Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2005 05-17 CC AGENDA PKT
L Agenda Of A Regular Meeting National City City Council Council Chambers Civic Center 1243 National City Boulevard Regular Meeting - Tuesday — May 17, 2005 - 6:00 P.M. Open To The Public Please complete a request to speak form prior to the commencement of the meeting and submit it to the City Clerk. It is the intention of your City Council to be receptive to your concerns in this community. Your participation in local government will assure a responsible and efficient City of National City. We invite you to bring to the attention of the City Manager any matter that you desire the City Council to consider. We thank you for your presence and wish you to know that we appreciate your involvement. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by Mayor Nick Inzunza Public Oral Communications (Three -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to state law, items requiring Council action must be brought back on a subsequent Council Agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. Upon request, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at 336-4228 to request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Spanish audio interpretation is provided during Council Meetings. Audio headphones are available in the lobby at the beginning of the meetings. Audio interpretation en espafiol se proporciona durante sesiones del Consejo Municipal. Los audiofonos estan disponibles en el pasillo al principio de la junta. Council Requests That All Cell Phones And Pagers Be Turned Off During City Council Meetings COPIES OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDAS AND MINUTES MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH OUR WEBSITE AT www.ci.national-city.ca.us COUNCIL AGENDA 05/17/05 PAGE 2 PROCLAMATIONS Proclaiming Thursday, April 28, 2005 as: "PEGGY ROARK'S DAY Proclaiming Wednesday, May 11, 2005 as: "PEACE OFFICERS MEMORIAL DAY" Proclaiming Sunday, May 15, 2005, thru Saturday, May 21, 2005, as: "NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC WORKS WEEK" Proclaiming the month of May 2005 as: "HISPANIC ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AWARENESS MONTH Proclaiming the month of May, 2005 as: "ASTHMA AWARENESS MONTH IN NATIONAL CITY" PRESENTATIONS May Employee of the Month Program — Norma Urias, Finance Secretary 1. Community Services Strategic Plan 2. FY 05/06 Budget direction or action may be taken - Program Change Discussion CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. 3. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 3, 2005. 4. Approval of a motion to waive reading of the text of all Ordinances considered at this meeting and provides that such Ordinances shall be introduced and/or adopted after a reading of the title only. (City Clerk) 5. Resolution setting a Public Hearing for June 7, 2005 to amend Chapter 11.32 of the National City Municipal Code regarding parking restrictions for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. (Engineering) COUNCIL AGENDA 05/17/05 PAGE 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 6. Resolution of the City Council of National City approving Change Order Number One to HMS Construction for Sweetwater Road at Calmoor Street and Fairlomas Drive traffic signal installation, Spec. No. 03-10, in the amount of $4,970 for removal and replacement of a block wall to meet Americans With Disability Act (ADA) compliance and authorizing the City Engineer to approve and sign the change order. (Engineering) 7. Resolution of the City Council authorizing the closure of Ninth Street from National City Boulevard to the westerly side of the alley that runs between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. (Community Development Commission) 8. Resolution authorizing execution of Order to Vacate and Close an unimproved portion of K Avenue at the end of the cul-de-sac, north of 13th Street. (Case File No. SC-2004-1) (Planning) 9. Item withdrawn at Staff's request after the agenda was printed, in concurrence with the City Manager's Office. 10. Resolution authorizing expenditure of reimbursable funds in the amount of $25,504.00 for Mobile Data Terminal Equipment for the Police Department from the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program FY 2004 Grant Fund. (Police) 11. Resolution of the City Council of National City awarding a contract to California Commercial Pool in the amount of $991,000 and appropriating $413,327 in funding received via two State grants ($157,327, Roberti-Z'berg Harris Block Grant and $256,000 Per Capita Grant), for the Renovation Improvement of the National City Municipal Swimming Pool. (Engineering) 12. Resolution of the City Council of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute and agreement with Katz Architecture in the amount of $92,500 to design the City Council Chambers remodel/renovation project, which includes the Council Chambers and conference rooms, third floor lobby areas and restrooms, and the elevator lobby area. (Engineering) COUNCIL AGENDA 05/17/05 PAGE 4 CONSENT CALENDAR (cont.) 13. Report on the removal of underground fuel storage tanks at the Police Station Headquarters and the Public Works yard. (Public Works) 14. WARRANT REGISTER # 41 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $606,816.47. 15. WARRANT REGISTER # 42 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $ 2,693,753.63. 16. Claim for Damages: Salvador Pulido III (City Clerk) TEMPORARY USE PERMITS 17. Temporary Use Permit — Lion's Club — 4th of July Celebration from June 27 — July 5, 2005 at Kimball Park. (Building & Safety) 18. Temporary Use Permit — National City Chamber of Commerce National City Safety Fair. - Kimball Park, Saturday, September 17, 2005 from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m. (Building & Safety) 19. Temporary Use Permit — National City Chamber of Commerce National City Auto Heritage Day. August 7, 2005 at Kimball Park. (Building & Safety) 20. Temporary Use Permit — American Cancer Society — National City Relay for Life, August 20-21, 2005. (Building & Safety) PUBLIC HEARINGS 21. Continued Public Hearing - Proposed subdivision and planned unit development for 21 single-family residential parcels on a 6-acre vacant site southwest of the southerly terminus of Rachael Avenue. (Applicant: Pacific Scene Homes) (Case File #: S 2004-12/PUD 2004-01/ IS 2004-09) (Planning) COUNCIL AGENDA 05/17/05 PAGE 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (cont.) 22. Public Hearing — An Amendment to the Boundary of the National City Downtown Specific Plan to include properties at the southeast corner of 8th Street and D Avenue. (Applicant: Howard Blackson for Gulf Unlimited Corp.) (Case File #: SP- 2005-1) (Planning) 23. Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit for the sale of beer and wine and for Karaoke at Casa Del Taco Restaurant at 1635 Sweetwater Road. (Applicant: Cesar Carrillo) (Case File #: CUP-2005-1) (Planning) ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION 24. An Ordinance amending Section 10.52.010 of the National City Municipal Code to prohibit the use of tobacco and tobacco -related products in outdoor recreation areas and facilities. (City Attorney) NEW BUSINESS 25. Resolution approving a waiver requested by Pacific Scene Homes, the builder of the housing development south of Paradise Valley Road and east of Plaza Boulevard, requiring the undergrounding of the electrical utility services serving the Wellington Estates property located south and west of the development. (Engineering) 26. Schedule workshop to consider an Ethics Code and Campaign contribution limits. (City Attorney) 27. Authorization to Initiate Manager's recommendations for Port of San Diego consideration of infrastructure needs, property utilization and consultant hiring. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 28. National City Transit Report — John Webster STAFF MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL Next Regular City Council Meeting — Tuesday — June 7, 2005 - 6:00 p.m. — Council Chambers, Civic Center TAPE RECORDINGS OF EACH CITY COUNCIL MEETING ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WHEREAS, Peggy was bon ANNA E THORNBERG on April 28, 1919, in Pueblo Colorado; and by summer of 1946 Peggy and her husband discovered National City, and decided this was the place to locate their first business, called CROWN CARPET & LINOLEUM CO., now known as ROARK'S CARPET & LINOLEUM CO. located on 8th street.; and WHEREAS, Peggy first became active in the community at Central Elementary School, when she joined and eventually became President of the PTA; and WHERE, Peggy took on the role of Chairmanship of the first March of Dimes Parade, and the store on 8th where all coins were kept on display in the front window. WHEREAS, Peggy, members of the community and National City contractor Broadway, were the basic founders of the original Boys Club of National City which was constructed by the use of donated labor and materials; and WHEREAS, After the start of the Boys Club, Peggy took on the task of assisting in the National City Girls Club. By herself she solicited the all the materials and labor to build the double kitchen for the Girls Club and the building in which it was constructed; and WHEREAS, Peggy became active in the women's organizations such as Altrusa Club, a business women's service organization; and was also the fast woman president of the National City Chamber of Commerce in the early 70's where she was trained by the very able Edith Hughes as to her duties as President of the Board of Directors of this positive and ever influencing advocate for the City; and WHEREAS, Peggy always felt that if a community is good to you by using the goods and services you offer, you have a duty to offer your time for the broader benefit of the community. National City was very good for the family business, and in her actions and deeds she did her best to say "Thank You." THEREFORE, as Mayor & City Council, by the virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of National City, do hereby proclaim Thursday, April 28, 2005 as: PEGGY ROARK'S DAY We call upon all citizens of National City to recognize Peggy Roark for her contributions to the City of National City. _ CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WHEREAS, of all the promises America offers, none is more precious or more elusive than the right to be free from crime and violence; and WHEREAS, the dedicated men and women who have chosen law enforcement as a career face extraordinary risks and danger in preserving our freedom and security; and WHEREAS, during the month of May, National Police Week is observed throughout the nation to recognize the hazardous work, serious responsibilities and strong commitment to our nation's peace officers; and WHEREAS, in conjunction with this important observance, May 11th is observed as San Diego County Peace Officers Memorial Day in commemoration of those noble officers who have tragically sacrificed their lives in the line of duty; and WHEREAS, these special observances provide all Californians with the opportunity to appreciate the heroic men and women who have dedicated their lives in preserving public safety; and WHEREAS, this year we give special recognition to all of the men and women of Law Enforcement who have lost their lives while fulfilling their commitment. THEREFORE, as Mayor & City Council, by virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of National City, do hereby proclaim Wednesday, May 11, 2005 as: PEACE OFFICERS MEMORIAL DAY We call upon all citizens of National City to remember those individuals who gave their lives for our safety and express appreciation to those who continue to dedicate themselves to making National City a safer community in which to live. 1• lUff ir . Mayor Ron Morrison Frank Parra Vice Mayor Councilmember ''sN:r� ounc' . , . er Rosalie G. $arai� Councilwoman '1.4.1417.414PliAlkirrO -15 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WHEREAS, public works services provided in out community are an integral part our citizen's everyday lives; and WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, streets and highways, public buildings, and solid waste collection; and WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning design, and construction, is vitally dependent upon the efforts and sldlls of public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform. THEREFORE, as Mayor & City Council, by virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of National City, do hereby proclaim the week of May 15 — May 21, 2005 as: NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC WORKS WEEK We call upon all citizens of National City to recognize the National City Public Works for their dedication and contributions to the community. C,GJ�c Nick lnzunza Mayor Frank Parra Councilmember V/J i CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WHEREAS, the Sweetwater Union High School district Mariachi in the Schools Program will hold its 9th Annual Gala Dinner on Friday, May 20, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Mariachi Scholarship Foundation enhances the education of participating students by supporting the study and performance of mariachi music in schools and awarding college scholarships to deserving graduating students who have participated in the program; and WHEREAS, the Mariachi Scholarship Foundation promotes the Hispanic culture through music and dance; and WHEREAS, the City of National City is a diverse community, rich in heritage and culture; and WHEREAS, the City of National City would like to support and promote the Mariachi Sponsorship Foundation's efforts to support students in their quest to further their education through college scholarships. THEREFORE, as Mayor & City Council, by virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of National City, do hereby proclaim the month of May 2005 as: MARIACHI MONTH We call upon all citizens of National City take a moment to commemorate this event in their own individual manner. aeal Nick Inzunzaa Mayor Ron Morrison Vice Mayor Frank ' arra Councilmember CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WHEREAS, Alzheimer's disease affects 4.5 million Americans from many different backgrounds and is the fourth leading cause of death in adults. It is a progressive, degenerative disease that attacks the brain and results in impaired memory, thinking, and behavior, and WHEREAS, established in 1980, it is the mission of the Alzheimer's Association San Diego Chapter, to provide essential services in our communities that improve the lives of individuals coping with Alzheimer's disease. This mission is carried through: o Patient and Family Services to aid present and future persons with Alzheimer's and their caregivers. o Education of the public and information for health care professionals. o Advocacy for improved public policy and needed legislation on the local, state, and national levels o Support of Research into the cause, prevention, treatment and cure of Alzheimer's disease and related disorders; and WHEREAS, the Alzheimer's Association San Diego Chapter has demonstrated remarkable compassion and support for their clients and families and has made it a priority to offer information, programs, and services that effectively serve people from all backgrounds; and WHEREAS, there are more than 240,000 individuals and families affected by Alzheimer's disease in San Diego County, including an estimated 1,200 Hispanics in the South Bay area. Therefore, improving Alzheimer's disease awareness, knowledge and care services for Hispanic Alzheimer patients and their families is a priority for the Alzheimer's Association. THEREFORE, as Mayor & City Council, by virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of National City, do hereby proclaim the month of May 2005 as: Hispanic Alzheimer's Disease Awareness Month We call upon all National City families to seek out the help and support of the Alzheimer's Association San Diego Chapter, a recognized leader in bringing culturally competent information and programs to the community. / lick 1`innza' Mayor Ron Morrison Frank Parra Vice Mayor Councilmember uis Na Counci �I - Rosalie G. Zar Councilwoman • 4” I al CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WHEREAS, Asthma has reached epidemic proportions in the United States, affecting about 20 million people; and WHEREAS, Asthma is the leading cause of childhood hospitalizations, long-term illness, and school absenteeism, accounting for more than 14 million missed school days each year; and WHEREAS, Each year 2 million people are rushed to the emergency room and 5,000 people die from asthma; and WHEREAS, Asthma is a long-term, inflammatory disease in which the airways of the lungs constrict, causing wheezing, breathlessness, and cou . hing; and WHEREAS, Exposure to allergens and irritants such as dust mites, mold, cockroaches, pet dander, and secondhand smoke can bring on an asthma episode; and WHEREAS, Secondhand smoke worsens children's asthma in up to one million children; and WHEREAS, There are simple steps people can take to reduce their exposure to environmental asthma triggers. THEREFORE, as Mayor & City Council, by the virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of National City, do hereby proclaim the month of May, 2005 as: ASTHMA AWARENESS MONTH IN NATIONAL CI lock In Mayor Frank Parra Councilmember Rosalie G. Z Councilwoman \ --��, City of National City Human Resources Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-4301 Phone: (619) 336-4300 TDD: (619) 336-4304 MEMORANDUM May 12, 2005 TO Chris Zapata, City Manager FROM Alfredo J. Lopez III, Director of Human Resource SUBJECT EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH PROGRAM The Employee of the Month Program communicates the City's appreciation for outstanding performance. In so doing, it recognizes employees who maintain high standards of personal conduct and make significant contributions to the work environment and community. The employee selected by the Finance Department to be recognized for the month of May 2005 is Norma Urias, Finance Secretary (nomination attached). Ms. Urias has been invited to attend the Council meeting on Tuesday, May 17, 2005, to be recognized for her achievements and service. Attachment (1) xc: Department Director Norma Urias Councilmember Natividad Special Asst to the Mayor James Slade, MEA President AJL:Igr Performance Recognition Program (2) ® Recycled Paper City of National City Performance Recognition Award Nomination Form The Finance Department proudly nominates NORMA URIAS for the Performance Recognition Award for the following reasons: Please state reason why your nominee should receive an award, (i.e., examples of service beyond requirements of position, exemplary service to the public, outstanding job performance, etc). Do not exceed 150 total words. Please be as specific as possible when giving your examples. Norma can be counted on to support all staff without complaint and when needed has gone the extra mile to meet deadlines. Finance department has gone through a lot of changes but inspite of this Norma's attitude towards work has never wavered. She is very helpful and supportive to everybody. Since Norma has joined our department she has worked very hard to organize our files and procedures. She never complains about all that she does for us. She is always there when needed and volunteers without being asked. She will always be a very valued employee. FORWARD COMPLETED NOMINATIONS TO: Nominated Signature: National City Performance Recognition Program Human Resources Director by: Alison Hunter Q Date: NC PersDept Form 2003 City of National City Performance Recognition Award Nomination Form The Finance Department proudly nominates NORMA URIAS for the Performance Recognition Award for the following reasons: Please state reason why your nominee should receive an award, (i.e., examples of service beyond requirements of position, exemplary service to the public, outstanding job performance, etc). Do not exceed 150 total words. Please be as specific as possible when giving your examples. Norma can be counted on to support all staff without complaint and when needed has gone the extra mile to meet deadlines. Finance department has gone through a lot of changes but inspite of this Norma's attitude towards work has never wavered. She is very helpful and supportive to everybody. Since Norma has joined our department she has worked very hard to organize our files and procedures. She never complains about all that she does for us. She is always there when needed and volunteers without being asked. She will always be a very valued employee. FORWARD COMPLETED NOMINATIONS TO: National City Performance Recognition Program Human Resources Director Nominated by: Alison Hunter Signature: Date: 5 - /6 - 0 S NC PersDept Form 2003 ITEM # 1 05/17/05 PRESENTATION COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT STRATEGIC PLAN ITEM # 2 05/17/05 FY 05/06 Budget - Program Change Discussion (City Manager) ITEM # 3 05/17/05 Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council Meeting of May 3, 2005 ITEM #4. 5/17/05 City of National City Office of the City Clerk 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950-4397 Michael R. Dalla — City Clerk (619)336-4226 (619) 336-4229 To: Honorable Mayor and Council From: Michael Dalla, City Clerk Subject: Ordinance Introduction and Adoption It is recommended that the City Council approve the following motion as part_ of the Consent Calendar: "That the City Council waive reading of the text of all Ordinances considered at thismeeting and provide that such Ordinances shall be introduced and/or adopted after a reading of only the title". mrd City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE May 17, 2005 5 AGENDA ITEM NO. (ITEM TITLE A Resolution setting of a Public Hearing for June 7, 2005 to amend Chapter 11.32 of the National City Municipal Code regarding parking restrictions on heavy-duty commercial vehicles. PREPARED BY Adam Landa DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4380 EXPLANATION Attached is a City Attorney report and the proposed Chapter 11.32. The changes are a result of complaints that heavy-duty commercial vehicles are parking in residential zones for prolonged periods of time and that vehicle greater than 6' in height are parking within 50' of intersections. Adoption of these amendments to the Municipal Code requires a Public Hearing. It is recommended the hearing be set for June 7, 2005, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. Notification will be sent to the affected .property owners and the Public Hearing will be noticed in accordance with the law. L ( Environmental Review )N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the• ubli ' earing be approved for June 7, 2005. BOARD / COMMISSIO ECOMMENDATION N/A LATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution 2. Request for public hearing 3. Staff Report and Chapter 11.32 A-200 (Rev. 7/03) STAFF REPORT Ordinance Amending Chapter 11.32 of the National City Municipal Code Regarding Parking Restrictions on Heavy-duty Commercial Vehicles The attached ordinance for adoption addresses parking problems associated with heavy duty commercial vehicles in all residential areas city-wide, and detached trailers in the industrial/commercial areas west of National City Boulevard. The ordinance has been developed in coordination with the Police, Planning, Engineering and Public Works Departments. Copies of the proposed ordinance have also been circulated to the Traffic and Safety Committee, the Chamber of Commerce and the Miles of Cars Association. CVC Section 22507 allows a city to restrict parking of vehicles greater than 6' in height within 100' of an intersection. Signage is required. CVC Section 22507.5 allows a city to restrict parking between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. daily (or other specified days) and to prohibit or restrict heavy duty commercial vehicles in residential districts, as may be defined by reference to city zoning. To implement this authority, the following is proposed: 1. Section 11.32.140 is to be amended to add new subsection E to allow the City Engineer to post signs within 50' of sight restricted intersections to prohibit the parking of any vehicles greater than 6' in height. The restriction is intended to prohibit blocking of stop signs at signed intersections. This will include any SUV or panel truck that exceeds the height limit. Towing is allowable when the sign designates removal. The 50' distance may be extended up to 100' upon council resolution. Signage would be required in the designated areas. 50' is selected to rationally deal with parking shortages. Subsection F and G are added for technical clarification of current parking restrictions. 2. Section 11.32.310 is to be amended for technical clarification and remove a latent ambiguity with Section 11.32.060. Section 11.32.310 currently prohibits parking in excess of 24 hours, except where otherwise restricted, while Section 11.32.060 allows parking not to exceed 72 hours, and towing thereafter. Engineering recommended amendment to Section 11.32.310 to allow temporary signage for construction and utility services to be installed, and to allow towing provided signs are installed at least 24 hours in advance. The net effect will be to preclude incongruity with the 72-hour rule and thereby legitimate towing, and also allow a legal basis for temporary signage and towing to alleviate traffic impaction due to construction and utility work. There does not appear to be any basis in the Vehicle Code for a general 24-hour restriction. 3. Section 11.32.360 is to be amended pursuant to CVC Section 22507.5 to add vehicles exceeding 10,000 pounds GVWR to the existing heavy-duty commercial , 6 ' Staff Report May 2, 2005 Page Two the City upon which the contiguous property is zoned for residential use (single- family, multi -family and apartments). This will include most of the city east of National City Boulevard, the residential areas west of National City Boulevard and 1-5, and a few blocks west of 1-5. Pursuant to CVC 22507.5, heavy-duty commercial vehicles will be allowed to park for three (3) hours plus the time necessary to load, unload or perform services in all residential districts, and would be allowed to park without limitation in front of or alongside any industrial or commercial structure or facility. At all other times, these vehicles would be prohibited to park between 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. daily east of National City Boulevard. Generally, enforcement would occur on a complaint basis, and enforcement officers would be required to post a notice of violation (not a parking citation) on a non -compliant vehicle for at least 24 hours before a parking citation may be issued. Once tagged, citations may then be issued to the specified vehicle thereafter without further notice, and towing would be allowed after 72 hours has elapsed, or where removal signs are posted. Signage posting is not anticipated except in those areas with a high complaint history. 4. Section 11.32.365 is added pursuant to CVC Section 22507.5 to allow the Council the option of restricting the parking of detached heavy-duty commercial trailers (flatbeds, trailers and dollies) on streets west of National City Boulevard in commercial and industrial districts. (These vehicles would be preempted from parking in the residential districts west of National City Boulevard by the proposed amendment to NCMG Section 11.32.360). The prohibitions would apply only to detached trailers, and not to other heavy-duty motorized commercial vehicles in that area. The proposed restrictions would allow the Council to adopt focused resolutions to restrict parking of detached trailers on specific streets or blocks once a problem is determined to exist, and to tailor the restriction as to duration, days of week and whether or not towing is to be permitted for violation. Signage would be required. PUBLIC HEARING Adoption of this proposed ordinance to amend Section 11.32.360 will require a public hearing pursuant to CVC Section 22507.5. (The other amendments do not require a public hearing, but are included for completeness). Chapter 11.32 STOPPING, STANDING AND PARKING 11.32.140 Stopping or parking prohibited— Signs required. The city traffic engineer shall appropriately sign or mark the following places and when so signed or marked no person shall stop, stand or park a vehicle in any of said places: A. At any place within twenty feet of a point on the curb immediately opposite the midblock end of a safety zone; B. At any place within twenty-five feet of an intersection in the central traffic district or m any business district except that a bus may stop at a designated bus stop; C. Within twenty-five feet of the approach to any traffic signal, boulevard stop sign, or official electric flashing device; D. At any place where the city traffic engineer determines that it is necessary in order to eliminate unusual traffic hazard; E. Except where a different distance is prescribed by council resolution, within fifty (50) feet of any intersection marked with a sign that prohibits any vehicle whose height with or without a load exceeds six (6) feet; F. At any location where parking is restricted or prohibited between hours designated by resolution of the City Council; G. Any vehicle parked in violation of this section may also be towed after a parking citation has been issued, provided a sign has been posted authorizing the removal of vehicles parked in violation of such parking restriction. 11.32.310 Temporary Parking restrictions and Time limit —generally. It is unlawful for any person to stop, stand or park any vehicle on any street in the city at any location where temporary signs have been installed by the City Engineer prohibiting parking for purposes of maintaining or redirecting vehicular traffic during construction or street or utility service repair, provided at least twenty-four (24) hours prior notice of such restriction has been given in accordance with California Vehicle Code section 22651 (1) or (m). Any installed sign may also authorize removal of a vehicle parked in violation of such parking restriction, and such vehicle may thereafter be towed after a parking citation has been issued. 11.32.360 Heavy duty commercial vehicles —parking restrictions in all Residential Districts and East of National City Boulevard. A. No person shall park any heavy duty commercial vehicle more than three -hours on a street in any residential district except: 1. While actually loading or unloading property, and the time to complete the evolution in addition to such three-hour period is reasonably necessary to complete the work; or vehicle definition, and to define "residential districts" to include all streets within (10,000) pounds GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating), any single trailer or combination of trailers twenty feet or more in length, or any single trailer or combination of trailers six feet, eight inches or more in width, including dump truck trailers, dollies, moving van trailers, pole or pipe dollies, house or travel trailers, or flat bed or enclosed trailers, none of which is attached to a truck, tractor or similar vehicle capable of towing, pulling or otherwise moving the trailer. C. For purposes of this section, a "commercial or industrial district" shall mean any block, street or streets where the contiguous property on that block is zoned for a commercial or industrial occupancy pursuant to Chapters 18.16 or 18.18 of this code. D. After a parking citation has been issued, any unattended heavy duty detached trailer parked in violation of this section may be towed from any street upon which signage authorizing removal is posted, in addition to being subject to tow when parked for more than 72 consecutive hours pursuant to section 11.32.060. 2. When such vehicle is parked in connection with, and in aid of, the performance of a service to or on a property, in the block in which such vehicle is parked and the time to complete the evolution in addition to such three-hour period is reasonably necessary to complete such service; or 3. Such vehicle is parked immediately in front or along side of premises actively devoted to industry or commerce and lying contiguous to the street. B. Except as provided in subsection A, no person shall park any heavy duty commercial vehicle on any street east of and including National City Boulevard between the hours of 2:00 AM and 6:00 AM daily. C. For the purpose of this section, heavy duty commercial vehicle means a single vehicle or combination of vehicles having more than two axles or weighing more than ten thousand (10,000) pounds GVWR (Gross Vehicle Weight Rating), a single vehicle or combination of vehicles twenty feet or more in length, or a single vehicle or combination of vehicles six feet, eight inches or more in width, including dump trucks, moving vans, tractors, pole or pipe dollies, trailers, and detached trailers or detached flat bed trailers. It shall not include a recreational vehicle or travel trailer. D. For purposes of this section as authorized by California Vehicle Code section 22507.5, a "residential district" shall mean any street or streets where the contiguous property on that block is zoned for residential use pursuant to Chapter 18.14 of this code, including single family detached dwellings, multi -family dwellings, apartment houses, or combination. It shall not include that area south of Division Street, west of National City Boulevard, north of 8th Street and east of Interstate 5. E. Heavy duty commercial vehicles parked in violation of subsection B shall not be subject to citation until a minimum of 24 hours has elapsed following attachment of a notice to the vehicle directing its removal. The notice directing removal shall set forth the contents of this section and shall recite that the vehicle is in violation. After a particular vehicle has been tagged with a notice of removal and 24 hours has elapsed, parking citations may be issued thereafter for that vehicle for any further violations of this section without the necessity for further notice. F. After a parking citation has been issued, any heavy duty commercial vehicle parked in violation of this section may also be towed from any street upon which signage authorizing removal is posted, in addition to being subject to tow when parked for more than 72 consecutive hours pursuant to section 11.32.060. 11.32.365 Unattended Heavy Duty detached trailers —parking restrictions in Commercial and Industrial Districts. A. No person shall park any unattended heavy duty detached trailer more than three -hours on any street designated by Council resolution in a commercial or industrial district where signs are posted except: 1. While actually loading or unloading property, and the time to complete the evolution in addition to such three-hour period is reasonably necessary to complete the work; or 2. When such vehicle is parked in connection with, and in aid of, the actual performance of a service to or on a property in the block in which such vehicle is parked, and the time to complete the evolution in addition to such three-hour period is reasonably necessary to complete such service. B. For the purpose of this section, an unattached heavy duty detached trailer means a single trailer or combination of trailers having two axles or more or weighing more than ten thousand RESOLUTION NO. 2005 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR JUNE 7, 2005, TO CONSIDER AMENDING CHAPTER 11.32 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON HEAVY-DUTY COMMERCIAL VEHICLES WHEREAS, a public hearing is required to consider amending Chapter 11.32 of the National City Municipal Code regarding parking restrictions on heavy-duty commercial vehicles, which is being proposed in response to citizens' complaints that heavy-duty commercial vehicles are parking in residential zones for prolonged periods of time, and that vehicles over six feet (6') high are parking within fifty feet (50') of intersections. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the time for hearing any and all persons interested in parking restrictions on heavy-duty commercial vehicles is hereby set for 6:00 p.m. on June 7, 2005, in the City Council Chambers in the Civic Center, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to provide notice of the time and place of said hearing in accordance with the law. PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2005. Nick Inzunza, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 17, 2005 .eETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City of National City approving Change Order Number One to HMS Construction, Inc. for Sweetwater Rd. at Calmoor St. and Fairlomas Drive Traffic Signal Installation, Spec. No. 03- 10, in the amount of $4,970 for removal and replacement of a block wall to meet Federal Americans with Disabilities Act compliance, and authorizing the City Engineer to approve and sign the change order. PREPARED BY Alberto Griego DEPARTMENT Engineering 336-4386 EXPLANATION On August 3, 2004, by resolution No. 2004-141, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $125,190 to HMS Construction, Inc. for the Sweetwater Rd. at Calmoor St. and Fairlomas Drive Traffic Signal Installation, Specification No. 03-10. There is an existing block wall on the North East side of the project where a traffic signal pole will be installed leaving a shortage of space between the wall and the pole for wheelchair access per ADA standards. Engineering staff is recommending the approval of a change order to HMS Construction, Inc. in the amount of $4,970 for the removal and replacement of the existing block wall and concrete sidewalk panels at pole location "E" in order to increase the width to 48" between the block wall and the pole and satisfy ADA standards. The total amount of Contract Change Order Number One is $4,970, increasing the current cost of the project from $125,190 to $130,160, which is below the total estimated budget for the project of $156,487.50. Environmental Review _X N/A Financial Statement Approved By: The total budget for the project was estimated to be $156,487.50. Finance Director Funding is available through Account Number 109-409-500-598-6161 and 307-409-500-598-6035 for this change order. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD/COMMI N/A. N RECOMMENDATION f1TTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Resolution 2. Contract Change Order No. One Resolution No. 3. Proposal from HMS Construction, Inc. changeorderhms A-200 (9:99) • CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE: 5/03/05 PROJECT: Sweetwater Rd. at Calmoor St. and Fairlomas Drive, Specification No. 03-10 TO: Mr. Michael High, President HMS Construction, Inc. 1225 Linda Vista Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: This change order is written to add item number 10 to the contract (shown below). Current Contract Adjusted Contract (CO #1) No Item Unit Bid Qty Unit Price Amount Bid Qty Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3 Remove Concrete SF 750 $8.00 $6,000.00 750 $8.00 $6,000.00 4 Access Ramp EA 6 $1,340.00 $8,040.00 6 $1,340.00 $8,040.00 5 Traffic Signal Installation- LS 1 $100,890.00 $100,890.00 1 $100,890.00 $100,890.00 6 Traffic Stripping LS 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 Traffic Signing LS 1 $860.00 $860.00 1 $860.00 $860.00 A Removal and Replacement of Block Wall LS 1 $4,970.00 $4,970.00 Totals $125,190.00 ( $130,160.00 I DISCUSSION: This increase in contract price is due to existing limited space between a new Traffic Signal and an existing wall for ADA compliance. The wall will be removed and placed further behind its current location. This change order will modify the block wall to provide a minimum of 48" of space and replacement of sidewalk. CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT: As a result of this change order the contract price is adjusted as follows: 1. The contract price is increased in the amount of $4,970.00, from the current contract price of $125,190.00 to a new contract price of $130,160.00. 2. The contract time is increased by Ten (10) working days. A Notice to Proceed was given previously on Monday November 8, 2004, to do out of sequence work such as installation of conduit for traffic loops prior to installation of street and sidewalks by others. The time utilized was 10 working days. The remaining Page 1 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 working days, including the increase in time is now Thirty (30) working days. A Notice to Proceed is pending the completion of street and sidewalk work at the Bonita Creek project adjacent to this job. This change order shall be considered full compensation for fumishing and installing the materials, labor, tools and equipment, profit, overhead, and all incidentals for performing the work described above. HMS Construction, Inc. will not be entitled to damages or additional payment for delays as described in the 1997 edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Section 6-6.3, for performing the work as described above. RECOMMENDED F APPROVAL BY: Alberto Crriego, Asso APPROVED BY: Mr. Michael High resident HMS Construction, Inc. ngineer D Mr. Ronald Schneider, Vice President HMS Construction, Inc. 5 0 Da ao Date Stephen M. Kirkpatrick, City Engineer Date Page 2 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE: 5/03/05 PROJECT: Sweetwater Rd. at Calmoor St. and Fairlomas Drive, Specification No. 03-10 TO: Mr. Michael High, President HMS Construction, Inc. 1225 Linda Vista Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: This change order is written to add item number 10 to the contract (shown below). Current Contract Adjusted Contract CO #1 No Item Unit Bid Qty Unit Price Amount Bid Qty Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3 Remove Concrete SF 750 $8.00 $6,000.00 750 $8.00 $6,000.00 4 Access Ramp EA 6 $1,340.00 $8,040.00 6 $1,340.00 $8,040.00 5 Traffic Signal Installation LS 1 S100,890.00 $100,890.00 1 $100,890.00 $100,890.00 _ 6 Traffic Stripping LS 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 Traffic Signing LS 1 $860.00 $860.00 1 $860.00 $860.00 Removal and Replacement of Block Wall LS 1 $4,970.00 $4,970.00 $130,160.00 DISCUSSION: This increase in contract price is due to existing limited space between a new Traffic Signal and an existing wall for ADA compliance. The wall will be removed and placed further behind its current location. This change order will modify the block wall to provide a minimum of 48" of space and replacement of sidewalk. CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT: As a result of this change order the contract price is adjusted as follows: 1. The contract price is increased in the amount of $4,970.00, from the current contract price of $125,190.00 to a new contract price of $130,160.00. 2. The contract time is increased by Ten (10) working days. A Notice to Proceed was given previously on Monday November 8, 2004, to do out of sequence work such as installation of conduit for traffic loops prior to installation of street and sidewalks by others. The time utilized was 10 working days. The remaining Page 1 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 working days, including the increase in time is now Thirty (30) working days. A Notice to Proceed is pending the completion of street and sidewalk work at the Bonita Creek project adjacent to this job. This change order shall be considered full compensation for furnishing and installing the materials, labor, tools and equipment, profit, overhead, and all incidentals for performing the work described above. HMS Construction, Inc. will not be entitled to damages or additional payment for delays as described in the 1997 edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Section 6-6.3, for performing the work as described above. RECOMMENDED FO PROVAL BY: Alberto =, :oc:to ,F APPROVED BY: Mr. Michael High resident HMS Constructs , Inc. ngineer Mr. Ronald Schneider, Vice President HMS Construction, Inc. Date Date /*I yoleos- Date Stephen M. Kirkpatrick, City Engineer Date Page 2 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 DATE: 5/03/05 PROJECT: Sweetwater Rd. at Calmoor St. and Fairlomas Drive, Specification No. 03-10 TO: Mr. Michael High, President HMS Construction, Inc. 1225 Linda Vista Drive San Marcos, CA 92069 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: This change order is written to add item number 10 to the contract (shown below). Current Contract Adjusted Contract (CO #1) No Item Unit Bid Qty Unit Price Amount Bid Qty Unit Price Amount 1 Mobilization LS 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 3 Remove Concrete SF 750 $8.00 $6,000.00 750 $8.00 $6,000.00 4 Access Ramp EA 6 $1,340.00 $8,040.00 6 $1,340.00 $8,040.00 5 Traffic Signal Installation LS 1 $100,890.00 $100,890.00 1 $100,890.00 $100,890.00 6 Traffic Stripping LS 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 „ Traffic Signing LS 1 $860.00 $860.00 1 $860.00 $860.00 Removal and Replacement of Block Wall LS 1 $4,970.00 $4,970.00 otals DISCUSSION: This increase in contract price is due to existing limited space between a new Traffic Signal and an existing wall for ADA compliance. The wall will be removed and placed further behind its current location. This change order will modify the block wall to provide a minimum of 48" of space and replacement of sidewalk. CONTRACT ADJUSTMENT: As a result of this change order the contract price is adjusted as follows: 1. The contract price is increased in the amount of $4,970.00, from the current contract price of $125,190.00 to a new contract price of $130,160.00. 2. The contract time is increased by Ten (10) working days. A Notice to Proceed was given previously on Monday November 8, 2004, to do out of sequence work such as installation of conduit for traffic loops prior to installation of street and sidewalks by others. The time utilized was 10 working days. The remaining Page 1 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 working days, including the increase in time is now Thirty (30) working days. A Notice to Proceed is pending the completion of street and sidewalk work at the Bonita Creek project adjacent.to this job. This change order shall be considered full compensation for furnishing and installing the materials, labor, tools and equipment, profit, overhead, and all incidentals for performing the work described above. HMS Construction, Inc. will not be entitled to damages or additional payment for delays as described in the 1997 edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, Section 6-6.3, for performing the work as described above. RECOMMENDED FOR PROVAL BY: Alberto APPROVED BY: Mr. c ael High, Pr -' dent HMS Construction, c. weer Dat _4)05_ Dat Mr. Ronald Schneider, Vice esident Dat HMS Construction, Inc. Stephen M. Kirkpatrick, City Engineer Date Page 2 UZ/t5/ZUUS 'I'Ut 15:u1 VAL ibU 141 b156 1t85 construction 6 ,t • .. r I®uu1/uu1 HMS CONSTRUCTION INC. ELECTRICAL & GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR REQUEST FQR_CSANGE ORDER #1 1PAGE of 1 PROJECT 1 SWEETWATER ROAD AND CALMOOR STREET/ FAIRLOMAS ROAD EAST TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION. PER PLANS PROVIDED BY YOU. PER YOUR REQUEST. BTD DATE: February 15, 2005 PHONE 619-336-4386 ATTN: Alberto Griego FAX 619-336-4397 BID ITEMS OUOTED TOTALS 1.) Removal and replacement of the existing block wall and concrete panels at pole location "E" to meet ADA Standards. Complete and in place at. $4,970.00 INCLUDES: TRAFFIC CONTROL, SAWCUTTING, BRICK BLACKS, CONCRETE, ITEMS LISTED ABOVE, LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERTALS. TOTAL THIS QUOTATION: $4,970.00 By use or this estimate it will be attached to the sub -contact as exhibit* 1. This quote, pricing can be held 30 days. THIS FAX IS CONSIDERED PRIVATE MAIL AND MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED TO OTHER PARTIES WITHOUT PERMISSION FROM SENDER. IF YOU RECEIVE THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE CONTACT US IMMEDIATELY. THANK YOU! HMS CONSTRUCTION INC.1225 LINDA VISTA DRIVE, SAN MARCOS, CA. PHONE (760) 736- 3093, FAX (760) 731- 6158, LIC. NO# A, B, C-10-765590 IF YOU SHOULD HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL! THANK YOU, ROBERT JONES ESTIMATOR _ Copy/ to file HMS CONSTRUCTION COST PROPOSAL Con. -act 0415n w.ixoW No.: Date Performed' Work Performed By _HMS CONSTRUCTION Description of Work:. MOVAL OF EXISTING RETAINING WALL AND REPLACING WIT I(F MODIFIED NEW. cots i/ irond REPORT 05 4121 RT _ .��4� R 1 Equip No. EQUIPMENT I ITN ITN TR' V•V UTILITY TRUCK Hours _I Holsty_I t ,. t.t.N Rats Amounts 18.001 22.00 332.0 16.001 22.00J _ 362.001 0 n0.rLe� 0.00 00 0.00 0.00 0.00i 0.00 0. 0.00 0. 0.00 0.00 sunroof..I 704.00 MATERIAL ANDIOR WORK DONE BY SPECIALISTS DESCRIPTION CONCRETE BLOCKS REBAR No. Unit 5 66 1 Unit Cost 100.00 7.37 200.00 Extended 500.00 405.35 200.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL TOTAL COST OF EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS MID WORK 1,105.35 Ateeppx odes t ,rnleiwe Contractor's Represents e ACCEPTED FOR PROGRESS PAYMENT aiWar Resident Engineer AOLt MI6 LIDSRPIIOfiFplCFg117// Resident Engineer e.. LABOROR ,Ip LABOROR SUPERINTENDANT oa Rae u :�1__I 61. Hours I How I Extended I Rate I °units I 1 U.UOI 0.001 16.001 _ 30.001 450.001 0.00 o.00l 16.00, 30.00. 480.001 I 0.001 16.031 720.00 0.901 0.001 1 M 0.00 0.00 11,110 0.00 0.00 nr. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ree.7orPn. 1,68 0A0 Labor Surcharge - (See Special Provisions) Subsistence No. Q $ 3616 604.80 Travel Expense No. $ Other TOTAL COST OF LABOR • 7.75%SALESTAX • 20 %MARKUP ON LABOR COST (SEE CONTRACT) + 15 % MARKUP ONEQUIPMENT + 10 %MARKUP ON SUBCONTRACTED WORK ♦ 1 %BOND AND LIABILITY Y INSURANCE A 2284.80 B 1.809.35 85.66 (A) /(B) (C) SUBTOTAL (D) TOTAL 456.98 28425 4,921.03 49.21 4,970.24 RESOLUTION NO. 2005 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE CHANGE ORDER NO. ONE WITH HMS CONSTRUCTION, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $4,970 FOR REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT OF A BLOCK WALL TO MEET FEDERAL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ("ADA") COMPLIANCE AT THE SWEETWATER ROAD AT CALMOOR STREET AND FAIRLOMAS DRIVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the contract for the Sweetwater Road at Calmoor Street and Fairiomas Drive Traffic Signal Improvement Project was awarded to HMS Construction, Inc. on August 3, 2004, by the adoption of Resolution No. 2004-141; and WHEREAS, there is an existing block wall on the north side of the project where a traffic signal pole will be installed leaving a shortage of space between the wall and the pole for wheelchair access per ADA standards which requires the removal and replacement of the block wall. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the City Engineer to execute Change Order No. 1 with HMS Construction, Inc. in the amount of $4,970 for the removal and replacement of a block wall on the north side of the Sweetwater Road at Calmoor Street and Fairlomas Drive Traffic Signal Improvement Project. PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of December, 2004. Nick Inzunza, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE: May 17, 2005 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 ITEM TITLE: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING THE CLOSURE OF NINTH STREET FROM NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD TO THE WESTERLY SIDE OF THE ALLEY THAT RUNS BETWEEN 8TH STREET AND PLAZA BOULEVARD PREPARED BY: Benjamin Martinez l/" DEPARTMENT Community Development Commission Executive Director EXPLANATION: The purpose of today's meeting is to discuss the closure of Ninth Street from National City Boule- vard to the westerly side of the alley that runs between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. In December 2002, the Community Development Commission approved the third and final phase for the National City Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan concept for the Downtown area. The National City Boulevard Streetscape Master Plan is a comprehensive public improvement project spanning from Chula Vista to the San Diego City limits. The intent of the plan is to implement the following: 1. Create unique "sense of community" areas; 2. Strengthen the economic base of downtown National City with public improvements to support and stimulate new development; and 3. Encourage pedestrian use and enhance the pedestrian experience; and 4. Mitigate the impacts of through traffic. The closure of 9th Street will allow reconstruction of the public right-of-way to create a public plaza. The plaza will include a fountain, new sidewalks, curbs, gutters, irrigated street trees, tree grates, landscaped planters, street fumiture, and street lighting. (continued on next page) .001 Environmental Review X Not applicable. Financial Statement Not applicable. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the City Council authorize the closing of Ninth Street from National City Boulevard to the westerly side of the alley that runs between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) 1. Site Map Resolution No. The California Vehicle Code (Code) allows for the closure of streets by City Council (City) resolution under the following circumstances: (1) When the street is no longer needed for vehicular traffic. (2) Closure during regular school hours for the purpose of conducting driver -training programs. (3) Temporary closure for special events. (4) Closure to implement the circulation element of a general plan. In addition, the Fourth District Court of Appeals determined that a street must not serve a "regionally significant" transportation function. The closure must not infringe upon the rights of other citizens of the greater metropolitan area to travel from community to community. The Community Development Commission of the City of National City is requesting the closure of a portion of Ninth Street. The Community Development Commission has prepared a concept plan to construct certain public improvements. The Community Development Commission has considered all conditions of the proposed concept plan and believes that the street closure is in the best interest of the City and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes. The street closure will implement the circulation element of the General Plan by enhancing pedestrian facilities on National City Boulevard and Ninth Street and does not serve a "regionally significant" function in that, the closure will not infringe upon the rights of other citizens of the greater metropolitan area to travel from community to community. Attached to this report is a Site Map marked as Exhibit "A". SHEET 1 OF 1 'A' STREET 'A' STREET ALLEY BLK 1 LOTS 1-10 IN SUB OF LOT 1, MAP 166 APN 556-471-24 RED LION HOTEL NATIONAL CITY BLVD. SCg1.f 7 xs0, ALLEY BLK 1 LOTS 1-3 IN SUB OF LOT 2, MAP 166 APN 556-471-16 CHAMBER BUILDING PORTION OF 9TH AVENUE VACATED & CLOSED PER 2003-0082074 RES. 2003-3 LEGEND AREA OF PROPOSED STREET CLOSURE EXHIBIT 'A' 12/17/04 RESOLUTION NO. 2005 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CLOSURE OF 9TH STREET` — FROM NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD TO THE WESTERLY SIDE OF THE ALLEY THAT RUNS BETWEEN 8T" STREET AND PLAZA BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Section 21101 et seq. of the Vehicle Code provides a procedure for the closure of public street easements by City Council resolution where the easement is no longer required; and WHEREAS, the Community Development Commission of the City of National City ("CDC") has requested the closure of a portion of 9th Street; and WHEREAS, the CDC is engaged in activities necessary to carry out and implement the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, in oder to carry out and implement the Redevelopment Plan, the CDC requests the closure of 9thStreet from National City Boulevard to the westem side of the alley between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard (Exhibit "A"); and WHEREAS, CDC has prepared design plans to construct certain public improvements; and WHEREAS, the City has duly considered all conditions of the proposed design plans and believes that the street closure is in the best interest of the City and the health, safety, morals and welfare of its residents, and in accord with the public purposes; and WHEREAS, the street closure will implement the circulation element of the General Plan by enhancing pedestrian facilities on National City Boulevard; and WHEREAS, 9th Street does not serve a "regionally significant" function and the closure will not infringe upon the rights of other citizens of the greater metropolitan area to travel from community to community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City as follows: 1. That the portion of 9th Street, as described in the Site Map marked Exhibit "A" on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. , which is by this reference incorporated herein and made a part hereof, is ordered closed. Resolution No. 2005 — May 17, 2005 Page 2 2. That the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution with attached Exhibits, attested by hlm under seal, to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder. PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2005. Nick Inzunza, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Della, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney .FETING DATE April 17, 9005 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ITEM TITLE Resolution Authorizing Execution of Order to Vacate and Close an Unimproved Portion of K Avenue at the End of the Cul-De-Sac North of 13th Street. (Case File No. SC-2004-1) PREPARED BY Martin Reed der 336-4310 DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The council voted to approve this item at the May 3, 2005 public hearing. The attached resolution is necessary to finalize the vacation as required by conditions of approval for Case File No. LS-2001-4. CEnvironmental Review (-Financial Statement N/A X N/A Categorical Exemption >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Resolution Approved By: Finance Director Account No. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution (including Exhibit "A") 2. Order of Vacation 3., Location Map A-200 (9:99) ORDER OF VACATION The City of National City, by authority of Resolution No. duly adopted on May 17, 2005 by the City Council of the City of National City, hereby orders the vacation of the following street within the City limits of National City: An unimproved portion of K Avenue at the end of the cul-de-sac north of 13th Street, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached. Executed this 17th day of May, 2005. NICK INZUNZA, MAYOR MICHAEL R. DALLA, CITY CLERK EXHIBIT "A" That portion of K Avenue as shown on Parcel Map No. 14185 in the City of National City, County of San Diego, State of California, recorded, February 26, 1986 as file no. 86-075313 in book of parcel maps at page 14185, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southwest comer of Parcel 2 according to said Parcel Map No. 14185; thence leaving said Southwest comer of said Parcel 2 Southerly along the centerline of K Avenue, South 17°39'12" East, 9.65 feet to a point on the arc of a 105.50 foot radius curve, concave Southeasterly, a radial line to said point bears North 16°25'24" West; thence Northeasterly along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 4°21'01", an arc length of 8.01 feet to the beginning of a 34.00 foot radius non -tangent curve, concave Southwesterly, a radial line to said point bears North 11° 58'52" West; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curve, through a central angle of 37°46'57 % an arc length of 22.42 feet to point on the Easterly and Northeasterly right-of-way line of K Avenue as shown on said. Parcel Map No. 14185, being also the point on the arc of a 30 foot radius curve, concave Southwesterly, a radial line to said point bears North 51°24'22" East; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve and right-of-way line, through a central angle of 69°03'34", an arch length of 36.16 feet to the point of beginning. PROJECT AREA ZONE BOUNDARY - - - LOCATION MAP Street Vacation for a portion of K Avenue at the end of the cul-de-sac, north of 13th Street SC-2004-1 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 2124/05 INITIAL HEARING 3/21/05 RESOLUTION NO. 2005 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF ORDER TO VACATE AND CLOSE AN UNIMPROVED PORTION OF "K" AVENUE AT THE END OF THE CUL-DE-SAC NORTH OF 13T" STREET APPLICANT: DAVID HARGROVE AND BING MINEVA CASE FILE NO. SC-2004-1 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City adopted Resolution No. 2005-61 on April 5, 2005, declaring its intention to vacate and close an unimproved portion of "K" Avenue at the end of the cul-de-sac north of 13th Street, more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full, excepting therefrom certain public easements, as more particularly described hereafter, in the City of National City, County of San Diego, State of California; and WHEREAS, the City Engineer of the City of National City has caused notice of said vacation and closure to be posted in the manner specified by law; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City has considered the proposed vacation and closure and has found and determined that the said, proposed vacation and closure of an unimproved portion of "K" Avenue at the end of the cul-de-sac north of 13th Street is in conformity with the City's adopted General Plan; and that said portion of public right-of-way is not useful as a nonmotorized transportation facility, as defined in Section 887 of the Streets and Highways Code, and is not needed for present or prospective public use; and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the Planning Commission's report and recommendation and the presentation of staff regarding the proposed vacation and closure; and WHEREAS, all things and acts necessary to be done as required by Part 3 of Division 9 of the Streets and Highways Code in order to abandon said street have been done and accomplished; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on May 3, 2005, at which time all persons interested in or objecting to the proposed vacation and closure were afforded the opportunity to appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the City Council at said hearing, found, from all evidence submitted, that said portion of public right-of-way is unnecessary for present or prospective public street purposes, and is not useful as a nonmotorized transportation facility, as defined in Section 887 of the Califomia Streets and Highways Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council at said hearing further found that vacation and closure of said portion of public right-of-way is in conformity with the adopted General Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED as follows: Resolution No. 2005 — May 17, 2005 Page 2 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are respectively authorized and directed to execute and attest an Order to Vacate the above described portion of public right-of-way reserving and excepting from the vacation an easement to San Diego Gas and Electric for access to and maintenance of existing gas facilities unless such facilities are abandoned to the satisfaction of San Diego Gas and Electric Company. The easement reserved and excepted shall include the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom, together with the right to maintain the said easement free and dear of any excavation or fills, the erection or construction of any building or other structures, the planting of any tree or trees thereon, or the drilling or digging of any well or wells thereon, together with the right to otherwise protect from all hazards the operation and use of any right hereby reserved. Upon written permission of the City, the owners of the underlying fee may utilize the above described parcel of land for structures, approved plantings, the installation of privately owned pipelines, and/or other approved usages. The easement reserved herein is in, under, over, upon, along and across an unimproved portion of "K" Avenue at the end of the cul-de-sac north of 1 3th Street more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 2. That the vacation of the above described portion of public right-of-way is made under the authority of Division 9, Part 3, Chapter 3 of the Streets and Highways Code. 3. That the vacation of the above -described portion of public right-of-way is made to facilitate development of two new single family homes. 4. That the City Clerk Is hereby authorized and directed to cause a certified copy of subject order to be recorded In the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, pursuant to Section 8325 of the Streets and Highways Code. 5. That from and after the date that this Resolution is recorded, the above -described portion of public right-of-way no longer constitutes a street, highway, or public service easement. PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2005. ATTEST: Michael Dalla, City Clerk Nick Inzunza, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney • MEETING DATE May 18, 2005 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 10 AGENDA ITEM NO. (ITEM TITLE Resolution Authorizing Expenditure of Reimbursable Funds in the Amount of $25,504.00 for Mobile Data Terminal Equipment for the Police Department from the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program FY 2004 Grant Fund. PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT ✓' Lt. Craig Boegler Police / Chief Adolfo Gonzales EXPLANATION 336-4433 The Federal Department of Homeland Security's Fiscal Year 2004 Law -Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program provides funding through the County of San Diego's Office of Emergency Services to law enforcement agencies, including the City of National City. The FY 2004 Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program Fund provides law enforcement agencies with funds to enhance their capability to detect, deter, disrupt, and prevent acts of terrorism, to support information sharing to preempt terrorist attacks, and to enhance interoperable communication within the police department. This program requires the City to purchase approved equipment and then apply for reimbursement. In order to be eligible for the reimbursement, the Police Department must order purchase the equipment prior to the October 30, 2005 deadline. Staff recommends the utilization of $25,504.00 of City funds to purchase three laptop computer mobile display terminals for the Police Department and to request reimbursement for such equipment from the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services. The FY04 Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program Fund is a reimbursable grant that requires jurisdictions to order/receive equipment prior to being reimbursed for expenditures. i Environmental Review xY N/A Financial Statement There is no local match required for these funds. There will be no impact to the General Fund. >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A z82- - -oco— o2-wo0 2-g 2 rite- ecr-, • 355-- mo o Account No. CI c -1 Acct. Numbers V.a'hC2- ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) Council Agenda Statement Resolution Authorizing Funds for the Reimbursable Grant Purchase of Equipment for the Police Department from the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program FY 2004 Part II Fund Page 2 Proposal The National City Police Department and Chief Adolfo Gonzales are therefore submitting a request that the City Council authorize the expenditure of $25,504 of City funds to purchase (3) laptop computer mobile data terminals (MDT's), vehicle docking stations, licenses, installation and necessary associated equipment as outlined below. It is requested that a resolution authorizing the expenditures be approved by the City Council. The items of reimbursable equipment are three laptop computer MDT's, three docking stations, three wireless modems, three trunk mount antennas, three licenses, and three mounting solutions. This will enable the Police Department to equip three additional police vehicles with MDT capability, enabling officers to have enhanced mobile field communication by obtaining dispatch call information, accessing local State and Federal databases, providing better communication with other law -enforcement agencies, thus enhancing the police departments commitment to Homeland Security and overall public safety. Expenditures by Item (3) Panasonic Laptop Computers to be used as Mobile Display Terminals, CF-29EW or CF-29EWPGZKM Pentium M 1.3 LV (Centrino), 13.3 Tranmissive Touch XGA, 512 MB, 60 GB,WLAN 802.11b+g, WINXP, with Backlit Keyboard $15, 036.00 (3) Computer MDT's at $5012.00 each $ 1, 165.29 Tax @7.75% Subtotal for Computer MDT's $16,201.29 (3) CF-29 Docking Stations $915.00 (3) Docking Stations at $305.00 each $ 70.91 Tax @ 7.75% Subtotal for Docking Stations $985.91 (3) Sierra Wireless Modems MP775 $3147.00 (3) Wireless Modems at $1,049.99 each $ 243.89 Tax @ 7.75% Subtotal for Wireless Modems $3,390.89 Council Agenda Statement Resolution Authorizing Funds for the Reimbursable Grant Purchase of Equipment for the Police Department from the Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program FY 2004 Part II Fund Page 3 (3) Trunk Mount Antennas $225.00 (3) Trunk Mount Antennas at 75.00 each $ 17.24 Tax @ 7.75% Subtotal for Antennas $242.44 (3) MDC Licenses $880.00 each $2,640.00 (3) MDC Licenses at $880.00 each $ 204.60 Tax @ 7.75% Subtotal for Licenses $2,844.60 (3) Mounting Solutions $1,500.00 (3) Mounting Solutions at $500.00 each $116.25 Tax @ 7.75% Subtotal for Mounting $1,616.25 Grand Total $25,281.38 It is also requested that any funds that are not expended in these purchases can be used to purchase related technology items, software and equipment. RESOLUTION NO. 2005 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF REIMBURSABLE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $25,504 FOR MOBILE DATA TERMINAL EQUIPMENT FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM THE LAW ENFORCEMENT TERRORISM PREVENTION PROGRAM FY 2004 GRANT FUND WHEREAS, the Federal Department of Homeland Security's Fiscal Year 2004 Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Program (the "Program") provides funding through the County of San Diego's Office of Emergency Services to law enforcement agencies to enhance their capability to detect, deter, disrupt and prevent acts of terrorism; to support information sharing to preempt terrorist attacks; and to enhance interoperable communication with the Police Department; and WHEREAS, National City's portion of the grant funds is $25,504; and WHEREAS, the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services is responsible for coordinating the requests for equipment; and WHEREAS, to ensure that the Police Department's equipment is purchased prior to the grant deadline of October 30, 2005, the grant funds must be used to order and/or receive equipment prior to that deadline, to enable staff to claim reimbursement out of the grant funding in a timely manner. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the utilization of $25,504 of City funds to purchase equipment for the Police Department, and directs staff to request reimbursement for such equipment from the San Diego County Office of Emergency Services. PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2005. Nick Inzunza, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE May 17, 2005 11 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of National City awarding a contract to California Commercial Pool in the amount of $991,000, and appropriating $413,327 in funding received via two State.grants ($157,327 Roberti-Z'berg Harris Block Grant & $256,000 Per Capita Grant), for the Renovation Improvement of the National City Municipal Simmink Pool. PREPA tED BY Din Daneshfar D PARTMENT Engineering EXT. LC1R7 EXPLANATION See attached explanation. )F.pvironmental Review X N/A {Financial Statement The award is for $991,000. MIS Approval Approved By: Finance Director The funds are available in the following accounts: 243-409-500-598-4097 ($502,000), 303-409-500-598-4097 ($218,000), 244-409-500-598-4097 ($161,140) 3O11-�/7500-598-4097 y68,500), and through the new appropriated funds ($157,327 $256, u STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. L3. . Resolution . State Grant Award Certificates . Bid Opening Information Sheet A-200 (Rev. 7/03) Re: Resolution of the City Council of National City awarding a contract to California Commercial Pool, in the amount of $991,000, and appropriating $413,327 in funding received via two State grants ($157,327 Roberti-Z'berg Harris Block Grant & $256,000 Per Capita Grant), for the renovation/improvement of the National City Municipal Swimming Pool. Las Palmas Municipal Swimming Pool Facility in Serious Need of Renovation. The City's Municipal Swimming Pool facility was constructed in the 1950's. It consists of an outdoor swimming pool, outdoor activity pool, locker building, and mechanical building. Since its construction, little work has been done to upgrade the facility. Currently, the facility is in a state of deterioration. A summary follows regarding the existing problems with this facility and the proposed renovation schedule. Las Palmas Municipal Swimming Pool Facility is in Violation of State Code. Based on a study conducted by the City's consultant, the Las Palmas Municipal Swimming Pool facility was found to be in violation of various State Health and Safety and Building Codes. Specifically, the following problems exist with the facility: (1) the swimming and activity pool share the same circulation and treatment system (two circulation systems are required by code), (2) the swimming and activity pool's plaster fmish has come loose posing a hazard to users and the circulation and treatment system, (3) adequate handicap accessibility does not exist for the pools, and (4) areas of the pool deck and deck edge are chipping and cracking posing a risk to the public. Las Palmas Municipal Swimming Pool Maintenance Problems Create Burden on City Staff and Resources. Due to its deteriorated state, the Las Palmas Municipal Swimming Pool requires significant maintenance from City staff. Specifically, the following problems exist: (1) the facility fence does not prevent the public from climbing over the fence while the facility is closed —staff must clean up after violators and are concerned about the safety of the violators, (2) some of the original pool piping has leaks, and (3) expansion joints sealant in the pool floors have failed, which has required costly maintenance. Renovation of Las Palmas Municipal Pool Facility will be Completed in Two Phases. Renovation of the Las Palmas Municipal Swimming Pool project will be completed in two major phases. Phase I includes the following activities: (1) renovation of the existing 50-meter swimming pool, (2) construction of a new activity pool, (3) renovation of the plumbing and mechanical systems, (4) renovation of the pool deck, and (5) renovation of the perimeter fencing. Phase I has been designed and bid documents prepared in late 2004. Phase II of the Las Palmas Municipal Swimming Pool Renovation project will consist of the following activities: (1) addition of a water slide, (2) improvements to the parking lot (addition of handicap parking and lighting), (3) renovation of the bathhouse, and (4) addition of an entry kiosk. The design and construction could start in Fiscal Year 2006-07, depending on funding. This report focuses on the activities discussed above in Phase I. Citv Staff Bid Proiect to Begin Process of Renovating Deteriorating Pool Facility — Bids too High. To begin work on renovating the deteriorating facility, the City went out to bid in January of 2005. The intention was to begin construction in March of 2005. The project's bid components (Phase I) are listed below: • Base Bid. Renovation of the 50-meter swimming pool, activity pool, mechanical system. • Additive Alternative I. Reconstruction of the pool deck. • Additive Alternative H. Installation of the perimeter fencing. On February 24, 2005, the City received three bids for this project. The bids, however, came in much higher than estimated. Of the three bids, California Commercial Pool of Glendora, CA, was the lowest bidder. Their bid amounts are listed below: Base Bid $1,496,000 Additive Alternative I $299,000 Additive Alternative II $115,000 Total S1,910,000 Specifically, the base bid, which included the work for the Swimming Pool, activity pool, mechanical system, totaled $1,496,000. The City could not award the contract based upon available funds and all bids were rejected. Rebidding of Project to Obtain Lower Bids Unsuccessful. In an attempt to obtain lower bids for this project, City staff decided to: (1) break the project into four components, (2) rebid the project, and (3) conduct more outreach through expanded advertising and personal calls to contractors. In April of 2005, the City opened the new bids for the project, advertising the following four bid components: • Base Bid. Renovation of the 50-meter swimming pool, plumbing, and mechanical systems. • Additive Alternative I. Construction of a new activity pool. • Additive Alternative II. Reconstruction of the pool deck. • Additive Alternative M. Installation of the perimeter fencing. In addition to rebiding the project, the City purchased $74,673 in equipment in order to utilize State Grant funding that was to expire by the end of April (this equipment will be "owner furnished —contractor installed" as shown in the bid documents). On May 4, 2005, the City received and opened two bids. The first bid was from California Commercial Pool of Glendora, CA. The second bid was from Weir Construction of Escondido, CA. Again, California Commercial Pool was the lowest qualified bidder. They proposed the following bids: Base Bid $991,000 Additive Alternate I $435,000 Additive Alternate II $261,000 Additive Alternate III $123.000 Total $1,810,000 In comparing the initial bid (Base Bid activities only) to the recently received bid for the same activities (Base and Additive Alternative I bids), and the City's purchase of $74,673 in equipment, the total current cost for these items ($1,500,673) has increased by $4,673. Essentially, the City's efforts to rebid the project to obtain a lower bid were unsuccessful ---resulting in an increase in cost to the City. Staff Recommends City Council Award Base and Additive Alternative Bids to Save Money on the Project. Based on the existing project contract, the project should be awarded based on the Base Bid proposal ($991,000). Under this proposal, only the swimming pool, plumbing, and mechanical systems would be renovated. The activity pool (Additive Alternative I), pool deck (Additive Alternative II), and perimeter fencing (Additive Alternative III) would not be addressed continuing to pose safety and maintenance problems for the City. Staff recommends, however, that the contract be awarded to California Commercial Pool based upon the Base and Additive Alternate bids ($1,810,000 plus the additional expenses discussed below). As discussed above, material and labor costs are increasing. The future cost of this project is likely to be significantly higher if the Phase I activities are not completed at the same time. In addition, awarding the contract based on the base and additive bids would allow the City to avoid closing the pool facility multiple times. Swimming activities will be disrupted, however, the public will only have to keep in mind two dates ---the closure date and the reopening date. They will not have services interrupted multiple times or have to keep in mind multiple closing and opening dates. If sufficient funding is unavailable to complete this project as recommended, staff recommends that the City Council approve the work contained in the Base (renovation of pool, plumbing, and mechanical systems) and Additive Alternative I (construction of activity pool) bids. The work included in the Additive Alternative I bid was originally included in the base bid the first time the City bid this project. As discussed above, this work was separated out for the second bid process to attempt to receive a lower bid. Currently, the activity pool is utilized to provide swim lessons for children. In its current state, the pool poses a safety and health hazard to users because of the loose plaster and insufficient treatment and filtration systems. In approving the construction of the activity pool (Additive Alternative I), the City would ensure that children and families using the activity pool have a safe facility in which to learn how to swim. If only the base bid work is performed, the activity pool will be closed thereby not allowing swim lessons. Additional Funding Required to Complete Municipal Swimming Pool Renovation. In addition to the bid costs referenced above, the City must budget for the following expenditures: (1) construction management, inspection, and testing, (2) contingencies, and (3) special inspection. Below, is a summary of the total cost to complete this project with these costs included. Base Bid and Additive Alternative Bids Total $1,810,000 Construction Management, Inspection, and Testing (7%) $127,000 Contingencies (10%) $181 000 Special Inspection $10,000 TOTAL $2,128,000 Including the appropriation of the $413,327 in State grant funding that is recommended in this report; a total of $1,363,104 in funding is available for this project. $764,896 in Funding is Required to Complete Phase I of the Project. To complete the work included in the Base and Additive Alternative bids (Phase I), the City will need to appropriate an additional $764,896 in funding. A FY 2005-06 CIP request for this amount has been submitted by the Engineering Department to the City Council. This funding request is not part of the discussion tonight; however, the City Council will consider it as part of the FY 05-06 Budget package. In order to complete Phase I of the project, as recommended by staff, the FY 2005-06 CIP must be approved. If the City determines that sufficient funding does not exist to complete Phase I, pursuing completion of the Base and Additive Alternative I Bids will require $315,316 in additional funding (as shown below). Base Bid $991,000 Additive Alternate I $435,000 Construction Management, Inspection, and Testing (7%) $99,820 Contingencies (10%) $142,600 Special Inspection $10,000 Total $1,678,420 Project Cost (Base Bid and Additive Alternative I Bid): $1,678,420 Total Funding Available for this Project: $1,363,104 $315,316 State of California • The Resources Agency Arnold Schwarzenegger, Govemor. DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION • P.O. Box 942896 • Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 Ruth Coleman, Director (916) 651-8584 February 09, 2005 Steve Kirkpatrick Assistant Director City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Re: Roberti, Z'berg, Harris, Block Grant Program Contract Number: CO209723 Dear Steve Kirkpatrick: y of hp,T1OW_ CM REC�t� ED Enclosed for your files is a copy of a fully executed contract for the above referenced program. Please refer to your procedural guide for grant process information. As a reminder, your project must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and any other laws and codes relating to individuals with disabilities. If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 651-8584 or e- mail at bbost©parks.ca.gov. Enclosure Sincerely, i.,,,x,,tz, Bill Boston Project Officer t State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION GRANT CONTRACT 2002 Resources Bond Act Roberti-Tberg-Harris Block Grant Program GRANTEE City of National City THE PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD is from July 01, 2003 thru June 30, 2011 The Grantee agrees to the terms and conditions of this Contract, and the State of California, acting through its Director of Parks and Recreation pursuant to the RobertiTberg-Harris Block Grant Program in the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Bond Act of 2002, agrees to fund the Project up to the total State Grant Amount indicated. These funds are for high priority projects that satisfy the most urgent park and recreation needs, with emphasis on unmet needs in the most heavily populated and most economically disadvantaged areas within each jurisdiction. Total State Grant Amount not to exceed $157.327.00 City of National City By (SignaRepresentative) Title City Manager Date The General and Special Provisions attached are made a part of and incorporated into the Contract. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION By Date / //9/a I hereby certify that the Grantee has met, or will meet, ati federal, state and local environmental, public health, relocation, affirmative action,and dearth ,Elhouse requirements and all other appropriate codes, laws and regulations prior to the expenditure of grant funds. (Public Resources Code 5626(d) Signed /- /o-OS (Signed - Legal Counsel for Grantee) CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING (FOR STATE USE ONLY) Date AMOUNT OF ESTIMATE $157,327.00 CONTRACT NUMBER CO209723 FUND. CA CLEAN WATERAIRSAFE ADJ. IhICREASING ENCUMBRANCE $ APPROPRIATION BUDGET ACT - LOCAL ASSISTANCE NGHBORHD PKSCOASTL PROTCT ADJ. DECREASING ENCUMBRANCE $ CALSTARS VENDOR NO. 000000410600 UNENCUMBERED BALANCE $ LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT 3790-101-6029(1)(b) CHAPTER 157 STATUTE 03 FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 T.B.A. NO. B.R.. NO. INDEX. 1091 OBJ. EXPEND 702 PCA. 66011 I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance. SIGNATURE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICERXthei.., O.L16...4:70L . /J DAT�E7�j 4 State of California • The Resources Agency Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor 4• DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION • P.O. Box 942896 • Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 Ruth Coleman, Director (916) 651-7740 April 13, 2005 Steve Kirkpatrick Director of Engineering City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Re: Per Capita Program "0 Contract Number. CO207416 '`•� • cr Dear Steve Kirkpatrick: Enclosed for your files is a copy of a fully executed contract for the above referenced program. Please refer to your procedural guide for grant process information. As a reminder, your project must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and any other laws and codes relating to individuals with disabilities. If you have any questions, please contact me at (916) 651-7740 or e- mail at bwest@parks.ca.gov. Sincerely, Bonnie Morse West Project Officer Enclosure • State of California - The Resources Agency DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION GRANT CONTRACT 2002 Resources Bond Act PER CAPITA GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE City of National City RECE IVE• MAR 2 32005 OF IC OF GRAN, & LOCAL SERVICE$ THE PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD is from July 01, 2003 thru June 30, 2011 The Grantee agrees to the terms and conditions of this Contract, and the State of Califomia, acting through its Director of Parks and Recreation pursuant to the Per Capita Program in the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002, agrees to fund the total Project Grant Amount indicated. THESE FUNDS ARE FOR THE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMUNITY, AND REGIONAL PARKS AND RECREATION LANDS AND FACILITIES. Total State Grant Amount not to exceed $256.000.00 City of National 9fty By (Sftee /Q /i nufBoNzod Representative) Title City Manager Date By Title Date The General and Special Provisions attached are made a part of and incorporated into the Contract. STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION By Date CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING CONTRACT NO 00207416 AMENDMENT NO CALSTARS VENDOR NO. 000300410600 PROJECT NO. AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS DOCUMENT $256,000.00 FUND. CA CLEAN WATERAIRSAFE NGHBORHD PKSCOASTL PROTCT PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR TENS CONTRACT ITEM 3790-101-6029(1Xa) CHAPTER 157 STATUTE 03 FISCAL YEAR 2004/05 TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO DATE S $256,000.00 INDEX. 1091 OBJ. EXPEND 702 PCA. 66010 PROJECT / WORK PHASE T.B.A. NO. I hereby cards/upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance B.R.. NO. ACCOUNTING OFFICER'S S®TURE Dn ego-' DATE. 4//5 %US , BID OPENING SPECIFICATION NUMBER: 04-13 PROJECT TITLE: NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL POOL RENOVATION, FY 2004-05 OPENING DATE: WEDNESDAY, May 4, 2005 TIME: 3:OOPM ESTIMATE: $ 690,000.00 BASE BID PROJECT ENGINEER: STEPHEN KIRKPATRICK AND DIN DANESHFAR NO. BIDDER'S NAME AND ADDRESS (PAGE 12) BASE BID AMOUNT ALTERNATE BID #1 AMOUNT ALTERNATE BID #2 AMOUNT ALTERNATE BID #3 AMOUNT BID SECURITY AND ADDENDA 1. California Commercial Pool 2255 E Auto Centre Dr. Glendora, CA 91740 $991,000.00 $435,000.00 $261,000.00 $123,000.00 X X 2. Weir Construction Corporation 2255 Barham Drive Escondido, CA 92029 $1,224,000.00 $562,400.00 $289,500.00 $195,500.00 X X 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. p yjB N:J, LOIN, 51 P . 6N dY 000,410 P d CALIFOR COMMERCIAL POOLS California Commercial Pools Background and History Califomia Commercial Pools, Inc. is a 25-year old company that specializes in u II types of commercial aquatic facilities. Our broad range of experienrla encompasses all types of projects including, recreational swimming venue:,, competitive aquatic facilities, water play parks, resort pools and fountain: Completing 30 to 40 projects a year translates to several hundred projects in oL twenty-five years of business. As a result of our background and extensiv experience, California Commercial Pools has become the leader in aquati facility construction on the west coast. Organized to adapt to the varying needs of our clients, we are staffed wit competent design professionals, capable estimators, experienced project managers, and seasoned job superintendents. With years of experience we an) flexible in our approach to construction and firm in our commitment to exacting standards and quality. As a result of the number of projects we complet: annually and our associations with recognized aquatic design consultants, wl: are continually on the cutting edge utilizing the latest construction method:, materials, and technologies. Our conservative fiscal management and our measured approach to growth hay!) shaped a stable and confident company, well positioned to dedicate thi: necessary resources to each Individual project. Strong banking and bonding I relationships, comprehensive insurance, and safety programs enhance client confidence. We look forward to putting our experience and resources to work on your project 2255 E. Auto Centre Dr., Glendora, CA 91740 / ph:909.394.1280 fax:909.394.1630 / CAULK. Nc. 4151172 RESOLUTION NO. 2005 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AWARDING A CONTRACT TO CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL POOL IN THE AMOUNT OF $991,000, AND APPROPRIATING $413,327 IN FUNDING RECEIVED VIA TWO STATE GRANTS ($157,327 ROBERTI-Z'BERG HARRIS BLOCK GRANT AND $256,000 PER CAPITA GRANT) FOR THE RENOVATION IMPROVEMENT OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL SWIMMING POOL WHEREAS, the Engineering Department of the City of National City did, in open session on May 4, 2005, publicly open, examine and declare all sealed bids for the Renovation Improvement of the National City Municipal Swimming Pool. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby awards the contract for the Renovation Improvement of the National City Municipal Swimming Pool to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, to wit: CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL POOL BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City a contract between California Commercial Pool and the City of National City for the Renovation Improvement of the National City Municipal Swimming Pool. Said contract is on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves the appropriation of $413,327 in funding received via two State Grants ($157,327 Roberti- Z'berg Hams Block Grant and $256,000 Per Capita Grant) for the Renovation Improvement of the National City Municipal Swimming Pool. PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2005. Nick Inzunza, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 17, 2005 __.FETING DATE ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with Katz Architecture in the amount of $92,500 to design the City Council Chambers remodel/ renovation project, which includes the council chambers and conference rooms, third floor lobby areas and restrooms, and the elevator lobby area PREPARED BY Stephen Kirkpatrick DEPARTMENT Engineering 336-4383 EXPLANATION See attached Explanation AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 J Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement Approved By: $92,500 is available in Account Number 189-409-500-598-1579 for this contract. Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Resolution approving the design contract and authorizing the Mayor to execute the . ntra BOARD / COMMISSION REC raj ENDAT N/A ON ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. L. 1. Resolution 2. Contract katzz A-200 (9:99) EXPLANATION: This project remodels/renovates the City Hall Council chambers, third floor conference rooms, third floor lobby area, the third floor lobby restrooms, and the second and third floor elevator lobby areas. The remodel includes the expansion and reorientation of the City Council Chambers and conference rooms. The lobby will be remodeled to better serve as "overflow" for the Council meetings. An audio-visual system will be installed to better serve those attending the meetings. The system will not only ensure that the amplification and recording of voices is better, but will provide a means for showing visuals in all media format to all in attendance, including those watching from the lobby and conference room. The remodel and the audiovisual system will also contemplate the eventual televising of Council meetings and accommodations will considered to allow such. Attached is a contract with Katz Architecture for the design of the remodel/renovation project. Katz Architecture was selected by the City through the "Request for Qualifications" process to design the fire station project. Katz also designed the Engineering and Human Resources remodel project. Based upon these two successful projects, it my belief that Katz Architecture will design a quality project for the City. Katz Architecture knows that this is a very important project as the Council Chambers, and the ancillary areas, are what most folks see as the center of government for National City. These areas must be inviting and accessible, yet also very professional, with the decorum associated with the important topics discussed and decisions made at the meetings. This project will assist the City in enhancing its image of a "City on the Move." This project has been contemplated for quite some time. Carrier Johnson Architects were involved in a lot of the preliminary work on this project. They did a "needs analysis" interviewing City Council member and City staff, and they developed some conceptual plans that have been presented to City Council. The design concepts presented to Council were approved for further development. Now, due to some process and workload considerations, we are moving to Katz Architecture to complete this project. However, to a large degree Katz will respect the concepts established by Carrier Johnson and approved by City Council - and offer improvements as the ideas are further developed. Attachment B to the contract is a schedule for the design. The schedule shows as the design is further developed, it will be presented to the City Council several times for consideration. Attachment B is a schedule for the design of this project. It shows that design will be complete and the project advertised for bid by November 1, 2005. Bidding the project will require four weeks. It is estimated that after the project is awarded, four weeks will be necessary before construction begins. Construction will require three to four months, meaning project completion by May 1, 2006. The construction schedule is offered for information. As the design is developed and the finishes selected, the workflow of the project will be further refined and the construction schedule will be developed in detail. The budget for this project is estimated at $2.4M dollars. The budget is broken down as follows: Hard Construction Costs $1.4M Audiovisual $0.5M (Poway invested $1M in AV for their new City Hall.) Furniture. $0.25M Design $0.1K Contingency $0.15K Total $2.4K There are several Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) associated with the City Hall that have been budgeted, using general funds, in the past few years. For various reasons these projects have not been implemented but the funding remains. In order to fund this important project, it is recommended that several of these budgeted CIP projects be closed, and the funding be reallocated to this remodel project. This closing of the projects and reallocation of the funds will be the subject of a future Council report after the FY 05/06 budget is complete, but the accounts being considered for possible reallocation are the following: Account Number Project Title Current Balance 196-409-500-598-1397 Civic Center Emergency Generator $85,000 189-409-500-598-1400 Phase 7 Garden Level Remodel $935,572 303-409-500-598-1400 Phase 7 Garden Level Remodel $150,000 189-409-500-598-1569 Basement Refurbishing $5,904.99 189-409-500-598-1575 Civic Center Seismic Upgrade $1,022,881.27 189-409-500-598-1579 Phase 6 City Hall 2nd Floor Remodel $622,995.20 303-409-500-598-4115 Civic Center Beautification Phase 1 $122,474 TOTAL $2,944,827 AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND KATZ ARCHITECTURE THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 17th day of May 2005 by and between the CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, a municipal corporation (the "CITY"), and Katz Architecture (the "CONTRACTOR"). RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY desires to employ a CONTRACTOR to provide professional architectural services. WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that the CONTRACTOR is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the CITY, and the CONTRACTOR is willing to perform such services. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. ENGAGEMENT OF CONTRACTOR. The CITY hereby agrees to engage the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR hereby agrees to perform the services hereinafter set forth in.accordance with all terms and conditions contained herein. The CONTRACTOR represents that all services required hereunder will be performed directly by the CONTRACTOR or under direct supervision of the CONTRACTOR. 2. SCOPE OF SERVICES. The CONTRACTOR will perform services as set forth in attachment A. In summary the CONTRACTOR will design a remodel/renovation of the City hall Council chambers, conference rooms, restrooms, third floor lobby area, and the second and third floor elevator lobby areas. The remodel will include specification an of an audio visual system. Biddable plans and specifications will be prepared and the architect will assist with construction administration. The CONTRACTOR shall be responsible for all research and reviews related to the work and shall not rely on personnel of the CITY for such services, except as authorized in advance by the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall keep CITY staff advised of the progress on the project. The CITY may unilaterally, or upon request from the CONTRACTOR, from time to time reduce or increase the Scope of Services to be performed by the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. Upon doing so, the CITY and the CONTRACTOR agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction or increase in the compensation associated with said change in services. Revised 5/2000 3. PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION. Mr. Stephen Kirkpatrick hereby is designated as the Project Coordinator for the CITY and will monitor the progress and execution of this Agreement. The CONTRACTOR shall assign a single Project Director to provide supervision and have overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this Agreement for the CONTRACTOR. Mr. Jeff Katz thereby is designated as the Project Director for the CONTRACTOR. 4. COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT. The total compensation for the work contemplated in this contract is $89,500. There will be an additional $3,000 allocated for reimbursable expenses. The compensation for the CONTRACTOR shall be based on monthly billings covering actual work performed. Billings will be based upon a percentage of work performed on each phase of the design, and reimbursables, if any. The total cost for all work described in Attachment A shall not exceed the compensation amount above without prior written authorization from the CITY's Project Coordinator. Monthly invoices will be processed for payment and remitted within thirty (30) days from receipt of invoice, provided that work is accomplished consistent with Attachment A as determined by the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall maintain all books, documents, papers, employee time sheets, accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and shall make such materials available at its office at all reasonable times during the term of this Agreement and for three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement, for inspection by the CITY and for furnishing of copies to the CITY, if requested. 5. LENGTH OF AGREEMENT. Completion dates or time durations for specific portions of the Project are set forth in Attachment B. All work required by this contract will be completed by May 1, 2006. 6. DISPOSITION AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. The Memoranda, Reports, Maps, Drawings, Plans, Specifications and other documents prepared by the CONTRACTOR for this Project, whether paper or electronic, shall become the property of the CITY for use with respect to this Project, and shall be turned over to the CITY upon completion of the Project, or any phase thereof, as contemplated by this Agreement. Contemporaneously with the transfer of documents, the CONTRACTOR assigns to the CITY and thereby expressly waives and disclaims, any copyright in, and the right to reproduce, all written material, drawings, plans, specifications or other work prepared under this agreement, except upon the CITY's prior authorization regarding reproduction, which authorization shall not be unreasonably withheld. The CONTRACTOR shall, upon request of the CITY, execute any further document(s) necessary to further effectuate this waiver and disclaimer. The CONTRACTOR agrees that the CITY may use, reuse, alter, reproduce, modify, assign, transfer, or in any other way, medium or method, utilize the CONTRACTOR's written work product for the CITY's purposes, and the CONTRACTOR expressly waives and disclaims any residual rights granted to it by Civil Code Sections 980 through 989 relating to intellectual property and artistic works. 2 Revised 5/2000 The CITY shall hold the CONTRACTOR harmless from any liability arising from any modification or reuse by the CITY of documents, drawings or specifications prepared by the CONTRACTOR, but only with respect to the effect of the modification or reuse by the CITY, or for any liability to the CITY, should the documents be used by the CITY for some project other than what was expressly agreed upon within the Scope of this project, unless otherwise mutually agreed. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Both parties hereto in the performance of this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees, partners or joint venturers with one another. The CONTRACTOR is not an employee of the CITY and is not entitled to any of the rights, benefits, or privileges of the CITY's employees, including but not limited to medical, unemployment, or workers' compensation insurance. This Agreement contemplates the personal services of the CONTRACTOR and the CONTRACTOR's employees, and it is recognized by the parties that a substantial inducement to the CITY for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of the CONTRACTOR and its employees. Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned by the CONTRACTOR without the prior written consent of the CITY. Nothing herein contained is intended to prevent the CONTRACTOR from employing or hiring as many employees, or subcontractors, as the CONTRACTOR may deem necessary for the proper and efficient performance of this Agreement. All agreements by CONTRACTOR with its subcontractor(s) shall require the subcontractor to adhere to the applicable terms of this Agreement. 8. CONTROL. Neither the CITY nor its officers, agents or employees shall have any control over the conduct of the CONTRACTOR or any of the CONTRACTOR's employees except as herein set forth, and the CONTRACTOR expressly agrees not to represent that the CONTRACTOR or the CONTRACTOR's agents, servants, or employees are in any manner agents, servants or employees of the CITY, it being understood that the CONTRACTOR, its agents, servants, and employees are as to the CITY wholly independent contractors and that the CONTRACTOR's obligations to the CITY are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement. 9. COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE LAW. The CONTRACTOR, in the performance of the services to be provided herein, shall comply with all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations, and all applicable ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of National City, whether now in force or subsequently enacted. The CONTRACTOR, and each of its subcontractors, shall obtain and maintain a current City of National City business license prior to and during performance of any work within the City. 10. LICENSES, PERMITS, ETC. The CONTRACTOR represents and covenants that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to practice its profession. The CONTRACTOR represents and covenants that the CONTRACTOR shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, any license, permit, or approval which is legally required for the CONTRACTOR to practice its profession. 11. STANDARD OF CARE. 3 Revised 5/2000 A. The CONTRACTOR, in performing any services under this Agreement, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. The CITY expects that the CONTRACTOR shall take all special precautions necessary to protect the CONTRACTOR's employees and members of the public from risk of harm arising out of the nature of the work and/or the conditions of the work site. B. The CONTRACTOR has had no professional liability judgments made against then related to the professional performance of design services in the last five years. C. The CONTRACTOR is responsible for identifying any unique products, treatments, processes or materials whose availability is critical to the success of the project the CONTRACTOR has been retained to perform, within the time requirements of the CITY, or, when no time is specified, then within a commercially reasonable time. Accordingly, unless the CONTRACTOR has notified the CITY otherwise, the CONTRACTOR warrants that all products, materials, processes or treatments identified in the project documents prepared for the CITY are reasonably commercially available. Any failure by the CONTRACTOR to use due diligence under this sub -paragraph will render the CONTRACTOR liable to the CITY for any increased costs that result from the CITY's later inability to obtain the specified items or any reasonable substitute within a price range that allows for project completion in the time frame specified or, when not specified, then within a commercially reasonable time. 12. NON-DISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS. The CONTRACTOR will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. The CONTRACTOR will take positive action to insure that applicants are employed without regard to their age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. Such action shall include but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation, and selection for training, including apprenticeship. The CONTRACTOR agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause. 13. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. The CITY may from time to time communicate to the CONTRACTOR certain confidential information to enable the CONTRACTOR to effectively perform the services to be provided herein. The CONTRACTOR shall treat all such information as confidential and shall not disclose any part thereof without the prior written consent of the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall limit the use and circulation of such information, even within its own organization, to the extent necessary to perform the services to be provided herein. The foregoing obligation of this Section 13, however, shall not apply to any part of the information that (i) has been disclosed in publicly available sources of information; (ii) is, through no fault of the CONTRACTOR, hereafter disclosed in publicly available sources of information; (iii) is already in the possession of the CONTRACTOR without any obligation of confidentiality; or (iv) has been or is hereafter rightfully disclosed to the CONTRACTOR by a third party, but only to the extent that the use or disclosure thereof has been or is rightfully authorized by that third party. 4 Revised 5/2000 The CONTRACTOR shall not disclose any reports, recommendations, conclusions or other results of the services or the existence of the subject matter of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the CITY. In its performance hereunder, the CONTRACTOR shall comply with all legal obligations it may now or hereafter have respecting the information or other property of any other person, firm or corporation. CONTRACTOR shall be liable to CITY for any damages caused by breach of this condition, pursuant to the provisions of Section 14. 14. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. The CONTRACTOR agrees to indemnify, and hold harmless the City of National City, its officers, employees and volunteers, against and from any and all liability, loss, damages to property, injuries to, or death of any person or persons, costs or attorneys' fees, of any kind or nature, including workers' compensation claims, of or by anyone whomsoever, in any way resulting from or arising out of the CONTRACTOR's negligent performance of this Agreement. 15. WORKERS' COMPENSATION. The CONTRACTOR shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Government Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or Federal acts or laws applicable; and shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY and its officers, employees and volunteers from and against all claims, demands, payments, suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description, including attorney's fees and costs presented, brought or recovered against the CITY or its officers, employees, or volunteers, for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred .by reason of any work to be performed by the CONTRACTOR under this Agreement. 16. INSURANCE. The CONTRACTOR, at its sole cost and expense, shall purchase and maintain, and shall require its subcontractors, when applicable, to purchase and maintain throughout the term of this agreement, the following insurance policies: A. Professional Liability Insurance (errors and omissions) with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence. B. Automobile insurance covering all bodily injury and property damage incurred during the performance of this Agreement, with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident. Such automobile insurance shall include non -owned vehicles. C. Comprehensive general liability insurance, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 combined single limit per occurrence, covering all bodily injury and property damage arising out of its operation under this Agreement. D. Workers' compensation insurance covering all of its employees and volunteers. E. The aforesaid policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the CITY, its officers, employees, and volunteers, so that any other policies held by the CITY shall not contribute to any loss under said insurance. Said policies shall provide for thirty (30) days prior written notice to the CITY of cancellation or material change, ten (10) days for non-payment of premium. 5 Revised 5/2000 F. Said policies, except for the professional liability and worker's compensation policies, shall name the CITY and its officers, agents and employees as additional insureds. G. If required insurance coverage is provided on a "claims made" rather than "occurrence" form, the CONTRACTOR shall maintain such insurance coverage for three years after expiration of the term (and any extensions) of this Agreement. H. Any aggregate insurance limits must apply solely to this Agreement, except professional liability limits. I. Insurance shall be written with only California admitted companies that hold a current policyholder's alphabetic and financial size category rating of not less than A VIII according to the current Best's Key Rating Guide, or a company equal financial stability that is approved by the City's Risk Manager. J. This Agreement shall not take effect until certificate(s) or other sufficient proof that these insurance provisions have been complied with, are filed with and approved by the CITY's Risk Manager. If the CONTRACTOR does not keep all of such insurance policies in full force and effect at all times during the terms of this Agreement, the CITY may elect to treat the failure to maintain the requisite insurance as a breach of this Agreement and terminate the Agreement as provided herein. 17. LEGAL FEES. If any party brings a suit or action against the other party arising from any breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any inaccuracies in any of the representations and warranties on the part of the other party arising out of this Agreement, then in that event, the prevailing party in such action or dispute, whether by final judgment or out -of -court settlement, shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other party all costs and expenses of suit, including attorneys' fees. For purposes of determining who is to be considered the prevailing party, it is stipulated that attorney's fees incurred in the prosecution or defense of the action or suit shall not be considered in determining the amount of the judgment or award. Attorney's fees to the prevailing party if other than the CITY shall, in addition, be limited to the amount of attorney's fees incurred by the CITY in its prosecution or defense of the action, irrespective of the actual amount of attorney's fees incurred by the prevailing party. 18. MEDIATION/ARBITRATION. If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the parties agree first to try, in good faith, to settle the dispute by mediation in San Diego, California, in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association (the "AAA") before resorting to arbitration. The costs of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties. Any controversy or claim arising out of, or relating to, this Agreement, or breach thereof, which is not resolved by mediation shall be settled by arbitration in San Diego, California, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the AAA then existing. Any award rendered shall be final and conclusive upon the parties, and a judgment thereon may be entered in any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy. The expenses of the arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties to the 6 Revised 5/2000 arbitration, provided that each party shall pay for and bear the costs of its own experts, evidence and attorneys' fees, except that the arbitrator may assess such expenses or any part thereof against a specified party as part of the arbitration award. 19. TERMINATION. A. This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by the CITY. Termination without cause shall be effective only upon 60-day written notice to the CONTRACTOR. During said 60-day period the CONTRACTOR shall perform all services in accordance with this Agreement. B. This Agreement may also be terminated immediately by the CITY for cause in the event of a material breach of this Agreement, misrepresentation by the CONTRACTOR in connection with the formation of this Agreement or the performance of services, or the failure to perform services as directed by the CITY. C. Termination with or without cause shall be effected by delivery of written Notice of Termination to the CONTRACTOR as provided for herein. D. In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished Memoranda Reports, Maps, Drawings, Plans, Specifications and other documents prepared by the CONTRACTOR, whether paper or electronic, shall immediately become the property of and be delivered to the CITY, and the CONTRACTOR shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of the Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused the CITY by the CONTRACTOR's breach, if any. Thereafter, ownership of said written material shall vest in the CITY all rights set forth in Section 6. E. The CITY further reserves the right to immediately terminate this Agreement upon: (1) the filing of a petition in bankruptcy affecting the CONTRACTOR; (2) a reorganization of the CONTRACTOR for the benefit of creditors; or (3) a business reorganization, change in business name or change in business status of the CONTRACTOR. 20. NOTICES. All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered; or sent by overnight mail (Federal Express or the like); or sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested; or sent by ordinary mail, postage prepaid; or telegraphed or cabled; or delivered or sent by telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax; and shall be deemed received upon the earlier of (i) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice, (ii) if sent by overnight mail, the business day following its deposit in such overnight mail facility, (iii) if mailed by registered, certified or ordinary mail, five (5) days (ten (10) days if the address is outside the State of California) after the date of deposit in a post office, mailbox, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service, (iv) if given by telegraph or cable, when delivered to the telegraph company with charges prepaid, or (v) if given by telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax, when sent. Any notice, request, demand, direction or other communication delivered or sent as specified above shall be directed to the following persons: To the CITY: Mr. Chris Zapata City Manager City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard ? Revised 5/2000 National City, CA 91950 To the CONTRACTOR: Mr. Jeff Katz Owner Katz Architecture 7290 Navajo Road San Diego, California, 92119 Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner specified in this Section. Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice, demand, request or communication sent. Any notice, request, demand, direction or other communication sent by cable, telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax must be confirmed within forty-eight (48) hours by letter mailed or delivered as specified in this Section. 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND POLITICAL REFORM ACT OBLIGATIONS. During the term of this Agreement, the CONTRACTOR shall not perform services of any kind for any person or entity whose interests conflict in any way with those of the City of National City. The CONTRACTOR also agrees not to specify any product, treatment, process or material for the project in which the CONTRACTOR has a material financial interest, either direct or indirect, without first notifying the CITY of that fact. The CONTRACTOR shall at all times comply with the terms of the Political Reform Act and the National City Conflict of Interest Code. The CONTRACTOR shall immediately disqualify itself and shall not use its official position to influence in any way any matter coming before the CITY in which the CONTRACTOR has a financial interest as defined in Government Code Section 87103. The CONTRACTOR represents that it has no knowledge of any financial interests that would require it to disqualify itself from any matter on which it might perform services for the CITY. The CONTRACTOR shall be strictly liable to the CITY for all damages, costs or expenses the CITY may suffer by virtue of any violation of this Paragraph 21 by the CONTRACTOR. 22. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Computation of Time Periods. If any date or time period provided for in this Agreement is or ends on a Saturday, Sunday or federal, state or legal holiday, then such date shall automatically be extended until 5:00 p.m. Pacific Time of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or federal, state or legal holiday. B. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which, together, shall constitute but one and the same instrument. C. Captions. Any captions to, or headings of, the sections or subsections of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties hereto, are not a part of this Agreement, and shall not be used for the interpretation or determination of the validity of this Agreement or any provision hereof. 8 Revised 5/2000 D. No Obligations to Third Parties. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon, or obligate any of the parties hereto, to any person or entity other than the parties hereto. E. Exhibits and Schedules. The Exhibits and Schedules attached hereto are hereby incorporated herein by this reference for all purposes. F. Amendment to this Agreement. The terms of this Agreement may not be modified or amended except by an instrument in writing executed by each of the parties hereto. G. Waiver. The waiver or failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any future breach of any such provision or any other provision hereof. H. Applicable Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. I. Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreements, negotiations and communications, oral or written, and contains the entire agreement between the parties as to the subject matter hereof. No subsequent agreement, representation, or promise made by either party hereto, or by or to an employee, officer, agent or representative of any party hereto shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby. J. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. K. Construction. The parties acknowledge and agree that (i) each party is of equal bargaining strength, (ii) each party has actively participated in the drafting, preparation and negotiation of this Agreement, (iii) each such party has consulted with or has had the opportunity to consult with its own, independent counsel and such other professional advisors as such party has deemed appropriate, relative to any and all matters contemplated under this Agreement, (iv) each party and such party's counsel and advisors have reviewed this Agreement, (v) each party has agreed to enter into this Agreement following such review and the rendering of such advice, and (vi) any rule or construction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement, or any portions hereof, or any amendments hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY By: Nick Inzunza, Mayor CONTRACTOR By: Jeff Katz, Sole Proprietor, Katz Architecture 9 Revised 5/2000 Jeff Katz Architecture May 4, 2005 Mr. Stephen M. Kirkpatrick City Engineer The City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 RE: Architectural Services National City Council Chamber Remodel Revised Scope of Work and Fee Proposal Dear Steve: Based on our meetings to discuss this project and your comments on my proposal dated May 1, 2005, I have prepared the following fee proposal for the renovation to the existing second floor Council Chambers and adjacent conference rooms (approximately 4,000 square feet). Work will be based on the schematic design concepts prepared previously and will include relocation of existing walls, replacement of existing ceilings and light fixtures, modifications to the existing HVAC, new wall and floor finishes, coordination of new furniture systems layout. Work will also include design of audio-visual systems forthe Council Chamber and front lobby. Additional finishes modifications will be designed to the ground floor building lobby, stairwell and elevator cab. At this time it is anticipated that the construction cost (hard dollar) forthe planned improvements will be $1,400,000. An additional budget of $500,000 each is anticipated forthe audio-visual and furniture systems (total project budget of $2,400,000). We are proposing to offer the following scope of services: SCHEMATIC DESIGN PHASE Prepare as -built drawings of existing conditions. Refine preliminary space plans indicating proposed furniture layouts, etc. Perform preliminary code review and meet with Building Department as necessary to discuss the proposed modifications. 7290 Navajo Road, Suite 186 • Sap Diego, California 92119 (619) 698-9177 • Fax (619) 698-9178 National City Council Chamber Remodel May 4, 2005 Page 2 Perform Lead and Asbestos survey by qualified Industrial Hygienist to determine the existence of both lead and asbestos containing materials in the existing structure. Develop preliminary elevations of proposed casework, including custom designed reception desk and council dais. Develop color board for proposed finishes. Work with fumiture vendor to layout fumiture Develop Preliminary Audio -Visual component design package. For the purpose of this proposal assume 3 meetings with Council and staff to present and discuss potential systems. Review layouts and finish selections with City. For the purpose of this proposal assume 3 meetings with Council and staff. After obtaining written approval of Schematic Design we will proceed into Construction Documents. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS PHASE Prepare drawings and specifications suitable for bidding to clearly delineate the Contractors scope of work, including required architectural mechanical and electrical design. The Audio -Visual component design package will also be provided. No structural modifications are anticipated or included as part of this proposal. It is assumed for this proposal that the City of National City will provide all required General and Supplementary Conditions and Bidding Information. Plans and specifications to indicate locations of identified lead and asbestos containing materials and appropriate specification procedures for removing such material. Submit plans to City of National City Building Department for plan check, and perform all required revisions to construction documents based on Building Department's plan check comments (Note: plan check and permit fees are not included). Meet with City of National City as required to review final design and construction documents. For the purpose of this proposal assume 3 meetings with Council and staff. Jeff Kate Architecture • 7290 Navajo Road, Suite 106 • San Diego, California 92119 (619) 698-9177 • Fax (619) 698-9178 National City Council Chamber Remodel May 4, 2005 Page 3 BIDDING PHASE Provide final original drawings and specifications for use in bid packages. For this proposal it is assumed that the City of National City will advertise, assemble and distribute bid packages. Interpret and clarify contract documents for contractors, and assist in issuing addenda as required. Attend a Pre -Bid walkthru at the site with all interested contractors. Participate in bid opening, review contractor's detailed cost breakdown, and assist the City of National City in evaluation of the bids. CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION PHASE Construction contract administration services are based on a Three month construction period, from Authorization to Proceed through Punchlist Inspection. The following services will be provided: Attend Pre -Construction conference. Review and approve or take other appropriate action upon Contractor's submittals and shop drawings as required by contract documents. Interpret contract documents (including all subconsultant disciplines) for proper execution and progress of construction, including responding to contractor's requests for information and clarification. Make one scheduled site visit every week during the course of construction (total of 12) to observe the project, and prepare site visit report. Site visit shall include meeting with contractor and City representative to review progress of construction, review pending RFI and Change Order information, and observe the construction to verify work is proceeding in accordance with construction documents. Make one additional site visit to perform Punchlist Inspection, and one additional visit to perform Final Inspection. Punchlist Inspection will include a detailed listing of all items remaining to be completed by the Contractor. Final Inspection will certify that all work has been completed in accordance with construction documents. Assist in reviewing and processing contractor's progress payment requests, and certifying the amounts due to the Contractor. Jeff Katz Architecture • 7290 Navajo Road, Suite 106 • San Diego, California 92119 (619) 699-9177 • Fax (619) 692-9178 • National City Council Chamber Remodel May 4, 2005 Page 4 ADDITIONAL SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED ON AN HOURLY BASIS The following items are not included in the Basic Services, and will be provided as additional services only after written authorization is received. Unless a subsequent fixed fee proposal is provided, the work will be done on an hourly basis per the attached Hourly Rate Schedule (Exhibit 'A'). Revisions to Schematic Design or Contract Documents resulting from Owner requested changes to documents previously approved by the Owner, or due to code or zoning changes made subsequent to Owner approval. Services required because of significant changes in the project (not due to the design team's acts or omissions) including, but not limited to, size, quality, complexity, schedule, or the method for bidding and contracting for construction. Construction site visits provided in excess of the visits defined under the Construction Administration Phase which are requested by the City, or made necessary through delays in the construction schedule or other elements outside the control of the Architect (for either Architect or subconsultant engineers). Plan check and permit fees (if paid by the consultant) will be a reimbursable expense, charged at 1.1 times the Consultant's cost. All delivery, printing and reproduction costs will be a reimbursable expense, charged at 1.1 times the Consultant's cost. I propose to provide the stated basic services for a fixed fee of Eighty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($89,500.00). Invoices will be submitted monthly, in a format acceptable to the City, for the percentage of work completed during the month, on any particular phase. I am available to meet with you at any time to review and discuss the proposed scope of services and fee proposal. If you have any questions regarding this scope of work please do not hesitate to contact me at (619) 698-9177. Re ectfully, Jeff Katz, Al Principal Jeff Katz Architecture • 7290 Navajo Road, Suite 106 • Su Diego, California 92119 (619) 6989177 • Fax (619) 698-9178 • Exhibit "A" HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE The following rates apply to work performed on an hourly basis. Principal Architect $ 120.00 per hour Project Manager $ 95.00 per hour Specification Writer $ 90.00 per hour Construction Administrator $ 100.00 per hour Drafter $ 65.00 per hour Secretarial $ 40.00 per hour Structural Engineer $ 140.00 per hour Civil Engineer $ 120.00 per hour Mechanical Engineer $ 115.00 per hour Electrical Engineer $ 125.00 per hour Landscape Architect $ 100.00 per hour Reimbursable Expenses will be charged at 1.1 times the direct cost. Note: These rates will remain in effect until December 31, 2005, at which time they may be adjusted as a result of salary reviews. Jeff Katz Architecture • 7290 Navajo Road, Suite 106 • San Diego, California 92119 (619) 698.9177 • Fax (619) 698-9178 ID Task Name 1 Authorization to Proceed 2 Schematic Design Phase 3 Prepare As -Built Drawings 4 Order Lead and Asbestos Survey 5 Review previous designs & correspondenoe 6 Develop Preliminary Floor Plans 7 Develop Preliminary elevations 8 AV Meeting with Council Start May i June Julyl August jSeptemberOtober November Finish 1 :8 :152229: 5112119261311011712413117 '142128 4 11 18 25 2 9 116 23 3016 113120:27 Wed 5/18/05 Wed 5/18/05 6,118 Thu 5/19/05 Tue 8/9/05 Thu 5/19/05 Mon 5/23/05 1 Ul Thu 5/19/05 Wed 6/1/05 Thu 5/19/05 Mon 5/23/05 Tue 5/24/05 Mon 6/6/05 Mon 5/30/05 Fri 6/10/05 Tue 6/7/05 Mon 6/27/05 9 Meet with Council to review proposed design 10 Finalize revised schematic design 11 Develop Color/Material Boards 12 Meet with Council to Confirm Design/Color/Material 13 Authorization to Proceed with Con Docs 14 Construction Documents Phase 15 Base sheets to consultants 16 60% Plans to JKA • Mon 6/13/05 Fri 7/1/05 ' Wed 7/6/05 Tue 7/19/05 ": Mon 7/11/05 Tue 7/19/05 Wed 7/20/05 Tue 8/9/05 Tue 8/9/05 Tue 82/05 Fri 8/12105 Thu 11/10105 Fri 8/12/05 Fri 8/12/05 Fri 9/2105 Fri 9/2/05 r 17 Submit 60% plans to City for review 18 City Review of 60% Submittal 19 City retum comments to JKA 20 JKA Markups to consultants 21 90% plans to JKA 22 Specifications to JKA 23 Submit to Building Department 24 Building Department Review Tue 9/6/05 Wed 9/7/05 Tue 9/20/05 Thu 922/05 Thu 10/13/05 Thu 10/13/05 Fri 10/14/05 Mon 10/17/05 Tue 9/6/05 Tue 9/20/05 Tue 9/20/05 Thu 9/22/05 Thu 10/13/05 Thu 10/13/05 Fri 10/14/05 Tue 10/25/05 25 Comments and Redmarks to Consultants 26 Final plans to JKA 27 Anal Specifications to JKA 28 Resubmit to Building Department 29 Plans ready for permitting 30 Plans Out to Bid Project National City COuncil Chambr Date: Wed 514/05 Thu 10/27/05 Thu 11/3/05 Thu 11/3/05 Mon 11/7/05 Thu 11/10/05 Fri 11/11/05 Thu 10/27/05 Thu 11/3/05 Thu 11/3/05 Mon 11/7/05 Thu 11/10/05 Fri 11/11/05 1 1 El 8/9 410 8112 4* 912 Sp 9/6 4* 9120 4* 922 4k 10113 41, 10/13 4* 10/14 4* El 10/27 ip tin • lin • iir7 • 11110 • 11111 • Task Split Progress 1111.11111111111101111111111.11111111 Milestone Summary Project Summary • Illp=111N11111. 9111M1.0111N19 External Tasks External Milestone 41, Deadline National City Council Chamber Remodel Proposed Design Schedule RESOLUTION NO. 2005 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH KATZ ARCHITECTURE IN THE AMOUNT OF $92,500 TO PROVIDE ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS REMODEURENOVATION PROJECT WHEREAS, the City desires to employ a contractor to provide architectural services for the City Council Chambers Remodel/Renovation Project, which includes the Council Chambers, conference rooms, third floor lobby area, the third floor lobby restrooms, and the second and third floor elevator lobby areas; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that Katz Architecture is an architectural firm and is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the City, and Katz Architecture is willing to perform such services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute on behalf of the City an agreement with Katz Architecture to provide architectural services for the City Council Chambers Remodel/Renovation Project, which includes the Council Chambers, conference rooms, third floor lobby area, the third floor lobby restrooms, and the second and third floor elevator lobby areas. Said Agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 17th day of May, 2005. Nick Inzunza, Mayor ATTEST: Michael Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 17, 2005 -_.FETING DATE AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 /'ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City to allocate $150,000 of General Fund Reserves from account number 001-2401 to be used for the immediate removal of the underground fuel storage tanks at the Police Station Headquarters and the Public Works Yard. PREPARED BY XPLANATION Jim Dredge 336-4580 DEPARTMENT Public Works See Attached Explanation. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Funding is available in the General Fund Reserved Account No. 001-2401 Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Resolution No. JIM2 A-200 (9/80) RE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City to allocate $150,000 of General Fund Reserves from account number 001-2401 to be used for the immediate removal of the underground fuel storage tanks at the Public Works Yard and the Police Station. EXPLANATION The City owns seven non -operating underground fuel storage tanks. Six of the tanks are located in the Public Works Yard, and one of the tanks is located at the Police Station. Four of the tanks have been closed for years, and three of the tanks were closed on January 15, 2004. The three recently closed fuel tanks are the tanks at the Public Works yard; a 1,500-gallon gasoline tank and a 5,000-gallon diesel tank, and a 500-gallon diesel tank at the Police Station used for the emergency generator. These tanks were closed due to the fact that they did not meet the current standard for secondary containment of the piping and sump system. Police Headquarters UST: This UST is a 500-gallon diesel tank, which was used to power an emergency generator and was installed when the Police Headquarters was built in 1992. At that time, the City did remove a 500- gallon gasoline UST that was perforated. This tank was an abandoned tank left by a previous property owner. The tank was discovered during excavation for the new facility. The County's Department of Environmental Health (DEH) required the City to clean and monitor the site. Since then, the City has worked with DEH to comply and on April 20, 2004, hired Environmental Business Solutions (EBS) to continue to conduct environmental site assessment, groundwater monitoring, preparation of permits and clean-up grout requests dealing with the removed tank. Public Works Yard USTs: There are six USTs at this site, a 1,500-gallon gasoline and a 5,000 diesel that were temporarily closed at the beginning of 2004 as well as four other tanks that have been "closed" in their current locations which are under DEH oversight. The USTs at the Public Works site have been monitored since 1987, when contamination was detected. Conclusion/Recommendation: The groundwater around these tanks has been monitored, in conjunction with the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health, since at least 1987. The City is required to remove underground tanks if they are no longer needed. Working with the DEH, the plan was to "close" the tanks according to the DEH standards, continue monitoring of the groundwater around the tanks, and finally remove the tanks when the yard was moved or renovated. This plan was less disruptive to the operation of the yard, which was/is also the temporary location of the Fire Station. It was also thought that an "economy of scale" could be achieved by having the removal occur as part of a large grading operation that would occur as part of the remodel. The County DEH is requiring the tanks be removed as soon as possible. In fact, the County DEH is now stating the tanks must be removed promptly, and that further inaction could result in significant monetary penalties. It is now time to disassociate the removal of the tanks project from the Public Works Yard project. The Assistant City Manager has been in personal contact with the Department of Environmental Health Staff. At the encouragement of Mr. John Kolb at DEH, Ms. Wurbs recommends the work be put out to bid to achieve the most competitive price by the most highly qualified business. The funding is available in General Fund Reserve account 001-2401. We will seek reimbursement funding and any special grants, but at his time request the Councils upfront commitment of general funds to allow for the removal of the tanks. Staff recommends the City Council allocate $150,000 of General Fund Reserves from account number 001-2401 to be used for the immediate removal of the underground fuel storage tanks at the Public Works Yard and Police Station. .dEETING DATE May 17, 2005 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 14 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #41 PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Finance EXPLANATION Finance Park Morse 619-336-4330 Ratification of Warrant Register #41 per Government Section Code 37208. CEnvironmental Review Financial Statement Not applicable. >STAFF RECOMMENDATION N/A Approved By: Finance rector Account No. I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $ 606,816.47. BOARD / COMMIS ION END. TION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Warrant Register #41 2. Workers Comp Warrant Register dated 04/13/05 A-200 (9;99) Payee MICHAELS STORES INC. POINT LOMA CAMERA UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO WESTFLEX INDUSTRIAL CSMFO SAN DIEGO CHAPTER LOPEZ AMAZON.COM CREDIT BAKER & TAYLOR BOWKER BRODART 3USINESS COMMUNICATIONS INC CALIFA GROUP CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOC. DELL MARKETING CORP DYNIX INC. FEDEX JANIE ANDERSON, CFRE MIDWEST TAPE NATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT NOLO PRESS, INC. NOLO PRESS -OCCIDENTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES PLUS OMNIGRAPHICS, INC. QUILL CORPORATION RESEARCH ASSOCIATES OF ,ERRA COOPERATIVE LIBRARY City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Description chk no chk date amount FRAMING CONSISTING OF:- 200104 4/19/05 2,731.30 SCANS. PHOTO REPRODUCTION FOR NEW FI200105 4/19/05 616.04 ADVERTISING ARTIST-RFO 200106 4/19/05 336.00 ASSEMBLY 50' 3/8" GOODYEAR RED HORIZO1`200107 4/19/05 226.14 CSMFO LUNCHEON MEETING 4/14/05-6 PEOPI200409 4/14/05 150.00 REFUND OF SEWER SRVC CHRG OVRPMNT 200410 4/14/05 257.28 BOOKS BOOKS BOOKS MATERIALS & SUPPLIES BOOKS CONTRACT SERVICES MEMBERSHIPS AND SUBSCRIPTIONS COMPUTER EQUIPMENT CONTRACT SERVICES(CAPITAL OUTLAY) POSTAGE CONTRACT SERVICES(CAPITAL OUTLAY) PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES PRINTING AND BINDING BOOKS BOOKS OFFICE SUPPLIES BOOKS OFFICE SUPPLIES BOOKS SERRA COOPERATIVE LIBRARY SYSTEM* 200430 200411 4/19/05 358.84 200412 4/19/05 1,421.96 200413 4/19/05 252.44 200414 4/19/05 992.07 200415 4/19/05 29.95 200416 4/19/05 400.00 200417 4/19/05 120.00 200418 4/19/05 1,244.12 200419 4/19/05 21,904.50 200420 4/19/05 37.06 200421 4/19/05 3,000.00 200422 4/19/05 314.10 200423 4/19/05 114.66 200424 4/19/05 141.58 200425 4/19/05 31.88 200426 4/19/05 95.09 200427 4/19/05 111.70 200428 4/19/05 63.03 200429 4/19/05 25.00 4/19/05 3.00 1 Payee THE H.W. WILSON COMPANY THE VIDEO STORE SHOPPER THOMSON GALE U.S. POSTMASTER ALTA BOOK CENTER ALTON AMAZON.COM CREDIT ARCHER BAUTISTA BELL BOOKPOWER BROWNLEE CARLA CAMPBELL LEHN CARRILLO CINGULAR WIRELESS CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CITY OF SAN DIEGO CLARK COPIER SOLUTIONS DEERING DELANEY EDUCATIONAL DISCOUNT SCHOOL SUPPLY DODD EDC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES EDWARDS ESTREICHER FARNSWORTH BOOKS City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Description BOOKS PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES BOOKS POSTAGE BOOKS (ELLI) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) BOOKS (ELLI) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) POSTAGE (LIT. SVCS. Y-2) BOOKS (ELLI) EXPERT SVCS/TRAVEL (AMER/CNCS Y-2) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. )(III) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (WOW) TELEPHONE (ELLI) TAXES (ELLI) EXPERT SERVICES (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) EXPERT SERVICES/POSTAGE (E.V.G.) chk no 200431 200432 200433 200434 200435 200436 200437 200438 200439. 200440 200441 200442 200443 200444 200445 200446 200447 200448 PRINTING & BINDING (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-200449 TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) BOOKS (ELLI) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) BOOKS (ELLI) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES (LIT. SVCS. Y-2) 200450 200451 200452 200453 200454 200455 200456 200457 chk date 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 amount 146.00 298.88 662.07 444.00 389.74 59.50 261.23 11.00 71.74 3.38 3,438.00 74.75 918.64 8.91 66.14 322.68 350.00 730.14 1,160.14 189.27 967.06 7,944.21 51.12 961.51 25.84 15.00 1,827.50 2 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Payee Description FENCL FERGUSON TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) FLEISHMAN TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) FRANCES WILLIAMS HOUSER OFFICE SUPPLIES (LIT. INIT. XIII) GRIFFIN TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) HARPER TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) HARTZ TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) HOLCOMB TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) JONES TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) KRISTAPONIS TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) LAKESHORE LEARNING MATERIAL MATERAILS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) LINGUI SYSTEMS, INC. ',LOYD LOUISIANA ENDOWMENT FOR LYNNE PRICE MCCHRISTIAN MINDSET SOFTWARE INC. MINDWARE NEW READERS PRESS NINNIS O'HARA OFFICE SUPPLIES PLUS PIMENTEL PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORP QUALITY BOOKS INC. QUILL CORPORATION RAMOS 'ANDALL WEAVER BOOKS (ELLI) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) TRAVEL (PRIME TIME) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) CONTRACT SERVICES (LIT. INIT. XIII) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES (LIT. SVCS. Y-2) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) OFFICE SUPPLIES (LIT. SVCS. Y-2) BOOKS (WOW) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) TRAVEL (LIT. INIT. XIII) 1.1.11.21 chk date amount 200458 4/19/05 85.48 200459 4/19/05 114.06 200460 4/19/05 4.30 200461 4/19/05 267.24 200462 4/19/05 40.80 200463 4/19/05 115.94 200464 4/19/05 21.49 200465 4/19/05 324.41 200466 4/19/05 90.09 200467 4/19/05 438.86 200468 4/19/05 2,514.60 200469 4/19/05 140.08 200470 4/19/05 4,250.00 200471 4/19/05 65.81 200472 4/19/05 110.16 200473 4/19/05 1,404.00 200474 4/19/05 509.26 200475 4/19/05 168.00 200476 4/19/05 273.36 200477 . 4/19/05 2,585.70 200478 4/19/05 552.50 200479 4/19/05 59.16 200480 4/19/05 82.66 200481 4/19/05 430.80 200482 4/19/05 99.09 200483 4/19/05 32.64 200484 4/19/05 110.34 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Payee REALLY GOOD STUFF, INC. ROBINSON ROSS RUTH SCHOLASTIC LIBRARY PUBLISHIN SCHOOL -AGE NOTES, INC. SMART & FINAL Description MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) BOOKS (ELLI) BOOKS (ELLI) SMILE MAKERS MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) SOCIAL STUDIES SCHOOL SERVICE BOOKS (ELLI) SORENSEN SPRINT STRATEGIC RESOURCE COMPANY SUAREZ TEACHER CREATED RESOURCES TEACHING STUFF INC. TORRES TROUSDALE TWIN GRAPHICS WONG ACFEI AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES BDS ENGINEERING INC BOND BLACKTOP, INC. BUTLERS MILL, INC. CAPF CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT CAPITOL ENQUIRY INC chk no. chk date 200485 4/19/05 200486 4/19/05 200487 200488 200489 200490 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPLIES (LIT. SVCS. Y-2) 200491 4/19/05 200492 4/19/05 200493 4/19/05 200494 4/19/05 200495 4/19/05 00496 4/19/05 200497 4/19/05 200498 4/19/05 200499 4/19/05 200500 4/19/05 200501 4/19/05 200502 4/19/05 EXPERT SERVICES (AMERICORPS/CNCS Y-2) 20.0503 4/19/05 MEMBERSHIP/DONALD CONDON 200504 4/19/05 SUSPECT BLOOD WITHDRAWALS, URINE TES200505 4/19/05 SRVCS FROM 2/1-22/05 PUMP STATION UPGRJ200506 4/19/05 RETENTION -NC SLURRY SEAL PROJECT 200507 4/19/05 TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) TELEPHONE (ELLI) EXPERT SERVICES (AMERICORPS/CNCS Y-2) 2 TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (ELLI) BOOKS (ELLI) TRAVEL (PRIME TIME) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS/LSTA Y-2) MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (WOW) TRIPLE PRO 15-15-15 FERTILIZER FIRE/LTD APR 2005 PD/TD APR 2005 CAPITOL ENQUIRY 200508 4/19/05 200509 4/19/05 200510 4/19/05 200511 4/19/05 amount 388.08 64.60 49.20 8.98 46.29 383.35 111.92 101.80 82.53 11.90 60.81 7,588.36 132.83 2,382.75 486.34 17.85 75.14 85.04 42.00 514.95 1,172.00 14,887.50 20,373.04 1,345.95 640.00 1,716.00 61.41 4 Payee CINGULAR WIRELESS CINGULAR WIRELESS CINGULAR WIRELESS CITY OF SAN DIEGO CODE3 COMMUNICATIONS COMPETITIVE EDGE RESEARCH CORPORATE EXPRESS DIXIELINE LUMBER CO. DOKKEN ENGINEERING DURRA INK EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION `iNVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS 'ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COALI EW TRUCK & EQUIPMENT CO. INC. EXPERIAN FEDEX KINKO'S FIRE INSTRUCTOR TESTING FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY FLEETPRIDE FLOWERS 4 YOU FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO GALLS, INC. HEALTH NET HEALTH NET HEALTH NET HUSSONG TRANSLATIONS & -INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL I City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Description WIRELESS SRVC #0045518590 WIRELESS SRVC #113782899 WIRELESS SRVC #043-70006473 ARJIS MISC CHRGS 10/11/04-1/30/05 RADIO SERVICE ON THE NEW PIERCE POLL BRIEFINGS & MEETINGS MOP 45704-MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES LUMBER chk no 200512 200513 200514 200515 pUMpE 200516 200517 200518 200519 1/1/05-2/28/05 SRVCS-PLAZA BLVD WIDENING200520 18,500 APRIL NEWSLETTERS SRVC FOR CLEAN UP EVENT 3/19/05 200521 200522 FEB 2005 SRVCS-ENVRNMNTL SITE ASSESSM200523 EHC CONTRACT LEAD HAZARD PUBLIC OUT1200524 LABOR TO REPAIR FIRE TRUCK 200525 CREDIT CHECKS FOR NEW PD EMPLOYEES Fi 200526 COST OF BINDING CAFR REPORTS TESTING SOFTWARE PER QUOTE DATED INSECT REPELLENT 2 WAY CHECK VALVE MOP 66155-FLOWER ARRANGEMENT STD/LTD APRIL 2005 STINGER 15' SPIKE SYSTEM, #29933900000 HEALTH ELECT INS APRIL 2005 85027A HEALTH-RET INS APRIL 2005/57135F HEALTH-RET INS APRIL 2005/85027B INTERPRETING SRVCS/MEETING 01/05/05 ICC MEMBERSHIP DUES 200527 200528 200529 200530 200531 200532 200533 200534 200535 200536 200537 200538 chk date amount 4/19/05 526.24 4/19/05 160.93 4/19/05 177.42 4/19/05 88.00 4/19/05 396.94 4/19/05 5,000.00 4/19/05 222.65 4/19/05 698.22 4/19/05 28,801.65 4/19/05 5,347.00 4/19/05 6,680.00 4/19/05 592.50 4/19/05 29,258.71 4/19/05 2,475.77 4/19/05 28.48 4/19/05 32.28 4/19/05 .153.93 4/19/05 500.80 4/19/05 81.02 4/19/05 63.57 4/19/05 7,601.94 4/19/05 1,164.80 4/19/05 2,857.11 4/19/05 2,381.63 4/19/05 979.13 4/19/05 245.00 4/19/05 180.00 5 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Lam Description IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MGMT IRON MOUNTAIN STORAGE FEES 04/30/05 JOSI PEHAU JUDD ELECTRIC TECH PERSONNEL SVCS chk no 200539 200540 EMERGENCY PUMP REPLACEMENT AT 14TH 200541 KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLA KAISER INS APRIL 2005 LASER SAVER INC LEAGUE OF CA CITIES- LEXIS-NEXIS LONG'S DRUG STORES MAAC PROJECT MAIN ST. ANIMAL HOSPITAL MAN K-9 INC. MANCILLA MAYER REPROGRAPHICS MOTOROLA MOP 45725-TONER 200542 200543 MEMBERSHIP-LATINO CAUCUS/CHRIS ZAPA1200544 ONLINE CHARGES FOR MARCH 2005 MOP 4527-POLAROID SPECTRA FILM 200545 200546 MAR 2005 MAAC CONTRACT FOR LEAD HAZP200547 VET CARE FOR POLICE K9 DOGSS POLICE K9 SERVICE DOG, P.O.S.T. RFND PARKING CITATION OVRPMNT DIGITAL BOND PREMIER MDC GOLD SUPPORT FOR PD. N & U TRUCKS & AUTO RECYCLIN MATERIAL FOR WINDOW TINT ON VEHICLE 200548 200549 200550 200551 200552 200553 NC SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAMS CATERING 04/02/05 PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITl 200554 NFPA FULFILLMENT CENTER OCE' NORTH AMERICA ORION SAFETY PRODUCTS POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC RON BAZA & ASSOCIATES, INC SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC #92104. FIRE EXPLOSION INVESTIGATION 200555 PRORATED USAGE/COPIER (cry, DESIGN ROOM 200556 FUSEES BATTERIES H31XS 200557 200558 FACILITATOR:RETREAT 200559 ADVERTISINGBIDS-MUNICIPAL POOL RENO`200560 ELECTRIC BILL/STREET#10093014384 ELECTRIC BILL/FACILITIES#29728110755 ELECTRIC BILL/STREET#98917081416 ELECTRIC BILL/FACILITIES#10091911839 200561 200562 200563 200564 ELECTRIC BILL/WASTEWATER#29491892373 200565 chk date amount 4/19/05 75.00 4/19/05 660.00 4/19/05 4,000.00 4/19/05 1,862.95 4/19/05 171.27 4/19/05 150.00 4/19/05 133.33 4/19/05 43.05 4/19/05 33,792.00 4/19/05 71.49 4/19/05 7,542.50 4/19/05 10.00 4/19/05 1,327.36 4/19/05 17,159.00 4/19/05 149.00 4/19/05 540.00 4/19/05 167.42 4/19/05 8.16 4/19/05 2,423.94 4/19/05 184.92 4/19/05 892.50 4/19/05 415.00 4/19/05 14,526.26 4/19/05 11,313.07 4/19/05 3,226.82 4/19/05 2,107.72 4/19/05 203.18 6 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Payee SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SAN DIEGO NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS SAN DIEGO TRUCK BRAKE SASI SKS INC. SNAP ON TOOLS SPARKLETTS STERLING CORPORATE SUITER SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC SUNGARD PENTAMATION INC SWEETWATER AUTHORITY SWEETWATER AUTHORITY SWEETWATER AUTHORITY SWEETWATER AUTHORITY THE CHICKEN SHACK THE STAR NEWS THE STAR NEWS THE STAR NEWS THE VILLAGE AT SQUAW VALLEY UNDERGROUND SERV ALERT UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO UNITED PARCEL SERVICE WEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTER WEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTER WURBS ELECTRIC BILL/WASTEWATER#10092646814 SDG&E/3852 BONITA MESA RD PROJ#533613 ADVERTISEMENT FOR POLICE RECRUIT CARTRIDGE OPEN ENROLMENT PARTICIPANTS VAL MAXLIFE ATF NOZZLE WATER FOR THE OFFICE 03/04/05-03/31/05 REFINISHED ALL THE FIXTURES IN THE REIMB COMMU COMPUTER PROJ (a EL TOY0200575 GUIWINDOWS MAINTENANCE - 4/1 TO 200576 RENEWAL 4JSC: 4/1/05 - 3/31/06 WATER BILLS/FACILITIES 12 ACCOUNTS WATER BILLS/STREET 11 ACCOUNTS WATER BILLS/WAS 1'hWATER#920-3000-0 WATER BILLS/PARK#920-6000-0 CATERING -DISPATCH WEEK LUNCHEON 200582 NOTICES AND ADS FOR POLICE CAMERA GR2200583 PUBLICATION OF NC14462 ORDINANCE LEGAL ADVERTISING 04/18/05- 2005 LCC CONFERENCE - EISER 100 NEW TICKETS FOR MARCH 2005, SUBSCRIPTION UNION TRIBUNE FOR 1 YR UPS SHIPMENT APRIL 2005-- ON-LINE CHARGES FOR MARCH 2005 THOMSON WEST -BOOKS 200591 REIMB FOR CONFERENCE/CCMA RETREAT 2(200592 Description chk no chk date amount 200566 4/19/05 123.91 200567 4/19/05 281.00 200568 4/19/05 124.95 200569 4/19/05 282.69 200570 4/19/05 30.00 200571 4/19/05 1,409.38 200572 4/19/05 100.42 200573 4/19/05 36.13 200574 4/19/05 960.00 4/19/05 119.40 4/19/05 8,413.62 200577 4/19/05 1,785.12 200578 4/19/05 3,604.18 200579 4/19/05 1,391.08 200580 4/19/05 79.48 200581 4/19/05 35.12 4/19/05 602.85 4/19/05 1,534.69 200584 4/19/05 307.50 200585 4/19/05 138.37 200586 4/19/05 471.66 200587 4/19/05 140:00 200588 4/19/05 180.00 200589 4/19/05 69.08 200590 4/19/05 616.15 4/19/05 299.55 4/19/05 91.56 7 Payee BAVENCOFF DELTA DENTAL DELTACARE (PMI) FORTIS BENEFITS FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO HARLAN HEALTH NET HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLA ARCO GASPRO PLUS BAYSHORE TRANSIT MGMT INC BEARCOM BOARD OF EQUALIZATION BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY COPY POST PRINTING CORPORATE EXPRESS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO DIXIELINE LUMBER CO FEDEX LIONS CLUB M&M PLASTICS NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC LIBRARY NATL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMER City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Description REIMBURSEMENT FOR MEALS DENTAL INS APRIL 2005 DENTAL INS APRIL 2005 VTL/APRIL 2005 MGMT/LTD APRIL 2005 LIFE INS APRIL 2005 ADV MEALS/MILEAGE/MICHAEL HARLAN HEALTH INS APRIL 2005/57135A ADV LODGING/MICHAEL HARLAN KAISER INS APRIL 2005 STAFF VEHICLES PAYROLL CK DTD 04/08/05 HKN6131 CABLE HANDSET CONNECTION DIESEL FUEL - JAN. - MAR. 2005 TIRES - JANUARY '05 AUTO PARTS SPANISH AND TAGALOG SET-UPS OFFICE SUPPLIES PAYROLL PPE 04/02/05 - JOSE VAZQEZ PAYROLL PPE 04/02/05 - SHERRY LOGEL PAINT & RUST/VARNISH SHIPPING CHARGES chk no 200593 200594 200595 200596 200597 200598 200599 200600 200601 200602 200603 200604 200605 200606 200607 200608 200609 200610 200611 200612 200613 200614 BACK COVER & BOOTH FOR INTERNTL PARA200615 MISCELLANEOUS BUS SUPPLIES AS NEEDED200616 AUTO PARTS 200617 LIBRARY DONATION ST. FLORIAN'S FIRE SERVICE BREAKFAST 200618 200619 chk date 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 4/19/05 amoun 55.00 15,448.19 3,560.81 2,203.68 3,152.39 1,687.08 142.62 63,302.14 278.46 99,126.38 415.04 45,191.97 167.03 374.69 3,310.52 38.56 993.51 20.36 50.00 23.04 82.15 95.58 575.00 93.78 141.35 29.85 300.00 8 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Payee Description chk no chk date mount NEW FLYER PARTS LIGHT INDICATOR 200620 4/19/05 93.80 NORTHWEST PUMP & EQUIPT CO ROLL A ROUND BASE 200621 4/19/05 158.13 SAN DIEGO BUS DRIVERS UNION UNION DUES - MAR. '05 200622 4/19/05 1,142.20 SAN DIEGO TRUCK BRAKE INV#2250880003 - MI-MA15777X MAXI BRAKE 200623 4/19/05 307.01 SHERMAN SUPERSONIC INDUSTRI SSI PARTS FOR PRESSURE WASHER, AS 200624 4/19/05 1,792.22 SPARKLETTS WATER 03/04/05 - 03/31/05 200625 4/19/05 85.54 TORRES TOOL ALLOWANCE 200626 4/19/05 250.00 W.W. GRAINGER, INC. FILTER 200627 4/19/05 182.83 WAYNE ELECTRIC CO 713RU ALT 50DN 24V BELT DRIVE 200628 4/19/05 673.44 Total $ 592,721.54 Workers compensation checks 4/13/05 9772 4/13/05 9773 4/13/05 9774 4/13/05 9775 4/13/05 9776 4/13/05 9777 4/13/05 9778 4/13/05 9779 4/13/05 9780 4/13/05 9781 4/13/05 9782 4/13/05. 9783 4/13/05 9784 4/13/05 9785 4/13/05 9786 4/13/05 9771 252.33 168.84 45.61 157.90 92.91 83.94 133.60 568.13 798.19 815.50 83.94 99.40 99.28 95.91 80.68 160.67 9 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Payee Description chk no chk date amount 9787 4/13/05 35.70 9788 4/13/05 47.39 9789 4/13/05 47.60 9790 4/13/05 208.56 9791 4/13/05 687.63 9792 4/13/05 83.94 9793 4/13/05 76.44 9794 4/13/05 141.13 9795 4/13/05 47.60 9796 4/13/05 90.95 9797 4/13/05 145.77 9799 4/13/05 1,701.66 9800 4/13/05 66,00 9801 4/13/05 649.35 9802 4/13/05 87.21 9803 4/13/05 130.01 9804 4/13/05 167.41 9805 4/13/05 76.19 9806 4/13/05 152.38 9807 4/13/05 324.34 9808 4/13/05 76.19 9809 4/13/05 144.84 9810 4/13/05 110.50 9811 4/13/05 76.19 9812 4/13/05 500.63 9813 4/13/05 76.19 9814 4/13/05 76.19 10 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 41 4/19/05 Payee Description chk no chk date amount 9815 4/13/05 76.19 9816 4/13/05 110.50 9817 4/13/05 471.25 9818 4/13/05 154.29 9819 4/13/05 400.00 9820 4/13/05 370.00 9821 4/13/05 32.30 9822 4/13/05 637.50 9823 4/13/05 97.26 9824 4/13/05 779.94 9825 4/13/05 33.24 9826 4/13/05 261.51 9827 4/13/05 151.00 9828 4/13/05 755.13 Total $ 14,094.93 Grand Total 606,816.47 LIBRARY WARRANTS CK#200411-200503 93 CHECKS $ 79,070.03 TRANSIT WARRANTS CK#200603-200628 26 CHECKS $ 56,587.60 PAID OUT OF HUD GUARANTEED LOAN FUND ACCT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FIRE STATION. CK#200104-200107 4 CHECKS $ 3,909.48 11 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER #41 4/19/05 001 GENERAL FUND 228,498.99 104 LIBRARY FUND 6,048.64 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 2,044.17 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 26,148.62 109 GAS TAXES FUND 20,373.04 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 476.08 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 19,691.35 131 ASSET FORFEITURE FUND 926.54 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 592.50 222 WOW MOBILE GRANT FY.2000-2001 524.75 225 ENGLISH LANGUAGE LITERACY IN 22,170.63 250 NEW FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 3,909.48 254 LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUC 63,050.71 271 JOBS HOUSING BALANCE GRANT 960.00 274 LITERACY INITIATIVE XIII 5,804.63 275 EASY VOTER GUIDE GRANT 730.14 276 LITERACY SERVICES YEAR 2 2,419.66 277 NC PUBLIC LIBRARY DONATIONS F 14.55 278 AMERICORPS LSTA GRANT II 3,174.58 279 PRIME TIME FAMILY READING TIME 4,328.60 280 AMERICORPS/CNCS YEAR 2 GRANT 7,705.11 301 GRANT-C.D.B.G. 7,691.27 302 CDC PAYMENTS 18,608.27 303 CAPITAL FACILITIES FUND 1,327.36 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 8,301.87 312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY 20,499.78 552 TDA 56,575.57 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 17,024.97 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 14,094.93 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 3,013.89 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENA 28,406.68 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVI 864.59 632 GENERAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 157.28 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 4,683.20 724 COBRA/RETIREE INSURANCE 5,974.04 TOTAL 606,816.47 12 Certification IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 37202, 37208, 372059 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE DEMANDS LISTED ABOVE AND TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF AND FURTHER THAT THE ABOVE CLAIMS AND DEMANDS HAVE BEEN AUDITED AS REQUIRED BY LAW. A CE DIRECTOR. CITY MANAGER FINANCE COMMITTEE NICK INZUNZA, MAYOR -CHAIRMAN RONALD J. MORRISON, MEMBER FRANK PARRA, MEMBER LUIS NATIVIDAD, MEMBER ROSALIE ZARATE, MEMBER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS WERE APPROVED AND THE CITY TREASURER IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE SAID WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREOF BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE 17TH DAY OF MAY 2005. AYES NAYS ABSENT City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 17, 2005 MEETING DATE 15 AGENDA ITEM NO. (-ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER #42 PREPARED BY Finance EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Finance Alison Hunter 619-336-4330 Ratification of Warrant Register #42 per Government Section Code 37208. EXT. ( Environmental Review Financial Statement Not applicable. N/A MIS Approval Approved iqedtAdjej_ B Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $ 2,693,735.63. ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) ' Resolution No. 1. Warrant Register #42 2. Workers Comp Wan -ant Register dated 04/20/05 3. Payroll Warrant Register dated 04/20/05 A•200 (Rev. 7/03) a ee MARCO 1 1 F. & HEARNE BUILDERS RUDOLPH AND SLETTEN, INC SAN DIEGO DAILY TRANSCRIPT SANDPIPA LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES ACEDO AIRGAS-WEST AMARR ENTERPRISES MERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO., INC BOARD OF EQUALIZATION BONITA PET HOSPITAL BOOT WORLD BUSH POWER BRAKE SERVICE BUTLER'S MILL, INC. CARQUEST AUTO PARTS CARRIER JOHNSON CARRIER JOHNSON, INC. CHICK'S ELECTRIC MOTOR, INC. CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL CHOICEPOINT CLEAN HARBORS COPY WORLD ORPORATE EXPRESS City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 42 4/26/05 Description e no chk date amount MAR 2005 SRVCS-NC FIRE STATION #34 200108 4/26/05 327,548.35 MAR 2005 SRVCS-NC FIRE STATION #34 200109 4/26/05 9,972.00 ARTIST/FIRE STATION ART PROJECT 200110 4/26/05 83.70 PARMA MEETING 04/27/05-KASSIA KOSSYTA 200629 4/21/05 20.00 LEAGUE DINNER 200630 4/21/05 100.00 REIMB/TEEN EXTREME PROGRAM/ACEDO IRIv 200631 4/26/05 249.40 MOP 45714 SAFETY GLASSES 200632 4/26/05 . 63.73 3 XXXL PORT PIMA WHITE POLO SHIRTS, EMB 200633 4/26/05 349.11 MOP 62683 SWEEPER REPAIR 200634 4/26/05 535.52 SALES & USE TAX 1ST QRTR 2005 200636 4/26/05 1,947.00 EMERGENCY ANIMAL CARE FOR STRAY ANIIv 200637 4/26/05 564.00 MOP 64096 SAFETY BOOTS - ACOSTA 200638 4/26/05 310.25 MOP 45694-REAR ROTORS -VEHICLE #413 200639 4/26/05 50.00 MOP 45695 CHALK FOR BALLFIELDS 200640 4/26/05 268.35 MOP 47557-DISC PAD VEHICLE #413 200641 4/26/05 64.29 MAR 2005 SRVCS MC MISC FF&E DESIGN SRVC 200642 4/26/05 8,612.60 FEB 28-MAR 27 2005 NC LIBRARY BASIC SRVC 200643 4/26/05 18,662.63 MOP 45700-POOL FANS 200644 4/26/O5 343.56 CHILD SEXUAL ASSAULT EXAMS AS NEEDED 200645 4/26/05 720.40 AUTO TRACK DATABASE - UNLIMITED ACCES 200646 4/26/05 200.00 HAZARDOUS HOUSEHOLD WASTE PICK UP, A 200647 4/26/05 325.00 COPY AGENDA OF REG MEETING 4/19/05 200648 4/26/05 196.73 MOP 45704-TAXICAB ADMIN OFFICE SUPPLIES 200649 4/26/05 502.79 1 D-MAX ENGINEERING INC DIXIELINE LUMBER CO. DOCUMENT SERVICES, ISF DOKKEN ENGINEERING DOUGLAS E. BARNHART, INC ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS SERVICES ESGIL CORPORATION FEDEX FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC GRAINGER HANSON AGGREGATES PACIFIC HART'S AUTO SUPPLY HARWARD JAYNES CORPORATION JAYNES CORPORATION OF AMERICA KILLACKY, KEVIN KLEINFELDER, INC. KLEINFELDER, INC. LAW OFFICE OF NANCY J SPIECZNY LEXIS-NEXIS LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE LONG'S DRUG STORES LOPEZ MAINTEX, INC. MARCOTTE & HEARNE BUILDERS MCDOUGAL LOVE ECKIS SMITH & NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL CITY DETAIL SHOP NC SENIOR NUTRITION PROGRAMS NORTH PARK TROPHY & AWARD CO. MAR 2005 STORM WATER SRVCS MOP 45707 TACKER/STAPLES MARCH 2005 MAIL SERVICES SRVCS MAR 1-31, 2005 PLAZA BLVD WIDENING MAR 2005 SRVCS-CONSTRCTN MGMT LIBRAR' LEAD WIPE SAMPLES PROJECT#04-05-0187 PLANS SENT TO ESGIL MARCH 2005 FEDEX PRIORITY OVERNIGHT SHIPMENT MOP 45723 PLUMBING STOCK MOP 65179-METAL HOSE SHEET MIX ASPHALT @ $31.25/TON. BRAKE PARTS EDUC REIMBURSEMENT/D HARWARD ESCROW RETENTION ACCT#2010160619 MAR 2005 SRVCS-CONSTRCTN NC LIBRARY EDUC REIMBURSEMENT/K KILLACKY MAR 2005 SRVCS-NC PUB LIBRARY SPL SRVC MATERIAL TESTING/CITY HALL REMODEL LIABILITY CLAIM COSTS CA DEER ADVANCE LEGISLATIVE SERVICES RETAINER AGREEMENT - MARCH 2005 MOP 45727-FIRST AID SUPPLIES REIMB FOR A MEETING ON 3/16/05 INV#791624 - SPRAY SOLV CASE 4/1 MAR 2005 SRVCS-NC FIRE STATION #34 FEB 2005 ATTY SRVCS RE: EDWORDS V. CNC MOP 45735 BRAKE PADS MOP 45767 AUTO DETAIL CATERING AT MEETING 02/09/05- 1/4"X4" WHITE HELVETICA LETTERS FOR 200650 200651 200652 200653 200654 200655 200656 200657 200658 200659 200660 200661 200662 200663 200664 200665 200666 200667 200668 200669 200670 200671 200672 200673 200674 200675 200676 200677 200678 200679 4/26/05 38,685.5' 4/26/05 705.. 4/26/05 3,413.81 4/26/05 5,541.26 4/26/05 18,262.00 4/26/05 18.00 4/26/05 13,071.54 4/26/05 18.99 4/26/05 121.03 4/26/05 37.09 4/26/05 201.09 4/26/05 415.00 4/26/05 600.00 4/26/05 48,082.00 4/26/05 913,5535 4/26/05 275.00 4/26/05 928.50 4/26/05 747.25 4/26/05 400.00 4/26/05 108.86 4/26/05 1,300.00 4/26/05 38.68 4/26/05 21.24 4/26/05 500.87 4/26/05 146,402.45 4/26/05 499.75 4/26/05 327.11 4/26/05 130.00 4/26/05 55. 4/26/05 484.11 2 `)FFICE OF CONTROLLER ONE SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS ONE SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS' PARADISE VALLEY CHURCH PARTS PLUS AUTOSTORE #713 PAULSON REPORTING SERVICES,INC PENNYSAVER PERRY FORD POOL SUPPLY OF ORANGE COUNTY POST POWELL POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM ANDALL CONSTRUCTION ROJAS SAN DIEGO FITNESS EQUIPMENT SAN DIEGO NEIGHBORHOOD NEWS SAN DIEGO PET & LAB SUPPLY SAN DIEGO POLICE EQUIPMENT SD COUNTY DEPT OF AGRICULTURE SD LEGAL SECRETARIES ASSO SHOCKWEAR SMART & FINAL SOUTHERN CALIF TRUCK STOP STATE COMPENSATION INS FUND TAB PRODUCTS CO TARULLI TIRE SAN DIEGO INC JE LIGHTHOUSE, INC. REFUND UNUSED GRANT MONEY MOP 67256 LIGHTS FOR PLANNING DEPT. MOP 67256-FOLD HEX SET SEMINAR REGISTRATION/JUNIEL AND AMEDE MOP 64946-ARM PART LIABILITY CLAIM COSTS DISPLAYS ADS PRINTED ON 3/09/05 MOP 45703-ALIGNMENT VEHICLE #386 LIQUID CHLORINE, $.81/GALLON. TO BE REIMB TRAVEL EXPS-LEAGUE OF CA CI11.ES EDUC REIMBURSEMENT/L POWELL D750U YELLOW MOP 45742 UNIFORM CLEANING - STREET SERVICE PERIOD 04-05-3 FEB 2005 SRVCS-REMODEL 2ND FLR LOBBY/H TRAVEL EXP RE1MB/DISPATCHING TESTING LABOR ON 03/30/05 FOR PREVENTIVE ADVERTISING/SPEC 04-13 MOP 45753-K9 SUPPLIES PACA VEST, PA-ZPG1 11A, SDSO MODEL, LABORATORY SRVCS JAN-MAR 2005 SDLSA 2005/2006 MEMBERSHIP - BURGUNDY LONG SLEEVE T-SHIRTS MOP 45756 BOTTLED WATER MOP 45758-PROPANE EXPERT & CONSULTANT SERVICES TAB PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES MOP 47940-TIRE REPAIR MOP 45726-LIGHTS 200680 200681 200682 200683 200684 200685 200686 200687 200688 200689 200690 200691 200692 200693 200694 200695 200696 200697 200698 200699 200700 200701 200702 200703 200704 200705 200706 200707 200708 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 3,006.04 408.29 57.32 140.00 14.82 1,145.50 436.62 233.50 872.78 261.44 600.00 85.73 505.49 61,851.34 33,368.67 12.96 385.00 285.77 586.37 505.35 75.00 50.00 815.13 36.95 47.63 6,861.40 175.17 170.00 58.08 3 THE STAR NEWS TOPECO PRODUCTS TURF STAR U.S. HEALTHWORKS UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SPECIALTIES VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT WEST GROUP PAYMENT CENTER WESTERN GRAPHICS WESTFLEX INDUSTRIAL WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY YOUNG CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COPY POST PRINTING DURRA INK RANDALL CONSTRUCTION SAN DIEGO BUSINESS JOURNAL SHRED -IT STRATACOM BAYSHORE TRANSIT MGMT INC CINTAS CORPORATION #694 CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMMINS CAL PACIFIC, LLC DIRECT TV DIXIELINE LUMBER CO FIRST ADVANTAGE CORPORATION GIBBS JANKOVICH COMPANY LLOYD PEST CONTROL PROOF OF. PUBLICATION OF NC14461 MOP 63849 TIRES TIRE MEDICAL SERVICES 03/24/05 ADVERTISEMENT FOR POLICE RECRUIT MOP 46453-JAIL CELL RESTROOMS REPAIRS GRAFFITI PAINT BLINDS FOR EL TOYON NALS BASIC MANUAL OF THE LAWYERS ASSI NEWSLEI 1ER MAILINGS 3/31/05 FT 8' UREFLEX 1 CORRUGATED POLYURETHA MOP 45763 WATT INVERTER REIMB/TEEN PROGRAM EASTER CAMP PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT ANIMAL CONTROL BOOKS VARIOUS PRINTING JOBS MAR 2005 SRVCS-REMODEL 2ND FLR/HR HERITAGE AWARDS DINNER INV#00910113882 -SHREDDING OF DOCUMENT NOTICE TO APPEAR FORMS PAYROLL CK DTD 04/22/05 MAINT LAUNDRY SERVICE RACK BUS PARTS AS NEEDED FOR FY05 DIRECT TV 04/13/05 - 05/12/05 MATERIALS FOR TRATLES RANDOM DRUG TESTING SMART CARD FOR DIGITAL CAMERA DIESEL FUEL TERMITE TREATMENT 200709 200710 200711 200712 200713 200714 200715 200716 200717 200718 200719 200720 200721 200722 200723 200724 200725 200726 200727 200728 200729 200730 200731 200732 200733 200734 200735 200736 200737 200738 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 128.1? 77.51 40.00 283.73 805.10 1,090.20 328.94 45.26 2,886.89 325.35 371.83 185.10 1,251.58 226.7" 704.02 74,241.23 450.00 1,032.00 758.56 43,572.31 196.21 505.69 38.07 74.98 208.88 575.00 64.64 14,708.! 325.00 4 M&M PLASTICS MC DONALD TRANSIT ASSOC. INC. NEW FLYER PARTS NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP SBC SHERMAN SUPERSONIC INDUSTRIES SOUTH COAST MEDICAL CLINIC THE LIGHTHOUSE W.W. GRAINGER, INC. ARCO GASPRO PLUS LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES Workers compensation checks MISCELLANEOUS BUS SUPPLIES AS NEEDED MANAGEMENT FEE - APRIL '05 MICROPHONE BLK PHONE & RADIO CHARGES 401K PPE 04/16/05 PHONE CHARGES SSI PARTS FOR PRESSURE WASHER, AS PHYSICAL EXAM - JAMIE ROSE HEADLAMP SHOP SUPPLIES FUEL FOR CITY FLEET 04/03/05 LEAGUE OF CA DINNER-R ZARATE LEAGUE OF CA DINNER-F PARRA LEAGUE OF CA DINNER-R MORRISON Total 9832 9833 9834 9835 9836 9837 9838 9839 9840 9841 200739 200740 200741 200742 200743 200744 200745 200746 200747 200748 200749 200750 200751 200752 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 4/26/05 9829 4/20/05 9830 4/20/05 9831 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 4/20/05 373.15 12,285.00 582.08 693.07 2,433.78 269.16 110.97 72.00 8.08 323.85 21,467.87 50.00 50.00 50.00 1,864,166.96 5.44 514.29 1,192.46 320.00 5.44 552.50 9.25 45.13 94.32 996.74 15.24 2,802.14 76.00 5 PAYROLL Pay period Start Date End Date Check Date 251 3/29/05 4/11/05 4/20/05 GRAND TOTAL Total Total 9842 4/20/05 27.x 9843 4/20/05 11.47 9844 4/20/05 41.44 9845 4/20/05 170.08 9846 4/20/05 262.88 9847 4/20/05 134.80 9848 4/20/05 60.98 9849 4/20/05 213.72 9850 4/20/05 216.58 9851 4/20/05 137.38 9852 4/20/05 135.00 9853 4/20/05 181.75 9854 4/20/05 176.14 9855 4/20/05 244.48 9856 4/20/05 389.. 9857 4/20/05 441.87 9858 4/20/05 57.50 9859 4/20/05 123.31 9860 4/20/05 76.19 9861 4/20/05 122.19 VOID WARRANT CK#200635 TRANSIT WARRANTS CK#200729-200748 20 CHECKS $ 77,420.08 PAID OUT OF HUD GUARANTEED LOAN FUND ACCT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW FIRE STATION CK#200108-200110 3 CHECKS $337,604.05 9,854.09 819,714.58 2,693,735.63 6 City of National City Warrant Register #42 04/26/05 001 GENERAL FUND 104 LIBRARY FUND 776,376.87 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 32,340.18 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 17,257.03 120 PLAN CHECKING REVOLVING FUND 101.84 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 13,071.54 135 SD COUNTY REG AUTO THEFT TASK 49,604.77 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 3,699.68 147 GRANT -JUDGE PROGRAM 180.21 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 1,4827 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 969.00 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 99.00 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT 2,010.06 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 2,256.35 188 GRANT -HIDTA 5,554.56 191 STOP PROJECT 3,714.08 196 CAPITAL PROJECT RESERVE 3,062.26 211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND 283. 212 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND 1,263.33 3 222 WOW MOBILE GRANT FY 2000-2001 11,566.03 230 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT GRANT ,853.68 239 LOCAL LAW ENF BLOCK GRANT FY2002-2003 3,433.90 241 NATIONAL CITY LIBRARY STATE GRANT 5,265.50 655,265.50 242 N. CITY LIBRARY MATCHING FUND 246 WINGS GRANT 352,835.23 250 NEW FIRE STATION CONSTRUCTION 18,680.50 253 RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES FUND 337,604.05 254 LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION GRANT 096.23 6,096.23 273 CBAG-MAJOR MEXICAN TRAFFICKERS 274 LITERACY INITIATIVE XIII 3,174.47 275 EASY VOTER GUIDE GRANT 1,029.20 276 LITERACY SERVICES YEAR 2 181.51 280 AMERICORPS/CNCS YEAR 2 GRANT 841.61 301 GRANT-C.D.B.G. 1,145.89 302 CDC PAYMENTS 10,311.63 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 160,694.01 312 STP LOCAL/TRANSNET HIGHWAY 5,559.18 552 TDA 3,944.03 77, 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 20013.86 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND ,013.86 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 22,483.13 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 6,198.51 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 4,092.82 632 GENERAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 4092.85 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 23,962.62 Total 36,218.80 2,693,735.63 7 Certification IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 37202, 37208, 372059 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE, WE HEREBY CERTIFY TO THE ACCURACY OF THE DEMANDS LISTED ABOVE AND TO THE AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS FOR THE PAYMENT THEREOF AND FURTHER THAT THE ABOVE CLAIMS AND DEMANDS HAVE BEEN AUDITED AS REQUIRED BY LAW. CITY MANAGER FINANCE COMMITTEE NICK INTZUNZA, MAYOR -CHAIRMAN RONALD J. MORRISON, MEMBER FRANK. PARRA, MEMBER .LUIS NATIVIDAD, MEMBER ROSALIE ZARATE, MEMBER I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING CLAIMS AND DEMANDS WERE APPROVED AND THE CITY TREASURER IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE SAID WARRANTS IN PAYMENT THEREOF BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE I7TH DAY OF MAY 2005. AYES NAYS ABSENT .EETING DATE May 17, 2005 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 16 ITEM TITLE CLAIM FOR DAMAGES: Salvador Pulido III PREPARED BY Michael R. Della, CMOOEPARTMENT City Clerk EXPLANATION The claim of Salvador Pulido III arises from an occurrence on February 5, 2005 and was filed with the City Clerk's Office on March 10, 2005 ( Environmental Review ,_ WA Financial Statement N/A >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approved By: Finance Director Account No. Deny the claim, and refer to the City Attorney. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A A-200 (9/99) Resolution No. City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE - May 17 , 2 17 AGENDA ITEM NO. / ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — LIONS CLUB — 4111 OF JULY CELEBRATION from June 27-July 5, 2005 at Kimball Park L PREPARED BY Ros EXPLANATION ez 336-4210 DEPARTMENT Building and Safety EXT. This is a request from the National City Lions Club to conduct the Annual Fourth of July Independence Day Celebration in Kimball Park. The dates and times of the event are as follows: 8:00 a.m. 5 p.m.-11 p.m. 5 p.m.-11 p.m. 1 p.m. —11 p.m. 1 p.m. —11 p.m. 12 p.m.- 12 a.m. complete by 8 a.m. Setup Monday, June 27 Actual Event Thursday, June 30 Friday, July 1 Saturday, July 2 Sunday, July 3 Monday, July 4 Tuesday, July 5 Tear Down This year's event includes musical entertainment, fireworks on July 4th at 9 p.m., a carnival, talent shows, food booths and community sponsored displays. The Police Department requests full cost recovery for police personnel overtime. The application and the event qualify for a waiver of fees pursuant to City Council Policy No. 704. 2 ( Environmental Review X_ N/A /Financial Statement Costs for Police ($9,002.58), Public Works ($4,984.35), Fire ($1,050), Parks ($6,600.00), Finance ($50.00), and the TUP processing costs total $21,687.07. Account No. N/A >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Attflage4A4 Approve the Application for a Te porary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval and grant the request or a waiver of all fees. MIS Approval BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A Approved By: Finance Director L.ATTACHMENTS Listed Below) Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and conditions of approval. A-200 (Rev. 7103) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: National City Host Lions Club EVENT: Annual Fourth of July Independence Day Celebration DATE OF EVENT: June 30 through July 4, 2005 AZEROVALS: PLANNING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS FINANCE COMMUNITY SERVICE POLICE PARKS & REC. ENGINEERING CITY ATTORNEY RISK MANAGER YES [x] NO [ ] YES [. x ] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES[x] NO[ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [ x ] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: GENERAL CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED IN PRIOR YEARS 1. No alcohol shall be sold or served. 2. The Lions Club shall give National City service organizations priority over outside organizations participating in the event. 3. The Lions Club is to provide a thorough and complete fmancial report within 120 days of conclusion of the event detailing all revenue sources and the amount of revenue received from each source, the amount of each expenditure and total expenditures, the amount of revenue in excess of expenditures retained by the Loins Club, and proposed budget for the use of revenues generated from the event. 4. The use of amplifiers to be limited to the hours of the stage events. 5. Written notification must be given to the occupants of the property adjacent to the park. The notification must be mailed no less than 72 hours prior to the event. FIRE 336-4550 1. A fireworks permit will be required. The fee is $349.00 to be paid by the fireworks company. 2. All cooking booths shall have one 2A:10BC or 40:BC fire extinguisher with a current California State Fire Marshal tag attached. 3. Metal cans with lids, labeled "HOT COALS ONLY", shall be provided for charcoal disposal. 4. A fire safety inspection shall be conducted by the fire department prior to the operation of the carnival, of all rides, cooking area, etc. 5. Fire safety inspection of the fireworks shooting and fallout areas shall be conducted prior to any fireworks display. 6. Emergency access shall not be blocked at any time. 7. Access to Morgan and Kimball Towers shall be maintained at all times. 8. Fire Department connections shall not be obstructed at any time. 9. Cost recovery for overtime is $352.14 plus a carnival permit of $349.00 total $701.14 10. Fire Department access into the booth areas to be maintained at all times FINANCE 336-4330 1. A Business License is required if monies are solicited, admission fee is charged, or if food, beverages and merchandise are sold. The organization holding this event and each vendor present at this event must have a separate business license. Vendors currently licensed by the City may operate under their existing license. 2. A $2,500 bond and a $50 inspection fee are required for the carnival or circus, which has to be paid at least two weeks prior to the start date of the event. 3. A list of all participating vendors (with their address, phone number, and current National City business license number) is to be provided to the Revenue & Recovery Division of the Finance Department two weeks prior to the event for verification of business licenses. 4. If any of the vendors or organizations is registered not for profit, there will be no charge for the Business License. However, a business license certificate must be obtained from the City Revenue and Recovery Division, business license section. (Note: a clearance fee does apply to Non-profit organizations located in National City that submit an initial business license application.) PARKS & REC. 336-4290 1. Overtime to be paid in the amount of $6,600.00. 2. Provide security for event at day and evening. CITY ATTORNEY 1. Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement, and a policy of general liability insurance, with the City and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with amounts of coverage to be determined by the Risk Manager. RISK MANAGER 336-4240 Lions' club, fire works contractor and carnival ride provider each: 1. Provide minimum limits of one million dollars per occurrence of general liability insurance. 2. Name the City of National City, its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds on the above policy. 3. National City Lions' Club execute standard hold harmless with the City of National City. (Done) PUBLIC WORKS 336-4580 1. Street division will post "No Parking" signs and close (barricade) "D" Ave during the event, cost $134.35. 2. Facilities to provide utilities service for booths (electricity, gas, water & sewer). Cost is estimated to be $1,550. Booth rental will be $3,300. POLICE Police Department cost analysis is estimated to be $9,002.58. (THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. AND NATIONAL CITY TRANSIT AND SAN DIEGO TRANSIT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED) Type of Event _Public Concert Parade Fair Demonstration Motion Picture _ Grand Opening Festival Community Event Circus X OtherC,42n/ 1 ✓4 L.r Block Party Event Title: WA -A nAl L C.-Iy al: ill 6,) s e L aj a $14 ✓ L V l o C Auk y Gg,ei✓, der L. Event Location: ,%n' BA-LL 7'4 21‹ Event Date(s): From 6 3o- b ‹to 7- y-OS-Total Anticipated Attendance: / 5 nOr) '1��-,.1 f- 1-}ertc2,S ManthlDayKeat Ly 7-- 11111 tv' { Participants) iu-avG 7 o — 6 to 11 PM 34-LV 3 - 1 Z. t! Pail Spectators) L/ ! s te1/ Pi" L y y - t' Ii1,r7n►rc-d/'r Setup/assembly/construction Date: i -17 Start time: "Sr ; O D /4-""- Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details): S64- a ,JAL- R,T5,1L' aoo-nJs -k-I a00t Dismantle Date: 7-5- o5 Completion Time: S7 Z' amhatt List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event. Include street name(s), day and time o closi g andday and time of reopening. Sponsoring Organization: LC, Chief Officer of Organization (Name) Applicant (Name): •JT01 �,� K R J / Address: 31 / JJ a �l � L � ..,fy ed9 9 Oct) Daytime Phone: (IW) h177 SS 32..-Evening Phone: (/j5i 1//74/- %/y$SFax: (L./7 3? C..- z 7 16? Contact Person "on site' day of the event: ID /IA I< c R Not -for -Profit J-RKiRkUS e_.ox,,�1Ct Pager/Cellular:419) "?nZp NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST BE IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO CITY OFFICIALS 1 Is your organization a "Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization?(ES — NO Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? *YES ® NO If YES. please explain the purpose and provide amount(s): VA/J t>.G2Z 'R,e n1' - 14 HE 4- DE L1 F3QOTds !2rr� t r10 ('REC to lac) s3 DOD °�O Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this event. Slot e c o i Estimated Expenses for this event. $ I . o'o i What is the projected amount of revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive as a result of this event? Please provide a DETAILED DESCRIPTION of your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides or any other pertinent information about the event.. / owl la- Cr/-y ih, + Lt DVS CL„w8 t1J• SPon.SoR E fFalr/ttA L q' f/d L 4- C. tz. two R Ks /nJ nM BALL FARK cPoM 11444 ASD4y I �u.Ly 1006 - -0/czocc.(,,/I .511-1,Lygoo 114,c g✓e=#-f t?RDF&ss 'Dal AL LA-2AIIVAL_RInec5, coed f�no'f'}i<5, e tzN,I/4L Gfm4Alb A G RC waf4-e3 SPLA y dA) 5y yr Q c7 00 T YtJ /,J AID D,+ nw, LL r3G- -1T LS&t sWoo., 'LooD y►,oc3,t�, I7,4-8E -< SG/ZrFn),A,6/ 41411 o1) E R e. D M M LG, , t+/ ► c ?LA. Y 5 L2. iti ,� YES v NO If the event involves the sale of cars, will the cars come exclusively from National City car dealers? If NO, list any additional dealers involved in the sale: 2 _ YES *NO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? YES _ NO Will items or services be sold at the event? If yes, please describe: 00412d1VA-L IZtb6s+441,465 fri%JD 2ah -Re a` %S S ylf-NO Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. YES _ NO Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach a detailed site map showing all streets impacted by the event. 4. YES _ NO Does the event involve the use of tents or canopies? If YES: Number of tent/canopies 10 Sizes gi() O e^ / X 1 SJ NOTE: A separate Fire Department permit is required for tents or canopies. YES — NO Will the event involve the use of the City stage or PA system? In addition to the route map required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and set-up locations for the following items: D Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession and/or Beer Garden areas. D Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas Please describe how food will be served at the event:5 o D 3n 6--%G L.J i `L E "R A/ By JDN-PRoPc1- ota.c. vr.4j-Ie/41r.c1 rL�ccfLL�rS you--0-I AiJD C,.Vr c. PRvA-.vt s Iffintend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: GAS ELECTRIC CHARCOAL OTHER (Specify): D Portable and/or Permanent Toilet Facilities Number of portable toilets: / to, (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that tp�tere are facilities in the immediate area availab a to the publi9 during the event) /5 KG-E, L, Lrg-R "* / Y»AI7, G.vf- P W/ A 14 A 5 r1 s'74tr 0 DJ Tables and Chairs ➢, Fencing, barriers and/or barricades D` Generator locations and/or source of electricity D' Canopies or tent locations (include tent/canopy dimensions) D Booths, exhibits, displays or endosures D Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages, grandstands or related structures D Vehides and/or trailers D Other related event components not covered above D Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be returned to a clean condition.) Number of trash cans: A o Trash containers with lids: t7 Describeyour plan for clean-up and removal of waste and garbage during and after the event: Dr,cu�1t f4E,a RG.•v-feD 8yN ►aN/+C.. e./t` tiflS�-LiDAis dot- WI LA- 8 114 -TM-E ul's4 PA-PK i A LaL.% P44 KS 'f' Rd:G, JjG-P7 w ! LL aonJ-f'/,./ 14.osI- y P / TR if5 f tJ S Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Security: s6�4-4—(2..I+1 Ft -AN Fay nnlA-L Cry ?D. it -YES _ NO Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangementsfor this event? If YES, please list: Security Organization: -/"n J E �� 2 rye ►1 i - Security Organization Address: Security Director (Name): Phone: *YES _ NO Is this a night event? If YES, please state how the event and surrounding area will be iltuminated to ensure safety of the participants and spectators: 1?A& L Ic,,4t*5 4- L, U 7'.S Rap tvt r.14-(2•nJ , ,/A- L (Z ► S -- To Please indicate what arrangement you have made for providing First Aid Staffing and Equipment. Please describe your Accessibility Plan for access at your event by individuals with disabilities: P,4-2K (,ae_D Th5 4- Si- C—,,)A-LKs - e,nJE a�fo2 Al -korLds ►s 10—Atc-I:554164 Please provide a detailed description of your PARKING plan: W i LL &v► Li- , J SC- EX► 5 -11I S�a2t i + AnT /�JC—H2k3 Pwr3� G ► PA- ►e K, ,JA L 0 f Pie se describe your plan for DISABLED PARKING: r1/c s 1 k tE s( fh o at- A-/ J `f±,,cJ c—/L 5 A-N b /A) tP AK, J 6, Lol-s 4 • r , Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event LC— t—? ir2 5 p n -�1 C e ,9- �, n.J ui , L t- "5c= N ' f -fp i.LI- k s,D6"-Ic S I,JttNL�—A NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. - NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: ON C Number of Bands: Type of Music: K-S / . YES — NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Start time: t%AC,o.r t� am/pm Finish Time D 0 wpm *YES _ NO Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? If YES, please indicate: Start time: Il f}-2i n c & SamPpm Finish Time 9 DO a//pm Please describe the sound equipment that will be used for your event: / nu/Al6 S-%tC-�C- G, / cfrai ✓,4�'� sa,,,v) Sis7 S 4.YES _ NO Fireworks, rockets, or other pyrotechnics? If YES, please describe: FR o FG-s5, o../ A-L RB t un QKS DI STAR y o "' Ly y t 9: Do n1 Syy,VG2c7N1 SF•D w,ThL K x/ R MrD t o :s t -ft on1 ® TifE s 4-nn T a rK 6- *S o7 /� /2 s -rfitz®-0- / n u 7-' 11C C.-&ty FES — NO Any signs, banners, decorations, special fighting? If YES, please describe: -321213/ uj c LC-- 17� c. a n,J Revised 10/3/01 5 City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use.of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which indudes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached__to this_ /permit. Organization L-i0N5 2 ��.c.'?S /4.144/2 /it %t OJ J4 — Person In Charge of Activity /4i. �G2f / L if-/,4 17 (7 Address 3q ,23 014". 5.Z ,e icl vitititt e>t�%G/t/ ct Telephoma ic0 767 - ✓� 2 y Date(s) of Use ,'t c_.1_ v 6, , o o S HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT As a condition of the issuance of a temporary use permit to conduct its activities on public or private property, the undersigned hereby agree(s) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City and the Parking Authority and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims/ demands, costs, losses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage, or both, or any litigation and other liability, including attomeys fees and the costs of litigation, arising out of or related to the use of public property or the activity taken under the permit by the permittee or its agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Ap C-- ij/4-1 Official Title For Off a Use Only J.ate ^,o-QS Certificate of Insurance Approved Date 7 Non-profit organizations, which meet the criteria on page v of the instructions, will be considered for a waiver. If you would like to request a waiver of the processing fees, please complete the questionnaire below. 1 Is the event for which the TUP is sought sponsored by a non-profit organization? Yes (proceed to Question 2) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 2. Please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the TUP is sought and then proceed to Question 3. Name of the sponsoring organization Am-4-1an1 A-t_ L1 DAi s L1 u.I3 Type of Organization 5 C-2J c e. C.L t. P, (Service Club. Church. Social service Agency, etc.) 3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds t the sponsoring organization? 4- Yes (Please proceed to Question 4) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 4. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. A)tO t- A/ E mac— SS A-2 I L/ . - - No (Please proceed to Question 5) 5. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. 4—No (Please proceed to Question 6) 6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? - G Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. ?2ac —1 S 4-6—) 41 ✓ 44-,2.i o u,5 D 26, ii mt-I i o..L5 A-1 J h 1�2 o E> irvt 5 i Al A/ A-47 o A/ A- L f j , No (Please proceed to Question 7) 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes Year funds were received: Funds were used to: - No (P lease sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) flt. tO( 0S Date 9 MEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 17, 2005 AGENDA ITEM NO. 18 /)TEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - NATIONAL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE National City Safety Fair, Kimball Park, Saturday, September 17, 2005 from 0 until 2 p.m. PREPARED BY Rosi Gz, 336-4210 DEPARTMENT Building and Safety EXT. EXPLANATION This is a request from the National City Chamber of Commerce, N.C. Fire, and N.C. Police Departments to conduct the National City Safety Fair in Kimball Park from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., on Saturday, September 17, 2005. This event will display public safety equipment from the local Police and Fire departments, Border Patrol, National Guard, emergency medical response and Paradise Valley Hospital. Fire and police vehicles will be on display. The Chamber is requesting that the City's 1925 Seagrave fire truck be on display. The application and the event qualify for a waiver of fees pursuant to City Council Policy No. 704. ( Environmental Review X (—Financial Statement >STAFF RECOMMENDATION MIS Approval Approved By: Finance Director The City has incurred in costs $345 for processing the T.U.P. through various City departments and $320.00 for the Parks Division, total $665.00 Account No. Approve the Application for a Te rary ise hermit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval and grant the request for waiver of all fees and waive the 6-week requirement for use of the park. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and conditions of approval. A-200 (Rev. 7/03) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: National City Chamber of Commerce EVENT: National City Safety Fair DATE OF EVENT: Saturday, September 17, 2005 TIME OF EVENT: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. APPROVALS - PLANNING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS FINANCE COMMUNITY SERVICE POLICE PARKS ENGINEERING CITY ATTORNEY RISK MANAGER YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x ] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] YES [ x ] NO [ ] YES [x] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FIRE (619) 336-4550 • 1. Clear Fire Department access must be maintained at all times (no fire lanes are be blocked). 2. No cooking is allowed under tents/canopy's. 3. Tents over 200 square feet or canopy's over 400 square feet shall require a separate permite and inspection. 4. Landing Zone may be needed for helicopters. CITY ATTORNEY (619) 336-4220 * Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement, and a policy of general liability insurance, with the City and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with amounts of coverage to be determined by the Risk Manager. FINANCE (619) 336-4330 1. A Business License is required IF monies are solicited, admission fee is charged, or if food, beverages and merchandise are sold. The organization holding this event and each vendor present at this event must have a separate business license. Vendors currently licensed by the City may operate under their existing license. 2. A list of all participating vendors (with their address, phone number, and current National City business license number) is to be provided to the Revenue & Recovery Division of the Finance Department two weeks prior to the event for verification of business licenses. 3. If any of the vendors or organizations are registered not -for -profit, there will be no charge for a business license. However, a business license certificate must be obtained from the City Revenue & Recovery Division, Business License Section. (Note: a clearance fee does apply to Non-profit organizations located in National City that submit an initial business license application.) PARKS & REC. (619) 336-4290 1. No P.A. or stage required 2. Overtime: $320.00. RISK MANAGER (619) 336-4240 1. Minimum limits of one million dollars per occurrence of general liability insurance. 2. One million dollars for auto liability insurance including non -owned and hired auto. 3. That the City of National City, its officials, employees, agents and volunteers be named as additional insureds on above policy. 4. Standard hold harmless signed. (Done) POLICE (619) 336-4400 Police Department will be participating with vehicles, static display, etc. (THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL CITY AND SAN DIEGO TRANSIT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED VIA FAX 05/18/20051 City of National City Building & Safety Department 336-4210 April 1, 2005 TEMPORARY USE PERMIT APPLICATION EVENT: National City Safety Fair EVENT DATE: September 17, 2005 TO: PLANNING'¥/i '-ENGINEERING 4/4, OMMUNITYSERVICES151—'POLICE 4l15 ✓RISK MANAGER l/j' FINANCE 4111 ARE 50 ✓CITYATTORNEY 4,41 PARKS 40 £-pTBLIC WORKS* DUE DATE: ASAP PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED TEMPORARY USE PERMIT APPLICATION AND RETURN YOUR WRITTEN COMMENTS AND/OR APPROVAL TO THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT BY THE ABOVE DATE. THANK YOU, Rosie Gutierrez Building and Safety Department } :441 :",9 ^7'��'.r^a`T`yp'. it ^4c �'h .� . 4'-'��"'jjt ya G• •w'ij;{i {J ' L4Ny ryq!pVa'' ^:�,br ' he+.•wr".q w n` Y 4 °�. + ct�YM�1`Fi, «.+*.a •r" i'trdh +» t,i;.; ..Ng `r' « .:+'a'"HM ,Y++-'i#•s wrr Type of Event: _ Public Concert y Fair _ Festival _ Parade _ Demonstration _ Circus _ Motion Picture _ Grand Opening s Other Event Title: I V e\i 1° n'' C\ A y `I °j C l y Event Location: 1 1-, b�^ t1 °r k Event Date(s): From ' p P - n ?tc 5 f 1rr, Total Anticipated Attendance. by Month/Day/Year (_Participants) (_Spectators) Actual Event Hours: I 0 qr 'pm to - am/ Jm Setup/assembly/construction Date: - I e 19 Start time: 8 A ntl Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work. (specific details): V`^1'11( Sc (e\y tvLA., r',l\--1 fps,-, )°cql fir( poll G c tJ) for i (1.A co) N.110,,1 >Ui\\f}l^ey rrNvJ (.\ f Iri'3n4i 03r1"ny Dismantle Dates. ) ) 0S Completion Time: 14 am/ OS List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event. Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of reopening. +- i;J`r - cTA(...y711-1 f ..0.„.7,1` F' 'y �"��""�K'i" F*' 6 �: �it9'•`I.`v R.:' e 'iw-�-+ -1i-v» 01•,+-A &sr r•w41Y^`a iw3i-.r-i: l•t ww+1 ' 1�..>W.r'^�.�4N^Yr^4�.6 4.4 ,�Fh!..} tt' I, 7 � �+ i� ,� w• -.a � w r " � i A. �S', �'� +�>w ti • / r A � f j ry r. e � .� .1 l d j��, 1.T,r., t. NC °M V. orir,irU� Nc Sponsoring Organization: 4. N C e� I (U n ea ' Chief Officer of Organization (Name) C ' r b\\I .. r (A.1- f ) r ` For Profit Not -for -Profit Applicant (Name): IQ, 1 i o^ e 1 C C kg.M h lif- t f. Co N Vr Address: C 1 t e1 Itno) .)) ' (S 1 v c Daytime Phone: `� 7 )1.0 Evening Phone: ( ) Contact Person "on site" day of the event: Erie t1 V' L Pager/Cellular: NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST BE IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO CITY OFFICIALS 1 Fax: ((.4\) 17(1*)_So)� ��� {�k��:•SW+ 4-4 1Yy�spy 5v r ��j�g� y ` r.+:474', tV.r:7i4'TMY* 7i; :5'S'TT!i !*+ K'?"Sh,'A Apqi+ +W{a >f� Is your organization a "Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? YES _ NO Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? _ YES y NO If YES, please explain the purpose and provide amount(s): $ 3 , 0 U Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this event. (S p 0,,J or s).. i vs) $ 3 , 0 U Estimated Expenses for this event. $ What is the projected amount of revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive as a result of this event? r T r rry •T'" -�-�n 'T` 1- r�r �! -v� •+ '}� .'°nn 1 r •vr?a v �•+n. 1. r T"+T^• - r-�r� r•.• #n�?;,.�5i;.Mt9j'v5�a�fii �rwia,� b7i�'f�ilir4,s, R"�2 Y.L� .�ay7 yy• Y y '1 L .�,a - f 'n 1 0. 4 - •h� b>}yi ati y{J I y 11•Y F. V y -1 if -'.- Y 1' .*a n y '-w 1 1. a •.,� T- r., 7M•.�.x� e-,v R�-.i r J+ : { 1 Sr.t ' 4 + 7 �1 ..J. •t. . <{ . . sw.:. N•-_.% flrl nYM, di'r �t �- m r... .. v�^'+� v"J144- F"'T,'"A • Z1la-n��trT- — ... +•v «•. ja- m'v +eHs na.: ep.....m . va.v.- a y5n�i W Tea w],•tt ^H V'^'+•'_.. h2 _.,_ i°h•+� Y h wr. `i �" ar.+tY �rwh �a �. Y p.+♦, e+Aa s•N rI . A,i-tY r <.Q^. nr+T �<W ^�•4,;. r! 'kM i"S+Y.r . .., h. . { , .kW �n '�H 111 '4" Y•h p +q ". $ i , a ` • ,+ r _y 1 •, # Y„ r"iu ra � .1 Y kinnn v�7 �n 1 1`�T 1 T' '' `� •r�r a n mj• r' r '� C_-' 1 i 5 .}{'( - , ni�{:aJ # 1.r�,�r ,tq Isk lr.., l 1rr 7n ti_i _(+ Y, p '1.a+. ,{4,f %'• ♦ a i� 1, �r i"j I.. N... Please provide a DETAILED DESCRIPTION of your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides or any other pertinent information about the event. k ck 401 ot tr-,kf5i,ty v(ki - •\1r k fir Uck' , col(G v0,6 cl& s ( 01 0-trot, 119.1- -ft 0sa-(h)1 2 nip yy� �c`l ,r .� iriY` A r r•'. +'^�`*�!:-n. ea rvray�.� p�1j �..-i� fm as A`F*m k•+ a d.ry..c .r 'i�.di�. e•t*4 11i.1iii YES NO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? i YES _ NO Will items or services be sold at the event? If yes, please describe: ecAN,VSUk �u��kr ► ce Cfegr., cur,(-f YES NO Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. YES _ NO Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach adetailed site map showing all street impacted by the event. r rN e,, k a„ In addition to the route map required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and set-up locations for the following items: > Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession and/or Beer Garden areas. > Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas Please describe how food will be served at the event: I CA C f ° r^ c 0 n C,S If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: GAS ELECTRIC CHARCOAL _ OTHER (Specify): > Portable and/or Permanent Toilet Facilities Number of portable toilets: S (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there are facilities in the immediate area available to the public during the event) > Tables and Chairs ➢ Fencing, barriers and/or barricades ➢ Generator locations and/or source of electricity ➢ Canopies or tent locations (include tent/canopy dimensions) ➢ Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures ➢ Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages, grandstands or related structures > Vehicles and/or trailers > Other related event components not covered above ➢ Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be returned to a clean condition.) Number of trash cans: yE it 0 Trash containers with lids: Describe your plan for clean-up and removal of waste and garbage during and after the event: Ci-ty crc 3 r ,� ya ; vF Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Security:ur Qn\b�' V ot''�rnkCsr 0�krm i �' �'k�l( V _ YES/ NO Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangements for this event? If YES, please list Security Organization: Security Organization Address: Security Director (Name): Phone: _ YES NO Is this a night event? If YES, please state how the event and surrounding area will be illuminated to ensure safety of the participants and spectators: Please indicate what arrangement you have made for providing First Aid Staffing and Equipment. rt�‘ rcN\ S tr V3,1) pr(1(;A Please describe your Accessibility Plan for access at your event by individuals with disabilities: 0.2\ 1 i, P °4 1 n' or, h -) t o \\ r.v1.\\ �ox arr 7 F @ J �l �� �'FiHY h y ar �rnti� �M �F �rr'' �c-�ak 7 1t 71p P., : t i a. i 1, d - .,tam t' t' ' t 'ry ' i '�"+ , r ; ' �t. :t 1 ,:4 ,,y:11., t lei it Please provide a detailed description of your PARKING plan: S -\ �� r \ ��" ()° r k i ^ u ,, h“ )1. l bt °.A 4 i i i, r'TS� :1 -17.4.74W7.141r3 7.Z7 - .:1 1 Please describe your plan for DISABLED PARKING: Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event: NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. _ , w+r. tF' er.n t,.x,c nr 4� {ir. Vy;-..rv,T '.q wNr,�+w-a ,+, FN fib. +h'� Fuca a"4> as(� s4 C- 7 y aH 1'ik: IYY T'w+fi.4 Y�9 t{`T wiY:1 t1Y{. �. `✓MNY'4�+�I,Ad `4 f�K.h'H4-' Y..�rr 4nYr LJis�anWM�Iyt�'n '1 FM wp x+,r a+ h9 sfi 'r..i ��-'w+YJ4f 's".T°',Z Y`�4,--;4:41"4, vrt^ \M `( vI v a 1 r am' T{, j 1 r rM N w.Y � M✓- `B �. YV S'. P +•� � y �rt � 1 ,: �.. iy.a.��{ ».isN t n.', 9 w �M i�r p���.1�i1+.��`*f +n�-+- �tT��3' ''at'. 'ri ?i- o'��`GTji Kr+"14J�1-. yyyy _ YES X NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: Type of Music: _ YESi. NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Number of Bands: Start time: am/pm Finish Time am/pm _ YEA_ NO Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? If YES, please indicate: Start time: am/pm Finish Time am/pm Please describe the sound equipment that will be used for your event: _ YES ..NO Fireworks, rockets, or other pyrotechnics? If YES, please describe: _ YES .XNO Any signs, banners, decorations, special lighting? If YES, please describe: wj rc,o, (\A k)J Ig1S' Sec!'ol \ f r` E rn a l ,-)\ b d\ Q l. y� iNt u 1^1, 5 For Office Ilse Only Department Date Yes No Condition(s) of Approval Specific Conditions of Approval Initial 6 City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization N a" o.. Nl C4 t‘ i p t p r', t'-1, q Person in Charge of Activity l a n d\y„ k a l E f, C Q r c m Address \0\ (A,1 �' ck)c (11 v Nc 1O S0 Telephone (l °V" " ��� 39 Date(s) of Use S t Y i1 r r » 11-0 0 5 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The undersigned hereby agree(s) to hold the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City harmless and indemnify the City of National City and the Parking Authority of the City of National City from and against all claims, demands, costs, losses, damages, injuries, litigation and liability arising out of or related to the use of public property by permutes or permitee's agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Applicant c <<`NfiiV\ IttrA0—, Official Title Date For ice se my Certificate of Insurance Approved Date 7 REQUEST FOR A WAIVER OF FEES Non-profit organizations, which meet the criteria on page v of the instructions, will be considered for a waiver. If you would like to request a waiver of the processing fees, please complete the questionnaire below. 1. Is the event for which the TUP is sought sponsored by a non-profit organization? Yes (proceed to Question 2) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 2. Please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the TUP is sought and then proceed to Question 3. ' Name of the sponsoring organiza on N C C I-N^ 0.1 h 1' u (o r ('.it y fvC fn,NC Voli tA f)(rr Type of Organization (1 U ' P ^ U (Service Club, Church, social service Agency, etc.) 3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds t the sponsoring organization? Yes (Please proceed to Question 4) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 4. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides In or is employed in the city, and who is In dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. i� No (Please proceed to Question 5) 8 5. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. No (Please proceed to Question 6) 6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. X No (Please proceed to Question 7) 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes Year funds were received: Funds were used to: No (P lease sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) Signature 9 D-5 Date City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .EETING DATE May 17, 2005 AGENDA ITEM NO. 19 7 ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT - NATIONAL CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE National City Auto Heritage Day August 7, 2005 at Kimball Park PREPARED BY Rosie off errez, 336-4210 DEPARTMENT Building and Safety EXPLANATION This is a request from the National City Chamber of Commerce to conduct the National City Heritage Days Annual Parade of Vintage Cars and Auto Show in Kimball Park from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., on Sunday, August 7, 2005. The Parade of Vintage Cars will form at Cleveland Avenue and 20th Street at 8:30 a.m. Led by police reserves, the cars will drive down the Mile of Cars and past some historic homes, ending at Kimball Park at 10:00 a.m. There will also be food vendors, live international entertainment, games and local vendor booths. The Chamber is requesting to use the City's P.A. system and stage and requests that the City's 1925 Fire Engine be on display. City Council Policy No. 704 limits events in the park to a minimum of 6 weeks between events. The Lions Club 4a' of July event ends on July 4th leaving only 5 weeks between the events. The application and the event qualify for a waiver of fees pursuant to City Council Policy No. 704. i CEnvironmental Review Financial Statement X N/A Approved By: Finance Director The City has incurred in costs $345 for processing the T.U.P. through various City departments and $770.00 for the Parks Division, total $1,115.00 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Account No. Approve the Application for a Tempo/ary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval and grant the request for a waiver of all fees and waive the 6-week requirement for use of the park. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Application For A Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and conditions of approval. A-200 (9:99) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: National City Chamber of Commerce EVENT: National City Auto Heritage Days DATE OF EVENT: Sunday, August 7, 2005 TIME OF EVENT: 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. APPROVAIA. PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x PUBLIC WORKS YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FINANCE YES [x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x COMMUNITY SERVICE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] POLICE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x PARKS YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] ENGINEERING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] CITY ATTORNEY YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] RISK MANAGER YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FIRE (619) 336-4550 1. During the parade: • No Emergency access is to be blocked at any time. • Right-of-way shall be given immediately to all emergency vehicles. • No fire hydrants or other Fire Department Connections (FDC's) shall be blocked at any time. 2. At Kimball Park: • The above stipulations shall remain in effect. • Also, a site map shall be provided describing the layout of vehicles, food booths, emergency access routes, etc. Fire apparatus requires a 20-foot width and a 13-foot 6 inch vertical clearance. • Fire extinguishers with a 2A:10BC rating will be required at least every 75 feet. FINANCE (619) 336-4330 1. A Business License is required IF monies are solicited, admission fee is charged, or if food, beverages and merchandise are sold. The organization holding this event and each vendor present at this event must have a separate business license. Vendors currently licensed by the City may operate under their existing license. 2. A list of all participating vendors (with their address, phone number, and current National City business license number) is to be provided to the Revenue & Recovery Division of the Finance Department two weeks prior to the event for verification of business licenses. 3. If any of the vendors or organizations are registered not -for -profit, there will be no charge for a business license. However, a business license certificate must be obtained from the City Revenue & Recovery Division, Business License Section. (Note: a clearance fee does apply to Non-profit organizations located in National City that submit an initial business license application.) PARKS & REC. (619) 336-4290 1. Parks & Rec. will set up stage and provide trash containers. 2. Overtime for two staff for set-up and breakdown. Fee: $770.00. ENGINEERING (619) 336-4380 Ca11 Engineering Department at least 72 hours prior to the event for any necessary coordination with the contractors in the event of construction in the vicinity — call Charles at (619) 336-4380. CITY ATTORNEY (619) 336-4220 1. Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement, and a policy of general liability insurance, with the City and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with amounts of coverage to be determined by the Risk Manager. RISK MANAGER (619) 336-4240 1. Minimum limits of one million dollars per occurrence of general liability insurance. 3. One million dollars for auto liability insurance including non -owned and hired auto. 4. That the City of National City, its officials, employees, agents and volunteers be named as additional insureds on above policy. 5. Standard hold harmless signed. (Done) POLICE Use of Police Reserves as requested will be limited in numbers. Suggest private security hired by chamber to enhance security measures. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Street Division will post "No Parking" on Cleveland at a cost of $51.73. 2. Electrician and one (1) Custodian to set up electrical and event setups, at a cost of $450.00 3. Total Cost of Public Works: $501.73 (THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, NATIONAL CITY AND SAN DIEGO TRANSIT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED VIA FAX 05/18/2005) Type of Event _ Public Concert Fair _ Festival Community E X Parade _ Demonstration _ Circus _ Block Party _ Motion Picture _ Grand Opening _ Other Actual Event Hours: pm to 1/ Setup/assembly/construction Date: �/9/as Start time: 7:00A/4 Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details): ar 'or- itoo f Cra F?•f. ff/a c - cars= For r4e.r 07c7 by, r7 ah1409sys7; Dismantle Date: 170 S' Completion Time: S a List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of C/eue/aj,j Aver ciesred s- /✓eis fay in3 /fro.,, AVIlleoFC Mk/ pit r% /Vl /, r7 c1 �,^ . /cf-alr, ze ' if A. _ T./ Y' w 7 c o,-t, e r a T Event Title: /Va /)'0 /h r4/ Cs /'� 1.t�O /7C�-//�t q 0 7 Event Location: /�/ rr, c 2// ,q1,.. Event Date(s): Fnxry4y otal Anticipated Attendance: 6 64 6T near ( X Participants) (_Spectators) Sponsoring Organization: NATIONAL' CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE For Profit /� Z( Not -for -Profit Chief Officer of Organization (Name) CC./"O/y fi /(htf j-- Applicant (Name): �N/ATIONAI' CI?Y CHAR or / Address: .0/ /� a.�. a l3G.l C1 nigh va ,j /V. C. Can 919.re Daytime Phone: 0).927. 9337 Evening Ishone: 0) /V/Al Fax: 6/ yid SO/T Contact Person "on slte" day of the event: h P y C , 6/9. 29a. Pager/Cellular: 07 .J9a NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST BE IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO CITY OFFICIALS 1 Is your organization a "Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? % YES _ NO Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? YES _ NO If YES, please explain the purpose and provide amount(s): / 'i-AU/0 /L CYa(' Boo/ .30 Came, R007V:q0, 1) Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this event. $ /.5 9,2 -s Estimated Expenses for this event. $ , S%s What is the projected amount of revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive as a result of this event? Please provide a DETAILED DESCRIPTION of your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides or any other pertinent information about the event. 7 ceAirert /4 C.'_r Am f rr e uP L..,-77. Of/ries- w; // 6� j u diced .•h ?Pack. , 6 I- J.r c - A n, I % ev,j11.: 7 ",j r_ w ell ,re lure. Z17,4C1 l)1 ma: 3 anie.r f ni t,{471s1- coo*s w,1/ a /re i- G(i e-rT Al Mine_ C/3%.r /� v� �'r e. ' 4n , R er i� 0is�J,7/Aye 1/1, !l e P�di T /^G 1 ii e7 7Y.t, acre— ctL C �l i.%Ie.r G h rQ Cay,-.1% fi127 d u ,fry tie r Oh 1 ";; rn e l a ; Y, 2 YES NO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? YES _ NO Will items or services be sold at the event? If yes, please describe:( ; A itXs- a /7 ,a n a y YES _ NO Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. YES _ NO Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach a detailed site map showing all streets impacted by the event. In addition to the route map requited above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and set-up locations for the following items: ➢ Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession and/or Beer Garden areas. ➢ Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas n >> Please describe how food will be served at the event GYA e W/ 1/ be J71 It -do, a / oo1 J001X. If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: GAS)ELECTRIC ' CHARCOAL OTHER (Specify): ➢ Portable and/or Permanent Toilet Facilities Number of portable toilets: 6 (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there are facilities in the immediate area available to the public during the event) ➢ Tables and Chairs • Fencing, barriers and/or barricades > Generator locations and/or source of electricity ➢ Canopies or tent locations (indude tent/canopy dimensions) ➢ Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures > Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages, grandstands or related structures ➢ Vehicles and/or trailers > Other related event components not covered above D Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be retumed to a clean condition.) Number of trash cans:Pro ri AO Trash containers with lids: Describe your plan for clean-up and rem val of waste and garbage during and after the event: Uen 1nrs w/7/ de e n- bkQ, �iieiY AIf-eac.-tr 3 Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Intemal Security: G, 6d/i'c _ jRff.erves' _ YES)NO Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangements for this event? If YES, please list: Security Organization: Security Organization Address: Security Director (Name): Phone: _ YES O Is this a night event? If YES, please state how the event and surrounding area will be illuminated to ensure safety of the participants and spectators. Please indicate what arrangement you have made for providing First Aid Staffing and Equipment. Please describe your Accessibility Plan for access at your event by individuals with disabilities: d'p2 h r/' Are a, Please provide a detailed description of your PARKING plan: 612a Gi A71 Gt J-,iSJ' / Rabic 4 Please describe your plan for DISABLED PARKING: d'cL rk,ni i`J a va i /a -I Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event /1/ h. seMt h e jf A I J-/5 o0S ct&AZ NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. )YES _ NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: / yNumber of/Bands: I �— Type of Music: v/arbulyi/y t Scho S >-YES _ NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Start time: / 7 : 0 0 9/pm Finish Time 2 : ea _ YES Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? If YES, please indicate: Start time: amfpm Finish Time am/pm Please describe the sound equipment that will be used for your event _ YES ,NO Fireworks, rockets, or other pyrotechnics? If YES, please describe: _ YES [JO Any signs, banners, decorations, special lighting? If YES, please describe: 5 For Office 'Use OnCy Department Date Yes No Condition(s) of Approval Specific Conditions of Approval Initial 6 aoas Non-profit organizations, which meet the criteria on page v of the instructions, will be considered for a waiver. If you would like to request a waiver of the processing fees, please complete the questionnaire below. 1. Is the event for which the TUP is sought sponsored by a non-profit organization? X Yes (proceed to Question 2) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 2. Please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the TUP is sought and then proceed to Question 3. Name of the sponsoring organization NATIONAL CITY CEA:nE' or CC°;r..`.. Type of Organization Se - v; c ep Orion ; z.a�; •o ri (Service Club. Church, social Service Agency, etc.) 3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds t the sponsoring organization? X Yes (Please proceed to Question 4) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 4. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. No (Please proceed to Question 5) 8 5. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to city govemment such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. X No (Please proceed to Question 6) 6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. _ No (Please proceed to Question 7) 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes Year funds were received: Funds were used to: V No (P lease sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) Signature ate 9 E. 8th St. W. 14th St. t W. 16th St. W. 18th St. ri E. 18t St. .1. wool .4^ go E. 16th St. W. 30th St. E. 30th St RADE TIME: Arrive before • p- your vehicles. to SHOW TIME: :Show V, 4, eµ -, S- NOC.1 Cay RAI ODi ?,5 ohvelvald Sweetmto 1.TrAmisair E. 8th St. E. Plaza Blvd. KEY TO ROUTE masfampoomsaaam, First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Route Subject to Change ^,a-ort N 20th tst of 1 l'arlc nal City Blvd. e in National City. eaves at 8:45 to register and line ein ce before 10:00 (Entries after AM risk not judged.) r s presented :00 PM. VENDORS: Vendors must be set up in their assigned spaces 9-00 AM. _iETING DATE May 17, 2005 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 20 1.ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY - N.C. Relay for Life, August 20 - 21, 2005 PREPARED BY Ro ie ez 336-4210 DEPARTMENT Building and Safety EXPLANATION This is a request from the American Cancer Society to conduct the National City Relay for Life from August 20, 2005 at 10 am until August 21, 2005 at 10 a.m. This event is a community gathering aimed at the fight against cancer. The primary activity of the event is a 24-hour relay - walk on the track provided for the event. Teams will camp out and take turns walking around the track. The event will begin with a survivor lap to honor cancer survivors and in the evening, a luminaria ceremony will honor the survivors and remember those who lost their battle. Entertainment and activities for all participants will be available throughout the relay. The entertainment will consist of various family oriented groups performing on stage. The American Cancer Society requests the use of the stage. Amplified music will end at 9 p.m. A waiver of fees is requested. The event and sponsoring organization meet the criteria in City Council Policy No. 704 for waiver of fees. ( Environmental Review X WA Financial Statement The City has incurred $345.00 in costs in processing the T.U.P. i! igiP Finance Director through various City Departments and $630.00 ($945.00 if P.A. and stage are used) for the Parks Division, total $975.00 ($1,290.00 if P.A. and stage needed) Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temp of approval and grant the waiver of fees. Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS 1 Listed Below) Resolution No. L Application for a Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and Conditions of Approval. A-200 (9:99) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: American Cancer Society EVENT: National City Relay for Life DATE OF EVENT: August 20, 2005 to August 21, 2005 APPROVALS; PLANNING FIRE PUBLIC WORKS FINANCE COMMUNITY SERVICE POLICE PARKS & REC. ENGINEERING CITY ATTORNEY RISK MANAGER YES [x] YES [x] YES [x] YES [x] YES[x] YES [x] YES [x] YES [x] YES [x] YES [x] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ x SEE CONDITIONS [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: FIRE 336-4550 1. No emergency access shall be blocked at anytime during this event. 2. Do not block fire department connections, hydrants, or entryways. 3. Luminarias shall be monitored at all times while lit by responsible persons capable of immediately extinguishing any that get out of hand. PARKS & REC. 336-4290 1. If event set-up is completed on August 19th, 2005, the organization must provide security for the evening hours (5 p.m. to 7 a.m.). 2. Overtime fees for event are $630.00. If a stage and P.A. equipment are used, the overtime fee will be $945.00. CITY ATTORNEY Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement, and a policy of general liability insurance, with the City and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with amounts of coverage to be determined by the Risk Manager. FINANCE 336-4330 1. A Business License is required IF monies are solicited, admission fee is charged, or if food, beverages and merchandise are sold. The organization holding this event and each vendor present at this event must have a separate business license. Vendors currently licensed by the City may operate under their existing license. 2. A list of all participating vendors (with their address, phone number, and current National City business license number) is to be provided to the Revenue & Recovery Division of the Finance Department two weeks prior to the event for verification of business licenses. 3. If any of the vendors or organizations is registered not for profit, there will be no charge for the Business License. However, a business license certificate must be obtained from the City Revenue and Recovery Division, business license section. (Note: a clearance fee does apply to Non-profit organizations located in National City that submit an initial business license application.) RISK MANAGER 336-4240 1. Provide minimum limits of two million dollars per occurrence of general liability insurance. Insurance must provide coverage for relay participants. 2. That the City of National City, its officials, employees, agents and volunteers be named as additional insureds on the above policy. 3. Execute standard hold harmless with the City of National City (Done). 4. Relay participants must sign individual waivers agreeing to indemnify and hold the City of National City harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage arising out of or related to the use of Kimball Park. POLICE Private security is suggested to handle all security matters. Police could provide security on overtime basis with full recovery costs incurred by applicant. COMMUNITY SERVICES Community Services will be working with the applicant on this event, if it is approved by the City Council. (THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. AND NATIONAL CITY TRANSIT AND SAN DIEGO TRANSIT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED) Type of Event: Public Concert Parade Motion Picture Fair _ Demonstration _ Grand Opening R10EIV D _ Festival Community EvastB Circus Block Party rrtt 1 7 2005 Other NATIONAL MTV, CALM Event Title: AMC V C/n/ CANCE.Q, SocieT/, NAT' W4 (. c Iry RELAY Fa? L.1FE Event Location: t IMI3ALL PARK. Event Date(s): From 8/20/05 to 8/21 /o s Total Anticipated Attendance: 1/00 Month/Day/Year (304 Participants) Actual Event Hours: /0 &pm to ___/_0_10pm (/oo Spectators) Setup/assembly/construction Date: 8/ii /05 Start time: 12:0o Non/ Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details): SE'TuP STAGE, TENTS-Ch,J0?lc5, 5DoND SYSTEM kND 17kcK Fog -rrtE RELAY Dismantle Date: 8/21 /05 Completion Time: /2: 00 a List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event. Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of reopening. Sponsoring Organization: ,4/NERACAN C A/CER Soc/ETY 1 Ck DiV ,�'�• For Profit ✓Not -for -Profit Chief Officer of Organization (Name) PAT FELTS of STE1W / 8,2ovinik76 _ QFdio,vAL V. p. Applicant (Name): T/M FgAn/G& Address: ZG55 CAM inlo DEL gio labiZTH , STE . /ao , SP, c.4 `.a /0,8 Daytime Phone: (6/9) G; -7{/2-3 Evening Phone: ( ) Fax: (4 )2 J3- 3317 Contact Person "on site" day of the event: %/M >` AA/GE Pager/Cellular: - 7/ /3 NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST BE IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO CITY OFFICIALS 1 _ YES ✓NO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic beverages? YES ✓NO Will items or services be sold at the event? If yes, please describe: YES /NO YES NO ✓YES NO Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach a detailed site map showing all streets impacted by the event. Does the event involve the use of tents or canopies? If YES: Number of tent/canopies Sizes NOTE: A separate Fire Department permit is required for tents or canopies. YES NO Will the event involve the use of the City stage or PA system? Mhy$E • k/1cL ofristiniXrct quoTE$ apavt ours ipE v ODoRS /WO carel?Ala Prices vd/c �c In addition to the route map required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and set-up locations for the following items: > Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession and/or Beer Garden areas. > Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas Please describe how food will be served at the event: If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: GAS ELECTRIC CHARCOAL OTHER (Specify): > Portable and/or Permanent Toilet Facilities Number of portable toilets: 3 (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there are facilitiesin e immediate area available to the public during the event) Z % > Tables and Chairs > Fencing, barriers and/or barricades > Generator locations and/or source of electricity ➢ Canopies or tent locations (include tent/canopy dimensions) ➢ Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures ➢ Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages, grandstands or related structures ➢ Vehicles and/or trailers ➢ Other related event components not covered above ➢ Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and immediately upon conclusion of the event the area must be returned to a clean condition.) Number of trash cans: /o Trash containers with lids: Describe your plan for clean-up and removal of waste and garbage during and after the event: ACS /TAfF Ar(D vot,,Wi rrE FP < tZES g5i8 LE FOR- CGE�4v - vP pW p gEt41DVAL, o e 7121 3 Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event: Lou- 5Sut k cgrree NoT I FYM 6 /fa_ Res 'Pours 3051) E5 *JD CrtUP-40155 2 /hc-r o *THE EVeNT. NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: / Number of Bands: 3 -5 Type of Music: VA lous-FAM,Ly oP1 ,QED MUSIC YES _ NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Start time: /O'. D 0 pm Finish Time 9:00 YES _ NO Will sound checks be conducted prior to the event? If YES, please indicate: Start time: 9-'OD Cal/pm Finish Time /0:00 ar pm Please describe the sound equipment that will be used for your event: _ YES ✓ NO Fireworks, rockets, or other pyrotechnics? If YES, please describe: YES _ NO Any signs, banners, decorations, special lighting? If YES, please describe: D/2cCT/ophfl, SIG,/AGE fitJD AME aicA70 CAAxE2 Sac/ET)/ aitNNE1l ,q.up Sl6tJ k6E Revised 10/3/01 5 City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization ,41.1E ICE CAJJCE2 SoC/ETV l C,4 D/v., TOc' Person in Charge of Activity T M Fr A/0CE Address ZGSS Crfi nNo DEt- g to , Io tl Ste. too , SD. cA 92 i0£3 Telephone 64-G8a-74,23 Date(s) of Use 8/l9 /Zoos- 8/zi /In s HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT As a condition of the issuance of a temporary use permit to conduct its activities on public or private property, the undersigned hereby agree(s) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City and the Parking Authority and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims; demands, costs, losses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage, or both, or any litigation and other liability, including attorneys fees and the costs of litigation; arising out of or related to the use of public property or the activity taken under tye permit by the permittee or its agents, employees or contractors. r For Office Use Only Certificate of Insurance Approved Date 7 5. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. t/No (Please proceed to Question 6) 6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. l/No (Please proceed to Question 7) 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes Year funds were received: Funds were used to: V No (P lease sign the form and submit It with the TUP Applicafon) Signature Date 9 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT :ETING DATE May 17, 2005 21 AGENDA ITEM NO. (ITEM TITLE Continued Public Hearing - Proposed Subdivision and Planned Unit Development for 21 Single -Family Residential Parcels on a 6-Acre Vacant Site Southwest of the Southerly Terminus of Rachael Avenue. (Applicant: Pacific Scene Homes) (Case File #: S 2004-12 / PUD 2004-01 / IS 2004-09) PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Mary Jo Wils , cipal-Planner. Ext. 4319 Planning EXPLANATION At the May 3, 2005 City Council meeting, the Council continued the application to the May 17, 2005 meeting to allow additional time for the Council to review the proposed project. J CEnvironmental Review (-Financial Statement N/A N/A Mitigated Negative Declaration Approved By: N/A >STAFF RECOMMENDATIQp1 Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission A r Finance Director Account No. N/A BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map, Planned Unit Development and MitigatedtipNegative Declaration: Vote (Ayes - Pruitt, Carrillo, Alvarado, Baca, Flores, Marinelli, Reynolds, fliahaui) (Abstain - S`alud u,,a) ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 2005 11 1. A-200 and all associated attachments from May 3, 2005 City Council meeting A-200 (9:99) BACKGROUND REPORT Site Characteristics: The proposed subdivision is located on a 6-acre vacant site southwest of the southerly terminus of Rachael Avenue. The project site is comprised of two lots which create an irregular shape and are located in the Single -Family -Extendable -Planned Unit Development (RS-3-PUD) Zone. The only access to the site is from Rachael Avenue with 31-feet of street frontage. The project site contains moderate to steeply sloping topography. There are two canyons on -site. The primary canyon trends in a northwest -southeast direction and is located near the center of the property. The canyon bottom is located at the southwestern border of the project site. A smaller finger canyon extends from the primary canyon to the northeast within the central portion of the site. Disturbed non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub habitat occur on the property. The site is located at the easterly edge of the City. The existing land uses include single-family to the north, east and south. The City of San Diego is adjacent to the east and south. There are City of San Diego recreation ball fields to the south. The County of San Diego is to the west of the property with single- family homes to the southwest and miscellaneous commercial uses to the northwest. The City of National City Combined General Plan/Zoning Map designates this area as Pre -Zone RS-2, since it is in the City's Sphere of Influence. Proposed Use: The applicant proposes to divide the property into 24 individual lots; one lot for the private road to serve the homes, a lot for the common landscaping, one lot for an open space area consisting of the existing natural canyon in the western portion of the project site and 21 lots for the development of single-family homes. The lots would have access from Rachael Avenue via a private road. The road width would range from 24-26-feet and includes two hammerhead designed turnarounds, adequate for emergency vehicles. The applicant is requesting an exception for the allowance for a private street. The common landscaping is located around the perimeter of the residential lots. The open space lot is approximately 3.5-acres in size, more than half the entire project site size. This area will retain the natural vegetation and provide a desirable view for future residents. The 2-1 lots proposed for residential single-family development will all be generally rectangular in shape and range is size from 2,800 to 4,600 square -feet with 40-feet of street frontage. The applicant is requesting an exception from the minimum lot size requirement of 5,000 square -feet and from the minimum street frontage of 50-feet. Each home would be two -stories tall and would include an attached two -car garage. Such amenities include arched doorways, fireplaces, grid window design, wood fascia trim for windows and doors on all sides of the homes, and over -sized garages (average 460 square -feet). All of the homes would have gable and hip roofs and a stucco finish with barrel roof tiles. There are two floor plans with an option to add a fifth bedroom to Plan 2. There are six color/architectural schemes for the homes. The floor plan details are shown below: Size Bedrooms Bathrooms Plan 1 1,940 sq. ft. + 2-car garage 4 2%z Plan 2 2,105 sq. ft. + 2-car garage 4 2 Y2 Plan 2A 2,314 sq. ft. + 2-car garage 5 2%z All of the homes would have 10 to 30-foot front yard setbacks, with an average of 16-feet, from the proposed private street. The applicant is requesting an exception from the required 20-foot front yard setback. The rear yard setbacks range from 10 to 20-feet deep. Most of the homes would have a private rear yard of approximately 15-feet in depth. All of the homes will have sideyard setbacks of 5-feet. The garage for each home will be accessible from the private street at the front of each home. Substantial grading and the installation of retaining walls will be necessary to create stable level building pads for the lots and the private street. With the installation of the retaining walls, the private common space for the homes will be level and usable. The retaining walls for the private street also create grades which are adequate and accessible for the residents and emergency vehicles. There is also a retaining wall between the open space lot (lot 24) and the common landscaping lot (lot 23). The retaining walls will consist of masonry block ranging in height from 4 to 24-feet. In addition to the common landscaping around the perimeter of the development area, the front yards of the residences would also be landscaped. Analysis: The proposed subdivision and development of single-family homes is consistent with several General Plan goals, such as the creation of home ownership opportunities, high quality design, development of homes for larger families, infitl of vacant property with residential development and preservation of open space areas. Additionally, the proposed density, 3.5 units per acre, is less than the 8.7 units per acre allowed under the Single -Family -Extendable -Planned Unit Development Combined General Plan/Zone designation. As noted above, the development achieves several important goals of the City, which would not be possible without the requested exceptions as a part of the Planned Unit Development. The requested exceptions from the Land Use Code include: 1) use of a private street; 2) lot sizes less than 5,000 square -feet; 3) street frontage less than 50-feet; and 4) a reduction of front yard setbacks. These requests apply to the newly created 21 residential lots and the private street lot. With these exceptions, the project remains functional and provides for good development. The project includes several characteristics (private streets, small lots, and common open space) typical ofa small planned unit development. Each home will have a useable, private yard and a two -car garage. The development will not infringe upon the existing surrounding development which includes single-family homes to the north, east and south and the commercial properties to the west, since there are adequate setbacks (including the 3.5 acre open space area that separates the homes from the properties to the west and south). The open space area will provide a desirable view of the natural canyon for future residents. The front yard area will be landscaped with a mix of groundcover, shrubs and trees. Per Section 18.54.050 of the National City Municipal Code each residential lot shall be landscaped from the front property line to the rear wall of the structure. Staff has included a condition of approval requiring that the landscaping be installed to the rear wall of the structure. The applicant has indicated that the retaining walls on -site will be planted with climbing vines to reduce their visual bulk. To ensure that the appropriate landscaping is installed, staff suggests including a condition referring to Attachment 8, which depicts the landscaping detail for the walls. While there is a variety of common landscaping throughout the project, the open space lot will be retained with natural vegetation. Since this area will be preserved, staff is suggesting the addition of a condition of approval to remove the debris, historic fill and invasive plants within the area and plant additional native plants to preserve the natural beauty of the canyon and enhance view for the new residents. There is an existing 15-inch sewer line located within the canyon in the southwestern portion of the property. The line runs north -south. The sewer line will remain in place and not be modified as a part of this proposal. The development, including the nearby retaining wall, will not impact this existing sewer line. The sole access to the site is from Rachael Avenue (local residential collector street) which has sufficient width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the project. The development of 21 new single-family homes will generate approximately 200 average daily trips (ADT) which can be adequately served by Rachael Avenue. The proposed homes comply with Land Use Code requirements, including height, parking and private useable space and incorporate several elements encouraged by City Design Guidelines. Each home has varied and interesting rooflines and wall plane variation, and will be constructed of high quality materials, such as stucco exteriors, wood fascia trim for all windows and doors and barrel roof tiles. The homes will have a varied exterior appearance, since there are six different architectural exterior treatments. The standard conditions of approval from the Engineering Department and Sweetwater Authority have been included as Attachment 4. Environmental Review: This project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the protection of environmental resources. Two sensitive habitats, non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub, were discovered by the project Biologist on -site as a part of this review. The impacted area of the habitat is considered disturbed and degraded. While the habitat is degraded, it is still considered a sensitive resource and the loss of these habitats must be mitigated. Therefore, approximately 0.75 acres of impacted non- native grasslands and 1.75 acres of impacted coastal sage scrub will be mitigated in an off -site approved mitigation bank as suggested by the California Department of Fish and Game. In addition, approximately 3.5 acres of the overall site, which includes the primary canyon feature and quality coastal sage scrub habitat will be retained as open space. Based on the review of the environmental resources on -site and associated mitigation measures, a Mitigated Negative Declaration (please see Attachment 5) was prepared for the project. The 30-day public review period ended on March 28, 2005. The City did not receive any comments during the review period. 3 Planning Commission Hearing: The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this proposal on April 4, 2005. There were five residents who spoke at the hearing, including two residents from National City and three from the City of San Diego. The concerns expressed by the residents included access to the project site, police and fire response and the ability for children to continue to use the property to access the ball -fields located to the south of the project site in the City of San Diego. The Commission clarified that Rachael Avenue would be the only road used to access the new homes and the Police and Fire Departments are informed that these new homes are within the City limits and are served by National City. The Commission discussed the possibility of retaining a pedestrian pathway for access to the ball -fields and asked that the applicant review the issue. At the time this report was prepared, the applicant was researching this issue. The Commission voted to recommend approval of the proposal findings for the development of 21 new single-family residences homes consistent with the General Plan and a benefit to the residents of the City. As a part of the motion, the Commission added a condition of approval requiring an additional parking space if a 5th bedroom was constructed on any of the 2A floor plans. This additional condition is consistent with the recent Land Use Code Amendment that the Council adopted on April 5, 2005 which requires an additional parking space for a single-family home greater than 2,500 square -feet in size or has 5 or more bedrooms. RESOLUTION NO. 11-2005 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR 21-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PARCELS ON A 6-ACRE VACANT SITE SOUTHWEST OF THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF RACHAEL AVENUE APPLICANT: PACIFIC SCENE HOMES CASE FILE NO. S-2004-12/PUD-2004-01/IS-2004-09 WHEREAS, application was made for approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Unit Development for on property generally described as: The portion of Tract 600 of Lincoln Acres Annex No. 3, Map 1754, and Parcel 2 of Parcel Map No. 6476, all in the City of National City, County of San Diego, State of California WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, considered said application and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-2004-09 at a duly advertised public hearing held on April 4, 2005, at which time the Planning Commission considered oral and documentary evidence; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing(s) the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. S-2004-12, PUD-2004-01 and IS-2004-09 which is maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference; along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action hereby taken is found to be essential for the preservation of the public health, safety and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence introduced in the staff report and public hearing for said Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Unit Development support the following findings: TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP FINDINGS 1. The proposed map will not have a significant effect on the environment with the incorporation of the proposed Mitigation Measures as conditions of approval and adopt the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration. 2. The proposed map is consistent with the National City General Plan, including Specific Plans since the General Plan / Zone designation for the project site is Single -Family Extendable -Planned Unit Development (RS-3-PUD) which provides for the creation of home ownership opportunities, high quality design, development of homes for larger families, infill of vacant property with residential development and preservation of open space. There are no Specific Plans that are applicable to the project site. 3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development, since the Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the project does not identify any geologic hazards that make the site unsuitable for two-story residential development. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, since the proposed 21 units (3.5 units per acre) is less than the 8.7 units per acre as allowed in the RS-3-PUD zone. 5. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, since the disturbed non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub habitat on -site will be mitigated in an off -site mitigation bank and the remaining quality coastal sage scrub will be retained in an open space easement on -site. 6. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, since all necessary public services will be provided. 7. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the proposed subdivision, since no such easements are located on the site. 8. The discharge of sewerage waste from the subdivision into the City of National City sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California Regional Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of the Water Code, as specified by Government Code Section 66474.6. 9. The subdivision has been considered by the Planning Commission with regard to its effect on the housing needs of the region, and these needs are balanced by the public service needs of the residents and available fiscal and environmental resources. 10. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision, based on consideration of local climate, topography, property configuration and other design and improvement requirements without requiring reduction in allowable density or lot coverage. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FINDINGS 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the site can accommodate 21 good-sized residential units, with abundant open space. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since 21 new homes will generate approximately 200 average daily trips (ADT) which can be adequately served by Rachael Avenue which is a local residential collector street. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the traffic generated by the project can be absorbed by the existing roads in the area, and since single-family characteristics integrated into the project will allow it to harmonize with the existing development. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since 21 new homeownership opportunities will be created in a region facing a growing demand for additional housing. REQUESTED EXCEPTIONS FINDINGS Granting of the exceptions is in accordance with the intent and purposes of this Title, and is consistent with the General Plan and with all specific plans or other plans of the City, since the General Plan encourages the creation of home ownership opportunities, high quality design, development of homes for larger families, infill of vacant property with residential development and preservation of open spaces area, which the requested exceptions facilitate, and since the functional design of the proposed subdivision is compatible with adjacent and nearby development consistent with the intent of this Title. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-2004-09) together with any comments received during the public review process, and finds on the basis of the whole record (including the Initial Study and any comments received) that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis, and hereby approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration and authorizes the filing of a Notice of Determination. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, based on the findings hereinbefore stated, the Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of said Tentative Subdivision Map and Planned Unit Development for 21-single family residential parcels on a 6-acre vacant site southwest of the southerly terminus of Rachael Avenue, subject to the following conditions: 1. This Tentative Subdivision Map authorizes the division of 2 lots into 24 lots, with exceptions for the creation of a private street, reduction of the required street frontage, lot less than the minimum 5,000 square -feet, and reduced front yard setbacks. Lots 1-21 shall be developed with single-family homes, Lot 22 shall be developed as the private street, Lot 23 shall be developed as the common landscape area and Lot 24 shall be developed as the open space lot to preserve the quality coastal sage scrub habitat and natural canyon feature. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibits A-2nd revision, Case File no. S 2004-12 / PUD 2004-01, dated February 1, 2005. 2. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan, including plant types, methods of planting, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant planting and water conserving irrigation devices. 3. The CC&R's shall contain a clause that allows the City the right, but not the duty, to enforce the maintenance obligations of the condominium association regarding maintenance of landscape 7 and the external appearance of the common areas, and, when required to be installed, on -going maintenance of any storm water treatment facility. The clause shall allow the City to lien the association property and each individual parcel in the event the City elects to perform such maintenance. The City Attorney shall approve the form of the language contained in such clause. 4. The developer shall provide a declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, running with the land, clearly setting for the privileges and responsibilities, including maintenance, payment of taxes, etc. involved in the common ownership of streets, surface parking areas, and open spaces prior to approval of the Final Map. The CC&R's shall include a determination that the funds provided by the maintenance provisions will be sufficient to cover all contemplated costs. 5. A corporation, association, property owners' group, or similar entity shall be formed with the right to assess all the properties which are jointly owned with interests in the common areas and facilities in the entire development to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded conditions, covenants, and restrictions approved by the City Attomey as to form and content, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs and services. 6. Plans must comply with the 2001 editions of the California Building Code, the California Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Electrical Code, and California Title 24 energy and accessibility regulations. 7. A Hydrology Study (100 year flood) is required for the new project. The study should consider the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection point. The study should consider the adequacy of the existing storm drain system to convey any additional run-off. All Hydrology study findings and recommendations are part of Engineering Department requirements. 8. A Grading and Drainage Plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on - site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of stoma water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public stonn drain system from the proposed development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the development, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. The checklist for preparation of the Grading and Drainage Plan and Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) are available at the Engineering Department. 9. Separate street and sewer plans prepared by Registered Civil Engineer, shall be submitted showing all of the existing and proposed improvements. The plans shall be in accordance with City requirements. 10. All surface run-off, including landscape irrigation within the public right-of-way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface run-off resulting from this development. h 11. A Soils Engineering Report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review, after Planning Commission approval. The Report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City modified Standard Drawing G-24. All soils report findings and recommendations shall be part of the Engineering Department requirements. 12. A Sewer Permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the Grading Plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 13. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and any grading construction on private property. 14. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. 15. The driveway on Rachael Avenue shall be an alley entrance type driveway with pedestrian ramps. 16. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required for discharge of storm water runoff associated with construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in a land disturbance. A construction stormwater permit shall be obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. A copy of the permit shall be given to the National City Engineering Department prior to any work beginning on the project. 17. The Final Map shall meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and the City of National City Municipal Codes including certification, acknowledgement, complete boundary information and monumentation. 18. The subdivider shall submit an approval letter from Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements have been met. If additional improvements are needed, the developer shall enter into an agreement for the water improvements with the Authority prior to obtaining the final map approval. 19. Separate water and sewer laterals shall be provided to each dwelling. 20. The developer shall bond for the monumentation, the public improvements and the on -site grading, drainage, landscaping, and other improvements through an agreement with the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. 21. All utility distribution facilities within the boundaries of the subdivision, and within the half street abutting the new subdivision, shall be placed underground. 22. The Final Map shall be recorded prior to issuance of any Building Permit. 23. All new property line survey monuments shall be set on private property, unless otherwise approved. 24. The Final Map shall use the California Coordinate System for its "Basis of Bearings" and express all measured and calculated bearings in terms of the system. The angle of grid divergence from a true meridian and the north point shall appear on the map. Two measured ties from the boundary of the property to existing horizontal control stations shall be shown. 25. Television cable companies shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to filling of cable trenches. 26. Exterior walls of buildings/freestanding fences/retaining walls to a height of not less than 6-feet shall be treated with a graffiti resistant coating subject to approval from the Building and Safety Director. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its observance. 27. The property owner shall submit a letter to the Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements. The owner shall enter into an agreement with the Authority for any water facility improvements required for the proposed project. 28. The property owner shall submit a set of water main design plans and profile for review and approval by Sweetwater Authority Engineering Department prior to Building Permit issuance. 29. Focused survey(s), performed by a qualified Biologist, shall be conducted prior to the commencement of construction to determine if the species, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, occurs on the project site. If the presence of such species is found to occur on -site, the recommendations of the Biologist shall be incorporated into the project. 30. If construction is to occur between January la — September 30th, a survey of nesting birds, prepared by a certified Biologist, shall be completed prior to the commencement of construction to determine if there are bird nesting sites on the project site or within the vicinity. If bird nesting sites have been determined by a certified Biologist, construction can commence following the recommendations of the Biologist, including, but not limited to, the protection of such nesting sites a minimum distance of 300-feet. 31. The 0.75 acres of impacted non-native grasslands on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1:1. 32. The 1.75 acres of impacted, coastal sage scrub on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.5:1. 33. The artificial fill, residual soil, and alluvial deposits shall be removed from the site and replaced with structural fill. 34. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the National City Planning Department prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 35. The residential lots shall be landscaped from the front property line to the rear wall of the structure. 36. A climbing vine plant species shall be planted on the retaining walls to reduce the visual bulk as depicted on Attachment 9 of the staff report prepared for the Planning Commission hearing on April 4, 2005 and to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. ID 37. The open space lot (Lot 24) shall be cleared of debris, historic fill and invasive plants and additional native plants shall be planted to preserve the natural canyon to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 38. Prior to recordation of the Final Map the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attomey and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 39. Approval of the tentative subdivision map expires two (2) years after adoption of the resolution of approval at 5:00 p.m. unless prior to that date a request for a time extension not exceeding three (3) years has been filed as provided by National City Municipal Code §17.04.070. 40. One additional on -site parking space (in addition to the 2 garage parking spaces) shall be provided for any unit exceeding four bedrooms. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 18, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: PRUITT, CARRILLO, ALVARADO, BACA, FLORES, MARTINELLI, REYNOLDS, GRAHAM NAYS: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SALUDARES CHAIRWOMAN // City of National City Department of Public Works 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4580 (619) 336-4380 Fax: (619) 336-4397 ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REVIEW OF SITE PLANS AND TENTATIVE MAPS UNDER VARIOUS PLANNING DEPARTMENT PERMITS Date: October 14, 2004 To: Andrew Hoskinson, Planning Department From: Adam J. Landa, Assistan Civil Engineer Cam'• ot,I Via: Stephen M. Kirkpatric. A tmg Director of Public Works/City Engineer Subject: CONDOS ON RACHAEL AVENUE AND BLUERIDGE STREET 1. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A private storm water treatment maintenance agreement shall be signed and recorded. The checklists for preparation of the grading plan drainage plan and Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) are available at the Public Works Department. 2. All surface run-off, including landscaping irrigation within the public right-of- way, shall be collected by approved drainage facilities and directed to the street by sidewalk underdrains or a curb outlet. Adjacent properties shall be protected from surface run-off resulting from this development. 3. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Public Works Department's review, after Planning Commission approval. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the 6) Recycled Paper Planning Department October 14, 2004 Page 2 maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch Class If aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City modified Standard Drawing G-24. All soils report findings and recommendations shall be part of the Public Works Department requirements. 4. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 5. The driveway on Rachael Avenue shall be an alley entrance type driveway with pedestrian ramps. 6. A permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and any grading construction on private property. 7. A cost estimate shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment. The deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours. 8. A title report shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, after the Planning Commission approval, for review of all existing easements and the ownership at the property. 9. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit is required for discharged of storm water runoff associated with construction activity where clearing, grading, and excavation results in a land disturbance. A construction stormwater permit shall be obtained from the Regional Water Quality Control Board. A copy of the permit shall be given to the City of National City Public Works Department prior to any work beginning on the project . 14 Planning Department October 14, 2004 Page 3 FINAL MAP REQUIREMENTS 1. The final map shall meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and the City of National City Municipal Codes including certification, acknowledgement, complete boundary information and monumentation. 2. The subdivider shall submit an approval letter from Sweetwater Authority stating fire flow requirements have been met. If additional improvements are needed, the developer shall enter into an agreement for the water improvements with the Authority prior to obtaining the final map approval. 3. The developer shall bond for the monumentation, the public improvements and the on -site grading, drainage, landscaping, and other improvements through an agreement with the City prior to the approval of the final map. 4. All utility distribution facilities within the boundaries of the subdivision, and within the half street abutting the new subdivision, shall be placed underground. 5. The final map shall be recorded prior to issuance of any building permit. 6. All new property line survey monuments shall be set on private property, unless otherwise approved. 7. The final map shall use the California Coordinate System for its `Basis of Bearings" and express all measured and calculated bearings in terms of the system. The angle of grid divergence from a true meridian, and the north point shall appear on the map. Two measured ties from the boundary of the property to existing horizontal control stations shall be shown. AL:jha rachael REV. 6/04 xc: Din Daneshfar /5 SWEETWATER AUTHORITY 505 GARRETT AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91912-2328 (619) 420-1413 FAX (619) 425-7469 http://www.sweetwater.org October 7, 2004 Mr. Andrew Hoskinson, Associate Planner City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY SOUTH END OF RACHAEL AVENUE, NATIONAL CITY (A. P.N. 564-080-34-00 AND 564-080-12-00) CASE NOS.: S-2004-1/PUD-2004-1/IS-2004-9 (21 HOMES) SWA DEV. FILE: CANYON VIEW CONDOS Dear Mr. Hoskinson: GOVERNING BOARD JAMES *JIM' DOUD, CHAIR W.D.'BUD' POCKLINGTON, VICE CHAIR FL MITCHEL BEAUCHAMP NICK INZUNZA MARGARET COOK WELSH RICHARD A. REYNOLDS JAMES C. ALKIRE WANDA AVERY TREASURER MARISA FARPON-FRIEDMAN SECRETARY This letter is in response to the Application for Tentative Subdivision Map and Conditional Use Permit for the subject project within the Sweetwater Authority (Authority) service area. There is a 6-inch water main located on the west side of Rachael Avenue that ends approximately thirty (30) feet before the project's north property line that will have to be extended into the project (as shown on the Tentative Map). The Authority's records indicate that there are no existing water services to this project. A separate letter regarding the Authority's design requirements and the development process will be sent to the Owner/Developer. Please note that the water main extension will be a public main located in an easement on private property, and the easement will be approximately 32 feet wide. Enclosed is a copy of a portion of 1/4 SEC. 108 map that shows the existing water facilities near the project area. At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide fire protection for this project. The 6-inch water main in Rachael Avenue may not provide adequate fire flow and may need to be replaced with a larger diameter pipe to meet the fire flow required by the National City Fire Department. As plans develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements, as well as a site plan, street improvement plan, irrigation plan, plumbing plan (showing total fixture -unit count), fire sprinkler plans, and calculations (if required). Based on this requirement, this project may result in the need for new water systems or substantial alteration to the existing water system. The Authority recommends that your Agency work with ours to determine if the existing water facilities are adequate to meet the added demands prior to issuing a building permit. If grey water systems are proposed for this development, the Authority will require the installation of Reduced Pressure Principle Backflow Assemblies at all meter locations. If the Developer proposes the use of common meters, or designated irrigation meters, the same type of backflow protection will be required. Additionally, if individual fire protection systems are planned, approved double check valves must be installed at meters serving each proposed residence. A Public WaterAgency Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas Mr. Andrew Hoskinson Re: Water Availability — Canyon View Condos October 7, 2004 Page 2 of 2 If the Owner provides the required fire flow information, and enters into an agreement for water facility improvements with the Authority, water service can be obtained at a pressure ranging from a maximum of 95 p.s.i. to a minimum of 87 p.s.i., due to the varying elevations contained in the parcels. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Laurie Edwards at (619) 409-6758. Sincerely, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY Hector Martinez Engineering Manager HM:LJE:vls Enclosure: Copy of portion of 1/4 SEC. 108 map Pc: Mr. Jeff Bums National City Fire Department 333 E. 16th Street National City, CA 91950 Mr. Nabeel and Wissam Kassab 1130 San Bemardino Avenue Spring Valley, CA 91977 Mr. Anthony Ambrose Burkett and Wong 3434 Fourth Avenue San Diego, CA 92103 Mr. Allen Eads Pacific Scene Homes 2505 Congress Street, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92110 Mr. Rick Bird, Sweetwater Authority I:\engr\Dev\Canyon View Condos \Cor\canyonviewcondos wtravl.doc /7 Subject Property Canyon View Subdivision Nachos( Ave. & Blueridge National City 1/4 SEC.108 7M.resmrirspdb l..M..t eAMlrb *stars' only OS 1r owl 2t sot .w sly rrpp AwP.w 1r Ianlwwnisla a . -tlbnwwr..w..M.rRI ▪ GlamIllwrir Or210410, CA 1r12-2121 pulsto-aa FAX: 0110)42s1400 t.0 Mwr,Yir. on germ& 000, bend Muni,toodIon,y sWNW Fors Ybrrb.. Cal USA 01ams224133 .Iodlp pbrbewlbi n rparcel ameddle Morn on N. 011 Y fernYlcs wood Its atFN_ .sket» ar-„ a . oer111IK..tMI.I.dI r11r1.31. .r 1 00ima a a.rr, Wu 130A 30001000, CA e$O1-4003 SCALE: 1 INCH = 200 FEET Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Appendix C Mail to: State Clearinghouse, P. O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 For Hand Delivery/Street Address: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 SCH # Project Title Canyon Views Subdivision and Development of 21 Single -Family Residential Parcels (IS 2004-09) Lead Agency; City of National City Contact Person: Mary Jo Wilson, AICP Mailing Address: 1243 National City Boulevard Phone: 619-336-4319 City: National City Zip: 91950 County: San Diego Project Location: County: San Diego City/Nearest Community: National City Boss Streets: Southern terminus of Recheel Avenue betwwen Bluebird Street & Lydia Street Assessor's Parcel No.: 564'080-34 & 564-080-12 Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: 805 Airports: N/A Section: Twp.: Range: Waterways: Sweetwater River Flood Control Channel Railways: N/A Zip Code: 91950 Base: Schools: rrxrievnix I. Hawk Mee. lee & Pertlwtak BrneMry Document Type: CEQA: 0 NOP ❑ Early Cons ❑ Neg Dec 0 Mit Neg Dec ❑ Draft EIR ❑ Supplement/Subsequent EIR (Prior SCH No.) ❑ Other NEPA: ❑ NOI ❑ EA ❑ Draft EIS ❑ FONSI Other: 0 Joint Document ❑ Final Document ❑ Other Local Action Type: ❑ General Plan Update ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ General Plan Element ❑ Community Plan ❑ Specific Plan ❑ Master Plan O Planned Unit Development ❑ Site Plan ❑ Rezone 0 0 Prezone 0 ❑ Use Permit ❑ O Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) ❑ Annexation Redevelopment Coastal Permit Other Development Type: kg Residential: Units 35 ❑ Office: Sq.ft. ❑ Commercial: Sq.ft. 0 Industrial: Sq.ft. ❑ Educational 0 Recreational Acres t Acres Employees Acres Employees Acres Employees Total Acres (approx.) 6 ❑ Water Facilities: Type MGD ❑ Transportation: Type ❑ Mining: Mineral ❑ Power. Type MW ❑ Waste Treatment: Type MGD ❑ Hazardous Waste: Type 0 Other: Project Issues Discussed in Document: ❑ AestheticNisual 0 ❑ Agricultural Land 0 ❑ Air Quality 0 ❑ Archeological/Historical 0 • Biological Resources 0 ❑ Coastal Zone ❑ ❑ Drainage/Absorption 0 ❑ Economic/Jobs ❑ Fiscal Flood Plain/Flooding Forest Land/Fire Hazard Geologic/Seismic Minerals Noise Population/Housing Balance Public Services/Facilities ❑ Recreation/Parks ❑ Schools/Universities ❑ Septic Systems ❑ Sewer Capacity ❑ Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading ❑ Solid Waste ❑ Toxic/Hazardous ❑ Traffic/Circulation ❑ Vegetation ❑ Water Quality ❑ Water Supply/Groundwater ❑ Wetland/Riparian ❑ Wildlife ❑ Growth Inducing ❑ Land Use ❑ Cumulative Effects ❑ Other Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation: Combined Zoning/General Plan Designation: RS-3- PUD Project Description: (please use a separate page if necessary) A proposed subdivision end development of 21 single-family residential los poi sizes ranging from 2,800 to 4,600 square -feet in size) located on two adjacent vacant parcels of land at the southerly (errninus of Rachael Avenue. The project site is located within an existing devebped single-family neighborhood and comprises approximately 6 acres. The project site contains moderate to steeply sloping topography. There are two canyon features on -site. The primary canyon trends in a northwest -southeast direction and is located near the center of the property. The canyon bottom is located at the southeastern border of the project site. A smaller finger canyon extends from the primary canyon 10 the northeast within the central portion of the site. Disturbed non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub habitat occur an the project site. Approximately 0.75 acres of impacted non-native grasslands and 1.75 acres of impacted coastal sage scrub will be mitigated in an off -site approved mitigation bank. Approximately 3.5 acres of the overall site, which includes the primary canyon feature and quality coastal sage scrub habitat, will be retained as open space. Note: The State Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. Ifa SCiT number already exists for a project (e.g. Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill in. Revised 2004 Reviewing Agencies Checklist Appendix C, continued Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and "X". If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an "S". Air Resources Board Boating & Waterways, Department of California Highway Patrol Caltrans District # Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Caltrans Planning (Headquarters) Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy Coastal Commission Colorado River Board Conservation, Department of Corrections, Department of Delta Protection Commission Education, Department of Energy Commission x Fish & Game Region # 5 Food & Agriculture, Department of Forestry & Fire Protection General Services, Department of Health Services, Department of Housing & Community Development Integrated Waste Management Board Native American Heritage Commission Office of Emergency Services Office of Historic Preservation Office of Public School Construction Parks & Recreation Pesticide Regulation, Department of Public Utilities Commission Reclamation Board Regional WQCB # x Resources Agency S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Commission San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers and Mtns Conservancy San Joaquin River Conservancy Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy State Lands Commission SWRCB: Clean Water Grants SWRCB: Water Quality SWRCB: Water Rights Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Toxic Substances Control, Department of Water Resources, Department of x Other City of San Diego Other Local Public Review Period (to be filled in by lead agency) Starting Date February 28, 2005 Ending Date March 28, 2005 Lead Agency (Complete if applicable): Consulting Firm: N/A Address: City/State/Zip: Contact: Phone: Applicant: Pacific Scene Homes Address: 2505 Congress St. Suite 220 City/State/Zip: San Diego, CA 92110 Phone: 619-299-5112 Signature of Lead Agency Representative: Date: oZfaY/U.i� 026 City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Description: Canyon Views Subdivision and Development of 21-single family residential parcels (IS 2004-09) Applicant: Pacific Scene Homes — Allen Eads 2505 Congress Street Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92110 Address of Project: Two adjacent vacant properties located southwest of the southerly terminus of Rachael Avenue within the Rs-3-PUD Combined General Plan/Zoning Designation within the City of National City. Project Discussion A proposed subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels (parcel sizes ranging from 2,800 to 4,600 square -feet in size) located on two adjacent vacant parcels of land located southwest of the southerly terminus of Rachael Avenue. The project site is approximately 6 acres in size and located within an existing developed single-family neighborhood. The project site contains moderate to steeply sloping topography. There are two canyon features on -site. The primary canyon trends in a northwest -southeast direction and is located near the center of the property. The canyon bottom is located at the southeastern border of the project site. A smaller finger canyon extends from the primary canyon to the northeast within the central portion of the site. Disturbed non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub habitat occur on the project site. Approximately 3.5 acres of the overall site, which includes the primary canyon feature and quality coastal sage scrub habitat, will be protected and retained as open space Environmental Findings: That the Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-2004-09) has been considered together with any comments received during the public review process, and that based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any comments received) there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. A copy of the Initial Study documenting reasons to support the finding is attached (IS-2004-09) 4 Recycled Paper Mitigation Measures: 1. Focused survey(s), performed by a qualified Biologist, shall be conducted prior to the commencement of construction to determine if the species, Coastal California Gnatcatcher, occurs on the project site. If the presence of such species is found to occur on -site, the recommendations of the Biologist shall be incorporated into the project. 2. If construction is to occur between January 14 — September 30th, a survey of nesting birds, prepared by a certified Biologist, shall be completed prior to the commencement of construction to determine if there are bird nesting sites on the project site or within the vicinity. If bird nesting sites have been determined by a certified Biologist, construction can commence following the recommendations of the Biologist, including, but not limited to, the protection of such nesting sites a minimum distance of 300-feet. 3. The 0.75 acres of impacted non-native grasslands on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1:1. 4. The 1.75 acres of impacted coastal sage scrub on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.5:1. 5. The artificial fill, residual soil, and alluvial deposits shall be removed from the site and replaced as structural fill. 6. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the National City Planning Department prior to the recordation of the Final Map. 1. PROJECT TITLE/PROJECT #: 2. LEAD AGENCY: Contact: Phone: 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 4.. PROJECT PROPONENT: Contact: Phone: 5. COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNATION: Canyon Viewss Subdivision and Development of 21 Single - Family Residential Parcels (IS 2004-09) City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Mary Jo Wilson, AICP, Principal Planner (619) 336-4310 Two adjacent vacant properties located southwest of the southerly terminus of Rachael Avenue within the City of National City. Pacific Scene Homes 2505 Congress Street Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92110 Allen Eads (619) 299-5112 RS-3-PUD (Single -Family) 6. ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS: Tract Map (S 2004-12) Planned Unit Development (PUD 2004-01) 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A proposed subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels (parcel sizes ranging from 2,800 to 4,600 square -feet in size) located on two adjacent vacant parcels southwest of the southerly terminus of Rachael Avenue. The project site is approximately 6 acres in size and located within an existing developed single-family neighborhood. The project site contains moderate to steeply sloping topography. There are two canyon features on -site. The primary canyon trends in a northwest -southeast direction and is located near the center of the property. The canyon bottom is located at the southeastern border of the project site. A smaller finger canyon extends from the primary canyon to the northeast within the central portion of the site. Disturbed non-native grassland and coastal sage scrub habitat occur on the project site. Approximately 3.5 acres of the overall site, which includes the primary canyon feature and quality coastal sage scrub habitat, will be protected and retained as open space. Initial Study - Page 2 of 21 8. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) United State Department of Fish and Wildlife (USDFG) United States Army Corp. of Engineers (USACE) ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or is "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use & Planning ❑ Population & Housing X Geological Problems ❑ Water ❑ Air Quality ❑ Transportation/Circulation X Biological Resources ❑ Energy & Mineral Resources ❑ Hazards ❑ Noise X Mandatory Findings of Significance ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities & Service Systems ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Recreation DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this Initial Evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or is "potentially significant unl mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only t effect that remains to be addressed. , .C� QS X Dr(te Printed Name: Mary Jo Wilson, AICP Title: Principal Planner Initial Study - Page 3 of 21 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off -site as well as on - site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence than an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less than Significant w/ Mitigation Incorporated" applied where the incorporation of a mitigation measure has reduced an effect feozn "Potentially Significant Impact" to "Less then Significant Impact". The lead agency must df.srribe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 1 5063(c) (3) (D). 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This in only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whichever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. Initial Study - Page 4 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Sources: 1, 6) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. There are no scenic vistas that will be impacted by this project, therefore, no impact. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially damage scenic resources. There are no such resources that would be impacted by the project, therefore, no impact. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the ❑ ❑ ❑ X site and its surroundings? (Sources: 1, 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. The site is located in an urbanized area surrounded by single-family development similar to the project. Additional, trash and debris currently exist on -site which will be removed as a part of the project, therefore, no impact. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime Viewss in the areal (Sources: 1,3,6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime Viewss. The light generated by single-family homes would be insignificant, there would be a less than significant impact. X II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES -- In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation & Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non -agricultural use? (Sources:1,2) ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not convert prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of Statewide Importance. The project site is not mapped, nor planned to be mapped as farmland, therefore no impact. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Sources: 1, 2) ❑ ❑ ❑ gdo Initial Study - Page 5 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation. Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not conflict with any existing zoning for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. The property is zoned for residential development and does not have a Williamson Act contract associated with the land, therefore, no impact. c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? (Sources: 1, 2) Discussion:. The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not involve changes to the existing environment which could result in the conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural uses. The project site is located in an urbanized area and does not contain farmland, therefore no impact. III: AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air Elquality plan? (Sources: 10) ❑ ❑ x Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of any applicable air quality plan. According to the San Diego Air Pollution District (SDAPD) standards, the development of single-family residences within an urbanized would have a less than significant ▪ impact. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Sources: 10) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. According to the San Diego Air Pollution District (SDAPD) standards, the development of single-family residences within an urbanized area would have a less than significant impact. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Sources: 10) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not result in a cumulative considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the San Diego region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. According to the San Diego Air Pollution District (SDAPD), the development of single-family residences within an urbanized area would have a less than significant impact. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Sources: 10) ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. There are no known sensitive receptors in the area that would be impacted by the project, therefore no impact. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Sources: 10) C Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people There is no objectionable odor that would be the result of the project, therefore, no impact. o7 7 Initial Study - Page 6 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDBG) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: I, 6, 7) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would have a direct substantial adverse effect on certain sensitive species as determined by the CDBG or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Based on the Biological Study, dated January 18, 2005, prepared by Mooney Jones & Stokes, there is the potential for two sensitive species to occur on -site: Coastal California gnatcatcher and the Coastal Cactus Wren. The California Gnatcatcher is federally listed as threatened and is also a CDFG species of special concern. The site contains approximately 3.37 acres of disturbed coastal sage scrub which is the primary habitat for the California Gnatcatcher. In addition, to the habitat on - site, there is an additional 14 acres of habitat that occurs within the adjacent canyon. The existing habitat (coastal sage scrub) on -site is heavily disturbed. Regardless, there remains a potential for the California Gnatcatcher to occur within or adjacent to the project site. Since there is the potential for the California Gnatcatcher to occur on -site, further focused survey(s) shall be conducted to determine its presence. Proposed Mitigation Measure: Focused survey(s), performed by a qualified Biologist, shall be conducted prior to the commencement of construction to determine if the species, coastal California Gnatcatcher, occurs on the project site. If the presence of such species is found to occur on -site, the recommendations of the Biologist shall be incorporated into the project. It has been determined, based on the above references Biological study, which a second sensitive species, Coastal Cactus Wren could occur on -site. The site contains limited Coastal Cholla habitat which is inhabitated by the Cactus Wren. While there is a limited amount of this type of habitat on -site, the species has been known to occur within two miles of the project site. The small amount of Coastal Cholla habitat and the lack of the required dense thickets ne cPtaary for nesting, suggests that it is unlikely that this species occurs on -site. Since there is a potential for the Cactus Wren to occur on -site, a survey to determine if the species occurs on -site shall be conducted during the breeding season. Proposed Mitigation Measure: If construction is to occur between January 1a — September 30th, a survey of nesting birds, prepared by a certified Biologist, shall be completed prior to the commencement of construction to determine if there are bird nesting sites on the project site or within the vicinity. If bird nesting sites have been determined by a certified Biologist, construction can commence following the recommendations of the Biologist, including, but not limited to, the pr otection of such nesting sites a minimum distance of 300-feet. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation The project would have a less than significant impact with the above cited proposed mitigation measures as a part of the project. b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other ❑ X ] ❑ sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 1, 6, 7) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would have a substantial adverse effect on a sensitive natural community as defined by the CDFG or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Based on the Biological Study, dated January 18, 2005, prepared by Mooney -Jones & Stokes, the site contains both Non - Native Grasslands and Coastal Sage Scrub and one occurrence of the San Diego Sunflower. The one occurrence of the San Diego Sunflower is located within the disturbed coastal sage scrub on -site. This plant is a California Native Plant Society (CNPS) list 4 species. Due to the degraded habitat, the likelihood of additional plants occurring on -site is very low, and, therefore, no mitigation is necessary. The site contains 1.57 acres of disturbed Non -Native Grassland habitat. This habitat is present at the bottom of the canyon in the western portion of the site. The project would impact 0.75 acres of non-native grassland. After consultation with CDFG, it has been determined that the habitat is small in size, isolated from other preserved habitat, surrounded by development and not protected by a wide enough buffer between the habitat and the development. Because of these factors, CDFG has recommended that the 0.75 acres of Non -Native Grassland that would be impacted be mitigated through Initial Study - Page 7 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation the purchase of habitat off -site with an approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1:1. Proposed Mitigation Measure: The 0.75 acres of impacted Non -Native Grasslands on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1:I. The site also contains 3.37 acres of disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub, mainly located in the middle of the site and the southwestern portion of the property (primary canyon). Coastal Sage Scrub habitat is considered to be a sensitive habitat in southern California because of rapid urbanization. In addition it provides a habitat for several sensitive species, including the California Gnatcatcher, Coastal Wren, San Diego Horned Lizard and Orange -Throated Whiptail. The project would impact 1.75 acres of the disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub. After consultation with CDFG, it has been determined that the habitat is small in size, isolated from other preserved habitat, surrounded by development and not protected by a wide enough buffer between the habitat and the development. Because of these factors, CDFG has recommended that the 1.75 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub that would be impacted be mitigated through the purchase of habitat off -site with an approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.5:1. Proposed Mitigation Measure: The 1.75 acres of impacted Coastal Sage Scrub on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.5:1. It should be noted that the 3 acre on -site to be retained as open space, contains Coastal Sage Scrub and Non -Native Grassland habitat. Since CDFG considers portions of the area as isolated habitat and impact neutral, there is no mitigation neorcary. The project would have a less than significant impact with the above cited proposed mitigation measures as a part of the project c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Sources: 1, 6,7) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands. There are no wetland located on the project site, therefore no impact. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Sources: 1, 2) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ x x Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites. The project site is located within an urbanized area, surrounded by development, therefore, no impact. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Sources: 1,2) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources. The project would not impact local policies or ordinance protecting specific biological resources, therefore no impact. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Sources: 1) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Plan. There is no adopted Habitat Plan that would impact the project, therefore no impact. ❑ C ❑ x x Initial Study - Page 8 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact incorporation a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a ❑ ❑ X ❑ historical resource as defined in Section15064.5? (Sources:1, 8) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not cause adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. According to Section 15064.5, there are no significant historical resources on the project site. In addition, a Cultural Resources Constraints Analysis, dated July 2004, was prepared for the project site. The conclusion of the report is that there is a relatively low probability of detectible pre- historic resource; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? (Sources: 1, 8) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not cause adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource. According to Section 15064.5, there are no significant historical resources on the project site. In addition, a Cultural Resources Constraints Analysis, dated July 2004, was prepared for the project site. The conclusion of the report is that there is a relatively low probability of detectible pre- historic resource; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Sources: I, 8) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature. There are no known features of this type on the project site or within the area, therefore no impact. O 0 X 0 d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of ❑ ❑ ❑ X formal cemeteries? (Sources: 1, 8) ❑ CI X ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not disturb any human remain cause adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. A Cultural Resources Constraints Analysis, dated July 2004, was prepared for the project site. The conclusion of the report is that there is a relatively low probability of disturbing any human remains, therefore, there is a less than significant impact. • VI. GEOLOGY & SOILS Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death •involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Sources: I, 9) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving a rupture of a known earthquake fault. It should be recognized that Southern California is an area that is subject to some degree of seismic risk and that it is generally not considered economically feasible nor technologically practical to build structures that are totally resistant to earthquake - related hazards. Construction in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Uniform Building Code should minimize damage due to seismic events. The nearest active fault zone is the Rose Canyon Fault Zone, which is located approximately 7.4 kilometers to the west of the project site. Due to the number and nature of active and non -active fault ❑ ❑ 3r� Initial Study - Page 9 of 21 Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Incorporation lines within the southern California region, it can not be know when earthquakes will occur, therefore there is a less than significant impact. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Sources: 1,9) ❑ ❑ X ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects of strong seismic ground shaking It should be recognized that Southern California is an area that is subject to some degree of seismic risk and that it is generally not considered economically feasible nor technologically practical to build structures that are totally resistant to earthquake -related hazards. Construction in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Uniform Building Code should minimize damage due to seismic events. The nearest active fault zone is the Rose Canyon Fault Zone, which is located approximately 7.4 kilometers to the west of the project site. Due to the number and nature of active and non -active fault lines within the southern California region, it can not be know when earthquakie will occur, therefore there is a Iess than significant impact. iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? ❑ ❑ ❑ X (Sources: 1,9) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose people or structures to potentially substantial adverse effects of seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction. The earth material on the project site are not anticipated to be subject to liquefaction due to such factors as soil density, grain - size distillation, and depth to ground water, therefore no impact. iv) Landslides? (Sources: 1,9) ❑ ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose people or structures to potentially substantial adverse effects of landslides. The project site is located in Relative Landslide Susceptibility Area 3-1. Sites located within this classification are located outside the boundaries of known landslides but may contain observably unstable slopes that maybe underlain by weak materials and/or adverse geologic structure. Due to the competent nature of the underlaying Quatenary-age terrace deposits and the lack of any significant slopes, the potential for deep-seated landsliding is considered to be very low; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Sources:1,9) ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. The project site is underlain by discontinuous layers of artificial fill, residual soil and alluvial deposits overlying Quternary-age terrace deposits. The existing earth material that will be excavated is not considered to be high quality soil and the excavation will not create substantial soil erosion, therefore no impact c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? (Sources: 1,9) ❑ X ❑ ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or would become unstable as a result of the project and potentially result in an on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The project site is underlain by Quaternary -age terrace deposits which is a competent material. The discontinuous layers of artificial fill, residual soil and alluvial deposits are considered to be unsuitable in their present state to support fill and or settlement -sensitive improvements and will be removed and replaced with structural fill. Proposed Mitigation Measure: The artificial fill, residual soil, and alluvial deposits shall be removed from the site and replaced as structural fill. The project would have a less than significant impact with the above cited proposed mitigation measure as a part of the project. 3/ Initial Study - Page 10 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Sources: 1,9) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not be located on expansive soil. The project site does not include expansive soil, therefore no impact. Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Sources: 1, 9) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would have traditional sewer laterals which will connect with the existing sewer system which serves the City. There would be no need for the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems, therefore no impact. x VII. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? (Sources: 1, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials. There are no hazardous materials associated with the project, therefore no impact. ❑ ❑ ❑ x ❑ c ❑ x b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment ❑ ❑ ❑ x through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Sources: 1, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment. There are no hazardous materials associated with the project, therefore no impact. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sources: 1, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school There are no schools located within V4 mile of the project site, therefore, no impact. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Sources: 1, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites, therefore no impact. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for ❑ ❑ ❑ x x Initial Study - Page 11 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport, therefore no impact. 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single -family residential parcels is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip, therefore no impact. Potentially Less Than Less Than No • Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Sources: 1,6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The project is located within an urbanized area at the terminus of a residential street, therefore no impact. ❑ ❑ ❑ x h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Sources: 1, 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ a x Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. The project site is located within .� an existing urbanized area, therefore no impact. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge ❑ requirements? (Sources: I, 2, 6) ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirement. The project includes design features that adequately address water quality discharge requirements, therefore no impact. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level. The project will not disturb the groundwater supply, therefore no impact. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation. on- or off -site? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site. The project site has two natural drainage courses. The larger of 33 Initial Study - Page 12 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation the two is located in the southern portion (running east -west) and will retain on -site. The second, smaller natural drainage course which is located in the northeastern portion of the property will be removed as a part of the project. According to the Biological Study and consultatioin with the CDFG, the project may be subject to a Streambed Alternation Permit. The requirement of that permit does not create an adverse effect to the natural drainage pattern of the project site. The project includes appropriate drainage facilities to ensure adequate drainage which will not create substantial erosion of siltation, therefore there would be a less than significant impact. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site. The project site has two natural drainage courses. The larger of the two is located in the southern portion (running east -west) and will retained on -site. The second, smaller natural drainage course which is located in the northeastern portion of the property will be removed as a part of the project. According to the Biological Study and consultation with the •CDFG, the project may be subject to a Streambed Alternation Permit. The requirement of that permit does not create an adverse effect to the natural drainage pattern of the project site. The project includes appropriate drainage facilities to ensure adequate drainage which will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff which would create flooding; therefore there would be a less than significant impact. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. The project, as designed, would not exceed planned stormwater capacity, therefore no impact. 0 Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Sources: I, 2, 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ X ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ X X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially degrade water quality. The project is located in an urbanized developed area, includes appropriate construction and permanent best management practices that would not impact water quality, therefore no impact. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Sources: 1, 2, 6, 9) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels is not located within a mapped 100-year flood hazard area, therefore no impact. h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Sources: 1, 2, 6, 9) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels is not Located within a mapped 100-year flood hazard area, therefore no impact. 0 0 ❑ X i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Sources: 1, 2, 6, 9) X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including failure of a Levee or dam. The project site is located in an urbanized area and designed with adequate drainage improvements to prevent flooding. The project site is not within a failure are of a levee or dam, therefore no impact. Initial Study - Page 13 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? (Sources: 1, 2, 6, 9) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ C X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not be inundated by seiche, tsunami or mudflow. The project site is not in close proximity to water features that would create these natural disasters and effect the project site, therefore no impact. IX. LAND USE & PLANNING Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not physically divide an established community. The project site is surrounded by existing single-family development, therefore no impact. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) ❑ ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not conflict with any applicable land use plans, policies or regulations. The Combined General Ptan/Zoning Designation is RS-3- Planned Unit Development which allows for the development of single-family residences, therefore no impact. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural ❑ ❑ ❑ X community conservation plan? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan. The project site is not associated with any conservation plans, therefore no impact. X. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Sources: 1, 8, 9) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state of California. There are no known mineral resources on the project site, therefore no impact. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Sources: 1, 8, 9) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource. There is no known locally -important mineral resource on the project site, therefore no impact. ❑ ❑ ❑ X C X Initial Study - Page 14 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources XI. NOISE Would the project result in: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of ❑ ❑ ❑ X standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Sources: 1, 2) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of locally established standards. The noise generated from the construction phase of the project will be conducted in accordance with the City's noise ordinance, therefore no impact. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Sources: 1, 2) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not expose persons to or generate excessive groundbourne vibration or noise levels. The noise generated from the construction phase of the project will be conducted in accordance with the City's noise ordinance, therefore no impact c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project t vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Sources: 1,2Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not create a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. The project site is located in an urbanized area; therefore there is a less than significant impact. ❑ ❑ ❑ X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Sources: 1, 2) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residences would not create a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The project site is located in an urbanized area; therefore there is a less than significant impact. ❑ ❑ ❑ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such ❑ a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources:1, 2 ) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcelsis not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport, therefore no impact. X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1, 2) • Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, therefore no impact. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ X Initial Study - Page 15 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources XII. POPULATION & HOUSING Would the project: Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for ❑ El El example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Sources: 1, 2) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not induce substantial population growth in the area. The Combined General Plan/Zoning Designation for the project site allows for single-family development and the development of 21 single-family residences achieves a General Plan goal to increase housing opportunities in the community, therefore no impact. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the ❑ construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1, 2) X Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not displace a substantial number of existing housing. The project site is vacant, therefore, no impact. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the ❑ construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1, 2) X Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. The project site is vacant, therefore, no impact. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (Sources: 1, 2) ❑ ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21single-family residential parcels would not substantially adverse fire. protection services. The project site is currently and will continue to be served by the National City Fire Department. The typically response time for this neighborhood would not be impacted by this project, therefore no impact. Police protection? (Sources: 1, 2) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially adverse police protection services. The project site is currently and will continue to be served by the National City Police Department. The typical response time for this neighborhood would not be impacted by this project, therefore no impact. Lf Initial Study - Page 16 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Schools? (Sources: 1, 2) Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Incorporation Less Than No Significant Impact Impact ❑ C ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially adverse schools. The project site is served by Lincoln Acres Elementary, Granger Jr. High and Sweetwater High Schools. The potential number of school children resulting from this project will not adversely affect the school system, therefore no impact. Parks? (Sources: 1,2) ❑ ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially adverse parks. The project site is served by National City's recreational facilities, therefore no impact. Other public facilities? (Sources: 1, 2) ❑ ❑ ❑ X Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not . substantially adverse other public facilities. The existing public facilities are adequate to support the project, therefore no impact. XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Sources: ) D ❑ ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated, therefore no impact. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Sources: ) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels does include a passive recreational area in the southern portion of the project site. This area will be retained as open space and will become a Views shed for the proposed residences. The development will not require the expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment, therefore no impact. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (Sources: 1, 2, 11) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would increase in traffic. The project will take access off the southern terminus of Rachael Avenue. Rachael residential street that is currently used for access for the existing single-family residences within neighborhood. According to the SANDAG ITE Guidelines fro Traffic Impact Studies in the San Diego Region, 2000, if there are less then 500 average daily trips, the project is considered to have a less than significant ❑ ❑ X not cause an Avenue is a the existing dated March impact. The Initial Study - Page 17 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant w/ Mitigation Incorporation Less Than No Significant Impact Impact project would generate 210 average number of daily trips (10 per dwelling unit); therefore the project would have a less than significant impact. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources: 1, 2, 11) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by SANDAG, the San Diego regions congestion management agency. The project will only create 210 daily trips which would have a less than significant effect. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Sources: 1, 2, 11) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. The project will not impact air traffic patterns; therefore no impact. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Sources: 1, 2, 1 I) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses. The design features of the project including the design of the private streets and entrance to the project are appropriate, therefore no impact. ❑ ❑ ❑ x e) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1, 2, 11) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ x x Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not result in inadequate emergency access. The entrance to the project is from the public right-of-way (Rachael Avenue). The design of the private streets that are accessed by Rachael Way have been designed in accordance with private road standards acceptable to the City of National City Fire Department for the allowance of larger emergency vehicles, therefore no impact. f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? (Sources: 1, 2, 11) ❑ ❑ ❑ x Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not result in inadequate parking capacity. Each residence is providing a two -car garage, which is required per the National City Municipal Code, therefore no impact. g) Conflict with adopted policies plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Sources: 1, 2, 11) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation, therefore no impact. XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. The project would be ❑ ❑ LY Initial Study - Page 18 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources designed to appropriately treat wastewater, therefore no impact. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation C ❑ ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The project is located in an urbanized area with existing water and wastewater facilities in the area, therefore no impact. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. The proposed on -site drainage facilities to be constructed on -site are adequate, therefore the project would have a less than significant impact. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources. The water serving agency is the Sweetwater Authority. There are adequate water supplies available for the project, therefore no impact. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) C ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ x x Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would have ar'ress to an adequate capacity to serve the project's demand. The wastewater treatment provider is National City Sewer District. There is adequate capacity for the disposal of wastewater for the project, therefore no impact. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Sources: 1, 2, 6) Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would be served by EDCO. The landfill has sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs, therefore no impact. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? ❑ ❑ ❑ x ❑ ❑ ❑ x Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would comply with federal, state and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. Initial Study - Page 19 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS of SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation 11 Discussion: The Canyon Views subdivision and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would have a direct substantial adverse effect on certain sensitive species as determined by the CA Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Based on the Biological Study, dated January 18, 2005, prepared by Mooney Jones & Stokes, there is the potential for two sensitive species to occur on -site: Coastal California gnatcatcher and the Coastal Cactus Wren. The California Gnatcatcher is federally listed as threatened and is also a CDFG species of special concern. The site contains approximately 3.37 acres of disturbed coastal sage scrub which is the primary habitat for the California Gnatcatcher. In addition, to the habitat on - site, there is an additional 14 acres of habitat that occurs within the adjacent canyon. The existing habitat (coastal sage scrub) on -site is heavily disturbed. Regardless, there remains a potential for the California Gnatcatcher to occur within or adjacent to the project site. Since there is the potential for the California Gnatcatcher to occur on -site, further focused survey(s) shall be conducted to determine its presence. Proposed Mitigation Measure: Focused survey(s), performed by a qualified Biologist, shall be conducted prior to the commencement of construction to determine if the species, coastal California Gnatcatcher, occurs on the project site. If the presence of such species is found to occur on -site, the recommendations of the Biologist shall be incorporated into the project. It has been determined, based on the above references Biological study, which a second sensitive species, Coastal Cactus Wren could occur on -site. The site contains limited Coastal Cholla habitat which is inhabitated by the Cactus Wren. While there is a limited amount of this type of habitat on -site, the species has been known to occur within two miles of the project site. The small amount of Coastal Cholla habitat and the lack of the required dense thickets necessary for nesting, suggests that it is unlikely that this species occurs on -site. Since there is a potential for the Cactus Wren to occur on -site, a survey to determine if the species occurs on -site shall be conducted during the breeding season. Proposed Mitigation Measure: If construction is to occur between January 1 a — September 30th, a survey of nesting birds, prepared by a certified Biologist, shall be completed prior to the commencement of construction to determine if there are bird nesting sites on the project site or within the vicinity. If bird nesting sites have been determined by a certified Biologist, construction can commence following the recommendations of the Biologist, including, but not limited to, the protection of such nesting sites a minimum distance of 300-feet. Based on the Biological Study, dated January 18, 2005, prepared by Mooney Jones & Stokes, the site contains both Non - Native Grasslands and Coastal Sage Scrub and one occurrence of the San Diego Sunflower. The one occurrence of the San Diego Sunflower is located within the disturbed coastal sage scrub on -site. This plant is a California Native Plant Society (CNPS) list 4 species. Due to the degraded habitat, the likelihood of additional plants occurring on -site is very low, and, therefore, no mitigation is necessary. The site contains 1.57 acres of disturbed Non -Native Grassland habitat. This habitat is present at the bottom of the canyon in the western portion of the site. The project would impact 0.75 acres of non-native grassland. After consultation with CDFG, it has been determined that the habitat is small in size, isolated from other preserved habitat, surrounded by development and not protected by a wide enough buffer between the habitat and the development. Because of these factors, CDFG has recommended that the 0.75 acres of Non -Native Grassland that would be impacted be mitigated through the purchase of habitat off -site with an approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1:1. Proposed Mitigation Measure: The 0.75 acres of impacted Non -Native Grasslands on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1:1. -/ Initial Study - Page 20 of 21 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation The site also contains 3.37 acres of disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub, mainly located in the middle of the site and the southwestern portion of the property (primary canyon). Coastal Sage Scrub habitat is considered to be a sensitive habitat in southern California because of rapid urbanization. In addition it provides a habitat for several sensitive species, including the California Gnatcatcher, Coastal Wren, San Diego Horned Lizard and Orange -Throated Whiptail. The project would impact 1.75 acres of the disturbed Coastal Sage Scrub. After consultation with CDFG, it has been determined that the habitat is small in size, isolated from other preserved habitat, surrounded by development and not protected by a wide enough buffer between the habitat and the development. Because of these factors, CDFG has recommended that the 1.75 acres of Coastal Sage Scrub that would be impacted be mitigated through the purchase of habitat off -site with an approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.5:1. Proposed Mitigation Measure: The 1.75 acres of impacted Coastal Sage Scrub on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.5:1. The project would have a less than significant impact with the above cited proposed mitigation measures as a part of the project. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when Viewsed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not have a cumulative substantial effect on the environment. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Discussion: The Canyon Views sub -division and development of 21 single-family residential parcels would not have an environmental effect which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. ❑ ❑ ❑ X REFERENCE SOURCES: Reference # Document Title Available for ReViews at: 1 National City General Plan City of National City Planning Dept. 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 2 City of National Municipal Code 3 City of National City Design Guidelines 4 National City Redevelopment Plan 5 City of National City Local Coastal Plan & Implementing Ordinances 6 Canyon Views Plan Packet 7 Canyon Views Biological Report, January 2005 8 Canyon Views Cultural Resources Study, July 2004 9 Canyon Views Geo-Technical Study, September 2004 10 San Diego Air Quality Control District 11 SANDAG Traffic ITC Manual a a u lt it u Initial Study - Page 21 of 21 MITIGATION MEASURES: The following Mitigation Measures shall be incorporated into the Canyon Viewss subdivision and development of 21 single- family residential parcels on a 6 acre site located at the southern terminus of Rachael Avenue in the RS-3- Planned Unit Development Combined General Plan/Zoning Designation. 1. Focused survey(s), performed by a qualified Biologist, shall be conducted prior to the commencement of construction to determine if the species, Castal California Gnatcather, occurs on the project site. If the presence of such species is found to occur on -site, the recommendations of the Biologist shall be incorporated into the project. 2. If construction is to occur between January 1a - September 30th, a survey of nesting birds, prepared by a certified Biologist, shall be completed prior to the commencement of construction to determine if there are bird nesting sites on the project site or within the vicinity. If bird nesting sites have been determined by a certified Biologist, construction can commence following the recommendations of the Biologist, including, but not limited to, the protection of such nesting sites a minimum distance of 300-feet. 3. The 0.75 acres of impacted Non -Native Grasslands on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1:1. 4. The 1.75 acres of impacted Coastal Sage Scrub on -site shall be mitigated in an off -site Wildlife agency approved mitigation bank at a ratio of 1.5:1. 5. The artificial fill, residual soil, and alluvial deposits shall be removed from the site and replaced as structural fill. 6. A Mitigation Monitoring Program shall be submitted and approved by the National City Planning Department prior to the recordation of the Final Map. Looking Southeast towards the City of San Diego Recreation Fields Looking Southwest towards the Natural Canyon Feature To the South of Rachael Avenue looking South Looking East toward Chatanooga Street in the City of San Diego `/5 NATIONAL CITY, .CALIFORNIA APPLICATION for Tentative Parcel Map ✓ Tentative Subdivision Map Make checks payable to the City of National City File application with the: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 (619) 336-4310 PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WHEN COMPLETING THIS FORM FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Case Number S Z —4 Filing Fee $ io ,5;; Date Received / (3, E.A.F. Required Fee $ /VA Related Cases PUL- 'UN- */, . S — Zak/-9 Cep P71.46-5: 5 - 2coc-3 /Quo- ,( --/ SEE FILING INSTRUCTIONS AND CHAPTER 17 OF' THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE FOR MORE INFORMATION. ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 5 y OS O54'0O AND c)1411-1 I aop PROPERTY LOCATION WES?C.KN TEWn1NUS OF BLueg_lcC,E ST. COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION RS " 3 - NV o Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Map Application Revised December, 1998 Page 1 of 3 CIVIL ENGINEER OR OTHER AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Name: ose- Name: Signature Signature (Signatur wledges that this (Signature acknowledges that this app on is being filed) application is being filed) Address: iliALK c TT t WON 6 Address: ?",+h?�� F c j TH SAN1 ble6o, C A gz-03 Phone No. (p 1 - P ` 9 -559d Phone No. Fax No. (p Iq - q - i Q 3q Fax No. Date: Vi4 O Date: PROPERTY OWNER(S) of all property included in this application: (Attached extra sheets if necessary). Name: Name: Signature Signature (Signature acknowledges that this (Signature acknowledges that this application is being filed) application is being filed) Address: Address: Phone No. Phone No. Fax No. Fax No. Date: Date: Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Map Application Revised December, 1998 Page 2 of 3 97 APPLICANT Name: _AL A N E.41iv , 1 j.¢ n EQ01 (Please type or print) Signature: cas2s&,__ (Signature certifies that the information submitted with this application is true and accurate•to the best of the applicant's knowledge). Address: PAC-1 1G Sc. JE.. Ir kMEs 2SO CO)J 261.1 57: ,Sutt>< 220 J41.1 new.) gyp) CA cJ 2l1 O Phone No. C(o N) 2cI -S'l 12 Fax No. �io (e9 Pict --18 (v Date: 9/8/ Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Map Application Revised December, 1998 Page 3 of 3 r•, NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA. APPLICATION for Conditional Use•Permit' Planned Development Permit ✓ Planned Unit Development Permit Make checks payable to the City of National City File application with the: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 (619) 336-4310 PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WHEN COMPLETING TfIIS FORM FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Case Number Pbo — 200411 Filing Fee $ . 5cu eeel�/ tKN Date Received ' Ay By E.A.F. Required VG'S Fee $ N0 Related Cases 5-1 vv-afrs-2a,s/-9 4.0 6LFs: S-Avi 3l>u0•-liav/-/ LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Attach if insufficient space) "fAE Flpraxicw of T)241rr 600 ots LINCOLn1 AC42..E3 ANA/E.x No. 3, M4-,' i S4 ,9 jo PA1CFL Z of PArtctt. MAP AIo. P+ (0) Au. w rife. city dF otnev4AL City, Coltelry of .SAN Diefro„ svir1~ OF G41.IFbi2,4(A PROPERTY LOCATION Scx1TRE,LLY "TERM kW OF RA cHAEL srsear No. Street between QLU E./2I OCrE S7: and L. yn! A sl E T COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION RS -3 ^ PUD Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 1 of 4 REQUEST: The Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit (Chapter 18.116), Plannei Development Permit (Chapter 18.126), or Planned Unit Development Permit (Chapter 18.30) to use the above described property for the following purposes: TRH.s Is A (12E4t)EST fvt. f1 24 - t3M'i . VNir CydeLopmeArr ipN AcitES. T . (fit/ At.L. °AF,u sl ty is 3.6' D w cueu.. UN irs/ AcnL me. 140411es Lai gr.- t3utt, ' on Jitlee.t. LOTS RANgtA4- IN tst E E. Hum 28p0 Tb 4000 ..Mutyrt f er. Tim r' eo i& r nLas' 25f.g.0 DE.sv6MW lb u4F .L tram AN C 01/471..I✓-FA.niti AJEitai dttlot;y.. APPaaxe L.y 3.s .Armes Alf TO& .sire. wiLt. rat- 1421.3E4Ekst As OpEN.. PROPERTY OWNER(S) of all property included in this application: (Attached extra sheets if necessary). Name: Name: Signature Signature (Signature acknowledges that this (Signature acknowledges that this application is being filed) application is being filed) Address: Address:... Phone No. Phone No. Fax -No. Fax No. Date: .. Date: Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 2 of 4 APPLICANT Name: ,-&LAnl £4OS ctd (Please type ora�print) Signature: Q�l![aC—_ c - — (Signature certifies that the information submitted with this application is true and accurate to the best of the applicant's knowledge). Address: PACMC, 5C,I jE.- 14010EZ 2S5os" cub .Z sr: Sut au, nrc, G4 921l o Phone No. OD IR) 2q9 -S-112 Fax No. 60 Date: 9/A/ o1 Tentative Parcel/Subdivision Map Application Revised December, 1998 Page 3 of 3 r:• 220 Canyon View Proposed Keystone Retaining Wall System with enter Cells Plan Check # January 2005 Prepared by Susie Andreotti, Project Manager Pacific Scene Homes Canyon View Proposed CMU Sp11t-Face Wall Plan Check # Split faced units have a natural stone -like texture produced by molding two unfits face-to-face, then mechanically splitting them apart after curing, creating a fractured surface. Because coarse aggregate is also fractured and exposed in this process, aggregate selection can alter the final appearance. Split -faced units can also be manufactured with ribs or scores to provide strong vertical lines in the finished wall. Rough textures, like those available with split face units, are often used in areas prone to graffiti, as the texture tends to discourage graffiti vandals. Split face units are governed by ASTM C 90, which includes an allowance to account for the rough face. ASTM C 90 prescribes minimum faceshell thickness requirements for all load -bearing concrete masonry units, but also contains a variance for split face units where up to 10% of a split faceshell can be less than the minimum specified thickness, but not less than 3/4 in. (19 mm). This 10% limit does not apply, however, when the units are solidly grouted. January 2005 Prepared by Susie Andreotti, Project- Manager Pacific Scene Homes 3 r 5133111"flillik CANYON VIEW TENTA TI VE MAP/GRADING PLAN .�: 1`�_2111"�.� JJJO I 1- IC. .. ‘41i#11/1 11=4f4Cp;i--.]ii'l''..1"-.1. in7-5"1114:"*": * fir �t j 1 ■ Mat �ry�i���'la� ��w ' �ifr 4_6' , -,.,�• A\\r_�iy� yam' !ry-�,Y,rnf/, \yi .V�-firs � 11111111111111111 Hi� 1 ■ 1 1 y 1 1 tl W. a 1 1 1 1 1 burkeff k wong engineers k surveyors; 3434 fourth ave., son diego, ca. 92103-4941; phone (619) 299-5550, fax (619) 299-9934 PLAN 1 S-2004- 1 2/PUD-2004- 1 CANYON VIEW v _ (.9 J ���w lli� lI ID — rs�nq ��ear ail��o�ar� �aa Pi 1 • - .A.,,, , ,. '' ' 44 Awl • • _ I: . ‘• .,'"--i.,•-- „.-: ''-,•!, , o -',,,(4' •,',4. '''', ' ;AX,;•' • fireplace Q NOOK idwi 00 KITCHEN island FAMILY ROOM 2-CAR GARAGE FIRST FLOOR DINING ROOM i LIVING ROOM ENTRY PORCH V ♦ V MASTER BATH walk-in closet 10 2 BATH B TH 2 linen wardrobe BEDROOM 3 PARADISE RIDGE PLAN 1 linen MASTER BEDROOM 0 BEDROOM 2 down pot shelf open to below wardrobe BEDROOM 4 SECOND FLOOR 4AQ AAA, AAA ROTAS SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PLAN T SQUARE NIT ITS 44 1p41 V, FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PLAN 1 •P274 EA, Mil SCAM MI. . 11O' PLAN DATA CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTION. DETAILS 1,y]RM&CY CONSTRUCTION Y+ H9p1E 042 Sa I W3 TORN °1N°WG UNITS W.1TA STSTEA° It(p0E O4Th 01,34•1101EV ywl [E 42411020 z rwn.Tacw r.n20040004N179 PUE+u.Nnvn<la. AxVAVA L,m ro Ee i TVA u •rr. 4O11441-.m w=% STHCNOS AAA.. MY MINI WMOMO eCOE. w. i.a%S. a. 514.4a 140,2 To ,441214. .TN AR.M, •a, . qTA NIAM NO ...VW caw MC. n.q. bK 7.4 CR r.4mW4o 4}NnT. 41441i M: e4,4141MT24 x+nY rrw. 12,421444 xa 4a ecru col.f+Ai o. .24444 NIL21.0 w.r! 21,41/26 842141322411Fm2414 KAP 'MINTS maVc ocanc% o. NeV18 MM OOI•MIMI Ma?ROW;.•41,4 ELOP ArwA® iT NAVE Ye +lr pa WV. A.nA++Sx.aimTPweMilias vnim� w ARef A r .141.1.0.5.1. X comAunocO 2 W14491 Q1M FAA m0 T1PGLL mlyp. 242012 1/5 D4441R 1iF1;/L Stlaa OM,'6N4LLm cc1.mGT0am P@a[® 24,44. ,451142Ti112et24 , 'FNu_ J A 222144 nm1G}/4•44244. r.4L PAL 141,m•w mow. RODRIGUEZ + SIMON I•I DESIGN ASSOC. INC . A.M. H Sew-T U T oSrm ° PUN SHEET NOTES 2 MAWR AAA• 024 WPM R.O[ TO SR.b.\ • roa oao. No AAA somas. Mr>m -o As. AL PUN SHEET LEGENDS i SEEZZa Rw eo c Ai1M.}21241. .WA2G. INTERIOR FINISH LEGEND Olt WTI AT BI-0. VC. LWOW, IOW CLEM A'RFN V 4,1®cove. or, (`I NmaN.aw GAM 14.44 ru% Jtalus .M'mM. { Tau. xsur T G2*0TW2 . 2200 ✓ ASA. isSPECS. \GTGOOVIOSI11011 mas e, rem 14. ✓ VluLlm C(VNS rl • Ass nc 144.412 aEGR PLAN KEY NOTES [µ VAMP ..Arms w G.Mivwr, 2041,2421 .Sa yYE Ma. a..4..440•u•aPANT ePm• .la%nwe NT.�Y • 114 W gBµ. E 1p.iMAIVCImIR M0I. RNTE 50010411E4AII2.224.G224AM•Np1M.a0do1 ,*20.. 3 1®I(I.E GBCT. . 30, .•mem 0006 RrYwlu1Gx'SB•}GU IV NANCX 1014A19 NL n0400,. • 00TdN E2eN. *A W ept tt01Tx 1•N9� ! M9.CGY•In.fO'IlnlAll. NOn`FKl Mo 1Ml »'CIR Skr[ TGR. ▪ iC{llu}0141; M ,110.1 11. • STYY04Ra ✓ IOW.*VI MTRALiWRIT W. ./i ]WLLAARmA-!YOr31PAVM. seAu C1. a}a • 42.441222 2014221,9 mA. Wes «ea®nnveKr. A Rres wxw.vca } AA,A , .lYAne PLe rt.va l.ueiyg Wtcµ. eat. 1.1 J,Y SY 44/CG Wl44111,224. SE2 10A9q GX6R 41GVP u.K CPawast RMLPYRR I15 NO AAA ... P orr, 40,47 GRY..'YR, 412411422I Lb. isaiae. ▪ SW2,4 f1P. m.IW!!• W4cuR*0L ME FA I\ MSt*011.1 fAN.MI LW.. WNW 0 N0va441 N0.11 *r S.r1dlEM.l 0.4 Air I➢1 EMIM ... IW tl.bfR •YV.O AARAARyeas,. s AAA, 8. .. 20 mw,rwnww1s45Ot 4,42,1312,1444 a AT 1.IIRA SDE MEWS V. PREwLkV F. MOIL M(RpRovrrO.... cP. • .nrealuo A mamas RwR11 P.. 1v MT.W 10,4 M.CAEf*R Ay AA A AAA, 20F'Tr m.bMGC61!K • 1D4�2R :RNE 21. MY\16 WR,201. .4:fAY1M M1P JtML.4Vl. PARADISE RIDGE HOMES • FIPACIFIC SCENE HOMES >#5 ( eW l STASI- Rao DIM Go V IIp AIRSAaM HI YM TAWS IA PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLAN 02,1,115 1 "" t4Y s. r. I I-N i.. I SHEET A1.1 K. 6° varvr v�ra��aWTM • bnc DVD �}Wn Fue uu.'6i LUKWxeMarvvmswwnawaaPx.W hk:W�rY4i rvWYPY ru>, ur+xxa+en nnai we y3rgy qyM yY}ly.wxnirvvNEn as mupnrcywpxrfnp9'aYVWFNMp WxP • 3 100 I. PI p5 an'au vti rvrvxx�oYe vim. tr�x�voVj OrTJ�W M nryirixwa�j.xrvrvarl]2 mYn Asxtrss b[LLL Mo m z 611,4 t9 gig in.Pui smeherm om ammo n nn....w.mu r .d wa wun "'.�:':h....".mtim,.�. :•u0•.,w«ewe:Ab...T. n+wahhh :° '"w "."`�."..r`mar. s''m"..m�m a�n..�.enr[ WG• iL LLZ•WN .COryaE + uu :i F %L. . N _.14444e4r4444 ii4e4 tARaRxRASF PLAN 1 - INTER. ELEVATIONS :E 4 NantfUX06P00m.WiNEw 4u AT rsnmm •w�WUK iLxw �n�a^.lna�=aua n�w=',0lF[omrm amu[onamaaOaW arva WYwMVM4N wn if Ali wuY+Wan9nMSS� Ym es nl.nT'a pw mb oa�Y�t�aa uaswn umr an oww wuu maw wezMx�an� cP^mvrtM 4aOi MIIN I° it/110110! r 4 gq thahlaild .NN ..:r::S 7 u i . N:.riiri •4:G .x Qi aR PLAN 1 • ROOF PLANS 1 BUILDING ATTIC VINfllM1 N CAM 1 s t s i it 1 Hill ! It h.11 �SI di j L. i1, < 6 ^ �i Si ^ WA ^� Si 95 i i II 1111a Ili �WY de° Y DaoA L;6. M J..'ONJ1 1UIDING ATTIC VB TU1ION CAC 11 if 4f 111 1ii 1111 r1 II !i ji 11i : • IN 3s • u ei 0 11�1 j : i 1- " -i" ^5 si 9s sap 000 411) E g 0 3 0 LEFT ELEVATION PUN IA Port, non T-LAL W MTon.N9 xN? 1.0912 9.111, unaMIw awl 9 b' RIGHT ELEVATION 699 PLAN 1A Nora NN 12919..ra,..a. man Gonna nas.o man 9rwoupun n FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 1A 1.9 WN-412 a Mli REAR ELEVATION PLAN 1A MOM FOR TRCµX 0990-9I NrP 0171916291TO 1909 aNAttM'RNM KALE. 1/.••1.0 J RODRIGUEZ + SIMON DESIGN ASSOC INC . nFCH1TFCTi ANH •LAN NFFS d mxrm. vn<wFN®uN,N Mn�'•«a M1M R�s.l r•r •• ELEVATION SHEET NOTES e I. R.kPaN AT ...wog a4Yb NH[AA 099 4J2 a POCK K0ai Ia...1.1406.018 WU- 4CWC YdNY.. wM 0,14Pr46 AwWag, wMCwEetRelTiaEIcYWV0Yrx- v.Ilmaw aA0191rominrwrcM• iva,.. cm.. Ma ORA. u,ow_ MCA.9m" Nawmn.wIWA. 0910 0.1,11rAu a Pon nrePC P1 0nw so woman lwS mwv Penn l o ... • 9619 ELEVATION SHEET LEGEND �. 1109.9 0299.16912299. Rxa ro Num, ELEVATION KEY NOTES O • nor. ¢ 0ni,111 I0 POLL !TRW. RR R4lKA.M4- a C956099 099199 ,N,owl TmL rArcNnxw rmAoul. 031.06912.e NTNID. GalONaNR.[Oc sNmr FooR r.ueN anwua><inNA1 raLwa Floe . 54 NA9 ns IDoa woman. NW14.T1IAL Lana 6929 1p. e. Rum, Pawns nrx NuRW I914 KVM C0400. 929 X NO2G LL.8,VNn. RM! N. 01A 099 ooew wxrnrlrl4AFA Mf ir.t.. no. num one. AnG •nunno ANCHrtrar.. Q. • N4a999.9109 1lARANONAIRb R4Ve Al GFIGT 0.99, 99139. °YO QrNrat 4K I.,I.m..R T✓.a.99999 is Acc«. rAw We! 0. ▪ %6' Wy.IETALVJN9£1791 Y3992 r 2999 e.Wp V NATGI G.9UIWyf�. .9.2094.279.a FLAW mom, An ..MD GYL temmosms 1Y/Jj,� . M IQra. Mi MR..l..mRiO sod. RIV. u. R4f4Nf0GNI./ottO4rrM. L N:97 n/GWR 9996099 CGPIW D. 01014r x v99.199'rvee wcAnw a AC HV/ Gfw pea fOWIF¢ AN. • mFFuevaLEvc..,ol. • PARADISE RIDGE HOMES .PACIDC SCENE HOMES - EE mwesarter sw orcq 999 NM 4wm. en WO tows fAX PLAN IA • EXTER. ELEVATIONS • ..c�.l Nnw; A yN.N. • W'Y43.9 how �6F A1.5 Fl r LEFT ELEVATION PLAN 18 sPowTbx wa le,.ts ROTA m sPol. ne.T..IOII AAA w ATr ws, iu RIGHT ELEVATION PLAN WPC, wo,Artos e0Tr SIO7010 raga 4GVATq.rW1xA ATPer wv. FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 18 w ...e• MT. 2P Tr.., MMWTP MC vsTA.e WPM T[I ROrt 9FVMW R.X IA` ATOM, VAS, REAR ELEVATION 101Z. MaiPUN 18 mLr.I. IIrMW.TKN/AV CCTwLM1 mv.IV PROW SLLYAII.rwl WW1 6¢r RODRIGUEZ + SIMON DESIGN ASSOC INC . ARCHITECTS H. Ians fxi e: Asa a *Ha I RmvswanA w•s,:w•sm EL▪ EVATION SHEET NOTES rat 1W IISMWI6 AT Cowb. c.s1.W ATM To. MAIL PXPlem FNMA. MALTA KIWIS Ywl. S Y O.VY1,Lei o HARD OAK Oerw.sa TIMTTw/-b rY▪ lMW 4NlMt A1� TWDWfFrtT WTI Ile ▪ IgS• NALLart luseuM.@F Moee s. I fad w.wPa. w+mr LseOTTO . 6.eox Mlu wrnro uuv avn. WITS TO sax 17 role A0+reoWPLL moor s*.u. ELEVATION SHEET LEGEND !MAI.. SYY1C Lsy WAWA sot rovnun. ELEVATION KEY NOTES �. 0,Ln0,a6.6...,,YLa WL 1611511. 6TGrK.ATLTS • 6.I.PI.,MLm Qa, Mr. WOW TAIL 6.M.CY.MYCO 11,1111t • Y,rIA= A emu. w,.0 mYlA emu rC. Aunt. Mf.a.PY.0 • 25Y CALM .LATTP. Law S▪ LOE ,ww 0.1, MIRED Pee AxYILTw., b. ERODR MIAs Au LC` S 613. Ai 7lAvAA 10. FRAM COLD. AS ...MO erf IAVITITLX PMVL RFIYO LM6 MAXA WIWXNMM1X2 Mr. AT.Y uLw. rW.E LLECA M.401.719 W AYCWI�T. ..1•2 =OtNE. .Iw.e AI. cores... TT. Golwrioll TAIL <ALM ioenr: 6uw rAw,m.v SG.ICML Mu. LRR PAl11Tm PM lwoel 46LA YAQC H• AY.ALKIRK WM9m w41.9PS TM s MrLµ Amu. vs sun, Sup, MUSH. Y. .NiR. 644T0RRYId! 0AAn21.0.P A Lrr TawLw KAMM COMET TPEIO++ Pv.IM“TIC .. HST, ma, 1•PPAMISe TT MT PLAN. •• N. N6 • •.v.LT/£f GM1li LAP. ▪ IIC arts,. NpNbR WFTa WY- LApIW •. m *Tr IST. ▪ 6STI Il AsTM. $ iN FRRUuussbTMI a ACI.nlmi1Yx00racursvw. 61L.T I1GIpl IIXATY.Y. • PARADISE RIDGE HOMES PACIHC SCENE HOMES 616 WNW. MET YN Of40 GIPS bel lolont 614 SWIM LAI PLAN 16 - EXTER. ELEVATIONS Pn a.n m.Y.> ovw; • IwI` MAY5.3701 Ipn 1Y.w SILLT A1.6 a: ni m z 0 u, •n.,.,...a im ram w• wr r•.•m• ww•••ono. •wwa: jai.:<i�.oeo.<••m.:bm:..u'••"••o.a •"�.m�MA°41v,m'"��`. :'�"�',• ;,14 w•.um•mx<wo e .1... 1. Dim UNinm a..1, .nm.,: iw a° Min in. an a. N•,aw.•.lam ..�.wn•a><..e,,r.;o ....MO .47m. ...m•.w n•o.an"* z • Ov O E2z U ow cda r 1 t MVO 111 n . M .1 N+ . tl d d Y•• ff tl d I • a PLAN 1- SECTIONS CO G9 1 .M 0.4 MPA er 7 r { a 11 z O¢ ..V6 o.° 1. Hi PA m Z 0 .0 O. PLAN 2 S-2004- 1 2/PUD-2004- 1 CANYON VIEW searridinilmaceenti lawman *ma IEWEIA I 11119E41111 ICC" • G , 92 DO w: 00 00 island KITCHEN ref. ;space DINING ROOM 2-CAR GARAGE LIVING ROOM FIRST FLOOR MASTER BEDROOM w .0 BEDROOM II 3 2 wardrobe so BEDROOM 3 PARADISE RIDGE PLAN 2. a 2 4 own Vanity a MASTER BATH walk-in closet linen OPEN TO BELOW / OPTIONAL BEDROOM 5 0 0 BATH 2 BEDROOM 4 Li I L SECOND FLOOR OPTIONAL BEDROOM 5 SPACE 14501 WOOS i db Rape TOTS SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN FLAN 2 a� SQUARE MET 1pi OP. PASS SE FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN PLAN 2 xNs SO. 11d PLAN DATA OCCUPANCY CONSIPuctux HECHT TEE SFRpY1lRS TOTS. MELLING UFNS CONSTRUCTION NOTES CONSTRUCTON DETAILS Ma Y« sV SLOT WS6 SYSTEMS REQ4.*a Nil 1. FOOWCM Y SO..55 b/ a 1MNNn avuC .u1ult .'msrsv� .1beib4eCret Roouown Ie..owas mianrar, man STNaw 122N. W5r4E VC4 CIO1.1tl. Rxw11rA. SOWWII Wags., aew Riw 51-111E11.1.I111.141SOSTY WOE YLIRa9ROl1E KO GMPM]m rO}VXM1 GSPQ FOR L10C.P111.1q 54151.v PENS. e .kwa. NO lS 45.I AE.M1.5ycap . V/l Ruec 11112.2511•50110 «nmml.z lsaw warm^a1dC 5501014 mo. fE1fl..65 lam e.5 Coe .wow l.e MIMEO m w.OTlt03T ROPER ISVOre£ r LSRep a TM dz111o9MOx Nb1Lm1•S lames nanes ..r w1w Ns TO Nov aLwdw Exs .aFG6TT W115O CNU 1/2 B A�IT6 1.95111E 424.1•41.011. OAIIV•5110011.5QLOOPEM1ISISO OE 11W 11015.10517.2.11C ROs. Cmaa acl3 mm 11rM/a NIPUR L.]L4 iMMyRO SW,/ R R.wmw.m la Apr, o VETS.. N1EWSp, CAMEO ERN K5•v.115C cp6lvr rep 16[ RIOBYPO AVAIL. WOV-N. MlaOSnN. OG'O0Nb5MM..BC fc101wl-a 1O11max_s.cla ♦Tres m11w1x IM{.GOC1OaVOLL calGmeTV PRE SAIL 63, RODRIGUEZ + SIMON DESIGN ASSOC. INC . NO ARCH.IM P OMWaal eiAN Inq lt�{iiellimiu • PLAN SHEET NOTES 1. 11an 1+elEv . 5»a:u 1 OM Many Ta an. e.. 11aRaM1f44.12 to SG, PLAN SHEET LEGENDS MLL Ma-P I', MYvb)YV. mro NL 5000 .NaW.TW NOS,. INTERIOR FINISH LEGEND rV5 TPirtff� o I1516581116 SP. OmLK wrxn wwwN aea115 e111.111 • m ex. m. TNd l PARRS kV 51E50•511 P.19F aria ew. o. dRn1EC000E rttt 5w. 15.512 Rem e1016x H 'JC:v Mb41 SCOW a-a¢P1O 1P1yY..5. 1. Mn4R1am P11ra.El lareR..mS lag!, VALVE• 51,11.1 v P/51005.t551c15c1011.E415s a1c•sw.v.111a15..a1 cues 2. 1.11.53915.�brec...e.. co. NN[VAl T2 71121.41. .IdIHZ1198bCMtW MN E11161155.160.75011f 1. R .. ...KW 25445. OWL11CY/61AfARSSU¢M!- 5.5 MASA MEP MIL OA- MON'FkC NiI NN N'[llISINE b. Ta1LC N4Ctp5S4Cl I4.I.TgL - • x.rloer ae.rt lamaao ay. a. x TO e+muTm OWE IV MCA 5fa .xe.m wear camer Lfl.gn40.15.PdldNjR 6W3. ED femea NYNM4]f4V IMFL V RNtl1Gi TO 'MI. 11dR Ip fW, 6..ass 1WUM 61a•. • C 41l IMiG K.115NVb L6 5.511.1_LaO3 O. m'Lp PLIC VOW M. PO WOWS. OR NON 50115.I5C6111, NbVRRl1155OT: IS LOC Or ao. [ACV 4 44S 4IYTT.6. YCG35rN50T s. /Ocvt. T N SO' T1Y OM ea Au.• q O. litN. 10 11 11 V. M11.1YN.1N.. VMS OF MO*OTOS WaKN LW.41•14 MYam q lNRx on./ Cobs •• tl. 33w115.15 OH`iM le...•.W. M fRM IS 1L.•M1SOVJIgy DOR NWO- - • RW OIL W LI55116 cs.5 1LSL4K I11C.LK40FL mom. mum (IGDO. P /m1;1va LO1511Y1a11Lf 15 41vc1a x Mwlcosv.ae Mrwm osoa0.a sass, nemwC a. AT USW, EndaA SW OP Vt llu:nNC Oracle. • Na4MYO ]0. PsOIYSMN WARM AM 1O1 dnAl.idDL ▪ IW IUT{SSnC d'ip' 411E Mpn511u. tp MKClK a. raw.lele otos, as. CSOStele owns.- Ja•S b MI[I.1H ama argl4M!$LCI .Yay. PARADISE RIDGE HOMES • /& PACIFIC SCENE HOMES andMmS mar SSA PC Gmw I.vl a.aa re av* ewe3Tlx PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLAN 1. 0. eaRfOiC a MAY, tl.W+N • Nraau L" I I- I SMErT A2.1 iY 54 EI :pp EF E6 Le ab bs I •a• PLAN ID • RODRIGUEZ + SIMON MS DESIGN ASSOC INC . 1...,41111TECTS • • • FOR. PLAN SHEET NOTES, LEGEND AND ICEY REFER TO SHEET A2.1 • FOR mum PLAN SHEET NOTES, LEGEND AND KEY NOTES REFER TO SHEET A22 -S SECOND LEVEL UTILITY PLAN PLAN 2 • BEDROOM 5 OPTION Nik NNE 11. N. Ma ALL NONNN IUTSOAX AREA CALCULATIONS PLAN 2 W/ BEDRM. 5 OPT SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 1.4•Nr19-,42 seteuni noon 70.1. L.1._NNE VALE — N. 2414 SE AX4 90. PLAN 2 • BEDROOM OS OPTION nem wan TO NJ INa INNIS.V.TIONCK 5.17N. PARADIS▪ E, RIDGE H▪ OMES FAPACIFIC SCENE HOMES SAS E.X.Cel.smrr 5,4 mot,. Inv O. aim I% GU Ms, FAX [PLAN 2 - BEDRM. 5 OPTION • 1 5.5. coromm.w. • asn.m. , • • • I4Nrs,.. I-- I I- I SHEET A22 2ND LEVEL UTILITY PLAN PLAN 2 9P .1135130. 33313355 1ST LEVEL UTILITY PLAN aor5� .l•v PLAN 2 UI1LfIY PLAN SHEET NOTES 5wHL I1TA .. =MMingn• .:G Imo... no aeee-ie.xann O. TO MPN Aa SW- Va9PYL Lew Ie51. c• Pzwva-wL ealrtaVActa. PROV6 Me �N.IDMTCa IRN1TPe lNM4l 6. fa BE enomen. Inninn a>SKM 1STMOB. re. rtoent Fl1Wle Tn. rP[iIOMR M nant.,51301013 M. ALUMS MI MR( ton «mg. O&M> P# CDC. SEL11.I51•03. D. PatfVOMMC STwse,•Tee H. 4 155333.15.20.31.51.1.0.0053 1 4331,Y3/1e3 MLTXay(N. fFOAAV•iRWtW' tMP n•0 P.•IO GWYIAT IQI /OGYF WNW.. o4 m M cater 1PPLYYb 1.LT510153u1 1 0231305115153035 enne ILL PEARL PMIT[COAT 14.13.3501n.-NV. Men,. 17. •.t VbC cf CCT TK in,110OWa.16Ms 1IF 13505931119.36 OOIM. eW Oa MOVAI.R 15A TE.33.11105.34 MMa PCTILTM1Y•eec LCVI[b OGlb 0l Wen PLL Oa 2iam F.1 MMlYGICIIMIYILOGlI1t5. KaPP gXMK TIe •KNM.G•L 61.Piaa M. H31353-1.Y [ULM 1.3&i rtAEe UrM GOCI.W C fCeMG Olf CYlK11N1 GY6HY CYTORM1.6Cq. Inn/10TM Yen KM/Wm. RODRIGUEZ + SIMON Ilia DESIGN ASSOC INC . aC,flI icL. ai�sC i[oia [e.ii. tlivi Wu"E_Baia SHEET. LEGEND • OPna Omer in-w o- • »a31mR w 7r w.aneoi eencrw 0- aae.PMLr NP}nN M5+A a M A+' NVA pNM. E ee ew W e • +rv+.we omur a 0005.5.1. If] w"riZ7.0 Ome cr...s • aaweea • .Pvaml•.aLwnv sw56e VW! X m.MfM Jsexamergot ^W KEY NOTES O ril m•, yyrt P[NY YW •a61.2 1 PN P PRVCIDT • awl P.lva "L GPC *.CI QIOCSTal. re2C TO13a91'S rtN•i • OYiMW. 5e-9a yo5531531, PN 3.0 M i.MAC.CCMPK�ZP m wanIwmr ACMClllT PC GOYOIbI eerram c0 fCe15535 wo wumm mas PARADISE RIDGE HOMES PACIFIC SCENE HOMES P.OSCON'BS SPIT SW Ole GOT YSLHNRt M *TS akMrp PLAN 2 —UTILITY PLAN ea oninnee---3.4 onto 5 Of •• hV• SHEET A2.3 Ou *0 Nu) U� Z ON W OL Q s, 3; f d Fg o ispts flip 1 If, siir Wig•���� I ail ..s.. .A.4044SsA • w PLAN 2 - INTER: ELEVATIONS a 8 - it ma .ow .ou 1 u v), to 1 �ral."^au•iawmu2iww 0�.o4....1':,16 2,33: v.,„�+'�. 30.661ww: `w�nm1e6 irr="s ''I wm� Lirar=ro®w`�0.«r• wy''...3.Mne 1:. +w mn w1p r:^.' ''."` 'Y"4 jkf 3 1111;x;1111E1id1 t l!@i!: Illiiviril 0, g l$ dp �� �I� I � lyknRaRirPlailjhhli eC �a d 4a10d a§ i tl 0 I ecI- ri 4.141,61 s9 atl C • • x a PLAN 2 • ROOF PLANS M.... fV sY 11 i• • Iiiyij g!i ii llg • I. is 8i .11 ss R Ei! . • s 1, t,1� l�i li • s • 11 19 s p Tncwn ap0CILW •1�flfl1 ppn gun CROON _ dry• spy , AIS Nl Q111 1110 11� .. 5FFICi!!!i . ip k4 �e it Ain 1il ). • I• 65 85 .i 95 95 < i- 35 35 •€,5 ^@es 35 II.. II 1.1! ill li it Tv] ,vn! •a�µµnn swu un wa 3u 52031NM ®aiaYa a s s . s s s •pNpyN�LLY OA>J mtOpL CrONY 'pL 'IIfl�N10{ N 0_ Ll. 0 0 Lei LEFT ELEVATION PLAN 2A ReT. rat No ISCIMOREPTIS TO PR., ORVATI.114. 1 SC.. W'.IP r U RIGHT ELEVATION PLAN 2A .+. Rae mrx 1F R.Ra no.r.P.cmve-pfRanr1AT .uI RR P ..„,...0.,„,---,--------....„,,,,..._,‘,,_ //_~ uuluul A uuIuuIw t II If��I1_, IIl' .pLk �� 49 - ---., ...- --- :gr. �, r T6 ....I....t.. u 1 & a I i .a II 1 I.1� illy FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 2A REAR ELEVATION PLAN 2A We. .Pa x.rx NPOIPMTIMI No PP PRSPOPOSI W •U-.EV.Trw n.Nran- RODRIGUEZ + SIMON In DESIGN ASSOC. INC . ARCHITECTS Rr�. <IRALF .TR wan. sem M. IS PLANNERS IDN Mn r:•KI ELEVATION SHEET NOTES I. MN Wee.. l r ex+laot Mesa..B.W ERINL.x. a. MILVrIM.VArr.KIRibW.L OC MC W.M.WM PINT MOM N0.11.1NIW1.. M 4CGP*IL00I4.1IlS OmBMK WImMM'OIIBY LiRRRl.'X ,••,K 6 N1 WFY OMRb WMmWCORTi.INtt KLL.0.WpT.M IP ORTIM.S. �(. A.ICRTTrII me mummeso ein exam No66ir...... 4 TRT'..�A.XM�W AI NnWG.rbLLS Wer, rV perm. µRR IMi. rolwr Nnv RR •L Nr mecrwlxmT o.Tnaa ELEVATION SHEET LEGEND + .47.....E...,..N TIPP.WTm... ELEVATION KEY NOTES 0 L COi uw 5# .PA/ TIE a Rr.20Sill. /ULLETY. Np IRe_NWT.GT. • ISOINSOIL CORSO 1mO OHILM.LT %R.ltlb. T. VOCOR tGWo WOK MO1.lW'I.nl • umo-..herc.VlmL A .rtuepr. A �+N YYNO M.YN/YKIIIP NV'N.GLW. %DOE i YJf16`.. CtlL. WARM POW POOR I.Nv qn M.�inGmµ .. RA MS. Rim mat Mi.. PER VIM MINIM meteors Roma WOOS TL 1G14.6 ROOTItT SIO L5.1.1.0. IXNI. VvML/.d LLUW REMO[WW WK.U'K leM RT.",a.Np. rpm. co,..bKt.ar *400 r. u 1W�ii W 000m.c0TIrNSb GOMM seemmemem Room ...tyro.. M1.W.500; r•MI. RR NWt 4113. .at x P am.......E.ELONOMO KIM SL IR M. a toroR • YMI_ poP .WIm Ww.l[A F%1RM�Ir.. K. Pee.M.GW iA er 2w pt com..2' YLYM WYTi.0 Me.. W MAL NII MINI.NO. r:.MTN, Re.&Mous RV. W A+t R/w 10. IR-ty®pN:l..• NieNSI RM. • R INN. RJ4M.tT MM. W.V.L. MeterCll::•. Y POl® N. MIReler..MIT. 40V.TOR LKJTdL 0 ,.p.ar.,..E� • PARADISE RIDGE HOMES PACIFIC SCENE HOMES LR0LOXWf$5.3, mg/loam,. M nest. L CIO..IT PLAN 2A - EXTER. ELEVATIONS In Mewl.. CIA N....me ro eW.m.. • I.W Rl.3.R. 9ILLI A2.6 t: 6 i LEFT ELEVATION PLAN 31 MorT..O TER.., XvctlYTtl. NO DERR. lama W MOM MAW,. FlN12A.1. steel Wd•. I-1 RICHT ELEVATION PLAN 20 ?OR T.WA..rrnMronNooerAas 1•z. l• w•n••..ROR FUN AT WEER wi•. YA44 M'. RP. FRONT ELEVATION PLAN 2B REAR ELEVATION TfiR W`. FO` PLAN 2B RT. FOR Tn•µ pwmunm. no ORE,. mvr RO MO, mr•Anw WEN v AT Weer wr. YMF.W. M1r IN, RODRIGUEZ + SIMON IBM DESIGN ASSOC. INC . vN•wrC.H•a1.x¢ E C Tt 5_ d.lm Tlaw)sl i•IA p••e�•i��niW •• • • ¢EVATION SHEET NOTES .. ua WNiT WIN/i VOtOR..N.RW nev.nD. MS 1 WOKEW.WERI,OVma KIpnSZW.ne YO b.NI.. we oRERRo.Roo Ablff'WWnbORG COOPER H4�� • • MTMI6TCGO fAl1V0..TW[•MCO.IRDW W'Y1T1i1N Y! .uia¢b(NrRtA9l Rr a 69A K! T4FG6LIn3M.VIWAT RICYR FYIS _ rO LIMLL MT... RISER ro ROW PIN KR TR'A MGgllnl 3. NKr errors ELEVATION SHEET LEGEND - IA4Ar6 ana+e Dew Loam., =I= To imam. ELEVATION KEY NOTES O • =.7.. wort swZ="1n.vcm•, LJ10.Rd4r(MO m b541iraVKMWfY I. 2. •:M.%COVER EL% PRY. PRYER PER SPECAKA1NW. • Ta7C4N•afaaa pope Ml. WCW AAI. •Yta rvaL Tqt • • .��. n¢nwPepsi em..o.wa. vc.•• • wlm weu r¢o ewn- wvRe•ux ea WrlvNcrae.N 5.• MAR, MAR.PP.=lna N.W.Trcva Gaa ETMo iempr...n Ar.n 14P.e. r.u'ee wsm0Glda ARRnrct. LL RR, REAR. III . MR.. GCgt RV IVueL TbG¢ RR AT•P WN. NYr! G JAM • .ELMO KMC•r¢T. Aurournar.r mecca ay kr,wn PVN• Mr CORM. TRH LPOpMN • MIRY wTMttW!ERKPAR VCR.. VMTVD.ml •4.•rq El /ARAM pnwlec, 40644NYII A'F Yw•K n war GW.RecrN.Innw wu .G+tglw. mnOM • Nw``'iRUM, "�` 36._.0•OC INORA mr vOR n. .¢oaRwr sIG¢nE.OTaN POOP..aA Ft 41C.fF 1CIN.M1MVWM woof' W nW. GGTOTMI rta i. 154:114R1RM4 y,-RnER. II O/6.¢iRll+ARul. 25. WT IIXATV4NLF cc•A.C•Pr°. • • PARADISE RIDGE HOMES • a PACIFIC SCENE HOMES mross— •veaaaag1nlm YIMaWT¢eH NWraa.•.60 PLAN 2B• . EXTER._ ELEVATIONS .A .n4A16E .+a Kraals DEIPPER • I•F RAT '1 ".C.a. 1-- PLR SHEET A2.7 d m %V 14 al KK ova .Z.t1 .+ rz:1 fare' r.:..w wnri xwautiontell uwra.rssnmina w..newnrw z O z z V s PL a SECTION B vn"In?"•.""A0 71117101,7a'�s�u.�.'"'. �.40:.:°.`.°,` :: 'of°�we''�'a a�nn 'o'":w� '@'"0....0� ems. nm.m.:.oes.n. • a ii as 11 z 5 17. .repro 4 �R ECD Est EE SECTION E a Apt 10,1 war MUM x wu an NI an.r.`rvnaeeam OmoiKni Pliot uoma au n...�.oe..0 as w. mo..`�`°�=MOvat:�ww""e.q ...-areats."a sass. X• St atost�a �siarot Ho st°` n'O.w mo •o�.az+xw n.o�same an,.w coax inn �. 4D flit Y Op RIB k 11 ] E ; : E c. e w E E EEEEEE E e IH Yi {i;;j;j1; 1Y;/Zt11 1P 111 1}11IC0('il isit.t =} 1!1ti1{. r111111 i;l1llt't#it�il 1 #11 r . lilt { I4e it jlt i1 1 j #�m� t �� t` :6t. r P P 1 f 1 1 ;} EMI # t 1 t# It Ito! if I I lil f } t� tft It li. 11 l At l 1 1t 't 1 1} 1t I t 1 1,11 1' 11 u 1 rt' i e 1111111 11 I �l I _ i 11. a t 1 E E, E. El till ;fit ttjj ii;? I j fit€ ttl1t1 tjjj1¢11 ?J114 -lift ; t tE } lil 1Ii i rt•EF{1 {_ I I ) Ail 1={/dk=1 l ft fir = t_ rf1 IIIN# 1 ! )11 < .1 .1 { it !VI ir Hi 11 1t ' € llsl#x It 111 .t lh tt ill! t. lei e E E' EEEEE E EE1 E E Ee E"c4e1 pe 11111H11 11 11 1 {� t{ { tzf It i i # t l 11.��,tlfi 1111 ht�}!m{!oi _ 1111111 11f=f F1 I ;�; IifII11l;t l r l { I { j(t 't til.Ili rpll1{ 1 It I '1 t1 101 I it, it};lilt 1i 1 Hi 111 li l € i I 11 � l�lll . t 4(� fil j = r tp Itf;)Sl tl`s i 1!(E3ltt�l� CANYON VIEW NATIONAL CITY CA FOR PACIFIC SCENE HOMES LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT a 4 8 TYPICAL LOT PLANTING PLAN MING PLAN -AREAI ,CHAEL AVE. oo.a<Ir. ETEZ rw.+r /SCAPE $CAPE • ITECTURE PATRICIL A NIOGINBOTLIMI 3964 EFTAAVENUE. STE G BANDEGO,CA92103 Phone 619.291.6565 F130819.291.6636 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT REVISIONS IMAM Y. 29 NOVEMBER 2004 AS NOTED PLANTING PLAN AREA 1 • & TYPICAL LOT .xeEr. CANYON VIEW NATIONAL CITY CA FOR PACIFIC SCENE HOMES LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT ESCAPE $CAPE • rrECTU E vrn PATRICK G. HIGGl EOTHAM 3864FIFTH AVENUE, ME G SAN DIEGO. G492103 Rana 019.291.6595 Art619.291.4001 0. per onre' 29 NOVEMBER 2004 raaE AS NOTED IRRIGATION PLAN AREA 1 & TYPICAL LOT L-4 F CANYON VIEW NATIONAL CITY CA FOR PACIFIC SCENE HOMES LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT 5 F • |m«!u^ ||\|\'� k1 !. I 9| , ,l,#_Y a m,�. ' |7 k• lei / / e , e ,• @§ @� ' |l 1 ` |5| ' '}} 6 4 --.. CANYON VIEW NATIONAL CITY CA _�. ____ LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT 2 ) ] § .1-00.007001-01000 TrYIPT a-�acree..AwX..0 v.X.m Nat, aTui`~`ieLLlwwmam:w S.f50a RPLUOR Cv..EO wRaE .m. ..roe w........ ' 00000 0100.0440 v ALYS I �iP.LdM m�vM 0.1.08LT Xm¢L.T00 WING 00LC w.wIIC YS TYPICAL StSTEM LAYOUT FOR PRIVATE LOTS RRI3ACIOH WITH SLOG CONDITIONS • _1 1 Rm,eN.ao. CO.IV iipme• - mGv+IMa.. vuwmwmX.e.. �W a 00 �00 O sou, one AT EA. commit ▪ TO ...Jog FORMar= mLOTI -I+ PS-P. ▪ catTan ‘Ii iroYee nlw' ?Pd. .w/.NIIIT 4R MS II'lllu P. n.1Ww0. w-.M4MM1POa R.F.Kw.OM•OO. • l▪ c..aV PVLTNtl .04 ai ..T RTNYVmr..w Am Y I IR c. p.xC'eRHwre�R-V=Va ..a.2T10.110m,wNiXMiLreet¢ Ma w.XrmT.MaLan wE.s •a.¢v O. Ma ➢.LAOCIT Tv. err PING Il�1G IlR FLOW SENSOR .Axo cex Type Ta.:eTm ..wrn u:.-ene.wwt wm �.w^'"'Fee�'m+iai'"eos"'•. X'-. vu... -.mannl. I}wmwwee : �mena-MwEcoa am eanw-RlMcae MM `�.ww.a.�.W wLM..R..am Ins elms eawx.n amc+s�. �s�ax w-u�nwa�mrx.om ca.A.m .wZ of Nmme. - '.mv ie.waewru aawww n'� p Ist RTI.MMpNLLMG...I ry.ypEma➢yR 4a� N w[w nMw c. rnwnc w'Iv, era ., roTK1 ..... In FMXY'warat...,,Ntileta C....- .mATFLOrtPR IOMDEVI.l BAGKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE OCPNTROLIER WITH STAINLESS *TEFL ENGL051RE I j 1 �' w. r.ma... ma w me mo.o u u.moe MM owmwme....m . .mu aEMM- . Ta..<-A._ *wvm.w. mw. . •wrrua w doe, nni.,e.ov.....41 e�avcornrow !Ex io roe ayc ewnsa.w. m.µ.a N°10 Mama..mw. wm. Ee.Tnm .aKnw 0201.0100 1. MMwvxnm mu0.rwlmms¢.zxMi0 30 V w.p.m. wz.N +gal. 4 WATER CONTROL VN.VC mTml1.4 mamma 001.M W. }K KMbLYN KVCDrli- w4- Iva 5014 LAA NG...1. ¢ITC AVID. M1 b rya Ms.11m RCM t oO ITwwkiomumlL i eV} .MHe. NT.v Oman. IF 0010100.0000.0000 AOMMwce M-0.Wm MfJV.I'C. YAR.eP'R VaLCT� tm YVfl fC faYSAv ro doom u. vtiv0 vu TOT.W.VIp raMNO -rnM1 u aure4 .ate .uTn`l`i Aro"`m4ALe°A.•WISTOILOT ViivT••-LAT.G.0 rm w..Xae'ar`rlGw mraTwTrM 4W1141Oa m IY. fdma • Fin MASTER CONTROL VALVE I ! - r o-2Iv,o TON ,COITEOLLR . nauw w.u.enTER '0r mmnNi "IamM .`. aw 001 V0T 0.00110000 o- lal.lmCn... ..roan. w.M1aAL.aenXM aay. W R/4lVM1 wor nAl.IK.MaI Miwmw TOT • G2) IRRIGATION CONTROLLER INDOOR m-- WALL -MOUNT J 1 0,0 ;®LYS IMO..,NE*17. 1.XC 69.. EL..Tr.. ▪ aw,.N.RM,..mmm.M MrmG Me w:.e....Ia 0.1.0C 00OW03X.AMO./000- WW..,.„,S NVEYM mono. 00L Ce OA YR11Asq ro o- iE Al Va• O.T.L.. n`wb Le -Tare ar.� w Imam up, mY lla.mwwv.a.e.. S,,..x m,,, PMVIae,flic�� �T0T000ATA�f� IT- 1'IX.OXRirlm. ▪ M ICE ry➢ b� 0.. VMN.aC W lmamr3V W La .O WENT T1L IM W.m..G IL�aICTiLmMc .XO y. _ �L � %.L.00 Ml 000.- LOT d. 00, at ..... N`l5 WwI.KLO am )WW w vese 0 O.w/s.1.44 TnA. wu.¢ LEM) TO RAMNNOLL re eut ew _w 0.1.47 a..ta m.r� T. lwrr.w.e. O. SRO¢ M,,e•to ... Y 00e.000 E2 SAL- VALVE FOR MAINLINE ISOLATION I L J yuLt¢ylm na 0001 q vp.K MA WRMYVLM mmm lanlMnw T_ Ia cwMVrY 0.11011100-00 Mau il.++rzw pLw.IsLmannun Imo. rx w.w...e E3 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE J E /SCAPE 5CAPE ITECTURE 110101 PAIR/MG. MG99wU011Vu 0164 FIFTH AVENUE 31E. 0 BM DIE04 CA92103 Phone 618291.EA5 F0619291.5566 LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT Cq/NR0 B'h. °AlE 29 NOVEMBER 2004 a Ns NONE IRRIGATION DETAILS L-7 l 1. a▪ Y coma -nag- TM ▪ T.'SUM01.11L.GO m. a. LALL POLL. LOA LEST +i+c L.4 uir 41.VO Se. bcX,• TEE-JM1 ♦. ryG IOC bEI ecO QYLIVOLIL c-TV1 N:rrx2nti LP. AKM ILL. Tor m6.GR use Ax'aA VAIL /COAL learnazo P . ...Lotto tto AT AM uQ4WR•LILL} -SLOP b Tax ArtXULm �▪ ��� us ccoLL, LAbxAlww aR - yn[ GO.1Ea VAN. 1.42I0.1 0.OIL MILL LTILT a-OI ``o-YN WLLm YEY.OmT. rIISN MNM. r M IN PPM MfF x-N.fm.rw`OO ILLY DR 11.0 L.A.1I•- ty Lem ALL OLLLLIOPI mOLLTcTLI nw:I: 4rOXExALL SRO me Lc s-MI eR.L. MOLL p-V+AX LC WILLLOLL lb. LPL TLC L.1Re 0 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE ANfI-SIPFION O WICK COUPLER VALVE J I. V To t-`wn'�Oc'"70e-alp mIw GIx. RAm.+�wmi +-eTm eL.mL L- T rR 9X41 E9 n. LNLM`?u. sierra LMmaro LY ,no * Do CT;w twea •le' b]rGP'fLYLTL Maq.am ., TRENCHING �. i-Ieu+n iRn°AL'i•5 ww MILL MO coy,: LP 11-Loo maXLTx _ uww.. 41.014401.T ICTIUL Law COIL, PS AP 1COUILP • NO ,cm LLetO CIS. 3Mr x N•VALVE DR To.``jr,„ 1.srsa..enent, tiros wee x- MueK MRf- Ce. FCM GLR'@. LANIEL Ma* TH aax,wws AM .,e SLIc9cim m Rro..s..OE tlMp P-4GW xMp YTpR A ILL, PL. OT CrM SILL WILL enLif LOLL 14 Lod. eV n Rex. Nela cm, 0.„PM LTA ILL LOLL. L.vxM,erLVWL�mM Law IN VII_VE mom.. MULL ▪ fLCAILVRI RP YCII GLRCV IL VAL ILIA. Re ...KRILL LART16Y MO A-LLILL. NmT.ous AMMAN • MEM., eoe1L G IL arm. 'COOS DILL OEMOLL MIL ILL MOIL AP 1114L OP LOUD LOB rtLL@naaWL L AT ILL 1• ILK OL LIM LP OI r ROIL LPL w; Re e2awT LGT O.ZMOLe 4oci• umnwer. ;,IL erre PILL Po.. W. FLO Le To Re lwE U1u1 Gn,e L Iesr_ coLTNtI rnw mIw-+. POLL BOx ...ma 1`"w-c.auvt LATEAY I+LA..raaMA. MN, Los Lem.. rwe�" met Lynn Ma Lem LLoarIAJoILooL ;^ILLL.LeA• oe.LI»1`A+.e- INAikr. ROI ilmw. OR GTOww To COw..4�Iw-[i a6aT. FLL•V ROL P. /LPIL./LCO LPL WLLOIL NILE rim ran au. gxerra wGL6.1.1. LGL f14OLWMN IV MVP VAVCOJA LY AL 0 PIPE AND WRE UNDER PAVING I POP -VP NP_4D I f- A- ILLS LPL M41.1.6o1.Mrtm T 4Tf mew LULL RYWwW sGWRI VKvt! MULL Re M.V-m TO AUL u6RYAwfx6131151Tw VµVe ROLV/ATt OeL6 MUU. DLL �o ILA OnL. xw MILL* *Lee IXTo Lie n eLPMµeaXrLLovea %WLro E1ALL O L Mf%VAL,.aeL.T To ;Lures Lorta T "LW LOLL. N" R PLOP COIL LLA K. • LLCM LOLL L WYx*0 LW- PO L.rR ARROW, inY;AX T Ma/V O4MrvEIICti. Law sox fOTIOrW 6N'GN'G IbIVNMK VALVE LTXLLAO.3 ram R.N6 eL 47 Mar roR MILL ex &aweCiD/w�V;aoran NMDW LL IMC�Vn_X remm INvi TYeIGAL VALVE BOX INSTALLATION AND IDENTIFICATION YJ wL.af CLAY a. Y.0 voILL le nLow.: RTc }MT4ON� PLAY, WXVM.Vr MYN CO R 6L I PCP W TAT 04,13,11LeVYR PK LiTL Loa, Lip ILXLX MMRIP LI. McUxTIMCLXLNTMW- ALP MEL AµeL ON SILL XeLE e-Lxea MLR LOL.9w 0 5HRLE. HEAD ON C rpm I I_ J E /SCAPE SCAPE ITECTURE 44444 RAMPoO(G. HNi06100T11414 3604 FIFTH AVEMJE,STE. SAN DIEGO, CA92103 Phone 919.291.0585 Fax 619.291.6666 W u Iz 0 FOR PACIFIC SCENE HOMER LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT RMS 113 PRAWN Er; re 29 NOVEMBER 2004 arse NONE IRRIGATION DETAILS • L-8 p r . Sr r j" r, r Fr tF, r 8 t " lr " tI[tY t ` , L .;i; t} Jiilgg F ii; lift !Pi j 1Id I;i Pi ijj l� e it S f€tt It t tt i (� tir t 1! [tit° !n li d : it I 'Ill r Ili it $ ?d ii e I y 4 lit ii 1 t i;e YD r j sr? jrl ed a tt {aria i� Ili r Yj ttdif ii1 t` [ 'f Y�i IEI Iti ri t4.1111111 ir�t3j s 11 pi I,Y f is f1 r "': drlii tI t iI 1 ti i 7 i ! , 1 ! { 'rri t,t.t i r i 11j 1 }it Y 1I ,1 d'1 t ; f� ,Y' 3 FY ? ill 3"3tt tt it P.1 t „ .i 1S, li 3'f rt 1 Ii ; It !1; it t ii = Ft iI iL i �'Til li i' _� lid t1�t ! I at iri dt ij`f f i a 1 c I ° r r !S7 1 ti �� It ktt !Ili ���' ; !t�( ' 1 4 ' 1 ltt rii 1 rltl t 3 t it `p S����[ .� Ili }t. j tg 7 ��YI ��! d 1 pt it t .t irPr III t:tr 1 t. i! aiyi IjII l 1 ill tii '1 i 1i 1 r11i 11 x'f t 41 1 t t't1 1 dt it jIl lilt I d 4' �1I t 1S{` Pr � jS{ I tr� Pi 941 t t1 t " 7r ,` I f 11 a1' I II % i +yi t iii! ! 7' it(IIt ! f ry'y . ii 'Iiyt R 1 it d It t} Y t! t I, ; 11 td i .! tI Et tll r �, t St I;#� Si it i 3d1 •i iv itr i( 66 1 i 1 (I r =tI i ii 'it' rtlt 1t r t t t 1i t • I, # ;lI 1,i-it it it it` 1 gs r 1 r r Y: $, t 7" hilt d. j- { d t ffi 1 111 Rail IIi tt`1il l }milt itii ti t'dF t;#i1 h t Itlt:lii'F€iilllj i ,rjtii li tS4ft t ;ti�€E :111110, 1 �iftt�l�lit 3d14;�1 1��Itt�It!iS���ft E� iil+Pia1t `�1{t-1iii'jEii;ti111!1 [ NII11 t11 ttt.tr i1ir1 ittiitI t lifail 1 i $ ° I} pi li i l i s # {1 ;•# if tt l ,? t 1r a IS I 1 r ` ii t? }III 1 II I aI I tiij ft i`F[ . j4yt PP Ili Ili 1 Iiiii Id I I I i t �!� d�?I 11 S i {tit IJ 1111 ! t 11 11 1 t t I t t I I` i'i1'lj €i ll #1 i' ;t I; lit 1 a tt 11 1 1 1 1 j 11 illt;1� I I •itI t' I ;tit • t ¢ r t } Will t� 1l till 1 ' r I�l � 1 j 1 t �, ,,i, 1F f I tt j{ t r �1 I 1 , 9 �i ' i t 1 3 r 0 m a m W SA fa� •t ii -trip Pqr t '{ii°pPrl�Ei `j., at�� i I t�� tIl Il.t ihililit ,� � tilir3Fi�Ilti1itii1l i;rY'ti iltli 111 ti t} 111i11;il1 gilt t II ii iil(°I;Ii1ifttlfa1 f ft lilt 11111�t(tI '• tt t IIr ft k::11 jt1ti i tilt r ?!it lii j`l i 1" j11 ,t r_ t It ,i trt I 1'ir 1'• e 1 1Il it t¢}a t tt� t ds__(( to iti rp tlirijl tI i t t t 1 s1 t t d t;''it tt i1[} 1 o In i id i i titt s r ti E 1 1 III tt3 1 1, i� 111•i1i €f i i i 1 11 1 1r r ,' III t I I 1 'i Ir r t i t t f t i i , r Ili 1 I t1I'ii th. 1 1 i It id 1t 11 I i i j i t i f 1 I .; 111 ,fit iift tI IfjjiS { i rill' II 1th t I it ii is 1 fit, ? 1 i I . its • 1' 1 at CANYON VIEW NATIONAL CITY CA FOR PACIFIC SCENE HOMES LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT ijt !! I' r• 1il• [` "= j'f C Y �Ee=, �r S a ' ri Etr}r 1 'Ili to . [T Tlr r ,�Y F ii T !T ;� }� rt '( Q r t F I !!! {i1= ili ti lj f rl t[ t` i i[r1,� :� I j i �t j i t f[ iT !� i1` i t It i}i ll li t i r` I' Iei i : 1 ii I t f 'r = ! 1rit' iI Ij it l' : II 1.! fi 1i1 #t - jir l9� jII rI [ t,t i! #t POI , t [�y' [•ii 1114 tf i [ �lt'i [ I S i� lie r ! [ �'I t d S�� 1, S 4 tt It I, ,.! ri 1 r 1! 'i C ti` r I i- t r .iri fe fffl #i` I r f . •, it ;j It 1 r t[ Ill! ili j ! LIN' kip # I j[ iit [ 11' iif i ' 11 7t111' • 4 �I i[I {`f I IF } r E el [ r �� ' t 7�• i � � Irj�; � , €r ' 11 I} 1F th t ` �(a "� i Ii Er t ik [t}r ! . I[ Ili {, f�tI{� �# I ; j� �e ii 1��I`l Igr i I;t I t; i 1= I- t ill t i € ,Lt#r Ili'. ttr °t i 1 II It; ,., r r f lIrl lb _ is ' i[" d la 1 [ t ti!=i # [ , to ( ill ? ] + �! !t iit �( rr ..i t 'till t ` 1 1•l.I]gj to [[ r it 1t ,I it tl t {l i T#t ii ii It , t [;l ty11I 1 t r tili ! IF t }I[ r II I # T 1,r ii II { i I r,1 {tr= ii F 5 t f3 # j[ * hit I I! .'1 } 1 I Ii , �gg`r , ! " i� • ! ,r; sop �[[ p #' yt #gi' F 1!t- 1 t r ` I 7 i '1 i' 1 Ili " `' li ' 'jr 1, i i i ' lil • I I� ! � l 'T t ; 1a r r > Y n r r 1 9 In s Y • r tr . .r '.14 r -! > r > 1" jT itIIIif — icl rriiiiiiiiiiNillifallidili i[;i,[i1j[iI[1i , ":"{ .. 4 j[ipil` ll,s # iI tS; i, , [ r r I I r'[ 1 I ! Itt # # # r j11 t oil It [! tir t it,I II l i {,a !ig [ 1 ii tI ti- ! S r ! hilt!. [1## ii. ' hit, I 1 {tr � t Ott r.I j ` I = �'i jj l,[ir�,I['#(nr t[g I 1 �filt III i 1 ,i Hilo Illtir I It[ Ir v [11i( id oil. . 1 ! S l '1 ' i1lr : i It' ' t 1` I i[ I I � [ Eh1 € t i [" It ! `' t 1 it 7 •'i ;= t�I 1 iI f I t r! r r [ t tr`` I i }=. .t I Ili it } ' ` I 4; # ; (iti i I [ ! iI i 1 i( i r I [;l lit i1 i t I [[ [[r1T r'I [ ii 'Oil ! III: i j i. 1 [i 1 ,i, r ! II[ i 1 ii t, trii ill t o ` t[ p 1i i i ti i f 1 It I [, 41 I i 9 its i.1 1 14[; j n i o fi 1 1 jot ri[ t #,, �[ 1t }[ i Igg I #t l{t #t 1� j #1 i 1' fil, 1 ii,, 1[ ti 01 I}I 11 t! . I t: ;t►i I {f{, „# jli 1 } { F! ,1 I i - ! I 1 111 ! ( It 11P i '[t 1 !i pi Sr .`r 1 !� 1 ti II t. 1I1r ii 1 i*F ti [` 1p L B j i i [id 1 i = i#t 1 II . [it I i ! (l i 'I 1i } tI II It ti tg [ I. t i7 1 I i ` [I} i [ ii 1 .h 1C1 III] ! II 1 Et i i1 Iii I[ d i 1} II ii I I ( 1 r 1 f t it 1 It ' ,1 y t 11 11.l` , ;1 i : I; ; t II t }` [ II tI t. tr > r • pill > i, a rr n, ,.ri ,a IrrIv{{{j'174}Iti'[I `q jr t,7t19it 4I [3(ie[iir.[ ii iDi [t i1#i 1 ' i 11 ttf# s tf j ili'ri[[l a iI t t11•!! IIIi i•'yII tt' i•1iItf I f I f1'1l fi# tt I(i{ �i t!' i '[ti i t tr 1 'I [i Fr{r[rn i7y.[` ![t 1I 1 g1��It1{1�i�t I I[ ,Itlt l�Il:i I II II F w of i ,It "r . i ill .i it 'r I II I E I t•7 , t `1 4#F 1 t r i 1 It t 1 I II I[ It r` I 4t1I I{t{fI�[1tl 117jiiiiIfItIii �_11#IIl)!r+111jE jjr't rt I+ i!'tri1i!z�il Sjjj;�'f�Ei1[1I!, l!rt `rI1 (F {r NS ] d {1�il !{ 1 i 11 �I iii�• �t! t rt II �f . ;I 'i rj1� j;j i ' ` (S11 ( i! E tI 1 I fill ill' IIIfi II iii ; 1 1L 31 LI;t 1 r[ [j ,[; ►, If- j 1[ }I 1 I i1 t F` I Vi I! I I 1 II [y; 't #1i 'i ill 1 i" i 4 [i 7 1; 2! ii Iri 1[ ell i 1 i `tt1 1 it t i t 1[ 1 ti ;t fit[ IP I I1 i PI j li ill i [ Jill 11.;;I 1ri ► �' ftri 1i't;1 it ri ai 7t I'i I[ I Iii i I sr I t I i} 1 it 1 1 i i 1+;, t rt IS �lr it ` i I tI i _ Y` p ii S € f 1 [i [ t { i aiI r # {' i i +, t r; t jr i t l t[ i r f V V ,1 1 1 t) 6 t tf f[iiiiii 'rli 1 �iiiiliiii#1 tIIIii tjj IU ti t t 111 r llj I I rji ii' !t 1 tt` IIII i. I NI I 1 1} i 1 m21 02 z to m u CANYON VIEW NATIONAL CITY CA FOR PACIFIC SCENE HOMES LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT 1, .cETING DATE May 17, 7005 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 22 %ITEM TITLE Public HearingAn Amendment to the Boundary — of the National City Downtown Specific Plan to Include Properties at the Southeast Comer of 8`s Street and D Avenue (Applicant: Howard Blackson for Gulf Unlimited Corp.) (Case File No.: SP-2005-1) PREPARED BY Andrew EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT on 336-4310 Planning This proposed amendment would add a half acre site at 8th Street and D Avenue to the Downtown Specific Plan to allow for a greater intensity of development of the property. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item at their May 2, 2005 meeting. The attached background report describes the amendment in detail. ( Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the recommen+ . tion of the Planning Commission. N/A Addendum to Certified Program EIR Approved By: Finance Director Account No. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Specific Plan Amendment. Vote: Ayes -Flores, Baca, Saludares, Reynolds, Pruitt, Carrillo, Martinelli, Alvarado Absent: Crraham ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Background Report 2. Recommended Findings for Approval 3. Location Map A-200 i91s9i Site Photographs 4. Application and Supporting Materials 5. Community Development Commission Comments 6. Addendum to Certified Program EIR 7. Certified Program EIR BACKGROUND REPORT The area proposed to be added to the National City Downtown Specific Plan is located at the southeast comer of 8th Street and D Avenue. The 21,930 square foot Nil acre) property has 117 feet of frontage on 811' Street and 187 feet of frontage on both D Avenue and an alley on its east side. It is located in the General Commercial (CG) Zone adjacent to the eastern boundary of the recently approved National City Downtown Specific Plan. The site is currently developed with a restaurant (Taqueria el Guero) and a single-family house. Nearby uses include St. Mary's Catholic Church to the north across 8th Street, a small commercial strip center adjacent to the east across the alley, a small office and apartments to the west across D Avenue, and another small office adjacent to the south. The properties to the north, east and south are all in the CG Zone, and the properties to the west are in the National City Downtown Specific Plan. The applicant is requesting that the National City Downtown Specific Plan be amended by moving the eastern boundary across D Avenue to include the project site; no other properties on the east side of D Avenue would be included within the Plan. The proposed amendment to the National City Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan in several ways. First, the General Plan encourages revitalization along commercial corridors such as 8th Street. The General Plan also encourages mixed use as a way to revitali7.e commercial districts and provide new housing opportunities. The proposed amendment would achieve both of these by allowing a greater number of residential units to be built on the half -acre site. Under the current CG Zone designation, the site could be developed with a moderately intensive mixed -use development (i.e. ground level retail with about 17 residential units above and a floor area ratio of 1:1); the design guidelines and standards of the Specific Plan would likely allow around 7,000 square feet of ground level retail with approximately 40 residential units. Also in furthering the redevelopment of National City, the amendment would ensure that any future development of the site would meet the design guidelines and standards of the Specific Plan, which are aimed at creating an active and attractive urban environment. The half -acre site would be subject to the design and development standards in Development zones 9 and 10 of the Specific Plan (see attached Application and Supporting Materials). For example, development on the northern half of the site would be limited to 90 feet in height, and would be required to build to the sidewalk and to provide vehicular site access from the alley or D Avenue. Community Development Commission (CDC) staff have indicated support for amending the Downtown Specific Plan to include this site, since it is abutting the downtown area and is located on the primary east - west road (8th Street) within the downtown area (see attached CDC comments. Under the authority of the Specific Plan, future development of the site would not require a Conditional Use Permit, but would instead go before the CDC Board for a review of consistency with the Specific Plan. Thus, the Planning Commission would not review the design aspects (site plan, building elevations, landscape plans, floor plans, etc.) of a development proposal. Environmental review in compliance with State Law was conducted for the Specific Plan. It culminated with certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) at the time the Specific Plan was approved. The PEIR examined many potential impacts (i.e. land use, traffic, noise, air quality, etc.) that could result from the implementation of a Specific Plan that allows intensive mixed -use urban development. It identified a number of impacts and appropriate measures/actions to mitigate the impacts (see attached Program EIR). The attached Addendum to the Program EIR updates the Project Area in the PEIR to include the half acre site at the southeast comer of 8th Street and D Avenue. As this boundary adjustment adds only a half acre to a 135 acre project area, an increase of less than half a percent (.37 percent), no other updates or changes to the PEIR are needed. By pulling the half acre site into the Project Area, any future development of the site will be subject to the mitigation measures contained in the PEIR (i.e. use of noise reducing street surfaces, preparation of noise studies and geotechnical reports, etc.). Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed amendment on May 2, 2005. At the meeting, the Commissioners confirmed that only the half -acre site previously described would be added to the Downtown Specific Plan area, and that the alley adjacent the site would not be closed. Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of the amendment noting that it will increase the likelihood of redevelopment of the site and that it is consistent with the City's General Plan. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 1. That the proposed amendment is in the public interest, since it will increase the likelihood of redevelopment of an existing half -acre site on the fringe of the downtown core of National City by allowing a higher intensity of mixed use development. 2. That the proposed amendment to the National City Downtown Specific Plan is consistent with and necessary to implement the General Plan, since the General Plan encourages high intensity mixed use development in the downtown core of National City, the revitalization of existing commercial corridors and the implementation of design standards to achieve high quality development. 3 CO 0 CO 0 IL 0- Z 0• 0 a. ›. en 11 re - z w — a. la 0 m r4 0 Site Photographs View of the half -acre site from the southwest View of the north half of the property at the corner of 8th St. and D Ave. from the northwest View of the site from the north looking down the alley on its east side NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA APPLICATION for: Specific Plan '/ Amendment of a Specific Plan Make checks payable to the City of National City File application with the: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 (619)336-4310 PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WHEN COMPLETING THIS FORM FOR. DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Case Number SP - Z005-1 SEE FILING INSTRUC77ONS AND CHAPTER 18.112 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE FOR MORE INFORMATION. I/We hereby request the National City Planning Commission to set a public hearing to consider a Specific Plan or an Amendment of Specific Plan No. , Ordinance No. or Resolution No. 2-Dos- D Le to accomplish the following: E X T 3CY i* -E' 4 J P,oWADAPI CR- 1\4 WkflOIJkt— CAV Oflw,1TDWA. S Z.tFic pkAxl (NcbcP 04E -1t.51.0 u - .11, -``j' 601NCE ti ` A Jl✓N►1� &LAA ' € bc1/4/12J n At lr $ i3-4 Slit -Cr- So LMA 181..5 r SO U ►I'1 rbwcr1.l1 G1`-�' ecer I'D {.(z A **m-03:< t?c f 4r. NOTE: Applicant must furnish an Assessor's page obtainable from County Assessor's Office or a plat prepared by a title company, a licensed engineer or land surveyor showing exact boundaries of the subject property. Sketches, maps, etc. that will aid the Planning Commission's review of this request are encouraged. Specific Plan or Amendment of a Specific Plan Application Revised December, 1998 Page 1 of 5 This request for a public hearing for a Specific Plan or Amendment of a Specific Plan is being requested for the following reason(s): AtoeL 1 'WE; N C V ' PP $1,0 C.z._ t S S; re'► NiQ (� �V 0.JT '1'D -" I 'f . -T-ks A L't CA►J Pic Qoss P m+1(06 LI, �' �OQN4�cr 't0 W CLJ 40 D USfr IkSOVer Cr/l,oOM6 � i i- lag)NA-IL Fwfl TT f' 1 , itts' PWoSikc. is t Co ►S Kti ` -rt.Teg, COhrneorCi a l C IN s P t F,�Ti i S (4t)T Atiauco t L T' Cu gam Gi AL. PROPERTY OWNER(S) of all property included in this application: (Attached extra sheets if necessary). Name: "., 1 Name: Signature `` �/ Signature (Signature ackno ges that this (Signature acknowledges that this application is being filed) application is being filed) Address: 1'3 Gj Ctd eel -oz Address: -c*IN. -- r�lA�i ONM _ CA-114 CA «� Phone No. (0(01 . 4 (o 5. Phone No. Fax No. tP12 , 4 Z 92 Fax No. Date: . �rj Date: Note: All owners ofproperty within the boundaries of the existing and proposed Specific Plan must sign their consent. Attach an ownership list with consent signatures for more than one ownership. Specific Plan or Amendment of a Specific Plan Application Revised December, 1998 Page 2 of 5 �1, 16 APPLICANT es that the information submitted with this application is true and accurate to the best of the applicant's knowledge). Address: 3 402-0 ''J S 1 - S4 C-A- 924 c 1l Phone No. tat - Fax No. Date: 2-34 . 611s 4S3 el -AN N \ ISGr 1-{vrOMM L-- - ATTACHMENTS: Land Use Code Section 18.112.090 California Government Code Section 65461 Specific Plan or Amendment of a Specific Plan Application Revised December, 1998 Page 3 of 5 NATIONAL CITY DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT (2005-06A) DESIGN GUIDELINES The following Design Guidelines per the existing Specific Plan will be implemented for the proposed project at 404 E 8th Street. The Guidelines are intended to allow for Mixed Use development building types with a multi -family residential component above ground floor retail fronting 8th Street, and multi -story row homes (town homes) mid block south along "D" Avenue between 8th Street and 9th Street. An alley between "D" Avenue and "E" Avenue will be maintained and is proposed to the eastern most boundary of the Downtown Specific Plan. National City Downtown SPECIFIC PLAN Resolution No. 2005-06 PROPOSED BOUNDARY The image, above right, depicts the proposed boundary adjustment. The image, above left, shows the existing Downtown Specific Plan Boundary and its regulating zones. The site is approximately .5 acres and is a half block fronting 8th Street and "D" Avenue. 10 DEVELOPMENT ZONE 419 8TH STREET BETWEEN A AND D AVENUES twig.• moor -cm r i I i■I■1 ®■ar; is is a Nisoszmark.ri-4ait'z .■■LII�I, I,I♦==y�■�LfIA � J�J.1_ MI II "m■ '91 II Development Intensity Floor Area Ratio: Maximum Height: 90' 5:1 General Guidelines: In order to reinforce 8th Street as a primary shopping street, its roadway width will be narrowed to discourage through vehicular traffic, and sidewalks will be widened and enhanced to promote a walkable retail environment. It is also important that development along 8th Street be mixed -use in nature, with a significant density of multifamily residential overlaying the ground -level retail. This will have the effect of creating a critical mass of residents who will view this development zone, and the entire Downtown core, as their neighborhood. The Specific Plan provides that mixed - use development along 8th Street will be of a moderate density and height. The objective is to provide a continuous street wall and a sense of definition and enclosure to the street - level activities, but not to overwhelm this precinct with tall structures. Preferred Land Uses: Mixed -use, with a significant density of multifamily residential overlaying the ground -level retail. Restricted or Prohibited Land Uses: As per underlying Zoning Regulations. Design Guidelines: • All structures shall observe a "build - to" line. Note that grade level retail space typically requires a floor -to -floor height of at least 15'-0". • Provision of arcades or colonnades in connection with ground -level retail development is acceptable, provided that such features are carefully integrated with the City's streetscape design plan. • Grade -level retail frontage should not be strictly limited to the 8th Street frontage but should also tum the corner and extend for some length along the A, B, C and D Avenue frontages to activate these key intersections. This is particularly critical at the intersection with A Avenue, which is proposed as a major pedestrian connection to Kimball Park. All retail facades must have a minimum of 50% transparency • All vehicular resident access and service access for retail facilities shall be from A, B, C or D Avenues, via internal service "alleys," not from 8th or 7th. • Resident parking shall be underground or "encapsulated' within the development site. Placement of parking areas, blank walls or service areas along street frontages within this development zone is prohibited. • Housing units facing 8th Street should have a strong presence on the street. Balconies facing the street are encouraged. Primary ground -floor residential building entrances must orient to the public sidewalk and street frontage on 8th Street. If courtyards or other outdoor spaces are used as entrances to buildings, they should open directly to the street. BUILD -TO UNE (MAINTAIN S1IUTWALL)� J J M®WA"e1SRY I IHIUDINUAL BTU 6110 81h STREET, Looldng East, From A to D Avenue zol 8th Street at National City Boulevard s 2 4 i z 0 '» "'• ERhSERVEANU ENHANCE THE - INTEGRITY OF EXISTING RESIDENTIAL. NEIGHBORHOODS 1 ill i! irr USE ROW HOMES TO FORM A TRANSITION TO SINGLE-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS Ili ; EC:1 1 1 MAKE ETH STREET AN F. ACTIVE PEDESTRIAN SCALE ' NEIGHBORHOOD�ttEB SIIOPPING STREET j�IF DEVELOP ML•DRJ RITV RESIDENTIAL OVERER STREET RETAIL TO PRODUCEA CRITICAL.' MASS OF DOWNTOWN RESIDENTS '' 1- DEVELOP A CONTINUOUS LINEAR PARK AS A FREEWAY BUFFER AND AN IDENTITY ELEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN CURE CREATE AN IMPORTANT CIVIC SPACE ATTHE NEW EDUCATION CIA RR ANU LINK 1T TO THE DOWNTOWN CORE EXISTING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Yar •ty 4 r§:9 y {�I T CREATE A S'I KONGFR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO THE TROLLEY STATION 1 �MAKF 9THSiREET A QUIET ., RESIDENTIAL STREET, WITH �iAOW HOME DENSITY AND 'REDUCED TRAITTC •EVIJANCE KEY :' .INTERSECTIONS REINFORCE FIE COHERENCE AND •TO MAKE THEM IDENTITY OF NATIONAL CITY'S MORE PEDESTRIAN- HISTORIC DISTRICT FRIENDLY AND SAFE I iifDi CREATE A STRONGER _PEDESTRIAN LINKAGE TO a KIMBALL PARK t t •1 DEVELOP NATIONAL ZiTy 1 1' 1 BOULEVARD AS AN IDENTIFIABLE 1 "CEREMONIAL STREET THROUGH `.THE HEART OF DOWNTOWN P. •P -,I '1 `- ,'i PROVIDEDEVELOPMENT OPPOTUNITIFA FOR HIGHER H FR DENSITY ANDBUILDING HFIGHT HT THATDONT NEGATIVELy IMPACT THE CALF OF TIIG DOWNIOWNCORE DIVERT MAJOR ARTERIAL TRAFFIC FROM NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD, &THAND 9TH TO STRENGTHEN THE PEDESTRIAN CHARACTER O_ETHESE STREETS l .L Com mural ly Development Cnmmission nl kational C'ilr 11:4i +` r R a IT ,, Existing Specific Plan Boundary Proposed Specific Plan Boundary Downtown Specific Plan Amendment 2005 -06A Chairman Nick Inzunza Members Ron Morrison Louie Natividad Frank Parra Rosalie Zarate Executive Director Benjamin Martinez April 27, 2005 HANDOUT • ITEM NO. 6 May 2, 2005 Preserving Hhmrys.. Shaping the Future Community Development Commission of National City Mr. Andrew Hoskinson Planning Department National City Civic Center 1243 National City Boulevard National City CA 91950 SUBJECT: REQUEST TO INITIATE AN AMENDMENT TO THE DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 8TH STREET AND D AVENUE Dear Andrew: The Community Development Commission (CDC) has reviewed a request to amend the eastern boundary of the Downtown Specific Plan. Gulf Unlimited Corporation's request is to extend the boundary to include their property at the southeast comer of 8th Street and D Avenue. The extension of the boundary allows the property at the southeast comer of 8th and D Avenue to be developed in accordance with the development guidelines of the Downtown Specific Plan. The extension of the boundary provides an opportunity to construct market -rate for -sale residential product that currently does not exist in National City. The creation of for -sale residential units and the opportunity to increase homeownership are extremely important to the CDC. The CDC supports the extension of the eastern boundary of the Downtown Specific Plan to include Gulf Unlimited Corporation's proposed project site. If you need additional information or have any questions, please contact me by telephone at (619) 336-4421 or email Qselbv((ci.national-citv.ca.us. Sincerely, fiteek Gerard E. Selby Senior Project Manager 140 E. 12m Street, Suite B; National City, California 91950 Tel.: (619) 336.4250 Fax: (619) 336.4286 City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR Program EIR Addendum Case File Information: Reference Files: Addendum Completed By: Date: Project Description: National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR SP-2005-1 Andrew Hoskinson, Associate Planner April 27, 2005 A specific plan with land use recommendations and design guidelines to shape and guide the development of a 135- acre area identified as Downtown National City. Background The City Council approved the National City Downtown Specific Plan and certified the Program EIR for the specific plan on February 1, 2005. Interest in new construction and rehabilitation in the core of National City led to the need for a refinement of the General Plan and development of precise design and land use standards to guide development in the core of National City. The Program EIR identified several significant impacts and contained a number of mitigation measures that have been incorporated into the project. The purpose of this addendum is to address the minor alteration to the project boundary. Project Description The Specific Plan provides design guidelines and land use recommendations to guide the future development of the 135-acre Project Area. The Specific Plan does not include any proposed projects or identify any specific development sites. When there is conflict with the underlying city zoning, the Specific Plan will be the governing document. The purpose of the Specific Plan is to help equip project applicants, decision -making bodies, funding bodies, and interested citizens with guidance on achieving and assessing the quality of urban design in redeveloping and restoring the downtown area. The Specific Plan is a document that will provide the City of National City a roadmap to develop the Project Area during the next 20 years. Project Change The only change to the project, which was considered and approved not more than four months ago, is a slight change to a segment of the eastern project boundary as shown on attachment 1. Specifically, the boundary will be moved across D Avenue (approximately 160 feet) to include a 21,937 square foot (half acre) site immediately south of 8th Street. Rnr.vnlei1 Paner Environmental Analysis No issues discussed in the previous Program EIR are updated by this Addendum; the only update is to the Project Area/Project Boundary. As the project area is increasing by less than a half percent (.37 percent) there is no potential for an increase in the severity of any impacts identified in the Program EIR. Additionally, as the property to be added to the project area is within an urbanized area on 8th Street, one of the primary streets in the downtown core, and the Specific Plan was considered and approved not less than four months ago there is no change to the circumstances under which the Specific Plan was approved. Justification for Preparation of an Addendum Pursuant to CEQA § 15162, no Subsequent or Supplemental EIR or Negative Declaration is needed for this project since there are no substantial changes to the project or circumstances that will result in new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified impacts. Furthermore, there is no new information showing that there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found to be infeasible that are in fact feasible but not proposed by the applicant. Lastly, there is no new information showing that substantially different mitigation measures than those previously identified would reduce significant impacts and that the applicant does not propose these mitigation measures for adoption. The Environmental Analysis and background information above demonstrate that there is no potential for new significant impacts or for a substantial increase in the severity of impacts identified in the certified Program EIR. Since the character of the project and the circumstances of the project area are unchanged the land use/planning, geology/soils, traffic/circulation, aesthetics, noise, air quality, hazards/hazardous materials, population/housing, cultural resources, water services, police protection, fire protection, school facilities, sewage services, and recreation discussions in the Program EIR are still relevant and need not be re-examined. /7 EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN BOUNDARY i L PROPOSED SPECIFIC • - PLAN BOUNDARY DRN. DATE: 4/27/05 NATIONAL CITY PLANNING 1 1 [i c c NATIONAL CITY DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Prepared for: Community Development Commission of the City of National City 140 E. 12th Street, Suite B National City, California 91950-3312 (619) 336-4253 Prepared by: Phil Martin & Associates 18195 McDuimott East, Suite C Irvine, California 92614 (949) 250-0503 SCH #2004011110 SEPTEMBER 2004 L EZ L TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 OVERVIEW 1 1.2 DEFINITIONS 2 1.3 BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2 1.4 STATUTORY AUTHORITY 2 1.5 ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED 3 1.6 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE 3 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 2.1 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY 4 2.2 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 21 2.3 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY/ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED 21 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 13 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES 23 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 23 3.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 23 3.4 THE INTENDED USE OF THIS PROGRAM EIR 23 3.5 PROJECT OBJECTIVE 28 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 29 4.1 LAND USE 29 4.2. GEOLOGY/SOILS 44 4.3 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 49 4.4 AESTHETICS 70 4.5 NOISE 77 4.6 AIR QUALITY 102 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 119 4.8 POPULATION AND HOUSING 124 4.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES 134 4.10 PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 136 4.11 RECREATION 147 5.0 OTHER CEQA MANDATED EIR SECTIONS 150 5.1 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS 150 6.0 GROWTH -INDUCING IMPACTS 156 7.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES 158 7.1 NO PROJECT 159 7.2 ENLARGED PROJECT AREA 159 8.0 ANY SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES WHICH WILL BE INVOLVED IN THE PROPOSED ACTION SHOULD IT BE IMPLEMENTED 161 9.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT 163 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED 164 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page i LIST OF APPENDICIES Appendix A - Initial Study/Notice of Preparation B - Notice of Preparation Responses C - Traffic Report D - Noise Study E - Air Quality Study LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Regional Map 24 2. Local Vicinity Map 25 3. USGS Topographic Map 26 4. Proposed Specific Plan 27 5. Existing Land Use Conditions 30 6. Site Photographs 31 7. Site Photographs 32 8. Site Photographs 33 9. Site Photographs 34 10. Site Photographs 35 11. Site Photographs 36 12. Photo Orientation Map 37 13. Proposed Reconfiguration of Main Street 58 14. Open Space Design Framework 75 15. Noise Measurement Location Map 82 16. California Land Use/Noise Compatibility Guidelines 88 17. Construction Equipment Noise Levels 89 18. Traffic Noise CNEL Contours 96 19. CO Receptor Locations 109 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Existing Daily Roadway Segment Conditions 52 2. Existing Arterial Levels of Service 53 3. Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions 54 4. Existing Mainline Freeway Segment Conditions 56 5. Trip Generation for the Downtown Specific Plan 59 6. Buildout Daily Roadway Segment Conditions 61 7. Buildout Arterial Levels of Service - Specific Plan 63 8. Buildout (Year 2030) Peak Hour Intersection Conditions General and Specific Plans 66 9. Buildout Freeway Mainline Segment Conditions General and Specific Plans 67 10. Noise Ordinance Exterior Noise Limits 81 11. Construction Equipment Noise Limits 83 12. Existing Noise Measurements 83 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page ii [: 13. Modeled Existing Roadway Traffic Noise Levels 84 14. Traffic Noise CNEL Increases With Project 90 15. Future with Project Traffic Noise Levels 93 16. Air Quality Levels Measured at the Chula Vista Monitoring Station 105 17. Federal and State Carbon Monoxide Standards 107 18. Existing Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm) 108 19. Regional Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance 110 20. Worst Case Projections of Carbon Monoxide Concentrations 113 21. Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Under Current General Plan 115 22. Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Under Proposed Specific Plan 115 23. Increase In Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Due To Specific Plan 115 24. Race and Ethnicity in National City, 2000 125 25. 1997 Household Income Distribution 126 26. Age of Housing Stock: 2000 127 27. Cumulative Projects List 151 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page iii This page intentionally left blank H 1 E 1 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.1 OVERVIEW This Program Environmental Impact Report (PEIR) has been prepared for the Community Development Commission of the City of National City ("CDC") to evaluate the potential environmental impacts that could occur with the approval and implementation of the proposed National City Downtown Specific Plan ("Specific Plan"). The Specific Plan includes the area generally bounded by 16th Street on the south, Interstate 5 on the west, Division Street on the north, and "D'' Avenue on the east and totals approximately 135 acres ("Project Area"). A Program EIR has been prepared for the Specific Plan in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and as allowed by the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168, a Program EIR may be prepared on a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project and are related either: geographically; as logical parts in the chain of contemplated actions; in connection with issuance of rules, regulations, plans, or other general criteria to govern the conduct of a continuing program; or as individual activities carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory authority and having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in similar ways (Section 15168(a). Therefore, a Program EIR was prepared for the Downtown Specific Plan. The certified Program EIR will serve as the environmental document required by CEQA for the Downtown Specific Plan as well as the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Code Amendment as required for the adoption of the specific plan. The Downtown Specific Plan does not include any recommended or proposed projects or identify any specific development sites. The specific plan is a document that provides development standards and guidelines for future development that is anticipated to occur throughout the Project Area in the future. For this reason, the EIR is intended to be a "Program EIR" or "Tiering EIR," with subsequent CEQA documents to follow in the event that specific identified projects are proposed in the Project Area in the future that exceed the thresholds of this Program EIR. It is the intent of this PEIR to address, as thoroughly as possible and without being speculative, the potential environmental impacts that could be expected to occur with implementing the Specific Plan based on information available at this time. However, individual projects within the Project Area are anticipated to be proposed in the future. If future projects comply with the development standards provided in the specific plan subsequent environmental analysis per CEQA will not be required. However, if future projects do not comply with the specific plan development standards, subsequent environmental analysis required by CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq. additional environmental analysis may be required in conjunction with the approval of future projects. Thus, this PEIR is the first -tier EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15152 for the Specific Plan and subsequent CEQA evaluation could be required for projects that are not consistent with the Specific Plan. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 1 1.2 DEFINITIONS The following bold and capitalized terrns shall have the following meanings unless the context in which they are used clearly requires otherwise: "CDC" means the Community Development Commission of the City of National City. "City" means the City of National City. "City Council" means the City Council of National City. The members of the City Council are also members of the CDC Board. "Draft PEIR" means the Draft Program Environmental Impact Report prepared for the National City Downtown Specific Plan. "General Plan" means the general plan of the City of National City, approved by City Resolution No. 96-145 on September 10, 1996. "Project Area" means the area covered by the specific plan. 1.3 BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION The CDC proposes to encourage both public and private rehabilitation and development in the Project Area to reduce and eliminate blight and improve the economic viability of the area. The proposed Specific Plan is the planning document that will allow the City of National City and the CDC to upgrade and improve the Project Area consistent with the Downtown Specific Plan. The Specific Plan includes design guidelines, land use recommendations, and an implementation program. The purpose of the design guidelines is to equip project applicants, landowners, decision -making bodies, funding bodies, and interested citizens with guidance on achieving and assessing the quality of urban design in redeveloping and restoring downtown areas. t The land use recommendations are designed to build upon, and integrate existing key elements in the Project Area including Education Village, Brick Row, Kimball Park, a new public library (under construction), Civic Center, and National City Boulevard. The implementation program of the Specific Plan will be the vehicle to incorporate the design guidelines and land use recommendations into reality to meet its goals and objectives. 1.4 STATUTORY AUTHORITY The Community Development Commission of the City of National City is the Lead Agency for the project, including the preparation of the Program EIR. The PEIR has been subjected to the CDC's own review and analysis and reflects the independent judgment of CDC. An Initial Study was prepared for the Specific Plan pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15063. A Notice of Preparation (NOP) and the Initial Study were mailed to various Responsible and Trustee Agencies, the County of San Diego County Clerk, and interested persons for a 30-day review National City Downtown Specific Plan, March, 2004, page III-9. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 2 that began January 26, 2004 and ended February 24, 2004. The Initial Study and Notice of Preparation are included as Appendix A of the PEIR. Letters received by the public agencies that responded to the Notice of Preparation are included as Appendix B of the PER. 1.5 ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED The environmental issues addressed in the PEIR have been determined based on the completion of the Initial Study and correspondence with public agencies, organizations, and individuals through the Notice of Preparation and Initial Study review and comment process. The issues addressed in the PEIR include the evaluation of potential environmental impacts on: Aesthetics; Air Quality; Cultural Resources; Geology/Soils; Drainage/Water Quality; Traffic and Circulation; Public Services/Utilities; Land Use; Hazards and Hazardous Materials; Population and Housing; Recreation; and Noise. In addition, the PEIR addresses all other sections required by CEQA. 1.6 INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE As permitted by Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines, this PER references several technical studies, analyses, and reports. Information from the documents, which has been incorporated by reference in this PEIR is identified accordingly. In accordance with Section 15150(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, the location where the public may obtain and review the referenced documents and other sources used in the preparation of the PEIR is identified. The National City General Plan was adopted September 10, 1996 by Resolution No. 96-145. Throughout the PEIR reference will be made to the General Plan. For purposes of clarification, the reference is to the adopted City of National City General Plan and is incorporated by reference. A copy of the National City General Plan is available at the National City Planning Department located at 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California 91950. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 3 This page intentionally left blank 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2.1 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL SUMMARY The purpose of the Executive Summary is to provide the reader with a summary of the potential environmental project impacts and suggested mitigation measures, if any, that may be associated with adoption and implementation of the proposed National City Downtown Specific Plan. For a complete discussion, it is suggested the reader refer to the text of the PEIR, which addresses potential project impacts, issues and proposed mitigation measures in more detail. The summary of the potential project impacts and recommended mitigation measures as discussed in the PEIR is presented below. Project Summary 2.1.1 LAND USE/ PLANNING Project Impacts The Downtown Specific Plan conforms to all of the policies of the General Plan in terms of promoting sensible infill development and transitioning between residential and commercial uses. The Specific Plan does not conflict with any land use policies of the General Plan. The Specific Plan proposes to change the existing land uses and increase the number of residential units allowed in the Project Area and decrease the amount of commercial and light industrial land use. The adoption of the Specific Plan will require an amendment to the City's General Plan and zoning code. The Project Area is located in a redevelopment area and CDC has the authority to use eminent domain to acquire non-residential property in specific areas. The use of redevelopment funds to assist in the acquisition of properties, assemble parcels, construct infrastructure improvements, etc. will have a positive land use impact towards implementing the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan will encourage new development and remove blight by demolishing buildings, constructing new buildings, upgrading existing buildings to meet current building and fire codes, etc., which will have positive land use effects for the community as a whole. The Specific Plan will have positive impacts by encouraging the private community, City, and CDC to upgrade and improve the physical appearance of the Project Area. The adoption of the Specific Plan will not have any significant direct land use impacts based on the land use threshold criteria. The City will evaluate all future private and public projects for potential land use impacts at the time development plans are submitted for approval for compliance with the Specific Plan. Mitigation Measures There will be no significant land use impacts with the adoption and implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required by CEQA. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 4 Significance After Mitigation No significant land use impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. 2.1.2 GEOLOGY/SOILS Project Impacts As with any projects in National City, future development will be exposed to geologic hazards and seismic activity due to active faults that affect National City, including the Project Area. Seismic hardware and construction in compliance with the building code can mitigate impacts due to seismic activity. The incorporation of erosion control measures into future projects will minimize soil erosion impacts. Earthquake induced ground failure such as liquefaction and differential settlement will not impact development in the Project Area. National City follows state regulations and has programs to protect property and residents from geologic hazards. Implementation of these programs relative to the geologic and seismic constraints of development will reduce impacts to a level of insignificance. Since specific development plans for future private as well as public improvement projects are not available at this time it is speculative to identify with any accuracy the direct and indirect soils and geologic impacts that may occur with their construction. The City will determine if additional environmental analysis will be required for compliance with CEQA at the time plans for projects are submitted for approval. Additional environmental analysis to evaluate direct and indirect soil and geologic impacts will be required, if necessary. Mitigation measures will be provided accordingly to reduce significant impacts pursuant to CEQA and local/state building regulations. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce potential geologic hazard and soil erosion impacts associated with the construction of future public and private projects. 1. Prior to the issuance of a final grading permit a detailed geotechnical investigation shall be approved by the City. The investigation shall include fieldwork (e.g., subsurface exploration, sampling) and laboratory analysis as directed by the City to determine the exact location and extend of potential geologic/seismic hazards. All applicable remedial grading measures and seismic design parameters recommended by the geotechnical engineer shall be incorporated into the project and shown on the final grading plans and/or incorporated into contractor specifications prior to award of construction contracts, to the satisfaction of the City. Significance After Mitigation No significant geology/soils impacts are anticipated with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. cfi 1 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 5 11 1 2.1.3 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION Project Impacts Based on the threshold criteria the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will impact key intersections in the Project Area and require mitigation: Main Street at Yama/I-5 Southbound Off ramp (PM: LOS F); Main Street at Division Street (PM: LOS F); National City Blvd at Division Street (AM: LOS F); I-5 South Ramps at 8th Street (AM, PM: LOS F); National City Boulevard at 8th Street (AM, PM: LOS F); National City Boulevard at Plaza Boulevard (AM: LOS E); and I-5 Northbound Onramp at Civic Center Drive (AM, PM: LOS F). Specific Plan traffic will not impact Interstate 5. The proposed parking space requirements are 1.2 spaces per residential unit and 2.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor space for non-residential use. The proposed parking requirements are anticipated to be adequate to serve development allowed by the Specific Plan. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce impacts to intersections to level of service D. These improvements shall be installed prior to build -out of the Specific Plan or as warranted by the City, whichever is first. 1. Re -stripe the intersection of Main Street at Yama/I-5 southbound off ramp to include two left -turn lanes and a shared through right -turn land for the southbound approach. The improvements shall be coordinated with the City of San Diego and Caltrans. 2. A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of Main Street and Division Street. 3. A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of National City Boulevard and Division Street. 4. A traffic signal shall be installed at the intersection of 1-5 southbound off ramps and 8th Street. 5. Re -stripe the intersection of I-5 northbound on -ramp at Civic Center Drive to include a left -turn pocket for the northbound approach. 6. Provide bicycle racks when feasible to encourage the use of bicycles. 7. Promote ride -sharing programs for the businesses in the Project Area. 8. National City Transit District shall be notified in writing at Least one week prior to the start of construction of any public or private project that will impact an existing bus stop/bus shelter to allow National City Transit District adequate time to provide a temporary bus stop/bus shelter. Significance After Mitigation There will be no significant traffic and circulation impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures. -; National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 6 2.1.4 AESTHETICS Project Impacts The Specific Plan design and landscaping guidelines will significantly improve the aesthetics of 1 the Downtown Project Area. The incorporation of the recommended building designs, landscaping, pedestrian amenities to encourage foot -traffic, plaza fountain, etc. will create an improved downtown aesthetic feel. The Downtown Specific Plan should encourage the E. redevelopment of the downtown area from a mixture of old architecture and design to consistent design throughout the Project Area. The Downtown Specific Plan will have a positive aesthetic impact that may, and is anticipated, to spillover to and have a positive impact to other areas of 3 National City. Construction of hardscape and landscape improvements will significantly improve the aesthetics of the Project Area. All projects, including remodeling of existing buildings as well as new construction, will be reviewed by the City for consistency with the design guidelines of the Specific Plan during the project approval process. Compliance of projects with all applicable design requirements will ensure that development in the Project Area meets the design objectives of the Specific Plan. Mitigation Measures L 1. There will be no significant aesthetic impacts with the adoption and implementation of 11 the Downtown Specific Plan. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required by CEQA. Significance After Mitigation No significant aesthetic impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. 2.1.5 NOISE Project Impacts The development of both public and private projects could increase noise levels in the project vicinity that exceed City adopted noise levels. The development of future projects could increase both short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) noise levels beyond City standards. The increased noise levels could impact noise sensitive land uses (residential). Potential noise impacts could include both interior and exterior noise levels impacts as well as increasing the ambient, or background noise levels beyond City acceptable limits. Because specific development plans of future projects are not available at this time it is speculative to determine project specific noise impacts, including short or Long-term impacts. The City will review all future projects for potential noise impacts at the time plans are submitted for approval. When applicable, noise studies will be required to determine whether or not a project will have noise impacts as determined by the City's Noise Control Ordinance. Mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts will be imposed on projects when applicable to meet the noise ordinance National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 7 11 L 11 1 1 L and reduce noise impacts to a level of insignificance to comply with CEQA. Based on the threshold criteria the Specific Plan could have significant noise impacts due to future development in the Project Area. Mitigation Measures Upon evaluation of specific projects by the City, if potential significant noise impacts are anticipated the following measure shall be implemented where appropriate: Temporary Impacts 1. To ensure that construction activities comply with the City's Noise Ordinance a Construction Noise Abatement Plan shall be prepared for each construction project and submitted to the City prior to the issuance of demolition, grading or building permits, whichever is issued first. The Plan shall describe the construction activities, equipment required for those activities, and noise level generation characteristics of the equipment to be used. Noise levels at the closest residential use shall be predicted. If projected noise levels will exceed the Noise Ordinance limits, measures to reduce those levels to comply with the Noise Ordinance shall be described and implemented. Long Term Off -Site Impacts The analysis shows that the project will result in a significant traffic noise impact to residences along Civic Center between Wilson Avenue and Roosevelt Avenue. Further, the project will substantially contribute to significant cumulative traffic noise impacts along D Avenue between 8`h Street and Plaza Boulevard, and Plaza Boulevard between Hoover Avenue and D Avenue. Typically sound walls are prescribed to mitigate these impacts. However, in this case, most of the impacted residences front the roadway causing the traffic noise. Building barriers in front of homes is not practical or consistent with the aesthetics and design of the specific plan. Openings would be required to allow access to the streets, which would short-circuit the effectiveness of the noise barriers. The tires interacting with the roadway generate much of the noise generated by traffic. A freshly paved roadway will generally generate substantially lower noise levels than an older worn roadway. However, the reduction in noise levels erodes rather quickly as the new surface is worn. Typically the reduction is completely eliminated within a year. In recent years "low noise" roadway surfaces have been used with success more and more. These surfaces result in lower traffic noise levels than typical roadway surfaces. The question that has lingered is how long the noise reduction qualities exist. Several long-term tests are currently ongoing and indicate that the noise reduction does in fact last over time. The two surfaces most commonly used for their noise reducing qualities are open -graded friction courses (OGFC) and rubberized asphalt. Studies have shown that these surfaces can reduce traffic noise levels by 5 to 10 dB at highway speeds. At lower speeds, the reductions are estimated to be in the 3 to 5 dB range. Use of one of these surfaces on the roadways causing the National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 8 impacts would almost completely eliminate the projected noise level increases due to the project as well as the cumulative increases. To mitigate the significant noise impact caused by increased traffic generated by the project, the following roadway segments should be repaved using OGFC, rubberized asphalt or other roadway surface showing documented long term noise reductions of at least 3 dB; Civic Center between Wilson Avenue and Roosevelt Avenue, D Avenue between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard, and Plaza Boulevard between Hoover Avenue and D Avenue. In order to reduce vehicular road noise the following mitigation measure is recommended: 2. These roads (Civic Center between Wilson Avenue and Roosevelt Avenue, D Avenue between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard, and Plaza Boulevard between Hoover Avenue and D Avenue) shall be repaved with the noise reducing surfaces prior to issuance of building permits for the specific project that will result in, cumulatively, more than half of the projected increase in trips resulting from the implementation of the specific plan. Long Term Impacts from On -Site Activities The following long-term noise mitigation measure is recommended: 3. As specific commercial projects are submitted for approval they shall be evaluated for noise generating characteristics, the closeness to any residential uses, and the potential for violations of the City's Noise Ordinance. If City staff determines that a proposed commercial project has the potential to violate the City's Noise Ordinance, a detailed noise assessment shall be required. This assessment shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer and describe the noise generating activities and their characteristics as a noise source. Noise levels shall be predicted at the potentially impacted residences and compared with the Noise Ordinance standards. If an exceedance is found, project specific mitigation measures shall be described to reduce the noise levels to below the Noise Ordinance Standards. The noise report shall be submitted to and approved by the City and all mitigation measure incorporated into the building plans prior to issuance of building permits for the proj ect. Long Term On -Site Impacts The noise analysis presents evidence that the residential uses along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, and Plaza Boulevard would be exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. Further, indoor noise levels along these roadways and Roosevelt Avenue could be exposed to interior noise levels in excess of 45 CNEL unless properly designed. The noise mitigation measures recommended below will allow development to meet the indoor and outdoor noise level limits of the city. Outdoor Noise Mitigation 3. Mitigation through the design and construction of a noise barrier (wall, berm, or combination wall/berm) is the most efficient method of reducing outdoor noise exposure levels. The effect of a noise barrier is critically dependent on the geometry 11 11 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 9 1 1 between the noise source and the receiver. A noise barrier effect occurs when the barrier breaks the "line of sight" between the source and receiver. The greater the distance the sound must travel around the barrier to reach the receiver, the greater the noise reduction of the barrier. To be effective noise barriers are required to have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot with no openings or cracks. It may be a solid wall, an earthen berm, or a combination of the two. The wall may be constructed of wood studs with stucco exterior, 1/4-inch plate glass, 5/8 inch Plexiglas, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. Wood and other materials may be acceptable if properly designed as a noise barrier. For patios and balconies the barriers must run along the entire edge of the patio or balcony from building face to building face. Based on the projected traffic noise levels, no residential area would require a barrier with a height greater than 9 feet to reduce noise levels to below 65 CNEL. Typically 5 to 6 foot high barriers will adequately reduce traffic noise levels within the specific plan boundary. However, as no specific projects are proposed the specific locations of any private outdoor living areas are not known. Additionally, final grading plans are required to determine the final barrier heights and ensure compliance with the appropriate standard. The above analysis shows that this standard is achievable with feasible barrier heights. To ensure that residential projects proposed for the project. area achieve the 65 CNEL standard, City Staff shall review the preliminary designs to determine if any private outdoor living areas are potentially exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. Prior to the issuance of grading permits for any residential area with outdoor living areas potentially exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL, as determined by the City, a detailed acoustical study shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant and submitted to the City. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the area and the measures required to meet the 65 CNEL exterior residential noise standard. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the grading and building plans, as appropriate. Indoor Noise Mitigation 4. New residential uses within the project area will be exposed to noise levels no higher than 76 CNEL. This means that the building structures will need to achieve up to 31 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction. This level of noise reduction is achievable, but will likely require substantial building upgrades. Most residential uses will not be exposed to noise levels in excess of 69 CNEL, which will require up to a 24 dB outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction. In some cases standard construction will achieve this level of reduction, however, residences along major roadways may require upgraded windows to achieve the required outdoor to indoor noise reduction. With typical residential construction at least 20 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction is achieved with windows closed. With windows open outdoor -to -indoor National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 10 noise reduction falls to 12 dBA. Therefore, units requiring more than 12 dB of noise reduction require adequate ventilation per the Uniform Building Code to allow windows to remain closed. Typically this is provided through mechanical ventilation. Windows do not need to be sealed shut, but closeable at the occupants' discretion. Units along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, Plaza Boulevard, and Roosevelt Avenue will require more than 12 dB of noise reduction and mechanical ventilation. With extensive building upgrades, outdoor -to -indoor noise reductions of up to 32 dB can be achieved. All residences require 32 dB or less of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction. Therefore, the homes in the project will be able to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standards. Architectural drawings for the homes are not currently available to analyze the actual noise reduction achieved. Prior to issuance of building permits for residential units located along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, Plaza Boulevard, and Roosevelt Avenue, a detailed acoustical study shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant and submitted to the City. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the building(s) and the measures required to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the building plans. Commercial uses located within the 70 CNEL contour from the I-5 Freeway will require up to 26 dBA of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction to meet the 50 CNEL office interior noise standard. Prior to issuance of building permits for commercial projects units located within the 70 CNEL I-5 Freeway noise contour as shown in Exhibit 6, a detailed acoustical study shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant and submitted to the City. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the building(s) and the measures required to meet the 50 CNEL office and/or 55 CNEL retail interior noise standards. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the building plans. Significance After Mitigation Repaving the roadways with specialized surfaces to reduce traffic noise levels is the only practical way to eliminate the noise impacts from increased traffic generated by the project. While the repaving of the roadway segments where significant project and cumulative noise impacts are projected is expected to eliminate the traffic noise level increases experienced at the affected residences, there is some uncertainty in exactly how much noise reduction will be experienced and how long that reduction will exist. Because of this uncertainty and the lack of other methods to mitigate the impacts, the significant project and cumulative off -site traffic noise impacts are considered unavoidable. 2.1.6 AIR QUALITY Project Impacts The adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will have both short and long-term air emission impacts and contribute to air quality in the San Diego Air Basin. Based on air quality 11 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 11 modeling conducted for build -out of the Specific Plan it is not anticipated that future development will exceed any established air quality emission thresholds. However, because specific development projects are not proposed at this time, future projects could emit emissions that exceed air quality thresholds at that time. The City will evaluate all projects for potential air quality impacts at the time plans are submitted for approval. Measures to reduce air emissions will be incorporated when required to reduce both short and long-term air quality impacts for compliance with air emission thresholds enforced by SDAPCD. Mitigation measures are recommended that can be incorporated into the future projects to reduce air emissions, if they could exceed adopted emission thresholds. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended for incorporation into future projects to further reduce air emissions. Short Term Construction If air quality impacts associated with construction of an approved project exceed the significance thresholds, mitigation measures identified below should be implemented as feasible to reduce emissions of the project. Mitigation measures from the SCAQMD are presented below and are recommended for projects in the SDAB, where applicable. The following measures are recommended to reduce pollutant emissions from construction activities. The construction operators shall implement these measures. Use water trucks to keep all areas where vehicles move clamp enough to prevent dust raised when traveling on the site; • Wet down the site in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; • After construction, wet inactive areas down to reduce windblown dust; • Employ street sweeping, should silt be carried over to adjacent public roadways; • Wash off trucks leaving the site; • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering on portions of the site that will not be disturbed for lengthy periods (such as two months or more); • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned; and • Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less. Long Term The most significant reductions in regional and local air pollutant emissions are attainable through programs, which reduce the vehicular travel associated with the project. Support and compliance with the RAQS for the basin is the most important measure to achieve this goal. The RAQS includes improvement of mass transit facilities and implementation of vehicular usage reduction programs. Additionally, energy conservation measures are included. None of these recommended mitigation measures are strictly required. However, all relevant measures should be applied to the greatest extent possible. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 12 TDM Measures • Schedule truck deliveries and pickups for commercial uses during off-peak hours when feasible. This will alleviate traffic congestion, therefore, emissions during the peak hour. • Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle idling at curbsides. Presumably, this measure would improve traffic flow into and out of the parking lot. The air quality benefits are incalculable because more specific data is required. • Provide dedicated turn lanes as appropriate and provide roadway improvements at heavily congested roadways. Again, the areas where this measure would be applicable are the intersections in and near the project area. Presumably, these measures would improve traffic flow. Emissions would drop as a result of the higher traffic speeds, but to an unknown extent. • Provide on -site services. Provide incentives such as on -site ATMs and other similar measures that address lifestyle needs. These measures reduce the VMT, but the air quality benefit cannot be quantified because more specific data is required. Energy Efficiency Measures and Additional Measures • Compliance with Title 24, Part 6, California's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings. All buildings must comply with Title 24, Part 6. Reducing the need to heat or cool structures by improving thermal integrity will result in a reduced expenditure of energy and a reduction in pollutant emissions. • Develop operational emissions mitigation plan. Prior to approval of each building permit for a commercial or office use, the applicant shall submit to the Director of Planning for approval, an operational emissions mitigation plan. The plan shall identify implementation procedures for each of the following emissions reduction measures. If certain measures are determined infeasible, an explanation thereof shall be provided in the operational emissions mitigation plan. o Utilize built-in energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption and emissions. o Utilize energy -efficient and automated controls for air conditioners and lighting to reduce electricity consumption and associated emissions. • Develop plans to facilitate walking and use of bicycles. Prior to approval of each tentative tract map, the Applicant shall submit to the Director of Community Development for approval, a plan showing pedestrian/bicycle trails that facilitate connections to public facilities such as schools, parks, and regional trails, as well as between residential neighborhoods. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 13 o Where possible, connect residential areas to public facilities, parks, regional trails and other residential neighborhoods with pedestrian/bicycle trails. o Where possible, connect commercial areas to adjacent residential areas via bike/walking paths. Coordinate with SDTC regarding the location of bus turnouts and bus routes within the project area. Significance After Mitigation As discussed above, specific development projects are not proposed as part of the specific plan. Because of this, it is speculative and not possible to produce reasonable estimates of construction related emissions. It is highly probable that emissions from some projects that will be developed as a result of the Specific Plan will generate construction emissions in excess of the significance thresholds. The short-term construction emissions can be reduced to some extent by the mitigation measures described above. However, it is probable that some construction emissions would still be in excess of the significance thresholds with mitigation. Therefore, short-term construction emissions associated with the project are considered unavoidable and adverse. Regional Impacts The long-term regional air quality impact due to the proposed project will be reduced to an extent with the mitigation measures described above. However, the amount of reduction cannot be quantified. The CO emissions increase due to the project would most likely remain above the significance thresholds even with incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures. Therefore, CO emission increases resulting from the project are considered unavoidable and adverse. Local Air Quality Impacts The CO emissions are projected to be in compliance with the 1-hour and 8-hour state and federal standards, therefore, the CO impacts are not considered to be significant. 2.1.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Project Impacts The Downtown Specific Plan will not directly create a significant potential public health hazard or involve the use, manufacture, or disposal of materials that will pose a hazard to people and planned populations. The adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will encourage the development of both public and private projects in the Project Area. It is speculative, however to determine if the Specific Plan could expose humans to significant health hazards if hazardous materials have been spilled. The development of sites that used hazardous materials in the past could expose the public or the environment to hazards due to the development of such sites. All properties proposed for development with spilled hazardous materials will have to comply with National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 14 all applicable local, county, state and federal laws regarding the remediation of the hazardous materials prior to development. The Specific Plan will not change the requirements to remediate contaminated properties prior to development. Assistance by the Community Development Commission to construct public or private projects will not change or alter any local, county, State or federal requirements to remove hazardous materials in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Based on the threshold criteria, the Downtown Specific Plan will encourage development of property in the Project Area. It is possible that some sites in the Project Area may be contaminated with hazardous materials and result in significant adverse hazards and hazardous material impacts to the public or the environment. Mitigation Measures The following measures are recommended to mitigate potential hazardous material impacts of development in the Project Area with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan: 1. Prior to development of any property that was formerly occupied by or adjacent to existing facilities that used or stored hazardous materials, a detailed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment shall be approved by the City of National City to evaluate the potential for soil and groundwater contamination. If warranted by the Phase 1 environmental site assessment, soil and possibly groundwater sampling shall be required. 2. Asbestos, mercury, and a lead -based paint survey of existing buildings shall be conducted prior to any renovation or demolition activities to the satisfaction of the City. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for any property where the results of the Phase I, Phase II, and/or asbestos, mercury, or lead -based paint evaluation indicates the presence of these materials or the potential for hazardous materials at levels requiring mitigation, all remedial measures identified in the studies shall be shown on the face of the grading plans and/or incorporated into contractor specifications prior to awarding the construction contract or issuance of a demolition permit, whichever is first. All remedial measures required by law shall be implemented and completed prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever is issued first. Significance After Mitigation There will be no significant hazardous waste impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 15 c 11 L c IZ i c c 2.1.8 POPULATION AND HOUSING Project Impacts The Specific Plan will allow an increase in the number of residential units that can be constructed in the Project Arca beyond the number currently allowed by the General Plan. An increase in the number of housing units that can be provided to the residents of National City will allow the City to provide a range of housing types towards meeting more of the housing needs of the community. In addition, because the Project Area is in a redevelopment project area the Community Development Commission has the legal authority to assist to provide financial assistance to upgrade, improve and provide additional residential housing, including low and moderate housing, which will be a positive impact for the community. The Specific Plan will require the City to adjust its projected housing and population projections to reflect the increase in the number of residential units. The Specific Plan will not require a displacement of a large number of people, rather it will allow construction of increased housing units to meet some of the current housing need in National City. The commercial and light industrial development proposed by the Specific Plan is less than allowed by the existing general plan, thus the project will not create a substantial demand for additional housing. Based on the threshold criteria the Specific Plan will not have a significant housing or population impact. Although the Downtown Specific Plan will increase the overall number of residential units allowed in National City, the City will adjust its housing and population projections accordingly during the upcoming Housing Element update. Mitigation Measures The Specific Plan will not have any significant housing or population impacts, therefore, no mitigation measures are required. Significance After Mitigation No significant population or housing impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. 2.1.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES Project Impacts Based on the threshold criteria, the Specific Plan will not impact any national or local historical resources. The Specific Plan does not propose to demolish or remodel any of the buildings in the Project Area that are registered as national or local historic structures. Mitigation Measures Since no significant cultural resource impacts have been identified no mitigation measures are required. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 16 Significance After Mitigation No significant impacts to cultural resources are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. 2.1.10 PUBLIC SERVICES Water Service Project Impacts The Specific Plan will encourage development that may increase the demand for potable water for drinking, fire suppression, and landscape maintenance. New development and/or redevelopment could require upgrades to the existing distribution system in order for development to have an adequate supply of water. The construction of upgrades to the existing water distribution system could have construction impacts, which will have to be specifically identified at the time water improvement plans are submitted for approval. The City, in conjunction with the Sweetwater Authority, will determine whether or not an adequate supply of water can be provided at the time development plans are submitted for approval. The Sweetwater Authority may require improvements to the existing water distribution system in order for a project to have an adequate supply of water. Projects will be required to incorporate all state mandated water conservation measures as applicable to reduce water consumption. The incorporation of state mandated as well as suggested water conservation measures will reduce water impacts to less than significant. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce water consumption impacts: 1. All water utility plans shall be approved by the Sweetwater Authority to ensure that adequate water service is provided to the development. 2. The City shall require the incorporation of all state mandated water conservation measures. The City shall also require the additional incorporation, as applicable, of water conservation measures including water efficient dishwashers, water pressure reducing valves, hot water pipe insulation, and hot water on -demand units as applicable. Significance After Mitigation No significant water distribution and supply impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures. E F H National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 17 Police Service Project Impacts The Specific Plan is anticipated to encourage development and increase the need the police protection services. Although measures can be incorporated into future projects to improve police safety, additional development will increase calls for service. An increase in service calls could impact the time it takes for police officers to respond to Priority One, Priority Two, and Priority Three calls. Additional service calls could impact the Police Department's ability to maintain desired levels of police service. Future development plans will be reviewed by the Police Department at the time they are submitted to the city for approval. The Police Department will, during their review, determine if design changes or safety hardware can be incorporated to reduce calls for service. The incorporation of the Police Department's recornmendations will reduce calls for police protection. The development of additional projects in the Project Area may require additional police protection personnel and/or equipment to meet the Departments desired response times. Based on the threshold criteria, the Specific Plan could indirectly have significant impacts on police protection services. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce police protection impacts: 1. The Police Department shall review all future development projects for police protection impacts and ensure that additional police personnel and/or equipment are provided to provide an acceptable level of police protection services deemed acceptable by the Police Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Significance After Mitigation No significant police protection impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. Fire Protection Project Impacts The Specific Plan will encourage new development and redevelopment of existing uses. Increased development will increase the need for fire protection services. Additional demand for fire protection services could impact the Fire Department by reducing the ability of fire units to respond to calls throughout the City within its desired response time of five minutes. The Fire Department maintains a comprehensive Automatic Aid Agreement for fire protection services with the surrounding cities, including the County of San Diego. This agreement was established to provide assistance for major emergency incidents. All protected jurisdictions have mutually agreed to dedicate their resources, to the extent feasible, to major incidents in the state. If a fire emergency occurs in National City that requires additional fire personnel and equipment, fire departments from surrounding jurisdictions will respond when requested. Future development National City Downtown Specific Plan Program FIR September 2004 Page 18 plans will be reviewed by the Fire Department for compliance with the fire code. Additional measures to improve fire safety and reduce service calls will also be recommended by the Fire Department. Based on the threshold criteria, the Specific Plan could have significant impacts on the Fire Department by reducing emergency response times. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended: 1. The Fire Department shall review all future development projects for fire protection impacts and ensure that additional fire personnel and/or equipment are provided to provide an acceptable level of fire protection services deemed acceptable by the National City Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits Significance After Mitigation No significant fire protection impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. School Facilities Project Impacts Based on the threshold criteria the Specific Plan could have a significant impact on public schools due to an increase in the population in the Project Area. An increase in the population could increase the number of students that will attend area schools. The payment of developer impact fees as allowed by state law prior to the issuance of building permits will mitigate the impact due to the generation of additional students that will be generated by new development, both residential and commercial. Mitigation Measures Since no significant school impacts have been identified with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan, no mitigation measures are recommended. Significance After Mitigation There will be no significant school impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan, therefore no mitigation measures are recommended. Sewage Services Project Impacts The Specific Plan proposes to increase the amount of development, which will impact the existing sewage collection system that serves the central portion of the Project Area. The sewer 1 W 1 c 1 1 c L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 19 E system that serves the central portion may have to be upgraded to serve future sewage flows if they cannot be handled by existing facilities. The construction of upgrades to the sewage collection system could have construction impacts, which will have to be specifically identified at the time sewer improvement plans are submitted for approval. If development projects require upgrades to existing sewage collection facilities the project developer will have to pay the cost to upgrade the facilities in conjunction with project construction. Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended to ensure that adequate sewage collection facilities are available to serve new development. 1. All development projects shall be reviewed by the National City Public Works Department to make sure that adequate sewer collection facilities will be available to serve the project. If the Public Works Department determines the existing sewer collection facilities are not adequate the project developer shall construct the facilities necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. Significance After Mitigation There will be no significant sewage impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. 2.1.11 Recreation Project Impacts Based on the threshold criteria, the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will not result in any significant park or recreational impacts. The City will collect a fee for each new residential unit constructed in the Project Area. The monies will be used to upgrade or provide additional recreational facilities as needed and the park fee will mitigate the impacts of the project on park and recreational resources. There are no activities associated with the Specific Plan that will reduce or eliminate existing park or recreational facilities. The Specific Plan will have positive impacts by providing additional landscaped open space and passive recreational facilities in the Project Area, including a linear trail, sitting areas, fountain, etc. Mitigation Measures Since no significant park and recreational impacts have been identified with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan, no mitigation measures are recommended. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004, Page 20 Significance After Mitigation No significant park and recreational impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. 2.2 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES The Project Alternatives presented in Section 7.0 of this document were provided as required by Section 15126.6 of the CEQA Guidelines. Alternatives to the project are provided to reduce potential significant environmental effects that may be associated with adoption and implementation of the proposed Downtown Specific Plan as well as feasible project alternatives. The project alternatives discussed in this Program EIR include the "No Project", as required by CEQA and Expanding the Project Area. Project alternatives are required to reduce potential environmental impacts associated with a proposed project. The Program EIR identified severalpotentially significant impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. However, mitigation measures are recommended accordingly to reduce the impacts to levels of insignificance in all instances. The project altematives discuss changes to the Downtown Specific Plan that could reduce potential environmental impacts. Neither of the project alternatives is preferred to the proposed Specific Plan because neither alternatives will completely eliminate project impacts and accomplish the goals of the Specific Plan. 2.3 AREAS OF CONTROVERSY/ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED CEQA requires the EIR Summary to identify areas of controversy known to the lead agency, including issues raised by public agencies, issues to be resolved including the choice among alternatives, and how to mitigate potential significant effects. A copy of the Notice of Preparation/Initial Study was mailed to all responsible, trustee and taxing agencies as required by CEQA to solicit their environmental concerns with the project. The responses received by the responsible and trustee agencies to the Notice of Preparation/Initial Study discussing their issues or concerns with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan are presented in Appendix B. Responses were received from the following public agencies during the 30-day Notice of Preparation/Initial Study review period: a. Carol Baubatz, Native American Heritage Commission b. Greg Holmes, Department of Toxic Substances Control c. Terry Roberts, Governor's Office of Planning and Research d. Mario H. Orso, Department of Transportation, District 11 This Program EIR presents as much information as possible regarding the issues raised by the public agencies listed above. Information such as the specific location of future development projects is not known at this time. Therefore, it is speculative to determine specifically the final development density, number of residential units, height of buildings, square footage of National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 21 commercial or industrial use, site access, design, etc. associated with future development of individual sites within the Project Areas pursuant to the Specific Plan. Detailed project information will be available for further analysis at the time specific projects are submitted to the City for approval. The City will determine whether or not subsequent environmental evaluation as required by CEQA will be undertaken at the time each project is submitted for approval. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 22 This page intentionally left blank t C 0 0 1 1 1 E. 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND BOUNDARIES The National City Downtown Specific Plan is located in the City of National City as shown in Figure 1, Regional Map. More specifically, the Specific Plan is located in the central downtown area of National City as shown in Figure 2, Local Vicinity Map and totals approximately 135 acres. Figure 3, USGS Topographic Map shows the topography of the Project Area, as well as the surrounding area. 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING National City is located in the southwest part of San Diego County approximately 10 miles southeast of downtown San Diego. National City is bordered by the City of San Diego on the north and east, Chula Vista on the south, and the San Diego Bay to the west. Based on information from the State of California, Department of Finance National City had an estimated population of 59,800 people in 2003.1 3.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Specific Plan provides design guidelines and land use recommendations to guide the future development of the Project Area. When there is a conflict with the underlying city zoning, the Specific Plan will be the governing document. The purpose of the Specific Plan is to help equip project applicants, decision -making bodies, funding bodies, and interested citizens with guidance on achieving and assessing the quality of urban design in redeveloping and restoring downtown areas.2 The Specific Plan is a document that will provide the City of National City a roadmap to develop the Project Area during the next 20 years. The proposed Downtown Specific Plan is shown in Figure 4, Proposed Specific Plan. 3.4 THE INTENDED USE OF THE PROGRAM EIR The intended use of the Program EIR is to evaluate the potential environmental effects associated with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. The proposed Specific Plan meets the definition of a "Project" according to the CEQA Public Resources Code 21065. The PEIR will be referenced by both the City of National City and the Community Development Commission, as appropriate, for project approvals and/or issuance of peiinits as otherwise required when applicable. The certified Program EIR will serve as the environmental document required by CEQA for the Downtown Specific Plan as well as the general plan amendment and zoning code amendment that are required as part of the specific plan adoption process. When required to comply with CEQA, the City Council or CDC, as appropriate, will prepare additional environmental documentation in conjunction with the approval of projects pursuant to the Specific Plan. If future projects comply with the development standards provided in the specific plan subsequent environmental analysis per CEQA will not be required. However, if future State of California, Department of Finance, E-1 City/County Population Estimates, with Annual Percentage Change, January 1, 2002 and 2003. Sacramento, California, May 2003. 2 National City Downtown Specific Plan, page 31. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 23 This page intentionally left blank v 1 1 Orange CoL__�____ Oceanside Carlsbad Encinitas Solana Beach Del Mar La Jolla Project Site Coronado National Cit Chula Vist Imperial Beach Riverside Co. San Diego Co. Unitea rco Source: Katz, Okitsu & Associates Figure 1 Regional Map u • Project Boundary Source: Thomas Bros. Maps., 2003 Figure 2 Local Vicinity Map NORUIr. Source: ITS Geologial Survey BLVD lJhriatian 1 0 I ,ri pie 1 _ • ■ 1yY 5 •h y y• Sch : Ken r dy Figure 3 USGS Topographic Map INTERSICII LAND uS! CAT©OORIR u6& NEa1rr Not[(}L'$b hAtI,RIEFE m x+sl thr MCP WF@ENs1r a ALSOE4I'.UL a rao +jae RESIVEHTV4. CeiWaIERVAL a u tr r;UL19tRiAt n CchatworY41Ew,{P&FMi �AcOmmenvik 0 fUllifilE 19111E sTATosi srE TIr ICW6aL I* VdO 8s1� IyreA+c as,mcr ZaCe RAAT OF'MST WE P11.~841041.0061 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN NATIONAL CITY DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN Source: Stepper Design Group Figure 4 Proposed Land Use Plan L L L projects do not comply with the specific plan development standards, subsequent environmental analysis required by CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq. additional environmental analysis may be required in conjunction with the approval of future projects that exceed the thresholds of this Program FIR. Thus, this PEIR is the first -tier EIR pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15152 for the Specific Plan and subsequent CEQA evaluation could be required for projects that are not consistent with the Specific Plan. 3.5 PROJECT OBJECTIVE The Specific Plan is designed to build upon and enhance the existing assets of the Project Area. Building upon these assets, the economic considerations for the Specific Plan are to: • Encourage private investment to complement downtown businesses and the existing neighborhood fabric. • Build on public investment in the Education Center, Chamber of Commerce, Brick Row, Kimball Park, National City Boulevard, and the Transit Station. • Create better links to Kimball Park and the Transit Station from downtown. • Enhance pedestrian environment and provide public parking in the downtown core. • Focus retail in the downtown core on 8th Street, 7th Street, and National City Boulevard between 7th and 12th • Capture potential for neighborhood, food related and specialty retail. • Encourage mixed use, residential over retail, development in the downtown core. • Encourage new infill housing development: short-term, given market constraints, focus on 2 to 5 story buildings; longer term, as market improves to support higher development costs, encourage higher density housing of 5 to 10 stories in height.3 3 National City Downtown Specific Plan, page 10. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program PIR September 2004 Page 28 This page intentionally Left blank L i b Ei v E 1 L L c L lit L 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS Introduction In an effort to provide as much environmental analysis as possible regarding the adoption and implementation of the National City Downtown Specific Plan, the specific plan will be evaluated in as much detail as possible based on the information that is readily available without being speculative in regards to development intensity, building elevations, landscaping, construction phasing, specific sites, etc. The certified Program EIR will serve as the environmental document required by CEQA for the Downtown Specific Plan as well as the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Code Amendment that are required as part of the specific plan adoption process. If future projects comply with the development standards provided in the specific plan subsequent environmental analysis per CEQA will not be required. However, if future projects do not comply with the specific plan development standards, subsequent environmental analysis required by CEQA, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. and the CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations Title 14, Chapter 3, Section 15000 et seq. additional environmental analysis may be required in conjunction with the approval of future projects. 4.1 LAND USE 4.1.1 Environmental Setting Existing Land Uses The Project Area totals approximately 135 acres and is comprised of a mixture of existing land uses including residential, light industrial, retail, public use (city hall and Kimball Park), and various types of commercial uses. Figure 5, Existing Land Use Conditions shows the existing land uses that exist in the Project Area. Surface level photographs showing a representative of the existing land uses are shown in Figures 6 through 11, Site Photographs. Figure 12, Photo Orientation Map, shows the location of the photographs. The Project Area has a variety of land uses, mixture of architecture and design and a mixture of age of buildings, creates the existing character of the downtown. National City General Plan The National City General Plan land use designations of the property in the Project Area include: General Commercial Planned Development (CG-PD); Medium Commercial (CM); Single - Family Extendible Planned Development (RS-3 PD); General Commercial (CG); Civic Institutional (IC); Civic Institutional Open Space (IC -OS); Light Manufacturing Residential (MLR). A brief discussion of each land use designation is provided below. General Commercial Planned Development (CG-PD): This category permits high intensity commercial and complementary development along major roadways and in community shopping complexes. This designation also provides for compatible residential development limited to no more than one unit per 1,250 square feet of lot area. The Planned Development (PD) overlay National City Downtown Specific Plan Program PIR September 2004 Page 29 This page intentionally left blank �3 E s 1 LEGEND • a Commma.l Sr..t Leval Structmrq Historic Brick Row and lamb.. Hou.. Motel Motintory Structure. Neighborhood Norma (&a Ben) Edooation VI.m9. DaifW(.d Parcel. Sinai. Family Rau:Wand Stradun LIaN Industrial Structure. s Community Churches S.md Structure. ■ Institutional, City end Mambo, Structure. • Existing Perking Lot Spec. and Shuotw.s ■ Comn.roi.l Bank Brand. Structures Commercial R..teuranUB.r Structure. ■ C D C Office. and Prop.rtl.. Residential MW-F.ndy Sauna.. 1J UDI]UU Ero Roma a.m aa Ltt aD:7-63 Source: National City Downtown Specific Plan Figure 5 Existing Land Use Conditions 0 0 0 c 11 Photograph 1: Looking at existing businesses along the south side of 7th Street at "B" Avenue. Photograph 2: Looking south along National City Boulevard at 1st Street at existing businesses. Source: Phil Martin and Associates Figure 6 Site Photographs u L i D c Photograph 3: Looking northeasterly at existing residences east of Roosevelt Avenue. Photograph 4: Looking south along National City Boulevard from 7th Street at an existing parking structure and Red Lion Inn. Source: Phil Martin and Associates Figure 7 Site Photographs Photograph 5: Looking westerly from 7th Street at an existing parking structure and Holiday Inn. Photograph 6: Looking southwesterly from 12th street at "D" Avenue at Kimball Park. Source: Phil Martin and Associates Figure 8 Site Photographs c E c 11 g g Photograph 7: Looking at City Hall from 12th Street. Photograph 8: Looking at commercial west along west side of National City Boulevard south of 14th Street. Source: Phil Martin and Associates Figure 9 Site Photographs c c U B 11 Photograph 9: Looking west on 9th Street and "C" Avenue at residences. NOTE: Education Village (under construction is in the background. Photograph 10: Looking east on 9th Street towards "D" Avenue at existing residences. Source: Phil Martin and Associates Figure 10 Site Photographs 0 i 12 12 12 13 11 11 12 Photograph 11: Looking at Education Village (under construction from the corner of Plaza Boulevard at Roosevelt Avenue. Photograph 12: Looking at "brick row" from Plaza Boulevard at "A" Avenue. Source: Phil Martin and Associates Figure 11 Site Photographs C=11 MEI 1 ■ MEI■ Project Boundary Source: Thomas Bros. Maps., 2003 Figure 12 Photo Orientation Map II1 T zone requires formal review of development plans by the Planning Commission and allows for imposition of additional design conditions. Medium Commercial (CM): This land use category is designated mainly along National City Boulevard, north of 16th Street and is intended for smaller scale mixed -commercial uses. The area designated for this category is characterized by small properties with high lot coverage. This designation also provides for compatible residential development limited to no more than one unit per 1,250 square feet of lot area. Single -Family Extendible Planned Development (RS-3 PD): This category, for lots which cannot be subdivided in accordance with the City's Land Use Code, permits one detached single-family dwelling for each full 5,000 square feet of lot area, subject to all appropriate development standards (equivalent to a maximum potential yield of 8.7 units per net acre). This designation also identifies areas that contain both single-family homes and several parcels built out at higher density under previous zoning. It allows the continuation of the existing mixture of housing types and encourages infill with single-family homes on vacant properties. The PD overlay zone requires formal review of development plans by the Planning Commission and allows for imposition of additional design conditions. General Commercial (CG): This land use designation allows the same land use as the CG-PD described above, however it does not have the PD overlay. Thus, projects will not be subject to additional design conditions to those required by the CG zone. Civic Institutional (IC): This land use category designates property accommodating major public facilities such as schools, parks, and municipal buildings such as the Civic Center and the Public Works Department facilities. Civic Institutional Open Space (IC -OS): This designation is the same as the Civic Institutional land use with an Open Space overlay. The Open Space overlay provides permanent open space, consistent with the underlying land use designation, which in this case is Civic Institutional. This land use category covers the civic center and Kimball Park. Light Manufacturing Residential (MLR): This land use category reflects the location of manufacturing and commercial businesses among residences; permits low intensity, high quality industrial activities, along with office and institutional development, where compatible with adjacent uses. This designation also encourages improvement and expansion of existing housing and permits new construction of single-family homes (one per lot). Minimum lot size for new subdivisions is 5,000 square feet. The Project Area is considered an urbanized area. The National City General Plan has many policies to maintain and upgrade residential neighborhoods, revitalize existing business districts and add recreational amenities for urbanized areas. Some of the General Plan policies regarding Urban Development that are applicable to the proposed specific plan include: National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 38 A. New development in National City will occur in a planned and orderly manner, will be of the highest possible quality and most appropriate to the needs of the community, and will enhance and complement surrounding areas. B. The City shall maintain its identity as a district community by promoting a high quality urban environment with stable residential neighborhoods and healthy business districts. C. The remaining vacant land in National City, as well as major underutilized areas, will receive special attention from the City and will be treated as community assets, to ensure that their eventual development provides the optimum benefit to neighboring areas and the entire City. D. The City will encourage new development and rehabilitation of existing buildings to improve the transition between adjacent single-family homes, multi -family complexes and businesses. E. Where feasible, the City will encourage the conversion or relocation of nonconforming; higher intensity uses in order to improve the quality of neighborhoods and business districts. F. The City will continue to carefully review uses which may not be compatible with adjoining neighborhoods and business districts (i.e. fast-food restaurants and others). G. New development in National City will be subject to the availability of adequate public services and facilities, and will recognize appropriate environmental considerations. H. The City will encourage private initiated redevelopment efforts in residential, commercial, and industrial areas of National City, and will utilize public redevelopment resources where necessary to stimulate and leverage private investment. I. Land, which may become accessible as a result of a public improvement effort, will be developed in a way compatible with surrounding land uses and in the best interests of the City.4 The above General Plan policies, along with other General Plan policies that guide development that are applicable, but not listed above, guide future development in National City towards meeting the goal of improving urbanization in National City. California Coastal Act and National City Local Coastal Program National City has an adopted Local Coastal Programs for the area of the city located within the coastal zone as designated by the California Coastal Act (Act) of 1976. The coastal zone of National City includes all area west of Interstate-5, and a small area east of Interstate-5 south of 4 National City General Plan, approved September 10, 1996, page 10-11. s National City Local Coastal Program, Certified by the California Coastal Commission, July 10, 1997. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 39 1 30th Street. The National City Downtown Specific Plan does not include any property in the coastal zone, thus the Specific Plan is not subject to the Local Coastal Program. Redevelopment Project Area The Project Area is located in an adopted redevelopment project area, which is governed by an adopted redevelopment plan. The CDC, as the lead agency to implement the redevelopment plan, collects tax increment from the redevelopment project area and uses tax increment revenue to assist in the redevelopment of property that is in the redevelopment project arca, including the proposed Project Area. In addition to being in a redevelopment plan, the property in the Project Area that is one block deep along both sides of National City Boulevard and one block deep along both sides of 8th Street and Civic Center Plaza is subject to eminent domain authority until June 2007. The CDC has the authority to acquire non-residential property using the authority of eminent domain for the areas along National City Boulevard and 8th Street. The Community Development Agency is currently proposing to extend the authority to use eminent domain authority for the property in a redevelopment project area until the year 2014. If adopted, the non-residential property in the project area that is subject to eminent domain authority until 2007 would be extended until the year 2014. The current project to extend the authority of the CDC to use eminent domain is a separate project and not part of the proposed Downtown Specific Plan. 4.1.2 Project Impacts The threshold criteria for determining if the National City Downtown Specific Plan will have potentially significant land use impacts includes: • Conflicts with land uses designated by the General Plan; or • Conflicts with any applicable land use plan, policy, or applicable agency regulation; National City General Plan The Downtown Specific Plan will require a General Plan Amendment to allow the changes proposed by the specific plan with regard to the planned land uses for the specific plan area. This Program EIR will serve as the CEQA required environmental document for the General Plan Amendment and Zoning Code Amendment. The proposed land use designations were shown in Figure 4, Specific Plan Map. The Specific Plan will have a land use impact because it proposes to change the existing land use designations of the General Plan to allow more residential development and less commercial/light industrial use than the current General Plan. The increase in the number of residential units allowed will concentrate more people in the downtown area to create more of an urbanized feeling. The proposed public amenities including landscape improvement, a promenade, fountain plaza, etc. will encourage pedestrian traffic and reduce the dependency of the residents on the automobile. A higher concentration of residents in the Project Area will encourage infill development for new commercial uses, which will encourage additional pedestrian activity. The proposed change in land use to more residential development along with the public improvements will encourage residents throughout National City to patronize the businesses and enjoy the open space amenities in the Project Area, which will be a positive impact for the city as a whole. The presence of street trees, open space plazas National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 40 at key street intersections, street pavers to increase pedestrian safety, and pedestrian walkways to key city amenities such as Kimball Park will significantly improve the use of the Project Area by city residents. The Specific Plan proposes approximately 890 more residential units than allowed by the general plan. The Project Area will be more intensely developed with residential use than presently allowed by the general plan creating a highly residential urbanized area. The Specific Plan will require a general plan amendment to change existing land use designations. The change in land use and density by the Specific Plan will change the make-up of the Project Area from largely commercial and light industrial use with some residential to mostly residential and reduced commercial and light industrial use. Although the Specific Plan maintains some commercial and light industrial use, the largest land use will be residential. The Specific Plan proposes to increase the intensity of residential development to concentrate more people in the downtown area to support existing and future commercial development, create some congestion to provide the feeling of an urbanized downtown, increase the use of public transportation and encourage the use of Southwestern College (Education Village). Increasing the density of residential development will concentrate more people to the downtown area and create more of the desired urbanized feeling. The Specific Plan will encourage the redevelopment of the Project Area, changing it from vacant and underutilized parcels to higher density, allowing more residential use, higher density, taller buildings, and less open space. The Specific Plan will allow buildings up to a maximum height of 90 feet in Development Zones 4, 5B, 9 and 12, whereas the current maximum height is 35 feet. The Specific Plan will also increase the allowable height of buildings in Development Zones 2, 3, and 14 from 35 feet to 75 feet. The building height for Development Zone 11 will increase from 35 to 50 feet. The building height for Development Zones 5A, 8, and 10 will remain at 36 feet. Finally, there will be no maximum building height for Development Zones 1A, 1B, 6, and 7. The building heights in these four zones will be determined by the 6:1 floor area ratio (FAR). Overall, the proposed specific plan will significantly increase the height of buildings that can be developed in the downtown. The specific plan allows the flexibility to have various building heights to accommodate the market and provide design flexibility so all of the buildings in the downtown are not the same height. Although the project will have land use impacts by changing existing general plan land use designations, the Specific Plan will have positive land use impacts by encouraging the private community to work with the City and CDC to redevelop the Project Area, reduce and eliminate blight, upgrade existing buildings to meet current building and fire codes, construct needed public infrastructure improvements, and improve the overall physical and economic viability of the Project Area. New development consistent with the Specific Plan will have positive land use impacts by encourage the redevelopment of non -conforming land uscs to be consistent with surrounding land uses, ensure new development is consistent and meets the building design outlined by the Specific Plan, refurbish buildings that don't meet building and fire codes to meet current codes, improve landscaping throughout the Project Area, and provide more public amenities to encourage people to visit and patronize the downtown. Vacant and/or underutilized E National City Downtown Specific Plan Program FIR September 2004 Page 41 lT t 12 12 c 12 2 parcels scattered throughout the Project Area will be encouraged to be developed consistent with the Specific Plan, which will help to upgrade and improve the area. Generally, the Specific Plan will encourage development in the Project Area to be compatible throughout from a land use standpoint. The Downtown Specific Plan meets all of the applicable General Plan policies for Urban Development. For instance, the Specific Plan encourages development and redevelopment in a planned and orderly manner and meets the needs of the community to complement the surrounding areas outside of the Project Area. The Specific Plan will also promote a high quality urban environment and stabilize and promote a residential neighborhood that will promote and support a healthy business district. Other aspects of the Specific Plan that meet the General Plan policies include encouraging new development and rehabilitation of existing buildings to improve the transition between single-family homes, multi -family development and commercial uses. The land uses proposed by the Specific Plan such as high -density residential use throughout the Project Area will enhance and improve the transition between residential and commercial uses. Most of the existing public services and facilities are adequate to serve the development proposed by the Specific Plan and in the case of inadequate sewer capacity, upgrades will be constructed. All of the applicable policies of the General Plan are met with the proposed land use mix, design and development standards presented in the Specific Plan. Redevelopment Project Area Because the Project Area is located in a redevelopment area, CDC can acquire non-residential property in accordance with Redevelopment Law and the Health and Safety Code for public benefit. As such, CDC can acquire non-residential property and assist in the assembly of parcels for suitable development consistent with the Specific Plan. CDC can also assist with the construction of needed public infrastructure improvements including sewer mains, traffic signals, sidewalks, landscaping, parking lots, etc. as allowed by law and as funds become available. Participation by CDC to provide needed infrastructure improvements will have a positive impact by allowing development to occur sooner than may occur without its participation. Conclusion The Downtown Specific Plan will have land use impacts because it proposes to change existing land use designations of the general plan, increase building intensities, and building heights. However, the land uses proposed by the Specific Plan conform to the policies of the General Plan in tents of promoting sensible infill development and transitioning between residential and commercial uses. The Specific Plan proposes to change the existing land uses and increase the number of residential units allowed in the Project Area and decrease the amount of commercial and light industrial land use. The Project Area is located in a redevelopment area and CDC has the authority to use eminent domain to acquire non-residential property in specific areas. The use of redevelopment funds to assist in the acquisition of properties, assemble parcels, construct infrastructure improvements, ctc. will have a positive land use impact. The Specific Plan will encourage new development and remove blight by demolishing buildings, constructing new buildings, upgrading existing buildings to meet current building and fire codes, etc., which will have positive land use effects for the community as a whole. The Specific Plan will have National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 42 positive impacts by encouraging the private community, City, and CDC to upgrade and improve the physical appearance of the Project Arca. The adoption of the Specific Plan will not have any significant direct land use impacts based on the land use threshold criteria. The City will evaluate all future private and public projects for potential land use impacts at the time development plans are submitted for approval for compliance with the Specific Plan. 4.1.3 Mitigation Measures There will be no significant land use impacts with the adoption and implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required by CEQA. 4.1.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant land use impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 43 1 c 4.2. GEOLOGY/SOILS 4.2.1 Existing Conditions Topography The topography throughout the Project Area is generally flat and varies from approximately 10 feet above sea level near Division Street at Roosevelt Street to 20 feet above sea level near Plaza Boulevard south to Kimball Park. Soils The native soil that exists throughout the Project Area as mapped by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) is Huerheuro-Urban land complex that occurs as marine terraces. Other materials known to exist includes Quaternary -age Bay Point Formation, a formation composed mainly of marine and nonmarine, poorly consolidated fossiliferous sandstone. Locally, Bay Point Formation materials widely vary in composition from fine- to coarse- grained sandstone. The Bay Point Formation generally consists of heterogeneous layers of sand, clay, and silt.6 The National City General Plan does not identify any expansive soil in the Project Area. Seismic Characteristics Based on information in the General Plan and the California Geological Survey, there are no known faults either in or in the immediate vicinity of the Project Area. However, there are faults outside the Project Area that could impact future development. The Sweetwater Fault extends through the eastern edge of National City, but is considered to be inactive. The potential for movement on the nearby active La Nacion and Rose Canyon faults could have devastating effects to National City as well as other areas of San Diego County. The region is also prone to earthquakes that could occur on more distant faults, such as the Elsinore, San Clemente, San Jacinto and San Andreas, and suitable precautions should be practiced. The General Plan does not identify any geologic conditions in the project vicinity that could impact development in the Project Area due to ground failure, including liquefaction. The depth to groundwater at Southwestern College, which is under construction, is approximately 20 feet below the surface. Based on geotechnical data prepared for the project, Southwestern College is not subject to liquefaction. Earthquake -Induced Ground Failure Secondary earthquake hazards such as landslides, liquefaction, and differential settlement are generally associated with relatively high intensities of ground shaking. Landslides, liquefaction and differential settlement are also associated with shallow groundwater conditions, and loose, 6 Master Workplan Final Version Education Village Redevelopment Area Community Development Commission of the City of National City, July 25, 2002, page 51. City of National City General Plan, approved September 10, 1996, page 18. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 44 sandy soils. Liquefaction and its related effects pose one of the greatest dangers during a future large rnagnitude earthquake. These types of ground failure are discussed in detail below. Landslides A landslide is the movement of earth materials down a hillside or steep slope area. Landslide problems usually occur when a hillside is over steepened, the support at the base is moved, additional material or fill is loaded onto the hillside or water saturates into the slide mass. Landslide problems and other ground failures occur during earthquakes, triggered by the strain induced in soil and rock by the ground shaking vibrations and during non -earthquake conditions, most frequently during the rainy season. Liquefaction This form of ground failure usually accompanies earthquakes in loose, saturated sand soils. Liquefaction can only occur if the three following factors are present: (1) shallow water table; (2) loose sand, or silt; and (3) some form of seismic activity. When these conditions are preset vibration causes the soil to compact. If the vibration is strong enough and long enough in duration, the load of over -lying soil and buildings is transferred from the soil grains to the water between the grains. There are no known areas in the Project Area subject to liquefaction. Differential Settlement This type of ground failure is most often associated with earthquake activity in areas consisting of loose to medium dense granular soils, which compact as a result of settlement due to earthquake activity and are subject to vibration. If the amount of settlement is uniform in any given structure, the amount of damage could be negligible. Due to heterogeneous soil -density conditions, and the fluctuation in the frequency of vibration, considerable structural damage often results. Settlement can occur in all granular soils, and may be triggered by other earthquake induced ground failures. In such areas, damage is much more severe than that caused simply by compaction. The Project Area does not contain any soils that are known to be subject to differential settlement. Seiches and Tsunamis Seiches, or the oscillations of inland bodies of water could, in the event of a major seismic shock occur in the San Diego Bay. These seiches could destroy marinas, wharves, and littoral buildings, dikes and earthworks. Due to the location of the Continental Shelf in the San Diego Region, there is only a remote possibility that land and structures in National City will suffer appreciable damage from seismically induced tsunamis. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 45 4.2.2 Project Impacts The threshold criteria for determining significant impact on geology/soils are based on whether or not the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will: • Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, seismic -related ground failure, or landslides. • Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil; or • Be located on expansive soils or on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that will become unstable as a result of the project. Topography The Specific Plan is anticipated to encourage private development and the construction of public improvements to adequately serve new development. Private development will, in all likelihood result in some change to the existing topography when sites are graded for building pads, parking lots, etc. Because site -specific development plans are not available at this time, it is speculative to evaluate potential impacts due to a change in topography that may be required for a specific project. The potential impacts due to a change in topography will be evaluated at the time individual projects are submitted to the city for approval. Because the Project Area is generally flat with minimal changes in elevation, it is not anticipated that future development will result in significant topography impacts such as large quantities of grading, landslide potential, require large retaining walls, or other construction methods to mitigate topography impacts. However, if in the future a project proposes large quantities of grading that significantly changes the existing topography the city will require measures accordingly to reduce impacts that may be associated with any significant topography change. Soils The lack of information about the nature and extent of future development or redevelopment activities that may occur on a specific parcel in the Project Area precludes the identification of specific soil impacts. However, existing information about the subsurface soils in the Project Area appears to confirm that the soils are adequate to support the construction of the type of projects allowed by the Specific Plan. There are no unusual soil or geologic conditions that are anticipated to prevent or significantly impact future development. Soils and geotechnical reports will have to be approved for all projects prior to the issuance of grading or building permits. Soils and geotechnical reports will identify the types of soil on the site, determine if the soil can safely support the development proposed and list measures that must be incorporated to provide soil that is suitable for development, when required. Based on existing soils information the soil in the Project Area has the ability to support development without any significant soil impacts. Seismic Characteristics There are no active faults in the Project Area, however there are faults in the region that could cause ground shaking. The exposure of people and buildings due to ground shaking will not be National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 46 any greater with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan than presently exist. The building plans for future development projects, including new construction and remodels, must be approved by the National City Building Department before building permits are issued. As part of the building permit process the City will require the incorporation of all applicable earthquake construction measures and hardware required by the Uniform Building Code and the City to protect people and structures from ground -shaking impacts. The incorporation of all applicable earthquake and seismic hardware will minimize seismic impacts to less than significant levels. Earthquake -Induced Ground Failure Landslides There is no property in the Project Area with a significant difference in elevation that will be subject to landslides. Thus, future development in the Project Area will have a low risk of landslides and no significant landslide impacts are anticipated. Liquefaction Future development is not anticipated to be exposed to ground failure due to liquefaction because there are no known liquefaction areas in the Project Area. Because liquefaction is not known to occur, it is anticipated that future development will not be impacted by liquefaction, or any other seismic -related ground failure. Differential Settlement Differential settlement could impact buildings in areas that consist of loose to medium dense granular soils that compact and are subject to vibration. Upon submittal of a project geotechnical report the City will require the incorporation of measures to stabilize any identified soil differential settlement. Standard accepted grading procedures and engineering techniques will be incorporated into projects to mitigate differential settlement impacts to less than significant. Seiches and Tsunamis There is a possibility the Project Area closest to the ocean could suffer damage from a seismically induced tsunamis. However, due to the distance the Continental Shelf is from the city the possibility is remote. Therefore, the Project Area is not anticipated to be significantly impacted by a tsunami. Additionally, there are no bodies of water that will impact development in the Specific Plan area due to a seiche. Soil Erosion Soil erosion from wind and water could have an impact during the construction of both private and public improvement projects. The effects of wind and water erosion typically include the generation of dust due to wind and soil erosion and siltation from the effects of rainfall. Depending upon the project, length of construction and the measures that are incorporated, the 8 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program F,TR September 2004 Page 47 !t L E soil erosion impacts could be significant. The City requires the installation of erosion protection measures with all projects from the start of construction throughout the life of the project, as applicable, to reduce soil erosion impacts. The installation and maintenance of all applicable soil erosion control measures recommended by the city into future projects will reduce soil erosion impacts to less than significant. Conclusion As with any projects in National City, future development will be exposed to geologic hazards and seismic activity due to active faults that affect National City, including the Project Area. Seismic hardware and construction in compliance with the building code can mitigate impacts due to seismic activity. The incorporation of erosion control measures into future projects will minimize soil erosion impacts. Earthquake induced ground failure such as liquefaction and differential settlement will not impact development in the Project Area. National City follows state regulations and has programs to protect property and residents from geologic hazards. Implementation of these programs relative to the geologic and seismic constraints of development will reduce impacts to a level of insignificance. Since specific development plans for future private as well as public improvement projects are not available at this time it is speculative to identify with any accuracy the direct and indirect soils and geologic impacts that may occur with their construction. The City will determine if additional environmental analysis will be required for compliance with CEQA at the time plans for projects are submitted for approval. Additional environmental analysis to evaluate direct and indirect soil and geologic impacts will be required, if necessary. Mitigation measures will be provided accordingly to reduce significant impacts pursuant to CEQA and local/state building regulations. 4.2.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce potential geologic hazard and soil erosion impacts associated with the construction of future public and private projects. 1. A geotechnical investigation shall be approved by the City prior to the issuance of a grading permit for any development project that requires grading. The geotechnical investigation shall include fieldwork (e.g., subsurface exploration, sampling) and laboratory analysis as directed by the City to determine the exact location and extend of potential geologic/seismic hazards. All applicable remedial grading measures and seismic design parameters recommended by the geotechnical engineer shall be incorporated into the project and shown on the final grading plans and/or incorporated into contractor specifications prior to award of construction contracts, to the satisfaction of the City. 4.2.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant geology/soils impacts are anticipated with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 48 4.3 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION 4.3.1 Existing Conditions A traffic report was prepared by Katz, Okitsu & Associates. A summary of the traffic report is provided below and the complete traffic analysis is included as Appendix C of the PEIR. The traffic report was prepared to identify the existing traffic and parking facilities that serve the Project Area and evaluate the potential traffic and circulation impacts that could occur to the transportation system with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. The Specific Plan requires the preparation of a traffic study to meet the requirements of the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) 1996 Congestion Management Program (CMP). A CMP is required by state law for all urbanized counties in California to conduct traffic impact analyses for any development that may cause the highway system to decline to unacceptable traffic conditions. A CMP requires a traffic analysis for all large-scale projects that generate at least 2,400 daily trips or 200 or more peak hour trips. Intersections must be studied if a project adds 50 or more peak hour trips in one direction to a Regionally Significant Arterial (RSA) or more than 50 peak hour trips in one direction to a freeway. If this threshold is met, all intersections on the RSA network where peak hour traffic volume increases exceed 50 vehicles must be analyzed. The Specific Plan meets the peak hour trip generation threshold; therefore a detailed RSA analysis is required. Arterial Peak Hour Level of Service National City Boulevard and Plaza Boulevard are designated as Congestion Management Program Regionally Significant Arterials (RSAs). The CMP requires that RSAs be analyzed per the Highway Capacity Manual methodology for analyzing peak hour arterial operations. Intersection Capacity Analysis The analysis of peak hour intersection performance was conducted using the Traffix analysis software program, which uses the "operational analysis" procedure for signalized intersections as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Freeway Mainline Analysis The current and future operations on Interstate 5 in the vicinity of the Project Area were assessed based on the recommended procedure described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. SANDAG provided future daily traffic, peak hour volumes, and directional data. Traffic Count Data Existing average daily traffic data was obtained from counts taken by Traffic Data Service Southwest in November 2003 and January 2004. Supplemental traffic data was obtained from SANDAG counts published online. L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 49 Forecast Volumes Average daily traffic volumes for the build out year (2030) were obtained from the Series 10 Cities/County Travel Demand Model prepared by SANDAG. According to the SANDAG traffic model, volumes decrease slightly by the year 2030. Therefore, a 5% growth rate is used to determine more realistic future traffic volumes. Roadways The streets and highways that are either within or serve the Project Area include Interstate 5, Main Street, Roosevelt Avenue, National City Boulevard, D Avenue, Highland Avenue, Division Street, 8th Street, Plaza, Civic Center Drive, and 16th Street. A brief description of each roadway is provided below. Interstate 5 interstate 5 is an eight -lane freeway that runs north -south west of the Project Area. The interchange of Interstate 5 and Main Street provides full access to the Project Area from the north. The interchange of Interstate 5 and Civic Center Drive provides full access from the south. Main Street Main Street is currently a four -lane secondary arterial and parking is permitted along both sides. It has a raised median with curb, gutter and sidewalks. The posted speed limit is 35 mph and there are no marked bike lanes. Roosevelt Avenue Roosevelt Avenue is a two-lane local collector. Parking is permitted along both sides and it has curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements with a posted speed limit of 30 mph. Marked bike lanes are not provided. National City Boulevard National City Boulevard is a four -lane secondary arterial with parking along both sides. It has curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements and the posted speed limit is 35 mph. Marked bike lanes are not provided. D Avenue D Avenue is a two-lane local collector with parking along both sides. It has curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements; the posted speed limit is 25 mph with no marked bike lanes. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 50 Highland Avenue Highland Avenue is a four -lane secondary arterial. Parking is not permitted along either side of the street. it has curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements and the posted speed limit is 35 mph. There are no marked bike lanes. Division Street Division Street is a two-lane collector with a two-way left -turn -lane between Main Street and D Avenue. Parking is permitted and it has curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. The posted speed limit is 30 mph and there are no marked bike lanes. 8!h Street 8th Street is a four -lane secondary arterial with a two-way left -turn -lane. Parking is permitted and it has curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. The posted speed limit is 35 mph and there are no marked bike lanes. Plaza Boulevard Plaza Boulevard is a two-lane collector with a two-way left -turn -lane west of National City Boulevard and a four -lane secondary arterial without a two-way left -turn -lane east of National City Boulevard. Parking is permitted and there are curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. The posted speed limit is 35 mph and there are no marked bike lanes. Civic Center Drive Civic Center Drive is a two-lane local collector. Parking is permitted and there are curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements. The speed limit is 30 mph and there are no marked bike lanes. 16`h Street 16th Street is a two-lane local collector with parking. It has curb, gutter and sidewalk improvements and the speed limit is 35 mph. Marked bike lanes are not provided. Daily Roadway Segment Operations The SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) for the San Diego Region (draft March 30, 1999) contains daily traffic volume standards for roadways within its jurisdiction. Level of service A-D is considered acceptable for urbanized areas where further improvement in level of service is not feasible or practical. Table 1, Existing Daily Roadway Segment Conditions summarizes the results of the existing levels of service of the key roadways in the Project Area. As shown, all roadway segments currently operate at LOS D or better. B L 1 r National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 51 Table 1 Existing Daily Roadway Segment Conditions Classification/ Roadway Segment Lanes Main Street I-5 Ramp to Division/Roosevelt Roosevelt to National City Blvd Roosevelt Avenue Division to 8th 8th to Plaza Plaza to Civic Ctr. Civic Ctr. to 18th National City Boulevard Division to 1st/ Main 1st to 4th 4th to 8th 8th to Plaza Plaza to 12th 12th to Civic Center Dr Civic Center Dr to 16th 16t to 18'h 18'h to 24th D Avenue 8th to Plaza Plaza to 16th Highland Avenue Division to 4`h 4th to 8`h 8th to Plaza Plaza to 16th 16th to 18'h 18`h to 24`h Division Street Main/Roosevelt to National City Blvd National City Blvd to View Av View Ave to Highland 8`h Street I-5 S Ramp to Roosevelt Roosevelt to National City Blvd National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave Plaza Blvd Hoover to Roosevelt National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave Civic Center Drive Wilson Ave to Roosevelt Ave Roosevelt Ave to National City Blvd 16h' Street National City Blvd to D Ave 2/ Local D Ave to Highland Ave 2/ Local 18th Street LOS E Capacity 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 2/ Local 8,000 2/ Local 8,000 2/ Local 8,000 2/Local 8,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 2/ Local 8,000 2/ Local 8,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 2/ Collector 15,000 2/ Collector 15,000 2/ Collector 15,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 2/ Collector 15,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 4/ Arterial 30,000 2/ Local 8,000 2/ Local 8,000 8,000 8,000 Average. Daily Traffic (ADT) 12,100 11,903 4,600 4,200 4,200 3,300 6,500 16,668 20,085 20,482 14,800 14,100 14,100 17,400 18,700 5,200 4,900 12,000 10,000 18,300 19,200 17,400 18,700 5,163 10,281 12,101 17,700 20,200 22,248 15,611 8,500 10,349 11,332 6,000 3,200 4,700 5,700 Volume to Capacity Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.58 0.53 0.53 0.41 0.22 0.56 0.67 0.68 0.49 0.47 0.47 0.58 0.62 0.65 0.61 0.40 0.33 0.61 0.64 0.58 0.62 0.34 0.69 0.81 0.59 0.67 0.74 0.52 0.57 0.34 0.38 0.57 0.36 0.51 0.38 Level of Service A B C C C B A C D D C C C C C D C C B C C C B D D C D D C C B B D B National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 52 Roadway Segment National City Boulevard to D Ave. D Ave. to Highland Ave. 24`h Street I-5 to Wilson Ave. Wilson Ave. to National City Blvd. National City Blvd. To D Ave. D Ave. to Highland Ave. Classification/ Lanes 2/ Local 2/ Local 4/ Arterial 4/ Arterial 4/ Arterial 4/ Arterial Peak Hour Arterial Level of Service LOS E Capacity Average. Daily Traffic (AD'I') Volume to Capacity Ratio 8,000 5,800 0.73 8,000 5,400 0.68 30,000 27,200 30,000 14,800 30,000 8,600 30,000 8,600 Level of Service D D 0.91 E 0.49 D 0.29 B 0.29 B National City Boulevard and Plaza Boulevard are designated as a Congestion Management Program Regionally Significant Arterials. The adopted CMP requires that these RSA's be analyzed per the Highway Capacity Manual methodology for analyzing peak hour arterial operations. Table 2, Existing Arterial Levels of Service shows existing AM and PM segment arterial speeds and levels of service for these facilities. Table 2 Existing Arterial Levels of Service Localim Friainp F. ianw FreellmvSpeed ArtaialSpeed ArtaialSpeed ArtaialLOS A,Ia'aILOS AM PeakHour National City Boulevard Notthbamd Soa hbound 1st Street to 4 Street 0.2 35 25.4 C 23.7 C 4th Street to 8`h Street 0.3 35 28.8 B 19.6 D 8t Street to Plaza Boulevard 0.1 35 11.9 F 19.0 D Plaza Boulevard to 121 Street 0.1 35 13.7 E 21.4 D 12`h Street to Civic Center Drive 0.1 35 15.4 E 19.0 D Civic Center Drive to 16th Street 0.2 35 26.7 C 25.0 C 16th Street to 18th Street 0.1 35 21.2 D 14.5 E 18th Street to 24th Street 0.4 35 25.3 C 26.6 C Plaza Boulevard Eastbound Wedbamd Roosevelt Avenue to National City 0.1 35 6.9 E 15.2 F, Boulevard National City Boulevard to D Avenue 0.3 35 19.2 B 17.1 D D Avenue to Highland Avenue 0.2 35 17.6 C 14.8 D .PM Peak Hour National CiI Boulevard Notthbound Southbound 1� Street to 4 Street 0.2 35 27.1 C 21.9 C 4th Street to 8th Street 0.3 35 26.4 C 17.3 D 8th Street to Plaza Boulevard 0.1 35 13.9 E 23.3 C Plaza Boulevard to 12th Street 0.1 35 13.3 E 17.8 D 12th Street to Civic Center Drive 0.1 35 15.0 E 16.9 D Civic Center Drive to 16th Street 0.2 35 27.3 C 27.8 B 16th Street to 18`h Street 0.1 35 22.9 C 10.8 F 18`h Street to 24th Street 0.4 35 30.3 B 18.7 D Plaza Boulevard Eavbound Westbound Roosevelt Avenue to National City 0.1 35 9.6 D 10.4 F Boulevard 11 1 1 1 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 53 F Location National City Boulevard to D Avenue D Avenue to Highland Avenue Peak Hour Intersection Performance Until/ neetaw speed Existing Incilspeed Ai le ial LQS Existing Atteial Speed Arterial LOS 0.3 35 19.0 B 22.1 C 0.2 35 17.5 C 21.2 D Traffic conditions are evaluated in the using the procedures outlined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), a publication of the Transportation Research Board. Level of service A-D is considered acceptable for peak hour intersection operations in the City of National City. Table 3, Existing Peak Hour Intersection Conditions summarizes the existing peak hour operating conditions for the study intersections. Table 3 Existin • Peak Hour Intersection Conditions AM Peak Hour Intersection Main St at Yama/ I-5 Southbound Off Main St at Division St* National City Blvd at Division St* National City Blvd at Roosevelt* National City Blvd at 1st St National City Blvd at 4`s St Roosevelt Ave at 7`h St* I-5 Northbound Ramps at 8`h St* 1-5 Southbound Ramps at 8a' St Roosevelt Ave at 8th St National City Blvd at 8a' St A Ave at 8`s St DAve at8thSt Highland Ave 8a' St National City Blvd at 9th St* Hoover Ave at Plaza Blvd Roosevelt at Plaza Blvd National City Blvd at Plaza Blvd A Ave at Plaza Blvd* D Ave at Plaza Blvd Highland Ave at Plaza Blvd National City Blvd at 12'h St I-5 Southbound Ramps/Harbor Dr at 18.2 Civic Center Dr I-5 Northbound Ramps at Civic Center 52.2 F 55.8 F Dr* Roosevelt Ave at Civic Center Dr* 10.5 B 10.6 B National City Blvd at Civic Center Dr 4.0 A 5.9 A National City Blvd at 16'h St 6.7 A 4.4 A D Ave at 16th St 7.2 A 9.5 A Highland Ave at 16`h St 7.4 A 9.6 A PM Peak Hour Average Intersection Delay (sec.) 28.3 4.5 202.6 15.0 4.0 6.0 12.7 9.7 25.7 14.5 25.9 26.3 7.9 16.2 45.6 11.8 8.1 18.5 9.4 18.0 16.6 8.7 Level of Service C A F B A A B A D B C D A B E B A B A B B A B Average Intersection Delay (sec.) 61.1 4.9 57.7 57.0 1.9 9.5 10.8 15.1 254.9 14.3 27.2 61.9 10.6 19.1 37.6 16.7 12.9 12.5 12.2 15.9 22.6 9.3 20.2 Level of Service E A F F A A B C F B C F B B E C B B B B B A C National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 54 Intersection Highland Ave at Division St Highland Ave at 4th St Highland Ave at 18th St Highland Ave at 21st St Highland Ave at 24th St National City Blvd at 18th St National City Blvd at 24th St Hoover Ave at 24th St Wilson Ave at 24th St I-5 NB On/Off ramp at 24th St I SB On/Off ra • at 24th St *Unsignalized intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Average Intersection Delay (sec.) 19.5 6.0 9.1 1.8 6.6 15.4 22.2 13.1 16.4 11.1 10.9 Average Level of Intersection Service Delay (sec.) B 25.9 A 8.4 A 9.3 A 2.5 A 7.8 B 21.0 C 36.3 B 17.9 B 11.4 B 7.2 B 70.0 Level of Service C A A A A C D B B A E As shown, all study intersections operate at LOS D or better during the peak hours, except for the following: • Main Street at Yama/I-5 Southbound off ramp (PM: LOS E) • National City Blvd at Division Street (AM, PM: LOS F) • National City Blvd at Roosevelt (PM: LOS F) • I-5 Southbound Ramps at 8th Street (PM: LOS F) • A Avenue at 8th Street (PM: LOS F) • National City Blvd at 9th Street (AM, PM: LOS E) • I-5 Northbound onramp at Civic Center Drive (AM, PM: LOS F) Mainline Freeway Segment Conditions The current and future operations on Interstate 5 near the Project .Area were assessed based on the recommended procedure described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual. Freeway segment volumes were obtained from the most recent data collected by Caltrans. Table 4, Existing Mainline Freeway Segment Conditions summarizes the existing level of service on the freeway mainlines that serve the Project Area. Transit The National City Transit (NCT) provides public transportation in National City. NCT has a total of thirteen bus stops in the Project Area, including three bus stops along National City Boulevard (two stops and one shelter), four bus stops on Plaza Boulevard, three bus stops on 8th Street, and three bus stops on D Avenue. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 55 Table 4 Existing Mainline Freeway Segment Conditions Peak Hour/ Peak Direction nt Capacity Freeway Segme AM Peak Hour Number of Mainline Lanes Peak Hour Volume (PCE)' Volume to Capacity Ratio Level of Service Interstate 5 Northbound North of Division Ramps 4 9,200 8,514 0.93 E Division Ramps to 8th Ramps 4 9,200 7,927 0.86 D 8th Ramps to Civic Center Ramps 4 9,200 6,852 0.74 C Civic Center to 24th Ramps 4 9,200 6,958 0.76 C South of 24th Ramps 4 7,656 0.83 D PM Peak Hour Interstate 5 Southbound North of Division Ramps 4 9,200 7,951 0.86 D Division Ramps to 8th Ramps 4 9,200 8,097 0.88 D 8th Ramps to Civic Center Ramps 4 9,200 7,599 0.83 D South of Civic Center Ramps 4 9,200 8,111 0.88 D South of 24`h Ramps 4 9,200 9,326 1.01 F (0) Source: SANDAG Series 10 2005 Forecast PCE=Passenger Car Equivalent. PCE=Peak Hour Vehicles/(Peak Hour Factor* Heavy Vehicle Factor), where heavy vehicle factor of 97.66% is based on HCM Methodology. The heavy vehicle factor is derived from an assumption that volumes are composed of 4% trucks and 2% RVs and the grade is less than 2%. Truck Routes National City does not have any designated truck routes to direct trucks away from the Project Area. Bicycle Lanes National City does not have a foiinal bicycle network. There are no marked bicycle lanes on city streets. 4.3.2 Project Impact The threshold criteria for determining whether or not the Specific Plan will have significant traffic impacts is based on the following criteria. The SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) for the San Diego Region has developed a series of thresholds based on allowable increases in volume -to -capacity ratios that become more stringent as level of service worsens. The acceptable level of service for roadway segments and intersections in National City is level of service D. Where roadway segments and intersections operate at LOS D or better, findings of significant impacts may occur, but no mitigation is required. Where the roadway segment is forecast to operate at LOS E or F, and the increase in v/c is greater than 0.02 the determination of significance (Yes/No) is shown in bold type to indicate a significant project impact that requires mitigation. Where intersections are forecast to operate at LOS E or F and the increases in delay are greater than two seconds, the National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 56 determination of significance (Yes/No) is shown in bold type to indicate a significant impact that requires mitigation. For freeway segments, a significant project impact will occur if the segment operates at worse than LOS D and the project degrades volume to capacity ratio by more than 0.01. Proposed Specific Plan Improvements The following section discusses the specific physical improvements planned as part of the Specific Plan. National City Boulevard The Specific Plan proposes to improve National City Boulevard with the addition of raised, landscaped medians and pop -outs at the intersections. There will be no changes to the number of traffic lanes, so the traffic flow should not be impeded. The proposed raised medians will not negatively affect the traffic circulation patterns and will improve the aesthetics in the project area. Left turns onto and from 9th Street and llth Street will no longer be possible with construction of a raised median, but it is not likely that the traffic will be significant. All of the traffic due to the closure of the medians is diverted to intersections to the north and south and is reflected in the traffic analysis. Main Street at National City Boulevard Intersection Reconfiguration The intersection of Main Street/National City Boulevard at Division Street will be realigned to eliminate the diagonal configuration to create one three-legged intersection. The proposed alignment is shown in Figure 13, Proposed Reconfiguration of Main Street. 8`h Street 8th Street between National City Boulevard and D Avenue will be narrowed to a three -lane cross- section allowing for the existing four -lane roadway to be divided by a two-way left -turn lane. The narrowing of 8th Street is expected to divert some traffic to Plaza Boulevard. A Avenue Traffic Signals The addition of two traffic signals on A Avenue at 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard with storage pockets for east -west left turns is part of the planned improvements. Plaza Boulevard On -street parking along both sides of Plaza Boulevard from the I-5 freeway to D Avenue will be eliminated to allow for wider sidewalks. F s 1 H National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 57 [ 117 u L. Figure 13 Source: Katz, Okitsu & Associates Proposed Reconfiguration of Main Street IT C Proposed Project Traffic The Specific Plan proposes to increase the current intensity of land use in the Project Area and as a result there will be an increase in traffic. Project Trip Generation Trip generation is a measure or forecast of the number of trips that begin or end in the Project Area and is a function of the extent and type of development proposed by the Specific Plan. Table 5, Trip Generation for the Downtown Specific Plan summarizes the trips that are estimated to be generated by the Specific Plan. Table 5 Trip Generation for the Downtown Specific Plan Planned Land Use Planned Trips Land Use Intensity Units Trip Rate ADT AM Trips AM In AM Out PM Trips PM In PM Out Commercial 978 KSF 40 39,110 1,173 704 469 3,520 1,760 1,760 Office 562 KSF 20 7,866 1,101 991 110 1,101 220 881 Residential 4,007 Dwelling Units 4 16,028 1,282 256 1,026 1,603 1,122 481 Total Specific Plan 63,005 3,557 _ 1,952 1,605 r 6,224 3,102 3,122 Source: SANDAG (Not so) Brief Guide of Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region, April 2002 As shown in Table 5, the specific plan would generate approximately 63,005 daily vehicle trips to the circulation network with 3,557 trips in the AM peak hour and 6,224 in the PM peak hour. Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Trip distribution identifies the probable destinations, directions, or traffic routes that project related traffic will likely affect. SANDAG has a traffic -forecasting model that was used to determine the trip distribution for the traffic generated by the Specific Plan as required by the City of National City's CMP requirements. Build out Conditions with Project Projected average daily traffic volumes for the year 2030 from the Series 10 Cities/County Travel Demand Model prepared by SANDAG were reviewed. To these volumes, traffic associated with other planned developments in the study area was added to develop build out without project conditions and project trips were added to this base. Through a comparison of the resulting change in delay and level of service, build out project impacts can be identified, The build out with project analysis assumes that all of the proposed project improvements have been constructed. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program FIR September 2004 Page 59 Daily Roadway Segment Performance The SANTEC/ITE Guidelines for Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) for the San Diego Region (draft March 30, 1999) contains daily traffic volume standards for roadways within the City. To determine build out service levels on Project Area roadway segments, a comparison was made of the adopted average daily traffic thresholds for level of service, the daily capacity of the Project Area roadway segments, and the roadway segment data taken from the model described above. Table 6, Buildout Daily Roadway Segment Conditions summarizes the build out conditions by the Specific Plan compared to the National City General Plan. As shown, the study area roadway segments will operate at levels of service ranging from LOS B to LOS F based on traffic generated by the specific plan. Significant traffic impacts will occur on the following segments: • Main Street from I-5 South Off Ramp to Division Street (LOS E) • Roosevelt Avenue from o Division Street to 8th Street (LOS F) o 8th Street to Plaza (LOS F) • National City Blvd from: o 4th Street to 8th Street (LOS F) o 8th Street to Plaza (LOS E) o Plaza to 12th Street (LOS E) o 12th Street to Civic Center Dr (LOS E) o Civic Center Dr to 16th Street (LOS E) • D Avenue from o 8th to Plaza (LOS F) o Plaza to 16th Street (LOS F) • Highland Avenue from o 8th Street to Plaza (LOS E) o Plaza to 16th Street (LOS E) o 18th Street to 24th Street (LOS E) • Division Street from o Main Street to National City Blvd (LOS E) o National City Blvd to D Ave (LOS E) o D Ave to Highland Ave (LOS F) • 8th Street From National City Boulevard to D Avenue (LOS F) • Plaza Blvd from o Hoover Ave to National City Blvd (LOS F) o National City Blvd to D Ave (LOS E) • Civic Center Drive from Wilson Ave to Roosevelt Ave (LOS F) • 18th Street from D Ave to Highland Ave (LOS E) • 241h Street from Wilson Ave to National City Blvd (LOS E) a L L L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 60 771 Roadway Main Street I-5 Ramp to Division/Roosevelt 4/ Arterial 30,000 19,564 Roosevelt to National City Blvd 4/ Arterial 30,000 12,498 0.42 Roosevelt Avenue Division to 81h 8'" to Plaza Plaza to Civic Ctr. Civic Center to 18h National City Boulevard Division to 1st/ Main 4/ Arterial 30,000 7,420 0.24 A 15,046 0.50 C 0.26 No 1st to 4i° 4/ Arterial 30,000 17,501 0.58 C 19,216 0.64 C 0.06 No 4'" to 8'" 4/ Arterial 30,000 21,339 0.71 D 35,787 1.19 F 0.48 Yes Si° to Plaza 4/ Arterial 30,000 21,506 0.72 D 26,063 0.87 E 0.15 Yes Plaza to 12th 4/ Arterial 30,000 16,290 0.54 C 27,851 0.93 E 0.39 Yes 12th to Civic Center Dr 4/ Arterial 30,000 14,805 0.49 C 27,041 0.90 E 0.41 Yes Civic Center Dr to 16th 4/ Arterial 30,000 14,805 0.49 C 25,537 0.85 E 0.36 Yes 16`" to 18" 4/ Arterial 30,000 15,330 0.51 C 24,885 0.83 D 0.32 No 18'" to 24'" 4/ Arterial 30,000 15,855 0.53 C 19,861 0.66 C 0.13 No D Avenue 8' to Plaza 2/ Local 8,000 6,188 0.77 D 10,900 1.36 F 0.59 Plaza to 16' 2/ Local 8,000 12,617 1.58 • F 14,900 1.86 F 0.28 Highland Avenue Division to 4'h 4/ Arterial 30,000 12,600 0.42 C 20,290 0.68 D 0.26 No 4' to 8'h 4/ Arterial 30,000 10,500 0.35 B 18,071 0.60 C 0.25 No 8" to Plaza 4/ Arterial 30,000 19,215 0.64 C 25,845 0.86 E 0.22 Yes Plaza to 16" 4/ Arterial 30,000 20,160 0.67 D 26,993 0.90 E 0.23 Yes 16'h to 18'" 4/ Arterial 30,000 18,270 0.61 C 20,179 0.67 D 0.06 No 18" to 24' 4/ Arterial 30,000 19,635 0.65 C 28,360 0.95 E 0.30 Yes Division Street Main/Roosevelt to National City Blvd 2/ Collector 15,000 5,421 0.36 B 14,041 0.93 E 0.49 Yes National City Blvd to D Ave 2/ Collector 15,000 10,795 0.72 D 14,570 0.97 E 0.25 Yes D Ave to Highland 2/ Collector 15,000 12,706 0.85 D 16,210 1.08 F 0.23 Yes gth Street I-5 S Ramp to Roosevelt 4/ Arterial 30,000 24,567 0.82 D 42,800 1.43 F 0.61 Yes Roosevelt to National City Blvd 4/ Arterial 30,000 26,608 0.89 E 38,446 1.28 F 0.39 Yes Table 6 Buildout Daily Roadway Segment Conditions C7a�fiatiod Laces }Mika C_ooditioos Geoem1Plan Forecast ADT Volume Volume' Capacity Ratio LOS Forecast AIJI Volume Bm7dontConditions Spec&Plan Vohmte/ Capacity Ratio Sigutricant 7 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR LOSE Cry 0.65 C C 26,000 NA 0.87 NA LOS E NA Inavasein `Ic 0.22 NA Yes NA 2/ Local 8,000 5,360 0.67 D 27,388 3.42 F 2,75 Yes 2/ Local 8,000 6,740 0.84 E 23,190 2.90 F 2.06 Yes 2/ Local 8,000 4,660 0.58 C 5,958 0.74 D 0.16 No 2/ Local 8,000 3,465 0.43 B 3950 0.49 B 0.06 No Yes Yes September 2004 Page 61 u RaanlwaySegment National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave Plaza Blvd Hoover to National City Blvd National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave Civic Center Drive Wilson Ave to Roosevelt Ave Roosevelt Ave to National City Blvd 16th Street National City Blvd to D .Ave D Avenue to Highland Ave 18th Street National City Blvd to D Ave D Avenue to Highland Ave 24th Street I-5 to Wilson Ave Wilson Ave to National City Blvd National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave Clod Lanes LOSE Capacity Bm7rbtrt Conditions General Plan Btuldat Conditions Speotfic Plan Forecast ADT Volun Volume/ Cry Ratio IAS Forecast ADT Vohm e Volume/ Capacity Ratio LOS Increase in VAC Signii cant 4/ Arterial 30,000 (2/ Arterial*) (15,000*) 24,049 0.80 D 19,500 1.30 F 0.50 Yes 4/ Arterial 30,000 (2/ Arterial*) (15,000*) 16,392 0.55 C 21,359 1.42 F 0.87 Yes 2/ Collector 15,000 10,385 0.69 D 20,445 1.36 F 0.67 Yes 4/ Arterial 30,000 19,073 0.64 C 29,475 0.98 E 0.34 Yes 4/ Arterial 30,000 16,530 0.55 C 18,900 0.63 C 0.08 No 2/ Local 8,000 6,300 0.79 D 15,975 2.00 F 1.21 Yes 2/ Local 8,000 3,360 0.42 B 6,451 0.81 C 0.39 No 2/ Local 8,000 5,258 0.66 D 6,200 0.78 D 0.12 No 2/ Local 8,000 6,363 0.80 D 5,600 0.70 D -0.10 No 21 Local 8,000 6,996 0.87 E 6,600 0.83 E -0.04 No 2/ Local 8,000 5,670 0.71 D 7,420 0.93 E 0.22 Yes 4/ Arterial 30,000 33,718 1.12 F 33,500 1.12 F 0.00 No 4/Arterial 30,000 21,264 0.71 D 27,700 0.92 E 0.21 Yes 4/Arterial 30,000 9,117 0.30 B 10,000 0.33 B 0.03 No 4/ Arterial 30,000 9,066 0.30 B 9,500 0.32 B 0.01 No *Note: 8ih Street between National City Boulevard and D Avenue will be narrowed to a two-lane Collector with the project improvements. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 62 C: 11 Plaza Boulevard is anticipated to handle some increases in traffic beyond noirnal growth due to the proposed narrowing of 8`h Street. The plan also anticipates that some of the other streets and intersections in the study area also absorb a certain amount of redistributed traffic with the proj ect. Peak Hour Arterial Level of Service National City Boulevard and Plaza Boulevard are designated as a Congestion Management Program Regionally Significant Arterials. The adopted CMP requires that these RSA's be analyzed per the Highway Capacity Manual methodology for analyzing peak hour arterial operations. Table 7, Buildout Arterial Levels of Service With and Without the Specific Plan shows existing AM and PM segment arterial speeds and levels of service for these facilities. Table 7 Buildout Arterial Levels of Service - Specific Plan Location SPecificrian Length/ FreellowSpeed A,raialSpeed Arten[fin AtteridSpeed Asteiouns AM PeakHour National City Boulevard Northbound Somhboumd ls`Street to 4 Street 0.2 35 20.1 D 21.0 D 4th Street to 8th Street 0.3 35 12.6 E 14.4 E 8th Street to Plaza Boulevard 0.1 35 7.3 F 13.0 E Plaza Boulevard to 12th Street 0.1 35 2.7 F 19.8 D 12th Street to Civic Center Drive 0.1 35 6.0 F 18.7 D Civic Center Drive to 16`h Street 0.2 35 26.5 C 24.7 C 16th Street to 18th Street 0.1 35 20.5 D 13.4 E 18th to 24th Street 0.4 35 28.2 B 24.7 C Plaza Boulevard &abo nd Westbound Roosevelt Avenue to National City 0.1 35 4.3 F 21.7 C Boulevard National City Blvd to A Avenue 0.1 35 16.0 C 1.3 F A Avenue to D Avenue 0.2 35 13.7 C 24.0 C D Avenue to Highland Avenue 0.2 35 18.0 C 14.0 E PM Peak Hour National City Boulevard Northbound Sauthbormd 1st Street to 7 Street 0.2 35 18.7 D 19.2 D 4th Street to 8th Street 0.3 35 25.5 C 6.3 F 8th Street to Plaza Boulevard 0.1 35 6.7 F 19.1 D Plaza Boulevard to 12th Street 0.1 35 6.6 F 21.6 C 12th Street to Civic Center Drive 0.1 35 14.0 E 22.6 C Civic Center Drive to 16th Street 0.2 35 26.6 C 28.2 B 16th Street to 18th Street 0.1 35 26.2 C 7.4 F 18t° to 24th Street 0.4 35 25.6 C 9.5 F Plaza Boulevard Eastbound Westbound Roosevelt Avenue to National City 0.1 35 3.3 F 7.3 F Boulevard National City Boulevard to A Avenue 0.1 35 16.7 C 3.3 F A Avenue to D Avenue 0.2 35 4.2 F 26.3 C D Avenue to Highland Avenue 0.2 35 15.6 C 14.5 E National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 63 As shown in Table 7, most arterials will experience higher average delays (arterial speed would be lower). The addition of traffic due to the Specific Plan would significantly impact the following segments: • Northbound National City Boulevard from 8th Street to Civic Center Drive (AM: LOS F) • Northbound National City Boulevard from 4th Street to 8th Street (AM: LOS E) • Northbound National City Boulevard from 8th Street to 12th Street (PM: LOS F) • Northbound National City Boulevard from 12th Street Civic Center Drive (PM: LOS E) • Southbound National City Boulevard from 4th Street to Plaza (AM: LOS E) • Southbound National City Boulevard from 4th Street to Plaza and 16th Street to 18th Street (AM: LOS E) • Southbound National City Boulevard from 4th Street to 8th Street and 16th Street to 24th Street (PM: LOS F) • Eastbound Plaza Boulevard from Roosevelt Avenue to National City Boulevard (AM, PM: LOS F) • Eastbound Plaza Boulevard from A to D Avenue (PM: LOS F) • Westbound Plaza Boulevard from National City Blvd to A Avenue (AM, LOS F) • Westbound Plaza Boulevard from D Avenue to Highland Avenue (AM, PM: LOS E) • Westbound Plaza Boulevard from Roosevelt Avenue to A Avenue (PM: LOS F) Peak Hour Intersection Performance The peak hour volumes for intersections in the Project Area were analyzed using the Synchro Delay methodology for signalized intersections. Table 8, Buildout (Year 2030) Peak Hour Intersection Conditions General and Specific Plans summarizes the results of this analysis and the significance of the project's impacts. As shown the following intersections will be impacted by traffic generated by the Specific Plan as compared to the General Plan (operate worse than LOS D during peak hours): • Main Street at Yama/I-5 Southbound Off ramp (AM, PM: LOS F) • Main Street at Division Street (AM, PM: LOS F) • National City Blvd at Division Street (AM, PM: LOS F) • Roosevelt Avenue at 7th Street (AM, PM: LOS F) • Roosevelt Avenue at 8th Street (AM, PM: LOS F) • I-5 North Ramps at 8th Street (PM: LOS F) • I-5 South Ramps at 8th Street (AM, PM: LOS F) • National City Boulevard at 8th Street (AM, PM: LOS F) • Hoover Avenue at Plaza Blvd (PM: LOS F) • Roosevelt Avenue at Plaza Blvd (AM: LOS F) • Roosevelt Avenue at Civic Center Drive (PM: LOS F) • National City Boulevard at Plaza Boulevard (AM: LOS F) • D Avenue at Plaza Blvd (PM: LOS F) • I-5 Ramps/Harbor Drive at Civic Center Drive (AM, PM: LOS F) • 1-5 Northbound Onramp at Civic Center Drive (AM, PM: LOS F) • National City Blvd at 24th Street (PM: LOS F) National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 64 I Based on the adopted standards of significance, the intersections listed above would require mitigation measures to address the significant impacts of levels of service less than D. The Specific Plan focuses on developing a pedestrian -friendly and attractive downtown. Levels of service less than D are considered an acceptable concession in some locations along National City Boulevard to meet the goals of the Specific Plan. Fligh traffic congestion will cause motorists to seek alternative transportation routes, thereby spreading traffic delays over various intersections rather than concentrating delays at a few intersections. The only mitigation measure that was considered for those intersections that will operate at an unacceptable level of service was the installation of traffic signals at the intersections that are currently unsignalized (with very high delays, LOS E or greater) and phasing, signal timing and lane assignment changes to existing signalized intersections. Freeway Mainline Analysis Forecast daily and peak hour volumes on I-5 with traffic generated by the General Plan and Specific Plan are summarized in Table 9, Buildout Freeway Mainline Segment Conditions With General Plan and Specific Plan. This table shows that the freeway segments will operate at levels ranging from LOS C to LOS F under both the General Plan and Specific Plan. Traffic generated by the Specific Plan will have significant impacts to the following freeway segments: • I-5 Northbound o North of Division Street ramps (AM) o Division Street ramps to 8th Street ramps (AM) o Civic Center Drive ramps to 24th Street (AM) o South of 24th Street ramps (AM) • I-5 Southbound o North of Division Street ramps (PM) o Division Street ramps to 8th Street ramps (PM) o 8th Street ramps to Civic Center Drive ramps (PM) o Civic Center Drive ramps to 24th Street ramps (PM) o South of 24th Street ramps (PM) Parking Most of the roadways in the Project Area provide parking along both sides of the road, either with 45-degree angled parking, or parallel parking along curb frontages. The public parking throughout the Project Area is heavily used; however, parking demand does not use all of the parking capacity. The estimated on -street parking capacity is approximately 1,625 stalls. Existing off-street commercial parking in the Project Area is estimated at 800 parking stalls. There are some parking restrictions in the Project Area, the most common being timed restrictions with 2-hour limits on some roadways and restricted times for street sweeping in other areas. There are also sornc parking stalls reserved for handicapped vehicles and some roadways reserved for truck parking only. There are no parking meters in National City. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 65 Table 8 Buildout (Year 2030) Peak Hour Intersection Conditions General and Specific Plans Specific Plan Intersection AM Peak Hour General Plan Average Intersection Level of Delay (sec.) Service Average Intersection Delay (sec.) Level of Service Change Significant With Improvemen Main St at Yama/I-5 Southbound Off - ramp 82.1 E 128.5 F 46.4 Yes 102.9 F Main St at Division* 8.4 A 902.9 F 894.5 Yes 13.4 A National City Blvd/Osborne at Division* 225.2 F 298.9 F 73.7 Yes 105.1 F National City Blvd at Roosevelt* 38.4 E NA NA NA National City Blvd at 1st 5.3 A 12.2 B 6.9 No National City Blvd at 4th St 9.3 A 36.6 D 27.3 No Roosevelt Ave at 7th St* 22.2 C 168.0 F 145.8 Yes 77.3 E I-5 North Ramps at 8th St* 10.6 B 43.1 D 32.5 No I-5 South Ramps at 8th St* 231.6 F 2138.0 F 1906.4 Yes 14.7 B Roosevelt Av at 8t" St 36.2 C 116.6 F 80.4 Yes 115.1 F National City Blvd at 8th St 31.7 C 65.0 E 33.3 Yes 65.0 E A Av at 8th St* 29.9 D 3.1 A -26.8 No D Av at 8th St 10.5 B 15.7 B 5.2 No Highland Av at 8th St 21.5 C 28.2 C 6.7 No National City Blvd at 9th St* 53.2 F 17.4 C -35.8 No Hoover Av at Plaza Blvd* 14.6 B 25.7 D 11.1 No osevelt at Plaza Blvd 15.4 B 146.5 F 131.1 Yes 146.5 F ational City Blvd at Plaza Blvd 32.5 C 138.7 F 106.2 Yes 138.7 F A Av at Plaza Blvd* 10.3 B 4.6 C -5.7 No D Av at Plaza Blvd 18.8 B 29.5 C 10.7 No Highland Av at Plaza Blvd 15.1 B 17.5 B 2.4 No National City Blvd at 12th St 10.7 B 28.7 C 18.0 No I-5 Ramps/Harbor Dr at Civic Center Dr 18.9 B 67.6 E 48.7 Yes 67.6 E I-5 Northbound on at Civic Center Dr* 70.2 F 2865.6 F 2795.4 Yes 126.4 F Roosevelt Av at Civic Center Dr* 10.9 B 19.9 C 9.0 No National City Blvd at Civic Center Dr 3.5 A 6.0 A 2.5 No National City Blvd at 16th St 6.9 A 13.7 B 6.8 No D Av at 16th St 31.4 C 44.4 D 13.0 No Highland Av at 16th St 9.0 A 10.9 B 1.9 No Highland Av at Division Street 24.8 C 30.7 C 5.9 No Highland Av at 4rth Street 11.4 B 13.8 B 2.4 No Highland Av at 18t" Street 10.0 B 15.2 B 5.2 No Highland Av at 21st Street 1.9 A 3.0 A 1.1 No Highland Av at 24th Street 7.8 A 10.1 B 2.3 No National City Blvd at 18th St 16.5 B 17.3 B 0.8 No National City Blvd at 24th St 25.4 C 25.7 D 0.3 No Hoover Av at 24th St 26.3 C 20.5 C -5.8 No Wilson Av at 24th St 19.8 B 14.0 B -5.8 No 1-5 NB On/Off ramp at 24th St 23.4 B 16.8 B -6.6 No I-5 SB On/Off ram. at 24th St 14.6 B 16.9 B 2.3 No *Unsignalized intersection in general plan �3 1 3 1 1' National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 66 1 Table 9 Build Out Freeway Mainline Segment Conditions General and Specific Plans _.. _ General Plan Specific Plan Peak Number of Hour/ Peak Hour Volume to Peak Hour Volume to Mainline Peak Volume Capacity Level of Volume (PCE) Capacity Level of Increase Freeway Segment Lanes Direction (PCE)' Ratio Service ' Ratio Service in v/c Significant? AM Peak Hour Interstate 5 Northbound North of Division Ramps 5 11,500 10,831 0.94 E 11,438 0.99 E 0.05 Yes Division Ramps to 8th Ramps 5 11,500 10,381 0.9 D 10,924 0.95 E 0.05 Yes 8th Ramps to Civic Center Ramps 5 11,500 9,484 0.82 D 9,573 0.83 D 0.01 No Civic Center to 24th Ramps 11,500 10,322 0.9 D 10,532 0.92 D 0.02 Yes South of 24th Ramps 5 11,500 11,197 0.97 E 11,379 0.99 E 0.02 Yes PM Peak Hour Interstate 5 Southbound North of Division Ramps 5 11,500 9.616 0.84 C 11,613 1.01 F (0) 0.I7 Yes Division Ramps to 8th Ramps 5 11,500 9,758 0.85 D 11,931 1.04 F (0) 0.19 Yes 8th Ramps to Civic Center Ramps 5 11,500 9,305 0.81 D 10,689 0.93 E 0.12 Yes Civic Center to 24th Ramps 5 11,500 9,982 0.87 D 10,786 0.94 E 0.07 Yes South of24th Ramps 5 11,500 10,102 0.88 D 11,144 0.97 E 0.09 Yes Source: SANDAG Series 10 2030 Forecast. 1. PCE-Passenger Car Equivalent. PCE=Peak Hour Vehicles/(Peak Hour Factor*Heavy Vehicle Factor), where heavy vehicle factor of 97.66% is based on HCM Methodology. The heavy vehicle factor is derived from an assumption that volumes are composed of 4% trucks and 2% RVs and that the grade is less than 2%. The Specific Plan proposes to widen the sidewalks along Plaza Boulevard from 8 to 13 feet. This will require removal of all on -street parking along Plaza Boulevard from the I-5 freeway to D Avenue, eliminating approximately 140 parking spaces. The Specific Plan proposes to reduce the City's existing on -site parking space requirements. The proposed parking space requirements are 1.2 spaces per residential unit and 2.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor space for non-residential use. The Specific Plan designates 20 percent of the developable net floor area in development zones 1A, 1B, 2, 5B, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12 for parking. Based on the 20 percent ration the development of these nine zones would provide approximately 4,800 parking spaces whereas 7,200 spaces would be required with a deficit of 2,400 spaces. There would be a parking deficit, which could result in a significant parking impact. Sufficient on -street parking is currently available to meet the parking demand of 1,335 spaces for the remaining zones. For those projects that adequate on -site parking cannot be provided, developers would have to provide alternative parking solutions for their individual projects. Transit The Specific Plan does not proposed to change or impact existing or planned bus routes/bus stops that serve the Project Area. The current bus routes and bus stops will continue to serve the Project Area unless additional bus stops are necessary due to increased ridership and/or requests by the public. The Transit District does not feel the Specific Plan will significantly impact their existing or future levels of bus service. Lr National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 67 Future construction of street improvements and private development projects could impact existing bus stops. If bus stops will be impacted the Transit District will temporarily relocate the affected bus stop(s). The Transit District will need at least one weeks notice prior to the start of construction to notify the public and relocate the bus stop to a temporary location. Once construction is completed the bus stop will be relocated to its previous location. Truck Routes The construction of the proposed public street improvements could improve the circulation of truck traffic throughout the Project Area. Improvements that allow better truck circulation will have a positive impact by reducing delays and congestion on surface streets in the project area due to truck traffic. Bicycle Lanes The Specific Plan does not propose any bike trails or bike lanes in the rights of way of the streets in the Project Area. The Specific Plan will not impact the use of bicycles in the Project Area. The installation of bicycle racks throughout the project area will encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. While the city does not have marked bicycle lanes, the availability of bicycle racks could encourage the use of bicycles throughout the project area to reduce some vehicle trips. Conclusion E IT Based on the threshold criteria the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will impact sixteen (16) intersections and twelve (12) roadway segments that would not be impacted with buildout of the National City General Plan. Signalizing the existing nonsignalized intersections along with phasing, signal timing, and lane assignment changes to existing signalized intersections would mitigate some of the impacts. Implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would still result in impacts by the project to nine segments of I-5 both north and southbound during the AM and PM hours and thirteen intersections. Thus the project will have unavoidable adverse traffic impacts. The proposed parking space requirements of 1.2 spaces per residential unit and 2.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor space for non-residential use could result in parking impacts due to the lack of adequate on -site parking. 4.3.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended: Signalize the following intersections: • Main Street at Division Street • National City Boulevard at Division Street • Roosevelt Avenue at 7th Street • I-5 northbound and southbound ramps at 8th Street • Hoover Avenue at Plaza Boulevard • I-5 northbound on -ramp at Civic Center Drive c National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 68 LT Signal timing and phasing changes at the following intersections: • I-5 ramps/Harbor Drive at Civic Center Drive • Re -stripe the intersection of I-5 southbound off -ramp at Main Street from a left, shared left thru and a right lane to dual left and shared thru/right lane. In addition, the following general measures are recommended: • Provide bicycle racks when feasible to encourage the use of bicycles. • Promote ride -sharing programs for the businesses in the Project Area. • National City Transit District shall be notified in writing at least one week prior to the start of construction of any public or private project that will impact an existing bus stop/bus shelter to allow National City Transit District adequate time to provide a temporary bus stop/bus shelter. 4.3.4 Significance After Mitigation Even with the proposed mitigation measures the project will have unavoidable adverse traffic and circulation impacts because some street intersections and road segments will operate at unacceptable levels of service. In addition, developers may not be able to provide adequate on - site parking for projects in development zones 1A, 1B, 2, 5B, 6, 7, 9, 11, and 12 which would result in unavoidable adverse parking impacts. Thus, a statement of overriding considerations for traffic and parking impacts would have to be adopted by the city. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 69 This page intentionally left blank E 11 1 4.4 AESTHETICS 4.4.1 Existing Conditions The existing land uses in the Project Area include a mixture of uses including residential, retail, commercial, light industrial, public, and vacant land. Photographs of the existing uses were shown previously. As shown, there are new buildings (National City Chamber of Commerce and Southwestern College [under construction]), older residences, commercial uses, restaurants, retail stores, automotive repair shops, light industrial uses, hotels, historical structures, and vacant land. There is a mixture of older architecture as well as new design. Most of the buildings are single -story in height, although there are several multi -story buildings including the Red Lion Inn and Holiday Inn. The City of National City adopted a design guideline manual' (Guidelines) to ensure itself of development, which is in harmony with the character and quality of the environment that is desirable to the City. The purpose of the Guidelines is to provide a guide of what the City considers appropriate, quality design, which promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. The Guidelines articulate the City's goals and basic design philosophy for quality development and provides the framework for the design review process. The Guidelines are not specifications nor do they preclude alternatives or restrict imagination. They are the City's preference and provide examples of what the City considers acceptable.9 Many of the buildings in the Project Area were constructed prior to the adoption of the City's Design Guidelines. Therefore, there is a mixture of design and architectural styles represented in the Project Area. Most of the buildings do not meet the intent of the design guidelines in terms of consistent design, compatibility with surrounding development, scale and bulk, and other design parameters. As a result, there is not a consistent design or architectural theme throughout the Project Area and many of the existing uses are not compatible with the surrounding land uses in terms of architecture, and design. The National City Design Manual10 provides guidelines that assist the City and the development community to achieve a high quality of aesthetic and functional design. The guidelines are applied in conjunction with development standards to implement the City's design review process. The Design Guidelines do not specify a specific architectural theme, but rather identifies the type of development that is desirable in the city including height, color, scale and bulk, wall articulation, roof treatments, landscaping, etc. The Guidelines allow flexibility in architectural style while controlling development that is consistent with the policies of the General Plan. City of National City Design Guidelines, adopted by Resolution No. 91-15, February 12, 1991, amended by Resolution No. 96-19, February 6, 1996. 9 Ibid, page I -I. 10 Adopted by Resolution No. 17647 on September 6, 1994. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 70 Designated Scenic Resources There arc no designated scenic resources such as scenic highways, trees, or rock outcroppings in the Project Area. However, there are several buildings in that are historic properties. The Brick Row residential building on A Street between Plaza Boulevard and 11 `h Street is a National Historic Property. Several residences on A Street east of Brick Row are locally designated historical properties. The National City General Plan has goals and policies to encourage the preservation of existing aesthetic resources. 4.4.2 Project Impacts The threshold criteria for determining potential significant aesthetic impacts are if the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will: • Substantially impact a scenic vista; • Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings; • Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings; • Introduce a new source of substantial light or glare that adversely affects day or nighttime views in the area; or • Result in architecture, urban design, landscaping, and/or landforms that negatively detract from the prevailing aesthetic character of the site or surrounding area. The Specific Plan includes design guidelines for development in the Project Area. The Specific Plan guidelines supercede the existing National City Design Guidelines. The purpose of the Downtown Specific Plan Urban Design Guidelines is to help equip project applicants, decision - making bodies, funding bodies, and interested citizens with guidance on achieving and assessing the quality of urban design in redeveloping and restoring downtown areas.tt As stated in the Specific Plan, there are six key aspects of the Downtown Specific Plan Guidelines. A description of the six key aspects are provided below: 1. Create a Place for People — for places to be well used and well loved, they must be safe, comfortable, varied and attractive. They also need to be distinctive, and offer variety, choice, and fun. Vibrant places, a place worth caring about, offer opportunities for meeting people, playing the street and watching the world go by. 2. Enrich the Existing — New developments should enrich the qualities of existing urban places. This means encouraging a distinctive response that arises from and complements it's setting. This applies at every scale — the region, the city, the downtown, the block, the street. 3. Make Connections — Places need to be easy to get to and be integrated physically and visually with their surroundings. This requires attention to how to get around by foot, bicycle, public transportation and the car - and in that order. it National City Downtown Specific Plan, July 2004, page 11I-9. 11 1 1 1 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 71 1$ 4. Work with the Landscape — Places that strike a balance between the natural and man made environment and utilize each sites' intrinsic resources the climate, landform, landscape and ecology to maximize energy conservation and amenity. 5. Mix Uses and Forms — Stimulating, enjoyable and convenient places meet a variety of demands from the widest range possible range of users, amenities and social groups. They also weave together different building forms, uses, tenures, and densities. 6. Design for Change — New development needs to be flexible enough to respond to future changes in use, lifestyle and demography. This means designing for energy and resource efficiency; creating flexibility in the use of property, public spaces, and the service infrastructure and introducing new approaches to transportation, traffic management, and parking. Other design aspects of the Specific Plan include: a) Places for People/Human Scale Character; b) The Building/Street Edge; c) Pedestrian Facilities and Amenities; and d) Automobile Parking Facilities. The goals and features for each of these design aspects is discussed below. Places for People/Human Scale Character — The Specific Plan has two goals to establish a visual relationship between development and pedestrians: 1) Preserve the human scale character of the grid by using design techniques that reduce the apparent size, bulk, scale, and height of buildings; 2) Provide visual interest for pedestrians by incorporating building details that relate to the surrounding built environment at a human scale. To reach these goals, the Specific Plan has specific guidelines for buildings, such as a strong connection of the building with the ground so the building is visually anchored. The base of the building should appear more massive than the upper stories. Building details and public art elements are encouraged. The upper stories of buildings should exhibit a lighter character than the base, possibly by reducing floor area and building mass. Where appropriate, building tops should be articulated using elements such as tapered or sculpted roof forms to create silhouettes against the sky, roof materials and overhands to create strong shadow patterns and decorative cornices to provide visual interest. The perceived size, bulk, scale and height of the buildings should be reduced by either visually or physically dividing the mass into smaller scale components. The Building/Street Edge — There are two goals to provide a functional relationship between development and pedestrians: 1) encourage pedestrian activity on the street through building design. Frequent building entrances windows at pedestrian height, and outdoor activity spaces create a lively, pedestrian -friendly environment along public streets; 2) create visually unified street spaces by planning the orientation of buildings and building setbacks to enhance the character of the street. Streets are the center of the city life; a high level of social interaction on neighborhood and commercial streets is one of the foundations of a healthy, vibrant community. The Specific Plan has guidelines to promote and encourage pedestrian activity with building design. Proper National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 72 placement of building entrances and windows will be considered to determine appropriate pedestrian access points. Pedestrian Facilities and Amenities — There are four goals to improve pedestrian facilities and amenities to encourage pedestrian traffic in the Downtown Specific Plan Project Area: 1) create and maintain a continuous, convenient network of pedestrian facilities throughout the downtown to reduce dependence on the automobile; 2) provide pedestrian amenities, including street furniture, landscaping, lighting, and trash receptacles, to make walking more attractive and convenient; 3) design and locate pedestrian facilities and amenities to promote the uninterrupted flow of pedestrian traffic; and 4) create pedestrian links to transit and bicycle facilities to increase the convenience of transit and bicycle travel. The Specific Plan defines pedestrian facilities as improved walkways that are designed to carry pedestrian traffic between destinations and include: sidewalks; paseos; and pathways. All three of these facilities are proposed to encourage pedestrian traffic throughout the Project Area. General guidelines that are applicable to these pedestrian facilities include: 1) finding opportunities to create a continuous network of pedestrian facilities throughout the downtown; 2) design pedestrian facilities to minimize interruption by automobiles; 3) improved visibility when automobiles and pedestrian facilities intersect; 4) create a buffer between pedestrian facilities and automobiles; 5) identify existing obstructions to pedestrian travel and remove or relocate where feasible; 6) consider the use of pedestrian bridges in both public and private projects to enhance access; 7) consider the use of historic pedestrian connections; 8) consider retaining portions of street right-of-way for proposed street vacations to enhance pedestrian facilities; 9) design drainage facilities to minimize visibility and interference with pedestrian circulation; and 10) ensure that pedestrian facilities are designed for access by the disabled. Some of the factors the Specific Plan recommends for consideration when determining the type of pedestrian amenities that will be provided in a given area include: 1) create seating opportunities in areas where pedestrians congregate; 2) place trash cans, drinking fountains, newspaper vending machines, telephones, or other pedestrian amenities in areas with high levels of pedestrian traffic; 3) design new pedestrian amenities to complement the architectural styles of existing amenities and surrounding buildings while not overpowering the streetscape; 4) provide pedestrian -scaled lighting that complements the surrounding built and natural environment; 5) building identification signage adjacent to pedestrian facilities shall be small scale and oriented to pedestrians rather than passing cars. Landscaping will also play a key role to improve the aesthetics of the Project Area. The use of landscaping will be used to: 1) ensure that landscaping is appropriate for the site, is well maintained and does not create a safety hazard by concealing or overgrowing pedestrian facilities; 2) use canopy trees wherever possible to provide shade and weather protection for pedestrians; 3) use landscaping to provide a buffer between vehicles and pedestrians and to screen parking and utility areas. Pathways are encouraged and are a recommended priority to complement the network of public sidewalks in conjunction with the design of individual building sites. The guidelines for the use of pathways include: 1) establish direct pedestrian pathways between buildings to promote [1 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 73 1 1 efficient on -site circulation; 2) look for opportunities to connect adjacent properties with pathways, where appropriate. A key function of pedestrian facilities is to link transit and bicycle facilities with a variety of destinations. Pedestrian amenities enhance the walking experience and examples of pedestrian amenities include seating areas, canopy trees or other landscape elements, lighting, drinking fountains, news racks, trash containers, and telephones. Automobile Parking Facilities — There are three goals to provide adequate automobile parking facilities to meet the parking needs of future development. The goals include: 1) design automobile parking facilities to reduce the visibility of automobiles and allow features of greater pedestrian interest to dominate the streetscape; 2) design automobile parking facilities to confer priority on the safety and convenience of pedestrians and encourage pedestrian activity on the street; 3) create links between automobile parking facilities and other transportation facilities to increase the convenience of walking, bicycling, and transit. The Project Area has constraints associated with providing adequate parking for some of the existing uses. Increased development will require additional parking, as discussed in the traffic section. The key will be to provide adequate parking and not detract from the aesthetics of the Project Area. The Downtown Specific Plan has guidelines for two types of parking facilities (surface and parking structures) to ensure that parking facilities contribute to, rather than detract and impact pedestrian life. The Specific Plan encourages the incorporation of parking facilities with building and street designs to reduce and minimize the aesthetic impacts. The guidelines encourage the use of buildings and landscaping to buffer the parking facilities and share parking facilities between developments. Figure 14, Open Space Design Framework shows a conceptual landscaping plan. As shown, the Specific Plan proposes to provide landscaping along the key roadways throughout the Project Area, which will enhance and significantly improve the aesthetics of the downtown compared to the existing condition. The design guidelines along with the landscape amenities will have a significant positive aesthetic impact on the Project Area. Implementation of the design guidelines will provide a consistent building design throughout the Project Area. The construction of public open space hardscape and landscape improvements will provide a sense of open space in the downtown area and encourage the public to visit and use the public open space areas. The Specific Plan will significantly improve the existing aesthetics of downtown National City by creating a common architectural and design theme as well as improving the streetscape and public open space in the Project Area. Conclusion The Specific Plan design and landscaping guidelines will significantly improve the aesthetics of the Downtown Project Area. The incorporation of the recommended building designs, landscaping, pedestrian amenities to encourage foot -traffic, plaza fountain, etc. will create an improved downtown aesthetic feel. The Downtown Specific Plan should encourage the National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 74 This page.intentionally left blank tt F E c c 1 1 l Source: National City Downtown Specific Plan Figure 14 Open Space Design Framework L c L redevelopment of the downtown area from a mixture of old architecture and design to a consistent design throughout the Project Area. The Downtown Specific Plan will have a positive aesthetic impact that may, and is anticipated, to spillover to and have a positive impact to other areas of National City. Construction of hadscape and landscape improvements will significantly improve the aesthetics of the Project Area. All projects, including remodeling of existing buildings as well as new construction, will be reviewed by the City for consistency with the design guidelines of the Specific Plan during the project approval process. Compliance of projects with all applicable design requirements will ensure that development in the Project Area meets the design objectives of the Specific Plan. 4.4.3 Mitigation Measures 1. There will be no significant aesthetic impacts with the adoption and implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan. Therefore, no mitigation measures are required by CEQA. 4.4.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant aesthetic impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 76 This page intentionally left blank 1 1 L 4.5 NOISE 4.5.1 Existing Conditions The noise study assesses the potential noise impacts associated with the redevelopment of the National City Specific Plan area (Mestre Greve Associates Noise Study -Appendix D). Impacts from the construction and operation of the project are assessed in terms of noise levels generated from activities on the project site. Off -site noise impacts due to increased traffic noise from vehicle trips generated by the project are also examined along with traffic noise impacts upon the proposed project. Traffic noise levels were estimated using traffic volumes presented in the traffic study prepared for the project by Katz, Okitsu & Associates. Traffic volumes for the I-5 freeway were obtained from the SANDAG traffic projection web site (pele.sandag.org/trfic.html). First, background information on noise and the applicable noise criteria are presented along with a description of the existing noise environment. Background Noise Information Noise Criteria Background Sound is technically described in terms of the loudness (amplitude) of the sound and frequency (pitch) of the sound. The standard unit of measurement of the loudness of sound is the decibel (dB). Decibels are based on the logarithmic scale. The logarithmic scale compresses the wide range in sound pressure levels to a more usable range of numbers in a manner similar to the Richter scale used to measure earthquakes. In terms of human response to noise, a sound 10 dB higher than another is judged to be twice as loud; and 20 dB higher four times as loud; and so forth. Everyday sounds normally range from 30 dB (very quiet) to 100 dB (very loud). Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies, a special frequency - dependent rating scale has been devised to relate noise to human sensitivity. The A -weighted decibel scale (dBA) performs this compensation by discriminating against frequencies in a manner approximating the sensitivity of the human ear. Community noise levels are measured in terms of the "A -weighted decibel," abbreviated dBA. Sound levels decrease as a function of distance from the source as a result of wave divergence, atmospheric absorption and ground attenuation. As the sound wave form travels away from the source, the sound energy is dispersed over a greater area, thereby dispersing the sound power of the wave. Atmospheric absorption also influences the levels that are received by the observer. The greater the distance traveled, the greater the influence and the resultant fluctuations. The degree of absorption is a function of the frequency of the sound as well as the humidity and temperature of the air. Turbulence and gradients of wind, temperature and humidity also play a significant role in determining the degree of attenuation. Intervening topography can also have a substantial effect on the effective perceived noise levels. Noise has been defined as unwanted sound and it is known to have several adverse effects on people. From these known effects of noise, criteria have been established to help protect the public health and safety and prevent disruption of certain human activities. This criteria is based National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 77 on such known impacts of noise on people as hearing loss, speech interference, sleep interference, physiological responses and annoyance. Each of these potential noise impacts on people are briefly discussed in the following narratives: Hearing Loss is not a concern in community noise situations of this type. The potential for noise induced hearing loss is more commonly associated with occupational noise exposures in heavy industry or very noisy work environments. Noise levels in neighborhoods, even in very noisy airport environs, are not sufficiently loud to cause hearing loss. Speech Interference is one of the primary concerns in environmental noise problems. Normal conversational speech is in the range of 60 to 65 dBA and any noise in this range or louder may interfere with speech. There are specific methods of describing speech interference as a function of distance between speaker and listener and voice level. Sleep Interference is a major noise concern for traffic noise. Sleep disturbance studies have identified interior noise levels that have the potential to cause sleep disturbance. Note that sleep disturbance does not necessarily mean awakening from sleep, but can refer to altering the pattern and stages of sleep. Physiological Responses are those measurable effects of noise on people that are realized as changes in pulse rate, blood pressure, etc. While such effects can be induced and observed, the extent is not known to which these physiological responses cause harm or are sign of harm. Annoyance is the most difficult of all noise responses to describe. Annoyance is a very individual characteristic and can vary widely from person to person. What one person considers tolerable can be quite unbearable to another of equal hearing capability. Noise Assessment Metrics Several rating scales have been developed for measurement of community noise. These account for: (1) the parameters of noise that have been shown to contribute to the effects of noise on man, (2) the variety of noises found in the environment, (3) the variations in noise levels that occur as a person moves through the environment, and (4) the variations associated with the time of day. They are designed to account for the known health effects of noise on people described previously. Based on these effects, the observation has been made that the potential for a noise to impact people is dependent on the total acoustical energy content of the noise. A number of noise scales have been developed to account for this observation. Two of the predominate noise scales are the: Equivalent Noise Level (LEQ) and the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). These scales are described in the following paragraphs. LEQ is the sound level corresponding to a steady-state sound level containing the same total energy as a time -varying signal over a given sample period. LEQ is the "energy" average noise level during the time period of the sample. LEQ can be measured for any time period, but is typically measured for 1 hour. The 1-hour noise level can also be National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 78 L referred to as the Hourly Noise Level (HNL). It is the energy sum of all the events and background noise levels that occur during that time period. CNEL, Community Noise Equivalent Level, is the predominant rating scale now in use in California for land use compatibility assessment. The CNEL scale represents a time weighted 24-hour average noise level based on the A -weighted decibel. Time weighted refers to the fact that noise that occurs during certain sensitive time periods is penalized for occurring at these times. The evening time period (7 p.m. to 10 p.m.) penalizes noises by 5 dBA, while nighttime (10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) noises are penalized by 10 dBA. These time periods and penalties were selected to reflect people's increased sensitivity to noise during these time periods. A CNEL noise level may be reported as a "CNEL of 60 dBA," "60 dBA CNEL," or simply "60 CNEL." Ldn, the day -night scale is similar to the CNEL scale except that evening noises are not penalized. It is a measure of the overall noise experienced during an entire day. The time -weighted refers to the fact that noise that occurs during certain sensitive time periods is penalized for occurring at these times. In the Ldn scale, those noise levels that occur during the night (10 pm to 7 am) are penalized by 10 dB. This penalty was selected to attempt to account for increased human sensitivity to noise during the quieter period of a day, where home and sleep is the most probable activity. L(%) is a statistical method of describing noise which accounts for variance in noise levels throughout a given measurement period. L(%) is a way of expressing the noise level exceeded for a percentage of time in a given measurement period. For example since 5 minutes is 25% of 20 minutes, L(25) is the noise level that is equal to or exceeded for five minutes in a twenty -minute measurement period. It is L(%) that is used for most Noise Ordinance standards. For example most daytime city, state and county Noise Ordinances use an ordinance standard of 55 dBA for 30 minutes per hour or an L(50) level of 55 dBA. In other words the Noise Ordinance states that no noise level should exceed 55 dBA for more that fifty percent of a given period. Noise Criteria The National City Noise Ordinance and Noise Element of the General Plan contain the City's policies on noise. The Noise Ordinance applies to noise on one property impacting a neighboring property. It sets limits on noise levels at a neighboring property from a noise source on another property. The Noise Ordinance requirements cannot be applied to noise generated by vehicles traveling on public roadways railroads or aircraft. Control of the mobile noise sources on public roads is preempted by federal and State laws. It can be applied to vehicles traveling on private property (e.g. parking lots or loading docks). The Noise Element of the General Plan typically presents planning standards for noise levels from transportation noise sources, vehicles on public roadways, railroads and aircraft. These limits are imposed on new developments. The new developments must incorporate the measures to ensure that the limits are not exceeded. The Noise Ordinance and Noise Element policies are presented below. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 79 National City Noise Element The National City General Plan (1996) presents four City policies related to noise: 1. Transportation and land use planning will be coordinated to promote acceptable noise levels for specific types of urban activities. 2. The City will encourage the location of sensitive land uses away from high noise areas, or require mitigation to control adverse noise impacts. 3. Protection from excessive levels of noise will be a high priority in National City to provide a quality living environment. 4. The City will seek to maintain noise levels, which are consistent with Title 12 of the National City Municipal Code. The General Plan presents four Implementation items related to noise: 1. Encourage construction by Caltrans of sound barriers along I-805 and I-5, where appropriate and desirable to protect adjoining residential neighborhoods or sensitive facilities such as schools and parks. 2. Continue enforcement of the City's Noise Control Ordinance, both by responding directly to complaints and by conducting field monitoring compliance checks to identify violators. 3. Regulate the placement and construction both of new noise generators, to avoid excessive interior and exterior noise level impacts on adjacent properties; and of new noise receptors (such as housing and schools), to minimize the negative effects of local noise generation. 4. Promote retrofitting with noise reduction materials of existing sensitive noise receptors (residences, schools, rest homes) in areas subject to high noise levels. The Noise Element does not specify any noise limits for new developments impacted by transportation noise that is not regulated by the Noise Ordinance. The Noise Ordinance specifies exterior noise limits that cannot be exceeded based on the land use impacted by the noise. These limits are presented in Table 11, Noise Ordinance Exterior Noise Limits. The Ordinance differentiates between Environmental noises and Nuisance noises. Environmental noises are "resulting from land use activity normally permitted under the land use code, but which exceed the noise level limits set by this code for that particular land use." Nuisance noises are "those intrusive noises, other than environmental noises, which, because of their unusual presence, are or may be considered harmful to health and well-being, due to their raucous, annoying, or obnoxious and unpleasant nature and characteristics. A nuisance noise is a noise that constitutes a "public nuisance," as defined in Civil Codc section 3479." For environmental noises the hourly average (Leq(h)) noise level cannot exceed the limits presented in Table 10, Noise Ordinance Exterior Noise Limits. For nuisance noises the peak National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 80 (Lmax) noise level cannot exceed the limits shown in the table. The noise levels cannot he exceeded at or beyond the boundary of the property on which the sound is produced. Table 10 Noise Ordinance Exterior Noise Limits Allowable Noise Level (dBA) Receiving Land Use Category 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. All residential (less than 9 dwelling units) 45 55 Multi -unit residential (Consisting of 9 dwelling 50 60 units or more) and Public Space Commercial Light Industry, Industry east of I-5 Heavy Industry, Industry west of 1-5 60 65 70 70 80 80 The Noise Ordinance also presents interior noise standards, however, these are strictly limited to activities in one unit of a multi -unit residential structure impacting another unit. Other noise generating activities are specifically prohibited, if they are performed in a way to cause a Noise Disturbance, during specific hours (Chapter 12.10). These sources include radios, television sets, musical instruments, and similar devices, loudspeakers, projection of telephone sound to an outdoor area, animals and birds, loading and unloading, and construction/demolition. The two sources relevant to the Specific Plan are loading and unloading and construction/demolition Loading and unloading of vehicles, including handling of boxes, crates, containers, building materials, garbage cans, or similar objects in a was to create a Noise Disturbance across a residential real property line is prohibited between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Construction adjacent to residential and commercial areas is prohibited between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday along with weekends and holidays. Outside of these hours construction equipment must not exceed the maximum noise levels presented in Table 11, Construction Equipment Noise Limits. Existing Noise Measurements To determine the existing noise environment in the Project Area, ambient noise measurements were made on March 12, 2004 between 11:00 a.m. and 1:40 p.m. at five locations. The locations of the noise measurement sites are shown in Figure 15, Noise Measurement Location Map. Noise levels were measured for 15 minutes at each location. The noise measurement results are presented in Table 12, Existing Noise Measurements in terms of the equivalent noise levels (Leq), maximum noise levels, minimum noise levels and percentile noise levels (L%). The L50 percentile level for example, represents the noise levels exceeded 50 percent of the time, and represents the median ambient noise level. The L90 noise levels represent the background noise levels, which are exceeded 90 percent of the time. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 81 This page intentionally left blank t�. LEGEND . Commercial Street Level Structure, Yr ^; Matmic Brick Roe and Kimball House ▪ Hotel Multistory amebae, NstgMerhced What (Mg ban) Educetlon Village Designated Permit. Single Family Residential Structure ▪ Light Industrial &Natures 1i Community Churches Sacred Structures . ImaltutierieL City and Chamber Shuclwea ▪ Edst ng Parking Lot Spaces end Structures ■ Commercial bank Stanch Structures Cammerelal Restaurant/Dar Structures ■ C D C OISw. and Properties Residential Wg4P.rniy Structures Specific Plan Boundary c41 D70-:VIa^ 2 ,/! Rt _ 1f 1 IQ aractir iIC AYf�lMdt "11 _ a G. ion a' Source: Mestre Greve Associates Figure 15 Noise Measurements Location Map Type II Areas Type I Areas Semi -Residential Equipment Type Residential Commercial Mobile Equipment Maximum noise levels for nonscheduled, intermittent, 75 dBA 85 dBA short-term operation (less than ten days) of mobile equipment: Stationary Equipment Maximum noise levels for repetitively scheduled and relatively long-term operation (periods of ten days or more) of stationary equipment: Table 11 Construction Equipment Noise Limits 60 dBA 70 dBA Table 12 Existing Noise Measurements Sound Level (dBA) Site Start Time Leq Lmax L10 L50 L90 Latin 1 11:01 AM 70 76 71 70 69 57 2 11:42 AM 60 71 62 59 57 56 3 12:20 PM 59 75 60 57 55 53 4 12:53 PM 55 64 57 54 52 50 5 1:25 PM 65 72 67 64 62 60 Site 1 is located on the south side of 4th Street between Roosevelt Avenue and National City Boulevard. The primary source of noise at the site was traffic on I-5, with traffic on National City Boulevard contributing substantially. Intermittent traffic on Roosevelt Avenue also contributed to the noise environment. A semi -trailer truck on Roosevelt was the cause of the maximum noise level. The noise level at the site was between 69 and 71 dBA for 80 % of the measurement period. This will be characterized as a noisy environment. Site 2 is located at the northeast corner of 9th Street and B Avenue. Distant traffic was the primary source of noise with intermittent traffic on the adjacent roadways contributing. A semi- trailer truck making a delivery to a nearby business (about 70 feet from the site) caused the maximum noise level. Noise from a forklift unloading the truck, including a backup beeper was also audible during the measurement. The noise level was between 57 and 62 dBA for the majority of the noise measurement. This will be characterized as a moderately noisy environment. Site 3 is located in a city facility parking lot off of 12th Street east of National City Boulevard. Traffic on National City Boulevard was the dominant source of noise. Intermittent traffic on 12th Street and parking lot activity contributed to the noise environment. The maximum noise level was caused by a bus's air breaks on 12th Street. The noise level was between 55 and 60 dBA for the majority of the noise measurement. This will be characterized as a moderately noisy environment. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 83 Road Segment Main Street I-5 Ramp to Division/Roosevelt Roosevelt to National City Blvd Roosevelt Avenue Division to 8th 8th to Plaza Plaza to Civic Ctr. Civic Ctr. to 18th National City Boulevard Division to 1st/ Main 1st to4t Site 4 is located on the east side of C Avenue between 8th and 9th streets. The dominant source of noise was distant traffic on the busier streets in the area. Intermittent traffic on the adjacent streets also contributed to the noise environment. A truck on C Avenue caused the maximum noise level. The noise level was between 52 and 57 dBA for the majority of the noise measurement. This will be characterized as a moderate noise environment. Site 5 is located on the south side of 9th Street between Hoover Avenue and Coolidge Avenue. Traffic on I-5 was the dominant source of noise. Intermittent local traffic and noise from activities at a nearby car dealership also contributed to the noise environment. A car on 9th Street resulted in the maximum noise level. The noise level was between 62 and 67 dBA during the majority of the noise measurement. This will be characterized as a relatively noisy environment. Existing Roadway Noise Levels An estimate of highway noise levels in terms of CNEL was computed for the roadways affected by project traffic. The Highway Noise Model published by the Federal Highway Administration ("FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model," FHWA-RD-77-108, December, 1978) was utilized. The CALVINO noise emission curves developed by Caltrans were used with the FHWA model. These curves better model the California vehicle mix. The FHWA Model uses traffic volume, vehicle mix, vehicle speed, and roadway geometry to compute the "equivalent noise level." A computer code has been written which computes equivalent noise levels for each of the time periods used in the calculation of CNEL. Weighting these noise levels and summing them results in the CNEL for the traffic projections used. The distances to the existing 60, 65 and 70 CNEL contours for the roadways in the vicinity of the Project Area are shown in Table 13, Modeled Existing Roadway Traffic Noise Levels. The CNEL at 100 feet from the roadway centerline is also presented. These represent the distance from the centerline of the road to the contour value shown. The values represent existing noise levels and do not take into account the effect of any existing noise barriers or topography that may affect ambient noise levels. Where the line of sight between an observer and a roadway is blocked by a substantial object (a berm, block wall or building) the traffic noise levels are reduced by about 5 dB at a minimum. Table 13 Modeled Existing Roadway Traffic Noise Levels CNEL@ Distance to CNEL Contour (feet)' 100'' 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL 60.2 RW 48 103 60.1 RW 47 101 56.0 RW 25 54 54.3 RW RW 42 54.3 RW RW 42 53.3 RW RW RW 57.5 RW RW 68 61.6 RW 59 127 1 c B L L 1 L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 84 1 CNEL@ Distance to CNEL Contour (feet)' Road Segment 100'' 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL 4th to 8th 62.4 RW 67 144 8th to Plaza 62.5 RW 68 146 Plaza to 12th 61.0 RW 54 117 12th to Civic Center Dr 60.8 RW 53 114 Civic Center Dr to 16th 60.8 RW 53 114 16th to 18t 61.0 RW 54 116 18`h to 24t 61.1 RW 55 119 D Ave 8t to Plaza 55.3 RW 22 48 Plaza to 16t 55.0 RW RW 46 Highland Avenue Division to 4th 58.9 RW 39 84 4t to 8`h 58.1 RW 35 75 8t to Plaza 60.7 RW 52 112 Plaza to 16a' 60.9 RW 54 115 16t to 18t 60.5 RW 50 108 18`h to 24t 60.8 RW 53 113 Division Street Main/Roosevelt to National City Blvd 56.5 RW 27 58 National City Blvd to View Ave 58.2 RW 35 76 View Ave to Highland 58.9 RW 39 85 8th Street I-5 S Ramp to Roosevelt 61.8 RW 61 132 Roosevelt to National City Blvd 62.4 RW 67 144 National City Blvd to D Ave 62.8 RW 71 154 D Ave to Highland Ave 61.3 RW 56 122 Plaza Blvd Hoover to National City Blvd 58.6 RW 38 81 National City Blvd to D Ave 59.5 RW 43 92 D Ave to Highland Ave 59.9 RW 46 98 Civic Center Drive Wilson Ave to Roosevelt Ave 55.9 RW 25 53 Roosevelt Ave to National City Blvd 53.2 RW RW 35 16th Street National City Blvd to D Ave 56.1 RW 25 55 D Ave to Highland Ave 56.9 RW 29 62 18th Street National City Blvd to D Ave 57.0 RW 29 63 D Ave to Highland Ave 56.7 RW 28 60 24th Street I-5 to Wilson Ave 63.7 38 82 176 Wilson Ave to National City Blvd 61 25 54 117 National City Blvd to D Ave 58.7 RW 38 82 D Ave to Highland Ave 58.7 RW 38 82 Interstate-5 North of 8"' Street 79.5 428 921 1,985 South of 8th Street 79.3 415 894 1,926 1. From Roadway Centerline RW-Contour Falls Within Roadway Right -of -Way National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 85 Table 13 shows that the greatest noise levels are generated along Interstate 5 and these levels are substantial as they substantially exceed 65 CNEL along the edge of the freeway. Noise levels along National City Boulevard, and 8`h Street are considerable. Noise levels along these roadways moderately exceed 65 CNEL. Traffic noise levels along the other roadways are Moderate. In most cases the 65 CNEL contour extends only just beyond the roadway right of way. 4.5.2 Project Impact The threshold criteria for determining whether or not the project could have significant noise impacts are based on whether or not adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan: • Result in exterior noise levels that exceed 65 CNEL in residential areas and outdoor recreational areas; • Result in interior noise levels that exceed 45 dB CNEL for single-family and multi -family residential homes; • Create a substantial permanent or temporary increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Potential noise impacts are commonly divided into two groups; temporary and long term. Temporary impacts are usually associated with noise generated by constriction activities. Long- term impacts are further divided into impacts on surrounding land uses generated by the proposed project and those impacts, which occur from activities at the proposed project site. Potential traffic noise impacts on the proposed project are also assessed. Noise Impact Criteria Off -site impacts from on -site activities, temporary and long-teiicr, are measured against the National City Noise Ordinance presented previously. Any activity on private property must comply with the Noise Ordinance. Long-term off -site impacts from traffic noise are measured against two criteria. Both criteria must be met for a significant impact to be identified. First, project traffic must cause a noticeable noise level increase on a roadway segment adjacent to a noise sensitive land use. Second the resulting future with project noise level muss exceed the criteria level for the noise sensitive land use. In this case, the criteria level is 65 CNEL for residential land uses. In community noise assessment, changes in noise levels greater than 3 dB are often identified as noticeable, while changes less than 1 dB will not be discernible to local residents. In the range of 1 to 3 dB, residents who are very sensitive to noise may perceive a slight change. Note that there is no scientific evidence is available to support the use of 3 dB as the significance threshold. In laboratory testing situations, humans are able to detect noise level changes of slightly less than 1 dB. In a community noise situation, however, noise exposures are over a long time period, and changes in noise levels occur over years, rather than the immediate comparison made in a u B C L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 86 c 1 laboratory situation. Therefore, the level at which changes in community noise levels become discernible is likely to be some value greater than 1 dB, and 3 dB appears to be appropriate for most people. If the project results in a 3 dB increase and the future with project noise level is in excess of 65 CNEL at a residential land use, the project will result in a significant noise impact. Long-term cumulative off -site impacts from traffic noise are also measured against two criteria. Both criteria must be met for a significant impact to be identified. First, future traffic noise levels must increase by 3dB or more compared to existing conditions on a roadway segment adjacent to a noise sensitive land use. Second, the resulting future with project noise level must exceed the criteria level for the noise sensitive land use. In this case, the criteria level is 65 CNEL for residential land uses. The project will have considerably contributed to this increase if it contributes more than 1dB to the increase. Long-term on -site impacts from traffic noise are typically measured against the noise level limits applied by the City. However, the City of National City has not established noise standards for new development. Multi -family housing is required by the building code to achieve a 45 CNEL interior noise standard. Most communities with noise standards extend this limit to all residential uses. Figure 16, State of California Land Use/Noise Compatibility Guidelines presents the states noise guidelines. Based on these guidelines 50 CNEL is a typical interior noise standard for offices and 55 CNEL is a typical standard for retail uses. Outdoor noise level standards are not typically set for commercial uses. For residential uses the most typical standard is 65 CNEL. This standard typically only applies to private outdoor living areas. This includes rear yards of single-family homes and patios and balconies of multi -family homes. These noise standards will be used to assess the compatibility of the proposed uses with the noise environment. Temporary Impacts Construction Noise Construction noise, generally, represents a short-term impact on ambient noise levels. Noise generated by construction equipment and construction activities can reach high levels. Construction equipment noise comes under the control of the Environmental Protection Agency's Noise Control Program (Part 204 of Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations). Examples of construction noise at 50 feet are presented in Figure 17, Construction Equipment Noise Levels. At this time the specific plan simply proposes redesignation of land uses and not specific projects. There are no details available for future projects, therefore, potential construction noise impacts can only be discussed generally. The equipment used for demolition site grading will generate the highest construction noise levels. Figure 17 shows that the peak noise level generated by the equipment that will he used during grading is 70 to 95 dBA at a distance of 50 feet. At 150 feet, the peak construction noise levels range from 61 to 86 dBA. At 1000' the peak noise levels range from 44 to 69 dBA. Note that these noise levels are based upon worst - case conditions and typically noise levels near the site will be less. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 87 This page intentionally left blank c 1 1• Land Use Category Community Noise Exposure Ldn or CNEL, d8 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential - Low Dens'"4.t Single Family, Duplex, Mobile Hornet Residential-'.� Multi. Family Transient Lodging - Motels, Hotels . Schools, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes - °;;■ Auditoriums. Concert Halls, Amphitheaters ",i�'` . 5:`=fT = y .'.`�. Sports Arena, Outdoor Spectator Sports - .- , 3'f-.• - i'�`..... Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteres - , MI d. .. - i _F Bfficn Buildings,II Business Commercial and Professional Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture INTERPRETATION; Normally Acceptable Specified land use is satisfactory, based upon the assumption that any buildings involved are of normal conventional construction, without any special noise insulation requirements Conditionally Acceptable New construction or development should be undertaken only atter a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Conventional construction, but With closed windows and fresh air supply systems or air conditioning will normally suffice. Normally Unacceptable New construction or development should generally be discouraged. If new construction or development does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. MEE Clearly Unacceptable New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Figure 16 Source: Mestre Greve Associates California Land UselNoise Coinpatiblity Guidelines c E. C c A -Weighted Sound Level (d8A) At 50 Feet Equipment 60 70 80 90 100 110 Compacter (Rollers) Front Loader Badchoe Tractor Scraper, Grader Paver Truck Concrete Mixer Concrete Pump Crane (Movable) Crane (Derrick) Pump Generator Compressor Pneumatic Wrench Jackhammer and Drill Pile Drivers (Peak Levels) Vibrator Saw 60 70 80 90 100 110 Source: Mestre Greve Associates Construction Equipment Noise Levels Figure 17 In some areas within the Project Arca construction will occur directly adjacent to existing residential areas. When construction occurs directly adjacent to residences high noise levels can be expected, upwards of 100 dBA, but for very short periods of time. Any construction has the potential to violate the construction noise level limits from the City's Noise Ordinance. To ensure that construction does not violate the Noise Ordinance limits specific projects will be required to submit a Construction Noise Abatement Plan prior to issuance of building permits. Long Term Off -Site Impacts Increases in traffic noise levels due to traffic generated by the specific plan were examined. Residential projects do not typically result in noise impacts from on site activities. Commercial uses located adjacent to residential uses have the potential for noise impacts. Potential issues related to commercial/residential interfaces were also examined. Traffic Noise Impacts from noise produced by traffic generated by the Specific Plan are estimated based on the traffic projections presented in the traffic study. By comparing the traffic volumes for different scenarios, the changes in noise levels along roadways in the vicinity of the project can be estimated. To estimate the noise level increases over existing conditions, the existing traffic volume is compared to the future with project traffic volume. To estimate noise level increases due to the specific plan, the future with project traffic volume is compared to the future without traffic volume. Table 14, Traffic Noise CNEL Increases With Project presents the traffic noise level increases due to the Specific Plan. The first column of the table presents the roadway segments analyzed. The second column shows how much the traffic noise level along each of the roadway segments is projected to increase over existing conditions. The increase is due to the Specific Plan along with other planned growth in the area. The third column shows how much of this increase is due to the Specific Plan. Table 14 Traffic Noise CNEL Increases With Project Road Segment Main Street I-5 Ramp to Division/Roosevelt Roosevelt Avenue Division to 8th 8th to Plaza Plaza to Civic Ctr. Civic Center to 18`r National City Boulevard Division to 1st/ Main ls` to 4th 4th to 8a' CNEL Noise Level Increase Db Over Existing Due To Project 3.3 1.2 7.7 7.4 1.5 0.8 3.6 0.6 2.5 7.1 5.4 1.1 0.6 3.1 0.4 2.2 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 90 Road Segment 8th to Plaza Plaza to 12th 12th to Civic Center Dr Civic Center Dr to 16th 16t to 18th 1 8th to 24th D Ave 8th to Plaza Plaza to 166 Highland Avenue Division to 4th dth to 8th 8th to Plaza Plaza to 16th 16th to 18th 18th to 24`h Division Street Main/Roosevelt to National City Blvd National City Blvd to View Ave View Ave to Highland Ave 8th Street I-5 S ramp to Roosevelt Roosevelt to National City Blvd National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave Plaza Blvd Hoover to National City Blvd National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave Civic Center Drive Wilson Ave to Roosevelt Ave Roosevelt Ave to National City Blvd 16th Street National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave 18th Street National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave 24th Street I-5 to Wilson Ave Wilson Ave to National City Blvd National City Blvd to D Ave D Ave to Highland Ave CNEL Noise Level Increase Db Over Existing 1.0 2.7 2.8 2.6 2.3 1.2 Due To Projct 0.8 2.3 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.0 3.2 2.5 4.8 0.7 2.3 2.6 1.5 1.5 0.6 1.8 4.3 1.5 1.3 3.8 2.8 -0.6 1.4 3.8 4.5 1.4 2.1 2.4 1.3 1.3 0.4 1.6 4.1 1.3 1.1 2.4 1.6 -0.9 1.1 2.9 1.9 1.1 4.3 4.0 3.0 2.8 1.2 0.7 -0.1 -0.6 0.6 -0.3 1.4 1.2 0.9 2.7 0.7 0.4 0.0 1.1 0.4 0.2 Table 14 shows that project generated traffic noise level increases by more than 3 dB or greater are projected along five roadways. There are commercial uses only along three of the roadway segments (Roosevelt and Division Streets from Main Street; Roosevelt Avenue to National City Boulevard), which arc not considered a noise sensitive land use. There are residential uses along the two remaining segments that are projected to be exposed to substantial noise increase due to National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 91 11 11 1 L 1 1 L the project. Absolute noise levels at noise sensitive receptors for each of these segments is described below. National City Boulevard from Division Street to 1st Avenue/Main Street — There are residential uses along the north side of this roadway segment. Several residences front National City Boulevard and the two residences at the ends front Division Street and 1st Avenue. This area is exposed to traffic noise from Interstate 5 as well as traffic on National City Boulevard. Combining the noise effects from both roadways results in the residences being exposed to a total traffic noise of level increase of 1.7 dB due to the project and 2.4 over existing conditions. Traffic noise levels currently exceed 65 CNEL at these homes and will continue to exceed 65 CNEL. However, the total noise level increase due to the project will be less than 3 Db, and therefore, these homes will not be significantly impacted by the project. Civic Center Drive from Wilson Avenue to Roosevelt Avenue — There are single-family and multi -family residential uses along both sides of this roadway segment. For the most part homes front the roadway. The future 65 CNEL contour with the project extends approximately 15 feet beyond the roadway right of way (47 feet from the centerline). These homes are projected to be exposed to traffic noise levels as high as 67 CNEL and experience noise level increases of greater than 3 dB due to the project. Homes along this roadway segment will be significantly impacted by the project. D Avenue from Plaza Boulevard to 16th Avenue - There are single-family and multi -family homes located on both side of this road segment. The future 65 CNEL contour with the specific plan will extend approximately 20 to 25 feet beyond the roadway right of way (45 feet from the centerline). Residences will be exposed to noise levels as high as 68 CNEL. The project will contribute 0.7 dB of the projected cumulative 4.8 dB increase over the existing condition. The project will not substantially contribute to the noise level increase and is not required to provide mitigation. The bulk of the noise level increase is due to other traffic growth in the area and not associated with the proposed project. D Avenue from 8th Street to Plaza Boulevard - There are single-family and multi -family homes located on both side of this road segment. The south side of the road is located within the boundary of the specific plan. The future 65 CNEL contour by the project extends approximately 10 to 15 feet beyond the roadway right of way (37 feet from the centerline). Residences will be exposed to noise levels as high as 67 CNEL. The project is projected to contribute 2.5 dB of the overall 3.2 dB increase over the existing condition. Homes along this roadway segment will be significantly impacted by a cumulative increase in noise and the project contributes substantially to this cumulative noise level increase. Plaza Boulevard from Hoover Avenue to National City Boulevard - There are a few single family residences located on both sides of this roadway segment near Hoover Avenue. All of the homes face Plaza Boulevard. The future 65 CNEL contour of the project extends approximately 35 feet beyond the roadway right of way (68 feet from the centerline). Residences will be exposed to noise levels as high as 69 CNEL. The project is projected to contribute 2.9 dB of the overall 3.8 dB increase over the existing condition. Homes along this roadway segment will be significantly cumulatively impacted and the project contributes substantially to this increase. National City Downtown Specific Plan September 2004 Program ETR Page 92 Plaza Boulevard from National City Boulevard to D Avenue - There are single-family and multi family residences on both sides of this road segment. Homes on the west side of the roadway are located within the Specific Plan boundary. On the east side homes just south of B Avenue to D Avenue are outside of the Specific Plan boundary. The future 65 CNEL contour with the project extends approximately 55 feet beyond the roadway right of way (86 feet from the centerline). Residences will be exposed to noise levels as high as 71 CNEL. The project is projected to contribute 1.9 dB of the overall 4.5 dB increase over the existing condition. Homes along this roadway segment will be significantly cumulatively impacted and the project contributes substantially to this increase. Future with Project Noise Levels The distances to the future 60, 65 and 70 CNEL contours for the roadways are presented in Table 15, Future with Project Traffic Noise Levels. These represent the distance from the centerline of the road to the contour value shown. Table 15 Future with Project Traffic Noise Levels CNEL@ Distance to CNEL Contour (feet)1 Road Segment 100j1 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL Main Street I-5 Ramp to Division/Roosevelt 63.5 37 79 171 Roosevelt Avenue Division to 8th 63.7 38 82 177 8th to Plaza 61.8 28 61 131 Plaza to Civic Ctr. 55.9 RW 25 53 Civic Center to 18th 54.1 RW RW 40 National City Boulevard Division to 1st/ Main 61.1 RW 55 119 1st to 4d' 62.2 RW 65 140 4th to 8d' 64.9 46 98 211 8th to Plaza 63.5 37 79 171 Plaza to 12th 62.8 39 83 179 12th to Civic Center Dr 63.7 38 81 175 Civic Center Dr to 16th 63.4 36 78 169 16t to 18t 63.3 36 77 166 18th to 24t 62.3 RW 66 143 D Ave 8th to Plaza 58.5 RW 37 79 Plaza to 16d' 59.8 RW 45 98 Highland Avenue Division to 4th 4th to 8th 8th to Plaza Plaza to 16th l6`hto 18th 18d' to 24th Division Street Main/Roosevelt to National City Blvd 60.8 24 53 113 61.2 RW 56 120 60.7 RW 51 111 62.2 RW 65 141 62.4 RW 67 145 61.2 RW 55 119 62.6 RW 70 150 E 11 E r National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 93 CNEL@ Distance to CNEL Contour (feet)' Road Segment 100'1 70 CNEL 65 CNEL 60 CNEL National City Blvd to View Ave 59.7 RW 45 96 View Ave to Highland Ave 60.2 22 48 103 8th Street I-5 S Ramp to Roosevelt 65.7 51 111 238 Roosevelt to National City Blvd 65.2 48 103 222 National City Blvd to D Ave 62.2 RW 65 141 D Ave to Highland Ave 62.6 RW 70 150 Plaza Blvd Hoover to National City Blvd 62.4 31 68 145 National City Blvd to D Ave 64.0 40 86 186 D Ave to Highland Ave 62.1 RW 64 138 Civic Center Drive Wilson Ave to Roosevelt Ave 60.1 22 47 102 Roosevelt Ave to National City Blvd 56.2 RW 26 56 16th Street National City Blvd to D Ave 57.3 RW 30 66 D Ave to Highland Ave 56.8 RW 28 61 18th Street National City Blvd to D Ave 57.5 RW 32 68 D Ave to Highland Ave 58.0 RW 34 74 24th Street 1-5 to Wilson Ave 64.6 44 94 202 Wilson Ave to National City Blvd 63.8 38 83 178 National City Blvd to D Ave 59.3 RW 42 90 D Ave to Highland Ave 59.1 RW 41 87 Interstate-5 North of 8th Street 80.4 490 1,056 2,274 South of 8th Street 79.8 452 975 2,100 1. From Roadway Centerline RW-Contour Falls Within Roadway Right -of -Way Table 15 shows that the noise levels that are currently generated along I-5 will continue to be substantial. Traffic noise levels along National City Boulevard, and 8th Street are considerable. Noise levels along Highland Avenue and portions of Plaza Boulevard (National City to D Avenue) will become considerable in the future. Noise levels along these roadways moderately exceed 65 CNEL. Traffic noise levels along the other roadways will remain moderate. in most cases the 65 CNEL contour extends only just beyond the roadway right of way. On -Site Activities Because specific development projects are not proposed as part of the specific plan, the potential noise impacts from on site activities of specific projects is discussed in general terms. Noise impacts on residential areas typically occur only where the residential areas directly abut commercial areas. In general, existing residential areas are located on the opposite sides of roadways from proposed commercial areas. However, the project proposes several mixed -use areas that are located adjacent to existing residential areas, specifically east of National City Boulevard. The sources of noise from commercial portions of mixed uses that have the potential National City Downtown Specific Plan Program FIR September 2004 Page 94 to impact residential uses include parking lot activity, mechanical equipment, and delivery trucks/loading docks. In addition, specific uses in the mixed -use portions of the project not yet identified area could generate significant noise levels. Restaurants, nightclubs, and bars are often sources of noise issues due to their late night operation. In any case, all of the commercial uses will need to comply with the City of National City Noise Ordinance. Typically this will only be a concern at the commercial portions of the mixed -use sites located directly adjacent to existing residential uses. It is possible that some uses in the commercial portions of the project will exceed the Noise Ordinance. Long Term On -Site Impacts Future noise levels along the roadways in the Project Area were presented in Table 15. For the Project Area, these contours are produced graphically in Figure 18, Traffic Noise CNEL Contours. As discussed previously, these contours do not take into account the effects of buildings, noise barriers, or topography. They represent the worst -case noise contours. The 70 CNEL contour for the freeway is shown overlaid on the other contours because the location of the 70 CNEL contour is near the point where buildings and other structures substantially affect the noise levels generated by the freeway. The noise levels along the I-5 freeway are substantial. Commercial uses along Roosevelt between Division and 7th Street will be exposed to noise levels as high as 76 CNEL. Building along this roadway will be required to achieve up to 26 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction to meet the 50 CNEL office interior noise standard. Residential uses proposed between 8th Street, Plaza Boulevard, Roosevelt Avenue, and I-5 will also be exposed to noise levels as high as 76 CNEL. These buildings will be required to achieve up to 31 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction to meet the 45 CNEL residential interior noise standard. Residential uses (including mixed use) along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, and Plaza Boulevard will be exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. At this time it is not known if any outdoor living areas are proposed and would be exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. Standard construction achieves at least 20 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise attenuation with windows closed. Detailed calculations are required to determine if a building achieves more than 20 dB of attenuation. Residential uses along these roadways will require detailed noise assessments to determine if they provide adequate noise reduction so interior noise levels do not exceed 45 CNEL. Proposed residential use (including mixed use) along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, Plaza Boulevard and Roosevelt Avenue will be exposed to noise levels in excess of 60 CNEL. With open windows, typical residential construction achieves approximately 12 dB of outdoor -to - indoor noise reduction. To achieve the 45 CNEL interior noise standard homes along these roadways will require closed windows. The windows do not need to be sealed shut, but closeable at the occupants' discretion. In order to assume that windows can remain closed adequate ventilation must be provided per the Uniform Building Code (UBC). This ventilation requirement is typically satisfied typically mechanical ventilation or through air conditioning. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 95 c:r3 77771 771 C771 777-1 7-7 o, I ............................ LAND US CATIEGOMIS r7-1 IlL Ei ^ • I/0 1.,( • ' ari.0"04, r „Arip,rwiryslyt,grigiwa.mtirArreergialf—N,waiarvii,gf traNme trarap.wmarmr vi7 II! TT:ITT '6D Source: Mestre Greve Associates Figure 18 Traffic Noise CNEL Countours E L Other than those located along Roosevelt and the I-5 Freeway, commercial uses are projected to be exposed to a maximum noise level of 70 CNEL. To achieve the recommended 50 CNEL standard for offices, the buildings will need to achieve 20 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise attenuation. This is achieved by typical construction with closed windows. Commercial buildings typically include HVAC systems that satisfy the UBC ventilation requirements. To achieve the recommended 55 CNEL standard for retail uses the buildings will only need to achieve 14 dB of noise attenuation. This is achievable with windows closed. New residential development along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, Plaza Boulevard and Roosevelt Avenue will require noise assessments to be prepared prior to issuance of building permits to ensure that they meet the 65 CNEL outdoor and 45 CNEL indoor noise standards. Commercial uses located within the freeway 70 CNEL contour will need more than 20 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction to meet the noise standards. Noise assessments will be required for those uses proposed within the I-5 70 CNEL contour line prior to issuance of building peiurits to ensure that they meet the appropriate noise standards. Commercial uses outside of the I-5 70 CNEL contour will only need standard ventilation to meet the 55 CNEL interior standard for retail uses and 50 CNEL interior standard for office uses. These uses are not significantly impacted by noise. On -Site Activities Noise impacts to residential areas typically occur only where the residential areas directly abut commercial areas. The majority of the proposed commercial uses are located away from proposed residences. However, the project proposes several mixed -use areas. The sources of noise from commercial portions of mixed uses that have the potential to impact residential uses include parking lot activity, mechanical equipment, and delivery trucks/loading docks. In addition, specific uses in the mixed -use portions of the project not yet identified area could generate significant noise levels. Restaurants, nightclubs, and bars are often sources of noise issues due to their late night operation. In any case, all of the commercial uses will need to comply with the City of National City Noise Ordinance. Typically this will only be a concem at the commercial portions of the mixed -use sites located directly adjacent to residential uses. It is possible that some uses in the commercial areas will exceed the Noise Ordinance. Conclusion The development of projects consistent with the Specific Plan could increase noise levels in the project vicinity due to traffic and mechanical equipment that exceed City adopted noise levels and have significant noise impacts to residential uses. The development of future projects could increase both short-teuu (construction) and long-term (operational) noise levels beyond City standards. The increased noise levels could impact noise sensitive land uses (residential). Potential noise impacts could include both interior and exterior noise levels impacts as well as increasing the ambient, or background noise levels beyond City acceptable limits. Because specific development plans of future projects are not available at this time it is speculative to National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIK September 2004 Page 97 determine project specific noise impacts, including short or long-term impacts. The City will review all future projects for potential noise impacts at the time plans are submitted for approval. When applicable, noise studies will be required to determine whether or not a project will have noise impacts as determined by the City's Noise Control Ordinance. Mitigation measures to reduce noise impacts will be imposed on projects when applicable to meet the noise ordinance and reduce noise impacts to a level of insignificance to comply with CEQA. Based on the threshold criteria the Specific Plan could have significant noise impacts with future development in the Project Area. 4.5.3 Mitigation Measures Upon evaluation of specific projects by the City, if potential significant noise impacts are anticipated the following measure shall be implemented where appropriate: Temporary Impacts 1. To ensure that construction activities comply with the City's Noise Ordinance a Construction Noise Abatement Plan shall be prepared for each construction project and submitted to the City prior to the issuance of demolition, grading or building permits, whichever is issued first. The Plan shall describe the construction activities, equipment required for those activities, and noise level generation characteristics of the equipment to be used. Noise levels at the closest residential use shall be predicted. If projected noise levels will exceed the Noise Ordinance limits, measures to reduce those levels to comply with the Noise Ordinance shall be described and implemented. Long Term Off -Site Impacts The analysis shows that the project will result in a significant traffic noise impact to residences along Civic Center between Wilson Avenue and Roosevelt Avenue. Further, the project will substantially contribute to significant cumulative traffic noise impacts along D Avenue between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard, and Plaza Boulevard between Hoover Avenue and D Avenue. Typically sound walls are prescribed to mitigate these impacts. However, in this case, most of the impacted residences front the roadway causing the traffic noise. Building barriers in front of homes is not practical or consistent with the aesthetics and design of the specific plan. Openings would be required to allow access to the streets, which would short-circuit the effectiveness of the noise barriers. The tires interacting with the roadway generate much of the noise generated by traffic. A freshly paved roadway will generally generate substantially lower noise levels than an older worn roadway. However, the reduction in noise levels erodes rather quickly as the new surface is worn. Typically the reduction is completely eliminated within a year. In recent years "low noise" roadway surfaces have been used with success more and more. These surfaces result in lower traffic noise levels than typical roadway surfaces. The question that has lingered is how long the noise reduction qualities exist. Several long-term tests are currently ongoing and indicate that the noise reduction does in fact last over time. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 98 l The two surfaces most commonly used for their noise reducing qualities are open -graded friction courses (OGFC) and rubberized asphalt. Studies have shown that these surfaces can reduce traffic noise levels by 5 to 10 dB at highway speeds. At lower speeds, the reductions are estimated to be in the 3 to 5 dB range. Use of one of these surfaces on the roadways causing the impacts would almost completely eliminate the projected noise level increases due to the project as well as the cumulative increases. To mitigate the significant noise impact caused by increased traffic generated by the project, the following roadway segments should be repaved using OGFC, rubberized asphalt or other roadway surface showing documented long term noise reductions of at least 3 dB; Civic Center between Wilson Avenue and Roosevelt Avenue, D Avenue between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard, and Plaza Boulevard between Hoover Avenue and D Avenue. In order to reduce vehicular road noise the following mitigation measure is recommended: 2. These roads (Civic Center between Wilson Avenue and Roosevelt Avenue, D Avenue between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard, and Plaza Boulevard between Hoover Avenue and D Avenue) shall be repaved with the noise reducing surfaces prior to issuance of building permits for the specific project that will result in, cumulatively, more than half of the projected increase in trips resulting from the implementation of the specific plan. Long Term Impacts from On -Site Activities The following long-term noise mitigation measure is recommended: 3. As specific commercial projects are submitted for approval they shall be evaluated for noise generating characteristics, the closeness to any residential uses, and the potential for violations of the City's Noise Ordinance. If City staff determines that a proposed commercial project has the potential to violate the City's Noise Ordinance, a detailed noise assessment shall be required. This assessment shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical engineer and describe the noise generating activities and their characteristics as a noise source. Noise levels shall be predicted at the potentially impacted residences and compared with the Noise Ordinance standards. If an exceedance is found, project specific mitigation measures shall be described to reduce the noise levels to below the Noise Ordinance Standards. The noise report shall be submitted to and approved by the City and all mitigation measure incorporated into the building plans prior to issuance of building permits for the project. Long Term On -Site Impacts The noise analysis presents evidence that the residential uses along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, and Plaza Boulevard would be exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. Further, indoor noise levels along these roadways and Roosevelt Avenue could be exposed to interior noise levels in excess of 45 CNEL unless properly designed. The noise mitigation measures recommended below will allow development to meet the indoor and outdoor noise level limits of the city. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 99 Outdoor Noise Mitigation of a rm, r 3. Mitigation through the design the most efficientnmethod noise of reducing outdoor noise combination wall/berm)g exposure levels. The effect of a noise barrier is critically dependent on the geometry between the noise source and the receiver. A noise barrier effect occurs when the barrier breaks the "line of sight" between the source and receiver. The greater the distance the sound must travel around the barrier to reach the receiver, the greater the noise reduction of the barrier. To be effective noise barriers are required to have a surface density of at least 3.5 pounds per square foot with no openings or cracks. It may be a solid wall, an earthen berm, or a combination of the two. The wall may be constructed of wood studs with stucco exterior, 1/4-inch plate glass, 5/8 inch Plexiglas, any masonry material, or a combination of these materials. Wood and other materials may be acceptable if properly designed as a noise barrier. For patios and balconies the barriers must run along the entire edge of the patio or balcony from building face to building face. Based on the projected traffic noise levels, no residential area would require a barrier with a height greater than 9 feet to reduce noise levels to below 65 CNEL. Typically 5 to 6 foot high barriers will adequately reduce traffic noise levels within the specific plan boundary. However, as no specific projects are proposed the specific locations of any private outdoor living areas are not known. Additionally, final grading plans are required to determine the final barrier heights and ensure compliance with the appropriate standard. The above analysis shows that this standard is achievable with feasible barrier heights. To ensure that residential projects proposed for the project area achieve the 65 CNEL standard, City Staff shall review the preliminary designs to determine if any private outdoor living areas are potentially exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL. Prior to the issuance of grading permits for any residential area with outdoor living areas potentially exposed to noise levels in excess of 65 CNEL, as determined by the City, a detailed acoustical study shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant and submitted to the City. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the area and the measures required to meet the 65 CNEL exterior residential noise standard. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the grading and building plans, as appropriate. Indoor Noise Mitigation 4. New residential uses within the project area will be exposed to noise levels no higher than 76 CNEL. This means that the building structures will need to achieve up to 31 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction. This level of noise reduction is achievable, but will likely require substantial building upgrades. Most residential uses will not be exposed to noise levels in excess of 69 CNEL, which will require up to a 24 dB outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction. In some cases standard construction will achieve National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 100 1 L 1 this level of reduction, however, residences along major roadways may require upgraded windows to achieve the required outdoor to indoor noise reduction. With typical residential construction at least 20 dB of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction is achieved with windows closed. With windows open outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction falls to 12 dBA. Therefore, units requiring more than 12 dB of noise reduction require adequate ventilation .per the Uniform Building Code to allow windows to remain closed. Typically this is provided through mechanical ventilation. Windows do not need to be sealed shut, but closeable at the occupants' discretion. Units along National City Boulevard, 8`h Street, Plaza Boulevard, and Roosevelt Avenue will require more than 12 dB of noise reduction and mechanical ventilation. With extensive building upgrades, outdoor -to -indoor noise reductions of up to 32 dB can be achieved. All residences require 32 dB or less of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction. Therefore, the homes in the project will be able to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standards. Architectural drawings for the homes are not currently available to analyze the actual noise reduction achieved. Prior to issuance of building permits for residential units located along National City Boulevard, 8th Street, Plaza Boulevard, and Roosevelt Avenue, a detailed acoustical study shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant and submitted to the City. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the building(s) and the measures required to meet the 45 CNEL interior noise standard. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the building plans. Commercial uses located within the 70 CNEL contour from the 1-5 Freeway will require up to 26 dBA of outdoor -to -indoor noise reduction to meet the 50 CNEL office interior noise standard. Prior to issuance of building permits for commercial projects units located within the 70 CNEL I-5 Freeway noise contour as shown in Exhibit 6, a detailed acoustical study shall be prepared by a qualified acoustical consultant and submitted to the City. This report shall describe and quantify the noise sources impacting the building(s) and the measures required to meet the 50 CNEL office and/or 55 CNEL retail interior noise standards. The measures described in the report shall be incorporated into the building plans. 4.5.4 Significance After Mitigation Repaving the roadways with specialized surfaces to reduce traffic noise levels is the only practical way to eliminate the noise impacts from increased traffic generated by the project. While the repaving of the roadway segments where significant project and cumulative noise impacts are projected is expected to eliminate the traffic noise level increases experienced at the affected residences, there is some uncertainty in exactly how much noise reduction will be experienced and how long that reduction will exist. Because of this uncertainty and the lack of other methods to mitigate the impacts, the significant project and cumulative off -site traffic noise impacts are considered unavoidable. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 101 This page intentionally left blank (11 11 11 11 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 4.6 AIR QUALITY 4.6.1 Existing Conditions This report analyzes the potential air quality impacts associated with the National City Downtown Specific Plan. Katz, Okitzu & Associates, provided traffic volume and generation information used in this report to project air quality emissions. The proposed project site is in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) and thus is subject to a review with respect to the San Diego Air Pollution Control District's (SDAPCD) Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). See Mestre Greve Air Quality Study — Appendix E. Climate The climate in and around the Project Area, as with all of Southern California, is controlled largely by the strength and position of the subtropical high-pressure cell over the Pacific Ocean. It maintains moderate temperatures and comfortable humidity's, and limits precipitation to a few storms during the winter "wet" season. Temperatures are normally mild, excepting the summer months, which commonly bring substantially higher temperatures during the summer months. In all portions of the basin, temperatures well above 100 degrees F. have been recorded in recent years. The annual average temperature in the basin is approximately 62 degrees F. Winds are almost always driven by the dominant land/sea breeze circulation system. Regional wind patterns are dominated by daytime on -shore sea breezes. At night the wind generally slows and reverses direction traveling towards the sea. Local canyons, with wind tending to flow parallel to the canyons, will alter wind direction. During the transition period from one wind pattern to the other, the dominant wind direction rotates into the south and causes a minor wind direction maximum from the south. The frequency of calm winds (less than 2 miles per hour) is less than 10 percent. Therefore, there is little stagnation in the project vicinity, especially during busy daytime traffic hours. Southern California frequently has temperature inversions, which inhibit the dispersion of pollutants. Inversions may be either ground based or elevated. Ground based inversions, sometimes referred to as radiation inversions are most severe during clear, cold, early winter mornings. Under conditions of a ground -based inversion, very little mixing or turbulence occurs, and high concentrations of primary pollutants may occur local to major roadways. Elevated inversions can be generated by a variety of meteorological phenomena. Elevated inversions act as a lid or upper boundary and restrict vertical mixing. Below the elevated inversion dispersion is not restricted. Mixing heights for elevated inversions are lower in the summer and more persistent. This low summer inversion puts a lid over the SDAB and is responsible for the high levels of ozone observed during summer months in the air basin. Air Quality Management The Project Area is located in the San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) and, jurisdictionally, is the responsibility of the San Diego Air Pollution Control District (SDAPCD) and to a lesser extent, National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 102 the California Air Resources Board (CARE). The SDAPCD sets and enforces regulations for stationary sources in the basin and develops and implements Transportation Control Measures. The CARB is charged with controlling motor vehicle emissions. CARB establishes legal emission rates for new vehicles and is responsible for the vehicle inspection program. Other significant agencies in the air quality management for the basin include the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG). The EPA implements the provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. This Act establishes ambient air quality standards that are applicable nationwide. In areas that are not achieving the standards the Clean Air Act requires that plans be developed and implemented to meet the standards. The EPA oversees the efforts in this air basin and insures that appropriate plans are being developed and implemented. The primary agencies responsible for writing the plan are SANDAG and the SDAPCD. The SDAPCD is the agency responsible for protecting the public health and welfare through the administration of federal and state air quality laws, regulations and policies. Included in the SDAPCD's tasks are the monitoring of air pollution, the preparation of the State Implementation Plan (SIP), and the promulgation of Rules and Regulations. The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) requires areas that have not attained State ambient air quality standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, or nitrogen dioxide to prepare plans to attain the standards by the earliest practicable date no ahof a runese sf atde rdse a has bie t been designated by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) as air quality standard for ozone. Accordingly, the San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) was developed pursuant to CCAA requirements and identifies feasible emission control measures to provide expeditious progress in San Diego County toward attaining the State ozone standard. The RAQS was initially adopted by the San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board on June 30, 1992, and amended on March 2, 1993, in response to ARB comments. The District Board further updated the RAQS with triennial revisions on December 12, 1995; June 17, 1998; and August 8, 2001. The latest revision to the RAQS was published on July 28, 2004. The San Diego Air Basin (SDAB), which is contiguous with San Diego County, is currently classified by the U.S. EPA as an attainment area for all pollutants except particulate matters (PM10). SDAB was recently redesignated from non -attainment to attainment for ozone on July 28, 2004. For PM10, SDAB is designated as Unclassifiable because at the time of designation there was not enough monitoring data available to show the area was in attainment. Prior to 2003, the federal PM10 standards had not been violated in SDAB. The 24-hour standard was violated during the October 2003 fires. SDAB is designateder sstandards non attainment for the State ozone and PM10 standards and attainment In 1997, the EPA established an 8-hour standard for ozone and standards for particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5). In 1999, a federal court ruling (American r oking Associations, Inc., et al., v. United States Environmental Protection Agency) cke implementation of these standards. In February 2001, the United States Supreme Court upheld the standards, but remanded some issues back to the Circuit Court. In March 2002, the Circuit Court upheld the standards. Establishment of a PM2.5 standard was just the first step in the assessment and reduction of PM2.5 levels. Tools need to be developed to accurately estimate PM2.5 and precursor emissions, their dispersion and atmospheric interactions, and the resulting September 2004 Page 103 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR 1 1 11 1 1 L_ C c concentrations. Uncertainty brought by the court challenge delayed development of the tools to estimate PM2.5 emissions and concentrations, especially at a project level. The focus at this time is establishment of a PM2.5 measurement network to determine which areas are in attainment of the standard and which are not and how substantial the concentrations are in areas of nonattainment. At this time, adequate tools are not available to perform a detailed assessment of PM2.5 emissions and impacts at the project level. Further, there are no good sources for the significance thresholds for PM2.5 emissions. Until tools and methodologies are developed to assess the impacts of projects on PM2.5 concentrations the analysis of PM10 will need to be used as an indicator of potential PM2.5 impacts. EPA announced air quality designations for the new 8-hour ozone standard on April 15, 2004. The SDAB was designated as non -attainment. The SDAPCD now has until April 2007 to submit a plan showing measures to reduce 8-hour ozone levels to below the federal standard by June 15, 2009. Per the request of the EPA, on February 11, 2004 CARB submitted a recommendation that SDAB be designated as non -attainment based on PM2.5 monitoring from 2000 through 2002. On June 29, 2004 EPA indicated its concurrence with this recommendation EPA is scheduled to promulgate final air quality designations for the new PM2.5 standard by December 15, 2004. After the final designation is made the SDAPCD will have three years to submit a plan showing measures to meet the PM2.5 standards. On June 20, 2002, the CARB revised the PM10 annual average standard to 20 µg/m3 and establish an annual average standard for PM25 of 12 µg/m3. These standards were approved by the Office of Administrative Law in June of 2003 and are now effective. However, as discussed above there are not adequate tools to assess PM2'5 impacts and PM10 emissions must be used as an indicator of potential PM2.5 impacts. SDAPCD has not altered the recommended significance thresholds or analysis techniques based on these revised standards. Monitored Air Quality Air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Estimates for the SDAB have been made for existing emissions ("Air Quality in San Diego - 2001 Attainment"). The data indicate that mobile sources are the major source of regional emissions. Motor vehicle emissions (i.e., on -road mobile sources) account for approximately 55 percent of the ozone precursors. They are volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOx). Off -road sources such as utility engines, construction and farm equipment, ships, planes, trains, and off -highway motorcycles are also significant sources. The Project Area is closest to the SDAPCD's Chula Vista monitoring station. The data collected at this station is considered to be representative of the air quality experienced in the vicinity of the Project Area. The monitored air quality data at Chula Vista includes for ozone (03), particulates (PM10 and PM2 '), carbon monoxide (CO), NOx, and Sulfur Oxides (SOx). The air quality data for 2000 through 2003 from the Chula Vista monitoring station are presented in National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 104 Table 16, Air Quality Levels Measured at the Chula Vista Monitoring Station. Table 16 also presents the Federal and State air quality standards. Table 16 Air Quality Levels Measured at the Chula Vista Monitoring Station California National Max. Days State Std. Days National Std. Pollutant Standard Standard Year % Msrd.' Level Exceeded4 Exceeded' Ozone 0.09 ppm 0.12 ppm 2003 96 0.075 0 0 (1 hour) for 1 hour for 1 hour 2002 100 0.115 1 0 2001 99 0.102 2 0 2000 99 0.091 0 0 Ozone None 0.08 ppm 2003 96 0.056 N/A 0 (8 hour) for 8 hours for 8 hours 2002 100 0.073 N/A 0 2001 99 0.079 N/A 0 2000 99 0.077 N/A 0 CO 20 ppm 35 ppm 2003 96 6.9 0 0 (I hour) for 1 hour for 1 hour 2002 100 4.3 0 0 2001 99 5.6 0 0 2000 99 5.8 0 0 CO 9.0 ppm 9 ppm 2003 97 5.4 0 0 (8 hour) for 8 hour for 8 hour 2002 98 2.6 0 0 2001 98 4.6 0 0 2000 98 3.4 0 0 Particulates 50 ug/m3 150 ug/m3 2003 97 78 2/12 0/0 PM'0 for 24 hr. for 24 hr. 2002 96 52 1/6 0/1 (24 Hour) 2001 100 66 2/12 0/2 2000 90 54 1/6 0/3 Particulates 30 ug/m3 50 ug/m3 2003 97 28/27 No No PM105 AGM3 AAM2 2002 96 27/27 No No (Annual) 2001 100 29/27 No No 2000 90 --/-- No No Particulates None 65 ug/m3 2003 100 41 N/A 0 PM2.5 for 24 hr. 2002 97 41 N/A 0 (24 Hour) 2001 98 41 N/A 0 2000 89 41 N/A 0 Particulates 12 ug/m3 15 ug/m3 2003 100 14.4 Yes No PM2.5 AAM2 AAM2 2002 97 13.9 Yes No (Annual) 2001 98 15.5 Yes Yes 2000 89 13.1 Yes No NO2 0.25 PPM None 2003 99 0.102 0 N/A (1-Hour) for 1 hour 2002 99 0.093 0 N/A 2001 97 0.071 0 N/A 2000 98 0.072 0 N/A NO2 None 0.053 ppm 2003 99 0.018 N/A No (AAM2) AAM2 2002 99 0.018 N/A No 2001 97 0.017 N/A No National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 105 1 L California National Max. Pollutant Standard Standard Year % Msrd.1 Level 2000 98 0.017 SO2 0.04 ppm 0.14 ppm 2003 97 0.011 (24 Hour) 24 Hr. for 24 hr. 2002 97 0.012 2001 99 0.015 2000 96 0.012 SO2 None 0.030 ppm 2003 97 (AAM2) AAM2 2002 99 2001 96 2000 96 1. Percent of year where high pollutant levels were expected 2. Annual Arithmetic Mean 3. Annual Geometric Mean 4. For Annual Average Yes or No is listed to indicate if the particulates measurements are not performed every day. columns are the actual number of days measured that state number of days the standard will be expected to be exceeded 5. Levels Shown for Annual PM10 are AGM/AAM 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.003 Days State Std. Days National Std. Exceeded' Exceeded' N/A No 0 0 0 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A that measurements were made 0 0 0 0 No No No No annual average exceeded the standard for the year. For The first number shown in Days Standard Exceeded standard was exceeded. The second number shows the if measurements were taken every day. The monitoring data presented in Table 16 shows that ozone and particulates are the air pollutants of primary concern in the Project Area. The state ozone standard was exceeded 1 day in 2002, and 2 days in 2001. There were no exceedances in 2000 and 2003. The federal standard was not exceeded in the last three years. There does not appear to be any trend toward lower ozone concentrations or number of days exceeding the state and federal ozone standards. Ozone is a secondary pollutant; it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of the SDAPCD contribute to the ozone levels experienced at the monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly upwind. The state standards for PM10 have been exceeded at the Chula Vista monitoring station between 6 and 12 days over the past three years. There does not appear to be any trend toward fewer days of exceedences or lower concentrations. PM1° levels in the area are due to natural sources, grading operations and motor vehicles. According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particles (PM10). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles. People with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM1°. Other groups considered sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are also considered sensitive, because many breathe through their mouths. Carbon monoxide (CO) is another important pollutant that is due mainly to motor vehicles. Currently, CO levels in the project region are in compliance with the state and federal 1-hour and National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 106 8-hour standards. High levels of CO commonly occur near major roadways and freeways. CO may potentially be a problem in the future for areas next to freeways and other major roadways. The data for the Chula Vista station show that the CO standards have not been exceeded in the last year that data is available. Future CO emissions will improve as cars continue to get cleaner. The monitored data shown in Table 16 shows that other than the ozone exceedences as mentioned above, no state or federal standards were exceeded for the remaining criteria pollutants. Local Air Quality Local air quality is a major concern along roadways. Carbon monoxide is a primary pollutant. Unlike ozone, carbon monoxide is directly emitted from a variety of sources. The most notable source of carbon monoxide is motor vehicles. For this reason, carbon monoxide concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used to assess its impacts on the local air quality. Comparisons of levels with state and federal carbon monoxide standards indicate the severity of the existing concentrations for receptors in the project area. The Federal and State standards for carbon monoxide are presented in Table 17, Federal and State Carbon Monoxide Standards. Table 17 Federal and State Carbon Monoxide Standards Averaging Time Standard Federal State 1 hour 8 hours 1 hour 8 hours 35 ppm 9 ppm 20 ppm 9 ppm Existing CO Modeling Results Carbon monoxide levels in the project vicinity due to nearby roadways were assessed with the CALINE4 computer model. CALINE4 is a fourth generation line source air quality model developed by the California Department of Transportation ("CALINE4," Report No. FHWA/CA/TL-84/15, June 1989). The existing traffic data was obtained from the traffic study. PM peak hour traffic data were utilized in the CALINE4 CO modeling to represent the worst -case scenario. The composite emission factors were taken from EMFAC2002. EMFAC2002 is a computer model that calculates vehicular emission factors published by CARB. CALINE4 modeling was conducted for the three intersections. The worst case -intersections were selected which have the highest traffic or the most traffic increase that is adjacent to sensitive land uses. The three intersections selected are National City Boulevard at 8th Street, National City Boulevard at Plaza Boulevard, and 8th Street at Roosevelt Avenue. The CO modeling was assessed for four receptors at each corner of these intersections. The receptor locations are located approximately 25 feet from the corner of these intersections. The receptor National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 107 iT l r: 1, c locations are shown in Figure 19, CO Receptor Locations. Concentration estimates include emissions from traffic on the I-5 Freeway. The existing (2004) background CO concentrations were estimated using the average of the maximum measured CO concentration for the last five years. The nearest available CO background data for the project area is the Chula Vista monitoring station. The average CO background data at the Chula Vista monitoring station in the last five years are 5.6 ppm for 1- hour and 3.8 ppm for 8-hour. Therefore, 5.6 ppm is added to the worst -case meteorological 1- hour projections, and 3.8 ppm to the 8-hour projections, to account for the existing background carbon monoxide levels. The 8-hour CO concentration is estimated utilizing a persistence factor of 0.8. The modeling results of the existing CO levels are presented in Table 18, Existing Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm). Table 18 Existing Carbon Monoxide Concentrations (ppm) Worst Case CO Concentration (ppm) Receptor 1 Hour 8 Hour 1. National City Boulevard at 8th Street 9.0 6.5 2. National City Boulevard at Plaza Boulevard 8.9 6.4 3. Roosevelt Ave. at 8n Street 11.2 8.3 State Standard 20.0 9.0 Number of Exceedances 0 0 NOTE: The CO concentrations include the ambient concentrations of 5.6 ppm for 1-hour levels, and 3.8 ppm for 8-hour levels. Table 18 presents the modeling results for the existing CO concentrations at the three -receptor locations. The existing CO concentrations are estimated to be between 8.9 and 11.2 ppm for the 1-hour averaging time and 6.4 to 8.5 ppm for 8-hour averaging time. The data indicate that the existing CO concentrations in the vicinity of the project site currently comply with the 1-hour and 8-hour state and federal standards. 4.6.2 Project Impacts Air quality impacts are usually divided into short term and long term. Short-term impacts are usually the result of construction or grading operations. Long-term impacts are associated with the build out condition of the proposed Specific Plan. Thresholds of Significance Rule 20 (Regulation II) of the SDAPCD contains significance thresholds for new or modified stationary source emissions. Table 20 presents these significance thresholds. Any new or modified stationary emission source, which has the potential to emit 10 pounds per day or more of PM10, NOx, VOC and SOx, shall be equipped with BACT for each such air contaminant. The SDAPCD standards are more restrictive than the Federal Conformity Rule approved by the EPA (adopted in SDAPCD's Rule 1501). Table 19, Regional Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance also presents these thresholds. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 108 This page intentionally left blank 1 .41,11' 1M. !'+..-.1 +ri1441•+.74 err 3 *ow. umasnion ♦w 1'wi AMR _t• 111.M1 4. 1.4,4 `OM.A aE1 111k Y+or *Mort L`ML^Ad! gt'40l.'-b 1•14.,4 .ra. :.. �Yalk+a. 1.••.s4. r 4 �`4 4 100w1' 44 -�" is TM 1A4[ 'N!! 44 MOM M. *4 • -R • 1*! — Specific Plan Boundary * Nose Measurement location Source: Mestre Greve Associates 1 Figure 19 Specific Plan Area CO Receptor Locations Table 19 Regional Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance CO ROG Nox PM10 SOx SDAPCD Thresholds lbs/day tons/year Clean Air Act Thresholds tons/year 550 100 250 100 250 40 15 40 100 50 50 100 100 For the purpose of assessing air quality impacts, the Specific Plan will result in a significant impact to air quality if it will: • conflict or obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan; • exceed regional pollutant emission thresholds published by SDAPCD; • violate any air quality standard or contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation; • result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors); • expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; and/or • create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. In the event that the emissions exceed the established thresholds, air dispersion modeling may be conducted to assess whether the proposed action results in an exceedance of an air quality standard. Short Term Impacts Construction Air Pollutant Emissions The build out of the Specific Plan will result in short term construction emissions. Temporary impacts can be determined based on each approved project. Air pollutants will be emitted by construction equipment and fugitive dust will be generated during grading of the site. The predominant emissions from construction equipment will be NOx. Construction equipment will consist of haul trucks, graders, dozers and other heavy construction equipment, crew commuting trips, miscellaneous vehicles, and ancillary equipment. The pollutant emissions due to grading activities will be primarily PM1 0. The dust emission due to grading is very localized. Dust generated by such activities usually becomes more of a local nuisance than a serious health problem. In some cases grading may be near existing development. Care should be taken to minimize the generation of dust. Common practice for minimizing dust generation is watering before and during grading. If water or other soil stabilizers are used to control dust, the emissions can be reduced by 50 percent. Peak periods of grading and demolition will result in the greatest levels of air pollution emissions. Typically, if pollutants generated during grading activities do not exceed the SDAPCD thresholds then none of the construction activities will as well. Emissions greater than National City Downtown Specific Plan Program FIR September 2004 Page 110 the SDAPCD significance thresholds (Table 19) should be considered significant and mitigation measures should be required. The build out of the Specific Plan will result in short term construction emissions. The construction emissions are dependent on each individual project. Construction emissions for each project can be determined at the time they are submitted to the city for approval based on specific project information such as the grading area, the quantity of earthwork moved, the duration of the construction period, equipment size, type and number. Estimated construction related air emissions will have to be conducted for individual projects at the time they are submitted to the city for approval. Diesel Exhaust Toxics From Construction Equipment In recent years the carcinogenic components of diesel exhaust have become a serious issue. However, impacts from toxic substances related to cumulative exposure and are typically assessed over a 70-year period. Diesel exhaust emissions are typically generated by a considerable number truck trips. Demolition, when the peak diesel exhaust emissions typically occur, is not expected take more than a few days to complete for most projects, and the complete construction of each individual project is not expected to take more than a year. Because of the relatively short duration of construction, diesel emissions resulting from the construction are not expected to result in a significant impact. The proposed land uses in the Specific Plan are mainly residential with some commercial, office, and light industrial land uses. Therefore, there is no reason to believe that the proposed land uses will generate a substantial amount of diesel exhaust emissions. Long Tenn Impacts - Local Air Quality Because the build out of the Specific Plan will introduce changes in traffic on the roadways, a detailed analysis of carbon monoxide concentrations at sensitive areas in the City vicinity was conducted. Methodology Carbon monoxide (CO) is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of carbon monoxide is motor vehicles. For this reason carbon monoxide concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network, and are used as an indicator of its impacts on local air quality. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future carbon monoxide levels with State and Federal carbon monoxide standards moreover by comparing future CO concentrations with and without the project. The Federal and State standards for carbon monoxide were presented earlier in Table 18. Future carbon monoxide concentrations with the project were forecasted with the CALINE4 computer model. CALINE4 is a fourth generation line source air quality model developed by the California Department of Transportation ("CALINE4," Report No. FHWA/CAITL-84/15, June 1989). The purpose of the model is to forecast air quality impacts near transportation facilities in C B E National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 111 1 what is known as the micro scale region. The micro scale region encompasses the region of a few thousand feet around the pollutant source. Given source strength, meteorology, site geometry, and site characteristics, the model can reliably predict pollutant concentrations. Worst -case meteorology was assessed. Specifically, a late afternoon winter period with a ground -based inversion was considered. For worst -case meteorological conditions, a wind speed of 0.5 meter per second (1 mph) and a stability class G was utilized for a 1 hour averaging time. Stability class G is the worst -case scenario for the most turbulent atmospheric conditions. The higher stability class promotes dispersion of pollutants. The CALINE4 Model determined a worst -case wind direction for each site. A sigma theta of 10 degrees was also used and represents the fluctuation of wind direction. A high sigma theta number will represent a very changeable wind direction. The temperature used for worst case was 50 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature affects the dispersion pattern and emission rates of the motor vehicles. The temperature represents the January mean minimum temperature as reported by Caltrans. The wind speed, stability class, sigma theta, and temperature data used for the modeling are those recommended in the "Development of Worst Case Meteorology Criteria," (California Department of Transportation, June 1989). A mixing height of 1,000 meters was used as recommended in the CALINE4 Manual. A surface roughness of the ground in the area, 100 centimeters, was utilized and is based on the CALINE4 Manual. It should be noted that the results are also dependent on the speeds of the vehicles utilized in the model. Composite emission factors utilized with the CALINE4 computer model were derived from EMFAC2002. EMFAC2002 is a computer model that calculates vehicular emission factors published by CARB. The traffic data used in the CALINE4 CO computer modeling were obtained from the traffic consultant, Katz, Okitsu & Associates. The peak hour volumes and the level -of -service data at the critical intersections were used in the CALINE4 computer modeling. The level -of -service data are important in the CALINE4 computer modeling in that they determine the speeds and the emission factors. The lower the speeds, the higher the emission factors, hence, the higher the CO results. The p.m. peak hour traffic is utilized in the CALINE4 computer modeling as a worst -case scenario. Eight -hour carbon monoxide levels were projected using Caltrans methodology described in their "Air Quality Technical Analysis Notes." The method essentially uses a persistence factor, which is multiplied times the 1-hour emission projections. The projected 8-hour ambient concentration is then added to the product. The persistence factor can be estimated using the highest ratio of 8-hour to 1-hour second annual maximum carbon monoxide concentrations from the most recent three years that data is available. For the project, a persistence factor of 0.8 was utilized for the freeway. Generally, the 1-hour CO level is considered the peak maximum CO level since it is the highest CO measured for an hour. According to the Caltrans Air Quality Technical Analysis Notes, changes in meteorology and traffic over time disperse the CO concentration levels and cause it to be less severe. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the 1-hour CO levels will persist for a full eight hours. As a result, a 1-hour CO level is generally considered to be the peak level and is usually higher than an 8-hour CO level. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 112 The future CALINE4 modeling was conducted for two intersections. The worst -case intersections were selected that are adjacent to sensitive land uses. These worst -case intersections have the highest peak traffic or the greatest traffic increase due to the project. These intersections are National City Boulevard at 8`h Street and National City Boulevard at Plaza Boulevard. The CO modeling was assessed for two receptors as shown previously. The modeling included emissions from traffic on the I-5 freeway. The future ambient (background) concentration levels for CO are not available. Therefore, for this report the background levels for year 2030 is assumed to be the same as existing year 2004. This can be considered as the worst -case situation since the background levels are anticipated to decrease in future years due to cleaner car engines. Carbon Monoxide (CO) Modeling Results The results of the CALINE4 CO modeling are summarized in Table 21 and are for year 2030. The CO modeling results are shown for the projected future 1-hour and 8-hour CO concentration levels. The pollutant levels are expressed in parts per million (ppm) for each receptor. The carbon monoxide levels reported in Table 20, Worst Case Projections of Carbon Monoxide Concentrations are composites of the background levels of carbon monoxide coming into the area plus those generated by the local roadways. Table 20 Worst Case Projections of Carbon Monoxide Concentrations Receptor 1. National City Blvd at 8th Street 2. National City Drive at Plaza Boulevard 3. Roosevelt Ave at 8th Street Worst Case CO Concentration (ppm) 1 Hour Average 8 Hour Average Future No Future With Future No Future With Existing Project Project Existing Project Project 9.0 6.3 6.7 6.5 4.4 8.9 6.3 6.8 6.4 4.4 11.2 6.9 7.2 8.3 4.8 State Standard 20 20 20 9 9 Number of Exceedances 0 0 0 0 0 0 NOTE: The CO concentrations include the ambient concentrations of 5.6 ppm for 1-hour levels, and 3.1 ppm for 8-hour levels. 4.7 4.8 5.1 9 Table 20 shows that future emissions with and without the project are not projected to exceed the State standard. With the project, 1-hour average concentrations range between 6.7 and 7.2 ppm. The 8-hour concentrations range between 4.7 and 5.1 ppm. The table shows that the project causes a 0.5-ppm increase over the no project conditions. This increase is not significant. Because the future with project concentrations is projected to be less than the State standards the project will not result in a significant impact. Comparing the future modeled CO concentrations with the existing CO levels shows that the future CO concentration levels will be lower than the existing CO levels. The future CO concentration levels for both future scenarios will be reduced by between 2.3 and 4.0 ppm for the 1-hour averaging period and 1.8 to 3.2 ppm for 8-hour averaging time. This is mainly due to the anticipated decrease in the vehicular emission factors in the future demonstrated in the emission National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 113 11 1 1 1 L 1 c factors obtained from CARB's EMFAC2002 model. In general, the background CO concentration and the emission factors are projected to decrease steadily in the future years due to cleaner vehicle engines. While the local traffic volumes increase, the emission is more than offset by the decrease of background levels and emission factors. This is indicative of diminished automobile emissions as cleaner engines come into operation. Long Term Regional Air Quality The primary source of regional emissions generated by the build out of the Specific Plan will be from motor vehicles. Emissions will also be generated from the combustion of natural gas for space heating and the generation of electricity associated with the proposed land uses. However, the pollutant emissions will be minor compared to emissions from motor vehicles. The pollutant emissions due to motor vehicles will be primarily CO while the rest of the criterion pollutants will be secondary. The emission factors from EMFAC2000 were used to calculate the vehicular emissions. EMFAC2000 is a computer model published by the CARB that calculates vehicular emission factors. The EMFAC2000 emission factors, at an average speed of 25 miles per hour were used in the estimates. The data used to estimate the on -site combustion of natural gas, and off -site electrical usage are based on the proposed land uses in terms of dwelling units and square footages, and emission factors obtained from the SCAQMD's 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook. The build out of the General Plan is projected generate a total of 24,175 total daily trips. The average trip length data were taken from the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality Handbook (Table A9-5-D). The average trip lengths are based on the regional averages within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) area and are representative of all urban Southern California. The trip lengths used are 11.7 miles for work trips and 6.9 miles for non -work trips. The average trip length for the work trips was applied to all commercial, office, and other non-residential land uses while the average trip length for non -work trips will be applied to all residential land uses. The product of the daily trip and the average trip length translate to the total vehicle miles traveled (VMT). This results in an average trip length of 11.45 miles and 276,704 daily vehicle miles traveled based on development consistent with the current General Plan land uses for the Project Area. The Specific Plan is projected to generate 63,005 daily trips. Estimating the trip length with the methodology described above results in an average trip length of 10.48 miles and 660,218 vehicle miles traveled and an average speed of 25 miles per hour were assumed. The total emissions from activity associated with the Specific Plan area for the current General Plan and the proposed Specific Plan are presented in Tables 21, Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Under Current General Plan and 22, Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Under Proposed Specific Plan, respectively. The total emissions are presented in pounds per day (lbs/day) and represent emissions for the build out year, 2030. 12 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 114 Table 21 Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Under Current General Plan Source Vehicular Emissions Natural Gas Consumption Electrical Generation Total Emissions CO 1,211.7 2.4 6.2 1,220.2 Air Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day) ROG Nox PM10 97.4 0.6 0.3 98.3 122.9 12.7 35.4 171.1 30.3 0.0 1.2 31.6 SOx 176.9 0.0 3.7 180.6 Regional Source Vehicular Emissions Natural Gas Consumption Electrical Generation Total Emissions Table 22 Air Pollutant Emissions Under Proposed Specific Plan Air Pollutant Emissions (lbs/day) CO ROG NOx PM10 2,946.7 236.9 296.1 72.6 10.9 2.9 45.6 0.1 11.1 0.6 63.7 2.2 2,968.7 240.4 405.4 74.9 SOx 422.1 0.0 6.6 428.7 Table 23, Increase In Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Due To Specific Plan presents the increases in pollutant emissions due to the proposed Specific Plan. This is the difference between the regional emissions under the General Plan presented in Table 21 and the emissions under the proposed Specific Plan presented in Table 22. The increases in emissions due to the proposed Specific Plan are what are compared to the significance thresholds. The significance thresholds are presented in Table 23. Table 23 Increase In Regional Air Pollutant Emissions Due To Specific Plan Source Vehicular Emissions Natural Gas Consumption Electrical Generation Total Emissions Increase Significance Thresholds CO 1,735.0 8.6 4.9 1,7484.4 550.0 Air Pollutant Emissions (Ibs/day) ROG NOx PM10 139.5 2.3 0.2 142.0 173.2 32.9 28.3 234.4 250.0 42.3 0.1 1.0 43.4 100.0 SOx 245.2 0.0 3.0 248.2 250.0 Table 23 shows that the increase in regional air pollutant emissions is below the thresholds of significance for all pollutants except CO. The increase in CO emissions in projected to be more than three times greater than the significance threshold. The primary source of the increase in CO emissions is vehicular emissions. The project will result in significant air quality impact due to the increase in CO emissions. Conclusion The adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will have both short and long-term air emission impacts and contribute to air quality in the San Diego Air Basin. Based on air quality modeling conducted for build -out of the Specific Plan it is not anticipated that future 1 L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 115 1 development will exceed any established air quality emission thresholds, except for CO. However, because specific development projects are not proposed at this time, future projects could emit emissions that exceed air quality thresholds in force at that time. The City will evaluate all projects for potential air quality impacts at the time plans are submitted for approval. Measures to reduce air emissions will be incorporated when required to reduce both short and long-term air quality impacts for compliance with air emission thresholds enforced by SDAPCD. Mitigation measures are recommended that can be incorporated into the future projects to reduce air emissions, if they could exceed adopted emission thresholds. 4.6.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended for incorporation into future projects to further reduce air emissions. Short Term Construction If air quality impacts associated with construction of an approved project exceed the significance thresholds, mitigation measures identified below should be implemented as feasible to reduce emissions of the project. Mitigation measures from the SCAQMD are presented below and are recommended for projects in the SDAB, where applicable. The following measures are recommended to reduce pollutant emissions from construction activities. The construction operators shall implement these measures. • Use water trucks to keep all areas where vehicles move damp enough to prevent dust raised when traveling on the site; • Wet down the site in the late morning and after work is completed for the day; • After construction, wet inactive areas down to reduce windblown dust; • Employ street sweeping, should silt be carried over to adjacent public roadways; • Wash off trucks leaving the site; • Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering on portions of the site that will not be disturbed for lengthy periods (such as two months or more); • Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned; and • Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less. Long Term The most significant reductions in regional and local air pollutant emissions are attainable through programs, which reduce the vehicular travel associated with the project. Support and compliance with the RAQS for the basin is the most important measure to achieve this goal. The RAQS includes improvement of mass transit facilities and implementation of vehicular usage reduction programs. Additionally, energy conservation measures are included. None of these recommended mitigation measures are strictly required. However, all relevant measures should be applied to the greatest extent possible. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program FAR September 2004 Page 116 TDM Measures • Schedule truck deliveries and pickups for commercial uses during off-peak hours when feasible. This will alleviate traffic congestion, therefore, emissions during the peak hour. • Provide adequate ingress and egress at all entrances to public facilities to minimize vehicle f idling at curbsides. Presumably, this measure would improve traffic flow into and out of the parking lot. The air quality benefits are incalculable because more specific data is required. • Provide dedicated turn lanes as appropriate and provide roadway improvements at heavily congested roadways. Again, the areas where this measure would be applicable are the (F intersections in and near the project area. Presumably, these measures would improve traffic [ flow. Emissions would drop as a result of the higher traffic speeds, but to an unknown extent. [ r • Provide on -site services. Provide incentives such as on -site ATMs and other similar measures that address lifestyle needs. These measures reduce the VMT, but the air quality benefit cannot be quantified because more specific data is required. Energy Efficiency Measures and Additional Measures - • Compliance with Title 24, Part 6, Califomia's Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings. All buildings must comply with Title 24, Part 6. Reducing the need to heat or cool structures by improving thermal integrity will result in a reduced expenditure of energy and a reduction in pollutant emissions. • Develop operational emissions mitigation plan. Prior to approval of each building permit for a commercial or office use, the applicant shall submit to the Director of Planning for approval, an operational emissions mitigation plan. The plan shall identify implementation procedures for each of the following emissions reduction measures. If certain measures are determined infeasible, an explanation thereof shall be provided in the operational emissions mitigation plan. o Utilize built-in energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption and emissions. o Utilize energy -efficient and automated controls for air conditioners and lighting to reduce electricity consumption and associated emissions. • Develop plans to facilitate walking and use of bicycles. Prior to approval of each tentative tract map, the Applicant shall submit to the Director of Community Development for approval, a plan showing pedestrian/bicycle trails that facilitate connections to public facilities such as schools, parks, and regional trails, as well as between residential neighborhoods. 11 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 117 E.S c 1 c o Where possible, connect residential areas to public facilities, parks, regional trails and other residential neighborhoods with pedestrian/bicycle trails. o Where possible, connect commercial areas to adjacent residential areas via bike/walking paths. o Coordinate with SDTC regarding the location of bus turnouts and bus routes within the project area. 4.6.4 Significance After Mitigation As discussed above, specific development projects are not proposed as part of the specific plan. Because of this, it is speculative and not possible to produce reasonable estimates of construction related emissions. It is highly probable that emissions from some projects that will be developed as a result of the Specific Plan will generate construction emissions in excess of the significance thresholds. The short-term construction emissions can be reduced to some extent by the mitigation measures described above. However, it is probable that some construction emissions would still be in excess of the significance thresholds with mitigation. Therefore, short-term construction emissions associated with the project are considered unavoidable and adverse. Regional Impacts The long-term regional air quality impact due to the proposed project will be reduced to an extent with the mitigation measures described above. However, the amount of reduction cannot be quantified. The CO emissions increase due to the project would most likely remain above the significance thresholds even with incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures. Therefore, CO emission increases resulting from the project are considered unavoidable and adverse. Local Air Quality Impacts The CO emissions are projected to be in compliance with the 1-hour and 8-hour state and federal standards, therefore, the CO impacts are not considered to be significant. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 118 This page intentionally left blank EJ 4.7 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 4.7.1 Existing Conditions The Project Area includes a variety of land uses, including vacant property, residences, mixed - commercial, retail, automobile repair, light industrial, etc. Some of the light industrial uses and the commercial uses such as automotive repair shops, auto body shops, steel fabrication shops, etc. use hazardous materials as part of their daily business operation. It is highly likely that hazardous materials have been accidentally spilled on the sites of some businesses that routinely use hazardous materials. Hazardous materials have been found on property in the Project Area that has been redeveloped in the past few years. Therefore, there is a high probability that hazardous materials have been spilled and exist on some properties. Some businesses generate, use, treat, store, transport, and dispose of substances that are classified as either `hazardous wastes' or `hazardous materials' by the California Department of Health Services (CDHS). As defined in Section 25117 of the California Public Resources Code Division 30, Waste Management, "Hazardous waste means either of the following: 1. A waste, or combination of wastes, which because of its quantity, concentration, or physical, chemical, or infectious characteristics may either: a. Cause, or significantly contribute to an increase in mortality or an increase in serious irreversible, or incapacitating reversible, illness; or b. Pose a substantially present or potential hazard to human health or environment when improperly treated, stored, transported, or disposed of, or otherwise managed; or 2. A waste that meets any of the criteria for the identification of a hazardous waste adopted by the department pursuant to Section 25141." A hazardous material is any material that, because of its quantity, concentration, physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health and safety or to the environment if released into the work place or the environment. The National City Fire Department has a list of businesses that use hazardous materials. Hazardous materials are transported through National City on surface streets, railcar, and the freeways. In the event of an accident and a release of hazardous materials, the National City Fire Department is the first responder to a hazardous waste incident. If assistance is required, a hazardous materials response team from another city or the County of San Diego is dispatched to the site when requested by National City. There are businesses in the Project Area that handle and use hazardous materials. Businesses that use hazardous materials are required to obtain a permit from San Diego County Environmental Health. The City of National City Fire Department has information on the businesses in National City that use and store hazardous materials for safety to fire personnel when responding to emergencies. Because there are businesses in the Project Area that have and National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 119 use hazardous materials on a regular basis, there is the likelihood that some of the hazardous materials have been released and spilled in the past. Regulatory Compliance — Overview of the Management of Hazardous Substances Federal Agencies: Federal agencies that regulate hazardous substances include the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Occupations Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), Department of Transportation (DOT), and the National Institutes of Health (NIB). Hazardous substances handled in the City of National City, as with all cities, must comply with the following applicable regulations: • Federal Water Pollution Control Act • Clean Air Act • Occupational Safety and Health Act • Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act • Guidelines for Carcinogens and Biohazards • Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act Title III • Resource Conservation and Recovery Act • Safe Drinking Water Act, and • Toxic Substances Control Act Up until August 1992, the principal agency at the federal level regulating the generation, transport and disposal of hazardous waste was the EPA under the authority of the Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). As of August 1, 1992 the California Environmental Protection Agency (Ca1EPA) Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) was authorized to implement the State's hazardous waste management in lieu of the EPA. State Agencies: The Cal -EPA and the State Water Resources Control Board govern the use of hazardous materials and the management of hazardous waste. The California Highway Patrol (CHP) and the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) enforce hazardous substance transportation regulations. Under Cal -EPA, DTSC has primary regulatory responsibility, with delegation of enforcement to local jurisdictions that enter into agreements with the state agency, for the management of hazardous substances and the generation, transport and disposal of hazardous waste under the authority of the Hazardous Waste Control Law (HWCL). State regulations applicable to hazardous substances are indexed in Title 6 of the California Code of Regulations (CCR). The State Office of Planning and Research maintains a list of the various known hazardous waste and substance sites in California pursuant to AB 3750 (Cortese, Chapter 1048, Statute 1986). The list is updated and distributed to City and county planning agencies on a semi-annual basis. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 120 1 E 1 1 1 1 L Information on the list is provided by the State Department of Health Services, State Water Resources Control Board and the California Integrated Waste Management Board. Regional: The San Diego Air Pollution Control District works with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and is responsible for developing and implementing rules and regulations regarding air toxics on a local level. The SDAPCD establishes permitting requirements, inspects emission sources, and enforces measures through educational programs and/or fines. 4.7.2 Project Impacts According to the State CEQA Guidelines, the Specific Plan could result in significant adverse hazards and hazardous materials impacts if the Specific Plan: • Creates a significant hazard to the public or to the environment. There is property in the Project Area that has the potential to have contaminated soil. Automotive repair shops, auto body shops, and other businesses that use hazardous materials on a regular basis in their daily business activity have the potential for contaminated soil. Development of property with contaminated soil could have a significant impact on workers during construction as well as employees and adjacent residents. The City will require documentation on all property as part of the project approval process that is suspected of having contaminated soils due to the present or past uses on the site. Information will be required so the City can adequately determine if hazardous materials exist on the site. If hazardous materials are present the property owner will be required to remediate the property in compliance with all applicable local, county, state and federal laws and provide proof that the hazardous materials have been properly removed in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations prior to its development. There could be new businesses in the Downtown Specific Plan area that use or store hazardous materials as part of their normal business practice. While the specific plan does not specifically restrict or prevent the use or storage of hazardous materials, the City zoning ordinance does restrict the use and storage of hazardous materials. The use of hazardous materials in the Project Area in compliance with the City zoning ordinance will reduce potential hazardous material impacts to less than significant level. The federal, state, county, and local agencies that regulate and oversee the storage and use of hazardous materials will have jurisdiction of the proper use and storage of hazardous materials for any businesses in the Project Area that use or store hazardous materials. The laws and regulations that restrict the storage, use and transportation of hazardous materials along with the oversight of the public agencies that respond to hazardous waste spill are considered adequate to reduce potential hazardous waste impacts that may exist with the use of hazardous materials in the Specific Plan area to level less than significant. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program DIR September 2004 Page 121 As a state agency, the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has jurisdiction over the clean up of any hazardous materials that have been released. If hazardous materials are encountered in association with redevelopment or development of a piece of property, all site characterization, clean-up plans, removal and disposal will have to be approved by and completed in compliance with DTSC requirements and laws prior to the issuance of any demolition, grading or building permits. Because there are no development projects proposed as part of the Specific Plan, it is not known at this time whether or not there will be any acutely hazardous materials used by future businesses within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. The City will review all future development proposals to determine if a project is located within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school. If a project that emits or handles hazardous materials is located with one -quarter mile of a school, the appropriate studies will have to be prepared to identify the potential impacts of emissions on the students and measures will be incorporated into the project accordingly to protect the sensitive receptors. In addition to reviewing development proposal for the presence of hazardous materials in the soil and/or groundwater, the City will also review all project applications for the use or storage of hazardous materials. If a business proposes to store or use -hazardous materials, a hazardous materials storage permit may he required from the County of San Diego Environmental Health. The need for a hazardous storage permit will depend upon the type and quantity of hazardous material. If a business proposes to use or store a material that requires a hazardous storage permit the City will require the business owner obtain the necessary permit prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit. If any contaminated soils are encountered during the grading or construction of any project including public and private, construction will be suspended until the contamination is properly investigated. Remediation, if required, will be completed in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations of the appropriate regulatory oversight agency before construction could commence. The existing laws and regulations that restrict the storage, use and transportation of hazardous materials along with the public agencies that respond to emergencies are adequate to reduce potential hazardous waste impacts by future development in the Project Area to less than significant. Conclusion The Downtown Specific Plan will not directly create a significant potential public health hazard or involve the use, manufacture, or disposal of materials that will pose a hazard to people and planned populations. The adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will encourage the development of both public and private projects in the Project Area. It is speculative, however to determine if the Specific Plan could expose humans to significant health hazards if hazardous materials have been spilled. The development of sites that used hazardous materials in the past could expose the public or the environment to hazards due to the development of such sites. All properties proposed for development with spilled hazardous materials will have to comply with all applicable local, county, state and federal laws regarding the remediation of the hazardous materials prior to development. 1 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 122 The Specific Plan will not change the requirements to remediate contaminated properties prior to development. Assistance by the Community Development Commission to construct public or private projects will not change or alter any local, county, State or federal requirements to remove hazardous materials in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. Based on the threshold criteria, the Downtown Specific Plan will encourage development of property in the Project Area. It is possible that some sites in the Project Area may be contaminated with hazardous materials and result in significant adverse hazards and hazardous material impacts to the public or the environment. 4.7.3 Mitigation Measures The following measures are recommended to mitigate potential hazardous material impacts of development in the Project Area with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan: 1. Prior to development of any property that was formerly occupied by or adjacent to existing facilities that used or stored hazardous materials, a detailed Phase I Environmental Site Assessment shall be approved by the City of National City to evaluate the potential for soil and groundwater contamination. If warranted by the Phase 1 environmental site assessment, soil and possibly groundwater sampling shall be required. 2. Asbestos, mercury, and a lead -based paint survey of existing buildings shall he conducted prior to any renovation or demolition activities to the satisfaction of the City. 3. Prior to issuance of a grading permit for any property where the results of the Phase I, Phase II, and/or asbestos, mercury, or lead -based paint evaluation indicates the presence of these materials or the potential for hazardous materials at levels requiring mitigation, all remedial measures identified in the studies shall be shown on the face of the grading plans and/or incorporated into contractor specifications prior to awarding the construction contract or issuance of a demolition permit, whichever is first. All remedial measures required by law shall be implemented and completed prior to the issuance of grading or building permits, whichever is issued first. 4.7.4 Significance After Mitigation There will be no significant hazardous waste impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 123 This page intentionally left blank ET 11 4.8 POPULATION and HOUSING 4.8.1 Existing Conditions The City of National City adopted a Housing Element in June 2000 that extends from 1999 to 2004.12 The Housing Element provides the City the opportunity to plan for the existing and future housing needs in the community. The Housing Element was also prepared in compliance with the five-year update cycle required by State law. Population growth is one of the most important factors in determining the existing and future need for housing. National City is a developed older city within a dynamic and growing region. The City is now mostly built out, with few opportunities for residential growth other than small, infill development. The challenge the City faces is to accommodate reasonable growth while preserving and enhancing residential neighborhoods. Based on Census 2000, as of January 2000 National City had a population of 54,260 people, approximately 15,422 housing units, and 24,763 civilian and military employees.13 According to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG's) Preliminary 2030 Cities/County Forecast, National City is expected to have a population of 62,837 people, 17,029 housing units, and 27,263 employees in 2030; a gain of 8,577 new residents, 1,607 new housing units, and 2,500 new employees. National City offers a mix of housing choices, with its housing stock consisting of approximately 50 percent single-family homes, 47 percent multi -family units, and 2 percent mobile homes. The oldest neighborhoods, and those most reflective of the general character of National City, are those encompassed by I-5 and I-805 between Division Street and 24th Street. Since the majority of the housing stock was built before 1970, many housing units are over or approaching 30 years old. Many of the older neighborhoods, particularly in the western portion of the City, are showing signs of deterioration. As the housing stock continues to age, preserving its quality must become a priority of National City. Race and Ethnicity National City is the most ethnically diverse city in San Diego County. As indicated in Table 24, Race and Ethnicity in National City, 2000. Hispanics were the most prevalent racial/ethnic group in the City in 2000, constituting more than about half of the population. Non -Hispanic Whites were the next most prevalent population, accounting for approximately 14 percent of the population. Age Characteristics The age structure of a population is an important factor in evaluating housing needs and projecting the direction of future housing development. Typically, both the young adult 12 City of National City 1999-2004 Housing Element 13 SANDAG February 3, 2004, Data Warehouse. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 124 population (20-34 years) and the elderly population (65+ years) prefer apartments, low- to moderate -cost condominiums, and smaller single-family units. Persons between 35 to 54 years usually reside in higher cost apartments and condominiums and larger single-family units because they typically have higher incomes and larger household size. Table 24 Race and Ethnicity in National City, 20 Race/ Ethnicity Persons Number % of Total White 7,653 14.1% Hispanic 32,053 59.1% Black 2,823 5.2% Asian 9,863 18.2% Other 1,868 3.4% Total 54,260 100.0% ource: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 2000 Census Report Household Growth and Characteristics Household Growth Information on household characteristics is an important indicator of housing needs within a community. The Census defines a household as all persons who occupy a housing unit, which may include families related through marriage or blood, unrelated individuals living together, or an individual living alone. Persons living in retirement or convalescent homes, dormitories, or other group living situations are not included in this category. There were 15,422 households in National City in 2000 and by 2010, the number of households in the City is expected to increase to 15,749. Household Size Household size is an important indicator in identifying sources of population growth as well as overcrowding in individual housing units. A city's average household size will increase over time if there is a trend towards larger families. The average number of persons per household in National City in 2000 was 3.39 and as of January 1, 2003 was estimated at 3.44. Overcrowding Overcrowding is another indicator of housing affordability. Unit overcrowding is caused by the combined effects of low earnings and high housing costs in a community, and reflects the inability of households to buy or rent housing, which meets typical privacy standards. Typically, overcrowded households are defined as units with more than 1.0 person per room, excluding kitchens, bathrooms, hallways and porches. Severely overcrowded households are defined as those units with more than 1.5 persons per room. According to the 2000 Census, approximately 36 percent of all occupied housing units in National City were overcrowded. H c 11 1 1 11 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 125 1 c t_ E Household Income An important factor related to housing affordability is household income. While upper income households have more discretionary income to spend on housing, low- and moderate -income households are more limited in the range of housing they can afford. Typically, as the income of household's decreases, the incidence of overcrowding and the amount of persons occupying substandard units increase. The median household income in National City in 2000 was $30,121 whereas the median County household income was $47,087. The State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) has developed the following income categories: • Very Low Income- up to 50 percent of the County Median Family Income (MFI). • Low Income- from 51 percent to 80 percent of the County MFI. • Moderate Income- from 81 percent to 120 percent of the County MFI. • Upper Income- greater than 120 percent of the County MFI. The Regional Housing Needs Statement contains 1997 household income distribution data for National City. Distribution can be divided into these four income categories through interpolation, as shown in Table 25, 1997 Household Income Distribution. Based on the 1997 median income of 48,600 for the County, approximately 68 percent of all households in National City fall into the very low- and low-income categories. Table 25 1997 Household Income Distribution Income Category Households % of Total Very Low 6,698 44.6% Low 3,478 23.2% Moderate 2,575 17.2% Upper 2,257 15.0% TOTAL 15,008 100.0% ote: 1997 Median County Income: $48,600 Source: Regional Housing Needs Statement, SANDAG, May 1999. Special Needs Groups Certain segments of the population may have more difficulty in finding decent affordable housing due to special circumstances. In National City, these special needs groups include the elderly, disabled persons, large households, single parent/female headed households, the homeless, military personnel and college students. A brief discussion of each group is provided below. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program ETR September 2004 Page 126 Housing Stock Characteristics Housing Growth National City is an older community with virtually all of its residential land already developed. In 2000 there were an estimated 15,422 housing units in National City. Based on SANDAG projections National City is estimated to have approximately 15,749 housing units by 2010, an increase in 327 housing units. National City has experienced an increase in residential construction in the past few years and the 2010 estimated housing inventory will be reached much sooner. Housing Type and Tenure In the past ten years housing growth in National City has been primarily characterized by infill development of multi -family housing of five units or more and single family -attached units. According to the California State Department of Finance, National City's housing stock in 2000 was rather evenly split between single-family and multi -family units. Single-family units, detached and attached, comprised 51 percent of the housing stock, multi -family units constituted 46 percent of the housing stock, with mobile homes comprising approximately 3 percent. The 2000 Census indicated that of the City's 15,422 total housing units, 15,018 units were occupied and of the occupied housing units, 5,250 (35 percent) were owner -occupied and the remaining 10,172 units (65 percent) were renter -occupied and vacant. Age and Housing Stock Condition Age of housing is an important characteristic of supply because it is often an indicator of housing condition. Many federal and state programs use age of housing as one factor to determine housing rehabilitation needs. Table 26, Age of Housing Stock: 2000 illustrates the period in which housing units were built in National City. Housing growth began to slow during the late 1980s, reflecting the limited remaining land available for development. Approximately 4 percent of the total housing stock was built after 1990. Table 26 Aire of Housing Stock: 2000 Year Built Number of Units % of Total 1939 or Earlier 1,767 11.4% 1940-1959 4,842 31.2% 1960-1969 3,144 20.3% 1970-1979 3,551 22.9% 1980-1989 1,580 10.2% 1990-1994 401 2.6% 1995-1998 183 1.2% 1999-March 2000 53 0.3% TOTAL 15,521 100.0% Sources: U.S. Bureau of , Census 2000 b El 11 1 L 1 1 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 127 L The accepted age standard for a housing unit requiring major rehabilitation is 30 years or older. Currently approximately 74 percent of National City's housing stock is over 30 years old. The age of the City's housing stock indicates the potential need for rehabilitation and continued maintenance for a significant portion of the City's housing. The western portions of the City contain the oldest supply of housing, with the median age of the housing stock ranging from 46 to 60 years old. These parts of the City may have a significant portion of their housing stock in need of rehabilitation. Infrastructure improvements may also be required in the older portions of the City where public improvements may be outdated and substandard. Housing Goals and Policies The characteristics of the City's population, housing and employment, its housing goals, policies and programs and how the city will meet its housing goals and policies are discussed below: Preservation and Maintenance of Existing Housing As an older and primarily built out community, the City's priority housing goal is to preserve the existing housing stock and to avoid a degree of physical decline that will require a larger rehabilitation effort to restore quality and value. Given the large proportion of lower income households in the City, it is also important to conserve affordable housing units in the community to maintain adequate housing opportunities for all residents. Housing Goal 1 Maintain and enhance the quality of existing residential neighborhoods in National City. Policy 1.1: Encourage the practice of effective management in all rental housing projects in order to maintain and improve the quality of the City's rental housing. Policy 1.2: Protect the quality of life in established singe -family residential neighborhoods by limiting incompatible higher density residential or non-residential development in these areas and discouraging the construction of second dwelling units in these areas. Policy 1.3: Encourage property conservation and community enhancement through enforcement of the Design Guidelines and other land use and zoning regulations and programs. Housing Goal 2 Conserve the affordability of the existing housing stock. Policy 2.1: Consider, on a case -by -case basis, the conversion of existing apartments or other rental properties to condominiums, community projects, or stock cooperatives in order to provide additional home ownership opportunities at all income levels. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 128 Policy 2.2: Preserve "at -risk" affordable units through monitoring, working with potential nonprofit purchasers and managers, and exploring funding sources available to preserve the at - risk units. Housing Assistance The City of National City's goal is to provide a variety of residential opportunities within the City and to assist renters and owners who are overpaying for housing. Housing Goal 3 Increase the availability and affordability of safe and sanitary housing for all income groups, including higher income households, while providing adequate housing for households with special needs, including but not limited to the elderly, disabled, large families, single- parent - headed households, and military personnel. Policy 3.1: Implement existing and new housing assistance programs to meet renter and homeowner needs among the low and moderate income population of the City. Policy 3.2: Provide housing opportunities for all segments of the population, including those with higher incomes and those with special needs. Policy 3.3: Participate in regional planning strategies to provide both on -base and off -base housing for military personnel and their families. Policy 3.4: Promote a higher rate of homeownership in the City. Housing Production The City of National City encourages the production of new housing units that offer a wide range of housing types to ensure that an adequate supply is available to meet the existing and future needs of all groups. The provision of a balanced supply of housing in terms of unit type, cost, and style will allow the City to fulfill a variety of housing needs while attracting households from all economic levels, including the higher income levels. Housing Goal 4 Provide a sufficient number of housing units and range of housing types to meet the current and projected need of all economic segments, including moderate and higher income households. Policy 4.1: Achieve a full range of housing with an improved balance between ownership and rental housing units. Policy 4.2: Provide an adequate supply of land zoned for residential development to meet the projected housing need. Ensure that the development provides the optimum benefit to neighboring areas and the entire City. E 1 L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 129 c 1. Policy 4.3: Encourage the production of new housing affordable to all income ranges, including the moderate and middle income ranges to allow for variety and mobility in the housing supply. Policy 4.4: Encourage the development of mixed -use residential projects in commercially zoned areas in accordance with the City's Design Guidelines. Policy 4.5: Support programs that assist in the production of housing for lower income households. Policy 4.6: Provide a sufficient amount of larger sized rental units to reduce the incidence of overcrowding. Policy 4.7: Encourage the infilling of vacant lots with single family homes, where appropriate in order to promote higher rates of homeownership. Policy 4.8: Support flexible development standards on a project -by -project basis in certain neighborhoods in order to facilitate the development of quality housing and improve the character of the neighborhoods. Fair Housing It is important in every City to promote and assure fair housing practices and equal access to housing opportunities for all persons. Housing Goal 5 Promote a housing marketplace in which all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin or color have the same opportunity to obtain housing in the City. Policy 5.1: Support fair housing programs to promote equal housing opportunities for all residents to reside in the housing of their choice. Energy Conservation It is important that the City encourage planned and existing housing to conserve energy resources through design, building materials, landscaping, and location. Housing Goal 6 Enhance housing affordability through energy conservation techniques and design. Policy 6.1: Achieve state energy conservation standards for housing through planning and development review and permitting and enforcement programs. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program E,IR September 2004 Page 130 Policy 6.2: Review the type, location, and density of proposed new and/or rehabilitated housing to emphasize energy conservation and access to transit. Policy 6.3: Review the design of every new residential unit in the City with consideration to solar access. Policy 6.4: Encourage the use of operable windows, appropriate architectural features (e.g., overhangs, awnings and trellises) and energy efficient and low water volume appliances be used whenever feasible in residential projects. 4.8.2 Project Impacts The threshold criteria for determining whether or not the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will have population and/or housing impacts is whether or not the Specific Plan will: • Result in non-compliance with population and housing allocations for the region. • Displace a large number of people. • Create a substantial demand for additional housing. The Specific Plan is anticipated to encourage new development throughout the Project Area, including the construction of new residences and remodeling of existing units. There are parcels of vacant land as well as underutilized parcels that could be developed with residential units. The Specific Plan will increase the number of residential units that can be constructed compared to the current General Plan by approximately 890 units. As a result, the City and SANDAG will have to revise their future housing projections as well as population projections accordingly. The City of National City will be updating its Housing Element in the near future. The City can revise its housing numbers to reflect an increase in housing units allowed in National City based on the number of units allowed by the Downtown Specific Plan. It is speculative at this time to determine with any accuracy where the people that move into the new residential units will move. It is certain that people both outside as well as within National City will move into the new residences constructed in the Project Area. Current population data indicates overcrowding in some of the existing residential units in National City therefore, it is highly possible that existing residents will occupy some of the new units. It is also likely that people that live outside of National City will occupy new residences, increasing National City's population. As a result, the Specific Plan will indirectly increase the City's population beyond future levels projected by SANDAG. The City will update its estimated future population based on the number of additional residential units allowed by the Downtown Specific Plan beyond the number presently allowed by the General Plan. The development and rehabilitation of existing light industrial and commercial uses in the Project Area could indirectly increase the number of city residents. The construction of new commercial and light industrial buildings, or the expansion of existing businesses could indirectly increase the population due to employees moving to National City. Although it is expected that most employees either live in National City or commute from their current place of 1t National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 131 c 1 L residence, a few employees may relocate to National City. The number of new employees that may relocate to National City in the future due to the construction of new or rehabilitation of existing commercial and light industrial uses in the Project Area is anticipated at this time to be minimal and not significant. Redevelopment Plan The Community Development Commission of the City of National City functions as the Redevelopment Agency for the City and the area covered by this Specific Plan. In common with other Redevelopment Agencies, the CDC provides 20 percent of all property tax increment received within the redevelopment project area for the production of affordable housing. The CDC has been pro -active in providing affordable units throughout the City, through rehabilitation and new construction. The CDC will continue to provide low and moderate income tax increment funds for projects located within the Downtown Specific Plan area, as well as replacement housing and relocation benefits, as required by State law. The City has a variety of existing housing programs the CDC could participate in to provide additional low and moderate -income housing. The set -aside money can be used to either construct new residential units or rehabilitate existing units. The money can also be used outside the redevelopment project area to provide low and moderate -income housing as long as CDC can show a benefit to the redevelopment project area. However, with the increase in land designated for residential use by the Specific Plan it is anticipated that the CDC could find suitable projects in the Specific Plan Project Area to use low and moderate tax increment revenue. The development of additional low and moderate income housing due indirectly to the Specific Plan will have positive benefits to the community. The Downtown Specific Plan will significantly increase the number of residential units that could be constructed with the current general plan. The additional units allowed by the Specific Plan are needed to serve both the immediate and future housing needs of the city. Based on the projected future housing needs by SANDAG there is a large gap between the need for and the number of residential units available and that gap is expected to continue and increase in the future. The Specific Plan will have positive impacts by allowing the construction of additional residential units towards closing that gap. The Specific Plan proposes a variety of housing types such as single-family detached, condominiums, town homes, and apartments. The range of housing type and densities will help the city meet some of its housing goals such as enhancing the quality of existing residential neighborhoods, conserving the affordability of the existing housing stock, increase the availability and affordability of safe and sanitary housing for all income groups, providing a sufficient number of housing units and range of housing types to meet the current and projected need of all economic segments, including moderate and higher income households, and provide a housing marketplace that all persons regardless of race, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, national origin, or color have the same opportunity to obtain housing in the City. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 132 Conclusion The Specific Plan will allow an increase in the number of residential units that can be constructed in the Project Area beyond the number currently allowed by the General Plan. An increase in the number of housing units that can be provided to the residents of National City will allow the City to provide a range of housing types towards meeting more of the housing needs of the community. In addition, because the Project Area is in a redevelopment project area the Community Development Commission has the legal authority to assist to provide financial assistance to upgrade, improve and provide additional residential housing, including low and moderate housing, which will be a positive impact for the community. The Specific Plan will require the City to adjust its projected housing and population projections to reflect the increase in the number of residential units. The Specific Plan will not require a displacement of a large number of people, rather it will allow construction of increased housing units to meet some of the current housing need in National City. The commercial and light industrial development proposed by the Specific Plan is less than allowed by the existing general plan, thus the project will not create a substantial demand for additional housing. Based on the threshold criteria the Specific Plan will not have a significant housing, and population impact. Although the Downtown Specific Plan will increase the overall number of residential units allowed in National City, the City will adjust its housing and population projections during the upcoming Housing Element update. 4.8.3 Mitigation Measures The Specific Plan will not have any significant housing or population impacts, therefore, no mitigation measures are required. 4.8.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant population or housing impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan Es f E 1 L 1 L 1 6 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 133 L 4.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES 4.9.1 Existing Conditions There are no known archaeological sites in National City. There are historical sites in National City, including the Project Area. Citywide there are four National Registered historical buildings and 26 locally designated significant buildings for a total of 30 historical sites. Five historical sites are located in the Project Area. The five sites include the Brick Row, which is a National Historical building, and locally designated buildings at 907 A Avenue (Elizur Steel, Crandall, Ennis houses), 921 A Avenue (Frank Kimball house), 939 A Avenue (John Proctor house), and 907 D Avenue (Boyd-Vurgason house). 4.9.2 Project Impacts According to the State CEQA Guidelines, a project could have a significant effect on cultural resources if the project will: • Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource defined in §15064.5; • Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5; • Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries; or • Directly or indirectly disturb a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geological feature. Although most of the property in the Project Area has been developed and disturbed, it is possible that new construction could uncover archaeological resources that exist and were not uncovered in the past. Depending upon the significance of any uncovered archaeological resource the impact could be significant. If an archaeological resource is uncovered, its' significance will be evaluated by a qualified archaeologist. Measures will be incorporated to protect the resource in compliance with Section 21083.2 of the California Public Resources Code. Pursuant to Public Resources Code 21083.2, an archaeologist and the City will determine the measures that will be implemented to either protect the resources in place, or excavate and relocate the resource to an appropriate location for preservation or display. Development could occur adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the four locally designated historical buildings or Brick Row, which is a National Register building. The Brick Row structure is protected by Federal law and any changes to the building will have to comply with Federal law. The locally designated historical buildings are not protected by any laws or regulations and they can be demolished or remodeled at the discretion of the owner, with proper demolition or building permits from the city. Presently there are no local laws that prevent the four locally designated buildings from being demolished or altered. The demolition or remodeling of the four locally designated buildings could have a significant impact to the local history. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 134 There may be additional buildings in the Project Area that are important to the local history and have not been identified. The demolition or remodeling of the locally designated historical structures could impact the local history of National City. CDC staff should review all demolition and remodeling plans to existing locally significant historical properties. If CDC staff concludes that a locally significant historical building would be significantly impacted, measures to protect and preserve the building could be required as deemed necessary by CDC. Development adjacent to f the Brick Row building could impact the historical importance of this resource. All future development projects adjacent to Brick Row should be reviewed by CDC staff to ensure the protection of the Brick Row building. The preservation of the existing historical buildings (national and local) will be important to protect the historical flavor of the area. Preservation of other buildings in the Project Area that reflect the architecture of the historical buildings, or construction of new buildings that reflect the desired architecture will be a positive impact. Participation of the National City Historical Society when requested by CDC staff as a reviewing entity will ensure the protection of the existing historical buildings in the project area. Conclusion Based on the threshold criteria, the Specific Plan will not impact any national or local historical resources. The Specific Plan does not propose to demolish or remodel any of the buildings in the Project Area that are registered as national or local historic structures. 4.9.3 Mitigation Measures Since no significant cultural resource impacts have been identified no mitigation measures are required. 4.9.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant impacts to cultural resources are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. 1 L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 135 1 l L 4.10 PUBLIC SERVICES 4.10.1 Water Service 4.10.1.1 Existing Conditions The Sweetwater Authority provides potable water to National City, including the Project Area. Their source of the water supply is from surface water runoff and collection at the Sweetwater Reservoir. This water supply is augmented by the San Diego County Water Authority aqueduct system as necessary. Daily and seasonal peak flow requirements such as fire flow are offset by operational storage reservoirs. Approximately 10 to 20% of Sweetwater Authority's water supply is from groundwater from the R.A. Reynolds Demineralization Plant in the northern portion of Chula Vista and wells in National City. There is a network of water mains that provides water for drinking, fire flow, and landscape maintenance. The water mains in the Project Area range from 4 to 8-inches in diameter. Smaller diameter lines extend from the water main to individual buildings. The water mains are upgraded and/or upsized as necessary to provide an adequate water supply. The subject of water conservation has been given increased attention in recent years due to local and regional water purveyors concerned about meeting the future water demands of their customer, especially in time of drought. The State of California has mandated water conservations measures that are required for all projects, as applicable pursuant to Titles 20 and 24 of the California Administrative Code. Water conservation provides an approach to meeting the water demand for a community by managing water demand so that customers receive adequate service, but use less water. 4.10.1.2 Project Impacts In accordance with Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, the threshold criteria for determining whether or not the Specific Plan could have potential water service impacts is if development: • Cannot be served from existing entitlements and resources and will require the construction of new water facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects; or • Disrupts water service or causes water purveyors to provide inadequate levels of service. Substantially degrade or deplete groundwater resources. The Specific Plan will encourage new development as well as redevelopment throughout the Project Area. New development will increase the demand for potable water for drinking, fire flow, and landscape maintenance. Redevelopment of a previous use may or may not increase water consumption depending if the new use requires more or less water than the previous use. While the Specific Plan will increase the demand for potable water the Sweetwater Authority has the ability to meet long-term commitments to provide potable water to future projects in the Project Area. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 136 Individual development projects could require the construction of upgrades to the existing water system. Although Sweetwater Authority's distribution system in the Project Area is generally sufficient to serve future development, some existing water mains may have to be upsized or extended to serve new development. Some of the smaller diameter water mains may have to be upsized to 8 inches, or extended to serve future projects. The City in conjunction with the Sweetwater Authority will make the determination at the time development plans are submitted for approval whether or not existing water mains will have to be upsized or extended. If improvements to the existing water distribution system are necessary the project developer could be required to construct the necessary upgrades and improvements. If upgrades to the existing water distribution system are required, additional environmental analysis may be required by CEQA to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the required improvements. The City will require the Sweetwater Authority to review all projects to determine whether or not an adequate supply of potable water can be provided. As a condition of project approval a developer may be required to construct new or upgrade existing water distribution facilities. It is speculative at this time to determine whether or not upgrades and improvements, if any will be required for new development in the Project Area. The CDC could, at its discretion, construct needed water distribution facilities in the Project Area to serve future development. Because the Project Area is located in an adopted redevelopment project area the CDC can use tax increment revenue to construct upgrades and/or improvements that are required to serve new development. Construction of needed water distribution facilities by the CDC will have a positive impact on the Project Area. All applicable development in the Project Area will be required to incorporate all state mandated water conservation measures required by Titles 20 and 24 of the California Administrative Code. These water conservation measures include, but are not limited to, low flush toilets, drought tolerant landscaping, and water conserving fixtures. In addition, residential development could incorporate, as applicable, non -mandated water conservation measures for both indoor and outdoor activities such as water efficient dishwashers, water pressure reducing valves, hot water pipe insulation, and hot water on -demand units. The construction of improvements to the existing water distribution system could have construction impacts. It is speculative at this time to evaluate the potential environmental impacts that may occur with the construction of water system improvements since plans are not available. However, some of the short-term construction impacts that could be anticipated include soil erosion, traffic congestion, noise with the operation of construction equipment, traffic delays for improvement projects that are in streets, etc. The city will determine if additional environmental analysis is required for water distribution improvement projects for compliance with CEQA at the time water improvement plans are submitted for approval. If required by CEQA, the city will prepare additional environmental analysis to identify potential environmental impacts and recommend measures accordingly to reduce significant impacts. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 137 1 11 Conclusion The Specific Plan will encourage development that may increase the demand for potable water for drinking, fire suppression, and landscape maintenance. New development and/or redevelopment could require upgrades to the existing distribution system in order for development to have an adequate supply of water. The construction of upgrades to the existing water distribution system could have construction impacts, which will have to be specifically identified at the time water improvement plans are submitted for approval. The City, in conjunction with the Sweetwater Authority, will determine whether or not an adequate supply of water can be provided at the time development plans are submitted for approval. The Sweetwater Authority may require improvements to the existing water distribution system in order for a project to have an adequate supply of water. Projects will be required to incorporate all state mandated water conservation measures as applicable to reduce water consumption. The incorporation of state mandated as well as suggested water conservation measures will reduce water impacts to less than significant. 4.10.1.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures are recommended to reduce water consumption impacts: 1. All water utility plans shall be approved by the Sweetwater Authority to ensure that adequate water service is provided to the development. 2. The City shall require the incorporation of all state mandated water conservation measures. The City shall also require the additional incorporation, as applicable, of water conservation measures including water efficient dishwashers, water pressure reducing valves, hot water pipe insulation, and hot water on -demand units as applicable. 4.10.1.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant water distribution and supply impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measures. 4.10.2 Police Protection 4.10.2.1 Existing Conditions The National City Police Department provides police protection for the city. The Police Department has 87 sworn police officers of which 35 are patrol officers. The balance of the officers are assigned to investigations and administrative service. A typical daytime patrol shift includes one sergeant and four officers. The response time for Priority One service calls, which are life threatening, is four minutes. The Police Department's threshold response time to a Priority One call is five minutes. The response time for a Priority One call has decreased from three to four minutes during the past year. Priority Two and Priority Three response times are 10 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 138 and 39 minutes, respectively. While Priority Two response times have not changed significantly over the past year, Priority Three response time have changed from 25 to 39 minutes.14 4.10.2.2 Project Impacts The proposed Specific Plan will have direct adverse impacts on police protection if the project will: • Reduce priority one service calls to less than five minutes. The Specific Plan will result in new development throughout the Project Area. As new development occurs, there will be increase in the demand for police protection services, including service such as theft, burglary, and vandalism as well as an increase in motor vehicle violations, traffic accidents, etc. An increase in Priority One, Two, and Threes calls to the current police department staff will impact and reduce the time it takes police officers to responds to all priority service calls. Additional calls for service will reduce the Department's desired average response time for Priority One, as well as Priority Two and Three calls. Future development in the Project Area due indirectly to the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will increase the need for additional police personnel and equipment as development increases. Development plans for projects that are anticipated in the Project Area are not available at this time. Therefore, it is speculative to determine if future projects will significantly impact police services and the Police Department's ability to respond to priority calls within their desired time frames. Because the Police Department is approaching its maximum Priority One response time of five minutes and is at the desired Priority Two response time of ten minutes, future development in the Project Area could impact response times. Future development in the Project Area could impact the Police Department and require additional police protection personnel and/or equipment to keep and maintain response times at desired levels. The Police Department currently reviews plans for new development projects to ensure buildings have proper security hardware, the sites are properly visible from adjacent streets for police surveillance, etc. When necessary the Police Department makes recommendations to incorporate measures into projects to improve the safety for residents, employees, the general public and police officers. The incorporation of the Police Department's changes to improve the safety of projects can reduce the number of service calls for police protection and help maintain desired response times. Conclusion The Specific Plan is anticipated to encourage development and increase the need the police protection services. Although measures can be incorporated into future projects to improve police safety, additional development will increase calls for service. An increase in service calls could impact the time it takes for police officers to respond to Priority One, Priority Two, and Priority Three calls. Additional service calls could impact the Police Department's ability to 14 Lt. Ray Allen, National City Police Department, telephone conversation March 8, 2004. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 139 i.l 8 1 1 1 1 1 1 C c maintain desired levels of police service. Future development plans will be reviewed by the Police Department at the time they are submitted to the city for approval. The Police Department will, during their review, determine if design changes or safety hardware can be incorporated to reduce calls for service. The incorporation of the Police Department's recommendations will reduce calls for police protection. The development of additional projects in the Project Area may require additional police protection personnel and/or equipment 'to meet the Departments desired response times. Based on the threshold criteria, the Specific Plan could indirectly have significant impacts on police protection services. 4.10.2.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended to reduce police protection impacts: 1. The Police Department shall review all future development projects for police protection impacts and ensure that additional police personnel and/or equipment are provided to provide an acceptable level of police protection services deemed acceptable by the Police Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 4.10.2.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant police protection impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. 4.10.3 Fire Protection 4.10.3.1 Existing Conditions The National City Fire Department provides fire protection services throughout the city. The Fire Department currently has an average response time of less than five minutes citywide. The Fire Department maintains a comprehensive Automatic Aid Agreement for fire protection services with the surrounding cities, including the County of San Diego. This agreement was established to provide assistance for major emergency incidents. All protected jurisdictions have mutually agreed to dedicate their resources, to the extent feasible, to major incidents in the state. If a fire emergency occurs in National City that requires additional fire personnel and equipment, fire departments from surrounding jurisdictions will respond when requested. 4.10.3.2 Project Impacts The Specific Plan will have an adverse impact on fire services if it will: • Reduce response times to less than acceptable levels by the Fire Department. The Specific Plan will encourage new development and redevelopment throughout the Project Area. As new development occurs there will an increased demand for fire protection services. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 140 An increase in service calls could impact the ability of the Fire Department to respond to calls in less than five minutes, their desired response time. Because development plans are not available at this time it is speculative to determine if future individual projects will impact fire protection services. At the time project development plans are submitted to the city for approval the Fire Department will review the project for compliance with the fire code and determine if the project could impact the Department. At that time the Fire Department will, if necessary, recommend changes to meet the fire code and improve fire safety to reduce service calls. The Fire Department will also review plans to determine if additional personnel and/or equipment are needed to provide an acceptable level of fire service. It is possible that future projects could require additional fire protection personnel and/or equipment that if not provided could impact the Fire Department's ability to respond to fire emergencies in a timely manner. Improvements to the street and circulation system in the Project Area that improves fire service response times will have a positive impact on the Department and fire protection services. The construction of street improvements including street widening, installation of streetlights and traffic signals could reduce the travel time for fire personnel responding to emergency calls. The construction of upgrades and improvements to the water distribution system to improve fire flow will have a positive impact on the Fire Department's ability to control fires. All new development as well as redevelopment of existing buildings will be required to comply with all applicable fire codes. The compliance with the fire code will reduce service calls because of the fire safety measures that are required. The demolition of existing buildings that don't meet current fire codes and replacing them with buildings that meet current fire codes and include fire retardant materials, fire sprinklers, and other fire protection measures will have a positive impact on the Department. The City of National City Fire Department will be the first responding agency to a fire service call in the Project Area. The Specific Plan allows development of buildings that the height could exceed the capabilities of the Fire Department. If a fire emergency occurs that exceeds the capability of the National City Fire Department an adjacent fire department will be called to respond to the emergency pursuant to the existing mutual aid agreement. The capabilities of the National City Fire Department in conjunction with surrounding jurisdictions pursuant to the mutual aid agreement and fire protection measures required by the Uniform Building and Fire Codes will reduce potential fire hazards to less than significant. Conclusion The Specific Plan is anticipated to encourage new development and redevelopment of existing uses. Increased development will increase the need for fire protection services. Additional demand for fire protection services could impact the Fire Department by reducing the ability of fire units to respond to calls throughout the City within its desired response time of five minutes. Future development plans will be reviewed by the Fire Department for compliance with the fire code. Additional measures to improve fire safety and reduce service calls will also be F E L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 141 recommended by the Fire Department. Based on the threshold criteria, the Specific Plan could have significant impacts on the Fire Department by reducing emergency response times. 4.10.3.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended: 1. The Fire Department shall review all future development projects for fire protection impacts and ensure that additional fire personnel and/or equipment are provided to provide an acceptable level of fire protection services deemed acceptable by the National City Fire Department prior to the issuance of building permits 4.10.3.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant fire protection impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. 4.10.4 School Facilities 4.10.4.1 Existing Conditions The City of National City is served by two school districts and a community college district. The National City School District serves grades K-6 and the Sweetwater Union High School District serves grades 7-12. Southwestern College is a community college with the main campus in Chula Vista and a satellite campus under construction in the Project Area at the intersection of 8th Street and National City Boulevard. Most of the public schools (K-12) serving the students in National City are either at or over -capacity. The school districts install portable classrooms at schools when necessary to provide adequate classroom space. The school districts collect school impact fees for new development as allowed by state law. The school impact fee is used by the districts to provide classroom space for additional students. Presently, the Sweetwater Union High School District collects $1.54 per square foot for residential development and $0.18 per square foot for commercial/industrial use. The National City School District collects $.85 per square foot for residential use and $0.14 per square foot for commercial/industrial use. The San Diego County Office of .Education (COE) provides a variety of school and educational services to County residents, including residents of National City. Some of the programs provided by COE are direct services to students, including children (infants, preschool and students grades K-12), and adults. Other COE services are provided through public schools, including forty-two school districts and five community college districts in San Diego County, including Southwestern College. The services provided by COE include staff development for teachers and administrators as well as numerous management support services. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 142 4.10.4.2 Project Impacts According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project could have a significant adverse impact on school services, if it will: • Result in a need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which may cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives. The Specific Plan proposes to increase the number of residential units in the Project Area beyond the units allowed by the General Plan. An increase in the development of non -senior residential units will increase the number of students that attend area schools. Because the schools in both districts that serve the Project Area are either at or over -capacity, additional students will impact significantly those schools. The payment of the required school impact fees will reduce the impact of residential development on the affected schools because the fees are used to provide additional classrooms to serve new students. Light industrial and commercial (non-residential) uses do not generally generate school age students. While the employees generate students to the schools where they live, the employees of a new business will not necessarily generate students to schools in the area of the business. Indirectly, a business can generate students if employees relocate to the city where they work and enroll their students in the area school. However, this is not a typical practice and the number of students that will attend schools in National City from new light industrial or commercial development will be minimal. The construction of new light industrial and commercial use in the Project Area is not anticipated to significantly impact the capacity of area schools. The school impact fees will be used to mitigate the impact of any students that may be generated by commercial or light industrial development in the Project Area. The Specific Plan proposes to increase the number of residential units in the Project Area compared to the number of units currently allowed by the General Plan. An increase in the number of units will also increase the population of National City. An increase in the city's population could impact programs offered by the San Diego County Office of Education such as the Regional Occupation Program, Hope Infant Handicapped Program, Migrant Education Program, Outdoor Education Program, Teacher Training and Development/Administration and Development, and Administration. The potential impact of the Specific Plan will depend upon a number of factors, including the population increase in National City due to new development and the number of people of that population increase that needs COE programs, and the ability to accommodate additional people. Because no specific development projects are proposed at this time it is speculative to determine whether or not the Specific Plan will indirectly impact COE programs. Conclusion Based on the threshold criteria the Specific Plan could have a significant impact on public schools due to an increase in the population in the Project Area. An increase in the population could increase the number of students that will attend area schools. The payment of developer 1 I2 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 143 impact fees as allowed by state law prior to the issuance of building permits will mitigate the impact due to the generation of additional students that will be generated by new development, both residential and commercial. 4.10.4.3 Mitigation Measures Since no significant school impacts have been identified with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan, no mitigation measures are recommended. 4.10.4.4 Significance After Mitigation There will be no significant school impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan, therefore no mitigation measures are recommended. 4.10.5 Sewer Services 4.10.5.1 Existing Conditions San Diego Metro Sewer System The City of National City owns and operates the local sewer lines that collect and transport city - generated wastewater to the City of San Diego South Metro Interceptor Sewer (Metro) line located west of Interstate 5. By agreement, the City of National City is allowed to generate 7.5 million gallons per day of wastewater to the South Metro Interceptor Sewer. Wastewater from National City is treated at the Point Loma wastewater treatment plant. Flows in National City as of August 2003 were 5.67 million gallons per day. The city has capacity in the Metro line for additional wastewater flows. The wastewater collection system in the Project Area includes sewer lines ranging from 6 to 27 inches in diameter. For the most part, the existing sewer collection system is adequate to serve the existing development. 4.10.5.2 Project Impacts The Specific Plan will have a significant impact on sewer services if it will: • Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Control Board; • Require or result in the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects; • Require sewer service where additional sewage treatment capacity is not presently available; or • Result in the deterioration of the quality of service provided to the area. The Specific Plan will encourage both new development as well as redevelopment of existing uses, which will increase sewage flows. Based on preliminary analysis the existing sewer facilities in the northern and southern portion of the Project Area are adequate to serve the development proposed by the Specific Plan. Some sewer collection facilities in the central portion of the Project Area are inadequate to accommodate the increased sewage flows that are National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 144 anticipated due to the increased development proposed by the Specific Plan. As a result, upgrades to specific sections of the existing sewage collection facilities will be required to adequately accommodate the estimated increased sewage flows. All projects will be required to have adequate wastewater collection and treatment plant capacity prior to project approval. Since development plans for projects in the central portion of the Project Area are not available at this time it is speculative to determine the improvements that will be necessary to the existing wastewater collection facilities to serve the new development. The City will determine the improvements that are necessary. At the time plans are submitted for approval the City will if improvements and upgrades are required to assure sewage flows do not exceed City Engineering Standards. If adequate facilities are not available, the project developer will be required to construct the necessary improvements to serve the project. The construction of sewer collection facilities could have construction impacts. It is speculative at this time to evaluate the potential environmental impacts that may occur with the construction of sewage collection facilities since plans are not available. However, some of the short-term construction impacts that could be anticipated include soil erosion, traffic congestion, noise with the operation of construction equipment, traffic delays for projects that are constructed in streets, etc. The city will determine if additional environmental analysis is required for sewage improvement projects for compliance with CEQA at the time plans are submitted for approval. If required by CEQA, the city will prepare additional environmental analysis to identify potential environmental impacts and recommend measures accordingly to reduce significant impacts. Conclusion The Specific Plan proposes to increase the amount of development, which will impact the existing sewage collection system that serves the central portion of the Project Area. The sewer system that serves the central portion may have to be upgraded to serve future sewage flows if they cannot be handled by existing facilities. The construction of upgrades to the sewage collection system could have construction impacts, which will have to be specifically identified at the time sewer improvement plans are submitted for approval. If development projects require upgrades to existing sewage collection facilities the project developer will have to pay the cost to upgrade the facilities in conjunction with project construction. 4.10.5.3 Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measure is recommended to ensure that adequate sewage collection facilities are available to serve new development. 1. All development projects shall be reviewed by the National City Public Works Department to make sure that adequate sewer collection facilities will be available to serve the project. If the Public Works Department determines the existing sewer collection facilities are not adequate the project developer shall construct the facilities necessary to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 145 1 1 4.10.5.4 Significance After Mitigation There will be no significant sewage impacts with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan and incorporation of the recommended mitigation measure. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program ETR September 2004 Page 146 This page intentionally left blank L 1 L 4.11 RECREATION 4.11.1 Existing Conditions The Specific Plan includes Kimball Park, which is a city park. Kimball Park has a variety of active and passive recreational facilities including a softball field, tennis courts, picnic areas, restroom facilities, and a pedestrian trail. In addition, there are other public parks in National City that provide a variety of active and passive recreational facilities for residents. The city collects a park fee of $125 for each new residence that is constructed and the monies are used to upgrade existing recreational facilities, provide new facilities and acquire new parkland. 4.11.2 Project Impacts The City strives to maintain or expand the current (1996) ratio of park and open space land to population, which is at least 43/4 acres per 1000 residents (including local parks, public -owned wetlands, golf courses, and school recreational facilities). The threshold criteria for determining whether or not the Specific Plan will have recreational impacts is based on: • If the project will increase the demand for new park or recreational facilities or increase the demand on existing facilities beyond the City's current ratio of 43/4 acres per 1,000 residents. The Specific Plan does not propose to provide any park or active recreational facilities in the Project Area. However, the Specific Plan proposes to provide a variety of passive amenities and open space that will provide some recreational benefits for residents, visitors, etc. The passive amenities proposed by the Specific Plan include landscaped public meeting areas, public art, a fountain plaza on 9th Street between A Street and National City Boulevard, a 9th Street park to be located somewhat central to 9th Street, and a linear park along the east side of Interstate 5 from Division Street on the north to Plaza Boulevard on the south. The fountain plaza will serve as a public gathering place and includes a large fountain as the centerpiece with trees, special paving, lighting, seating and other landscaping to encourage its use. A linear park is proposed along the east side of I-5 adjacent to Roosevelt Boulevard and includes a continuous walking/jogging path, a wide landscaped buffer area, and fence to separate the trail from the freeway right of way. The construction of hardscape and landscape amenities throughout the Project Area will have a positive impact by providing additional passive recreational amenities for the community. The Specific Plan encourages pedestrian traffic between the downtown area and Kimball Park to encourage the use of Kimball Park and better serve the recreational needs of existing and future residents in the Project Area. Improvements to the landscaping and hardscape of the streets linking the downtown area with Kimball Park will have positive benefits to the community by encouraging pedestrian traffic from the core downtown area to Kimball Park. A Landscape Maintenance District is proposed to fund the maintenance of the landscaping, lighting, hardscape, common areas, fountain plaza, etc. proposed by the Specific Plan. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 147 Assessment of property in the Project Arca will provide the funds necessary to maintain the proposed open space and landscape amenities. The potential impacts associated with the construction of the pedestrian walkways, linear trail, fountain plaza, and other public open space amenities cannot be fully evaluated at this time because plans are not available. The types of potential impacts that could be anticipated with construction include short-term impacts such as construction noise, traffic congestion, traffic delays, soil erosion, etc. Although there will be short-term construction impacts, the impacts will cease upon completion of construction and are not anticipated to be significant. Increased residential development beyond the intensity planned by the general plan could increase the demand on existing park and recreational facilities. An increased demand and usage of the existing recreational facilities could impact the facilities and result in a need for the City to provide additional facilities at existing parks or develop new parks. The City will collect $125 for each new residential unit constructed in the Project Area. The money will be used to upgrade and/or expand existing park and recreational facilities, or acquire additional parkland as deemed necessary by the City to meet the recreational needs of the residents. Depending upon the extent of the use of the existing city park and recreational facilities by residents in the Project Area the existing park and recreational facilities may or may not be impacted. The park fees will mitigate the impact future residents will have on park and recreational facilities. The development of commercial and light industrial development in the Project Area will have a minimal impact on existing park and recreational facilities. Unlike residential development, employees of commercial and light industrial uses .typically do not create a demand for recreational facilities. Although some employees may use local parks or recreational facilities before, during or after work, the number of employees that use the recreational facilities will be minimal and is not anticipated to significantly impact existing facilities. The park and recreational facilities that serve National City along with the passive recreational and open space facilities proposed by the Specific Plan should be adequate to serve the people employed in the Project Area without impacting existing facilities. The Specific Plan will not cause the City to exceed its current desired ratio of park and open space. The Specific Plan proposes additional open space. The residential park fee will be used by the City to develop additional parkland or provide recreational facilities at existing parks to meet the demand by the project. Conclusion Based on the threshold criteria, the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will not result in any significant park or recreational impacts. The City will collect a fee for each new residential unit constructed in the Project Area. The monies will be used to upgrade or provide additional recreational facilities as needed and the park fee will mitigate the impacts of the project on park and recreational resources. There are no activities associated with the Specific Plan that will reduce or eliminate existing park or recreational facilities. The Specific Plan will have positive impacts by providing additional landscaped open space and passive recreational facilities in the Project Area, including a linear trail, sitting areas, fountain, etc. c c 0 1 1 L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 148 1 12 4.11.3 Mitigation Measures Since no significant park and recreational impacts have been identified with the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan, no mitigation measures are recommended. 4.11.4 Significance After Mitigation No significant park and recreational impacts are anticipated with adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 149 This page intentionally left blank 11 L 1 1 5.0 OTHER CEQA MANDATED EIR SECTIONS 5.1 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS Section 15130(a) of the CEQA Guidelines states "An EIR shall discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in Section 15065(c)". Further, Section 15355 of the Guidelines describes cumulative impacts as two or more individual effects which, when considered together, are considerable or which compound or increase other environmental impacts. The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment that results from the incremental impact of the project when added to other closely related past, present, and reasonable foreseeable probable future projects. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor but collectively significant projects taking place over a period of time. Section 15130(b) of the Guidelines describes an adequate discussion of cumulative impacts as one which includes either of the following elements: 1. A list of past, present, and probable future projects producing related or cumulative impacts, including, if necessary, those projects outside the control of the agency; or 2. A summary of projections contained in an adopted general plan or related planning document, or in a prior environmental document which has been adopted or certified, which described or evaluated regional or area -wide conditions contributing to the cumulative impact. 5.1.1 Projects Evaluated for Cumulative Impacts Analysis This section examines cumulative impacts on a local basis. For the purposes of this cumulative impact analysis, a list of individual projects has been considered to determine potential cumulative impacts. A list of individual cumulative projects was prepared for evaluation in the PEIR. The City of National City Planning Department was contacted to identify individual projects for inclusion in the cumulative analysis. The list of cumulative projects includes projects that are in the planning process, but have not been approved or projects that have been approved, but not constructed. The individual projects that are included in the cumulative analysis are listed in Table 27, Cumulative Projects List. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 150 Table 27 Cumulative Projects List City Case No. Status Location Description S-2003-8 Under Northeast corner of 8`h St. and Proposed development of 34 town PD-2003-6 construction "R" Avenue homes on 1.75 acres GP-2003-6 Approved 101 E. 30th Street Proposed development of 47 CUP-2004-2 condominiums S-2004-3 A-2004-1 S-2004-2 Approved Behind Sheryl Lane near 16th 24 single-family homes PD-2004-2 Street S-2003-1 Approved 915 E. 4`h Street Conversion of 97 apartments to CUP-2003-8 condominiums S-2003-7 Planning process 1905 "J" Avenue/1904 "K" Conversion of 48 apartments to CUP-2003-26 Avenue condominiums S-2003-6 Planning process 1306 E. re Street Conversion of 36 apai truents to CUP-2003-25 condominiums S-2004-4 Planning process 2420 "D" Avenue and 305 Conversion of 72 apartments to CUP-2004-5 E.26th Street condominiums S-2001-3 Planning process Southern terminus of Rachael 40 residential units PUD-2001-1 - on hold Avenue PD-2003-5 Approved Northeast comer of Roosevelt and 7th Street 32 room motel GP-2003-4 Approved — not East side of Highland Avenue 16 single-family homes ZC-2003-3 constructed south of Bueky Lane S-2003-5 Approved — 801 National City Boulevard Red Lion Inn -conversion of 170 CUP-2003-22 completed rooms to condominiums GP-2003-2 A-2003-4 IS-2003-6 S-2003-3 Under West side of I-805 between 28 condominiums IS-2003-2 construction Plaza Boulevard and 12th Street S-2003-2 Under construction South of Sweetwater Road west of Calmoor Street and east of 120 single family condominiums Plaza Bonita Shopping Center S-2000-3 Approved - not constructed Southside of Paradise Valley Road, east of 8`h Street 38 single-family homes S-2000-2 Approved - not constructed 16th and M 9 single-family homes PD-2003-5 Approved Northeast corner of Roosevelt and 7`h Street 32 room Best Western Hotel S-2004-7 Planning process- East side of L Avenue, north of 21 townhomes CUP-2004-17 Council hearing Plaza Boulevard 9/21/04 1b I 11 11 National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 151 t_ h !i c c 5.1.2 Cumulative Impacts Analysis While the extent of environmental changes that will occur with the individual developments identified above may not be significant, the sum of these related projects, including the adoption and implementation of the Downtown Specific Plan, has the potential to create significant cumulative environmental impacts in National City. Based on the analysis contained in Section 4.0 Environmental Impact Analysis, of the PEIR, the project may contribute to cumulative impacts for traffic and circulation, noise, air quality, public services and utilities, population and housing, and recreation. Land Use Development of the cumulative projects will increase the intensity of development in National City providing more of an urbanized feeling. The land use that will experience the largest increase in development is residential. The construction of the cumulative residential projects will result in a increase in residences throughout National City, including condominiums, town homes, and single-family homes. Secondary impacts associated with an increase in residential development will be an increase in noise, increase in traffic that could impact the local circulation system, increase in air emissions, increase in the demand for public services and utilities, and aesthetics. The development of cumulative projects could have positive impacts from a land use standpoint by providing needed housing for the community, reducing blight, and improving the aesthetics of the community. Geology and Soils The cumulative projects are located on sites that are considered as infill. The existing soils and geology conditions in National City as a whole will not impact people or property associated with new development. Standard acceptable design and engineering techniques can be incorporated into the projects, when necessary to correct any geologic or soil condition that could impact future development. Traffic and Circulation The development of the cumulative projects will generate a significant amount of traffic to the circulation system in National City. The cumulative effect could significantly impact city threshold levels of service for specific intersections and roadways. For those projects that significantly impact the roadway system the city will require the project developer to construct the roadway improvements necessary to provide acceptable levels of service. The construction of roadway improvements required by the city will mitigate traffic and circulation impacts. Overall, the cumulative projects will add additional traffic to the circulation system and reduce the carrying capacity of the roadways. Cumulatively the projects will reduce future roadway capacities. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 152 Aesthetics The development of the cumulative projects will intensify the amount of development in National City. For the most part the cumulative projects are proposed for vacant sites, which will replace vacant open space with houses. Although vacant property will be eliminated, the construction of new development consistent with City design guidelines will have positive aesthetic impacts to the immediate vicinity as well as the city overall. Projects that propose to convert hotel rooms or apartments to condominiums could have positive aesthetic impacts associated with upgrades and refurbishment of existing buildings that may need routine maintenance. Overall, the cumulative projects will have a positive aesthetic impact to the community. Noise The short and long-term noise levels that can be expected from the development of the cumulative projects in conjunction with development anticipated in the Project Area could be significant. The cumulative noise during construction will increase the ambient noise level in the vicinity of each project. If several projects are constructed simultaneously in an area the ambient noise level could impact residents. Although the city has noise level criteria that must be met, the short-term cumulative ambient noise impact could be significant. The long-term ambient noise level could also increase and impact area residents and businesses. Additional traffic, operation of mechanical equipment and daily activities will increase the ambient, or background noise level. Although individual projects will have to meet the city's noise criteria, the ambient noise level could, and is expected to increase. Depending upon the increase of the noise level and the proximity of sensitive land uses to the noise sources, the noise impact could be significant. Air Quality The air emissions generated by the cumulative projects will affect the local air quality. The projects will generate both short and long-term air emissions. Short-term air emissions will be generated during construction and increase air emissions in the immediate vicinity. Long-term there will be air emissions generated by both the operation of gas powered furnaces, water heaters and other natural gas appliances along with automobile emissions that will impact local air quality. Because the air quality in the local air basin is non -attainment for CO, cumulative air emissions will future impact this condition. Measures can be incorporated into the projects as much as feasible to reduce air emissions, however, cumulative projects in conjunction with development in the Project Area will have unavoidable adverse CO emission impacts. Hazards and Hazardous Materials The development of cumulative projects could uncover sites that are contaminated. Any contaminated sites that are encountered will have to be remediated in compliance with all applicable city, county, state, and federal laws and regulations. The remediation and clean-up of existing contaminated properties due to the construction of the cumulative projects will have positive cumulative impacts by remediating those properties to comply with current laws and it 1 1 1 L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 153 L regulations. The removal of contamination from properties that have contaminated soils will eliminate the potential for the contamination to expand to surrounding properties. Overall, cumulative development will have a positive impact if they result in the remediation of contaminated property. Population and Housing The population and the number of housing units will increase in National City with development of the cumulative projects. The cumulative impact on population and housing with the development of the cumulative residential projects in conjunction with the residential units allowed by the Specific Plan could result in a significant increase in the population and number of housing units in National City. An increase in the number of residences allowed in National City by the Specific Plan compared to the number of units allowed by the General Plan could have a significant impact on the population of National City. As the population increases the City will have to revise their future population estimates. An increase in the population will result in indirect impacts including increase demand for public services and utilities, increased traffic, etc. However, the population increase will have positive impacts to the local economy due to increased spending by city residents for goods and services. Cultural Resources Most of the cumulative projects are located on vacant sites. Since there are no known archaeological resources in National City the cumulative projects are not anticipated to have any significant impacts to archaeological artifacts. There are both national and local historical buildings in National City, but none of the cumulative projects propose to demolish or remodel any historical properties. The cumulative projects would not have any impacts on historical buildings. Public Services and Utilities The development of the cumulative projects in conjunction with future development in the Project Area will increase the demand on public services and utilities. For those services and utilities that may be near their capacities, additional demand could significantly impact the ability of the service or utility company to meet their respective demand. In the case of water and sewage service, project developers may be required to construct upgrades or extend existing facilities to serve their project. The two school districts that serve National City could be impacted significantly by the cumulative projects since the majority of the cumulative projects are residential. Since all of the schools in National City are either at or over capacity the generation of additional students by the cumulative residential projects will significantly impact schools. School impact fees may not adequately provide the classroom space necessary to serve the number of new students that may be generated. In the case of services such as police and fire, cumulative projects will increase the number of service calls for police and fire protection services. A significant increase in service calls for police and fire protection could reduce response times and impact their ability to respond to top priority service calls in a timely manner. Therefore, there could be a significant cumulative impact in the near future to police and fire service. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 154 Recreation The cumulative residential projects in conjunction with development that is anticipated to occur by the Specific Plan will increase the demand for existing park and recreational facilities in National City. An increase in the demand for and use of existing facilities could significantly impact the city's ability to provide adequate recreational facilities for the community. The City requires developers to pay a parkland fee of $125/unit for residential development. Although the fees are used to provide parkland and/or recreational facilities to serve residents, the lack of available open space to acquire new parkland may significantly impact the city's ability to provide more parkland. Due to the lack of available parkland the city may be restricted to using developer fees to purchase equipment and upgrade existing parks, which may or may not meet the recreational needs of city residents. Although the city requires the payment of developer fees to provide park and recreational facilities, additional parkland may be required and if parkland is not available there could be significant cumulative recreational impacts in the future. While it is speculative at this time to identify and determine which environmental effects will or will not be significantly impacted with cumulative project development (build -out of the Specific Plan and the listed cumulative projects), it can be stated with some certainty that National City will be impacted to some degree. The level of impact and its significance will be based upon the existing conditions and environmental setting in and near each project at the time of development. For those projects that have been approved, but not constructed, it is anticipated that appropriate mitigation measures have been required by the city to be incorporated into the projects accordingly to reduce potential significant environmental effects. For instance, when adequate public services or utilities are not available for a specific project, the city may require the project developer to provide the improvements or services necessary to serve the project and keep pace with development. The cumulative projects could have a significant impact on the existing infrastructure, schools, and park and recreational facilities unless upgrades, improvements or expansions are completed at the time projects are constructed or the city completes the necessary upgrades on a large scale to serve future projects. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 155 1 6.0 GROWTH -INDUCING IMPACTS Section 15126.2(d) of the CEQA Guidelines requires an EIR to discuss the ways in which the proposed project could foster economic or population growth or the construction of additional housing, either directly or indirectly in the surrounding environment. Included in this analysis will be the potential for a project to remove obstacles to population growth. To illustrate this point, the CEQA Guidelines use as an example, the major expansion of a wastewater treatment plant that may allow for more construction and development with the service area. Increases in the population may tax existing community service facilities, requiring construction of new facilities that could cause significant environmental effects. In addition, the growth -inducing effects should include an assessment of how the project may encourage and facilitate other activities that could significantly affect the environment, either individually or cumulatively. The Guidelines further state that it should not be assumed that growth in any area is necessarily beneficial, detrimental, or of little significance to the environment. The following discussion considers ways the proposed National City Downtown Specific Plan could encourage economic or population growth, either directly or indirectly. Generally, growth -inducing impacts refer to impacts from projects that possess such characteristics as being located in isolated, undeveloped or underdeveloped areas, necessitating the extension of major infrastructure (e.g., roadways, sewer and water lines and facilities, etc.) or other services or infrastructure that encourage "premature" or unplanned growth (i.e., "leap frog" development). In addition, projects that induce new development in nearby areas due to the provisions of major infrastructure, employment centers, or residential communities may be considered to have growth -inducing impacts. The objective of the National City Downtown Specific Plan is to reduce and eliminate blight in the Project Area, encourage new development, improve the economic stability of the downtown area of National City, and improve business and pedestrian activity in this area of National City. The adoption and implementation of the National City Downtown Specific Plan will encourage private investments and encourage the Community Development Commission and the City to participate along with the private sector to upgrade and improve properties in the Project Area that are either blighted or under utilized. Upgrading and improving blighted and underutilized properties not only includes remodeling and reconstruction, but also demolition and construction of new buildings. The Specific Plan allows the Community Development Commission, in conjunction with the City, property owners and the private sector, to reduce and eliminate blight and improve the economic viability of the downtown area for the good of the community. The adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan is anticipated to be the impetus to encourage new development in the Project Area since it has not been redeveloped to date by the private community acting alone. Future growth within the Project Area must be consistent with land use and zoning designations allowed by the Specific Plan. Presently the private sector can remove blighted and underutilized buildings and construct new buildings without the Specific Plan. However, the Specific Plan National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 156 will encourage the City and Community Development Commission to participate with the private sector to redevelop properties sooner than may occur by the private sector acting alone. The Specific Plan is considered to be growth inducing because it will encourage new development as well as redevelopment beyond the density allowed by the current General Plan and much sooner. The Specific Plan will encourage new development and redevelopment of blighted and underutilized properties and foster economic and population growth beyond the levels presently experienced in the Project Area. There will be impacts associated with new development and the redevelopment. For the impacts that can be identified at this time, mitigation measures have been recommended in the PEIR to reduce the impacts to levels of insignificance. Most impacts are speculative to identify at this time due to the lack of detailed information for individual projects. The City, or Community Development Commission will evaluate projects for potential impacts in the future at the time they are submitted for approval and additional environmental analysis completed when required to comply with CEQA. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 157 C 7.0 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES In accordance with Section 15126.6(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, an EIR must contain "a range of reasonable alternatives to the project, or to the location of the project, which will feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project," as well as an evaluation of the "comparative merits of the alternatives." In addition, Section 15126.6(b) of the CEQA Guidelines states that "the discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives to the project or its location which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project, even if these alternatives will impede to some degree the attainment of the project objectives, or will be more costly." The PEIR concludes that the proposed National City Downtown Specific Plan will result in significant impacts to geology/soils, traffic and circulation, aesthetics, air quality, hazards and hazardous materials, water service, police service, fire protection, and sewage service; however, mitigation measures will reduce impacts to below a level of significance. No impacts to biological resources were identified and no significant, unavoidable impacts were identified. The alternatives described below have the potential to meet the objectives of the proposed Downtown Specific Plan. Each alternative is considered within the PEIR for its ability to avoid, reduce, or mitigate significant physical environmental effects associated with the proposed Specific Plan, even in the event project objectives may be modified or such alternative is more costly. Two alternatives for the Downtown Specific Plan are considered and discussed in this section. These include the No Project alternative that is mandated by CEQA, and a Larger Project Area alternative. The impacts of each project alternative are analyzed in Sections 7.1 and 7.2 of the PEIR. The review of alternatives includes an evaluation to determine if any specific environmental characteristics will have an effect that is "significantly" different than the proposed project. A significant effect is defined in Section 15382 of the CEQA Guidelines as "a substantial, or potentially substantial, adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project." The discussion of alternatives provides: • A description of alternatives considered; • The identification of the impacts of the alternative; • A comparative analysis of the impacts of the alternative under consideration and the proposed project. The focus of this comparative is to determine if the alternative is capable of eliminating or reducing the significant environmental effects of the proposed project to a less than significant level; • An analysis of whether the alternatives are feasible (as defined by State CEQA Guidelines, Section 15364, meet the objectives of the project (described in Section 3.0 of this EIR), and remain under consideration. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 158 7.1 ALTERNATIVE ONE — NO PROJECT The No Project alternative will eliminate the opportunity for the City of National City and the Community Development Commission to adopt the National City Downtown Specific Plan, eliminating the opportunity for the City and Community Development Commission to assist the private sector with the removal of blighted properties and develop new or remodeled buildings to improve the economic viability of the Project Area. The existing blighted conditions and underutilized parcels of some property in the Project Area will, in all likelihood, remain "as -is" and continue blighted and underutilized into the future. Since blighted and underutilized properties in the Project Area have been slow to redevelop on their own, the trend for the slow improvement of the properties will likely continue. The opportunity for the Community Development Commission and City to participate with a property owner or developer in the rehabilitation and/or demolition of blighted properties will be significantly diminished with the No Project alternative. The Specific Plan is located in a redevelopment project area. This project alternative will prevent the CDC from capturing additional tax increment due to increased development from the Project Area over the life of the current redevelopment plan. The increased tax increment that will be received from the Project Area could be used by the CDC to upgrade and improve the Specific Plan area, including the possible construction of needed public improvements and infrastructure to further assist with implementing the Specific Plan. The No Project alternative will prevent the CDC from collecting increased tax increment due to increased property value possibly preventing the CDC from having monies necessary to assist with the construction of needed public infrastructure improvements and the private community to redevelop properties in the Project Area. The No Project alternative will eliminate the opportunity for both the CDC and the City to participate in the improvement of this downtown area to provide a more pedestrian friendly areas and improve its economic viability. Although the CDC and City can still improve this particular area of the downtown with the No Project, future improvements and upgrades will not have a common design theme as proposed by the Specific Plan. The willingness of the private sector to participate in the redevelopment of the downtown area without possible assistance from CDC and the City may not exist, further delaying the desire and opportunity to eliminate blight and upgrade inadequate public infrastructure, making it more difficult for the City to upgrade and improve the economic and social climate within the Project Area. 7.2 ALTERNATIVE TWO — ADDING AREA This project alternative evaluates adding additional property to the proposed project area, thus increasing the area governed by the specific plan. The existing project area could be expanded to added additional property surrounding the proposed Project Area. The existing property surrounding the Project Area includes residential, commercial, and light industrial uses. Many of the surrounding land uses are very similar to the uses in the proposed Project Area. s tr L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 159 l' t. L The City has determined that the proposed Project Area comprises the core downtown area of National City. Additional properties in the project area would detract from the City's goal of improving the physical and economic viability of the proposed area. Adding additional properties could affect the ability of the city to implement the measures necessary to assist with improving the area. Adding additional area, changing and increasing the land use density similar to the proposed specific plan could significantly increase some of the impacts associated with the current proposal. Although the proposed specific plan will not have any significant adverse impacts, additional impacts due to expanding the project area could generate additional impacts some that could be adverse. The traffic generated by the proposed Specific Plan will impact some intersection in the Project Area. Increasing the density of any added area could reduce the levels of service of some intersections or roadways to unacceptable levels, causing significant traffic impacts. In this case, improvements to the circulation system to mitigate traffic impacts may or may not be feasible due to physical restrictions of the roads and intersections. At this time there is no reason from an environmental standpoint to add additional territory to reduce or eliminate any environmental impacts associated with the proposed Specific Plan. The impacts that have been identified can be mitigated, thus there is no alternative that can reduce or eliminate the impacts while still obtaining the objective of the specific plan, which is to improve the physical and economic viability of downtown National City. Project Alternative Summary This Program EIR provides a range of viable project alternatives to the proposed Specific Plan. The adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will not directly have any significant adverse environmental effects. The Specific Plan will indirectly result in significant environmental effects associated with the future development that is likely to occur based on the land uses and density allowed. The PEIR identifies significant impacts with development consistent with the Specific Plan, however measures are recommended to mitigate the impacts. The project alternatives addressed in this PEIR will not eliminate the indirect significant environmental impacts that could occur with adoption of the Specific Plan. The adoption of the Specific Plan will encourage development in the Project Area. As noted, development consistent with the Specific Plan will result in significant environmental impacts as identified in the PEIR. The only alternative that will eliminate all significant environmental effects associated indirectly with adoption of the Specific Plan is no development. However, no development in the Project Area. is not realistic due to the current interest by the private sector to develop projects. Development will occur in the Project Area whether properties are in a specific plan or not. Thus, there will be environmental impacts independent of whether or not property is guided by a specific plan. Adopting the proposed Specific Plan provides the city a plan for compatible development that will improve the economic viability of the Project Area. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 160 This page intentionally left blank c L 1 E 1 1 L L 11 L 8.0 SIGNIFICANT IRREVERSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGES As required by Section 15126.2(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, the significant effects of a project shall be identified. Irreversible commitments of resources are evaluated to assure that their use is justified. Irreversible environmental changes fall into three categories: primary impacts, such as the use of nonrenewable resources; secondary impacts, such as highway improvements which provide access to previously inaccessible areas; and environmental accidents associated with a project. The adoption of the National City Downtown Specific Plan will not directly have any significant irreversible environmental changes since development will not occur directly upon the approval of the Specific Plan. In the long-term, however, the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan will encourage development consistent with the specific plan. Future development will include remodeling and rehabilitation of existing buildings or the demolition of existing buildings and the construction of new buildings in their place. Development may also include the construction of public projects, including infrastructure improvements such as sewer and water line upgrades, street improvements, etc. The construction of projects is anticipated to have environmental effects as discussed above in Section 4.0 of the Program EIR. It is too speculative at this time to identify the specific irreversible environmental impacts that may occur with the development of future public and private development because plans are not available at this time. The potential environmental impacts that can be identified without speculation have been identified in this EIR and measures suggested as appropriate to reduce potential impacts in compliance with CEQA. Further environmental review of individual private projects may be required by CEQA at the time development plans are submitted to the city for approval. The city will conduct additional environmental analysis as required by CEQA at the time projects are submitted for approval. Potential environmental effects that could be associated with new private projects include increase traffic and traffic congestion, increased air quality emissions during grading and construction and throughout the life of the project, increased noise levels during project grading and construction and throughout the life of the project, land use impacts associated with incompatible land use, and an increased need for public services and utilities that extend beyond their capacity. Once a project is submitted for approval, the city or CDC, as appropriate, will review the project and make a determination whether or not the project could have significant environmental effects as defined by CEQA. If the city or CDC, as appropriate, determines a project could have significant impacts subsequent environmental studies may be required. In that case, the city .will prepare the necessary environmental documents to evaluate the potential impacts in compliance with CEQA. The National City Downtown Specific Plan will have some significant irreversible environmental changes including increased traffic, air emissions and noise. Although the environmental changes and impacts can occur presently if the area were to develop consistent with the General Plan, the proposed Downtown Specific Plan will increase the intensity of land National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 161 uses presently allowed. Therefore, the Downtown Specific Plan will have significant irreversible environmental changes. The environmental changes and impacts that will occur with development consistent with the Specific Plan are not unique, the significance and intensity of the impacts are unique to the intensity proposed. E c 11 c National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 162 9.0 EFFECTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT Based on completion of an Initial Study and Notice of Preparation the following environmental disciplines were identified as not having the potential to be impacted with adoption and implementation of the National City Downtown Specific Plan: energy; mineral resources; biological resources, hydrology/drainage. A copy of the completed Initial Study and associated explanations as to why these environmental disciplines will not be impacted by the adoption and implementation of the Specific Plan is included as Appendix A. National City Downtown Specific Plan Program EIR September 2004 Page 163 10.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED The following persons and organizations were consulted and contacted during the preparation of this Program EIR: Lead Agency/Applicant: Environmental Consultant: Master Planner Community Development Commission of the City of National City Mr. Paul Desrochers CDC Consultant 140 E. 12th Street, Suite B National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4250 Mr. Oliver Mujica Redevelopment Consultant Municipal Resource Center 21781 Tabarra Mission Viejo, CA 92692 (949)285-6295 Phil Martin Phil Martin & Associates 18195 Mc Durmott East, Suite C Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 250-0503 Michael Stepner, FAIA, FAICP Stepner Design Group 3636 Fifth Avenue, Suite 100 San Diego, CA 92103 (619) 234-2112 L c E 1 L National City Downtown Specific Plan Program FIR September 2004 Page 164 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT FETING DATE May 17, 2005 23 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE Public Hearing — Conditional Use Permit for the Sale of Beer and Wine and for Karaoke at� Casa Del Taco Restaurant at 1635 Sweetwater Road (Applicant: Cesar Carrillo) (Case file no.: CUP-2005-1) PREPARED BY Martin Reeder, 336-4310 DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this item at their March 21, 2005 meeting, where the commissioners voted to approve the requested Conditional Use Permit. City Council set the item for hearing at their April 19, 2004 meeting. The attached background report describes the proposal in detail. i CEnvironmental Review {Financial Statement N/A X N/A Categorical Exemption >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approved By: Finance Director Account No. Staff recommends approval based on the attached findings and conditions of approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission approved the Conditional Use Permit. Ayes: Alvarado, Flores, Martinelli, Graham Nays: Pruitt, Baca Reynolds Absent: Saludares Abstain: Carrillo ATTA_CHMEENTprt ( Listed Below ) r. Background Repo 2. Planning Commission Reso No. 8-2005 with Findings for Approval Ls. 3. Possible Findings for Approval 4. Recommended Conditions of Approval 5. Location Map and Site photographs 6 C....... T*.ct 14,p A-200 (9r99) 7. Hearing notice 8. Community Meeting flyer, sign -in sheet, meeting minutes 9. Public Petitions 10. Proposed exemption 11. Police Department comments 1 Appliratinn with prrtie t plans Resolution No. BACKGROUND REPORT Casa del Taco is a full service restaurant located in the General Commercial (CG) Zone on the north side of Sweetwater Road between Grove Street and Prospect Street. It is a 1,190 square foot suite within an 8,320 square foot building within Sweetwater Plaza. The restaurant has a 40 seat inside dining area of approximately 624 square -feet, and a 20 seat outside dining area of 190 square feet. There is currently a building permit under review for an expansion into the suite next door (shown on CUP plans) to add another 530 square feet and 40 inside dining seats for a total of 100 seats. The total suite area would be 1,760 square feet. Nearby business within the center include Goodyear Tires, Hollywood Video and Super Sergio's Mexican Food. There is also a barber shop, photo studio, insurance office, and salon nearby. A Conditional Use Permit for the sale of beer and wine for Old Recipes at the adjacent Sweetwater Medical Plaza was approved in June of 2004. The applicant proposes to sell beer and wine between the hours of 9 a.m. and 10 p.m. daily. Alcohol is proposed to be served both inside the dining area and outside on the patio. Beer and wine will be stored in the kitchen and will only be brought by an L.E.A.D. (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) certified server. Beer will be sold only by the bottle and wine only by the glass. The applicant states no alcohol will be sold with takeout; the ABC license will be for on -site consumption only. Karaoke is also proposed from 5 p.m. until closing. The applicant has stated that this is primarily for special occasions such as parties or birthdays. The karaoke machine to be used is self-contained (see attachment with application) including the speaker and a disc player with inputs to a television. The dimensions are 18.5 inches wide by 12.5 inches deep by 15 inches high. The machine is to be located in the existing dining area near the restroom (see attached plans). Although there is no stage area, clients would likely congregate in the area of the machine in order to use it. In order to .alleviate noise concerns, a condition of approval was added to limit karaoke to inside the restaurant only, not on the patio, as well as to two evenings a week. As part of the Conditional Use Permit process for the sale of beer and wine, the applicant is required to hold a community meeting prior to a hearing being set. The meeting was held on Tuesday, February 22, 2005 from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. to address any potential public concerns. The meeting was advertised through postings at the Chamber of Commerce and hand delivery of flyers to the surrounding neighborhood. Copies of flyer also distributed to Frank Lopez of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs Taskforce, who was present at the meeting, as well as other City, civic, and educational organizations as required by City policy. According to the applicant, eight people attended this meeting. A copy of the advertisement, as well as a sign -in sheet and a copy of the minutes, is attached. The Land Use Code requires that businesses selling alcohol be a minimum distance from schools of 660 feet. Casa del. Taco is approximately 2,500 feet from the nearest school (Sweetwater Union High School). A community meeting was held Tuesday, February 22, 2005 from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. eight people were in attendance. The meeting was advertised at the Chamber of Commerce and through flyers distributed around the surrounding area. Frank Lopez of the National City Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drugs Taskforce was also notified of meeting and was in attendance. Although the restaurant is not in a primary area of pedestrian traffic and is near the rear of the shopping center, there are still students and children walking home past the center on the street nearby. Consequently, it may be easy for someone dining in the patio area to pass a beverage to someone walking past. Conditions of approval will require signage stating that alcoholic beverages must be consumed in the restaurant or patio area and may not be removed from the premises. In addition, Planning Commission required a condition that the patio be enclosed prior to serving alcohol there (Condition no. 6). The sale of beer and wine is not expected to have an adverse effect on adjacent and nearby uses. The closest residences are approximately 100 feet away to the north in Lincoln Acres, but are considerably higher in elevation and are to the rear of Casa del Taco. Additionally, restaurant uses are already common in the area; availability of beer and wine at full service restaurants (Casa De Oro, El Puente, Old Recipes, etc) is typical rather than an exception. To date, the previously mentioned approval of a CUP at Old Recipes for beer and wine and karaoke has not resulted in any reported problems associated with the business. Conditions of Approval coupled with the physical separation from residential uses, and the established commercial nature of the area should alleviate the potential for deleterious effects to adjacent uses. State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) guidelines allow for three on -sale licenses (restaurant, bar), and two off -sale licenses (market, liquor store) in this area; the area being census tract 122.00 (see attached census tract map). According to ABC and City records, there are currently five off - sale and seven on -sale licenses in the area. These numbers reflect the removal from ABC's list of Korea House Restaurant in the Town & Country Shopping Center. This building has been converted into medical offices and is no longer serving alcohol. The Police Department has recommended the denial of this application (see attached Police comments) due to: • No finding of public convenience or necessity. • An unacceptable number of service calls in the area and gang activity concerns. • High pedestrian and vehicle traffic area. • The open-air patio is not consistent with the ideals of alcohol consumption. City Council first considered this project at their April 19, 2005 meeting and, prior to setting the item for hearing, suggested the following conditions: • No "Happy Hour" (added as a new condition - #7). • No beer served in pitchers (already covered by condition #5). • All servers must be at least 21 years of age (condition # 9 amended to include this). • No alcohol to be sold past 10 p.m. (already covered by condition #4). • No alcohol in patio area (already covered by condition #6). • No alcohol sold without food (added as a new condition - #11). As previously indicated, karaoke is proposed as part of this request. It is possible that some customers may come to the restaurant only to sing and enjoy a beverage. This may make enforcement of condition # 11 difficult. RESOLUTION NO. 8-2005 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AND FOR KARAOKE AT CASA DEL TACO RESTAURANT AT 1635 SWEETWATER ROAD APPLICANT: CESAR CARRILLO CASE FILE NO. CUP-2005-1 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Conditional Use Permit application for the sale of beer and wine and for karaoke at Casa Del Taco Restaurant at 1635 Sweetwater Road at a duly advertised public hearing held on March 21, 2005, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WHEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the staff report contained in Case File No. CUP-2005-1, maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on March 21, 2005, support the following findings: 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption will be in an established restaurant, that is currently undergoing expansion, at Sweetwater Plaza Shopping Center, as shown on submitted plans. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the restaurant is existing and the addition of accessory alcohol sales will not substantially affect traffic. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the restaurant is located in a fully -developed commercial area, and since karaoke will be limited to indoor space. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since it will contribute to the viability of the restaurant, an established and allowed use in the applicable commercial zone. 5. That public convenience and necessity may be served by a proposed use of the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Conditional Use Permit is approved subject to the following conditions: 1. This Conditional Use Permit authorizes the sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption and for karaoke at Casa del Taco Restaurant. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibits A -Revised, case file no. 2005-1, dated 1/31/2005. 2. Plans must comply with the 2001 editions of the California Building Code, the California Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Electrical Code, and California Title 24 energy and handicapped regulations. 3. Permittee shall comply with all regulatory provisions of the Business and Professions Code, section 25600 through 25667, currently in effect or as may be amended, regarding sales, displays and marketing or merchandising of alcoholic beverages. 4. The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. 5. Beer shall be served by the bottle only and wine only by the glass. 6. No alcoholic beverages shall be served or consumed in the patio area unless it is enclosed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 7. Signs shall be posted in the patio dining area indicating that alcoholic beverages must be consumed inside the restaurant or patio area and may not betaken off premises. 8. All persons who will be serving alcoholic beverages should receive L.E.A.D. (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training in Responsible Beverage Service from the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control or Responsible Hospitality Coalition. 9. Two members of staff who are L.E.A.D. (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) certified shall be present outside the restaurant at closing time to ensure that patrons leave the premises in a timely and orderly fashion. 10. The sale of alcohol shall not exceed the sale of food. With the annual renewal of the City business license, the business proprietor shall submit a statement clearly indicating total alcoholic beverage sales and total food sales. Said statement shall be subject to audit and verification by employees of the City, who are authorized to examine, audit and inspect such books and records of the license, as may be necessary in their judgment to verify that the sale of alcohol does not exceed the sale of food. All information obtained by an investigation of records shall remain confidential. 11. The rear door(s) of the premises shall be kept closed at all times during the operation of the business except in case of deliveries or emergencies. 12. No coin operated amusement devices shall be operated on the licensed premises. 13. Exterior advertising and signs of all types, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic. beverages, including advertising/signs directed to the exterior from within, are prohibited. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages and signs, which are clearly visible to the exterior, shall constitute a violation of this condition. 14. Karaoke is permitted only in the indoor restaurant area and is prohibited in the patio. 15. Karaoke shall be limited to no more than two evenings a week. 16. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 17. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 18. This permit shall expire if the use authorized by this resolution is discontinued for a period of 12 months or longer. This permit may also be revoked, pursuant to provisions of the Land Use Code, if discontinued for any lesser period of time. 19. This Conditional Use Permit shall expire two years from the date of adoption of this Resolution. BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE 1T FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. CERTIFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of April 4, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: ALVARADO, FLARES, MARTINELLI, GRAHAM NAYS: PRUITT, BACA, REYNOLDS ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SALUDARES CARRILLO CHAIRWOMAN POSSIBLE FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL 1. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption will be in an established restaurant, which is currently undergoing expansion, at Sweetwater Plaza Shopping Center, as shown on submitted plans. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since the restaurant is existing and the addition of accessory alcohol sales will not substantially affect traffic. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the restaurant is located in a fully -developed commercial area, and since karaoke will be limited to indoor space. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since it will contribute to the viability of the restaurant, an established and allowed use in the applicable commercial zone. 5. That public convenience and necessity may be served by a proposed use of' the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL 1. That public convenience and necessity is not served by a proposed use of the property for the retail sales of alcoholic beverages pursuant to law. 2. That the proposed use is not deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since the area is already served by businesses which serve beer and wine for sale in a restaurant. POSSIBLE CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL 1. This Conditional Use Permit authorizes the sale of beer and wine for on -site consumption and for karaoke at Casa del Taco Restaurant. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibits A -Revised, case file no. 2005-1, dated 1/31/2005. 2. Plans must comply with the 2001 editions of the California Building Code, the California Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Electrical Code, and California Title 24 energy and handicapped regulations. 3. Permittee shall comply with all regulatory provisions of the Business and Professions Code, section 25600 through 25667, currently in effect or as may be amended, regarding sales, displays and marketing or merchandising of alcoholic beverages. 4. The sale of alcoholic beverages shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m. 5. Beer shall be served by the bottle only and wine only by the glass. 6. No alcoholic beverages shall be served or consumed in the patio area unless it is enclosed to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 7. No "Happy Hour", or other designated time where alcoholic beverages are sold at a discount, is allowed. S. Signs shall be posted in the patio dining area indicating that alcoholic beverages must be consumed inside the restaurant or patio area and may not be taken off premises. 9. All persons who will be serving alcoholic beverages should receive L.E.A.D. (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training in Responsible Beverage Service from the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control or Responsible Hospitality Coalition, and be at least 21 years of age. 10. Two members of staff who are L.E.A.D. (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) certified shall be present outside the restaurant at closing time to ensure that patrons leave the premises in a timely and orderly fashion. 11. No alcohol shall be available without the purchase of food. 12. The sale of alcohol shall not exceed the sale of food. With the annual renewal of the City business license, the business proprietor shall submit a statement clearly indicating total alcoholic beverage sales and total food sales. Said statement shall be subject to audit and verification by employees of the City, who are authorized to examine, audit and inspect such books and records of the license, as may be necessary in their judgment to verify that the sale of alcohol does not exceed the sale of food. All information obtained by an investigation of records shall remain confidential. 13. The rear door(s) of the premises shall be kept closed at all times during the operation of the business except in case of deliveries or emergencies. 14. No coin operated amusement devices shall be operated on the licensed premises. 15. Exterior advertising and signs of all types, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages, including advertising/signs directed to the exterior from within, are prohibited. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages and signs, which are clearly visible to the exterior, shall constitute a violation of this condition. 16. Karaoke is permitted only in the indoor restaurant area and is prohibited in the patio. 17. Karaoke shall be limited to no more. than two evenings a week. 18. Before this Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Conditional Use Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 19. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Section 18.116.190 of the Municipal Code. 20. This permit shall expire if the use authorized by this resolution is discontinued for a period of 12 months or longer. This permit may also be revoked, pursuant to provisions of the Land Use Code, if discontinued for any lesser period of time. 21. This Conditional Use Permit shall expire two years from the date of adoption of this Resolution. 0 J Q 0 z Patio area (Calif_ Adjacent business to the west 1340.„ - • , • „ . • AdjacPn business to south Adjacent business to south IIIEaiaip,l me wainifilir 11MIIIIMMIW. I a III — Be .1 t 1111/ , L.11.11 5 snipe .2 71111 a me /NEM in, re p-, pie t, y aim, mi , ir. r. fl, . i -iiiminrj Ais , rA.,,worfararranammonic -v.., •., -,,emotimmi.......2... 441 L 0. ilrmu===s2 1 ir= moria... -,—,,....,_.......„,_____. . . ...„.....1= —...= ............ ,..:,.„,,,e47,..... ...„..., I; ..... ,1_11,11•11111111 N: , 41c.: i Ell Mii.r. ..1 MEMINIMIIIIIIIM /0 i : MIMI= 1611 11" idlINIMII NMI City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AND FOR KARAOKE AT CASA DEL TACO RESTAURANT AT 1635 SWEETWATER ROAD CASE FILE NO.: CUP-2005-1 The National City Planning Commission will hold a public hearing after the hour of 6:00 p.m. Monday, March 21, 2005, in the City Council Chambers, Civic Center, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, California, on the proposed Conditional Use Permit (Applicant: Cesar Carrillo). Any person interested in this matter may appear at the above time and place and be heard. The applicant proposes to sell beer and wine for on -site consumption in conjunction with food service at Casa del Taco Restaurant. Beer and wine would be served in both the inside dining area and in an outside patio. Karaoke is proposed only inside the restaurant. Members of the public are invited to comment. Written comments should be received by the National City Planning Department on or before 5:30 p.m., March 21, 2005. If you challenge the nature of the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the public hearing entity conducting the hearing at, or prior to, the public hearing. NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT , /:?ovre ROGER G. POST Planning Director PUBLISH IN THE NATIONAL CITY STAR NEWS Friday, March 11, 2005 CASA DEL TACO RESTAURANT LOCATED AT: 1635 SWEETWATER ROAD, SUITE A NATIONAL CITY, CA 91950 INVITES YOU TO A COMMUNITY MEETING For a presentation and to answer any questions regarding an application for a Beer & Wine License TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2005 4PM-6PM At the National City Chamber of Commerce Conference Room 901 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 For more Information, please call 619-336-1730 Casa Del Taco Community Meeting February 22,2005 4PM-6PM • Agenda • Introduction • History of Casa Del Taco • Need for License (karaoke/ beer and wine) • Question and Answer • Conclusion Casa Del Taco Community Meeting - Minutes February 22, 2005 (4PM-6PM) National City Chamber of Commerce 901 National City Boulevard Introduction and presentation of agenda for meeting Introduction of members of the public and representatives of Casa Del Taco Introduction and brief history of Casa Del Taco by Cesar Carrillo Frank Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: Guilte Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: Guille Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: What are hours? Sunday -Thursday 9AM-10PM, Friday -Saturday 9AM-12Midnight There are many customers that loiter from Super Sergio and many that come from Plum Loco, How do you deal with them? We have a good relationship with Super Sergio's, however, we have a different clientele than they do and we are a sit down restaurant with servers. My concern is with your hours of operation and the high school students that walk down by the commercial center where your located and the patio you have. We are currently in the process of enclosing the patio to control the outside better, and have the support of the shopping center. The size of the location looks small and Title 18 requires that a minimum of the restaurant dining be 30% of the restaurant, what is the percentage at your restaurant? 1 am not sure, we will respond to you later this week. There have been problems and disturbances at Super Sergio's, we feel that it may impact your restaurant. The problems that you talk about are not too common, maybe on the weekends, but not at Casa Del Taco. How will license reduce crime in that area? I can't say that it will reduce crime, but we will not be the cause of added crime to the area. How will you sell/serve alcohol? We will serve by the bottle and by the glass. Who will serve alcohol? Only managers will serve alcohol. Will you have self -serve alcohol? No, we provide a family atmosphere for our clients. Heydi Q: Will managers take lead courses? Cesar: A: Yes. Frank: Q: Where will you store your excess alcohol? Cesar A: We have a storage area in the back of the restaurant. Frank Q: Cesar A: Can you explain your need for a karaoke license? We will use for special occasions, such as birthday parties. Heydi Q: Cesar A: No. Will there be a charge for the use of the Karaoke machine. Guilte Q: What is the size of the expansion? Cesar A: 600 square feet. Frank Commentary: The crime statistics for the area are very high, and currently ABC allows for 4 and there are currently 2 located in the area, we feel that it is a temptation for our youth and we have heard from previous providers that they are committed to our community, only to let us down. Cesar Response: I can comment on our history. Our intentions and commitment is to our customers and neighbors and we want to create an atmosphere that is nice to those who enjoy our food. We want to supplement our menu and business with a beer and wine license for our customers. It is not just alcohol, it is also our expansion to be a full service restaurant. Heydi Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: No. Frank Q: Cesar A: Maria G. Q: Cesar A: Maria G, Q: Cesar A: Guilte Q: Cesar A: Frank Q: Cesar A: We've heard that profit is a motivation, but at what cost? Sometimes an adult purchases alcohol and it ends up with minors and we lose lives. It is not just about alcohol, it's about diversifying our business and maintaining relevance within our industry and part of our overall business plan. Do you have plans to apply for a liquor license? Will karaoke add to your parking situation problems? There are many areas to park in the center, and the parking situation is excasberated due to employee's parking in the center and we are talking to the center's management to request that employees parking elsewhere. Who will maintain order in the patio? Management will control the outside. Do you sell alcohol "to -go?" No. Would you sell alcohol with food? Yes, always with food. Would you accept a condition to have a (3) alcoholic beverage maximum per customers? I would have to discuss this with my family and partners. Meeting concludes at 5:20PM Casa Del Taco Research studies have found that by adding a single alcohol outlet: 2.7 additional motor vehicle accidents occur (Scribner, 1999) 3.4 additional assaults occur (Scribner, 1999) 5% increase risk of murder (Roncek/Maier, 1991) Increase violent crimes committed by youth (AlanizJParker, 1998) NCATOD Recommendations 1. RBS LEAD Training, Persons serving alcohol to be at least 21 years of age or older. 2. Prohibit the sale of alcoholic beverages to be served in containers of more than 12 ounces. 3. The sale of alcoholic beverages in pitchers will be prohibited. 4. Prohibit the sale of over ice buckets of alcoholic beverages. 5. Prohibit the over Ice display of alcoholic beverages. 6. Beer and wine shall be stored in the kitchen area and shall be served by the host/hostess upon request. 7. The quarterly gross sale of alcoholic beverages not to exceed gross food sales. 8. Prohibit the patrons from walking or standing with alcoholic beverage in hand. 9. Prohibit the Alcoholic Products advertising and promotions. 10. No Alcoholic beverages to be served in patio area. Concerns: 1. Parking 2 Establishments size 3. Youth congregating in the parking lot 4. Personal Observations from NCPD 5. Gang element is a growing concern 6. Traffic 7. One more alcohol outlet is adding fuel to the fire 8. We need to reduce overall crime in National City. 2/21/05 Coco.' ww l'itco a\a,aSos- --- SIGNI --Csa SILAW-- --- _ �.r �_ t) <-Lo#t-- — ,) fro-v - - ZC�C$scs .c. (c vat, .407 avolt Rci . (C rssi Jhc 3344,� Gii oemmivids — rCee»ati debt vc,sd Abets to t V T at ?oily 4TAZ. rlo & e; ad. 4.- . 0%wa s gS4r-7Vgo S) O lit na..4s� tfAe ao.. 1ct .6) uctl� •40 974-/3 * 9) 46 4eicL° A. AL„ o eS 'Y r -- b')Rt 7 7) , j,L �4. NG. Nil- "7j 2) .tW4 (AeGr►s eaiertds e GlF, .24,,- C .= • • 1 . PETITION IN SUPPORT OF CASA DEL TACO As a business owner on Sweetwater Road, I am supportive of Casa Del Taco's applications for a Beer and Wine License and Karaoke Permit at 1635 Sweetwater Road, National City, CA 91950: Name 1. 9. Signature 12. I�CN �4P1CK/ , `��� �S-rt�C 13. plot ' oaa toomtv 15.' a,.. you\Sav, 16. 17 18. S'r/pr ✓ SPIT; AS T/rr-a Business Date ® Sr c Marc • /AC&S /9/ea 5— O a-2r_o S a3`2.'4r-- u0•9! t6 �rl1AAfit' 3 5 'k +Z•I(CIS Ge.4.4ev 's 3bijoS . *los- 44,F.wnt Yi �C GY wit q.z. (I Q�r � ,.�^ frkmpJJatd C' dv 3-..l-05 19. 20. HANDOUT ITEM NO.. 6 March 21, 2005 City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd National City, CA 91950 211WR 2005 p 411:46 1635 Sweetwater Road, Suite D National City, CA 91950 March 15, 2005 Re: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE AND FOR KARAOKE AT CASA DEL TACO RESTAURANT AT 1635 SWEETWATER ROAD, CASE FILE NO.: CUP-2005-1 Gentlemen: As local business entrepreneurs within the same location of the Casa Del Taco Restaurant, we standunited in totally and vigorously objecting to its proposed permit for the sale of beer and wine. Sale of beer and wine exposes and makes our businesses vulnerable to vandalisms and other vices related to the consumption of alcohol. Property insurance coverage and premiums would also tend to go up. Sale and consumption of beer and wine would also detract from our reputation of being a pretty quiet, nice, clean and happy location. They would also remove the "family" atmosphere in our area since children would be exposed to the consumption of alcohol nearby. Casa Del Taco Restaurant and the rest of us do not have the resources to police our area during business and after hours to prevent the occurrences of vice. Although we do not object to the request for karaoke, we strongly reject to the sale and consumption of beer and wine in our neighborhood. Sincerely, S b ) /c n (ci 0/134H1 ar 1&44/fM/ Jet zApiS IRet(il L ei(eG Alf g5V-rI City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO: County Clerk County of San Diego P.O. Box 1750 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 260 San Diego, CA 92112 Proiect Title: CUP-2005-1 Proiect Location: 1635 Sweetwater Road, National City, CA 91950 Contact Person: Martin Reeder Telephone Number: (619) 336-4315 Description of Nature. Purpose and Beneficiaries of Proiect: Conditional Use Permit for beer and wine sales and for karaoke in an existing restaurant. Applicant: Telephone Number: Cesar Carrillo (619) 336-1730 1635 Sweetwater Road, Ste A National City, CA 91950 Exempt Status: ❑ Statutory Exemption. (State type and Section No., if applicable) ® Categorical Exemption. Class 1 Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) ® Not a project as defined in Section 15332 of CEQA ❑ Not subject to CEQA (Sec. 15061b3) Reasons why project is exempt: The project will result in no changes to the physical environment, since the proposal involves the sale of beer and wine and for karaoke in an existing restaurant. Date: MARTIN REEDER Planning Technician ® Recycled Paper NATIO CITY POLICE DEPA TMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: 02/16/05 TO: Planning Department - Martin Reeder FROM: Sgt. L. Brent Roark SUBJECT: Case File Number CUP-2005-1 After careful consideration of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application for a conditional use permit for the sale of beer and wine at Casa del Taco, 1635 Sweetwater Road, Suite A, the National City Police Department opposes the granting of such permit. The Department's decision is based upon the following factors: 1. No finding of public convenience and necessity. 2. An unacceptable number of calls for service in the immediate area in which alcohol consumption played a factor. 3. An ongoing concern of gang activity in the immediate area coupled with the knowledge and experience of the role alcohol plays within the gang culture. 4. The immediate area is one with a high concentration of vehicular and pedestrian traffic on weekend nights consisting of youths (18-25 years), many of whom have already been consuming alcoholic beverages. 5. The outside "open air patio" design of the establishment is not consistent with the ideals of alcohol consumption as it relates to the spirit and intent of existing local codes and desires of law enforcement. trative i Sergeant Ulf NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA APPLICATION for Conditional Use Permit Planned Development Permit Planned Unit Development Permit • Make checks payable to the City of National City File application with the: National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 (619) 336-4310 PLEASE DO NOT USE BLUE INK WHEN COMPLETING THIS FORM FOR DEPARTMENT USE ONLY Case Number 6t4 i o — 20 d S — ( Filing Fee S 1, 3 )-S = Receipt No. Date Received I Ill 107 By /M -ram E.A.F. Required N (4 Fee $ Related Cases LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: (Attach if insufficient space) Sew A D re, ITS PROPERTY LOCATION 1 %S5 SiNe641 A ¢.. Rom,Ar No. Street between Euclid -4VE-I•lid and 4e_ofei— COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ZONING DESIGNATION C Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 1 of 4 REQUEST: The Applicant requests a Conditional Use Permit (Chapter 18.116), Planned Development Permit (Chapter 18.126), or Planned Unit Development Permit (Chapter 18.30) to use the above described property for the following purposes: PROPERTY OWNER(S) of all property included in this application: (Attached extra sheets if necessary). Name: Cpe CtAg44 i.LO Signa ,Q,Uk Si acknowl- . ges that application is being filed) Name: Signature (Signature acknowledges that this application is being filed) Address: 1(03SSAteAutic Teo5k/1-Address: tJc i Cily , CA- 9Iq z, Phone No. ()Ik) 33Q, I �".3 Fax No. Date: co I Phone No. Fax No. Date: Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 2 of 4 1 • APPLICANT Name: c`„ Pam. C .Ae q 1 1-1.0 (Please type or print) (Si _a • : certifies that the informon submitted with this application is true and accurate to the best of the applicant's knowledge). Address: I%3S Sw Torn I f Eio1J1m...- e / GA- Qtl415-0 Phone No. C& let) 33(0 — 11-30 Fax No. Date: 61� Conditional Use/Planned Development/Planned Unit Development Permit Application Revised December, 1998 Page 3 of 4 ,I5036 a "EXHIBIT A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN IS SITUATED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAID DIEGO, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A: s PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 14863, IN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, JUNE 26,1987 AS FILE NO. 87-359057 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ' PARCEL B: NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENTS FOR THE PURPOSES OF (1) FURNISHING ACCESS AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS BETWEEN (A) THE PUBLIC STREETS AND (B) ANY PARKING AREAS SITUATED WITHIN SAID LAND DESCRIBED AS THE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY, AND BETWEEN (C) THE PUBLIC STREETS AND PARKING AREAS AND THE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY; (2) PARKING OF. VEHICLES OF THE TENANTS, CONCESSIONAIRES, OR THE OWNERS OF ANY PORTION OF THE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY; TN, B CUSTOMERS, LICENSEES, AND INVITEES OF THE OWNERS TENANTS, CONCESSIONAIRES, OR SUBLESSEES; LIMITED, HOWEVER, FOR PURPOSES CONNECTED WITH OR INCIDENTAL TO ANY USE BEING MADE OF THE ANY PORTION OF THE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY. THE PARKING AREA EASEMENTS ARE EASEMENTS ON BACH AND ALL OF THE ONE OR MORE PORTIONS OF THE SHOPPING CENTER PROPERTY AS IS OR IMPROVED BY ANY OWNER FROM TIME TO TIME FOR THE PARKING OR ACCOMMODATION OF VEHICLES; AND (3) PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC OF CUSTOMERS, INVITEES AND LICENSEES OF THE OWNER; THE TENANTS, CONCESSIONAIRES, OR OWNERS OF ANY PORTION OF THE PROPERTY, AND THE CUSTOMERS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES, LICENSEES, AND INVITEES OF THE OWNER AND TENANTS OR CONCESSIONAIRES, LIMITED, HOWEVER, FOR THE PURPOSES 'CONNECTED WITH OR INCIDENTAL TO ANY USE THEN BEING MADE OF THE OWNER'S PROPERTY. THE COMMON AREA EASEMENTS ON EACH AND ALL OF THE ONE OR MORE PORTIONS OF THE SHOPPING CENTERS PROPERTY (OTHER THAN THE MOTOR VEHICLE PARKING AREAS) AS IS OR ARE PROVIDED OR AVAILABLE FOR GENERAL USE AND THE CONVENIENCE OF TENANTS OF THE SHOPPING CENTER AND • CONCESSIONAIRES, EMPLOYEES, AND CUSTOMERS OF THE SHOPPING CENTER AS SUCH PORTIONS MAY BE MADE AVAILABLE AND DESIGNATED FROM TIME TO TIME FOR THESE PURPOSES BY ANY OWNER, AS EACH SUCH PORTION OR PORTIONS SO MADE AVAILABLE AND DESIGNATED FROM TIME TO TIME BE REDUCED OR INCREASED IN SIZE OR RELOCATED BY ANY OWNER, ALL AS BEING SET FORTH, CONVEYED•AND FURTHER DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN = =- • RECIPROCAL GRANT OF EASEMENTS RECORDED JUNE 26,1987 AS FILE NO. 87359058 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. • 0 • "Exhibit B" Casa Del Taco is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a Beer and Wine license as an extended service for its clientele. Casa Del Taco is a full service restaurant with professional servers that will undergo Department of Alcohol Beverage and Control LEAD training. All proposed alcohol that will be sold will be stored in refrigerators behind the cashier counter and not accessible to the customers. All proposed sales of alcohol will be served with food. All proposed sale of beer will be in single servings and all wine will be served by the glass. The hours of operation are SUN-THUR: 9AM-10PM / FRI-SAT: 9AM-12 Midnight. JOCOPRO COLT 160W DIGITAL CONTROL CD+G KARAOKE MA l i SYSTEM - HVCP... Page 1 of GO Advanced Search r_;t i,_tai —Select— $0 - $50 $51 - $100 $101 - $200 $201 - $300 $301 - $400 $401 - $500 $501 - $1000 $1001 - $2000 Accessories All -In -One Systems Chinese Karaoke Club Systems Computer Karaoke DVD/CD+G/VCD Players English Karaoke CDG English Karaoke DVD English Karaoke VCD VOCOPRO COLT 160W DIGITAL KEY CONTROL CD+G KARAOKE Flipino Karaoke MACHINE SYSTEM International Karaoke Japanese Karaoke In Stock Karaoke Mixers KJ/DJ Lighting Equipment Y Korean Karaoke Latin/Spanish Karaoke Product Options Microphones Mixing Amplifiers Package Specials Package Includes: Portable Karaoke Machine Speakers Sound Choice Sampler Pack 0 Super CD+G Vietnamese Karaoke VocoPro Shipping & Return Policy Email Product List FAQ Privacy Policy Terms Of Use Detailed Description Email this to a friend Your Price $499.00 Qty 1 HVCPAICOL1 HVCPAICOL1 160W Digital Key Control CD/CDG Karaoke System VocoPro's Colt is the new compact and powerful CD/CD+G Karaoke system for home use, or the party rental market! The Colt is equipped with state- of-the-art Karaoke features as found in professional Karaoke and PA systems. Ittp://www.nonstopkaraoke.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=481 1/21/200: IOCOPRO COLT 160W DIGITAL CONTROL CD+G KARAOKE MACHINE SYSTEM - HVCP... Page 2 of for use wit TV without AN input NTSC RF INPUT VIDEO (PAL/NTSC SWITCHABLE) komAl eitt 411 "40-41)qp.mwri... C,1 :7 e1 MD PLAYER A/V OUTPUT DVD PLAYER r TAPE DECK RECORD INPUT ®•es•0 11 AUDIO OUTPUT t AUDIO INPUT AN OUTPUT LASER DISC PLAYER eeee•..eeaee _ RECEIVER / AMPLIFIER (OPTIONAL) • 80W + 80W Maximum Power Output • 19 Step Digital Key Controller • Professional Digital Echo With Digital Repeat Controls • 2 Microphone Inputs With Individual Volume Controls • Vocal Cancel And Vocal Partner Functions To Remove Vocal On Karaoke CDs And Tapes • Skip Free Shock Resistant CD/CD+ Graphics Player • Audio/Video Input/Output Jacks Easily Connect To Other Systems • Built In RF Output For TV's Without A/V Input Jacks • PAL/NTSC Switchable For Both US and European TV Systems • 110V/220V Switchable • Dimension: (W x D x H) 18 1/2" x 12 1/2" x 15" • Net Weight : 30 Lbs. Package Included: • 6 Free Sound Choice Sampler Pack home I company info I contact us I customer login I view cart I track order I site map rttp://www.nonstopkaraoke.com/index.asp?PageAction=VIEWPROD&ProdID=481 1/21/200: Y 1 �.� �I.�\I•= II `11I.\III.\�%��.��� �i<� 24141 ParkingLot 11.0' NATIONAL CITY PLANNING DEPT. EXHIBIT A - REVISED CASE FILE NO. CUP-2005-1 DATE: 1/31/2005 utA "Ntbiinij %/ 4' "$-.• - 1 it III II I S.IEETINO DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT SECOND READING 24 AGENDA ITEM NO. (ITEM TITLE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.52.010 OF THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO -RELATED PRODUCTS IN OUTDOOR RECREATION AREAS AND FACILITIES PREPARED BY George H. Eiser, III lt DEPARTMENT City Attomey EXT. 4221 o ExpuNATION At the April 19, 2005 City Council meeting, the Council directed that an ordinance be prepared to prohibit the use of tobacco and tobacco -related products in the City's outdoor recreation areas and facilities. Gott' courses would be exempted from the prohibition. Section 10.52.010 of the Municipal Code sets forth the activities which are prohibited in any city park, playground, golf course, or recreation facility. The proposed ordinance would amend Section 10.52.010 to add Subsection HH thereto, to prohibit in these facilities, except golf courses, possession of a lighted or buming tobacco product or tobacco -related product, including but not limited to cigars, cigarettes and pipes; use, induding chewing of tobacco or tobacco -related products; disposal of any lighted or unlighted tobacco or tobacco -related product in any place other than a designated waste disposal container. i (nvIronm.ntaI Review X N/A rElminshditatemant N/A >STAPP RECOMMENDATION Adopt ordinance. MIS Approval Approved By: Mona Director Account No. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A itt... ATTACHMENTS (• Listed Below) Resolution No. Proposed ordinance M200 (Rat 7A3) ORDINANCE NO. 2005 — AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AMENDING THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.52.010 TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO -RELATED PRODUCTS IN ANY OUTDOOR CITY PARK, PLAYGROUND OR RECREATION FACILITY BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of the City of National City that Section 10.52.010 the National City Municipal Code is amended by adding Subsection HH thereto, to read as follows: 10.52.010 Prohibited activities. No person shall engage in any of the following acts within the premises of any city park, playground, golf course, or recreation facility: . HH. Except in any golf course, possess a lighted or buming tobacco product or tobacco -related product, including but not limited to cigars, cigarettes and pipes; use, including chewing of, tobacco or tobacco -related products; dispose of any lighted or unlighted tobacco or tobacco -related product in any place other than a designated waste disposal container. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of February, 2005. Nick Inzunza, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT May 17, 2005 ..EETING DATE 25 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE Resolution approving a waiver requested by Pacific Scene Homes, the builder of the housing development south of Paradise Valley Road and east of Plaza Boulevard, requiring the undergrounding of the electrical utility services serving the Wellington Estates property located south and west of the development. PREPARED BY Stephen Kirkpatrick DEPARTMENT Engineering 336-4583 EXPLANATION See Attached Explanation. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below Resolution No. May 5, 2005 Letter from Pacific Scene A-200 (9/80) RE: Resolution approving a waiver requested by Pacific Scene Homes, the builder of the housing development south of Paradise Valley Road and east of Plaza Boulevard, requiring the undergrounding of the electrical utility services serving the Wellington Estates property located south and west of the development. Pacific Scene submitted the attached letter requesting a waiver of the requirement to underground all overhead electrical utility lines within the boundaries of their subdivision. More specifically they are requesting that they not be required to underground the electrical service line that runs across the westernmost property in the subdivision, a property that was turned over to the owners of the Wellington Estate after the filing of the subdivision map and therefore not a part of the housing development. Pacific Scene HAS undergrounded all the electrical services within their housing development. This is the only electrical service that has not been undergrounded. At the time the condition was imposed, it was thought that since the line only services this property, it could be placed underground in an easement from above. This would allow the line leading up the hill, across a property created by the subdivision map process, to be removed. However, the owners of the property that the easement would cross have refused an easement. This then requires the line be placed underground. SDG&E has since indicated that this is a very difficult line to underground. So much so that they recommend against doing it. The owners of the Wellington property that are serviced by this line do not want the line placed underground. Based upon all the above conditions it is recommended that the electrical utility lines remain in place and Pacific Scene be granted the requested waiver. AI May 5, 2005 Stephen Kirkpatrick Director of Engineering City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-4301 Subject: Dear Stephen, PACIFIC SCENE H O M E S Resolution No. 2001-188 Resolution No. 2001-187 0h :ZI d b- AVii MI This is a request to be added to the City Council Public Hearing Agenda for May 17, 2005. The reason for this request is to waive the Condition of Approval #21 of Resolution No. 2001-188, dated December 4, 2001 and the Condition of Approval #19 of Resolution No. 2001-187, dated December 4, 2001 which states, "All utility distribution facilities within the boundaries of the subdivision, and within the half street abutting the new subdivision, shall be placed underground" and keep one pole on lot 39 to energize the Wellington Estate. As we, Pacific Scene Homes, are currently building this subdivision south of Paradise Valley Road and East of Plaza Boulevard, we have discovered the approved plans of the original builder did not take into consideration the ability to underground the Wellington Estates located south of the site. We hired a private utility design contractor to design the gas and electric facilities for the new houses as well as developing a means of eliminating the existing overhead line that passes through the subdivision. The original proposed plan to eliminate the overhead line called for it to be relocated to a parcel within the subdivision boundary that was not to be developed, lot 39. Condition of Approval #37 of Resolution No. 2001-188, dated December 4, 2001 and the Condition of Approval #35 of Resolution No. 2001-187, dated December 4, 2001 which states "Ownership of natural slope areas identified as open space lots 39 and 40 on the tentative map (Exhibit A-2nd Revision dated 11/6/2001, case file nos. SP-2000-1 and S-2000-3) shall be transferred to the owner of the Wellington Estate, who shall be responsible for all necessary maintenance, including landscaping maintenance as needed. Subject to terms and conditions as shall be agreed upon by the grantor and grantee, an escrow account shall be opened into which a deed shall be deposited transferring ownership of this property upon recordation of the final map. A lot line adjustment shall be processed as a condition of the escrow to ensure that the deeded area will become a party of the Wellington Estate property. Title shall pass upon recordation of the final map." The City, in turn, was not 2505 Congress Street / San Diego, California 92110 / telephone 619-299-5112 / fax 619-299-1876 Ell uI.0 r. PACIFIC SCENE HOMES satisfied that there was no other possible alternative and an exhaustive pursuit of various options ensued. One possibility was to extend underground electric up the old driveway to a point where it could be tied back in to the existing overhead line. Due to the terrain, the configuration of the subdivision boundary and the equipment requirements of SDG&E for this type of installation ruled it not possible and still remain completely outside the subdivision boundary. In addition, the hillside comprised of sandstone has already shown signs of slippage due to this year's rains and SDG&E's reluctance to own and operate an electric system in such a location with access being an issue also makes it not a possible solution. Another option was to bring in new electric service to the estate from the other side, through an existing residential neighborhood. This would require the extension of a new electrical line to be extended through the yard of one of the existing residents on Ethel Place, a Dr. Savage. Due to unforeseeable constraints for SDG&E, this also proved not possible. From SDGR&F's perspective, there is only one solution. The overhead line can be allowed to remain within the subdivision boundary by virtue of a waiver from the City of National City. Pacific Scene Homes would greatly appreciate the City's consideration in this matter, as would Mr. Moncrief. Everything is currently at a standstill. Sincerel Susie Andreotti Project Manager (619) 277-1352 CC: Peter Moncrief (Wellington Estate) Tony Ambrose (Burkett & Wong, Civil Engineer) Pat Gorgas (Butsko, Utitlity Consultant) Cary A. Likes (SDG&E) Members of National City City Council Andrew Hoskinson (City of National City Planning Department) MEETING DATE May 17. 2005 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 26 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE SCHEDULE WORKSHOP TO CONSIDER AN ETHICS CODE AND CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTION LIMITS PREPARED BY EXPLANATION George H. Eiser, Ill it$ DEPARTMENT City Attorney EXT. 4221 An Ethics Code and Campaign Contribution Limits Workshop was held in February of this year. It is requested that the City Council: 1. Schedule a workshop for further consideration of these topics. 2. Provide direction as to specific areas the Council desires to be discussed at the workshop. 1 Environmental Review _X N/A Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION 1. Schedule Workshop 2. Provide direction as to specific areas desired to be discussed at the Workshop BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) N/A Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) ITEM # 27 05/17/05 Authorization to initiate Manager's recommendations for Port of San Diego consideration of infrastructure needs, property utilization and consultant hiring (City Manager) PORT OF SAN DIEGO IMPACTS ON NATIONAL CITY The Port of San Diego's stated mission is to balance regional economic benefits, environmental stewardship, recreational opportunities and public safety while protecting Tidelands Trust resources on behalf of the citizens of California. One of six strategic goals states the Port will increase responsiveness to community needs. With these organizational values as a framework — Port operations in National City have been reviewed. The following information will present opportunities to collaborate with the Port to benefit residents and business as well as to highlight National City's critical importance to the Port District and San Diego region. Analysis and recommendations in the following areas will be covered: • Quality of life impacts resulting from Port land use and current activities • Investment and return to National City vis-a-vis other Port cities • The Port's current development plan and impacts on National City • Recommendations for the City Council to consider in future work with the Port Quality of Life The impacts of the Port's historical, current and future operations on National City residents and government cannot be understated. While the Port has created world - class destinations in San Diego and Coronado, provided wonderful environmental and recreational opportunities in Chula Vista and Imperial Beach, the fabled San Diego lifestyle is missing in National City. National City residents and visitors have the least amount of access to the San Diego Bay of any city within the Port. Although National City has three miles of bay front — it is essentially closed as a result of the intensive government related industrial uses in National City. This deprives residents from the same opportunities that citizens in Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, and San Diego have to enjoy unobstructed views and recreational access to parks and beaches. Given that National City has outstanding scenic view potential -- including the entire span of the Coronado Bridge and San Diego skyline --this is a lost opportunity of major magnitude. Regarding parks and beaches - the Port operates 7 parks in San Diego, 3 in Chula Vista, 3 in Coronado, 2 in Imperial Beach and 1 in National City. National City does not have a beach while contributing to the Port's wherewithal to maintain beaches in other cities. Heavy industrial development also impacts National City's image in direct contrast to the other communities. There is a minimal mix of recreation that is not responsive to the needs of the community. Land uses in National City create jobs and major revenue for the Port, however, they also create service demands and negative quality of life impacts. Heavy truck traffic, street deterioration, air quality, parking, code enforcement and compatibility issues with adjacent neighborhoods are a direct result. The lack of maintenance of railroad facilities and disproportionate level of heavy industrial development creates potential conflict with the Sycuan Hotel development, adjacent housing and ultimately development of the Marina area. Prepared by City Manager Chris Zapata Regarding other quality of life impacts, the Port has a contractual agreement to pay for limited public safety services and provides the maintenance of Pepper Park. The Port also invests annually in a summer music series. These payments are not unique, as there are public safety and identical music commitments for music entertainment to the four other cities. Regarding water and air quality, maritime activities in National City's terminal should be reviewed to determine environmental impacts in adjacent neighborhoods. Fishing for food is common from the Pepper Park pier and should be reviewed as well to determine safety before consumption. Investment and Return Properties in San Diego, National City and Chula Vista provide the essential dollars which enable the Port to move forward after the split and creation of the Airport Authority. National City also furnishes environmental mitigation benefits to the Port. Based on the amount of activity, jobs and revenue to the Port from National City, the community is a "donor" to the quality of life in the San Diego region. Although the Port has the legal authority to levy property taxes, it does not. Revenue is primarily generated through leases. These lease agreements provide most of the Port's approximately $120,000,000 in annual revenue. The properties also generate sales tax for cities that have hotels — National City has none on Port property. San Diego is fortunate to derive significant additional Transient Occupancy Taxes from major hotels on Port property. The disparity between communities becomes obvious when discussing hotels and beachfront. Hotel developments in San Diego generate significant revenue for the Port and the City of San Diego. Beaches without hotels generate operational expense to the Port such as maintenance and sand replenishment costs in Imperial Beach and Coronado. The Port states that it has invested $1,500,000,000 in member cities. Since 1963 the Port has provided the following public improvements in National City: Pepper Park, Rail Car Project, Aquatics Facility 1st phase, and National City Marina. In Chula Vista, Coronado and San Diego a multitude of diverse Port supported public improvements and developments have been made or are planned: major hotels, convention center, restaurants, golf, sailing, cruise ship docking, swimming, parking structures, housing, city facilities and open space. These projects will significantly enhance the quality of life in each of these communities and require millions of dollars be committed by the Port. National City, with the lowest per capita income in the County, has the Least amount of return for its bay front and absorbs proportionately the most ongoing service demands. Coronado has beaches, Imperial Beach has beaches, San Diego has beaches, Chula Vista will have beachfront and National City has jobs. While these businesses benefit the entire region, service demands are more intense and born primarily by National City taxpayers. Current property uses- with the exception of Dixieline - return comparatively little revenue to National City especially when compared to retail or hotel operations. There 2. Commission an Economic Impact Study that analyzes per acre return to Port member cities, number and types of jobs in National City, employment and positions of National City residents, historical investment by Port in National City, planned capital projects, property and sales tax from Port business, inventory of Port leases, fiscal capacity of the Port, spending and revenue comparison post creation of Airport Authority, current revenue sharing agreements with other Port Cities and government entities, and City/CDC financial investment in Port related projects such as the Marina and Aquatics Center. 3. Direct staff to conduct an Assessment of Port impacts on city services such as street maintenance, parking enforcement, sewer line conditions, code enforcement, fire safety and police services. 4. Request the Port fund a National City Land Use Plan that considers existing Port development plans and ways to accelerate them, provides for creative re -use of underdeveloped properties, explores innovative ways to utilize space creating more recreation and business opportunities. 5. Retain a Consultant or Firm to assist in discussions with the Port and development of these studies. Summary The desired outcomes of these steps would be: 1) A more informed City Council and Port of San Diego on opportunities and challenges. 2) A fresh view of National City opportunities on the San Diego Bay for residents and businesses via job creation, recreation and re -use of underdeveloped properties. 3) Equitable distribution of Port resources -- operations funding and capital projects. 4) Acceleration of Marina projects and the South Bay Aquatics Center. 5) Stronger City and Port relationship and closer ties to the Navy and Port Tenant's Association. 6) Financial participation by the Port in quality of life improvements such as expanded park space and recreation, mitigation of negative environmental practices and infrastructure replacement. currently exists on Port property 14 hotels totaling 6,521 rooms, 56 restaurants, 20 marinas and 5 yacht clubs — none of these in National City. While there is certainly a job benefit for the region, many of the employees working on Port related business do not live in National City and create service demands related to traffic, congestion and air quality. Current projects provide $115,000,000 in tax revenue to local cities according to a recent Port study. Only one Port property is on the list of 25 highest sales tax revenue generators in National City. Current Projects Port development planning places a great deal of emphasis on maritime and tourism uses. Planned improvements on Chula Vista's 125 acres include building 800 hotel rooms, retail, housing, parks and burying utility lines. This proposed $1.74 billion dollar development with $375 million of the cost to be provided by the Port and City of Chula Vista is exciting. Coronado's linear park and community center are current projects funded by the Port. San Diego continues to have the most diversified mix of recreation, tourism and maritime due to sheer size. Other than the Marina project, National City has been substantially built out today with minimal diversification and little recreation. These intensive land uses have significantly impacted streets, recreational opportunities, image and livability in a negative manner. The Port has a five-year planning process for allocation of major funds. National City does not have a major project or study in this horizon. It is important to note that revenue derived from National City properties continues to contribute significant dollars that allow funding of projects in the other four cities as well as operations funding in Coronado and Imperial Beach. Coronado recently received a $1.1 million dollar increase from the Port for on -going maintenance of Glorietta Park. Planned capital improvements in San Diego and Chula Vista will have significant impacts on future allocation of Port funds. The current operating and capital improvement allocation bodes well for all Port cities except National City. Capital funds and ongoing maintenance funds will continue to be distributed to all cities beyond National City as they have been historically. National City will continue to be a donor community as its three miles of bay front have been developed with minimal recreation and public access, no hotels and under-utilized development on prime property. Recommendations for City Council consideration To improve livability for residents, promote higher and better use of valuable property, and ensure that a fair return is provided to National City by the Port — operationally and with capital projects - the following recommendations are offered: 1. Begin discussions with Port Staff through the Port Commissioner, key stakeholders such as large employers and revenue generators in National City's Port area, Port Tenant's Association, Labor, Port cities, environmental interests, neighborhood groups and regional partners with respect to opportunities and challenges. ITEM # 28 05/17/05 National City Transit Report - John Webster NATIONAL •CITY •TRANSIT MONTHLY REPORT MAY-2005 Tech— n- olo�y 1. Completion for the joint NC -MIS Department -NCT project for community messaging via electronic kiosk is anticipated within the next few months. 2. A joint NCT-NCPD Security camera project is being evaluated for placement of Real Time video cameras along a NCT. bus route possibly within a few months. We have met and discussed this project with various vendors in order to try and estimate the potential cost and various equipment needed if approved. NCT-CIP funding is available for a small demonstration project and we are currently looking at ways to receive public input regarding this project. Ride---- rs APR-04 MAR 05 APR-05 Ridership : 142,881 46,508 142,736 Passengers per mi. 1 3.48 3.53 53 3.5959 Passengers per hr. 40.52 40.70 3 Revenue miles: 41,103 39,813,8 Revenue Hours: 3,599993 ,45 3,526 3,445 Road Calls 09 01 Accidents 02 02 00 Lift deployments 5 N/A 616 557 Our on -time performance 82.40% 92.5 86.9% Maintenance: NCT Revenue vehicles used 12,074 gallons of low sulfur diesel fuel. Our average cost per gallon was $1.887 per gallon in April, and $1.706 YTD, which is still well above the FY05 assumption of $1.10 per gallon. MTS will utilize their fuel emergency fund to reimburse NCT budget for any shortfall if necessary. NCT maintenance personnel performed 16 Preventative Maintenance Inspections (PMI's) and made 35 minor repairs consisting of batteries, volt gauges, flat tires, fog lights and minor fuel leaks. We also made 8 major repairs consisting of Rear wheel seals, transmission seals, radiator, and fire alarm warning system repairs to our fleet vehicles in April. Route Development & Marketing Our NCT trailer was used to distribute NC and MTS system and schedule information at the 8th Street Trolley Station. We will be utilizing these trailers at as many NC special events as possible and these trailers are available at no charge to NC Departments and organizations. 522 West 8th St. • National City, California 91950-1004 • (619) 474-7505 Fax (619) 474-2058 McDonald Transit Associates, Inc., Contract Operator for NCT 1 Bus Stop Amenities: NCT installed and additional five (4) benches at NC bus stops. Two at 8th & D Street (concrete style), one at W 3rd NC Blvd (wood backed style), and one at Euclid & Ridgeway (wood backed style). We will continue to evaluate bus stops for additional benches and shelters. NCT is also evaluating providing two (2) concrete style benches and Art materials for a pilot project by local NC school art students for placement at selected NCT bus stops and parks. NCT is also exploring the possibility of providing art materials and a wall for an outside mural facing the Blue Line trolley route, which runs West of the NCT facility. These two projects are scheduled to be discussed at the May 13th Art Committee meeting by Leslie Deese. Administration & Community Collaboration NCT participates and is a member of many standing Transportation Committees at MTDB and SANDAG such as the Regional Transit Management Committee (RTMC), Transit Services and Facilities Committee (TSFC), Operators Advisory Committee (OAC), Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), Uniform Fare Working Group, Security Critical Incident Committee (SCIC), Transit Research Working Group, Accessible Services Advisory Committee (ASAC) and South County EDC Transportation Committee. NCT is a member of the California Transit Association (C.T.A) and the American Public Transit Association (A.P.T.A.) and is an active advocate for Regional and National Transit related issues. NCT staff directly participates on the NC Chamber of Commerce Community Promotions, Military Affairs, Business/Education and Public Safety Committees and I have been elected Chamber President until February 2006. NCT is currently in the planning stages to provide free transportation for NC residents to attend the MicroEnterprise Family Child Care program being developed at the new SW College Higher Education Center in National City. This would allow thirty- (30) NC residents to attend five semesters over a three- year period if the grant is awarded. The estimated value of this transportation is approximately $26,000. Cynthia Nagura, Director of the SW Family Resource Center is our project contact and in charge of the Federal Grant application process. NCT is also committed to working with the National City Community and residents through direct participation in Community projects and organizations as volunteers or sponsors. NCT is also willing to evaluate, and assist whenever possible to help meet the transportation needs of NC departments and organizations on a case -by -case basis for special orannual events. Submitted: May 5, 2005 John P. Webster Sr. Vice President -General Manager National City Transit 2 NATIONAL • CITY • TRANSIT May 5, 2005 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of University Partnerships 451 7th Street SW, Room 8106 Washington, DC 20410 To Whom It :M:ay Concern: National City Transit would be honored to support the Microenterprise Family Child Care Program which will be based at the Southwestern College Higher Education Center in National City. We look forward to this op:portunity to work in collaboration with the College to assist the low to moderate income residents who will greatly benefit from this unique program. Our contribution will consist of providing transit passes fox all of the participants of this program, for the duration of their course. This will allow participants to ride the busses in National Ciry at no cost, and therefore overcome any transportation barriers that might exist for them to be able to go to and from their homes to the campus. The breakdown of the value of this contribution is as follows: $58/monthly pass x 3 months (to corer course duration per semester) = $174 per participant $174 x 30 participants = $5,220 per semester $5,220 x 5 semesters = $26,100 The total value of our contribution towards this project is $26,100. The transit passes will be available upon notification that the grant has been awarded and for the 3 year duration of the grant from November 1, 2005 — October 31, 2008. Sincerely, ohn Webster, Sr.. General Manager 522 West 8th St. • National City, California 91950-1004 • (619) 474-7505 Fax (619) 474-2058 McDonald Transit Associates, Inc., Contract Operator for NCT National City Transit MICHAEL HERNANDEZ IS CELEBRATING HIS 9TH t, YEAR AT NCT AS OF MAY 1ST! DON'T FORGET - NATIONAL CITY TRANSIT WILL RE PARTICIPATING IN TM! YEARS INTERNATIONAL PARADE & FAIR ON SATURDAY, MAY 211T AT 10 AM. TNI! If A WONDERFUL OPPORTUNITY TO SUPPORT NATIONAL CITY AND SNARE TILE EXCITING EXPERIENCE OF BEING IN A PARADE WITH ANY LITTLE ONE! IN YOUR LIFE Part of The Making of An You are invited to participate in the transformatin i o National City's old library into National City's new Center! The building is situated in Kimball Park,`across from the, new library under construction. The goal is to endure that' the new Art~Carter reflects the kinds of uses the community; wants. The fuses army include dance, music' visual art,,erafts, industrial: arts and multimedia arts. We want your input! Saturday, May 14th 2005 at 9:30 a.m. to noon May 7th World Asthma Day. Kimball Park 10 am-2 pm. Free Asthma Screening, fun, food, and games. May 14th Art Center Workshop. Kimball Senior Center, 1221 D Ave, National City. RSVP (619) 336-4290 May 21 st International Parade & Fair. Parade begins at 10 am on 28th & Highland. Fair at Kimball Park beginning at 12 noon. Floppy Birthday! Raquel Pnreu.er Ray 5ti1 I ITioria Fogter Ray 12t11 Ben, filworte i fllay IStit Guillerrgo I ternortdez Ray 31re The City of National City has embraced five core values which we feel will help guide us to better serve you, the citizens. These core values "The Five C's" demonstrate our commitment to this city, and the citizens who live here. By using the Five C's as a guide, we will succeed both as individuals and as a public organization. VISION: To be an admired organization and communi*- ♦ Commitment We strive for excellence as we serve the public and each other with integrity, compassion, responsiveness and professionalism. ♦ Courtesy We treat everyone with dignity and respect. ♦ Communication We communicate openly, honestly, and with clear, consistent messages. ♦ Collaboration We work to achieve common goals and value our differences ♦ Challenge We embrace change and challenge ourselves to be the best. We welcome any suggestions for future publications. Please email your questions, comments, or suggestions to: AWebster@ci.national-city.ca.us Or, place your suggestion in the box located in the drivers lobby. Volume 1 Issue #5 May 2005 Dates To Remember: 5th Cinco de Mayo Holocaust Remembrance 7th World Asthma Day 8th Mother's Day 10th Mother's Day (Mexico) 21st International Parade & Fair; Armed Forces Day 30th Memorial Day Volunteers Needed! National City Transit is currently looking for volunteers to staff our trailers. As incentive, volunteers will be eligible for a Transit Identification Card which grants them free access on all MTS bus routes and the trolley. If you, or anyone you know would like to help, please contact the front office for more information. FAST FACT: VIOLENT CRIME IS DOWN 23% IN NATIONAL CITY *A Reminder* Please check the bulletin in the driver's lounge to see if you are scheduled for a uniform fit - Volume 1 Issue #5 pY+3dryC 76% of Americans support public funds for the expansion and improvement of public transportation A Big Welcome. National City Transit's member: 1 Paredes Manuel was us operator on April 17th e Aboard! May 2005 We have finally finished outfitting our two trailers to be used to distribute our system information and can begin putting them at various locations on a somewhat steady basis. We have already tried at a few events but the main holdback is, as always, a lack of money in our budget to hire a permanent staff member. As such, we are still trying to get "volunteers" to man these trailers and can be very flexible when it comes to scheduling. If you have any friends or family that you think would be good candidates to represent NCT to distribute our information please let us know. If they can work about 20 hours per week we can offer a monthly pass for unlimited rides on the entire MTS system. NCT has also adopted the new National City Code of Conduct referred to as the FIVE C's. They are: COMMITMENT, COURTESY, COMMUNICATION, COLLABORATION, and CHALLENGE. We talk more about these 5 C's on the following page. When we think about the way we do our various jobs, these 5 C's should govern the way we act not only with the public, but with each other as well. As always, please let us know if you have any suggestions or comments that will make us a better organization. This is YOUR house, and we need YOUR help to make it run smoothly. THANK YOU FOR YOUR GREAT WORK AND DEDICATION TO NATIONAL CITY AND OUR LOYAL PASSENGERS. JW A Non -Partisan Issue During the past election, 31 pro transit propositions were on the ballot. Transit came out victorious in 24 of them. Whereas transit was once con- sidered a great society pro- gram for the poor and for those who had no other means of getting around, voters are willing to raise their own taxes to pay for systems that work. Cities small, medium, and large voted for transit and the propositions were supported by republicans and democrats, conservatives as well as liber- als. Suffice to say, transit plan- ners don't have to hope for a strong turnout of either party. Transit appears to be an issue that has appeal across the board. (Cited from Passenger Transport) FLYERS PLACED ON NCT BUSES APRIL-05 City of National City Office of the Public Works/Engineering Director 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950-4397 (619) 336-4580, Fax (619) 336-4397 www.ci.national-city.ca.us Everything that flows down into a storm drain goes untreated directly into our creeks, lagoons, and San Diego Bay. When it rains or when water flows out of yards, it flows directly into storm drains. Many people think that everything that flows into a storm drain gets treated at the Point Loma Sewage Treatment Plant, just like wastewater in the sewer system, but these two systems are not connected. The sources of pollution that must be controlled and eliminated result from urbanization and the choices that are made every day by residents, businesses and industry alike. For example, detergents, oil, grease, and other pollutants have been shown to be toxic to wildlife in local streams and San Diego Bay. Recycling of oil, antifreeze, glass, plastic, and other materials can prevent their improper disposal into the stormwater drainage system. Proper landscaping practices include minimization of the use of herbicides, pesticides and fertilizers together with conservation of water to minimize runoff of pollutants from landscaped areas, lawns, golf courses, etc. The City of National City's Stormwater Management & Discharge Control of the National City Municipal Code Chapter 14.22, prohibits non-stormwater discharges, such as car washwater, pesticides, fertilizers, pet waste, litter, oil, and other automobile fluids, to run into the City's storm drain system. This ordinance is based on regulations set forth by the State Regional Water Quality Control Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in connection with the State and Federal Clean Water Acts. t Your help is needed, and by doing your part, by changing your washwater and trash disposal practices, you will help reduce the pollution problems in the community where you and your family Jive, work and play. Please call Storm Drain Hotline at (619) 336-4389 if you have any questions regarding this matter and to report any illegal discharges and /or dumping. City of National City Office of the Public Works/Engineering Director 1243 National City Blvd. National City, CA 91950-4397 619) 336-4580, Fax (619) 336-4397 www.ci.national-city.ca.us Todo lo que desemboca en las aicantarillas no esta tratado y va a parar directamente a nuestras lagunas, esteros y Bahia de San Diego. Cuando Ilueve o cuando escurre agua de algun patio, desemboca directamente a las alcantarrillas. Mucha gente piensa que todo lo que desemboja en una alcantariila es tratado en la planta de Tratamiento de Agua Negras en Point Loma, como las aguas negras del sistema de drenaje, pero estos dos sistemas no estan conectados. Las causas de contaminacion que tienen que ser controladas y eliminadas resultan de la urbanizacion y las elecciones que hacen todos los dias los residentes, negocios y la industria. Por ejemplo, detergentes, aceite, grasa, ya otros contaminantes se ha visto que son toxicos para la vida silvestre en nuestros arroyos locales y Bahia de San Diego. Reciclando el aceite, antifreeze, vidrio, plastico y otros productos que sean desechados de un modo inadecuado Ilegen a parar al sistema de alcantarillado de la ciudad. Los metodos de mantener el jardin, como usar menos los herbicidas, pesticidas y fertilisantes.Tambien como conservar el agua para que esa agua con contaminantes de los jardines, pastos, canchas de golf, etc. El Codigo Municipal No. 14.22 de las aguas pluviales de la Ciudad de National City, prohibe aguas que no sean pluviales como las aguai negras, pesticidas, fertllisantes, basura, aceite y otros Iiquidos de carros que sean depositadas en el sistema de alcantarillado de la ciudad. Esta regla esta basada en las regulaciones puesta por "State Regional Water Quality Control Board" y "U.S. Environmental Protection Agency" en conneccion con "State and Federal Clean Water Acts." Su ayuda es necesaria, y haciendo su parte como cambiar el modo de tirar su basura, usted ayudara a reducir la contaminacion en la comunidad donde usted y su familia ; ^ viven, trabajan yjuegan. Por favor llama a la linea de "Storm Drain Hotline" al (619) 336-4389, si tiene alguna pregunta o si quiere reportar algun desague !legal. CALIFORNIA COUNCIL FOR TFUE 1FIUM,ANITIES AND TFUE NATIONAL CITY 11)1JI3LIC 1_II31V,ALY PRESENT CALIFORNIA STORIES UNCO[ERED THE CALIFORNIA COUNCIL FOR THE NUMAIMES WRITERS IN CONVERSATION" WITI1 Ruben Martinez Tuesday, April 2C, 2005 @ 7:00hM AUK COMMUNITY CENTER 140 E. 12TI-1 Street National City, CA, 91950 Ruben Martinez is the author of four maior works, most recently the nonfiction collection, The NV American. A writer, editor and musician, he writes and is a commentator for CNN, Frontline, Nightline and Ail Things Considered. Ruben Martinez will be interviewed by Jim Quay, Executive Director of the California Council for the Humanities. They will tack about Ruben's life, his writing and California. A reception and bcvk signing will follow. For more information call: Anne Campbell C19-33C-4350 • Westfield Shoppingtown/Plaza Bonita Thursday, April 21 & Friday, April 22 7:30 pm Saturday, April 23 & Sunday, April 24 1:30 pm 4:30 pm 7:30 pm ***ADVANCE TICKET PRICES*** Ringside Box Seats $13 Premium Reserved Seats $10 General Admission 'Bleacher Seats $7 Tickets can be purchased at: National City Chamber of Commerce 901 National City Blvd. National City 619-477-9339 0r by calling 1-888-663-7464 www.circuschimera.com • • National City Transit Free Bus Pass! Pase Gratis de autobiis National City Transit is looking for volunteers to distribute system information. • Will train. • Minimum of 20 hours a week • Bilingual a plus • Knowledge of National City area & bus system helpful. Volunteers will be eligible for Transit System identification card which provides free unlimited rides on all MTS Buses, Trolleys, and NCTD Service. Contact National City Transit at 619-474-7505 for more information Or Pick up an application at 522 W 8th St, National City National City Transit esta buscando a voluntarios para distribuir la infonnacion del sistema de transportacion • Entrenaremos • Minimo 20 horas a la semana • Biling ie una ventaja. • Conocimiento del area de National City y del sistema provechosos. Los Voluntarios seran elegibles para la tarjeta de identificacion del sistema de transito. Que proporciona paseos ilimitados gratis en todos los autobuses de MTS, CarretilIas, y servicio del NCTD. Para mas informacion flame a National City Transit 6/9-474-7505 0 tome una aplicacidn en 522 W. 8th St, National City "Una sonrisa sane esti siempre en mods" Taller A Manteniendo Una Sonrisa Saludable Miercoles, 13 de abril.2005 10:00 am - 11:30 am Aprende:: Como .Prevenir Caries • La Manera Correcta de Cepillar Sus Dientes • La Importanda de Selladores Dentales y Fluoruros para sus hijos Taller B Nutricion y Comprendiendo to que Comes Miercoles, 27 de abril, 2005. 10:00 am - 11:30 am Aprende: • Como una Boca Saludable es el camino hacia un Cuerpo Saludable • Como Escoger las Mejores Comidas y Refrigerios para to familia • Como leer la Etiqueta de Comida Family Resource Center Southwestern College Higher Education Center.. 880 National City Blvd. (619) 216-6672 SWC AEC Entrance > Parking Entrance * Ofrecidos en Ingles y Espanol * GRATIS un regalo dental pars cada participante * Participantes que asisten AMBOS talleres A y B recibiran Un Certificado de Terminacion de SWC Workshop A Keeping a Healthy Smile! Wed, April 13, 2005 10:00 am - 11:30 am Learn: • How to Prevent Cavities • The Right Way to Brush Your Teeth • The Importance of Dental Sealants Et Fluoride for your Children Workshop B Nutrition Et Understanding What You Eat Wed, April 27, 2005 10:00 am - 11:30 am Learn: • How a Healthy Mouth leads to a Healthy Body • How to Pick the Best Foods for your Family • How to Read a Food Label ental Hygiene Workshops Family Resource Center Southwestern College Higher Education Center 880 National City Blvd. (619) 216-6672 w. sth St. Roosevelt Ave. cci SWC t: EEC 1 L.V.AVEG\VISMA4 Plaza Bivd. z 4 SWC HEC Entrance > Parking Entrance * Offered in English & Spanish * FREE dental gift for each participant! * Participants who attend BOTH workshop A and B will receive a SWC CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION! &S' C SWINWEST61111 Career Development Workshops Talleres de Desarrollo de Carr Southwestern College Higher Education Center etas Centro de Recursos de la Familia 880 National City Blvd. (619) 216-6672 Workshop (Spanish Only) *Time Management Tuesday, April 19th 6:00 pm — 9:00 pm 1. Learn how to Develop Basic Career Management Skills 2. Learn how to Set priorities; Time Management, Effective Decision Making, & Increasing Productivity Taller (Espanol) *Eficiencia de Tiempo Martes, Abril 19th 6:OOpm-9:OOpm 3. Aprende el Desarrollo de Habilidades para Carreras Basicas de Admnistracion 4. Aprende Como Hacer Prioridades, Eficiencia de Tiempo, Como Hacer Decisions mas Efectivas y Incrementar Productividad FREE CHILD CARE! * MUST REGISTER BY PHONE AT (61.9) 216-6672 ;GRATIS Cuidado de Niliosl * SE TIENE QUEINSCRIBIR POR TELEFONO AL (619) 216-6672 LLENAR UNA APLICACION Parking Permits Required Permisos de Estacionamiento Re queriflo Taller de: COMO COMPRAR UNA CASA Y CONSEJOS DE CREDITO Viernes, 29 de abril, 2005 9:00 am - 12:00 pm Taller en Espanol Family Resource Center Southwestern College Higher Education Center 880 National City Blvd. (619) 216-6672 Aprende: • Pasos Esenciales para la compra de una Casa • Como Administrar su Dinero • Entender su reporte de Credito • Administracion Financiera • Programas de Asistencia • Asesoramiento de Credito !GRATIS Cuidado de !linos! Cupo Limitado w. a'" st. 1 swc y HEc r U Plane Blvd swc me Enhance > Parking Enhance DEBE 1NSCRIBIltSE POR TELEFONO AL (619) 216-6672 HELIUM TANK AND NCT NEW MARgETING SALOONS kONJL CITY TPA ON THE Mu Wt •FTN sr"fl.iI TRAILER HEIGHT National City Tr 1Or On The Move sit Rediscover National City s-44+, Ai