Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2001 09-04 CC AGENDA PKT
G;if,j'CG.a& AGENDA OF A REGULAR MEETING NATIONAL CITY CITY COUNCIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS CIVIC CENTER 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD REGULAR MEETING - TUESDAY — SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 - 6:00 P.M. OPEN TO THE PUBLIC PLEASE COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE MEETING AND SUBMIT IT TO THE CITY CLERK IT IS THE INTENTION OF YOUR CITY COUNCIL TO BE RECEPTIVE TO YOUR CONCERNS IN THIS COMMUNITY. YOUR PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT WILL ASSURE A RESPONSIBLE AND EFFICIENT CITY OF NATIONAL CITY. WE INVITE YOU TO BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY MANAGER ANY MATTER THAT YOU DESIRE THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER. WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR PRESENCE AND WISH YOU TO KNOW THAT WE APPRECIATE YOUR INVOLVEMENT. ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG BY CITY MANAGER, TOM G. MCCABE INVOCATION APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2001. PRESENTATION South Bay Transit First Study Draft Work Scope — MTDB Representative COPIES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDAS AND MINUTES MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH OUR WEBSITE AT www.ci.national-city.ca.us COUNCIL AGENDA 9/4/01 PAGE 2 PROCLAMATION Proclaiming September 16-22, 2001 to be: "YELLOW RIBBON YOUTH SUICIDE AWARENESS AND PREVENTION WEEK" INTERVIEWS/APPOINTMENTS Traffic Safety Committee — Appointments Housing and Community Development Committee — Appointment CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Council member, a staff member, or a member of the public. 1. Resolution No. 2001-132 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National. City authorizing the City Manager to submit an application for grant funds from the Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhoods, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. (Parks & Recreation) 2. Resolution No. 2001-133 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Manager to submit an application for grant funds from the Roberti-z' Berg -Harris Urban open space and recreation program under the Safe Neighborhoods, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. (Parks & Recreation) COUNCIL AGENDA 9/4/01 PAGE 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 3. Resolution No. 2001-134 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Manager to submit an application for local grant funds from the state for rehabilitation of the municipal pool. (Parks & Recreation) 4. Resolution No. 2001-135 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Manager to submit an application for grant funds from the state for fencing for athletic fields. (Parks & Recreation) 5. Resolution No. 2001-136 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City scheduling a Public Hearing to consider amendment of the National City Fee Schedule. (Building & Safety) 6. Resolution No. 2001-137 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City awarding a contract to Randall Construction for the J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Rehabilitation Project and approving the reappropriation of funds. (Spec. No. 00-11) (Engineering) 7. Resolution No. 2001-138 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a Coastal Development Permit for a sand blast materials storage and distribution facility on the south side of Bay Marina Drive approximately 335 feet west of Harrison Avenue/Bay Marina Way. (Applicant: Abel Parra for Kleen Blast Abrasives) (Case File No. CDP-2001-1) (Planning) COUNCIL AGENDA 9/4/01 PAGE 4 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 8. WARRANT REGISTER NO. 08 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $2,263,050.50. 9. WARRANT REGISTER NO.09 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $1,626,233.17. 10. h Consolidated Cash and Investment Report as of May 31, 2001. (Finance) 11. Claim for Damages: Cecilia S. McKimmy (City Clerk) 12. Claim for Damages: Rueben Cavada (City Clerk) 13. Claim for Damages: John Williams (City Clerk) 14. Claim for Damages: Juan Pittayrizzont (City Clerk) NON CONSENT RESOLUTION 15. Resolution No. 2001-139 Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City opposing recommendations of the Regional Government Efficiency Commission. (City Manager) COUNCIL AGENDA 9/4/01 PAGE 5 ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION 16. An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City amending Title 12 of the National City Municipal Code pertaining to noise control. (City Attorney) OLD BUSINESS 17. Discussion of PASACAT's El Toyon Proposal (City Manager) NEW BUSINESS 18. Request for use of the Community Center by the National City Community Concert Band and waiver of fees. (Public Works) 19. Request for use of the Community Center by the National City Chamber of Commerce and waiver of fees. (Public Works) 20. Temporary Use Permit — National City Library- National City celebrates Literacy and Reading is Fundamental Book Giveaway/Chili Cook Off. (Building & Safety) 21. Temporary Use Permit — McCune -Chrysler -Plymouth -Jeep Used Vehicle Tent Sale. (Building & Safety) 22. Temporary Use Permit — Westcott Mazda Kia-Used Vehicle Tent Sale. (Building & Safety) 23. Notice of Decision — Conditional Use Permit for a wireless communications facility on an existing building adjacent to and east of the San Diego Trolley Line between 21st and 22nd Streets. (Applicant: Sprint PCS) (Case File No. CUP-2001-4) (Planning) COUNCIL AGENDA 9/4/01 PAGE 6 NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) 24. Notice of Decision — Variance for an office building with less than required parking and projections into the required front yard in the 1400 block of Highland Avenue. (Applicant: Kathryn Willets for Paul Agpaoa and the Community Development Commission) (Case File No.: Z-2001-10) (Planning) -* CITY MANAGER -* CITY ATTORNEY -* OTHER STAFF -* MAYOR -* CITY COUNCIL 25. Discussion of Regional Government Efficiency Commission (RGEC) — Councilman Morrison 26. Discussion of SB 865 (Polanco) California and Mexico Border Infrastructure Financing Authority (CMBIFA) — Councilman Morrison 27. Summary of Assembly Bill 93 (Wayne) — Creating the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority — Councilman Morrison COUNCIL AGENDA 9/4/01 PAGE 7 NEW BUSINESS (Cont.) PUBLIC ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Five -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to State Law, items requiring Council action must be brought back on a subsequent Council agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. ADJOURNMENT Next Regular City Council meeting — September 18, 2001 at 6:00 p.m. — Council Chambers, Civic Center TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE AND TO LISTEN TO IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DRAFT SOUTH BAY TRANSIT FIRST STUDY SCOPE OF WORK PURPOSE The primary objective of this study is to develop a transit plan and identify transit projects in the South Bay area of San Diego consistent with the Metropolitan Transit Development Board's (MTDB) adopted Transit First strategy. The South Bay Transit First Study will include a phased implementation strategy so that the identified projects can be defined and incorporated into the San Diego Association of Government's Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), the City of Chula Vista's General Plan Update, and land use planning activities for the Cities of San Diego, National City and Imperial Beach and the County of San Diego. The study will: • Evaluate, refine and develop a Transit First plan for the South Bay study area, including internal connections, links to key external destinations, transit priority measures and station locations. A regional conceptual Transit First plan has been developed (and is currently being updated by SANDAG) which will provide a framework for developing the focused South Bay Transit First Plan. • Identify and refine Transit First Yellow, Red, Blue and Green Car projects from the plan, with particular emphasis on Yellow and Red Car services. Service concepts for Yellow, Red, Blue and Green Car projects is the foundation of MTDB's Transit First strategy. • Develop a phasing plan for the identified projects that is consistent with the Transit First phasing strategy scheduled for adoption by the MTD Board of Directors in late 2001. The phasing strategy will build a network of projects for the near, mid and long terms. • Conduct conceptual design of selected stations and transit priority treatments. • Assess the role of the MTDB adopted South Bay Transit Way in the South Bay Transit First plan. PROJECT BACKGROUND In 1993, the MTD Board adopted the South Bay Public Transportation Plan and the South Bay Light Rail Transit (LRT) Extension study. As a result of these efforts, the MTD Board of Directors adopted two light rail alignments in South Bay (Otay Ranch LRT and Otay Mesa LRT) for planning purposes (Attachment A). Dedicated right-of-way for an LRT alignment and station sites have been integrated into the design plans for several transit -oriented villages in Otay Ranch, and right-of-way reservations have been incorporated into development agreements along Otay Mesa Road. The alignments and right-of-way have been identified more generally as Transitways in SANDAG's Regional Transportation Plan. Subsequently, however, the MTD Board adopted a Transit First strategic plan that has led MTDB to rethink the way its provides transit in the region, including the South Bay. The adopted Transit First strategy has its basis in market research, transit/land use integration and Bus Rapid Transit concepts. The Transit First strategy shows how public transportation can play an increased role in providing an attractive alternative to the automobile to help accommodate regional growth and meet travel needs over the next 20+ years. Creating a new and different transit customer experience has been a guiding force in the Transit First strategy. To achieve a positive customer experience, the design of the transit system must pay attention to travel speeds and service reliability (transit priority), access, walk and wait environment (land use integration), and design issues and customer amenities at stops and on vehicles. The Transit First strategy includes a rich network of service types ranging from neighborhood shuttles serving short -distance trips, to higher -speed, limited stop routes for longer distance trips, as follows: • Yellow Car — Serves longer distance trips (6+ miles), maintaining high average speeds (35-40 mph) with very limited stops. Yellow Car routes would compliment Red Car services to form the spine of the regional transit system. Yellow Car services would require extensive use of transit priority treatments such as dedicated running ways, queue jumpers and signal priority. Yellow Car service is used in two ways: -Srving corridorsis justified ased on links between one ns and destinations and land where longer tuse patternsspacingation that lead tolonger distance tr pmaking for 9 -Serving as an overlay in selected Red Car corridors where a faster, more limited -stop service is justified (in addition to Red Car service) for high -volume, long-distance trip needs. • Red Car — Serves medium -distance trip (1-9 miles), maintaining higher average speeds (20-25 mph) with limited stops. Red Car services are often linked to Blue Carservice for local distribution. The current San Diego Trolley system and the County's express bus routes mostly operate as Red Car service. Red Car services would require use of transit priority treatments such as dedicated running ways, queue jumpers and signal priority. • Blue Car — Serves short -distance trips (0-5 miles) with frequent stop spacing. Blue Car service provides basic mobility, albeit at low speeds (10-25 mph), on primarily local and arterial streets. Most of the current San Diego bus system operates as Blue Car service. • Green Car — Serves community -level tripmaking that could include neighborhood circulators, feeder access to Yellow and Red Car service, and/or specialized fixed -route shuttles. Green Car services would likely use smaller shuttle vehicles. In some situations, Green Car services would benefit from dedicated running ways and queue jumpers. The Transit First vision is to make transit such a desirable option that people will make it their first choice for many of their daily travel needs. The South Bay Transit First Study is the first step toward implementation of the Transit First vision and strategy in a focused geographic area (South Bay). More information about the Transit First vision and strategy is provided in the following enclosed documents: • "TransitWorks" report • Transit First Fact Sheet • MTD Board reports from June 14, 2001, July 12, 2001 and August 9, 2001 • Article "Transit First: A New Vision for Transit in San Diego" PROJECT LIMITS The South Bay study area is defined as the border of San Diego and National City to the north, the County of San Diego/Bonita to the east, the Pacific Ocean to the west, and the International Border to -2- the south (Attachment X). Within the study area, the focus will be the City of Chula Vista, the City of National City, and their surrounding planning areas. COORDINATION WITH OTHER AGENCIES This study is undertaken in partnership with the City of Chula Vista, the City of National City, the City of San Diego, the County of San Diego and SANDAG. The consultant shall provide ongoing coordination with these and other agencies. This coordination with other agencies will be an important part of the study effort and will include, but not be limited to, the following agencies: City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego, City of National City, Chula Vista Transit, County of San Diego, City of Imperial Beach, SANDAG, Caltrans, San Diego Trolley Inc., and San Diego Transit Corp. The City of Chula Vista has retained a consultant to provide assistance with its General Plan Update and provide input to this study. Meetings will be held with these agencies, as needed, throughout the project. The consultant shall provide meeting notes outlining the date, attendance, highlights, and follow-up actions. In addition, the consultant will be required to prepare graphics for these meetings. These will generally be figures, flip charts, Power Point presentations, or other presentation materials as directed by MTDB. COORDINATION WITH THE PUBLIC Project Review Committees shall be established for the study to provide a means for citizen input and guidance for the work effort. These committees will consist of business owners, corridor residents, property owners, and other interested parties. They will meet as needed, generally every two to three months. The consultant's project manager, and other consultant staff as needed, will be required to attend these committee meetings. In addition, the consultant will be required to prepare graphics, reports, or other presentation aids for these meetings. COORDINATION WITH COMMUNITY OUTREACH CONSULTANT The consultant will coordinate with the related public outreach efforts underway in the region, particularly at MTDB, City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego and SANDAG. The related public outreach efforts include the City of Chula Vista's General Plan update, the City of San Diego's City of Villages Strategic Framework, SANDAG's Region 2020 Growth Strategy and Regional Transportation Plan update and MTDB's Transit First implementation program. In addition, the consultant will coordinate and participate in public outreach specific to this study, including: • Assisting in organizing and conducting public meetings • Preparing official communications with the community • Providing necessary graphics as directed by MTDB • Preparing delivering presentations as directed by MTDB All official communications with the general public shall be cleared with the MTDB project manager in advance. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION MTDB is the primary lead for this study which is undertaken in partnership with the City of Chula Vista, the City of San Diego, the City of National City, the County of San Diego and SANDAG. MTDB will -3- have overall administration responsibility for the contract. PROJECT STAFFING To be as effective as possible, it is essential that a majority of the consultant support services be administered in the Southern California area. The MTD Board strongly encourages the participation of local firms. The Project Manager will be expected to make presentations concerning the project, schedule and budget to public and private parties. The Project Manager may be removed and replaced only with written consent of the MTDB General Manager. PROJECT COORDINATION AND PROGRESS REPORTING PROCEDURES The Consultant shall communicate and coordinate work and progress on the project with the MTDB Project Manager. Coordination and administration for the project shall include: • Project Management Plan: The Consultant shall prepare and submit, within fourteen (14) days following a fully executed Contract, a project plan for management coordination and control to ensure successful and timely completion of the. project scope. The management plan shall include, at a minimum, a detailed breakdown of the project costs by task, a detailed staffing plan by task, a detailed schedule for each work task and an overall work flow chart identifying critical path work items. The project management plan shall provide the basis against which the project status and progress will be measured and reported. • Tracking System: The Consultant shall establish a monthly tracking/reporting system. The purpose of the tracking system shall be to report on the progress of the project and keep the project on schedule. The tracking system shall include, but not be limited to a report on project status, project schedule, costs by each sub -task, staffing revisions, descriptions of work completed and work remaining by sub -task, and DBE utilization. In addition, Consultant shall attend at least two (2) meetings per month with Project Team (MTDB and Consultant staff). The purpose of the meetings shall be to report and document the study status, discuss and identify any unforeseen issues, and recommend action plan to keep the study on schedule and within budget. Additional status reports shall be presented to the MTDB staff at key milestones and as necessary during the project. The consultant shall be responsible for preparing minutes of all meetings and circulating such minutes for review by attendees within one week of meeting date. The consultant shall prepare a standard "meeting notes" format for submittal to MTDB. All schedule related tracking shall be done on via Microsoft Scheduler or compatible format and be posted in the Project Folder. • Computerized Project Folder: The consultant shall provide a project folder that is accessible via the Internet to all project participants. This project folder should contain all documentation related to this project including all correspondence, maps, photos, work plans, etc. This project folder should be updated within two working days of the distribution of a deliverable. • Monthly status and progress reports: The Consultant shall prepare and submitted to MTDB monthly reports that include a summary of activities completed during the previous month (by task), scheduled activities for the next month, (by task and responsible person) and any problems encountered during the previous month. • Monthly invoices: The Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to MTDB, that include a Progress Payment Report of services performed during the reporting period by contract work task , the -4- hourly breakdown by staff level, the percent of each work task and overall project completed to date and the amount and percent of overall project budget completed to date. PROJECT SCHEDULE All work shall be completed within 15 months after Notice to Proceed. The preliminary schedule for the project, indicating activities (by work task), start dates, activity duration, product submittal dates, relationships among work tasks (including critical path items) and float time is included in the attachments. The schedule shall account for interface with and review by MTDB and other agencies. The Prime Consultant will be responsible for timely transmittal of data and information to all subconsultants so that subconsultants are able to maintain the project schedule. DESCRIPTION OF TASKS AND PRODUCTS The Scope of Work consists of the following Tasks: Task 1 — Data Collection, Review and Organization Task 2 — Develop Plan and Project Evaluation Criteria and Methodology Task 3 — Identify Travel Patterns Task 4 — Develop Service, Priority Treatment, and Station Location Alternatives Task 5 — Develop Ridership, Capital and Operating Cost Estimations Task 6 - Evaluate Universe of Yellow, Red and Green Car Alternatives Task 7 — Develop Yellow, Red and Green Car Plan Task 8 — Develop Conceptual Engineering/Site Plans for Station Locations Identified in Task 7.0 Task 9 — Develop Conceptual Engineering for Transit Priority Treatments Identified in Task 7.0 Task 10 — Develop Supporting Blue Car Network Plan Task 11— Develop South Bay Transit First Plan Task 12— Develop Phasing/Implementation Plan Task 13— Agency Coordination and Public Involvement Consultant shall submit all task deliverables (as applicable) to MTDB for review and approval prior to release of any verbal or written presentation material to outside agencies and the general public. The scope of work is defined in the following description of individual tasks. TASK 1.0 DATA COLLECTION, REVIEW AND ORGANIZATION 1.1.1 Gather and conduct a data review of all existing information related to the study area. Including but not limited to the following: • January 2001 TransitWorks report • Transit First Implementation Work Program • SANDAG Regional Transit Vision • City of Chula Vista Existing General Plan • City of Chula Vista General Plan Update Work Program • Scope of Work and Progress Reports for the Chula Vista Transit Short -Range Bus Study • Otay Ranch General Development Plan • Final EIR/EIS for State Route 125 South -5- • Caltrans Project Report and other studies for SR 905 • Eastlake III Sectional Planning Area Plan Final. • National City General Plan • County of San Diego General Plan Update • City of San Diego's City of Villages • Other relevant master plans, general plans, and redevelopment plans 1.1.2 Review the City of Chula Vista's preliminary Yellow and Red car plan of services. 1.1.3 Review the City of Chula Vista plans for street improvements, Caltrans plans for the Toll Road and any highway/freeway improvements, SR-125 connector improvements, and MTDB's LRT alignment studies. 1.1.4 Review the MTDB Design Criteria and Design Manual. 1.1.5 Review existing and projected traffic data for the study area. 1.1.6 Consultant shall take part in up to two working days of extensive field reconnaissance tours with MTDB, Chula Vista, National City and other project review staff. Consultant shall take relevant pictures and video of the study area to be placed in the Project Folder. Task 1.2 Prepare Aerial Photography This task shall include the preparation of aerial photography, which shall be the basis for the conceptual planning work. Photos may be purchased from an aerial photo -bank. 1.2.1 Prepare color aerial mosaic at 1"=200' of the South Bay study area. These photographs shall be mounted on display boards in sizes (maximum 30"x40") that are easily transported to public meetings. 1.2.2 Provide color aerial topography for City of Chula Vista including any future land acquisitions or developments that will be incorporated into the City's General Plan. Task 1.3 GIS Data and Mapping This task shall constitute the platform from which all maps outlined in future tasks shall be created. 1.3.1 To ensure compatibility with local and regional GIS systems, provide data in a format that is compatible with ESRI GIS software in a real world coordinate system, preferably the stateplane coordinate system. 1.3.2 All technical planning work done on a GIS platform will be placed in the Project Folder. Deliverables: List of background materials reviewed Mounted color aerial mosaics -6- GIS data and mapping in Project Folder TASK 2.0 DEVELOP PLAN AND PROJECT EVALUATION CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY The purpose of the evaluation criteria is to provide a decision -making framework for review and selection of projects that will constitute the South Bay Transit First plan. Strategic and agency goals, provided to the consultant, shall be the basis for criteria development and will be used to determine how the proposed projects meet the objectives of the Transit First strategy and stakeholders. 2.1.1 Develop Evaluation Criteria The consultant shall develop service network and project evaluation criteria which includes but is not limited to the following: • Connectivity/Access • Travel Time Savings • Ridership • Environmental Impacts • Traffic Circulation Impacts • Engineering Feasibility • Priority Treatments Feasibility • Land Use Coordination • Capital and Operating Cost • Productivity Indicators • Cost -Benefit of Services and Priority Treatment 2.1.2 Develop Evaluation Methodology The consultant shall develop an evaluation methodology evaluate alternative service proposals and to guide the development of the South Bay Transit First plan and identification of project. Deliverables: Evaluation Criteria Evaluation of Alternatives Methodology TASK 3.0 IDENTIFY TRAVEL PATTERNS MTDB and SANDAG have developed a conceptual network of services as part of the Transit First strategy. The conceptual network map illustrates the overall regional connectivity of the system and major service corridors for the Yellow and Red Car services. The basis for the network was the travel demand model maintained by SANDAG, which provides the best available source of future travel pattern data. SANDAG is now refining its transportation model to include City of San Diego's new land use strategy called City of Villages and land use updates provided by other jurisdictions. In conjunction with the SANDAG's model update, the Transit First service network will be refined to reflect a more detailed origin -destination analysis and the updated land use data. SANDAG will use the updated model results to develop a Regional Transit Vision as the basis for an update to the Regional Transportation Plan. The Regional Transit Vision is scheduled for approval by the SANDAG Board in November 2001. The Transit First network map will be updated to incorporate the approved Regional Transit Vision. -7- This task involves examining the updated Transit First network prepared by SANDAG to confirm and supplement travel patterns and key origin/destination data for the study area for both inter- and intra- YConsultant shall quately atterns for smaller, targeted areas of the study areawhich the SANDAG model cannot ade Task 3.1 Review Basis of Transit First Network 3.1.1 Review the updated Transit First network and SANDAG transportation model output data. 3.1.2 Establish from discussion with SANDAG, City of San Diego, MTDB, and NCTD any outstanding issues or questions raised during the development of the updated network. Task 3.2 Develop Methodology for Confirming and Supplementing SANDAG Travel Pattern Data 3.2.1 confirm that they are adequately reflenerators and ected innters in and SANDAG's modeoutside the study area and 3.2.2 Identify key regional connections to and from the study area. 3.2.3 Working with the jurisdictions, identify and analyze key strategic links. Strategic links may be different from the travel patterns identified by SANDAG's modeling and can be used by a jurisdiction to channel future development and economic investment. 3.2.4 Identify tbe adequately re key flected Origins/Destinations , 0/De) Swithin the study ANDAG model area that may be at too small a scale 3.2.5 Identify key connections between the International Border to locations within the study area and also to key regional destinations. The SANDAG model does not include International Border crossing data. 3.2.6 Determine if more detailed analysis of travel patterns in study area and focus areas is atif tlbfor special trip adequately reflectedinheaaale data Use available market survey data in the analysis. AG 3 2 7 data to Deflect the focused look on thfor e South and Bay study area and fthe ocus areas.) pattern Task 3.3 Predict and Analyze Travel Pattern 3.3.1 Analyze information from Task 3.2 to confirm, supplement and enhance the travel patterns data. 3.3.2 Summarize results and apply validation checks. 3.3.3 Document all technical methods and assumptions in a technical memorandum. Deliverable: -8- Technical Memorandum "Analysis of Travel Patterns" TASK 4.0 DEVELOP SERVICE, PRIORITY TREAMENT, AND STATION LOCATION ALTERNATIVES The purpose of this task is to identify service, priority treatment, and station location alternatives that can be evaluated using the criteria developed in Task 2.0. The focus of this task will be to identify a network of Yellow and Red Car services and a supporting network of Green car services on which Yellow Car services are particularly dependent. In addition, this task will include identification of the necessary supporting priority treatments and station locations. Task 4.1 Identify Universe of Yellow, Red, and Green Car Services 4.1.1 Develop a network diagram that illustrates the key nodes and connections within and outside the study area. The network diagram should confirm or revise existing regional links identified in SANDAG's modeling and the Regional Transportation Plan. 4.1.1 Based on the origin/destination and travel pattern data gleaned and developed in Task 3.0, and the City of Chula Vista's preliminary Yellow and Red Car services map, identify a universe of Yellow, Red and Green Car service options to address travel needs. The routing options should address both inter- and intra- study area services and should include linkages/transfer opportunities with existing and proposed services, and connections with study area and regional trip generators that will ultimately lead toward a network of services consistent with the Transit First strategy. Some planning work related to the identification of these routes and network has been conducted. It will be the responsibility of the consultant to build on the existing work. 4.1.2 Evaluate the segments of the adopted South Bay Transitway alignment relative to identified travel patterns and strategic links for appropriateness of segments and continued inclusion in this plan. 4.1.3 Develop conceptual service plan (frequency and span of service) for the service options. Task 4.2 Identify Transit Priority Treatment Locations and Options Transit Priority Measures are an essential element of the Transit First strategy . In this task, the consultant will be responsible for analysis of appropriate types of priority treatments, where they will be located, and general location feasibility and general right-of-way requirements. 4.2.1 Determine where transit priority treatments are needed to bypass traffic congestion, provide direct routing, maintain high travel speeds and enhance service reliability. 4.2.2 Identify options for transit priority treatments at the identified locations. 4.2.3 Assess the general or relative feasibility of implementing identified priority treatments. Task 4.3 Identify Station Location Options -9- 4.3.1 Identify potential station locations, taking into consideration existing and future access, walk and wait environment and land use integration. Task 4.4 Assess Transit/Land Use Integration With Existing and Future Development 4.4.1 Evaluate candidate station right-of-way requirements. 4.4.2 Evaluate land use implications in areas surrounding candidate station locations. 4.4.3 Provide suggestions for strengthening land -uses near candidate station locations. 4.4.4 Assess ability to provide front -door access at identified candidate station locations. Task 4.5 Develop Map of Service, Priority Treatment and Station Location Options 4.5.1tion Preparema "working" and candidatethat shows the universe of service options, station locations. Include major transfer points, major and of priority treatments generators, and surrounding land -uses. Deliverables: Technical Memorandum "Yellow, Red, Green Car Service Alternatives" Conceptual maps (public display ready) displaying proposed services, priority treatments, station locations and land uses. Transit Supportive Land -Use Plan TASK 5.0 RIDERSHIP, CAPITAL, AND OPERATING COST ESTIMATION This effort is not meant to be a detailed analysis of ridership forecasts or cost estimations, but rather an order of magnitude assessment for initial planning purposes. 5.1.1 Develop ridership estimation methodology and estimates. 5.1.2 Develop an order of magnitude capital cost estimate for priority treatments, stations, and vehicle acquisition. 5.1.3 Develop operating cost estimates for the Yellow, Red, and Green Car service options. 5.1.4 Develop productivity indicators for the service options. These should include measures such as passengers per vehicle hour, passengers per vehicle mile and cost per passenger. Deliverable: Technical Memorandum, "Ridership, Operating and Capital Cost Estimates". TASK 6.0 EVALUATE UNIVERSE OF YELLOW, RED AND GREEN CAR ALTERNATIVES -10- Based on the work conducted in Tasks 1 — 5, evaluate the universe of Yellow, Red and Green Car service options identified in Task 6. Prepare an evaluation matrix and supporting documentation, and develop recommendations for the services, priority treatments, station locations, and supporting land - uses. Reasons for all recommendations must be well documented in the Evaluation Summary including reference to or guidance from the project's goals and evaluation criteria developed in Task 2. Present the advantages, disadvantages and potential impacts of each alternative. Concerns and comments of the public groups and advisory committees shall be conveyed. It is the intent of this task that the recommended alternatives would be incorporated into the regional Transit First network plan and included in the Regional Transportation Plan. Deliverable: Technical Memorandum "Evaluation Results" TASK 7.0 DEVELOP YELLOW, RED AND GREEN CAR PLAN This task would present the results of the above tasks in a comprehensive report detailing the Yellow, Red, and Green Car services. The plan would summarize the process and results from Tasks 1-6 and would be the basis for further updating and refining the Transit First network. The plan would include the following: • Process for project alternatives selection • Identification of Yellow, Red, and Green Car projects, priority treatments and station locations • Establish service levels • Present capital and operating cost for Plan • Identify land use integration strategies for Plan • Identify unique projects (routings/segments/links). This would include all the components of the project, e.g., priority measures, station locations, and land - use integration. • Identify ridership for projects The plan would be the basis for developing Blue Car Network. In addition, for meeting purposes of display maps shall be produced that clearly show the proposed plan with overlays for each category of service (Yellow, Red, Green), priority measures and existing and proposed land uses. Deliverables: Technical Report "Yellow, Red, and Green Car Network Plan" Display Maps (with Overlays) TASK 8.0 DEVELOP CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING/SITE PLANS FOR STATION LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED IN TASK 7.0 8.1.1 Develop conceptual designs for key identified stations. -11- 8.1.2 Determine station right-of-way requirements 8.1.3 For station locations, identify possible engineering, community, and environmental issues and constraints. Where constraints are identified provide suggestions for mitigation. Deliverables: Conceptual engineering and station site plans Display Maps TASK 9.0 DEVELOP CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING FOR TRANSIT PRIORITY TREATMENTS IDENTIFIED IN TASK 7.0 9.1.1 Conduct conceptual engineering for transit priority treatments identified in Task 7.0. 9.1.2 '= Determine transit priority treatment right-of-way and technical requirements. 9.1.3 Evaluate vehicle guidance systems as possible priority treatments. 9.1.3 Estimate capital costs of identified priority treatments. 9.1.4 Identify environmental constraints of identified priority measures. 9.1.5 Develop a "sensitivity" map that clearly illustrates the travel time savings from each of the identified transit priority treatments. 9.1.6 Conduct a cost/benefit and trade-off analysis of how each priority measure related to passenger travel time, reliability and mobility, and implementation feasibility, constraints and cost. Deliverables: Conceptual transit priority treatment engineering plans Technical memorandum summarizing right-of-way requirements, technical requirements, vehicle guidance system analysis, environmental constraints, capital cost estimates and cost/benefit/trade-off analysis Travel time sensitivity map TASK 10.0 DEVELOP SUPPORTING BLUE CAR NETWORK PLAN The purpose of this task is to develop a supporting Blue Car network that will complement the plan developed in Task 7.0. This will involve reviewing the existing Blue Car system of services and supplementing it with new Blue Car routings that support the proposed Yellow, Red and Green Car system. 10.1.1 Integrate existing blue car system of services with proposed plan in Task 7.0 (particular attention should be paid to CVT recent bus study). -12- 10.1.2 Develop new blue car routings to support local circulation and the proposed Yellow, Red and Green Car plan. 10.1.3 Detail where transfer opportunities will occur. 10.1.4 Develop an order of magnitude estimate of operating/capital cost, ridership, and service levels. Deliverable: Technical Memorandum, "Blue Car Network Plan" including ridership, operating, and capital cost estimates. TASK 11.0 DEVELOP SOUTH BAY TRANSIT FIRST PLAN This task would present and combine the results of Tasks 7 and 9 in a comprehensive report detailing the Yellow, Red, Green, and Blue Car services for the South Bay Transit First Network Plan. It is intended that this plan would provide the basis for projects in the Regional Transportation Plan. A separate report addressing the recommendations for land use changes and/or land use justification for site selection of stations will be prepared. Deliverables: Draft South Bay Transit First Plan Transit Supported Land Use Integration Strategies TASK 12.0 DEVELOP PHASING/IMPLEMENTATION PLAN MTDB and SANDAG will be developing a strategy to guide the phasing of the Transit First projects. It is expected that the consultant will organize the proposed projects in accordance with the phasing strategy. It is anticipated that the consultant would prepare a draft South Bay Phasing/Implementation Plan that identifies the following: • Segment/Links and timeline for implementation • Service Level phasing • Priority Treatment Phasing • Station Phasing • Land Use Development Phasing • Network of services for near, mid, and long-term projects • Ridership, Capital, and Operating Cost Estimates • Interim short term service options concurrent with new development This plan would identify assumptions and issues associated with each phase, develop a schedule for each phase that graphically depicts activities and timeline, and develop a cost benefit analysis. Deliverable: Draft South Bay Transit First Phasing/Implementation Plan -13- TASK 13.0 AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT The Consultant shall participate fully at each stage of public outreach. The Consultant shall assist with outreach to various elected officials/staff, community and neighborhood organizations, business organizations, property owners and other stakeholders and interested parties. MTDB shall direct and approve all contacts with elected officials/staff and the media. The Consultant shall take and record detailed notes of comments and concerns raised at all community workshops, and public meetings, and shall provide minutes of meetings, including issues raised and actions required. Task 13.1 Internal Coordination Meetings 13.1.1 The Consultant shall be available for meetings as needed and for purposes of this RFP, according to the following assumptions: Project Status Meetings 30 meetings (2 times per month for 15 months) Informal Project Meetings 10 meetings Project Bnefings 5 meetings Initial Agency Meeting 1 meeting 13.1.2 agreed upon, and presentatis will on items i emuire s relevant to ageon of nda (2 enda, times per month).et, and dule update as 13.1.3 Informal Project Meetings will require minimal advance preparation of graphics specific to the meeting (up to ten meetings). 13,1.4 Project Briefings will require minimal advance preparation of graphics specific to the meeting (up to five meetings). 13.1.7 The Consultant shall organize and conduct an initial Agency Information Meeting at MTDB. The purpose of the meeting shall be to review data, project schedule, work tasks, solicit input and discuss issues.The Consultant shall prepare an informational briefing package for the meeting identifying key corridor transportation statistics and demographic data. 13.1.8 The consultant shall work in conjunction with the City of Chula Vista's General Plan consultant, MTDB and SANDAG to formulate and establish a coordinated and complimentary plan and schedule for public outreach 13.1.9 The Consultant shall prepare the Project Folder in advance of the initial Agency Information Meeting and provide information on how to access the folder at this meeting. 13.1.10Ongoing review shall be maintained with key agencies throughout the study, based on issues and concerns identified. The consultant shall be responsible for providing minutes of inter -agency meetings, documenting issues discussed and providing follow-up on action items. Task 3.2 Public and Board/Council Meetings 13.2.1 Consultant will assist with preparation and participate in formal community and public meetings, which may require limited special graphics preparation (up to ten meetings). The Consultant shall work with the study partners to organize and conduct community meetings, which shall be held within the boundaries of the project area. The meetings shall be held during hours that -14- provide the greatest accessibility of attendance for community residents and stakeholders. The intent of the meetings shall be to review the purpose and need for the project, present study alternatives and evaluation results, solicit community input and dialogue regarding the alternatives and evaluation. 13.2.2 Consultant will assist with preparation (including developing Power Point presentations) for formal MTD Executive Committee and Board meetings, City Council Meetings, and meetings with council representatives from the impacted cities. Task 3.3 Communications Materials 13.3.1 Written Materials The Consultant shall prepare initial drafts of all written materials, including newsletters, fact sheets, meeting notices and invitations, display ads, and press releases, to MTDB for review, editing, and final development, prior to inclusion in the Project Folder. MTDB shall be responsible for final layout, graphic presentations, printing, and postage of the written outreach materials. 13.3.2 Graphic. Presentation Materials: The Consultant shall have strong graphics capabilities, and shall prepare graphic materials, as needed, for presentations of technical issues, including hand-out sheets, Power Point, presentation boards, slides, and overhead transparencies. The format for graphic presentation of materials may include chart tables, aerial oblique and plan photo images, montages, and/or renderings that clearly convey the character of the project alternatives. The presentation graphics are expected to include, but not be limited to, maps and other illustrations describing the analysis relating to major community issues. 13/3/3 Electronic Outreach/Information Material Deliverable: Community Participation Plan and Schedule So -Bay SOW.JWILLI2.TBates 8/23/01 -15- _ ?` t fg of National • 11ructamatiLU1 WHEREAS, Youth suicide is one of the most disruptive and tragic events a family and a community can experience, and is occurring at a national rate of over 5,000 suicides annually; and WHEREAS, Youth suicide is the "fastest growing killer of youth today". The issue of how to prevent it is of extreme importance and must be recognized as an immediate need for awareness and prevention; and WHEREAS, Statistics show that awareness, education and action do save lives. Heightened community awareness will encourage communities to develop strategies to prevent youth suicides. The City of National City is pleased to be at the forefront in leading these worthwhile efforts; and WHEREAS, The Yellow Ribbon is rapidly becoming recognized internationally as the symbol for the awareness and prevention of Youth suicide. It is recognized and used by suicide prevention groups, crisis centers, schools, churches, youth centers/hospitals, counselors, teachers, parents and especially youth themsevles; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, GEORGE H. WATERS, Mayor of the City of National City, do hereby proclaim September 16-22, 2001 to be: "YELLOW RIBBON YOUTH SUICIDE AWARENESS AND PREVENTION WEEK" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of National City to be affixed this 11' day of September, 2001. Geo�Waters, ayor Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor DATE: August 29, 2001 TO: Councilmembers FROM: George H. Waters, Mayor SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE We currently have two vacancies on the Traffic Safety Committee. Mr. Tracy Smith was currently interviewed by the City Council_ and would like to be considered for appointment. If there are no objections, I recommend we appoint Mr. Smith to the Traffic Safety Committee. This item will be placed on the City Council Agenda for the meeting of Tuesday, September 4, 2001. George H. Waters, Mayor ® Recycled Paper CITY OF N^ATIONAL CITY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PURPOSE AND INTENT: It is the purpose and intent of this form to provide the City Council with as much background information as possible on those persons willing to serve on any of the Boards and Commissions of the City of National City. Please note: This application will be kept on file and under consideration for one (1) year from the date it is submitted. THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED AS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT PLEASE CHECK THE BOARD OR COMMISSION FOR WINCH YOU ARE APPLYING (You May Apply for More than One) Building Advisory & Appeals Board Civil Service Commission Senior Citizens Advisory Board Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Serra Library Systems Board Street Tree & Parkway Committee Project Area Committee Student Commissioner Name: SYYI I T14 (Last) , ,/ Home Address: .02 4'�1 0 Planning Commission Port Commission Traffic Safety Committee IA/ Library Board of Trustees Sweetwater Authority San Diego County Water Authority Housing & Community Development Committee ✓✓ EC &iz I T.. 72 (First) Birth Date AJA 97unn4-t a(,//O /6i ' (Optional) Telephone: Residence ( t / 4/77-0Z.7 / ) Business/Work ( 6/9 S.2. -37v8' ) NUMBER OF YEARS YOU HAVE LIVED IN: CALIFORNIA? £fp SAN DIEGO COUNTY? NATIONAL CITY? ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER: YES ✓ NO it HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME (OTHER THAN MINOR TRAFFIC ON'N'I±,NSES) OR HAD), CIVIL JUDGEMENT (OTHER THAN A DIVORCE DECREE) ENTERED AGAINST YOU: NO: V YES: (PLEASE ATTACH SEPARATE EXPLANATION) Colleges attended and degrees held, if any: CAL- STATE L/6S Related Professional or Civic Experience: P8 A-c_ EI) nXt5 Coix-fl LvrihAn CDyrrALA-¢s N'44..1fie+r eca room'-c - Qc 1i) , tr - r 2 C.(,1 -12y> --,r� (ic2S Exawn I ' pdStM Please indicate below any further information that will be of value regarding your service on the above named boards, committees or commissions: Gtm ' a_ i i-aw,1-owv °_. Y- l JA- TI AY"' (1 arrs CdtIS 4-6 para., LA - YL C�v� n-t'-esQ DATE: . I I i d YOUR SIGNATURE RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO : CITY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL CITY 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 /nrttreteAv Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor DATE: August 29, 2001 TO: Councilmembers FROM: George H. Waters, Mayor SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE We currently have two vacancies on the Traffic Safety Committee. Mr. Randy Jacobs was currently interviewed by the City Council and would like to be considered for appointment. If there are no objections, I recommend we appoint Mr. Jacobs to the Traffic Safety Committee. This item will be placed on the City Council Agenda for the meeting of Tuesday, September 4, 2001. 11-(47 George H. Waters, Mayor ® Recycled Paper CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PURPOSE AND INTENT: It is the purpose and intent of this form to provide the City Council with as much background information as possible on those persons willing to serve on any of the Boards and Commissions of the City of National City. Please note: This application will be kept on file and under consideration for one (1) year from the date it is submitted. THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED AS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT PLEASE CHECK THE BOARD OR COMMISSION FOR WHICH YOU ARE APPLYING (You May Apply for More than One) Building Advisory & Appeals Board )(- Civil Service Commission Senior Citizens Advisory Board X Parks & Recreation Advisory Board x Serra Library Systems Board Street Tree & Parkway Committee -V Project Area Committee >a Student Commissioner Planning Commission Port Commission X Traffic Safety Committee Library Board of Trustees Sweetwater Authority San Diego County Water Authority Housing & Community Development Committee J� Name:OR-60 S RgAJJii1G ZfN D7J (Last) (First) Home Address: Birth Date 3/ 3/ l/ez--gy r23© Telephone: Residence (6/ °/ - 267- 63 3 6 ) Business/Work ( NUMBER OF YEARS YOU HAVE LIVED IN: 2- 7CALIFORNIA? �- ( SAN DIEGO COUNTY? ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER: YES X (Optional) NATIONAL CITY? 2- NO HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME (OTHER THAN MINOR TRAFFIC OFFENSES) OR HAD A CIVIL JUDGEMENT (OTHER THAN A DIVORCE DECREE) ENTERED AGAINST YOU: NO: YES: (PLEASE ATTACH SEPARATE EXPLANATION) Colleges attended and degrees held, if any: So 6' %_! u)A'$ rse:Riul Related Professional or Civic Experience: Please indicate below any further information that will be of value regarding your service on the above named boards, committees or commissions: nfri Titter pc_ s 1,9,2 c% . was rH' c,9"4f i'/s./3 PS-42,04w/ c 6r.9Wn/ Cat/✓ /%20 z//iS ,r/N 3 IZTaVY/V LJJ DATE: 7// /0/ YOUR SIGNATUR RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO : CITY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL CITY 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 Office of the Mayor 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4526 George H. Waters - Mayor DATE: August 29, 2001 TO: Councilmembers FROM: George H. Waters, Mayor SUBJECT: HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITEE We currently have one vacancy on the Housing and Community Development Committee. Ms. Rene Smith was currently interviewed by the City Council and would like to be considered for appointment. If there are no objections, I recommend we appoint Ms. -Smith to the Housing and Community Development Committee. This item will be placed on the City Council Agenda for the meeting of Tuesday, September 4, 2001. Itt George H. Waters,er Mayor ® Recycled Paper CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS PURPOSE AND INTENT: It is the purpose and intent of this form to provide the City Council with as much background information as possible on those persons willing to serve on any of the Boards and Commissions of the City of National City. Please note: This application will be kept on file and under consideration for one (1) year from the date it is submitted. THIS DOCUMENT IS FILED AS A PUBLIC DOCUMENT Building Advisory & Appeals Board Civil Service Commission Senior Citizens Advisory Board Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Serra Library Systems Board Street Tree & Parkway Committee Project Area Committee Student Commissioner PLEASE CHECK THE BOARD OR COMMISSION FOR WHICH YOU ARE APPLYING (You May Apply for More than One) Planning Commission Port Commission Traffic Safety Committee Library Board of Trustees Sweetwater Authority San Diego County Water Authority Housing & Community Development Committee o Name: al-1 `W (Last) Home Address: & -k -I 0 ' Cell.rt ,( P Telephone: Residence ( L ' y1)-1—�- ' ) Business/Work ( ) NUMBER OF YEARS YOU HAVE LIVED IN: CALIFORNIA? LA I. SAN DIEGO COUNTY? ti I ARE YOU A REGISTERED VOTER: YES ?C Birth Date/I (n(� €r ee) (First) (Optional) NATIONAL CITY? NO 9! HAVE YOU EVER BEEN CONVICTED OF A CRIME (OTHER THAN MINOR TRAFFIC ON'N'k,NSES) OR HAD A CIVIL JUDGEMENT (OTHER THAN A DIVORCE DECREE) ENTERED AGAINST YOU: NO: X YES: (PLEASE ATTACH SEPARATE EXPLANATION) Colleges attend d and degrees held, if any: Related Professional o ` ivic Expe fence: .i�vl n� u rn o nt , ( bLial --------------- Please indicate below any further information that will be of value regardi na ed boardh committees or commission: O7-(>t m L.Cel DATE: "A) 1 (D our service oh the above 7b 0 YOUR SIGNATUR RETURN COMPLETED FORM TO : CITY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL CITY 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT _eEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1 (ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS OF THE PER CAPITA PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORSHOOD, PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000. PREPARED BY Jim Ruiz//V DEPARTMENT Parks & Recreation EXPLANATION ,. This grant of $502,000 from the State, is earmarked for the rehabilitation of the pool. As you remember, on June 19, 2001, the City Council received a report on the City Pool Master Plan. The total project cost is approximately $1.9 million. At this meeting, the City Council designated these funds specifically for the pool rehab project. These funds will be combined with other funding until sufficient money is received to begin work on the pool. ♦ Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director Funds in the amount of $502,000 to be received from this grant for the rehabilitation of the pool. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approve ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below Resolution A-200 (9:991 Resolution No. 2001-132 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 132 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE PER CAPITA PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS, PARKS, CLEAN WAFER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the City Manager is hereby authorized to submit an application for $502,000 in grant funds from the State Per Capita Program under the Safe Neighborhoods, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. Said funds to be used for rehabilitation of the National City Municipal Pool. PASSED and ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2001 George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 71TEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE ROBERTI-Z'BERG-HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOOD, PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000. PREPARED BY Jim Ruiz EXPLANATION This grant of $161,305 from the State, is earmarked for the rehabilitaiton of the pool. As you remember, on June 19, 2001, the City Council received a report on the City Pool Master Plan. The total project cost is approximately $1.9 million. At this meeting, the City Council designated these funds specifically for the pool rehabilitation project. These funds will be combined with other funding until sufficient money is received to begin work on the pool. DEPARTMENT Parks & Recreation CEnvironmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director Funds in the amount of $161,305 to be received from this grant for the rehabilitation of the pool. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approve ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution Resolution No. 2001-133 A-200 (9:99) RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 133 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE ROBERTI-Z' BERG-HARRIS URBAN OPEN SPACE AND ]RECREATION PROGRAM UNDER THE SAFE NEIGHBORHOODS, PARKS, CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR AND COASTAL PROTECTION BOND ACT OF 2000 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the City Manager is hereby authorized to submit an application for $161,305 in grant funds from the Roberti-Z' Berg -Harris Urban Open Space and Recreation Program under the Safe Neighborhoods, Parks, Clean Water, Clean Air and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2000. Said funds to be used for rehabilitation of the National City Municipal Pool. PASSED and ADOPTED this 4d' day of September, 2001. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .0tEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE STATE FOR REHABILITATION OF THE MUNICIPAL POOL. PREPARED BY Jim Ruiz EXPLANATION This grant of $147,750 from the State for Local Grant Projects. The funds will be utilized, along with other grants previously received, for the pool rehabilitation project. The total grant funding received to this point from the State for the pool project is $811,055. DEPARTMENT Parks & Recreation Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Approved By: Fna ce is to Funds in the amount of $147,750 to be received from this grant for the re)taVi ration of the pool. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approve ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution A -too (9 99) 2001-134 Resolution No. RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 134 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR LOCAL GRANT FUNDS FROM THE STATE FOR REHABILITATION OF THE MUNICIPAL POOL BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the City Manager is hereby authorized to submit an application for $147,750 from the State Local Grant funds. Said funds to be used for rehabilitation of the National City Municipal Pool. PASSED and ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2001 George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Daila, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 / ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR FENCING FOR ATHLETIC FIELDS. PREPARED BY Jim Ruiz EXPLANATION This grant of $59,100 from the State for Local Grant Projects. The funds will be utilized for rehabilitation of fencing at our three major parks - Kimball Park, El Toyon Park, and Las Palmas Park. DEPARTMENT Parks & Recreation Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Finance Director Funds in the amount of $59,100 to be received from this grant for park fencing. Account No. >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approval BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Approval ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution Approved By: Resolution No. 2001-135 A-200 (9;99) RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -135 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL .CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE STATE FOR FENCING FOR ATHLETIC FIELDS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the City Manager is hereby authorized to submit an application for $59,100 from the State Local Grant funds. Said funds to be used for rehabilitation of fencing at Kimball Park, El Toyon Park and Las Palmas Park. PASSED and ADOPTED this 4d' day of September, 2001 George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .JIEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT OF THE NATIONAL CITY FEE SCHEDULE PREPARED BY KathleenJrees, Director pEPARTMENT Building & Safety EXPLANATION To avoid large user fee increases, the City Council has previously recommended more frequent, modest user fee increases to keep pace with inflation. The last City user fee review was conducted in 1995. Due to increases in labor, materials and supplies, some of the current user fees were not be sufficient to cover the cost of City services. In addition, new services have been added in which the fees have not been established. The City Council Fee Committee met in April 2001, reviewed the proposed fee recommendations of the various departments and has formulated recommendations for fee adjustments and additions for consideration by the City Council. Government Code Section 66018 of the Government Code requires that a public hearing be conducted prior to the adoption of new fees or increasing existing fees. Accordingly, it is recommended that the public hearing be scheduled for the September 18, 2001 City Council meeting. Attached is the report containing the recommendations of the City Council Fee Committee. CEnvironmental Review Financial Statement N/A N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Set the Public Hearing for September 18, 2001. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution Report on the Council Fee Committee Recommendations Fee Schedule A-200 (9;99) Resolution No. 2001 136 RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 136 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENT OF THE NATIONAL CITY FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, it has been proposed that there be approved certain adjustments to the fees charged for the provision of services by the City; and WHEREAS, Sections 66018 and 6062(a) of the California Government Code require a public hearing and ten (10) days notice prior to the enactment of any new or increased fee or change. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the time for hearing any and all persons interested in the proposed fee adjustments is hereby set for 6:00 p.m. on September 21, 2001, in the City Council Chambers in the Civic Center, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of National City, California, is hereby directed to provide notice of the time and place of said hearing in accordance with the law. PASSED and ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2001. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: L.'.ir George H. Eiser, III City Attorney REPORT ON THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FEE COMMITTEE REGARDING AMENDMENTS TO THE NATIONAL CITY FEE SCHEDULE The City Council Fee Committee has completed a review of all user fees collected by the City departments. The fee committee examined a total of 201 existing user fees. The committee looked at the costs of providing services for which specific fees are collected, as well as the fees collected by other San Diego area jurisdictions for similar fees. The fee committee is recommending that 50% of the fees remain the same, while 10% of the fees be lowered. Several fees were deleted and 37% were raised to cover the costs of providing the service. In addition the committee is recommending the following new user fees: 04-11 Business License List $ 50.00 06-52 Discretionary Permit Process -Non -Profit $ 100.00 06-53 Substantial Conformance $ 500.00 06-54 Zoning/Rebuild Letter $ 75.00 11-08 Animal Quarantine Release Animal Unaltered $ 75.00 12-27 Fire Safety Re -inspection $ 60.00 13-10 Permit Fee New Single Family Dwelling (per sq. ft.) $ .35 New Residential Attached Garage (per sq. ft.) $ .67 New Single Family Addition (per sq. ft.) $ .52 13-11 Plumbing Permit Fees New Single Family Dwelling $ 75.00 New Single Family Addition $ 20.00 13-12 Mechanical Permit Fees New Single Family Dwelling $ 30.00 New Single Family Addition $ 17.00 13-13 Electrical Permit Fees New Single Family Dwelling $ 36.00 New Single Family Addition (per sq. ft.) $ .05 13-16 Plan Check Fees New Single Family Dwelling (per sq. ft.) $ .32 New Residential Attached Garage (per sq. ft.) $ .52 New Single Family Addition (per sq. ft.) $ .47 13-20 Abandoned Building Monitoring Fee $ 100.00 41-21 Air Jumps $ 25.00 21-22 Swim Pass (30 entries) $ 30.00 In addition, the City Council Fee Committee is recommending that the Building and Safety Department use the 1999-2000 valuation schedule developed by the San Diego Area Chapter of ICBO. The Department is currently using the 1995-1996 schedule to compute the cost of construction. The rise in construction costs due to inflation is not accurately represented when using the outdated tables. A new method is being proposed for calculating residential building permit fees. This is in response to the recent lawsuits filed against other jurisdictions in California. The building permit fees for new residential construction, including garages will be calculated on a square foot basis rather than valuation as in the past. To determine the cost per square foot, the actual cost per hour for plan check and inspection in National City was determined. This number was then multiplied by the state-wide average time it takes to perform a plan check or inspection per square foot. The result is the cost per square foot to perform the plan check and the inspection. Below is a comparison of the current and new method of calculating permit fees for a 1500 square foot new single family dwelling. Valuation Method Actual Cost Method Valuation $129,000 (cost of construction) Pleck =1500 x .32 = $ 480.00 Inspection =1500 x .35 = $ 525.00 Total = $1,005.00 From the fee tables: Plan Check = $565.37 Permit = $869.80 Energy = $150.00 Total = $1,585.17 The new method better reflects the actual costs to plan check and inspect the work and in addition results in a fee reduction for new housing building permits in the city. DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION OLD NEW FEE NUMBER CITY CLERK 02-01 Audio Tapes of City Council Meetings 8.00 8 .00 Requestor's Tape 6.00 02-02 Certified Copies 5.00 deleted 02-06 City Council Minutes -Subscription 70.00 55.00 02-07 Municipal Code Books(includes updates) Non -governmental users 225.00 130.00 Governmental Users 65.00 65.00 02-08 Municipal Code Updates 50.00 50.00 CITY MANAGER 03-01 City Council Agenda Subscriptions 03-02 FINANCE 125.00 125.00 Special Event Liability Insurance Application 90.00 30.00 04-01 Business License -Duplicate 8.00 8.00 04-02 Business License -Name Change 11.00 8.00 04-03 Non-compliance Business License Audit 10.00 8.00 04-04 Business License Change Location in City 40.00 40.00 04-05 New Business License Processing Fee 40.00 40.00 04-16 Garage Sale Permit 5.00 5.00 04-07 Identification Card 10.00 10.00 04-08 Certification of Copies/Subpoena 12.00 8.00 04-09 Copies - ls` Page 1.00 1.00 Additional Pages .10 .10 04-10 1911 Bond Search 29.00 29.00 04-11 Business License List 50.00 04-15 Business License Appeals 100.00 25.00 04-16 Extension of Going Out of Business Sale 50.00 50.00 04-17 Fee Increase Notification 15.00 deleted 04-18 Return Check 1 - 10 days 25.00 25.00 10+ days T&M 35.00 Each additional 10 days 5.00 04-22 Dog License-1 year -Unaltered 20.00 20.00 04-23 Dog License-1 year -Altered 10.00 10.00 04-24 Dog License-2 year -Unaltered 30.00 30.00 04-25 Dog License-2 year -Altered 15.00 15.00 04-26 Dog License-3 year -Unaltered 40.00 40.00 04-27 Dog License-3 year -Altered 20.00 20.00 04-28 Dog License Late Charge 10.00 10.0015.00 50.00 04-29 Used Dealer State License Processing 0.00 04-30 Record Search 2.0015.0000 Over 10 minutes PLANNING 06-01 Approval of Plans -Planning Commission 750.00 750.00 06-02 Annexation 650.00 840.00 06-04 Building Conversion 750.00 deleted 06-05 Certification of Compliance 400.00 440.001,480.00 1,600.00 06-06 Code Amendment 0.00 ,481,325.00 06-07 Conditional Use Permit 1151,2.00 06-08 Environmental Impact Report 3,000.00 1,750.00 ,600.00 06-09 ; General/Specific Plan Change50.00 60.00 06-10 Home Occupation Permit 250.00 255.00 06-11 Interpretations 06-12 Initial Study (Environmental Assessment) 350.00 380.00 06-14 Large Family Day Care 200.00 200.00 06-15 Plan Check -Single Family Dwelling Alteration 50.00 50.00 06-16 Plan Check -New Single Family Dwelling 100.00 100.00 06-17 Plan Check -New Commercial/Industrial 150.00 160.00 06-18 Plan Check-Commercial/Industrial Alteration 100.00 115.00 06-19 Planned Development Permit 1,150.00 1,325.001,250.00 1,325.00 06-20 Planned Unit Development 06-21 Request to Initiate General/Specific Plan Change 424 00 5 4 90.00 06-22 Preliminary Site Plan Review 1,800.00 2,000.00 530.00 06-23 Street Vacation 1,500.00 1,825.00 06-24 Subdivision1,130.00 06-25 Tentative Parcel Map 1,100.001,00.00 2,225.00 06-26 ° Zone Change 06-27 Zone Variance 600.00 750.00.00 10.00 06-28 General Plan Text 17.00 10.00 06-29 General Plan Map/Base Map 8.00 .00 06-30 Housing Element 18.000 8.0 06-31 Design Guidelines 6.00 deleted 06-32 National City Facts 10.00 10.00t 06-33 Subdivision Ordinance 0.00 8.00 06-34 Local Coastal Plan 110.00 50.00 06-35 Land Use Code 06-36 Planning Commission Agendas 125.00 70.00 06-37 Plan Check -New Multiple -Family Dwelling 140.00 150.00 06-38 Plan Check -Multiple Family Dwelling Alteration190.00 120.00 0.00 06-39 Lot Merger 06-40 Coastal Development Permit w Public Hearing 1,100.00 1,300.00 06-41 Coastal Development Permit w/o Public Hearing 650.00 700.00 06-42 Zone Boundary Determination 400.00 400.00 06-43 Time Extension-CUP/PD/PUDNariance w 400.00 500.00 Public Hearing 06-44 Time Extension-CUP/PD/PUDNariance w/o 250.00 270.00 Public Hearing 06-45 Time Extension -Tentative Parcel Map 250.00 270.00 06-46 Time Extension -Tentative Subdivision Map 250.00 270.00 06-47 Sign Modification -Nonstructural 25.00 30.00 06-48 Banners -Processing 25.00 25.00 Not for Profit -Less Then 3 Days 0.00 0.00 06-49 Banners -Administrative Fee 500.00 250.00 06-50 Appeals -Project Processing 250.00 350.00 06-51 Appeals -Code Enforcement 100.00 200.00 Refunded if Appeal is Granted 06-52 Discretionary Permit Process -Non -Profit 100.00 06-53 Substantial Conformance 500.00 06-54 Zoning/Rebuild Letter 75.00 POLICE 11-03 False Alarms 50.00 50.00 increase $50 each time to a max of $200 11-04 Booking T&M deleted 11-05 Request for Reports 10.00 10.00 11-06 Record Check/Clearance Letter/No Record 10.00 15.00 11-07 Fingerprints 10.00 20.00 11-08 Animal Quarantine Release -Animal Altered 50.00 50.00 Animal Unaltered 75.00 11-09 Animal Relinquishment 50.00 max 50.00 At discrimination of Animal Control Officer 11-10 Dead Animal Pick-up 50.00 max 50.00 At discrimination of Animal Control Officer 11-11 DUI Accident T&M deleted 11-12 Second Response T&M $35/hr 11-13 Public School Special Events - District Sponsored $32.50/hr $30/hr Student Sponsored $26/hr $20/hr 11-16 Photograph $20+ $20+ Materials Processing 11-17 Computer Statistical Research $14/hr $15/hr `Y2 Hour Minimum 11-18 Negligent Vehicle Impound/Release 55.00 55.00 FIRE 12-01 Plan Review -Sprinklers (Improvement) 100.00 145.00 12-02 12-03 12-04 12-05 12-06 12-07 12-08 12-09 12-10 12-11 12-12 12-13 12-14 12-15 12-16, 12-17 12-18 12-20 12-21 12-22 12-23 12-24 12-25 12-26 12-27 BUILDING 13-01 13-02 13-03 13-04 13-05 13-06 13-08 13-10 Plan Review -Sprinklers (New) Plan Review -Fire Alarm System Plan review -Fire Protection Permits Underground Tank Removal Underground Tank Installation Aboveground Tank Installation Weed Abatement Training -CPR Fire Ground Stand-by Fire Department Stand-by Arson Fire Suppression Environmental Fire Suppression Malicious False Alarm Response False Alarm Response Hazardous Material Incident Response Complaints -Noncompliance Arson Investigation Technical Services Plan Check -New Commercial/Industrial Plan Check-Commercial/Industrial Alteration 41.00 Plan Check -Multiple Family Dwelling 75.00 Plan Check -Multiple Family Dwelling Alteration 48.00 Fire Safety Inspection -Hazardous Occupation 25.00 Fire Safety Re -inspection 260.00 105.00 65.00 65.00 60.00 90.00 60.00 465.00 15.00 T&M T&M T&M T&M 230.00 230.00 T&M 140.00 T&M T&M 80.00 & SAFETY Temporary Use Permit -Class A (T&M to max) Building Moving Fees Demolition Permit Temporary Use Permit -Class B Appeal to Advisory & Appeals Board Plan Maintenance + Per page Microfilm Copy + Per page Permit Fees Application Fee Valuation Fee $1-$500 15.00 15.00 $500-$2,000 (1st $500) 17.30 17.30 (each additional $100) 2.20 2.20 $2,001-$25,000 (1st $2,000) 57.80 57.80 (each additional $1,000) 9.00 9.00 $25,001-$50,000 (1st $25,000) 285.00 285.00 245.00 105.00 70.00 85.00 80.00 110.00 80.00 300.00 15.00 T&M T&M T&M T&M 250.00 250.00 T&M 140.00 T&M T&M 90.00 50.00 75.00 75.00 60.00 60.00 345.00 360.00 135.00 85.00 60.00 50.00 95.00 65.00 110.00 175.00 6.00 15.00 1.00 .25 6.00 2.00 .25 .25 15.00 15.00 (each additional $1,000) 7.80 7.80 $50,001-$100,000 (1st $50,000) 4810.00 481.00 (each additional $1,000) 5.30 5.30 $100,001-$500,000 (1st $100,000) 748.00 748.00 (each additional $1,000) 4.20 4.20 $500,001-$1,000,000 (1st $500,000) 2377.00 2377.00 (each additional $1,000) 3.40 3.40 over $1,000,000 (1st $1,000,000) 4070.00 4070.00 (each additional $1.000) 2.40 2.40 New Single Family Dwelling (per sq. ft.) .35 New Residential Garage (per sq. ft.) .67 New Single Family Addition (per sq. ft.) .52 13-11 Plumbing Permit Fees Plumbing Filing Fee 15.00 20.00 Plumbing Fixtures (each) 4.00 4.00 Gas Outlets (1-5) 6.00 6.00 Gas Outlets (over 5) (each) 1.00 1.00 Building Sewer 11.00 11.00 Water line (new, repair, alteration) 4.00 4.00 Drain line (new, repair, alteration) 4.00 4.00 New Single Family Dwelling (each) 75.00 Single Family Addition (each) 20.00 13-12 Mechanical Permit Fees Mechanical Filing Fee 15.00 20.00 HVAC (all heating/cooling units) 11.00 11.00 Appliance Vent or Single Room Fan 6.00 6.00 Boiler Compressor To 3 hp & 100k/Btu 11.00 11.00 To 15 hp & 500k/Btu 21.00 21.00 To 30 hp & 1,000kBtu 28.50 28.50 To 50 hp & 1,750kBtu 40.00 40.00 To +50 hp & + 1,750kBtu 56.00 56.00 Exhaust Hood 12.00 12.00 Domestic Incinerator 13.00 13.00 Commercial Incinerator 50.00 50.00 Other Equipment 8.00 8.00 New Single Family Dwelling (each) 30.00 Single Family Addition (each) 17.00 13-13 Electrical Permit Fees Permit Filing Fee 20.00 20.00 New/Replace Service Entrance To 100 amps 35.00 35.00 To 200 amps 55.00 55.00 To 400 amps 95.00 95.00 Each additional amp over 400 .21 .21 Temporary Power Pole 10.00 10.00 New Circuits Other Equipment New Single Family Dwelling (each) Single Family Addition (per sq. ft) 13-14 Inspections After Hours Inspection Re -inspection Fee 13-15 Revisions to Approved Plans (per hour) 13-16 Plan Check Fees (% of Permit Fees) New Single Family Dwellings (per sq. ft.) New Residential Garage (per sq. ft.) New Residential Additions (per sq. ft) 13-17 Repetitive Plan Checks for Tracts (% of Plan Check Fee) 13-18 State Energy Regulations Plan Check (per sq. ft.) Residential Commercial/Industrial 13-19 State Disabled Access Plan Check Fee (% of Plan Check Fee) Abandoned Building Monitoring Fee 13-20 10.00 ENGINEERING 21-04 Records of Survey 21-05 Encroachment Agreement 21-06 Special Driveway Permit 21-08 Easement Check 21-09 Lot Line Adjustment 21-11 Sidewalk, Driveway, Curb Permit 21-12 Deferrals 21-23 Sewer Permit 21-25 Flood Hazard Area Permit 21-26 Construction Permit 21-27 Annual Parking District Renewal Permit 21-28 Traffic Impact Plan Review 21-30 Plan Copy Service 21-31 Plan Check -Single Family Dwelling Alteration 21-32 Plan Check -New Single Family Dwelling 21-33 Plan Check-Commercial/Industrial Alteration 21-34 Plan Check -New Commercial/Industrial 21-35 Final Subdivision Map 21-36 Final Parcel Map 21-37 Plan Check -New Multiple Family Dwelling 21-38 Plan Check -Multiple Family Dwelling Alteration180 00 5.00 21-39 Utility Company Permit 185.0020 21-40 Engineering Compliance Fee 10.00 60.00 40.00 40.00 65% 20% .10 .05 5% 210.00 200.00 155.00 185.00 570.00 80.00 200.00 60.00 100.00 150.00 10.00 250.00 5.00 60.00 100.00 85.00 125.00 T&M T&M 120.00 10.00 10.00 36.00 .05 60.00 40.00 40.00 65% .32 .52 .47 20% delete .05 5% 100.00 260.00 205.00 180.00 190.00 625.00 50.00 245.00 70.00 100.00 200.00 15.00 275.00 5.00 50.00 100.00 100.00 130.00 T&M T&M 120.00 100.00 150.00 225.00 21-41 Investigation 70.00 85.00 PARKS AND RECREATION 41-01 Recreation Swimming 1.50 1.50 41-02 Learn to Swim Program -Resident 25.00 25.00 41-03 Learn to Swim Program -Nonresident 40.00 40.00 41-04 Athletic Field Lights -Resident 20.00 40.00 41-05 Athletic Field Lights -Nonresident 25.00 50.00 41-08 Tiny Tots -Resident 40.00 40.00 41-09 Tiny Tot -Nonresident 60.00 60.00 41-10 Contractual Classes Revenue Sharing Instructor 80% 80% City 20% 20% 41-12 Street Tree Removal 34.00 50.00 41-13 Basketball League -Resident 287.00 287.00 41-14 Basketball League -Nonresident 307.00 307.00 41-16 Adult Noon Swim 1.50 1.50 41-17 National City Swim Club per month 300.00 300.00 41-18 Master's Swim Club per month 100.00 100.00 41-19 High School Aquatic Teams per hour 20.00 20.00 41-20 Other AAU Swim Teams per hour/2 hr min. 5.00 5.00 41-21 Air Jumps 25.00 41-22 Swim Pass (30 entries) 30.00 San Diego Area Chapter International Conference of Building Official Carlsbad. Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon. El Centro, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City; Oceanside, Poway, San Diego City, San Diego County, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Temecula, Vista MEMORANDUM DATE: June 15, 1999 FROM: Bronson Rideout, Chairman TO: San Diego Area Chapter SUBJECT: 1999-2000 Valuation Schedule • The task of determining the value of construction is mandated to be the responsibility of the Building Official by Section 107.2 of the 1994 Uniform Building Code. Since 1987 the San Diego Chapter has endeavored to assist . the Building Departments within the Chapter by preparing recommended valuation multipliers that can be used by the Building Official in carrying out the responsibilities of that section. The valuation schedule is not only used by local Building Departments, but is used by various other agencies, newspapers, magazines, the County Tax Assessor as well as the design and construction industry. It is a document which should be kept active and updated each year. The chapter met on June 15, 1999 and voted to accept the building valuation figures contained in the attached tables. The chapter accepted these values as a recognized industry standard with the understanding that each individual jurisdiction may or may not adopt some or all of the values based on the administrative policies of each individual jurisdiction. The unit valuations contained in the proposed schedule are based upon costs published in the March/April 1999 issue of the Building Standards magazine by the International Conference of Building Officials. Almost all of the listed multipliers increased from last year, with the average building valuation increase being 2.0%. The value of wood frame single family dwellings increased from $84.00 to $86.00 per square foot. Continuing with the procedure established in 1987, in an effort to provide a more equitable and consistent method of computing the miscellaneous valuations, the new miscellaneous valuations have been calculated based upon the overall percent change from the 1985-1986 schedule. Using the 1985-1986 valuations as the base year, the proposed 1999-2000 miscellaneous valuations have been increased 40.7% from the 1985-1986 values, and rounded off as shown in the schedule. June 15, 1999 Valuation Committee Report Page 2 As stated above, this schedule was approved for use during the next fiscal year by all the San Diego area jurisdictions present at the June 15, 1999 meeting. Respectfully submitted; Bronson Rideout, Chairman Valuation Committee Members: Gina Adams Kathleen Trees Elaine Maxwell Bronson Rideout Dan Pavao Dick Esgate San Diego Area Chapter International Conference of Building Officials Proposed Building Valuation Multipliers for 1999-2000 Effective Date - July 1,1999 Value Occupancy and Type Per Sq Ft 1999-2000 Apartment Houses $101.00 * Type IorII-F.R. ,1c2A0 Type V or III (Masonry) $76.00 Type V Wood Frame $ 00 Type I Basement Garage Banks $137.00 * Type I or II-F.R $101.00 Type II 1-I bur $0.00 Type II-N $111.00 Type III 1-I bur $107.00 Type IINV $101.00 Type V 1-Hour $97 00 Type V-N Car Washes Type III 1-Hour $65.00 $62.00 Type III-N $55.00 Type V 1-Hour $51.00 Type V-N Churches $92.00 Type I or ll-F.R. $69.00 00 Type II 1-Hour $66.00 00 Type II-N $75.00 Type III 1-Hour $72.00 Type IIMI $70.00 Type V 1-Hour $66.00 Type V-N Convalescent Hospitals 00 * Type I or II-F.R. $12129 A0 Type II 1-Hour$92 00 Type III 1-Hour $86.00 Type V 1-Hour 7-1-99 -1- Occupancy and Type Dwellings *** Type V Adobe Type V Masonry Type V Wood Frame Basements (semi -finished) Additions - Wood Frame Solariums Cabana - Pool house - Type V-N Value Per Sq Ft 1999-2000 $113.00 $90.00 $86.00 $22.00 $103.00 $86.00 $79.00 Fire Stations Type I or II-F.R. $106.00 Type II 1-Hour $70.00 Type II-N $66.00 Type II11-Hour $76.00 Type IIHU $73.00 Type V 1-Hour $71.00 Type V-N $68.00 Fitness Centers * Type I or II-F.R. $99.00 Type 111-Four $66.00 Type il-N $63.00 Type III 1-Hour $71.00 Type III-N $68.00 Type V 1-Hour $67.00 Type V-N $63.00 Homes for the Elderly Type I or II-F.R. $96.00 Type II 1-Hour $78.00 Type il-N $75.00 Type III 1-Hour $81.00 Type III-N $78.00 Type V 1-Hour $79.00 Type V-N $76.00 Hospitals * Type I or II-F.R Type III 1-Hour Type V 1-Hour $151.00 $125.00 $119.00 -2- 7-1-99 Occupancy and Type Hotels & Motels * Type I or II-F.R. Type III 1-Hour Type III-N Type V 1-Hour Type V-N Industrial Plants Type I or II-F.R. Type II 1-bur Type II (Stock) Typellli-Hour Type III-N Tikip Type V 1-Hour Type V-N Medical Offices * Type I or II-F.R. Type II 1-Hour Type II-N Type III i-Hour Type III-N Type V 1-Hour Type V-N Offices * Type I or II-F.R. Type ill -Hour Type II-N Type III 1-Hour Type ill-N Type V 1-Hour Type V-N Private Garages Wood Frame - Finished Wood Frame - Unfinished Masonry Open Carports Value Per Sq Ft 1999-2000 $94.00 $81.00 $77.00 $70.00 $69.00 $53.00 $37.00 $34.00 $40.00 $38.00 $28.00 $38.00 $35.00 $111.00 $85.00 $81.00 $90.00 $86.00 $83.00 $81.00 $99.00 $66.00 $63.00 $71.00 $68.00 $67.00 $63.00 $24.00 $23.00 $25.00 $15.00 -3- 7-1-99 Occupancy and Type Value Per Sq Ft 1999-2000 Public Buildings * Type l or II-F.R. $114.00 Type I11-hour $92.00 Type li-N $88.00 Type III 1-Hour $96.00 Type Ill-N $93.00 Type V 1-Hour $88.00 Type V-N $85 00 Public Garages * Type I or II-F.R. * Type I or II Open Parking Type II-N Type III 1!Hour Type III-N Type V 1-Hour $45.00 $34.00 $27.00 $34.00 $31.00 $31.00 Restaurants Type III 1-Hour $90.00 Type NI-N $87.00 Type V 1-Hour $83.00 Type V-N $79.00 Schools Type I or II-F.R. $103.00 Type 111-hour $70.00 Type 1111-Hour $75.00 Type III-N $72.00 Type V 1-Hour $70.00 Type V-N $67.00 Service Stations Type 11-N $62.00 Type I111-Hour $66 00 Type V 1-Hour $55.00 Canopies $26.00 Stores * Type I or II-F.R. Type II 1-Hour Type II-N Type III 1-Hour Type Ill-N Type V 1-Hour Type V-N Retail Garden Center - Type V-N $76.00 $47.00 $46.00 $57.00 $53.00 $48.00 $44.00 $36.00 -4- 7-1-99 Value Occupancy and Type Per Sq Ft 1999-2000 Theatres $102.00 Type I or II-F.R. $74.00 Type Ill 1-1-lour $70.00 Type Ill-N Type V 1-Hour $66$70.00 00 Type V-N Warehouses ** $46 .00 Type I or II-F.R. $27.00 Type II 1-Hour $26.00 Type II-N $31.00 Type III 1-Hour $29.00 00 Type Ill-N .00 Type V 1-Hour $27$26.00 Type V-N Equipment $3� Air Conditioning (Commercial) $320 Jr Conditioning (Residential) $2.40 Sprinkler Systems Building Valuation Data The valuations shown were formulated by taking the unit cost per square foot and multiplying it by a regional modifier (1.00) and rounding off to the nearest dollar. This building valuation data is contained in the Mardi -April 1999 issue of the Building Standards Magazine, published by the International Conference of Building Officials. * Add 0.5 percent to the total cost for each story over three. ** Deduct 11 percent for mini -warehouses. *** For subdivisions with 10 or more single-family dwellings which have plancheck and building permit issuances in groups of 10 or more, the valuation or the plancheck and building permit fees may be decreased by 10 percent. -5- 7-1-99 Miscellaneous The following items do not appear in the Standards. The proposed 1999-2000 values increased 2.0% above the previous 1998-1999 values. The values shown are rounded to the nearest $.25, $.50, $1.00, $25.00 or $50.00 where appropriate. AUTHORITY TO DETERMINE VALUE -1994 UBC Section 107.2 The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this code shall be made by the building official. The value to be used in computing the building permit and building plan review fees shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire -extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. ADDITIONS Additions to any building or structure shall be valued at 120% of the value for a new building of the same occupancy and type of construction. Value 1999-2000 AGRICULTURAL BUILDING $0.00 /sq.ft. ALUMINUM SIDING ANTENNAS Radio, over 30ft. in height Dish,10ft. dia. w/decoder $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 each $0.00 each AWNING OR CANOPY (supported by building) Aluminum $0.00 /sq.ft. Canvas $0.00 /sq.ft. BALCONY $0.00 /sq.ft. CLOSE EXTERIOR WALL OPENING $0.00 /sq ft DECKS (Wood) $0.00 /sq.ft. DEMOLITION OF BUILDING $0.00 /sq.ft. FENCE OR FREESTANDING WALL Wood or Chain Link Wood Frame with Stucco Wre Masonry Wrought hen FIREPLACES Concrete or Masonry Prefabricated Metal $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 each $0.00 each 6 7-1-99 Value 1999-2000 FOUNDATION ONLY A foundation only permit for a structure shall be valued at 25% of the value of the whole building. The permit for the remainder of the building shall be based upon a value of 75% of the building. $0.00 /sq.ft. GREENHOUSE $0.00 /lin.ft. INTERIOR PARTITION INSTALL WINDOW OR $0.00 /sq.ft. SLIDING GLASS DOOR MANUFACTURED HOUSING (25% of value of "site -built" house)$0.00 /sq.ft. PATIO $0.00 /sq.ft. Wood Frame with Cover $0.00 /sq.ft. Metal Frame with Cover $0.00 /sq.ft. Wood Frame - Cover and Walls $0.00 /sq.ft. Metal Frame - Cover and Walls $0.00 /sgft. Screen or Plastic Walls PILE FOUNDATIONS $0,00 /lin.ft. cast -in -Place Concrete $0.00 /lin.ft. Steel PLASTERING $0,00 /sq.ft. Outsidede $0.00 /sq.ft. RELOCATED BUILDINGS (Fee same as for new buildings) RETAINING WALL Concrete or Masonry $0.00 /sq.ft. REROOFING (1 square = 100 square feet) /sq. Buirt-up $0.00$0.00 /sq. Cornposl'ion Shingles $0.00 /sq. Fiberglass Shingles Asbestos -Cement Shingles $0.00 /s. $0 00 /sqq Wood Shingles $0.00 /sq. Wood Shakes $0.00 /sq. Aluminum Shingles $0.00 /sq. Clay Tile $0.00 /sq. Concrete Tile $0.00 /sq.ft. ROOF STRUCTURE REPLACEMENT 7 7-1 -99 Value 1999-2000 SAUNAS (Steam) $0.00 each SHELL BUILDINGS A shell building is defined as a building for which HVAC, lighting, suspended ceilings, plumbing and electrical systems, partition layouts and interior finish are not shown on the plans and for which separate tenant improvement plans will be submitted for plan check at a later date showing these items. Warehouses and industrial buildings shall not be considered shell buildings. The valuation for shell buildings shall be taken as 80 percent of the valuation for the completed building. SIGNS AND BILLBOARDS ROOF SIGN 1 Face 2 Face WALL SIGN 1 Face Non -Illuminated Signs and Billboards $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. PROJECTING SIGN 1 Face 2 Face $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. POLE SIGN (Values plus supporting structure) 1 Face 2 Face $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. BILLBOARDS (Values plus supporting structures) 1 Face 2 Face $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. ROOF SIGN 1 Face 2 Face WALL SIGN 1 Face PROJECTING SIGN 1 Face 2 Face Illuminated Signs and Billboarth POLE SIGN (Values plus supporting structure) 1 Face 2 Face $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. 8 7-1 -99 BILLBOARDS (Values plus supporting structures) 1 Face 2 Face SUPPORTING STRUCTURE SOLAR Value plus plumbing, electrical, water and heating Plan Check Fee One Bu&iing Additional building at same location Building Permit Fee (Per gross floor area of collector) First 100 square feet Collector area over 100 sq ft Reinspection Fee SPA OR JACUZZI STAIRS STONE AND BRICK VENEER STORAGE RACKS (per cubic foot) SWIMMING POOL (per sq.ft. of surface area) Vinyl bred Gunke Fberglass Value 1999-2000 $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 MR. $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 each $0.00 each $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /cu.ft. TENANT IMPROVEMENTS (Other) TENANT IMPROVEMENTS (Higher) The valuation of tenant improvements shall be based on one of the following: 1. $41.00 for banks, churches, medical offices, restaurants and hazardous "H" occupancies. 2. $29.00 for other Tenant Improvements such as stores and offices. 3. An actual construction cost estimate (See attached form). $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. $0.00 /sq.ft. 9 7-1-99 ICBO-TI COST ESTIMATE REMODEL OR TENANT IMPROVEMENT CONSTRUCTION VALUATION The Building Official is mandated by State law to determine the value of work proposed in each application for a Building Permit.. The value to be used shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued as well as all finished work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. Uniform Building Code Section 107.2 APPLICANT PLEASE COMPLETE SITE ADDRESS PLAN CHECK NO. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK AREA OF ❑ REMODEL ❑ TENANT IMPROVEMENT ❑ ADDITION PROPOSED WORK INCLUDES: NEW SUSPENDED CEILING 0 YES ❑ NO NEW HVAC ❑ YES 0 NO NEW FIRE SPRINKLERS 0 YES 0 NO NEW PARTITIONS ❑ YES ❑ NO NEW PLUMBING ❑ YES ❑ NO NEW ELECTRICAL ❑ YES ❑ NO Has a contractor estimate been received for the proposed work? ❑ YES ❑ NO Itemized cost estimate is attached El YES ❑ NO I certify the value of all proposed construction work covered by the permit application including: all structural. work, finish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, elevators, fire extinguishing systems, and all permanent equipment is: $ THIS VALUE IS BASED ON ❑ DESIGNER'S ESTIMATE ❑ CONTRACTOR'S ESTIMATE ❑ OTHER, DESCRIBE BASIS THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS TRUE AND CORRECT SIGNATURE ❑ APPLICANT DATE - ❑ DESIGNER ❑ CONRACTOR PLAN CHECKER USE ONLY THE VALUE IS ACCEPTABLE ❑ YES ❑ NO AN ITEMIZED COST BREAKDOWN IS REQUIRED TO CONFIRM THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION VALUE. ❑ YES ❑ NO BY: DATE: BUILDING VALUATION DATA At the request of numerous building officials, Building Standards offers the following building valuation data representing average costs for most buildings. Because residential buildings are the most common for many cities, two general classes are considered for these, one for "average" construction and the other for "good." Adjustments should be made for special architectural or structural features and the location of the project. Niger or lower unit costs may often result. The unit costs are intended to comply with the definition of "valuation" in Section 223 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code" and thus include architectural, structural, electrical, plumbing and mechanical work, except as specifically listed below. The unit costs also include the contractor's profit, which should not be omitted. The determination of plan check fees for projects reviewed by the International Conference of Building Officials will be based on valuation computed from these figures, which were established in April 1999. Cost per Square Occupancy and Type Foot, Average 1. APARTMENT HOUSES: Type I or II F.R.* $82.20 (Good) $101.00 Type V-Masonry (or Type III) 67.20 (Good) $82.10 Type V-Wood Frame59.00 (Good) $75.90 Type I -Basement Garage 34.70 2. AUDITORIUMS: Type I or II F.R. 97.00 Type II-1-Hour 70.20 Type II-N 66.50 Type III-1-Hour 73.80 Type III-N 70.00 Type V-1-Hour `70.60 Type V-N 65.90 3. BANKS: Type I or II F.R.* 136.90 Type II-1-Hour 100.90 Type II-N 97.70 Type Ill-1-Hour 111.40 Type III-N 107.40 Type V-1-Hour 100.90 Type V-N 96.70 4. BOWLING ALLEYS: Type II-1-Hour 47.20 Type II-N 44.10 Type III-1-Hour 51.30 Type III-N 48.10 Type V-1-Hour 34.70 5. CHURCHES: Type I or II F.R. 91.80 Type II-1-Hour 68.90 Type II-N 65.50 Type III-1-Hour 74.90 Type Ill-N 71.60 Type V-1-Hour 70.00 Type V-N 65.90 6. CONVALESCENT HOSPITALS: Type I or II F.R.* 128.70 Type II-1-Hour 89.30 Type III-1-Hour 91.60 Type V-1-Hour 86.40 Cost per Square Occupancy and Type Foot, Average Cost per Square Occupancy and Type Foot, Average 13. JAILS: Type I or II F.R. $147.10 Type III-1-Hour 134.40 Type V-1-Hour 100.90 14. LIBRARIES: Type I or II F.R. 107.70 Type II-1-Hour 78.80 Type II-N 74.90 Type III-1-Hour 83.20 Type Ill-N 79.00 Type V-1-Hour 78.20 Type V-N 74.90 15. MEDICAL OFFICES: Type I or II F.R.* 110.50 Type II-1-Hour 85.30 Type II-N 81.00 Type III-1-Hour 89.80 Type Ill-N 86.20 Type V-1-Hour 83.40 Type V-N 80.50 16. OFFICES**: Type I or II F.R.* 98.70 Type II-1-Hour 66.20 Type II-N 63.00 Type ill-1-Hour 71.40 Type III-N 68.20 Type V-1-Hour 66.90 Type V-N 63.00 17. PRIVATE GARAGES: Wood Frame 22.50 Masonry 25.40 Open Carports 15.30 18. PUBLIC BUILDINGS: Type I or II F.R.* 114.10 Type II-1-Hour 92.40 Type Il-N 88.40 Type III-1-Hour 96.00 Type Ill-N 92.60 Type V-1-Hour 87.90 Type V-N 84.70 19. PUBLIC GARAGES: Type I or II F.R.* 45.20 Type I or II Open Parking*34.00 Type II-N 26.50 Type III-1-Hour 34.30 Type III-N 30.50 Type V-1-Hour 31.20 *Add 0.5 percent to total cost for each story over three. **Deduct 20 percent for shell -only buildings. ***Deduct 11 percent for mini -warehouses. REGIONAL MODIFIERS • The following modifiers are recommended for use in conjunction with the building valuation data. a rAd iitiol aly, certain local. For example,toadjust the costireoffurther a Type dI fications. To use these modifiers, merely multiply the listed cost per square foot by the appropriate One -hour hotel building of average construction for the Iowa area, select Regional Modifier 0.80 and unit cost from valuation data, $80.90: 0.80 x 80.90 a $64.72 (adjusted cost per square foot) Eastern U.S. Modifier Eastern U.S. (cont.) Modifier Central U.S. (cont.) Modifier 74 Western U.S. Modifier 1.30 Connecticut 0.95 Pennsylvania0ona 0.82 Delaware 0.84 Philadelphia 0.96 Kentucky 0.78 0.74 AA rizoornia District of Columbia 0.87 Other 0.83 Louisiana1.00 Florida 0.74 Rhode Island 0.94 Michigan 0.84 Los Angeles Georgia 0.68 South Carolina 0.70 Minnesota 0.86 San Francisco 1.00 0.94 Maine 0.81 Vermont 0.80 Mississippi 0.71 Other 0.94 Maryland 0.79 Virginia 0.73 Missouri 0.78 Colorado 1.14 Massachusetts 0.94 West Virginia 0.82 Nebraska 0.7-5 Hawaii New Hampshire 0.82 North Dakota 0.80 Idaho 0 80 .80 New Jersey0.91Ohio 0.80 Montana 0 89 CentralAlabamaU.S. Oklahoma 0.71 Nevada New York aa0.72 South Dakota 0.78 New Mexico 0.76 New York City 0.87 Arkansas 0.700.72 Oregon 0.83 OtherC0.87 IllinoisIndiana 0.87 Texasssee 0.74 Utah 0.75 North Carolina 0.70 w0.820.85 Washington 0.88 Iowa 0.80 Wisconsin Wyoming 0.80 Cost per Square Occupancy and Type Foot, Average 7. DWEWNGS: Type V-Masonry $70.00 (Good) $89.70 Type pGo od F0 V-Woodj me62.30 Basements - Semi -Finished 18.60 (Good) $21.50 Unfinished 13.50 (Good) $16.40 8. FIRE STATIONS: Type I or II F.R. 105.90 Type II-1-Hour 69.60 Type II-N 65.70 Type III-1-Hour 76.30 Type III-N 73.00 Type V-1-Hour 71.40 Type V-N 67.90 9. HOMES FOR THE ELDERLY: Type I or II F.R. 96.00 Type II-1-Hour 78.00 Type II-N 74.60 Type Ill-1-Hour 81.10 Type III-N 77.90 Type V-i-Hour 78.50 Type V-N 75.70 10. HOSPITALS: Type I or II ER.* 151.00 Type III-1-Hour 125.00 Type V-1-Hour 119.20 11. HOTELS, AND MOTELS: Type I or II F.R.* 93.50 Type III-1-Hour 80.90 Type Ill-N 77.20 Type V-1-Hour 70.40 Type V-N 69.00 12. INDUSTRIAL PLANTS: Type I or II F.R. 52.70 Type II-1-Hour 36.70 Type II-N 33.70 Type III-1-Hour 40.40 Type III-N 38.00 Tilt -up 27.60 Type V-1-Hour 38.00 Type V-N 34.90 20. RESTAURANTS: Type III-1-Hour $90.20 Type III-N 87.10 Type V-1-Hour 82.50 Type V-N 79.40 21. SCHOOLS: Type I or II F.R. 102.90 Type II-1-Hour 70.20 Type III-1-Hour 75.10 Type Ill-N 72.30 Type V-1-Hour 70.40 Type V-N 67.20 22. SERVICE STATIONS: Type II-N 62.20 Type Ill-1-Hour 64.80 Type V-1-Hour 55.20 Canopies 25.90 23. STORES: Type I or 11 F.R.* 76.30 Type II-1-Hour 46.70 Type II-N 45.50 Type III-1-Hour 56.70 Type III-N 53.20 Type V-1-Hour 47.80 Type V-N 44.20 24. THEATERS: Type I or II ER. 101.60 Type III-1-Hour 74.00 Type III-N 70.40 Type V-1-Hour 69.70 Type V-N 65.90 25. WAREHOUSES***: Types or II F.R. 45.70 Type II or V-1-Hour 27.10 Type II or V-N 25.50 Type III-1-Hour 30.80 Type III-N 29.40 EQUIPMENT AIR CONDITIONING: Commercial 3.80 Residential 3.20 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS2.40 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .4EETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 7.ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AWARDING A CONTRACT TO" RANDALL CONSTRUCTION FOR THE J. LOUIS CAMACHO RECREATION CENTER REHABILITATION PROJECT, SPECIFICATION NO. 00-11 AND REAPPROPRIATING $5,497.45 FROM ACCOUNT NO. 001-409-598-1139 TO ACCOUNT NO. 001-409-500-598-1548 PREPARED BY Michael Long DEPARTMENT Engineering EXPLANATION On August 9, 2001, two bids were received and opened for the J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Rehabilitation Project, Specification No. 00-11. The project includes the sandblasting, priming, and painting of the concrete gymnasium walls, painting through -out the interior of the building, replacement of all damaged 2X4 acoustic ceiling panels, and application of an elastomeric coating to the exterior of the building. Staff has reviewed all the proposals and found the lowest responsive bidder, Randall Construction, qualified to perform the work. $5,497.45 was left over in account number 000-409-500-598-1139 from the reroofing of the J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Project. This funding would be helpful to provide an adequate contingency for this project and the possibility of including additive bid items as funding allows. The total cost of the project is estimated to be $56,725.35. This amount includes the construction base bid price of $47,748.00 plus approximately 20% ($8,977.35) for inspection and contingencies. This award is for the base bid only and additive bid items will be awarded by change order as funds allow. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The total cost of the project is estimated to be $56,725.35. Funding is available through Account N aers 001-409-500-598-1548 (with reappropriation) and 301-409-500- 598-1548. /% �/`Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATIO ri' Pd Adopt the Resoluti1.,i1p1 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Resolution 2. Bid Opening Sheet 3. Bid Result Spreadsheet 00-11 A-200 (9/80) Resolution No. RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - 137 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AWARDING A CONTRACT TO RANDALL CONSTRUCTION FOR THE J. LOUIS CAMACHO RECREATION CENTER REHABILITATION PROJECT AND APPROVING THE REAPPROPRIATION OF FUNDS (SPEC. NO. 00-11) WHEREAS, the Engineering Department of the City of National City did, in open session on August 9, 2001, publicly open, examine and declare all sealed bids for the J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Rehabilitation Project, Specification No. 00-11; and WHEREAS, $5,497.45 was left over in Account No. 001-409-598-1139 from the reproofing of the J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Project which would be helpful to provide an adequate contingency for the Rehabilitation Project (Account No. 001-409-500- 598-1548). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby awards the contract for the to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, to wit: RANDALL ENGINEERING BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City a contract between Randall Engineering and the City of National City for the J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Rehabilitation Project. Said contract is on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the following reappropriation and transfer of funds: FROM: TO: Account No. 001-409-598-1139 • J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Project Account No. 001-409-500-598-1548 J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Rehabilitation Project TOTAL AMOUNT: $5,497.45 PURPOSE: To provide an adequate contingency fund. Resolution No. 2001 - 137 September 4, 2001 Page Two PASSED and ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2001 George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Vg George H. Eiser, HI City Attorney August 9, kuOl Final Bid Results for: J. Louis Camacho Recreation Center Rehabilitation Project, Specification No. 00-11 RANDALL CONST. KIRK PAVING RANK 1 2 NO. ITEM QNTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT;- UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Mobilization 1 LS $ 2,350.00, $ 2,350.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 2 Sandblast,Prime,Paint, Concrete Gymnasium Walls 1 LS $ 29,806.00 $ 29,806.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000.00 3 Paint Interior 1 LS $ 3,660.00 $ 3,660.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 4 Replace T-Bar 2x4 Panels 1 LS $ 952.00 $ 952.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 5 Elastomeric Coating 1 LS $ 10,980.00 $ 10,980.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 14,000.00 BASE BID TOTAL $ 47,748.00 $ 57,000.00 ADDITIVE BID ITEMS A Replace Flooring 1 LS $ 3,628.00 $ 3,628.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 6,000.00 B Replace Window Cells (Glass Block) 1 LS $ 2,550.00 $ 2,550.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 C Lighting in Restrooms 4 EA $ 336.00 $ 1,344.00 $ 300.00 $ 1,200.00 D Exterior Lighting 1 EA $ 1,037.00 $ 1,037.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 ADDITIVE ITEMS TOTAL $ 8,559.00 $10,700.00 BASE BID TOTAL $ 47,748.00 $ 57,000.00 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $ 40,000:00 $ 40,000.00 PERCENT UNDER/OVER ESTIMATE 19.37% 42.50% BID OPENING SPECIFICATION NUMBER: 00-11 PROJECT TITLE: J. LOUIS CAMACHO RECREATION CENTER REHABILITATION PROJECT OPENING DATE: THURSDAY, AUGUST 9, 2001 TIME: 3:00 P.M. ESTIMATE: $40,000 PROJECT ENGINEER: MICHAEL LONG NO. BIDDER'S NAME (PAGE 13 OR 14) BID AMOUNT (PAGE 15 ) ADDENDA (PAGE 13) BID SECURITY (PAGE (PAGE 19 BOND) 1. Randall Construction 3656 Ruffing Road, Suite D San Diego, CA 92123 $47,748.00 Bond 2. Kirk Paving, Inc. 7590 El Cajon Boulevard, Suite D La Mesa, CA 91941 $57,000.00 Bond BID 0011 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. (-ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR SANDBLAST MATERIALS STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BAY MARINA DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 335 FEET WEST OF HARRISON AVENUE/BAY MARINA WAY (APPLICANT: KLEEN BLAST.) (CASE FILE NO.: CDP-2001-1) PREPARED BY Andrew Hoskinson�DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The Council voted to approve this item at the August 21, 2001 public hearing. The attached resolution is necessary to follow through on the action. Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A N/A Negative Declaration Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS Resolution A-200 (5/80) ( Listed Below ) 2001-138 Resolution No. RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -138 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A SAND BLAST MATERIALS STORAGE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITY ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF BAY MARINA DRIVE APPROXIMATELY 335 FEET WEST OF HARRISON AVENUE/BAY MARINA WAY APPLICANT: ABEL PARRA FOR KLEEN BLAST ABRASIVES CASE FILE NO. CDP-2001-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City considered a Coastal Development Permit application for a sand blast materials storage and distribution facility on the south side of Bay Marina Drive approximately 335 feet west of Harrison Avenue/Bay Marina Way at the regularly scheduled City Council meetings of July 17, and August 21, 2001, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing the City Council considered the staff report prepared for Case File Nos. CDP-2001-1 and IS-2001-1 which is maintained by the City, and incorporated herein by reference; and WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State and City law; and WHEREAS, this action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the City Council at the public hearings held on July 17, and August 21, 2001, support the following findings: 1. That granting of the Cnastal Development Permit is in conformity with the Certified Local Coastal Program, since the proposed sandblast material storage and distribution facility is an industrial use consistent with the Ural Coastal Land Use Plan designation of Medium Manufacturing -Coastal Zone (MM-CZ) applicable to the property. 2. That granting of the Coastal Development Permit is consistent with all other plans and ordinances of the City, since the General Plan identifies this area for medium manufacturing uses and since the project complies with all Land Use Code requirements. Resolution No. 2001 — 138 September 4, 2001 Page Two BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council has considered the proposed Negative Declaration No. IS-2001-1 together with any comments received during the public review process, and finds on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, approves the Negative Declaration, and authorizes the filing of a Notice of Determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Coastal Development Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This Coastal Development permit authorizes the development of a facility for the storage and distribution of a sand abrasive. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibit A-r, revision, Case File no. CDP-2001-1, dated 4/18/01. 2. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Plumbing, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations. 3. A drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer, or other qualified professional, and shall be in accordance with City requirements. 4. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements (approximately 10' of sidewalk and 15' of driveway) along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 5. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the National City Engineering Department. 6. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way. 7. During construction, Fire Department emergency access shall be maintained at all times and no Fire Department equipment or connections shall be obstructed. 8. A trash enclosure shall be provided in accordance with city standards. It shall have an exterior that matches the building. Resolution No. 2001 - 138 September 4, 2001 Page Three 9. Exterior walls of buildings/ freestanding signs/ trash enclosures to a height of not less than 6 feet shall be treated with "Graffiti Melt Coating" manufactured by Genesis Coatings, Inc. A similar product may be used, subject to approval from the Building and Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its observance. 10. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan, including plant types, methods of planting, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant planting and water conserving irrigation devices. 11. The property owner shall submit a letter to Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the Authority for any water facility improvements required for the proposed project. 12. Before this Coastal Development Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Coastal Development Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Coastal Development Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 13. Television cable companies shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to filling of cable trenches. 14. Best management practices shall be used during construction and operation to prevent water sedimentation and dust emissions. 15. Thirty percent (30%) of the lower 12 feet of the front wall of the building shall be surfaced with glass, stone, wood, brick or decorative masonry. 16. This Coastal Development Permit shall be valid for one (1) year from the date of final City action. 17. Proposed landscaping shall include planting of tree species determined in consultation with CDC, in lieu of the proposed Eucalyptus trees. Resolution No. 2001 - 138 September 4, 2001 Page Four 18. The applicant shall remove the north section of the existing chainlink fence if it is agreeable to the property owner. 19. Plans submitted for building permits shall include permanent restroom facilities, which shall be installed prior to occupancy of the structure. 20. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a $4,000 sewer lateral guarantee fee shall be paid to the City. 21. If a sewer line is not extended to the property within a period of one year from issuance of this permit, the project shall come back to the City Council for review. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution shall be transmitted forthwith to the applicant; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the resolution is adopted. The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure Section 1094.6. PASSED and ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2001. George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ETING DATE September 04, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #08 PREPARED BY C. Palazo EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Finance Ratification of Warrant Register#08 per Government Section Code 37208. Environmental Review (-Financial Statement Not applicable. N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $2,263,050.50. BOARD / COMMISSION/ RECOMMENDATION zeaau214, ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Warrant Register #08 2. Workers Comp Warrant Register dated 08/15/01 3. Payroll Warrant Register dated 08/15/01 Resolution No. A-200 (9:99) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 04, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #09 PREPARED BY C. Palazo EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Finance Ratification of Warrant Register #09 per Government Section Code 37208. CEnvironmental Review N/A Financial Statement Not applicable. Approved By Finance Dire Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend ratification of these war nts for a total of $1,626,233.17. BOARD / COMMISSION COMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Warrant Register #09 2. Workers Comp Warrant Register dated 08/22/01 Resolution No. A-200 (9i99) MEETING DATE ITEM TITLE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Sept. 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 CONSOLIDATED CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT AS OF MAY 31, 2001 PREPARED BY T. Limfueco EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Finance For the City Council's information and in compliance with the City's investment policy, the consolidated cash and investment report as of May 31, 2001 is hereby submitted. This report reflects the components of the investment portfolio as of May 31, 2001 and the results of the investmentprogram for the period then ended. The investment portfolio provides for sufficient liquidity to meet the following month's estimated expenditures. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement Not applicable. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approved By: Fin e Director Account No. We recommend that the report be accepted and filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Cash Account ummary. 2. Portfolio Summary. 3. Portfolio Details - Investments. 4. Activity Report — Sorted by Brokers A-200 i9: 991 5. Consolidated Cash Repor�luteon No. 6. Monthly Statement of Receipts. 7. Monthly Statement of Disbursements. 8. Pooled Investment Transactions Report. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CASH ACCOUNT SUMMARY 31-May-01 REVOLVING CASH RETURNED CHECKS BANK OF AMERICA #80200 OUTSTANDING WARRANTS PAYROLL OUTSTANDING WARRANTS CASH HELD BY BROKERS INVESTMENTS LAIF TOTAL INVESTMENT EARNINGS HISTORY: BALANCE 3,596.06 6,392.25 87,723.15 (311,959.65) (31,687.36) 106,180.34 19, 928, 780.95 17,209,950.09 $ 36,998,975.83 FISCAL YEAR YEAR-TO-DATE 2000-01 $ 1,619,960.84 $ 1999-00 1,187,500.13 1998-99 1,106,494.66 1997-98 829,832.42 1996-97 919,048.90 1995-96 966,890.40 1994-95 1,000,680.61 1993-94 765,275.62 1992-93 522,219.09 1991-92 680,256.39 1990-91 1,028, 752.35 1989-90 1,206,976.56 1988-89 968, 212.66 1987-88 798,394.91 1986-87 849,578.73 1985-86 1,124,977.27 0501 Combined Cash Reconciliation Worksheets TOTAL YEAR 1,841,539.16 1,702,889.57 1,478,232.91 1,256,907.31 974,113.25 1,001,709.56 1,011,586.52 721,913.49 864,052.63 1,303,878.52 1, 544, 993.71 1,311,930.94 979,435.87 1, 048, 978.23 1,321,688.93 �.ig VI I St- SymPro City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31, 2001 City of National City Investments Par Market Book % of Days to YTM/C YTM/C Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 8,506,000.00 8,506,000.00 8,506,000.00 42.68 510 276 6.159 244 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity 95,000.00 6.083 95,000.00 95,000.00 0.48 1,827 1,084 6.000 Negotiable/Transferable CDs 4,573,000.00 8.083 4,356,286.33 4,215,286.23 21.15 2,010 1,215 Federal Agency Securities 6,974,875.00 8.135 8.248 6,985,306.03 8,974,875.00 35.00 1,188 949 Pass Through Securities 133,464.48 5.681 5.760 737,916.32 137,619.72 0.69 1,369 441 7.882 7.991 Investments 20,282,339.48 20,080,508.68 ° 19,928,780.95 100.00% 1,076 715 6.421 6.510 Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 104,646.10 1,318,478.71 Average Daily Balance 20,001,871.89 Effective Rate of Return 6.16% 22,183,759.93 6° .48 /° Marylouli Mali ,Directory of Finance Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:47 3/4 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM1) SymRept V5.02f Certificates of Deposit - Monthly City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2001 Page 2 Average Purchase CUSIP Stated VTM/C Days to Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Maturity ty Date 10440 Admiralty Bank 12/21/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.950 6.950 19 06/20/2001 10183 Argo Federal Savings Bank 04/30/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.800 10445 American Investment Bank 5.600 333 04/30/2002 01/05/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.820 6.820 220 01/07/2002 10449 Anderson Brothers Bank 01/19/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.200 6.200 47 07/18/2001 16425 Asia Europe Americas Bank 10/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.120 7.120 1450/4/2001 10192 Associates National Bank 05/06/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.850 5.850 339 05/06/2002 10459 Astoria Federal Savings & Loan 02/05/2001 100,000.00 100,000.00 10410 Bank of Alamo 100,000.00 5.900 5.900 249 02/05/2002 09/08/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.300 7.300 101 09/10/2001 10426 Bank of Alice, The 10/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 10431 Bank of Kentucky,The 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 166 11 /14/2001 11/14/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 166 11/14/2001 10491 Bank of Nashville, The 03/30/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.240 5.240 3330/30/200 10428 Bank of Wilmington 10/30/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.110 7.110 0 151 10/30/2001 10519 BNC National Bank 05/10/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.120 5.120 710 05/12/2003 10398 Boundary Waters Community Bank 06/30/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 10446 Capital One Bank 01/09/2001 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.600 31 07/09/2002 10520 Colony Bank of Asbum 05/11/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 199,000.00 5.000 6.64000,000.00 6.640 403 05/13/200205/3/2002 10225 Corn Belt 8 & T Co 06/28/1999 6.200 327 21 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.200 6.200 27 08/28/2001 10503 Centennial Bank of the West 04/30/2001 - 99,000.00 10515 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.100 5.100 333 04/30/2002 Commerce Exchange Bank 04/24/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.050 5.050 327 04/24/2002 10452 Century Bank 01/24/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.050 6.050 237 01/24/2002 10505 Capitol Federal Savings Bank 04/17/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 10417 Citizens Bank 99,000.00 5.310 5.310 381 06/17/2002 09/29/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 119 09/28/2001 10524 Community National Bank 05/22/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 10447 Capital One FSB 01/09/2001 99,000.00 09,000.00 99,000.00 5.200 5.200 720 07/09/2002. 220872DT9 10174 Carus Bank 99,000.00 5.5.450 307/09/2002 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.4450 50 5.450 319 9 04/16/2002 8/2002 10422 Credit America Savings Co 10/18/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.150 7.150 139 10/16/2001 10407 Community Savings Bank 08/31/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.250 7.250 9 10438 Direct Merchants Bank 12/15/20002/15/2001 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 7.000 7.000 197 12l15/2001 10474 Eaton Federal Savings Bank 03/12/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 10437 Enterprise Bank 99,000.00 5.500 5.500 284 03/12/2002 12/05/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.050 7.050 187 12lOS/2001 10453 Farmers State Bank of Oakley 01/29/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 8.000 6.000 243 01/30/2002 10182 First Bank of Richmond SB 04/29/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 332 04/29/2002 10408 First Capital Bank of Kentucky 09/06/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.400 7.400 278 03/06/2002 10388 First Financial Bank 06/02/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.750 7.750 1 06/02/2001 10463 First Enterprise Bank, West Br 02/15/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 10420 First Western Bank 99,000.00 5.90015.9001623 02/14/200301 10/11/2000 - �99,OD0.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.150 7.150 38 07/09/2001 Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:47 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2001 Average Purchase Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Page 3 Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 10414 FNB of Bamesville 09/22/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.300 7.300 298 03/26/2002 10589 first Nag. Bk.of Damariscotta 05/30/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.100 5.171 728 05/30/2003 10179 FNB of Elk River 04/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 325 04/22/2002 10517 FNB Of St. Mary's 05/03/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.200 5.200 612 02/03/2003 1d430 First State Bank 10/20/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.070 7.070 140 10/19/2001 10513 First State Bank 04/25/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.200 5.200 328 04/25/2002 10513 First State Bank of Texas 04120/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.260 5.260 507 10f21/2002 10467 F S B of Donalsonville 02/23/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.700 5.700 269 02/25/2002 10432 First Security Bank & Trust 11/17/2000 99,000.00 _ 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 230 01/17/2002 10403 First State Bank - Wisconsin 08/17/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.400 7.400 76 08/16/2001 10401 Signal Bank S (Goodhue County) 07/24/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 53 07/24/2001 10402 Golden Security Thrift & Loan 07/28/2000 90,000.00 90,000.00 90,000.00 7.500 7.500 57 07/28/2001 10473 Guaranty National Bank 03/12/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.500 5.500 283 O3/11/2002 10444 Habersham Bank 01/03/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.870 6.870 216 01/03/2002 10412 Hometown Bank 09/19/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.350 7.350 40 07/11/2001 10436 IndyMac Bank FSB 11/29/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 181 11/29/2001 +.-- 1041542/117391 10178 Insouth Bank 04/21/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.600 5.600 325 04/22/2002 10521 International Bank of Chicago 05/14/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.250 5.250 712 05/14/2003 10488 Intrust Bank 03/22/2001 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.350 5.350 294 03/22/2002 Od 10490 Iowa State Bank 03/27/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.350 5.350 299 03/27/2002 10450 Iowa State Bank & Trust Co 01/19/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.250 6.250 235 01/22/2002 10523 Key Bank USA 05/21/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.250 5.250 903 11/21/2003 10489 Lewiston State Bank 03/24/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.300 5.300 298 03124/200 2 10433 Mercedes National Bank 11/27/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 179 11/27/2001 10223 Merrick Banking Corporation 06/22/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.000 6.000 20 06/21/2001 10204 Michigan Heritage Bank 05/13/1999 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.700 5.700 346 05/13/2002 10416 Mid -America Bank 09/29/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.200 7.200 122 10/01/2001 10415 Morris State Bank, The 09/27/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.200 7.200 118 09/27/2001 10518 Mesa Bank 05/09/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.000 5.000 342 05/09/2002 10477 North Central Bank for Savings 03/19/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.400 5.400 291 03/19/2002 10504 NCB Savings Bank FSB 04/30/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.050 5.050 304 04/01/2002 10462 Newberry Federal S & L 02/15/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.000 6.000 104 09/13/2001 10512 New South Federal Savings Bank 04/19/2001 - 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.050 5.050 322 04/19/2002 10499 Omni Bank (United National Bk) 04/05/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.150 5.150 308 04/05/2002 10224 Park Avenue Bank NA, The 06/24/1999 99,000.00 - 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.050 6.050 24 O6I2512001 10396 Peoples Bank of Kentucky 06/05/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 4 06/05/2001 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 08/29/2001 • 10:47 CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2001 Investment # Issuer Average Purchase Balance Date Certificates of Deposit - Monthly Par Value Page 4 Market Value Book Value Stated Rate Mood y 'sYTWc Days 365 Mat rity MatDtY Date ate 10429 Peoples Bank & Trust Co 11/07/2000 99,000.00 10525 Peoples State Bank 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 159 11/07/2001 05/25/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.300 5.300 907 11/25/2003 10177 Queens County Savings Bank 04/20/1999 99,000.00 10478 Republic National Bank 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.650 5.650 325 04/22/2002 03/22/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 1d522 Rushmore State Bank 05/15/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.450 5.450 661 03/24/200305/15/2002 10427 Small Town Bank 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.000 5.000 348 10/24/2000 99,000.00 99,090.00 99,000.00 7.100 7.100 146 10/25/2001 10590 SYLVAN STATE BANK 05/30/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.350 10193 E"Trade Bank (TeleBank) 05/06/1999 99,000.00 99,000.005.660 157 11/05/2001 10400 Traders Bank 99,000.00 5.880 5.660 57 /05/200 07/11/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.708 40 07/11/2001 10418 Triad Bank 09/29/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.200 10516 Union National Bank 05/02/2901 5.250 49 12/02/2002 10389 Universal Savings. Bank FSB 05/18/2000 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 5.250 5.250 549 08/16/2001 99,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.500 7.500 76 08/18/2001 10397 Western Security Bank 06/26/2000 99,000.00' 99,000.00 99,000.00 7.600 7.600 25 2/2/200 10442 Westland Savings Bank 12/21/2000 99,000.00 6 99,000.00 99,000.00 6.940 .940 56812/21/2002 Subtotal and Average 8,122,774.19 8,506,000,00 8,506,000.00 8,506,000.00 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity 6.244 276 066320ZF2 10234 Bankers Trust 05/20/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 6.083 1,084 05/20/2004 G Subtotal and Average 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 Negotiable/Transferable CDs 6.083 1,084 0279999X1 10358 American National B & TC 02/18/2000 100,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.760 15.799 1,351 ,*, 01/27/1999 06035ADT7 10072 Bank & Trust of Puerto Rico02/11/2005 0649999X5 10346 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.300 5.300 970 01/27/2004 Bank One, Colorado 01/25/2000 100,000.00 100,000.00 15640XBK6 10158 Centura National Bank95,000.00 6.760 15.79861,322 01/13/20059 03/09/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 6.000 203584AD9 10071 Community Bank of Ravenswood - 01/28/1999 95,000.005.350 1,9261 01/28/2004 258115AV8 10041 Dora! FSB 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.350 5.350 971 01/28/2004 12/10/1998 99,000.00 99,000.00 98,384.22 5.350 5.493 922 12/10/2003 29874FA32 10134 European American Bank 02/04/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,160 08/04/2004 10031 Farmers Bank 10/02/1998 100,000.00 75,948.98 30241 HXE3 10159 FCC National Bank 95,000.00 5.650 13.769 853110/02/20031 03/10/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.700 5.700 1,013 03/10/2004 33847EGE1 10205 Flagstar Bank 05/14/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 5.500 5.500 347 05/14/2002 32109VAH7 10203 FNB of Lucedale 05/12/1999 97,000.00 97,964.18 97,000.00 5.500 5.500 346 05/13/2002 10195 FNB of America 05/08/1999 95,000.00 95,000.00 356611 FU2080 10168 Fremont Investment & Loan95,000.00 5.500 5.500 3391 04/07/2004 04/07/1999 97,000.00 � 97,426.80 97,000.00 5.600 5.600 1,041 04/07/2004 10324 First Bank & Trust 04/28/1999 100,000.00 10325 First Union Bank 85,278.39 85,276.39 5.750 12.530 324 04/21/2002 02/23/1999 100,000.00 84,801.52 84,801.52 5.820 12.683 295 03/23/2002 Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:47 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF PM2) SymRept V5.02f CUSIP Investment# Negotiableffransferable CDs 39739BS36060 10162 10262 10037 441800AY8060 10167 44921CBN6 1d042 45383NAQ4 10160 47816HAB3 10161 51803KG35 10078 51803AVL0 10327 531554AG8 10166 509685AC7 10165 55258NKS2 10077 564759LT3 10152 55262WWR3060 10151 59020WDF5 10216 10329 10038 10034 10076 10133 10341 743836TD0 10043 82661YAG8 10339 82668FCS4 10137 798219AB7060 10146 10263 856284GL2060 10135 789369HG3 10075 8649999X9 10347 10281 90331 V9X2 10353 10332 685621CW2060 680061BK3 710198GA4 Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:47 Issuer Average Balance City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2001 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Page 5 Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Greenwood Trust Company DE Great South Texas Bank Hometown Bank NA Household Bank IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co Independent Bank W Michigan Johnson Bank Lasalle Bank NA Lasalle Bank NA Libertyville Bank & Trust Lake Forest Bank & Trust M & I Marshall & lisley Bank Manufacturers & Traders Trust MBNA America Merrill Lynch Bank USA Bank of Mount Vernon Nations Bank (Bamett Bank) Orchard Federal Savings Bank Old National Bank Peoples Bank Pony Express Bank Provident Bank Signal Bank N A Signet Bank San Jose National Bank South Bay Bank State Bank of India St Francis Bank FSB Success National Bank Upstate National Bank U S Bank NA Wilmington Trust Co Subtotal and Average 4,290,383.00 03/17/1999 09/15/1999 11/20/1998 04/07/1999 12/23/1998 03/15/1999 03/17/1999 01/25/1999 02/03/1999 04/06/1999 04/06/1999 01/27/1999 03/04/1999 03/03/1999 05/27/1999 02/26/1999 12/01/1998 11/04/1998 01/28/1999 02/10/1999 10/13/1999 01/21/1999 11/02/1998 03/01/1999 03/03/1999 07/26/1999 02/12/1999 01/29/1999 01/31/2000 10/05/1999 02/04/2000 03/08/1999 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 97,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 100,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 97,000.00 95,000.00 100,000.00 99,000.00 99,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 100,000.00 99,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 97,000.00 100,000.00 97,000.00 95,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,500.00 75,811.23 85,328.46 97,171.69 94,762.50 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 100,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 95,000.00 97,822.56 95,000.00 69,971.36 99,000.00 87,271.47 95,000.00 95,000.00 65,799.53 98,961.39 95,000.00 95,000.00 97,029.10 88,986.23 98,488.95 95,000.00 100,000.00 78,963.99 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.600 75,811.23 6.550 85,328.46 5.650 97,000.00 5.500 95,000.00 5.550 95,000.00 6.000 95,000.00 6.250 95,000.00 6.000 49,892.25 8.210 95,000.00 5.550 95,000.00 5.550 94,818.55 6.050 93,114.92 5.500 97,000.00 5.400 95,000.00 6.000 69,971.36 6.550 99,000.00 5.850 99,000.00 5.750 94,772.00 6.000 95,000.00 5.500 65,799.53 7.240 99,000.00 5.500 95,249.24 6.500 97,886.10 6.250 97,000.00 5.400 88,986.23 6.180 98,658.70 5.850 94,525.00 8.000 79,937.85 6.270 78,963.99 6.570 74,008.71 7.020 76,570.64 8.150 4,573,000.00 4,356,286.33 4,215,286.23 5.600 1,020 03/17/2004 15.190 1,153 07/28/2004 12.402 129 10/08/2001 5.500 1,041 04/07/2004 5.550 935 12123/2003 5.999 1,007 03/04/2004 6.250 2,846 03/17/2009 6.000 4,621 01/25/2014 24.665 3,616 04/26/2011 5.550 1,029 03/26/2004 5.550 1,029 03/26/2004 6.076 2,797 01/27/2009 5.847 1,729 02/24/2006 5.400 640 03/03/2003 6.000 1,096 06/01/2004 15.910 1,566 09/14/2005 5.850 793 08/03/2003 5.750 886 11/04/2003 6.032 2,798 01/28/2009 5.500 1,166 08/10/2004 21.020 1,297 12/19/2004 5.500 1,146 07/21/2004 6.432 803 08/13/2003 5.500 880 10/29/2003 5.400 1,006 03/03/2004 13.125 55 07/26/2001 5.405 760 07/01/2003 6.067 2,799 01/29/2009 14.114 974 01/31/2004 14.890 875 10/24/2003 16.505 1,343 02/03/2005 14.182 1,000 02/26/2004 8.248 1,215 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f 1 City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2001 Page 6 Days CUSIP Investment# Issuer Average Purchase Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value S Ra Moody's YT365 Maturi� Maturity tated Federal Agency Securities tY Date 31331LDS4 10481 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/19/2001 31331LDS4 10482 - 200,000.00 200,140.00 200,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,022 03/19/2004 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/19/2001 200,000.00 200,128.00 31331LDH8 10486 Federal Farm Credit Bank 100,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,022 09/15/2004 31331LEV6 03/15/2001 100,000.00 100,040.00 100,000.00 5.720 10498 Federal Farm Credit Bank 04/02/20015.220 1,2028 04/02/2004 31331LFJ2C 10e34100,000.00 99,670.00 100,000.00 5.220 5.220 1,036 04/02/2004 Federal Farm Credit Bank 04/12/2001 100,000.00 31331 LFTOC 100,034.70 10540 Federal Farm Credit Bank100,000.00 5.390 5.390 1,229 04/26/2004 31331LGU6 04/26/2001 100,000.00 100,350.30 100,000.00 5.490 10543 Federal Farm Credit Bank 05/15/2001 100,000.00 5.490 1,263 /5/2004 3133M6N79C 10057 Federal Home Loan Bank 99,760.00 100,000.00 5.500 5.500 1,283 11/15/2004 3133M6N79 10057 12/01/1998 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 5.930 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/01/1998 100,000.005.9305.910 913 12/01/2003 3133M8P04060 10119 Federal Home Loan Bank100,000.001100,000.00 5.910 79136 12/01/2003 3133M8PX0060 10128 12/04/1998 100,000.00 100,031.00 100,000.00 5.875 5.875 918 12/04/2003 Federal Home Loan Bank 12/02/1998 125,000.00 125,000.00 3133M8V92C 10228 Federal Home Loan Bank125,000.00 5.795 5.795 914 12/02/2003 3133M8ZP2C 10230 06/09/1999 100,000.00 100,041.10 100,000.00 6.000 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/24/1999 100,000.00 100,134,00 100,000.00 6.250 6.000 388 06/24/2002 3133M94LC3 10240 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/17/1999 6.2501199 12/17/2001 3133M94L3 10242 100,000.00 100,081.70 100,000.00 6.140 6.140 199 12/17/2001 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/17/1999 100,000.00 100,090.00 3133M9A85 10266 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,000.00 6.200.140 6.140 199 12/17/2001 3133M9D90 07/09/1999 100,000.00 100,250.00 100,000.00 10271 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/19/1999 100,000.006.200 403 07/09/200207/19/2001 3133M9NW8 10279 100,233.3011100,000.00 6.040 6.040 48 �Federal Home Loan Bank 08/25/1999 100,000.00 101,812.00 _g 3133M9A85 10280 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,000.00 6.200 6.540 403 02/25/2002 t\ 3133M9NW6 10285 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/10/1999 100,000.00 100,270.00 100,000.00 6.200 6.200 403 07/09/20022 � 3133M9J45 08/2511999 100,000.00 101,860.00 100,000.00 8.540 6.540 289 02/25/2002 10360 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/18/1999 3133MBL54 10390 100,000.00 100,490.00 100,000.00 8.060 6.060 76 08/16/2001 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/06/2000 100,000.00 103,161.00 3133MBXF9C 10405 Federal Home Loan Bank 08/22/2000 100,000.00 7.500 7.500 370 08/21/2002 100,000.00 100,627.60 100,000.00 7.030 7.030 446 08/2/2002 3133MDDR1 10469 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/01/2001 150,000.00 150,000.00 3133MDEJ8C 10476 Federal Home Loan Bank 150,000.00 6.000 6.000 1,188 09/01/200414 3133MDF7C 03/14/2001 100,000.00 100,067.20 100,000.00 6.050 10479 Federal Home Loan Bank. 03/15/2001 100,000.00 5.740 1,018 03/15/2004 3133MDF57 10480 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,090.00 100,000.00 5.740 5.740 1,018 03/15/2004 03/15/2001 100,000.00 100,090.00 100,000.00 5.740 5.740 1,018 03/15/2004 3133MDJ61C 10485 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/22/2001 100,000.00 100,082.70 3133M0J61 10487 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,025 03/22/2004 3133MDLR2 03/22/2001 200,000.00 200,200.00 200,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,025 03/22/2004 10492 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/26/2001 200,000.00 3133MDS53 10493 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,120.50 100,000.00 5.520 5.520 1,216 09/29/2004 3133M0UE7 10495 03/29/2001 100,000.00 100,120.50 100,000.00 5.680 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/29/2001 100,000.005.680 1,216 09/29/2004 3133M0T45 10496 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,130.00 100,000.00 5.585 5.585 1,216 09/29/2004 3133MDR39 10497 03/29/2001 100,000.00 100,140.00 100,000.00 5.625 Federal Home Loan Bank 03/29/2001 100,000.005.62511,032 03/29/2004. 3133M0Y31 10501 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,140.00 100,000.00 5.210 5.210 1,032 03/29/2004 3133M0W33 10502 04/05/2001 t00,000.00 99,640.00 100,000.00 5.210 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/06/2001 200,000.00 5.210 1,039220/06/2004 199,780.00 200,000.00 5.550 5.550 1,223 10/06/2004 Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:47 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f CUSIP Average Investment # Issuer Balance Federal Agency Securities 3133ME5B3 10530 3133MDZ71 10531 3133MDZN6 10532 3133ME2T7C 10537 3133MECT6C 10538 3133MEF97C 10539 3133MECD1 10541 3133MECT6 10542 3133MEYN5 10558 3133MEXR7 10559 3133MEQH7C 10560 3133MEW72C 10561 3133MEZ20C 10562 3133TGSG5 10301 312923LAIC 10470 312923LA1 10471 312923LA1 10472 D 312923PB5 10483 312923PB5C 10484 312923SD8 10494 312923SX4 10533 31364G4L-0 10277 313641(858 10441 31364K2M1 10466 86387R2P6 10278 Pass Through Securities 31341SZX2060 10094 31341RVL4060 10095 31341RDX8010 10096 313401WX5060 10099 31341UZL3060 10406 313610E06060 10092 31361SN51 10098 31381T4J0060 10102 Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. Sallie Mae Agency Bond City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31,2001 Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Page 7 Stated YTM/C Days to Maturity Book Value Rate Moody's 365 Maturity Date Subtotal and Average 7,347,504;43 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 04/12/2001 04/12/2001 04/12/2001 04/18/2001 04/25/2001 04/25/2001 04/25/2001 04/25/2001 05/24/2001 05/24/2001 05/17/2001 05/24/2001 05/24/2001 12/01/1998 03/08/2001 03/08/2001 03/08/2001 03/21/2001 03/21/2001 03/29/2001 04/12/2001 08/05/1999 12/20/2000 02/23/2001 08/24/1999 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 08/22/2000 12/23/1997 02/18/1998 02/18/1998 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 99,875.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 200,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 6,974,875.00 1,536.57 1,804.95 1,354.28 1,043.54 28,280.50 771.77 1,347.88 0.00 99,820.00 99,630.00 99,590.00 100,174.50 100,028.60 99,849.03 99,980.00 99,770.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,280.50 100,172.50 100,101.80 99,408.00 100,031.30 100,115.00 100,160.00 100,070.00 200,310.60 200,161.80 199,380.00 100,243.00 100,180.00 100,380.00 100,562.00 6,985,306.03 1,539.34 1,811.65 1,356.72 1,080.19 29,147.69 804.42 1,404.90 0.00 100,000.00 5.520 100,000.00 5.210 100,000.00 5.400 100,000.00 5.490 100,000.00 5.500 99,875.00 6.485 100,000.00 5.470 100,000.00 5.500 100,000.00 5.250 100,000.00 5.300 100,000.00 5.500 100,000.00 5.460 100,000.00 5.340 100,000.00 6.000 100,000.00 s 5.750 100,000.00 5.750 100,000.00 5.750 100,000.00 5.665 200,000.00 5.665 200,000.00 5.500 200,000.00 5.450 100,000.00 6.170 100,000.00 6.500 100,000.00 6.000 100,000.00 6.300 6,974,875.00 1,596.13 9.000 1,874.93 9.000 1,408.52 9.000 1,077.48 8.500 28,280.95 8.000 797.35 8.500 1,398.43 8.500 0.00 8.500 5.520 1,229 10/12/2004 5.210 1,046 04/12/2004 5.400 1,230 10/13/2004 5.490 1,235 10/18/2004 5.500 1,242 10/25/2004 5.485 1,424 04/25/2005 5.470 1,242 10/25/2004 5.500 1,242 10/25/2004 5.250 1,272 11/24/2004 5.300 1,272 11/24/2004 5.500 1,265 11/17/2004 5.460 1,453 05/24/2005 5.340 1,272 11/24/2004 8.083 791 08/01/2003 5.750 1,011 03/08/2004 5.750 1,011 03/08/2004 5.750 1,011 03/08/2004 5.685 1,208 09/21/2004 5.665 1,208 09/21/2004 5.500 1,032 03/29/2004 5.450 1,229 10/12/2004 6.170 67 08/07/2001 6.500 567 12/20/2002 6.000 1,179 08/23/2004 6.300 84 08/24/2001 5.760 949 7.495 7.514 7.412 7.359 12.477 7.494 7.107 6.967 153 11/01/2001 122 10/01/2001 92 09/01/2001 214 01/01/2002 273 03/01/2002 304 04/01/2002 214 01/01/2002 0 02/01/2002 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 06/29/2001 -10:47 CUSIP City of National City Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2001 Investment/F Issuer Average Purchase Balance Date Pass Through Securities Par Value Page 8 Market Value Book Value StaRa a Moody'sMaturity D�365 Days ty Mat Date ate 31364TKP5060 10103 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 02/18/1998 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.500 31378PGY5 10126 Federal Natl. Mortg age Assoc. 12/01/1998 45,479.14 47,108.68 47,398.63 8.500 36216XMV0020 - 10079 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 08/28/1997 36217EBM3020 10080 466.26 678.10- 673.23 8.500 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 08/26/1997 466.26 487.11 36202AXN2020 10083 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/15/1997483.62 8.500 36202AX77020 10084 1,315.544,04.46 3,050.62 8.500 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/21/1997 2,940.35 3,042.46 36217LQQ2020 10085 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/30/1997 4,965.45 8.500 36218TKS8020 10086 1,217.01 1,271.53 ,262.74 8.500 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/30/1997 1,217.09 1,271.53 36218VD59020 10087 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/12/1997 1,262.74 8.500 36217AUE8020 10088 1,313.53 5,598.81 5,541.30,54.30 8.500 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/12/1997 5,363.53 5,598.81 38202AYQ4020 10090 GovL National Mortgage Assoc. 11/21/19975,447.91 8.000 36202A5C7020 10091 5,276.36 4,723.22 4 8.000 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 11/25/1997 4,584.70 4,723.22 36216NJL8020 10105 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 1,579.18 8.500 36202A2B2020 10106 1,0' 4,094.81.4,204.31 ,202.7 9.000 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 4,204.38 3621614N8020 10107 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 03/17/1998 4,202.37 9.000 362161075020 10108 1,936.42 1,950.02 2,097.86 9.000 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc, 03/26/1998 1,936.42 1,950.02 36217LVM5020 10109 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 2,013.91 9.000 t 36218NZQ7020 10110 3,683.82 5,291.1645,233.56 8.000 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 3,683.82 3,845.42 k36202AZU4020 10111 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 04/16/1998 3,812.7818.000 36202AW52020 102361,283.48 1,328.05 1,331.65 8.500 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 10/21/1997 1,283.48 1,328.05 1,331.65 8.500 Subtotal and Average 146,210.26 133,464.48 137,916.32 137,619.72 Total Investments and Average 20,001,871.89 20,282,339.48 20,080,508.68 19,928,780.95 Run Date: 08/292001 -10:47 7.307 0 11/01/2004 6.626 760 07/01/2003 6.671 136 10/15/2001 6.727 197 12/15/2001 7.361 202 12/20/2001 7.495 233 01/20/2002 6.657 228 01/15/2002 7.329 75 08/15/2001 6.685 471 09/15/2002 6.424 287 03/15/2002 7.239 264 02/20/2002 7.000 476 09/20/2002 7.549 167 11/15/2001 6.957 353 05/20/2002 7.483 167 11/15/2001 7.150 197 12/15/2001 6.352 287 03/15/2002 6.344 409 07/15/2002 7.513 323 04/20/2002 6.624 172 11/20/2001 7.991 441 6.510 715 Portfolio CNC CC PM (PRF_PM2) SymRept V5.02/ 14- SymPro Percent CUSIP Investment # Issuer of Portfolio City of Nati Activity Sorted By May 1, 2001 - Par Value onal City Report Brokers May 31, 2001 Beginning Current Transaction Balance Rate Date City of National City Par Value Purchases Sales/Calls/Maturities or Deposits or Withdrawals Ending Balance Brokers: Finance 500 Inc Certificates of Deposit - Monthly Subtotal and Balance 185,000.00 185,000.00 Certificates of Deposit - Maturity Subtotal and Balance Negotiable/Transferable CDs 95,000.00 95,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 3,693,000.00 3,693,000.00 Federal Agency Securities 3133M6GQ5 3133M8UA0 3134A2Z04 312923GV1 10063 10210 10411 10468 Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp Subtotal and Balance 885,000.00 5.785 05/17/2001 5.685 05/24/2001 5.580 05/23/2001 6.000 05/22/2001 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 85,000.00 200,000.00 485,000.00 400,000.00 Pass Through Securities Subtotal and Balance Brokers Subtotal 21.786% 45,479.14 4,903,479.14 Brokers: Gilford Securities Inc 0.00 485,000.00 45,479.14 4,418,479.14 Federal Agency Securities 3133M8N83C EC3079372 3133MD5H2 3133MEQH7C 3133MEW72C 3133MEZ20C 10202 10434 10465 10580 10561 10562 Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Subtotal and Balance 2,399,875.00 5.740 05/12/2001 7.000 05/17/2001 5.550 05/23/2001 5.500 05/17/2001 5.480 05/24/2001 5.340 05/24/2001 0.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 300,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 300,000.00 2,399,875.00 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.021 Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:50 CUSIP City of Nauvnal City Activity Report May 1, 2001 - May 31, 2001 Par Value Percent Par Value Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Sales/Calls/Maturities Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Brokers Subtotal 11.832% 2,399,875.00 Brokers: Multi -Bank Securities Inc Certificates of Deposit - Monthly 300,000.00 Ending Balance 300,000.00 2,399,875.00 Page 2 10519 BNC National Bank 10590 SYLVAN STATE BANK Subtotal and Balance 892,000.00 Negotiable/Transferable CDs 5.120 05/10/2001 • 5.350 05/30/2001 99,000.00 0.00 99,000.00 0.00 198,000.00 0.00 1,090,000.00 64880TGC5060 10136 New South Federal Savings Bank 5.300 05/25/2001 0.00 97,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 977,000.00 Federal Agency Securities 3133M6J33060 10239 Federal Home Loan Bank Subtotal and Balance 340,000.00 Pass Through Securities 5.730 05/24/2001 0.00 97,000.00 880,000.00 0.00 115,000.00 0.00 115,000.00 225,000.00 36216XMV0020 10079 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 05/16/2001 0.00 158.34 36217EBM3020 10080 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 05/16/2001 36202AXN2020 10083 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc.0.00 278.22 36202AX77020 10084 Govt.8.500 05/21/2001 0.00 7.96 National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 05/21/2001 36217LQQ2020 10085 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc.0.00 459.96671.10 362167KS8020 10086 8.500 05/15/2001 0.00 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 05/15/2001 38218VD59020 10087 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 0.00 399.80 36217AUE8020 100888.000 05/16/2001 0.00 97.82 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 05/16/2001 36202AYQ4020 10090 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc.0.00 671.93 36202A5C7020 10091 8.000 05/21/2001 0.00 01.47 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 05/21/2001 313610EQ6060 10092 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc.0.00 1,21.10 313610E06080 100928.500 05/25/2001 0.00 242.93 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 05/25/2001 31341SZX2060 10094 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage .00 40.4 31341RVL4060 10096 Corprp 9.000 05/15/2001 0.00 403.64 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 9.000 05/15/2001 31341RDX8010 10096 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Co 0.00 485.80 31361SN51 10098 9.000 05H5/2001 0.00 148,80 Federal Natl. Mortgage Assoc. 8.500 05/25/2001 31361SN51 10098 Federal Nat.Mortgage Assoc. 0.00 206.32 5/2001 313401WX5060 10099 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 8.500 05/1105/5/2001 0.00 234.10 36215N3C6020 10104 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc.0.00 164.9 36216NJL8020 10105 9.000 05/15/2001 0.00 98.4Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 05/16/2001 0.00 498.41 Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:50 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.02r CUSIP City of National City Activity Report May 1, 2001 - May 31, 2001 Par Value g din Percent Beginning Current Transaction Purchases Sales/Calls/Maturities Ending ng Bal Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Rate Date or Deposits or Withdrawals Brokers: Multi -Bank Securities Inc Par Value Page 3 Pass Through Securities 0.00 382.22 36202A2B2020 10106 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 7.500 05/21/2001 9.000 05/16/2001 0.00 379.80 3621614N8020 10107 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 9.000 05l16/2001 0.00 388.51 362161DT5020 10108 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 8.000 05/16/2001 0.00 2,3. 95 36217LVM5020 10109 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 0.00 ,08.95 36218N207020 E. 8.000 05/16/2001 10110 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. g 000 05//2001 0.00 679.99 36202AZU4020 10111 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 05/21/2001 0.00 287.97 36202AW52020 10236 Govt. National Mortgage Assoc. 0.00 2,778.21 31341 UZL3060 10406 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 8.000 05/15/20018.500 0.00 12,778.297,884.24 Subtotal and Balance 103,707.01 198,000.00 227,722.77 2,282,984.24 Brokers Subtotal 11.256% 2012,707.01 Brokers: Mischler Financial Group Inc Federal Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 500,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 2.465% 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 0.00 500,000.00 Ri Brokers: Morgan Keegan Federal.Agency Securities Subtotal and Balance 200,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 0.986% 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 0.00 200,000.00 Brokers: PaineWebber Inc Federal Agency Securities 3133M6K980.00 100,000.00 10069 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.640 05/25/2001 312902XD902XD8 10391 Federal Home Loan Mrtgage Corp 7.150 05/17/2001 0.00 100,000.000.00 200,000.00. 100,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 300,000.00 0.00 - 200,000.00 100,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 0.493% 300,000.00 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.02f Run Date: 08/29/2001 - 10:50 Brokers: U.S. Sterling Capital Corp. City of Natn...af City Activity Report May 1, 2001 - May 31, 2001 Par Value Percent Beginning Current Transaction Par Value CUSIP Investment # Issuer of Portfolio Balance Purchases Sates/Calls/Maturltiea Rate Date Ending or Deposits or Withdrawals Balance Certificates of Deposit - Monthly Page 4 10196 Winton Savings & Loan 5.600 05/07/2001 10201 Ashburn Bank 0.00 99,000.00 10209 5.600 05/11/2001 0.00 99,000.00 FNB of Jackson 5.800 05/21/2001 10381 Tumbeny Bank 0.099,000.00 7.250 05l03/2001 i. 0.000 99,000.00 10384 Cowlitz Bank 7.250 05/08/2001 10385 Heritage Bank of Commerce 0.00 99,000.00 10386 7.350. 05/11/2001 Rushmore State Bank 0.00 99,000.00 7.400 05/15/2001 10516 Union National Bank 0.00 99,000.00 10517 5.250 05/02/2001 99 000 FNB Of St. Mary's 5.200 05/03/2001 .00 0.00 10518 Mesa Bank 99,000.00 10520 Colony Bank of Asbum 5.000 05/09/2001 0.00 99,000.00 0.00 10521 5.000 05/11/2001 99,000.00 International Bank of Chicago 5.250 05/14/2001 0.00 10522 Rushmore State Bank 99,000.00 0.00 10523 5.000 05/15/2001 99,000.00 Key Bank USA 5 250 05/21/2001 0.00 10524 Community National Bank-99,000.00 0.00 10525 5.200 05/22/2001 99,000.00 Peoples State Bank 5.300 05/25/2001 0.00 10589 fIrst Natl. Bk.of Damadscotta 99,000,00 0.00 5.100 05/30/2001 99,000.00 0.00 a Subtotal and Balance 6,934,000.00 990,000.00 693,000.00 7,231,000.00 Brokers: Vining -Sparks IBG Federal Agency Securities Brokers Subtotal 35.652% 6,934,000.00 990,000.00 699,000.00 7,231,000.00 31331LGU6 10543 Federal Farm Credit Bank 3133MEYN5 10558 5.500 05/16/2001 100,000.00 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.250 05/24/2001 0.00 3133MEXR7 10559 Federal Home Loan Bank 100,000.00 0.00 5.300 05/24/2001 100,000.00 0.00 3133M7F50 10464 Federal Home Loan Bank 5.765 05/10/2001 0.00 250,000.00 Subtotal and Balance 3,100,000.00 Brokers Subtotal 15.531% 3,100,000.00 Run Date: 08/29/2001 •10:50 Total 100.000% 20,650,061.15 300,000.00 300,000.00 1,788,000.00 250,000.00 3,150,000.00 250,000.00 3,150,000.00 2,155,722.77 20,282,338.38 Portfolio CNC CC DA (PRF_DA) SymRept V5.02f CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CONSOLIDATED CASH REPORT ALL FUNDS MAY 31, 2001 FUND ENDING NUMBER FUND TITLE BALANCE 8,839,670.13 001 GENERAL FUND 261,511.68 103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 511.68 106 GRANT -CA LITERACY CAMPAIGN 876.09 107 RETIREMENT FUND 125,489.16 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,125,018.16 92 109 GAS TAXES FUND 57,764.16 110 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FUND 40,000.00 00 113 CULTURAL ARTS FUND 75,000. 0 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 3497 954 24 5 120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 97,954.24 123 GRANT -FAMILIES FOR LITERACY 2995442 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND12,080,248.23 126 ARE DEPT ACTIVITIES FUND 188, 248.11.1 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 188,165.12 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 2219131 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 16,988.22 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 13,215.07 145 JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND 3,985.15 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 138,703.34,. 157 GRANT-SUPPL. LAW ENF. (SLESF) 292581 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 28,740.00 159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE 143,207.58 169 GRANT -LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK 1,294.28371,050.20 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 77,494.50 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 8,.0 176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME 22.36 178 POLICE HAT BADGES '614.65 628 179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND 183 LITERACY INITIATIVES VI 1,991.6892,.61 189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 201 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1303 271,188.59,8.5 191 GRANT - STOP PROJECT 138441,3 5.51 5 195 LANDSCAPE RESERVE 4412161 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 633,601.88,0. 197 PRODUCTIVITY IMPROVEMENT RESER 5011,000.00 198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE 11,730.00 79 199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY.SVCS GRANT 634,043.09 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1304 9 203 PARK SECURITY/GTE LEASE28,000.00 205 YOUTH SERVICES MATERIALS GRANT 0.57 208 FY99-00 SUPP. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) 950.110. 209 FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII 12,068.16 60 210 FY99-00 F.U.L.)y.I.L.L. 12,068.16 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 177,099.90 212 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND 0,000.00 214 EVERY 15 MINUTES GRANT FY1999-2000 102,833. 5 219 FY00-01 LITERACY INITIATIVE IX 217,368.32 220 LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK GRANT FY2000-2001 8391946 225 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LITERACY INCENTIVE ELLI118,597.031,5. 227 CLLS MATCHING FUNDS FY 2000-2001 4 228 GROWING WITH MOTHER GOOSE GRANT 21,300.33 229 CLEEP GRANT 270 NUISANCE ABATEMENT FUND 119,151.00 303 CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND 2,633.38 304 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 299,571.00 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 94,098.25 308 GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB 2,177,307.33 312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY 109,754.61 474,197.08 315 FY98 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT (LLEBG) 343 STATE -LOCAL PARTNERSHIP 33,189.00 363 SECURITY & FIRE ALARM REGULATION FUND 3,172.45 35 552 TDA ,97.50 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 115,470.61 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 7,784.583,79,716.5 9 630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 1,031,334.05 633 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE RESERVE 80,329.68 70,000.00 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 719 1911 ACT IMPROVEMENT BONDS 37,871.03 721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 1,424.52 52,483.51 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 36,998,975.83 MONTHLY STATEMENT OF RECEIPTS FOR PERIOD ENDING MAY FUND # 2,786,618.15 23,838,663.96 001 GENERAL FUND 0.00 46,363.94 103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 44 160.00 49 104 LIBRARY FUND 41417,875.14486,930.77 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 51,469.041,68 08 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 77,363.381173,221.36 109 GAS TAXES FUND 6 368 8 641,168.004,68.00 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 0.001196 112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND 375.00 33,672.6122,501.00 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 78,591.23 0.00 78, 120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 8,336.4659.23 307,645.32 4,467,397.0 123 GRANT -FAMILIES FOR LITERACY 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND12,760.51 0.00 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 4,048.84 18,284.77 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND0.00 57,076.74 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 0.00 5,244.20 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 4.20 147 GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM 18,621.00.00 92,309.0065,21 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 900.00027,284.500 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 189 `GRANT -LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK 00 0 -4.4 17100LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 23,021.15126,899.70 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND0.00116,8 17,055.15 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 10,606.48 17,711.70 .00 176 POLICE REIMBURSED OVERTIME0.00 36.28 178 POLICE HAT BADGES ,136.28 0.00 185 COPS MORE 97-CM-WX-0949 0.00 11111,20.00 1213 00 188 GRANT - HIDTA 1,3.87 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND -1303 224,351.1024,35.0 191 GRANT - STOP PROJECT 1,970.48 12,822.57 192 LEASE ESCROW FUND 0.00 2 193 COPS GRANT PART III 16,0.00 6,250.0025.00 2,700.35 199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 3,55.00 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND -13040.00 734,544.76 201 NCJPFA DEBT SERVICE FUND6.52 204 GALE GRANT 0.00 0.00 17,9556.60 208 FY99-00 SUPP. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) 0.00 108,427.00 209 FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII 0.00 08,427.00 210 FY99-00 F.U.L.F.I.L.L. 5,280.00 59,450.00 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 0.00 2,833.95 214 EVERY 15 MINUTES GRANT FY1999-2000 0.00 35,998.67 218 HIHG INTENSITY PREVENTION ZONE 35,98098.67 0.00 4 219 FY00-01 LITERACY INITIATIVE IX 0.00 80,4.00 220 LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK GRANT FY2000-2001 0 00 38,411.00 223 FACE TO FACE INFORMATION GRANT FY 00-01 0.00 330,000.00 225 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LITERACY INCENTIVE ELL! 0.00 25,648.00 227 CLLS MATCHING FUNDS FY 2000-2001 5,648.00 0 00 228 GROWING WITH MOTHER GOOSE GRANT 0.00 128,01.00 229 CLEEP GRANT 0.00 9,15.00 270 NUISANCE ABATEMENT FUND 22,633.38 301 REROOF LOW SEC CAMACHO REC 7 g34 0.008 8,867. 6 302 CDC PAYMENTS 4.18 817,323.52-8,940.5 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 03.52 308 GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB 0.00 32,0.00 7,3822.49 312 STP LOCAUTRANSNET HIGHWAY 0.00 39,476.30 313 GRANT-CMAQ 0.00 39,476.30 314 OTS GRANT 0 00 851.7 8 343 STATE-LOCAL}SARTNERSHIP 0.00 159,103.9 347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT 220,626.94 1,954,168.441 5525.00 LIABILITY 76,054.19 833,208.49 627 INS. FUND 0.00 10,639.00 B29 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 0 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 0.00 0.00 639.0563.0-179.3 721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND 3,679,171.63 37,720,640.38 MAY REVENUE YTD REVENUE FUND TITLE TOTAL FUND NO. MONTHLY STATEMENT OF DISBURSEMENTS FOR THE MONTH ENDING MAY FUND TITLE 001 GENERAL FUND 103 GENERAL CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 104 LIBRARY FUND 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 109 GAS TAXES FUND 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 112 LOWER SWEETWATER FUND 115 PARK 8 REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 123 GRANT -FAMILIES FOR LITERACY 725 SEWER SERVICE FUND 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 145 JUVENILE EDUCATION FUND 147 GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 157 GRANT-SUPPL. LAW ENF. (SLESF) 159 GENERAL PLAN UPDATE RESERVE 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 772 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 179 NPT BUS DONATIONS FUND 182 COPS GRANT PART II 185 COPS MORE 97-CM-WX-0949 188 GRANT -HIDTA 189 CIVIC CENTER REFURBISHING 190 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND - 1303 191 GRANT- STOP PROJECT 192 LEASE ESCROW FUND 193 COPS GRANT PART III 195 LANDSCAPE RESERVE 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 198 PROPERTY EVIDENCE SEIZURE 199 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SVCS GRANT 200 30TH STREET CLEANUP FUND -1304 201 NCJPFA DEBT SERVICE FUND 204 GALE GRANT 207 CLLS MATCHING FUNDS FY99-00 208 FY99-00 SUPP. LAW ENFORCEMENT (SLESF) 209 FY99-00 LITERACY INITIATIVES VIII 210 FY99-00 F.U.L.F.I.L.L. 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 213 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT 99-00 218 HIHG INTENSITY PREVENTION ZONE 219 FY00-01 UTERACY INITIATIVE IX 220 LOCAL LAW ENF. BLOCK GRANT FY2000-2001 222 WOW MOBILE GRANT FY 2000-2001 223 FACE TO FACE INFORMATION GRANT FY 00-01 225 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LITERACY INCENTIVE ELLI 227 CLLS MATCHING FUNDS FY 2000-2001 228 GROWING WITH MOTHER GOOSE GRANT 230 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT GRANT 301 REROOF LOW SEC CAMACHO REC 302 CDC PAYMENTS 304 PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 308 GRANT -HIGHWAY BRIDGE REHAB 313 GRANT-CMAQ 314 OTS GRANT 347 PUBLIC RESOURCES ACCOUNT 348 STATE GRANT 552 TDA 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 627 LIABILITY INS.4FUND 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 832 INFORMATION SERVICES 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 721 LIBRARY TRUST FUND MAY YTD.MAY 1,355,334.92 14,577,857.44 0.00 3,000.00 68,676.21 645,441.94 44,080.43 499,678.92 20,988.57 30,959.49 136.00 67,611.15 9,477.84 106,534.80 5,133.90 64,313.97 0.00 (97.16) 7,381.76 11,617.86 2,853.56 27,647.99 87,390.80 4,133,313.22 945.74 2,692.22 12,109.23 40,769.74 0.00 18,985.20 189.55 2,474.70 3,226.34 4,892.29 2,897.94 58,416.16 8,067.02 60,398.72 0.00 82,908.25 0.00 612.54 16,529.30 76,476.59 1,369.67 38,528.74 1,735.39 20,291.43 8,327.25 70,847.31 0.00 200.00 7,561.36 92,572.38 0.00 52,158.00 5,412.37 64,501.50 2,790.65 10,273.87 0.00 272,089.09 7,938.54 111,789.04 1,970.48 275,887.87 1,841.66 32,306.88 3,920.42 49,057.56 2,932.60 75,698.14 0.00 3,892.93 18,706.00 179,516.00 0.00 26,283.34 0.00 737,403.53 0.00 350.00 0.00 77.00 0.00 89,352.66 0.00 93,73627 0.00 46,881.84 2,473.96 29,888.03 54,491.64 54,491.64 7,672.98 136,203.83 137,511.86 263,111.68 54,491.54 54,491.54 18,852.87 156,637.98 3,821.99 43,387.95 32,365.43 211,402.97 4,048.23 13,087.73 0.00 47,405.67 3,363.57 3,383.57 71,046.96 1,727,253.93 31,707.66 407,213.47 0.00 5,901.75 7,646.20 166,848.79. 0.00 49.14 53,742.00 240,575.42 3,024.50 3,024.50 0.00 15,981.38 33,281.12 243,564.83 185,606.86 1,924,660.27 106,927.57 1,376,649.74 220,889.15 949,908.66 36,543.62 183,525.81 10,090.42 198,656.23 26,547.26 449,126.41 19,260.23 120,258.64 29,646.23 377,098.23 69,336.64 713,878.66 75.25 75.25 TOTAL 2,932,391.24 32,957,925.11 City of National City Pooled Investment Transactions Report For the Month of May 2001 Date Description Institution Ref. No. Amount Beginning Balance 16,409,950.09 LAIF 286773 600,000.00 5/3 Deposit LAIF 639084 1,000,000.00 5/25 5 Withdrawal 5/Deposit LAIF 340985 (800,000.00) Ending Balance 17,209,950.09 0501 Combined Cash Reconciliation Worksheets Page 1 01 tr 8/29/01 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 11 AGENDA ITEM NO. (-ITEM TITLE PREPARED BY EXPLANATION The claim of Cecilia S. McKimmy arises from an occurrence on July 24, 2001 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on July 25, 2001 . CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Cecilia S. McKimmy Michael R. Dalla, CMG.APARTMENT City Clerk Environmental Review XX_ N/A Financial Statement N/A >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Account No. Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 (-ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Reuben Cavada PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CMCDERARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Reuben Cavada arises from an occurrence on January 29, 2001 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on July 27, 2001 . (-Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOA D / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: John Williams PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CM`DE ARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of John Williams arises from an occurrence on April 27, 2001 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on July 26, 2001 . Environmental Review XX N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 / ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Juan Pittayrizzont PREPARED BY Michael R. Dalla, CMC_IARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Juan Pittayrizzont arises from an occurrence on July 12, 2001 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on July 17, 2001 . (-Environmental Review XX N/A Financial Statement N/A >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A A-200 (9/80) Account No. Resolution No. City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OPPOSING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REGIONAL GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY COMMISSION (RGEC) PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Tom G. McCabe DEPARTMENT City Manager The Mayor asked that a resolution in opposition to the recommendations of the Regional Government Efficiency Commission (RGEC) be placed on the agenda for consideration. Environmental Review XN/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECO ENDATION Adopt Resolution BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION TT CHMENTS (Listed Below/ 1. Resolution Resolution No. 2001-139 A-200 (Rev. 9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2001 - '.139 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY OPPOSING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE REGIONAL GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY COMMISSION WHEREAS, the City Council of National City has reviewed the work and recommendations of the Regional Government Efficiency Commission ("RGEC"); and WHEREAS, the concept of RGEC directly conflicts with California's longstanding tradition of local control; and WHEREAS, the RGEC plan creates a new level of regional government founded upon a questionable premise, with an independent board, bureaucracy and attendant costs; end WHEREAS, the RGEC recommendation fails to address the most significant problem confronting regional planning and infrastructure, which is the lack of funding for transportation infrastructure and operations; and WHEREAS, a new layer of government will not solve the problems of infrastructure funding, construction, and operation; and WHEREAS, the existing system of regional government has adopted comprehensive, far-sighted and equitable plans for transportation which will meet the region's needs well into the future; and WHEREAS, SANDAG and the region's transit districts are effectively building the projects identified in those plans, within the constraints of existing funding; and WHEREAS, a new layer of government proposed by RGEC would neither eliminate parochialism nor provide a more effective process for the development of regional plans that incorporate and balance all local interests. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City as follows: 1. That the Legislature reject all RGEC plans and recommendations. 2. That, should the Legislature seek to impose regional governance on San Diego County over local objections, SANDAG's recommendations to RGEC for inclusion in the latter's proposal to the Legislature be adopted in full, with the exception of bifurcating the planning and operating functions of local transit. Resolution No. 2001 -139 September 4, 2001 Page Two PASSED and ADOPTED this 4th day of September, 2001 George H. Waters, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: if 4A gi'LlaF George H. Eiser, IH City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .4EETING DATE @per 4, 2001 SECOND READING AGENDA ITEM NO. 16 7ITEM TITLE ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO NOISE CONTROL PREPARED BY Rudolf Hradecky EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT City AttorneyPi Please see attached staff report. ( Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 7- Adopt proposed ordinance. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Staff Report with Attachments "A" through "D" Proposed ordinance. Resolution No. A-200 (9;99) ORDINANCE NO. 2001 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING TITLE 12 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO NOISE CONTROL BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of National City that the National City Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Section 1. That Title 12 is amended by changing the heading and the table of contents to read as follows: TITLE 12 NOISE CONTROL Chapters: 12.02 General Provisions 12.04 Definitions 12.06 Exterior Noise Limits 12.08 Interior Noise Limits 12.10 Prohibited Acts 12.12 Special Provisions and Exemptions 12.14 Sound Trucks 12.16 Exceptions 12.18 Enforcement 12.20 Noise Corridor(s) Map 12.22 Appendices Section 2. That Title 12 is amended in its entirety to read as follows: CHAPTER 12.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS Sections: 12.02.010 Title 12.02.040 Declaration of findings and policy 12.02.060 Criteria Section 12.02.020 Title. The ordinance codified in this title shall be known and may be cited as "The Noise Control Ordinance" of the City of National City. 1 Section 12.02.040 Declaration of fmdings and policy. Whereas, excessive noise and vibration are a serious hazard to the public health and welfare and the quality of life; and Whereas, the people have a right to and should be ensured an environment free from noise and vibration that may jeopardize their health or welfare or degrade the quality of life. Now, therefore, it is the policy of the City to prevent noise and vibration that may jeopardize the health or welfare of its citizens or degrade the quality of life. Section 12.02.060 Criteria. As criteria for this chapter, Table I is a chart showing sound levels and their expected impact in terms of human response. Table II is a list of National Goals for Noise Reduction as set forth by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in their publication "Toward a National Strategy for Noise Control" April 1977. TABLE I SOUND LEVELS AND HUMAN RESPONSE Common Sounds Noise Level (dB) Effect Carrier deck Jet operation Air raid siren 140 Painfully loud Jet takeoff (200 feet) Thunderclap Discotheque Auto horn (3 feet) 130 120 Maximum vocal effort Pile drivers Chain saw (2 feet) 110 Garbage truck 767.10 Power lawn mower (4 feet) 100 Heavy truck (50 feet) City traffic 90 Very annoying Hearing damage (8 hrs) Alarm clock (2 feet) Hair dryer Vacuum cleaner 80 Annoying 2 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT OLD BUSINESS 17 MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. -- ITEM TITLE Discussion of PASACAT's El Toyon Proposal PREPARED BY Ryan Hyland,DEPARTMENT City Manager �c Management A alyst EXPLANATION During the May 1, 2001, City Council meeting PASACAT made a presentation of their proposal to jointly build and operate a new recreation center in El Toyon Park. At Council's request Staff made a preliminary review of the proposal and the results of this preliminary review were sent to Council and PASACAT in a memo dated 6/15/01. This memo is attached. Staff has suggested that a Council discussion take place to address four general questions regarding the proposed project. Staff met with PASACAT to receive updates on the proposal on August 9, however, no new information on financing, project costs, site plans, or other details of the proposal were provided by PASACAT at that time. Representatives from PASACAT will be present at the September 4 City Council meeting to answer any questions. Four basic questions that Staff suggest be addressed before proceeding further with this proposal are: 1) What priority does the Council place on the reconstruction of the El Toyon center with respect to other proposed capital projects in the City? 2) Is the Council comfortable with entering into an agreement to jointly design, operate, and maintain a City facility with an outside party? 3) Where will the City's share of the funding, estimated to be up to $680,000, come from? 4) If Council elects to build a new Library building, an opportunity for the reuse of the current Library may be created. Would Council prefer to relocate El Toyon operations to the current Library location if a new Library is built? Environmental Review ✓ N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the four policy questions be discussed before further research is undertaken. Please see attached preliminary staff review for initial staff concerns on the proposed project. BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board provided a letter of support on 4/9/01— please see attached. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1) Staff Memo to Mayor and Council - Preliminary Proposal Review 6/15/01 2) Letter from El Toyon Neighborhood Watch Group 7/26/01 3) Letter from Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 4/9/01 4) Copy of PASACAT's proposed building sketch 5/11/01 Resolution No. 2001- A-200 (9/80) City Manager's Office Memo To: Mayor and Council From: Ryan Hyland, Management Analyst Jim Ruiz, Parks and Recreation Director CC: J.R. Chantengco, The Triwest Group Date: 6/15/2001 Re: PASACAT El Toyon Proposal - Preliminary Review Summary: PASACAT has made a proposal to partner with the City in the construction and operation of a new El Toyon Arts and Recreation Center. A preliminary Staff review shows that the project might be feasible if significant economic obstacles can be overcome. Staff will copy this memo to PASACAT. We suggest that PASACAT, Staff, and City Council discuss the PASACAT proposal in more detail when the Council returns from the Budget Recess. It is, however, our view that further significant staff time not be invested in this project until Council has had a chance to address the following four general questions: 1) What priority does the Council place on the reconstruction of the El Toyon center with respect to other proposed capital projects in the City? 2) Is the Council comfortable with entering into an agreement to jointly design, operate, and maintain a City facility with an outside party? 3) Where will the City's share of the funding, estimated to be approximately $680,0001, come from? 4) If Council elects to build a new Library building, an opportunity for the reuse of the current Library may be created. Would Council prefer to relocate El Toyon operations to the current Library location if a new Library is built? 1 Cost estimates are very speculative at this point. PASACATs initial total cost estimate of $700,000 has been increased to $900,000. Also, requirements that will be made by the City, including beam and post construction, will likely cause an increase in building costs and thus the total project cost could increase. The City's cost also assumes that PASACAT will receive $220,000 for it's current building, if they receive less the City's portion of the cost could increase. Finally, it is unknown what level of funding Habitat for Humanity may be able to contribute to the project. They have applied for and are hoping to receive grant funding in addition to the in -kind services they would provide. Background: During the May 1, 2001 City Council meeting, Council drected Staff to examine the possibility of partnering with PASACAT to build and operate an Arts and Recreation Center in El Toyon Park. Since that time Staff have been in communication with the developer and have made a preliminary review of the proposal. The proposed Arts and Recreation Center would replace the current City Recreation Center in El Toyon Park. The proposal calls for a 9,000 sq. ft. facility to be built by Habitat for Humanity, AsianAmerican Building Contractors Association, and Sustained Earth Enterprises, with Mr. Drew Hubbell, AIA, as the architect for the project. Of the $900,000 total projected cost presented in the proposal, PASACAT has offered to contribute $220,000. The PASACAT contribution is contingent on the sale of their eirrent building located at 102 E. 164' St. in National City. If the new Arts and Recreation Center were built in the form currently proposed, the City's share of the project cost could be up to $680,000, dependent on the amount of funding that Habitat for Humanity can provide in labor, material, and grant funding. The City's grant consultant has researched options or any grant funds that may be available for the City's portion of the proposed project, but no sources have been identified. Upon initial review it appears that the concept of partnering to build a large Arts and Recreation Center on the site is possible. Concerns about specific project details appear to be workable. However, one major issue that needs to be addressed should Council wishto pursue this project is a funding source for the City's portion of the project. The City will need to identify a source for the estimated $680,000 required in the proposal. Although the proposal is one that seems to be workable, a complete and detailed review of the proposed project will require a large amount Staff time to work through the many issues inherent in partnering with a community group to build and operate a major City facility. Staff recommends that this level of review be delayed until Ccuncil has had an opportunity to address the four general questions listed on page one of this memo. At the time when these questions have been resolved, Staff would recommend that work begin on the more detailed issues of the project. Thisfollowing information is not a comprehensive list of all project details to be addressed, but an outline of some of the initial comments brought forth by departments during the preliminary review of the proposal. Planning: • All standard planning requirements would apply to building on this site. Areas that would need to be addressed include environmental issues, parking requirements, traffic, and building design. • The proposed building is located in a Civic Institutional Zone and this zone does not allow theaters (a theater is proposed as part of the PASACAT proposal) however, a theater may be considered for the park through the Conditional Use Permit process if the theater is just one component of a cultural or recreation center, which it appears • Page 2 to be. This issue will need to be reviewed further to determine whether the theater could be induded in the project. • A Conditional Use Permit would be required as the proposed building would be over twice the size of the existing building. • The proposed building is located in an Open Space Overlay Zone, and therefore specific open space requirements must also be met for project approval. Engineering: • A geotechnical investigation of the proposed building site was undertaken in 1995. In reviewing the results of that investigation it appears that the site would be suitable for the proposed building. • The site would need to be altered to meet engineering requirements. There is an existing 6' to 10' fill within the structure area that would need to be addressed, and a structural engineer would need to design the interior and exterior footings including at least four No. 3 steel reinforcing bars to be placed horizontally in the footings. • A grading plan would also need to be submitted to the Engineering Department Building and Safety: • Although no formal building drawings or plans have been submitted, the proposal does call for the building to be built with straw bale construction. Building and Safety would require that the building be constructed with post and beam constnction using straw bales only for infill. This may add to the initial cost estimate provided by PASACAT. • Any building plans submitted would need to be stamped and signed by a California registered Architect or Engineer, and will have to include engineering calculations for the vertical and lateral loads. • The building must meet all code requirements for type of construction and fire rated walls. City Attorney's Office: • An MOU or other form of agreement would serve to commit the City and the other party to certain obligations concerning the construction and operations of the proposed Arts and Recreation Center.2 • Insurance and liability issues must also be addressed. 2 This issue will require negotiations with PASACAT to determine a wide variety of issues including what areas of the building would be available for use by PASACAT, who would be in charge of scheduling, and what portion of operation and maintenance costs would be assigned to each party. Staff has been in contact with other cities that have successfully worked with community groups to share city buildings, but each agreement is unique to the given situation and requires careful crafting to insure the needs of both parties are met. • Page 3 Parks and Recreation: • All parties will have to collaborate with residents living near El Toyon Park to address neighborhood concerns and gain community support for the project. • Parks and Recreation will need to fully assess the compatibility of the varying uses that would be undertaken at the facility. • Page 4 EL TOYON NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH GROUP July 26, 2001 George Walters, Mayor Nick Inzunza, City Councilman Ron Morrison, City Councilman Mitch Beauchamp, City Councilman Fred Soto, City Councilman City of National City 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950-4397 via Facsimile (619) 336-4239 and Regular Mail Re: Developmental Project - El Toyon Arts and Recreation Center Dear Gentlepersons: I write to you on behalf of the executive committee of the El Toyon Neighborhood Watch Group. It is our understanding — based on newspaper articles and other inquiries — that the proposed project would expand the current activities of the recreation center and the proposed center would be jointly owned and operated by the City of National City and PASACAT. The executive committee opposes approval of the project without prior definitive specification of cost and ownership, control, scope of activity, and impact on the El Toyon Park Neighborhood and National City. We request that the details be provided at the discussion stage so that the City community at -large and the El Toyon Neighborhood may comment and provide input. As to the El Toyon Park Neighborhood, if convenient to you, would you mail the details to me — 2102.Melrose Street, National City, CA 91950. The executive committee would provide the information to our local community at a neighborhood meeting. We could then send a summary of the neighborhood's comments to you. Sincerely, GTM:jh Gerald T. McFadden, Secretary (Work: 619-338-0507) City of National City Parks & Recreation Department 140 East Twelfth Street, Suite A, National City, CA 91950-3312 (619) 336-4290 April 9, 2001 Honorable Mayor George Waters and City Council City of National City Dear Sirs: I have been a member of the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board since 1982, and recently, was selected to Chair this Committee. It has always been a pleasure to work with you as a family because we share the same vision and spirit to improve all facilities for our residents and community. I have made it a priority to always seek and work for all proposals that would be beneficial for the residents of National City. We now have an opportunity that would enhance our exposure as an innovative community in this New Millennium. The project that I would like to propose to you is the new El Toyon Arts & Recreation Center. We seek your support because the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board is convinced the proposed El Toyon Arts & Recreation Center is definitely a win/win opportunity for the City of National City and our community. The Parks & Recreation Advisory Board strongly urge you to support this project. The attached Developmental Project proposal indicates this would be a great asset for our community. Thank you for your time and consideration on his project! incerely, i James Grier, Jr., Chair Parks & Recreation Advisory Board JG:njm Attachment Recycled Paper k`l -E 0YO Ac'IV',"� CEN7TA f dj : FO, !141-1 --1 2.c1 Wd2£:1O I002 TT 'fi'eW 0920i£2 619 : 'ON XHd 1 PgcfnN 8 i taggnN : WOad .AEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT (-ITEM SPptemher 4, 2001 / ITEM TITLE REQUEST FOR USEOF THE COMMUNITY CENTER BY THE NATIONAL CITY COMMUNITY CONCERT BAND AND WAIVER OF FEES PREPARED BY Burton Myers 18 AGENDA ITEM NO. DEPARTMENT Public Works EXPLANATION The National City Community Concert Band is requesting use of the Community Center North Room on Thursday December 6, 2001 for a public concert for the citizens of National City. They are requesting the Center from 9:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. They will be expecting 440 people (including the band). A waiver of fees is also being requested. Costs: Building $1055.40 Custodial 223.40 Total: $1278.80 This is an acceptable category of use according to the Council adopted "Rules and Regulations for the Use of the National City Community Center". Environmental Review Financial Statement X N/A Loss of $1278.80 to the General ' d if waiver of fees is approved. _144) STAFF RECOMMENDAT It is recommended that Cou make a decision regarding t Account No. I approve the se o the Community Center as requested and that Council e waiver of fees. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Application for Use of the Community Center L. Letter from the National City Community Concert Band dated July 6, 2001 Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) APPLICATION FOR USE OF THE NATIONAL CITY TO ALL APPLICANTS: It is strongly recommended that the applicant requesting use of the facility attend the City Council meeting, when the item is going to be discussed in order to answer any questions posed by the City Council. Please refer to the attached copy of "Rules and Regulations." Name of Organization N frTk jiMe, C,Ty 1 OMMUAral �6A CZATe ,34Mb Business Address '7 / i �- Ave, JV. . JJ9�kro Name of Applicant C £''iwM 2464 Address ? 0 £b) 2dt7 Chu IA' Via+.4 CA- co qra Telephone Number ((1I) 2474444 (day) ( ) S,e►a (evening) Type of Function .1--)u &A G CONc eitr Date Requested 12./4/ 0! erut6 D+! Deco iahl1 Ttmd'�*' •? r , r. ih) t$ tr�►•: :"��. Function Time 7 (a4:a to . $.2,0 Use of Kitchen Facility yes a no, , Use Time q • 4 .m) to7 FYi Clean-up r �, . pm) to (am/pm) Number of Participants . 504 maD+46 itiv 35d M ptf *.CL Will Admission be charged? NO If yes, Amount $ Will this event be used as a fund raising event? AR) Will alcohol be served? N a ABC Permit Submitted? Certificate of Insurance attached? He eitamthA, 3 euS QN 41 Special configuration of tables or chairs required? Y CS (I attach sketch) 4 .4o liow Special equipment required? 2. M 1Xa S (If yes, attached list) 1+ $$oW'» 1' Rts Copy of Rules & Regulations provided? �je..5 Initial I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE RECEIVED Al COPY OF THE RULES & REGULATIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER, AND I AGREE FOR MY ORGANIZATION TO CONFORM TO ALL OF ITS PROVISIONS. Applicant recognizes and understands that use of the City's facility may create a possessory interest subject to property taxation and that Applicant may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest. Applicant further agrees to pay any and all property taxes, if any assessed during the use of the City's facility pursuant to Sections 107 and 107.6 of the Revenue and Taxation Code against Applicant's possessory interest in the City's facility. Signature ofApp f nt 0 /0/ Date CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a inintmum off $1,,04D 0 0 t* ifidd ' lit aiiisur Ee ,for trOa{ly injury and property 44 damage which includes Alb City,,its"officials, agents and.empioyees named as additional insured ani 4 �7 vgn: e Hod, . to Ss, 4greenr7t, t %Ce $e of lisurance must be attached to this pem fo &`". Orgpization Person ischarge of activitY,'�`+ Address ivnoviof,•u )e.R.,lli�fi.{ ..jv.Jyya� '7 f A- Ala /t/ Z; Telephone o107-4,,A0-6 City facilities and/or property requested Co ► int A4 4 Date(s) of tiSe'° • HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersignedM rel gre 7 te',l14416.€he Citye' of National City harmless and indemnif the City of National City from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigao`n ind liability arising out of or related to the use of public property by permittee's agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Applicant 8614i) j);tta& Official Title Date Certificate of Insurance Approved by Name & Title Revt 1/2140 2 Burt Myers City of National City July 6,2001 On behalf of the National City Community Concert Band I am requesting the use of the National City Community Building on December 6,2001 for a free public concert for the citizens of National City and their friends. I am also requesting that any fees normally charged for such use of the building be waived. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. C. Edward Reed Director, NCCCB -1EETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT September 4, 200.1 AGENDA ITEM NO. 19 / ITEM TITLE REQUEST FOR USE OF THE COMMUNITY CENTER BY THE NATIONAL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND WAIVER OF FEES PREPARED BY Burton Myers DEPARTMENT Public Works EXPLANATION The National City Chamber of Commerce is requesting use of the Community Center on Wednesday October 10, 2001 for the 44`h Annual Salute to Navy Luncheon. They are requesting the Center from 9:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. They will be expecting approximately 150 military and civilian guests. A waiver of fees is also being requested. Costs: Building $703.56 Kitchen 60.00 Custodial 111.70 Total: $875.26 This is an acceptable category of use according to the Council adopted "Rules and Regulations for the Use of the National City Community Center". Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Loss of $875.26 to the General Fu • if waiver of fees is approved. STAFF RECOMMENDATION / It is recommended that Cou erg/ e the use othe Community Center as requested and that Council make a decision regarding the waiver of fees. Account No. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) - Application for Use of the Community Center Letter from the National City Community Chamber of Commerce dated August 16, 2001 Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) AUG 14 2001 12:07PM HP LRSERJET 3200 Apr-30-01 11:23A P.2 P.04 APPLICATION FOR USP,, OF THF. NATIONAL CITY TO Al.i.APPLICANTS: It is strongly recommended that the applicant requesting use of the facility attend the City Council meeting, when the item is going to he discussed in order to answer any questions posed by the City Council. Please refer to the attached copy of "Rules and Regulations." Name of Organization Business Address Nigtionpt City Chamber of CoMmerce 711 "A" Avenue - National. City, CA 91950-2228 Name of Applicant . A Hone s Chief Executive Offi Address 711 "A" Avortt+d - National City,. CA 91950- Telephonc Number ( 619_) 477-9339 (day) (ma) 475-67.24 Type of Function ; . paluta to Nt..W aek tNell Date Requested -- WednmadaX,- Mtober 10, 2001 Decorating Time ..2 .Q0 A,.ltt. (am/pm) to _],Lpp_.A.M. Function Time 11:04 g.M. _ .. (tom/pm) to 2:00 P.M. Use of Kitchen Facility X ycs no Use Time . 4 M A.M. (am/pm) to 3:00 P.M. Clean-up 2:00 P.M. (am/pin) to 3:00 P.M. Number of Participants 200 Will Admission be charged? your Erich If yes, Amount S no Will this event he used as a fund raising event? 'iqo cer 2228 (evening) Will alcohol be served? NO AMC Permit Submitted? Certificate of Insurance attached? . vFS (" Special conllguration.nf tables or chairs required? _ :. (If yes, attach sketch) Special equipment required? (If yes, attached list) P.A. - Stage - Flag Copy of Rules & Regulations provided? yg. Initial '4/ I CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE RECEIVED A COPY OF THE RULES & REGULATIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY CENTER, AND VAGREE FOR MY ORGANIZATION -I-ct CONFORM TO ALL OF ITS PROVISIONS. .(am/pm) (am/pm) (azn/poi) (am/pm) Applicant recognizes and understands that use of the. City's ,facility may create a lx>ssesno y interest suhfeet to property taxation and that Applicant truly he.cutjt'ct to the payment of property tuxes levied on such interest. Applicant, further agrees to pay any and all property taxes, if any assessed during the WO of the CYty s facility pursuant to Sections 107 and 107.6 of the Revenue and Taxation Code against Applicant's possessvey interest in the City. sfitc:ility. Signature of Applicant Uata p.3 RUG 14 2001 12:07PM HP LASERJET 3200 Apr-30-01 11:24A CI'Py OF NATIONAL CiTY PURI,IC PROPICRTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMiFiCATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum orSi3OOO,0OO combined singlc limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials. agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of Insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization NATIONAL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Person is charge or activity Edith Hushes or Jeff Phipps Address 11 "A=' Av rnii. National City Telephone (619) 477-9339 City facilities and/or property requested Gaarsonity Center — 140 East 12th Street Date(s) of use Wednesday. October 10L 2001 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned hereby agree(s) to hold the City of National City harmless and indemnify the City of National City from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation and liability arising out of or related to the use of public property by permittec's agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Applicant F .e�L�• c,/i f./oi Official Title 'Bate Certificate of Insurance Approved by -- Name & Title Rev. 1 /21 /00 2 P.05 AUG 16 2001 3:45PM HP LASERJET 3200 p.1 HE August 16, 2001 ATTENTION: Burt Myers Pubic Ways Department 122443of NN,, , cintlyCittoulevard National i~, ,`CA91950 711 A Avenue Nakano! City, CA 91950-2228 Business: 619 d77.9339 Fox: 619 4775018 E-mail: neee@cvhsa.com www.natiaroteitychomber.org Dear Bud: This is to that the City waive fees and any other charges associated with using the Community for the 44th Annual Sara to Navy Luncheon. The event valt take place on Syr October 10, 2001. As in the past, the event is held b4 btthe Chamber he C pof y Commerce, hosted by the KKiwanis ebb of National City, with the support We expect more than 150 military and civilian guests, to include the City Counct, City Deparknent heads and other appointed and elected officials from throughout the region. The event wl be catered. We w need to use the ktchen, tables and chairs, as welt as the speaker system in the Comrrnxuty Bulking. All c for equipment be provided by the caterer. Thank you for your consideration and support of this request. Sincerely, ea2,4,4 Edith Hughes Chief Executive Officer 'Building for the New Millennium" TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - National City Library — National City Celebrates Literacy 1� �i'andReading is Fundamental Book Giveaway/Chili Cook Off PREPARED audia Caro, Permit Tech. V DEPARTMENT°Building and Safety EXPLANATION This is a request from the National City Library to conduct their annual National City Celebrates Literacy, Reading is Fundamental Book Giveaway and 16t annual Chili cook off from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, October 20, 2001. The request includes the use of the Library and Community Center Parking lots, the Library and Community Center buildings, the sale of food and drink, portable stage with sound system, game booths, chili and salsa tasting contest and permission to hang banners on city buildings. A waiver of fees is requested. The event and sponsoring organization meet the criteria in City Council Policy No. 704 for a waiver of fees. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement The City has incurred $554.00 in costs: $234 in processing the ! ove appIVicaYion t ouiglaozatiamarCity Departments and $320.00 for Public Works. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ..tEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 20 ITEM TITLE 7you.ae_e_0(..).zteeed Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval and grant the waiver of fees. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Application for a Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and Conditions of Approval. A-200 (9:99) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND/OR STIPULATIONS SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: National City Public Library DATES OF ACTIVITY: Saturday, October 20, 2001 LOCATION OF ACTIVITY: 200 East 12th Street Community Center and Library Parking Lot TIME: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. APPROVALS: POLICE RISK MANAGER CITY ATTORNEY PLANNING FIRE YES [x] NO [ ] YES [ x ] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [ x ] NO [ ] YES [ x ] NO [ ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] PUBLIC WORKS YES [ x ] NO [ ] PARKS & REC YES [ x ] NO [ ] NOTE: HEALTH DEPT WAS NOTIFIED VIA FAX 8/6/01 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FIRE (336-4550) SEE COMMENTS[x] SEE COMMENTS[ ] SEE COMMENTS[x] SEE COMMENTS[ ] SEE COMMENTS[x ] SEE COMMENTS[x ] SEE COMMENTS[X] SEE COMMENTS[x ] 1. If cook -off entrants intend to use charcoal they must provide metal containers for coal disposal. 2. Tents or canopies may require permits. Contact the Fire Department. 3. Do not block Fire Department access. FINANCE (336-4330) 1. A Business License is required if monies are solicited, admittance charged or food, beverages or merchandise is sold. Each separate vendor must have a separate business license. 2. Vendors currently licensed by the City may operate on their existing license. If any of the vendors or organizations are registered for not -for -profit there will be no charge for their Business License. 3. A list of all participating vendors (with their address, phone number and current National City Business License number) is to be submitted to the Revenue and Recovery Division of the Finance Department prior to the event for verification of business numbers. PARKS AND REC (336-4290) 1. Will coordinate with City departments. POLICE (336-4400) 1. Two senior volunteers and two reserves will be assigned to work the event. No cost. CITY ATTORNEY (336-4220) 1. Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement, and a policy of general liability insurance with the City and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with the amounts of coverage to be determined by the Risk Manager. PUBLIC WORKS (336-4580) 1. Street Division will post "No Parking" signs and deliver barricades during working hours prior to the event. 2. Facilities Maintenance Division will provide power cords and supply laid out prior to the event and pick up at the end of the event (Electrician-4 hours/ $120.00). 3. Collect and set up tables and chairs prior to the event, collect and return tables and chairs to the buildings after the event (Custodian-8 hours/$200.00). Type of Event: _ Public Concert _ Fair _ Parade _ Demonstration _ Motion Picture _ Grand Opening _ Festival X Community Event _ Circus _ Block Party Other Event Title: 3-Vtoviit- C/ -tee? 114. - t(o'th AC ' Event Location: Commuvt.it'/ CevtVer , Li1ova ,/ i Comm/Hun +Y C41/44f4' .ii l..ilorary'avV•tvua Event Date(s): From to Otto t o V 20 `o I Total Anticipated Attendance: S ocX) Lo Month/Day/Year ( 692 participants) (4Spectators) Actual Event Hours: I v a� le pm to 3 am ri Setup/assembly/construction Date: to I lct tot Start time: t,.iat; vt Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details): "Table", g4/1or1e47 12? wtsV'3 'oriablo ZF2 A 5ouwci S A6wl • Dismantle Date: to yo o I Completion Time: 5 arc List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event. Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of reopening. Sponsoring Organization: t lfit?L.. tyievtd$ e iVit, L ,Yary For Profit ll XC Not -for -Profit Chief Officer of Organization (Name) Aill vi.e, awiploe1� Applicant (Name): 1.Iivta- �orAY-otnn t Address: CO2�2�ai • 12 S rec IU2 r ovtat C-ir GA 9 19rvb Daytime Phone: ((oil) 334) • 4?(o2Evening Phone: ( ) Fax: (Coll) 334v • 42143 Contact Person "on site" day of the event: A wwe, Gawttolo& i Pager/Cellular: NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST BE IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO CIYY OFFICIALS 1 Is your organization a "Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? & YES NO Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? X_ YES _ NO If YES, please explain the ose purpand'provide aiinount(s): �A' ►`^� - avexvea -: of ' .& ,eiv t' r $ 356. Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this event. $ I DOO . Estimated Expenses for this event. S t� What is the projected amount of:revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive as a result of this event? Please provide a DETAILED DESCRIPTION of your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides or any other pertinent information about the event. lead►N� `S 'C'"W ev*a\ • bad;,iv& awa1 tiuyiGa\ &w eAtkaiv►men+ , col u.w 4r�� floodw�vco ir►5, CVnAc`ye i GY2.t iS f pia,VWe,e7 lvcD'[t(•s 2Yk ?/M' 2* ► " (241;iki CD • 2 _ YES Z. NO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? YES _ NO Will items or services be sold at the event? If -yes, please describe: �A1ttPrwtS O iY Worn - rrot-tt4. _ YES X NO Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. X YES _ NO Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach a detailed site map showing all streets impacted by the event. In addition to the route map required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and set-up locations for the following items: ➢ Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession and/or Beer Garden areas. ➢ Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas Please describe how food will be served at the event: ¥Town -Vaiatede, u QX o\c e . If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: i< GAS X ELECTRIC X CHARCOAL OTHER (Specify): ➢ Portable and/or Permanent Toilet Facilities Number of portable toilets: (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there are facilities in the immediate area available to the public • during the' event) : - . ➢ Tables and Chairs ➢ Fencing, barriers and/or barricades ➢ Generator locations and/or source of electricity ➢ Canopies or tent locations (include tent/canopy dimensions) ➢ Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures ➢ , Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages,.grandstands or related structures ➢ ' Vehicle's al d/or (railers• . ➢ Other related event components not covered above ➢ Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be returned to a clean condition.) Number of trash cans: Trash containers with lids: Describe your plan for clean-up and removal of waste and garbage during and after the event: Use- of i't'a51n ca-vv=r 3 Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Security: io►� 'VD 1u.vi ee.Y ;.4v1)1 toYr�w'E' ak AAn.e evevd . YES ZC NO Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangements for this event? If YES, please list: Security Organization: Security Organization Address: Security Director (Name): Phone: YES X NO Is this a night event? If YES, please state hoW the event and•surrounding area will be illuminated to ensure safety of the participants and spectators: Please indicate what arrangement you have made for providingFirst FM taffing and Equipment. A 2-wa v-adic wit\ the ow -kid koCI 4� 4�� A Please describe your Accessibility Plan for access at your event by individualswith disabilitADAliies: '1\ne. L:bvay.� C..45w wiwn�1''Y ��e w-F&Y' r ompl w► P.oiu\ iov►S . • Please provide a detailed description of your PARKING plan:' 1 I �1y �o b a`� r„ e t• 2d i rt �avloa� q ��Yllnv�gi �w o �te�d A 3� avv 2: a Iou.Siv►q . 4 A Please describe your plan for DISABLED PARKING: ASV Vibe" C/wrlotii d e, ,w oofr Ll ttoYale Si 1 .51 ..1►n ,praaeer ►w 10.1r adiaoenA" o 10loaik f ie1d Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event:: kt 1 1 � I A- vokiCIGSAlovi k.eikbir l�li�� wailed 72 wan.) ivvioY kt *re eve,,n4 NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. X YES _ NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: I Number of Bands: Type of Music: iilr►vti X' YES _ NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Start time: to pm Finish Time 3 a� X YES _ NO Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? If YES, please indicate: Start time: m Finish Time I Orpm Please describe the sound equipment that willlbe used for your event: 1_ raYY� 4 V-Pic4'e iovti % 70uvtW aiuY�irwt&vt'c _ YES XC NO Fireworks, rockets, or other pyrotechnics? If YES, please describe: X YES _ NO Any signs, banners, decorations, special lighting? If YES, please describe: 9Ce•-rtV/ei bawwe c 109.1,toovt4 5 For Office Ilse Only Department ; Date Yes No Condition(s) of Approval Specific Conditions of Approval Initial BUILRECEIAVECEP'i.... AUG 0 3 2001 A.fIONAL cyrtoCALIF. 6 3 Non-profit organizations, which meet the criteria on page v of the instructions, will be considered for a waiver. If you would like to request a waiver of the processing fees, please complete the questionnaire below. 1. Is the event for which the TUP is sought sponsored by a non-profit organization? V Yes (proceed to Question 2) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 2. Please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the TUP is sought and then proceed to Question 3. Name of the sponsoring organization ieinzke2 o IA6'31'1 Type of Organization C,oSexy ice-, (Service Club, Church, Social Service Agency, etc.) 3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds t the sponsoring organization? Yes (Please proceed to Question 4) 1� No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 4. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. No (Please proceed to QO on 5) 5. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. No (Please proceed to Question 6) 6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. No (Please proceed to Question 7) 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes Year funds were received: Funds were used to: Signa ure No (P lease sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) Date -o7- o/ 9 City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless ' Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization taC1r1.. �+ v�ewc� oic tltie 1.,101-aYT Person in Charge of Activity Awwe, Ca,N,rloe« Address ?-co 124b S-ree r a4C ii f CA- `I tqc p Telephone c (ote) 33fo - 4.3(02. Date(s) of Use to 7-o 1 01 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned hereby agree(s) to hold the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City harmless and indemnify the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation and liability arising out of or related to the use of public property by permutes or permitee's agents, employees or contractors. Signot U eVa0r CALAveaaIt Cmrdarior" Official Title yy Date oe of (o t 1-or Office Use Only Certificate of Insurance Approved Date 7 AEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21 (-ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — McCUNE-CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH-JEEP USED VEHICLE TENT SALE PREPARED BY Claudia Caro, Permit Tec1DEPARTMEN1 EXPLANATION Building and Safety This is a request from McCune -Chrysler -Plymouth -Jeep to conduct a three day used vehicle tent sale on Lot 2 at the Plaza Bonita Shopping Center, from Friday September 21— Sunday September 23, 2001. The hours of the sale are 9:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. They will have D.J. music for entertainment from 10 a.m. through 6 p.m. during the event. Environmental Review N/A rFinat is to tr Departments. n ed $115.00 in costs in processing the T.U.$ through various City Finance Director Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval. ,--evieute BOARDA/ COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution o. Application For A trvemporary Use Permit with recommended conditions of approval A-200 (2, 99) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED Conditions of Approval SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: McCune Chrysler Plymouth Jeep EVENT: Used Vehicle Tent Sale DATE OF EVENT: September 21-23, 2001 TIME: 9:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. APPROVALS: PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] POLICE YES [ x 1 NO [ 1 SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SPECIFIC Conditions of Approval: FIRE (336-4550) 1. Exit ways to be maintained in an unobstructed manner at all times. Exit way to be clear of all obstruction for it's entire width and length. 2. Fire extinguishers shall be on premises, type 2-A:10-BC. Travel distance not to exceed seventy five (75) feet. 3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided and maintained at a width of 20 feet and a vertical clearance of 13'6" at all times. 4. Fire hydrants and fire suppression connections and appliances shall not be blocked or obstructed at any time. 5. Fire Department permit is required for the used of canopies or tents. Permit fee is sixty five dollars ($65.00). Permit to be obtained from Fire Department. 6. Site map showing size, location, and configuration of tent, canopies, vehicle locations and placement of event on property. 7. Canopies and tents are to be constructed of a flame resistant material with the California State Fire Marshal seal of approval attached. 8. Vehicles are not to be parked within twenty (20) feet of tents or canopies. FINANCE (336-4330) A business license is required of all vendors and businesses participating in the special event. Each separate vendor must have a separate business license. Merchants licensed for the site can operate on their current license. Type of Event: _ Public Concert Parade Motion Picture Fair Demonstration _ Grand Opening Festival / Community Event Circus .Other Lie 5' AL j — Block Party Event Title: 6-1/"J I us E) 0112 CLFARRCE 91- Event Location: PLAZ. r} BoDAL I 1 Event Date(s): From 9 - 1 to I ` .`.! Total Anticipated Attendance: 2w Month/Day/Year ( ) Participants) (� (IgO Spectators) Actual Event Hours: - 1 a�/pm to 1® a Setup/assembly/construction Date: g Start time: ) 1 4M Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details): TN WS-LL CO OP f� r NFt3 F ci-S c/IiS Dismantle Date: v �2(4 Completion Time: arrm List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event. Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of reopening.,0 Sponsoring Organization: !?c Cf%N To To es Chief Officer of Organization7(Namen)/l T9& �; ,t ) Applicant (Name): i f OK)' / " `C c(�tli � ( � Address: 3 �L i e )) i i) iJ /i L CI) Yt &LLib / 7 Daytime Phone: (6 f�/ t^177 " 110 \ Evening /Phone: (6 IS 477- I10 I Fax: (419) 4I i�� 53`10 Contact Person "on site" day of the event: CUR r F ►o / I? Yf� Pager/Cellular: ICJ ,/ 3o ' J1 g or Profit Not -for -Profit NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST BE IN AT NE ANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO CJ1 Y OFFICIALS 1 Is your organization a "Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? If YES, please explain the purpose and provide amount(s): YES NO YES %. NO Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from $200©00 $ this event. ® Estimated Expenses for this event. What is the projected amount of revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive as a result of this event? Please provide a DETAILED DESCRIPTION of your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides or any other pertinent information about the event. 6274 rr Vsrb co-Q T-E,SOLE r0 2 To El Cm/WI Lfl Y Sov i 1-1 137A `tJ 2 _ YES ).NO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? YES eilL0 Will items or services be sold at the event? If yes, please describe: U5E JEHSCL%S — YES NO Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. YES $NO Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach a detailed site map showing all streets impacted by the event. In addition to the route map required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and set-up locations for the following items: ➢ Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession and/or Beer Garden areas. ➢ Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas J /� Please describe how food will be served at the event: A / ' J If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: GAS ELECTRIC CHARCOAL OTHER (Specify): > Portable and/or Permanent Toilet Facilities Number of portable toilets: (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there are facilities in the immediate area available to the public during the event) > Tables and Chairs ➢ Fencing, barriers and/or barricades > Generator locations and/or source of electricity ➢ Canopies or tent locations (include tent/canopy dimensions) ➢ Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures ➢ Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages, grandstands or related structures ➢ Vehicles and/or trailers ➢ Other related event components not covered above ➢ Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be returned to a clean condition.) Number of trash cans: Trash containers with lids: Describe your plan for clean-up and removal of waste and garbage during and after the event: LT w LL 3 ' spa, tq0 j msj-1 P :FA) PLi GS 3 Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Security: SeCviu-urLL coo( W r} MALL 6 ccc2pri� _ YES 1O Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangements for this event? If YES, please list: YES Security Organization: Security Organization Address: Security Director (Name): Phone: O Is this a night event? If YES, please state how the event and surrounding area will be illuminated to ensure safety of the participants and spectators: Please inOicate what arrangement you have made for providing First Aid Staffing and Equipment. t")U( STO11 aosT- ia`LL. gE LS Please describe your Accessibility Plan for aces at your event by individuals with disabilities: L)o TP -c (*5 Please provide a detailed description of your PARKING plan: ojJ , 6 -Ire_ Q (z i^'1CI_ PPQ L J G /46A-- 4 Please describe your plan for DISABLED PARKING: MALL PARYa7klC--- Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event: 2 r btO / J eG Q ( C- N c1)S pRipo NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. YES _ NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the numbereof stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: ��v/ Number of Bands: Type of Music: I) 'M U ss. C YES _ NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Start time: m Finish Time _Z ant60 _ YES NO Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? If YES, please indicate: Start time: am/pm Finish Time am/pm Please describe the sound equipment that will be used for your event: _ YES) NO Fireworks, rockets, or other pyrotechnics? If YES, please describe: _ YES O Any signs, banners, decorations, special lighting? If YES, please describe: 5 For Office Use Only Department Date Yes No Condition(s) of Approval Initial Specific Conditions of Approval 6 City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization p C C1»JE (VI OTO Ps Person in Charge of Activity 6FO /26-E 5/1LM t f Address Telephone C°'/ 9 77 —131) 31(O k1R —4.000Q, cite BLkb )0C qfq-CO Date(s) of Use 1-0-1) TROUGH} -2 3 g I 9 —93 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT As a condition of the issuance of a temporary use permit to conduct its activities on public or private property, the undersigned hereby agree(s) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, losses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage, or both, or any litigation and other liability, including attorneys fees and the costs of litigation, arising out of or related to the use of public property or the activity taken under the permit by the permittee or its agents, employees or contractors. a Signature of Applicant 1//g /61/ Official Title Date For Office Use Only Certificate of Insurance Approved Date 7 AUG 20 '01 01:35PM PLAZA BONITA Facsimile DATE: $.1 k) t TO: CQQI,ccat-ex-, COMPANY: FACSIMILE NUMBER: FROM: PHONE NUMBER: 619 267-2850 NO. OF PAGES: WOW- SHOPPING TOW14( PLAZA BONITA 3030 Plaza Bonita Road National City. CA 91950 Telephone (019) 251.2B50 Facatmlle (B19) 472.5052 eae '4,t) tivittiok, ,t94N-tt;tt,(._. c wle & Kt, , Utothe CenlatuIZANib gA40( 01-0-gz4 6A, d 9121,-093 (OID.t .%2€ /IIwl� (9 i.e. ru, ht e. ' The contents of thla facsimile (including attachments) may be privileged andyconridentiai. My unauthorized use of the contents is expressly prohibited. tf you have received the document in error, please advise us by telephone (reverse charges) Immediately and then shred the document. Thank you. .iEETING DATE CEnvironmental Review City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 22 ITEM TITLE PREPARED BY EXPLANATION TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — WESTCOTT MAZDA KIA- USED VEHICLE TENT SALE Claudia Caro, Permit Tec1DEPARTMENT Building and Safety This is a request from Westcott Mazda Kia to conduct a three day used vehicle tent sale on Lot 2 at the Plaza Bonita Shopping Center, from Friday September 14— Sunday September 16, 2001. The hours of the sale are 10:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. They will have D.J. music for entertainment from 11 a.m. through 6 p.m. during the event. N/A Fina is ®ta ement Departments. ed $115.00 in costs in processing the T.U. i 4hrough various City Finance Director Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval. 0-nzatk4As BOARD // COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Rlution o. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended conditionse o 'Dapproval A-200 (9.99) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED Conditions of Approval SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: Westcott Mazda Kia EVENT: Used Vehicle Tent Sale DATE OF EVENT: September 14-16, 2001 TIME: 10:00 a.m. until 9:00 p.m. APPROVALS: PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] POLICE YES [ x 1 NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ 1 SPECIFIC Conditions of Approval: FIRE (336-4550) 1. Exit ways to be maintained in an unobstructed manner at all times. Exit way to be clear of all obstruction for it's entire width and length. 2. Fire extinguishers shall be on premises, type 2-A:10-BC. Travel distance not to exceed seventy five (75) feet. 3. Fire Department access roads shall be provided and maintained at a width of 20 feet and a vertical clearance of 13'6" at all times. 4. Fire hydrants and fire suppression connections and appliances shall not be blocked or obstructed at any time. 5. Fire Department permit is required for the used of canopies or tents. Permit fee is sixty five dollars ($65.00). Permit to be obtained from Fire Department. 6. Site map showing size, location, and configuration of tent, canopies, vehicle locations and placement of event on property. 7. Canopies and tents are to be constructed of a flame resistant material with the California State Fire Marshal seal of approval attached. 8. Vehicles are not to be parked within twenty (20) feet of tents or canopies. FINANCE (336-4330) A business license is required of all vendors and businesses participating in the special event. Each separate vendor must have a separate business license. Merchants licensed for the site can operate on their current license. Type of Event: _ Public Concert Parade Motion Picture Event Title: Fair Demonstration _ Grand Opening _ Festival 'Community Event _ Circus _ Block Party Other \AI �t c� r-rabi71\P- t so LE Event Location: p L Z 1'P p r' j Event Date(s): From _a of _„ o q- ( e Total Anticipated Attendance: Month/Day/Year ( Participants) Spectators) Actual Event Hours: I!) Ppm to L am t� Setup/assembly/construction Date:O ti -2o -0/Start time: iij Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details): Se_.c. 0 w w L A..Q. ve, P guA 3016t) g"l,- 4 4- Dismantle Date: p 9/ Dlr Completion Time: 6 lain am/pm List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event. Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of reopening. Sponsoring Organization: Chief Officer of Organization (Name) Applicant (Name): Vje - (I0 �-�- '�� Address:0i !' ' 1rr `t°p U A- I. Evening Phone: Contact Person "on site" day of the event:m S /ls Pager/Cellular: ,'Q— 7 3 j% 71i NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST BE IN ATTiDANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO CI1Y:OFFICIALS Daytime Phone: or Profit r Not -for -Profit 1 R 7 2T Fax: l L f Y4 L, / 1 Is your organization a "Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? _ YES NO Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? _ YES _r410 • If YES, please explain the purpose and provide amount(s): $ ,ed Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this event. $ 30, Crt9V Estimated Expenses for this event. $ What is the projected amount of revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive as a result of this event? Please provide a DETAILED DESCRIPTION of your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides or any other pertinent. information about the event. SR& F/t/GiV [14 2 YES NO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? YES _ NO Will items or services be sold at the event? If yes, please describe: f' _ YES O Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the irection of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. YES %LNO Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach a detailed site map showing all streets impacted by the event. In addition to the route map required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and set-up locations for the following items: ➢ Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Contusion and/or Beer Garden areas. ➢ Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas �% Please describe how food will be served at the event: If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: GAS ELECTRIC CHARCOAL OTHER (Specify): ➢ Portable and/or Permanent Toi t Facilities Number of portable toilets: (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there a facilities in the immediate area available to the public J during the event) V ➢ Tables and Chairs 6. Fencing, barriers and/or barricades Q= ➢ Generator locations and/or source of electricity ➢ Canopies or tent locations (include tent/canopy dimensions) �©X b C7 ➢ Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures ➢ Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages, grandstands or related structures ➢ Vehicles and/or trailers ➢ Other related event components not covered above ➢ Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be returned to a clean condition.) Number of trash cans: /5 Trash containers with lids: Describe your plan for clean-up and removal of waste and garbage du 'ng and after the event: fib- 11-"isiilAddA.4� t ' `6 0 3 PI =. - describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Sec rity: 0 e Q� YES NO Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangements for this event? If YES, please list: /40 t-ei i /, e 3-6 @.c e. Security Organization: Security Organization Address: 1rgdq gJ Lel) Phone: a/�J73 & p �` Security Director (Name): V i' C. felt _YES _I/10 Is this a night event? If YES, please state how the event and surrounding area wipe illuminated to en ure a"�of the participants and S�prs: Ct Y.�� P indicate what arrangement you have made for providing First Aid sing and Equipment. errt Plea d 'be your A ibility Plan for access, at your event by individuals with di abiiitips: , n"(All —511a ,i.‘ Please provide a detailed dription of your PARKING plan: 4 PleasA describe your for DISABLE91 PARKING: nn_ eepte47 VIII. a o rx-Cv--a Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the eve�rtt: n V.1 P fkilLat. (k k ,004.i9sphti,oek-k9C, NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. ,RYES _ NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: Number of Bands: Type of Music: C ezif AYES _ NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Start time: t' A am/pm Finish Time @ pill am/pm YES X NO Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? If YES, please indicate: Start time: ji am/pm Finish Time 4//9 am/pm Please describe the sound equipment that will be used for your event: ©e A , , E'er Fireworksrocketsor other pyrotechnics? If le describe: YES _ NO YES, p YES _ NO Any signs, banners, decorations, special lighting? If YES, please describe: n e ci .f his Ali 5 For Office 'Use OnCy Department Date Yes No Condition(s) of Approval Initial Specific Conditions of Approval 6 City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization Person in Charge of Activity Address Telephone Date(s) of Use HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT As a condition of the issuance of a temporary use permit to conduct its activities on public or private property, the undersigned hereby agree(s) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, losses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage, or both, or any litigation and other liability, including attorneys fees and the costs of litigation, arising out of or related to the use of public property or the activity taken under the permit by the permittee or its agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Appli ant e,„itY\ g/i /6) I Official Title Date ]-or Office Use Only Certificate of Insurance Approved Date 7 P.1 RUG 17 '01 11:14AM PLAZA BONITA Facsimile DATE: `1 t 61 TO: COMPANY: FACSIMILE NUMBER: FROM: PHONE NUMBER: 619 267-2850 NO. OF PAGES: 'Westfield SHOPPINOTOWN PLAZA BONITA 9090 Plata Bonita Road National City, CA 91950 Telephone (619) 26T2850 Facsimile (619) 472.5652 --M0.32t ".CtAd4- (6d4- "/4-414 .441!;;, 0 I Ct-C: tf26tj' 641-- rt>11'61.6'. rho contents of this facsimile (including attachments) may tie privileged and confidentlai. Any unauthorized use of the contents is expressly prohibited 11 you nave received the document at error. please advise 115 by telephone (reverse charges) immediately and then shred the document Thank you City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 23 7—ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION -- CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON AN EXISTING BUILDING ADJACENT TO AND EAST OF THE SAN DIEGO TROLLEY LINE BETWEEN 21ST AND 22m STREETS. (APPLICANT: SPRINT PCS) (CASE FILE NO. CUP-2001-4) PREPARED Y DEPARTMENT Andrew Hoskinso / Planning EXPLANATION The project site is a 29,621 square foot property east of the San Diego Trolley Line between 215` and 22nd Streets. It is just north of the trolley station. The long, narrow parcel is in the Light Manufacturing Residential (MLR) zone and is occupied by A -American Storage. The two large, 26-foot tall buildings on the property are visible from Interstate 5, which is just beyond the Trolley line to the west. Sprint PCS, proposes to place a total of nine antennas on the north, south and east sides of the building at the south end of the property. The 51-inch long by 12-inch wide antennas will be mounted near the top of the walls and painted to match the building. They will extend four inches from the wall and appear as small architectural features. Necessary equipment for the wireless facility will be in a 306 square foot lease space inside the same building. Roof access will be from within the building. The facility will be umanned, and will typically be visited once a month for service. At the August 6, 2001 Planning Commission meeting the applicant explained that co -location was not an option since the service goals of the project could not be achieved by siting its antennas at nearest wireless communications facilities. There was no public opposition to the project. The Commission approved the proposal, finding it to provide a desirable, stealth design. (-Environmental Review X N/A Exempt Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission and recommends that the Notice of Decision be filed.Cr T6e BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit. Vote: Ayes — Flores, Valderrama, Ungab, Baca, Reynolds Absent: Parra Abstain: Detze ATTACHMENTS (lists �j Bew 1 L3 1. Planning Commission resolution No. 28-2001 2. Location Map . Elevations of A -American Storage Building with Wireless Antennas Resolution No. A-200 (9/60) RESOLUTION NO. 28-2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY ON AN EXISTING BUILDING ADJACENT TO AND EAST OF THE SAN DIEGO TROLLEY LINE BETWEEN 21sT AND 22ND STREETS APPLICANT: SPRINT PCS CASE FILE NO. CUP-2001-4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit application for a wireless communications facility on an existing building adjaeent and east of the San Diego Trolley line between 21St and 22nd Streets at a duly advertised public hearing held on August 6 2001, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. CUP-2001-4 maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on August 6, 2001, support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the wireless communications facility will be located within and on an existing industrial building. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the wireless facility is unmanned and will typically be visited only once a month for maintenance activities, and since the site can be accessed from a paved alley or from a parking lot established for the trolley and existing businesses in the building. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the bulk of the equipment will be located inside an existing building, and since the nine small panel antennas located on the outside of the building will appear as architectural features and will be painted to match the building. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since it will improve the performance of wireless communications devices, which is demanded by many customers. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use Permit authorizes a wireless communications facility at 525 W. 20t. Street. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibit A -Revised, Case File no. CUP-2001-4, dated 5/24/01. 2.. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Plumbing, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations. 3. The permittee shall not object to co -locating additional facilities of other communication companies and sharing the project site, provided such shared use does not result in substantial technical or quality -of -service impairment for the permitted use. In the event a dispute arises with regard to co -locating with other existing or potential users, the City may require a third party technical study at the expense of either or both the applicant or the complaining user. This condition in no way obligates the City to approve any co -location proposal if it is determined by the City not to be desirable in a specific case. 4. Any antennas, equipment or facilities that are abandoned, decommissioned, or become obsolete shall be removed. 5. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation 6. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CER17kICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of August 20, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: i. Flores, Valderrama, Ungab, Baca, Reynolds NAYS: ABSENT: Parra ABSTAIN: 13�tz.er PROPOSED WIRELE ANTENNAS 1-5 EXISTING BUILDINGS PROJECT SITE ZONE BOUNDARIES — N A LOCATION MAP 525 W. 20th Street CUP-2001-4 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 7/19/01 INITIAL HEARING: 8/6/01 ( MilearA <001A st-cr leo or moo& 1 3 a a le Q 1 0 z tri 0 (9 Town '% 4 j,./ A i• •-• e9 amp 811158 \-01 99019 IC ours 01 ammo MVO= OS mot• VALVOSED NOW P1158NO0411K •7••41111•49) CO MOMS =CR TIP PON WORD OW TO 40111 PK IMO WWI OR MOW. 1.114161 DismE nicONG WILE SOUTH ELEVATION 10 Pass • Pi 1.'• // `••, // Vi---=----- - //\,....:\ 7 ..Z.. .Z.7..,===." \ \IT../L.EL.-.1:-..i..1 '.• /1 .:‘,••••, , cwiiii. le', sit ,,•,'''''' `, 7, •, _ cus eux.0001 jill•N•010 MEOW CMOS CI 1. Torn FOLIAAOIT 202 /10 01[00 SOUTH EQUIPMENT ELEVATION • F 0"Si:tint *WPCS. 4002 MAW DOM sum too nusurtaft Cl SISDS (MEM' 08101491138. XAMERICAN STORAGE 8034XC76213 OM PAESI DOM STREEr RADOM CITY. CA. SISSO SAN IMO COUNTY MEW ISSUE SAW 3/23/01 ZONING 9/...200AIE050ED F058ly- 3 3/23/131 3/17/01 KIASED DE91.0/1001 PORI X0/1044 COO COO 3/0/01 2ORNO/DOS CDO 02/13/01 PEASP.SILIP( COG POE PUNTS (illit] TETRA TECH IMO ‘17.146.1 1.0.• k44411 g0-11763. FM (042) 200-•7711 TAM RECEIVED MAR 2 6 2001 BY. PAWN SY --p--=CHIC.—APV DRAWN BY: LIAS I PAS I COO 0045) TRIP ELEVATIONS GET HUMBER ,1333 C4 3 PCOSPASCI1 S 1.1101.010 =ass 1/020. ItUOI CO WOMB (Ma WOW/ SMAir .016 wrs..19 CI) 81.10)/r50:1011 mum mum PPM TO MO4 IV NAM 11=16 83 WEST ELEVATION A FIRM OM A1110014.- 03 0.90.9N Iwo= miff PIM MOM% ....eregg4 ej. OIL I • g 1 4rsptint. gpingp009 .223 MOOT SMAIONa *00 222.12.00*4 CA 2 A.AmEmcAs STORAGE $D30076213 525 *8502 22211 STREET' NATION& CITY, CA. 91250 SAN DEGO COUNTY 3/23/01 ZONING 3/23/01 3/17/01 3/0/01 132/12/01 039320 201991/1 201910/I000 ZONING/202 FFJOBILOY COG COG CDC TETRA TECH 17710AIMT—Mt""° auc 01411) .100-87711 filed. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE September 4, 2001 AGENDA ITEM NO. 24 (-ITEM TITLE NOTICE OF DECISION - VARIANCE FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING WITH LESS THAN REQUIRED PARKING AND PROJECTIONS INTO THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD IN THE 1400 BLOCK OF HIGHLAND AVENUE (APPLICANT: KATHRYN WILLETS FOR PAUL AGPAOA AND THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION) (CASE FILE NO.: Z-2001-10) PREPARED Y Jon CainDEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The project site is a vacant, 15,984 square foot parcel on the west side of Highland Avenue, approximately 100 feet south of E. 14th Street. The property is in the General Commercial (CG) zone. A variance approved for this site in 1998 allowed a medical building with two fewer parking spaces than required by Code. Building Permits were never approved for the project and the variance expired. The current applicant proposes to construct a two-story, 6,000 square foot office building. Maniflo, which is primarily a money transfer business, will use the office as its primary processing center. The building design includes two balconies and a deck on the upper floor, substantial variation in wall plane, a varied roof line, numerous windows, and other desirable architectural features in compliance with Design Guidelines. A variance is again requested for two fewer parking spaces than required by Code. It would allow 27 parking spaces rather than the 29 required, and would also permit a wood trellis and vertical cloth awnings in the front of the building to project 5 and 3'/2 feet into the required 10-foot front yard setback. At the Planning Commission public hearing for the project, Commissioners questioned the request for a variance on vacant property. The attached letter was received in opposition to the variance. The Commission continued the hearing and asked the applicant to redesign the project to comply with parking requirements. The applicant met with staff but was unable to find an alternative that met parking requirements and satisfied the floor area needs for the business. The Commission approved the project after the second hearing, based on anticipated benefit from the project in revitalizing the area and in consideration of other nearby properties that do not comply with current Code standards. Environmental Review X WACategorical Exemption Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission recommends that the Notice of Decision be 64Z.- %7-(4-7 The Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the street vacation. Vote: Ayes - Flores, Ungab, Baca, Reynolds Nays - Valderrama sen arra ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1 Planning Commission Resolution no. 27-2001 2. Location Map 3. Applicant's Plans A-200 (9/80) Resolution No. 4. Letter from nearby property owner RESOLUTION NO.27-2001 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A ZONE VARIANCE FOR AN OFFICE BUILDING WITH LESS THAN REQUIRED PARKING AND PROJECTIONS INTO THE REQUIRED FRONT YARD IN THE 1400 BLOCK OF HIGHLAND AVENUE APPLICANT: KATHRYN WILLETS FOR PAUL AGPAOA AND THE NATIONAL CITY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CASE FILE NO. Z-2001-10 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Zone Variance application for an office building with less than required parking and projections into the required front yard in the 1400 block of Highland Avenue at a duly advertised public hearing held on Jiily2, 2001, and continued to the meeting of August 6, 2001 at which times oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. Z-2001-10 which is maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearings; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearings held on July 2, and August 6, 2001, support the following findings: 1. That because of special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of Title 18 of the Municipal Code (Zoning) deprives such property of privileges enjoyed by other property in the vicinity and under the identical zone classification, since the property is too small to provide two additional parking spaces for the proposed project and since other properties in the area have similar architectural projections and do not comply with parking lot or other Code standards. 2. That the requested variance is subject to such conditions which will assure that the adjustment authorized will not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone in which such property is situated, since conditions will require the development to comply with approved plans, and since the variance is needed for a proposed redevelopment project that is anticipated to stimulate additional investment in the area. 3. That the variance does not authorize a use or activity which is not otherwise expressly authorized by the zoning regulations governing the parcel of property, since the proposed office use is permitted by the CG General Commercial zoning applicable to the property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Zone Variance is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This Zone Variance authorizes architectural projections into the front yard setback and 27 parking spaces rather than the 29 spaces otherwise required. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibit A, case file no. Z-2001-10, dated 5/23/01. 2. Plans submitted with any application for a building permit must comply with the 1998 California Building, Plumbing, Electrical, and Mechanical Codes and the California Title 24 handicapped and energy regulations. 3. Two exits from the second story shall be provided if the occupancy load exceeds 10. 4. A grading plan shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer showing all of the proposed and existing on- and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and shall be in accordance with the City's standard requirements. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system form the proposed parking lot and development shall be implemented with the design of the grading plan. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins shall be undertaken in accordance with the NPDES regulations. 5. All surface run-off shall be collected by approved drainage facilities and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface run-off resulting from this project. 6. The property owner, or its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for the maintenance, repair, or reconstruction of all irrigation and landscaping improvements installed within the public right-of-way. Sprinkler heads shall be adjusted so as to prevent overspray upon the public sidewalk or street. The proposed, sprinkler heads shall be installed behind the sidewalk, and the irrigation mainline upon private property only, as required by the City. The property owner, or its successors and assigns, shall remove and relocate all irrigation items from the public right-of-way at no cost to the City, and within a reasonable time frame upon a written notification by the City Engineer. 7. For PCV irrigation lines in the public right-of-way, a metallic identification tape shall be placed between the bottom layer of the finished surface and the top of the lines. 8. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the review and approval of the City Engineer. The report shall address the stability of all existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure, and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. At a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2-inch A.C. over 4-inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with Standard Drawing G-24 with National City modifications. All soils report findings shall be part of the Engineering Department requirements. 9. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6-inch in size with a clean -out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 10. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements (20 feet of sidewalk) along the property frontage shall be removed and replaced as specified by the City k Engineer. 11. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, they shall be restored by a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be filed with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents filed shall be given to the National City Engineering Department. 12. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and the grading construction on private property. 13. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for the proposed grading, drainage, street improvement, and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. This deposit is subject to adjustment. 14. All missing street improvements, including abandoned driveway aprons (30 feet of driveway), shall be replaced with curb, gutter, and sidewalks. All street improvements shall be in accordance with City standards. 15. Fire department access shall be maintained at all times during construction. 16. A trash enclosure shall be provided in accordance with City standards. It shall have a stucco exterior to match the building. 17. Exterior walls of buildings/ freestanding signs/ trash enclosures to a height of not less than 6 feet shall be treated with "Graffiti Melt Coating" manufactured by Genesis Coatings, Inc. A similar product may be used, subject to approval from the Building and Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its observance. 18. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan, including plant types, methods of planting, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant planting and water conserving irrigation devices. 19. Before this Zone Variance shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Zone Variance. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Zone Variance are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 20. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within (one year) after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day, following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unles an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CER1'11,ICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of August 20, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Flores, Ungab, Baca, Reynolds NAYS: Valderrama ABSENT: Parra ABSTAIN: Detzer PROJECT LOCATION PROPOSED BUILDING LOCATION MAP ZONE BOUNDARY 1428 Highland Avenue Z-2001-10 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 6/20/01 INITIAL HEARING: 7/2/01 SCMEV tlV'FE NO A1E WMt. 195'-o• COMPACT 3I'-Zt" 16911EEL�LE11COM mil ELE MC& not WM n 511T FLAN - OOF r,AN W CIE t SNEWILU NEW OSIVEWAY MANIWI.O INC. OIPRA11ONS al\K ; APPLICANT, DM KPWIA 11tAII0166 MYMY, CMGDIN MOW 0619.615d54/ LEGAL PE5CKIPTION: APO0210f 6E VA5t01L WV 10K1E5G l01w61 014YILE •LLMYN'S1 OF 09001i tA'4M M 0) 9.1(III Cr NAOMI& CIM1. COIMI Of SMOLW. SIAR M CKE0R01 6CCOEOWO10 %I MN MRC6 NO !b6 1LEV INK MCI W 11t (UNr(ft(LMK IMY II. I[69 MN 560'1 1 Ob t %0'INl 01 Mir 4000*9 1426101MM AYLNL. µVO4* CIIY. CN 111W 91950 VICINITY MAP PEOJECT DATA: 11/1011GMA - 51. 4111M 6VAWIuu9UrcN5 • 79+1 11M.1 WV, A • I215 LLARYKE6•M5 1CR5fOrr TK15 • 06 lOrM • bWO 51 AR Mtn - 15964 'LOUR NIAlM10 • f15Y COMECONN IW1'I•N OCCWAMCY Cr1Cf PMING iwn9V -2 I.ONrKl • 6 51MMN9 • 19 IOTA • T1't'K15 110I tOF wA• 1.n6 0E 1610M! 1 gq/nY.: %Api METAL 0/J.COW MINI0 Di LI r El ri n 0 a MOM Intl 15 , LIIL 1 araccotv'oosnxave r 011,t COPING 7 INIEV COMO 1E0 M11/1, 000F M1M41! —1 EB 0 El A51" 1,t1/A1iON-F1201\11 C I • -• 0' 0 0 Cf.CK I a I • ...•••••0 :1" 0;17 (444,0T,4 144:1C4 4V41,454.0" C 071010W 101F0E15C El. El E aksstacoa vs,/ WAY 4 ICA 11 'NAT I 474701 1, 1100f ;EWE !TOP Of FLOOR il,FAXMICE M51" l.\/A1-101\1IAI - RILY1StONS •• 0 , g 5,I6Veao+x vwNaks W000 1RELL15 4 5OVER6,12 tl 111220 NS S COLORED COCONCRER 61.061. MINN5 ❑ ❑ ❑ Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ DODD Q155 ROCKS NOt;11.1 5It2 rI� rsNRr, cmuonrEG Nerti E006 LI Ex15TIN6 SI;E WALL I/4" • 1...011 COED 60L051YLENE ROAD COPLNO SAW P.g5511620 EN, 661.6616 FPAWEf I,EYONG Rx114EG C C01.01i2G C0I71•R R.I.Oct WAI1•15601 C '; 50Ufd L VA110N- 5Ibn 1/4" • -0" 56ONn F1.00t PLAN 1/8• • P-0• �1�5r �1.00tz rLAN I/8" • P-0" (VIYEVITn C19LFlN8 µ50VE REVISIONS RV nn. MS Iri PETERSON PROPERTIES Ernie Peterson 3722 Liggett Drive San Diego, CA 92106 (619) 226-4663 City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950 Re: Case File Z- 2001-10 Dear Sirs, 6-30-01 As owners of the property at 1300 —1320 Highland Avenue, we object to the proposed variance reducing the parking required at this location. We are currently having a problem with cars from the apartments located west of 1406 Highland Avenue. The builders should realize that sufficient parking increases the value of a property. Sincerely, Ernest Peterson RGEC REGIONAL GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY COMMISSION The agency would have all of the powers, duties, rights, and obligations of all of: ➢ San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) > San Diego Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) > North San Diego County Transit Development Board (NSDCTDB) ITEM #25 9/4/01 A Board of Directors consisting of 11 members would govern the agency as follows: > Eight (8) members would be elected from districts throughout the County; > Three (3) additional members would serve from the following: 1. The Mayor of the City of San Diego, 2. A member of the County Board of Supervisors, 3. The Chair of the Agency's Policy Committee, (The chairperson of the Policy Committee shall not be from the City of San Diego or the County of San Diego, but a mayor (or designee) from one of the other 17 cities within the county. Policy Committee consists of mayors of all cities, a member of the Board of Supervisors, representation from the unincorporated areas of the County of San Diego, and other regional organizations to indude: Caltrans, San Diego County Water Authority, the Unified Port District, San Diego County Office of Education, and the Airport Authority (if created). Representation shall also be invited from U.S. Department of Defense, Republic of Mexico, and others as subsequently determined by the Board of the Regional Agency) > Each elected member would receive a salary equal County Supervisors. Mayors, Supervisors, and Policy Committee would receive per -diem commensurate with their responsibilities. ➢ Elected members would serve 4 year, staggered terms. > The County Board of Supervisors shall not appoint their representative to the governing board of the Regional Agency from the same overlapping jurisdiction as that of the chairperson of the Policy Committee, or from a district that is predominantly within the boundaries of the City of San Diego. ➢ The Regional Agency shall have at a minimum of a Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel, Chief Financial Officer, Director of Real Estate, Budget Director; and Planning Director. The agency would have all rights and powers necessary to carry out the following: > Acquire all real and personal property necessary for the provision of transit services within the region by gift, lease, purchase, or the exercise of eminent domain. > Enact ordinances and adopt rules and regulations as necessary to carry out its responsibilities. > Provide oversight to MTDB and NCTD as the sub -regional transit boards. Sub -regional boards would plan schedules, routes, etc within their respective areas. Land Use: land -use decisions on a regional basis shall be policy driven, with local cities and the County maintaining local control through adopted sub -regional plans. The cities and County shall be able to self -certify as to compliance with an adopted Regional Plan, and would implement their own sub -regional focus plans consistent with the Regional Plan subject to review by the Regional Agency. The Regional Agency shall have the ability to use the power of eminent domain in order to facilitate implementation of regionally significant projects. SANDAG NCTD MTDB REGIONAL AGENCY Three Agencies One Agency Consolidation Plan The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), and its successor the Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21), explicitly recognized the inseparable linkages among transportation planning, air quality, and land use policies. While the Federal Highway Administration developed clear guidelines and regulations with regard to air quality planning and its linkage to transportation planning, it left the integration of land use policies with transportation planning to local government policy makers. In recognizing the potential gains from consolidating and coordinating our regional transportation and land -use planning and implementation efforts, the Commission recommends that: A Regional Agency, shall be created by statute for the San Diego County Region to plan regional transportation facilities and services, to adopt a regional land -use plan, and to ensure conformity to the plan. It is intended that the regional agency shall become the Metropolitan Planning Organization for the San Diego Region. 26 The Regional Agency Governance A. The Regional Agency shall consist of representatives from 8 districts within San Diego County. Each of these districts shall elect a representative to sit on the board of the Regional Agency. Three additional members shall also sit on the Agency Board. These include: the Mayor of the City of San Diego, a Supervisor from the County of San Diego, and the chairperson of the Policy Committee of the Agency. In addition, the Agency will have a Policy Committee, which shall be made up of mayors (or designee) from the 18 incorporated cities2 within the County, a County supervisor, representation from the unincorporated areas of the County of San Diego, and other regional organizations to include: Caltrans, San Diego County Water Authority, the Unified Port District, San Diego County Office of Education, and the Airport Authority (if created). Representation shall also be invited from U.S. Department of Defense, Republic of Mexico, and others as subsequently determined by the Board of the Regional Agency. Each of the 8 elected Board members shall serve full time and be compensated at a level commensurate with that of a San Diego County Supervisor. The term of office for the directly elected board members shall be four years and staggered. The Mayor of San Diego, the County Supervisor, and 2 Consisting of the cities of Carlsbad, Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, El Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa, Lemon Grove, National City, Oceanside, Poway, San Diego, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, Vista 27 The Chair of the Policy Committee shall receive Per Diem commensurate with their responsibilities. B. The Regional Agency shall have at a minimum: 1. A Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel, Chief Financial Officer, Director of Real Estate, Budget Director, and Planning Director, and 2. The powers of eminent domain, land use, bonding authority, contractual (including construction) and operating authorities as outlined under Sections II and III below. C. An independent audit shall determine the most cost-effective way to consolidate the planning staffs and integrate the authorities of SANDAG, MTDB, and NCTD with the goal of at least a cost neutral result from the creation of the Regional Agency. D. Until such time as the Regional Agency adopts its own campaign and disclosure laws, it shall abide by those adopted by the County of San Diego. E. The chairperson of the Policy Committee shall not be from the City of San Diego or the County of San Diego, but a mayor (or designee) from one of the other 17 cities within the county. F. The County Board of Supervisors shall not appoint their representative to the governing board of the Regional Agency from the same overlapping jurisdiction as that of the chairperson of the Policy Committee, or from a district that is predominantly within the boundaries of the City of San Diego. G. The chairperson of the Policy Committee shall be elected by the members of the committee for a term of 2 years. 28 H. The eight districts shall be drawn by an independent, commission representing the following: 1. Three members from the City ofSan Diego 2. Two members from the County of San Diego 3. One member each from the four sub -regions of: a. North County Coastal consisting of the cities of Del Mar, Solana Beach, Encinitas, Carlsbad, and Oceanside b. North County Inland consisting of the cities of Vista, San Marcos, Escondido, and Poway c. East County consisting of the cities of La Mesa, Lemon Grove, El Cajon, and Santee d. South County consisting of the cities of Chula Vista, Coronado, National City, and Imperial Beach Redrawing of districts shall take place subsequent to each decennial census, as needed. J. The City Selection Committee process shall be used to determine the representatives from each of the four above -mentioned sub -regions. K. The decisions of the governing board of the Regional Agency shall be final in all matters under its jurisdiction. L. Duties of the Policy Committee: 1. The duties of the Policy Committee could include, but not be limited to, providing consultation and advice to the Agency on: a. The Regional Plan b. Possible inclusion in the Regional Plan of other growth management and land use planning matters, determined by the 29 Agency to be of regional concern/significance, which will benefit from regional planning, other than those specifically identified through legislation c. Amendments to the Regional Plan, and d. Possible future consolidation and/ or integration of regional functions into the jurisdiction of the Regional Agency. II. Roles and Responsibilities of the Agency A. The following is a summary of the major functions and responsibilities of SANDAG. While it is the intent of RGEC that the new Regional Agency shall assume all functions and responsibilities of SANDAG, not all these functions are under the purview or subject to the authority of the state: 1. Planning a. Regional Transportation planning and funding allocation agency — Adopt Regional Transportation Plan (long range plan) and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (six year programming of approximately $3.5 billion (98 RTIP) state and federal transportation funds). Allocate Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds (1/4 cent sales tax for transit support, approximately $84 million per year). b. Metropolitan Planning Organization— Allocate federal transportation revenues and meet comprehensive planning requirements of the Act (TEA-21) in order to be eligible for funds. Over $100 million a year directly allocated by SANDAG. 30 c. San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission — Administer the TransNet 'V2 cent sales tax (approximately $166 million per year) for transportation purposes. Please Refer to Section (VI.A.4) d. Congestion Management Agency— Adopt congestion management plan and review local agency compliance. e. Co -lead Agency for Air Quality Planning— Carry out air quality planning mandates in cooperation with the APCD. Determine conformity of transportation projects with air quality plan. f. Regional Planning and Growth Management Review Board— Develop and adopt regional growth management strategy. g. Integrated Waste Management Task Force— Recommend actions to member agencies regarding the major elements of the state -mandated Integrated Waste Management Plan. h. Housing— Determine each locality's share for the regional housing need and establish performance criteria for self -certification of housing element. i. Areawide Clearinghouse— Review projects with regional impacts under CEQA and NEPA. j. Manage and administer the North County Multiple Habitat Conservation Program— Undertaken on behalf of North County Cities. k. Airport Related Land Use —Adopt Comprehensive Land Use Plans (CLUP) for all airports in the region, and determine consistency of local land use actions with the plans. 1. Other— Regional Criminal Justice Clearinghouse, Regional Census Data Center, Regional Information Systems development and maintenance, 31 local planning activities pursuant to agreements with Navy, Caltrans, Governor's Office of Planning and Research, MTDB, NCTDB, APCD, CWA, cities and the County, and others; local technical assistance, and SourcePoint. 2. Operational a. San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission— Construct sales tax highway projects. b. Toll Bridge Administration— Set San Diego -Coronado Bridge tolls and allocate toll revenues, if collected, which are currently approximately $3.4 million per year. c. Freeway Service Patrol Administration— Provide service for stranded motorists on various highways. d. Regional Transportation Demand Management Program Administration — Provide and administer regional program consisting of carpool (RideLink) and vanpool programs, bike locker program and others. e. I-15 Congestion Pricing and Transit Development Demonstration program— Implement program to allow single occupant vehicles on 1-15 expressway for a fee. f. Regional Power Purchasing Pool Administration— Administer pool for purchase of electricity by public agencies. g. Regional Beach Replenishment Program— Administer the regional program in coordination with federal, state, and local agencies. B. In addition, the Regional Agency shall have all planning responsibilities of the two sub - regional transit agencies. However, MTDB and NCTD shall continue their transit operations. 32 C. Tribal Governments The Regional Agency Board shall establish protocols, procedures, and a liaison office dedicated to establishing consistent communication with the region's 17 tribal governments regarding local planning and economic development issues of mutual interest. The Board should seek to schedule regular periodic (bi-annual or quarterly) meetings with representatives of the 17 tribal governments to sustain ongoing communication on a government -to -government basis. Legislation should require that all Tribal Governments in the County receive notice of all planning proposals and meetings of the Regional Agency and its Policy Committee of local agencies and the Regional Agency Board should be required to acknowledge planning spheres of influence in areas adjacent to each reservation. Prior to the final hearing on the Regional Plan and any subsequent amendments thereto, all tribal governments shall be asked to comment on the Plan, and invited to share their plans for economic development on reservation lands. Any needs for infrastructure to support those plans, such as water, sewer, and transportation links, shall be considered in the regional planning process. 33 III. Land -Use Responsibilities of the Agency Recognizing the significance of the integration of land -use policies and transportation planning, and with the intent of addressing this deficiency in our transportation planning efforts in the San Diego Region, the Commission recommends that the following measures with regard to land use be adopted in their entirety by the California State Legislature. The recommendation to adopt these measures in their entirety is based on our strong belief that selection of some individual elements without the others will render this needed integration ineffective and will become a source of future problems created by a well-intentioned solution. With this strongly held belief, the San Diego Regional Government Efficiency Commission recommends to the California State Legislature that: A. The functional goals, policies, and activities of the newly created agency shall be driven by the following principles: 1. The San Diego Region needs a Regional Plan and, by adopting a comprehensive regional plan, good land -use planning and environmental protection would be significantly improved in the region. This Regional Plan shall include transportation3, land use, water and sewer capacity, preservation of habitat and open space, housing, compatible urban design and urban form, and major infrastructure needs. The Regional Plan shall be compatible with the Air Pollution Control District's Regional Air Quality Strategy for air quality issues. The Regional Plan shall also be compatible with the Regional Water Quality Control Board's Basin Plan for water quality, bay and watershed management issues. 3 Defined as a seamless intermodal integrated transportation system 34 2. The Regional Plan shall reflect a regional comprehensive approach to planning, with an emphasis on wide variety of balanced and attainable housing options, open space preservation, economic prosperity, employment development, public infrastructure and transportation planning. 3. Implementation of the plan shall be phased so that there is minimal disruption of services to the public. 4. Land -use decisions on a regional basis shall be policy driven, with local cities and the County maintaining local control through adopted sub -regional plans. 5. The cities and County shall be able to self -certify as to compliance with an adopted Regional Plan, and would implement their own sub -regional focus plans consistent with the Regional Plan subject to review by the Regional Agency. The Regional Agency shall have the ability to use the power of eminent domain in order to facilitate implementation of regionally significant projects. 6. The Regional Agency shall serve as a coordinating body for habitat conservation planning and implementation. B. We further recommend the following guidelines for implementation: 1. The regional policy plan shall set specific quality of life goals, guidelines for the achievement of goals and objectives, and measurable criteria to determine compliance and effectiveness. 2. The Regional Plan shall not include any specific land use designations or regulatory techniques; those functions would be the responsibility of each local agency. 3. Documents currently in place including but not limited to the adopted habitat plans (MSCP, MHCP, etc.); Region 2020 and Region 2030 plans and their constituent elements including the Regional Transportation Plan, Regional 35 Housing Needs Statement, the Economic Prosperity Study; and the transportation plans including Transit First and Fast Forward, shall be used as the framework for the draft Regional Plan. 4. Consistency with an adopted Regional Plan shall be a requirement for a jurisdiction/agency to receive funding. In other words, the "carrot" for being in compliance with the Regional Plan is that a city or the County would be eligible for project funding; those who choose not to comply with the adopted Regional Plan would have to develop their own funding for local projects. 5. Disincentives to ensure local compliance for projects of regional significance shall be used in well-defined and limited contexts but could include: 1) withholding discretionary funding sources, 2) requirements for regional oversight of local land use decisions regarding projects of regional significance; and 3) withholding a structured local/state sales and property tax sharing arrangement that would be part of the Regional Plan. 6. A "balanced carrying capacity's shall be factored into a growth management strategy to promote economic prosperity in the region. The Regional Plan shall be "resource-based"5 with measurable criteria6 for implementation, and it shall be specifically connected to a funding stream such that it would then be used as an incentive for compliance. 4 Balanced Carrying Capacity: Defined as the balance or relationship between the various components that comprise our regional system, including quality of life. A balanced carrying capacity does not imply that there is an upper population limit that our region can support, but rather that there is a direct relationship between people, infrastructure, developed land, open space, economy, economic base, recreation and natural resources. For example, a higher human population may be supported if there is an associated increase in infrastructure and recreation. However, certain finite components, such as natural open space and habitat, cannot be increased and must be factored into the balance equation. 5 Resource -based: Consumables such as water, electricity, natural gas, landfills, plus land use issues such as open space preservation, roads and highways, transit, etc. 6 Measurable Criteria: The criteria developed should be both qualitative and quantitative. The criteria should be policy - based and derived from the adopted Regional Plan by an elected board that is accountable for implementing the regional plan. Evaluation of the criteria would be flexible within the context of the goals, objectives and policies of the Regional Plan and other relevant plans and policies. 36 7. A proposed Regional Plan shall be presented to the public so that the "vision" of where the region is heading is clearly identified at the earliest possible date. 8. The focus shall not be upon a Regional Plan for a specific year or population number, but rather upon a balanced carrying capacity and resource -based strategy that sets standards and guidelines that are measurable. 9. Efforts shall be made to amend CEQA to be more responsive to regional decision - making, rather than on a project -by -project approval basis. 10. The Regional Agency shall develop a mechanism for mediation and resolution of disputes on regional issues. IV. Transportation -Related Responsibilities of the Agency The Regional Agency shall have the authority to: A. Prepare a long-range, multi -modal regional transportation and land -use plan. B. Implement the Regional Transportation Plan, and, in doing so, the Regional Agency shall be responsible for overseeing regional transportation services, including: 1. Planning and programming existing and future services throughout the region, including bus, light rail, Passenger and freight rail services, guideway, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements, and other specialized transportation services. 2. Establishing a common and seamless fare structure for all services between the sub -areas of the region. 3. Establishing expenditure priorities and programming of funds for both transit services and capital outlay, including new maintenance facilities, passenger and freight rail improvements, light rail transit (LRT) extensions, and other similar capital expenditures within the region. 37 4. Designing and constructing transit capital projects. 5. Ensuring that there is a regional marketing program and information services for all transit services in the region. C. Acquire all real and personal property necessary for the provision of transit services within the region by gift,lease, purchase, or the exercise of eminent domain. D. Enact ordinances and adopt rules and regulations as necessary to carry out its responsibilities. E. Provide oversight to MTDB, and NCTD as the sub -regional transit boards. V. Responsibilities of the Sub -regional Transportation Agencies The sub -regional transit boards (NCTD and MTDB) shall continue to exist and have the authority to: A. Deploy transit vehicles in accordance with the routes and schedules established by the Regional Agency. B. Determine routes and schedules for rail, bus, ADA, and specialized transportation services within the area of the sub -regional boards consistent with the region's overall financial capacity and the Regional Agency's transportation plan as established by the Regional Agency. The sub -regional boards may provide such services directly or by contract. C. Continue the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS) as the multiple operator system of transit services in the MTDB area of jurisdiction. MTDB may continue as the regulating agency for taxis and other vehicles for hire by contract with municipalities. The County Rural Transit Service may be combined into MTS or be operated separately by the County at the discretion of the County and MTDB. D. Continue NCTD as the operator of services within the NCTD area of jurisdiction. 38 E. Provide specialized marketing services in their own respective sub -regional areas. VI. Funding of the Regional Agency Dedicated state and regional funding sources must be identified for basic and regionally significant infrastructure improvements such as water and sewer services, solid waste management, air capacity, maritime services, open space acquisition and management and maintenance, and ground transportation including mass transit. The legislature has directed San Diego, through SB 329, to explore options for regional coordination and consolidation for more efficiency and effectiveness at the regional level. Assembly Speaker, Robert Hertzberg, during the same period, has formed a Commission on Regionalism to address the dire need for local government reform to meet the challenges of the next millennium. In light of these legislative initiatives to explore solutions, and encourage local governments to think regionally, and if the San Diego region is to take this groundbreaking initiative and form a Regional Agency to improve efficiency and effectiveness of its regional programs, the state should, at the very least, revise the applicable formula so that San Diego general purpose local Governments and the Regional Agency may receive the state average of 47 cents return on property tax dollars paid. Currently, San Diego general purpose local governments only receive 38 cents back on each property tax dollar paid by the citizens of the region. The additional revenue would be dedicated to transportation capacity enhancement and environmental protection programs in the region, with minimal administrative costs. These actions, coupled with fiscal reform recommendations detailed in the reports by SANDAG and the Speaker's Commission on fiscal reform, (please refer to the appendix) will allow the San Diego region to be a "winner in the New Economy," as envisioned by the Speaker. 39 In managing its finances, the Regional Agency shall: A. Prepare a Regional Transportation Financial Plan that would implement the Regional Transportation Plan by: 1. Using existing state and federal financial resources and existing and enhanced state resources received by the Regional Agency as incentives to ensure that local land use plans and transportation investments by the cities, the county, MTDB, NCTD and Caltrans conform to the plan and its program of transportation investments. 2 t Managing transportation revenues to ensure conformity with the regional land use and transportation plan. Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds will continue to be distributed on a population basis to the sub -regions of the Regional Agency. 3. Assuming all the powers and responsibilities of SANDAG sitting as the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission administering the TransNet (Proposition A) sales tax measure as adopted by the voters of San Diego County in November 1987. 4. Continuing to apply the current formula for distribution to cities and the County of the local streets and roads portion of the TransNet revenue through the term of the ballot measure until it expires in 2008. Both, a two-thirds majority vote of the Policy Committee, and a two-thirds majority vote of the governing board of the Regional Agency shall be required for any changes to the existing formula in force. 5. Ensuring that in the event title to real or personal property assets of the sub - regional agencies (NCTD or MTDB) are transferred to the Regional Agency, and the Regional Agency sells such assets, the proceeds of such sale shall be used by 40 the Regional Agency to fund services or capital programs within the area of the sub -region from which the assets are acquired. In the event such assets are sold by the sub -regional agency, the proceeds shall remain with the sub -regional agency for use in funding its services or capital program. 6. Exercising the authority to require the reservation or dedication of property necessary for the development of regional facilities in the same manner as cities, so long as such regional facilities have been identified in the long-range multi- modal regional transportation and land use plan adopted by the Regional Agency. 7. Managing the region's transportation financial resources, and being the grantee for federal and state transit funds. 8. Overseeing the finances of all transit services, including preparing revenue and cost forecasts, approving annual budgets and pursuing capital grants. 41 SB 865 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis http://info.sen.cagov/pub/bill/sen/sb_...b_865_cfa_20010702_ 104435_asm_comm.hnnl Item #26 9/4/01 SB 865 Date of Hearing: July 3, 2001 Page 1 ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON JOBS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND THE ECONOMY Sarah Reyes, Chair SB 865 (Polanco) - As Amended: June 27, 2001 SENATE VOTE 25-9 SUBJECT California and Mexico Border Infrastructure Financing Authority. SUMMARY Establishes the California and Mexico Border Infrastructure Financing Authority (CMBIFA) to provide revenue bond, financing for construction and improvement of public and private infrastructure projects along the California -Mexico border. Specifically, this bill . 1)Creates the CMBIFA consisting of: a) Two members appointed by the Governor, subject to Senate confirmation, knowledgeable in border issues and experienced in economic development and finance matters. a) Two members appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules. a) Two members appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly. a) A member of a city council located within the County of Imperial, who shall be appointed by the Governor. a) A member of the San Diego County Board of Supervisors, appointed by the board. a) A member of the Imperial County Board of Supervisors, appointed by the board. a) A member of the San Diego City Council, appointed by the Governor. a) A member of a community -based organization, appointed by the Governor, involved in border trade and development projects. 1)Stipulates the following regarding appointees: SB 865 Page 2 a) Two initial appointees by the Governor shall serve four-year terms and two other initial appointees by the 1 of 6 08/02/2001 3:54 Ply SB 865 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bilVsen/sb_...b_865 cfa 20010702_104435_asm comm.hanl Governor shall serve two-year terms. a) One initial appointee each by the Senate Committee on Rules and the Speaker of the Assembly shall serve a four-year term. The other initial appointees by the Senate Committee on Rules and the Speaker of "the Assembly shall serve two-year terms. a) All other appointees shall serve three-year terms. a) All appointees shall serve without compensation. 1)Requires the State Treasurer to designate an advisory committee composed of not less than four residents of Mexico and to convene the first meeting of the CMBIFA. 2)Grants CMBIFA the authority to do all of the following: a) Maintain an office in this state. a), Hire employees. a) Adopt bylaws and regulations. a) Enter into agreements essential to the execution of its duties and powers. a) Coordinate projects with federal and local entities and the governments of Mexico. a) Charge fees commensurate with its direct expenses, accept public/private grants or other aid or contributions, and borrow any moneys that may be necessary for the initial organization and operation of the authority. a) Assist local governments with planning, revenue preparation, marketing, sale, and documentation of industrial revenue bonds. a) Collect and maintain financial, economic, governmental, credit, and social data relevant to the local administration of industrial revenue bonds and to the improvement of the local market for debt issues. SB 865 Page 3 a) Undertake or commission studies to reduce the costs of state and local debt issues. a) Recommend relevant changes in state law and local practices. 1)Grants the chairperson of the CMBIFA the authority to appoint an executive director who shall serve at the pleasure of the authority and receive a salary established by the chairperson. _rc 08/02/2001 3:54 Plv SB 865 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_ ..b_865_cfa_20010702_I04435_asm_comm.html 2)Authorizes the CMBIFA to issue revenue bonds upon a two-thirds vote of its membership, with the concurrence of the State Treasurer. 3)States that no bond issued by the Authority would become a lien or liability against the State of California. 4)Creates the Infrastructure Development Fund for purposes of depositing fees and appropriations. 5)Requires CMBIFA, in consultation with public and private entities, to identify needs and priorities related to border economic development and environmental quality, and to develop, by August 1, 2002, a draft master plan for implementation of strategies to address these needs. 6)Requires CMBIFA to adopt a final master plan of projects to be constructed on a priority basis based on the draft master plan. Requires CMBIFA, prior to adopting the master plan, to hold public hearings and distribute copies of the proposed master plan to local entities in the border region and to interested federal and state agencies. 7)Limits projects in the CMBIFA master plan to public works projects intended to strengthen the infrastructure of the area and to the following revenue -generating projects: a) Economic and business development supporting, directly or indirectly, trade alliances between California and Mexico. a) Telecommunications. a) Transportation. SB 865 Page 4 a) Environmental mitigation and improvement. a) Sewage and water facilities. a) Co -generation or energy -producing facilities. 1)Allows the following entities to submit proposals to the authority: a) City councils in the counties of Imperial and San Diego. a) The board of supervisors from the counties of Imperial and San Diego. a) The municipalities of Mexicali, Tecate, and Tijuana. a) Private sector alliances, public -private sector alliances, or other appropriate Mexican authorities. 3 of 6 08/02/2001 3:54 PM SB 865 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis http://infosen.cagov/pub/bill/sen/sb_..b_865_cfa_20010702_104435_asm_comm.html 1)Stipulates that all projects adopted in the master plan must be consistent with all local general plans and ordinances, regional plans and requirements and state plans and requirements. 2)Requires CMBIFA to submit, by December 31, 2002 and annually thereafter, a status report to the Legislature and Governor on all related projects and initiatives underway on either side of the border. 3)Requires CMBIFA to report, no later than January 1, 2005 and biennially.therafter, to the Governors of California and Baja California and the Legislature regarding authority business. EXISTING LAW 1)Provides for various boards and authorities within the State Treasurer's Office that are authorized to issue debt for specific. purposes as permitted by law. These authorities include the California Pollution Control Financing Authority, the California Urban Waterfront Area Restoration Financing ,Authority, the California School Finance Authority, the California Alternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority, the California Educational Facilities Authority, and the California Health Facilities Financing Authority. SB 865 Page 5 2)Establishes the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to promote economic revitalization, enable future development, and provide low -interest loans to public entities. 3)Establishes the Office of California -Mexico Affairs and the Commission of the Californias to develop economic, educational, and cultural relations with the State of Baja California, the State of Baja California Sur, and other states and territories of the Republic of Mexico. FISCAL EFFECT Unknown. COMMENTS According to the author, "Due to anticipated population growth along the CA/Mexico border, without intervention, escalating infrastructure needs will go unmet. This will negatively impact economic competitiveness in the border region." The author also cites severe unemployment in the region: "Imperial County has a 26.3% jobless rate. Industrial growth in Mexicali offers hope for economic growth for Imperial if appropriate incentives are in place." The California Industrial Development Financing Act allows local entities to form a financing authority and, with concurrence from the State Treasurer, to issue revenue bonds, typically where private or concessionary financing is unavailable. The Act authorizes the California Industrial Development Financing • of 6 no /n, ,flnn. SB 865 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis http://info.sen.ea.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_...b_865_cfa 20010702_104435_asm_comm.htm1 Advisory Commission to provide technical assistance to city and county authorities that issue industrial development bonds. This bill would mandate the creation of a financing authority along the California -Mexico border. The duties of the CMBIFA would be similar to those of the North American Development Bank and the Border Environment Cooperation Commission established through the environmental side agreement of the North American Free Trade Agreement. These two binational institutions help local communities, along a 100 kilometer band on either side of the U.S.-Mexico border to plan, certify, and finance infrastructure projects related to water and sewer needs. The CMBIFA would apply to non -water projects as well as water projects. The CMBIFA provide alternative financing to private and federal financing sources. Financing could facilitate SB 865 Page 6 economic development projects that would create employment opportunities in California by linking to complementary industries and economic growth in the Mexican border zone. The Chair recommends amendments that limit the CMBIFA's jurisdiction to the federally designated 100 kilometer band, as used by the NAFTA border institutions, on the California side of the border. City councilmembers appointed to the CMBIFA should likewise be from cities within the 100 kilometer band. The Chair also recommends limiting project proposals to and funding from the CMBIFA to those projects proposed by California entities and located in the State of California. The Chair also recommends deleting provisions requiring the State Treasurer to choose four Mexican residents to serve on the CMBIFA advisory committee. Related legislation Assembly Bill 552 (Firebaugh) would establishes the California -Mexico International Development Volunteer Pilot Program to be administered by the Office of California -Mexico Affairs in the Technology, Trade and Commerce Agency to provide one-time matching grants to non-profit, community -based organizations to fund volunteer technical assistance to local communities in Mexico. SUPPORT: Development, Design & Engineering Imperial County OPPOSITION: None on file Analysis Prepared by Pedro Villegas / J., E.D. & E. / (916) 319-2090 of 6 OR/07/71101 1-4;4 PM DSO al] .4rot SAN DIEGO UNION —TRIBUNE August 26., 2001" Bizarre bill Imagine if Sacramento ran border counties bizarre pieceof legis lation quietly winding its way through the Legislature would usurp critical land -rise powers from local governments in San Diego County and turn them over to a board dominated by state appointees. No, it's not the regional govern-,, ment proposaL That plan is an extremely modest, locallycon- trolled system compared to the virtual takeover of our county by Senate Majority Leader Richard Polanco, D-Los'Atigeles;. through his SB 865. Polanco's bill would establish the California and Meat co Border Infrastructure Financ- ing •Authority. This authority, dominated by appointees froth outside San Diego County, would. make decisions on infiastucture. projects -water, sewer, transpor- tation, etc. for a region encotn- paseing.60 miles on either side of the border. That's- much of our county.._ Almost everybody in the region opposes this bill the city of San Diego, the county of San Diego, - theSan Diego Association of Gov- ernments, theCounty Water Au-. thonity and the SanDiegoRegion- al Chamber of Commerce. ` The 'Tijuana Economic Development Council is against it, too. Last week, the executive director of the Tijuana council sent a letter to Gov. Gray Davis, protesting that the Polanco bill "fails to take into account Mexican sovereignty." • "Solutions have to be based in the spirit and philosophy of people who live in the region," Pedro Romero Torres Torija wrote, not ... in decisions that are taking place far away from the border area." The proposed authority board would be made up. of 11 members, • only four of whom would be from the border region — two from San Diego County and two from Impe- rial County. The: governor and the' Legislature's leadership would ap- point. the rest, very likely people . froin the Los Angeles area. and . otherparts of the state where polit ical power resides. The funding for the authority. also is suspect 'Apparently, San Diego County would be the cash cow. The money for projects would come from lease -revenue bonds, and 'fees levied on those bonds would pay for the authori-• • ty's bureaucracy. It's clear this authority would • meddle in local. planning matters. • When asked how . the authority. would impact the promising pro- posal for a joint San Diego -Tijuana • aqueduct to the Colorado Ever, :a Member of Polanco.'s staff claimed the project wouldn't be funded. • Polanco dpesn't have San Diego . County's interests at heart; that's for sure.. And there's something else fishy about this bill. The bonding agthotity•would apply to bothpub• - lic and private projects. In other words, private companies could get publicly backed leaserevenue bond financing. It's one thing for public agencies . to contract with private companies to build. proj- ects; it's ' quite another to allow. entirely . private projects ,to get , bond money. Several entities already are ad dressing border Infrastructure needs; Polanco'sagency would be duplicative. If state officials really Want an improved border region, they should allocate money to spe-:. cific projects, The Polanco propos- al is nothing more than a raid. Sirens should be blaring. DEC. 9.1995 10:59PM N0.2879 P. 3 San Diego ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS MEMO ITEM #27 9/4/01 August 29, 2001 TO: Interested Parties FROM: Gary L. Gallegos, Executive Director SUBJECT: Summary of Assembly Bill 93 (Wayne) - Creating the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Airport Land Use Planning - Public Utilities Code section 21670.3 State law requires the establishment of an airport land use commission in every county with an airport with scheduled airline service. SANDAL serves as the airport land use commission in San Diego County. The bill would authorize the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority (Authority) to do the airport land use planning. The Authority would have to adopt a comprehensive land use plan (for all airports) by June 30, 2005. SANDAG's land use plan will stay in effect until June 30, 2005, unless the Authority adopts a plan prior to that date. The Authority's plan would have to meet the same requirements SANDAG's plan currently meets pursuant to Public Utilities Code section 21675. General Provisions - Public Utilities Code sections 170000 through 170026 The jurisdiction of the Authority will be all of San Diego County. (§ 170004) North area cities are defined as Carlsbad, Del Mar, Encinitas, Escondido, Oceanside, San Marcos, Solana Beach, and Vista. (§ 17006(f)(1)) South County Cities are defined as Coronado, Imperial Beach, Chula Vista, National City, Lemon Grove, El Cajon, La Mesa, Santee, and Poway. (§ 17006(f)(2)) The interim executive director of the Authority shall be the Director of Airport Operations for the Port and shall serve until January 6, 2003. (§ 170010) In interim executive director is to appoint five persons to the interim board who are currently serving as elected officials or appointees of local, state or federal agencies or bodies. (§ 170012(c)) The first meeting of the interim board is to be on January 7, 2002, and there will be monthly meetings until December 2, 2002. (§170012(d)-(e)) Under section 170014, the interim board is to be assisted on all matters related to the transfer of Lindbergh Field to -the Authority by a management advisory committee made up of: DEC. 9.1995 11:00PM NO. 2879 P. 4 • The general manager of MTDB • SANDAG's Executive Director • A representative of the Port Section 170016 states the members of the permanent board will consist of nine members with varied initial terms: Executive Committee • A member of the public appointed by the County Board of Supervisors; initial term two years • A resident of San Diego County, but not the City of San Diego appointed by the Governor; initial term six years • A member of the public appointed by the Mayor of the City of San Diego and confirmed by the City Council; initial term four years Retraining six members • The Mayor of San Diego or his appointee; initial term six years • A member of the public appointed by the Mayor of San Diego, initial term two years • The mayor of the most populous city in the North Cities or his/her appointee; initial term two years • If the mayor of the most populous city in the North is serving, then a member of the public residing in a North City, or if not the mayor of the most populous city, then a mayor from another city in the North; initial term four years • The mayor of the most populous city in the South Cities or his/her appointee; initial term six years • If the mayor of the most populous city in the South is serving, then a member of the public residing in a South City, or if not the mayor of the most populous city, then a mayor from another city in the South; initial term four years The initial chair will be the resident appointed by the Governor to serve on the Executive Committee. After that the Executive Committee will appoint the chair. The initial members are to be selected on or before October 31, 2002 and shall be seated on the board by December 2, 2002. Any seat not filled will be filled by the Governor. After their initial term of office, all board members will serve for four years. Section 170022: Members are to be paid $100 per meeting, and for no more than four meetings per month. Section 170024: Members of the executive committee will receive a salary equal to that of a San Diego superior court judge. The executive committee will appoint the following officers for the Authority: Executive Director, General Counsel, and Auditor. Powers and Duties of the Authority — Public utilities Code sections 170030-170082 The powers are typical with the following exceptions: 2 DEC. 9, 1995 11:00PM NO. 2879 P. 5 Section 170034: The Authority will have eminent domain authority. Section 170048: Exclusive responsibility for planning, studying and executing improvements, expansions, construction or enhancements to the regional airport system. SANDAG (or its successor) shall include all of the Authority's airport systems plans and facilities selected by the authority in its Regional Transportation Plan. SANDAL and the Port must transfer all airport -related contracts to the Authority within 60 days after the effective date of this chapter, including all revenues, grants and local funds committed to those contracts. The Authority may continue JAAC and must . complete the airport site selection study begun by JAAC by June 30, 2003. Section 170052: The Authority's shall be responsible for developing all aspects of airport facilities under its jurisdiction including, but not limited to: • Locations of terminals, hangers, parking lots, etc. • Street and highway access to airports • Developing mass transit to and from airports • Analyzing and developing passenger rail service connected to airports Section 170054: Creates an airport advisory committee. Section 170056: The Port must transfer title and ownership of the San Diego International Airport to the Authority and transfer all revenues. Section 170058: The Port is still responsible for dean up and rennediation of toxic waste at the airport. Section 170062(d): The transfer from the Port to the Authority shall be done by October 31, 2002. Section 170064: The Port shall loan the authority $1 million for its first year of operation to be repaid by January 1, 2008. The Authority may raise revenues to fund all of its activities. It may receive state and federal grants. Section 170066: The authority is the only agency in the County of San Diego authorized to receive state or federal grants for the purposes of planning, constructing, or making other improvements to civilian airports. The authority shall cooperate with all other airports in the county to further the development of a countywide aviation system, and shall facilitate the pass -through of state and federal grants to local airport operators, if those grants are for purposes that are consistent with the aviation element of the regional transportation plan or with an adopted program of projects. Section 170068: The authority may accept the transfer of ownership of other publicly owned airports in the County. 3 DEC. 9.1995 11:00PM NO. 2879 P. 6 Section 170070: The authority uiay issue bonds. Section 170072: The authority may levy special benefit assessments. Repeal and Dissolution - Public Utilities Code section 170090 The authority shall be dissolved on the enactment date of a statute that creates a regional agency and all of its powers and duties shall be transferred to the newly created regional agency. 4 The San Diego. Union Tribune • Thursday; August 30, 2001 Bill would airpOt a new boss County authority planned to assume Port District's role By Bill Ainsworth STAFF WRITER SACRAMENTO — Two San Diego lawmakers have intro- duced legislation that would re- move control over Lindbergh Field from the Port District and. give it to a proposed county authority. The legislation, which is to be heard in the local govern- ment committee of the state Senate Tuesday, is a scaled - down version of the recommen- dations of the San Diego Re- gional Government Efficiency Commission. It was one of the few commission recommenda- tions that gathered support: `This is a more responsible and appropriate way to plan the airport's future," said Assem- blyman Howard. Wayne, D-San Diego. The legislation is substantial- ly less than, what is recom mended . in the regional com- mission's final report, delivered to the Legislature Aug.1. The commission recom- mended forming an airport au- thority that would have land - use powers, including the .pow- er to obtain private land through eminent domain, plus the power to issue bonds to finanoe.const action. Under the legislative proposal; the new body would have no new land use or taxing powers. Wayne is carrying Assembly Bill 93, which would create the Saii'Diego Regional Airport Au- thority. The authority would consolidate airport planning; which is now done by the San Diego Association of Govern- • ments, and Lindbergh field op- erations, which are handled by the San Diego Unified Port Dis- trict State Sen. Steve Peace, D-El Cajon, who has pushed region- al government iri San Diego, said . all Democrats hi the San Diego delegation support the plan. Peace 'said the new body would give residents through- out the county a voice In :the future of the airport Commis- sioners of the Port District rep- resent only the coastal cities. Assemblywoman Patricia Bates; R Laguna Niguel, who represents part of north San Diego County, said she hadn't seen the proposal but she be- lieves it is going in the right direction. 'The fact that North County is now being represented is good news," she said. The authority wduld be run by a nine -member .board of di- rectors representing the city of San Diego, other cities in the county and the unincorporated county areas. . The members would include the San Diego mayor and two other residents of that city, a mayor and another resident of a North County city, and a may- or and resident who live in the. South or East County. Two residents would repre- sent the unincorporated areas = one appointed by the county Board of Supervisors and the other by the governor. Three of the•authority mem- bers would serve as a full-time executive committee to run the operations. The authority could also manage other airports, but only if those airports' current opera- tors opted to join the authority, said Peace. The current director of air- port operations would be Elie interim director, charged With managing the transfer of Lind- bergh Field to the new authori- The transfer would take place by Oct 31, 2002. The new authority, Peace said, would be set up by the Legislature. It could not de- pend on a public vote because the port was set up by the Leg- islature in 1962 and can only -be changed by the Legislature, The San Diego commission called for the proposed authori- ty to be put before voters coun- tywide in March. ..