Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007 07-03 CC CDC AGENDA PKT
Agenda Of A Regular Meeting - National City City Council / Community Development Commission of the City of National City Council Chambers Civic Center 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California Regular Meeting - Tuesday — July 3, 2007 — 6:00 P.M. Open 'i'o The Public Please complete a request to speak form prior to the commencement of the meeting and submit it to the City Clerk. It is the intention of your City Council and Community Development Commission (CDC) to be receptive 10 your concerns in this conununity. Your participation in local government will assure a responsible and efficient City of National City. We invite you to bring to the attention of the City Manager/Executive Director any matter that you desire the City Council or Community Development Commission Board to consider. We thank you for your presence and wish you to know that we appreciate your involvement. ROLL CALL Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by Mayor Ron Morrison Public Oral Communications (Three -Minute Time Limit) NOTF: Pursuant to state law, items requiring Council or Community Development Commission action must be brought back on a subsequent Council or Community Development Commission Agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. Upon request, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (619) 336-4228 to request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24-hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. ,Spanish audio interpretation is provided during Council and Community Development Commission Meetings Audio headphones are available in the lobby at the beginning of the meetings. Audio interpretation en espanol se proporciona durante sesiones del Consejo Municipal. Los auditfonos estan disponibles en el pasillo al principio de la junta. Council Requests That All Cell Phones And Pagers Be Turned Off During City Council Meetings OPIES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDAS AND MINUTES MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH OUR WEBSITE AT www.ci.national-city.ca.us CITY COUNCILJCOMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/3/07 - Page 2 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council/Community Development Commission of June 5, 2007. (City Clerk) 2. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of solar -powered red flashing beacons for safety and awareness (stop sign pole mounting assembly) on Wilson Avenue at 18th Street. (Community Services Department, TSC Item No. 2007-17) (Engineering) 3. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of red curb "no parking" along the northwest corner of the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane. (D. Yamane, TSC Item No. 2007-22) (Engineering) 4. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of a 3-minute passenger loading zone and handicap parking adjacent to Olivewood Elementary School on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street. (L. Vicario, Principal, TSC Item No. 2007-21) (Engineering) 5. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of 1-hour time restricted parking from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. along the west side of National City Boulevard between 8`h Street and Plaza Boulevard. (Local Business Owners, TSC Item No. 2007-19) (Engineering) CITY COUNCIL/COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/3/07 - Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 6. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting the work from Portillo Concrete, Inc. approving the Contract Final Balance Change Order List with the final amount at $139,536.75 and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion for the Miscellaneous Concrete Improvement Project at various locations, Specification No. 06-02. (Engineering) 7. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the transfer of workers' compensation claims administration to Tristar Risk Management, and authorizing the termination of the existing agreement to provide such services with Claims Management Services. (City Attorney) 8. WARRANT REGISTER # 46 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $2,500,658.86. 9. WARRANT REGISTER # 47 (Finance) Ratification of Demands in the amount of $176,055.74. NON CONSENT RESOLUTION 10. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project. (Community Development Commission) NEW BUSINESS 11. Temporary Use Permit — National City Car Show at 401 Mile of Cars Way on July 7, 2007 from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Building & Safety) 12. Temporary Use Permit — South Bay Aquatics 24 Hour Relay at National City Municipal Pool from August 3, 2007 to August 4, 2007 from 5:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Building & Safety) CITY COUNCIL/COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/3/07 - Page 4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 13. Ratifications of Expenditures of the Community Development Commission: Expenditures for the Period of 06/01/07 through 06/14/07 of $783,854.61. (Community Development Commission/Finance) 14. Resolution of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City approving a Subordination Agreement with Pacific View Estates, LLC for a 49-unit single family project located at 1125, 1251, and 1311 East Division Street in National City, Califomia and authorizing the Chairman to execute said Agreement. (Community Development Commission) NON CONSENT RESOLUTION 15. Resolution of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City approving the Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project. (Community Development Commission) NEW BUSINESS 16. HOME Investments Partnership Act (HOME) Program Income update and allocation process. (Community Development Commission) STAFF REPORTS MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT Next Regular City Council and Community Development Commission Meeting - Tuesday — July 10, 2007 - 6:00 p.m. — Council Chamber - National City. TAPE RECORDINGS OF CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETINGS ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ITEM #1 7/3/07 Approval of the Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council/Community Development Commission of June 5, 2007. (City Clerk) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 01EETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of solar - powered red flashing beacons for safety and awareness (Stop sign pole mounting assembly) on Wilson Avenue at 18th Street (Community Services Department, TSC Item No. 2007-17) PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT EXT. 4382 Stephen Manganletto Engineering EXPLANATION Please see attached. J Environmental Review X WA MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION R^ECOMMEDATION At their meeting on June 13, 2007 the Traffic Safety Committee approved the staff recommendation to instaN solar -powered red flashing beacons for safety and awareness (Stop sign pole mounting assembly) on Wilson Avenue at 18'" Street ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Explanation 2, Staff Report to the Traffic Safety Committee A-200 (Rev. 7/03) Explanation The Community Services Department, on behalf of the Old Town Neighborhood Council, requested that staff investigate the potential for All -Way Stop control at the intersection of 18th Street and Wilson Avenue. Staff gathered traffic volume and accident data to perform a warrant analysis for All -Way Stop control. Review of police accident records indicated that there was one reported accident at this location within the past year — a. vehicle on eastbound 18"' Street was rear ended while stopped at the intersection. According to City Council Policy, a total of 30 points out of 50 is required to justify installation of All -Way Stop control at an intersection. Warrants were not met since only 22 points were achieved. Staff also obtained daily speed data for 18th Street which indicates that the 85% percentile speed (speed at or below which 85% of all vehicles surveyed were traveling) was 35 mph for eastbound traffic and 27 mph for westbound traffic. The posted speed limit along 18th Street is 30 mph. Since All -Way Stop control warrants were not met, the Traffic Safety Committee directed staff to resurvey the site to assess striping improvements and other options for improving safety. Both engineering and public works staff resurveyed the site and agreed that additional striping to create turn pockets or channelization was not appropriate. Staff observed traffic at the site and noticed that many vehicles traveling northbound on Wilson Avenue did not come to a complete stop at 18th Street. Staff recommends installing solar - powered red flashing beacons for safety and awareness (Stop sign pole mounting assembly) on Wilson Avenue at 18`" Street. Based on this intersection's proximity to Kimball Elementary School, the beacons would be installed as part of the Safe Routes to School Program. In addition, new speed surveys for both 18th Street and Wilson Avenue have been included as part of the City -Wide Speed Survey project which started last month. This will enable the National City Police Department to continue to enforce posted speed limits using radar. TSC 2007-17 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 150 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO INSTALL STOP SIGN POLE MOUNTED SOLAR -POWERED RED FLASHING BEACONS ABOVE THE STOP SIGNS ON WILSON AVENUE AT 18TH STREET FOR SAFETY AND AWARENESS WHEREAS, the Old Town Neighborhood Council requested that staff investigate the potential for All -Way Stop control at the intersection of 18th Street and Wilson Avenue due to safety concerns; and WHEREAS, staff investigated the sight and found that All -Way Stop control requirements were not met. Subsequently, staff recommends the installation of Stop Sign Pole Mounted Solar -Powered Red Flashing Beacons above the stop signs on Wilson Avenue at 18th Street; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on June 13, 2007, the Traffic Safety Committee approved the installation Stop Sign Pole Mounted Solar -Powered Red Flashing Beacons above the stop signs on Wilson Avenue at 18th Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the City Engineer to install Stop Sign Pole Mounted Solar - Powered Red Flashing Beacons above the stop signs on Wilson Avenue at 18th Street. PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 2007. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attomey L= NATIONAL CITY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT FOR JUNE 13, 2007 ITEM TITLE: "OLD BUSINESS" REQUEST FOR ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF 18Th STREET AND WILSON AVENUE (BY: RESIDENTS OF OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL) PREPARED BY: Stephen Manganiello, Engineering Department DISCUSSION: Staff previously gathered speed, volume and accident data which was used to perform a warrant analysis for All -Way Stop control at the intersection of 18t Street and Wilson Avenue. Warrants were not met. The Traffic Safety Committee directed staff to resurvey the site to assess striping improvements and other options for improving safety. Both engineering and public works staff resurveyed the site and agreed that additional striping to create turn pockets or channelization was not appropriate. Staff observed traffic at the site and noticed that many vehicles traveling northbound on Wilson Avenue did not come to a complete stop at 18"' Street. To improve driver awareness of and compliance with the Stop signs on Wilson Avenue at 18"' Street, staff recommends mounting a red flashing beacon above each Stop sign. Based on this intersection's proximity to Kimball Elementary School, the beacons would he installed as part of the Safe Routes to School Program. Staff has authorized new speed surveys for both 18th Street and Wilson Avenue as part of a City-wide project, which will enable the National City Police Department to continue to enforce posted speed limits using radar. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends mounting a red flashing beacon above each Stop sign for the northbound and southbound approaches on Wilson Avenue at 18th Street to improve driver awareness of and compliance with the Stop signs. EXHIBITS: 1. TSC Item No. 2007-17, dated May 9, 2007 2007-17 (2) 1 NATIONAL CITY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT FOR MAY 9, 2007 r yc S.i._,w�71 ITEM TITLE: REQUEST FOR ALL -WAY STOP CONTROL AT THE INTERSECTION OF 18IH STREET AND WILSON AVENUE (BY: RESIDENTS OF OLD TOWN NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL PREPARED BY: Stephen Manganiello, Engineering Department DISCUSSION: National City Community Services explained that several Old Town Neighborhood Council residents have safety concerns regarding the intersection of 18m Street and Wilson Avenue. They mentioned that excessive speeds and poor sight distance have contributed to several accidents. They are also concerned because children from the nearby Kimball Elementary School cross at this intersection. Staff obtained traffic volume and accident data to conduct a formal All -Way Stop Warrant Analysis. According to City Council Policy, a total of 30 points out of 50 is required to justify installation of All -Way Stop control at an intersection. Warrants to be considered include: 1. Through street conditions, 2. Accident records, 3. Traffic and pedestrian volumes, 4. Unusual conditions such as proximity of schools, fire stations, vision obscurement, etc. Review of police accident records indicated that there was one reported accident at this location within the past year — a vehicle on eastbound 18m Street was rear ended while stopped at the intersection. Upon completion of the warrant analysis, staff determined that 22 points were achieved (out of a total of 50 points). Therefore, staff does not recommend installation of All -Way Stop control at this location. Staff also obtained daily speed data for 18m Street which indicates that the 85% percentile speed (speed at or below which 85% of all vehicles surveyed were traveling) was 35 mph for eastbound traffic and 27 mph for westbound traffic. The posted speed limit along 18m Street is 30 mph. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff does not recommend installing All -Way Stop control at the intersection of 18m Street and Wilson Avenue, since warrants established by the City Council are not met. Staff recommends re -surveying the intersection within the next 6 to 12 months. EXHIBITS: 1. Correspondence 2. Location Map 3. Photos 4. Warrant Analysis 5. Survey Data 2007-17 Page l of l Stephen Manganiello From: Erica Belandres Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 4:51 PM To: Stephen Manganiello Cc: Lauren Lauletta Subject: 18th/Wilson-Old Town Hello Steve, Residents at the Old Town Neighborhood Council meeting brought up a traffic concern regarding the intersection at 18th / Wilson Ave. This is currently a two- way stop and residents are requesting for the City to make this a 4-way stop with traffic lights. Vehicles use excessive speeds when driving eastbound on 18th under the 5 freeway and several accidents have been reported. Residents consider this to be a blind intersection and are concerned about their safety when driving. This is another area residents would like the City to focus on during the traffic study. We suggested that residents fill out a Traffic Safety Committee form but opted to go through Neighborhood Council. Thanks, Erica 6/7/2007 16th u) N tor . , /6/2 43.30 ;• 1632 MAP .f4() 720 1725 .5 1 — 41 /8/2 A118 1828 /838 /8 56 1840 !La 1900 /912 /9/4 /SW /928 /934 2004 a714 2016 X.124 2028 • 2032 2040 2050 17th /7// /70 / 72/ / 7J/ /60 7 1623 / 625 1• -4 ,NP 0 I /671 •• • /702 X /7/2 /7742. / TAS /728 / 729 tZ) .* Nt• 18th 1821 1827 /829 637 1 19th /925 / 931 / 945 11• /8/6 " /9.6 /924 /934 193 2 1936 se 20th zodffl i• - - 2015 2015 2037 20 39 1 (40 2006 ie I /7775 V 7 I /707 /723 /725 /727 I -1 f 724 i ! tr, ' 1 • 64 "". /903 tn ' 34 /915 /925 Lti D i! <IT 1 t STR -ET - S • 18th Street (east leg, looking west) 18`h Street (west leg, looking west) 18th Street (south leg, looking south) 18th Street (north leg, looking north) St /CA/ ;/Jag-, ,4ve • Page 4 of 5 POLICY FOR 4-WAY STOP CONTROL 1. PURPOSE A fully justified, properly installed four-way stop can effectively assign right- of-way, reduce vehicle delay and decrease accidents. Generally, a four-way stop is reserved for use at the intersection of two through highways, and only as an innterim traffic control measure prior to signaiization. 2. GENERAL The posting of an Intersection for four-way stop control should be based on factual data. harrants to be considered include: 1. Through street conditions. 2. Accident records. 3. Traffic and pedestrian volumes. 4. Unusual conditions such as proximity of schools, fire stations, vision obscurement, etc. Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total possible points is 50. The installation of four-way stop control is justified with a total of 30 points. 3. THROUGII STREET WARRANT j� One of the approaching streets to the intersection must be a through highway before the intersection can be considered for four-way stop control. A through highway shall extend at least one mile in both directions from the intersection under consideration and shall meet conditions set forth on Page 8, Section 2f of the Highway Capacity Manual, 1965. A. If only one of the intersecting streets is a through highway. 1-3 Pts. B. If both streets are through highways. 3-5 Pts. Maximum 5 points. 4. ACCIDENT %ARRANT 7D Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by four- way stop control during one full year prior to the ivestigsation. Maximum 14 points. 5. UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT Where unusual conditions exist at the intersection such as a school) fire station, playground, 6Ision o scurementi, etc., points are assigned on the bast of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be considered only If within 500 feet of the intersection. Maximum 10 points Page 5 Qf 5 . _ 6. VOLUME WARRANT A. Total entering vehicle volume must equal 2,000 vehicles for four highest hours in average day. B. Minimum side street vehicular and pedestrian volume must equal 600 vehicles during same four hour period. Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables: MINOR STREET PEDESTRIAN & ALL APPROACHES VEHICLE VOLUME (BOTH APPROACHES) Highest Four Hour Volume Points Highest Four Hour Volume Points 0 - 1400 0,� 600 - 800 78O t 1401 - 1700 14 36 CJ 801 - 1200 2 1701 - 2000 2 1201 - 1400 • 3 2001 - 2300 3 1401 - 1600 4 2301 - 2600 4 1601 - Over 5 1601 - 2900 5 2901 - 3200 6 3201 - 3500 7 3501 - 3800 8 3801 - 4100 7 4101 - 4400 6 4401 - 4700 5 4701 - 5000 4 5001 - 5300 3 5301 - 5600 2 5601 - 5900 1 Over - 5900 0 Maximum 13 Points 7 VOLUME SPLIT WARRANT: Four -way stops operate best where the minor approach volume and the major approach volume are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in accordance with the folowing table: 24-Hour Minor St. Volumes 24-Hour Major St. Volumes Points 2. /„ 616 Maximum 8 Points 95+ 35 - 94 75 - 84 65 - 74 55 - 64 45 - 54 35 - 44 25 - 34 0-24 8 7 6 4 3 2 1 0 Weather: Clear & Dry Counted By: S. Mangiafico Board #: D1-1307 Loc: W 18th Street & Wilson Ave 1 Start Time 07:00 07:15 07:30 07:45 Total 08:00 08:15 08:30 08:45 Total Grand Total Apprch % Total % Wilson Ave Southbound Lett 1 Thru ; Right Peds ' 1 1 2 4 8 3 2 2 1 8 1 3 8 4 2 1 6 1 17 9 5 4 4 3 16 16 33 23.9 49.3 2.1 4.4 0 0 0 2 0 3 C 4 1 0 1 9 2 18 26.9 2.4 3 App.; Total 5 13 11 1 10 9 10 4 33 1 Traffic Data Service Southwest P.O. Box 1544 Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 Fax (619) 390-8427 Groups P'inteo• Group 1 W 13:h Sree: Wilson Ave Westbound 1 Northbound Left Thru 1 P,ight • Peds 1 e 7 7 1 2 14 '4 1 2 16 13 1 g 1' 8 1 18 48 42 4 6 5 9 13 9 5 2 9 7 5 6 22 28 27 67 1 40 21.6 9.0 i 5.4 76 41,1 10.2 69 37.3 9.2 2 0 0 2 4 App. n, Total I 22; 3C 31 25 108 20 27 : 18' 121 77 Left Thru Right; Peds App. Total 7 22 7 - 2 36 7 52 9 1 68 11 49 7 2 67 7 44 1 62 32 167 34 1 6 0 8 185 4C '1.8 24.81 5.4 30 14 7 10 2 4 18 8 1 10 6 2 17 1 68 30 14 106 235 69.3 31.5 45 i 8 26 64 20 339 18.9 8.6 45.4 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No W 18th Street -1 Eastbound App.1 Excw. Total! Total Left Thru Right Pads 2 7 2• 0 11 3 5 10 4 1 19 4 2 14 4 3 20 8 6 2C 7 2 33 4 15 51 17 6 83 17 4 11 2 15 3 15 3 16 12 57 0 0 2 1 2 0 0 1 4 2 151 9 19; 5 20 2 19 6 73: 22 27 108 21 8 156'. 39 17.3 69,2 13.5 3.6 14.5 2.8 20.9 1 5.0 Start Time I Left Thru R'.gnt Peak Hour From 07:00 to 06:45 Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 07:15 Volume 10 21 8 Percent 25.6 53.8 20.5 07:45 Volume 4 6 Peak Factor High Int. 07:15 Volume 1 weak Factor Wilson Ave Sorthbound App. 1 Total . W 18th Street W;Iscn Ave Westbound Northbound Left i Thru Right I App. 1 Total Left . Thru Right App. Total , :07114040 :00114040 : 3/29/2007 :1 Inclu. Total 74 130 123 131 Int. Total! 77 134 129 135 475 90 99 73 78 74 76 52 58 289 311 747 786 95.0 Left Thru Right App' f Int. Total Total W 18th Street Eastbound 39 16 15.1 11 6 07:30 8 4 13• 2 0.750 1 1 46 44 105• 26 43.4 41.5 I 10.7 11 8 25: •7 1 07:15 16 13 31 7 0.855 175 41 2421 17 55 72.3 16.9 19.5 63.2 44 11 62 1 6 20 07:45 52 9 68.1 6 20 0.890 1 15 87 474 17.2 7 33 ; 131 7 331 0.659 1 C.905 Weather: Clear & Dry Counted By: S. Manglafico Board #: D1-1307 Loc: W 18th Street & Wilson Ave Traffic Data Service Southwest P.O. Box 1544 Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 Fax (619) 390-8427 WW1 Ave O In Total 206! ' 35 27 I I 8; 21 '01 P•7n; T.v Let; .J North pi 29 2007 7:1- 00 AM i29,2007 B:C0:0C AM Group 1 Left Thor Right 261 176! 41' l � 52 zaz ; Lit Cu; In otv Mk, Ave File Name : 07114040 Site Code : 00114040 Start Date : 3/29,/2007 Page No : 2 Weather: Clear & Dry Counted By: S. Mangiafico Board #: D1-1307 Loc: W 18th Street & Wilson Ave Wilson Ave Southbound Start Time Left Thru 1 Rlgnt Peds i App' 1 Total 14:00 1 2 3 0 61 14:15 0 4 1 1 5 14:30 3 12 5 1 14:45 '. 5 2 0 Tctal 5 23 11 2 15:OC 1 8 7 0 15:15 2 8 4 1 15:3C 7 6 7 0 15:45 6 8 7 0 Total 16 3C 25 (-I ' Traffic Data Service Southwest P.O. Box 1544 Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 Fax (619) 390-8427 Groups Printed- Group 1 W 18th Street Wilson Ave Westbound Northbound, T 1 -1--App. Left Tnv Right' Pads iota, Lett . Thru I R':ght 1 Peds• Total 3 8 8 1 19 4 14 6 1 24. 5 5 5 15 2 1'. 5 3 18I 20 5 6 5 0 16 3 10 4 2 17', 8 3 13 5 C 18 2 8 6 0 161 39 16 29 23 2 681 11 43 21 6 75. W 18th Stree: Eastbound _el j Thru Right Peds File Name : 07114041 Site Code : 00114041 Start Date : 3/29/2007 Page No : 1 App. Total 7 13 4 3 24 1 16 1 1 18I 9 21 4 4 33 5 27 3 2 35 Exclu, Inclu. Tota, To:a! 5 73 6 56 7 86 2 77 21 77 12 10 110 20 292 16 I 4 16 4 4 24 i C 23 8 4 3' 1 11 20 1 0 32 8 14 1 5 12 8 2 25 i 1 14 7 0 22 ! 7 26 3 3 "1 6 20 1 3 10 6 0 19I 1 14 9 0 24 18 32 5 0 3955 0 1 211 3 5 4 0 12i 2 14 4 C 20 15 22 2 15 43 22 6 80 4 65 28 19. 51 100 11 4 162 16:00 5 10 9 0 24 3 16:15 3 7 3 0 13 2 16:30 E 8 3 0 17 4 _ 16:45 1 7 4 0 12; 4 "rota, 15 32 19 -- 13 :7:00 3 17:15 17:30 4 17:45 0 Total 8 7 6 2 10 1 0 8 4 0 5 3 3 30 14 161 5 12 2 161 8 8 10 9 2 14 9 6 5 4 37 21 10 7 9 3 6 2 6 6 (!2 25 31 18 3 4 4 1 12 14 2 11 5 24 I '8 32 5 0 55 i 25 1 8 1 1 1 20 1 8 25 6 2 39 191 9 10 3 20 22 20 2 2 44I 13• 1 17 9 0 271 12 21 4 2 37• 71 I 5 45 41 .2) 0'. 60 98 17 6 175 1 22 l 141 16 22 7 74 1 1 2 4 17 5 4 14 10 0 10 12 1 17 16 0 58 43 CO Grand Total 44 115 69 3 228 69 140 84 27 2931 24 211 133 24 Apprcn % 19.3 50.4 30.3 I 23.5 47.8 29.7 6.5 57.3 36.1 Total% 3.0 7.8 4.7 15.5 4.7 9.5 5.7 19.9, 1.6 14.4 9.0 Southbound APP 14 App Start Time 1 Le't_ Tnru Right Total ; -ett Tnru Right I Total Peak I -.our From 14:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Intersection 15:15 Volume 2C 32 27 Percent 25.3 40.5 34.2 15:30 Volume 7 6 7 Peak Factor Hign In:. 16:00 1 15:15 Volume 5 10 9 24 1 5 Peak °actor C.823 , 22 25 23 35 368 j 21 21 7 22 3 18 7 18 39 79 103 97 118 02 15 (4 C7) E 7 9 3 27 5 0 47 1 9 3 0 32 2 0 23 2 7 5 32 10 17 5 134 , 22 117 97 100 In:. Total 78 62 93 79 312 111 103 118 93 425 125 104 109 92 430 107 116 83 84 78 80 97�� 107 ('.:i 387 170 354 57 25 581, 64 1470 1554 29.3 60.9 9.8 25.0 j 11.6 24.1 3.9 39.5 ' 54 94.6 Wilson Ave r W 18th Street Westbound Wilson Ave Northbound Left I Thru R g'..t Total I 79 14 36 20 701 6 53 20.3 51.4 28.6 6.7 58.9 20 . 3 1C 6 19I 1 14 1 15:30 12 8 25 1 14 0.700 j Left W 18th Street Eastbound Thru I Right i To:a I Int. Total • 3' 9C 58 112 15 185 424 34.4 31.4 60.5 8.1 9 24 18 32 5 55 118 0.898 9 24I 15:30 18 0.938 , 32 5 55 0.841 I Weather: Clear & Dry Counted By: S. Mangiafico Board #: D1-1307 Loc: W 18th Street & Wilson Ave Traffic Data Service Southwest P.O. Box 1544 Lakeside, CA 92040 (619) 390-8495 Fax (619) 390-8427 W lson Ave 01.1 In Total 1311 I—17_ 210 1 i 2i 321 201 Al ht Thn, Left Nol;n !t' 2&2307 3:15:00 P11 3.'232307 4:03:CO PI." Qrouo . I r4 Left T'ry Pigh' 3 31 611 Ou; In Total Mlle,' Ave. File Name : 07114041 Site Code : 00114041 Start Date : 3/29/2007 Page No : 2 VehicleCount-142 Page 1 VehicleCount-142 — English (ENU) Datasets: Site: Direction: Survey Duration: File: Identifier: Algorithm: Data type: Profile: Filter time: Included classes: Speed range: Direction: Separation: Name: Scheme: Units: In profile: Traffic Data Service Southwest Vehicle Counts [114411 Wilson Ave - N/O 18th Street 7 - North bound A>t3, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 17.38 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 6:40 Monday, April 09, 2007 Z:lmcdata\Harris12007\114\1144109Apr2007.ECO (Plus) E395JD8W MC56 6 [MC551 (c)Microcom 02/03/01 Factory default Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) 18:00 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 7:00 Thursday, April 05, 2007 1,2,3,4,5,6, 7,8,9, 10, 11, 12, 13 5 - 100 mph. South (bound) All -(Headway) Factory default profile Vehicle classification (Scheme F99) Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton) Vehicles = 749 / 4877 (15.36%) ' Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - Total=80 (Incomplete) , 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0000 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1300 1600 170n 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 23 13 19 9 10 6 - - - - - 7 4 5 3 4 2 _ - 4 4 0 3 3 4 8 2 3 2 1 0 - .. _ _ _ _ .. 4 7 1 t 2 0 • Wednesday, April 04, 2007 - Total=630, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0300 66e0 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 3 1 0 1 2 5 23 24, 25 40 36 55 38 35 52 55 77 49 2 1 0 0 0 0 4 2 5 9 9 16 13 5 7 10 19 15 1 0 0 0 0 2 5 7 8 7 7 9 L, 7 11 17 16 12 O 0 0 1 1 '1 7 7 7 13 8 20 3 12 18 8 23 13 O 0 0 0 1 0 7 R 5 11 12 10 13 11 14 20 19 9 AM Peak 1045 - 1145 (57), AM PHF-0.71 PM Peak 1545 - 1645 (78), PM PHF_0.85 • Thursday, April 05, 2007 - Total=39 (incomplete) , 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0100 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 5 3 1 4 1 10 15 29 9 6 6 8 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 23 16 20 8 13 4 2 11 1 4 9 2 2 2 3 3 / J 2 4 5 3 4 3 2 14011 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 1 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 3 6 4 4 2 5 2 0 0 VehicleCount-138 Page 1 /ehicleCount-138 — English (ENUZ Datasets: Site: Direction: Survey Duration: File: Identifier: Algorithm: Data type: Profile: Filter time: Included lasses: Speed range: Direction: Separation: Name: Scheme: Units: In profile: Traffic Data Service Southwest Vehicle Counts [114431 Wilson Ave - S/O 18th Street 7 - North bound A>B, South bound B>A., Lane: 0 17:09 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 6:18 Monday, April 09, 2007 Z:lrncdata\Harris\2007\114\1144309Apr2007.ECO (Plus) M387WA3J MC56-6 [MC55j (c)Microcom 02/03/01 Factory default Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) 18:00 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 7:00 Thursday, April 05, 2007 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 5 - 100 mph. North (bound) All - (I leadway) Factory default profile Vehicle classification (Scheme F99) Non metric (ft, mi, It/s, mph, Ib, ton) Vehicles - 1568 / 4453 (35.21%) * Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - Total=172 (Incomplete) , 15 minute drops 0000 0.100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0/00 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 67 36 18 28 16 1- ' Wednesday, April 04, 2007 - Total=1258, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1700 1300 1400 6 2 2 3 4 44 102 141 77 70 72 69 69 89 95 O 0 1 1 1 7 18 22 26 19 20 16 15 25 O 1 1 ' 1 0 6 19 49 19 70 13 20 13 21 1 I 0 0 1 13 79 45 17 21 12 18 21 19 9 0 0 I 2 18 36 25 15 10 25 15 70 24 AM Peak 0645 -0745 (152), AM PHF=0.78 PM Peak 1345 - 1445 (98), PM PHF:).98 25 24 25 21 26 12 10 8 6 2 12 10 .1 11 6 4 16 9 2 1 4 L 13 5 5 5 0 0 1500 1600 1100 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200_2300 88 93 75 48 46 25 18 15 5 25 28 18 12 12 9 2 3 0 22 20 26 16 10 6 f 4 2 21 14 18 11 12 36 6 1 20 31 13 9 12 i 4 2 2 ` Thursday, April 05, 2007 - Total=138 (Incomplete) , 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0100 0400 0500 0600 0/00 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1100 1800 1900 2000 7100 2200 2100 _ 1 3 0 7 8 37 79 —_ _ _.—_.. ._ - - — - _- 0 0 , 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 5 0 2 5 2 2 IS IS lc 16 20 27 0 0 3 3 0 0 / 5 VehicleCounl.144 Page I VehicleCount-144 — English (ENU) Datasets: Site: Direction: Survey Duration: File: Identifier: Algorithm: Data type: Profile: Fitter time: Included classes: Speed range: Direction: Separation: Name: Scheme: Units: In profile: Traffic Data Service Southwest Vehicle Counts [11442] !l8th Street - E!O Wilson Ave 4 - West bound, A hit first., Lane: 0 18:34 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 6:40 Monday, April 09, 2007 Z:\mcdata Harris\2007\ 114\UM 11442409.EC0 (Plus) M463P03F MC56-6 (MC55] (c)Microcorn 02/03/01 Factory default Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) 19:00 Tuesday, April 03,2007 => 7:00 Thursday, April 05, 2007 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 5-100mph. West (bound) Ali - (Headway) Factory default profile Vehicle classification (Scheme F99) Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, Ib, ton) Vehicles = 1444 / 2789 (51.77%) ' Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - Total=100 (Incomplete) ,15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 o;00 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1100 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 7100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 26 34 20 16 4 8 6 7 5 6 9 7 12 6 6 4 5 2 4 2 0 ' Wednesday, April 04, 2007 - Total=1174, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0100 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2 2 2 1 16 84 98 95 52 56 67 77 88 93 74 72 77 66 61 29 30 33 14 5 O 1 0 1 1 1 21 25 9 11 13 20 19 19 15 22 21 19 15 7 13 9 2 0 O 0 0 0 2 l0 18 25 14 15 12 27 15 28 22 18 19 19 16 10 6 9 5 5 O 0 1 0 3 18 23 28 14 11 19 18 26 22 14 13 19 18 17 4 8 11 4 0 2 1 1 0 10 29 36 17 15 19 23 17 28 24 23 19 18 10 13 8 3 4 3 0 AM Peak 0645 - 0745 (114), AN PHF-0.79 P88 Peak 1230 - 1330 (101), PM PMF_ 0.90 • Thursday, April 05, 2007 - Tota1-170 (Incomplete) , 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 loon t100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 4 1 _. 1 - - ----_ 2200 2300 0 2 0 n 0 0 n 0 0 0 1 2 2 10 7 6 18 26 19 10 23 3i 0 0 0 2 0 2 l', VehicleCount-144 Page 1 ehicleCount-144 — English (ENU) Datasets: Site: Direction: Survey Duration: File: Identifier: Algorithm: Data type: Profile: Fitter time: Included classes: Speed range: Direction: Separation: Name: Scheme: Units: In profile: Traffic Data Service Southwest Vehicle Counts [114441 t18th Street - W/O Wilson Ave 8 - East bound A>B, West bound B>A., lane: 0 18:10 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 15:47 Friday, April 06, 2007 Z:\mcdata\Harris\20071114\UM11444406-ECO (Plus) M425JZ70 MC56-6 [MC55] (c)Microcorn 02/03/01 Factory default Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) 19:00 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 7:00 Thursday, April 05, 2007 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13 5 - 100 mph. East (bound) All - (Headway) Factory default profile Vehicle classification (Scheme F99) Non metric (ft, rni, Ws, mph, Ib, ton) Vehicles = 1664 / 3391 (49.07%) ' Tuesday, April 03, 2007 - Total=119 (Incomplete) , 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 Wednesday, April 04, 2007 - Total=1442, 15 minute drops 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 0700 0000 0900 1000 1100 1200 6 8 5 2 9 14 56 64 66 72 75 88 101 1 1 7 l 0 3 10 17 13 19 17 22 32 0 1 0 0 1 1 21 11 21 16 19 23 19 2 3 3 1 4 1 14 19 21 16 21 10 31 3 3 0 0 3 5 11 17 11 21 38 25 19 Akl Peak 1145 - 1245 1107). AM PHF=0.84 P81 Peak 1515 - 1615 (189), PM PHF=0.89 1400 1500 1000 1/00 1300 1400 99 119 21 74 16 29 35 37 27 29 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 - 44 31 19 20 5 12 14 5 11 3 13 3 4 1 1 10 11 1 3 0 9 3 7 5 1 1500 1500 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 177 171 110 61 31 32 34 24 13 41 53 31 18 8 9 13 43 35 29 18 8 3 7 52 45 21 15 9 14 5 41 44 23 10 6 6 9 12 7 1 2 4 4 ' Thursday, April 05, 2007- Total=103 (Incomplete) ,15 minute drops . 0000 0100 0200 0300 0400 0500 0600 070o 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1000 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 11 4 6 1 9 16 56.--. —.--_- 0 3 6 2 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 5 3 10 1 11 7 15 20 1 0 2 3 0 3 6 2 Traffic -Data Service Southwest Speed Histogram SpeedHist-84 - English (ENU) Datasets: Site: Direction: Survey Duration: File: Identifier: Algorithm: Data type: Profile: Filter time: Included classes: Speed range: Direction: Separation: Name: Scheme: Units: In profile: Speed Statistics [114421 !l8th Street - EIO Wilson Ave 4 - West bound, A hit first., Lane: 0 18:34 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 6:40 Monday, April 09, 2007 Z:lmcdata\Harris\2007\1 14\UM11442409.ECO (Plus) M463P03F MC56-6 [MC55] (c)Microcom 02/03/01 Factory default Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) 0:00 Wednesday, April 04, 2007 -> 0:00 Thursday, April 05, 2007 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 0 - 100 mph. West (bound) All - (1leadway) Factory default profile Vehicle classification (Scheme F99) Non metric (ft, mi, f /s, mph, lb, ton) Vehicles = 1174 / 2789 (42.09%) Vehicles = 1174 Posted speed limit = 0 mph, Exceeding = 1174 (100.00 % ), Mean Exceeding = 23.20 mph Maximum = 36.5 mph, Minimum 5.6 mph, Mean = 23.2 mph 85% Speed = 26.8 mph, 95% Speed = 29.3 mpli, Median = 23.0 mph 10 mph Pace - 19 - 29, Number in Pace = 971 (82.71%) Variance =15.02, Standard Deviation - 3.88 mph Speed I-fistoaram SpeedHist-84 (N:nrrefric) Site:11442CW Description: ! 18it&eet - GOWIscr1Ae Filter time: Or00 wzd-Esc Pp 04, J J/ > OAO l)usdv, P} rl Oa d7U/ Filter: Cfs(1234567891011 1213) Cir(VI[ S3(0103) H ectAcv>q Scheme: Vefidedassificdim(SdiareF91 Number of Vehicles(1 mph) Speed (mph) SpeedHist-84 — English (ENU) Datasets: Site: Direction: Survey Duration: File: Identifier: Algorithm: Data type: Profile: Filter time: Included classes: Speed range: Direction: Separation: Name: Scheme: Units: In profile: Speed Statistics --Traffic Data Service Southwest Speed Histogram [11444J It8th Street - W/O Wilson Ave 8 - East bound A>B, West bound B>A., Lane: 0 18:10 Tuesday, April 03, 2007 => 15:47 Friday, April 06, 2007 l-\mcdata\Harris\2007\114\11M11444406.EC0 (Plus) M425JZ7Q MC56-6 (MC55] (c)Microcom 02/03/01 Factory default Axle sensors - Paired (Class/Speed/Count) 0:00 Wednesday, April 04, 2007 => 0:00 Thursday, April 05, 2007 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 0 - 100 mph. East (bound) All (Headway) Factory default profile Vehicle classification (Scheme F99) Non metric (ft, mi, ft/s, mph, lb, ton) Vehicles = 1442 / 3391 (42.52%) Vehicles - 1442 Posted speed limit = 0 mph, Exceeding = 1442 (100.00%), Mean Exceeding = 29.28 mph Maximum - 47.2 mph, Minimum - 5.6 mph, Mean 29.3 mph 85% Speed = 34.9 mpli, 95% Speed = 37.8 mph, Median = 29.3 mph 10 mph Pace 24 - 34, Number in Pace - 943 (65.40`Y.) Variance - 29.16, Standard Deviation - 5.40 mph Speed 1stogram SpeedHist-84 (Natnitic) Site: 114440AE Description: ! 18hSrad- WOWlsrnhe Filter time: MO W eli April 04, au/ -:>Q00 lhrsd; Ppnl C6, ATV Filter: C15(1234567891011 1213) Dir(Q Sp(010a 1-baziroAA Scheme: Ve idedassfic tim(SlueF925 o. E r re m U O L m E z 0 14 a3 84 Speed (mph) 93 112 lai 140 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of red curb no parking' along the northwest comer of the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane (D. Yamane, TSC Item No. 2007-22) PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT EXT. 4382 EXPLANATION Stephen Manganiello Please see attached. Engineering J Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION _. Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION SS ON COMMEDATION At their meeting on June 13, 2007 the Traffic Safety Committee approved the staff recommendation to install red curb "no parking" along the northwest comer of the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane. ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Explanation 2. Staff Report to the Traffic Safety Committee A-200 (Rev. 7/03) Explanation Ms. Ditas Yamane, a member of the Paradise Ridge Homeowners Association, has requested red curb "no parking" at the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane. Ms. Yamane stated that vehicles often park on the northwest corner of the intersection, blocking the pedestrian ramp and part of a residential driveway. Ms. Yamane has requested the red curb on behalf of the Homeowners Association. Staff visited the site and agrees that red curb is needed. Staff recommends painting 20 feet of red curb "no parking" along the west side of Plaza Entrada at Hollyhock Lane leading up to the curb return, from the curb return to the near side of the pedestrian ramp, and from the far side of the pedestrian ramp to the residential driveway located just west of the ramp. TSC 2007-22 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 151 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO INSTALL RED CURB NO PARKING ALONG THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF PLAZA ENTRADA AND HOLLYHOCK LANE WHEREAS, Ditas Yamane, on behalf of the Paradise Ridge Homeowners Association, has requested the installation of red curb no parking at the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane because vehicles parked on the northwest corner of the intersection block the pedestrian ramp and part of the residential driveway; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on June 13, 2007, the Traffic Safety Committee approved the installation of twenty -feet of red curb no parking along the northwest corner of the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the City Engineer to establish twenty -feet of red curb no parking along the northwest corner of the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane. PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 2007. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney NATIONAL CITY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT FOR JUNE 13, 2007 ITEM TITLE: REQUEST FOR RED CURB "NO PARKING" PARKING AT THE INTERSECTION OF PLAZA ENTRADA AND HOLLYHOCK LANE (BY: D. YAMANE, PHONE NO. 619-474-2500} PREPARED BY: Stephen Manganiello, Engineering Department DISCUSSION: Ms. Ditas Yamane, a member of the Paradise Ridge Homeowners Association, has requested red curb "no parking" at the intersection of Plaza Entrada and Hollyhock Lane. Ms. Yamane stated that vehicles often park on the northwest corner of the intersection, blocking the pedestrian ramp and part of a residential driveway. Ms. Yamane has requested the red curb on behalf of the Homeowners Association. Staff visited the site and agrees that red curb is needed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends painting 20 feet of red curb "no parking" along the west side of Plaza Entrada at Hollyhock Lane leading up to the curb return, from the curb return to the near side of the pedestrian ramp, and from the far side of the pedestrian ramp to the residential driveway located just west of the ramp. EXHIBITS: 1. Correspondence 2. Location Map 3. Photos 200/-22 Paradise Ridge Homeowners Association A nonprofit mutual lx:nefit corporation National City, California 05/07/07 Traffic & Safety Commission City of National City Attention: Steve Manganello, Traffic Engineer RE: Red - No parking Zone on curbside of Hollyhock Lane & Plaza Entrada Dear Steve, Thank you very much for the information over the phone earlier. As per our conversation, we are the Paradise Ridge Homeowners Association located at Paradise Valley & Plaza Blvd in the new Paradise Valley Subdivision developed by Pacific Scene Homes. A neighborhood of 37 single detached family residences. We have been monitoring this location therefore we would like to request that a red -no parking zone be installed at this curb to prevent another accident and future accidents to happen as vision is obscured when a vehicle is parked at this curb for vehicles making a right turn to Hollyhock Lane. Our HOA Chairman has been diligently requesting to members to not park at this curb to prevent accidents. Please be very kind to inform us when we would speak before the traffic safety commission (if required) with regards to this request. Should you have any questions, please call (619) 474-2500 or email to ditasvamane(tcox. net Thank you very much for your consideration. Respectfully, &tcw Ditas Yamane, Secretary Paradise Ridge Homeowners Association Cc: Traffic Safety Fngineer / Traffic Safety Commission / HOA Board Intersection of Plaza Entrada & Ilollyhock Lane (looking south) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .AEETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of 3- minute passenger loading zone and handicap parking adjacent to Olivewood Elementary School on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street (L. Vicario, Principal, TSC Item No. 2007-21) PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT EXT. 4382 Stephen Manganiello Engineering EXPLANATION Please see attached. Environmental Review N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. -- BOARD / COMMISSION 6OMMEDATION At their meeting on June 13, 2007 the Traffic Safety Committee approved the staff recommendation to install 3-minute passenger loading zone and handicap parking adjacent to Olivewood Elementary School on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street. ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Explanation 2. Staff Report to the Traffic Safety Committee A-200 (Rev. 7/03) Explanation Ms. Luz Vicario, Principal of Olivewood Elementary School, requested the establishment of passenger loading zone and handicap parking on F Avenue adjacent to the school. According to Principal Vicario, parents use the staff parking lot located on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26`h Street, as a loading zone since no loading zone is provided in front of the school on F Avenue. Handicap parents and visitors also use the two handicap parking spaces in the staff lot since no handicap parking is provided in front of the school on F Avenue. Parents walk through the staff parking lot with their children as a short-cut to the front office which presents safety concerns due to pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. Principal Vicario also stated that staff vehicles in the parking lot have been damaged due to these traffic trends. Principal Vicario would like to keep the gate to the staff parking lot closed during school hours and drop-off/pick-up periods to improve safety. Staff met with Principal Vicario and observed the traffic conditions and safety concerns stated above when students are released from school in the afternoon. Staff agrees that the school's staff parking lot should not be used as a loading zone or pedestrian cut - through route and should remain closed to parents/visitors. Staff also observed a fair number of handicapped drivers using the staff parking lot to pick up their children. Staff recommends the establishment of a 3-minute passenger loading zone (approximately 100 feet) and handicap parking (approximately 45 feet) adjacent to Olivewood Elementary School on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street. The passenger loading zone shall be restricted to the hours of 7:OOam to 9:O0am and 2:O0pm to 4:O0pm, Monday through Friday. TSC 2007-21 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 152 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO INSTALL A THREE -MINUTE PASSENGER LOADING ZONE AND HANDICAP PARKING ADJACENT TO OLIVEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ON THE EAST SIDE OF F AVENUE, NORTH OF 26TH STREET WHEREAS, Luz Vicario, principal of Olivewood Elementary School, has requested the installation of a passenger loading zone and handicap parking on F Avenue adjacent to the school for use by parents and visitors; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on June 13, 2007, the Traffic Safety Committee approved the installation of approximately 100 feet of three -minute passenger loading zone, enforceable Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., and approximately 45 feet of handicap parking adjacent to Olivewood Elementary School on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the City Engineer to establish approximately 100 feet of three - minute passenger loading zone, enforceable Monday through Friday, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m., and approximately 45 feet of handicap parking adjacent to Olivewood Elementary School on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street. PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 2007. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney NATIONAL CITY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT FOR JUNE 13, 2007 ITEM TITLE: REQUEST TO ESTABLISH PASSENGER LOADING ZONE AND HANDICAP PARKING ON "F" AVENUE ADJACENT TO OLIVEWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (BY: L. VICARIOL PRINCIPAL, PHONE NO. 619-336-8700) PREPARED BY: Stephen Manganiello, Engineering Department DISCUSSION: Ms. Luz Vicario, Principal of Olivewood Elementary School, has requested the establishment of passenger loading zone and handicap parking on F Avenue adjacent to the school. According to Principal Vicario, parents use the staff parking lot located on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street, as a loading zone since no loading zone is provided in front of the school on F Avenue. Handicap parents and visitors also use the two handicap parking spaces in the staff lot since no handicap parking is provided in front of the school on F Avenue. Parents walk through the staff parking lot with their children as a short-cut to the front office which presents safety concerns due to pedestrian/vehicle conflicts. Principal Vicario also stated that staff vehicles in the parking tot have been damaged due to these traffic trends. Principal Vicario would like to keep the gate to the staff parking lot closed during school hours and drop-off/pick-up periods to improve safety. Staff met with Principal Vicario and observed the traffic conditions and safety concerns stated above when students are released from school in the afternoon. Staff agrees that the school's staff parking lot should not be used as a loading zone or pedestrian cut - through route and should remain closed to parents/visitors. Staff also observed a fair number of handicapped drivers using the staff parking lot to pick up their children. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the establishment of a 3-minute passenger loading zone (approximately 100 feet) and handicap parking (approximately 45 feet) adjacent to Olivewood Elementary School on the east side of F Avenue, north of 26th Street. The passenger loading zone shall be restricted to the hours of 7:O0am to 9:00arn and 2:00prn to 4:O0pm, Monday through Friday. EXHIBITS: 1. Correspondence 2. Location Map 3. Photos 2007-21 TATIONAL, CHOOL ISTRK May 24, 2007 City of National City Engineering Department 1 243 National City Boulevard National City, Ca 91950-4301 Attention: Stephen Manganiello Dear Stephen, Please allow me to congratulate you on your position here in the City of National City. I'm sure you will find that we have a great city and that we have great things happening here. At the same time I would like to share a concern we're experiencing here at Olivewood Elementary School. As far as elementary schools go in the city, Olivewood is the largest. We have approximately R0 staff members and our staff parking lot only holds approximately 30 vehicles. Within these spots we have two designated handicapped spots for our employees. We do not have handicapped parking for our community outside of our staff parking. Consequently, we must provide handicapped access to our parents and community members who conduct school business here at Olivewood School. Because of this access, several problems have surfaced: • Parents are currently using our staff parking as loading and unloading • Several of our cars have been either scratched or damaged by other vehicles and no one is claiming responsibility • Students, parents and people in general are using the parking lot as a short cut to our front office making this a very dangerous situation In addition, we have very little parking for parents out in front and there is a much congestion and double parking that happens on a daily basis. We arc proposing the following solution: (a) 3-minute loading and unloading spots directly in front of the school on `F' Avenue and (b) at least one handicapped parking spot for our parents and/or community members. Thank you so much for your attention and 1 look forward to a response from you and your department. Sincerely, i) CiN� Luz S. Vicario, Principal Olivcwood Elementary School OLIVEWOOD SCHOOL Luz Vicario — Principal • Sonia Ruan —Assistant Principal 2505 'F' Avenue • National City, CA 91950 • (619) 336-8700 • Fax (619) 336-8755 • http://nsd.us Creating Successful Learners... Now Location Map F Avenue adjacent to Olivewood Elementary (east side of street) F Avenue adjacent to Olivewood Elementary (east side of street) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AEETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of 1-hour time restricted parking from 8am to 6pm along the west side of National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. (Local Business Owners, TSC Item No. 2007-19) PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT EXT. 4382 Stephen Manganieilo Engineering EXPLANATION Please see attached. Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By! Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMEDATION At their meeting on June 13, 2007 the Traffic Safety Committee approved the staff recommendation to install 1-hour time restricted parking from 8am to 6pm along the west side of National City Boulevard between 8'" Street and Plaza Boulevard. ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Explanation 2. Staff Report to the Traffic Safety Committee A-200 {Rev. 7103) Explanation City Community Development requested, on behalf of local business owners, that staff investigate the potential for time -restricted parking on the west side of National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. Staff investigated the site which includes curbside parking for up to approximately 14 vehicles, most of which is located between Plaza Boulevard and the 9`h Street pedestrian crossing. Currently curbside parking at this location is unrestricted, which often results in vehicles parked for long durations. The local businesses at this location rely heavily on turnover. Time -restricted parking will increase vehicle turnover. Staff also verified that the existing curbside parking along National City Boulevard located across the street and to the north is predominantly time -restricted 2-hour and 1-hour parking. Based on the above findings and letters of support from local businesses and the Southwestern College (located adjacent to the site), staff recommends installation of 1- hour time restricted parking from 8am to 6pm, daily. TSC 2007-19 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 153 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ESTABLISH ONE -HOUR TIME RESTRICTED PARKING BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 8:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD BETWEEN 8TH STREET AND PLAZA BOULEVARD WHEREAS, the National City Community Development Commission of the City of National City, on behalf of local business owners, requested time -restricted parking on the west side of National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard to allow parking for customers; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on June 13, 2007, the Traffic Safety Committee approved one -hour time restricted parking between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on the west side of National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the City Engineer is authorized to establish one -hour time restricted parking between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on the west side of National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 2007. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Della, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney 1 NATIONAL CITY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT FOR JUNE 13, 2007 ITEM TITLE: REQUEST TO ESTABLISH 1-HOUR TIME RESTRICTED PARKING ON THE WEST SIDE OF NATIONAL CITY BOULEVARD BETWEEN 8T" STREET AND PLAZA BOULEVARD (BY: LOCAL BUSINESS OWNERS) PREPARED BY: Stephen Manganiello, Engineering Department DISCUSSION: City Community Development has requested, on behalf of local business owners, that staff investigate the potential for time -restricted parking on the west side of National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. Staff investigated the site which includes curbside parking for up to approximately 14 vehicles, most of which is located between Plaza Boulevard and the 9th Street pedestrian crossing. Currently curbside parking at this location is unrestricted, which often results in vehicles parked for long durations. The local businesses at this location rely heavily on turnover. Time -restricted parking will increase vehicle turnover. Staff also verified that the existing curbside parking along National City Boulevard located across the street and to the north is predominantly time -restricted 2-hour and 1- hour parking. Based on the above findings and letters of support from local businesses and the Southwestern College (located adjacent to the site), staff recommends installation of 1- hour time restricted parking from 8am to 6pm, daily. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends installation of 1-hour time restricted parking from 8am to 6pm along the west side of National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. EXHIBITS: 1. Correspondence 2. Location Map 3. Photos 2007-19 SOUTHWESTERN COt.L GE Greg R. Sandoval Interim Superintendent/President Governing Board David J. Agasto Jorge Dominguez, Ph.D. Jean Rocsch, Ed.D. Yolanda Salcido "Ferri Valladolid May 29, 2007 To Whom It May Concern: Due to public comment, I am in support of limiting the parking time along southbound National City Boulevard between 8th Street and Plaza Boulevard. Limited parking time along National City Boulevard will benefit the patrons of nearby businesses by offering more parking opportunities and encourage more customers to visit nearby establishments. Limited parking time would be in the best interests of patrons, businesses, and the City. If you require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (619) 2 1 6-6668. Sincerely, Christine M. Perri, Interim Dean I Iigher Education Center at National City Southwestern Community College District Southwestern Commend), Colkge rli,vict • 900 Otay Laic Road, Chula V iew CA 91910.7299.619.421-6700 • Fax 619.4824413 •'FrY 619-482 6470 • www.swc cc ca.us To: 41-6193364286 Page 2 of 2 2007 05-29 20•55:19 (GMT) 16193747233 From. Sam ibru I Whom It May Concern. Due to public comment, I am in support of limiting the parking time along southbound National City Boulevard between E314 Street and Plaza Boulevard Limited parking time along National City Boulevard will benefit the patrons of nearby businesses by offering more parking opportunities and encourage more customers to visit nearby establishments. Limited parking time would be in the best interests of patrons, businesses, and the City. Sincerely, iefv" Sant S. Azzu President Living Room Cafe National City Blvd. (south of 9'" Street, looking south) National City Blvd. (north of 9'" Street, looking north) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City of National City accepting the work from Portillo Concrete, Inc. approving the Contract Final Balance Change Order List with the final amount at $139,538.75, and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion for the Miscellaneous Concrete Improvement Project at Various Locations, Specification No. 06-02 PREPARED BY Yolando Vitug DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4414 EXPLANATION See Attached J Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement Approved By: &Al1 Finance Director The total final cost of the project was $139,536.75 with the retention amount at $13,953.87. Funding is avails through Account No. 109-409-500-598.6134 and 109-409-500-598-6137. Account No STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION H COMMEDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution 2. Contract Final Balance Change Order List 3_ Notice of Completion rola A-200 (Rev. 7/03) Attachment: On December 5, 2006 by Resolution No. 2006-246, the City Council awarded a contract to Portillo Concrete, Inc. for the Miscellaneous Concrete Improvement Project at Various Locations, Specification No. 06-02. Based upon the estimated bid quantities, the total bid cost for the project was $131,825.00. On February 26, 2007, the Contractor commenced the work. During the construction phase, certain bid quantities were adjusted to reflect the actual measured improvements in the field. As a result of the adjusted quantities the total cost was reduced from $131,825.75 to $126,048.75. The changes (highlighted) are further detailed in the attached Contract Final Balance Change Order List. On April 3, 2007, the Change Order No. One in the amount of $13,488 was approved by Resolution No. 2007-59 for the new American with Disability Act (ADA) requirements, truncated dome tiles (detectable warning devices) which were added to the new pedestrian ramps. Due to this change the total cost was increased from $126,048.75 to $139,536.75. On April 20, 2007, a final inspection was conducted and the work was found to be in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The Contractor has submitted the final contract documents for the project closure. The purpose of the Contract Final Balance Change Order List is to finalize the contract quantities and construction completion time, and to address the adjusted work for acceptance of the project completion. The total final contract amount for the construction is $139,536.75 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 154 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ACCEPTING THE WORK FROM PORTILLO CONCRETE, APPROVING THE CONTRACT FINAL BALANCE CHANGE ORDER LIST WITH THE FINAL AMOUNT OF $139,536.75, AND AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF COMPLETION FOR THE MISCELLANEOUS CONCRETE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City as follows: It appearing to the satisfaction of the Engineering Department that all work required to be done by Portillo Concrete for the Miscellaneous Concrete Improvement Project at Various Locations has been completed, the City Council of National City hereby accepts said work, approves the contract final balance change order list with the final amount of $139,536.75, authorizes the filing of a Notice of Completion, and orders that payment for said work be made in accordance with said contract. PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 2007. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney (Y)N FRA(:T FINAL BALANCE CHANGE ORDER LIST MISC. CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS. Page 1 of 2 SPECIFICATION NO. 06 02. CONTRACTOR: PORTII,I.O CONCRETE, INC. STARTED DATE : 02-26-07 ORIGINAL, CONTRACT AMOUNT: S131,825 COMPLETION DATE, : 04-20-07 No. 2 5 6 Description Clearing & Grubbing Including the SWI'PP Conc. Sidewalk RJR Per (;-7 Installation of Ped. Ramp Per G-28 (Modified) Installation of Ped. Ramp Per 6-29 (Modified) Installation of I'ed Ramp Per G- 31 or Mod.(w! Curb or Gravity 1Vali on PL) Remove & Replace Curb & Gutter Per G-2 9 Qt.} 1 5430 14 BID ITEMS Unit I.S SF EA EA Unit Price $7,500.00 $7.50 $1,500.00 Original Amount $7,500.00 $40,725.00 $21,000.00 Final Qty 1 4896.5 14 $1,500.00 EA $1,600.00 $12,000.00 $3,200.00 2 Final AmCnrrlt $7,500.00 $36,723.75 $21,000.00 $12,000.00 $3,200.00 30 LF $50.00 $1,500.00 52 Variable Thickness A.C. 7 TN $200.00 $1,400.00 7 Traffic Control I I,S $3,000.00 $3,000.00 1 Install New Sidewalk Per 5000 SF $7.50 $37,500.00 4750 G-7 10 11 C.O. 1 Crushed Miscellaneous Base Paving Bricks Remove & Replace (Re -Level) 'I"O'I'AL Truncated Domes GRAND TOTAL $2,600.00 $1,400.00 $3,000.00 $35,625.00 10 TN $100.00 $1,000.00 0 300 SF $10.00 $3.000.00 300 $131,825.00 24 EA $562.00 $13,488.00 ! 24 $145,313.00 $3,000.00 $126,048.75 $13,488.00 $ 139,536.75 CONTRACT FINAL BALANCE CHANGE ORDER LIST Page 2 of 2 MISC. CONCRETE IMPROVEMENT AT VARIOIIS LOCATIONS SPECIFICATION NO. 06-02. CONTRACTOR: PORIILLO CONCRETE, INC. STARTED DATE : 02-26-07 ORIGINAI, CONTRACT AMOUNT: $131,825 COMPLETION DATE : 04-20-07 The final total contract price for the construction to date is $139,536.75 The work was completed within 30 working days. The Contractor (PORTILLO CONCRETE, INC.) accepts this Final Contract Balance as full compensation for the work. Approval by: Din Dancshlar, City Project Manager Date Mario Portillo President, Portillo Concrete, Inc. Ce%/1 Date City of National City Resolution Number Date RECORDING REQ1 !FSTED 13i" 1W IL• N RL• CcRD} r) MAIL. TO: NAME: CrrY OF NATIONAL CITY ADDRESS: 1243 NATIONAL CITY BOl ILEI ARD NATIONAL CITY, cA 91950 NOTICE OF COMPLETION CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE SECTION 3093 NOTICE 1S HEREBY GIVEN of the completion on July 3, 2007 of the Miscellaneous Concrete Improvements at Various Locations, Spec. No. 06-02 work of improvement or portion of work of iniprovcmcnt under construction or alteration. on theremises located at Various Locations in National City, Ca 91950 Street Address City State Zip Code The undersigned owns the following interest or estate in said property:_ N/A Nature of the interest et estate of owner (tuottgugor, lessee, etc.) Said work of improvement was performed on the property pursuant to a contract with PORTILLO CONCRETE, INC. Nan of Onvinal Contractor 'Ile following work and material were supplied: Saw -Cutter Operators, Mason Laborer, Equipment. utility Trucks and Concrete Truck. General statement of kind of labor, services, equipment or materials The names and addresses ofco-owners are: N/A Dated , 2007; Joint tenants, tenants in common, or other owners Signature of Owner City of National City, 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 1, the undersigned, say: I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof; the same is true of my own knowledge. 1 declare under penalty of perjury that the forgoing is true and correct. Executed on , 2007, at , California. Signature RON MORRISON, MAYOR Noe on+ City of National City, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE TRANSFER WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION TO TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE TERMINATION OF THE EXISTING AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SUCH SERVICES WITH CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES PREPARED BY George H. Eiser, III Pt DEPARTMENT City Attorney (Ext. 4221) EXPLANATION Please see attached memorandum. Environmental Review v NIA Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Resolution A-200 (9/99) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950-4301 George H. Elser, III • City Attorney Phone: (619) 336-4220 Fax: (619) 336-4327 TDD: (619) 336-1615 E-mail: Attorney@ci.national-city.ca.us TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Proposed Transfer of Workers' Compensation Claims Service from Claims Management Service to Tristar Risk Management DATE: June 27, 2007 The City is self -insured for workers' compensation. It is necessary for the City to retain a workers' compensation administrator to supervise and administer the City's workers' compensation claims. Prior to contracting with Claims Management Services, the City's current workers' compensation administrator, the City obtained these services for many years from Tristar Risk Management, which also provides those services to the majority of the member cities of SANI)PIPA, the Pooled insurance authority to which the City belongs. The Risk Manager, who has extensive knowledge and experience in evaluating workers' compensation administrators, has recommended that the City would receive a better quality of service if claims management were to be performed by Tristar Risk Management rather then the City's current administrator. The existing agreement with Claims Management Services provides that the agreement may be terminated by the City upon 60 days' notice to the administrator. There are statutory provisions that the City must follow to ensure a smooth transition for injured employees in the event the agreement is terminated. While it is anticipated that there will be some initial transfer costs, and the base rate for services is slightly higher than with Tristar than with Claims Management, it is expected that the City will eventually realize savings in its primary Workers' Compensation program, in both indemnity and medical payments. If approved, the Tristar program will be reviewed two years from the inception of provision of services by the City Manager, the City Attorney and the Risk Manager. At that time, staff will look for measurable cost savings, claims data and general satisfaction with the third party administrator. GEORGE E1SER I11 City Attorney CiHE/gmo RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 155 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION TO TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE TERMINATION OF THE EXISTING AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SUCH SERVICES WITH CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES WHEREAS, the City of National City is self -insured for workers' compensation, and it is necessary to retain a workers' compensation administrator to supervise and administer the City's workers' compensation claims; and WHEREAS, prior to contracting with Claims Management Services, the City's current workers' compensation administrator, the City obtained these services for many years from Tristar Risk Management; and WHEREAS, a great majority of the member cities of SANDPIPA, the Pooled insurance authority to which the City belongs, utilize the claims administration services of Tristar Risk Management; and WHEREAS, the City's Risk Manager, who has extensive knowledge and experience in evaluating workers' compensation administrators, has recommended that the City would receive a better quality of service if claims management were to be performed by Tristar Risk Management rather then the City's current administrator; and WHEREAS, the existing agreement with Claims Management Services provides that the agreement may be terminated by the City upon 60 days' notice to the administrator; and WHEREAS, there are statutory provisions that the City must follow to ensure a smooth transition for injured employees in the event the agreement is terminated. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Risk Manager is hereby authorized to provide 60 days' notice of termination of the City's agreement with Claims Management Services. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the transfer of workers' compensation claims administration to Tristar Risk Management. PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 2007. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk George H. Eiser, III City Attorney .iETING DATE July03, 2007 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 8 ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER # 46 PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT D. Gallegos -Finance Finance EXPLANATION Tess E. Limfueco 619-336-1330 Ratification of Warrant Register # 46 per Government Section Code 37208. Environmental Review _ N/A Financial Statement Not applicable. Approved By: Fin!ce DirectdF Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $ 2,500,658.86 BOARD / COMMISSION REC MMENDA ION 6t,• ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Warrant Register#46 2. Workers Comp Warrant Register dated 5/16/07 3. Payroll Register dated 5/16/07 200 i5 9 : City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 46 5/22/2007 PAYEE LUTI I AND TURLEY INC. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Al.ERF-ALL CORPORATION ASBURY ENVIRONMENTAL SI•;RVIC AT&T/MCI AT&T/MCI BEST BESF & KRIEGLR LLP BEST BEST & KRIF.GER LLP BONITA PET HOSPIFAL CAPE CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL POOL CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL SECI.IRI CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT CARQULST AUTO PARTS CF,SNAUSKIJS CHEVRON USA, INC. CHOICEPOINT CITY Ol• SAN DIEGO CLEAN HARBORS CORPORATE EXPRESS COUNTY 13URNF.R COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CREST OFFSET PRINTING COMPANY CWEA-WORKSHOP DESCRIPTION FIRST PARTY PROPERTY LOSS PETTY CASH REPLENISHMENT }IATS FOR CHILDREN 50/50 COOLANT PFIONE 337-257-0757 SVC 3/1- 4/6/07 LONG DISTANCE 619 474 8857 CLAIM: RENFE LOVE. V. C N C CLAIM: AI .ISON HI INTER V. C N C ER ANIMAL. CARE FIRE/LTD MAY 2007 MUNICIPAL POOL RENOVATION MOP l45754 - KEYS PI)JI:I D MAY 2007 MOP 447557 GOLD U-JOINT 125 1'l.AN REIMBI JRSEMEN'F MOT' ,/ 45699 GAS CREDIT CARD AI1TC) TRACK DATABASE 2007 41'11 OTR SEWER SYSTEM HAZARDOUS WASTE PICK UP MOP 45704 OFTICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES PARADISE CREEK EDUC PARK COPIES OF T111'. CITY NEWSLETTER REGIST-WORKSI IOP'JOE SMITH CHK NO DATE. AMOUN 214858 5/16/07 24,321.65 214859 5/17/07 1,708.64 214860 5/7,2/07 415.83 214861 5/22/07 21)8.60 214862 5/22/07 1,040.77 214863 5/27/07 29.44 214864 5/22/07 21,009.50 214865 5/22/07 3.409.28 214866 5/22/07 111.00 214867 5/22/07 656.00 214868 5/22107 39,299.10 214869 5/22107 39.23 214870 5/22/07 1,599.00 214871 5/22/07 9.34 214872 5/22/07 392.22 21487'1 5/22/07 393.14 214874 5122107 100.00 214875 5/22/071,123,986.01) 214876 5/22/07 813.00 214877 5/22107 272.01 2148'/8 5; 22/07 989.52 214879 5122/07 2,587.50 214880 5/22107 6,664.53 214881 5/22/07 50.00 1 1)-MAX ENGINEERING INC DALEY & HEFT LLP DALEY & IIEFT LLP DAPPER TIRE COMPANY DAVIES DELL MARKETING CORP DELTA DENTAL DELTACARE(PM() DEPARTMENT OF 'TRANSPORT ATIO DEVELOPMENT SVCS, DIV OF BLDG/ DICERCIIIO DIXIEI.INE LUMBER CO. DOK.KE.N ENGINEERING DURRA INK APRIL SERVICES 2007 CLAIM: LETICIA RAZO V. C N C CLAIM: UNION HIGH SCI I V. C N C TIRES FOR CITY FLEET 125 PLAN REIMBURSEMENT DELL DIMENSION COMPUTERS DENTAL INS MAY 2007 DENIAL INS PMI MAY 2007 HI(il!WAY LIGJITING 2007 CBC RES PROV - VIRDEN F. RETIREE IIEAL'II I BENEFIT MAY'07 MOP /145707 PW SMALL TOOLS PROVIDJi PROFESSIONAL DESIGN MOP 46766 BUSINESS CARDS EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT EDD INS REIMI1 BENEFIT CHRGES ENTJ:NMANN - ROVIN COMPANY BADGE ORDER EXPPRIAN FIREFIGHTERS BOOKSTORE GONLALES CREDIT CHECKS FOR NEW I'D EMP HANDBOOK REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT GROSSMAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSO PRE.-EMP 1'SYCHOI.OGICAI. EXAMS GW SCHOOL. SUPPLY HAM RADIO OlJTLET HANASFIIRO HANSON AGGREGATES ES PACIFIC HARATYK HARRIS & ASSOCIATES HEALTH NEI. HEALTI( NET HEALTH NIA - HEAL .TH NET HEALTH NE! HOME DEPO l.'GECF HORIZON IUEAI.TH FAP HP! IN IE:RNATTONAL INC SUPPLIES FOR TINY TOTS GRADUATION - TRANSCEIVER REFUND INCORRECT CITATION CONCRETE SUPPLIES REFUND PROOF OF NON -LIABILITY APRII. 2007 SERVICES HEAL] 1! INS H0067A MAY'07 HEALIII INS MAY 2007 571 351 HEALTH INS MAY 2007 571 35F HEAI,TI1-FULL. NTWK 57135A MAY'07 1IEAI; II FRET INS 1100671' MAY'07 BARK NUGGETS F:MPLOYFF. ASS'1 PROGRAM MAY'07 POLAROJD 600 P1. I IS FILM 214882 5/22/07 20,351.28 214883 5/22/07 961.00 214884 5i22/07 544.08 214885 5/22/07 285., 214886 5/22/07 272.70 214887 5/22/07 12,968.44 214888 5/22/07 15,118.07 214889 5.'22/07 3.479.65 214890 5/22/07 4,432.46 214891 5/22/07 70.00 21489? .5/22/07 70.00 214893 5/22/07 935.1(1 214894 5/22/07 45,926.71 214895 5/22107 186.48 214896 5/22/01 4,224 00 214897 5/22/07 411.52 214898 5/22/07 50.96 214899 5/22/07 212.05 214900 5/22/07 804 214901 5/22/07 1,920 00 214902 5122/07 329 61 214903 5/22/07 529.47 214904 5/22/07 80.00 214905 5/22;07 193.30 214906 5122/07 186.00 214907 5/22107 1.729.42 ? I4908 5/22/07 59.566.20 214909 5/22'077 950.10 714910 5/22107 555.29 21491 1 50..2/07 14.902.28 214912 5-22/07 2.561.84 714913 5 22'07 178.92 214914 5.:'.2.07 841.30 714915 5122/07 2,514. HUERTA HUNTER'S NURSERY RY INC. HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. !AFC 1DEN11X INC.. INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS JACKSON JAS PACIFIC, INC. JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL. JODI L. DOUCF.I TE JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN KNOX COMPANY KUSTOM SIGNAI.S INC. LASER SAVER INC LEVY MAINTEX, INC. MAl'11IEW BENDER St CO INC MIRAMAR COLLEGE MULTI -BANK SERVICES LTD MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE EQUIP MX LOGIC, INC NAPA AUTO PARTS NATIONAL. INSl1TUTE FOR NATIVIDAD OAIRE ONI:. SOURCE DISTRIBUTORS PARTS PLUS Al IT()STORE 4713 PI'.RJRY FORD PORIIL.LO CONCRETE, INC. POWLRSTRIDE BAI II•.RY CO INC PRUI)I/N'1IAL. OVERALL SUPPLY REIMB FEE FOR AUTOMOTIVE TEST MOP 445719 POLYGALA SIIRUI3S MOP 445720 RB ROTOR PC/FC FIRE RESCUE REGISl7JUN1EL R. GOVERNMENT PURPOSES APRIL 2007 SERVICES RECORDS MGMNT REFLJNL) INCORRECT SSN PAID) BI.DG INSPECTOR FEES LIFT: INS MAY 2007 RFIMB/LCC SPRING CONFCE 2007 MOP 469277 BLACK BARK KAISER INS ACTIVE MAY 2007 KAISER RET INS MAY 2007 BLACK, NO TAMPER SWITCH BATTERY PACKS MOP 45725 M5200 CARTRIDGE REFI INI) PROOF OF NON -LIABILITY JANI'I'ORIAI. SUPPIJIiS NC COIF. ON DISC/CODE PRINT TRAINING -FIREFIGHTER RECRUITS TRADE SETTLING CI IARGLS E-BRAKE CABLE ANTI-SPA1v1 FILTER SVC FOR EMAIL MOP 4457.35 BRAKE SHOES LAPTOPS WTTII CVSA PROGRAM TIJUANA CONVIN1'1ON/NAT1V1DAD TRAIN TIIF "TRAINER CLASS RJ G MOP 467256 LAMP. SAFETY GLASSES MOP 464946 TOOLS MOP 1145703 LINKS MAY 17, 2007 PROGRESS PAYMENT MOP 1'67839 RA Ill/RY MOP 45742 TOWI/L BATH 214916 5/22/07 157.00 214917 5/22/07 257.74 214918 5/22/07 700.61 214919 5/22/07 410.00 214920 5/22/07 10.00 214921 5/22/07 38,765.31 214922 5/22/07 120.58 214923 5/22/07 80.00 214924 5/22/07 6,030.00 214925 5/22/07 11,475.70 214926 5/22/07 203.80 214927 5/22/07 295.47 214928 5/22/07 112,134.30 214929 5/22/07 3,756.06 214930 5/22/07 238.16 214931 5/22/07 347.25 214932 5/22/07 328.22 214933 5/22/07 39.00 214934 5/22/07 2,261.39 214935 5/22/07 440.19 214936 5/22/07 720.00 214937 5/22/07 198.54 214938 5/22/07 44.92 214939 5/22/07 441.00 214940 5/22/07 303.08 214941 5/22/07 5,990.00 214942 5/22/07 151.10 214943 5/22/07 1,050.00 214944 5/22/07 271.36 214945 5/22/07 645.73 214946 5/22/07 151.45 2149.17 5/22/07 793.12 214948 5/22/07 50.86 214949 5/22/07 465.84 RHODF, ISLAND NOVELLY RIGEI. PRODUCTS AND SERVICE. SAN DIEGO MIRAMAR COLLEGE SD FIREFIGIITERS REGIONAL SDAPSD S}1REr) FORCE SMART & FINAL SOLANA CENTER SOLUTIONS SAFETY SERVICES. INC S(:)IITHWES•T SIGNAL SERVICE, INC. SPECIALTY IAil ITING ST'ARTECH COMPUTERS STATE COMPENSATION INS FUND SWTEETWAF ER AUTHORITY TASER INTERNATIONA1„ INC. 1'LI'RA TECII ISG it Tk IF. LIGII1I 1O(1SE, INC'. TIII . STAR NEWS TROT ING U.S. HEALIIIWORKS U.S. HEALIIIWORKS UNDERGROUND SERV .ALERT UNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO. UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISIiING CO UNITED RENTALS US STERLING CAPITAI. CORP VAI,LEY INDUSTRIAL SPECIALTIES VCA MAIN ST ANIMAL HOSPITAL VISTA PAINT WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES WESTERN PUMP, INC WILLIAMS SHERIFF'S BADGE., COWBOY HATS DRILL BIT & DRILL ROD ADV TUITION COURSE-4 RECRUITS WELLNESS EXAM FOR EMPLOYEES SDA OF PSD 2007 MEMBERSHIP SHREDDING SERVICE MOP 45756 SUBSIST ENCES RECYCI.I.I) ITEMS PER DEPT CIrROSC)UFF.7_E, 5 GALLON PAIL. TRAFFIC SIGNAL/STREET LIGHTING LAMP BULBS MOP 61744 BLACK WIDESCREEN CLAIM: EXPERT & CONS111.TN SR VC FAC1LIIrES DIVISION WATER BI1.I,S FOR INV 04105558.3 TASER REPAIR DL.POSIrli1126 839 E 2N1) STREET MOP 1145726 LAMPS Al) FOR PLANNING REFUND INCORRECT SSN PAID MEDICAL SERVICES MEDICAL SERVICES UNDERGROUND SERVICE. ALERT CHARGES VTI. MAY 2007 ADVERTISING/RECRUIT & ADM CONCRETE TRAILER, DOUBLE AXEI. TRADE SETTLING CI IARGES MOP tt46453 DISPOSER, COUPLINGS K9 VET CARE. GRAFFITI PAINT CHEMICALS FOR MUNICIPAL POOL NOZZLE, 1-A LEADED/DIE.SEI. REFUND FOR PLAN C'IIECK Workers compensation checks 214950 5/22/07 157.29 21495I 5/22/07 353.44 214952 5/22/07 2,200.00 214953 5/22/07 33,860.1 214954 5/22/07 225.00 214955 5/22/07 72.95 214936 5/22/07 96,20 214957 5/22/07 69125 214958 5/22/07 489.32 214959 5/22/07 14,405.96 214960 5/22/07 172.40 214961 5/22/07 1,620.19 214962 5/22/07 7,508.06 214964 5/22/07 18,626.68 214963 5/22/07 225.00 214966 5/22/07 1,250.00 214967 5/22/07 94.43 214968 5/22/07 425.38 214969 5/22/07 130. 214970 5/22/07 140.00 214971 5/22/07 100.00 214972 5/22/07 136.00 214973 5/22/07 2,267.95 214974 5/22/07 750.00 214975 5/22/07 15624 214976 5/22/07 198.54 214977 5/22/07 412.79 214978 5.122/07 15,1.24 214979 5122/07 681.95 214980 5/22/07 724.08 214981 5/22/07 254.09 214982 5/22;'07 253.05 Total 1,705,888 20 4 13135 5/16/07 101.26 13136 5/16/07 205.12 13137 5/16/07 20.90 13138 5/16/07 71.45 13139 5/16107 88.17 13140 5/16/07 15.06 13141 5/16/07 99.78 13142 5/16/07 344.60 13143 5/16/07 125.00 13144 5/16/07 583.76 13145 511607 84.72 13146 5/16/07 143.91 13147 5/16/07 87.21 13148 5/16/07 202.68 13 149 5/16/07 190.83 13150 5/16/07 141.10 13151 5/16/07 131.78 13152 5/16/07 163.38 13153 5/16/07 292.50 13154 5/16/07 1,418.98 13155 5/16/07 3.266.38 13156 5/16/07 440.00 13157 5/16/07 374.00 13158 5/16/07 13.58 1 i 159 5/16/07 17.74 1.3160 5/16/07 389.00 13161 5/16/07 280.00 13162 5/16/07 5,280.00 13163 5/16/07 440.00 Tmal 15,012.89 Total 1,720,901.28 PAYROLL. Pad period Start Date F'nd Date. Check Date 303 04/24/07 05/07/07 05/16/07 TOTAL $779,757.58 5 6 :ETING DATE JuIy03, 2007 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 ITEM TITLE WARRANT REGISTER # 47 PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT D. Gallegos -Finance Finance EXPLANATION Tess E. Limfueco 6 l 9-336-4330 Ratification of Warrant Register # 47 per Government Section Code 37208. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement Not applicable. Approved By: Finance Dir ctor Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I recommend ratification of these warrants for a total of $ 176,055.74 BOARD / COMMISSION R COMMENtlTION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Warrant Register #47 2. Workers Comp Warrant Register dated 5/23/07 A•200 O) 99) Payee ACEDO ADAMSON POLICE PRODUCES ALLEN AT&T/MCI BCM CUSTOMER SERVICE. BOYI) C W REED JR CA PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT R (:HII.DREN'S IIOSPITAL. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT ASSOCIAT 3MPI1'I ER PROTECTION TECH., CORPORATE EXPRESS CPS HUMAN RESOI IRCE: SERVICES DAPPER TIRE COMPANY DEFRATIS DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE D1C:ERC1110 DOU(iI.AS E. BARNHART, INC DRED(;F. DURRA INK. EWERT, P1111.1.11' FF.DEX FROMI•:X PHOTO & STUDIO GCA I.ABIII.S GENESIS COATINGS, INC. AMII "1 ON City of National City WARRANT RECIS'J'FR # 47 5/29/2007 Description chk no chk date amount RETIREE HEALTI I BENEFIT .11FN'07 MINOR } QU1 P'1' PROTECTORS RETIREE HEALTH BFNEFIT" JUN'07 PI LONE 619 477 9738 5/13-6/12/07 FIVAC MAINTENANCE. RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT JUN'07 RETIREMENT 2000964-S90 JI1N'07 CA Pl. & DEVELOPMENT REPORT ('1111.1.) SEXUAL, ABUSE EXAM CLAIM: RAZO VS NATIONAL CITY COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MOP 4.5704 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOVFRNMI•:N'l"AL PURPOSES TIRES RETIREE FIF.AI.TTI 1.3LNEFIT JUN'07 FINGERPRINT APPLICATIONS RETIREE HEALTI I BENEFIT JUN'07 APRIL 2007 SERVICES RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT JLJN'07 MOP 46766 ENVELOPES RETIREE HEALTH BFNI":FFI'S JUN'07 FEL)EX TRANSPORTATION CHRGS MOP 67534 MINI (_'I)S LABELS GRAFFITI REMOVAL. C1-IEMICAI. RETIREE UFAI.TT 1 BENEFIT JUN'07 21498.3 5/29/07 160.00 214984 5/29/07 25,206.24 214985 5/29/07 125.00 214986 5/29/07 168.10 21498"i 5/29/07 150.00 214988 5129/07 145.00 214989 5/29/07 1,086.58 214990 5/29/07 259.00 214991 5i29/07 745.00 214992 S/29/07 890.50 214991 5/29/07 39,408.61 214994 .5/29/07 218.53 214995 5/29/07 730.25 214996 5/29/07 1,231.36 214997 5/29/07 120.00 214998 5/29/07 160.00 214999 5/29/07 70 00 215000 5/29/07 5,538.50 215001 5/29/07 250.00 215002 5/29/07 88.25 715003 5/29/07 160.00 215004 5/29/07 21.75 215005 5/ 29/07 42.96 215006 5/29/07 725 3 3 215007 5!29/07 354.58 215008 5/ 29/0 / 100 00 1 Payee IIODGES 1101,LOWAY HdL COREN & CONE I.M.P.A.C:. GOVERNMENT SVCS KIMBLI . KOLANDA LEXIS-NEXIS LIFE -ASSIST, INC. LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC. MATIENLO MCCABE MCDOWI:I.I, MEDINA MEDINA METRO FIRE EQUIPMENT METRO(:ALL MORE DIRECT MURRAY MYERS N C CIIAMBER OF COMMERCE NAPA AUTO PARTS NEXUS INT EGRATED SOLUTIONS NOSAL, WIL,LIAM A. ONE. SOUR(:F. DISTRIBUTORS P G AUTO PARTS PARTS PLUS Al JTOSTORE 1%71 PAUU City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 47 5/29/2007 Description MILEAGE REIMB/BRENDA IIODGES RETIREE IlEAI.TH BENEFIT JUN'07 APR-JUN'07 CONTR SRVC PROP FAX CAI. CARD - COMM SVCS RETIREE HEAL:F!I BENEFIT JUN'07 RETIREE HEAL"111 BENEFIT JUN'07 ONLINE CHRGS FOR APR 2007 THERMOMETER & SIIPPLIES MAINTENANCE KIT RETIREE HEALTT1 BENEFIT JUN'07 RETIREE HEAL: F11 BENEFIT JUN'07 RETIREMENT GEORGE CAMERON TRAVEL EXP\ICS TRAIN SEMINAR REIMB/OVERNIGIIT POSTAGE SERVICE - FUSIBLE 1.FNKS METROCALL PAGING SVC INV 1268411 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT JUN'07 RETIREE HEA►:111 BENEFIT JUN'07 CITY ENHANCEMENT FUND MAY'07 MOP 445735 (_T IAIN NEC AND SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE. RETIREMENT" SL{TTI.EMENT JUN'07 MOP 4 67256 SERVICE. CHARGES Al :I ERNATOR. RECONDITIONED MOP 464946 AUTO-POLY-V BEHF, RETIREE FIEALT II BENEFIT JUN'07 chk no chk date amount 215009 5/29/07 124.40 215010 5/29/07 150.00 215011 5/29/07 2_400.00 215012 5'29/07 251.63 215013 5.29./07 300.00 215014 5129/07 135.00 215015 5/29/07 .378.29 215016 5129/07 919.67 21501 "i 5.29/07 192.43 215018 5/29/07 100.00 215019 529i07 280.00 215020 5/79/07 35.0 215021 5.'29/07 60.85 215022 529/07 22.76 215023 5/29/07 358.99 2.15024 5/29/07 72.38 215025 5;29/0'7 4,080 30 215026 5%29,07 150.00 215027 5/29/07 140.00 215028 5/29/07 3,750.00 215029 5 29:07 21 1.1.1 215030 5/29/01 524.00 215031 5,29,0i 1.027.85 715032 5.'79, 17 6 8� )1503.3 5 79/01 830.17 215034 5'29/07 .11.64 215035 5)29:07 34(1 Payee PERRY FORD POTTER PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS INC. PRUDENTIAL OVI•:RAI.I. SUPPLY RAY REGIONAI, COMMUNICATIONS SY RI JIZ SD COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSN SHORT, CRAIC; SMART & FLNAI. SPARKLETTS TARTECH COMPUTERS SWEETWATER AUTIIORITY tJ'SAGAIN 3000 LC UNITED PARCEL SERVICE VERIZON WIRELESS - SI) VERIZON WIRELESS - SD City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 47 5/29/2007 Description MOP #45703 AUTO PARTS RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT JUN'07 BUSINESS LICENSE FORMS MOP #45742 FACILITIES RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT JUN'07 RCS RADIO MAINTENANCE RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT JUN'07 DINNER REST{RVATION/JUNILL R. RETIREE HEALTH BENEFIT JUN'07 MOP 45756 MISCELLANLOUS WATER/MAYOR & C COUNCIL OFFCE MOP 61744 LINKSYS ACCESS POINT STREET DIVISION WATER BILLS BUSINESS LICENSE KLFUND UPS SHIPMENT Q-PT TONES FOR I'1)/C'EI.I. PHONE SVC CEI.1. PI IONE SVC 3/26-4/25/07 VERSATILE INFORMATION PRODUC MINOR EQIJIPMENT VISTA PAINT MOP 68834 PAINT SIJPPLIES WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY 7TFTLOW, DAVID 7IONS BANK SI `N TRI'ST MOP 45763 ELECTRIC SUPPLIES RETIREE 11EALTH BENEFIT JIJN'07 8TH LEASE PMT-800 MIIZ EQPMTS NEV' FIRE. TRIJCKi:I LEASE PMT#39 chk no chk date amount 215036 5/29/07 139.40 215037 5/29/07 150.00 215038 5/29/07 929.24 215039 5/29/07 285.96 215040 5/29/07 190.00 215041 5/29/07 8,930.50 215042 5/29/07 :110.00 215043 5/29/07 47.00 215044 5/29/07 300.00 215045 5/29/07 15.18 215046 5/29/07 28.26 21504"/ 5129/07 75.78 215048 5/29/07 669.68 215049 5/29/07 65.00 21.5050 5/29/07 60.94 215051 5/29/07 2,561.5(1 215052 5/29/07 75.64 215053 5/29/07 1,263.13 215054 5/29/07 38.00 215055 5/29/07 183.85 215056 5/29/07 150.00 215057 5/29/07 48,678.25 215058 5/29/07 5.009.63 Workers compensation checks Total S 164,700.13 13164 23101 242.;8 13165 5/2.3/07 111328 l City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 47 5/29/2007 Payee Description chk no chk date amount 13166 5/23/07 142.82 13167 5/23/07 501.55 13168 5/23/07 7,229.26 13169 5/23/07 199.81 13170 5/23/07 378.65 13171 5/23/07 400.00 13172 5/23/07 652.36 13173 5/23/07 400.00 13174 5/23/07 400.00 13175 5/23/07 460.00 13176 5/23/07 32.30 13177 503/07 198.2 Total $ 11,355.61 Grand Total 176,055.74 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 ITEM TITLE A resolution of the City Council approving the Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project. PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Patricia Beard, Redeye opment Manager Community Development Commission (ext 4255) EXPLANATION The Community Development Commission ("CDC") is proposing an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project ("2007 Amendment") to: extend the CDC's authority to acquire property through eminent domain for certain commercial and industrial zoned properties until 2019, change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes to include all residential land uses, to modify the redevelopment plan text as it pertains to redevelopment actions and permitted land uses, and revise the Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvement Projects exhibit. The City Council and the CDC held a joint public hearing on June 19, 2007, where testimony was provided on the 2007 Amendment and Negative Declaration. Since the Public Hearing testimony did not question the process the CDC used to conduct an environmental review of the 2007 Amendment, staff is recommending that the City Council, as the lead agency, certify the Negative Declaration prior to considering the final actions for the 2007 Amendment. Environmental Review A negative declaration has been prepared in accordance with The Califomia Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). Staff is submitting the Negative Declaration to the City Council for their consideration and approval. Financial Statement Staff recommendation will have no affect on the City's General Fund. However, if the 2007 Amendment is adopted by the City Council, a fee of $1,800 shall be paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Diego to file a notice of determination. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Background Report 2. City Council Resolution No._ -Negative Declaration as Attachment A to the resolution Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 156 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 2007 AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City ("City Council") and the Community Development Commission of the City of National City ("CDC") did duly pass and adopt a Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project ("Plan"); and WHEREAS, the CDC has formulated an amendment to the Plan ("2007 Amendment") which would: • Extend the existing time limit, not to exceed 12 years from the adoption of the amendment of the Plan, for commencement of eminent domain proceedings to acquire, as a last resort, vacant property (as defined in National City Municipal Code Section 7.06.20), and all commercial and industrial zoned properties in those areas that are currently subject to eminent domain authority within the National City Redevelopment Project Area; • Add a provision to allow the CDC, if it makes certain findings, to pay all or part of the value of the land and the costs of the installation and construction of any publicly -owned building, facility, structure or other improvement within or without the Project Area pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33445; • Modify Section VII (c) of the Redevelopment Plan to allow used auto and truck sales when part of a new vehicle dealership and located on land within the Transportation Center District, as defined in the Plan; • Change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D of the Redevelopment Plan) to include all residential land uses; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration has been prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et. seq.) on the proposed 2007 Amendment ("Negative Declaration") in the form attached hereto as Attachment "A"; and WHEREAS, a notice of the availability of the Negative Declaration for public review and comment was published on June 8, 2007 in the San Diego Union -Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of National City; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2007, the CDC and City Council held a joint public hearing on the proposed 2007 Amendment and Negative Declaration, and received and considered all evidence and testimony pertaining thereto; and WHEREAS, it is mandatory that the City Council certify its consideration of and approve the Negative Declaration prior to acting on an ordinance to adopt the 2007 Amendment. Resolution No. 2007 — 156 July 3, 2007 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby finds and determines that there is not substantial evidence that the proposed 2007 Amendment will have a significant effect on the environment, and that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council based upon the whole record of the Negative Declaration, including the Initial Study contained therein, any comments received, and evidence and testimony received at the Joint Public Hearing on the Negative Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration prepared for the 2007 Amendment and hereby approves the Negative Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is authorized to file, in cooperation with the Secretary of the Community Development Commission, a Joint Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego following adoption by the City Council of the ordinance adopting the 2007 Amendment. PASSED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 2007. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Daila, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney Background Report Background: The City Council of the City of National City ("City Council") and the Community Development Commission ("CDC") held a joint public hearing on the 2007 Amendment on June 19, 2007. CDC staff and consultants presented the reasons for the proposed 2007 Amendment, and the City Council/CDC received testimony regarding the 2007 Amendment and the Negative Declaration for the 2007 Amendment ("Negative Declaration"). CDC staff was then directed to prepare written responses to written objections and to present them at the July 3, 2007, joint meeting. In order to provide staff with adequate time to prepare the written responses, City Council consideration of the written responses will be scheduled for the July 10,,2007, joint meeting of the City Council and CDC. At this meeting the City Council and the CDC will consider resolutions approving the Negative Declaration. The CDC has followed the appropriate environmental review process and the City Council and the CDC are to consider the certification of the Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Amendment prior to adopting an ordinance approving the 2007 Amendment. The Negative Declaration, along with the Initial Study, was prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Califomia Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et. seq.). The Negative Declaration evaluated the potential environmental impacts and found that the proposed 2007 Amendment would not present any adverse environmental impacts. As site specific implementation projects are considered, additional. environmental review will be conducted. This review will evaluate the anticipated environmental impacts associated with the project proposal. In accordance with CEQA provisions, the Negative Declaration was available for public review and comment for a period of twenty (20) days. The review period commenced on June 7, 2007, and ended on June 27, 2007. A notice of intent to adopt the Negative Declaration and its availability for public review and comment was published on June 8, 2007, in the San Diego Union -Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of National City. In addition, an opportunity for public testimony on the Negative Declaration was provided at the June 19, 2007, joint public hearing. The Negative Declaration was made available to the CDC and the City Council prior to the joint public hearing as an attachment to the Report to City Council and is available now as Attachment A to City Council Resolution No. By adopting the attached resolution, the City Council is approving the Negative Declaration for the 2007 Amendment and authorizing the City Clerk, in cooperation with Secretary of the CDC, to file a Joint Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego following the adoption of an ordinance approving the 2007 Amendment. Community Development Commission of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950-3312 Telephone (619) 336-4250 Fax (619) 336-4286 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AC'l' Redevelopment Plan Amendment 2007 - Negative Declaration A. INTRODUCTION The Community Development Commission of the City of National City (the "CDC") prepared a Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment to extend the authority to use eminent domain. The CDC proposes to extend the CI)C's existing authority to acquire property, as a last resort, through eminent domain to vacant property (as defined in the National City Municipal Code Section 7.06.20), and all commercial and industrial zoned properties in those areas which are currently subject to eminent domain authority within the National City Redevelopment Project Area. The current exemption for single family residences would be expanded so that all housing uses, whether single-family or multi -family, are specifically excluded from the use of eminent domain. The Commission currently has the authority to acquire property through eminent domain until July.18, 2007 in the following areas: • Properties located immediately east and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and the south City limits. • Properties located immediately west and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and State Route 54. • Properties located immediately west and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately south and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately north and south and adjacent to 8th Street, between Interstate 5 and "D" Avenue. • Properties west of Interstate 5, excepting the San Diego Unified Port District property. • Specific properties located immediately southwest of the intersection of Plaza Boulevard and Ilighland Avenue. This amendment will extend the Commission's authority to acquire property through eminent domain within these areas until 2019. The 2007 Amendment also includes the addition and modification of redevelopment plan text as it pertains to redevelopment actions and uses permitted in the project area. As proposed the amendment would add a provision for the CDC to pay all or part of the value of the land and the cost of the installation and construction of any publicly owned building, facility, structure, or other improvement within or without the Project Area pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445. The 2007 Amendment would modify Section VII (c) of the Redevelopment Plan, thus allowing for used auto and truck sales when part of a new vehicle dealership and located on land within the Transportation Center district. The 2007 Amendment will also change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, as well as revising Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects". No other changes to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project are included in this amendment. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration Page 1 Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain 3 The Negative Declaration for the 2007 Amendment evaluated the potential environmental impacts that could occur with making the proposed amendments to the existing Redevelopment Plan. The Negative Declaration was mailed for a 20-day public review period beginning June 7, 2007 and is scheduled to end on June 27, 2007. Comments on the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment Negative Declaration should be submitted during this public review period. The Negative Declaration will he considered for approval July 3, 2007. The cornmercial and industrial properties within the Project Area that are now subject to the use of eminent domain arc shown on the attached map. The change to the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment to extend the eminent domain time limit in the existing project area, revising F.xhibii D to exclude all residential land uses, revising the transportation center section and revising Exhibit C — public facilities and infrastructure is now referred to as the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment, which reflects the stated change. B. CEQA PROVISIONS As stated above, a Negative Declaration was prepared for the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines). The revision to the 2007 Amendment is now reflected by the 2007 Amendment, which did not cause or generate any significant effects. C. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Negative Declaration did not identify any significant or adverse environmental impacts associated with the extension of the eminent domain time limit in the existing project area, revising Exhibit D to exclude all residential land uses, revising the transportation center section and revising Exhibit C — public facilities and infrastructure. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(c)(2), the Negative Declaration is adequate in its analysis of the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration Page 2 Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain 1/ APPENDICES ATTAC;IINIENT 2 — NEGATIVE DECLARATION See attached Negative Declaration following this page. RSG Page 34 Attachment 2 Community Development Commission of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National ('ity, California 91950-3312 Telephone (619) 336-4250 Fax (619) 336-4286 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Redevelopment Plan Amendment 2007 - Negative Declaration A. INTRODUCTION The Community Development Commission of the City of National City (the "CDC") prepared a Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment to extend the authority to use eminent domain. The CDC proposes to extend the CDC's existing authority to acquire property, as a last resort, through eminent domain to vacant property (as defined in the National City Municipal Codc Section 7.06.20), and all commercial and industrial zoned properties in those areas which are currently subject to eminent domain authority within the National City Redevelopment Project Area. The current exemption for single family residences would be expanded so that all housing uses, whether single-family or multi -family, are specifically excluded from the use of eminent domain. The Commission currently has the authority to acquire property through eminent domain until July 18, 2007 in the following areas: • Properties located immediately cast and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and the south City limits. • . Properties located immediately west and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and State Route 54. • Properties located immediately west and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately south and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately north and south and adjacent to 8th Street, between Interstate 5 and "D" Avenue. • Properties west of Interstate 5, excepting the San Diego Unified Port District property. • Specific properties located immediately southwest of the intersection of Plaza Boulevard and Highland Avenue. This amendment will extend the Commission's authority to acquire property through eminent domain within these areas until 2019. The 2007 Amendment also includes the addition and modification of redevelopment plan text as it pertains to redevelopment actions and uses permitted in the project area. As proposed the amendment would add a provision for the CDC to pay all or part of the value of the land and the cost of the installation and construction of any publicly owned building, facility, structure, or other improvement within or without the Project Area pursuant to Health and Safety Codc Section 33445. The 2007 Amendment would modify Section VII (c) of the Redevelopment Plan, thus allowing for used auto and truck sales when part of a new vehicle dealership and located on land within the "Transportation Center district. The 2007 Amendment will also change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, as well as revising Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects". No other changes to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project are included in this amendment. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration Page 1 Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain The Negative Declaration for the 2007 Amendment evaluated the potential environmental impacts that could occur with making the proposed amendments to the existing Redevelopinent Plan. The Negative Declaration was mailed for a 20-day public review period beginning June 7, 2007 and is scheduled to end on June 27, 2007. Comments on the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment Negative Declaration should be submitted during this public review period. The Negative Declaration will be considered for approval July 3, 2007. The commercial and industrial properties within the Project Area that are now subject to the use of eminent domain are shown on the attached map. The change to the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment to extend the eminent domain time limit in the existing project area, revising Exhibit D to exclude all residential .land uscs, revising the transportation center section and revising Exhibit C — public facilities and infrastructure is now referred to as the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment, which reflects the stated change. B. CEQA PROVISIONS As stated above, a Negative Declaration was prepared for the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines). The revision to the 2007 Amendment is now reflected by the 2007 Amendment, which did not cause or generate any significant effects. C. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Negative Declaration did not identify any significant or adverse environmental impacts associated with the extension of the eminent domain time limit in the existing project area, revising Exhibit D to exclude all residential land uses, revising the transportation center section and revising Exhibit C — public facilities and infrastructure. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(c)(2), the Negative Declaration is adequate in its analysis of the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment. Community Development Commission of National City - Negative Declaration Page 2 Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain California Environmental Quality Act Initial Study Project Title and File No.: Lead Agency: Project Contact: Project Sponsor: Project Location: Community Development Commission of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 Telephone (619) 336-4250 Fax (619) 336-4286 Redevelopment Plan 2007 Amendment — Extend the eminent domain time limit in the existing project area, revising Exhibit D to exclude all residential land uses, revising the transportation center section and revising Exhibit C — public facilities and infrastructure. Community Development Commission of the City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-3312 (619) 336-4250 Patricia Beard Community Development Commission of the City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-3312 (619) 336-4250 Community Development Commission of the City of Nati 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-3312 (619) 336-4250 The project includes the redevelopment project areas west of • as shown in Figure 1. Project Description: The Community Development Commission of the City of National City is processing an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project. As proposed, the amendment will extend the Commission's existing authority to acquire property, as a last resort, through eminent domain to vacant property (as defined in the National City Municipal Code Section 7.06.20), and all commercial and industrial zoned properties in those areas which are currently subject to eminent domain authority within the National City Redevelopment Project Area. The current exemption for single family residences would be expanded so that all housing uses, whether single-family or multi -family, are specifically excluded from the use of eminent domain. The Commission currently has the authority to acquire property through eminent domain until July 18, 2007 in the following areas: • Properties located immediately east and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and the south City limits. • Properties located immediately west and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and State Route 54. • Properties located immediately west and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately south and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately north and south and adjacent to 8th Street, between Interstate 5 and "D" Avenue. • Properties west of Interstate 5, excepting the San Diego Unified Port District property. • Specific properties located immediately southwest of the intersection of Plaza Boulevard and Highland Avenue. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 1 This amendment will extend the Commission's authority to acquire property through eminent domain within these areas until 2019. The 2007 Amendment also includes the addition and modification of redevelopment plan text as it pertains to redevelopment actions and uses permitted in the project area. As proposed the amendment would add a provision for the CDC to pay all or part of the value of the land and the cost of the installation and construction of any publicly owned building, facility, structure, or other improvement within or without the Project Area pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445. The 2007 Amendment would modify Section VII (c) of the Redevelopment Plan, thus allowing for used auto and truck sales when part of a new vehicle dealership and located on land within the Transportation Center district. The 2007 Amendment will also change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, as well as revising Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects". No other changes to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project are included in this amendment. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 2 Figure 1 Project Area Map Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 3 Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g. permits, financing approval, participation agreement): The Community Development Commission of the City of National City is the only agency whose approval is required for this proposed redevelopment plan amendment. The proposed 2007 Amendment does not directly propose any projects, public or private at this time. Indirectly, however development could occur in the project area in the future as a result of the use of eminent domain for a specific project. It is speculative at this time to identify or determine with any certainty projects that may occur in the future and the environmental impacts, if any that would be associated with the project. The Community Development Commission and/or the City of National City would conduct the appropriate environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act at the time a project is formally submitted to either agency for approval. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Public Services Agriculture Resources ❑ Hydrology/Water Quality ❑ Recreation n Air Quality ❑ Land Use/Planning I Transportation/Traffic Biological Resources ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Noise Geology/Soils ❑ Population/Housing ❑ Utilities/Service Systems El Mandatory Findings DETERMINATION: On the basis of this evaluation: ® I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant impact on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION would be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant impact on the environment, there would not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION would be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT is required. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on an earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 4 ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects 1) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and 2) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Prepared by: Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. Under contract with the Community Development Commission Reviewed by: Patricia Beard, Project Manager Department Representative Date: May 3, 2007 Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 5 Environmental Factors I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Commission, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which due to their location or nature could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use? III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants for which the project region is non - attainment under applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact El El n Li n n ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Have substantial adverse effects, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified ❑ n Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain n n ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ May 2007 Page 6 Environmental Factors as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact n n ❑ n n n n ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ May 2007 Page 7 Environmental Factors on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on -or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or the site? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact n ❑ ❑ ❑ n VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ n ■ a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials site compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65692.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or environment? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people working or residing in the project area? f) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? g) Create a significant hazard to the public or the n Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain ■ ■ ■ ■ n ■ n ■ n ■ May 2007 Page 8 Environmental Factors environment through the presence or release of methane gas? Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact VIH. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate of amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche or mudflow? IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of agencies with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to general plan, specific plan, or development code) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ n r U u Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain P u I n n ■ ■ ■ ■ L.J ■ ■ May 2007 Page 9 Environmental Factors c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact n ❑ ❑ ❑ a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Exposure of person to or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels? ❑ ❑ ❑ c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ ❑ d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? ❑ ❑ ❑ e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? ❑ ❑ ❑ XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? n Li ❑ c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ n ❑ ■ ■ ■ Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain ■ May 2007 Page 10 Environmental Factors Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the need for, or provision of, new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? ii) Police protection? iii) Schools? iv) Parks? v) Other public facilities? XIV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management Commission for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing u n n n n ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ n n n ■ Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain El u ❑ • ❑ ■ ❑ • ❑ • ❑ ■ El ■ ■ May 2007 Page 11 Environmental Factors Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVII. ENERGY: Would the project: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ P1 ❑ ❑ a) Result in an adverse impact on local and regional energy supplies, including base or peak period demands, regardless of the presence of a would -serve letter from the appropriate energy provider? _ n ❑ b) Conflict with existing energy standards? L c) Would the project reduce solar access or opportunities for passive heating and cooling on the site or nearby property? XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain ■ May 2007 Page 12 Environmental Factors Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less than Significant Mitigation Significant Impact Incorporated Impact No Impact the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) c) Does the project have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? ❑ ❑ ❑ Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain ■ May 2007 Page 13 Explanation of Checklist Responses I. AESTHETICS: Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. The 2007 Amendment indirectly could encourage development in the redevelopment project area. The National City General Plan does not identify any scenic vistas in the city; therefore, future development in the project area due indirectly to the adoption of the 2007 Amendment would not impact any scenic vista. The 2007 Amendment would not have any scenic vista impacts. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could damage scenic resources within a state scenic highway. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development in the redevelopment project. A section of National City Boulevard in the Mile of Cars section of National City is a state scenic highway. The city would require all development along this portion of National City Boulevard to comply with the appropriate state and city guidelines to protect a state scenic highway. Development that indirectly occurs in any other section of the project area would not damage or impact any trees, rocks, or historic buildings since none of these features exist. The 2007 Amendment would not have any significant scenic resource impacts. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the redevelopment project area and the surroundings because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the project area. Subsequent development in the project area due indirectly to the use of eminent domain as allowed by the 2007 Amendment could impact the existing visual character of a specific site and its surroundings. The Community Development Commission and/or City of National City would conduct subsequent environmental analysis pursuant to and in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) at the time projects are submitted for approval to determine if a project would have an impact on the visual character or quality of a Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 14 specific site and its surroundings. If the city determines a project could impact the visual character of a site and/or its surroundings, changes or modifications would be required. The city adopted the National. City Design Guidelines to assure that development is in harmony with the character and quality of the environment that the city finds desirable to foster. The purpose of the National City Design Guidelines Manual is to provide a "guide" to what the city considers appropriate, quality design, which promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the community. The Guidelines articulate the city's goals and basic design philosophy for quality development within the city limits and provide the framework for the design review process. The Guidelines are not specifications nor do they preclude alternatives or restrict imagination. Rather, they are the city's preferences and provide examples of what the city considers acceptable.) The Guidelines supplement the development standards and regulations contained in the National City Land Use Code and are applicable in accordance with the requirements for site plan review under Chapter 18.128 of the Code. The Community Development Commission and/or the city would require changes to projects to ensure that they do not degrade the visual character of a specific site or its surroundings. All projects would be required to meet the applicable guidelines in the National City Design Guidelines based on the project proposed. The 2007 Amendment would not degrade the visual character of the project area. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare that would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not create any new sources of substantial light or glare and affect day or nighttime views in the redevelopment project area because development is not proposed directly in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could create new sources of light or glare. Indirectly, the extension of the use of eminent domain could result in development in the project area. Depending upon the type and density of development, light and/or glare could impact surrounding land uses. Nighttime lighting including safety and security lights, interior building lights, automobile headlights, etc. could impact surrounding development. Glare from windows and metal surfaces could also impact adjacent development. The Community Development Commission and/or the city would review all projects for potential light and glare impacts and require changes and modifications when necessary to reduce light and glare impacts. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Commission, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not have a substantial adverse effect on prime farmlands because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could impact farmland or agricultural land. There are no agricultural operations or prime farmland in the project area. Therefore, future development would not impact agricultural resources or operations and would not convert prime farmland, unique farmland or farmland of statewide importance to non-agricultural use since none exist. 1 City of National City Design Guidelines, February 1991, Amended by Resolution No. 96-19, February 6, 1996, page I-1. Community Development Commission of National City - Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 15 b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of farmland, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. III. AIR QUALITY: Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not have a conflict or obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not directly propose any public or private development projects that would conflict with or obstruct implementation of applicable air quality plan(s). National City is located in the San Diego Air Pollution Control District. Indirectly, the extension of the use of eminent domain could encourage new development. Depending upon the type and density of development, project air emissions could impact and obstruct implementation of an applicable air quality plan. The Community Development Commission and/or the city would review all development projects for potential impacts to air quality plans and require project changes or modifications to ensure compliance. The 2007 Amendment would not directly impact the implementation of any air quality plans. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single- family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that would violate air quality standards or contribute to an existing projected air quality violation. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development in the project area. Depending upon the type and density of new development the project air emissions could violate an air quality standard or standards, or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The Community Development Commission and/or the city would review all future projects for potential violations to existing air quality standards such as exceeding air emission thresholds during either project construction or the life of the project. If a project is expected to violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation specific measures would be required to be incorporated into the project to reduce air emissions in compliance with air quality standards in force at that time. The 2007 Amendment would not violate air quality standards or contribute to an existing air quality violation, including ozone. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutants for which the project region is non -attainment under applicable federal or state ambient air quality standards (including releasing emissions that exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not result in a cumulative considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant for which the region is non -attainment because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 16 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would result in a cumulatively considerable increase of criteria pollutants for which the region is non -attainment. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development if eminent domain is used to acquire property. Depending upon the type and density of development that is constructed, the 2007 Amendment could cumulatively add criteria pollutants that are non -attainment in the San Diego Air Pollution Control District, including ozone. The air emissions generated by future development due indirectly to the 2007 Amendment could contribute emissions to the air basin that are cumulative and further non -attainment of ozone. The Community Development Commission and/or city would review all projects for potential impacts to criteria pollutants and require the use of all applicable pollution control measures as applicable to control emissions to acceptable levels. The 2007 Amendment would not directly impact criteria pollutants for which the San Diego Air Pollution Control District is non -attainment, including ozone. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development if eminent domain is used to acquire property in the project area. Depending upon the type and density of development the air emissions generated by a project could expose sensitive receptors to pollutant concentrations. The Community Development Commission and/or city would evaluate all projects for potential impacts to sensitive receptors at the time projects are submitted for approval. If it is determined that a project could expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, the Community Development Commission and/or city would require changes to reduce the impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not directly impact sensitive receptors by exposing them to substantial pollutant concentrations. e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not create objectionable odors that could affect people because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could create objectionable odors. The 2007 Amendment could indirectly result in development if eminent domain is used to acquire property. Depending upon the type and density of development odors could be generated and affect people in close proximity to the site. The Community Development Commission and/or the city would evaluate all projects for odor impacts to people that either live or work in close proximity at the time they are submitted for approval. If it is determined that a project could generate odors that affect a substantial number of people the Community Development Commission and/or city would require changes to reduce or eliminate odor impacts accordingly. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the project: Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 17 a) Have substantial adverse effects, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies or regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications to any species identified as a candidate sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that would impact plant or wildlife species. The property in the project area is most developed and urbanized. Due to the lack of suitable habitat there are not any candidate plant or wildlife species that would be impacted if development occurs indirectly due to the 2007 Amendment. There are no habitat conservation plans associated with any property in the project area. The 2007 Amendment would not have any biological resource impacts directly or indirectly because there are no biological resources in the project area that can be impacted. b) Have substantial adverse effects on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. c) Have substantial adverse effects on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would adversely impact a historical resource. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 18 Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development in the project area if eminent domain is used to acquire property and buildings are either historical or candidates as historical buildings. The Community Development Commission and/or city would evaluate all projects for potential historical resource impacts at the time development plans are submitted for approval. If it is determined that a historical resource could be impacted, the Community Development Commission and/or city would require measures to ensure the protection of the resource in compliance with the law. If resources suspected of being historically significant were uncovered during construction the city would evaluate the resources and protect it in compliance with CEQA Guideline § 15064.5, as applicable. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource as defined in §15064.5? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could cause adversely impact an archaeological resource. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development if eminent domain is used to acquire property. The National City General Plan does not identify any archaeological resources within the project area that would be impacted by future development. If archaeological resources, or artifacts of historical importance are uncovered during construction all construction activity shall cease and the city shall be notified immediately. The city would take the lead to determine whether or not the resources are significant and need to be protected in compliance with CEQA Guideline § 15064.5. The 2007 Amendment would not impact archaeological resources. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resources or unique geologic feature? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not destroy a unique paleontological resources or unique geologic feature because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that would destroy a unique paleontological resources or unique geologic feature. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development in the project area if eminent domain is used to acquire property. The National City General Plan does not identify any paleontological resources in the city, including the project area. The 2007 Amendment would not impact paleontological resources. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could disturb human remains. Community Development Commission of National City - Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 19 Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development if eminent domain is used to acquire property. There are no known buried human remains or formal cemeteries in the project area. Therefore, the 2007 Amendment would not impact human remains, including those within or outside formal cemeteries. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS: Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault zoning map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.) No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not cause a rupture of a known earthquake fault because development is not directly proposed with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Conunission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose any public or private development projects that could rupture or be impacted by an earthquake fault. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development if eminent domain is used to acquire property. Based on information in the National City General Plan and the California Geological Survey there are no known active faults in the city. However, there are several faults outside the city that could impact development in the project area. The Sweetwater Fault extends along the eastern edge of National City, but is considered to be inactive. The potential for movement on the nearby active La Nacion and Rose Canyon faults, located outside National City, could have devastating effects to development in National City as well as other areas in San Diego County. The region is also prone to earthquakes that could occur on more distant faults, such as the Elsinore, San Clemente, San Jacinto and San Andreas, and suitable precautions should be practiced2. The city must approve the building plans before the construction of any projects can occur. As part of the building plan permit process all projects would be required to incorporate all applicable measures in the Uniform Building Code to protect people and structures from the rupture of earthquake faults. The city could require the submittal of a geotechnical study to identify the geology of the site along with the grading and building plans. The geotechnical study would state whether or not the site conditions can safely support the project or if corrective soil and geotechnical measures would be required for the project to be safely constructed. There is no information at this time to indicate that future projects developed in the project areas would be impacted to any greater level than other development in the city. The incorporation of all applicable earthquake safety features required by the Uniform Building Code and recommendations in any geotechnical report prepared for a project would reduce geologic impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not impact or be impacted by earthquake faults in the area or the region. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not cause strong seismic ground shaking because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain 2 City. of National City General Plan, approved September10, 1996, page 18. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 20 on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment and does not propose any public or private development projects that could cause or be impacted by strong seismic ground shaking. Indirectly, the 2007 Amendment could result in development if eminent domain is used to acquire property. Residents, employees, and buildings would not be exposed to any greater degree of ground shaking with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment than currently exists. All projects, independently of the use of eminent domain, must provide applicable earthquake construction measures and hardware as required by the Uniform Building Code to reduce ground -shaking impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not change the exposure of people and buildings to seismic ground shaking. iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not cause seismic -related ground failures, including liquefaction because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could cause ground -failure, such as liquefaction. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Depending upon the location a project could be impacted by liquefaction or other seismic - related ground failures. However, whether or not development is impacted by liquefaction or any other seismic -related ground failure is not dependent upon the use of eminent domain. The use of eminent domain to would not change the exposure of a project to liquefaction or any other type of ground failure. Geotechnical reports would be prepared for individual projects to determine if they would be exposed to seismic -related ground failures. If a site is subject to liquefaction or any other seismic -related ground failure, measures would be incorporated into the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer to mitigate the impact. The 2007 Amendment would not have any seismic -related ground failures, including liquefaction. iv) Landslides? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not cause any landslides or expose people or property to landslides because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could cause or be exposed to landslides. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development. There are no large hillside areas within or adjacent to the project areas that could impact development. Therefore, landslides would not impact development and the 2007 Amendment would not have any landslide impacts. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 21 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could cause or result in soil erosion or loss of topsoil. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Development of projects could result in soil erosion and/or the loss of topsoil if construction occurs during the winter months when rainfall typically occurs and proper measures to reduce soil erosion are not implemented and maintained throughout construction. Soil erosion can also occur during periods of high winds if proper soil erosion protection measures such as soil binders are not used. The incorporation of all applicable soil erosion prevention measures that are required by the city would minimize soil erosion impacts during periods of rainfall and high winds. The National City Building Department would identify the soil erosion protection measures that would be incorporated into projects to reduce soil erosion. The 2007 Amendment would not have any soil erosion or topsoil impacts. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not place development on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable or become unstable due to soil or seismic conditions because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could place development on unstable soil or geologic units and cause on or off -site ground failure. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development within the project area. Although the National City General Plan does not identify any geologic constraints, there could be specific sites with a high water table that could be impacted by liquefaction. A geotechnical report would be submitted to the city in conjunction with grading and building plans for each project to address whether or not unstable soil or geologic units, including liquefaction, would impact the project. If the project could be impacted by soil and/or geological conditions the geotechnical report would identify the measures that could be implemented to correct the condition for safe development. The 2007 Amendment would not cause unstable soil or geological conditions. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or the site? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not place development on expansive soil because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could place development on expansive soil. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development within the project area. Although the National City General Plan does not identify any expansive soil, there could be some isolated areas where expansive soil exists. A geotechnical report would be submitted to the city along with grading and building plans for each project to address whether or not the project would be impacted by expansive soil. If expansive soil Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 22 exists the geotechnical report would identify the measures that could be implemented to correct the condition to allow safe development. The 2007 Amendment would not impact or be impacted by expansive soil. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not require the use of septic tanks because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment and does not propose public or private development projects that would use septic tanks. The City of National City requires all development to connect to the public sewer system and does not allow the use of septic tanks. The 2007 Amendment would not change the requirement by the city for development to connect to the public sewer system. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could create a hazard to the public or the environment. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The development of projects could include the transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials, depending upon the project. The city would review all future projects for potential hazards and the projects that generate or use hazardous materials would be required by the city would require each project to meet all applicable laws and regulations for the use, storage, and transport of hazardous materials. Compliance with all applicable laws and regulations for the transport and use of hazardous materials would minimize hazards to the public and the environment to acceptable levels. The 2007 Amendment would not have any hazardous impacts. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a significant hazard to the public or environment? No Impact. There are no sites in the redevelopment project area that are listed as a hazardous material site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5. A search the California Department of Toxic Substances Control's database of hazardous material sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 yielded zero sites listed in the project area. Therefore, the 2007 Amendment would not have any direct or indirect impacts with regards to listed hazardous materials sites pursuant to Government Code 65962.5. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 23 e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people working or residing in the project area? No Impact. The redevelopment project area is not located within the boundary of an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. The closest airport to the project area is the San Diego International Airport, which is approximately seven miles northwest of National City. f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not impair implementation of, or physically interfere with, an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan. g) Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. All development would be required to provide emergency access that allows for safe and effective access routes for fire and police equipment and personnel as well as people leaving the site in the event of an emergency. The city would review all projects for safe emergency access to ensure that emergency access is provided. The 2007 Amendment would not have any emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan impacts. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the presence or release of methane gas? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the presence or release of methane gas because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could create a significant hazard to the public or the environment. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The general plan does not identify any areas in National City where methane gas exists and would impact development due to a release of methane gas. The city would not approve any development that knowingly releases methane gas and create a hazard. The city would review all projects at the time they are submitted for approval for potential hazards by methane gas and require project changes and modifications to eliminate the hazard. The 2007 Amendment would not create any hazards to the public or the environment through the presence or release of methane gas. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could violate water quality standards of waste discharge requirements. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 24 Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development, which could generate surface water and violate water quality standards. All projects that require grading and/or construction are required to install measures prior to the start of construction to protect the quality of surface water runoff. For those projects that are greater than one acre in size, the project developer would be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for review prior to the issuance of either a grading or building permit. The SWPPP would include Best Management Practices (BMP's) that would be installed prior to the start of construction and maintained throughout the construction to reduce soil erosion. The BMP's would be installed prior to the start of construction to reduce sediments and other materials from being carried off -site and discharged into the local storm drain system. Some BMP's would be maintained throughout the construction period while others would have to be maintained throughout the life of the project. The city would require the installation of BMP's as necessary to mitigate impacts to water quality in compliance with all applicable State and Federal water quality rules and regulations. The 2007 Amendment would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. An increase in development could interfere with groundwater recharge if new development results in a net decrease in permeable area for water to percolate into the ground. Although the project area is mostly developed, there are some undeveloped areas where rainfall can percolate into the soil. Development that reduces the amount of soil available for water percolation could impact the local aquifer. Due to the relatively small amount of undeveloped land in the project area a reduction in permeable land would not result in a significant impact to groundwater recharge. The city would review all development proposals for impacts to groundwater recharge at the time development plans are submitted for approval. The Sweetwater Authority provides water service to National City and obtains most of its water supply from the Colorado River. It does, however, obtain some of its water supply from local wells. Development that reduces the amount of permeable soil available for rainfall to recharge the local groundwater could impact the Sweetwater Authority's water supply. However, the 2007 Amendment itself would not impact groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner, which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of any property or result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with or as part of the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 25 Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could substantially alter existing drainage patterns. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. New construction could require the existing drainage pattern of some sites to be modified that could alter existing drainage patterns. The city would review the grading plans of projects for potential erosion and siltation impacts due to modifications or changes to the existing drainage patterns. If existing drainage patterns are altered that could result in substantial erosion or siltation impacts on or off the site the city would require changes and the incorporation of measures to reduce erosion impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not impact drainage patterns or cause substantial erosion or siltation impacts. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate of amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site? No Impact. Please see the response to c) above. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects the could create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. New construction could generate quantities of runoff that could exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. As stated in response a) above, all applicable projects would be required to install and maintain proper measures to reduce the amount of sediments and other potential sources of surface water pollution. The development of property that is currently vacant or underdeveloped could generate quantities of surface water runoff and impact the local or regional storm drain system. The generation of surface water beyond the capacity of the storm drain system could significantly impact the storm drain system. The city would review all projects to determine if the existing system has capacity to handle the surface water flows or if upgrades are required. The 2007 Amendment itself would not impact the capacity of existing or planned storm drain systems. f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. g) Place housing within a 100 year flood hazard area as mapped on a Federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could place housing in a 100-year flood hazard area. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 26 Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The 2007 Amendment specifically excludes residential development; therefore no housing would be placed in a flood hazard area indirectly by the adoption and implementation of the 2007 Amendment. h) Place within a 100 year flood hazard area structures that would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would place structures in a 100-year flood hazard area. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. There are areas located in a 100-year flood zone, thus it is possible that future development could be placed in a 100- year flood hazard. The city would review all development proposals for potential flood hazards and require proper protection from flooding for those structures constructed in a flood hazard area. The 2007 Amendment would not directly have any flood hazard impacts. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? No Impact. The project area is not located in a dam inundation area and there are no levees that could break and flood properties in the project areas. The 2007 Amendment would not expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding due to the failure of a levee or dam. j) Inundation by seiche or mudflow? No Impact. There are no large bodies of water either located within or adjacent to the project area that could impact a project due to a seiche. While there are a few areas in National City with hillsides, there are no areas that are known to have mudflows and could impact development. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could be inundated by a seiche or mudflow. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The 2007 Amendment would not expose people or property to inundation or impacts by a seiche because there are no large bodies of water that could impact development. The areas in National City where hillsides do exist are not large enough in area to have mudflows that could impact development. The 2007 Amendment would not impact any development due to inundation by a seiche or mudflow. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not physically divide an established community because development is not proposed in conjunction with or as part of the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could physically divide an established community. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 27 Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Future development must be consistent with and comply with the National City General Plan, which does not allow development to divide an established community. The proposed 2007 Amendments would not directly or indirectly divide an established community. b) Conflict with applicable land use plan, policy or regulation of agencies with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to general plan, specific plan, or development code) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigation an environmental effect? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not conflict with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations of agencies with jurisdiction over development in the project area because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could conflict with a land use plans, policies or regulations. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Future development could conflict with the land use adopted by the general plan, a specific plan or the city's development code. Future projects would be reviewed for consistency and compatibility with the adopted plans and codes and changes or revisions would be require if necessary to comply with the applicable plans and codes. The 2007 Amendment itself would not directly impact or conflict with any adopted land use plans or codes. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not conflict with a habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plans because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with that adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could conflict with habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans. The city does not have any adopted habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans. However, there are areas in close proximity to the project area with habitat and wildlife resources that are protected and development could impact the resources. The city would review projects for potential conflicts with these known wildlife resource areas and require measures to protect the resources when necessary. Since no development is directly proposed with the 2007 Amendment, no impacts due to conflicts with applicable habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans would occur. X. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that is of value to the region and the residents of the state. Community Development Commission of National City - Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 28 Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. There are no known mineral resources within the project area that are of value to the region or the state. Therefore, future development would not impact any mineral resources. The 2007 Amendment would not impact minerals of value to the region or the state. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. Please see the response to a) above. XI. NOISE: Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not exposure people to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could expose persons to or generate noise in excess of standards established by the National City General Plan. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Development could expose residents or employees to noise levels that exceed the city's noise ordinance or projects could generate noise levels that exceed the city's allowable noise levels. The city would review all development proposals for noise impacts and require changes or modifications accordingly to ensure compliance with the city's noise standards. The 2007 Amendment would not have any noise impacts by exposing people to levels that exceed the city's noise ordinance. b) Exposure of person to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not exposure people to or generate excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects and would not expose people to or generate excessive ground borne vibrations or noise levels. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Future development could expose people to ground vibrations and impact them. The city would review all development plans for potential ground borne vibrations and require project changes or modifications accordingly to reduce vibration impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not have any direct ground borne vibration impacts. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not cause a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 29 Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would result in a substantial permanent increase in the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Development could increase existing noise levels above existing levels and result in a substantial permanent increase in the ambient noise. The city would review development proposals potential for noise level increases that could substantially increase existing noise levels and impact residents or employees. If necessary, the city would require changes to reduce ambient noise levels impacts to acceptable levels. The 2007 Amendment would not directly result in a substantial permanent increase in the ambient noise level. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise levels above existing levels because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would cause a substantial temporary or periodic increase in the ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Future development could temporarily increase existing ambient noise levels above existing levels. Temporary or periodic noise increases due to the operation of construction equipment could occur during project construction and impact surrounding land uses. The city would review development proposals at the time they are submitted for approval for potential temporary or short-term noise level increases that could impact surrounding land uses and require changes to reduce noise impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not directly result in substantial temporary noise level increases. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. The project areas associated with the 2007 Amendment are not located in an adopted airport land use plan. The San Diego International Airport is the closest airport to the project areas and is located approximately seven miles northwest of National City. The project would not expose people to excessive noise levels at an airport. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. The project would not induce a substantial population growth directly because development is not proposed in conjunction with or as part of the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could induce substantial population growth. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Development could induce a substantial population growth depending upon the type of development, residential, commercial, industrial, etc. The city would review development proposals for population growth impacts at the Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 30 time plans are submitted for approval. If projects would induce substantial population increases the city would determine at that time if an increase would be substantial and the impact the growth could have on the environment. The 2007 Amendment would not have a substantial population growth impact since no development is proposed. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. The project would not displace a substantial number of houses requiring the construction of replacement housing elsewhere because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could displace existing housing. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development. The 2007 Amendment excludes using eminent domain for residential purposes. Therefore, the 2007 Amendment could not use eminent domain authority to acquire residential property resulting in the demolition of existing housing that would require the construction of replacement housing elsewhere. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? No Impact. Please see the response to b) above. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES: a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the need for, or provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: i) Fire protection? No Impact. The project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the need for, or provision of, new or physically altered fire protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service rations, response times, or other performance objectives because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could impact fire protection services. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Future development could increase the need for new fire stations and other facilities that could have a substantial adverse impact on fire protection services, including personnel and equipment. This increase demand could impact the fire departments ability to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives such as reviewing building plans, conducting fire inspections in buildings, etc. National City is preparing a Development Impact Fee study to calculate a fee that would be assessed for future development in National City. The fee would be used to pay for the cost of providing public services for new Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 31 development and includes fire protection. The study is scheduled to be completed in August of this year and would have to be approved by the City Council before it is effective. If approved, the Development Impact Fee would fund new and expanded public services and facilities such as fire protection to serve new development. The fee can be used to construct new fire protection facilities, expand existing fire facilities, purchase fire trucks, fire equipment, etc. The fee cannot be use for labor, payroll expenses, etc. The Development Impact Fee, if approved, would be applicable to all projects, including projects that may be developed in the redevelopment project area due indirectly by adoption of the proposed 2007 Amendment. Payment of the fee, if adopted, would mitigate incremental impacts on the fire department. The 2007 Amendment would not have any impacts to fire protection services since development is not proposed as part of 2007 Amendment. ii) Police protection? No Impact. The project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the need for, or provision of, new or physically altered police protection facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could impact police services. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Future development could increase the need for police protection services and facilities that could have a substantial adverse impact on police services, including personnel and equipment. This increase demand could impact the police department's ability to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives such as reviewing building plans. National City is preparing a Development Impact Fee study to calculate a fee that would be assessed for future development in National City. The fee would be used to pay for the cost of providing public services for new development, including police protection. The study is scheduled to be completed in August of this year and would have to be approved by the City Council before it is effective. If approved, the Development Impact Fee would fund new and expanded public services and facilities such as police protection. The fee can be used to construct new police facilities, expand existing facilities, purchase equipment, etc. The fee cannot be use for labor, payroll expenses, etc. The Development Impact Fee, if approved, would be applicable to all projects, including projects that may be developed in the redevelopment project area indirectly by adoption of the proposed 2007 Amendment. Payment of the fee, if adopted, would mitigate incremental impacts to the police department. The 2007 Amendment would not have any impacts to police services since development is not proposed as part of 2007 Amendment. iii) Schools? No Impact. The project would not impact schools because development is not proposed in conjunction with or as part of the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could impact schools. Indirectly, the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The proposed 2007 Amendment only allows the use of eminent domain for commercial and industrial land uses and not residential. Although commercial and industrial development does generate students, the generation rate is much lower than residential. The number of students that would be generated by commercial or industrial development would be minimal and is not anticipated to significantly impact the capacity of schools serving the Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 32 project area. The two school districts, National City School District and Sweetwater Union High School District that serve National City collect school impact fees from development as allowed by state law. The school impact fee is used by both school districts to provide classroom space for students. New commercial and industrial development would be required to pay school impact fees as applicable, which would be used to provide additional classroom space for students. The proposed 2007 Amendment would not impact area schools since development is not directly proposed at this time. iv) Parks? No Impact. The project would not impact city parks because development is not proposed in conjunction with or as part of the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could impact parks. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. New development could increase the need for additional parks and recreational facilities or increase the use of existing park facilities in National City. The city strives to maintain or expand the current (1996) ratio of park and open space land to population, which is 4% acres per 1000 residents (including local parks, public -owned wetlands, golf courses, and school recreational facilities). The 2007 Amendment only allows the use of eminent domain for commercial and industrial development and not residential. The 2007 Amendment would not indirectly result in the development of residential uses, which typically increases the population and generates the need for park and recreational facilities. While commercial and industrial development may incrementally increase the need for parks, that need would be minimal and is not expected to impact existing facilities. National City is preparing a Development Impact Fee study to calculate a fee that would be assessed for future development in National City. The fee would be used to pay for the cost of providing public services and parks. The study is scheduled to be completed in August of this year and would have to be approved by the City Council before it is effective. If approved, the Development Impact Fee would fund new and expanded public services and facilities such as park facilities to serve new development. The fee can be used to purchase parkland and provide park facilities. The fee cannot be use for labor, payroll expenses, etc. The Development Impact Fee, if approved, would be applicable to all projects, including projects developed in the project area. Payment of the fee, if adopted, would mitigate incremental impacts on park facilities. The 2007 Amendment would not have any impacts to parks since development is not proposed as part of 2007 Amendment. v) Other public facilities? No Impact. There are no additional public facilities that would be impacted by the 2007 Amendment. XIV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? No Impact. The project would not cause an increase in traffic that is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could increase traffic. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 33 Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. New development could increase traffic with a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on area roads, or congestion at intersections. Additional development could impact the street system in the project area as well as the street system outside the project area. National City is preparing a Development Impact Fee study to calculate a fee that would be assessed for future development in National City. The fee would be used to pay for the cost of providing public services for new development including the circulation system. The study is scheduled to be completed in August of this year and would have to be approved by the City Council before it is effective. If approved, the Development Impact Fee would fund new and expanded public services and facilities such as street improvement to serve new development. The fee can be used to widen streets, construct needed intersection improvements, purchase and install traffic signals, restripe roadways, etc. The fee cannot be use for labor, payroll expenses, etc. The Development Impact Fee, if approved, would be applicable to all projects, including projects developed in the project area. Payment of the fee, if adopted, would mitigate incremental impacts by development to circulation facilities throughout the project area as well as the city. The 2007 Amendment would not have any impacts to the circulation systems since development is not proposed as part of the 2007 Amendment. b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management commission for designated roads or highways? No Impact. The project would not exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion commission for designated roads or highways because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could exceed individually or cumulatively a level of service standard established by the county. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. New development could increase traffic, which could exceed the level of service standard for roads in National City. Depending upon the type and location of projects the traffic could significantly impact the circulation system so that service levels are unacceptable. The city would review all development projects for potential traffic and circulation impacts to roadways. When necessary to meet acceptable service levels, a project may be required to construct street improvements or provide other measures to ensure acceptable levels of service. The proposed 2007 Amendment would not exceed the level of service of any roads or highways because development is not proposed as part of the 2007 Amendment. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The San Diego International Airport is the closest airport to National City and is located approximately seven miles northwest of the city. The 2007 Amendment would not impact air traffic patterns at the San Diego International Airport or any other airport in the area. c) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The project would not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature or incompatible uses because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single- family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Proj ects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could substantially increase hazards due to design features. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 34 Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. New development could require new design features for traffic to flow properly, which could increase hazards and impact traffic and circulation. The city would review all future development proposals for potential impacts associated with street design, including sharp curves and roadway intersections that could impact traffic flow and safety. When necessary, the city would require project changes or modifications to provide safe circulation features, including curves and intersections. Because development is not proposed by the 2007 Amendment, no circulation impacts would occur. d) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. The project would not provide any inadequate emergency access because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not proposed public or private development projects. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The city along with the police and fire departments would review all development proposals for adequate emergency access. Projects would be required to provide suitable access for emergency vehicles. The proposed 2007 Amendment would not have any emergency access impacts because development is not proposed as part of the 2007 Amendment. e) Result in inadequate parking capacity? No Impact. The project would not result in any inadequate parking capacity because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could result in inadequate parking capacity. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The city would review development proposals to ensure that adequate parking capacity is provided in compliance with the city's parking code. Since development is not proposed as part of the 2007 Amendment the project would not have any parking capacity impacts. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? No Impact. The project would not conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. The city has adopted policies requiring projects to provide alternative forms of transportation, including bus turnouts and bicycle racks when applicable. The city would review development proposals to ensure that bus turnouts and/or bicycle racks are provided as required. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 35 XV. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? No Impact. The project not would exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would generate wastewater. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development would generate wastewater that would have to be treated by the wastewater treatment plant that serves the city. Wastewater generated in National City is treated at the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment plant. The treatment plant has capacity to treat the wastewater generated in National City, including the project area, without changing the existing wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. The wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board that presently exist and as amended in the future from time to time would continue to govern wastewater treatment in National City independent of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment would not impact wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. The project would not exceed require the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing facilities that could cause significant environmental effects because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would generate wastewater. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development would not require the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities because the Point Loma treatment plant has capacity to handle the wastewater generated by future development based on the National City General Plan. Since no expansion of existing treatment facilities or the construction of new wastewater facilities would be required, future development generated indirectly by the 2007 Amendment would not have impacts with regards to environmental effects of expanding or construction new wastewater treatment plants. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. The project would not require or result in the construction of new storm drain facilities or the expansion of existing facilities because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would generate wastewater. Community Development Commission of National City - Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 36 Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development could require the construction of new drainage facilities or the expansion and extension of existing facilities to adequately serve the project. The construction of new or expanded storm drain facilities could have environmental effects depending upon the scale of the improvements. The city would review all development projects and determine if the existing storm drain facilities are adequate or if new facilities are necessary. If new drainage facilities or the expansion of existing facilities were required, the city would also determine if there could be environmental impacts with their construction. If potential environmental impacts could occur, the city would require measures to mitigate the impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not directly impact storm drain facilities. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? No Impact. The project would not impact existing water supplies because development is not proposed in conjunction with or as part of the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would have a need for potable water. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development would generate a need for potable water for drinking, landscape irrigation, and fire flow. Depending upon the type and intensity of development the existing water supplies may not be adequate to provide a sufficient water supply for a project. The city along with the Sweetwater Authority would review all development proposals to determine if there is a sufficient supply of water or if additional water supplies would be required. As applicable, all projects would be required to incorporate water conservation measures to reduce water consumption. The 2007 Amendment would not have any water supply impacts since development is not proposed in conjunction with the 2007 Amendment. e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider that serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? No Impact. The 2007 Amendment would not exceed wastewater treatment capacity of the Point Loma Wastewater Treatment Plant because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would generate wastewater. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development would generate wastewater that would be treated by the Point Loma treatment plant. The wastewater would not impact the San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department and its ability to provide wastewater treatment services. By agreement, the City of National City is allowed to generate 7.5 million gallons of wastewater per day to the South Metro Interceptor Sewer. Flows in National City as of August 2003 were 5.67 million gallons per day, which allows capacity for additional wastewater flows by future development without requiring the San Diego Wastewater Department to increase or expand the capacity of any trunk lines or the Point Loma treatment plant. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? No Impact. The project would not exceed the landfill capacity of the landfill that serves National City because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 37 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would generate solid waste. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development would generate solid waste that would have to be deposited at the local landfill. The landfill that serves National City has capacity to adequately handle the solid waste generated by the city without significantly impacting its' life expectancy. The 2007 Amendment would not directly have any impacts to the capacity of the landfill that serves the city. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. The project would not be affected by statutes and regulations related to solid waste because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would generate solid waste. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development would generate solid waste that would have to be deposited at the local landfill, which has adequate capacity. The 2007 Amendment would not change or affect any statutes and regulations that affect solid waste. XVI. ENERGY: Would the project: a) Result in an adverse impact on local and regional energy supplies, including base or peak period demands, regardless of the presence of a would -serve letter from the appropriate energy provider? No Impact. The project would not impact local or regional energy supplies because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C - "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that would require energy. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Additional development would require energy in the form of electricity and natural gas for heating, cooling, lighting, etc. The city would require would -serve letters from the utility companies to ensure that adequate energy supplies are available to serve projects prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. At this time the city does not anticipate that development would impact energy supplies. The 2007 Amendment would not directly have any impact on energy supplies. b) Conflict with existing energy standards? No Impact. Please see response a) above. c) Would the project reduce solar access or opportunities for passive heating and cooling on the site or nearby property? No Impact. The project would not reduce solar access or opportunities for passive heating and cooling on any property in the project areas because development is not proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 38 on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could reduce solar access. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Development could reduce solar access or impact opportunities for passive heating and cooling depending upon the intensity and design of the project. The city would review all projects for potential solar access impacts and require changes accordingly to reduce solar access impacts and enhance passive solar heating and cooling opportunities. The 2007 Amendment would not directly have any solar access impacts. XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No Impact. The project would not impact fish or wildlife populations because there is no development directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, or cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below a self-sustaining level. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) No Impact. The project would not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable because there is no development directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could cause cumulative impacts. c) Does the project have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No Impact. The project would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings because development is not directly proposed in conjunction with the adoption of the 2007 Amendment. The 2007 Amendment 1) extends the authority of the Community Development Commission to use eminent domain until 2019, 2) amends the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, 3) updates the Transportation Center section governing the Mile of Cars and 4) revises Exhibit C — "Public Facilities/Infrastructure Improvement Projects. The 2007 Amendment does not propose public or private development projects that could have adverse environmental effects. Indirectly the use of eminent domain to acquire property could result in development in the project area. Development could have impacts that cause substantial adverse effects on humans. The city would review all future projects for potential impacts to humans and the environment and require changes accordingly to reduce or eliminate the impacts. The 2007 Amendment would not directly have any impacts on human beings. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration/Initial Study Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain May 2007 Page 39 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Prepared: May 8, 1995 Adopted: July 18, 1995 Amended: December 1, 1981 May 22, 1984 April 16, 1985 June 18, 1991 July 18, 1995 June 19, 2001 July _, 2007 Prepared for: Community Development Commission of the City of National City 140 E. 12th Street, Suite B National City, California 91950-3312 619-336-4250 Prepared by: Rosenow Spevacek Group, Inc. 540 North Golden Circle, Suite 305 Santa Ana, California 92705 714/541-4585 619/967-6462 c:\documents and settings \mdalla\local settings \temporary intemet flies \olkaa\rdplan.doc Adopted 7/1 8/95 SECTION I. (100) INTRODUCTION 1 A. (101) General 1 SECTION II. (200) BACKGROUND 2 SECTION III. (300) GENERAL DEFINITIONS 2 SECTION IV. (400) PROJECT AREA BOUNDARIES 4 SECTION V. (500) REDEVELOPMENT PLAN GOALS 4 SECTION VI. (600) REDEVELOPMENT ACTIONS 5 A. (601) General 5 B. (602) Property Acquisition 7 C. (605) Participation by Owners and Persons Engaged in Business 8 D. (609) Implementing Rules 9 E. (610) Cooperation with Public Bodies 10 F. (611) Property Management 10 G. (612) Payments to Taxing Agencies 10 H. (613) Relocation of Persons Displaced by a Project 11 I. (616) Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements, Site Preparation and Removal 11 J. (621) Rehabilitation, Moving of Structures by the CDC and Seismic Repairs 13 K. (625) Property Disposition and Development 14 L. (630) Provision for Low and Moderate Income Housing 16 SECTION VII. (700) USES PERMITTED IN THE PROJECT AREA 20 A. (701) Map and Uses Permitted 20 B. (702) Major Land Use Designations (as now provided in the General Plan) 20 C. (703) Transportation Center 21 D. (704) Public Uses 22 E. (707) Conforming Properties 22 F. (708) Nonconforming Uses 23 G. (709) Interim Uses 23 H. (710) General Controls and Limitations 23 I. (720) Design for Development 25 J. (721) Building Permits 26 SECTION VIII. (800) METHODS FOR FINANCING THE PROJECT 26 A. (801) General Description of the Proposed Financing Methods 26 B. (802) Tax Increment Revenue 27 C. (803) CDC Bonds 33 D. (804) Other Loans and Grants 34 c:\documents and settings \ntdalla\Iocal settings\temporary intemet files \olkaa\rdplan.doc Adopted 7/18/95 E. (805) Rehabilitation Loans, Grants, and Rebates 34 SECTION IX. (900) ACTIONS BY THE CITY 34 SECTION X. (1000) ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT 35 SECTION XI. (1100) DURATION OF THIS PLAN 35 SECTION XII. (1200) PROCEDURE FOR AMENDMENT 36 EXHIBIT A 37 EXHIBIT B 3 8 EXHIBIT C 39 EXHIBIT D 40 c:\documents and settings\mdalla\local settings\temporary interne files \olkaa\rdplan.doc Adopted 7/18/95 MEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 ITEM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — National City Car Show at 401 Mile of Cars Way on July 7, 2007 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. PREPARED BY Joe Olson, 336-4210 DEPARTMENT Building & Safety EXPLANATION This is a request from J3 Productions/National City Car Show to conduct the 2007 National City Car Show at 401 Mile of Cars Way on July 7, 2007 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. This event is designed to raise awareness of the auto dealerships in National City. The sponsoring organization hopes to make this an annual event. This event will require closure of Hoover Ave. between Mile of Cars Way and 22nd St. This particular area will be used as a staging area. The parking lot at Aswan Hall (401 Mile of Cars Way) will contain all vehicles in the show. Private security will be hired for crowd control and all clean-up will be completed by the applicant. Entertainment will consist of a band playing on a stage provided by the applicant. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Approved By: The City has incurred S345.00 for processing the "FUP, plus $449.00 Finance Director for the Fire Permit(s), and $187.46 for Public Works Total cost: $981.46. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A d7gue: ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Application for a Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and conditions of approval. A•200 (9/99) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: J3 Productions/National City Car Show EVENT: National City Car Show DATE OF EVENT: July 7, 2007 TIME OF EVENT: 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. A PPROVALS: PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] COMMUNITY SERVICES YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] RISK MANAGER YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] ENGINEERING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] PUBLIC WORKS YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO 1 1 SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FIRE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] POLICE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x CITY ATTORNEY YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: POLICE (619) 336-4400 Security: In lieu of Police officers on overtime, the Police Department recommends that the event be required to hire a California Licensed security organization, such as Elite Security, that has experience working crowd control. There should be two (2) security staff per 1,000 participants. Traffic: Closing 2100 block of Hoover Ave. should not impact surface street traffic. We do not recommend the closure of Mile of Cars Way or National City Blvd. ENGINEERING Please confirm with Engineering 2 weeks prior to the event to check, modify, and confirm schedule, in case of construction in the vicinity. For more information, please contact Charles at 619-336-4380. FIRE (619) 336-4550 1. Fire access to be maintained at all times, minimum width of 20' with a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6". 2. Access to be maintained at all times to all Fire Department connections and appliances, (fire hydrants, sprinkler system connections, etc.). 3. Site map to be provided showing the layout of the display area, tire access points etc. 4. 2A:10BC fire extinguishers required. Fire extinguisher locations to me plainly marked, and not to exceed a travel distance of seventy-five (75) feet. 5. Cooking area to have one 2A:10BC. If grease or oil is used in cooking a 40:BC or type "K" Eire extinguisher will be required. All fire extinguishers to have a current State Fire Marshal Tag attached. 6. Tents having an area in excess of 200 square feet and or canopies in excess of 400 square feet or multiple tents and canopies placed together equaling or greater than the above stated areas, are to be used, they are to be flame- retardant treated and a permit form the Fire Department must be obtained. Permit fees are $349.00. Fees can only be waived by the City Council. 7. First aid station to be provided and equipped. First aid station to be stalled by personnel trained at a minimum level of Advance First Aid and CPR certified. 8. Minimum $100.00 after hour inspection fee is required for all Fire Safety Inspections taking place after hours, weekends and holidays. FINANCE (619) 336-4330 1. J3 Productions needs a business license. CITY ATTORNEY 1. Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement, and a policy of general liability insurance, with the City, Parking Authority, and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with amounts of coverage to he determined by the Risk Manager. 3 RISK MANAGER (619) 336-4300 I've reviewed the application for the proposed use and note that the event will be held on private property at Aswan Hall from 6 a.m. through 6 p.m. July 7th to accommodate set up and clean up. Attendance is anticipated at 3000 spectators with 200 participants. The applicant sponsoring for -profit organization, J3 Productions, has signed the Hold Harmless and Indemnification Agreement, however no evidence of insurance has been provided since the event is on private property. I recommend that we require the sponsor to provide evidence of commercial general liability insurance with minimum limits of $I M per occurrence/$2M aggregate because of the nature of the gathering and the number of expected participants. In addition, because the sponsoring organization intends to hire professional security, I would recommend that the security company provide evidence of liability insurance with limits of at least $ I M per occurrence/ $2M aggregate. It is unclear from the application if the sponsoring organization intends to cook and sell food and drinks. That should be clarified. Let me know if you have any questions Ashley Fenton, Risk Manager PUBLIC WORKS (619) 336-4580 Street Division 1. Staff will barricade affected streets and remove them when the event is over. 2. Staff will post "No Parking" signs along affected streets before the event. 3. The cost to provide Street personnel support for this event is estimated to be $187.46. This amount should be paid to the City, unless waived by the City Council. i. "No Parking" signs 12 @ $0.45 ea $ 5.40 ii. Barricades 10 @ $0.35 ea. = 3.50 iii. Equipment/Truck Hours 4 hrs @ $12.07 — 48.28 iv. Overtime Hours 4 hrs @ $32.57 $130.28 v. Total $18_46 Parks Division 1. Applicant marked that they are requesting the City Stage and PA. The applicant is NOT requesting the stage or the PA system per our conversation on June 4, 2007. 2. The Public Works Parks Division has no involvement in this event. Fees finless waived by the City Council, the applicant shall pay $187.46 for staff costs associated with this permit request. Co;on site' na Chief Officer of Organization 'Name) `-,1 c=P1--t P' Rid Applicant (Name). --lase-Pi-1 t IEA Address 1. .16; L - Type of Event: Public Concert Parade Motion Picture Event Title Fair _Demonstration Grand Opening Festival Circus Other NATION i, C+Tc1 CA 129NDvJ Community Event Block Party Event Location: 401 MILE ()F CARS_ Why ( /NS IA)" IQ 14 J O L-(-1 , Zoo k Event Date(s): From to Total Anticipated Attendance: tvirmili/DayTYenr ( e%Participants) 11 t� (_TX -Spectators) Actual Event (lours: !�,m to ✓ arr prr Setup/assernhly/construction Date: t fat Start time: 6 aryl Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details). _ STAG TC-0TS 1Tl�f�Lf c4+�s , �3 _Q15 j (91'14 CA11-51 (G Dismantte Date: 4 / 1/0q—Completion Time: _ am�ir List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event. Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of reopening. ft?oVE A11 o c i s M(Li DT rriD w 7,z-Nn s-r. C 1- Sponsorincg Organization: P(2r7-C7fUNS/.1"-'T7C1t.)"{ -fir Not- or -!'refit i2& f - vJ) C4711 CA1 ere5-0 Daytime Phone 6( �� Jv � rt;r;i; f 'ion-. 6(-/' 6t2' i''k _ 4'q 1 g2; the. - "\ir t-( mid 30" ce,f-g- J NOTE: THIS PERSON MUST HE IN All ENDANCE. FOR 1 AND IMMEDIA1 CLY AVAILABLE TO CITY OFFICIALS HE DURATION OF -1tit EVENT t,;3a rd rvl G? S'T�4' (i c-wici 1 e nu+r p' L Cz 4-11Gtp { 511 o 1'0 Is your organization a'Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? _ YES X NO Are admission, entry, vendor or participant fees required? >( YES NO If YES. please explain the purpose and provide a ount(s): ttMJCe ,1 fo / CA-Z9 2 ; /Kr(2_s F - e vcN*Oatz5 2.0-r, 30, o Oo $ .2,o, coo Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this event. Estimated Expenses for this event. $ A What is the projected amount of revenue that the Nonprofit Organization will —7— receive as a result ()Lillis event? ('lease provide a DETAILED DESCRIPTION of your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides or any other pertinent information about the event. tsJ 1 t,vDR-K-•- f2 %)& t~ Ft) r`J ►==> o--r. 77pc0( z TC exkis %Ct J te- 61,013s Atmera,e-k1 CM lrv7:t'JS� i 0I- -t Fl-tT C itcj `To Pt-Om-0-re: MOn-g c- jr A019 f u p0 CA-aAttot-J r611- al S. -"Kt) L L-€511 'FA-11' , to I v I �n1Ga-e'ev . ('nenoTom- tL6 15vtjr5SES _Ta -ERJ vLtiL-ST( C Cam, ( m :1v C, t I Yi; I T -fi ; sale .)I thR (.il:> ::or '' '')c.I�Jri3 ti C?,I t. i1„��'� � tr t,:. LS, an;-dlillticna1 .t(, iI i_>'. 1 v" nr; I Ine YES %ENO Does the event involve the sale or use of alcoholic: beverages? YES XNO Will items or services be sold at the event If yes, please describe: _ YES S[ f1O Does the event involve a rnoving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. YE7,�t�O Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES., attach a detailed site reap showing all streets impacted by the event. NO Does the event involve the use of tents or canopies? If YES: Number of tent/canopies �� Sizes 1O x 1 O f "� ?a NOTE A separate Fire Department permit is required for tents or canopies. ES NO Will the event involve the use of the City stage or PA system? In addition to the route reap required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layout and setup locations for the following items: Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession andlor Beer Garden areas. Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas Please describe how food will be served at (he event• N intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method GAS _._ _ELEC;1RIC _..__ CHARCOAL OTHf-R (Specify): Portable and/or Permanent toilet i acilitn s Number of portable toilets. _ (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can slimy that there are fa!:dilies in the immediate area available to the public during the event) Tables and Chairs Y Fencing, bairrers and!or barricades ,- Generator locations and/or source of electricity Canopies or tent locations (include tent/c:anopy dimensions) i- Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures i Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms. stages, grandstands or related structures Vehicles and/or trailers / Other related event Gimp olierit ; not CCvered above Rash containers and dump;ters (Note: You rnust properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and imln r1'atcly up::r cercdusiee ::I the event the area must he returned to d clean cundition ri�il llrr('r of trash=•� �E �����', r:d5 t1 %�l�!a!ner i t411n Il;f� 1\10/ (D5 Do'srtribe 'rlllr filar for _i ,fl-1.p ,if:t rr'rn7:Jl ':)' \Wrist.' :+n i gdit):',ge duCng and atter ;tie !went. (IA time Pam--Z-i "j - Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Security. P (1-i k T� S Cc% r� > -c / N� et\.1 cif U lF.l i a w .J / sc:c URATur UGEr5 YES' _.._ NO Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangements for this event? if YES, please list: Security Organization: Security Organization Address: Security Director (Name): Phone- ' ' Is this a night event? It YES. please state how the event and surrounding area will be illuminated to ensure safety of the participants and spectators: Please indicate what arrangement you have made for providing First Aid Staffing and Equipment Please describe your Acx:essibihty Plan fur access at your e✓ent by individuals vrth disabi!i;ies. Please prnvrcle a detailed description of your PARKING plan CUT 10 E'i r tAF.›LiC.. p ►-f_4(i 6X,, / T(Zb Luc?-2- �Zf---7Le) Please, vow plan for DISABLED Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event: NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. NO Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Nurnber of Stages: Number of Bands: ror'1 N { � rroc/ R 4 i / Type of Music NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: 1 Start t:rne: _ ,D�%_ _ am pm Finish Time 5t� am/pnr NC) Will sound checks he concluded prior to the event? If YES, please indicate Start time anii'pm Finish lime amiprn Please tlescribe the sound equipment that will he used tor your event: 0 Fireworks. rockets. or other pyrotechnics? If Yt S, please describe Z S NC% Any signs. banners, decorations, special lighting? If YES, please describe: J I GIN Lc1 t Event: _Tor Office 'Use Only Department Date Approved? Yes No _ Initial Specific Conditions of Approval Council Meeting Date: Approved: Yes No Vote: U::pr,rtrne_n! City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insurance must be attached to this permit. Organization � 'G� 1�15 G� P- `i Gi✓ Person in Charge of Activity `s t24 "�Vi Address Telephone gZqL Uo►U-p2sl714 i vE, C&r`i, 4I 4-Date(s) of Use LA ''ESA /07 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT As a condition of the issuance of a temporary use permit to conduct its activities on public or private property, the undersigned hereby agree(s) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City and the Parking Authority and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, losses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage, or both, or any litigation and other liability, including attorneys fees and the costs of litigation, arising out of or related to the use of public property or the activity taken under the permit by the permittee or its agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Applicant Otfcial I dk: — Date Fur ()fin:. Cer tlfv-AtE: ct irlSllranc App;ovoci -_ ---- Date Non-profit organizations, which meet the criteria on page v of the instructions, will be considered for a waiver. If you would like to request a waiver of the processing fees, please complete the questionnaire below. 1. Is the event for which the TUP is sought sponsored by a non-profit • organization? Yes (proceed to Question 2) _ 7-)No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 2. Please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the TUP is sought and then proceed to Question 3. Name of the sponsoring organization trTiOk- J 3 ptz-09 u C.=T(A; tv , Type of Organization - ' e)/w_€ 1146 (Service Club, Church, Social Service Agency, etc ) 3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds t the sponsoring organization? Yes (Please proceed to Question 4) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 4. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. No (Please proceed to Question 5) 5. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. SAt..e� pai 1'00 fliCkDON312 VCOv tt C Coc-2s / S ELLWIN.) 0 "RA C-c~1.4 tt �Ga G/kSC 7ru fFt L '11Lc ( >!z- -"(1p J yFtt R--rA--( i fNCFLCE��� v-usi s5 A<-EscLE-JE No (Please proceed to Question 6) 6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? 72 Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. l r� (c-- tx+(J` tc Pc-a-Gek) Tf1 be P-m u V kJ 1 1131 fte _ t-- l O N s. Ct.-J [3 f- T N ATlUN )TP4-'1 l TR 't t L1 Pt i N Es No (Please proceed to Question 7) 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes Year funds were received: Funds were used to: No (P lease sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) Wationa1 City, CA - Google Maps Page 1 of 1 le • • 44 • • A .s..tt, • Address National City, CA • • , 0 • _ so" \?•_‘, • 1. o •1:-20 • - • kt, :3;.• 03,1191/_Goog1e, Map data ©2007 NAVTEQ. - Terms\Vse http://maps.google.eorn/maps?f—q&111—en&q—National 3 City, I CA& i e=11.1T88E11-32.6619... 5/31/2007 ULY 7T" 2007 ICri-Frui SPONSORSHIP, VENDORS & VOLUNTEERS' AREALL WELC0/14 FOR INFO au. (619) 325-9577 OR MI www.nationalcitycarshow.com a TARI-16,01 6191 Presented by: (6191 977 502J exAdt, .,,grambiz MEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 �EM TITLE TEMPORARY USE PERMIT — South Bay Aquatics 24 Hour Relay at National City Municipal Pool from August 3, 2007 to August 4, 2007 from 5 p.m. to 5 p.m. PREPARED BY Joe Olson, 336-4210 DEPARTMENT Building & Safety EXPLANATION This is a request from South Bay Aquatics to conduct a 24 Hour Relay event at the National City Municipal Pool from August 3-4, 2007. The event will start at 5 p.m. on August 3rd This event is designed to raise money for the South Bay Aquatics Swim Team and the Challenged Athletes Foundation. Additionally, some of the funds will be used to help purchase Starting Platforms for the pool, in an effort to host USA Swimming Sanctioned events in the future. A D.J. will provide entertainment from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m. on August 3rd. Five 8' x 12' tents will be on site, and there will be a professional medical person and a lifeguard on site during the event. A private Security company will be contracted between 6 p.m. to 6 a.m. The applicant is requesting use of the main lobby and locker rooms. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement Approved By: The City has incurred $345.00 for processing the TUP, plus $349.00 Finance Director for the Fire Permit(s), Total cost: $694.00 Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve the Application for a Temporary Use Permit subject to compliance with all conditions of approval. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Application for a Temporary Use Permit with recommended approvals and conditions of approval. A-200 (9/99) 1 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY USE PERMIT RECOMMENDED APPROVALS AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, SPONSORING ORGANIZATION: South Bay Aquatics 24 Dour Relay EVENT: 24 Hour Relay DATE OF EVENT: August 3-4, 2007 TIME OF EVENT: 5 p.m. to 5 p.m. APPROVALS;. PLANNING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] COMMUNITY SERVICES YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ ] RISK MANAGER YES j x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] ENGINEERING YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] PIIBLIC WORKS YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FINANCE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] FIRE YES [ x I NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x POLICE YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] CITY ATTORNEY YES [ x ] NO [ ] SEE CONDITIONS [ x ] CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: POLICE (619) 336-4400 N.C.P.D. will notify patrol division to make extra patrol checks during event, especially during night hours. ENGINEERING No CIP Projects in the event's vicinity anticipated as of date. Please confirm with Engineering 2 weeks prior to the event to check, modify, and confirm schedule, if necessary. For more information, please contact Kenneth Fernandez at 619-336-4388. Please note that the Wa1-Mart parking lot is private property. Any arrangements should be made with Wa1-Mart's management regarding usage of their parking facilities. FINANCE (619) 336-4330 1. South Bay Aquatics needs to apply for a business license. 2 FIRE (619) 336-4550 I . Tents having an area in excess of 200 square feet and or canopies in excess of 400 square feet or multiple tents and or canopies placed together equaling or greater than the above stated areas, are to be used, they shall he flame- retardant treated with an approved State Fire Marshal seal attached. A permit from the Fire Department must be obtained. Permit fee is three hundred and forty nine (349.00) dollars. Fees can only be waived by the City Council. 2. Emergency access to be maintained at all times. All vehicles must he park in marked stalls. CITY ATTORNEY 1. Requires an indemnification and hold harmless agreement, and a policy of general liability insurance, with the City, Parking Authority, and its officials, employees, agents and volunteers as additional insureds, with amounts of coverage to be determined by the Risk Manager. RISK MANAGER (619) 336-4300 I've reviewed the application for the proposed use and note that the event will be held on City property at Las Palmas Pool/National City Municipal Pool from 4:30 p.m. on August 3'1 through 6 p.m. August 4th to accommodate set up and clean up. Of the estimated 100 people anticipated to attend, 60 will be participants and the rest spectators and support. The applicant sponsoring organization, South Bay Aquatics, has signed the I1o1d Harmless and Indemnification Agreement and the insurance certificate appears to provide evidence of sufficient liability coverage. The City is also included as an additional insured. There appears to he adequate medical coverage however we need to ensure that NCFD and AMR arc aware of the event. Both the lifeguard on duty and the medical personnel must possess current CPR and/or BLS certification. In addition to the parent volunteers, the sponsoring organization intends to hire professional security for the evening hours. They need to ensure that the security organization also has commercial liability insurance with limits of at least $1 M per occurrence and $2M aggregate. I would request that the security company name the City as an additional insured as well. Other than those suggestions, I have no objection to the event as proposed. l .et me know if you have any questions — Ashley Fenton, Risk Manager 3 Type of Event: _ Public Conceit Parade Motion Picture Fair Demonstration Grand Opening n® Ig _ Festival _ Community Event 4 cj Circus - Block Party z 111 XOther Nw , ei 4r5.St,. bv., 4 t:C s Event Title: SOi.a lli &Ty / tt'tl/itS a If / /oi,r %2lltj y Event Location: 4k')-i�e' / e 37 ✓ 4t h r• Pee Event Date(s): Frome..3%L7 to 2J4)177 Total Anticipated Attendance: / �`✓C/ MonihiDay/Year (Fi 0 Participants) ( -trC, Spectators) Actual Event Hours:S:0g a pnr to ame5 Setup/assembly/construction Date: 8J310 7 Start time: '-i 0Cfn,o1, Please describe the scope of your setup/assembly work (specific details): n5b /) e Lines :�, tirig) _ 4ti£1, ancJ eek 5t./•ruff due :lir tif eb,eu. Dismantle Date: p / yJQ 7 Completion Time: : UV a 1 List any street(s) requiring closure as a result of this event Include street name(s), day and time of closing and day and time of reopening. ti/4 Sponsoring Organization. S aN �7", (7riS! au)'-j/C.S) Chief Officer of Organization (Name) "i77kr, ply-4 de %, Applicant (Name):' Ort ��f Airy, 1G%¢y�L'Ji�'a_ %/L .-- j�---- Address ti J �_ 6Ar_i' �N 4' ±n,` 1 For Profit Not -for -Profit Daytime 4'hone. (Net)17.1-i6911b FAen'rio f'rinne 14/ i 2C7- 9O/O I ax: t$S$)5L1±- 70 Contact Person "on site day of the e: nl. 1j1� 'ci ✓Q(441j.*/ I'r+;1er;Ccllr.l�r _4_oi = l.%,.Z-/v917t.4 - -- NOTE: THIS PERSON MIDST BE IN ATTENDANCE FOR THE DURATION OF THE EVENT AND IMMEDIATELY AVAILABLE TO Cli Y OFFICIALS |vyour organization u"Tax Exempt, nonprofit" organization? XYES NO Are admission, entry, vendor orparticipant fees required? YES NO |/ YES, please explain the purpose and provide amuuni(x): �� ����^0 Estimated Gross Receipts including ticket, product and sponsorship sales from this event. $ �-5 VO Estimated Expenses for this event. s / '3, 5T C' What inthe projected amount ofrevenue that the Nonprofit Organization will receive uooresult of/hixevent? Please provide aDETAILED DESCRIPTION o/your event. Include details regarding any components of your event such as the use of vehicles, animals, rides- or any other pertinent ififoiniatic)(i about the evefit. �}.������ �Y��» ��������^ S N0 |fthe vxcotinvolves 'hpsgan<cars, mKthe ry/som'�exdvo,ck/,cm Nv/iooa|C:tycar dlen|ers7||NO, list xn'a(�1iti'mo/clov|c/sinvolved *Vxe sme --------- —'-- — — —' — ` y— � _ YES ;.NO Does the event involve the sate or use of alcoholic beverages? YES NO Will iterns or services be sold at the event? If yes, please describe: _ YES )(NO Does the event involve a moving route of any kind along streets, sidewalks or highways? If YES, attach a detailed map of your proposed route indicate the direction of travel, and provide a written narrative to explain your route. x YES NO Does the event involve a fixed venue site? If YES, attach a detailed site map showing all streets impacted by the event. YES NO Does the event involve the use of tents or canopies? If YES: Number of tent/canopies „j Sizes g r x j L' NOTE: A separate Fire Department permit is required for tents or canopies. YLS X N(I) Will the event involve the use of the City stage or PA system? In addition to the route map required above, please attach a diagram showing the overall layord and sot -up locations for the following items: Alcoholic and Nonalcoholic Concession and/or Beer Garden areas. Food Concession and/or Food Preparation areas Please describe how food will be served at the event. If you intend to cook food in the event area please specify the method: GAS _ El ECTRIC CHARCOAL OTHER (Specify): Portable and/or Permanent I oilet Facilities Number of portable toilets• (1 for every 250 people is required, unless the applicant can show that there are facilities in the immediate area available to the public during the event) Tables and Chairs r Fencing, barriers and/or barricades Y Generator locations and/or source of electricity Canopies or tent locations (include tent/canopy dimensions) 1. Booths, exhibits, displays or enclosures Scaffolding, bleachers, platforms, stages, grandstands or related structures Vehicles and/or trailers Other related event components riot covered above Trash containers and dumpsters (Note: You must properly dispose of waste and garbage throughout the term of your event and irnrnediately upon conclusion of the event the area must he reunited to a clean c:ondit,on Numt.e of ira5h cans. trash cnntaniers wiltr tuts Daascribe your plan for c ie;id•op and reniu�al of waste and garbage during and after the even! Please describe your procedures for both Crowd Control and Internal Security: Yo✓eilt (/:)ILf ylh'7i5. YES NO Have you hired any Professional Security organization to handle security arrangements for this event? If YES, please list: We e la ' c r► h , r rn9 Security Organization: ,art, "rab-nsrt atrH•s,/f 0110n4;aa . Security Organization Address: Security Director (Name): _ Phone: NO Is this a night event? If YES, please state how the event and surrounding area will be illuminated to ensure safety of the participants and spectators: rOc;l,)/ i.yi-r},`�`l Please indicate what arrangement you have ma e for providing First Aid Staffing and Equipment. Thtrr g,,:ll .7 /7c %h u 1-)Fe9keirt t Md 1 rr/ed,'uarlrn `, ✓ � j.95 .,ii1 [ DI � 1 ct-►,7 � , 1 C q t- q i i Please describe your Accessibility Plan for access at your event by individuals with disabilities - /et L- ,'co) i,jedetrdy• Please provide a deta ler.1 description of your PARKING plan: Pool l�it • Ici r y Gc 1.5 Please describe yo! it plan for DISAFI F, S )at t 5 c7e£ %/.v,V'd Please describe your plans to notify all residents, businesses and churches impacted by the event: ✓tipa kid) /0,j/4ea'i,y &-i//O i'e5;d1F1J5 by edishr4br.,J r inA,„,a,7`o7.74/ Fiytr> egcl+ der�-r NOTE: Neighborhood residents must be notified 72 hours in advance when events are scheduled in the City parks. YES NC) Are there any musical entertainment features related to your event? If YES, please state the number of stages, number of bands and type of music. Number of Stages: Number of Bands: fype of Music: %t`YES NO Will sound amplification be used? If YES, please indicate: Start tune• 5'. OO ____arnFinish Time Cf i, Od am� YES NO Will sound checks be conducted poor to the event? If YES, please Innccate• Start time. _ _ amfpm Finish Time Please describe the sound equipment that will be used fa your event. YES X.NO Fireworks, rockets, or other pyrotechnics? If YES, please describe: YES A.NO Any signs, hanners, decorations, special fighting? If YES. please describe. NEVI; :i: ti,i; 1O C Event: For Office Use Only Department Date Approved? Yes No Initial Specific Conditions of Approval Council Meeting Date: Approved: Yes No Vote: Kathleen f r- — -; Director Building . Safety Department City of National City PUBLIC PROPERTY USE HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT Persons requesting use of City property, facilities or personnel are required to provide a minimum of $1,000,000 combined single limit insurance for bodily injury and property damage which includes the City, its officials, agents and employees named as additional insured and to sign the Hold Harmless Agreement. Certificate of insuranceumust be attached to this permit. y Organization ,SOrs !L(3 t a y / Aci c 5 • Person in Charge of ActivityI O -1 Paradre ASk, Address U9 "1/I/Y J-h, eon; try, cr1 %U Telephone 60- 9 Date(s) of Use '7J 3%Ll7 — 7/Ril1" 7 HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT As a condition of the issuance of a temporary use permit to conduct its activities on public or private property, the undersigned hereby agree(s) to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of National City and the Parking Authority and its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, costs, fosses, liability or, for any personal injury, death or property damage, or both, or any litigation and other liability, including attorneys fees and the costs of litigation, arising out of or related to the use of public property or the activity taken under the permit by the permittee or its agents, employees or contractors. Signature of Applicant l-idol Coat l z_/ 0 7 Official Title Date Fo, Office ilsn Only Certifictae of In siirance Approved _ 1O Date Non-profit organizations, which meet the criteria on page v of the instructions, will be considered for a waiver. If you would like to request a waiver of the processing fees, please complete the questionnaire below. 1. Is the event for which the TUP is sought sponsored by a non-profit organization? Yes (proceed to Question 2) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 2. Please state the name and type of organization sponsoring the event for which the TUP is sought and then proceed toQuestion3. Name of the sponsoring organization �OGt i3Q 1/4'17 r� Type of Organization 5 4.: s wl Te s k&-i (Service Club, Church, Social Service Agency, etc ) 3. Will the event generate net income or proceeds t the sponsoring organization? Vc Yes (Please proceed to Question 4) No (Please sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) 4. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an individual who resides in or is employed in the city, and who is in dire financial need due to health reasons or a death in the family? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. ti( No (Please proceed to Question 5) 5. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to city government such as the generation of sales tax? Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. X. No (Please proceed to Question 6) 6. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to a service club, social services agency, or other secular non-profit organization located within the city such as Kiwanis, Rotary, Lions, Boys and Girls Club? 1)L. Yes (Please provide an explanation and details. tttceneeti el -es gour1d l,L 7l No (Please proceed to Question 7) 7. Will the proceeds provide a direct financial benefit to an organization, which has been the direct recipient of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding? Yes Year funds were received: Funds were used to: No (P lease sign the form and submit it with the TUP Application) Signature Date t2 ACORD. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MWODIYY) 01/09/07 PRODUCER Risk Management Services, Inc. p Box 32712 Phoenix, AZ 85064-2712 1-800-777-4930 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED SOUTH BAY AQUATICS USA Swimming etal Incl Local Swimming Committees TOM PARADOWSKI 5509 AMADITA LANE BONITA, CA 91902-2201 INSURER A: Lexington Insurance Company INSURER O: Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company INSURER C. INSIMFR D: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE ANY MAY POLICIES. POLICIES REQUIREMENT, PERTAIN, OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITII THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. FOR THE POLICY RESPECT TO WHICH TO ALL THE TERMS, POLICY EXPIRATION DATE IMM,O YY1 PERIOD' INDICATED. NOTWRHSTANDING THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH TYPE OF INSURANCE T'OLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE IMM/DDIYYI LIMITSLTR A GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY JCLAIMS MADE I 1 I OCCUR 390-4890 _..... I}p.��lT .p�� 01/01/07 01/01/08 EACH OCCURRENCE $2,000,000 $ 100 , 000 X FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fee) MED EXP (Any ono person) $ EXCLUDED X Participant Legal PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 1,000,000 $4,000,000 X Liability Included GENERALAGGREGAIE GEM. AGGREGATE LIMIT APPUESPtR: X .1 POLICY r.__ 1 O (.._1 Loc PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $2.000,000 ._. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON OWNED AUTOS (! F._„ FEB 1 3 Z007 COMMUNrTY SERVICES j1AT1lJNAi.'.A ,D DEPT. GA COMBINED SINGLE LIMB (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) S _ — BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO AUTO ONLY- EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN FA ACC S AUTO ONLY: AGG S YI EXCESS _ X1 LABIWY - AI OCCUR I _ 1 EXAMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE RL'TFNTION $ 5629776 01/01/07 01/01/08 EAGI OCCURRENCE $ 3,000,000 AGGREGATE $ 6,000,000 $ S S WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS'LIABIUTY WC STATU- OTH- 70RY1IMITS ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT S E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ S----- E.L. DISEASE - I'OLFCV OMIT B B OTHER AD & D XS ACC MED/DENTAL T5MPSP35054 T5MPSP35054 01/01/07 01/01/07 01/01/08 01/01/08 Maximum $5,000 $25,000 $ Maximum DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONSILOCATIONSNEHICLESIEXGLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Verification of General/Excess Liability for INSURED ACTIVITIES per attached. The Certificate Holder is included as Additional Insured per attached ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT EFFECTIVE CERTIFICATE ISSUE DATE. CERTIFICATE HOLDER (1 I ADDITIONAL INSURED; INSURER LETTER CANCELLATION E National City 1200 National City Blvd SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION GATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL I I? MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, e I M5Y.11,11.7..1= XlYSvyeryt `J rX National City, CA 91950 USA AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25-S (7/97) SI-SBA 5517752 o ACORD CORPORATION 1988 ATTACHMENT TO USA SWIMMING CERTIFICATE ADDITIONAL NAMED INSUREDS: It is agreed that the following persons or organizations shall be defined as an Additional Named Insured. Furthermore, the Additional Named insured shall be included under the Persons Insured section of this policy as an Insured, solely as respects to liability arising from insured activities. a. b. United States Swimming, Inc., clubs and seasonal clubs which athletes or participants and coaches are members of United States Swimming, Inc. United States Swimming, Inc., member(s) and volunteer(s) while acting at the direction of, and within the scope of their duties for a Named insured. However, none of these member(s) and volunteer(s) are insured for Personal Injury and Advertising Injury. ADDITIONAL NAMED INSURED - INSURED ACTIVITIES: The insurance afforded by this policy applies to any Additional Named Insured for insured activities. insured activities are defined as: a. Swimming meets that have been issued a written meet sanction or a meet approval; b. Swimming practices, dry land training activities and learn to swim programs where all swimmers and/or participants are members of United States Swimming, Inc. and which are conducted under the direct and active supervision of a member coach; c. United States Swimming, Inc. Swim-A-Thons ®; d. Approved social events and approved fund raising activities; e. Swimming Tryouts. Meet sanction is defined as a permit that has been issued by a Local Swimming Committee to a I JS Swimming, inc. group member to conduct a meet in conformance with all United States Swimming, Inc. rules. Meet approval is defined as a permit issued by a Local Swimming Committee for meets conducted in conformance with United States Swimming, Inc. technical rules in which both member and non members may compete. Member coach is defined as a coach member of United States Swimming, Inc. who has complied with safety training required by United States Swimming, Inc. Approved social events and approved fund raising activities are events and activities for which an Additional Named Insured has received approval from Risk Management Services, Inc. Swimming Tryouts are defined as swimming practices where a swimmer(s) who is not and who has never been a member of United States Swimming, Inc. participates with a United States Swimming, inc. club or seasonal club, for a period not to exceed thirty consecutive days in a twelve month period to determine the swimmer's interest in becoming a member of United States Swimming, Inc. Dry land training activities are defined as weight training, running, calisthenics, exercise, machine training and any other activity for which an Additional Named Insured has received approval from Risk Management Services, Inc. NOTE: THIS ATTACHMENT DOES NOT CHANGE, MODIFY OR NEGATE ANY POLICY TERMS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND/OR EXCLUSIONS OF THE ACTUAL POLICY. ATTACHMENT TO USA SWIMMING CERTIFICATE POLICY NUMBER: 390-4890 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY. ADDITIONAL INSUREDS - BLANKET OWNERS AND/OR LESSORS OF PREMISES The policy is amended to include as an Additional Insured any person or organization of the type designated below, and as evidenced by a certificate of insurance issued to the Additional Insured by us or on our behalf, but only with respect to liability arising out of insured activities by a Named Insured or an Additional Named Insured. Additional Insured is defined as owners and/or lessors of premises leased, rented or loaned to a Named Insured or an Additional Named Insured. The insurance aftbrded with respect to an Additional Insured by this endorsement is subject to the following additional exclusions: a. This insurance applies only to an occurrence which takes place while the Named Insured or Additional Named Insured is utilizing the premises; b. This insurance does not apply to an occurrence arising out of or related to structural alterations, new constriction or demolition operations performed by or on behalf of an Additional Insured; c. This insurance does not apply to an occurrence arising out of or related to any design defect or maintenance of the premises by or on behalf of an Additional Insured; d. This insurance does not apply to any occurrence which is caused by the negligence of the Additional Insured. Effective Date: The effective date of this endorsement shall be the issue date of the certificate to which it is attached. NOTE: THIS ATTACHMENT DOES NOT CHANGE, MODIFY OR NEGATE ANY POLICY TERMS, PROVISIONS, CONDITIONS AND/OR EXCLUSIONS OF THE ACTUAL POLICY. /S SOUTH BAY AQUATICS 24 HOUR RELAY FUNDRAISER WIIERE: National City Municipal Pool WIIEN: July 3, 5:00 p.m. - July 4, 5:00 p.m. PURPOSE: Fundraiser to support South 13ay Aquatics with a portion of the proceeds donated to the Challenged Athletes Foundation FORMAT: Each Relay consists of 12 swimmers. Each swimmer swims 2 1 hour sessions 12 hours apart. Each swimmer must raise a minimum of $250 to be eligible. Each swimmer must be 11 years of age or older. TEAM S I l PPORT: Provide food and drink for all participants throughout the event. Provide a lifeguard for the entire 24 hours. Provide a professional medical person on site for the entire 24 hours. Provide professional security from 6:00 p.m. July 3 -- 6:00 a.rn. July 4 Provide shelter for sleeping throughout the night. Provide awards for promoting increased participation and fundraising incentives. PARTICIPATION GOAL: 2 SBA teams and 2 teams invited from another club and I team supporting the Challenged Athletes Foundation COS'i': $300 Per Relay 'l.'eam to cover expenses. All other proceeds go to participating clubs The goal of this fundraising event is to raise money for the South Bay Aquatics Swim Team and the Challenged Athletes Foundation. Some of the funds raised would be put towards an account to purchase Starting Platforms for the National City Pool_ When the City of National City renovated the facility it brought the pool up to standards to be able to host t.JSA Swimming Sanctioned events, but the upgrade did not include starting platforms needed to conduct events. Starting Platfonns for the type of anchors installed will cost about $25,000. South Bay Aquatics wants to host swim meets in the National City Pool in the future that would bring people from all over San Diego County and the Southwestern United States to National City. There will be 50 — 100 athletes participating in this event. The event will last 24 hours, but athletes and support staff are not required to be present throughout the entire event. There will be a "Lock -in" period during the late night and early morning hours when athletes will not be able to outside the locked venue. A private Security company will be contracted from 6:00 p.m. July 3 — 6:00 a.m. July 4 to insure the safety of all participants and support staff. During the event we will have portable "Pop Up" lents on deck for the participants to be sheltered and would also want the locker rooms and main lobby available for use. A Professional medical person will be on location during the entire 24 hour period. Parent volunteers will be at the event the entire 24 hours providing food, drink and support for the needs of the participants. We will contact a National City service organization to give them an opportunity to host a fundraising Pancake Breakfast at the event. on July 4. "1.'o get recognition for this special event we will be contacting local radio and TV stations to do live remote broadcasts from the event to promote both our fundraising efforts and the City of National City. South Bay Aquatics feels this event would be a beneficial and worthy event for many reasons. This event would support South Bay Aquatics and the Challenged Athletes Foundation financially, it would continue efforts to upgrade the National City Pool facility so it can be used for competitive events, it will promote aquatics in the City of National City and it will be a fun, positive and healthy event for our swimmers. City of National City, California COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 03, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 (-ITEM TITLE RATIFICATIONS OF EXPENDITURES OF THE CDC: EXPENDITURES FO\ THE PERIOD OF 06/01/07 THROUGH 06/14/07 OF $783,854.61 Rizza A. Dela Cuadra PREPARED BY Accountant 619-336-4265 EXPLANATION See attached report. DEPARTMENT CDC— Finance Environmental Review ✓ N/A Approved by: Financial Statement Tess Limfueco, Finance Director Total expenditures for the period of 06/01/07 THROUGH 06/14/07 amount to $783,854.61 Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION RATIFY EXPENSES BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Ratification of Expenditures for the period 06/01/07 through 06/14/07 A-200 (9/80) Pa ee FOR MEETING OF JUI.X 03, 2007 RATIFICATION OF EXPENDITURES FOR PERIOD: 06/01 - 14/07 Desert tion Chk No Amount CDC BRAD RAULSTON CORPORATE EXPRESS INC DURRAINK FEDEX JEFF KA'l'Z ARCHITECTURE MORELAND & ASSOCIATES, INC. PETTY CASI I — CDC PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO COUNTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO El.ECI'RIC RAILWAY SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC SWI:I's'I'WATER AUTHORITY CDBG COMMUNITY YOUTH NUTRITION Al PARTY RENTALS CALIFORNIA BAKING CO. CENTRAL MEAT & PROVISION JOSI?PII WEBB FOODS MANEL SANCHE7. MCGUIRE DISTRIBUTION MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE PADRE JANITORIAL. SUPPLIES, INC PRO —EDGE KNIFE SIERRA SPRINGS SYSCO SAN DIEGO HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS FEDEX UNIFIED INDUSTRIES, INC. PAYROLL. MILEAGE REIMB—CRA INST(ONI'ARIO) OFFICE SUPPLIES BUSINESS CARDS—REYNOSO DOMESTIC MAIL TRANSPORTATION NC PLAYHOUSE ON PLAZA —MAR 2007 FINANCE CONSULTING REPLENISHMENT OF PETTY CASII NCB S'1'REETSCAPE IMPROVEMENT RECORDING FEES FOR RECONVEYANCE MAINTENANCE ON 922 W 23R1) UTIL11'II. S AT 500 E PLAZA BLVD UTILITIES AT 1820 G AVE SUBTOTAL — CDC: CDBG REIMB CLAIM FOR FY06-07 SUBTOTAL—CDBG: LINEN SUPPLIES —ROYAL BLUE NCNP FOOD NCNP FOOD NCNP FOOD/CONSUMABLES MILEAGE. REIMB FOR MAY 07 NCNI' FOOD NCNP LINEN SUPPLIES NCNP JANITORIAL SUPPLIES NCNP SHARPENING SERVICES NCNP WATER SERVICES S NCNP FOOD SUBTOTAL - NUTRITION TOTAL -GENERAL FUND MANUAL PAYMENTS DOMESTIC MAIL TRANSPORTATION S8 OFFICE SUPPLIES TOTAL — SECTION 8: 17153 $ 113.11 17142 720.38 17143 23.32 17144 17.52 17136 9,750.00 17148 6,202.13 17150 177.15 17152 88,948.63 17154 285.00 17137 2,500.00 17155 387.80 17158 63.37 $109,188.41 17141 $ 1,666.67 $ 1,666.67 17138 $ 250.38 17139 295.10 17140 2,685.09 17145 5,262.64 17156 57.72 17146 939.65 17147 138.42 17149 1,622.39 17151 40.00 17157 37.50 17159 5,245.85 10355 10356 $ 16,574.74 $127,429.82 $ 573,705.86 28.37 152.00 $ 573,886.23 PPE 06/30/07 TOTAL — ADMINISTRATIVE REVOLVING FUND: $ 82,538.56 S 82,538.56 TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS: $ 783,854.61 City of National City, California COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT 14 MEETING DATE My 19007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 1- ITEM TITLE Approve a Subordination Agreement with Pacific View Estates, LI.0 for a 49-unit single family project located at 1125, 1251, and 1311 East Division Street in National City, CA, and authorizing the Chairman to execute said Agreement PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Xavier Del Valle, x4279 Community Development Commission Senior Project Manager EXPLANATION In November 2005, Pacific View Estates, LLC and the Community Development Commission of National City (CDC) entered into Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for the development of 49 single family homes at 1125, 1251, and 1311 East Division Street. The transaction included the sale of the CDC -owned parcel located at 1125 East Division Street to the developer in exchange for the development of 5 affordable units for low income households (80% AMI), and a note in the amount of $810,000 in favor of the CDC. The note, which is secured by a deed of trust, shall convert to first time home loans upon completion of the affordable units. The first time home buyer loans shall be made available to the buyers of the affordable units. Pursuant to the DDA, the CDC note and deed of trust shall be subordinated to any construction deed of trust in the form acceptable to the CDC in its reasonable discretion. Tonight's action is to consider the subordination of the CDC note and deed of tnist to the note and deed of trust in favor of Temecula Valley Bank, N.A., the developer's construction lender. % Environmental Review CEQA is not applicable Financial Statement The transaction for the above referenced project required the developer to execute a note in the amount of $810,000 in favor of the CDC. The note, which is secured by a deed of trust, shall convert to first time home loans upon completion of the affordable units. STAFF RECOMMENDATION CDC approve a Subordination Agreement with Pacific View Estates, LLC for a 49-unit single family project located at 1125, 1251, and 1311 East Division Street in National City, CA, and authorizing the Chairman to execute said Agreement. I ATTACHMENTS 1.Resolution 2.Subordination Agreement L Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2007 — 157 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE A SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC VIEW ESTATES, LLC FOR A 49 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY PROJECT LOCATED 1125, 1251, AND 1311 EAST DIVISION STREET WHEREAS, in November 2005, Pacific View Estates, LLC and the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (CDC) entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) for the development of 49 single family units at 1125, 1251, and 1311 East Division Street; and WHEREAS, the transaction included the sale of the CDC -owned parcel located at 1125 East Division Street to Pacific View Estates in exchange for the development of five affordable units for low income households, and a note in the amount of $810,000 in favor of the CDC; and WHEREAS, the note, which is secured by a deed of trust, shall convert to first time home loans upon completion of the affordable units; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the DDA, the CDC note and deed of trust shall be subordinated to any construction deed of trust in the form acceptable to the CDC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Community Development Commission of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Chairman to execute a Subordination Agreement with Pacific View Estates, LLC for a 49-unit single family project located at 1125, 1251, and 1311 East Division Street. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of July 2007. Ron Morrison, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Raulston, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III Legal Counsel RECORDING REQUESTED BY: WHEN RECORDED MAII.. TO: Temecula Valley Bank 301 N. Magnolia Avenue, Suite 201 El Cajon, Ca. 92020 ATTN: P. Estrada SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT NOTICE: 'i'H IS SI TBORDIN ATION AGREEMENT RESULTS IN YOUR SECURITY INTEREST IN ]'HE PROPERTY BECOMING SUBJECT TO ANI) OF LOWER PRIORITY THAN THE LIEN OF SOME OTHER OR LATER SECURITY INSTRUMENT. THIS AGREEMENT made this 19 day of June, 2007, by Pacific View Estates, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, owner of the land hereinafter referred to as "Owner", and The Community Development Commission of the City National City present owner and holder of the deed of trust and note first hereinafter described and hereinafter referred to as "Beneficiary"; WITNESSETH THAT WHEREAS, Pacific View Estates, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company did execute a deed of trust,' dated November 29, 2005, to The Community Development Commission of the City National City, as trustee, covering: LOTS 1 THROUGH 56 OF PACIFIC VIEW ESTATES CASE NO. S-2004-16, IN TIIE CITY OF NATIONAI. CITY, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 15556, FILED IN TIIE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MAY 29, 2007 to secure a note in the sum of $810,000.00, dated November 29, 2005, in favor of Pacific View Estates, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, which deed of trust was recorded December 29, 2005, in book 2005-1117857 page --, Official Records of said county; and WHEREAS, Owner has executed, or is about to execute a deed of trust and note in the sum of $9,475,000.00, dated June 19, 2006, in favor of Temecula Valley Bank, N.A., hereinafter referred to as "Lender", payable with interest and upon the terms and conditions described therein, which deed of trust is to be recorded concurrently herewith; and WHEREAS, it is a condition precedent to obtaining said loan that said deed of trust last above mentioned shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge upon the land hereinbefore described, prior and superior to the lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned; and PAC& 1 WHEREAS, Lender is willing to make said loan provided the deed of trust securing the same is a Lien or charge upon the above described property prior and superior to the lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned and provided that Beneficiary will specifically and unconditionally subordinate the lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender; and WHEREAS, it is to the mutual benefit of the parties hereto that Lender rnakc such loan to Owner; and Beneficiary is willing that the deed of trust securing the same shall, when recorded, constitute a lien or charge upon said land which is unconditionally prior and superior to the lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits accruing to the patties hereto and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which consideration is hereby acknowledged, and in order to induce Lender to make the loan above referred to, it is hereby declared, understood and agreed as follows: (1) That said deed of trust securing said note in favor of Lender, and any renewals or extensions thereof, shall unconditionally be and remain at all times a lien or charge on the property therein described, prior and superior to the lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned. (2) That Lender would not make its loan above described without this subordination agreement. (3) That this agreement shall be the whole and only agreement with regard to the subordination of the lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and shall supersede and cancel, but only insofar as would affect the priority between the deeds of trust hcreinbefore specifically described, any prior agreements as to such subordination including, but not limited to, those provisions, if any contained in the deed of trust above mentioned, which provide for the subordination of the lien or charge thereof to another deed or deeds of trust or to another mortgage or mortgages. Beneficiary declares, agrees and acknowledge that (a) He consents to and approves (i) all provisions of the note and deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to, and (ii) all agreements, including but not limited to any loan or escrow agreements, between Owner and Lender for the disbursement of the proceeds of Lender's loan; (b) Lender in making disbursements pursuant to any such agreement is under no obligation or duty to, nor has Lender represented that it will, see to the application of such proceeds by the person or persons to whom Lender disburses such proceeds and any application or use of such proceeds for purposes other than those provided for in such agreement or agreements shall not defeat the subordination herein made in whole or in part; (c) He intentionally and unconditionally waives, relinquishes and subordinates the lien or charge of the deed of trust first above mentioned in favor of the lien or charge upon said land of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to and understands that in reliance PAGF. 2 upon, and in consideration of, this waiver, relinquishment and subordination specific loans and advances are being and will be made and, as part and parcel thereof, specific monetary and other ohiieations are being and will he entered into which would not be made or entered into but for said reliance upon this waiver, relinquishment and subordination; and (d) An endorsement has been placed upon the note secured by the deed of trust first above mentioned that said deed of trust has by this instrument been subordinated to the lien or charge of the deed of trust in favor of Lender above referred to. NOTICE: THIS SUBORDINATION AGREEMENT CONTAINS A PROVISION WHICII ALLOWS THE PERSON OBLIGATED ON YOUR REAL PROPERTY SECURITY TO OBTAIN A LOAN A PORTION OF WHICH MAY HE EXPENDED FOR OTHER PURPOSES THAN IMPROVEMENT OF THE LAND. The Community Development Commission of the City of National City BY: ITS: BY: ITS: Pacific View Estates, LLC:, A California Limited Liability Company BY: National Housing Fund Inc., A California Corporation, Managing Member BY: Philip M. Chodur, President Beneficiary Owner (All signatures must be acknowledged) PAGE 3 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of On before me, Date personally appeared Place Notary Seal Above Name and Tile of Olfirxr (e 9., Jane Doe, Notary PuMic'I Name(s) of Signer(s) e rl personally known to me 171 (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Signature of Notary Public Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: - Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: _ n Individual L' Corporate Officer — Title(s): Partner — C7 Limited f l General - Attorney in Fact J Trustee rl Guardian or Conservator ! Other: Signer Is Representing: if.) 2u0(3 Nat onai Nulaty RIGHT TH OF S UMBPRINT GNER lop of thumb hole Signer's Name: I—' Individual I • Corporate Officer — Title(s): J Partner — Li Limited D General 1I Attorney in Fact ,J Trustee I Guardian or Conservator U Other Signer Is Representing: RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumb here :'.iv t:` yi•:as: t.:-�J�-..F<-�.:'%JT?.iT.,�.v�a+'t� alien • 0350 De Soto Ave , PO Vox 2402 • Chat5'nonh, CA 9137:.-2402 Item Nu. 5907 HeviJm. Call kI-Free 1-e O-876.6827 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of _. On before me, Date personally appeared _ Place Notary Seal Alcove Name and Tnle of ()thew (en, 'Jane Doe, Notary Pubhr.') Naniep:) of Sgner(s) 7, personally known to me U (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. OPTIONAL Signature of Notary Pithlir•. Though the information below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another documetd. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: __ Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: C Individual FL Corporate Officer — Title(s): U Partner — 1 i Limited 11 General U Attorney in Fact G Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator 71 Other: Signer Is Representing: _. RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER Top of thumt, tic,e Number of Pages: Signer's Name: - Individual ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): P. Partner — U Limited 1 _ General 11 Attorney in Fact l _ Trustee D. Guardian or Conservator L: Other: Signer Is Representing: . RIGHT THUMBPRINT OF SIGNER lop rr thumb here Eo 06NatonalN.neSet Ae PO Fua2c»�� h 313. 4 2c� No sYn7 Ri civ 1 00-8/ 827 ?f1A6 National Notary Association • 9350 De Seto Ave. P.O Rux 24C2 • Chatsworth. CA 91373�ZdC2 Item No S90I NeoiJuc Call Toll Free 7-OW-L'lG(iFS27 City of National City, California COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 3, 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 �TEM TITLE A resolution of the Community Development Commission approving the Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project. PREPARED BY �kr DEPARTMENT Patricia Beard, Redeye opment Manager Community Development Commission (ext 4255) EXPLANATION The Community Development Commission ("CDC") is proposing an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project ("2007 Amendment") to: extend the CDC's authority to acquire property through eminent domain for certain commercial and industrial zoned properties until 2019, change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes to include all residential land uses, to modify the redevelopment plan text as it pertains to redevelopment actions and permitted land uses, and revise the Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvement Projects exhibit. The City Council and the CDC held a joint public hearing on June 19, 2007, where testimony was provided on the 2007 Amendment and Negative Declaration. Since the Public Hearing testimony did not question the process the CDC used to conduct an environmental review of the 2007 Amendment, staff is recommending that the CDC certify the Negative Declaration prior to approving the 2007 Amendment and recommending that the City Council adopt the 2007 Amendment. Environmental Review A negative declaration has been prepared in accordance with the CEQA. Staff is submitting the Negative Declaration to the CDC for their consideration and approval. Financial Statement If the 2007 Amendment is adopted by the City Council, a fee of $1,800 shall be paid to the County Clerk of the County of San Diego to file a notice of determination. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Background Report 2. CDC Resolution No._ -Negative Declaration as Attachment A to the resolution Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION 2007 — 158 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED 2007 AMENDMENT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City ("City Council") and the Community Development Commission of the City of National City ("CDC") did duly pass and adopt a Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project ("Plan"); and WHEREAS, the CDC has formulated an amendment to the Plan ("2007 Amendment") which would: • Extend the existing time limit, not to exceed 12 years from the adoption of the amendment of the Plan, for commencement of eminent domain proceedings to acquire, as a last resort, vacant property (as defined in National City Municipal Code Section 7.06.20), and all commercial and industrial zoned properties in those areas that are currently subject to eminent domain authority within the National City Redevelopment Project Area; • Add a provision to allow the CDC, if it makes certain findings, to pay all or part of the value of the land and the costs of the installation and construction of any publicly -owned building, facility, structure or other improvement within or without the Project Area pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33445; • Modify Section VIl (c) of the Redevelopment Plan to allow used auto and truck sales when part of a new vehicle dealership and located on land within the Transportation Center District, as defined in the Plan; • Change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D of the Redevelopment Plan) to include all residential land uses; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration was prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et. seq.) on the proposed 2007 Amendment ("Negative Declaration") in the form attached hereto as Attachment "A"; and WHEREAS, a notice of the availability of the Negative Declaration for public review and comment was published on June 8, 2007 in the San Diego Union -Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of National City; and, WHEREAS, on June 19, 2007, the CDC and City Council held a Joint Public Hearing on the proposed 2007 Amendment, and received and considered all evidence and testimony pertaining thereto; and WHEREAS, it is mandatory that the CDC certify its consideration of and approve the Negative Declaration prior to the adoption of the 2007 Amendment by an ordinance of the City Council. Resolution No. 2007 — 158 July 3, 2007 Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Community Development Commission of the City of National City hereby finds and determines that there is not substantial evidence that the proposed 2007 Amendment will have a significant effect on the environment, and that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City based upon the whole record of the Negative Declaration, including the Initial Study contained therein, any comments received, and evidence and testimony received at the Joint Public Hearing on the Negative Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Community Development Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration prepared for the 2007 Amendment and hereby approves the Negative Declaration. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Secretary of the Community Development Commission is authorized to file, in cooperation with the City Clerk, a joint Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego following adoption by the City Council of the ordinance adopting the 2007 Amendment. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 3`d day of July 2007. Ron Morrison, Chairman ATTEST: Brad Raulston, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III Legal Counsel Background Report Background: The City Council of the City of National City ("City Council") and the Community Development Commission ("CDC") held a joint public hearing on the 2007 Amendment on June 19, 2007. CDC staff and consultants presented the reasons for the proposed 2007 Amendment, and the City Council/CDC received testimony regarding the 2007 Amendment and the Negative Declaration for the 2007 Amendment ("Negative Declaration"). CDC staff was then directed to prepare written responses to written objections and to present them at the July 3, 2007, joint meeting. In order to provide staff with adequate time to prepare the written responses, City Council consideration of the written responses will be scheduled for the July 10, 2007, joint meeting of the City Council and CDC. At this meeting the City Council and the CDC will consider resolutions approving the Negative Declaration. The CDC has followed the appropriate environmental review process and the City Council and the CDC are to consider the certification of the Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Amendment prior to adopting an ordinance approving the 2007 Amendment. The Negative Declaration, along with the Initial Study, was prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") (Califomia Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et. seq.). The Negative Declaration evaluated the potential environmental impacts and found that the proposed 2007 Amendment would not present any adverse environmental impacts. As site specific implementation projects are considered, additional environmental review will be conducted. This review will evaluate the anticipated environmental impacts associated with the project proposal. In accordance with CEQA provisions, the Negative Declaration was available for public review and comment for a period of twenty (20) days. The review period commenced on June 7, 2007, and ended on June 27, 2007. A notice of intent to adopt the Negative Declaration and its availability for public review and comment was published on June 8, 2007, in the San Diego Union -Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of National City. In addition, an opportunity for public testimony on the Negative Declaration was provided at the June 19, 2007, joint public hearing. The Negative Declaration was made available to the CDC and the City Council prior to the joint public hearing as an attachment to the Report to City Council and is available now as Attachment A to CDC Resolution No. . By adopting the attached resolution, the CDC is approving the Negative Declaration for the 2007 Amendment and authorizing the Secretary of the CDC, in cooperation with the City Clerk, to file a Joint Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego following the adoption of an ordinance approving the 2007 Amendment. 1 Cornnwnity Development Commission of National City 1243 National City Boulevard Attachment A National City, California 91950-3312 Telephone (619) 336-4250 Fax (619) 336-4286 CALIFORNIA F,NVIRONMF.NTAL QUALITY ACT Redevelopment Plan Amendment 2007 - Negative Declaration A. INTRODUCTION The Community Development. Commission of the City of National City (the "CDC") prepareda Negative Declaration for the proposed 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment to extend the authority to use eminent. domain. The CDC proposes to extend the CDC's existing authority to acquire property, as a last resort, through eminent domain to vacant property. (as defined in the National City Municipal Code Section 7.06.20), and all commercial and industrial zoned properties in those areas which are currently subject to eminent domain authority within the National City Redevelopment Project Area. The current exemption for single family residences would he expanded so that all housing uses, whether single-family or multi -family, are specifically excluded from the use of eminent domain. The Commission currently has the authority to acquire property through eminent domain until July .I8, 2007 in the following areas: • Properties located immediately east and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and the south City limits. • Properties located immediately west and adjacent to National City Boulevard, between Division Street and State Route 54. ■ Properties located immediately west and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately south and adjacent to Civic Center Drive, between Interstate 5 and National City Boulevard. • Properties located immediately north and south and adjacent to 8th Street, between Interstate 5 and "D" Avenue. • Properties west of Interstate 5, excepting the San Diego Unified Port District property. • Specific properties located immediately southwest of the intersection of Plaza Boulevard and highland Avenue. This amendment will extend the Commission's authority to acquire property through eminent domain within these areas until 2019. The 2007 Amendment also includes the addition and modification of redevelopment plan text as it pertains to redevelopment actions and uses permitted in the project area. As proposed the amendment would add a provision for the CDC to pay all or part of the value of the land and the cost of the installation and construction of any publicly owned building, facility, structure, or other improvement within or without the Project Area pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33445. The 2007 Amendment would modify Section VIl (c) of the Redevelopment Plan, thus allowing for used auto and truck sales when part of a new vehicle dealership and located on land within the Transportation Center district. The 2007 Amendment will also change the current exclusion of eminent domain on single-family homes (Exhibit D) to include all residential land uses, as well as revising Exhibit C "Public Facilitiesllnfrastructurc Improvement Projects". No other changes to the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project are included in this amendment. Community Development Commission of National City — Negative Declaration Page 1 Extension of the Authority to Ilse Eminent Domain The Negative Declaration for the 2007 Amendment evaluated the potential environmental impacts that could occur with making the proposed amendments to the existing Redevelopment Plan. The Negative Declaration was mailed for a 20-day public review period beginning June 7, 2007 and is scheduled to end on June 27, 2007. Comments on the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment Negative Declaration should be submitted during this public review period. The Negative Declaration will be considered for approval July 3, 2007. The commercial and industrial properties within the Project Area that are now subject to the use of eminent domain are shown on the attached map. The change to the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment to extend the eminent domain time limit in the existing project area, revising Exhibit D to exclude all residential land uses, revising the transportation center section and revising Exhibit C — public facilities and infrastnicture is now referred to as the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment, which reflects the stated change. B. CEQA PROVISIONS As stated above, a Negative Declaration was prepared for the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA Guidelines). The revision to the 2007 Amendment is now reflected by the 2007 Amendment, which did not cause or generate any significant effects. C. ENVIRONMENTAL, DETERMINATION The Negative Declaration did not identify any significant or adverse environmental impacts associated with the extension of the eminent domain time limit in the existing project area, revising Exhibit D to exclude all residential land uses, revising the transportation center section and revising Exhibit C public facilities and infrastructure. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5(c)(2), the Negative Declaration is adequate in its analysis of the 2007 Redevelopment Plan Amendment. Community Development Commission of National City Negative Declaration Extension of the Authority to Use Eminent Domain Page 2 Community Development Commission COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE _ 7/3/ , 2007 AGENDA ITEM NO 16 (ITEM TITLE HOME Investments Partnership Act (HOME) Program Income Update and Allocation Process PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Xavier Vclasco andZ Community Development Commission Rosemary Toscano ,( City Manager's Office EXPLANATION Staff has identified up to $1.5 million in HOME Program Income. The HOME Program Income was generated over the past 10-15 years from HOME entitlement funds originally provided to National City residents in the form of loans for participation in either the City's Residential Rehabilitation Programs or the First-time Homebuyer Program. These loans continue to be paid back to the Community Development Commission, often times with interest. It is a requirement of the I-IOME Program that all Program Income generated from the HOME funds be utilized to fund only eligible HOME program activities; and that the City must adhere to its adopted public participation process for the allocation of such funds. Next steps include: • Public Hearing #1 - Discussion of Eligible Program Activities & Activities Recommended for Funding • 30-I)ay Public Review/Comment Period for the Proposed Activities • Public Hearing #2 — Final Citizen Input/Comments and Council Recommendations Environmental Review Not applicable ater : ofcm A Financial Statement: Up to S1.5 million to fund eligible HOME Program activities. Account No STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Community Development Commission Board accept and file this report. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. L None A-200 (9/80)