The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008 01-08 CC CDC ADJ AGENDA PKTAgenda Of An Adjourned Regular Meeting - National City City Council / Community Development Commission of the City of National City Council Chambers Civic Center 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California Regular Meeting - Tuesday — January 8, 2008 — 6:00 P.M. Open '.Co The Public Please complete a request to speak form prior to the commencement of the meeting and submit it to the City Clerk. It is the intention of your City Council and Community Development Commission (CDC) to be receptive to your concerns in this community. Your participation in local government will assure a responsible and efficient City of National City. We invite you to bring to the attention of the City Manager/Executive Director any matter that you desire the City Council or Community Development Commission Board to consider. We thank you for your presence and wish you to know that we appreciate your involvement. ROLL CALL Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by Mayor Ron Morrison Public Oral Communications (Three -Minute Time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to state law, items requiring Council or Community Development Commission action must be brought back on a subsequent Council or Community Development Commission Agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency or urgent nature. Upon request, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (619) 336-4228 to request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24-hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Spanish audio interpretation is provided during Council and Community Development Commission Meetings. studio headphones are available in the lobby at the beginning of the meetings. Audio interpretacion en espanof se proporciona durante sesiones del Consejo Municipal. Los audiofonos estan disponibles en el pasillo al principio de la junta. I // Council Requests That All Cell Phones And Pagers Be Turned Off During City Council Meetings OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDAS AND MINUTES MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH OUR WEBSITE AT www.ci.natlonalcity.ca CITY COUNCIUCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 1/8/08- Page 2 CITY COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine or non controversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council/Community Development Commission of December 18, 2007. (City Clerk) 2. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving a Two - Phase Salary Adjustment for employees in the Confidential Group: 3% cost of living adjustment effective retroactively to January 1, 2008 and 4% increase in base salary effective January 1, 2009. (Human Resources) 3. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City modifying the Contribution Rates to the Public Employees' Retirement System by decreasing the City's contribution and adding a Member Contribution Paid by the City of National City's Confidential Employee Group. (Human Resources) 4. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving an Amendment to an Agreement with EDAW to increase the contract amount by $16,250 and authorizing the Mayor to execute the Agreement for the preparation of the Westside Specific Plan. (Case File No. 2007-34 GP, ZC, SP) (Planning) 5. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security and the City of National City regarding the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) Grant Program. (Fire) CITY COUNCILJCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 1/8/08- Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 6. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an Amendment to the Agreement with Computer Protection Technology, Inc. in the amount of $8,683.20 for the upgrade of the Data Center Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) System at City Hall. (MIS) 7. Warrant Register #23 for the period of 11/29/07 through 12/04/07 in the amount of $1,045,937.13. (Finance) 8. Warrant Register #24 for the period of 12/05/07 through 12/11/07 in the amount of $756,949.66. (Finance) PUBLIC HEARINGS 9. Public Hearing — Appeal of a Planning Commission denial of a Planned Development Permit and Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect for a three-story office building including retail space and structured parking on an approximately 1-acre vacant lot on the north side of East 8th street, west of V Avenue. (Applicant: Kamel Zayet) (Case File 2007-08 PD) (Planning) 10. Public Hearing — Fiscal Year 2008-2009 Funding Cycle for the CDBG and HOME Programs. (Grants and Housing Department) 11. Public Hearing for the removal of the public telephone located at 115 E. 8th Street that is encroaching into the City reserved Right -of -Way. (Engineering) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 12. Warrant Register for the period of 11/30/07 through 12/13/07 in the amount of $1,383,191.51.. (Community Development Commission/Finance) CITY COUNCIUCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 1/8/08- Page 4 NEW BUSINESS 13. Submission of the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 Annual Report of financial transactions and status and use of Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (HCD Report) to the State Controller. (Finance) STAFF REPORTS 14. Verbal Update on Branding and Marketing Efforts. (Economic Development) 15. Verbal Update on Redevelopment Projects. (Community Development) MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT Dispense of the City Council and Community Development Commission meeting of January 15, 2008. Next Adjoumed Regular City Council and Community Development Commission Meeting - Tuesday — January 22, 2008 - 6:00 p.m. — Council Chamber - National City. TAPE RECORDINGS OF CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OPMENT COMMISSION MEETINGS ARE AVAILABLE FOR SALE IN THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ITEM #1 1 /8/08 Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council/Community Development Commission of December 18, 2007 (City Clerk) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .FETING DATES 1-8-08 AGENDA ITEM NO. 2 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City Approving a Two -Phase Salary Adjustment Adjustment for Employees in the Confidential Group: 3% Cost of Living Adjustment Effective Retroactively to January 1, 2008 and 4% Increase in Rase Salary Effective January 1, 2009 PREPARED BY la() )0 - itl V j DEPARTMENT Stacey Stevenson (336-4308) Human Resources Director EXPLANATION While not a formal bargaining group, the City of National City's Confidential employee group informally negotiates wages and benefits with the Department of Human Resources (as a representative of the City Manager). While such negotiations are distinguished from other general employees, wage and benefit adjustments for Confidential employees are typically in -line with those of the National City Municipal Employees' Association (NCMEA). In July, 2007, the City Council approved a two year contract with NCMEA that included a 3% cost of living increase January 1, 2008 and a 4% increase in base salary January 1, 2009. In December, 2007, the Confidential employees accepted a two-phase increase consistent with that of NCMEA with the same concession: effective January 1, 2008, Confidential employees agree to make a one percent (1%) contribution to their individual retirement K.....accounts commencing January 1, 2008 and an additional one percent (1%) commencing January 1, 2009. The retirement contribution will be addressed in a separate Council item. K..... Environmental Review V NIA Financial Statement This action will result in estimated costs for Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and Fiscal Year 2008-2009 of $30,529 (FY 2007-2008: $6794 & FY 2008-2009: $23,735) for the pay increases. Account No. 001-2501 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. LResolution A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A TWO-PHASE SALARY ADJUSTMENT FOR EMPLOYEES IN THE CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE GROUP: 3% COST OF LIVING INCREASE EFFECTIVE RETROACTIVELY TO JANUARY 1, 2008, AND 4% INCREASE IN BASE SALARY EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2009 (Unrepresented Group) WHEREAS, while not a formal bargaining group, the City of National City's Confidential Employee Group, informally negotiates wages and benefits; and WHEREAS, although such negotiations are distinguished from other general employees, wage and benefits adjustments for Confidential employees are typically in -line with those of the National City Municipal Employees' Association (MEA); and WHEREAS, in July 2007, the City Council approved a two year contract with the MEA that included a 3% cost of living increase beginning January 1, 2008, and a 4% increase in base salary beginning January 1, 2009. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby approves a two-phase salary adjustment for the employees in the Confidential Employee Group; 3% cost of living increase effective beginning January 1, 2008, and a 4°I0 increase in base salary beginning January 1, 2009. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that health and dental and other befits for the Confidential Employee Group will be addressed in the near future. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is directed to allocate necessary funds to implement the aforementioned two-phase salary adjustment for the Confidential Employee Group PASSED and ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT EETING DATE 1-8-08 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 !TEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City Modifying the Contribution Rates to the Public Employees' Retirement System by Decreasing the City's Contribution and Adding a Member Contribution Paid by the City of National City's Confidential Employee group. PREPARED BY `01- 11) (ob a i-,um-to-/S Stacey Stevenson (336-4308) Director DEPARTMENT Human Resources EXPLANATION On October 16, 2007, consistent with the current labor agreement with the National City Municipal Employees' Association (NCMEA), the City Council approved a resolution amending the employee contribution to PERS for NCMEA represented employees to include a 1% contribution effective January 1, 2008 and an additional 1% effective January 1, 2009, reducing the Employer Paid Member Contribution paid by the City to six percent (6%) by January 1, 2009. In December, 2007, employees included in the Confidential group agreed to the same contribution schedule. To effect this provision for the Confidential employee group, pursuant to Government Code Section 20691, the City Council must amend the contract between the Board of Administration of PERS and the City Council by adopting a resolution specifying the plan change. Therefore, staff seeks a resolution reducing the Employer Paid Member Contribution to PERS for Confidential employees to seven percent (7%) effective January 1, 2008 and to six percent (6%) effective January 1, 2009. Environmental Review ✓ N/A Financial Statement "Pre' This action will result in a savings of $887 in fiscal year 2008 and $2,178 in fiscal year 2109. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend approval of resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Resolution A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY MODIFYING THE CONTRIBUTION RATES TO THE PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM BY DECREASING THE CITY'S CONTRIBUTION AND ADDING A MEMBER CONTRIBUTION PAID BY THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY'S CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE GROUP WHEREAS, the City Council has the authority to implement Government Code Section 20691; and WHEREAS, the City Council had a written labor agreement with the National City Municipal Employees' Association (MEA) that expired on December 31, 2006, which specifically provided for the MEA member contributions to be paid by the employer; and WHEREAS, the City Council ratified a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and the MEA for the period of January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2009, which included a reduction in the employer paid amount of the employee contribution; and WHEREAS, Govemment Code Section 20691 recognizes a contracting agency, such as the City Council, to periodically increase, reduce or eliminate the employer paid amount of the employee contribution; and WHEREAS, in December 2007, the City's Confidential Employee Group agreed to the same PERS contribution schedule; and WHEREAS, this resolution is consistent with Section 20691, and is adopted to reflect and commence the reduction in the employer paid contribution (EPMC) for all employees of the Confidential Employee Group; and WHEREAS, the City Council has identified the following conditions for the purpose of its election to pay EPMC: • This benefit shall apply to all employees of the Confidential Employee Group. This benefit shall consist of the City paying 8% through December 31, 2007, 7% from January 1, 2008, and 6% effective January 1, 2009, of the normal member contributions as EPMC. • The effective date of this Resolution shall be January 8, 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City elects to pay EPMC, as set forth above, for those employees of the Confidential Employee Group. -- Signature Page to Follow -- Resolution No. 2008 — January 8, 2008 • Page 2 PASSED and ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, 111 City Attorney City of National City, California City Council Aaenda Statement ,MEETING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 4 1ITEM TITLE A Resolution Approving an Amendment to an Agreement with EDAW to Increase the Contract Amount by $16,250 and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Agreement for the Preparation of the Westside Specific Plan. Case File No. 2007-34 GP, ZC, SP PREPARED BY Peggy Chapin, Principal Planner x4319\ EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Planning Department On August 3, 2004, the City Council authorized the preparation of the Westside Specific Plan at a cost of $176,675. Subsequently the scope or work was expanded and an additional $33,529 was authorized by the Council on February 28, 2006. The expanded scope of work included the consultant attending additional meetings and preparation and presentation for two community workshops. Since that time, the consultant also has conducted additional community outreach and presented the revised Westside Specific Plan at the October 30, 2007 Council workshop. These additional efforts were not included in the contract amendment. For these additional work efforts, the consultant has requested an amendment to the contract in the amount of $16,250. Environmental Review An Environmental Impact Report would he prepared upon completion of the draft Westside Specific Plan. Financial Statement The contact amendment is for $16,250. The total amount expended to date for the Westside Specific Plan is $210,204. Approval of this contact amendment would bring the total amount for the preparation of the Westside Specific Plan to $226,454. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION R� Adopt the Resolution. l� BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution L. 2. Letter from EDAW dated June 27, 2007 3. Amendment to Agreement A-200 (9/99) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND EDAW, INC. TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF WORK AT THE COST OF $16,250 IN CONNECTION WITH THE PREPARATION OF A SPECIFIC PLAN FOR THE CITY'S WESTSIDE AREA WHEREAS, the City and EDAW, Inc. entered into an Agreement on August 3, 2004 ("the Agreement") by the adoption of Resolution No. 2004-157 wherein EDAW, Inc. agreed to provide planning services for the preparation of a specific plan for the Westside area of National City; and WHEREAS, on February 28, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution 2006-37 approving an Amendment to Agreement with EDAW Inc. to expand the Scope of Work to include the consultant attending additional meetings and preparation and presentation for two community workshops; and WHEREAS, since that time, the consultant has conducted additional community outreach and presented the revised Westside Specific Plan at the October 30, 2007 City Council workshop. WHEREAS, the City and EDAW, Inc. desire to amend the Scope of Work for an additional cost of $16,250 to include the additional work performed by EDAW Inc. that was not included in the previous 2006 Amendment to Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute an Amendment to Agreement between the City and EDAW, Inc. to expand the Scope of Work to include the work performed by EDAW, Inc. in connection with the preparation of a specific plan for the City's Westside area. Said Amendment to Agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney EDAW Inc 1420 Kenner Boulevard, Suite 620, San Diego. California 92101 T 619 233.1454 F 619.233 0952 wmv.eduw.coin June 27, 2007 Ms. Peggy Chapin Principal Planner City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Subject: Request for Contract Amendment, Westside Specific Plan Dear Peggy, As documented in our April 12, 2007 memorandum to the City, for reasons outside of EDAW's control, our effort required to complete the Westside Specific Plan has exceeded the level of effort our original contract contemplated. As we have discussed, this letter is intended to provide a summary of those services and costs for which we are requesting a contract amendment. The efforts summarized herein do not include all of the efforts for which EDAW has expended additional effort for the Westside Specific Plan. However, as you know, we have always remained committed to the City and this project. For this reason, we are only requesting reimbursement for a portion of the additional costs we have incurred. Our original budget estimate anticipated completion of this contract within a 12-month period. We are currently on our 34th month of the contract. Recently, the City has reinitiated our work after us being on -hold for an approximate 3-month period. If we continue our work efforts diligently, and the public process moves smoothly without changes in approach, it is anticipated that our contract will be complete in 3% years. While we are excited to complete the project, the length of time that has passed since the initiation of the contract has resulted in additional costs in executing are work efforts, principally related to increases in labor costs. Since 2004, EDAW's labor costs, and thus our billing rates, have increased by 15 percent. While we completed efforts at higher labor costs in late 2005 and early 2006, we are limiting our request to the efforts necessary to complete Tasks D through E of our original contract (beginning with °Draft Specific Plan"), which includes efforts in the past 8 months and our future efforts. Costs for completion of these tasks were originally estimated at $ $35,980. Applying our labor cost increases to this amount, we are requesting $5,397 to address these increase costs. Our future invoices will use EDAW's 2007 Standard Billing Rates. In addition, we have attended many meetings that have been outside our scope of services. We are requesting reimbursement for six of these meetings. Recent meetings have been focused on integrating the Industrial Park project with the Westside project, working strategically to define a collective vision for the project, and continuing to discuss the appropriate level of CEQA review for the project. These are only our recent meetings. Historically, EDAW has attended many meetings, like these, that have been outside of our scope of services. We attended these meetings on good faith, some with the understanding that our contract would likely be amended to address additional work components, which did not come to fruition. Because EDAW has attended many more meetings than six in excess of our prior agreements, we feel this is a reasonable request. The cost of these meetings and associated support services (e.g., preparation and coordinating staff on changes in direction) is estimated at $10,800. Ms. Peggy Chapin Principal Planner City of National City Planning Department Page 2 We also feel it is important to note that, since the initiation of our contract, EDAW has interacted with four different project managers. Significant time has been expended to bring each new staff member up -to -speed, and to adjust our approach to meeting different individual expectations. A fee amendment is not requested for this effort. In sum, we request that the City amend our contract by $16,250. This would result in a total contract value of $226,401. We appreciate the City's consideration of our request. In Tight of the effort we have devoted to the project, and the commitment we have to the City, we feel it is modest. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely, Bobbette Biddutph, AICP Principal bobbette. biddulphaedaw.com cc: Brad Raulston, CDC Director Roger Post, Planning Director AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND EDAW, INC. This Amendment to Agreement is entered into this 8th day of January, 2008 by and between the City of National City, a municipal corporation ("THE CITY"), and EDAW, Inc. (the "CONTRACTOR"). A. B. RECITALS The CITY and the CONTRACTOR entered into an agreement on August 3, 2004 ("the Agreement") wherein the CONTRACTOR agreed to provide planning services for the preparation of a specific plan for the Westside area of National City. The parties desire to amend the Agreement to expand the Scope of Work to be performed pursuant to the Agreement, as set forth in the letter dated June 27, 2007 from Bobbette Biddulph, Principal, Project Director for EDAW, Inc. and to prepare and present the Westside Specific Plan land use plan at the Council Workshop of October 30, 2007 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement entered into on August 3, 2004 shall be amended by expanding the Scope of Work to be performed as described in said letter dated June 27, 2007 and the services performed for the Council workshop of October 30, 2007. The parties further agree that with the foregoing exception, each and every term and provision of the Agreement dated August 3, 2004 shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY EDAW, INC_ By; By: Ron Morrison, Mayor [3Sbbetttiddulph, AICP Principal EDAW, Inc. Rail Hrenko Vice -President EDAW, Inc. eueline Dompe President EDAW, Inc. APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attomey City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 5 MEETING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REGARDING THE URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE (UASI) GRANT PROGRAM PREPARED BY Walter Amedee t DEPARTMENT Fire Homeland Security Manager EXPLANATION This agreement documents roles, responsibilities, and expectations at the local, state, and federal levels and ensures that the City of National City, as a participant in the program, agrees to meet state and federal requirements. The UASI grant provides funding for equipment and training needed to respond to natural or man-made disasters or terrorism incidents that may occur in the San Diego urban area. Environmental Review I N/A Financial Statement No impact. Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends authorizing the Mayor to execute the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security and the City of National City regarding the Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant program. BOARD f COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. MOU between the City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security and the City of National City 2. Resolution A-200 (9/99) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REGARDING THE URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE (UASI) GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Urban Area Security Initiative ("UASI") grant program provides funding for equipment needed to respond to natural disasters or weapons of mass destruction terrorism incidents that may occur in the San Diego urban area; and WHEREAS, the City of National City is required to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security which documents the roles, responsibilities and expectations at the local, state and federal levels, and ensures that the City of National City, as a participant in the program, agrees to meet the state and federal requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security regarding Urban Area Security Initiative grant funding. Said Memorandum of Understanding is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REGARDING URBAN AREA SECURITY INITIATIVE (UASI) GRANT FUNDING THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is effective January 8, 2008, between THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO OFFICE OF HOMELAND SECURITY and THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY under the following terms and conditions: 1. The Participating Agency agrees to comply with the Grant Assurances for Urban Area Security Initiative (Attachment A). 2. The Participating Agency agrees to submit a Reimbursement Request Form (Attachment B) by the 10`}' day of each month to request reimbursement for costs incurred in accordance with the UASI grant program guidelines. 3. The Participating Agency agrees to submit at the time of signing of this MOU, and on October 1 of each year thereafter, a verified confirmation of its public safety personnel by category and within the definitions provided in item 3.1 below for each of those categories (Attachment C). Public safety personnel shall only be counted in one category and one job classification even if they have multiple disciplines, such as Fire Fighter and Paramedic. The required listing of public safety personnel shall be by job classification from personnel, payroll and/or budgetary records by category in the format below. 3.1 Public safety personnel categories and definitions shall be as follows (civilian personnel shall not be counted): Fire Services (FS) - Personnel at the urban area jurisdiction level who are in personnel classifications which provide services as first responders and meet the Hazmat First Responder Operations level requirements of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 291910.120 Section Q and Title 8 California Code of Regulations (CCR) Section 5192. Law Enforcement (LE) -- Personnel, in accordance with the provisions of California Penal Code Sections 830-832.16, who work for agencies at the local and municipal level with responsibility as sworn law enforcement officers. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) — Personnel and contractors who, on a full-time or part-time basis serve as first responders, Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) 1, I1 or Paramedic on ground -based and acro- medical services to provide pre -hospital care, through ambulance service, rescue squad, or medical engine company. Personnel must meet the 1 Memorandum of Understanding - Urban Area Security Initiative Grant Funding requirements set forth in the California Code of Regulations Title 22. Social Security, Division 9. Pre -hospital Emergency Medical Services Chapter 2, 3 or 4. IiazMat (IIZ) — Personnel, full-time or part-time, who identify, characterize, or provide risk assessment, and mitigate/control the release of a hazardous substance or potentially hazardous substance as Hazardous Materials Specialists or Technicians and members of the Hazardous Incident Response Team. 4. The Participating Agency agrees to maintain all documentation supporting all expenditures reimbursed from grant funds, and ensure all expenditures are allowable under grant requirements. Recipients that expend $300,000 or more of federal funds during their respective fiscal year agree to submit an organization - wide financial and compliance audit report. The audit shall be performed in accordance with the U. S. General Accounting Office Government Auditing Standards and OMB Circular A-133 (Federal Grantor Agency: U. S. Department of Homeland Security; Pass -Through Agency: Office of Homeland Security; Program Title: Public Assistance Grants; Federal CFDA Number: 97.008). The records shall be maintained and retained in accordance with UASI grant requirements and shall be available for audit and inspection by the City and designated grant agent personnel. 5. The Participating Agency agrees that all its expenditures shall be in accordance with the pre -approved expenditure details as submitted to the City and approved by the State of California Office of Homeland Security (CA -OHS) and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security Office of Domestic Preparedness (ODP). Any deviations from the pre -approved list shall be submitted to the City for approval before making such expenditures. 6. The Participating Agency agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees, from and against all liability arising out of the Participating Agency's acts or omissions under this MOU. 7. The City agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Participating Agency, its agents, officers, and employees, from and against all liability arising out of the City's acts or omissions under this MOU. Memorandum of Understanding - Urban Area Security Initiative Grant Funding IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Memorandum of Understanding is entered into by the City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security and the City of National City, by and through their authorized representatives. CITY OF SAN DIEGO By: Title: CITY OF NATIONAL CITY By: Ron Morrison Title: Mayor I HEREBY APPROVE the form and legality of the foregoing Memorandum of Understanding this _ day of , 2008. MICI-IAEL AGUIRRE, City Attorney By: Deputy City Attorney 3 Attachment A Name of Applicant: Office of Homeland Security Grant Assurances (All Applicants) City of National City Address: 140 East 12th Street, Suite A City: National City State: CA Zip Code: 91 950 Telephone Number: ( 6 1 9 ) 3 3 6— 4 5 5 6 Fax Number: ( 619) 336-4562 EMailAddress: wamedee@ci.national—city.ca.us As the duly authorized• representative of the applicant,) certify that the applicant named above: I. Has the legal authority to apply for federal assistance, and has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure proper planning, management and completion of the grant provided by the federal Department of Homeland Security and sub -granted through the State. of California. 2. Will assure that grant funds are only used for allowable, fair, and reasonable costs 3. Will give•the federal government, the General Accounting Office, the Comptroller General of the United States, the State of California, through. any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all paper or electronic records, books, papers, or documents related to the award; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with generally accepted accounting standards or awarding agency directives. 4. Will provide progress reports and such other information as may be required by the awarding agency. 5. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency. 6. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest, or personal gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, business or other tics. Attachment A 7. Will comply, if applicable, with the Lead -Based Paint Poisoning Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§ 4801 et seq.) which prohibits the use of lead based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures. Will comply with all federal statues relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: a. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L..88-352), as amended, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or national origin; b. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681- 1683 and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; c. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicaps; d. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§ 6101-6107) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; e. The Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255) as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; f. 'I'he Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; g. §§ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records; h. Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. § 3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; i. Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 42, Subparts C, D, E and G; j. Title 28, CFR, Part 35; k. Any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) under which application for federal assistance is being made, and 1. The requirements on any other nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application. 8. Will comply, or has already complied, with the requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq. (P.L. 91-646) which provides for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is acquired as a result of federal or federally assisted programs. These requirements apply to all interested in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of federal participation in purchases. 9. Will comply, if applicable, with the flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more. Attachment A 10. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: a. institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; b. notification of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; c. protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; d. evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; e. assurance of project consistency with the approved state management program developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1451 et seq.); f. conformity of federal actions to State (Clean Air) Implementation Plans under Section FY06 Homeland Security Grant Program Page 45 176(c)•of the Clean Air Act of 1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.); g. protection of underground sources of drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93-523); and h. protection of endangered species under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (P.I,. 93-205). i. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). California Public Resources Code Sections 21080-21098. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3 Section 15000-15007. 11. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968 (16 U.S.C. §§ 1271 et.seq.) related to protecting components or potential components of the national wild and scenic rivers system. 12. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), EO 11593 (identification and preservation of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469a-1 et seq). 13. Will comply with Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS) requirements as stated in the California Emergency Services Act, Government Code, Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2, Section 8607.1(e) and CCR Title 19, Sections 2445, 2446, 2447 and 2448. 14. Has requested through the State of California, federal financial assistance to be used to perform eligible work approved in the applicant's application for federal assistance. Will, after the receipt of federal financial assistance, through the State of Califomia, agree to the following: a. Promptly return to the State of California all the funds received which exceed the approved, actual expenditures as accepted by the federal or state government. b. b. In the event the approved amount of the grant is reduced, the reimbursement applicable to the amount of the reduction will be promptly refunded to the State of California. Attachment A c. Separately account for interest earned on grant funds, and will return all interest canted, in excess of $100 per federal fiscal year. 15. Will comply with the intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S C. Sections 4728-4763) relating to prescribed standards for merit systems for programs funded under one of the nineteen statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F), 16. Will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. Sections 1501-1508 and 7324- 7328) which limit the political activities of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with federal funds. 17: Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of human subjects involved in research, development, and related activities supported by this award of assistance. 18. Will comply, if applicable, with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966 (P. L. 89- 544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.) pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other activities supported by this award of assistance. FY06 Homeland Security Grant Program Page 46 19. Will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hour provisions of the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. 201), as they apply to employees of institutions of higher education, hospitals, and other non-profit organizations. 20. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. Section 276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. Section 276c and 18 U.S.C. Sections 874), and the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. Sections 327-333), regarding labor standards for federally assisted construction sub - agreements. 21. Will not make any award or permit any award (subgrant or contract) to any party which is debarred or suspended or is otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs under Executive Order 12549 and 12689, "Debarment and Suspension." 22. Agrees that: a. No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the making of any federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal grant or cooperative agreement; b. If any other funds than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or an employee of Congress, or employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the federal grant or 7 Attachment A cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form LLI., "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities," in accordance with its instructions; c. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub awards at all tiers including subgrants, contracts under grants and cooperative agreements, and subcontract(s) and that all sub recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. d. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. 23. Agrees that equipment acquired or obtained with grant funds: a. Will be made available under the California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement in consultation with representatives of the various fire, emergency medical, hazardous materials response services, and law enforcement agencies within the jurisdiction of the applicant. b. Is consistent with needs as identified in the State Homeland Security Strategy and will be deployed in conformance with that Strategy. c. Will be made available pursuant to applicable terms of the California Disaster and Civil Defense Master Mutual Aid Agreement and deployed with personnel trained in the use of such equipment in a manner consistent with the California Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Plan or the California Fire Services and. Rescue Mutual Aid Plan. 24. Agrees that funds awarded under this grant will be used to supplement existing funds for program activities, and will not supplant (replace) non-federal funds. 25. Will comply with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, including OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A102, A-110, A-122, and A-133, E.O. 12372 and Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements contained in Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 66 or 70, that govern the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally -assisted project. 26. Wi11 comply, and assure the compliance of all its subgrantees and contractors, with the nondiscrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789(d), or the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; the provision of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, M7100.1, and all other. applicable Federal laws, orders, circulars, or regulations. 27. Will comply with provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants and cooperative agreements, Including: a. Part 18, Administrative Review Procedures; b. Part 20, Criminal Justice Information Systems; 6 Attachment A c. Part 22, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Statistical Information; d. Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies; c. Part 30, Intergovernmental Review of Department of Justice Programs and Activities; f. Part 35, Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services; g. Part 38, Equal Treatment of Faith -based Organizations; h. Part 63, Floodplain Management and Wetland Protection Procedures; i. Part 42, Nondiscrimination/Equal Employment Opportunities Policies and Procedures; j. Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act; k. Part 64, Floodplain Management and Wetland Protection Procedures; and Federal laws or regulations applicable to Federal Assistance Programs. I. Part 66, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments. m. Part 67, Government -Wide Debarment and Suspension (Non -Procurement) n. Part 69, New Restrictions on Lobbying o. Part 70, Uniform Administrative Requirements for Chants and Cooperative Agreements (including sub -awards) with Institutions of Higher Learning, Hospitals and other Non -Profit Organizations. p. Part 83, Government -Wide Requirements for a Drug Free Workplace (grants) 28. Will ensure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of this project are not listed in the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list of Violating Facilities and that it will notify the Federal Grantor agency of the receipt of any communication from the Director of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under consideration for listing by the EPA. 29. Will comply with Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 1990. 30. Will, in the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State administrative agency makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds or race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the recipient will forward a copy of the finding to the Office of Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs. 31. Will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Plan, if applicable, to the Department of Justice Office of Civil Rights within 60 days of grant award. 32. Will comply with the financial and administrative requirements set forth in the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs (OJP) Financial Guide. 33. Will comply, if applicable,'with the provision of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (P.L. 97-348) dated October 19, 1982 (16 USC 3501 et seq.) which prohibits the expenditure of most new Federal funds within the units of the Coastal Barrier Resources System. q Attachment A 34. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other federal laws, executive orders, regulations, program and administrative requirements, policies and any other requirements governing this program. 35. Understands that failure to comply with any of the above assurances may result in suspension, termination or reduction of grant funds. 36. As required by Executive Order.12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, for prospective participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510 A. The applicant certifies that it and its principals: (a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default; and B. Where the applicant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shallattach an explanation to this application. 37. As required by the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F, for granteos, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620 A. The applicant certifies that it will or will continue to provide a drug -free workplace by: (a) Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; ID Attachment A (b) Establishing an on -going drug -free awareness program to inform employees about: (c) (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug -free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (a) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will (e) (1) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; Notifying the agency, in writing, within 10 calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531. Notice shall include the identification number(s) of each affected grant; (f)-T-aking one -of -the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicted (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug -free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f). 11 Attachment A As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications. The undersigned represents that he/she is authorized by the above named applicant to enter into this agreement for and on behalf of the said applicant. Signature of Authorized Agent: Printed Name of Authorized Agent: Walter Amedee . Title: Homeland Security Manager Date: 1� Office of :Homeland Security FY07 Urban Area Security Initiative Grant Program Award # Reimbursement Request Form Attachment B Mail Reimbursement Request to: City of San Diego Office of Homeland Security 1250 Sixth Avenue, Suite 1000A San Diego, CA 92101 EXPENDITURE PERIOD: FROM DATE AGENCY TO Type of Expenditures Approved Budget Reimbursement Requested This Period Total Reimbursements Requested To Date Unexpended Balance of Approved Budget E ui ment (1 $ $ $ $ Exercise (2) $ $ $ $ Training (2) $ $ $ $ Plannin (2) $ $ $ $ Total $ $ $ $ (1) A listing of all expenditures identified by number on the Approved Budget Detail Worksheet must be submitted as an attachment. (2) A listing of all personnel costs identified by project number on the Approved Project Detail Worksheet must be submitted as an attachment. Under penalty of perjury, 1 certify that: • I am the duly authorized point of contact of the agency named above • This claim is in all respects true, correct, and all expenditures were made in accordance with applicable laws, rules, regulations and grant conditions and assurances • This claim is for costs incurred within the Grant Performance Period Point of Contact Printed Name Phone No. Title E-Mail Address Mailing Address Fax No. City, State, Zip Codc Signature Date 13 Attachment C CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL BY CATEGORY Date: November 27, 2007 Agency: City of National City Authorized Agent Name: Walter Amedee Authorized Agent Signature: Public safety/emergency response personnel shall only be counted in one category, as defined in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Diego and the participating agency, and one job classification even if they have multiple disciplines, such as Fire Fighter and Paramedic. The required listing of public safety personnel shall be by job classification from personnel, payroll and/or budgetary records. If necessary, please use the additional lines within each category. Equipment Operator 3 Senior Equipment Operator 1 Street Maintenance Supervisor 1 Maintenance Worker 6 Street Sweeper Operator 2 Sewer Maintenance Supervisor 1 Building Trade Specialist 1 Facility Maintenance Supervisor 1 Electrician 1 Plumber 1 Custodian 8 Supervising Custodian 1 Equipment Mechanic 3 Equipment Maintenance Supervisor 1 Lead Equipment Mechanic 1 TOTAL 32 14f CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL BY CATEGORY •' ai ♦- Rid EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN I EMERGENCY MEDICAL TECHNICIAN 11 PARAMEDIC 12 LIFEGUARD I LIFEGUARD 11 LIFEGUARD III LIFEGUARD SERGEANT MARINE SAFETY LIEUTENANT LIFEGUARD CHIEF TOTAL FIR.F. RECRUIT (meets FS definition) 12 .-__ FIRE FIGHTER I FIRE FIGHTER It 20 FIRE ENGINEER 9 FIRE CAPTAIN 9 FIRE BATTALION CHIEF 4 FIRE SHIFT COMMANDER DEPUTY FIRE CIIIEF ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF FIRE CHIEF 1 DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 TOTAL 44 )5 CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL BY CATEGORY POLICE RESERVE 6 POLICE OFFICER I 50 POLICE OFFICER II POLICE AGENT POLICE CORPORAL 21 POLICE SERGEANT 13 POLICE LIEUTENANT 6 POLICE CAPTAIN 2 (Currently Vacant) ASSISTANT POLICE CHIEF 1 EXECUTTVE POLICE CHIEF POLICE CHIEF 1 RESERVE DEPUTY DEPUTY SHERIFF SHERIFF'S SERGEANT SHERIFF'S LIEUTENANT SHERIFF'S CAPTAIN SHERIFF'S COMMANDER ASSISTANT SHERIFF UNDERSHERIFF SHERIFF SENIOR POLICE OFFICER TOTAL ;,.' SSc.I_ ,-::1_,. .cam_ La: _ - - _ `--._.._ Police Dispatcher 100 12 Senior Police Dispatcher 1 TOTAL 13 lb CERTIFICATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL BY CATEGORY 1 ts 1 ., City Manager Mayor/CounciUCity Clerk 6 City Attorney 1 satin Officer 4- Risk Manager 1 Community Development Director 1 Assistant Police Chief 1 Homeland Security Manager 1 Assistant City Manager 1 Fire Chief 1 Police Chief 1 Community Services Director 1 Engineering Director 1 Director of Public Works 1 Planning Director 1 Principal Planner 1 Building & Safety Director 1 Purchasing Agent 1 Natieiial•CityLkansi `��iee-Prcsident/General -f Manager• Human Resources Director 1 MIS Manager 1 Finance Director 1 Senior Accountant 1 Payroll 1 Finance Secretary 1 TOTAL 28 17 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an amendment to the agreement with Computer Protection Technology, Inc. in the amount of $8,683.20 for the upgrade of the Data Center Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) System at City Hall PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Ron Williams MIS (Ext. 4373) EXPLANATION On November 21, 2006, the Council passed and adopted Resolution No. 2006-229(AUTHORIZING WAIVER OF THE FORMAL BIDDING PROCESS FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF AN UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM FROM COMPUTER PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY USING PC MAINTENANCE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $57261.28.) One of the Uninterruptible Power Supply(UPS) units was incorrectly assessed and installed. The power requirement of the City's Data Center warrants an upgrade of the UPS unit at a cost of $8683.20. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director Account No. 629-415-000-281-000 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Approve amendment to allow Computer Protection Technology to upgrade UPS unit. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 2006-229 Attachment 1: Resolution No. 2006-229 Attachment 2: Quote from Computer Protection Technology Attachment3: Amendment to Agreement A-200 (9/99) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH COMPUTER PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $8,683.20 FOR THE UPGRADE OF THE UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY (UPS) SYSTEM FOR THE CITY HALL DATA CENTER WHEREAS, on November 21, 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006-229, authorizing an Agreement with Computer Protection Technology, Inc. to provide Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Units for the Police Department and City Hall Data Centers; and WHEREAS, one of the Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Units at City Hall was incorrectly assessed and installed; and WHEREAS, the power requirement of the City's Data Center warrants an upgrade of the UPS unit at a cost of $8,683.20. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute an Amendment to Agreement between the City and Computer Protection Technology, Inc. to provide an upgraded Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Unit for the ECity Hall Data Center. Said Amendment to Agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 8th day of January, 2008. ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney Ron Morrison, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2006 - 229 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TFEE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING WAIVER OF THE FORMAL BIDDING PROCESS FOR THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF AN UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM FROM COMPUTER PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY USING PC MAINTENANCE AND POLICE DEPARTMENT FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $57,261.28 WHEREAS, on a number of occasions the City's current Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) systems have failed at the Police Department and at the Civic Center, causing key public safety systems:to go down; and WHEREAS, the City's M.I.S. staff recommends that Computer Protection Technology (CPT) supply and install a new UPS system for $57,261.28 without complying with formal bidding requirements, for the following reasons: 1. M.I.S. worked with CPT on the Data Center Relocation project, and is comfortable with the quality of their work, their technical expertise and reliability. M.I.S. also has first-hand knowledge of and confidence in CPT's engineering service and support capabilities. 2. Since CPT was involved in building the City's Data Center, they understand the scope of work. 3. CPT is familiar with M.I.S. projects for the City, and they understand the immediate and long-term needs and goals for data/network projects. 4. The price has been determined to be competitive within the industry. 5. No further purpose would be served by Issuing a formal bid at this point in the process; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.60.220(D) of the National City Municipal Code, the Purchasing Agent may dispense with the requirements of the bidding process when the City Council determines that due to special circumstances, it is in the City's best Interest to purchase a commodity or enter into a contract without compliance with the bidding procedure. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City finds that special circumstances exist and authorizes the waiver of the bidding process for the purchase and installation of an Uninterruptible Power Supply System from Computer Protection Technology using PC Maintenance and Police Department funds in the amount of $57,261.28. --- Signature Page to Follow --- Resolution No. 2006 — 229 November 21, 2006 Page 2 PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of November, 2006. ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney ayor Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California, on November 21, 2006, by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Councilmembers: Inzunza, Morrison, Natividad, Parra. Nays: None. Absent: Zarate. Abstain: None. AUTHENTICATED BY: NICK INZUNZA Mayor of the City of National City, California MICHAEL R. DALLA City Clerk of the City of National City, California By: Deputy I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2006-229 of the City of National City, California, passed and adopted by the Council of said City on November 21, 2006. d City Clerk of the City o National City, Califomia By: Deputy 'V � t tiff i 4 � :e.Ki #� * �5� .�'� •tivt-m� �w✓At} vliyYnnii...r Quotation ID ; 7320 Computer Protection Technology, Date j 12/18/2007 24 Hour Service: (800) 841-0789 Fax: • Delivery 3-4 weeks 1537 Simpson Way, Escondido, CA 92029 mmurf@cptups.com Ship Via Prepared By Best Way : Mike Murphy i0�1i'l Y-v�.'((yi I{ Customer: City of National City Contact: Ron Williams Location: City Hall Purchasing " Phone: 619-336-4373 Address: 1243 National City Blvd. Fax: National?City, CA Email: rwilliams@ci.national.city.ca.us �9195v0 .y�^ sy.`.bry t `6 'P'+4�-'.} r'x. . y; s r ..v d R F.q i ,4 : +-.:.., ....i5' _.-•;I' ��; '4n ,,t 4 N -e - .� f r !ram,-TSi�•, . i,. ' ... '' = ' ta° r r _ 1' - .,.. u�,�`...r.1 1 _lt .... 1.00 -. +. _.. jJ x..'//��. a •. ,.: l �•�� .�y __. .:'..>�1t ..Ft..ilS.4... ._e �i`liiE (r .+r 1'yYYl.r`bY:lr:•LJ-0i.- ~�jjj jI tt� -e 4ry • u Mitsubishi 2033C Series UPS -- 20 kVA Capacity: 20 kVA / 16 kW Input: 208 VAC 3-phase 4-wire plus ground Output: 120/208 VAC 3-phase 4-wire plus ground True on-line technology Utilize existing batteries Dimensions: 17.7' W x 31.5"D x 43.3"H Weight: 818 lbs Warranty: 2 year factory on site parts & labor (See enclosed literature for complete specifications) M23C-02014-24B00C $16,199.30 $16,199.30 2 1.00 New Mitsubishi Wall -Mounted Bypass Panel No. of Breakers: 3 Rating: 70 Amp / 240 VAC Dimensions: 24"W x 9"D x 37'H Weight: 1351bs WB233-NDP-070-208 $1,086.30 $1,086.30 ($11,779.15) ($11,779.15) 3 1.00 Credit for 12 kVA UPS, SNMP Card, Maintenance Bypass CPT Credit , , f .t Sales Tax $7.75 $426.75 S <«� t'. 1. � JI �` I±1 - 3172 Start -Up and Operator Training Freight to Job Site $775.00 Installation $1,975.00 .,. w ,,; ss �%. $8,683.20 Computer Protection Technology, Inc. 1537 Simpson Way, Escondido, CA 92029 Attn:Mike Murphy Payment Terms Net 30 Days FOB Factory Quote Valid 7 Days AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND COMPUTER PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC. This Amendment to Agreement is entered into this 8th day of January, 2008, by and between the City of National City, a municipal corporation ('the CITY"), and Computer Protection Technology, Inc. (the "CONTRACTOR"). RECITALS A. The CITY and the CONTRACTOR entered into an agreement on November 30, 2006, ("the Agreement") wherein the CONTRACTOR agreed to provide Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Units for the Police Department and City Hall Data Centers. B. The parties desire to amend the Agreement to expand the Scope of Work to be performed pursuant to the Agreement, for the upgrade of the City Hall Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Unit at a cost of $8,683.20, as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A". NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement entered into on November 30, 2006, shall be amended to expand the Scope of Work to be performed pursuant to the Agreement, for the upgrade of the City Hall Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) Unit at a cost of $8,683.20, as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein by reference. The parties further agree that with the foregoing exception, each and every term and provision of the Agreement dated November 30, 2006, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written. CITY OF NATIONAL CITY By: Ron Morrison, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney COMPUTER PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC. (Corporation — signatures of two corporate officers) (Partnership — one signature) (Sole proprietorship — one signature) By: (Name) PrLe41 (Title) (Title) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ..EETING DATE !anuary 8, 2008 7 AGENDA ITEM NO. (-ITEM TITLE Warrant Register # 23 for the period of 11/29/07 through 12/04/07 in the Amount of $1,045,937.13 PREPARED BY D. Gallegos -Finance DEPARTMENT EXPLANATION Finance Jeanette Ladrido 619-336-4331 Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 11/29/07 through 12/04/07. EXT. The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants Above $50,000.00 Vendor Payroll Check# Amount Explanation various $ 844,677.22 PPE 11/19/07 Environmental Review N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement ( Approved By%d Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION tification of w9 `ants in t ,: am• ntnof 1,09.,937.13 ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Warrant Register #23 Resolution No. A-200 (Rev. 7/03) PAYEE City of National City WARRANT- REGISTER 4 23 12/4/2007 DESCRIPTION CIIKNO DATE AMOUNT CI IICANO COALITION RETIREMENT EVENT FOR W.VIRCIIIS 218169 11/29/2007 50.00 GARCIA PAYDATE or 11'2.R,07 218170 11/29/2007 1,815.82 BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP LABOR LAW SEMINAR 218171 12/25/2007 56.00 AIR-TF.K R&M AIR CONDITIONING SERVICES 218172 12/4/2007 1,526.00 ASTRO MI CHANICAL CONTRACTORS REPAIR/MAINTENANCE OF I(VAC SYS 218173 12/4/2007 340.00 AT& I'MCI PHONE C60 449-7549 OCT 2007 2181'14 12/4/2007 9,006.48 AI&I/MCI PHONE 619477-9738 1I/13-12/12/07 2181"/5 12/4/2007 246.71 RANK OF AMERICA CRP:UI1 CAW FEES 218176 1 2,'4/2007 1,199.74 BA ROAIN CENTER INC IIIPWAL>ER 218177 1 2/4/2007 129.20 ,A VFNCOFF SUBSIST LN(E & IRAV11. EXP 218178 12/40007 1,072.62 BCM CUSTOMER SERVICE MONTH! Y MAIN1 ENANCE SERVICE 218179 12/4/2007 15(1.00 BECKER DIGGS & ASSOCIATES CI ISTOMFR TRAINING PROGRAM 218180 12/4/2007 14,750.00 BELJANE WEB SERVICES QUICKSSL CERTIFICATE, I YEAR 218181 12/4/2007 387.00 BEST BES F & KRIEGER LLP LABOR LAW SEMINARS 218182 12/4/2007 140.00 BROADWAY AUTO ELECTRIC ELECTRICAL PARTS VEIIICI.LS 218183 12/4/2007 953.59 CAI.IFORNIA COMMERCIAL SECURITY MOP 45754 PIN ORIGINAL KEY 218184 12/4/2007 126.49 CAI .IFORNIA FI ECTRIC SUPPLY MOT' 445698 ELECTRICAL. SL'PPI IES 218185 12/4/2007 600.66 C:ARQUEST AUTO PARTS MOP 447557 FUEI. FILTERS 218186 12/4/2007 26.93 CFB CA CIVIL LITIGATION FORMS 718187 12/4/2007 324.53 CHADWICK CENTER FOR CHIT DR EN ('ONFF.RENCE REGISTRATION 218188 12/4/2007 250.00 CINGIJLAR WIRELESS PD UA-I A CONNECTION I0/21-1120.07 218189 12/4/2007 496.17 -Y OF NATIONAL CITY PEE I Y ('ASH 0C l'07 218190 12/4/2007 1,278.55 CLF WAREHOUSE FIRI- BOXES 218191 12/4/2007 163.92 CONS!RU('IHONELECTRONICS INC MAIN (FNANCFSVC DE( 0i 218192 12/4/2007 843.55 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER 11 23 12/4/2007 PAYEE DESCRIPTION CIIK NO DATE AN1OUN•!' COOPER'S PLUMBING Sc. IIEATING PLUMBING REPAIRS 218193 I2/4/2l1(17 12 i CORPORATE EXPRESS MOP i 45704 CALENDARS218194 12/4i2007 /51 34 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES BI.ANKE:T PO FOR GUNSHOT 218195 12i4i2007 950 00 CPS IIIJM.ANRESOURCE SERVICES I.AWENFORCEMENT OFFICER TEST 218196 17/4i2007 ].000.50 I) -MAX ENGINEERING INC OCTOBER 2007 SERVICES 218197 12/4,2007 20.198 60 DAPPER TIRE. COMPANY TIRES FOR CITY FLEET 218198 124/2007 140.96 DMA TICKET INC PCI PROCESSING OCT 2007 218199 1 2/4; 2007 2,18).95 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FINGERPRINTING FEES - NEW IIIRES 218200 12/4/2007 151.00 DION INTERNATIONAL TRUCK INC. BELT 218201 12/4/2007 93.66 DISCOUNT SPECIALTY CIIEMICALS PIJNCII DEGREASER, .AEROSOL 218202 12/4/2007 .I67.• DIXIELINE LUMBER CO. MOP t-45707 BATTERY:CHARGER KIT 218203 12/4/2007 1,306.15 DREW FORD MOP #49078 ROTOR ASSEMBLY 218204 12/4/2007 297.18 EMPLOYMENT- DEVELOPMENT DEPT UNEMPLOYMENT INS REIMB 218205 12/4/2007 12,350.00 ENTERIAINMENI PUBLICAIIONSINC PROMOTIONAL ACT IVITIES 218206 12/472007 96.00 EXPRESS TEL LONG DIS I ANCF. I0/20 11'20/07 218207 12/4/2007 134.23 ELEEI PRIDE. AIR SPRING ASSFMRI.Y 218208 1274/2007 1 75 69 FON-JON KENNELS KENNEL FEES FOR KV'S 218209 12:4/2007 1 10 I10 GENERAL & SPECIAL I Y INSPECTION OF FIRE Al ARM PANEL 218210 121/2007 8i 00 GOILMSLN APPLIANCE CO FIL7 ER, WATER 218211 12/4/2007 74'? 4 ? GOVERNING GOVERNING SUBSCRJI'i ION 218212 12/4/2007 16.110 GRAINGER MOP #45698 TORQUE WRENCH 218213 12:472007 98.50 GROSSMAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC PRE EMP PSYCHO! OCecAl, EXAMS 218214 12/4/200i /2' GTE SYSTEMS. INC PROFFSSIONAI, NE wOR. SUPPORT 21 X2 15 12 4:2007 1,265.61 HONEYWELI.-INC- i-ONTRACTMAINTLNANCESVC 218216 12:4/2007 S,I05.00 1 City of National City 'WARRANT RECJS LF:R it 23 12/4/2007 PAYEE: DESCRIPTION CDR NO DATE AMOUNT J & M CARPET SERVICE CITY WIDE-. CARPET CLEANING 218217 12/4/2007 275.00 KIN(; MICHAEI. HEALTH DEDUCTION 218218 12/4/2007 90.33 LADRIDO TRAVEL EXPENSE.S 218719 12/4/2007 672.08 LASER SAVER INC COMPATIRI.I' I.AZER JET INK 218220 12/4/2007 343.79 MADMEN MISPLACED WARRANT434576 218221 12/4/2007 739.12 MAN K-9 INC. MAINTENANCE TRAINING UC I i00' 218222 12/4/2007 600.00 MARTINEZ DIRECT DEPOSIT/RETURNED 21822 i 12/4/2007 139.58 METRO FIRE EQUIPMENT ANNUAL FIRE EXTINGUISHER SVC 21 R224 12/4/2007 71.10 MILE OF CARS ASSOCIATION FY07-08 API'ORT IONMENI t 4 218225 12/4/2007 13,572.19 A/INL-IEMAN PRESS MOP 47939 RE7 VRN LNVEI. OP}-S 218276 12/4/2007 816.45 MONIC;OMFRYKONE.INC. MAINTENANCE TOFIFVATORSCITY 218227 12/4/2007 546.20 MOKGAN SQUARE, INC. FY07-08 APPORTIONMENT 44 218228 12/4/2007 5,875.70 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY CRAYON, WEIGHTS, COATED 218229 12/4/2007 140.82 NAPA AUTO PARTS MOP 445715 BOOSTER PACK 218230 12/4/2007 430.58 NFBPA NFBPA MEMBERSHIP 218231 12/4/2007 175.00 PACIFIC AUK.) REPAIR STARTER 218232 12/4/2007 454.35 PERRY FORD MOP 445703 SOLENOID REPAIRS 21823 i 12/4/2007 627.73 PERVO T RAMC (ENTER MOP 463846 STREE 1 PAIN I 218234 12/4/2007 555.17 PRUDEN I IA I. OVERA!.1. SUPPI Y MOP 45742 LAUNDRY SEKVICF 218235 12/4/2007 250.47 RCP BLOCK & HRICK IN( . CONCRETE SAND 218236 12/4/2007 225.20 REI-IARI E SPRING & SUSPENSION REPAIR PLATE 21 R7.? / 12/4/2007 179.94 VERSIDI. SHERIFF'S DEI' TUTITONLLAW ENFORCEMENT 218238 12/4;2007 35.00 RON BAKER CIIEVROLET-GEO-ISUZU MU!';!457'I GEAR BOX & RESERVOIR 218239 12/4/2007 848.67 SAN DIEGO HYDRAULICS AIR VALVE 218240 12/4/2007 95.15 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER # 23 12/4/2007 PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMOUNT SAN DIEGO MIRAMAR COLLEGE BASIC: COURSE INTENSIVE 218241 12/4/2007 1,800.00 SAN DIEGO MIRAMAR COLLEGE TUIIIUN/RLG OFFICERS TRAINING 218242 1 2/4/2007 60.00 SAN DIFUU POLICE EQUIPMENT CIS MODEL 7290 FLASIIBANGS 218243 1214 2007 1,351.98 SDG&E FACII.1rnsinvisiON 218244 12.42007 26,016.15 SHRED FORCE SHREDDING 218245 12'4/2007 72.95 SHRED -CI SHREDDING SERVICES 218246 12/4/2007 305.00 SMART & FINAL MOP 4Yi56 MISC SUPPLIES 218247 1 2'4/2007 60.48 SPARKLE'IT:S WATER FOR COUNCIL OFFICE 218248 12/4/2007 44.45 SPARKLE I L S WATER FOR MAYOR OFFICE 218249 12/4/ 2007 28.41.. SUN BADGE COMPANY INC. REPAIR. REBANNER AND BADGES 21825(1 12/4/2007 120.y,. SUN TRUST NEW' FIRE (RUCK#I PAYM1'#46 218251 12/4/2007 5,009.63 SWRUBACCOUNIINGOFFICE ANNUAL S-IORM 1WAIERFEE 218252 12/4/2007 3,117.00 TAKE CHARGE Ell NESS ON-1 OCATION GRP FITNESS 21825.1 12/4/2007 140.00 THE LIGHTHOUSE. ININU MOP 1'45726 HALOGEN RULFt 218254 12/4/2007 70.73 THF, RFGIONAI. TRAINING CF.N FOR TUITION/RECORD CLERK COURSE 218255 12/4/2007 494.00 THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA 2008 MEMIWR/SILVA & DOUCETTE 218256 12/4/2007 910.00 TOM MOYNAHAN MOP 45734 TOWING SERVICF_ 218257 12/4/2007 50.00 TOPFCO PRODUCTS MOP #63849 HEXAGON NUTS 218258 12/4/2007 3.89 U S IIF.AI.THW'ORKS MEDICAL. SERVICES 218259 124/2007 242.00 IINION TRIBUNE PI :BUSHING CO ADVERTISING/JOB 218260 12/4/2007 350.00 1!NITFD RFNTAI S LADDER, STEP, 16 ET, FIBERGLASS 218261 12412007 310.41 VCAMAIN STANIMAL HOSPiiAI. K9 VET CARE 218262 12/4/2007 682 VERIZON wIRELI SS CI LY CELL PHONES 10.22-1 I /21'07 218263 12/4/2007 3,291 .45 WPD wIPER BLADES 218261 12:4/2007 47.84 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER tl 23 12/4/2007 PAYEE DESCRIPTION Workers compensation checks CDR NO DATE E AMOUNT 159,670.98 14052 11/19/2007 56.93 14053 11/19/2007 42.02 14054 11/19/2007 45.81 14055 1 I.'192007 185.15 14056 11/19'2007 68.62 1405! 11/19.-2007 204.35 14058 11/19/2007 447.23 141)59 11/19/2007 10.18 14060 11/19/2007 126.77 14061 11/19/2007 318.05 14062 11/19/2007 85.29 14063 11/19/2007 56.56 14064 11/19/2007 39.76 14065 11/19/2007 492.18 14066 11;192007 77.56 14067 11/19/2007 166.47 14068 11/19/2007 255.40 14069 11/19/2007 189.58 14070 11/19/2007 141.10 14071 11/19/2007 76.13 14072 11/19/2007 142.50 140 /.I 11/19/2007 74.49 PAYEE City of National City WARRANT REGISTER k 23 •DESCRIPTION 12/4/2007 CIIK NO DATE AMOUNT 14074 1 1: 19/2007 134.0 1.1075 11:19/2007 /4.49 14076 1 1: 19,'2007 1 1. i I 14077 1 1, 19.'2007 ;,3 t7 61 1407X 1 1;1912007 193. t1 14019 I l %202007 17. / , 14080 11 20'2007 30.5.E 14081 1170/2007 624.05 14082 1 l / 20/2007 104 1408.3 ! 1 '20 2007 454.85 14084 11 21V2007 34.86 14085 1 1 /21 /2007 370.00 14086 1 1 ; 212007 400.00 14087 11; 21 /2007 i(>6.00 14088 11 '21'2007 400 (1(1 14089 11 21/2007 440.00 14090 11.'21/2007 400.00 14091 1 1.2 1 /2007 72.14 14092 11/21/2007 32.30 14093 11 '26%2007 170.7.3 14094 11 262007 82.51.: 14(195 1 1 '26/2007 76.46 14096 11"269007 27.97 1409-i 11 •7772007 1,020 00 City of National City W 1RRANT REGISTER # 23 12/4/2007 PAYEE DESCRIPTION (:1J1( NO DATE AMOUNT 14098 1 1,27;2007 354.24 14099 11/27/2007 354.24 14100 11/27,2007 354.2.4 14101 11/27/2007 384.88 14102 11/272007 940.16 14103 11/27/2007 80.61 14104 11/27/2007 183.51 14105 I I /27%2007 475.24 14106 11127/2007 351.18 14107 1 1 /27;2007 245.64 14108 11/27.2007 48.39 14109 11/27/2007. 129.16 14110 11/27/2007 188.42 14111 11/27/2007 98.59 14112 11/27/2007 145.28 14113 11/27/2007 48.62 14114 11 /27'2007 16.21 14115 11/27/2007 90.01 14116 1 1 /272007 79.65 14117 11/27/2007 216.49 14118 11/27/2007 141.10 14119 1 1;27/2007 1,218.93 14120 110712007 18.82 14 121 1 1 /2 i /2001 364 15 PAYEE City of National City \VARRANT RF(:INTFR # 23 DESCRIPTION 12/4/2007 CIIK NO DATE AMOUNT 14122 11;27/2001 94 t1 14123 11/27/2007 i4 49 14124 11/27//2001 /4.49 14125 11/27/2007 /1.49 14126 11/27/2007 1 18.9 / 14121 1127//007 67.00 14128 11!27/2001 ;64.23 14129 1 1 /27/2007 361.00 14130 1 1-28/2001 14131 11:28.2007 14132 1I/28/2007 14133 11/28/2007 14134 11 /28:2007 14135 11/28/2007 14136 11/28/2007 14137 11/28/2007 14138 11/28/2007 14139 11/28/2007 14140 11/29:2007 14141 1 1!29- 2001 14142 1 1!30; 2007 14143 1 1 ,30 2007 14144 1I,/02007 14145 II'31:1001 68. 41.44 1,41898 440.00 400.00 371.00 440 00 140.00 10.00 80.tlt) 14 42 9 14 49 iO-.- 4I �Il 12-)0 337.20 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER 4 23 12/4/2007 PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DA'I'H: AMOUNT 14146 11/30/2007 2.822.90 14147 11/30/2007 391.50 14148 11/302007 256.50 14149 11/30./2007 391.50 14150 11/30/2007 864.00 14151 12i3/2007 99.74 14152 12/312007 136.44 14153 12i312007 443.69 14154 12/3/2007 1.4 97.00 14155 12/3/2007 19 3.54 14156 12/3/7007 422.50 14157 12/3/2007 49.42 141ix 12/3/2007 65.73 14159 12/3/2007 96.20 14160 12/3/2007 197.20 14161 12/3/2007 68.61 14162 12/3/2007 39.92 14163 12/3/2007 94.89 14164 12/4/2007 744.84 14165 12/4/2007 115.85 14166 12/4/2007 250.00 14167 12/4/2007 338.70 14168 12/4, 2007 171.79 14169 12/4/2007 104.67 PAYEE PAYROII. Pay period 24 Start Date City of National City WARRANT REGISTER It 23 12/4/2007 DESCRIPTION Fnd Date (heck Date 1 1, 6/2007 1 1;19/2007 Total 1 o(al CIIK NO DATE AMOUNT 14170 124200: 16 14171 12.42007 85.29 14172 12.4.2007 116.22 14173 12.4 2007 113.08 14174 12:4/2007 809.54 14175 171417007 3 32. 18 14176 12'1.2007 129.35 14177 17'4.7011; 7,174.43 14178 12'4, 2007 80 14179 12'4, 200 78.49 14180 12'4/2007 65.19 14181 1 2.'4/ 20077 74.49 14182 12'4'2007 57.95 14183 12 4,2007 279.74 41,588.93 201,259.91 1 1 728/2007 844,677.22 (.RAND TOTAI, 1,045,937.13 City of National City Warrant Register # 23 12/4/2007 001 GENERAL FUND 104 LIBRARY FUND 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 109 GAS TAXES FUND 111 P.O.S.T. FUND 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 136 TINY 1 OT CLASSES FUND 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIS1 CONTRAC 191 STOP PROJECT 212 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND 230 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT GRANT 246 WINGS GRANT 254 LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCI ION GRANT 282 REIMBURSABLE GRANTS CITYWIDE 290 POLICE DEPT GRANTS 294 HUD HEALTHY HOMES GRANT 301 GRANT-C.D.B.G. 302 CDC PAYMENTS 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 320 LIBRARY GRANTS 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 627 LIABILITY INS. FUND 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAIN I ENANC 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 632 GENERAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 633 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE RESERVE 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 723 PROMO ITEMS FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFI I 653,842.77 27,987.35 19,261.46 4,386.70 1,660.65 39,862.01 65.67 2,829.85 744.13 899.46 2,870.85 525.94 8,426.16 898.31 7,286.00 3,162.15 34,397.08 3,280.48 149.62 3,886.31 1,763.22 10,222.15 34,687.53 5,591.96 6,185.36 56,185.71 45,312.03 4,514.56 6,449.07 15,412.77 15, 050.48 12,350.00 15,693.34 96.00 Total 1,045,937.13 L City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ,EETING DATE January 8, 2008 8 AGENDA ITEM NO. I -ITEM TITLE Warrant Register # 24 for the period of 12/05/07 through 12/11/0( in the Amount of $756,949.66 PREPARED BY D. Gallegos -Finance DEPARTMENT Finance EXT. Jeanette Ladrido EXPLANATION 619-336-4331 Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 12/05/07 through 12/11/07. The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants Above $50,000.00 Vendor Health Net Kaiser Foundation Public Emp. Ret. Zondiros Corp. Check# 218307 218317 218334 218355 Amount Explanation $ 60,424.36 120,393.81 229,178.27 146,012.50 Health Ins. Kaiser Ins. Emp. Retirement NC Pump Station i Environmental Review N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement >STAFF RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. Approved By: cA,t,„ d� LA'i a Direct r Account No. a i ica ion o wrran sin) ea eun of 75 ,949.66 �- -� ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Warrant Register #24 Resolution No. A.200 (Rev. 7/03) Paycc SRILLPATH SEMINARS ANTONIA RODRIGUF.7. AND HER City of National City WARRANT REGISTER #24 12/1112007 Description MANAGING EMOTIONS SEMINAR IIABILITY CLAIM liARRETT ENGINEERED PUMPS IN LABOR, TEST, INSPEC:'I7SVC POOL C:API CAL EXPRESS FIRE/LTD DECEMBF.R 2007 CAL EXPRESS NOV CI IARGFS CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL SI?CUR MOP 457.54 3KA 0324 PADLOCK CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT PD/LTD DECEMBER 2007 • C:FSNAUSKAS CIIILDREN'S IIOSPITAI. CHOICEPOINT INGLJLAR WIRELESS CORPORATE. EXPRESS COI 1NCII. OF STATE ARCHIVISTS COI JNTY CITY CLERK CS1 ("GENERAL, INC. D3 EQI11PMENT DAVIES DELTA DENIAL DELTACARE (PMI) DEPARI MENT OF JUSTICE DIXIFI.INE LUMBER CO. DOKKI•.N ENGINEERING EL.I7.ABETH ALAMILLO, ON BEHAL ELIZABEIHI ALAMILLO, ON BEIIAI. EMCO INDUSTRIES, INC. 125 PLAN REIMBURSEMENT CI ILLD SEXUAL ABUSE EXAMS AUTO TRACK DATABASE DATA CONNECTION "F HROUG11 PD MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES RESCUING FAMILY RI.:COR.DS RECORDING E 18T11 STREET REFUND/DOUBLE PAYMENT SPL.11' PIN: SAFETY 125 PLAN REIMBURSEMENT DENTAL INS DECEMBER 2007 DEN IAL INS PM1 DECEMBER 2007 FINGERPRINTING FOR NEW HIRES MOP 45707 ENERGIZER BATTERY OCTOBER 2007 SERVICES LIABILITY CLAIM LIABILITY CLAIM CI.LANER, DISINFECTANT NTI=.R I AINMENE PUBLICATIONS 1 FNIERI AINMENT BOOKS - DEC 07 chk no chk date amount 218265 12 `5/07 164.17 218266 12/11/07 3,750.00 218267 12/11/07 280.00 218268 12/11/07 656.00 218269 12/11/07 40.00 218270 12/11.07 317.77 218271 12/11/07 1,755.00 218272 1211/07 368.00 218273 1271 1 /07 2,316.00 218274 12/11/07 100.00 218275 12/11/07 2,163.53 218276 12111.'07 1,276.13 218277 12/ 1 1,07 13.00 218278 12/1 1107 100.00 218279 12/11/07 1,769.80 218280 12/11/07 55.75 218281 12/11 %07 1,239.16 218282 12/ 1 1/07 15,477.96 218283 1211 1 / 01 3,629.14 218284 121 1 /07 1,030.00 218285 12/11/07 333.88 218286 12.' 1 1 %07 41,529.85 218287 12/11/07 1,000.00 218288 12/11/07 1,500.00 218289 12/1 1/07 103.53 218290 12/11/07 160.00 1 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER #24 12/il/2007 1'avee Description ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS SERV I I11D LEAD I IAZARD CONTROL.. clik no clik date amount 218291 12 1 1'07 1.14.00 ENVIRONMENT. -AL IIAZ.ARDS SERV I.E.AI) DUST WIPES 218292 12/1 I'07 120(10 ENVIRONMENTAL IIAZARDS SERV 'IUD I.EAD I lA7.ARD CONTROL 218293 12/ I 1;07 102.00 ENVIRONMENTAL IIAZARDS SERV }BM I.EAD IIA7.ARD CONTROL 218294 12i 11/07 90.00 ENVIRONMENTAL. HAZARDS SERV LEAD WIPE SAMPLES ANALYZED 218295 12.11/07 18.00ENVIRONMENTAL. HAZARDS SERV LEAD DIJST WIPES 218296 12'11,07 18.00 EXl'1:RIAN CREDIT CHECKS FOR NEW f'I) EMP 218297 12 11!07 55.87 FABINSKI REHAB/LAW ENFORCEMENT EXP 218298 12/ 11i07 327.65 FBINAA CALIFORNIA CHAPTER TUITION/CLEED SEMINAR 218299 12'11/07 L.350.00 FEDEX FEDEX OVERNI(.1I1T DELIVERY 2I8300 I2/I 1 07 25.63 FEDEX KINKO'S CARDS LOCK MAILERS FOR NHC 218301 12/ 1 1;07 239.56 FON-JON KENNELS KENNEL. FEES FOR POLICE K9'S 2I8302 12/11/07 150.0' G. BA1.1"ARD STL DIO CITY COUNCIL. PORTRAITS 218303 12/ 1 1107 750.00 GONZALEZ REHAB/TRAVEL EXPENSE 218304 12/11/07 66.15 GOVPARTNER NC REQUEST PARTNER WL•BSITE 218305 12/11/07 9,000.00 HARRJS & ASSOCIATES OCT 2007 SERVIC I/S 218306 12/ 1 1107 4.160.05 HEALIlI NET HEALTH INS H0067A DEC'07 218307 12/I1/07 60,424.36 HEALTH NET HEAL'flI NET DEC07 57135J 218308 1211/07 950.10 FIEAL LH NET HEAL'llI-FULL NETWORK 57135A 218309 12r'l 1/07 13,327.31 HEAL►IJ NET HEAL"ITI-RET INS 110067F DEC'07 218310 12/I 1 07 2,561.84 HEALTH NET 11EALTHNET RETIREES 57135F INS 218311 12/11/07 555.29 IIINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSO CONT SVCS SALES TAX 4TH C)IR 218312 12/ 1 1 07 28,033.06 JIODGES REIMB FOR MILEAUF 218313 12/1 1/07 102.34 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCl1 I ICC GOVERNMENTAL. MEMBERSHIP 218314 12.'11/07 180.00 IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS MNGMT-DOCUMENTSTORAGE 218315 12/l1•07 705.00 JEFFFRSON PILOT FINANCIAL LIPF. STD Ll D DECEMBER 2007 218 t 16 12'11/07 12.158.95 KAISER FOUNDATION UF:ALTH PLA KAISER INS ACTIVE DECEMBER 2007 21831"7 12/11/07 110.393.8 Payee City of National City WARRANT REGISTER #24 12/ 1 1 /21)07 Descrmtion KAISER FOUNDATION IIEALIH PLA KAISER REF INS DECEMBER 2007 KE1'CHUM MEG. CO. INC. KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. LASER SAVER INC LIEBERT CASSIDY WIIITMORE LIEBERT CASSIDY WHIT MORE LOPEZ MAGGIORA MAN K-9 INC. MORE DIRECT N C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE NATIONAL ASSOC OF S R 0 OLIVARES PERRY FORT) POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY l'U1.U1.1C 1{M1' RETIREMENT SYSTEM R.J. SAF1 FY SUPPLY ROJAS ROSA CARRII.LO AND HER DOG LICENSE TAGS BATTERY AND CHARGER MOI' 45725 TONER CARTRIDGE. RETAINER AGREEMENT SEP-OCT'07 GENERAL OC:TOBER SERVICES TRANSLATION SERVICES 125 PLAN RF.JMRIJRSF.MENT MAINTENANCE TRAINING - NOV 07 111' I'ROCIJRVF, MANAGER PLUS NC RAYFRONT AND EXPO FEE. TIJITION/RASIC SRO REM JEST 125 I'i.AN RPII\111I JRSEMENT MOPti45703 FAIJI.TY SENSOR REPAIRS MOP ii67839 BATTERIES MOP 445742 UNIFORMS - PARKS SERVICE PERIOD 11-07-4 ORANGE SURVEYOR VEST 125 PLAN REIMBURSEMENT LIABILITY CLAIM SAN DIEGO COIN I BAR ASSOC 2007-2008 MEMBERSHIP DUES SAN I)IF.GO UNION TRIBUNE SANCIIF7 SDCIAA S11.VA S FRATACOM TAM'. C:IIARGF: FITNESS PUBLIC HEARING NOTICESPLANNING 125 PLAN REIMBURSEMENT 2008 SDCIAA MEMBERSHIP DI IFS 125 PLAN RFIMBI JRSEMFN I MOP 63845 CORREC"FION FORMS GRP FITNESS INSTR1JC1 ION chk no chk date amount 218 118 12/11/07 :;,756.06 ' 18119 12/11/07 303.09 218320 12/11/07 3,882.37 218321 12/11/07 527.22 218322 12/11/07 1,300.00 218323 12/11/07 78.00 218324 12/ 11/07 175.00 218325 12/11/07 221.00 218326 12/11/07 800.00 ' 18327 12/11/07 1,506.19 218328 12/11/07 75.00 218329 12/11/07 990.00 218330 12/11/07 656.94 218331 12/11/07 540.12 218332 12/11/07 240.19 218333 12/11/07 316.81 218334 12/11/07 229,178.27 218335 12/11/07 196.85 218336 12/11/07 323.62 218337 12/11/07 5,000.00 218338 12/11/07 180.00 218339 12/11/07 2,111.10 218340 12/11/07 289.46 218341 12/11/07 30.00 218342 12/11./07 2,848.30 218343 12/11/07 272.43 218344 12/11/07 280.00 3 Payee TARULLI TIRE SAN DIEGO INC THE I.IG11.1710U81.., INC. THOMSON WEST City of National City WARRANT REGIS1 ER #24 I2/I 1/2007 Description MOP /i47940 TIRES MOP ii45726 HEADLIGHTS 1.I{C IA1. PI JBI.ICATIONS I.JNION SECURITY INSURANCE CO. VTL DLCLMI4ER 2007 UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO ADVERTISING FOR I.EGAL NOTICES US STERLING CAPITAL CORP TRADE SETTLING CJIARGES VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SPECIALTIES MOP ii46453 PLUMBING MATERIALS VLRIZON WIRELESS VISTA PAINT VISTA PAINT ZONDIROS CORP. CELL PHONES - 10/27-11/26;07 MOP 68834 PAINTING SIJPPI,IES MOP 68834 PAINTING SUPPLIES OCTOBER 2007 SERVICES chk no 218345 2183'16 21834% 218348 218349 218350 218351 218352 218353 2.18354 218355 chkdatc amount 121107 382.79 12.1107 555.13 12/ 1 1 /07 1,207.53 12.11/07 2,310.31 1 2i1 1 '07 1,060.20 12.11107 198.81 12..1I/07 457.77 12. 1 1,'07 806.11 12'111(17 148.10 12' 11:'07 108.01 12/l L07 146,012.50 Workers compensation checks Total S 745.962.5 11184 141 14186 1418'/ 14188 14189 14190 14191 14192 14193 14194 14195 14196 14197 12,5/07 12/5/07 12/5/07 12/5/07 12/5/07 12/5(07 12./5/07 1 25/07 12;5 /07 12,5/07 12.5/07 12/5 07 12 5/07 12/5/07 370.00 400.00 724.25 265.68 253.99 84.14 506.00 211.70 400.00 440.00 400.00 32.30 1,231.19 l 3.0- 4 City of National City WARRANT REGISTER #24 12/11/2007 Pa}fee Description chic no chk date amount 1419E I2.'Si07 63.59 14199 12.'507 214.20 14200 12/5/07 76.00 14201 1215/07 1,362.35 14202 12/5/07 452.35 14 203 12/5/07 163.75 14204 12/5/07 198.20 14205 12/5/07 190.87 14206 12,15/07 82.20 14207 12/5/07 122.89 14208 1215;07 74.49 14209 12/5/07 137.15 14210 12/6/07 36 1.80 14211 1216.107 18.66 14212 12.(7/07 111.28 14213 1217/07 142.00 14214 12/7/07 72.14 14215 12/7/07 201.70 14216 1217/07 1,127.10 14217 12/7107 479.70 Total $ 10,986.74 Grand Total 756,949.66 City of National City Warrant Register # 24 12/11/2007 001 GENERAL FUND 498,449.05 104 LIBRARY FUND -626.53 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 318.91 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 13.00 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 146,532. /4 136 1 INY TOT CLASSES FUND 317.77 254 LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION GRANT 252.00 290 POL ICE DEPT GRANTS 3,570.00 294 HUD HEALTHY HOMES GRAN I 315.00 302 CDC PAYMENTS 17,620.64 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 4,163.47 312 STP LOCALITRANSNET HIGHWAY 36,766.38 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 768.25 62 / LIABILITY INS. FUND 22,236.74 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 280.30 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 9,088.10 630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION 1,385.00 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 3,134.19 632 GENERAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 2,205.85 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 1,344.09 723 PROMO ITEMS FOR EMPLOYEE BENEFIT 160.00 724 COBRA/RETIREE INSURANCE 8,054.71 Total 756,949.66 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT METING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 (ITEM TITLE Public Hearing — Appeal of a Planning Commission Denial of a Planned Development Permit and Finding of No Siguficant Environmental Effect for a Three -Story Office Building including Retail Space and Structured Parking on an Approximately 1-Acre Vacant Lot on the North Side of East 8th Street, West of V Avenue (Applicant: Kamel Zayct) (Case File 2007-08 Pll) Oil — PREPARED BY Angela Ruder, 336-4310 DEPARTMENT planning EXPLANATION The project area is a one acre parcel on the north side of 8'h Street, just west of V Avenue. The site has frontage on both 7th and 8th Streets and is currently zoned Private Institutional (IP-PD). The applicant proposes to construct an office building on the lot. with close to 61,000 square feet of office and retail space. The applicant intends to provide medical office space to serve the surrounding area, in addition to providing space for a complementary retail use, such as a pharmacy. The proposed building includes four levels. Parking is proposed in the basement, with pedestrian and vehicle access from 7th Street. A retail suite, front lobby and additional parking arc located on the I" floor, with access from 8'h Street. The 2� and 3'1 floors consist of office suites situated around an internal landscaped courtyard. The building would meet all required setbacks and include a two-tone stucco exterior with stone veneer accents and light blue tinted glass windows. The front and west sides of the building are terraced with 7-9 tbot wide balconies on each of the upper floors. The project provides parking in excess of City requirements and a Negative Declaration was prepared by staff and determined no significant environmental effects would occur as a result of the proposal. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposal on December 3, 2007. One community member noted there did not seem to he a need for a pharmacy or more office space in the area, and expressed concerns about traffic on 8th Street. Commissioners voted to deny the project based on findings that the proposed use is not essential and desirable due to high volume of vacant medical office space available to lease, and that there is K„..., concern regarding parking, circulation and traffic (see attached resolution). The applicant has since filed an appeal of that decision to the Council. Environmental Review X N/A Exempt Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Stafrrecommends Approval of the p oposed Planned Development Permit, as well as the Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission denied the Planned Development Permit. Ayes — Alvarado, Baca, Flores, Reynolds, Del,aPaz Absent - Carillo, Pruitt ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) 1. Background Report, with Findings for Approval & Conditions of Approval 2. Planning Commission Rest). No. 68-2007, Including Findings for Denial Resolution No. 3. Location Map 6. Negative Declaration 4. Applicant's Appeal Request 7. Applicant's Plans (Exhibit A) 5. Department/Agency Comments A-200 (9/99) BACKGROUND REPORT PROJECT SITE The project area is approximately one acre parcel on the north side of E. 8th Street (APN: 557-140- 25), two parcels west of V Avenue. The parcel has 165 feet of frontage on both 7th and 8th Streets, and is approximately 260 feet deep. The project site is currently zoned Private institutional with a Planned Development overlay (IP-PD). It is relatively flat with only moderate sloping topography toward the rear and has been vacant for many years. The property is surrounded by multi -family apartments and townhomes to the north across 7th Street, a church parking lot and accessory building to the east, and single and two-family homes to the west and to the south across 8th Street. PROPOSAL The applicant proposes to construct an office building on the approximately one acre parcel. The proposed building would be three stories and between 47 and 52 feet in height, and include approximately 60,876 square feet of office and retail space, and two levels of parking (one below and one at -grade). The applicant's intent is to provide medical office space to serve the surrounding area, in addition to providing space for a retail use such as a pharmacy. Parking is proposed in a basement level and on the ground level of the building. In addition, an approximately 3,000 square feet retail space is proposed at street level at the front of the building with access from 8th Street. The upper two floors include all office suites situated around an internal courtyard that is open to the roof. The office space can be divided into multiple suites, with the ultimate size and number of suites dependant upon the occupants. Current plans call for thirty-one suites ranging from 1,300 to 2,700 square feet; however, the spaces could be combined to allow tenants to occupy a Larger space. As all parking is proposed inside, the building takes up the majority of the lot. A four foot setback is proposed on the east and west property lines, with a 5-foot rear setback, and a 10-foot front setback along 8th Street. In addition, the front of the building is terraced and steps back 7- feet on both the second and third floors, providing balconies and landscaping for tenants. The west side of the building also includes a 56-foot wide terraced area in the middle of the structure, with 9-foot balconies and Iandscaping on each of the upper two floors. Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the building and within the internal courtyard. Access to the parking garage would be provided by two driveways, one off of 8`h Street and one off of 7th Street. Each driveway accesses a different parking Ievel, each with entranccs to the building by an elevator and stairway. Total parking provided totals 217 spaces and includes 13 handicap spaces. The project includes a two-tone stucco exterior with stone veneer accents. In addition, typical of office buildings, there is a large percentage of fenestration utilizing a light blue tinted glass. A 1 of 54 three-story glass entry feature is proposed at the entrance on 8th Street and provides access to the foyer and pharmacy area. A pedestrian ramp is also proposed in front of the building to access the entrance from the 8th Street sidewalk. ANALYSIS The proposal to construct an office building to serve the hospital is consistent with several General Plan goals, including the express intent of the Private Institutional Zone and the incorporation of higher quality design. Additionally, the proposed building will utilize a currently vacant and underutilized site. The proposed development complies with Land Use Code requirements and incorporates many of the elements encouraged by City Design Guidelines. The project meets the height limits, setbacks, and parking requirements of the Code, providing 217 parking spaces where only 200 are required (Land Use Code section 18.58.280). A total of 5,263 square feet of landscaped area is proposed around the building, exceeding City requirements, in order to enhance the site and soften the visual impact on properties to the west. Also, the project includes replacing deteriorated portions of sidewalk adjacent to the site, as well as the landscape improvement along E. 8th Street. No exceptions are necessary to facilitate the proposed development. According to a'fraflic Impact Analysis dated September 21, 2007, by Federhart and Associates, the proposed project would not have a significant impact on traffic. The traffic study states that the proposed square footage of pharmacy and medical office space will result in approximately 3,130 average daily trips. Four different scenarios were considered (existing, existing plus project, 2010 without project and 2010 with project). In each cast, study intersections were found to continue without any capacity -related impacts, and study roadway segments were calculated to operate at LOS D or better, except for 8th Street east of Plaza Boulevard, which operated at LOS E with or without the project. Project improvements were proposed along 8th Street to provide additional storage for inbound left - turning vehicles. The applicant will re -stripe 8th Street to extend the left -turn lane at V Avenue westerly as a two-way left turn lane. This re -striping would remove left turning vehicles from the through lane of traffic. In addition, painting a red curb along the project area will reduce street parking for 5 properties on the south and 4 properties on the north; however, each of these sites have off-street parking available and there are additional opportunities for on -street parking in the area. These modifications to the existing striping plan along 8th Street further ensure that the project will significantly impact the arterial streets and intersections in the project area. A condition of approval was added to this effect. This project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the protection of environmental resources. Based on the review of the project and determination of no potential significant impacts, a Negative Declaration was prepared for the project (see Attachment 7). The 20-day public review period for this document ends on December 3, 2007. The City has received no comment letters during the review period. 2 of 54 Standard conditions of approval from the Engineering and Fire Departments have been incorporated as recommended conditions, as well as condition requiring a Sweetwater Authority easement across the property be vacated prior to issuance of any construction permits. Planning Commission Hearing The Planning Commission held a hearing on this application on December 3, 2007. One community member spoke stating that there is no need for a pharmacy and more office space in the area, in addition to concerns about traffic on 8th Street. Commissioners voted to deny the PD based on findings that the proposed use is not deemed essential and desirable due to high volume of vacant medical office space available to lease, and that there is concern regarding parking, circulation and traffic (see attached resolution). 3 of 54 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT I. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape, since the one acre property can accommodate the development of an approximately 142,000 square feet office building while meeting Land Use Code design regulations, and also provide the necessary parking and landscaping per Land Use Code requirements. 2. That the site has sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since a Traffic Study prepared for the project indicated that nearby local residential streets within the study area including E. 8th Street all have sufficient capacity to handle the additional trips caused by the project without suffering a significant decrease in their operating levels of service and the improvements to E. 8`h Street will be installed to extend the left tum lane as recommended by the traffic report. 3. That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent or abutting properties, since the project design complies with the design regulations of the Private Institutional (IP) Zone, and since the project includes additional conditions (i.e. landscaping, screening of mechanical equipment) designed to soften impacts on the established residential neighborhood to the west from the project site. 4. That the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare, since it results in the creation of additional office and retail space for the community which will complement the nearby hospital. It will also utilize a vacant parcel, and provide a structure with high quality design. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1. That the Negative Declaration (2007-08 IS) has been read and considered together with any comments received during the public review process; and, 2. That based on the whole record including the Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the cnviromnent and that the Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and analysis. 4 of 54 RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I. This Planned Development Permit (2007-08 PD) authorizes the development of an approximately 142,000 square -foot office building, including two floors of parking, two floors of office space, and a retail suite. Except as required by conditions of approval, all plans submitted for permits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibit A revised, case file no. 2007-08 PD, dated 11/04/2007. 2. A detailed landscape and automatic underground irrigation plan, including plant types, methods of planting, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of any building permits. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought tolerant planting and water conserving irrigation devices, landscape screening consisting of 5-15 gallon shrubs and trees along the west property line adjacent to homes to soften the visual impact and reduce glare on adjacent propertics, street trees a minimum of 15 gallon in size for every 40 feet of street frontage, and shrubs and groundcover between the curb and sidewalk. 3. The existing 10 foot wide Sweetwater Authority easement across the western edge of the property must be quitclaimed by the owner, at their expense, and proof submitted to the National City Planning Department prior to issuance of any grading or building permits. 4. A ten foot horizontal separation between sewer and water laterals is required. 5. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened from the sides and the top in accordance with City standards and shall be indicated on the building plans, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 6. The trash enclosure within the garage shall be provided in accordance with City standards. It shall be constructed of decorative block and solid gate to match the building design and to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The design of the trash enclosure shall be shown on the Landscape Plans. 7. All building permit plans must comply with the 2006 IBC as adopted by the 2007 CBC. 8. Television cable companies shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to filling of cable trenches. 9. Within 45 days of project approval, a revised parking layout and traffic report shall he submitted for review and approval to the satisfaction of the City Traffic Engineer. 10. All recommendations of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by Federhart and Associates and dated September 21, 2007 for the project, including extension of E. 81h Street left turn lane westerly to include the projects offstreet parking driveway and extension of red curbs along 8th Street, shall be completed prior to occupancy and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 11. A revised parking garage plan and traffic study shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Traffic Engineer within 45 days of project approval to address the Department's final comments. 12. A Ilydrology study (100 year flood) is required for the new project. The study should consider the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection point. The study should consider the adequacy of the existing storm drain system to convey any 5 of 54 additional run off. All Ilydrology study findings and recommendations are part of Engineering Departments requirements. 13. The Priority Project Applicability checklist for the Standard Urban Storm -water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) is required to be completed and submitted to the Engineering Department. The checklist will be required when a project site is submitted for review of the City Departments. The checklist is available at the Engineering Department. If it is determined that the project is subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" and the City of National City Storm Water Best Management Practices of the Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) an approved SUSMP will be required prior to issuance of an applicable engineering permit. The SUSMP shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. 14. The Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the maintenance of the proposed construction shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations which may require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. An approved SWPPP will he required prior to issuing of a construction permit. 15. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A private storm water treatment maintenance agreement shall be signed and recorded. A checklist for preparation of the grading plan/drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department. 16. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 17. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review, after Planning Commission approval. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch Class 11 aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall he in accordance with National City modified Standard Drawing G-34. All soils report findings and reconunendations shall he part of the Engineering Department requirements. 6 of 54 18. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements (10' of sidewalk) along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 19. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and any grading construction on private property. 20. A cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours and consultant services. 21. Exterior walls of buildings to a height of not less than 6-feet shall be treated with a graffiti resistant coating subject to approval from the Building and Safety 1irector. Graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours of its observance. 22. The project is to be designed, developed, and constructed in compliance with the California Fire Code (CFC) 2001 edition or CFC in effect at time of permit issuance and the most current National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards as adopted by the City of National City. 23. Fire Protection plans are to be submitted directly to the Fire Department for permitting and review. A standpipe system will be required in conjunction with the fire sprinkler system, to the satisfaction of the Fire Iepartment. 24. Before this Planned Development Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Department, acknowledging and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the Planned Development Permit. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that conditions imposed by approval of the Planned Development Permit are binding on all present or future interest holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation. 25. Approval of the Planned Development Permit expires one (1) years after adoption of the resolution of approval at 5:30 p.m. unless prior to that date a request for a time extension not exceeding three (3) years has been filed as provided by National City Municipal Code § 17.04.070. 26. Within four (4) days of approval, pursuant to Fish and Game Code 711.4 and the California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 753.5, the applicant shall pay all necessary environmental filing fees for the San Diego County Clerk. Checks shall he made payable to the County Clerk and submitted to the National City Planning Department. At this time, the filing fee is $50 for a Notice of Exemption or Notice of Determination, $1,850 for a 7 of 54 Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration, and $2,550 for an Environmental Impact Report. 8 of 54 RESOLUTION NO. 68-2007 A RESOLUTION OF TILE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA, DENYING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A THREE-STORY OFFICE BIJILDING INCLUDING RETAIL SPACE AND STRUCTURED PARKING ON AN APPROXIMATELY 1-ACRE VACANT I.O'I' ON THE NORTH SIDE OF EAST 8Tll STREET, WEST OF V AVENUE APPLICANT: KAMEL ZAYAT CASE FILE NO. 2007-08 PD, IS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City considered a Planned Development Permit for a three-story office building including retail space and structured parking on an approximately 1-acre vacant lot on the north side of East 8°i Street, west of V Avenue at a duly advertised public hearing held on December 3, 2007 at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WI IEREAS, at said public hearing the Planning Commission considered the stall report contained in Case File No. 2007-08 PD, IS maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing; and, WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by State law and City law; and, WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation of public health, safety, and general welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on December 3, 2007 fail to support findings, required by the Municipal Code for granting any Planned Development Permit that the proposed use will not have an adverse effect on adjacent or abutting properties, and that the proposed use is deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience or welfare. BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED by the City Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning Commission at the public hearing held on December 3, 2007 supports the following findings: 9 of 59 I. The site would have an adverse effect on adjacent properties since the proposed medical office building would create traffic conflicts and reduced traffic flow along East 8th Avenue, since the parking garage is proposed as two independent levels .creating the potential for clients and employees to enter and exit to search for parking resulting in disruption of traffic along the East 8'h Street and increased traffic along East 7th Street. 2. The proposed development would not be consistent with the General Plan which discourages disruption of traffic along major arterials and encourages limiting left turns out of commercial driveways: 3. The proposed use is not deemed essential and desirable to the public convenience and welfare since there are numerous medical office buildings within close proximity to the site and other uses permitted within the Private Institutional Zone should be explored that would offer services not available elsewhere in the community. 4. That the proposed medical office building would be incompatible with the surrounding residential community since it is out of scale with the neighborhood as surrounding structures are limited to two stories whereas the proposed development would be three stories, the office use would result in over viewing into adjacent residences to the west, and the proposed medical building would offer minimal architectural relief along the eastern and western elevations. 5. That the proposed development is not consistent with the General Plan policy to protect established residential neighborhoods from non-residential development which might affect the stability of the neighborhood and quality of life, since it will introduce a large office building into an existing established residential neighborhood. BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission denies said application for Planned Development Permit. BE IT FURTIIER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council. BE I'l' FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the•Planning Commission resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing. The time within which judicial review of this decision may be sought is governed by the provisions of Code of Civil Procedures Section 1094.6. 10 of 54 CER'1IFICATION: This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting of December 17, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: Alvarado, Baca, Flores, Reynolds, DeLaPaz NAYS: ABSENT: Carrillo ABSTAIN: Pruitt CHAIRWOMAN 11 of 54 100 100 200 300 Feet PROPOSED — —�� PROJECT AREA LOCATION MAP Planned Development Permit for a New Medical Office Building on a Vacant Lot on E. 8th Street, West of V Avenue 2007-08 PD NATIONAL C2IOt PLANNING DRN. DATE- 6/18/07 INITIAL HEARING: 12/03/07 rrom:W A tNb1NttK!NU IN ?25 bib 'Lib.' 1Z/ZU/LW/ 7FW/ N,UUL CASA Engineering, Inc. STRUCTURAL DESIGN AND ANALYSIS 9225 Dowdy Drive Suite 220 San Diego CA 92126 Tel(858) 695-2761, Fax (858) 695-3367 Date: Dec 18, 2007 Case 4 2007-08 PD Medical Office @ 8ei street and V Ave. Objective: Filling an appeal From :Dr. Kamel Zayat, Owner To: City National of National City Mrs. Angela Reeder, Associate Planner Dear Mrs. Angela Reeder: I am asking the City of National City to appeal the decision made by the planning commission's base on the following reason: 1- Traffic Study a) The traffic impact study done by the traffic Engineer Mr. James Federhart and approved by the city engineer show that they this building will has no significant impact on the arterial street and the intersection area. b) The planning commission needs to know that: the 8T1' is a major artery for this IP zoning, that mean this street was design originally for this kind of buildings. And the people how live in this area need to know this street is an important artery for the welfare of the zoning arca. 2- Vacancy issue: a) The vacancy signs on the existing Medical building in the area is due the fact, the new owner for the Paradise Hospital has cancel many contract with the doctors who used work in the hospital, which cause many doctors to leave and create too many empty medical offices. This situation will be improved when the Paradise Hospital has new contracts with new doctors. b) Any one will drive in this IP zoning will thing they may be an economical problem in the area. In the same time, When we drive outside this IP zoning area we will find there 13 of 54 Lroo.Us,SA !=k'G1'\'ET!N'? 'NC r^1 SE5 27S' '9 77 n '?: ? .�Y, ��.� 1.1 .,'. `.�..��! �..)� are mazy new develcpments and niany new constructions, especially on 8TH stre::t This c norrice1 contradiction between this .LP zone: End the surrounding to ea will chan;it, whsn the new constructions is completed. c) rhe: City of N:3tiorial City need to know, it's very difficult to believe that this .:,c ding vacancy problem is due gobble economic problem in vicinity of the San Diego a:+aa. At the time where there are many new developments In National City an,i the neighbor's area :is going or.. 3- Senior citizen housings: La addiction to the new residential unit bui;d on 8m street. The City of National city -Itas just approved 500 units for senior citizen. This situation will require the 'wed for more doctors to Serve this community. 4- Coalition of existing building :Ind Zoning imprave:otent. On 81h :greet there are old medical office': buildings in bad condi'o.on. The quality; of the construction in the City and county of San Diego has been improved in the last 15 years dramat call y. Its very difficult for good quality doctors to open a new business in these kind of old buildings. Our building is a first class quality facility it wifl attract Min quality doctors whia axe going to improve the entire IP zoning area and the City of Nationtd. If the city want to improve the quality of living in the city they need to improve the quality of construction, other wise the bad become worst without changing the existing condition ofthe zoning. 5- Historical decision. The decision to designate this arca to be an IP zoning was made by the City of National City long time ago, probably one 100 years ago. This kind of decision was base or the: need act only for the City of National City but also on the need for the area surrounding The City of National City. After all these years, It's very difficult to believe that the decision for this zoning was wrong and this zoning need to be change. 6- The Future of this IP zoning and retirement of the Baby Boomer. The location of our City on the Mexican Eloarder, and the climate arc attracting a lot of people and retirees in the US to come to county of San Diego. In 20] 0 the retirement of the Baby boomer will start. Every one is talking about the need to cover the need of these retirees. These retirees will needs doctors, nurses and medical services. Having a ,good Medical Facility in National City will attract more retirees and create more business for the City of National City. :.4 of 54 1 1 gill•MI 1 L1 •l.Ill•LLI\lIM 111,, VW WJ L/V1 1✓4W LtNJ 4V • V\J rtW1 1 •W1 7- The improvement hi City of San Diego downtown In the last 10 years, The City of San Diego Downtown area has been change from City of Homeless to high class, quality, and high density area this is going to attacks a lot people to the entire county of San Diego,. National City is at the Boarder the City of San Diego, having good doctors the this vicinity is going to attract a lot of business in the medical service. 7- , The Pharmacy, gift store and Dell. Our decision to have a pharmacy, gift and small Deli in the building is the service medical and there clients in the building. This kind of service is just for convening. It's true they may be there are 6 existing pharmacy in the area, however our pharmacy, gift store and Deli is to serve the building. As a citizen of this country I believe in the future of the City Of National City. Having a good Medical facility it will improve The neighborhood, The City of National City and the County of San Diego. Base on these above observation, I am asking the planning department, planning commission, and the city of National City to approve our new Medical office building. Sincerely yours Dr. Kernel Zayat Ph.DJP.EJ S.E. rY('' 15 of 54 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT Phone: (619) 336-4550 M EMORANDUM DATE: February 13, 2007 TO: Angela Reeder, Associate Planner FROM: Donald Condon, Battalion Chief! Fire Marshal SUBJECT: Case File No: 2007-08 PD, Medical Office at 8th Street and "V" Avenue Please note our following comments and recommendations: 1) Project to be designed, developed and constructed in compliance with the California Fire Code (C:FC) 2001 edition or CPC in effect at time of permit issuance and the most current National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standards as adopted by the City of National City. 2) Vicinity Map reflect project to be outside of National City. 'this needs to he corrected. 3) Fire Protection plans are to be submitted directly to the Fire Department for permitting and review. Standpipe system will be required in conjunction with the fire sprinkler system. Please note that the above items are based off of a preliminary review of plans submitted. Additional requirements may be necessary upon submission of a complete set of plans for permit review. 16 of 54 City of National City Office of the City Engineer 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4380 Fax: (619) 336-4397 ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE MEDICAL OFFICE AT 8T" STREET WEST OF "V" AVENUF, Date: February 15, 2007 To: Angela Reeder, Planning Department From: Adam J. Landa, Assistant Civil Engineer l-xwK Via• Stephen M. Kirkpatrick, City Engineer Subject: MEDICAL OFFICE A'1' 8"1 STREET WEST OF "V" AVENUE A Hydrology study (100 year flood) is required for the new project. The study should consider the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection point. The study should consider the adequacy of the existing storm drain system to convey any additional run off. All Hydrology study findings and recommendations are part of Engineering Departments requirements. The Priority Project Applicability checklist for the Standard Urban Storm -water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) is required to be completed and submitted to the Engineering Department. The checklist will be required when a project site is submitted for review of the City Departments. The checklist is available at the Engineering Department. If it is determined that the project is subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" and the City of National City Storm Water Best Management Practices of the Jurisdictional Urban Runoff Management Program (JURMP) an approved SUSMP will be required prior to issuance of an applicable engineering permit. The SUSMP shall be prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer. The Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the maintenance of the proposed construction shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations which may require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project. An approved SWPPP will be required prior to issuing of a construction permit. 17 of. 54 ® Recycled Paper 4. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A private storm water treatment maintenance agreement shall be signed and recorded. A checklist for preparation of the grading plan/drainage plan is available at the Engineering Department. 5. A sewer permit will be required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall he shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in size with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. 6. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review, after Planning Commission approval. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall be 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City modified Standard Drawing G-34. All soils report findings and recommendations shall he part of the Engineering Department requirements. 7. The deteriorated portions of the existing street improvements (10' of sidewalk) along the property frontages shall be removed and replaced. 8. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the public right-of-way, and any grading construction on private property. AL:jha medical A cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours and consultant services. 18 of 54 EETWATER AUTHORI . 1 505 GARRETT AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91912-2328 (619) 420-1413 FAX (619) 425-7469 http ltwww.sweetwater.org February 20, 2007 Ms. Angela Reeder, Associate Planner City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 GOVERNING BOARD R. MITCHEL BEAUCHAMP, CI IAIR JAMES C. ALKIRE, VICE CHAIR JAMES "JIM' DOUR RON MORRISON W.D.'BUD- POCKLINGTON TERRY THOMAS MARGARET COOK WFI.SH DENNIS A. BOSTAD GENERAL MANAGER MARK N. ROGERS OPERATIONS MANAGER Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY 8th STREET, WEST OF V AVENUE, NATIONAL CITY CASE FILE NO. 2007-08 PD SWA DEV. FILE: NATIONAL CITY PARADISE MEDICAL BUILDING, 8TH STREET, WEST OF V AVENUE, NATIONAL CITY Dear Ms. Reeder: This letter is in response to a Planned Development Permit for the subject property, within the Sweetwater Authority (Authority) service area. There is a 6-inch water main located on the north side of 7th Street, and an 8-inch water main located on the north side of 8th Street, adjacent to the proposed development. Authority records indicate that there is one (1) domestic water service to this parcel. There is also an easement in favor of the Authority along the western edge of the property (see attached copy of 3-SW-155). The easement can be quitclaimed by the Owner, at their expense, since there are no facilities in this easement. Enclosed is a copy of 1/4 SEC. 130 map, which shows the existing water facilities. At this time, the Authority cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide fire protection for this project. As plans develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements, as well as a site plan, street improvement plan, irrigation plan, plumbing plan (showing total fixture -unit count), fire sprinkler plans, and calculations (if fire services are required). All services should be clearly shown on the plan within the Authority's standards. Based on this requirement, the Authority will determine if there is a need for new water systems or substantial alteration to the existing water system. It is recommended that your agency work with the Authority to determine if the existing water facilities are adequate to meet the added demands, prior to issuing a building permit. The Owner will also need to provide the estimated water demand in gallons per day for commercial and landscaping uses. A PubIN vales #gency Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas Ms. Angela Reeder Re: Water Availability — 8th Street, west of V Avenue, National City February 20, 2007 Page 2 of 2 Please note that the Authority requires a ten -foot horizontal separation between sewer and water laterals. If the Owner provides the required fire flow information and enters into an agreement with the Authority for water facility improvements, if required, water service can be obtained at a pressure of approximately 68 psi. If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Laurie Edwards at (619) 409-6758. Sincerely, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY ector Martinez Engineering Manager HM:LJE:vls enclosures: copy of easement 3-SW-155 copy of 1/4 SEC. 130 map cc: Don Condon, Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal National City Fire Department 140 East 12th Street, Suite A National City, CA 91950 Kamel Zayat 9225 Dowdy Drive, Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92126 I:\engr\Dev\National City Paradise Medical Building\reeder_wtravl_ncpar_med.doc 20 of 54 EASEMENT 3-SW-155 From: Van Pelt,Powelson & Freeman Date: March 22, 1950 (10' R/W por. 80Ac.Lot 2„ Sec.130) Recorded 3- 0-50,Bk. 561,Pg.454, S.D.County (original) Po; SWEETWATER DISTRICT .+. t. co. sjw•,o-aa 21 of 54 r ,:r•• 7,1 ri: SAL X 1!!:=1.4).0/. SQ • F-T. ei`C> ANc. .14-5 •: • 5't,c24 Ov1. -° . 11••4 44 '• • • -; • : : . . • • . • . . . • . • • . • -71-L . t • I 1. I • 157r; . • 2 of 54. State of CALIFORNIA ) County of SAN DIEGO ) ss On y� naau w a.S�'Lo•�aQ�� forMarch known to•.,m0 the person whose name is are subscribed to the foregoing in - strum n' jii ledged to me that he executed the same. �p.,•'�;a='=.: fitness my hand and official seal the day and year in this Certificate irst above written. • • Notary Public inf ' d for said County -- : ' . • r `' • State State of CALIFORNIA ) County of 3AN DIECO j ss 404561 RGE455 for s On �$1 fib. 1950 before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and P,d State known '{_ personally appeared Harrison R. Freeman and Anna J. Freeman a'xle7� o''�Nperson whose name is are subscribed to the foregoing in- struine2ft and ae�tli •v edged to me that he executed the same. • ; )i�itness my hand and official seal the day and year : '.� <Y in this Certificate - r •- ,. ate first above writt — - _ p G 0'C, .' Notary Public in a for said County and tate Hy coroy sx4t,V E.c";e62 - GCf /1,.,e06b 23 of 54 nnx 3561 PAGE 454 EASEMENT .3 -5L -fSS' MARSHALL C. VAN PELT and ARLENE R. VAN PELT, husband and wife; ROBERT POWELSON and DOROTHY E. POWELSON, husband and wife; HARR*SON H. FREEMAN and ANNA J. FREEMAN, husband and wife, for and in consideration of tbe sum of One Dollar ($1.00) receipt of wbicb is hereby acknowledged, do bereby grant to CALIFORNIA WATER & TELEPHONE COMPANY, a California corporation, its successors or assigns, an easement for tbe purposes of laying, relaying, maintaining, repairing and/or renewing a water main or mains and appurtenances, thereto, over, upon, along across, through and under a strip of land described as follows: The Easterly 10 feet of the Northerly 621.91 feet of the South Half of the West Quarter of tbe East Half of 80 Acre Lot 2 in Quarter Section 130 of Rancho de la Nacion, and also over the Northerly 10 feet of tbe Easterly 31.01 feet of the said South Half of the West Quarter of tbe East Half of 80 Acre Lot 2, Quarter Section 130, of Rancho de la Nacion, according to Map tbereof No. 166, filed in tbe office of tbe County Recorder of San Diego County. Together with tbe rigbt of ingress to and egress from the above described parcel of land for tbe purposes of laying, relaying, maintaining, repairing and/or renewing said water main or mains and appurtenances thereto. The Grantor agrees tbat no buildings, structures, trees, nor plantings of a permanent nature will be erected or planted upon the easement above described. Dated: 41.. 1950. / • 24 of 54 California Water k Telephone Co. P.O. Box Fje National City, California. roo0loff In 36131 mono ar mar a. VAR 801960 BOa3561nu.4 .eon rwoaoe Pet Slip Cala% Cilkall 3111.111111.0•411miii KAM COMM 916_.:;N 25 of 54 200 100 0 Existing Water Facilities subject Property; :National City Paradise Medical Building APN 5571402500 National City 1%4SEC. 130 200 Feet • Fire Hydrants — i♦ w - Water Mains S 26 of 5 4Water Services IA, V. _.Yvelq.0 by $.Mb9Ct Pam., Iu tirmN bare9/c, M, n.not Only.J b pONh bJlb QYl — No. nal Ca used b m)' Geer Ivpovn .NxtM tapes, Wan M..�..:n.1 brvMaW 9 .04 •T'?.+.wl,wMpral. o9 .Ip lane Avon ITY'A.A. f,A 9:912.232n 0,1ytA.14n )All :e191 ero 1*9 lneYw al♦ 1v. b0 t4 [Is apses.n9. (1e,. eeaw eb wc9.a 9wao.9rn ,.. n nva• kid bmbal noose Wi99.,. mMW 4tlb. Cal 11 i A () 199111422-.1 ) Too. I'.aNv r.e09h ✓ia..M9 nep A pepbery n9enlb,1 11re w 0.OYc MPmabpr n 1.vbuN >ie[rw7M cn, NI, caul..., or MNMrna1.�' M1.liriq e.aF1b utl[.r/,9 apttme,n 1.610 t.99,.,0 Arno., Gut 1*.' Op., U 9]11.1 !tQ by. Loon. Wrnk; 1.4ny NAN'su'411:NV&wnnptwrnvV0A11 groveplaza. 0.1 I. PROJECT TITLE/PROJECT #: Planned Development Permit for a new office and retail building on an approximately one acre, vacant lot on the north side of 8'h Street, west of V Avenue (2007-08 PD) 2. LEAD AGENCY: Contact: Phone: 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: Contact Phone: City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Angela Reeder, AICP, Associate Planner (619)336-4310 One parcel totaling approximately 43,065 square feet and bounded by 7th and 8`h Streets to the north and south, west of V Avenue, within the City of National City. KamelZayat 9225 Dowdy Drive., Suite 220 San Diego, CA 92126 (858) 695-2761 5. COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ IP-PD (Private Institutional, Planned Development Overlay) ZONING DESIGNATION: 6. ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS: Planned Development Permit (2007-08 PD) 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes to construct a new office building on an approximately one acre vacant parcel on the north side of 8th Street, just west of V Avenue (APN: 557- 140-25). The new building will include approximately 60,876 square feet of office and pharmacy/retail space, and two levels of parking (one below and one at -grade) with 217 spaces. The 58,700 square feet of office space is proposed within the two floors above the parking area and a pharmacy is proposed at street level fronting on 8th Street. Landscaping is proposed around the perimeter of the new office building and within an internal courtyard. 27 of 54 Initial Study - Page 2 of 17 Access to the site will be through two driveways, one from 8th Street and one from 7th Street. Parking provided for the entire project totals 217 spaces, containing more than the respective parking required by the National City Land Use Code for a new office building. The building can he divided into multiple suites, with the ultimate size and number of suites dependant upon the occupants. Current plans call for thirty-one suites ranging from 1,300 to 2,700 square feet; however, the spaces could be combined to allow tenants to occupy a larger space. 8. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): N/A ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or is "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Biological Resources • Geological Problems Ll Land Use / Planning ❑ Public Services ❑ Agriculture ❑ Air Quality ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Energy & Mineral Resources O Hazards & Hazardous Materials 0 Hydrology /Water Quality O Noise ❑ Population / Housing • Recreation C7 Transportation/Circulation ❑ Utilities & Service Systems 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this Initial Evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. X 28 of 54 Initial Study - Page 3 of 17 I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as describexl on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or is "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effect that remains to be addressed. Printed Name: Angela Reeder, AICP Date Title: Associate Planner EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off -site as well as on - site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, Less than significant with mitigation, or Icss than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence than an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an FIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less than Significant w/ Mitigation Incorporated" applied where the incorporation of a mitigation measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to "Less then Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). 6. I.cad agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This in only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whichever format is selected. 29 of 59 Initial Study - Page 4 of 17 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources I. AESTHETICS Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4) b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4) d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime Views in the area? (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation 1. l rJ U x CI I_.I L_.J x IJ J [1 x U n IJ x There are no designated scenic vistas nearby or across the proposed project site. As such, no vistas would be adversely impacted by the proposed project and there is no impact. Also, while there are a handful of private parcels adjacent to west whose views would be altered by the proposed project, the City does not have a policy to protect private viewsheds. The project site is at an elevation below the surrounding multi -family properties to the north and construction of the project would not impact views of these properties. The proposed project site is currently a relatively flat, vacant lot without any scenic resources. It is located within an urbanized area and surrounded by single and multi -family residential uses, a church, various medical/commercial development and a major freeway. The proposed building will be taller than current development on the adjacent parcels to the east and west, including a church parking lot/storage area and single-family homes. To soften the visual impact' of the structure, the architecture of the medical office center includes several elements such as a stepped front elevation, with two levels of landscaped patio area. The applicant has also proposed recessed, landscaped portions of the building adjacent to the residential parcels to the west, and landscape boxes along the eastern elevation adjacent to a church parking lot. The applicant has also used varied materials (stone, stucco, glass) along the elevations to avoid the appearance of a solid, blank wall. As such, development of the site would change the existing visual character compared to the current vacant lot, but would have no adverse impacts to the visual character of the site. City ordinances require commercial projects to be well lit for pedestrian and vehicular safety reasons; however, lighting generated by the site would also be required to follow City ordinances requiring shielding of light fixtures to eliminate spillage onto neighboring properties and public rights -of -way. In addition, the majority of the lighting on -site fin - pedestrians and vehicles would be within the structure, as all project parking is provided indoors. Therefore, there would not be a significant impact from the proposed project. 30 of 54 Initial Study - Page 5 of 17 II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation & Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? (Sources: 1, 4) b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? (Sources: I, 4) c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non- agricultural use? (Sources: 1, 4) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation L1 x National City is a primarily built -out community and there is no farmland mapped or planned to be mapped within the City, or more specifically on the project site. Also, the proposed project site is currently zoned for commercial use. No Williamson Act contract is associated with the land and there would be no impact to farmland. III. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? (Sources: 4, 9) h) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? (Sources: 4, 9) c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? (Sources: 4, 9) d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? (Sources: 4, 9) d) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? (Sources: 4, 9) Potentially Less than Less 'I'han No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation D ❑ x LI U U x IJ LJ L I x n n x The County of San Diego is in attainment for all Califomia Clean Air Act (CCAA) pollutants with the exception of ozone. As the proposed office building project does not include any design components that would be contrary to the Regional Air Quality Strategy for San Diego County (RAQS), the proposed project would have no impact. 31 of 54 Initial Study - Page 6 of 17 The proposed project includes the construction of a new medical office building on an approximately one acre site. "Ile Regional Air Quality Strategy for San Diego County (RAQS) notes that the County is not in attainment for ozone and identifies several control measures to reduce emissions. The control measures deal primarily with industrial uses and design changes to specific products that will reduce emission, and not with office design. The proposed office building would not contribute substantially to ozone levels and would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation and would therefore have no significant impact. Emissions resulting from developing the site would be directly related to the amount of vehicular traffic generated by the facility. A traffic analysis dated September 21, 2007, calculated that the project would generate 3130 ADT, primarily resulting from the office space visits. The traffic analysis concluded that the construction would not have any significant traffic impacts on the arterial network near the project, resulting in acceptable intersection and road segment operation. Consequently, while the proposed project would have an incremental impact to area -wide air -quality resulting from the cumulative impacts of thousands or sources, the individual impacts attributed to this project are incredibly small on a regional scale and will not cause ambient air -quality standards to be exceeded or have a significant impact on air quality. The proposed project site is adjacent to a freeway, is surrounded by residential development on three sides. Also, the proposed project site is within a mile of a hospital, two elementary schools, and a proposed senior residential project, all of which are considered sensitive receptors. However, the proposed office building is not a type of development that would expose those receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. As such, there is no significant impact to neighboring sensitive receptors. In addition, as a new office building on a one acre site, the project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people: therefore, there is nu impact. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) I lave a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDBG) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service'? (Sources: 1, 4) b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) or US Fish and Wildlife Service? (Sources: 1, 4) c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? (Sources: I, 4, 5) d) interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? (Sources: I, 4) e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? (Sources: i, 4) Potentially Less Than Less "I'han No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation u 32 of 54 initial Study - Page 7 of 17 Based on a physical inspection of the property, the proposed project site has been previously developed and is disturbed. Also, no jurisdictional wetlands, other sensitive habitat, or sensitive species were detected on the property; and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service maps indicate that there are no jurisdictional wetlands or jurisdictional waters of U.S. or state -defined streamheds on site. The project site is located completely within an urbanized area, surrounded by development and contains no sensitive habitats or biological resources that are protected by local policies or ordinances. There are also no adopted habitat conservation plans known that include the proposed project site; therefore, there is no impact_ V. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? (Sources: 1, 4) b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? (Sources: 1, 4) c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? (Sources: 1, 4) d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries'? (Sources: 4) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation L! L7 nEJ i1 x LJ x No historical or archaeological resources as defined in Section 15064.5 arc known to exist on the proposed project site and there are no recorded archaeological sites nearby. Additionally, the developed nature of the area, including roads, a freeway and the surrounding commercial and residential properties suggest there is no impact to historical or archaeological resources. There are no known unique geologic or paleontological features on the proposed project site or within the surrounding area; therefore, there is no impact to these unique resources. No cultural resource constraints are known to exist on the previously disturbed project site. As such, there is a relatively low probability of disturbing any hurnan remains and no significant impact. In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains during construction, the applicant shall take all appropriate steps as required by relevant federal, state, and local laws. Vi. GEOLOGY & SOILS Would the project: Potentially Less' Ian Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. (Sources: 4, 6) ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? (Sources: 4, 6) iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? (Sources: 4, 33 of 54 Initial Study - Page 8 of 17 6, 11) iv) Landslides? (Sources: 4, 6, 11) b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? (Sources: 4) c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on - or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse"? (Sources: 4, 6, 11) d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? (Sources: 4) c) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (Sources: 2, 4) n IJ TJ �J U Cl x California Geological Survey information indicates the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone, and there are no known active or potentially active faults that intercept the project site; therefore, the potential for ground rupture at this site is considered low. Accordingly, the site is not considered to possess a significantly greater seismic risk than that of the surrounding area in general. it should be recognized that Southern California is an area that is subject to some degree of seismic risk and that it is generally not considered economically feasible nor technologically practical to build structures that are totally resistant to earthquake -related hazards. Construction in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Uniform Building Code should minimize damage due to seismic events. Due to the number and nature of the active and non -active fault lines within the southern California region, it can not he known when earthquakes will occur; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. California Geological Survey information indicates the site is not within an area susceptible to landslides and not within a fault zone, slide prone area or an area susceptible to liquefaction; therefore there is no impact or increased exposure to landslides due to the proposed project. The project site is currently vacant and has little or no vegetation upon it. Proposed plans include substantial hardscape and all additional open areas arc proposed to be landscaped; therefore, there is no impact or increased substantial erosion due to the proposed project. According to California Geological Survey information, the relative landslide susceptibility classification of the site falls outside the boundaries of known landslides. Additionally, while the existing site is relatively flat, the project site will undergo significant grading in order to provide for below -grade parking. The project will be designed to achieve adequate stability through appropriate grading standards and soil testing. The proposed project site would have traditional sewer laterals, which will connect with the existing sewer system that serves the City. There would be no use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems; therefore, no impact. VII. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of ha'ardous materials? (Sources: 4) :34 of 54 Potentially I.ess Than I.ess Tban No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation L J LJ Initial Study - Page 9 of 17 b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? (Sources: 4) c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? (Sources: 1,4,7) d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (Sources: 4, 6, 12) e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: I, 4) 1) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (Sources: 1, 4) g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk ()floss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (Sources: 1, 4) IJ r1 n f? x rl x I1 x While there is a small degree of hazardous material usage associated with the operation of any medical facility, such as mercury in thermometers, this is reduced in medical offices and there have been advances in most medical apparatus in order to reduce or deal with the use of these substances. in addition, the proposed medical office building is not expected to generate any materials that cannot be easily managed or discharged in accordance with accepted procedures; therefore, no impacts would occur. The proposed project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous material sites. Also, according to California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DISC) information, there are no "Cortese List" locations in National City and the nearest school is approximately a half -mile away from the subject site. The proposed project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport, nor is it in the vicinity of a private airstrip; therefore no impact or safety hazard would occur. The proposed project site is located within an urbanized area on currently undeveloped property. Plans include the use of existing streets and would not therefore interfere with any emergency or evacuation plans. The sites location within an existing urbanized area with no wildlands at or adjacent to the site also results in no impact or exposure to wildland fires would occur. VIii. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) Potentially Less 1 han Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation x 35 of 54 Initial Study - Page 10 of 17 b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 10) c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off - site? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 11) d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 11) e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13) f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 11) h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 11) i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 11) j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 11) iJ n -- Ii x iJ x II x x LJ r. I x The proposed project is subject to state and local stormwater requirements including appropriate design features that adequately address water quality discharge requirements; therefore, there would be no significant impact. Also, the site is located in an urbanized developed area and includes appropriate construction and permanent best management practices that would not significantly impact water quality. 'fhe proposed project site has no streams or rivers at or near the site. The requirements of the permit would control drainage on -site and not create an adverse effect to the natural drainage pattern of the site. The project will also be subject to state and local stormwater requirements, including appropriate drainage facilities to ensure adequate drainage on -site or into a city stormwater facility. Development of the project will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff and create flooding, nor will it create substantial erosion or siltation; therefore, there would be no significant impact. The area is not within a failure area of a levee or dam; therefore, there would be no exposure of people or structures to any significant risks. 'The site is located also outside the boundaries of both the 100-year and 500-year flood zones and is several miles inland from the San Diego Bay and other water features that would create the natural disasters mentioned above: therefore, there is no impact. 36 of 54 Initial Study - Page 11 of 17 IX. LAND USE & PLANNING Would the project: Potentially i.ess Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Physically divide an established community? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) n IJ x b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an Li I J x agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to 1 the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) The proposed project area includes a parcel along an existing corridor along E. 8th Street that is currently zoned for private institutional and two-family residential uses. Properties along the north side of 8th Street are intended for institutional use to the east and two-family residential to the west North of the project site, across 7'h Street, the zoning and land uses change to multi -family residential use. However, as the proposed office development is consistent with the City General Plan zoning and with the adjacent development to the east along the condor, the proposal would not physically divide an established community. In contrast, any other type of development on the site would be inconsistent with the development plan of the neighborhood. In addition, the General Plan specifically intends for uses that are complementary to the adjacent Paradise Valley Hospital within the Private Institutional zone, which the proposal would accomplish. There are no applicable plans in place to avoid or mitigate environmental effects that would be in conflict with the proposed project. X. MINERAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? (Sources: I, 2, 4) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (Sources: I, 2, 4) Potentially Less Than I.ess Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant impact Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation There are no known regional or locally -important mineral resources on the proposed project site; therefore, there is no impact. XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) h) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? (Sources: 1. 2, 4) c) A substantial permanent increase in atnbient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) Potentially Less than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant impact Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation U iJ 37 of 54 Initial Study - Page 12 of 17 d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) c) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) t) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) r.J 1 rl x x The project area is approximately 1 block from an elevated freeway (interstate 805), within an area of the National City General Plan Noise Contour Map subject to 65 decibels of ambient freeway noise. The proposed development will comply with requirements of the State Building Code and City ordinances with regard to noise for commercialiofficc projects, as well as City requirements for shielding of rooftop equipment. This requirement will be incorporated into project's structural plans. Additionally, the proposed parking for the office building will be largely below grade, resulting in less impact to nearby residences. Although noise impacts created by traffic and trash removal activities may create temporary increases in ambient noise levels, the overall project is not anticipated to result in permanent exterior noise levels in excess of existing noise levels; therefore there is no impact. Some temporary increase in ambient noise levels can be expected during the construction phase, but it will be conducted in accordance with the City's noise ordinance and is of a limited duration and thus not a significant impact. The project by its nature as a office/retail building would not typically generate groundbome vibration or noise levels in excess of local standards. Also, the noise generated from the construction phase of the project will he conducted in accordance with the City's noise ordinance and is of a limited duration; therefore, there is no impact. The proposed project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport. Nor is it within the vicinity of a private airstrip; therefore, there is no impact. XIi. POPULATION & HOUSING Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) h) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) Potentially Less Than Less 'Iban No Significant Significant wi Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation r7 r x The proposed project includes the construction of an approximately 60,000 square -feet of office space and its associated parking, with no new infrastructure off -site. in addition, there is no existing housing on the project site. While unlikely, the project does have the a remote potential to bring in additional workers to the area .Yet, any population growth expected from the project would be negligible and result in no adverse impact or population growth as a result of this project. Potentially Less Than Less Than No 38 of 54 Initial Study- Page 13 of 17 XIII. PURLiC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13) Police protection? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13) Schools? (Sources: I, 2,4) Parks? (Sources: 1, 2,4) Other public facilities? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to tire or police protection services. The project area is currently, and will continue to be, served by the National City Fire and Police Departments. Typical response time for this neighborhood would not be adversely impacted, as plans do not reduce current access points to the property. Also, the development will generate impact fees for Fire/EMS and Police services that will supplement any additional requirements brought about by the development; therefore, there is no impact. The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to City schools. The local school system has seen declining enrollment for the past several years and thus there is space available in all the system's schools. However, the project does have the potential to bring in additional employees to the area and, thus, the potential for additional school -age children. Yet, any population growth expected would be negligible and as school -specific impact fees will be collected as part of the construction permit process to offset any impacts, a less than significant impact is expected. The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to City parks or other pubic facilities, as the project includes the construction of a shopping center, with no residential component. As such, there is no impact. XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? (Sources: 2, 4) b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (Sources: 2, 4) Potentially Leas Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact impact Mitigation impact Incorporation Ll ! .1 �J x The proposed project is the construction of a medical office building with no recreational component that would create no new demand on local recreational facilities; therefore, there is no impact. 39 of 54 Initial Study - Page 14 of 17 XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRA FFIC Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 8) h) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? (Sources: I, 2, 4, 8) c) Result in a change in air traflic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 8) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (c.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? (Sources: I, 2, 4, 8) c) Result in inadequate emergency access? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 8) f) Result in inadequate parking capacity'? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 8) g) Conflict with adopted policies plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 8, 12) Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation n ri f -1 Ll x Ll x x n I 1 I-.l x According to a Traffic Impact Analysis dated September 21, 2007, by Fcderhart and Associates, the proposed project would not have a significant impact on traffic. The traffic study states that the proposed square footage of pharmacy and medical office space will result in approximately 3,130 average daily trips. Four different scenarios were considered (existing, existing plus project, 2010 without project and 2010 with project). in each case, study intersections were found to continue without any capacity -related impacts, and study roadway segments were calculated to operate at LOS D or better, except for 8th Street east of Plaza Boulevard, which operated at I.OS F. with or without the project. Project improvements were proposed along 8th Street to provide additional storage for inbound left -turning vehicles. The applicant will re -stripe 8tb Street to extend the left -turn lane at V Avenue westerly as a two-way left turn lane. This re - striping would remove left turning vehicles from the through lane of traffic. In addition, painting a red curb along the project area will reduce street parking for 5 properties on the south and 4 properties on the north; however, each of these sites have off-street parking available and there are additional opportunities for on -street parking in the area. These modifications to the existing striping plan along 8th Street further ensure that the project will significantly impact the arterial streets and intersections in the project area. The main entrances to the proposed project site are from public rights -of -way, 7`h and 8'h Streets. The entrances are to be designed in accordance with City standards acceptable to the City Engineering; therefore, there is no impact or dangerous design features created. The proposal is a office project, which typically requires larger amounts of parking. The project proposes to provide a total of 217 parking spaces. including 13 handicap stalls, which exceeds the City requirement of 200 spaces per the Land Use Code. As such, the development would not result in inadequate parking capacity and there is no significant impact to adjacent properties. The proposed project is an office/retail building which has been designed so that all vehicular access is from the two access points, one at the front and one at the rear of the proposed building. A main entrance feature is proposed along E. 40 of 54 Initial Study - Page 15 of 17 's Street for the building and for the pharmacy area, including a pedestrian ramp. Pedestrians will be able to access the center without interference from vehicles accessing the property. The proposed project would not conflict with any adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation in this area; therefore, there is no impact. Also, the project includes the improvement of deteriorated portions of sidewalks adjacent to the project site, as well as the landscape improvement along E. 8th Street. The proposed project does not contain any components that would result in a change in air traffic patterns; therefore, there is no impact. XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1. 2, 4, 10. 13) c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13) d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13) e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing cormnitments? (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13) f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? (Sources: 1, 2, 4) g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation The proposed project would be designed and constructed to best management practices (BMPs) to appropriately handle wastewater and not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board: therefore, there is no impact. The proposed project is located within an urbanized area with existing water facilities, and on a site which has adequate resources for a domestic service. Also, all necessary improvements have been included into the project and construction will be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDE.S) regulations; therefore, there would not be a significant adverse impact. On -site drainage facilities that are adequate to handle the effects oldie proposed construction as required by City ordinances will be employed. The proposed project site would be served by EDCO, the local waste collection and recycle company. EDCO has a contract with the City to handle City solid waste disposal needs. According to EDCO staff, the company utilizes several landfill sites for the disposal of waste collected in National City, with the most common being Otay Mesa, Sycamore, and Miramar Landfills. Each of these sites has ample capacity available; therefore, there is a Tess than significant impact. In 41 of 54 Initial Study - Page 16 of 17 addition, the proposed project would comply with all federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS of SIGNIFICANCE a) noes the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation i1 Li X No significant impacts to the environment as a result of this project have been identified.. Approval of the project is not expected to have any significant impacts, either long-term or short-term, nor will it cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 42 of 54 Initial Study - Page 17 of 17 REFERENCE SOURCES: Reference # Document Title Available for Review at: National City Planning Dept. 1 National City General Plan 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 2 City of National City Municipal Code 3 City of National City Design Guidelines 4 National City Paradise Medical Building Project Plans U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wetlands Online Mapper 5online (http://wetlands fws. er. usgs. gov) 6 California Geologic Survey (http://www.consrv.ca.gov) " 7 Department of Toxic Substances Control (http://www.dLsc.ca.gov) 8 Medical Office Building Traffic Impact Analysis, May 2007 National City Planning Dept. 9 2004 Triennial Revision of the Regional Air Quality Strategy for San Diego County, July 2004 10 California Water Plan Update 2005 online Ontp://www.waterplan.water.ca.gov) 1 1 SanGIS Interactive Mapping (www.sangis.org) " 12 Co. of San Diego Department of Environmental I lealth website online (www.sdcounty.ca.gov/deh/) 13 Comments from National City Fire, Police, Public Works, & National City Planning Dept. Engineering Departments and Sweetwater Authority 43 of 54 NATIONAL CITY PARADISE MEDICAL BUILDING APN 557-140-25-00 AREA ANALYS'.S VICINITY NAP ELECTRICAL N07ES ORIGINAL DETAILEC SCOPE OF WO CT 111£A MCAT CRJ SITRET:Ei TO C PARFJY, F R4aC R_PAre040 AREA RI TOP Mk0W C" ARE. 4' V SOFT }Let 30i1 MIVI'I PA 10 "IS $CFT, MI WA2 }Cf" 1030 93C040 f.CCA K]L'A1 C0ICPS,'ACES 21•4TI W R YIUD 'LQ0 KO.. nr Cis 0w,:E3 24lse90fl 1,941309P4(:l R4tw .0.e739CF1 WI old 9p" ICNY . A•041 •30 i1AITNAT3A/Ijo lC not PYt".NIP, vA Aso*O3 N `•0 Aly 500Rf IYOTAOEIAAL•'3 3 J 3PA:f5 IN P•R20+: SPA AA$' 30209]f1 FIAT. V. SKYPIT9 3PAM11j RPRC£9 9cw WC" 00 110 30 ON PATIO fl%RFQU.Rl3220 MR4NJ 0M.`ES 5001.11:OpJ Sqe• TO 10200 RATS, 1420 PEQU4E06t PAn4N0 E2'C.f9 WO"! 3CIg0 SO r TO M 473 SO.!T MYC '.230 R£0A0E0!I WPM k 3 TOTAL P1o.N9 SM:ES tit 3NEC: i0: PAR03433,0CE SIMNPSPARC SR •1"4t'IClopAPK•4O fS 4TeA20( NG SPACES ST Y1131LCf'I. U MOO I•SS T • Y. •1 PANW0 SPACES 1R UNTO 1C'4. PAW .O 9PACS; PR3'.C£O 21100*00l SPa:£9 FIRE NOTES 2An3 w P4t, NC IAIg9C4al AIPLY3! 4ND11AK M!A i(q 1 A311f10, 9RC.L 6t PT .A\ M CS,.f40E0• £O 1X 16fl.l140= Ir£ PURMIM VW, MarardaMelki: •mom• r�rs�iTr i'aia.PAi^"�.Tva� OM al L05are•r A.1V1.1VIMp -- 3 ffi'ank-Z C'aYLlEI VE elePJ1 g 1344E.R.YiO • rae'srae a • •' • hieViyY ti VAT •e14 M �.�. u•afw ea•L..in'• m • r . Ran P.. e..v.:,. Tr.�.P.• MECHANICAL NOTES GSCWYEJ 1.FTVl0lt SCK:NIO Af4 L /A'.• i.1laE •IJ20M(v 'UAr.D S1PLEI 0.03..T; NATIONAL CITY PARADISE (MEDICAL BUILDING ell NIT -to -SA -0: lrmx. r4AY.1z--NF 'au I•11— .®Y422 if =iwV•61•wr II CM •i••6061 tP wul MOP 12 y F r rA wAi•r. AVM /AY Vu aT Y Y YPin Tue Y PwIgOI9PrrtiaPaV�V��If uL iL ri .Pi Plld i' V • momo• au. May vim vn£mov a'PA •.. Y i••rA Vw• . w =•I rI• 'Y�Lm _a Mtai 3— o •fiKn'Y aa'T. t r NIn •a V'" • Mr MPa 26112, Vu 216. 3 1••...62+ Si6.A.•....T.P. flij=e •R Mu 12 www6 OVM 61 ye a••mo, R6uV *MIN ri...Titigig= GC wz a 1,▪ ..gx4 \ CK.PF 4 of 6 Pvw la.. t..Fi�ADrV.VO =V VR. •s . Y. Ran M TM a•Lt LOBO pm TT( /I 0032 ENWIEf3N: .22 SHEET INDEX 221 22 +u wn a eww.>RV 221262,22222w '.22.12.222I22.2'121 Mtfl • UV 12.1,,•22$ 1.ER 01,1911w IRA RlWI1de-CP PROJECT TEA ABBREVIATIONS 41.42 iiO �Ya� aaY .Ma▪ r Y MI III= r,a 61.2, 2260. CM.4•.we wee..uw 66 memo raw aye, ADDRIONAL INFORMATION t OPM •Oeif 62226 1222. 6162 mn. taott ▪ 'fa ROM,. PROJECT COMPLIANCE T'. V:VPei1 21Oi•IaiC•a•a•ae1•erw .3Eflt I moose ei estwon num.." Io•4 Rwm 6112V61O 21142 ..T. — yea n.f- NV 2Ie14126• 124602 nO MI\ *AMwDi w � e. - La IT ma row TITLE SHEET 41-02-471 T- EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AREA ORJ RR. TERRACE 3RD RR. TERRACE I it NAII. LEE. PROPOSED MEDICAL BUILDING EXISTING CHURCH SITE PLAN SCALE: 1'.2O• C' SITE PLAN GENERAL OTES re Y'Iaor1'O. M}W.• TE%TJRE -ELEND NATIONAL CflY PARADISE MEDICAL BUILDING mR-LYO-x-OO -. C RYEMAY & PAVED AREAS .. ... :'.I LNtiSCAPE &REAR GSA EfAIY! `RNQ k.0 ae•.n+•e u iwf R* -&AMR aFIM l STORM WATER C W LITY 47-ES COYSTRJCT10N 1W 'S COMM. 0. 0 4 10 1 l OPe•%N V1POd d16�8}ryp1aK pRN,10EMN1Ea O(ALI .111,,10 w.'w.mu ��[JWA�i••livNi.M.rl6.eoYiJ4Tt:.`G46u.ontr aatto-im..maul .M 1,14.CUAI•f Unr T' Yn.,,M Ra.Cu0 !, ,00:Y.fMYC.4T ma 1 M.4aM PW Merge Y 1.414JC tl.Tl.• Y• wod <-.rvM cacm.cnc•WIRR 4aPH00• 040n'O`.av:uf4 wa.'CllOcA SY'NQ 0'.•C:KYa' f..K0 a•.0110 Rwl•V:.R A•Mtf n...- OhiTGO,a}OC.uf.wCTrT •••0}..MC'C,IYA. et I CLS,YI[ Id 0t4.OrO•Ma. Tn. OA. et Wee erar AT1. ue.l leLeurg ear • Y'Mw C':IUMY, Mel • Mgt }in gel .e•..JO WSnK'Or Ogg, noalleg CI Ceeo..:rr sal Arne euian wu e] Teel w genre. TO IR UV, .ere011:.W I0A.440 i114••• •nee MVIOCMI,M Yoe gig 10Y IRT'pOnOntYld NO MO MIN COW Ky. MCM lee Ka' ▪ wNalt: YA, Wi Y•O•M •,..yaR. O1 M! R.1 ad eMw11 .wr ewe. 000.t4 4...ue:I.no-1Ye M M.e C-W'RIC1.:4 p en:PLPMe NlnQli•17'••w1 IN ': if ,di: re1,0 nt}'L e.. a•w0•I YeelN,'A•'.a Cant) lee..►wnt.Vl00NOK1> 00A ▪ ye eaf W..YC!V.14:11oalu.YDI• CM•.O:T., Keen, WV Se .ut:eCT.Sv'..Y-ZTV}:N.N YOwtN T4efIY'.: u men �n',Aug :r e.. COtl..K.fl •xl43 f.•otare!.. x.e. ea rn0AOV0•.N' Icnr...,..L.ee.� IILIN.Y.f rc Me Ofr...1r. 0•..an0RnAc n r1.1.40 fw_a l.W\ RM...Pe e- tee n.•r .ne•ea. RASA L'1 M_.r.• .r.w...•.rrr.. ••I..11•04.6/1e+..• a..e...•n..�.. gme SEE PLAN • 07-0a-0 1 AM'-0 M •_M SP1 • / • 4 (3 I 1C-4, )ft' In _20.]ft' A' :ft' _ 14'-S• t JS S'.4' -t /+C k L., 4. 22 StnAllAtO Ireu.nr vrr r 4+MMMCN • t N Off( 'fun."] I• Af+1+f! il +u f',.m. II r+; NATIONAL CITY PARADISE MEDICAL BUILDING CAS EkONEERK3..nc iaee:�aw..�•AAR 'al .1116 Y• M]Vo x nLW 0 Imo Mr- l•-er! son scograt UNDER GROUND BASEMENT A-1 3 C IA ID • F ? .---, /----`, . / I !PS' 1 S.A.P1CeAlte COPP30,4- 1111312.> • 7,4M ,6 STANOAKI, ,solvpr I e• 12 COMPACT PAS., M.A.C, Rft • • ?AMMO !PA POCVIDID ON MS 1141: Let L PI • 'NATIONAL CITY PARADISE MEDICAL BUILDING PPP 1S7.14,25.0.1 GSA ENGP.EEPING.Irt •?I Pon, SN. MAPP 77 ow p Wpm Papopu. 04-14.1 SPSSID MAW 01-01-0P Alm MMOI• STREET LEVEL FIRST FLOOR V-ce-ar - 2 tnae (4I— +— i I 3 )-- I°.C"Inlnnlu 7—\ 2, 211' C, E 15' 19' 19' 2a5'-9/ 19' 2A' j NATIONAL CITY PARADISE MEDICAL BUILDING APN CASA 046IAEEFlh6. :tlb.14I.ry:A v 4- ..1 . 1. rar, —14-01 MAO WWI. r SECOND FLOOR A-3 I 4 k 3 7a ;„ 2 I A) ,Bl C ; • D SI' ,4A et af. • OPEN , E 24V3.t F OD G sio Dq 3.254 5.!. 11,1,4 F. •.) I - he X H , ; , ' r4 t.O. • 1,, n • NATIONAL CITY PARADISE I MEDICAL BUILDING Wr, CASA ENONEE1110.10. Stif 0.0.• cosw 0.W.cccs MN •rn. 0111.13• 114.1 11•1,M, THIRD FLOOR Mir - A - 4 •zr Lt 4. C 5 1— , 3 A ; , B ) ( C ) , E , I-, ! IN ...- i! 0(—\ V DJ I —OF EN 4 0— --E jJ NATIONAL CITY PARADISE MEDICAL BUILDING A, 65,..40.25-o.: C ASA ENGINEERING, !rc ant Ir. SA.. DIVA :1A &MA .1.14 (1.14 01..9 ,115! KOWA 7~41 /1411-41• ROOF Mat -or inr-f-ce tr: -A- 5 RAM? . TAT 10 OF %Of ((ION D2 1 f'1OVC RAMVTCA 00 r 0RAM11 00 + M 1' fY. n reM M( rb' 1K' IV MGM ARC (I0¢1 011Vp 7 KRI7ti Mn INDGRAaa 110C 0211101• 100f OR 0 .4a12w. 1a1 rw 1.0101 AR ACCOA0 ICµ MA m YIM 1 I.ua ,t *04C Al .Dam 01 DA. 0 TREE ANT:NG - DEC:DUOLS T',^ �_,.^"�_ .':T-_. 1.Y5W 0 1-1RUE 'LASTING CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE ^".2O'-0' uENERA_ NCT_S L ALL ♦10* full R •0101C0 1T 011130wt "MILlµ ✓< - I.IA 401C Or V}. ARO 001 1.0 +VRV1101 Of • 00,10 now. G R411 1.1104 C11 PLAN MC C:00•01,C 00 4• • A1LCI ^_ 11A51501 a. la ru1.0 r 010100 C 211112 ' . 1 RAM 'ICES M1p ,an 10..T MC fA[( '.'. 0:K rK R+? M(YYK( a1 0C.ATI%9I '0 AC.MQ.I (Ta1(F0Cs. ♦ K:K ILL .L 070 f0 K • (µE• AMC, 00 4010 WO? :AL 4.( :ARA, 0110RIC 03100sr. VS CC•M ORJV( (-VAT TOIL. 1 FLAW TOES Ma STIQ AS R.1r ? CC'00. • W'( an S5 atC a(UT., AM ACC MA M. 11031. (01 LORA. srlas. 4u OM. XLC1211001....(w1 1 Kla RART;K. CORM KL MGs .ISM TRAM LL ROCS Cr MC 10 0.3.1 ( OAMIACC r4 RM MRIUL 10 A .01IJ0 Jr O( M AO KIM AcCC•rnC( 1T 0AIr:4 rsA.NtING NOTES L A sa a 4. a .•IR} YAWN R OR ••aa .Y. (.(. rl..LL RC WI 04 I.IM IR ifl & mow" rc r anMat ammo r el: 04? i S( nh. aR SW N N(N•'. nor 11AMMO RL • - (R1101a O 101a•11( IR R901 a'l Ea• AMA MAI . MM. AMW( 04440 • a a• •o1s 0011na at MAE is ruf s? (ea S ar Or a r•a n•nn Fs•1n 1.• 11a l l rlS a anus 1./ s ILLT A - 1 •TA 11 Im1-01 N N(111YI1N YL YarN OaK1.0 a I. IIK wro-at • u• auus 1a( nm r it CAMAS a11. R• 1OR AMMO a Wm1LRa. RRW. 1' r 01Y• lala ILL IYaY ]( Y•• 1l 1• a .• as L rat • 411W1 MAW IRLL R 00011•r 10 ARS MA111•AR12 •• I11 n 11101 ua n.r1 01 OOSR 1• as a YAM/(£ ? W 11M at 6,0 a14 aa• 045. 11 IWaa0rr 012 1Sri( ar. 1a fl •=IaCRaa RR11011 R•tl11rr 1RRi a• AM • - s m(,ta r11 ana11 r m u1rr1(( .olll AL AM.A. ILL r•2100 r VA RA 5-=fA Rv WWt1YRi w Ns (Rls a OR 1.1 a nuLa. 01 MA Al MI 01•11aResa1 11.21101.1 Wauia Ru•hta • 10. aol0 M 1Wa AI 1. IMAM R6 11. At lar s• 1a IMAM s11 IYOA la •• 11a? sR MA UM /A1 0111 a s a MAIM ••1M MN Rut• 041 r•11•0 Ye rOR(AMA •ulIII 1M(15 011.01I N• 41400 aAM A rrr6 Y Nlar aY MA• Ia 211011.1•102i Is r• a➢ me Y YL RAMO M11 MAN 45 U. RA OWL. a ALMA a•aR up r. 1 aI m 505. MOM AL 01011 •s1 •M NOM 10 aY ae r1R a 1r 00 IL 00 1•• RaRYa AIM AMA al(r - R I• a•( a•Maa5TA a t11•(A Olh? A aTr 1121012. um( 11021. 1101•• •K AMA s(L>m m n+wm w1101 1112.00. • ay a1R • 0 MAW .R0110 AD LANCSCARE .ECENJ ai Kau LIPSON II,M.1' I rn"5n otaM- .IaWa •.L1 11 4=.70. I'. f 0 .01 "'AV' 44:;;.• D w1n INATiONAL CITY' PARADISE NSDICAL BUILDiNC •rn 001-140-E+-00 rr CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE KAN 07y1-Irr 1.t1-0. L-1 H w w co W u.• ]0 1Na• TOP CV ROOT MII IS MD TON M MOAP Slate OOF.. e,N.rac Yrt 0004 4S 02 RR 0 I RRLL Oa l J 'REE FLAN'!VG - DECIDUOUS ti 'CAN SAUCER VIT.r C].rIM0U1 ALGA. RIN SMFCIr:E: RL4'1Rd :A Y.T0 L 1M. TO MN"h Air 000OETS TS WL Cu CSM4l:B PLAN-ING CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN ICENERAL 'VOTES L hL VOIS LYLL IC RWIISIC0 I• KI;q'MAIM YIIN 'IIIS (]R R *0(1 MS a.OM l.( i.IMv:10 . Cf L Ms,. .q.µ ! e rf-CCAIMIS 04 R.4 MC OYY.a.a'IC ar0 .a! . 2..0' 00 .OJ .0, Di 'K r._ Tr-mOSCMC CD.R1C,at L RA, TOM ✓.0 10. L1*04! 40 PRAC TO MK r.R c1r MCCµyal CO I0a'10.0.a To 4las .. STRCTUCL a NCOYI ...OM TO TO . LNIT S0100. $CUJOC Ll.r SM. 0.4 M2•!r 3W0RC C3RCS T. USE CC. f/WC i-YT''WSCIL S .LMT IIFES M0 SW AS SMY4 tel XTR:- L AMC S00. 1.00 C S0OI. M0 RFC 031 III. ROM SOIL ...SVS. 1110,1. M4 01. .C,1200 M.p1LL r Arra KMr11Cf GKa all raw VIM Tres( or 00C1 Cr red Mar .L4CSL ! OaRM•CC RL. RN.' N*.0IIL PM a RI.I00 Cf O( r(M AMR LCCOI.RCC I• 0.012 PJAN}DTC VIS ! l alM aaM. AI W MID. AM . R MSM M. 51 P. .oar NM ML as wni 10 mwL • 10 01:.0114 R pi RR 00201 W MOM lrO I.a ..041 a1.10l 000U. • . WM. m llm AS *5 .ut MOM u Iwu 01a5 Ta 1. @r of Y WON umn OKiYa a RL 1.10.1a .at. Maul I.. re a *441? i I MI.. lapY b lill.il Sl Ry5 WI.. 200002 .00002 ARM N.0 Yr.Y-0t. a YO.W. i MI a wYw 0. IR Y .20 ®.0. 4 l R Wis. OR Mc. CAUL O111.• A 011Y1 S' M 0.00 IAMB a ill ILYYS .a01W 4 r - r Sala a ill wrr rlMa all ul.l. it s No.. 0a IT WOO.1.YM\ 00 R AR IYOa YL Roa 0454 ..a. To aM a IlMula IYIIR a RI.a 0100 . 0 OM. Man Mom no. e0SOW a1. 010.0 0. V Man ♦ RSV 140.00. r ROM. 10 Y RMR a am N. ISa IIS. 1M O001 IDA MOM R'> 1*041 aeon DM 0 MOW R i S.MT.R IL 01.1. MLL .ILL . No. 01. a0600 = Ma .l IILOOMILL. d_ IYa A SWARM. 1. .I. lv Ma R a CR. LT a ea•Sr a.. au wr ra TO L.D.mom. Y. 00 .lL* 5 YL RYI MIS :: YI NO M.L. 5802 al u 000 R.r SWT Mal YL Ram u R. la or Am. Lao A. Too .a Y 0E D. a. L. al0 a.L1.(ILWui-VL• an. -IVL m...a-L'MMt :. Ma . Tool. moo. a.w .ul . Rau fl ...0 MOW Lu.a 51• RLY1158 anal rl. wRa 13. lm 0 102Puns. W.RIL/M OM.N 0 CO Op2Ma O 0M. 14 OM 0 L. A ... Lat 140111111. 4 SIMIA IYa MY. LIl 0•.IMIi1 IY}MLL N Ma. L. Ewe L. Y DO wI.0 goo . s ..a10. a 0•0 0u4. 1.110201. MIL M...O 07005.r •OLD0 UR.OuaRIII.01 aW! 4R.: MA 0IR-L al0. SRRO :. Ara. II..M 02*55 l al.. mR/5*•• 1 i0. OM a MRo1 MR.a I ac•4r�IL LANCSCAPE LECENC 0 •• 02' 1. >is.• a.MaO.QY 240 (� losses., II••y.a11 Awn r NATIONAL CITY' PARADISE VENAL DUI DING L01 5I7-140-30-00 PIER AIM ae.e .Allyn Y41 W1117.102 We 202 4.3 ih. n. I IN• 0.a.aa a....l ooms O.O Y4uN �C I raa I c*It.r" A a' YMnnnr AYI. r TM1 Ir1) cpr.J. c •. LCI. m :c S€C 1 u1)J / PORTKN J7 EISI M4 r Cr •c l0r 1./' 6LL. 5E1 ' 1C A0•a AfA • YR u 100. ACCJIMEY. INC. RR au* M for 10. Y RI. C. Yw me ter.... R(MO Yw yR b Mr i0iJR7 Rj q 110♦i' T p. .1w_ J.• l'• VW' IR S'M ! ! ( ! 7TH STREET t 6' SOCR6ut n >N.r,._ cnA•n 1 e•• Or C.-On ON 1.016 ITYIErr4C ra O6.S100 AT -AS pEsi6011UMh SECTION A • A EcRr.CA 6 MAl• .000AC C 130 ISC.I1S1 1 rlN 06V19a1 a,-9. (E/.S1 BOURUARh TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 8TH AND "V" AVE. NA'IONA_ CITY, CA. APN 557-140-25 NOTES! 1.- COVrOIR Y•EAV+. a 0.5c 7EEr. BENCHMARK 6104d YAK 0. Cr( OF YCO w'L6fECC 011 LOOM r S 8011R3ax' a oA.Y A+E, ew am sr. IYP]•.4 crr. nna67. AREAS OIMI ...EA. .I.9•7 S) ml a Ac •n A.a- au:sl m3T AC - , — dnnr0 10100 ,Da - A—x-' VJIING 0•An .3VA 14M2 16' so _ P1.A510. ARO 1I010M1 ARM — a.— Y WWI.Y *41_ —Yr— r M1OIEr r9.CE _-1.. -- 6' Rem MC( d OOS,AC TREE CAMINOr CROWD C0,71 .11 • cx Ca1YTRA O R10 REAM laAtAICIS MY,S.G C10410G 11AMI37E 11ijTY .0E SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT SECTION C • C 66fQ61 SECTION D • D :.eS YAP OOIRCn1 SO.ESDOS A 9.01K" YNC eY IC 011 I.IIXM YY 06TECRW Y OMO.YNCCC KIN I 11EO.A1dorTS Cf ME 1A00 SVAVCa'JRS ACT Ai NC RE01Ea" V 6MRY ...AS. M r r. PAL.ECA L5. 5717 A.Y AEaSTRAttY d6ME6 6/30/2007 Is 3-A ARAA C T1 (X na-10NAl QTY RNC Nf ERINC; C':-NON 1r n•..1.....> GP•2220 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AEETING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 10 (ITEM TITLE PUBLIC HEARING — FISCAL YEAR 2008-2009 FUNDING CYCLE FOR THE CDBG AND HOME PROGRAMS The purpose of Public Hearing #1 is to review community needs, discuss eligible activities for both the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) Programs, and solicit public comments and input regarding the use of these funds. PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Rosemary Toscano 1' (Ext. 4391) DEPARTMENT Grants and Housing Department Each year the City completes an extensive public participation process to review and approve various programs and projects eligible for CDBG and HOME program funds. Public Hearing #1 is the first of four public hearings to solicit meaningful community involvement and input in the development of the City's Fiscal Year (FY) 2008-2009 Annual Action Plan. The City Council and Housing and Community Development Committee (HCDC) will consider the strategic goals and objectives identified in the City's 5-Year Consolidated Plan (2005-10) approved in May 2005 and the strategic objectives identified in the recently developed and approved Community Development Commission Five -Year Strategic Plan. In addition, the Council and the HCDC will review and consider input collected via the City's Neighborhood Council Program. Each of these planning tools will be utilized for establishing the City's funding priorities for FY 2008-2009. Environmental Review Ni N/A Financial Statement Estimated amount of the HUD entitlements for FY 2008-2009: Community Development Block Grant - $1,135,000 Home Investment Partnership Program - $593,000 Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Conduct a public hearing to solicit public input regarding the housing and community development needs. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Attachment 1: FY 2008-2009 CDBG/HOME Timeline Attachment 2: Public Notices Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary A-200 (9/99) ATTACHMENT 1: FY 2008-2009 CDBG/HOME TIMELINE FY 2008-2009 CDBG:AND.HOME PROGRAM GRANT -FUNDING TIMELINE January 2, 2008 (Wednesday): FY 2008-09 CDBG/HOME Grant Funding Applications Available for Distribution City Hall Clerks Office or Finance Department Counter January 8, 2008 (Tuesday): City Council Public Hearing #1- Community Needs Public Hearing 6pm City Hall Council Chamber January 9, 2008 (Wednesday): CDBG/HOME Technical Assistance Mini -Workshop for Grant Applicants 10:O0am Martin Luther King Building 140 East 12th Street, South Room February 4, 2008 (Monday): March 3, 2008 (Thursday): March 18, 2008 (Tuesday): Application Submission Deadline Due by 2:00prrt at the City Clerks Office or at the Finance Department Counter Distribution of CDBG/HOME Grant Application Booklets to the City Council and HCDC City Council and HCDC Public Hearing #2 - CDBG/HOME Program Applicant Presentations 6pm City Hall Council Chamber March 24, 2008 (Monday): March 27, 2008 (Thursday): April 1 , 2008 (Tuesday): April 3, 2008 to May 5, 2008 May 6, 2008 (Tuesday): HCDC Applicant Funding Recommendations Meeting for Council Consideration 5pm City Hall Small Conference Room HCDC Funding Recommendations for City Council Review/Consideration (Provided via Memorandum) City Council Public Hearing #3 - Applicant Grant Funding Recommendations (Decision Making Meeting) 6pm City Hall Council Chamber 30-Day Public Review & Comment Period For the Proposed FY 2008-2009 Annual Action Plan May 13, 2008 (Tuesday): City Council Final Public Hearing #4 — To Approval the FY 2008-2009 Annual Action Plan 6pm City Hall Council Chamber Submission of the FY 2008-2009 Annual Action Plan to HUD 1 Cir PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ATTACHMENT 2: AVAILABILITY OF GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM FUNDING FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008-2009 AND GRANT APPLICATION ORIENTATION MEETING/MINI-WORKSHOP FOR NON-PROFIT AGENCIES AND GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES The City of National City will be accepting grant applications for its FY 2008-2009 CDBG and HOME program funds. Interested non-profit agencies and governmental entities are invited to attend a grant orientation meeting/mini-workshop scheduled for: Date: Wednesday, January 9, 2008 Time: 10:00am - 12:00 pm Location: Martin Luther King Building 140 East 12th Street, South Room National City, CA 91950 Application materials and application guidelines will be available along with important related program information that will assist applicants in developing their grant requests. To register for the FREE grant orientation meeting/mini-workshop, please contact the Grants and Housing Department at phone number (619) 336-4391, or by fax at (619) 336-4349. Hearing impaired persons, please use the CA Relay Service Number (711). Examples of eligible activities to benefit National City residents include: Y Housing programs, public facilities, and public services programs that benefit low- and moderate -income persons; > Slum and blight elimination activities in the City's Redevelopment Area. Beginning on January 2, 2008, application materials will also be available for pick-up in advance of the orientation meeting at the two city offices noted below: City of National City - City Hall Finance Department - Payment Office 1243 National City Boulevard (accessible at the rear of the building) Hours: Monday -Thursday 7am-6pm City of National City - City Hall City Clerk's Office 1243 National City Boulevard Hours: Monday -Thursday 7am-6pm GRANT APPLICATIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2008, BY 6:00 P.M. MST. For more information regarding this process, please call the Grant and Housing Department at (619) 336-4391. Hearing impaired persons please use the CA Relay Service Number 711. 2 ATTACHMENT 2: PUBLIC NOTICE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2008-2009 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIPS (HOME) PROGRAM FUNDING Notice is hereby given that the City of National City Council and the Housing and Community Development Committee (HCDC) will hold four (4) Public Hearings: • PUBLIC HEARING #1 — Tuesday, January 8, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. The purpose is to review community needs, discuss eligible activities for both the CDBG and HOME Programs, and solicit public comments and input regarding the use of these funds. > pUBLIC HEARING #2 — Tuesday, March 18, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. The purpose is to hear presentations from agencies that have submitted applications for CDBG and/or HOME Program funding. ➢ PUBLIC HEARING #3 — Tuesday, April 1, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. The purpose is for the Council and HCDC to discuss their funding recommendations and for the Council to formulate their funding recommendations for the FY 2008-2009 CDBG and HOME Program Funds. ➢ PUBLIC HEARING #4 — Tuesday, May 6, 2008 at 6:00 p.m. The purpose is to review public comments received during the 30-Day Annual Action Plan public review period; and to provide interested persons and community groups with one last opportunity to share their thoughts regarding the proposed FY 2008-2009 CDBG & HOME Program funding recommendations (Annual Action Plan). The estimated amount of funding available for FY 2008-2009 for each program is as follows: ➢ Community Development Block Grant - $1,135,000 ➢ Home Investment Partnership Program - $593,000 Interested persons and community groups are invited to attend these hearings. All public hearings will be held at the City ofNational City, City Hall Council Chamber, located at 1243 National City Boulevard, National City CA 91950. For more information regarding this process, please call the Grant and Housing Department at (619) 336-4391. Hearing impaired persons please use the CAL Relay Service Number 711. City facilities are wheelchair accessible. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (619) 336-4228 to request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24-hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Asistencia En Espanol: para que le interpreten la solicitud en espanol, Ilame al (619) 336-4563. Chris Zapata, City Manager City of National City Publish: The Union Tribune Dates: December 22,2007 3 City facilities are wheelchair accessible. Please contact the. City Clerk's Office at (619) 336-4228 to request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24-hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Asistencia En Espanol: para que to interpreten la solicitud en espanol, Ilame al (619) 336-4563. Chris Zapata, City Manager City of National City of National City Publish: The Union Tribune Dates: December 22, 2007 L} ATTACHMENT 3: 5-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN SUMMARY OVERVIEW OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) AND HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT (HOME) PROGRAMS The City of National City receives Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Home Investment Partnership Act (HOME) program funds, as a direct entitlement from the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The CDBG and HOME programs are primarily designed to assist low- to moderate -income households by providing affordable housing, revitalizing neighborhoods, and by creating employment opportunities through economic development. In order for National City to qualify for its CDBG and HOME entitlement funding, it must comply with an array of statutory and regulatory requirements, such as the development of the: Five -Year Consolidated Plan (Con -Plan), Analysis of Impediments (AI) to Fair Housing Choice, Annual Action Plan (AAP), and Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). Provided below is a summary of the information provided in each report. FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN (CON -PLAN) The Con -Plan prepared in the spring of 2005 was developed in accordance with Sections 91.100 through 91.230 of HUD's Consolidated Plan regulations; and it was designed consistent with the City's General Plan, particularly the Housing Element. In addition, the Con -Plan was developed with an extensive consultation process that involved community stakeholders, housing and service providers, community leaders, city departments, and National City residents. National City's Con -Plan for fiscal years 2005/06 through FY 2009/10, identifies city -specific housing and community development needs. TABLE A - FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN SUMMARY, on pages iii to vi, provides a summary of the Con -Plan goals and objectives. In addition, TABLE B - FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN SUMMARY FOR CDBG & HOME FUNDS provided on page vii, identifies the specific goals and objectives to be pursued with CDBG and HOME program funds. ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS (AI) TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICE In addition to the development of a Con -Plan, HUD requires that jurisdictions receiving CDBG and HOME program funding take actions to affirmatively further fair housing choices. Jurisdictions must report on such activities by completing an AI every three to five years, in alignment with the Con -Plan schedule. In general, the AI is a review of the impediments to fair housing choice in both the public and private sectors. The City of National City participated in the San Diego Regional Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, prepared by Cotton/Bridges/Associates in February of 2005. Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (AAP) The purpose of the AAP is to review and update those assessments presented in the Con -Plan; to inventory resources that will be available during a given program year (fiscal year); and to identify the specific actions that will be taken in that program year to meet the city's housing and community development needs, and to implement the strategies set forth in the Con -Plan. National City's AAP's are submitted to HUD annually, prior to May 15tn CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) At the close of each program year (fiscal year), the city is required to submit a CAPER to HUD by September 30th. This report illustrates the actual accomplishments achieved during the program year. The CAPER allows HUD, local officials, and citizens to assess the use of available resources and to assess the efforts made towards achieving the goals and objectives identified in the Con -Plan, AI, and the AAP. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS An integral component in the development of the Con -Plan, AI, AAP, and the CAPER reports is public participation. Included in the Con -Plan, is the City's Public Participation Plan, which outlines the measures taken to facilitate public participation. The Public Participation Plan provides residents and community stakeholders with numerous opportunities to participate at various phases in the development of these planning documents. Public hearings and public meetings are conducted with the City's Housing and Community Development Commission (HCDC) and/or before the City Council to gather input from residents, community stakeholders, and city departments. The HCDC is a citizen committee appointed by the City Council to oversee the annual grant application process, and to facilitate valuable public participation in the CDBG and HOME funding process. The HCDC conducts public hearings and meetings, reviews funding requests, and makes funding recommendations to the City Council. The dedicated efforts of the HCDC ensure that community needs are identified, carefully considered, and are properly addressed. Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary I I TABLE A - FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN SUMMARY FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN STRATEGIC HOUSING (H) PLAN PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES FISCAL YEARS 2005/06 THROUGH 2009/10 Priority H-1: Preservation and_ Maintenance of,Existing .Housing Objective 1: Code Enforcement Five -Year Objectives: Using General funds the Planning and Building and Safety Departments will enforce all codes at the current rate: a. Planning and Zoning - Inspect 13,000 housing units and abate approximately 5,500 cases over the five-year period. b. Building and Safety/Uninhabitable Building - Abate approximately 100 cases and Inspect 500 housing units over the five-year period. c. Housing Inspection - Inspect 2,500 housing units and abate approximately 250 cases over the five-year period. Objective 2: "Christmas in July" Community Volunteer Program Five -Year Objectives: Using HOME funds, the Community Development Commission (CDC) will support the rehabilitation/repair of 75 houses or 15 houses annually. Objective 3: Apartment Management Five -Year Objectives: The City, using General funds will continue to pursue enforcement requiring on -site management in complexes of nine or more units. Priority H-2: Housing Assistance: Objective 1: Conservation of Affordable Units at Risk of Converting to Market Rate Five -Year Objectives: using Section 8 funding, the CDC will conserve the 614 units at -risk of converting to market rate. Annually review the status of Granger Apartments, Inter City Manor and Plaza Manor. Identify nonprofit organizations as potential purchasers/managers of at -risk housing units. Explore funding sources available to preserve the affordability of at -risk projects, or to construct replacement units Assist tenants to apply for priority status on the Section 8 voucher/certificate programs should a conversion take place. Objective 2: Section 8 Rental Assistance Program Five -Year Objectives: Using Section 8 funds, continue to provide 300 units of Section 8 project - based affordable housing at Morgan -Kimball Towers, 372 units at Plaza Manor, 79 at Inter City Manor, 163 at Granger Apartments and 76 at TELACU. Maintain the level of tenant -based Section 8 assistance and pursue additional allocation of Section 8 vouchers (1,044). Objective 3: First -Time Homebuvers Assistance Program Five -Year Objectives:- Provide assistance to 25 households over the next five years, with distribution of funds per the following; approximately 60 percent to low-income households (HOME funds), and 40 percent to moderate -income households (Redevelopment Set Aside funds). Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN STRATEGIC HOUSING PLAN (continued) PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES FISCAL YEARS 2005/06 THROUGH 2009/10 Priority H-3: Housin • Production Objective 1: GIS Database Five -Year Objectives: Using General funds, the Planning Department will maintain and keep the GIS database current in order to provide specific development information and market infill housing to interested developers. Objective 2: Community Housing Development Organizations (CHDOs) Five -Year Objectives: On an annual basis through the Consolidated Plan One Year Action Plan Process, the CDC will identify and provide funding to CHDOs in order to pursue additional affordable housing projects. Provide funding to support CHDOs in building administrative capacity. Objective 3: Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and New Construction of Affordable Housing Five -Year Objectives: The CDC will identify and pursue the rehabilitation and/or construction of 50 affordable housing units over the five year period. Allocate HOME funds annually through the Consolidated Planning process. Allocate Redevelopment Set -Aside funds through the five year Redevelopment Implementation Planning process. Ongoing pursuit of affordable housing projects. Objective 4: Density Bonuses Five -Year Objectives: The developer shall agree to and the City shall ensure continued affordability of all lower income units for a minimum 45-year period. In 2002, the City of National City developed an ordinance in compliance with State law to offer density bonuses for the development of lower income and senior housing. Objective 5: Communicate Production Priorities to Prospective Developers Five -Year Objectives: Specific actions to be taken by the Planning Department over the next five years may include: a. Update"National City Facts," a Planning Department -prepared brochure that provides information for the development community on land use and development trends in the City, available services and resources, and social and economic characteristics of the City. b. Prepare reports as needed to respond to changes in development activity or to inquiries from developers and others concerning potential development sites. c. Maintain the City's computerized land use inventory to provide updated information regarding the location of vacant properties, by parcel size, zoning and existing land use. d. Present to business and civic groups concerning land use and development potential in the City. e. Participate in informational meetings with the Building Industry Association, Urban Land Institute, American Planning Association, and the National City Chamber of Commerce, among others. Obiective 6: Implementation of Housing Element Annual Report Five -Year Objectives: The Planning Department will submit an annual Housing Element Report to the State HCD to ensure local emphasis in meeting the goals of this Housing Element and propose policy changes to correct non -achievement, if necessary Objective 7: Conversion of Commercially and Industrially -Zoned Land to Residential or Mixed -Use Zoning Five -Year Objectives: The Planning Department will convert certain commercially -and industrially - zoned parcels to residential or mixed -use zoning in response to development proposals. Objective 8: Feasibility Study of Use of Eminent Domain in Redevelopment Protect Area Five -Year Objectives: The Community Development Commission will study the feasibility of allowing the use of eminent domain for redevelopment of housing in the Redevelopment Project Area by the end of fiscal year 2005. Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary iv FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN STRATEGIC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CD) PLAN PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES FISCAL YEARS 2005/06 THROUGH 2009/10 Priority CD-1:. Expand Economic Development and Employment Opportunities Obiective 1: Redevelopment Activities Five -Year Objectives: Using Redevelopment Funds, the Community Development Commission (CDC) will continue to implement redevelopment activities to upgrade the business environment in National City. Redevelopment activities are likely to include: street and sidewalk improvements; code enforcement; and commercial/industrial infrastructure development. Obiective 2: Technical Assistance Center Five -Year Objectives: Through Redevelopment Tax Increment funds, the Technical Assistance Center will provide service to 100 businesses over the next five years. Obiective 3: Business Retention Activities Five -Year Objectives: Through the use of Redevelopment funds, the CDC will provide business retention services to 25 businesses over a period of five years. Obiective 4: Micro -Loan Program Five -Year Objectives: Consider the pursuit of packaging 40+ micro -loans to small businesses over the next five years. Obiective 5: Facade Program Five -Year Objectives: The Facade Program will complete over 50 storefronts over the next five years. Obiective 6: Merchant Organizations (Business Associations) Five -Year Objectives: Create three merchant associations over a five-year period. Priority CD-2: Improve and Provide Public and Community Facilities;. and Make Necessary Infrastructure Im • rovements, to Serve; Low and Moderate Income Persons Obiective 1: Capital Improvement Plan Five -Year Objectives: The CDC, Department of Public Works and the Parks and Recreation Department (now a section within the Community Services Department) will complete and implement a yearly Capital Improvement Plan to address infrastructure, ADA improvements and parks and recreational facility needs and funding. Obiective 2: Community Facilities Five -Year Objectives: The CDC, Community Services Department, Building and Safety, and Engineering and Parks and Recreation Department will continue to use the Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan process to identify and prioritize community facility projects for funding. Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary v 9 FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN STRATEGIC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN (continued) PRIORITIES AND OBJECTIVES FISCAL YEARS 2005/06 THROUGH 2009/10 Priority CD-3: Provide: Needed Public and Community Services for tow and Moderate Income Persons and those viiithS .ediat.Needs Objective 1: Compliance with Fair Housing Requirements of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Programs Five -Year Objectives: The CDC will continue to implement actions to address fair housing issues through the CDBG and HOME -funded activities. Objective 2: Continue Cooperation a11d_Support of Fair Housing Counseling and Enforcement Organizations Five -Year Objectives: Through the use of CDBG and Section 8 funds, the CDC and FHCSD will continue to ensure open, fair housing practices and that sufficient resources are made available to assure informed housing consumers and suppliers. Annually evaluate the services provided by the fair housing counseling and enforcement organizations to ensure adequate and appropriate services are provided, and revise contracts as appropriate. Objective 3: Fair Housing Training Five -Year Objectives: In new projects with 10 units or more, the CDC and FHCSD will encourage the training of staff in fair housing administration. Objective 4: Youth Services Five -Year Objectives: The CDC, school districts and non-profit organizations will use the Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan process to evaluate the potential use of CDBG funds to provide and improve services and facilities for youth and families in National City. Objective 5: Senior Services Five -Year Objectives: The CDC will use the Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan process to evaluate the potential use of CDBG funds to provide and improve services and facilities for seniors in National City. Objective 6: Community and Special Needs Services Five -Year Objectives: The Community Development Commission and non-profit organizations will use the Consolidated Plan Annual Action Plan process to evaluate the potential use of CDBG funds to provide and improve community and special needs services. Objective 7: Planning and_Administration Five -Year Objectives: The CDC/City will continue to implement the housing and Community Development programs and comply with all planning and reporting requirements of CDBG and HOME regulations. The CDC/City will review the implementation of the Consolidated Plan programs and objectives and update the Action Plan annually. Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary vi 10 TABLE B - FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN SUMMARY FOR CDBG & HOME FUNDS SUMMARY OF THE FIVE YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN* (FISCAL YEARS 2005/06 THROUGH 2009/10) QUANTIFIED OBJECTIVES FOR THE USE OF CDBG & HOME PROGRAM FUNDS SPECIFIC -HOMELESS AND SPECIAL NEEDS POPULATIONS OBJECTIVES TO BE FUNDED WITH CDBG FUNDS NEEDS CATEGORY { SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES Homeless Provide services to 1,900 people annually through shelter programs, supportive housing grants, and other related services. Elderly / Disabled 1 Assist 1,260 elderly/disabled annually residents through the support of various programs and senior/disabled facilities. SPECIFIC HOUSING. OBJECTIVES TO. BE FUNDED WITH CDBG AND HOME FUNDS NEEDS CATEGORY SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES. Owner Assist 10 first-time homebuyers (households) annually. Households Owner Households Lower -Income Elderly Households Assist 25 owner households with Home Improvement loans annually. Rehabilitate 15 homes (households) annually. Renter Households Rehabilitate 5 rental units annually. SPECIFIC.COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES TO BE. FUNDED WITH CDBG FUNDS NEEDS CATEGORY SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES Youth Assist in providing after school activities to 8,000 youth annually. Youth Assist in the provision of recreational activities for a roximately 750 youth annually. Child Care Services Assist in providing child care assistance to approximately 120 persons annually. Fair Housing Services Assist in providing fair housing services to 95 persons annually. * As illustrated in the city's 5-year Con -Plan for program years 2005/06-2009/10, pages, 84-85. Attachment 3: 5-Year Consolidated Plan Summary v i i City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT IEETING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 ITEM TITLE Public Hearing for the removal of the public telephone located at 115 E. 8th Street that is \ encroaching into the City Reserved Right -of -Way. PREPARED BY Charles Nissley DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4396 EXPLANATION See attached Explanation. i Environmental Review X NIA MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION%�, /J N/A j/� i BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMEDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) 1. Explanation l. hearing A-200 (Rev. 7/03) Resolution No. EXPLANATION to property owner of 115 through 119 E. 8111 Street and the business owners operating at these locations recently contacted the City of National City Engineering Department with concerns about two public telephones located adjacent to 115 and 117 E. 8T1 Street. The complaint was originally directed to the Police Department requesting the phones be removed. The Police Department referred the matter to the Engineering Department to see if the phones were installed legally. A site investigation by Engineering Department staff revealed that the phones were installed within the City reserved Right -of -Way. A record search failed to produce any encroachment agreement for either telephone. City staff called the listed owners Western Tel and Haro/Stewart LLC. Staff talked several times with the respective owners and informed them that the phones were in violation of city ordinances. A removal order notice for the payphones was drafted and approved by the office of the City Attorney. The notices were posted on November 1511i, 2007 providing the owner with 30 days to remove the phone. On December 15111, 2007 staff had not heard back from the owners and the phones remained in place in violation of the removal orders. Staff was advised by the City Attorney's Office (who had reconciled code with case law) to conduct this through the Abatement procedure, It was further stipulated that since the owners were given prior notice with sufficient time for removal a shorter time period of 10 days would he sufficient. Staff posted the notices on the phones on December 201H, 2007 setting a public hearing date for January 8 H, 2007. it was later discovered that that one phone located at 117 E. 8TH "treet operated by Western Tel had been removed. At this time, only the phone located at 115 E. 81H .rest operated by IIaro/Stewart Li.0 stills remains in place and is the subject of the public hearing. City of National City, California COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT AEETING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 ITEM TITLE Warrant Register for the period of 11/30/07 through 12/13/07 in the amount of $1,383,191.51 PREPARED BY Rizza Dela Cuadra DEPARTMENT CDC— Finance Accountant Jeanette Ladrido EXPLANATION (619) 336-4331 The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants above $50,000.00. Vendor Portillo Concrete, Inc. CDC Payroll Various Owners Ks_ See attached report. Check# Amount 17600 $563,788.42 various $78,841.32 various $599,298.17 Explanation Professional Services - Streetscape Fountain Plaza Payroll for PPE 12/03/07 Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Environmental Review ✓ NIA Financial Statement Approved bv: Citet , c QiQ✓ Jeanette Ladrido, Finance Director Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Ratification of warrants in the amount of $1,383,191.51 BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Ratification of Expenditures for the period 11/30/07 THROUGH 12/13/07 L A-200 (9/80) Pa cc Descri.'• FOR MEETING OF JANIIARY 8, 2008 WARRANT REGISTER FOR PERIOD: 11/30-12/1/07 C1 k No Amount AAA FLAG & BANNER BLIX CILRISTMAS IN 1I1I.Y CORNERSTONE HIJIIDING GROUP C ()RPORATE EXPRESS INC ESSENTIA MANAGEMENT SERVICES FARALLON DESIGN, INC. FEDEX HARRIS & ASS(R:IAIFS FRISK PARTNERS KIEINFELDER, INC. MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN PC: MOTIVATIONAL SYSTEMS INC! NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF HSG PORTII.1 J) CON(:Rh I1:, INC. PIIRI:BASE POWER SAN DIEGO CLIPPING SERVICE STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE. STATE COMPENSATION INSIIRANCE VERIZON WIREIISS PETTY CASH • C:IH.: SAN DIEGO COUNTY INTY RECORDER SAN DIEGO METROPOLITAN AAA FLAG & BANNER CHRISTENSEN SCILWERDTFEGER COMMUNITY YOUTH COPY POST PRINTING DIAMOND ENVIRONMENT'AI. SVCS FEDEX GE C:APIT'AL BARRIS & ASSOCIATES HdL COREN & CONE NATIONAL. CONSTRUCTION RENTALS POWER PLUS RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY SAFDIE RABINF_S ARCHIFFT 7IS SAN DIEGO GAS & El ECIRIC SWEETWAI1 R AUTHORITY STAPLE COMPENSATION INSURANCE SPATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE. FENCE BANNER FOR NATIONALCII•Y WEEK ADVERTISING/BRAIN-DING RENT FOR RELOCATION • 112007 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - F(ODI AND FACADE OFFICE SIJPI'I.IES PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES - WSP GRANT (:Hll.l)RFN'S RAIN FOREST PROJECT HUD OFFICES IN LA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - FOODI AND FACADE - 09/2007 CONSULTING SERVICES - 112007 PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES - NCB 2ND TO 12111 AUDIT EXAM FOR YEAR END 06/30/07 CITY BRANDING ANNUAL NAIB2O MEMBERSHIP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ES - S'IREE ESCAPE FOUNTAIN PLAZA POSTAGE: REF71.1. NEWSPAPER CIJPPINGS DEPOSIT PREMIUM FOR WORKERS COMPENSATION PREMIUM & MANDATORY ASSESSMENT TELEI'IIONE CHARGES - 09/24 - 1023A)7 REPLI3NISI INTENT OF PETTY CASH RECORDING FEES FOR PAID OFF REHAB LOAN AD VER'11S1N(UMARKE 11NG FENCE BANNER FOR NATIONAL CITY WEEK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 1820 G AVE CDBG REIMBURSEMENT CLAIM - 08/2007 CDC POSTCARD 1NVITATION PRINTING EQUIPMENT RENTAL. WESTSIDE GRAN(' EQUIP REN'I'AI. - REDEV PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - 23RD ST. & HARRISON AVE - 102007 CDC SHARE OF CONTRACT SERVICES FENCE RENTAL - 1640 E PLAZA BLVD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - AQUATIC CENTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - HAY MARINA DRIVE 09/2007 PROFESSIONAL. SERVICES - AQUATIC CENTER UTILITIES •-921 A AVENUE- 10/16-11/14/07 U'III J17FS - 500 E PLAZA BLVD - 09/06-11/07/07 WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE - 11/2007 PREMIUM & MANDATORY ASSESSMENT SUBTOTAL- REDEVELOPMENT 17576 S 1,822.34 17580 4,108.40 17582 1,500.00 175113 10,120.00 17584 192.08 17586 6,224.75 17587 5,800.00 17588 21.09 175'A1 975.00 17591 6,493.17 17593 4,359.60 17594 2,000.00 17597 4,310.00 17598 1,252.36 17600 563,788.42 17602 1,122.08 17603 109.95 17609 1,251.93 17610 490.00 17612 264.16 17615 189.89 17616 25.00 17617 2,730.00 17618 4,199.91 17620 525.00 17621 8,333.34 17622 824.80 17623 181.55 17624 23.54 17625 209.48 17627 2.990.00 17628 1,200.00 17631 142.52 17633 195.00 17635 2,911.66 17636 9,236.32 17637 332.40 17642 6246 17644 2,068.76 17645 1,723.12 S 654,310.0/3 pj PAYROLL AIK(iAS - WEST AT SYSTEMS WEST, INC. AT&T/MC1 CALIFORNIA BAKING CI ). CULLIGAN WATER I HAMILTON MENIN & PROVISIONS JOSEPH WEBB FOODS MC:GCIRE DISTRIBUTION MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, INC PRO -EDGE KNIFE SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC MANUEL SANCI IFZ SIERRA SPRINGS INGRID SLETTENGREN SMART & FINAL, SYSCO SAN DIEGO RAY WILLIAMS JOSEPH WEBB FOODS CALIFORNIA BAKING CO. HAMII.TON MEATS & PROVISIONS MCGUIRE DISTRIBUTION PPE 12/03/07 SI)WTO'I'AL - ADMINISTRATIVE REVOLVING FUND NCNP HELIUM FEES ARMORED TRUCK SERVICES - 11/2007 TELEPHONE CHARGES - 08/01 - 09/12/07 NCNP FOOD/CONSI IMAM ES NCNP WATER SOFTNER NCNP FOOD/CONSUMABLES NCNP FOOD/CONSUMABLES NCNP FOOD/CONSUMABLES NCNP LINEN SUPPLIES NCNP JANITORIAL SIIPPI.IES NCNP SIIARPENIN(i SERVICE UTILITIES - 1415 1) AVE - 10/16 - 11/14/07 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR 102007 NCNP WATER SERVICE REIMB1IRSFMFNT CATERING SUPPLIES NCNP FOOD/CONSUMABLES NCNP FOOD/CONSUMABLES REFRIGERATION REPAIR NCNP MOOD/CONSI IM ARIES NCNP FOOD/(:ONSUMABLES NCNP MOOD/CCNNSt1MABLES NCNP I•OOI)/(X NNSUMABLES S 78,841.32 S 78,841.32 17577 $ 170.33 17578 725.27 17579 133.68 17581 935.66 17585 16.40 17589 4,949.88 17592 9,976.11 17595 1,957.05 17596 184.56 17599 3,249.83 17601 88.00 17604 1,693.08 17605 119.97 17606 37.50 17607 114.86 17608 127.55 17611 8,873.88 17613 316.64 17614 3,899.08 17619 447.60 17626 1,636.37 17629 319.20 Payee MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES", IN( : PRO -EDGE KNIFE. MANUAL SANCNFZ SIERRA SPRINGS INGRID SLETIENGREN SMART & FINAL SYSCO SAN DIEGO Ilescription NCNP I.INEN SUPPLIES NCNP JANITORIAL SUPPLIES NCNP SHARPENING SERVICE MIIFAGE REIMBURSEMENT R)R 112007 NCNP WATER SERVICE REIMIII IRSFMENT CATERING SUPPIi1 S NCNP R)OD/(Y)NSl1MABLE•S NCNP FOOD/CONSUMAB ES SUBTOTAI. - GENERAL FUND (NCNP) Gilt Nu Amount 17630 92.28 17632 1,667.39 17634 44.00 17638 50.93 17639 22.50 17640 403.25 17641 9.77 17643 2,014.84 S 44,277.46 HOUSING ASSISTANCE PAYMENTS CORPORATE FXPRRSS INC HAASC NA'IlONAL CREDIT REPOR'I7N(1 PURCHASE POWER VERIZON WIREIJSS EQUIFAX CREDIT INFi)ILMATION SVS GMAC MORTGAGE. SIRATACOM SPATE COMPENSATION NSURAN('E. MANUAL PAYMENTS S8 OFFICE SUPPLIES S8 MEMBERSHIP DUES 7/1/07-6/30Nx BACKGROUND CK FOR SB APPLICANTS POSTAGE REFllJ, PHONE GIGS FOR 924-10/23/07 CREDIT BACKGROUND CHECK S8 OE E SPACE RENTAL - DEC 2007 S8 WINDOW HNVELOPES WORKERS' COMP NOV 2007 SUBTOTAL - SECTION 8 599.298.17 10408 162.34 10409 250.00 10410 230.55 10411 1.122.08 10412 218.84 10413 50.00 10414 3,809.70 10415 197.66 111416 423.31 S 605,762.65 TOTAL OF ALL FUNDS: S 1,383,191.51 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT National City, California MEETING DATE January 8, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 rITEM TITLE SUBMISSION OF THE FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 ANNUAL REPORT OF"\ FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS AND STATUS AND USE OF LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUND (HCD REPORT) TO THE STATE CONTROLLER PREPARED BY Jeanette Ladrido, A. DEPARTMENT Finance Finance Direct EXPLANATION See attached Environmental Review Financial Statement N/A Account No STAFF RECOMMENDATION ACCEPT AND FILE the Attached Reports BOARD 1 COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft CDC audit report for the Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2007 2. Redevelopment State Controller's Report 3. Status and Use of Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (HCD report) 4. Statement of Indebtedness filed 10/1/2007 A-200 (9/80) EXPLANATION Per Health and Safety Code Section 33080.1, California Redevelopment Agencies are required to submit an annual report that contains ALL of the following: • State Controller's Annual Report of Financial Transactions • Housing and Community Development Report on the Status and Use of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund • Two copies of the Independent Financial Audit, in a component unit audit presentation with combining statements by project area and fund, to include an opinion of the agency's compliance with applicable laws and regulations governing redevelopment agencies. Failure to submit the above reports within six (6) months of the end of the agency's fiscal year may result in a penalty up to $10,000. The purpose of the State Controller's Annual Report on Financial Transactions is to provide audited financial data to the State Legislature and other interested parties about California redevelopment agencies and their activities on a basis as uniform and comparable as possible. This data is published in the Community Redevelopment Agencies Annual Report. In addition, the legislation requires the California State Controller to collect data on the housing aspects of redevelopment agencies on behalf of the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD report). The Statement of Indebtedness reports the agency's principal payments and interest payments due during the tax year. When prepared correctly, the report will disclose the following: the amount of tax increment necessary to satisfy its uses of tax increment for the life of the project, the manner in which the current years' Statement of Indebtedness was calculated and the current years' use of tax increment. The Statement of Indebtedness had been successfully completed and submitted to the Auditor & Controller of the County of San Diego on October 1, 2005. On December 28, 2007, the reports listed above were submitted to the State Controller's Office and are attached for your information. Mayor Ron Morrison Council Members Louie Natividad Frank Parra Fideles Ungab Rosalie Zurate amity Manager Chris Zapata December 28, 2007 State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting Local Government Reporting Section PO Box 942850 Sacramento, CA 94250 To Whom It May Concern: Attached are the following documents for your records: Department of Finance Finance Director Jeanette 1.adrido, CPA Financial Services Officer Tess Limfueco • Community Development Commission Component Unit DRAFT audit report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 (2 copies) • Redevelopment State Controllers Report for the Fiscal Year ended 6/30/2007 • Status and Use of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (IICD report) for the Fiscal Year ended 6/30/2007 • Statement of Indebtedness filed on 10/1/2007 The CDC audit report is in DRAFT form and will be submitted upon finalization. Please contact me at (619) 336-4331 or via email at jladridonci.national-city.ca.us if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Jear1('tte Ladrido, CPA Finance Director cc: Mayor & Councilmembcrs Chris Zapata, City Manager Brad Raulston, CDC Executive Director DRAFT COMMIJNTTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF TIIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY • Financial Statements and Supplementary Information Year ended June 30, 2007 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL Cl'I'Y Financial Statements and Supplementary Information Year ended June 30, 2007 (ABLE OF CONTENTS Page Independent Auditors' Report 1 Basic Financial Statements: Government -Wide Financial Statements: Statement of Nct Assets Statement of Activities 4 Fund Financial Statements Governmental Funds: Balance, Sheet 6 Reconciliation of Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Government -Wide Statement of Net Assets 9 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances I0 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Government -Wide Statement of Activities 12 Enterprise Funds: Statement of Net Assets 13 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Assets 14 Statement of ('ash Flows 15 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 16 Required Supplementary Information: Notes to the Required Supplementary Information 45 Schedule ofRe..�:ru;es, Expenditures and Chanr.cs in Fund Balance._. Budget and Actual - Special Revenue Funds: Community Development Block Grant 46 Section 8 Housing Assistance 47 Home Loan Program 48 HOME Program 49 Nutrition Program 50 Low and Moderate Income Housing Program 51 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF'I.HF, CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Financial Statements and Supplementary Information Year ended June 30, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS, (CONTINUED) Paue Supplementary information: Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual Redevelopment Debt Service Fund 54 Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual — Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund 55 Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 57 Schedule of Findings and Recommendations 60 DRAFT • Board of Directors Community Development Commission of the City of National City National City, California INJ)EPENI)F.NT AUDITORS' REPORT We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, and each major fiord of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (the "Commission"), a component unit of the City of National City, California as of and for the year ended June 30, 2007, which collectively comprise the Commission's basic financial statements, as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements arc the responsibility of the management of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these component unit financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained i.n Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perfotm the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the component unit financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis k r our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, .the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, and each major fund financial of the Community Development Commission of the City of National ('ity at June 30, 2007, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Commission has not presented management's discussion and analysis that the Government Accounting Standards Board has determined is necessary to supplement, although not required to be part of, the basic financial statements. 'l'he information identified in the accompanying table of contents as required supplementary information is not a required part of the basic financial statements but is supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. 1 DRAFT Board of Directors Community Development Commission of the City of National City National City, California Page Two In accordance wish Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January • , 2008 on our consideration of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of Taws, regulations, contracts, grant agreements, and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. This report is an integral part of an audit perfi hied in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. Irvine, ('a!ithus ia January , 2008 2 DRAFT ('(MMI)NI"IY DEVELOPMENT ('OMMISSION OF THE: CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Statement of Net Assets June 30, 2007 Assets Gash and investments (note 5) Cash and investments with fiscal agent (note 5) Receivables: Accounts Interest Taxes Loans First time hernebuyers loans Prepaid expense Advance to the City of National City Deposits Land held fix resale Capital assets (note 6): Nondepreciable capital assets Depreciable capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation Total assets Liabilities Accounts payable and other liabilities Accrued salaries and benefits Accrued interest payable Unearned revenue Noncurrent liabilities (note 7): Due within one year Due in inure than one year Total liabilities Net Assets Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted for low and moderate housing Unrestricted net assets (deficit) Total net assets (deficit) Governmental Activities S 18,191,055 4,856,452 215,691 189,261 369,788 2,567,897 1,210,806 235,000 18,835 12,905,136 2,050,000 826,665 43,636,586 4,453,663 52,023 166,645 922,500 2,126,149 41,860,68"/ 49,581,667 2,876.665 7,206,270 (16,028,016) (5,945,081) Business -type Activities 155,734 1,719,118 381 68,502 86,576 528,382 8,282,35 / 10,841,050 230,476 168,586 2,853,463 3,252,525 5,788,690 1,799,835 7,588,525 See accompanying notes to basic financial statements. •Total 18,346,789 6,575.570 216,072 189,261 369,788 2,56'1,897 1,210,806 68,502 235,000 105.411 12.905,136 2,578,382 9,109,022 54,477,636 4,684,139 52,023 166,645 922,500 2,294,735 44, 714,150 52,834,192 8,665,355 9,006,105 (16,028,016) _ 1,643,444 DRAFT COMM T TNITY DEVLI.OPMENT COMMISSION OF TIME CITY OF NATIONAL CUL Y Statement of Activities Year ended June 30, 2007 Governmental activities: .ow and moderate housing C.oiruntinity developinent liderest on long-term debt anil related charges Total governmental activities 13itsiness-cype activities: ow and moderate housing Interest on ;ong-terin debt and related charges Foal business type activities Total primary government Program Revenues Operating Capital Total Charges for Contributions Contributions Piogram Fxpenses _. Services and Grants and Grants Revenues $ 229,212 18,170,452 2,092' 690 20,874 10,439,998 10,460,872 70,492,354 20..874 10,439,998 10,460,872 1.857,637 995.048 960,172 1,955,520 707, 051 . 2,059.738 995,048 960,472 1,955,520. S 22,552,092 1,015,922 11,400,470 1'2 416 392 P__ , General revenues: Tax increment Investment income Other Total general revenues Change ill net assets Net assets (deficit) at beginning of year Net assets (deficit) at end of year See accompanving notes to the basic financial statements. 4 DRAFT Net (Fxpense) Revenue and Clianu,es in Net Assets Primary Government Governmental Business -type Activities Activities (229,2; 2) (7,709..580) (2,092,690) Total (229,212) (7,709,580) (2,092,690) (10,031,482) (10,031,482) 97,833 97,8-13 - go2 051) ...(202,051) (104,218) (104,218) (10,031,482) (104,218) (10,135 700) 13,.543,245 869,016 835 945 15,248,206 72,847 13,543,245 941,863 835,945 72,847 15,321,053 5,216,724 (31,371) 5,185,353 (11,161,805) 7,619,896 (3.541,909) 3 (5.945,081) 7,588,525 1,643,444 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVFLOPMFNI COMMISSION Oh THF. CiTY OF NATIONAL CITY Balance Sheet • C<iv rn1n ::tal Funds June 30. 2007 — — -_- Special Revenue Funds. ('ommunity Section S Home Development 1lousing Loan HOME Block Grant A,ssistaucc_ _program Program Assets Cash and investments (note 5) $ 1,394,745 - 2,944,322 1,515,878 Cash with fiscal agent (note 5) Receivables: Accounts - - - ltttcicst Taxes - I.oans 426 970 First time hontehuycrs butts - - 773,147 Due from other funds (note 4) - Advance to the City of National City - Deposits - 3. i"n6 Land held for resale - 1,705,802 Total asset; S 1,394,7,15 3,386 3,'t7I .2.92 3,994,827 Liabihnes and Fund Balances I.tahilitics: Accounts payable $ 1,002,6 73 89,315 Accrued payroll Due to other funds (note 4) 1,561.491 Deten-ed revenue _ Total liabilities 1,002,673 1,653.806 Fund Balances: Reserved tor: Loans receivable - 426,970 First time homebuyer loans receivable - 773,147 Advance to the City of National City - - - Land held for resale - - 1,705,802 Debt service - - - Unreserved: Undesivnatcd 392,072 (1,650,420) 2944,322 1,315,878 Total fund balances 392.072 (1,650,470) 3,371,292 3,994,827 Total liabilities and fund balances S 1,394,745 3.386 3. 37 .292 3,99,1,827 See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 6 DRAFT Debt Capital Special Revenue Funds Scrvice Projects Low and Fund Fund Totals 'JuttiUun Moderate income Redevelopment Redevelopment Governmental Program I -lousing Program Fund Fund Funds 4,597,195 2,.535,161 5,208,748 18,191,055 2,792,885 2,063,567 4,856,452 129,975 85,716 215,691 743 2,970 185,548 189,261 73,958 295,830 - 369,788 1.507,3;3 333,594 2,567,897 437,659 - 1,210,806 - - 33163,361 3,063,361 235,000 235,000 15,449 18,835 360,000 - 10,839,334 12,905,136 129,975 7,271.888 5,626,852 22,030,317 43,823,282 25,1182 65,618 - 3,270,975 4,453,663 - 52,023 52,023 1,498,870 - - 3,063,361 922,500 922,500 1,52 .952 65.618 - 4,245,498 8,491,547 1,807,333 333,594 2,567,897 437,659 1,210,806 235,000 235,000 360,000 i 0,839,334 12,905,136 5,626,852 5,626,852 (1,-393,977) 4,601.278 - 6.376,891 12,786,044 f1,393,977j 7,206,770 5,626,852 17,784,819 35,331,115 129,975 7,271,888 5,626,852 22,030.317 43,823,282 DRAFT (This page intentionally left blank) DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF TLIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Reconciliation of the Balance Sheet of Governmental Funds to the Government -Wide Statement of Net Assets June 30, 2007 Fund balances of governmental funds S _ 5, 31,735 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net assets are different because: Capital assets, net of depreciation, have not been included as financial resources in governmental fund activity. Capital assets Accumulated depreciation Long term debt and compensated absences have not been included in the governmental funds: Fax allocation bonds payable Compensated absences Accrued interest payable for the current portion of interest due on bonds payable has not been reported in the governmental funds. Net assets (deficit) of tovernmental activities See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 9 4,581,1 63 (1,704,498) (43,885,000) (101,816>) (166,645) 15,945,081) DRAFT COMMIINITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISS1UN OF -111E CITY OF NA' IONAI_ CITY Statement of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Govcrruncntai Funds For the year ended June 30. 2007 Revenues: Property taxes Subventions and grants HII.P payments Interest income Other income Special Revenue Funds Community Section 8 Home Development. I lousing Loan HOME Block Grant Assistance Program Program 3 1,698,406 103 8,204,943 - 108,555 16,052 4,719 353 30,035 560 Total revenues 1,698.862 Expenditures: Current: I'ersonnel services 36,871 Special services 58,44'; Community development 1,840,806 Capital outlay Debt Service: Principal payments Interest and fiscal charges 8.234,978 16,612 113 274 668,855 474 58,389 184?04 - 5,332 ?22.).i3'' 81 3,841 Total expenditures _ 1,916,120 8,083,673 855 67,562 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (217,258) 1 5 i .505 15,757 45,712 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (note 3) - - Transfers out (note 3) - (382,978) Total other financing sources (uses) (382,978) - Net change in fund balance (217,258) (231,673) 15,757 45,712 Fund ha lance (deficit), beginning of year 609,330 r 1,41 8,7:1 ) 3.355,535 3,949,1 15 Fund balance (deficit), end of year S 392,072 (1,650,.;20) 3,37: .292 3,994,8277 See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 10 DRAFT tinecial Revenue Funds I_ow and Debt Service Fund Nutrition `:locictate Income Reeevclopwent Program. Housing Program Fund 2,708,649 10,83 �1,596 367.215 17,783. 216,41d 881659 2,726,431 4 37,915 103,735 261,934 62,013 151,353 15.846 803.884 229,212 123,421 Capital Projects Fund Redevelopment Fund 60,849 727,813 588,583 10,958,017 1,37 7,245 83,850 1,403,276 1,909,283 3971,51.5 2,117 2,000,000 2,033,220 65,050 4,1 17,070 7,351.241 (219,925) 2,497,219 6,840,947 (5,973,996) 686,783 5,022,978 (686,783) (4,640,000) (686,7833 (3,953,217) 5,022,978 (219.925) 1,810,436 2,887,730 (951018) .. (1,171,052) 5,395,834 2,739,122 18,735,837 O.:193,977) z _ 7,206,270 5,626,852 17,784,819 11 Total Govettunental Funds 13,543,245 10,4 39,998 20,874 869,016 835,945 25,709,078 2.667.793 2,476,200 13319,66(7 7,394 2,000,000 2,1)98,270 22,569,317 3,139,761 5,709,761 (5,709,761) 3,139,761 32,191,9'74 15,331,735 DRAFT COMMUNITY 1)FVEI.OPMENT COMMISSION OF TIIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Government -Wide Staieurerits of Activities Year ended June 30, 2007 Changes in fund balances of governmental funds $ 3,139,761 Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities differs from the amounts reported in the statement of activities because: Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. Ilowever, in the statement of activities, the costs of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation expense. Depreciation expense (81,667) Repayment of bond principal is an expenditure in the governmental funds, but the repayment reduces long term liabilities in the statement of net assets. 2.000,000 The statement of activities includes accrued interest on long-term deht. This is the. net change in interest payable expense for the current period. 5,580 Compensated absences expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore arc not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. 153,050 Change in net assets of governmental activities $ 5,216,724 See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 12 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF lHL CITY OF NATIONAL. CITY Statement of Net Assets - Enterprise Funds June 30, 2007 Kimball Morgan Towers "lowers Total Assets Current assets: Cash and investments (notes 2 and 5) 147,907 Accounts receivable 381 Prepaid expense 32,749 Deposits 45,093 Total current assets _ 226,130 Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agent (notes 2 and 5) 1,051,300 7,827 35.753 41,421 85,063 15i,73 { .381 68,502 86,5 76 :311,193 667.818 1.719.118 Noncurrent. assets: Capital assets (note 6): Nondepreciablc assets 315,814 212,568 :328.382 Depreciable capital assets, net of accumulated depreciation 5,037,94? 3,244 410 8.282,357 Total capital assets 5,353,761 3,456.978 8,810,739 Total assets 6,631,191 4,209,859 10,841,050 Liabilities Current liabilities: Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Notes payable -due within one year (note 7) 55,726 Total current liabilities 55,726 Noncurrent liabilities: Tenant security deposit liability Note Payable-cic in more than one year (note 7) total noncurrent liabilities 88,175 14 3,90 1 168,586 168,586 256,761 312,48! 15,092 41.483 2,853,463 45,092 2,894,946 Total liabilities 100,818 Net Assets Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Restricted for: IIousing 5,353,761 86,575 2,853,463 2,940 038 3,151,707 3,252,525 434,929 5,7SS.690 1,176,612. 623.22 3 Total net assets `e 6,530,373 1,058.152 Sec accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 13 . 1,799,835 7,588,525 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Statement of Revenues, Expenses and C'hanges in Net Assets Enterprise Funds Year ended June 30, 2007 Kimho' l Moman 'lowers "lowers Total Operating revenues: Rental income 501,087 478,656 979,743 Section 8 housing assistance payments 382,863 577,609 960,472 Other 1.448 7,857 15,305 Total operating revenues 891.398 Operati IT expenses: Maintenance and operation • 192,370 'Depreciation 187.350 Total operating expenses Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Interest income Interest expense 979,720 188,322) 47,701 I ,064,122 1,955,520 654,149 223.818 877 ,967 186,155 1,446,519 411,168 1,857,687 • 97,833 25,146 72,847 (202.051) (202,051) Total nonoperating revenues (expense) 47,701 (176,9n (129,204) Change in net assets (40,621) 9,250 (31,371) Net assets at beginning of year 6,570,99,4 1.048,902 7,619,896 Net assets at end of year S 6.530,373 1,058,152 7,588,525 See accompanying notes to the basic financial statements. 14 DRAFT COMMUNITY I)FVEI.OPMENT COMMISSION (1F THE CITY OF NA 110:NA!. CITY Staterne' of Cash Flows - Entet prise Funds Year ended June 30, 2007 Cash flours from operating activities: Cash received from customers and government agencies Cash payments to employees for services Cash payments to suppliers for goods and sci vices Net cash provided by (.used for) operating activities (:ash flows front investing actiVl:r :: Purchase: o`prouerty plant and equipmcn: Net cash provided by uscd for) investing activities Cash flows from financing activiucs: Principal pays ....s on note payable interest income hiterest expense Ktmhall Morgsu Towers Towers Dotal $ 896.597 1.056 493 1,953,090 (168,380) (168,380) (791,449) (442,992) (1,234,441) 105,148 445,121 550,269 (60,315) _ (202,140) (262,655) (60,3i5) ,(202,340) (262,655) 47•70i (158,005) (158,005) 25,146 72,847 (202,0> i) (.2.02;051) Net cash provided by (used foil financing activities 47,7(11 (334,910) (287,209) lrcressc Idecreasc) m c tsl; and investments 92,534 (92,129) 405 Cash and investments (including cash and investments with fiscal agent): (3egmnmp ofear 1,106,673 _ 767,774 1,874,447 End ofycar 1,199,207 675,645 1,874,852 Recoiled iatior, of ope:atmg income (Joss) to net cash pi ncided b, (used for) operating act•. vines: Operator,°, income (loss) (88,522) 18ti,15 97,833 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used foi) operating activities: Depreciation 187,350 223,818 11,168 (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable 4,559 1,559 (Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses 641 513 1,154 (Increase) decrease, in deposits (521) (878) (1,399) increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 921 34,635 35.556 Increase (decrease> in tenant security deposit liability 520 878 _ 1,2,98 Total adiust:•nents __ 193 70 _ 258,966 452,436 Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities S 105,148 415,121 550,269 Non s'n inves_:rig, capital and flrarcinn ::ctivnies There were no :igmfi:;::nt noncash investing, capita; :.: financing activities for the yeai ended June 30, 23P7 See accompanying notes to basic financial statements. 15 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION C)F THE CITY OF NATIONAL, (:iTY Notes to Basic Financial Statements Year ended June 30, 2007 (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The basic financial statements of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (the "Commission"), a component unit of the City of National City (the "City"), have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles as applied to government units. The Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) is the accepted standard -setting body for establishing governmental accounting and financial reporting principles. The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies of the Commission. (a) Description of the Reporting Entity The Community Development Commission of the City of National City (the "Commission") was established in April 1967 pursuant to provisions of the California Health and Safety Code. The Commission is subject to the oversight responsibility of the City Council of the City of National City (the "City") and, accordingly, is a component unit of the City, although it is a separate legal entity. The Commission's primary purpose is to eliminate blighted areas within the City by encouraging development of residential, commercial, industrial, recreational and public facilities and to assist neighborhood redevelopment through residential property improvement loans and housing assistance payments to low and moderate income earners, The Commission accounts for its financial position and operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States applicable to governmental units. (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus The basic financial statements of the Commission are composed of the following: • Government -wide financial statements • Fund financial statements • Notes to the basic financial statements Government — Wide Financial Statements The Commission's government -wide financial statements include a Statement of Net Assets and a Statement of Activities. 'These statements present summaries of governmental activities for the Commission. 16 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ()F THE CITY (.31= NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements ((:ontinued) t1) Summary of Significant Accounting-Policics, (Continued) (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus, (Continued) Government Wide Financial Statements (Continued) Cloven -Intent -wide financial statements are presented using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Accordingly, all of the Commission's assets and liabilities, including capital assets, as well as infrastnrcture assets, and long-term liabilities, are included in the accompanying Statement of Net Assets. The Statement of Activities presents changes in net assets. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the period in which they are earned, while expenses arc recognized in the period in which the liability is incurred. Certain types of transactions are reported as program revenues for the Commission in three categories: Charges for services Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Interfund transfers have been eliminated as prescribed by GASB Statement No 34 in regards to interfnnd activities. Fund Financial Statements The underlying accounting system of the Commission is organized and operated on the basis of separate funds, each of which is considered to he a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for xwith a separate set of self -balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Govenunental resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they arc to be spent and the means by which spending activities ,,re controlled. Fund financial statements for the Commission's governmental and proprietary funds are presented after the government -wide financial statements. An accompanying schedule is presented for the governmental funds to reconcile and explain the differences in fund balance as presented in these statements to the net assets presented in the govermnent-wide financial statements. The Commission has presented all major funds that met the applicable criteria. 17 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL. CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (11_ Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, (Continued) (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus (Continued) Governmental Funds In the fund financial statements, governmental tunas are presented using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. Measurable means that the amounts can be estimated, or otherwise determined. Available means that the amounts were collected during the reporting period or soon enough thereafter to he available to finance the expenditures accrued for the reporting period. The Commission uses a sixty day availability period. The primary revenue sources, which have been treated as susceptible: to accrual by the Commission, are property tax, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues and other taxes. Expenditures are recorded in the accountings. period in which the related fund liability is incurred. Deferred revenues arise when potential revenues do not meet both the measurable and available criteria for recognition in the current period. Deferred revenues also arise when the government receives resources before it has a legal claim to them, as when grant monies are received prior to incu1Ting qualifying expenditures. In subsequent periods, when both revenue recognition criteria are met or when the government has a legal claim to the resources, the deferred revenue is removed and revenue is recognized. In the fund financial statements, _governmental funds are presented using the Current financial resources measurement focus. This means that only current assets and current liabilities are generally included on their balance sheets. The reported fund balance (net current assets) is considered to be a measure of available spendable resources. Governmental fund operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Accordingly, they arc said to present a summary of sources and uses of available spendable resources during a period. Amounts expended to acquire capital assets arc recorded as expenditures in the year that resources were expended, rather than as fund assets. The proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as an other financing source rather than as a fund liability. Amounts paid Io reduce long-term indebtedness are reported as fund expenditures. The Reconciliation of the Fund Financial Statements to the Goverrunent-Wide Financial Statements is provided to explain the differences created by the integrated approach of the GASB Statement No. 3.4. to DRAFT COMIvIl lNlTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF TIIE CITY OF NATIONAL. CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) Ll) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, (Continued) (I)) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focusj ontmued) Proprietary Funds The Commission's enterprise funds are proprietary funds. In the fund financial statements, proprietary funds are presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when they are earned and expenses arc recognized when the related goods or services are delivered. In the fund financial statements, proprietary funds are presented using the economic resources measurement focus. This means that all assets and all liabilities (whether current or noncurrent) associated with their activity are included on their balance sheets. Proprietary fund type operating statements present increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total net assets. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services, and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating, revenues of Kimball Powers and Morgan Towers are charges to tenants for housing low and moderate income seniors, which is subsidized with Federal government funds under a Section 8 contract with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Operating expenses for the proprietary funds include the cost of services, administrative expenses, and depreciation on capital assets. All revenue and expenses not mating this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets in the proprietary fund financial statements, rather than reported as an expenditure. Proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as a liability in the proprietary fund financial statements, rather than as an other financing source. Amounts paid to reduce long- term indebtedness of the proprietary funds are reported as a reduction of the related liability, rather than as an expenditure. ifajor Fcotds The Commission reports the following major governmental funds: Community Development Block Grant — To account for activities related to the annual grant from the Department of' Housing and Urban Development to assist in developing viable urban community by providing decent housing and a suitable living environment, and by expanding economic opportunities, principally for low and moderate income persons. 19 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (l) Summary of Significant AccountingPolic.ies, (Continued) (b) Basis of Accounting and Measurement Focus. (Continued) 1fujor FuncLr,_(Cnntinlied) Section 8 Housing Assistance To provide rental assistance to low income families by subsidizing a portion of the rent directly to landlords on behalf of low income households. Home Loan Program To provide home improvement loans to low and moderate incornc families that meet certain conditions to qualify for the Iran. HOME Program — To account for activities related to the annual grant from the Department of Housing and Urban Development to administer programs designed to provide decent affordable housing, expand capacity of nonprofit housing providers, and to leverage private sector participation. Nutrition Program — This program provides a friendly setting for low income and minority seniors to have a nutritionally balanced meal. The Nutrition Council and volunteers provide an effective framework to assist in the meal distribution, solicitation of funds and social services needs of clients. Low and Moderate Income Housing Program — To account for the tax increment which is required to be set aside under Section 33334.2 of the California Health and Safety Code to increase, improve or preserve the community's supply of low and moderate income housing. Redevelopment Debt Service Fund •- To account for the accumulation of resources for the payment of principal, interest, and related costs of the Commission's long- term debt. Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund — To account for the administrative expenditures of the Commission and redevelopment capital projects. In addition, the Commission also reports the following major proprietary funds: Kimball Towers — To account for the activities relating to the operations of Kimball 'rower which use is restricted to housing low and moderate income seniors. Morgan Towers — To account for the activities relating to the operations of Morgan Tower which use is restricted to housing low and moderate income seniors. 20 D KAt- I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (1) Summary of Siscniticant Accounting Policies,(Continued) (c) (_ashand Investments The Commission's investment policy authorizes deposits in any of the approved investments contained in the California Government. Code Sections i 3600 et seq. During the year ended June 30, 2007, the Commission complied with these policies. Investment income earned on unrestricted cash is allocated to the Commission's various funds as required by grartiloan agreements or at the Board's discretion. The Commission pools its available cash with the City for investment purposes. The City considers pooled cash and investment amounts, with original maturities of three months or less, to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are combined with investments and displayed as cash and investments. In accordance with GASI3 Statement No. 31, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Certain Investments and for External Investment Pools, highly liquid market investments with maturities of one year or less at. time of purchase arc stated at amortized cost. All other investments are stated at fair value. Market value is used as fair value for those securities for which market quotations are readily available. The Commission participates in an investment pool managed by the State of California titled Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) which has invested a portion of the pool funds in Structured Notes and Asset -backed Securities. LAIF's investments are subject to credit risk with the full faith and credit of thc State of California. collateralizing these investments. In addition, these Structured Notes and Asset -backed Securities are subject to market risk as to change in interest rates. (d) Land I-Ield for Resaic (c) Land held for resale is recorded at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Fund balances are reserved in amounts equal to the carrying value of land and buildings held for resale, because such assets are not available to finance the Commission's current operations Use of Restricted/Net Assets When an expense is incurred for purposes for which both restricted net assets are available, the Commission's policy is to apply restricted not assets first. 21 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ()F TIIE CITY ()F NATIONAI. CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (l) Summary of Sigrri[leant Accounting Policies, (Continued) (0 Intcrfund Transactions (g) .Activity between funds that are representative of lending/borrowing arrangements outstanding at the end of the fiscal near are referred to as either "due to/from other funds" (i.e., the current portion of intcrfiurd loans) or "advances to/from other funds" (i.e., the noncurrent portion of interfund loans). Interest Payable In the government -wide financial statements, interest payable of long terra debt is recognized as the liability is incurred for governmental find types. In the fund financial statements, govenunental Lund types do not recognize the interest payable when the liability is incurred. Rather, interest expense is simply recorded when it is due or paid. (h) Lom; "mein Liabilities (i) Government -Wide Financial ,Statements Long terra debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the pi Unary government's governmental activity. Fund Financial Statements - The fund financial statements do not present long- term debt but are shown in the Reconciliation of the Ciovemmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Government -Wide Statement of Net Assets. Net Assets in the government -wide financial statements, net assets are classified in the following categories: Invested in Capital Assets, net of Related Debt - This amount consists of capital assets net of accumulated depreciation and reduced by outstanding debt that attributed to the acquisition, construction, or improvement of the assets. Restricted Net Assets • This amount is restricted) by external creditors, grantors, contributors, laws or rcp,ulations of other zovcrnments. Unrestricted Net Assets This amount is all net asserts that do not meet the definition of "invested in capital assets, net of related debt" or "restricted net assets." 22 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOP1v1FNT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL, CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (]) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, (Continued) (j) Fund Balances — Reservations and Desi}nations in the fund financial statements, governmental funds report reservations of fund balances !Or amounts that arc not available for appropriation or are legally restricted 1>y outside parties for use of a specific purpose. Designations of fund balance represent tentative management plans that are subject to change. (6:) Property Tax Increments One of the Commission's primary sources of revenue is from property tax increments. The assessed valuation of all property within the Downtown Redevelopment Project arca was determined on the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. Property taxes related to the incremental increase in assessed values after the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan are allocated to the Commission; all taxes on the "frozen" assessed valuation of the property are allocated to the City and unrelated taxing agencies. (I) Use of Estimates The preparation of the basic financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. In addition, estimates affect the reported amount of expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates and assumptions. •Enterprise Fuld Restricted Cash In necrnclance with 1_)eparirnent of I -lousing and (Irban Development (HUD) requirements, the Morgan Towers Enterprise Fund maintains the following restricted cash accounts: Reserve for replacements of $468,165 represents a monthly deposit of $3,127, less cun-ent use for replacement, plus income earned thereon. The balance of this reserve will be used fbr the future replacement of property with HUD's approval. Residual receipts reserve of $183,050 is an accumulation of surplus cash as calculated by HUD's Computation of Surplus Cash, Distributions and Residual Receipts, which can be expended only with HUD's approval. Reserve for MIY and insurance impounds of $1.2,722 and $3,881, respectively, totaling S16,603, which represents amounts held for the future payment of property and mortgage insurance. 23 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (2) Enterprise Fund Restricted Cash, (Continued) Additionally, the Kimball Towers Enterprise Fund maintains the following HTJD restricted cash accounts: Residual receipts reserve of $283,102 is an accumulation of surplus cash as calculated by HUD's Computation of Surplus Cash, Distributions and Residual Receipts, which can be expended only with HUD's approval. Other restricted cash and investments totaling S768,198 are included in the accompanying basic financial statements. (3) Transfers lnil'ransfers Out The following schedule summarizes the Commission's transfer activity: Transfers In Transfers Out Amount Redevelopment Debt Service Fund Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund S 686,783 (a) .Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund (a) Section 8 Housing Assistance Fund 382,978 (b) Redevelopment Debt Service Fund 4,640,000 (c) Total . 5,7Q9,761 The Low and Moderate Income housing Fund transferred $686,783 to the Redevelopment Debt Service Fund to fund a portion of the 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds debt service payments that related to low and moderate development. (b) 'fhe Section 8 Housing Assistance Fund transferred $382,978 to the Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund as reimbursement for prior year operating expenses. (c) The Redevelopment Debt Service Fund transferred funds to the Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund to provide for future capital project expenditures. 24 DRAFT COMMIMt1NITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements ((..!ontinued) (4) Due From and To Other Funds Interfnnd receivable and payable balances at June 30, 2007 are as follows: Due from Other Funds Due to Other Funds Amount Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund Section 8 Housing Assistance Fund S 1.564,491 Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund Nutrition Fund . 1,498 870 Total $: 063,:361 interfund receivables and payables were created in order to eliminate deficit :ash balances. (5) Cash and Investments Cash and investments as of June 30, 2007 are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows: Statement of Net Assets: Cash and investments Cash and investments with fiscal agent $ 18,346,789 6 575,570 Total cash and investments $ 24.922.359 Cash and investments as of June 30, 2007 consist of the following: Cash on hand 800 Deposits wiih financial institutions 2.964, 165 Investments 2 1.957.394 Total cash and investments • $ 24,9' 1i 25 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF TILE CITY ()F NATIONAL. CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (5)Cash and Investments, (Continued) investments Authorized by the California Government Code and the Commission's Investment Policy The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized for the Commission by the California Government Code and the Commission's investment policy. The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Ciovernment Code (or the Commission's investment policy, if' more restrictive) that address interest rate risk and concentration of credit risk. This table does not address investments of debt proceeds held by fiscal agent that are governed by the provisions of debt ai'rccments of the Commission, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the Commission's investment policy. hlvestment. types Authorized by State Law Local Agency Bonds U.S. Treasury Obligations U.S. Agency Securities Banker's Acceptances Commercial Paper Negotiable Certificates ofneposit Repurchase Agreements Reverse Repurchase Agreements Medium -Term Notes Mutual Funds :Money Miuket Iviutuai Funds Mortgage Pass -Through Securities County Pooled Investment Funds Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) .IPA Pools (other investment pools) Authorized By Investment *Maximum Policy ;Maturity Yes 5 years Yes 5 years Yes 5 years Yes 180 days Yes 270 days Yes 5 years Yes 1 year No 92 days Yes 5 years , Yes N/A Yes N/A Yes 5 years Yes N/1 Yes 'N/A Yes N/A `Maximum Percentage 01 Portfolio None None None 40"/0 25% 30% None 20% of base value 30% 15% 20% � .o 20`.'% None None Nitric 'Maximum Investment in One Issuer None None None 30% 10% None None None None l0% 10% None None None None Based on state law requirements or investment policy reouirements, whichever is more restrictive. 26 DRAFT (5) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ()F THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (dash and Investments, (Continued) Investments Authorized by Debt Agreements investment of debt proceeds held by fiscal agent are governed by provisions of the debt aitrcements, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the Commission's investment policy. The table below identifies the investment types that are generally authorized for investments held by fiscal agent. The table also identifies certain provisions of these debt agreements that address interest rate risk and concentration of credit risk. Authorized investment Type Maximum Maximum Maximum Percentage Investment Maturity Allowed in One issuer U.S. Treasury Obligations None None None U.S. Agency Securities None None None Banker's Acceptances 360 days None Nome Commercial Paper 270 days None None Money Market Mutual Funds N/A None None Investment Contracts 30 years None None Certificates of Deposit None None None Repurchase Agreements None None None Mortgage Pass -Through Securities None None None State Bonds or Notes None None None N4unicipa! Bonds or Notes None None None Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment; the i",rcater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. One of the ways that the Commission manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of shorter term and longer term investments and by tinning, ;:ash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturity evenly o\ et time as necessary to provide the cash flow and liquidity needed for operations. 27 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAI. CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (5) Cash and Investments. (Continued) Information about the sensitivity of the: fair values of the Commission's investments (including investments held. by fiscal agent) to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the Commission's investments by maturity: Investment Type Total U.S. Agency Securities S 089,000 Negotiable Certificates of Deposit 1,558,000 Local Agency Investment Fund (T.AIF) 14,853,942 Held by Fiscal Agent: Commercial Paper 2,345,000 Money Market Funds 2,51 t-,452 Total S 21.957,32 Disclosures Relating to C'redit Risk Remaining 12 Months or Less 586,000 14,833,942 2,345,000 2,51.1..452 Maturity (in 13 to 24 Months 300,000 877,000 Months) 25 to 60 Months 389,000 95,000 20,296.39.4 1,1L71100 484.000 Cieneraily, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Presented below is the minimum rating required by (where applicable) the California Government Code, the Commission's investment policy, or debt agreements, and the actual rating as of year end for each investment type. Investrnent Type U.S. Agency Securities Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Local Agency Investment Fund (L.'UF) I-lcld by Fiscal Agent: Commercial Paper Money Market Funds Total Minimum Rating as of Year End Legal Not Total Rating A AAA Rated S 689,000 AAA - 689,000 1,558,000 N/A - - 1,558,000 14,853,942 N/A - - 14,853,942 2,345,000 A - - 2,345,000 2,511,452 A 2,511.457 -. - $21,957,394 28 2,511 4?2 689,000 18.756.942 DRAFT (5} COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) Cash and Investments. (Continued) Concentration of Credit Risk The investment policy of the Commission contains no limitations on the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond that stipulated by the California Government Code. Investments in any one issuer (other than U.S. Treasury securities, mutual funds. and external investment pools) that represent 5% or more of total Commission investments are as follows: Investment Reported Issuer Tvpe Amount General Electric Commercial Paper 2,315 000 Custodial Credit Risk Custodial credit risk fiir deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterpart), (e.g., broker -dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The California Government Code and the Commission's investment policy do riot contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits or investments, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110% of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. Califi,rrtia law also allows financial institutions to secure Commission deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150% of the secured pubiic deposits. As of June 30, 2007, Commission investments in the following investment types were held by the same broker dealer (enunterparty) that was used by the Commission to buy the securities: Investment -I've U.S. Agency Securities Negotiable Certificates of Deposit Reported Amount i R') 000 1,558,000 For investments identified heroin as held by fiscal agent, the fiscal agent selects the investment under the temrs of the applicable trust agreement, acquires the investment, and holds the investment on behalf of the reporting government. 29 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF '1'FIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) L5) .. Cash and Investments, (Continued) Investment in State Investment Pool The Commission is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Funcl (L.AIT•) that is regulated by the California Government Code under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the Commission's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanyim2, financial statements at amounts based upon the Commission's pro-rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAUF portfolio (in relation to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The hal.ance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by i.AIF, which arc recorded on an amortized cost basis. 0)___ (:apital_Asscts The following is a summary of capital assets for the year ended Junc 710, 2007: Balance, at Balance at July 1. 2006 Additions Deletions June 30 2007 Government .Activities: Capital assets: Buildings and improvements S 2,450,000 Machinery and equipment 81 163 Total cost of depreciable capital assets Less accumulated depreciation: Buildings and Improvements Machinery and equipment Total accumulated deprec:at on 2,450,000 S1.163 _ 2 531_.163 — _ - 2.5 31.163 (1,541.6681 LL1 1(i') t 11.622.83 1 Depreciable capital assets, net 908,332 Capital assets not depreciated: Land Capital assets, net (81.661) (1,623,335) (81.163) (81,667) (1.704.498) (81,667) - 826,665 2.050.000 2,050,000 2,958,3,.3.? (81.661) 2,$7tj,66. Depreciation expense in governmental activities for capital assets for the year ended June 30, 2007 was S81,667 which was allocated to community development. 30 DRAFT COMMI INITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAI. CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (6) Capital Assets, (Continued) 13usincas-Type Activities: Depreciable assets: Buildings and improvements Furniture and equipment Total rose of depreciable assets t.es accumulated depreciation: 13ui d r, t, and improvements Furniture and equipment .foul accumulated depreciation Depreciable capital assets, net Capital assets not depreciated Land Capital assets. net Balance at July 1, 2006 Additions $ 15,501,663 270.1_5 130,221 1 3{4 15 771 778 262.655 (7,292,582) (407,040) (48 326) (4.128) (7,340,908) (411,168) 8,430,870 (148.5I3) 528.382 $__59252 (148,513) Balance at Deletions Tune 30. 2007 15,631,884 402.549 (6.03�4,43 3 (7,699,622) (52,454) (7.752.076) 8,282,357 528,382 g,l}10_739 Depreciation expense in business -type activities for capital assets for the year ended Turf: 30, 2007 was $41 1,168, which was allocated to low and moderate housing. 31 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OE THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (7) .... _Long -Term Liabilities Thc ICIlowing is a summary of changes in long-term liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2007: Amounts Amount Balance Balance Due Within Due Beyonc July 1 2006. Additions Deletions June 30,7.0(17 One Year One Year Governmental Activities: Bonds payable: 1999 'Fax Allocation Bonds 5 4,540,000 (105.000) 4.435,000 110.000 4,325,000 2004Series Tax Allocation Bonds 5,640,000 (245,000) 5,395,000 250,000 5,145,000 2005 Series A Tax Allocation Bonds 25,865,000 (1,650,000) 24,2 i 5,000 1,705,000 22 510,000 2005 Series B Tax Allocation Bonds 9,810 000 - 'I 840 000 9,840,000 Total hoods payable 45,885,000 (2.000,000) 43,885, t00 2,065,000 41,420,000 Compensated absences _.254.886 = (133,050) . 101.436 61 149 40.6S7 'rota] govcr!merit al activities 46,139,846 (2,1'33,050) :3,986,836 2,126,149 41,860,687 Business -Type Activities: Notes Payable .3 140.054 --- (158 005) _3,022.049 168 46 2 853 463 Total business -type activities _ 3.180.054 . - (158 005) 3.022.049 168.586 2,853,463 'total $49.319,940 - .(2,311,05, !1,00 ,8RS _2.=94,23,5 44,714,150 1999 Ku Allocation Bonds' In June 1999, the Commission issued S5,050,000 in Tax Allocation Bonds for the Q Redevelopment project. The bonds consist of S1,0S5,000 in serial bonds which mature from 2000 to 2010 in amounts ranging from S45.000 to S125,000, and SI,425,000 in term bonds which mature in 2019, and S2,540,000 it) term bonds which mature in 2029. Interest is payable semi-annually on February 1 and August 1, at interest rates ranging from 3.30% to 4.50% 32 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF TIIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continneii) (7)_.., 1,one,-Tenn Liabilitie1(Continucdl The annual debt service requirements for the 1999 Tax Allocation Bonds outstanding Est June 30, 2007 ate as follows: Fiscal Year 'Principal Interest Total 2008 S 110,000 219,586 329,586 2009 115,000 214,802 329.802 2010 120,000 209,690 329,690 2011 125,000 204,237 329237 2012 130.000 198,175 328,175 2013 135,000 191,550 326,550 2014 145,000 184,550 329,550 2015 150,000 177,176 321,176 2016 155,000 169,550 374,550 2017 165,000 161,549 326,549 2018 175,000 153,050 328,050 2019 180,000 144,175 324,175 2020 190,000 134,925 32.1,925 2021 200,000 125,050 325,050 2022 210,000 114,543 324,543 2023 220,000 103,525 123,525 20)4 235,000 91,866 326,866 2025 245,000 79,566 324,566 2026 260,000 66,625 326,625 2027 270,000 53,044 323,044 2028 285,000 30 822 323,822 2029 300,000 23,831 323,831 2030 315,000 8.072 323,072 Total 54 435.000 14167 259 7,502,9=y 33 DRAFT COMMIJNLTY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF TILE CITY OF NATIONAL. ('ITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (7) Long -Tenn Liabilities. (Continued) 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds In .Tune 2004, the Commission issued S5,860,000 in Tax Allocation Bonds to finance a portion of the cost to construct a fire station, library, and community art center. The bonds consist of $3,045,000 in serial bonds which mature from 2005-2015 in amounts ranging from $220,000 to S330,000, and S1,085,000 in terrn bonds which matures in fiscal year 2029. Interest is paid semi• annually on February 1 and August 1, at interest rates ranging from 1.50°/0 to 5.50%. The annual debt service requirements for the 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds outstanding at June 30, 2007 are as follows: Fiscal Year Princinal interest Total 2008 S 250,000 238,300 488,300 2009 2.60,000 231,348 491,348 2010 265,000 223,53,1 488,534 2011 775,000 14,685 489,685 2012 285,000 204,880 489,880 2013 295,000 194,145 489,145 2014 305,000 182,440 487,440 2015 2,045,000 122,307 2,167,307 2016 330,000 61,263 391,263 2017 54,250 54,250 2018 54,250 54,250 2019 54,250 54,250 2020 - 54,250 54,250 2021 - 54,250 54,250 2022 - 54,250 54,250 2023 - 54,250 54,250 2024 54,250 54,250 2025 •- 54,250 54,250 2026 - 54,250 54,250 2027 345,000 45,625 390,625 2028 3(>0,000 28,000 388,000 2029 _ 380,000 9.500 389,500 Total , ti_395,000 2 298,27 7 693Z527 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NA'I'I()NAI, CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) _1 (uif'-'Fenn Liabilities, (Continued) 2005 Series A Tax Allocation Bonds In January 2005, the Commission issued $27,940,000 in Tax Allocation Bonds, Series A lbr the purpose of refunding the Commission's 2001 Series A Tax Allocation Bonds. Interest on the bonds is payable semiannually on August 1 and February. 1, commencing August 1, 2005, at rates ranging from 2.9% to 4.85% per annum. The annual debt service requirements for the 2005 Series A Tax Allocation Bonds uutstandinit at June 30, 2007 are as follows: Fiscal Year Principal Interest Total 2008 S 1,705,000 1,091,543 2,796,543 2000 1,765,000 1,027,605 2,792.605 2010 1,840,000 957,005 2,797,005 201 1 2,125,000 879,725 3,004,725 2012 3,060,000 788,350 3,848, 350 2013 3,200,000 650,650 3,850,650 2014 3,345,000 503,450 3,848,45(1 2015 3,505,000 346,235 3,851,235 2016 3,670,000 1.77,99.5 3,847 995 Total $241 215,000 6,422,558 - 637,558 2005 Series B Tax Allocation Bonds In January 2005, the Commission issued $9,840,000 in Tax Allocation Bonds, Series B for the purpose of refunding the ('ommission's 2001 Series B Tax Allocation Bonds. Interest on the bonds is payable semiannually on August 1 and February 1, commencing August 1, 2005, at rates ranging from 3.8°%0 to 5.25 io per annum. 5 DRAFT (7) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 0.1 THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) 1,ong-Perm Liabilities. (Continued) The annual debt service requirements kir the 2005 Series B Tax Allocation Bonds outstanding al June 30, 2007 are as loliows: Fiscal Year Prineival interest Total 2008 $ 444,693 444,693 2009 444,693 444,693 2010 - 444,693 444,693 2011 444,693 444,693 2012 - 444,693 444,693 2013 - 444,693 444,693 2014 444,693 444,693 2015 - 444,693 444,693 2016 - 444,693 444,693 2017 760,000 444,693 1,204,693 2018 790,000 415,813 1,205,813 2019 825,000 385,003 1,210,003 2020 855,000 352,003 1,207,003 2021 890,000 317,803 1,207,803 2022 570,000 277,753 847,753 2023 595,000 253,528 848,528 2024 780,000 227,943 1,007,943 2025 815,000 194,013 1,009,013 2026 855,000 153,263 1,008,263 2027 555,000 110,513 665,513 2028 435,000 81,375 516,375 2029 250.000 58,538 308,538 2030 200,000 45,413 245,413 2031 210,000 34,913 244,913 2032 220,000 23,888 243,888 2033 235,000 12338 247 338 Total $9 840,0.00 7,391.,030_ 17,231,030 36 DRAFT COMMUNITY DLVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (7) I-ong-Term Liabilities, (Continued) Note Payable The mortgage payable is secured by a deed of trust, bears interest at 6.5% and is payable to GMAC in the amount of $3,718,928. The note is being repaid in monthly installments of S30,005, including interest, through August 2019. The note is insured by HUD and is secured by substantially all property and equipment of the Morgan 'lowers :nterprise Fund. The annual principal payments of the note payable outstanding at June 30, 2007 are as follows: Fiscal Year Principal Interest Iota! 2008 S 168,586 191,474 360,060 2009 179,878 180,182. 360,060 2010 191,923 168,137 360,060 2011 204,777 155,283 360,060 2012 218,492 141,568 360,060 2013 233,124 126,936 360;060 2014 248,736 111,324 360,060 2015 265,395 94,665 360,060 2016 283,170 76,890 360,060 2017 302,136 57,924 360,060 2018 322,368 37,692 360,060 2019 343,957 16,103 360,060 2020 59 507 50I 60.010 Total 3,022,049 L 35$,681 4.380,730 37 DRAFT COMMUNi'!Y DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL. CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (7) Loni;-Term l.iahilities {Continued] Ee, laNitasitargrallittaiM i� Commitments and Contin,'cncics Grant funds received by the Commission are subject to review by the grantor agencies. Such audits could lead to requests 1br reimbursements to the grantor agencies for expenditures disallowed under terms of the -ram. The management of the Commission believes that such disallowances, it any, \vill not be significant. 12) National City Joint Powers Financing Authority The National Joint Powers Financing Authority ("JPFA") was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement entered into by and between the Commission and the City of National City on April 16, 1991. The purpose of such agreement was to provide for the financing and construction of the new police facility and Community Center. The JPFA is administered by a commission consisting of the members of the City Council and all voting power of JPFA resides in the Commission. •x DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF TIIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) t_10) Du ferrcd_Cornpensation The Commission otters its employees a deferred compensation plan created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plan, available to all full-time employees, permits them to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to employees until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. The maximum salary deferral is $7,500 per year. All amounts of compensation deferred under the plan, all property and rights purchased with those amounts, and all income attributable to those amounts, are held in trust for the exclusive benefit of plan participants and/or beneficiaries. Participants' rights under the plan are equal to the fair market value of the deferred account for each participant. Since the plan is managed and assets are held in trust by an administrator other than the Commission, the assets are no longer included in the Commission's financial statements. The assets held by the plan administrator had a market value of Lam. Employee Retirement System Plan Description The. Commission contributes to the California Public Employees Retirement System (PF.RS), a cost -sharing multiple -employer public employee defined benefit pension plan. PERS provides retirement and disability benefits, annual cost -of -living adjustments, and death benefits to plan members and beneficiaries. PERS acts as a common investment and administrative agent for participating public entities within the State of California. I3cnelit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute and the Commission's Resolution. Copies of PERS' annual financial report may be obtained from lie it executive office: 400 P Street, Sacramento, California 95814. Contributions Participants are required to contribute 7% of their annual covered salary. The Commission makes the contributions required of the ('omniission's crnpioyees on their behalf and liar their account. Benefit provisions and all other requirements are established by state statute and Commission contract with employee bargaining groups. 39 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVF1.OPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (11) Employee Retirement System, (Continued) Under GASB 27, an employer reports an annual pension cost (APC) equal to the annual required contribution (ARC) plus an adjustment for the cumulative difference between the APC and the employer's actual plan contributions for the year. The cumulative difference is called the net pension obligation (NPO). The ARC for the period July 1, 2006 to June 30, 2007 has been determined by an actuarial valuation of the plan as of June 30, 2004. The contribution rate indicated fir the eriod is 18.297% of payroll. The Commission's covered payroll for PERS was ? . for the •ear ended June 30, 2007, while the Commission's total payroll for all employees was '4`„t during the same period. In order to calculate the dollar value of the ARC.' for inclusion in financial statements prepared as of June 30, 2007, this contribution rate would be multiplied by the payroll of covered employees that 'vas actually paid during the period July 1, 2006 to June 30. 2007. .Three -Year Trend Information Fiscal Year 6/30/05 6/30/06 Annual Pension Cost (Employer Contribution) 241,262 337,857 (12) Accumulated Fund Deficits Percentage of APC Contributed 100% 100% Net Pension Obligation -0 0• The following funds reported deficits in fund balances as of June 30, 2007: Special Revenue Funds: Section 8 Housing Assistance Nutrition Program S(1,650,420) (1,393,977) Management intends on restoring accumulated fund deficits when future grant revenue becomes available. 40 DRAFT COMM[JN TY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF"I' HE CITY OF NATIONAL Cli \ Notes to Basic Financial Statements (Continued) (13) Expenditures in Excess of Appropriations Expenditures for the year ended June 30, 2007 exceeded the appropriations of the following funds: Budget Special Revenue Funds: Community Dcv. Block Grant S 1,677,171 Horne Loan Program Redevelopment Debt Service Fund d1 Actual Variance 1,916,120 (238,949) Ss5 (S55) 4.1 17,070 0,117,070) 17,070) DRAFT ('This paste imcntionally left bl;mk} DRAFT REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 43 DRAFT (This page intentionally left blank) DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Notes to the Required Supplementary lnfonnation Year ended June 30, 2007 Budgetary Information The Commission adopts an annual budget prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting for all governmental fund types. The Executive Director is required to prepare and submit to the Commission Board of Directors the annual budget of the Cornrrrission and administer it after adoption. Any revisions that alter the total appropriations must be approved by the Board of Directors. All annual appropriations lapse at fiscal year-end except for unexpended purchase orders or contracts and unexpended appropriations for capital projects. Total expenditures may not legally exceed total appropriations at the fund level. Required Disclosures Expenditures for the year ended June following special revenue funds: 30, 2007 exceeded the appropriations of die Bud eet Special Revenue Funds: Community Dev, Block Grant S1,677,171 Home Loan Program Redevelopment Debt Service Fund 45 Actual 1,9116,120 855 4,1 17,070 V ariance (238,949) (855) (4,1 17,070) DRAFT CO vfMINITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Community Development Block Grant - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expcadrtui es and Changes in Fund Hai ncc - Budget and Actual For the year ended June 30, 2007 Revenues: Subventions and grants HILP payments Other income Total revenues Expenditures: Cun ent: Personnel services Special services (:ommunity development Total expenditures Net change in fund balance Fund balance, beginning of year Fund balance, end of year Rud+'cted Amounts OriuInal final $ 1,442,619 500 1.444.1 19 i .102 1,659,069 1,677.17! (233,052) 609,330 376,278 46 1.441,619 500 Actual 1,698,406 103 353 1,444,119 1,698.862 118,102 1,659,069 36,871 38,443 1,840,806 1,677,171 1,916,12(1 (233,052) (217,258) 609,330 609,330 376,278 392.072 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) 254,787 (397) 353 2i4,743 (36,871) (20,341) (181,737) (238,949) 15,794 15,794 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Section 8 Housing Assistance - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budge; and Actual For the year ended June 30, 2007 Revelries: Subventions and grants (>ther Inarm. Total revenues L.xpencinurc<: C LI! r Cut. Personnel SOP: ices Special services (.'orrnulnity development ( apr,a outlay filial expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over ( under) expenditures Other tinancinC .Sources (uses): T I run${G`I out Total other financing sources (uses) Net fund holaiice Fund balance (deficit), beginuine of year Budgeted Amounts Original Final Actual Variance with Final Budget Positive (Ttegati e) 5 7,967,957 7,967,957 8,204,943 236,986 - 30,035 30,035 7,967,957 7,967,957 8,234,978 267,021 995,133 995,133 668,855 326,278 102,890 102,890 184,204 (81,314) 7,618,112 7,618,112 7,275,337 392,775 4,500 4,500 - ... 5,277 - .. _.-- (777) 8,720,635 8,720,635 8,08 3,67:3 636,962 (752,678) (752,678) 151,305 903,983 (382,978) (382,978) — - (382,978) (382,97 ) (7S2 F78) (752,078) (231,673) 521,005 (1,418,747) (12418,747) (1.418,"<<17) — --- Pnnd halunc (deficit.), end of year S (2.171;425) (2,171,425) (1,650,120) 521.005 47 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Home Loan Program - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Reve.nucs, Expenditures and Char.cs in Fund Balance Buill!.et and Actual For the year ended June 30, 2007 Revenues: HII.P payments Other income Total revenues Budgeted Amounts Orwirial Final Actual 16,052 560 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) 16,052 560 16,612 16,612 Fxpenditures: Current: l'ersonncl services 474 (474) Community development 381 Total expenditures 855 Net change in fund balance 15,757 Fund balance, beginning of year .3,355,53S. 3,355,535 3,355,535 Fund balance, end of year $ 3,355,535 3,355,535 3,371,292 (855) • 15,757 15,757 DRAFT COMM1 JNI'lY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF'I'lIL CITY OF NA I IONAt. CITY HOME Program - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Budget and Actual For the year ended June 30, 2007 Revenues: Subventions and grants HILP payments Total revenues Budgeted Amounts Original Final S 597,736 8,000 605,736 59 7,736 8,000 605,730 Actual Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) 108.555 (489,181) -_1.719 (3,281) 1 13,2 %4 (492,462) Expenditures. C:urrcnt Personnel services 58,246 58,246 58,389 (143) Special services 1,527 1.527 ,.312 (1,805) Community development 810,000 S 10,000 3,841 806,159 Capital outlay 537,963 537,96; „7,963 Total expenditures 1,407,7.16 1,407,736 67,562 1,340,174 Net change in fund balance (802,000) (802,000) 45,712 847,712 Fund balance., beginning of year 3,949,115 3,949,11 f 3,949,115 Fund balance, end of year S 3,147,115 3,147,1 15 3,99 4,827 847,712 49 DRAFT COMM11NITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CPI'F OF NATIONAL CITY Nutrition Progarn - Special Revenue Fund Schedule ot-Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the year ended June 30, 2007 Budgeted Amounts (irit'Mal Final Actual Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) Revenues: Subventions and grants S 303,615 103,615 367,245 63,630 Other income _ ?21.0%4 221,074 216,414 (4,660) Total revenues 524,659 524,689 583,659 58,970 Expenditures: Current: Personnel services 875,41 5 875,435 437,915 437,520 Special services 54,858 54,858 103,735 (48,877) Community development 262,600 2.62,600 261,934 666 Capital outlay 100 700 700 "Total expenditures 1,193.593 1,19-3,593 803,584 390,009 Net change in fund balance (668,904) (668,904) (219,925) 448,979 Fund balance (deficit), beginning of year (1.174,052) (1,174,052) (1,174,052) _ Fund balance (deficit), end of year S ( I,842;956) (1,842.956,) (1,393 977) 448,979 5!) DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OP"THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY I ,ow and Moderate Income Ilnnsing Program - Special Revenue Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Funii Balance - Budget and Acn.lal For the year ended lune 30, 2007 Budgeted Amounts Original Final Revenues: i'roperty tax allocated $ 2,463,592 2,463,592 Interest income 50,000 50,000 ;)the: income 130,000 130,000 Total revenues 2,643,592 2,643,392 Actual 2,708,649 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) 245,057 (32,218) 30,000 ) 2,726,4 31 82,839 laoenditu:es: Personae services 444,666 444,666 62. „313 382,653 Special services 851,939 831,939 .i51,3.53 700,586 ('c+enrrnuuty development — -- 15,846 _(15,8 46) "Total expenditures 1,296,605 1,296,605 279,212 1,067,393 Excess (deficiency) of revenues ovei expenditures 1,346,987 1,34G 987 2,497,219 1,130,232 Other financing sources (uses): Transfers out (825,723) (825.72)(686,783) 138,940 Total other finarcmg sources (uses) (825,723) (825,723) _ (686,783) 138 040 Net ch un a in fund balance 521.2.64 521,264 1,810,436 1.289,172 Fund balance, begi:ntinui of year 5,395,834 5,395,834 5395814 Fund balance, end of vear $ 5,917,098 5,917,098 7,206,2"i0 1,289,172 51 DRAFT ("Phis page intentionally left blank) DRAFT SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 5:5 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMLNTCOMMISSION OFTiffCITY OFNATIONAL CITY Redevelopment Fund - Debt .. etvice Fund Schedule of Revenues, Expendltnres and Changes m Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the year ended June 30, 2007 Revenues' Property tax allocated Interest income Variance with Final Budget Budgeted Amounts Positive C)r, final _ Final Actual (Negative) 9.854,368 9,R54,368 Total revenues 9.854,368 Expenditure,: Curr eut. Special services Debt set -vice: Principal payments Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 10,834,596 123,421 980,228 123,421 9,854,368 10,958,017 1,103,649 9,854,368 9,854,168 83,850 (83,850) 2,000,000 (2,000,000) 2,033,220 (2,033,220) 4,117,070 (4,11'7,070) 6,840,947 (3,013,421) Other financing sources (uses): "Transfers in 686,783 686,783 686,783 Transfers out ('l 640,000) (4,G40,000) (4,640,000) f clai other financing sources Vl:s — .953,2171 (1,953 217) (2 957 217) Net change in fund balance 5,901.151 5,901,151 2,8817,730 (3,013,421) Fund balance, beginning of Fear 2,739,122. 2,739,122 2,739,122 Fund balance, end of year , 8,640,273 8,640,273 5_626,852 (3,013,421) 54 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT C:OMMISS1ON OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL. (.'I"1 Y Redevelopment Fund Capital Projects Fund Schedule of Revenues. Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the year ended June 30, 2007 Revenues: Subventions and grants Interest income Other income "Total IC denueS S Variance with Final Budget Budgetcd Amounts Postfive. Original Final Actual (Negative) 180,000 180,000 3,550,000 3,550,000 3,730,000 3:730,000 60,849 727,813 588,583 7 7,245 60,849 547,813 (2,961,417) (2,352,755) Expenditures: Current: Personnel services 1,656,666 1,656,666 1,410 3,276 253,390 Special services 2,809,334 2,809,3 34 1.,909,283 900,051 Community development 13,155,701 13,155,701 3,971,515 9,184,186 Capital outlay 12,191,268 12,191,268 2,117 12,189,151 Debt service: Literest. and fiscal charges 65,050 (65,050) Total exnenditures 29,812,969 29,812,969 7,351,241 22,461,728 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures (26,087,969) (26,082,969) (5.973,996) 20,108,973 Other financing sources (uses): T!arr.;tIcrs c y 3,704,173 3.704,173 5 022,978 1,318 805 Total oihcr financing sources (uses) 3.704,173 3,704,1 73 5.022978 1,318,805 Net change in fund balance (22.378,796) (22.3 78,796) (951,018) 21,421,778 Fund balance. beginning of year 18,735,837 18,735,837 18,735.837 Fund balance (deficit), end of year S (3,642,959) (3,6,12,959) 11,784,819 21,427,778 55 DRAFT ('This page intentionally left blank) DRAFT Board of Directors Conarnunity Development Commission of the City of National City National City, California REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL. RLPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF "FINANCIAL. STATEMENTS PNRFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNWENT AUDITING ST )NTiARDS We have audited the financial statements of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City ("Commission"), a component unit of the City of National City as of and for the year ended June 30, 2007, and have issued our report thereon dated e We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards <.renerally accepted m the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. internal Control Over Financial Re orting in planning and performing our audit, we considered the Commission's internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Commission's internal control over financial reporting Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the preceding paragraph and would not necessarily identity all deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that Wright be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. However, as discussed below, we identified certain deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to he significant deficiencies and other deficiencies that we consider to be material weaknesses. A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assittned functions, to prevent or detect on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control misstatementsi deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the entity's ability to initiate, authorize, record; process, or report financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the C'ommission's financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not ': prevented or detected by the Commission's internal control. We consider items 07 •01. 07-02. 07-03 and 07- 04 that have been described in the accompanying schedule of findings and recommendations to he significant deficiencies in internal control. In addition, two significant deficiencies that were identified during the audit of the Morgan Towers Enterprise Fund have been reported to the Hoard of Directors of the Commission in a separate letter dated September 21, 2007. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements 57 DRAFT Board of Directors Community Development Commission of the• City of National City National City; California will not be prevented or detected by the Commissions internal control. Our consideration of internal control over financial reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this suction and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might he significant deficiencies and, accordingly. would not necessarily disclose all significant deficiencies that are also considered to he material weakness. However, of the significant deficiencies described above, we consider item 07-01 to be a material weakness. Compliance and Other Matters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Commission's financial statements are free of material misstatements, we performed tests of its compliance. with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and giant agreements, noncompliance with which could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. Such provisions included those provisions of laws and regulations identified in the Guidelines for Compliance Audits of California Redevelopu; nt -t<;enetes, issued by the State Controller and as interpreted in the Suggested Auditing Procedures jor fccoml,lishing Compliance Audits of California Redevelopment .agencies, issued by the Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee of the California Society of Cenificd Public Accounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed instances of noncompliance or other matters which related to the audit of the Morgan Towers Enterprise Fund that are required to be reported under Government Audaing Standards and which have been reported to the Board of Directors of the Commission in a separate letter dated September 21, 2007. In addition, we noted other matter involving compliance with respect to the items tested that is described as follows: The Commission sold property during the year which had been acquired with tax increment money. however, the Commission mission did not comply with the requirements of the Health and Safety Code Section 33433 which states that: "...before any property r.f the agency acquired in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, with tax increment moneys is sold or leased for development pursuant to the redevelopment plan, the sale or lease shall first be approved by the legislative body by resolution after public hearing. Notice of the time and place of the hearing shall be pu✓lih dl i ,. ,..:lvs;'e.1;:': of general circulationthe community :'t. ;: .,. , � ;, inmrrr:nity ai leer. once per week for at least two successive weeks. as specified in Section 6066 of the Government Code, prior to the hearing. Y?u: agency shall make available. for public inspec•tiu,r and copying at a co.si not to exceed the cuss of duplication, a report no liter than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. !Iris r'cport shall coracrir' both of the following: (A) .4 copy of the proposed sale or lease. (R) A summary which describes and specifies all of the following: (t) The cost of the agreement to the agency. including land acquisition casts, clearance costs, relocation costs, the costs of any improvements to be provided by the czgencv, plus the expected interest on any loans or bonds to finance the agreements. 58 DRAFT Board of Directors Community Development Commission of the City of National City National City, California (ii) The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best uses permitted under the plan. (iii) The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the use and with the conditions, covenants, and development costs required by the sale or lease. The purchase price or present value of the lease payments which the lessor will be required to make during the term of the lease. If the .sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest and best use consistent with the redevelopment plan, their the agency shall provide as part of the summary an explanation of the reasons for the difference. iiti) An explanation of why the sale or lease of the property will assist in the elimination of blight, with reference to all supporting facts and materials relied upon in making this explanation. (v) The report shall be made available to the public no later than the time of publication of the first notice of the hearing mandated by this section. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the audit committee, management, and the State Controller and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Irvine, California 59 DRAFT COMMIJNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Schedule of Findings and Recommendations Year ended June 30. 2007 (07-01) Inadequate Internal Controls over Cash and Investments During our review of internal controls over cash and investments, we noted that the Commission's cash and investments (held by both the Commission and its fiscal agent) had not been reconciled to the general ledger on a monthly basis. Sound internal controls dictate that the individual in charge of reconciling the cash and investment portfolio to the general ledger ensure that all cash and investment activities (i.e., purchases, sales, transfers, interest earnings) have been accurately and timely recorded in the general ledger. This procedure should be done soon after month end in order to efficiently detect and resolve any discrepancies or unauthorized transactions that might occur. Recommendation We recommend that the Commission reconcile and record all cash and investment activity to the general ledger on a regular monthly basis. We further recommend that the Commission consider the use of a third party custodian in performing investment transactions for all investments held. The involvement of a third party custodian (separate and distinct from the institution that executes the investment purchase on the Commission's behalf) enhances the internal controls over investments by decreasing the risk of fraud by the counter party, the party that makes the investment purchase. (07-02) Internal Controls over Journal Entries During our review of internal controls over journal entries we noted that computer access controls over the journal entry function within the general ledger computer application does not require two levels of approval for entering journal entries. therefore, it is possible that an accountant could enter a journal entry (which would automatically he recorded in the general ledger) and never prepare a journal entry form and as a result the journal entry might not ever be reviewed by someone independent of the pieparation. Reconimendat ion We recommend that the Finance Director or Financial Services Officer run a general journal report each month, which lists all journal entries made for that month. That individual should review that report to ensure that all significant -entries were approved by someone other than the preparer and should document their review by signing that rcporr. 60 DRAFT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF ('(-IF, CITY OF NATIONAL ('fTY Schedule of Findings and Recommendations (Continued) (07-03.1 inadequate Records on Housing Project Capital Assets The Commission's Morgan and Kimball Towers' housing projects have not maintained adequate detailed records relating to their capital assets. Although adequate detailed records are maintained for current year additions and deletions to capital assets (and related accumulated depreciation), the Commission should maintain detailed records that reconcile to the total ending capital assets and related accumulated depreciation recorded in the general ledger in order to ensure such assets exist and that depreciation is correctly calculated. Recommendation We recommend that the Commission perform au inventory on all capital assets owned by their housing projects and that such records reconcile to the total ending capital assets and related accumulated depreciation recorded in the general ledger: (07_04) Controls over Misstatements Reflected in the Financial Statements An important element of internal control is that management's review of the financial statements be highly effective to detect misstatements reflected in the year end financial statements. While this review currently contributes to the objectives of the financial reporting process, this review does not rise to the level necessary to detect misstatements associated with some of the more complex and technical elements reflected in the financial statements. Currently, the audit firm is relied upon to prevent or detect misstatements in the year end financial statements. Auditing standards require that client systems be effective without reliance upon the audit process. This is because a key role of the auditor is to evaluate the effectiveness of the client's financial reporting control systems. The audit firm cannot be a part of the client's internal control system that is evaluated during the audit process. Paragraph 19 of the Statement on Auditing Standards No. 112 requires that the auditor include in the report of significant control deficiencies any material adjustments detected by the audit process. For the year ended June 30, 2007. material adiustments detected by the audit process were as follows: • Transfer of tax increment revenue from the Redevelopment Capital Projects Fund to the Redevelopment. Debt Service Fund. Recommendation We recommend that management record material adjustments on an annual basis prior to the start of the audit. 61 DRAFT COMMUNITY DI INI.OPiMFN'T COMMISSION OF UHF CITY OF NATIONAL CITY Schedule of Furdin,ts and Recommendations (Continued) (07:041 Controls over Misstatements Reflected in the Financial Statements, (Continued) In addition, in order to enhance management's review of the financial statements; we recommend that additional training be provided to raise the comfort level and effectivcncss of staff with respect to their review of the year end financia! statements. 62 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCIES FINANCIAL TRANSACTIONS REPORT COVER PAGE Community Development Commission Of The City Of National City Fiscal Year. 2007 ID Number: 13983757600 LAWITXo Name (Please Print) 1J -ifci Date Per Health and Safety Code section 33080, this report is due within six months after the end of the fiscal year. The report is to include two (2) copies of the agency's component unit audited financial statements, and the report on the Status and Use of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund (HCD report). To meet the filing requirements, all portions must he received by the California State Controller's Office. To file electronically: 1. Complete all forms as necessary. 2. Transmit the completed output file using a File Transfer Protocol (FTP) program or via diskette. 3. Sign this cover page and mall to either address below with 2 audits and the HCD report. Report will not be considered filed until receipt of this sig ed cover page. Mailing Address: State Controller's Office Division of Accounting and Reporting Local Government Reporting Section P. O. Box 942850 Sacramento, CA 94250 To file a paper report: 1. Complete all forms as necessary. 2. Sign this cover page, and mail complete report to either address below with 2 audits and the HCD report Express Mailing Address: State Controller's Office Division of Accounting and Reporting Local Govemment Reporting Section 3301 C Street, Suite 700 Sacramento, CA 95816 63 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Status of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch C Agency Financial Summary NATIONAL CITY CDC Adjusted Project Agency Net Other Total "Unen- Unen- Unen- Beginning Area Other Total Resources Housing Housing Encum- cumbered cumbered cumbered Balance Receipts Revenue Expenses AvaHable Fund Assets Fund Assets brances Balance Designated Not Dsgntd $0 $2,944,828 $0 $2,086,625 $858,203 $2,604,992 $3,463,195 $750,000 $108,203 $85,237 $22,966 Expenses Debt Service Housing Rehabilitation Other Planning and Administration Costs Total 12006/2007 $790,006 $114,763 $904,031 $277,825 $2,086,625 `The Unencumbered Balance is equal to Net Resources Available minus Encumbrances Note: Print this report In Landscape Orientation (Use the Print Icon Just above, then Properties then Landscape) Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Status of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch C Agency Financial and Program Detail NATIONAL CITY CDC Beginning Balance $0 Adjustment to Beginning Balance $0 Adjusted Beginning Balance $0 Total Tax Increment From PA(s) $2,708,649 Total Receipts from PA(s) $2,944,828 Other Revenues not reported on Schedule A $0 Sum of Beginning Balance and Revenues $2,944,828 Expenditure Item Debt Service Debt Principal Payments Interest Expense Housing Rehabilitation Other Subitem Tax Allocation, Bonds & Notes Subtotal of Debt Service Amount Remark $402,000 $388,006 $790,006 $114,763 Subtotal of Housing Rehabilitation S114,763 $904,031 Subtotal of Other $904,031 Planning and Administration Costs Administration Costs Professional Services $246,479 $31,346 Subtotal of Planning and Administration Costs $277,825 Page 1 of 3 Total Expenditures $2,086,625 Net Resources Available $858,203 12/27/07 LOAN ASSISTANCE TO DEVELOPER - 807333 PAYMENTS RECEIVED ON FTHB LOANS 6,5 Califomia Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Status of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch C Agency Financial and Program Detail NATIONAL CITY CDC Indebtedness For Setasides Deferred $0 Other Housing Fund Assets Category Amount Remark Loan Receivable for Housing Activities $1,807,333 Other $437,659 Value of Land Purchased with Housing Funds $360,000 FTHB LOAN Total Other Housing Fund Assets $2,604,992 Total Fund Equity $3,463,195 2002/2003 $1547842 2003/2004 $1708295 2004/2005 $1920745 2005/2006 $2416429 sum of 4 Previous Years' Tax 'rior Year Ending Unencum Excess Surplus for Increment for 2006/2007 2006/2007 $7593311 $3,501,476 $0 Sum of Current and 3 Previous Years' Tax Increments $8,754,118 Adjusted Balance $108,203 Excess Surplus for next year $0 Net Resources Available $858,203 Unencumbered Designated $85,237 Unencumbered Undeslgnated $22,966 Total Encumbrances $750,000 Unencumbered Balance $108,203 Unencumbered Balance Adjusted for Debt Proceeds $0 Unencumbered Balance Adjusted for Land Sales $0 Excess Surplus Expenditure Plan No Excess Surplus Plan Adoption Date Improvement Activities Benefiting Households [Site Income Level Low Page 2 of 3 Very Low Moderate Total 12/27/07 (�6 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Status of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch C Agency Financial and Program Detail NATIONAL CITY CDC Land Held for Future Development Site Name Num Of Zoning Purchase Estimated Acres Date Start Date Use of the Housing Fund to Assist Mortgagors Income Adjustment Factors Home Non Housing Redevelopment Funds Usage Resource Needs Remark Requirements Completed Hope $ LMIHF Deposits/WIthdrawls Document Document Custodian Custodian Copy Name Date Name Phone Source I Achievements Description Page 3 of 3 12/27/07 6 �1 Protect Area California Redevelopment Agencies -Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Project Area Contributions to Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch A Project Area Summary Report NATIONAL CITY CDC 100% of Tax 20% Set Aside Tax Increment Amount Increment Requirement Allocated Exempted DOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Deferral Tax Incr. Percent Total Deposited to of Tax Repayment Other Deposited to Hsng Fund Incr Dep Deferrals income Housing $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 S0 $0 $2,708,649 20% $0 S236,179 S2,944,828 Agency Totals: $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 S0 $0 $2,708,649 20% $0 $236,179 $2,944,828 Note: Print this report In Landscape Orientation (Use the Print Icon just above, then Properties then Landscape) Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 Agency Address California Redevelopment Agencies- Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Project Area Contributions to Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund Sch A Project Area Financial Information NATIONAL CITY CDC 1243 NATIONAL CITYBLVD NA77ONAL CITY CA 91950 roject Area DOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Type: Inside Protect Area Status: Active Plan Adoption: 1995 Plan Expiration Year: 2025 Gross Tax Calculated Amount Amount Amount Total % Cumulative Increment Deposit Allocated Exempted Deferred Deposited Def. $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 $0 $0 $2,708,649 20% $0 Repayment $0 Category Other Revenue $218,397 Interest Income $17,782 Total Additional Revenue $236,179 Total Housing Fund Deposits for Protect Area $2,944,828 Agency Totals For All Project Areas: Gross Tax Calculated Amount Amount Amount Cumulative Total Increment Deposit Allocated Exempted Deferred Depos ted / Def. $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 $0 $0 $2,708,649 20% $0 Total Additional Revenue from Project Areas $236,179 Total Deferral Repayments. $0 Total Deposit to Housing Fund from Project Areas. $2,944,828 Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 log California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Sch A/B Project Area Program Information NATIONAL CITY CDC Project Area: DOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) FUTURE UNIT CONSTRUCTION Contract Name WILLOW PARTNERS Estimated Execution Completion Date Date Very Low Low Moderate Total 06/15/05 06/30/08 8 72 0 80 Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 70 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Sch D General Project Information NATIONAL CITY CDC Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 '7' SCHEDULE HCD E CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form Is Information Only: Actual Obligation Is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART I [H & SC Section 33413(b)(1)] AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II (El & SC Section 33413(bx2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS 6. New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART Ili TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase In Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 Cahlorma Redevelopment Agencies - Fecal Yom 2005/2007 SModulu E (11/01) ' 1 orals nmy be impacted by rounding Page 1 of 1 12/27/2007 7� SCHEDULE HCD El CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: COPPER HILLS APTS, LP NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART I [H & SC Section 33413(b)(1)J AGENCY DEVELOPED . 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II [H & SC Section 33413(b)(2)J NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS Jew Units 0 L. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 California Redevelopment Agencies -Flex-I Year 200W200/ Schedule E (11/01) *Totals may he inyia t. d by rounding Page 1 of 5 12/27/2007 1_3 SCHEDULE HCD E1 CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: HOUSING REHAB NOTE: This form Is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). . PART I [H & SC Section 33413(b)(1)1 AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART 11 [H & SC Section 33413(b)(2)1 NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS 6. New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 California RedevelopmentAgendes - Fiscal Year 20062007 Schedule F (11/01) 'Totals may be impeded by rounding Page 2 of 5 12/27/2007 1y SCHEDULE HCD E1 CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form Is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: PASEO DEL SOL APTS, LP NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART I [H & SC Section 33413(bx1)] AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline'of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II [H & SC Section 33413(b)(2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART 111 TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) I 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) li 0 C:lifunia Rotlbvelopment Agencies - Fkrnl Year 2006/2007 Sdretlofe E (I MI) 'Totals may be knpndo i by rounding Page 3 of 5 12/27/2007 '1S SCHEDULE HCD El CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: PLAZA MANOR -SUMMER CREST APARTMENTS NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-07 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART I AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II [H & SC Section 33413(bx2)j NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS 6. New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of lndusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 Catitornla Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Schedule E (11/01) •Tnlals mny bo trnturc1ed by rounding Page 4 of 5 12/27/2007 SCHEDULE HCD El CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S !NCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only:. Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Protect AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: PROJECT AREA HOUSING PRODUCTION NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART I pi & SC Section 33413(b)(1)] AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART 11 [H & SC Section 33413(bx2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) I 0 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Schedule L (11/01) 'totals nay be npacted by rounding Page 5 of 5 12/27/2007 'Z')A Repor'ing Sys'.crr U?..a 1 ,,.f" T Confirmation of Redevelopment Agency On -Line Filing_of Annual HCD Report 'I'o: State Controller Division of Accounting and Reporting Local Government Reporting Section P.O.Box. 942850 Sacramento, CA 9.3250 This notice is automatically generated by HCD's On -Line Reporting System. The purpose is to inform and verify to the SCO that the redevelopment agency electronically filed the annual HCD report and HCD, by this notice, electronically received the annual HCD report. Below identifies the reporting redevelopment agency, authorized person who filed the report, and the elate and time HCD received the agency's annual report: Redevelopment. Agency: PIATIONAL CITY CDC Agency Administrator: Jeanette Ladrido Date: 12/27/2007 Time: fly 5.1_pm Note to Redevelopment Agency.; Send this notice and a copyACJig_Agency's independent auditor's report and financial statement to the SCO at the above address. it is nor necessary to submit a paper copy of HCD's reporting schedules to either the SCO or HCD. https://ssw2.hcd.ca.gov/RDA/showI .ockLettcr. jsp 12/27/2007 California Redevelop. .tAgencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Status of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch C Agency Financial Summary NATIONAL CITY CDC Adjusted Protect Agency Net Other Total * Unen- Unen- Unen- Beginning Area Other Total Resources Housing Housing Encum- cumbered cumbered cumbered Balance Receipts Revenue Expenses Available Fund Assets Fund Assets brances Balance Designated Not Dsgntd $0 $2,944,828 $0 $2,086,625 $858,203 $2,604,992 $3,463,195 $750,000 $108,203 $85,237 $22,966 Expenses Debt Service 2006/20071 $790,006 Housing Rehabilitation $114,763 Other $904,031 Planning and Administration Costs $277,825 Total $2,086,625 *The Unencumbered Balance is equal to Net Resources Available minus Encumbrances Note: Print this report in Landscape Orientation (Use the Print Icon just above, then Properties then Landscape) Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2CC5/2CC7 Status of Low and Moderate lncoma Housing Fu, I:ls Sch C Agency Financial and Program Detail NATIONAL CITY CDC Beginning Bala r.ce $0 Adjustment to Beginning Bak' ce $0 Adjusted Beginring Balance $0 Total Tax Increment From PA(s; $2,708,649 Total Receipts from PA (s) $2,944,828 Other Revenues not reported on Schedu!_, .4 $0 Sum of Beginning Balance and Revers ,,es $2,944,828 Expenditure Item Debt Service Debt Principal Payments Interest Expense Housing Rehabilitation Other Subitem Tax Allocation, Bonds & Notes Subtotal of Debt Service Amount Remark S402,000 1i3B8,006 S790,006 S114,763 Subtotal of Housing Rehabilitation $114,763 $904,031 LOAN ASSISTANCE TO DEVELOPER - 807333 PAYMENTS RECEIVED ON FTHB LOANS Subtotal of Other 3 904,031 Planning and Administration Costs Administration Costs Professional Services Subtotal of Planning and Administration Costs Page 1 of 3 Total Expenditures $246,479 $31,346 1;277,825 $2,086,625 Net Resources Available : 858,203 1>/27/07 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Status of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch C Agency Financial and Program Detail NATIONAL CITY CDC Indebtedness For Setasides Deferred $0 Other Housing Fund Assets Category Amount Loan Receivable for Housing Activities $1,807,333 Other $437,659 Value of Land Purchased with Housing Funds $360, 000 2002/2003 $1547842 2003/2004 $1708295 2004/2005 $1920745 2005/2006 $2416429 Remark FTHB LOAN Total Other Housing Fund Assets $2,604,992 Total Fund Equity $3,463,195 sum of 4 Previous Years' Tax 'rlor Year Ending Unencum Excess Surplus for Increment for 2006/2007 2006/2007 $7593311 $3,501,476 $0 Sum of Current and 3 Previous Years' Tax Increments $8,754,118 Adjusted Balance $108,203 Excess Surplus for next year $0 Net Resources Available $858,203 Unencumbered Designated $85,237 Unencumbered Undesignated $22,966 Total Encumbrances $750,000 Unencumbered Balance $108,203 Unencumbered Balance Adjusted for Debt Proceeds $0 Unencumbered Balance Adjusted for Land Sales $0 Excess Surplus Expenditure Plan No Excess Surplus Plan Adoption Date Site Improvement Activities Benefiting Households Income Level Low Page 2 of 3 Very Low 21 Moderate Total 12/27/07 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2CCG/2007 Status of Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch C Agency Financial and Program Detail NATIONAL CITY CDC. Land Held for Future Development Site Name Num Of Zoning Purchase Estimated Acres Date Start Date Use of the Housing Fund to Assist Mortgagors Income Adjustment Factors Home Non Housing Redevelopment Funds Usage Resource Needs Requirements Completed Hope Remark LMIHF Deposits/Withdrawls Document Document Custodian Custodian Copy Name Date Name Phone Source Achievements Description Page 3 of 3 12/27/07 California Redevelopment Age. s-Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Protect Area Contributions to Low and Moderate Income Housing Funds Sch A Project Area Summary Report NATIONAL CITY CDC Tax Incr. Project Area 100% of Tax 20% Set Aside Tax Increment Amount Deferral Deposited to Increment Requirement Allocated Exempted Hsng Fund DOWNTOWN PROJECT $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 $0 $0 $2,708,649 (NCDRP) Agency Totals: Percent of Tax Repayment Other lncr Dep Deferrals Income Total Deposited to Housing 20% $0 $236,179 $2,944,828 $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 $0 $0 $2,708,649 20%• $0 $236,179 Note: Print this report in Landscape Orientation (Use the Print Icon just above, then Properties then Landscape) Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 $2,944,828 California Redevelopment Agencies- Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Project Area Contributions to Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund Sch A Project Area Financial Information Agency NATIONAL CITY CDC Address 1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD NATIONAL CITY CA 91950 (Project Area DOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Type: Inside Project Area Status: Active Plan Adoption: 1995 Plan Expiration Year: 2025 Gross Tax Calculated Amount Amount Amount Total % Cumulative Increment Deposit Allocated Exempted Deferred Deposited Def. $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 $0 $0 $2,708,649 20% $0 Repayment $0 Category Other Revenue $218,397 Interest Income $17,782 Total Additional Revenue $236,179 Total Housing Fund Deposits for Protect Area $2,944,828 Agency Totals For All Project Areas: Gross Tax Calculated Amount Amount Amount Total / Cumulative Increment Deposit Allocated Exempted Deferred Deposited Def. $13,543,245 $2,708,649 $2,708,649 $0 $0 $2,708,649 20% $0 Total Additional Revenue from Project Areas $236,179 Total Deferral Repayments. $0 Total Deposit to Housing Fund from Project Areas. $2,944,828 Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Sch AB Project Area Program Information NATIONAL CITY CDC roject Area: DOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) 'JTURE UNIT CONSTRUCTION-- -- -- Estimated Execution Completion Contract Name Date Date Very Low Low Moderate Total WILLOW PARTNERS 06/15/05 06/30/08 8 72 0 80 Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 gS California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2006/2007 Sch D General Project Information NATIONAL CITY CDC Page 1 of 1 12/27/07 SCHEDULE HCD E CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PARTI tH & SC Section 33413(b)(1)] AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inctusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II tH & SC Section 33413(bx2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS 6. New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 . Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART 111 TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 Cali/wedCali/wed Redevelopment Agencies - Herd Year 20U(i/YW / Senndule F (11/01) • I otals may be Impeded by rounding Page 1 of 1 12/27/2007 SCHEDULE HCD E1 CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCL USIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: COPPER HILLS APTS, LP NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PARTI [H & SC Section 33413(b)(1)] AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II [H & SC Section 33413(b)(2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS 6. New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) I 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) Ij 0 California Rednvek,pmeld Agana.- Fiscal Year 2000R110/ Schedule E (11/01) 'Totals 'bey be impacted by rouricing Page 1 of 5 12/27/2007 • SCHEDULE HCD E1 CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCURP) Project: HOUSING REHAB NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). . PARTI fi i & SC Section 33413(b)(1)] AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART 11 [H & SC Section 33413(b)(2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 California Reduvebprnent Agencies - Fiscal Year SUleduIe L (11/01) 'Tot l may be vnpaded by rounding 2006/200f Page 2 of 5 12/27/2007 SCHEDULE HCD E1 CALCULATION OP INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation Is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: PASEO DEL SOL APTS, LP NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART I [H & SC Section 33413(bx1)) AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued.this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II [H & SC Section 33413(bx2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS 6. New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 California Ruduvok,pmenl Agon6ue - Your 2006'2007 Schedule C (11/01) •1 owls may be npacled by rounding Page 3 of 5 12/27/2007 SCHEDULE HCD El - CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form Is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: PLAZA MANOR -SUMMER CREST APARTMENTS NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART 1 [H & SC Section 33413(b)(1)1 AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add Tine 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II [11 & SC Section 33413(b)(2)] NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS . New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART III TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 ealdrrna Redevelopment Avenues. fiscal Year 2006/T007 Schedule t (11l01) 'Tntnls may be impacted by rounding Page 4 of 5 12/27/2007 SCHEDULE HCD El CALCULATION OF INCREASE IN AGENCY'S INCLUSIONARY OBLIGATION FOR ACTIVITIES (This Form is Information Only: Actual Obligation is based on Implementation Plan) Report Year: 2006/2007 Agency: NATIONAL CITY CDC Project AreaDOWNTOWN PROJECT (NCDRP) Project: PROJECT AREA HOUSING PRODUCTION NOTE: This form is a summary of the totals of all new construction or substantial rehabilitation units from forms HCD-D7 which are developed in a project area by any entity (agency or non - agency). PART 1 (H & SC Section 33413(bX1)] AGENCY DEVELOPED 1. New Units 0 2. Substantially Rehabilitated Units 0 3. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add line 1 & 2) 0 4. Subtotal of lnclusionary Obligation Accrued this Year for Units (line 3 x 30%) 0 5. Subtotal of Inclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Very -Low Income Units (line 4 x 50%) 0 PART II [H & SC Section 33413(bX2)1 NON -AGENCY DEVELOPED UNITS 6. New Units 0 7. Substantially Rehabilitated Units . 0 8. Subtotal - Baseline of Units (add lines 6 & 7) 0 9. Subtotal of lnclusionary Obligation Accrued this year for Units (line 8 x 15%) 0 10. Subtotal of lnclusionary Obligation Accrued thls year for Very Low Income Units (line 9 x 40%) 0 PART 11I . TOTALS 11. Total Increase in Inclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 4 & 9) 0 12. Total Increase in Very Low Income Units lnclusionary Obligations During This Fiscal Year (add line 5 & 10) 0 California Redevelopment Ayeneies- Fiscal Year 2006200/ Schedule E (11/01) 'TWals may be impacted by rounding Page 5 of 5 12/27/2007 9 STATEMENT OF INDEk .DNESS-CONSOLIDATED FILED FOR THE 2007-2008 TAX YEAR Name of Redevelopment Agency: Community Development Commission of the City of National City Name of Project Area: National City Redevelopment Project Balances Carried Forward From: Line Current Total Outstanding Debt Principal/Interest Due During Tax Year Fiscal Period —Totals (From Form A, Page 1 Totals) (1) $89,618,879 $11,234,404 Post Fiscal Period — Totals (From Form B, Page 1 Totals) (2) $0 $0 Grand Totals (3) $89,618,879 $11,234,404 Available Revenues From Calculation of Available Revenues, Line 7 (4) $13,863,927 it Net 1Reauirement (5) $75,754,952 Certification of Chief Financial Officer: Pursuant to Section 33675(b) of the Health and Safety Code, I hereby certify that the above is a true and accurate Statement of Indebtedness for the above named agency. Jeanette Ladrido Finance Director Na 'e Title 10/17/2007 Sig r ure Date revised 10/17/2007 STATEMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS -FISCAL YEAR INDEBTEDNESS FILED FOR THE 2006-2007 TAX YEAR Name of Redevelopment Agency: Community Development Commission of the City of National City National City Revelopment Project Name of Project Area: For Indebtedness Entered into as of June 30, 2007 Form A Page I of 2 Data Ctirrent Ori3inal Debt Identification Date Principal Term Interest Rate Total Interest Total Outstanding Debt Principal/Interest Due During Tax Year (A) Southwestern Community College 8/6/1991 $2.000,000 20 Years none none SO $261,355 (B) SD County Office of Education 6/12/1991 $2,100,000 20 Years none none SO $286,866 City of National City Capital (C) Improvement Projects 6/18/1991 $6,400,000 20 Years none none S1,600,000 $1,298:987 (D) County of San Diego 5/12/1992 $14,621,867 14 Years none none S2,432,062 8904,130 (E) Low & Moderate 20% Set Aside 6/30/2006 not applicable Annual none none $15,150,991 $2,708,649 (F) Agency Administration 6/30/2006 not applicable Annual none none $0 $1,167,896 . (G) 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds 6/17/2004 $5,805,000 28 Years varies $4:683.969 $9,385,363 $489,063 (H) 2005 Tax Allocation Bonds 1/25/2005 $37,780,000 27 Years varies $16,262,210 847.100,458 $3,215,110 (I) Motivational Systems Inc 11/3/2004 not applicable Annual none none $0 $0 Sub Total, This Page i. i 575,668,874 $10,332,056 $13,950,005 $902,348 Tota:s Foruarc From All Other Pages $89.618,879 $11,234,404 Totals, Distal Year Indebtedness Purpose of indebtedness: (A) Local taxing authority passthrough agreement Local taxing authority passthrough agreement (C) Local taxing authority passthrough agreement ;D) Local taxing authority passthrough agreement (E) Legal Mandate (Section 33334.2 of Health & Safety Code) (F) Agency Administration (G) Tax Allocation Bond - 2004 (H) Tax Allocation Bond - 2005 (I) DDA STATEMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS -FISCAL YEAR INDEBTEDNESS FILED FOR THE i-2007 TAX YEAR Name of Redevelopment Agency: Community Development Commission of the City of National City Name of Project Area: National City Revelopment Project For Indebtedness Entered into as of June 30, 2007 Form A . :2of2 Debt Identification Original Data Current Date Principal Term Interest Rate Total Interest Total Outstanding Debt Principal/Interest Due During Tax Year (A) Marina Gateway Hotel 2/5/2005 not applicable annual none none $1.438,922 $12,880 (B) ACE Metals (MRW) 5/18/2004 not applicable annual none none $15,508 - $460,492 (C) Harrison Avenue Condo and MSI 3/23/2004 not aplicable annual none none $611,667 $45,105 (D) Pacific Steel 6/14/2005 not applicable annual none none $8,901,120 $20,708 (E) Arts Center 6/30/2004 not applicable annual none none $1,374,235 $0 (F) National Distribution Center 7/1/2006 not applicable annual none none $0 $121,716 (G) The Cove @ San Diego Bay 7/19/2005 not applicable annuai none none 51,608,553 $241.447 (H) Total This Page $13,950,005 $902,348 Purpose of Indebtedness: (A) DDA (B) ENA (C) DDA (D) DDA (2) Renovation of previous NC Library to Arts Center (F) Economic Development - Stadium (G) DDA (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) RECONCILIATION STATEMENT -CHANGES IN INDEBTEDNESS Name of Agency Community Development Commission of the City of National City Name of Project Area National City Redevelopment Proiect Tax Year: Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2007 Reconciliation Dates: From July 1, 2006 To June 30, 2007 Page ► of 2 A a C D E F Debt Identification: Outstanding Debt All Beginning Indebtedness Adjustments Amounts Paid Against indebtedness, from: Remaining Balance (A+B-C-D-E) SOI, page and line: Brief Description Increases (Attach ExplanationL Decreases (Attach Explanation) Prior Yr: Current Yr. Tax Increment Other Funds Pg 1 Line A Pg 1 Line A Sou:hweste.-n Community College $259,477. SI,878 SO $261,355 $0 S0 Pg 1 Lire B Pg 1 Line B SD County Office of Education $185,327 S 101,539 S0 $286,866 $0 S0 Pg 1 Line C Pg 1 Line C City of National City Capital Improvement Projects $1,920,000 $978,987 $0 S1,298,987 $0 $1,600,000 Pg 1 Lire D Pg 1 Line D County of San Diego 53,336,192 So $0 $904,130 SO $2,432,062 Pg I Line E Pg 1 Line E Low & Moderate 20% Set Aside S 17,745,815 $113,825 $0 $2,708,649 $0 $15,150,991 Pg 1 Line F Pg 1 Line F Agency Administration $2,227,896 S1,167,987 (S2,227,987) S1,167,896 $0 $0 Pg 2 Line P Pg 2 Line G The Cove a San Diego Bay $1,850,000 S0 $0 $0 $241,447 $1,608,553 TOTAL — THIS PAGE $27,524,707 $2,364,216 (S2,227,987) $6,627,883 $241,447 S20,791,606 TOTALS FORWARD $71,386,396 S1,805,951 S0 S4,365.074 SO 568,827,273 GRAND TOTALS 598,911,103 54,170,167 (52,227,987) S10,992,957 5241,447 589,618,879• f NOTE: This form is to reconcile the previous Statement of Indebtedness to the current one being filed. However, since the reconciliation period is limited by law to a July 1 — June 30 (fiscal year period, only those items included on the SOI Form A is to be included on this document. To assist in following each item of indebtedness from one SOI to the next, use page and line number references from each SOI that the item of indebtedness is listed on. If the indebtedness is new to this fiscal year, enter "new" in the "Prior Yr." page and line columns. Column F must equal the current SOI, Form A Total Outstanding Debt column. RECONCILIATION STATEMEN ,rIANGES IN INDEBTEDNESS Name of Agency Community Development Commission of the City of National City Name of Project Area National City Redevelopment Project Tax Year: Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2007 Reconciliation Dates: From July 1, 2006 To June 30, 2007 of 2 A B C D E F Debt Identification: Outstanding Debt All Beginning Indebtedness Adjustments Amounts Paid Against indebtedness, from: Remaining Balance (A+B-C-D-E) SOI, page and line: Brief Description Increases (Attach Explanation) Decreases (Attach Explanation) Prior Yr. Current Yr. Tax Increment Other Funds Pg I Line G Pg 1 Line G 2004 Tax Allocation Bonds $9,874,426 $0 SO S489,063 $0 $9,385,363 Pg I Lice 11 Pg 1 Line H 2O05 Tax Ailocatior. Bonds S50,315,568 S0 $0 $3,215,110 $0 $47,100,458 Pg 1 Line 1 Pg 1 Line 1 Harrison Avenue Condo and Motivational Systems Inc 5656,7 72 $0 SO $45,105 S0 $611,667 Pg 2 Line A Pg 2 L:ne A Marina Gateway Hotel 31,451,802 $0 $0 S12,880 So $1,438,922 Pg 2 Line 3 Pg 2 Line 13 ACE Metals (MRW) S166,000 $310,000 $0 $460,492 $0 $15,508 Pg 2 Line D Pg 2 L:re C Pacific Steel $8,921,828 $0 $0 $20,708 SO $8,901,120 None Pg 2 Line D Arts Center $0 $1,374,235 $0 SO SO $1,374,235 New Pg 2 Line E National Distribution Center $0 $121,716 $0 $121, 716 SO SO TOTAL — THIS PAGE $71,386,396 $1,805,951 $0 $4,365,074 So $68,827,273 NOTE: This form is to reconcile the previous Statement of Indebtedness to the current one being filed. However, since the reconciliation period is limited by law to a July 1 — June 30 fiscal year period, only those items included on the SOI Form A is to be included on this document. To assist in following each item of indebtedness from one SOI to the next, use page and line number references from each SOI that the item of indebtedness is listed on. If the indebtedness is new to this fiscal year, enter "new" in the "Prior Yr." page and line columns. Column F must equal the current SOI, Form A Total Outstanding Debt column. Footnotes to Reconciliation Statement AGENCY NAME Community Development Commission of the City of National City PROJECT AREA National City Redevelopment Project Tax Year: Fiscal Year Beginning July 1. 2007 Reconciliation Dates: From July I, 2006 To June 30. 2007 Southwestern Community College Increases: To adjust beginning balance to the amount paid during FY 06/07 S1,878 SD County Office of Education Increases: To adjust beginning balance to the amount paid during FY 06/07 $101.539 City of National City Increases: Capital Improvement Projects To include the 9th St Fountain Plaza Project Expenditures $978,987 Low and Moderate 20% Set Aside Decreases: To adjust the ending set aside balance $113,825 Aeencv Administration Increases: 2006-07 actual amount Decreases: to remove the 2006-07 oudgeted amount S1,167,987 ($2,227,987) ACE Metals (MRW) Increases: To add projected budget per 2006-07 budget $310,000 Arts Center Increases: To include expenditures for the Arts Center Project - funding source is TAB S1.374,235 National Distribution Center Increases: To include expenditures for the National D`stribution Center Project $121,716 CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE REVENUES AGENCY NAME Community Development Commission of the City of National City PROJECT AREA National City Redevelopment Project TAX YF,AR Fiscal Year Beginning July 1, 2007 RECONCILIATION DATES: .IIJI.Y 1, 2006 TO JLJNE 30, 2007 1. Beginning Balance, Available Revenues $10,182,028 (per 2006-07 Statement of Indebtedness) 2. Tax Increment Received — Gross: $13,543,246 All Tax Increment Revenues, to include any Tax Increment passed through to other local taxing agencies. 3. All other Available Revenues Received $1;131,610 4. Revenues from any other source, included in Column E of the Reconciliation Statement, but not included in (1-3) $241,447 5. Sum of Lines 1 through 4 $25,098,331 6. Total amounts paid,against indebtedness in previous year. (D + E on Reconciliation Statement) 7. Available Revenues, End of Year (5 - 6) FORWARD THIS AMOUNT TO STATEMENT OF INDEBTEDNESS, COVER PAGE, LINE 4 NOTES $11,234,404 $13,863,927 Tax Increment Revenues: The only amount(s) to be excluded as Tax Increment Revenues are any amounts passed through to other local taxing agencies pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 33676. Tax Increment Revenue set -aside in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund will be washed in the above calculation, and therefore omitted from Available Revenues at year end. Item 4. above: This represents any payments from any source other than Tax increment OR available revenues. For instance, an agency funds a project with a bond issue. The previous SOI included a Disposition Development Agreement (DDA) which was fully satisfied with these bond proceeds. The DDA would be shown on the Reconciliation Statement as fully repaid under the other" column (Col E), but with funds that were neither Tax Increment, nor "Available Revenues" as defined. The amounts used to satisfy this DDA would be included on line 4 above in order to accurately determine ending "Available Revenues." Rev. 7/6/2000 °�9 ESTIMATED HOUSING SET -ASIDE To compute Housing Estimates: debt Debt 1 Debt 2 Debt 3 Sub -Total (Hard Debt) Less: Available Revenues Net Requirement for Debt Housing Set -aside Total Requirement Needed To compute the housing estimate: 20% of Total Requirement Total debt 74,467,889 74,467,889 (13,863,927) 60,603,962 = ????2? _ 75,754,953 = 15,150,991 80% 20% 100% of Tax Increment Housing Set -Aside Total Tax Increment To check: Tax Increment tc receve • less: 20% housing set aside Available fcr Debt 75.754,953 15,150,991 60,603, 962 ITEM #14 1/8/08 Verbal Update on Branding and Marketing Efforts (Economic Development) ITEM #15 1/8/08 Verbal Update on Redevelopment Projects (Community Development)