Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001 02-27 CC AGENDA PKTAGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING NATIONAL CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2001 - 6:00 P.M. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY THE CITY MANAGER, TOM G. MC CABE INVOCATION APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF FEBRUARY 13, 2001 AND FEBRUARY 20, 2001. COUNCIL AGENDA 02/27/01 Page 2 PROCLAMATION Proclaiming the month of March 2001 to be: "MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH" INTERVIEWS/APPOINTMENTS City Boards and Commissions - Interview PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing — Planned Development Permit for a 93-unit extended stay hotel at the northwest corner of Plaza Boulevard and Interstate 805 with a code amendment to allow kitchenette facilities and stays longer than 30 days and to eliminate the requirement for a manager's unit. (Applicant: Extended Stay America) (Case File No.: PD-2000-9, A-2000-2) (Planning) 2. Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit to allow a church at 1540 E. 18th Street. (Applicant: Jose C. Soriano, Sr.) (Case File No.: CUP-1999-6) (Planning) 3. Public Hearing — Proposed vacation of a portion of 7th Street west of Roosevelt Avenue and the adjacent alley. (Applicant: Community Development Commission) (Case File No.: SC-2001-1) (Planning) CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent Calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. COUNCIL AGENDA 02/27/01 Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 4. Resolution No. 2001-25 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Engineer to establish angle parking on Third Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue on the north side. (City Engineer) 5. WARRANT REGISTER #34 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $362,458.20. 6. Consolidated Cash and Investment Report as of September 30, 2000. (Finance) 7. Claim for Damages: Joceill Cheek (City Clerk) 8. Claim for Damages: Simone Johnson (City Clerk) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 9. Letter from the Chamber of Commerce requesting a waiver of fees for the use of the Community Building for a workshop on the energy crisis for business owners on Thursday, April 26, 2001 from 5:30 to 7:30 p.m. NEW BUSINESS 10. Compensation Adjustment — City Clerk (City Manager) 11. Report on Code regulations affecting CDC relocation of VFW. (Planning) COUNCIL AGENDA 02/27/01 Page 4 NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) -* CITY MANAGER -* CITY ATTORNEY —* OTHER STAFF —> MAYOR -* CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. CLOSED SESSION Conference with Legal Counsel — Existing Litigation Government Code Section 54956.9(a) 1. Duck Pond — Regional Water Quality Control Board Cleanup and Abatement Order No. 95-66 COUNCIL AGENDA 02/27/01 Page 5 CLOSED SESSION (Cont.) 2. Shawn Lee, et al. v. City of National City United States District Court Case No. 98 CV 1292 BTM LSP 3. Gerardo Gutierrez, et al. v. City of National City Superior Court Case No. GIS 749219 4. James Morant v. City of National City, et. al Superior Court Case File No. GIC 752884 5. Daniel Weaver v. City of National City Superior Court Case No. GIC 753516 6. Fay Alvarado Bloom v. City of National City Superior Court Case No. GIC 756952 7. Linda Kaye Harter v. City of National City Court of Appeal, Fourth District Case File No. DO35563 8. Viviane Eliq v. City of National City United States District Court Case No. 00 CV 2106 K (NLS) 9. Arturo A. Gonzalez and Maria D. Gonzalez v. City of National City Superior Court Case No. GIS 4641 10. Claims of a) Gabriela Bolanos, b) Desiree Meyer, c) Sylvester A. Washington, d) Preston A. Whyte ADJOURNMENT Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of National City and the Community Development Commission of National City — March 6, 2001 at 1:00 p.m. — Large Conference Room, Civic Center. Next Regular City Council Meeting — March 6, 2001 at 3:00 p.m. - Council Chambers, Civic Center. TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE • 6 rnrittmttfton WHEREAS, Mental retardation is a condition which today affects an estimated 1,700 National City children and adults and their families; and WHEREAS, The most effective weapons for alleviation of the serious problems associated with mental retardation are public knowledge and understanding; and WHEREAS, The potential for citizens with mental retardation to function more independently and productively must be fostered; and WHEREAS, During the month of March, 140,000 members through 1,000 state and local chapters of The Arc, a national organization on mental retardation, are forging vital employment and educational campaigns; and WHEREAS, The Arc of San Diego is celebrating 50 years of service to families and individuals who live, lean, work and play throughout San Diego County. NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE H. WATERS, Mayor of the City of National City, do hereby proclaim the month of March 2001 to be: "MENTAL RETARDATION AWARENESS MONTH" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of National City to be affixed this 27th day of February, 2001. Geor Waters, ayor Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor February 20, 2001 Ms. Maria Dalla 2502 K Avenue National City, CA 91950 Dear Ms. Dalla: This letter is to notify you that in order to be considered for appointment to one of our City's Boards and Commissions, you are required by City policy to appear before the City Council for an interview. You are, therefore, requested to appear for consideration for appointment at our Council meeting on Tuesday, February 27; 2001 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. If you are unable to attend, please contact my office immediately. Your prompt attention to this matter is greatly appreciated. Sincerely, GEOR'GE H. WATERS MAYOR GHW:nu ® Recycled Paper CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PURPOSE AND INTENT: It is the purpose and intent of this form to provide the City Council with as much background information as possible on those persons willing to serve on any of the Boards and Commissions of the City of National City. Please note: This application will be kept on file and under consideration for one (1) year from the date it is submitted. PLEASE CHECK THE BOARD OR COMMISSION FOR WHICH YOU ARE APPLYING (You May Apply for More than One) Building Advisory & Appeals Board Civil Service Commission Planning---�— Port Commission Commission Senior Citizens Advisory Board Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Serra Library Systems Board Street Tree & Parkway Committee Project Area Committee Student Commissioner Name: -Oa_ /La - (Last) Traffic Safety Committee Library Board of Trustees Sweetwater Authority San Diego County Water Authority _ Housing & Community Development Committee Mar Birth Date (First) (Optional) Home Address: c SCa. k ziIFJ7U2_ Telephone: Residence ( 3 3 y? 7 _ 9 yy / ) Business/Work ( 3 3(, - 77a1 ) NUMBER OF YEARS YOU HAVE LIVED IN: CALIFORNIA? SAN DIEGO COUNTY? q "/ y rS NATIONAL CITY? ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER: YES 1-/ NO ���r�4iY!_"Tei� Rl!- �wns-f. L4l�Y •bi:::: SiF..,L�..v. ay._: .L .mot?',nih. i.f'h:v'k�h'�.}l 4; 4...v. .l.": -::..:..%: .:F.+:::-.v;ifir.:!}^;:""k"�:' Ovi}.:v: y}T:tingmg.::.,:cv:.U:.:;,::n•. --: _ Colleges attended and degrees held, jf �-h we any: Sovs- h Co ll/y P. ay d'a �! ISi'e G n S�rc eUrrerlf(yy 11��rsv�'n a- cle rWe. ,n villa', /-sec,, aycker: 4V ',I��feL.1/vets0 , Related Profestionai or chi* • rr 2�� o//, Experience: WU,yl,fil Remyjrrols ' }.4,..-1 ev-v, i , Sr ./-7n n / / r ii--. vp . k5 /Cta r /P Y H%P G 7n via q. eA' PLEASE INDICATE BELOW ANY FURTHER INFORMATION THAT WILL BE OF VALUE REGARDING YOUR SERVICE ON THE ABOVE NAMED BOARDS, COMMITTEES OR COMMISSIONS: DATE:�vjagjeLL YOUR SIGNATURE RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO: THE CITY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL CITY 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD, NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 / ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING — PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A 93-UNIT EXTENDED STAY HOTEL AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PLAZA BOULEVARD AND INTERSTATE 805 WITH A CODE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW KITCHENETTE FACILITES AND STAYS LONGER THAN 30 DAYS AND TO ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT FOR A MANAGER'S UNIT. (APPLICANT: EXTENDED STAY AMERICA) (C4 F ri D-2000-9, A-2000-2) DEPARTMENT Jon Cain - Associate Planner-, Planning EXPLANATION The Council set this item for hearing at the January 16 meeting. The attached background report describes the proposal in detail. Expanded public notice was provided as requested by Council. C. Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A N/A Negative Declaration proposed (IS-2000-8) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approved By: Finance Director Staff recommends that the Planned Development Permit be approved and that the Code be amended. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to deny the Planned Development Permit and recommend denial of the Code amendment. ote• Ayes — i Jnanimous ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Background Report 2. Planning Commission Res. with Denial Findings 3. Location Map 4. Findings for Approval/Denial 9 t1111u PP al 6. Proposed Code Amendment 7. Department and Agency Comments 8. Applicant's Market Study 9. Applicant's Letter Resolution No. 11. Staff Survey Summary 12.Initial Study 13. Applications 14.Perspective Drawings 15.Applicanl s Plans .I.1 1=11 BACKGROUND REPORT The applicant, Extended Stay America, proposes to construct a four-story, 93-unit extended stay hotel (efficiency studios) in the General Commercial zone. An amendment to hotel/motel Code standards is also proposed to allow kitchenette facilities in the guestrooms, to eliminate the requirement for an on -site manager's unit, and to allow stays longer than 30 days. The proposed facility would be located on a 1.94-acre site at the northwest corner of Plaza Boulevard and Interstate 805, a primary entrance to the City. The property fronts on both Plaza Boulevard and E. 12th Street, and slopes downward approximately 20 feet from 12th to Plaza. Adjacent uses include single- family homes and a church across the street to the north, commercial uses across Plaza Boulevard to the south, a restaurant and apartments to the west, and Interstate 805 to the east. Most of the project site has been vacant for some time. Extended Stay America is a national chain with 383 other locations. They do not franchise their properties. This type of use is a hybrid, having some characteristics of a hotel and some characteristics of an apartment complex. Extended stay facilities cater to people who will be working or doing business in an area for a week or weeks at a time, while still offering nightly rates to tourists and others. Expected clientele for this project include employees of various occupations such as construction trades, professional/technical and sales. The attached market report prepared by the applicant describes nearby employers that would potentially generate clients for the facility, including BF Goodrich Aerospace, National Steel and Shipbuilding, the Navy, Otay Mesa Foreign Trade Zone, and others. Application materials indicate that the company has an average stay of 17 days at its facilities nationwide. The building exterior will be stucco, with a concrete tile, hipped roof. The facility will have its only vehicular and pedestrian access from Plaza Boulevard. The proposal complies with Design Guidelines and all Code requirements except those regarding motel standards mentioned above. There will be no access to 12th Street from the development. No traffic impacts are expected from the development, as explained in the attached Initial Study and Engineering Department comments. The rooms, described as "efficiency studios", would range from 318 to 453 square feet in size and contain an approximately 50 square foot kitchenette with a microwave, two -burner stove, and refrigerator. Pots, pans and silverware would be provided. No on -site manager's unit is proposed, and stays longer than 30 days are also proposed. The minimum size for a hotel room is 300 square feet, whereas a studio apartment unit has a 500 square foot minimum. Allowing stays longer than 30 days and allowing kitchenette facilities introduces the potential for the project to function as an apartment. In the past, the City has experienced police and property maintenance problems with other hotels/motels which allowed lengthy stays, such as the Ha' Penny Inn. Future economic conditions, as well as the management of the facility could lead to gradual changes, such as longer stays in some units. Hotel rooms sometimes evolve into low-cost, temporary housing units as hotel vacancies and the demand for inexpensive housing increase. Recent socioeconomic trends also suggest other possible uses, such as a care facility. Since the applicant is a large corporation with over 380 facilities nationwide, it can be expected that there will be strong management and that the project will initially operate as an extended stay hotel rather than an apartment complex. However, it has been common for hotels to change hands in hard economic times or if the owner considers it an underperforming asset. There is the potential for a different hotel operator with weaker management practices to take over the property in the future. The proposed Code changes would create a separate category for extended stay facilities to distinguish them from traditional hotels/motels. In order to help prevent extended stay facilities from functioning as apartments without City review, the proposed Code changes would require that housekeeping services be provided and would prohibit the leasing of rooms. Attached is a brief summary of regulations in other jurisdictions. Some of the cities have no specific regulations, while some prohibit stays longer than 30 days. Other Code changes could also be considered. For example, Council raised the question of whether swimming pool requirements should be considered when reviewing the Microtel project approved at 76 and Roosevelt. The Planning Commission considered this but made no recommendation. Since the applicant has not requested an amendment to the Local Coastal Plan (LCP), the proposed Code Amendment, if adopted, would not affect regulations in the Coastal Zone. Existing Code standards will remain in place for the Coastal Zone unless an LCP amendment is initiated and approved. At the Planning Commission hearing for the project, seven citizens spoke in opposition to the development. They expressed concern regarding potential traffic impacts, the lack of on site management, the length of stays, the overabundance of hotels/motels in the area, the need to protect the adjacent residential neighborhood, ingress/egress, and the potential for the property to be used as an apartment complex. Letters from concerned citizens are attached. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to deny the Planned Development and recommend denial of the Code amendment, reflecting citizen concerns. The applicant's letter in response to concerns raised at the public hearing is attached. Findings for denial of the Planned Development permit are included in the attached Planning Commission resolution. Possible fmdings and conditions of approval for the Planned Development Permit and Code amendment are also attached. In summary, both nearby residents as well as the Planning Commission expressed concern over the potential of this project to have a negative effect on the community. These concerns are very real, and could occur as a result of poor management. Extended Stay America, however, is a strong national company with a track record of keeping their properties maintained at a high level. The extensive conditions of approval on the project as well as Code provisions requiring approval of any change of use provide additional protection. RESOLUTION NO.05-2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A 93-UNIT EXTENDED STAY HOTEL AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PLAZA BOULEVARD AND INTERSTATE 805. APPLICANT: MATT O'SHEA FOR ESA SERVICES, INC. CASE FILE NO. PD-2000-9. WHEREAS, the Planning commission of the City of National City, California considered a planned development permit application and proposed Negative Declaration for a 93-unit extended stay hotel at the northwest corner of Plaza Boulevard and Interstate 805 at the public hearing held on December 18, 2000, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File Nos. PD-2000-9 and IS-2000-8, maintained by the City, and incorporated herein by reference; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on December 18, 2000 fail to support fmdings, required by the Municipal Code for granting any planned development permit, that the proposed use will not have an adverse effect on adjacent or abutting properties, and that the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or welfare. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on December 18, 2000 support the following findings: 1. That the proposed use will have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the rooms have the potential to be used as small, long-term studio apartments without the necessary parking and open space for such use, and since the project will not include the required on -site manager's unit to ensure users of the facility do not disrupt adjacent properties. 2. That the proposed use is not deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, as reflected in the Land Use Code, which requires a manager's unit and prohibits hotel stays longer than 30 days and kitchenette facilities in hotels, and the Planning Commission considered but recommended against Code amendments to delete the requirement for a manager's unit and allow kitchen facilities and unlimited stays. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby denies Planned Development Permit application no. PD-2000-9. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council; and, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of January 8, 2001 by the following vote: AYES: VALDERRAMA, PARRA, GODSHALK, UNGAB, BACA, MARTINELLI, DETZER. NAYS: . ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ,s2)c PROJECT LOCATION ♦ ♦ ♦ • • • RS-3-PD ZONE BOUNDARY LOCATION MAP NW corner Plaza Blvd and 1-805 PD-2000-9/A-2000-2/IS-2000-8 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING CT- DRN. DATE: 12/6/00 INITIAL HEARING: 12/18/00 FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 1. Find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and adopt the proposed negative declaration. 2. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the lot has sufficient area to accommodate the proposed hotel with the required parking and amenities. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the project involves the construction of a 4-story hotel with access from Plaza Boulevard, an arterial street with the capacity to serve the traffic generated. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the project will comply with Design Guidelines and will be compatible with the scale and character of the neighborhood, and since the property will include sufficient landscaping to screen the use from residences to the north across 12th Street. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the project will provide opportunities for hotel occupancy in the Motel -Planned Development Combining Zone area, designed to allow for the development of this type of use, and market information shows the need for extended stays by businesses and labor in the area. In addition, the proposal will provide a freeway -oriented business on vacant property at a primary entrance to the City from I-805. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE CODE AMENDMENT 1. That the Code amendment is consistent with the General Plan, since it would allow extended stay hotels, a use providing support for other professional activities; since the use would be required to be appropriately sited in a Commercial zone and the Motel Planned Development overlay district; and since the use would create opportunities for tax generation. FINDINGS FOR DENIAL OF THE CODE AMENDMENT 1. That the Code amendment is not consistent with the General Plan, since it would create the potential for long-term housing inappropriate for the large family sizes present in the City. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. This Planned Development Permit authorizes the construction of an extended stay hotel with rooms to be rented at daily or weekly rates. All plans submitted for permits associated with development of the facility shall conform with Exhibit A -Revised, case file no. PD-2000-9/A-2000-2, dated 11/1/2000, except as modified by conditions of approval. 2. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Codes and the California Title 24 energy and handicapped regulations. 3. A Hydrology study (100 year flood) shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer. The study will consider form the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection pipe inlet. The study shall consider the adequacy of the existing drain system to convey any additional runoff. All Hydrology study findings and recommendations shall be part of Engineering Department requirements. 4. A grading plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed development shall be implemented with the design of the grading plan. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with NPDES regulations. A checklist for preparation of the grading and drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department. 5. A drainage plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared by a Regis- tered Civil Engineer or other qualified professional, and shall be in accordance with City require- ments. b. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The report shall address the stability of all existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maxi- mum allowable soil bearing pressure, and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking area* and the driveways. At a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2-inch A.C. over 4-inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 with National City modifications. All soils report findings shall be part of the Engineering Department requirements. 7. A sewer permit from the City Engineer will be required. The method of sewage collection and dis- posal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be six inches in size with a clean -out, unless approved otherwise. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 8. The approximately 20-foot length of deteriorated sidewalk along the property frontage shall be re- moved and replaced as specified by the City Engineer. 9. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engi- neer after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the National City Engineering Depart- ment. 10. The driveway on Plaza Boulevard shall be an alley -type driveway with pedestrian ramps. 11. A permit shall be. obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and for grading construction on private property. 12. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, and landscaping work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an ini- tial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. 13. Street improvements shall be in accordance with City standards. The approximately 60 feet of missing sidewalk street improvements shall be constructed. Abandoned driveway aprons on 12th Street shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. 14. A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for a review of all existing ease- ments and the ownership at the property. 15. The property owner shall submit a letter to the Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the Authority for any water facility improvements required for the proposed project. 16. Before this Planned Development Permit and Zone Variance shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit and Zone Variance. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Planned Development Permit and Zone Variance are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 17. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 18. A trash enclosure shall be provided in accordance with city standards. It shall have an exterior finish to match the building. 19. Exterior walls of buildings/ freestanding signs/ trash enclosures to a height of not less than 6 feet shall be treated with "Graffiti Melt Coating" manufactured by Genesis Coatings, Inc. A similar product may be used, subject to approval from the Building and Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its observance. 20. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan, including plant types, methods of planting, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant planting and water conserving irrigation devices. 21. The fence around the swimming pool shall be landscaped with vines to provide complete coverage of the fence to screen the pool. Landscape plans shall indicate the type of vines proposed. 22. Housekeeping services including cleaning and linen service shall be provided to every guest room. 23. Hotel staff shall be present on the site at all times; contact information shall be available to reach staff 24. Leases of any duration are prohibited. PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT A. Add the following definition for extended stay hotels/motels: 18.04.237 Extended Stay Hotel/Motel. "Extended Stay Hotel/Motel" means a type of hotel or motel with guest rooms rented out as temporary accommodations for travelers or transients with no limit on the length of stay. An extended stay facility contains guest rooms with kitchen or kitchenette facilities and is designed for temporary occupancy. See also "Hotel" 18.04.326, "Motel" 18.04.434, and 18.16.192. B. Amend the hotel definition as follows: 18.04.326 Hotel. "Hotel" means any building or portion of any building with access provided through a common entrance, lobby or hallway to six or more guest rooms, having no cooking facilities, and which rooms are designed, intended to be uses, or are used, rented or hired out as temporary or over- night accommodations for transient guests. See also "Extended Stay Hotel/Motel" 18.04.237 and the regulations of 18.16.192. C. Amend the motel definition as follows: 18.04.434 Motel. "Motel" means a building or group of buildings containing individual sleeping or living units designed or used temporarily by tourists or transients traveling by automobile, with the garage attached-er parking spaces conveniently located to each unit, commonly referred to as auto seuFtsr . Otherwise "motel" means the same as "hotel" (Section 18.04.326). See also "Extended Stay Hotel/Motel" 18.04.237 and the regulations of 18.16.192. D. Amend the hotel/motel regulations to clarify requirements and specify requirements for ex- tended stay hotels/motels as follows: 18.16.192 Hotels, Motels, and Extended Stay Hotels/Motels. A. A t f tI tr efiie pe a of e m otel a nhatt pt,. witl ir ¥The following standards apply to the construction or expansion of any hotel, motel, of extended stay hotel/motel in any zone: 1. All hotels/motels except extended stay hotels/motels shall have a manager's apartment. 2. Kitchen or kitchenette facilities are prohibited in all but the resident manager's unit, except in extended stay hotels/motels. 3. All hotels/motels shall be located on lots that are at least twenty thousand square feet in size and the minimum number of units provided shall be twenty. 4. Metel-rooms shall be at least three hundred square feet in size including the bath- room. 5. A swimming pool at least five hundred twenty-five square feet in size shall be provided on all site:,. 6. On -site parking of a ratio of one space for each room shall be provided per Sec tion 18.58.210. In addition, there will be one extra parking space for every ten units up to fifty. Over fifty units, one extra parking space shall be provided for every twenty units. 7. Landscaped areas shall be provided per Section 18.16.390. 8. Hotels. Motels, and extended stay hotels/motels shall be permitted only on prop- erty bearing the symbol "MPD" on the zoning map per Chapter 18.43. (Ord. 1805 (part), 1983). 9. Stays longer than 30 days shall be prohibited, except in extended stay ho- tels/motels. B. The following additional standards apply to the construction or expansion of any ex- tended stay hotel or motel in any zone: 1. Kitchen or kitchenette facilities are required in each guest room. 2. Housekeeping services including cleaning and linen service shall be provided. 3. Leasing of guest rooms is prohibited. E. Clarify parking requirements in the Land Use Code by removing hotels and motels from the residential use listing for parking and adding the correct parking requirements to the commercial parking requirements as follows: 18.58.240 Schedule of parking requirements -- Residential uses. The following is the schedule of off-street parking requirements for residential uses: Structures and Uses Off -Street Parking Required Hotel Motel 18.58.290 Schedule of parking requirements -- Business and commercial uses. The following is the schedule of off-street parking requirements for business and commercial uses: Structures and Uses Hotels and Motels Off -Street Parking Required 1 space per guest room plus one extra parking space for every ten units up to fifty. Over fifty units, one extra parking space shall be pro- vided for every twenty units. F. Add Extended Stay Hotel/Motel to Use Group 21 (Hotel, Motel, and Related Services) of Land Use Code Appendix A. (Note that Extended Stay Hotels/Motels will not be permitted in the Coastal Zone). City of National City Office of the City Engineer 1243 National City Blvd., National City, California 91950-4397 (619) 336-4380 February 15, 2001 To: Jon Cain, Associate Planner From: Adam Landa, Assistantta�n�Engineer Via: Stephen Kirkpatricl,'Pnncipal Civil Engineer Subject: Extended Stay America Proposal In response to your memo dated January 22, 2001, the proposed hotel will be served by an existing driveway that previously served a Wendy's Restaurant and a single-family residences. The Engineering Department will require that the existing driveway be enlarged as a condition of approval. With respect to the question regarding the safety of a left -turn on to Plaza Boulevard, left turns use an existing left -turn pocket and accidents have not been an issue in the past. The issue of traffic impacts cannot be determined without a traffic impact study being prepared. However the proposed use would not likely generate as much traffic as the fast food restaurant that was previously on the site. AL/mla ® Recycled Paper City of National City Office of the City Engineer 1243 National City Blvd., National City, California 91950-4397 (619) 336-4380 October 6, 2000 Pf ANNIIV, %DLPAIRT1 SENT lv, "°'?l!fl ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REVIEW OF A NEW 95 ROOM HOTEL AT THE 1800 BLOCK OF PLAZA BOULEVARD To: Roger G. Post, Director of Planning Department From: Adam J. Landa, Engineering Department 5#4- Via: Stephen M. Kirkpatrick, Principal Civil Engineer Subject: NEW 95 ROOM HOTEL AT THE 1800 BLOCK OF PLAZA BOULEVARD 1. A Hydrology study (100 year flood) shall be submitted. The study will consider from the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection pipe inlet. The study shall consider the adequacy of the existing drain system to convey any additional run off. All Hydrology study findings and recommendations shall be part of Engineering Department requirements (Ordinance 99-2164). 2. A grading plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site and off - site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution, and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading plan. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring , and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A checklist for preparation of the grading and drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department (Appendix Chapter 33 C.B.C. and Ordinance 99- 2164). 3. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 with National City modifications (Ordinance 99-2164). All soils report findings and recommendations shall be part of the Engineering Department requirements. ® Recycled Paper Planning Department October 6, 2000 Page 2 4. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean -out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral (Ordinance 1489; 92-2033; 93-2052). 5. The deteriorated sidewalk (20') along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced (Ordinance 1473, 1491, 1734,1927, 19.54, 92-2033). 6. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the National City Engineering Department (Ordinance 99-2164). 7. The driveway on Plaza Boulevards shall be an alley entrance type driveway with pedestrian ramps (Ordinance 99-2164). 8. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the Public Right -of -Way, and the grading construction on private property (Ordinance 1473, 1491, 1734, 1927, 1954, 92-2033). 9. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvement, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3 %) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment (Ordinance 99-2164, 1473, 1491, 1734, 1927, 1954, 92-2033). 10. Street improvements shall be in accordance with the City Standards. All missing street improvements (approximately 60' of sidewalk) shall be constructed. Abandoned driveways aprons (on 12th Street) shall be replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalks (Ordinance 1473, 1491, 1734, 1927, 1957, 92-2033and 99-2164). 11. A title report shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for a review of all existing easements and the ownership at the property (Ordinance 99-2164). AJL:jha2 95room City of National City NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPATfTMi iv i Building and Safety Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950-4397 (619) 336-4210 Fax (619) 336-4217 October 16, 2000 TO: Planning Department FROM: Kathleen Trees Building & Safety Department SUBJECT: Extended StayAmerica Hotel, I805 & Plaza Blvd. Plans must comply with the 1998 editions of the California Building Code, the California Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Electrical Code, and California Title 24 energy and handicapped regulations. i.• Recycled Paper SWEETWATER AUTHORITY 505 GARRETT AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91912-2328 (619) 420-1413 FAX (619) 425-7469 http://www.sweetwatecorg NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 00 October 20, 2000 Mr. Jon Cain, Associate Planner City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY - EXTENDED STAY HOTEL, 12TH AND PLAZA BLVD. CASE NO.: PD-2000-9, Z-2000-7, A-2000-2, IS-2000-8 SWA Gen. File: Water Availability, 2000 Dear Mr. Cain: GOVERNING BOARD MARGARET COOK WELSH, CHAIR JAMES'JIM' DOUD, VICE CHAIR SUE JARRETT BUD POCKLINGTON GEORGE H. WATERS J.S. SKI WOLNIEWICZ CARY F. WRIGHT WANDA AVERY TREASURER MARISA FARPOON•FRIEDMAN SECRETARY This letter is in response to a notice of an Application for Planned Development Permit and Zone Variance for the subject property within the Sweetwater Authority service area. There is a six-inch water main located on the north side of 12th Avenue and an eight -inch main on the north side of Plaza Blvd. (that ends before the two easterly lots) adjacent to the proposed development. The Authority's records indicate that there are three water services in the project area. Enclosed is a copy of 1/4 SEC. 129 map, which shows the water facilities. At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide fire protection for this project. As plans develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements. Based on this requirement, this project may result in the need for new water systems or substantial alteration to the existing water system. The Authority recommends that your Agency work with ours to determine if the existing water facilities are adequate to meet the added demands prior to issuing a building permit. Please note that Sweetwater Authority requires a ten -foot horizontal separation between sewer and water laterals. A Public Water Agency Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas Mr. Jon Cain City of National City Planning Dept. Re: CASE NO.: PD-2000-9, Z-2000-7, A-2000-2, IS-2000-8 If the Owner provides the required fire flow information and enters into an agreement with the Authority for water facility improvements, if required, water service can be obtained at a pressure ranging from a maximum of 75 p.s.i. to a minimum of 65 p.s.i. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Russell Collins at 422-8395, ext. 639. Very truly yours, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY es L. Smyth hief Engineer JLS:LJE enclosure: photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 132 map pc: ESA Services, Inc. Mr. Matt O'Shea 2525 Cherry Ave. #310 Signal Hill, CA 90806-2037 I:\engpool\Laurie\Wtravail\Extended Stay 12th & Plaza.doc EXTENDED STAYAMERICA. October 19, 2000 Jon Cain Associate Planner City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd. National City, Calif. 91950 Re: PD-2000-9, Z-2000-7, A-2000-2, IS-2000-8 Dear Jon: Please find attached a market summary supporting the need for extended stay facilities in the National City area. This is in response to Item #12 of your letter dated October 13, 2000 reviewing the above referenced project. Thanks for your help. StudioPLUS Deluxe Studios. EXTENDED STAYAMERICA EFFICIENCY STUDIOS. .!CP.v�i 51L.:pi ESA Services, Inc. / 16935 West Bernardo Drive / San Diego, California 92127 / P 858-613-1477 / F 858-613-1495 Positives: The proposed National City, CA E,s recommended for the following rea ': 1) The site is located within a trade area with several large demand generators and a dense population base; 2) The submarket is currently under supplied with hotel rooms; 3) Nearby existing ESA hotels have performed historically well; 4) The site has excellent visibility and access from a major freeway. The proposed site is located at the intersection of I-805 and Plaza Blvd. within the San Diego South Bay market. The South Bay market is made up of the communities of National City, Chula Vista, and Otay Mesa located between downtown San Diego and the Mexican border. Within five miles of the site there are 500,000 people and 160,000 jobs. It is expected that extended stay demand will be generated from a diverse selection of economic drivers, including: 1) Manufacturing — BF Goodrich Aerospace and National Steel & Shipbuilding plant; 2) International Trade — Otay Mesa Foreign Trade Zone and the "Maquiladoras;" 3) Military —Tile Naval Air Station and Naval Repair Facilities; 4) Residential — The 32,000 single family homes under development at Otay Ranch; 5) Other — The US Olympic Training Facility. The San Diego area's strong economy has been a boon to the local hotel industry. Within the proposed ESA's trade area (The I-805 corridor in National City and Chula Vista) there are five mid -market hotels representing 518 rooms. Coupled with no new additions to supply since 1990, these hotels have performed historically well: Year Occupancy ADR REVPAR % Chg. 1997 72% $50 n/a 1998 72% $54 7.4% 1999 74% $56 7.4% Of the 16 hotels in the South Bay market, four offer special weekly rates (Holiday Inn Express, Holiday Inn, Best Western, and The Traveler Inn & Suites). The weekly rates at these hotels range from $355 to $415, at least $35 above what the proposed ESA will need to charge to achieve the required return. The recently opened (11/26/99) ESA in Mission Valley is five miles northwest of the site along Interstate 8. It has 166 rooms and is currently charging a weekly rate of $389 per week. The proposed site is located at the intersection of1-805 and Plaza Blvd. The proposed four story hotel will be clearly visible from both directions along I-805 which averages 147,000 vehicles per day at the intersection. The Plaza Blvd. exit offers a wide variety of restaurant and retail support services. Conclusion: The proposed site is located at the intersection of a well traveled interstate proximate to large demand generators and dense population base. The area is under supplied with hotel rooms as market occupancies reach an annualized 74%. Extended stay rates at existing hotels are well above what the proposed ESA would need to charge to reach the required return. These three conclusions, coupled with the hotel's excellent visibility from a major freeway, indicate favorable conditions for the project's success. EXTENDED STAYAM ERICA, February 19, 2001 John Cain, Planner City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, Calif. 91950 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT FEB 22 2001 Re: Planned Development Permit — 93 room Extended Stay America (File Nos. PD-2000-9, A-2000-2, IS-2000-8) Dear John: After evaluation the current status of our entitlement processing, we are agreeable to making the following modifications to our Code Amendment Requests & Planned Development Permit Application: 1) The average length of stay at our hotels nationwide is 17 days, with only 8%-10% of our guests nationwide staying longer than 30 days. The reasons for the 30+ day stays are attributed to company funded circumstances such as long terms consulting contracts, relocations, construction contracts, etc. Long term stays for personal reasons do not exist primarily due the economics involved, which in the National City location would require an individual to pay $1,300 per month (weekly rate), or $1,950 per month (nightly rate), when an apartment could be rented in the $700- $800 range. Based on these operational issues and bearing in mind National City's concern about stays beyond 30 days, ESA can agree to the following: (1) strict enforcement of re -registration policy wherein guest are required to have credit card charged or additional cash deposited on a weekly basis; (2) not allow any guest to use address of hotel for personal residence; (3) absolutely prohibit guest stays in excess of 90 days. 2) All of our hotels are staffed with management personnel on a 24-hour basis, to accommodate the needs of the guests, and to handle the required administrative and operational tasks. However, our operation does operate under the premise that a manager lives on site in an apartment unit. Therefore, it is necessary for us to continue to request a code amendment to eliminate the requirement for a manager's unit. We would be happy to provide other security measures (i.e. security guard, security cameras, etc.) to supplement management personnel in the operation of the hotel. As previously discussed, Extended Stay America is a nationally recognized, publicly traded company, that specializes in the development of extended stay hotels. There is no franchising or sell-off allowed of any of our 395 hotels around the country. As is customary with all of our properties, management, operation and maintenance of the hotels is in accordance with standardized guidelines and regulations that are enforced on a corporate wide basis. Our hotels are not vulnerable to the potential neglect and mismanagement sometimes found in smaller, privately owned operations with no national presence. Some concerns have been raised regarding the additional traffic that will be generated by our use. It should be noted that in comparison to the other uses that have been proposed and pursued for this site, (neighborhood retail, convenience stores, restaurants, etc.), the required parking and trip generation for our use would be considerably less. Some concerns have been raised by residents about the "extended stay" concept due to some poorly managed and maintained hotels within National City. It should be understood that these facilities offer room rates (weekly and monthly) that are much lower than those projected by Extended Stay America, and thus have a much different guest profile. Additionally, these hotels are older and are poorly maintained, with some of them not being bonafide "extended stay" hotels with kitchens. Extended Stay America is one of many extended stay hotel operations that cater to the extended stay needs of the business person. Other StudioPLUS Deluxe Studios„ EXTENDED STAYAtiffERICA EFFICIENCY STUDIOS. SIUDIOS Cro siland ESA Services, Inc / 16935 West Bernardo Drive / San Diego, California 92127 / P 858-613-1477 / F 858-613-1495 extended stay hotels include Marriott Residence Inn, Marriott Towne Place Suites, Homewood Suites by Hilton, Staybridge Suites, Hawthorne Suites, Woodfm Suites, and Homestead Village. Some concerns have been raised by nearby residents in regards to the potential impact of our hotel on their neighborhood. As depicted on our site plan, no vehicular access or through traffic will be possible across our property from Plaza Blvd. To 12th Street. This should reduce the impact of our project on the adjoining residential neighborhood. Additionally, the absence of restaurant or retail space in our facility reduces the number of average daily trips compared to other commercial uses. We have several existing properties that are located in neighborhood where there are commercial uses adjoining residential uses. The most noteworthy in San Diego County is the hotel currently being entitled in Carlsbad, where much like the National City site, a freeway and residential uses adjoin the site. Other locations where our hotels adjoin residential neighborhoods include properties in Northern California (Fremont & Stockton), where similar to National City, the site design, layout and building orientation has reduced the impact on the neighboring residences Extended Stay America retains the Gallup Company to perform surveys and obtain information from hotel guests on a variety of issues. Extended Stay America consistently receives a Satisfaction Rating in the 4.25 — 4.30 range, with National Luxury Chain Hotels generally receiving a rating around 4.15. The high rating is attributed in large part to the consistent delivery of expected services, with the ESA guests knowing what and what not to expect from our hotels. It is Extended Stay America's objective to develop an attractive, well designed hotel that will be an asset to the community. We appreciate your time and consideration of our project, and would be happy to provide yoy v$ith any ad it s nal information you may need. Kent Real state • _er Exte ed S,tav Am- rice For privacy purposes, your direct extension number is not the same as your room number. It is important that you give this extension number to any friends, family, clients or co-workers that may need to reach you since our front desk is dosed between 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. each day. To reach another guest staying at this property, simply dial their direct extension. In addition to free Local calls, we provide free voice mail. Your voice mail can be retrieved from your room or by remote access. Please inquire at the front desk if you have any questions about the operation of the voice mail system. A data port is located on the side of your phone for your convenience in establishing computer connections. Since our front desk is dosed between 11 p.m. and 7 a.m. each day, we are not able to provide wake up calls. Please use the convenient alarm dock in your room. isi3e.rvicyc Our front desk staff can assist you with mail delivery, fax service and copy service should you need it. Irons, ironing boards and vacuums are available to be checked out for two hours at a time. Safe deposit boxes are also available. Please feel free to ask for more information on these services. oN bon We encourage all of our guests to be "Good Neighbors." To ensure that all of our guests have a pleasant and peaceful stay with us, we ask that you keep noise (music, TV, etc.) to a minimum. We also do not allow pets on the property (except for assisted living canines), this helps maintain the cleanliness of the property and rooms. If you need temporary housing for a pet, please ask the front desk for the kennel closest to the hotel. Studio 'acclim cy Extended StayAmerica's standard studios were designed to comfort- ably accommodate two persons - toddlers (under age three) are the only exception. All occupants of the room must be registered guests. If you need more detailed information on the area, please see the front desk for a listing of local restaurants, dry cleaners, movie theaters, grocery stores, etc. We are here to serve you. Should you have any compliments, comments or concerns, please see the property manager or feel free to contact us toll free at 1-800-EXT-STAY or e-mail us at extstay@extstay.com. Thank you again for choosing Extended StayAmerica Efficiency Studios. We hope you enjoy your time here with us. EXTENDED STAYAMERICA EFFICIENCY STUDIOS® For information, reservations or locations visit us at www.extstay.com or call 1-800-EXT-STAY 02000 Extended Stay America, Inc. All rights reserved. SERVICE DIRECTORY A GUIDE To SERVICES, 'FA'r[ RES, GUEST ACES, AssisrAtcE AND HOTEL PoucES. ES-E-IRD Welcome We would like to thank you for choosing Extended StayAmerica Efficiency Studios®. Our first priority is to make sure your stay is truly pleasant. If this is your first time staying with us, please take a few minutes to read this directory. We hope it will help explain how we operate and what makes us differ- ent from other hotels. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact our front desk. Our Creed • Treat each guest as you would want to be treated. • Treat fellow employees with the respect they deserve. • Be a good steward of all that is entrusted to you. • Use good judgement at all times. This is a creed that we try to live and work by every day. We hope that it shows in all that we do. Extended StayAmerica was created especially for the extended -stay traveler and has some operating practices that differ from ordinary hotels. Although we welcome our overnight guests with open arms, our operating policies and amenities are designed to limit costs for our long-term travelers. In exchange for an affordable home away from home, you won't be paying for marble lobbies, valet parking, convention facilities, bars and restaurants, hair dryers or shoe shine rags. If you like the idea of paying less while getting more of what's important, we know you will feel at home with us. And that's the whole idea. Front Office Hours Our front desk is available to assist you from 7 a.m. to 11 p.m, seven days a week. Should you need help after hours, a night attendant is available to assist you. The attendant can be reached from your room phone, from the courtesy phone located in the lobby or from the phone located in the front of the building. Should you forget your key after hours, please use the phone outside of the building to reach the night attendant who will be able to assist you. You must show proper identification. Housekeeping Housekeeping services, including fresh linen and towels, are provided once every week for our weekly guests. Weekly guests also receive fresh towels on one additional day of each week. For our nightly guests we provide housekeeping services every day. Due to health regulations, we are not able to dean your kitchen wares during your stay. If you have any questions regarding the timing or nature of the services provided, please inquire at the front desk. We strive to offer the lowest and most economical rates in the industry. To help accomplish this, we do not provide shampoos, toothbrushes, razors, etc. We do have these items available for you to purchase in our vending machines, should you need them. Laundry & Vending 'adi .Rs We offer a 24-hour on -site laundry and vending facility. The laundry room is equipped with coin operated washers and dryers for your convenience. Laundry detergent and other related items are available for purchase. Drinks and snacks including coffee and condiments, soda, chips, candy and personal items are also available. Payment ,t Deposit Our payment and deposit terms are as follows: Your guest agreement renews and payment of at least one week's room and tax is due by 11:00 a.m. on the weekly anniversary of your check -in day. Guests checking out early during the first weekly term will be charged the lesser of (1) the weekly rate or (2) the daily rate times the actual number of nights Weekly guests paying with a credit card, need to sign a voucher for payment on a weekly basis. Nightly guests who secure their payment witf a credit card will be charged upon check-out. A deposit of $25 nightly/$100 weekly is required if you pay in cash. Your deposit is fully refundable at check-out, less adjustments for loss, damage, unpaid charges and a cleaning fee if applicable. Additional fee Sche There will be additional charges for any of the following situations: $15 for late payment; $5 lost key or guest lock out after hours, excess deaning fee (this fee is dependent on the condition of the room at check-out). A late check-out fee ranging up to a maximum of one day's rate can be charged for check-outs after 11:00 a.m. Please see the front desk for additional information on these fees. • ..A. xtst, .com or call 1-800-EXT-STAY HANDOUT ITEM 7 December 18, 2000 December 18, 2000 Dear Mr. Mayor, City Council and National City Planning Commission: I visited council chambers when the swearing in of the council members took place. I remember the words of Mr. National Morrison � the n he stated that he felt the biggest problem in Na I also lack of communication between the residents the city was to improve the remember it being said that the goal o quality of life of National City ;a sidents. I those of mythere neighbo�s because we communicate my concerns a do not want to damage our community any further, lowering the quality of our lives. I am here representing my neighbors on E. 11th St.. The Savedra's_ over 30 year residents, the Trevino's over 20 year residents: the Villarino's over 20 year residents: the yeasi olas'sGersc's over 40 years residents; the Carabaial s, over 20 years and my own family, the over 5 years, the Diel's residents. e We are all extremely concerned about Thuet's, 25 year the proposal to build the 93 "extended living" units between Plaza and 12th streets. The proposed hotel, which we all know is transitional alhhousing usi, is a ery better known as an SRO or single room occupancy bad idea. This area is extremely congested and has been There aagued by problems with illegal activities for many years. e already many motels/hotels in the area that have caused many problems for our neighborhood. including dr; gce, violence this prostitution and other crimes. I spoke to a pollavows for the city, officer Saturday and he told us that would be very especially with the crimes that occur in extended living hotels like (2) the Ha'Penny Inn, the Grand Plaza which are within 2 blocks from our homes, and the Sweetwater in. I constantly see the police at the Ha'Penny Inn and at the Grand Plaza. The police officer told us that these hotels are a lot of trouble and they are constantly responding to trouble. He told me it is just as bad at the Sweetawater Inn on Sweetwater road. This type of transitional housing will be a detriment to the long time and committed residents of National City. I worked for a non-profit housing management company for 13 years as an occupancy specialist, resident manger and activities director. Our company, with it's extensive experience of over 22 years at that time, and after extensive research, would not go into the building or management of SRO's (single room occupancy hotels) because the company did not feel it was able to properly manage that type of project because of the great liability and extensive problems associated with this type of housing and the population they attract. The companies that have built and manage these types of projects have on site management (which is difficult to keep) AND security officers. It will not serve the residents of National City. It will attract persons from all areas. We do not need to invite more problems to the city. National City has a reputation as a high crime area and we don't need to make it worse. I was shocked when I read in the letter that was sent out that it was considering having no management on site. Itproved to me that this project is ill conceived and that whoever is building it does not care about the neighborhood, the quality of life of the residents themselves or about the City of National City.. Whether there is management or not, we do not want this project! We already have too many apaitinnent buildings and hotels. From what I have seen in our neighborhood since I have lived in the city, all the murders, shootings, stabbings, prostitution and most drug (3) deals have occurred in hotels and motels in our area. Please, do not hurt our neighborhood even further. Some of the reasons we do not want this project are: 1. We already have to deal with the crime at the Ha'Penny Inn and the Grand Plaza Hotel , extended living hotels in our neighborhood. I am sure these hotels were nice when they first opened but look at them now. Plus, we have a number of other hotels and apartments in the area that have brought crime to our area. 2. There is a school across the street where children from k-8 attend. 3. There is terrible traffic on Plaza especially between of 805 and Palm because of all the hotels, gas stations, hotels, motels, apartments, restaurants, the vegetable store, and because of the traffic getting on or off 805. 4. We already have problems with people coming to our neighborhood and rummaging through our trash. Several of my neighbors have been victims of theft and robbery. 5. Density is a real problem in National City. We need more established homeowners and a less uncommitted transient population. A few years ago I went to the planning department to see about the possibility of dividing our 1/2 acre lot into two lots. The planning department wanted to make sure our plans were not to build apartments, which was not our plan, because of the high density of the city. Now there is a proposal to build 93 apartments one block away. Does that make any sense? Whether NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, Ca. 91950 (619) 336-4310 HANDOUT ITEM NO.7 12/18/2000 Dear Commissioners: Let me start out this letter by saying that I am 43 years old and I have lived in this neighborhood for my entire life. I own a house and I have chosen to raise my family here. The City Codes are here to protect the citizens of National City and those who choose to visit our town. It would be wrong to amend our code to allow for this development to go in as planed. A four story ninety-three unit building without a manger there 24 hours a day would be inviting trouble. Who would use this hotel? Families on vacation? Traveling business people? If so why would they be staying indefinitely? Each room having a kitchenette? As a rule this is not normal. In my experience you would have to ask and pay for a suite. Is this what they are planning The more I think about it, it sounds like a good way to get a cheap apartment in under the guise of being a hotel and that without supervision. Our codes are here to protect our Families. Please uphold the code and do not amend it. Sincerely, Robert L. Tigh 1131 Rave. National City Ca. 91950 HANDOUT ITEM NO.7 12/18/2000 City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 December 9, 2000 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT DEC 12 2000 Dear Commissioners: Concerning the notice received from the Planning Department for a permit for a 93 unit Extended Stay Hotel at the N.W. corner of Plaza BLVD. and 1-805: We feel it is never wise to have an "extended stay" hotel with no time limits plus kitchenette facilities. This tends to attract a lower type of clientele. We would strongly suggest a time limit of 10 days — no longer than 2 weeks. This would allow people on vacation in this area plenty of time. Also, please limit the kitchenette facilities to a small in -room refrigerator and a microwave. To eliminate a manager's unit would also be most unwise. You need a 24-hour manager in charge at all times. We are very thankful that, at long last, this property will be developed, but it must be developed properly or it will be a complete waste of a very valuable piece of land situated at one of the main entrances to National City. Sincerely, Leslie and Roberta Tigh 1831 East 12th Street National City, CA 91950 (619) 477-2301 HANDOUT ITEM NO.7 12/18/2000 December 11, 2000 Planning Commission City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 Gentlemen: NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT We have concerns and questions regarding the proposed extended stay (including kitchens) motel at Hwy 805 and Plaza Blvd. 1. Ninety-three units with no on -site manager seems to be a scenario for trouble. Who takes care of problems in the middle of the night? Surely in ninety-three units there will be some. If a family wants to stay there, where do they pay and get a key? 2. Getting into and out of the motel on Plaza Blvd. will be a problem. It is already difficult to get in and out of Jimmy's, the produce market, the soon to be opened restaurant across the street and the three motels already in the short space between 805 and Palm Ave. plus two apartment build- ings already there. Surely llth and 12th Streets cannot be expected to deal with the traffic. This is a residential neighborhood. It is our understanding this motel has already been turned down at a nearby site. Granted this site}seems difficult but the above motel seems a plan for many many problems. What does the police department feel about another extended stay motel on Plaza? for instance the Ha'Penny Inn. Thank you for your consideration. 6 ears,.-' Mr. and Mrs. Charles R. Bartlett 1639 E. 12th Street National City, CA 91950 copies: Mayor Waters, all City Council members Staff Survey Summary Anaheim No apparent distinction for extended stay facilities, however stays longer than 30 days were prohibited in the CUP we were provided. Daily housekeeping service was also required by the CUP. Carlsbad No distinction between hotel and extended stay facilities. Costa Mesa CUP required for extended stays (over 28 days). Housekeeping services and on site management are required. The CUP specifies number of rooms available for extended stays. Irvine Extended stay facility defined. Extended stay hotels must contain kitchen facilities, and cannot include amenities intended to draw traffic such as restaurant or convention areas. Los Angeles There is no distinction in the Code, but there are distinctions in CUP requirements. A determination was made that extended stay facility is a hotel and not an apartment. The City noted that this is a new type of hotel catering to business travelers and that stays are typically 2.2 weeks. The CUP we were provided requires that the hotel be operated as a commercial hotel and not an apartment. Newport Beach Hotel/motel stays longer than 30 days are prohibited. Oceanside Hotel/motel stays longer than 30 days are prohibited.. Kitchenettes in hotel rooms are allowed. San Diego City No distinction between hotel and extended stay facilities. San Diego County No distinction between hotel and extended stay facilities. City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR INITIAL STUDY Project plans & Environmental Assessment form received on: September 18, 2000 Environmental Assessment form determined complete by: Jon Cain, Associate Planner Initial Study completed by: Andrew Hoskinson— Case File No.: IS-2000-8 Reference Files: PD-2000-9 A-2000-2; Z-2000-7 Date: November 13, 2000 Date: November 15, 2000 Address of Project: Northwest corner of East Plaza Boulevard and Interstate 805. Project Description: The proposed project is a 4 story, 93 unit, Extended Stay America Hotel. Environmental Setting: The project site is a predominately vacant lot with two residences, one that is vacant, located on the northern portion of the lot near 12th Street. The lot gently slopes downward from 12th Street to Plaza Boulevard. Conclusion: 1) X A Negative Declaration is proposed, since X (a) There is no substantial evidence that the project may have a significant effect on the environment; or (b) The project may result in a significant environmental impact but revisions in the plans by the applicant mitigate or avoid the effects where clearly no significant effects would occur; or 2) An EIR is fequired since the project may result in a significant environmental impact. RECOMMENDATION: That the decision -making body consider the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and ford on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. There is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant impact on the environment based on the following discussion of potential, non -significant impacts. The analysis is partially based on a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and Limited Soil Survey conducted by Krazan & Associates, Inc. LAND USE: The project is in conformance with the National City General Plan. Proposed Code Amendments will cause the project to comply with the Land Use Code. The property is in the motel planned development district, a specific plan area that permits hotels. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS: Seismic activity typical of the region may affect the project site. Uniform Building Code standards for construction and Engineering standards for design will address concerns for safety arising from potential groundshaking and eliminate the potential for geologic impacts. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS: Petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was detected in one of eight soil samples collected by Krazan & Associates, Inc. as part of the Limited Soil Survey. Four cubic yards of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated soil found proximate to an area of superficially stained soil will be removed from site and properly disposed of by Krazan & Associates, Inc. as part of the project. This eliminates the potential for significant environmental health impacts. REMOVAL OF EXISTING CONDITIONS: In the course of constructing the 4-story hotel and the associated site improvements, two dilapidated residences will be demolished. Only one of the residences is currently occupied, the other residence is boarded up. Based on the condition of the residences and the zoning classification of the properties, their demolition is not considered a significant impact. LIGHT AND GLARE: The hotel will include both interior and exterior lighting. City code requires that the proposed lighting be directed away from adjoining properties. In addition, the landscaping proposed for the project will reduce the light and glare from the property. The new hotel lighting is consistent with the character of the area, which contains other hotels and motels of varying size and other commercial uses, and will not result in any significant increase in light or glare. ALTERATION OF VIEWS: The proposed hotel will have a maximum height of 55 feet 5 inches, and will be visible from Interstate 805 and nearby properties. The proposed hotel would have the most effect on the views from four residences located on 1e Street. The project is located in an urban setting, and will be built on a site that is vacant except for two dilapidated residences. The addition of the new hotel and the associated landscaping is expected to improve the appearance of the site. REDUCTION OF SOLAR ACCESS: The proposed hotel will have a maximum height of 55 feet 5 inches. City streets and Interstate 805 would separate the proposed building from sites to the north, south and east. The proposed building would be over 80 feet from an existing 1-story restaurant to the west of the site. The existing restaurant is built in the middle of the property, and has a significant roof overhang that shades the windows that wculd face the proposed hotel. The small amount of shade from the proposed hotel that will reach the adjacent property to the west is not expected to have significant negative impacts on solar access or opportunities for passive heating or cooling. TRAFFIC: The proposed project can be expected to generate between 450 and 600 Average Weekday Trips (AWDT), according to San Diego Traffic Generators 1996. Approximately 9 percent of the AWDT can be expected to occur during the peak A.M. hour and approximately 10 percent of the AWDT can be expected to occur during the peak P.M. hour. This increase in traffic volumes will not be significant relative to the existing 32,000 Average Daily Trips (1990 Traffic Counts) because this section of East Plaza currently has the capacity to handle the additional traffic load. The National City Transportation Study projects person trips for hotel and motel uses in the City to increase from 2205 as of 1990 to 4293 by 2015. This represents a 94 percent increase. Additionally, the General Plan Traffic Forecast, in the National City Transportation Study, states that East Plaza Boulevard is proposed to be widened from an existing 4-lane road to a 6-lane road to accommodate projected traffic increases. NOISE: There will be no adverse impacts from noise associated with the project. The construction of the project will result in temporary noise increases to the surrounding uses; however, the construction noise will be regulated by the City's Noise Ordinance. LACK OF PRIVACY FOR ADJACENT USES: The only concern for privacy around the project site involves the residences located on 12th Street to the north of the proposed hotel. This concern is minimal because the proposed hotel would not look into the backyards of the residences, rather it has the potential to create views into the front yards of the residences. The proposed hotel would have 24 windows on the north wall of the building. The finished floor of the proposed hotel would be at 73.5 feet Mean Sea Level (MSL) and the top of the highest row (of four rows) of windows would be at 107 feet MSL. The residences are all built on pads that are at approximately 90 feet above MSL, so only 12 of the windows on the north wall of the proposed hotel would have any view of the residences. The project would not result in any significant impact to the privacy of the adjoining uses the proposed Evergreen trees that would line the 12th Street property line would obscure any potential views from the hotel to the front of the residences on 12th Street. THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM NOTICE The information you provide in this form will be used to determine whether or not an environmental impact report is needed. To avoid unnecessary project delays, the information you provide should be complete, accurate and unbiased. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY GENERAL INFORMATION PLANNING DEPARTMENT FIT,F NO. (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE) TYPE OF PERMIT REQUIRED PAN ba► t /opmt .Jr DATE 9 , /5 - 4' O PERMIT APPLICANT Es, Se.,evic-e,$ PHONE NO. ($ Z) 98r-SS e NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT fy/a77"- cps/tea. eSA $eeeicc.s,2 .ic. �5ds" ckg.,ee/ Arc. 3/? S;47EJa/ K;/f, CA. 9ova a. NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER Maim- Sti; 4 4 I SAPAt t. • Y ► N 1. t N a6,3/. iaNa LotNe- ka 4-ro j CA. c1ae7 NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PERSON WHO PREPARED THE PLAN /4/ C c t9&C 9/0fi 144I01,64e-- 3164. 'Weir iowe.0 Sov', aevicerrlf;l(s, c�P 9O J a DATE OF PREPARATION 9-f$'- 0O LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE JOB SITE A 7 cLte. SITE ADDRESS ?/.,e cL. 34.1c. 4 $ '3 rgee.uvay FOR RESIDENTIAL: NO. OF DWELLING UNITS FOR COMMERCIAL: �y- TYPE OF BUILDING Al .$Ta,(08 (93 urti %") %%T �3�e JL. SQUARE FOOTAGE 7 3/ //ff���� FOR INDUSTRIAL: TYPE OF BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OTHER: TYPE OF BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA INITIAL STUDY (General Instructions) The State of California requires cities to assess the environmental impact of all development projects before permits for such action are issued. The attached form will assist you in pLesenting the environmental effects of your project. The form consists of the following sections. A. BACKGROUND INFORMATION You will be asked to give a general description of the project and its environmental setting. B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT You will be asked to respond to a series of yes/no questions. A "yes" answer will mean the project could have significant environmental effects. These answers will be reviewed by the Environmental Impact Committee to determine whether an Environmental Impact Report will be required. C. STATEMENT OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS You should complete this section only if you answer "yes" to one or more of the questions in Section B, but still believe the project will have no significant environmental effects. D. ADDITIONAL DATA You may be asked to answer other questions and submit additional information to determine whether an EIR is required for the project. If required information is not submitted within four (4) months from receipt of written notification by the Planning Department, or an extended p°riod of time acceptable to staff, the application and project shall be considered withdrawn. E. CERTIFICATION You will be asked to certify the truth and accuracy of your statements. INITIAL STUDY (continued) A. Background Information 1. Give a brief description of the proposed project. Include within this discussion the principal engineering proposals. pleopdtsta..S_ p•gotecT w; // !ate oL sT.ej; 9 3 u. •,•; T , c,c re rtd e GC 57;i% f%rr.die; ca_ / LI, e . yco"is7eK.T,'o.J, u,;7 co", c..€07Z lZoo , E=Y `$' e 7Ze;o ie 4Nc( i Tie, ea- coAeidogs. 2. Describe the environmental setting, including distinguishing natural and man-made characteristics. The discussion should be of the site without (before) the project and include the imme- diate areas surrounding the site. '.ke_ c tt e,ee�„ i se?l,^-17. of _ Fe."7“7— ,<°'; a :.S A__7 � aEor,-,:rra� y 1/'otcas,. I Go / w;7� 714,0 ct:l•a.picL e-k //A.ou-s e_.$ ( 1 ✓aca.rf t3o4 eae.g 4`11) a 04cC... maM./ ve lades (.74....K) )242/lee( a.T- rk .e .10pee 3e.c t`o•a. Tke_. ck,e2ew 2 5e /i..-„q et/50 cobI7 i1'tTs To Ya.g4a.rcj/ a N `! i 2cx.5 L. du ►n74 /-vcr di.-7- 4 ® 71 'TIT- e- FRD/0 S, e eX , ?i�7'Gc r S: T-_ mice 4 1/4cewT pieettie77 (ea2,e.e-rTlt A.A. ot6etNecoovek ,e4s e ,v . INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT Answer the following questions by placing a check in the appropriate space in Column A. Specific Questions 1. Does the project significantly change the present use of the project area? (The project area includes the im- mediate location of the project, as well as more remote areas that may be directly or indirectly affected by construction and/or operation of the project.) 2. Does the project alter any unique, natural or manmade features? 3. Does the project affect the conser- vation of any natural or scenic re- sources or scarce natural resources? 4. Does the project alter the biological habitat of flora, fauna or endangered species? 5. Does the project alter or change ex- isting features of any ocean, beach, estuary, bay or tidelands? 6. Does the project alter the land form of topography in excess of 25 percent? 7. Will the project contribute to in- crease flooding? 8. Will the project increase the possi- bility of erosion or sedimentation? 9. Does the project involve any geologi- cal hazards? 10. Will the project increase the possi- bility of earth slippage? Column A Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 11. Will the project contribute advers- ly to the quality of air? INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A 12. Will the project affect the use of existing or proposed recreational areas? 13. Will the project affect areas of his- toric, archaeological or aesthetic value? (The setting of such sites includes surrounding areas, the nature of which are important to the under- standing and enjoyment of the site itself.) 14. Will the project accelerate the dev- elopment of adjoining non -urban areas? (Examples include the introduction of facilities such as streets, roads, water mains or sewerage lines in such a manner as to facilitate development or intensification of the use of an area.) Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 7 15. Will the project tax the City's or other agency's ability to provide necessary facilities? 16. Will the project require any variance from existing environmental standards (air, water, noise)? 17. Will the project alter the character of existing communities? (Examples in- clude, but are not limited to: Changes in traffic patterns Effects on access within the com- munity to commercial establish- ments, schools, parks, etc. Introduction of activities not presently found within the community.) 18. Is the land use proposed by the pro- ject in opposition to the City's ex- isting : plans, programs, and policies? INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A 19. Will the project require a change in zone, adopted community or general plan? 20. Does the project require any variation from existing codes and ordinances? 21. Will the project significantly change the average population density of the community? 22. Will the project alter the lifestyle of the community? Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No 7 ,/ ty" Y 23. Will the project result in overcrowding, a lack of privacy for adjoining develop- ment within the community? 24. Will the project alter or eliminate views? 25. Will the project reduce solar access or opportunities for passive heating and cooling on the site or on nearby property or result in other effects on climate or micro -climate? 26. Will the project result in increased light or glare? 27. Will the project alter or limit access to public facilities or recreational resources? 28. Will the project affect transportation systems? 29. Will the project affect utility networks? 30. Will the project affect the existing community facilities or city services? 31. Does the project involve the demolition or removal of existing improvements? existing the existing f�f V` I / #:77 INITIAL STUDY (continued) B. ASSESSMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT (continued) Column A 32. Does the project alter or improve the employment base of the community? Column B Staff Analysis Yes Maybe No Yes Maybe No ✓I 33. Could the project significantly affect the potential use, extraction, or conser- vation of a scarce natural resource? (Ex- amples include, but are not limited to: Developments which effectively pre- clude the extraction of the region's rock, sand, gravel, or other mineral resources. Uses which effectively preclude the multiple use of regional natural resources in scarce supply. Activities which tend to diminish the supply or availability of regional natural resources that are in scarce supply.) 34. Are any of the natural or manmade fea- tures in the project area unique, that is not found in other parts of the City, County, State, or nation? (Unique features include those areas, structures, biological phenomena, etc., that exhibit distinguish- ing characteristics not found in other areas, or, only in a small number of other areas. Such features can be either good or bad for human health, safety, comfort, or conveniences.) ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STATEMENT (continued) C. STATEMENT OF NO SIGNIFICANT ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS If you have answered yes to one or more of the questions'in Section B, but still think the project will have no significant environmental effects, indicate your reasons below. THIS IS VERY IMPORTANT. Attach additional pages, if necessary. N/4 D. ADDITIONAL DATA 1. If there are any Army Corps of Engineers or other Governmental Agency public notices or permit numbers applicable to this project, cite them and give dates. 2. Estimate the amount of grading in cubic yards. 11, 000 3: What are the maximum heights of man-made slopes, etc. E. CERTIFICATION I hereby acknowledge that the above Environmental Assessment Statement is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Date 9/!/©0 Date /8/00 Siyued ES1 SeRte;ces, r,,4c. Permit Applicant Signed Person who this application APPLICATION for Conditional Use Permit Planned Development' 'Permit Planned Unit :. *-Development Permit NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA Make checks payable to the City of National City File application with the: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 (619) 336-4310 PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WHEN COMPLETING 'Fib FORM FORDEPARTMENT USE ONLY Case Number I ! `- ,A060 / Filing Fee $ Receipt No. Date Received By E.A.F. Required Fee $ Related Cases LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Attach if insufficient space) Sze. / f c h,c c( lgt�N 557•1120• Dys z 1, 22, a6, 27/ 3a PROPERTY LOCATION al% Meg. . No. Street between / Z T" ST. and ?lw t" Sivet .' sox- Fwl/. COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION C �7 " ?.b Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 1 of 4 REQUEST: The Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit (Chapter 18.116), Planned Development Permit (Chapter 18.126), or Planned Unit Development Permit (Chapter 18.30) to use the above described property for the following purposes: To de veto Is a iS CONSTIuter o` 413 uHir Fir t ed $TKy A,steC;c. L U.7e L. e..eL ir w:Il ltwvt a KtTItu0 wit; w► ll ;14cLaitaintil V z t to F,L oidi.To+e. i a botaMete. sTov.e dru4 , INkeoewtrrt., oit n �►re atv4,44142. sI z e oF 32 7 Sp. Fr.' PROPERTY OWNER(S) of all property included in this application: (Attached extra sheets if necessary). Name: ;jiotr414-544t'1 141 Signature (Signature acknowledges that this application is being filed) Address: a%,3I ror4 Na L• (. CA. ' a oy Phone No. 6($7) 9$Z• $t ?t Fax No. Date: - See 47 c_ te( Fiev•h owNee Name: Sit e4K yKrl tH A; M Signature (Signature acknowledges that this application is being filed) Address; Phone No. Fax No. Date: 54 4142 /444.7reti.t47779w be %ree Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 2 of 4 APPLICANT Name: , 5.4 Seees, =N C (Please type or print) Signature: (Signature certifies that the information submitted with this application is true and accurate to the best of the applicant's knowledge). Address: asa s- ciAtRRt ihrt. gA3/O Sirmil Mill CA. 906'06- 2037 Phone No. (sir Z) q 0 "' 6811Q Fax No. C .SS Z) 9q'7 ` 0/ trnw Date: 9 . ,Ss. 00 Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 3 of 4 September 11, 2000 Mr. Jon Cain Planning Department City of National City 1243 National City, CA Blvd. National City, CA 91 950 Re: Extended Stay America site plan approval application! Parcel Numbers: 557-420-04 557-420-21 557-420-22 557-420-26 557-420-27 557-420-32 Dear Jon: As the current owner of the parcels listed above, located within the City of National City, L authorize Extended Stay America to submit a site plan application and other documents associated with the request for approval of a 93 unit Extended Stay America hotel on the site. Sincerely, Jiunn-Shiung Lin EXTENDED STAYAM.ERICA . September 7, 2000 Mr. Jon Cain Planning Dept. City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 Dear Jon: Thank you for meeting with me and other representatives of Extended Stay America recently about our proposed hotel construction at the northwest quadrant of I-805 and Plaza Blvd. I would like to reiterate some background information about our company and hotel product. Extended Stay America is a New York Stock Exchange traded company (symbol: ESA) which owns and operates 380 hotels nationwide. Currently we have 28 hotels open in the State of California. We just opened a 160 unit hotel on Hotel Circle in Mission Valley. Extended Stay America hotels offer both nightly and weekly rates to corporate and personal travelers in need of high quality accommodations. All guest rooms are furnished with a kitchenette with two burner stove and full size refrigerator, coffee maker, microwave, table with chairs, a recliner, voice mail, and a computer data port. As we discussed, the development of the proposed 93 unit Extended Stay America hotel will require that a few amendments be made to the current zoning codes. These requested changes are as follows: 1) All motels shall have a manager's apartment. - Each Extended Stay America hotel is staffed by a full time General Manager who lives off -site. Although there is always someone available behind the front desk, the manager does not live on site. We request that this requirement be removed or amended. 2) Kitchen or kitchenette facilities are prohibited. - Each Extended Stay America room has a kitchenette which includes a two burner stove, full size refrigerator, and microwave. We request that this limitation be removed from the codes. StudioPLUS Deluxe Srudios'® EXTENDED a- ,,,,,,;, M E R l: A EFFICIENCY STUDIOS® Crss/add P A AAnnnnumenr Inr / 9S9S Chem, Avonuo Cuite 410 / clonal Hill California 90R06 3) Guest stays of 30 days or more are prohibited. - The average length of stay for our guests is about 14 days. Some guests do stay for more than 30 days. However, each guest is checked in and out every 7 days (the maximum prepayment term). We do not offer monthly leases and extended stay guests are still subject to transient occupancy taxes and other laws pertaining to nightly hotel guests. We request that this limitation be removed or amended. Thank you very much for your assistance. Please feel free to give me a call at 312-372- 4400 ext. 403 if you have any questions. We are looking forward to becoming part of the City of National City. With regards, Derrick Swaak Real Estate Manager City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING —CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CHURCH AT 1540 E. 18Th STREET (APPLICANT: JOSE C. SORIANO, SR.) (CASE FILE NO.: CUP-1999-6) PREPARED BY Jon Cain - Associate PlanniEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The Council set this item for hearing at the February 6 meeting. The attached background report describes the proposal in detail. Environmental Review X ,Categorical Exemption Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Conditional Use Permit be approved. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to approve the Conditional Use Permit. Vote: Ayes — Valderrama, Godshalk, Ungab, Baca, Martinelli, Detzer Absent — Parra ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Background Report 2. Planning Commission Resolution with Findings and Conditions 3. Finding for Denial I,ocation Map A-200 (9:991 Resolution No. 5. Citizen Letters 6. Department comments 7. Notice of Exemption 8 Application and Applicant's Plans BACKGROUND REPORT The applicant proposes to use an existing 1,559 square foot building at the southwest corner of E. 18th Street and Plaza Boulevard for a church. The 40-member First Filipino Evangelical Methodist Church will use a 414 square foot space for a meeting room and utilize the remainder of the building for office space. Services will be conducted Sundays between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. and between 5:00 and 9:00 p.m.; Wednesday services will be conducted between 7:00 and 9:00 p.m. Choir practices are proposed on Fridays from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. The site and much of the adjacent area is zoned Limited Commercial (CL), as shown on the attached map. The building that the church proposes to use was formerly used as a produce store. An 837 square foot building used as a retail store is also located on the property. Other properties at the intersection of 18d' and Palm are also occupied by commercial businesses. Otherwise the area is characterized by residential uses, including primarily single-family homes to the south, and a mix of single-family homes, apartments, and duplexes in the surrounding area. The project involves painting the building and replacing broken windows, modification of the parking lot, removal of existing dilapidated signage on the property, and new landscaping. Since the building and signage are in a state of disrepair and the landscaping is poorly maintained, the proposal will improve the appearance of the property. The parking lot will include 19 spaces, three more than are required by the Code to serve the proposed church and retail store on the same property. The church meeting room where services would be held would be located at the north end of the building. This location is at the opposite end of the building from the nearest home. The applicant has indicated that a choir would typically sing at services. Since the building has operable windows, music and other sounds from the church could potentially disturb nearby residents. A separate Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request for a church on this property was denied in 1977. The church, Iglesia El Gethsemani de Pentecostes, operated in the other building on the lot without the required CUP for three months, and was the subject of code enforcement activity. Two residents expressed opposition to the project in writing and at the Planning Commission public hearings based on concern regarding parking, noise, and the potential impacts of the church on property values. Letters are attached. The Planning Commission discussed the fact that the use would likely have no more affect on the neighbors than a commercial use, and voted to approve the Conditional Use Permit with an added condition requiring that noise levels from the church comply with the Noise Ordinance. Findings and conditions for approval are included in the attached Planning Commission resolution. A possible fmding for denial is also attached. A building permit application was recently submitted for a produce store in the building proposed for use as a church. No exterior improvements are proposed as part of the produce store. The produce store will be the likely tenant if the CUP is not approved. RESOLUTION NO.06-2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A CHURCH AT 1540 E. 18TH STREET APPLICANT: JOSE C. SORIANO, SR. CASE FILE NO. CUP-1999-6 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit application to allow a church at 1540 E. 18th Street at a duly advertised public hearing held on December 18, 2000 and continued to the meeting of January 8, 2001 at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the staff reports contained in Case File No. CUP-1999-6 maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearings; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable proceduresrequired by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearings held on December 18, 2000 and January 8, 2001, support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the proposed use will take place in an existing structure and since the parcel is large enough to accommodate the required parking spaces. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, sincethe proposed use is served by 18th Street and Palm Avenue, both of which are collector streets with sufficient capacity to handle traffic to the site. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the use will have more than the required parking area and will take place within a building. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since it will provide opportunities for residents to attend religious services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use Permit authorizes the use of an existing 1,559 square foot building as a church. All plans submitted for permits associated with the facility shall conform with Exhibit A -Revised, case file no. CUP-1999-6, dated 12/5/2000, except as modified by conditions of approval. 2. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Mechanical, Plumbing, and Electrical Codes and the California Title 24 energy and handicapped regulations. 3. Deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements (15 feet of sidewalk) along the property frontage shall be removed and replaced, and the abandoned driveway apron along Palm Avenue shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks in accordance with City standards. 4. Street improvements along the property frontage shall be kept free from weed growth. 5. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way. 6. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 7. Hours of church services shall be limited to Sundays between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. and 5:00 and 9:00 p.m., and Wednesdays between 7:00 and 9:00 p.m. 8. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 9. Noise levels shall not exceed those allowed in Title 12 of the National City Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERI'ihICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of January 22, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: VALDERRAMA, GODSHALK, UNGAB, BACA, MARTINELLI, DETZER. NAYS: ABSENT: PARRA. ABSTAIN: X, 12'4 FINDING FOR DENIAL 1. That the proposed use will have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the use will reduce available on -street parking for adjacent residents, and since noise from the use will disturb nearby residents. PROJECT LOCATION EXISTING BUILDINGS 1835 RS-3-PD ZONE BOUNDARY NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 12/6/00 INITIAL HEARING: 12/18/00 HANDOUT ITEM NO.8 12/18/2000 December 13, 2000 City of National City Planning Department Attn: John Cain 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 9t950 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Re: Case File No. CUP-1999-6 Dear Mr. Cain: I am responding to the correspondence received December 7, 2000 regarding the above referenced application for a Conditional Use Permit for a church at 1526 East 18th Street, National City. I am opposed to the granting. of this CUP and the use of the subject property for the purposes of a church. Several years ago a church operated in that same building for several months without a permit. Upon proper application and public hearing, the CUP was denied for several reasons. In am unsure of the exact date of that event. However, I am sure that a review of the records of The Planning Department will show that very similar case and the reasons for denial of the permit. The property in question and the proposed building is not functionally suited for church services or similar group gatherings. The following list will focus on a few of the objectionable circumstances which the surrounding residents can/will be subjected to: • Loud and continuing noise nuisance most likely occurring several times a week and could occur from early afternoon throughout the evening hours. At times until 10:00 P.M. at night. Overcrowding of the subject building with more than the allowed occupants. Definite fire hazard, safety issues and risks. Improper environmental and building facilities to accommodate this type of use. • Parking of non-resident cars on 18th Street, Palm Avenue and 0 Avenue where space is currently used by residents for their vehicles and visitors vehicle parking. The location of 1526 E. 18th Street for the use of a church is inappropriate. It was not constructed for such use and I cannot believe that it can be properly converted with the necessary retrofits to meet code compliance requirements and also satisfy and alleviate all the issues which will exist and impact the surrounding residents. City of National City, Planning Department Case File No. CUP-1999-6 December 13, 2000 Page 2 An alternative location for the applicants purposes is appropriate. For the number of members stated in the permit application, a store front/office location in one of the business parks or small strip commercial centers located in or around National City would be a type of location that would be much better suited for the purpose the applicant intends. Noise abatement, parking, occupant facilities, conversion and code problems that apply with the issuance of a CUP for 1526 E. 18th Street might very likely be less demanding for a location in an established non-residential development, planned and constructed, rented and maintained for such non-residential uses. All of my concerns and opposition are based on previously experiencing the use of 1526 E. 18th Street as a "church". The loud voice noises and music echoing from this small structure with no acoustic or other construction enhancements, including adequate occupancy and parking, for church use is unreasonable and should not be considered for such use. I have resided in National City all my life. The property located at 1511, 1517 & 1519 E. 18th Street are family residences. My mother who is 85 years old resides at 1517 E. 18th Street and has been a resident of this City for 79 years. My daughter and her family reside at 1511 E. 18th Street. This issue is meaningful to all of us. From past experience I also know that the impact on surrounding residents, many who are renters and not notified homeowners, will experience the same disturbing and disruptive occurrences that I and my family members (owner/occupied residents) experience. I will be unable to appear on December 18, 2000 for the public hearing to voice my concerns in person. Therefore, I trust that this written letter of concern and opposition to the granting of CUP-1999-6 will be considered the same in my personal absence. Please feel free to contact me if I can clarify or offer any additional information regarding this matter. Sincerely, udith L. Tillman 1519 E. 18th Street National City, CA 91950-5024 Unlisted Telephone: (619) 477-6646 (CityNC-CUP-1999-6) January 3, 2001 Planning Department City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 Re: Hollie M. McVay 561 222 22 00 NATIONAL Cf'fY PLANNING DEPARTMENTi To Whom It May Concern: I am writing on behalf of my Grandmother, Hollie M. McVay, and (age 90) that has lived in this house since 1945. We are responding to the notice that we received on the public hearing scheduled for January 8, 2001. Subject: Plans to convert an existing 1,560 sq. ft.. structure for use as a church at 1526 E. 18'h street, National City. I am writing to you in opposition of having this existing property being converted into a church. We live directly on the right hand side of the building. My concerns are as follows: I do not want people parking in front of my house. Even though it is specified on this letter that there will be ample parking spaces for the patrons of this church I still feel that the over flow of people will still park in front of my house, and very close to my driveway making it very hard for me and my family to pull out or in the driveway (the driveway is very small), and to park in front of our own house. I am also very concerned about the noise level that will be coming out of the church. I can safely assume that they will have some type of music or piano to play music while having their church services. They will also congregate outside of the church after their services to talk afterwards causing their voices to carry into my living room, along with the music and church sermons. They will be attending church on Wednesday nights and the majority of the day on Sunday. I am speaking from experience regarding this issue. A few years ago I lived in Chula Vista and across the street from my house was a church. They also held their meetings and services during the week and on weekends. They were very loud with their music. They also had ample enough parking about a half a block, if that behind the church. But they chose to park in front of my house. This caused me a great deal of inconvenience. I had to park about a block away from my house carrying my two small children at the time. They also congregated in front of my house after the church services to talk and to let their children run around and scream, causing my family lack of sleep, especially waking up my small children. Do to the fact that we had to get up very early in the morning to get our children to daycare and my husband and Ito work. This is one of the main reasons we chose to move. It was very tiring fighting this inconvenience. In closing, my Grandmother and the rest of the family are very much against seeing this structure made into a church. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 1( tintAar Michelle Millsaps For Hollie M. McVay City of National City Office of the City Engineer 1243 National City Blvd., National City, California 91950-4397 (619) 336-4380 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT December 15, 2000 HANDOUT ITEM NO. 8 December 18, 2000 9 Ls W . ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REVIEW OF PROPOSED CHURCH AT 1526 E. 18TH STREET To: Roger G. Post, Director of Planning Department From: Adam J. Landa, Engineering Department Via: Stephen M. Kirkpatrick, Principal Civil Engineer Subject: PROPOSED CHURCH AT 1526 E. 18TH STREET 1. n00 The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements (15' of sidewalks) along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced (Ordinance 1473, 1491, 1734,1927, 1954, 92-2033). 2. The existing street improvements along the property frontage(s) shall be kept free from weed growth by the use of special weed killers, or other approved methods (Ordinance 99-2164). 3. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the Public Right -of -Way (Ordinance 1473, 1491, 1734, 1927, 1954, 92- 2033). 4. Street improvements shall be in accordance with the City Standards. Abandoned driveways aprons (on Palm Avenue) shall be replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalks (Ordinance 1473, 1491, 1734, 1927, 1957, 92-2033 and 99-2164). AJL:jha2 1526 P9 Recycled Paper City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: County Clerk County of San Diego P.O. Box 1750 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 260 San Diego, CA 92112 Project Title: CUP-1999-6 Project Location: 1526 E. 18th Street Contact Person: Jon Cain Telephone Number: (619) 336-4310 Description of Nature, Purpose and Beneficiaries of Project: Conditional Use Permit to allow an existing building to be used for a church. Applicant: Exempt Status: 111 Statutory Exemption. ® Categorical Exemption, Section 15301 (Class 1, Existing facilities) 1111 Not a project as defined in Section 15378 of CEQA Not subject to CEQA (Sec. 15061b3) Jose C. Soriano, Sr. Telephone Number: (619) 427-7772 Reasons why project is exempt: The project involves the minor alteration of an existing, 1,560 square foot structure in an urbanized area for use as a church. Theproposeduse will not substantially increase the intensity of the use of the property, and does not have potential for impacting the environment. Date: Jon Cain Associate Planner ® Recycled Paper NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA APPLICATION for Conditional Use Permit Planned Development Permit Planned Unit Development Permit Make checks payable to the City of National City File application with the: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 (619) 336-4310 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Attach if insufficient space) LOTS 43 TO 46, INCLUSIVE. IN BLOCK 4 OF WTNNETKA TERRACR, PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WHEN COMPLETING THIS FORM FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Case Number Filing Fee S Date Received E.A.F. Required Related Cases eif-/ 99 l Receipt No. (76l By Fee $ ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NUMBER 1420, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 1, 1912. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER 561-222-23-00. PROPERTY LOCATION 1526 EAST 18th STREET, NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA 91950 No. Street baOF: 18th Street and PALM COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION COMMERCIAL — 4.jv. jTpip Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 1 of 4 REQUEST: The Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit (Chapter 18.116), tlhunutli to use the above described property for the following purposes: A CHURCH, SO NAMED, "FIRST FILIPINO EVANGELICAL METHODIST CHURCH. THE CHURCH HAS A SUSTAINING MEMBERSHIP OF 38 MEMBERS'WHO MEET REGULARLY EACH SUNDAY. THE CHURCH WOULD HAVE OCCASIONAL SATURDAY AND EVENING USE FOR CHURCH PURPOSES i.e. BIBLE STUDIES AND BOARD MEETINGS. PROPERTY OWNER(S) of all property included in this application: (Attached extra sheets if necessary). Name: MARY LORRAINE AVITIA Name: Signature Signature (Si ature acknowledges that this (Signature acknowledges that this application is being filed) application is being filed) Address: 17778 LAKESPRING AVENUE PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA 93591-3340 Address: Phone No (0,5) _24 if Phone No. Fax No. Fax No. Date: q...- ' y 7 Date: Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December. 1998 Page 2 of 4 JUSTIFICATION Section 18.116.020 of the National City Municipal Code states that before any conditional use permit, planned development permit or planned unit development permit is granted, the applicant must show the existence of the following facts: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape; and 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the quantity and quality of traffic generated by the proposed use; and 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties; and 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or welfare. The above findings must be incorporated into each staff report for a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Development Permit or Planned Unit Development Permit presented to the decision making body. Each of the findings must be found to exist. As the applicant, you are not required to provide justification of these findings; however, the information can be useful to Planning Staff when compiling their report. Please provide any additional information which may be helpful when considering the application. Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 4 of 4 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 (-ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING — PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF 7TH STREET WEST OF ROOSEVELT AVENUE AND THE ADJACENT ALLEY (APPLICANT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION) (CASE FFIILE NO.: SC-2000-1) PREPARED BY Jon Cain - Associate Plann D PARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The Council set this item for hearing at the February 6 meeting. Public hearing notices were mailed and published in the paper; however, notices have not been physically posted at the site. Staff recommends that the item be continued for three weeks to allow for the proper posting in accordance with State law. Environmental Review X N/ACategorical Exemption Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION fel° Staff recommends that the public hearing be continued to the meeting of March 20. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the street vacation. Vote: Ayes — Valderrama, Godshalk, Ungab, Baca, Martinelli, Detzer Absent — Parra ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Location Map Resolution No. A-200 (9.99) N A 0tP AREA TO BE VACATED I DRN. DATE: 01/09/01 INITIAL Roosevelt and the adjacent alley SC-2000-1 HEARING: NATIONAL CITY PLANNING 01/22/01 Portion of 7th Street west oO CATION M A P City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE (-ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ESTABLISH ANGLE PARKING ON 3RD STREET BETWEEN NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD AND "A" AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE (J. HAAS TSC ITEM NO. 2001-2) PREPARED BY Adam J. Landa DEPARTMENT Engineering EXPLANATION 4 FEBRUARY 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. Mr. John D. Hass, of Office Furniture Outlet at 241 National City Boulevard, has requested the installation of angle parking located on the south side of his building at 3rd Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue. According to Mr. Hass, they need additional parking for their customers and employees. Staff has investigated the site and found that the location at 3rd Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue is able to accommodate 60° angle parking. There is a total of 48' face of curb to face of curb. Angle parking requires a total of 30' leaving 18' for a travel lane and parking stalls (see attached location map). There are 9 existing parking stalls. With the proposed angle parking, there will be a total of 17 parking spaces. The Traffic Safety Committee approved the angle parking on 3rd Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue at their meeting on February 14, 2001. Environmental Review x N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. 'r' BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Traffic Safety Committee at its meeting of February 14, 2001 approved the angle parking on 3rd Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Resolution 2. Staff Report to the Traffic Safety Committee Resolution No. 2001-25 00-2 A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2001— 25 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ESTABLISH ANGLE PARKING ON THIRD STREET BETWEEN NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD AND "A" AVENUE ON THE NORTH SIDE WHEREAS, John D. Hass of Office Furniture Outlet at 241 National City Boulevard has requested the installation of angle parking located on the south side of his business at Third Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue on the north side; and WHEREAS, the Traffic Safety Committee has recommended approval of angle parking on Third Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue on the north side at its regular meeting on February 14, 2001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City that the City Engineer is authorized to establish angle parking on the north side of Third Avenue between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue. PASSED and ADOPTED this 27th day of February, 2001. George H. Waters, Mayor Al LEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: " /0 ZA: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney \ 2 NATIONAL CITY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT FOR FEBRUARY 14, 2001 ITEM TITLE: REQUEST FOR ANGLE PARKING ON 3RD STREET BETWEEN NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD AND "A" AVENUE (BY: J. HAAS. TEL. NO. 477-0600) PREPARED BY: Adam J. Landa, Engineering Department DISCUSSION: Mr. John D. Haas, of Office Furniture Outlet at 241 National City Boulevard, has requested the installation of angle parking located on the south side of his building at 3`d Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue. According to Mr. Hass, they need additional parking for their customers and employees. Staff has investigated the site and found that the location at 3rd Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue is able to accommodate 60° angle parking. There is a total of 48' face of curb to face of curb. Angle parking requires a total of 30' leaving 18' for a travel lane and parking stalls (see attached location map). There are 9 existing parking stalls. With the proposed angle parking, there will be a total of 17 parking spaces. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of angle parking on 3`d Street between National City Boulevard and "A" Avenue. EXHIBITS: 1. Letter 2. Location Map 2001-2 Office Furniture Outlet A DIVISION OF SAN DIEGO BUSINESS INTERIORS January 25, 2001 The City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 cny OF N111"'emu- ( 1 F EN�m imm INEERNNC DFpi RECEIVED Dete,t j a--91 ! .- a The management of Office Furniture Outlet is formerly requesting a hearing to allow parallel parking on the south side of our building along 3ro street. We are in dire need of additional parking for our customers and employees. Recently, Office Furniture Outlet had requested a variance for parking time limits from 1 hour to 2 hours on National City Boulevard. Regretfully, we have been denied. Please note that Office Furniture Outlet continues to be a "good neighbor" and an asset to National City. We have won a beautification award for our building, and every Sunday, we allow our building to be used for the National City Police to train the canine units. Office Furniture Outlet also employs over 20 people and many live in the National City area and generate a substantial amount of business and taxes for the city. Your consideration would be greatly appreciated. I do hope we can come to a positive decision in a timely manner. Again, thank you in advance for your consideration. John D Haas Pr- - - - nt f., D Haas Jr. erations Manager 8840 Miramar Rd. San Diego, CA 92126 (858) 271-9700 c..., McR131_ 71_c 777 241 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 (619) 474-0600 Fax (619) 4740783 n m PA 0' RAVEL 72' 7 jI V .<[ 7 OFFICE Fu JmL1E OUTLET \\\) \\\ N 4 .‹C • AVEL 6' LANE- LAN - STALL DEPTH I LOCATION AfiCALIP, F I I I MEETING DATE {`0'2/27 / 0 1 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #34 PREPARED BY ROBERT A. RABAGO DEPARTMENT FINANCE EXPLANATION Ratification of Warrant Register #34 per government section code 37208. CEnvironmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director STAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend certification of these warrants for a total of $362,458.20 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 69-63Z,ceCti ° 4huv ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Warrant Register #34 2. Workers' Comp Warrant -Register dated 2/14/01 Resolution No. A-200 (9;99) A-200 (9 99 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 2 7,2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ITEM TITLE CONSOLIDATED CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 PREPARED BY A. Hunter DEPARTMENT Finance EXPLANATION For the City Council's information and in compliance with the City's investment policy, the consolidated cash and investment report as of Sep. 30, 2000 is hereby submitted. This report reflects the components of the investment portfolio as of Sep. 30, 2000 and the results of the investment program for the period then ended. The investment portfolio provides for sufficient liquidity to meet the following month's estimated expenditures. CEnvironmental Review N/A Financial Statement Not applicable. Approved By: Finance Direc or Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION We recommend that the report be accepted and filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Cash Account Summary. 2. Portfolio Summary. 3. Portfolio Details - Investments. 4. Activity Report , Sorted by Brokers Resolution No. 5. Consolidated Cash Report. 6. Monthly Statement of Receipts. 7. Monthly Statement of Disbursements. 8. I 1nvectmpnt Transactions Report. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CASH ACCOUNT SUMMARY 30-Sep-00 BALANCE REVOLVING CASH $ 3,599.57 RETURNED CHECKS 6,051.80 BANK OF AMERICA #80200 1,461,786.71 OUTSTANDING WARRANTS (199,083.13) PAYROLL OUTSTANDING WARRANTS (68,719.68) CASH HELD BY BROKERS 110,448.82 INVESTMENTS 23,642,852.35 LAIF 7,266,405.41 TOTAL $ 32,223,341.85 INVESTMENT EARNINGS HISTORY: FISCAL YEAR YEAR-TO-DATE TOTAL YEAR 2000-01 $ 301,955.75 $ 1999-00 31,607.16 1998-99 18,839.22 1997-98 132,747.35 1996-97 78,530.38 1995-96 197,291.65 1994-95 201,572.68 1993-94 148,667.19 1992-93 32,279.17 1991-92 22,981.97 1990-91 -37,934.18 1989-90-25,865.40 1988-89 160, 780.98 1987-88 69,839.80 1986-87 153,761.42 1985-1986 435,675.63 1,841,539.16 1,702,889.57 1,478,232.91 1,256,907.31 974,113.25 1,001,709.56 1,011,586.52 721,913.49 864,052.63 1,303,878.52 1,544,993.71 1,311,930.94 979,435.87 1,048,978.23 1,321,688.93 0900 Combined Cash Reconciliation Worksheets 11 SymPro Investments City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary September 30, 2000 Par Market Value Value Book % of Value Portfolio City of National City Days to YTMIC YTM/C Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 385 Equiv. Certificates of Deposit - Monthly Certificates of Deposit - Maturity Negotiable/Transferable CDs Federal Agency Securities Pass Through Securities Investments 7,515,000.00 194,000.00 4,962,000.00 11,050,000.00 283,531.54 7,515,000.00 7,515,000.00 31.79 509 222 6.526 6.617 194,000.00 194,000.00 0.82 1,081 730 6.436 6.526 4,704,223.77 4,593,863.14 19.43 1,950 1,394 8.037 8.148 10,898,431.37 11,047,116.09 46.73 1,288 822 6.169 6.255 288,344.92 292,873.12 1.24 1,339 588 7.876 7.985 24,004,531.54 23,600,000.06 23,642,852.35 100.00% 1,168 739 6.669 6.761 Total Earnings September 30 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year Average Daily Balance Effective Rate of Return Marylou atienzo,rector of Finance Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 12:01 149,270.77 404,823.40 23,850,573.83 24,107,334.73 7.61% 6.66% Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PMI) SymRept V5.02f CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Page 2 Portfolio Details- Investments September 30, 2000 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10183 Argo Federal Savings Bank 04/30/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 578 04/30/2002 10367 American Pacific Bank 03/17/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.950 6.950 169 03/19/2001 10201 Ashbum Bank 05/11/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 222 05/11/2001 10192 Associates National Bank 05/06/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.850 5.850 582 05/06/2002 10410 Bank of Alamo 09/08/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.300 7.300 344 09/10/2001 10306 Bank Star One 12/01/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 60 11/30/2000 10398 Boundary Waters Community Bank 06/30/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.600 274 07/02/2001 10333 BPD International Bank 01/05/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 95 01/04/2001 10312 BankUSA FSB 12/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 81 12/21/2000 10225 Corn Belt B & T Co 06/28/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.200 6.200 270 06/28/2001 10173 Cross Country Bank 04/02/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.580 5.580 183 04/02/2001 10302 Commercial Federal Bank FSB 11/12/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 43 11/13/2000 10417 Citizens Bank 09/29/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 362 09/28/2001 10295 Community National Bank 10/25/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 25 10/26/2000 10174 Corus Bank 04/16/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.450 5.450 562 04/16/2002 10384 Cowlitz Bank 05/08/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 219 05/08/2001 10407 Community Savings Bank 08/31/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 334 08/31/2001 10350 Decatur State Bank 02/03/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.800 6.800 124 02/02/2001 10181 Centennial Bank (Eaton Bank) 04/29/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 211 04/30/2001 10207 Erie State Bank 05/14/1999 99,000,00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.500 5.500 44 11/14/2000 10303 First Bank of Brunswick, The 11/10/1999 99,000.00 99,060.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 39 11/09/2000 10182 First Bank of Richmond SB 04/29/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 575 04/29/2002 10300 First Bank of Turley 11/02/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 31 11/01/2000 10408 First Capital Bank of Kentucky 09/06/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.400 7.400 521 03/06/2002 10388 First Financial Bank 06/02/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.750 7.750 244 06/02/2001 10344 First Enterprise Bank 01/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.800 6.800 114 01/23/2001 10374 First Federal Bank FSB 04/19/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.050 7.050 200 04/19/2001 10414 FNB of Bamesville 09/22/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.300 7.300 541 03/26/2002 10179 FNB of Elk River 04/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 568 04/22/2002' 10209 FNB of Jackson 05/20/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.800 5.881 232 05/21/2001 10313 Franklin Bank & Trust Co 01/04/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 94 01/03/2001 10289 First State Bank 10/15/1999 ' 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.410 6.410 15 10/16/2000 10280 First State Bank of Colfax 09/02/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.300 6.300 93 01/02/2001 10403 First State Bank -Wisconsin 08/17/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.400 7.400 319 08/16/2001 10247 First Suburban National Bank 07/15/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.150 6.150 107 01/16/2001 10401 Signal Bank S (Goodhue County) 07/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 296 07/24/2001 220872DT9 Run Date: 02/14/2001 -12:01 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f CUSIP Investment it Issuer City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2000 Page 3 Average Purchase Stated YTM!C Days to Maturity Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10402 Golden Security Thrift & Loan 07/28/2000 90,000.00 90,000.00 90,000.00 7.500 7.500 300 07/28/2001 10309 Guaranty Bank 12/16/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 75 12/15/2000 10297 Hometown Bank of Villa Rica 11/01/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.641 30 10/31/2000 10412 Hometown Bank 09/19/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.350 7.350 283 07/11/2001 10385 Heritage Bank of Commerce 05/12/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.350 7.350 222 05/11/2001 10310 High Desert State Bank 12/17/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.610 6.610 78 12/18/2000 10311 Home City Federal Savings Bank 12/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.600 6.600 81 12/21/2000 1041542/117391 10178 Insouth Bank 04/21/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 568 04/22/2002 10308 International Bank of Chicago 12/14/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.550 6.550 73 12/13/2000 10351 Ionia County National Bank 02/03/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.800 6.800 124 02/02/2001 10169 Key Bank USA 04/05/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 186 04/05/2001 10290 Lighthouse Community Bank 10/19/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 17 10/18/2000 10343 Leighton State Bank 01/20/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.760 6.760 110 01/19/2001 10368 Lewiston State Bank 03/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.000 7.097 176 03/26/2001 10223 Merrick Banking Corporation 06/21/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.000 6.000 263 06/21/2001 10307' Metter Banking Company 12/07/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.650 6.650 66 12/06/2000 10025 Metropolitan FSB of Cleveland 09/29/1998 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.900 5.900 1 10/0 /2000 10204 Michigan Heritage Bank 05/13/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.700 5.700 589 05/13/2002 10416 Mid -America Bank 09/29/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.200 7.200 365 10/01/2001 10415 Morris State Bank, The 09/27/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.200 7.200 361 09/27/2001 10380 NCB Savings Bank FSB 04/28/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 211 04/30/2001 10292 Northeast Bank 10/08/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.400 6.400 9 10/10/2000 10373 Progrowth Bank (Nicollet S B) 04/04/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.050 7.050 184 04/03/2001 10224 Park Avenue Bank NA, The 06/24/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.050 6.050 267 06/25/2001 10396 Peoples Bank of Kentucky 06/05/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 247 06/05/2001 10304 Planters Bank 11/18/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 47 11/17/2000 10296 Providian National Bank 10/28/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.520 6.520 27 10/28/2000 10177 Queens County Savings Bank 04/20/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.650 5.650 568 04/22/2002 10305 Republic Bank Bountiful 11/23/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.500 6.500 53 11/23/2000 10294 Rocky Mountain B & T Florence 10/20/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.520 6.520 18 10/19/2000 10386 Rushmore State Bank 05/15/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.400 7.400 226 05/15/2001 10193 E*Trade Bank (TeleBank) 05/06/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.860 5.660 400 11/05/2001 10400 Traders Bank 07/11/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.706 283 07/11/2001 10418 Triad Bank 09/29/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.200 7.200 362 09/28/2001 10381 Tumberry Bank 05/03/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 214 05/03/2001 10342 United Credit National Bank 10/12/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 6.600 6.600 10 10/11/2000 Run Date: 02/14/2001 -12:01 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRP_PM2) SymRept V5.02f CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2000 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTMIC Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10389 Universal Savings Bank FSB 05/18/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 319 08/16/2001 10379 Walton Bank & Trust Co 04/20/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.050 7.050 201 04/20/2001 10397 Western Security Bank 06/26/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.600 268 06/26/2001 10196 Winton Savings & Loan 05/07/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 218 05/07/2001 Subtotal and Average 7,238,733.33 7,515,000.00 7,515,000.00 7,515,000.00 6.617 222 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity 066320ZF2 10234 Bankers Trust 05/20/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 6.083 1,327 05/20/2004 10362 Bank of Washington 03/08/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 8.950 6.950 158 03/08/2001 Subtotal and Average 194,000.00 194,000.00 194,000.00 194,000.00 6.526 730 Negotlable/Transferable CDs 0279999X1 10358 American National B & TC 02/18/2000 100,000.00 100,000.00 74,790.18 6.760 15.799 1,594 02/11/2005 06035ADT7 10072 Bank & Trust of Puerto Rico 01/27/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.300 5.300 1,213 01/27/2004 0649999X5 10346 Bank One, Colorado 01/25/2000 100,000.00 100,000.00 74,790.18 6.760 15.798 1,565 01/13/2005 15640XBK6 10158 Centura National Bank 03/09/1999 95,000.00 94,762.50 95,000.00 6.000 6.000 2,169 09/09/2006 203584AD9 10071 Community Bank of Ravenswood 01/28/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.350 5.350 1,214 01/28/2004 10029 Cedar Rapids ECU 10/01/1998 100,000.00 100,000.00 89,576.91 5.650 11.935 0 10/01/2000 258115AV6 10041 Doral FSB 12/10/1998 99,000.00 99,000.00 98,384.22 5.350 5.493 1,165 12/10/2003 29874FA32 10134 European American Bank 02/04/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,403 08/04/2004 w 10031 Farmers Bank 10/02/1998 100,000.00 75,948.98 75,948.98 5.650 13.769 1,096 10/02/2003 30241HXE3 10159 FCC National Bank 03/10/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.700 5.700 1,256 03/10/2004 33847EGE1 10205 Flagstar Bank 05/14/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 590 05/14/2002 32109VAH7 10203 FNB of Lucedale 05/12/1999 97,000.00 95,402.41 97,000.00 5.500 5.500 589 05/13/2002 10195 FNB of America 05/08/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 582 05/06/2002 356611 FU2060 10168 Fremont Investment & Loan 04/07/1999 97,000.00 93,911.52 97,000.00 5.600 5.600 1,284 04/07/2004 10324 First Bank & Trust 04/28/1999 100,000.00 85,276.39 85,276.39 5.750 12.530 587 04/21/2002 10325 First Union Bank 02/23/1999 100,000.00 84,801.52 84,801.52 5.820 12.683 538 03/23/2002 397398S36060 10162 Greenwood Trust Company DE 03/17/1999 100,000.00 96,862.00 100,000.00 5.600 5.600 1,263 03/17/2004, 10262 Great South Texas Bank 09/15/1999 100,000.00 76,811.23 75,811.23 6.550 15.190 1,396 07/28/2004 10037 Hometown Bank NA 11/20/1998 100,000.00 85,328.46 85,328.46 5.650 12.402 372 10/08/2001 441800AY8060 10167 Household Bank 04/07/1999 97,000.00 97,000.00 97,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,284 04/07/2004 44921CBN6 10042 IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co 12/23/1998 95,000.00 94,762.50 95,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,178 12/23/2003 45383NAQ4 10160 Independent Bank W Michigan 03/15/1999 95,000,00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 5.999 1,250 03/04/2004 47816HAB3 10161 Johnson Bank 03/17/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.250 6.250 3,089 03/17/2009 51803KG35 10078 Lasalle Bank NA 01/25/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 6.000 4,864 01/25/2014 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 12:01 CUSIP Average Investment# Issuer Balance City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2000 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Page 5 Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Negotiable/Transferable CDs 51803AVL0 531554AG8 509685AC7 55256NKS2 564759LT3 55262W W R3080 59020WDF5 64880TGC5060 685621CW2060 680061BK3 710198GA4 743838TD0 82661YAG8 82668FCS4 798219AB7060 856284GL2060 853389CG7060 789369HG3 8649999X9 90331V9X2 959897EA3 10327 Lasalle Bank NA 10166 Libertyville Bank & Trust 10185 Lake Forest Bank & Trust 10077 M & I Marshall & lisley Bank 10152 Manufacturers & Traders Trust 10151 MBNA America 10216 Mani!! Lynch Bank USA 10329 Bank of Mount Vernon 10038 Nations Bank (Bamett Bank) 10136 New South Federal Savings Bank 10034 Orchard Federal Savings Bank 10076 Old National Bank 10133 Peoples Bank 10341 Pony Express Bank 10043 Provident Bank 10339 Signal Bank N A 10137 Signet Bank 10146 San Jose National Bank 10263 South Bay Bank 10135 State Bank of India 10164 Standard Federal Bank 10075 St Francis Bank FSB 10347 Success National Bank 10281 Upstate National Bank 10353 US Bank NA 10150 Western Bank PR 10332 Wilmington Trust Co Subtotal and Average 4,611,672.54 02/03/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 49,892.25 8.210. 24.665 3,859 04/26/2011 04/06/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,272 03/26/2004 04/06/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,272 03/26/2004 01/27/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 94,818.55 6.050 6.076 3,040 01/27/2009 03/04/1999 95,000.00 94,762.50 93,114.92 5.500 5.847 1,972 02/24/2006 03/03/1999 97,000.00 94,404.28 97,000.00 5.400 5.400 883 03/03/2003 05/27/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,339 06/01/2004 02/26/1999 100,000.00 69,971.36 69,971.36 6.550 15.910 1,809 09/14/2005 12/01/1998 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.850 5.850 1,036 08/03/2003 02/23/1999 97,000.00 94,818.47 97,000.00 5.300 5.299 680 08/12/2002 11/04/1998 99,000.00 81,132.48 99,000.00 5.750 5.750 1,129 11/04/2003 01/28/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 94,772.00 6.000 6.032 3,041 01/28/2009 02/10/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,409 08/10/2004 10/13/1999 100,000.00 65,799.53 65,799.53 7.240 21.020 1,540 12/19/2004 01/21/1999 99,000.00 95,269.68 99,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,389 07/21/2004 11/02/1998 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,249.24 6.500 6.432 1,046 08/13/2003 03/01/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 97,886.10 6.250 - 5.500 1,123 10/29/2003 03/03/1999 97,000.00 93,399.36 97,000.00 5.400 5.400 1,249 03/03/2004 07/26/1999 100,000.00 88,986.23 88,986.23 6.180 13.125 298 07/26/2001 02/12/1999 97,000.00 95,146.33 98,658.70 5.850 5.405 1,003 07/01/2003 03/19/1999 97,000.00 94,693.34 97,000.00 5.850 5.850 1,265 03/19/2004 01/29/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 94,525.00 6.000 6.067 3,042 01/29/2009 01/31/2000 100,000.00 100,000.00 79,937.85 6.270 14.114 1,217 01/31/2004 10/05/1999 100,000.00 78,963.99 78,963.99 6.570 14.890 1,118 10/24/2003 02/04/2000 100,000.00 74,008.71 74,008.71 7.020 16.505 1,586 02/03/2005 03/03/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.400 5.400 702 09/03/2002 03/08/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 78,570.64 6.150 14.182 1,243 02/26/2004 4,962,000.00 4,704,223.77 4,593,863.14 8.148 1,394 Federal Agency Securities 31331RK38060 31331HXXOC 31331HXU6 313318R66 3133M6J25C 3133M6KY3C Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 12:01 10124 10273 10282 10382 10054 10055 Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank 11/24/1998 07/30/1999 07/27/1999 05/02/2000 11/25/1998 11/25/1998 250,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 150,000.00 150,000.00 244,130.00 99,305.50 98,840.00 99,983.20 146,084.55 146,696.70 250,000.00 5.800 100,000.00 6.250 100,000.00 6.380 100,000.00 7.000 150,000.00 5.825 150,000.00 6.000 5.800 1,149 11/24/2003 6.250 484 01/28/2002 6.380 848 01/27/2003 7.000 578 05/02/2002 5.825 1,150 11/25/2003 6.000 1,150 11/25/2003 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f . CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Page 6 Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2000 Average Purchase Stated YTWC Days to Maturity Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Securities 3133M6N79C 10057 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/01/1998 100,000.00 97,635.70 100,000.00 5.930 5.930 1,156 12/01/2003 3133M67V0C 10059 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/22/1998 100,000.00 96,940.20 100,000.00 5.680 5.660 1,177 12/22/2003 3133M6W38C 10060 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/23/1998 100,000.00 97,065.90 100,000.00 5.710 5.710 1,178 12123/2003 3133M6GQ5 10063 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/17/1998 100,000.00 97,469.00 100,000.00 5.785 5.785 1,142 11/17/2003 3133M6NC8 10065 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/01/1998 100,000.00 97,719.00 100,000.00 5.910 5.910 1,156 12/01/2003 3133M6PS1 10066 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/10/1998 100,000.00 98,719.00 100,000.00 5.780 5.780 617 06/10/2002 3133M6NX2 10067 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/04/1998 100,000.00 97,844.00 100,000.00 5.970 5.970 1,159 12/04/2003 3134A2D39 10068 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/22/1998 100,000.00 97,469.00 100,000.00 5.820 5.820 1,177 12/22/2003 3133M6K98 10069 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/25/1998 100,000.00 98,157.00 100,000.00 5.640 5.640 785 11/25/2002 3133M6MP0060 10118 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/02/1998 100,000.00 98,313.00 100,000.00 5.770 5.770 792 12/02/2002 3133M6PD4060 10119 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/04/1998 100,000.00 97,625.00 100,000.00 5.875 5.875 1,159 12/04/2003 3133M8P69080 10120 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/04/1998 100,000.00 97,906.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,159 12/04/2003 3133M6Q68060 10121 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/09/1998 125,000.00 123,047.50 125,000.00 5.860 5.860 799 12/09/2002 3133M6PX0060 10128 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/02/1998 125,000.00 121,836.25 125,000.00 5.795 5.795 1,157 12/02/2003 3133M7KY1080 10144 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/24/1999 150,000.00 147,201.00 150,000.00 5.250 5.250 1,241 02/24/2004 3133M7U46 10157 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/15/1999 100,000.00 97,766.00 100,000.00 8.000 6.000 1,261 03/15/2004 3133M85N0 10170 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/18/1999 100,000.00 98,372.90 100,000.00 6.050 6.050 898 03/18/2003 3133M7XW1C 10171 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/23/1999 100,000.00 98,496.40 100,000.00 5.940 5.940 722 09/23/2002 3133M8N83C 10202 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/12/1999 100,000.00 98,020.00 100,000.00 5.740 5.740 772 11/12/2002 as 3133M8UA0 10210 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/24/1999 100,000.00 98,656.00 100,000.00 5.685 5.685 600 05/24/2002 ,, 3133M8T38 10211 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/24/1999 250,000.00 244,765.00 250,000.00 6.185 6.185 1,331 05/24/2004 • 3134A3SQ0C 10212 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999 100,000.00 98,786.70 100,000.00 6.000 8.000 603 05/27/2002 3133M8SD7C 10213 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999 100,000.00 98,318.60 100,000.00 5.930 5.930 787 11/27/2002 3133M8SW5C 10214 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999 100,000.00 98,281.60 100,000.00 5.910 5.910 787 11/27/2002 3133M8SD7 10215 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/1999 100,000.00 98,090.00 100,000.00 5.930 5.930 787 11/27/2002 3133M8UT9 10227 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/03/1999 100,000.00 98,719.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 793 12/03/2002 3133M8V92C 10228 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/09/1999 100,000.00 98,445.60 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 799 12/09/2002 3133M8ZP2C 10230 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/24/1999 100,000.00 99,070.20 100,000.00 6.250 6.250 631 06/24/2002 3133M6J33060 10239 Federal Home Loan Bank 11/24/1998 115,000.00 111,945.60 115,000.00 5.730 5.730 1,149 11/24/2003 3133M94LC3 10240 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/1999 100,000.00 99,311.30 100,000.00 6.140 6.140 442 12/17/2001 3133M94L3 10242 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/1999 100,000.00 99,410.00 100,000.00 6.140 6.140 442 12/17/2001 3133M9C42 10265 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/13/1999 100,000.00 99,312.00 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 1,381 07/13/2004 3133M9A85 10266 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/09/1999 100,000.00 99,220.00 . 100,000.00 6.200 6.200 646 07/09/2002 3133M90D1 10267 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/28/1999 100,000.00 99,310.00 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 1,396 07/28/2004 3133M9BJ0C 10270 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/12/1999 100,000.00 99,402.90 100,000.00 6.020 8.020 284 07/12/2001 3133M9090 10271 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/19/1999 100,000.00 99,411.80 100,000.00 6.040 6.040 291 07/19/2001. Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 02/14/2001 •12:01 CUSIP Investment # Issuer City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2000 Page 7 Average Purchase Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Federal Agency Securities 3133M9FX5C 10272 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133M9NW8 10279 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133M9A85 10280 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133M9KU5 10284 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133M9NW8 10285 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133M6CK7 10286 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MAGZ6 10334 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MAGZ60 10335 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MAQ28 10354 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MAP52C 10355 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MAVF3 10359 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133M9J45 10360 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MAX95 10364 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133M8AA5 10375 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MBAX5 10376 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MBAA5 10377 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MBBZ9 10378 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MBL54 10390 Federal Home Loan Bank 00 3133M6AW8 10399 Federal Home Loan Bank cA. 3133M5PZ7 10404 Federal Home Loan Bank 3133MBXF9C 10405 Federal Home Loan Bank a 3133MC4Z5 10413 Federal Home Loan Bank 3134A2D39 10048 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A2D39C 10058 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A2G93060 10122 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A2L22060 10123 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A3CT1 10155 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A3CT1 10156 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A3HG4C 10172 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A3NM4 10191 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A3PA8C 10200 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3134A3ZM1 10276 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 312902HA0C 10298 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 3133TGSG5 10301 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 312902XD6 10391 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 312902YK9C 10392 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 12:01 07/29/1999 100,000.00 99,104.00 100,000.00 6.340 6.340 666 07/29/2002 08/25/1999 100,000.00 99,719.00 100,000.00 6.540 6.540 512 02/25/2002. 07/10/1999 100,000.00 98,820.00 100,000.00 6.200 8.200 646 07/09/2002 08/16/1999 100,000.00 99,660.00 100,000.00 6.030 6.030 138 02/16/2001 08/25/1999 100,000.00 99,780.00 100,000.00 6.540 6.540 512 02/25/2002 07/30/1999 200,000.00 198,140.00 198,400.00 6.060 6.431 442 12/17/2001 01/10/2000 100,000.00 99,460.00 100,000.00 7.020 7.020 831 01/10/2003 01/10/2000 100,000.00 99,701.60 100,000.00 7.020 7.020 831 01/10/2003 02/15/2000 100,000.00 99,850.00 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 502 02/15/2002 02/14/2000 100,000.00 99,859.90 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 502 02/15/2002 02/28/2000 100,000.00 100,125.00 100,000.00 7.115 7.115 515 02/28/2002 08/16/1999 100,000.00 99,380.00 100,000.00 6.060 6.060 319 08/16/2001 03/06/2000 100,000.00 99,820.00 100,000.00 7.015 7.112 340 09/06/2001 04/12/2000 100,000.00 99,864.60 100,000.00 7.030 7.030 558 04/12/2002 04/12/2000 100,000.00 99,900.00 100,000.00 7.115 7.115 558 04/12/2002 04/12/2000 100,000.00 99,969.00 100,000.00 7.030 7.030 558 04/12/2002 04/18/2000 100,000.00 99,990.00 100,000.00 7.125 7.125 564 04/18/2002 06/06/2000 100,000.00 100,316.70 100,000.00 7.500 7.500 613 06/06/2002 07/05/2000 300,000.00 301,680.42 300,375.42 4.910 6.199 40 11/10/2000 08/17/2000 100,000.00 100,560.17 99,314.77 5.700 7.171 729 09/30/2002 08/22/2000 100,000.00 99,989.40 100,000.00 7.030 7.030 689 08/21/2002 09/19/2000 100,000.00 99,792.10 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 718 09/19/2002 12/22/1998 100,000.00 97,109.00 100,000.00 5.820 5.820 1,177 12/22/2003 12/22/1998 100,000.00 97,381.20 100,000.00 5.820 5.820 1,177 12/22/2003 01/05/1999 200,000.00 195,688.00 200,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,191 01/05/2004 01/06/1999 150,000.00 147,891.00 150,000.00 6.000 6.000 827 01/06/2003 03/08/1999 150,000.00 147,516.00 150,000.00 6.300 6.300 1,254 03/08/2004 03/08/1999 150,000.00 147,645.00 150,000.00 6.300 6.300 1,254 03/08/2004 04/07/1999 100,000.0D 98,249.80 100,000.00 6.000 8.000 918 04/07/2003 05/03/1999 100,000.00 97,812.00 100,000.00 6.105 6.105 1,310 05/03/2004 05/10/1999 100,000.00 97,662.30 100,000.00 6.140 6.140 1,317 05/10/2004 07/20/1999 100,000.00 99,422.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.000 292 07/20/2001 10/28/1999 100,000.00 100,001.70 100,000.00 7.010 7.010 757 10/28/2002 12/01/1998 100,000.00 89,085.00 100,000.00 6.000 6.083 1,034 08/01/2003 05/17/2000 100,000.00 100,156.00 100,000.00 7.150 7.150 593 05/17/2002 05/30/2000 150,000.00 150,137.40 150,000.00 7.610 7.810 425 11/30/2001 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f CUSIP Investment # Federal Agency Securities 10393 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10395 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10411 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10056 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10062 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10114 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10143 Federal Nab. Mortgage Assoc. 10145 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10189 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10190 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10229 Federal Nail. Mortgage Assoc. 10231 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10269 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10277 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10349 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10274 Sallie Mae Agency Bond 10278 Sallie Mae Agency Bond Subtotal and Average 11,501,971.18 312902YK9 312902YR4 3134A2ZQ4 31364GHP7C 31364GDH9 31364GDH9080 31364GTC3 31364GWN5 31364GJ83 31364GJ83C 31364GY37 31364GX38 31364G3C1 31364G4L0 31364CUT3 86387R2H4C 86387R2P6 Issuer Average Balance City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2000 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Page 8 Stated YTMIC Days to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Pass Through Securities 313401TF6010 31341SZX2060 31341RVL4060 31341RDX8010 31341PFR3060 313401 WX5060 31282NAG8060 31341UZL3060 313610EQ6060 313618N51 31361T4J0060 31364TKP5060 31376PGY5 36216XMV0020 36217EBM3020 36202AXN2020 10093 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10094 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10095 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10096 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10097 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10099 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10116 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10406 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10092 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10098 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10102 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10103 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10126 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 10079 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10080 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10083 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 05/30/2000 05/30/2000 09/12/2000 11/25/1998 10/22/1998 10/22/1998 02/18/1999 03/02/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999 06/23/1999 06/17/1999 07/21/1999 08/05/1999 01/28/2000 08/10/1999 08/24/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 85,000.00 100,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 100,000.00 250,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,188.00 100,186.00 83,622.58 97,891.70 245,625.00 244,820.00 96,682.00 243,397.50 97,750.00 97,382.40 99,344.00 99,286.00 99,542.00 99,657.00 99,660.00 99,335.80 99,746.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 85,150.90 100,000.00 250,000.00 250,000.00 99,500.00 250,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,375.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 11,050,000,00 10,898,431.37 11,047,118.09 7.610 7.600 6.000 6.020 6.040 6.040 5.500 6.020 6.020 6.020 6.000 8.000 6.000 6.170 6.700 6.000 6.300 7.610 7.600 6.423 8.020 6.040 6.040 5.616 6.020 6.020 6.020 6.000 6.000 6.000 6.170 7.043 6.000 6.300 425 11/30/2001 425 11/30/2001 1,165 12/10/2003 1,150 11/25/2003 1,116 10/22/2003 1,116 10/22/2003 1,235 02/18/2004 1,248 03/02/2004 1,300 04/23/2004 1,303 04/26/2004 263 06/21/2001 261 06/19/2001 296 07/24/2001 310 08/07/2001 480 01/24/2002 313 08/10/2001 327 08/24/2001 6.255 822 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 10/30/1998 08/22/2000 12/23/1997 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 12/01/1998 08/26/1997 08/26/1997 10/15/1997 1,589.30 4,737.18 6,028.38 3,120.06 1,485.06 3,088.77 705.92 54,512.00 5,157.08 4,988.17 2,199.61 1,908.94 50,720.33 3,038.81 1,509.62 4,906.15 1,585.30 4,740.70 6,037.54 3,124.79 1,484.63 3,140.89 708.32 55,439.29 5,276.14 5,082.87 2,250.39 1,905.87 51,800.67 3,124.75 1,552.31 4,995.84 1,668.79 4,920.81 6,262.10 3,245.03 1,574.30 3,189.22 736.81 54,767.25 5,328.02 5,154.48 2,287.67 1,975.76 52,861.03 3,151.93 1,585.82 5,090.21 10.000 9.000 9,000 9.000 10.500 8.500 12.000 8.000 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.250 8.500 8.500 8.500 8.500 7.745 7.495 7.514 7.412 7.807 7.359 10.965 12.477 7.494 7.107 6.967 7.307 6.626 6.671 6.727 7.361 151 03/01/2001 396 11/01/2001 365 10/01/2001 335 09/01/2001 151 03/01/2001 457 01/01/2002 61 12/01/2000 516 03/01/2002 547 04/01/2002 457 01/01/2002 488 02/01/2002 1,492 11/01/2004 1,003 07/01/2003 379 10/15/2001 440 12/15/2001 445 12/20/2001 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 12:01 CUSIP Investment # Issuer City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments September 30, 2000 Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Page 9 Stated YTMIC Days to Maturity Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 385 Maturity Date Pass Through Securities 36202AX77020 10084 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/21/1997 7,445.28 7,581.39 7,724.48 8.500 7.495 476 01/20/2002 36217LQ02020 10085 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/30/1997 11,175.16 11,491.20 11,601.42 8.500 6.657 471 01/15/2002 36216TKS8020 10086 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/30/1997 5,080.78 5,224.47 5,271.34 8.500 7.329 318 08/15/2001 36218VV059020 10087 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/12/1997 5,540.15 5,696.83 5,768.84 8.500 6.685 714 09/15/2002 36217AUE8020 10088 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/12/1997 9,468.03 9,688.09 9,781.85 8.000 6.424 530 03/15/2002 36202AYQ4020 10090 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/21/1997 11,458.05 11,609.78 11,830.58 8.000 7.239 507 02/20/2002 36202A5C7020 10091 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/25/1997 8,932.83 9,096.13 9,267.93 8.500 7.000 719 09/20/2002 36215SQ55020 10100 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 02/18/1998 2,264.42 2,269.39 2,414.60 9.000 7.767 231 05/20/2001 36215N3C6020 10104 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 7,410.92 7,427.77 7,744.44 9.000 6.220 226 05/15/2001 36216NJL8020 10105 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 7,329.66 7,370.05 7,668.75 9.000 7.549 410 11/15/2001 36202A2B2020 10106 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 8,422.39 8,448.38 8,643.61 7.500 8.957 596 05/20/2002 3621614N8020 10107 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 6,855.78 6,908.45 7,181.51 9.000 7.483 410 11/15/2001 362161D75020 10108 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/26/1998 6,610.51 6,661.29 6,875.04 9.000 7.150 440 12/15/2001 36217LVM5020 10109 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 12,875.52 13,174.77 13,294.00 8.000 6.352 530 03/15/2002 36218NZQ7020 10110 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 8,006.56 8,192.65 8,286.84 8.000 6.344 652 07/15/2002 36202AZU4020 10111 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 10,572.48 10,765.76 11,165.61 8.500 7.513 566 04/20/2002 36202AW52020 10238 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/21/1997 4,407.64 4,488.22 4,573.05 8.500 6.624 415 11/20/2001 Subtotal and Average 304,196.78 283,531.54 288,344.92 292,873.12 7.985 588 23,850,573.83 24,004,531.54 23,600,000.06 23,642,852.35 8.761 739 Total Investments and Average Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 12:01 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f SymPro CUSP City of National City Activity Report Sorted By Brokers September 1, 2000 - September 30, 2000 Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Sales/Calls/Maturities Ending Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance City of National City Par Value Brokers: Finance 500 Inc Certificates of Deposit - Monthly Subtotal and Balance 383,000.00 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity 383,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 95,000.00 95,000.00 NegotiablelTransferable CDs 10040 Royal Bank of Pennsylvania Subtotal and Balance 3,888,000.00 Federal Agency Securities 3134A2ZQ4 10411 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Subtotal and Balance 5.550 09/08/2000 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 3,788,000.00 6.000 09/12/2000 85,000.00 0.00 1,500,000.00 85,000.00 0.00 1,585,000.00 Pass Through Securities Subtotal and Balance 50,720.33 Brokers Subtotal 24.586% 5,916,720.33 Brokers: Gilford Securities Inc 85,000.00 50,720.33 100,000.00 5,901,720.33 Federal Agency Securities 3133MAX38C 10363 Federal Home Loan Bank 7.185 09/06/2000 0.00 100,000.00 6.500 09/27/2000 0.00 100,000.b0 3133MB2Y2C 10371 Federal Home Loan Bank 8.000 09/12/2000 0.00 100,000.00 312902ZD4C 10394 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 8.000 09/12/2000 100,000.00 0.00 3133MC4Z5 10413 Federal Home Loan Bank Subtotal and Balance 3,650,000.00 100,000.00 300,000.00 3,450,000.00 100,000.00 300,000.00 3,450,009.00 Brokers Subtotal 14.372% 3,650,000.00 Brokers: Multi -Bank Securities Inc Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 13:17 CUSIP City of National City Activity Report September 1, 2000 September 30, 2000 Par Value Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Sales/Calls/Maturities Ending Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 2 Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10027 Capital One FSB 5.793 09/29/2000 0.00 100,000.00 10414 FNB of Barnesville 7.300 09/22/2000 99,000.00 0.00 10416 Mid -America Bank - 7.200 09/29/2000 99,000.00 0.00 Subtotal and Balance 300,000.00 198,000.00 100,000.00 398,000.00 Negotiable/Transferable CDs Subtotal and Balance 1,074,000.00 1,074,000.00 Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 1,665,000.00 1,665,000.00 Pass Through Securities 36216XMV0020 10079 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/20/2000 0.00 279.65 36217EBM3020 10080 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/20/2000 0.00 267.85 36202AXN2020 10083 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/22/2000 0.00 588.59 36202AX77020 10084 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/22/2000 0.00 557.48 36217LQQ2020 10085 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/20/2000 0.00 709.47 36216TKS8020 10086 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/20/2000 0.00 460.50 36218VD59020 10087 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/20/2000 0.00 243.82 36217AUE8020 10088 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 09/20/2000 0.00 495.34 CK 36202AYQ4020 10090 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 09/22/2000 0.00 763.27 36202A5C7020 10091 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/22/2000 0.00 390.70 313610EQ6060 10092 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/25/2000 0.00 1,118.40 313401TF8010 10093 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10.000 09/18/2000 0.00 476.59 31341SZX2060 10094 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 9.000 09/18/2000 0.00 570.94 31341 RVL4060 10095 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 9.000 09/18/2000 0.00 594.06 31341 RDX8010 10096 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 9.000 09/18/2000 0.00 193.13 31341 PFR3060 10097 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 10.500 09/18/2000 0.00 179.81 31361SN51 10098 Federal Na0. Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/25/2000 0.00 312.09 313401 WX5060 10099 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 8.500 09/18/2000 0.00 227.64 36215SQ55020 10100 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 09/22/2000 0.00 366.22 31361T4J0060 10102 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/25/2000 0.00 221.99 31364TKP5060 10103 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 8.250 09/25/2000 0.00 425.94 36215N3C6020 10104 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 09/20/2000 0.00 1,289.46 36216NJL8020 10105 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 09/20/2000 0.00 719.21 36202A2B2020 10106 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 7.500 09/22/2000 0.00 506.29 3621614N8020 10107 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 09/20/2000 0.00 560.20 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 13:17 CUSIP City of National City Activity Report September 1, 2000 - September 30, 2000 Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Sales/Calls/Maturitles Ending Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Par Value Page 3 Brokers: Multi -Bank Securities Inc Pass Through Securities 362161 DT5020 10108 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 09/20/2000 0,00 493.06 36217LVM5020 10109 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 09/20/2000 0.00 721.79 36218NZQ7020 10110 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 09/20/2000 0.00 425.54 36202AZU4020 10111 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 09/22/2000 0.00 707.492.000 09/18/2000 0.00 526.37 31282NAG8060 10116 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 18.500 09/22/2000 0.00 1,030.44 36202AW52020 10236 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. Subtotal and Balance 249,234.54 0.00 16,423.33 232,811.21 Brokers Subtotal 14.038% 3,288,234.54 198,000.00 118,423.33 3,369,811.21 Brokers: Mischler Financial Group Inc Federal Agency Securities 3133MB3U9 10369 Federal Home Loan Bank 7.050 09/29/2000 Subtotal and Balance 1,950,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 7.707% 1,950,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 1,850,000.00 100,000.00 1,850,000.00 • Brokers: Morgan Keegan Federal Agency Securities • 3133M8BD5 10361 Federal Home Loan Bank Subtotal and Balance Brokers Subtotal 2.500% 700,000.00 700,000.00 5.170 09/25/2000 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 600,000.00 100,000.00 600,000.00 Brokers: PaineWebber Inc Federal Agency Securities 3133MB4P9 10372 Federal Home Loan Bank Subtotal and Balance Brokers Subtotal 2.916% Brokers: U.S. Sterling Capital Corp. 7.000 - 09/28/2000 800,000.00 800,000.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 700,000.00 100,000.00 700,000.00 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 13:17 CUSIP City of National City Activity Report September 1, 2000 - September 30, 2000 Par Value Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Sales/Calls/Maturities Ending Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Page 4 Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10261 Community Bank of New Jersey 6.350 09/29/2000 0.00 10264 Triad Bank 6.450 09/30/2000 0.00. 10408 First Capital Bank of Kentucky 7.400 09/06/2000 99,000.00 10410 Bank of Alamo 7.300 09/08/2000 99,000.00 10412 Hometown Bank 7.350 09/19/2000 99,000.00 10415 Morris State Bank, The 7.200 09/27/2000 99,000.00 10417 Citizens Bank 7.250 09/29/2000 99,000.00 10418 Triad Bank 7.200 09/29/2000 99,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 6,338,000.00 594,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 198,000.00 6,734,000.00 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity Subtotal and Balance 99,000.00 99,000.00 Negotiable/Transferable CDs Subtotal and Balance 100,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 28.882% 6,537,000.00 594,000.00 100,000.00 198,000.00 6,933,000.00 Brokers: Vining -Sparks IBG Federal Agency Securities 3133MAUK3 10365 Federal Home Loan Bank 7.075 09/06/2000 0.00 100,000.00 3133MAXZ7 10366 Federal Home Loan Bank 7.050 09/13/2000 0.00 100,000.00 3133MB3F2 10370 Federal Home Loan Bank 6.500 09/27/2000 0.00 100,000.00 300,000.00 1,200,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 1,500,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 4.999% 1,500,000.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 1,200,000.00 Total 100.000% 24,341,954.87 Run Date: 02/14/2001 - 13:17 977,000.00 1,314,423.33 24,004,531.54 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.02f FUND NUMBER 001 103 106 107 108 109 110 113 115 120 125 126 130 131 136 145 154 157 158 159 169 171 172 173 174 176 179 183 189 190 191 195 196 197 198 199 200 203 205 208 209 211 212 214 303 304 307 308 312 315 343 363 552 627 629 630 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CONSOLIDATED CASH REPORT ALL FUNDS SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FUND TITLE GENERAL FUND GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND GRANT -CA LITERACY CAMPAIGN RETIREMENT FUND LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY GAS TAXES FUND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUND CULTURAL ARTS FUND PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND SEWER SERVICE FUND FIRE DEPT ACTIVITIES FUND EMT-D REVOLVING FUND ASSET FORFEITURE FUND TINY TOT CLASSES FUND JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND GRANT-SUPPL. LAW ENF. (SLESF) SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE GRANT -LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND LITERACY INITIATIVES VI CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1303 GRANT - STOP PROJECT LANDSCAPE RESERVE CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT RESER PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1304 PARK SECURITY/GTE LEASE YOUTH SERVICES MATERIALS GRANT FY99-00 SUPP. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND EVERY 15 MINUTES GRANT FY1999-2000 CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND PROPOSITION A" FUND GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY FY98 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP SECURITY & FIRE ALARM REGULATION FUND TDA LIABILITY INS. FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION /. Cyf 19 ENDING BALANCE 5,320,839.93 264,511.68 876.09 489.16 88,007.09 1,286,520.53 40,000.00 75,000.00 12,778.15 44,336.47 11,748,126.48 248.11 180,751.77 161,394.51 10,445.57 8,877.44 92,211.51 112,159.06 25,584.00 143,820.12 1,246.32 10,495.19 311,002.84 7,106.57 13,290.20 19,176.70 614.65 1,991.68 929,371.66 528,315.11 85,720.31 488,705.84 705,300.02 50,000.00 14,423.32 54,832.00 580,672.50 28,000.00 0.57 21,237.68 86,578.51 54,782.38 100,000.00 2,833.95 299,571.00 100,000.00 1,461,585.30 106,942.12 417,821.25 33,189.00 37,728.25 35,972.50 33,519.57 3,724,112.96 103,384.46 1,351,128.11 I-UNU FUND TITLE ciwuvu NUMBER BALANCE 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 175,950.27 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 577,724.89 719 1911 ACT IMPROVEMENT BONDS 1,424.52 721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 50,611.98 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 32,223,341.85 lbistft9 MONTHLY STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS FOR THE MONTH ENDING SEPTEMBER FUND FUND TITLE SEPTEMBER YTD.SEP NUMBER 001 GENERAL FUND 1,941,498.32 7,133,431.19 103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 0.00 46,363.94 104 LIBRARY FUND 6,432.98 12,990.12 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 7,496.06 15,136.80 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,305.77 14,080.98 109 GAS TAXES FUND 185,543.88 169,277.49 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 10,923.16 10,923.16 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 626.00 1,076.00 120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 8,804.36 15,395.89 123 GRANT -FAMILIES FOR LITERACY 11,000.00 11,000.00 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 394,983.20 1,264,386.35 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 0.00 8,179.20 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 25,959.20 25,415.71 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 48,044.00 41,054.80 147 GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM 0.00 17,006.00 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 795.50. 25,788.50 169 GRANT -LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK 0.00 (18.39) 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 0.00 5,281.15 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 0.00 33,570.70 176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME 6,475.98 2,447.61 185 COPS MORE 97-CM-WX-0949 0.00 111,120.00 188 GRANT - HIDTA 0.00 24,498.64 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1303 8,518.30 8,518.30 191 GRANT - STOP PROJECT 3,375.00 97,327.05 192 LEASE ESCROW FUND 3,700.89 11,147.24 199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 0.00 77,667.00 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1304 -9,789.03 (9,789.03) 201 NCJPFA DEBT SERVICE FUND 359,879.37 359,883.61 204 GALE GRANT 0.00 9,731.66 209 FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII 75,977.00 101,387.00 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 3,433.75 10,648.75 214 EVERY 15 MINUTES GRANT FY1999-2000 0.00 2,833.95 301 GRANT-C.D.B.G. 0.00 (211,214.12) 302 CDC PAYMENTS 60,250.68 (196,566.10) 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 0.00 33,881.12 312 STP LOCALITRANSNET HIGHWAY 0.00 (6,110.96) 314 OTS GRANT 22,851.72 22,851.72 343 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP 0.00 (555.64) 347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT 0.00 92,617.00 552 TDA 133,137.48 426,884.69 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 71,044.11 208,623.56 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 0.00 (2,664.00) 721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 0.00 (745.58) TOTAL ALL FUNDS 3,385,267.68 10,024,763.06 2/14/01 /I 9 IMBTINTFO1RPAIIENTS 2/14/01 Fu001N0 GENERAL FUND FUND TITLE 1,532,572 86SEPTEMBER 3,885,595.48 104 LIBRARY FUND 50,171.49 161,264.35 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 45,341.67 125,097.85 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 579.95 2,985.04 109 GAS TAXES FUND 7,540.80 30,271.98 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 8,983.68 16,965.08 112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND 7,269.65 17,609.34 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND (97.16) (97.16) 123 GRANT -FAMILIES FOR LITERACY 1,299.30 3,620.90 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 55,238.65 1,254,411.98 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 18,985.20 18,985.20 147 GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM 6,174.86 15,289.47 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 7,131.02 9,510.65 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 11,291.20 11,448.90 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 2,486.87 4,907.10 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT 1,700.81 4,952.38 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 5,915.40 17,340.61 179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND 0.00 200.00 182 COPS GRANT PART II 8,345.18 24,325.84 188 GRANT - HIDTA 3,822.05 17,873.66 189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 1,310.17 2,220.17 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND -1303 0.00 478.06 191 GRANT - STOP PROJECT 8,449.38 23,331.58 192 LEASE ESCROW FUND 3,700.89 32,203.31 193 COPS GRANT PART III 3,242.54 6,250.00 195 LANDSCAPE RESERVE 0.00 1,563.33 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 4,000.00 4,000.00 198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE 1,200.40 1,200.40 199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 0.00 22,835.00 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1304 0.00 5,794.14 201 NCJPFA DEBT SERVICE FUND 0.09 0.26 204 GALE GRANT 0.00 350.00 208 FY99 00 SUPP. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) 28,064.57 48,267.69 209 FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII 289.36 126.36 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 2,625.52 7,317.40 218 HIHG INTENSITY PREVENTION ZONE 14,905.23 28,905.23 301 GRANT-C.D.B.G. 51,201.61 111,934.04 302 CDC PAYMENTS 33,047.04 88,511.73 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 7,870.28 52,201.49 308 GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB 49.14 49.14 313 GRANT-CMAQ 1,148.66 1,306.72 347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT 5,421.51 6,765.01 348 STATE GRANT 666.48 947.72 552 TDA 166,146.72 547,060.73 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 177,042.92 372,596.42 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 47,474.52 397,927.36 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 19,867.05 29,897.25 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 45,920.17 91,188.35 630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 60,309.71 129,332.35 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 18,658.15 25,008.72 632 INFORMATION SERVICES 28,618.52 73,756.37 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 56,296.96 152,595.30 718 TRUST & AGENCY 1,794.03 7,287.85 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 2,564,075.10 7,895,768.13 lc tot City of National City Pooled Investment Transactions Report For the Month of September 2000 Date Description Institution Ref. No. Amount Beginning Balance 6,866,405.41 19 Withdrawal LAIF 876838 (300,000.00) 25 Deposit LAIF 770477 1,000,000.00 28 Withdrawal LAIF 433115 (300,000.00) Ending Balance 7,266,405.41 19 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 27, 2001 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. (-ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Joceill Cheek PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CMCPARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Joceill Cheek arises from an occurrence on January 28, 2001 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on February 9, 2001. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 / ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Simone Johnson PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CMCSE PARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Simone Johnson arises from an occurrence on December 18, 2000 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on February 5, 2001. / Environmental Review XX N/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A A-200 (9/80) Account No. Resolution No. ITEM #9 2/27/01 711 A Avenue National City, CA 91950.2228 Business: 619 477-9339 Fax: 619 477-5018 E-mail: nccc@cvhsa.com Web site: www.nationalcitychamber.org February 15, 2001 Mayor George Waters and Members of the City Council City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Gentlemen: The National City Chamber of Commerce is sponsoring a Workshop on the Energy Crisis for business owners on Thursday, April 26, 2001 from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. We have reserved the large hall at the National City Community Building. We anticipate 200 to 250 people. This is to request a waiver of all fees for the use of the building. We are not charging an admission fee. We will not be using the kitchen but we do plan to serve light refreshments. Thanks for your consideration. Sincerely, Edith A. Hughes Chief Executive Officer "Building for the New Millennium" City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 27, 2001 10 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE PREPARED Y EXPLANATION. Attached is a communication to the Mayor and City Council submitted by the City Clerk regarding compensation. The Mayor requested that it be placed on the Agenda with any comments deemed appropriate. COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENT — CITY CLERK Tom G. McCabe Applicable observations are summarized as follows: DEPARTMENT City Manager • From a personnel administration standpoint, a competitive salary is always valid. This can be defined as a salary paid comparable positions in parallel agencies, which is normally an average of minimum and maximum salaries. • The concept of "ranges" is not unusual but rather the standard for City Clerks throughout the region. • Some of the data used may be dated as periodic adjustments have occurred. New figures are at a higher level and would only enhance the justifications cited in the memorandum. • The comparison with the City of La Mesa is realistic as it is similar to National City in population, size, budget, and functions. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Council Direction. BOARD COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Communication to Mayor and City Council Resolution No A-200 (Rev. 9/eao) City of National City Office of the City Clerk 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950-4397 Michael R. Dalla, CMC - City Clerk (619) 336-4228 Fax: (619) 336-4229 February 8, 2001 To: Mayor and City Council From: Michael Dalla, City Clerk 4 Subject: Compensation Adjustment In 1999, the City Council adopted and implemented "The Managerial Compensation Plan" for Executive and Management Personnel, effective at the start of the first pay period in Fiscal Year 1999-2000. The plan, in part, called for the following: 1. The City's compensation philosophy is to establish and maintain a compensation structure based on market place norms and internal alignment. 2. The Management Compensation Plan and its compensation survey component is to be updated periodically with recommended revisions proposed by the City Manager to the City Council, as necessary. 3. The City's goal is to be "at market" by June 30, 2002, and to maintain this position using this Plan in future years. 4. The City Manager was directed to reflect the compensation plan in the Final Budget for Fiscal Year 1999-2002. ® Recycled Paper Mayor and City Council Page Two Despite the fact that the City Clerk's compensation in National City is last among all comparable cities in the county and 50 % below the average, the City Council, at the time, excluded the City Clerk from the Executive Compensation Plan adjustments that began in 1999. The City Council decided, instead, that the salary of the City Clerk "should be increased by the same percentages, and subject to the same conditions, as the salary increases of Municipal Employees' Association (MEA) members for Fiscal Years 1999 and 2000." Tying salary adjustments for the City Clerk to those received by the Municipal Employees Association failed to address a fundamental question and discrepancy that is overdue for resolution. Namely, is the City Clerk's base compensation fair and equitable when compared to other City Clerks, both elected and appointed, in San Diego County; and if not, how to best go about correcting the disparity. Recommendation That the City Clerk be included in the 'Management Compensation' Plan adopted in 1999 and be placed in a salary band. That the bottom of the band be the current salary of the National City City Clerk and the top of the band be no more than 10% less than the top of the band for the elected City Clerk of La Mesa. That effective at the start of fiscal years 2000-2001, 2001-2002 and 2002- 2003 the salary of the City Clerk shall be increased in equal amounts sufficient to bring the Clerk's salary to the top of the above mentioned salary band (= to 10% less than La Mesa). That future band adjustments be at the same time and manner prescribed in the 'Managerial Compensation Plan' and future salary adjustments shall be sufficient to maintain the City Clerk of National City at a rate no more than 10% below the elected City Clerk of La Mesa. 2 City Clerk Salary Data and Ranking City Min Max Actual Auto TOTAL Rank Chula Vista $7,782.00 $7,782.00 $285.00 $8,067.00 1 Del Mar $5,215.00 $6,414.00 $6,414.00 $450.00 $6,864.00 2 Vista $5,094.00 $6,383.00 $6,383.00 $396.00 $6,779.00 3 Escondido $4,902.00 $8,510.00 $6,333.00 $250.00 $6,583.00 4 San Marcos $6,000.00 $9,000.00 $6,269.00 $250.00 $6,519.00 5 Poway $6,125.00 $6,125.00 $300.00 $6,425.00 6 Oceanside $6,223.00 $6,223.00 $6,223.00 7 La Mesa $5,258.00 $6,308.00 $5,905.00 $150.00 $6,055.00 8 Salona Beach $4,704.00 $5,732.00 $5,619.00 $200.00 $5,819.00 9 Encinitas $4,737.00 $5,758.00 $5,483.00 $300.00 $5,783.00 10 Coronado $3,625.00 $5,103.00 $4,533.00 $4,533.00 11 Average Median National City Elected Clerks Only $6,097.00 50% $6,332.00 56% $6,223.00 54% $6,425.00 59% $4,047.00 $4,047.00 $4,047.00 Escondido Oceanside La Mesa $6,333.00 $6,223.00 $5,905.00 $6,583.00 $6,223.00 $6,055.00 Average $6,154.00 plus 52% $6,287.00 plus 55% Median $6,223.00 plus 54% $6,223.00. plus 54% National City $4,047.00 $4,047.00 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE February 27, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 ITEM TITLE REPORT ON CODE REGULATIONS AFFECTING CDC RELOCATION OF VFW PREPARED BY Roger Post CP DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION. Council asked at its February 20 meeting that staff review Code regulations affecting the proposed relocation of the VFW to 918 National City Boulevard (Weisser's Sporting Goods). A report addressing this is attached. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Review information in the attached report BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Background Report Resolution No. A-200 (Rev. 9/80) BACKGROUND REPORT At the February 20, 2001 Council meeting, a representative from the local VFW post approached Council and expressed concerns over the relocation of their facility from its current location at 936 National City Boulevard. The move is needed to accommodate the Education Village redevelopment project. They are considering the Weisser's Sporting Goods store at 1018 National City Boulevard as a possible relocation site and are seeking assurances that they can receive the necessary approvals. Their current location is zoned General Commercial -Planned Development (CG-PD). It does not conform to the City's alcohol regulations in that it is closer than 660 feet from a school (Higher Education Center) and is within 500 feet of several establishments which sell alcohol for on -site consumption. In addition the post does not have a conditional use permit. For these reasons it is considered a lawful non -conforming use. The facility also was established without sufficient parking. The Weisser's site at 1018 National City Boulevard, zoned Medium Commercial (CM), has been a permitted gun shop for many years. A CUP is required for a private club in this zone as well. The site, as with their current location, does not meet the distance requirements since it is within 660 feet of the temporary Higher Education Facility at 921 National City Boulevard and is also within 500 feet from several establishments which sell alcoholic beverages. Because of this, the Code would not allow a facility selling alcohol such as the VFW to locate at Weisser's. In addition, the Weisser's location does not have sufficient parking to accommodate the VFW, which could generate significant parking demand, particularly when they are staging special events. If the appropriate findings were made, theoretically a variance for the parking could be issued. The alcohol regulations however are not subject to the variance process since that would result in the granting of a use variance, which is prohibited by State law. At one time the area near 8th Street and National City Boulevard was referred to as the "Mile of Bars". The City's alcohol regulations are intended to prevent that type of concentration of alcohol selling establishments from occurring again.