HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997 10-28 CC AGENDA PKTt r
AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING
NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CIVIC CENTER
1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY - OCTOBER 28, 1997 - 6:00 P.M.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO
THE CITY CLERK
IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO
YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO
KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY CITY MANAGER, TOM G.
MCCABE
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER
21, 1997.
COUNCIL AGENDA
10/28/97 Page 2
MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
The First United Methodist Church of National City.
PROCLAMATIONS
Proclaiming October 28, 1997 to be: "DOLORES FINCHER DAY"
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Public Hearing - Amendment to Title 18 (Zoning) of the National City
Municipal Code regarding regulations pertaining to service stations, sale
of gasoline and alcohol, and mini -markets (City initiated). Case File No.:
A-1997-4. (Planning)
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters which are of a
routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by
approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item
may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately
considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of
the public.
2. Resolution No. 97-139
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting and
authorizing the filing of the Notice of Completion for the miscellaneous
curb, gutter, sidewalk, cross -gutter, pavement, and pedestrian ramp
improvements at various locations of the City. (Engineering Spec. No. 97-1)
(Engineering)
COUNCIL AGENDA
10/28/97 Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
3. Resolution No. 97-140
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the
Mayor to enter into an Agreement with the City of San Diego for the funding
of the federally mandated Storm Water Permit and Toxic Clean-up Program
fees (1997-98). (Engineering)
4. Resolution No. 97-141
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the
Mayor to enter into an Agreement with the City of San Diego for funding of
the federally mandated Storm Water Monitoring Program (1997-98).
(Engineering)
5. Resolution No. 97-142
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the
Mayor to enter into an Agreement with the City of San Diego, a Principal
Permittee, to pay the City 's share for the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) education effort. (Engineering)
6. WARRANT REGISTER #17 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $181,584.01
7. Claim for Damages: Evelyn N. Woodsum. (City Clerk)
8. Claim for Damages: Ashley and Elizabeth Balough. (City Clerk)
9. Claim for Damages: Robert Hightower and Margie Kirk. (City Clerk)
COUNCIL AGENDA
10/28/97 Page 4
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
10. Claim for Damages: Nationwide Insurance for Ann and James Arnold.
(City Clerk)
NEW BUSINESS
11. Report on the City -owned real property on the east side of Clairmont
Avenue, between Melrose and First Streets, A.P.N. 554-242-17.
(Engineering)
12. Use of Community Building by Sweetwater High's Marine Corps Junior
Reserve Officers Training Corps (MCJROTC) for an award ceremony on
December 12, 1998, and waiver of fees. (Public Works)
> CITY MANAGER
> CITY ATTORNEY
—> OTHER STAFF
MAYOR
> CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL AGENDA
10/28/97 Page 5
NEW BUSINESS (Cont.)
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit)
NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought
back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated
emergency or urgent nature.
CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION -
Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Herb Fox, et al. v. County of San
Diego, et al; County of San Diego v. City of National City and Community
Development Commission of the City of National City; City of National City,
Community Development Commission of the City of National City v. State
Water Resources Control Board, et al.
ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular City Council Meeting - November 4, 1997 - 3:00 p.m. -
Council Chambers, Civic Center.
TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO
IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
11riirtamatunt
She has extensive sensitivity experience working with families and children in
distress; and
Three years ago she was recruited by the National City Fire Department to
implement and serve as the Director of the National City Crisis Team; and
She oversees a team of volunteers that respond seven days a week, 24
hours a day to assist families in dealing with traumatic events in their life;
and
She is also a member of the National City Neighborhood Watch Council, a
member of the National City Citizens Patrol, and a Member of the Navy
Toxic Waste Advisory Board; and
She recently was one of three recipients to receive the prestigious South
Bay Women of Distinction Award sponsored by the South Bay Community
Services Family Violence Prevention and Intervention Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE H. WATERS, Mayor of the City of National
City, do hereby proclaim October 28, 1997 to be:
"DOLORES FINCHER DAY"
in National City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of
National City be affixed this 28th day of OCTOBER, 1997.
GEORGE H. WATERS�s,
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
1
MEETING DATE October 28, 1997 AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF THE NATIONAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SERVICE STATIONS, SALE OF GASOLINE
AND ALCOHOL, AND MINI -MARKETS. (CITY INITIATED) CASE FILE NO.: A-1997-4.
PREPARED BY Harold Phelps
DEPARTMENT Planning
EXPLANATION This amendment is proposed in response to recent litigation which requires the
City to accept applications for the sale of alcohol at gas stations. The proposal would maintain the City's
conditional use permit (CUP) requirements for the sale of alcohol. The Planning Commission
recommended approval of the amendment at its September 15 hearing.
It is expected that proposals for the sale of alcohol at gas stations will involve additional display
area or a mini -market. The amendment adds a CUP requirement for the potential establishment of mini -
markets at gas stations. In addition, it specifies that mini -markets would not be permitted if not
otherwise allowed by zoning and Land Use Code standards.
The City has refused in past years to lift its prohibition on mini -markets at gas stations. This
stance was taken at least in part to maintain legal authority to prohibit the sale of alcohol at these
establishments. The recent litigation negates that rationale.
Mini -markets may involve prepared food service. This would not necessarily result in a fast food
restaurant, particularly if no seating or drive-thru facility were provided. No code changes are proposed
regarding fast food restaurants, which cannot be established within 300 ft. of a residential zone nor
without a CUP.
The City Council has the option of modifying the proposal. An ordinance reflecting action taken
would be introduced at an upcoming meeting.
X
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
N/A
Exempt
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
egr
Staff concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commission.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommended approval.
Vote: Ayes - unanimous
TT HMENT5 (Listed Below) Resolution No
1. Proposed Amendment 3. Notice of Exemption
2. Recommended Finding for Approval 4. Planning Commission Staff Report
A•200 (Rev_ 9/80)
PROPOSED AMENDMENT
Note: Deletions are denoted by ctrikethrough, and additions are in bold.
18.16.170 Sale of gasoline.
The sale of gasoline only may be permitted as an accessory use in any
zone where gasoline service stations are permitted, to an automotive
related business may be permitted in any commercial zone, subject to the
issuance of a conditional use permit.
18.98.170 Sale of gasoline as an accessory use.
A. The sale of gasoline as an accessory use to a permitted use shall
require the issuance of a conditional use permit.
B. The sale of gasoline as an accessory use will be allowed only in
zones in which the sale of gasoline as a principal use is allowed;
-,l 1 1, J t.-. o idet.,l te_an to „ti a elated
business.
18.98.190 General statement Sale of nonautomotive products at service
stations.
The sale of gas line is prohibited except in service stations . The sale of
nonautomotive products in service stations is prohibited except that
service stations may sell motorist convenience products for immediate
consumption; provided, that permitted as follows:
A. Such products must be displayed within an enclosed permanent
building , behind a sales counter, > tl of sib e to
customers.
B. The display area shall be a maximum of two hundred sixteen cubic
feet, except that a conditional use permit may be issued
pursuant to Chapter 18.116 of this title to authorize additional
areas of display, where such use is otherwise permitted by this
title. The sale of any alcoholic beverages is prohibited,
regardless of the display area, unless specifically authorized by
a conditional use permit in accordance with Chapter 18.116 of
this title.
RECOMMENDED FINDING FOR APPROVAL
1. Find that the Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan, since the General
Plan contains policies which encourage adoption and review of appropriate
regulations and procedures, and the amendment will bring the Code into conformance
with applicable State laws. Also, the amendment will continue to provide only for
uses already encouraged in accordance with the combined General Plan/Zoning Map.
City of National City
Planning Department
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310
ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
TO: County Clerk
County of San Diego
P.O. Box 1750
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 260
San Diego, CA 92112
Project Title: Amendment to Title 18 (Zoning) of the National City Municipal Code regarding
regulations pertaining to service stations, sale of gasoline and alcohol, and mini -
markets (A-1997-4).
Project Location: Citywide
Contact Person: Harold Phelps, Assistant Planner Telephone: (619) 336-4310
Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: The amendment will address
regulations pertaining to service stations, sale of gasoline and alcohol, and mini -markets.
Applicant: City of National City, California Telephone: (619) 336-4310
Exempt Status:
❑ Statutory Exemption. State type and Section No.
❑ Categorical Exemption. State type and Section No.
❑ Not a project as defined in Section 15378 of CEQA
✓ Not subject to CEQA (Sec. 15061(b)(3))
O This project has been found to have a "de minimus" impact on fish and wildlife. There is
no potential for any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife
resources.
Reason why project is exempt: There is no possibility that the proposal will have a significant
environmental effect, since the amendment is limited to addressing regulations pertaining to service
stations, sale of gasoline and alcohol, and mini -markets. Furthermore, CEQA provides that economic
and social changes resulting from a project shall not be treated as sijgoificant effects on the environment.
Date:
Signature
PlanningDirector
Title
c:\winword\pc,ep ts\a97-4\exempt doc
Recycled Paper
Title:
City of National City
Planning Department
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310
ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR
item no. 2
September 15, 1997
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 (ZONING) OF
THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING
REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO SERVICE STATIONS, SALE
OF GASOLINE AND ALCOHOL, AND MINI -MARKETS.
Location: Citywide
Case file no: A-1997-4
Staff report by: Harold Phelps, Assistant Planner
Applicant: City of National City
Environmental review: Exempt
BACKGROUND
The National City Land Use Code, Chapter 18 (Zoning) contains specific requirements
restricting the sale of non -automotive products at gas stations. The Code also prohibits
the sale of any alcoholic beverages in concurrence with the sale of motor vehicle fuel.
Furthermore, it prohibits the sale of gasoline except at auto -related businesses.
As a result of recent litigation, the City must accept applications for proposals that
include the concurrent sale of motor vehicle fuel and alcohol. It is expected that these
applications will also proposeto sell products typically found in a mini -market. This may
include sales of prepared food, which would not constitute a fast food restaurant if no
seating were provided. The attached sections of the code are proposed for modification to
accommodate future applications. They require that a conditional use permit be approved
to allow the anticipated uses.
As mentioned above, the Code also now prohibits the sale of gasoline except at auto -
related businesses. It would seem logical to allow for gasoline sales at mini -markets or
other establishments, if a conditional use permit is approved, in light of the other
proposed changes. The code amendment covers this option.
Recycled Paper
The sale of gasoline and other uses such as mini -markets would be permitted in
combination only where they are already individually allowed by applicable zoning. For
example, a fast-food restaurant with seating could not be permitted if restricted by the
Code due to proximity within 300 feet of a residential zone. It would also require
commercial zoning, as would a mini -market facility.
Development standards already in effect would also apply to the proposed uses. Mini -
markets, for example, would be required to provide parking and conform with all other
zoning standards and the City's Design Guidelines.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Recommend approval of the amendment, based on the attached finding; or
2. Recommend approval of a modified version of the amendment, as determined by the
Planning Commission; or
3. Continue the public hearing to a specific date.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Recommended Finding for Approval
2. Proposed Amendment (Draft Ordinance)
3. Notice of Exemption
HAROLD PHELP
Assistant Planner
RO8ER G. POST
Planning Director
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
October 28, 1997
MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
ITE1II��JIE FILING
THE NOTICE OF OTCOMPLETION FOR THE MISCELION ACCEPTING THE WORK LANEOUS LLANEOUS ICURBS, ZING
GUTTERS,
SIDEWALKS, CROSS -GUTTERS, PAVEMENTS, AND PEDESTRIAN RAMPS
IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, SPECIFICATION NO. 97-1
PREPARED BY Din Daneshfar DEPARTMENT Engineering
EXPLANATION_
SEEATTACHMENT
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Stateent, The original contract was awarded for $221, 884. 00,
with. 2 add tional change orders ($38,000) for a grand total of
ontract cost was $259.080.88. Funds are
Ord- No. B49029 and Account^Nos. 109-509-
137, 301-509-k4Pot18 34 and 109-
$259,884. The fina
available from Purch
500-598-6137, 301-5
509 500 590 C131.
STAFF RECOMMENDATI
Adopt the Resolu
filing of the Noti
zigg the acceptan -e-- f work and the
e of Complet on.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below/
1. Resolution
2. Contract Final Balance
ac97-1
Resolution No. 9 7' 13 9
3. Notice of Completion
4. Location Map
A-200 (Rev. 8/801
as follows:
RESOLUTION NO. 9 7-13 9
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF '1HE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ACCEPTING AND
AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF THE NOTICE OF
COMPLETION FOR THE MISCELLANEOUS CURB,
GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CROSS -GUTTER, PAVEMENT,
AND PEDESTRIAN RAMP IMPROVEMENTS AT
VARIOUS LOCATIONS OF THE CITY
(Engineering Spec No. 97-1)
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City, California,
It appearing to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department that all work
required to be done by MJC Construction, for the miscellaneous curb, gutter, sidewalk, cross -
gutter, pavement, and pedestrian ramp improvements at various locations of the city,
Engineering Specification No. 97-1, has been completed, the City Council of National City
hereby accepts said work and authorizes the filing of a Notice of Completion and orders that
payment for said work be made in accordance with said contract.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 1997.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
EXPLANATION:
On May 6,1997, by Resolution No. 97-55, the City Council awarded a
contract in the amount of $221,884.00 to MJC Construction, the
lowest bidder, for the Miscellaneous Concrete Curbs, Gutters,
Sidewalks, Cross -Gutters, Pavements, and Pedestrian Ramps
Improvements at Various Locations. The locations of the three
major construction sites (location map is attached) are listed
below:
1. 20th Street east of National City Boulevard.
2. "B" Avenue from 20th to 22th Streets.
3. Prospect Avenue from 16th to 18th Streets.
At the meeting of July 15, 1997, the City Council authorized the
addition of approximately $8,000.00 (Change Order No. 1) to the
initial contract amount for the construction of sidewalks on Hoover
Avenue along the northerly side of Paradise Creek (Educational
Park)
On September 9, 1997, by Resolution No. 97-116, the City Council
authorized Change Order No. 2 for $30,000.00 per the original
contract unit prices for additional concrete improvements
throughout the City due to the availability of the funds in the
project accounts.
On October 10, 1997, the final walk-through inspection was
conducted and the completed work was found to be in accordance with
the approved plans and specifications at a final cost of
$259,080.88 which was $803.12 less than the combined total of the
initial contract, plus Change Orders No. 1 and 2 ($259,884.00).
Therefore, It is recommended that the project be accepted, and the
Notice of Completion be filed.
Contract Final Balance
Specification No. : 97-1
Project: Misc. Curbs, Gutters, Sidewalks, X-Gutters,
Pavements, pedestrian ramps Improvements
To: (Contractor) MJC Construction
You are hereby requested to comply with the
specifications.
Page 1
Date:10/14/97
Project No. : 6134 & 6137
Final Inspection Date:10/10/97
Completion Date: 10/28/97
following changes from the contract plans and
Item
No.
Item Description
Unit
Unit
Price
$
Original
Contract
Increase( + )
Decrease( - )
Total To Date
Qua'ty
Am't.$
Qua'ty.
Amt.$
Qua'ty.
Am't.$
1
Sidewalk Removal & Replacement
per G-7 or walkways to meet
ADA requirements
SF
$3.75
13,500
$50,625.00
+6621
$24,828.75
20,121.00
$75,453.75
2
New 4" Conc. Sidewalk per G-7
SF
$2.55
13,200
$33,660.00
-1985
($5,061.75)
11,215.00
$28,598.25
3
Ped Ramps per G-28 Type A-1
SF
$648.00
88
$57,024.00
-7
($4,536.00)
81.00
$52,488.00
4
Ped Ramps per G-29
EA
$648.00
20
$12,960.00
-2
($1,296.00)
18.00
$11,664.00
5
Ped Ramps per G-31 or modified
(with Curb or Gravity Wall on PL)
and ADA requirements
EA
$350.00
29
$10,150.00
+2
$700.00
31.00
$10,850.00
6
6" or 8" Type Curb and Gutter
G-2, Removal & Replacement
LF
$15.50
900
$13,950.00
+461
$7,145.50
1,361.00
$21,095.50
7
6"-8" Type Curb and Gutter (G-1)
LF
8
300
$2,400.00
+116
$928.00
416
$3,328.00
8
Concrete Driveways and Driveway
Ramps per G-14A
SF
$5.00
4,000
$20,000.00
+2327
$11,632.50
6,326.50
$31,632.50
9
3" or 4" and variable Thickness
Asphalt Concrete
TON
$52.50
60
$3,150.00
-28
($1,495.73)
31.50
$1,654.28
10
8" or 10" Crushed Misc. Base
TON
$60.00
1,800
$1,800.00
-4
($210.00)
26.50
$1,590.00
11
Alley Aprons per G-17
SF
$5.90
1,350
$7,965.00
+224
$1,321.60
1,574.00
$9,286.60
12
Chain Link Fence (4 ft) per M-6
LF
$20.00
170
$3,400.00
-70
($1,400.00)
100.00
$2,000.00
13
Chain Link Gate(Double Swing)
E4
600
1
$600.00
-1
($600.00)
0
0
14
Steel Fixed Bollards With White
EA
$2,000.00
4
$800.00
-1
($200.00)
3.00
$600.00
Paint
15
Grind Raised Concrete Slab
Joints
to smooth
LF
2
1700
53.400.00
-1030
($2.060.00)
670
51.340.00
TOTAL THIS PAGE
$221,884.00
$29,696.88
$251,580.88
CORDING REQUESTED IV
*WV RECORDED NAIL TO
" CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
STRUT
ARORriS 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
NATIONAL CITY, CA. 91950
RAT! AI VT
above Ms Yee for recorder's use)
NOTICE OF COMPLETION
CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 3093
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the completion on OCTOBER 28, , 1997 , of the
MISCELLANEOUS CURBS, GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, CROSS -GUTTERS, PAVEMENT AND PEDESTRIANRAMPS
Work of improvement or portion of work of improvement under construction or alteration. IMPROVEMENTS
(AT 20th STREET EAST OF NC BLVD, AND
on the premises located at VARIOUS LOCATION IN NATIONAL CITY "B" AVE. FROM 20th ID 22nd STREET)
Street Address City State Zip Code
The undersigned owns the following interest or estate in said property: N/A
Nature of the interest or estate of owner (mortgagor, lessee, etc.)
Said work of improvement was performed on the property pursuant to a contract with
MJC CONSTRUCTION
Name of Original Contractor
The following work and material were supplied: CARPENTER, CONCRETE LAYER, SCRAPER, LOADER
General statement of kind of labor, services, equipment or materials
TRUCKS, CONCRETE, ASPHALT AND BASE MATERIALS.
The names and addresses of co -owners are: N/A
Joint tentants, tenants in common, or other owners
Dated: , 19
Signature of Owner
City of National City, 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950
I, the undersigned, say: I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents
thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing
is true and correct.
Executed on , 19 , at , California.
Signature:
GEORGE H. WATERS, MAYOR
• City of National City, California
MEETING DATE
A RESOLUTION U.E.' '1'HN C1'1'Y WUNLJL Ur' NATIONAL CITY AUTHURIGINCiN
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
October 28, 1997
AGENDA ITEM NO. 3
TM TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO FOR THE
FUNDING OF THE FEDERALLY MANDATED STORM WATER PERMIT AND TOXIC CLEAN-UP
PROGRAM FEES (1997-1998)
PREPARED BY Din Daneshfar
DEPARTMEN
Engineering
EXPLANATION.
This is an agreement with the City of San Diego, as a principal permittee,
to pay the City's share of the annual storm water permit fee in the amount
of $361.37 and the toxic clean-up fee in the amount of $722.73 (fee
distribution tables are attached) in compliance with Order No. 90-42, and
the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA
0108758.
Environmental Review
N/A
nadrsciol Stat emgcWle from the NPDES stormwater permit (Account No. 001-421-
000-660-7056).
STAFF • MMENDATI • %�I
Adopt the Reso ution a*! izing the
the City of San Diego, as Principa
federally mandated annual storm watt
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
int No. -
:ii.._' Col- ° ,
Mayor to enter into an agreement with
Permittee, for the funding of the
r permit and the toxic clean-up fees.
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 97-140
1. Resolution
2. Agreement
3 Estimated Monitoring Cost Schedule
A.1lj'�tev. 9/BO)
RESOLUTION NO. 9 7- 140
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO FOR THE
FUNDING OF THE FEDERALLY MANDATED
STORM WATER PERMIT AND TOXIC
CLEAN-UP PROGRAM FEES (1997-98)
WHEREAS, the San Diego County co-permittees named in California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, Order No. 90-42 (NPDES Permit No. Ca
0108758) are obligated to jointly pay an annual permit fee of $10,000 and a Bay Protection and
Toxic Cleanup Program annual fee of $20,000 for calendar year 1998; and
WHEREAS, it is agreed by all San Diego County co-permittees of Board Order
90-42, as extended pursuant to Section 2235.2, Title 23 of the California Code of Regulations
that co-permittees will reimburse City of San Diego for their individual shares of the above -
mentioned $30,000 in fees when invoiced by the City of San Diego.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
National City that the Mayor is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with the City of
San Diego for funding of the federally mandated Storm Water Permit and Toxic Clean-up
Program fees (1997-98). Said agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 1997.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
1,J Ls'
Georg
e H. Esser, III
City Attorney
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
SAN DIEGO COUNTY CO-PERMITTEE ANNUAL FEE AGREEMENT
CALENDAR YEAR 1988
WHEREAS, the San Diego County co-permittees named in California Regional Water
Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, Order No. 90-42 (NPDES Permit No. Ca
0108758) are obligated to jointly pay an annual permit fee of $10,000.00 and a Bay
Protection and Toxic Cleanup Program annual fee of $20,000.00 for calendar year
1998, and
WHEREAS, the City of San Diego, as Principal Permittee, will initially fund and pay the
above -mentioned $30,000.00 in fees, and
WHEREAS, a new Stormwater Waste Discharge Permit and Memorandum of
Understanding covering San Diego County Co-permittees stormwater discharges for
the period of 1995-2000 will not be approved until January 1998 or later.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by all San Diego County co-permittees of Board
Order 90-42, as extended pursuant to Section 2235.2, Title 23 of the California Code of
Regulations as follows:
Co-permittees will reimburse City of San Diego for their individual shares of the above -
mentioned $30,000.00 in fees when invoiced by City of San Diego in proportions
determined as follows and further enumerated in the attached chart:
One-half (50%) divided equally between the 20 co-permittees and the remaining one-
half (50%) divided among the co-permittees, excluding the San Diego Unified Port
District, in proportion to the 1997 SANDAG "household" population figures.
Accepted this day of , 1997
Authorized Representative
Title
Municipality:
1998 ANNUAL STORMWATER PERMIT FEE ESTIMATED SHARE BY JURISDICTION
(50% POPULATION/50% ADMINISTRATIVE SPLIT)
JURISDICTION
CARLSBAD
CHULA VISTA
CORONADO
DEL MAR
EL CAJON
ENCINITAS
ESCONDIDO
IMPERIAL BEACH
LA MESA
LEMON GROVE
NATIONAL CITY
OCEANSIDE
POWAY
SAN DIEGO
SAN MARCOS
SANTEE
SOLANA BEACH
VISTA
COUNTY"'
PORT DISTRICT
TOTALS
PROPORTIONS
POPULATION
70,089
156,148
29,229
5,147
92,638
57,574
119,916
28,007
56,851
24,762
A 56,408
149,220
46,008
1,197,077
48,982
55,304
13,677
81,013
244,469
0
B 2,532,519
% OF TOTAL
POPULATION
2.7676%
6.1657%
1.1541%
0.2032%
3.6579%
2.2734%
4.7350%
1.1059%
2.2448%
0.9778%
C 2.2273%
5.8922%
1.8167%
47.2682%
1.9341%
2.1838%
0.5401%
3.1985,
9.6532%
0.0000%
100.0000%
% OF TOTAL
POPULATION
FEE
1.3838%
3.0829%
0.5771 %
0.1016%
1.8290%
1.1367%
2.3675%
0.5529%
1.1224%
0.4889%
D 1.1137%
2.9461%
0.9083%
23.6341
0.9671%
1.0919%
0.2700%
1.5995%
4.8266%
0.0000%
50.0000%
50.0000%
OF TOTAL
ADMINISTRATIVE
FEE "
' 1997 SANDAG FIGURES
▪ ONE-HALF OF ADMINISTRATIVE FEE I )IVIDED EQUALLY AMONG 20 CO-PERMITTEES
POPULATION WITHIN COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO URBAN LIMIT LINES
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
E 2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
50.0000%
50.0000%
% OF TOTAL
FEE
ESTIMATED
FEE
$10,000
3.8838%
5.5829%
3.0771 %
2.6016%
4.3290%
3.6367%
4.8675%
3.0529%
3.6224%
2.9889%
F 3.6137%
5.4461%
3.4083%
26.1341%
3.4671 %
3.5919%
2.7700%
4.0995%
7.3266%
2.5000%
100.0000%
$388.38
$558.29
$307.71
$260.16
$432.90
$363.67
$486.75
$305.29
$362.24
$298.89
G $361.37
$544.61
$340.83
$2,613.41
$346.71
$359.19
$277.00
$409.95
$732.66
$250.00
$10,000.00
Calculations; A/B = C
C*50%=D
D + E = F
F * H = G
DEPOSIT
$0.00
AMOUNT
DUE
$388.38
$558.29
$307.71
$260.16
$432.90
$363.67
$486.75
$305.29
$362.24
$298.89
$361.37
$544.61
$340.83
$2,613.41
$346.71
$359.19
$277.00
$409.95
$732.66
$250.00
$10,000.00
JURISDICTION
CARLSBAD
CHULA VISTA
CORONADO
DEL MAR
EL CAJON
ENCINITAS
ESCONDIDO
IMPERIAL BEACH
LA MESA
LEMON GROVE
NATIONAL CITY
OCEANSIDE
POWAY
SAN DIEGO
SAN MARCOS
SANTEE
SOLANA BEACH
VISTA
COUNTY*"
PORT DISTRICT
TOTALS
PROPORTIONS
1998 TOXIC HOT SPOT FEE ESTIMATED SHARE BY JURISDICTION
(50% POPULATION/50% ADMINISTRATIVE SPLIT)
POPULA [ION
70,089
156,148
29,229
5,147
92,638
57,574
119,916
2E1,007
56,851
24,762
A 56,408
149,220
46,008
1,197,077
48,982
55,304
13,677
81,013
244,469
0
B 2,532,519
OF TOTAL
POPULATION
2.7676%
6.1657%
1.1541%
0.2032%
3.6579%
2.2734%
4.7350%
1.1059%
2.2448%
0.9778%
C 2.2273%
5.8922%
1.8167%
47.2682%
1.9341%
2.1838%
0.5401%
3.1989%
9.6532%
0.0000%
100.0000%
% OF TOTAL
POPULATION
FEE
1.3838%
3.0829%
0.5771%
0.1016%
1.8290%
1.1367%
2.3675%
0.5529%
1.1224 Y.
0.4889 Y.
D 1.1137 Yo
2.9461 '/o
0.9083 Yo
23.6341 7o
0.9671 Yo
1.0919 Vo
0.2700 0
1.5995 V.
4.8266
0.0000 Y.
50.0000 V.
50.0000%
OF TOTAL
ADMINISTRATIVE
FEE "
1997 SANDAG FIGURES
" ONE-HALF OF ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DIVIDED EQUALLY AMONG 20 CO-PERMITTEES
"' POPULATION WITHIN COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO URBAN LIMIT LINES
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
E 2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
2.5000%
50.0000%
50.0000%
% OF TOTAL
FEE
3.8838%
5.5829%
3.0771 %
2.6016%
4.3290%
3.6367%
4.8675%
3.0529%
3.6224%
2.9889%
F 3.6137%
5.4461%
3.4083%
26.1341%
3.4671%
3.5919%
2.7700%
4.0995%
7.3266%
2.5000%
100.0000%
ESTIMATED
FEE
$20,000
$776.76
$1,116.57
$615.41
$520.32
$865.79
$727.34
$973.50
$610.59
$724.48
$597.78
G $722.73
$1,089.22
$681.67
$5,226.82
$693.41
$718.38
$554.01
$819.89
$1,465.32
$500.00
$20,000.00
AMOUNT
DEPOSIT ? DUE
Calculations: A/B=C
C * 50% = D
D + E = F
F * H = G
$776.76
$1,116.57
$615.41
$520.32
$865.79
$727.34
$973.50
$610.59
$724.48
$597.78
$722.73
$1,089.22
$681.67
$5,226.62
$693.41 ;;
$718.38
$554.01
$819.89
$1,465,32 I'
$500.00 I
$20,000.00
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
October 28, 1997 5
MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO.
M�Ynu �bL RESULUTIUN OF THE Ull'Y UUUNC:JJJ Vt NAllUNAU Cl'1'Y AU1t1UK.LJNh lri�
t�4 NTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, A PRINCIPAL
PERMITTEE, TO PAY THE CITY'S SHARE FOR THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) EDUCATION EFFORT.
PREPARED BY Din Daneshfar DEPARTMENT Engineering
EXPLANATION
In compliance with the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA 0108758, the City of National City
has implemented its best management practices to educate the public about
the stormdrain water pollution facts.
The San Diego County co-permittees named in California Regional .Water
Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, Order No. 90-42 (NPDES Permit No.
Ca 0108758) have agreed to jointly pay for 12 issues, 1 page educational
advertisements with San Diego Magazine for a total cost of $37,200.00. A
copy of the advertisement sample is attached. The National City's share of
the costs for the advertisements is calculated to be $161.10 (see the
attached cost schedule).
X
Environmental Review N/A
Financ�c�l 5�at�me Funds are available from the NPDES stormwater management
fFt w c z n ccount No. 001-421-000-660-7056).
TAFF RECOMMENDATI
Adopt the Resolution
the City of San Diego,
g the Ma
Principal Per
issues, 1 page educational advertisemen
part of the City's NPDES education effort.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
Acco
•
r to enter into an agreement with
ittee, for the funding of the 12
s with the San Diego Magazine as a
97-142
AT�CHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. Resolution 4. A sample of 1 sheet advertisements
2. Agreement
3. Estimated Cost Schedules
adl
A-200 (Rev. 9/8O)
RESOLUTION NO. 97-142
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT
WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, A PRINCIPAL
PERMITTEE, TO PAY THE CITY'S SHARE FOR THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION
SYSTEM (NPDES) EDUCATION EFFORT
WHEREAS, in compliance with the provisions of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Permit No. CA 0108758, the City of National City has
implemented its best management practices to educate the public about the stormdrain water
pollution facts; and
WHEREAS, the San Diego County co-permittees named in California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, Order No. 90-42 (NPDES Permit No. Ca
0108758) have agreed to jointly pay for twelve (12) issues, one (1) page educational
advertisements with San Diego Magazine for a total cost of $37,200; and
WHEREAS, National City's share of the costs for the advertisement is calculated
to be $161.10.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
National City that the Mayor is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with the City of
San Diego, a principal permittee, to pay National City's share for the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) educational effort. Said agreement is on file in the
office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 1997.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
dJ'31C.
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
SAN DIEGO COUNTY CO-PERMITTEE SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE AGREEMENT
CALENDAR YEAR 1997-98
WHEREAS, the San Diego County co-permittees named in California Regional Water
Quality Control Board, San Diego Region, Order No. 90-42 (NPDES Permit No.
Ca 0108758) have agreed to jointly pay for 12 1-page educational advertisements with
San Diego Magazine for a total cost of $37,200.
NOW THEREFORE it is agreed by all San Diego County co-permittees of Board Order
90-42, as extended pursuant to Section 2235.2, Title 23 of the California Code of
Regulations as follows:
Co-permittees individual shares of the abovementioned $37,200 in costs when invoiced
by City of San Diego based on the paid circulation of San Diego Magazine per zip code
within each municipality and further enumerated in the attached chart:
Accepted this — day of , 1997
Authorized Representative Municipality Name
Title
Municipality
Chula Vista
Imperial Beach
La Mesa
Lemon Grove
National City
Carlsbad
De_ I Mar
El Cajon
Encinitas
Escondido
Oceanside
Poway
San Marcos
Santee
Solana Beach
Vista
Sari Diego
County
Coronado
Port District
SAN DIEGO MAGAZINE ADVERTISEMENTS
WITH PORT DISTRICT PAYING 5% OF THE COST
Paid Circulation
1329
159
1283
204
A 171
(,05
P04
1!;30
974
1404
1272
725
531
425
556
762
20117
3977
852
B 37280
REPRINTS PER -1 I-IOUSAND`
1 page $54.40
2 page $71.80
4 page $123.52
` Based on a minimum total of 30,000
Percent of
Total
0.035649142
0.004265021
0.034415236
0.005472103
C 0.00458691
0.016228541
0.01083691
0.041040773
0.026126609
0.037660944
0.034120172
0.019447425
0.014243562
0.011400215
0.014914163
0.020439914
0.539619099
0.106679185
0.022854077
0.05
1 page spread
for 12 issues
D $35,340.00
$1,259.84
$150.73
$1,216.23
$193.38
E $162.10
$573.52
$382.98
$1,450.38
$923.31
$1,330.94
$1,205.81
$687.27
$503.37
$402.88.
$527.07
$722.35
$19,070.14
$3,770.04
$807.66
$1,860.00
$37,200.00
Deposit
Calculations: A/B = C
C*D=E
Balance
$1,259.84
$150.73
$1,216.23
$193.38
E $162.10
$573.52
$382.98
$1,450.38
$923.31
$1,330.94
$1,205.81
$687.27
$503.37
$402.88
$527.07
$722.35
$19,070.14
$3,770.04
$807.66
$1,860.00
$37,200.00
linsimming :•f"
"1-,W5rnitXtc
t`,4
"'AC '
; :
a4,! '"""
,
- ;4s
c14,117._
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
6
MEETING DATE OCT . 2 8 ,19 9 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. \
r ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #17
PREPARED BY TESS E. LIMFUECO
EXPLANATION
DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPT.
RATIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER #17
PER GOVERNMENT SECTION CODE 32708.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
I RECOMMEND RATIFICATION OF THESE WARRANTS FOR A TOTAL
OF $204,606.�54
BOARD/COMMISSION E MMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. WARRANT REGISTER #17
2. WORKER'S COMP WARRANT REGISTER DATED 10/21/97
Resolution No
A-200 (Rev. 9/801
City of National City
Department of Finance
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950-4397
(619) 336-4267
TO: THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCILMEMBERS
FROM: MARIA L. MATIENZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF WARRANTS AND/OR PAYROLL
REGISTER NO. 17
GENERAL FUND
TECHNOLOGY FUND
LIBRARY FUND
PARKS MAINTENANCE FUN
GRANT -CA LITERACY CAM
RETIREMENT FUND
P.O.S.T. FUND
LOWER SWEETWATER FUND
SEWER SERVICE FUND
TINY TOT CLASSES FUND
GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM
GRANT -COPS UNIVERSAL
STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY
REGISTER TOTALS
PAYROLL
TOTAL
87,708.56
3,614.62
1,642.61
2,600.88
173.31
3,718.23
1,890.12
282.02
6,983.36
364.09
441.76
2,732.01
8.67
PHOTO -RADAR FUND 43.76
GRANT -NC SUPPR. OF DR 352.77
LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRI 13.27
PLAZA BONITA BONDS 1,000.00
GRANT-C.D.B.G. 776.13
CDC PAYMENTS 741.58
TDA 36,864.36
FACILITIES MAINT FUND 1,577.38
LIABILITY INS. FUND 10,246.81
GENERAL SERVICES FUND 2,381.65
INFORMATION SERVICES 13,182.52
MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUN 1,214.62
TRUST & AGENCY 1,028.92
181,584.01
0.00
181,584.01
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS AS LISTED ABOVE AND COVERED BY:
WARRANT NUMBERS 145864 THROUGH 145948 INCLUSIVE
EXCEPTING NONE /103248 THROUGH 103317 INCLUSIVE
ARE CORRECT AND JUST TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND CONFORM TO THE
BUDGET FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THAT MONEY IS AVAILABLE IN
THE PROPER FUNDS TO PAY SAID DEMANDS.
MARIA L. MATIENZO, FINANCE DI
TOR
--b Recycled Paper
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE October 28, 1997
7
AGENDA ITEM NO
! ITEM TITLE
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Evelyn N. Woodsum
PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla pfPARTMENT City Clerk
EXPLANATION.
The claim of Evelyn N. Woodsum arises from an occurrence from July - September, 1997
and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on September 24, 1997.
XX
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Deny the claim and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
T CHMENT (Listed Below) Resolution No
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE October 28, 1997 AGENDA ITEM NO 8
l ITEM TITLE
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION.
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Ashley and Elizabeth Balough
Michael R. Dalla
DEPARTMENT
City Clerk
The claim of Ashley and Elizabeth Balough arises from an occurrence on March 22,
1997, and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on September 17, 1997.
Environmental ReviewXX
N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Deny the claim and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATWHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
N/A
A-200 (Rev. 9/B0)
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE October 28, 1997
9
AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION.
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Robert Hightower and Margie Kirk
Michael R. Dalla
PARTMENT City Clerk
The claim of Robert Hightower and Margie Kirk arises from an occurrence on May 2-5,
1997, and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on September 17, 1997.
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Deny the claim and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
N/A
A-200 (Rev. 9J801
s
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE October 28, 1997 AGENDA ITEM NO. to
ITEM TITLE
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION.
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Nationwide Ins. for Ann and James Arnold
Michael R. Dalla
DEPARTMENT City Clerk
The claim of Nationwide Insurance for Ann and James Arnold arises from an occurrence
on February 10, 1997, and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on September 18, 1997.
Environmental ReviewXX
N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Deny the claim and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
N/
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
October 28, 1997
MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 11
RJ PUK'1 UN IHh U1V lih hHbl b1L
CX AVENUE BETWEEN MELROSE AND FIRST STREETS, A.P.N. 554-242-17
PREPARED BY CAMERON BERKUTI
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
EXPLANATION.
The purpose of this report is to provide background information and status
of the City -owned real property on the east side of Clairmont Avenue
between Melrose Street and First Street. The property is approximately 165
ft. by 120 ft. (19,800 S.F.) zone as RS-2, and it can be subdivided into 3
lots.
Previously, The City Council expressed unwillingness to sell this parcel
until the potential of the existing water well on this parcel is explored
by the Sweetwater Authority.
On May 19, 1992 by Resolution No. 92-85, the City Council accepted the
Community Development Commissions offer to purchase ten(10) City -owned
properties and excluded this property from the offer due to the existance
of a water well and neighborhood opposition.
Presently, the parcel is on hold, and it is not available for sale.
Environmental Review N/A
Nfknancial Statement
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Direction trom the City ounci on wheth r to hold this piece of property
or to authorize the City Engineer to roceed with the selling of the
property in accordance with City Counci Policy No. 901 (attached).
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
1. Plat
2 Copy of City Council Policy 901 - Sale of Surplus Real Property.
17
A-200 (Rev. 9/801
64,
tLANOITAN
MELROSE
41 ..
185
16
DIVISION STREET
' 184
20
183
19
182
181
180
JD ID
O
179
.e ao p.o
13 12 it
n1
18 ; 17 'q 16 1, 15
o
178
STREET
7
47
moo
48
49
50
51
52
53
lak
O
13
12
11
10
O9
I CO
59
58
57
56
55 ''
r
54 '
0—FIRST
STREET
1
t;
s
.a
Q
79
•'
®
80
®
81
®
82
®
83
v' /�
64
O7t'
' �s
: 85 .E
244
CLAIRMONT
r
O•
14
4268
11 166
OSEC 105
13
N 13
12
11
554 -24
CHANGES-.
EiLK YF4co
OLD
tEW
"WHILE THIS PLAT IS BELIEVED
TO BE CORRECT, THIS COMPANY
ASSUMES NO LIABEILITY FOR ANY
LOSS ACCURING BY REASON OF
RELIANCE THEREON."
CD
I.1r. ((hill!.
MAP 4268 - NATIONAL AWARD HOMES UNIT NO I
MAP 166 - RANCHO CIF 1 A 1JArinrl _ nnp " 111., nnt- Ins
CITY COUNCIL POLICY
TITLE:
SALE OF SURPLUS REAL PROPERTY
ADOPTED : JUNE 19, 1984 AMENDED OR REVISED: August 14, 1990
POLICY
NUMBEP.9o1
Purpose
To establish a policy and procedure for the sale of surplus property and
use of the proceeds from that sale.
Policy
The following steps are to be followed to sale City -owned pieces of
property:
1. Obtain other City Departments' cents for the sale of the property.
2. Secure preliminary title reports for the property.
3. Prepare plats and legal descriptions for the property.
4. Request the City Council (Real Estate Committee) to cc -lore the
property surplus and direct the staff to sell it.
5. If applicable, semi a written offer to sell or lease the property to
the other government agencies (Government Code Section 54222).
6. Order a letter of appraisal for the property from a licensed
appraiser.
7. Order CLTA title insurance policy for the property to be sold..
8. Prepare the advertising and bid packages for the marketable
properties, and request the City Council's approval to proceed with
the advertisement of the marketable properties.
9. Advertise the sale of marketable properties.
10. Prepare a final report to the. City Council providing information on
the results of the bid opening or the negotiations.
11. Obtain approval from the City Council to enter into an escrow to sell
the property. Unless otherwise specified in the offer, or in the bid
package, the City will open a normal escrow where the City will pay
for the cost of the title insurance, and one-half of the escrow fee.
The proceeds from the sale will be spent on beautification or improvement
projects throughout the City.
Related Policy Refer
None
•
•
•
•
City of National City
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE
October 28, 1997 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12
(-ITEM TITLE
U UI- LUMMUNITY BUILDING BY W TWATER HIGH'S MARINE CORPS JUNIOR RESERVE
OFFICERS TRAINING CORPTIC T FOR AN AWARD CEREMONY ON DECEMBER 12, 1998
AND WAIVER OF FEES
PREPARED BYf. McAvoy /! P PARTMENT Public Works
EXPLANATION.
The Marine Corps Junior R.O.T.C. is b(ng recognized as the number one unit in a special award
ceremony being held on Friday December 12, 1997. Approximately 400 will be in attendance.
The fees are: Hall
$175.26
Custodial 106.12
Total: $282.01
Waiver of fees is requested by the MCJROTC per the attached letter.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
Loss of $282.01 to the General Fund if fees are waived.
Account No. N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Council decision on waiver of fees is requested.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
Marine Corps Junior Reserve Officers Training Corps letter of 8 October 1997
A-200 (Rev. 9/801
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
October 28, 1997
MEETING DATE
(-ITEktuRTM
4
AGENDA ITEM NO.
A RESULUllUN OF TR.E NATTE,Nftl, CITY
IZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO FOR FUNDING OF THE FEDERALLY MANDATED STORM WATER
MONITORING PROGRAM (1997-98)
PREPARED BY Din Daneshfar Engineering
DEPARTMENT
EXPLANATION -
In compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) Program, the City of National City is required to
monitor wet weather storm water run off as regulated by the Federal
Environmental Protection Agency. The San Diego County Co-
permittees have been using a jointly developed monitoring program
that is in compliance with the EPA regulations and is acceptable to
the California Regional Water Quality Board. This year, the total
cost of the monitoring program is proposed to be $392,220.00 (not
to exceed). The City of National City's share of this cost is
$9,600.16 (see the attached Cost Schedule). Those agencies that do
not want to participate in the joint monitoring program may end up
paying substantially more for the stormwater monitoring
requirements.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial.taere�� The funds for the monitoring program will be
piuvl C ( Storm Water management fee collection, Account No.
001-421-000-660-7056.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Reso ut `aufhorizing
agreement with the ity of San Die
conducting a joint storm water mon
not -to -exceed cost of $9,600.16.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ii •
1
he May. to enter into an
o, as Principal Permittee, for
toring program for an estimated
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. Resolution
2. Agreement
3. Estimated Monitoring Cost Schedule
Resolution No 97-141
4. Detailed budget and scope of
work for storm water
monitoring by the consultant
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
u
RESOLUTION NO. 9 7 -141
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH
ME CITY OF SAN DIEGO FOR FUNDING OF THE
FEDERALLY MANDATED STORM WATER
MONITORING PROGRAM (1997-98)
WHEREAS, in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Program, the City of National City is required to monitor
wet weather storm water run off as required by the Federal Environmental Protection
Agency; and
WHEREAS, the San Diego County co-permittees have been using a jointly
developed monitoring program that is in compliance with the EPA regulations and is
acceptable to the California Regional Water Quality Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City
of National City that the Mayor is hereby authorized to enter into an agreement with the
City of San Diego for funding of the federally mandated Storm Water Monitoring
Program (1997-98). Said agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 1997.
George H. Waters, Mayor
A 1 lEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
3d:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
CO-PERMITTEE JOINT WET WEATHER MONITORING AGREEMENT
1997-98 STORM SEASON
WHEREAS, the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board,
through its Executive Director, has determined a wet weather
stormwater monitoring and testing program to be performed by the
San Diego County Stormwater permit co-permittees for the 1997-98
storm season, and
WHEREAS, the City of San Diego, as Principal Permitee, has
published a Request for Proposals, interviewed prospective
consultants, and, with the advice and consent of the other co-
permittees selected and negotiated a contract with Woodward -Clyde
Consultants to perform said wet weather stormwater monitoring, and
testing, and
WHEREAS, the consultant has developed a Scope of Work to satisfy
the requirements of the Regional Board's wet weather stormwater
monitoring and testing program, a copy of which is attached and
made a part of this agreement, and
WHEREAS, the consultant has agreed to perform the monitoring and
testing program pursuant to the approved Scope of Work for a cost
not to exceed $392,220, and
WHEREAS, Waste Discharge Permit No. 95-76, (including an
incorporated Memorandum of Understanding) regulating co-permittee's
stormwater discharges for the period 1995-2000 will not be approved
by the Regional Board until January, 1998 or later.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed by all the San Diego County co-
permittees of Waste Discharge Permit and Board Order 90-42, as
extended pursuant to Section 2235.2, Title 23 of the California
Code of Regulations as follows:
The division of costs for the wet weather monitoring program will
be based on the percentages shown in the attached table.
Each co-permittee's share of the wet weather monitoring costs
pursuant to the attached Scope of Work and cost breakdown is due
and payable upon acceptance and approval of this agreement. The
cost breakdown of any other work done by the consultant, Woodward -
Clyde Consultants, under a joint venture by two or more co-
permittees in satisfaction of any provision of the existing
or future permits will be determined by separate agreement up to
the $600,000 limit of the consultant's contract with the City of
San Diego. The City of San Diego will administer the contract with
the consultant at no cost to the co-permittees.
At the conclusion of the 1997-98 wet weather monitoring and testing
program and after the total cost of the program is calculated, any
monies collected and not expanded will be refunded to the co-
permittees or applied to the following year's program based on a
majority vote o: all co-permittees.
Accepted this 28th Day of October 1997.
Authorized kepresentative
Title:
Municipality:
JURISDICTION
CARLSBAD
CIIULA VISTA
CORONADO
DEL MAR
EL CAJON
ENCINITAS
ESCONDIDO
IMPERIAL BEACH
LA MESA LEMON GROVE
NATIONAL CITY
OCEANSIDE
POWAY
SAN DIEGO
SAN MARCOS
SANTEE
SOLANA BEACH
VISTA
(COUNTY -
PORT DISTRICT-6'
TOTALS
PROPORTIONS
(1)
% OF TOTAL
POPULATION POPULATION
70,089 2.7676%
156,14E 6.1657%
29,229 _ 1 1541%
5,147 02032%
92.638 3.6579%
57.574 2 2734%
119,916 4.7350%
28,007 1.1059%
56.851 2.2448%
24.762 0.9778%
A 56.408 C 2.2273%
149.220 5.8922%
46.00E 1.8167%
1,197,077 47.2682%
48,982 1.9341%
55,304 2.1838%
13,677 0.5401%
81,013 3.1989%
244,469 9.6532%
0 0.0000%
2,532 519 100.0000%
WET WEATHER TESTING ESTIMATED SHARE BY JURISDICTION
/ 44O0/. POPULATION/40Y. ID ELOPED LAND AREA/20 ADMINISTRATIVE SPLIT)
% OF TOTAL l f % OF TOTAL \ Y. O/F TOTAL ESTIMATED
POPULATION LAND AREA % OF TOTAL LAND AREA ADMINISTRATIVE FEE
FEE (ACRES(' LAND AREA FEE FEE .. _ _5392,220.
$4,341.97
59.673.27
$1,810.72
$318.85
55 738.87
$3,566.67
57,428.72
51.735.02
$3.521.68
_$1,533.99
D 53.494.44
59,244.09
$2.850.17
$74,158. 19
53 034.40
53.426.05
5847.28
$5.016.71
515,144 70
$0.00
E"5156.88800
$156,888 00
9,733
13.444
1.812
858
8.155
6,842
12.957
1.757
5,133
2,235
F 4.060
14,745
8,835
99,799
6,616
4,915
2,077
9,562
----41,946
0
-i 255,481
PRIOR AMOUNT
YEAR INVOICED ❑EPOSIF
DEPOSITS
3.8097% 55.976.93 53,612.55 $13,931.45 53,789.12 $10,142.33
5.2622°/. 58.255 81 53.612.55 521,541.63 56,347.72 515,193.91
0 7093Y $1,112.73 53 612.55 56 536.00 51,487.00 55.049.00
0 3356% 5526.89 $3.612.55 ' 44.458.29 5794.22 53.664.07
3 1920 G 55,007.89 $3.612.55 $14 359 31 54 039.37 510,319.94
26781% $4,201.60 53612.55 51138082 53024.35 50,356.47
5.0716% $7.956.75 53612.55 5113998.02 _ 55.482.66 $13.515.36
0.6877% $1.078.95 53,612.55 $6,426.52 51,462.32 54,964.20
2.0092% $3,152.12 $3.612.55 510.286.55 $2,707.13 _ 57,579.42
0.8748% 51,372.49 _ _ 53,612.55 _ _$6.519.03 $1,477.19 55.041.85
H 1.5892% I $2,493.20 K 53,612.55 -N.59.600.19 $2,471.92 57,128 28
57715% $9,054.74 $3612.55 $21.911.38 $6.447.90 515.463.47
_._. .. __ .. .__._.._ .__. .__. __.._
3.4582% 55,42547 53.612.55 511,888.19 53,120.67 58,767.52
390632% 561,285A4 53,612.55 5139,056.1E 50.00 5139,056.16
2.51396% 54,062.81 53,612.55 510,709.77 52,782.46 57,927.31
1-9238% 53.01E3.25 $3.612.55 $10,056.85 52.618.49 57.43836
0B130% $1,275.46 53,612.55 55,735.30 $1.200.90 $4.534.40
3.7427% 55,871.92 $3,612,55 $14 503.17 54,022.56 510.480,61
16.4184% 525,758.57 _ $3.612.55 544.515.82 $13 387.98 $31,127.84
0.0000% $0.00 S9.805.50 59 805.50 52 857.84 56,947.66
100.0000% J5156,888.00 11-$78,444.00 U 5392,220.00 $69.521.79 5322,698.21
5156,888.00 $78,444,00
1307 SANDAG FIGURES. LAND USES OMITTED FROM THE TOTAL LAND AREA FOR EACH AGENCY ARE AS FOLLOWS:
I. OPEN SPACE AND PARKS
2. AGRICULTURE
3. VACANT AND UNDEVELOPED LAND
4, FREEWAYS
5. SURFACE WATER BODIES
ADMINISTRATIVE FEE DIVIDED EQUALLY AMONG IB CO.PERMITTEES
"' POPULATION WITHIN COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO URBAN LIMIT LINES
"' SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT SHARE IS 17415T11 OF THE TOTAL SHARED COST
AMOUNT
DUE
$10,142.33
515.193.91
55.049 00
$3.664 07
S1D,31994
$8.356 47
S13.515 36
54.964 20
57,579
55,041.6425
57.128 28
515,4637 47
58,767 52
5139 056. 18
57.927 31
57.438 36
54,534.40
S 10.480.61
S31,121.64 I.
$6,94 7.66
SO 00 I 5322698 21
SEE ATTACHMENT "A2t FOR THE CALCULATIONS
ATTACHMENT "A"
(CALCULATIONS)
The cost distribution formula is based on 40% population, 40%
developed land, and 20% administrative cost.
(1) Ratios of (%) of total population:
C = A/B = 56,408/2,532,519 = 2.2273% (for National City)
(2) % of total population fee:
D = C * E = 2.2273% * $156,888 = $3,494.44
(3) Ratios of (%) of total developed land area:
H = F/G = 4,060/255,481 = 1.5892%
(4) % of total land area fee:
I = H * J = 1.58925t * $156,888 = $2,493.20 Cost:
(5) % of total administrative fee based on 20% administrative
split:
M = 0.20 * 0 = 0.20 * $392,220 = $78,444
K (total administration fee, National City's share)
= (M-L)/19 = ($78,444 - $9,805)/19 = $3,612.55
Estimated total fee for City of National City:
N = D + I + K = $3,494.44 + $2,493.20 + $3,612.55
= $9,600.19
09/22/57 10:21 WOODWPRD-CLYCE ' 1 615 533 3071
NO.826 F207/211
Woodward -Clyde lit
Erg nnnnng S sciencee applmd'a tra ua1h a anyrror.merIt
September 22, 1997
Project No. 9553054F
Mr. Robert E. Cain
NPDES Program Administrator
Engineering Department
City of San Diego
1010 Second Avenue, Suite 500
San Diego, CA 92101
SUBJECT: DETAILED BUDGET AND SCOPE OF WORK FOR
STORMWATER MONITORING - 1997-98 WET SEASON
Dear Mr. Cain:
Woodward -Clyde (WC) is pleased to present our detailed budget estimate and scope of
work for the monitoring tasks of the City's stormwater management program. This
proposal presents a summary of our approach, assumptions, and cost breakdown (by labor
hours, subcontractor fees, and other direct costs) for the 1997-98 wet season. We are
pleased to inform you that we managed to complete our work on the 1996/97 wet season
some S90,000 under our estimated budget?
WATER QUALITY MONITORING
The current draft of the Wet Weather Monitoring and Reporting Program of the Regional
Water Quality Control Board's (RWQCB) Order No. 95-76 requires the City of San Diego
and Co-permittees to the City's permit to conduct wet weather monitoring at 12 municipal
stormwater sites in San Diego County. The monitoring program includes collection of
samples at each municipal station during three separate storm events each year. For the
upcoming wet weather season, the three events will consist of two early season events,
likely in the October -December 1997 time frame, and a third event to occur after February
1, 1998. Attachment C to the RWQCB Order identified 12 municipal locations, including
9 land use and 3 mass loading stations. In 1996/97, two of the stations were relocated due
to destruction of one station (SD 12 - Landis) due to Caltrans construction, and the
relocation of tidally -influenced station SD7 - Switzer. Currently, the land use stations
include 2 residential, 3 commercial, and 3 industrial stations. The mass loading stations
are located on Chollas, Tecolote. and Los Penasquitos Creeks and in the City's 54" storm
drain off Laurel Street.
Woodward -Clyde Cansutta • A suos1diary of Woodward -Clyde Group. Inc.
Sunroad Plaza 3. Suite 1000 • 1615 Murray Canyon Roaa - San Dieoo. California 921C8
619.294.9400 • Fax 619.293-7920
Woodward -Clyde
Mr. Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 2
EQUIPMENT SELECTION AND INSTALLATION
Under the direction of the WC monitoring coordinator, MGD Technologies, Inc. (MGD)
will supply, install, and calibrate flow monitoring equipment and automatic samplers. The
selected equipment will be capable of performing flow monitoring and water quality
sampling to meet all the requirements of the RWQCB Order. Each monitoring station will
include an automatic sampler linked to telemetry for remote operation and data transfer, a
configuration that reduces the labor effort required to perform flow measurements during
the rainfall event at each station. We will perform the monitoring in two parts: the initial
installation and sampling of the two early storm events followed by equipment removal,
reinstallation, and sampling of the late season event.
Each station will be equipped with a flow measuring device and a stormwater automatic
sampler. The equipment will be mounted in a safe location inside an equipment enclosure
located at the monitoring site. A telephone telemetry cable will be placed between the
nearest telephone drop connection and the flow monitoring device.
In the event of vandalism or other loss or damage to equipment, MGD will repair or
replace the equipment at no additional cost to the City.
DRY RUN WITH FIELD CREWS
Field crews will be sent to each monitoring location prior to the sampling event in order to
gain familiarity with the monitoring location and vicinity, and to identify the best routes
between the monitoring stations and the analytical laboratory. Equipment diagnostics will
be performed remotely as a check on station equipment and the telemetry Links. The
operation of stormwater samplers will be verified during the field visit.
PRE -STORM PREPARATION
Preparation for storm water sampling will include weather forecasting, storm selection,
mobilization strategies, diagnostic evaluation of the samplers, and determination of
appropriate automatic sampler settings. Proper coordination and management of these
tasks will set the stage for effective storm sampling.
C ,NANCY SAND1EGO‘PROPg79A DOC
29/22/57 10:22 WOODWRRD-CLYDE -? 1 619 E32 3071 N2.926 P004/011
Woodward -Clyde
Mr. Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 3
Weather forecasting will be an important aspect of stormwater collection. Weatherwatch
Services will provide professional weather forecasting for the project. The WC monitoring
coordinator will decide whether to mobilize and prepare for a sampling event based on the
probability of rainfall and the storm's expected rainfall amount, coverage, and duration.
The selected storm event for sampling should meet the following criteria:
• Minimum 0.1 inch of rainfall in the drainage area;
• Storm event preceded by at least 72 hours of dry weather (no storm events of 0.1
inch or greater); and
- Storm volume within 50% of the average storm volume and duration for the region.
WC has conducted statistical analyses to define the average storm event for the City of San
Diego. This information will be used to select appropriate storm events for sampling.
STORMWATER SAMPLING
WC will collect water quality samples using two methods, in accordance with the
requirements of the RWQCB Order. Manual grab samples will be collected by field
personnel, and flow -weighted composite samples will be collected using automatic
samplers.
Grab samples will be collected for the analysis of constituents that are likely to be lost in
the pumping process to collect automatic samples (e.g., oil and grease), or which may
become contaminated or altered by the pump tubing (e.g., bacteria). Grab samples will
also be necessary for obtaining certain field measurements (e.g., pH and temperature).
Field personnel will obtain instantaneous on -site measurements during each station visit
and will also perform manual grab sampling for constituents that have short holding times
or are highly volatile in nature.
The majority of storm sampling will be conducted using automatic samplers, because the
samplers can be triggered to initiate sampling when a storm begins, and because they can
obtain composite samples based on dynamic flow conditions. Projections of runoff volume
expected at each land use station can be calculated based on the predicted rainfall amount
and runoff coefficient corresponding to the land use and soil type within the catchment.
This projection may then be used to program the data logger and controller at each station
C \NANCYlSANO(EGO\PROP'Th) OCC
Woodward -Clyde
Mr. Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 4
to trigger the water quality sampler at proper times to enable collection of flow -weighted
composite samples. The goal is to use the automatic samplers in this manner to collect
adequate volumes of stormwater to analyze the parameters required by the RWQCB Order.
Transfer of the samples from the field to the laboratory will take place using proper chain -
of -custody procedures. The field samples will be taken to a centralized Location such as a
storage locker or the storm control post CO await Transfer to the laboratory. This
centralized location wilt be accessible to all field personnel as well as "the laboratory
courier. When a sufficient number of field samples has accumulated, a laboratory courier
will be notified for pickup. Sample custody and transfer procedures will be conducted
according to EPA -recommended procedures.
WATER AND SEDIMENT CHEMICAL ANALYSES
Ceimic Corporation (Ceimic) will perform laboratory analysis of all field water quality
samples. Chemical analyses to be performed on grab samples include general physical and
inorganic parameters (pH, oil & grease, specific conductance, temperature, and total
cyanide), and bacteriological parameters (fecal coliform, fecal srreptococci, and total
coliform). For composite samples, analyses will include general physical and inorganic
parameters (ammonia, Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand
(COD), dissolved phosphorous, tutrate & nitrite nitrogen, pH, total nitrogen, and total
Kjeldahi nitrogen (TKN), total suspended solids, and turbidity), acid/base/neutral
extractables, pesticides, total recoverable metals (Sb. As, Be, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Se, Ag,
Tl, Zn, and Hg), and other organics (total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPIH) and MBAS).
Sediments will be analyzed for grain size, metals (As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, Ag, Zn, and
Hg), and organics (TPH, polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) & pesticides, PCBs &
organochlorine pesticides, and total organic carbon).
AMBIENT WATER TOXICITY TESTING
MBC Applied Environmental Sciences (MEC) will conduct toxicity testing on water
samples provided by WC. The samples obtained from the Chollas Creek and Tecolote
Creek mass loading stations during three storrn events will be used for the toxicity testing.
Two tests will be conducted on samples from each station after each storm event, utilizing
protocols specified in Short -Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effuents
and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms, and Supplement to Short -Term Methods
C.INANC Y\SAN DIEGo\PROP97vg"D0C
09/22/57 10:02 WOODW6RD-CLYDE - 1 619 533 3071 NO.826 P026/011
Woodward -Clyde
Mr. Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 5
for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters ro Freshwater
Organisms. Tests will be conducted on the fathead minnow, Pimephales promeias,
following the Larval Survival and Growth Test Method 1000.0, and on the cladoceran,
Cercodaphnia dubia, following Survival and Reproduction Test Method 1002.0. While
both of these tests are 7-day chronic toxicity bioassays, the test organism mortality for each
test will be recorded daily such that acute toxicity can also be calculated from the same test
data.
SEDIMENT COLLECTION FOR BULK CHEMISTRY AND BIOASSAY TESTING
MBC will collect sediments for bulk chemistry and bioassay testing from Chollas Creek
and San Diego Bay. Sampling will be performed within the 2 week period before October
1 for pre -wet season sampling and within the 2 week period after April 30 for the post -wet
season sampling. Sediment sampling for Chollas Creek will consist of a sediment grab at
25 stations in Chollas Creek, as shown on Figure 1, Appendix C of RWQCB Order No.
95-76. The upper 1 to 2 inches of creek sediment in the 25 samples will be composited
into one sample for sediment chemistry analyses. The composited sample will be aliquoted
into appropriate containers provided by the chemistry laboratory, stored in a cooler and
transported to the laboratory by a courier.
Sediment sampling in San Diego Bay will be conducted at the mouth of Chollas Creek.
MBC will employ a 17-foot Boston whaler to collect the samples. The sampling matrix
will consist of sediment grabs at six stations as specified in the RWQCB Order. Aliquots
will be taken from the upper 1 to 2 inches of bay sediment at Stations IA. 1B, 2A, 2B,
3A, and 3B (as shown on Figure 2, Appendix C of RWQCB Order No. 95-76). and
composited by station. The portion of sample to be used for chemical analysis will be
transferred into the appropriate sample bottles and transported to the laboratory by a
courier. Aliquots of samples composited from Stations IA and 1B and 3A and 3B to be
used for the bioassay testing will be transferred into a separate set of bottles and
transported to the bioassay laboratory (see below).
C %N ANCYIUAN 01EGOUPROPyl9 .DOC
Woodwa rd-Clyde
Mr Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 6
SEDI.MENT TOXICITY BIOASSAYS
The composited sediment samples from Stations 1 and 3 will be used to conduct sediment
toxicity bioassays. MBC will conduct the tests in accordance with Standard Guide for
Conducting 10-Day Static Sediment Toxicity Tests with Marine and Estuarine Amphipods.
and Standard Guide for Collection, Storage, Characterization, and Manipulation of
Sediments for Toxicological Testing. Tests will be conducted following the protocol for
use with the organism Eohaustorius estuarius. Each bioassay will include a minimum of
Live replicates of test sediment and the following three types of controls: five test
chambers of negative sediment, five rest chambers of control reference sediment, and six
test chambers of positive control sediment.
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
WC will prepare a Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QA/QC) Plan to be
implemented during the stormwater sampling, analysis, and reporting program. The
objective of the QA/QC Plan is twofold: first, to provide a mechanism for ongoing control
and evaluation of the sampling and analysis procedures throughout the course of the
project; and second, to quantify data precision and accuracy for use in future data
implementation. A strict QA/QC system will be followed in the testing and monitoring
program, including sampling, laboratory analysis, and data reporting/validation. The plan
will include elements to address sampling and analysis concerns, including sample
contamination, variability, and analytical accuracy and precision, as well as data reporting
procedures. The plan will include field standard operating procedures, sample handling
and compositing, sample representativeness, sample custody procedures, laboratory
procedures involving precision, accuracy, laboratory blanks, completeness and data
reduction, validation, and reporting.
FALSE START
We anticipate that there is the potential for a false start wherein a crew is mobilized for an
anticipated rain event and no rain event actually occurs or the event does not meet the
criteria. Our budget includes one such false start
C.\NANCY\SANDIEGOIPROP9798. DOC
e9/22/E7 ie: a3 U,OODLPRD-CLYDE a 1 61s :071 H0. 826 P028/21:
Woodward -Clyde
Mr. Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 7
DATA ANALYSIS AND REPORTING
Specifically, WC will assist the City in the following ways:
• Provide the City with summaries of the results obtained, methods of evaluating the
data, and explanations and conclusions which can be drawn from the data for each
monitoring program discussed above;
• Define each pollutant's event mean concentration and mass loading, and describe
the models used to obtain these results;
• Evaluate metals results by calculating the water quality objective for each metal at
the hardness at which it was measured, and compare the measured concentration for
each metal to the receiving water quality objective (adjusted for hardness);
• Evaluate toxicity results based on recommended statistical methods;
• Provide the City with data on applicable hydrographs and precipitation;
• Compare the current San Diego storm water monitoring results to previous years'
monitoring results, the Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) and the results
of other municipal storm water monitoring programs; and
• Identify potential trends in the stormwarer runoff data (if any).
WC will provide the City with a report summarizing the results of the information listed
above, which may be integrated into the City's annual report to the RWQCB.
NEGOTIATION WITH RWQCB
If requested, WC will assist the City in evaluating and modifying its monitoring plan and
negotiating such changes with the Regional Board. Modifications could include changes to
the overall philosophy and/or strategy proposed in the plan. For example, the City may
wish to focus its monitoring in order to provide more information regarding the stormwater
drainage system, or to learn more about the effectiveness of the overall stormwater
management program.
C: \NA NCY\ SAND IECO\PR0 P979S. DOC
Woodward -Clyde
Mr. Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 8
OPTIONAL TASKS
Ultra -Low Detection f imit Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Analysis
Beginning during wet -weather season 1996/97, Woodward -Clyde conducted ultra -low
detection limit analysis for PAHs in water samples collected from the three mass loading
stations. Texas A&M University's Geochemical and Environmental Research Group
(GERG) conducted the PAH analyses. GERG has developed special testing methods using
a modified EPA method 8270 technique to obtain detection limits of 20 nanograms/liter
(ng/L). If desired by the City, WC will perform this testing again during wet season
1997/98. Our cost estimate for this optional task is provided on the summary table of
costs (attached). Our cost estimate assumes that a total of nine samples (two samples from
each of the four mass loading stations during three storm events per station, plus one
QAIQC sample) will be analyzed.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND STAFFING
Carol Forrest will continue to serve as the Project Manager for the City's stormwater
program. She will be responsible for the overall management, and technical direction of
the project, and will serve as the City's principal point of contact. Ms. Forrest will be
assisted by key WC technical staff, including Nancy Gardiner, who will be the task
manager for the wet season monitoring.
COST ESTIMATE
A detailed cost estimate for the tasks outlined above is provided in Table I. For each
technical task, the costs are broken out in terms of WC labor hours (by staff category),
subcontractor fees (including 10% WC markup), and other direct costs. The estimated
total budget for the stormwater monitoring, ambient water toxicity, sediment toxicity, and
sediment toxicity bioassay work is 5378,887. Due to the uncertainties inherent in this type
of work, we recommend a contingency budget be added, bringing the total cost to
S393,887. Consistent with what we told the City at the time of our selection for this
project, this is approximately the same cost estimate that we provided for the 1995-96 wet
Season.
C !NANCYISANDIEGOTROP9791.DOC
09/2�/97 ip: p3 L;OODWFRD-C<_YDE a 1 619 533 3071 N0.82s Ppl2/21:
Woodward -Clyde
Mr. Robert E. Cain
City of San Diego
September 22, 1997
Page 9
If the City chooses to perform the optional task of performing 9 low detection limit PAH
analyses, the cost will be an additional S5,500.
If you have any questions regarding the proposed scope of services or costs described
above, please do not hesitate to call me at (619) 294-9400.
Very truly yours,
WOODWARD-CLYDE INTERNATIONAL-AMERICAS
Carol L. Forrest, P.E.
Vice President
Attachment
C \NANCY\SANOIECO\PROP9798.0OC
San Dingo Siorniwatet Cosl Csnrnale
WET SEASON 1997/98
CITY OFSAN DIEGO STORM WA TER SAMPLING
DETAILEII COST ESTIMATE
STAFF CATEGORY
Equpment Selection and Installation
liqupmeni Re -Installation
Dry Nun sin!) Field Crews
Pro -Siam Preparation
Stornwater Sampling
Warr and Sediment Chemical Analyses
Amtient Water Toxicity Testing
Sodineni Collection
Scdinent Toxicity bioassays
Quality Assurance/Quality Control
FalseStan
DatnAnalysis & Reporting
Ncgaialian with RWQCII
Project Management
TO741.1101 1RS/L,r,OOR COST
Subtiptra tjirl i;
(a): M(d) Technulogics, Inc
(b): Ceimic Corporation
(u)' MI)( Applied Fnvironmcnlal
Services
Principal Senior
Project
Project Assistant Senior Technical
Project Staff Assistant
Clerk
Total
Ilours
Labor [lours by Staff Category.
12 24 0 0 24
10 24 0 0 24
6 8 0 0 8
16 60 0 40 60
16 72 0 0 72
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
30 30 0 0 24
6 18 0 0 18
60 180 120 0 120
24 48 0 0 0
80 103 0 0 0
260 569 120 411 350
DE110eALTASKS
LowIlciection Limit PAII Analyses
(9 simples. performed by'lextts A & M)
$5,500
0 0
0 0
80 0
80 0
720 0
0 0
18 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
I80 30
60 0
0 0
0 0
1138 30
2'1)ER DIRECT COSTS
60
58
102
216
880
0
18
0
0
84
252
540
72
185
2507
Labor Sub -
Costs Contractors
Total
Cost
$ 7,020
56,726
56,G14
123,492
SS4, 120
S0
S900
SO
S0
510,446
S14,994
S59,460
S9,768
$25,410
S218,970
Vehicle (90 days) SS,400
Boulc Cleaning 51,800
(Ilher Fixed Costs 53,000
Communication Fee $6,570
SUBTOTAL (excluding contingency)
Contingency S15,000
Tom I. COST (including Cuntingency)
542,240 (a)
S1,320 (a)
SO
SO
SI0,560 (a)
$46,692 (b)
S 18,272 (c)
$8,703 (c)
SI0,079 (c)
SO
$5,280 (a)
S0
SO
SO
5143,147
S49,260
$8,046
$6,634
$23,492
$64,680
$46,692
519,172
58,703
510,079
510,446
S20,274
559,460
59,768
325,410
5362,117
S378,887
$393,887
TOT Al. COST (including optional task) $399,387
aPAi3•PJeMpooM
1
AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING
NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CIVIC CENTER
1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY - NOVEMBER 25, 1997 - 6:00 P.M.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO
THE CITY CLERK
IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO
YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE
CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO
KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY CITY MANAGER, TOM G.
MCCABE
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF NOVEMBER 12, 1997, AND APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 18, 1997.
COUNCIL AGENDA
11/25/97 Page 2
MAYOR'S PRESENTATIONS
Fire Department
Building & Safety Department
PROCLAMATIONS
Proclaiming the remaining holiday months of 1997 and all of 1998 as:
"BUCKLE UP FOR LIFE CHALLENGE"
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters which are of a
routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by
approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item
may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately
considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of
the public.
1. Resolution No. 97-150
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the
issuance of a building permit for improvements to the historical house
located at 341 F Avenue (Tyson House). (Building & Safety)
2. Resolution No. 97-151
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City dedicating a
portion of right-of-way and naming it Plaza Bonita Center Way.
(Engineering)
3. WARRANT REGISTER #21 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $242,151.39.
COUNCIL AGENDA
11/25/97 Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
4. Consolidated Cash and Investment Report as of July 31, 1997. (Finance)
NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS
5. Resolution No. 97-152
Resolution of the City Council of the City Of National City declaring Shasta
Constructors, Inc. to be the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, and
authorizing the Mayor to execute an Agreement with Shasta Constructors,
Inc. for the construction of the National City Boulevard Bridge at Old
Sweetwater River Channel, Bridge No. 57C-679, Project No. 5066(004).
Engineering Specs No. 92-15. (Engineering)
OLD BUSINESS
6. Consider scheduling City Council workshop for further consideration of
voluntary campaign expenditure limits under Proposition 208. (City
Attorney)
7. Proposed National City Public Library expenditure plan describing projects
and services for which sales tax revenues may be expended. (Library)
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Information from the Community Food Bank of National City.
COUNCIL AGENDA
11/25/97 Page 5
NEW BUSINESS (Cont.)
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit)
NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought
back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated
emergency or urgent nature.
CLOSED SESSION
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION —
Government Code Section 54956.9(a). Herb Fox, et al. v. County of San
Diego, et al; County of San Diego v. City of National City and Community
Development Commission of the City of National City; City Of National City,
Community Development Commission of the City Of National City v. State
Water Resources Control Board. et al.
ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular City Council Meeting — December 2, 1997 - 3:00 p.m. -
Council Chambers, Civic Center.
TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO
IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
31rnr1ama1thu
WHEREAS, Traffic crashes are the NUMBER ONE killer of Americans, ages 1-38, and
last year in California, 3,972 people were killed in traffic crashes, on our
streets and highways; and
WHEREAS, The safety seat belt has been proven to be the most effective life-saving
and injury -reducing device for all types of motor vehicle crashes; and
WHEREAS, As many as 2,000 lives could be saved each year if every driver and
passenger in California would wear safety seat belts during every trip in a
car; and
WHEREAS,
The BUCKLE UP FOR LIFE CHALLENGE has been extended through
1997—this extension will give city governments, community organizations,
business, industry and labor an additional opportunity to help bring about
a significant increase in seat belt and child car seat usage, by focusing
public attention on the life-saving benefits of these safety devices.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE H. WATERS, Mayor of the City of National
City, do hereby proclaim the remaining holiday months of 1997 and ail of
1998 as:
BUCKLE UP FOR LIFE CHALLENGE
in National City.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of
National City be affixed this 25th day of November, 1997
GEORGE H. WATERS
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
November 25, 1997
MEETING DATE
1
AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HISTORICAL HOUSE LOCATED AT
341 F AVENUE
PREPARED BY Michael Bouse, Director
EXPLANATION
DEPARTMENT
Building and Safety
The single family dwelling located at 341 F Avenue was recently damaged by fire. The property is on
the roster of Locally Designated Significant Buildings contained in the General Plan. In accordance
with National City Municipal Code Section 18.139.030, review and approval by the Historical Society
and City Council are required before building permits may be issued for improvements to the property.
The property owner is desirous of repairing the fire damage and renovating the structure including
adding a new 270 square foot kitchen and closet, adding a new 348 square foot second story deck,
repairing the front and rear porches, installing a perimeter foundation, and painting the exterior of the
building.
Attachments A-E are the plot plan and building elevations of the house. Attachment F is a
memorandum from the Historical Society dated October 1, 1997, with recommendations regarding
approval of the project. All recommendations of the Historical Society have been incorporated into the
approved plans. The plans have been reviewed and approved by affected City departments, and the
issuance of the building permit is pending City Council authorization. Attachment G is a resolution for
consideration by the City Council authorizing the issuance of the building permit.
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
X N/A
Account No. N/A
SAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No 97-150
Attachments A-E: Plot Plan and Building Elevations.
Attachment F: Historical Society Memorandum of October 1, 1997.
Attachment G: Resolution
A-2C0 12e• ',89'
RESOLUTION NO. 97-150
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING
THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR
IMPROVEMENTS TO THE HISTORICAL HOUSE
LOCATED AT 341 F AVENUE (TYSON HOUSE)
WHEREAS, the single family dwelling located at 341 F Avenue was recently
damaged by fire; and
WHEREAS, the property known as the Tyson House is on the roster of Locally
Designated Significant Buildings contained in the General Plan; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with National City Municipal Code Section
18.139.030, review and approval by the Historical Society and City Council are required
before building permits may be issued for improvements to historical buildings; and
WHEREAS, on October 1, 1997, the Historical Society recommending approval
with recommendations regarding the projects; and
WHEREAS, all recommendations of the Historical Society have been
incorporated into the approved plans which have been reviewed and approved by City
departments.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
National City that the City Council does hereby authorize the issuance of a building permit for
improvements to the historical house located at 341 F Avenue (Tyson House).
PASSED and ADOPTED this 25th day of November, 1997.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
PAWoSe PR We W Ay
3'/a HPcc
i
zs'
11•i" •1
o
21'
EA/6TIN71
rq AR46E ARCA
18:9r x Iv.‘"
E
—..—t
21'.9"
SEC s...144
P.11 Leaa.o
PET4 L of
r
.:..frlM4
RrA..c..Ay
LI
CI
17. L" --R
cx
}/OdSE
33; /0 X S/.'a"
3.,or
R6' sA--b' —«
Sit, gceo fq. FT
PAOPwe 17r froRi IWDr. AoY .-1,93o 41.F:
PRopn.i 2'i a roni VuocK Row • 1.1-4 flit
ToIAL Calet Rqq VN I R.fr= 3,4.1 51.Fx
F3dO'
3 srarr
341 "F' 4V6 NAn4N,K. CiTy CA 9/95a
.c..•: •_ .rrw.mn. .....n AANY.7.
TA7-n
rorAI I.iVoe* CGV•R moo To for aaY, wmi Our arcs
TOIL UND•A C. U.R. Met 440 4cc.. !t% Floo4444 7r for Ram_
7OPcr. ,ip.DWCd
AOD.T/O,v / MOOEL .# 3.4.
9 1M3! 1H9dllti
11. 1'
9' 7'
znd STo4y
En11j1M(
rw op o.e
G
e Y31iN1'
.01,111114
Roy
Ii
Gltnpol• 1 1.1..1
poPF M11TLH
E.11Tn.a R F Vl
S1\NLLL 113111A
3 TILL
rAmmordsocamr
411111,41111.411/411
Mar 411MSINIPMEMONVAMIMPANIAMINIAINIAMIAINIMMII
rw-- ---ammorAnimmr
W.M1111141MP-
PRo pa Lc
Ir —
II IIIIII Illlllllll�
11I I {HT
Csa.11114 O.!
III III I 111111
COLOR S
E%ISTINcT /101156 IS w II tie WITR 3RO.IN TRIMS
Ncw co�aR well BC wN1TE WITH 110.owu TRIMS
Rey Colon CRANTIE w111 BC RPPROJC By Die
N\STORICHt_ S0c.16 iy
NNTCRMLS
ROOF SNINC1cE TO MFIrCH EIISTI'O,
SIDINCI TO 6c \.J000 10 NA;co EXgrsu#
NORTH ELEVTION
'I III 11111
11111 111111111111
1- I
0
39'. 5'
3'41 Fr" Ma AMON.,L
rry
dd. 11950
....o...wi
ww w MAW
Tare
TOPcrE "ter.' iOE.rcc
ADD;r,On/ /FQQ,0/OO, L
0..1..u.1e
E-/
0 1H3WHJH11d
.1
GV ITuc
1 su aoV
L
r/I/a V////1
DECK RAILINA DeTA,LS
cntTM4 Roof
3 Ttlu, SN,H4,Lt (AaMI•I-l)
/ / /
I /
l 7
r.. j... PAOPoac NW Pao,'
ANo a\Au<NMe TM\I
L l 1 /
b1;I unTW C\,tTrN(
Roof 31•.t cy'y'lc
U.AW
Popoae uoacT
6o a\, IF_
I 11—_- II
M•\T y'
V •uwVl
A 11111111 _11111111 LI] 1111111l 11 MIMI
SOUTH ELEVATION
COI.oRS
e rol , NOu62 15 WNlTQ WITH BROWN TPINS
New coLoR wilt ee wNIIJ WITH BaowN TRIM
Awl COLOR ON.,-44F W411 dd APPZOJ, by Toe
RltroR,<Pc society.
MATE A,5
RooF sNW4re- TO HATCH EMIarINl,
SIoiNCT To be WCoo To nagrc.H EAIar/N{,
_I FM LI II 11111- ]1II11:F
to t.tt
AFL
t- tSTN V14WJ
I 1
r�i Pi otase RA �L 3L' N ( Deac
'H11 J.M Nt IL... tv.It'yt
IM
341 "r AVE. NATIONAL CITY cq 9195a
elT oa.oc,]pyr/
Topes rea.oc.te
gOOI rdo✓
atl Ho of I-
5-1
S-4-3-S 4 S
1
o ll Ji—
ll1IIltiifwIIIIIIii
_raorc.. o •.. a.......♦ 34' H
T. .I
'a'" �- SWPPaR
I
l
11111111111111
C OLOR5
E. %1.7iN C- ROuSd IS CNI T$C WITH BROWN TRIMS
NEW WIN BE wIThC WITH CRGWN 7�tIN•b
A.+y CO'- e. .-.sE WIII PE AprROVC 6y 'roc
HISTO RIC Ac
MATe0.1A1-S
--
RooF
`-.I(.I 1,141 IC, 1)E
TO MATCH=ISTIHIT
wCOO -10 MATCH e.IsnNii
11111111111111
EAST ELEVATION
lE
341 F. AVE NATIONAL CITY C.
....a.w n: I wwn n NIII
....:O9-c7-17 I.. o avers
TOpETE Rea, IKN cE
AppiTlON / RfND DEG
��-3
COt_o RS
Er.ISTIN R, 110,11E IS 1.-1N1TE WITH BPo1.rN T2I.e1
NEW CfLo'Z Wnl 8C 4.1H,1E 4311H BPowN T0.1H1
AP✓µoJE 8y THC
ANl1 (OLY i. CHANh2
NlsiORlcPL SocleT'
43,11 EC
NATEAIP,_
ROOF SHINGLE TO NeicH CRI41INr,
S I1 INh ro Et 4/001 To .IAl[H ETIbTlNf1
/ /
/j
L
/
J
r1.1(..I
1111ITITIli1
76,
l / / / r
11 111T1T1Tllfnr 1 11 LI RI11
�-
1
i//
//A
WEST ELEVATION
TTI
IL
CX,01N4 Leo,
Y INCOJ
31 / 1 r " AVE. N.1Ti0A/AL a✓T/ (r4.
°".. 8-16-77
Tp•orl
TOo❑%C /1C$/OCNce—
/100/7-/cA✓ / Re —NODE,
National City Historical Society
P. O. Box 1251, National City, CiIifornia, 91951
MEMO
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: National City Historical Society
DATE: October 1, 1997
SUBJECT: 341 F Avenue, Topete house remodel
At the October 1, 1997 meeting it was agreed in general to approve
the remodel requests. We do however have several questions and
comments, as follows:
1. Roof: what is it made of?
Recommendation: material, either asphalt or wood that looks
like wood shingles
2. Windows: On the west and south sides, will the windows
remain the same as they were? i.e. same size and made of wood
Recommendations: Windows frames should be constructed of
wood, and of the same size as the original, which on a house of
that vintage approximates 3' by 6'. The molding should be the
same dimension as the original
3. Deck:
Recommendations: it should be as unobtrusive as possible
4. Siding:
Recommendations: it should duplicate the original
F/)edZie7iti-
ATTACHMENT F
x
N/A
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 2
November 25, 1997
ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION DEDICATING AND NAMING, A PORTION OF THE PLAZA
BONITA CENTER WAY RIGHT-OF-WAY
PREPARED BY DIN DANESHFAR
DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING
EXPLANATION.
In 1992 and 1993, the City purchased several properties in the vicinity of
Plaza Bonita Center Way, previously known as Reo Drive in order to
construct the street (Plaza Bonita Center Way)from Valley Road to
Sweetwater Road. The right-of-way which was required for the construction
of Plaza Bonita Center Way, extended from Valley Road to approximately 663
feet north of Sweetwater Road. The attached legal description, and plat
indicate the location of the public right-of-way for street purposes.
This resolution will provide for the dedication of the conveyance for Plaza
Bonita Center Way. The resolution will also name the dedicated parcel of
land as Plaza Bonita Center Way.
J
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No.
TAFF ' . • MMENDATIO
Adopt t e Reso utio
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below/
1. Resolution
2. Legal Description
3. Plat
97-151
Resolution No.
na 35'1,_ o/eo)
RESOLUTION NO. 97- 151
RESOLUTION OF '1`HL, CITY COUNCIL OF
nth CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DEDICATING
A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND
NAMING IT PLAZA BONITA CENTER WAY
WHEREAS, the City is the owner of property in the vicinity of Plaza Bonita
Center Way, as depicted on the attached Exhibit "A", and wishes to dedicate said property for
right-of-way purposes.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City that the property depicted on the attached Exhibit "A" is hereby dedicated for
public street purposes, and is named Plaza Bonita Center Way.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 25th day of November, 1997.
George H. Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dana, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PLAZA BONITA CENTER WAY
A PORTION OF THE EASTERLY ONE HALF OF QUARTER SECTION 100 OF THE RANCHO
DE LA NACION, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 166 FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE
RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF QUARTER SECTION 100; THENCE NORTH
17° 45' 43" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID QUARTER SECTION 100 A DISTANCE
OF 662.38 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 72° 14' 55" WEST
A DISTANCE OF 83.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 17° 45' 43" WEST A DISTANCE OF 41.25
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OFA TANGENT455.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE
SOUTHWEST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A DELTA OF
22° 48' 13", ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 181.09 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY TO A
LINE; THENCE NORTH 40° 33' 56" WEST ALONG SAID LINE A DISTANCE OF 48.09 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 42° 07' 40" WEST A DISTANCE OF 110.04 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40° 33'
56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 19.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT TO A 548.00
FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY
ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A DELTA OF 32° 29' 31", ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF
310.77 FEET; THENCE NORTH 70° 36' 42" WEST A DISTANCE OF 39.86 FEET TO A NON -
TANG ENT POINT ON A 225.00 FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH
RADIAL BEARING OF SOUTH 11° 02' 20" EAST SAID CURVE BEING THE SOUTHERLY
RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF VALLEY ROAD PER CALTRANS MAP NO. 49514-1 AND
DIRECTORS DEED NO. 26963-01-01; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH
A DELTA OF 5' 57 17", ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 23.38 FEET TO A POINT WITH
RADIAL BEARING NORTH 5' 05' 03" WEST; THENCE NORTH 85' 00' 12" EAST ALONG SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 129.34 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENT
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHEAST WITH A RADIAL BEARING SOUTH 4° 59' 48" EAST;
THENCE WESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A DELTA OF 94°
12' 39" ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 32.89 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A 452.00 FOOT
RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST WITH RADIAL BEARING NORTH 80° 47'
33" EAST; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A DELTA OF 31° 21'
29", ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 247.38 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY TO A LINE;
THENCE ALONG SAID LINE SOUTH 40° 33' 56" EAST A DISTANCE OF 19.20 FEET; THENCE
SOUTH 39° 00' 12" EAST A DISTANCE OF 110.04 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 40° 33' 56" EAST
A DISTANCE OF 48.09 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 545.00 FOOT RADIUS
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST WITH RADIAL BEARING SOUTH 49° 26' 04" WEST;
THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A DELTA OF 13° 36' 36",
ALONG AN ARC DISTANCE OF 129.46 FEET TO A NON -TANGENT POINT ON THE
EASTERLY LINE OF QUARTER SECTION 100 WITH RADIAL BEARING SOUTH 63° 02' 40"
WEST; THENCE SOUTH 17° 45' 43" EAST ALONG SAID EAST_DISTANCE OF
128.36 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
NAT'L CITY E_:G2. DEFT. No. G.' 9 3
REF. BY
C::D 1-`-; DATE.10�,..�f�Z CAD r"f/
DATE
Hasoo1YE
\
= 3229'31"
548.00'
l = 310.7 7'
.11
p - 9c12'31r
R z 20.00'
L 32.89'
= 31'21 9
R = 452.00'
L = 247.38'
� \f
y g-17-57
Qs
t� T
p - I336'39"
R=545.=
L — 129.46
6 = =11,13-
R = 455.00'
L = 157.07
H72��,if Ra
� J
RIGHT—OF—WAY PLAT OF LEGAL DESCR!FTION
PLAZA 6CN!TA CENTER WAY
.5277 acres
66,546 S.F.
NAT'L CITY ENCR. DEFT. No. 93 1
REF. BY DATE
cxD (i.;.7' DATE IC /91 C?: DATE
3611
TRUE POINT
00 R 66
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE NOV . 2 5 , 19 9 7
AGENDA ITEM NO.
3
ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #21
PREPARED BY TESS E. LIMFUECO DEPARTMENT FINANCE DEPT.
EXPLANATION
RATIFICATION OF WARRANT REGISTER #21
PER GOVERNMENT SECTION CODE 32708.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
I RECOMMEND RATIFICATION OF THESE WARRANTS FOR A TOTAL
OF $252,025.40
rjn •
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
1. WARRANT REGISTER #21
2. WORKER'S COMP WARRANT REGISTER DATED 11/18/97
A.200 (Re.. 9/80)
TO:
City of National City
Department of Finance
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950-4397
(619) 336-4261
THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL•MEMBERS
FROM: MARIA L. MATIENZO, FINANCE DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: RATIFICATION OF WARRANTS AND/OR PAYROLL
REGISTER NO. 21
GENERAL FUND
LIBRARY FUND
PARKS _MAINTENANCE FUN
GRANT -(A LITERACY CAM
RETIREMENT FUND
GAS TAXES FUND
LOWER SWEETiATER FUND
SEWliR SERVICE FUND
FIRE DEPT ACTIVITIES
TINY TOT CLASSES FUND
GRANT BUDGE PROGRAM
GRANT -COPS UNIVERSAL
STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY
REGISTER TOTALS
PAYROLL
TOTAL
90,005.72
1,646.04
2,384.90
173.30
3,721.16
750.00
1,595.85
3,015.46
228.99
47.61
424.77
2,740.67
10.22
GRANT -NC SUPPR. OF DR
LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRI
NPT BUS DONATIONS FUN
GRANT-C.D.B.G.
CDC PAYMENTS
PROPOSITION "A" FUND
TDr
FACILITIES MAINT FUND
LIABILITY INS. FUND
GENERAL SERVICES FUND
INFORMATION SERVICES
MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUN
TRUST & AGENCY
3,570.85
15.41
63.31
1,005.52
570.25
5,684.13
52,017.83
17,154.21
47,132.39
2,362.41
2,332.84
2,568.04
918.50
242,151.39
0.00
242,151.39
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE DEMANDS AS LISTED ABOVE AND COVERED BY:
WARRANT NUMBERS 146287 THROUGH 146369 INCLUSIVE
EXCEPTING NONE/ 103387 THROUGH 103430 INCLUSIVE
ARE CORRECT AND JUST TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND CONFORM TO THE
BUDGET FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THAT MONEY IS AVAILABLE IN
THE PROPER FUNDS TO PAY SAID DEMANDS.
i
MARIA L. MATIENZO, FINANCE DIRZTOP
Recycled Paper
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE November 25, 1997 4
AGENDA ITEM NO
r ITEM TITLE
CONSOLIDATED CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF JULY 31, 1997
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION.
C. Fredricks 4. .
DEPARTMENT
Finance
For the City Council's information and in compliance with the City's investment policy, the
consolidated cash and investment report as of July 31, 1997 is hereby submitted. This report reflects
the components of the investment portfolio as of July 31, 1997 and the results of the investment
program for the period then ended. The investment portfolio provides for sufficient liquidity to meet
the following month's estimated expenditures.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
Not applicable.
Account No
TAFF RECOMMENDATION
We recommend that the report be accepted and filed. .7"-)--) . 77—)
BOARD/ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (listed Below) Resolution No
1. Cash Account Summary. 5. Monthly Statement of Receipts.
2. Investment Summary by Maturity Date. 6. Monthly Statement of Disbursements.
3. Investment Summary by Investment Type. 7. Pooled Investment Transactions Report.
4. C ns lidatcd Cash Rcp rt.
A-200 (Rev. ,/SC)
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CASH ACCOUNT SUMMARY
July 1997
REVOLVING CASH
RETURNED CHECKS
BANK OF AMERICA #80200
OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
PAYROLL OUTSTANDING WARRANTS
INVESTMENTS
TOTAL
INVESTMENT EARNINGS HISTORY:
FISCAL YEAR
1997-98
1 996-97
1995-96
1 994-95
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
1990-91
1989-90
1988-89
1 987-88
1986-87
1985-86
1984-85
$
BALANCE
4,999.35
1,346.73
310,531 .93
-544,484.83
-14,683.85
24, 614, 460.09
$ 24,372,169.42
YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL YEAR
-2,868.11 $
-1,151.50
116,572.09
38,764.91
53,620.93
-1,534.37
- 39,451 .1 1
- 91,142.11
-165,268.93
- 10,100.72
8,453.02
41, 528.20
209,099.23
90,821 .87
1,256,907.31
974,1 13.25
1,001,709.56
1,01 1 ,586.52
721 ,91 3.49
864,052.63
1,303,878.52
1,544,993.71
1,31 1,930.94
979,435.87
1,048,978.23
1 ,321 ,688.93
1,543,266.30
07WECCN XLS
I YI'E
Mitsubishi bill_ Corp.
Commercial Paper
GE Capital
Commercial Paper
Franklin Resources, Inc.
Commercial Paper
Mitsubishi Intl. Corp.
Commercial Paper
Pilnoy Bowes Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper
Ford Motor Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper
Federal Nail MTG Assn
Discounted Note
Apex Funding Corp.
Commercial Paper
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds
Federal National Morlpage
Association Bonds
Ford Motor Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper
CC USA, Inc. Commercial
Paper
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
I3Y MATURITY DATE
July 1997
r 311111 E ll I
FINANCIAL. DAIF OF IIAIF OF I'N11(:IIAST_ AMOUNT CARRYINGCIF( MA1URI1YT INTEREST
INS:IC13lf.1QN ULI'USII MA!UIIIIY 1I11(A MAI011E11
COS _>_ Iz_M4NIIIS RAIE
13ancAmcrica Securites, Inc. 4/14/9/ 7/9/91 S493,370.83 S500,000.00
PaineWebber, Inc. 4/15/97 a
7/15/9/ 493,037.50 r
r c r 00,000.00
N/A 5.730%
BancAmerica Securites, Inc. 4/21/97 7/17/97 296,085.00 300,0(10.00
N/A 5.550%
BancAmerica Securites, Inc. 5/1/97 8/4/97
197,055.00 o,r.00 S 191,UCi5.(10
NIA 5.74045
llancAmerica Securites, Inc. 4/17/9/ 8/18/97 392,551.67
392,551.67
N/A 5.630°b
O'Connor & Co. Securities 5/15/97 9/30/07 279,914 7p
278,914.78
N/A 5.690%
PaineWebber, Inc. 5/2/97 10/24/97 194,565.211
194,565.28
N/A 5.83090
O'Connor & Co. Securities 6/27/97 10/31/9/ 2,15,135.00
245,135.00 NIA 5.6/0',6
Gillord Securities, Inc. 6/30/9/ I1/10/97 205,418.24
205,418.24
N/A 5.570 io
Gillen] Securities, Inc. 7/2/91 11/10/97 106,071.78
106,071.78 N/A 5.580%
PaineWebber, Inc. //16/9/ 1 I/12/9/ 250,359.00
260,359.00
N/A 5.64046
O'Connor & Co. Securities 6/20/9 r 11/13/97 244,393.19
244,393.19 N/A 5.660%
Page 1of3
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 7/30/07 7/30/98 250,000.00
250,000.00 N/A 5.860%
Certificate of Deposit Balboa Thrift & Loan 7/2/97 8/3/98 95,000.00
95,000.00 $99,528.00 6.400%
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
July 1997
CURRENT
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE AMOUNT CARRYING MARKET
MATURITYE
TYPE INSTITUTIONINTEREST
DEP4alI iMMALURITY PIKE MATURED COST
> 12 MONTHS HATE
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of San Diego 7/11/97
4/6/98 $99,000.00 $99,000.00 N/A
5.850%
Certificate of Deposit New West Thrift & Loan Corp. 7/16/97 4/16/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 5.900%
Certificate of Deposit Franklin Bank 4/27/97 4/27/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.000%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds First Tennessee Bank 5/22/97 5/22/98 100,000.00
100,000.00 N/A 6.130%
Certificate of Deposit California Pacific Bank 6/16/97 6/16/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit Girard Savings Bank 7/1/97
7/1/98 99,000.00 99,000.00
N/A 6.200%
Certificate of Deposit Flagship Federal Savings Bank 7/2/97
7/2/98 99,000.00 99,000.00
N/A 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of Marin 7/15/97 7/16/97 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.200%
Certificate of Deposit Republic Bank 7/3/97 7/24/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6,250%
Federal Home Loan Mtg Bud PaineWebber, Inc. 5/13/97 9/14/98 98,937.50
98,937.50 103,770.00 6.210%
Local Agency Investment Fund State of California Treasurer N/A
N/A N/A 15,262,431.79 N/A o
5.679 /o
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Medium Term Note First Tennessee Bank 5/13/97 9/23/98 201,185.06
201,165.06 207,935.06 6.190%
Pooled Investment Fund San Diego County Treasurer N/A N/A
N/A 3,244,358.81 N/A
3.810%
Total Investments
$ 24, 614, 460.09
Page 3 of 3
TYPE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY MATURITY DATE
July 1997
CURRENT
MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE AMOUNT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPQ5IT MATURITY PRICE MATURED c4aT RATE
Nomura Holdings
Commercial Paper Gilford Securities, Inc. 7/16/97 11/14/97 $196,302.78 $196,302.78 N/A 5.600%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Medium Term Note Gilford Securities, Inc. 6/25/97 11/21/97 151,761.78 151,761.78 N/A 5.570%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 6/30/97 12/10/97 138,066.20 138,068.20 NIA 5.500%
Ford Motor Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper PaineWebber, Inc. 7/15/97 12/12/97 249,188.12 249,188.12 N/A 5.680%
Creative Capital, Inc.
Commercial Paper Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 6/20/97 12/16/97 243,163.19 243,163.19 N/A 5.660%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Discount Notes Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 6/30/97 12/17/97 243,719.44 243,719.44 N/A 5.630%
Student Loan Medium Term
Note Gilford Securities, Inc. 6/23/97 12/24/97 169,516.67 169,516.67 N/A 5.600%
Certificate of Deposit National Bank of California 7/3/97 12/30/97 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 5.940%
General Electric Capital Corp.
Commercial Paper Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 7/14/97 1/9/98 194,565.36 194,566.36 N/A 5.700%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 7/15/97 1/28/98 367,412.60 367,412.60 N/A 5.620%
Certificate of Deposit Life Savings Bank 7/8/97 1/30/98 99,000.00 99,000.00 N/A 6.050%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 7/11/97 2/9/98 205,462.22 205,462.22 N/A 5.620%
Certificate of Deposit California Commerce Bank 7/3/97 i 2/27/98 98,922.63 98,922.63 N/A 5.960%
Page 2 of 3
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
July 1997
IYPE
Mitsubishi Intl. Corp.
Commercial Paper BancAmerica Securites, Inc. 4/14/97 7/9/97 $493,370.83 $500,000.00
N/A 5.700%
GE Capital
Commercial Paper
Franklin Resources, Inc.
Commercial Paper
Mitsubishi Intl. Corp.
Commercial Paper
Pitney Bowes Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper
Ford Motor Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper
Apex Funding Corp.
Commercial Paper
Ford Motor Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper
CC USA, Inc. Commercial
Paper
Nomura Holdings
Commercial Paper
Ford Motor Credit Corp.
Commercial Paper
Creative Capital, Inc.
Cununorclal Paper
CURRENT
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE AMOUNT CARRYING MARKET IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION IIEP LI MATURITY PF11ICE MATURED coal .2_12 MONIIifl HATE
PaineWebber, Inc. 4/15/97 7/15/97 493,037.50 500,000.00
N/A 5.730%
BancAmerica Securites, Inc. 4/21/97 7/17/97 296,085.00 300,000.00
N/A 5.550%
BancAmerica Securites, Inc. 5/1/97 8/4/97 197,055.00
$197,055.00 N/A 5.740%
BancAmerica Securites, Inc. 4/17/97 8/18/97 392,551.67
392,551.67 N/A 5.630%
O'Connor & Co. Securities 5/16/97 9/30/07 278,914.78
278,914.78 N/A 5.690°1,
O'Connor & Co. Securities 6/27/97 10/31/97 245,135.00
245,135.00 N/A 5.670%
PaineWebber, Inc. 7/15/97 11/12/97 250,359.00 250,359.00 N/A °
5.640%
O'Connor & Co. Securities 6/20/97 11/13/97 244,393.19 244,393.19 N/A °
6.660 /o
Gifford Securities, Inc. 7/16/97 11/14/97 196,302.7E
196,302.78 N/A 5.600%
PaineWebber, Inc. 7115/97 12/12/97 249,188.12 249,188.12 N/A °
5.680,E
Mischlor Financial Croup, Inc, 6/20/97 12/16/97 243,163,19 243,163,19 N/A 5.660%
Page 1 of 4
IYPE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
July 1997
CURRENT
MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE AMOUNT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
INSTITUTION DEPOSIT MAIUBITY PRICE MATSlBEi2 COSI > 12 MONTHS BALE
General Electric Capital Corp.
Commercial Paper Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 7/14/97 1/9/98 $194,565.36 $194,565.36 N/A 5.700%
Total Commercial Paper
2,491,628.09
Federal Nail MTG Assn
Discounted Note PaineWebber, Inc. 5/2/97 10/24/97 194,565.28 194,565.28 N/A 5.830%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds Gilford Securities, Inc. 6/30/97 11/10/97 205,418.24 205,418.24 N/A 5.570%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds Gilford Securities, Inc. 7/2/97 11/10/97 106,071.78 106,071.78 N/A 5.580%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Medium Term Note Gilford Securities, Inc. 6/25/97 11/21/97 151,761.78 151,761.78 N/A 5.570%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 6/30/97 12/10/97 138,068.20 138,068.20 N/A 5.500%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Discount Notes Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 6/30/97 12/17/97 243,719.44 243,719.44 N/A 5.530%
Student Loan Medium Term
Note Gilford Securities, Inc. 6/23/97 12/24/97 169,516.67 169,516.67 N/A 5.600%
Federal National Mortgage
Association Bonds Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 7/15/97 1/28/98 367,412.60 367,412.60 N/A 5.620%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable RRfoutis Mischler Financial Group, Inc. 7/11/97 2/9/98 205,462.22 205,462.22 N/A 5.620%
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds First Tennessee Bank 5/22/97 5/22/98 100,000.00 100,000.00 N/A 6.130°k
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
INVESTMENT SUMMARY
BY INVESTMENT TYPE
July 1997
TYPE
Federal Home Loan Bank
Callable Bonds MultiBank Securities, Inc. 7/30/07 7/30/98 $250,000.00
$250,000.00 N/A 5.860%
Federal Home Loan Mtg Bnd PaineWebber, Inc. 5/13/97 9/14/98 96,937.50
98,937.50 $103,770.00 6.210%
Federal Farm Credit Bank
Medium Term Note First Tennessee Bank 5/13/97 9/23/98 201,185.06
201,185.06 207,935.06 6.190%
Total U.S. Government Securities
2,432,1 18.77
CURRENT
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PURCHASE AMOUNT CARRYING MARKET
MATURITY
INSTITUTION INTEREST
DEPO5[I MAT1fBfLY EB10E MATURED CM > 12 MQNTHS
RATE
Certificate of Deposit National Bank of California 7/3/97 12/30/97 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 5.940%
Certificate of Deposit Life Savings Bank 7/8/97 1/30/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.050%
Certificate of Deposit California Commerce Bank 7/3/97 2/27/98 98,922.63
98,922.63 N/A 5.950%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of San Diego 7/11/97
4/6/98 99,000.00 99,000.00
N/A 5.850%
Certificate of Deposit New West Thrift & Loan Corp. 7/16/97 4/16/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 5.900%
Certificate of Deposit Franklin Bank 4/27/97 4/27/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit California Pacific Bank 6/16/97 6/16/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit Girard Savings Bank 7/1/97 7/1/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.200%
Certificate of Deposit Flagship Federal Savings Bank 7/2/97 7/2/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.000%
Certificate of Deposit First National Bank of Marin 7/15/97 7/16/97 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.200%
Certificate of Deposit Republic Bank 7/3/97 7/24/98 99,000.00
99,000.00 N/A 6.250%
Certificate of Deposit Balboa Thrift & Loan 7/2/97 8/3/98 95,000.00
95,000.00 $99,528.00 6.400%
Total Certificates of Deposit
1,183,922.63
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF NATION/ CPI
INVESTMENT SlY JIAF
BY INVESTMENT -i
July 1997
CURRENT
MARKET VALUE
FINANCIAL DATE OF DATE OF PU1 CHASE AMOUNT CARRYING IF MATURITY INTEREST
TYPE INULTL T14f1 DEPOSII MAMMY 1- " F, MATUBEQ 44aI ? 12M4t1TH5 BALE
Pooled Investment Fund San Diego County Treasurer N/A N/A N/A $3,244,358.81 N/A 3.810%
Local Agency Investment Fund State of California Treasurer N/A N/A N/A 15,262,431.79 N/A 5.679%
Total Pooled Investments
Total Investments
18, 506, 790.60
$24,614,460.09
Page 4 of 4
FUND
NUMBER
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CONSOLIDATED CASH REPORT
ALL FUNDS
July 31, 1997
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
102 TECHNOLOGY FUND
103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
106 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN
107 [RETIREMENT FUND
108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY
109 GAS TAXES FUND
112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND
115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND
123 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY FUND
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND
126 IFIRE DEPT ACTIVITIES FUND
130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND
131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND
145 JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND
154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND
157 :SUPPL. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF)
159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE
165 LSCA TITLE III GRANT
169 LOCAL LAW ENFORCE BLOCK GRANT
170 LITERACY INITIATIVES V
179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND
221 PLAZA BONITA BONDS
307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND
308 HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB. FUND
312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY
626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND
643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND
718 TRUST & AGENCY
721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND
ENDING
BALANCE
2,538,729.33
920,908.93
1,417,711.25
4,194.02
11,738.97
43,274.23
991,406.60
123,171 .57
21,051 .08
17,252.33
113.41
10,284,081 .84
965.16
82,635.20
76,296.25
6,116.10
10,871.21
28,990.15
127,378.96
113,744.08
18,775.00
59,125.03
23,739.38
1,489.04
2,425.00
2,200,558.35
18,503.78
872, 91 1.21
385,995.52
3,516,387.68
225,582.44
182,920.85
43,125.47
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 24,372,169.42
MONTHLY STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS
FOR THE MONTH OF JULY
FUND FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
102 TECHNOLOGY FUND
108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY
109 GAS TAXES FUND
112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND
115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND
131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND
147 JUDGE PROGRAM
156 PHOTO -RADAR FUND
158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND
169 LOCAL LAW ENFORCE BLOCK GRANT
179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND
307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND
312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY
552 TDA
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND
718 TRUST & AGENCY
721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
JULY YTD.JULY
799,220.16 799,220.15
10.00 10.00
275.67 275.67
(10,356.78) (10,356.78)
63,234.92 63,234.92
5,450.80 5,450.80
2,252.33 2,252.33
(351,150.25) (351,1 50.25)
(760.20) . (760.20)
(13,521.00) (13,521.00)
263.10 263.10
15,435.50 15,435.50
(2,097.39) (2,097.39)
1,489.04 1,489.04
(25,804.49) (25,804.49)
(7,213.07) (7,213.07)
76,396.40 76,396.40
83,004.45 83,004.45
17,443.33 17,443.33
(475.82) (475.82)
653,096.70 653,096.70
MONTHLY STATEMENT OF DISBURSEMENTS
FOR THE MONTH OF JULY
FUND
FUND TITLE
001 GENERAL FUND
104 LIBRARY FUND
105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND
106 CALIFORNIA LITERACY CAMPAIGN
107 RETIREMENT FUND
109 GAS TAXES FUND
111 P.O.S.T. FUND
112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND
123 FAMILIES FOR LITERACY FUND
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND
126 FIRE DEPT ACTIVITIES FUND
136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND
138 SECTION 321 GRANT
147 JUDGE PROGRAM
153 COPS UNIVERSAL HIRING GRANT
154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND
156 PHOTO -RADAR FUND
158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND
165 LSCA TITLE III GRANT
167 NC SUPPRESSION OF DRUG ABUSE
170 LITERACY INITIATIVES V
171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT
176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME
301 C.D.B.G.
302 CDC PAYMENTS
307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND
313 CMAQ GRANT
552 TDA
626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND
628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND
632 INFORMATION SERVICES
643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND
718 TRUST & AGENCY
JULY
681,237.40
35,410.05
24,371 .74
598.43
2,478.45
(4,035.58)
300.00
2,680.61
94.18
12,023.36
(36.61)
(38.71)
99.26
2,581 .15
8,736.96
368.14
626.41
14,499.00
750.00
2,825.88
809.19
965.12
5,797.96
32,422.53
17,772.27
(54,545.70)
(14, 607.80)
139,512.35
29,353.11
254,378.75
2,718.23
14,889.16
25,456.66
(491.11)
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1,240,000.84
YTD.JULY
681,237.40
35,410.05
24,371 .74
598.43
2,478.45
(4,035.58)
300.00
2,680.61
94.18
12,023.36
(36.61)
(38.71)
99.26
2,581.15
8,736.96
368.14
626.41
14, 499.00
750.00
2,825.88
809.19
965.12
5,797.96
32,422.53
17,772.27
(54,545.70)
(14,607.80)
139,512.35
29,353.11
254, 378.75
2,718.23
14,889.16
25,456.66
(491.11)
1, 240, 000.84
City of National City
Pooled Investment Transactions Report
For the Month of July 1997
Date Description Institution Ref. No. Amount
2 Withdrawal LAIF 799 (600,000.00))
7 Withdrawal LAIF 800 (400,000.00)
8 Withdrawal LAIF 801 (500,000.00)
17 Withdrawal LAIF 803 (200,000.00)
30 Withdrawal LAIF 804 (300,000.00)
07RECON.XLS Page 1
1 1 /18/97
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
November 25, 1997
MEETING DATE
AGENDA ITEM NO. 5
LATTI iVly LL AlL11YV J13I1Jlti V1VJlX.UUlUtCJ, ±JNL.
1 WGPONSIVE AND RESPONSIBLE BIDDER AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SHASTA CONSTRUCTORS, INC. FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
THE NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD BRIDGE AT OLD SWEETWATER RIVER CHANNEL, BRIDGE
NO. 57C-679, PROJECT NO. 5066(004) ENGINEERING SPECS NO 92-15
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
BERKUTI ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT
EXPLANATION
SEE ATTACHED REPORT
x
Environmental Review N/A
F, FinanuaL Sta enaent
�..g� a7R ICil7le from the following project accounts: 312-09-500-598-
6140 $500,000; 308-509-500-598-6101 $3,155,000; AND9-500�598-6101
$640,000
TM REC�OM_MENDATIO�y
Approve the Resolution
BOARD/ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
Account
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) 97-152
Resolution No.
-92-15
A.:CC i'P.e• ,/ACI
On October 21, 1997 at 11:00 a.m. the following seven (7) bids were received and publicly opened for the
project:
Bidders Bid Amount
1. Erreca's, Inc. $3,940,687.00
125 Slaughterhouse Canyon
Lakeside, CA 92040
2. Granite Construction Company $3,922,229.00
585 West Beach Street
Watsonville, CA 95077-5085
3. R.E. Hazard Contracting Company $3,779,321.50
6565 Marindustry Drive
San Diego, CA 92122
4. Shasta Constructors, Inc. $3,128,559.00
4150 Fig Tree Lane
Redding, CA 96002
5. Herzog Contracting Corp. $4,190,420.50
600 S. Riverside Road
St. Joseph, MO 64507
6. Scheidel Contracting and Engineering, Inc. $2,985,780.00
3025 Camino de las Piedras
El Cajon, CA 92019
7. Stimpel - Wiebelhans Associates $4,352,370.00
1170 Industrial Street
Redding, CA 96002
Engineers Estimate $2,861,738.00
DBE/WBE goal for the project was set to 15%.
1
Bid Analysis:
Extensive bid analysis was done on the three low bidders, taking into consideration the following factors:
1. Examination of the unit bid prices for the three lowest bidders indicates reasonable conformance with
the Engineer's estimated prices. The bid amount for the apparent low bidder (Scheidel Contracting and
Engineering, Inc.)* and the second low bidder (Shasta Constructors, Inc.) exceed the Engineer's estimate
by 4% and 9% respectively. Deviations from the Engineer's estimate on major items were found to be
consistent among the three low bidders, which indicates the current market conditions.
* If item no. 37 is adjusted to $80,000 (see the Recommendation Section of this report)
2. Number and distribution of the bids and the geographic location of the bidders indicate that the
competition was fair. However, six bids are within 5% to 46% of the apparent low bid*, and within 21%
to 39% of the second low bid, if the apparent low bid is rejected.
* If item no. 37 is adjusted to $80,000 (see the Recommendation Section of this report)
3. Except for Item No.37 of Scheidel Contracting and Engineering, Inc., all of the three low bidders were
found to have mathematically and materially balanced bids.
Based on the current market conditions, workloads, existing deteriorated condition of the bridge, and
environmental and site access constraints we believe that there will be no potential savings if the project is
readvertised.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that the contract be awarded to the second lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Shasta
Constructors, Inc. based upon the following justifications:
1. The apparent low bidder, Scheidel contracting and Engineering, Inc. had the following consequential
irregularities that made their bid a non -responsive bid:
A. The project specifications state that "in the event of a variation between the unit price and
extended total, the unit price and the corrected extension will be considered as the amount bid".
The total bid amount in Scheidel's bid is $2,985,780.00. However adding the unit prices results
in a corrected total extension of $2,915,580.00 i.e. $70,200.00 less than the total indicated in the
bid. On October 22. 1997 Scheidel submitted a letter (copy attached) stating that a "clerical
mistake" was made in her Bid Item No. 37, however. the total in the bid was correct. She stated
that the Bid Item No. 37 should be S80,000 rather than $8,000.00. However, changing bid Item
No. 37 to S80,000 would result in a total bid of $2,987,500 which is $1,800 higher than the total
bid (S2.985,780.00) as submitted.
We believe that waving this irregularity will give Scheidel an unfair advantage - the opportunity
to withdraw their bid by invoking Public Contract Code Section 5103. - modify their bid which
2
was not available to the other bidders.
B. The apparent low bidder Scheidel Contructing and Enginering, Inc. did not follow the bidding
instructions. They did not submit a list of subcontractors in the proper form " Designation of
Subcontractors" on Page C7 of the project specifications. The subcontractors information was
submitted on a form called "Subcontracting Request" that was replaced by the "Local Agency
Bidder -DBE Information" form through Addendum No. 2. All of the bidders were required to
submit the "Local Agency Bidder -DBE Information" form.
2. The second low bidder, Shasta Constructors, Inc. has been found to be responsive and a responsible
bidder, and they are qualified to perform the work. They meet the project DBE goal.
3. Staff has consulted with Caltrans on the status of bids, and they concur with the staff's recommendations,
as long as the proper bid analysis has been performed, and documentation has been kept.
Financial Analysis:
The project is 80% funded by the Federal highway Administration and 20% by the City. The construction phase
obligation amount is $3,350,000 based on the following Engineer's Estimate:
Est. Bid Subtotal
Est. Supplemental Work
Project Subtotal
Plus Contingency (5%)
$2,835,018.00
$ 12,500.00
$2,850,518.00
$ 142,500.00
Total $2,993,018.00
Construction Engineering (12%) $ 350,000.00
Project Total Cost $3,343,018.00
Less Non -Participating Work $ 3,000.00
Total Participating Cost (Adjusted) $3,350,000.00
3
The awarding of the contract to Shasta Constructors will require the allocation of an additional $340,885.00
(10%) in funds, above the authorized amount based on the following calculations:
Bid Subtotal
Est. Supplemental Work
Project Subtotal
Plus Contingency (5%)
Total
Construction Engineering (12%)
Project Total Cost
Less Non -Participating Work
Total Participating Cost
$3,128,559.00
$ 12,500.00
$3,141,059.00
$ 157,053.00
$3,298,112.00
$ 395,773.00
$3,693,885.00
$ 3,000.00
$3,690,885.00
The additional funds required from the FHWA will be $272,708.00, while the city's additional share will be
$68,177.00. The City presently has sufficient additional funds to cover the additional costs.
Attachments:
-Bid Summary and Analysis for the three low bidders
-A letter from Scheidel Contracting and Engineering
4
BID ANALYSIS
PROJECT
BRIDGE NO
SPECIFICATION NO
CONSTRUCTION
51C 679
9215
OF NATIONAL
CITY BLVD.
BRIDGE
BID OPENING
10l21197{
- --
-- --
-----
ENGR'S ESTIMATE
SCHEIDEL
IF _ ITEM ITS -M DESCRIPTION
1
IMIT
[OTT
UNIT EXT (S)
UNIT
1 EXT.(S)
SHASTA
UNIT
RE. HAZARD
AVERUNIT AGE
NO CODE
I
PRICE IS)
PRICE
EXT.($)
UNIT
EXT (5)
EXT
I C06105 RESIDENT
($)
PRICE ($1
PRICE (5)
PRICE
2 066999
I
3,071301
ENGINEEH'SOFFICE
I CONSTRU CTION
STAKING
TEMPORARY FENCE
LS
LS
L5
LS
l5
- -
LS
-
53000000
--- -'---
10,000.00
-'--'---
LS
- -_-
LS
--------
25000.00
- ------
22,000.00
LS
IS
40,000 00
7,500.00
LS
LS
29.00000
15000.00
LS
31,333.33
4,120030
(ESA)
CONSTRUCTION
M
403
-
5000
-- --
20,00000
- ---' -
1200
-----
4,800.00
- ---
1000
400000
1100
440000
LS
14.833.33
IS{
5 120100
AREA SIGNS
TRAFFIC CONTROL-----_-
LS
LS
LS
10.00000
LS
10,00000
LS
7,500.00
LS
8000 D0
11.00
LS
4,400.00
151
6 120120
1 120162
SYSTEM
TYPE III BARRICADE
IEMF'OHARY
L5
EA
LS
20
LS
7000
2500.0.0
-
140000
LS
-100- -
00
25,000.00
-___---'
2,00000
LS
---
100.00
12,00000
200D.DD
LS
14000
20000.00
2.80000
3S
111J3
8.500.00
1 00
ISI
8128501151
9 129000
PAIN 1Eo TRAFFIC
STRIFE
TEMPORARY SIGNAL
SYSTEM
TEMPORARY RAILING
LM
LS
2300
_--
LS
I65
LS
---
3,795 00
---
11,000 00
- -'-
IA0
LS
-----
3,220.00
7,90000
1.50
LS
3,45000
10,00000
450
LS
-.
10.35000
1500000
2.17
2,2,2fi60067fi7
5,67333
10 126100
II 1506-62
(TYPE 1()
1EMPORARY CRASH
CUSNON MODULE
REMOVE METAL
M
-
EA
440
-
24
2500
- --
25000
-- -
1100000
- --
8000. 00
- - --
33.00
-- --
250.00
14,520.00
8.000.00
2 50.00
200.00
22,000.00
-__
4,800.00
2500
35000
1100000
8.400.00
LS
36.00
10,9fi6.67
15,84000
12 150110
BEAM GUARD
RAILING
REMOVE TRAFFIC
M
04
2200
- --
1.948 00
-- ------
1200
-------
1,008.00
15.00
1.26D.00
70.00
5,880
26667
8,400.00
- - ---
150142
5TIC E
OVE ROADSIDE
M
2025
2OD
-
4050.0D
-'-- -
4.70
----------
9,517.50
__
1.20
8,50500
500
00
10,12500
32.J3
2,718.00
14 151531
SIGN
RECONSTRUCT
EA
5
5000
-
250.00
-- -
10000.
500.00
5000
25000
12500
62500
4.63
936250
I
15152320
FENCE
NESET ROADSIDE
M
15
4000
--
60000
--
9000
--
1,350.00
----
9500
1425.00
4400
66000
91.67
45833
16 152601
11153210
SIGN
MODIFY DRAINAGE
STRIIC TOES
REMOVE CONCRETE
EA
EA
Ml
4
1
170 00
- -
1,20000
680 00
- -
120000
15000
--- ---
2,500.00
600.00
-----__
2,500.00
_.
150.00
1250.00
600 00
125000
200 CO
2600.00
800 00
2,80000
76.33
166.67
111500
66667
1 157550
BADGE REMOVAL
LS
40
LS
6500
2 600 00
6000
2.40000
-----
50.00
2000.00
360
00 W
2.1.83.33
156
2,113333
ISI 160101
201190101
CI FARING AND
GRUBBING
ROADW=Y
LS
-
LS
-
LS
-'
LS
---
2500000
-
1500.00
--
LS
---
LS
65,00000
----.--._
1,500.OD
LS
LS
100,00000
3,00000
CS
LS
LS
20,
120,00000
3,000. 00
67
- -
LS
950W.00
5,0000
{1 192003
IF)
'2 192020
ECAVA1ION
STRIICTIIRE
EXCAVA f10N
(BRIDGE{
STRUCTURE
M3
M3
1270
620
1500
-
1000
1605000
--
24.80000
-- -
20.00
- --
69.00
-
25,400.00 _
42.78000
2200
-
100.00
27.940.00
6200000
30.00
4000
38,10000
2180000
LS
24.00
69 fii
2,50000
30,180.03
-----
IF)
'3 152037
EXCAVATION (TYPE
C)
STRUCTURE
M3
660
4000
- --
27,800.00
6900
47,810.00
200.00
138,000.00
300.00
207000.00
- -
43,193-33
-- ---
IS)
4 193003
EXCAVATION
(RETAINING WALL)
STH UCTIIRE
M3
330
--
15 50
--'
4 95000
--'----
2000
6,80000
6000
19,80000
-----
2500
-------
6.25000
169.67
3500
130070.00
5 193013
BACKFILL{BRIDGE)
STRUCTURE
M3
350
---
3000
-- -
10.50000
- -----
26.00
----
9,100.00
-----
50.00
17,50000
12000
42,00000
65.33
11,550 00
(F)
6 200001
BACKFDt. (RETAINING
WAI1)
COASTAL SALT
Ml
260
--
2000
-- -
5,20000
- -
26.00
-'---
6.760.00
------
50.00
13,00a00
90.00
23,40000
-
5533
22066.67
---
A(S)
7 203016
MARSH MITIGATION
EROSION CONTROL
LS
L5
15
10000.00
LS
15,000.00
LS
50,000.00
LS
30000.00
14386. 67
(Si (I
8229101 I-INIS111NG
SPE DI
ROADWAY
HA
04
500000
2,00000
532500
2,130130 10,25000
4,100 00
1400000
5,600.00
LS
31666.67
9 2(0011 CE
BASE
CLASS
3.390101 ASPI
BENT TREATED
(PI ANT -MIXED,
A)
IAI.T CONCRETE
LS
M3
-
LS
505
LS
--
4500
- -
400000
--"--_-
22,7200
-- -5
LS
- ---
3500
- -----
4,000.00
---
17,875.00
LS
5100
5,000.00
25,755.00
LS
60.00
1000000
30,30000
9,85633
is
4867
394333
6,33333_
(TYPEO)
TORN
355
55 00
IS 52500
4800
16.33000
5900
20.94500
4100
1668500
24,576.67
5007
1796667
DIFF
BETWEEN
SCHEIDEL
8 ENGR'S
% DIFF.
BETWEEN
SHASTA
8 ENGR'S
% DIFF.
BETWEEN
HAZARD
8 ENGR'S
% DIFF.
BETWEEN
SHASTA
d SCHEID
% DIFF
BETWEEN
HAZARD
fl SCHEIDE
-17%
120%
-76%
0%
900%
43%
-15%
28%
32%
0%
-45%
135%
100%
125%
-12%
108%
-8%
160%
D%
33%
73%
73%
33%
-13%
30%
50%
7%
0%
-22%
.15%
33%
-25%
-80%
-25%
380%
43%
-9%
.9%
1D0%
20%
4%
23%
300%
100%
47%
150%
400%
300%
67%
150%
400%
105%
25%
13%
-3%
50%
-74%
.20%
700%
100%
173%
36%
0%
40%
218%
150%
150%
10%
18%
133%
454%
380%
100%
100%
0%
650%
67%
300%
350%
200%
180%
150%
33%
7%
-15%
60%
-66%
17%
-25%
-52%
0%
7%
27%
52%
-20%
25%
_11%
-50%
6%
0%
50%
-17%
54 %
100%
10%
45%
190%
200%
92%
92%
233%
92%
25%
46%
20%
16%
-32%
'8%
-20%
.20%
40%
221%
90%
-24%
40%
163%
6%
25%
-51%
33%
12%
500%
135%
100%
50%
-42%
335%
25%
362%
246%
100
163%
150%
71%
2%
UNIT PRICES
ENGR'S SCHIEDEL SHASTA R E HAZAE❑
530,000 00
10.000 00
50 00
10 000 00
2.500 00
70 00
1 65
5,600 00
2500
250 OD
22 00
2 00
5000
4000
170 00
I.200 00
65 00
25,00000
1.500 00
15 00
40 00
40 DO
1500
30 00
20 00
10.000 00
5,000 00
1,000 00
45 00
55 00
525 000 00
22,000 00
12 D0
10.000 00
25,000 00
100 00
140
7,900 00
33 D0
250 00
12 00
4 10
100 00
90 OD
150 00
250000
60 00
65,000 DO
500 00
20 00
69 DO
69 00
20 00
26 00
26 00
15,000 00
5,325 00
4,000 0D
3500
46 00
540 000 00
1,500 D0
10 D0
7.500 00
12,000 0a
100 00
1 50_
10 000 00
50 Do
200 00
15 00
4 20
50 00
95 0D
150 00
I.250 00
50 00
100,000 00
3,000 00
22 00
100 00
200 00
60 00
50 D0
50 00
50.000 00
10,250 00
5,000 D0
5100
5900
529 0G0 00
15. C00 00
11 00
8,000 00
20. 000 00
140 00
/ 50
15 000 D0
25 00
350 00
70 OD
5 D0
125 00
44 00
200 00
2.600 00
360 00
120 000 00
300000
30 00
40 00
300 00
25 Do
120 00
90 00
30,000 00
14 000 00
10 000 00
60 00
17 00
ERIDGEBID_ANALYSIS
Pass 1
ENGR'S
ESTIMATE
UNIT
SCHEIDEL
EXT (8)
SHASTA
UNIT
R
EXT ($)
E. HAZARD
UNIT
AVERAGE
%DIFF.
BETWEEN
%DIFF.
BETWEEN
SHASTA HAZARD
%DIFF.
BETWEEN
% DIFF
BETWEEN
SHASTA
%DIFF.
BETWEEN
UNIT PRICES
TE ITEM I DESCRIPTION
UNIT 'OTV
UNIT
EXT.(i)
EXT.(§)
UNIT EXT
SCHEIDEL
HAZARD
IRE
_ITEM
GO CODE T
PRICE
(5)
PRICE ($)
PRICE
(5)
PRICE ($)
PRICE
8
ENGR'S
8 ENGR'S &
ENGR'S
8 SCHEID
5 SCHEIDE
ENGR'S
SCHIEDEL
SHASTA IIAZAED
31 490696 FURNISH Pi( INC
: (CL A SS 900C)
M
2308
6000
13840000
4000
92,320.00
37.00
85,39000
37.00
85.39600
3800
07, 70400
-33%
-35%
- 36%
-0%
-a%
6000
4000
3700
1100
32 490697 CHIVE FILING (CLASS
(3) 900C)
EA
100
1.50000
194,400 00
1870.00
201,96000
1,850.00
199,500.00
250000
-
27000000
2,07333
223,92000
- -
4%
3%
39%
.1%
-
34%
180000
- -
187000 I
- -
185000
2 500 00
33 450(57
FURNISH PII.IN^u
-
(C(ASS 52SCI
M
1027
4500
45,21500
4000
41,06000
37.00
37999.00
3700
3799900
3800
39,02600
-11%
-18%
-18%
-8%
60%
4500
4000
3700
3700
34 .490/53
DRIVE PILE (CLASS
(5)
625C)
EA
56
180000
100/30000
187000
104,720.00
1,850.00
103,600 00
250000
14000000
2.07333
116.10687
4%
_ 3%
39%
-1%
34%
1 60000
1871300
185000
2 500 00
35 490159
FURNISH PILING
M
755
4000
30.20000
40.00
30,20000
37.00
27.93500
3700
27935.00
3000
28,69000
0%
-8%
-86e
-8%
•616
4000
4000
3700
3700
36 490760
DRIVE PILE (CLASS
151 400C)
EA
40
1.40000
56.000.00
1,870 00
74.80000
1,850.00
71300.00
2.500.00
100000.00
2.073.33
82,933.33
34%
32%
79%
-1%
34%
1,40003
167000
1850 00
2.50000
37'500001 PRESTRESSING CAST
,.IS) IN -PLACE CONCRETE
LS
LS
LS
8000000
LS
8,000.00
LS
68,50000
LS
85,00000
LS
53833.33
•90%
-14%
6%
756%
963%
LS
800000
613.500 00
5500000
38''510051 SIR(ICT 11RAL -
-
CONCRETE. BRIDGE
(I)
FOOTING
Ml
240
30000
72,00000
45000
100000.00
420.00
10080000
50000
120,000.00
45667
109,600.00
50%
40%
67%
.7%
11%
300 OD
45000
42000
50000
39 510053
STRUCTURAL
1(11
CONCRETE BRIDGE
M3
1754
40000
701.600 00
450.00
702,300.00
420.00
73688000
54000
947,16000
470.00
824,380 00
13%
5%
35%
-7%
20%
40000
45000
42000
54000
40'516060
ST RUC [1,9*1
CONCRETE
(1)
HE1A11101G WAI L
M3
93
30000
2790000
35600
3582800
420.00
38.050.00
47000
43,71000
425.33
3655600
29%
_ _ 40%
5794
9%
22%
30000
36600
12000
47000
411I
)510030 SIRCT) RAL
CONCRETE
IF)
APPROACH SLAB
M3
132
40000
5280000
420.00
55,440.00
420.00
55440.00
530.00
69960.00
45667
60.28000
__- 5%
5%
33%
0%
26%
40000
42000
42000
53000
42,510501
MINOR CONCRETE
5*3
35
50000
1750000
230.00
8,050.041
320,00
11200.00
47000
16.45000
34000
11.90000
-54%
-36%
-6%
39%
104%
50000
23000
32000
47300
4 ]510502
(MINOR CONCRETE
STRUCTURE)
M3
145
320000
17,40000
65000
12,32500
1,250.00
15.125.00
78000
11,310 00
96000
13,920.00
-29%
4%
-35%
47%
-0%
120000
85000
125000
78000
,(EI
44 511035
(1.1(7109
ARCHITECTURAL
I TREATMENT
M2
170
3500
595000
100.00
17000.00
6500
11,05000
4000
680000
6833
11,61667
156%
86%
-_--_ 14%
35%
-60%
3500
100.00
6500
40 OD
455110043
ANTI GRAFFITI
(5)
46 515128
COA ZING
JOINT SEAL
M2
400
2000
---
8,00000
1200
4,800.00
20.00
800000
1000
4,00000
1400
560000
-40%
0%
50%
67%
•17%
2000
1200
2000
- �-
1000
ASSEMBLY TYPE B
)*AR-TOOMN1
M
4e
60000
25.80000
20000
2600.00
40000
1920000
30000
14 400 00
30000
14,40000
.67%
-33%
-50%__..
100%
50%
600.00
20000
40000
30000
47 520102
BAR REINFORCING
STEEL
KG
319200
1. 20
353.04000
1.00
319200.00
0.80
280,09600
090
287,260 00
0.93
29579200
-17%
-27%
25%
-12%
-10%
1 20
100
088
000
48I1520163
(BRIDGE)
BAR REINFORCEING
IFI
STEEL
KG
6100
1 20
732000
1.44
6.704.00
1.05
11.28500
1.80
10,913000
1.70
10,34967
20%
54%
50%
28%
25%
1.20
1. 41
1 35
180
4 91 520110
BAR REINFORCING
STILL (EPDXY
GOATED)(BRIDGE)
KG
3750
220
625000
2.40.
9.00000
2.00
7500.00
970
6375.00
203
761500
9%
-9%
-23%
-(7%
•29%
220
240
200
1 70
50. 664095
600 MM BITUMINOUS
COATED
CORRHGATED STEEL
PIPE (I 62MM T I TICK)
M
22
20000
4,400 00
200.00
4,400.00
75.00
1650.00
20000
6.160.00
185.00
107000
0%
-63%
40%
-63%
40%
20000
200.00
7500
25000
5I
664103
750MM BITUMINOUS
CORRUGATED STEEL
P,PE (I 62MM 1H101<)
IA
9
21900
2,43000
30000
2,700.0D
100.00
900.00
30000
2 700 00
23333
2,100.00
11%
•63%
11%
-67%
0%
27000
30000
10000
30000
5Ie
703541 A
305MM WE( OLD
S1 EEL PIPE CASING,
BRIDGE (3 40MM
50000
THICK)
M
24
LS
8300.00
20000
4,50000
10000
2.40000
500.00
12,00000
266.67
6,400.00
-40%
-70%
50%
.50%
150%
800000
20000
10000
52
721009
ROCK SLOPE
PROTECTION
7000
5000
MET110D B)
M3
140
5500
770000
60.00
6400.00
7000
960000
5000
100000
6000
8,40000
0%
27%
_9%
17%
_17%
5500
6000
53
721024
(FACING
ROCK SLOPE
PROTECTION DAT.
52,800,00
7000
61,600.00
17%
7000
10000
AIE T HOD BI
M3
B80
6000
52,80000
6000
10000
8800000
7667
67,466.67
0%
17%
67%
67%
6000
60.00
54
/2900I
FILTER FABRIC
(HOCK SI OPE
300
PROTECTION)
M2
925
250
231250
270
2,497.50
3.00
2,77500
11.00
10.17500
5.57
5.149.17
8%
20%
340%
11%
307%
1.50
270
11.00
55
750001
M•SCEL.IANEOUS
300
500
400
175
56
(A) IRON AND STEEL
750501 MISCELLANEOUS
KG
330
300
990.00
500
1,550.00
4.00
1,320.00
1.75
577.50
3.50
1.152.50
67%
�-
33%
-
_42%
-20%
-05%
_--
-
600
-.
000
.
1000
300
(1) MLTAL. (BRIDGE)
5/ 633090 TIIBIIIAR
KG
800
-
600
480000
-
9.00.
7,200.00
1000
0,00000
-
300
240000
--
733
5,66867
50%
67%
-50%
_
11%
.57%
70%
24500
25S00
T.:I 11410131031NG
M
315
10000
31,50000
15000
4725000
24500
77,17500
25500
80,32500
21667
58 250 00
50%
145%
155%
63%
10000
15000
2/000
35000
581816140 CLiNC RL IL IJARRILH
M
205
29000
7085000
35000
100.700.00.
24000
03,60000
35000
92,75000
32333
6566333
31%
•17%
21%
-37%
-8"4
29000
30000
50.8I1141 COHC RE IL BARRIER
25000
35000
( 0 01'1. 26A)
IA
50
13000
6.50000
38000
1900000
25000
12.50000
35000
17.50000
32657
16,33333_
192%
92%
169%
-34%
-8%
13000
38000
BRIDGEBI0_ANALYSIS
Pane
ENGR'S ESTIMATE
UNIT
I EXT(S)
SCHEIDEL
UNIT
SHASTA
EXT (5)
RE HAZARD
AVERAGE
IIITEM ITEM DE SCRIPTION UNIT OTY
NOCODE
50 440515 THERI.IOPI AS TIC
T EXT.(5)
UNIT
PRICE (S)
PRICE (5)1
PRICE (5)
UNIT
PRICE I51
1 EXT (5)
UNIT
PRICE
EXT
Is) IAVEMI-NT MARKING
01 64U656 PAINT TRAFFIC
M2
15
4000
-
60000
-'
76.00
1,170. 00
-----------
60.00
----_
1020.00
8000
1,200.00
75.33
1,13000
ISI STRIPE 12 50001)
62 850102 PAVEMENT MARKER
M
2350
035
82250
1.50
3,52500
1.50
3525.00
5.00
_ -
1175000
267
6,26667
113) (NLFI EC TI 0E)
63380351 SIGNAIII OCA TION 1)
EA
220
270
-
60500
----
500
-------
1,100.00
5.00
1,10000
4.50
99000
4.83
1,06333
.
ISI
64 360352 SIGNAL (LOCATION 2)
IS
LS
LS
-
4500000
-- -
LS
- --
47000.00
------
LS
40.79000
LS
45.00000
LS
14,263 33
_
IA)
65 860402 LIGFI IING (CITY
LS
LS
-
LS
-
21.00000
-- -'-
LS
--
12,850.00
-----
LS
11175.00
LS
1500000
LS
13.008.33
35,860.00
_-----
LS
31,183.OD
276;00000-
IS)
6fi
6 I099990
2040,'3
STREET)
MOBIL ICAT ION 10%
PI ALIT
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
3500000
26000000
LS
LS
LS
__.LS
35 000 00
JT➢000.00
LS
LS
34,014.33
272,00000
270,W000
LS
I
ES I AEI ISIOAENT
LS
LS
LS
10,000.00
LS
4,000.00
LS
10,00000
LS
3.5,000.00
LS
16.333.33_
CALCULATED TOTAL
TOTAL AS BID
--
- -
2,861,738.00
-1 -
3779,.50
-
---
-
--- - -
2,B15,580.00
7,128,55900
2 66738 0'0
2,985,780.00
3.128.55900
3,.779 321321.50
--. -
--_-_
--_.
DISCREP
ENCY
(70,200.00)
(2,664 00)
% DIFF.
BETWEEN
SCHEIDEL
& ENGR'S
95%
329%
82%
4%
-39%
2%
-18%
-60%
2%
4%
% DIFF.
BETWEEN
SHASTA
&ENGRS
70%
329%
82%
•9%
47%
-11%
•1%
0%
9%
9%
% DIFF
BETWEEN
HAZARD
& ENGR'S
100%
1329%
64%
0%
-29 %
0%
11%
250%
32%
32%
% DIFF
BETWEEN_
SHASTA
& SCHEID
•13%
0%
0%
-13%
_13%
-13%
20%
150%
7%
5%
% DIFF
BETWEEN
HAZARD
& SCIIEIDE
3%
233%
UNIT PRICES
ENGR'S SCHIEDEL SHASTA R E HAlAED
40 00
0 35
-10% 275
•4% 45 000 00
17% 21,000 00
_ -2%
35%
775%
30%
27%
35 000 00
280,000 00
10. 000 00
78 00
1 SO
5 00
17,000 00
12,85000
35060 00
230000 00
4000 00
6600
1 50
5 00
40790 00
1117500
31,183 00
276.000 00
10 000 00
80 00
5 00
4 50
45.000 00
15 000 00
35.000 00
310 000 00
35. 000 00
BRIDGEBID_ANALYSIS
Page 3
SCHEIDEL
CONTRACTING AND ENGINEERING, INC.
P.O. BOX 1796
LA MESA, CALIFORNIA 91944-1796
October 22, 1997
LICENSE NO.730583 TELEPHONE - FACSIMILE
(619)593-8704 - (619)593-9193
City of National City
Office of the City Clerk
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950
Ref: Construction of National City Blvd. Bridge at Old
Sweetwater River Channel, Bridge No. 57C-679, Project
No. BRLS-5066(004)
Dear Sir:
Please be advised that a clerical mistake was made in our bid for the National City
Boulevard Bridge. The bottom line of $2,987,580.00 is correct. However Bid Item
No. 37 (Prestressing Cast in Place Concrete) the lump sum price of $8,000.00 should
be $80,000.00. This mistake was made during the transfer of bid prices from the
computer sheet to the bid page.
The low Subcontractor, AVAR Construction Systems, Inc., bid $69,700.00 for this
bid item. This sub -bid was marked up 15% which made it $80,155.00 and rounded
down to $80,000.00. The $80,000.00 appears on the computer sheet, consequently
the bottom line is correct on the bid. The sub -bid price can further be verified by
reviewing the Subcontracting Request submitted at the time of bid.
The $72,000.00 difference materially makes our bid different than we intended it to
be. Our bid is the bottom line of $2,987,580.00, not $2,987,580.00 - $72,000.00
= $2,915,580.00. We bid this project very tight and a $72,000.00 cut in the bottom
line will make our position untenable. Please advise us in writing of your actions on
the above matter.
Also, enclosed is the required Bidder -DBE Information forms.
Sincerely,
Carolyn E. Scheid\ I
President
CES/ss
cc: Cameron Berkuti
RESOLUTION NO. 97- 152
RESOLUTION OF 1'HE CITY COUNCIL OF 1'HE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DECLARING SHASTA
CONSTRUCTORS, INC. TO BE THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE,
RESPONSIBLE BIDDER, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SHASTA CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NATIONAL CITY
BOULEVARD BRIDGE AT OLD SWEETWATER RIVER
CHANNEL, BRIDGE NO. 57C-679, PROJECT NO. 5066(004)
ENGINEERING SPECS NO. 92-15
WHEREAS, the Engineering Department of the City of National City did in
open session, on October 21, 1997 publicly open, examine and declare all sealed bids for the
construction of the National City Boulevard bridge at Old Sweetwater River Channel.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of National City hereby awards the contract for the construction of the National City
Boulevard bridge at Old Sweetwater River Channel to the lowest responsive, responsible
bidder, to wit:
SHASTA CONSTRACTORS, INC.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National
City, California that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City, a
contract between Shasta Contractors, Inc. and the City of National City to provide for the
construction of the National City Boulevard bridge at Old Sweetwater River Channel. Said
agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 25th day of November, 1997.
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
g
George H. Waters, Mayor
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE Novembe /5, 11997
AGENDA ITEM NO 6
ITEM TITLE CONSIDER SCHEDULING CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION OF
VOLUNTARY COMPAIGN EXPENDITURE LIMITS UNDER PROPOSITION 208
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION
George H. Eiser, III
DEPARTMENT
City Attorney
This subject was last considered at the Council meeting of October 21, 1997. At that time, the
Council continued the mater to a workshop to be held the first week in December.
It is suggested that the workshop be scheduled for 2:00 p.m. on December 2, prior to the 3:00 p.m.
City Council meeting.
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No.
TAFF RECOMMENDATION
Schedule workshop.
BOARD/ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
Agenda material from October 21, 1997 meeting
San Diego Union Tribune article concerning court challenge to Proposition 208
A-2CO Rev ,f2:'
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE October 21, 1997 AGENDA ITEM NO 10
7- ITEM TITLE
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION
VOLUNTARY CAMPAIGN EXPE*IDITURB LIMITS UNDER PROPOSITION 208
George H. Eiser, III
See attached memorandum
DEPARTMENT City Attorney
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
X
N/A
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Direct staff concerning possible preparation of ordinance.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No
Memorandum
1
City of National City
Office of the City Attorney
1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950
George H. Eiser, III • City Attorney
(619) 326-4220 FAX (619) 336-4327 TOO (619) 336-1615
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: October 16, 1997
FROM: City Attorney
SUBJECT: Voluntary Campaign Expenditure Limits Under Proposition 208
Proposition 208 was approved by the voters at the November 5, 1996 election, effective
January 1, 1997. December, prior to Proposition 208 taldng effect, I distributed the
at -.ached memorandum summarizing its provisions.
Proposition 208 applies to every campai$i for state and local office in California. With very
few exceptions (mostly related to slate mailers and disclosure of the sponsors of
ad`er_is:meats), Proposition 208 dots not apply to ballot measure calripaai_^_.s. For cites, this
means that Proposition 208 will likely not apply to recall elections, because they have been
held to be ballot measure elections. However, Proposition 208 will apply 0 campaiz:s for
candidates to replace officials subject to a recall. I. Also, most of Proposition 208 will not apply
to local tax elections, which may become more prevalent after the passage of Proposition 218.
An issue which was discussed on page three of my memorandum, but which has not ye: been
determined by the City Council, is that of the voluntary expenditure lit„its authorized by
Proposition 208. Proposition 208 does not rewire that expenditure limits be esablished, but
permits cities to establish voluntcry expenditure ceilings of up to Si or less per resident for
each election in the city. A higher expenditure limitation may also be established, but only by
voter approval.
If the City Council adopts a voluntary expenditure ceiling, candidates must rile with the FPPC
a statement of acceptance or re;ecdon of the ceiling before accepting any contributions. (With
ce7ain exceptions, candidates may not accept contributions more than six (6) months prior to
an election). If a candidate accepts the expenditure c: iiing, he/she is subjec: to a contributor-1
limitation or S2 0 per contributor (i.e., individual, ousiness, union, PAC) per election, rater
than SiC0 cony:butor per
per
election as esrabiisned by Proposition 208. In the rase contributor commirtet 'rof a
> the contribution limitation is increased from 3C„d to 00 per
cont_ ibutor per election, `
Ca,C^�� year. ilL:CL'� ' 4.Clt[`S CO a '�.:.P.G�.'L�.1rC 1L•' i].^.�:'.e� :0 .�:l.�i per
if a c3nl.;,-i Ce
.=' T,i:-s irde nr.leor -"pendin:res of Si.iTO or more ep+using �r
supoorn_mg a c a.ndid:te• Me. commi , - may nor accept any cony^:bucon in excess of 5250 cones autars m lid ^ per election. -,he
po csi parry comsi: ees are umit:.d o 55.000 per calendaryear. These
cone ibunon limita cns would not be affected by imposition of an crpecdicure ceiling.
October 16, 1997
Page Two
If the City Council adopts voluntary expenditure limits, Proposition 208 requires that local
election officials designate on the ballot, in the ballot pamphlet, and in the sample ballot,
which candidates have accepted the voluntary expenditure Iimits.
Once a candidate who does not arc pt the expenditure ceiling raises or spends 75% of the
recommended expenditure ceiling for that office, the voluntary expenditure ceiling for other
candidates in the same race will automatically triple. If an independent expenditure committee
or committees in the aggregate spend 50% or more of the applicable expenditure ceiling in
support of or in opposition to any candidate, the other candidates' voluntary expenditure
ceiling automatically triples. If an independent expenditure committee or committees in the
aggregate spend 25% or more of the applicable expenditure ceiling in support of or in
opposition to any candidate, the other candidates' voluntary expenditure ceiling automatically
doubles.
The total aggregate amount a candidate may receive from entities, other individuals, small
contributor committees, and political party committees is limited to 25% of the voluntary
expenditure limit. Likewise, no more than 25% of the voluntary expenditure limit shall be
accepted in cumulative contributions for any election from all political parry committees.
It is unclear what the consequences are when a candidate accepts voluntary expenditure
limitations but then breaks the agreement. It would appear that this would constitute a
violation of the Political Reform Act; however, applying the Act's penalties would convert a
"voluntary" ceiling to a "mandatory" ceiling.
In the 1976 landmark case of Buckley v. Valeo, the United States Supreme Court held that
mandatory expenditure limits unconstitutionally impair the free speech rights of candidates
and contributors. However, the court also held that voluntary expenditure Iimits, when
accompanied by a government benefit such as public matching funds, are constitutional.
Because Pr2oposition 208 does not require matching funds, it is not clear whether the fact that
any expenditure limits are voluntary would alone render its provisions defensible against a
constitutional challenge. Proposition 208 attempts to overcome this potential problem with
constitutionality with other less costly incentives, discussed above.
In the case of candidates for state office who comply with the voluntary ceilings. Proposition
208 requires election officials to print candidates' statements in the sample ballot for free.
That requirement does not apply to local jurisdictions, apparently to avoid imposing an
unfunded State mandate. The absence of that incentive in local campaigns, however, makes
local voluntary expenditure limits somewhat more vulnerable to constitutional challenge.
Therefore, if the City Council intends to impose a voluntary expenditure ceiling, the Council
may wish to consider providing the additional incentive of printing candidates' statements at
no cost for candidates who agree to accept the voluntary expenditure limit.
It is not certain that these expenditure limits apply to local (e.g. city) offices.
October 16, 1997
Page Three
Lastly, in considering whether to impose voluntary expenditure limits, the following
contribution limits, already imposed by Proposition 208, should be kept in mind. These
limits are in effect whether or not voluntary expenditure limits are enacted.
a. Ban on Transfers Between Candidates: Candidates and their
controlled committees may not make any contribution of campaign funds to any
other candidate running for office or to the other candidate's controlled
committee. A candidate may contribute personal funds to his or her own
campaign in unlimited amounts, or to another candidate subject to applicable
contribution limits.
b. Limits on Members of Appointed Boards and Commissions:
Appointees to boards and commissions may not contribute to, or solicit or
accept any contribution for, the person who made the appointment to that
office. This means, for example, that Planning Commissioners are prohibited
from contributing to or raising funds on behalf of the councilmembers who
made the appointment.
c. Ban on Lobbyists' Contributions: Candidates and officeholders may
not accept contributions from any registered state or local lobbyists if that
lobbyist finances, is engaged in, or is authorized to lobby the governmental
agency of the office being sought.
d. Time Limits on Campaign Fund Raising: Candidates in jurisdictions
with fewer than 1,000,000 residents may solicit and accept contributions only
during the period between six (6) months prior to the election and 90 days after
the election. Post -election contributions may be raised only if the campaign has
outstanding debt.
e. Limits on Loans to Campaigns: Every loan and extension of credit to
a candidate or committee will be considered a contribution from the maker of
the loan and is subject to all contribution limits. A candidate may loan his or
her personal funds to the candidate's campaign committee up to a limit of
S20,000 in outstanding loans at any one time.
f. Limits on Surplus Funds: Funds remaining in a campaign account at
the end of an election may not be carried -over for a subsequent election.
Within 90 days after the election, candidates must dispose of their remaining
funds by either returning the funds to contributors pro-rata, donating the funds
to a political party, or turning the funds over to the General Fund. Successful
candidates may transfer up to S10,000 to an officeholder fund for payment of
the expenses of communicating with constituents or carrying -out the official's
duties.
October 16, 1997
Page Four
If the City Council decides to impose voluntary expenditure limits, an implementation
ordinance will be prepared and submitted for Council approval at a future meeting.
GHE/gzno
Attachment
e\\Propzas.da
0(/).gr:
GEORGE H. FT.SER, III
City Attorney
City of National City
Office of the City Attorney
1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950
George H. Eiser, III • City Attorney
(619) 336-4220 FAX (619) 336-4327 TOO (619) 336-1615
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: December 17, 1996
FROM: City Attorney
SUBJECT: Proposition 208; California Political Reform Act of 1996
BACKGROUND
As you know, Proposition 208 was approved by the voters at the November 5, 1996
election. Proposition 208, which takes effect January 1, 1997, amends the Political
Reform Act (Government Code Section 81000 et se;") to add new contribution and
spending limits for local office holders, to revise disclosure requirements for contributions
and expenditures, and to expand the penalty provisions of the Act.
Following is a summary of the major provisions of these amendments. All statutory
references are to the Government Code.
LIMITATIONS ON CONTRIBUTIONS
Section 85301 limits contributions to a candidate for local office in a jurisdiction with
fewer than 100,00 residents to S 100 per contributor per election, and imposes a
contribution limit of S250 for candidates in jurisdictions of 100,000 or more residents.
Generally, contributions to a committee that contributes to a candidate are limited to S500
per calendar year. These limitations do not apply to a candidate's contribution of his or
her personal funds to his or her own campaign committee; they do apply to contributions
from a spouse.
Section 85302 provides that the contribution limit for "small contributor committees" is
two times the limit set forth in Section 85301. Pursuant to Section 85203, a "small
contributor committee" means any committee which meets the following criteria:
(a) It has a membership of at Ieast 100 individuals.
(b) All the contributions it receives from any person in a calendar year
total fifty dollars (550) er less.
(c) It has been in existence at least six months.
(d) It is not a candidate -controlled committee.
December 17, 1996
Page 2
Section 85306 prohibits a candidate from making a contribution to any other candidate.
However, a candidate may make a contribution of his or her personal finds to his or her
own candidacy or to the candidacy of any other candidate for office.
Section 85307 provides that a candidate may not personally male- a Ican of more than
S20,000 to his or her campaign or campaign committee, but may make unlimited
contributions to his or her own campaign.
Section 85311 provides that a contribution made by a business entity, I_bor organization,
association, political party or other group of persons shall be considered to be made by
a single person.
Section 85313 permits an elected officer to establish an "officeholder e.xoense fund" for
expenses relating to assisting, serving or communicating with condiments, or with
carrying out the official duties of the elected officer, provided aggregate contributions to
such a fund do not exceed 310,000 within any calendar year and that the expenditures are
not made in connection with any campaign for elective office er ballot :measure. Section
85313 prohibits a person from making contributions totaling more than S250 during a
calendar year. Cont;ibutiens to an officeholder account are not considered campaign
contributions. Contributions from a lobbyist are prohibited if the lobbyist is authorized
;l aage
to e in lobbying the governmental agency of the officeholder. Seonon 85313
requires that all expenditures from and contributions to the or-ce :elder account are
subject to campaign disclosure and reporting requirements of the .-.o,. Lastly, all funds
remaining in an officeholder account when the officer leaves office are to be turned over
to the state General Fund.
TIMING OF CONTRIBUTIONS
Section 85305 provides that in jurisdictions of fewer than 1,000,000 residents, candidates
may not accept contributions more than six months prior to an election. The time limit
for accepting contributions is 12 months in jurisdictions of 1,000,000 Cr more residents.
Further, Section 85305 provides that no candidate shall accept ccno budons more than
90 days after the election. Contributions accepted up to 90 days a .er the election shall
be used only to pay outstanding bills or debts owed by the candidate or the candidate's
controlled committee. Exceptions are provided for retiring debts inc red with respect
to an election held prior to January 1, 1997 if certain criteria are me:. and for payment
of attorney's fees arising out of alleged election law violations, for payment of fines or
assessments for violations of the Act, far payment of expenses for recounts or election
contests, for costs of external audits and for tax liabilities. Under Sec ion 89519, any
campaign funds remaining in excess of expenses incurred for the campaign are considered
surplus funds, and may be deposited in the amcunt of up to 510,000 in the officeholder
December 17, 1996
Page 3
account, with any remaining surplus distributed to any political party, returned to
contributors, or turned over to the state General Fund.
VOLUNTARY EXPENDI-ITJRE CEILINGS
Section 85400 provides that a municipality may establish voluntary expenditure ceilings
for candidates at 51.00 or less per resident.
Section 85401 provides that each candidate shall file a statement of acceptance or
rejection of the voluntary expenditure ceiling before accepting any contributions. If the
candidate accepts the expenditure ceiling, the candidate is subject to a contribution
limitation of 5250 in a jurisdiction with fewer than 100,000 residents, and S500 in a
jurisdiction of 100,000 or more residents. If a candidate declines to accept the
expenditure ceiling, his or her contributions are subject to the limitation of Section 85301.
Section 85404 provides that if a candidate declines to accept voluntary expenditure
ceilings and receives contributions, has cash on hand, or makes qualified expenditures
equal to 75 percent or more of the recommended expenditure ceiling for that office, the
voluntary expenditure ceiling shall then be three times the amount of the established
expenditure ceiling. Similar provisions apply to expenditures by political party
committees and by independent expenditure committees.
INDEPENDENT EXPEND I'IiJRES
Section 85500 provides that any committee that makes independent expenditures of more
than 51,000 in support of or in opposition to any candidate shall notify the filing officer
and all candidates running for the same seat by facsimile transmission or overnight
delivery each time this threshold is met. Any committee that makes independent
expenditures of S1,000 or more supporting or approving a candidate shall not accept any
contribution in excess of 3250 per election. Any contributor that makes a contribution
of 3100 or more per election to a candidate for elective office shall be considered to be
acting in cancer: with that candidate and shall not make independent expenditures and
contributions which in combination exceed the amounts set forth in Section 85301 in
support of that candidate or in opposition to that candidate's opponent or opponents.
ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTION REOLTREMENTS
Section 85 700 prohibits a contribution of 5100 cr more into a campaign chec'.dng account
unless the name, address, occupation and employer of the contributor is on file in the
records of the recipient of the contribution.
December 17, 1996
Page 4
Section 85701 provides that any person who accepts a contribution which is not from the
person listed on the check or subsequent campaign disclosure statement shall be liable to
pay the state the entire amount of the laundered contribution.
Section 85702 provides that with certain exceptions, contributions made directly or
indirectly to or on behalf of a particular candidate through an intermediary or conduit
shall be treated as connibutions from the contributor and the intermediary or conduit to
the candidate for purposes of the limitation of Section 85700.
Section 85703 provides that no person shall make and no person, other than a candidate
or the candidate's controlled committee, shall accept any contribution on the condition
or with the agreement that it will be contributed to any particular candidate. Tne
expenditure of funds received by a person shall be made at the sole discretion of the
recipient person.
Section 85704 provides that no elected officeholder, candidate, or the candidate's
controlled committee may solicit or accept a campaign conL bution or contribution to an
officeholder account from, through, or arranged by a registered state or iocal lobbyist if
that lobbyist finances, engages, or is authorized to engage in lobbying the governmental
agency for which the candidate is seeking election or the gove_rmental agency of the
officeholder.
Section 85 706 provides that the governing body of a local jurisdiction may impose lower
contribution limitations, and more stringent disclosures or prohibitions, than those set
forth in the Act. A local jurisdiction may establish higher contribution or expenditure
limitations, but only by a vote of the people.
DISCLOSURE
Section 84201 establishes a threshold of S 100 for contributions and expenditures required
to be reported in campaign statements.
Under Section 85305.5, a slate mailer organization or committee formed to support a
ballot measure must include the name, street address, and city of the slate mailer
organization or committee on the outside of each piece of slate mail and on every insert
within each piece of slate mail.
.ADVERTIS LN1ENTi'S
Section 34501 defines "advertisement" as any general or public advertisement which is
authorized and paid for by a person or committee for the purpose of supporting or
•
December 17, 1996
Page 5
opposing a candidate for elective office or a ballot measure(s). "Advertisement" does not
include a communication from an organization other than a political party to its mernbers,
a campaign button smaller than 10 inches in diameter, a bumper sticker smaller than 60
square inches, or other advertisement as determined by regulations of the FPPC.
Section 84503 requires any advertisement for or against any ballot measure to include a
disclosure statement identifying any person whose cumulative contributions are S50,000
or more.
ENFORCEMENT
Section 83116 increases the maximum penalty for violation of the Political Reform Act
from 52500 to S5000.
Under Section 83116.5, criminal as well as civil penalties maybe pursued against those
who purposely or negligently cause violations by another.
C ONCL SION
Undoubtedly, many of the provisions of Proposition 208 will be interpreted and clarified
by the courts and through the adoption of administrative regulations by the FPPC. In the
short term, should any questions arise as to the application of these provisions to specific
situations, I am available for discussion.
GEORGE Imo. EISER, lll
City Attorney
GHQ/sbc
cc: City Manager
SAN DIEGO UNION TRIBUNE
Wednesday, Nov. 5, 1997
iklverturn
jamp aign
limit
iositrion 208
restricting
'ee politica speec
ill Ainsworth
•wearer
u,SACRAMENTO-".U.S. District
Judge Lawrence Kariton sug-
..gested 'yesterday''that he would
tttsow out campaign ' contribution
lifts approved. by voters last year
b;?cause they are 'So restrictive they
vklfate a candidate's right to free
p ,litical speech:
:Marlton said, there was a "sub-
stantial chance" that he would de-
cia'-e that the limits are so low that
tijey prevent a candidate from ef-
fat ively communicating with" vot-
- ' His comments were made during
the closing arguments of a constitu-
tional challenge to Proposition 208 -
by political parties, candidates,
some interest groups and operators
of slate mailers.
The federal judge's statement
boosted the hopes of Proposition
2.0$'s opponents. They argue that
in !populous California;: the restric-
tions significantly reduce a candi-
date's political speech and severely
harm the democratic process.
' l3is decision , isn't expected for
twa or three months. In the mean-
' tune, the measure will stay in place.
Under: Proposition 208, candi-
d'ates 'miming for statewide office
' taro accept individual contributions
bf $500 per election, or $1,000 per
e1ection.if they agree. to accept vol-.
iintary spending. limits. Legislative
t candidates can accept -donations of
i up•to $250„or $500 if they agree to
the. spending caps_-
g;t}xe,_«three week #dal: op
t
pfinonts hip -tight in polite: _experts "-
�,bo,tiesufied:that.the contnbution
Ny1s.niake tinesrlyrimpo'ssible for
candidates.toiraise: ei%ugh money:
��,. ..
o exp]ain _their positionsto voters.
limits;'they argued,' will not
anew candidates to amass the funds
fit*s_ ty ,to. send enough mail or
•dease enough television and ra-
igads
,'-KPolitical, consultants also said-
tiat the limits would make it espe-
cialiy difficult for challengers to get
name! out to voters in, the
I.roposition 208, sponsored by
C"ajifornia Common Cause and the
Lague ofWoinen Voters, was in
thied to purify the political pro-
cesS_by reducing theamount of
indney in politics. California voters
approved the initiative last Novem-
ber 61 percent to 39 percent
- :The measure places limits on the
"amount of donations that political
action committees, individuals and
• political parties can contribute to
candidates. It also bans fund-raising
fot.;lengthy periods of time, prohib-
it lobbyists :from contributing to
lawmakers they are .paid to influ-
eire and "bars transfers between
ta`niiidates — a tool legislative
leaders use to amass tremendous
power.
grad Phillips, an attorney repre-
se ing initiative backers, argued
that the federal court should pre-
sefte the contribution limits be-
capse they serve the important goal
'of ;,preventing corruption or the ap-
pearance of corruption."
•oponents of Proposition 208
breve that requiring politicians to
' Seach . for-' money_- in,.: smaller
"amounts will force them to talk to
moke average voters and spend less
Belle with representatives of pow-
' erfif l special. interests. . '
!ut federal judges in at least two
ores "states — Missouri'and Ar-
ltasas = have tossed out contribu-
tied limits that they found too low
to ' practical. _
ven years ago, Karlton threw
' out'Proposition 73, the last major
'campaign finance reform measure
approved by voters, on the grounds
thaf its contribution limits favored
ificimbents. During closing argu-
rrients yesterday, Karlton took an
active role, peppering attorneys
with questions and sometimes
standing behind his rhair
• Even if Karlton invalidates parts
'of Proposition 208; the rest of the
initiative and its complicated regu-
' tatio' ns might still be allowed to take
c++S.,�6�i. •raj YCfhiyr 'f;::J•
.
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE November 25, 1997
7
AGENDA ITEM NO
ITEM TITLE
Proposed National City Public Library expenditure plan
describing projects and services for which sales tax revenues
may be expended.
PREPARED BY Anne Campbell
DEPARTMENT Library
EXPLANATION At the September 16 City Council meeting, the Council
approved a resolution supporting a county -wide ballot measure for a one -
quarter cent sales tax to be used for libraries. On October 21st the
San Diego County Board of Supervisors established the San Diego Regional
Library Authority for the purpose of submitting to the voters a ballot
measure to increase the sales tax by one -quarter cent for five years for
library purposes. Mayor George Waters represented National City at the
Library Authority meeting on November 3rd. The members of the Authority
reviewed the proposed ordinance and proposed a time frame to discuss and
adopt the ordinance. Each jurisdiction was asked to submit proposed
expenditure plans for the ordinance by December 11th.
Attached is the draft for National City's proposed expenditure plan,
describing how the sales tax revenue will be spent in National City.
At the November 12th Library Board of Trustees meeting, the Library Board
approved the proposed expenditure plan.
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
Actual. fiscal;impact for.. National'City::is unknown.:at-this
time.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve expenditure plan.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Library Board of Trustees
approved the Expenditure Plan on November 12, 1997.
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
National City Public Library Expenditure Plan.
A-700 (Rev R/801
Proposed National City Public Library Expenditure Plan.
NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY
1
Replace the outdated library with a new facility designed
to meet the future needs of National City residents.
2
The remainder of the funds would be placed in an endowment
fund. The endowment would provide annual interest revenue
for the following: - -
3
Provide additional hours of library service.
4
Provide funding for additional library services.
5
Enhance the Library's materials collection.
6
Provide increased access to electronic information.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
ITEM #8
Community Food Bank of National City
Board of Directors Meeting
November 20, 1997
Agenda
1. Call to Order
Welcome/Sharing & Caring
Opening Prayer
2. Roll Call
Class of '98: Ben Nichols, Louise Martin, Wilfred Reyna, Joan Burke
Class of '99: Mitch Beauchamp, Bob Hawken, Adiel De Pano, Patricia Andrews-Callod
Class of '00: Chuck Black, Socorro Mein, Ben Martinez, Sammie Lynch, Jim Kilinsky
Alternate: Ann McVeagh
3. Minutes of the October 16, 1997 Meeting
4. Treasurer's Report (Ben M.)
5. Old Business
Site Search Task Force (Jim, Patricia, Ben, Chuck)
Incorporation & Tax Exemption: $55 State fees, $150 Federal fees (Adiel)
Promotional Brochure (Jim)
6. City Council Presentation (Ben M.)
7. Fundraising Ideas
Thanksgiving Worship Celebration, November 26, 7 p.m. First United Methodist Church
8. New Business
Speaking Engagement, Lion's Club, November 25, 12 noon at Keith's Restaurant
9. Next Meeting:
10. Closing Prayer & Adjournment
(Note: If you wish to place an item on the agenda, please call the secretary at least a week
before the next scheduled meeting of the Board. He can be reached by phone at 477-2741 or by
fax at 477-1435. Thanks -- Adiel De Pano)
1-" / / - 1
kpfk A rf-
"14
ITYFaatit�z
OF n
y�'�aivai ���
Do you know that ...
• 8,000 of the 15,000 dwellings in
National city receive some form of
welfare assistance?
• 26.6% of Sweetwater high
School's population of 1,900
students receive some form of
AFDC?
• as welfare reform continues to
unfold, there is a concern that
many may not have their basic
needs met?
• many will be a risk of being
trapped in the cycle of poverty,
codependency and hopelessness?
• the working poor barely make
ends meet and have no or little
food at the end of the month?
(new statistic)
There is a
Community Food hank
in National City that is
dedicated to ...
♦ breaking the cycle of poverty
♦ reducing co-dependency
• providing emergency food to
resident and transient people who
do not have adequate food.
♦ networking with churches and
community oprganizations such as
the Interfaith Shelter Network.
• assisting with needs beyond hunger
such as clothing, housing, job
placement/training, medical
prescriptions, transportation and
counseling.
We need you to help
by ... •
♦ providing staple food items
• providing funds for food
purchases
• donating keezers and refrigera-
tion equipment.
• providing accounting services.
• becoming a volunteer.
• becoming a grant writer for the
Community Food Bank of
National City.
1
For more information,
contact a member of the
Board of Directors ...
Rev. Patricia Andrews-Callori — 474-89I (
Mr. Mitch Beauchamp — 477-5333
Mr. Chuck Black 477-4147
Rev. Miel De Pano 477-2741
Mr. Bob I lawken — 474-2947
Rev. Jim Kilinsky ---- 477-4147
Mr. Sammie Lynch 477-6787
Mrs. Louise Martin 477-5221
Mr. lien Martinez 336-4250
Ann McVeagh 336-4991
Mr. Ben Nichols — 474-6565
Chaplain Wilfred Reyna 470-4139
•
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE November 25, 1997
U MMUNITY BUILDING FOR SWEETWATER HIGH SCHOOL VARSITY AND JUNIOR
VARSITY FOOTBALL BANQUET, AND WAIVER OF FEES
AGENDA ITEM NO 9
PREPARED BY �/ �. DEPARTMENT
C.R. Williams, J �/ Public Works
EXPLANATION.
By the attached letter, Alma Graham, PTSA President, Sweetwater High is requesting use of the
Community Building on 13 December 1997 from 3 PM until 10 PM for a 200 person Football Banquet.
Waiver of Fees is also requested.
Normal Rental:
Hall: $615.79
Kitchen: 70.00
Custodial: 122.87
Total: $808.66
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
If waiver of fees granted, loss of $808.66 to General Fund will occur.
Account No. s�rn
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Council has authorized this use i e past, with waiver of fees.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
TA TACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
PTSA President Graham letter of 20 October 1997.
A•200 (Re. ,/2C,
October 20, 1997
Alma Graham
PTSA President, Sweetwater High
903 Ethel Place
National City, CA. 91950
Honorable George Waters
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA. 91950
ti
Mayor Waters, Members of the City Council;
As PTSA President of Sweetwater High School, I come to you
again to respectfully request that you waive the fee for the use of the
National City Community Center for the Sweetwater High School Varsity
and Junior Varsity football program.
The purpose of the use of the facility would be to host a banquet
recognizing the participants of the 1997 football season.
Once again we intend to provide this banquet for every single player
on both teams. The cost will be donated by our organization which means
that no players will be expected to pay for their meal. We expect to serve
over 100 students. We have the support of the Administration as well as the
community in this endeavor and we intend to honor these students in the
manner befitting their dedication to the history of athletics in our great city.
Your consideration of this matter will be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Alma Graham
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE November 25, 1997 AGENDA ITEM NO.
10
% ITEM TITLE
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Ivan Bodge
PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla DEPARTMENT
EXPLANATION.
The claim of Ivan Bodge arises from an occurrence on September 28, 1997, and was filed
with the City Clerk's Office on October 17, 1997.
City Clerk
XX
Environmental Review NJA
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No
TA F RECOMMENDATION
Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No
A -?CC IRe.. v/ACI
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
11
MEETING DATE November 25, 1997 AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE
CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Ivan Bodge, Laura Bodge & Family
PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla �l DEPARTMENT City Clerk
EXPLANATION.
The claim of Ivan Bodge, Laura Bodge & Family arises from an occurrence on
September 14, 1997, was filed with the City Clerk's Office on October 17, 1997, and
amended on October 28, 1997.
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
XX N/A
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
N/A
A•200 (Rev 9/201