HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999 02-16 CC AGENDA PKTAGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING
NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY - FEBRUARY 16, 1999 - 3:00 P.M.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO
THE CITY CLERK
IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR
CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY
MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO
KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY THE CITY MANAGER, TOM G.
MCCABE
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF FEBRUARY 9,
1999.
COUNCIL AGENDA
2/16/99 Page 2
MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
Employee Recognition - Craig Short, Police Captain
PRESENTATIONS
Employee Introduction Program
League of California Cities Video entitled "You're at Home" (10 min.)
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters which are of a routine or
noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a
single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed
from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a
Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public.
1. WARRANT REGISTER #32. (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $498,188.64.
2. Claim for Damages: Oletta Johnson. (City Clerk)
3. Consider joining the Amicus Curiae Brief to be filed on behalf of the City of Los
Angeles in L.A. Alliance for Survival v. City of Los Angeles. (City Attorney)
4. Request to enter antique fire engine in the Maytime Band Review. (Fire)
COUNCIL AGENDA
2/16/99 Page 3
NEW BUSINESS
5. Use of the Community Building by Sweetwater High's Marine Corps Junior
Reserve Officers Training Corps (MCJROTC) for a parent's potluck dinner and
waiver of fees. (Public Works)
6. Notice of Decision - Modification of a Planned Development Permit and a Zone
Variance to convert an apartment complex recreation room into a dwelling unit
without the required number of parking spaces at 924-926 "N" Ave. Case File
Nos.: M1-PD-1974; Z-1998-4. (Planning)
7. Notice of Decision - Conditional Use Permit for a mortuary at 2200 Highland
Avenue (Case File No. CUP-1998-9). (Planning)
-* CITY MANAGER
-* CITY ATTORNEY
—>. OTHER STAFF
- MAYOR
-* CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL AGENDA
2/16/99 Page 4
NEW BUSINESS (Cont.)
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit)
NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back
on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or
urgent nature.
ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular City Council Meeting - February 23, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. - Council
Chambers, Civic Center.
TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO
IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Office of the Mayor
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526
George H. Waters - Mayor
DATE: JANUARY 26, 1999
TO: COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MAYOR GEORGE H. WATERS
SUBJECT: EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
The following City employee will complete twenty-five years of service with the City of
National City on February 24, 1999:
NAME: CRAIG A. SHORT
POSITION: POLICE CAPTAIN
HIRED: FEBRUARY 24, 1974
In honor of his service to our community, Mr. Short will be recognized at the Council
meeting on February 16, 1999.
GEORGE H. WATERS
MAYOR
GHW:nu
cc: CITY MANAGER
CRAIG A. SHORT, POLICE CAPTAIN
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR
Rcc.u;ci P.111cr
City of National City
Personnel Department
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950
Phone: (619) 336-4300
TDD: (619) 336-4304
MEMORANDUM
DATE •February 9, 1999
TO Park Morse, Assistant City Manager
FROM Roger C. DeFratis, Personnel it for
SUBJECT EMPLOYEE INTRODUCTION PROGRAM
The City Council has requested that all new full-time employees hired each month be invited to the third City Council
meeting of each month.
The attendance of the employee is voluntary and will not be paid overtime for such appearance.
The below department director(s) are requested to extend such an invitation to the listed employee(s) and confirm the
employee(s) attendance, if applicable, with the City Manager by the Thursday preceding the meeting.
DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
EIUIPLO
YEEjPOSITION J;
DATE OF HIRE;:
Chief DiCerchio
Christopher Sullivan/Police Officer
Kenneth KufahllPolice Officer
Jason BurkettlPolice Officer
January 19, 1999
January 20, 1999
February 2, 1999
xc: Chief DiCerchio
RCD:Im
YELIOS.DOC1
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE FEBRUARY 16,1999 AGENDA ITEM NO.
1
f' ITEM TITLE
WARRANT REGISTER #32
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
ROBERT RABAGO
EXPLANATION
Ratification of Warrant Register #32
per Government section Code 37208.
FINANCE
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
I recommend ratification theserrants for a total
of $504,664.30 LIrj_)
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
1. Warrant Register #32
2. Worker's Comp Warrant Register dated 02/03/99
A-2:D (Re. viol,
TO:
FROM:
City of National City
Department of Finance
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950-4397
(619) 336-4267
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
MARIA L. MATIENZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF WARRANTS AND/OR PAYROLL
REGISTER NO. 32
GENERAL FUND
TECHNOLOGY FUND
LIBRARY FUND
PARKS MAINTENANCE FUN
RETIREMENT FUND
GAS TAXES FUND
P.O.S.T. FUND
LOWER SWE=TWATER FUND
SEWER SERVICE FUND
STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY
GRANT -NC SUPPE. OF DR
LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRI
GRANT - ___ETA
REGISTER TOTALS
PAYROLL
TOTAL
91,993.89
36,127.99
763.42
1,295.06
1,954.20
64,154.14
98.80
161.03
363.88
12.23
3,376.31
3.74
170.34
24,
CIVIC CENTER REFURBIS
GRANT-C.D.B.G.
CDC PAYMENTS
PROPOSITION "A" FUND
GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE
TDA
FACILITIES MAINT FUND
LIABILITY INS. FUND
GENERAL SERVICES FUND
INFORMATION SYSTEMS M
INFORMATION SERVICES
MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUN
TRUST Sr AGENCY
1,941.69
858.38
648.70
437.31
159,9R8.01
52,786.55
17,280.40
5?9.76
1 841 . 50
2,222.95
1, 48.13
32,532.51
7 -
.00
498,
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS AS LISTED ABOVE AND COVERED BY.
WARRANT NUMBERS 15'527 THROUGH 1; _A TNCLUSIVE•
EXCEPTING NONE 1835-1849 INCLUSIVE
ARE _ ._ _.L= IT AND JUST TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWL._I _- AND. CONFORM TO
THE_TRRENT FISCAL YFAR ..LDTHAT
THE _.__ __ FUNDS TO PAY SA JD SMANDS .
5[ Recycled �'lner
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE February 16, 1999
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
I ITEM TITLE
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Oletta Johnson
PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla
DEPARTMENT City Clerk
EXPLANATION.
The claim of Oletta Johnson arises from an occurrence on December 17, 1998
and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on January 19, 1999
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
XX N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
TTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
Copy of Claim for Damages.
A-200 (Re. Incl
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE Feb. 16, 1999
AGENDA ITEM NO 3
C ITEM TITLE
Consider Joining the Amicus Curiae Brief to be Filed on behalf of the City of Los
Angeles in L.A. Alliance for Survival v. City of Los Angeles
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION.
G. H. Eiser, Ill, City Attorney 1DEPARTMENT
City Attorney
The City of Los Angeles is involved in litigation, now before the California Supreme
Court, in which will be determined the proper standard to be applied for analyzing the
constitutionality of ordinances governing solicitation.
Los Angeles is involved in litigation in which the validity of its "aggressive
solicitation" is being challenged. The opponents of the ordinance claim that they are
protected by free speech rights under the California Constitution, which are broader
than the rights conferred by the U.S. Constitution. The City's position is. that such rights
are covered under the narrower protection of the First Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution.
National City has successfully enforced its outdoor solicitation regulations in the
past. The outcome of this case will possibly impact those regulations.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
There is no cost to National City.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Authorize joining amicus curiae brief.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
L. ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
Letter from Los Angeles City Attorney
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
r
JAMES K. HAHN
CITY ATTORNEY
ffirr of tier City k.i.tornog
lave cAnsElPs, (llttlifarnin
CRIMINAL BRANCH
(213) 485.5452
CIVIL BRANCH
(213) 485-6370
WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL
NUMBERi213) 485-5483
February 5, 1999
TO: California Cities and City Attorneys
RE: Request to Cities to Join as Amicus in Amicus Brief in Support of the City of Los
Angeles in L.A. Alliance for Survival, et al. v. City ofLos Angeles, et al., S073451
On behalf of the City of Los Angeles, I join with the Legal Advocacy Committee
of the League of California Cities in urging you to add your city's name to an amicus
curiae brief which will be filed in the California Supreme Court in support of the City of
Los Angeles in the above -entitled case. The amicus brief is being prepared on a pro bono
basis by the law firm of Munger, Tolles & Olson, under the direction of Marc Becker and
Jeremy Rosen. This firm is familiar with the issues presented, having filed an amicus
curiae brief in this same case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
The certified issue presented in this appeal is: "What is the proper standard under
article I, section 2 of the California Constitution for analyzing the constitutionality of
ordinances governing solicitations, such as Los Angeles Ordinance No. 171664?"
Ordinance No. 171664 (copy enclosed) was enacted by the Los Angeles City Council on
July 2, 1997, in an effort to curb (1) aggressive solicitations carried out by threats or
intimidation and (2) solicitations in locations where public health and safety is
endangered. Because of the nature of the issues involved, this appeal may have a direct
impact on your city's ability to regulate all kinds of solicitations.
Shortly after Ordinance No. 171664 was enacted, plaintiffs in this case filed an
action for injunctive and declaratory relief to enjoin enforcement of the ordinance,
claiming that it violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States
Constitution and article I, section 2 of the California Constitution. On November 5, 1997,
the United States District Court granted plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction on
the ground that the ordinance violated California's Liberty of Speech Clause. The
District Court relied on a California Court of Appeals decision which held that laws
regulating solicitations are content -based. (Alternatives for California Women v. County
AN EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY — AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
EIGHTEENTH FLOOR. CITY HALL EAST • 200 N. MAIN STREET • LOS ANGELES CA 90012-4131 Propane w 'Imo can rumen.ave
Letter California Cities and City Attorneys
Page 2
of Contra Costa (1983) 145 Ca1.App.3d 436.) The Ninth Circuit then interpreted
Alternatives as based on broader speech rights under the California Constitution.
(Carreras v. City of Anaheim (9th Cir. 1985) 768 F.2d 1039.) We argued that Alternatives
was not based on a broader reading of the California Constitution —that it was based on
the First Amendment. United States Supreme Court cases construing the First
Amendment have held that regulations of solicitations are content -neutral. Because the
district court's interpretation of Alternatives needlessly restrains state and local
governments from regulating conduct that is detrimental to the public order and the
quality of life, we appealed the issuance of the preliminary injunction to the Ninth Circuit.
On January 1, 1998—while our appeal was pending before the Ninth
Circuit —California joined more than 40 other states who already had a "certification
process" by passing Rule 29.5, California Rules of Court. Pursuant to Rule 29.5, we
asked the Ninth Circuit to certify the state constitutional question to the California
Supreme Court to give the state court an opportunity to determine whether speech rights
under the California Constitution are parallel to speech rights under the First Amendment.
To my knowledge, this is the first time the Ninth Circuit has ever certified a question of
law to the California Supreme Court under this new rule. (L.A. Alliance for Survival, et
al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al. (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 1998) _ F.3d _ [Dock. No. 97-
56742].) By order filed November 4, 1998, the California Supreme Court accepted the
Ninth Circuit's request for certification.
Our Appellant's Opening Brief on the Merits was filed in the California Supreme
Court on January 4. 1999. As a threshold issue, we argued that face-to-face solicitations
accompanied by threats or intimidation or in locations which endanger the solicitee's
health or safety are not protected by the First Amendment and are not insulated by
California's Liberty of Speech Clause. We additionally argued that California follows the
federal time, place and manner test for analyzing regulations of speech in a public forum.
An integral part of the time, place and manner test is content -neutrality, which is also
governed by federal standards. Finally, we argued that the district court misapplied
California law when it held that privately -owned property "open to the public" becomes
public fora.
Respondents have requested an extension to March 5, 1999, to file their brief; and
our reply brief is due within 20 days of the filing of respondents' brief. The amicus brief
is 30 days after all briefs have been filed. (Rule 14, subd. (b), Cal. Rules of Court.)
The amicus brief will first argue that there is a long history of California
jurisprudence that authorizes properly tailored public forum solicitation ordinances under
Letter California Cities and City Attorneys
Page 3
the state's police power. Second, the amicus will argue that California law tracks federal
First Amendment jurisprudence and should not be interpreted more broadly. Finally, they
will argue that other similar ordinances across the country have been held to be
constitutionally valid.
If your city agrees to join, please complete the attached authorization and return it.
Mr. Becker and Mr. Rosen will be sending you a draft of their amicus brief on or about
March 1, 1999. Because the amicus brief will be due on or before March 25, 1999, we
would appreciate it if you would return your authorization by March 15. If you are unable
to respond by March 15 because you must secure a decision of the governing body of
your city, you may still join in the brief by returning the form to us after March 15.
However, it may be necessary to notify the Court of your joinder by letter after the brief is
filed.
We believe this is a matter of statewide concern to all cities, and that amicus
assistance will assist the court in clarifying the current state of California law regarding
local regulation of solicitations. Please join with the League of California Cities to
defend our efforts to regulate conduct which is detrimental to the quality of life in our
cities. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact Deputy City
Attorney Candice Horikawa or Assistant City Attorney Debbie Lew at (213) 485-5483.
We look forward to receiving your support.
Very truly yours,
��-v—
es K. Hahn
City Attorney
Enclosures
cc: Jeremy B. Rosen, Esq.
Marc A. Becker, Esq.
Document # 39684
AUTHORIZATION TO JOIN AMICUS BRIEF
I hereby authorize Munger, Tolles & Olson to include the City of
as an amicus curiae in the amicus brief they are preparing in the case of Los Angeles
Alliance for Survival, et al. v. City of Los Angeles, et al., California Supreme Court No.
S073451. I understand there is no financial contribution requirement for our
participation.
Signature -
Name (print or type).
Title.
State Bar Membership Number
Address -
City, State and Zip -
Telephone and Fax-
E-mail address-
n
a
Please return this form to:
Candice I. Horikawa, Deputy City Attorney
Los Angeles City Attorney's Office
200 North Main St., 1600 City Hall East
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Please check here if you would like a copy of Appellant's Opening Brief on the
Merits, which was filed on January 4, 1999.
ORDINANCE NO. 1716 6 4
An ordinance adding section 41.59 to Article I of Chapter IV of the Los
Angeles Municipal Code to prohibit aggressive soliciting.
WHEREAS, it is the intent of the Council in enacting this Ordinance to
improve the quality of life and economic vitality of the City, and to protect the safety of
the general public against certain abusive conduct of persons engaged in solicitation, by
imposing reasonable manner and place restrictions on solicitation while respecting the
constitutional rights of free speech for all citizens, and
WHEREAS, the Council finds that an increase in aggressive solicitation
throughout the city has become extremely disturbing and disruptive to residents and
businesses, and has contributed not only to the loss of access to and enjoyment of public
places, but also to an enhanced sense of fear, intimidation and disorder, and
WHEREAS, aggressive panhandling usually includes approaching or following
pedestrians, the use of abusive language, unwanted physical contact, or the intentional
blocking of pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The Council further finds that the presence of
individuals who solicit money from persons at or near banks or automated teller machines
is especially threatening and dangerous. Motorists also find themselves confronted by
persons who without permission wash their automobile windows at traffic intersections,
despite explicit indications by drivers not to do so. Such activity often carries with it an
implicit threat to both person and property. People driving or parking on city streets
frequently find themselves faced with panhandlers seeking money by offering to perform
"services" such as opening car doors or locating parking spaces, and
WHEREAS, the Council further finds as abusive the solicitation of people in
places where they are a "captive audience" in which it is impossible or difficult for them to
exercise their own right to decline to listen to or to avoid solicitation from others. Such
places include buses, subways, and trains; parking lots and structures; and indoor and outdoor
dining areas. Restricting solicitation in such places will provide a balance between the rights
of solicitors and the rights of persons who wish to decline or avoid such solicitations, and
will help avoid or diminish the threat of violence in such unwarranted and unavoidable
confrontations, and
WHEREAS, this law is timely and appropriate because current laws and city
regulations are insufficient to address the aforementioned problems. The restrictions
contained herein are neither overbroad nor vague and are narrowly tailored to serve a
substantial governmental interest. Furthermore, in enacting this legislation, the Council
recognizes the availability of community service and other sentencing alternatives, which
1
•
may be appropriate remedies for violations of this law. The goal of this law is to protect
citizens from the fear and intimidation accompanying certain kinds of solicitation that have.
become an unwelcome and overwhelming presence in the city.
NOW THEREFORE,
'HE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES
DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Chapter IV of the Los Angeles Municipal Code is hereby
amended by adding a new Section 41.59 thereto, to read as follows:
SEC. 41.59. PROHIBITION AGAINST CERTAIN FORMS OF
AGGRESSIVE SOLICITATION.
(a) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) "Solicit, ask or beg" shall include using the spoken, written, or
printed word, or bodily gestures, signs or other means with the purpose of
obtaining an immediate donation of money or other thing of value or soliciting the
sale of goods or services.
(2) "Public place" shall mean a place to which the public or a substantial
group of persons has access, and includes, but is not limited to, any street,
highway, sidewalk, parking lot, plaza transportation facility, school, place of
amusement, park, playground, and any doorway, entrance, hallway, lobby and
other portion of any business establishment, an apartment house or hotel not
constituting a room or apartment designed for actual residence.
(b) Aggressive Solicitation prohibited.
(1) No person shall solicit. ask or beg in an aggressive manner in any
public place.
(2) "Aggressive manner" shall mean any of the following:
(A) Approaching or speaking to a person, or following a person
before. during or after soliciting, asking or begging, if that conduct is
intended or is likely to cause a reasonable person to (i) fear bodily harm to
2
oneself or to another, damage to or loss of property, or (ii) otherwise be
intimidated into giving money or other thing of value;
(B) Intentionally touching or causing physical contact with
another person or an occupied vehicle without that person's consent in the
course of soliciting, asking or begging;
(C) Intentionally blocking or interfering with the safe or free
passage of a pedestrian or vehicle by any means, including unreasonably
causing a pedestrian or vehicle operator to take evasive action to avoid
physical contact;
•(D) Using violent or threatening gestures toward a person
solicited either before, during, or after soliciting, asking or begging;
(E) Persisting in closehv following or approaching a person, after
the person solicited has been solicited and informed the solicitor by words
or conduct that such person does not want to be solicited or does not want
to give money or any other thing of value to the solicitor, or
(F) Using profane, offensive or abusive language which is
inherently likely to provoke an immediate violent reaction, either before,
during, or after solicitation.
(c) All solicitation prohibited at specified locations.
(1) Banks and ATMs. No person shall solicit, ask or beg within 15 feet
of any entrance or exit of any bank, savings and loan association, credit union, or
check cashing business during its business hours or within 15 feet of any
automated teller machine during the time it is available for customers' use.
Provided, however, that when an automated teller machine is located within an
automated teller machine facility, such distance shall be measured from the
entrance or exit of the automated teller machine facility. Provided further that no
person shall solicit, ask or beg within an automated teller machine facility where a
reasonable person would or should know that he or she does not have the
permission to do so from the owner or other person lawfully in possession of such
facility. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prohibit the lawful
vending of goods and services within such areas.
3
•
(A) Defmitions. For purposes of this section:
(i) "Bank" means any member bank of the Federal
Reserve System, and any bank, banking association, trust company,
savings bank, or other banking institution organized or operated
under the laws of the United States, and any bank the deposits of
which are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
(ii) "Savings and loan association" means any federal
savings and loan association and any "insured institution" as defined
in Section 401 of the National Housing Act, as amended, and any
federal credit union as defined in Section 2 of the Federal Credit
Union Act.
(iii) "Credit union" means any federal credit union and any
state -chartered credit union the accounts of which are insured by the
Administrator of the National Credit Union Administration.
(iv) "Check cashing business" means any person duly
licensed as a check seller, bill payer, or prorater pursuant to Division
3 of the California Financial Code, commencing with section 12000.
(v) "Automated teller machine" shall mean any electronic
information processing device which accepts or dispenses cash in
connection with a credit, deposit, or convenience account.
(vi) "Automated teller machine facility" shall mean the
area comprised of one or more automated teller machines, and any
adjacent space which is made available to banking customers after
regular banking hours.
(B) Exemptions. The provisions of subdivision (c)(1) shall not
apply to any unenclosed automated teller machine located within any
building, structure or space whose primary purpose or function is unrelated
to banking activities, including but not limited to supermarkets, airports and
school buildings, provided that such automated teller machine shall be
available for use only during the regular hours of operation of the building,
structure or space in which such machine is located.
4
(2) Motor vehicles and parking lots.
(A) Motor vehicles. No person shall approach an operator or
occupant of a motor vehicle for the purpose of soliciting, asking or begging
while such vehicle is located in any public place.
(B) Parking lots. No person shall solicit, ask or beg in any public
parking lot or structure any time after dark. "After dark" means any time
from one-half hour after sunset to one-half hour before sunrise.
(C) Exemptions. Subdivision (c)(2) shall not apply to any of the
following:
(3)
(i) to solicitations related to business which is being
conducted on the subject premises by the owner or lawful tenants;
(ii) to solicitations related to the lawful towing of a
vehicle; or
(iii) to solicitations related to emergency repairs requested
by the operator or other occupant of a vehicle.
Public transportation vehicles and stops.
(A) "Public transportation vehicle" shall mean any vehicle,
including a trailer bus, designed, used or maintained for carrying 10 or more
persons, including the driver; or a passenger vehicle designed for carrying
fewer than 10 persons, including the driver, and used to carry passengers for
hire.
(B) Any person who solicits, asks or begs in any public
transportation vehicle, or within ten feet of any designated or posted public
transportation vehicle stop, is guilty of a violation of this section if:
(i) He or she remains there after being asked to leave by
the owner, driver, or operator of a public transportation vehicle; the
agent of the owner, driver or operator of a public transportation
vehicle; the owner or manager of a public transportation facility; the
agent of the owner or manager of a public transportation facility; a
member of a security force employed by the public transportation
facility; or by a peace officer, as defined in Chapter 4.5 of Title 3 of
the California Penal Code (commencing with Pen. Code, § 830); or
(ii) Within the immediately preceding 30 days, he or she
engaged in a solicitation at that location and had been asked to leave
by a person specified in subdivision (c)(3)(B)(i), above.
(iii) Subdivision (c)(3)(B)(ii) is not violated if a person
who has been requested to leave enters the property within the
designated period and solicits, asks, or begs with the express
authorization of a person specified in subdivision (c)(3)(B)(i).
(4) Restaurants. Any person who solicits, asks, or begs in any outdoor
or indoor dining area of a restaurant or other establishment serving food for
immediate consumption is guilty of a violation of this section if:
(A) He or she remains there after being asked to leave by the
owner, manager or supervisor of the restaurant or other food establishment;
the agent of the owner, manager or supervisor of the restaurant; a member
of a security force employed by the restaurant; or by a peace officer, as
defined in Chapter 4.5 of Title 3 of the California Penal Code (commencing
with Pen. Code, § 830), acting at the request of any of the persons specified
in this subdivision; or
(B) Within the immediately preceding 30 days, he or she engaged
in a solicitation at that location and had been asked to leave by a person
specified in subdivision (c)(4)(A), above.
(C) Subdivision (c)(4)(B) is not violated if a person who has been
requested to leave enters the property within the designated period and
solicits, asks, or begs with the express authorization of a person specified in
subdivision (c)(4)(A).
(d) Penalty. A violation of this Section is punishable as a misdemeanor or
infraction, chargeable at the City Attorney's discretion'
(e) SeverabiIity. The provisions of this ordinance are declared to be separate
and severable. The invalidity of any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section or
portion of this ordinance, or the invalidity of the application thereof to any person or
circumstance shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this ordinance, or the
validity of its application to other persons or circumstances.
(f) Non -exclusivity. Nothing in this chapter shall limit or preclude the
enforcement of other applicable laws.
6
Sec. 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and .
cause the same to be published in some daily newspaper printed and published in the City
of Los Angeles.
I hereby certify that the foreg
oing ordinance was introduced
at the meeting of the Council of the City of Los Angeles JUN 2 5 1997
and was passed at its meeting of JUL 0 2 1997
J. MICHAEL CAREY, City Clerk
7
By
Approved
Deputy
Approved as to Form and L¢gality
James,k. Hahn, CityAttorney
By
EARL E. THOMAS
Assistant City Attorney
File No. 96-0146, SI
JUL 7
7
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
02/16/99 4
MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO
% ITEM TITLE
REQUEST TO ENTER ANTIQUE FIRE ENGINE IN THE MAYTIME BAND
REVIEW
PREPARED BY
Randy Kimble,
EXPLANATION Fire Chief
DEPARTMENT
Fire
The Executive Director of the Maytime Band Review has asked the Fire
Department to enter the antique fire engine in this year's parade, which
will be held on May 1, 1999. It is requested that the City Council
approve the use of this vehicle in the parade and authorize Miss
National City to ride on the vehicle.
The approximate cost for a certified driver would be $120.00. The Fire
Department will adhere to the policy and procedures as established in
City Council Policy #111, "Utilization of City Vehicles in Parades".
Environmental Review _x N/A
Financial Statement
Funds are available in the Operations Division Budget.
Account Nod101_-d1 7-1 75-1 02
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve request as submitted.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
andy K*f bl , Fire Chief
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. Letter from Edith Hughes, Executive Director, Maytime Band Review.
A•200 (Rev. 9/80)
PHONE: (619) 475-6124
FAX: (619) 475-6124
February 8, 1999
Mr. Randy Kimble, Fire Chief
333 East 16th Street
National City, CA 91950
P.O. BOX 1298
NATIONAL CITY, CA 91951
RECEIVED BY
National City Fire Dept
FEB 10 1999
70191101111141121344516
Dear Randy:
Once again we are requesting National City's Antique Fire Engine to be in the V
Maytime Band Review Parade on Saturday, May 1, 1999, 10:30 a.m. �/
As usual, the new Miss National City would be riding on the fire truck. The
Parade again starts at 28t° and Highland, proceeds north on Highland Avenue to
16th Street, west on 16th to "D" Avenue. The driver and fire engine should be at
the parade formation area by 10 a.m. that morning.
The beautiful fire engine makes a good addition to our parade.
Please let me know at your earliest convenience if you can participate as
requested.
Sincerely,
Edith A. Hughes
Executive Director
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE February 16, 1999
5
AGENDA ITEM NO.
(-ITEM TITLE
USE OF THE COMMUNITY BUILDING BY SWEETWATER HIGH'S MARINE CORPS JUNIOR
RESERVE OFFICERS TRAINING CORPS (MCJROTC) FOR A PARENTS POTLUCK DINNER AND
WAIVER OF FEES
PREPARED BY C.R. Williams, Jr/' DEPARTMENT Public Works
EXPLANATION
The Marine Corps Junior R.O.T.C. program is an Educational activity organized and sponsored by a
school located in National City; and as such is authorized use of the Community Building by the
Community Center Rules and Regulations.
The fees are: Hall: $762.19
Kitchen: 50.00
Custodial: 161.97
Total: $974.16
Waiver of fees is requested by the MCJROTC per the attached letter.
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
X N/A
Loss of $974.16 to the General Fund if fees are waived.
Account No. N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Council decision on waiver of fees is r ested.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No.
Marine Corps. Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps letter of February 1, 1999.
A-2200 ,9 8C
MC,rROTC UNIT
Sweetwater High School
2900 Highland Avenue
National City, CA 91950-7495
Honorable George Waters
Mayor, National City
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, CA 91950
Dear Mayor Waters,
February i, 1999
It is once again time to begin the planning Ior our end of the year potluck dinner and
awards ceremony for our Marine Corps Junior ROTC cadets and their parents. With this
in mind, it is respectfully requested that we be allowed to utilize the services and room in
the National City Community Center.
We plan on holding our ceremony on Friday evening, May 28, during the approximate
hours from ,: J0 P.M. — 9:30 P.M., contingent on you approval or our using the Iacility. It
is also requested that any fees for the use of the facility be waived.
I look forward to hearing from your office in the near future so that we can make our
plans accordingly.
Please pass to the entire city council my personal appreciation for all of the support we
have received and continue to receive. It really means a lot to have you behind us.
Sincerely,
R.L. Hanthom
Colonel U.S. Marine Corps (Retired)
Senior Marine instructor
LCD
c.)
be filed.
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE February 16, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NO 6
ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION - MODIFICATION OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMEN I FERMI
AND A ZONE VARIANCE TO CONVERT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX RECREATION ROOM INTO A
DWELLING UNIT WITHOUT THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AT 924-926 "N" AVE.
CASE FILE NOs.: M1-PD-1974-64; Z-1998-4
PREPARED BY Ron Santos - Assistant Planner R DEPARTMENT Planning
EXPLANATION The owner of Pepperhill Apartments requests approval to convert the complex's recreation
room into a 502 square foot studio apartment. According to the former owners, the room had been converted into
a dwelling unit without permits prior to their having purchased the property in 1976. It had been utilized as an
apartment without incident until August 1997, when the City received a complaint concerning its condition. The
conversion would increase the number of units on the site to 34, the maximum permitted by zoning.
The applicant also requests a variance to allow the conversion without provision of two additional parking
stalls otherwise required. Currently there are 48 stalls on site - 15 less than required if applying today's
standards. However, since the site is lawful non -conforming, the Code only requires an increase in parking
corresponding to the number of units being added. Staff found numerous spaces available during each of two
visits to the site (made outside of typical work day hours), despite there reportedly being only one vacant unit
in the complex.
The Commission found the proposed conversion supportive of General Plan policies related to provision and
preservation of housing in the City and noted that the site lacks space to provide additional parking stalls. One
commissioner expressed concerns regarding the potential to set a precedent for allowing inadequate parking at
apartment complexes. No testimony from the public was presented at the hearing, except that heard from the
applicant in support of the project.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision
K
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted to approve the application.
Vote: Ayes: Large, Martinelli, Ungab, Valderrama
Nays: Detzer
1. - armm�g ommission Ke oed lution No. 1-99
2. Location Map
Resolution No
A-200 R. '.' O
RESOLUTION NO. 1-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
AND A ZONE VARIANCE TO CONVERT AN APARTMENT COMPLEX
RECREATION ROOM INTO A DWELLING UNIT WITHOUT THE REQUIRED
NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES AT 924-926 "N" AVENUE.
APPLICANT: WALTER MORAWA
CASE FILE NOs. M1-PD-1974-64; Z-1998-4
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Modifi-
cation of a Planned Development Permit and a Zone Variance to convert an apartment complex
recreation room into a dwelling unit without the required number of parking spaces at a duly ad-
vertised public hearing held on January 4, 1999, at which time oral and documentary evidence
was presented; and.
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report
contained in Case File Nos. M1-PD-1974-64 and Z-1998-4, which is maintained by the City and
incorporated herein by reference; along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State
law and City law; and,
WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of pub-
lic health, safety, and general welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
National City. California. that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission
at the public hearing held on January 4, 1999, support the following findings:
FNDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED
DEVFLOPN/IFNT PERMIT MODIFICATION
1. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since (1) the proposed studio
apartment would be located in an existing building with available floor area to accommodate
the proposed unit in a manner consistent with minimum floor area requirements and (2) the
maximum density standard applicable to the site will be observed.
The site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement
type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since N Avenue. the
existing access way, is paved per City specifications and provides sufficient capacity to
accommodate the less than significant increase in traffic generated by the additional apartment.
3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties. since
said use. a 502 square foot dwelling unit to be located within an existing multi -family apartment
complex. is compatible with existing and permitted uses surrounding the project site. and will
be established in observance of applicable density standards.
4. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare,
since the provision and preservation of housing in the City is recognized as a valued objective
by the General Plan.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE 7ONF. VARTANCF
1. Because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography,
location or surroundings, the strict application of Title 18 of the Municipal Code (Zoning)
deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the
identical zone classification, since the property lacks space for additional on -site parking and
the lot's narrow street frontage creates a hardship by minimizing opportunities to provide on -
street guest parking in accordance with provisions of the Municipal Code.
2. The requested variance is subject to such conditions which will assure that the adjustment
authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon
other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated, since conditions
applied will ensure that all applicable health and safety regulations are observed in the course of
exercising this entitlement, and since the variance, by offsetting a hardship related to parking,
allows the property to be developed at the density standard applied to other properties in the
same zone.
3. The variance does not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by
the zoning regulations governing the parcel of property, since the proposed use, a 502 square
foot studio apartment, is permitted in the applicable zone pursuant to planned development
permit approval. Moreover, the variance supports General Plan policies related to the provision
and preservation of housing in the City.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Modification of a Planned
Development Permit and for a Zone Variance is approved subject to the following conditions:
1. A concrete sidewalk and associated street improvements, including adjustment of he existing
utility vault as necessary to match the new sidewalk, shall be constructed along the eastern
property line. north of the driveway.
2. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within
the public right-of-way. A performance bond will be required prior to approval of the permit.
3. A building permit shall be obtained for conversion of the space. Plans submitted in conjunction
with the permit application shall show compliance with the 1994 Uniform Building Code.
Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code: the 1993 National Elecr. cal Code: and
State of California Title 24 energy codes.
4. A smoke detector and one 2-A:10-B:C fire extinguisher shall be provided in the new dwelling
unit.
5. Except as reeuired by conditions of approval. tenant improvement plans shall be submitted for
review and approval by the Planning Director in substantial conformance with Exhibit A. Case
File No. fill-PD-1971.-64 and Z-I998—=. dated 11/16/98. Submitted plans shall show a
minimum floor area of 500 square feet for the proposed studio apattmment.
6. Before this Planned Development Permit Modification and Zone Variance becomes effective,
both the applicant and the property owner shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form,
provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed
upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form
within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit
Modification and Zone Variance. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of
the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County
Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of
Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of this Planned
Development Permit Modification and Zone Variance are binding on all present or future
interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as
to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation.
7. This Planned Development Permit Modification strictly authorizes the conversion of a club
house previously approved per PD-1974-64 into a studio apartment. No additional parking
spaces shall be required for this approval to become effective. All other restrictions proscribed
by PD-I974-64 shall remain in effect, unless modified in accordance with the provisions of the
National City Municipal Code.
8. This Planned Development Permit Modification and Zone Variance shall become null and void
if not concurrently exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless
extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to
the applicant and to the City Council.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on
the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for
review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of
that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the
Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing.
CERTIFICATION:
This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of
February 1. 1999. by the following vote:
AYES: UNGAB, LARGE, VALDERRAMA, M.ARTINELLI.
NAYS: DET_ZER
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: GODSHALK, BACA.
CHAIRMAN
-8 t h•-1
771 PROJECT SITE
SCALE:
"?T5.
P
NORTH
I
0
PROPOSED
.;APARTMENT
.. .ST 3:.FF-
Y n 1
92'
w
. 941
RM-1-PD
SOO
/02/
ne^ieAi�A^ 1
;5.... i \ab A69
t
,A'
IA75
/477
/4479
/4B/
/483
/4
/487
/489
/ 99/3 /4
/499
EXISTING BUILDINGS
J
I
I
c
s
-
r
y
844
846
- w
RM.-2-PD
166
940
/06
RS—n3 I
940
h
I
CL
- I
I
//04
RIM ZEN III
i
RS-2
RM-2
-PD yam,
I
- ZONE BOUNCARY
LOCATION MAP
924-946 "N' AVENUE
Z-1998-4
M I-PD-1974-64
NATIONAL CITY PLANNING
DR': DATE:
72-7 -98
PC
HEARING:
-oa
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
7
MEETING DATEFebruary 16, 1999 AGENDA ITEM NO.
r. ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A MORTUARY AT
2200 HIGHLAND AVENUE (CASE FILE NO. CUP-1998-9)
PREPARED BY Jon Cain - Assistant PlannerDEPARTMENT Planning
EXPLANATION.
The applicant proposes a mortuary to be located in an existing building at 2200 Highland Avenue. The
project involves remodeling the interior of the structure and repairing the exterior of the structure. The use is
located in the General Commercial zone and thus requires a Conditional Use Permit.
The proposed use will primarily involve funeral services in a chapel with seating for 140 persons. No crema-
tions will take place at the site. There site contains facilities for preparation of the deceased in accordance
with State law, although the applicant intends to perform such activities primarily offsite. The proposed site
includes more parking than required.
The applicant and the property manager spoke in favor of the project at the public hearing. The property
manager stated that the building has been vacant for a few years, and nearby residents were opposed to the
continued use of the property as a restaurant due to alcohol -related crime associated with the restaurant. The
property manager said there has been a positive reaction to the mortuary project from nearby residents. No
further testimony from the public was presented.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and
be filed.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission voted to approve the Conditional Use Permit.
Vote: Ayes - Unanimous
recommends that the Notice of Decision
TTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. 131anning Commission Resolution No. 2-99
2. Location Map
Resolution No.
A•lza (Re.. ',teal
RESOLUTION NO. 2-99
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A MORTUARY
AT 2200 HIGHLAND AVENUE
APPLICANT: MARTIN MITCHELL
CASE FILE NO. CUP-1998-9
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a
Conditional Use Permit application for a mortuary at 2200 Highland Avenue at a duly advertised
public hearing held on January 4, 1999, at which time oral and documentary evidence was
presented; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report
contained in Case File No. CUP-1998-9 and a Notice of Exemption maintained by the City and
incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State
law and City law; and,
WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of
public health, safety, and general welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission
at the public hearing held on January 4, 1999, support the following findings:
1. The site proposed is adequate in size and shape, since the use will be established in
an existing building with adequate floor space to accommodate the use proposed;
and a sufficient number of parking spaces are available.
The site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed
use, since the property is a developed commercial site situated on Highland Avenue,
an arterial street. in close proximity to 24th Street. also an arterial street, and the use
is projected to generate less traffic than the previously permitted restaurant use.
3. The proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting
properties for the following reasons: the existing vacant building will be utilized and
improved by way of interior remodeling, repair to the exterior of the building, and
landscape maintenance: the use is compatible with the surrounding commercial
businesses and is separated from residences by public streets/alleys: and an adequate
number of parking spaces will be provided.
4. The proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and
welfare. since the facility will provide a necessary service and utilize unused
commercial space.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit is approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. Plans submitted for building permits must comply with the 1994 Uniform Buiiriing
Code. Uniform Mechanical Code, and Uniform Plumbing Code; the 1993 National
Electrical Code; and State Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations.
2. A trash enclosure in accordance with City standards shall be provided. It shall have
an exterior to match the building.
3. Exterior walls of buildings, freestanding signs, and the trash enclosure shall be
treated with "Graffiti Meit Coating" manufactured by Genesis Coatings. Inc., to a
height of not less than 6 feet. A similar product may be used, subject to approval
from the Building and Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of
its observance.
4. Wheel stops within the parking lot which have been dislocated shall be realigned.
5. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property
frontages shall be removed and replaced. Specifically, a 5 foot by 10 foot secion of
the sidewalk along Highland Avenue, the concrete sidewalk at Highland and 2.2nd
Street curb return, and the cracked 6 inch curb at the alley building entrance. All
associated tree roots shall be cut back.
6. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement
work within the Public Right -of -Way.
7. A performance bond for all of the required street improvement work shall be posted
prior to the approval of the building permit.
8. Except as required by conditions of approval, development plans shall be sub Witted
for review and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit A.
Case File No. CUP-1998-9, dated December 9, 1998.
9. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicantand e
property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form. provided d by
the Planning. Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions :.-__ used
upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized
Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically te.r ina:e the
Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the sadsfa:tion
of the Planning. Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is -ec:rded
wit:.: e County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees :a e
i
County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions
imposed by approval of Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future
interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be
approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior
to recordation.
10. Use of the property as authorized by this Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to
a mortuary with a chapel, associated offices, and preparatory facilities. Cremations
shall be prohibited.
11. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after
adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to the procedures
specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the
applicant and to the City Council.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the dz
following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unlers
an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council
meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission a*z..:
set the matter for public hearing.
CERTIFICATION:
This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of
February 1, 1999 by the following vote:
AYES: U\C-_ E, LARGE, VALDERRAMA, MARTINELLI, DETZER.
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN: _SHALK, BACA.
7zcfa
CHAIRMAN
2004
RS-3
I■
-PD .
2040 2036a
2044:
-__~ a mar ■i
RS-3
2430 w
71
w
21st
p
2/05
•
204
2//5 RM-1-PD
2/2/
2/3/
2/35
2/39
■
2/35
2/24
MAAI- I 1038
2/30 1
2/42 CD
• i
-- 22 nd -----+
5
r--STREET_
2//5-
1
2/20
2/40
a
RM-2-PD
ALLEY
0P
:230
232/
9
23
6
STREET —
I
I
RM-2-PD
a
240$
2428
00
1110
2005
MAP
2027
203"
J
I
1
2/04
2/24
2/20
2/26
2/28
2/30
2/40
N
•
2204
2214
2235
2239
2241.
• 23rd
2228
2230
2232
224C
230! A
230/83 3
2305
I
I
t
2204
2214
23/3
23/8
? rv5
2335
1
2335
I
2337
m
Q.
i
1
24th-_S
a
2007
20/5
2025
203/
2006
RS-3-PD
2025
2039r
2040
a R
•�S
h
2/07
2125
o/.
a
2!16
- - 4 2/24
2130
2/38
2/34
RT
9.
A
■
2210
2218
2225
2302
2304
23/2
2332
240/
RS-2
N
2408
24/6
:CI 1
—ZONE BOUNDARY
PROJECT SITE
SCALE:
1" = 200'
1
NORTH
0 25 50
FEET
LOCATION MAP
2200 Highland Ave
CUP 1998-9
NATIONAL CITY PLANNING
DRN. DATE:
12/14/9S
REVISIONS.
HEARING:
1i4i