HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 06-13 CC AGENDA PKTAGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING
NATIONAL CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD
REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY, JUNE 13, 2000 - 6:00 P.M.
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC
PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO
THE C►TY CLERK
IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR
CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL
GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF
NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY
MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO
CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO
KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT.
ROLL CALL
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY THE CITY MANAGER, TOM G.
MCCABE
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 6, 2000
COUNCIL AGENDA
6/13/00 Page 2
MAYOR'S PRESENTATION
Local Fiscal Financial Reform presented by Ken Fabricatore (SANDAG)
PROCLAMATION
Proclaiming June 24, 2000 to be: "MILE OF CARS BLOOD DRIVE DAY"
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine
or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a
single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed
from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a
Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public.
1. WARRANT REGISTER #49 (Finance)
Ratification of Demands in the amount of $1,842,500.00
ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
2. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending Title 10
of the National City Municipal Code by adding Chapter 10.21 and Sections
10.21.010 through 10.21.070, all pertaining to restricting possession of
Clonazepam. (City Attorney)
NEW BUSINESS
3. Temporary Use Permit - New Covenant Tabernacle Community Outreach.
(Building & Safety)
COUNCIL AGENDA
6/13/00 Page 3
NEW BUSINESS (Cont.)
--* CITY MANAGER
--> CITY ATTORNEY
-> OTHER STAFF
4. Approval of Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for car show at Sweetwater High
School on June 5, 2000. (City Clerk)
- � MAYOR
- ÷ CITY COUNCIL
5. Discussion of quarterly meetings for claims/litigation review. (Councilman
Inzunza)
PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit)
NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back
on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or
urgent nature.
COUNCIL AGENDA
6/13/00 Page 4
NEW BUSINESS (Cont.)
ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular City Council Meeting - June 20, 2000 at 3:00 p.m. - Council
Chambers, Civic Center.
TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO
IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
Office of the Mayor
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526
George H. Waters - Mayor
DATE: JUNE 1, 2000
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: MAYOR WATERS
SUBJECT: COUNCIL AGENDA --- JUNE 13, 2000
Please include under the Mayor's Presentation: LOCAL FISCAL FINANCIAL
REFORM presented by Ken Fabricatore (SANDAG).
GEO
MAYOR
GE H. WATERS
0
Recycled Paper
1rti rtaluatiLln
WHEREAS, The San Diego Blood Bank, a non-profit organization, is the primary
blood supplier to the San Diego region; and
WHEREAS, The San Diego Blood Bank was established in 1950 by the San Diego
County Medical Society with the specific purpose of serving this
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
WHEREAS,
community; and
The San Diego Blood Bank is awarding special blood donor T-shirts
to all blood donors throughout the month of June, 2000, to recognize
those who give blood; and
The San Diego Blood Bank needs 400 pints of blood per day to
maintain an adequate supply for our region; and
The National City Mile of Cars is holding their first annual Blood
Drive Day to benefit the San Diego Blood Bank in the City of National
City on Saturday, June 24, 2000.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE H. WATERS, Mayor of the City of
Wational City, do hereby proclaim June 24, 2000 to be:
"MILE OF CARS BLOOD DRIVE DAY"
in the City of National City and salute the Mile of Cars in its efforts to
encourage San Diegans to give blood. I also urge all civic and service
organizations and businesses, if they have not already done so, to form
blood donor groups to provide blood for others.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the
City of National City to be affixed this 13th day of June, 2000.
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
1
MEETING DATE 06/13/00 AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #49
PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE
EXPLANATION -Ratification of Warrant Register #49
per Government Section Code 37208.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No.
TAFF RECOMMENDATION
I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $1,842,500.00
BOARD/COMMISSIO RECOMMEND TION
ITT; :CHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. Warrant Register #49
2. Payroll dated 6/7/00
3. Workers' Comp Warrant Register dated 5/31/00
Resolution No
A•200 (Rev. 9/80)
SECOND READING
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE June 13, 2000
2
AGENDA ITEM NO.
(-ITEM TITLE
ORDINANCE AMENDING 1'1'1'LE 10 OF THE NCMC BY ADDING CHAPTER 10.21 AND
SECTIONS 10.21.010 THROUGH 10.21.070, ALL PERTAINING TO RESTRICTING POSSESSION OF
CLONAZEPAM
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
Rudolf Hradecky, Esq. Vd City Attorney
EXPLANATION
Please see attached Staff Report,
Environmental Review
Financial Statement
N/A
X N/A
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Enact ordinance.
BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS 1 Listed Below }
Ordinance
Background material from the City of San Diego governing an ordinance to prohibit possession of
Cionazepam without a presc:. iption.
Resolution No.
A-200 (9/80)
STAFF REPORT
ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY
ADDING CHAPTER 10.21 AND SECTIONS 10.21.010 THROUGH 10.21.070, ALL
PERTAINING TO RESTRICTING POSSESSION OF CLONAZEPAM
In 1984, the Legislature amended provisions of the Health and Safety Code, inadvertently
making mere possession of Clonazepam not unlawful. Legislation has been introduced (AB 163,
Wayne) to ieiuedy this. However, it is unlikely to be enacted prior to January 1, 2001.
Clonazepam is readily and cheaply available in Mexico without a prescription. Clonazepam is
within the category of drugs called "date rape" drugs which have been used to facilitate sexual
attacks upon unsuspecting victims who unknowingly ingest the drug. The District Attorney
cannot prosecute persons for simple possession of Clonazepam, such as for a few capsules,
unless the quantity is large enough to be classified as possession for sale. Due to our proximity
to the border and the number of incidents reported in the South Bay district, both the Chief of
Police and the Supervising Deputy District Attorney, South Bay, concur that enactment of a local
ordinance making simple possession without a prescription a misdemeanor will allow police to
apprehend and, when necessary, impound Clonazepam from offenders, thereby restricting the
availability of this substance and potentially reducing its threat. The District Attomey's Office
has advised that it will prosecute any violators if this ordinance is enacted. The attached
ordinance is patterned on an urgency ordinance ;enacted by the City of San Diego. Other cities
are considering enacting comparable ordinances in order to coordinate law enforcement efforts.
The proposed ordinance contains a "sunset" provision, i.e., it will be automatically repealed and
decodified upon the effective date of any state law regulating or prohibiting the possession of
Clonazepam without a prescription.
Clans F. Boyorrnre
Jeffrey.. Deland
Chief CaDaaas
James L Ashford
David Dkaemon
Mn T. Studebaker
.aria A.weItmen
Devtd D. Aiws
Flan.. S. Durbin
RobertR Granke
Micheal a Keay
Mkhaal J. Kamen
James A. Marsha
Robert G. M6usr
Thdyo.Peve611
Marguerhe Roth
Wham X. Stant
Micheal H. Upson
Christopher Zfride
Prindpei Depvin
Stele Capitol. Suite 3021
6eaamenio. CA s611144908
(916) 445.30S7
Teledopter. (316) 322-076e
Honorable Howard W
2170 State Capi
Dear Mr. W
state law?
state law.
Connstl
of fortha
BION M. GREGORY
Sacramento, California
November 22, 1999
QUESTION
Is the simple possession of clonazepam prohibited by
Paul AMU
Chores C. Aebat
.toe J. Ayala.
Lars K. Bierman
Merle L 8ondemo
Ann M. Bumtae
Eileen J. Swoon
Cindy M. Cerdullo
Shard Had Cohen
Endts Cutrsr
Ben E. Date
Syron O. Garnish. Jr.
J. Christopher Damon
Cordon J. dawn
Linda Dozier
cherish S. Minn
Sharon R. Rehm
Clay Ruler
PsMN. R. Gage
Debit Mich Gibbons
Sins K Gilbent
boys Anne Went
Min D.Gnas
Esuabe%M. Gran
Made MleMoe Hanle
Janet HarMgton
SeMw S. Hen
Thane R. Heuer
•
Led Mn Joseph
David B. Judson
Micheal Anon Ken
Era B.14odnger
Aubrey t L. gee
Fetid' i
Diana G. Lim
Kat S. Lade
Mariana Marin
Anthony P./as/qua
Francisco A. Martin
JudyAnne McGinley
Peter Waco,
Abel MA:
Dams L Nevlk
Wined L Pope, Jr.
Sharon Reilly
Tara Ruro
Michael B. Salemo
Jessica L Steele
Christopher H. Stevens
Ellin Swint
. Mack Franklin Terry
Jab Thorn
Richard S. Weisberg
Karen L Zl,Mnd
Jack C. Zorman
OPINION
The simple possession of clonazepam is not prohibited by
ANALYSIS
By way of background, the terms "simple possession" and
"possession for sale" are discussed in Witkin and Epstein,
California Criminal Law, 2nd Edition, Section 1001, as follows:
"(a) Simple Possession [involves) the
following elements: (1) A specified controlled
substance, in a sufficient quantity. (2)
Possession, which may be physical or constructive,
and exclusive or joint. (3) Knowledge of the fact
of possession and of the illegal character of the
substance."
"Any person may be guilty of illegal
possession, including doctors and pharmacists who
acquire the substance otherwise than in compliance
with the regulations governing lawful use.
Honorable Howard Wayne - p. 2 - #24307
"(b) Possession for Sale ... necessarily
requires] proof of the purpose of possession. . .
* * *II
(Citations omitted.)
Controlled substances are regulated under the Uniform
Controlled Substances Act set forth in Division 10 (commencing
with Section 11000) of the Health and Safety Code. Under that
law, controlled substances are classified into five schedules,
with Schedule I set forth in Section 11054 of the Health and
Safety Code, Schedule II set forth in Section 11055 of the Health
and Safety Code, Schedule. III set forth in Section 11056 of the
Health .and Safety Code, Schedule IV set forth in Section 11057
of the Health and Safety Code, and Schedule V set forth in
Section 11058 of the Health and Safety Code. The term "controlled
substance," unless otherwise specified, means a drug, substance,
or immediate precursor that is Listed in any schedule in
Section 11054, 11055, 11056, 11057, or 11058 of the Health and
Safety Code (Sec. 11007, H.& S.C.).
Section 11057 of the Health and Safety Code reads, in
pertinent part, as follows:
"11057. (a) The controlled substances listed
in this section are included in Schedule IV.
* * *
"(c) Narcotic drugs. Unless specifically
excepted or unless listed in another schedule, any
material, compound, mixture, or preparation
containing any of the following narcotic drugs, or
their salts calculated as the free anhydrous base.
or alkaloid, in limited quantities as set forth
below:
"(1) Not more than 1 milligram of difenoxin
and not less than 25 micrograms of atropine sulfate
per dosage unit.
"(2) Dextropropoxyphene (alpha-(+)-4-
dimethylamino-1, 2-diphenyl-3-methy1-2-
propionoxybutane). .
"(d) Depressants. Unless specifically excepted
or unless listed in another schedule, any material,
compound, mixture, or preparation which contains
any quantity of the following substances, including
its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers whenever
the existence of those salts,.isomers, and salts of
7
Honorable Howard Wayne - p. 3 - #24307
isomers is possible within the specific chemical
designation:
* * *
"(6) Clonazepam.
Thus, the controlled substance clonazepam is listed in
Schedule IV (para. (6),. subd. (d), Sec. 11057, H.& S.C.). It is
classified under that schedule as a depressant and not as a
narcotic.drug (compare subds. (c) and (d), Sec. 11057, H.& S.C.).
Under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, Chapter 6
(commencing with Section. 11350) sets forth offenses and penalties
involving controlled substances. Article S (commencing with
Section 11377) of that chapter pertains to offenses involving
specified controlled substances, including nonnarcotic Schedule IV
drugs. Section 11377 of the Health and Safety Code reads, in
pertinent part, as follows:
"11377. (a) ... every person who possesses any
controlled substance which is (1) classified in
Schedule III, IV, or V, and which is not a narcotic
drug, unless upon the prescription of a
physician, dentist, podiatrist, or veterinarian,
licensed to practice in this state, shall be
punished by imprisonment in a county jail for a
period of not more than one year or in the state
prison.
* * *"
Thus, it is a•misdemeanor or a felony for any. person to
possess any controlled substance that is classified in Schedule IV
and is not a narcotic drug, unless upon the prescription of a
physician, dentist, podiatrist, or veterinarian, licensed to
practice in this state (subd. (a), Sec. 11377, H.& S.C.).
An exception to the general rule of Section 11377 of the
Health and Safety Code is contained in Section 11375 of the Health
and Safety Code,"which reads as follows:
"11375. (a) As to the substances specified in
subdivision (c), this section, and not Sections
11377, 11378, 11379, and 11380, shall apply.
"(b) Every person who possesses for sale, or
who sells, any substance specified in subdivision
(c) shall be punished by imprisonment in the county
Honorable Howard Wayne - p. 4 - #24307
jail for a period of not more than one year or
state prison.
"(c) This section shall apply to any material,
compound, mixture, or preparation containing any of
the following substances:
"(1) Chlordiazepoxide.
."(2) Clonazepam.
* * *" (Emphasis added.)
Thus, Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code
provides that, as to the substances specified in subdivision (c),
Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code, and not
Sections 11377, 11378, 11379, and 11380 of the Health and Safety
Code,1 shall apply.
Clonazepam is one of the substances specified in
subdivision (c) of Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code
(see para. (2), subd. (c), Sec. 11375, H.& S.C.). As a result,
Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code, and not
Section 11377, 11378, 11379, or 11380 of the Health and Safety
Code, applies to any controlled substance offense involving
clonazepam. In particular, with respect to a simple possession
offense involving clonazepam, Section 11375 of the Health and
Safety Code applies rather than Section 11377 of the Health and
Safety Code.
Section 11375 makes it a misdemeanor or a felony for any
person to possess for sale, or sell, any of the substances
specified in subdivision (c). Section 11375 does not make simple
possession a criminal offense.
Thus, while Section 11377 of the Health and Safety Code
generally makes simple possession of nonnarcotic Schedule IV drugs
a crime, Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code makes an
exception to this general rule for specified nonnarcotic
Schedule IV drugs, including clonazepam. Further, while
1 Section 11378 of the Health and Safety Code proscribes the
possession for sale of specified controlled substances, including
nonnarcotic Schedule IV drugs; Section 11379 of the Health and
Safety Code proscribes the transporting, importing into this
state, selling, furnishing, administering, or giving away of the
same specified controlled substances; and Section 11380 of the
Health and Safety Code proscribes the use or inducement of a minor
by an adult to commit controlled substance offenses involving the
same specified controlled substances.
Honorable Howard Wayne - D. 5 - #24307
Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code proscribes the
possession for sale or sale of clonazepam, it does not proscribe
the simple possession of clonazepam.
To summarize, the possession of many controlled
substances is specifically made a crime by the Uniform Controlled.
Substances Act. Furthermore, the sale or possession for sale of
clonazepam is made.a crime by that act. However, the simple
possession of clonazepam is not a crime under the Uniform
•
Controlled Substances Act.
You have asked -us to consider Section 4060 of the
Business and Professions Code. That section, which is part of an
article regarding the permissible scope of practice of a
pharmacist/pharmacy subject to, and exemptions tothe application
of, the Pharmacy Act, is. contained in Article 3 (commencing with.
Section 4050) of Chapter 9 of Division 2 of the Business and .
Professions Code. The section reads, in pertinent part, as
follows:
"4060. No person shall possess any
controlled substance, except that furnished to
a person upon the prescription of a physician,
dentist, podiatrist, or veterinarian. This
section shall not apply to the possession of
any controlled substance by a manufacturer,
wholesaler, pharmacy, physician, podiatrist,
dentist, or veterinarian, when in stock in
containers correctly labeled with the name and
address of the supplier or producer."
While it may be argued that Section 4060 of the Business
and Professions Code would apply to make the simple possession of
clonazepam a crime, we think that the legislative history of
Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code and Section 4060 of
the Business and Professions Code and the applicable rules of
statutory construction present a potent counter to that. argument.
Chapter 1635 of the Statutes of 1984 (hereafter "Chapter
1635") amended Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code to
exempt clonazepam from the application of Sections 11377, 11378,
11379, and 11380 of the Health and Safety Code. That statute also
amended Section 4230 of the Business and Professions Code (the
predecessor to Section 4060 of the Business and Professions Code)
to read essentially the same as the current version of Section
4060 of the Business and Professions Code.
The rules of statutory construction provide that a
statute is to be construed so as to harmonize its various parts
within the legislative purpose of the statute as a whole (Wells v.
Marina City Properties, Inc. (1981) 29 Ca1.3d 781, 788), and if
Honorable Howard Wayne - p. 6 - #24307
possible, with other laws relating to the same subject (Isobe v.
Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1974) 12 Ca1.3d 584, 590-591).
An analysis of A.B. 3876, as amended April 5, 1984,
(which, when enacted, became Chapter 1635), by the Assembly
Committee on Criminal Law and Public Safety states that one of the
purposes of A.B. 3876 was to "[a]dd 20 new controlled substances
(see attached chart) with penalties for possession, possession for
sale, and sale, that are currently regulated by federal law but
are not covered by state schedules, to the revised state schedules
The chart that is attached to this analysis sets forth
these 20 new controlled substances and their penalties. Item 16
sets forth a group of sedative, hypnotic, or depressant controlled
substances that includes clonazepam2 and indicates that those
controlled substances are placed in Schedule IV under federal law
(21 C.F.R. 1308.14(c)), and indicates that those controlled
substances would be placed in Schedule IV under state law with the
enactment of A.B. 3876 (see Sec. 11057, H.& S.C.), with offense
penalties of incarceration in county jail or state prison for
possession for sale or sale and no penalty for simple possession.
We think that while the Uniform Controlled Substances
Act generally prohibits the possession, possession for sale, and
sale of Schedule IV nonnarcotic drugs, it is the purpose of
Section 4230 of the Business and Professions Code to provide an
exception to this general rule by authorizing the possession of
these drugs upon the prescription of a physician, dentist,
podiatrist, or veterinarian (see also Sec. 11377, H.& S.C.).
Thus, in our view, Section 4230 of the Business and Professions
Code is not intended as a separate, additional prohibition upon
the possession of controlled substances. To the extent that there
is any conflict between the Uniform Controlled Substances Act and
Section 4230, we think that the penalty provisions of the Uniform
Controlled Substances. Act constitute special statutes that prevail
over the general statute of Section 4230 of the Business and
Professions Code (see People v. Kessler (1967) 250 Cal.App.2d 642,
650) .
Section 11375 of the Health and Safety Code provides a
further exception to the general rule that prohibits the
possession of controlled substances by prohibiting only the
possession for sale or sale of specified controlled substances,
2 Item 16 sets forth diazepam, chlordiazepoxide, and
flurazepam as illustrative of the group of controlled substances
in question. These three controlled substances, as well as
clonazepam, are listed together in subdivision (c) of Section
1308.14 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which sets
forth the drugs and other substances classified in.Schedule IV of
the federal uniform controlled substances act.
Honorable Howard Wayne - p. 7 - #24307
including clonazepam. The mere possession of the controlled
substances specified in Section 11375 of the Health and Safety
Code, without a prescription, is not prohibited by state law.
Accordingly, it is our opinion that the simple
possession of clonazepam is not prohibited by state law.
Very truly yours,
SRF:sjm
Bion M. Gregory
Legislative Counsel
j
By � tl 141; c wt )L 5-1k, c_
Sharon R. Fisher
Deputy Legislative Counsel
TOTAL P.08
AB 163
Page 1
Date of Hearing: January 4, 2000
Counsel: Gregory Pagan
- ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SAFETY
Mike Honda, Chair
AB 163 (Wayne) — As Amended: January 3, 2000
SUMMARY: Makes the possession of clonazepam a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment
in the county jail for a period of not more than one year. Specifically, this bill provides that
every person who possesses clonazepam, unless upon the prescription of a physician, dentist,
podiatrist, or veterinarian licensed to practice law in California, shall be punished by
imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than one year in the county jail.
EXISTING LAW:
1) Provides that every person who possesses for sale or who sells clonazepam shall be punished
by imprisonment in the county jail for a period of not more than one year, or by
imprisonment in the state prison for 16 months, 2 or 3 years. (Health and Safety Code
Section 11375.)
2) Provides that clonazepam is a Schedule IV controlled substance. (Health and Safety Code
Section 11057.)
3) Classifies controlled substances in five schedules according to their danger and potential for
abuse. Schedule I substances are the most restricted, and Schedule V the least restricted.
(Health and Safety Code Sections 11054 —11058.)
FISCAL EFFECT: Unknown
COMMENTS:
1) Author's Statement. According to the author, "Current law does not prohibit the simple
possession of clonazepam. Clonazepam is an extremely strong prescription medication used
for the treatment of anxiety. Unfortunately, clonazepam is being used as a recreational drug
by some juveniles and adults. The pills can be easily obtained in Mexico, without a
prescription, and brought into the. United States. The drug produces serious motor
impairment, disorientation, sleep that cannot be aroused, amnesia,and if ingested in very
high doses it could lead to coma and respiratory failure. Effects begin in about 15 to 20
minutes depending on the mode of ingestion and can last up to 12 hours. Clonazepam can
commonly be found in high schools, on college campuses and at parties. It is used to
facilitate rape and other assaults. Sometimes, it is administered to unknowing victims by
putting it in their drink.
"Clonazepam pills are sold for as little as a dollar, and are called the 'dollar a date' drug by
many who use it. AB 163 will make it a misdemeanor to possess clonazepam without a
prescription. I believe we must do everything in our power to stop the proliferation of 'date
AB 163
Page 2
rape drugs'."
2) Background. Clonazepam is a Schedule IV controlled substance. It is an anticonvulsant with
pharmacologicalprofile similar to other anxiolytic/sedative benzodiazepines. Clonazepam is •
capable ofsuppressing the spike and wave discharge in absence seizures (petit mal) and
decreasing the frequency, amplitude, duration and spread of discharge in minor motor
seizures.
Health and Safety Code Section 11377 (a) provides that every person who possesses ariy
controlled substance classified as Schedule III, IV, or V and is not a narcotic drug, without a
prescription from a physician, dentist, podiatrist, or veterinarian licensed to practice in
California, shall be punished•by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of not more than
one year. Health and Safety Code Section 11375 makes it an alternate misdemeanor/felony
for any person to possess for sale, or sell clonazepam. Health and Safety Code Section
11375 also creates an exception to the general rule with regard to the simple possession of
clonazepam. Thus, the simple possession of clonazepam is not a criminal offense. This bill
eliminates this exception, and makes the simple possession of clonazepam a misdemeanor
punishable by up to one year in the county jail.
3) Juvenile Abuse of Clonazepam. According to juvenile officers of the San Diego Police
Department, there has been a huge increase in the amount of Rivotril (clonazepam) by
juveniles in the City of San Diego. Rivotril is referred to on the street as a "dollar date"
because each tablet costs a dollar and is one of the drugs used to facilitate rape.
The drug has hypnotic, sedative, and central nervous system depressive action. When mixed
with alcohol, the drug's effects are enhanced. Rivotril has similar effects as Rohypnol, which
can be a felony to possess, but the simple possession of Rivotril is not a criminal offense.
Abuse of Rivotril is frequently seen in San Diego because of San Diego's proximity to the
Mexican Border. Rivotril can • be obtained in Mexico by juveniles, without a prescription, for
as little as 25 cents a tablet.
Rivotril is more common for teenagers to possess than marijuana. It is cheaper, easier to
conceal, and more readily available. The "word on the street" is that there are no legal
repercussions for possessing the drug. Rivotril is.used morefrequently than Rohypnol in
sexual assaults. Such a dangerous drug should be illegal to possess. Unless the state makes
the possession of Rivotril illegal, there will be an increased use and abuse of this drug.
REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION:
Support
Los Angeles County District Attorneys Office
Opposition
None on File
Analysis Prepared by: Gregory Pagan ! PUB. S. / (916) 319-3744
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
MEMORANDUM
DATE: October 1, 1999
TO: Don MacNeil, Deputy District Attorney, County of San Diego
FROM: Debra Lance, Sergeant, Southern Division Juvenile Services Team
SUBJECT: Request for New Legislation (Re: Rivotril/Clonazepam)
PROBLEM:
Rivotril (Clonazepam), a Schedule IV controlled substance, is currently not illegal to possess. We
have seen an increase in the amount of Rivotril in the hands of the juveniles in Southern Division
and we are powerless to address the • issue.
SOLUTION:
Provide emergency legislation to assist us in keeping this. dangerous drug out of the hands of
juveniles in our community.
DISCUSSION:
During the last few months, we have seen a huge increase in the amount of Rivotril that is coming
into the hands of the juveniles in Southern Division. Rivotril is referred to on the street as a "dollar
date" because each tablet costs a dollar and is one of the drugs used to facilitate rape.
This drug has hypnotic, sedative, CNS (central nervous system) depressive action. When mixed
with alcohol, the drug's effects are enhanced. Taking this drug may cause the victim to lose
consciousness. If the victims remain conscious they may be so incapacitated by the drug, that they
are unable to fend off the sexual assault. The victim may also experience amnesia.
We have been aggressively trying to remove this dangerous drug from our community. We
previously received training that possession of Rivotril was a felony under 11377(a) H&S.
However, we recently received a legal opinion from the District Attorney's office that Rivotril
(Clonazepam), a Schedule IV controlled substance, is not illegal to possess. It is only illegal to
possess for sale or to sell (11375 H&S). This leaves us with no identified legal remedy to address
the problem of a juvenile who has one or two tablets in their pockets.
Rivotril has similar effects as Rohypnol, which is a felony to possess under 11377(a) H&S. The
difference is, Rohypnol is not legal to possess in the United States. Clonazepam is a commonly
prescribed drug for anxiety or seizure disorders.
Southern Division sees the majority of this drug due to the proximity to the Mexican Border.
Rivotril can be easily obtained in Mexico. Kids have told us that they purchase the Rivotril tablets
for 25 cents a tablet and sell them for a dollar a tablet.
Officer C.J. Green, one of our School Task Force officers, who works at Southwest High School
said, "Rivotril is more common for teenagers at Southwest to possess than marijuana. It is cheaper,
easier to conceal, and more readily available." The "word on the street" is that there are no
repercussions for possessing this drug. Sergeant Archambault-of the Sex Crimes Unit tells me that
Rivotril is now used more often than Rohypnol in drug facilitated sexual assaults. Victims often take
this drug not knowing its effects or someone crushes the tablet to powder and then puts it in the
victim's drink without the victim's knowledge.
It is currently illegal -for a minor to possess tobacco or alcohol. Common sense dictates that a
dangerous drug like Rivotril should also be illegal to possess. However, it seems that we have no
legal right to attempt to alleviate this problem, as it is not illegal to posses.
Unless something is done immediately, I fear an increased use and abuse of this drug.
We have asked for an opinion from our City Attorney about how officers are to proceed with this
issue. For example:
Although we have no legal right to seize the drug for mere possession, what civil liability will there
be if an officer doesn't seize the drug from a juvenile and the juvenile later overdoses from the drug
or is a victim/suspect in a sexual assault?
Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this serious issue facing the health and welfare
of the children of Southern Division. Please feel free to call me at 424-0425 if you have any
questions.
„,z2a4
Debbie Lance, Sergeant
Southern Division, Juvenile Services Team
cc: Fred Moeller, Captain, Southern Division
GREGORY THOMPSON
ASSISTANT a5TA1CT ATTORNEY
OFFICE OF
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
t.
PAUL J. PFINGST
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
September 14, 1999
Captain Fred Moeller
San Diego Police Department -Southern
1120 27th Street •
San Diego, CA 92154
South Bay Branch Circa
500 Third Aveauc
Chula Vista. CA 91910-5694
(619) 691-4695
Re: Herth & Safety Code § 11375 and Business & Professions Code § 4060
Dear Captoeller:
I am writing this letter to you to inform you that our office has decided not to
file misdemeanor charges (Business and Professions Code section 4060) against
individuals found to possess drugs covered by Health and Safety Code section 11375.
The Legal Policies Committee of our office made this decision after a thorough
evaluation. I have enclosed a copy of the above two statutes with this letter. Of
course, our office will continue to file cases in which a person possesses the drugs for
sale or transportation.
Business & Professions Code § 4060 is contained within the Healing Arts
division of the Business & Professions Code and is designed to regulate pharmacists.
There was also a recent Court of Appeal case (People v. Denison, (1998)-67
Cal.App.4' 962 and 68 Cal.App.4t.1283a) in which the justices chastised the Attorney
General for suggesting that a person possessing a small quantity of valium could be
prosecuted under Business & Professions Code § 4060. The court stated that allowing
prosecutions under Business & Professions Code § 4060 would conflict with the plain
meaning of Health & Safety Code § 11375 and defeat its purpose. While Denison has
now been depublished and is therefore not citable as authority, the committee agreed
with its analysis and thus we will not file misdemeanor cases.
Captain Fred Moeller.
September 14, 1999
Page 2
Does this effect'your officers? Yes. Your officers need to be very careful
before arresting people for 'simple possession' of those drugs. They need to make sure
that any seized drugs are in fact drugs contained within Health & Safety Code § 11377
and not Health & Safety Code § 11375.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 691-4909.
.Yours truly,
avid Greenberg
Chief South Bay Branch
Enclosures (3)
§ 11375. Possession for sale or sale of designated controlled substances;
application of section; punishment
Text of section operative until the terms of Section 3
_ of Stats.1996, c. 109 (S.B.1426) are met.
(a) As to the substances specified in subdivision (c), this section, and not Sections
11377, 11378, 11379, and 11380, shall apply. •
(b) Every person.who possesses for sale, or who sells, any substance specified in
subdivision (c) shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a period
of not more than one year or state prison.
(c) This section shall apply to any material, compound, mixture, or preparation
containing any of the following substances:
(1) Chlordiazepoxide.
(2) Clonazepam. —
(3) Cloraze
Diazep
(5) Fluraze
Loraze
(7) Mebuta
(8) Oxazep
(9) Prazep
(10) Tema
(11) Halaz
(12) Alpra
(13) Propo
(14) Die
(15) Phent
Pemol
(17) Fenflu
(18) Triazo
(Added by
(Amended
epate.
am.
para.
pam•
mate.
am.
am.
zepam.
epam.
zolam.
xyphene.
thylpropion.
termine.
ine.
ramine.
lam.
Stats.1984, c. 1635, § 63.)
by Stats.1992, c. 616 (S.B.2013), § 3.)
For text of section operative when the terms of
Section 3 of Stats.1996, c. 109 (S.B.1426) are met, see
Health and Safety Code § 11375, post.
IZsvoTR.�I..�
§ 11375. Possession for sale or sale of designated controlled substances;
application of section;
Text -of section operative when the terms of Section 3 of
Stats:1996, c. 109 (S.B.1426) are met.
(a) As to the substances specified in subdivision (c), this section, and not Sections
11377, 11378, 11379, and 11380, shall apply.
(b) Every person•who possesses for sale, or who sells, any substance specified in
subdivision (c) shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a period
of not more than one year or state prison.
(c) This section shall apply"'to any material, compound, mixture, or preparation
containing any of the following substances:
(1) Chlordiazepoxide.
(2) Clonazepam.
(3) Clorazepate.
(4) Diazepam.
(5) Flurazepam.
(6) Lorazepam.
(7) Mebutamate.
(8) Oxazepam.
(9) Prazepam.
(10) Temazepam.
(11) Halazepam.
(12) Alprazolam.
(13) Propoxyphene.
(14) Diethylpropion.
(15) Phentermine.
(16) Pemoline.
(17) Triazolam.
(Added by Stats.1984, c. 1635, § 63.)
(Amended by Stats.1992, c. 616 (S.B.20.13), § 3; Stats.1996, c. 109 (S.B.1426),
§ 2, eff. July 1, 1996.)
For text of section operative until the terms of Section 3 of Stats.1996, c. 109
(S.B.1426) are met, see Health and Safety Code § 11375, ante.
§ 4060. Controlledsubstances; possession
No person shall possess any controlled substance, except that furnished to a
person upon the precription of a physician, dentist, podiatrist, pr veterinarian.
This section shall not apply to the possession of any controlled substance by a
manufacturer, wholesaler, pharmacy, physician, podiatrist, dentist, or
veterinarian, when in stock in containers correctly labeled with the name and
address of the supplier or producer.
(Added by Stats.1996, c. 890 (A.B.2802),, § 3. Amended by Stats.1997, c. 549
(S.B.1349), § 40.)
§ 11375. Possession for sale or sale of designated controlled substances;
application of section;
i
Text of section operative when the terms of Section 3 of
Stats.1996,—c. 109 (S.B.1426) are met.
(a) As to the substances specified in subdivision (c), this section, and not Sections
11377, 11378,-11379, and 11380, shall apply.
(b) Every person•who possesses for sale, or who sells, any substance specified in
subdivision (c) shall be punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a period
of not more than one year or state prison.
(c) This section shall apply to any material, compound, mixture, or preparation
containing any of the following substances:
(1) Chlordiazepoxide.
(2) Clonazepam.
(3) Clorazepate.
(4) Diazepam.
(5) Flurazepam.
(6) Lorazepam.
(7) Mebutamate.
(8) Oxazepam.
(9) Prazepam.
(10) Temazepam.
(11) Halazepam. +
•
(12) Alprazolam.
(13) Propoxyphene. •
(14) Diethylpropion.
(15) Phentermine. 0
(16) Pemoline.
(17) Triazolam.
(Added by Stats.1984, c. 1635, § 63.)
(Amended by Stats.1992, c. 616 (S.B.2013), § 3; Stats.1996, c. 109 (S.B.1426),
§ 2, eff. July 1, 1996.)
For text of section operative until the terms of Section 3 of Stats.1996, c. 109
(S.B.1426) are met, see Health and Safety Code § 11375, ante.
§ 4060. Controlled' substances;, possession
No person shall possess any controlled substance, except that furnished to a --
person upoilitpe prczcription of a physician, dentist, podiatrist, or veterinarian..
This section shall not apply to the possession of any controlled substance. by a
manufacturer, wholesaler, pharmacy, physician, podiatrist, dentist, or
veterinarian, when in stock in containers correctly: labeled with the name and
address of the supplier or producer.
(Added by Stats.1996, c. 890 (A.B.2802),. § 3. Amended by Stats.1997, c. 549
(S.B.1349), § 40.)
DATE ISSUED: REPORT NO:
ATTENTION: Honorable Mayor and City Council
Agenda of
SUBJECT: Amendment to San Diego Municipal Code Article 2 by adding
Division 32 and new Sections 52.3201, 52.3202, 52.3203, 52.3204,
52.3205, and 52.3206.
SUMMARY
Issues - Should the City of San Diego create an emergency ordinance to amend
the Municipal Code requiring a valid prescription for the simple possession of
Clonazepam.
Manager's Recommendations - Approve the adoption of the emergency
ordinance.
Other Recommendation - None
Fiscal Impact - No fiscal impact to the City is expected. The new ordinance will
allow law enforcement to arrest individuals who possess Clonazepam without a
prescription. The enforcement of the new ordinance would be assimilated into
normal day-to-day police activities.
BACKGRQUjD
Prior to the 1984 Legislative Session, the possession of Clonazepam, without a
prescription, was a felony per section 11377 of the Health and Safety Code. Clonazepam
is a specified, Schedule TV, nonnarcotic drug. During the 1984 Legislative Session,
Assembly Bill 3876, amended the Health and Safety Code creating a new statute making
it a misdemeanor or a felony for any person to possess for sale, or sell, any of the
substances listed as Schedule IV, nonnarcotic drugs. The language used in the creation of
Assembly Bill 3876 unintentionally negated portions of Section 11377 of the Health and
Safety Code and allowed persons to possess _Clonazepam without a Doctor's prescription.
Clonazepam is an extremely strong prescription medication used in the treatment of
anxiety disorders. It is an anticonvulsant with a pharmacological profile similar to other
anxiolytic/sedative benzodiazepines. Unfortunately, Clonazepam is being used as a
recreational drug by adults and is quickly becoming a drug of choice for juveniles.
Clonazepam can be easily obtained in Mexico, for approximately $.25 a pill, without a
prescription, and resold in the United States for approximately $1.00 per pill. The drug
produces serious motor impairment, disorientation, amnesia, and if ingested in high doses
could lead to coma and respiratory failure. Clonazepam is commonly found in junior
high schools, high schools, and college campuses. There are several documented cases
where Clonazepam was used to facilitate sexual assaults.
The San Diego Police Department reports a steady increase in the abuse of this drug by
juveniles. Clonazepam is commonly referred to on the street as a "dollar date" because
each tablet costs a dollar and is one of the drugs used to facilitate a sexual assault. Due to
the hypnotic, sedative and nervous system depressive action of Clonazepam, its effects
are enhanced when mixed with alcohol.
Clonazepam's popularity with juveniles and adults is increasing. Currently, police
officers have no authority to seize these dangerous drugs from adults or juveniles who are
in simple possession of them without a prescription.
The State of California is attempting to correct the legal loophole created with the 1984
Assembly Bill 3876. On January 4, 2000, Assemblyman Howard Wayne introduced
Assembly Bill 163. The new bill, if approved would make it a misdemeanor to possess
Clonazepam without a valid prescription. Assembly Bill 163 is due for a Senate vote in
June 2000. Once approved, the bill would become law on January 2001.
We request the enactment of an emergency ordinance that would immediately allow law
enforcement personnel to arrest individuals who possess Clonazepam without a valid
prescription. The emergency ordinance, when enacted, would protect juveniles and
adults from the dangers of this potent drug. In addition, it would help decrease the use of
Clonazepam in sexual assmilts.
We request that the City Attorney and the Chief of Police be authorized to administer and
enforce the provisions of the municipal code. Violations of the code should be
prosecuted as misdemeanors and subject to fines and custody in the county jail.
ALTERNATIVE
None
-2-
Respectfully submitted,
ave Bejarano
Chief of Police
BEJARANO/RJK
-3-
Approved: Michael Uberuaga
City Manager
Q
IIEGO UNION -TRIBUNE I TuESDAY, APRIL 18, 2000
mommartisomma
JAW° / Union -Tribune
sentenced
ice officer.
d statement in
thy he believes
San. Diego restricts .medication
reportedly used. in 'date rapes!
By Kelly Thornton
STAFPWRITER
The San Diego City Council took
the unusual step yesterday of creat-
ing an emergency law that immedi-
ately makes it illegal to possess the
anti-amdety drug Clonazepam with-
out a prescription.
Council members adopted the or-
dinance without debate a few days
after Police Chief David Bejarano
warned that the drug is increasingly
being used for sexual assaults.
"It's being used for date rape and
that's what we're trying to combat,"
City Councilman Juan Vargas said
dining yesterday's meeting.
San Diego police Lt. Bob.Kanaski
of the countywide Narcotics Task
Force said the drug is becoming
more prevalent among youths, with
reports of the pills being found on
school campuses several times a•
week.
Carrier
The drug is similar to Rohypnol,
or "roofies," which gained notoriety
as the first so-called date rape drug.
Both drugs can cause amnesia or
serious motor impairment, and if
ingested in high doses could lead to
coma or respiratory failure. .
• Also, the use of either drug poses
a challenge for police because
traces disappear from the blood
stream in eight to. 24 hours, and
many women who become victims
ingest the drug unwittingly Often
an attacker drops the pills in a vic-
tim's drink
Police are aware of two cases in
which Clonazepam was used to sex-
ually assault women, Icanaski said.
However,. authorities suspect the
drug is being used by sexual preda-
tors more frequently.
The pM
Cost about 25 cents The cases would be prose
apiece in Mexico arid are resold as misdemeanors Ounishable
here for about $1 each, earning fmes, jail, or both.
• j
!7.
P• ier, which would be improved, ac-
COrdina to the
• them the street name of "dollar
date."
The neW law means San D'
police officers are among the
the state to be given the green light
to arrest people who possess Clona-
zepam without a doctor's approvidT"
Before 1984, possession of Clung-
zepam without a prescription
illegal, but the law was changed
year to make possession legal
without a doctor's prescription,
Assembly bill has been 'introd
that woulcF close the loophole
make possessionrillegal once a: •
But if that law Oases
signed by/the governor, ft vvoul ;
become effective until January. «/
City Council's action yesterdayers that gap
Chuck Nicholsi the'''nals.P1
ORDINANCE NO. 2000 —
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AMENDING TITLE 10 OF THE NATIONAL CITY
MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 10.21
AND SECTIONS 10.21.010 THROUGH 10.21.070,
ALL PERTAINING TO RESTRICTING
POSSESSION OF CLONAZEPAM
WHEREAS, during -.the 1984 Legislative session, the California Legislature
amended Health and Safety Code Section 11357, Possession for Sale or Sale of Designated
Controlled Substances, which had the unintended legal effect of making simple possession of
several substances, including Clonazepam, legal; and
WHEREAS, an increasing number of drug -facilitated sexual assaults are being
reported in the vicinity of the City of National City; and
WHEREAS, the drug Clonazepam has been linked to drug -facilitated sexual
assaults, and is readily available without a prescription in Mexico; and
WHEREAS, the administration of Clonazepam is difficult to detect, causes
amnesia, and makes a person vulnerable to sexual or physical assault; and
WHEREAS, the onset of the effects of Clonazepam may occur within minutes, at
which time a victim often loses track of events, later waking up in an unfamiliar environment,
inappropriately clothed and having been sexually assaulted; and
WHEREAS, currently there is no law in the City of National City that prohibits
simple possession of Clonazepam without a prescription, and immediate legislative action is
therefore needed to protect the safety of the citizens of the City of National City;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of
National City, as follows:
Section 1. That Title 10 of the National City Municipal is hereby amended by adding
Chapter 10.21 and Sections 10.21.010 through 10.21.070, to read as follows:
CHAPTER 10.210
POSSESSION OF CLONAZEPAM
Sections:
10.21.010 Purpose.
10.21.020 Definitions.
10.21.030 Prohibitions on possession.
10.21.040 Enforcement authority.
10.21.050 Enforcement and remedies.
10.21.060 Strict liability offense.
10.21.070 Repeals.
Section 10.21.010 Purpose. The City Council of the City of National City
finds and declares that:
A. There are documented police reports of Clonazepam being used to facilitate
sexual assault.
B. Currently, there is no state law that prohibits mere possession of Clonazepam
without a valid prescription, and Clonazepam is readily and inexpensively available in Mexico.
C. There is a current threat to the public safety and welfare, in that abuse of
Clonazepam by juveniles and others facilitates other crimes due to its easy access, low price and
powerful effect.
D. Accordingly, until the Legislature enacts regulations restricting or prohibiting the
possession of Clonazepam, it is necessary to prohibit its possession without a prescription in
order to safeguard the public health, welfare and safety in the exercise of the City's police
powers.
Section 10.21.020 Definitions. "Clonazepam" means any drug, substance or
compound, whether legal or illegal, that contains Clonazepam, as described in California Health
and Safety Code Section 11057(d)(6).
Section 10.21.030 Prohibitions on possession. Except as authorized by law
and as otherwise provided in subdivision (b) or Article 7 (commencing with Section 4211) of
Chapter 9 of division 2 of the Business and Professions Code, it is unlawful for any person to
possess Clonazepam or any substance that contains Clonazepam without a valid prescription.
Section 10.21.040 Enforcement authority. The Chief of Police is authorized
to administer and enforce the provisions of this Chapter. The City Attorney and the Chief of
Police respectively, may exercise any enforcement or prosecution powers provided in Title 1 of
this Code.
Section 10.21.050 Enforcement and remedies. Each violation of Section
10.21.030 is a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of $1,000, imprisonment for six months, or
both, under Section 1.20.010. The City Attorney may, in addition, also seek injunctive relief and
civil penalties in the Superior Court or pursue any other administrative remedy provided in Title
1 of this Code.
Section 10.21.060 Strict liability offense. Violations of this Chapter shall be
treated as strict liability offenses, regardless of intent.
Section 10.21.070 Repeal. Unless amended, this Chapter 10.21 shall be
automatically repealed and uncodified on the effective date of the enactment of State law
regulating or prohibiting possession of Clonazepam without a prescription.
2000 Ordinance
2
Restricting Possession of Clonazepam
Section 2. The City Clerk shall, upon the effective date following enact,'lent of State
law regulating or prohibiting the possession of Clonazepam, decodify this Chapter and cause its
removal from the Municipal Code.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 6th day of June, 2000.
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
George H. Waters, Mayor
2000 Ordinance
3
Restricting Possession of Clonazepam
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
June 13, 2000
MEETING DATE
3
AGENDA ITEM NO.
/ ITEM TITLE
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — New Covenant Tabernacle Community Outreach
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
Kathleen Trees, Acting Director
EXPLANATION
Building and Safety
This is a request from New Covenant Tabernacle to conduct a one -day community outreach on the
parking lot at the Plaza Bonita Shopping Center, on July 7, 2000. The event includes a performance,
music performed by church members, drama and a speaker. The hours are from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
The event qualifies for a waiver of fees pursuant to Cif)/ Council Policy No. 704.
2
Environmental Review
_X_ N/A
Financial Statement
The City has incurred $101.00 in costs in processing this Temporary Use Permit application.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of
approval and grant the waiver of fees.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below )
Resolution No.
Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended conditions of approval.
A-200 (9/80)
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
BUILDING & SAFETY
1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD., NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950
A PL CATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
APP ATI
I ON IS O PAL FREE MADE AND FOR
DESCRIBED E SE PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION OF THE NATIONAL
ITY
S
W.
Temporary Use Permits are ministerial administrative regulations intended to provide orderly and effective
management specific list oftemporary
may [snd uses the action of the Building Official pve exceptional tics requiring their review and
ursuant to Municipal Code section
limitations. Any permit applicant mayappeal
15.60.045.
Class A & B use Application for a Temporary Use Permit must be filed 15 w rkin days prior to the
commencement of the activitylevent.
Activities/events involving the use or areas of operation within the state highway jurisdiction shall be filed not less
than six (6) month prior to the requested activity/event.
r ,.S (Print or Type):
SPONSORING ORGANIZATION(s): —
ORGANIZATION ADDRESS: /0
City
LOCATION OF EVENT:
DATE(S) REQUESTED FOR EVENT: FROM
HOURS OF USE ON DAY OF EVENT: FROM EA.M. P.M TO .9 0D A.M. / '
(BEGIN SETUP) DATE TIME A.M. /6 — ( END TUP DATE 7 7 TIME A.M.M
//.
(BEGIN TEARDOWN) 7'I DATE TIME RDO
A.M• 60— ( END TEAWN) DATE TIME/Q A.Aelq
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: _,« M—GcLT!�/E
(A brief summary of the event/ may be requested. A summary of the event activity maybe attached to the application)
•
NAME OF PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EVENT, WHO WILL BE ON -SITE THE DAY OF THE EVENT:
COO G 001
AN
HOW MAY THIS PERSON BE CONTACTED?
f'FRFo
SPECIFIC USE REQUEST:
JUSTIFICATION: REQUEST To3ELL OR S, EmsNO[�
VE ALCOHOL BEVERAGES: YES[ ] NO[✓-- WILL FOOD/ DRINK BE SOLD: YES[ 1
_
(Note: The City Council will not approve the sale or consumption of alcohol in City parks in conjunction with any event
requiring
parks, such ash the Communityt Center,pwhich will continuef lto be subject to the approval oicy regarding thsale or f consumption
within buildings
City Council.)
WILL TENTS OR CANOPIES BE USED?: YES [ ]
NO [ ] (If "YES,", permit may be required from Fire Department)
(If "YES," complete attached supplemental questionnaire font))
WAIVER OF FEES REQUESTED: YES [ ] NO [ ]
FACILITIES: (When Applicable) REQUEST ASSISTANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING:
NOISE, CROWD, TRAFFIC CONTROL: No
SECURITY CONTROL:
ND
PARKING/BARRICADES.
Ai
EXTERIOR LIGHTING/ELECTRICAL: N0
TRASH DISPOSAL/SITE CLEAN-UP AFTER EVENT:
SANITARY FACILITIES: Ar0
0
PLEASE COMPLETE (Print or Type)
NAME OF APPLICANT: TO H IJ 5612xFa))J o
ADDRESS: I DD I HA- b-C.Oru ku .
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT:
PHONI G(i> �7 OO
DATE: //• e/6D
(THIS FORM BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN ENDORSED BY THE BUILDING & SAFETY DIRECTOR)
(FOR OFFICE USE ONLY)
PERMIT FEES' PERMIT NO.:
USE GROUP: USE CLASS:
BOND: PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE:
SPECIFIC STIPULATIONS / COMMENTS:
(RECEIVED DATE STAMP)
APPROVALS / STIPULATIONS' (Check Where Applicable):
PLANNING YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
Initial Date '
FIRE YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [
Iduet Date
PUBLIC WORKS YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
Initial Date
Initial
Initial
Initial
Initial
initial
Initial
Initial
FINANCE YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
Date
POLICE YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
Date
PARKS & REC. YES [ ] NO [ ] ' SEE STIP [ I
Date
ENGINEERING YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
Date
CITY ATTORNEY YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ I
Date
RISK MANAGER YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
Date
COMMUNITY DEVELOP. YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
Date
Initial Date
OTHER YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ]
CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE:
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT: APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] WAIVER OF FEES: APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ]
PROPERTY NOTIFICATION REQUIRED: YES [ ] NO [ ]
COMMENTS:
DATE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT
RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: New Covenant Tabernacle
EVENT: Community Outreach
DATE OF EVENT: Friday July 7, 2000
TIME OF EVENT: 7:00 a.m. through 7:00 p.m.
APPROVALS:
PLANNING
FIRE
YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE COMMENTS [ ]
YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE COMMENTS [ x ]
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. Permit to be secured from the Fire Department, permit to erect or operate a Tent/Canopy per
Article 32 of the Uniform Fire Code. Permit fee, sixty five ($65.00) dollars
2. Tent/Canopy to be flame retardant, State Fire Marshal seal to be attached.
3. No open flames or smoking inside or adjacent to the tent/canopy. Signs to be posted — NO
SMOKING.
4. Exitways to be maintained in an unobstructed manner at all times. Exitway to be clear of all
obstruction for its entire width.
5. Exitways to be illuminated and posted.
6. Fire extinguishers shall be on the premises, Type 2-A:10-BC, minimum number of fire
extinguishers shall be determined by the Fire Department upon receipt of canopy/tent sizes.
Travel distance not to exceed seventy five (75) feet.
7. Fire safety inspection to be conducted by fire department personnel, prior to opening to the public.
8. Fire Department access roads shall be provided and maintained at all times.
9. Automobiles and other internal combustion engines shall be a minimum distances of thirty (30)
feet from all tents and canopies.
10. Fire hydrants shall not be block or obstructed.
City of National City
Building & Safety Department
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA. 91950
TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FEE WAIVER REQUEST
SUPPLEMENTAL OUESTIONNAIRE
City Council Policy No. 704 contains the criteria for granting waivers of T.U.P.
processing fees by the City Council. This Supplemental Questionnaire will be used to
evaluate whether the event or sponsoring organization for a T.U.P. meet the criteria for a
fee waiver. Accordingly, please answer all questions fully and completely.
City Council Policy No. 704
The City Council shall waive T.U.P. processing fees only in the case of a. non-profit
organization, and when such organization can demonstrate that the event for which the
T.U.P. is requested will not generate any income to the organization, or that the net
proceeds of the event for which the T.U.P. is requested result in:
1. direct financial benefit to an individual who resides or is employed
in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons
or a death in the family; or
2. direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of
sales tax; or
3. direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or
other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as
Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club; or
4. direct financial benefit to an organization which has been the direct
recipient of City or Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funding.
PLEASE FULLY AND COMPLETELY ANSWER THE FOLLOWING:
Is the event for which the T.U.P. is sought sponsored by a non-profit
organization?
V YES (If YES, please proceed to Question No. 4)
NO (IfNO, please sign the bottom of this form and submit this
form with the T.U.P. Application to the Building & Safety
Department)
2. If the answer to Question No. 1 was YES, please state the name and type of
organization sponsoring the event for which the T.U.P. is sought and then proceed
to Question No. 3. 1
Name of Sponsoring Organization ivevIIJ aV eilgr i- TaI em tGP( G urck_
Type of Organization (Service Club,
Church, Social Service
Agency, etc.)
3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds to the sponsoring organization?
YES (If YES, please proceed to Question No. 4)
/
V NO (If NO, please sign the bottom of this form and submit the with the
T.U.P. Application to the Building & Safety Department)
4. If the answer to Question 3 is YES, will the proceeds provide a direct financial
benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in
dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family?
YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided
below)
NO (If NO, please proceed to Question No. 5)
If YES, please explain who is to benefit from the proceeds and the general nature
of the financial hardship:
5. Will the event provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the
generation of sales tax?
YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided
below)
/..
(If NO, please proceed to Question No. 6)
If YES, please explain how the direct financial benefit to the city will occur:
6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services
agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as
Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club?
YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided
below)
V NO (If NO, please proceed to Question No. 7)
If YES, please explain the organizations that are to benefit from the proceeds of
the event and how the proceeds will be used by those organizations.
2
F
7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization which has
been the direct recipient of City of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funding?
YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided
below)
NO (If NO, please sign the bottom of this form and submit the with the
T.U.P. Application to the Building & Safety Department)
If YES, please state the year the City of Community Develop Block Grant
(CDBG) funds were received and how those funds were used:
Year funds were received.
Funds were used to •
frirb
DATE
Internal Revenue Service Department of the Treasury
District Director
Date: Wkik 1 4 1966
New Covenant Tabernacle
P.O. Box 7321
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Employer Identification Number.
33-0025278
Accounting Period Ending:
June 30
Form 990 Required: (] Yes x31 No
Person to Contact:
M. Tomback
Contact Telephone Number.
(213) 894-4885
Dear Applicant:
Based on information supplied, and assuming your operations will be as stated
in your application for recognition of exemption, we have determined you are exempt
from Federal income tax under section 501(c:)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code.
We have further determined that you are not a private foundation within the
meaning of section 509(a) of the Code, because you are an organization described in
section 509(a)(1) and 170(b)(1)(A)(i).
If your sources of support, or your purposes, character, or method of operation
change, please let us know so we can consider the effect of the change on your
exempt status and foundation status. Also, you should inform us of all changes in
your name or address.
As of January 1, 1984, you are liable for taxes under the Federal Insurance
Contributions Act(social security taxes) on remuneration of $100 or more you pay to
each of your employees during a calendar year. You are not liable for the tax
imposed under the Federal Unemployment Tax Act (FUTA).
Since you are not a private foundation, you are not subject to the excise taxes
under Chapter 42 of the Code. However, you are not automatically exempt from other
Federal excise taxes. If you have any questions about excise, employment, or other
Federal taxes, please let us know.
Donors may deduct contributions to you as provided in section 170 of the Code.
Bequests, legacies, devises, transfers, or gifts to you or for your use are
deductible for Federal estate and gift tax purposes if they meet the applicable
provisions of sections 2055, 2106, and 2522 of the Code.
The box checked in the heading of this letter shows whether you must file Form
990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax. If Yes is checked, you are
required to file Form 990 only if your gross receipts each year are normally more
than $25,000. If a return is required,. it must be filed by the 15th day of the fifth
month after the end of your annual accounting period. The law imposes a penalty of
$10 a day, up to a maximum of $5,000, when a return is filed late, unless there
is reasonable cause for the delay.
(over)
P.O. Box 2350, Los Angeles, CA 90053
Letter 947(DO) (Rev. 10-83
. You are not required to file Federal income.tax returns unless you are subject
to the tax on unrelated business income under section 511 of the Code. If you are
subject to this tax, you must file an income tax return on Form 990—T, Exempt
Organization Business Income Tax Return. In this letter, we are not determining
whether any of your present or proposed activities are unrelated trade. or business
as defined in section 513 of the Code. -•
You need an employer identification number even if you have no employees. If an
employer identification number was not entered on your application, a number will be
assigned to you and you will be advised of it. Please use that number on all returns
you file and in all correspondence with the Internal Revenue Service.
Because this letter could help resolve any questions about your exempt status
and foundation status, you should keep it in your permanent records.
If you have any questions, please contact the person whose name and telephone
number are shown in the heading of this letter.
Sincerely yours,
District Director
Letter 947(DO) (Rev. 10-8:
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a
minimum of $1.000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property
damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional
insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached
to this permit. /��^
organization VFW CD\/ & N 1 TT11BC,R-N a m
Person in charge of activity SOHt' ',4.C.G2.Re57Ni711)
Address WI H�RBtSGI� NAT A, t. C4-r c 9i9‘;(3
Telphone0r1)26C7-0300 Date(s) of use
7777 / 200o
HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT
The undersigned hereby agree(s) to hold the City of National City and the Parking
Authority of the City of National City harmless and indemnify the City of National City
and the Parking Authority of the City of National City from and against all claims,
demands, costs, losses. damages. injuries. litigation and liability arising out of or
related to the use of public property by permittee or permitee's agents. employees or
contractors.
-fitze 4k U R�tt
Signatu Applicant Official Title Date
(For Office Use Only)
Certificate of Insurance approved
198712
n A ORD�
PROWLCE
ER :... x:...:,..,......
.. ROBERT F. DRIVER COMPANY, INC.4o-2osa
420 S. BROADWAY
ESCONDIDO, CA 92025
INSURED
New Covenant Tabernacle
Pastor John F. Sorrentino
1001 Harbison Ave.
National City CA 91950
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO UPON THE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE RIGHTS
DOES NOT AMEND. CERTIFICATEDOESOR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
COMPANY
A GUIDEONE INSURANCE
DATE (MMIDDM')
06/01/00
COMPANY
B
COMPANY
C
COMPANY
D
.. :. .:.: .>vU::..: :.:..::n.r..v wM..:::i:.4'G.::"v">rie,... ::Q.:.:.::.: •Y.-l:t:%ii }i:(iiJi-n. ::�`W.A::.:: .:::::C'.........
,..:.x.IF:<Vn.y.�".ul�i:i:.�>.:...:'.Mi>.. .i:•':C:;i: _YyPY.:jw:i.i: ...:.. :: � Si:,:i: .`�: n^'..
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT�„i`yxr;4::,,:;::: :,':3_xA'-'.,.•,w,.'y?:3r:;lov.?:'i-?`:`'F•. .:>;:.'<'%"s.nw4>:h�:;.>f>.....:.:;;;A::..........:.
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW H •" RED MED
ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION REO NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDINGAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED
OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN S SUBJECT TO LLL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
CO TYPE Of INSURANCE LTR POLICYEFFECTIVEPOLICYEXPIRATIONDATE IMM/DDmI DATE WMM/DDNYI
POUCY NUMBER
A
GENERAL LIABILITY
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS MADE U OCCUR
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
GARAGE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
1180925
4/01 /00
4/01/01
TRIADS
GENERAL AGGREGATE
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGO
PERSONAL & AOV INJURY
EACH OCCURRENCE
FIRE DAMAGE tAny one fire)
MED EXP (Any one Person)
COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
$ 2 000,000
2,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
$ 1,000,000
$ 5,000
BODILY INJURY
(Per person)
BODILY INJURY
(Per accident)
PROPERTY DAMAGE
EXCESS LIABILITY
AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT
OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY
EACH ACCIDENT
5
$
UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
THE PROPRIETOR/
PARTNERS/EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS ARE:
OTHER
INCL
EXCL
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSAOCATIONSNEHICLESISPECULL ITEMS
CERTIFICATE HOLDER HAS BEEN NAMED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED IN RESPECTS TO
A COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAM BEING HELD ON JULY 07, 2000 AT THE
PLAZA BONITA PARKING LOT.
GERTi[F3LD1
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
BUILDING & SAFETY
1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD.
NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950
w
AGGREGATE
EACH OCCURRENCE
AGGREGATE
WC STATU-
TORY UMITTI
EL EACH ACCIDENT
H-
FR
S
EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMA
EL DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE
�A�...' `RGvn,\nR^W."':M .. > rl - q Y•:'fyk
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
100 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT.
BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBUGATION OR LIABILITY
OF p ' KIND UPON THE COMPANY, iTS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
REPRESENTATIVE
To:
City of National City
Office of the City Clerk
1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950-4397
Michael R. Dalla, CMC - City Clerk
(619) 336-4228 Fax: (619) 336-4229
Mayor George Waters
Vice Mayor Fred Soto
Councilman Mitch Beauchamp
Councilman Ralph Inzunza
Councilman Ron Morrison
ITEM # 4
6/13/00
Date: June 7, 2000
From: Michael R. Dalla, CMC, City Clerk 4
Subject: Approval of Temporary Use Permit (TUP) for Car Show at
Sweetwater High School on June 5, 2000
Discussion during the June 6th City Council Meeting called into question the
accuracy of the Minutes of the April 25th City Council Meeting. Those Minutes
reflected the unanimous vote of the Council in favor of the TUP application for a
car show at Sweetwater High School on June 5, 2000. It was publicly suggested
that the minutes were wrong and needed to be corrected.
A review of the audio tape of the meeting irrefutably confirms that the Minutes
accurately reflected the unanimous vote of the Council to approve the TUP for the
car show. Anyone who desires is welcome to review the tape.
MRD/mla
Recycled Paper
ITEM #5
6/13/00
DISCUSSION OF QUARTERLY MEETINGS FOR
CLAIMS/LITIGATION REVIEW.
(Councilman Inzunza)