Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 06-20 CC AGENDA PKTAGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CIVIC CENTER 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY - JUNE 20, 2000 - 3:00 P.M. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY CITY MANAGER, TOM G. MCCABE INVOCATION APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 13, 2000 MAYOR'S PRESENTATION Alliance Healthcare Foundation COUNCIL AGENDA 6/20/00 PAGE 2 PRESENTATION Employee Introduction Program PUBLIC HEARING 1. Public Hearing — An Updated Housing Element of the National City General Plan. (Case File No. GP-1999-1) (Planning) CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. 2. Resolution No. 2000-67 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City awarding a contract to Roejack Roofing, Inc. for the replacement of the roofing system for the Kimball Senior Center Project. (Engineering Spec. No. 00-3) (Engineering) 3. Resolution No. 2000-68 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the work and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion for the El Toyon Ballfield Improvement Project. (Engineering Spec. No. 99-7) (Engineering) 4. Resolution No. 2000-69 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Motorola, Inc. for the purchase of a Mobile Data System for the Police Department. (Police) COUNCIL AGENDA 6/20/00 PAGE 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) 5. Resolution No. 2000-70 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute a service agreement renewal with U.S. Wireless for maintenance of the Police Department's 800 MHz Communication System. (Police) 6. Resolution No. 2000-71 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the preliminary budget for Fiscal Year 2000-01. (City Manager) 7. Resolution No. 2000-72 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City setting the effective date of the 24th Street name change to July 10, 2000. (Building & Safety) 8. Resolution No. 2000-73 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidates' statements submitted to the voters at an election to be held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000. (City Clerk) 9. Resolution No. 2000-74 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City calling and giving notice of the holding of a General Municipal Election to be held on Tuesday, November 7, 2000 for the election of certain officers as required by the provisions of the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities. (City Clerk) COUNCIL AGENDA 6/20/00 PAGE 4 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont) 10. Resolution No. 2000-75 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San. Diego to consolidate a General Municipal Election to be held on November 7, 2000, with the Statewide General Election to be held on that date pursuant to Section 10403 of the Elections Code. (City Clerk) 11. WARRANT REGISTER NO. 50 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $192,999.99 12. Claim for Damages: Warren Eugene Wray. (City Clerk) 13. Claim for Damages: Darrow Keith Johnson. (City Clerk) 14. Claim for Damages: Darlene Dent. (City Clerk) 15. Claim for Damages: Khallid Ngufu. (City Clerk) 16. Claim for Damages: Jason McNeal. (City Clerk) 17. Claim for Damages: Rozzell Jordan. (City Clerk) 18. Claim for Damages: Terrence Lenon Ellis. (City Clerk) ORDINANCE FOR INTRODUCTION 19. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending Title 15 of the National City Municipal Code by amending Chapter 15.12 relating to moved buildings. (Building & Safety) COUNCIL AGENDA 6/20/00 PAGE 5 OLD BUSINESS 20. Fire Station Phase Ill Report. (Fire) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 21. Letter from the Boys & Girls Clubs of National City requesting a $250 donation from the City to help defray the costs associated with the Traveling Youth Soccer team tournament. NEW BUSINESS 22. Report on Municipal Pool. (Parks & Recreation) 23. Summer Concert. (Parks &Recreation) 24. Notice of Decision — Planned Development Permit for a 38-unit motel at the northeast corner of 8th Street and Roosevelt Avenue. (Applicant: Raman V. Patel) (Case File No. PD-1994-4) (Planning) 25. Notice of Decision — Planned Development Permit for a community room/learning center and leasing office and variance for a reduced front yard setback at 1705 E. 16th Street. (Applicant: Southern California Housing Development Corp.) (Case File Nos. PD-2000-3 and Z-2000-3) (Planning) 26. Temporary Use Permit — National City Chamber of Commerce Taste of National City. (Building & Safety) 27. Temporary User Permit — Beaudry R.V. Parking Lot Sale and Show. (Building & Safety) COUNCIL AGENDA 6/20/00 PAGE 6 NEW BUSINESS (cont.) -> CITY MANAGER -* CITY ATTORNEY —> OTHER STAFF -* MAYOR —> CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. ADJOURNMENT Next Regular City Council Meeting - July 18, 2000, at 3:00 p.m. — Council Chambers, Civic Center TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE r`— Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor DATE: JUNE 1, 2000 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: MAYOR WATERS SUBJECT: COUNCIL AGENDA --- JUNE 20, 2000 Please include under the Mayor's Presentation: Alliance Healthcare Foundation. GEORGH. WATERS MAYOR s Recycled Paper City of National City Personnel Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Phone: (619) 336-4300 TDD: (619) 336-4304 MEMORANDUM DATE TO FROM SUBJECT : June 13, 2000 Park Morse, Assistant City M q Roger C. DeFratis, Personn-1-Director EMPLOYEE INTRODUCTION PROGRAM The City Council has requested that all new full-time employees hired each month be invited to the third City Council meeting of each month. The attendance of the employee is voluntary and will not be paid overtime for such appearance. The below department director(s) are requested to extend such an invitation to the listed employee(s) and confirm the employee(s) attendance, if applicable, with the City Manager by the Thursday preceding the meeting. Kathleen Trees Claudia Gallegos/Permit Technician May 16, 2000 Chief DiCerchio Edward Becker/Property & Evidence Unit Supv. David Noteware/Police Support Services Mgr. May 30, 2000 June 8, 2000 xc: Kathleen Trees Chief DiCerchio RCD:Im MEMOSDOC-1 Recycled Paper City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 ITEM TITLE PREPARED BY PUBLIC HEARING —AN UPDATED HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE NATIONAL CITY GENERAL PLAN CASE FILE NO. GP-1999-1 SteveDEPARTMENT Ray Planning EXPLANATION Cotton Beland Associates has drafted the updated Housing Element, in compliance with State law. The State Department of Housing and Community Development certified the 1992 Housing Element. The new update may be self -certified by the City. The City Council reviewed a summary of the housing needs analysis and programs at a workshop on March 8. The same information, prepared by the consultant, had also been previously reviewed by the Planning Commission. Comments received were addressed in the draft Housing Element. The Planning Commission held a hearing June 5 and suggested two additional, technical changes: • That Program No. 2 (page 66 of the Housing Element) provide loan funding for rehab of rented single- family homes as well as apartments. This will require rewording, since the existing program already offers loans for single-family homes. • That Program No. 21 (page 76) be scheduled for completion by the end of fiscal year 2004. One Commissioner also suggested that Program No. 22 should be deleted from the Housing Element. After discussion, however, the Commission took no action to recommend this. Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A N/A Previously adopted Negative Declaration Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the Planning Commission recommendation. R612 BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the draft, updated Housing Element, with changes as explained above. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Draft Housing Element, previously distributed 2. Recommended Findings 3. Previously adopted Negative Declaration (Initial Study) and Addendum A-200 (9/80) Resolution No. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS 1. The updated Housing Element substantially complies with the provisions of Article 10.6 of the California Government Code, including addressing the needs of all income levels. 2. The City has met its fair share of the regional housing needs for the 1991-1999 Housing Element cycle, as determined by the San Diego Association of Governments. City and SANDAG records show that the City assisted 396 lower income households between 1991 and 1996, or more than ten times its fair share for the Housing Element cycle. 3. The updated Housing Element addresses the dispersion of lower income housing within the City. The Element contains housing goals, policies and programs to achieve a wide variety of housing throughout the City. This is consistent with the criterion that there be additional opportunities for affordable housing not only in areas within the City where concentrations of lower income households already exist, taking into account the availability of necessary public facilities and infrastructure. 4. No City actions or policies prevent the development of the identified sites pursuant to California Government Code Section 65583, or accommodation of the City's share of the total regional housing need, pursuant to Section 65584. As documented in the updated Housing Element, the City has sufficient vacant land for construction of housing needed for all household income levels, in accordance with estimates adopted by the San Diego Regional Association of Governments. No governmental constraints have been identified that would limit construction on the properties affordable to all household income levels. 5. Adopted Negative Declaration no. IS-1992-4 adequately addresses the updated Housing Element, since no significant environmental impacts result from changes in the Element or the City's environment. City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR Addendum to Initial Study IS-1992-4 Re: Updated Housing Element (case file no. GP-1999-1) Adopted Negative Declaration IS-1992-4 adequately addresses the updated, draft Housing Element. Technical changes to information in the Initial Study IS-1992-4 do not affect conclusions and are listed below: The planned production of 76-unit units for elderly households has been completed. Objectives for private market construction in National City have decreased. These are based SANDAG's adopted Regional Housing Needs Statement and are consistent with density reductions adopted in the City's 1996 General Plan Revision Program. As a result, the amount of new growth anticipated in the updated Housing Element is less than that encouraged in the 1992 Element, which was determined non -significant. In addition, 285 units new housing units were built in National City during 1991-1999, the period covered by the last housing element (P. 55, draft Housing Element). This, plus that to be encouraged in the updated draft Element, 378 units, totals 663, which is less than the 1,081 new units called for in the 1992 Element. • The amount of new development encouraged in the updated Housing Element, remains less than that permitted by the City's Combined General Plan Zoning Map. This is discussed in detail within the Element. Many of the Housing Element programs are continued from the 1992 Element. New programs would require environmental assessment on a case by case basis. These include the consideration of the use of eminent domain to acquire single-family homes for new housing projects, as well as consideration of projects that would convert commercial or industrial land to housing. ® Recycled Paper City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 92050- 4397 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST — DIRECTOR INITIAL STUDY Project plans & Hiv1mii zta1 Assessment Pon C7ese Pile II.S.-1992-4 received tin Reference Piles GP-199 j -4 Environmental Assessment Posun Determined Clete by Date Initial Study Cispleted by Steven G. Ray Date 2/14/92 ** * ***********#**# Address of Project Project Description Environmental Setting City-wide, City of National City Adoption of revised (updated) Rousing Element, pursuant to California Government Code requirements. The City of National City is developed for urban uses with few remaining vacant parcels. It is surrounded by urbanized areas to the north, south and east, and by San Diego Bay to the west. Navy and Port District lands utilize the City's bayfront. Most of the natural drainage courses through the City have been channelized for storm drainage control. ****** *************** *itttitit+Yt##**# *********######**** Conclusion: 1) X A Negative Declaration is proposed, since X (a) Mere is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect an the environment; or (b) The project may result in a significant environmental impact bit revisions in the plans by the applicant mitigate or avoid the effects where clearly no significant effects mould occur; or, 2) An EEIR is rewired since the project may result in a significant environmental impact. That the decisionmeking body consider the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the p''h4 { c review process and find on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 1•; 1N V IRONI'IliNTAL IMPACTS: No significant impacts are expected to result fro adoption of the updated Housing Element. ANALYSIS: The proposed Housing Element has been prepared consistent with adopted policies and. programs (in the City's Updated General Plan and draft Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy) fro rehabilitation of housing units and new construction, and assistance to households. Objectives, policies and programs have been designed to protect and enhance the existing residential neighborhoods for the City. They provide the most effective mans of protecting the existing affordable housing and upgrading its quality. New construction objectives consist of the encouragement of private market construction as well as planned production of 76 units for elderly households. Vacant residential land and recycling potential can accommodate growth objectives without any necessary changes to the Land Use Designations of the General Plan. The amount of new development referred to in the proposed Housing Element is not significant. It represents less growth than can be accommodated by the General Plan. Project specific impacts from new development will be addressed by the City's environmental review and project permit requirements. Since the new development will occur in an urbanized area provided adequate public services and utilities, no major expansion of public infrastructure is anticipated to serve the growth. Minor public improvements may be necessary and required by conditions of permit approvals. WILDLIFh HABITAT: The project will not have any potential adverse individual or cumulative effects wildlife resources as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM NOTICE The information you provide in this form will be used to determine whether or not an environmental impact report is needed. To avoid unnecessary project delays, the information you provide should be complete, accurate and unbiased. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY GENERAL INFORMATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT FILE NO.GP-1991-4 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) General Plan Amendment IS-1992-4 TYPE OF PERMIT REQUIRED (Housing Element Update) DATE 2/14/92 PERMIT APPLICANT City of National City PHONE NO. 336-4310 NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT City of National City. Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard. National City CA 91950 NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER N/A NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PERSON WHO PREPARED THE PLAN City of National City DATE OF PREPARATION Preliminary draft received 1/29/92 Zucker Systems for LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE JOB SITE City of National City, City limits SITE ADDRESS City wide FOR RESIDENTIAL: NO. OF DWELLING UNITS N/A FOR COMMERCIAL: TYPE OF BUILDING N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR INDUSTRIAL: TYPE OF BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER: TYPE OF BUILDING N/A N/A N/A N/A SQUARE FOOTAGE N/A CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY (General Instructions) The State of California requires cities to assess the environmental impact of all development projects before permits for such action are issued. The attached form will assist you in presenting the environmental effects of your project. The form consists of the. following sections. A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION You will be asked to give a general description of the project and its environmental' setting. B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT You will be asked to respond to a series of yes/no questions. A "yes" answer will mean the project could have significant environmental effects. These answers will be reviewed by the Environmental Impact Committee to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report will be required. C. STATEMENT OF NO SIGNIFICANT EIWIMMENTAL EFFECTS You should complete this section only if you answer "yes" to one or more of the questions in Section B, but still believe the project will have no significant environmental effects. D. ADDITIONAL DATA You may be asked to answer other questions and submit additional information to determine whether an EIR is required for the project. If required information is not submitted within four (4) months from receipt of written notification by the Planning Department, or an extended t riod of time acceptable to staff, the application and project shall be considered withdrawn. E. CERTIFICATION You will be asked to certify the truth and accuracy of your statements. INITIAL STUDY (continued) A. Background Information 1. Give a brief description of the proposed project. Include within this discussion the principal engineering proposals. See Attachment 1. 2. Describe the environmental setting, including distinguishing natural and man-made characteristics. The discussion should be of the site without (before) the project and include the imme- diate areas surrounding the site. See Attachment 2. INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space in Column A. Specific Questions 1. Does the project significantly change the present use of the project area? (The project area includes the im- mediate location of the project, as well as more remote areas that may be directly or indirectly affected by construction and/or operation of the project.) X X 2. Does the project alter any unique, natural or manmade features? X X Column A Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 3. Does the project affect the conser- vation of any natural or scenic re- sources or scarce natural resources? X X 4. Does the project alter the biological habitat of flora, fauna or endangered species? X X 5. Does the project alter or change ex- isting features of any ocean, beach, estuary, bay or tidelands? X X 6. Does the project alter the land form of topography in excess of 25 percent? X X 7. Will the project contribute to in- crease flooding? X X 8. Will the project increase the possi- bility of erosion or sedimentation? X X 9. Does the project involve any geologi- cal hazards? X X 10. Will the project increase the possi- bility of earth slippage? X X 11. Will the project contribute advers- ly to the quality of air? X X INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A i Column B 12. Will the project affect the use of existing or proposed recreational areas? 13. Will the project affect areas of his- toric, archaeological or aesthetic value? (The setting of such sites includes surrounding areas, the nature of which are important to the under- standing and enjoyment of the site itself.) Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No X i X 14. Will the project accelerate the dev- elopment of adjoining non -urban areas? (Examples include the introduction of facilities such as streets, roads, water mains or sewerage lines in such a manner as to facilitate development or intensification of the use of an area.) X X 15. Will the project tax the City's or other agency's ability to provide necessary facilities? X X 16. Will the project require any variance from existing environmental standards (air, water, noise)? X X 17. Will the project alter the character of existing communities? (Examples in- clude, but are not limited to: Changes in traffic patterns Effects on access within the com- munity to commercial establish- ments, schools, parks, etc. Introduction of activities not presently found within the community.) X X -. 18. Is the land use proposed by the pro- ject in opposition tb the City's ex- isting: plans, programs, and policies? X X INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No 'Yes Maybe No 19. Will the project require a change in zone, adopted community or general X plan? X 20. Does the project require any variation from existing codes and ordinances? X X 21. Will the project significantly change the average population density of the community? X X 22. Will the project alter the lifestyle of the community? X X 23. Will the project result in overcrowding, a lack of privacy for adjoining develop- ment within the community? X X 24. Will the project alter or eliminate views? X X 25. Will the project reduce solar access or opportunities for passive heating and cooling on the site or on nearby property or result in other effects on climate or micro -climate? X X 26. Will the project result in increased light or glare? X X 27. Will the project alter or limit access to public facilities or recreational resources? X X 28. Will the project affect existing transportation systems? X X 29. Will the project affect the existing utility networks? X X 30. Will the project affect the existing community facilities or city services? X X 31. Does the project involve the demolition. or removal of existing improvements? X X INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A I Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 32. Does the project alter or improve the employment base of the community? 33. Could the project significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conser- vation of a scarce natural resource? (Ex- amples include, but are not limited to: Developments which effectively pre- clude the extraction of the region's rock, sand, gravel, or other mineral resources. Uses which effectively preclude the multiple use of regional natural resources in scarce supply. Activities which tend to diminish the supply or availability of regional natural resources that are in scarce supply.) 34. Are any of the natural or manmade fea- tures in the project area unique, that is not found in other parts of the City, County, State, or nation? (Unique features include those areas, structures, biological phenomena, etc., that exhibit distinguish- ing characteristics not found in other areas, or, only in a small number of other areas. Such features can be either good or bad for human health, safety, comfort, or conveniences.) X ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (continued) C. STATEMENT OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions in Section E, but still think the project will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. Attach additional pages, if necessary. re. B.20: Possible programs include amendment of existing codes regarding density bonus provisions, permit processing, permit fees, group home regulations, variation of development standards and 2nd unit provisions. Such pro- grams need to be determined and separately evaluated for potential impacts. If needed, mitigation may be required when regulations are adopted or amended. re. B. 34: The project area includes the entire City which has unique features, i.e. marsh, bayfront, historic sites. However, the City's General Plan, zoning, sub- division, environmental and design review procedures adequately protect the resources. The proposed Housing Element will not affect the protection provided by the City's other policies and regulations. D. ADDITIONAL DATA 1. If there are any Army Cores of Engineers or other Governmental Agency public notices or permit numbers applicable to this project, cite them and give dates. 2. Estimate the amount of grading in cubic yards. 3. What are the maximum heights of man-made slopes, etc. E. CERTIFICATION I hereby acknowledge that the above Environmental Assessment Statement is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Date Date lyres Si Pe p t 7 Signed t°,2L- Person who completed this a ication ASSEMBLY BILL 3158 (Recently enacted legislation regarding California Department of Fish and Game Fees) The State recently enacted legislation (AB 3158, Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990, effective January 1, 1991) which requires that the Department of Fish & Game impose and collect filing fees as specified to defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife trust resources. These filing fees are intended to be paid at the time the lead agency .(City of National City) files the Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. ERO ECTS MIC REQUIRE PAYMENT OF FISH AND GAS FEES If your project has been identified as having a potential impact on fish and/or wildlife, the applicant must submit to the City of National City a negotiable check in the amount of $1,275.00 if this project includes a negative declaration or a check in the amount of $875.00 if this project includes an Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to Section 711.4 of State Fish and Game Cede. The purpose of the above State established fee is to defray the cost of managing and protecting fish and wildlife resources which may be impacted by development. The check made payable to the County Clerk of San Diego County is required to be submitted to the National City -Planning Department within five (5) days after the project has received•final approval and is no longer appealable. Failure to submit a negotiahle check will cause the project approval to become null and void since the environmental notice of determination can not be filed without payment of the above fee or authorized notice of exertion as provided in Section 711.4. NC) BUILDING PERMITS OR OMER ' aTil ^•E7PS WILL BE PISSED UNTIL PAY! tiT IS RECEIVED. Attachment #1 Background Information The project consists of a new, updated Housing Element mandated by California State law. The Housing Element was last adopted in 1985. The proposed Housing Element provides updated data relative to housing and demographic characteristics, which are necessary to describe the City's housing needs. In addition the Element provides commitment to existing programs and reaffirms and reinforces the goals and policies of the Updated General Plan adoptedin 1983. New programs may also be considered. The Housing Element addresses rehabilitation of existing units as well as new construction. A need for construction of 1,081 housing units over the next five years is identified by SANDAG and can be provided by development of vacant land and recycling potential within the context of the City's Land Use Element. Programs identified in the proposed Element include housing improvement programs and construction of 76 units for lower income, elderly households. The following programs are included in the proposed Element, and additional programs may be considered: $6 6 million allocated over the next 5 years for the following: a. home improvement loans up to $4,500 at 3% interest for low income home owners ($3 3 million from redevelopment tax increment funds) b. rental unit rehabilitation at 6% interest ($1 1 million from redevelopment tax increment funds and any other available program funds) c. acquisition, enlargement and rehabilitation of houses for very large, low-income families with Section 8 rental assistance ($1.1 million) d. acquisition, rehabilitation and resale of houses for lower and moderate income families for home ownership ($1.1 million) Street tree planting program, City-wide ($500,000 per year in eligible census tracts) (CDBG program) Continued enforcement of housing and building codes and the Property Conservation and Community Appearance Code and rental property management requirements Continuance of neighborhood public improvement programs funded by the City's Community Development Block Grant $500,000 assistance to Telacu for construction of a 76-unit Senior Citizens housing project Continuance of rental assistance to 1,090 lower income households at Granger apartments, InterCity Manor, National City Park and Plaza Manor Continuance of rental assistance to 300 elderly, low income households at Morgan Towers and Kimball Tower Continued rental assistance to an additional 172 elderly, 17 disabled and 769 family households New rental assistance (Section 8) to 250 additional households over the next 5 years Assistance for 50 households over the next 5 years to achieve homeownership New, possible, programs to help achieve new, affordable housing including the following: Adoption of density bonus provisions, amendment of development standards, amendment of permit processing and permit fees, amendment of group horn(' regulations and adoption of 2nd unit provisions Continued requirement for affirmative fair housing marketing plans for new subdivisions New programs to reduce energy costs by amendments to regulatory codes and ordinances Attachment #2 Background Information The City of National City is an urbanized area with developed residential, commercial, industrial, institutional and recreational uses. Natural open space areas in the City include the Paradise Marsh in the southwesterly portion of the City, and riparian areas along the Sweetwater River. The areas of natural, environmental importance are protected by the open space reserve designation of the City's General Plan. The City is located in the South Bay'tegion of San Diego County, 5 miles south of downtown San Diego, It is bordered by the City of San Diego to the north and east, the City of Chula Vista to the south, and San Diego Bay to the west. Direct access to the bay is limited by Navy and Port facilities. The City's socio-economic setting is characterized by lower household income as well as lower housing costs and a higher proportion of rental housing than characteristic of the region. The employment base in the City is predominantly in the following industries: government, including military (38%); retail (23%) and services (20%). The population of the City is relatively young with a larger family size than characteristic of the region. Socio-economic and housing characteristics of the City are well documented in the proposed Housing Element. The physical environmental setting is described in greater detail in the Technical Appendix of the Updated General Plan adopted in 1983. City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE JUNE 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 7-ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL CITY AWARDING CONTRACT TO ROEJACK ROOFING, INC. FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE ROOFING SYSTEM - KIMBALL SENIOR CENTER PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 00-3 PREPARED BY Michael Long DEPARTMENT Engineering EXPLANATION On June 8, 2000 5 bids were received and opened for the Replacement of the Roofing System - Kimball Senior Center Project, Specification No. 00-3. The project involves the complete removal and replacement of the Kimball Senior Center roofing system. The work includes the removal and replacement of the existing concrete tile roofing system including tiles, battens, flashing, underlayment, and related items. The Contractor will be allowed 30 working days to complete the project. Staff has reviewed the bid documents and found the lowest responsive bidder, Roejack Roofing, Inc. qualified to perform the work. See attached bid sheet. The total cost for the project is- estimated at $41,000. This amount includes the construction bid cost of $34,200 plus approximately 20% ($6,800.00) for contingencies. - Environmental Review X N/A FinancialStaternent The total project cost will be $41, 000 . 00 . Funding is available through Account 1-509-500-598-1140. N. 30 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolutiont) Accoun BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below I 1. Resolution. 2. Bid Opening Sheet 3. Bid Results Spreedsheet Resolution No. 2000-67 A-200 (9/80) 00-3 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-67 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AWARDING A CONTRACT TO ROEJACK ROOFING, INC. FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF THE ROOFING SYS 11.M FOR THE KIMBALL SENIOR CENTER PROJECT (Engineering Spec. No. 00-3) WHEREAS, the Engineering Department of the City of National City did, in open session on June 8, 2000, publicly open, examine and declare all sealed bids for the replacement of the roofing system for the Kimball Senior Center Project. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby awards the contract for the replacement of the roofing system for the Kimball Senior Center Project to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, to wit: ROEJACK ROOFING, INC. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City, California, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City, a contract between Roejack Roofing, Inc. and the City of National City for the replacement of the roofing system for the Kimball Senior Center Project. Said contact is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City' Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: /). 0,3 George H. Eiser, III City Attorney BID OPENING SPECIFICATION NUMBER: 00-3 PROJECT TITLE: REPLACE ROOFING SYSTEM KIMBALL SENIOR CENTER OPENING DATE: THURSDAY, JUNE 8, 2000 TIME: 3:00 P.M. ESTIMATE: $45,000 No. Bidder's Name Bid Amount Addenda Bid Security (page 14 or 11 (page 16) (page 14) (page 18 — check) (page 19 — bond) 1. . Roejack Roofing $34,200.00 Bond 2. C & I Roofing Inc. $36,056.00 Bond 3. RSI Inc. $37,640.00 Bond 4. A 1 All American Roofing, Inc. $44,549.00 Bond 5. Premier Roofing, Inc. $68,490.00 Bond 1. Roejack Roofing, Inc. 1107 Petree El Cajon, CA 92020 2. C & I Roofing, Inc. 9239 Olive Drive Spring Valley, CA 91977 3. RSI Roofing, Inc. 8176 Commercial Street La Mesa, CA 91942 4. A-1 All American Roofing 4901 Morena Blvd., #812 San Diego, CA 92127 5. Premier Roofing 9054 Olive Drive Spring Valley, CA 91977 June 8, 2000 Bid Results for: Replace Roofing System - Kimball Senior Center, Specification No. 00-3 No. 1 2 Item Reroofing Complete Clearing and Grubbing Qnty 1 Rank Unit LS Roejack Roofing Inc. C & I Roofing Inc. Unit Price 1 2 Amount Unit Price Amount RSI Inc. A-1 All American Roofing Premier Roofing Inc. Unit Price 3 4 Amount Unit Price Amount Unit Price $33,600.00 $33,600.00 $34,936.00 $34,936.00 $36,600.00 $36,600.00 $43,589.00 $43,589.00 $67,450.00 5 $67,450.00 $1,040.00 $68,490.00 $ 45,000.00 52.2% 16 LS $37.50 $600.00 $70.00 $1,120.00 $65.00 $1,040.00 $60.00 $960.00 Total $34,200.00 $36,056.00 $37,640.00 Engineer's Estimate $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 45,000.00 $44,549.00 $ 45,000.00 Percent Over/Under Estimate -24.0% -19.9% -16.4% $65.00 -1.0% Amount City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT adEETING DATE 6/20/00 AGENDA ITIEM NO. 3 ITEMTITLE RESOLUTION APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NUMBER ONE„ ACCEPTING THE WORK, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE EL TOYON BALLFIELD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 99-7 PREPARED BY MICHAEL LONG DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING EXPLANATION On January 11, 2000, by Resolution No. 2000-2, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $103,471.00 to Mentone Turf Supply for the El Toyon Ballfield Improvement Project, Spec. No. 99-7. On May 31, 2000 a final inspection was completed and the work was found to be in exception fdthe ewith 45 day maintenance danplans and d plant establishment period.th the Change Order No. 1 was written to reduce the original contract by $2,500. The project was initially bid including the 45 day maintenance and plant establishment period in line Item No.: 10, "Install Sod". Little League play began on Friday June 2, 2000. Due to the Contractors reluctance to maintain the field while in use, the Department of Parks and Recreation has agreed to. maintain the field for a credit of $2,500 from the original contract. Change Order Number One, therefore, reduces the unit price for "Install Sod" by $0.06 to $0.34 per square foot. This adjustment reduces the original contract by $2,500.00. See attached Change Order for a more detailed description. Environmental Review K N/A Financial Statement The final construction cost is $100, 971. 00. This amount is within the budget es imated for this project. F d'ng is available through P.O. No. 61274. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDAT N Adopt the resolutio p n he cha ge order, accepting the work, and authorizing the fili of a Notice of ompletion. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) RescIution No. 2000-68 1. Resolution 2. Contract Final Balance Spreadsheet 3. Notice of Completion 4. Change Order Number One A-200 (9/80) 2-99-7 RESOLUTION NO. 2000-68 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE WORK AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE EL TOYON BALLFIELD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (Engineering Spec. No. 99-7) BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City, California, as follows: It appearing to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department that all work required to be done by MENTONE TURF SUPPLY, Engineering Department Specification No. 99-7, for the El Toyon Ballfield Improvement Project has been completed, the City Council of National City hereby accepts said work and authorizes the filing of a Notice of Completion and orders that payment for said work be made in accordance with said contract. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney CONTRACT FINAL BALANCE El Toyon Ballfield Improvement Project Specification No. 99-7 DATE: 6/12/00 Final Inspection Date: 5/31/00 Completion Date: 5/31/00 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 A B Item Mobilization Clearing and Grubbing Unclassified Excavation Install Topsoil Install Infield Soil Install Pitcher's Mound Clay Install Homeplate, Bases and Pitcher's Rubber Install Irrigation System Soil Amending Install Sod Renovate Backstop Renovate Dugout Areas Unit LS LS CY CY CY CY LS LS SF SF LS LS Unit Price Bid $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 60.00 $ 30.55 $ 43.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 0.20 $ 0.40 $ 5,800.00 $ 9,800.00 Total Adjusted Unit Price $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 60.00 $ 30.55 $ 43.00 $ 100.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 0.20 $ 0.34 $ 5,800.00 $ 9,800.00 Bid Qty 1 100 180 252 10 1 1 45060 45060 1 1 Actual Qty 1 1 100 180 252 10 1 1 45060 - 45060 1 1 Original Contract Amount $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,499.00 $ 10,836.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 9,012.00 $ 18,024.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 9,800.00 Adjusted Contract Amount $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,499.00 $ 10,836.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 9,012.00 $ 15,524.00 $ 5,800.00 $ 9,800.00 $103,471.001 $100,971.00 Page 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: NAME: CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADDRESS: 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 NOTICE OF COMPLETION CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 3093 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN of the completion on May 31, 2000, of the El Toyon Ballfield Improvement Project, Specification No. 99-7 Work of improvement or portion of work of improvement under construction or alteration. on the premises EL TOYON PARt Street Address City State Zip Code The undersigned owns the following interest or estate in said property: Nature of the interest or estate of owner (mortgagor, lessee, etc.) Said work of improvement was performed on the property pursuant to a contract with MENTONE TURF SUPPLY . Name of Original Contractor The following work and material were supplied: General statement of kind of labor, services, equipment or materials The names and addresses of co -owners are: N/A Joint tentants, tenants in common, or other owners Dated: , 2000; Signature of Owner City of National City, 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 I, the undersigned, say: I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct. Executed on , 2000, at , California. Signature: GEORGE H. WATERS, MAYOR CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE: PROJECT: EL TOYON BALLFIELD IMPROVEMENTS, SPECIFICATION NO. 99-7 TO: MR. JAMES GRIFFEN MENTONE TURF SUPPLY P.O. BOX 592 MENTONE, CA 92359 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: This change order is written to delete the 45 day maintenance and plant establishment period from the contract. PAGE 1 OF 2 6/9/00 No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Item Mobilization Clearing and Grubbing Unclassified Excavation Install Topsoil Install Infield Soil Install Pitcher's Mound Clay Unit LS LS CY CY CY Unit Price Bid $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 . $ 60.00 $ 30.55 $ 43.00 Adjusted Unit Price $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 60.00 $ 30.55 $ 43.00 Bid Qty 1 1 100 180 252 Actual Qty 1 1 100 180 252 Contract Amount $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,499.00 $ 10,836.00 Adjusted Contract Amt. $ 8,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 5,499.00 $10,836.00 CY $ 100.00 $ 100.00 10 10 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 Install Homeplate, Bases and Pitcher's Rubber Install Irrigation System Soil Amending Install Sod LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 1 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 LS SF SF $ 15,500.00 $ 0.20 $ 0.40 $ 15,500.00 $ 0.20 $ 0.34 1 45060 1 45060 $ 15,500.00 $ 9,012.00 45060 45060 $ 18,024.00 $ 15,500.00 $ 9,012.00 $ 15,524.00 A B Renovate Backstop LS $ 5,800.00 $ 5,800.00 1 1 $ 5,800.00 $ 5,800.00 Renovate Dugout Areas (Total LS $ 9,800.00 $ 9,800.00 1 1 I $ 9,800.00 $103,471.00 $ 9,800.00 $100,971.00 DISCUSSION: This project was initially bid including the maintenance and plant establishment period in line item No. 10, "Install Sod". The contractor and the City have mutually agreed that the maintenance and plant establishment period will no longer be performed by the contractor and will become the responsibility of the City. It has been agreed that this 45 day period of maintenance is worth $2500 of the Install Sod line item. The Unit Price for Install Sod has been reduced by $0.06 to $0.34 per square foot of sod installed. This adjustment reduces the original contract by $2500. CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 PAGE 1 OF 2 CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT: As a result of this change order the contract price is adjusted as follows: 1. The contract price is reduced in the amount of $2,500 from the current contract price of $103,471.00 to a new contract price of $100,971.00. 2. The contract time is increased by 5 working days due to rain and wet conditions. The contract completion date was previously established as Friday, April 14, 2000 and has been extended to Friday, April 21, 2000. This change order shall be considered full compensation for furnishing and installing the materials, labor, tools and equipment, profit, overhead, and all incidentals for performing the work described above. Mentone Turf Supply will not be entitled,,to damages or additional payment for delays as described in the 1997 edition of Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Section 6-6.3, for performing the work as described above. Recommended for Approval by: Approved by: n S. yers, Cify Engineer City of National City Resolution Number e (43 ©p Da (I/6 l() Date Date City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF MOBILE DATA SYSTEM FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM MOTOROLA, INCORPORATED.j' REPA LIEUTENANT MIKE IGLESIAS DE�A r ENT POLICE DEPARTMENT EXPLANATION The Police Department recommends purchase of a turn -key integrated Mobile Data System from Motorola, Incorporated. To date a total of $239,860 has been approved for the project in Council Resolutions 96-155 and 97-132 and subsequently appropriated to the CIP. Background In May, 1999; the Police Department released a Request for Proposal for a Mobile Data System. Four vendors, Motorola, Inc.; Software Corporation of America (SCA), Public Safety Technologies, and Cerulean responded to the RFP by the June 25, 1999 deadline. A selection committee consisting of the City MIS Director, Bernard Yeo; Senior Police Dispatcher Marie Hernandez, and Lieutenant Mike Iglesias evaluated the proposals. Selection criteria included the ability to provide 3 basic functionalities which included, transmission of CAD data between field units and Dispatch, running records checks from mobile field units and transmission of automated field reports from the field, history of vendor, ability of vendor to perform as a prime contractor/integrator for the project and overaltprojeLrucist. Environmental Review xx N/A Financial Statement j $230,000 cost of Phase I of contract will be funded by $163,2 8 COPS MORE 96 funds from account #185-409-500-598-8009 and $66,722 in FY 97/98 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds from account#157-409-500-598-8009. Phase 2 Option and Phase 3 Option contin•ent upon Council appropriation of futur-e:_funding. Account IMo. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Resolution. BOARD f COM SION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS List Below ) - Copy of Contract Available in City Clerk's Office - Resolution Resolution No. 2000-69 A-200 (9/80) COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF MOBILE DATA SYSTEM FROM MOTOROLA, INC. PAGE 2 Upon initial evaluation of the proposals, the committee felt that SCA and Cerulean responses to the proposals were the most complete and best met the needs of the Police Department. SCA and Cerulean were invited to demonstrate their products and make them available for field testing. Demonstrations of the SCA and Cerulean products were conducted in November, 1999. In December, 1999; Software Corporation of America, (SCA) was bought out by Motorola, Incorporated. Motorola became the owner of all intellectual properties, contracts, proposals, software and other assets owned by SCA. Throughout December, 1999 and January, 2000, the National City Police Department conducted field testing of the Cerulean solution and the Motorola (previously SCA) solution. In January , 2000; the National City Police Department was notified by Cerulean, that although they were willing to sell their Mobile Data software to National City, they were not willing to serve as a prime contractor/integrator for the project. On February 22, 2000, the selection committee conducted a final evaluation of the proposals and selected Motorola as the best qualified for the following reasons. 1. Motorola was willing to serve as a prime contractor/integrator for the Project whereas it's major competitor did not. Given the small MIS staff of the City, the committee considered this an essential requirement for a vendor for this project. 2. The performance of the Motorola solution was superior to that of Cerulean during field testing. Reception at remote areas such as Las Colinas when doing female prisoner transport was superior with the Motorola solution. Error messages and screen lockup where received less frequently with the Motorola product than with Cerulean. 3. Neither Cerulean nor PST were responsive for requests to incorporate all costs, such as subcontractor costs for integrating with the Police Department's Tritech CAD, or integrating AFR were not included whereas, Motorola provided comprehensive costs for these functionalities. 4. Continued development and improvement has been conducted on the Motorola RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF MOBILE DATA SYSTEM FROM MOTOROLA, INC. PAGE 3 Mobile Data software over the last several years whereas there have been few improvements in the Cerulean software. 5. Motorola's software utilized a graphic user interface (GUI) format making it easier and cheaper to write interfaces than the Cerulean product.. 6. Motorola has an excellent history in performing work for the City of National City, having installed a voice 800 MHz Radio System in 1993 and performed an expansion of that system in 1999. 7. Motorola was the most financially stable of all the vendors. Contract negotiations with Motorola began March 1, 1999. A tentative agreement with Motorola on a contract was reached on June 12, 2000. The proposed Resolution would award a contract to Motorola to provide a turn -key fully integrated Mobile Data System. Under the terms of the proposed contract Motorola would deliver the Mobile Data System in the following manner. Phase 1-CAD MESSAGING AND SUN/CLETS QUERIES Motorola would deliver, install and integrate software and mounting hardware for 10 mobile clients, server hardware and software, interfaces with the CAD software to allow for messaging field units, necessary interfaces for SUN/CLETS/NCIC queries from field units, maintenance and CDPD service for a period of one year after the system goes live at a cost not to exceed $230,000. The system would utilize the Police Department's existing laptop computers. Funding available for Phase #1 of the project consists of a total of $239, 860, already allocated by Council. This includes $163,278 in COPS MORE 96 funds and $76,582 in FY 1997/98 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds. Phase 2 Option -SUBMISSION OF AFR REPORTS FROM FIELD Under the terms of the proposed agreement with Motorola, the City would have the option of purchasing the interface between the Mobile Data Computing software and Automated Field Reporting software that would allow officers to electronically transmit their reports from the field to the Police Department at a cost of $131,705 provided that the City exercised such option within one year of the execution of the proposed agreement. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF MOBILE DATA SYSTEM FROM THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM MOTOROLA, INCORPORATED. PAGE 4 Phase 3 Option -PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL MOBILE DATA UNITS Under the terms of the proposed agreement with Motorola, the City would have the option of adding additional mobile clients at a cost of $3,593 per unit provided that the City exercises this option within one year of execution of the Agreement. This would include the cost for software, modems, CDPD, and maintenance. The City has already received $178,801 in FY 2000/01 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds and will receive approximately $130,000, in FY 2000/01 Supplemental Law Enforcement. The Police Department intends to request allocation of all of these funds to the Mobile Data Computing project to fund the scope of work included in the Phase 2 and Phase 3 options. The Phase 2 and Phase 3 options were included as provisions in this contract for the following reasons. 1. The Police Department needs to obtain a contract with a vendor by June 30, 2000, to avoid losing the $163,278 in COPS MORE 96 funding. 2. The FY 2000/01 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services and FY 2000/01 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds to be utilized for Phase 2 and Phase 3 of the project will not available for allocation by Council until September, 2000. 3. Due to the software customization and integration and overall project continuity needed in this project, the same vendor who performs the work in Phase 1, Motorola, should be utilized for the scope of work in phase 2 and phase 3. Inclusion of the Phase 2 and Phase 3 options will allow all the work to performed by the same vendor and eliminate delays needed for bidding or additional contract negotiations for that scope of work. Under the proposed Resolution exercise of the Phase 2 and Phase 3 options of the contract would be contingent upon future Council allocation of the FY 2000/01 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant funds and FY 2000/01 Supplemental Law Enforcement Services funds needed to fund those options. The Police Department recommends approval of the Resolution awarding the contract for a Mobile Data System to Motorola, Incorporated. RESOLUTION NO. 2000— 69 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH MOTOROLA, INC. FOR THE PURCHASE OF A MOBILE DATA SYSTEM FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the National City Police Department recommends the purchase of a turn -key integrated Mobile Data System; and WHEREAS, Resolutions No. 96-155 and 97-132 approved a total of $239,860 for the project which were subsequently appropriated to the CIP; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that Motorola, Inc. is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the City, and is willing to perform such services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute an agreement with Motorola, Inc. for the purchase of a Mobil Data System for the Police Department. Said agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla - City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Es g ser, III City Attorney .00ga4nS George H. Waters - Mayor MEETING DATE 6/20/00 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATE ENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT RENEWAL FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S 800 MHZ COMMUNICATION SYSTEM. PREPARED BY EXPLANATION. SKIP DiCERCHIO CHIEF OF POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICE DEPARTMENT Bid #GS9293-2 for the installation and maintenance pf the Police Department's 800 MHZ system was awarded on 8-17-93, via Resolution #92-123. The award was for a one year contract, with three one — year renewal options. In 1997, due to the excellent service provided by U.S. Wireless and a rate reduction of 30%, the Police Department requested and was granted a two year contract renewal with U.S. Wireless by Council in Resolution 97-31. The current contract expires on June 30, 2000. The annual cost of the contract is $17, 859. The vendor, U.S. Wireless, has proposed a one year contract. The cost of the proposed contract is $17,992.68. This reflects a $12.00 a month increase due to the additional portable radios that were recently purchased. Due to the complexity of the contract and the excellent service provided by U.S. Wireless, the vendor; the affected Departments are in favor of a contract renewal. Council authorization is requested for a one (1) year renewal (to expire 6-20-2001), under existing terms and conditions. The value of the contract is $17,992.68 per year. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Cost of the contract has been included in the Police Department's FY 2000/2001 budget. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS t Listed ;Below Proposed Contract Resolution No, 2000-70 A-200 (Rev. 9/80) Resolution Authorizing a Contract Renewal for the Maintenance of the Police Department's 800 MHZ Communication System Page2 Per purchasing Ordinance No. 1480, section 12a (4), the bidding requirements may be waived when the City Council determines that due to special circumstances, it is in the City's best interest to enter into a contract without compliance with the bidding procedure. Given the excellent working relationship with the vendor and vendors and the excellent service the City has received, staff recommends that the bidding requirements be waived. Radiow Communications 9670 Waples Street San Diego, CA 92121 ph.858-452-6250 Fax: 858-450-6412 CUSTOMER NAME: CITY OF NAT'L CITY - POLICE DEPT. ATTN: ACCOUNTS PAYABLE BILLING ADDRESS: 1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD CITY: NAT'L CITY STATE: CA ZIP: 91950 CONTRACT START DATE: 07/01/2000 YES AUTO RENEWAL: NO SERVICE I '.EEMENT DATE 5/26/00 CUSTOMER #: NAT140 MOTGAOLA CUSTOMER/AGREEMENT: 9670-1986-60-111 CUSTOMER CONTACT: LT. IGLESIAS TELEPHONE #: 619-336-4508 FAX: 336-4454 EXPIRATION DATE: 6/30/01 PAGE 1 OF_2_ WHEN THIS AGREEMENT IS ACCEPTED BY RAOIDWAVE, THE EQUIPMENT ON THE CUSTOMER/AGREEMENT ORDER REFERENCED ABOVE VALL BE SERVICED BY RAOIOWAVE IN ACCORDANCE GIN THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS PRINTED ON ATTACHMENT. THIS AGREEMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE REPLACEMENT OF ANTENNAS. BATTERIES. OR SERVICE OF ANY TRANSMISSION LINES OR ANTENNAS. OTT 3 MODEL NUMBER/SERIAL NUMBER/DESCRIPTION *CONTROL CONSOLES HI TECH - CONTROL CONSOLES PLACE OF SERVICE CUSTOMER LOCATION X SVC CTR CRIVE-IN SVC CTR MAIL -IN X MONTHLY SVC AMOUNT SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: THIS CONTRACT INCLUDES PARTS, LABOR WITH THE EXCEPTION OF: ANTENNA, PER UNIT 35.00 105.00 EXTENDED 105.00 105.00 BATTERIES, CABLES, PROGRAMMING, PHYSICAL ABUSE AND WATER DAMAGE. AN ANNUAL PREVENTATIVE MAINTAINENCE INSPECTION IS INCLUDED, TO BE 4 1 *MSF5000 REPEATERS HI TECH - MSF5K X X 20.00 40.00 80.00 40.00 SCHEDULED BY NATL CITY POLICE DEPT. REPRESENTATIVE WITH RADIOWAVE. 1 1 'CONTROLLER (INCLS. SMT) HI TECH SYSTEM SUPPORT X X 92.50 95.00 92.50 95.00 * DENOTES 7/24 COVERAGE. HOURS OF SERVICE: 8:00 - 5:00 PM MONDAY - FRIDAY, EXCLUDING HOLIDAYS 1 *DESKTRAC BSE STATION X 12.50 12.50 50 SPECTRA C7 MOBILES X 5.50 275.00 3 SPECTRA MOTORCYCLE MOBILES X 6.00 18.00 SYSTEM #3129 49 SABER SI PORTABLES X 5.50 269.50 30 SPEAKER MICS X incl 0.00 CONTRACT INCLUDES PICK-UP & DELIVERY OF PORTABLES AT NATIONAL CITY PD 1 SPECTRA CONTROL STATION X 8.00 8.00 ON TUESDAY AND THURSDAYS, EXCEPT HOLIDAYS. 12 MT500 PORTABLES X 6.00 72.00 3 SABER PORTABLES W/DVP X 5.75 17.25 3 PX300 PORTABLES W/DVP X 5.75 17.25 2 MULTI UNIT CHARGERS X 1.00 2.00 1 DESKTRAC REPEATER (PLAZA BONITA) X 8.00 8.00 [ ] NEW [x]RENEWAL AGREEMENT AGREEMENT# 10 ASTRO DIGITAL SPECTRAS X 5.75 57.50 17 XTS3000 ASTRO PORTABLES (WARR) X 1.00 17.00 1 B1626B CII CEB X 80.00 80.00 1 BOARD SUPPORT X 105.00 105.00 PAYMENT CYCLE: TAX EXEMPT: Li ANNUALLY ( I YES, ATTACH EXEMPT (_1 SEMI-ANNUALLY CERTIFICATE L&J QUARTERLY (X J NO ( 1 MONTHLY (AFT) j� OTHER (SPECIFY IN SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS) TOTAL PER MONTH $1,476.50 AUTHORIZED CUSTOMER SIGNATURE/P.OY IS P.O. REQUIRED? ' 1 YES, ATTACH P.O. TITLE DATE -J NO TAXES 22.89 TOTAL $1,499.39 THE ABOVE SERVICE AMOUNT IS SUBJECT TO STATE & LOCAL TAXING JURISDICTIONS, TO BE VERIFIED BY U.S.WIRELESS SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (SIGNATURE) TELEPHONE # 858-452.6250 RICH LANKELIS SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE (PRINT NAME) RESOLUTION NO. 2000— 70 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A SERVICE AGREEMENT RENEWAL WITH U.S. WIRELESS FOR MAINTENANCE OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S 800 MHz COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WHEREAS, the Purchasing Agent of the City of National City did in open session on August 4, 1993, publicly open, examine and declare all sealed proposals or bids for installation and mainte- nance of the Police Department's 800 MHz system; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City awarded said contract to Motorola, pursuant to Resolution No. 93-123 on August 17, 1993; and WHEREAS, Motorola assigned the City's service agreement to U.S. Wireless, and U.S. Wireless has successfully maintained the system since January, 1996; and WHEREAS, the original service agreement was for a period of one year with options to renew for three additional one year periods, the last of which will expire June 30, 2000; and WHEREAS, the annual cost of the agreement renewal is $17,992.68 which reflects a $12 per month increase due to the additional portable radios that were recently purchased by the Police Department; and WHEREAS, due to the complexity of the service agreement and the excellent service provided by U.S. Wireless, the affected City Departments and the vendor are in favor of an additional renewal of the agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that special circumstances exist, and that it is in the City's best interest to waive the bidding requirements pursuant to the provisions of Section 2.60.220(D) of the National City Municipal Code. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City authorizes the Mayor to execute •a renewal of said service agreement with U.S. Wireless for an additional one (1) year period, to expire June 30, 2001, at a cost of $17,992.68 per year. Said service agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: George H. Water, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk George H. riser, III City Attorney_ City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Tom G. McCabe DEPARTMENT City Manager On June 9, 2000, the Finance Committee for the City of National City convened to consider the City's Preliminary Budget for Fiscal Year 2000-01 as presented by the City Manager. A Summary of Budget Changes reflecting the Finance Committee modifications and recommendations will be submitted for formal approval and adoption by the City Council. Environmental Review X _N/A Financial Statement Provides for a balanced budget for Fiscal Year 2000-01. STAFF RKOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A 1,PC:fir -IMENTS (Listed Below) L 1. Resolution 2. Summary of Preliminary Changes Account Na.. Resolution isio 2000-71 A.200 (Rev. R/E0) RESOLUTION NO. 2000— 71 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the preliminary budget for Fiscal Year 2000-01 is adopted as submitted by the City Manager, approved by the Summary of Budget Changes as modified and recommended by the Finance Committee, and hereby presented to the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby directed to prepare a final budget to be presented to the City Council for adoption which incorporates all budget modifications approved by the Finance Committee. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2000. ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla - City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: ,3 George H. iser, III,�Cii ry Attorney azir George H. Waters - Mayor PRELIMINARY BUDGET L,JNCIL APPROVED SUMMARY OF BUDGET CHANGES FISCAL YEAR 2000-01 Department Preliminary Budget Preliminary Budget Budget Changes Justification Manager Approved Council Approved (+) or (-) City Council 271,780 271,780 0 City Clerk 152,935 152,935 0 City Clerk -Election 10,000 10,000 0 City Manager 472,844 513,370 40,526 25,000Grant Consultant;15,526Class Revenue & Recovery 132,650 132,650 0 Adj. * Fiscal Services 79,548 79,548 0 Information Services 520,442 542,100 21,658 21,658Administrative Secretary Unemployement Insurance 38,318 38,318 0 Personnel Compensation 249,228 249,228 0 City Attorney 396,123 396,123 Planning 596,047 596,047 0 Personnel 98,627 98,627 0' General Services 258,219 258,219 0 Non -Departmental 394,797 395,277 480 480:sistpr City City Treasurer 26,288 26,598 310 60Mem & Subs;250Travel & Subs. Police _ 12,075,745 12,075,745 0 Fire Operations 4,093,809 4,109,159 15,350 15,350Sr. Office Asst. P/T to F/T Building & Safety 466,969 466,969 0 Management Information Sys. 130,057 130,057 0 Risk Management 1,752,354 1,752,354 0 Engineering 975,500 975,500 0 Public Works -Operation 0 0 0 Public Works -Streets 1,497,188 1,497,188 0 Public Works -Sewer 4,837,242 4,858,900 21,658 21,658Administrative Secretary Public Works -Refuse 147,221 147,221 0 Public Works-Fac. Maint. 1,575,935 1,575,935 0 Public Works-Eqmt.Maint. 1,460,126 1,460,126 0 Library 1,038,547 1,059,487 20,940 20,940Add'l Library hours Library Capital Outlay 39,950 39,950 0 Emergency Preparedness 15,000 15,000 0 Parks & Rec. Capital Outlay 1,670 1,670 0 Recreation 1,111,164 1,111,164 0 Info. Systems Maintenance 427,027 427,027 0 Office Equip. Depreciation 904,484 904,484 0 Park Maintenance 717,183 717,183 0 Local Transit 2,243,620 2,243,620 0 1Prmt• gt016/9/00 Preliminary Budg iuncil Approved Summary of 11.uget Changes Fiscal Year 2000-01 (Con't) C.I.P. 5,306,618 5,391,618 85,000 10,000EI Toyon Rest;75,000Soccer POST Fund 85,000 85,000 0 Field Police Reimb. Overtime 17,000 17,000 0 Productivity Improvement 15,000 15,000 0 Telecomm. Rev. Fund 186,227 186,227 0 Street Trees 0 13,124 13,124 13,124Gen. Fund part of Tree Maint. CDBG 175,059 175,059 0 GRAND TOTAL 44,993,541 45,212,587 219,046 *An additional $25,000 is expected from CDC. 2Prmbgt016/9/00 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT June 20, 2000 MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 / ITEM TITLE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY SETTING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE 24TH STREET NAME CHANGE TO JULY 10, 2000. PREPARED BY � N2 EPART ENT Kathleen Trees, Acting Director Building and Safety EXPLANATION On September 15, 1998 the City Council passed a resolution changing the name of 24th Street between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard to Mile of Cars Way and on September 14, 1999 the City Council passed a resolution changing the name of 24th Street between Interstate 5 and the bay to Bay Marina Drive. These changes were to become effective when the area codes changed in National City on July 10, 2000. The area code change has been delayed indefinitely, therefore, a resolution setting the effective date to July 10 is needed for clarification. Environmental Review x N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. •STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution setting the effective date for the street name change of 24th Street to Mile of Cars Way and Bay Marina Drive to July 10, 2000. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below } Resolution Resolution No. 2000-72 A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000-72 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY SETTING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE 24TH STREET NAME CHANGE TO JULY 10, 2000 WHEREAS, on July 21 and September 1, 1998, the City Council held noticed public hearings, at which oral and documentary evidence was received, to consider changing the name of 24th Street between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard to "Mile of Cars Way"; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 1998, the City Council passed Resolution No. 98-112 changing the name of 24th Street between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard to "Mile of Cars Way"; and WHEREAS, on September 14, 1999, the City Council held a noticed public hearing, at which oral and documentary evidence was received, to consider changing the name of 24th Street between Interstate 5 and the Bay to "Bay Marina Drive"; and WHEREAS, on `September 14, 1999, the City Council passed Resolution No. 99-136 changing the name of 24th Street between Interstate 5 and the Bay to "Bay Marina Drive"; and WHEREAS, these street name changes were to become effective when the area codes changed in National City on July 10, 2000; and WHEREAS, the area code change has been delayed indefinitely, and accordingly, a resolution setting the effective date to July is needed for clarification. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that changing the name of 24th Street between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard to "Mile of Cars Way" and 24th Street between Interstate 5 and the Bay to "Bay Marina Drive" shall be effective July 10, 2000. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20t day of June, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 /ITEM TITLE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2000. PREPARED Y Michael R. Dalla DEPARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION We are required by law to adopt regulations for candidates' Statements of Qualification prior to each Municipal Election. Environmental Review _XX N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Resolution No. 2 0 0 0- 7 3 A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000 —73 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2000 WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any local agency adopt regulations pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for a municipal election, including costs of the candidates' statements; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. GENERAL PROVISIONS. That pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at an election to be held in the City of National City, California on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, may prepare a candidate's statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. The statement may include the name, age and occupation of the candidate and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate's education and qualifications expressed by the candidate himself or herself. The statement shall not include party affiliation of the candidate, nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. The statement shall be filed in typewritten form in the Office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate's nomination papers are filed. The statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period. SECTION 2. FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY. a. Pursuant to state law, the candidates' statement must be translated and printed in Spanish. b. Pursuant to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended) the City is required to translate candidates' statements into the following languages in. addition to English: Spanish. c. The City Clerk shall have all candidates' statements translated into the language specified in (b) above. SECTION 3. PAYMENT. The candidate shall be required to pay for the cost of printing the candidate's statement in a foreign language. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidates' statements filed pursuant to this section, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance to the local agency his or her estimated pro-rata share as a condition of having his or her statement included in the voter's pamphlet. In the event the estimated payment is required, the estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending on the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the City Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro-rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final actual cost. In the event of underpayment, the City Clerk may require the candidate to pay the balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the City Clerk shall pro -rate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid within 30 days of the election. Resolution No. 2000 — 7 3 June 20, 2000 Page Two SECTION 4. ADDITIONAL MATERIALS. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the sample ballot package. SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate's representative with a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued. SECTION 6. All previous Resolutions establishing Council Policy on payment for candidates' statements are repealed. SECTION 7. This Resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 7, 2000, and shall then be repealed. SECTION 8. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20t day of June, 2000. George H. Waters Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 /ITEM TITLE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALLING\ AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2000, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AND AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISION OF THE LAWS OF THE STAlh OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES. PREPARED EY Michael R. Dalla DEPARTMENT City Clerk AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 EXPLANATION This Resolution calls and gives notice of the election pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to general law cities. Environmental Review _XX_ N/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( listed Below ) N/A Account No. Resolution No. 2000-74 A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 74 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2000 FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to General Law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 7, 2000, for the election of municipal officers; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of National City, California, on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing two (2) members of the City Council for a full term of four (4) years, one (1) City Clerk for a full term of four (4) years, and one (1) City Treasurer for a full term of four (4) years. SECTION 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law. SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is authorized to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election. SECTION 4. That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o'clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the Elections Code of the State of California. SECTION 5. That in all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. Resolution No. 2000 - 74 June 20, 2000 Page Two SECTION 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is hereby given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. SECTION 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions of the City. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: • r4P 4 AP--14: " George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 (-ITEM TITLE A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY —REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE SAME DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE. CityClerk PREPARED Y Michael R. Dalla DEPARTMENT EXPLANATION This is a routine election consolidation request made to the Board of Supervisors for each election. Environmental Review XX N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS (Liisted Below) Resolution No. 2000-75 N/A A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 7 5 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 7, 2000, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THAT DATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 10403 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 7, 2000, for the purpose of the election of two members of the City Council, one City Clerk, and one City Treasurer; and WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on the same date and that within the City the precincts, polling places and election, officers for the two elections be the same, and that the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Diego canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the statewide general election on Tuesday, November 7, 2000, for the purpose of the election of two members of the City Council, one City Clerk, and one City Treasurer. SECTION 2. That the Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all respects as if there were only one election, and only one form of ballot shall be used. SECTION 3. That the Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election. Resolution No. 2000 - 75 June 20, 2000 Page Two SECTION 4. That the City of National City recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any such costs. SECTION 5. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the Registrar of Voters of the County of San Diego, and enter it into the book of original Resolutions of the City. PASSED and ADOPTED this 20th day of June, 2000 George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: /4 /944. George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATE ENT MEETING DATE 06/20/00 AGENDA ITEM NO, 11 7' ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #50 PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE; EXPLANATION. Ratification of Warrant Register #50 per Government Section Code 37208. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECO ENDATION I recommend ratification of these warrants for jzotal of $192,999.99 BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TT CHMENTS (Listed Below) 1. Warrant Register #50 2. Workers' Comp Warrant Register dated 06/07/00 Resolution No. A-2C0 (Rev. 9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 1 ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Warren Eugene Wray Michael R. Dalla, CMCi City Clerk PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT EXPLANATION The claim of Warren Eugene Wray arises from an occurrence on November 25, 1999 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 23, 2000 . Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A X)uA Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL, AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO, 13 ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES:Darrow Keith Johnson il\ PREPARED BY PARTMENT Michael R. Dalla, CIvJCity Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Darrow Keith Johnson arises from an occurrence on November 25, 19c and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 23, 2000 . 9 Environmental Review __XXI/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Account No. Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 / ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Darlene Dent PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, Ca _P RTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Darlene Dent arises from an occurrence on November 25, 1999 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 23, 2000 . Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A XQUA Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Khallid Ngufu PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CluPARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Khallid Ngufu arises from an occurrence on November 25, 1999 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 23, 2000 . Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A XNb/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 ITEM TITLE PREPARED BY CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Jason McNeal Michael R. Dalla, CMJ ARTMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 16 City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Jason McNeal arises from an occurrence on November 25, 1999 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 23, 2000 . Environmental Review _V&A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 / ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Rozzell Jordan PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CM�EPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Rozzell Jordan arises from an occurrence on November 25, 1999 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 23, 2000 . Environmental Review __N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 18 r ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Terrence Lenon Ellis PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CMC1 DEPARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION - The claim of Terrence Lenon Ellis arises from an occurrence on January 23, 2000 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on May 17, 2000 . Environmental ReviewXX N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. A-200 (Rev. 9/801 MEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT June 20, 2000 (-ITEM TITLE AGENDA ITEM NO. 19 AN ORDINANCE OF 1'HE CITY COUNCIL OF THE Cl'1'Y OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 15.12 RELATING TO MOVED BUILDINGS PREPARED BY Kathleen Trees, Acting DireEre, /ARTMENT EXPLANATION See attached staff report. Building and Safety Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOM ENDATION Approve the Ordinance BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Advisory and Appeals Board recommends approval. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Staff Report Proposed Ordinance — Strike Out and Smooth Board of Appeals Resolution Citizen Petition A-200 {9/80) STAFF REPORT Background At the February 1, 2000 meeting of the City Council, Mr. Jim Perraga and Joaquin Castro requested that the City Council reconsider their ban on structures .that are moved into the city from outside of the city limits. This ban was passed years ago to halt the number of substandard structures being moved into the city. At the City Council's request the current code was reviewed. The code only allows structures to be moved from a site within the city limits to another site in the city. Applicants wishing to move these structures must apply for a permit and pay a fee. Before the structure can be moved to its new location the building department inspects the structure to determine that it is not substandard. After the inspection the City Council must find that moving the building will not have an adverse affect on the health, safety, welfare of morals of the community or neighborhood where the building is being moved. The moved structure must also comply with the zoning laws and not contribute to blight or deterioration of the new neighborhood. The City Council may also impose other regulations as it sees fit as described in Section 15.12.040. Discussion The proposed change in the Municipal Code would allow residential structures to be brought into the city from outside of the city limits. They would be subject to the same conditions that buildings being moved within the city limits are subject to. State law currently requires cities to permit residential manufactured homes to be moved into the city, however, the state law does allow the city to prohibit manufactured homes over ten years old from being brought into the city. By prohibiting the older manufactured homes, which may be in poor condition and by continuing to prohibit commercial coaches the only new structures that can be moved into the city would be newer manufactured homes and site built homes which are lifted off their existing foundation and placed on a new foundation at the new site. These site built homes are pre -inspected by the Building and Safety Department and cannot be in substandard condition before they are moved. They must also meet the City's zoning requirements and be approved by the City Council. These homes often cannot be distinguished from other site built homes after they are moved. The City's Advisory and Appeals Board has recommended approval of the ordinance change. Alternative Recommendations 1. Staff is recommending that the ordinance be adopted to allow only residential moved buildings into the city from outside the city limits and to limit the age of manufactured homes that are moved into the City. 2. Allow all types of buildings to be moved into the City. This is not recommended by staff since it allows commercial coaches to be moved into the city. The City has had problems with this type of structure in the past. If the City Council were to choose to do this, they may want to consider the additional requirement of a Conditional Use Permit. 3. Do not allow any buildings to be moved into the city. By not allowing residential moved buildings the City may pass up the chance to have a significant historical building relocated to the city. Moved residential buildings are also a less expensive alternative to site built homes. ORDINANCE NO. 2000 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 15.12 RELATING TO MOVED BUILDINGS BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of National City that Title 15 of the National City Municipal Code is amended as follows: Section 1. Sections: That Chapter.,15.12 is amended in its entirety to read as follows: CHAPTER 15.12 BUILDING MOVING 15.12.010 Findings and declaration. 15.12.020 Code adopted. 15.12.030 Building moving permit —Required. 15.12.040 Building moving —Application. 15.12.050 Fees. 15.12.060 Inspection. 15.12.070 Building moving permit —Compliance required. 15.12.080 Additional permit required. 15.12.090 Violations. Section 15.12.010 Findings and declaration. The City C.cunci?City Council specifically and expressly finds and declares that the nature and uniqueness of the city, its housing stock, environment, and rate of population growth necessitates and demands the moving of existing structures into or within the city be permitted and controlled. However-3-moving-of However, moving of commercial structures or a manufactured home if more than ten (10) years has elapsed between the date of manufacture of the manufactured home and the date of application for the issuance of a permit into the city from outside of the city limits is absolutely prohibited. Section 15.12.020 Code adopted. The City Con cilCity Council adopts this code for I the pur. f sMinfiix�rito th ci and regulation of the moving of structures through the city. Section 15.12.030 Building moving permit -Required. Prior to moving any structure from one location into or within the city limits +m '� +' +h' +h +; i .+s a permit for such moving shall be obtained from the b3aidira.'safety department Building and Safety Ilr.ra. uueat. Na permit shall be issued for any Commercial structure to be moecri into the or fbr any manufactured home for which more than ten (10) rears has elapsed since the date of its man LT facture. Section 15.12.040 Building moving —Application. Prior to moving any structure from one location into or within the city limits to-anotherlocat' ith' t 'ty li i+ �c3 xi vx 7 � o, an application for a permit for such moving shall be obtained from the building'safety department Building and Safety Department. Section 15.12.050 Fees. A fee as established in the National City ;Fee-sSchedule adopted by the city councilCity Council -shall accompany each application to move a structure from one location on a lot to a new location on the same lot, or from within or outside the city to a new location within the City. i3..1 fee uc cstabii .led i,t the lice schcdt. adopted b� the city CouncilCit ouncil shalt accompany each application to trtp,re a tArackiiie fh one kcatiun within the ear to a new, location within the city. C..^. fee as established in the fee schedule adopted by the city councilCity Council shall accompany each .appl.icat.i:n to ,lave a Ailictrre fit, eat eic tthe cat IH its u wwithin the city limits. Section 15.12.060 Inspection required. Upon receipt of an application under this chapter, the department of building and safety Buildina and Safety Department shall inspect the structure to be moved and make a report of the results of the inspection to the city councilCit ouncil. The department of building and „a:iety Building and Safety Department may require an applicant to provide a written certification by a qualified contractor that the structure to be moved is free from fungus, termites or similar infestations. The director of hBuilding and t+Safety Director will forward the application for a permit under this section together with his a written report to the city councilCity Council. A permit allowing the moving of a building, house or structure into she cit,r �i *, f- ne place within the limits of the en:, to another plcc; therein will be issued only on order of the city councilCity Council. The cite councilCity CO LLOC i I can order the issuance of a permit under this chapter as hereinafter provided. Section 15.12.070 Building moving permit —Compliance required. A. A permit to move a structure into the city limits or within the city, limits shall be granted only if the cite councilCity Council finds that the relocation of the structure will not have an adverse effect upon property values in the 'district to which the structure will be relocated. The GCouncil shall further find the relocation of the structure in question will not have an adverse effect on the health, safety, welfare or morals of the community and neighborhood in which the structure will be relocated. The aCouncil shall find that the relocation of the structure in question will not have an adverse effect on the zoning regulations and plans of the city. B. Prior to granting a permit to relocate a structure under this chapter, the city councilCity. Council shall determine that the proposed move will comply with applicable zoning laws, and that the structure to be relocated will comply with all the building codes, laws and regulations in force. The €C: ouncil shall further find that the proposed relocation of the structure will not contribute to blight or deterioration in the neighborhood to which the structure will be relocated. C. The city councilCity Council, in granting a permit under this chapter, may impose such additional conditions, rules and regulations as are reasonable necessary to protect the health, safety, welfare and morals of the city and in particular the neighborhood to which a structure will be relocated. 2000 Ordinance 2 Moved Buildings D. To ensure compliance with conditions, rules, regulations and laws relating to the relocation of a structure under this chapter, the city councilCity Council may require the I applicant to post a performance bond, adequate in amount, to guarantee his faithful performance of all laws, rules, regulations and conditions. E. As a condition to the granting of a permit under this chapter, the cit, council. it` Council may require the applicant to execute a covenant running with the land which will bind the land and its successive owners to the performance of conditions imposed by the cit cauncilCitv Council in granting a permit under this chapter. F. As a condition to granting a permit under this chapter, the city councilCiti Council may require the applicant to install private improvements on the building site to be occupied by the relocated structure which in the judgment of the eCouncil are reasonably required to preserve the health, safety, and welfare of the community and the neighborhood to which the structure will be relocated: For the purpose of determining required public improvements pursuant to Section 13.22.060, the cirector of bBuilding and sSafety Director shall determine the improvement valuation of each building to be relocated. Such improvement valuation shall be based upon the current adopted policy of the city councilCity Council for new buildings. G. As a further condition to the granting of a permit under this chapter, the city councilCit\' Council may require the applicant to make such aesthetic improvements and rehabilitations on the relocated structure as are necessary to preserve land values and property values in the neighborhood to which the structure is relocated. Section 15.12.080 Additional permit required. In addition to the permit required by this chapter, prior to moving a building and/or structure over or upon any public street, alley or way, a transportation permit shall be obtained from the 4City Engineer as set forth in Section 11.40.110 of this code. Section 15.12.090 Violations. Violations of any provisions of this code shall be punishable as a misdemeanor and shall carry the penalties as prescribed in Chapter 1.20 of the National City Municipal Code. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 2000. ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Waters, Mayor George H. Eiser, III City Attorney 2000 Ordinance 3 Moved Buildings RESOLUTION 2000-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE ADVISORY AND APPEALS BOARD OF THE CITY OF NATINAL CITY RECOMMENDING ADOPTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 15.12 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS, the Advisory and Appeals Board of the City of National City at its meeting of February 17, 2000, after proper notification, conducted a hearing to consider the recommended amendments to Chapter 15.12 of the National City Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the amendments are necessary to respond to the changing dynamics of the city; and WHEREAS, after review and discussion, the Board determined that the amendments submitted be approved and forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation for adoption by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Advisory and Appeals Board recommends approval of the code amendments as submitted, and that such amendments be adopted by the City Council. PASSED AND ADOPTED THE 17th day of February 2000. ATTEST: Kathjen Trees, A/Building & Safety Director APPROVES TO FORM: R. • o1p "= radec y, Senior Assistant 1 ity Attorney Petition to National City CouncilSits members & City of National City taff Petition by: Jim Perraga, field operations manager for Southern California Underground Contractors. Property Owner: 1626 Orange Ave., National City Joaquin Castro, CMF Environmental, Structural Movers. We appreciate the opportunity to present our petition, and thank you in advance for your careful consideration and expeditious response. Petition: to revise building code 15.12, so as to allow the relocating of structures in National City, having originated outside the city limits. History: though not archived in any of the recent ordinances it seems evident that in years past of number of structures moved into the city were substandard, and remain so for far too long before final inspection. Understandably after numerous violations and in response Ito community complaints the city saw it fit to prohibit the introduction of any buildings from outside the city limits, and to regulate more carefully relocations within the city. Argument & Justification for change: Currently the city allows the introduction of modular homes. These are pre -fabricated structures (see 15.12.015) that are "moved on" to city lots by semi trucks, not unlike mobile homes. According to real estate statistics 30% fewer homebuyers will choose a modular home over a conventionally built home. This automatically lowers the sales price of the modular home property, which in turn lowers surrounding property values. We believe that it is correct for the city to allow people to select a modular home, if they so choose too, as there personal residence so long as it adheres to code (15.12.0040). It would follow that a conventionally built house with a potentially higher improvement value should also be considered for relocation regardless of its origin address. After all, why should National City be obligated to consider a sub standard house just because its within city limits. And conversely, why should a superior house, that would beautify and enhance National City be denied consideration. Recommendation: Require applicant to undergo a conditional use process before granting a building permit, including: • Pre -move inspection • Surrounding neighbor notification • Landscaping • Performance bonds, etc. Cordially yours, Jim Parraga, SoCal. Underground (714)412-470 Joaquin Castro, CMF Enviro. (619)247-3009 ...,x,zgtiVkF5f:EVP , . , ,777 , ;FT ApatIg. zA4g. • 04' * . " , , ' ORDINANCE NO. 2000 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING TITLE 15 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING CHAPTER 15.12 RELATING TO MOVED BUILDINGS BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of National City that Title 15 of the National City Municipal Code is amended as follows: Section 1. That Chapter 15.12 is amended in its entirety to read as follows: CHAPTER 15.12 BUILDING MOVING Sections: 15.12.010 Findings and declaration; Prohibition. 15.12.020 Code adopted. 15.12.030 Building moving permit —Required. 15.12.040 Building moving Application. 15.12.050 Fees. 15.12.060 Inspection. 15.12.070 Building moving permit —Compliance required. 15.12.080 Additional permit required. 15.12.090 Violations. Section 15.12.010 Findings and declaration; Prohibition. The City Council specifically and expressly finds and declares that the nature and uniqueness of the city, its housing stock, environment, and rate of population growth necessitates and demands the moving of existing structures into or within the city be permitted and controlled. However, moving of commercial structures or a manufactured home, if more than ten (10) years has elapsed between the date of manufacture of the manufactured home and the date of application for the issuance of a permit into the city from outside of the city limits, is absolutely prohibited. Section 15.12.020 Code adopted. The City Council adopts this Code for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing the moving of structures into or within the city, and regulation of the moving of structures through the city. Section 15.12.030 Building moving permit —Required. Prior to moving any structure into or within the city limits a permit for such moving shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. No permit shall be issued for any commercial structure to be moved into the city, or for any manufactured home for which more than ten (10) years has elapsed since the date of its manufacture. Section 15.12.040 Building moving —Application. Prior to moving any structure into or within the city limits an application for a permit for such moving shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Department. Section 15.12.050 Fees. A fee as established in the National City Fee Schedule shall accompany each application to move a structure from one location on a lot to a new location on the same lot, or from within or outside the city to a new location within the city. Section 15.12.060 Inspection required. Upon receipt of an application under this Chapter, the Building and Safety Department shall inspect the structure to be moved and make a report of the results of the inspection to the City Council. The Building and Safety Depaituient may require an applicant to provide a written certification by a qualified contractor that the structure to be moved is free from fungus, termites or similar infestations. The Building and Safety Director will forward the application for a permit under this section together with a written report to the City Council. A permit allowing the moving of a building, house or structure will be issued only on order of the City Council. The City Council can order the issuance of a permit under this chapter as hereinafter provided. Section 15.12.070 Building moving permit —Compliance required. A. A permit to move'a structure into the city limits or within the city limits shall be granted only if the City Council finds that the relocation of the structure will not have an adverse effect upon property values in the district to which the structure will be relocated. The Council shall further find the relocation of the structure in question will not have an adverse effect on the health, safety, welfare or morals of the community and neighborhood in which the structure will be relocated. The Council shall find that the relocation of the structure in question will not have an adverse effect on the zoning regulations and plans of the City. B. Prior to granting a permit to relocate a structure under this chapter, the City Council shall determine that the proposed move will comply with applicable zoning laws, and that the structure to be relocated will comply with all the building codes, laws and regulations in force. The Council shall further find that the proposed relocation of the structure will not contribute to blight or deterioration in the neighborhood to which the structure will be relocated. C. The City Council, in granting a permit under this chapter, may impose such additional conditions, rules and regulations as are reasonable necessary to protect the health, safety, welfare and morals of the city and in particular the neighborhood to which a structure will be relocated. D. To ensure compliance with conditions, rules, regulations and laws relating to the relocation of a structure under this chapter, the City Council may require the applicant to post a performance bond, adequate in amount, to guarantee his faithful performance of all laws, rules, regulations and conditions. E. As a condition to the granting of a permit under this chapter, the City Council may require the applicant to execute a covenant running with the land which will bind the land and its successive owners to the performance of conditions imposed by the City Council in granting a permit under this chapter. F. As a condition to granting a permit under this chapter, the City Council may require the applicant to install private improvements on the building site to be occupied by the relocated structure which in the judgment of the Council are reasonably required to preserve the 2000 Ordinance Moved Buildings health, safety, and welfare of the community and the neighborhood to which the structure will be relocated. For the purpose of determining required public improvements pursuant to Section 13.22.060, the Building and Safety Director shall determine the improvement valuation of each building to be relocated. Such improvement valuation shall be based upon the current adopted policy of the City Council for new buildings. G. As a further condition to the granting of a permit under this chapter, the City Council may require the applicant to make such aesthetic improvements and rehabilitations on the relocated structure as are necessary to preserve land values and property values in the neighborhood to which the structure is relocated. Section 15.12.080 Additional permit required. In addition to the permit required by this Chapter, prior to moving a building and/or structure over or upon any public street, alley or way, a transportation permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer as set forth in Section 11.40.110 of this code. Section 15.12.090 Violations. Violations of any provisions of this code shall be punishable as a misdemeanor and shall carry the penalties as prescribed in Chapter 1.20 of the National City Municipal Code. PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 2000. ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H.lviser, III City Attorney 2000 Ordinance 3 George H. Waters, Mayor Moved Buildings EXPLANATION AEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 06/20/00 AGENDA ITEM NO. 20 ITEM TITLE FIRE STATION PHASE III REPORT PREPARED BY Walter Amedee,t2&DEPARTMENT Fire Management Analyst II On April 4, 2000, Council provided further direction to staff that included keeping Site Plan "A" (construct 24,105 square feet of new building on current site and adjoining properties) and Site Plan "C" (construct 18,739 square feet of new building, remodel 5,366 square feet of existing facility as non -essential office spaces, and adjoining properties) on the table, fine tune it including costs, funding and financing, and come back in 90 days with preliminary information. The attached Report describes the outcomes of Phase III of the Fire Station Project including several Staff recommendations, which are presented for City Council consideration. Environmental Review Financial Statement X N/A Expenditure of funds not requested at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Adopt Site Plan "A", "C" or Modified "C". 2. Direct Staff to process the Section 108 Loan Application by January 1, 2001. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approved By: Finance Director Account No. N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Staff Report. A-200 (9 99) STAFF REPORT PHASE III FIRE STATION SPACE NEEDS STUDY SITE PLAN EVALUATIONBUDGETARY ESTIMATES BACKGROUND: The Fire Station Study began on September 9, 1999, when the City Council authorized a study of Fire Department space needs and as a result a "Fire Depaitnient Space Needs Analysis", and "Site Plan Evaluation/Budgetary Estimates" were completed. On April 4, 2000, Council provided further direction to staff that included keeping Site Plans "A" (construct 24,105 square feet of new building on current site and adjoining properties) and "C" (construct 18,739 square feet of new building, remodel 5,366 square feet of existing facility as non -essential office spaces, and adjoining properties). Phase III of the Fire Station Study is to provide a revision of "Site Plan Evaluation/Budgetary Estimates" for Site Plan "C", which is to include utilizing all available space in the existing fire station building and Multicultural Center. Also a written overview and recommendations regarding phased construction, and seismic analysis including cost estimates to retrofit the existing Fire Station to essential building standards and Multi Cultural Center to meet current, but non essential building seismic standards. SITE EVALUATION, CONCEPT SITE PLANS: Site Plan "A" 16th St. & "D" Ave. (Does not utilize any of the existing buildings) See Attached Plans; Site Plan "A" Site Plan "C" 16th St. & "D" Ave. (Utilizes 5,366 square feet of existing fire station) See Attached Plans; Site Plan "C" Site Plan "C-1" 16th St. & "D" Ave. (Utilizes 100% of existing fire station & Multi Cultural Center) See Attached Plans; Site Plan "C-1" Modified Plan "C" 16th St. & "D" Ave. (Utilizes 10,800 square feet of existing fire station) See Attached Plans; Site Plan "C" ESTUVIATED COSTS: Estimated costs for current and future building space needs are noted in the "Estimated Site Plan Costs" matrix. (See Appendix "A") A total construction cost estimate that includes both current and future space needs for each site plan was prepared by Certified Construction Management, Inc. is summarized in the "Opinion of Probable Construction Cost". (See Appendix "B" for cost estimate summary) STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Sites are ranked in order of preference based on a quantitative ranking matrix. (See Appendix "C„) 1 Primary Site Plan Recommendation: Site Plan "A", Current site including properties to the West and 15`h Street to the North; construct a 24,105 square foot new building to meet current space needs and design plan to accommodate 5,315 square feet of planned or future space needs. Total Estimated Construction Cost $6,215,509. (See Appendix "D" for cost estimate detail) Second Site Plan Recommendation: Site Plan "C", Current site including properties to the West and 15`h Street to the North; utilize existing facility as non -essential office spaces, construct 18,739 square feet of new building to meet current space needs, remodel 5,366 square feet of existing buildings to meet Administrative needs and design plan to accommodate 5,315 square feet of planned or future space needs. Total Estimated Construction Cost $5,514,387. (See Appendix "E" for cost estimate detail) Third Site Plan Recommendation: Modified Site Plan "C", Current site including properties to the West and 15t Street to the North; construct 13,305 square feet of new building to meet current space needs, remodel 10,800 square feet of existing buildings to meet space needs and design plan to accommodate 5,315 square feet of planned or future space needs. Total Estimated Construction Cost S4,876,164. (See Appendix "A" for cost estimate detail) Fourth Site Plan (Not Recommended): Site Plan' "C-1 ", Current site including properties to the West and 15`h Street to the North; utilize one hundred (100%) percent of existing facility and Multi -Cultural Center, construct 7,700 square feet of new building to meet current space needs, remodel 18,300 square feet of existing building to meet Administrative needs and design plan to accommodate 5,515 square feet of planned or future space needs. Total Estimated Construction Cost $4,573.986. (See Appendix "F" for cost estimate detail) NOTE: Estimated Construction Costs do not include the costs for furniture, fixtures, equipment, testing and inspection, property purchase costs, A/E fees, and construction contingency. Estimates of these costs are identified in Appendix "A" — "Estimated Site Plan Costs" matrix. Staff does not recommend Site Plan "C-1" for the following reasons: > Even with seismic upgrading, existing facilities will not completely meet current UBC essential facility requirements. > Hidden costs and the "snowballing" effect in remodeling/upgrading facilities are an anticipated reality therefore reducing Site Plan "C-1" cost savings. > Only 20 of the required 22 firefighter parking stalls are provided. > New apparatus building must be completely structurally isolated from existing fire station with expensive expansion joint products. > Close proximity of new apparatus building to the existing Multi Cultural Center buildings will require expensive rated wall construction. > Having to stay within existing building footprints and configurations will limit the layouts of the new facility therefore reducing function/efficiency. > Travel distance from operations living quarters to apparatus bays is too long causing significant delays in emergency response and increased risk of injury to firefighters. > Operations public parking at 16`h Street and "D" Street is tight and in a "dangerous" corner location. > Three out of four apparatus bays will still be back -in bays off of 16t Street. > Administrative staff/public parking is inadequate (14 stalls and 1 handicap for the public and staff combined, whereas Site Plan "A" had 9 public and 20 administrative staff parking stalls). > Training area is greatly reduced due to firefighter parking. 2 Space in training area, especially around training tower, is so small it is useless. The training area would have to be converted into much needed parking causing training to be performed offsite. > Trash enclosure location is isolated from fire operations. Aesthetic look of all the buildings will be difficult, if not impossible, to be designed in one cohesive scheme. > Even after extensive remodeling, the existing facilities will not be a modern "state of the art" fire station/administrative facility. Staff also studied a fourth site plan, "C-2", which included the current site and 15th Street to the North, but excluded the Osborne Properties to the immediate West; utilized one hundred (100%) percent of existing facility and Multi -Cultural Center. Staff determined that the site plan "C-2" would not meet the Fire Department's current, planned or future space needs. Therefore, staff does not recommend this Site Plan. STRUCTURAL REPORT AND SEISMIC STUDY: Staff was directed on April 4, 2000, to further evaluate the existing Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center to determine feasibility and costs associated with retrofitting the facilities to meet seismic requirements. Dasse Design of Southern California Inc. completed a Structural Report and Seismic Study of the existing facilities. (See Appendix "G" for report) The Report was referred to the City Engineer and Building & Safety Director for review and opinion. FIRE STATION REMODELING: Staff also surveyed San Diego County Fire Departments to receive information about the costs, effectiveness, and opinions concerning remodeled fire stations. The City of Vista and Carlsbad Fire Depaitinents responded to the survey. The Vista Fire Department remodeled 2,500 square feet in 1997- 98. The cost per square foot was $150 for a total cost of $570,000. The Carlsbad Fire Depaituient remodeled three fire stations. In 1994, Station #2 required remodeling 2,600 square feet at $70 per square foot for a total cost of $200,000. In 1995, Station #1 required remodeling 4,000 square feet at $75 per square foot for a total cost of $300,000. In 1998, Station #3 required remodeling 2,000 square feet at $40 per square foot for less than $100,000. PHASED CONSTRUCTION: On April 4, 2000, Council also directed staff to study the possibility of utilizing the Multi -Cultural Center as a temporary housing facility during the phased construction of the Fire Station. Staff conducted an assessment of the facility and concluded that the Multi -Cultural Center would require many improvements in addition to not meeting basic operational requirements. (See Appendix "H" for report) On May 2, 2000, Council approved an agreement to obtain the professional services of Don Iler, AIA for the completion of Phase III of the Fire Station Study. Mr. Iler has also provided a short written overview and recommendations regarding phased construction for both Site Plan "A" and revised Site Plan "C-1". (See Appendix "I" for report) 3 As an alternative to utilizing the Multi Cultural Center as a temporary facility, staff has drafted a proposal for Council consideration that provides temporary facility recommendations and cost estimates during the 12-month construction period. (See Appendix "J" for proposal) FUNDING PLAN: CDBG Section 108 Loan: The CDBG Section 108 Loan will fund Site Plan "A" with costs of approximately $5,438,040 or 73% of the Project, which excludes future building space needs. The Section 108 Loan Application takes approximately 6-8 months to complete and process through the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). Upon approval of the Loan, the City will have a year to draw from the loan. The annual debt service on the Section 108 Loan would be approximately $467,518 over a 20-year loan period, which would be included in the City's Annual CDBG Program. (NOTE: The interest rate utilized for this calculation was 6%). Community Development Commission (CDC) staff have drafted a memorandum to the Fire Chief that discusses Project costs under HUD guidelines, describes Section 108 debt service costs and its impacts to the City's Consolidated Plan and other CDBG-funded projects, and the possible need to amend the City's five-year "General Plan". (See Appendix "K" for memorandum) California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (CIEDB) Loan: On May 16, 2000, Council authorized staff to submit a California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (CIEDB) Loan Preliminary Application for $2,000,000 or approximately 27% of Project costs, which excludes future building space needs. Staff submitted the CIEDB Loan Preliminary Application on May 24, 2000. We anticipate a decision from the CIEDB Board by June 30, 2000. PROJECTED TIMELINE FROM 6/20/00: FY 2000-01 1. CIEDB Loan Process completed (12/1/00) 2. Section 108 Loan Process completed (2/15/01) 3. Submit FY 02 CDBG Debit Service Request (2/15/01) 4. City Council Review / Approval and Select Architect (7/1/01) FY 2001-02 5. Design plans completed (1/1/02) 6. City Council approval - Design Plans (2/1/02) 7. City Council approval - Project Bid, Contract Award (5/1/02) 8. Construction period (5/1/02-5/1/03) FY 2002-03 9. Construction completed/Facility operational (6/1/03) 4 SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ➢ PRIMARY RECOMMENDATION = Site Plan "A" ➢ 1ST RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE = Site Plan "C" > 2ND RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE = Modified Site Plan "C" ➢ Direct staff to process the Section 108 Loan Application by January 1, 2001. 5 T2-A1NING IcIREA Q TRY U) GFtRAlloN t-T-ITRy START OF` 5 T SLOPE CWN HATcHED AREA I SECOND FL X OpERATiC)N5 LIVING QUARTER S'SICE BUILDING--/� fo EXISTING cURB LIIJt= A[3AttDovC-D oN 15-TI4 sr. FERmerpc2. SECURTIy (1STH 511ztei 5/NEAR PjUILDING ( }�ICI}JG Ty.RJLLI NG SE")"B.ACk— \7C SECURITY GATE 7— 3-- I ROLLING '"'SEcUR117 GATE III TRINII•(G u�) AI2EA KtIAIN!NG EMERG. WALL GEN. 5 STTRY (tRAINItNe TOWER,/ HDSE STORAGE \,frk STAIR 14801eGRtt4I41:) UP) FUELTANK 61.7 18 9 1lo 11 llz lls 1141IS I16 ,IIIIIIIIII RAMP IyP PUBLI PARIc 7i RDLLING SECURITY GAM" II I 12 13 TKAI'-)IN Q 0,,e/ ARIgks NEW DRAPING T— PIT-) 1 > FIREFI GN PARKING 7 19 WACL • REAR APRON • V �-rRy ACM)N. Cj1cE I c BAY�PPbF AttyfIN• BAY I AI 21loyrUBL Ic AkAs ACM IN I! AVMI IcL5 V V v pHF{cES FRONT APFc 21 22 FUTURE RESERYtII Ai RgTUs su1L�ING i !II a--r-- Ill 11 ADMI . AHt1UL. BNGII{E Ilk BAY V I(o STREET I Of BIM -PING 5ETBAck 2'70' 12 I3 4 1516 IIiii R U c IP PLARkING '+,-.FLAGPDLE NG D IN PERI Ertl 5 RITY FEN ING SHIFP)TIIej IZECSIVIING REfAI ING WALL Ati t ltll STAFF RAMP p uP RETAI} WALL ATNIN e-E11TRY ING UpUC NATIDDTAL crry VIR 5TIAT1014 striMY EXISTING H12E �5TATtc N MO BE DelvIOL)s14ED ! � W DM cHUNITY I Roots R-). , I V1 5 51DE BUILDING SETBAck rUTUR:E cor1MUNITY RI`( EOC * R-.i ETIGINE -DISFLAy UILDIIJG srrE ?LA I ,k!, ScAL.1°=4DI- olI 1)cl t> kR-At�clltr�[i coNcLvr cfRYIE`r( • IGTH ST' +uD' five SIT �ETId EXISTING Flee signor/ cct.ISTRUCT Ned 21 -2o sF FAclLliY EXISTING CURB LINE ON 15TN ST. 5 REAR 3UIL'IDING SETBAck FERIMETE1. ABANDONED SECURITY ( IS 1-I FENCING T?.. FUTJFE RESERVE' AFFARATU5 $uILDIN6 START G¢• uc a IDVN N 14ATcHED ARF SECOND Flop orERATIDN5 LIVING QUART Rs S�SIt gUl DING SET ACK IS c<l , I I I I I ICI 2 1 SD`PR l r�� -I BUIchING T sETBAck \ / [up PM5 FIREFIGHTER PARKING sDcliRl1 ( E0 Grzre REAR APRPN GEN. 0 0 AsCIcI ./ APQARATus / BY S?' cue BAY \ / i�TH srRr I 1 SEcuRIGTY S STORY CAT -0 TRAININGTar`1ER/ 1 TRAINING s NpsE sTGRAGE AREA 1 SNIPPING/ d \ (RECEIVING x fil 1 v 314 15 I6 7 IB 19 Ito III 12 I1314- .5HIL TRAa.. 15 WhLL 17 11 I9 Nc —•� TRY — ¢xtaryoD. 2 opEP. Q = Pusucf ofFI ABOVE GRDUNA �RETq%DING 'FUEL TATtk WALL -� -STAIR uP 1 I I I I I I i t I' I= 13 14 Is 1617 I i2+ .7_1Ij0 III 1121.13 114 115 116 li I11111 , DMP(INGAD111N. RAMP* EMAM PARKING. uti / IEDc RIK FKttr4T .I •— • -� AFRc.1 NC 1111111 Il I1B I9 20 21 22 23 FLAGPOLE i I� AWIIH. Remove 9.1BLI E (IeTING I g0I5 HOSE TGt(ER /,1 2J. ) F.W» �- ADMIN. ABCr/E q"PMIN. SUPpLRT spACez. — ADMIN. OFFICES Fun! ADMILI. OFFICES It 270' •LtT1.kE CCNMUNITY RM/FCC J ENGNE T15PLAY BLDG. PUBLIC/ ACMIN ENTRY Iz INWG WA L 5'5It€ $UILDING 5ETs/\ %IArnaKAL. CITY HEADQUARTER5 ST'A`CCoN S`YUDY EXISTING FIRE STATION Tn 13E FEf' DDEL_ED F ALL ADMIN. AREAS CDi\IC y t siere FLAK u c_," 1,[ORTt-! SGAt.E ° 1" _ 4p'- ou I)0N 'zt4ii-AFZ41`Ilc'r MAF,cN. zoo CorNCEPT PVERVIEW • IGTH sT. f'It? AYE. STrE UPGRA"P/REMEica. EX15fir1G FIRE STAmcN T=CR A•DM'I. • CCNl.StCT NEW 2Z)91D0 SF FACILITY sW IN GU•1G cuR11Y G EX IS 111 G CL1 ukE d14 isT14 PeRA ZsEck_ 1=tEt1c lle TYp. A9A1411:14ED iSTH Sr. APPAt2g1Us suIu n-iG./S4TIPPJ1JG R. C�Vfl ITA NING F itFIRE1GHIL-K PAR) I146 Et3TP.Y U TRASH rT1C( . EY15r Ncv E rA11JING WAll-1b Pal AUN sTA T or tie s-rper sLoPE coH i0 rRCF r 13LJ I LDING SEACK 0 N TKAINRNG AREA 55f�RY movesC• JND •— — — . EXISTING SR INiG (Fuel. TAW- TRAINING RIEMAiN. IOW SiA1RF�a f qt" f pip ur. NE BAB ,c a• )1 4 _ Pu — ACMIN 6 PAIzKING 1.4 DFFIC S FLAG ( roiRe AAMIN c'FfIcEs ADMIN • SfAcES ADMIN• - PUBLIC \ _ ARFRS cIDuRflt II 1 III11 ASS(>c. APP•`a REAR L.MW Appal,/ PATIO ji DRIVE „Jw.J Q 11 Icd.II t1 I III PtREFIGHTCR PARK-114G g — 1ipKAFT�cIs� NINGG 1_ 4-4 FIT TD REMAIN. V OYES 1a TANER i t-t / AsTc 2Nb Att,$ %LR • C s) Imx / AKBLIL�ENGINE RAY / BAY I BAY II P/c# INeeie��' t REScud Q '7_ PRDM" APRohl LIVING ♦� Ths WYr.o3M/ ITCHEN/ DINING TRAINING/ T•Oc PIRERs orb.„. vFFlcs 13 -14 15 16 11 18 1.6,T+1 STREET +27,, FLAGrute oFaR.Nc PUBLIC \\V PARWt4G V A� Off fl CtiS J\ PUBLIC 1l=4.Y kETA 141NG REM DJ NATIoWAL CITY FIRE ST TI oo4 si-riliDY't-talksSeNE Aft �y F sc;1St. = it/ = �/- c 71 I>E51•1 AReffrCC-Q' -67.11A Qmoo OiicWI' PVeRYC TW • 16711 z¢ "'DU AVM, srm • CoMPLeia -O 1`1ULTI- CULT1) L CEMER 9z A1:r11/4- • co(fpL PVY> q- EClsr. ( •r1•1 511TIcDN FDg ssIot4 • c Gf t,W JCT t\3ISN 19t'VflR) LJ s RAYS sTRUCN •C G2oos.F;)� ed Sile Plan Costs Site Plan "A" Site Plan "C" Mod. Plan "C" Site Plan "C-I" 648,000 Renovation Costs: lA Current Need Construction and Sq. Ft. "C")(10,800Mod. 'C") $ $ 321;JG(1 $ 648,000 $ $ 1B Fire Station Remodel Allowance (5,366 "A") (I7,239 "C") (11,805 Mod. "C") $ 3,616,800 $ 2,32,96(1 $ 1,648,000 1,24Q 000 IC New Fire Station Two Story (22,605 Bays $ $ $ $ 450,000 1 D New Fire Station One Story, Apparatus Center For Future Admin. Office $ - $ _ $ _ $ 140,400 lE Remodel Existing Large Cultural Retrofit (5,366 "'C") (10,800 Mod. "C") $ $ 69 758 $ 140 400 $ $ 140,400 1 I? Existing Fire Station Seismic Cultural Center Seismic Retrofit $ $ $ $ 262,500 $ 262,500 1G Existing Large Fire Story Training Tower $ 262,500 $ 262,500 2,883,400 111 New (5) Renovation Sub Total: $ 3,879,300 $ 3,412,458 $ 2,939,700 $ 11 Current Need Construction and 504,738 $ 794,015 $ 672,273 $ 672,273 $ 1,185,848 1J 1K Site Work Costs: Prorates: General Conditions (8%), Contingency (15%), Overhead, Profit & Bonds (12%) Total: 35% $ 1,542,194 $ 1,429,656 $ 1,264,191 $ 4,876,164 I $ $ 4,573,986 $ 6,215,509 I $ 5,514,387 I Construction Cost Sub Total 11, Current Need Estimated 615,000 1 M Other Costs; Furniture & Equipment ($100K), Testing & Inspection ($15K) $ 615,000 $ 615,000 $ 615,000 $ 440,458 1 N Land Purchase ($500K), Fixtures, Fees Construction Contingency (5%) Total: 13% $ 607,531 $: 531,015 $ 469,556 $ 1,055,458 10 A/E (8%), $ 1,222,531 $ 1,146,015 $ 1,084,556 $ 1P Other Costs Sub Total: I $ 5,960,720 I $ 5,629,444 1Q Total Costs (Current Need): $ 7,438,040 I $ 6,660,402 Debt SaHileai $ 312,030 1R Ciiiiiii01601114.1114,PlaWAnnanl ai ar'/6% Interest�� °& � 1' t ( ^ ,+ $ 467,518 $ 400,663 $ 340,510 $ 171,944 1ST ) Scctiiiii 08i i'a II , '.Alta ialleitintpro0v M 5 "; u rsr +j , i ; ' v r. w x ,r°naw a, .. , , a k , :3 a,e).t x ai ��r •.e 'i( $ 171,944 $ 171,944 $ 171,944 ,-,�'- '639;462 I $ 572;607 ($ ' 512,454 I $ 483,974 1Iz� exalr�nn.i���4rtll�lit (�ur•r+ellt'N�e�) }It,: 1 Renovations: 2A Future Building Spaces and Future Community and EOC Room ($284,375), Future R-I Engine Display Building ($68,750), Future Reserve & Future Shipping and Receiving Building ($36,500) $ 549,000 $ 549,000 $ 549,000 $ 549,000 28 Apparatus Building ($159,375), Area $ 85,500 $ 85,500 $ 85,500 $ - 2C Future Administration Office Cultural Center for Future Admin. Office $ $ $ _ $ 104,500 59,400 211) 2E Remodel Existing Small Existing Small Cultural Center Seismic Retrofit $ - $ _ $ _ $ Spaces Renovations Sub Total: $ 634,500 $ 634,500 $ 634,500 $ 712,900 2F Future Building and (8%), Contingency (15%), Overhead, Profit & Bonds (12%) Total: 35% $ 209,385 $ 222,075 $ 222,075 $ 249,515 92,677 2G Prorates: General Conditions Construction Contingency (5%) Total: 13% $ 82,485 $ 82,485 $ 82,485 $ 211 Other Costs: A/E Fees (8%), $ 926,370 $ 939,060 $ 939,060 $ 1,055,092 21 Total Costs (Future Need): 6,684,536 Total Project Costs (Current & Future Needs): $ 8,364,410 1 $ 7,599,462 L$ 6,899,780 $ $ 402,738 2.1 2K Current &'Future Need Tunding Plan Annual Debt Servicei $547,159 $ 481,395 $ 421,243 2I; Sectioill.108 ;tiait(20Y�ar/6%Interest ,)f F $ 171,944 $ 171,944 $ 171,944 $ 171,944 V CINI ��iiii gOlYar/O Itl{ergst)i�K ,, , ( "� 1 ° I $ 593,187 I $ 574,682 ($ 719,103 ($ 653,339 2N T9ti1,4ant%aliiiliettt'( OMt r iii iiil esd), .. , Certified Construction Management Inc. NATIONAL CITY HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION STUDY PHASE III NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST JUNE 07, 2000 PREPARED FOR: DON ILER, ARCHITECT LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY CERTIFIED CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. MISSION VIEJO, CALIFORNIA 22542 Canaveras - Mi:,sion Viejo, CA 92691 Ph: 949-707-5210 Fax: 949-707-5215 Appendix B-1 E0 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: GRAND SUMMARY JOB NO: 00-019-5 ESTIMATOR: RRH JUNE 7, 2000 ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT COST COST GRAND SUMMARY 1.00 CONCEPT - A 2.00 CONCEPT-C 3.00 CONCEPT - C-1 81,000 SF 81,000 SF 81,000 SF 87.15 7,059,394 77.49 6,276,788 68.35 5,536,401 Appendix B-2 22542 Canaveras — Mission Vieio. CA 92691 Ph: 714-707-5210 Fax: 714-707-5215 Page 1 of 1 Current Site (No Use of old Structure) = "A" Current Site (Use 5,000 Sq. Ft of Existing Structure) = "C" Current Site (Uses Existing Structures) = "C-1" RANKING VALUES 1, 2, or 3 BEST OPTION = 1, 2nd OPTION = 2, WORST OPTION = 3 SITE PLANS CONSIDERATIONS A CJ C-1 Location: Which best supports future expansion options? 1 2 3 Operational Impacts: Which impacts operations the most during construction? Which best meets operational requirements? Which has the most drive through bays? 3: 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 Public Access: Which has the most parking? 1 2 3 Which has the most impact on traffic? Building Maintenance: Which has the most building maintenance costs? 3:::: :1: Layout: Which is the best design layout? Which has the most training space? Which best displays R-1? Which is the best design layout for the training tower? 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 Costs: Which costs the most? 3: Which provides the best use of the existing building? Which provides the best use of the Multi -Cultural Center? Which has the most seismic retrofit costs? 3 3 2 3 c; 1 1 Which has the most remodeling costs? 3: Which provides the best use of the existing pumper test pit? 3 1 1 TOTALS 25 33 43 ......................................................................................... Reverse:5co�e=-rev�rseafieadoie for:each:oftiieaFiaded:arisweds;i;e:::1:=3:pF 3='t>::::>:::::::: Appendix C i2 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT 'A' NEW SI 1E JOB NO: 00-019-1 ESTIMATOR: RRH, LDH MARCH 3, 2000 ITEM NO. DESOR1p?tON.. QUANTITY UNIT COST:'' OOST ESTIMATE SUMMARY - A 1.20 Site Work 2.20 New Buildings 81,000 SF 9.80 794,015 81,000 SF 55.73 4,513,800 SUBTOTAL 81,000 SF 65.53 5,307,815 12.00 PRORATES 81,000 SF 21.62 1,751,579 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST 81,000 SF NOTE: Estimate Excludes: Furniture, Fixtures and Equipment Testing and Inspection Land and Purchase Cost NE Fees Construction Contingency 87.15 7,059,394 Appendix D-1 22542 Canaveras - Mission Vieio, CA 92691 Ph: 714-707-5210 Fax: 714-707-5215 Page 1 of 3 15 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUA.R 1'ERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLtI-NT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT 'A' NEW SITE JOB NO: 00-019-1 ESTIMATOR: RRH, LDH MARCH 3, 2000 ITEM NO> ; DESCRtRTION €INtT :. Geog . TOTAL::.. QUANTITY. UNIT COST#". DrfPf:: _CE)ST•i Concept 'A' 1.200 Site Work 1.201 Demolish Culture Center 3,000 SF 3.00 0.00 9,000 1.202 Demolish Existing Residence 8,150 SF 3.00 0.00 24,450 1.203 Demolish Existing Fire Station 10,769 SF 3.00 0.00 32,307 1.204 Clear and Grade Site Area 81,000 SF 1.00 0.00 81,000 1.205 Training Area Concrete Paving 12,685 SF 4.75 0.00 60,254 1.206 Install New CMU Block Retaining Wall 2,920 SF 30.00 0.00 87,600 1.207 Public/Administration Entry Ramp 500 SF 6.00 0.00 3,000 1.208 Operations Entry Ramp 500 SF 6.00 0.00 3,000 1.209 Training, Administration and Public Entry Area 4 EA 1,500.00 0.00 6,000 1.210 Rolling Security Gate 3 EA 2,500.00 0.00 7,500 1.211 Concrete Stairs to Training Tower 1 LS 4,000.00 0.00 4,000 1.212 New Wrought Iron Perimeter Security Fence & Gate 450 LF 30.00 0.00 13,500 1.213 New Screen Wall 105 LF 110.00 0.00 11,550 1.214 New Trash Enclosure 1 EA 4,500.00 0.00 4,500 1.215 Administration, Staff and Public Asphalt Parking Lot, 2" on 6" Base 10,800 SF 2.25 0.00 24,300 1.216 Firefighters Asphalt Parking Lot, 3" on 8" Base 11,325 SF 2.80 0.00 31,710 1.217 Parking Lot Lighting 11 EA 3,500.00 0.00 38,500 1.218 Public Entry Concrete Sidewalk, Broom Finish 2,450 SF 2.25 0.00 5,513 1.219 Aluminum Flag Pole and Base 35 ft. 1 EA 3,500.00 0.00 3,500 1.220 Emergency Generator 400 KW, ATS, Feeder Conduit and Wire 1 EA 150,000.00 0.00 150,000 1.221 Above Ground Fuel Tank 500 Gallon, Pad, Pump and Piping 1 EA 6,000.00 0.00 6,000 1.222 New Drafting Pit 1 LS 75,000.00 0.00 75,000 1.223 Apparatus Bay Concrete Apron, Front and Rear 5,775 SF 4.75 0.00 27,431 1.224 Concrete Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter 880 LF 15.00 0.00 13,200 1.225 Concrete Curbs 1,600 LF 7.00 0.00 11,200 1.226 Landscape Allowance 1 LS 10,000.00 0.00 10,000 1.227 Site Utilities Allowance 1 LS 50,000.00 0.00 50,000 Subtotal Section 1.2 Site Work 794,015 Appendix D-2 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Ph: 714-707-5210 Fax: 714-707-5215 Page 2 of 3 i4 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT 'A' NEW SITE JOB NO: 00-019-1 ESTIMATOR: RRH, LDH MARCH 3, 2000 ITEM DESCRIPTION -QUANTITY UNIT UNIT Geag'' COST,-)."DifFt TOTAL COST Concept 'A' 2.200 New Buildings 2.201 New Fire Station Two Story 2.202 Future Community and EOC Room 2.203 Future R-1 Engine Display Building 2.204 Future Reserve Apparatus Building 2.205 New Five (5j Story Training Tower 2.206 Future Shipping and Receiving Building 2.207 Future Administration Office Area Subtotal Section 2.20 New Building 22,605 SF 1,625 SF 550 SF 1,875 SF 1,500 SF 365 SF 900 SF 160.00 0.00 3,616,800 175.00 0.00 284,375 125.00 0.00 68,750 85.00 0.00 159,375 175.00 0.00 262,500 100.00 0.00 36,500 95.00 0.00 85,500 4,513,800 PRORATES General conditions 6.00% 318,469 Contingency 15.00% 796,172 Overhead, Profit & Bonds 12.00% 636,938 Subtotal 1,751,579 Appendix D-3 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo CA 92691 Ph: 714-707-5210 Fax: 714-707-5215 Page 3 of 3 i5 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY ROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLfl NT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT 'C' RENOVATION JOB NO: 00-019-3 ESTIMATOR: RRH, LDH MARCH 3, 2000, NO DESCRCPTIQN. UNIT. TOTAL QUANTITY UN1T COST . COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY- C 1.20 Site Work 2.20 New Buildings and Renovation of Existing Fire Station 81,000 SF 8.30 672.273 81,000 SF 49.10 3,97,200 SUBTOTAL 81,000 SF 57.40 4,649,473 12.00 PRORATES 81,000 SF 20.09 1,627,315 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST 81,000 SF NOTE: Estimate Excludes: Fixture, Furniture and Equipment Testing and Inspection Land Purchase Cost NE Fees Construction Contingency 77.49 6,276,788 Appendix E-1 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo CA 92691 Ph: 714-707-5210 Fax: 714-707-5215 Page 1 of 3 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARI'ERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: DON ILER - ARCHI IECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT 'C' RENOVATION JOB NO: 00-019-3 ESTIMATOR: RRH, LDH MARCH 3, 2000, UNIT Geog a TOTAL QUANTITY t7NtT COST DM€t COST 1.200 1.201 1.202 1.203 1.204 1.205 1.206 1.207 1.208 1.209 1.210 1.211 1.212 1.213 Concept 'C' Site Work Demolish Culture Center Demolish Existing Residence Clear and Grade Site Area Training Area Concrete Paving Install New CMU Block Retaining Wall Public/Administration Entry Ramp Operations Entry Ramp Training Entry Area Rolling Security Gate Concrete Stairs to Training Tower New Wrought Iron Fence & Gate New Screen Wall and Gate New Trash Enclosure 1.214 Administration and Public Asphalt Parking Lot, 2" on 6" Base 1.215 Fire Fighter Asphalt Parking Lot, 3" on 8" Base 1.216 Parking Lot Lighting 1.217 Public Entry Concrete Courtyard and Sidewalk, Broom Finish 1.218 Aluminum Flag Pole and Base 35 ft. 1.219 Emergency Generator, 400 KW ATS and Feeder Conduit and Wire 1.220 Above Ground Fuel Tank 500 Gallon Pad, Pump and Piping 1.221 Apparatus Bay Concrete Apron, Front and Rear 1.222 Concrete Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter 1.223 Concrete Curb 1.224 Landscape Allowance 1.225 Site Utility Allowance Subtotal Section 1.2 Site Work 3,000 SF 3.00 0.00 9,000 8,150 SF 3.00 0.00 24,450 81,000 SF 1.00 0.00 81,000 12,150 SF 4.75 0.00 57,713 2,860 SF 30.00 0.00 85.800 500 SF 5.50 0.00 2.750 500 SF 5.50 0.00 2,750 1 EA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500 2 EA 2,500.00 0.00 5,000 1 LS 3,000.00 0.00 3,000 260 LF 30.00 0.00 7,800 105 LF 115.00 0.00 12,075 1 EA 6,800.00 0.00 6,800 13,200 SF 2.25 0.00 29.700 14,700 SF 2.80 0.00 41,160 11 EA 3,500.00 0.00 38,500 2,850 SF 2.25 0.00 6,413 1 EA 3,500.00 0.00 3.500 1 EA 150,000.00 0.00 150.000 1 EA 6,000.00 0.00 6.000 4,350 SF 4.75 0.00 20,663 800 LF 15.00 0.00 12,000 2,100 LF 7.00 0.00 14,700 1 LS 10,000.00 0.00 10,000 1 LS 40,000.00 0.00 40,000 672,273 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo, CA 92691 Ph: 714-707-5210 Fax: 714-707-5215 Appendix E-2 Page 2 of 3 f1 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: DON ILER — ARCHII"ECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT 'C' RENOVATION JOB NO: 00-019-3 ESTIMATOR: RRH, LDH MARCH 3, 2000, ITEM::: NO DESCRIPTION €UNIT . .;Geog DOTAL QUANTfTY UNIT CAST Diffl COST Concept 'C' 2.200 New Buildings and Renovation of Existing Fire Station 2.201 Existing Fire Station Remodel Allowance 2.202 New Fire Station Two Story 2.203 Future Community and EOC Room 2.204 Future R-1 Engine Display Building 2.205 Future Reserve Apparatus Building 2.206 New Five (5) Story Training Tower 2.207 Future Shipping & Receiving Building 2.208 Future Administration Office Subtotal Section 2.20 New Building and Renovation 5,366 SF 60.00 0.00 321,960 17,239 SF 160.00 0.00 2,758,240 1,625 SF 175.00 0.00 284,375 550 SF 125.00 0.00 68,750 1,875 SF 85.00 0.00 159,375 1,500 SF 175.00 0.00 262,500 365 SF 100.00 0.00 36,500 900 SF 95.00 0.00 85,500 3,977,200 PRORATES General conditions 8.00% 371,958 Contingency 15.00% 697,421 Overhead, Profit & Bonds 12.00% 557,937 Subtotal 1,627,315 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo CA 92691 Ph: 714-707-5210 Fax: 714-707-5215 Appendix E-3 Page 3 of 3 lc? Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY 'ROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT 'C-1' RENOVATION JOB NO: 00-019-5 ESTIMATOR: RRH DUNE 7, 2000, TOTAL ,,,, QUANTITY: COST: COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY- C-1 1.20 Site Work 2.20 New Buildings, Renovation of Existing Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center 2.30 Structural Seismic Retrofit As Per DASSE Structural Engineers Report 81,000 81,000 81,000 SF SF SF 6.23 40.17 4.23 504,738 3,254,000 342,300 SUBTOTAL 12.00 PRORATES 81,000 SF 50.63 4,101,038 81,000 SF 17.72 1,435,363 TOTAL ESTIMATED COST NOTE: Estimate Excludes: Fixture, Furniture and Equipment Testing and Inspection Land Purchase Cost NE Fees Construction Contingency 81,000 SF 68.35 5,536,401 Appendix F-1 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo CA 9269 1 Ph: 9494-707-5210 Fax: 949-707-5215 Page 1 of 3 1q Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLIENT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT'C-1' RENOVATION ITEM NfY_: 1.200 Site Work 1.201 Demolish Existing Residence 1.202 Clear and Grade Site Area, Less Cultural Center Buildings 1.203 Training Area Concrete Paving 1.204 Repair and Repaint Existing CMU Block Retaining Wall Allowance 1.205 Public/Administration Entry Ramp 1.206 Operations Entry Ramp 1.207 Training Entry Area 1.208 Rolling Security Gate 1.209 Concrete Stairs to Training Tower 1.210 New Wrought Iron Fence & Gate 1.211 New Trash Enclosure 1.212 Demo Existing Administration and Public Parking Lot And Regrade 1.213 Repave Administration and Public Asphalt Parking Lot, 2" on 6" Base 1.214 Restrip Administration and Public Asphalt Parking Lot, 2'.xi 6" Base 1.215 Fire Fighter Asphalt Parking Lot, 3" on 8" Base 1.216 Parking Lot Lighting 1.217 Public Entry Concrete Courtyard and Sidewalk, Broom Finish 1.218 Aluminum Flag Pole and Base 35 ft. 1.219 Emergency Generator, 200 KW, ATS and Feeder Conduit and Wire 1.220 Above Ground Fuel Tank 500 Gallon Pad, Pump and Piping 1.221 Apparatus Bay Concrete Apron, Front and Rear 1.222 Concrete Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter 1.223 Concrete Curb 1.224 Landscape Allowance 1.225 Site Utility Allowance DESCRtPTIOEI' Concept 'C-1' Subtotal Section 1.2 Site Work JOB NO: 00-019-5 ESTIMATOR: RRH JUNE 7, 2000, QUANTITY :UNIT U• NIT: COST Geog ';;:TOTAL Diffl COST 8,150 SF 3.00 0.00 24,450 72,400 SF 1.00 0.00 72,400 11,150 SF 4.75 0.00 52,963 2,860 SF 5.00 0.00 14,300 500 SF 5.50 0.00 2,750 500 SF 5.50 0.00 2,750 1 EA 1,500.00 0.00 1,500 2 EA 2,500.00 0.00 5,000 1 LS 3,000.00 0.00 3,000 260 LF 30.00 0.00 7,800 1 EA 6,800.00 0.00 6,800 5,025 SF 1.00 0.00 5,025 5,025 SF 2.25 0.00 11,306 5,025 SF 0.35 0.00 1,759 14,700 SF 2.80 0.00 41,160 11 EA 3,500.00 0.00 38,500 2,850 SF 2.25 0.rdi 6,413 1 EA 3,500.00 0.00 3,500 1 EA 100,000.00 0.00 100,000 1 EA 6,000.00 0.00 6,000 4,350 SF 4.75 0.00 20,663 800 LF 15.00 0.00 12,000 2,100 LF 7.00 0.00 14,700 1 LS 10,000.00 0.00 10,000 1 LS 40,000.00 0.00 40,000 504,738 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo, CA 9269 1 Ph: 9494-707-5210 Fax: 949-707-5215 Page 2 of 3 Appendix F-2 Certified Construction Management, Inc. OPINION OF PROBABLE COST STUDY PROJECT: FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS LOCATION: NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA CLII-NT: DON ILER - ARCHITECT DESCRIPTION: CONCEPT'C-1' RENOVATION JOB NO: 00-019-5 ESTIMATOR: RRH JUNE 7, 2000, ITEM'. NO.I> DESCRIPTION Concept 'C-1' QUANTITY:UNIT... UNIT Geog TOTAL,,;, COST iDrfPl COST 2.200 New Buildings and Renovation of Existing Fire Station 2.201 Existing Fire Station Remodel Allowance 10,800 SF 60.00 0.00 648,000 2.202 New Fire Station One Story, Apparatus Bays 6,200 SF 200.00 0.00 1,240,000 2.203 Future Community and EOC Room 1,625 SF 175.00 0.00 284,375 2.204 Future R-1 Engine Display Building 550 SF 125.00 0.00 68,750 2.205 Future Reserve Apparatus Building 1,875 SF 85.00 0.00 159,375 2.206 New Five (5) Story Training Tower 1,500 SF 175.00 0.00 262,500 2.207 Future Shipping & Receiving Building 365 SF 100.00 0.00 36,500 2.208 Remodel Existing Small Cultural Center For Future Administration Office 1,100 SF 95.00 0.00 104,500 2.209 Remodel Existing Large Cultural Center For Future Administration Office 7,500 SF 60.00 0.00 450,000 Subtotal Section 2.20 New Building and Renovation 2.300 Structural Seismic Retrofit As Per DASSE Structural Enc' , eers Report 2.301 Existing Fire Station Seismic Retrofit 2.302 Existing Small Cultural Center Seismic Retrofit 2.303 Existing Large Cultural Center Seismic Retrofit Subtotal Section 2.20 New Building and Renovation PRORATES General conditions Design Contingency Overhead, Profit & Bonds 10,800 SF 1,100 SF 7,500 SF 8.00% 15.00% 12.00% 13.00 54.00 19.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,254,000 140,400 59,400 142,500 342,300 328,083 615,156 492,125 Subtotal 1,435,363 Appendix F-3 22542 Canaveras - Mission Viejo, CA 9269 1 Ph: 9494-707-5210 Fax: 949-707-5215 Page 3 of 3 11 DESIGN OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 8001 Irvine Center Drive, Suite 825 • Irvine, CA 92618.949/450-0444 • Fax 949/450-0448 June 6, 2000 Mr. Don Iler Don Iler Architect 13 Bridington Laguna Niguel, CA. 92677 Re: Structural Studies for National City Fire Department Headquarters Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center, National City, California DASSE Project No. 991012.01 Dear Don, The purpose of this letter report is to summarize our findings determined by a limited structural evaluation of existing buildings for the National City Fire Department. In particular, the seismic lateral load resisting systems for each building have been evaluated for conformance to the requirements of the current 1997 edition of the Uniform Building Code (UBC), The buildings evaluated were the National City Headquarters Fire Station at 333 East 16th Street and the Multi -Cultural Center at 300 East 15th Street, both in the City of National City, California. The Multi -Cultural Center consists of three separate buildings that are currently used on a limited basis only. The existing Multi -Cultural Center buildings are being considered for use by the National City Fire Department and have been evaluated for conformance to the UBC requirements for essential facilities as for the existing Headquarters Fire Station. Scope of Work The scope of our structural study for this report has included the following tasks. ® Review of original construction documents for the existing buildings. Existing geotechnical reports for both sites were not available for review. Drawings reviewed were limited to copies obtained by DASSE from the microfilm archives kept by the National City Building Department. The following is a list of the drawings reviewed for each building including the Architect and/or Structural Engineer's name and the last revision date noted on each drawing. Building Fire Station Fire Station Addition Fire Station 2nd Story Addition Date Architect/Engineer Drawings 8/10/53 Robert A. Bradt, Architect 2, 4, 5, 7 & 8 (of 10 ) 5/3/76 W. Hoffland, Engineer 1 thru 7 (of 7 ) 9/26/86 Williamson & Watts Architects T-0, A-1 thru A-11 Stedman & Dyson Engineers S-1 thru S-4 Multi -Cultural Center 3/25/65 Bldg "B" Restroom Addition National City Girls Club 1 & 2 (of 2 ) 1 Appendix G-1 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Multi -Cultural Center Buildings "C" & "D" Multi -Cultural Center 5/7/84 Bldg "C" Roof Alterations Multi -Cultural Center 3/13/92 Bldg "C" Roof Reconstruction 4/6/74 Bird, Fujimoto & Fish Architects 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 & 7 Anders & Company 1 of 1 Raymond L. Bernier Architect 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 & 9 Derk Ilott Associates, Engineer • Site visit to assess the current structural condition of the existing buildings. The site review consisted of observations of accessible areas only and did not include material testing of existing structural elements nor the exposure of covered structural elements. • Limited quantitative analysis of the existing buildings to determine significant structural elements that appear not to be in conformance with the current Uniform Building Code (UBC), 1997 edition, for essential service facilities. In particular, the seismic adequacies of the structures were evaluated for conformance to the current UBC. • Summary of the significant structural elements for each building determined not to conform to the latest UBC including brief descriptions of potential measures to retrofit the apparent deficient elements in order to be in substantial conformance with the current UBC. The following is a brief description of each of the building structures evaluated. The seismic criteria used as the evaluation basis and summaries of the most significant conditions determined not to be in conformance with the 1997 UBC for each building follow accordingly. The summaries include descriptions of potential retrofit measures for each condition identified. Building Descriptions National City Headquarters Fire Station. The existing fire station building consists of an original one-story building constructed per drawings dated 1953 and a two story addition constructed in two stages per drawings dated 1976 and 1986 respectively. Building construction is typically wood framed throughout. Refer to the site plan and key plan for the Fire Station per figures 1 and 3 respectively. The original building consists of structurally distinct areas including the apparatus room, service bay, tower and administration/dormitory areas. The total area of the original building is approximately 7500 square feet. The two-story addition adjoining the north west corner of the original building has a plan area of approximately 1400 square feet including the added covered stairway at the west side of the building. The gross floor area for the existing fire station building is approximately 10,800 square feet. The apparatus room has an elevated double -pitched roof with the ridge oriented in the north - south direction at the mid -point. Refer to figure 7. The high roof construction consists of 2" thick T & G lumber sheathing supported by heavy 6x purlins at approximately 5 feet spacing. The purlins are supported by perimeter load bearing wood stud framed walls and two interior steel frames spanning the east -west width of the apparatus room. Refer to figure 12. 2 Appendix G-2 Z3 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA The perimeter walls are typically constructed with 2 x 4 studs and 1" thick diagonal lumber sheathing at the outside face with stucco finishes at both the exterior and interior sides. The north wall of the apparatus room has three vehicle doorways. Refer to figures 8 and 9. The short widths of wall between and at the sides of the doorways are constructed with 2 x 6 studs and 3/8" thick plywood sheathing at the exterior face. The wall segments include wood posts supporting 6x wood header beams over each of the doorways and have stucco finishes at both sides. The service bay adjoining the north side of the apparatus room has a roof at an elevation above the adjoining one story area. The roofs of the service bay and the one story area west of the apparatus room are flat and typically constructed with 1" thick diagonal sheathing supported by 2x joists at 16" spacing. The floor of the two-story addition has been constructed over the roof of the one story addition. Refer to figures 10, 11 and 16. The floor construction consists of 5/8" plywood sheathing and 2x framing shaped to provide a flat floor surface over the roof of the previous one story addition. The one-story addition roof construction consists of 1" thick diagonal lumber sheathing and 2 x 12 joists at 16" spacing. The south end of the addition area is supported by a steel frame in the east -west direction that replaced the original load bearing wall removed as part of the one story addition. The steel frame supports the gravity loads tributary from the original roof and the roof and floor of the two story addition. The frame also acts as a moment frame resisting tributary lateral seismic and wind loads from both the original building and the two- story addition. The roof construction over the two story addition consists of plywood sheathing over prefabricated double -pitched wood trusses at 24" spacing. The original low roof and the floor of the two-story addition are typically supported by perimeter and interior load bearing wood stud framed walls. The perimeter walls including the exterior wall of the original building that now supports the east side of the two story addition have 1" diagonal lumber sheathing with stucco finish at the exterior face. The perimeter walls act as shear walls resisting tributary lateral seismic and wind loads. The interior walls are typically load bearing walls only with the exception of east -west walls that support the floor and roof of the two-story addition. The roof over the two-story addition is supported by 2 x 4 wood stud framed walls with 3/8" thick plywood sheathing and stucco finish at the exterior face. The two- story roof is also supported by two interior plywood sheathed stud walls aligned over walls at the first floor level. The perimeter and interior plywood walls at the second floor level act as shear walls. The tower at the north side of the building is wood framed construction consisting of wood stud framed walls with 3/8" thick plywood sheathing and stucco finish typically at the exterior side. Refer to figure 15. All load bearing walls are supported by reinforced concrete foundations. The first floor is typically 4" thick concrete slab on grade except at the apparatus room where the slab is 5" thick. The building acts as a "box system" resisting lateral seismic and wind loads. The roofs act as flexible horizontal diaphragms transferring lateral seismic and wind loads to the perimeter wood framed shear walls. The two steel frames at the apparatus room and the first floor steel frame at the south end of the two-story addition area act as moment frames resisting tributary lateral loads in the east -west direction. 3 Appendix G-3 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Multi -Cultural Center, Building "B" — Recreation and Assembly Hall. The existing building is one story construction consisting of a recreation/assembly hall adjoined by a kitchen area at the west side of the building. Refer to the site plan and key plan for building "B" per figures 1 and 4 respectively. The approximate plan dimensions for the recreation hall are 38 feet by 75 feet and 31 feet by 18 feet for the kitchen area. Original drawings for this building were not available for review but it appears that the building was originally constructed in 1960 as an addition for the National City Girls Club. A restroom addition exists at the south end of the west wall. The addition was originally constructed per drawings dated 1965 and subsequently reconstructed in conjunction with the reconstruction of the roof for building "C" per drawings dated 1992. The total area of building "B" including the kitchen and restroom areas is approximately 3700 square feet. The roof for the recreation hall is double -pitched with the ridge oriented in the north -south direction at the midpoint. Refer to figures 17 and 19. The underside of the roof is concealed by existing ceiling tiles. The roof construction is assumed to be lumber sheathing and wood purlins supported by exposed wood trusses. Refer to figures 21 and 22. The trusses span the east - west width of the recreation hall at four locations approximately 15 feet apart. The roof over the kitchen area is assumed to be similar wood framed construction but is concealed by the existing ceiling. The roof over the kitchen area is also double -pitched with the ridge oriented in the east -west direction and extending to meet the ridge over the recreation hall. Refer to figures 18 and 20. The restroom addition roof is wood framed with plywood sheathing and is supported by the adjacent exterior wall of building "C". The restroom roof slopes down from the building "C" wall. The roof is supported by concrete masonry walls at the east side of the recreation hall, adjacent to the restroom addition at the west side of the recreation hall and at the north and south sides of the kitchen area. The construction of the existing masonry walls was not able to be determined without original construction drawings. The masonry walls are assumed adequately reinforced and fully grouted. At the south end of the recreation hall and at west side of the kitchen the wall construction consists of wood stud framed walls with exterior stucco finish constructed over partial height masonry walls. Refer to figures 18 and 23. The north wall of the recreation hall is fully glazed. Refer to figure 17. The wall at the west side of the recreation hall is comprised of glazing at the north end, drywall and stucco finished wood stud walls adjacent to the kitchen area and masonry adjacent to the restroom addition at the south end. The perimeter load bearing walls are supported typically by concrete foundations. The floor areas are concrete slab on grade construction. Information noted on drawings for alterations of the kitchen area appear to indicate that a wall in the east -west direction across the width of the recreation hall was removed in conjunction with the alterations. The removed wall most likely was acting as shear wall resisting tributary lateral loads in the E-W direction. The building acts as a "box system" resisting lateral seismic and wind loads. The roofs act as flexible horizontal diaphragms transferring lateral seismic and wind loads to the perimeter masonry shear walls. At the north end of the hall, tributary lateral loads are resisted by a narrow width masonry pier at the west side of the glazed wall. 4 Appendix G-4 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Multi -Cultural Center, Building "C" — Classrooms. The building was originally constructed as two separate structures per drawings dated 1974. The original construction consisted of two 18 feet wide classroom areas with masonry perimeter walls separated by a 16 feet wide breezeway. Refer to the site plan and the key plan for building "C" per figures 1 and 5 respectively. The south area is approximately 87 feet long and the north area is approximately 64 feet long. Alterations per drawings dated 1985 added a roof over the breezeway joining the along with stud framed walls at each end to completely enclose the area. Subsequent modifications per drawings dated 1992 reconstructed the roof over both classroom blocks and the breezeway. The total combined area for building "C" considered as a single structure is approximately 3800 square feet. Refer to figures 25 and 26. The reconstructed roof is double -pitched with the ridge oriented in the east -west direction at the midpoint. The roof construction is wood framed and consists of 5/8" thick plywood sheathing over 2 x 8 joists at 16" spacing. Ceilings exist throughout the building and consist of 5/8" drywall supported by 2 x 8 joists at 16" spacing. The roof and ceilings are supported by the reinforced concrete masonry walls and concrete foundations per the original construction. The floor is a 4" thick concrete slab on grade. The interior masonry walls in the east -west direction that faced the original breezeway also support the ceilings and have wood stud framed walls added above the ceiling level to support the roof. The interior east -west walls were originally constructed with wood stud framed window walls spaced along the length of each wall. The wood framed window walls were removed and in -filled with masonry walls as part of the work to reconstruct the roof per the drawings dated 1992. At certain locations, interior masonry partition walls in the north -south direction exist across the width of each classroom block. The west portion of the south classroom block has a lower roof elevation constructed similarly to the rest of the building. The building acts as a "box system" resisting lateral seismic and wind loads. The roofs act as flexible horizontal diaphragms transferring lateral seismic and wind loads to the perimeter masonry shear walls. Multi -Cultural Center, Building "D" — Clinic The existing building is one story with plan dimensions approximately 28 feet by 42 feet. The building was constructed per drawings dated 1974. Building "D" has a total area of approximately1100 square feet. Refer to figures 27 and 28. The building does not appear to have had any alterations. The roof is wood framed construction consisting of 3/8" thick plywood sheathing supported by 2 x 8 joists at 16" spacing. Ceilings exist throughout the building. The roof and ceilings are supported by reinforced concrete masonry walls typically at the building perimeter as well as load bearing wood stud walls each side of the north -south corridor at the middle of the building. The exterior masonry walls and interior load bearing stud walls are supported by concrete foundations. The floor is a 4" thick concrete slab on grade. The building acts as a "box system" resisting lateral seismic and wind loads. The roof acts as a flexible horizontal diaphragm transferring lateral seismic and wind loads to the perimeter masonry shear walls. 5 Appendix G-5 dlo June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Seismic Evaluation Criteria The seismic lateral load resisting elements of the existing buildings were evaluated for conformance with the requirements of the current Uniform Building Code (UBC), 1997 edition. The buildings were evaluated as essential facilities using a seismic importance factor of 1.25. The seismic anchorage of the masonry walls at the roof levels of the multi -cultural center buildings was evaluated using a seismic importance factor of 1.5 as required by the current UBC. Maps of known active fault near -source zones prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology are used to determine design seismic forces per the current UBC. The nearest active seismic fault to the site is the Rose Canyon Fault approximately 5 km to the north. Refer to figure 2 attached. The UBC design level for seismic lateral forces applicable to essential facilities is affected by various factors that have varied since the original construction of the buildings evaluated. In particular, revisions to the seismic zone applicable to the San Diego area and the importance factor introduced for essential facilities have had the most significant affect on the design level seismic forces. The following is a brief history of these factors. The UBC seismic zone for the San Diego area including National City was previously seismic zone "3" for code years 1976 to 1994. Seismic zone "3" represents a design level for seismic lateral loads 75% of that for seismic zone "4" that is applicable to the majority of California. However, since the UBC 1994 edition the San Diego area has been upgraded to seismic zone "4" based on further understanding of potential seismic activity along the Rose Canyon Fault. The UBC first introduced an importance factor for seismic design level forces starting with the 1976 edition. The UBC importance factor for essential facilities was 1.5 for code years 1976 to 1988. Starting with the UBC 1988 edition the seismic importance factor was reduced to 1.25. Consequently, the design level seismic forces based on the current UBC1997 edition used as the criteria for the building evaluations are approximately 60% greater than the design level forces for construction prior to 1976. Since 1976, the design level seismic forces required by the UBC for essential facilities are approximately equivalent to current design level forces. The National City General Plan identifies other potentially active faults in the near vicinity including the La Nacion Fault immediately east of the city limits. Refer to figure 2 indicating known potentially active faults in the San Diego area. 6 Appendix G-6 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Summary of Deficient Structural Conditions and Potential Retrofit Measures The following are summaries for each building evaluated of the more significant seismic lateral load resisting elements that have been determined not to appear to conform to the requirements of the current UBC. A brief description of potential retrofit measures for each of the deficient items identified is included. Refer also to the figures 3, 4, 5 and 6 attached that provide key plans for the potential retrofit measures. The retrofit measures for each building are located numerically in accordance with the list of items for each respective building. The evaluation summaries for each building include a list of miscellaneous structural and non-structural conditions observed during the site visit that appear to require remedial measures. The miscellaneous items are not referenced on the attached key plans. In some cases the conditions observed should be remedied where noted for the current occupancy. National City Fire Department Headquarters Fire Station 1. Apparatus Room South Wall. Deficiency: The south wall of the apparatus room with the vehicle doorways does not have the required shear wall capacity for tributary east -west lateral loads. The north wall of the apparatus room will likely move independently of the adjoining low roof area over the administration offices when resisting seismic lateral loads. Damage resulting from the independent seismic movement at the different roof levels may result in partial collapse of the low roof area and prevent the vehicle doors from being operated. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct the entire wall with steel braced frames and new reinforced concrete footings at each side of the wall including added horizontal framing inter -connecting the doorway header beams to each frame. Reconstruct the wall sections between the doors with plywood sheathing each side. Replace the exterior stucco finish for the entire wall. Add strut framing and connections in the east -west direction across the low roof over the administration offices. The added struts would be aligned with the north wall of the apparatus room to interconnect the roof levels. The existing roof will need to have added nailing to the struts. 2. Apparatus Room Steel Portal Frames. Deficiency: The steel portal frames spanning the east —west width of the apparatus room at two locations will likely move independently of the adjoining low roof area along the west side when resisting seismic lateral loads. The differential movement between the frame columns and the low roof will likely result in damage and may lead to partial collapse of the low roof area. Potential Retrofit: Add strut framing and connections in the east -west direction across the low roof above the dormitory areas and extending across the floor of the two- story area. Nail existing roof to added struts. Add strut connections to the columns of the frames at the apparatus room to interconnect the roof levels. 7 Appendix G-7 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA 3. East-West Interior 1st Floor Shear Wall at 2 Story Addition Deficiency: The first floor wall in the east -west direction separating the kitchen and dormitory areas does not have sufficient capacity to resist tributary lateral loads and does not appear to be adequately connected to the adjoining low roof area. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct the existing first floor wall with added studs, plywood sheathing on both sides and additional foundation connections. Add strut framing and connections in the east -west direction across the low roof extending across the floor of the two-story area. Add strut connections to the steel frame column at the apparatus room. Nail the existing low roof and floor sheathing to the added struts. 4. Apparatus Room North Wall. Deficiency: The wall at the north end of the apparatus room adjoining the service bay does not have sufficient capacity to resist tributary lateral loads and does not appear to be adequately connected to the adjoining low roof area. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct the existing stud walls with added studs, plywood sheathing on one side and additional foundation connections. Add strut framing and connections in the east -west direction across the low roof above the recreation area and connected to the existing east -west shear wall that separates the kitchen and equipment room areas. 5. North Wall at Low Roof Area. Deficiency: The wall at he north end of the original low roof does not appear to not have sufficient capacity to resist tributary lateral loads and does not appear to be adequately connected to adjoining areas. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct the existing stud walls between existing windows with added studs, plywood sheathing on one side and foundation connections. Add top plate connections in the east -west direction. 6. North Wall at Service Bay. Deficiency: The narrow width of wall each side of the doorway at the north end of the service bay does not appear to have sufficient capacity to resist tributary lateral loads. The wall does not appear to be adequately connected to the adjoining tower structure. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct the entire wall with steel braced frames and new reinforced concrete footings at each side of the doorway including connections from the doorway header beam to each frame. Add connections from the service bay wall and roof to the adjoining walls of the tower structure. 8 Appendix G-8 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA 7. Apparatus Room East Wall. Deficiency: The exterior wall at the east side of the apparatus room does not appear to have sufficient capacity to resist tributary lateral loads. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct the existing wall between existing windows with added studs, plywood sheathing on one side and foundation connections. 8. North -South Interior 1st Floor Shear Wall at 2 Story Addition Deficiency: The interior north -south first floor wall supporting the east side of the two story addition does not appear to be adequate to resist tributary lateral loads. A portion of this wall line was removed at the recreation room as part of the one story addition work. The wall does not appear to be adequately connected to the adjoining low roof area over the administration offices. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct the portion of existing wall that separates the dormitory and restroom areas with added studs, plywood sheathing on both sides and additional foundation bolts. Add strut framing and connections in the north - south direction across the low roof extending over the administration office area. Nail existing roof sheathing to added struts. 9. Exterior West Wall at 2 Story Addition Deficiency: The exterior west wall at the first floor level supporting the west side of the two story addition does not appear to be adequate to resist tributary lateral loads. Potential Retrofit: Reconstruct portions of the existing wall between existing windows including the south end of the wall supporting the original one story roof. Add studs, plywood sheathing on one side and foundation connections. 10. Miscellaneous Structural and Non -Structural Conditions (a) Mechanical equipment at low roof area not seismically anchored. Refer to figure 16. (b) Lack of drainage at low roof area between two-story addition and apparatus room. (c) Decaying T & G roof sheathing at apparatus room roof overhangs. (d) Decayed bases at stair landing wood posts at the north side of the two-story addition. (e) Damaged metal hanger supporting stair stringer at the north side of two-story addition. Refer to figure 11. (f) Water heater not seismically braced per National City Building Department standards. (g) Electrical switchgear cabinet and emergency generator outside the east side of the service bay do not appear to be seismically anchored. Refer to figure 14. (h) Mechanical ductwork suspended from the apparatus room roof not seismically braced. Refer to figure 13. (i) Settled and cracked exterior concrete slab at training yard with apparent lack of surface drainage. 9 Appendix G-9 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Multi -Cultural Center, Building "B" — Recreation and Assembly Hall 1. Seismic Out of Plane Wall Anchorage for East and West Masonry Walls.. Deficiency: Although concealed it is assumed that the existing anchorage of the perimeter masonry walls at the west and east sides of the building are not adequate for current design level forces. Potential Retrofit: Add wood 3x minimum struts at four feet spacing to the underside of the existing roof perpendicular to the east and west walls. The struts need to extend approximately eight feet into the roof and the existing roof sheathing nailed to the struts. Add metal strap ties fastened to the struts and provide bolted connections at the top of the masonry walls. Refer to figure 4 indicating the retrofit locations. 2. Seismic Out of Plane Wall Anchorage for Masonry Walls at Kitchen. Deficiency : Although concealed it is assumed that the existing anchorage of the perimeter masonry walls at the north and south sides of the kitchen area are not adequate for current design level forces. Potential Retrofit: Add wood 3x minimum struts at four feet spacing to the underside of the existing roof perpendicular to the north and south walls. The struts need to extend approximately eight feet into the roof and the existing roof sheathing nailed to the struts. Add metal strap ties fastened to the added struts and provide bolted connections at the top of the masonry walls. Refer to figure 4 indicating the retrofit locations. 3. Seismic Out of Plane Bracing for South Wall. Deficiency: The partial height masonry wall at the south side of the recreation hall does not extend to the sloping roof level and is not laterally braced for out -of plane seismic forces. Refer to figure 23. Potential Retrofit: Add steel columns at the inside of the south wall extending to the roof level. Add wood 3x minimum struts perpendicular to the columns extending approximately 8 feet connecting the columns to the underside of the existing roof. Nail existing roof to added struts. Refer to figure 4 indicating the locations for the added south wall bracing. 4. Seismic Out of Plane Bracing for West Wall at Kitchen. Deficiency: The partial height masonry wall at the west side of the kitchen does not extend to the sloping roof level and is not laterally braced for out -of plane seismic forces. Refer to figure 18. Potential Retrofit: Remove existing hard ceiling at the kitchen area and replace with plywood sheathing throughout with a new drywall finish. Add connections at 4 feet spacing connecting the top of the partial height masonry wall to minimum 3x framing incorporated with the new plywood framed ceiling. 10 Appendix G-10 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA 5. Roof Truss Anchors at Masonry Walls. Deficiency: Although concealed it is assumed that the existing anchorage of the exterior masonry walls to the ends of the roof trusses is not adequate. Potential Retrofit: Add steel strap connections bolted top the masonry walls and to the ends of the existing roof trusses at 6 locations as indicated by figure 4. 6. Lateral Bracing for North Wall. Deficiency: The wall at the north end of the recreation hall is fully glazed and relies on only a single masonry pier for resisting tributary lateral loads. Refer to figure 17. The existing masonry pier and roof framing drag connections do not appear to be adequate. The lateral loads tributary to the north wall may also have been increased by the removal of an interior wall. Potential Retrofit: Add steel diagonal bracing in an inverted "V" configuration either behind or in front of the existing glazed wall. Alternatively, additional reinforced concrete masonry wall piers and concrete foundations could be added at each side of the wall requiring the partial removal of the existing glazing. 7. Seismic Out of Plane Wall Anchorage for Masonry Walls at Restroom. Deficiency: The existing anchorage of the masonry wall at building "C" to the roof framing at the restroom area are not adequate for current design level forces. Potential Retrofit: Add wood 3x minimum struts at four feet spacing parallel to the existing roof joists and perpendicular to the masonry wall at building "C". Add bolted connections to the masonry wall and nail existing roof sheathing to the struts. 8. Retrofit Connections for Existing Roof Trusses. Deficiency: The existing exposed roof trusses spanning the width of recreation hall were observed to have distress at the typical web to chord bolted strap connections. Refer to figures 21 and 22. Potential Retrofit: Subject to a more detailed analysis of the existing trusses to verify their vertical load carrying capacity, the existing bolted strap connections may need to replaced and upgraded. 9. Miscellaneous Structural and Non -Structural Conditions (a) Mechanical equipment at the kitchen roof may not be seismically anchored. Refer to figure 20. (b) Heater units suspended from the underside of the recreation hall at two locations do not have lateral seismic bracing. Refer to figure 24. (c) Water heater not seismically braced per National City Building Department standards. (d) Decaying roof sheathing at roof overhangs at the north end of the building. (e) Metal guardrails at exterior walkways and above the site wall at the north and west sides of the parking lot do not appear to meet current UBC requirements. 11 Appendix G-11 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Multi -Cultural Center, Building "C" — Classrooms 1. Seismic Out of Plane Wall Anchorage for Exterior Masonry Walls. Deficiency: The anchorage of the exterior masonry walls at each side of the building is not adequate for seismic out -of -plane forces. Potential Retrofit: Add wood 3x minimum struts or blocking at four feet spacing to the underside of the existing roof perpendicular to the exterior walls. Metal strap ties need to be fastened to the underside of the added struts and provided with bolted connections at the masonry walls. Nail existing roof sheathing to added struts. Refer to figure 5 indicating the retrofit locations. 2. Seismic Out of Plane Wall Anchorage for Interior Masonry Walls. Deficiency: The reconstruction of the roof over the building raised the roof to be supported by stud framing over the interior east -west masonry walls. Drawings for the reconstruction do not show adequate details for laterally anchoring the top of the masonry walls including the interior north -south masonry partition walls. Potential Retrofit: Remove the existing drywall ceiling and replace with plywood sheathing throughout the entire area. Add 3x minimum framing and/or blocking with connections bolted to the top of the interior walls. Replace drywall ceilings. Refer to figure 5 indicating the retrofit locations. 3. Seismic Out of Plane Bracing Interior Masonry In -Fill Walls. Deficiency: The partial height interior masonry walls in the east -west direction were originally constructed with wood framed window wall sections. The wood framed sections were later replaced with masonry in -fill in conjunction with the work to reconstruct the roof. Details for the in -fill walls on the alteration drawings do not appear to provide adequate bracing for the walls. The adjacent original masonry walls do not appear adequate to laterally brace the added in -fill masonry. Potential Retrofit: Add two steel columns at one side of each of the eight masonry in -fill wall sections. The added columns need to extend to the ceiling level and connect with bolted metal strap ties to added framing incorporated with the reconstructed ceiling per item no. 2 above. Refer to figure 5 indicating the locations for the added in -fill wall bracing. 12 Appendix G-12 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA 4. Roof Diaphragm Shear Transfer to Interior Masonry Walls. Deficiency: The reconstructed roof with plywood sheathed diaphragm was raised above the interior masonry walls. Drawings for the alteration do not appear to provide details that would allow north -south seismic lateral forces to be transferred from the raised roof diaphragm to the interior masonry partition walls. The interior partition walls functioned as shear walls for the original lower roof construction. The existing roof diaphragm is not adequate to span the full length of the building between the exterior east and west walls. Potential Retrofit: Add wood stud walls with plywood sheathing at one side above the interior north -south masonry walls at three locations. Add 4x struts across the width of the roof with bolted connections aligned with each of the interior masonry walls. Nail existing roof sheathing to the added struts. Refer to figure 5 indicating the retrofit locations. 5. Roof Diaphragm Shear Transfer to Exterior West Masonry Walls. Deficiency: Drawings for the reconstructed roof do not appear to provide details that would allow north -south seismic lateral forces to be transferred from the raised roof diaphragm to the exterior masonry wall at the west side of the building. Potential Retrofit: Add 4x struts across the width of the roof with bolted connections aligned with exterior masonry wall at the west side of the north classroom block. Nail existing roof sheathing to added struts. Refer to figure 5 indicating the retrofit locations. 6. Miscellaneous Structural and Non -Structural Conditions (a) Mechanical equipment at the roof may not be seismically anchored. 13 Appendix G-13 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Multi -Cultural Center, Building "D" - Clinic 1. Seismic Out of Plane Wall Anchorage for East and West Masonry Walls. Deficiency: The anchorage of the exterior masonry walls at the east and west sides of the building are not adequate for seismic out -of -plane forces. Potential Retrofit: Add wood 3x minimum struts at four feet spacing alongside the existing roof joists. The roof sheathing needs to be nailed to the added struts. Add metal strap connections bolting the struts to the top of the masonry walls. Add top plate connections at the interior load bearing stud walls. Refer to figure 6 indicating the retrofit locations. 2. Seismic Out of Plane Wall Anchorage for North and South Masonry Walls. Deficiency: The anchorage of the exterior masonry walls at the north and south sides of the building are not adequate for seismic out -of -plane forces. Potential Retrofit: Add wood 3x minimum blocking at four feet spacing to the underside of the existing roof extending 8 feet minimum perpendicular to the north and south walls. Metal strap ties need to be fastened to the underside of the blocking and provided with bolted connections at the masonry walls. Nail existing roof sheathing to blocking. Refer to figure 6 indicating the retrofit locations 3. Seismic Out of Plane Bracing for Parapets at North and South Masonry Walls. Deficiency: The north and south masonry walls have parapets extending above the roof level that do not appear to have adequate strength for the unbraced height. Potential Retrofit: Add diagonal steel braces at 4'-0" spacing bolted near the top of the masonry parapets and connected to the added roof framing supports. 4. Roof Diaphragm Sheathing. Deficiency: The existing 3/8" plywood roof sheathing is unblocked and does not have adequate nailing to resist current design level lateral seismic loads. Potential Retrofit: Remove and replace existing roof with %" plywood sheathing and added blocking for nailing at all plywood edges. Replace built-up roof covering. 5. Miscellaneous Structural and Non -Structural Conditions (a) Mechanical equipment at the roof may not be seismically anchored. (b) Wood header beams above the entry at the north west corner have missing bolts at their support saddles and do have bearing contact on the saddles. 14 Appendix G-14 3s June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Conclusion We have completed a limited structural evaluation of the subject buildings for compliance with the current 1997 Uniform Building Code (UBC) for essential services facilities. The more significant structural conditions that appear not to conform are presented based on site observations and a limited review of the available original construction drawings. The existing Fire Station Headquarters building appears to have been constructed in general conformance with the original design drawings dated 1953 and drawings for the additions dated 1976 and 1986. The building is typically one-story construction with a partial two-story addition consisting of wood framed construction supported by concrete foundations. The capacities of the existing shear walls are the most significant non -conforming conditions determined. The interaction of the different roof levels is another significant concern. Remedial measures appear to be required to reduce the potential for seismic damage that would likely prevent the fire station from being functional and may result in an extended period of reparation disabling occupancy. Potential measures to retrofit the non -conforming conditions are presented. The existing Multi -Cultural Center consists of three separate buildings. The buildings are one- story construction with wood framed roofs and masonry walls supported by concrete foundations. Building "B" is designated a recreation/assembly hall and includes an adjoining kitchen and restroom addition. Original design drawings for this building were not available for review. Building "C" is designated classrooms and appears to be constructed in general conformance with the original design drawings dated 1976 and drawings for reconstruction of the roof dated 1992. Building "D" was originally designated a clinic and appears to be constructed in general conformance with the original design drawings dated 1976. The seismic anchorage of the masonry walls at the roofs is the most significant non -conforming condition determined. The seismic resistance at the north glazed wall at building "B" and the seismic lateral load transfer from the roof to the masonry walls at building "C" are further significant concerns. Potential measures to retrofit the non -conforming conditions are presented. In order to more accurately determine the scope of work to retrofit the non -conforming conditions a detailed review of the existing buildings would be required. The review would require quantitative analysis of the identified items and limited exposure of existing conditions. We trust this report letter assists you at this time and we look forward to providing further structural engineering services for this project that you may require. Please contact our office if you have any questions regarding our preliminary findings presented in this letter report. Sincerely, DASSE Design of So ern California, Inc. obert D. Scheibel, S.E. Gary R. Mills, S.E. Principal GRM/vl Enclosures Senior Project Engineer 15 Appendix G-15 3!0 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA E16THSirrti FIRE STATION HEADQUARTERS (1953) BUILDING "C" CLASSROOM (1976, 1992) ADDITIONS (1976, 1986) STORAGE SHED Figure 1 E 15 TH STREET PRIVATE PROPERTY RESTROOM ADDITION (1965, 1992) KITCHEN ADDITION BLDG. "D" CLINIC (1974) T Site Plan National City Fire Station Headquarters and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA 16 J Appendix G-16 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 2 Contours of closest horizontal distance to known active seismic sources 5 kilometers Active Fault Near -Source Zones — National City, CA California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology 17 5 km 10 km 10 Appendix G-17 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA ROOF OVERHANG TYP. (E) STEEL FRAME --------- ----- APPARATUS Figure 3 ,a w alp (E) STEIEL FRAME TOWER ADMIN. OFFICES (E) STEEL Key Plan for Seismic Retrofit Headquarters Fire Station, 333 East 16th Street, National City, CA 18 Appendix G-18 3E June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA TY P TYP. (6) PLACES C Figure 4 C ELEVATION TYP. ROOF TRUSS TYP. ' 4'-0" O.C. w c.) it (E)TRUSS TYP. BUILDING "C" TYP. 4'0"O.C. J 4'-O" O.C. (E) TRUSS - - ROOF RIDGE/ WALL LEGBD rULL HEIGHT MASONRY' WALL PARTIAL HEIGHT MASONRY WALL WITH WOOD FRAMED WALL ABOVE STUCCO/WOOD FRAMED WALL GYP. BOARD/WOOD FRAMED WALL _J TYP. !'-0" O.C. ROOF OVERHANG TYP. GLAZED WALL Key Plan for Seismic Retrofit Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", 300 East 15th Street, National City, CA 19 C Appendix G-19 40 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA TYP. OF (3) PLACES TYP. AT IN -FILL WALL TYP. OF (3) PLACES TYP. TYP (E) INTERIOR CMU WALL WHERE OCCURSS OSECTION BUILDING "B" (E) ROOF JOISTS (E) CEILING JOISTS WALL LECEND FULL HEIGHT MASONRY WALL PARTIAL HEIGHT MASONRY WALL WITH WOOD FRAMED WALL ABOVE IN -FILL MASONRY WALL STUCCO/WOOD FRAMED WALL Figure 5 TYP. TYP. OF (3) PLACES TYP. OF (3) PLACES Key Plan for Seismic Retrofit Multi -Cultural Center Building "C", 300 East 15th Street, National City, CA 20 Appendix G-20 41 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA (E) LOAD BEARING STUD WALL TYP. a 4-0 O.C. TYP. OF (7) PLACES a TYP. TYP. g 4'-0" O.C. 4'-0" 0.C. Figure 6 TYP. 4'-0" 0.0. a a a TYP. OF (6) PLACES a a ji (b) TYP. 4'-0" 0.C. (E) ROOF BEAMS Key Plan for Seismic Retrofit Multi -Cultural Center Building "D", 300 East 15th Street, National City, CA 21 Appendix G-21 43, June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 7 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA South Elevation Figure 8 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA South Elevation at Apparatus Room 22 Appendix G-22 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 9 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA East Elevation at South Corner Figure 10 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA West Elevation 23 Appendix G-23 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 11 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA North Elevation at 2nd Story Addition Figure 12 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA Apparatus Room Interior 24 Appendix G-24 45 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 13 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA Suspended Mechanical Ducts at Apparatus Room Figure 14 Headquarters Fire Station, National City, CA Emergency Generator 25 Appendix G-25 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 15 Headquarters Fire Station National City, CA Tower Elevation at North Side 26 Figure 16 Headquarters Fire Station National City, CA Mechanical Equipment at Low Roof Appendix G-26 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 17 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", National City, CA North Elevation Figure 18 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", National City, CA West Elevation 27 Appendix G-27 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 19 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", National City, CA East Elevation Figure 20 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", National City, CA Mechanical Equipment at Kitchen Roof 28 Appendix G-28 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 21 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", National City, CA Interior Elevation of Typical Roof Truss Figure 22 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", National City, CA Typical Roof Truss Chord Connection 29 Appendix G-29 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 23 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B" National City, CA Interior Elevation South Wall 30 Figure 24 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B" National City, CA Suspended Heater Unit Appendix G-30 gi June 6,2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 25 Multi -Cultural Center Building "C", National City, CA West Elevation Figure 26 Multi -Cultural Center Building "C", National City, CA East Elevation 31 Appendix G-31 June 6, 2000 Structural Studies HQ Fire Station and Multi -Cultural Center National City, CA Figure 27 Multi -Cultural Center Building "D", National City, CA West Elevation Figure 28 Multi -Cultural Center Building "B", National City, CA North Elevation 32 Appendix G-32 FIRE DEPARTMENT SUB -COMMITTEE REPORT ON USE OF THE MULTI -CULTURAL CENTER AS A TEMPORARY HOUSING FACILITY OBJECTIVE: To complete an assessment of the Multi -Cultural Center as a temporary housing facility during the phased construction of the new fire station. Included in the assessment would be any needed modifications to the Multi -Cultural Center. ACTION: The Sub -Committee met and assessed the Multi -Cultural Center (MCC). During the assessment, the Sub -Committee members discussed numerous Fire Department uses for the building. Upon completion of the assessment it was concluded that the buildingwould not be suitable as 7/24 temporary living quarters during the construction of a new fire station. This opinion is based on the following findings: 1. The interior layout of the building is not conducive to the upgrades that would be required to make suitable living and operational areas for 7/24 Operations personnel. The areas needed are as follows: A. Bathroom/shower/personal hygiene. B. Sleeping quarters with adequate ventilation. C. Classroom training. D. Fire apparatus parking. 1. Inadequate and unsecured parking for City and personal vehicles. 2. Inadequate heating, ventilation and air conditioning. 3. Electronic requirements: A. Computer cable. B. Telephone cable and switching equipment. C. Station Alerting System (safety lights activated for evening responses). In addition to the above findings, significant remodeling expenditures would be re required to bring the MCC to a livable condition to meet a very short tern objective. The Sub -Committee does, however, support the use of the MCC for the storage of Fire Department equipment. In using the MCC for storage, a short-term goal of freeing up areas in the current facility is achieved. Another important use for the MCC is as a manipulative training site. At present, there is no place in the City to conduct hose lay evolutions, ladder drills, and search and rescue training. Although this location has several limiting factors including the need to close the 300 block of E. 15th Street during drills, and the potential for damage to the building as a result of laddering, hose dragging and related training, the site is preferable to what is available at this time. Appendix H-1 CONCLUSION: Based on the above findings, it is the recommendation of the Sub -Committee that the MCC not be used as temporary living quarters during the construction of the Fire Station Project. It is felt that the MCC is inadequate to meet the most basic health and safety requirements and would lead to many problems during the estimated 12-month construction phase of the new building. Appendix H-2 DONS !JJf RS A^tette g r "BALDNESS YOU CAN TRUST" 9 JUNE 2000 NATIONAL CITY HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION STUDY - PHASE III PHASED CONSTRUCTION OVERVIEW (Concept Site Plans "A" and "Cl") CONCEPT SITE PLAN "A" PHASE I • Fire Administration/Operations remain in existing Headquarters Fire Station. • Demolish Multi -Cultural Center buildings "C" and "D" (See figure 1-key plan in seismic report) and existing residences. • Construct new facility from truck bay west with new front apron. PHASE II • Move Operations over to occupy new facility. • Move Administration to Multi -Cultural Center building "B" with only minor remodeling. • Demolish existing Headquarters Fire Station. • Construct new 2 story administrative portion of new facility (east of truck bay). PHASE III • Move Administration over to occupy new Administrative facility. • Demolish Multi -Cultural Center building "B". • Demolish all existing site improvements, retaining walls, 15th street, etc. • Construct new training tower • Construct all new site improvements. WORLD q.s HEADQUARTERS 13 BRIDINGTON LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIFORNIA 92677-2932 949-443-3320 4^ (FAX) 949-443-3322 Appendix I-1 Page 2 NATIONAL CITY HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION STUDY - PHASE III CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION-CONCEPT SITE PLAN "A" Although phased construction could take place as aforementioned, I would strongly recommend against it. This phased construction scenario would require multiple mobilizations of the general contractor and his subcontractors and greatly impact negatively the logical/efficient sequencing of work/trade efforts. Some monies would be spent to house the Administration areas in Multi -Cultural Center building "B," which would later be demolished. This phased construction scenario could, in my opinion, easily add 20-25% to the construction cost (1.4 to 1.75 million dollars) of the project. It would also extend the construction schedule from approximately one year (single phased project) to possibly close to two years. The negative cost and time ramifications to phased construction in this particular project • far outweigh the costs and inconvenience of moving Fire Operations/Administrative personell offsite in temporary facilities allowing for the whole project to be constructed in one phase. CONCEPT SITE PLAN "Cl" In concept site plan "Cl" all existing facilities (other than existing residences) are to be remodeled/seismically upgraded to- meet current UBC essential facility requirements. As outlined in the structural study report, the extent and difficulty of the work required to bring these facilities up to code is so extensive that, in my opinion, all of the facilities would need to be vacated. Required demolition, dust control and invasive upgrading measures would not allow for any occupancy to take place, not only for functional, but also for safety reasons. It has been deemed by Fire Department Operations personell that the existing Multi - Cultural Center is not condusive to temporarily house them. I am in agreement with this opinion. So, any phased construction in site concept "Cl", if it even could physically be accomplished, would still require locating the Operations functions/quarters offsite during construction. Appendix I-2 Page 3 NATIONAL CITY HEADQUARTERS FIRE STATION STUDY - PHASE III In addition, the specialized nature of this seismic retrofitting work would result in much higher construction costs if the contractor had to upgrade in phases, as well as extend the construction schedule dramatically. For these reasonsFphased construction for concept site plan "Cl", in my opinion, is not feasible or recommended. Respectfully Submitted, LefitQ"w Don Her Don Her - Architect DT/ki (2001-15) Appendix I-3 FIRE DEPARTMENT TEMPORARY FACILITIES PROPOSAL GOAL: Provide temporary facilities during 12-month construction phase of Fire Station #10. Background: Fire Department Staff was directed to evaluate the use of the Multi -Cultural Center (MCC) as temporary quarters during phased construction of Fire Station #10. A committee was formed and an evaluation was completed. The Committee determined that the MCC would require many improvements in addition to not meeting basis operational requirements. Committee Findings are documented in attached Report "Fire Department Sub -Committee Report - Multi - Cultural Center as Temporary Facility". As an alternative Fire Department Staff recommends the following proposal: PLAN: Transition Move I: Fire Administration/Fire Inspectors (7-10 Personnel) Move Fire Admin/Fire Inspection staff to Public Works Hoover Avenue Offices Advantages: Telephones and computer network are in place. Supports current centralizing of Public Works/Engineering Management Staffs; provides security for Staff Vehicles, room for fire apparatus to safely park when conducting business with Fire Administrative Staff, supports routine Fire Department activities (refueling, equipment repairs, etc); utilizes existing available City owned spaces; no remodeling required; secure building. Estimated Costs Transition Move I: $3,000. (Includes use of Moving Contractor) Transition Move II: Truck Company 5736 (12 personnel, 4 on duty), reserve fire apparatus engine 5735 and fire equipment. Move 1 fire company 5736 (Ladder Truck) from the Station #10 to Public Works Facility. Rent 2-10' x 40' Trailers capable of housing 4 personnel and locate this modular unit in the same location that temporary transit offices were previously located. Provide temporary canopy for fire apparatus. Locate physical fitness equipment in trailer space. Locate Reserve Fire Engine 5735 next to trailer with canopy cover or in existing Public Works Storage spaces. Locate fire equipment in storage container or existing Public Works storage spaces. Locate compressed breathing apparatus air cylinders at Public Works Facility. Compressed breathing air to be provided by outside contractor or other source. Utilizes Utility connections remaining from temporary Transit Offices, Public Works compound provides security for Fire Apparatus, secure employee parking available, after hour security for Public Works compound, little or no impact to residential neighborhood caused by emergency response vehicles. Appendix J-1 Estimated Costs Transition Move II: Trailer Rental 9,900 Trailer Delivery 700 Leveling Fee 1,300 Seismic Bracing 4,400 Handicap Ramp 4,600 Electrical, Sewer, Water 5,000 Telecommunications Equipment 7,000 Temporary Canopy 2,000 Misc. 1.000 $35,900 Transition Move III: Engine Company 5734 and Platoon Supervisor (13 personnel, 5 on duty) Locate 2nd Fire Company 5734 to Civic Center Basement area. Utilize existing kitchen area for cooking & dining; convert detention holding rooms to dormitory spaces; utilize existing showers and restrooms; utilize Emergency Operating Center (EOC) for office areas (EOC to remain fully functional); park fire apparatus in parking stall, South/East corner of Civic Center, under the 2nd floor over hang (Secure remaining open areas around apparatus with temporary chain link fence enclosure. Locate Platoon Commander vehicle, office and living space utilizing National City Crisis Team Office spaces and apparatus floor area currently located at Station #15. Relocate Crisis Team Office to Civic Center EOC. Utilizes existing building spaces, phones, computer network etc. Estimated Costs Transition Move Ill: Chain Link Fence 1,500 Misc. 1.000 $2,500 Estimated Total Costs for temporary Fire Department Facilities = $41,400 Benefits: 1. Entire site at 16th & "D" Ave can be dedicated to construction, allowing for the Project to be completed cheaper, faster and with less impact to the adjoining neighborhood. 2. Separates emergency response vehicles from construction activities. 3. Provides safe and clean environment for Fire Department operations. 4. Avoids costs associated with renting commercial facilities. 5. Avoids costs of installing additional telephone equipment and computer network equipment. 6. Provides security for fire apparatus and personnel. 7. Avoids costs associated with remodeling of Multi Cultural Center. Appendix J-2 Go CDC of National City Memo To: Randy Kimble, Fire Chief From: Paul Desrochers, Executive Direc Date: 06/12/2000 Re: New Fire Station — Use of HUD Section 108 Loan Program Use of the Section 108 Loan Program from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is under consideration as the main financing vehicle to construct a new main fire station. The following memorandum is being provided by your request to outline the following: • Eligibility of Fire related costs per CDBG Guidelines. • Section 108 Debt service payments/effect on annual CDBG program budget. • Impact of a 108 Loan for a new Fire Station on City's Five Year Consolidated Plan Strategy for FY 2000-05. All capital expenditures. (not operating) related to fire fighting is an eligible expense per CDBG Guidelines, except for the offices of the Fire Chief and other administrative staff. This "administrative" portion of the project is currently estimated to represent 25% of all costs (approximately $8 million). This would mean that 75%, or $6 million, of the new fire station could be funded by CDBG. This "administrative" restriction is almost a mute point in this scenario because the City is only able to bond five times the amount of its annual CDBG entitlement or approximately $7 million. Issuance costs for the 108 Loan are usually less than point or 1% of loan proceeds. A 108 Loan in the amount of $6 million over a 20-year payment period would require an annual debt service payment from the CDBG program of approximately $550,000. The total cost of the CDBG funded portion of the project with interest would be approximately $11 million over 20 years. With the annual CDBG entitlement being approximately $1.4 million, this would mean that approximately 40% of the annual CDBG program budget would be spent toward a new fire station for the next 20 years. CDC staff broached this subject with senior staff from the HUD Los Angeles Office and they were hesitant to lend their support for • Page 1 Appendix K-1 such a large portion of CDBG going to a new fire station due to the many other needs of lower income households in the community. The City Council approved the National City's new Five Year Consolidated Plan Strategic Plan for FY 2000-05 last month. The Plan provides the "blueprint" for the five-year expenditure of CDBG and HOME funds estimated to be approximately $10 million over the next five years. In brief terms, the Plan describes the many needs of the community, both social and economic, and provides a strategy of how those needs should be addressed with HUD's financial resources. As is always true, the community needs outweigh the funding available to finance those needs by a large amount. The approved Plan currently allocates 3% of CDBG funds over the next five years to fire fighting related expenditures. When staff formulated these costs in the Plan, fire -fighting equipment, not a new station, was the contemplated expenditure. The Consolidated Plan would have to be amended to provide for the expenditure of $6 million for a new fire station. In this amendment, the City would have to explain how the other needs of lower income households would be addressed with only 60% of annual CDBG funds available for other projects and programs, besides a new fire station, that will benefit National City's lower income households. My proposal for an alternative method of using CDBG would be to cap CDBG- funded debt service for a new fire station at $300,000 per year for a 108 Loan of $3 million to $3.5 million. This loan would represent approximately 37-44% of total project costs of $8 million while still allowing flexibility in the CDBG Program to fund other projects and programs that benefit lower income households. That being said, even this alternative would probably be seen by HUD as a questionable expenditure in light of the needs of lower income households in National City and would still require Consolidated Plan amendment. • Page 2 Appendix K-2 AGENDA ITEM #21 6/20/00 June 14, 2000 The Honorable George H. Waters, Mayor City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 Dear Mayor Waters, On June 23, 24 and 25, in San Francisco, the Boys & Girls Clubs of National City's Traveling Youth Soccer team will represent our city. We will be taking 10 youths from National City to compete in a soccer tournament. We estimate the total cost of the trip will be $3,000 and would respectfully request a donation of $250 from the City to help defray the costs of this exciting trip for our youngsters. Thank you for your time in this matter and thank you in advance for your gift to the children we serve. Sincerely, Gr Beatie Executive Director The Positive Place For Kids BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS of National City 1430 D Avenue National City, CA 91950 (619) 477 - 5445 Fax (619) 477-9177 Officers President Ronald Detzer, Esq. 1• Vice President Louise C. Phipps, Ed.D. Ye Vice President Steve South Secretary /Treasurer Diane Tagle Past President Victoria "Vicky" Waters Board of Directors Skip DiCerchio Cheryl Doors, M.A. George Hood Mike Iglesias Janice Martinelli Ralph Mora Ben Nichols Frank Pairs Tim Patten Jim Poe Attie Pruitt Jess Van Deventer Ann Vroom Honorary Board Members John & Christy Walton Mayor George H. Waters Capt Leendert R. Hering, Sr., USN Executive Director Gregory P. Beatie Rename Development Dlrester Tim J. Hall Programs Director Joel Baeza Old Manager Susan C. Volkenant SuPpat d•In part. by Miff? was =.,M AGENCY sine City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 ITEM TITLE REPORT ON MUNICIPAL POOL PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Staff was requested to come up with a report regarding additional hours and a monthly pass for implementation this summer. AGENDA ITEM NO. 22 Attached report. Jim Ruiz (/Jt \ DEPARTMENT Parks & Recreation Environmental Review x N/A Financial Statement Account No. AFF RECOMMENDATION Implement suggested schedule and suggested summer pass. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS :Listed Below) Resolution No. Report A-20D (Rev. 9/80) City of National City Parks & Recreation Department 140 East Twelfth Street, Suite A, National City, CA 91950-3312 (619) 336-4290 DATE: June 12, 2000 TO: City Council FROM: Jim Ruiz, Parks and Recreation Directo SUBJECT: Municipal Pool At the budget meeting of June 9t1, staff was requested to submit a report addressing the request for additional recreation swim time at the pool and also some kind of a monthly pass. The schedule for the National School District calls for the last day of school to be on Thursday, June 29th. Regular classes will not begin again until August 24t. This gives the students approximately eight weeks off, unless they attend summer school classes which will be offered during the month of July. Present Schedule Suggested Schedule Recreation Swim: Monday through Friday 1-4 p.m. Wednesday (14 and over) 7-9 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 1-4 p.m. Monday through Friday Mon/Wed/Fri. (14 and over) Saturday and Sunday 1-4 p.m. 7-9 p.m. 11-5 p.m. Adult Noon Swim: Monday through Friday 12-1 p.m. Monday through Friday 12-1 p.m. Saturday and Sunday 11-1 p.m. Weekends — No reserve time for adult swim. Must swim along with all the others. SUGGESTED SUMMER PASS Summer Pass (NO REFUNDS) 30 admissions for $25. In order to implement this program, no additional funds will be required because it is anticipated that the increased admission fee will cover the additional eight hours per week. Recycled Paper City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 23 ITEM TITLE SUMMER CONCERT PREPARED BY JIM RUIZ EXPLANATION _ Report on summer concert attached. DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION Environmental Review XX N/A Financial Statement Funding in the amount of $22,500 provided by the Port District Account No. TAFF RECOMMENDATION Request council direction. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Report Resolutions No. A-200 (Rev. 9/80) City of National City Parks & Recreation Department 140 East Twelfth Street, Suite A, National City, CA 91950-3312 (619) 336-4290 June 15, 2000 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: JIM RUIZ, PARKS & REC. DIR. SUBJ: SUMMER CONCERT As you are aware, we have received funding from the San Diego Port District for our annual concert. This year, however, due to all the construction work on the Westside, I asked for and received permission to hold our concert at Kimball Park at 6 pm on August 6, 2000. In addition, I have been looking into getting new entertainment that would appeal to a wider segment of our community. With that in mind, I have come up with the following options for consideration: OPTION ONE Opening Act - Genero Humano. Gross over Rock band provides contemporary music in English and Spanish. They cover hits from artists such as Ricky Martin, The Doors, and Carlos Santana. Approximately a 30 minute performance. Headliner - B-SIDE PLAYERS. They feature Jazz, Reggae and Latin hits. They have performed up and down the West Coast and at Street Scene. 60 minute performance. In addition to the fact that the bands playing a combination of English and Latin music, radio station Magic 92.5 FM will be involved in marketing the program and provide on site support. OPTION TWO Would bring the San Diego Chamber Orchestra who have provided the music for the past few years. Their program choices would be - A. Rock Around The Clock. Featuring the music of the Beatles, Beach Boys, Billy Joel and Elvis. B. Big Band Fantasy. Featuring the music of Duke Ellington, Glen Miller, and Tommy Dorsey. Approximately a 75 minute performance. Recycled Paper MEETING DATE June 20, 2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 24 (-ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION — PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 38-UNIT MOTEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 8m STREET AND ROOSEVELT AVENUE. (APPLICANT: RAMAN V. PATEL) (CASE � FILE NO.: PD-1999-4) PREPARED BY Jon Cain - Associate PlanneAS�iPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The applicant proposes a three-story, 38-unit motel on a vacant lot located at the intersection of 7th Street and Roosevelt Avenue. The motel will be operated by a national chain known as "Microtel". The structure will have a stucco exterior finish and a red tile, hipped roof. The design of the structure includes gables over several windows, substantial variation in wall plane, and a tower over the stairwell, and complies with Design Guidelines. The project includes a swimming pool as required by Land Use Code requirements, and exceeds the minimum requirements for landscaping. The project complies with all Code requirements, and no variances are proposed. The Planning Commissioners discussed the potential for the motel to revitalize the area and utilize the good freeway access of the site, as well as the potential for the project to result in an overabundance of hotel rooms. Planning Commissioners also discussed the potential that the project could attract prostitution and other undesirable activity. The Commission ultimately voted to approve the project by a 3-1 margin, with three abstentions from Commissioners who were not present at the public hearing. Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A N/A Negative Declaration proposed (see Initial Study IS-1999-5) Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the decision of the Ping Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed. O D 6 COISSION R C MENDAT 0 Vote: Ayes —Parra, Godshalk, Baca Absent — Martinelli, Ungab, Valderrama ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 07-2000 2. Location Map aimed Development Permit. Nays - Detzer Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 07-2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 38-UNIT MO 1hL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 7m STREET AND ROOSEVELT AVENUE APPLICANT: RAMAN V. PATEL CASE FILE NO. PD-1999-4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Planned Development Permit application to allow a 38-unit motel at the northeast corner of 7th Street and National City Boulevard at a duly advertised public hearing held on May 1, 2000, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. PD-1999-4 and IS-1999-5, which is maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on May 1, 2000, support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the 23,958 square foot site exceeds the minimum 10,000 square foot lot size identified in City Codes for motel use, and since the project site plan includes parking, landscaping, and a pool to serve the use in compliance with City Code requirements. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the project is located on a collector street and nearby 8th Street is capable of handling the minimal increase in traffic that will be generated by the use. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the proposed motel complies with Design Guidelines and will be compatible with adjacent hotel/motel and commercial uses. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the proposed use is encouraged by the Tourist -Commercial Zoning of the property and is in the Motel -Planned Development Combining Zone area designed to allow for the development of this type of use. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration No. IS-1999-5, together with any comments received during the public review process, and finds on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, approves the Negative Declaration, and authorizes the filing of a Notice of Determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Planned Development Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Electrical, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations. 2. A drainage plan/grading plan showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off -site improvements shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer or other qualified professional, and shall be in accordance with City requirements. The plan shall show catch basins and proposed parking lot drainage along with all existing and proposed elevations. 3. All surface runoff, including landscaping adjoining the public right-of-way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities, and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface runoff that results from this development. 4. The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all proposed and existing irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way, and shall adjust the sprinkler heads so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk, or the streets. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner, its successors or assigns shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right- of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. 5. For P.V.C. irrigation lines in the public right-of-way, a metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of the lines. 6. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for Engineering Department review. The report shall address the stability of all existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure, and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. At a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2-inch A.C. over 4-inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 modified. 7. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be at least 6-inch in size with a clean -out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 8. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 9. The existing street improvements along property frontages shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers or other approved methods. 10. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the National City Engineering Department. 11. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and for grading construction on private property. 12. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvement, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. The requirements are for grading above 50 cubic yards. 13. All missing street improvements (i.e., curbs) shall be constructed and damaged portions of the sidewalk shall be replaced in accordance with City standards. Abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. 14. Before this Planned Development Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of Planned Development Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 15. Use authorized by this Planned Development Permit shall be limited to a motel in conformance with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-1999-4, dated Dec. 9, 1999. 16. Except as required by conditions of approval, plans for future permits shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-1999-4, dated Dec. 9, 1999. 17. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 18. A trash enclosure shall be provided in accordance with City standards. It shall have a stucco exterior finish to match the building. 19. The property owner shall submit a letter to the Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the Authority for any water facility improvements required for the proposed motel. 20. The perimeter wall shown on the plans shall have a stucco finish to match the building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of June 5, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: PARRA, GODSHALK, BACA NAYS: DETZER ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MARTINELLI, UNGAB, VALDERRAMA CHAIRMAN 9th STREET PROJECT SITE ®MIME® PROPOSED BUILDING — ZONE BOUNDARY SCALE: 1, = 200' NORTH 7th Street/National City Blvd. NATIONAL CITY LOCATION MAP 1 INITIAL PD-1999-4 IS-1999-5 HEARING: PLANNING 5/1/2000 DRN. DATE: 3/29/2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT June 20, 2000 MEETING DATE _ - - ITEMTITLE IL NOTICE OF DECISION -PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A COMMUNITY ROOM/LEARNING I/LEARNING CENTER 105 E. 11AND DSTREET (APPLICANT:DSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING YARDANCE FOR A REDUCED FRONT SETBACK AT 1 DEVELOPMENT CORP.) (CASE FILE NOS.: PD-2000-3 AND Z-2000-3) PREPARED BY Jon Cain - Associate Planned ART E T Planning 25 AGENDA ITEM NO. EXPLANATION center The applicant proposes the construction of a 2,080 square foot, two-story community room/learning and a 520 square foot, one-story leasing office at the northeast corner of Q Avenue and E. 16t Street. The property is at the entrance to the Paseo del Sol apartment complex on Q Avenue, and will serve the apartments, which are currently bei gthe renovated.apadThe bed proposed structures will have a stucco exterior and composition shingle roofing match ings. The variance is requested to reduce the front yard setback from twenty feet to seven feet for the leasing office that abuts Q Avenue. The variance is requested based on steep slopes on the property; there is a retaining wall varying from six to ten feet in height along much of the northern portion of the property. The Planning Commissioners voted to approve the project at the public hearing and incorporate conditions of approval that eliminate the need for other variances that had beenprops sedte regardingent in fa parking othe orout. hele was no public comment at the public hearing other than the applicant's order to expedite this CDC -subsidized project, this report has been prepared prior to Planning Commission adoption of the Resolution of approval, which is anticipated the day prior to the City Council meeting. Environmental Review NIA Categorical Exemption Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the anticipated approval of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission approved the Planned Development Permit. The final vote of the Planning Commission adopting the resolution will be stated at the council meeting. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Draft Planning Commission Resolution No. 10-2000 2. Location Map Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 10-2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A COMMUNITY ROOM/LEARNING CENTER AND LEASING OFFICE AND A VARIANCE FOR A REDUCED FRONT YARD SETBACK AT 1705 E. 16Th STREET. APPLICANT: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, COPPER HILLS APARTMENTS LTD. PARTNERSHIP CASE FILE NOS. PD-2000-3, Z-2000-3 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Planned Development Permit application for a community room/learning center and leasing office and a variance for a reduced front yard setback at 1705 E. 16th Street at a duly advertised public hearing held on June 5, 2000 at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File Nos. PD-2000-3 and Z-2000-3 which are maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on June 5, 2000, support the following findings: FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the lot has sufficient area to accommodate the proposed buildings. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the project involves the construction of small residential accessory structures that will complement existing development. The site is located on E. 16th Street, a collector street, and few vehicle trips are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since there is no change in use proposed and since conditions for the permit exist to ensure that the project will comply with Design Guidelines and be compatible with the residential character of the neighborhood. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the General Plan encourages projects that upgrade existing residential neighborhoods. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE ZONE VARIANCE 1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, location and surroundings, the strict application of Title 18 of the Municipal Code (Zoning) deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zone classification, since the steep slopes present on the lot limit the area of the property available for development. 2. That the requested variance is subject to such conditions which will assure that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated, since the project has been conditioned to comply with Design Guidelines and be compatible with the residential character of the neighborhood. 3. That the variance does not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zoning regulations governing the parcel of property, since an apartment leasing office and community room are residential accessory structures permitted in multiple -family residential zones. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Planned Development Permit and Variance are approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Electrical, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations. 2. All exit doors shall open in the direction of travel and be shown on the plans. 3. A drainage plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer or other qualified professional, and shall be in accordance with City requirements. 4. All surface runoff, including landscaping irrigation within the public right-of-way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities, and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface runoff resulting from this development. 5. The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all proposed and existing irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way. Sprinkler heads shall be adjusted so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk or the street. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner, its successors or assigns shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right-of-way at no cost to the City within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. 6. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for Engineering Department review. The report shall address the stability of all existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure, and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. At a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2-inch A.C. over 4-inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 with National City modifications. 7. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 8. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and for grading construction on private property. 9. Street improvements shall be in accordance with City standards. All missing street improvements shall be constructed, and abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. 10. Before this Planned Development Permit and Zone Variance shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit and Zone Variance. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Planned Development Permit and Zone Variance are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 11. Construction authorized by the Planned Development Permit for a leasing office and community room/learning center shall conform with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-2000- 3/Z-2000-3, dated May 24, 2000, except as modified by conditions of approval. 12. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 13. All standard parking spaces shall be a minimum of 19 feet deep, and wheel stops and hairpin striping shall be provided for parking spaces as required by the Land Use Code. 14. A hedge or wall shall be constructed at the east property line with at least five feet of landscaping separating the parking lot from the adjacent residential property to the east. 15. The two-way driveway serving the lot shall have a minimum width of 24 feet, and the drive aisle shall have a minimum width of 27 feet. 16. The handicap parking space shall be provided in the parking lot at the east end of the property and the area shown on the plans for handicap parking shall be replaced with landscaping. 17. The exterior finish types and colors for the structures shall match the remainder of the apartment complex. 18. The property shall utilize wrought -iron fencing in place of the chain -link fencing proposed. Fencing shall comply with the height limit for the zone of four feet in the front yard. 19. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan, including plant types, methods of planting, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant planting and water conserving irrigation devices. 20. The property owner shall submit a letter to the Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the Authority for any water facility improvements required for the proposed project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to th applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this. Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of June 19, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CHAIRMAN so 6 7 9 r 8 o h`"- Yvp T RS-2 t 9 I I i --.STREET--®- 3 RS-3-PD'ai66/4/o. ,,, 12 - 4 u RS-2 1432g,_I 14 fit% h M g RS-3-PD v1AP - 166 166 sao 20 IW 19 I /526 g II. p, ! 1229 b' gMe mi. ai �,ly 1.. lit y It t/ kl b; h MAP CG-PD RM1 -PD CG-PD /405 ISO /4A Isola /4/0 /4117 /436 11ese "140/ yr IS... 140.41 /42/ 6 /433 5 MAP CT-PD 166 110 16th as�o} eo4O S MAP /537 RM-2-PD a_ ISO- /543 w I SOTS Boo so n ae co ■1■----117th e-,---. 1765 as ' aa� raa es u as x•� RS-2 Sd MAP o ■ eso 1420 \ W F I ;/4/5 9 R-3-PD /5/0 /304 a /5/6 ;Oa /5/2 Q - n ea } A a � W 0 S 1507 le/7 9 ps•fe fs ss so U---STR-EET�-1 a0 00 so a1 A Nal• MN MINK MOM OM Milli aID to peg W a leo ao 60 If 0 A RM-1-PD g N ao ml eo\ m RS-2 L-STREET -----I RM-2-PD Yea sso a r I66 ur— 166 BB L_.18th - -- "Mr ®--:--STREET---- MUM". ■Ir. PROJECT SITE -- ZONE BOUNDARY SCALE: 1"=200' NORTH LOCATION MAP 1705 E. 16th Street PD-2000-3 Z-2000-3 DRN. DATE: 5/22/2000 INITIAL HEARING NATIONAL CITY PLANNING 6/5/00 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT June 20, 2000 MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 26 ITEM TITLETEMPORARY USE PERMIT - NATIONAL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TASTE OF NATIONAL CITY PREPARED BY EXPLANATION This is a request from the National City Chamber of Commerce to conduct its annual "Taste of National City" fund-raising event on A Avenue from 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 23, 2000. The event is open to the community for sampling food from various restaurants in the City. This also includes a request to close the 900 block of A Avenue for the event. A waiver of fees is requested. The event and sponsoring organization meet the criteria in the City Council Policy No. 704 for a waiver of fees. Kathleen Trees, Acting DiDctPor ARTMENT Building and Safety Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The City has incurred $1,331.20 in costs: $345 for processing the T.U.P. through various City departments, $986.20. for Public Works. Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of • approval and grant the request for a waiver of the fees. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended Conditions of Approval. a\tastenc.doc A-200 (9/80) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: National City Chamber of Commerce EVENT: Taste of National City DATE OF EVENT: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 TIME OF EVENT: 10:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. APPROVALS: PLANNING FIRE FINANCE PUBLIC WORKS POLICE ENGINEERING CITY ATTORNEY RISK MANAGER (SAN DIEGO COUNTY NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] YES [ x] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED) YES [x] YES[x] YES [x] YES [x] YES [x] CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ENGINEERING 1. Call Engineering department at least 72 hours prior to the event for any necessary coordination with contractors, in the event of a construction site in the vicinity of the activity. Contact Adam Landa at 336-4394. CITY ATTORNEY 1. Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement and a policy of general liability insurance with the City and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with amount of coverage to be determined by the Risk Manager. RISK MANAGER 1. Provide minimum limits of one million dollars per occurrence of general liability insurance, including product liability coverage. 2. Name the City of National City and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds on all policies. 3. Execute standard hold harmless. Continued.. NC Chamber Taste NC Page 2 FIRE 336-4550 1. No permit required for a 10X10 canopy, maintain clear Fire Department access at all times. PUBLIC WORKS 336-4580 1. Public Works will sweep and barricade the street at 8 a.m. on 8/23/00 and will pick up barricades from corners on 8/24/00. City custodial staff to load chairs and assist. City electrical to set up generator. The tables/chairs and generator support is $782.56, plus equipment rental. Generator is $203.64. Total cost of Public Works support is $986.20. FINANCE 1. A business license is required if monies are solicited, admittance charged or food, beverages or ' merchandise is sold. Each separate vendor must have a separate business license. 2. Vendors currently licensed by the City may operate on their existing license. If any of the vendors or organizations are registered not -for -profit there will not be a charge for their business license. 3. A list of all participating vendors (with their address, phone number and current National City business license number) is to be submitted to Clad Revenue and Recovery Division of the Fiance Department prior to the event for verification of business license numbers. POLICE 1. Police Department will attempt to have police reserves and police explorers provide security for the event. a\tastenc.doc City of National City Building & Safety Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 Application For A Temporary Use Permit Application is hereby made for a temporary use permit pursuant to the provision of the National City Municipal Code 15.60 and as described below. Temporary Use Permits (TUP) are ministerial administrative regulations intended to provide orderly and effective management of specific list of temporary land uses having exceptional characteristics requiring their review and limitations. Any permit applicant may appeal the action of the Building Official pursuant to Municipal Code section 15.60.045. Class A & B use Application for a Temporary use permit must be filed 15 working days prior to the commencement of the activity/event. Activities/events involving the use or areas of operation within the state highway jurisdiction shall be filed not less than six (6) months prior to the requested activity/event. Please Complete: (Print or Type) Sponsoring Organization(s): National City Chamber of Commerce Organization Address: 711 "A" Avenue hone: City: National City State: CA ZiP:91950-2228 P619) 477-9339 Location of Event: Heritage Square - 900 Block of A"A Avenue - National = • s Dates(s) Requested for Event: Wednesday. August 23. 2000 AM/PM Hours of Use on Day of Event: From: 10 : 00 A ,Mt AM/PM To: 9 : 00 P P. M . First Day: Setup - Date:8/23/00 Time:10:00 M Teardown-Date:B/2gtoo Time:g:00�j Last Day: Setup -Date: N /A Time: N/A AM PM Teardown - Date:N /A Time: N /A A Brief Description of Event (A summary of the event may be attached to the application):The Taste of National City, open to Community for sampling of restaurants in the City by the public. Name of Person Responsible For The Event Who Will Be On -Site The Day Of The Event: Edith Hughes & Janice Martine li How May This Person Be Contacted? Edith Hughes 477-9339 / Janice Martinelli 474-8905 Specific Use Request: City Promotional Event. Request the Use of 65 rectanguler tablees/150 chair City hair./to Justification:The Chamber will have volunted"s to set up & take down equipment. X Request to Sell or Serve Alcohol Beverages: Yes [ ] No [ ] Will Food/Drinks Be Sold: Yes [ ] No [X ] Note: The City Council will not approve the sale or consumption of alcohol in City parks in conjunction with any event requiring a TUP. This prohibition will not impact the existing policy regarding the sale or consumption of alcohol within buildings in the parks, such as the Community Center, which will continue to be subject to the approval of the City Council. Will Tents or Canopies be Used?: Yes [ X ] No [ ] If"Yes," permit may be required from Fire Department Waiver of Fees Requested: Yes [ X ] No [ ] If "Yes," complete attached supplemental questionnaire form Facilities (When Applicable — Request Assistance with the Following) Noise, Crowd, Traffic Control: Security Control: Police Reserves (6) Parking/Barricades: Barricades 900 Block of "A" Avenue - Parking at Union Bank of California Exterior Lighting/Electrical: Street lights Trash Disposal/Site Clean-up After Event: The Chamber will provide and coordinate . Sanitary Facilities: 2 Port -a -pots provided by the Chamber of Commerce Name of Applicant: National City Chamber of Commerce - Edith Hughes, Chief Executive Officer Address: 711 "A" Avenue Na tonal City CA 91950-2228 Phone: (619) 477-9339 Signature of Applicant: gzeix4. Date: May 17, 2000 This Form Becomes A Permit When Endorsed By The Building & Safety Director (over) For Office Use Only Permit Fees: Permit No: Use Group: Use Class: Bond: Permit Exp.Date: Specific Stipulations/Comments: Approvals/Stipulations (Check where Applicable): Initial Date PLANNING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS ' FINANCE POLICE PARKS & REC. ENGINEERING CITY ATTORNEY RISK MANAGER COMMUNITY DEV. OTHER Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ Yes [ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date City Council Meeting Date: Temporary Use Permit: Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Waiver of Fees: Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Property Notification Required: Yes [ ] No [ ] Comments: Date: City of National City Building and Safety Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950-4397 (619) 336-4210 Fax (619) 336-4337 Temporary Use Permit Fee Waiver Request Supplemental Questionnaire City Council Policy No. 704 contains the criteria for granting waivers of TUP processing fees by the City Council. This Supplemental Questionnaire will be used to evaluate whether the event or sponsoring organization for a TUP meets the criteria for a fee waiver. Accordingly, please answer all questions fully and completely. City Council Policy No. 704 The City Council shall waive TUP processing fees only in the case of a non-profit organization, and when such organization can demonstrate that the event for which the TUP is requested will not generate any income to the organization, or that the net proceeds of the event for which the TUP is requested result in: Direct financial benefit to an individual who resides or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family; or Direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax; or Direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club, etc.; or Direct fmancial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of City or Community Development Block Grants (CDBG) funding. Please Fully and Completely Answer the Following: ® Is the event for which the TUP is sought sponsored by a non-profit organization? X Yes (Please proceed to the next question) No (Please sign the bottom of this form and submit this form with the TUP Application to the Building & Safety Department) • Please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the TUP is sought and then proceed to the next question. Name of Sponsoring Organization: National City Chamber of Commerce Type of Organization: Chamber of Commerce (Service Club, Church, Social Service Agency, etc.) a. Will the event generate net income or proceeds to the sponsoring organization? X Yes (Please proceed to the next question) No (Please sign the bottom of this form and submit this form with the TUP Application to the Building & Safety Department) o Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details in the space provided below) X No (Please proceed to the next question) ® Recycled Paper If Yes, please explain who is to benefit from the proceeds and the general nature of the fmancial hardship. • Will the event provide a direct fmancial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details in the space provided below) X No (Please proceed to the next question) • Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? X Yes (Please provide an explanation and details in the space provided below) No (Please proceed to the next question) Fund -Raiser for the National City Chamber of Commerce • Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details in the space provided below) X No (Please sign the bottom of this form and submit with the TUP Application to the Building & Safety Department) If Yes, please state the year the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds were received and how those funds were used: Year funds were received: Funds were used to: May 17, 2000 Signature / Date CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization National City Chamber of Commerce Person in charge of activity Edith Hughes, Chief Executive Officer Address 711 "A" Avenue - National City, CA 91950-2228 Telphone (619) 477-9339 Date(s) of use Wednesday, August 23, 2000 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned hereby agree(s) to hold the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City harmless and indemnify the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation and liability arising out of or related to the use of public property by permittee or permitee's agents-; employees or contractors. Signature p o plicant Chief Executive Officer May 17, 2000 Official Title Date (For Office Use Only) Certificate of Insurance approved 198712 MEETING DATE / / ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - BEAUDRY R.V. PARKING LOT SALE AND SHOW City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT June 20, 2000 PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Kathleen Trees, ActingDirector EXPLANATION AGENDA ITEM NO. 27 Building and Safety This is a request from Beaudry R.V. to conduct a recreational vehicle sale on parking lot 2 at the Plaza Bonita Shopping Center, from Friday, July 7 through Sunday, July 16, 2000. The hours of the sale are 8:30 a.m. to 8 p.m. Any sales tax collected as a result of this sale is allocated to National City. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The City has incurred $115.00 in costs in processing this Temporary Use Permit application. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended conditions of approval. A-200 (9/80) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: Beaudry R.V. EVENT: Beaudry R.V. Sale and Show DATE OF EVENT: Friday, July 7, 2000 — Sunday, July 18,2000 TIME OF EVENT: 8:30 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. APPROVALS: PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE COMMENTS [ ] FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE COMMENTS. [ x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE COMMENTS [ x ] SPECIFIC CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FIRE 336-4550 1. Exit ways to be maintained in an unobstructed manner at all times. Exit ways to be clear of all obstruction for its entire width and length. 2. Fire extinguishers shall be on premises, type 2-A:10-BC. Travel distance not to exceed seventy five (75) feet. 3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided and maintained at all times. 4. Fire hydrants shall not be blocked or obstructed. 5. Plot plan required. Plan to reflect display layout, exitways, fire access points, etc. FINANCE 336-4260 Any sales tax collected as a result of this sale must be allocated to National City. When filing the quarterly return with the State -Board of Equalization. A copy of the notice that is sent to the State - Board of Equalization is to be submitted to the Finance Department. A current business license must be on file in the Revenue & Recovery Division of the Finance Department for each vendor participating. (The Credit Union does not need a business license.) 8AY-08-00 NON 04119 PN BEAUDRY R.V, _--• aackyiaa(u „•.61S3364377 FAH 1'iO, 17807446003 P. 03 CITY OF NATIONAL CTY PAGE CO. ha1.361t6.13000 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING & SAFETY 1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD., NATIONAL CITY, CA 91050 APPLJCATION FOR A TEMPQRARy USE PERMIT APPLICATION IS HEREBY MAD FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION OF THE NATIONAL. CITY MUNICIPAL CODE 1.5.60 AND AS DESCRIBED BELOW, Temporary Use Permits are ministerial administrative regulations intended to provide orderly and effective management of specific list of temporary land uses have exceptional oharecterietics requiring their review and limitations. Any permit applicant may appeal the action of the Building Official pursuant to Municipal Coda section 15,G0.045• Claaa A & S use Application for a Temporary Use Permit must be filed IS working 4.0. prtor to the commencement of the activitylevent. Andy" i -• 1ta Involving the use or areas of operation within the state highway jurisdiction shall be filed not less than siu (6) month prierto the requested activity/event SPONSORING ORGANIZATTON(s): 13E'4Th 1 ORt5ANI(('��''rr,T1ONA DRESS. is' f v�`S �g/�y t31r ,+�.'t✓�' i ILL- (Q"r74 Wee chi LOCATION OF EVtn I: PHONE: --Rh ar-52 -- OATE(S) REQUESTED I'OR EVENT: FROM HOURS OF USE ON DAY OF EVENT•. FROM (OEGmNsonde ) PATE • ...TWO (4EGIAI rafitaam DATETl)14E BRIEF DESORIPTION OF EVENT- (� 1// TO l�/Y 0 cp, P.M. TO V AM. / A•M./P.M. - (END BE:LODATE TIME,�_A.M.rP.M. ._A.M./P.M.-(ENO IEASUQ,IIiEQDATE ,_ TIME A.M./P.M. (A b: •. • ''' of the crier/Vela], he requasied. A smote/ of the event abnvity maybe aneehed to the appfrcaoon) NAME F PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THE EVENT, WHO WILL. BE ON-Stit THE DAY OF THE V NT: -ak9.evL ! vit/'jirS HOW MAY THIS PERSON SE CON fACTED? ?PO .Sete 6-7 LIZ SPECIFIC USE REQUEST: JUSTIFICATION .. REOUEET TO,iELI. OR EYt ALGOIIOL BEVERAGES: YES[ ] NO[✓)✓IMLL FQODI DRINK BE SOLD: YES( ] NG(c-1" {Nate.: 'T(t City council will not approve Inc swo or consumption of eicohot in City parks in conjunction with any event requiring a T.U.P. This pronlbfl<on wit net Impact the existing porky regarding the sole or consumption of alcohol within boddings /n ills packs, such as the Community Canter, which wilt continue to be subject to t e approval of the City Courted.) WILL TENTS OR CANOPIES BE USED?: YES I [ NO [ (ir "YE5,', permit maybe required anm Fire Department WAIVER OF FEES REQUESTED: YES ( ] NO j (U-YES,•comp(ate attached supplemental gvestiorrnabn form) FACILITIES_ (When App/isaota) REQUEST ASSISTANCE WITH THE rOLLOW)NG: HO1F I"^OWD,TRAFFIC CONTROL. SECURITY CONTROL' PARKING/BARRICADES' EXTERIOR LIGHTING/ELECTRICAL TRASH DISPOSAL/SITE CLEAN-UP AFTER EVENT. SANITARY FACILITIES: MAY -OE -CO NOR 0420 PM BEAUCRY R. V. FAX NO, 17007446003 ,= 13:4S E1933E43377 CITY Cr NATIONAL CTY P. 04 PAGE [12 PROPERTY NO1IlCATION REQUIRED: YES [ ] EI. 4g.COME LTE (Pent or r00) NAME OE APPUCANT: t f f � �yep•S ADDRESS: _.. ! f t'RVerteee.1 Wf SIGFIATUR£ Or= .,. r PHONE: -._ d Sb 3-WIZ DATE: S r Z f 0 0 (THIS FORM BECOMES A PERMIT WHEN ENDORSED BY THE BUILDING & SAFETY DIRECTOR, PERMIT FEE£: PERMITNO.: USE GROUP: USE CLASS: - - -, BONb PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: EMIFI0.imuLanousim f�,'gto: • SEEEI2 1,11.E71i'L]6LMOHE (frock Wher&APP/kaula): S' ,•,", PLANNING - YES [NO [ ] SEES'EIP ( J (RECENED DATE STAMP) -- FIRE YES ( ] NO l 1 SEE STIP [ PUBLIC WORKS `-'E� YES [ I NO ( I SEE STIP ( ] FINANCE YES [ ] NO ( ] SEE STIP [ ] LOAN POLICE YES ( ] NO [ ] SEE STIP ( ] --- PARKS & RED, YES [ ] NO ( ] SEE STIP ( ] -- _` ENGINEERING YEE ( ) NO [ I SEE STIP [ ) O41a�� �._ Eft}' ATTORNEY YES ( J NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ) RISK MANAGER YES [ ] - NO ( ) SEE STIP (r ] • -• COMMUNITY DEVELOP. YES [ ] NO ( ) EEESt1) I ) PMa y OTHER _ YES [ ] NO [ ] SEC- STIP [ ) CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: (EmprIRARY USE PERMIT: APPROVED [) DENIED I J WAIVER OP FEES: APPROVED [ J DENIED [ ] NO[ ] CISMMENi5; DATE MAY-08-00 MON 0418 PM BEAUDRY R.V. OW020.01.1(1 13;0 61933t4iitt FAX NO, 17607446003 P. 02 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property. facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of S1,000.000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City. Its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. `/ Organization g__V_' 2- + A L� Person In charge of activity RGS r MYER.S. Address 2 i rYr /i/.64.L4--S ' Will S0142 4A' I J T'olphone g C LIL(' Oates) of use HQLR HARMLESS AGRFFMENJ The undersigned hereby agree(s) to hold the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City Harmless and indemnify the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City from and against all claims, domandsr costs. losses. damage. injuries. litigation and liability arising out of or related to the u<o of public property by pernittee or permitee's agents, employees or Contractors. Signature or App icant Official Title ..S":1z/a Otte —_ .0 rYi_i:a-:T'dron.s.MW atafWa.wwwww WiM ........ ...............mwi�me (Fox: Officc i)g6 Only) -'rtlflcate of Insurance approved