Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000 08-01 CC AGENDA PKTJ AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CIVIC CENTER 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY — AUGUST 1, 2000 - 3:00 P.M. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY CITY MANAGER, TOM G. MCCABE INVOCATION APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 25, 2000 INTERVIEWS/APPOINTMENTS — BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS Boards and Commissions - Interviews Senior Citizens Advisory Board - Appointments COUNCIL AGENDA 8/1/00 PAGE 2 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing regarding levy of assessments for costs of maintenance — Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (LMD) — "Mile of Cars" (Community Development Commission) ** Refer to Agenda Item # 14 ** 2. Public Hearing regarding a Community Development Commission (CDC) sale of land to Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SoCal). (Community Development Commission) ** Refer to Agenda Item # 15 ** CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. 3. Resolution No. 2000-88 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City selecting annual adjustment factors for use in establishing the annual appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2000-2001. (Finance) 4. Resolution No. 2000-89 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City establishing the annual appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2000-2001. (Finance) 5. Resolution No. 2000-90 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an Amendment to the Agreement between the City of National City and the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District to provide fire protection and emergency medical services. (Fire) COUNCIL AGENDA 8/1/00 PAGE 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) 6. Resolution No. 2000-91 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the purchase of a Diagnostic Engine Analyzer from Snap-On Industrial. (Purchasing) 7. Resolution No. 2000-92 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing a sole source purchase of Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus equipment from `Special T Fire Equipment." (Purchasing) 8. Resolution No. 2000-93 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a Planned Development Permit for a 38-unit motel at the northeast corner of 7th Street and Roosevelt Avenue. (Applicant: Raman V. Patel) (Case File No. PD-1994-4) (Planning) 9. Resolution No. 2000-94 A Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an Agreement with the City of Chula Vista for disposal of household hazardous waste. (Public Works) 10. WARRANT REGISTER NO. 04 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $534,296.44 11. Consolidated Cash and Investment Report as of June 30, 2000. (Finance) 12. Claim for Damages: Art Flores. (City Clerk) 13. Claim for Damages: Lucila Perez. (City Clerk) COUNCIL AGENDA 8/1/00 PAGE 4 NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS 14. Resolution No. 2000- Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City confirming the diagram and assessment and providing for the levy of the annual assessment in a special maintenance district (Mile of Cars). (Community Development Commission) ** Refer to Agenda Item #1 ** 15. Resolution No. 2000- Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a Community Development Commission (CDC) sale of land to Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SoCal). (Community Development Commission) ** Refer to Agenda Item #2 ** NEW BUSINESS 16. Notice of Decision — Conditional Use Permit to allow a wireless communications facility at 111 W. 9th Street. (Applicant: Tim Kolset) (Case File No. CUP-2000-9) (Planning) 17. Notice of Decision — Denial of a Conditional Use Permit and Variance to expand a motel from 39 to 50 rooms without the required swimming pool at 1125 E. Plaza Blvd. (Applicant: Tsan-Tang Hung) (Case File No. CUP-2000-13, Z-2000-4). (Planning) 18. Notice of Decision — Conditional Use Permit to allow adult school classrooms at 300 E. 15th Street. (Applicant: National City Adult School) (Case File No. CUP-2000-17) (Planning) 19. MTDB (Metropolitan Transit Development Board) Transit Financing and Proposed Funding Consolidation. (National City Transit) 20. National City Community Concert Band Proposal. (City Manager) COUNCIL AGENDA 8/1/00 PAGE 5 NEW BUSINESS (cont.) 21. Formation of a 2000 Council Fee Committee. (Building & Safety) 22. Temporary Use Permit — McCune -Chrysler -Plymouth -Jeep Used Vehicle Tent Sale. (Building & Safety) 23. Temporary Use Permit — St. Mary's Parish Annual Fund Raising. (Building & Safety) 24. Temporary Use Permit — Circuit City Stores Sound Competition. (Building and Safety) -� CITY MANAGER -� CITY ATTORNEY -* OTHER STAFF -> MAYOR CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL AGENDA 8/1/00 PAGE 6 NEW BUSINESS (cont.) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. ADJOURNMENT Next Regular City Council Meeting - August 8, 2000, at 6:00 p.m. — Council Chambers, Civic Center TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor July 3, 2000 Ms. Marie Clifton 1037 E. 16th Street National City, CA 91950 Dear Ms. Clifton: This letter is to notify you that in order to be considered for appointment to one of our City's Boards and Commissions, you are required by City policy to appear before the City Council for an interview. You are, therefore, requested to appear for consideration for appointment at our Council meeting on Tuesday, August 1, 2000 at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. If you are unable to attend, please contact my office immediately. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, GEORGE H. WATERS MAYOR GHW:nu ® Recycled Paper Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor July 3, 2000 Ms. Lucille Delorme 2111 "0" Avenue National City, CA 91950 Dear Ms. Delorme: This letter is to notify you that in order to be considered for appointment to one of our City's Boards and Commissions, you are required by City policy to appear before the City Council for an interview. You are, therefore, requested to appear for consideration for appointment at our Council meeting on Tuesday, August 1, 2000 at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. If you are unable to attend, please contact my office immediately. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, GEORE H. WATERS MAYOR GHW:nu ® Recycled Paper Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor J U LY 17, 2000 TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MAYOR GEORGE H. WATERS SUBJECT: SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD Ms. Helen Murphy's term on the Senior Citizens Advisory Board of Trustees will be expiring on August 31, 2000. Ms. Murphy has served one term and is requesting consideration for reappointment. If there are no objections, I recommend we reappoint Ms. Murphy to the Senior Citizens Advisory Board for a term ending August 31, 2002. This item will be placed on the Council Agenda for the meeting of August 1, 2000. GEOR E H. WATERS Mayor GHW:nu ® Recycled Paper Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor JULY 13, 2000 TO: COUNCILMEMBERS FROM: MAYOR GEORGE H. WATERS SUBJECT: SENIOR CITIZENS ADVISORY BOARD Please be advised that Louise Barchus term on the Senior Citizens Advisory Board of Trustees will be expiring on August 31, 2000. Ms. Barchus has served faithfully since 1979 on the Senior Citizens Advisory Board and is requesting consideration for reappointment. If there are no objections, I recommend we reappoint Ms. Barchus to the Senior Citizens Advisory Board for a term ending August 31, 2002. This item will be placed on the Council Agenda for the meeting of August 1, 2000. �.L GEOR H. WATERS Mayor GHW:nu 0 Recycled Paper ** REFER TO AGENDA ITEM #14 ** City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 7-ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING LEVY OF ASSESSMENTS FOR COSTS OF MAINTENANCE — LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (LMD) — "MILE OF CARS" PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Paul Desrochers"PARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Executive Director COMMISSION (CDC) This is the final public hearing relative to the levy and collection of assessments for costs of maintenance to the LMD. A public meeting was held on July 28, 2000 in these council chambers for the purpose of informing the proposed assesses of the cost and how the cost was divided amongst all property owners in the LMD. Attached to this report is the ORDER OF PROCEDURE for the public hearing. Environmental Review Financial Statement Maintenance costs for fiscal year 2000-01 operation of the LMD are estimated at $99,600; and, fees to the property owners range from $345 to $6,805. X N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Conduct the public hearing per ORDER OF PROCEDURE. BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Public Hearing Notice Resolution No. A-200 (9180) ORDER OF PROCEDURE August 1,2000 Explanation: The following general outline sets froth an Order of Procedure for the public meeting relating to the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD). The Mayor will announce that this is a Public Hearing relative to the levy and collection of assessments for costs of maintenance and improvements to the LMD. The City Clerk will make a statement that notice has been given in the manner and form as required by law; a Certificate of Compliance is on file and open for public inspection; and, public notice was provided. The Community Development Commission Director will provide an oral report on the proposed purpose and scope, the boundaries of the LMD, the Engineer's Report, assessment spread, and number of protests received to date (% of assessed area) and announce that copies have been delivered to each member of the legislative body. The Mayor will ask each speaker to identify themselves and their property and to provide their comments in the following order: Firstly, those who are in opposition to the (a) extent of maintenance work to be done; and (b) method of assessment spread. Secondly, ask to hear from anyone in favor of the proceedings. City Council will provide any discussion over the proceedings, if any. The Mayor will close the public hearing and the City Council can now consider taking action on the item. PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C.P) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County, of San Diego: I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the county aforesaid; I am over the age of eighteen years, and not a party to or interested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of THE STAR NEWS, a newspaper of general circulation, published ONCE WEEKLY in the city of National City and the South Bay Judicial District, county of San Diego, which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of San Diego, State of California, under the date of April 23, 1951, Case Number 182529; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on the following dates, to -wit: 7/14 all in the year 2000 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at Chula Vista, California 91910 this 14th day ;�� 000. Signa re PRINCIPLE CLERK This space is for the County Clerk's filing stamp • Rtiou NCI ttot tHE f�TYobF,�lN1,;1'ri`Clnr II! ttnd" TifIttz hits been ?lid a PNW AAsssess' m •Engine s Hie port (Report"), -.Ye, required the the 1997721and Article : IIlD'`to1Mthe CCoattituti _ Ar k•; CO • k tind Cou j' ij OE FON?AN'A N DLEYY: AND COL`LECt1 OP, r '� tl$SM yt '(ANO tET):NIG ST AMMO hLAMFOR PUBLIC M :EMS AND PUBLIC HEARING THEREON WHEREAS, the- City Cduncil -of the CIty = of National City has previous- ly formed a spedal malpte- nance'district porsuantlo the terms of the "Land soaping and. Lighting Act of 1972," being Division 15, Part2 of the St7of , and Highways Code the StA}R o Cal , the 972`Ac '1maintii.'r,�,,�Wh' ;41..ske"ri 1 1aeLain7, «.:.: is. t'thWllfne : triodt'%'�a"" r l aril videl vide e fdrthfil Imp°� recitals Inter€ t - onof le to levyan menu to 1,_,� UL? i!au cos f1L..I,„, wit : �lullll..0 x.ti'1.J Moline ImproveinS'nt1:. Q6 rally descdtieil190g§ E hibIt A dl t norm' I and In rated'fi rein by this reference. 1 TRIG on. 3:.;Th said wblkstofliinp` . nt are speckgif Jy b�r�ithleartothe oun- de oUa1d Maintenance Diet iCVl lotithobel. Metlative ;ille. tod t works=of afld'for par: to tee bouts yl as this l body,' Iwpyrof edith Is'ohrfGe in the:Oflke:o€the dty:Ckrk ? end pdesignlatedf by the ' ' name tott. this. 1.. Aillintefiarti District. Gbrl 4i a[ the lie- - QftTa ot,1he f Engkreer,' 1a1,s,I '; Is on. Sid `thbit intenLac'tDistrict 'end any-mnes thmaln. and Pr +igastmedts s!Iots tmd:.. airdtwltlrlw tthe ar , ;11 r iltryr rro 7a:5: fia �Lp iiftN1IC ON OWING DATES IrUBLf �I Noi i10 The star -News Pege 27 c ** REFER TO AGENDA ITEM #15 ** City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT August 1, 2000 MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (-ITEM _ I SSION (CDC) SALE OF LAND TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SOCAL). v .I' Paul Desroch PREPARED BY Executive Directo ARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (CDC) EXPLANATION This is a public hearing regarding the proposed sale of CDC owned land, assessor parcel number 557-440-56, to SoCal in accordance with an approved development plan. This is the time and the place set for the public hearing. A copy of the Notice of Public Hearing is attached hereto. Order of Procedure: • Open Public Hearing; • take public testimony; • close public hearing. For action, please refer to resolution. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Per the approved Disposition and Development Agreement, the CDC will provide the land for one - dollar ($1.00) cost and SoCal will construct parking, fencing and landscaping. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Report pertaining to the sales transaction of property located in the fourteen hundred (1400) block between Sheryl Lane and "Q" Avenue. 2. Notice of Public Hearing A-200 (9/80 REPORT PERTAINING TO 1111. SALES TRANSACTION OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE FOURTEEN HUNDRED BLOCK BETWEEN SHERYL LANE AND Q AVE. This property lies west of Sheryl Lane and east of (behind) a row of apartment buildings on the east side of Q Avenue in National City, Ca. A large storm drain runs through the site running in an east -west direction and a north -south direction. The parcel contains approximately 32,795 square feet, however it is land locked except to adjacent parcels. The zoning is CT (tourist commercial). In 1993 the property was purchased by the Community Development Commission (CDC) as surplus property from the City of National City and transferred by Quitclaim Deed. In approximately 1995 the CDC proposed the development of a series of large duplex units on subject site. However, the neighborhood residents strongly opposed anything but single-family ownership type housing. The site has not been marketable because of adverse noise, steep topography, and location. A recent appraisal identifies the highest and best use is to merge the property with adjacent properties. The appraised value is $1.10 per square foot for a total of $40,500. It is the purpose of this sale to transfer the property to Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SoCal) for one dollar ($1.00). SoCal will utilize the property in accordance with the CDC approved Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) which calls for the development of parking and ancillary uses for the area. The DDA requires the removal of some parking in front of the apartments facing Q Avenue in order to redesign the street. SoCal is willing to replace and add parking on subject land with CDC's participation being the land value. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of National City will hold a public hearing at a regular Council meeting at or shortly after the hour of 3:00 p.m., Tuesday, August 1, 2000, in the City Council Chambers, Civic Center, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City: TO PROVIDE FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 33433 OF THE STATE HEALTH & SAFETY CODE, REGARDING THE PROPOSED TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR THE SALE OF LAND OWNED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AND LOCATED EAST OF Q AVENUE BEHIND APARTMENT BUILDINGS. SAID LAND, CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 36,795 SQ. FT., IS PROPOSED TO BE SOLD TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION FOR ANCILLARY USES TO THE REHABILITATION OF HOUSING UNITS ON Q AVENUE A copy of thReport Pertaining to the Sale of Real Property is on file for public review atthe Community Development Commission office, 140 E. 12th Street, Suite B, National City, California, 91950. Anyone interested in this matter may appear at the above time and place and be heard. If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the undersigned, or to the City Council of the City of National City at, or prior to, the public hearing. DATED: JULY 20, 2000 Michael R. Dalla City Clerk, City of National City MEETING DATE 8/1 /00 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY SELECTING ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR USE IN ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001. PREPARED BY EXPLANATION J.Gonzales DEPARTMENT Finance As allowed by Proposition 111, the growth in California per capita income was chosen as the City's change in cost of living adjustment. In addition, the population growth of San Diego County was chosen as the population adjustment factor. Environmental Review N/A (Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director Selected factors provide the highest Appropriations Limit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. >ATTACIHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Proposed Resolution Account No. Resolution No. A-200 i9.99: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 — 88 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY SELECTING ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS FOR USE IN ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1979, added Article XIII-B to the California Constitution placing various limitations on the appropriations of the State and local governments; and WHEREAS, Article XIII-B of the California Constitution provides that appropriations made by State and local governments shall be changed annually by a factor comprised of the change in population and the change in the cost of living; and WHEREAS, the voters of California on June 5, 1990, enacted Proposition 111 updating the calculation of appropriations limit of the State and local governments; and WHEREAS, Proposition 111 further provides that for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 1990, the appropriations limit of each entity of government shall be the appropriations limit for the fiscal year 1986-87 adjusted for the changes made from that fiscal year; and WHEREAS, Proposition 111 further provides that for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 1990, each city may choose as its change in cost of living adjustment factor either (1) the growth in California per capita income, or (2) the growth in the non-residential assessed valuation due to new construction within the city; and WHEREAS, Proposition 111 further provides that for fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 1990, each city may choose as its change in population adjustment factor either (1) the population growth of the city, or (2) the population growth of the entire county. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that for fiscal year 2000-2001 the change in cost of living adjustment factor shall be the growth in California per capita income. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that for fiscal year 2000-2001, the change in population adjustment factor shall be the population growth of San Diego County. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1s` day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla George H. Eiser, III City Clerk City Attorney ,iAEETING DATE 8/1/00 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO, 4 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION THE ANNUAL PREPARED BY EXPLANATION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ESTABLISHING APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 DEPARTMENT Finance J.Gonzales The Annual Appropriations Limit for fiscal year 2000-2001 has been calculated as $28,200,688. The estimated appropriations for 2000-2001 subject to the limit is $21,898,724. The City is under the Annual Appropriations Limit by $6,232,946. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement No effect since Approved Bya Finance Director estimated appropriations are under the limit. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Proposed Resolution Account No. Resolution No. A-200 19. 99 RESOLUTION NO. 2000 — 89 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2000-2001 WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1979, added Article XIII-B to the California Constitution placing various limitations on the appropriations of the State and local governments; and WHEREAS, Article XHI-B of the California Constitution provides that appropriations made by State and local governments shall be changed annually by a factor comprised of the change in population and the change in the cost of living; and WHEREAS, the voters of California on June 5, 1990, enacted Proposition 111 updating the calculation of appropriations limit of the State and local governments; and WHEREAS, the calculations for the appropriations limit of the City of National City for fiscal year 2000-2001 are shown on Attachment 1 attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the cost of living factor to be used in calculating the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2000-2001 shall be as set forth in Attachment 1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the population change factor to be used in calculating the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2000-2001 shall be as set forth in Attachment 1. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the appropriations limit for fiscal year 2000- 2001 shall be $28,200,688 as set forth in Attachment 1. PASSED and ADOPTED 14 day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla George H. Eiser, III City Clerk City Attorney Resolution No. 2000-89 City of National City Gann Appropriations Limit 2000-2001 Schedule A Attachment 1 Appropriations Limit - 1999-2000 $ 26,315,065 CA Per Capita Income Increase (A) 4.91% Limit Sub -Total ($26,315,065 x 1.0491) $ 27,607,135 SD County Population Increase (A) 2.15% Appropriations Limit - 2000-2001 ($27,607,135 x 1.0215) $ 28,200,688 (A) Source - State of California, Department of Finance City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AEETING DATE 08/01/00 ITEM TITLE AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY EXTENDING THE FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE LOWER SWEETWATER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Walter Amedee, i PREPARED BY Management Analyst II DEPARTMENT EXPLANATION Fire The National City Fire Department has provided fire protection services to the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District since March 1982. In 1998, the Fire District proposed that the annual service fee be based on increases in the "Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers" (CPI), for the San Diego metropolitan area according to the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Statistics. Costs for providing these services are fully recovered, but are re-evaluated once within the two (2) year term to ensure that full cost recovery is occurring. The term of the current Fire Protection Services Agreement must be extended as said Agreement will expire on September 30, 2000. Due to the ongoing studies concerning annexation of Lower Sweetwater, it is recommended that the term of this Agreement be extended for a period of two (2) years from October 1, 2000 - October 1, 2002, with one adjustment occurring on October 1, 2001 as determined by any increases in the CPI. The current quarterly total of $32,787.35 will be adjusted as of October 1, 2000, based upon the percent of any increases in the CPI during the period of June 30, 1999 - June 30, 2000. The adjusted quarterly payment shall be in effect from October 1, 2000 - October 1, 2001. Either party may cancel this Agreement by providing a six (6) month notice of intent to terminate. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement All costs associated with providing these services are fully recovered. Approved By: Finance Director Account No. (-STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve an amendment to the current Fire Protection Services Agreement for a period of two (2) years beginning October 1, 2000. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution authorizing the Mayor to sign an Amendment to the current Fire Protection Services Agreement. 2. Amendment to the current Fire Protection Services Agreement. A-200 (999) RESOLUTION NO. 2000 — 90 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXCECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND THE LOWER SWEETWATER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an Amendment to the Agreement between the City of National City and the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District for Fire Protection ad Emergency Medical Services. Said Agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this la` day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. iser, III City Attorney AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND LOWER SWEETWATER FIRE PROTECTION DISCTRICT FOR FIRE PROTECTION AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES This Amendment to Agreement is entered into this 1st day of August, 2000, by and between the City of National City ("CITY") and Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection Disctrict ("LSFPD"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on November 17, 1998, the CITY and LSFPD entered into an agreement entitled "Agreement for Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services for the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District"; and WHEREAS, the LSFPD was organized to provide fire protection to its citizens; and WHEREAS, the CITY lies contiguous to District territory and maintains professional fire protection and emergency medical service within its CITY; and WHEREAS, the CITY is willing to provide fire protection, emergency medical and related services to the LSFPD; and WHEREAS, ate current term of said Agreement is to expire on October 1, 2000; and WHEREAS, the CITY and LSFPD now wish to amend said Agreement to permit the CITY to extend the Agreement for an additional two year period. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefit to be derived therefrom, CITY and LSFPD agree to amend Sections 2, 4, and 5 of the "Agreement for Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services for the Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District," as follows: 2. TERM. This agreement will commence on October 1, 2000 and continue in full force and effect until October 1, 2002 unless either party invokes section three (3) "Termination" of this agreement. 4. QUARTERLY PAYMENTS. For each quarter year during the term of this agreement, commencing on October 1, 2000, and continuing thereafter for each subsequent quarter year (October 1, January 1, April 1 and July 1), the District agrees to pay the City advance quarterly payments for services. The current quarterly total of $32,787.35 shall be adjusted as of October 1, 2000, based upon the percent of any increases in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, (CPI) for the San Diego metropolitan area according to the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Statistics during the period of June 30, 1999 - June 30, 2000. The adjusted quarterly payment shall be in effect from October 1, 2000 — October 1, 2001. First Amendment to Agreement Fire Protection Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District Emergency Medical Services 5. ANNUAL SERVICE FEE ADJUSTMENT. The Annual Contract Fee shall be adjusted according to increases in the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, (CPI) for the San Diego metropolitan area according to the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of Statistics. The Annual Contract Fee will be adjusted October 1, 2001 based upon the percent of any increases in the above described CPI during the period of June 30, 2000 - June 30, 2001. Except as otherwise provided herein, all of the provisions of the Agreement for Fire Protection and Emergency Medical Services between the CITY and LSFPD dated November 17, 1998, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first herein set forth. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY LOWER SWEETWATER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT By: By George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, IIl City Attorney First Amendment to Agreement Lower Sweetwater Fire Protection District Emergency Medical Services Fire Protection City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT August 1, 2000 MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ITEM TITLE Resolution authorizing the purchase of a Diagnostic Engine Analyzer from Snap-On Industrial. PREPARED BY Brenda E. HodgegW24kk DEPARTMENT Purchasing EXPLANATION. See attachment Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement Funds are available in FY 00/01 budget. 643-422-224-599-0000 Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In concurrence with the Equipment Maintenance Supervisor, the P chasing Agent recommends that the award be made to Snap-On Industrial, and that authority be given to the Purchasing Agent to issue the resulting purchase orders. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION n/a ATTACHMENTS (listed Below) Explanation Cost breakdown Resolution Resolution No. A•200 {Rev. 9/80; Explanation Authority for this purchase exists in two areas: Sole Source: The Equipment Maintenance Division did extensive research, and found no other company that made an engine analyzer for this purpose. The only other similar machines are used extensively for smog tests. The Snap-On machine runs a full array of tests, as well as emissions testing. Snap-On Industrial is the manufacturer, therefore this particular machine is only available through a Snap-On dealer. Purchasing Ordinance #1480, section 12a(2) allows the bid process to be waived when the commodity can only be obtained from one vendor. Piggyback: The State of California has awarded a contract to Snap-On Industrial for the analyzer, and the contract is available to all public agencies. This contract guarantees the lowest price available anywhere. Therefore it would serve no purpose to compete the different Snap-On dealers against each other. They all sell for the State contract price. The State charges a 1.21% administrative fee for use of the contract. Total award of the contract would be: Snap-On Industrial: $27,381.43 State of California: $290.35 (for item #1 only) Grand total: $27,671.78 Otv 1 ea 1 ea 1 ea 1 ea Cost Breakdown for Snap-On Purchase Item Sun Machine 450 Plug Adaptor Nylon Covers Low Amps Probe Subtotal: Tax: Total: Snap-On Cost $23,996.00 $695.00 $196.00 $525.00 $25,412.00 $1969.43 $27,381.43 State of Ca. Fee Grand Total $290.35 (1.21%) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $290.35 $0.00 + $290.35 = $27,671.78 RESOLUTION NO. 2000 — 91 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ACCEPTING THE LOWEST RESPONSIVE BID FROM SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL, AND AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF ONE DIAGNOSTIC ENGINE ANALYZER WHEREAS, the State of California has issued an award, based on competitive bidding to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, Snap-On Industrial, for the purchase of a diagnostic engine analyzer; and WHEREAS, the Purchasing Agent has determined that the bidding procedures followed by the State of California fulfill the competitive bidding requirements of Chapter 2.60 of the National City Municipal Code, and that it would be beneficial to take advantage of the State of California's bidding process for the purchase of this equipment; and WHEREAS, in accordance with National City Municipal Code Section 2.60.260, Cooperative Purchasing, of Chapter 2.60 Purchasing System, authority exists to purchase equipment based on a price established by competitive bidding by another public jurisdiction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the Purchasing Agent is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City, a purchase order between Snap-On Industrial and the City of National City to provide one diagnostic engine analyzer. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla,City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATE E T MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 ITEM TITLE AGENDA ITEM NO. Resolution authorizing a sole source purchase of Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus equipment from 'Special T Fire Equipment'. PREPARED BY Brenda E. Hodges''%ti}N' EXPLANATION. The Fire Department wishes to purchase the following list of equipment: 7 3 each 5 each 3 each Breathing Apparatus Cylinders Facepiece DEPARTMENT Purchasing $2645.00 each $490.00 each $203.84 each Total award with tax and delivery: $11,848.75 Justification for this sole source purchase is outlined in the attached memo from Platoon Commander Potter. Declaration of sole source is made in the attached memo from MSA, the manufacturer. J Environmental Review X N/A Financiw! Statement Funds are available in the FY 00-01 budget. Account No. 301-409-500-598- $TAF RECOMMENDATION In concurrence with the Fire Department, the Purchasing Agent re mmends that the award be made to 'Special T Fire Equipment', and that authority be given to the Purchasing Agent to issue the resulting purchase order. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION n/a ATTACHMENTS (Listed Selowl Resolution No. Memo from Platoon Commander Potter, dated 7/21/00 Memo from MSA, dated 11/3/98 Resolution 57E A-200 (Rev. 4/8a) Brenda Hodges From: Craig Potter Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 1:55 PM To: Brenda Hodges Cc: Randy Kimble Subject: Sole Source Provider Brenda, The Fire Department would like to purchase self contained breathing apparatus (manufactured by MSA) form Special T Fire Equipment, 1894 Commercenter West # 104, San Bernardino, CA 92408. Special T Fire is the authorized. MSA dealer for our area. We would like to request MSA as the sole source provider due to the fact that all of our current self contained breathing apparatus are MSA. This would eliminate the need to duplicate such things as parts inventory, training for both our users and our repair people and would maintain compatibility with existing self contained breathing apparatus. Staying with the same self contained breathing apparatus manufacturer would help to keep overall cost down and aid in a safe operation. I have sent you a FAX, this date, on the bid information from Special T Fire Equipment on this subject. If you have any questions please contact me. Your help in this area is greatly appreciated. Thanks you. i Jr 12/11;1999 1S:07 9093830148 NCV 03 '98 14:09 FR MSA KIRKLPND SPECIAL T FIRE SS PAGE 02 425 739 2242 TO 919093930148 P.02/02 Mine Safety Appliancess Co., 550 03Kirkland Way,ax Suite 25) to73208, Kirkland, WA 98033 November 3, 1998 B/C Richard Brown Arcadia Fire Department 710 S. Sent*Anita Ave. Arcadia. CA 91006 Dear Richard, Please be advised that Special T Fire Equipment Inc. is the sole authorized supplier of MSA products to the fire service market in the State of California. MSA establishes distributors to sell, service and promote MSA products according to a prepared MSA business/market plan. Authorized distributors are assigned a business market within an assigned geographical aria. The MSA business plan provides MSA customers with the assurance that authorized distributors will provide them with proper equipment selection, training and repair service. MSA products sold tt,rough authorized MSA distributors are backed by MSA warranties. Please feel free to contact me should you have any further questions. My voice mail number is (800) 769. 423.6259. Sincerely, ** TOTAL PAGE.02 ** RESOLUTION NO. 2000 — 92 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY DISPENSING WITH THE BIDDING PROCESS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SPECIAL T FIRE EQUIPMENT FOR SELF-CONTAINED BREATHING APARATUS WHEREAS, the Fire Department desires to purchase self-contained breathing apparatus; and WHEREAS, all of the self-contained breathing apparatus currently used by the Fire Department is manufactured by MSA; and WHEREAS, the Fire Department has requested that the additional self-contained breathing apparatus to be acquired be acquired from Special T Fire Equipment because Special T Fire Equipment is the authorized MSA dealer for the National City area; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 2.60.220 (D), of the National City Municipal Code, the requirements of bidding may be dispensed with where the City Council determines that due to special circumstances, it is in the City's best interest to enter into a contract without complying with the bidding procedure; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that such circumstances exist in the present case. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby dispenses with the bidding process and authorizes the Mayor to execute an Agreement with Special T Fire Equipment for self-contained breathing apparatus. Said Agreement in on file in the Office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 iNTEm TITLE RESOLUTION APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 38- UNIT MOTEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 7 ` STREET AND ROOSEVELT AVENUE. (APPLICANT: RAMAN V. PATEL) (CASE FILE NO.: PD-1999-4) PREPARED BTJon Cain - Associate Planner DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The Council voted to approve this item at a July 18 public hearing. The attached resolution is necessary to follow through on the action. Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution. 4 6/2 1A Negative Declaration (see Initial Study IS-1999-5) BOARD / COMMISSION RECOM ENDATION N/A Account No. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Resolution A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000-9 3 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 38-UNIT MOTEL AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 7TH STREET AND ROOSEVELT AVENUE APPLICANT: RAMAN V. PATEL CASE FILE NO. PD-1999-4 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City considered a Planned Development Permit application to allow a 38-unit motel at the northeast corner of 7th Street and National City Boulevard at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of July 18, 2000 at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the City Council considered the staff report prepared for Case File Nos. PD-1999-4 and IS-1999-5, which is maintained by the City, and incorporated herein by reference; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State and City law; and, WHEREAS, this action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council at the public hearing held on July 18, 2000 support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the 23,958 square foot site exceeds the minimum 10,000 square foot lot size identified in City Codes for motel use, and since the project site plan includes parking, landscaping, and a pool to serve the use in compliance with City Code requirements. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the project is located on a collector street and nearby 8th Street is capable of handling the minimal increase in traffic that will be generated by the use. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the proposed motel complies with Design Guidelines and will be compatible with adjacent hotel/motel and commercial uses. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the proposed use is encouraged by the Tourist -Commercial Zoning of the property and is in the Motel -Planned Development Combining Zone area designed to allow for the development of this type of use. CONTINUE ON PAGE 2 Resolution No. 2000-93 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council has considered the proposed Negative Declaration No. IS-1999-5, together with any comments received during the public review process, and finds on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, approves the Negative Declaration, and authorizes the filing of a Notice of Determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Electrical, Plumbing, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations. 2. A drainage plan/grading plan showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off - site improvements shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer or other qualified professional, and shall be in accordance with City requirements. The plan shall show catch basins and proposed parking lot drainage along with all existing and proposed elevations. 3. All surface runoff, including landscaping adjoining the public right-of-way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities, and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface runoff that results from this development. 4. The property owner, or its successors and assigns shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all proposed and existing irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way, and shall adjust the sprinkler heads so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk, or the streets. The proposed sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner, its successors or assigns shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right-of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. 5. For P.V.C. irrigation lines in the public right-of-way, a metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of the lines. 6. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for Engineering Department review. The report shall address the stability of all existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure, and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. At a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2-inch A.C. over 4-inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 modified. CONTINUE ON PAGE 3 Resolution No. 2000-93 Page 3 7. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of- way shall be at least 6-inch in size with a clean -out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 8. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 9. The existing street improvements along property frontages shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers or other approved methods. 10. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the National City Engineering Department. 11. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and for grading construction on private property. 12. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvement, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. The requirements are for grading above 50 cubic yards. 13. All missing street improvements (i.e., curbs) shall be constructed and damaged portions of the sidewalk shall be replaced in accordance with City standards. Abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. 14. Before this Planned Development Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of Planned Development Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 15. Use authorized by this Planned Development Permit shall be limited to a motel in conformance with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-1999-4, dated Dec. 9, 1999. CONTINUE ON PAGE 4 Resolution No. 2000-93 Page 4 16. Except as required by conditions of approval, plans for future permits shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit A, case file no. PD-1999-4, dated Dec. 9, 1999. 17. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 18. A trash enclosure shall be provided in accordance with City standards. It shall have a stucco exterior finish to match the building. 19. The property owner shall submit a letter to the Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the Authority for any water facility improvements required for the proposed motel. 20. The perimeter wall shown on the plans shall have a stucco finish to match the building. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution shall be transmitted forthwith to the applicant; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the resolution is adopted. The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1st day of August, 2000. ATTEST: MICHAEL R. DALLA, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: GEORGE H. 3ISER, III -CITY ATTORNEY GEORGE H. WATERS, MAYOR City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .4EETING DATE A'gust 1f2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 (-ITEM TITLE A Resolution Authorizing the Mayor to Execute an Agreement with the City of Chula Vista for Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste PREPARED BY Jeff Servatius DEPARTMENT Public Works EXPLANATION By AB-939, we are required to have a viable program for the disposal of Household Hazardous Waste (HHW). For the past two years, we have contracted with the City of Poway to provide National City residents with a facility to dispose of their HHW. That contract has now expired and Poway has turned over operation of their facility to the Regional Solid Waste Authority (RSWA). It may be possible for us to enter into an agreement with RSWA which would allow National City residents to continue to take HHW to Poway, but this location is very inconvenient and residents have been reluctant to make the long drive (1 resident disposed of HHW last year). Entering into the agreement with Chula Vista provides National City residents with a convenient way to dispose of HHW. The establishment of this agreement also meets the AB-939 requirements. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The estimated annual cost of the p STAFF RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor to execu am is currently within the Refuse Enterprise Budget. e me BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A f Chula Vista. Account No. 172-422-225-2'6 ATTACHMENTS . (Listed Below Resolution No. 1. Agreement with the Cif i orula Vista 2. Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Safety Kleen Corporation A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2000 - 94 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR DISPOSAL OF HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE WHEREAS, pursuant to State law, the City is required to have a viable program for the disposal of household hazardous waste; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is the grant administrator and the lead jurisdiction of a Used Oil Black Grant and a Household Hazardous Waste Grant, which were awarded to the cities of National City, Chula Vista, Coronado and Imperial Beach by the California Integrated Waste Management Board; and WHEREAS, it has been proposed that the City of National City enter into an agreement with the City of Chula Vista whereby Chula Vista will operate the used oil and household hazardous waste program for National City residents, in consideration for reimbursement by National City of Chula Vista's direct costs in operating the program; and WHEREAS, the proposed agreement will enable the program to be offered to residents of National City efficiently and conveniently. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Counsel of the City of National City that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute an agreement with the City of Chula Vista for disposal of Household hazardous waste. Said agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 18` day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE SOUTH BAY USED OIL AND HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE PROGRAMS UNDER USED OIL BLOCK GRANT FIFTH CYCLE UBG5-96-2055 HOUSEHOLD HAZAROUS WASTE GRANT SEVENTH CYCLE HD7-98-2828, THIS AGREEMENT (the "Agreement"), is made and entered this day of September by and between the City of Chula Vista ("Chula Vista"), a co -grantee and a municipal corporation, and the City of Imperial Beach and National City. Recitals WHEREAS, Chula Vista, in conjunction with the cities of Coronado, Imperial Beach, and National City, were awarded a Used Oil Block Grant and Household Hazardous Waste Grant, by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) on July 1, 1999, in the amount of $88,506 and $257,070 respectively; and WHEREAS, the goals of this grant are to: 1) Offer a proactive public education program to promote Household Hazardous Waste (HHW), source reduction, reuse and recycling and proper disposal through the drop-off facility to be located at the Chula Vista Corporate Yard and/or a door-to-door collection program, 2) to establish a permanent facility in the South Bay to provide a waste exchange and HHW drop-off, and 3) provide door-to-door collection for the disabled and a door-to-door option for residents; and WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista is the Grant Administrator and the lead jurisdiction for a cooperative project, and has entered into a contract with Safety Kleen/Curbside Inc., and has sole responsibility for reporting to and making payment requests of the CIWMB and subcontractors for this cooperative project; and, WHEREAS, Imperial Beach and National City residents will use the door-to-door program and drop-off facility that is available to residents within Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach and National City; pursuant to the same terms and conditions as set forth in the "Scope of Work," attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference, and WHEREAS, Imperial Beach and National City have agreed to execute used oil/HHW reciprocal/use agreements with Chula Vista to provide that residents of Imperial Beach and National City may use the Chula Vista Facility and participate in the door-to-door agreement; and WHEREAS, the proper disposal of used oil and other HHW benefits all residents of the south suburban areas of the County; and WHEREAS, the Facility and door-to-door collection agreement complies with all federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning the disposal of used oil and HHW; and WHEREAS, the City of Imperial Beach and National City as participants agree to reimburse the City of Chula Vista, as Grant Administrator and Agreement Administrator for the door-to-door program administered by Safety Kleen/Curbside Inc., for disposal expenses incurred through the use of the Facility and the Door-to-door program by their residents which are not covered by the grant. Memorandum of Understanding Page 2 National City also agrees to comply with all the terms and conditions of the State Grants and the Agreement with Curbside Inc.,/ Safety Kleen for door-to-door collection service. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these recitals and the mutual covenants contained herein, Imperial Beach, National City and the City of Chula Vista agree as follows: 1. Duties. Chula Vista agrees to perform the duties as Administrator for the CIWMB grants and agreement with Curbside Inc.,/Safety Kleen, 2. Term. This agreement shall commence on the date stated above and shall continue through the later of June 30, 2001 or the termination of the Grants and Safety Kleen Agreements, provided however that Imperial Beach and/or National City may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to Chula Vista and full payment of any and all amounts due the City and/or the contractor, Safety Kleen, or their successor for service provided prior to cancellation. 3. Payment. Imperial Beach and National City shall reimburse Chula Vista for direct costs for their respective residents use of the HHW drop-off or door-to-door collection program, which are not funded by the CIWMB grants on a monthly or quarterly basis to be determined by the City of Chula Vista at it's discretion. However, at a minimum, a payment request shall be submitted to Imperial Beach and National City every six months (including an end of fiscal year statement), if costs have been incurred and not yet claimed. Chula Vista agrees to submit to the City of Imperial Beach and National City any and all reasonably appropriate documentation for all costs claimed. Types of acceptable documentation include: name, drivers license number and address of individual dropping HHW off at center or name, address and telephone number of person requesting and receiving door-to-door HHW service along with verification of co -payment. 4. Dispute. If a dispute should arise regarding the performance under this Agreement, the parties hereby agree to attempt to settle the dispute by subsequent agreement between Imperial Beach or National City and Chula Vista staff. In the event that a dispute continues, the Special Operations Manager for Chula Vista and a representative of the effected jurisdiction shall state their respective views of the dispute in a letter to The City of Chula Vista sending copies to each other. Within ten (10) working days of receiving the letters from both parties, a representative of the City Attorney's office shall consider the facts and solutions recommended by each party. In such cases, the action of the City Attorney's office shall be binding upon all participating jurisdictions Cities. Nothing in this procedure shall prohibit the parties seeking remedies available to them by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto set our hands and seals this day and year first written above. CITY OF CHULA VISTA City of Imperial Beach/National City Title Title Date Date Agreement between City of Chula Vista and. Curbside Inc, a Safety Kleen Corp. Company for Household Hazardous Waste Collection, transportation, reuse and disposal/recycling service and technical or public education services. This agreement ("Agreement"), dated October 1, 1999 for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 1 is between the City -related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6 ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals Whereas, the State of California has required all Cities and Counties to development and implement a Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) source reduction, recycling, reuse and disposal plan; and, Whereas, the State has authorized Cities to establish fees to pay for the cost of development and implementation of a Household Hazardous Waste Element under the guidance of the California Integrate Waste Management Board; and, Whereas, the City has paid for Chula Vista residents to utilized the Coronado facility on an emergency basis subsequent to the County of San Diego discontinuing the Regional HHW plan in 1977; and, Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement (including but not limited to the collection, transportation, reuse and disposal of household hazardous waste in accordance with all local, state and federal law; (End of Recitals. Next Page starts Obligatory' Provisions.) 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 1 Obligatory Provisions Pages NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Duties: The Consultant shall provide Household Hazardous Waste Collection, transportation, reuse recycling and/or disposal service to Chula Vista generators identified by the City, and technical or public education services. The Consultant shall also provide technical assistance and public education support as requested by the City, A. General Duties: • Train City or its designated hotline contractor to take calls and schedule pickups. • Provide 1-800 number for referrals. • Coordinate collection dates. • Collect all HHW items scheduled by City for collection from residential dwellings. • Clean and return Collection Boxes and unused portion of kits. • Meet the minimum schedule requirements for Collection. • Collect and record HHW, Co -payments, Additional & Supplemental Service Fees from each collection stop. • Dispose of Material as Outlined in the Hierarchy of Disposal and in accordance with local, state and federal law. • Provide reports in a timely manner and in a form acceptable to the City. • Provide additional related technical support, educational support or collection services as requested by the City. Consultant shall perform all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties"; and, B. Scope of Work and Schedule In the process of performing and delivering said "General Duties", Consultant shall also perform all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8,'entitled " Scope of Work and Schedule", not inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services". Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate this Agreement. 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 2 C. Reductions in Scope of Work City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Defined Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with said reduction. D. Additional Services In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, City may require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the Defined Services ("Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11 (C), unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed. E. Standard of Care Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. F. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and sub -consultants. employed by it in connection with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverage, in the following categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V' or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City: Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 9. Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City and Applicant as an Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross -liability Coverage"). 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 3 Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy. (Intentionally Omitted) G. Proof of Insurance Coverage. (1) Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. (2) Policy Endorsements Required. - Certificate of Indemnity provided by Safety Kleen Corp. in the Amount of 1 billion Dollars In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross -liability Coverage required under Consultant's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Risk Manager. H. Security for Performance. (1) Performance Bond. (Intentionally Omitted) (2) Letter of Credit. (Intentionally Omitted) (6) Other Security (Intentionally Omitted) I. Business License Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 2. Duties of the City A. Consultation and Cooperation City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule therein contained, and to provide 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 4 direction and guidance to achieve the objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit access to its office facilities, files and records by Consultant throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the further understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance of this agreement. B. Suppport Services The City or its contract agent will provide hotline services in conjunction with Consultants duties as set forth in the attached Scope of Work, publish and distribute kits, including collection boxes, survey cards, postage for return mail of survey cards and transmit survey cards to Consultant. The City will also provide the Consultant with at least five working days to review and comment on all public education materials or script prior to publication, or distribution by the City or its hotline subcontractor. C. Compensation (See Payment in Scope of Work or Attachment) Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant submitted to the City periodically as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11, adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement, subject to the requirements for retention set forth in paragraph 19 of Exhibit A, and shall compensate Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12. All billings submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient information as to the propriety of the billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper, and shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged upon making such payment. 3. Administration of Contract Each party designates the individuals ("Contract Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 13, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this agreement. (Bill Anderson, President Curbside Inc., and Paul Nager, Branch Manager, Safety Kleen Inc.,) 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 5 4. Term. This Agreement shall be month to month and shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions hereof or upon 30 days notice by the City of Chula Vista. The term shall begin upon execution of the agreement and end July 1, 2000, however it may be extended at the discretion of the City upon mutual agreement of the Contractor. 5. Liquidated Damages (Intentionally Omitted) 6. Financial Interests of Consultant A. Consultant is Designated as a FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhillit A, Paragraph 15, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 15 of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney. B. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. C. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this agreement. D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 6 economic interest during the term of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 15. L. Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. 7. Hold Harmless Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 7 out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Consultants' indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Otay shall defend, indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees and any other cities participating in the Agreement from and against all Losses which such City Indemnified Parties may suffer, or which may be recovered from or obtainable against such City Indemnified Parties, resulting from any repair, cleanup, detoxification, or preparation and implementation of any removal, remedial, response, closure or other plan or replacement or restoration of natural resources (regardless of whether undertaken due to governmental action) at any landfill, incinerator, processing or reuse facility at which Curbside Inc., and or Safety Kleen Corp. or any affiliate therof (including predecessors -in -interest and successors -in interest) disposed of any materials including but not limited to household hazardous waste collected from City Generators, or activities of Curbside Inc., and Safety Kleen Corp., or any affiliate thereof which result in a release or threatened release of hazardous materials into the environment in or around the City or at any landfill, incinerator, reuse, recycling facility or in transport thereto. The foregoing indemnity is intended to operate as an agreement pursuant to Section 107(e) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 USC, Section 9607 (e), and California Health and Safety code 25364, to defend, protect, hold harmless and indemnify the City Indemnified parities from liability. The provisions of this Section 7 shall survive the end of the term or termination of this Agreement. Nothing in this section is intended to supercede the parties agreement to meet and confer in the event of a change in law. 8. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 8 the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach. 9. Errors and Omissions (Intentionally Omitted) In the event that the City Administrator determines that the Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement. 10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for door to door Household Hazardous Waste Collection Services provided in accordance with the Scope of Works Attached hereto as Attachment A. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein. 11. Assignability The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City. City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the Defined Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17 to the sub -consultants identified thereat as "Permitted Sub - consultants". 12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 9 All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. 13. Independent Contractor City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Therefore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax, and Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with regard thereto. 14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 15. Attorney Fees 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 10 Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to a judgment against the other for an amount equal to reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred. The "prevailing party" shall be deemed to be the party who is awarded substantially the relief sought. 16. Statement of Costs In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of a report or document in performing the Defined Services, Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document. 17. Miscellaneous A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consultant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman (Intentionally Omitted) C. Notices All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties. D. Entire Agreement This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. E. Capacity of Parties 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 11 Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. F. Governing LawNenue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista. [end of page. next page is signature page.] 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 12 Signature Page to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and Curbside Inc, A subsidiary of Safety Kleen Corp., For Household Hazardous Waste Collection, transportation, reuse recycling and disposal service, and related technical or public education support services. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: Dated: , 19_ City of Chula Vista John Coggins, Purchasing Director Approved as to form: John M. Kaheny, City Attorney Dated: by: MICHAEL T. MEACHAM, Special Operations Manager By: Bill Anderson, President, Curbside Inc. By: Paul Nager, Branch Manager, Safety Kleen, Corp., 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 13 Exhibit List to Agreement A. Exhibit to Agreement B. Safety Kleen Corp. Indemnification C. Certificate of Insurance and Indemnification D. Schedule of Rates for Additional Services 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 14 Exhibit A to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and Curbside Inc, a Safety Kleen Corp. Company 1. Effective Date of Agreement: October 1, 1999 2. City -Related Entity: (X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California ("City") 3. Place of Business for City: City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 4. Consultant: Curbside Inc., a Safety Kleen Corp. Company 5. Business Form of Consultant: ( ) Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership (X) Corporation 6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant: 1845 Orangewood Avenue, Suite 320 Orange, California 92868 Voice Phone (714) 785-8003 Toll Free-1-800-449-7587 Fax Phone (714) 634-3799) e-mail pfa@curbsideinc.com 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 15 7. General Duties: The Consultant shall provide door-to-door household hazardous waste collection, reuse, recycling and/or disposal as well as additional technical and educational support services for generators designated by the City. 8. Scope of Work and Schedule: A. Detailed Scope of Work: See Attachment A B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: (X) Same as Effective Date of Agreement () Other: C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables: See Scope of Work D. Date for completion of all Consultant services: Services shall be completed on a month to month basis within two weeks of a call for door-to-door household hazardous waste service in accordance with the conditions included in the Scope of Work (Attachment A). All work shall be completed prior to July 1, 2000 unless the City in writing has previously authorized an extension. 9. Insurance Requirements: (x) Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance (x) Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: $1,000,000. (x) Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000. () Errors and Omissions insurance: Not required not applicable (included in Commercial General Liability coverage). () Errors and Omissions Insurance: not applicable $250,000 (not included in Commercial General Liability coverage). 10. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant: The City will provide hotline services for the public to schedule appointments, publish and distribute kits and HHW containers, survey cards, transmit survey cards to consultant, postage for return mail of any survey cards: see Scope of Work 11. Compensation: 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 16 City shall compensate consultant for all services rendered by consultant in the amount set forth in the detailed scope of work. A. (X) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement. The terms for compensation are limited to those services outlined in Section 4. Fees, of the Scope of Work, Attachment A to this Exhibit. The services are limited to the items authorized under Attachment B. B. () Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. Intentionally Omitted C. () Hourly Rate Arrangement intentionally Omitted D. (x) At such time as Consultant shall has incurred costs for the door-to-door collection program in the City equal to $49,500 ("authorization limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the City. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at the sole cost and expense of the Consultant. Category of Employee Of Consultant of experience required Clerical Support $20 Technical Support Staff $45 Rate Schedule Name or credential/ level Hourly Rate 12. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement: Included in the Scope of Work and compensation outlined therein. 13. Contract Administrators: City: Michael T. Meacham, Special Projects Manager, Consultant: William B. Anderson, President, Curbside Inc: 14. Liquidated Damages Rate: Intentionally Omitted 15. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 17 (X) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer. ( ) FPPC Filer 16. ( ) Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman 17. Permitted Sub -consultants: None 18. Bill Processing: A. Consultant's billing to be submitted for the following period of time: (X) Monthly ( ) Quarterly ( ) Other: B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing: ( ) First of the Month (X) 15th Day of each Month ( ) End of the Month ( ) Other: C. City's Account Number: 19. Security for Performance (Intentionally Omitted) ( ) Performance Bond, Not required ( ) Letter of Credit, Not required ( ) Other Security: Not required ( ) Retention. Not required (Attachment A) a1Y of CHUTA VISTA SCOPE OF WORK 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 18 Door -to -Door Household Hazardous Waste Collection Program Curbside Inc., a Safety-Kleen Corp. Company (Consultant) will perform the following tasks as part of their agreement to provide door-to-door household hazardous waste (HHW) collection from residential dwellings and as generally described in the Operational Plan (Attachment A). When a task references "City," it is meant to include all participating cities as approved and directed by the City of Chula Vista. "Generator, " shall mean every owner, tenant, occupant or person owning or having the care and control of any premises in the City including the person(s) requesting Household Hazardous Waste services. 1. HOTLINE A. CALLS • All initial calls for HHW collection service will be answered by the City's Hotline/public education Contractor (I Love A Clean San Diego, ILACSD). • The Consultant will providing training for ILACSD personnel as necessary but no less than 16 hours to schedule HHW service dates and collect the minimal data required from residential HHW Generators to provide service and complete required reports. • The Consultant will provide a 1-800 number for customers and make follow- up return telephone calls to respond to all questions beyond the scope of scheduling the time and location of collection. B. COORDINATION • The Consultant will be responsible for coordinating collection dates with ILACSD on a weekly basis. • Each quarter, a Consultant representative will perform a site visit and meet with ILACSD personnel to discuss program issues and establish program objectives to improve the hotline component and communication between agencies. • The Consultant shall commit not less than four hours quarterly on site training with the hotline supervisor and telephone staff during the quarterly site visit. 2, COLLECTION A. MATERIALS TO BE COLLECTED BY THE CONSULTANT • The attached list HHW Waste Types (Attachment B) identifies items, which 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 19 will be collected under the Standard fee (as defined in Section 4 Fees), and some items that will not be accepted without additional payment. The listing is intended to be a guide of basic categories and will be periodically revised to reflect actual experience under the agreement. • The Consultant will assist the hotline operators who will refer residents with excluded items to a satisfactory destination (and report to Cities). • The maximum quantity per residential stop under the base fee shall not be less than 200 lbs. Which may include: 1) a 12-14 gallon box of non -recyclable items estimated to be not more than 75 pounds, 2)up to 10 gallons of antifreeze, 3) up to 10 gallons of latex paint, 4) unlimited auto batteries, used oil and used oil filters outside the box. • Prior to performing any collection requiring a fee greater than the Standard Fee outlined under Section 4. Fees, The Consultant will obtain written approval from the City or the residential Generator and advance payment from the resident for the incremental amount. B. COLLECTION BOX • The Consultant shall empty, clean and return HHW boxes and any unused portion of the kits to the City for redistribution. • Delivery shall be made no less than one (1) time per month to no more than 3 locations in Chula Vista and one location in other participating cities. C. SCHEDULE FOR STANDARD COLLECTION SERVICES • Collections will be scheduled no later than (10) ten working days from the date of the initial call to the Consultant for service. The Consultant shall make a good faith effort to collect sooner. • If the demand is very strong and requests exceed 150 requests per week in the first 120 days of the program, collections may take up to fifteen working days. • Dates for collection will be submitted by Consultant and approved by City and based upon the time it takes to deliver the box and provide the resident with approximately 4 days to pack the box and frequency needed to serve all customer requests for Chula Vista and other participating cities. • If collection is attempted on the scheduled date and the HHW is not ready for collection, The Consultant will call the resident to reschedule within ten working days, and notify the host City. D. COPAYMENT FOR STANDARD SERVICE, SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES AND CORRESPONDING FEES • The Consultant will collect the Co -payment as defined in Section 4 Fees. 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 20 • The Co -payment and residential payment of additional fees will be payable to The Consultant. • If The Consultant receives the Co -payment the amount will be deducted from the invoice to the City. • If the co -payment is not made the City will be billed and the address and contact information will be provided in the monthly report/invoice. E. SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES -LARGE ITEMS The following services will not be performed without the prior written approval of the City or written approval and prior payment by the Generator: • The Consultant will collect containers larger than 5 gallons (including 55- gallon drums) that shall be subject to first obtaining: a) Written approval by the City, or b) Signature of approval and secured payment by the residential Generator • Drum and/or Over -pack fee as applicable and as defined in Section 4 fees. • The Consultant will also collect more than 10 gallons of latex paint, ten gallons of anti freeze or more than one box of solvents and other HHW for a Supplemental charge listed in Section 4 Fees. • (at the City's discretion) or the residents written approval shall 3. DISPOSAL: 1'111: HIERARCHY OF DISPOSAL SHALL BE: A. First to comply with all local, state and federal laws for reuse, recycling and disposal. B. Reuse in the Regional HHW Waste Exchange or other appropriate reuse facility. C. Recycling. D. Disposal through Incineration. E. Disposal in a Subtitle D compliant and Federally Permitted Hazardous Waste Landfill . F. The Consultant shall be the generator of record when allowable by state law (California State currently requires that the jurisdiction of origin be the generator of record). 4, FEES: A. "Full Service," the City shall pay a fee of $80 per collection stop excluding co - payments when at the City's discretion the Consultant provides the collection box, kit instructions and related public education materials. B. "Standard;" the City shall pay a fee of $70 per collection stop excluding co - payments. C. "Co -payment;" the Generator shall pay a $5 per stop co -payment for first annual 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 21 service, $15 co -payment for the second annual visit and full cost in advance for any additional visits. The City may at its sole discretion amend the co -payment increases on a per site or program wide basis. D. "Field Test," the Generator shall pay the full cost of any field tests for materials which The Consultant personnel reasonably suspect as contaminated, not to exceed $140. (Field test shall not be performed without City prior consent). E. "Rush Charge" - the Generator shall pay the full cost of any service requested by the Generator and rendered by The Consultant which does not fit into the standard schedule, not to exceed $25. F. "Supplemental" the Generator shall pay a fee of $2.00 per gallon for every gallon of latex paint and every gallon of antifreeze over 10 (per commodity) accepted outside of the box. G. "Return," the Generator shall pay a $25.00 return fee for failure to set out materials on the appointment date. H. "Drum," fee" a $65.00 per stop fee will be charged to cover the cost of drum handling and recycling upon written City or residential approval. I. "Over -Pack," an additional charge of $75.00 will be added if the drum must be "Over -Packed." J. The maximum per drum supplemental charge per stop total would be $140.00. K. The City shall pay the "$5 and $15 co -payment," $2 "supplemental". fee when not paid by the Generator. L. The City shall pay the $25 return fee if the materials are not set out on the second visit and the residential Generator has not paid the fee. M. The Consultant shall be authorized to request a credit card authorization as security against the $15 Co -payment, "Return fee," and optional services provided. N. The Consultant shall deduct any "Co -payment" received from the $75 total cost per stop charged to the City. O. The Consultant shall deduct any Co -payment and Return fee paid by the Generator if materials are set out, and a Standard fee is charged to the City on the 2"d visit. P. Notwithstanding any provision in this agreement to the contrary in the event that during the Term of this agreement The Consultant or any affiliate thereof agrees to a service rate or rates under a HHW agreement within the County of San Diego which is lower than the service rate or rates then in effect for the corresponding service(s) within the City (including additional services at the same or lower rate), then, The Consultant, shall immediately charge such lower service rate(s) or provide such comparable services to City and residential Generators. 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 22 5. REPORTS TO BE PROVIDED BY [BE CONSULTANT A. Form and Schedule 1. A cumulative collection report with names, addresses serviced and all fees and charged, along with residential authorizations will be issued with each monthly invoice within 15 days of the end of the month for the preceding month. 2. Along with each monthly invoice, the Consultant will include a list of co - payments, additional and supplemental charges by address and copy of authorization for each location a co -payment, additional or supplemental service was provided in the monthly report. 3. A quarterly comprehensive progress report including period information and program -to -date information will be issued within 30 days of the end of each calendar quarter. 4. Upon request, copies of collection receipts will be produced within 15 days at the end of the quarter for the previous quarter. 5. Any information and format requested by the City that is consistent with reporting requirements of local, State and Federal agencies. 6. PUBLIC EDUCATION MATERIALS 1. Immediately upon execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall supply preexisting public education material on disk in IBM format as well as camera- ready artwork to the City as needed in the development of the kit including; Spanish and English Instruction Sheet, Instruction label, Property Tag, Container Warning Sticker, Inventory Receipt, Product Identification Stickers, Generator Authorization Card, Program Survey, The Consultant graphic and We Care graphic. 2. Immediately upon execution of the Agreement, the Consultant shall provide a written script for telephone hotline personnel to be provided to the City for its review and comment on a diskette in MS Word 97. 3. Immediately upon execution of the Agreement the Consultant will also supply pre-existing We -care stickers or other pre-printed information used in the program that promotes The Consultant. 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 23 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE 08/01/00 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #04 PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE EXPLANATION Ratification of Warrant Register #04 per Government Section Code 37208. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approved By: Finance Director Account No. I recommend ratification of these warrants for a 1a1 of $534,296.44 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION kiiL°c/i2 ' ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Warrant Register #04 2. Workers' Comp Warrant Register dated 07/19/00 A-200 (9.99) Resolution No. City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT dIEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 ITEM TITLE CONSOLIDATED CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF JUNE 30, 2000 PREPARED BY EXPLANATION For the City Council's information and in compliance with the City's investment policy, the consolidated cash and investment report as of June 30, 2000 is hereby submitted. This report reflects the components of the investment portfolio as of June 30, 2000 and the results of the investment program for the period then ended. The investment portfolio provides for sufficient liquidity to meet the following month's estimated expenditures. T. Limfueco DEPARTMENT Finance Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement Not applicable. STAFF RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the report be accepted and filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECO ENDATION ATTAq!tmitimolinit. 2. Portfolio Summary. 3. Portfolio Details - Investments. 4. Activity Report — Sorted by Brokers. A-200 i9. 991 LYow Approved By: Finance Director Account No. 5. Consolidated &FRVel3" . No. 6. Monthly Statement of Receipts. 7. Monthly Statement of Disbursements. 8. Pooled Investment Transactions Report. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CASH ACCOUNT SUMMARY June 2000 BALANCE REVOLVING CASH $ 3,602.08 RETURNED CHECKS 3,991.19 BANK OF AMERICA #80200 -1,306,503.59 OUTSTANDING WARRANTS 362,327.90 PAYROLL OUTSTANDING WARRANTS -19,014.38 CASH HELD BY BROKERS 1,866.35 INVESTMENTS 24,389,555.72 LAIF 7,444,487.81 TOTAL $ 30,155,657.28 INVESTMENT EARNINGS HISTORY: FISCAL YEAR YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL YEAR 1999-00 $ 1,460,752.41*$ 1998-99 1,702,889.57 1997-98 1,478,232.91 1996-97 1,256,907.31 1995-96 974,113.25 1994-95 1,001,709.56 1993-94 1,011,586.52 1992-93 721,913.49 1991-92 864,052.63 1990-91 1,303,878.52 1989-90 1, 544, 993.71 1988-89 1, 311, 930.94 1987-88 979,435.87 1986-87 1,048,978.23 1985-86 1,321,688.93 1984.85 1, 543, 266.30 1,702,889.57 1,478,232.91 1,256,907.31 974,113.25 1,001,709.56 1,011,586.52 721,913.49 864,052.63 1,303,878.52 1, 544, 993.71 1,311,930.94 979,435.87 1, 048, 978.23 1,321,688.93 1,543,266.30 * This figure does not include interest accruals for June. 0600 SymPro Investments City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary June 30, 2000 City of National City Par Market Book % of Days to YTM/C YTM/C Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 7,813,000.00 7,813,000.00 7,813,000.00 32.03 509 236 6.315 6.403 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity 194,000.00 194,000.00 194,000.00 0.80 1,081 822 6.436 6.526 Negotiable/Transferable CDs 5,062,000.00 4,747,050.56 4,670,189.12 19.15 1,948 1,482 8.119 8.232 Federal Agency Securities 11,365,000.00 11,139,594.72 11,363,500.16 46.59 1,293 917 6.191 6.276 Pass Through Securities 336,957.99 338,661.75 348,866.44 1.43 1,396 577 7.041 7.138 Investments 24,770,957.99 24,232,307.03 24,389,555.72 100.00% 1,167 801 6.614 6.706 Total Earnings Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return June 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Fiscal Year Ending 125,600.69 24,230,369.07 6.31% Marylou Matienz erector of Finance Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:26 1,298,619.47 20,627,637.50 6.28% 1,298,619.47 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V5.olf 220872DT9 Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:26 City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Average Purchase CUSIP Investment# Issuer - Balance Date Par Value Page 2 Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10258 Advanta Bank Corp 08/27/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.250 6.250 58 08/28/2000 10183 Argo Federal Savings Bank 04/30/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 668 04/30/2002 10367 American Pacific Bank 03/17/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.950 6.950 261 03/19/2001 10201 Ashbum Bank 05/11/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 314 05/11/2001 10192 Associates National Bank 05/06/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.850 5.850 674 05/06/2002 10254 Beach First National Bank 08/05/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.150 6.150 34 08/04/2000 10306 BankStarOne 12/01/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 152 11/30/2000 10398 Boundary Water Community Bank 08/30/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.600 366 07/02/2001 10333 BPD International Bank 01/05/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 187 01/04/2001 10312 BankUSA FSB 12/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 173 12/21/2000 10027 Capital One FSB 09/29/1998 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.793 5.793 90 09/29/2000 10225 Corn Belt B & T Co 06/28/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.200 6.200 362 06/28/2001 10261 Community Bank of New Jersey 09/29/1990 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.350 6.350 90 09/29/2000 10173 Cross Country Bank 04/02/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.580 5.580 275 04/02/2001 10302 Commercial Federal Bank FSB 11/12/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 135 11/13/2000 10256 Citizens Bank & Trust Co 08/19/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.220 6.220 48 08/18/2000 10252 Citizens State Bank 07/30/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.100 6.100 30 07/31/2000 10255 Clyde Savings Bank 08/05/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.150 6.150 34 08/04/2000 10295 Community National Bank 10/25/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 117 10/26/2000 10174 Cows Bank 04/16/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.450 5.450 654 04/16/2002 10384 Cowlitz Bank 05/08/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 311 05/08/2001 10350 Decatur State Bank 02/03/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.800 6.800 216 02/02/2001 10181 Eaton Bank/Centennial Bank 04/29/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 303 04/30/2001 10207 Erie State Bank 05/14/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.500 5.500 136 11/14/2000 10303 First Bank of Brunswick, The 11/10/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 131 11/09/2000 10246 First Tier Bank 07/02/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.100 6.100 1 07/02/2000 10182 First Bank of Richmond SB 04/29/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 667 04/29/2002 10300 First Bank of Turley 11/02/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 123 11/01/2000 10251 - First Choice Bank 07/28/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.120 - 6.120 26 07/27/2000 10388 First Financial Bank 06/02/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.750 7.750 336 06/02/2001 10344 First Enterprise Bank 01/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.800 6.800 206 01/23/2001 10374 First Federal Bank FSB 04/19/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.050 7.050 292 04/19/2001 10179 FNB of Elk River 04/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 660 04/22/2002 10209 FNB of Jackson 05/20/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.800 5.881 324 05/21/2001 10313 Franklin Bank & Trust Co 01/04/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 186 01/03/2001 10248 First Republic Savings Bank 07/21/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.100 6.100 19 07/20/2000 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01f City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment a Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10289 First State Bank 10/15/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.410 6.410 107 10/18/2000 10260 First State Bank of Colfax 09/02/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.300 6.300 185 01/02/2001 10247 -First Suburban National Bank 07/15/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.150 6.150 199 01/16/2001 99100323 10259 Great Western Bank 08/31/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.250 6.250 60 08/30/2000 10020 Golden Security Thrift & Loan 07/28/1998 90,000.00 90,000.00 90,000.00 5.980 5.980 27 07/28/2000 10309 Guaranty Bank 12/16/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.800 167 12/15/2000 10297 Hometown Bank of Villa Rica 11/01/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 8.550 8.641 122 10/31/2000 10385 Heritage Bank of Commerce 05/12/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.350 7.350 314 05/11/2001 10310 High Desert State Bank 12/17/1999 99,009.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.610 8.610 170 12/18/2000 10250 Hinsbrook Bank & Trust 07/23/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.100 6.100 23 07/24/2000 10311 Home City Federal Savings Bank 12/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00. 6.800 6.600 173 12/21/2000 1041542/117391 10178 Insouth Bank 04/21/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 660 04/22/2002 10308 International Bank of Chicago 12/14/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 165 12/13/2000 10351 Ionia County National Bank 02/03/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.800 6.800 216 02/02/2001 10169 Key Bank USA 04/05/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 278 04/05/2001 10290 Lighthouse Community Bank 10/19/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 8.500 109 10/18/2000 10343 Leighton State Bank 01/20/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 - 99,000.00 8.760 6.760 202 01/19/2001 10368 Lewiston State Bank 03/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.000 7.097 268 03/26/2001 tii 10223 Merrick Banking Corporation 06/21/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.000 8.000 355 06/21/2001 10307 Metter Banking Company 12/07/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 8.650 6.650 158 12/06/2000 10025 Metropolitan FSB of Cleveland 09/29/1998 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.900 5.900 93 10/02/2000 10204 Michigan Heritage Bank 05/13/1999 99,000.00 . 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.700 5.700 681 05/13/2002 10380 NCB Savings Bank FSB 04/28/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 303 04/30/2001 10292 Northeast Bank 10/08/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.400 6.400 101 10/10/2000 10373 Nicollet State Bank 04/04/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.050 7.050 276 04/03/2001 10249 Nat'l Republic Bank of Chicago 07/23/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.150 8.150 23 07/24/2000 10253 Oakwood Deposit Bank Co, The 08/02/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.150 6.150 32 08/02/2000 10224 Park Avenue Bank NA, The 06/24/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.050 6.050 359 06/25/2001 10396 Peoples Bank of Kentucky 08/05/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 339 06/05/2001 10304 Planters Bank 11/18/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 139 11/17/2000 10296 Providian National Bank 10/28/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.520 6.520 119 10/28/2000 10177 Queens County Savings Bank 04/20/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.650 5.650 - 660 04/22/2002 10305 Republic Bank Bountiful 11/23/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 ' 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 145 11/23/2000 10294 Rocky Mountain B & T Florence 10/20/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.520 6.520 110 10/19/2000 10386 Rushmore State Bank 05/15/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.400 7.400 318 05/15/2001 10193 TeleBank / E*Trade Bank 05/06/1999 - 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.680 5.660 492 11/05/2001 Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:26 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01t City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Average Purchase CUSIP Investment# Issuer Balance 'Date Par Value Page 4 Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 385 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10264 Triad Bank 09/30/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.450 6.450 91 09/30/2000 10381 Tumberry Bank 05/03/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 306 05/03/2001 10342 United Credit National Bank 10/12/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 6.600 6.600 102 10/11/2000 10389 Universal Savings Bank FSB 05/18/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 411 08/16/2001 10379 Walton Bank & Trust Co 04/20/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.050 7.050 293 04/20/2001 10397 Western Security Bank 06/26/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.600 360 06/26/2001 10196 Winton Savings & Loan 05/07/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 310 05/07/2001 Subtotal and Average 7,674,400.00 7,813,000.00 7,813,000.00 7,813,000.00 6.403 236 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity 066320ZF2 10234 Bankers Trust 10362 Bank of Washington 05/20/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 03/08/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.950 6.083 1,419 05/20/2004 6.950 250 03/08/2001 Subtotal and Average 194,000.00 194,000.00 194,000.00 194,000.00 6.526 822 Negotiable/Transferable CDs 0279999X1 10358 American National B & TC 02/18/2000 100,000.00 100,000.00 74,790.18 6.760 15.799 1,686 02/11/2005 06035ADT7 10072 Bank & Trust of Puerto Rico 01/27/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.300 5.300 1,305 01/27/2004 3 0649999X5 10346 Bank One, Colorado 01/25/2000 100,000.00 100,000.00 74,790.18 6.760 15.798 1,657 01/13/2005 A 15640XBK6 10158 Centura National Bank 03/09/1999 95,000.00 94,762.50 95,000.00 6.000 6.000 2,281 09/09/2006 lV 203584AD9 10071 Community Bank of Ravenswood 01/28/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.350 5.350 1,306 01/28/2004 10029 Cedar Rapids ECU 10/01/1998 100,000.00 100,000.00 89,576.91 5.650 11.935 92 10/01/2000 258115AV6 10041 Doral FSB 12/10/1998 99,000.00 99,000.00 98,384.22 5.350 5.493 1,257 12/10/2003 29874FA32 10134 European American Bank 02/04/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,495 08/04/2004 10031 Farmers Bank 10/02/1998 100,000.00 75,948.98 75,948.98 5.850 13.769 1,188 10/02/2003 30241HXE3 10159 FCC National Bank 03/10/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.700 5.700 1,348 03/10/2004 33847EGE1 10205 Flagstar Bank 05/14/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 682 05/14/2002 32109VAH7 10203 FNB of Lucedale - 05/12/1999 97,000.00 94,432.41 97,000.00 5.500 5.500 681 05/13/2002 10195 FNB of America 05/06/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 674 05/06/2002 356611 FU2060 10168 Fremont Investment & Loan 04/07/1999 97,000.00 92,035.54 97,000.00 5.600 5.600 1,376 04/07/2004 10324 First Bank & Trust 04/28/1999 100,000.00 85,276.39 85,276.39 5.750 12.530 659 04/21/2002 10325 First Union Bank - 02/23/1999 100,000.00 84,801.52 84,801.52 5.820 12.683 630 03/23/2002 39739BUG4060 10162 Greenwood Trust Company DE - 03/17/1999 100,000.00 94,953.00 100,000.00 5.600 5.600 1,355 03/17/2004 10262 Great South Texas Bank 09/15/1999 100,000.00 75,811.23 75,811.23 6.550 15.190 1,488 07/28/2004 10037 Hometown Bank NA 11/20/1998 100,000.00 85,328.46 85,328.46 5.650 12.402 464 10/08/2001 441800AY8060 10167 Household Bank 04/07/1999 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,376 04/07/2004 44921CBN6 10042 IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co 12/23/1998 95,000.00 94,762.50 - 95,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,270 12/23/2003 Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:26 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01r CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Page 5 Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Negotiable/Transferable CDs 45383NA04 10160 Independent Bank W Michigan 03/15/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 5.999 1,342 03/04/2004 47816HAB3 10161 Johnson Bank 03/17/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.250 6.250 3,181 03/17/2009 51803KG35 10078 Lasalle Bank NA 01/25/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 6.000 4,956 01/25/2014 51803AVLO 10327 Lasalle Bank NA 02/03/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 49,892.25 8.210 24.665 3,951 04/26/2011 531554AG8 10166 Libertyville Bank & Trust 04/06/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,364 03/26/2004 509685AC7 10165 Lake Forest Bank & Trust 04/06/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,364 03/26/2004 55256NKS2 10077 M & I Marshall & lisley Bank 01/27/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 94,818.55 8.050 6.076 3,132 01/27/2009 564759LT3 10152 Manufacturers & Traders Trust 03/04/1999 95,000.00 94,762.50 93,114.92 5.500 5.847 2,064 02/24/2006. 552621NWR3060 10151 MBNA America 03/03/1999 97,000.00 92,992.93 97,000.00 5.400 5.400 975 03/03/2003 59020W13F5 10216 Merrill Lynch Bank USA 05/27/1999 95,000,00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,431 06/01/2004 10329 Bank of Mount Vernon 02/26/1999 100,000.00 69,971.36 89,971.36 6.550 15.910 1,901 09/14/2005 10038 Nations Bank (Bamett Bank) 12/01/1998 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.850 5.850 1,128 08/03/2003 64880TGC5060 10136 New South Federal Savings Bank 02/23/1999 97,000.00 93,683.57 - 97,000.00 5.300 5.299 772 08/12/2002 685821CW2060 10034 Orchard Federal Savings Bank 11/04/1998 99,000.00 79,323.75 99,000.00 5.750 5.750 1,221 11/04/2003 680061BK3 10076 Old National Bank 01/28/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 94,772.00 6.000 6.032 3,133 01/28/2009 710198GA4 10133 Peoples Bank 02/10/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,501 08/10/2004 10341 Pony Express Bank 10/13/1999 100,000.00 65,799.53 65,799.53 7.240 21.020 1,632 12/19/2004 743836TD0 10043 Provident Bank 01/21/1999 99,000.00 93,240.18 99,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,481 07/21/2004 10040 Royal Bank of Pennsylvania 12/02/1998 100,000.00 76,325.98 76,325.98 5.550 13.280 1,249 12/02/2003 VQ�� 82661YAG8 10339 Signal Bank N A 11/02/1998 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,249.24 6.500 6.432 1,138 08/13/2003 l� 82668FCS4 10137 Signet Bank 03/01/1999 95,000.00 97,886.10 97,886.10 6.250 5.500 1,215 10/29/2003 798219AB7060 10146 San Jose National Bank 03/03/1999 97,009.00 91,534.05 97,000.00 5.400 5.400 1,341 03/03/2004 10263 South Bay Bank 07/26/1999 100,000.00 88,986.23 88,988.23 6.180 13.125 390 07/26/2001 856284GL2060 10135 State Bank of India 02/12/1999 97,000.00 93,644.77 98,658.70 5.850 5.405 1,095 07/01/2003 853389CG7060 10164 Standard Federal Bank 03/19/1999 97,000.00 92,878.53 97,000.00 5.850 5.850 1,357 03/19/2004 789369HG3 10075 St Francis Bank FSB 01/29/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 94,525.00 6.000 8.067 3,134 01/29/2009 8649999X9 10347 Success National Bank 01/31/2000 100,000.00 79,937.85 79,937.85 6.270 14.114 1,309 01/31/2004 10281 Upstate National Bank 10/05/1999 100,000.00 .. 78,963.99 78,963.99 6.570 14.890 1,210 10/24/2903 10353 U S Bank NA 02/04/2000 100,000.00 74,008.71 74,008.71 7.020 16.505 1,678 02/03/2005 959897EA3 10150 Western Bank PR 03/03/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.400 5.400 794 09/03/2002 10332 Wilmington Trust Co 03/08/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 76,570.64 6.150 14.182 1,335 02/26/2004 Subtotal and Average 4,670,189.12 5,062,000.00 4,747,050.56 4,670,189.12 8.232 1,482 Federal Agency Securities 31331RK38080 10124 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/24/1998 250,000.00 240,225.00 250,000.00 5.800 5.800 1,241 11/24/2003 31331HXXOC 10273 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/30/1999 100,000.00 99,002.00 100,000.00 6.250 6.250 576 01/28/2002 Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:28 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF PM2) SymRept V5.01f CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Page 6 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Securities 31331 HXUB 10282 Federal Farm Credit Bank 07/27/1999 100,000.00 98,130.00 100,000.00 6.380 6.380 940 01/27/2003 313318R68 10382 Federal Farm Credit Bank 05/02/2000 100,000.00 99,804.30 100,000.00. 7.000 - 7.000 670 05/02/2002 3133M6J25C 10054 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/25/1998 150,000.00 144,793.65 150,000.00 5.825 5.825 1,242 11/25/2003 3133M6KY3C 10055 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/25/1998 150,000.00 145,483.65 150,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,242 11/25/2003 3133M6N79C 10057 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/01/1998 100,000.00 96,799.10 100,000.00 5.930 5.930 1,248 12/01/2003 3133M6TV0C 10059 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/22/1998 100,000.00 96,030.40 100,000.00 5.660 5.660 1,269 12/22/2003 3133M6W38C 10060 Federal. Home Loan Bank 12/23/1998 100,000.00 98,167.80 100,000.00 5.710 5.710 1,270 12/23/2003 3133M6GQ5 10063 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/17/1998 100,000.00 96,062.00 100,000.00 5.785 5.785 1,234 11/17/2003 3133M6NC8 10065 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/01/1998 100,000.00 96,344.00 100,000.00 5.910 5.910 1,248 12/01/2003 3133M6PS1 10088 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/10/1998 100,000.00 97,906.00 100,000.00 5.780 5.780 709 06/10/2002 3133M6NX2 10067 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/04/1998 100,000.00 96,500.00 100,000.00 5.970 5.970 1,251 12/04/2003 3134A2D39 10068 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/22/1998 100,000.00 96,031.00 100,000.00 5.820 5.820 1,269 12/22/2003 3133M6K98 10089 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/25/1998 100,000.00 97,110.00 100,000.00 5.640 5.640 877 11/25/2002 3133M8MP0060 10118 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/02/1998 100,000.00 97,281.00 100,000.00 5.770 5.770 884 12/02/2002 3133M6PD4060 10119 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/04/1998 100,000.00 96,250.00 100,000.00 5.875 5.875 1,251 12/04/2003 3133M8P69060 10120 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/04/1998 100,000.00 96,563.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,251 12/04/2003 `3' 3133M6Q68060 10121 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/09/1998 125,000.00 121,797.50 125,000.00 5.860 5.860 891 12/09/2002 3133M6PX0060 10128 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/02/1998 125,000.00 120,038.75 125,000.00 5.795 5.795 1,249 12/02/2003 k 3133M7KY1060 10144 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/24/1999 150,000.00 146,415.00 150,000.00 5.250 5.250 1,333 02/24/2004 a 3133M7U46 10157 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/15/1999 100,000.00 96,328.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,353 03/15/2004 3133M85N0 10170 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/18/1999 100,000.00 97,645.50 100,000.00 6.050 6.050 990 03/18/2003 3133M7XW1C 10171 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/23/1999 100,000.00 97,852.80 100,000.00 5.940 5.940 814 09/23/2002 3133M8N83C 10202 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/12/1999 100,000.00 97,312.40 100,000.00 5.740 5.740 884 11/12/2002 3133M8UA0 10210 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/24/1999 100,000.00 97,781.00 100,000.00 5.685 5.685 892 05/24/2002 3133M5T38 10211 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/24/1999 250,000.00 241,602.60 250,000.00 6.185 6.185 1,423 05/24/2004 3134A3SQ0C 10212 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999. 100,000.00 98,287.80 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 695 05/27/2002 3133M8SD7C 10213 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999 100,000.00 97,657.90 100,000.00 5.930 5.930 879 11/27/2002 3133M8SW5C 10214 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999 100,000.00 -. 97,617.60 100,000.00 5.910 5.910 879 11/27/2002 3133M8SD7 10215 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999 100,000.00 97,420.00 100,000.00 5.930 5.930 879 11/27/2002 3133M8UT9 10227 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/03/1999 100,000.00 97,782.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 885 12/03/2002 3133M8V92C 10228 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/09/1999 100,000.00 97,789.10 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 891 12/09/2002 3133M8ZP2C 10230 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/24/1999 100,000.00 98,631.10 100,000.00 6.250 6.250 723 06/24/2002 3133M6J33060 10239 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/24/1998 115,000.00 110,256.25 115,000.00 5.730 5.730 1,241 11/24/2003 3133M94LC3 10240 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/1999 100,000.00 98,877.70 100,000.00 6.140 6.140 534 12/17/2001 3133M94L3 10242 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/1999 100,000.00 98,848.59 100,000.00 6.140 6.140 534 12/17/2001 3133M9C42 10285 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/13/1999 100,000.00 98,469.00 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 1,473 07/13/2004 Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:26 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01t CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Page 7 Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Investment it Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Securities 3133M9A85 10266 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/09/1999 100,000.00 98,510.29 100,000.00 6.200 6.200 738 07/09/2002 3133M9DD1 10267 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/28/1999 100,000.00 98,778.80 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 1,488 07/28/2004 3133M9B10C 10270 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/12/1999 100,000.00 99,256.80 100,000.00 6.020 6.020 376 07/12/2001 3133M9D90 10271 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/19/1999 100,000.00 99,270.60 100,000.00 6.040 6.040 383 07/19/2001 3133M9FX5C 10272 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/29/1999 100,000.00 98,717.10 100,000.00 6.340 6.340 758 07/29/2002 3133M9NW8 10279 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/25/1999 100,000.00 99,235.00 100,000.00 6.540 8.540 604 02/25/2002 3133M9A85 10280 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/10/1999 100,000.00 98,340.00 100,000.00 6.200 6.200 738 07/09/2002 3133M9KU5 10284 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/16/1999 100,000.00 99,520.00 100,000.00 6.030 6.030 230 02/16/2001 3133M9NW8 10285 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/25/1999 100,000.00 99,220.00 100,000.00 6.540 8.540 604 02/25/2002 3133M6QK7 10286 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/30/1999 200,000.00 196,688.00 198,400.00 6.080 6.431 534 12/17/2001 3133MAGZ6 10334 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/10/2000 100,000.00 99,270.00 100,000.00 7.020 7.020 923 01/10/2003 3133MAGZ60 10335 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/10/2000 100,000.00 99,509.90 100,000.00 7.020 7.020 923 01/10/2003 3133MAQ28 10354 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/15/2000 100,000.00 99,720.00 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 594 02/15/2002 3133MAP52C 10355 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/14/2000 100,000.00 99,801.40 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 594 02/15/2002 3133MASK6 10356 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/22/2000 100,000.00 99,830.00 100,000.00 7.100 7.100 601 02/22/2002 3133MAVF3 10359 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/28/2000`- _ 100,000:00 99,907.00 100,000.00 7.115 - 7.115 607 02/28/2002 3133M9J45 10360 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/16/1999 100,000.00 99,060.00 100,000.00 6.060 6.060 411 08/16/2001 CI 3133M8BD5 10361 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/02/1999 100,000.00 99,685.30 101,088.22 5.170 4.193 86 09/25/2000 3133MAX38C 10363 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/06/2000 100,000.00 99,897.10 100,000.00 7.185 7.185 613 03/06/2002 'D 3133MAX95 10364 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/06/2000 100,000.00 99,650.00 100,000.00 7.015 7.015 432 09/06/2001 3133MAUK3 10365 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/06/2000 - 100,000.00 99,720.00 100,082.60 7.075 6.946 432 09/06/2001 3133MAXZ7 10366 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/13/2000 100,000.00 99,710.00 100,000.00 7.050 7.050 439 09/13/2001 3133MB3U9 10369 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/27/2000 100,000.00 99,703.00 100,000.00 7.050 7.050 634 03/27/2002 3133MB3F2 10370 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/27/2000 100,000.00 99,710.00 100,000.00 6.500 6.500 818 09/27/2002 3133MB2Y2C 10371 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/27/2000 100,000.00 99,876.80 100,000.00 6.500 6.500 634 03/27/2002 3133MB4P9 10372 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/28/2000 100,000.00 99,840.00 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 1,731 03/28/2005 3133MBAA5 10375 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/12/2000 100,000.00 99,761.50 100,000.00 7.030 7.030 650 04/12/2002 3133MBAX5 10376 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/12/2000 100,000.00 99,740.00 100,000.00 7.115 7.115 650 04/12/2002 3133MBAA5 10377 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/12/2000 100,000.00 99,630.00 100,000.00 7.030 7.030 650 04/12/2002 3133MBBZ9 10378 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/18/2000 100,000.00 99,850.00 100,000.00 7.125 7.125 656 04/18/2002 3133MBL54 10390 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/06/2000 100,000.00 100,480.00 100,000.00 7.500 7.500 705 06/06/2002 3134A2D39 10048 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 12/22/1998 100,000.00 96,110.00 100,000.00 5.820 5.820 1,269 12/22/2003 3134A2039C ' 10058 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 12/22/1998 100,000.00 96,504.80 100,000.00 5.820 5.820 1,269 12/22/2003 3134A2G93060 10122 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 01/05/1999 200,000.00 192,938.00 200,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,283 01/05/2004 3134A2L22060 10123 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 01/08/1999 150,000.00 146,437.50 150,000.00 6.000 6.000 919 01/06/2003 3134A3CT1 10155 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 03/08/1999 150,000.00 145,546.50 150,000.00 6.300 6.300 1,346 03/08/2004 Run Date: 07/24/2000. 09:26 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01f City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Page 8 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 385 Maturity Date Federal Agency Securities 3134A3CT1 10156 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 03/08/1999 150,000.00 145,665.00 150,000.00 6.300 6.300 1,346 03/08/2004 3134A3HG4C 10172 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 04/07/1999 100,000.00 97,509.70 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,010 04/07/2003 3134A3NM4 10191 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 05/03/1999 100,000.00 96,406.00 100,000.00 6.105 6.105 1,402 05/03/2004 3134A3PA8C 10200 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 05/10/1999 100,000.00 96,833.40 100,000.00 6.140 6.140 1,409 05/10/2004 3134A3ZM1 10276 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 07/20/1999 100,000.00 99,079.00 100,000.00 6.000 - 6.000 384 07/20/2001 312902HA0C 10298 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10/28/1999 100,000.00 99,607.50 100,000.00 7.010 7.010 849 10/28/2002 3133TGSG5 10301 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 12/01/1998 100,000.00 88,260.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.083 1,126 08/01/2003 312902XD6 10391 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 05/17/2000 100,000.00 99,983.00 100,000.00 7.150 7.150 685 05/17/2002 312902YK9 10392 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 05/30/2000 150,000.00 150,325.20 150,000.00 7.810 7.610 517 11/30/2001 EC2561149 10393 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 05/30/2000 100,000.00 100,985.00 100,000.00 7.610 7.610 517 11/30/2001 EC2590007 10394 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 06/12/2000 100,000.00 100,279.50 100,000.00 8.000 8.000 1,076 06/12/2003 312902YR4 10395 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 05/30/2000 100,000.00 - 100,210.00 100,000.00 7.600 7.600 517 11/30/2001 31364GHP7C 10056 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 11/25/1998 100,000.00 97,079.50 100,000.00 6.020 6.020 1,242 11/25/2003 31384GDH9 10062 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10/22/1998 250,000.00 247,392.50 250,000.00 6.040 6.040 1,208 10/22/2003 31364GDH9060 10114 Federal Nan. Mortgage Assoc. 10/22/1998 250,000.00 241,875.00 250,000.00 6.040 6.040 1,208 10/22/2003 31364GTC3 10143 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 02/18/1999 100,000.00 94,968.00 99,500.00 5.500 5.616 1,327 02/18/2004 • 31364GWN5 10145 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 03/02/1999 250,000.00 240,902.50 250,000.00 6.020 6.020 1,340 03/02/2004 • 31364GJ83 10189 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 04/23/1999 100,000.00 96,250.00 100,000.00 6.020 6.020 1,392 04/23/2004 u� 31364GJ83C 10190 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 04/23/1999 100,000.00 96,524.50 100,000.00 6.020 6.020 1,395 04/26/2004 tom+ 31364GY37 10229 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 08/23/1999 100,000.00 99,261.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 355 06/21/2001 31364GX38 10231 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 06/17/1999 100,000.00 99,284,00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 353 06/19/2001 31384G3C1 10269 Federal Nan. Mortgage Assoc. 07/21/1999 100,000.00 99,157.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 388 07/24/2001 31364G4L0 10277 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 08/05/1999 100,000.00 99,327.00 100,000.00 6.170 6.170 402 08/07/2001 31364CUT3 10349 - Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 01/28/2000 100,000.00 99,574.44 99,449.44 6.700 7.043 572 01/24/2002 86387R2H4C 10274 Sallie Mae Agency Bond - 08/10/1999 100,000.00 99,128.20 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 405 08/10/2001 86387R2P6 10278 Sallie Mae Agency Bond 08/24/1999 100,000.00 99,429.00 100,000.00 6.300 6.300 419 08/24/2001 Subtotal and Average 11,310,186.83 11,365,000.00 11,139,594.72 11,363,500.16 6.276 917 Pass Through Securities 313401TF8010 10093 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 02/18/1998 2,885.00 2,866.17 3,008.30 10.000 31341SZX2060 10094 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 02/18/1998 7,053.04 7,060.02 7,326.44 9.000 31341 RVL4060 10095 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 02/18/1998 7,458.63 7,474.41 7,747.80 9.000 31341 RDX8010 10096 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 02/18/1998 3,835.29 3,843.39 3,988,91 9.000 31341PFR3060 10097 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 02/18/1998 2,019.68 2,025.69 2,141.04 10.500 313401 WX5060 10099 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 02/18/1998 3,999.97 3,914.03 4,130.05 8.500 31282NAG8060 10116 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10/30/1998 2,295.29 2,303.09 2,395.72 12.000 Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:26 7.745 243 03/01/2001 7.495 488 11/01/2001 7.514 457 10/01/2001 7.412 427 09/01/2001 7.607 243 03/01/2001 7.359 549 01/01/2002 10.965 153 12/01/2000 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01f CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Page 9 Portfolio Details - Investments June 30, 2000 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Pass Through Securities 313610EQ6060 10092 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 12/23/1997 8,487.37 8,635.67 8,768.69 8.500 7.494 639 04/01/2002 31361SN51 10098 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 02/18/1998 5,897.40 6,000.37 6,118.50 8.500 7.107 549 01/01/2002 31361T4J0060 10102 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 02/18/1998 2,970.99 3,022.87 3,089.93 8.500 6.967 580 02/01/2002 31364TKP5060 10103 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 02/18/1998 3,177.61 3,173.90 3,288.84 8.250 7.307 1,584 11/01/2004 313815MH6060 10112 Federal Nati. Mortgage Assoc. 06/22/1998 49,865.68 48,178.82 50,364.49 6.500 8.003 0 07/01/2000 31376PGY5 10126 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 12/01/1998 53,547.39 54,488.81 55,807.41 8.500 6.626 1,095 07/01/2003 36216XMV0020 10079 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 08/26/1997 3,871.63 3,961.01 4,015.75 8.500 6.671 471 10/15/2001 313217EBM3020 10080 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 08/26/1997 2,290.32 - 2,343.19 2,375.59 8.500 6.727 532 12/15/2001. 36202AXN2020 10083 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/15/1997 6,961.38 7,052.48 7,222.55 8.500 7.361 537 12/20/2001 362024,0(77020 10084 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/21/1997 9,831.55 9,960.21 10,200.24 8.500 7.495 568 01/20/2002 36217LQQ2020 10085 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/30/1997 13,276.76 13,583.27 13,783.18 8.500 6.657 563 01/15/2002 36216TKS8020 10086 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/30/1997 - 6,452.03 6,600.98 6,694.02 8.500 7.329 410 08/15/2001 36218VD59020 10087 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/12/1997 7,858.80 8,1340.23 8,183.21 8.500 6.685 806 09/15/2002 36217AUE8020 10088 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/12/1997 - 10,943.13 11,103.86 11,305.84 8.000 6.424 622 03/15/2002 36202AYQ4020 10090 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/21/1997 14,641.72 14,710.36 15,117.76 8.000 7.239 599 02/20/2002 36202A5C7020 10091 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/25/1997 10,095.80 10,227.91 10,474.53 8.500 7.000 811 09/20/2002 38215S055020 10100 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 02/18/1998 3,353.92 3,387.08 3,576.36 9.000 7.767 323 05/20/2001 36215N3C6020 10104 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 11,383.35 11,431.23 11,895.64 - 9.000 6.220 318 05/15/2001 36216NJL8020 10105 Govt. National Mortgage. Assoc. 03/17/1998 9,470.27 9,534.60 9,908.39 9.000 7.549 502 11/15/2001 36202A2B2020 10106 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 9,915.04 9,836.41 10,175.47 7.500 6.957 688 05/20/2002 3621614N8020 10107 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 8,523.19 8,595.45 8,928.14 9.000 7.483 502 11/15/2001 362161 DT5020 10108 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/26/1998 - 8,410.33 8,477.10 8,746.88 9.000 7.150 532 12/15/2001 38217LVM5020 10109 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 - 15,025.74 15,246.44 15,514.11 - 8.000 6.352 622 03/15/2002 36218NZQ7020 10110 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 10,794.36 10,952.91 11,172.23 8.000 6.344 744 07/15/2002 36202AZU4020 10111 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 13,461.30 13,637.45 14,216.49 8.500 7.513 658 04/20/2002 36202AW52020 10236 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/21/1997 6,924.03 7,014.64 7,183.88 8.500 6.624 507 11/20/2001 Subtotal and Average 381,613.12 336,957.99 338,661.75 348,866.44 7.138 577 Total Investments and Average 24,230,369.07 Run Date: 07/24/2000 •09:26 24,770,957.99 24,232,307.03 24,389,555.72 6.706 801 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.01f SymPro City of National City Activity Report Sorted By Brokers June 1, 2000 - June 30, 2000 Par Value Par Value City of National City Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases CUSIP Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits Sales/Maturities or Withdrawals Ending Balance Brokers: Finance 500 Inc Certificates of Deposit - Monthly Subtotal and Balance 383,000.00 383,000.00 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity Subtotal and Balance 95,000.00 95,000.00 Negotiable/Transferable CDs Subtotal and Balance 3,888,000.00 3,888,000.00 Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 1,500,000.00 1,500,000.00 Pass Through Securities Subtotal and Balance 53,547.39 53,547.39 Brokers Subtotal 23.897% 5,919,547.39 0.00 0.00 5,919,547.39 `' Brokers: Gilford Securities Inc Federal Agency Securities 3133MBL54 10390 Federal Home Loan Bank 7.500 06/08/2000 100,000.00 0.00 EC2590007 10394 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 8.000 06/12/2000 100,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 3,350,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 3,550,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 14.331%, 3,350,000.00 200,000.00 0.00 3,550,000.00 Brokers: Multi -Bank Securities Inc Certificates of Deposit - Monthly Subtotal and Balance Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:29 300,000.00 300,000.00 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.01f CUSIP City of National City Activity Report June 1, 2000 - June 30, 2000 Par Value Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits Sales/Maturities or Withdrawals Ending Balance Page 2 Negotiable/Transferable CDs Subtotal and Balance 1,074,000.00 1,074,000.00 Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 1,665,000.00 1,665,000.00 Pass Through Securities 36216XMV0020 10079 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/20/2000 0.00 273.55 36217EBM3020 10080 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/20/2000 0.00 146.34 313615MF0060 10081 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 7.000 06/27/2000 0.00 3,488.78 36202AXN2020 10083 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/21/2000 0.00 448.79 36202AX77020 10084 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/21/2000 0.00 586.63 36217LQQ2020 10085 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/20/2000 0.00 694.55 36216TKS8020 10086 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/20/2000 0.00 450.29 36218VD59020 10087 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/20/2000 0.00 296.61 36217AUE8020 10088 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 06/20/2000 0.00 408.61 36202AYQ4020 10090 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 06/21/2000 0.00 755.69 36202A5C7020 10091 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/21/2000 0.00 381.82 313610E06060 10092 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. - 8.500 06/27/2000 0.00 1,093.67 313401TF8010 10093 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10.000 06/19/2000 0.00 425.65 31341SZX2060 10094 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 9.000 06/19/2000 0.00 515.24 31341 RVL4060 10095 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 9.000 06/19/2000 0.00 451.64 31341 RDX8010 10096 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 9.000 06/19/2000 0.00 221.05 31341PFR3060 10097 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10.500 06/19/2000 0.00 2,076.45 31361SN51 10098 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/27/2000 0.00 305.06 313401 WX5060 10099 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 8.500 06/19/2000 0.00 354.70 36215SQ55020 10100 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 06/21/2000 0.00 357.08 31361T4J0060 10102 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/27/2000 0.00 216.01 31364TKP5060 10103 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 8.250 06/27/2000 0.00 488.84 36215N3C6020 10104 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 06/20/2000 0.00 1,326.01 36216NJL8020 10105 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 06/20/2000 0.00 702.33 36202A2B2020 10106 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 7.500 06/21/2000 0.00 488.24 3821614N8020 10107 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 06/20/2000 0.00 547.08 362161 DT5020 10108 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 06/20/2000 0.00 561.32 36217LVM5020 10109 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc.. 8.000 06/20/2000 0.00 706.72 36218NZ07020 10110 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 06/20/2000 0.00 474.75 36202AZU4020 10111 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 06/21/2000 0.00 1,527.38 313615MH6060 10112 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 6.500 06/27/2000 0.00 23,162.39 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.01f Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:29 CUSIP City of Ns. .al City Activity Report June 1,2000-June 30,2000 Par Value Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits Sales/Maturities or Withdrawals Ending Balance Page 3 Brokers: Multi -Bank Securities Inc Pass Through Securities 31282NAG8060 10116 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 36202AW52020 10236 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. Subtotal and Balance 12.000 06/19/2000 8.500 06/21/2000 0.00 358.57 0.00 472.77 328,305.32 0.00 44,742.61 283,562.71 Brokers Subtotal 13.413% 3,367,305.32 0.00 44,742.61 3,322,562.71 Brokers: Mischler Financial Group Inc Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 1,950,000.00 1,950,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 7.872% 1,950,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,950,000.00 Brokers: Morgan Keegan Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 400,000.00 400,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 1.615% 400,000.00 0.00 0.00 400,000.00 Brokers: PaineWebber Inc Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 700,000.00 700,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 2.828% 700,000.00 0.00 0.00 700,000.00 Brokers: U.S. Sterling Capital Corp. Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10217 Old Florida Bank - 5.700 06/02/2000 0.00 99,000.00 10220 Peoples Bank of Kentucky 5.750 08/05/2000 0.00 99,000.00 10221 Security State Bk of Wanamingo 5.750 08/09/2000 0.00 99,000.00 10222 Habersham Bank 5.750 06/09/2000 0.00 99,000.00 10388 First Financial Bank 7.750 06/02/2000 99,000.00 . 0.00 10396 Peoples Bank of Kentucky 7.500 08/05/2000 99,000.00 - 0.00 Run Date: 07/24/2000 - 09:29 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.01f CUSIP City of National City Activity Report June 1, 2000 - June 30, 2000 Par Value Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits Sales/Maturities or Withdrawals Ending Balance Page 4 Brokers: U.S. Sterling Capital Corp. Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10397 Western Security Bank 10398 Boundary Water Community Bank Subtotal and Balance 7.600 06/26/2000 7.600 06/30/2000 99,000.00 0.00 99,000.00 0.00 7,130,000.00 396,000.00 398,000.00 7,130,000.00 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity Subtotal and Balance 99,000.00 99,000.00 Negotiable/Transferable CDs Subtotal and Balance 100,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 29.587% 7,329,000.00 396,000.00 100,000.00 396,000.00 7,329,000.00 Brokers: Vining -Sparks IBG Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 1,600,000.00 - Brokers Subtotal 6.459%. 1,600,000.00 Run Date: 07/24/2000.09:29 Total 100.000%. 24,815,852.71 0.00 598,000.00 1,600,000.00 0.00 1,800,000.00 440,742.61 24,771,110.10 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF DA) SymRept V5.01f CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CONSOLIDATED CASH REPORT ALL FUNDS June 30, 2000 FUND FUND TITLE ENDING NUMBER BALANCE 001 GENERAL FUND 2,742,088.21 103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 218,147.74 106 GRANT - CA LITERACY CAMPAIGN 876.09 107 RETIREMENT FUND 489.16 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 77,006.37 109 GAS TAXES FUND 1,020,129.58 110 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUND 40,000.00 113 CULTURAL ARTS FUND 75,000.00 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND 11,995.99 120. PALN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 71,998.41 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 11,791,238.53 126 FIRE DEPT ACTIVITIES FUND 248.11 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 172,572.57 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 117,379.48 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 11,044.27 145 JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND 6,977.44 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 102,377.33 157 GRANT- SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 112,608.55 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 8,466.50 159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE 149,980.12 169 GRANT - LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK 1,223.75 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT 17,135.35 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 287,853.54 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT 14,512.61 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT CONTRACT 32,842.41 176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME 41,276.83 178 POLICE HAT BADGES 36.28 179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND 834.76 183 LITERACY INIATIVES VI 1,991.68 189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 937,845.38 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1303 519,139.30 195 LANDSCAPE RESERVE 494,413.01 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 709,316.28 197 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT RESERVE 50,000.00 198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE 28,134.94 199 SOUTH COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 18,308.00 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1304 600,574.01 203 PARK SECURITY/GTE LEASE 28,000.00 205 YOUTH SERVICES MATERIALS GRANT 0.57 207 CLLS MATCHING FUNDS 367.08 208 FY 99-00 SUPP. LAW ENFORECMENT (SLESF) 77,858.38 209 FY 99-00 LITERACY INTIATIVES VIII 46,380.96 210 FY 99-00 F.U.L.F.I.L.L. 9,750.00 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 52,426.60 214 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND 100,000.00 215 STREET TREES REPLACEMENT FUND 250.58 303 CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND 299,571.00 304 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 100,000.00 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CONSOLIDATED CASH REPORT ALL FUNDS June 30, 2000 FUND FUND TITLE ENDING NUMBER BALANCE 307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND 1,421,582.22 308 GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB 108,276.54 312 STP LOCALfTRANSNET HIGHWAY 403,670.75 315 FY98 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) 37,339.00 343 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP 37,026.95 363 SECURITY & FIRE ALARM REGULATION FUND 35,972.50 552 TDA 94,726.89 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 340,962.90 627 LIABILITY INSURANCE FUND 3,602,399.15 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE 227,775.58 630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 1,518,774.09 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING FUND 252,011.01 632 INFORMATION SERVICES 1,094.04 633 UNEMPLOYEMENT INSURANCE RESERVE 70,000.00 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVCS FUND 709,424.71 718 TRUST & AGENCY 42,019.79 719 1911 ACT IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1,424.52 721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 49,688.89 723 SISTER CITY 820.00 30,155,657.28 /to enai MONTHLY STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS FOR THE MONTH ENDING JUNE FUND NUMB ER FUND TITLE JUNE YTD.JUN 001 GENERAL FUND 588,772.61 20,333,666.26 102 TECHNOLOGY FUND 0.00 136.00 103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 0.00 755.00 104 LIBRARY FUND 20,850.87 463,903.53 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 24,296.57 574,435.97 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,084.57 66,045.05 109 GAS TAXES FUND 0.00 917,231.47 110 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUND 0.00 40,000.00 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 0.00 64,455.86 112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND 0.00 97,192.20 113 CULTURAL ARTS FUND 0.00 75,000.00 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 100.00 7,179.00 120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 7,916.44 61,971.51 123 GRANT -FAMILIES FOR LITERACY 0.00 8,735.00 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 558,659.54 4,682,239.00 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 0.00 33,404.35 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 4,103.71 95,143.31 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 0.00 56,257.92 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 0.00 4,820.00 147 GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM 0.00 57,172.00 153 GRANT -COPS UNIVERSAL HIRING 0.00 66,916.67 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 0.00 93,525.09 157 GRANT-SUPPL. LAW ENF. (SLESF) 0.00 449.49 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 7,976.50 40,689.00 159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE 0.00 63,000.00 167 GRANT -NC SUPPR. OF DRUG ABUSE 0.00 53,935.00 169 GRANT -LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK 0.00 1,303.32 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 0.00 27,780.50 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 0.00 42,899.10 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT 0.00 39,238.00 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 0.00 112,012.00 176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME 32,014.73 97,203.33 178 POLICE HAT BADGES 36.28 36.28 180 FY97 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) 0.00 178,390.00 182 COPS GRANT PART II 0.00 156,309.30 184 LIBRARY COMPUTER CENTER 0.00 6,331.00 188 GRANT - HIDTA 0.00 103,518.67 189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 0.00 410,000.00 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1303 0.00 16,540.05 191 GRANT - STOP PROJECT 7,000.00 248,277.26 192 LEASE ESCROW FUND 0.00 36,920.93 193 COPS GRANT PART III 0.00 11,546.64 194 LITERACY INITIATIVES VII 0.00 100,750.00 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 0.00 200,000.00 198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE 0.00 42,514.96 199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 0.00 227,165.00 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1304 0.00 36,301.89 201 NCJPFA DEBT SERVICE FUND 0.00 682,413.29 202 FY98 COPS MORE 0.00 186,389.00 203 PARK SECURITY/GTE LEASE 0.00 28,000.00 204 GALE GRANT 17,115.24 64,906.19 205 YOUTH SERVICES MATERIALS GRANT 0.00 10,000.00 206 GATES LEARNING FOUNDATION FUND 0.00 20,363.00 207 CLLS MATCHING FUNDS FY99-00 0.00 50,336.35 208 FY99-00 SUPP. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) 0.00 122,132.86 209 FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII 0.00 87,360.00 210 FY99-00 F.U.L.F.I.L.L. 0.00 45,000.00 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 5,552.50 58,823.44 212 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND 0.00 100,000.00 /9q4-V FUND NUMBER FUND TITLE JUNE YTD.JUN 215 STREET TREES REPLACEMENT FUND 0.00 1,179.00 301 GRANT-C.D.B.G. 0.00 704,582.16 302 CDC PAYMENTS 32,199.10 459,758.00 303 CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND 0.00 299,571.00 304 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 0.00 100,000.00 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 0.00 795,094.98 312 STP LOCAUTRANSNET HIGHWAY 0.00 5,922.47 314 OTS GRANT 14,195.00 77,020.50 315 FY98 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) 0.00 183,809.00 343 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP 0.00 1,076.00 347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT 0.00 9,431.32 363 SECURITY & FIRE ALARM REGULATION FUND 0.00 35,972.50 552 TDA 163,809.59 2,039,317.16 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 0.00 1,478,809.27 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 124,598.32 1,413,403.51 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 0.00 217,340.86 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 0.00 327,934.86 630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 0.00 1,718,335.39 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 0.00 214,286.00 632 INFORMATION SERVICES 0.00 418,946.00 633 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE RESERVE 0.00 70,000.00 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 0.00 1,021,417.01 718 TRUST & AGENCY -500.00 96,952.54 721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 0.00 2,752.61 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1,615,781.57 43,201,933.18 / 6 04/ vamEyrrawhi TajamURSEMENTS FU�Ip NO FUND TITLE JUNE YTD.JUN GENERAL FUND 001 2244,428.87 21,139,399.98 102 TECHNOLOGY FUND 0.00 1,285,642.24 103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 100,883.00 788,707.33 104 LIBRARY FUND 89,972.41 938,577.80 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 78,237.19 692,793.80 107 RETIREMENT FUND 0.00 (229.98) 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 10,706.03 26,096.52 109 GAS TAXES FUND 168,275.05 1,479,552.16 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 5,034.38 73,435.12 112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND 9,702.47 129,458.94 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 27.00 9,623.10 120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 2,917.61 4,628.22 123 GRANT -FAMILIES FOR LITERACY 2,839.80 19,002.13 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 75,734.44 3,923,242.54 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 1,403.20 5,479.56 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 0.00 58,895.56 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 0.00 56,257.92 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 695.62 3,763.50 147 GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM 8,124.57 59,942.34 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 7,364.75 54,456.01 157 GRANT-SUPPL. LAW ENF. (SLESF) 0.00 61,028.20 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 0.00 31,237.50 159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE 1,632.00 22,136.43 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 1,487.97 24,593.02 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 3,816.99 28,403.82 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT 2,822.84 24,770.98 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 9,809.74 78,954.72 176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME 0.00 55,926.50 179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND 20.11 901.15 180 FY97 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) 0.00 31,519.00 182 COPS GRANT PART II 14,221.71 117,451.23 184 LIBRARY COMPUTER CENTER 0.00 13,676.75 185 COPS MORE 97-CM-WX-0949 111,120.00 111,120.00 188 GRANT - HIDTA 11,722.53 84,970.50 189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 17,127.58 85,323.53 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1303 114.56 9,703.26 191 GRANT - STOP PROJECT 11,890.84 162,367.05 192 LEASE ESCROW FUND 0.00 226,038.59 193 COPS GRANT PART III 2,597.13 21,923.66 194 LITERACY INITIATIVES VII ' 0.00 202,413.44 195 LANDSCAPE RESERVE 6,115.73 10,975.83 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 22,847.57 90,699.98 198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE 1,214.23 32,332.24 199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 0.00 208,857.00 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1304 3,174.55 178,540.73 201 NCJPFA DEBT SERVICE FUND 0.00 686,325.79 202 FY98 COPS MORE 0.00 63,129.00 204 GALE GRANT 2,653.72 74,554.66 205 YOUTH SERVICES MATERIALS GRANT 849.83 9,999.43 206 GATES LEARNING FOUNDATION FUND 7,830.60 20,363.00 207 CLLS MATCHING FUNDS FY99-00 14,376.13 50,498.95 208 FY99-00 SUPP. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) 0.00 44,274.48 209 FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII 22,889.39 52,316.45 210 FY99-00 F.U.L.F.I.L.L. 12,500.00 35,250.00 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 4,113.97 7,378.53 214 EVERY 15 MINUTES GRANT FY99-00 1,500.00 2,820.30 215 STREET TREES REPLACEMENT FUND 928.42 928.42 218 HIGH INTENSITY PREVENTION ZONE 0.00 301 GRANT-C.D.B.G. 97,880.15 455,750.00,549.62 302 CDC PAYMENTS 39,864.75 361,000.53 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 110,277.14 1,280,565.33 308 GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB 1,286.69 1,406.29 312 STP LOCALITRANSNET HIGHWAY 0.00 34,147.54 313 GRANT-CMAQ 0.00 2,465.73 314 OTS GRANT 2,800.00 71,782.22 14 315 FY98 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) 0.00 6,470.00 347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT 8,734.42 16,881.58 348 STATE GRANT 1,033.50 11,509.96 19 011I FUND TITLE JUNE YTD.JUN FIIN[IIVC� 1UA 115,914.20 1,883,598.83 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 185,549.89 1,424,066.52 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 41,896.01 1,520,589.97 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 34,010.71 235,671.91 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 16,887.95 121,761.15 630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 101,035.33 828,024.46 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 51,422.69 82,701.95 632 INFORMATION SERVICES 66,891.61 471,724.03 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 75,030.86 1,603,111.56 718 TRUST & AGENCY 12,617.34 66,896.59 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 4,058,857.77 44,500,104.68 vais Date City of National City Pooled Investment Transactions Report For the Month of June 2000 Description Institution Ref. No. Amount 2 Withdrawal LAIF 797809 (200,000.00) 6 Withdrawal LAIF 408616 (200,000.00) 8 Withdrawal LAIF 740683 (300,000.00) 22 Withdrawal LAIF 569501 , (200,000.00) 26 Deposit LAIF 354893 1,200,000.00 30 Withdrawal LAIF 333619 (300,000.00) 0600 Pagel 7/24/00 a2i 2/ City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 (ITEM TITLE PREPARED BY CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Art Flores Michael R. Dalla, CI\iP R TMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Art Flores arises from an occurrence on June 22, 2000 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on June 30, 2000 . (-Environmental Review __XAUA Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Resolution No. A-200 (9/8o) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Lucila Perez PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CMJ 1 RTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Lucila Perez arises from an occurrence on March 24, 2000 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on June 19, 2000 . Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A Viva STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD I C N/A MISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Account No. Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) .MEETING DATE ** REFER TO AGENDA ITEM #1 ** City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (MILE OF CARS) PREPARED BY ARTMENT Paul Desrochers COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Executive Direct COMMISSION (CDC) EXPLANATION Adoption of this Resolution will implement the 2000-01 levy and collection of assessments for costs of maintenance of improvements to the Landscape Maintenance District (LIVID). The Resolution confirms that the required Public Hearing has been held and legally noticed. The Resolution confirms the assessments listed in the Engineer's Report and orders that the assessment breakdown contained in the report be levied by the County of San Diego Auditors Office. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Maintenance costs for fiscal year 2000-01 operation of the LIVID are estimated at $99,600 and fees to property owners range from $345 to $6,805. STAFF RECOMMENDATiON Adopt Resolution. Account No. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. A -zoo (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. - 96 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN A SPECIAL MAINTENANCE DISTRICT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City, California, has initiated proceedings for the levy of the annual assessment in a special maintenance district created pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Landscaping Act"), Article XIIID of the Constitution of the State of California and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act (Government Code Section 53750 and following; Article XIIID and such implementation act may be referred to collectively herein as "Article XIIID"), in a special maintenance district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "District"); and WHEREAS, at this time all notice and public hearing requirements have been met relating to the levy of the annual assessments; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received a report from the Assessment Engineer (the "Assessment Engineer's Report") and this City Council is now satisfied with the assessment and diagram and all other matters as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report as now submitted for final consideration and approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City as follows: RECITALS Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. PROCEDURES Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessment have been undertaken in accordance with both the Act and Article XIIID inasmuch as the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 2000-01 are not proposed to be increased over the assessments previously authorized to be levied. DETERMINATION AND CONFIRMATION Section 3. The final assessment and diagram for the proceedings, as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report, is hereby approved and confirmed. Resolution No. 2000-96 August 1, 2000 Page Two Based upon the Assessment Engineer's Report and the testimony and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following determinations regarding the assessments proposed to be imposed: a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each individual parcel assessedhas been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the operations and maintenance expenses. b. The assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel. c. Only the special benefits have been assessed. d. There are no publicly owned parcels within the District. The assessments for the District contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report for the next fiscal year are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in such Assessment Engineer's Report. ORDERING OF MAINTENANCE Section 4. The public interest and convenience requires, and this legislative body does hereby order the maintenance work to be made and performed as said maintenance work is set forth in the Assessment Engineer's Report and as previously declared and set forth in the Resolution of Intention. FILING WITH CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER Section 5. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk, with a certified copy to be flied in the Office of the City Engineer. Said diagram and assessment and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. FILING WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later than the 3rd Monday in August. ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL Section 7. After the filing of the diagram and assessment the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment. Resolution No. 2000-96 August 1, 2000 Page Three COLLECTION AND PAYMENT Section 8. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. FISCAL YEAR Section 9. The assessments as above authorized and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2000 and ending June 30, 2001. PASSED and ADOPTED this 1" day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: 0.) Ytt4: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney >STAFF RECO MENDATION MEETING DATE ** REFER TO AGENDA ITEM #2 ** City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 35 /ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION APPROVING A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (CDC) SALE OF LAND TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SOCAL) PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Paul Desrochers DEPARTMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Executive Directo COMMISSION (CDC) The property, assessor parcel number 557-440-56, is a landlocked piece of land located in the fourteen hundred block between Sheryl Lane and Q Avenue (refer to attached picture and map). A large storm drain runs through the site running in an east -west direction along part of the property and north south along another part. In 1993 the property was purchased by the CDC as surplus property from the City of National City and transferred by Quitclaim Deed. In 1995 the CDC proposed the development of several large duplex units on the site. However, the neighborhood residents strongly opposed anything but open -space or single family homes. The site has not been marketable because of its steep topography and adverse location. A recent appraisal values the land at $1.10 per square foot for a total of $40,500. The best use would be to merge the land with abutting property. In accordance with the CDC approved development plan with SoCal, the land is proposed for ancillary uses associated with the Q Avenue rehabilitation project. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Per the approved Disposition and Development Agreement, the CDC will provide the land for one -dollar ($1.00) cost and SoCal will construct parking, fencing and landscaping. Approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below } 1. Report pertaining to the sales transaction of property. 2. Map Account No. Resolution No. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 — 95 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (CDC) SALE OF LAND TO SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SoCal) WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission (CDC) owns a parcel of land identified as assessors parcel number 557-440-56 located in the fourteen hundred block between Sheryl Lane and "Q" Avenue; and WHEREAS, the CDC has an approved development plan with Southern California Housing Development Corporation ("SoCal") to rehabilitate the apartments along "Q" Avenue including the revitalization of the street and parking areas which plan includes the sale of the aforementioned parcel to SoCal for One Dollar; and WHEREAS, Section 33433 of the Health and Safety Code requires the City Council to approve the sale of any property acquired by the CDC in whole or in part with tax increment monies; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was properly held on August 1, 2000, regarding the sale of the aforementioned parcel. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of National City hereby finds as follows: 1. That the sale of the subject property will assist in the elimination of blight and provide housing for low or moderate income persons. 2. The consideration is not less than the fair reuse value at the use and with the covenants and conditions and development costs authorized by the sale or lease. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby approves the sale of APN 557-440-56 to SoCal for One Dollar, as well as the development of said parcel by SoCal. PASSED and ADOPTED this ls` day of August, 2000. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: vJ Michael R. Dalla George Miser, III City Clerk City Attorney REPORT PERTAINING TO THE SALES TRANSACTION OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE FOURTEEN HUNDRED BLOCK BETWEEN SHERYL LANE AND Q AVE. This property lies west of Sheryl Lane and east of (behind) a row of apartment buildings on the east side of Q Avenue in National City, Ca. A large storm drain runs through the site running in an east -west direction and a north -south direction. The parcel contains approximately 32,795 square feet, however it is land locked except to adjacent parcels. The zoning is CT (tourist commercial). In 1993 the property was purchased by the Community Development Commission (CDC) as surplus property from the City of National City and transferred by Quitclaim Deed. In approximately 1995 the CDC proposed the development of a series of large duplex units on subject site. However, the neighborhood residents strongly opposed anything but single-family ownership type housing. The site has not been marketable because of adverse noise, steep topography, and location. A recent appraisal identifies the highest and best use is to merge the property with adjacent properties. The appraised value is $1.10 per square foot for a total of $40,500. It is the purpose of this sale to transfer the property to Southern California Housing Development Corporation (SoCal) for one dollar ($1.00). SoCal will utilize the property in accordance with the CDC approved Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) which calls for the development of parking and ancillary uses for the area. The DDA requires the removal of some parking in front of the apartments facing Q Avenue in order to redesign the street. SoCal is willing to replace and add parking on subject land with CDC's participation being the land value. LLL11991005) nl0oleoynL pmlpug RQ uw.OoS PIIoddy siolo9 luH 914110499 0 a J V"1 30 OHONVH — 991 dVW U STREET r t -c art r O JSTREET m $ I. EL h a® It '• 1."•W : Wry ){ M I w t +7 1 �G ) lI I l•JJ.? 1/1 1 • I{4 I Mm I u. M 1 .. w I L a th a F 3 ®� • rreVs3o i✓ • 8855 01 3 rn 600..07 A a • W 0 N m n St SHERYL LANE oP At stir •1 I • N t0 ..OS—�X Yl/ 0 r •r _ l 13 m (� us 8 0 MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 16 ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 111 W. 9TH STREET (APPLICANT: TIM KOLSET) (CASE FILE NO.: CUP-2000-9) PREPARED BY Larry PariLsss istant Planner DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The project involves stealth installation of 12 wireless panel antennas on an existing 2-story warehouse, Sid's Carpet Barn. To accommodate the antennas, the parapet walls at the corners of the building will be added onto by four feet in height. None of the panel antennas will rise above the heightened parapet walls. This plan conforms to the City's Design Guidelines. In addition, a four -inch tall GPS antenna will be mounted on top of the wall at the southwest corner of the building. Supporting equipment will not be visible. The conditions of approval are standard for new wireless communications facilities. They require re- moval of equipment that becomes obsolete and encourage co -location of future proposed wireless communications facilities. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to approve the variance. Vote: Ayes - Martinelli, Baca, Detzer Absent—Ungab, Valderamma, Godshalk Abstain - Parra ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 14-2000 2. Location Map A-2�00 i9.991 RESOLUTION NO. 14-2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AT 111 W. 9 STREET. APPLICANT: TIM KOLSET, WFI. CASE FILE NO. CUP-2000-9 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit application to allow a wireless communications facility at 111 W. 9th Street at a duly advertised public hearing held on June 19, 2000, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. CUP-2000-9 which is maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on June 19, 2000, support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since antennas will be located on an existing structure, and mechanical equipment will be placed inside the building. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the unmanned wireless facility is located at the intersection of a collector and a local street, and will generate little new traffic. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the proposed antennas will be either concealed behind parapets or integrated with the exterior of the parapets, and will not be obvious from nearby properties. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the facility will enhance the availability of wireless communication channels. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Condi«onal Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes. 2. Except as required by conditions of approval, plans for future permits shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director in conformance with Exhibit A-2'd Revision, Case File No. CUP-2000-9, dated June 9, 2000. 3. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 4. Use authorized by this Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to wireless communication facilities in accordance with Exhibit A- 2❑d Revision, Case File No. CUP-2000-9, dated June 9, 2000. 5. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 6. The permittee shall not object to co -locating additional facilities of other communication companies and sharing the project site, provided such shared use does not result in substantial technical or quality -of -service impairment for the permitted use. In the event a dispute arises with regard to co -locating with other existing or potential users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of the applicant and/or the complaining user. This condition in no way obligates the City to approve any co -location proposal if it is determined by the City not to be desirable in a specific case. 7. Any antennas, equipment or facilities that become obsolete shall be removed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of July 17, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: MARTINELLI, BACA, DETZER NAYS: ABSENT: UNGAB, VALDERRAMA, GODSHALK ABSTAIN: PARRA IOe /0/0 /0/2 10/4 /028 1018 20 102224 1oggi28 SCALE: 1" = 200' r NORTH 92 91/2 921 9266 eN eo 910 99? 928 938 goo ,V° /0/5 /019 /021-23 ee /004 /0/4 /031 /0/8 /024 /028 /036 1240: w 0 0 I __"""mil W 8th 8 ST N eo 1 •e 829 m • Existing --t Warehouse 90t° 913 92/ 921N 7 939- 91 945 900 90k 908 mo (10th STREET) u & 105 •oe t /0/0 /0/8 /0/9 /027 /926 d so N N es Ile 909 NAP 999 STREET CM °°! ! I la I I I r"° 11_ N N PROJECT SITE i• PROPOSED ANTENNAS um NE NE ZONE BOUNDARY LOCATION MAP 111 W. 9'h Street CUP-2000-9 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 6/05/2Ofl0 INITIAL HEARING: 6/19/2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION — DENIAL OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE TO EXPAND A MOTEL FROM 39 TO 50 ROOMS WITHOUT THE REQUIRED SWIMMING POOL AT 1125 E. PLAZA BLVD. (APPLICANT: TSAN-TANG HUNG) (CASE FILE NO.: CUP-2000-13, Z-2000-4) PREPARED X Jon Cain - Associate Plann A T E T Planning EXPLANATION This project involves the proposed expansion of an existing 39-unit motel, the Grand Plaza Inn. The proposal involves adding guest rooms to the existing building and constructing a new building in what is currently a surplus parking area to include a new lobby, manager's unit, and guest rooms, for a total of 50 units. The proposed addition would have a stucco finish and tile, hipped roofs to match the existing building. The Planning Commission found no special circumstances that justified a variance and voted to deny the project at the public hearing. Commissioners also mentioned that there was not a need for more motel facilities in the project area. No members of the public spoke at the public hearing other than the project architect, who argued that the size of the site is inadequate for a pool. Following the hearing, the applicant asked for reconsideration of revised plans which included a swimming pool, but did not meet minimum parking standards. The Planning Commission chose not to schedule a new hearing, which would have been necessary to consider the new plans. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Account No. Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to deny the Conditional Use Permit and Variance. Vote: Ayes — Martinelli, Baca, Detzer Absent — Ungab, Valderrama, Godshalk Abstain — Parra ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 13-2000 2. Location Map Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 13-2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS TO EXPAND A MO 1EL FROM 39 TO 50 ROOMS WITHOUT THE REQUIRED SWIMMING POOL AT 1125 E. PLAZA BOULEVARD. APPLICANT: TSAN-TANG HUNG. CASE FILE NOS. CUP-2000-13, Z-2000-4. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California considered conditional use permit and variance applications to expand a motel from 39 to 50 rooms without the required swimming pool at 1125 E. Plaza Boulevard at the public hearing held on June 19, 2000, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the staff reports contained in Case File Nos. CUP-2000-13 and Z-2000-4, which are maintained by the City, and incorporated herein by reference; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on June 19, 2000 fail to support the following findings, required by the Municipal Code for granting any conditional use permit and variance: that the proposed use deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or welfare and that because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, location and surroundings, the strict application of Title 18 of the Municipal Code (Zoning) deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zone classification, and that the required variance is subject to conditions which will assure that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on June 19, 2000, support the following fmdings: 1. That the proposed use is not deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or welfare, since there already exists an abundance of motel units in the City as well as CT (Tourist Commercial) zoning in place to encourage hotel/motel development in other areas; and since this project is located in an area approximately one-half mile removed from the nearest freeway and is thus not as accessible as other motel sites; and since the project will not provide a swimming pool, a desirable amenity. 2. That there are no special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, location and surroundings, because of which strict application of Title 18 of the Municipal Code (Zoning) would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zone classification, since the proposed lot is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the required swimming pool. 3. That the required variance is not subject to conditions which will assure that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitation upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby denies Conditional Use Permit application no. CUP-2000-13 and Variance application no. Z-2000-4. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council; and, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set,..or review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day ofiat City Counci meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of June 19, 2000 by the following vote: AYES: MARTINELLI, BACA, DETZER NAYS: ABSENT: UNGAB, VALDERRAMA, GODSHALK ABSTAIN: PARRA a LEY ^N 0000 728 at eo LAA Z 5 /027 /029 00 5 //39 //4/ /143 733 O 50 09 70 2/3 /09 d/ ///3 2 7 22/ 223 /0/ /04 % ti% 225227 000 229206 /153115926/ 1/53/I69 //7/ //73 I • g 723 e. 1 e -- so g o MAP v 12 73/ItI a a w V.a a Iss ea so so so so m I 166 4 CO 9th ST. .s I I IN slay RT io 9/3 ale 9/5 RM-1-PD 924 e PROJECT SITE wzw ZONE BOUNDARY SCALE: 1" = 200' NORTH LOCATION MAP 1125 E. Plaza Blvd. CUP-2000-13 Z-2000-4 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 6/5/2000 INITIAL HEARING: 6/19/2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 18 ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION — CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADULT SCHOOL CLASSROOMS AT 300 E. 15TH STREET (APPLICANT: NATIONAL CITY ADULT SCHOOL) (CASE FILE NO.: CUP-2000-17) PREPARED BYJon Cain - Associate Planner=PARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The applicant proposes to use the former site of the Philippino American Council of National City (PACNC) Community Center to conduct adult school classes. Proposed classes include Computer Repair, Certified Nurses Assistant Training, English as a Second Language (ESL), Citizenship, Adult Basic Education, GED, and Senior Adult classes. An attendance of 30-50 students is anticipated initially at classes to be conducted between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. No change to the exterior of the structures is proposed; the school will occupy the existing buildings. Administrative offices, classrooms and teacher's offices will be located on the site. The adult school is expected to be a short-term use, since the property is part of a proposed Fire Station site. The Planning Commission voted to approve the project at the public hearing. The Commission discussed concerns voiced by citizens present at the public hearing regarding noise, property maintenance, and parking. Conditions of approval address those concerns. The adult school intends to shuttle some students from the 24th Street campus, and school officials anticipate that the existing parking area will be sufficient. Environmental Review x N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Aga Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to approve the Conditional Use Permit. Vote: Ayes — Parra, Martinelli, Baca, Detzer Absent: Ungab, Valderrama, Godshalk ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 11-2000 2. Location Map Resolution No. .A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 11-2000 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW ADULT SCHOOL CLASSROOMS AT 300 E. 15TH STREET. APPLICANT: NATIONAL CITY ADULT SCHOOL. CASE FILE NO. CUP-2000-17 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit application to allow adult school classrooms at 300 E. 15th Street at a duly advertised public hearing held on June 19, 2000, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. CUP-2000-17 which is maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL'TED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on June 19, 2000, support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the proposed use will be completely contained within existing structures on the property. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the proposed use is similar in intensity to the previous community center use of the property. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the proposed school will be similar to the previous community center use of the property and will occupy existing structures. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the facility will increase the educational opportunities available to the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Plumbing, Electrical, Mechanical, and Energy Codes and the California Title 24 Handicapped regulations. 2. The lease must be finalized between the City and the applicant prior to use of the property by the school. 3. The Fire Department shall have complete access at all times for emergency responses. 4. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 5. Use of the property as authorized by this Conditional Use Permit shall be limited to an adult school with hours of operation between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m. 6. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 7. Existing signage on the property identifying the previous use of the property shall be removed. 8. Fencing shall be installed on the property for security purposes. 9. Signage shall be installed indicating that loitering and skateboarding are not permitted on school grounds BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of July 17, 2000, by the following vote: AYES: PARRA, MARTINELLI, BACA, DETZER NAYS: ABSENT: UNGAB, VALDERRAMA, .GODSEALK ABSTAIN: KIMBALL PARK IC —OS 552 /5/6 /522 f !p b gN a y a MI �; %6/1 a /d2 I 2 3 14 5 00 ma .1704 31 a 552 OWN 15th ~...10 r. /5/2 /3/9 ti RS:3-PD 1523 /327 : /332 /54C w /70/ .AAr W /70. ` 1C-OS PROPOSED SCHOOL SITE mi.,IZONE BOUNDARY 14th ST f 1509 /5/5 /535 w y II! e SCALE: 1" = 200' 7 NORTH LOCATION MAP 300 E. 15th Street CUP-2000-17 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 6/5/2000 INITIAL HEARING: 6/19/2000 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 19 ITEM TITLE MTDB (METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT BOARD) TRANSIT FINANCING AND PROPOSED FUNDING CONSOLIDATION PREPARED Y Alfredo Rios, Jr. 62.DEPARTMENT National City Transit EXPLANATION. Based upon Senate Bill (SB) 664 (Alpert)that was signed int law in 1999which limited any one jurisdiction's contribution to the Regional Service Fund to 50 percent of its apportionment of TDA funds, and also changed the MTDB Boards ability to modify the Regional Transit Services Formula to a majority vote, the MTD Board of Directors approved principle, a change in transit finance process whereby all financial resources would be consolidated into one "pot" under MTDB. A final vote on the matter is scheduled for the August 10, 2000 meeting. Beginning in FY02 the TDA monies would flow directly to MTDB unless our jurisdiction "opts out" of the process for FY02, which we do not recommend at this time. The MTD Board acted on an initial set of recommendations and approved the following for FY01: A) Funding for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Complementary Paratransit Services and MTS bus replacement was taken "off the top" of the TDA apportionment schedule. B) The regional transit services formula was modified to work toward and equitable formula goal. Included in the package are the following: A) Seven key policy issues. B) Impact of local Jurisdiction"opting" of the consolidated process. C) Advantages and Disadvantages. 1)) Current TDA claim process and proposed TDA claim process. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Agreement will not involve City of National City Funds. Account No. STAFF RECO ENDATION Staff Recommends Approval. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TT CH ENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. MTDB Funding Consolidated Proposal A-200 (Rev. 9/80) MTDB Metropolitan Transit Development Board 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92101-7490 (619) 231-1466 FAX (619) 234-3407 June 23, 2000 Mr. Tom McCabe City Manager City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Dear Tom: ADM 121 (PC 30100) Subject: METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT FINANCE At its June 22, 2000, meeting, the MTD Board of Directors approved (11-3) the recommendations related to transit finance as contained in the attached agenda report (No. 33) from that meeting. Essentially, the action approved "in principle" a change in the transit finance process whereby all financial resources would be consolidated into one "pot" under MTDB. The primary impact to your jurisdiction is related to how the state Transportation Development Act (TDA) monies would be handled. As proposed, beginning in FY 02, the TDA monies would flow directly to MTDB unless your jurisdiction "opts out" of this new process for FY 02. You should also be aware that our intent would be to pursue legislation, with Board concurrence, to incorporate this new process into the Transportation Development Act for FY 03 and beyond. The attached MTDB agenda report provides details on the proposed new process plus provides MTD Board policy direction on seven major issues associated with the proposal. I, or my staff, have already discussed much of this with you and/or your staff and council. The Board has directed that a final vote on the matter be scheduled for its August 10, 2000, meeting. Therefore, related to this action date, please call me if you have any questions (619.557.4511) or want to meet on the subject. I have also enclosed two other pieces: (1) a two -page outline summary of the problems, background, proposal, and critical features; and (2) a printout of a PowerPoint presentation primarily related to the seven policy issues. Sincerely, omas F. Larwin General Manager PSmith L-CITYMGRS.TLARWIN Enclosures: Al #33, "MTDB Area Transit Finance," June 22, 2000 Metropolitan Area Transit Finance, Proposed Funding Consolidation PowerPoint Presentation (printout) CD C c- W CD z> Member Agencies: City of Chula Vista, City of Coronado, City of El Cajon, City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa, City of Lemon Grove, City of National City, City of Poway, City of San Diego, City of Santee, County of San Diego, State of California Metropolitan Transit Development Board is Coordinator of the Metropolitan Transit System and the j64 Taxicab Administration Subsidiary Corporations: 1Q)San Diego Transit Corporation, rikf San Diego Trolley, Inc., and ®San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Company For personal trip planning or route information, call 1-800-COMMUTE or visit our web site at sdcommute. com! MTDB Metropolitan Transit Development Board 1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000 San Diego, CA 92101-7490 (619) 231-1466 FAX (619) 234-3407 Subject: Agenda Board of Directors Meeting June 22, 2000 MTDB AREA TRANSIT FINANCE INTRODUCTION: Item No. 33 FIN 310 (PC 30100) In April 1999 the MTD Board of Directors authorized further development work toward implementation of a Metropolitan Area Transit Financing concept that would, as an objective, cure the inequities associated with the regional services funding and make the overall financing of services more efficient and easier to comprehend. As part of that direction, a Board -member Transit Financing Subcommittee was formed, chaired by Board member Rindone. The Subcommittee has been meeting on a near - monthly basis since last April 1999—a total of 13 meetings. In addition, the direction from the April 1999 Joint Boards Budget Workshop also included the formation of an MTDB area Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) Operator Advisory Committee (OAC). This Committee, comprising the top managers of each of the MTS operators, has likewise been meeting on a monthly basis since the spring of 1999. Subsequent to the April 1999 Workshop, the Subcommittee's attention was diverted based upon Senate Bill (SB) 664 (Alpert) that was signed into law in the fall of 1999. This legislation had a significant impact on the Transportation Development Act (TDA) process as it applies to the MTDB area. It limited any one jurisdiction's contribution to the Regional Services Fund to 50 percent of its apportionment of TDA funds. SB 664 also changed the Board's ability to modify the Regional Transit Services formula to a majority vote. Finally, the legislation requires a five-year needs and revenues assessment to be adopted by the Board in 2000 that would significantly deal with the inequities in the TDA funding process. For your background, the current TDA claim process is shown on Attachment A. There are seven claims that are produced and need to be acted on by the Board as part of this current process, and compared to two for the North County Transit District (NCTD) jurisdiction. FY 01 On February 24, 2000, your Board acted on an initial set of recommendations and approved the following for FY 01: Member Agencies: City of Chula Vista. City of Coronado. City of El Cajon, City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa. City of Lemon Grove, City of National City, City of Poway. City of San Diego. City of Santee, County of San Diego, State of California Metropolitan Transit Development Board is Coordinator of the Metropolitan Transit System and is Regulatory Authority for fl Paratransit Administration Subsidiary Corporations: [ J San Diego Transit Corporation, (�1 San Diego Trolley, Inc. and { I) San Diego 8 Arizona Eastern Railway Company • Funding for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) complementary paratransit services and MTS bus replacement was taken "off the top" of the TDA apportionment schedule; and • The Regional Transit Services formula was modified to work toward an equitable formula goal. In addition, your Board directed that work continue on so-called "Option B." This option was related to the April 1999 proposal to consolidate all MTDB area transit resources (i.e., federal, state, local) for purposes of optimum and efficient use under MTDB. FY 02 The focus of today's action is for FY 02 and beyond. However, to be prepared for FY 02, certain process -related steps would need to begin early in FY 01 (i.e., summer of 2000). The recommendations below have been endorsed by your Transit Financing Subcommittee (June 8, 2000; vote: 4-0) and Executive Committee (June 15, 2000; vote: 5-0). RECOMMENDATION: That the MTD Board of Directors: 1. Approve, in principle, the consolidated transit funding process as described in Attachment B and consistent with the Policy Issues outlined in Attachment C for FY 02 and beyond. 2. Direct the General Manager to return at the August 10, 2000, meeting with a final recommendation regarding the transit funding process. 3. Direct the General Manager to begin the proposed Short -Range Transit Plan (SRTP) and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) process in July 2000, consistent with Section D of the Policy Issues (Attachment C), to include representation from the local jurisdictions and the MTS operators. 4. Approve an alternative process for those local jurisdictions that "opt out" from participation in the consolidated funding process that would: ➢ maintain consistency with all jurisdictions for purposes of funding ADA complementary services and bus replacement needs. ➢ make necessary adjustments to the "Regional Transit Services formula" that would be consistent with the "goals" (shown in Attachment D) for each such jurisdiction and local operating funding needs. ➢ include such jurisdictions in the new SRTP and CIP process to the extent that they want to be involved, but limited to the amount of transit funding available to them from their local TDA. DISCUSSION: 5. direct the General Manager to notify Senator Dede Alpert of today's actions on this subject, and respectfully request no further legislative action this year, with the parallel request to participate with Senator Alpert in the development of the framework for such a bill next year. Budget Impact None directly; however, the proposed consolidated transit funding process would achieve cost -efficiencies for MTDB, the MTS operators, and the local jurisdictions. Description of Proposed Consolidated Transit Funding Process The basis for the proposed consolidated transit funding process would be to focus on service rather than resources. Thus, the proposed method is not formula based, rather, the total funds available for transit operations and capital in the MTDB area would be pooled and a series of cost -based take -downs would be applied in priority fashion. The proposed process is schematically shown on Attachment B and is similar to the concept reviewed with the Board in April 1999. The concept would be akin to how the North County Transit District (NCTD) process works with some restrictions to balance regional and local needs and programs. More specifically, the metropolitan local jurisdictions would be directly involved in the process of determining future transit services and projects. The process would begin with the consolidation, or pooling, of all discretionary transit monies available to MTDB and the MTS operators. As recommended, the costs then would be prioritized "off the top" as follows: • • • ADA services Local match requirements for federal transit capital grants (i.e., federal Section 5307 and 5309 grants) Local and regional service base Thus, there are three major distinctions between this proposal and the present process: 1. There would be no artificial restrictions on the use of MTDB area resources —they would all be pooled and used to the maximum advantage for the area as a whole. 2. There would be no regional services (percentage) formula —therefore, no policy hassles regarding its components and balances, and no year-to-year changes based upon updated survey data. 3. There would be no need for a separate bus replacement fund —instead all MTS capital needs, bus and rail, would be incorporated within the multi -year MTDB -3- capital program and funded on an ongoing annual basis as part of the capital programming process. The quantitative expression of this proposed process is described in the tables contained in Attachment B. Here are the assumptions that are part of this proposal: • All MTDB area TDA Article 4.0 and 4.5 funds would be consolidated. • Other MTDB-area discretionary transit financial resources would be added to the "pool" to include: State Transit Assistance (STA), TransNet, MTDB miscellaneous, transit advertising revenue, and federal Section 5307 Preventive Maintenance. The amount of preventive maintenance is assumed to equal that which is assumed in the Short -Range Transit Plan (SRTP) for MTDB operations. • All operating costs have been escalated from the base of the FY 01 TDA claims. Costs for FY 02 and beyond have been escalated 3 percent thereafter. ADA costs have been escalated at a constant 6 percent per year. We assumed that the County Transit System (CTS) express service would be part of regional services. It is anticipated that these estimates would be revised as the SRTP process proceeds and new contract costs are known to the operators. • All capital needs would strive to optimize use of federal funds, at the maximum share of 80 percent. The bus replacement plan, along with other MTS capital needs, is assumed to come from these federal capital sources with the required match funded through this option. KEY POLICY CHOICES The Subcommittee has spent a significant amount of time dealing with the specifics of how the proposed process would work. The result is a set of seven policy issues, described in detail in Attachment C, that have evolved over the past year: • ADA Complementary Paratransit Service cost restraints • Balancing of local and regional services • Fare structure adjustments • SRTP and CIP development process • Unified, single TDA claims process • Use of existing bus and light rail transit (LRT) capital replacement reserves • Use of federal capital funds (preventive maintenance) for operations -4- These policy issues cover the significant questions that have arisen regarding how the proposed new process would work. However, there are some others (e.g., administrative costs) that still need some attention. Therefore, the Subcommittee recommended that today's vote be approved in principle" with a final action scheduled for the August 10, 2000, meeting. Thus, this scheduling would allow additional time for local jurisdictional review and input. LEGISLATION One of the outcomes of the Subcommittee process is to request Senator Alpert to delay any legislative change to a year from now rather than during this year 2000 legislative session. This delay of one year would have several implications: • It would allow us a year to gain additional comfort with the new p. ocess (if approved). • It would allow the Board to come up with its own legislative proposal for the year 2001 legislative session that, hopefully, would be accepted by Senator Alpert as an acceptable solution. • It would allow a local jurisdiction to "opt out" for FY 02 as described earlier. IMPACTS OF A LOCAL JURISDICTION "OPTING" OUT OF THE CONSOLIDATED PROCESS The table in Attachment E entitled "MTDB Area FY 2002 Transportation Development Act (TDA) Estimated TDA Article 4.0 Apportionments" was developed to aid each local jurisdiction's assessment of the impact of "opting our of the regional finance plan for FY 02. The first section of the table reflects the actual FY 01 funds made available to the jurisdictions after deduction of ADA services, the bus replacement plan, and Regional Services contributions. The second section estimates the amount of funds that would be available to the jurisdictions for local service after the off -the -top contributions are deducted in FY 02, using the goal formula for contributions toward Regional Services. The final section of the table reflects a minor change to the goal regional formula to assure that local funds are not reduced so much as to not have sufficient funds to operate existing local service for the year. Several cities will not have sufficient funds in FY 02 to afford local service and meeting their regional "goal" (namely, Chula Vista, Lemon Grove, and National City). Following this table are two additional tables that reflect updated estimates of costs associated with ADA paratransit service and a revised bus replacement plan. The ADA service costs rise in FY 02 (over FY 01) due to the carryover available in FY 01. The five-year projection is shown in Attachment B. The third table shows the total resources needed for bus replacement in FY 02. Changes for FY 02 are explained on the table and reflect specific operator needs. -5- CONCLUSIONS With regard to FY 02 and beyond, we find the advantages and disadvantages of the consolidation to be: Advantages • Funding formulas (with percentages) would be eliminated. The current fund process uses a percentage -based formula that is based upon outdated data and results in inequities among the jurisdictions in MTDB's area. • "Regional" services that cross local jurisdictional boundaries would be fully funded. The current formula does not produce sufficient revenue for funding these services. • All transit resources would be consolidated. The metropolitan area would be able to build on a stronger financial base by pooling monetary resources, formerly segregated by jurisdiction, into one unified fund devoted to transit purposes. • A single claim would be filed. Paperwork for each jurisdiction would be drastically cut with a single, unified claim for TDA funds by MTDB. This process would be identical to what has existed in the North San Diego County area since 1976. • ADA complementary services would be funded "off the top." The present formula for allocating expenses for federally mandated ADA paratransit services would be dispensed with, further reducing local staff time and paperwork. • Buses and facilities would be funded to ensure quality equipment and a timely replacement schedule. Bus and facility purchases would be leveraged with federal and other matching sources, providing more operating money in the region for service. • Capital projects would have priority if they yield operating savings and involve replacement and rehabilitation. After funding ADA services, the proposed method would ensure that the federal capital formula monies available to MTDB would be matched with local funds. • Base local service levels would be protected. Local services would continue to operate at their present levels, which would be "guaranteed" as a base for the next year. If total TDA funding to the area was to be severely reduced, necessitating cutbacks in service, then there would be a systemwide process of examination of local service levels, protecting a "lifeline" system of services. • Local capital projects would be able to leverage federal sources. Use of federal funding would enlarge the pool of resources that would be available to local communities, allowing greater levels of capital needs to be satisfied. -6- • Financial risks to the local jurisdictions would be diminished. With a consolidated funding process, a jurisdiction would no longer be dependent solely on its allocation of TDA funds in the event that costs increase for its present service. • "Rich" and "poor" communities would be balanced. Funds would be earmarked for existing base levels of local service, and communities in jeopardy of not having sufficient revenues would be insulated from potential cutbacks caused by a flawed formula. • A unified and more organized SRTP and CIP process would result. All new service and capital improvement project proposals would be funded on the merit of the proposal, based on a set of equitable criteria. Thus, all jurisdictions would be treated uniformly. • MTDB and the local jurisdictions would reach consensus without the need for legislation forcing an action. As proposed, legislation would be developed by MTDB with the jurisdictions, after working through the process administratively inFY01. • Existing jurisdiction capital reserves and unallocated balances would not be lost by jurisdictions. These funds could be placed into a variety of projects (planning, capital, or operating) or placed in a discretionary fund for future opportunities. Disadvantages • Local reserve funds would not be enlarged. Individual jurisdictions would no longer be able to build up unallocated reserves to save funds. • Control over local TDA funds would be reduced. For the local TDA funds available to a jurisdiction, the particular local jurisdiction would have less control over funding projects and services that they favor. • Influence over local service and capital project proposals would be reduced. With the unified SRTP and CIP process, local jurisdictions would be more directly subject to evaluation criteria that would be applied areawide. -7- • For capital projects, federal regulations would have to be followed. The use of federal funds for local capital projects would add new procurement, project monitoring, and reporting requirements; however, this would be managed by MTDB with little direct impact on a jurisdiction. Thomas F. Larwin General Manager DGunn 33-00JUN22.TLARW I 6/15/00 Attachments: A. Current TDA Claim Process B. Consolidated Transit Funding Process C. Policy Issues D. Regional Transit Services Formula Goals E. FY 2002 Estimated TDA Apportionments Board Only CURRENT TDA CLAIM PROCESS 101A1. FUNDS AVAIIABtf SANDAG Planning 8 BrzyI Ilogmam MU, KID, A, KID, amd USA v1 Suddal AaIahk for CislriWion NCID I CakS. Camp Pmddm, lkiKnpaaledraMaet 6 Room) MTDBNm 9Cities Cdies 6 County Appomhmmenfs by Papulalim HIM Claim (MICB,SOX, SDII) IMO Beganal Smite Fmd County FIm Board Nea Our) City °ICIdaNst 1.1 Fla6malt yTonsil I I laMesafNl Clam Clam Cl m Inpaul Beach City Coud Amore Coronado CM Coud Appeal I � I CAI of Sr Ciego EsisGng MOU 1 88888 1 ■ ■ ■'-------I 11__ CfdaVisla Natoli City II taMesa BoadofSymmsas lenancswe CilyCouxif uoal C1yCoucIAgewalj City CoadAppall Alpowl CmyCoudAfpwal AMOS Ref. Serg,t ces ()men! I I)A 03/11/lNI WOO Net Clams MID Board Appma N471, *ir. 4. v S4a)A BUAND APPROVAL CIS Gam II Cajon (II CoudAppwal Pony '.rare City Coud Appwal I I I Ay I l d nllriirai M'7D8 Art. 4. S AJC7!, 4W . $ S, ,Par) 1 A( id tien I,rqu In Nrvmgntl H OII O PROPOSED TDA .,LAIM PROCESS TOTAL TDA FUNDS AVAILABLE SANDAG Planning & Bicycle Program I Article 4.5 I Subtotal Available for Distribution NCTD Claim i i MTDB Area Article 4.0 ADA Services Capital Fund ■ I IMTDB Claim MTD Board Approves I SANDAG Board I Approval County Non -Board Claire OTC NIA `00/33/9 `££ Pn TDA 05/19/00 Att. C, Al No. 33, 6/22/00, FIN 310 CONSOLIDATED TRANSIT FUNDING POLICY ISSUES DRAFT A. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) COMPLEMENTARY PARATRANSIT SERVICE COST RESTRAINTS The Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) (central zone) and County Transit System (suburban zones) have competitively bid the ADA paratransit service to maintain cost control. The operating costs that go into effect on July 1, 2000, are part of a new service contract with a five-year term and allow for very small increases in unit cost rates. Overall, operating costs may vary as a function of fuel costs and passenger demand for the service. Proposed Policies 1. Competitive Contracting: continue the process of competitive bidding of services to keep unit costs from escalating. 2. Mandated ADA Service: maintain the existing policy of providing the service, as legally required by ADA. 3. ADA Operations and Fare Coordination: evaluate in FY 01 ADA operations among the four ADA zones to improve transfer capability and reliability. Evaluate the management and contractual arrangement of ADA services in FY 03-04. Address, as part of a fare structure evaluation, the concept of a seamless ADA fare structure within the entire county. B. BALANCING OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL SERVICES The effectiveness of our overall Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) network of services is and will be dependent upon a system of interconnected routes and services. Some routes serve short trips while others serve longer ones, and then there are some that serve a variety of trips. The local and regional routes generally can be distinguished from one another as follows: Local Regional Trip Length Shorter Longer Trip Purpose Nonwork Work Function Feeder, distributor Line Haul; Express Productivity Lower Higher Speed Slower Faster Stop Spacing Every few blocks Longer; up to every mile In addition, another characteristic has arisen due to the nature of how the Transportation Development Act (TDA) funding process works in the metropolitan area, and that relates to the additional characteristic of regional service crossing jurisdictional boundaries. C-1 Some balance needs to be retained with regard to investment actions between local and regional services. Similarly, the same is true if_ a systemwide cutback is required. Separate from this is the need for MTDB to maintain a sound process for evaluating existing services and new service proposals to continuously improve system performance and grow ridership. Thus, Policy No. 43, "New and Existing Service Evaluation," (adopted in January 2000) forms the basis for this balancing (attached for reference). Proposed Policies 1. Local Service "Guarantee." A general policy guideline will be used to ensure that each jurisdiction's local service level will be maintained as a base from one year to the next. However, the procedures in 2. and 6., below, will be used to evaluate the existing services for continuous improvement. Local service is defined as any public transit service that does not meet the definition of regional service or ADA paratransit services. The current definition of regional service is: Those routes which • cross jurisdictional boundaries [with stops in each jurisdiction]; • provide the trunk line [classified in the SRTP as urban, all -day express, or trolley routes] for local/feeder services; and • serve high -volume inter -community travel corridors [more than 50 percent on freeways, prime arterials and major arterials]. In addition, regional service must meet two of the following three criteria: • provide major connections to the regional route network [serve four or more stops, each with more than 500 daily ons/offs and served by three or more routes]; • serve trips with a long average trip length [greater than the systemwide average]; and • carry significant levels of annual ridership [higher than the system -wide average]. The primary basis for this analysis of "local" services will be the number of scheduled fixed -route revenue service miles provided and scheduled service hours for non-ADA paratransit, within the local jurisdiction. The relative proportion of regional and local services will be tracked on an annual basis and reported to the Board during the annual budget development process. In addition, included in the definition of local service would be any facilities maintenance activities performed with local TDA funds. In this case, the "guarantee" would be based upon the prior year level with indexing for inflation. -2- C-2 2. Existing Services: Continuous Evaluation. Maintain an ongoing process of evaluating existing services and new service proposals as described in MTDB Policy No. 43, "New and Existing Service Evaluation." • In FY 01, MTDB will evaluate the feasibility of adding a new category of service in Policy No. 43 to address local circulator services and combining commuter and peak -period express. • In FY 01, MTDB will amend Policy No. 43 to incorporate definitions for each service category. 3. New Service Proposals: Evaluation During Plan Development. The Policy No. 43 process will be used to provide an objective basis for determining priorities among new service proposals. All new service proposals will be evaluated during the Short -Range Transit Plan (SRTP) development and factor in measures of population, employment, and a.,tivity growth. In addition, in FY 01, MTDB will evaluate an amendment to Policy No. 43 that would incorporate a linkage with the Policy No. 40 transit -land use coordination. 4. High Priority to Major Coaster, Light Rail Transit (LRT), and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Projects. For major capital investment projects, a minimum, practical level of service should be defined by Board action during the environmental process and serve as a funding priority. In addition, the Board's action should include a funding plan for an associated local feeder network. 5. New Service Investments: Process. The Policy No. 43 process contains a method for establishing priorities for new service proposals (Section 43.7) and would be used to guide the Board's actions. As provided for in the Policy No. 43 process, all year one" service proposals would be prioritized and arranged for Board evaluation during the annual budget development process. 6. Systemwide Cutback: Process. In the event of a funding shortfall requiring a systemwide cutback, the following policy guide will be used: • First, based upon Policy No. 43 procedures, the weak -performing components of all routes (e.g., late hours, weekend hours) will be evaluated for elimination, with the objective of preserving the route. • Second, if the above cuts are insufficient to achieve the necessary savings, then other nonpeak services will be examined for reduction (using the same procedures) with the objective of preserving the peak period (i.e., three morning and three evening hours) service level, and the basic route structure. • Third, if further savings are required, then nonproductive geographic segments of the routes will be examined using the Policy No. 43 process to rank segments and would be used to guide the Board's actions. Included in this evaluation would be the regional need to preserve a "lifeline" system of services. -3- C-3 7. Development of Lifeline System: MTDB will develop a lifeline system(s) in FY 01-02. Lifeline services are defined as route segments beyond the 1/2-mile distance of other transit service and having lower than twice the average subsidy per passenger (based on all weekday fixed -route services). All new services will be evaluated as to whether they qualify as a lifeline service. C. FARE STRUCTURE ADJUSTMENTS MTDB will be addressing some short-term fine-tuning of fare policies related to family weekends, universal transfers, and college passes for implementation in FY 01. Additional work will begin for analysis of the fare pricing for possible implementation in FY 02. Average fares have not kept pace with increases in operating costs. The analysis will cover possible changes in discount pricing, a look at the fare revenue stream expected over the next few years, ADA fares, and coordination efforts with North County Transit District (NCTD) and the combined Board's Joint Committee on Regional Transit (JCRT) efforts toward an increasingly seamless fare system countywide. Proposed Policies 1. Short -Term Fare Policy Adjustments. Review existing fare policies for possible implementation in FY 01. 2. Long -Term Fare Policy Adjustments. Conduct a comprehensive fare policy review in FY 01 for possible implementation in FY 02-03 including the following: • fare pricing for all fare categories; • ADA fares; • NCTD fare coordination with MTS services; and • seamless countywide fare structure. D. SHORT-RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM: DEVELOPMENT PROCESS MTDB develops an annual SRTP that lays out transit service proposals for a rolling five-year period. The plan serves four primary purposes: • It forms the basis of services changes and policy actions. • It is designed to meet state grant application requirements. • It is a working tool for MTDB, transit operators, local planning agencies, and other interested parties. • It is the driving force behind two closely related and important elements — the TDA claims approval process and the MTDB budget development process. For the SRTP to effectively drive the annual TDA claims and MTDB budget processes, the development of all three of these elements (SRTP, TDA, and MTDB budget) must be well meshed. The initial checkpoint in the TDA review process is that proposals be consistent with the SRTP — that C-4 any new or improved services being claimed must be for service proposals included in year one or year two of the SRTP Service Adjustment Plan. Currently, operators prepare the TDA claims in March, which are reviewed by MTDB and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in April and May. In April, operators are requested to submit their transit service and capital proposals for inclusion in the SRTP, with MTDB evaluating these proposals in May. These concurrent events place undue time burdens on the operators and MTDB, with SRTP submittals and reviews often being delayed. With April and May being months that MTDB reviews TDA claims and sorts out issues, a more realistic schedule would be for the SRTP submittals to be reviewed in July and August, policy options going to the MTD Board in September -October, a draft SRTP issued in October, with adoption in December. The year one and year two service proposals would then be the basis for the TDA claims submitted the following April. Services. The transit service proposals submitted by each jurisdiction through the transit operating agencies that serve it are evaluated according to Policy No. 43 to determine which ran:. high in cost- effectiveness and productivity. Each service proposal will be placed in one of six categories based upon its geographic location and functions: • Suburban Feeder • Line -Haul • Peak Express • Urban Feeder • Crosstown • All -Day Express As noted in Policy issue A., there will also be an effort in FY 01 to evaluate the possibility of a new category being added that would be related to local circulation service. New service proposals are evaluated based on three factors: 1. passengers per revenue hour; 2. passengers per revenue mile; and 3. subsidy per passenger. Policy No. 43 includes a quantitative procedure for ranking the service proposals (using the above -noted factors), with the highest ranking proposal being implemented first, followed by the next highest and so on until available funding is exhausted. In cases where a choice must be made between proposals of equal rank, other policy goals would be considered in selecting a proposal for implementation. MTDB's Director of Planning and Operations then meets with the city manager and transit coordinator of each jurisdiction to review the service proposals and resultant rankings. From these meetings, a list of service improvements is agreed upon for inclusion in the SRTP. This process would remain largely the way it is currently structured today. The major difference would be that local jurisdictions would have their proposals more directly competing with proposals from other jurisdictions. Moreover, if money is scarce in the region for transit improvements, no improvements may be recommended for implementation. Projects. Included in the SRTP are capital projects proposed for implementation, which are derived from the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The CIP process examines many potential projects and -5- C-5 recommends those with the greatest merit for inclusion in the SRTP. This process also designates those projects to be implemented in year one of the plan. Currently, MTDB's capital improvements are chosen for implementation in year one through a technical process of nominating, ranking, and selecting CIP projects. The selected, highly ranked projects are next incorporated into MTDB's budget for approval by the MTD Board each spring. To be considered, each project must be described in terms of scope, schedule, cost, and justifications. This process begins when the operating agencies and MTDB submit project proposals. All MTS operators would be included in this process. The Capital Project Coordinators for each operating agency and MTDB meet as a committee to rank these nominated projects. A numerical ranking is assigned to each project based on five criteria. The MTDB General Manager, in consultation with the other operating agency General Managers, develops a program of projects to recommend for funding in priority order. There will be numerous projects not able to be ranked high enough to be funded, and they are then reconsider„ d in the following fiscal years. In addition to a one-year funding element, the process concludes with a five-year program of funded and nonfunded projects. For programming guidance, five criteria have been established to evaluate the benefit -cost of each candidate project. In general, a high priority will be assigned to a project that is found to save operating costs. 1. SRTP/CIP Threshold Determinations Proposed service changes and capital projects would be handled in one of two ways. Depending on the size (based on cost) of proposed service changes and capital projects, they would either be considered through the SRTP/CIP process thereby undergoing rigorous review and evaluation, or under certain threshold amounts, the proposed service changes or projects could be exempt from detailed review. • Minor Operational Adjustments - It is recognized that there is occasional need to implement minor adjustments to transit services, which could not have been anticipated in the SRTP process. Currently, the MTDB budget provides San Diego Transit Corporation (SDTC) with the ability to implement such adjustments having a total annual net subsidy not to exceed $50,000. The threshold for adjustments for San Diego Trolley, Inc. (SDTI), and MTDB Contract Services is $25,000 each in total annual net subsidy. We propose that suburban fixed -route operators also be provided latitude to make adjustments which do not exceed a cumulative annual net subsidy of $25,000 per each operator. Changes that exceed that amount would be part of the SRTP process. • Capital Proiects — Similarly, all three MTDB operators retain miscellaneous capital budget line items, which allow them to make unanticipated small capital purchases. We propose that each suburban operator,'that has reserves specifically available, also be allowed to move forward on small capital projects costing $50,000 or less without being required to undergo the CIP process or "federalization" (i.e., where the region can benefit by maximizing leverage of local dollars). For projects larger than $50,000, the intent would be to leverage federal monies for the region. However, the decision to use federal monies would depend upon the schedule implications on a specific project. -6- C-6 2. SRTP Process an,. A. Basis: Policy No. 43 will be used to guide the proposals to be included in the SRTP, as described in Section B ("Balancing of Local and Regional Services"). B. Schedule: • July -August — MTDB meets with local jurisdictions and operators to receive proposed service changes/additions for the following six years excluding the upcoming year. • September -October — STRP development and policy options discussed at Board level. • November -December — Board adoption of SRTP. • January -May (following year) — STRP year one proposals reviewed during annual TDA claim and budget development processes. 3. CIP Process A. Basis: The following five criteria will be used to develop a quantitative guide to evaluate each proposed project's relative merit: 1. safety enhancement; 2. replacement value; 3. operating cost benefit; 4. travel time savings; and 5. customer benefit. B. Schedule: • July -August — MTDB meets with local jurisdictions and operators to receive proposed capital project submittals. September -October — MTDB General Manager meets with operator general managers to develop recommended program of projects (one year and five year). • November -December — Board of Directors adoption of CIP and federal capital grants request for next fiscal year. E. UNIFIED SINGLE TDA CLAIMS PROCESS A single claim would be prepared by MTDB encompassing the needs of all MTS operators. Any potential issues relating to service expansion/reduction and capital improvements would be addressed during the SRTP and CIP preparation, and subsequent Board action to approve. Subject to any -7- C-7 necessary legislative changes and to meet the detailed requirements of the TDA, the basic steps in the new process would include: 1. MTS Operator Submittal of Year One Projections. Operator preparation and submittal to MTDB of prior -year actual, current, and coming -year projected service and revenue information and capital requirements for all routes (in conformance with approved SRTP and CIP) would be required similar to the existing TDA claim process. This would include operator preparation and submittal of budgets for these services, explaining large budget variances from prior years. In addition, all relevant TDA certifications would be required of the operators. The year one submittals will be presented to MTDB by all operators as part of the MTDB budget . development process. This process begins in December with Board approval of assumptions. Key dates would be: January — Preliminary five-year financial projections from operators. February — Preliminary next -year budget details from operators. March — Final next -year budget details from operators and any changes to the five-year projections. April — MTDB Finance Workshop and action on five-year financial plan. 2. SRTP and CIP Conformance. The MTDB review process would be similar to today's to insure that the service, project, and revenue information is in conformance with the SRTP and CIP. This review would also check budget information for reasonableness and availability of funding. 3. April 1 Submittal of Single Claim. MTDB would submit to SANDAG the preliminary claim due April 1 of each year. It will contain the information for all MTS services. 4. June Approvals. Any advisory committee reviews would be finalized between April 1 and June 1, with action scheduled by the MTD and SANDAG Boards in late June. Implementation of Unified TDA Claims Process Legislation. Public Utilities Code Section 120265, amended in 1999 by Chapter 729 (SB 664, Alpert), provides that the Board may annually adopt and amend an assessment formula for funding regional services. The section requires consideration of transit needs and revenues for the next five-year period, including: • ADA services; funds required to maintain, rehabilitate, and replace capital facilities and equipment including rolling stock and transit centers; • identification of matching funds to avoid loss of state and federal funds; • development of an appropriate balance between local and regional services; • development of efficient and effective use of all local, regional, state, and federal funds; -8- C-8 • recognition of the needs for operation of local services and anticipated changes in revenue sources; and recognition of the population of each jurisdiction. The section also requires that the formula may not provide for a regional assessment for any city greater than 50 percent of the city's annual apportionment. The proposed unified TDA claims process addresses each of those required statutory issues. However, under current law the cities are permitted to file individual claims for TDA funds for local services. By approval of the unified TDA claims process, the city would be agreeing that separate claims would not be required. Rather, the cities would be involved at the front end of the process in the development of the Short -Range Transit Plan and Capital Improvement Program through recommendations from the city council to MTDB for local operating and capital needs. We would recommend that a change in state law be sought to specifically eliminate the process for cities filing individual TDA claims after the unified TDA claims process is approved by MTDB. In the event the city wished to continue to file its own claim, the Board should, as part of the adoption of the unified TDA claims process, identify a formula percentage for assessment for regional services for that city consistent with previously adopted interim and target regional formula. Further, the Board may wish to consider what, if any, provisions of the unified process would not be applicable to such cities, such as the provision of federal funding for replacement of capital facilities and equipment. F. USE OF EXISTING BUS AND LRT CAPITAL REPLACEMENT RESERVES In accordance with Board policy, annual deposits into bus and light rail transit (LRT) capital replacement reserves are required. These reserves are used for matching the federal formula funds. As part of the process of balancing the operating budgets, the Board made a policy decision to defer deposits during 1993-1997. A partial deposit of $2 million was made in 1998, a full deposit of $5.5 million in 1999, and a partial deposit of $2.6 million was made in 2000. The current uncommitted balances are $2.4 million in the bus reserve and $9.3 million in the LRT reserve. Proposed Policies 1. Expenditure Plan for Reserves: Work with the SDTI and SDTC Boards of Directors and MTDB Contract Services to develop an expenditure plan which would identify future bus and LRT needs not provided for under the formula program (i.e., discretionary funding). 2. Operator and Local Discretionary Project Reserve: Some portion of existing capital reserves for SDTC, SDTI, and MTDB Contract Services would be retained to use as funds to match state and federal discretionary grants. At the discretion of the jurisdictions, an additional reserve fund would be set up utilizing the local jurisdictions' reserves for which they have chosen not to program in the SRTP. Each jurisdiction's reserve would be separately tracked and would accrue interest. Any use of a jurisdiction's reserve amount would require the prior approval of that jurisdiction's governing board and the MTD Board. G. USE OF FEDERAL CAPITAL FUNDS (PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE) FOR OPERATIONS MTDB receives federal formula funds ($28 million for FY 00) which are primarily used for the bus and LRT capital replacement program. When the federal operating assistance program was eliminated a few years ago, additional flexibility was provided to allow the use of the federal formula funds for -9- C-9 preventive maintenance. Essentially, this allows the use of capital funds for operating purposes. SDTC and SDTI could conceivably use up to $20 million annually in federal funds for preventive maintenance. We have programmed the use of $4.4 million in federal funds for preventive maintenance purposes in FY 00. The critical policy tradeoff here is that with every dollar used for preventive maintenance it means one less for capital improvements and replacement. Proposed Policy 1. Establish Baseline Assumption for Preventive Maintenance. Start each budget development process with the assumption to use not more than 15 percent of total formula funds for preventive maintenance (current use level). 2. Any Use Beyond the Baseline Assumption. Any use above 15 percent would be at the discretion of the Board and should be considered in light of capital tradeoff. TF3 use of additional preventive maintenance to balance the operating budget would be clearly displayed to the Board as a policy choice during the annual budget development process and consider the competing needs for operating versus capital resources. DGunn/TFL-REPORTS TDA OPTION POLICIES 6/15/00 Attachment: Policy No. 43 -10- C-10 MTDB Metropolitan Transit Development Board Policies and Procedures No. 43 SUBJECT: Board Approval: 1 /13/00 NEW AND EXISTING SERVICE EVALUATION PURPOSE: To establish: 1. A process for evaluating existing transit service, as well as identifying service changes to improve performance. 2. A process for evaluating and assigning implementation priority among proposed new and expanded transit services. BACKGROUND: This policy provides an objective set of procedures that can be utilized to evaluate service changes. It allows such changes to be considered on the basis of efficiency and effectiveness without regard to which geographic area is being served. An annual process is described for evaluating existing service and potential service changes for inclusion in the annual Short -Range Transit Plan (SRTP). The review will also provide input into the five-year budget process. This process would be used to identify services or areas that could benefit from service restructuring, route segment analysis, marketing, or enhanced frequencies. Routes would be designated into several separate categories, based on service area characteristics. These categories include: suburban feeder, urban feeder, line -haul, crosstown, all -day express, peak express, and commuter express. Four performance factors would be used in the evaluation process: passengers per revenue hour, passengers per revenue mile, subsidy per passenger, and passenger miles per seat mile. This policy would also be used to prioritize new services. Potential new services would be evaluated based on three factors: passengers per revenue hour, passengers per revenue mile, and subsidy per passenger. A continuous index, based on the ratio of a given route's performance in these specific measures to the average of all routes in that service category along with the individual measures, is used as the evaluation tools in both the new and existing service evaluation. This policy applies to all Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) bus operators providing service in the MTDB area. Member Agencies: City of Chula Vista. City of Coronado. City of El Cajon. City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa. City of Lemon Grove. City of National City. City of Poway. City of San Diego. City of Santee. County of San Diego. State of California Metropolitan Transit Development Board is Coordinator of the Metropolitan Transit System and is Regulatory Authority for (� Paratransit AdministrationC_ 11 Subsidiary Corporations: f PI San Diego Transit Corporation, (� 1 San Diego Trolley. Inc. and a 1 San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Company POLICY: Existing Service Evaluation Methodology This policy details three levels of service evaluation. Each level requires a varying level of analysis and corresponding action (Attachment A). 43.1 Trip -Level Analysis. Trip -level analysis is done as part of the ongoing service evaluation process. This analysis uses passenger complaints, field reports, and operator input to determine where minor adjustments could be made to the existing system. Adjustments are then identified that would remedy trips that are chronically late, overcrowded, or offer poor transfer connections. Service adjustments in this category could be handled at the operator's discretion and are not subject to Board approval. 43.2 Route -Level Analysis. Once a year, an annual route monitoring report is compiled. This report provides detailed route -level analyses that measure service productivity, cost-effectiveness, and subsidy levels. Each route is compared to all others in its service category (e.g., line -haul, crosstown, express, dial -a -ride, etc.) using the category average and a continuous index. The continuous index is based upon the ratio of a route's performance on a given specific measure to the average of all routes in that service category. The index uses four performance measures in compiling the average for a route. The four measures include: passengers per revenue mile, passengers per revenue hour, subsidy per passenger, and passenger miles per seat mile. Routes fall into four tiers of evaluation: • Average/Above Average (1.0 or above) — Routes that fall within this category are performing generally satisfactory and trigger no additional analysis. However, a route in this tier is not precluded from special analysis if some operating aspect is felt to require improvement. • Ongoing Monitoring (0.99 - 0.75) — Routes that fall within this category are performing slightly below the systemwide average but are generally assumed to meet a marginal performance level. These routes require no action, but ongoing monitoring is needed to ensure that the level of performance doesn't decline. • Evaluate (0.74 - 0.50) — Routes that fall within this category are performing well below the systemwide average. They require some level of evaluation. A route -segment analysis may be required, which evaluates the route by time of day and route segment to determine where service improvements can be made. • Action (0.49 or below) — Routes that fall within this category are performing at half the systemwide average and measurable action is required. Steps that can be taken include major route restructuring, fare restructuring, or route elimination. C-12 The existing evaluation process will also provide input into the five-year budget process. MTDB has rarely eliminated entire routes in the past, and route elimination would be a last resort under this policy. Individual routes that are designated for elimination would be subjected to a lifeline services review. This review would evaluate population density thresholds in the route's service area (to determine if there is adequate population to support the route), proximity to other transit services, and level of access in the absence of the route to key destination points within the community. It should be noted that high levels of transit utilization are nearly always observed in transit -dependent neighborhoods. In conjunction with the annual route -level analysis, a three-year rolling average will be completed to determine if the averages within the year being analyzed are reflective of how a category has been performing over time. Both the relative average of the four measures and any anomalies in the results of each of the four measures will be used to trigger further review or action on a particular route. New Service Evaluation 43.3 Regional and Subregional Analysis. Regional and subregional planning studies are conducted on an annual basis to focus on possible improvements in service coverage, efficiency, and connectivity. These improvements can result in major service additions and changes. These changes will be evaluated as part of the new service evaluation. 43.4 New Service Evaluation. The process for evaluation of new transit services will incorporate these elements: • the services must be described in sufficient detail to be able to estimate cost, revenue, revenue miles of operation, and ridership; and • those, new service proposals not included in the SRTP will not be evaluated. 43.5 New services subjected to this policy include the following: • New bus routes • Extensions of existing routes • Any frequency or span -of -service improvements to existing routes that result in an increase in projected operating cost or mileage • Other new services (demand -responsive, employee shuttles, etc.) 43.6 Evaluation Guidelines. Development of the proposed new services will be guided as follows: -3- C-13 43.6a Cost estimation will rely on existing unit costs for similar types of service. Fully allocated costs will be used for new routes. For existing route extensions and frequency or span -of -service improvements, the marginal cost of service expansion, plus an overhead factor of 15 percent will be used. 43.6b MTDB's ridership estimation model will be used to project patronage. MTDB operations and planning staff will review all ridership estimates to ensure reasonableness. Ridership diversion from existing routes will be considered on a case -by -case basis. Revenue estimation will rely on the average fare for similar existing types of service. The model considers transfer opportunities to other bus routes or to the trolley, thus taking account of transit network factors. 43.6c Marketing efforts will be undertaken for all new services. These efforts are not specified in the policy because different markets of potential riders will require use of a variety of techniques. 43.7 Evaluation Procedure. The procedure for evaluating the new service proposals will use the continuous index as described above for existing services. 43.7a To qualify for implementation, a new route or expanded service must meet or exceed 0.50 to 0.75 of the systemwide average. Within 24 months, the route must increase its performance to within 0.75 to 0.99 of the systemwide average. 43.7b All new routes or extensions would be categorized as trial routes. They would not be considered part of the overall system until they had been in service for two years and/or reached the 0.75 to 0.99 performance levels. Ongoing evaluation would be conducted throughout the first 24 months that the service is in place. Quarterly reports on the status of these routes would be provided to the Board as part of the ongoing quarterly operations reports. Board action will be required to retain these services. 43.7c Implementation of selected new services will be integrated into the annual budget development process, which is expected to yield a specific funding level for new routes/service enhancements. The highest-ranking proposal will be implemented first, followed by the next highest and so on until available funding is exhausted. In cases where a choice must be made between proposals of equal rank in different service categories, it is appropriate to consider other policy goals in selecting a proposal for implementation. Trial routes that meet the minimum criteria of this policy but cannot be implemented due to funding limitations can be carried over to the next fiscal year for reevaluation and reranking. 43.7d The time frame for evaluation is two years, with interim six-month and one-year targets established by MTDB staff based on analysis of market growth curves for similar types of service. -4- C-14 43.7e At the end of the evaluation time frame, the Board must act to include the service as a permanent part of the transit system. If the Board does not vote to make the service part of the regular system, the service will not be continued. A decision not to continue a trial project would not require a public hearing. MTDB staff can propose early acceptance of a trial project as a permanent part of the transit system if the service's performance meets its targets before the end of the two-year evaluation time frame. MTDB staff can also propose early discontinuation of a trial route if its early performance is well below expected levels. 43.7f Both the relative average of the three factors and any anomalies in any of the three factors can trigger further review or action. 43.8 Funding. Outside funding contributed to the operation of the route will not be considered in revenue calculations. It will be the decision of the Board to determine what role the additional revenue will play in the implementation of a new route. Any new route implemented as a result of outside funding will be considered a trial route as long as outside funding is used to support it. 43.9 Ferry Services. On an annual basis, a peer analysis of similar ferry services will be conducted. This analysis will be used to determine how San Diego's ferry service is performing compared to other similar services. PSmith POLICY43.JWILLI 1 /7/00 Attachment: A. Summary of Evaluation Procedures and Measures for Transit Service Modifications Original Policy Accepted on 4/08/93 Policy Revised on 12/8/94 Policy Repealed and Readopted on 1 /13/00 -5- C-15 EVALUATION PROCEDURES SUMMARY OF EVALUATION PROCEDURES AND MEASURES FOR TRANSIT SERVICE MODIFICATIONS FREQUENCY EVALUATION MEASURES OUTCOMES AND ACTIONS TRIP LEVEL Passenger complaints Driver and supervisor reports Operators' time checks Operators' load checks As received As received As needed As needed Identification of problems to be checked Identification of problems to be checked Percent of trips missed/on-time Peak load counts Peak occupancy • Operations adjustments ROUTE LEVEL Public comments As received • Identification of potential improvements Operators' suggestions Farebox/vendomat counts Route Evaluation Report SANDAG on/off counts REGIONAL OR SUBREGIONAL LEVEL As received Daily Annually Annually Identification of potential improvements • Number of passengers by type of fare By route: • Pass boardings/revenue mile • Pass miles/seat mile •- Subsidy/boarding pass • Bus stop/trolley station counts • Loading profiles • Peak load counts Average trip lengths Vehicle seat miles of service Percent of trips on -time MTS quarterly reports Area planning studies Short -Range Transit Plan SANDAG Regional Transportation Plan SANDAG On Board Survey Quarterly As needed Annually Two years Five Years By operator: • Total passengers • Farebox recovery ratio • Subsidy/boarding pass • Passenger boardings/revenue mile • Service proposals and analyses (subregional) • Service proposals and analyses (regionwide) • Service and facility proposals and analyses (regional) • Trip patterns • Trip purpose and frequency • Demographics and attitudes • Mode/distance to/from stops Fare type • Service enhancements, reductions, restructuring • • Market research and advertising • Market research • Planing studies • Service enhancements, reductions, restructuring • New service proposals • Capital facility proposals BWashi T•PROCEE 2/21!BB AS.WLIEBE Att. D, Al No. 33, 6/22/00, FIN 310 REGIONAL TRANSIT SERVICES FORMULA GOALS Jurisdiction FY 00 Formula FY 01 Formula Goal Formula Chula Vista 1 1.1 % 21.10% 48.4% Coronado 90.0% 50.00% 78.8% El Cajon 16.9% 26.90% 41.4% Imperial Beach 69.1% 50.00% 40.2% La Mesa 36.5% 46.50% 69.6% Lemon Grove 5.0% 10.00% 38.1% National City 10.0% 10.00% 33.9% Poway 5.0% 5.00% 3.7% San Diego 43.5% 43.50% 34.4% Santee 10.0% 20.00% 27.8% County of San Diego 7.3% _ 17.30% 19.2% DGunn/T- T-REGTRSRVSFOR.TLARWI 6/16/00 D-1 MTDB AREA FY 2002 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) ESTIMATED TDA ARTICLE 4.0 APPORTIONMENTS FY 01 TDA Article 4.0 Apportionments Projected FY 02 Apportionments Based on FY 00 Interim Regional Formula Based on Regional Goal Formula (1) Based on Mitigated Regional Goal Formula (2) TDA Article 4.0 Regional Regional Local TDA Article 4.0 Regional Regional Local Regional Regional Local Jurisdiction FY 01 Amount Fund % Deductions (3) Services FY 02 Amount Fund % Deductions (3) Services Fund % Deductions (3) Services Chula Vista $4,357,226 21.10% $1,097,952 $3,259,274 $4,562,586 48.40% $2,527,706 $2,034,860 21.10% $1,340,547 $3,222,019 Coronado 749,455 50.00% 398,823 350,632 784,774 50.00% 431,887 352,887 50.00% 431,887 352,887 El Cajon 2,493,728 28.90% 811,739 1,881,989 2,811,249 41.40% 1,354,135 1,257,114 41.40% 1,354,135 1,257,114 Imperial Beach 753,813 50.00% 491,027 262,786 789,338 40.20% 469,440 319,898 40.20% 469,440 319,898 La Mesa 1,530,882 48.50% 734,812 798,070 1,603,027 50.00% 875,013 728,014 50.00% 875,013 728,014 Lemon Grove 670,320 10.00% 126,626 543,694 701,910 38.10% 358,855 343,055 30.00% 304,673 397,237 National City 1,434,489 10.00% 318,559 1,115,910 1,502,071 33.90% 748,133 753,938 18.00% 520,593 981,478 Poway 1,263,048 5.00% 76,268 1,188,778 1,322,569 3.70% 108,841 1,213,928 3.70% 108,841 1,213,928 Santee 1,497,840 20.00% 382,665 1,115,175 1568427.189 27.80% 592,451 975,976 27.80% 592,451 975.976 San Diego County 4,934,344 19.20% $1,029,246 3,905,098 5,186,881 19.20% 1,404,385 3,762,496 19,20% 1,404,385 3,762,496 Subtotal $19,885,123 $5,487,717 $14,217,406 $20,612,810 $8,870,648 $11,742,184 $7,401,765 $13,211,045 San Diego 32,736,441 43.50% 14,442,525 18,293,918 34,279,190 34.40% 14,976,201 19,302,989 43.50% 17,949,098 16,330,092 Total $52,421,564 $19,910,242 $32,511,322 $54,892,000 $23,848,847 $31,045,153 $25,350,863 $29,541,137 r*1 (1) Applies goal formula based on each jurisdiction's percent of transit riders using regional transit. (2) Attempts to mitigate regional formula from goal formula in (1) to provide sufficient funds for one year of local operations. (3) Includes ADA off -the top + Regional Formula + Bus Replacement. 02ESTIMATESSummary 6/15/00 m H 0 OIE NId `00/ZZ/9 `££ ADA BUDGET PROJECTIONS FY02 Sources of Funds Article 4.0 Off the TOP i000's) FY01 ACTUAL 000's) FY02 PROJECTION (0oo's) Chula Vista $48 $214 Coronado $8 $37 El Cajon $27 $123 Imperial Beach $8 $37_ La Mesa $17 $75 Lemon Grove $7 $33 National City $16 $71 Poway $14 $62 Santee $16 $74 San Diego County $54 $243 San Diego $358 $1,610 TOTAL $573 $2,577 Note: FY02 Is projected based on the five year forecast of $2,677,000 needed in FY02 with a projected carryover from FY01 of $100,000 deducted. ADAPROJECTFY02 8/13/00 BUS CAPITAL REPLACEMENT PLAN PROJECTIONS Sources of Funds FY01 FY02 4% inflation adjustment FY02 vehicle adjustments FY02 TOTAL REQUIRED NOTES Chula Vista $141 $147 $62 $209 5 added vehicles and added mileage Coronado $20 $21 $0 $21 no change El Cajon $121 $126 $75 $201 CTS 11 added vehicles+ DAR vehicles Imperial Beach $110 $114 $16 $130 MTDB added vehicles and added mileage La Mesa $14 $15 $21 $36 CTS 11 added vehicles Lemon Grove $53 $55 $16 $71 CTS 11 added vehicles+ MTDB added mileage National City $161 $167 $25 $192 plus 2 vehicles plus added mileage Poway $0 $0 $0 $0 no change Santee $70 $73 $30 $103 CTS 11 added vehicles San Diego County $131 $136 $80 $216 CTS 11 added vehicles+ DAR vehicles Non-MTDB Contributions $821 $854 $325 $1,179 San Diego $1,899 $1,975 $235 $2,128 added vehicles and mileage Regional Service Fund NA NA NA NA TOTAL $2,720 $2,829 $560 $3,307 Note: FY02 are estimated. BUSCAPITALFY02.xls 6/11/00 IA METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT FINANCE PROPOSED FUNDING CONSOLIDATION Problems •. Inefficient Process: Transit monies are used in unorganized and inefficient fashion: federal all under MTDB, TDA (state Transportation Development Act) to cities and county, TransNet to MTDB. • Less than Optimum Use of Local Funds: Local TDA funds not leveraged to maximum: in the past 100% used for projects rather than 20%. • Intercity/Regional Service Falls Through Funding Gap: Service between cities (i.e., regional services like the Trolley) funded through a TDA formula (regional services formula) based upon 1984 conditions (with minor update by several participating cities several years ago). • Regional Services Formula is "Broke": it was based upon 1984 data, and updated once (not unanimously). Based upon SB 664 (see below) it was changed in February 2000 for FY 01. Developing a fair formula that provides the needed revenue and does not adversely impact local service is not easy (or perhaps even possible). • Regional Programs Need Funding: ADA paratransit complementary service is a federal unfunded mandate that needs a metro area approach to funding Operation and maintenance of multi -operator transit centers falls through the funding gap, too. • Significant, Ongoing Capital Needs Remain: MTS bus replacement will be continuous. • Funding for Local Services Will Not Be Sufficient in the Future: an increasing number of cities will not be able to afford the costs of local services, plus, regional and ADA services, and bus replacement. Background • Review Initiated in April 1999: At April 1999 Budget Workshop, MTD Board of Directors authorized review. • Transit Financing Subcommittee Formed: Chaired by Vice Chair Jerry Rindone, it has met 13 times since April 1999 to work through the details of the proposal. Also, a staff committee from all local jurisdictions has met continuously. • SB 664 (Alpert), 1999: This legislation changed two major aspects of the TDA: 1. It allows for a change in the regional services formula based upon a majority vote of the Board (previously it was unanimous vote), and 2. It set a maximum to the amount of TDA that could go to regional services at 50%. Senator Alpert also gave notice that this was an interim step and that there would be a bill this year to make further refinements. • FY 01 TDA Actions Taken: As noted above the MTD Board took action in February 2000 to make changes for FY 01. • Proposal is For FY 02: The proposal would begin a process in July 2000 that would lead to changes beginning in FY 02. This process would allow some comfort to be developed with a7: the details over the next year and a locally generated legislative change in 2001, rather than a state -mandated one in 2000. Proposal • Consolidate ALL Transit Funds in Metropolitan Area: All monies would be consolidated under MTDB: federal, state, TDA, TransNet. • Basis for the Process would be Service not Costs: There would be no formulas; rather, all new service and capital project proposals would be evaluated and funded on a metropolitan -wide basis using MTDB policies. • Proposed Funding Priorities: 1. ADA complementary paratransit service 2. Capital grants (local share for federal formula grants) 3. Local and regional service • SRTP and CIP Provide Basis for New Projects: MTDB's Short Range Transit Plan (SRTP) and Capital Improvement Program process would be expanded to include the local jurisdictions more directly. The process would begin in July for both the SRTP and CIP and lead to adoption in December each year. This then would lead into the budget development process in January of the following year for action on all funding matters in June. Some Other Critical Features • Local Service "Guarantee": Based upon current operations, each year the existing level of service that would be "guaranteed" as a base for the next year. • New Service Proposals: MTDB's Policy No. 43 would be used to objectively evaluate all new service proposals. However, high priority would be given to major capital investment projects, such as LRT extensions. • Service Cutbacks: Any cutbacks to service would be accomplished in a series of steps, applied to the entire metropolitan area, and with regard to lifeline system of routes. • Operational Budgets for Minor Service Improvements: Contingency budgets of $25,000 would be provided each operator for minor service changes during the year. • Capital Projects would Benefit by Use of Federal Capital Funds: All capital projects (over $50,000) would use federal transit funds at 80% federal and 20% local match. • One TDA Claim: Today there are seven claims. This proposed process would be similar to NCTD's with significantly more control and local involvement. And, far more efficient and simpler. • Operator and Local Discretionary Reserve: Existing local reserves would be "grandfathered" and consolidated into one reserve under MTDB with each jurisdiction's share independently tracked and accruing interest. • MTDB Assumes All Financial Risks: The financial planning and programming would rest in one place: MTDB. TDA Talking Points 6-00.doc 06/20/00 1:21 PM -2- MTDB Area Transit Financing Al #33, 6/22/00 MTDB Transit Financing • Initiated review in April 1999 • SB 664 (Alpert) passed into law in 1999 — limits 50% on "regional" service TDA $ — allows majority MTDB vote • Remaining problems — out-of-date regional formula — "poor" and "rich" cities — bus replacement and ADA services 6/21100 Proposed: Funding Consolidation • Eliminate formulas • Consolidate ALL transit resources • Single "claim" rather than multiple • Fund ADA services "off the top" • Next, fund local share of federal formula capital grants • "Balance" local and regional services 621 /00 e 1 MTDB Area Transit Financing Al #33, 6/22/00 PROPOSED TDA CLAIM PROCESS TOTAL TDA FUNDS AVAILABLE NCTO Claim SAN DAD Planning S Bicycle Program Arabia 4.3 Subtotal Ava*abN for Distribution MTDB Area Arabia 4.0 ADA Sarvloas Capital Fund MTDB CIeMn MTO Board Approves SAN DAD Board Approval County Non -Beard Claim 40101110. ill it V 7 Policy Areas A. ADA Complementary Service Costs B. Balancing Local -Regional Services C. Fare Structure D. SRTP and CIP Process E. Unified, Single Claim F. Use of Reserves G. Capital $ vs. Operations $ 621 /W 1 MTDB Area Transit Financing AI #33, 6/22/00 A. ADA Complementary Service Costs • Continue competitive award • Maintain existing level as required by ADA • Evaluate improved transfer connections among zones • Evaluate management arrangement • Evaluate seamless fares 621 /00 B. Balancing Local - Regional Services • "Guarantee" prior year local service — Report on an annual basis • MTDB Policy No. 43 as "basis" — Existing service: continuous evaluation —Address local circulator routes & expresses — Service proposals evaluated thru SRTP — High priority to major capital investments 621/00 `•- 6� 2 3� MTDB Area Transit Financing AI #33, 6/22/00 B. Balancing (cont'd) • New service investments — Prioritize through Policy 43 — Evaluate during budget development • Systemwide cutbacks - 1st: preserve route, reduce hours - 2nd: preserve peak, reduce off peak — 3rd: preserve lifeline system of routes — Develop lifeline" system 621 /00 C. Fare Structure • Review fare policy changes for implementation in FY 01 • Conduct comprehensive review of fare policy in FY 01 — All categories — ADA fares — Seamless countywide 6/21/00 -%8 e 3 MTDB Area Transit Financing AI #33, 6/22/00 D. SRTP and CIP Process • Adoption of both in December • "Threshold" determinations allow for small projects/changes • SRTP & CIP process begins in July — includes local jurisdictions and operators — 1st year of SRTP leads to claim and budget process in spring 621/W E. Unified, Single Claim • Same as with NCTD since 1976 —but...with more local involvement • Tied directly in with the SRTP, CIP, and budget process • Now Proposed 7 claims 2 claims 11 actions 1 action 621/00 ti0 c 4 MTDB Area Transit Financing Al #33, 6/22/00 F. Use of Reserves • Develop expenditure plan for future needs for SDTC, SDTI, MTDB contract services • Establish single "local discretionary reserve fund" for grants and special local projects — keep separate by operator — keep separate by local jurisdiction 6/21/00 G. Capital $ vs. Operations $ • 70% of federal formula $ eligible for preventive maintenance — 15% used this way on average • Begin budget process at 15% for ops • Any use above 15%: explicit policy choice 6/21/00 5 MTDB Area Transit Financing AI #33, 6/22/00 6 Household Hazardous Waste Types (Attachment B) Acceptable HHW Waste Types Pesticides Oil & Latex Paints Gasoline, Diesel, two cycle fuels Fertilizers Oil & Water Based Stains Over the Counter Fuel Additives Herbicides Oil & Water Based Varnishes Antifreeze Pool & Spa Chemicals Wood Preservatives Oil and Oil Filters Partially full Aerosol Containers Thinners & Solvents Transmission Fluid S Strippers & stripper waste Brake Fluid Bleach Rust removers Carburetor and parts cleaners Drain Openers Lubricants Car Batteries Corrosive Household Chemicals Hobby Chemicals Automotive bondo, filers & Paints Detergents & Spot Removers Photography Chemicals Automotive Wax, polishes & cleaners Unused Prescriptions* Glues & Adhesives Auto & Marine Flares* Pet Chemicals and medications Marine Varnishes & Paints Household Dry Cell Batteries Marine Deck & Hull Coverings Ammunition* Household Rechargeable Batteries Marine Cleaners & solvents Sharps* M Marine Oil skimmer socks Containers over 5 gallons or 40ibs** Roofing Tar, patch & other liquid or semi -solid repair Radioactive household products such as smoke alarms* O'I Marine/Surfboard resins/epoxy r , antifreeze, paint and other proaucts collected under the Standard fee shall be in containers of five gallons or less. *These products will not be collected as part of the standard HHW door-to-door collection program however, they may be collected as part of a future drop-off program or other means mutually agreeable the City and Consultant. **These products will be accepted at the Generator's expense or by prior written approval of the City. Unacceptable Waste Types for the Door -to -Door Collection Program Materials not Identified by Manufacturer or Generator Commercial or Industrial HHW Biological , Medical or Infectious Wastes & Sharps Explosives, Ammunition and Marine Flares Materials that are packaged in a manner that is not safe to transport and Auto Flares Radioactive materials including smoke alarms 2pty12.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Twelfth Revision) January 20, 1999 Page 24 o No. 1- 0 f 209 C Date. July 21, 1999 eaffilptione Clear Solutions to Contaminated Material problems Certificate of Assurance and Indemnification City of National Ci SafetyKleen Corp. provides solvents for use In our equipment and In customer owned equipment. Safety.Kle.en also removes contaminated materials from Its customers' premises for processing. Safetyt Bert certifies to you that as long es you comply with applicable laws and regulations and the tetras of your agreement with Safaty.Kleen, 5afeiyKleen assumes full responsibility for those materials once SafetyKteeti removes them from your facility: • We agree to Irarisport stare, recycle, reclaim, re•reMe and dispose of the contaminated materials we remove from your facility in accordance with all applicable state and federal laws and regulations. • In the event a spill occurs while we are transporting, storing,.recycling, reclaiming, relebning or disposing of your contaminated materials we will pay all costs and expenses. io.plean.up that spill.:• • 'Its the event ground or water pollution results from bui ttarisporling, slating, recycling, reclaiming, re•reflning or disposal of your contaminated materials, we will pay all costs and expenses tt :terhedy that pollution. SafelyWeen agrees to indemnify, defend and hold you harmless from all liability arising ham SafetyKieen's transporting, storing, recycling, reclaiming, re -refining or disposing of your materials including, but not limited to the costs of any remedial action under the Comprehensive Envl oninental Response, Compensation and liability Act of 19:1 (also known as Superfund) or comparable slate law, provided Ihal you comply with applicable laws and regulations and the terms of your agreement with SafelyKleen. For Over $1,000,000,000 In Assets NYSE Symbol: (SKI D&B Rating: 5A2 '01909 Snitly Keen Gro Prkimd In USA co ncy,W per. FETY•KL. EN CORP. hn G.J•inson, Jr. Idea Chit/ Executive Officer 'i�•y' i ,: :� ,"e ^.: =-: � " it--��5� '7 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 PREPARED zY EXPLANATION. AGENDA ITEM NO. 70 National City Community Concert Band Proposal Tom G. McCabe DEPARTMENT City Manager This proposal is submitted to the Mayor and City Council, the National City Adult School and the National City Chamber of Commerce by C. Edward Reed. The concept of a community concert band has merit. There are also costs associated with such a venture, some of which are delineated in the proposal, as well as others, which are unknown. Council should hear from Mr. Reed and the other named members of the proposed Joint Partnership. Enviroorriental Review Financial Statement City cost as proposed: (1) $15,000 first year; (2) $10,000 subsequent years; (3) Unknown staff and facility usage costs. -.•._ i ST A F F RECOMMENDATION Direction of Council requested. ON RECOMMENDAVON BOARD/ Account No. "PO_TACHMENTS (Listed Resolution No, Proposal for the formation of the National City Community Concert Band A-200 (Rev 9/80) A PROPOSAL FOR THE FORMATION OF THE "NATIONAL CITY COMMUNITY CONCERT BAND" A JOINT PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY THE NATIONAL CITY ADULT SCHOOL and the CITIZENS AND MERCHANTS OF NATIONAL CITY submitted to The City of National City Mayor George H. Waters Vice Mayor Fred Soto Councilmember Mitch Beauchamp Councilmember Ralph Inzunza Councilmember Ron Morrison The National City Adult School Principal Lynne Robinson The National City Chamber of Commerce Executive Director Edith Hughes Presented by C. Edward Reed July 6, 2000 gio-2903 pay" MISSION STATEMENT FOR THE NATIONAL CITY COMMUNITY CONCERT BAND The mission of the National City Community Concert Band is to: • provide an opportunity for experienced musicians from National City to pursue their love of playing concert band literature. • contribute to the cultural enrichment of the citizens of National City by presenting free public performances for their enjoyment. • present a model of "Lifelong learning and Enrichment" which will both benefit and inspire the performers and listeners. • mentor younger musicians in the community and encourage them to continue the pleasure of playing and performing past their school years. • contribute, through its transgenerational membership. to better understanding, communication and appreciation between the generations represented. NCCCB MEMBERSHIP The membership of the NCCCB is to come from National City residents, those who are attending, or who have attended in the past, schools in National City, and those who are working in National City. Other musicians may be invited from time to time to occupy vacant chairs at the discretion of the director, but the large majority of the musicians are to come from those who have strong ties to National City. CONCERTS It is anticipated that the NCCCB will present four free public concerts for the enjoyment of the citizens of National City each year. There are several possible sites which have been suggested as suitable: Kimball Bowl Granger Hall NC Community Building National City Churches Sweetwater H S Fine Arts Theater Sweetwater H S Gymnatorium THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY The City would provide funds annually for expenses of maintaining the band. An expenditure of $15,000.00 is requested for the first year, which would include an extra amount for start up costs. $10,000.00 is requested for subsequent years. This amount set aside would cover expenses for, but not be limited to, the following: • Director compensation for time in rehearsals and concerts and Community Concert Program preparation (not to exceed $5000.00 per annum). • New sheet music for the Band's library to be used for Community Concerts. This expense would be for music not available from the National City Adult School Instrumental Music Library. • Additional musicians as needed for concerts. For example, if the band was lacking a bassoonist for a particular concert, and one was deemed necessary in presentation of the music, one could he hired to cover the part in performance. This is a contingency item, as it would be hoped that no extra musicians would be necessary for performances. • Appropriate repair for instruments used by the Community Band. This would cover any inadvertent damage done to school instruments by members of the NCCCB using them. Matching funds would be provided by the National City Adult School in conjunction with this expense. • Use of the City's portable stage for outdoor Community Concerts. • Moving music stands, percussion instruments and tubas from storage to concert venues and return to storage following the concert. • Incidental expenses such as postage, printing, etc. • The purchase of one tuba for the NCCCB. Startup item, first year. NATIONAL CITY ADULT SCHOOL The National City Adult School will provide strong support for the National City Community Concert Band. This support will include, but not be limited to, the following: • A rehearsal hall with chairs and music stands for the use of the Band. • A legal sized file cabinet suitable for music storage. • Percussion equipment including a concert snare drum, concert bass drum, cymbals, timpani, chimes and appropriate trap instruments as requested by the director. • An allocation for repair to match that of the City for instrument repair for school instruments used by the Band members. • Use of a large Instrumental Sheet Music Library • Duplication services as needed by the Director. • Adult School compensation for the "Teacher of Record." • Bus transportation of Band and Equipment, as appropriate, for concert performances. (Monday through Saturday) • Additional instruments, at the Director's request, as inventory and budget allows. • A budget for the purchase of new music, as requested by the Director.. THE CITIZENS AND MERCHANTS OF NATIONAL CITY It is anticipated that many in the Business Community and the Community at large will take an active interest in support of the National City Community Concert Band • Community resources would contribute monetary gifts and gifts in kind. • It is anticipated that some merchants would donate money for special projects, sponsoring concerts, and assisting with advertising. • Some individual citizens may contribute monetary gifts to assist in the enlarging the inventory of music and instruments. • Many will contribute by volunteering their time in setting up for rehearsals and concerts. • Others will assist by ushering at Community concert events and all kinds of behind the scenes involvement. • The Band Librarian and assistants will volunteer countless hours in preparing music for distribution in rehearsals and collecting and resorting for storage. (In many musical organizations this is a paid position.) ESTIMATED EXPENSES TO ESTABLISH. THE NATIONAL CITY COMMUNITY CONCERT BAND Item Concern cost est. N C Adult City of N C Comm. 1 Rehearsal Hall provided _ x 2 Stands provided x 3 Chairs provided x 4 Legal File Cabinet for Music $100.00 $100.00 5 Percussion Equipment provided x 6 Percussion Mallets $300.00 -$300.00 7 Repair Budget $2,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 8 Duplication $1,000.00 $1,000.00 9 Music Folders $100.00 $100.00 10 March Books $250.00 $250.00 11 Chorale Books $250.00 $250.00 12 Bus Trans for Band out of City ??? x 13 Director Salary $5,000.00 $5,000.00 14 Asst. Director Salary $5,000.00 $5,000.00 15 Equip. trans. For Concerts tbd x x 16 Rehearsal Hall set up/tear down donated x 17 Ushers donated x 18 Advertising ??? x 19 Postage ??? x 20 Concert Program Printing ??1? 21 $ for extra musicians (concerts) $2,000.00 $2,000.00 22 Custodial Services provided x 23 Sheet Music Library provided x 24 New Sheet Music $1,000.00 $400.00 $600.00 25 2 Alto Clarinets provided x 26 2 Bass Clarinets provided x 27 1 Contra Alto Clarinet provided x 28 1 Bassoon $2,000.00 $2,000.00 29 1 Oboe $1,000.00 $1,000.00 30 1 Baritone Saxophone provided 31 1 Double French Horn $1,250.00 $1,250.00 32 2 Baritones $1,600.00 $1,600.00 33 2 New Tubas $6,104.00 $3,052.00 $3,052.00 34 4th Tympani $2,000.00 $2,000.00 35 Grover snare set up $100.00 $100.00 36 percussion tuning & adjust donated x 37 portable stage/outside concerts ??? x 38 Librarian donated x 39 Library Assistants donated x 40 other expenditures $3,348.00 $3,348.00 x TOTAL $34,402.00 $19,052.00 $15,000.00 $350.00 Prepared by Ed Reed 7/6/00 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21 ITEM TITLE FORMATION OF A 2000 CODUNCIL FEE COMMITTEE PREPARED BY Kathleen Trees, Director 1 DEPARTMENT Building & Safety EXPLANATION To avoid large user fee increases, the City Council has previously recommended more frequent modest user fee increases to keep pace with inflation. The last City user fee review was conducted in 1995. Due to increases in labor, materials and supplies, some of the current user fees may not be sufficient to cover the cost of City services. In addition, new services may have been added in which the fees have not been established. During the 1995 user fee review the City Council formed a Fee Committee to oversee the review process and to formulate recommendations for consideration by the entire Council. The 1995 Council Fee Committee consisted of Councilman Inzunza and Councilman Beauchamp. The Council Fee Committee worked closely with staff and provided valuable input into the user fee review process, which resulted in a thorough and comprehensive report being presented to the entire Council. We are recommending that two Council members be appointed to constitute the 2000 Council Fee Committee to oversee the user fee review and to develop recommendations for consideration by the entire City Council. Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A X N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the City Council designate two Council members to serve as the 2000 Council Fee Committee BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. N/A A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT August 1, 2000 MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 22 (-ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — McCUNE-CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH-JEEP USED VEHICLE TENT SALE PREPARED BYKathleen Trees, Director EXPLANATION EPARTMENT Building and Safety This is a request from McCune -Chrysler -Plymouth -Jeep to conduct a three day used vehicle tent sale on Lot 2 at the Plaza Bonita Shopping Center, from Friday, August 11— Sunday, August 13, 2000. The hours of the sale are 10:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The City has incurred $115.00 in costs in processing the T.U.P. application through various City Account No, N/A Departments. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Liisted Below } Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and/or stipulations. c/A200.DOC A-200 (9/80) City of National City Building & Safety Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 Application For A Temporary Use Permit Application is hereby made for a temporary use permit pursuant to the provision of the National City Municipal Code 15.60 and as described below. Temporary Use Permits (TUP) are ministerial administrative regulations intended to provide orderly and effective management of specific list of temporary land uses having exceptional characteristics requiring their review and limitations. Any permit applicant may appeal the action of the Building Official pursuant to Municipal Code section 15.60.045. Class A & B use Application for a Temporary use permit must be filed 15 working days prior to the commencement of the activity/event. Activities/events involving the use or areas of operation within the state highway jurisdiction shall be filed not less than six (6) months prior to the requested activity/event. Please Complete: (Print or Type) Sponsoring Organization(s): Organization Address: '` C-i 7 r 6J !� City: Al{]-i IfjA (,I State:/�(- Zip: Location of Event: L �7 ©,UU %es% Phone: C. P) 477 /D. 4- Dates(s) Requested for Event: AU6c) S Z. I (I t?-t i ZCs00 Hours of Use on Day of Event: From: / (? To: / 0 A First Day: Setup - Date: A-01 [0, Zoa Time: ( Pil4 eardown - Date: Au 7 13 r zoo Time: /Q A Last Day: Setup - Date: Avy U t Zcyo Time: /0 AM/P1b1 Teardown - Date: t Lew Time: 6,A t Br}}ef Description of Event (Al5tanmary of the event may by Attached to the application): (1 I A -A 0..5z ( r Name of Person Responsible For The Event Who Will Be On -Site The Day Of The Event: How May This Person Be Contacted? (9_ 4-74 33 )- Specific Use Request: 1.t7 t. Justification: 717er -VALE Request to Sell or Serve Alcohol Beverages: Yes [ ] No ] Will Food/Drinks Be Sold: Yes [ ] No ] Note: The City Council will not approve the sale or consumption of alcohol in City parks in conjunction with any event requiring a TUP. This prohibition will not impact the existing policy regarding the sale or consumption of alcohol withinbuildings in the parks, such as the Community Center, which will continue to be subject to the approval of the City Council. ' Will Tents or Canopies be Used?: Yes [x] No [ ] If"Yes," permit may be required from Fire Department Waiver of Fees Requested: Yes ( ] No [ If "Yes," complete attached supplemental questionnaire form Facilities (When Applicable - Request Assistance with the Following) Noise, Crowd, Traffic Control: % C� Security Control: N C) Parking/Barricades: del Li Exterior Lighting/Electrical: /\/ 0 Trash Disposal/Site Clean-up After Event: / .1 01 Sanitary Facilities: �U 0 Name of Applicant: A/C // Address: ?r Signature of Applicant: 6/ 14-a.s Ai E2 ✓ iV , C sue' Phone: (/ (') 4 7 Date: 7 -. 0� - This Form Become A4ermit When Endorsed By The Building & Safety Director (over) For Office Use Only Permit Fees: Permit No: Use Group: Use Class: Bond: Permit Exp.Date: Specific Stipulations/Comments: Approvals/Stipulations (Check where Applicable): Initial Date PLANNING Yes [ FIRE Yes [ PUBLIC WORKS Yes [ FINANCE Yes [ POLICE Yes [ PARKS & REC. Yes [ ENGINEERING Yes [ CITY ATTORNEY Yes [ RISK MANAGER Yes [ DEV. Yes [ OTHER Yes [ I ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 ] ] No [ ] No [ I No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ I No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ ] 1 j ] ] ] ] ] ] ] Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date , Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date COMM-UNITY Initial Date City Council Meeting Date: Temporary Use Permit: Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Waiver of Fees: Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Property Notification Required: Yes [ ] No [ ] Comments: Date: BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND/OR STIPULATIONS SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: McCune Chrysler Plymouth Jeep EVENT: Used Vehicle Tent Sale DATE OF EVENT: August 11-13, 2000 TIME: 10:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. APPROVALS: PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE STIP/COMMENTS [ ] FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE STIP/COMMENTS [x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE STIP/COMMENTS [x ] SPECIFIC STIPULATIONS/COMMENTS: FIRE (336-4550) 1. Fire department access shall be maintained at all times. 2. All Fire department connections must remain unobstructed at all times. 3. A minimum of four exits are required. They must be clearly marked and be a minimum of ten feet wide. 4. The maximum occupancy shall not exceed 107 people and signs shall be posted to that effect. 5. A minimum of four, 2A:10BC fire extinguishers shall be in the tent and available for immediate use. 6. No smoking shall be permitted inside the tent and signs shall be posted to that effect. 7. No vehicles shall be parked within 30 feet of the tent. FINANCE (336-4330) A Business License is required of all vendors and businesses participating in the special event. Each separate vendor must have a separate business license. Merchants licensed for the site can operate on their current license. City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE August 1, 2000 AGENDA ITEM NO. 23 7—ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — St. Mary's Parish Annual Fund Raising PREPARED BY Kathleen Trees, Director '+' EPARTMENT Building and Safety EXPLANATION This is a request from the St Mary's Parish to conduct their annual Fall Festival fund-raising event on the Parish grounds located at 8th St. & E Ave from 7:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday, October 8, 2000. The event will consist of food booths, game booths, art's & crafts booths and raffles. A waiver of fees is requested. In that the net income from the event will accrue only to St. Mary's Parish, the event does not qualify for a waiver of fees pursuant to City Council Policy No. 704. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The City has incurred $76.00 in processing this Temporary Use Permit Application. Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval, and deny the request for a waiver of fees. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended Conditions of Approval. A-200 (9/80) 001-3585-13000 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING & SAFETY 1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD., NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PE APPLICATION MUNICIPAL PAL CODE 5 HEREBY RB A AND DE FOR DESCRIBED TEMPORARY USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISION OF THE NATIONAL CIT Temporary Use Permits are ministerial administrative regulations intended to provide orderly and effective managementof specific list temporaryof I haveBuilding characteristics limitations. Any permit applicantmay appeal the action of the Ofcapursuant to Municipal Code section 15.60.045. Class A & B use Application for a Temporary Use Permit must be filed 15 working days prior to the commencement of the activity/event. Activities/events involving the use or areas of operation within the state highway jurisdiction shall be filed not less than six (6) month prior to the requested activity/event. PI EASE COMPLETE (Print or Type): �J SPONSORING ORGANIZATION(s)): S /�f11?y- / A€/'' ORGANIZATION ADDRESS: �� 6 G 74 mac' G' T /U/UA L C/Ty Gff y $1 PHONE 4•1%y /.5-0/ City f . State Zip LOCATION OF EVENT: ---4q4/5H �%gaw/g/U S ,,a)Cf17E" ✓/7 8 el 6 211G- DATES) REQUESTED FOR EVENT: FROM /6 /Woa TO /d/Y/ov HOURS OF USE ON DAY OF EVENT: FROM /JD A.M. / Pcia1- TO 6� �• / (BEGIN SETUP ) DATE %b/4//DUTIME%.:TU �D AM./P.M. — (END SEP DATE /0/,/d0TIME -/U P.M.A"JP.M. (BEGIN TEARDOWN) DATE ib/9fOD TIME 9 A.M. /( END TEARDOWN) DATE /6/9%U BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: ANNtI41. PAte.iSa{ Gc/ND 2///5/N6 - roo/J D2ia✓/; (•Ama- &sr/4s AO' C//EA1-/30o/rls/ 64)411c 6.3LG. Ay'linLI adD7EN>c/a741AM764//' Z (A brie summary of the event/ may be requested. A summary of the event activity may be attached to the application) NAME OF PERSON RESPONSIBLEFORTHE EVENT, WHO WILL BE ON -SITE THE DAY OF THE EVENT: .SAmtr:S A HOW MAY THIS PERSON BE CONTACTED?/MILL, ,AC-" Ai `rrdA/JL&,Qav-/ °� c og-'%f�> SPECIFIC USE REQUEST: 4/D 57CLOSG/J IC9,131-.g JUSTIFICATION: REQUEST TO SELL OR SERVE ALCOHOL BEVERAGES: YES[ ] NO[ ] — WILL FOOD/ DRINK BE SOLD: YES[ I (Note: The City Council will not approve the sale or consumption of alcohol in City parks in conjunction with any event requiring a T.U.P. This prohibition will not impact the existing policy regarding the sale or con consumptionthe of Coualcohciil)within buildings in the parks, such as the Community Center, which willilcontinue to be subject to the approvalY WILL TENTS OR CANOPIES BE USED?: YES [t'] NO [ ] (If "YES,", permit maybe required from Fire Department) WAIVER OF FEES REQUESTED: YES [ i/1 NO [ I (If "YES," complete attached supplemental questionnaire form) REQUEST ASSISTANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING: NOISE, CROWD, TRAFFIC CONTROL: &/LC A!d I///306 O � /� S4"64/P/7y SECURITY CONTROL: ed ILL /4i/IbG- C�L�•l/t/ FACILITIES: (When Applicable) PARKING/BARRICADES: /%A! AO SRGG'/zit ,4 /Sig 10€/i4 Lo/,; /4/, Z-724` EXTERIOR LIGHTING/ELECTRICAL: AC : a/ i,44 /SM 20 TRASH DISPOSAL/SITE CLEAN-UPnAFTER EVENT: ..n.,iT n ms, rn(`II ITICC- / /i)".€67/z JCS-- •/ / k/-S%/ //ti &' NO[ /14 ,64/LefeW05 q5/ S/6,) «-!JS a, 7f/6 PLEASE COMPLETE (Print or Type) NAME OF APPLICANT ._-' M'S ADDRESS: /.9 9 /9.e_a_viirc --‘7 6, fl4Pat' 4C 6Y7. C. PHONE: �.7 9„2i.75 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT! - DATE: 6/ / /3 (THIS FORM BE MES A PERMIT WHEN ENDORSED BY THE BUILDING & SAFETY DIRECTOR) (FOR OFFICE USE ONLY) PERMIT FEES: PERMIT NO.: USE GROUP: USE CLASS: BOND: PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: SPECIFIC STIPULATIONS / COMMENTS: (RECEIVED DATE STAMP) APPROVALS / STIPULATIONS (Check Where Applicable): PLANNING YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] FIRE YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] PUBLIC WORKS YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] FINANCE YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] POLICE YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ I PARKS & REC. YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] ENGINEERING YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] CITY ATTORNEY YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] RISK MANAGER YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] COMMUNITY DEVELOP. YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] OTHER YES [ ] NO [ ] SEE STIP [ ] Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: TEMPORARY USE PERMIT: APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] WAIVER OF FEES: APPROVED [ [ DENIED [ PROPERTY NOTIFICATION REQUIRED: YES [ ] NO [ ] COMMENTS: DATE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT AND RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: St Mary's Parish EVENT: Annual Parish Fund Raising DATE OF EVENT: Sunday, October 8, 2000 TIME OF EVENT: 7:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. APPROVALS: FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] POLICE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] (SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT HAS BEEN NOTIFIED) CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FIRE 336-4550 1. Fire department access must be maintained at all times. 2. All fire department connections must remain unblocked. FINANCE 336-4330 1. A business license is required if monies are solicited, admittance charged or food, beverages or merchandise is sold. Each separate vendor must have a separate business license. If the church is currently licensed, they may operate on that existing license. If there are other vendors or organizations participating and they are registered not -for -profit there will not be a charge for their business license. POLICE 336-4400 1. Police Department will attempt to provide 2 reserve police officers, 2 explorer scouts and 2 senior volunteers for the event. s,�1V7 -I-1d/v\ 1 St3 531d9 /nil N1(✓►_ry S d/aV?S JV11 7 91,07 ?a1 S atJ-N'r707 1'7 ,91 a3nU �ih r koi -("O 't , J_, —I.1V3WNfe1��1N3 -1( HSir,dds �h J � lft ci' .7)Qd'\J 57Nyiv1_1 City of National City Building & Safety Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA. 91950 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT FEE WAIVER REOUEST SUPPLEMENTAL OUESTIONNAIRE City Council Policy No. 704 contains the criteria for granting waivers of T.U.P. processing fees by the City Council. This Supplemental Questionnaire will be used to evaluate whether the event or sponsoring organization for a T.U.P. meet the criteria for a fee waiver. Accordingly, please answer all questions fully and completely. City Council Policy No. 704 The City Council shall waive T.U.P. processing fees only in the case of anon -profit organization, and when such organization can demonstrate that the event for which the T.U.P. is requested will not generate any income to the organization, or that the net proceeds of the event for which the T.U.P. is requested result in: 1. direct financial benefit to an individual who resides or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family; or 2. direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax; or 3. direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club; or 4. direct financial benefit to an organization which has been the direct recipient of City or Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding. PLEASE FULLY AND COMPLETELY ANSWER THE FOLLOWING: 1. Is the event for which the T.U.P. is sought sponsored by a non-profit organization? YES (If YES, please proceed to Question No. 4) NO (If NO, please sign the bottom of this form and submit this form with the T.U.P. Application to the Building & Safety Department) 2 If the answer to Question No. 1 was YES, please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the T.U.P. is sought and then proceed to Question No. 3. Name of Sponsoring Organization Type of Organization (Service Club, Church, Social Service Agency, etc.) 51. iiI4,e ys / fsN 3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds to the sponsoring organization? 1/YES (If YES, please proceed to Question No. 4) NO (If NO, please sign the bottom of this form and submit the with the T.U.P. Application to the Building & Safety Department) 4. If the answer to Question 3 is YES, will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided below) VNO (If NO, please proceed to Question No. 5) If YES, please explain who is to benefit from the proceeds and the general nature of the financial hardship: 5. Will the event provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided below) !/ NO (If NO, please proceed to Question No. 6) If YES, please explain how the direct financial benefit to the city will occur: Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided ' / below) v NO (If NO, please proceed to Question No. 7) If YES, please explain the organizations that are to benefit from the proceeds of the event and how the proceeds will be used by those organizations. 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization which has been the direct recipient of City of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? YES (If YES, please provide explanation and details in space provided below) f// NO (If NO, please sign the bottom of this form and submit the with the T.U.P. Application to the Building & Safety Department) If YES, please state the year the City of Community Develop Block Grant (CDBG) funds were received and how those funds were used: Year funds were received. Funds were used to SIf iATUItE COG/ /'/ DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT August 1, 2000 MEETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 24 r ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT -CIRCUIT CITY STORES SOUND COMPETITION PREPARED BYKathleen Trees, Director EXPLANATION Building and Safety This is a request from Circuit City to conduct a one day sound competition to be held in Circuit City's parking lot, August 6, 2000. The hours of the competition are 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. During the competition, two cars at a time will compete against each other. A microphone is placed in each car and the windows are closed to seal the car. The sound is then electronically metered for judging. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The City has incurred $150.00 in costs in processing the T.U.P. application through various City Departments. N/A Account Flo. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended conditions of approval c/A200.DOC A-200 (9/80) City of National City Building & Safety Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 Application For A Temporary Use Permit Application is hereby made for a temporary use permit pursuant to the provision of the National City Municipal Code 15.60 and as described below. Temporary Use Permits (TUP) are ministerial administrative regulations intended to provide orderly and effective management of specific list of temporary land uses having exceptional characteristics requiring their review and limitations. Any permit applicant may appeal the action of the Building Official pursuant to Municipal Code section 15.60.045. Class A & B use Application for a Temporary use permit must be filed 15 working days prior to the commencement of the activity/event. Activities/events involving the use or areas of operation within the state highway jurisdiction shall be filed not less than six (6) months prior to the requested activity/event. Please Complete: (Print or Type) Sponsoring Organization(s): e Ircut-1 Ct E Sf:ore5f 1aJc. Organization Address: 16 as �.‘, zefwakec City: Mrn.Jto004 C.1 E y• State: a Zip: r%/9 5d Phone: (6 � L( 7'i - R3 °'. x. Location of Event: (4tr8,,,,Aty(,,,e„l-csRJ Nai(nnvi t'dd I by , C.41 1 i $52) n Fr, ,0, Rxvk,r I -err Dates(s) Requested for Event: Au e LI s t 62.0 D Hours of Use on Day of Event: Froth: /o : ob M To: 3,, ge) A it) First Day: Setup - Date: g 67sb Time: 7.c (t 'M Teardown — Date: gi,672�2),D Time: o'iia Last Day: Setup — Date: „y 6 / 0-in Time: 7-7 4 ' M Teardown — Date: 7/41 -zTime: .4.iiP Brief Description of Event (A summary of the event may be attached to the application): / 111 ts t 5 a, 'Sv iiv,.0 (ic?n e.t (LIiv, l'At oe-er) OL"f) t SCca.4 t',i/e-Aa (/.e, ti Name of Person Responsible For'The Event Who Will Be On -Site The Day Of The Event:'" A aey 1.1 , rr`,, How May This Person Be Contacted? f 19 t l77 ,g32 v. �xt ``- -- _ Specific Specific Use Request: Ifeti‘cle �r)uluo riimpr,i,A>a,n to he. het 0 ;;Kruif eiiy.2r A kiv,q 1r Justification: t Request to Sell or Serve Alcohol Beverages: Yes [ ] No [}<] Will Food/Drinks Be Sold: Yes [ ] No ] Note: The City Council will not approve the sale or consumption of alcohol in City parks in conjunction with any event requiring a TUP. Th s prohibition will not impact the existing policy regarding the sale or consumption of alcohol within buildings in the parks, such as the Community Center, which will continue to be subject to the approval of the City Council. Will Tents or Canopies be Used?: Yes <] No [ ] If "Yes," permit may be required from Fire Department CSmv I I2_Kt — Ca, Oar +to Waiver of Fees Requested: Yes [ ] No [X] If "Yes," complete attached supplemental questionnaire form Facilities (When Applicable — Request Assistance with the Following) Noise, Crowd, Traffic Control: ,,t„)�n Security Control: .4.-o,,Ue Parking/Barricades: ,,tJGjJe Exterior Lighting/Electrical: ,,tee Trash Disposal/Site Clean-up After Event: />cv,,,,& Sanitary Facilities: i e Name of Applicgt ,,Z.1, ,, ei, ji ) 6-, „,i { (? {- 56,,rc s 7n,C Address: /G�c r --��� �iLi .� C� `,/ar,� Phone: (G/i) y7'7 F13�e%e .� T Signature of Applicant: -- .sy / ' Date: This Form Becomes A Permit When Endorsed By The Building & Safety Director (over) For Office Use Only Permit Fees: Permit No: Use Group: Use Class: Bond: Permit Exp.Date: Specific Stipulations/Comments: Approvals/Stipulations (Check where Applicable): Initial Date PLANNING Yes [ FIRE Yes [ PUBLIC WORKS Yes [ FINANCE Yes [ POLICE Yes [ PARKS & REC. Yes [ ENGINEERING Yes [ CITY ATTORNEY Yes [ RISK MANAGER Yes [ COMMUNITY DEV. Yes [ OTHER Yes [ ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] No [ ] No [ I No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] No [ ] See STIP [ See STEP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ See STIP [ ] J.- I ] ] ] ] ] ] ] Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date City Council Meeting Date: Temporary Use Permit: Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Waiver of Fees: Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Property Notification Required: Yes [ ] No [ ] Comments: Date: CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED Conditions of Approval SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: Circuit City Stores EVENT: Sound competition DATE OF EVENT: August 6, 2000 TIME: 7:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. APPROVALS: PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x POLICE YES [ x 1 NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x 1 Conditions of Approval: FIRE (336-4550) 1. Fire department access must be maintained at all times. 2. All fire department connections must remain unblocked. FINANCE (336-4330) A Business License is required of all vendors and businesses participating in the special event. Each separate vendor must have a separate business license. Merchants licensed for the site can operate on their current license. POLICE (336-4400) It is recommended that private security be hired for this event, three to four security officers should be on site.