GNMA Bonds
TransOhio Savings Bank
GNMA Bonds
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
United Mortgage Corp.
GNMA Bonds
GNMA Pass Thru Pool
Colonial Mortgage Company
GNMA Bonds
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Bonds
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Gifford Securities
Morgan Keegan & Co., Inc
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Finance 500
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RATE
3/23/98 11/15/01 70,974.64 775.31 20,945.28 18,607.00 5.870%
3/23/98 11/15/01 50,765.94 889.09 24,483.56 23,325.00 6.030%
10/21/97 11/20/01 33,297.82 1,126.65 15,933.48 15,137.00 5.920%
8/26/97 12/15/01 18,164.07 211.86 5,477.05 4,968.00 6.020%
3/23/98 12/15/01 47,144.76 1,108.65 28,262.99 27,758.00 6.460%
6/17/99 12/17/01 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,052.00 6.140%
6/17/99 12/17/01 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 6.140%
10/15/97 12/20/01 38,822.67 630.43 17,123.96 16,192.00 5.870%
2/18/98 1/1/02 17,831.50 222.57 9,082.45 8,314.00 5.970%
2/18/98 1/1/02 24,437.06 348.57 10,575.56 9,939.00 5.940%
10/30/97 1/15/02 48,805.26 1,045.87 23,345.34 22,326.00 5.970%
10/21/97 1/20/02 39,863.99 774.60 19,732.40 18,802.00 5.820%
2/18/98 2/1/02 14,437.11 235.97 6,166.19 5,783.00 6.130%
11/21/97 2/20/02 81,701.86. 1,155.08 32,670.26 32,670.26 5.920%
11/12/97 3/15/02 39,267.48 651.97 20,416.73 19,773.00 6.000%
4/15/98 3/15/02 46,094.68 10,252.59 24,780.22 24,011.00 6.200%
12/23/97 4/1/02 40,796.39 251.33 20,219.98 19,474.00 5.910%
4/15/98 4/20/02 51,272.18 1,761.69 28,108.01 26,175.00 5.910%
2/18/98 5/1/02 32,364.87 724.97 23,831.27 22,786.00 5.800%
3/23/98 5/20/02 39,432.64 1,391.22 19,221.64 18,363.00 5.870%
5/24/99 5/24/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,875.00 5.685%
Page 2 of 9
TYPE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RATE
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 5/27/99 5/27/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,942.00 6.000%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Finance 500 12/10/98 6/10/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,000.00 5.780%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gifford Securities 6/24/99 6/24/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,872.00 - 6.250%
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool MultiBank Securities, Inc. 4/15/98 7/15/02 45,796.99 6,563.95 21,555.67 20,571.00 5.990%
GNMA Bonds Pass Thru Pool MultiBank Securities, Inc. 11/12/97 9/15/02 35,756.95 607.68 19,893.00 19,360.00 6.050%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 11/25/97 9/20/02 49,829.57 782.55 25,871.90 24,714.00 6.100%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 3/23/99 9/23/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,711.00 5.940%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 5/12/99 11/12/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,406.00 5.740%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Paine Weber 11/25/98 11/25/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,391.00 5.640%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gifford Securities 5/27/99 11/27/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,529.00 5.930%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gifford Securities 5/27/99 11/27/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,496.00 5.910%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Vining Sparks 5/27/99 11/27/02 100,000.00 - 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.930%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 12/2/98 12/2/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,043.00 5.770%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Paine Weber 6/3/99 12/3/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,172.00 6.000%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 12/9/98 12/9/02 125,000.00 125,000.00 123,943.00 5.860%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 6/9/99 12/9/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,492.00 6.000%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 1/6/99 1/6/03 150,000.00 150,000.00 152,945.00 6.000%
Page 3 of 9
TYPE
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Freddie Mac
Callable Bonds
Freddie Mac
Callable Bonds
Federal National Mortgage Assoc
Callable Bonds
Federal National Mortgage Assoc
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Farm Credit
Callable Bonds
FNMA Callable Bonds
FHLB Callable Bonds
FHLB Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable bonds
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds
FHLMC Bonds
FINANCIAL
INSTITUTION
Gilford Securities
Gilford Securities
Finance 500
Finance 500
MultiBank Securities, Inc.
Finance 500
Multibank Securities, Inc.
Multibank Securities, Inc.
Gilford Securities
Gilford Securities
Gifford Securities
Finance 500
Gifford Securities
Multibank Securities, Inc.
Multibank Securities, Inc.
Finance 500
Multibank Securities, Inc.
DATE OF
DEPOSIT
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
DATE OF
MATURITY
PURCHASE
PRICE
3/18/99 3/18/03 100,000.00
4/7/99 4/7/03 100,000.00
12/1/98 8/1/03 100,500.00
10/22/98 10/22/03 250,000.00
10/22/98 10/22/03 250,000.00
11 / 17/98 11/17/03 100,000.00
11/24/98 11/24/03 115,000.00
11/24/98 11/24/03 250,000.00
11/25/98 11/25/03 100,000.00
11/25/98 11/25/03 150,000.00
11/25/98 11/25/03 150,000.00
12/1/98 12/1/03 100, 000.00
12/1/98 12/1/03 100,000.00
12/2/98 12/2/03 125,000.00
12/4/98 12/4/03 100,000.00
12/21/98 12/4/03 100,000.00
12/4/98 12/4/03 100,000.00
AMOUNT
MATURED
FOR CURRENT
MONTH
CARRYING
COST
CURRENT
MARKET VALUE
IF MATURITY
> 12 MONTHS
INTEREST
RATE
100,000.00 100,731.00 6.050%
100,000.00 100,275.00 6.000%
100,500.00 93,928.19 6.010%
250,000.00 244,687.50 6.040%
250,000.00 247,650.00 6.040%
100,000.00 97,750.00 5.790%
115,000.00 112,892.00 5.730%
250,000.00 244,420.00 5.850%
100,000.00 98,394.50 6.020%
150,000.00 148,416.00 6.000%
150,000.00 147,640.00 5.830%
100,000.00 98,062.00 5.910%
100,000.00 98,619.00 5.930%
125,000.00 122,751.00 5.800%
100,000.00 98,393.00 6.000%
100,000.00 98,250.00 5.970%
100,000.00 98,746.00 5.880%
Page 4 of 9
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
TYPE INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RATE
Callable Bonds Finance 500 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,781.00 5.820%
Freddie Mac
Callable Bonds Gifford Securities 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,927.00 5.820%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,455.00 5.660%
FHLMC Bonds
Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group Inc. 12/22/98 12/22/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,875.00 5.820%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 12/23/98 12/23/03 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,596.00 5.710%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 1/5/99 1/5/04 200,000.00 200,000.00 202,333.00 6.000%
FNMA Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group Inc. 2/18/99 2/18/04 99,500.00 99,500.00 96,191.00 5.500%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Multibank Securities, Inc. 2/24/99 2/24/04 150,000.00 150,000.00 148,798.00 5.795%
FNMA Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group Inc. 3/2/99 3/2/04 250,000.00 250,000.00 244,170.00 6.020%
FHLMC Bonds
Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group Inc. 3/8/99 3/8/04 150,000.00 150,000.00 148,500.00 6.300%
FHLMC Bonds
Callable Bonds Finance 500 3/8/99 3/8/04 150,000.00 150,000.00 148,359.00 6.300%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Paine Weber 3/15/99 3/15/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,172.00 6.000%
FNMA Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 4/23/99 4/26/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,663.00 6.020%
FNMA Callable Bonds Finance 500 4/23/99 4/26/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 93,928.19 6.020%
FHLMC Callable Bonds Finance 500 5/3/99 5/3/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 98,312.00 6.105%
FHLMC Callable Bonds Gilford Securities 5/10/99 5/10/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,245.00 6.140%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group Inc. 5/24/99 5/24/04 250,000.00 250,000.00 246,562.50 6.185%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 2/18/98 11/1/04 61,454.05 1,109.64 19,726.18 18,117.00 6.100%
Total U.S. Government Securities 7,716,691.55
Page 5 of 9
TYPE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS BRIE
Cash held by Broker Finance 500 N/A N/A N/A 6,465.39 N/A 4.040%
Cash held by Broker Paine Weber N/A N/A N/A 6.60 N/A 4.410%
Cash held by Broker Gifford Securities N/A N/A N/A 11,480.00 N/A N/A
Total Cash held by Broker 17,951.99
Certificate of Deposit California Pacific Bank 6/16/98 6/16/99 99,000.00 99,490.19 N/A 5.700%
Certificate of Deposit Commerical Pacific Bank 12/16/97 6/18/99 99,000.00 99,285.17 N/A 6.100%
Certificate of Deposit First Bank of Beverly Hills 7/1/98 7/1/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.920%
Certificate of Deposit International City Bank 7/16/98 7/16/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.970%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of Mann 7/16/98 7/16/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.900%
Certificate of Deposit South Bay Bank 3/18/98 7/26/99 92,637.95 92,637.95 N/A 5.860%
Certificate of Deposit Life Savings Bank 8/3/98 7/30/99 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.805%
Certificate of Deposit Signal Bank 11/2/98 8/9/99 96,619.58 96,619.58 N/A 6.460%
Certificate of Deposit First NB of Keystone 9/28/98 9/23/99 94,810.00 94,810.00 N/A 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit Advanta National Bank 9/29/98 9/29/99 100,000.00 100,000.00 N/A 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit TPEA No. 5 Credit Union 10/2/98 10/2/99 94,652.15 94,652.15 N/A 5.650%
Certificate of Deposit Johnson Bank 3/17/99 3/17/00 95,000.00 95,000.00 N/A 6.250%
Certificate of Deposit Home Savings of America 9/25/98 3/25/00 75,433.08 75,433.08 N/A 6.510%
Certificate of Deposit Washington Fs & La 9/29/98 4/3/00 100,000.00 100,000.00 N/A 5.840%
Certificate of Deposit Grand Bank, N.A. 5/17/99 5/16/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.530%
Certificate of Deposit Old Florida Bank 6/3/99 6/2/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.700%
Certificate of Deposit Peoples Bank of Kentucky 6/4/99 6/5/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A . 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Habersham Bank 6/10/99 6/9/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Security State Bk of Wanamingo 6/10/99 6/9/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Golden Security Thrift & Loan Bank 7/28/98 7/28/00 90,000.00 90,000.00 90,000.00 5.980%
Certificate of Deposit Nazarene Credit Union 9/25/98 9/25/00 92,155.52 92,155.52 92,155.52 5.680%
Page 6 of 9
TYP
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RAIL
Certificate of Deposit Capital One FSB 9/29/98 9/29/00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.790%
Certificate of Deposit Cedar Rapids ECU 10/1/98 10/1/00 89,576.91 89,576.91 89,576.91 5.810%
Certificate of Deposit Metropolitan FSB 9/29/98 10/2/00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.900%
Certificate of Deposit Erie State Bank 5/14/99 11/14/00 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Cross Country Bank 4/2/99 4/2/01 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.580%
Certificate of Deposit Key Bank USA 4/5/99 4/5/01 99,000,00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit Eaton Bank 4/29/99 4/30/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit Winston Savings & Loans, Ohio 5/7/99 5/7/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit Ashburn Bank 5/11/99 5/11/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%,
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of Jackson 5/20/99 5/21/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.800%
Certificate of Deposit Merrick Banking Corporation 6/21/99 6/21/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit The Park Avenue Bank, N.A. 6/24/99 6/25/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.050%
Certificate of Deposit Corn Belt B&T Co. 6/28/99 6/28/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.200%
Certificate of Deposit Hometown Bank, NA 11/20/98 10/8/01 85,328.46 85,328.46 85,328.46 5.960%
Certificate of Deposit TeleBank, Arlington, VA 5/6/99 11/5/01 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.660%
Certificate of Deposit First Union Bank 2/23/99 3/23/02 84,801.52 84,801.52 84,801.52 5.820%
Certificate of Deposit Corus Bank 4/16/99 4/16/02 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.450%
Certificate of Deposit First Bank & Trust 4/28/99 4/21/02 85,276.39 85,276.39 85,276.39 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Queens County Savings Bank 4/20/99 4/22/02 99,000,00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.650%
Certificate of Deposit Insouth Bank 4/21/99 4/22/02 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of Elk River 4/22/99 4/22/02 99,000,00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit First Bank of Richmond 4/29/99 4/29/02 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit Argo Federal Savings Bank 4/30/99 4/30/02 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of America 5/6/99 5/6/02 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000,00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Assoc Nat'l Bank of Delaware 5/6/99 5/6/02 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of Lucedale 5/12/99 5/13/02 97,000,00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.500%
Page 7 of 9
TYPE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS BALE
Certificate of Deposit Michigan Heritage Bank 5/13/99 5/13/02 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.700%
Certificate of Deposit FlagstarBank 5/14/99 5/14/02 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit New South Fed Savings Bank 2/23/99 8/12/02 97,154.93 97,154.93 97,154.93 5.300%
Certificate of Deposit Western Bank PR 3/3/99 9/3/02 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.400%
Certificate of Deposit Steel Parts Federal Credit Union 11/6/98 12/3/02 79,823.99 79,823.99 79,823.99 6.200%
Certificate of Deposit MBNA 3/3/99 3/3/03 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.400%
Certificate of Deposit State Bank of India 2/18/99 7/1/03 99,311.66 99,311.66 99,311.66 5.410%
Certificate of Deposit Nations Bank 11/23/98 8/4/03 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit Farmers Bank 10/2/98 10/2/03 75,948.98 75,948.98 75,948.98 6.330%
Certificate of Deposit State Bank of Texas 10/2/98 10/2/03 75,948.98 75,948.98 75,948,98 6.330%
Certificate of Deposit Signet Bank 3/1/99 10/29/03 99,914.75 99,914.75 99,914.75 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Orchard Fed Savings Bank 11/4/98 11/4/03 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Gold Coast Federal Credit Union 11/6/98 11/6/03 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Royal Bank of Pennsylvania 12/1/98 12/2/03 76,325.98 76,325.98 76,325.98 6.200%
Certificate of Deposit Doral FSB 12/10/98 12/10/03 98,384.22 98,384.22 98,384.22 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit IBJ Schroeder Bank & Trust Co 12/23/98 12/23/03 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.550%
Certificate of Deposit Bank & Trust Puerto Rico (NY) 1/28/99 1/27/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.300%
Certificate of Deposit The Comm Bank of Ravenswood 1/28/99 1/28/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.350%
Certificate of Deposit Wilmington Trust Co 3/8/99 2/26/04 76,570.64 76,570.64 76,570.64 6.150%
Certificate of Deposit San Jose National Bank 3/3/99 3/3/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.400%
Certificate of Deposit Independent Bank W. Michigan 3/15/99 3/4/04 95,171.78 95,171.78 95,171.78 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit Truman Bank 3/8/99 3/5/04 76,462.13 76,462.13 76,462.13 6.150%
Certificate of Deposit F.C.C. National Bank 3/10/99 3/10/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.700%
Certificate of Deposit .. Greenwood Trust 3/17/99 3/17/04 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit Standard Federal Bank 3/22/99 3/22/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit Lake Forest Bank & Trust 4/6/99 3/26/04 95,158.90 95,158.90 95,158.90 5.550%
Page 8 of 9
TYPE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
June 1999
AMOUNT CURRENT
MATURED MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE FOR CURRENT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MATURITY PRICE MONTH COST > 12 MONTHS RAZE
Certificate of Deposit Libertyville Bank & Trust 4/6/99 3/26/04 95,158.90 95,158.90 95,158.90 5.550%
Certificate of Deposit Household Bank 4/7/99 4/7/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Fremont Investment & Loans 4/7/99 4/7/04 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit LSI Federal Credit Union 4/22/99 4/21/04 76,491.40 76,491.40 76,491.40 6.140%
Certificate of Deposit Transportation Alliance Bank 5/3/99 5/3/04 76,141.57 76,141.57 76,141.57 6.260%,
Certificate of Deposit Bankers Trust 5/20/99 5/3/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.750%
Certificate of Deposit Merrill Lynch Bank USA 5/27/99 6/1/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit Provident Bank, Baltimore, MD 1/21/99 7/21/04 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit European American Bank 2/4/99 8/4/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Peoples Bank 2/10/99 8/10/04 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500%
Certificate of Deposit Bank of Mt. Vernon 2/26/99 9/14/05 69,971.36 69,971.36 69,971.36 6.550%
Certificate of Deposit Manufacturers & Traders Trust 3/4/99 2/24/06 93,229.72 93,229.72 93,229.72 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit Centura National Bank 3/9/99 9/9/06 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit M&I Marshall & Isley Bank 1/27/99 1/27/09 94,818.55 94,818.55 94,818.55 6.250%
Certificate of Deposit Old NB in Evansville 1/28/99 1/28/09 94,772.00 94,772.00 94,772.00 6.250%
Certificate of Deposit St. Francis Bank, F.S.B. 1/29/99 1/29/09 94,525.00 94,525.00 94,525.00 6.520%
Certificate of Deposit Lasalle Bank National Assoc 2/3/99 4/26/11 49,892.00 49,892.00 49,892.00 8.210%
Certificate of Deposit Lasalle Bank National Assoc 1/25/99 1/25/14 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.650%
Total Certificates of Deposits 8,350,469.00
Local Agency Investment Fund State of California Treasurer N/A N/A
N/A
13,699,081.06 N/A 5.095%
Total Investments 29,784,193.60
Page 9 of 9
FUND
NUMBER
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CONSOLIDATED CASH REPORT
ALL FUNDS
JUNE 30, 1999
FUND TITLE
ENDING
BALANCE
001 GENERAL FUND 2,879,201.44
102 TECHNOLOGY FUND 1,247,991.18
103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 1,330,943.07
106 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN 2,123.38
108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 37,116.04
109 GAS TAXES FUND 1,467,787.62
112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND 37,951.02
115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 15,141.91
120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 66,244.88
123 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY FUND 334.94
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 10,973,318.71
126 FIRE DEPT ACTIVITIES FUND 248.11
130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 135,021.35
131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 81,750.50
136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 9,846.68
145 JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND 6,977.44
147 JUDGE PROGRAM 15,092.28
154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 63,395.69
157 SUPPL. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) 174,104.26
158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 17,373.90
159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE 108,984.55
171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT 13,712.59
172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 287,696.80
173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT 20,214.95
174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTR. 71,081.55
176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME 13,158.78
177 RESTITUTION REIMBURSEMENTS 123.18
178 POLICE HAT BADGES 36.11
179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND 1,715.80
181 LSTA LIBRARY SYMPOSIUM 59,665.30
183 LITERACY INITIATIVES VI 10,325.01
189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 416,804.76
190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND 505,101.72
194 LITERACY INITIATIVES VII 68,786.51
195 LANDSCAPE RESERVE 500,000.00
196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 600,000.00
197 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT RESERVE 50,000.00
198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE 17,952.22
199 SOUTHBAY COMMUNITY SERVICES GRANT 20,012.00
200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND-1304 739,638.30
307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND 1,841,814.46
312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY 419,118.54
343 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP 35,015.92
552 TDA 1,392.61
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 3,220,173.59
629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE 45,461.57
630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 394,507.85
631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 44,997.03
643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 965,594.98
718 TRUST & AGENCY 156,106.31
719 1911 ACT IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1,424.52
721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 46,613.37
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
29,239,195.28
MONTHLY STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS
FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE
FUND
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
102 TECHNOLOGY FUND
103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
104 LIBRARY FUND
105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND
106 GRANT -CA LITERACY CAMPAIGN
108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY
109 GAS TAXES FUND
111 P.O.S.T. FUND
112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND
115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND
123 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY FUND
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND
130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND
131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK
136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND
145 JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND
147 JUDGE PROGRAM
153 COPS UNIVERSAL HIRING GRANT
154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND
157 SUPPL. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF)
158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND
159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE
167 GRANT -NC SUPPR OF DRUG ABUSE
169 LOCAL LAW ENFORCE BLOCK GRANT
171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT
172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND
173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT
174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTR.
176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME
177 RESTITUTION REIMBURSEMENTS
178 POLICE HAT BADGES
179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND
181 LTSA LITERACY SYMPOSIUM
182 COPS GRANT PART II
183 LITERACY INITIATIVES VI
184 LIBRARY COMPUTER CENTER
188 GRANT-HIDTA
189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING
190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND
191 GRANT -STOP PROJECT
194 LITERACY INITIATIVES VII
195 LANDSCAPE RESERVE
196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE
197 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT RESERVE
198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE
199 SOUTHBAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT
200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND-1304
301 C.D.B.G.
302 CDC PAYMENTS
307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND
308 HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB. FUND
312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY
313 GRANT-CMAQ
343 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP
347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT
552 TDA
626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND
628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND
629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE
630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION
631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING
632 INFORMATION SERVICES
643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND
718 TRUST & AGENCY
721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
JUNE
2,584,429.33
0.00
0.00
23,239.75
27,080.21
0.00
9,447.07
211,579.49
0.00
31,617.50
5,453.00
9,222.51
0.00
332,768.09
0.00
1,206.01
0.00
0.00
1,900.00
15,861.00
0.00
(800.00)
0.00
12,298.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,363.37
12,464.00
0.00
572.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7,375.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
20,012.00
0.00
0.00
22,484.31
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
88,073.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10,528.92
0.00
3,430,176.41
YTD.JUN
19,671,485.85
900,443.94
240,000.00
424,331.58
485,296.21
30,296.00
51,779.80
1,128,917.57
55,292.32
189,870.92
8,129.00
51,789.58
17,470.00
4,045,711.88
30,499.52
29,047.13
(36,652.84)
4,680.00
1,900.00
67,768.30
41,559.74
66,630.96
123,066.56
36,381.29
375.00
40,835.00
(82.96)
16,676.00
42,883.39
24,928.00
87,248.00
13,158.78
123.18
36.11
4,116.71
63,962.00
102,666.72
4,700.00
35,805.00
15,061.00
500,000.00
522,507.13
25,750.00
205,975.00
500,000.00
600,000.00
50,000.00
19,923.32
206,700.00
787,728.88
330,767.21
257,243.86
747,814.36
2,372,493.55
7,387.32
45,108.00
5,228.36
7,387.00
2,037,688.40
918,563.25
1,307,292.32
134,902.28
50,000.00
400,000.00
50,000.00
276,655.82
1,392,291.55
98,651.14
761.76
41,977,007.75
MONTHLY STATEMENT OF DISBURSEMENTS
FOR THE MONTH OF JUNE
FUND FUND TITLE JUNE YTD.JUN
001 GENERAL FUND
102 TECHNOLOGY FUND
103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
104 LIBRARY FUND
105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND
106 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN
107 RETIREMENT FUND
108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY
109 GAS TAXES FUND
111 P.O.S.T. FUND
112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND
115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND
123 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY FUND
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND
130 EMT•D REVOLVING FUND
131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK
136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND
145 JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND
147 JUDGE PROGRAM
153 COPS UNIVERSAL HIRING GRANT
154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND
157 SUPPL. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF)
158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND
159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE
167 NC SUPPRESSION OF DRUG ABUSE
169 LOCAL LAW ENFORCE BLOCK GRANT
171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT
172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND
173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT
174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT
179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND
180 FFY97 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT
181 LSTA LIBRARY SYMPOSIUM
182 COPS GRANT PART II
183 LITERACY INITIATIVE VI
184 LIBRARY COMPUTER CENTER
188 GRANT•HIDTA
189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING
190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND-1303
191 GRANT -STOP PROJECT
192 LEASE ESCROW FUND
193 COPS GRANT PART III
194 LITERACY INITIATIVES VII
198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE
199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT
200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND•1304
202 FFY98 COPS MORE
301 C.D.B.G.
302 CDC PAYMENTS
307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND
308 HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB. FUND
312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY
313 CMAQ GRANT
314 OTS GRANT
343 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP
347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT
552 TDA
626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND
628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND
629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE
630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION
631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING
632 INFORMATION SERVICES
643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND
718 TRUST & AGENCY
721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND
1,734,240.68 20,093,972.23
50, 528.69 1, 021, 354.07
41,511.00 83,226.40
58,042.88 718,617.47
51,439.72 639,504.23
20,867.29 32,374.72
37,334.90 29,840.80
1,362.65 52,884.99
708,118.03 1,546,914.54
3,876.94 60,900.02
12,498.45 131,126.26
0.00 9,958.26
1,644.24 2,188.94
4,606.52 17,213.46
752,452.02 3,622,040.34
828.53 3,292.23
1,000.00 24,000.43
3,491.34 9,980.83
389.32 3,039.64
2,947.81 2,947.81
5,960.26 53,306.12
4,181.52 79,524.62
(3,368.95) 41,364.32
16,452.63 68,812.05
0.00 20,327.39
3,756.00 5,778.31
7,083.08 94,82$.39
0.00 16,019.06
7,493.44 12,490.15
8,901.99 69,870.61
2,832.22 4,985.91
9,310.36 16,882.93
258.58 8,356.04
0.00 146,871.00
6,595.58 8,636.72
11,480.69 111,748.70
0.00 30,649.31
7,232.90 77,301.01
33,547.41 59,554.64
6,215.20 87,940.19
3,448.22 18,712.84
25,630.01 102,787.54
4,066.47 234,663.09
2,696.62 2,696.62
23,784.51 137,259.48
0.00 1,971.10
35,166.00 206,700.00
0.00 48,090.58
0.00 124,371.00
81,711.13 731,289.13
37,251.66 416,715.61
112,663.66 495,248.11
0.00 2,050,793.80
2,705.00 140,925.50
2,648.02 19,292.34
3,960.00 29,500.25
168.09 286,168.09
0.00 8,850.31
207,769.95 1,885,618.50
205,766.02 1,475,998.88
112,685.32 2,645,760.93
32,526.72 193,634.67
165.47 4,622.20
2,344.54 7,836.69
3,358.58 5,995.73
52,721.25 462,074.97
212,804.51 1,417,414.35
20,681.85 155,114.98
0.00 84.31
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 4,801,837.52 42,430,816.74
City of National City
Pooled Investment Transactions Report
For the Month of June 1999
Date Description Institution Ref. No. Amount
2 Withdrawal LAIF — 1685 (200,000.00)
10 Withdrawal LAIF 30921 (500,000.00)
18 Withdrawal LAIF 18698 (800,000.00)
23 Withdrawal LAIF 9560 (300,000.00)
24 Withdrawal LAIF 8333 (200,000.00)
28 Deposit LAIF 23398 900,000.00
0699_2revised.xls
Page 1 8/20/99
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
9
MEETING DATE September 7, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE STREET TREE COMMITTEE MINUTES
PREPARED BY JIM RUIZ
EXPLANATION.
DEPARTMENT PARKS AND RECREATION
Removal Requests:
3043 Cagle St.
Requests removal because of damage to sidewalk. Committee recommends removal with no
replacement, however committee recommends homeowner pay for removal and for a replace-
ment to be planted in homeowner yard or in a city park. Public Works to be notified
of sidewalk damage.
1419 Coolidge Avenue
Requests removal of a Ficus tree because of sidewalk damage. Committee recommends
removal with replacement. Public Works to be notified of sidewalk damage.
Environmental Review x N/A
Financial Statement
Replacement funds in account 105-442-000-331.
9y) Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve minutes
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Approve minutes.
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
Minutes
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
City of National City
Parks & Recreation Department
140 East Twelfth Street, Suite A, National City, CA 91950-3312
(619) 336-4290
MINUTES OF THE STREET TREE COMMITTEE MEETING OF AUGUST 19, 1999
Called to order at 2 pm
Present: Cesena, Keen, and Schwitkis. Staff: Diaz
Removal requests:
Mrs. Chavez
3043 Cagle Street.
Requests removal because of damage to sidewalk. Committee recommends removal
with no replacement. However, committee recommends homeowner pay for removal
and for a replacement tree to be planted in homeowner yard or in a city park.
Public Works to be notified about sidewalk damage.
William Gerrish
1419 Coolidge Avenue
Requests removal of a Ficus tree because of sidewalk damage. Committee recommends
removal with replacement. Public works to be notified about sidewalk damage.
Adjourned at 2:20 pm.
® Recycled Paper
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE September 7, 1999
10
AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Gloria Norvell
PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla `tJ DEPARTMENT City Clerk
EXPLANATION.
The claim of Gloria Norvell arises from an occurrence on July 7, 1999
and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on July 13, 1999
Environmental Review 3QC N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No.
IMF RECO ENDATION
Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
TT = . CHMENTS (listed Below) Resolution No.
Copy of Claim for Damages
A-200 (Rey. 9/80)
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE 09/07/99 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11
% ITEM TITLE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH DON ILER, MA, FOR
A SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS OF THE HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION.
Walter Amedee, Mgmt. Analys
DEPARTMENT Fire
A CDBG Project, with funding of $50,000, was approved for Fiscal Year 1999/00, entitled "New Fire Station".
The purpose of this CDBG Project is to study Fire Department space needs, investigate HUD Section 108 loan
requirements, and related tasks associated with the preliminary stages of analyzing the replacement of the
headquarters fire station. Phase One of the Fire Station Project includes the completion of a "Fire Department
Space Needs Analysis". The results of the completed Analysis will be presented to the City Council along with
recommendations related to the next step of the process. Staff will seek further direction from the City Council
at that time.
Staff is recommending approval of an agreement with Don Iler, AIA, for the completion of a "Fire Department
Space Needs Analysis". This Agreement is structured to allow for additional analysis including site
assessment and cost estimates as may be approved and directed by the City Council. Mr. Iler has been the
prime architect for more than 35 fire facility projects located throughout California, Nevada, Washington, and
Montana. He is currently specializing in pre -design, conceptual design, and consulting services for fire service
facilities.
For information and discussion purposes, a proposed overall "Project Timeline" is outlined in an attachment
entitled "Fire Department Facility Planning".
Environmental Review N / A
Financial Statement
Agreement not to exceed $15,000. Funding approved in the Fiscal Year 1999/00 CDBG Program Project: "New
Fire Station" as per City of National City City Council meeting minutes dated May 4, 1999. 3 01- 4 0 9 -5 0 0 -5 9 8 - 15 6 E
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign an agreement for c ulting services with Doner, AIA.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
Randy, ? mble, Fire Chief
TCHMENTS (Listed Below)
99-135
Resolution No.
1. "Fire Department Facility Planning".
2. Agreement for consulting services: "Fire Department Space Needs Analysis".
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
RESOLUTION NO. 99- 135
RESOLUTION OF '1'HL CITY COUNCIL OF 1'11L
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING 1'HN:
MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH
DON ILER, MA, FOR A SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
AND SITE REVIEW OF THE HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION
WHEREAS, the City desires to employ an architect to complete a preliminary
space needs analysis and site review for a Fire Station Headquarters facility; and
WHEREAS, the City has determined that Don Iler, Architect, specializes in the
design of Fire Stations and is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired
by the City, and is willing to perform such services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute an agreement with Don Iler, AIA, for a
space needs analysis and site review of the headquarters fire station. Said agreement is on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of September, 1999.
George H. Waters, Mayor
Al _LEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
PLAN-1999
FIRE DEPARTMENT FACILITY PLANNING:
GOAL:
To provide adequate facilities
to support
the
delivery of fire
and related
emergency services through
2030.
OBJECTIVES:
1.
Provide 24 hour facilities
for two fre companies
and one
supervisor.
2.
Provide administrative
office space for Department
staff
3.
Provide training, support
service and related
spaces.
4.
Consider potential future
operational changes
in design.
FISCAL
YEAR
OBJECTIVE
(HISTORY)
FY 1991-92
Renovation of Hq Fire Station recommended
for CIP
Mid -Range Plan MARCH 5, 1991.
FY 1994-95
NEW HQ FIRE STATION RECOMMENDED
FOR CIP Mid
-Range
Plan MARCH 13, 1995.
FY 1997-98
Fire Dept. Strategic Plan Confirms
need for expanded
Headquarters Fire Station with construction
beginning 2001
FY 1998-99
Complete preliminary Space Needs Analysis (1/15/99)
Final Space Needs Analysis Study Budgeted FY 1999-00 (4/99)
FY 1999-00
(PROJECT START)
1. Complete space needs analysis study (11/1/99)
2. Report on study and seek confirmation of Project
and Project site with City Council (11/9/99)
3. Preliminary site reviews completed (1/15/00)
4. Preliminary cost estimate identified (2/15/00)
5. Section 108 funding plan completed (3/15/00)
6. Funding Plan, Basic Design Plan & Cost Estimate
presented to City Council for approval (4/1/00)
FY 2000-01
1. Select architect
(9/1/00);
City
Council Approval
2. Complete
design
plans (3/1/01)
3. Present
design to
City Council
for approval
(4/1/01)
FY 2001-02
1. City Council
approval
- Project
Bid, Contract
Award,
Loan Amount
Confirmed,
construction
begins (11-1-01)
2. Construction
period:
(11/1/01-11/1/02)
FY 2002-03
Construction Completed/Facility Operational (12/1/02).
I:1Commonlhq-sta\Plan\PLAN-1999
Page 1
AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AND
DON ILER, ARCHITECT
FOR CONSULTING SERVICES - FIRE STATION SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 1st day of August, 1999 by and
between the CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, a municipal corporation (the "CITY"), and Don
Iler, Architect (the "ARCHITECT").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the CITY desires to employ the ARCHITECT to complete a
preliminary space needs analysis and site review for a Fire Station Headquarters facility.
WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that the ARCHITECT specializes in the
design of Fire Stations and is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services
desired by the CITY, and the ARCHITECT is willing to perform such services.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. ENGAGEMENT OF ARCHITECT. The CITY hereby agrees to
engage the ARCHITECT and the ARCHITECT hereby agrees to perform the services
hereinafter set forth in accordance with all terms and conditions contained herein.
The ARCHITECT represents that all services required hereunder will be
performed directly by the ARCHITECT or under direct supervision of the ARCHITECT.
2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The ARCHITECT will perform services as
set forth in the attached Exhibit A.
The ARCHITECT shall be responsible for all research and reviews related to
the work and shall not rely on personnel of the CITY for such services, except as authorized in
advance by the CITY. The ARCHITECT shall appear at meetings cited in Exhibit B to keep
staff and City Council advised of the progress on the project and coordinate project activities.
The CITY may unilaterally, or upon request from the ARCHITECT, from time
to time reduce or increase the Scope of Services to be performed by the ARCHITECT under
this Agreement. Upon doing so, the CITY and the ARCHITECT agree to meet in good faith
and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction or increase in the
compensation associated with said change in services, not to exceed a factor of 15% from the
base amount.
3. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION.
Fire Chief hereby is designated as the Project Coordinator for the CITY and will monitor the
progress and execution of this Agreement. The ARCHITECT shall assign a single Project
Director to provide supervision and have overall responsibility for the progress and execution
of this Agreement for the ARCHITECT. Don Iler thereby is designated as the Project
Director for the ARCHITECT.
4. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT. The compensation for the
ARCHITECT shall be based on monthly billings covering actual work performed. Billings
shall include labor classifications, respective rates, hours worked and also materials, if any.
The total cost for all work described in Exhibit A shall not exceed the schedule given in
Exhibit C (the Base amount). Monthly invoices will be processed for payment and remitted
within thirty (30) days from receipt of invoice, provided that work is accomplished consistent
with Exhibit A as determined by the CITY.
The ARCHTIbCT shall maintain all books, documents, papers, employee time
sheets, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and shall make such
materials available at its office at all reasonable times during the term of this Agreement and
for three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement, for inspection by the
CITY and for furnishing of copies to the CITY, if requested.
5. LENGTH OF AGREEMENT. Completion dates or time durations for
specific portions of the Project are set forth in Exhibit D.
6. DISPOSITION AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. The
Memoranda, Reports, Maps, Drawings, Plans, Specifications and other documents prepared
by the ARCHITECT for this Project, whether paper or electronic, shall become the property
of the CITY for use with respect to this Project, and shall be turned over to the CITY upon
completion of the Project, or any phase thereof, as contemplated by this Agreement.
Contemporaneously with the transfer of documents, the ARCHITECT assigns to
the CITY and thereby expressly waives and disclaims, any copyright in, and the right to
reproduce, all written material, drawings, plans, specifications or other work prepared under
this agreement, except upon the CITY's prior authorization regarding reproduction, which
authorization shall not be unreasonably withheld. The ARCHITECT shall, upon request of the
CITY, execute any further document(s) necessary to further effectuate this waiver and
disclaimer. The ARCHITECT may retain one (1) copy of all documents for his/her records.
The ARCHITECT agrees that the CITY may use, reuse, alter, reproduce,
modify, assign, transfer, or in any other way, medium or method utilize the ARCHITECT'S
written work product for the CITY's purposes, and the ARCHITECT expressly waives and
disclaims any residual rights granted to it by Civil Code Sections 980 through 989 relating to
intellectual property and artistic works.
Page 2
Any modification or reuse by the CITY of documents, drawings or
specifications prepared by the ARCHITECT shall relieve the ARCHITECT from liability
under Section 14 but only with respect to the effect of the modification or reuse by the CITY,
or for any liability to the CITY should the documents be used by the CITY for some project
other than what was expressly agreed upon within the Scope of this project, unless otherwise
mutually agreed.
7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties hereto in the
performance of this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents,
employees, partners or joint venturers with one another. The ARCHITECT is not an
employee of the CITY and is not entitled to any of the rights, benefits, or privileges of the
CITY's employees, including but not limited to medical, unemployment, or workers'
compensation insurance.
This Agreement contemplates the personal services of the ARCHITECT and the
ARCHITECT's employees, and it is recognized by the parties that a substantial inducement to
the CITY for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and
competence of the ARCHITECT and its employees. Neither this Agreement nor any interest
herein may be assigned by the ARCHITECT without the prior written consent of the CITY.
Nothing herein contained is intended to prevent the ARCHITECT from employing or hiring as
many employees as the ARCHITECT may deem necessary for the proper and efficient
performance of this Agreement.
8. CONTROL. Neither the CITY nor its officers, agents or employees
shall have any control over the conduct of the ARCHITECT or any of the ARCHITECT'S
employees except as herein set forth, and the ARCHITECT expressly agrees not to represent
that the ARCHITECT or the ARCHITECT's agents, servants, or employees are in any manner
agents, servants or employees of the CITY, it being understood that the ARCHITECT, its
agents, servants, and employees are as to the CITY wholly independent CONTRACTORs and
that the ARCHITECT's obligations to the CITY are solely such as are prescribed by this
Agreement.
9. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW. The ARCHITECT, in
the performance of the services to be provided herein, shall comply with all applicable State
and Federal statutes and regulations, and all applicable ordinances, rules and regulations of the
City of National City now in force. The ARCHITECT, and its subARCHITECTs, shall
obtain and maintain a current City of National City business license prior to and during
performance of any work within the City.
10. LICENSES. PERMITS. ETC. The ARCHITECT represents and
covenants that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that
are legally required to practice its profession. The ARCHITECT represents and covenants that
the ARCHITECT shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term
Page 3
of this Agreement, any license, permit, or approval which is legally required for the
ARCHITECT to practice its profession.
11. STANDARD OF CARE.
A. The ARCHITECT, in performing any services under this Agreement,
shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by
members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar
locations. The CITY expects that the ARCHITECT shall take all special precautions necessary
to protect the ARCHITECT'S employees and members of the public from risk of harm arising
out of the nature of the work and/or the conditions of the work site.
B. The ARCHITECT warrants to the CITY that it is not now, nor has it
been for the five (5) years preceding, involved in arbitration or litigation concerning the
ARCHITECT's professional performance or the furnishing of materials or services relating
thereto.
C. The ARCHITECT is responsible for identifying any unique products,
treatments, processes or materials whose availability is critical to the success of the project the
ARCHITECT has been retained to perform, within the time requirements of the CITY, or,
when no time is specified, then within a commercially reasonable time. Accordingly, unless
the ARCHITECT has notified the CITY otherwise, the ARCHITECT warrants that all
products, materials, processes or treatments identified in the project documents prepared for
the CITY are reasonably commercially available. Any failure by the ARCHITECT to use due
diligence under this sub -paragraph will render the ARCHITECT liable to the CITY for any
increased costs that result from the CITY's later inability to obtain the specified items or any
reasonable substitute within a price range that allows for project completion in the time frame
specified or, when not specified, then within a commercially reasonable time.
12. NON-DISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS. The ARCHITECT will not
discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, color,
ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or
medical condition. The ARCHITECT will take positive action to insure that applicants are
employed without regard to their age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation,
marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. Such action shall
include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer,
recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of
compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The ARCHITECT agrees
to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any
notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause.
13. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. The CITY may from time to
time communicate to the ARCHITECT certain confidential information to enable the
ARCHITECT to effectively perform the services to be provided herein. The ARCHITECT
shall treat all such information as confidential and shall not disclose any part thereof without
the prior written consent of the CITY. The ARCHITECT shall limit the use and circulation of
such information, even within its own organization, to the extent necessary to perform the
Page 4
services to be provided herein. The foregoing obligation of this Section 13, however, shall not
apply to any part of the information that (i) has been disclosed in publicly available sources of
information; (ii) is, through no fault of the ARCHITECT, hereafter disclosed in publicly
available sources of information; (iii) is already in the possession of the ARCHITECT without
any obligation of confidentiality; or (iv) has been or is hereafter rightfully disclosed to the
ARCHITECT by a third party, but only to the extent that the use or disclosure thereof has
been or is rightfully authorized by that third party.
The ARCHITECT shall not disclose any reports, recommendations, conclusions
or other results of the services or the existence of the subject matter of this Agreement without
the prior written consent of the CITY. In its performance hereunder, the ARCHITECT shall
comply with all legal obligations it may now or hereafter have respecting the information or
other property of any other person, firm or corporation.
ARCHITECT shall be liable to CITY for any damages caused by breach of this
condition, pursuant to the provisions of Section 14.
14. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. The ARCHITECT
agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of National City, its officers,
employees and volunteers, against and from any and all liability, loss, damages to property,
injuries to, or death of any person or persons, and all claims, demands, costs or attorneys'
fees, of any kind or nature, including workers' compensation claims, of or by anyone
whomsoever, in any way to the extent resulting from or arising out of the ARCHI'1'ECT's
negligent performance of this Agreement.
15. WORKERS' COMPENSATION. The ARCHITECT shall comply
with all of the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State
of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Government
Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or Federal acts or laws applicable; and
shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY and its officers, employees and volunteers
from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of
every nature and description, including attorney's fees and costs presented, brought or
recovered against the CITY or its officers, employees, or volunteers, for or on account of any
liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by reason of any work to be performed
by the ARCHITECT under this Agreement.
16. INSURANCE. The ARCHITECT, at its sole cost and expense, shall
purchase and maintain throughout the term of this agreement, the following insurance policies:
A. Professional liability insurance with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per
B. Automobile insurance covering all bodily injury and property damage
incurred during the performance of this Agreement, with a minimum coverage of, $1,000,000
combined single limit per accident. Such automobile insurance shall include non -owned
vehicles.
claim.
Page 5
C. Comprehensive general liability insurance, with minimum limits of
$1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence, covering all bodily injury and property
damage arising out of its operation under this Agreement.
D. Workers' compensation insurance covering all of its employees and
volunteers.
E. The aforesaid policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the CITY,
its officers, employees, and volunteers, so that any other policies held by the CITY shall not
contribute to any loss under said insurance. Said policies shall provide for thirty (30) days
prior written notice to the CITY of cancellation, except for non-payment of premium, ten (10)
days prior written notice.
F. Said policies, except for the professional liability and worker's
compensation policies, shall name the CITY and its officers, agents and employees as
additional insureds.
G. If required insurance coverage is provided on a "claims made" rather
than "occurrence" form, the ARCHITECT shall maintain such insurance coverage for three
years after expiration of the term (and any extensions) of this Agreement.
H. Any aggregate insurance limits must apply solely to this Agreement,
except for Professional Liability Insurance.
I. Insurance shall be written with only California admitted companies
which hold a current policy holder's alphabetic and financial size category rating of not less
than A VIII according to the current Best's Key Rating Guide, or a company equal financial
stability that is approved by the City's Risk Manager.
J. This Agreement shall not take effect until certificate(s) or other sufficient
proof that these insurance provisions have been complied with, are filed with and approved by
the CITY's Risk Manager. If the ARCHITECT does not keep all of such insurance policies in
full force and effect at all times during the terms of this Agreement, the CITY may elect to
treat the failure to maintain the requisite insurance as a breach of this Agreement and terminate
the Agreement as provided herein.
17. LEGAL FEES. If any party brings a suit or action against the other
party arising from any breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any inaccuracies in any
of the representations and warranties on the part of the other party arising out of this
Agreement, then in that event, the prevailing party in such action or dispute, whether by final
judgment or out -of -court settlement, shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other
party all costs and expenses of suit, including attorneys' fees.
For purposes of determining who is to be considered the prevailing party, it is
stipulated that attorney's fees incurred in the prosecution or defense of the action or suit shall
not be considered in determining the amount of the judgement or award. Attorney's fees to
the prevailing party if other than the CITY shall, in addition, be limited to the amount of
attorney's fees incurred by the CITY in its prosecution or defense of the action, irrespective of
the actual amount of attorney's fees incurred by the prevailing party.
Page 6
18. MEDIATION/ARBITRATION. If a dispute arises out of or relates to
this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the parties agree first to try, in good faith, to settle the
dispute by mediation in San Diego, California, in accordance with the Commercial Mediation
Rules of the American Arbitration Association (the "AAA") before resorting to arbitration.
The costs of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties. Any controversy or claim arising
out of, or relating to, this Agreement, or breach thereof, which is not resolved by mediation
may be settled by arbitration in San Diego, California, in accordance with the Commercial
Arbitration Rules of the AAA then existing if mutually agreed to by the parties. Any award
rendered shall be final and conclusive upon the parties, and a judgment thereon may be entered
in any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy. The expenses of
the arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties to the arbitration, provided that each party
shall pay for and bear the costs of its own experts, evidence and attorneys' fees, except that the
arbitrator may assess such expenses or any part thereof against a specified party as part of the
arbitration award.
19. TERMINATION. A. This Agreement may be terminated with or
without cause by the CITY. Termination without cause shall be effective only upon 30-day
written notice to the ARCHITECT. During said 30-day period the ARCHITECT shall
perform all services in accordance with this Agreement.
B. This Agreement may also be terminated immediately by the CITY for
cause in the event of a material breach of this Agreement, misrepresentation by the
ARCHITECT in connection with the formation of this Agreement or the performance of
services, or the failure to perform services as directed by the CITY.
C. Termination with or without cause shall be effected by delivery of
written Notice of Termination to the ARCHITECT as provided for herein.
D. In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished Memoranda
Reports, Maps, Drawings, Plans, Specifications and other documents prepared by the
ARCHITECT, whether paper or electronic, shall immediately become the property of and be
delivered to the CITY, and the ARCHITECT shall be entitled to receive just and equitable
compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up
to the effective date of the Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable
hereunder, and less any damages caused the CITY by the ARCHITECT's breach, if any.
Thereafter, ownership of said written material shall vest in the CITY all rights set forth in
Section 6.
E. The CITY further reserves the right to immediately terminate this
Agreement upon: (1) the filing of a petition in bankruptcy affecting the ARCHITECT; (2) a
reorganization of the ARCHITECT for the benefit of creditors; or (3) a business
reorganization, change in business name or change in business status of the ARCHITECT.
20. NOTICES. All notices or other communications required or permitted
hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered; or sent by overnight mail
(Federal Express or the like); or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return
receipt requested; or sent by ordinary mail, postage prepaid; or telegraphed or cabled; or
delivered or sent by telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax; and shall be deemed received upon the
Page 7
earlier of (i) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive
such notice, (ii) if sent by overnight mail, the business day following its deposit in such
overnight mail facility, (iii) if mailed by registered, certified or ordinary mail, five (5) days
(ten (10) days if the address is outside the State of California) after the date of deposit in a post
office, mailbox, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States
Postal Service, (iv) if given by telegraph or cable, when delivered to the telegraph company
with charges prepaid, or (v) if given by telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax, when sent. Any
notice, request, demand, direction or other communication delivered or sent as specified above
shall be directed to the following persons:
To the CITY:
City of National City Fire Department
Attention: Randy Kimble, Fire Chief
333 E 16th Street
National City, CA 91950
To the ARCHITECT: Don Iler-Architect
13 Bridington
Laguna Niguel, CA 92677
Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner
specified in this Section. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because
of changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the
notice, demand, request or communication sent. Any notice, request, demand, direction or
other communication sent by cable, telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax must be confirmed within
forty-eight (48) hours by letter mailed or delivered as specified in this Section.
21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND POLITICAL REFORM ACT
OBLIGATIONS. During the term of this Agreement, the ARCHITECT shall not perform
services of any kind for any person or entity whose interests conflict in any way with those of
the City of National City. The ARCHITECT also agrees not to specify any product,
treatment, process or material for the project in which the ARCHITECT has a material
financial interest, either direct or indirect, without first notifying the CITY of that fact. The
ARCHITECT shall at all times comply with the terms of the Political Reform Act and the
National City Conflict of Interest Code. The ARCHITECT shall immediately disqualify itself
and shall not use its official position to influence in any way any matter coming before the
CITY in which the ARCHITECT has a financial interest as defined in Government Code
Section 87103. The ARCHITECT represents that it has no knowledge of any financial
interests that would require it to disqualify itself from any matter on which it might perform
services for the CITY.
If checked, the ARCHITECT shall comply with all of the reporting
requirements of the Political Reform Act and the National City Conflict of Interest Code.
Specifically, the ARCHITECT shall file a Statement of Economic Interests with the City Clerk
Page 8
of the City of National City in a timely manner on forms which the ARCHITECT shall obtain
from the City Clerk.
The ARCHITECT shall be strictly liable to the CITY for all damages, costs or
expenses the CITY may suffer by virtue of any violation of this Paragraph 21 by the
ARCHITECT.
22. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS.
A. Computation of Time Periods. If any date or time period provided for in
this Agreement is or ends on a Saturday, Sunday or federal, state or legal holiday, then such
date shall automatically be extended until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time of the next day which is not
a Saturday, Sunday or federal, state or legal holiday.
B. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall
constitute but one and the same instrument.
C. Captions. Any captions to, or headings of, the sections or subsections of
this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties hereto, are not a part of this
Agreement, and shall not be used for the interpretation or determination of the validity of this
Agreement or any provision hereof.
D. No Obligations to Third Parties. Except as otherwise expressly provided
herein, the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights
upon, or obligate any of the parties hereto, to any person or entity other than the parties
hereto.
E. Exhibits and Schedules. The Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto are
hereby incorporated herein by this reference for all purposes.
F. Amendment to this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement may not be
modified or amended except by an instrument in writing executed by each of the parties
hereto.
G. Waiver. The waiver or failure to enforce any provision of this
Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any future breach of any such provision or any
other provision hereof.
H. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California.
I. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreements,
negotiations and communications, oral or written, and contains the entire agreement between
the parties as to the subject matter hereof. No subsequent agreement, representation, or
promise made by either party hereto, or by or to an employee, officer, agent or representative
of any party hereto shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be
bound thereby.
J. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall
inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
K. Construction. The parties acknowledge and agree that (i) each party is
of equal bargaining strength, (ii) each party has actively participated in the drafting,
preparation and negotiation of this Agreement, (iii) each such party has consulted with or has
Page 9
had the opportunity to consult with its own, independent counsel and such other professional
advisors as such party has deemed appropriate, relative to any and all matters contemplated
under this Agreement, (iv) each party and such party's counsel and advisors have reviewed this
Agreement, (v) each party has agreed to enter into this Agreement following such review and
the rendering of such advice, and (vi) any rule or construction to the effect that ambiguities are
to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement,
or any portions hereof, or any amendments hereto.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on
the date and year first above written.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ARCHITECT
By: By:
George Waters, Mayor Don Iler, Architect
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
Page 10
Exhibit A
SCOPE OF WORK
PHASE I — SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
TASK 1.1 VISIT THE FIRES STATION "OVERNIGHT"
Consultant will spend a night with the shift firefighters at the City of National City
Headquarters Fire Station.
TASK 1.2 HOLD INITIAL PROJECT KICKOFF MEETING
Consultant will meet with the Fire Department Project Committee to commence the
Fire Station Headquarters Study. Items to discuss will include schedule, budget, space
needs and adjacencies and potential sites.
Also discussion of broad design concepts, initial concerns and comments will be
encouraged at this meeting.
TASK 1.3 GENERATE PRELIMINARY SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
Consultant will generate a preliminary space needs analysis listing required spaces with
their associated size and square footage, allocated square footage for circulation and
structure, and a total size for the Fire Station. The facility will include areas for a 24-
hour facility for two fire companies and one supervisor; administrative offices for
department administrative staff, training and support services and related spaces.
TASK 1.4 HOLD SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS PROGRESS MEETING
Consultant will meet with the Fire Department Project Committee to review
information gathered to date and rough draft space needs analysis. Based on this
meeting, the Space Needs Analysis will be finalized.
PHASE II — SITE EVALUATION/BUDGETARY ESTIMATES
TASK 2.1 PROJECT SITE VISIT
Consultant will visit the one (1) or two (2) potential project sites to gain first hand
knowledge of the area, site features, views, etc.
Page 11
TASK 2.2 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY MEETINGS
Consultant will meet with City of National City Building, Engineering and Planning
Departments to obtain necessary information to generate preliminary concept site plans
(i.e. setbacks, parking requirements, lot coverage, etc.). The two sites possibly to be
considered are the existing Fire Station site with adjoining properties to immediate west
and site located at 1400 National City Boulevard.
TASK 2.3 CONCEPT SITE PLAN/SITE EVALUATION STUDY
Consultant will generate one (1) 11 x 17 sketch concept site plan for each of the one or
two project sites. Each site plan alternative will show the Fire Station building
footprint, ingress/egress, parking, fuel island (if required), landscape areas and any
other major site features. These site plan(s) will be in a rough sketch format.
Opportunities/constraints (pros/cons) will be generated in text for each concept site
plan. In addition, Consultant will generate a preliminary site evaluation review for
each of the one or two sites including code/planning issues, ingress/egress, utility
availability, etc.
TASK 2.4 HOLD SITE EVALUATION PROGRESS MEETING
Consultant will meet with the Fire Department Project Committee to present rough
draft concept site plan(s) and initial evaluation of sites. Comments/input received will
be incorporated into the final concept site plan exhibits and site evaluation text.
TASK 2.5 PRELIMINARY BUDGETARY COST ESTIMATES
Each of the concept site plan(s) will have a corresponding preliminary "functional
format" cost estimate prepared by a Cost Estimating firm. Each estimate will evaluate
construction costs associated with each site plan including site and building costs. The
estimates will be broad in nature (not detailed) to provide initial budgetary construction
costs. Estimates will not include site acquisition cost, furniture, fixtures, and
equipment (FF&E), City management / inspection / testing costs, etc.
TASK 2.6 HOLD FINAL SITE EVALUATION/BUDGETARY ESTIMATE
REVIEW/APPROVAL MEETING
Consultant will meet with the Fire Department Project Committee to present the final
Site Evaluation/Budgetary Estimate exhibits and findings.
TASK 2.7 CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION
Consultant will present the study report and exhibits to the City Council for their
review/approval.
Page 12
Exhibit B
MEETING SCHEDULE
1. Fire Department Fire Station Committee
2. Report on study and confirm sites with City Council. (2°d QTR FY 1999-00)
Page 13
Exhibit C
FEE SCHEDULE
PHASE I
Architectural A fixed fee of $3.390.00
TOTAL PHASE I FEE $3,390.00
PHASE II
Architectural A fixed fee of $7,750.00
Cost Estimation (two (2) estimates total - Task 2.5) A fixed fee of $2.000.00
TOTAL PHASE II FEE $9,750.00
*TOTAL FEE (PHASE I & II) $13,140.00
*Reimbursable Expenses:
Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to compensation for basic services and include expenses
incurred by the Consultant and Consultant's employees and Subconsultants in the interest of
the project identified as follows: Mileage, long distance communications, reproductions,
plotting costs, postage and handling, and deliveries; and will be charged at a multiple of one
point two (1.2) times the direct cost of the expense to an estimated maximum of $1,500.00
without prior written authorization received from the City.
Additional Services:
For additional or hourly services of Consultant requested by the City, (including additional
meetings if requested) not included above, compensation will be billed hourly per the
following schedule:
Don Iler $110.00 per hour
Draftsperson $ 50.00 per hour
Clerical $ 45.00 per hour
For additional services of Subconsultants, a multiple of one and two tenths (1.2) times the
amounts billed to the Consultant will be charged for such services.
Page 14
Exhibit D
PLAN SCHEDULE
Complete space needs analysis study.
(NOV 1, 1999)
Report on study and seek confirmation of (NOV 1999)
Project and Project site with City Council.
Page 15
ITEM #12
WRITTEN C1MJNICATIONS
9/7/99
PARADISE CREEK
EDUCATIONAL PARK
September 1, 1999
Mayor George Waters and City Council,
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, CA 91950
Dear Mayor Waters and City Council members,
Paradise Creek Educational Park Incorporated is pursuing a grant opportunity with the
U.S. EPA to carry out more planning and design for Paradise Creek and surrounding
areas. The grant application requires a non-federal match of 20%. I have talked with
EPA representative Nova Blazej and have been told that the $750,000 granted to the
City can be considered for the match, since it is all going toward the same project. Of
course this means that the match provided is way above the 20% and this shows the
EPA we are serious in this endeavor.
According to the application, the match must be documented with a letter. If you could
provide this letter we will be able to grow our pot of money, with the non-profit
coordinating this future planning and design. I am requesting that you direct Mr. Jim
Ruiz to write this letter for the Application package.
If we are successful, this grant will provide us with answers to the unique problems
and will detail opportunities in the watershed of Paradise Creek.
Thank you,
,ed ,404-44
Ted A. Godshalk
President, PCEPI
• • • (619) 477-.14i .302 W. 18th. St. National City, CA 91950 • •
6.7b4
Legislation
ITEM #13
9/7/99
Subscribe
Bill Info
Past SessionsSB 207 Infrastructure financing districts: border zone.
Codes
Statutes BILL NUMBER: SB 207 AMENDED 07/07/99
Constitution
Cat tnt State ita Senate
Home Senators Legislation Committees Schedules Offices/Caucuses Audio/TV Fac
-Current Session Legislation -
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JULY 7, 1999
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY JUNE 28, 1999
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 19, 1999
AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 25, 1999
INTRODUCED BY Senator Peace
JANUARY 20, 1999
An act to add Chapter 2.9 (commencing with Section 53398) to Part 1 of
Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, relating to infrastructure
financing districts.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 207, as amended, Peace. Infrastructure financing districts: border
zone.
(1) Under existing law, redevelopment agencies are authorized to pay
the principal of, and interest on, indebtedness incurred to finance or
refinance redevelopment, from a portion of property tax revenues
diverted from other taxing agencies. The portion of taxes diverted is the
amount attributable to increases in assessed valuation of property in
the redevelopment project area subsequent to establishment thereof.
This method of financing is commonly known as "tax increment"
financing and is specifically authorized by Section 16 of Article XVI of
the California Constitution.
Existing law also authorizes counties and cities to form infrastructure
financing districts, in accordance with a prescribed procedure, to
finance public capital facilities utilizing a similar method of tax
increment financing.
This bill would similarly authorize counties and cities to create
infrastructure financing districts in the border development zone, as
defined, to finance public works in the Mexican border region.
Because county officers would be responsible for the division of taxes
under the bill, the bill would impose a state -mandated local program in
the case of districts formed by cities, but the bill would require all
http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/testbin/ca-html?GOPHER ROOT2:[BILL.CURRENT.SB.FROM020@2S930207]C
Legislation
infrastructure financing districts to reimburse those county costs.
(2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.
Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims
Fund to pay the costs of mandates that do not exceed $1,000,000
statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed
$1,000,000.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates
determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these
statutory provisions.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State -mandated local program: yes.
CTION 1. Chapter 2.9 (commencing with Section 53398) is added to
1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code, to read:
C R 2.9. INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING DISTRICT
THE B
ER DEVELOPMENT ZONE
Article 1. Ge . al Provisions
53398. (a) The Le: ature finds and declares tha
Free Trade Agreeme as resulted in a dram
with Mexico. In 1998 co ' anies in Califor
billion worth of goods to ., and mo
the state are the direct result . his t
strained the inadequate public
the international border.
orth American
crease in trade
orted over $13.3
an 80,000 jobs throughout
This increased trade has
ucture in the region just north of
(b) The Legislature further s and de es
opportunity for industri . elopment, inc
biotechnology manufac ' s g, in the region a
this region lacks the 'lic infrastructure neces
development or to .vide for the rapid and reliabl
to, and distribut' of products from, companies thro
that there is a significant
ing high technology and
the border. However,
to support new
elivery of supplies
out the state.
(c) The Legis e finds and declares that the state and . ' eral
governmen . ave withdrawn in whole or in part from the ' rmer role
in financ infrastructure facilities, including highways, roa , . nd
interc ' : es, sewage facilities and water reclamation works, w
supp : nd treatment works, flood control and drainage works, sc .is,
lib • es, parks, parking facilities, open space, and seismic retrofit a
r bilitation of public facilities.
) The Legislature further finds and declares that the methods
available to local agencies to finance public works often place an undue
http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/testbin/ca-html?GOPHER ROOT2:[BILL.CURRENT.SB.FROM02902 207]C
San Diego Union -Tribune Archive Document Page 1 of 3
(Page B-3:1,2,7,8; B-6:3 )
Peace considers a consolidation of local agencies
Anthony Millican
STAFF WRITER
20-Aug-1999 Friday
It's been talked about for years.
Now, one of the most powerful legislators in the state is toying with the
idea of trying to consolidate several local agencies. State Sen. Steve
Peace, D-El Cajon, would abolish the San Diego Unified Port District, the
San Diego Association of Governments, the County Water Authority, the
Metropolitan Transit Development Board and the North County Transit
District. He would create one agency that would assume their
responsibilities, which have been delegated to them over the years by the
state Legislature.
Peace is sounding out local officials about the proposal, which is still in
its formative stages. He is debating whether to put into the legislative
hopper before this year's session concludes Sept. 10 -- or even pursue it
at all.
"The advantages are, first of all, you eliminate a whole bunch of upper
management bureaucracies and consolidate them into a smaller, more
streamlined, more focused and, hopefully, better coordinated infrastructure
and transportation operation," Peace said.
The idea comes on the heels of Peace's recent criticism of port Executive
Director Dennis Bouey during a Port Commission meeting about airport
matters.
"It's one thing to talk about; it's another to see how it works," said port
spokeswoman Rita Vandergaw. "We haven't seen anything yet that describes
how it is going to work."
After a voter referendum, the Legislature established the Port District in
1962 to manage the harbor, operate Lindbergh Field and administer
nonmilitary tideland areas on San Diego Bay. An appointed seven -member
board governs the district and oversees coastal property in five "port"
cities: San Diego, Chula Vista, National City, Imperial Beach and Coronado.
Over the years, a number of San Diego legislators have floated bills that
would tinker with the port commission's makeup and responsibilities,
frequently after they were involved in run-ins with the port.
.../idoc. cgi?491748+unix+CityManage+www.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+H/2/99
San Diego Union -Tribune Archive Document Page 2 of 3
Art Madrid, chairman of SANDAG's board, said Peace's idea is worth
studying. SANDAG is a planning agency representing the region's 18 cities
and the county's governments.
"On paper, it makes a lot of sense," said Madrid, mayor of La Mesa. "I
think there is a need to consolidate agencies that have overlapping
jurisdictions. But I think there is a need to have input from the affected
agencies so that there is buy -in from virtually everybody."
Madrid said SANDAG is a "great" planning organization that has been stymied
by its inability to implement its recommendations.
However, Peace's proposal would continue to leave land -use decisions in the
hands of city and county governments.
County Supervisor Greg Cox said the concept is interesting.
"I know it is frustrating sometimes for people to look at the multiplicity
of government layers in San Diego County," Cox said.
But he said he is concerned about the possibility of Peace tagging the idea
onto a bill establishing a border development zone, a three-mile band
across San Diego and Imperial counties, potentially delaying passage of the
bill.
"This is clearly a major shift, a major change," Cox said of consolidating
the agencies. "I think it is something that ought to be pursued in a more
deliberative process."
Ric Grenell, press secretary for San Diego Mayor Susan Golding, said the
mayor didn't know enough about the proposal to take a position yet, but
noted that Golding has long thought a combined city -county form of
government, such as exists in Miami and Dade County in Florida, would be
beneficial.
Much of the rancor between Peace and the port stems from the agency's
approach to airport matters.
Bouey, the port's top administrator, has proposed helping to find a new
airport site while concurrently planning for a second runway at Lindbergh
Field.
As a first step, Bouey suggested construction of a new 10-gate passenger
terminal and 600-space parking lot north of the existing runway, off
Pacific Highway. The primary tenant would be Southwest Airlines. As a
second step, Bouey's plan recommends a multipurpose transit center along
Pacific Highway that wouldn't become operational until 2010.
Peace wants the transit center done quicker than that.
"I can live with having a second runway or not having a second runway,"
Peace had said in an earlier interview. "What I can't live with is the port
avoiding making the fundamental decision to get that multiuse facility
built and getting the traffic off of Harbor (Drive)."
The transit center, he said, would allow use of high-speed rail to connect
.../idoc. cgi?491748+unix+CityManage+www.uniontrib. com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+ 9/2/99
San Diego Union -Tribune Archive Document
Page 3 of 3
Lindbergh with other cities, and possibly Miramar Marine Corps Air Station,
should that become available for civilian use.
"People come to the terminals at Lindbergh, you check your baggage, you get
onto high-speed rail and in 10 minutes you're at Miramar," Peace said.
Copyright Union-Tnbune Publishing Co.
.../idoc.cgi?491748+unix+CityManage+www.uniontrib.com..80+Union-Tribune+Union-Tribune+ 9/2/99
Legislation
ITEM # 14
9/7/99
C tfornj t lusts Senate
Rome Senators Legislation Committees Seheduipq Offices/Callouses Audio/TV Fat
Subscribe Bill Info -Current Session Legislation -
Past Codes Sessions
SB 664 San Diego ferry service: San Diego -Coronado
Bridg
Statutes
Constitution BILL NUMBER: SB 664 AMENDED 09/01/99
AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY SEPTEMBER 1, 1999
AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 19, 1999
AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 1, 1999
AMENDED IN SENATE MAY 28, 1999
AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 27, 1999
INTRODUCED BY Senator Alpert
FEBRUARY 24, 1999
amxcnd Ccctiono An act to amend Section 120265 of, and to add Section
99400.7 to, the Public Utilities Code, and to amend Sections 30796.7
and 30796.10 of the Streets and Highways Code, relating to
transportation, and declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect
immediately.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
SB 664, as amended, Alpert. San Diego ferry service: San
Diego -Coronado Bridge.
(1) The Mills-Alquist-Deddeh Act specifies allowable claims for local
transportation funds that may be filed with the transportation
planning agency.
This bill would allow cities within the County of San Diego to file
claims with the transportation planning agency to provide commuter
ferry service on San Diego Bay for the purpose of serving peak period
commute trips for pedestrians and bicycles, as specified. Because this
would increase the level of services required of transportation planning
agencies, this bill would impose a state -mandated local program.
(2) Existing law creates the San Diego Metropolitan Transit
Development Board in San Diego County. Provision is made, on an
annual basis and at the time of the annual apportionment, for an
assessment of each member jurisdiction based on a percentage of its
apportionment equal to the percentage of its 1983-84 fiscal year
apportionment claimed for support of regional transit services or 5% of
http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/testbin/ca-html?GOPHER ROOT2:[BILL.CURRENT.SB.FROMO6A0 664]C
Legislation
its annual apportionment, whichever is greater.
This bill would require that assessment to each member jurisdiction,
except the County of San Diego, to equal at least 40% and be not more
than 50% of its annual apportionment claimed for support of regional
services, except as specified below.
The bill would delete a requirement in existing law that the specified
assessment formula remain in effect for a minimum of 3 fiscal years,
would delete authority for the formula to be amended after the expiration
of those 3 years, would delete authority for a specified regional transit
advisory service to review the formula and recommend appropriate
changes to the board and the pertinent jurisdictions, and, instead, would
authorize the board to adopt and amend, on an annual basis, an
assessment formula for funding regional services. The bill would require
the board to consider the transit needs and revenue for the next 5-year
period including certain specific factors. The bill would prohibit the
formula from providing for an assessment for any city that is greater
than 50% of that city's annual apportionment for support of regional
services. The bill would require the regional transit service advisory
committee to review, on an annual basis, the assessment formula and
submit to the board any recommended changes to the formula that are
based on the specified factors.
The bill would delete a requirement in existing law for the board to
establish certain reserves at the request of specified cities or the county.
This bill would require the board, for the 1999-2000 fiscal year only, to
proportionately assess each jurisdiction within the board's area, as
described, for the costs of commuter ferry service with the total aggregate
amount assessed not to exceed $120,000.
To the extent that these provisions would increase the level of service
required of the board or the regional transit service advisory committee,
the bill would impose a state -mandated local program.
(3) Existing law requires the revenue from any tolls imposed on the San
Diego -Coronado Bridge to be used first for expenses related to the
collection of tolls and operation of the bridge.
This bill would specify that expenses related to the collection of tolls
includco include , but mare not limited to, the installation and
operation of an automated toll collection system, if that system is
installed by the San Diego Association of Governments. The bill would
make conforming changes.
(3)
(4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local
agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state.
Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/testbin/ca-html?GOPHER ROOT2:[BILL.CURRENT.SB.FROM060 2 664]C
Legislation
reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims
Fund to pay the costs of mandates that do not exceed $1,000,000
statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed
$1,000,000.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates
determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state,
reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these
statutory provisions.
(1)
(5) The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an
urgency statute.
Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State -mandated
local program: yes.
CTION 1. Section 99400.7 is added to the Public Utilities Code
994
San Di
planning
for the purp
and bicycles. T
San Diego Bay, b
plan, shall serve em
and may be provided b
operating under a franchi
organized pursuant to Divisi
Title 1 of the Corporations Co
Notwithstanding Section 99232, cities within the
• may file a claim under this article with the tr ncy to provide commuter ferry service o
of serving peak period commute tri
ommuter ferry service may b
all be consistent with t
ment centers and
tract with o
• r licens
1
SEC. 2. Section 120265 of t
blti
ty of
ortation
Diego Bay
r pedestrians
ted anywhere on
gional transportation
volume activity centers,
tors, private entities
nonprofit corporations
encing with Section 9000) of
•
I
tilities Code is amended to read:
120265. (a) The board s provide a s em of regional transit
operating services a pport activities luding, but not limited to,
facilities, fare me ormation, mainten e, marketing, security,
and signing for ea of jurisdiction, to be • ed from the regional
transit fund w the board shall create. The b. d may provide the
regional se s directly, by contract with the Sa i 'ego Transit
Corporat or by contract with any other provider I ervices as it
deems opriate, and upon terms and conditions tha , e board finds
in its interests. The board shall complete an econom easibility
stu competitive bidding for regional transit service wit 180
da om the date of acquisition of the San Diego Transit Co • ation
shall update the study at any time the board deems approp e to
sider changed circumstances. The board shall adopt a policy fo
�ntract services to permit prices and other factors to be compared a
evaluated prior to negotiating any contract for regional service.
I
http://www.sen.ca.gov/htbin/testbin/ca-html?GOPHER ROOT2:[BILL.CURRENT.SB.FROM060QD�0664]C