Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000 05-09 CC AGENDA PKT
AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING NATIONAL CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2000 - 6:00 P.M. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY THE CITY MANAGER, TOM G. MCCABE INVOCATION APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 9, 2000. COUNCIL AGENDA 5/9/00 Page 2 PRESENTATION U.S. Census 2000 Update - Rosalie Zarate PROCLAMATION Proclaiming May 2000, as: "Veteran Appreciation Month" PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing: To review the Draft FY 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and FY 2000-01 Annual Plan Documents including proposed Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) program budgets and consider public comment and testimony. (Community Development Commission) (Refer to Item #5) CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. 2. Resolution No. 2000-55 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing submission of National City Transit FY 2001 Short Range Transit Plan. (National City Transit) 3. Resolution No. 2000-56 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National authorizing the Chief of Police to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with South Bay Community Services to provide Family Violence Response Team Services to community members at scenes of domestic violence. (Police) COUNCIL AGENDA 5/9/00 Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 4. WARRANT REGISTER #44 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $179,582.62 NON CONSENT RESOLUTION 5. Resolution No. 2000-57 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the Draft 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and Draft 2000-01 Annual Plan including the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) program budgets. (Community Development Commission) (Refer to Item #1) NEW BUSINESS 6. Use of the Community Building by the National City Chamber of Commerce for Salute to the Navy Luncheon on October 11, 2000 and waiver of fees. (Public Works) -� CITY MANAGER -* CITY ATTORNEY -* OTHER STAFF COUNCIL AGENDA 5/9/00 Page 4 NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) - MAYOR -* CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. ADJOURNMENT Next Regular City Council Meeting - May 16, 2000 at 3:00 p.m. - Council Chambers, Civic Center. TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Item # Program City Council Amount Proposed SUMMARY CDBG 2000-01 COUNCIL ACTION 5-9-00 Vote YES Vote NO 14 Granger Music Hall Paint $10,000.00 failed M W B I S $0.00 passed B I S M W 15 Graffiti (75% of Program) $37,500.00 passed unanimous 16 Housing Inspection $30,000.00 passed unanimous 17 Family Resource Center Expand $25,000.00 passed unanimous 18 The Bridge $0.00 failed M W B I S $15,000.00 passed B I S M W 19 Civic Center Drive Streetscape $600,000.00 passed unanimous 20 Installation of Pedestrian Ramps $50,000.00 passed unanimous 21 Re -installation of Street Lights $50,000.00 passed B I M S Abstain: W 22 Misc. Storm Drains $50,000.00 passed unanimous 23 Concrete Improvements $0.00 unanimous 24 Alley Improvements $0.00 unanimous 25 Las Palmas / Kimball Parking Lots $130,000.00 passed unanimous 26 Kimball Bowl Restrooms $130,000.00 passed unanimous 27 Paradise Creek - East End $0.00 unanimous 28 Bonita Mesa Road Drain $0.00 unanimous 29 Las Palmas Park Street Widening $0.00 unanimous 30 Neighborhood curb / gutter / sw $0.00 unanimous 31 Fire Fighting Equipment $50,000.00 passed unanimous 32 Main Fire Station $0.00 unanimous 33 Tennis / Basketball Court Rehab $30,000.00 passed unanimous 34 Fair Housing Program $0.00 unanimous 35 CDBG Administration $1,850.00 passed unanimous HOME Budget $633,000.00 passed unanimous Legend: S = Soto I = lnzunza W = Waters M = Morrison B= Beauchamp Item # Program City Council Amount Proposed SUMMARY CDBG 2000-01 COUNCIL ACTION 5-9-00 Vote YES Vote NO 1 Independent Living for Seniors 2 After School Transportation 3 Nutrition Program 4 Legal Services 5 Graffiti (25% program) 6 Swim Program 7 Tiny Tots 8 Neighborhood Police Expansion 9 Literacy Services 10 Family Learning Traditions 11 Critical Hours Program 12 Legal Services 13 Employment Retention $0.00 $15,000.00 $30,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 $17,875.00 $10,000.00 $21,000.00 $18,000.00 $25,000.00 $40,000.00 $0.00 $50,150.00 $0.00 $20,000.00 $12,500.00 $15,000.00 $12,500.00 $0.00 unanimous passed unanimous died passed unanimous unanimous failed M W B I S passed B I S W M passed unanimous passed B I W M S passed unanimous passed unanimous passed unanimous passed BMW SI died passed BIS M W died died passed final unanimous unanimous Prodamation WHEREAS, The people of our community have great appreciation and admiration for the many local men and women who served their country in the armed forces to protect and preserve the freedoms enjoyed by our community and by all Americans; and WHEREAS, Some veterans have encountered obstacles in readjusting to civilian life; and WHEREAS, Veterans, many of them disabled, represent a significant share of our state's homeless population; and WHEREAS, Veterans possess a wide variety of valuable job qualifications and skills, including experience, maturity, leadership, and loyalty, that make them ideal candidates for employment; and WHEREAS, Local Veterans Employment Representatives assigned to Employment Development Offices are committed to ensuring that veterans receive the services and programs to which they are entitled, and to promoting employer interest in hiring veterans. NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE H. WATERS, Mayor of the City of National City, do hereby proclaim May 2000, as: "VETERAN APPRECIATION MONTH" and urge all local employers, organized labor, veterans organizations, and other government leaders to support this worthy campaign to increase employment opportunities for the men and women who have faithfully served our nation in the military. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of National City to be affixed this 9th day of May, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE May 9, 2000 REFER 10 1.1114 #5 1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7-ITEM TITLE pURl IC HFARIN(;• TO REVIEW THE DRAFT FY 2000-05 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND FY 2000-01 ANNUAL PLAN DOCUMENTS INCLUDING PROPOSED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT (HOME) PROGRAM BUDGETS AND CONSIDER PUBLIC COMMENT AND TESTIMONY PREPARED BY DEPARTM NT EXPLANATION Paul Desrochers, Executive Director CDC (Continued from April 25, 2000) Environmental Review Financial Statement The City will receive $633,000 in HOME and $1,411,000 in CDBG funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for FY 2000-01. N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Council consider public comment on the draft 2000-05 Consolidated Plan including proposed CDBG and HOME program requests and proceed to the following action item on this agenda. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CDBG and HOME recommendations from the Housing and Community Development Committee (HCDC) are listed in Attachments Nos. 1 and 2 of the action item report following • ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Proof of Publication (Public Hearing Notice) 2. Recommendations from HCDC and CDC Staff (CDBG). 3. Recomendations from HCDC and CDC Staff (HOME) 4. 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and 2000-01 Annual Plan (draft previously distributed). 5. Consolidated Plan Notebooks (containing all applications — previously distributed). A-200 (940) revious years -status report —c,uo. . EXPLANATION CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 9, 2000 (Continued) On April 25, 2000, the City Council received public comment and testimony from several community organizations in regard to proposed capital projects and public service programs, as well as the draft 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and 2000-01 Annual Plan (CPAP) documents (Please see Attachment No. 4). Per HUD regulations, the City must hold a 30-day comment period for the public to review the CPAP documents and to make comments or suggest changes. This 30-day period started April 8, 2000 and ended May 8, 2000. Both CDBG and HOME recommendations have been provided for Council consideration by the Housing & Community Development Committee and CDC staff (Attachments 2 and 3). Please see the following project descriptions and comments for the CDBG and HOME Programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Summary of Recommended Budget for 2000-01 Administration & Planning $ 85,000 Public Services $ 211,650 Community Projects $ 102,500 City CIP $1,011,850 Total $1,411,000 Administration Rr. Planning Staff is recommending $75,000 for the expenses related to the general coordination, supervision, and management of the CDBG Program. A half-time accountant in the Finance Department is funded by a portion of these funds. This amount ($75,000) represents only 5% of entire CDBG grant. Per CDBG regulations, the City is allowed to utilize up to a maximum of 20% or $282,200 on Administration & Planning. HUD requires facilitation of a Fair Housing Program for all cities receiving CDBG funds. Staff is recommending that the City Council set -aside $10,000 for this purpose. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 1 of 4 Pnhlic Services For the Public Services category of the budget, a total of $211,650 or 15% of the CDBG grant can be spent on public services. This year, staff is recommending that the entire 15% be allocated with funding going to several non-profit programs, the CDC Nutrition Program, the COPS Program, and other City services. It is important to be clear on the impact that Public Service programs could have on the City's General Fund or other funds. The following table shows the "City and CDC" programs that are currently requested for the next fiscal year: Current Tab # Program Request 3 Nutrition Program $ 50,000 5 Graffiti (25%) $ 17,875 6 Swim Program $ 21,000 7 Tiny Tots $ 18,000 8 COPS (expansion) $ 111,292 9 Literacy Program S 58 000 TOTAL $276,167 Less Avail. Funding ($711 650) Deficit $64,517 If the City Council chooses to fund the above City programs at these levels, then there will be a $64,517 deficit. Presumably, at budget time, the difference would be made out of the City's General Fund or other source(s) would be considered. Even if the City were able to fund this $64,517 difference from other funding sources, this still does not address the fact that funding the City's programs at the above levels necessarily means that none of the other Public Service programs could be funded. Simply put, within the Public Services category of the CDBG Budget, there are simply not enough dollars to go around. City CIP RT. Community Projects - Staff is recommending that Civic Center Drive/National City Boulevard Streetscape again be the priority project this year. This year's request is for $600,000. This amount of funding combined with existing funding from previous years will put the first phase of construction at approximately $1,700,000. In this instance, the first phase would include National City Boulevard, from 12th to 14th Street, and Civic Center Drive, from National City Boulevard to Wilson Avenue. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 2 of 4 Other CIPs recommended for funding include Fire fighting equipment, Highland Ave. Street Lights, ADA pedestrian ramps, miscellaneous storm drain and concrete improvements, Las Palmas and Kimball Parking lot rehabilitation, as well as rehabilitation of tennis and basketball courts in Las Palmas, Kimball and El Toyon Parks. The recommended community projects include the graffiti, housing inspection program, handicap accessibility for the Family Resource Center and exterior painting of the Granger Music Hall. HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) Recommended Budget for 2000-01 Administration $ 63,300 CDC Administration CHDO Operations $ 15,000 CHDO (i.e. Christmas in July) New Construction $179,700 New Construction/For-Sale Housing Rehabilitation $100,000 Spot Blight Removal Program Acquisition $250,000 First-time Homebuyers Rental Assistance t 25,000 Domestic Violence TOTAL $633,000 HOME funds are restricted to providing housing assistance for families with a total household income under 80% of the County median income. HOME funds can be used for Administration, Rehabilitation, New Construction, First-time Homebuyers, and Rental Assistance. Administration (CDC) $63,300 is recommended for administration of the HOME program including general oversight, monitoring and management of the program. HUD allows 10% of the grant amount to be utilized for this purpose. Community Housing Development Organization (CHT)O) $15,000 is recommended as a capacity grant to the Christmas in July Program. HUD allows a maximum of 5% or $31,650 to be used for this purpose. A minimum of 15% of the HOME funds, or $94,950, must be used by a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) for the development of affordable housing. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 3 of 4 Rehabilitation $100,000 is recommend for the new City/CDC Spot Blight Removal Program. This program requires the CDC to match City funding for the purchase of property in accordance with the recently amended Abandoned Facilities Ordinance. Since abandoned buildings exist both inside and outside the Redevelopment Project area, it is appropriate that the City and CDC provide matching funds to purchase and cause the redevelopment of those properties that otherwise would remain a visual and economic blight on the neighborhood and City. First -Time Homehuyers Staff is recommending $250,000 be utilized for this purpose. These funds will be used in conjunction with CDC's Low to Moderate -Income Housing Fund. When homebuyers have income below 80% of County median, HOME funds can be used. Buyers with income between 80% and 120% of County median are assisted with Low/Mod funds. New Construction Staff is recommending $179,900 be used to promote the new construction of affordable, for -sale housing. Tenant -Based Rental Assistance Staff recommends that $25,000 again be reserved to assist victims of domestic violence with their housing needs. This will be the third and last year of a three-year grant with South Bay Community Services. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 4 of 4 RESOLUTION 2000 — 57 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE DRAFT 2000-05 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND DRAFT 2000-01 ANNUAL PLAN INCLUDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT (HOME) PROGRAM BUDGETS WHEREAS, the City of National City administers the allocation of CDBG and HOME funding for the Federal Government under the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and WHEREAS, as a grantee of CDBG and HOME funds, the City of National City is required to prepare a Five -Year Consolidated Plan for FY 2000-05 and a One -Year Annual Plan for FY 2000-01; and WHEREAS, the City desires to allocate program funds for the 2000-01 program year; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City held a public hearing on the allocation of said funds on March 7, April 25, and May 9, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to allocate these funds as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the CDBG and HOME funds as shown on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B" are approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City Council, to submit the 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and 2000-01 Annual Plan for the expenditure of said funds to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). PASSED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk %In:: George H. r.o riser, III City Attorney PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Diego: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of THE STAR NEWS, a newspaper of general circulation, published ONCE WEEKLY in the city of National City and the South Bay Judicial District, county of San Diego, which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San. Diego, State of California, under the date of April 23, 1951, Case Number 182529; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: 4/21, 4/28, all in the year 2000 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Chula Vista, California 91910 this 28th cl ay 11�Signatu a k1t1 PRINCIP CLER This space is for the County Clerk's filing stamp Proof of Publication of NC 13523 Public Hewing Notice I PUBUG:t1E*RiNGNOit6E` t `2OD0;Of-CtlNSDG1WtEp.:, *14-N= ItdG it>:.: C 4D � TtION:EOR L' _-CO�lIMttrfl FmwfuP epiti.ocK „rfAllierflODBP(E T :-.;PARr EBSI-W:A O riM; rt -''. " ?.Pitiuicil ttiel cam 1:: n a.`Pu>l jic':1RIN6G, tm._ qi1i-',: esdaiiniik:25''. : ;pall!I x+d . pApest by ;CD"f'mie11:: cl eenihers;,si 293. Natierra ity: DirleVard. 14atiekilAVaTfQmia. CfiepastS flt.itiepitble. :h`e iingsareto.i priblic: tomseirt;.olf4he 'iousigg=. jitOittrtmlinfty ydevelop fie[iteetis�:v(;`ddwec-n-.. or ie rot seho'Idi' aa°T1a= `tionarCity.' e C 6: unclh :414iliafie0i � Feseniaflp p `{rtilrjaaGptirafits 4pd ...con- `:sidotpub'lielnttd bn'iherVi 2000 A5-:ConSQfidata 1;Plan on-Apill:; : il' Slili t onstd 'Tuia7-.temgpl=: :1 andSiaf[:ieconimehda 1fopson;!Mays' i'fpr-3be C[tB'G and ADMEDragram _Budgi:t .3AF p€exrmately SI,•OOt OOOis-aaariablethis:. reaCfe/tii t3D--ior,`_3wusulg"' .eiid. -cpinm0111 .deveraps jmentl+ioject - -;_- -. `fp+tcthdr i On.iiatoA' oit the bavc:p onSOtidated=- :Plao_Icirmi S_rr��n�_'be: 1 -i inie*'1 C4mml$illy Devebpment. ompiission, tdFioe t4tf Ej2tir Sheet Suede=BxCll *.inal:'"Cdy-xli- 91950 oj'by calking Ben Matp le at,{81t9Z b-:�Il Paulesfochers fxecutNe.DirectQr NCi3523 -- 4112 28/001 Attachment No. 1 2000-01 CDBG BUDGET - PRELIMINARY 09•May-00 g ORGANIZATION Public Servkes 1 Access Center of San Diego 2 Boys & Girls Club of NC 3 CDC 4 Legal Legal of San Diego 5 N.C. Building & Safety Dept. 6 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 7 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 8 N.C. Police Department 9 N.C. Public Library 10 San Diego Council on Literacy 11 South Bay Community Services 12 SW Center for Asian Pac. Amer. Law 13 Suits You San Diego Total Public Services Community Protects 14 N.C. Historical Society 15 N.C. Building & Safety Department 16 N.C. Building & Safety Department 17 National City Collaborative 18 Operation Samahan, Inc. Total Community Projects city r=p 19 CDC/Engineering 20 Engineering 21 Engineering 22 Engineering 23 Engineering 24 Engineering 25 Engineering 26 Engineering 27 Engineering 28 Engineering 29 Engineering 30 Engineering 31 Fire 32 Fire 33 Parks & Recreation Total City CIP Administration & Planning 34 Fair Housing Council of SD N/A CDC/City Total Administration & Planning / GRAND TOTAL PROGRAM Independent Living for Seniors and the Disabled $ After -School Transportation $ N.C. Nutrition Program $ Legal Services S Graffiti (25% of program) $ Swim Program $ Tiny Tots $ Neigh. Police (expansion) S Literacy Services $ Family Learning Traditions $ NC Critical Hours Program $ Legal Services $ Employment Retention Training $ $ Granger Music Hall - Exterior paint Graffiti (75% of program) Housing Inspection Program Family Resource Center Expansion The Bridge Civic Center Dr./NC Blvd. Streetscape Installation of Pedestrian Ramps "Re -installation of Street Lights Misc. Storm Drains Mc Concrete improvements Alley improvements Las Palmas/Kimball Park - Parking Lots Kimball Bowl Restr00ms Paradise Creek Channel - East End Improvements to Bonita Mesa Road Drain Las Palmas Park - Street Widening Neighborhood curb, gutter, sidewalk Fire Fighting Equipment Main Fire Station Tennis Court/Basketball Court Rehab Fair Housing Program CDBG Administration RIOUESTED }CDC RIC 5,000 $ • $ 15,725 $ 15,000 $ 50,000 $ 30,000 $ 10,000 S - $ 17,875 $ 12,500 5 21,000 $ 21,000 $ 18,000 $ 18,000 $ 111,292 $ 55,150 $ 58,000 S 40,000 $ 4,500 $ - $ 61,500 $ 20,000 S 50,000 $ - $ 7,500 $ - $ 430,382 $ 211,650 $ $ 12,500 $ 10,000 $ $ 53,625 $ 37,500 $ $ 31,500 $ 30,000 $ $ 35,000 $ 25,000 $ $ 30,000 $ - $ $ 162,625 9 102,500 $ $ 600,000 $ 600,000 S $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ $ 50,000 $ -- - 50,000 S. $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ S 100,000 $ - $ $ 100,000 $ • $ S 130,000 ' S 111,850 $ $ 130,000 $ - $ $ 60,000 5 - $ S 150,000 $ 100,000 S S 100,000 $ - S S 450,000 S - $ S 54,000 $ 50,000 $ 5 333,400 S - S $ 30,000 $ - $ $ 2,487,400 $ 1,011,850 $ $ 12,000 $ 10,000 $ $ 75,000 $ 75,000 $ $ 87,000 $ 85,000 $ $ 3,167,417 $ 1,411,000 $ 51,850 $ 30,000 1,011,850 10,000 $ 75,000 S 85,000 1,411,000 STAFF REC 99-00 pUNDING NOTES Pub. Services Cap NR equals $211,650 15,000 S 15,000 30,000 $ 20,000 NR NR- NO Request 12,500 $ 10,000 last Year 21,000 $ 21,000 18,000 $ 18,000 NF- Not Funded 25,000 NF last Year 40,000 $ 40,000 NR 50,150 $ 20,000 Expanded request - NR for2000-01 NR 2I3,650 10,000 37,500 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 $ 102,500 Comm. Projects has NR no funding cap 56,250 30,000 50,000 NR City CIP has no 600,000 S 647,750 funding cap 100,000 $ 50,000 50,000 $ 35,000 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 NF 130,000 NR NR NF NF NR NF 37,000 NF NR Admin & Planning 10,000 cap . $282,200 75,000 2000-01 HOME BUDGET ACTIVITY Administration Acquisition Rehabilitatib't1" New Construction Tenant -Based Rent CHDO Operations TOTAL HCDC STAFF REC $ 63,300 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 179,700 $ 25,000 $ 15,000 $ 633,000 REC EXPLANATION $ 63,300 CDC Administration (10% max) $ 250,000 First-time homebuyers $ 100,000 Spot Blight Removal Program $ 179,700 New construction/For Sale Housing $ 25,000 Housing for Domestic Violence $ 15,000 Christmas In July Operations Request $ 633,000 Attachment No. 3 2000-01. CDHG BUDGET - PRELIb>aili&Y 9•May.00 # 0RGMHZAT10N Patric Services 1 Access Center of San Diego 2 Boys & Girls Club of NC 3 CDC 4 Legal Legal of San Diego 5 N.C.Buil di ng &Safety Dept. 6 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 7 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 8 N.C. Police Department 9 N.C.PublicLibrary 10 San Diego Council an Literacy 11 South Bay Community Services 12 SW Center for Asian Pac. Amer. Law 13 Suit You San Olego Tatd Pcirl✓<Srrains CamourityPmiecfs 14 N.C. Historical Society 15 N.0 Building &Safety Department 16 N.0 Building & Safety Department 17 Natbnal CityCollaborative 18 0peation Samahan, Inc. TataCasmmadty Projects r r rr_CIP L9 COC/Engineering 20 Engneering 21 Engneering 22 Engneering 23 Engneering 24 Engneering 25 Engneering 25 Engneering 27 Engineering 28 Engineering 29 Engineering 30 Engineering 31 Fire 32 Fire 33 Parrs & Recreation Tots( City LIP Atrintrxistratian 6Plarmtrrg 34 Fair Housing Council of SD N/A CDC/City Tatrl Administration &Planning oaken TO PROGRAM Independent Living far 3nia r_ and the Disabled After•Schoal Transpart,ion PLC, Nutrition Program Legal Services Graffiti (25% of pragrar) Swim Program Tiny Tats Neigh. Police (expansirr) Literacy Services Family Learning Traditins NC entice! Hours Progsm Legal Services Employment Retention rainirg Granger Music Hall • E.'sriar faint Graffiti (75% of pragrat) H o usi ng I nspectia n Prr. rn Family Resource CenteExpaisian The Bridge Civic Center Dr./NC Bld. Stnetscape Installation of Pedestrtn Ranps Re -installation of StrestLight. Misc. Storm Drains Misc Concrete Improvenents Alley Improvements Las Palmas/Kimball Pak • Peking Lots Kimball Bowl Restroons Paradise Creek Chance - Eas:End Improvements to Sonia Mesi Road Drain Las Palmas Park • Streit Widening Neighborhood curb, gtter, sidewalk Fire Fighting Equlpmet Main Fire Station Tennis Caurt/Basketbal Court Rehab Fair Housing Program COBG Administration REOu6TE0 5,C00 $ 15,725 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 17,875 $ 21,000 $ 18,000 $ 111,292 $ 58,000 $ 4,500 $ 61,500 $ 50,000 $ 7,500 $ 430,332 5 12,500 53,625 31,500 35,000 30,000 $ S HCOC REC L5,000 $ 30,000 $ $ 12,500 $ 21.000 $ 18,000 $ 55,150 $ 40,000 $ 20,000 $ $ $ STAFF: REC 15,000 30,000 12,500 21,000 18,000 25,000 40,000 50,150 z11,650 $ 10,000 $ 37,500 $ 30,000 $ 25,000 $ - S 16z,625 $ 600,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 130,000 130,000 60,000 150,000 100,000. 450,000 54,000 333,400 30,000 2,487,400 12,000 75,000 87,000 3,Ii7,417 212,650 10,000 37,500 30,000 25.000 102,500 $ 600,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 111,850 100,000 50,000 $ I,011,850 $ 10,000 S S 75,000 S $ 85000 $ $ 1.411, 000 $ 102,500 600,000 100,000 50.000 50,000 130,000 51,850 30,000 1,011,850 10,000 75,000 e4000 1,421,000 2000-01 HOME BUDGET ACTIVITY Administration Acquisition Rehabilitation New Construction Tenant -Based Rent CHDO Operations TOTAL HCDC REC $ 63,300 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 179,700 $ 25,000 $ 15,000 $ 633,000 STAFF REC $ 63,300 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 179,700 $ 25,000 $ 15,000 $ 633,000 EXPLANATION CDC Administration (10% max) First-time homebuyers Spot Blight Removal Program New construction/For Sale Housing Housing for Domestic Violence Christmas In July Operations Request CDBG STATUS REPORT 1996-97 TO 1999-00 DEPT./ORGANIZATION 1996-97 Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Library Police Police Citizens Patrol Police Building & Safety Building & Safety CDC Engineering Fire Parks and Recreation Boys & Girls Club Public Works Engineering Engineering Engineering Fair Housing Council of SD TOTAL 1996-97 DEPT./ORGANIZATION 1997-98 Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Library National School District South Bay Comm. Services Police Building & Safety Building & Safety Building & Safety Fire Fire Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Engineering Boys and Girls Club CDC SUHSD Operation Samahan Public Works Public Wofks Public Works Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering P&R/CDC TOTAL 1997-98 PROGRAM/PROJECT Tiny Tots Learn to Swim Literacy Program Youth Diversion Juvenile Offender Community Patrols COPS Program Graffiti Program Housing Inspections Mile of Cars Streetscape Traffic Signal/24th & Wilson Fire Truck Dusk to Dawn Lights Improvements to facility Las Palmas Pool Deck ADA Pedestrian Ramps Sidewalks, Curbs, Gutters Scoreshacks Fair Housing Program PROGRAM/PROJECT Tiny Tots Learn to Swim Literacy Program 6th Grade Camp Rent Deposit/Security COPS Program Housing Inspections Graffiti Program Library Re•roof Fire Truck Fire Equipment Baseball Field Renovation Dusk to Dawn Lights Scoreshacks Site improvements Civic Center Drive • design Batting Cages Clinic Expansion • design El Toyon Scoreboard Kimball Bowl Rehab Las Palmas Chlorination System ADA Pedestrian Ramps Misc. Concrete Improvements 50/50 Improvements Misc. Storm Drains Wilson Ave. Drainage Casa de Salud Expansion BUDGETED $ 18,000 $ $ 24,000 $ $ 40,000 $ $ 34,488 $ $ 19,160 $ $ 2,500 $ $ 28,744 $ $ 101,300 $ $ 29,500 $ $ 500,000 $ $ 125,000 $ $ 107,300 $ $ 25,000 $ $ 20,000 $ $ 60,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 45,000 $ E 9.500 5 $ 1,389,492 $ BUDGETED $ • 18,000 $ $ 21,000 $ $ 40,000 $ $ 3,000 $ $ •5,000 $ $ 122,750 $ $ 29,600 $ $ 75,500 $ $ 90,000 $ $ 170,300 $ $ 30,000 $ $ 45,000 $ $ 10,000 $ $ 45,000 $ $ 20,000 $ $ 35,000 $ $ 3,000 $ $ 19,850 $ $ 12,000 $ $ 255,000 $ $ 20,000 $ $ 75,000 $ $ 50,000 $ $ 25,000 $ $ 25,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 150,000 $ BALANCE • • 9,824 • • • 9,824 BALANCE STATUS Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Project completed Project completed 2 of 3 lease payments Project ongoing Project completed Project cancelled Project completed Project completed Project completed Program completed STATUS Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed 1,220 Program ongoing Program completed Program completed Program ongoing • Project completed • 3 of 3 lease payments Project completed 45,000 Project under construction 10,000 Project on•going Project completed Project completed • Project completed Project completed 4,653 Project completed Project completed 230,351 Project under design Project completed Project completed Project completed 25,000 Project on•going Project completed Project completed Project cancelled $ 1,495,000 $ 316,224 PEPT./ORGAN► fr PROGRAM/PROJECT $UDGETE' BALANCE STATUS 1998-99 Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Library Police Fair Housing Council of SD NC Critical Hours Collaborative Boys & Girls Club of NC Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department CDC CDC/Parks & Recreation CDC CDC N.C. Living History Farm Preserve N.C. Collaborative operation Samahan, Inc. Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering Fire Parks & Recreation Public Works Public Works Public Works TOTAL 1998-99 DEPT,/ORGANIZATION 1999-00 Fair Housing Council of SD Boys & Girls Club of NC Comm. Dev, Commission Community Food Bank of NC InterAmerican College South Bay Community Services N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. N.C. Public Library Accion San Diego Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department National City Collaborative USIAA Engineering Engineering Engineering Fire Public Works Public Works CDC Fire Total 1999-00 Tiny Tots Learn to Swim Literacy Program COPS Program Fair Housing Program Critical Hours Program After School Transportation Graffiti Program Graffiti Truck Literacy Program • Relocation Housing Inspection Program "Q" Ave. • Capital Contingency Casa de Salud Park Expansion Nutrition Program Higher Education Facility Reroofing of Stein Farm Family Resource Center Clinic Building Expansion Pedestrian Ramps Misc. Concrete Improvements Misc. Storm Drains Street Lights - Highland (Div. To 8th) Fire Equipment El Toyon Park Rehab Re -roof Kimball Senior Center Las Palmas Pool Plumbing Rehab. Reconstruct Las Palmas Score Shacks PROGRAM/PROJECT $ 18,000 $ 21,000 $ 40,000 $ 56,525 $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 75,500 $ 90,000 $ 6,520 $ 33,000 $ 220,775 $ 200,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 6,200 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ 30,000 $ 75,000 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 1,457,520 Fair Housing Program $ After -School Transportation $ N.C. Nutrition Program $ Program Coordinator $ Serving National City $ NC Critical Hours Program $ Swim Program $ Tiny Tots $ Literacy Services $ Accion San Diego $ Graffiti $ Housing Inspection Program $ Family Resource Center Expansion $ Archie Moore Ed. & Training Complex $ Ped. Ramps/Misc. Concrete Improvements $ Misc. Storm Drains Re -installation of Street Lights Firefighting Equipment Fire Station #15 • Emerg. Generator Las Palmas Park Well Rehab Civic Center Dr./NC Blvd. Streetscape New Fire Station BUDGETED • 21,043 • • • 87,036 • • 100,000 28,530 7,680 9,499 73,060 10,859 $ 337,707 j3ALANCE 10,000 $ 4,903 15,000 $ 20,000 $ 15,000 $ 11,486 20,000 $ 13,036 20,000 $ 6,703 21,000 $ 18,000 $ 40,000 $ 9,976 10,000 $ • 66,250 $ 26,181 30,000 $ 19,140 50,000 $ 50,000 20,000 $ 20,000 100,000 $ 83,117 50,000 $ 50,000 35,000 $ 35,000 37,000 $ 25,801 25,000 $ 25,000 30,000 $ 30,000 1,163,320 $ 1,097,068 50,000 $ 35.625 1,845,570 $ 1,543,036 Program completed Program completed Program ongoing Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program ongoing Truck to be delivered Proect completed Program completed Project completed Project cancelled Program on•going Project completed Project completed Project completed Fundraising Project completed Project completed Project completed Project completed Project on -going Project completed with other fu Project under design Project completed Project cancelled STATUS Project on -going Project ongoing Project ongoing Program ongoing Project underway Program on -going Program ongoing Program ongoing Program on -going Project completed Program on -going Project on -going Project underway Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE May 9, 2000 2 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11"- ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF NATIONAL CITY TRANSIT FY2001 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN PREPARED BY Alfredo Rios., EXPLANATION. DEPARTMENT National City Transit This Resolution authorizes the submission of National City Transit FY2001 Short Range Transit Plan. It contains a detailed listing describing major capital projects for the next several years. This begins on July 1, 2000 and ends June 30, 2005. All projects are subject to further review as part of the annual budget and TDA claim process Environmental Review x N/A Financial Statement This action only involves TDA funds and not the City's General Fund. Account No STAFF RECO ENDATION Staff recommends approval. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Short Range Transit Plan FY2001-2005. Resolution No 2000-55 A-200 (Rev. 4/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000 —55 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF NATIONAL CITY TRANSIT FY 2001 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN WHEREAS, the Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) is a document that serves as a planning tool for the orderly consideration of transit service and capital improvements; and WHEREAS, the SRTP supports federal grant application, operating budget preparation, and fund claims approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the Council hereby authorizes the Manger of National City Transit to submit the City's Short Range Transit Plan to the Metropolitan Transit Development Board. PASSED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney udo Hra . ecky Senior Assistant City Attorney tropolitanTransit.Development Board 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92101-7490 (619) 231-1466 FAX (619) 234-3407 DATE: April 7, 2000 TO: FROM: Thomas F. Larwin MEMORANDUM Metropolitan Transit System Operators/City Managers 7F SRTP 810.01 -(PC 2d23) SUBJECT: FY 2001-2005 SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN SUBMITTALS It is time again for local agencies and transit operators to submit their proposed transit operating programs and capital projects for the Metropolitan San Diego Draft FY 2001-2005 Short -Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The SRTP serves as the MTDB area planning tool for the orderly consideration of transit service and capital improvements. The document supports the federal grant applications, operating budget preparation, and fund claims approvals. This year, SRTP submittals are due to MTDB in three phases, as follows: April 28, 2000 — Transit Operating Programs and Capital Projects May 31, 2000 — Transit Development Act (TDA) Unallocated Balance Expenditure Plan September 29, 2000 — FY 00 Transit Operator Operating Statistics This memorandum describes the process for local agencies and transit operators to prepare these submittals. Please forward all submittals by their respective due dates to Michael Brusselback at MTDB. TRANSIT OPERATING PROGRAMS AND CAPITAL PROJECTS This year's SRTP will be based on the interim Regional Service Fund TDA allocation adopted by the MTD Board on February 24, 2000. The TDA estimates, originally expected in early February, only recently became available. As a result, the April 28 submittal date is critical to keeping the process on schedule. We appreciate your efforts to help us maintain the schedule. To facilitate the submittal process, we are available to meet with the operators and cities to review and discuss service proposals, capital needs, and the plans for use of unallocated balances and reserves. Member .Agencies: City of Chula Vista. City of Coronado. City of El Cajon. City of imperial Beach, City of La Mesa. City of Lemon Grove. City of National City. City of Poway. City of San Diego. City of Santee. County of San Diego. State of California Metropolitan Transit Development Board is Coordinator of the Metropolitan Transit System and the IktITaxrcab Administration Subsidiary Corporations:lSan Diego Transit Corporation. II San Diego Trolley. Inc.. and I ® !San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Company For personal trip planning or route information, call 1-800-COMMUTE or visit our web site at sdcommufe. corn! Fund Estimates TDA, State Transit Assistance (STA), and TransNet estimates provided by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) are included (Attachment A). These estimates indicate the amount of funds projected to be available for transit operating and capital purposes. Please base your submittals on these estimates. The tables in Attachment A include funding estimates of: • TDA Articles 4 and 8 funds by jurisdiction for FY 01; TDA estimates for FY 01-05; and TDA 4.5 funds. The FY 01 TDA estimate is nearly 9 percent more than the amount received in FY 00. TDA funds make up the majority of funding available for local transit operations. The estimates reflect the interim Regional Service Fund TDA formula by jurisdiction. The estimates are based on projections of total taxable sales by SANDAG's Demographic and Economic Forecasting Model. The amounts for each jurisdiction reflect the funds available for local services. • State Transit Assistance (STA) funds. Funding from the STA program is generated by the state sales tax on gasoline and diesel fuel. Claims may be submitted for STA funds, subject to the requirements of MTDB Policies and Procedures No. 21 (Attachment B). SRTP Capital and Operating Financial Plan The capital and operating financial plans should be fully supported by the service plans contained in the SRTP. If services remain unchanged, then the operating and financial plan should reflect only inflationary increases, and capital costs should only reflect replacement needs. For consistency purposes, a 3.5 percent annual inflation factor should be assumed for the five-year period. Any expansion services proposed within the FY 01 time period should have been proposed and evaluated as part of the FY 00 SRTP process (in year two of the FY 00 SRTP). New services for FY 02-05 may be proposed for evaluation and consideration for implementation in those years. The evaluation of service proposals will be based on the revised MTDB Policies and Procedures No. 43 (Attachment C), adopted by the MTD Board on January 13, 2000. Only those service proposals that are projected to meet MTDB Policies and Procedures No. 43 service standards will be included in the SRTP. Operational adjustments to increase on -time performance and operational efficiency that are not currently programmed in the SRTP will be given special consideration. -2- Service and Capital Program Submittals Each transit operator is requested to complete and return the enclosed Tables 1-4, shown in Attachment D, by April 28, 2000 (these tables, in Excel files, are enclosed): • On Table 1, Operation Program Details, we request all future service levels planned for the span of the SRTP from FY 2001-2005. • On Table 2, enter your Operating and Capital Funding Plan for the five-year period. • Table 3, Transit Capital Program and Cash Flow Expenditure Plan, will show your capital requirements for the next five years. Although the bus capital replacement program will be used to determine future needs, please outline any plans for future expansion and replacement buses in this table. Table 3 should also show projects where expenditures are expected to span more than a single year. Table 3 should be consistent with the capital line items on Table 2. TDA UNALLOCATED BALANCE EXPENDITURE PLAN This year, to prepare for future years' claims, the SRTP will include an outline of how each jurisdiction plans to spend its unallocated TDA balances and capital reserves. Expenditures of these reserves must be identified in this year's SRTP. Attachment A provides the "Unallocated TDA Carryover and Unspent TDA Capital Claims and Reserves" for operators and jurisdiction. Table 4, Unallocated TDA Balance Expenditure Plan (Attachment D), is a new form to determine the use of unallocated TDA balances over the five-year period of the SRTP. Please outline the uses, which are planned for each jurisdiction's unallocated balances. The projects need not be planned for the first year; however, they must be committed within the five-year span of the SRTP. It would also be helpful to indicate uses for existing TDA capital reserves that are not planned to be expended within the next two years. The submittal of Table 4 covering the unallocated balances spending plan should be submitted by May 31, 2000, to allow for additional discussion. SRTP UPDATE REVIEW AND ADOPTION SCHEDULE MTDB will complete this year's SRTP in two phases. The operators' submittals and capital plans, along with the basic demographic and agency information, is scheduled for completion and distribution as a draft in July 2000, and approval by the MTD Board by September 2000. The Transit Operators' Operating Statistics and related tables and figures within the SRTP will be compiled and distributed as a separate document in fall 2000. -3- A subsequent request to submit the Transit Operator Operating Statistics will be sent to you at a later date. If you have any questions concerning the SRTP Update or the submittal forms, please contact Michael Brusselback by telephone at (619) 557-4585, or via e-mail at mbrusselback@mtdb.sdmts.com. Thank you for your cooperation. SGreen M-SRTP01.MBRUSS Enclosures: A. SANDAG Funding Estimates B. MTDB Policies and Procedures No. 21 C. MTDB Policies and Procedures No. 43 D. Tables 1-4 (SRTP Submittal Forms) Diskette containing Tables 1-4 -4- ATrACEiHENT A Jurisdictional TDA Apportionment Estimates February, 2000 (Amounts in $000s) Jurisdiction;:: ;FY2001 FY2002 FY2003:I FY2004:;', 2005' Total Chula Vista $ 3,259 $ 3,278 $ 3,453 $ 3,637 $ 3,884 $ 17,511 Coronado 351 352 371 391 418 1,883 County MTDB Area 3,905 3,930 4,136 4,357 4,652 20,980 County Non -Board Area 2,127 2,227 2,344 2,469 2,630 11,797 County Total 6,032 6,157 6,480 6,826 7,282 32,777 El Cajon 1,682 1,691 1,781 1,878 2,007 9,039 Imperial Beach 263 262 278 296 320 1,419 La Mesa 796 802 844 889 948 4,279 Lemon Grove 544 547 576 607 651 2,925 MTDB - Regional Services 18,516 18,647 19,619 20,648 22,023 99,453 National City 1,116 1,120 1,182 1,248 1,338 6,004 North County Transit District 22,413 23,470 24,705 26,015 27,713 124,316 Poway 1,187 1,195 1,257 1,323 1,412 6,374 San Diego 18,294 18,423 19,383 20,400 21,758 98,258 Santee 01,115 1,122 1,182 1,245 1,331 5,995 1 MTDB "off the top" ADA Funds 573 2,677 - 2,845 3,026 3,151 12,272 MTDB Bus Replacement Fund 821 846 873 899 925 4,364 County Auditor Administration 35 36 37 38 39 185 SANDAG TDA Administration 375 300 300 400 325 1,700 2% Bicycle/Pedestrian Funds 1,814 1,899 1,999 2,105 2,243 10,060 SANDAG 2% Planning Funds 1,733 1,814 1,910 2,011 2,143 9,611 MTDB 10% Funds 6,131 6,420 6,758 7,116 7,581 34,006 5% Community Transit Services 4,051 4.949 4.465 4.701 5.008 22.467 TOTAL $91,100 $95,300 $100,300 $105,700 $112,500 $504,900 Notes: 1. Revenue forecasts are for planning purposes only. 2. Revenue distribution is based on Department of Finance population estimates as of January 1, 1999. 3. FY 2001 Apportionments based on County Auditor's estimate. 4. Regional Service Fund assessments for every year are based on the recommended assessment rate for FY 2001, pending future policy decisions on the actual assessment methodology. 5. The MTDB Bus Replacement Fund does not include contributions from the City of San Diego and the Regional Service fund, which wil be determined at a later date. 3/15/00 MTDB AREA UNALLOCATED TDA CARRYOVER AND UNSPENT TDA CAPITAL CLAIMS AND RESERVES as of March 23, 2000 Unallocated TDA Balances Amount of Jurisdiction Unallocated Funds Chula Vista Coronado El Cajon Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Poway City of San Diego Santee County MTDB Area Regional Service Fund $1,241,583 5,893 3,164,823 264,539 1,820,792 121,170 298,505 429,233 0 880,985 117,112 12,205 $8,356,840 Open TDA Capital Claims Jurisdiction Amount of Unspent Funds Chula Vista CTS Spring Valley Transit Center CTS Rural CTS Multi -Modal Terminal CTS Paratransit La Mesa Lemon Grove MTDB National City (1) $49,700 1,990,000 1,119,866 75,000 1,896 123,600 24,383 453,000 80,477 $3,917,922 TDA Capital Reserves (2) Claimant Amout of Unpaid Reserves CTS Suburban CTS Rural CTS Poway CTS Paratransit $3,757,048 520,588 745,895 81,601 $5,105,132 (1) Matching funds for procurement of paratransit vehicles. (2) Excludes MTDB Bus Capital Replacement Fund TDABalances3/27/00 BUS CAPITAL FUNL _ASH FLOW ($000) WITH INCREASING SHARES ASSUMING 50% CONTRIBUTION FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 TOTAL Sources of Funds Chula Vista Coronado El Cajon Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Poway Santee San Diego County Non-MTDB Contributions San Diego Regional Service Fund SUBTOTAL NA= No funding available TBD= To be determined City of San Diego FY01 funding determined by calculating local match for federal grant. $141 $146 $150 $155 $160 $20 $21 $22 $22 $23 $121 $125 $129 $133 $137 $110 $113 $117 $120 $123 $14 $14 $14 $14 $15 $53 $54 $56 $58 $59 $161 $166 $171 $176 $181 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70 $72 $74 $77 $79 $131 $135 $140 $144 $148 $821 $846 $872 $898 $924 $1,899 TBD TBD TBD TBD NA TBD TBD TBD TBD $2,720 I TBD TBD TBD TBD 3/14/00 $752 $108 $644 $583 $71 $280 $854 $0 $372 $699 $4,362 Attachment 1 FY 2001 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) APPORTIONMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE SAN DIEGO REGION (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (C) (H) (I) %of Total ADA Regional FY 2001 Apportiorunent Population Regional % of Area FY 2001 Funds Transit Service Available for Mat' Year Total Estimates' Population' Population' Apportionment per MTDBa Assessment Allocation(D-E-F) Carryover' Available NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD Incorporated Area 577,354 20.23% 74.70% County of San Diego 195,524 6.85% 25.30% Subtotal: 772,878 27.09% 100.00% $22,413,262 $0 $0 $22,413,262 $10,618,262 933,031,524 METROPLITAN TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD City of Chula Vista 166,945 5.85% 8.31% 4,357,226 47,627 909,325 3,400,273 2,852,683 6,252,956 City of Coronado 28,715 1.01% 1.43% 749,455 8,192 370,631 370,631 5,893 376,524 City of El Cajon 95,546 3.35% 4.76% 2,493,728 27,258 663,481 1,802,990 3,389,823 5,192,811 City of Imperial Beach 28,882 1.01% 1.44% 753,813 8,240 372,787 372,787 264,539 637,326 City of La Mesa 58,655 2.06% 2.92% 1,530,882 16,733 704,079 810,069 1,820,792 2,630,861 City of Lemon Grove 25,683 0.90% 1.28% 670,320 7,327 66,299 596,699 121,170 717,864 City of National City .54,961 1.93% 2.74% 1,434,469 15,680 141,879 1,276,911 298,505 1,575,416 City of Poway 48,393 1.70% 2.41% 1,263,046 13,806 62,462 1,186,778 470,344 1,657,122. City of San Diego 1,254,281 43.96% 62.45% 32,736,441 357,829 14,084,696 18,293,916 0 18,293,916 City of Santee 57,389 2.01% 2.867. 1,497,840 16,372 296,293 1,185,174 880,965 2,066,159 County of San Diego 189,057 6.63% 9.41% 4,934,344 53,935 844,311 4,036,098 117,112 4,153,210 Subtotal: 2,008,507 70.39% 100.00% $52,421,564 $573,000 $18,516,244 $33,332,320 $10,221,846 $43,554,166 NON -TRANSIT BOARD AREA, County of San Diego 71,873 2.52% $2,126,835 $0 $2,126,835 $392,554 $2,519,38'1 TOTALS: 2,853,258 100.00% $76,961,661 $18,516,244 $57,872,417 $21,232,662 579,105,079 99233.1 County Auditor Administrative Expenses 35,000 99233.1 SANDAG Administrative Expenses 375,000 99233.3 2% Pedestrian/ Bicycle Funds 1,813,800 99233.5(a) SANDAC 2%Planning Funds 1,732,749 99233.5(b) MTDB 10% Fonds 6,131,177 99233.7 5% Community Transit Services 4,050,614 591,100,000 (I) Population estimates, which are prepared by SANDAC, are consistent with the California Department of Finance estimates as of January 1, 1999. (2) Percentages have been rounded for reporting purposes. (3) By MTDB policy, funding to insure provision o(complementary paretransit services as required by the ADA is deducted prior to cal,-ulating the Regional Transit Service Assessment. (4) Regional Service Assessment carryover totals $12,205. (S) Inductee February 2000 TDA claim adjustments. Chula Vista Coronado El Cajon Imperial Beach La Mesa Lemon Grove National City Poway San Diego Santee County of San Diego ADA Funds "Off the Top' Regional Service Fund FY 2001 MTDB Area TDA Funds A Net FY 2001 Apportionment $ 3,400,273 370,631 1,802,990 372,787 810,069 596,694 1,276,911 1,186,778 18,293,916 1,185,174 4,036,098 573,000 18,516,244 B Capital Replacement Fund $ 141,000 20,000 121,000 110,000 14,000 53,000 161,000 1,899,000 70,000 131,000 NA C Balance Remaining (A-B) $ 3,259,273 350,631 1,681,990 262,787 796,069 543,694 1,115,911 1,186,778 16,394,916 1,115,174 3,905,098 18,516,244 D FY 2000 Total Available Carry-over for (C+D) $ 2,852,683 5,893 3,389,823 264,539 1,820.792 121,170 298,505 470,344 880,985 117.112 $ 6,111,956 356,524 5,071,813 527,326 2,616,861 664,864 1,414,416 1,657,122 16,394,916 1,996,159 4,022,210 12,205 18,528,449 Total $ 52,421,564 $ 2,720,000 $ 49,128,564 $10,234,051 $ 59,362,615 Note: Carry-over funds reflect SANDAG and MTDB Board actions through February 2000, including FY 1999 fiscal audit adjustments, with the exception of the audit adjustment forth the FY 1999 CTS Suburban claim. n REVISED FY 2001 STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUND ALLOCATION ESTIMATES Total FY 1999 Estimated Fund Revised FY FY 2000 Current Initial FY Available for Balances 2000 Estimate Allocations Balance 2001 Estimate FY 2001 Population Formula Allocations SANDAG Area $2,024,883 $1,051,978 $745,630 $2,331,231 $1,059,770 $3,391,001 MTDB Area $178,069 $3,179,632 $3,163,332 $194,369 $3,203,184 $3,397,553 Operator Revenue Formula Allocations County of San Diegot $ 97,484 $ 140,805 $ 166,040 $ 72,249 $ 141,849 $ 214,098 City of Chula Vista 15,862 47,990 35,579 28,273 48,345 76,618 City of El Cajon 51,592 - 51,579 13 13 City o La Mesa 18,003 1,368 - 19,371 1,378 20,749 City of Lemon Grove 5,138 , - - 5,138 5,138 City of National City 164,901 27,372 - 192,273 27,575 219,848 City of Poway 234 - 234 234 San Diego Transit Corporation 108,682 930,002 927,261 111,423 936,890 1,048,313 San Diego Trolley, Inc. 120,080 590,440 529,528 180,992 594,814 775,806 MTDB Contract Services 170,331 259,289 332,577 97,043 261,209 358,252 Total $ 752,307 $ 1,997,266 $ 2,042,564 $ 707,009 $ 2,012,060 $ 2,719,069 SANDAG Area NCTD $0 $616,370 $616,370 $0 $620,935 $620,935 'Includes $43,869 from SANDAG Area Operator Revenue Formula Funds for revenues earned prior to FY 1986, plus interest earnings through FY 1999. 1 ATTACHMENT B MTDB Metropolitan Transit Development Board Policies and Procedures No. 21 SUBJECT: ALLOCATION OF STATE TRANSIT ASSISTANCE FUNDS PURPOSE: Board Approval: 2/25/93 To establish procedures for allocating State Transit Assistance (STA) Funds in the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) area. BACKGROUND: PROCEDURE: The STA Program was created by SB 620 (Chapter 161) in 1979 and revised by AB 2551 (Chapter 322) in 1982, by both SB 300 (Chapter 105) and SB 1391 (Chapter 1232) in 1989, by the passage of Proposition 116 in 1990, and by AB 37 (Chapter 13), SB 3 (Chapter 35), SB 152 (Chapter 767), and SB 791 (Chapter 995) in 1991. This program provides an additional source of operating and capital funding for transit operators. Proposition 116 designated the Transportation Planning and Development (TP&D) Account of the State Transportation Fund as a trust fund. The funds transferred into the TP&D account each year may be appropriated by the legislature only for transportation planning and mass transportation purposes. Funds are appropriated "off the top" for state public transportation purposes including state planning, administrative, and research activities. Of the remaining funds, 50 percent is appropriated for bus and passenger rail services, programs to promote ridesharing, and funding of the Transit Capital Improvement (TCI) Program. The remaining 50 percent is allocated to have regional entities such as the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) and MTDB according to a population formula and half to regional entities to be allocated in turn to individual operators based on a revenue formula. 21.1 Funding Priorities In the allocation of STA monies to eligible operators, it is the intent of the legislature that MTDB give priority consideration to claims for the following purposes (PUC Section 99314.5(d)); 1. to offset reductions in federal operating assistance; 2. to offset unanticipated increases in the cost of fuel; Member Agencies: City of Chula Vista, City of Coronado. City of El Cajon. City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa. City of Lemon Grove, City of National City, City of Poway, City of San Diego. City of Santee. County of San Diego. State of California Metropolitan Transit Development Board is Coordinator of the Metropolitan Transit System and is Regulatory Authority for (Gl Paratransit Administration Subsidiary Corporations: ( San Diego Transit Corporation, I gill San Diego Trolley. Inc. and f • ) San Diego & ArizonaEasternRailway Company c�) 3. to enhance existing public transportation services; and 4. to meet high -priority regional, countywide, or areawide public transportation needs. 21.2 Required Findings MTDB is required to make all of the findings listed below before it can allocate funds to a claimant (California Code of Regulations (CCR) 6754). It is the responsibility of the claimant to provide MTDB with sufficient information upon which to make these findings. In order to allocate STA monies, MTDB must find that: 1. The claimant's proposed expenditures are in conformance with the Regional Transportation Plan. 2. The level of fare revenues proposed is sufficient to enable the operator or transit service claimant to meet the fare revenue requirements of PUC Sections 99268.2, 99268.3 99268.4, 99268.5, and 99268.9, as they may be applicable to the claimant. 3. The claimant is making full use of federal funds available under the Urban Mass Transportation Act of 1964, as amended. 4. The sum of the claimant's allocations from the STA fund and Local Transportation Funds does not exceed the amount the claimant is eligible to receive during the fiscal year (CCR 6634). Such finding, however, shall not relieve the claimant of its responsibility pursuant to CCR 6735. 5. Priority consideration has been given to claims to offset reductions in federal operating assistance and unanticipated increases in the cost of fuel, to enhance existing public transportation services, and to meet high -priority regional, countywide, or areawide public transportation needs. 6. The operator has made a reasonable effort to implement the productivity improvements recommended pursuant to PUC Section 99244. This finding shall make specific reference to the improvements recommended and to the efforts made by the operator to implement them. 7. For operating cost claims, the operator is not precluded by any contract entered into on or after June 28, 1979 from employing part-time drivers or from contracting with common carriers of persons operating under a franchise or license (PUC Section 99314.5(c)). However, no person who was a full-time employee of an operator on June 28, 1979 shall have his or her employment terminated or his or her regular hours of employment, excluding overtime, reduced by the operator as a result of it employing part- time drivers or contracting with those common carriers. -2- 8. The operator has been certified within the last 13 months by the California Highway Patrol to be in compliance with Section 1808.1 of the Vehicle Code. 9. The operator is in compliance with the eligibility requirements of PUC Section 99314.6. 21.3 Funding Eligibility and Qualifying Criteria In the San Diego region, claims may be filed by eligible Article 4 operators for public transportation purposes and by eligible Article 4.5 claimants for community transit services (PUC Section 99314.5 (a) and (e)). In addition to meeting the required findings discussed under Section 21.2 of this Policy, STA claimants are required to meet additional qualifying criteria (PUC Section 99314.6), as revised by SB 3 (Chapter 35, 1991). These requirements state that neither population nor operator revenue formula funds shall be allocated to an STA claimant for operating purposes unless the claimant meets one of two efficiency standards: 1. The first standard is that an operator's total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour for the most recent audited year does not exceed the same factor for the preceding year by more than the percentage change in the San Diego Regional Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the same period. 2. The second factor requires that the three-year average of an operator's total operating cost per revenue vehicle hour for the last three audited years does not exceed the average of the three years preceding the most recent audited year by more than the average percentage change in the CPI for the three- year period. MTDB may adjust the calculation of these standards to exclude start-up costs for new services (as in PUC Section 99268.8) for a period of not more than two years and/or cost increases beyond the change in the CPI for fuel, alternative fuel programs, insurance or state and federal mandates. Any funds which are withheld from an operator due to a failure to meet the qualifying criteria shall be retained by MTDB for reallocation to that operator for two years following the year of ineligibility. If the operator does not become eligible to receive an allocation during the following two years, then, in the third year, the funds shall be reallocated to cost-effective, high priority regional transit activities as determined by MTDB, or the funds shall revert to the State Controller for reallocation statewide. 21.4 Submittal Content for MTDB STA Claims Claims for STA allocation are to be submitted to MTDB by April 1 for consideration for allocations for the ensuing fiscal year. Claims for STA population formula funds filed after April 1 will be considered only for those monies which remain unallocated and available after action is taken on previously submitted claims. STA claims may be filed separately, or combined with the TDA claim provided that the -3- additional information required for STA claims is included. Each STA claim should include the following: 1. The annual STA claim form. 2. A proposed budget for the fiscal year of the claim and a statement of estimated revenues and expenditures for the prior fiscal year. The items in these statements are to be consistent with the State Controller's Uniform System of Accounts. These statements are to be accompanied by a statement signed by the claimant's chief financial officer attesting to their reasonableness and accuracy (CCR 6734). Forms A-10, A-20, A-21, A-22, and A-23 of the SANDAG/MTDB Regional Reporting System should be used to satisfy the budget and prior year's statement requirements. An additional requirement of CCR 6734 is that these financial statements should include a specific identification of the estimated amount of the claimant's maximum eligibility for monies from the LTF and the STAF, as defined in CCR 6634. 3. A copy of Form A-40 to provide a statement of the claimant's efforts to implement the recommended productivity improvements. 4. A statement verifying that the operator is not precluded from employing part-time drivers or from contracting with common carriers operating under a franchise or license, if the operator has entered into a contract on or after July 28, 1979 (include a copy of the contract). 5. Sufficient information to permit MTDB to make the required findings listed above. 21.5 Timetable The following timetable lists the key dates in the annual cycle of preparing STA claims, allocating funds, and submitting required reports. Date Action January 10 State Controller provides MTDB with a preliminary estimate of the amount of STA monies to be allocated to it during the fiscal year (CCR 6720). April 1 Claimants file STA claims with MTDB (CCR 6732). June 30 MTDB conveys allocation resolution to the County Auditor (CCR 6752). August 1 State Controller provides MTDB with a revised estimate of STA monies to be allocated to it during the fiscal year -4- September 28 Quarterly BJB:paw/ky P0LICY21 2/12/93 (CCR 6720). Each claimant submits the annual report of its operations to MTDB and the State Controller (PUC Section 99243). State Controller allocates STA monies to claimants (CCR 6720). Original Policy approved on 1 /10/83. This Policy supersedes Policy dated March 7, 1985. -5- ATTACHMENT C Metropolitan Transit Development Board MTDB tiny V SUBJECT: PURPOSE: Policies and Procedures No. 43 Board Approval: NEW AND EXISTING SERVICE EVALUATION To establish: 1 /13/00 1. A process for evaluating existing transit service, as well as identifying service changes to improve performance. 2. A process for evaluating and assigning implementation priority among proposed new and expanded transit services. BACKGROUND: This policy provides an objective set of procedures that can be utilized to evaluate service changes. It allows such changes to be considered on the basis of efficiency and effectiveness without regard to which geographic area is being served. An annual process is described for evaluating existing service and potential service changes for inclusion in the annual Short -Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The review will also provide input into the five-year budget process. This process would be used to identify services or areas that could benefit from service restructuring, route segment analysis, marketing, or enhanced frequencies. Routes would be designated into several separate categories, based on service area characteristics. These categories include: suburban feeder, urban feeder, line -haul, crosstown, all -day express, peak express, and commuter express. Four performance factors would be used in the evaluation process: passengers per revenue hour, passengers per revenue mile, subsidy per passenger, and passenger miles per seat mile. This policy would also be used to prioritize new services. Potential new services would be evaluated based on three factors: passengers per revenue hour, passengers per revenue mile, and subsidy per passenger. A continuous index, based on the ratio of a given route's performance in these specific measures to the average of all routes in that service category along with the individual measures, is used as the evaluation tools in both the new and existing service evaluation. This policy applies to all Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) bus operators providing service in the MTDB area. Member Agencies: City of Chula Vista. City of Coronado. City of El Cajon. City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa, City of Lemon Grove, City of National City. City of Poway,City of San Diego. City of Santee, County of San Diego, State of California Metropolitan Transit Development Board is Coordinator of the Metropolitan Transit System and is Regulatory Authority for Paratransit Administration (66 Subsidiary Corporations: San Diego Transit Corporation, San Diego Trolley, Inc. and San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Company POLICY: Existing Service Evaluation Methodology This policy details three levels of service evaluation. Each level requires a varying level of analysis and corresponding action (Attachment A). 43.1 Trip -Level Analysis. Trip -level analysis is done as part of the ongoing service evaluation process. This analysis uses passenger complaints, field reports, and operator input to determine where minor adjustments could be made to the existing system. Adjustments are then identified that would remedy trips that are chronically late, overcrowded, or offer poor transfer connections. Service adjustments in this category could be handled at the operator's discretion and are not subject to Board approval. 43.2 Route -Level Analysis. Once a year, an annual route monitoring report is compiled. This report provides detailed route -level analyses that measure service productivity, cost-effectiveness, and subsidy levels. Each route is compared to all others in its service category (e.g., line -haul, crosstown, express, dial -a -ride, etc.) using the category average and a continuous index. The continuous index is based upon the ratio of a route's performance on a givenspecific measure to the average of all routes in that service category. The index uses four performance measures in compiling the average for a route. The four measures include: passengers per revenue mile, passengers per revenue, hour, subsidy per passenger, and passenger miles per seat mile. Routes fall into four tiers of evaluation: • Average/Above Average (1.0 or above) — Routes that fall within this category are performing generally satisfactory and trigger no additional analysis. However, a route in this tier is not precluded from special analysis if some operating aspect is felt to require improvement. • Ongoing Monitoring (0.99 - 0.75) — Routes that fall within this category are performing slightly below the systemwide average but are generally assumed to meet a marginal performance level. These routes require no action, but ongoing monitoring is needed to ensure that the level of performance doesn't decline. • Evaluate (0.74 - 0.50) — Routes that fall within this category are performing well below the systemwide average. They require some level of evaluation. A route -segment analysis may be required, which evaluates the route by time of day and route segment to determine where service improvements can be made. • Action (0.49 or below) — Routes that fall within this category are performing at half the systemwide average and measurable action is required. Steps that can be taken include major route restructuring, fare restructuring, or route elimination. -2- The existing evaluation process will also provide input into the five-year budget process. MTDB has rarely eliminated entire routes in the past, and route elimination would be a last resort under this policy. Individual routes that are designated for elimination would be subjected to a lifeline services review. This review would evaluate population density thresholds in the route's service area (to determine if there is adequate population to support the route), proximity to other transit services, and level of access in the absence of the route to key destination points within the community. It should be noted that high levels of transit utilization are nearly always observed in transit -dependent neighborhoods. In conjunction with the annual route -level analysis, a three-year rolling average will be completed to determine if the averages within the year being analyzed are reflective of how a category has been performing over time. Both the relative average of the four measures and any anomalies in the results of each of the four measures will be used to trigger further review or action on a particular route. New Service Evaluation 43.3 Regional and Subregional Analysis. Regional and subregional planning studies are conducted on an annual basis to focus on possible improvements in service coverage, efficiency, and connectivity. These improvements can result in major service additions and changes. These changes will be evaluated as part of the new service evaluation. 43.4 New Service Evaluation. The process for evaluation of new transit services will incorporate these elements: • the services must be described in sufficient detail to be able to estimate cost, revenue, revenue miles of operation, and ridership; and • those new service proposals not included in the SRTP will not be evaluated. 43.5 New services subjected to this policy include the following: • New bus routes • Extensions of existing routes • Any frequency or span -of -service improvements to existing routes that result in an increase in projected operating cost or mileage • Other new services (demand -responsive, employee shuttles, etc.) 43.6 Evaluation Guidelines. Development of the proposed new services will be guided as follows: -3- 43.6a Cost estimation will rely on existing unit costs for similar types of service. Fully allocated costs will be used for new routes. For existing route extensions and frequency or span -of -service improvements, the marginal cost of service expansion, plus an overhead factor of 15 percent will be used. 43.6b MTDB's ridership estimation model will be used to project patronage. MTDB operations and planning staff will review all ridership estimates to ensure reasonableness. Ridership diversion from existing routes will be considered on a case -by -case basis. Revenue estimation will rely on the average fare for similar existing types of service. The model considers transfer opportunities to other bus routes or to the trolley, thus taking account of transit network factors. 43.6c Marketing efforts will be undertaken for all new services. These efforts are not specified in the policy because different markets of potential riders will require use of a variety of techniques. 43.7 Evaluation Procedure. The procedure for evaluating the new service proposals will use the continuous index as described above for existing services. 43.7a To qualify for implementation, a new route or expanded service must meet or exceed 0.50 to 0.75 of the systemwide average. Within 24 months, the route must increase its performance to within 0.75 to 0.99 of the systemwide average. 43.7b All new routes or extensions_ would be categorized as trial routes. They would not be considered part of the overall system until they had been in service for two years and/or reached the 0.75 to 0.99 performance levels. Ongoing evaluation would be conducted throughout the first 24 months that the service is in place. Quarterly reports on the status of these routes would be provided to the Board as part of the ongoing quarterly operations reports. Board action will be required to retain these services. 43.7c Implementation of selected new services will be integrated into the annual budget development process, which is expected to yield a specific funding level for new routes/service enhancements. The highest-ranking proposal will be implemented first, followed by the next highest and so on until available funding is exhausted. In cases where a choice must be made between proposals of equal rank in different service categories, it is appropriate to consider other policy goals in selecting a proposal for implementation. Trial routes that meet the minimum criteria of this policy but cannot be implemented due to funding limitations can be carried over to the next fiscal year for reevaluation and reranking. 43.7d The time frame for evaluation is two years, with interim six-month and one-year targets established by MTDB staff based on analysis of market growth curves for similar types of service. -4- 43.7e At the end of the evaluation time frame, the Board must act to include the service as a permanent part of the transit system. If the Board does not vote to make the service part of the regular system, the service will not be continued. A decision not to continue a trial project would not require a public hearing. MTDB staff can propose early acceptance of a trial project as a permanent part of the transit system if the service's performance meets its targets before the end of the two-year evaluation time frame. MTDB staff can also propose early discontinuation of a trial route if its early performance is well below expected levels. 43.7f Both the relative average of the three factors and any anomalies in any of the three factors can trigger further review or action. 43.8 Funding. Outside funding contributed to the operation of the route will not be considered in revenue calculations. It will be the decision of the Board to determine what role the additional revenue will play in the implementation of a new route. Any new route implemented as a result of outside funding will be considered a trial route as long as outside funding is used to support it. 43.9 Ferry Services. On an annual basis, a peer analysis of similar ferry services will be conducted. This analysis will be used to determine how San Diego's ferry service is performing compared to other similar services. PSmith POLICY43.JWILLI 1/7/00 Attachment: A. Summary of Evaluation Procedures and Measures for Transit Service Modifications Original Policy Accepted on 4/08/93 Policy Revised on 12/8/94 Policy Repealed and Readopted on 1/13/00 -5- OPERATOR: National City Transit TAB' FY 2001-2005 MTDB SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN OPERATION PROGRAM DETAILS DATE COMPLETED: 04/28/00 PREPARED BY: Noe Valdez Please list all routes and indicate any major service modifications (defined as a greater than 15% change in any routes daily revenue miles of service), new routes, and route deletions planned over the FY 2001-2005 period which are induded in your Operating Program. Please indicate information on an annual basis even if route change is to be implemented in mid -year. If no route changes are planned for a route, indicate' no change' in the appropriate column. Project Description Implementation Date (Month and Fiscal Year) Type of Change' Annual Operating Cost Annual Pa�senners ptal Annual Revenue Hours Annual Revenue Miles Annual Fare Revenue Annual Total Subsidy Additional Vehicle Requirements (Quantity and Type) Rationale Add bus on Route 603 on Sunday 7/FY/02 Added Service $4,451.00 416 4867 One 40' Bus To improve reliability '-New route, route deletion, service modification. TABLE1.MBRUSS.XLS FY01-05 OP -REQUEST 4/28/00 TABLE 2 (continued) FY 2001-2005 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN OPERATING AND CAPITAL FUNDING PLAN OPERATOR: National City Transit DATE COMPLETED: 4/28/00 PREPARED BY: Noe Valdez LEVEL OF SERVICE: 1st Year FY 2001 2nd Year FY 2002 3rd Year FY 2LI13 4th Year FY 2004 5th Year FY 2005 1 Vehicles Available 14 20 20 20 20 2 Revenue Passengers (000's) 1,540,532.00 1,586,748.00 1,634,350.00 1,683,380.00 1,733,882.00 3 Total Passengers (000's) 2,110,317.00 2,173,627.00 2,238,835.00 2,306,000.00 2,375,180.00 4 Revenue Miles (000's) 451,372.00 464,913.00 478,861.00 493,226.00 508,023.00 5 Total Miles (000's) 469,122.00 483,196.00 497,692.00 512,622.00 528,000.00 6 Revenue Hours 000's 43,480.00 44,784.00 46,128.00 47,512.00 48,937.00 . .'., : .. .....:..... } y'a .{{ `{�;`,�C:�A`u{: 'i���'�..:�.:,.': f:,�,,.�V`.;,,,,,�k,,.`f,'{{:af{x::{:.L..`v�1:.v�:r.:x:J.R.:c::..:,;...x� i.,•r ., `.,.`.:.�.trnc,,..�:\`.i!M t\ n:h;.,, , v {,y,Y;a,ct. .v. {,.::6`. „-n{{(?555,.`.`§, v{,{{o-\'x.... y 3�:. ., ,,.r. �yti-Ca�;{.-.bAf{#:e,•, 2 r7x{,`;,\J:�.k``.,`E,''•ZII,',.\.,.:x:.��`{.��..;\`:{:.:.;L\5.-'ht\..`•5.,-��:A\`:.5.'�`l;r: h:{�:.. :.. ,{k .:� ; .l {{{J�g9. " {+a ,v. `..A.zl:,!•{.ttt;aS:: e:; °•:5: C •• ,: k wai 10 Passenger Fares 1,175,102.00 1,210,355.00 1,246,666.00 1,284,066.00 1,322,588.00 11 TDAArticle4.0 & 8.0 Total 1,116,000.00 1,120,000.00 1,182,000.00 1,248,000.00 1,338,000.00 12 County MTDB Area 13 County Non -Board Area 14 Coronado 15 Chula Vista 16 El Cajon 17 Imperial Beach 18 La Mesa 19 Lemon Grove 20 National City 1,116,000.00 1,120,000.00 1,182,000.00 1,248,000.00 1,338,000.00 21 Poway 22 San Diego 57,464.00 59,188.00 60,963.00 62,792.00 64,676.N 23 Santee 24 Regional Services Fund 25 NCTD 26 MTDB 29 TDA Article 4.5 30 Local 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 31 Tolls (1-15, Bridge) 32 STA Formula . 33 STA Discretionary 34 FTA Section 5307 or 5309 35 Investment Earnings 36 Advertising Revenue 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 6,000.00 37 Miscellaneous 43 Total Operating Funds 2,354,566.00 2,395,543.00 2,495,629.00 2,600,858.00 2,731,264.00 45 Less Operating Costs �CeKEH�v :hrN`ivg 2,354,566.00 sv \g ^ 2,395,543.00 Rtt w«wx 2,495,629.00 mv \F„...{:pwk, 7' 2,600,858.00 •4' "l} ,l£'`tYri --�w {ary 5,v:•-�{:xE.y v"viwx4Nt{�a7 2,731,264.00 CLi nov ; XX0.RRNwya K—!g.x?@"J uA\vZC� vwmw\\w v.x :w.. vevmiv 50 TDA Article 4.0 & 8.0 Total 52 County MTDB Area 53 County Non -Board Area 54 Coronado 55 Chula Vista 56 El Cajon 57 Imperial Beach 58 La Mesa 59 Lemon Grove 61 Poway 62 San Diego 4/28/00 OPERATOR: TABLE 2 (continued) FY 2001-2005 SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN OPERATING AND CAPITAL FUNDING PLAN DATE COMPLETED: PREPARED BY: LEVEL OF SERVICE: 1st Year FY 2001 2nd Year FY 2002 3rd Year FY 2003 4th Year 5th Year FY 2004 FY 2005 63 Santee 64 Regional Services Fund 65 NCTD 66 MTDB 67 TDA Article 4.5 70 Local 1/2 Cent Sales Tax 71 Tolls (1-15, Bridge) 72 STA Formula 73 STA Discretionary 74 TP&D/ART XIX (Guideway) 77 FTA Section 5307 78 FTA Section 5309 79 FTA Section 5310 82 FAU Transit 85 Sales/Leaseback 86 Other 90 Annual Programmed Funds 91 Previous Year's Capital Reserve Total Capital Funds Less Ca.italFunds r96 Total Capital Reserve - TABLE2.MBRUSS.XLS FY01-05 OP -REQUEST 4/28/00 TABLE 3 OPERATOR: National City Transit FY 2001.2005 MTDB SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN TRANSIT CAPITAL PROGRAM AND CASH FLOW EXPENDITURE PLAN (multi -year projects) DATE COMPLETED: 4/28/00 PREPARED BY: Noe Valdez Project Description Quantity Phase* Total Cost Project Funding ($000's) Project (Fiscal Year) Comments TDA Prior Year Reserve Current Year TDA STA TransNet Sales Tax Other Other Bus wash 1 65 65 FY01 Building Structure 1 20 20 FY01 Shop Equipment 10 10 FY01 Engine Overhaul 2 42 42 FY01 Alt. Fuel Svc. Vehicle 1 25 25 FY02 Resurface Parking Lot 1 60 60 FY02 Upgrade Sprinkler Sys. 1 9 9 FY02 Upgrade Security Sys. 1 9 9 FY02 Shop Equipment 10 10 FY02 Engine Overhaul 1 25 25 FY02 Alt. Fuel Svc. Vehicle 1 28 28 FY03 Office Furniture 1 5 5 FY03 Service Truck 1 30 30 FY03 Water Recycler 1 25 25 FY04 Perimeter Security Fence 1 18 18 FY04 Shop Equipment 1 10 10 FY04 Office Furniture 1 5 5 FY05 Shop Equipment 1 10 10 FY05 * - E = Engineering & Planning; R = right-of-way; C = Construction; T = Total TABLE3.MBRUSS.XLS City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE 05-J9-00 3 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES TO PROVIDE FAMILY VIOLENCE RESPONSE TEAM SERVICES TO COMMUNITY MEMBERS AT SCENES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE. PREPARED Y A. L. DiCerchio DEPARTMENT Police Chief of Police EXPLANATION. South Bay Community Services (SBCS) has received funding from the Department of Social Services in order to provide youth and family counselors, who are members of the Family Violence Response Team (FVRT), to families involved in domestic violence where children are present. The service will be on a 24- hour/7 days a week "on call" basis in which the counselor is immediately available to respond in approximately 20 minutes. The purpose of the FVRT is to be available to law enforcement officers to immediately respond to all family violence cases where there are children and assess the needs and safety of all children in the household as well as the victim, and then provide needed services and follow-up. The FVRT is currently working in Chula Vista with an agreement with the Chula Vista Police Department. SBCS recently received additional funding to expand the services to National City and Imperial Beach. SBCS is authorized to give National City Police Department a sum of $11,500 to fund any expenses involved in the child assessment training that FVRT members will give to Police Department personnel. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement It this Resolution is approved, the Police Department will be paid the described funds from South Bay Community Services. This program will not incur any costs to the City's existing FY2000/2001 budget. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No 2000-56 - Resolution - South Bay Cowuiunity Services Concept Paper A-200 (Rev. 9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 56 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO ENTER INTO A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES TO PROVIDE FAMILY VIOLENCE RESPONSE TEAM SERVICES TO COMMUNITY MEMBERS AT SCENES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WHEREAS, South Bay Community Services ("SBCS") has received additional funding from the Department of Social Services to expand its Family Violence Response Team ("FVRT"), which is already working with the Chula Vista Police Department, to National City and Imperial Beach; and WHEREAS, members of the FVRT are youth and family counselors that provide services to families involved in domestic violence where children are present; and WHEREAS, FVRT services will be on a 24 hour, 7 days a week "on call" basis in which the counselor is available to law enforcement to respond in approximately 20 minutes to all family violence cases where there are children present, assess the needs and safety of all children in the household as well as the victim, and provide immediate follow-up; and WHEREAS, SBCS is authorized to give the National City Police Department $11,500 to fund any expenses involved in the child assessment training that FVRT members will give to Police Department personnel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the Chief of Police is authorized to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with South Bay Community Services to provide Family Violence Response Team Services to community members at scenes of domestic violence. Said Memorandum of Understanding is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: ?E Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk George H. Eiser, Ill City Attorney MENORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING Between NATIONAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT And SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES This represents an agreement between National City Police Department (NCPD) and South Bay Community Services (SBCS) to work together toward the mutual goal of preventing child abuse in National City. NCPD and SBCS intend to participate as partners in the California Department of Social Services' Coordinated Family Violence Response Team proposal, as described herein. To this end, each agency agrees to participate in the program by coordination and/or providing the following: Responsibilities of the National City Police Department: Participate in the Family Violence Response Team (FVRT) as described in the attached Exhibit (A). Participate in Child Abuse Risk Assessment training provided by the Department of Social Services Children Services Bureau and SBCS Community Assessment Workers. Upon responding to a family violence call in cases where children are involved, provide assessment and call the FVRT member. Participate in periodic meetings with the collaborative partners to enhance optimal project effectiveness and utilization. Provide cooperation and information for evaluation and measurement of this project. Responsibilities of South Bay Community Services: Act as the lead agency for administration and management of this project. Provide the Community Assessment Workers for the Family Violence Response Team 24 hours/7 days a week. Participate in periodic meetings with all the collaborative partners to ensure optimal project effectiveness and utilization. Remit the sum of $11,500 to NCPD to fund the familiarization training of Police Department personnel in Child Abuse Risk Assessment. Terms of this Agreement: This Agreement will be effective on June 19, 2000, time by either party to this agreement. The sum of $ 2000. ontinue indefinitely, and can be terminated at any is to be paid by SBCS to NCPD by June 19, Anthony L. DiCerchio K- t Lembo Chief of Police : utive Director National City Police Department South Bay Community Services South Bay Community Services Concept Paper SOUTH BAY FAMILY VIOLENCE RESPONSE TEAM This is a proposal to expand South Bay Family Violence Response Team (FVRT) project in Chula Vista to the nearby cities of National City and Imperial Beach. The current FVRT consists of a collaboration between SBCS, the Chula Vista Police Department, the State Department of Social Services, and San Diego County Health and Human Services' South Region Child Protective Services, with supportive services provided by SBCS' Shelter & Support Services Team and Children's Hospital South Bay Home Support Project, YMCA Family Stress Counseling Services, Home Start, and the BEACON Center Family Resource Center. The current project addresses the causal link between domestic violence and child abuse. The purpose for the Family Violence Response Team is to be available to Law Enforcement Officers to immediately respond to all Family Violence cases where there are children and assess the needs and safety of all children in the household as well as the victim, and then provide needed services and follow-up. The proposed expansion recognizes that SBCS and National City Police Department have already been working together to create a referral system for domestic violence cases, and that consequently additional staff are already needed to handle the increase of referrals to SBCS Family Violence Prevention team staff. In addition, in recognition of the number of domestic violence cases in the Imperial Beach area and of the number of child abuse cases related to intimate partner violence, preliminary agreements have been reached with Captain Dave Bliss at the Sheriffs Department in Imperial Beach about collaboration between SBCS, Child Protective Services, and the Sheriffs Department to provide this "first response" system to Imperial Beach DV cases where there are children in the home. SBCS has a dose working relationship with both the National City Police Department and the Sheriffs Department, as well as collaborative relationships with Family Resource Centers in National City and Imperial Beach that are part of an existing network of services and supports available to all SBCS clients. These relationships and collaborations make it easier to place staff close to the domestic violence referral sources and begin work immediately when funds are available. The existence of these relationships and collaborations create an immediate safety net for victims of domestic violence and their children referred to the Family Violence Response Team. We currently house domestic violence victims in confidential shelter in Imperial Beach. The purpose for the expanded FVRT is to be available to the NCPD and the Sheriffs Department to immediately respond to all Family Violence cases where there are children and assess the needs and safety of all children in the household as well as the victim, and then provide needed services and follow-up. The FVRT Community Assessment Workers who respond are trained in the Fresno Risk Assessment Model for Child Abuse Risk Assessment. San Diego HHSA Children's Services is willing to provide the Fresno Risk Assessment Training for Law Enforcement Officers, so they understand Child Protective Services' risk assessment process and how this affects the children. Additionally, training at Roll Call covers the roles and responsibilities of the Community Assessment Workers and how they can be of assistance to the responding officers at a domestic violence scene where there are children. Sequence of services and activities: A SBCS Immediate Response Community Assessment Worker is immediately available to the responding officer to meet the officer at the initial call. The Immediate Response availability of these workers is construed to mean from 15-20 minutes, and is provided 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. The CAW arrives at the home (or other dv scene where children are present), assesses the needs of the child(ren) and victim, talks to them about their immediate and long-term safety and helps them develop appropriate immediate safety plans and a follow-up service plan. If it is determined that a child has been abused and/or is in immediate danger, the Children's Protective Services is called and the child is removed from the home and placed in Polinsky Center. Alternatively, if it is appropriate, the child(ren) and mother are placed in SBCS' confidential domestic violence shelter. If there is no immediate danger to the child(ren), after assessing for risk and developing the safety plans, a law enforcement cross report and a follow-up report is sent to the Children's Protective Services. If the victim and child(ren) are placed in shelter they are immediately teamed with a Youth & Family Development Associate who will work with them on a comprehensive family -centered strengths -based assessment, identify with the family their needs and jointly develop a long term plan. If there is no shelter placement needed, following the initial contact by the Immediate Response Community Assessment Worker, the family will be referred to a SBCS Youth & Family Development Associate the next day to follow up and arrange for further services and resources, either by phone or during a home visit. Currently, if the victim does not contact SBCS to follow through on services, CPS' Initial Services Staff make an in -person visit based on the referral generated by the law enforcement cross report and CAW's follow-up report, to assess for risk to children of child abuse, and to urge 1 EXHIBIT "A" South Bay Community Services Concept Paper acceptance of service referrals. Some victims have no phone and therefore can't (or don't) wish to follow through on further services. In addition, many dv victims believe that once a call is made and the police respond, there will be no further problems since the crisis is past. CPS' subsequent follow-up is often important in generating follow- up services for these domestic violence victims, even if a petition has to be filed when the situation warrants. Currently SBCS staff and CPS communicate daily and/or weekly on these cases and that will continue for the two new law enforcement jurisdictions. The working relationship and communication between CPS and law enforcement should increase as it has with the Chula Vista Police Department. Follow-up services (for those in or not in shelter) might consist of Parenting groups through SBCS or Children's Hospital Home Support Project, English or Spanish victim support groups through SBCS, children's group counseling (SBCS), referral to YMCA Family Stress Counseling Services if there has been sexual abuse of the child, connection with a Family Mentor through Home Start at the BEACON Family Resource Center, individual counseling for victim and/or child(ren) (SBCS), assistance in obtaining a Temporary Restraining Order (SBCS), accompaniment to Court (SBCS), connection with a Parent Pal (IB or NC), and/or affordable housing placement or assistance (through SBCS' Community Development Department). SBCS also operates a Court Certified Batterers' Treatment program that is offered to the perpetrator immediately or through follow-up contact. There are currently more than 25 of these groups being facilitated at SBCS. By virtue of the initial contact with the immediate response person and contact from the YFDA upon follow-up, the client has gained access to a wide array of services, support and resources through the Family Violence Response Team, consistent with SBCS' wraparound philosophy of service provision. Project Coordination: The Director of the Family Wellness & Self -Sufficiency Department meets weekly (and other times as needed) with project staff to ensure smooth program implementation, and meets on a quarterly basis with the members of the FVRT collaborative to evaluate progress and discuss any systemic barriers to project implementation. SBCS' Youth & Family Development Associate (who is placed at the CVPD full time) meets monthly with the South Region Child Protective Services for case consultation and program evaluation, as well as daily or weekly as individual cases demand. Issues involving coordination with the CVPD are addressed on a daily basis, since the FDA is in house at the CVPD and works closely with CVPD staff. SBCS Staff from other Departments are placed at the National City Family Resource Center at Kimball School and the National City Police Department, so the Domestic Violence reports are picked up at the NCPD and hand carried by staff to FVRT staff at SBCS' main site. Domestic Violence victims from' National City are already taking advantage of a victims group in Spanish. With the proposed expansion staff can be placed in National City to respond to domestic violence calls along with the officers, and on -call staff will be added to increase the 24-hour capability. Another victims' group can also be started if the need becomes apparent. Even now with SBCS staff responding solely by phone the Department is experiencing an increase in domestic violence calls, because people now know there will be some follow-up. FVRT staff can be stationed either at the Sheriff's Department or at the Family Resource Center by Central Elementary School in Imperial Beach. When not accompanying a Sheriff's Deputy on a domestic violence call, staff will be following up on previous cases, counseling victims and their children, facilitating a victim's support group and/or a children's group, developing treatment plans, or providing other supportive services that are available. The increase in services between 8:30 PM and 8:30 AM, when regular staff are not on duty, will be managed by increasing 24 hour on -call staff hours. Outcome: For the community: The outcome is a permanent community collaboration of public and private agencies providing immediate response and focused comprehensive follow-up services for child and adult victims of family violence. This program adds to a strong, already existing family violence collaboration in the South Bay. This project enables us to expand our capacity to provide a wide array of supportive confidential, culturally appropriate follow-up services to domestic violence victims and their families as well as the perpetrators of the violence. All of these are part of our commitment to help plan and coordinate a more comprehensive community response to children in family violence cases. For the victims, their children, and the perpetrators: Through this project children's groups and services have increased, as has individual therapy for children and ongoing home support. Current staff are in place taking family violence referrals at the CVPD, as well as the phone referrals from NCPD and providing follow-up for both; providing shelter for adolescents and families with children; providing domestic violence victims' groups; assisting clients in obtaining Temporary Restraining Orders in collaboration with the South County Domestic Violence Task Force; and providing children's groups. Though safety planning is a part of the first contact in the home, it is also included throughout the client's contact with the program, and is utilized in the Children's groups as well as with the adults. It is important to note that safety plans are also developed with the perpetrators in the Court -ordered Batterers' groups, The Batterers need to understand that they must develop a plan to control their anger in order 2 EXHIBIT "A" South Bay Community Services Concept Paper for their partners to be safe and for them to avoid further contact with the Police. Therefore, overall, children and their mothers have a greater feeling of safety and a better sense of their connection to the community instead of being isolated. They have the support of peers in groups while they develop a better sense of self and work toward self-sufficient lifestyles. DV perpetrators have a year -long class in which they have the opportunity to form new non-violent behavioral habits with the support of groups facilitators. All of the services are offered in Spanish as well as English. This proposal will allow SBCS to expand coverage by Immediate Response Community Assessment Workers to National City and Imperial Beach. It has always been SBCS' plan to expand coverage to the whole South Region, so eventually we will be able to expand to San Ysidro as well. EXHIBIT "A" City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE 05/09/00 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #44 PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE EXPLANATION. Ratification of Warrant Register #44 per Government Section Code 37208. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A Acco 't No. STA_FF RECOMMENDATION I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $179,582.62 BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) 1. Warrant Register #44 2. Workers' Comp Warrant Register dated 04/26/00 Resolution No. A-200 (Rev. 9/80) MEETING DATE May 9, 2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT * REFER 'B) ITEM #1 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION: APPROVING THE DRAFT 2000-05 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND 2000-01 ANNUAL PLAN, INCLUDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT (HOME) PROGRAMBUDGETS PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Paul Desrochers CDC EXPLANATION See attached "Explanation." Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The City will receive $633,000 in HOME and $1,411,000 in CDBG funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development for 2000-01. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Council approve the draft 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and 2000-01 Annual Plan including proposed CDBG and HOME programs' budgets; and authorize CDC staff to submit said plans to Los Angles HUD Field Office for approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION CDBG and HOME recommendations from the Housing and Community Development Committee (HCDC) are listed in Attachments Nos. 2 and 3 of this report. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 2000-57 1. Proof of Publication (Public Hearing Notice) 2. Recommendations from HCDC and CDC Staff (CDBG). 3. Recomendations from HCDC and CDC Staff (HOME) 4. 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and 2000-01 Annual Plan (draft previously distributed). A-200 (9/8&) i.onsoiidatt Plen Nowbovic,-fcanraira� _ a1i appa..a ien, P. edj. 6. Previous year's status report — CDBG. EXPLANATION CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 9, 2000 (Continued) On April 25, 2000, the City Council received public comment and testimony from several community organizations in regard to proposed capital projects and public service programs, as well as the draft 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and 2000-01 Annual Plan (CPAP) documents (Please see Attachment No. 4). Per HUD regulations, the City must hold a 30-day comment period for the public to review the CPAP documents and to make comments or suggest changes. This 30-day period started April 8, 2000 and ended May 8, 2000. Both CDBG and HOME recommendations have been provided for Council consideration by the Housing & Community Development Committee and CDC staff (Attachments 2 and 3). Please see the following project descriptions and comments for the CDBG and HOME Programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Summary of Recommended Budget for 2000-01 Administration & Planning $ 85,000 Public Services $ 211,650 Community Projects $ 102,500 City CIP $1 011,850 Total $1,411,000 Administration & Planning Staff is recommending $75,000 for the expenses related to the general coordination, supervision, and management of the CDBG Program. A half-time accountant in the Finance Department is funded by a portion of these funds. This amount ($75,000) represents only 5% of entire CDBG grant. Per CDBG regulations, the City is allowed to utilize up to a maximum of 20% or $282,200 on Administration & Planning. HUD requires facilitation of a Fair Housing Program for all cities receiving CDBG funds. Staff is recommending that the City Council set -aside $10,000 for this purpose. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 1 of 4 Public Services For the Public Services category of the budget, a total of $211,650 or 15% of the CDBG grant can be spent on public services. This year, staff is recommending that the entire 15% be allocated with funding going to several non-profit programs, the CDC Nutrition Program, the COPS Program, and other City services. It is important to be clear on the impact that Public Service programs could have on the City's General Fund or other funds. The following table shows the "City and CDC" programs that are currently requested for the next fiscal year: Current Tab # Program Request 3 Nutrition Program $ 50,000 5 Graffiti (25%) $ 17,875 6 Swim Program $ 21,000 7 Tiny Tots $ 18,000 8 COPS (expansion) $ 111,292 9 Literacy Program R 58,000 TOTAL $276,167 Less Avail. Funding ($211,650) Deficit $64,517 If the City Council chooses to fund the above City programs at these levels, then there will be a $64,517 deficit. Presumably, at budget time, the difference would be made out of the City's General Fund or other source(s) would be considered. Even if the City were able to fund this $64,517 difference from other funding sources, this still does not address the fact that funding the City's programs at the above levels necessarily means that none of the other Public Service programs could be funded. Simply put, within the Public Services category of the CDBG Budget, there are simply not enough dollars to go around. City C1P & Community Projects Staff is recommending that Civic Center Drive/National City Boulevard Streetscape again be the priority project this year. This year's request is for $600,000. This amount of funding combined with existing funding from previous years will put the first phase of construction at approximately $1,700,000. In this instance, the first phase would include National City Boulevard, from 12th to 14th Street, and Civic Center Drive, from National City Boulevard to Wilson Avenue. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 2 of4 Other' CIPs recommended for funding include Fire fighting equipment, Highland Ave. Street Lights, ADA pedestrian ramps, miscellaneous storm drain and concrete improvements, Las Palmas and Kimball Parking lot rehabilitation, as well as rehabilitation of tennis and basketball courts in Las Palmas, Kimball and El Toyon Parks. The recommended community projects include the graffiti, housing inspection program, handicap accessibility for the Family Resource Center and exterior painting of the Granger Music Hall. HOME Investment Partnership Act (HOME) Recommended Budget for 2000-01 Administration $ 63,300 CDC Administration CHDO Operations $ 15,000 CHDO (i.e. Christmas in July) New Construction $179,700 New Construction/For-Sale Housing Rehabilitation $100,000 Spot Blight Removal Program Acquisition $250,000 First-time Homebuyers Rental Assistance ' 25 000 Domestic Violence TOTAL $633,000 HOME funds are restricted to providing housing assistance for families with a total household income under 80% of the County median income. HOME funds can be used for Administration, Rehabilitation, New Construction, First-time Homebuyers, and Rental Assistance. Administration (CDC) $63,300 is recommended for administration of the HOME program including general oversight, monitoring and management of the program. HUD allows 10% of the grant amount to be utilized for this purpose. Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) $15,000 is recommended as a capacity grant to the Christmas in July Program. HUD allows a maximum of 5% or $31,650 to be used for this purpose. A minimum of 15% of the HOME funds, or $94,950, must be used by a Community Housing Development Organization (CHDO) for the development of affordable housing. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 3 of 4 Rehabilitation $100,000 is recommend for the new City/CDC Spot Blight Removal Program. This program requires the CDC to match City funding for the purchase of property in accordance with the recently amended Abandoned Facilities Ordinance. Since abandoned buildings exist both inside and outside the Redevelopment Project area, it is appropriate that the City and CDC provide matching funds to purchase and cause the redevelopment of those properties that otherwise would remain a visual and economic blight on the neighborhood and City. First -Time Homehnyers Staff is recommending $250,000 be utilized for this purpose. These funds will be used in conjunction with CDC's Low to Moderate -Income Housing Fund. When homebuyers have income below 80% of County median, HOME funds can be used. Buyers with income between 80% and 120% of County median are assisted with Low/Mod funds. New Constmction Staff is recommending $179,900 be used to promote the new construction of affordable, for -sale housing. Tenant -Based Rental Assistance Staff recommends that $25,000 again be reserved to assist victims of domestic violence with their housing needs. This will be the third and last year of a three-year grant with South Bay Community Services. Explanation to May 9, 2000 A-200 Page 4 of 4 RESOLUTION 2000 — 57 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE DRAFT 2000-05 CONSOLIDATED PLAN AND DRAFT 2000-01 ANNUAL PLAN INCLUDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT (HOME) PROGRAM BUDGETS WHEREAS, the City of National City administers the allocation of CDBG and HOME funding for the Federal Government under the U.S. Depailinent of Housing and Urban Development (HUD); and WHEREAS, as a grantee of CDBG and HOME funds, the City of National City is required to prepare a Five -Year Consolidated Plan for FY 2000-05 and a One -Year Annual Plan for FY 2000-01; and WHEREAS, the City desires to allocate program funds for the 2000-01 program year; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City held a public hearing on the allocation of said funds on March 7, April 25, and May 9, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City has agreed to allocate these funds as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the CDBG and HOME funds as shown on the attached Exhibits "A" and `B" are approved, and the Mayor is hereby authorized, on behalf of the City Council, to submit the 2000-05 Consolidated Plan and 2000-01 Annual Plan for the expenditure of said funds to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). PASSED and ADOPTED this 9th day of May, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk George H. Eiser, III City Attorney 2000-01 CDBG BUDGET - PRELIMINARY 09-May-00 / ORGANIZATION public Services 1 Access Center of San Diego 2 Boys & Girls Club of NC 3 CDC 4 Legal Legal Of San Diego 5 N.C. Building & Safety Dept. 6 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 7 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 8 N.C. Police Department 9 N.C. Public Library 10 San Diego Council on Literacy 11 South Bay Community Services 12 SW Center for Asian Pac. Amer. Law 13 Sults You San Diego Total Public Services Community Projects 14 N.C. Historical Society 15 N.C. Building & Safety Department 16 N.C. Building & Safety Department 17 National City Collaborative 18 Operation Samahan, Inc. Total Community Projects ry ty CIP 19 CDC/Engineering 20 Engineering 21 Engineering 22 Engineering 23 Engineering 24 Engineering 25 Engineering 26 Engineering 27 Engineering 28 Engineering 29 Engineering 30 Engineering 31 Fire 32 Fire 33 Parks & Recreation Total City CIP Administration & Planning 34 Fair Housing Council of SD N/A CDC/City Total Administration & Planning GRAND TOTAL PROGRAM Independent Living for Seniors and the Disabled $ After -School Transportation $ N.C. Nutrition Program $ Legal Services Graffiti (25% of program) Swim Program Tiny Tots Neigh. Police (expansion) Literacy Services Family Learning Traditions NC Critical Hours Program Legal Services Employment Retention Training Granger Music Hall - Exterior paint Graffiti (75% of program) Housing Inspection Program Family Resource Center Expansion The Bridge Civic Center Dr./NC Blvd. Streetscape Installation of Pedestrian Ramps Reinstallation Of Street Lights Misc. Storm Drains Misc Concrete Improvements Alley Improvements Las Palmas/Kimball Park - Parking Lots Kimball Bowl Restrooms Paradise Creek Channel - East End Improvements to Bonita Mesa Road Drain Las Palmas Park - Street Widening Neighborhood curb, gutter, sidewalk Fire Fighting Equipment Main Fire Station Tennis Court/Basketball Court Rehab Fair Housing Program CDBG Administration $ S S S S S 5 S S $ S S S S S REOUESTED 5,000 $ 15,725 S 50,000 S 10,000 $ 17,875 $ 21,000 $ 18,000 S 111,292 $ 58,000 S 4,500 S 61,500 $ 50,000 $ 7,500 $ 430,392 $ 12,500 S 53,625 $ 31,500 $ 35,000 S 30,000 $ 162,625 $ 600,000 100,000 50,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 130,000 130,000 60,000 150,000 100,000 450,000 54,000 333,400 30,000 2,487,400 'CDC REC • $ 15,000 $ 30,000 $ • $ 12,500 $ 21,000 $ 18,000 $ 55,150 $ 40,000 $ 20,000 S S $ STAFF REC 99-00 FUNDING NOTES Pub. Services Cap NR equals $211,650 15,000 S 15,000 30,000 $ 20,000 • NR NR- No Request 12,500 $ 10,000 last Year 21,000 $ 21,000 18,000 S 18,000 NF= Not Funded 25,000 NF last Year 40,000 S 40,000 NR 50,150 $ 20,000 Expanded request NR for 2000-01 NR 21I,650 9 10,000 $ 37,500 $ 30,000 S 25,000 $ - 211,650 10,000 37,500 $ 30,000 S 25,000 S 102,500 $ $ 600,000 $ $ 50,000 S $ 50,000 S S 50,000 $ S - $ $• S S 111,850 S $ - $ $ $ $ 100,000 S $ - S $ - S $ 50,000 $ S - $ S - $ $ 1,011,850 $ $ 12,000 $ $ 75,000 $ $ 87,000 $ 10,000 75,000 85,000 $ $ $ $ 3,167,417 $ 1,411,000 $ 102,500 600,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 5 - S 130,000 51,850 $ 30,000 1,011,850 10,000 $ 75,000 S 85,000 1,411,000 Comm. Projects has NR no funding cap 56,250 30,000 50,000 NR City CIP has no 647,750 funding cap 50,000 35,000 50,000 50,000 NF NR NR NF NF NR NF 37,000 NF NR Admin & Planning 10,000 cap - $282,200 75,000 PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of San Diego: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of THE STAR NEWS, a newspaper of general circulation, published ONCE WEEKLY in the city of National City and the South Bay Judicial District, county of San Diego, which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San. Diego, State of California, under the date of April 23, 1951, Case Number 182529; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: 4/21, 4/28, all in the year 2000 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Chula Vista, California 91910 this 28th day Signatu PRINCIP CLER This space is for the County Clerk's filing stamp Proof of Publication of NC 13523 Public Hearing Notice ' P 1BLIC'!HEAHINGiNOTICE 20604t CONttil AT€U , .h<PL�tTJ'F.UNUl iC QcATION FOR .. COMMt�N'C1' ,,pE1RELBPNIEnSioctC_ ", AN1"(GQBCt` 4OMt4fiVESSTM NT :I ;PAtRTNEBsfllP ACr ; �HOIu1Ej PROGRAM e`;:C Epuncl~4i fhe� C¢y. oftuylat:City -Hill,.,, Jto[tl.=a PLIBLIOtEAR1NG.: oh �uestlagg Apnl 23' at' .001P;M.arx7hAay 2O0d0V at 3�OA pfl! •m�he §., CDagea�,-.Ckeriters,; (24"§;. 'Natio1At=Si►ritetilevard: NatioRal�ify,�alifpmras '. >:rfie`.�purp�e_ot3liepubitc iiitgsare to mvdepublic xonimdent on Mire ftousmg bid oommunity ydevelop a 004needsaof;'tpaxet an-.` f ogie i uselin'Ids.;dn la=: ,bonaTCdy'Tti@'Oi� EobnclL rxdf zs}±0k0.0resentOlippt firpn appluants mid eon y stder publiciuf Onthe FY F.2000-=05:4bns41 datQd;Plan oa tpnl 2b Thal_e2Ainoau wdj Fansjderi lco lfl t Aee_aod taff;reconimebda; Siops=on'+May 9.. for the 'C©B and HOME,P.regram Budgets .Approximately $2,4100'000 is available this.: eaE:frnin'ifti0 tor`_hotismg antl _Commtinity :develop ' ment�PF01eC4S tRiMiler information"nn the,^<aboue Cdhsohdated ;' Plan<BChvibes: coo be Ob a glued ai•.1 a mmumty; 0evelopment' onti ssion, :, -dffice 140 E 12th Stieet,`, Suite°B. NabDfll Cdy_ A;_ • st950.:at"by: Caliing;9en `Martine _-at-61.9:)_;• 6-:: Paul DeSrothers:a Executive D reetpr NC13323 -".41(2 28/10' Attachment No. 1 2000-01 HOME BUDGET ACTIVITY Administration Acquisition Rehabilitation New Construction Tenant -Based Rent CHDO Operations TOTAL HCDC STAFF REC 63,300 250,000 100,000 179,700 25,000 15,000 REC EXPLANATION $ 63,300 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 179,700 $ 25,000 $ 15,000 633,000 $ 633,000 CDC Administration (10% max) First-time homebuyers Spot Blight Removal Program New construction/For Sale Housing Housing for Domestic Violence Christmas In July Operations Request Attachment No. 2000-01 C9HG 317DGET - HRELIb1Ii2L&Y 9•May00 A 0RCAN1ZAT10N PabLcSerafars I Access Center of San Diego 2 Boys & Girls Club of NC 3 CDC 4 Legd Legal of San Diego 5 N.C.BuiIding & Safety Dept. 6 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 7 N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. 8 N.C. Police Department 9 N.C.P ublic Ubrary 10 San Diego Council an Literacy 11 South Bay Community Services 12 SW Center for Asian Pac. Amer. Law 13 Suit; You San Diego Trim' Pre611i S_w ires Courses-HyPmLrafs 14 N.C. Historical Society 15 N.0 Building & Safety Department 16 N.0 Building & Safety Department 17 Natbnal City Collaborative 18 0peatian Samahan, Inc. Tad Carmmudty Projects rr-r CIP L9 CDC/Engineering 20 Engneering 21 Engneering 22 Engneering 23 Engneering 24 Engneering 25 Engneering 26 Engrreering 27 Engneering 28 Engneering 29 Engneering 30 Engneering 31 Fire 32 Fire 33 Parks & Recreation Tea City QP Adrrirustrntian & PLarmtag 34 Fair Housing Council of SD N/A CDC/City Tatr1Adanin siratian &Planning G2E3D 70121 PROGRAM Independent Living for snior_and the Disabled After•School Tnanspartzion N.C. Nutrition Program Legal Services Graffiti (25% of pragrar) Swim Program Tiny Tots Neigh. Police (ex pansi a) Literacy Services Family LeamingTraditvrs NC Cntical Hours Prog.m Legal Services Employment Retention rainirg Granger Music Hall - E.rlorpaint Graffiti (75% of prograi) Housing Inspection Pngram Family Resource CerrteExparsion The Bridge Civic Center Dr./NC 81d. Stnetscape Installation of Pedestrbr Reaps Re -installation of StreetLight. Misc. Storm Drains Misc Concrete Improvenents Alley Improvements Las Palmas/Kimball Prk - Patting Lots Kimball Bawl Restroonr Paradise Creek Charon - Ear. End Improvements to Boni:, Mes; Road Drain Las Palmas Park - Streit 4Vidsning Neighborhood curb, gater, sidewalk Fire Fighting Equipmet Main Fire Station Tennis Caurt/Basketbil Court Rehab Fair Housing Program C08G Administration REOUESTED $ 5,000 $ 15,725 $ 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 17,875 $ 21,000 $ 18,000 $ 111,292 $ 58,000 $ 4,500 $ 61,500 $ 50,000 S 7,500 $ 430,332 $ S $ 12,500 53,625 31,500 35,000 30,000 HCDC REC • L5,000 30,000 12,500 21.000 18,000 55,150 40,000 20,000 STAFT REC 15,000 30,000 12,500 21,000 18,000 25,C00 40,000 50,150 $ 212, 550 $ $ 10,000 $ $ 37,5C0 $ $ 30,000 $ $ 25.000 $ S - S 162,62s $ $ 600,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 50,000 $ 100.000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 130,000 $ $ 130,000 $ $ 60,000 $ $ 150,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 450,000 $ $ 54,000 $ $ 333,400 $ S 30,000 S $ 2,487,400 $ S S 12,000 75,00D 87,000 $ 3,147,427 211,650 10,000 37,500 30,000 25,000 202,500 $ 600,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 111,850 100,000 $ . $ . $ 50,000 $ - S S 102,500 600,000 100,000 50.000 50,000 130,000 51,850 30,000 2,011,850 $ $ 7.0,000 $ 75,000 $ 85,000 $ 1,411, 000 1, 021, 850 S 10,000 S 75,000 S &50 0 $ 1,415.000 2000-01 HOME BUDGET ACTIVITY Administration Acquisition Rehabilitation New Construction Tenant -Based Rent CHDO Operations TOTAL HCDC REC $ 63,300 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 179,700 $ 25,000 $ 15,000 $ 633,000 STAFF REC $ 63,300 $ 250,000 $ 100,000 $ 179,700 $ 25,000 $ 15,000 $ 633,000 EXPLANATION CDC Administration (10% max) First-time homebuyers Spot Blight Removal Program New construction/For Sale Housing Housing for Domestic Violence Christmas In July Operations Request Exhibit "B' CDBG STATUS REPORT 1996-97 TO 1999-00 DEPT./ORGANIZATION 1996-97 Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Library Police Police Citizens Patrol Police Building & Safety Building & Safety CDC Engineering Fire Parks and Recreation Boys & Girls Club Public Works Engineering Engineering Engineering Fair Housing Council of SD TOTAL 1996-97 DEPT./ORGANIZATION 1997-98 Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Library National School District South Bay Comm. Services Police Building & Safety Building & Safety Building & Safety Fire Fire Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Engineering Boys and Girls Club CDC SUHSD Operation Samahan Public Works Public Woks Public Works Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering P&R/CDC TOTAL 1997-98 PROGRAM/PROJECT Tiny Tots Learn to Swim Literacy Program Youth Diversion Juvenile Offender Community Patrols COPS Program Graffiti Program Housing Inspections Mile of Cars Streetscape Traffic Signal/24th & Wilson Fire Truck Dusk to Dawn Lights Improvements to facility Las Palmas Pool Deck ADA Pedestrian Ramps Sidewalks, Curbs, Gutters Scoreshacks Fair Housing Program PROGRAM/PROJECT Tiny Tots Learn to Swim Literacy Program 6th Grade Camp Rent Deposit/Security COPS Program Housing Inspections Graffiti Program Library Re -roof Fire Truck Fire Equipment Baseball Field Renovation Dusk to Dawn Lights Scoreshacks Site improvements Civic Center Drive - design Batting Cages Clinic Expansion - design El Toyon Scoreboard Kimball Bowl Rehab Las Palmas Chlorination System ADA Pedestrian Ramps Misc. Concrete Improvements 50/50 Improvements Misc. Storm Drains Wilson Ave. Drainage Casa de Salud Expansion BUDGETED $ 18,000 $ $ 24,000 $ $ 40,000 $ $ 34,488 $ $ 19,160 $ $ 2,500 $ $ 28,744 $ $ 101,300 $ $ 29,500 $ $ 500,000 $ $ 125,000 $ $ 107,300 $ $ 25,000 $ $ 20,000 $ $ 60,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 45,000 $ $ 9.500 $ $ 1,389,492 $ BUDGETED $ 18,000 $ $ 21,000 $ $ 40,000 $ $ 3,000 $ $ 5,000 $ $ 122,750 $ $ 29,600 $ $ 75,500 $ $ 90,000 $ $ 170,300 $ $ 30,000 $ $ 45,000 $ $ 10,000 $ $ 45,000 $ $ 20,000 $ $ 35,000 $ $ 3,000 $ $ 19,850 $ $ 12,000 $ $ 255,000 $ $ 20,000 $ $ 75,000 $ $ 50,000 $ $ 25,000 $ $ 25,000 $ $ 100,000 $ $ 150,000 $ $ 1,495,000 $ BALANCE • 9,824 9,824 BALANCE STATUS Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Project completed Project completed 2 of 3 lease payments Project on -going Project completed Project cancelled Project completed Project completed Project completed Program completed STATUS Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed 1,220 Program on -going Program completed Program completed Program on -going Project completed 3 of 3 lease payments Project completed 45,000 Project under construction 10,000 Project ongoing Project completed Project completed Project completed Project completed 4,653 Project completed Project completed 230,351 Project under design Project completed Project completed Project completed 25,000 Project on -going Project completed Project completed Project cancelled 316,224 DEPT./ORGANIZA' PROGRAM/PROJECT BUDGETED BALANCE STATUS 1998-99 Parks and Recreation Parks and Recreation Library Police Fair Housing Council of SD NC Critical Hours Collaborative Boys & Girls Club of NC Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department CDC CDC/Parks & Recreation CDC CDC N.C. Living History Farm Preserve N.C. Collaborative operation Samahan, Inc. Engineering Engineering Engineering Engineering Fire Parks & Recreation Public Works Public Works Public Works TOTAL 1998-99 DEPT./ORGANIZATION 1999-00 Fair Housing Council of SD Boys & Girls Club of NC Comm. Dev. Commission Community Food Bank of NC InterAmerican College South Bay Community Services N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. N.C. Parks & Recreation Dept. N.C. Public Library Accion San Diego Bldg. & Safety Department Bldg. & Safety Department National City Collaborative USIAA Engineering Engineering Engineering Fire Public Works Public Works CDC Fire Total 1999-00 Tiny Tots Learn to Swim Literacy Program COPS Program Fair Housing Program Critical Hours Program After School Transportation Graffiti Program Graffiti Truck Literacy Program - Relocation Housing Inspection Program "Q" Ave. • Capital Contingency Casa de Salud Park Expansion Nutrition Program Higher Education Facility Re -roofing of Stein Farm Family Resource Center Clinic Building Expansion Pedestrian Ramps Misc. Concrete Improvements Misc. Storm Drains Street Lights - Highland (Div. To 8th) Fire Equipment El Toyon Park Rehab Re -roof Kimball Senior Center Las Palmas Pool Plumbing Rehab. Reconstruct Las Palmas Score Shacks PROGRAM/PROJECT $ 18,000 $ 21,000 $ 40,000 $ 56,525 $ 10,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 75,500 $ 90,000 $ 6,520 $ 33,000 $ 220,775 $ 200,000 $ 25,000 $ 50,000 $ 6,200 $ 50,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 40,000 $ 30,000 $ 75,000 $ 20,000 $ 10,000 $ 1,457,520 Fair Housing Program $ After -School Transportation $ N.C. Nutrition Program $ Program Coordinator $ Serving National City $ NC Critical Hours Program $ Swim Program $ Tiny Tots $ Literacy Services $ Accion San Diego $ Graffiti $ Housing Inspection Program $ Family Resource Center Expansion $ Archie Moore Ed. & Training Complex $ Ped. Ramps/Misc. Concrete Improvements $ Misc. Storm Drains $ Re -installation of Street Lights $ Firefighting Equipment $ Fire Station #15 - Emerg. Generator $ Las Palmas Park Well Rehab $ Civic Center Dr./NC Blvd. Streetscape $ New Fire Station $ BUDGETED • 21,043 87,036 • • 100,000 28,530 • • 7,680 9,499 • 73,060 10,859 $ 337,707 BALANCE ' 10,000 $ 4,903 15,000 $ 20,000 $ 15,000 $ 11,486 20,000 $ 13,036 20,000 $ 6,703 21,000 $ 18,000 $ 40,000 $ 9,976 10,000 $ 66,250 $ 26,181 30,000 $ 19,140 50,000 $ 50,000 20,000 $ 20,000 100,000 $ 83,117 50,000 $ 50,000 35,000 $ 35,000 37,000 $ 25,801 25,000 $ 25,000 30,000 $ 30,000 1,163,320 $ 1,097,068 50,000 $ 35.625 $ 1,845,570 $ 1,543,036 Program completed Program completed Program on -going Program completed Program completed Program completed Program completed Program on -going Truck to be delivered Proect completed Program completed Project completed Project cancelled Program on -going Project completed Project completed Project completed Fundraising Project completed Project completed Project completed Project completed Project on -going Project completed with other fu Project under design Project completed Project cancelled STATUS Project on -going Project on -going Project on -going Program on -going Project underway Program on -going Program ongoing Program on•going Program ongoing Project completed Program ongoing Project on -going Project underway Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design Project under design MEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 9, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 (-ITEM TITLE USE OF THE COMMUNITY BUILDING BY THE NATIONAL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR SALUTE TO THE NAVY LUNCHEON ON OCTOBER 11, 2000 AND WAIVER OF FEES PREPARED BY Burton Myers DEPARTMENT Public Works EXPLANATION The Chamber of Commerce is requesting the use of the Community Building (North Room) on October 11, 2000 from 9:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. for the Salute to the Navy Luncheon. Waiver of fees is requested. Fees: Building (North Room) $439.85 Kitchen 60.00 Custodial 100.53 $600.38 (-Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Loss of $600.38 to the General >STAFF RECOMMENDATIO Authorize use and waive fe F� • Pfl requ-s if waiver ees is approved. Account No. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. [\Plication for use of the Community Building A-200 (9/80) APPLICATION FOR USE OF THE NATIONAL CITY TO ALL APPLICANTS: It is strongly recommended that the applicant requesting use of the facility attend the City Council meeting, when the item is going to be discussed in order to answer any questions posed by the City Council. Please refer to the attached copy of "Rules and Regulations." Name of Organization Business Address Name of Applicant Address National City Chamber of Commerce 711 "A" Avenue - National City, CA 91950-2228 Edith Hughes, Chief Executive Officer 711 "A" Avenue - National City, CA 91950-2228 Telephone Number( 619) 477-9339 (day) (619 ) 475-6124 (evening) Type of Function Salute to Navy Week Luncheon Date Requested Wednesday, October 11, 2000 Decorating Time 9 : 00 A . M . (am/pm) to 11 : 00 A . M . (am/pm) Function Time 11 : 00 A.M. (am/pm) to 2 : 00 P.M. (=pm) cn Use of Kitchen Facility X yes no Use Time 9 : 00 A A. M .(am/pm) to 3 : 00 P . M . Clean-up i 2 : 00 P . M .(am/pm) to 3 : 00 P.M. Number of Participants 200 Will Admission be charged? For Lunch If yes, Amount $ 15 .00 Will this event be used as a fund raising event? NO Will alcohol be served? NO ABC Permit Submitted? N/A Certificate of Insurance attached? YES Special configuration of tables or chairs required? (If yes, attach sketch) Special equipment required? YES (If yes, attached list) Copy of Rules & Regulations provided? YES Initial I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THE RULES & REGULATIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER, AND I AGREE FOR MY ORGANIZATION TO CONFORM TO ALL OF ITS PROVISIONS. %.1 P.A. - Stage - Flag Applicant recognizes and understands that use of the City's facility may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation and that Applicant may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. Applicant further agrees to pay any and all property taxes, if any assessed during the use of the City's facility pursuant to Sections 107 and 107.6 of the Revenue and Taxation Code against Applicant's possessory interest in the City's facility. Y qoo Signature i nature ofpp A li nt Date CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of Insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization National City Chamber of Commerce Person is charge of activity Edith Hughes or Jeff Phipps Address 711 "A" Avenue - National CitTelephone (619) 477-9339 City facilities and/or property requested Community Center - 140 East 12th St. Date(s)of use Wednesday, October 11, 2000 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned hereby agree(s) to hold the City of National City harmless and indemnify the City of National City from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation and liability arising out of or related to the use of public property by permittee's agents, employees or contractors. Cheif Executive Officer Official Title Dade DO Certificate of Insurance Approved by Name & Title Rev. 1 /21 /00 2 ACORD, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE CSR RMDATE(MM/DD/YY) NCCHAMl 09/21/99 PROOUCEP Wateridge Insurance Services 10525 Vista Sorrento Pkwy #300 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. ;an Diego CA 92121 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Ronald B. Guy Phone No. 858-452-2200 Fax No.858-452-6004 COMPANY Golden Eagle Ins. Corp. INSURED COMPANY B National City Chamber of Commerce COMPANY C 711 A Ave. National City CA 91950 COMPANY D COVERAGES THIS Is TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE(MM/DDIYY) POUCY EXPIRATION DATE(MM/DD/YY) LIMITS A GENERAL LIABILITY X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CCP51839301 09/22/99 09/22/00 GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000. PRODUCTS -COMPIOPAGG $ INCLUDED I I CLAIMS MADE ( X I OCCUR PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1 r 000 , 000 . OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000 , 000. FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 100 , 000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 5,000. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT $ BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE $ GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO $ AUTO ONLY- EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY EACH ACCIDENT $ AGGREGATE _ I $ EXCESS LIABILITY UMBRELLA FORM OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $ $ WORKERS COMPENSATION EMPLOYERS LIABILITY THE PROPRIETOR/ PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE: AND INCL EXCL ORYTUMNITS OER EL EACH ACCIDENT $ EL DISEASE- POLICY LIMIT $ EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS *10 Days Notice of Cancellation for Nonpayment of Premium. Certificateholder is included as Additional Insured per Endorsement Attached. CERT)FICATE HOLDER CITY059 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 * DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, City of National City 1243 National City Blvd BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY —ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. National City CA 91950 ACORD 25-S (1/95) AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ) / -^, ( e- /�: .. Ronald B. Guyiy m '"•`. -.� (r " �' ACORD CORPORATILON 1988