Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008 07-15 CC CDC AGENDA PKTr Agenda Of Regular Meeting - National City City Council / Community Development Commission of the City of National City Council Chambers Civic Center 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California Regular Meeting - Tuesday — July 15, 2008 — 6:00 P.M. .,.t, *......* Open '1'o 'the Public Please complete a request to speak form prior to the commencement of Cite meeting and submit it to the City Clerk. It is the intention of your City Council and Community Development Commission (CDC) to he receptive to your concerns in this community. Your participation in local government will assure a responsible and efficient City of National City. We invite you to bring to the attention of the City Manager/Executive Director any matter that you desire the City Council or Community Development Commission Tidard to consider. We thank you for your presence and wish you to know that we appreciate your involvement. R()1,1, ('AI,i, Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by Mayor Ron Morrison Public Oral Communications (Three -Minute time Limit) NOTE: Pursuant to state law, items requiring Council or Community Development Commission action must be brought hack on a subsequent Council or Community Development Conumssron Agenda unless they are of a demonstrated emergency of urgent natuie. Upon request, this agenda can he made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a di\ability in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (619) 336-422t; to request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24-hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. .Spanish audio interpretation is provided during Council and Community Development Commission Meetings. Audio headphones are available in the lobby at the beginning of the meetings. Audio interpretacion en espanol se proporciona durante sesiones del Consejo Municipal. Los audiofonos estan disponibles en el pasillo al principio de la junta. Council Requests That All CeII Phones And Pagers Be Turned Off During City Council Meetings OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDAS AND MINUTES MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH OUR WEBSiTE AT www.cL.national-city.ca.us CITY COUNCIUCOMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/15/08- Page 2 CITY COUNCIL PRESENTATION 1. Employee of the Month of July, 2008 — Corporal Daniel Nagle (Police Dept.) 2. Introducing Miss National City and her Court. 3. Comprehensive Transportation Plan Update. (Engineering) CONSENT CALENDAR Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public. 4. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council/Community Development Commission Meeting of July 1, 2008. (City Clerk) 5. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the residence at 333 E. 41h Street. (TSC Item No. 2008- 18) (Engineering) 6. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an Agreement with Kleinfelder, Inc. in the amount of $51,400 (not to exceed) to provide materials testing services for the National City Street Resurfacing Project. (Funding is available through Proposition "A" Funds-TransNet). (Engineering) 7. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City waiving the bid process and authorizing a sole source purchase for park furnishings such as benches, standard and ADA-compliant picnic tables, and waste receptacles made from recycled materials from Wishbone Industries LTD in the amount of $346,201.00 as outlined in the presentation to the City of National City City Council on January 22, 2008. (Funded through General Funds). (Engineering) CITY COUNCIL/COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/15/08- Page 3 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting a proposal from CityGate Associates, LLC to conduct a Master Plan Study for the Fire Department in the amount of $39,500.00. (Purchasing/Fire) Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting the lowest, responsive, responsible bid from TW Mobile Engineering Technologies, Inc. for the outfitting (build-up) of ten police cars and one animal control truck for a total of $148,357.71. (Purchasing) 10. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City confirming and approving the Diagram and Assessment Engineers Report and providing for the levy of the Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 — (Mile of Cars). (Redevelopment Division) 11. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City confirming and approving the Diagram and Assessment Engineer's Report and providing for the levy of the Annual Assessment in the Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District (Morgan Square Community Benefit District). (Redevelopment Division) 12. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving an Addendum to Agreement between the City of National City and Constellation Property Group regarding $70,000 relocation costs for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local No. 29 offices. (Redevelopment Division) 13. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing acceptance of grant award of $71,594.00 from the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) for training and enforcement of laws pertaining to alcohol compliance, including decoy operations and authorizing the Chief of Police to sign all grant related documents concerning the ABC Grant. (Police) CITY COUNCILJCOMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/15/08- Page 4 CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 14. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the 30- day review and public comment of the National City Police Department's grant application toward the purchase of rifles, communications monitors, digital cameras, and digital recorders for the Police Department utilizing $16,459 from the 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. (Police) 15. WARRANT REGISTER # 51 (Finance) Warrant Register #51 for the period of 06/11/08 through 06/17/08 in the amount of $1,873,121.18. (Finance) 16. WARRANT REGISTER # 52 (Finance) Warrant Register #52 for the period of 06/18/08 through 06/24/08 in the amount of $458,651.19. (Finance) PUBLIC HEARINGS 17. Continued Public Hearing - General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Single -Family Small Lot (RS-2) to Limited Commercial (CL) and a Proposed Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact at 2701-2703 and 2729 East 18th Street. (Applicant: Productive Real Estate, LLC) (Case File No. 2007-60 GP, ZC, IS). (Planning) 18. Continued Public Hearing - Adoption of the City of National City's 2008 User Fee Schedule. (City Manager) **Continued from Council Meeting 7-1- 08" (Refer to Item #22) 19. Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit and Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect for a 16-unit apartment project at 2701-2703, and 2729 East 18th Street. (Applicant: Productive Real Estate, LLC) (Case File No. 2007-60 CUP, IS) (Planning) CITY COUNCIUCOMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/15/08- Page 5 PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.) 20. Public Hearing to consider adoption of the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program of Projects (RTIP) for National City Fiscal Years 2009 through 2013. (Engineering) "Refer to Item #21** NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS 21. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program of Projects (RTIP) for National City for Fiscal Years 2009-2013. (Engineering) **Refer to Item #20** 22. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting the City of National City's 2008 User Fee Schedule for User Fees within the City. (City Manager) "Refer to Item #18** NEW BUSINESS 23. Report: Submission of Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 - (Mile of Cars) Annual Budget, List of Board of Directors, 2007 and 2008 Profit and Loss Statements, and the 2007 Independent Auditor's Report. (Redevelopment Division) 24. Report: Submission of Fiscal year 2007-2008 Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District (Morgan Square Community Benefit District) Annual Budget, List of Board of Directors, 2007 and 2008 Profit and Loss Statements, and the 2007 Independent Auditor's Report (Redevelopment Division) 25. City Council's designation of League of California Cities Voting Delegate and Alternate. (City Manager) CITY COUNCIL/COMMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA 7/15/08- Page 6 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR 26. Warrant Register for the period of 06/13/08 through 06/26/08 in the amount of $474,359.35. (Community Development Commission/Finance) 27. Resolution of the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (CDC) approving an Amendment to the rules governing participation and preferences by property owners and business occupants in the National City Redevelopment Project. (Redevelopment) STAFF REPORTS 28. Graffiti Services Program Update. (Neighborhood Services) 29. Staffing Update. (Police) MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ADJOURNMENT Next Regular City Council and Community Development Commission Meeting - Tuesday — August 5, 2008 - 5:00 p.m. — Council Chamber - National City. **Due to "National Night Out" beginning at 6:00 pm on August 5, 2008, this regular adjourned Council meeting will begin at 5:00 p.m. " TAPE RECORDINGS OF CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEE:I IN(;S ARE; AVAILABLE FOR SALE IN '1'I11' CITY CLERK'S OFFICE City of National City Human Resources Department 140 East 12m Street, Suite B National City, California 91950-3312 Phone No. (619) 336-4300 Fax No. (619) 336-4303 MEMORANDUM July I. 2008 TO FROM SUBJECT Chris Zapata, ( :it y,M1lanager Stacey Stcyensoi F:M P I.O Y F: F: an Resources Director HE NIONT11 PROGRAM ITEM #1 7(15/08 The Employee of the Month Program communicates the City's appreciation for outstanding performance In doing so, it recognizes employees who maintain high standards of personal conduct and make significant contributions to the workplace and community The employee to be recognized in July 2008 is Corporal Daniel Nagle By copy of this memo, the employee is invited to attend the Council meeting on Tuesday. July 15, 2008 to be recognized for his achievement and service. Attachment cc Daniel Nagle Chief Adolfo Gonzales Lieutenant Craig Boegler Councilmember Natividad Dionisia Trejo - Mayor/Council Office Human Resources - Office File SS.Igr Performance Recognition Program (2) Rcr)ricd Paper PERFORMANCE RECOGNITION AWARD NOMINATION On May 20, 2007, a man was shot to death in the crowded parking lot of a local McDonald's Restaurant. Homicide Detective Dan Nagle was assigned the case. Over the next five months, Detective Nagle selflessly worked the case with dogged persistence. Detective Nagle and his team located and interviewed numerous reluctant witnesses and persons of interest, coordinated the processing of critical crime evidence, and provided constant updates to prosecutors. Detective Nagle's journeyman investigative skills and team leadership resulted in over twenty search warrants being served for incriminating cell phone records, four search warrants being served at residences, and the arrest of seventeen persons - including the arrest of the primary suspect responsible for the brutal murder. Recently, the murder suspect appeared in court. Detective Nagle coordinated an armed police protection detail to safeguard the lives of the witnesses who testified against the suspect. Detective Nagle provided expert testimony. The suspect was held for trial, which is scheduled for later this year. Detective Nagle's work ethic, investigative skills, and leadership are responsible for the successful outcome of this complicated murder investigation. When the leads slowed and the case became cold, Detective Nagle and his team of professionals continued working relentlessly inside and outside the box to bring those responsible for this horrendous murder to justice. ITEM #2 7/15/08 INTRODUCING MISS NATIONAL CITY AND HER COURT ITEM #3 7/15/08 COMPREHENSIVE TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE - ENGINEERING- ITEM #4 7-15-08 APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY COUNCIL/COMMUITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 1, 2008 - CITY CLERK - City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .AEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 5 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the City Engineer to approve installation of a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the residence at 333 E. 4th Street (TSC Item No. 2008-18) PREPARED BY Stephen Manganiello DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4382 EXPLANATION Please see attached. Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved Br Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMM NDATION t the Reso ARD/C. 0 At their meeting on June 11, 2008 the Traffic Safety Committee approved the staff recommendation to install a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the residence at 333 E. 41° Street. ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Explanation 2. Staff Report to the Traffic Safety Committee (June 11, 2008) A-200 (Rev. 7a3) Explanation Mr. Alberto Morales requested a handicap parking space in front of his house located at 333 E. 4'h Street. Staff visited the site and observed that available parking is limited in the immediate vicinity of Mr. Morales' house. Staff also verified that Mr. Morales does not have off-street parking available on his property. There are no handicap parking spaces in the immediate vicinity of his residence. The City Council has adopted a policy, which is used to evaluate requests for handicap parking spaces. The City Council Policy requirements for "Special Hardship" cases are as follows: 1. Applicant (or guardian) must be in possession of valid license plates for "disabled persons" or disabled veterans". This condition is met. 2. The proposed disabled parking space must be in front of the applicant's (or guardian's) place of residence. This condition is met. 3. The residence must not have useable off-street parking available or an off-street space available that may be converted into disabled parking. This condition is met. Since all three conditions of the City Council's Disabled Persons Parking Policy are met for this "Special Hardship" case, staff recommends installing a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the residence at 333 E. 4`" Street. The blue curb handicap parking space with sign will be installed by the City Public Works Department. TSC 2008-18 RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO APPROVE INSTALLATION OF A BLUE CURB HANDICAP PARKING SPACE WITH SIGN IN FRONT OF THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 333 EAST 4TH STREET (A. MORALES, TSC ITEM NO. 2008-18) WHEREAS, Mr. Alberto Morales, who is disabled, has requested that a blue curb handicap parking space be installed in front of his home located at 333 East 4th Street; and WHEREAS, at its meeting on June 11, 2008, the Traffic Safety Committee approved the installation of a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that the City Engineer is authorized to establish a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the property located at 333 East 4th Street. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008 Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney NATIONAL CITY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AGENDA REPORT FOR JUNE 11, 2008 ITEM TITLE: ITEM NO. 2008-18. REQUEST FOR INSTALLATION OF A BLUE CURB HANDICAP PARKING SPACE 1N FRONT OF 333 E. 4"' STREET (BY: A. MORALES) PREPARED BY: Adam Larrda, Engineering Department DISCUSSION: Mr. Alberto Morales is requesting the installation of a handicap pat king space in front of his house located at 333 E 4"' Street. Mr. Morales stated that he has medical problems and can not walk long distances. He has a valid "Disabled Person Parking Placard. Staff visited the site and observed that there are no off-street parking spaces for him to park his vehicle There are no handicap parking spaces on E. 4th Street in the immediate vicinity of his house The City Council has adopted a policy, which is used to evaluate requests for handicap parking spaces The City Council Policy requirements for "Special Hardship" cases are as follows 1 Applicant (or guardian) must be in possession of valid license plates for "disabled persons" of disabled veterans". This condition is reel. 2. The proposed disabled parking space must be in front of the applicant's (oi guardian's) place of residence This condition is met. 3 The residence must not have useable off-street parking available or an off street space available that may he converted into disabled parking This condition is met. Since all three conditions of the City Council's Disabled Persons Parking Policy are met for this "Special Hardship" case, staff recommends installing a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the residence. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Since all three conditions of the City Council's Disabled Persons Parking Policy are met for this "Special Hardship" case. staff recommends installing a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the residence at 333E 4' Street. EXHIBITS: 1. Corresponderice ? Location Map 3 Photo 4. City Council Policy for Disabled Persons f aikitig 1 Explanation Mr. Alberto Morales requested a handicap parking space in front of his house located at 333 E. 4' Street. Staff visited the site and observed that available parking is limited in the immediate vicinity of Mr. Morales' house. Staff also verified that Mr. Morales does not have off-street parking available on his property. There are no handicap parking spaces iri the immediate vicinity of his residence. The City Council has adopted a policy, which is used to evaluate requests for Handicap parking spaces. The City Council Policy requirements for "Special Hardship" cases are as follows: 1. Applicant (or guardian) must be in possession of valid license plates for "disabled persons" or disabled veterans". This condition is met. 2. The proposed disabled parking space must be in front of the applicant's (or guardian's) place of residence. This condition is met. 3. The residence must not have useable off-street parking available or an off-street space available that may be converted into disabled parking. This condition is met. Since all three conditions of the City Council's Disabled Persons Parking Policy are met for this "Special Hardship" case, staff recommends installing a blue curb handicap parking space with sign in front of the residence at 333 E. 4' Street. The blue curb handicap parking space with sign will be installed by the City Public Works Department. rsc 2008 18 /() /1 t ..(2.,c < (")(i(_..`‘_?;, .)-1 • - 2 z.-?.._ a < • --(7- , • -1e.,1-2•(•,) ..!._, 3'11.<1 </ /V (:•,:z7 (/ c c • - /.")•^', , 1 1 "'CUSTOMER RI'CEIP'I CCOPY"' EXPIRES: 06/I012O09 *** D I S A IS L E 1) PERSONPLACAR D PLACARD NUMBER: 522 302J MORALES ALBERTO iii E 4TH ST NATIONAL (' f TY CA 9 1 9 5 0 ('O: i7 PIC: 1 TV: 92 DATE ISSUED: 07/01/OH t1O/YR: PU DT FEES RF('VD: 07/01/(1H AM'I' I)UI': AMT RI'.c'VD : NONE - ('A':II : - CIICK : - CR D'1' . HOU 613 27 0000000 0012 CS HOO 070108 N1 522302J DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VI•:Ilic'Lr:1: PLACARD IDENTIFICA'1'1ON CARD THIS IDENTIFICATION CARD OR FACSIMILE COPY IS TO BE CARRIED BY Tlll•: PLACARD OWNER. PRESENT IT '1) ANY I'F:.A('E OFFICER UPON DEMAND. IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY HMV RY PHONE OR MAI1, O1' ANY CHANGE OF ADDRESS. WHEN PARKING, HANG 'I'll1': PLACARD FROM THE REAR VIEW MIRROR. REt•;UVI: IT WHEN DRIVING. PLACARD#: EXPIRES: DOR: TSSUUEil: TYPE: 5223U2J 06/30/2009 08/18/1940 07/01/08 N1 PLACARD HOLDER: MORALES ALBERTO 333 F: 4TH ST NATIONAL CITY CA 1195n PU12('HASI•: 01•' FUEL (BUSINESS & PROFESSIONS CODE 1 3660) : STATE LAW REQUIRES SERVICE STATIONS TO REFUEL A DISABI.N.D PERSON'S VEHICLE AT SELF-SERV10E RATES, EXCEPT SEJ.•I•'-SERVICE FACILITIES WJTII ONLY ONE CASHIER. WHEN YOUR PLACARD 1S PROPERLY DISPLAYED, YOU MAY PARK IN/ON: `DISABLED PERSON PARKING ;;PACK; (BLUE '/,ONES) "METERED ZONES WITHOUT PAYING "GREEN ZONES WITHOUT RESTRICTIONS TO TIME LIMITS *STREETS WHERE PREFERENTTAT. PARKING PRIVILEGES APE GIVEN TO RESIDENTS AND MERCHANTS. YOU MAY NOT PARK 1N/ON: ''RED ZONES "TOW AWAY ZONES *WHITE OR YELLOW ZONES *SPACES MARKED RY CROSSHATCH LINKS NEXT '1'O DISABLED PERSON PARKING SPACES IT 1S CONSIDERED MISUSE: *To DISPLAY A PLACARD UNLESS THE DISABLED OWNER 1S BEING TRANSPORTED TO DISPLAY A PLACARD WHICH HAS BFEN CANCELLED OR REVOKED ''I'O LOAN YOUR PLACARD TO ANYONE, INCLUDING FAMILY MEMBERS. MISUSE TS A MISDEMEANOR (SECTION 4461VC) ANI) (.'AN RESULT 1N CANCELLATION OI( REVOCATION OE THE PLACARD, LOSS OF PARKING PRIVILEGES, AND/OR FINES. y l. '1 C•• r r.) • 211 4 `) .327 r AVE AVE:_ N t-J F__ \ LJ E_ 200 12 ?26 /44. 322 :22 408 417 I I 424 V) 1J' 221 .3!) 241 D 40`_) 41/ 42`.) 4.3/ (,4 2.30 • 240 .302 :304 DISABLED PERSONS PARKIN(: POLICY The purpose of disabled persons patkuig, zone is to provide designated parking spaces at uiatu( points of assembly dui the exclusive use of physically disabled persons whose vehicle displays a distinguishing license plate as authorized by the California I)epattnterit of Moto] Vehicles The City Council may upon teconuuendation of the City Engineer. designate specially marked and posted on street pinking spaces for disabled poisons pursuant to ('alitiuuia Vehicle Code ? 1 IO1, et seq at the billowing facilities 1 (iuveiiunent buildings serving the public such as adnunrstiatton buildin<.'s, public employment offices. public fanatics, police stations, ct. 2 I lospitals and cumalcscent homes xyttli route than 75 bed cap.icit� 1I Medical taiilntcs and doctors offices stalled by a maximum of lire practitioners Zones shall he Located io seive a maximum tnimbei of facilities on one block Community sei \ace facilities such as senu)t citizens service centers, etc 5 Accredited vocational training and educational facilities where no oil - strect parking is provided dui disabled pet sons (, Fiiipluyinen( offices fin tnafut c•nterpiiscs entployni: Wrote than 'UU persons 7 Public iecirational facilities including municipal swimming, pools, recreation halls, inu,eunu, etc 8 Public theaters, auditoriums, meeting halls, arenas, stadiums tvtth inure than loo seating capacity (11hei places ofasseinbly such as schools and churches IU Commercial and/or office building(s) with an aggregate of tn,.ne than 50,00O square feet of usable floor space /.one shall be located to serve a maximum number of facilities on one block 11 Iloteis catering; to ,.daily .guests. maintaining a ground flour lobby and a switchboard that is opei Z 1 how 5 per day. 1 Z .\ hotel of apaittucttt house catering to weekly or monthly guests and containing mote than 3O separate living units lit addition, disabled persons parkins; spaces ntav be !nodded within all publicly owned leased or controlled oft-suct•t pinking facilities a:; specified in the General Requirements (;eneral Requirements Each disabled persons pat king space shall be indicated by blue paint and a sign (white on blue) showing the international symbol of accessibility (a profile viecc of a wheelchair with occupant) \Vheic installed under the above criteria the total number ofdnsabled IRA sons ewb parking spaces will be limited to 3°;, of the total number of on -street parking spaces available in the area and shall he distributed uniformly within the aura Disabled persons parking \ctll not be installed at locations with.a hill -nine parking, pioluhnion \\"lien a disabled persons pat king, /one is installed cohere a part-time parking prohibition is un effect, the disabled persons packing Lone vtII ha\c the saline time testa n bons .rs the part time parking prohibition The cost of installing disabled peisutne parking will be assumed by the City on public streets and public off• street parking facilities In establishing on street pinking, fat runes hit the disabled there shall be a reasonable detrannnatorn made that the need is of an on-goutsg nature The intent is to in event the proliferation of special parking st;ills that may he installed for a short -teem purpose but later ate seldom used I °npistihe.d installation of such pat king stalls uuneeessarrlk increases the ('it) s maintenance and operations costs, rt:dote a+caiI.il)lc tra- shed parking fin the ;tcnetal public and detract from the or dal( eftccttxeness of the disabled poisons parking piogra it Special llarrlsiuip ('ases It is mkt the intention of the City to Inocidc personal iesetccd parknit! on the public might -)of -way, especially in residential areas Howe\ci, exceptions niac be pride in special hardship cases, piucadcd all oI the following; conditions exists (I) Applicant (or guardian) must be tit possession of valid license plates I�ir ..disabled persons' ur -disabled cerenans The proposed disabled paiking space must hem front of the applicant s lug guai dtan• s) place of i esidencc (3) Subject icsidctrcc must not have useable off -sheet parkuty available ur oll-sheet space mailable that may be carom -cited into disabled pat kith! NO•t'i. It must be emphasized that such packing spaces do not constuuii• ' pet sonal resetved packing' and that auv person kith valid "disabled persons.. license plates lnty pack in the above stalls Ilia p /0 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT /MEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 ITEM TITLE A resolution of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with kleinfelder, Inc. in the amount of $51,400 (Not to exceed) to provide Materials Testing Services for the National City Street Resurfacing Project (Funding is available through Proposition "A" Funds-TransNet) PREPARED BY Alberto Griego EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4386 On March 12, 2002 Kleinfelder, Inc. was contracted to provide City with "as needed" materials testing services for the Capital Improvement Projects. Currently, their contract has expired (the length of the contract was for three years, until March 12, 2005). Kleinfelder has since done the materials testing for Street Resurfacing, Pump Station and Slurry Seal projects for the City. This Resolution is to approve a contract with Kleinfelder, Inc. to provide material testing services for the National City Street Resurfacing Project FY08-09. Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement See attached Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director Account No. 307-409-500-598-6035 ST F ECOMM ATI N Ad • •t the Res /C MMI N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution 2. Agreement resurfacing A.200 (Rev. 7f03) A Resolution of the City of National City authorizing the Mayor to execute an agreement with kleinfelder, Inc. in the amount of $51,400 (Not to exceed) to provide Materials Testing Services for the National City Street Resurfacing Project (Funding is available through Proposition "A" Funds-TransNet) FINANCIAL STATEMENT The total estimated construction cost was approved by Resolution No.2008-107 that included construction, engineering inspection, materials testing and contingency items in the amount of $ 6,925,100.00. This amount included the proposed lowest bid amount ($5,327,000.00), approximately 20% ($1,065,400.00) for contingencies, and 5% ($266,350.00) for construction management, 2% ($106,540.00) for materials testing and surveying and 3% ($159,810.00) for inspection. Funding is available through Account Number 307-409-500-598-6035. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH KLEINFELDER WEST, INC. IN THE NOT TO EXCEED AMOUNT OF $51,400 TO PROVIDE MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES FOR THE NATIONAL CITY STREET RESURFACING PROJECT WHEREAS. the City desires to employ a contactor to provide materials testing services for the National City Street Resurfacing Project; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that Kleinfelder West, Inc. is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the City, and Kleinfelder West, Inc. is willing to perform such services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute an agreement with Kleinfelder West, Inc. in the not to exceed amount of $51,400 to provide materials testing services for the National City Street Resurfacing Project. Said Agreement in on file in the office of the City Clerk. ATTEST: PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM George H. Eiser, III City Attorney Ron Morrison, Mayor AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND KLEINFELDER WEST, INC THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this 23"" day of June, 2008, by arid between the CI I Y 01- NATIONAL CITY. a municipal corporation (the "CITY"), and KLEINFEt DER WEST, INC (the "CONSULTAN I . ). RECITALS WHEREAS, the CITY desires to employ a CONSULTANT to provide materials testing services for the National City Street Resurfacing Project, rY 08-09, Specification 08-04 WHEREAS, the CITY has determined that the CONSULTANT is a fine specializing in materials testing work, and is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the CITY. and the CONSULTAN f is willing to perform such services NOW. l HLREFORE. THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS' 1 ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT. The CITY hereby agrees to engage the CONSUL IANT and the CONSULTANT hereby agrees to perform the services hereinafter set forth in accordance with all terms and conditions contained herein. The CONSULTANT represents that all services required hereunder will be performed directly by the CONSULTANT or under direct supervision of flee CONSULTANT 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES. The CONSULTANT will perform services as set forth in the attached Exhibit "A" The CONSULTANT shall he responsible for all research and reviews related to the work and shall not rely on personnel of the CITY for such services, except as authorized in advance by the CITY The CONSULTANT shall appear at meetings cited in Exhibit "A" to keep staff and City Council advised of the progress on the project The CITY may unilaterally, or upon request from the CONSULTANT, front time to time reduce or increase the Scope of Services to be performed by the CONStJI TANT under this Agreement Upon doing so, the CITY and the CONSULTANT agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction or increase in the compensation associated with said change in services, not to exceed a factor of 10% from the base amount 3 PROJECT COORDINATION AND SUPERVISION. Din Daneshfar, Principal Civil Engineer hereby is designated as the Project Coordinator for the CI I Y and will monitor the progress and execution of this Agreement. The CONSUL TANI shall assign a single Project Director to provide supervision and have overall responsibility for the progress and execution of this Agreement for the CONSULTANT Ron Thomson, Operations Manager thereby is designated as the Project Director tor the CONSUL TAN I 1 4 COMPENSATION AND PAYMENT. The compensation for the CONSULTANT shall be based on monthly killings covering actual work performed Billings shall include labor classifications, respective rates, hours worked and also materals. if any The total cost for all work described in Exhibit "A" shall not exceed the schedule given in Exhibit "A"(the Base amount) without prior written authorization from the Project Manager Monthly invoices will be processed for payment and remitted within thirty (30) days from receipt of invoice, provided that work is accomplished consistent with Exhibit "A' as determined by the CFI Y 1 he CONSULTANT shall maintain all books, documents. papers, employee time sheets. accounting records, and other evidence pertaining to costs incurred and shall make such materials available at its office at all reasonable times during the term of this Agreement and for three (3) years from the date of final payment under this Agreement. tor inspection by the CITY and for furnishing of copies to the CITY, if requested 5. ACCEPTABILITY OF WORK. The City shall decide any and all questions which may arise as to the quality or acceptability of the services per formed and the manner of performance, the acceptable completion of this Agreement and the amount of compensation due In time event the CONSULTANT and the City cannot agree to the quality of acceptability of the work, the mariner of performance acid/or the compensation payable to the CONSULTANT in this Agreement, the City or the CONSULTANT shall give to the other written notice. Within term (10) business days, the CONSUL FAN f and the City shall each prepare a report which supports their position and file the same with the other party The City shall. with reasonable diligence, determine the quality or acceptability of the work. the manner of pertormance and/or the compensation payable to the CONSULTANT. 6 LENGTH OF AGREEMENT. Completion dates or time durations for specific portions of time Project are set forth in Exhibit "A". DISPOSITION AND OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS. The Memoranda, Reports, Maps Drawings, Plans, Specifications and other documents prepared by the CONSULTANT for this Project, whether paper or electronic, shall become the property of the CI 1 Y for use with respect to this Project, and shall be turned over to the CITY upon completion of the Project, or any phase thereof. as contemplated by this Agreement. Contemporaneously with the transfer of documents. the CONSULTANT hereby assigns to the CITY and CONSULTANT thereby expressly waives and disclaims, any copyright in, and the right to reproduce, all wiitten material. drawings, plans, specifications or other work prepared under this agreement, except upon the CITY's prior authorization regarding reproduction which authorization shall not be unreasonably withheld The CONSULTANI shall, upon request of the CITY, execute any further document(s) necessary to further effectuate this waiver and disclaimer. The CONSULTANT agrees that the CITY may use, reuse, alter, reproduce, modify, assign, transfer, or in any other way, medium or method utilize the CONSULTANT 's written work product for the CITY's purposes. and time CONSULTAN 1 expressly waives and disclaims any residual rights granted to it by Civil Code Sections 980 through 989 relating to intellectual property and artistic works 2 Cry s Sta.dara Agrereu sprit .I me 2008 rews.0” Any modification or reuse by the CI LY of documents, drawings or specifications prepared by the CONSULTANT shall relieve the CONSULTANT from liability under Section 14 but only with respect to the effect of the modification or reuse by the CITY, or for any liability to the CI TY should the documents he used by the CITY for some project other than what was expressly agreed upon within the Scope of this project, unless otherwise mutually agreed. 8. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT. Both parties Hereto in the performance of this Agreement will be acting in an independent capacity and not as agents, employees. partners or joint venturers with one another Neither the CONSULTANT nor the CONSUL TANT 'S employees are employee of the CI I Y and are not entitled to any of the rights, benefits. or priwteges of the CFI Y's employees, including but not limited to retirement, medical. unemploy- ment. or workers' compensation insurance. This Agreement contemplates the personal services of the CONSULTANT and the CONSULTANTs employees, and it is recognized by the parties that a substantial Inducement to the CITY for entering into this Agreement was, and is, the professional reputation and competence of the CONSUL TANT arid its employees. Neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be assigned by the CONSULTAN I without the pnor written consent of the CITY Nothing herein contained is intended to prevent the CONSUL I AN I from employing or hiring as many employees, or sub CONSULTANT s, as the CONSULTANT may deeni necessary for the proper and efficient performance of this Agreement All agreements by CONSULTANT with its subCONSt)I.TANT (s) shall require the subCONSULTANT to adhere to the applicable terms of this Agreement 9. CONTROL. Neither the CITY nor its officers, agents or employees shall have any control over the conduct of the CONSULTANT or any of the CONSULTANT 's employees except as herein set forth, arid the CONSULTANT expressly agrees not to representent that the consult or the CONSULTANT 's agents. servants, or employees are in any manner agents. servants or employees of the CITY, it being understood that the CONSULTAN I . its agents, servants, and employees are as to the CI lY wholly independent CONSULTANT s and that the CONSUL I ANT 's obligations to the CITY are solely such as are prescribed by this Agreement. 10 COMPLIANCE WiTH APPLICABLE LAW. The CONSULTANT . in the performance of the services to be provided herein, shall comply with all applicable State and Federal statutes and regulations, and all applicable ordinances, rules and regulations of the City of National City, whether now in force or subsequently enacted The CONSULTANT , and each of its sub CONSUL PANT s, shall obtain and maintain a current City of National City business license prior to and during performance of any work pursuant to this Agreement. 11 LICENSES, PERMITS, ETC. l he CONSUL I ANT represents and covenants that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications, and approvals of whatever nature that are legally required to practice its profession. The CONSUL I AN f represents and covenants that the CONSUL PANT shall, at its sole cost and expense. keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement, any license. permit, or approval which is legally required for the CONSULi AN i to practice its profession 3 (try'; $Landaro l greerw. id - Jure 2C)C rerte„ 12 STANDARD OF CARE. A The CONSULTANT, in performing any services under this Agreement, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the CONSULTANT 'S trade or profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations The CONSULTANT shall take all special precautions necessary to protect the CONSULTANT's employees and members of the public from risk of harm arising out of the nature of the work and/or the conditions of the work site B. Unless disclosed in writing prior to the date of this agreement, the CONSUL PANT warrants to the CITY that it is not now, nor has it for the five (5) years preceding, been debarred by a governmental agency or involved in debarment, arbitration or litigation pioceedings concerning the CONSULTANT's professional performance or the furnishing of materials or services relating thereto C The CONSULTAN f is responsible for identifying any unique products, treatments, processes or materials whose availability is critical to the success of the project the CONSULTANT has been retained to perform, within the time requirements of the CITY, or, when no time is specified, then within a commercially reasonable time. Accordingly, unless the CONSULTANT has notified the CITY otherwise, the CONSULTANT warrants that all products, materials, processes or treatments identified in the project documents pi epared for the CITY are reasonably commercially available. Any failure by the CONSUI.TAN i to use due diligence under this sub -paragraph will render the CONSULTANT liable to the CITY for any increased costs that result from the CITY's later inability to obtain the specified items or any reasonable substitute within a price range that allows for project completion in the time frame specified or when not specified, then within a commercially reasonable time 13. NON-DISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS. I he CONSULTANT shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of age, race. color, ancestry, religion, sex. sexual orientation, marital status. national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition. The CONSUL I ANT will take positive action to insure that applicants are employed without regard to their age, race, color, ancestry, religion, sex, sexual orientation. marital status. national origin, physical handicap, or medical condition Such action shall include but not be limited to the following. employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation. and selection for training, including apprenticeship the CONSULTANT agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment any notices provided by the CITY setting forth the provisions of this non-discrimination clause. 14 CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION. The CITY may from time to time communicate to the CONSUI.TANi certain confidential information to enable the CONSULTANT to effectively perform the services to be provided herein. The CONSUL 1 ANT shall treat all such information as confidential and shall riot disclose any part thereof without the prior written consent of the Ci FY The CONSULTANT shall limit the use and circulation of such information. even within its own organization, to the extent necessary to perform the services to be provided herein. The foregoing obligation of this Section 13, however, shall not apply to any part of the information that (i) has been disclosed in publicly available sources of information, (ii) is. through no fault of the CONSULTANT , hereafter disclosed in publicly available sources of information; (iii) is already in the possession of the CONSULTANT without any obligation of confidentiality. or (iv) has been or is hereafter rightfully disclosed to the CONSUL TAN r by a third party. but only to the extent that the use or disclosure thereof tias been or is rightfully authorized by that third party 4 Cary 3 Standout .'„/H•«o,e:a June 2008 u.b C,n The CONSULTANI shall not disclose any reports, recommendations, conclusions or other results of the services or the existence of the subject matter of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the CITY In its performance hereunder. the CONSULTANT shall comply with all legal obligations it may now or hereafter have respecting the Information or other property of any other person, firm or corporation CONSULTANT shall be liable to CI I Y for any damages caused by breach of this condition, pursuant to the provisions of Section 14 15 INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS. The CONSULTANT agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of National City. its officers and employees, against and from any and all liability, loss, damages to property, injuries to. or death of any person or persons, and all claims. demands, suits actions. proceedings. reasonable attorneys' fees, and defense costs, of any kind or nature, including workers' compensation claims, of or by anyone whomsoever. resulting from or arising out of the CONSULTANT 's negligent performance of this Agreement 16 WORKERS' COMPENSATION. The CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Insurance and Safety Acts of the State of California, the applicable provisions of Division 4 and 5 of the California Government Code and all amendments thereto; and all similar state or Federal acts or laws applicable, and shall indemnify. and hold harmless the CITY and its officers, and employees from and against all claims. demands. payments. suits, actions, proceedings and judgments of every nature and description, Including reasonable attorney's fees and defense costs presented, brought or recovered against the CITY or its officers, employees, or volunteers. for or on account of any liability under any of said acts which may be incurred by season of any work to be performed by the CONSULTANT under this Agreement 11 INSURANCE. 1 he CONSULTANT, at its sole cost and expense, shall purchase and maintain, and shall require its sub Consultant's. when applicable. to purchase and maintain throughout the term of this agreement. the following insurance policies A If checked, Professional Liability Insurance (errors and omissions) with minimum limits of $1,000.000 per occurrence t3 Automobile insurance covering all bodily injury and property damage incurred during the performance of this Agreement. with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limit per accident. Such automobile insurance shall include owned, non -owned, and hired vehicles ("any auto") C Commercial general liability insurance, with minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate, covering all bodily injury and property damage arising out of its operations under this Agreement D Workers' compensation insurance in an amount sufficient to meet statutory requirements covering all of CONTRACTOR'S/CONSULTANT'S employees and employers' liability insurance with limits 'of at least $1,000,000 per accident In addition, the policy shall he endorsed with a waiver of subrogation in favor of the City Said endorsement shall be provided prior to commencement of work under this Agreement E. The aforesaid policies shall constitute primary insurance as to the CITY. its officers, employees, and volunteers, so that any other policies held by the CITY shall not contribute to any loss under said insurance Said policies shall provide for thirty (30) days prior written notice to the CITY of cancellation or material change 5 Cary a Sian,t.nd Au, uuuu -.tune 2003 re.,s,o, F Said policies, except for the professional liability and workers' compensation policies, shall name the CITY and its officers, agents and employees as additional insureds, and separate additional insured endorsements shall be provided G If required insurance coverage is provided on a "claims made rather than "occurrence" form, the CONSULTANT shall rnaintairi such insurance coverage for three years after expiration of the terrn (and any extensions) of this Agreement In addition. the "retro" date must be on or before the date of this Agreement. H Any aggregate insurance limits must apply solely to this Agreement. Insurance shall be written with only California admitted companies which hold a current policy holder's alphabetic and financial size category rating of not less than A VIII according to the current Best's Key Rating Guide, or a company equal financial stability that is approved by the City's Risk Manager. In the event coverage is provided by non -admitted "surplus lines" carriers, they must be included on the most recent California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI list) and otherwise meet rating requirements J. This Agreement shall not take effect until certificate(s) or other sufficient proof that these insurance provisions have been complied with, are filed with and approved by the CITY's Risk Manager If the CONSULTANT does not keep all of such insurance policies in full force and effect at all times during the terms of this Agreement, the CITY may elect to treat the failure to maintain ttre requisite insurance as a breach of this Agreement and terminate the Agreement as provided herein K All deductibles and self -insured retentions in excess of $10.000 must be disclosed to and approved by the CITY. 18. LEGAL FEES. If any party bangs a suit or action against the other party arising from any breach of any of the covenants or agreements or any inaccuracies in any of the representations and warranties on the part of the other party arising out of this Agreement, then in that event, the prevailing party in such action or dispute, whether by final Judgment or out of -court settleinerit, shall be entitled to have and recover of and from the other party all costs and expenses of suit, including attorneys' fees. For purposes of determining who is to be considered the prevailing party, it is stipulated that attorney's fees incurred in the prosecution or defense of the action or suit shalt not be considered in determining the amount of the judgment or award Attorney's fees to the prevailing party if other than the CITY shall, in addition, be limited to the amount of attorney's fees incurred by the CITY in its prosecution or defense of the action, irrespective of the actual amount of attorney's fees incurred by the prevailing party. 19 MEDIATION/ARBITRATION. If a dispute arises out of or relates to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, the parties agree first to try, in good faith, to settle the dispute by mediation in San Diego, California, in accordance with the Commercial Mediation Rules of the American Arbitration Association (the "AAA") before resorting to arbitration. The costs of mediation shall be borne equally by the parties Any controversy or claim arising out of. or relating to, this Agreement, or breach thereof, which is not resolved by mediation shall be settled by arbitration in San Diego. California, in accordance with the Commercial Arbitration Rules of the AAA then existing Any award rendered shall he final and conclusive upon the parties. and a judgment thereon may be entered iri any court having jurisdiction over the subject matter of the controversy. The expenses of the arbitration shall be borne equally by the parties to the arbitration, provided that each party shall pay for and bear the costs of its own experts, evidence and attorneys' fees, except that the arbitrator inay assess such expenses or any part thereof against a specified party as part of thie arbitration award 6 t;ny •• St. ,. ; rid Ay,.w,re,n - Jut .2JJ3 rev,s.on 20. TERMINATION. A. This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by the CITY. Termination without cause shall he effective only upon 60-day's written notice to the CONSULTANT. During said 60-day period the CONSULTANT shall perform all services in accordance with this Agreement B. This Agreement may also be terminated immediately by ttie CITY for cause in the event of a material breach of this Agreement, misrepresentation by the CONSULTANT in connection with the formation of this Agreement or the performance of services. or the failure to perform services as directed by the CITY C. Termination with or without cause shall be effected by delivery of written Notice of Termination to the CONSULTANT as provided for herein. D. In the event of termination, all finished or unfinished Memoranda Reports, Maps, Drawings, Plans, Specifications and other documents prepared by the CONSULTANT whether paper or electronic. shall immediately become the property of and be delivered to the CITY, and the CONSUL PANT shaft be entitled to receive lust and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other matenals up to the effective date of the Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and fess any damages caused the CITY by the CONSULTANT 's breach, if any. Thereafter, ownership of said written material shall vest in the CITY all rights set forth in Section 6 E The C l i Y further reserves the nght to immediately terminate this Agreement upon (1) the filing of a petition in bankruptcy affecting the CONSULTANT, (2) a reorganization of the CONSULTANT for the benefit of creditors. or (3) a business reorganization, change in business name or change in business status of the CONSUI I ANT 21. NOTICES. All notices or other communications required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing, and shall be personally delivered; or sent by overnight mail (Federal Express or the like), or sent by registered or certified mail. postage prepaid, return receipt requested; or seat by ordinary mail. postage prepaid. or telegraphed or cabled; or delivered or seat by telex. telecopy, facsimile or fax, and shall he deemed received upon the earlier of (r) if personally delivered, the date of delivery to the address of the person to receive such notice. (ii) it sent by overnight mail. the business day following its deposit in such overnight mail facility, (nr) if mailed by registered. certified or ordinary mail, five (5) days (ten (10) days if the address is outside the State of California) after the date of deposit in a post office, mailbox. mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service. (iv) if given by telegraph or cable, when delivered to the telegraph company with charges prepaid. or (v) if given by telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax, when sent. Any notice, request. demand, direction or other communication delivered or sent as specified above shall be directed to the lot owing per sons To CITY l o CONSULTANT' Mar yam Babaki City Engineer Engineering Department City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950-4301 Ron Thomson, Operations Manager Kleinfelder West. Inc. 5015 Shoreham Place San Diego, CA 92122 7 Gay, I :UU6 re+*lon Notice of change of address shall be given by written notice in the manner specified in this Section Rejection or other refusal to accept or the inability to deliver because of changed address of which no notice was given shall be deemed to constitute receipt of the notice, demand, request or communication sent Any notice. request, demand, direction or other communication sent by cable, telex, telecopy, facsimile or fax must be confirmed within forty-eight (48) hours by letter mailed or delivered as specified in this Section 22. CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND POLITICAL REFORM ACT OBLIGATIONS. During the term of this Agreement, the CONSULTANT shall not perform services of any kind for any person or entity whose interests conflict in any way with those of the City of National City. The CONSULTANT also agrees not to specify any product. treatment. process or material for the project in which the CONSULTANT has a material financial interest. either direct or indirect. without first notifying the CITY of that fact. The CONSULTANT shall at all times comply with the terms of the Political Reform Act and the National City Conflict of Interest Code The CONSULTANT shall immediately disqualify itself and shall not use its official position to influence in any way any matter coming before the CI1 Y in which the CONSULTANT has a financial interest as defined in Government Code Section 87103 The CONSULTANT represents that it has no knowledge of any financial inteiests that would require it to disqualify itself from any matter on which it might perform services for the CITY. ❑ If checked, the CONSULTANT shall comply with all of the reporting requirements of the Political Reform Act and the National City Conflict of Interest Code Specifically, the CONSULTANT shall file a Statement of Economic Interests with the City Clerk of the City of National City in a timely manner on forrns which the CONSUL [ANT shall obtain from the City Clerk The CONSULTAN I shall be strictly liable to the CITY for all damages. costs or expenses the CITY may suffer by virtue of any violation of this Paragraph 21 by the CONSULTANT 23 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. A. Computation of fime Periods. if any date or time period provided fot in this Agreerirent is or ends on a Saturday, Sunday or federal, state or legal holiday. then such date shall automatically be extended until 5:00 p m. Pacific Time of the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or federal. state or legal holiday f3 Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in multiple counteiparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. but all of which, together, shall constitute but one and the same instniment C. Captions. Any captions to. or headings of, the sections or subsections of this Agreement are solely for the convenience of the parties hereto, are not a part of this Agreement. and shall not be used for the interpretation or determination of the validity of this Agreement or any provision hereof. D. No Obligations to ]bird Parties. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, the execution and delivery of this Agreement shall not be deemed to confer any rights upon, or obligate any of the parties hereto, to any person or entity other than the parties hereto. F Exhibits and Schedules. Exhibit "A" attached hereto is hereby incorporated herein by this reference for all purposes. F. Amendment to this Agreement The terms of this Agreement may not be modified or amended except by an instrument in writing executed by each of the parties hereto 8 Cdys Standard Agreeme..? I,,.„. gin, CYrSiOf G. Waiver. The waiver or failure to enforce any provision of this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver of any future breach of any such provision or any other provision hereof i I. Applicable Law. I his Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. I. kntire Agreement This Agreement supersedes any prior agreements, negotiations avid communications, oral or wntten. and contains the entire agreement between the parties as to the subject matter hereof. No subsequent agreernent, representation, or promise made by either party hereto. or by or to an employee, officer. agent or representative of any party hereto shall be of any effect unless it is in writing and executed by the party to be hound thereby. J Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto K. Construction l he parties acknowledge and agree that (i) each party is of equal bargaining strength, (ii) each party has actively participated in the drafting, preparation and negotiation of this Agreement, (iii) each such party has consulted with or has had the opportunity to consult with its own, independent counsel and such other professional advisors as such party has deemed appropriate, relative to any and all matters contemplated under this Agreement. (iv) each party arid such party s counsel and advisors have reviewed this Agreement, (v) each party has agreed to enter into this Agreement following such review and the rendering of such advice, and (vi) any rule or conshuction to the effect that ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in the interpretation of this Agreement. or any portions hereof. or any amendments hereto IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date and year first above written CITY OF NATIONAL CITY By Ron Morrrsion, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H Eiser, III City Attorney KLEINFELDER WEST, INC. (rnrpnr.uM1ln s,)n,7tur.s uf twopcutor 11e ("cons) 41,1 e (Name) By: 9 (Print) (Title) arne) (Print) ('--F) (title) Ksi Ait Gay S 513.01rd Agwenlrnl Jain, 2108 i, nbNn �KL E/NFEL DER Ip,9hr People R,9ht Solouons June 18, 2008 Proposal No. 95090 Mr. Alberto Griego City of National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, California 91950 Subject: Proposal to Provide Testing Laboratory Services Project: National City Street Resurfacing Project, FY 08-09 National City, California Specification No. 08-04 Dear Mr. Griego: INTRODUCTION NJ k lamfoldeo Kleinfelder is pleased to submit the following proposal to provide testing laboratory services for the subject project. In preparing this proposal we have utilized project specifications. While a detailed construction schedule was not available at the time we prepared this proposal, we have relied on the 42 working day schedule noted in the project specifications. SCOPE We understand that our scope will primarily be: • As -requested compaction testing for base material; • As -requested compaction testing for asphaltic concrete paving; • Sampling emulsion aggregate slurry for field consistency testing arid laboratory testing of wet track abrasion, oil content, and water content, P 95090fSDI8P1 /0 Copyright 2008 Kleinfcldcr Page 1 of 3 Jurie 18. 2008 /0 '.0 I' '.r.i�� CI' at, F'.h,. 1'{ Ky..21) tls a t20.•n('I 4I, diddor (Om • Laboratory maximum density testing for base, and hot mix asphalt; and • Preparation of a final compaction test summary report. • Conformance testing of asphaltic concrete including oil content. and sieve analysis. FEES Fees for our services will be charged on a time -and -materials basis at the rates and terms currently under contract with the City. No charges will he assessed for vehicle, mileage, or standard test equipment. BUDGET For budgeting purposes, we have prepared an Estimated Budget of $51,400. The following are the schedule assumptions we used in arriving at our estimated budget: 1 We will be scheduled for 90 hours of soil, base, and asphalt compaction testing; 2. We will be scheduled for 90 hours of asphalt rubber and aggregate membrane inspection and observation; 3. We will he scheduled for 60 hours of slurry seal sampling; 4. We will be scheduled for 12 hours of concrete inspection; 5. We will be requested to perform conformance testing on 40 slurry seal samples; 6. Only 2 maximum density tests will be required for base material and 2 for asphaltic concrete; and 7. We will not be requested to provide smoothness testing. Our budget does not include costs for overtime or retesting. APPROACH All services will be provided at the request and direction of the City of National City's designated representative. Our field personnel will prepare reports in triplicate each site visit outlining hours, work performed, and test results. Copies of these reports will be r'-9a01-31)r1;1)I8P 1 70 Copyright 2008 Kleinfcldcr r'nye. 2 of .1 June 18, 2008 I/ given to the on -site representative designated by the City of National City (the City) Copies of these reports as well laboratory test reports will be mailed weekly to the City's Project Manager. Any failing tests or non -conforming work observed will be brought to the immediate attention of the City. CLOSING We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look forward to working with you on this project. Please contact our office at (858) 320-2000 if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, KLEINFELDER WEST, INC. Y-fro". —"Lof David W. Timms Ronald C. Thomson Construction Engineer Operations Manager RCT:rp Enclosures: Estimated Budget Fee Schedule P 05090!SD18P170 Copyright 2008 Kleintelder Page 3 of 3 .tune 18. 2008 is r" ESTIMATED BUDGET National City Street Resurfacing Project, FY 08-09 National City, California 302-4 Emulsion - Aggregate Slurry Includes 60 hours field sampling and testing; 40 wet track abrasion tests; 40 oil content and gradation tests; arid 40 moisture content tests. 203-12 Asphalt Rubber & Aggregate Membrane Includes 90 hours field inspection and observation; and 4 hours Supervisory Technician 302-5 Hot Mix Asphalt Pavement Includes 30 hours compaction testing: 4 hours Supervisory Technician; 2 oil content and gradation tests; and 2 maximum density tests. 303 General Concrete Construction Includes 12 hours concrete inspection; 4 hours sample pick up; and 2 hours Supervisory Technician 300 & 301 Base, and Aggregate Base Includes 60 hours compaction testing; 4 hours Supervisory Technician; and 2 maximum density tests. Office Includes 12 hours Project Manager; and Final compaction test summary report. $27,900 $8,300 $4,300 $1,700 $6,200 $3,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED BUDGET: $51,400 I'-95090/SD18P 1 TO Junc 18. 2008 Copyriyhl 2008 Kleinteldcr City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT METING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 7 / ITEM TITLE Resolution waiving the bid process and authorizing a sole source purchase for park furnishings such as benches, standard and ADA-compliant picnic tables, and waste receptacles made from recycled materials from Wishbone Industries LTD. in the amount of $346,201.00 as outlined in the presentation to the City of National City City Council on January 22, 2008. (Funded through General Funds) PREPARED BY Kenneth Fernandez DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4388 EXPLANATION Please see attached page with explanation. Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval ,— Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director The total budgeted amount for the equipment is $363,512.00. Funding is available through Account 001- 409-500-598-4127. (General Funds). Account No TAFF RECOMMEN ! ATION Ad', ;e Resol �.•' RD / C . T S • • N4ECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution 2. Price Quote from Wishbone Industries LTD l SPEC 07-06-B A -zoo (Rev Ifni) EXPLANATION: Last year, at the direction of the City Council, the 2007/08 budget included $1.2 million for rehabilitation, repair, and enhancement of parks and recreation facilities in the City of National City As a result, the Engineering Department took the lead in investigating, identifying, and prioritizing the needed improvements for the park facilities within the City. Considering the long list of needs in the City and the budget constraints, the effort quickly focused on the three largest and most utilized parks in the City: Kimball Park, Las Palmas Park, and El Toyon Park. These parks also represent the highest use for the City from a geographical and population standpoint. On January 22, 2008, the Engineering Department presented and provided a status update and requested feedback from the City Council. In order to provide the City with the most expedient, cost-effective, and high -quality service and product, it was discussed that the Parks Project would be divided into three phases: Painting (Phase 1), Parks Furnishings (Phase 2). and Building & Miscellaneous Improvements (Phase 3). Phase One was awarded on May 20, 2008. The painting and associated field work of several city parks buildings and structures were completed on June 27, 2008. The Engineering Department is now moving expeditiously into Phase Two. The design package for Phase Two is complete The purchasing and delivery of the parks furnishings is next. In order for the equipment to be delivered in time and installed for public usage prior to the conclusion of the autumn season, the Engineering Department is recommending the following course of action in lieu of the standard formal bidding process in an attempt to offset the duration required to advertise, bid, award, purchase, manufacture, and deliver the equipment. It is requested that Council waive the formal bidding requirements as allowed in Section 12 of Purchasing Ordinance #1480, and in Chapter 2.60 220(d) of the Municipal Code, and award the contract to Wishbone Industries LTD. for the following reasons. 1) We recommend these products from this manufacturer because they meet the City Council's park theme along with specific environmental and functional needs 2) Wishbone Industries LTD. is the sole source manufacturer of this product. There are no known distributors in California that offer these specific models of park furnishings that utilize recyclable materials and coordinate with the new park design theme. The total cost of the equipment is estimated to be $363,512.00. This amount includes the equipment and delivery purchase price of $346,201.00 plus approximately 5% ($17,311.00) for contingencies. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY WAIVING THE BID PROCESS AND AUTHORIZING A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE OF PARK FURNISHINGS, SUCH AS BENCHES, STANDARD AND ADA-COMPLIANT PICNIC TABLES, AND WASTE RECEPTACLES FROM WISHBONE INDUSTRIES, LTD., IN THE AMOUNT OF $346,201 WHEREAS, the City of National City desires to rehabilitate, repair, and enhance the parks and recreation facilities in the city; and WHEREAS, Staff has evaluated the needed improvements for the parks, and have determined that the three largest and most utilized parks in the city would be the first to be improved: Kimball Park, Las Palmas Park and El Toyon Park; and WHEREAS, to provide the City with the most expedient, cost-effective, and high - quality service and product, it was determined that the Parks Project would be divided into three phases: Painting (Phase 1), Parks Furnishings (Phase 2), and Building & Miscellaneous Improvements (Phase 3);and WHEREAS, since Phase 1 has been completed, Phase 2 is ready to begin with the upgrade/replacement of Park Furnishings such as Benches. Standard and ADA-Compliant Picnic Tables, and Waste Receptacles, which the City Council has directed be made out of recycled materials; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that Wishbone Industries LTD is the only vendor of park furnishing made from recycled materials that satisfies the City Council's park theme along with specific environmental and functional needs; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.60 220(B) of the National City Municipal Code, the Purchasing Agent may dispense with the requirements of the bidding process when the commodity can be obtained by only one source. Sole source procurements may be used when there is only one source from which a particular commodity is available and there is no adequate substitute. Sole source procurement may also be used when it is clear that competitive bidding will not produce any competitive advantage or would be impractical or not meet an urgent city procurement need. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby waives the bid process, and authorizes the purchase of Park Furnishings such as Benches, Standard and ADA-Compliant Picnic Tables, and Waste Receptacles from Wishbone Industries, LTD., in the amount of $346,201. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July. 2008 Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk George H. Eiser, III City Attorney QUOTATION WISHBONE INDUSTRIES LTD. /109. 27090 Gloucester Way Toll Free: 1 866.671, 0476 tangit-y. BC Telephone: 604 626•04/h VJW 3/-5 Fax: 604 C2G94w6 CST No 8853.1 9,,5 Email: sale5,ywlinnont ltd.cow PST No 32477/ Webslte'. Www w,cnnbneRd.CUm Quotation No : 0.11008)KA Quotation Date: urly 7.2008 Terms of Payment: COO Customer No: Customer. Contact Name: Phone NO.: Fax NO : Reference No.: Note: C1ty of Natlnnal C.tv PubIIC WO(KS Dept 2100 Hover Avenue Nal,onel Clty (A 91450 Byron Watle 619 244 3118 Bill To: c c SAME'•• Slut/ To Clay of N.10cm C1ty Purlkc WO1 ks DeLt 210o Movnr Avcr National Crty. CA 91950 Delivery Date: 8 12 weeks Cat. No L rPRFFAI 6 PTFFAL 5 PTrrALN 8 Description I Size Wishbone Full Frame RCDC11 Wishbone Etlll F r.lme P,Cr11t Table Wishbone Full Frame P,cniC Table WileAl (Darr ACCtss,ble WF'R 73 West Eno Waste Pet COLA le fcnter Arm for Full Ff.lmc Re I1Ch Galvanized liner Color Frame 1 Lumber 6 ft Texture0 Black 61t Texturedt Black 8 ft textutetl Ria(k Weight/ltem ILbsl Send Price Quantity Total Price 1 145 $ 1,100oD I 48 5 52. P0000 Sand Sand Texturen RI.trk Textured Black N/A Snd N/A 740 5 1.12000 70 S /840000 300 5 1 1)001) 47 5 64,390 OD )75 5 925 0(1 144 S 15 5,700 1.0 5 5 120.CO 48 5 5 760 00 Total Product Cost, Excl. Fre ght & Taxes 111 5 7700 144 5 3.88H 00 $ 338,438.00 LFreight J Freight Carrier. Freight Quote No.: Mode of Freight - Payment Terms' Notes: MC Fr C19ht OM F Total Weigh/1113sI. Freight Cost: Date of Delivery: /1./00 {s Lr,MY van Rate 5 5.547 SO..nrIuuol C 2 nours uoa° hmP, NC"yn( uuote base on 15 n.Tys Customer is resoogsml,Ie fnr Io .li states taxes ue 1n August th(• ,v,nainln9 balance due nn n,•Lv,`ry [ otal Product Cost. Excl. Freight d Taxes Fr Crgnt Cost 'Total Cost Ount.11,on Preoareo By. )Ohn ).1nSCn Lo, ,„,,,ion Date. 7•11,1 2008 1 USD 7,763.00 50% Deprv,it (h(Que S 338.438.017)1 7 76i 00 L IS 346,201. 00] ouotation Vall(1 Until: 7 Aug 2008 sEETING DATE City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT July 15. 2008 8 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE Resolution accepting a proposal from CityGate Associates, LLC, to conduct a Master Plan Study for the Fire Department, in the amount of $39,500.00 PREPARED BY Brenda E. Hodges, C.P Rod Juniel, Fire Ch EXPLANATION TMENT Purchasing Dept. EXT.x4570 Fire Department x4550 Request for Proposal #GS0708-3 was issued to hire a consultant to conduct a Master Plan (Response Time) Study for the Fire Department. Proposal packages were mailed to ten (10) vendors, netting four (4) responses. Proposals were due 5/27/08. The Purchasing Department conducted the initial review, and determined that all four responses met the minimum qualifications, and were therefore eligible for competitive evaluation. A review/selection committee consisting of a Management Analyst, Firefighter and Battalion Chief from the Fire Department, individually scored the proposals. and rated the responses based on past experience, thoroughness of proposal, staff qualifications. references and cost. The proposal from CityGate Associates was ranked the highest by all three evaluators. The proposals were scored (maximum 100 points possible), and ranked in the following order: CityGate Associates: 98 points ESCI: 88 points Deccan International: 79 points Matnx: 73 points The Fire Department recommends awarding the contract to CityGate Associates. in the amount of $39,500 00 ( Environmental Review _ N/A Financial Statement FY08 funds have been encumbered MIS Approval Approved By: Finance Director 001 412-125-299 Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Recommend that the award be made to CityGate Associates, LLC, and that authority be given to the Purchasing Agent to issue resulting purchase order. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION not applicable ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution Resolution No. A 200 (Rev 7/03) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH CITYGATE ASSOCIATES, LLC IN THE AMOUNT OF $39,500 TO CONDUCT A MASTER PLAN STUDY FOR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT WHEREAS, the City of National City desires to employ a contractor to conduct a Master Plan Study for the Fire Department; and WHEREAS, after conducting an RFP process, the City has determined that CityGate Associates, LLC is qualified by experience and ability to perform the services desired by the City, and is willing to perform such services for the amount of $39,500. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Chairman to execute an Agreement with CityGate Associates, LLC in the amount of $39,500 to conduct a Master Plan Study for the Fire Department. Said Agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney L .EETING DATE July 15, 2008 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AGENDA ITEM NO. 9 7JTEM TITLE Resolution accepting the lowest, responsive, responsible bid from TW Mobile Engineering Technologies, Inc , for the outfitting (build-up) of 10 police cars and 1 animal control truck. for a total award of $148,357 71 PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Brenda E. Hodges, C.P.M. NTMENT Purchasing Dept. 0:14#4 EXTx4570 Request for Bid #GS0708-2 was issued for the outfitting (build-up) of our ten (10) new, 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors, and one (1) Ford F250 animal control truck. All eleven vehicles have already been purchased and received This contract is to outfit the vehicles with police/pursuit equipment (lightbars. sirens, flashers, prisoner seats/partitions, weapon/computer mounts, radio equipment, graphics, etc). Bids were mailed to twelve (12) vendors, netting seven (7) responses. Bids were opened and publicly read on June 19. 2008 with one vendor present for the opening. TW Mobile Engineering Inc. (aka Thunderworks) offered the lowest, responsive, responsible bid in the amount of S148,614.89. Northstar Electronics submitted a bid for $87.812.81, but it was incomplete and therefore unresponsive Adamson Police Products submitted a bid to provide parts and equipment. but did not bid on the installation. Four (4) vendors opted not to bid, and five (5) vendors did not respond. We have successfully used TW Mobile Engineering in the past, and they are located in San Diego County which will make transporting vehicles back and forth easier. Three public agencies were contacted and all gave positive retere The award to TW Mobile Engineering will be $148.357.71, including tax and delivery. J ( Environmental Review ,L N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement(1)5t...L.i. S152.500 was budgeted for this purchase. and FY08 funds Approved By: Financi Director have already been encumbered 643-422-224-511 $11,063.81 644-422-223-511 $137.293 90 Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION In concurrence with the Public Works Director, the Purchasing Agent recommends that the award be made to TW Mobile Engineering Technologies, Inc., and that authority be given to the Purchasing Agent to issue resutting purchase order BOARD / COMMIS‘ N RECOMMENDATION not applicable ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Resolution A.200 (Rev 7,03) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AWARDING A CONTRACT TO TW MOBILE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., FOR THE OUTFITTING OF TEN POLICE CARS AND ONE ANIMAL CONTROL TRUCK IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $148,357.71 WHEREAS, the City purchased ten 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors, and one Ford F250 Animal Control Truck; and WHEREAS, before these vehicles can be put into service, they require specialized outfitting or "build-up", which includes the installation of lightbars, sirens, flashers, prisoner seats/partitions, weapon/computer mounts radio equipment, graphics, etc ; and WHEREAS, on June 19, 2008, seven bids were publicly opened, examined, and declared for the specialized alterations for ten 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors, and one Ford F250 Animal Control Truck. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby awards the contract in the amount of $148,357.71 for the specialized outfitting of ten 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors, and one Ford F250 Animal Control Truck to the lowest responsive, responsible bidder, to wit: TW MOBILE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the payment of $148,357.71 to TW Mobile Engineering Technologies, Inc. for the specialized outfitting of ten 2008 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors, and one Ford F250 Animal Control Truck. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R Della, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 10 MEETING DATE July 15_ ?00R AGENDA ITEM NO. rrEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council confirming and approving the Diagram and Assessment Engineer's Report and providing for the levy of the Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. I - (Mile of Cars). PREPARED BY C\ DEPARTMENT Patricia Beard (ext. 4255) Redevelopment Division Redevelopment Manager Strategic Action Plan 4d EXPLANATION Lhc Engineer's Report calculates the annual cost to he assessed to each property owner located within the District. The amounts provided in the report are intended to provide various improvements to the district including median improvements; frontage improvements; general plan maintenance; irrigation system maintenance; street furniture maintenance; electrical system maintenance; street cleaning/ maintenance; street signage; and other incidentals. The County of San Diego Auditor and Controller will collect fees as part of the annual property tax roll procedures. Upon collection, the funds will then be disbursed to the City. This Resolution confirms and approves the Assessment Diagram and Engineers Report and provides for the Icvy of the Annual Assessment for I.andscape Maintenance District No. 1 - Mile of Cars. } Environmental Review N/,\ Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Council Adopt the Resolution of the City Council confirming and approving the Diagram and Assessment Engineer's Report and providing for the levy of the Annual Assessment for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 - (Mile of Cars). ATTACHMENTS 1. Engineer's Report 2. Assessment 3. Diagram Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO.2008 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT, AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 - MILE OF CARS (COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT) TO FUND ENHANCED MEDIAN AND FRONTAGE IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION, PAINTED CROSSWALKS AND COLORED CONCRETE HARDSCAPE, AND ONGOING MAINTENANCE FOR GRAPHIC PANELS, BANNERS, SIGNAGE, AND STREET FURNITURE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of National City, pursuant to the terms of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972" as set forth in Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "1972 Act") and Article XIID of the Constitution of the State of California ("Article XIID"), by previous Resolution, has obtained an Assessment Engineer's Report ("Report") for the annual levy of assessments within a special maintenance distract designated as Landscape Maintenance District No 1 - Mile of Cars, ("Maintenance District"), and WHEREAS, the Report has been presented to the City Council as required by the 1972 Act and Article XIID, and as previously directed by Resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the Report, and is satisfied with each and all the items and documents as set forth therein, including the assessments, which are apportioned based on the special benefits received from the improvements to be maintained within the Maintenance District. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City as follows: RECITALS Section 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. PROCEDURES Section 2. That the Report as presented consists of the following: A Plans and specifications describing the general nature, location, and improvements to be maintained within the Maintenance District, B. An estimate of the cost of the maintenance of the improvements for the Maintenance District within the fiscal year; C A site map of the Maintenance District, illustrating the boundaries and properties that shall be assessed; and D. Estimated costs of the maintenance of improvements, including the net amount upon all assessable Tots within the Maintenance District in proportion to the special benefits received Resolution No 2008 — July 15, 2008 Page 2 The City Council hereby finds that the procedures for the levy of property assessments have been undertaken pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIID, and that the assessments for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 have increased based upon the authorized annual escalation, as specified in the Report. DETERMINATION AND CONFIRMATION Section 3. Based on the Report, herein included as Exhibit "A", and the testimony and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following findings pertaining to the assessments' A. The proportionate special benefit derived by each assessed lot has been established in relation to the full cost for the annual operations and maintenance of the Maintenance District; B The assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit upon each assessed lot, C. Only the special benefits have been assessed. The assessments for Fiscal Year 2008-2009 have been approved and levied upon the assessable Tots within the Maintenance District in the amounts set forth in the Report. ORDERING OF MAINTENANCE Section 4. The City Council hereby orders that the maintenance work for the Maintenance District be completed, as set forth in the Report FILING WITH CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER Section 5 The assessment for the Maintenance District shall be filed in the office of the City Clerk, including a certified copy with the Office of the City Engineer. Said assessments shall be available for public inspection. FILING WITH COUNTY AUDITOR Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to file a certified copy of the assessments with the County Auditor. Said filing shall be made no later than August 10, 2008. ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL Section 7. After filing the assessments, the County Auditor shall enter into the County Assessment Roll the amount assessed upon each assessable lot, as set forth in the Report COLLECTION AND PAYMENT Section 7. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and manner that the County taxes are collected. and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of the County taxes shall also apply to the assessments for the Maintenance District. Resolution No 2008 — July 15, 2008 Page 3 FISCAL YEAR Section 8. The assessments for the Maintenance District shall cover the fiscal year beginning on July 1, 2008, and ending on June 30, 2009. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008 Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney Attachment "1" THIRTEENTH AMENDED ENGINEER'S REPORT LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (MILE OF CARS) City ol'National City, California (Pursuant to the landscaping and iighting Act of 1972) In 1995, the City Council of the City of National City. California, adopted a Resolution ordering the preparation and tiling of an Engineer's "Report" pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being i>ivision 12, Par-t 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. commencing with Section 22500 (the "Act"), for purposes of authorizing the levy of special assessments for certain maintenance work in a special assessment district known and designated as Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Mile of Cars) (hereinafter referred to as the "i>istrict"). An Engineer's Report dated February 15, 1995, was prepared and submitted as ordered by the legislative body. Following the date of the. Engineer's Report certain changes were made to the project. Such changes were described in the First Amended Engineer's Report dated August 1, 1996 and in the Second Amended Engineer's Report dated July 31. 1997. Since that time. the hndgct and assessment schedule have been reviewed, and an Amended Engineer's Report has been prepared each year. The most recent Engineer's report was the Twelfth Amended Engineer's Report dated June 7, 2(K)7. Based on an analysis of expenditures, adjustments are now necessary to the cost estimates and assessment schedule. This "Thirteenth Amended Engineers Report", is prepared and submitted in four parts. consisting of the following: Part I. Plans and Specifications. The plans and specifications describe the general nature, location and extent of the proposed improvements to he maintained and the maintenance to he performed. The plans and specifications are unchanged frurn the Twelfth Amended Engineer's Report. Part I1. Cost Estimate. The cost estimate includes all costs relating to maintaining the improvements for the next fiscal year, including appropriate incidental expenses. The cost estimate is based on actual as well as anticipated future expenditures. Part Ill. Assessment Diagram. The Assessment Diagram indicates the exterior boundaries of the District. as well as setting forth each individual lot or parcel. Each parcel is identified by a distinctive number or letter and the lines and dimensions of each lot conform to those as shown on the latest County Assessor's map. The Assessment Diagram is unchanged from the Twelfth Amended Engineer's Report. Part iV. Assessment Schedule. The assessment schedule sets forth the net amount to be assessed upon all parcels and lands within the District, describing each lot or parcel by reference to a specific number, and assessing the net amount upon the lots in proportion to the hcnefits to be received by each lot or parcel as shown on the above referenced diagram. All lots and parcels of land known as public property, as defined under Section 22663 of the Act, have hecn omitted and are exempt from any assessment under these proceedings. This report is applicable for the maintenance of improvements within the district for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008 and ending June 30. 2009. ilated: June 3. 2008 Nasland Engineering Assessment Engineer ( 'it v of National ( 'it y State of ('alifomia Attachment 2 PART I Plans and Specifications The plans and specifications for the works of improvements and the maintenance thereof are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, available for public inspection. The plans and specifications show the general nature, location and extent of the proposed improvements to he maintained and the maintcmu1ee to be. performed. A general description of the works of improvement to he maintained under these proceedings are described as follows: 1. Median Improvements: • Landscape planting and irrigation • Colored concrete hardscape • Lighting system • Graphic panels, banners and signage • Painted crosswalks • Identification sign at 23rd Street and McKinley Avenue. 2. Frontage Improvements • Improvements to parkways on both sides of National City Boulevard between 18th Stieet and 33rd Street. • Landscape planting and irrigation • Colored concrete sidewalks and mow curbs • Street furniture A general description of the maintenance to be perforated on such improvements is described as fol lows: I. Cieneral Plant Maintenance • Mowing, trinuning, pruning and weeding • Watering. including water usage • Fcrtilicing • Plant replacement • Periodic skinning of palm trees Maintenance of Irrigation System • Adjustment of timers • Repair/replacement of worn-out. stolen or malfunctioning equipment 3. Periodic restripint'. of decorative crosswalks 4. Periodic repainting of metal benches and trash teecptacles 5. Periodic repainting and repair of light poles. graphic panels, signace and other miscellaneous equipment 6. Maintenance of electrical system htilh replacement Repair/replacement of worn out or malfunctioning equipment Electrical energy charges 7. Litter removal 8. Trash pick-up 9. Other repairs of damage caused by vandalism and/or traffic accidents '3 PART11 Cost Estimate for FY 200 - 2009 The estimated total costs for maintenance of the improvements are those as hereinafter set forth below. For details regarding the estimated cost of animal maintenance refer to the attached Exhibit Median Frontage Improvements Improvements Cost of Annual Maintenance $71.216.67 $57,083.:33 Incidentals: A. Administration 300.00 300.00 13. Advertising 2()0.00 20000 C. Legal Fees 100.00 100.00 1). Engineering 700.(X) 500.(X) Total Incidentals 1.300.00 1, 100.00 Total Estimated Annual Cost 72,516.67 58,183.33 Surplus or Deficit t10_00 00_00 NET ANNUAL ASSESSMENT S72.5116.67 $58.183.33 PART 111 Assessment Diagram The Assessment Diagram sets forth (a) the exterior boundaries of the District and (b) the lines of each lot or parcel of land within the District. The Assessment Diagram further identifies each lot or parcel by a distinctive number or letter. For a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of any lot or parcel, reference is made to the County Assessor's Map applicable for the next fiscal year, which Wrap shall govern for all details concerning the lines and dimensions of such Tots or parcels. A copy of the Assessment Diagram is attached hereto, rcterenced and incorporated. 5 PART IV Assessment Schedule 1, an authorized representative (lithe duly appointed Assessment Engineer. by virtue of the power vested pursuant to the Act, and by ordct of the legislative body. hereby make the following assessment to cover the estimated costs and expenses for the maintenance within the District for the next fiscal year. Said costs and expenses arc generally as follows: Median Frontage Improvements Improvements Cost of Annual Maintenance (Exhibit B) $71,216.67 $57,083.33 Incidental Expenses 1.3(10.00 I.100.(N) Total Costs 72,516.67 58.183.33 Surplus/Deficit 0.00 0.00 Balance to Assessment 72.516.67 58,18 3.33 1 do hereby assess and apportion the net amount of the costs and expenses upon the several parcels of land within the District liable therefor and benefited thereby, in proportion to the estimated benefits that each parcel receives, respectively, from the maintenance work, and said parcels are hereinafter numbered and set forth to correspond with the numbers as they appear on the attached assessment Diagram and the County Assessment Roll. The Assessment Schedule refers to the County Assessor's Maps for a description ut the lots or parcels, and said Maps shall govern kw all details concerning the description of the Lots or parcels. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands has been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits received from each parcel, and in my opinion, said costs and expenses have been apportioned in direct relationship to the benefits received from the improvements to be maintained. For a more specific statement as to the method and formula for the spread of the assessments, reference is made to the following list of annual assessments, and for particulars as to the formula for the allocation of the costs. reference is made to the Method and Formula of Assessment Spread attached hereto as Exhibit "A" The assessments <ue those as confirmed in Column 1, unless a different figure appears in Column II. as modified. 1 11 Assesment Assessor's Parcel Amount of Assessment Number Number Assessment as Confirmed 1 560-210-01 $ 1.849.76 2 560- 210-04 2.441.69 3 56(1-21(1-42 443.94 4 560-210-41 7.39.91 5 560-210-40 3122.40 6 560-261-08 3,995.49 7 560-271-14 1,405.82 R 560-271-07 1.109.86 9 560-271-09 739.91 10 560-271-15 1.479.81 11 560 330-03 8,74 5.69 12 562-021-01 1,479.81 13 562-021-07 2,367.70 14 562-031-14 2,367.70 15 562-031-13 1,627.79 16 562-090-06 3,995.49 17 562-100-14 1,997.75 18 562-1 l N 1-13 1.997.75 19 562-160-07 4,439.44 20 562-180-32 1.213.44 21 562-180-33 1.879.36 22 562-251-37 2,989.22 23 562-251-38 2.471.2R 21 562-252-15 4,883.38 25 562-321-07 2.693.26 26 (Parcel owned by ('iry) 0.00 27 562-330-42 1.124.66 28 562-330-35 3,684.73 29 562-220-32 4.646.61 30 562-220-31 2,293.71 31 562-220-13 3,403.57 32 562-220-11 816.90 33 562-150-13 3.092.81 34 562-340-09 4.439.44 35 562-340-48 6.451.98 36 562-340-47 2.426.89 37 562-34(1-7(1 4.439.44 38 562-340-69 4.291.•15 39 562- 340- 50 4.4 39.41 40 562-340-49 4,306.25 41 560-393-04 7.103.10 42 560- 393-03 2.07 I.74 43 560-204-02 2.07 I.71 44 560-204-04 2.811.61 45 560-203-03 4.306.25 46 567- 30-43 0.00 Total $ 130.700.00 This Assessment has been prepared pursuant to the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972". 'the net amount to he assessed upon the lands and parcels within the boundaries of the District has been spread and apportioned in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, and in my opinion the costs and expenses have been assessed in direct relationship to the benefits received from the maintenance of the improvements. Dated: June 3, 2008 Nasland Engineering 4 Assessment Engineer City of National City State of California A copy of said Assessment Roll and Engincer's Report was filed in the Office of the Secretary and the Superintendent of Streets on the day of . 2008, City Clerk City of National City State of California Superintendent of Streets of National City State of California Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the Engineer's Report was made on the day of 2008 by adoption of Resolution No. by the City Counci I. City Clerk City of National City State of California EXHIBIT "A" METHOD AND FORMULA Of ASSESSMENT SPRI-:AI) The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments. :is levied pursuant to the provisions of the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", must be based on the benefit that the properties receive from the improvements to he maintained. The statute does not specify the method or formula that should he used in any special assessment district proceedings. The responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is appointed for the purpose of snaking an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment obligation. For these proceedings. the City has retained the services of Nasland Engineering. IDENTIFY T'H I Kh:N F:F'IT First. it is necessary to identify the benefit that the improvements to he maintained will render to the properties within the boundaries of the District. The improvements significantly improve the visual appearance of the strcetscape, making the Mile of Cars a more enjoyable and desirable location for customers. The special signage and lighting provide a unifying theme, benefiting all of the properties within the District. APPORTIONMENT OF COSTS In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the property owners receive a special and direct benefit distinguished from that of the general public. In this ease, an in-depth analysis was made, and several factors are being used in the final method and spread and assessment. All of the improvements are intended to he of direct benefit to ptopenics within the District. These improvements require significantly more inaintcnance than normally provided by the City. It is therefore appropriate that the properties receiving the benefit he assessed for the additional cost. There are generally two categories of improvements to he maintained by the District. T1ie• median improvements benefit all properties within the District. The improvements to the parkway (referred to herein as Frontage Improvements) benefit those properties which they ahut. This specific method of spreading the assessment is described below: 1. The total cost for maintenance of the median improvements is apportioned to all parcels in the District hased on the frontage of each parcel on National City Boulevard. except as noted below. 2 Parcel 26 (APN 562-321-08) is owned by the City of National City. not subject to assessment. 3. Parcel 32 (APN 562-220-1I) has no frontage on National City Boulevard, hut will benefit from the median improvements. This parcel is assessed for median improvements as if it had a frontarc of 100 rect. 4. I11c total cost for maintenance of the Frontage improvements is apportioned to all parcels in the District except Parcel 32 (AI'N 562-220- 11). based on the liunta,,c of each such parcel un National City Boulevard. The frontage of each parcel is determined from current assessor's maps for the County of San Diego. State of California. All frontage dimensions have been rounded to the nearest foot. FUTURE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENT IN ASSESSMENT The annual assessment to be levied on all properties within the district in fiscal year 2009-2010 and thereafter shall be subject to an annual escalation of up to 10% based upon actual and anticipated expenditures. if the annual assessment in any fiscal year is proposed to he increased by an amount which would be in excess of the amount authorized pursuant to the application of the above formula, such annual assessment shall be considered a "new or increased assessment" as such term is used in Government Code Section 54954.6. In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the ahove-referenced District have been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the improvements to he maintained. Dated: June ;, 2(XJ8 Naslaud Engineering Assessment Engineer City of National City State of California lv EXIIIBIT "B" ESTIMATED COST OF AN MJAI. MATNTENAN(] 171' 2008-2009 1. 1.awn planting care 2. Median planting care 3. Palm tree maintenance 4. Water usage 5. Refurbishment of graphics panels 6. General maintenance of electrical system 7. Electrical usage S. Refurbishment of decorative crosswalks 8 Miscellaneous Median Frontage Improvements 1 mprovements 0.00 $ 31,933.33 $ 15,966.67 0.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 5,700.00 $ 18.00().0) $ 18.000.00 $ 12,000.00 0.00 $ 6.500.00 0.00 $ 9,000.00 0.00 $ 1.800.(x) S 1.200.00 $ 250.00 $ 250.00 'I'OTA L: $69,216.67 $57.083.33 JI •(rn '099 •.trn '. (1;, .I�. .. ^ on(r O -.I ..p•.q•.(! n .((i n. n4 1105 J•p •r ♦F•Il. J •.T ••'elY•(', .•, �r'I S•'C .L5(SSY(' 4 p•rnm • •( •Y .l( or t•f .lr'a (. �•(_ C•. (r_ •sV ap•I••-:J .Irr,.: ♦f: ♦r••, f•c, r•Yr.11 ) 1. .♦r:.q ' t, - C. rw• t5,' '••Ja• C. Iuiy •.73.u4., V•CPau v•n[_ •- 199. 0 •,fee.FV• .5 ( •5.( P(C •CI, .9•,0(„r (( 5rs7!t$ Cr $a,0 13. P((••.'C( 5u•C( t)•n• au-pr. - •5iR .•sS•,•r :rC .(..•..\•., O. ml •SXS59•I.r, O..Oau r• '\nc ' Y Tle •.• •1•t )'•(59,1\, ✓.� CC' JY(w •\ fr(rll •,•5 n.•yi: •., V n--. n .•(-•5p•I• nrCC(R.• U n: f)rr,'- Cr S♦. (.1 .J'C.r.. r(:w\, e( •:C CC:. r. (r W. r,rr AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (MILE OF CARS) ( CITY OF NATIONAL CfTY COUNTY OF SAN DIEOO STATE OF CALIFORNIA '25 'r(.. C.0• '(5 NATIONAL )9 o[ CM/ r) 5.5-204 .)4 w eOULEVA'J .•--2C•-r2 Seo- •:'•05 — (43) (.2) ;el 5.0 • :9.'.. rIC SHEET 1 OF 3 SHEETS `to) Q REVISED 8-1-96 REVISED 6-11-97 REVISED 6-19-02 REVISED 6-09-03 REVISED 5-26-04 . r(s,C9 I((1... ♦•. '4 : ,,.,♦(. (. •.-. ;:, 95(^Ir• C04[.t Cr'a '55iT'5'•••• a5yoe• .11L NA3L. ND [NC LLNii-( NOTE CRICIN.4L SHEET SIZE 18' x 26' NE JOB No 105 I48 £ luawy3ey ••L'3 •0, 9 AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (MILE OF CARS) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COL;r4TY OF SAN DIEGO STATE OF CALIFORNIA o • ; Ij PJA13NAj CT!' 1300 .EVARD 140) ••,' 09 I 562- 1,- .• ''0 L r 137; SHEET 2 Cr' SHEETS J I 562. (t7, :5 NA T1C+IAL CM( soul, ARD 6. , 36 REVISED 8-1-96 REVISED 6-11-97 REVISED 6-I9-02 REVISED 6-09-03 REVISED 5-26-04 NOE ORGI"^t_ SHEET 512f 25' 35 •C, • • • r : 0•••••• • :Or' Al”1" s• “ps , ,,, • .• 5 NE JC2 No 105-149 r ' I .62 'E. Cr -- - -. •cc 567 '• C� 134) AMENDED ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM OF LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 (MILE OF CARS) CITY OF NATIONAL CfTY COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 562-'t_ ) 1 120) / 1 1 LI- T 1 (---, 1 1 (2i1 1,—' y,7-,8.-.• 1 1 5•:.25, 1' 1 1 —_r 1 gANsPORTAT1or1 A,c &E L 5•:-770-'1 582-220-3' (a) (V.V.' Cr,'i. • 'r.5_V S .•'S 'r0 S"r•r• •Mry• �C +tu i5r ,rll nut• " •51155'• • P•gr(l uu5 'OR oc(r(n- [Yu(,rup.6 1.8t •'.r i% r•a '261 a SHEET 3 CF 3 SHEET / riEVISED 8-1-96 NEVISED 6-11-97 REVISED 6-19-02 REVISED 6-09-03 REVISED 5-26-04 NA.•LAI:1) NOTE OR:OINAL SHEE- SIZE 18' x 26' N E JOE' No. 105-149 City of National City, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 15.2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 11 fiEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council confirming and approving the Diagram and Assessment Engineer's Report and providing for the levy of the Annual Assessment in the Downtown National City Property Business improvement District (Morgan Square Community Benefit District) PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT Patricia Beard (ext. 4255)Redevelopment Division Redevelopment Manager Strategic Action Plan 4d EXPLANATION The Engineer's Report. required by Section 22622 of the Landscape Maintenance and Lighting Act of 1972, is the central document relative to the i.eyy of Assessments within The Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District ('`The District"). The Engineer's Report is contained in the Downtown National City Property Business improvement District Management District Plan. approved on April 30, 2004 by the City Council. All proceedings for the establishment of a levy of assessment for the District will comply with the provisions of Proposition 218, approved by voters on November 5. 1996. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION City Council Adopt the Resolution of the City Council confirming and approving the Diagram and Assessment Engineer's Report and providing for the levy of the Annual Assessment in the Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District IATTACHMENTS 1. Engineer's Report 2. Diagram L. 3. Assessment Resolution No. A-200 (9/80) RESOLUTION NO.2008 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL CONFIRMING AND APPROVING THE DIAGRAM AND THE ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN THE DOWNTOWN NATIONAL CITY PROPERTY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT (MORGAN SQUARE COMMUNITY BENEFIT DISTRICT) WHEREAS, the Property and Business Improvement District Law of 1994, Part 7 of Division 18 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 36600 (the "Law"), authorizes cities and counties to establish, for up to five years initially, property and business improvement districts ("PBID") to promote the economic revitalization and physical maintenance of business districts; and WHEREAS, the Law authorizes cities to levy and collect assessments on real property within such districts for the purpose of providing improvements and promoting activities that specially benefit real property within such districts; and WHEREAS, Articles XIII C and XIII D of the California Constitution and Section 53753 of the California Government Code impose certain procedural and substantive requirements relating to the levy of new or increased assessments: and WHEREAS, in March, 2004, a written petition was submitted by property owners within Downtown National City requesting that the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (CDC) initiate proceedings pursuant to the Law to establish the Downtown National City Management District for a five (5) year period; and WHEREAS, such petition was signed by property owners in the proposed district who will pay more than fifty percent (50%) of the assessments proposed to be levied; and WHEREAS, a Management District Plan entitled the Downtown National City Management District Plan (the "Management District Plan") and a District Assessment Engineer's Report were prepared and submitted to the City Clerk, containing all of the information required by Section 36622 of the Law, including a description of the boundaries of the district, the improvements and activities proposed for the district, and the cost of such improvements and activities; and WHEREAS, the CDC established, for five years, the Downtown National City Management District (the "District") and levied and collected assessments against lots and parcels of real property within the District, commencing with fiscal year 20004-05: and WHEREAS, the CDC approved the Management District Plan, which is on file in the office of the City Clerk and available for public review during normal business hours; and WHEREAS, the boundaries of the proposed District are included in the Management District Plan; and WHEREAS, the proposed activities for the District include streetscape, sidewalk, parkway and street furniture maintenance, repair and replacement including but not limited to trees, sidewalk pavement, sidewalk bollards, street furniture, trash receptacles and street lights, as well as periodic landscape maintenance and steam cleaning services which benefit businesses and real property located in the District, and Resolution No. 2008 — July 15, 2008 Page 2 WHEREAS, the assessment proposed to be levied and collected for fiscal year 2008-09 is $240,688.64, which was the same assessment amount levied for fiscal year 2007- 2008. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of City of National City declares as follows: RECITALS Section 1 The above recitals are all true and correct PROCEDURES Section 2. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the procedures for the consideration of the levy of the annual assessment have been undertaken in accordance with both the Act and Article XIII D in as much as the proposed assessments for the Fiscal Year 2008-09 are not proposed to be increased over the assessment previously authorized to be levied DETERMINATION AND CONFIRMATION Section 3. The final assessment for the proceedings, as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report and the diagram are herby approved and confirmed. Based upon the Assessment Engineer's Report and the diagram, attached hereto as Exhibits "A" and "B", respectively, and upon the testimony and other evidence presented at the public hearing, the City Council hereby makes the following determinations regarding the assessments proposed to be imposed: A. The proportionate special benefit derived by each individual parcel assessed has been determined in relationship to the entirety of the cost of the operations and maintenance expenses. B. The assessments do not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on each parcel. C. Only the special benefits have been assessed. The assessments for the District contained in the assessment attached hereto as Exhibit "C" for the next fiscal year are hereby confirmed and levied upon the respective lots or parcels in the District in the amounts as set forth in the assessment attached hereto as Exhibit "C". ORDERING OF MAINTENANCE Section 4. The public interest and convenience requires, and this legislative body does hereby order the maintenance work to be made and performed as said maintenance work is set forth in the Assessment Engineer's Report and as previously declared and set forth in the Resolution of Intention. Resolution No. 2008 - July 15, 2008 Page 3 FILING WITH CITY CLERK AND CITY ENGINEER Section 5. The above -referenced diagram and assessment shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk, with certified copy to be filed in the Office of the City Engineer. Said diagram and assessment and the certified copy thereof, shall be open for public inspection. FILING WITH THE COUNTY AUDITOR Section 6. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no later than the August 10, 2008. ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL Section 7. After the filing of the diagram and assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of the land the amount assessed there upon, as shown in the assessment. COLLECTION AND PAYMENT Section 8. The assessments shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected, and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of the County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the assessments. FISCAL YEAR Section 9. The assessments as above authorized and levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and are related to the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2008 and ending June 30, 2009. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney ATTACHMENT 1 Edward Henning& Associates 1JRRAN REVTTALIZATJON • FUNDING Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District CITY OF NATIONAL CITY - CALIFORNIA DISTRICT ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT Prepared by Edward V Henning, California Registered Professional Engineer It 26549 Edward Henning & Associates Phelan California June 1, 2004 1333o But iviuere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (76o) 86R-Q $ • (fax) (76o) 868 6.190 • nirec12@earthlink.net ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Edward llenning& Associates URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING DISTRICT ASSESSMENT ENGINEER'S REPORT To Whom 11 May Concern: 1 hereby certify to the best of rely professional knowledge and experience that each of the identified benefiting properties located within the proposed Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District will receive a special benefit over and above the benefits conferred on lbc public at large and that the amount of the proposed assessment is proportional to, and no greater than the benefits conferred on each respective property. eeitt.:41/ Prepareby Edward V. Henning, California Registered Professional Engineer tl 26549 a Edward V. I1 PPE 426549 June 1, 2004 Date (NOT VALID WITHOUT ENRO.W /) CERTIFICA77ON SFAL. A NI) SIGNATURE !HERE) Iatrodne ion This report shall serve as the "detailed engineer's report" required by Section 4(b) of Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218) to support the benefit property assessments proposed to be levied within the Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District (Downtown National City PB10) in the City of National City, California being established for a five year period. The discussion and analysis contained within constitutes the required "nexus" of rationale between assessment amounts levied and special benefits derived by properties within the Downtown National City PBID. NOTE 1: The terminology "identified benefiting parcel" or "property" is used throughout this report pursuant to SB 919 - "Proposition 218 Ouwibus Implementation Act" which clarified portions of Prop 218. It provides the Engineer and District Consultant with the ability to actually identify individual parcels which will benefit directly either in whole or in part from the proposed District funded programs and improvements and does not imply that all parcels receive assessable benefits . t333o Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (76o) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net Edward Henning & Associates 11RBAN REVffAL1ZATION • FUNDING Backzround The Downtown National City PBID is a property -based benefit assessment type distrid being established pursuant to Section 36600 et seq. of the California Streets and Itighways Code, also known as the Property and Business Improvement District law of 1994 (the "Act). Due to the benefit assessment nature of assessments levied within a PBID, district program costs are to be distributed amongst all identified benefiting properties based on the proportional amount of program benefit each property is expected to derive from the assessments collecid!. Within the Act, frequent references arc made to the concept of relative "benefit' received from PBID programs and activities versus amount of assessment paid. Only those properties expected to drive special benefits from PBID funded programs and activities may bc rise scd and only in an amount proportional to the relative benefits expected to be received. The method used to determine benefits derived by each identified property within a PR11) begins with the selection of a suitable and tangible basic benefit unit. For property related services, such as those proposed in the Downtown National City Pf31D, the benefit moil may bc nrcasrucxd in lunar feet of street frontage or pared sue in square feet or bnilding sate in square feel or number of building floors or proximity to major corridors in average linear feet or any combination of these factors. Quantity takeoffs for each parcel are then measured or otherwise ascertained. From these figures, the amount of benefit units to be assigned to each property can be ailarlated. Special circumstances such as unique geography, land uses, development constraints etc. are carefully reviewed relative to specific programs and improvements to be funded by the l'fltl) in order to determine any levels of diminished benefit which may apply on a parcel by parcel or categorical basis. Based on the factors described above such as geography and nature of programs and activities proposed, an assessment formula is developed which is derived from a singular or composite basic benefit unit factor or factors. Within the assc s rent formula, different factors may be assigned different "weights" or percxotage of values. Next, ail program and activity costs, including incidental costs, district administration, ancillary programs, and volunteer and cornped resource and material credits are estimated. it is noted, as stipulated in Proposition 2I8, and now required of all property basal assessment districts, indirect and general benefits may not be incorporated into the assessment formula and levied on the district properties; only dust or "special" benefits and costs may be considered Indirect or general benefit costs must be calculated and factored out of the assessment cost basis to prrxhrce a "net" cost figure. bi addition, Proposition 218 uo forger exempts government owned property from paying benefit assessments and these properties must be factored into the assessment roll if special benefit is determined to be coirfuied upon such properties 2 13336 But/einem Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868 6490 • ntredz(teartbl'urk.net Edward Henning & Associates URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING From this, the value of a basic benefit unit or "basic net unit cost" can be computed by dividing the total arnomd of estimated net program costs by the total number of benefit units. The amount of assessment for each parcel can be computed at this time by multiplying the Net Unit Cost times the number of Basic Benefit Units per parcel. This is known as "spteading the assessment" or tbe "assessment spread" in that all costs are allocated proportionally or "spread" amongst all properties within the PBID. The method and basis of spreading program costs varies front one PBID to another based on local geographic conditions, types of programs and activities proposed, and size and development complexity of the district PBIDs may require secondary benefit zones to be identified to allow for a tiered assessment formula for variable or "stepped -dawn" benefits derived. Supplemental Proposition 218 Procedures and Requirements Proposition 218, approved by the voters of California in November of 1996, adds a supplemental array of procedures and requirements to be carried out prior to levying a property -based assessment like the Downtown National City PRID. These requirements are in addition to requirements imposed by State and local assessment enabling laws. These requirements were "Chaptcrcd" into law as Article XIIID of the California Constitution and then further clarified by the Proposition 218 Omnibus Legislation in 1997 chaptercd in section 53750 et sect of the California Government (ode Since Prop 218 pnnisions Will affect al) subsequent calculations to be made in laying end the final property assessment roll for the Downtown National City P1310, Prop 218 requirements will be taken into account first The key provisions of Prop 218 along with a description of bow the Downtown National City PBII) complies with each of these provisions is delineated below. (Note: All section references below pertain to Article XIII of tbe California Constitution): Findint 1. From Section 4(a): "Identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred epos them and open which an assessment will be imposed" There are 153 "identified" individual parcels within the Downtown National City PBID which will all derive sonie level of special benefit from the proposed District programs and activities. These parcels are shown on the Boundary Map within the Management District Plan and are listed as an attachment to the Plan - identified by assessor parcel number and site address. Two bent zones have been identified within the District which generally includes all properties along and surrounding the National City Boulevard comdor train 2"" to 12th and the 8" Street corridor how the freeway to A Avenue. 3 13330 Buttemcre Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6400 • mred2@earthlink.net Edward Henning & Associates URBAN REVITALIZATION - FUNDING Findini 2., From Section 4(a): "Separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred on parcel(s). Only special benefits are assessable. " As stipulated by Prop 218, assessment district programs and activities confer a combination of general and special benefits to district properties, but the only program benefits which can be funded through assessments arc those attributed to special property related benefits. 'Thus, a portion of the program costs must be considered attributable to general benefits and assigned a value. Conventional assessment engineering experience has found that general benefits within a given district typically average IQ% of the total adjusted costs with a 5% deviation. (Total adjusted oasts include actual proposed PBIU program coats plus any additional supplemental or matching program costs as well as applied credits from sources such as start up grants, Board/Couunirtre member service credits and spccialrzed assessment reductions/adjustments) There arc three coauuou methods for determining general and special benefit ratios within assessment districts (1)1 he parcel by parcel allocation method (2)'f7ie program/activity line item allocation method, and (3) The composite district overlay determinant method. The vast majority of Pf31f s in California have used Method N3, the composite district overlay determinant method which will be used for the Downtown National City 1'U11). Using empirical data from other PBIDs, a focused range for general benefits front 5-15% is used. Based on a composite of district criteria such as the shape of the t)owntowii National City PBII). the existence of two benefit zones, a three-four element as',sessment formula, the proximity all of district properties to the applicable program benefit zones, aid the nature of the proposed programs and activities, a specific' overlay" value of 5% is assigned to the general benefit portion of the total adjusted costs. This leaves a value of 95% assigned to special benefit related costs Since the total program cost is estimated at S265,572.01 (see Table 1 later in this Report), the maximum special benefit portion which can be recouped through property assessments, is S252,293.41. Remaining costs which are attributed to general benefits, will nod to be derived from other sources. (c.g. public/private matching grants, startup grants, startup volunteer credits or ongoing board member volunteer credits) .1 L3s,,o Ruttuut're Rd • Phelan CA 92$71 • (7tx0) 8G8 996;3 • (lax) (760) 868-6490 • mrcd2(earthlink.no Edward Henning & Associates URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING Findiit; 3. From Section 4(a): "(Determine) the proportionate special benefit derived by each parcel in relationship to the entirety of the. ---cost of public improvements) or the maintenance and operation expenses. ...or the cost of the property related service being provided The proportionate special benefit cost for each parcel is listed in an attachment to the Management I)ulrict Plan 'line individual percentages (i.e. proportionate relationship to the total special benefit related program and activity costs) were computed by dividing the individual parcel agent by the total program costs. Kadin!. 4. }'rota Section 4(a): "No assessment.-- shall exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on parcel(s)." Not only arc the proposed program costs reasonable due to the benefit of group purchasing and contracting which would be possible through the Downtown National City P1311), they are also considerably kss than other options considered by groups like the Downtown National City ['BID Formation Comnuttce. Findaa= 5. From Section 4(a): "Parcels. --.that are owned or used by any (public) agency shall not be exempt from assessment." Parcels within the District that are owned by public agcncic (i.e. City of National City, the Community Development Commission, Southwestern College etc) will also be assessed and at rates equivalent to private sector owned parcels. The "fair market value" of such public properties is identical to surrounding privately owned parcels and any increased values and benefits derived from MID programs and services would be similar for either pnblic or privately owned parcels, with or without improvements. lust as the costs and effects of blight are shared by both public and private properties, so are the rewards of dean and safe as well as district promotions and marketing programs. Since there is no compelling finding or evidence that such properties would tredve less direct benefit from the proposed MED programs and services than surrounding private parcels, the same assessment rates would be levied. runtime 6. From Section 4(b): "All assessments nest be supported by a detailed engineer's report prepared by a registered professional engineer certified by the State of California". This report shall serve as the "dctailat engineer's report" to support the benefit property assessments proposed to be levied wittun the Downtown National City PBID. 5 13'3;to Bi ttcrnt re Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (7(30) 868-99b3 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • nrred2@catthlitnk.net Edward Henning & Associates URBAN KI{VI I'Al.I7ATION • FUNDING Finding 7. From Section 4(c): "The amount of the proposed assessment for each parcel shall be calculated (along with) the total amount thereof chargeable to the entire district, the duration of such payments, the reason for such assessment and the basis upon which the amount of the proposed assessment was calculated." The individual and total parcel assessments anributable to special property benefits are shown on an attachment to the Management Districi Plan. T1te district and resultant assessment payments will continue for five years and may be renewed again at that time. The reasons (purposes) for the proposed assessments are outlined in the Management I)istrict Plan. The calculation basis of the proposed assessment for the MID is attributed in part to the specific amount of property size, building size and street frontage. Special Benefit and Assessment Analysis Step 1. Select "Basic Benefit Unit(s)" PBID assessment fornrulas typically are based on either property street frontage or parcel and budding size or location, all which can affect the amotmt of benefit conferred on a particular parcel and the propoi tionate assessment to be paid. The formula may base assessments on a single factor or a combination of factors. Basal on the nature of the program activities to be funded by the Downtown National City PBID, which relate to the proportionate amount of real estate (i.e land) leld in ownership, development intensity (i.c. building area) and properly street frontage as well as land use, it has been determined that the assessments for the PBID will be based proportionately on a combination of parcel size, building size, land use and street frontage. In addition a flat rate will be applied to single fancily residential (SFR) and residential condo units located on non -residentially zoned land. The "Basic Benefit Unit" will be expressed as a function of land square footage (Basic Benefit "A" Units), building area (tlasic Benefit "B" Units - further refined by land use) and linear feet of property frontage (Basic Benefit "C" Units). Based on the shape of the Downtown National City PBID, as well as the nature of the District program elements, it is determined that two benefit zones exist in which identified properties will gain a direct, albeit, proportionate degree of benefit bassi ou the respective amount of panel size, building size, land use and stn.-et frontage. Step 2. Quantify Total Basin Bent Units 'faking into account all identified benefiting propenres, there are 1,465.301 square feet of assessable parcel land area within the District, 442t,344 square feet of assessable building area and 21,744 linear feet of property street frontage In addition, there are 12 assessable single family/condo units Since the selected Basic Benefit Unit is based on a 6 1333o Buttemcre Rd • Phelau CA y�;t71 • (7t0) 868-096;1 • (fax) (76o) 868-6400 • nrrcd20icarthlink.net Edward I Ienning & Associates URBAN REVITAL17.ATION • FUNDING combination of parcel area, building area and street frontage, there arc, in turn, couespundiog amounts of Basic Benefit Units in the PBID as shown in Step 7 herein- The target weighted revenues from each formula component were 50% for land area, 30% for building area and 20% for street floatage. The final adjusted weights are 49% for land, 33% for building area, 17% for street frontage and 1% for SFR and condo flat rates. Further, the targeted weighted revenues for each Benefit Zone were 60% for Zone 1 and 40% for Zonc 2. The final adjusted weights are 61 %, fot Zonc 1 and 39% for Zonc 2 Step 3. Calculate Benefit Units for Each Property. The number of Benefit Units for each identified benefiting parcel within the Downtown National City PBID was computed from data extracted from City of National City, San Diego County and third party real estate data services property and land use records. These data sources delineate current land uses, prgxaty areas and dimensions of record for each tax parcel and are listed as an attachment to the Management District Plan. While it is understood that this data dots net represent legal field survey measurements or detailed title search of recorded land subdivision maps or building records, it does provide an acceptable basis for the propose of calculating property basal assessments. All respective property data being used for assessment computations has been provided to each property owner in the PBID for their review. All known or reported discrepancies or errors have been corrected. Step 4. Determine Assessment Formula For a District with a single Basic Benefit Unit with one Benefit Zone, the assessment formula would be the same for each identified benefiting property as follows: Number of Basic Benefit Units x Basic Unit Cost = PBID Assessment The Downtown National City PBID assessment is to be based on three Basic Benefit Unit factors; land square footage (Basic Benefit "A" Units), building area (Basic Benefit "B" Units) and linear feet of property frontage (Basic Benefit "C" Units). It has been determined that the assessment should be based partially on parcel size, building size and street frontage as follows: Zone 1 Assessment = ](No. of Benefit "A-1"Units x Basic "A -I" Unit Cost)] + [(No. of Benefit "B-1" Units x Basic"B-1" Unit Cost)] 1 I(No. of Benefit "C-1" Units x Basic "C-I" Unit Cost)] Zone 2. Assessment - I(No of Benefit "A-2"Units x Basic "A-2" Unit Cost)] + I(No of Benefit "13-2" Units x Basic "B-2" Unit C.osl)] r I(No of Benefit "C-2" Units x Basic "('-2" Unit ( ..ost)I 7 13330 Bnttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • turrcl2@Carthlink.net Edward klenning & Associates URBAN REV!TA1J'LA110N • FUNDING Note A: Benefit "B" Unit Costs vary based on land use as shown in Table 3 later in this report. Note B: Assessments for single family residential and residential condos are based on a fiat fee per unit as shown in Table 3. Step 5. l.stimate'fotal Program and Activity Costs 'Total estimated pined program and activity costs are shown below in Table 1. These cools include expenses for general as well as special benefits and relates' programs/activities. TABLE 1 Estimated Total Year 1 Program & Activity Costs (Special 'General Benefits) j Program/Activity i Year 1 j % 1 Public Rights of Way & Sidewalk Operations ! S1 73,000.00 65.1.4% District Identity/Streetscape Improvements I}. $14.000.00 5.27% ! �Adneinlstratlon/Cot purateOperations I S41,000.00 j 15.44% Contlne�ency/Reserve _ _ _1-_ 112,722.01 4.79% t _ Misc Costs (Credits) - $24,850.00 ! 9.369E j Total ! S265.572.01 1 100.00% Step 6., Separate General Bests from Special Benefits aid Related Costs (Prop 218) Total program and activity exits are estimated at S265,572 01 (see Table 1 above). General benefits arc factored at 5% of total (see Finding 2 on page 4 of this report) with special benefits set at 95%. Prop 218 limits the levy of property assessments to costs attributes, to special benefits only. The S% general benefit cost is computed to be S 13,27R.60 with a resultant 95% s-pe vial benefit limit couiputed at S252,293.41. This is the minimum amount of ,.,. revenue that can he derived from property osseSfinents from the subject PBID. The total amount of revenue proposed to he derived fiuw ('hill) assessments u S240,722 01 for Year 1, which is less than the special benefit limit of $252,291 41. Therefore. no Prop 218 adjustments need to be made to the proposed a'smeut formula. All program costs associated with genera, benefits will be derived from sotuces or aexhts other than t'Ii1U assessments as shown bclu.. rn'fable 7 8 13330 Butteiuere Rd - Phelan (A 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • mred2@Parthlink.net Edward Henning& Associates URBAN REVITALIZATION - FUNDING TABLE 2 Total Adjusted Year 1 Revenue (For Special + General Benefit Proitrams/Actirities) Funding Source _ Subtotal Revenue Me `PBID Assessments 1 S240.722.01 PBID Formation Pro -rated Credit/Year (S35,000 base) i $7.000.00 PBID formation Pro -Rated Volunteer Credit/Year (50% base) Annual Board/Volunteer Credit (35% base Admin) TOTAL ADJUSTED REVENUE $3, 500.00 S14,350.00 90.64% 2.64% 1 1.32%I 5.40% S265,572.01 100.0096 j Step 7. Caladate "Bask Unit Cost" (Special Benefits Only) With a Ycnr 1 budget of S240,720.01 (special benefit only), the Basic Unit Costs ("A", "B" and "C") from the Management Plan are - Basic Unit "A" Cost "B-a" Cost "B-b" Cost "13-c" ('ost "B-d" Cost r--• "B-e" Cost TABLE 3 Land Use Description All except SFR and condos Retail, hotels, motels, visitor Office, commercial, pkg struc. Benefit Zone 1 SO.0841/sf Benefit Zone 2 $0.0757/sf S0.1886/sf S0.1697/sf 50.1G9G/sf Industrial manufacturing _ _ 50.1696/sf lnstitntio government etc Residential 20+ units 50.1577/sf 50.1697/sf S0.1485/sf "B-f" Cost Residential 9-19 units SO.1485/sf $0.1697/sf 50.1578/sf 50.1485/sf B- C "B-h" Cost "B-i" Cost "C" Cost Residential 2-8 units Single family. residential Residential Condo All © .pt Slit and condos 50.1485/sf $240 flat rate S240 flat rate St.8264/LF 50,1485/sf 50.1485/sf $240 flat rate S240 flat rate S 1.8264/L.F Since the 1131D is manned for a five year term, maximum asses inents for futwe years (Years 2 tluouglu 5) must he set at the inception of the Pf3I1). A maximum annual flat rate increase of 5% may be imposed each year, subject to :uppmval by the P1313) Board 9 1333o Butiemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760) 868-9963 • (fax) (760) 868 6490 • mttt12gp 11Ihlink.net Edward Henning & Associates URBAN REVITALIZATION • I;UNITING Step 8. Spread the Accecswentc The resultant assessment spread calculations for each panel within the PBID arc shown in an attachment to the District Management Plan and were determined by applying the District qcsrcsinent formula to each identified benefiting property. 'I1,is list of all identified benefiting parcels in the PBll) delineates cash parcel and benefit units for property street frontage and parcel area. 10 13330 Built -mere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (76o) 868-9963 • (fax) (76o) 868-6490 • mred2@earthlink.net Edward Henning & Associates URBAN REVITALIZATION • FUNDING EDWARD FfENNING & ASSOCIATES Edward Henning and Associates is a multi -disciplined consulting firm offering a diverse range of community development and funding services focusing on downtown business districts and the unique problems and opportunities associated with center city areas, Types of services provided • Business Improvement District (BID & PBID) Formations, Modifications, Expansions, Updates • Prop 218 Assessment Engineering Analyses and Reports (Licensed Engineer) • Downtown Revitalization Plans/Redevelopment Planning and Implementation • Establish/Administer/Field Supervision for Rehabilitation Programs and Projects • Architectural Design Guidelines/ Sign Ordinances Partial list of agencies and clients represented • Town of Apple Valley • City of Beikcky • City of Buena Park • City of (udvcr City • City of Huntington Park • City of Huntington Beach • City of Los Angeles - Gateway to LAX - Historic Downtown Core - Hollywood District - McIrosr/Fairfax 1 archmont - Los Feliz - San Fernando Valley (6 arras) - San Vicente - Wilshire Center • City of Monterey Park • City of Napa • City of Newport Beach • City of Ontario (Downtown) • City of Oxnard • City of Pasadena • Placer County (Tahoe City) • City of San Francisco (Union Square) • City of Vacaville • City of Whittier • City of Yucaipa PBID Formation (Village) BID Formation (Downtown) BID Formation Analysis (Auto Row & Entertainment Corridor) 111D Formation (Downtown) BID Formation (Pacific Blvd) BID Formation (Auto Row District) PI111) Formation & Renewal (Prop 218 Compliance) PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance) PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance) PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance) PBID Formation & Renewal 1111) Formation PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance) Private Sector PR)D Formation Hybrid BID/PBID Formation BID Modification (Dowutown) MD Formation (Downtown) BID Advising BID Modification PBID Formation (Downtown) PBID Formation (Playhouse District) Citywide Tourist Improvement District (11D) PBUI Formation (Downtown) PBID Formation (Prop 218 Compliance) BID Formation (Downtown) Citywide Tourist Improvement DisUict Evahuttion (TID) BID Modification (Uptown) PBID Formation & Renewal(Uptown) I 13330 Buttemere Rd • Phelan CA 92371 • (760)8(.3 9963 • (fax) (760) 868-6490 • tnred2(1%earthlink.net q rrgCy MeNr rl, DOWNTOWN NATIONAL CITY PROPERTY BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT PARCELS TO BE ASSESSED 2008 APN 555.030.01.00 555-030-02.O0 555-030-03-00 555-030.04-00 555.030-05.00 555-030-06.00 555-03CC7-00 555.030-08.00 555.030.09.00 555-020.10.00 555-030.11-00 555 C30 12-03 555.030.13-03 555.03G-14.00 555-030.17-00 555-030.20.00 555 030.21.00 555-030.22.00 555-041 01-00 555-041.02-03 555.041.03-00 $55-041-04 C0 555-041-05.00 555.041-06-CO 555-041-G7.30 555.041-C8.00 555-041.09.00 555-041.10 00 555-042.10-00 555-042.15-00 555.042.17(-3 ANNUAL ASSESSMENT 524C CO $427 32 $0 00 5030 5240.00 5000 S240 00 $1 358 46 $278 41 5339 52 5270 50 5344.51 5262 92 $500.53 S1.C99.50 $4.997 45 53.644 29 56.609 58 5878 28 S472 48 S3.616 36 51,063 44 5570.74 5571.49 $694.46 5511 82 5511 82 51,206 28 51,080 70 53.104 82 53.458 95 ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL ANNUAL APN ASSESSMENT APN ASSESSMENT APN ASSESSMENT APN ASSESSMENT 555-042-18-00 57.001_77 555-052-34-00 5694.46 555-052-05-00 5649.75 556-052-06-00 5471.60 555-052-14-00 52,453.40 555-052.15.00 52.361.54 555-053.17-00 522.785 90 555-054.12-00 36.377 83 555-081-09-00 551024 555-081.10-00 $267 23 555-081.14.00 5396.50 555-081-15-00 5216.88 555 081.16-00 $695.37 555-081-17.00 31,992.94 555-082.01-0C 31.855 29 555-082.02-00 $24419 555.082-03-00 5527 88 555-082-04-00 $399 68 555-082-05.00 $1.137 98 555.082-06-00 5960.23 555-082.10-00 S1,533.33 555.082-11.00 54 097.40 555-085-01-00 555-085-02-00 555-085-03-00 555-085-04-00 555-085-05-00 $622 48 $240 00 3240 00 5484 11 52,797.35 555-085-06-00 555-085.07-00 555.113.04-00 555-113.05.00 555-113-08.00 565-113.11.00 555.113-12.00 555 113.13-00 555.114-01.00 555.114-02-00 555.114-03-00 555-114.04.00 555-114-05.00 555-114-06.00 555-114.07.00 555.114.11.00 555.114.12-00 555.114-13.00 556.101-01-00 556.101-02-00 556.101.1503 556.101.16-00 556-104-01.00 556-104-02.00 556104.18.00 556.210.25-00 556.210-2600 556.210.27-00 556-212-01-00 556.212-02-00 556.212-03C0 $187.37 $4.258 90 $808 87 5792 75 51,269 33 52,084 78 51,569.72 51.133.05 5240.00 $240.00 $215 59 5220 14 5452 48 5652.46 $1,151 '4 5330 42 51.594.28 $1,569 62 $1.614.58 51 81533 $5 492 84 52.276 33 $2.485 63 5240 00- 51.820 45 51.662.72 51,510.43 51,077.40 $240 00 5240 00 $496 74 556.212-04-00 556.212.05.00 556.212-06-00 556-212.07. 0 556-331-03-00 556-331-04-00 556-331-05-00 556-331-14.00 556.331.15-00 556.331.20-00 556.331.21.00 556-331-22-00 556331-23.0C 556.331.24-00 556.331.25-0C 556.332.20.00 556-332-21-00 658-332.22-00 556-332-23-00 556.332.24-00 556.333.15-00 556333.17.00 556333.18.00 556-334-19-00 556-334-20-00 556-334.21-00 556-334-22-00 5276 94 $419.14 $563.61 S754 77 5249 09 $505 91 $1.181 45 52,439 68 5926 31 5748.13 52,720 06 51255.39 $$66 21 $715.83 $3.133 35 $1.764 62 5535 59 5375 86 5253 70 51.409.83 52,626.38 54.907.21 5522.19 S2.101 81 $282 35 $41030 5452 14 r.C';:.V:.•:.ai' . � �- 'fix: 558471.16-00 556.47' .17.00 51,585 34 52,691 26 556-47 i -23-00 54.830 57 556-471.24.60 53,673 51 556-472.23•C0 52,019 79 5.56.472.24-00 5527 74 BEEMENEWN 556-472-27-00 8265.95 556-473-15.00 51.526.52 556.473.16-00 579275 556-473.17-00 5962.08 556.474-01-00 51.61056 556-474-02C0 5739 54 556-474-21-00 52.527 99 556-493-01.00 51.29C 96 556-493.04.00 5934 44 556.493-05-00 S240 00 556-553-01-00 569446 556.553.02.00 5357.75 556553-03-00 $439 23 556.553.04.00 5616.95 556-553-05-00 51.592.79 556.553.14-03 $1.324 56 556-553.16.00 $284 64 556-554.16-00 $4.415 42 556.554.17.00 56.245 33 556-554-18-00 51,195.18 556-554-19-00 S569 85 556554-20.00 $1,205.03 656.554-21.00 $1.568.79 538.634 63 50 03 $38.604 63 577,677.89 515.682 56 $61.995 33 $39.743 35 $0 00 539.743 35 539.183 49 52 809 07 $36,374 42 •,4tIp6paMt iiffigV4WWal rl ,b $45.479 28 53.056 70 $42.422 58 3240.688.64 Total Assessments ;21.548.3a Total Public Parcels ,jj19.140.31 Total A ments leas Public F £ iN3WH31/11V City of National City, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 12 ITEM TITLE Resolution approving an Addendum to Agreement between the City of National City and Constellation Property Group regarding $70,000 relocation costs for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local No. 29 Offices. PREPARED BY (� �( DEPARTMENT Patricia Beard (ext 4255) \\ t Redevelopment Division Redevelopment Manager Strategic Goals: 2, 5a EXPLANATION On October 6, 2006 the City and Constellation Property Group entered into an Agreement regarding relocation costs to move the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local No. 29 offices from a building within the Centro -Lumina -Revolution project site into new space at the former National City Library. The proposed addendum presented here for consideration would change the method of repayment of relocation costs to the City by Constellation. (Please see attached Background Report.) Environmental Review Not applicable Financial Statement The addendum would allow $25,171.50 to be credited against the $70,000 relocation costs and require the developer to pay 4.5-percent interest toward a pay- off date of June 15. 2010. (Please see attached Background Report.) Account No. 900744 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. ATTACHMENTS 1. Background report 2. Proposed Addendum to Agreement Resolution No. 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AN ADDENDUM TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND CONSTELLATION PROPERTY GROUP REGARDING RELOCATION COSTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LONGSHORE AND WAREHOUSE UNION LOCAL NO. 29 OFFICES WHEREAS, on October 3. 2006, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006- 212, approving an Agreement with Constellation Property Group for the payment of $70,000 to the City for the cost of tenant improvements to the former National City Public Library located at 41 East 12th Street to accommodate the relocation of the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local No. 29 offices; and WHEREAS, the City and Constellation Property Group desire to amend the Agreement to modify the method and timing of payment for the Constellation Property Group portion of costs of the relocation costs by allowing $25,171.50 to be credited against the $70,000 relocation costs and require the developer to pay 4.5 percent (4.5%) interest toward a pay-off date of June 15, 2010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute the Addendum to the Agreement between the City of National City and Constellation Property Group modifying the method and timing of payment for the Constellation Property Group portion of costs of the relocation costs by allowing $25,171.50 to be credited against the $70,000 relocation costs and require the developer to pay 4.5 percent (4.5%) interest toward a pay-off date of June 15. 2010. Said Addendum to Agreement is on file in the office of the City Clerk. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney ATTACIIMENT 1 BACKGROUND REPORT To develop the Centro, Lumina and Revolution projects on the blocks bounded by National City Boulevard, 11th Street, 12th Street and the planned A Avenue, extension, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union Local No. 29 ("Union") offices needed to be relocated from the project site. After an extensive site search and negotiations, the City, Constellation and the Union in October, 2006 agreed upon a portion of the former National City Library as the location for new Union offices. As part of that Agreement, Constellation agreed to pay the City $70,000 toward tenant improvements needed to create the new office location for the Union. According to the Original Agreement, Constellation was to have repaid the City in a lump payment after the construction contract had been let. Constellation has now asked the City to credit the hard cost portion of a recent tree donation and allow a payment over time with interest. Tree donation: On May 6, 2008 the City accepted a donation of 14 trees from Constellation valued at $71,171.50. The trees were relocated and replanted into City parks by the developer at a hard cost of $25,171.50. This hard cost is now being requested as a credit against the relocation costs for the Union. Payment of remaining costs: The remaining relocation costs are $44,828.50. The developer has agreed to pay a simple annual interest rate of 4.5 percent and wishes to make the payments in increments of $5,000 per payment commencing on June 15, 2009 and completing all payments, including interest, by no later than June 15, 2010. The interest rate requested by staff is an average earned on CDC investments during the past two years. ATTACHMENT 2 ADDENDUM TO AGREEN1H;NT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AND CONSTELLATION PROPERTY GROUP REGARDING RELOCATION COSTS FOR THE INTERNATIONAL. LONGSHORE ANI) WAREHOUSE UNION LOCAL NO. 29 OFFICES THIS ADDENDUM to Agreement Between the City of National City and Constellation Property Group, Regarding Relocation Costs for the International Longshore and Warehouse Union local No. 29 Offices (this "Addendum") is made and entered into as ofJune 17. 2008 (the "Effective Date"), by and between the City of National City, a public body, corporate and politic (the " ( :ity") and Constellation Property Group (NatCity 12'h) LP. a Delaware limited partnership ("CPG"). Recitals A. The City and CPG entered into that certain Agreement Between the City of National City and Constellation Property Group Regarding Relocation Costs for the International I .ongshore and Warehouse Union Local No. 29 Offices on October 6, 2006 (the "Original Agreement"). B. The City and CPG wish to amend the Original Agreement to modify the method and timing of payment for the CPG Portion of the Costs of the relocation of the hntemational Longshore and Warehouse Union Local No. 29 ("ILWU") offices. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained. and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which arc hereby acknowledged, the City and CPG agree as follows: .Agreement 1. CPG Portion of the Costs. The total CPG Portion of the Costs of the relocation of the ILWU is $70.000 pursuant to Section 1 of the Original Agreement. 1.1 Allocation of Tree Donation Proceeds. The City of National City and Constellation Property Group entered into an agreement effective May 6'h, 2008, (the "Tree Donation Agreement") whereby CPG donated mature trees to the City with a total donation value of S71. 17I.50. A portion of the total donation value equal to $25,171.50 was an expense directly related to the relocation of the trees (the "Tree Relocation Expense"). The CI'G Portion of the Costs of relocation of the ILWU shall he deemed to have been reduced by an amount equal to the "Tree Relocation Expense such that the remaining CP( i Portion of the Costs shall he $44,828.50 (thc "Remaining CPG Costs") 1.2 Rate. '1 he Remainine CPG Costs shall bear interest from the effective date hereof computed and calculated based upon a three hundred sixty (360)-day year and actual days elapsed and shall accrue at the per annum rate of 4.5 percent. 2. Time. The Rernaining CPG Costs and interest, thereon, shall be payable in consecutive monthly installments of five thousand dollars ($5,000) or more on the first day of each month beginning June 15, 2009. Such payments shall continue until the Remaining (:PG Costs and all accrued and unpaid interest is filly paid, with any unpaid Remaining CPG Costs and interest due and payable no later than June 15, 2010. 3. Miscellaneous. Execpt to the extent expressly modified by this Addendum. the Original Agreement remains in full force and effect. To the extent of any inconsistency between this Addendum and the original Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Addendum shall control. This Addendum may be executed in multiple counterparts, all of which, taken together, shall constitute one and the same document. IN WITNESS WIICREOF, the (:ity and CPG have executed this Addendum as of the Effective Date first set forth above. CPG: City: Constellation Property Group (Nat('ity 12th) ('ity of National City. a public body, LP, a Delaware limited partnership corporate and politic By: Constellation Property Management, By: Inc., a Delaware corporation Name: Its: General Partner Its: 2 Wayne atm Dev upment Director City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT /FETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13 ITEM TITLE RE.SC)I U I lON :\UTHORILING ACCEPTANCE OF GRAN I AWARD OF C 71,594.00 FROM I HE STATE of. CALIFORNIA. DEPAR f\ILN I OF :\LCOIIULIC BEVERAGE• CONTROL (ABC) FOR TRAINING AND ENFORCEMENT OF LA\VS PLR AINING 10 ALCOHOI. COMPLIANCE, INCLUDING DECOY OPERATIONS AND A1JT1((:)RILING IHF CHIEF OF 1'OI ICE TO SIGN ALL GRANT RI-1 AI ED DOCIJMI N IS CONCERNING THE ARC GRANT. PREPARED BY Corporal Antonio Ybarra 336-4530 x (1381) EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT POLICE The National City Police Department has been approved to receive $71.594.00 in grant funds from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The grant was approved for a one-year period beginning July 1, 2008. This award is based upon a grant proposal submitted to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Our grant goal objectives are to provide officers with updated ABC training, inform and train ABC licensees on responsible hospitality, and identify/target problematic establishments to bring them back into compliance. Each ABC licensed establishment will be inspected at least twice and we will host at least one LEAD training session by the end of the grant The grant funds are allocated to pay 100% of the officers' salaries, on an overtime basis, operating expenses and travel/registration fees for an out of town conference. Grant funds will also be used to purchase the following quipment: two (2) Plasma High Definition Televisions with all the required mounting accessories. e. Environmental Review 11 NIA Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director The grant awards $71,594.00 over the one-year grant period. There are no matching funds required for the grant. The City is not obligated match any of the funds. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Copy of Grant Agreement A 200(9/99) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 - RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT AWARD OF $71,594 FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL (ABC) FOR TRAINING AND ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS PERTAINING TO ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE, INCLUDING DECOY OPERATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CHIEF OF POLICE TO EXECUTE ALL GRANT RELATED DOCUMENTS CONCERNING THE ABC GRANT WHEREAS, the National City Police Department has been approved to receive $71,594 in grant funds from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), which was approved for a one-year period beginning July 1, 2008; and WHEREAS, the grant goal objectives are to provide officers with updated ABC training, inform and train ABC licensees on responsible hospitality, identify/target problematic establishments to bring them into compliance, inspect licensed establishments at least twice, and host at least one LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the acceptance of a $71,594 Grant Award from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the Chief of Police to execute all grant related documents on behalf of the City of National City. ATTEST: PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Michael R. Della. City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney Ron Morrison, Mayor STAILPrCc3LItUtNId--CUSINE5_7IL°N.ShORt4TIO,V6NPh. JIAs;AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL i�J7 I enna,e ,t•,tr ICQ c;AUI<AMENTO CP. 95334 '6) 419•25C5 ;y16) 419 2599 I AX June I �. 2(l0R Chief Adolfo Gonzales National ('ity Police Department 1200 National Cit', Boulevard National City. CA 91950 Subject: Grant Contract aORG-LABS 1)ear Chief Adolfo Gonzales: AKr+D'_(liiCtIWARZENLGGEB_.,,von t CHIEF'I3O �'E JUN 23 2008 III FZEC ,'F.3; Enclosed please find four copies of the Standard Agreement contract to he entered into between the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and the National City Police Department in the amount of $71,594. Please sign and return all four copies, with an original signature on each. to my attention. In Addition, we will need a copy of your Governing Body's Resolution in acceptance of this funding and your Federal Taxpayer's Identification Number. Alter we Icceive the ahuve information from your agency, the contract will then he submitted to the Department of General Services I.egal Unit for final approval. Upon their approval, we will execute a fully signed contract for your records. lfyou have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (91O 419-25'S . Sincerely, Patsy I omasel o, Manager Administrative Services/Grant Unit Enclosures CC Office' Antonin Yharra (wlo enclosure) Jt 1N-?.1-2008 14: 37 DEPT OF ABC HQ 916 419 2599 P.01 (41,10KNrl State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control Grant Assistance Program PROPOSAL COVER SHEET (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT AGENCY) 1. Name of Applicant Agency: City of National City Police Department 2. Description of Applicant Agency: Provide a brief summary including department size, staffing, and structure. National City is the second oldest city in San Diego County. The city was incorporated on September 17,1887. The National City Police Department (NCPD) is a full service police agency employing 135 falitime employees, 92 of them are sworn officers and 43 professional staff. Our department serves a diverse community of about 63,773 in an area of 9.2 square miles. The department is comprised of many different operating units and divisions to include: Patrol, lnvestigatims, Operations/Support, Traffic, and Administration. The department is led by a Chief of Police with the assistance of a command staff consisting of an Assistant Chief of Police and six Lieutenants. 3. City or County Served: City of National City 4. Population of Service Area: 63,000 5. Project Description: Summarize the proposed project covering the objectives, method of procedure, evaluation, and end product. National City has 110 ABC licensed establishments. The NCPD has been unable to properly manage most of the ABC licensed establishments, concentrate coordinated enforcement, or create community awareness. Our objectives are to provide officers with updated ABC training, inform and train ABC licensees on responsible hospitality, and identify/target problematic establishments to bring them back into compliance. Each ABC licensed establishment will be inspected at least twice and we will host at least one LEAD training session by the end of the grant. 6. Funds Requested; $71;594 7`Project Period: July 1, 2008 — June 30, 2009 8. Acceptance of Conditions: By submitting this proposal, the applicant signifies acceptance of the responstt-baity to comply with all requiremeuts stated in the Request for Proposals. The applicant understands that ABC is not obligated to fund the project until the applicant submits correctly completed documents required for the contract. A. Project Director (person having day-to-day R. Chief of Police or Sheriff responsibility for the project) (authorizing official) Name: Antonio Ybarra Address: 1200 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 9195 Pbone: (619) 336-4411 Fax: (619) 336-4282 E. Mail Address_ a ci tiytta -eAty ca.us Signature: ( `T/�lr� Title: Senior Officer C. Fiscal or Accounting Official Name. Jeanette Cadndo Address: 1243 National City Boulevaid, National City, CA 9195 Phone: (619) 336-4251 Fax: (619) 336-4349 E. Mail Address: ladrido(r7k1.national-citv.ca.us Signatur Title- Finance Director Name: Adolfo Gonzales Address: 1200 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950 Phone: (619) 336-4511 Fax• (619) 336-4525 E. Mail Address: leonzates(a ci.national-city.ca.us Title: Chief of Police D. ABC USE ONLY RECEIVED MAR 2 6 ?n,-.R Dept of Alcoholic Beverage Control Arimin. Srvcs. Post -It" Drantl fax trensmiltal memo 7671 s oI Da9e9 ► To IF Co. Co. ,4 (r )C Dear. P'6171, -`%‘q --D. SAS AL,stet-a3G-\-14€ ` 3 JUN-24-2008 1 /1:.ti7 DEFT 7F nEc -D 9:6 419 ?599 P.02 PROJECT NARRATIVE 1. Summary — (15 points) a. Agency Description (including size, staffing, and structure) The City of National City is a coastal urban city located immediately south of San Diego and ten miles north of the United States/Mexico border. The city is the second oldest city in San Diego County, incorporating in 1887. National City is home to over 63,000 residents, 15,400 housing units, and 3,500 businesses over 9.2 square miles including commercial/industrial manufacturing, large retail shopping centers, small family owned businesses and several convalescent care centers housing the elderly and infirm. • National City has the youngest population of any jurisdiction in the county. The median age of National City residents is 28.1, two and a half years younger than the next youngest jurisdiction and more than seven years younge, than the median age for the county. • National City has the third highest proportion of population under age eighteen and the sixth lowest proportion age 65 and over (28% and 10%, respectively). • National City is the most ethnically diverse jurisdiction in the county. It is the only jurisdiction with a majority Hispanic population (60%), Asian (19%), White (13%), Black (5%), and Other (3%). • The average occupancy per household is 3.47 in National City - the highest in the county. • Almost half (46%) of National City households are occupied by renters, the fourth highest of any jurisdiction in San Diego County. • The median income for National City households is S33,515, which is the lowest in San Diego County. More than one in five (21%) people are below the poverty level. The National City Police Department (NCPD) is a full service police agency employing 135 fulltime employees, 92 of them are sworn officers and 43 professional stall. Our department serves a diverse community of about 63,773 in an area of 9.2 square miles. The department is comprised of many different operating units and divisions to include: Patrol, Investigations, Operations/Support, Traffic, and Administration. The department is led by a Chief of Police with the assistance of a command staff consisting of an Assistant Chief of Police and six Lieutenants. There are currently 110 ARC licenses within the city limits. b. Funding Requested The National City Police Department is seeking assistance in the amount of $71,594 c. Goals and Objectives (Should be measurable) Goal 1: To provide line patrol officers grant reimbursable training by ABC sworn staff by August 2008. • Develop/implement a standard operating ABC enforcement and training program. • Line up and conduct training by ABC sworn staff for police officers. Provide monthly roll call training on alcohol -related issues for all sworn personnel. Goal 2• To provide information and training to ADC licensees with information on responsible hospitality by June 2009. • Schedule and coordinate at least one LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) Class. Allibil A • Coordinate and conduct IMPACT (Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol -Related Crime Tendencies) Operations at 100% of the licensed premises within National City. Goal 3: To implement both traditional enforcement measures along with ABC enforcement tactics to create awareness and promote compliance by June 2009. • Identify and target problematic ABC licensed establishments. • Recruit youth volunteers to participate in enforcement operations. • Conduct one enforcement operations per month targeting ABC licensed premises utilizing various tactics, such as "Shoulder Tap", "Minor Decoy", `Trapdoor", and "Obvious intox". Goal 4: To increase communication and create awareness of the grant in our city by June 2009. • Develop a policy and procedure to inform citizens in our community about this project and give periodic updates on the status/accomplishments of the project. • Increase communication and involvement with local community groups and citizen action committees by meeting with them at least four times a year. • Create a partnership with the Institute for Public Strategies (IPS) to provide leadership and strategies to support changes in public and private policy & community standards and norms. • Issue press releases regarding the grant and/or the activities conducted under the grant. Goal 5: To maintain and monitor all updated files of the ABC licensed establishments in our city by June 2009. • Update the Department's files on all ABC licensed establishments. • Prepare a written evaluation of the existing system of transmitting arrest reports involving licensees to the ABC (as required by Section 24202 Business & Professions Code). • Implement a new/improved system of transmitting arrest reports by June 30, 2009, if necessary. Goal 6: To reduce the calls for service at locations identified as problematic ABC licensees by 10% from the previous year by June 2009. • Analyze data collected on all enforcement operations and outcomes of each event. • Complete and return the final report to ABC demonstrating our results with data analysis conducted by our Crime Analysis Unit (CAU) on or before July 31, 2009. 2. Problem Statement - Describe the issues or problems to be addressed with grant funds. (25 points) For many' years, National City was known as the "mile of bars" instead of the "mile of cars". Over the last several years, City officials have been trying to clean up the city's irnage by considering ordinances that would require mandatory training for alcohol servers in the interest of community safety. In 2006, groups of local and countywide advocates believed that if National City adopted a "responsible beverage sales and service" ordinance, the rest of the county's cities would follow suit. Groups such' as Partners for Prevention, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, and the County's Alcohol and Drug Services wanted anyone serving or selling alcohol and their managers to have special training every two years. The training was to include how to spot fake IDs, how to serve alcohol responsibly and legally, and how to prevent illicit drug activity. It would have applied to licensed bars and restaurants, also known as on -sale establishments, and convenience stores, supermarkets or liquor stores, known as off -sale locales. JUN•?4-?I!Mn 'T C= AFC i u 916 419 ?5 Y3 P.03 Although the City Council eventually adopted an ordinance in September 2007 that did not require off -sale outlet employees to undergo training, the magnitude of problematic alcohol establislunents became pronounced. The City Council adopted an ordinance based on the City of Poway's 2003 ordinance, w;tich applied only to bars and restaurants where patrons consume their alcoholic beverages immediately. Advocates such as the San Diego County Policy Panel on Youth Access to Alcohol don't like the fact that youth have such high access to alcohol. Selling alcohol to minors is rampant in National City. There are currently 110 licenses within National City's 9-square-mile city limits. Between 1999 and 2004, 54 establishments were caught selling alcohol to minors, according to department statistics. The majority of the violations came from off -sale outlets. One example is Wrigley's Supermarket in National City that was cited three times in five years for selling alcohol to minors. Although National City has implemented a less -strict ordinance, there are not enough police officers to make the policy effective. Still, the City Council wants to make an effort to change the city's image. This want proposal will help train police officers, inform and train ABC licensees on responsible hospitality, and identify/target problematic establishments to bring them hack into compliance. In addition, the NCPD will work in partnership with the Institute for Public Strategies (IPS) to make the community aware of certain problems and to help rectify the identified problems encountered in the field (i.e. underage alcohol consumption, unlawful on - sale and off -sale establishment business practices, DU1s, etc). This grant will help change the image of National City. 3• Project Description - What are the goals and objectives of the proposed project? (25 points) Project Acceptance: (June 1, 2008-June 30, 2008) If selected for funding, a resolution will be submitted to the City Council authorizing the City to enter into a contract with the State. Project Preparation: (July 1, 2008-July 31, 2008) The project director will meet with all the support personnel required for this project. We will process the purchasing of all necessary equipment and supplies. We will recruit youth volunteers to participate in enforcement operations. Project Execution: (August 1, 2008-June 30, 2009) We will proceed with executing our goals/objectives as described in detail on pages 4-5: to provide patrol officers with updated ABC training, inform and train ARC licensees on responsible hospitality, and identify/target problematic establishments to bring them back into compliance. This component of the project will take place primarily on major holidays and during school functions at the local high school. Fach ABC licensed establishment will be inspected at least twice by the end of the grant period. Along with the inspections, we will host at least one LEAD training session for the ABC licensees. We will conduct one enforcement operation per month targeting ABC licensed premises utilizing various tactics; such as "Shoulder Tap", "Minor Decoy", "Trapdoor", and "Obvious Jntox". The media's involvement will be utst:urnental in creating community awareness for the duration of this project. The project director will attend the July 2008 and January 2009 ABC conference. The successful S Jt:11-24-200B 14:.38 DENT OF ABC HO 916 419 2599 P.04 completion of this project will be the sole responsibility of the project director. He will develop and execute plans to accomplish the goals/objectives, with assistance of support staff and patrol personnel. Proiect Data Gathering and Analysis: (August 1, 2008—June 30, 2009) We will document and maintain accurate records of all enforcement operations as well as the outcomes of' each event. All data will be reviewed, analyzed, and disseminated to the local media to build public awareness. Pmiect Final Report: (July 1, 2009 — July 31, 2009) At the completion of the project, all of our goals will be met. We will be able to demonstrate our results with data analysis conducted by our Crime Analysis Unit (CAU). Once we review all of the information that we accumulate during the grant period, we will complete and return the final report to ABC on or before July 31, 2009. Project Method of Evaluation: (July 1, 2009 July 31, 2009) The project director will evaluate the success of the project by answering the following questions: • Did we accomplish our goals/objectives? • Are line officers better rounded due to this project? • Did we achieve the desired outcome? • Could this project have been more cost effective? • What effect did the project have toward reducing/solving alcohol -related problems? 4. Project Personnel - Describe the staffing required to carry out the grant objectives as supported by the proposed budget. (25 points) The National City Police Department has had a positive ongoing working relationship with the investigators and attorneys of the local office of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. ABC investigators have assisted the department with several problematic establishments in National City. They also previously trained our department personnel on ABC enforcement and special programs available. The project will be administered by the Patrol Division. The project director, Police Corporal Antonio Ybarra, has worked closely with the current local ABC staff. During this partnership, they initiated many criminal investigations and administrative hearings on ABC licensed establishments. This was all done in an effort to improve the quality of life for all of the residents in our city. He will team up with two (2) Police Corporals and (4) Police Officers to carry out grant objectives and activities on an overtime basis. Additionally, the project director has worked with ABC investigators during concerts at the Coors Amphitheater, the super cross at Qualconun Stadium at the international border with Mexico during operation "Safe Crossing," and during major sporting events such as the Super Bowl. 5. Budget Estimate attachment. (5 points) 6. Other Funding Sources attachment. (5 points) 6 JUN-24-2000 14:38 CEP T Ur HBC. HQ J5' 'D.05 Exhibit B BUDGET ESTIMATE BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE -ITEM DETAIL COST A. Personnel Services (salaries, overtime, and benefits) (R°°°' budget •ntoun„ to nearest &Marl One (1) Police Corporal $6,502.51/mo. 25% $19,507.53 Employee Benefits - Benefits estimated at 30% x $19,507.53 Two (2) Police Corporals for 260 hours @ $54.63 per hour Four (4) Police Officers for 260 hours @ $52.04 per hour The calculations are made at a rate of 1.5 the regular salary Contract with the Institute for Public Strategies (IPS) not to exceed $10,000 $19,508 $5,852 $14,204 $13,530 $10,000 r TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $53,094 B. Operating Expenses (maximum $2,500) Minor Decoy, Shoulder Tap, and Narcotic Investigations operations $2,500 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $2,500 C. Equipment (maximum $2,500) Two (2) 42" Plasma HDTV with all the required mounting accessories for monthly in-house roll call training on alcohol -related issues for all sworn personnel $2,500 TOTAL EQUIPMENT $2,500 D. Travel ExpensefRegistration Fees (maximum $3,500) Registration for July 2008 GAP Conference 3 Attendees at $200 each Registration for January 2009 Conference 3 Attendees at $200 each Travel, per diem, and Lodging for the January and July GAP Conference $600 $600 $2,300 TOTAL TRAVEL EXPENSE $3,500 TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE, ALL CATEGORIES $71,594 JUN-24-200B 14:39 DEPT [ir ABC HO 916 419 25 39 P.06 OTHER FUNDING SOURCES Complete the following to report the total funds available to support the activities related to accomplishing the goals and objectives of the contract. In the "Grant Funds" column, report the ABC funds requested by category. In the "Other Funds" column, report all other funds available to support the project by category. Then calculate the totals by category in the "Program Total" column. Total each column down to arrive at the total program funds available. (Round all budget amounts to the nearest dollar.) BUDGET CATEGORY GRANT FUNDS OTHER FUNDS PROGRAM TOTAL Personnel Services $63,094 $0 $63,094 Operating Expenses $2,500 $0 $2,500 Travel/Registration Fees $3,500 $0 $3,500 Equipment $2,500 $0 $2,500 TOTALS $71,594 $0 $'/ 1,594 (This form does not become part of the contract.) 9 TOTAL P.06 JUN-24-2008 1'. 39 DE°T 0^ ABC HC 916 419. 2999 P.01/01 • Coordinate and conduct IMPACT (Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol -Related Crime Tendencies) Operations at 100% of the licensed premises within National City. Goal 3: To implement both traditional enforcement measures along with ABC enforcement tactics to create awareness and promote compliance by June 2009. • Identify and target problematic ABC licensed establishments. • Recruit youth volunteers to participate in enforcement operations. • Conduct one enforcement operations per month targeting ABC licensed prcmises utilizing various tactics, such as "Shoulder Tap", "Minor Decoy", "Trapdoor", and "Obvious Intox". Goal 4: To increase communication and create awareness of the grant in our city by June 2009. • Develop a policy and procedure to inform citizens in our community about this project and give periodic updates on the status/accomplishments of the project. • Increase communication and involvement with local community groups and citizen action committees by meeting with them at least four times a year. • Create a partnership with the Institute for Public Strategies (IPS) to provide leadership and strategies to support changes in public and private policy & community standards and norms. • Issue press releases regarding the grant and/or the activities conducted under the grant. Goal 5: To maintain and monitor all updated files of the ABC licensed establishments in our city by June 2009. • Update the Department's files on all ABC licensed establishments. • Prepare a written evaluation of the existing system of transmitting arrest reports involving licensees to the ABC (as required by Section 24202 Business & Professions Code). • Implement a new/improved system of transmitting arrest reports by June 30, 2009, if necessary. Goal 6: To reduce the calls for service at locations identified as problematic ABC licensees by 10% from the previous year by June 2009. Analyze data collected on all enforcement operations and outcomes of each event. • Complete and return the final report to ABC demonstrating our results with data analysis conducted by our Crime Analysis Unit (CAU) on or before July 31, 2009. 2. Problem Statement - Describe the issues or problems to be addressed with grant funds. (25 points) For many years, National City was known as the "mile of bars" instead of the "mile of cars". Over the last several years, City officials have been trying to clean up the city's image by considering ordinances that would require mandatory training for alcohol servers in the interest of couununity safety. In 2006, groups of local and countywide advocates believed that if National City adopted a "responsible beverage sales and service" ordinance, the rest of the county' i cities would follow suit. Groups such as Partners for Prevention, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, and the County's Alcohol and Drng Services wanted anyone serving or selling alcohol and their managers to have special training every two years. The training was to include how to spot fake IDs, how to serve alcohol responsibly and legally, and how to prevent illicit drug activity. It would have applied to licensed bars and restaurants, also known as on -sale establishments, and convenience stores, supermarkets or liquor stores, known as off -sale locales. TOTAL P.01 Al E OF CALI) UkNI,\ 1'ANDARD AGREEMENT U 213 (Rcv (6/O3) AGREEMENT NUMBER 08G-LA18 R rOls1 RA!ION NUMBER _ This Agreement is entered into between the State Agency and the Contractor named below: STATE AGENCY'S NAME Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control CONTRACTOR'S NAME City of National City through the National city Police Department The term of this • Agrcement is: July 1, 2008, through June 30, 2009 • The maximum amount $ 71,594.00 of this Agreement is: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following exhibits which are by this reference mad a part of the Agreement: Exhibit A - Scope of Work/Project Narrative Exhibit B - Budget Estimate Exhibit C - General Terms and Conditions Exhibit D - Payment Provisions Exhibit E - Special Terms and Conditions 4 pages 1 page GTC 307* 2 pages 1 page Items shown with an Asterisk (•) are hereby incorporated by reference and made part of this agreement as if attached hereto. These documents can be viewed at www.documentr.des.c4.gourols/GTC-307doc N WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto. CONTRACTOR ONTRACFOR'S NAME (If other than an Individwal. state whether a corporation. partnership, etr) City of National City through the National City Police Department 1Y (Authuclied Signature) IDATE SIGNED (Do not type) v o►>f `' 2 y- d �` PRINTED NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON SIGNING Adolfo Gonzales, Chief ADDRESS 1200 National laity Boulevard National City, CA 91950 STATE OF CALIFORNIA AGENCY NAME. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control BY (Authonzed Signature) +DATE SIGNED (Do not type) PRINTED NAME AND TITI.E OF PERSON SIGNING Ed Jimenez, Assistant Director, Administration ADDRESS 3927 I.ennane Drive, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95834 California Department of General Servkes Use Only Exempt per Y.\IIII?u rt PROJECT NARRATIVE 1. Summary — (15 points) a. Agency Description (Including size, staffing, and structure) The City of National City is a coastal urban city located immediately south of San Diego and ten miles north of the United States/Mexico border. The city is the second oldest city in San Diego County, incorporating in 1887. National City is home 10 over 63,000 residents, 15,400 housing units, and 3,500 businesses over 9.2 square miles including commercial/industrial manufacturing, large retail shopping centers, small family owned businesses and several convalescent care centers housing the elderly and infirm. • National City has the youngest population of any jurisdiction in the county. The mcdian age of National City residents is 28.1, two and a half years younger than the next youngest jurisdiction and more than seven years younger than the median age for the county. National City has the third highest proportion of population under age eighteen and the sixth lowest proportion age 65 and over (28% and 10%, respectively). • National City is the most ethnically diverse jurisdiction in the county. ft is the only 'jurisdiction with a majority Hispanic population (60%), Asian (19%), White (13%), Black (5%), and Other (3%). • The average occupancy per household is 3.47 in National City - the highest in the county. Almost half (46%) of National City households are occupied by renters, the fourth highest of any jurisdiction in San Diego County. • The median income for National City households is S33,515, which is the lowest in San Diego County. More than one in five (21%) people are below the poverty level. The National City Police Department (NCPD) is a full service police agency employing 135 fulltime employees, 92 of them are sworn officers and 43 professional staff. Our department serves a diverse community of about 63,773 in an area of 9.2 square miles. The department is comprised of many different operating units and divisions to include: Patrol, Investigations, Operations/Support, Traffic, and Administration. The department is led by a Chief of Police with the assistance of a command staff consisting of an Assistant Chief of Police and six Lieutenants. There are currently 110 ABC licenses within the city limits. b. Funding Requested The National City Police Department is seeking assistance in the amount of S71,594. c. Goals and Objectives (Should be measurable) Goal 1: To provide line patrol officers grant reimbursable training by ABC sworn staff by August 2008. • Develop/implement a standard operating ABC enforcement and training program. • Line up and conduct training by ABC sworn staff for police officers. • Provide monthly roll call training on alcohol -related issues for all sworn personnel. Goal 2: To provide information and training to ABC licensees with information on responsible hospitality by June 2009. • Schedule and coordinate at least one LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) Class. 1) • Coordinate and conduct IMPACT (Informed Merchants Preventing Alcohol -Related Crime Tendencies) Operations at 100% of the licensed premises within National City. Goal 3: To implement both traditional enforcement measures along with ABC enforcement tactics to create awareness and promote compliance by June 2009. • Identify and target problematic ABC licensed establishments. • Recruit youth volunteers to participate in enforcement operations. • Conduct one enforcement operations per month targeting ABC licensed premises utilizing various tactics, such as "Shoulder Tap", "Minor Decoy", "Trapdoor", and "Obvious Intox". Goal 4: To increase communication and create awareness of the grant in our city by June 2009. • Develop a policy and procedure to inform citizens in our community about this project and give periodic updates on the status/accomplishments of the project. • Increase communication and involvement with local community groups and citizen action committees by meeting with them at least four times a year. • Create a partnership with the Institute for Public Strategies (IPS) to provide leadership and strategies to support changes in public and private policy & community standards and norms. • Issue pros releases regarding the grant and/or the activities conducted under the grant. Goal 5: To maintain and monitor all updated files of the ABC licensed establishments in our city by June 2009. • Update the Department's files on all ABC licensed establishments. • Prepare a written evaluation of the existing system of transmitting arrest reports involving licensees to the ABC (as required by Section 24202 Business & Professions Code). • Implement a new/improved system of transmitting arrest reports by June 30, 2009, if necessary. Goal 6: To reduce the calls for service at locations identified as problematic ABC licensees by 10% from the previous year by June 2009. • Analyze data collected on all enforcement operations and outcomes of each event. • Complete and return the final report to ABC demonstrating our results with data analysis conducted by our Crime Analysis Unit (CAU) on or before July 31, 2009. 2. Problem Statement - Describe the issues or problems to be addressed with grant funds. (25 points) For many years, National City was known as the "mile of bars" instead of the "mile of cars". Over the last several years, City officials have been trying to clean up the city's image by considering ordinances that would require mandatory training for alcohol servers in the interest of community safety. In 2006, groups of local and countywide advocates believed that if National City adopted a "responsible beverage sales and service" ordinance, the rest of the county's cities would follow suit. Groups such as Partners for Prevention, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, and the County's Alcohol and Drug Services wanted anyone serving or selling alcohol and their managers to have special training every two years. The training was to include how to spot fake IDs, how to serve alcohol responsibly and legally, and how to prevent illicit drug activity. It would have applied to licensed bars and restaurants, also known as on -sale establishments, and convenience stores, supermarkets or liquor stores, known as off -salt locales. Although the City Council eventually adopted an ordinance in September 2007 that did not require off -sale outlet employees to undergo training, the magnitude of problematic alcohol establishments became pronounced. Thc City Council adopted an ordinance based on the City of Poway's 2003 ordinance, which applied only to bars and restaurants where patrons consume their alcoholic beverages immediately. Advocates such as the San Diego County Policy Panel on Youth Access to Alcohol don't like the fact that youth have such high access to alcohol. Selling alcohol to minors is rampant in National City. There are currently 110 licenses within National City's 9-square-mile city limits. Between 1999 and 2004, 54 establishments were caught selling alcohol to minors, according to department statistics. The majority of the violations came from off -sale outlets. One example is Wrigley's Supermarket in National City that was cited three times in five years for selling alcohol to minors. Although National City has implemented a less -strict ordinance, there are not enough police officers to make the policy effective. Still, the City Council wants to make an effort to change the city's image. This grant proposal will help train police officers, inform and train ABC licensees on responsible hospitality, and identify/target problematic establishments to bring them hack into compliance. in addition, the NCPD will work in partnership with the Institute for Public Strategies (IPS) to make the community aware of certain problems and to help rectify the identified problems encountered in the field (i.e. underage alcohol consumption, unlawful on - sale and off -sale establishment business practices, DUIs, etc). This grant will help change the image of National City. 3. Project Description - What are the goals and objectives of the proposed project? (25 points) Project Acceptance: (June 1, 2008-June 30, 2008) If selected for funding, a resolution will be submitted to the City Council authorizing the City to enter into a contract with the State. Project Preparation: (July I, 2008-July 31, 2008) The project director will meet with all the support personnel required for this project. We will process the purchasing of all necessary equipment and supplies. We will recruit youth volunteers to participate in enforcement operations. Project Execution: (August 1, 2008-June 30, 2009) We will proceed with executing our goals/objectives as described in detail on pages 4-5: to provide patrol officers with updated ABC training, inform and train ABC licensees on responsible hospitality, and identify/target problematic establishments to bring them back into compliance. This component of the project will take place primarily on major holidays and during school functions at the local high school. Each ABC licensed establishment will be inspected at least twice by the end of the grant period. Along with the inspections, we will host at least one I.EAI) training session for the ARC licensees. We will conduct one enforcement operation per month targeting ABC licensed premises utilizing various tactics, such as "Shoulder Tap", "Minor Decoy", `Trapdoor", and "Obvious Intox". The media's involvement will be instrumental in creating community awareness for the duration of this project. Thc project director will attend the July 2008 and January 2009 ABC conference. The successful ij ltXIIIUII rt completion of this project will be the sole responsibility of the project director. He will develop and execute plans to accomplish the goals/objectives, with assistance of support staff and patrol personnel. Project Data Gathering and Analysis: (August I, 2008-June 30, 2009) We will document and maintain accurate records of all enforcement operations as well as the outcomes of each event. All data will be reviewed, analyzed, and disseminated to the local media to build public awareness. Project Final Report: (July 1, 2009 - July 31, 2009) At the completion of the project, all of our goals will be met. We will be able to demonstrate our results with data analysis conducted by our Crime Analysis Unit (CAU). Once we review all of the information that we accumulate during the grant period, we will complete and return the final report to ABC on or before July 31, 2009. Project Method of Evaluation: (July 1, 2009 - July 31, 2009) The project director will evaluate the success of the project by answering the following questions: • Did we accomplish our goals/objectives? • Are line officers Netter rounded due to this project? • Did we achieve the desired outcome? • Could this project have been more cost effective? • What effect did the project have toward reducing/solving alcohol -related problems? 4. Project Personnel - Describe the staffing required to carry out the grant objectives as supported by the proposed budget. (25 points) The National City Police Department has had a positive ongoing working relationship with the investigators and attorneys of the local office of the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. ABC investigators have assisted the department with several problematic establishments in National City. They also previously trained our department personnel on ABC enforcement and special programs available. The project will be administered by the Patrol Division. The project director, Police Corporal Antonio Ybarra, has worked closely with the current local ABC staff. During this partnership, they initiated many criminal investigations and administrative hearings on ABC licensed establishments. This was all done in an effort to improve the quality of life for all of the residents in our city. He will team up with two (2) Police Corporals and (4) Police Officers to carry out grant objectives and activities on an overtime basis. Additionally, the project director has worked with ABC investigators during concerts at the Coors Amphitheater, the super cross at Qualeomm Stadium at the international border with Mexico during operation "Safe Crossing," and during major sporting events such as the Super Bowl. 5. Budget Estimate attachment. (5 points) 6. Other Funding Sources attachment. (5 points) Exhibit B BUDGET ESTIMATE. BUDGET CATEGORY AND LINE -ITEM DETAIL COST A. Personnel Services (salaries, overtime, and benefits) (Round budget amounts to nearesLdailec) One (1) Police Corporal $6,502.5I/mo. 25% $19,507.53 • Employee i3cnefits - Benefits estimated at 30% x $19,507.53 Two (2) Police Corporals for 260 hours @ $54.63 per hour Four (4) Police Officers for 260 hours @ $52.04 per hour The calculations are made at a rate of 1.5 the regular salary Contract with the Institute for Public Strategies (IPS) not to exceed $10,000 $19.508 $5,852 $14,204 $13,530 $10,000 TOTAL PERSONNEL SERVICES $53,094 B. Operating Expenses (maximum $2,500) Minor Decoy, Shoulder Tap, and Narcotic Investigations operations $2,500 TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $2,500 C. Equipment (maximum $2,500) Two (2) 42" Plasma HDTV with all the required mounting accessories for monthly in-house roll call training on alcohol -related issues for all sworn personnel $2,500 TOTAL EQUIPMENT $2,500 D. Travel Expense/Registration Fees (maximum $3,500) Registration for July 2008 GAP Conference 3 Attendees at $200 each Registration for January 2009 Conference 3 Attendees at $200 each 'Travel, per diem, and Lodging for the January and July GAP Conference $600 $600 $2,300 TOTAL TRAVEL EXPENSE $3,500 TOTAL BUDGET ESTIMATE, ALL CATEGORIES $71,594 5 i r I Payment Provisions Exhibit I) I. INVOICING AND PAYMENT: Payments of approved reimbursable costs (per Budget Detail attached) shall be in arrears and made via the State Controller's Office. Invoices shall be submitted in duplicate on a monthly basis in a format specified by the State. Failure to submit invoices and reports in the required format shall relieve the State from obligation of payment. Payments will be in arrears, within 30 days of Department acceptance of Contractor performance, pursuant to this agreement or receipt of an undisputed invoice, whichever occurs lass. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit advance payments as authorized by Item 2100-101- 3036, Budget Act Statutes of 2008. 2. Revisions to the "Project Narrative" and the "Budget Estimate" may be requested by a change request letter submitted by the Contractor. If approved by the State, the revised Grant Assistance Program Narrative and/or Budget Estimate supersede and replace the previous documents bearing those names. A contract amendment will be required to implement any such changes with the exception that changes in a budget line item of expense not to exceed five percent (5%) of the line item may be authorized without requiring a contract amendment if the total amount of the contract remains unchanged. 3. Contractor agrees to refund to the State any amounts claimed for reimbursement and paid to Contractor which are later disallowed by the State after audit or inspection of records maintained by the Contractor. 4. Only the costs displayed in the "Budget Estimate" are authorized for reimbursement by the State to Contractor under this agreement. Any other costs incurred by Contractor in the performance of this agreement are the sole responsibility of Contractor. 5. Title shall be reserved to the State for any State -furnished or State -financed property authorized by the State which is not fully consumed in the performance of this agreement. Contractor is responsible for the care, maintenance, repair, and protection of any such property. Inventory records shall be maintained by Contractor and submitted to the State upon request. All such property shall be returned to the State upon the expiration of this contract unless the State otherwise directs. 6. if travel is a reimbursable item, the reimbursement for necessary traveling expenses and per diem shall be at rates set in accordance with Department of Personnel Administration rates set for comparable classes of State employees. No travel outside of the State of California shall be authorized. No travel shall be authorized outside of the legal jurisdiction of Contractor without prior authorization by the State. {to Exhibit D 7. Prior authorization by the State in writing is required before Contractor will be reimbursed for any purchase order or subcontract exceeding $2,500 for any articles, supplies, equipment, or services to he purchased by Contractor and claimed for reimbursement. Contractor must justify the necessity for the purchase and the reasonableness of the price or cost by submitting three competitive quotations or justifying the absence of bidding. 8. Prior approval by the State in writing is required for the location, costs, dates, agenda, instructors, instructional materials, and attendees at any reimbursable training seminar, workshop or conference, and over any reimbursable publicity or educational materials to be made available for distribution. Contractor is required to acknowledge the support of the State whenever publicizing the work under the contract in any media. 9. it is understood between the parties that this contract may have been written before ascertaining the availability of appropriation of funds, for the mutual benefit of both parties, in order to avoid program and fiscal delays that would occur if the contracts were executed after that determination was made. 10. BUDGET CONTINGENCY CLAUSE - It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of the currcnt year and/or any subsequent years covered under this Agreement does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall he of no further force and effect. In this event, the State shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to Contractor or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and Contractor shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Agreement. If funding for any fiscal ycar is reduced or deleted by the Budget Act for purposes of this program, the State shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to the Statc, or offer an agreement amendment to Contractor to reflect the reduced amount. I r7 1 Exhibit E Special Terms and Conditions Disputes: Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under this contract which is not disposed of by agreement shall be decided by the Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, or designee, who shall reduce his decision to writing and mail or otherwise furnish a copy thereof to the Contractor. The decision of the Department shall be final and conclusive unless, within 30 days from the date of receipt of such copy, the Contractor mails or otherwise furnishes to the State a written appeal addressed to the Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. The decision of the Director of Alcoholic Beverage Control or his duly authorized representative for the determination of such appeals shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, or so grossly erroneous as necessarily to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence. hi connection with any appeal proceeding under this clause, the contractor shall be afforded an opportunity to be heard and to offer evidence in support of its appeal. Pending final decision of a dispute hereunder, Contractor shall proceed diligently with the performance of the contract and in accordance with the decision of the State. 2. Termination Without Cause: Either party may terminate this agreement at any time for any reason upon ten (10) days written notice. No penalty shall accrue to either party because of contract termination. 3. Contract Validity: This contract is valid and enforceable only if approved by the Office of Legal Services, State Department of General Services, if required, and if adequate funds are appropriated in Item 2100-101-3036, Budget Act of 2008, for the purposes of this program. 4. Contractor Certifications: By signing this agreement, Contractor certifies compliance with the provisions of CCC 307, Standard Contractor Certification Clauses. This document may be viewed at: www.dgs.ca.gov/contracts. 5. If the State determines that the grant project is not achieving its goals and objectives on schedule, funding may be reduced by the State to reflect this lower level of project activity. r� City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 'MEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 14 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE 30-DAY REVIEW AND PUBLIC COMMENT OF THE NATIONAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT'S GRANT APPLICATION TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF RIFLES, COMMUNICATIONS NITORS, DIGITAL CAMERAS, AND DIGITAL RECORDERS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT UTILIZING $1>9 FROM THE 2008 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) PROGRAM PREPARED BY Lt. R.G. Triviz/W. Amade DEPARTMENT Police Department (Ext. 4480) q.83 EXPLANATION The federal U.S. Department of Justice has announced the National City Police Department would be awarded $16,459 or 100% in new funding from the 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG). The National City Police Department would like to utilize the funds toward the purchase of Rifles, Communications Monitors. Digital Cameras, and Digital Recorders. The City is required to make the grant application available for review by the City Council and assure that the application is made public and an opportunity to comment is provided to citizens for not fewer than 30 days. The City is not required to allocate any up front costs or matching funds to receive the funding. The 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program is a direct grant allocation that requires agencies to complete an on-line application and narrative justifying the use of funds. Environmental Review '1 N/A Financial Statement 144k-- Approved By: finance Director The 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant does not require a match; therefore, there is no impact to the General Fund. Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council begin the 30-day review and public comment period, and then authorize the purchase of Rifles, Communications Monitors, Digital Cameras, and Digital Recorders from the 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial JAG Program utilizing $16,459 in grant funding. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. A-200 (9/99) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING THE 30-DAY REVIEW AND PUBLIC COMMENT OF THE NATIONAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT'S GRANT APPLICATION TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF RIFLES, COMMUNICATIONS MONITORS, DIGITAL CAMERAS, AND DIGITAL RECORDERS FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT UTILIZING $16,459 FROM THE 2008 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) PROGRAM WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Justice is currently reviewing a grant application from the National City Police Department for the purchase of Rifles, Communications Monitors, Digital Cameras, and Digital Recorders for the Police Department; and WHEREAS, the Police Department is required to make the grant application available for review and public comment for not fewer than 30 days; and WHEREAS, the 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program is a direct grant allocation program that entitles the Police Department to $16,459 upon approval of the grant application from the U.S Department of Justice; and WHEREAS, the U.S. Department of Justice will award $16,459 or 100% in grant funding to the City of National City to be used to purchase the equipment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby authorizes the 30-day review and public comment of the National City Police Department's Grant application, and authorizes the grant purchase of Rifles with Sight Optics and accessories, Communication Monitors. Digital Cameras, and Digital Recorders from the 2008 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Ron Morrison, Mayor ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT :ETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 15 (-ITEM TITLE PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Warrant Register # 51 for the period of 06/11/08 through 06/17/08 in the Amount of $1,873,121.18 D. Gallegos -Finance DEPARTMENT Finance EXT. Jeanette Ladrido 619-336.4331 Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 06/11/08 through 06/17/08. The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants Above $50,000.00 Vendor Check# Arco Gaspro Plus Kassab Public Emp Retirement Payroll Baidock Holdings Inc. 221195 221196 221359 Various 221292 Amount 75,050.57 109,642.95 257,056.54 936,312.17 82,462.00 Explanation Fuel -City Fleet T&A Deposit -Refund Emp Ret System PPE 06/02/08 PPE 06/02/08 Deposit Refund ( Environmental Review ('Financial Statement Not applicable. N/A MIS Approval Approved By: i Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Ratification of warrants in the amount of $ 1,873,121.18 BOLD / COMMISSION R OMMEN 'D,^r 1. W Warrant Register #51 ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) A.200 (Rey 7/03) Resolution No. A. ee 1/5 PAYEE ARCO GASPRO PLUS KASSAB PARMA ROMAN'S TRUCK BODY & PAINT BAKER & TAYLOR BRODART CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOC CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CORPORATE EXPRESS DEMCOINC. EBSCO EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES. INC LATIN AMERICAN BOOKS SOURCE LIBROMEX COM MAJESTIC RESOURCES. INC MIDWEST TAPE NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY NOLO PRESS. INC NCO INDUSTRIES NDOM HOUSE, INC .sECORDED BOOKS, LLC SIRSIDYNIX THOMSON GALE U S POSTMASTER ABBEY ARMOUR AT & T MOBILITY BEITZELL BELL BHINDER BRODART CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COOPER CORDOVA CORPORATE EXPRESS CUMAGUN DUONG EASTMAN EDUCATORS PUBLISHING SVC INC EMPIZO ESCONDIDO PUBLIC LIBRARY FLORINE GARCIA 'LL LDSBOROUGH GOMEZ HAYES HYNES IRVINE LA MARK lN40RP07~*'r O WARRANT REGISTER # 51 6/17/2008 DESCRIPTION FUEL FOR CITY FLEET DEPOSIT #1114 • 3102 E 16TH ST PARMA TRAINING - RISK MGMT BAYSHORE TRANSIT REFERENCE BOOKS EXHIBIT CASE CALIFORNIA LIBRARY ASSOCIATION OUT OF STATE SALES lAX FOR INV MOP # 45/04 ADAPTOR BOOK PROCCESING MATERIALS PRINT SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL EXPLORER EFI.03SV HEADPHONES BOOKS IN SPANISH INVOICE # 0001309-IN DVD'S FOR THE FILIPINO COLLECTION DVDNIDEOS/PROCESSING SUPPLIES ADULT NONFICTION BOOKS REFERENCE BOOKS 1-4 CARD ONI Y BLUE BARCODING BOOKS ON TAPE AUDIO BOOKS DVDNIDEOS/PROCESSING SUPPLIES REFERENCE BOOKS POS1AGE FOR OVERDUE NOTICES TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA,YR51 TRAVEL (AMERICOPRS LSTA. YR5) WINGS CELL PHONE TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA. YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA.YRS) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA. YR5) WOW GRANT, PROCESSING MATERIALS OUT OF STATE SALES TAXES TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA. YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA,YRS) MAT & SUPPLIES (LIT SERVCS YR5) I RAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA. YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS CNCS. YR5) CPR-1 RAINING (AMERICORPS CNCS) SPELLING DICTIONARIES TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YRS) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YRS) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS l STA YR5) 1 RAVEL (AMERICOPRS LSTA YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA, YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS CNCS. YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS, LSTA YR5) TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA.YRS) CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 221195 6/16/08 75.050 57 221196 6/16/08 109.642 95 221 197 6/17/08 25 00 221198 6/17/08 8.570 35 221199 6117/08 1.576 86 221200 6/17/08 7.241.19 221201 6117/08 40 00 221202 6/17/08 772.77 221203 6/17/08 198 03 221204 6/17/08 45 73 221205 6/17/08 22,530 00 221206 6/17/08 219 46 221207 6/17/08 57 40 221208 6/17/08 147 44 221209 6/17/08 7.884.24 221210 6/17/08 5.422 21 221211 6/17/08 15 90 221212 6/17/08 24 80 221213 6/17/08 9.156.95 221214 6/17/08 366 27 221215 6/17/08 794 97 221216 6/ t 7/08 16,748 40 221217 6/17/08 2,407 07 221218 6/1//08 590 00 221219 6/17/08 12199 221220 6/17/08 49926 221221 6/17/08 42 25 221222 6/17/08 118 98 221223 6/17/08 62 31 221224 6/17/08 131 40 221225 6/17/08 317.07 221226 6/17/08 256 26 221227 6/17/08 415 62 221228 6/17108 5311 221229 6/17/08 646 92 221230 6117108 241 64 221231 6/17/08 340 00 221232 6/17/08 70 00 221233 6/ t 7/08 486 88 221234 6/17/08 108.30 221235 6/17/08 50100 221236 6/17/08 104 64 221237 6/17/08 243 41 221238 6/17/08 35 78 221239 6/17/08 53 03 221240 6/17/08 104 39 221241 6/1 //08 14086 221242 6/17/08 385 06 221243 6/17/08 29 09 221244 6/17/08 238 30 2/5 WARRANT REGISTER # Si 6/17/2008 PAYEE DESCRIPTION CHK NO DATE AMQUNT LEE TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA. YR5) 221245 6/17/08 2865 LITERACYWORKS STATE LIBRARY EXPERT SVCS 221246 6/17/08 a7.000 00 LUSARRETA TRAVEL (AMERICORPS CNCS. YR5) 221247 6/17/08 58 /8 MANGER TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA. YR5) 221248 6/1 /108 167 69 MARSHALL TRAVEI (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YR5) 221249 6/17/08 444 93 MCCULLOUGH TRAVEL (AMERICORPS, LSTA YR5) 221250 607/08 328 26 MIDWEST TAPE DVDNIDEOS/PROCESSING SUPPLIES 221251 6/17/08 474.02 NEW READFRS PRESS INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS 271252 6/17/08 466 71 O'HARA TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA,YR5) 221253 6/17/08 694.71 ORIENTAL TRADING. CO.. INC INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS 721254 6/17/08 216 20 PAULISSEN TRAVEL (AMERICORPS CNCS. YR5) 221255 6/17/08 150 22 PEREZ TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA. YR5) 721256 6/17/08 44 23 POUZEAUD TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA. YR5) 221257 6/1 //08 156 10 PROLITERACY AMERICA MEMBERSHIP (LIT SERVCS YR5) 221258 6/17/08 129 00 QUINTAL TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. CNCS YR5) 221259 6/17/08 44 89 RAMAZ TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YR5) 221260 6/17/08 179 81 RAMIREZ TRAVEL (AMERICORPS, LSTA. YR5) 22126t 6/17/08 41 52 RATH TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YR5) 221262 6/17/08 102 01 SANDBERG TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YR5) 221263 6/17/08 31 57 SCHWARZWAELDER TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YR5) 221264 6/17/08 212 7 SINAVSKY TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. CNCS YR5) 221265 6/17/08 127 26 SMART & FINAL MAT& SUPPLIES CHILI COOK -OFF 221266 6/17/08 485 03 SMILE MAKERS GIVE AWAY PRIZES FOR WOWMOBILE 721267 6/17108 251 11 SOSA TRAVEL (AMERICORPS LSTA.YR5) 221268 6/1 7/08 103 47 STALIONS TRAVEL (AMERICORPS CNCS. YR5) 721269 6/17/G8 17 17 STRATEGIC RESOURCE COMPANY/ AMERICORPS HEAI.TIiCARE 221770 6/1 /108 4 376 42 TIGH. TAMARIE TRAVEL (AMERICORPS CNCS. YR5) 2212/1 6/17/08 421 54 TWAMLEY TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YRS) 221272 6/17/08 33798 WANG TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YR5) 221273 6/17/08 234 09 WASHINGTON LEARNING SYSTEMS LK ENGLISH INSTRUCTIONAL DVD'S 221274 6/17/08 405 33 WASHINGTON TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. CNCS.YRS) 221275 6/17/08 231 47 WICK TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. CNCS YRS) 221276 6/17/08 60 60 WIDMAR TRAVEL (AMERICORPS, LSTA.YR5) 221277 6/17/08 325 24 WILDER TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. CNCS YR5) 221278 6/17/03 83 77 WOODSON TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA. YR5) 221279 6/17/08 25 96 WRIGHT TRAVEL (AMERICORPS. LSTA.YR5) 221280 6/17/08 189 79 XEROX CORPORATION BASE CHARGES AND OVERAGES 271281 6/17/08 434.74 YANG TRAVEL (AMERICORPS CNCS. YR5) 221282 6/17/08 308 68 ADDICTION MEDICINE CONSULTANTS MEDICAL SERVICES - H R 221283 6/17/08 750.00 AEARO CO SAFETY GLASSES - PW 221284 6/17/08 56 48 AHLEE BACKFLOW SERVICE ANNUAL BACKFLOW TESTING 221285 6/17/08 4.637 22 AtRGAS-WEST MOP #45714 ACETYLENE & OXYGEN 221286 6/17/08 271 89 ALL THE KINGS FLAGS FLAGS 221287 6/17/08 19401 AMEDEE REIMB•P S F MEETING . FIRE 221288 6/17/08 904' AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO , INC MOP 62683 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS - PW 221289 6/17/08 320 AT&T/MCI PHONE XXX-0757 04/01-05/06/08 221790 6/17/08 1.00885 AUSTIN DOORS CITY-WIDE DOOR REPAIRS CITY WIDE 221291 6/17/08 2.326 87 BALDOCK HOLDINGS INC DEPOSIT#1023 21ST CONDOS 221292 6/17/08 82.462 00 BALDOCK HOLDINGS INC DEPOSIT#827 7100 HIGHLAND AVE 221293 6/17/08 2 477 70 BANC OF AMERICA PUBLIC & CAT LOADER EQUIPT LEASE PMT#9 221794 6/17/08 3.07/ 02 .410111040.411.. 3/5 PAYEE BANK OF AMERICA BOOT WORLD CALIFORNIA ELECTRIC SUPPI Y CAMPBELL CHOICEPOINT CHRISTIANSEN CITRIX ONLINE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF NATIONAL CITY COMMCINEMA INC. COOPER'S PLUMBING & HEATING CORPORATE EXPRESS COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO D-MAX ENGINEERING INC DANIEL PEARCE/ RPM WELDING DAVIES DELTACARE (PMI) DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 'PARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION -IELINE 1 UMBER CO. EMCO INDUSTRIES. INC EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT EXPERIAN FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC FISHER SAFETY/SCIENTIFIC GARCIA GOMEZ GONZALEZ GORMSEN APPLIANCE CO GRAINGER HAINES & COMPANY HARRIS & ASSOCIATES HORIZON HEALTH EAP HORIZON HEALTH EAP HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC. INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING INTL MUNICIPAL LAWYERS ASSOC INTEGRATED BIOMETRIC IRON MOUNTAIN RECORDS JUNIEL KILLACKY. KEVIN KILLACKY. KEVIN KILLACKY, KEVIN SER SAVER INC -XIS-NEXIS LUCAS. MAINTEX INC MARTIN & CHAPMAN MASON'S SAW & LAWNMOWER SRVC MATLOCK WARRANT REC1STER # 51 6/17/2008 DESCRIPTION CREDIT CARD FEES PD MOP64096 SAFETY BOOT BECFRRILL MOP 45698 ELECTRIC MATERIAL - FIN REIMB MILEAGE - FIRE AUTO TRACK DATABASE TRAVEL EXP ACE CONFERENCE - FIRE GOTOASSIST CORP SVC CONTRACT ANIMAL SHEI TER COSTS PETTY CASH APRIL 2008 06/13 & 08/01. 2008 OUTDOOR MOVIE CITY-WIDE PLUMBING SVCS/REPAIRS MOP 45704 OFFICE SUPPLIES CC PARKING CITATION REVENUE FEBRUARY 2008 SERVICES MOP #45749 FABRICATE TOILET BASE REIMB CERTIFICATION LIC - FIRE DENTAL INS PMI JUNE 2008 GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES HIGHWAY LIGHTING MOP #45707 STAPLE GUN, GRINDER CLEANER. DISINFECTANT UNEMPLOYMENT INS REIMB CREDIT CHECKS MOP#45723 UTILITY KNIFE. CEMENT 7828114/769559 AJAX AIR HAMMER KIT REIMB GAS TANK FOR TRAINING -FIRE REFUND R/L NOT REQUIRE EDUC REIMB WWTR 101 COURSE - PW MAINTENANCE & REPAIR MOP #65179 COIL BALLAST KITS SAN DIEGO DIRECTORIES PARKING ANALYSIS 16TH ST- PLAZA EMPLOYEE ASST PROGRAM JUN'08 EMPLOYEE ASST PROGRAM MAY'08 MOP #45720 SPRINKLER ROTORS 3/29/2008 TO 4/25/2008 SERVICES IMLA MEMBERSHIP - ATTORNEY GOVERNMENTAL PURPOSES RECORDS/DOCUMENT STORAGE REIMB'D C CONFERENCE - FIRE REIMB OPERATIONS USE FIRE REIMB INCIDENT#53830 - FIRE REIMB STATION #34 - FIRE MOP #45725 PRINTER CARTRIDGES ONLINE CHARGES MAY 2008 REIMB SCHOOL EXPENSES FIRE LIQUID LAUNDRY DETERGENT 2008 ELECTION MATERIALS - C CLERK MOP #45729 BACKPACK BLOWER REIMB - ACE CONFERENCE CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 221295 6/17/08 33900 221296 6/17/08 125 00 221297 6/17/08 497 32 221298 6/17/08 1869 221299 6/17/08 100 00 221300 6/17/08 27177 221301 6/17/08 2.160 00 221302 6/17/08 8.418 51 221303 6/17/08 539 05 221304 6/17/08 1.845 45 221305 6/17/08 1.443 19 221306 6/17/08 50549 221307 6/17/08 4.042 50 221308 6/17/08 38.830 85 221309 6/17/08 44155 221310 6/17/08 5100 221311 6/17/08 3.383 46 221312 6/17/08 37100 221313 6/17/08 2.546 50 221314 6/17/08 853 46 221315 6/17/08 103 53 221316 6/17/08 1,424 00 22131/ 6/17/08 25 48 221318 6/17/08 174 61 221319 6/17/08 8.971 04 221320 6/17/08 60 34 221321 6/17/08 338 00 221322 6/17/08 87 /5 221323 6/17/08 6200 221324 6/17/08 379 52 721325 6/17/08 1,609 28 221326 6/17/08 160 00 221327 6/17/08 869 94 221328 6/17/08 866 36 221329 6/17/08 109.10 221330 6/17/08 4 999 50 221331 6/17/08 840 00 221337 6/17/08 22 00 221333 6/17/08 105 00 221334 6/17/08 36.00 221335 6/17/08 50 38 221336 6/17/08 49 52 221337 6/17/08 22 83 221338 6/17/08 269 21 221339 6/17/08 37840 221340 6/17/08 24800 221341 6/17/08 80 58 221342 6/17/08 104 88 221343 6/17/08 558 36 221344 6/17/08 230 45 4/5 PAYEE MEDINA METROCALL MILE OF CARS ASSOCIATION MORGAN SQUARE INC MOTOR COP SHOP. INC MUNOZ NAPA AUTO PARTS NEXUS INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS OUT BACK MANUFACTURING PACIFIC AUTO REPAIR PAPA PERRY FORD PORTR.LO CONCRETE. INC PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM REED'S RESTAURANT EQUIP SVC REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM RELIABLE TIRE CO RIMS ROBINSON SANCHEZ SECOR INTERNATIONAL INCORP SHARP REES-STEALY MED GROUP SMART & FINAL STACK TRAFFIC ENGINEERING. INC SWEETWATER AUTHORITY THE COOLING STORE THE JBC GROUPS. LLC THE REGIONAL TRAINING CENTER TIEMAN TIEMAN TOM MOYNAHAN TRAINING & INSTRUCTION FOR TRAINING & INSTRUCTION FOR TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMENT TURF MAKER U S HEALTHWORKS UNDERGROUND SERV ALERT UNION TRIBUNE PUBLISHING CO UNITED PARCEL SERVICE VALLEY INDUSTRIAL SPECIALTIES VERIZON WIRELESS VILLA FORD WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES WOOD & WOOD WOOD & WOOD WOOD & WOOD ZAPATA WARRANT REGISTER # 51 6/17/2008 DESCRIPTION REIMB'ACCRED LIC/ACES CARD . FIRE PD PAGERS FY07-08 APPROTIONMENT#11 FY07•08 APPORTIONMENT#11 BLK/WHT "H". MED CLASSIC- HELMET LEAVE LAWS SEMINAR - HR MOP #45735 OIL FILTERS. LOCK PHONE MAINTENANCE AND SERVICE MOTORCYCLE HELMET HEADSET SMOG CHECKS FOR CITY VEHICLES LICENSE#QC23314 ANNUAL MEMB • PW MOP 45703 AUTOMOTIVE PARTS - PW MISC CONCRETE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDII MOP #45742 UNIFORMS - PARKS SERVICE PERIOD 06-08-3 R&M KITCHEN EQUIP RADIO COMMUNICATION - MAY 2008 SCRAP PASSENGER TIRES TRAINING-2ND HALF DAY SEMINAR REIMB ANNUAL EMSC CONE - FIRE TRAVEL & SUBSISTENCE UEPOSIT#1112 110 NAT CITY BLVD MEDICAL SERVICES • FIRE MOP 45756 KITCHEN SUPPLY - CC APRIL-MAY 2008 SERVICES STREET DIVISION WATER BILLS FOR FISCA. AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR AB 939 ANNUAL REPORT CCMA RETREAT - CM TRAVEL EXPACE CONFERENCE - FIRE REIMB EMSC CONFERENCE - FIRE MOP #45734 TOWING CHARGES TUITION-SEARCH/SEIZURE CLASS TUITION-SEARCH/SEIZURE P HERNANDEZ WORKERS COMP REPLENISHMENT GRASS SEEDS. STOVER SPORTFIELD MEDICAL SERVICES UNDERGROUND SVC ALERT CHGS ADVERTISING FOR LEGAL NOTICES UPS SHIPMENT MOP #46453 TOILET SEAT. COMP CAP CELL PHONES 04/27-05/26/08 DRIVER SEATS. REPLACEMENTS CHEMICALS FOR MUNICIPAL POOL CLAIM FRISBIE V CITY OF NC CLAIM:FLORES V J C PENNEY CLAIM GONZALEZ V OFFICER ONE REIMB CONE TRAVEL EXP - CM CHK NO DATE AMOUNT 221345 6/17/08 147 00 221346 6/17/08 9610/ 221347 6/17/08 75 78 221348 6/17/08 404 80 221349 6/17/08 383 95 221350 6/17/08 17 68 221351 6/17/08 41.03 221352 6/17/08 1.405 13 221353 6/17/08 480 04 221354 6/17/08 30309 221355 6/17/08 4000 221356 6/17/08 63 79 221357 6/17/08 22.548.25 221358 6/17/08 424 66 221359 6/17/08 257,056 54 221360 6/17/08 160 00 221361 6/17/08 9.063.00 221362 6/ 1 7/08 • 230 00 221363 6/17/08 35 00 221364 6/17/08 85.0 221365 6/17/08 66 66 221366 6/17/08 2.000.00 221367 6/17/08 6000 221368 6/17/08 61 1 / 221369 6/1 //08 6.250 00 221370 6/17/08 3 564 46 221371 6/17/08 568.34 221372 6/17/08 960 00 221373 6/17/08 200 00 221374 6/17/08 169 56 221375 6/17/08 120 00 221376 6/17/08 146 00 221377 6/17/08 570 00 221378 6/17/08 95.00 221379 6/17/08 34.020 71 221380 6/17/08 456.75 221381 6/17/08 255 00 221382 6/17/08 115.50 221383 6/17/08 169 60 221384 6/17108 77 38 221385 6/17/08 473 79 221386 6/17/08 1.151 98 221387 6/17/08 10./37.17 221388 6/17/08 1,001 3c 221389 6/17/08 49.562 8. 221390 6/17/08 7.03415 221391 6/17/08 451 95 221392 6/17/08 183 41 936,809.01 5/5 WARRANT REGISTER # 51 6/17/2008 PAYROLL. Pay period Start Date End Date Check Date 12 5/20/2008 6/2/2008 6/11/2008 936,312.17 A/P Total 936,809.01 GRAND TOTAI, S I.R73.121.18 rNaoxronNT" Warrant Register # 51 6/17/2008 001 GENERAL FUND 104 LIBRARY FUND 105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND 108 LIBRARY CAPITAL OUTLAY 109 GAS TAXES FUND 111 POST FUND 115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND 125 SEWER SERVICE FUND 130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND 136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND 154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND 158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND 166 NUTRITION 171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT 172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND 173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT 174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC 191 STOP PROJECT 212 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND 230 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT GRANT 246 WINGS GRANT 254 LEAD -BASED PAINT HAZARD REDUCTION GRANT 277 NC PUBLIC LIBRARY DONATIONS FUND 282 REIMBURSABLE GRANTS CITYWIDE 290 POLICE DEPT GRANTS 301 GRANT-C D B G. 302 CDC PAYMENTS 307 PROPOSITION A" FUND 320 LIBRARY GRANTS 552 TDA 626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND 627 LIABILITY INS FUND 628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND 629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC 631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING 632 GENERAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES 633 UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE RESERVE 643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND 644 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RESERVE 724 COBRA/RETIREE INSURANCE 726 ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS T & A DEPOSITS Total 921,444 81 45,367 97 24,430 03 52.835 64 5,216 52 49 41 307 70 64.367 77 3,843 17 8177 3,677 97 795 48 13.585 30 4,497.47 3,691 51 2,761 96 5,343 33 2,090 67 5,180.30 2,963 47 27.728.42 1.969 63 654 93 9,869 14 4,565 24 27,246 30 85.380 32 6,888 82 70,558.40 8.570 35 30,581 55 94,771 32 5.671 92 15,517 26 7.232.62 17,403 33 1,424.00 87.219 27 10,737 17 16.29 196,582 65 1,873,121.18 LETING DATE July 15, 2008 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 16 AGENDA ITEM NO. (-ITEM TITLE PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Warrant Register # 52 for the period of 06/18/08 through 06/24/08 in the Amount of $458,651.19 D. Gallegos -Finance DEPARTMENT Finance EXT. Jeanette Ladrido 619-.336-4131 Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued for the period of 06/18/08 through 06/24/08. The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants Above $50,000.00 Vendor Check# Amount Explanation Bond Blacktop, Inc 221405 289,394.36 Slurry Seal Project EnykonmentallLevjew N/A inaloa appllcaDle MIS Approval Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATIOM Ratification of warrants in the amount of $ 458,651.19 BOARD / COMPASS]," COMMEN 1. Warrant Register #52 ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. A-2X Ikev 7/03) 1 of 4 WARRANT REGISTER 4 52 6/24/200S Payee I)escription chk no cbk date Amount HOFFMAN CLAIM FRISIHI'. V CITY OF NC 221393 6/23/08 3,375.00 AFFORDABLE SERVICE APPLIANCES BIN CONTROL 221394 6/24/08 353.75 AIRGAS-WI.SI HELIUM 221395 6.'24/08 22.21 AI.L THE KINGS FLAGS FLAGS 221396 6'24J08 380.19 AMEDFF. REIMR ('ITY MLLIIN(;S - FIRE 221397 6/24/08 116.16 ANTIIONY'S AUTO BODY LEFT REAR I',1NEL 221398 6/24/08 824 20 ART 1) NII{ISEN PAINTING, INC CIII'-WIDE. PAINTING 221399 6/24/08 1.260.00 AT&I/MCI PI(ONL XXX-0986 6/7. 7/6/(IX221400 6/21108 2,525.31 Al&TIMCl PIIONF XXX-6486 3/1-5/19n)r( 221401 6/24/08 40.03 'JSf!N DOORS CIIY-WIDE DOOR REP.AIRS('IIY WIDE221402 6'24/0R 892.50 BEST BEST & KRIF:GLR LI.P CLAIM RE RNLI ARDO 221403 624l08 9,900.00 BNI BIM DING NI:WS ADA CA MANUAL 27.1404 6/24'08 69 98 BOND RI A('K I O1', INC. JUNE 2008 SERVICI S 271405 6/24i08 289,394 36 RROADWAY AUTO ELECTRIC ELLCTRI('AI. PAR IS I OR VEHICLES 221406 6'24/08 172.40 CAI IIORNIA BAKING CO RRPAD PROI)I ICI S 221407 6/24/08 809 80 CI.II EMPLOYMI.N I 'I LAMINATION 221408 6/24/08 145.25 (ANGULAR WIRELESS pr) I)A 1 A CONNECTION 221409 6/24/08 1,922 40 CLEAN HARBORS IAA/.ARDOI,S WASTE PICK UP 221410 6/24/08 883 00 COOPER'S PLUMBING & HEATING CITY-WIUI. PLUMBING SVCS,REPAIRS 221411 6/24/08 2,286 00 CORPORATE EXPRESS OrrlCI'. SI II'I'LIL:S 221412 6/24/08 198.69 CSMFO SAN DIEGO CI IAI'I I.R ('SMI'O-C'MTA LUNCHEON - FNAN('I' 221413 6/24/08 120 00 DISCOUNT SPECIALTY ('III.MICALs ({RAI'FI III REMOVER 221414 6/24/08 181 32 DIXIFI INF I.I IMRL.R CO. MOP #45707 WIPERS. GLOVES 221415 6/24108 1,717.14 DSI. EX I RI MI. USI, INTERNFT LINE FOR RI(: CN I R 221416 6.'24/O8 53 88 NVIRONMF:N IAL HA7.ARDS SERVICES HF.ALINY IIOMES DEMOS IRA I ION221417 6/24/08 504.00 1 2 or 4 WARRANT REGISTER tt 52 6/24/2008 Payee Description chk no chk date Amount FARINSKI RI -Milt- (:A MOTORCYCLE SAFETY 221418 6'24/08 274 22 FLINT TRADING, IN(: I'AVf.M1 N I MARKINGS 221419 6/24/08 2.116 44 GORMSEN APPI.IAN('F. ( ( ) MAINIHNAN('I .'I(I.I'AIR OF APPI.IANCES 221420 6/24/08 161 iK GRAINGER MOP P65179 I.AV1PN 221421 6/24/08 664 33 HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS MEAT PRODI'('YS 221422 624/08 4.094 10 HARKIS & ASSOCIATES APR11 2008 ST.k V ICES 221423 6/24/08 3,998 31 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES TRAFFIC ('Ol IN I s 1160K/07-3'31/08 SERVICES 221424 6/24/08 1,665.78 HOME DEPOT ENERGY STAR I'L(JORESCEN I LIGHT 221425 6/24/08 523 18 11UNTER'S NURSCRY IN(' Mop ::15719 SIIKLJUS, PLANTS 221426 6/24/08 126.42 HYDRO-SCAPE PRODI ICI SINC MOP#45720 ROIORSPRINK.I.ERS 221427 6/24/08 355.0 INFRASTRUCTURE FNGINEERIN(' FNGINFTRI\(i PLANNING SERVICES 221428 6/24/08 23.642.50 JOHN DF.ERE I.ANUSCAI'FS MOT' P69277 LOAMEX JUL SOII. 221429 6/24/08 192.01 KREPPS TRAVI.I. I.XI' - FIRE 221430 6/24/08 731.10 1.1MFUUECO RIJMIJ-)'UUt IC IREASIIRY ENSf SEMINAR 221131 6'24/08 121.71 I.OPEZ 'I RANSLATION SVCS 6/17:08 221432 6/24/08 100.00 MALLORY I'IRC 2007 ('A FIRE CODE INSPECTOR'S 221433 6/24/08 201 80 MASON'S SAW &. I.AWNMOWLI( SRVC MOT' P45729 SAW, CHAIN LOOPS 221434 6/24/08 345 76 MAYF.R REPROGRAPIlICS DIET I AI BOND 221435 6/24/08 464 13 MCGUIRE DISTRJRUTIUN VIII.K I'RODUC IS 221436 6/24/08 1,005 25 MISSION UNIFORM SERVICE: I EN{N SIJI'I'I.IES 221437 6/24/08 163.23 MORE! AND & ASSO(:IA I IS TRAINING REGIS'RATION FINANCE 221438 6/24/08 150 00 MUNISERVICFS I.I.0 SAI.I.S/1)ISI RICI TAX AUDIT 221439 6/24/08 17.955.14 NIX LOGIC. INC MAII. FIL I ER AND WEB FILTER SVC 221440 6/24/08 441 00 NATIONAL CITY (:AR WASI I (:Alt WASHES FOR CITY FLF.E1221441 6/24'08 268 00 NATIONAL CI'I'Y'I'ROI'IIY MOI':66556 DESK SIGN, LETTERING 221442 6/24/08 61 • 3 of 4 WARRANT REGISTER # 52 6/24/2008 Payee Description chk no chk date Amount ORKIN PEST CONTROI. PFsI MAIN IENAN('F: FOR CITY IRI.UG 221443 6/24/08 273.75 PARKIIOUSF. TIRE RRLUGF.STONF TIKES 221444 6/24/08 154.28 PEA( E.OFFICF.RS RI.SF:ARCII I'OI(AC.I'F.ACL nil R LR R1:SFAR('II 221445 6/24'08 90.00 PRO -EDGE KNIFF. SI IAKYENING SERVICE 221446 6/24/08 88.00 I'RIIDENTI.M. OVERALL SUPI'I 1' MO)' #45742 UNIFORMS • S1RIl:1 221447 6/24/08 132.75 ROI H STAFFING COMPANIES. I.l' I k111, ROTH S I AFF ING COMP 221448 6/24/08 756.52 SUGRE FACILI HES DIVISION GAS & 1 I .F.0 FRIC 221449 6/24/08 6,585 28 SKS INC CHEVRON RYKON HYDAIII.IC OIL. 221450 6124/08 998.13 SMART R FINAL MOI' I5756 MISC - FIRE, 221451 624/08 70.99 DLANA 4 1.NTER RF:CYC1.1-I) I'ROMOTIONAI. I 1 EMS 221452 6/24/08 2,591.25 SOU]] I HAY WINDOW & GLASS CO CLOSI'T DOOR 221453 6/24108 176.78 SOIT1tIWESFSIGNAI.SI1(VICE. INC 1RAIlICSIGNAL,STR41.I LIGHTING 221154 624'08 11.440.86 SI AR 1ECH COMI'I I I F.RS MUI' 61744 USR K LYRUARU 221455 6.'24/08 388.71 SWEETWATER Al, UHORI I Y I ACILITIES DIVISION 221456 6/24'08 15,949.10 SYSCO I UUDiCONSI MARI.F.S 121457 624/08 11,884.21 TARGETSAFF:1 Y (42) ANNUAL USI.I( LICENSE 221458 6/24/08 5,005.00 THOMSON WEST I.EG,U. PUIU ICAIIONS 221459 6124/08 637.84 TRISTAR RISK MANAGEMFNI REFUND FOR K RAPOZA 221460 624/08 20,042.75 UNITED RF.N FALS CONCRETE. HA I CH PLANT MIX 221461 6/24/08 285 97 VAT I.F:Y INDIISTRIALSI'1.(:IALTIES t1OPk16-I53 1'1.UMMBING.MAT1:RIA). 221462 6/24/08 48.05 VARNEI.1. REFUND OF 7.UNING LETTER FEES 221463 6'24/08 75.01) VISTA PAINT 1 RAFFIC PAIN!. FLAT. YELL ow 221464 624/08 203 86 WAFERLINF. TECHNOI O(fIES CIIEMICAI.s FOR MUNICIPAL. POOL 221465 6/24/08 1,946.67 WAX IF. SANITARY SIIP)'I.Y SPIN RONNE7 CARPI. TCLEANER 221466 6124/08 233.04 VFS1 FIELD SHOPPING 1 UWN PLAZA RONI I A - GIFT CART )S 221467 6'24/08 500 00 Pavcc YBARRA WARRANT REGISTER n 52 6/24/2008 Description REIMB-S1-.N I R1 PASS CHARGES 4 of 4 chk no chk date Amount 221468 6/24/08 122.25 Total S 458,651.19 Grand Total 458.651.19 4 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AEETING DATE July IS, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 17 ITEM TITLE Continued Public Hearing General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from Single -Family Small lot (RS-2) to Limited Commercial (CL) and a Proposed Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact at 2701-2703, and 2729 East I8th St. (Applicant: Productive Real Estate, I.LC.) (Case File No. 2007-60 GP, LC, IS) P!1'L PREPARED BY Martin Reeder, 336-4310 DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION City Council considered this item at their May 6. 2008 meeting. at which time concerns were raised by community members. Considering this input, Council continued the item in order for the applicant to reconsider the apartment complex which the ions change would facilitate. Concerns over the proposed commercial zoning, lack oI' ownership opportunities, density and the number of units were cited. 1 he applicant ha.. since provided a revised concept proposal to address Council's concerns. The new design proposes 10 detached single -tastily homes with condominium ownership and a residential zone change request rather than the original I6-unit, commercially -zoned apartment project. The applicant has also indicated that they intend to submit a Tentative Subdivision Map in conjunction with the revised proposal, as encouraged by staff: The new plan is strictly conceptual and in order to piocced would need to return to Planning Commission for approval. The background report describes the development in more detail. The Conditional Use Permit for the development of the site that would have been accommodated by this Zone Change is on tonight's agenda as a Public Hearing (Case File No. 2007-60 CUP). Environmental Review Proposed Negative Declaration (2007-60 IS) Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Account No. Finance Director STAFF RECOMMENDATION Stan' recommends Council initiate proceedings for a General Plan and Zone Amendment to change the zone from Residential Single -hastily (RS-2) to Residential Two -Family. (R I) and direct the applicant to apply for a Tentative Subdivision Map (Option No. 1). .gCP BOARD 1 COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below } Resolution No. 1. May 6, 2008 Staff Report 2. Background Report 3. Planning Commission Reso. No. 7-2008 4. Location Map 6 Negative Declaration 5. Department/Agency Comments 7. Applicant's Revised Plans A-200 (9r99) BACKGROUND REPORT The project site, consisting of two existing parcels- is a 37,835 square -toot rectangular property that stretches Irum East 18th Street to Fast 17th Street. Three single-family homes currently occupy the project site, two on one lot and one on the adjacent parcel. The lots contain little vegetation, with some mature eucalyptus trees and grass. The applicant was originally proposing to reclassify the zoning designation from Single -Family Small I.ot (RS-2) to Limited Commercial (CL), in order to construct a multi -family residential development. however, in response to Council continents, the applicant has made changes to the project and is now proposing to reclassify the zoning designation to Residential Two -Family (R'I'). At present, the remaining lots west of the project site are zoned CL. Conversely, the lots to the cast are RS-2 and RS-3-PD. The RT zoning could potentially act as a transition between the commercial and multi -family uses to the west and the single-family area to the cast. Under the current RS-2 zone designation. the site could be subdivided and developed with a moderately intensive residential development (i.e. up to 7 single-family homes). Under the RT zone designation, the site could he developed with duplexes or single-family housing at a density of 17.4 units per acre, or a potential yield of 15 homes. New plans show I (1 units proposed, rather than 16 as originally proposed, for a density of 1 1.5 units per acre. This density would be below the maximum residential density allowed by the General flan for the RT zone. Additionally, at the encouragement of staff, the applicant has stated that they intend to submit a Tentative Subdivision Map to provide home ownership opportunities; the 10 units are proposed to be condominium ownership rather than individual lots. The homes themselves and the proposed individual private yards would comprise the exclusive area, while the driveway. guest parking, and landscape areas would comprise the common area. in order for the applicant to proceed given these significant changes, the project would need to go back to Planning Commission for re -review and approval. 'there are multiple options that could he considered to facilitate this that arc listed below: I. htitiatc procecxhngs for a General flan and Zone Amendment to change the zone from Residential Single -Family (RS-2) to Residential two -Family (RT) and direct the applicant to apply for a Tentative Subdivision Map for ten units; 2. Direct the applicant to apply for a Tentative Subdivision Map for a maximum of seven units as allowed under the current Residential Single -Family (RS-2) zoning; 3. Approve the project as originally submitted; 4. Deny the project Concept plans submitted for review would need to he refined prior returning to Planning Commission. the applicant has stated that they wish to make sure the new design is satisfactory to Council prior to submitting a full detailed plan set including a tentative map. 1 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE Mav 6. 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. (ITEM TITLE Public Ilea' ing - General flan Amendment and /one ('hangs from Single -Family Small /// I.or (RS-2) to I incited Commercial (('I.) and a Proposed Finding, of No Significant Environmental impact ;it 7701-2703, and 272') East I814 Street (Applicant. Productive Real Estate. ITC.) (Case File No. 2007-60 GI'. /_(', IS) Nyt_ PREPARED BY Martin Reeder, 336-4310 DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION 1 he proposed Amendment and /.one Change were initiated January 10. 200 ' for five parcels on the north side of Fast I f{''' Street. 1 he original proposal was for a development of a mixed -use project, on two lots east of the current proposal site. The reasoning fur the /one change was to connect the existing areas /oiled I.inrited Commercial ((•I.) on the south side of I firs' Street at Granger Avenue and at the intersection of Ile Street and Lanuitan Avenue - resulting in a more congruent future development pattern It is important to note that the current project and applicant is different than the original proposal during initiation. The original project submittal in June 2005 was deemed incomplete and no follow up submittal has since been received. The current applicant, whose property was within the initiated area. re -paid the application fees in order to pursue his own project. •flu current application does not include the original three lots proposed for development. It involves solely the two parcels owned by the current applicant. The proposed /one Change would allow for both neighborhexxl level commercial uses, as well as multi -family development with a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 7. 2008. considered the application and recommended approval of the proposal. The background report describes the development in more detail. The Conditional Ilse Permit for the development of the site that would be accommodated by this %one Change is on tonight's agenda as a Notice of Decision (Case File No. 2007-60 (.(II'). Environmental Review Proposed Negative Declaration (2007-60 IS) Financial Statement NIA Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff concurs with the decision of the Planning Commission BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recommends Approval °fthe Combined (.iencral flan//oninc Map Amendment. Vote: Ayes: Del.aPai. Pruitt, Reynolds. Flores Nays: Alvarado, Baca ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. I. Background Report 3. I °cation Map S. Negative Declaration 2. Planning Commission Rcs° No 7-2008, 4 Department/Agency Comments 6 Applicant's Plans Incl. Findings & Conditions of Approval A •200 (9/991 BACKGROUND REPORT The prolcct site, consisting of two existing parcels, is a 37,835 square -loot rectangular property that stretches front East 18'h Street to East 17'h Street. The property is relatively flat for the first 19() feet, falling just ten feet, before sloping down another 15 to 20 feet to 17t Street. East 17th Street is an unimproved street with a 20-foot right-of-way. Three single-family homes currently occupy the project site, two on Assessors Pared Number 558-200-18 and one on Assessors Parcel Number 558-200-17. '1'hc lots contain little vegetation, with some mature eucalyptus trees and grass. The applicant is proposing to reclassify the zoning designation from Single -Family Small I.ot (RS-2) to Limited Commercial (('l.), in order to construct a multi -family residential development. At present, the remaining lots west of the project site arc zoned CL. Conversely, the lots to the cast are RS-2 and RS-3-PD. 'there are also commercial uses located across East 18th Street at the intersection of Granger Avenue. Under the current RS-2 zone designation, the site could be subdivided and developed with a moderately intensive residential development (i.e. up to 7 single-family homes). Under the CI. zone designation, the site could he developed with !united commercial uses or multi -family housing at a density of 22.9 units per acre, or a potential yield of 19 units. The 16 units proposed would have a density of 18.4 units per acre. consistent with the maximum residential density allowed by the General Plan for the ('1. zone. Although the residential lot to the west (2641-2645 h. 18'h St.) is currently only developed with three units, the potential yield of the lot under its CL zoning is I (► units. Although the RS-2 zone only allows one single-family detached residence per lot, several lots in the area are developed with multiple homes. duplexes, apartment complexes and non -conforming uses such as churches (Bible Baptist Church at 2432 E. 18th St. and First Congregational Christian Church of American Samoa at 2819 E. 18`h St.). In compliance with the California hnvironrnental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study was prepared to analyze potential environmental impacts. Based on the review of the project and deterniination of no potential significant impacts, a Negative Declaration was prepared for the project (see Attaclunent 5). The 20-day public review period for this document ended on April 7, 2003.» 'fhe City received one comment letter during the review period from a neighboring property owner who supports the project. Overall, the project is consistent with General Plan policies, since it encourages opportunities for multi -family or commercial development. In addition, the change of zone from single-family to commercial or multi -family provides for a better transition between surrounding multi -family residential and commercial properties. 3 RFSOLI.ITION NO 7-2U0 { Rl•:SOI 1 fI ION Ol• TI IL 1'I ANNINU ('OMtYlISSION OF 111E CITY OF NA-IIUNAI. CITY, CALIFORNIA RI -COMMENDING APPROVAL OF A GENERAI, PLAN AMI. NI)MI N I ANI) LONE CHANGE FROM SiNG!, F FAMILY SMAI 1 1 ( )I (I(S 2) TO LIMITED ('OMMFRCIAL (CI.) AND A PROPOSFI) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT I-:NVIRONMFN I Al. IMPA('1 AT 270I-770t, ANI) 27 i9 L. 18111ST API'LICAN I: PRODUCTIVE REAL. FS I A I I :. I .I.(•. ('ASi? FILL'. NOS. 2007-60 (iP. /(' WIIL•REAS, the Planning Commission considered General Plan Amendment and /one Change applications to change the land use designations on the (oinhincd General flaw/.onuig Map hum Single -Family Small Lot (RS-2) to L united Commercial (CL) tin apptoannately 0.87 arils at i701 -_' /03, and 2729 East 18'1' Slicer, APNs 558 200-17 nud IX. at a duly advcrtscd public hcanng on April 7, 7)00X, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented. and. W1IFRFAS, the Planning Commissum at said public hearing held oti April 7. '008 considered the staff report contained in (.asc File No. 2007 (>0 GP. and niaintained and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing, and WIIF.RI•:AS, this action is taken pru:uraru to all applrcab e prcc dines required byState Jaw and City law; and, \VH1•:RFAS, the Planning Commission iccotpnu/es the need and desnabrlity to conduct ions%s id, and consider amendments lo. the (iener:il Ilan to accommodate the chaining needs of the community, NOW, 71IF.R1•:FORF, BE IT RESOLVI:I) by the Planning Commission of the City of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning, ('onunission at the public heating held on April 7, 2008, support the billowing Findings for the Conihined Genet al Plan Amendment and Zone Change RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL. Of GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NT ANI) ZONE. (MANGE FROM RS-2 'I'(.l (71. The amendment to the (icncral t'I,tn, %Ouch kill change the coning of dic subject properties: lroni Residential Single -Faintly (RS 2) to (minted ('oi i ercial (('I.) is in the public interest and is consistent ‘vith liencral Plan policies, since it encoilialys the creation of high quality rental opportunities, and since it v.ill .ilto1+ niu(tt Family dekelopuucnt ur an area that is; currently dc‘eloped with a number of .ncill scale iuulti- family impel ties and sonic commercial uses 4 That tic proposed Zone ("hangs is consistent with and necessary to implement the (lateral flan, since the Genoal flan cncour,r)ges the production ::id riiminen.mce of the ('ity's rental :stock and that this area despite its orient single tarink ions designation rs developed with suiall-scale multi -family uses and conuncrcial detelopnu•nt Also. the piopxised tone ('hangs will allow for development than can plotidc :i better transition between existing adjacent residential and conutcrcial properties. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION That the Negative Deelaiation (2007-60 IS) has been read and considered together with any comments received during the public review process, and, that based on the whole record including the Initial Study. there is no substantial evidence that tlrc protect wl! have a significant effect on the environment and that the Negative 1)ecl; cation reflects the ('nty's independent judgment and analysis BF 11' I-11R PHI-:k RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration (2007 60 IS) together with any continents received during the public review piocess, and finds on the basis of the whole record (including the Initial Study and any comments received) that there is no substantial evidence that the protect will have a significant effect on the environment, and that the pluosed Negative Declaration reflects the ('ity's independent judgment and analysis, and hereby recommends approval of the proposed Negative Dee lai atio.m. BE 11 FURTHER RESOLVED) that the applications tin the Geneiai Plan Amendment and 'Zone Change aic rec4.tnuntendcxl fin appiuval to amend the Combined ( icneial I'Ian'/.mmng Map lion Single -Family Small I of (RS- )) to I suited ( (('I.), as further described on attached Exhibit A. BE IT hiikTIIER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted forthwith to the applicant and to the City ('mincit C'L•:Ri II:I('ATION: 'this certifies that tlrc !tesolutiun was adopted by the Planning Commission at their meeting. of April 7. 2008, by the following vote AYES: UeLaPar., Pruitt, Reynolds, Flores NAYS• Alvarado, Baca ABSENT: ABSTAIN: : 5 N 16tr 5�, CP j 0 0. N 1615 04 16 1625 o 1635 162Qo 1645 16q� ,c.y..;,y 1710 .‘ c — 7 V..,. s CO N6,• • W; 1� 22 coo 172i w V rn 0 1... CL RS-2 • w N� � 1.Itr st cP - CL \ N N� N ` Q N N --I Q 0 N-'0 '0 0 \, - ' 1g10 NA o 1810 1824 AO 1831 g26 1836 RS-3-PD ZONE BOUNDARY IMP IMP ME, . PROJECT SITE 100 0 100 Feet N LOCATION MAP 2007-0GP.ZC, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from RS-2 to Cl. and a Conditional Use Permit for a 16-Unit Apartment Project at 2701, 2703 and 2729 E 18 the Street NATIONAL CI6TY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 3/13/08 INITIAL HEARING: 4/7/08 City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-43 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR November 21, 2007 FROM: CITY OF NATIONAI. CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: Case File No: 2007-60 GP, ZC, CUP; Amendment to General Plan/Zonunu Single -family -Residential (RS-2) to Limited Commercial (C6) and a Con.i ., . . Permit to construct a 16-unit apartment project at 2701-2703, 2729 East 18ib Su, c' "llus General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, and Conditional Use Permit have be:n suhn• Planning Commission consideration. The applicant requests to change the zoning design,'. approximately 0.9-acre site on the north side of E. 18"' Street, east of I,anoitan Avenue, to Commercial (CI.) designation. The applicant proposes two eight -unit apartment buildings, 6.- feet of conunon open space for tenant recreational use, and live guset parking spaces. Each o; units will be 1,907 square -feet, including a 400 square -foot, two -car garage. The units wil bedrooms and two -and -a -half bathrooms, as well as approximately 380 square -feet of private consisting of two second -story decks and a private yard at ground level. Please submit your comments or recommendations on the proposed project by December 4. very important that your comments alert us to any aspects of the proposal which conflict with , that your department or agency administers. If you have no comments regarding the project, please the k and sign below, and return thi•: the enclosed plans. If you have any questions, please contact me at 336-4313. Thank you. MARTIN REEDER Assistant Planner No comments RAJ C✓ORfb/1Ai (7'I Et A) cc: Ruilding & Safety Department Engineering Department Stormwater Division "Traffic Fire Department erztrF.2ra,A5 wE e.e A A.o. Police Department A"I'&"1' Cox Cable San Diego Gas & Electric Sweetwater Authority • c-rpaDeG'6!i /If', -t 5. l4i Po.-.eled Parer 7 City of National City Office of the City Engineer 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4380 Fax: (619) 336-4397 ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS FOR 16 APARTMENTS •,.1 181" STREET I' .ANI) F:AS1I' OF LANOITAN AVENUE Date: December 3. -)007 To: Martin Reeder, Planning Department From: Adam J. Landa, Assistant Civil Engineer Via: Nlar\arn F3abaki. ('itk Etiginccr Subject: 16 APARTMENTS AT 18Trt STREET AND EAST OF LANOITAN AVENUE The Pnolny I'Ioject Apphcahllrtchecklist for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination S'stem (NPDES) is required to be completed and submitted to the Engineering D'partnreut the checklist wiII he required when a protect site is submitted for review of the C'it) Deparunents. Hie checklist is available at the Engineering Department. If it is determined that the project is subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Stone \\'ater BMI' Requirements" and the City of National ( itv Storer \\;,ter Best Management Practices of the Jurisdictional irhan Runoff Management Program (Jt1RJ'lP) approved Standard Urban Storer \\atcr \litigation flan (SI!SNIP) documentation will he required prior to issuance of an applicable engineering permit. The Sl1SNIP shall he prepared by a Registered C'i 11 F:ngurccl The Best klanagement Practices (BMPs) for the maintenance of the proposed construction shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination S)stem tNPDES) regulations which may require a Stone Water Pollution Prevention Plan tSWPPP) for the project An approved SWI'I'P will be required prior to issuing of a construction permit. 3. All surface run -oft shall be Heated with an approved Standard Urban Runoff Mitigation Ilan (SI;SMP) Best Management Practice (BMP) for all Priority S1'Sf\.1I' projects No runott 'kiII be permitted to tlow ocer the sidewalk. Adjacent properties shall he protected from surtitce run-off resultin2, from this development 0 Itcc)cicd I'arcr 8 4. A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the ('ity's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or litters. Best Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling. monitoring. and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A private stone vvater treatment maintenance agreement shall be signed and recorded. A checklist for preparation of the grading plan/drainage plan is available at the Engineering I )cpartmcut. 5. A sewer permit will he required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall he shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall he 6 inch in size with a clean out. A sewer stamp " S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the lateral. (,. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Department's review, after Planning Commission approval. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the required pavement structural sections tur the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall he 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch ('lass 11 aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National C'ity modified Standard Drawing (6-34. All soils report findings and recommendations shall be part of the Engineering Department requirements. 7. Street right-of-way shall he dedicated to the City (approximately 20' X 128' on 171" Street). 8. Pedestrian Ramp shall be installed on 18'h Street and shall comply with the A.D.A requirements and the San Diego Regional Standard Drawings 9. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the boundaries of the project shall be shown on the plans. If disturbed, a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer shall restore them after completion of the work. A Corner Record shall be tiled with the County of San Diego Recorder. A copy of the documents tiled shall be given to the City of National ('ity Engineering Department as soon as filed. 9 I0 .A permit shall he obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work \vithin the publtc rit!ht-of-way, and any grading construction on private property 11. Street itnpro\ements shall he in accordance with City Standards. All missing street impto\cutents shall be constructed (on 17th Street). Abandoned driveway aprons shall he replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalks. 12. :\ title report ,:hall he submitted to the Engineering Department, alter the PIaiuun: Commission :q>proval. for review of all existing easements and the ownership at the property. 13. A cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements. landscaptni, and [craining wall work shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved cost estimate shall be posted. I hree percent (°..%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are submitted fhe deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours and consultant sere ice, AI.:jha Ib 10 Page I of 1 Martin Reeder From: Stephen Manganiello Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 11:51 AM To: Martin Reeder Cc: Angela Reeder Subject: RE: 2701-2703, 2729 E. 18th Street Martin, The only comment I have on the plan is to stripe "no parking tire lane" to prohibit parking along the site driveway. Thanks. -Steve P.S. - In the future 'cc' City Engineer on all plan review requests. You can simply put "Traffic" in parenthesis after "City Engineer'. This way both Maryam and I will get the plans so she can stay informed. .Stephen Manganzcllo Traflc Engineer City of National City Engineering Department 1243 National City Hoalevvrd National City, CA 91950 4301 Phone: 619.336 4380 Direct: 619 336 4382 Ins: 619.336-4397 Lmail sarongxruelle ?ei.natinnal-rrty.ea.as Wcblink• Mµw.ci.natinnaca rrs 11 12/3/2007 City of National City Office of the City Engineer 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4380 Fax: (619) 336-4397 Date To Mattrn Re i t PI g Department From Barby Tipton, Storm Water Compliance Inspector Subject Case Fdu \o 200 /-6O (iP• ZC. CLIP 2701-2703. 2729 I•ast Ix'h Street November 26. 2O07 Applicant must pto\tde a Standard I lrhan Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SI»SI\IP) that providcs Site Design Source Control and Treatment Control Hest Nlanagement Practices in compliance \v-ith the (itv s SI;SNIP Ordinance Should tou ha\ e any questions, please contact me at i i6-458 Cc Friyineetinv the 12 ® Fcc.: ird PApet CITY OF NATIONAL CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT Phone: (619) 3.36-4550 MEMORANDUM DATE: I)ecemhcr '007 TO: Martin Reeder. Assistant Planner FRO1i: I)umald Condon. Battalion Chief : Dire Marshal SUR.11:("f: 2007-60 (iP. 7('.('lIP 2701-2701, 27.") F. 18`'' Street Please note our following crnnntents and recommendations: I) Project to he designed. developed and constructed in compliance with the Califiirnna Fire ( ode (('I'(_:) 1007 edition or CF(T in effect at time of permit issuance, the most current National Fire Protection Association (NIPA) .Standards and City of National ('tt� tiiunicipal Code and Ordinances as adopted by the City of National City 2) Fire apparatus access roadway to he maintained with a clear rninirnum width of 2(1 feet and an unobstructed -ertical clearance of 13 feet inches. Turnaround to he provided with a minimum cal -de -sac of SO feet. a hammerhead of 7� feet hw 24 feet. flies access roadway must he clearl( marked as "No Packing hie Lane' 3) Preliminary rev iew indicates a minimum tiro flow requirement of 4.1100 gpm measured at 20 psi residual pressure \yrth a Clow duration of4 hours. Please note that the above items are based off of a preliminary tcyirw of plans submitted. Additional requirements may he necessary upon submission of complete set of plans for permit review. 13 SWEETWATER AUTHORITY 505 GARRE T T AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA'J1912 2328 (019) 420-1413 FAX (G 19) 425-7469 )I)Ip //WWw.SWCeOtwa)Pr OK) November 28, 2007 Mr. Martin Reeder, Associate Planner City of National City Planning Department 243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 C.OVFRNIN . ROARD R MITCIICL OCAUCH4UAP C ALKIR[, VIC.F CHAIR JAME ) 'JIM' LOUD RON MOHHISON W fl 'RI,rV POOP (JNU ION TERR, THOMAS M AciC AIL T COO» WFI tiH DES#Iq A LIC.STAD GEN!HAL \1ANAl,L MARI, N ROY;E HS OrrnATIONC MANA(.EH Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY 2701, 2703, AND 2820 EAST 18TH STREET, NATIONAL CITY A.P.N. 558-200-17-00 AND 18-00 CASE NO. 2007-60 GP/ZC, CUP SWA DEV FILE: 2701, 2703, AND 2820 EAST 18TH STREET Dear Mr. Reeder: This letter is in response to the Application for a General Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit received by Sweetwater Authority (Authority) regarding the proposed 16-unit apartment project, within the Authority's service area. There is an 8-inch water main in the north side of 18'h Street. Authority records indicate that there are two existing domestic water services to this project. All water facilities for this project must be located in the public right-of-way. Enclosed is a copy of a portion of Y. SEC. 107 that shows the existing facilities. At this time, the Authority cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide domestic or fire protection for this project. As plans develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority, from the appropriate fire agency, stating fire flow requirements. Other items that need to be submitted are: Estimated water demand in gallons per day for domestic and irrigation use; a site plan; street improvement plan; irrigation plan; plumbing plan (showing total fixture -unit count); fire sprinkler plans, and calculations, so that service sizes can he verified, and estimates can be prepared. Based on this requirement, the Authority will determine if there is a need for new water systems, or substantial alteration to the existing water system. It is recommended that your agency work with the Authority to determine what facilities should be added prior to issuing a building permit. it Public Ilb4er Agency Serving National City, Chula Nista and Surrounding Areas Mr. Martin Reeder Re: 2701, 2703, and 2820 East 18th Street, National City November 28, 2007 Page 2 of 2 Any new water services installed to serve the proposed project will require the installation of backflow prevention assemblies. Additionally, water meters cannot be located within three (3) feet of the edge of the driveway apron. In the event that a fire protection system is required for this project, the Authority will require the installation of an approved Double Check Detector Check Backflow Assembly on that system. A ten (10) foot horizontal separation between sewer and water laterals is required. If the Owner provides the required fire flow information and enters into an agreement with the Authority for water facility improvements, if required, water service can be obtained at approximately 77 psi. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Laurie Edwards at (619) 409-6758. Sincerely, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY Hector Martinez Engineering Manager HM:LE:ss enclosure: photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 107 map cc: Don Condon, Battalion Chief/Fire Marshal National City Fire Department 140 East 12th Street, Suite A National City, CA 91950 Mr. Victor Castro Productive Real Estate, LLC 4354 34 1" Street San Diego, CA 92104 Mr. Miguel Alvarez, Sweetwater Authority (w/o enclosures) 11cnyr\Dev\2701. 7703. did 2820 r.hst 18th St1Cur\Ltr • Water AvaJ 11-28-07 tux 15 200 100 0 Sweetwater Authority Existing Water Facilities 200 Feet IMM NMI Subject Property: 2701, 2703, 2820 E. 18th St. APN 558-200-17 & 18-00 National City 1/4 SEC. 107 • Fire Hydrants —•- Water Mains Water Service, 16 ...................V..., ..,,.., . V.......... J.: ww .. <w. w.•..w+..... aver. .s.....••••• •.q M.lyaw.•••• .AU ♦..,.:)'r' rry as, w...wow .. a.....•• V w..e.-v. w-+• •...r. .. .. ..•-.J. • City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310 ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Project Title: General Platt/Zoning Map change from RS-2 to (.'I. and CUP for a 16-unit apartment complex at 2701-2703 and 2729 East 18th Street 2007-60 IS Applicant: Productive Real Estate Victor Castro (619) 335-0091 4354 341h Stieet, San Diego, CA 92104 Address of Project: 0.87-acre site on the north side of East I8°i Street, east of I.anoitan Ave. within the City of National City (APNs 558-200-17 and 558-200-18) Project r)escription The project site, consisting of two existing parcels, is a 37,835 square -foot rectangular property that stretches from Fast 18th Street to East 17th Street. The property is relatively flat for the first 190 feet, falling just ten feet, before sloping down another 15 to 20 feet to 17`h Street. In this area of the City, Fast 17`h Street is a paper street. which means that it is not graded or paved. The 20 feet right-of-way is present throughout, though appealing as a dirt path rather than a paved street. Three single-family homes currently occupy the project site, two on Assessors Parcel Number 558- 200-18 and one on Assessors Parcel Number 558-200-17. The lots contain little vegetation, with some mature eucalyptus trees and grass. •I he applicant is proposing to reclassify the zoning designation for the property from the Residential Single -Family (RS-2), to the Limited Commercial (CI). 1 he existing homes would be demolished and two eight -unit apartment buildings, 6,400 square -feet of common open space for tenant recreational use, and five guest parking spaces would be constructed on site. Each of the sixteen units will he 1,507 square -feet, and include a 400 square -fort, two -car garage. the units will have three bedrooms and two -and -a -half bathrooms, as well as approximately 380 square -feet of private open space consisting of two second -story decks and a private yard at ground level. The primary construction materials include a stucco finish, asphalt root -shingles, with wrought iron and cedar fencing. Access to the site will he from Fast 18'h Street via a 24-foot driveway. Environmental Findings: The Negative Declaration (2007-60 IS) has been considered together with any comments received during the public review- process, and based on the whole record (including the Initial Study ('hecklist and any comments received) there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Negative Declaration reflects the C'ity's independent judgnent and analysis. A copy of the Initial Study documenting reasons tp1support the finding is attached (2007-60 1S). ® kccvcki Papa 1. PROJECT TITLE/PROJECT #: 2. LEAD AGENCY: Contact: Phone: 3. PROJECT LOCATION: 4. PROJECT PROPONENT: Contact: Phone: 5. COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/ ZONING DESIGNA'IlON: General Plan/Zoning Map change from RS-2 to CL arfcl flit' for a 16-unit apartment complex at 2701-2703 and2729 Fast 18th Street 2007-60 IS City of National City Planning Department 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 Martin Reeder, Assistant Planner. (619) 336-4310 0.87-acre site on the north side of East 18th Street, east of Lanoitan Avenue, within the City of National City (APNs 558-200-17 and 558-200-18) Productive Keal Estate 4354 341h Street, San Diego, CA 92104 Victor Castro (619) 335-0091 Residential Single -Family zone (RS-2) G. ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS: 2008-60 GI'/ZC/CUP 7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The project site, consisting of two existing parcels, is a 37,fl$ Square- 1 of rectangular property that stretches from East 18"' Street to Fast 17th Street. The property is relatively flat to: the first 190 feet, falling just ten feet. before sloping down another 15 to 20 feet to I7"' Street. In this arca of the City, East 17th Street is a paper street, which means that it is not graded or paved "flee 20 feet right-of-way is present throughout, though appearing as a din path rather than a paved street Three single-tamily homes currently occupy the project site, two on Assessors Parcel Number 558-200-18 and one on Assessors Parcel Number 558-200-17. The hots contain little vegetation. with sonic mature eticalyptus trees and grass. The applicant is proposing to reclassify the zoning designation for the property from the Residential Single -Family (RS.2), to the Limited Commercial (CL). The existing homes would be demolished and two eight -unit apartment buildings, 6,400 square -feet of common open space for tenant recreational use. and five guest parking spaces would he constructed on site. Each of the sixteen units will be 1,507 sc#.arc-feet, and include a 400 square -trot. two -car garage. The units will have three bedrooms and two -and -a -half 18 Initial study - Page 2 of 15 bathrooms, as well as approximately 180 square -feet of private open space consisting of two second -story decks and a private yard at ground level. The primary constriction materials include a stucco finish, asphalt rwf shingles, with wrought iron and cedar fencing. Access to the site will be from Last I Zf° Street via a 24-kot dri veway. 8. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL MAY I3E REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): N/A ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or is "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Land Use & Planning ❑ Transportation/Circulation ❑ Public Services ❑ Population & I lousing ❑ Biological Resources ❑ t itilities & Service Systems ❑ Geological Problems ❑ Energy & Mineral Resources ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Water ❑ hazards ❑ Cultural Resources illAir Quality ❑ Noise ❑ Recreation ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance DETERMINATION: ('t o he completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this Initial Evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed protect MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at (east one effect (I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (Z) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, it the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or is "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effect that remains to be addressed. 19 Initial Study - Page 3 of 15 Signature I )ate Printed Name: MARTIN KEEDER Title: ASSISTANT PLANNER EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "IYci Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A "No Impact" answer .should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards. 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off -site as well as on - site, cumulative as well as project •level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as ilfieralional impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or Tess than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence than an effect may be significant. If there arc one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less than Significant w/ Mitigation Incorporated" applied where the incorporation of a mitigation measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to "Less then Significant Impact". The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a Tess than significant level. 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). G. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the st4$ement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Intormatton Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This in only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, leach agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whichever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identity: a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and h) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. 20 Initial Study Page 4 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources 1. AESTIIEfICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse cftcct on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but riot limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway'! c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime Views in the arca? Potentially Less Than IAss Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact impact w/ Miligahon Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ q ❑ ❑ qCEI ❑ ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ 0 El Discussion: ihere arc no designated scenic vistas nearby or across the proposed pmject site. As such, no vistas would be adversely impacted by the proposed project. Also, the Pity does not have a policy to protect private viewshsds. •Ihe proposed project site is currently used as a residential lot, with three older single-family homes, thus not containing any scenic resources. Tlic site is surrounded by other residential uses, some smaller scale wmmcrcial uses across 18'h Street and a church tour lots to the cast. The pmposed development includes III new apartment units with varied building rpatenals and architectural elements, as well as the standard associated improvements and landscaping. Development of the site would improve aesthetics of the area by providing landscaping and construction of 16 residences, where there is currently little landscaping and three older, deteriorated homes bordering a dirt road. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a significant adverse effect on scenic resources, since implementation of the project would remove deteriorated stnrctures and replace them with a cohesively -designed, well landscaped multi -family complex. The proposed development would consist of residential units that would include design features to direct lighting to the project site and avoid spillover to adjacent areas. (Sources: I, 2, 3, 4) 11. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES - In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources an: significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation & Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert ('rime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps preprart:d pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? h) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use/ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant wf Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorparatlon ❑ ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion: National City is a built -out community and then is no tarmland mapped or planned to be mapped within the 21 Initial Study - Page 5 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources Potentially Less Than Leas Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation impact Incorporation City, or more specifically on the project site. The site is also currently zoned for single-family residential, and no Williamson Act contract is associated with the land; therefore, the development would have no impact on agricultural zoned areas. (Sources: I , 4) Ill. AIR QUALITY Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following deterntinahons. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of thc applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? c) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Potosiiall. Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impart Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ 0 I hscussion: 'The County of San 1)iego is in attainment for all California Clean Air Act (CCAA) pollutants with the exception of ozone. The proposed project includes the development of single-family structures on property currently improved as a parking lot, and does riot include any design components that would obstruct the Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) for San Diego County. According to vehicular traffic generation data published by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) the project would result in an approximate increase of 96 daily vehicle trips. Emissions resulting froni developing thc site would be directly related to thc amount of vehicular traffic generated by the facility. Consequently, while the proposed project would have an incremental impact to area -wide air -quality, the individual impacts attributed to this project arc immeasurably small on a regional scale and will not cause ambient air -quality standards to be cxcecdee' or have a significant impact on air quality. As the project site has some slopes, the proposal is anticipatotl to require moderate grading on -site. However, any impacts from construction equipment and operations would be minimal and temporary in nature and the project applicant would be required to implement dust control measures. While dust from grading and other site preparation would generate particulate matter emission, due to the limited period in which grading will be conducted, and with appropriate use of Best Management Practices (BMP) for dust control, site clearance and grading, the project would not generate significant particulate matter or dust. Therefore, the proposed project would not have a significant impact. (Sources: 4, 7, 12) IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game (C'I)BG) or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Ilave a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, Potcnrialls Less Thais I.e..s Than No Significant Significant TO Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ 11 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El 22 Initial Study - Page 6 of 15 ISSI i);S with Supporting Documentation & Sources policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game (C'I )FG) or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) !lave a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, rnarsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direr t removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other interns? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife c orndors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation flan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact incorporation ❑ ❑ 0 El O 0 ❑ El 0 0 0 El O ❑ 0 El Discussion: The proposed project site contains little vegetation other than a few eucalyptus trees and grass. Also, no jurisdictional wetlands, other sensitive habitat, or sensitive species are located on the property; and data provided by the U S. Fish & Wildlife Service indicate the proposed project site contains no jurisdictional wetlands or jurisdictional waters of U.S. or state -defined streanibxds. The project site is located completely within an urbanized area, .surrounded by development and contains no sensitive habitats or biological resources that are protected by local policies or ordinances. There arc also no adopted habitat conservation plans known that include the proposed project site; therefore, there is no impact. (Sources: I, 2, 4, 5) V. CblinTRAL RESOURCES Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the signiticance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature*/ d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Potentially t.ss Than Less Than No Sigiuficant Significant of Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation O 0 ❑ El O 0 0 El O 0 0 10 O ❑ ❑ CA Discussion: No historical or archaeological resources as defined in Section 15064.5 are known to exist on the proposed protect site. Additionally, the developed nature of thc area as a residential neighborhood, along with the nearby commercial properties, suggests that no impacts to archaeological resources arc anticipated. The homes, although old (constructed in 1927 and 1935), are not of any noteworthy architectural style or significance, nor arc they on any historic list maintained by the State or the City Of National City. No cultural resource constraints are known to exist on thc currently developed project site. As such, there is a relatively low probability of disturbing any human remains and theretore, no significant impact. In the event of the accidental discovery ur recognition of any human remains during construction, the applicant shall take all appropriate steps as required by relevant federal, state, and Local taws. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a significant impact to cultural resources. (Sources: 1, 4) 23 Initial Study Page 7 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources VI. GEOLOGY & SOILS Would the project. a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: 0 Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 4Z. it) Strong seismic ground shaking'? in) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) landslides'? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Bc located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to Iifc or property? e) flaw: soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Potentially Lcss'1•han less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ O 0 ❑ El O 0 0 El O 0 ❑ El ❑ 0 ❑ El O 0 0 El ❑ ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ 0 Discussion: California Geological Survey information indicates thc site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Spacial Studies Lone, and there are no known active or potentially active faults that intercept the project site; therefore, the potential for ground rupture at this site is considered low. The nearest active fault to the site is the Rose Canyon Fault, located approximately three miles to the west. Accordingly, the site is not considered to pocvess a significantly greater seismic risk than that of the surrounding area in general. The site is not within an area susceptible to landslides and not within a fault zone, slide pronc area or an arca susceptible to liquefaction; therefore there is no impact or increased exposure to landslides due to the proposed project. It should be recognized that Southern California Is an area that is subject to some degree of s:isniic risk and that it is generally riot considered economically feasible nor technologically practical to build structures that are totally resistant to earthquake -related hazards. Construction in accordance with the minimum requirements of the Uniform Building Code should minimize damage due to seismic events. Iluc to the number and nature of thc active and non active fault lines within the southern California region, it can not be known when earthquakes will occur; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. The project site is currently underutilized, with three small homes and has little or no vegetation upon it. Proposed plans include substantial non -permeable development (two eight -unit apartment buildings and all additional open arras arc proposed to be landscaped. Additionally, all design and construction will require conformance with City's stormwatcr ordinance. Therefore, there is no Impact or increased substantial erosion due to the proposed project. The proposal project site would have traditional sewer laterals, which will connmt with the existing sewer system that serves the City. There would be no use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems; therefore, no impact. (.Sources: 2, 4, 13) 24 Initial Study Page 8 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Fkx•umentation & Sources Vll. IIAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIAIS Would the project a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? h) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment! c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed .school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sues compiled pursuant to Government Ctxic Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, when such a plan has not hcen adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? 1) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project urea? g) Impair impletnentahon of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loge, injury or death involving witdland tires, including where wildlands air adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wtldlands? Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El O ❑ 0 El ❑ ❑ n ❑ ❑ 0 0 Discussion: The proposed project site is within an arca that is not identified as a hazardous materials site.. There has been no pnor use of the property that involved hazardous materials, nor is the proposed multi •family residential use of the site associated with any anticipated hazardous materials. Also, the site is not within two miles of a public or private airport or associated airport plan. The project is not adjacent to any wiidlands or land subject to wildland firts; therefore there would not he any significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildfires. Therefore would not he an impact. (Sources: 1. 2, 4, 10, 13, 14) VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALiTY Would the project: u) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Suhstanhally deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the focal groundwater table level (eg., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existiIIK land uses or planned uses Poteatialh Less I has Less Than No Significant significant w1 Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation n ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 0 25 Initial Study - Page 9 of 15 ISSI TES with Supporting Documentation & Sources for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of thc site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff/ t) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality( g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood In.suranec Kate Map or other flood hazard delineation ?nap? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant nsk of Toss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of thc failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by scichc, tsunami, or ntudflow'/ Potentially Less Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ Li ❑ El ❑ ❑ L] ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ Li ❑ El ❑ D ❑ El n ❑ ❑ co O LJ 0 Discussion. The proposed project is suhjeca to state and local stormwater requirements including appropriate design features that adequately address water quality discharge requirements; therefore, there would he no significant impact. Also, the site is located in an urbanized developed aura and includes appropriate construction and permanent best management practices that would not significantly impact water quality. The proposed project site has no streams or rivers at or near the site. The requirements of the permit would control drainage on -site and not create an adverse effect to the natural drainage pattern of the site. The project will also be subject to state and local stormwater requirements, including appropriate drainage facilities to ensure adequate drainage on -site or into a city stormwater facility. I )evclopmcnt of the project will not substantially inerease the rate or amount of surface runoff and create flooding, nor will it create substantial erosion or siltation; therefore, there would be no significant impact. The area is not within a failure arca of a levee or dam; therefore, there would be no exposure of people or structures to any significant risks. The site is located also outside the boundaries of both the 100-year and 500-year flood Tones and is several milers inland from the San Diego Bay and other water features that would create the natural disasters mentioned above; therefore, there is no impact. (.Sources: I, 2, 4, 15) IX. LAND USE & PLANNING Would the project: Potentially Less 1 hau I.ess Than No Significant Significant e/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigatiou Impact Incorporation a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental cffcet? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ ® 0 26 Initial Study - Page 10 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources c:) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plant Potentially Less Than Less Than No significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ Discussion: The area surrounding the project site is a mix of residential and commercial uses, including a church, and a restaurant, as well as some vacant parcels; therefore no established community would be divided The area also Includes parcels with similar multi -family development and in the R.S-2 zone. The current zoning for the property is single-family residential (RS-2), which allows for one single-family home per lot, with a minirnum lot size of 5,000 square feet (8.7 units per acre). The proposed project would be for a 16-unit apartment complex on a 37,835 square -foot lot (18.4 units per acre). Therefore, the proposed project conflicts with the General Plan density and housing style requirements. In order to pursuc the pmjce , the applicant prciplisies to rezone thc property to the adjacent zoning to allow for higher density and multi -family opportunities; thc properties adjacent to the west for the remainder of the block arc zoned Limited Commerical (CL). If approved, the proposed zone reclassification would allow for up to 22.7 units per acre with an approved Conditional Use Permit. With the requisite gone change and development approval, there would he no conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation. Without the zone change, no additional construction would be permitted that did not conform to the standards of the existing zone. therefore there would be a less than significant impact. 'There is no habitat conservation or natural community conservation plans applicable in this area, therefore there is no impact (Sources: 1, 2, 4) X. MINERAL RESOURCES Wouki the project: a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? I'uteniialls Liss Iban Less fhan No Significant Significant wi Significant Impact Impact Mitigation impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ co ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion: There arc no known mineral resources on the proposed project site or delineated on a foal plan for the site; therefore, there is no impact. (Sources: 1, 2, 4) XI. NOISE Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise. levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundhornc vibration orgroundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic Increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the projeett Potential!) Less lbws Less Than No Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ 0 ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ 27 Initial Study - Page 11 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources r) For a project located within an an port land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? 0 For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Potentially less Than Tess Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ D ❑ ❑ D Discussion: While the proposed project area is in an urbanized area, it does not fall within an area of the National City General Plan Noise Contour Map subject to elevated levels of ambient noise. In addition, the project will comply with requirements of the State Building Code and City ordinances with regard to noise for multi -family residential projects. This requirement will be incorporated into project struchtral plans, and therefore there is no significant impact to new residents. The project, by its naturc as a multi -family project, would not typically generate noise levels or ground borne vibration in excess of local standards to affect neighboring properties. The associated grading and constriction on the project site would create temporary noise impacts. Modern construction equipment, properly used and maintained, should not exceed the noise limits contained in the City's Noise Ordinance. All noise generated by the project would be required to comply with the City's Noise Ordinance. Upon completion of the project, all noise front the project operations would he required to conform to the City's Noise Ordinance, and because construction noise is temporary, no significant impact from the project would occur. The proposal project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public use airport or private airstrip; therefore.., there is no impact to those people working on the project site. (Sources: 1, 2, 4) XII. POPULATION & HOUSING Would the printct a) Induce substantial population growth in an arca, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? h) Displace suhstantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Potentialli Less Than Less than No Significant Significant wl Significant Impact Inipact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Discussion: 'Me proposed project is a residential housing development including 16 new apartment units. As such, no significant increase to population within the City would bc expected as a result of the proposal. Also, while the development would result in some new population growth on the proposed property, the increase is not considered substantial as, if the project (including a Zone ('hangs) is approved, the City's General Plan would allow for a maximum density of 22.7 units per acrc on the site in this case. If no Zone Change is approved, there is no project. Therefore, there is no impact The proposed project would not displace substantial numbers of people or housing, as the project includes the addition of more housing units on a site that is currently improved with less than the amount proposed. As such, there no impact expected as a result of this project. (Sources: 1, 2, 4) XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES Pou ntiall) I.ess Than Less I ban No Significant Significant wl Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts 28 Initial Study - Page 12 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources aryl iated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protcchon7 Schools'? Parks? Other public facilities? Potentially la:sa Than Lcsa Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ litigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O 0 0 El ❑ ❑ ❑ El O 0 ❑ El Discussion: The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to public services. The project site is currently and will continue to be served by the National City Fire and Police Department. The closest lire Department is less than a half mile away on Euclid Avenue and 24'h Street, and the City Police Department less than 2 miles away at 12'1' Street and National City Boulevard. Typical response time for this neighborhood would not be adversely impacted, as plans do not involve changes to public streets adjacent to the site and since plans include retaining emergency access throughout the project area. Also, thc development will generate impact fees specifically slated for public services that will supplement any additional requirements brought about by the development; therefore, there is no significant impact. The proposed project would result in no impacts to City schools or parks, as the proposed 16-unit residential project would be expected to result in a negligible additional of school children or population in the area. Based on information from the San Diego County Office of Cducahon, National School Distnct has had declining enrollment numbers since 2001. Sweetwater Union High School District enrollment has been increasing in for the last several years. However, the rate of increase has dropped significantly in the last 3 years. The project also includes sufficient private open space on -site for use by residents to meet City requirements. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 11, 1 G) XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of thc facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does thc project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on thc environment/ ❑ ❑ 0 El ❑ 0 0 El Discussion: The proposed project includes the construction of a 16 apartment units, each with private, fenced rear yards, along with common open space areas for the entire development. As such, the proposed residential use of the project site would not substantially increase the use of local recreational facilities, necessitate construction of additional recreational facilities, or remove or impact existing facilities in the surrounding area; therefore, there is no impact. (Sources: 2, 4) XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC Would the project: a) (cause an increase in traffic which. is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of thc street .system (i.c., result in a substantial increase in either thc number of vehicle trips, the Potential') l.eu Than Less Tbao No Significant Sigrificani w! Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ 0 El 29 Initial Study - Pagc 13 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources volume to capacity rano on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that result in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? g) Conflict with adopted policies plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus burnouts, bicycle racks)/ Potentially L4:33 Than LesaThan No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ co ❑ ❑ ❑ rz ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ El LI ❑ ❑ El Discussion: The site has sufficient acxess to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated hy the propavcd usit:, since Fast 1 g"' Stre t, a Major Collector Street, has adequate capacity to handle the 96 average daily trips that would potentially he generated by the proposed use. Elased on comments from the City's Transportation Engineer, there are no expected impacts to City shrets. 'Ihe pmjcct provides for parking as required by the Lind Use Code and a "No Parking" stripe will be included as a Condition of Approval of the project to ensure no vehicles block driveway access to the proposed rsidenccs.'Iherefor, then: is nu impact. (Sourccs: 1, 2, 4, 10, 11, 12) Potentialh I.ess Than Less Than No XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Would the project: Incorporation a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable ❑ ❑ ❑ El Region) Water Quality Control Board'/ ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Require or result rn the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construct -ion of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage ❑ ❑ ❑ El facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from ❑ ❑ ❑ El existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider ❑ ❑ ❑ El which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitrtierits? f) He served hy a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to ❑ ❑ ❑ accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? 30 Initial Study Page 14 of 15 ISSUES with Supporting Do('unicntalion & Sources & Comply with federal, state. and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Potentially Lem Than Less Than No Significant Significant Significant Impact Impact w/ Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ El The proposed project would be designed and constructed using Best Management Practices (BMPs) to appropriately handle wastewater and not exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Ik>ard; therefore, there is no Impact 'the proposed project is located within an urbanized area and served by existing water facilities. Although there are adequate water supplies available for the existing homes on site based on existing resources, project conditions would include cooperation with Sweetwater Authority, the service provider, to ensure sufficient systems continue to bc made available on -site. Also, all necessary improvements will be included with the project approval and construction will be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDI S) regulations; therefore, there would not bc a significant adverse impact The proposed project site would be served by FDCO, the local waste collechon and recycle company. EDCO has a contract with the City to handle City solid waste disposal needs. According to EIX:O staff, the company utilizes several landfill sites for thc disposal of waste collected In National City, with the most common being Otay Mesa, Sycamore, and Miramar landfills. Each of these sites has ample capacity available; therefore, there is a less than significant impact. In addition, the proposed project would comply with all federal, state, and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. (Sources: I, 2, 11) XVII_ MANDATORY FINDINGS of SIGNIFICANCE. a) L)oes the project have the potential to degrade the: quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the numhcr or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory' b) Does the project have impacts that arc individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when Viewsed in connection with the effects of past projects, thc effects of other current projects. and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Potentially Lev Than Leas Than No Significant Significant wf Significant Impact Impact Mitigation Impact Incorporation ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ 0 El Discussion: No significant impacts to the environment as a result of this project have been identified. Approval of the project is not expected to have any significant impacts, either long-term or short term, nor will it cause substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly. 31 Initial Study - Page 15 of 15 REFERENCE SOURCES: Reference # Document Title 2 National City General Plan City of National City Municipal Cc do 3 City of National City Design Guidelines 4 16 Units on 1 ti'h St. Project Plans (2007-60 GP, ZC, CUP, IS) 5 US Fish and Wildlife Wetland Mapper System 6 II MA Map Service Center 7 2004 Triennial Revision of the Regional Air Quality Strategy for San Diego County, Ju1y 2004 8 Air Quality in San Diego County, Air Pollution Control District for San Diego County, 2006 9 Environmental Assessment Porn tor project 10 County of San I )iego I )epartment of Environmental Ilcalth wehsite 11 Comments from National City Fire, Building, Public Works & I:ngmcenng Departments and Sweetwater Authority 12 1995 National City Transportation Stirdy (SANDAG) 13 California Geologic Survey 14 Department of Toxic Suhstances Control 15 California Water t'lan Update 2005 16 San Diego County Office of Education Available for Review at: National City Planning I)cpt. 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 http:/ / wetlandsfws.er.usgs.gov/ wtltt ds/launch.htznl www.fema.yov National City Planning Dept. u www.srlcou rrty.ca.Kov/deh/ National City Planning Dept. u http://www.consrv.c.a.gpv http;//www.dtsc.ca.yov http://www.watcrplan.watcr.ca.gov htttr / / www.sdcoe.net 32 PROJECT DATA: .IS rw..a.....•••.•e. .C. 4.D Y•Ilk. .Y.. T UY W*ANON � .016M..a WO IMAM ...swim Fin aga vtcm4r MAP • \X PARCEL tIAP ..sw W* rc ribft sP PLAN it I r r • *WOW .M• NMI nrNO/ +w asa S-a. ' w..er...�.�. SALV120089V VNYWOYR r ( ) (-, c-, •;) (-, -) M 1j! I 35 EAST ELEVATION 4.1 ; 11.11. c: NORTH ELEVATION (VIEW FROM 17TH. STj • r woo. tb *v. 4 I I • U T 4.1 w M • r'Mrl _w.JRba Lr LS',sLl7 D. 00 WIN b(LJ ti .14. r - 1fw./r7 Re\II5ED 1)L-A 158 168 2'6" 14'8' :9 4 r Lung Room 59 Enrn Foyer Porch :34 French doc-s to :at* I�----9 4 Dinmq Room 11' K.tchei w Buy SmartDraw'- purchased copies prin this diarnent Witfoui a watermark. V•sit www.smannrew ram nr r•.all t -R00-7 -3729. 34' I1151" 1'UcCI1 a 10'4 ' 15 8'8 Deck 16 Off,ce/tech center t4-4,47.7 J•1 178 2 4' 14 4'8 LN Master Bedroo•n c BL o SmartD • 021 11 S1 LL nl' d'Copies print t ��. � .;.L-,:•.tip 16 1.4. Visit www.smartdrauistam or call 1-800.768-3 29. �.Y I98_• D1r rg S ;I." '.• • C-1 R tcner 15 14 4• Jv i9 Rxr, :9 r 11 R 2 Jx 's_ L J 237- it •5 P R. s:oraQe hitiC `911111] e �Ce ?4—°)1 ck).C3 Bey Smar1D•aw!• pt,•ciasaa v 51T W W W�lJ.��}1 I t 4'4' 1:-LO0Y77 :6 Master 8ed•ocm :58' • 1C 8 LN 7X9 Bedroom' ; Bedre:T 3 : 3'9' 5 154 39 JYT t o ,\ ' 1 7b,'\ 4 iszcnaseC Conies QI thls VIsa www.smartdr$w.COm or call 1-900.768.3 29 25' •i J • ice_ rt3}r� ;Ia.) !CO L) rod ts..a,1 «)..,u,1>< ia.ac. 3'.v J: auN ..r,o ay.JA ivQOVM o))n;s aa.r-tr. ,a.av3 ,6_ obus : o!,i wLo:r aa4 iood :Lust ,s5>r • 4:113s elysl IS DV, MU. ,)ql Cao)a: a)oas 6 w ;36 6'0s• uvrg space P•s1 Poor 1373st ng space second • oor Totai king space 1E39 ;a6e•e ree•. • 42Js1 ae•ege ROo1 !Me Aspne.,61r pie sn •r 0 30yr EAe'o'-eKtured s'l.: Alnekws Vinye Lcrv.E a6ei pare wm00'..s wicir.ds ✓'roJc 1•erna Foonoatcr Concrete • City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 18 (EM TITLE PUBLIC' HF.ARING ADOPTION OF THE CITY OF NA I IONAL CI TY'S 2008 USER FEE SCHEDULE PREPARED BY T� DEPARTMENT Brad Raulston w„ City Manager's Office EXPLANATION The City has completed a review of all user tees collected independently by Maximus with City departments and has formulated the recommended for user lcc schedule for consideration by the City Council. Government Code Section 66018 requires that a Public Hearing be conducted prior to the adoption of a resolution establishing new fees or increasing existing fees. Environmental Review X NIA Financial Statement Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION ('ity Council conducts Public (tearing and recommends proceeding with 2008 I lscr Fees Schedule provided as by City Departments. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Staff Report, Recommended Fee Schedule Maximus Fee Study A-200 (9/99) Staff Report USER FEES Rack round User fees are the fees charged by the various City departments for their services. The last City user fee review was conducted in 2004. User fees need to be modified frequently to keep pace with inflation and to avoid large fee increases. Recent increases in labor, materials and supplies may have resulted in user tees that are not sufficient to cover the cost of City services or new services may have been added in which the tees have not been established. In addition, some fees may need to he reduced or eliminated. In previous years, the departments were asked to review their fees, compare them with other jurisdictions then compute the cost of the service based on the amount of time spent on the service, personnel and materials costs. However, cities have been challenged in the courts on their development fees. With this in mind, the City Council on November 15, 20(15 contracted with MAXIMUS, Inc. to determine the user fees for the City. MAXIMUS. Inc. was chosen because of their many years of experience in calculating user fees that can be defended in the courts. The user fee study includes both the direct cost to the department and the indirect cost of the service thus allowing the Council to better understand the true cost of providing city services. This ensures that the City adopts fees that recover costs at the desired level without over or under charging for a service. flte Council can still choose to charge fees below cost recovery. Full Cost Recovery Development lees that do not provide for complete cost recovery require a subsidy from the General Fund (i.c. the taxpayers). National City has historically kept development lees low to promote growth in the City and to help homeowners with modest incomes make improvements to their property. Development projects in the city are now shifting • from homeowner additions and remodels, to infill residential developments and several commercial developments. In addition, the City is now attracting new development and it is expected that the development will continue without using fee subsidies as an incentive. It no longer makes sense to have the taxpayers subsidize City services that arc provided to the developers for their benefit. The Council, however, still has the ability to keep the fees for residential additions and remodels at a rate below full cost recovery. MAXIMIIS recommends that the City increase or decrease the current fees to the trill cost recovery level. Multi -Year Fees The proposed fees arc hased on the FY 07-08 final budget figures. Once the fee adjustments are made, MAXIMUS recommends that the City update the fee schedules periodically to account for changes over time by using an automatic fee increase mechanism. This method provides a level of convenience and efficiency because staff does not have to take the time to recalculate cost recovery percentages each year, yet the fees will increase to recover the budget increases due to staff increases in salary. Labor costs arc the majority of the expenses for the City departments. Increases in the department's budget are usually attributed to these costs. The City can insert into the rate schedule a fee increase factor that is based on known and anticipated labor cost increases, such as cost of living raises, association agreements, salary step increases, benefits increases and other salary or benefit enhancements. 'I'hc fee study has identified two other alternatives to updating the fees including recalculating the fees annually hased on new staffing and expenditures numbers. This method would be expensive and time consuming. The other alternative would be to base the lee increases on economic indicators. This method is not suggested since tying the user fee increases to cost factors that may or may not reflect reality in the departments can he inaccurate. Participation: Departments Several City departments were involved in the study that has varying involvement with the Public. •the user fees should reflect this activity and recover cost of applicable work. Development Services 'I his group included the following departments: Building, Planning, Engineering, and Fire Admin. The user fees are development, construction, and land use oriented. The services rendered are intake/records, plan checking and inspections. Typically, full cost recovery for projects should be obtained for private development and projects that require permitting. Notably the Building Dept.'s fees will have a new look to it; it is hoped that it will result in being user friendly and understandable. I'uhlic Services This group includcf the City Clerk, Police, and Finance Departments. In general, these departments conduct their business without fccs; however some tasks can be recovered through fees. tasks such as coverage for Police staffing for special events and Finance processing business licenses arc recoverable. It should he noted the Finance Dept is not evaluating or changing the taxi cab portion of their fee schedule and will remain consistent pursuant to City Council resolution 2004-229. Z Recreation Recreation programs arc nearly always subsidized by tax dollars. Parents may be unable or reluctant to enroll their children in programs if the fees were set at actual cost. Adults may pursue other recreational opportunities if city -sponsored programs were priced at actual cost. Apart for fees for non-residents, few, limy, communities set prices at cost. The fee schedule reflects this recommendation. Recreation fees can change every year as recreation programs change. For this reason, MAXIMUS developed an hourly schedule that will allow the recreation department to determine the cost of any program it offers and to update the programs as needed. Current Bucket Needs To assist balancing the OR-09 budget the potential increase in revenue from development (based on the increase in new development and full cost recovery fees) was used. If new full cost recovery development fees are not adopted, there will be a budget shortfall in the next fiscal year. Money that is not generated cover this shortfall will have to come from another source. New Fees To reflect the service wanted and activity from City Departments, several new fees were created. Building Department created a flat fee for residential electrical rewire and re - plumb for their units. This eliminates a tedious task for the public of fixture counting. Staff is also recommending standardizing the copy fee for the public to eliminate confusing of di tiering fees among the departments. Lowered Fees Several fees will now be lower after rioting community feedback through our last adoption cycle. These fees include new segmented permits recommended by the Fire Department for tent permit, hydrant permit, and canopy permit. Building Department's recommendation was to similarly adjust Temporary Use Permits and to historically keep key items low, such as water heater permits. Conclusion Staff conducted a comparison with other neighboring jurisdictions. The results showed that the City of National City is within an appropriate range among those cities in almost all cases. The 2008 User Fee Schedule is consistent with the adopted 2007 5-year strategic plan. Staff recommendation is to approve and adopt the new fee schedule. Attached are common comparables. the recommended 2008 tiser Fee Schedule, and the Maximus fee study. 3 $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Single Family Dwelling Total Building Fees 2400 sq feet with a 3 car garage flQ sb Carlsbad Vista San Marcos Escondido Oceanside San Diego, City \ _s El Cajon s� Poway Coronado National City proposed Santee La Mesa • • Solana Beach Encinitas Lemon Grove Imperial Beach Del Mar Chula Vista � �O;;y .b,.. Oto41 '!o \\ S2,500 $2,000 $1,500 $1,000 $500 $0 Single Family Addition Total Building Fees 500 Square Feet • +ti :3 G°5 G ,oaa ao a \ a� r �aG�. 'G'~a��(6. A) e, ,2, \� Jod�Cr O • �o• c>Qo(>& \"0\ ee• on��o G°0�teaGr OGO\o ° Q\\C �a $12, 000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 I $4,000 - I $2,000 $0 Restaurant Total Building Fees 5000 Square Feet 5�a \40as oe ae a� �a aCot. 0 Q \era \ a\o� Goy` « 0ac���ae e e\�.0 dear Q°eea eel'a° o aC��o e o G� acr �a p �a Quo \, , G6 ` °� \e� • \a�e coe dc. Seca p Qe§ cC• $20,000 $18,000 $16,000 $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 1 $4,000 $2,000 $0 Retail Total Building Fees 20,000 Square Feet/10 Tenant Suites RESOt.l1TION NO. 2004 279 RESOLU IION OF T1 IE CITY COUNCIL Of TIIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING A FEE SCHEDULE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF TAXICABS AND OTHER FOR -HIRE PARATRANSIT VEHICLES WHEREAS, Chapter 11.70 of the National City Municipal Code authorizes the City to license and regulate taxicabs and other paratransit vehicles operating within the City; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish a fee schedule in order to recover the City's administrative costs incurred in licensing and regulating those vehicles. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City hereby approves the Fee Schedule for the Administration of Taxicabs and Other Paratransit Vehicles. Said Fee Schedule is on file in the Office of the Director of Finance. PASSED and ADOPTED this 7'I' day of December, 20()4. ATTEST: Mi lee! R. Della/ City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, 11I City Attorney ('t-.RIIF-IF.D r()FHF:A I RI It: AND CORRF'.(-r COPY O1•'1 IlE`. ORICINA4 DO('IJMFNT I )jll.t. Cit) ()ed. (d% 'I Rii, n:d(lh 9 City of National City 2008 User Fee Schedule ID CITY CLERK Fee Number Fee Name Fee CC 1 Audio Tape City Tape $8.00 CC 2 rape provided by requestor $4.00 CC 3 Certified Copy $10.50 CC 4 Copies 8x11 standard per page $1.00 $0.1b CC 5 8x11 color per page $1.00 $0.25 CC 6 Oversized standard per page $1.00 $0.50 CC 7 Oversized color per page $1.00 $1.00 I' Fee Number EN 1 EN 2 EN 3 EN 4 EN 5 EN 6 EN 7 EN 8 EN 9 EN 10 EN 11 EN 12 EN 13 EN 14 EN 15 EN 16 EN 17 EN 18 EN 19 ENGINEERING Fee Name Record of Survey Encroachment Agreement Special Driveway Permit Easement Check Lot Line Adjustrnent Sidewalk, Driveway, Curb Permit Deferral Sewer Permit Flood Hazard Area Permit Construction Permit Annual Parking District Renewal Traffic Impact Study Review <3000 vehicles Traffic Impact Study Review >3000 vehicles Plan Copy Service Engineering Compliance Fee Investigation Fee Utility Company Permit Fee Traffic Control Plan Check Fee $796.00 $490.00 $368.00 $796.00 $1,259.00 $297.00 $670.00 $381.00 $201.00 $396.00 $35 00 $3,416.00 $6,833.00 $21.00 $553.00 $170.00 $512.00 $476.00 ' PRA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) iZ Fee Number FD 1 FD 2 FD3 FD 4 FD 5 FD 6 FD 7 FD 8 FD 9 FD 10 FD 11 FD 12 FD 13 FD 14 FD 15 FD 16 FD 17 FD 18 FD 19 FD 20 FD 21 FD 22 FD 23 FD 24 FD 25 FD 26 FD 27 FD 28 FD 29 FD 30 FD 31 FD 32 FD 33 FD 34 FD 35 FD 36 FD 37 FD 38 FD 39 FD 40 FD 41 FD 42 FD 43 FD 44 FD 45 FD 46 FD 47 FIRE Fee Name Fee FD Pln Chk Fire Sprinkler Improvement < 20000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 20001 - 45000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 45001 - 80000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 80001 - 100000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 100001+ Fire Sprinkler New < 20000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler New 20001 - 45000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler New 45001 - 80000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler New 80001 - 100000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler New 100001 + Fire Alarm New < 20000 sq ft Fire Alarm New 20001 - 45000 sq ft Fire Alarm New 45001 - 80000 sq ft Fire Alarm New 80001 - 100000 sq ft Fire Alarm New 100001+ Fire Protection Systems FD TUP Canopy 0-400 sq ft Canopy 401-500 sq ft Canopy 501-600 sq ft Canopy 601-700 sq ft Canopy 700+ Hydrant Tent 0-200 sq ft Tent 201+ sq ft Candles Open Flame Assembly Area Hot Work Carnivals and Fairs Install Tank Aboveground Tank Underground Removal Tank Aboveground Tank Underground Soil Vapor Extraction Install Underground Piping on underground tank Pyro Chem Fireworks Barge Loading Fireworks Display Misc Hazardous Occupancy Reinspection After 3 Malicious False Alarm False Alarm State Request Week Abatement Inspection Noncompliance Notice Hourly Rate Standard Standby After Hours per hour 2 hr min Additional hour per hour ' PRA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) I� $ 700.00 $900.00 $1,300.00 $1,800.00 $2,500.00 $995 00 $1,004.00 $1,807.00 $2,510.00 $3,213.00 $800.00 $1,000.00 $1,300.00 $1, 500.00 $2.000.00 $703.00 $0.00 $250 00 $300.00 $350.00 $400.00 $100.00 $200.00 $400.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500.00 $1,004.00 $1,004.00 $703.00 $903.00 $552.00 $552.00 $502.00 S451.00 $502.00 $451.00 $251.00 $351.00 $803.00 $301.00 $251.00 S401.00 $200.00 $602.00 $301.00 Fee Number PD 1 PD 2 PD 3 PD 4 PD 5 PD 6 PD 7 PD 8 PD 9 PD 10 PD 11 PD 12 PD 13 PD 14 PD 15 PD 16 PD 17 PD 18 PD 19 PD 20 PD 21 PD 22 PD23 PD 24 PD 25 PD 26 PD 27 PD 28 PD 29 PD30 PD 31 PD 32 PD 33 PD 34 PD 35 PD 36 PD 37 PD 38 PD 39 PD 40 PD 41 POLICE Fee Name ARO Dog License, 1 year unaltered Dog License. 1 year altered Dog License, 2 year unaltered Dog License. 2 year altered Dog License, 3 year unaltered Dog License. 3 year altered Dog License Replacement Jurisdictional Transfer of Dog License Animal Quarantine Release Animal Relinquishment Dead Animal Pickup Tranquilizer Guard Dog Permit Non -Allowed Animal Permit Service Alarm Permit Second Response Permit (loud music, parties) False Alarm Response (NCMC 10.45.130) 3rd 4th 5th 61h 7th+ Special Events - Profit Special Events Nonprofit Parking/1raffic Control - Profit Parking7Traffic Control - Nonprofit Fingerprinting - DELETE Negligent Vehicle Impound/Release Ticket Sign Off Vehicle Repossession VIN Verification Research Hourly Rate Admen/Doc Subpoena Admin Fee Deposit Disposition of Subpoena (refundable or recov Accident Report ($0 for person involved) Crime Report ($0 tor person involved) Request for Report ($0 for person involved) Record Check/Clearance Letter/No Record Photographs - CDs 33mm 1s1 pholo Additional photos 'PRA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's 14 Fee $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $1300 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $75.00 $50.00 $6.00 $76.00 $76.00 $ 76.00 $30.00 $153.00 $50.00 $ 75.00 $100.00 $156.00 $200.00 $103.00 $103.00 $56.00 $56.00 $0.00 $124.00 $0.00 $8.00 $77.00 $60.00 $42.00 er $150.00 $13.00 $13.00 $13.00 $20.00 $19.00 $5.00 $2.00 schedule) PLANNING Fee Number Fee Name Fee PL 1 Dev Annexation $9,940.00 PL 2 Approval of Plans $7,890.00 PL 3 Coastal Dev Permit w/ Pub Hrg $9.9410.00 PL 4 Coastal Dev Permit w/o Pub Hrg $8.730.00 PL 5 Code Amendment $9.940.00 PL 6 Conditional Use Permit $7,890.00 PL 7 Consistency Review $10,130.00 PL 8 General Plan Amendment $9,940.00 PL 9 Initial Study $7,270.00 PL 10 Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment $9.940.00 PL 11 Planned Development Permit $7,890.00 PL 12 Planned Unit Development $8,340.00 PL 13 Preliminary Site Plan Review $2.840.00 PL 14 Request to Initiate General/Specitic Plan Amendment $6,430.00 PL 15 Specific Plan $9.940.00 PL 16 Specific Plan Amendment $7,740.00 PL 17 Substantial Conformance, Council. Commission $5.660 00 PL 18 Substantial Conformance, Staff Review $3.690.00 PL 19 Time Extension w/ Public Hrg (CUP, PD, PUD. Variance) $5,710.00 PL 20 Time Extension w/o Public Hrg (CUP, PD, PUD, Vanance) $4.990.00 PL 21 Variance $8.020.00 PL 22 Variance SFR Owner-Occ $8.020.00 PL 23 Zone Boundary Determination $8.020.00 PL 24 Zone Map Change $9.940.00 PL 25 Doc Design Guidelines $10.00 P1. 26 General Plan Map/ Base Maps $40.00 PL 27 General Plan Text $10.00 PL 28 Housing Element $10.00 PL 29 Land Use Code $10.00 PL 30 l andscape Guidelines $10.00 PL 31 Local Coastal Plan $10.00 PL 32 National City Overview $10.00 PL 33 Planning Commission Agendas (Annual Subscription) $0.00 PL 34 Subdivision Ordinance $10.00 PI 35 Zoning Map $10.00 PL 36 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) $13,410.00 PL 37 Misc Appeal, Project Processing (non- refundable) Project $3,710.00 PL 38 Appeal, Site Plan Review Denial of Owner Occupied SFD $3.710.00 PL 39 Historic Site Designation $5.050.00 PL 40 Home Occupation Permit $220.00 PL 41 Interpretations $5.800.00 PL 42 Large Family Day Care $310.00 P1 43 Zoning/ Rebuild Letters $220.00 PL 44 Signs Banners , Administrative Fee $40.00 PI. 45 Banners, Processing (reimbursable) $1,975.00 PL 46 Modification, Nonstructural $40.00 PL 47 Painted Wall Sign $40.00 PL 48 Reface Sign $40.00 PL 49 Subdivision Certificate of Compliance $2.690 00 PL 50 Lot Merger $2.690.00 PL 51 Street Vacation $8.900.00 PL 52 Street Vacation Initiatiation $4,040.00 PL 53 Tentative Parcel Map $6,500.00 PL 54 Tentative Subdivision Map $6.500.00 PL 55 Time Extension, Tentative Parcel Map $9,940.00 PL 56 Time Extension, Tentative Subdivision $3.840.00 PL 57 Research Fee $180.00 PL 58 'PRA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) Ito FINANCE Fee Number Fee Name Fee FIN 1 Admin Business License Admin Application $21.50 FIN 2 Business License Admin Renewal $10.50 FIN 3 Pet License Admin Fee per animal $17.50 FIN 4 Business Business License Duplicate $10.00 FIN 5 Business License Name Change $11.00 FIN 6 Non Compliant Audit $15.00 FIN 7 Business License Change of Location within City $50.00 FIN 8 New Business License Processing $50.00 FIN 9 Used Dealer State License Processing $50.00 FIN 10 Identification Card $10.00 FIN 11 Certification of Subpoena Copies $10.00 FIN 12 Copies Certified Business License List $50.00 FIN 13 Budget Booklet $50.00 FIN 14 CAFR Booklet $50.00 FIN 15 Return Check 1 -10 days $25.00 FIN 16 Misc 10+ days $35.00 FIN 1/ each additional 10 days $10.00 FIN 18 Record Search $2.00 FIN 18 over 10 minutes per hour $15.00 FIN 20 Inspection Fee (TUP's, field) $50.00 FIN 21 Garage Sales Permit $5.00 FIN 22 Business License Appeals S25.00 FIN 23 Extension of Going out of Business Sale $50.00 FIN 24 'PRA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) FIN 25 Taxi Cab F'ee Schedule Refer to resolution Admin Annual Fee per vehicle FIN 26 Application Permit App FIN 27 Plus each permit in excess of one FIN 28 Plus additional charge if applicant is a corporation FIN 29 Licensed to operate in NC by MTDB as of 12 7-04 Operational Request FIN 30 Transfer clearance FIN 31 Jitney route change or additional route request FIN 32 Text stand request or jitney zone if installed FIN 33 Fictitious name change FIN 34 Plus per vehicle FIN 35 Color scheme and radio service change FIN 36 Plus per vehicle FIN 37 Rate of tare filing per company FIN 38 Plus per vehicle FIN 39 Replacement vehicle (more than one per permit per year) FIN 40 Add corporation officer (each) FIN 41 Addition. deletion, or change of stockholder (each) Radio Services FIN 42 Initial review of new service organization FIN 43 Name Change 2004 229 $100.00 $3,000.00 $300.00 $500.00 $0.00 $200.00 $250.00 $250.00 $100.00 $10.00 $100.00 $10.00 $100.00 $10.00 $50.00 $100.00 $100.00 $150.00 $50.00 FIN 44 Medallion/Permit Reassignment Reassigning a permit from one existing vehicle to a different existing vehicle in the same company (DBA) or to a different existing company of the same permit number This does not apply to the replacement of an existing vehicle i e., when all permits are reassgned from an existing vehicle. Replacement vehicle fees remain as stated in 3.7 FIN 45 Permit transfer request from one person to a different person, same as fee item 3.1 Plus, transferee pays fee schedule item 2 (application lee) and item 1 (initial req fee) based on number of vehicles. $50.00 $200.00 Reinstatement of a revocation or Suspension FIN 46 Fee for an appeal from revocation, suspension, or related adverse $300.00 action, refundable if appeal is meritorious 18 COMMUNI iY SERVICES Fee Number Fee Name Fee CS 1 Athletic Field Lights - Resident per hour $10.00 CS 2 Athletic Field Lights - Non Res per hour $20.00 CS 3 Athletic Field/Facility User Fee - Non-resident per hour $50.00 CS 4 Athletic Field/Facility Maintenance Fee - Non-resident pe $10.00 CS 5 Tiny Tots- Resident $40.00 CS 6 Tiny Tots- Non- Resident $60.00 CS 7 Contractual Classes Revenue Sharing CS 8 Instructor 70% CS 9 City 30°i° CS 10 Street Tree Removal per tree- beautification $295.00 CS 11 Street Tree Removal per tree -essential $65.00 CS 12 Recreation Swimming $3.00 CS 13 Recreation Swimming 0-12 yrs $1.00 CS 14 Recreation Swimming Seniors $1.50 CS 15 Recreation Swimming Non -Res Children/Seniors $2.00 CS 16 Learn to Swim Program- Resident $25.00 CS 17 Learn to Swim Program • Non Resident $40.00 CS 18 Adult Noon Swim $3.00 CS 19 Adult Noon Swim Seniors $1.50 CS 20 Club Swim Team - Resident per month $300.00 CS 21 Pool Rental fee per hour $35.00 CS 22 Swim Pass (30 entries) $60.00 CS 23 Swim Pass (30 entnes)- Children 0-12 $20.00 CS 24 Swim Pass (30 entries)- Seniors over 65 $30.00 CS 25 Swim Pass (30 entries)- Non-resident seniors& children $45.00 CS 26 Summer Programs and Camps 25% of cost CS 27 Individual Children's Parties 100% Of Cost CS 28 Air Jumps $25.00 CS 29 Lifeguard Fee (Applied to Schools) - Per hour, per guard $20.00 CS 30 Lifeguard Fee - Nonresident $30.00 CS 31 Non•Resident Recreation Class. Program. Sport Participi $10.00 CS 32 •PRA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) CS 32 Tennis Court Rental Fee Non Resident(Leagi per hour $50.00 MLK FACILITY CS 33 Building Use fee (non-refundable, non-waivable) $50.00 DINING CS 34 South Room per hour $23.45 CS 35 North Roor under 150 people per hour $/0.36 CS 36 under 220 people per hour $87 97 CS 37 Fntire Hall per hour $117.26 DANCE CS 38 South Rooi under 100 people per hour $23.45 CS 39 under 160 people per hour $29.32 CS 40 North Roor under 300 people per hour $70.36 CS 41 under 475 people per hour $87.95 CS 42 Entire Hall per hour $117.26 KIMBAL SENIOR CENTER 161 CS 43 Under 150 people per hour $70.36 CS 44 Over 150 people per hour $87.9/ CASA DE SALUD per hour $23 45 CS 45 Kitchen per hour $10.00 CS 46 deposit $60.00 CS 47 Custodial' deposit $100.00 CS 48 per hour $22.00 CS 49 $35.00 • Custodial charge shall be charged on the following estimated attendance 1 100 person 101 - 157 158 - 300 301 - 472 473 - 630 1hr set up and 1 hr clean up 2hr set up and 2 hr clean up 3hr set up and 3 hr clean up 4hr set up and 4 hr clean up 5hr set up and 5 hr clean up 2v City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHUCK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINFD IHC Class _ IDC Occop..n YP! ti 1 Assembly _I-tiedeating lbealet fnt,,, A HAII - - - - A l _ _ASSombly--p,y.t R I)nnk - - it ant N1gnt1,13n H... - - A 3 A•.•. nb1,L- Ww,slnp Arno •..•mcnl ._ A,ca,1a C14n1c,, Ctv ,nnn,t Ft AI A 1 Asscmbfi-In,1,x5, 7.1n,1 V1!•wng Ale .n.1. Stahel()Rmk lew r. I'our! A Occlrpar,y. I,u.u.I Improvemet,rT - 13u9ne )-{;Lnu Ot4j'aben1 Bu'Sne55-09, t 1•_.uun9 It ll �1 -; ,k11JI Ohre QuSmrSS- rLyh lL•.2 Office - - - It QOct, l0.3ncy I, •,r ✓.I I"pro.a•m.•,11._ _ M'r. Inns !nc Project Size Threshold 000 51100 o 0(30 70 000 50 000 1011 000 1 00t1 5.000 10 000 Al 000 t:unstruction Type ConstruUq., Type IA. ITI MA. UK 111A, NIB. IV Base Cost Cot for Base ua Cost for @ Each @ Each IIresllold Addiional Threshold Arkktional Size 100 sf' Size $J 123 _ S79 5175 - 17.ti(15 }0 _ _ $6 7 _ S / 3 060n $5 l:rfi 59 960 15I 87_un SO 304I _S1S,147 _ $37,52G_ _7 _ $1261f1 Sit, 104� 5-444600 577000 548.334.1 $4R 6300 110 575 54.29E 510/ 3190 _ 5.3.580 58 589 $98 3640 _ _ 57 158 51.3 50/ _ $70, 1760 _ 511.256 520.525 550 2240 11 / 104 500W - $35,592 $60072(1 S1g'., ) 100,000 $65.6_ 28 5.4,5 6780 554 69U 1.000 $3 978 5103 5tl4U _ _51.773 . 000 5_000 S3_Ui 1 _G/ $955_920 S6 /2(3 10 _UU(1 - 512.85) S4144n _ S1'J /U'., _ 20 00J _ 519_55c $49 O: 30 $16 193, 50000 S34457 5570400 - OR 710 100000 563.371 5.611720 1171810 104)0 _ $4024 S10801Rn _ $3,35. 5 000 SR 145 599.9JW TJ39,4 10(300 511.14.'- 5.696960 511 1I8 20 UUU _ 570_311 5.57 19110 $1697G S000o 1.1S97n 5.2 '56020 - 52,3 915 1011.000 iw 096 $66 0960 5 ,5 113) _ 400 $1.57, _ 586 2560 11 310 2.0t) $2.05? S >t/25970 s2.4eu _ 4.000 54 504 _ $57 RS_80 53.754 _ 8000 %8_71) _ 537.7480- 55683 10 000 _ _$11 35U 548 6120 59 45A 40000 _ 171072 5516800 517.540 100 53.400 SI 12003W_ 57833 _ 100 57 8tlJ 51.1560 5960 _ 56 52,9 1 000 5.1 3 183 5699 1440 510 94 4 2000 _570_178 55839480 5161315 SOW _ 53;695 56190600_ 5314,4 10_000 563 b89 5686 8970S5/ 74 1 10(1 53,203 S10318G50 _ _SI6/3 5UU 5/.335 _ $9i•111400 __ $o .i 1000 _ S t 7 205 Sti1b W _n 111 _ _$10 ." 1 70W _S1R_666_ $533 33Fu _515 555 5 000 SJ46ti/ 55712000 5)8 R89 10 000 563 27/ 563? 2080 55/ 689 ',4k1 _ 53.30I10 $1309125 51 /56 1 5W $5.925 S5 //00 54 y_J8_ 5.000 _ 58 820 $89 88011 _ 57 35U _ is000- - S1.1.114 $5374U1, - S11095 75000 5.71 .1/5 $7425Uu_ 51.7813 50000 _53991,1 _ $798750 5137S1 1 0011 55iu7 5125 6400 5.4 251 :, 000 _ 5101/7_ s11a_9450 Stl 41!) 10UW S1S tl75 _58 SA?:f650 S13223 _ _ ?0W - $7 04. 11 I S44150 570 U9J SU 000- 541 611 $70 365U _ 534 694 InpO n n S7G,R1S 576875U S64013 5.900 510_J39 _ 134 8200 _515 291 _ l5 11n(1 _ 525. )UJ _ 171 3100S 1 OAS 3U_OUtI 543., 30 $ !T., 7R00 535 917 100000 T69.770 $14_40.13 _ 557 775 3c0000 _ SI_5 .4 711R?S $459_JUU _$IOO i2.3 'nn 000 513)0 547 14U� $IMi 41; 750 S1)J/ 5.1003110 _ 51031 r l5n S224U 5890:60 51 R5) 2 hull 53 354 _ 563 4840 Sl /re, S OW- _ 55 066 $1I 14360 S4 IT,/ _ 17 S00 _SA 204 $56 7960 $5 0)b _`_ n00011 _.tni 16121_ 7U SI7153 100 s1 ' Size 5133134E $2084 566883) _-54.205 541 1833 1.6 fi4n 5.11 7122 S 1/ U5410 $40 52.50 _ L_t') 4325 SR 1 9700 S58 4$0 $41 ti53) 150 OGUu $54 6900 $756 3_700 $79 3300 555 8/W S41 1300 343 l(10(1 $52 3I(1U 590 01 Sn _533 78(141 S5U own - - 5434'33, 110 U95 $17.600 $37 420 57.864 S5. /lb $9.W5 $13.603 521 723 $4:4 i52 $2.619 55.381 $4.5A7 - 513ni, S 22 'nts $42 248 S16R3 A 5411 58 894 511 541 S54) 2111r) S13 9tl0 01400 $44 061 $71 0805.5 51048 - _- $64 6600 --$i96R $4R2400 S31)4)3 131 4567 $4 54/ S40 51 W $41./000 _S1404A $9 i4 n75n S219X/ 5825 s 8143i S5 756 _$582t.'1Uu 58791 54866133 511,45? S51655W S2.. 35/2 4104) 'A5 793 _ 5859 873/5 $2 138 _ S811 700.1 94.890 i'.1R 3700 _ _ 5rt 117 _ _ $444 4733 51/ 444- S4/G510n0 S23 111 $515., 53900 _ $42 151 $_109 09313 _ _ _57.205 596 4750 S1951 S/49000 144 /833 SB H/6 -S6t 87 50 S_I 1 l•10 Snn 5675 573 675 $104 1000 53.44,1 $95 78/5 _ 55 751 _5;8637' _ Sln Sg1 548 6108 316 074 558 6375 37. , 55 _ S1i40125 5 il�n S190167 559 1150 _ _S 16 858 _ 543 S4.G/ _ SIR 753 528 GG94 _ 5,4ri !Rn _ 119 2/50 SUU 5R1 5.142833 $I571_11 Sd.159?5 SJ75 571 2330 _ 51..64 557 u. UU 57 23b S34563J 51 17 / _ S471300 _. 5'.46o 5.,1 Wino Cotlllo.ction Type VA, VH Ila•,e Cost Cosa for Each Th eshukl Additional 100 sl' S53 n117 548 /06; $34 544.7 525 0170 (1400 $37 4700 571 5430 565 5760 _ S46 7840 5:43 4A27 S40 LLUIn $43.7520 $69 0560 _ Sfi.l 773(1 S44_0'3fi0 533 I04u S_18 5600 i47 74R0 $72 0110 $66 624U Safi 4640 $34 /9/.1 540 lc30 S44 0t 40 55/ 5040 551/13U 538 597U 5251653 $3.' 4080 SJS I/UU 5747 2200 5/07 0640 .54NJ 4194n 5309 793/ 5413 240u $457 923o soy 9inn S17.19 J641() 5430 b9W 5355 5787 _5380 8000 _ 5471 5120 Stl/ 7750 S77 1t3011 S59 9/UI) $35 316, 549 5004) 553 15031 583 /600 S/6 6300 _ S's4 9104) 533 93t. S46 91 W_ 551 2)00 - _523 2133 547 540') - S_34 8531 S72 9J5b 51002W 531 4767 566 8740 559 3840 545 656e. S1/ 390, 537 8640 7 10 .511 - 540 8000 ZZ C./?(d0.i '4 1:3 AAA City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PI.AN CHECK & INSPECTION FELS COMBINED Construction Type Constnn.tinn Type IA, 113 UA, UB, IUA. NIB. IV Construction Type VA. VH Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost lot Ba,,e Co•,I Cost for @ Each @ Each f? Each IBC Prol«t Sire threshold Additional Threshold Additional Threshold Addltfonat Class IBC Occupancy Type Ihreshold Size 100 sl' Sire 100 st' Size 100 sl• F Cducatonal-Group Occupancy__ _ 500 52 /R/ _ $1405650 __ 52.323 S117 1175 11,85R $93 /in( • 6' persons up to 8,'• 1216 i4.1J. 2500 15 hv9 1129.0000 S4665 $10750710 __51/13 _St3000u_U -" 0 000 $8 824 591 7550 57 351 S, 6 46) 5 S:, tltl.l $61 1i 00 10 000 _ S13,412 5660650 _511.1 /6 <55 U54l 10941 5440433 • -- 75 W0 S23.321 _$7 645n._ _ $194J4`_0U553/5 515548 5524100 . - 50.000 542.083 5859650 515819 $716315 528.655 __ 5.5/ 311M1 �_ F _ Educabortal-Day Cnu• _ _ 300 f2.47/ f1786950 52.022 $1469125 - 51.618 51191700 • 5. Uuki cn uld'•r thn„ % U2 yrs _ 1.5110 14.571 5160.8900 S 3.801) S t.l.t 0/:dl _ SSO47 f10T.2000 - _ -- _ 10W _ 56.904 $110 7450 SS.R7l1 199 /tl)5 54.656 $798300 - -- - 6ll00 $10.577 $785050 - 58.8f4 1654200 57,051 $52316; - - -- - 15.000 517642 SI0t16h50 314.702 $83 8875 511.162 56/ 11181 ` - - - - -- 30 000 $37,M7 S109 1400 $27.285 $00 9500 S71 878 117 /WU F • 1 Factory 61Ju•,6'.4 6s"Lr.Ut• Ha[ar0 1 500 $4 5/2 $JI 2310 _ 51.8 t0 $26 0715 0/ 048 S20 8220 _ --• /SW _ Sti.446 $70 2960 $S.a/7 1555t10 14 797 5468540 -- - 15.000 511 71a _ $5:t 17W ` 19 70S 144 2800 51 RI? $ l`, A7'711 - - -- 30 000 _ $_19-6tin - 135. 7480 $ 16.407 _ _$29 7900 S 1 ' 17i, $13 8320 "" - - - -- - - 75 000 f10,775 $45 9480 _ S7`1 R11 SaM 79uU $/3 050 530 6370 15UUW S%0.236 $afi R740 558.5JU $64 5590 $46 824 531 71f.0 1 2 1-artory Industrial -Low Hat1,d _ 2.000 57,200 S// 4/13 _ $G.000 S64 5594 $4 800 S51 U4/C. ' - - --- - 10000 513 398 5094800 $11,1b5 S57 0000 58 937 046 3200 -- - -- - 20000 _S70 346 $52.2000 _ 5If,_•1f,5 $4 41,0W 513 IAA $34 8000 _ 4U 000 530 786 $11 5150 525655 $1% '1292 SM 524 077 113.1 100 000 550 895 143 /750 542411 11643/5 113 930 179 LUu 200.000 194670 $47 3100 S78.850 5394250 fba_UBU 531,5400 H•1 I Yyh Hazard GluvZ,11 1 _- 600 _ 57098 1693075 -- St 748 Ss/ /:,63 St 399 $462057) _ 3 (8)0_ 53.761 $5 t 12nn _ _13 135 151 1 W0 S2 508i_ $40 AA00 6000 5560) $4/ 5',W 14 GoU 1316250 _ S3 714 131 ,0W -- - - 17 000 _SA 45M1 _S28 M1833 1/.045 5.21 7161 S:, 636 _ $10 9889 In 000 _ 513._581 $39.2900 _SI1.119 _ _SS? •r4ti 34U54 1261931 -- -- . hU WO$25 368 $42 2800 S71_I4U 130 2333 516912 $78 18h: t:00 53207 ffUB hUWd 52673 $905000 _ $7,118 5r[4000 ,.. _..__ _.__0 .. _ _ _ • keaolly support combu:Gun _ _ _ 7 000 _ $SA 1d^ 596 AuSJ 14.8d5 _ S80 18i, _ S3 8/6 SCA 3100 11 -- _ - - - G12OOn00_ _ $8 /68 174 50 17 256• S61 '6/', _ 15 805 149 4100 0 113154 5.453700 01096/ SSi 30I'03 08./i0 530246/ -- --- 30000 _ S21 32) 561 4700 $ I/ /GU iSt 275U 514214 $404800 uU 000 $39.762 $66 7/00 5.3 135 555 1250 S70 h08 544 1000 11 4 _ Hull 11arard G,oup H•4 - _ 100 S1 83/ _ $109 `5450 f 1 531 5a1 7R'S - 11 125 573.0300 • Pose 8cahh ha7:+,d•, 1.500 $:t 152 _ 195 0760 $1 53% _ S v /3UU _ 12 101 55J 384n - -- -- - _ 3004) _ 54578 $77 0280 51.815 S0419W 53052 $511520 e UW S6.889 $41 7560 _ S6 i_41 _$:34 7962 S4.Sn7 S7783/3 1!, nUU S10647 S62S08U 58 d7)__ $520900 5/n9R S416710_ 10 U110 _ 520 023 Sfifi /440 SIG 606 Shy 6200 $13.349 $44 4960 1-15 __ wytlt l.uard Goup11•5 _ T 1000 $3858y S/625/0 53215 S_6354:5 575/I 5508380 ;elmCol0k ctor f abncatlun P&I1 5 000 Si, 906 007 4280 55 : 57 $',6 1411 _ S4.605 144 9570 - -- - _ 10000 _ S1U 2/9 1523680 58566S.:100_ $.685J 5140)20 -- -- 20000 115 10 _5312800 _512710$2618,6/ 5)0 344 520853' 50 000 . 524 900 543 2480 520 iho 530 U-100 116 60 0 _ _S7A A171i -- I00.001i S4u 524 546 5740 Sart i /n SSU %700 531 016 531 ntt1U 1 iu0 _ 15.378 3127 1270 14.162 11059350 51.589, 184 74130 5000 510463 5110601411 _ $8719 1963400 _S6."/'. _ 1770723 tJ 000 $16241 _ SB4 0240 S13536 5706200 S1U1/9 $560160 -- - -- 20000 _ 574.64h _ $557.9100 5::051_8 $482b_o% $16430 S38 f,05} - -- - - - _ 50000 $17018~ 1713640 _ S)S01G <_59l?UU 578017 Sd/h/bU 00.1)00 _ S/1.70 $77 7000 SFA /',U 104 7500 551 800 $51 BJUU InsGtuuon,ll-fi• 1.. , 3.,E urn ambulatory 1 000 $36.478 5147.5961 $5 198 $122 9969 S4 31) - -- -- -- - -- -- --- --- - _ $98 5975 In UW $12.382 $133510 Stu .,18 Sltt 3625 _ SR_0L_ $890100 S19.058 5.98265)_ S15881 51.' /15 15551005060 the9h4/S1''i5S419611__ 20.000 $ S4838 _53S 0250 S40 55u .$60 16,', 537 445 $55 10710 - - - S_OW_IOU 000 Sn0119018CJ S?S 1S0 S/', 1500_ S00170 _ $60 tun•) h.t Me,�,,N'k'- -0ep.uG„i-1.) .t tin,, Sly �r --- - • 1000 __ S3 /14� 584 054.1 f t0•» _ S%U U45') 52.470 _S',h UJb_n - -- - - 5 0iN1 - S- 0%u $?5 9600 S5 8'1, $,,., 3000 54 %1R 55Ub30)) tn0n _ Stu A.'4 55604n55'1u4: 54i, '003 S: 75U SJu 3500 20 n0!1 -- 5 t, 4,'8 _ $37412n _ 11S/S/ 53) 193} t10 vnh 124954: 50 U_UJ 52; 708 54/ 2800 523 09) 519 4171n _ 518 4,72 sJ I 5200 1Ut. 0')0 55) 14R S5) S4UO $47 •%'•0 545 -vun 5>12321 $342170 • no,. •1'G lu'um8t h.uard - In)u1ub. .1. II__- 1. • I.Y1'fm5 ambul3l0ry M•1 i.1.'.P C. In'' 3 f,';;,'08 9 38 AM City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & 1NSPEC (ION FFES COMBINED IBC Class IBC (hoc.. Jncy TYEe IA Mu, Jlll.le-Markel • • Merc-intd.• M.d.n 1r444ispern,n9 61 ,M Occupancy Tenant Inp_vn.a•. I Resldenu.e1 h. 41•41 1.1 Roaroln91(OUSt1 `H.l.4d• ..d Pc+manta! 2. 0'.4414-4js Apartment thxu..1vy 1.I..a•snare If / JH^,rJ.ylm_el-f't•rmanenl 1• ' L.•.tl Apmnn. nl 1101m40ry Trmestare__ _ _. Ow1.4.ra•,I.pn 110rncs R 1 Dwell s-Is.rl-,. n;r'1 Phase . _ nl Mailer P1,, ,ma. (fN:•II.n' 1 Tin mate Materah R..3 _ 1<•••A; 3l,I00 I ,e091t11611.Y'�MI_., 310, um AID 113/a•1 Const ucton Type IA, IN Construction Type ColeJtortion Type NA„ NB• I8A. NH. IV VA, VH Base Cast Cost kir Base Cost Grst he Base Cosl Cost kW @ Each a@ Each @ Lath Prop•cl Site Threshold Additional TMaslsuld Additional Thiesboid Additional Threshld _ oSize 100 sf' Size 100 sf' Sae 190 ¢' 500 _ 522874 $106.1600 57.354 $.90 IMO $1883 5/7 /400 _ 2 500 $4 991 _ f9'r 1040 _ •$4.160 S/9 4•70T1' - $3.328 $63 5.190 _ S 000 _ $7.374 $74 YO40 _ S6,145 SG2 4200 _ 54,916 _ $49.9360 Ili UW $11.119 $43 5520 S9766 $36 2933 $/.41.7 $M 034/ 25000 SI/657 $615600 S(4,l IU $.S( 3000 $11.7613 S41 086 SO 000 $33041 $66 0840 527,535 $5'10/00 $2Z018 SMt ll.56(1 100 5.4,673 $1.118 /6/5 _ 33.894 _ 3932 3063 _ $:3.115 _ 1745 8450 -- 500 -_ 53.148 31,019 4300 _ $/ 673 5849 5750 $6 099 $679_6200 1.000 r_ 514 745 _ 5737,5200 $11.8_71 '- 5614 6000 19 497 _5441 J'iRMI 7.000 S21 Cil11� SS17 9(VIO _ $18,017 - $471 4N / 514.47 3 _ S_341 YS.1.1 S nOn 137008 _Mi// 5700 $30 840 $5Z/ Y/50 r__ $24672 f4le3_801J 10.0()0 568.387 S683.86SU $56989 $569813/5 545.591 $4559100 500-- 52.196 5880725 S1M30-_ $733938 $1464 _ 3,58.7150 7 500 - $S 95R f 7A0600 13.1_YB �_ _Ni5 0500 _ S21r-tY $S7 6101 5 000 $5.909 _$fi0 '/560 _ $4 924 1'.i(1 7125 _ $_1940 $W 1 /00 1U 000 _ $8.922 S364700 $J 41S $30 391/ $S.'MR _ $24 1137 254100 $14.111_ 3,49 8900 $11 994 5.41 5750 $9.596 _ 5.31 2600 1- $17 910 $3S 8/0050.000 116.B6S SS3 73(N17.Jd� $44/)50 f3.455 SU13SU__1010 34.146 5103 4870 $2.764 568 98110 $8,785 $96240_56.904 - S79.090 _SS573 3,63 7160lUU _ 10 000 _ $13026 _ 567 6680 110.866 _ S_56 1900 $t3,1.84 _ 3.45 1120 . 70000 _ 319.793 5.48 4W_0 _ _ 516.494 S4U 336/ _7 R313.195 3311693 5U,1100 _ 534.314 35/ 9240 $:41595 $48 7/00 _1%)6 _ 5.38 6160 100,000 363.776 3.63 7760 S51,/311 552 7300S41,1134 $42 1840 1000 $3,995 $9,3 611n 33.3T3 _ $R_3%75 _ _ $26763 Sti6 4720 5 000 37 980 391 /9611 56650 176 081X3 S5.320 3,90 8040 100110 . 512,545 3,65 1600 _ 310454 _ 154 3000_ $R.363 5.434400 20,00 , 51906I _ 3465e40 515884 __$388700 5)2,70/_ Sit 0560 50,000 13J 03li 355 776(1 _ 177.S 1u S46 4800 521,024 3')/ 1840 100043 i I- S60. J24 560 9240, S5(1.770 150 77UU T 340 616 $40 6160 1.000 _ 37.856 348 7230 3,2 3(91 _ 340 6075 - 31 91i4` $37 487_0 5 000 $4.805 141 8920 S4.W 5 S.341100 S3,1UW _5//_ 97W1 _ (0,000 $6 900 S.14 654'11 $5.750 5%8 RR(1(1 :1,600 $73 1040 '/fl,(lO) SIO 3813 S17 W80_ $R 633 $14 8/33 K.010 11I 898r 54l000 _ $1572_0 $27.91/0_511400_ $232600' _ 510.480 $186080 _ 10000U 5796/6 _ 5216760 321 /3(1 571 7300 $19./8.1 Sfn )84n __ 1.500 14./66 $1/08575 $3.971 $1423813 $3177 __5113405(1 7500 $6.474 $1/0 /850 $5.395 $101)ti:r17 _$4.316 SW 5/33 - 4 U00 58 285 3,133 U350 56.905 5110 W7S 35,524 $08 6900 5 U00_ 19616 $118 3950 $4 (111 _ 198 6G25 _ S6i,4 t� $ 78 9300 7,000 j11984 31375950 3Y YWi $1t04958 _519/ty SR83167 10000 $15'962 3,1516150 $133U1 $1/10175 $10.641 11064100 _1,500 $7.M7 $640300 57,039 $/1107`dl_ $1,637 $SIi 0200 /_•rl l0_ _ $3.288 $488_=5U_ _ S2.740 StU_G8/S -_ $2.192 f32:+`.1W 1 UOII _ _ 54.020 557 45U0_ 51.350 $4/_8/50_ _ 37,680 $38 3000 0631 SA.595 $46 94_5U S1 A29 140 1815 _ _$3,0i3 $32 G300 /15)0 55.573 S595200 146,5 S490000 _ 3,3./1166_ 5396800 10 000 -S / 350 S 7 3 5900 S6 1.3 I _ $6 13250 _ Si 906 $49 0600 _ 1 SU0 $4 416 _ $15 3 6000 f_3 GAU _ $128 0000 S/ 944 1 f 02 4000 2 500 $'� 9S7 S95 7650 $4 9t41 _ _S /9_3875 1S.9ti8 $6.1 _51(Nl 4 001 $7 381 $109 S150 $6.151 _ 491 767', $4,920 _S/3_011M1 s toll _ $84/6 594 i:i..0 _ 57063 $7396/S _ $565) $631)00 IOW- _3103/1 51t20050 _ S8.642 3933375 3,6014 3,7467011 10000 _ 513.131 513/ 3100 511,1/3 S1144250_ _ 19 i54 3,91 5400 1 000 _ 55 0't7 5118 3170 _a 1 19A _ _S98 67Y� _ 33 358 578 8380 5000 S9.1/ 5107 5_440 Sit I4.1 i896700 16514 fr'16960 -- 1t1.000 sr, 149 1/8 1120 512.624 365 76O0 110099'- S513'7060 _ %0 000 _$22 380 'x1 U011 $39. 102 100000 _ Si/.124 I,000 _ S •(491 5000 $s817 In 000 jd .NY 70 o0(1 S1/53U 50000 $18 855 1110 0011 _. $15 700 15.1740() 519,150 144 /83.1 _ 515320 3,35826/ $66 4440 $ 17.585 555 37013 3.26 168 144 79103 572 3240 $no.2i0 3,601700 $48 /16 S48 2160 S58 11500 S/ 904 $48 8750 5/ 32/ $39 1000 350 7500 14 U61 341 6/50 11891 S11 5000 L31 80110 1/, 956 _ S14 9083 S5,566 $// 9767 $71 I1/00 510448 _ 3,1/6583 35,359 114126/ $331,WO_ $15746 5280083 3*2597 5224067 $35 70W 5/4 /41 $79 7500 _5/.t 8n0 $73 8000 IdAX6;1111; Im Zi (471d08 9 18 AM City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction I ees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION I FFS COMBINED IBC Class _ IBC Occupancy Type i 1 Hrpbr (i.Yayr: "Autry t H�3h H.v.ud) 2 Stony,; . Low H.,/.011 Coo_shuctron Type Construction Type IA, IB UA, MB, IMA, IUH IV Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Coss for @ EaU1 (.a Each Pro,ect S{zc Tlwc hood Additional Threshold Additional rlreshok1 Size 100 si' Size 100 st' -__ 500 32.565 3994250 32.137 3878547 2.500 34,553 387 5900 3`1 /94 Si/ 991/ 5,000 36 4 t 368 580C 15 619 357 1500 10.000 310.1/z S40 2367 $8 477 S33 5306 25.000 516,208 356 4500 S 13 506 547 0417 50.000 $30,320 360.6400 52576/ 350 bald S 2 Slor.ur-1 OW Hvanl Parking Garages • open or Enclosed • Other Tenant Improurmcrd-, SHF l L BUIL01N6S D Shell Bldg l3us,nc:-P,ul,_:.v u, 4 (Mu r` - Olhn SI. UHudin a� - Construction Type VA, VB 1.000 33.331 361 6620 37 /76 _ _ 351 3850 5.000 __ 55.798 ___5538440 34.83/ 344 O70U 10 000 _ $8 4917 _ 342.9960 S7.075 335.8300 20 000 312.790 324.1280 S 10 658 S20 1067 50.018.1 320.020 335 1120 316600 S79 7600 100.000 337.584 337 5840 _ _ Sal :120 531 3200 1.000 32.953 156 0600 _ 32.461 34G 7 167 5 000 35,195 S49 2200 54.329 341 0167 10000 37656 338 8600 16.180 337 3631 20.000 311,542 322 36n1) 19 nitf 31t1 u333 50.000 518,760_ 531 BBUU 115108 S26 5667 100.000 534,191 334 1900 S28 402 _ 328 4017 600 12,307 560 0700 31.7172 366 /2:41 3.000 34.228 371 4300 S3 524 359 S250 ri 000 _ 56.171 _S'.r4 3450_- - 35.309 145 2875 17000' _S9.U37 5339900 _ se.027 528325n 30.000 315 /S0 S45 270(3 31:1 I25 S:)/ /!5U 60.000 329.331 $411 88181 5J4 11.3 Sou 7375 1U00 5.000 )0.000 !O 4)00 50 UOU 100.000 1 000 5 000 in04) 7o uuu 50.000 t 00.000 S 3.896 37.239 S 10.98G SIC 62? 327 456 $51 036 S83.5A00 S/4 94(l0 _S:,G 364U $36 1120 S47 1600 S51 0360 33.087 i pry 310 tJsu SIG 359 $26 52o $49. 45' fn 1 0450 5/J0150 S55 2900 S 33 8:'0n 54S A/00 $49 4550 S1.24/ S6.U33 $9 155 513852 S77 6811 31153U Si 323 SG.024 S9.025 313631 112 1 UU 141 213 Base Cost Cost for Each Threshold Additional Size 100st' S1 /10 5662833 S303G S50 3933 34.495 1,45 7200 36,78) S26R744 _ S 10ROS S3/ ti3.1 i S/g/1'3 340 4267 17_221 $41 1080 33.865 $35 8960 35660 $286640 -- SR 5/5 $160853 3.2:14080 325 056 325.0560 31.'368 $37.1733 11.4 3 $S? 8133 $511)4 3259U6/ - S7.69S S149067 $121437 $212511 _ S77 01 17/ i (.1 S1 :,Sa _ SS.t 38U0 $2 819 347 6200 34247 S362100 Sri 4,1�-- $225510 S1050J S30 1600 319,554 S32.5300 S4144411.01) 31 597 355.7200 SGI 4500 S4 826 $40 95n,' 3469760 Si 124 S17 5:61 S10 0n31 _ 31I UB/ _ _ $24 U747 $:14 3000 S 18. 304 $31 4400 142 5300 $34 024 S34 0240 SC75375 S2559 $540'OO 360 0 i 25 34 F?0 348 0100 $46 0/tin Si //J 1J6 Ob00 S1A JlSU _ $10.9G, 3225800 339 2250 317.680 _ S30 5800 S41 2125 312.11n 332 9;ot Lads .,I, I.IK, . 1 1110 •.y.1110 I, r`I o, 1,0,t,0r, B,ereo up 10 trle (le ti IUghc'21 lu,.pr3 '.Ve lwcsnold 1.1AXIt.1U5, Inc 2 `J G/2: ,1.18 .1 15 74,1 Fee Number BD 1 BD 2 BD 3 BD 4 Building MEPs Fee Name ADMINISTRATIVE FEES Travel and Documentation (standard) (2 trips) Travel and Documentation (each additional trip) Permit Issuance Construction & Demolition Admin Fee MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Mechanical Plan Check (subject to hourly rate) Fee $89.00 $59.00 $59.00 $1 18.00 BD 5 Al C (Residential) $29.00 RD 6 Furnaces (F. A U. Floor) $29.00 BD 7 Heater (Wall) $29.00 BD 8 Appliance Vent / Chimney (Only) $19.00 BD 9 Refridgeration Compressor $59.00 13D 10 Boiler $59.00 BD 11 Chiller $59.00 BD 12 beat Pump (Package Unit) $29.00 BD 13 Heater (Unit, Radiant, etc.) $29.00 BD 14 Air Handier $29.00 BD 15 Duct Work only $59.00 BD 16 Evaporative Cooler $29.00 BD 17 Make- up Air System $59.00 BD 18 Moisture Exhaust Duct (Clothes Dryer) $9.00 BD 19 Vent Fan (Single Duct) $9.00 BD 20 Vent System $29.00 BD 21 Exhaust Hood and Duct (Residential) $29 00 BD 22 Exhaust Hood . Type I (Commercial Grease Hood) $59.00 BD 23 Exhaust Hood - Type II (Commercial Steam Hood) $59.00 BD 24 Non- Residential Incinerator $59.00 BD 25 Refrigerator Condenser Remote $59.00 BD 26 Walk rn Box / Refrigerator Coil $59.00 zL9 BD 27 BD 28 BD 29 BD 30 BD 31 BD 32 BD 33 BD 34 BD 35 BD 36 BD 37 BD38 BD 39 BD 40 BD 41 BD 42 BD 43 BD 44 BD 45 BD 46 BD 47 BD 48 BD 49 BD 50 BD 51 BD 52 BD 53 BD 54 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Electrical Plan Check (subject to hourly rate) New Multi•Family Single Phase Service (per 100 amps) Three Phase Service (per 100 amps) All Other Types of Construction 15 or 20 amp - First 10 circuits (each) 15 or 20 amp - next 90 circuits (each) 15 or 20 amp - over 100 circuits (each) 25 to 40 amp circuits (each) 50 to 175 amp circuits (each) 200 amp and larger circuits (each) Temporary Service (each) Temporary Pole (each) Pre- Inspection (per hour) Generator Installation (per kW) PI UMBING PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Plumbing Plan Check (subject to hourly rate) $39.00 $59.00 $19.00 $9.00 $5.00 $29.00 $39.00 $49.00 $29.00 $29.00 $11800 $29.00 Fixtures (each) $9.00 Gas System (First Outlet) $19.00 Gas Outlets (Each Additional) $9.00 Budding Sewer $29 00 Grease Trap $29.00 Backflow Preventer More than 5 $19.00 Backtlow Preventer - each additional $4 00 Root Drain - Rainwater System $59.00 Water Heater (First Heater) $29.00 Water Heater (Each Additional Heater) $19 00 Water Pipe Repair / Replacement $19.00 Drain Vent Repair / Alterations $19.00 Drinking Fountain $29.00 Solar Water System Fixtures (solar panels, tanks, water treal $59.00 Graywater Systems (per hour) S118.00 Medical Gas System (Each Outlet) $9 00 27 Building Misc Fee Number Fee Name Fee BD 55 Abandoned Building Inspection Fee $178.00 BD 56 Activity Permits BD 57 Specal Use Permit $350.00 BD 58 Temporary Use Permit. Type A $237.00 BD 59 Temporary Use Permit. Type B $110.00 Antenna - Telecom Facility BD 60 Equipment Container $653.00 BD 61 Cellular/ Mobile Phone, free- standing $475.00 BD 62 Cellular/ Mobile Phone, co- location $415.00 BD 63 Appeal of Abatement Notice $475.00 BD 64 Awning/ Canopy (supported by building) $296.00 BD 65 Balcony Addition $475.00 BD 66 Building Moving Application Fee $831.00 BD 67 Carport $415.00 BD 68 Change of Occupancy $623.00 BD 69 Close Existing Openings $237.00 BD 70 Compliance Inspections/ Reinspections $237 00 BD 71 Condo Conversion $475.00 BD 72 Covered Porch $593.00 BD /3 Deck (wood) $534 00 BD 74 Demolition Residential Partial Demo (flat fee) $100.00 BD 75 Demolition- Residential $178 00 BD 76 Demolition- MultiFamily/ Commercial $296.00 BD 77 Document Research Fee $59.00 BD 78 Door- New $475.00 BD 79 Drywall $1 18.00 Fence or Freestanding Wall (non masonry) BD 80 >6 feet in height $267.00 BD 81 Each additional 100 If $29.00 Fence or Freestanding Wall (masonry) BD 82 >6 feet in height $356.00 BD 83 Each additional 100 If $59.00 Fireplace BD 84 Masonry $267.00 BD 85 Pre- Fabricated/ Metal $207.00 BD 86 Flag pole (over 30 feet in height) $296.00 Garage (Residential) BD 87 Attached $415 00 BD 88 Detached $415.00 BD 89 Greenhouse (non- commercial) $415 00 Housing Inspection Fees BD 90 1- 3 Units $118.00 BD 91 4- 10 Units $148.00 BD 92 11- 15 Units $207.00 BD 93 each add/ 115 Units $89.00 BD 94 Insulation $296 00 BD 95 Lighting pole $296.00 RD 96 each add! pole $59.00 BD 97 Mobile Home $534.00 BD 98 Mobile Home, double wide $593.00 2° BD 99 Partition- Commercial. Interior (up to 30 I. f.) $168.00 BD 100 Additional partition $9.00 BD 101 Partition Residential, Interior (up to 30 I. I.) $168.00 BD 102 Additional partition $9.00 BD 103 Patio Cover $475.00 BD 104 Wood frame $475.00 BD 105 Wood frame (with Calcs) $593.00 BD 106 Metal frame $475 00 BD 107 Photovoltaic System $415.00 Pile Foundation BD 108 Cast in Place Concrete (first 10 piles) $475 00 BD 109 Additional Piles (increments of 10) $178.00 BD 110 Driven (steel, pre- stressed concrete) $534.00 BD 111 Additional Piles (increments of 10) $237.00 BD 112 Pre- Plan Check Appointments (first hour) $118.00 BD 113 Pre- Plan Check Appt (each add"' 1/ 2 hour) $59.00 Remodel- Residential BD 114 500 sf Single Story $593.00 BD 115 Additional Remodel $29.00 Re- roof BD 116 Tile/ Shake - first 500 sf $415 00 BD 117 Each additional 100 sf $9.00 BD 118 Comp/ Metal - first 500 st $415.00 BD 119 Each additional 100 sf $9.00 BD 120 Root Structure Replacement $534.00 BD 121 Each additional 100 st $48.00 BD 122 Residential Re- Plumb (Flat Rate) $207.00 BD 123 Residential Re- Wire (Flat Rate) $207.00 Room Addition-- First Story BD 124 Up to 500 sf $712.00 BD 125 Each addition per 100sq ft $28.00 BD 126 Up to 500 sf (w/ Calcs) $890.00 BD 127 Each addition per 100sq ft $38.00 Room Addition- Multi- story BD 128 Up to 500 sf $950.00 BD 129 Each addition per 100sq ft $28.00 BD 130 Up to 500 sf (with Calcs) $1.128.00 BD 131 Each addition per 100sq ft $38.00 BD 132 Sauna- steam $207 00 BD 133 Siding $178.00 BD 134 Additional siding $19.00 Signs BD 135 Pole Sign, non- electric $296.00 BD 136 Pole Sign, Electric $326.00 BD 137 Wall/ Awning Sign, Non- Electric $207.00 BD 138 Wall. Electric $296.00 BD 139 Skylight $207.00 BD 140 Spa or Hot Tub (Pre fabricated) $178.00 BD 141 Stairs- First Flight S178.00 BD 142 Each additional flight $29.00 2� BD 143 Storage Racks BD 144 over 8' high (up to 100 If) BD 145 each additional 100 If BD 146 Stucco Applications RD 147 Additional Stucco Application Swimming PooV Spa BD 148 Gunite Master Plan Coord Prod. Unit BD 149 Each Additional 100 s. f. BD 150 Commercial Gunite pool (up to 800 sf) BD 151 Commercial Each Add.' 100 s. f. Window or Sliding Glass Door BD 152 New Window (non structural) BD 153 New window (structural) BD 154 each additional non- structural window BD 155 each additional structural window BD 156 BD 157 BD 158 BD 159 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FEES. Standard Hourly Rate Research (per 1/ 2 hour) Supplemental Plan Check Fee Supplemental Inspection Fee BD 160 Emergency (Non- Scheduled) Gall- Out Fee BD 161 After Hours (Scheduled) Call- Out Fee BD 162 Each additional hour BD 163 'PRA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee $268.00 $29.00 $237.00 $29.00 $475.00 $39.00 $564.00 $39.00 $168.00 $255.00 $27.00 $27.00 $1 18.00 $59.00 $1 18.00 $118.00 $475.00 $237.00 $118.00 (see Clerk's schedule) CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CITYWIDE USER FEE UPDATE STUDY REPORT MAXIMUS IIFI RI SC COvlkn N[ vl Vint TIFF PIWIL' JUNE 24, 2008 3 REPORT CONTENTS TRANSMITTAL LETTER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Background and Approach 1 User Fee Definition ... ... ........ ..._ _.... ........................ .... _ 2 Revenue Results ..... 2 Special Finance and Budgeting Treatment 3 General 1 and Support Requirements . _ 4 Report Structure 5 USER FEE SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY 6 Scope 6 ............ Methodology 6 Process Analyhcs II Model 7 NEXUS Model Su National City's Overall Issues .__ .._ ....... ....._.__... 11 DEPARTMENT -SPECIFIC FINDINGS AND RESULTS 12 Budding Functions 12 Budding Issues 17 Building Staffing Results 12 Building Revenue Results 14 City Clerk I unctions 11 City Clerk Issues 17 ............................ City Clerk Staffing Results . 1 7 .. ..... ................ City Clerk Revenue Results 19 Community Services Functions 20 Engineering Functions 20 Engineering Issues 21 Engineering Staffing Results 21 Engineering Revenue Results 27 Finance Functions .23 Finance. Issues 23 ....... .......... Finance Staffing Results 24 Finance Revenue Results 25 Fire Prevention Functions 26 1 ire Prevention Issues 26 Fire Prevention Staffing Result~ . 27 Fite Prevention Revenue Results ...... ........ . .28 Planning Functions ..... _ ........ 29 Planning Issues... .............. ..... .... .. _ .__ 30 Planning Staffing Results 30 Planning Revenue Results . 31 Police Functions .... . 32 Police Issues 32 Police Staffing Results.. 33 Police Revenue Results ............. .... _ .... .. .. 33 USER FEE CONCEPTS AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES 35 General FeP Principles 35 Implementation Strategies 35 Factors Limiting Full Cost Recovery .. 37 Legal Framework in California 39 33 FUTURE UPDATES 45 Multi -Year Fees. 45 Recommendations for City of National City 46 CORPORATE BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE 47 APPENDIX 1: BUILDING FEE SCHEDULES New Construction Fee Schedule New Construction Revenues MFI' Fee Schedule Miscellaneous Fee Schedule APPENDIX 2: CITY CLERK FEE SCHEDULE City Clerk fee Schedule APPENDIX 3: COMMUNITY SERVICES HOURLY RATES Community Services Hourly Rate Schedule APPENDIX 4: ENGINEERING FEE SCHEDULE Engineering Fee Schedule APPENDIX 5: FINANCE FEE SCHEDULE Finance I ee Schedule APPENDIX 6: FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULES New Construction Fee Schedule New Construction Revenues Miscellaneous Fee Schedule APPENDIX 7: PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE Planning Fee Schedule APPENDIX 8: POLICE FEE SCHEDULE Police 1 ee Schedule 3�- MAXIMUS I1F.LPINf C!)VFXNMlWl V.Nvf nic !TON. • June 24, 2001.1 Mr luny Garcia Building Department (:it), of National City 1234 National ('ity Boulevard National City, C:\ 91950 1301 Re: Cith'v\ide Ilser Fee Update Study Report Dear Mr Garcia. On behalf of M:\XIMUS. I am pleased to piescnt you \.ith this report o1 the City of National City User Fee Update Stud%. \\'utkin} as partners with the City. v.c identified all costs associated with those ('it\ Departments participating in this stud., and \ve allocated those costs fairly and appropriately to all of the respective Departments' a n toes Fluthei , we included departmental support costs to ensure that all available applicable costs have been incorporated into the fee studies It should he noted that the final Cost Allocation Plan figures vvcrc not available at the tune that these fens %vere generated; therefore. the former rust plan aniuunis were used Significantly, we migrated the ('ity's last tee study to the ticw MAXI KRIS models. Process .Anal%tics II and the updated NEXUS for new building and file prevention In total. the City has an opportunity to raise an additional 1,1 7 million in annual lee revenue- a 215 percent Increase u\er cui rent te%cnuc levels, should the City Council adopt full cost recovery fees The revenue opportunrrics. by di%ision..u'e detailed as follows • fhe City has the oppotlunity to raise an additional $263.615 annually in Building tee tevenuc an amount that the General Fund is currently subsidizing the development community • The City also has the opportunity to raise an aeiditiunal $1.375 annually m (-111, ('letk lee revenue an amount that the Ciencral Fund is currently subsidizing the public ■ Similarly, the City also has the opportunity to raise an additional 'I '41,321 annually in 1-n^111eeting fee rev enue— an amount that the General Fund is coo ently suhsidrinir the development emmttunit\ ■ In Finance. inost of the fees \%mild eu don and \vouiit raise S133.055 fess in annual revenues • The City's Fire I're\enuun l tin v\ould raise an additional $91 1.727 .innn:rll% in fee revenue an amount that is cut rently subsidized to the development community • Planning would also generate an additional S ;2I.6h1 ur annual revenue, which represents the amount currently subsidized to the development community • 1-finally, the Police Department may rake 311 additional $203..4h1 annually in ice revennr \k'e want to thank your stall «hu participated in this study. particularly 'Cony Garcia. Joe Olson, and Charles Roe Not only did then complete the data requirements for their utNn dcp;trtmeut's srtrdy, hilt they also pro%ided cite, Al support and oversight for the Cato%%rde studies Sutccrely. Irian A. Poster. Senior Manager N1:\AINil IS 1.inancrd Services Division i 20 ,\uburn Boulevard. Suns 2000 Sacramento, (A 95X.11 -1154 Phone (91(0-X5-S102 .rr 305 Ias (916)-1Xi•t)I11 E-mail hrrantostcrrtr'nrtsimns com 3(0 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update It. MAXIMUS COST STUDY I he purpose of this study is to deli mime the full cost of nperalions and the maximum tees that may be asessed. given actual expendiluie tequncmants EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND AND APPROACH the City of National ( •ity engaged MAXIMUS to update the (•ity.s Citywide User Fee Study MAXIMS is untducted all of the depatuicnts' studies simultaneously Also. we updated the City's fees itoni 20(11 to the current model. that MAXIMI'S applies to user fees. These new models require additional information compared to oldei versions of tt,cr fee models, but they puts\ ide inure data in a more balanced fashion through these studies, we determined the full cost of seiv ices uttered by the specific areas for which user tees are cuiteutly being charged or could be charred. f ull fir, as used in this ieport. uic lurk. all legitimately' eligible direct and indirect costs associated with pioviduig each set ice. including direct stppoit costs tram other divisions, plus department and Citywide e overhead It should he noted that the (. try's new Cost Allocation Plan was not coniplrlcd at the time that this study was dune, therefore. the ptcvioucly av:nlahlc Cost Plan data were used These studies :tie neither financial audits nor operational rev iews of the processes and procedures employed h, the various divisions. The City's annual financial audit determine, whether financial transactions are accurately and fairly recorded in the City's books The fee studies incorporate these audited financial figures in the models. Operational reviews of management audits would determine whether t)te divisions might achieve efficiencies of economies by cniployini different business processes. While one of MAXIMUS' core pi acticc areas i, the conduct of uperattonal re\ iews, the City has chosen not to undertake such studies 31 this time. These user lee studies represent a snapshot of the ('it\'s current full cosi by sere ice and'or activity From this vantage point. there are no "good" of -bad- results. only a determination of current levels of expenditures according to the overall direction of the City Council. as expressed by their approved budget Although M \XIMIJS dud not rev few the efficiency or ettecti\eness of the cal rows rlivisiotrs. it can confirm that the tee Ieycts resulting limn these studies are a reasonable relieftiun of the ('ity's current cost strucuue. Cost dcicintinations result front aii essentially simple tornmila multiply a ptoductne broil~ rate by the number of hours required to complete the task It is the collect identification of the underlying components of rates and hours that gives the analysis structure and yarlidin. MAXItv1Us uses specially designed. proprietary software to ensure that all ope•ratiorial components are idenulicd and incorporated into the final determination. I he methodology emulates the principles of Activity Based Costing t.ARC1. which pto, ide fui the identification 37 1' �,• I City of National City �4.• Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS USER FEES User furs recover the cost of do nq husmcss u' exchange for the personal or tu,anc'al benefit recr-rver] ot (work components.'actrvlties. and the assignment ot dolhn (alucs to the resulting time allotments Once these costs arc identified. the final objective oldie study is the presentation of the results to the City Council for their decision. Cities typically choose to recover full costs of then activities (there an applicant for a drseIeuoIIIry sort ice (till obtain a specific monetary or personal benefit The ter schedules incorporated herein show the inaviruurn lice levels that the City may assign to each fee. The City Council may set the adopted tee levels at anv amount up to the levels shown It should be noted than the tees presented herein incorponuc the FY !Ulf/ MS budgeted expenditures. 1 he City prat '. ish to increment these tees tin expected cost increases in FY 2008-09 II should also he noted that the Community Services I leparintent opted to develop only hour ly rates for their statf. as opposed to full fee schedules 'typically, recreation departments operate 011 hourly rates and then apply those fully burdened hourly sates to its (vide ( awry ot acnvInes. consistent (eith City Council pricing directions. tchich are almost always helot( actual cost USER FEE DEFINITION It is nnpoltaut to understand the essential concept of a user tee —as opposed to other gnvemmenral revenue source. .ls 11.sed in (/seas" siuUu'(. a trcrrier I(' tun amount r lurrr!ecl /Or ei governmental artiwty or service that is performed nr the request nL ern(! ¶pees/ieallr for, a particular 'milt idual. hteslnr.'s or }croup. (lc nppnel'd to a u' I C fat the comnIunfh as a whir/c (•rnmple n/ the /ol men is a reyue'.St far a -nnitig change to initiate a rhea ht1J UIG's The a/'p/iri lit le ill he ginning a .sheer 1r economic hrnr%i1 final that zoning change- n benefit that ergll nor be shinel l'c the cninmuturc at !egg(' ,in e.tample oldie latter is pollee m /its ptotet:nurl, which 1c (nrriide,ed a community I, isle activity and 1e supported hJ ()liar lornic n/ rerrtuee. site), a( 1n vallntl REVENUE RESULTS The results ot this stud( le(ealed significant opportunities to increase revenues through user tees. Spccificallt. opportunities conic twin a Salle!) ot factors, which ale commonly found ((aim) these studies • Increasing Productive Hourly Rates to reflect lull cost • :\cknon Iedging the total ettort required to pro( ide a scn ice from the peI.pcetive of a Citywide of so( sec deliver (cross•depaitinental support) • Adding new tees Pace 2 38 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS REVENUE OPPORTUNITY The City may raise $1.7 ❑utlrun annually through (rill cost Iecovery ices In nearly all areas studied. we found an overall current subsidy prodded by the City to the fee -payers, iv: , the City is charging Tess than the full actual cost of providing sees ices leased on conversations vv ith staff. these subsidies rrllect :I mixture of birth intended and unintended choices. Most governments intentionally choose to subsidize some activ rues. but not others, and the models that MAXIMIIS de%clops allow for the continued practice of selected subsidization. I he results of the analysts demonstrate the full cost of prue reline each of the !elated sera services included in the study. estimated revenue from the current fee. and the resulting current subsidy. A sunuuaty of the Cu% •s revenue opportunities is provided in the table below. Revenue Potential Summary Current Full Cost Annual Department Revenue Revenue Subsidy Budding 5690.636 $954.271 S261.615 (cry Clerk 1,280 1_0s' 1.:7A Couuuunnv Set \ Ices Engineering 111,'HU .'64.')(1I I.U. t21 Finance 2U2.400 (,9.i45 III3.0 )1 fire 88,074 990,8111 011.727 Planning 2R0.794 602,457 ;?I 66; Pvhce 114.935 ;IH,?ntl 't1;.26s Total $1,491,699 $3,212.611 $1,720,912 As sham u above, the City is expending bS 2 million on user tee services. \vhile it recovers only $1 i million. a net subsidy ut.1.7 rwihuu how the General Fund. MAXIMUS typically recommends that City C ornt'rts establish user tie fevcls at 100 percent recovery rates fur fees that provide a diced, tangible belie tit. It the City Courted were to adopt a Lull recovery fee schedule. and it the ( atv were to experience the same level of service activity as it has in the pat. then the City would realize annual revenue increases of approximately $1.7 million. Please note that the Current Revenue figures in the table above wilt not match actual Fiscal year revenue. as they were computed by multrplyrn.2 the eurrcnt fcc Icvel, by the sampled unit volume to yield the full cost model. We do not use actual revenue in our equations due to tlminr', issues pcnntt aenk sty Is often recorded towards the end utnnc Fiscal year, but activ etc commences in the follo.vmg fiscal year Our ,approach provides an apples-to-:Ipples ni.nch-up lit analytical purposes SPECIAL FINANCE AND BUDGETING TREATMENT Should the City adopt the full recovery fee levels provided herein, then it is ohhgated to expend those revenues only for the purposes raised to do ()then% i'e would convert those user fee revenues into taxes. %%Inch ale Illegal unless the City %v ele to meet the voter requrrcntenis pro ided under Proposition 2.1X 1 he 31 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update I 1nlr� MAXIMUS OUTSIDE FUNDING REQUIRED The City w 11 neen to support these departments with $19 5 million m non• Ire revenue to support operations at current levels City needs to spend the funds it raises. allowing for only modest surpluses of deficits In any ggiv en year I he General Fund benefits flood full recovery tees because the revenues include full fundure for leave accruals, such as sick (cake and vacation. Hlstoiically. the t:iry has nut funded such leaves. and any unfunded regimen/cub \ele Incl. by default. by the General fund Thc City will not accumulate any additional leave liahility for those staff covered under these fees if it adopts hill comely lutes. The C•rty's I-mance Department will need to establish a funding mechanism that transfers the appropriate portion of user fee revenue into an account. rescue. or trust tined. as appropriate. to pay for those leaves when they are ultimately taken These models also incorporate a 165-day year period l'on\ cnuunal wisdunn assumes that there are 26 hi -weekly pay periods in a year: hoe er. there are slightly mute than 26 pay periods. as thi is not evenly divisible by 14 Indeed. agencies that pay bi-weekly, as does National City, encounter years \\ here there is a 27' pay period. and they must identify funds to pay for that extra payroll. The MAXIh11.1S models are based on ;65 days in .t vear. which equates to 26 07 periods. and which pro ides fur 2.086 work hours in a year (tor staff on a 10 hour work week) It should be noted that no usher ion} tell IruhillLrs were addressed in these studies. MM:\XIMUS assumed that the C-it\is Cost Allocation Plan would adducss lung -tenth fiat utcing needs, such as building replacement vehicle replacement. insurances, and other liabilities. Finally, the City hinds all development -related deli -itie. through the Lity 's General Fund Willits there is no requirement to do so, the Coy may wish to consider establishing a separate enterprise fund fur der eluptnent-ielated activities. Doing so would more clearly show the revenues and cvpen,es related to development activities. and would pro\ ide cleat insulation of the (ieneral Fund lion annual swings in activity experienced by development GENERAL FUND SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS I.:ul ycal.'sl,\XIMCS upgraded its user tee models such that they now pro%uic enhanced cost information While we ulways showed maximum fee and revenue potential. we also now report on the amount of outside funding that will he required by each of the division, in this study Thar are two prnuaiy lessons wily these di\ isions have costs that are not rcutnetahle through their n\\n tees • They provide services to other departments. and the other depannients must collect the re\ clue supported by those eftims • Within then budgets there ate costs that must he excluded drum tees. as those activities sue not related to fcc activity In the firmer c:ue..t Finance Depaitntenit may establish a charge or transfer of fluids to Rover those costs As ;in :ilternali\e the recipient deparimcnt, Ina\ 4 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update establish their own ter structures and charge their clients for the full cua of services, including those cost, of the divisions in these studies For those departments already included in this tee study. MAXIPIIIs has already incorporated the cross-depaitmental support into the recipient department's Ice schedules For non tee related activities, it is important to identify the Icvel of non tee revenue required to support the division or department In order to match revenues to expenditures, the ( ity's budget should show the level of support needed from the General Fund (or alternate reccmte.ourcc.) to tuns/ support departmental operations. A summary of these funding Iequirenrents 1, presented in the table helow Outside Funding Requirements Charges to Non -Fee Total Non - Division Other Depts Activities Fee Amounts [luilding )- S S- (:ay Cirri; 136,1 i/ I(111A7 :i,i1163 Community S r\nc. - - Engmcennt' 103.918-(33.7x1 <371A9 liname 904,717 9u1 / ;7 Fire I),SS6 I1.KS6 Plannrnc r2,966 t>i':, 40,1 Police 11.301 17.767,090 17.77,'Z 391 Total $367.817 S19.534,229 $19,902.046 thus. in total. the (ity will need to cwltiibute $19.i million from othei than user fce revenue to summit these activities. principally in the Police Departnu•ni REPORT STRUCTURE the complete fee tables, which show both current and full cost recover\ level., ate provided in the Appendices to this tepolt 1 he remainder of this report details the approach. nrethodoloi!lcs, and results of the NIAXINIUS fee studies the data sets that support the usct lee models ale on file with the City City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS USER FEE SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY SCOPE The pi iucipal goal of these studies was to calculate the full cost of peen ultnt' user fee services. including all direct. indirect, and support costs. Secundar objectives of the study included. ■ Structuring the tees to wilco accurately the pr.'ce,.es and orPaniiatiun of the divisions • Simplifying the tee schedule\ to make them easier to implement and understand ■ I?nsuting a connection bet r\yen fees and the cost of services provided. • Ensuring that the tee; are lu> ical and defensible • Providing a revenue projection lased on the full recovery of Cit\ costs to evaluate the departments' costs for user fee related sin lees. \cc employed our rigorous, rumen project apple, chcs and analytical in. hodnlogmcs \be based our analyses on existing data. when available, and on reasonable estimates provided by the tvspeeuvc departments. the similes focused on the actual costs of services. as the departments currently provide than We did nut examine or ev.ttt:rtc the effectiveness. etficicnc}. ur value Mahe departments' progianis, services. ur operations In shunt. \+e studied the costs of operations as they ;tie. not as they might he. Departments and divisions ;malyied included the following. • Building • City Clerk ■ ('omnuinuy Serviees (Hourly Pates Ordvl ■ I ngtncet ing • Finance • Fire ■ Plannuma • Police METHODOLOGY The approach, philosophy. and methodology of esker Fee Studies are as tmpottant as the final outcome \\ hdc the calculation of a cost of a spro tic use: fee is unpuuant• If is equally important that this number he defensible. clearly understood by staff. and useful foi iiupiu\ mug long lei III performance OM costing methodologies meet these entena bv. P,vrt Z City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS • Providing cost calculations that are traceable to source documents, and therefore defensible • Involving staff in a highly collabotatiti lashion • Developing costs from the "ground up .. • Identifying all costs assoccited ttith fees • Projecting rcvcnuc at "full cost." • including ,\dvanced Methodologies 1'EXL'S and Pro, p, Inuit II( ll • Identifying pricing issues that gill impact operational ellicien ics • Including an implementation strategy. • 1 aying the eruuudwork for operational iruplovcment Our costing process I, composed of Iwo computer model, -Prut : + . roof% tr, , I/ and NEXUS —each ot which incorporates the principles of Activity Rased Costing (We use different models due to the specific computational rctlunenrents ot each fee tvpc) \Vc used the Process Analytic, 11 model fur all departments except I3uilding and Fire Prevention. PROCESS ANALYTICS II MODEL At ris core, Process Analytics seeks to document the actual, full cost ot activities, products, and services. as well as to provide an understanding of that drives those cost,. \Vrth this knowledge. the organization is in a Netter position to deliver services faster, more efficiently, and more effectively In the NIA XIMI'S solution, our Process :\nalyucs II model delivers the initial knot' ledge, and our optional Performance Analytics services dclivei potential solutions A typical set of "cost drivers" is shown in the fullutt ing graphic sss$s Expenses Process Components Pry-Appikation Revocw Application Intake Application Review Set Conditions or Approval Review by Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit In this engagement MAXIMIIS worked with staff to identity and define those work processes that produce C it) service; for each slat f rncinhei, we developed houiI%rates that were hosed on true avail ihlc net twicis), and tthich inn laded all �3 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS direct and proportionate indirect costs 1 here are wren specific steps involved in data gather lug, under the process tit: II model I he seven steps are as t011oos' • Staff Hour Allocations. Stuff identify all budgeted positions. MAXIMLIS calculate, their total available hours. and from that amount. makes reductions fur all leaves and mandated reductions IN Budget Allocations. MAXIMItti works rvith statt to identify all budgeted costs and off -budget items that are to he incorporated into the model MAXIMUS also excludes costs that are not related to fee actively MAXIMUS then allocates those net costs across all staff to develop hourly rates IN Fcc Table Construction. MAXIMUS and staff review the cunent fee structure and revise it to meet the current and future needs of the do ision • Identify Dhisiou-Specific Processes. Staff define each process so that all staff may estimate their time according to the same iindcrstandine of that process. • Develop Time Estimates. Stall estimate the time required to complete each activity relative to each service. fhese estimates result in a comprehensive stiul of time utilization tor the entire division. Fur quality purposes. MAXIRIUS conducts a validation process to ccnty that estimated activity time Is relatively equal to actual time available for productive work • Overhead Allocations. Based on staff direction, MAXIMUS allocates all non ter activity either hack into thc tee stnietioc as an overhead of surcharge. of to an alternate revenue sourer (such as a charge to another department. General Fund support. etc ) • l'ser lee Heconciliatiun. Once all costs have been allocated to all fees. NIA XIMUS pcitornts a series of reconciliations to ensure that the data provid. d by the Coy :ire valid, reliable. and reasonable. Reconciliations include both :Litt hours and fee it itue. \s an example of the result: ut the tint' estimating process. thc titres and unburdened dollaus associated \vith Zoning tlup (:huny(..r are presented in the figure helot• rJQc x City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Process Times/Cost Example Deyp.Ipp 4 ening, Total Hours apChange . Activity Total Hours (0Demand Budgeted CoaW7lt. pie gets Cost Degtaed —:r .i•: r" _ 1.000 ' 2000 $49 :$97 P `• 2.500 y 5.000 $219 $437 k 20.000 40.000 $2 434434 $4.869 _.. h .,. �*^•�'-.":-.✓ _ .6.000 t • I'J• 12.000 $687 51.333 y ; :::,17.500 35.000 $2 208 $4 417 2.''' 4.000 - S12¢ .. $250 .. ' 3000 6.0 t $328 $655 ,SO .' ... 0.000 0000 . SO 7 , . 14: n r • $842 ' $1.683 r i ,0�500 t ; r „ 1 , t'' . S1 7 ..',, • 549 : ' $ 74 ,:S is r r .+l • : ' 2.'. ' •. 4.000. s•• St. 1` a' _ $281 :.4:,000 ., :O;r, :ZC...• S. :s_.. s0 r. 0.0'''.. 0.0001 ''., '. ,1.,: SO r. '.., • : t3.r't '-'. 44 : $890 ...�i • . , , Y'v. 0... 111 :SQ „,i.:'"' $0 et , 11 perIJraT • .,:> I iX•'.. IIMUyDllilL IMMEXES The example above sliti\ks the time allotment in typical case. Grr etch activity associated xc ith 7ontng Map Changes. 'Iltc Toral Ifonec rn• Demand column shows those same hours multiplied by the volume of activity experienced in the sampled time period. and the budget costs arc the costs extended from those hours. We then add to the costs above the costs of the Planning I)tc rsiun•\ internal overhead, cross -departmental support, crust -divisional support• and other selected support activities to establish the fully hardened cost (cc structure. MAXI\11IS also recommends, xvhere ver appropriate, the adoption of tlat fees instead of variahlc Time and N1:aerial (I (N91 fees. The four primary benefits of flat fees arc. • 1lat tees ale easier for customers rn budget• Mud: helps customer\ to plan their rxpenscs • flat tees arc easier fur the fits- to describe to customers. resullrnc in less customer confusion as to the actual costs of a project ■ State may cease tracking their time and expenses associated with mdi, idual pruleets, winch flees up srr.ntfrcant time that would utlrer„isc he burdened as an administrative ox encead ■ flat tees tend to ream er more tit a (ltv's cu•.t than Unre and material tees hccau:e start typically undetieporl time on therr project sxstems. NEXUS MODEL )turlding tees have traditionally been set based on structural valuatiuu. In 2004, NIA XIMUti moved the ('rry away trom xaluation based ter. risen)! the NLXUS model NI.XUS complies with Califnnna s tan(' other states') legal nnperatr'es calling for a direct relationship (nexus) het wcen tees Ice red and scr\ ices pro%ided 4") City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS NEXUS FEES Building Fees are developed based on square footage and type of constiuUion. not cnnsimction vutue (.cc C'ahturnra Uovcrnment Code §66014 and California Attunlc\ (ienclal's ()pinion 9'-5t161. NEXUS calculates plan checking.. inspection, -trades- component.. and miscetlaneons fees based on a combination of productive hourly. rates and standard times 10 complete tasks. scaled and modified by vatyule square tootage and construction t} pcs. This approach represents a distinct ch:ulte in fee calculation and adminiaralion. I he NI• XI IS model determines the appropriate fee based on typical square footage sizes and IOU foot rociesilents. The Tees recapture all plan checking. inspection. and Mechanical, electrical. and plumbing (N1111') costs for that particular protect We developed other ice tables To accommodate vannus •'rni'ccllancous" and NILI' activities. 1 he essential inputs to the NIA US model are similar to those identified in the Proses Analvucs II model :shove. Under NEXUS. there are six methodological steps to complete the model. as follows- ■ Staff (lour ,1lloca ' s. Staff identity all budgeted positions. NIAXfMLS calculates their total available limns. and Iroin that :,mount, makes reduction:, for all Ica es and mandated reductions • Budget Allocations. NIAXIMIIS works with staff to identify all budgeted costa and oil budget items that arc to be incorporated into the model Unlike the Procca Anal}tics II model, under NFX(IS a blended 'wilily rate is produced NIA XIMIiS mates blended hourly rates under NEXUS due to the complexity of tees by building type, square footage site ranges. number of work processes and activates. and types of fee schedules • Fee Table Construction. MAXIMUS and City statt rev ievv the emirtit tee struelue to select those building,types. sites. Juni file ratings that are typical in the City. In addition to those new construction type. NIAXIMUS and City staftgeueiate tee schedules for NlFP and miscellaneous activities that match the City's requirements. ■ Identify Division -Specific Processes. City staff define process steps fur both plain check and inspection so that they may esiintate!licir tune according to the same understanding of each process. ■ Develop Time Estimates. ( 'try:Lift estimate the unie required to complete each activity relative to ealti type ot construction or aril\Iry These estimates result III 3 cntnprehellSit sui d utunie utili7atioit for the enure division quality purposes, NIA XIN!US conducts a validation prone., to vend• that estimated activity time is relatively equal to actual time available for productive work • User Fee Reconciliation. ( ince all costs have been allocated to all fees Ni \ I N11;S per torius a series of reconciliations to cuisine that the data provided by the ( it} I. -alit. tellable. and reasonable lteconeiliatiuns include both staff hours and fee revenue 4(0 Fur P.r.e 1,0 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS NATIONAL CITY'S OVERALL ISSUES In the course of conducting these studies. MAXIrvIllti noted only tive issues that affected more than one di visum's user fees 7 hose Mice issues arc • The City', Cost Allocation Plan (CAP) is not yet in final Corm. for pu:puses of thus study, MAXIPIIJS used thc prior version of this study. • All of MAXIMl1S' emir associated with these studies were allocated to user fees, thus, thc cost of these user Ice studies will be recovered over the next five fears through user fee revenue at no cost to the (itr'' General Fund. • The C ity's finance Department should review strategies to recover all General Fund and iesery . amounts from thc tees that are generated Typically. finance I)epartments establish reserves or bust; to deposit revenues associated wits long -tern' Liabilities Iikc vacation and sick leave accruals. 27I pay period accnials. and amounts set aside to purchase fixed assets like the prolccted permitting system upgrade • Fur some departments. fully balanced revenues were nut available. just as %%rill the prier study In those cases, the Ice amounts arc based primarily on time estimates and costs as appearing in the budget. adjusted for off -budget items. • I he ('ity'e permitting systems do not all provide quantitative data in the format needed fur the user fee studies In those cases, MAXIMI 'S used proxy figures or omitted various model balancing routines, as required. The cuncut permit system is aging and dues not provide data that assists with the management of departmental operations. Also, integration with the ( Ay's financial system is not as dnect tit efficient a. it could he MAXIMUS encourages the City (o investigate upgrades to its pcnnjtting sv,icm -4} -1 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS DEPARTMENT -SPECIFIC FINDING AND RESULTS BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS I he Building and Safety Depa:Oncnt is responsible for the issuance of building permits, reviewing building plans for code and safer compliance. and providing inspection services BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT ISSUES I here were three operational issues involving the fluildtnr and Safety Department that melt noting. as follom.. • I he Building and Safety Depattutent relies almost c.vclu.itely on contiacturs for plan check functions lire use of cuntractuts assists some dines in addressing the fluctu.rtinf' itorkloaJs Inherent to delekrputeut 1)n the other hand, the City experienced a significant tuntocet of individuals who supponed the City's plan check function. thus corn minty ot sett tee and approach Wit. nut always achtec ed • A portion of the costs ot the Genet d Plan were sptwd between the Planning and Building models. The fiunldrng models received S 15.000 per year. which were spread throughout the building Ices • Included in the model ate costs tirr a I'entantation nt upgrade. The amorous added were $21.000 annually to er c years plus Sc),.;20 annually in increased maintenance BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT STAFFING RESULTS A. pan of our atidly.I , WC aggregated Rurhlrn^ and Safety Dcp:rrrmcnt s13t1 hours by type of acttc rtv. Specifically. we aggregated staff time actuss the following nine categories' • Stall Leave: • New ('onstnctrou Plan Check • Nccc ( onsttuctlun Inspection • t lEPs (Mechanical. I?Iectucal R Plumbing) Plan Check • MFP' (hlec'Itanrcal• Floctncal X Plumbing) Inspection ■ Ml.cellancons Items Ilan Check • Items Inspection ■ Support to Othct f)ep:inments • Non fee A.tty fries City of National City Citywide User Fee Update The chart belme shows the equivalent hull -time staftdet oted to c.tc h of these nine activities. Full -Time Equivalent (FTE) Staff FTE Use by Activity Type 80 70 60 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 1 �� Cr¢ ``lc Cr* c / / Q• \c aQy mac 'St \O 0 •-, eF�,/e e h 4s` SC' c�0,OVC re ,\er�oc TSUiO<� 14 ?' .s.e, �Qeeo� u• `cccc The chart above indicates that the Build n and Safety Department cw Ientl) allocate appioximately 1 h FIF. to Leak es. I ranunr'. Meetings. and Administration. I I FTE to Nctc Construction Plan (heck. 1 0 FTF to N'rtt (.onstntcliun Inspections, 0 ; Fri. to '1FP Plan ( heck. 0 (1f• FF to .III' Inspection. I) FTF to Miscellaneous Item I'l:m Check (1 x I I I. to Miscellaneous Items Inspection. 0 0 FTI: to Support to clthci Departments. . wf 0 0 El I. to Non -Fee ActIVIl cs Within New Constnic non. we also Irruke dots n the stet f allocations he residential teisus commercial activity (it is nnpossihlc to allocate t liscellancims and NI LP time to residential versus crunnieicial, ::race permit data are not tahulcired III Ihat manner). Of the ? 1 FTL- ttorktn,g on Nevi (•unsuuctton prolccts 1.2 1T1- sue allocated to commercial construction. tthtle II y I TI- are allocated Io rr;idcnti it construction I hese staff allocations .trc depicted in the _'raph P,cc 15 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS FTE Use —Commercial vs. Residentia Full -Time 0.8 Equivalent (FTE) Staff �a F�c� 0 43 F. yI,l \�C CP s�o ti y C O° BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT REVENUE RESULTS The cost analysis of Building tee related services indicated that the Department is providing a considerable subsidy to the budding community currently, the City is iecoceiing only 7? percent of its cost of providing huildnig iclatrd services The Citv's current (icncral fund subsidy is provided to Ncoi ('on,nuitiuii nr the amount of S I XX•t f,1. whits it i; cutrcntly suhsrdr1nig MEPs by $6.1 3Q and Aliscellancous Items by S6X.; I t fhe distribution of potential re‘ CUM' within the Building and Safety I)cpartuicnt is piescnted graphically below I'agc 14 6-b City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS 5700,000 5600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200.000 5100,000 Full Fee Revenue, by Type ssoc ' 4�Ju x1QQ O' \' ooy yo� , ve-, J i �e� ac• �2 eP�\ U�r goo o N 00 c QQ The graph above shows that the clear ntatonty of the Building and Safety Dcpattinent's Ievenuc (and nook activity) is in Nov ('onstnrction t'l I:1' and Miscellaneous revenue: area minor component to the Dcpatttnent's te%enue. Appendix I prelude. a full NCI of fete. hy construction type It might he north noting, hy v. y of example, that the building lees for a typical 4,000.quauc foot Residential home (IBC Type R-;) would he ro $'.%2•1— a lee Ic•vcl consistent with amounts charged in other luusdretious. The follunire too graphs .how rho nuhc ideal process times that the Building and Safety Department applies to plan check and inspection of that 4.000 square foot horse ��l City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Plan Check Times —Custom Residential Home, 4,000 sq. ft 8 00 7.00 6.00 500 Hours 4 00 3.00 700 1 00 000 y,P r Q1 � c a C• c cA rNe .'� JFv cL ` �' P ?¢ P �1,e (.<. `i��l Oya ire` ('^e� e" i e cy c�` e' the graph ahtive .hows that most of the time a.,"ctated with plan checking a irsit{cntial home is ill the .Irnctur:il review ptuec.s I he time as.oci:ti d tt ith inspections :uc .}itwn hi IOw . City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Inspection Times —Custom Residential Home, 4,000 sq. ft 1.40 1 20 t.00 0 80 Hours 0.60 0.20 0.40 e . o� ,0 0°� to Q ' �2 .r+ a �4 ., o j O. the chart ahoy,: depicts the number of bouts consumed by each discipline r't the inspection process for a 4,000 square foot home. CITY CLERK'S OFFICE FUNCTIONS I he City Cleik's Office is re.pon,ible tier a variety of IuncUons, from maintaining official City records. to keeping City Council a ,codas and minutes. to posting official notice. 1!ntil now, the City (tcik has charged one tee audio tape duplication. During the e»rir.c 4,f this .study. the City ('kik added a tee certif.\ ing copies of document, Clearly. a majority ofCah Clerk functions ate not recocerahle through fees CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ISSUES Their were no operational issues smolt ing the City Clerks ( )(tier CITY CLERK'S OFFICE STAFFING RESULTS Altogether, the Co) Clerk's Ottice's h:t; ' I(, Staff who provide 4.s(i of rcork hours. although they hate onh ; '(I hours of time at,i lable atter deductions for 1•.,cc 1- 6 -3 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Icae cacatrons, meetings. etc Of the 4.5(ri hour total. the C'I.rk s (Itftce identified 44 hours in direct tee -related activity. 225 hour: in adnunrstiatice and counter time, 1,115 hours in suppon of other departments, and 1.247 in all other activity. A graph depicting, these hour allocations is presented helots Consumption of Staff Resources !Sleeves, Training. Meetings Admvustrabon & Counter ■ Odter Annual Activity ■Fee -Related Work Support to Other Departments As noted earlier, ccc built up the time and cost of the City 1. lerk's Office baud on the principles of Activity Baud Coster I his process rntalicd establishing tines per activity. based on the major work ettoits lin olved in 'producing" the sen ice The results of the deiliduilion. are depicted graphically helms City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Annual Process Hours 1.800 1.600 1.400 1.200 1.000 800 600 400 200 0 �a QQV J c, •1(� Z. 1 . ?, aC."() c Na o, ycQ Q QF o.Fei p o `OP �\o � \�QQo cJ QQe e5�Joc c ���\ CITY CLERK'S OFFICE REVENUE RESULTS As is to be expected, a majority oldie City Clerk's tunerion..uc .uppoited by the Cltv's (..cncral Fund Only S.1.0s is rcerucrable through user -hosed fee,. nlule $156.777 is chargeable to other depattnlents, and bltlt,;X7 is rekovcied through non -fee fund:. . A giaphic'aI depiction of these ie\enucs is pro% hied in the cliait below Noe 19 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Funding Summary $4.655 ■ Recovered by Fees ■Charged to Departments Charged to Other Funds A detailed fee sdieduIc. showing both current and prolceted fees. is shown in Appendix 2 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS The Community Service. Dep:utnient is responsible for all parks and recrcatiuu activities, among other functions f)uc to the pritine stiuctute of recreational activities, the Community Services Department did not in rtaliv wish to he included in the tee study Since most parks and tecteat toil lees are established based on market rite or negotiated tares (Trot based on cost of operitt,nis). tlic Community Services Department opted for an howls rate schedule instead of a tee schedule That howl rate schedule is provided in Apperido, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS fhe Lngineertng Department is responsible for the emiincerntg review of all development projects that include public improvements d.x.unples include, grading permits. use permits. lot line adjustments. tentative subdivision and tentatit.e paled maps In addition. the Fnitinccring Department provides significant support to the (IIv's Capital Improvement Nutlet is 3nil pn,vidrs genet al engineering support for Traffic and shun' uatet issues Iva¢. _'0 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ISSUES There was One nperational issues in\ulvin_ the Fnf'jneering L)cpanmem that merits noting. as Billows• • Revenues for the L•ngincering Department were unavailable: thus. the fee amounts were projected primarily on time estimates and;tdlu>tcd hour]\ rates ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT STAFFING RESULTS Altogether, the I,nernee.nng I )epai tnient's staff generate 10.91(1 of av atlablc hours, atter deductions lot leaves, vacations. meetings, etc. Of that total. the Department has identified 2,417 in duce] fee -related activity. hours in general, administrative and counter tasks. 921 hours in support to other departments. and 1,750 in non -ter related activities A graph depicting these bout allocations is presented below: Consumption of Staff Resources • Leaves. Trauung. Meetings Administration & Counter ■ Olt ter Ar inual Activity ■Fee-Reiated Work +Support to Other Departments As noted earlier, tie built up the time ;utd cost of the Fnrrnccrinit I )rpannrrnt based on the principles of Activity fused Costing I his process entailed establishing times per activity. based on the major work efforts involved rn -producing- the NCI v icc The results of the distributions air depicted glapliically below 57 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Annual Process Hours 2.000 1.000 500 0 h ti t.b �I`F cz• \Ol•^ -Cs Q C JE bP. f' G: (d' E`.d\ 4, r JG sir Cd , �O SEC JQ uOCYI ) ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT REVENUE RESULTS I1tc City currently provides a significant subsidy foi the I-.nhmcering Department's user •based fees, bused on thrlough analyses of full cost models Specifically, we found a $150,321 annual subsidy ut fee• 'elated services, based on full costs lhe City''s current fee schedule would generate appioxnmatcly $113,580 while the hill Cost recovery modcl would generate approximately $261,001 annually. Approximately $103,918 is chargeable to othct department;, and $133,7$1 is recovered through non-fec funds A graphical depiction ut these tevenucs is provided in the chart below. Nor 1g City of National City Citywide User Fee Update 81 MAXIMUS Funding Summary $433,781 111111111111111111111111 • Recovered by Fees ■ Charged to Departments Charged to Other Funds A detailed fee schedule, showing both current and projected fees. is shown in Appendix 4 FINANCE DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS Most of the Finance Department's duties are not related to fees. Ongoing duties include maintaining the ( -ity s official financtal records, lnocessrng all .recounts payable, payroll. and accounts receisable, managing all cash, monitoring internal controls, etc. The I mantic Department is responsible foi four tee related items, Taxicab Administration, Business License appt,cations, Business License renewals, and Pet 1 iccnsc administration 1lp to now. the City has not charged tor 1'ct 1 iccnse administration, and a new tec was created fur that purpose •111 othei functions performed by the Finance Department are recovered either through the Citv's Cost Allocation Plan or throu!h (icnerat Fund support FINANCE DEPARTMENT ISSUES 1 �ete was one operational issues invoking the Finance Department that nienis noting. a. fullows ■ Current tie le%els for the I•,nancc I)cpaitment s tees were established outside the scope of a tee study lipon performance of this ice studs, it wa. determined that the tec levels would be reduced, therefore. u‘crall re‘ tames fu, the Finance 1)cp; rinient would decline 6-1 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAX IMUS FINANCE DEPARTMENT STAFFING RESULTS Altogether, the Finance Ucparttnent's staff gcncrrlc 27.321 ar.rilahle hours ()f Lila( total, the Department identified 18.I?7 hours in nun toe related murk. 7,543 hours in leaves, vacations, and meetings, I,26( louts ut direct fee -related acttvrly and 3g7 hours in general, administrative and counter tasks A graph dept.rrng these hour allocations is presented beton- Consumption of Staff Resources ■Leaves. !raining. Meetings ■fee -Related Work Adns ustMion & Canter a Other Annual Actmty As noted earlier. we built up the time and cost of the Finance I)epartment based on the pnnciplcs of Activity Leased Costing. Ibis ptucess entailed establishing times per acti%try. based on the major work efforts tm(dyed in "producing" the scr. . ice The results of the di.,trrhutions .are depleted graphically helot P,or ' (eo City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Annual Process Hours 20.000 18,000 16 CO) 14.0011 12.000 10.000 8.000 8.000 4.000 7.000 0 1 �0¢ e`ab PJ e' V FINANCE DEPARTMENT REVENUE RESULTS The Finance Department's current fee levels need to he adjusted dim im,nd to reflect the actual u).i of ptuv idutg services liy adjusting these tees downward. the City's annual rexenues ‘kould decline approximately SI 31.11ii. Orecall, the Finance I)eparrcnent 1rill be funded $693IS through user fees. uhtle it \rill iecenr S90I,! U, IRun the tieneral Fund. as shim ti In the chats bcto‘t. f,_ 2 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Funding Summary ■Reocwered by Fees UCharqed to Other Funds A detailed fee schedule. showing both cwleut and projected fees, is shown in Append;S FIRE PREVENTION FUNCTIONS Fire Prevention conducts plan cheeks and Incpecunm related u, the consime hnn of new occupancies, as well as for fire related systems. hazardous acts\ 'ties and materials, and public facilities Fite Pie \ention's focus is on pihlie safety FIRE PREVENTION ISSUES lhcrc \\crc two operational issues in\ nlcing the Fire I'revention that merit nottnf;, as follows: • Historically. Fire Prevention has provided free plan review and inspection set \ ices tor new construction. The new fee schedules include full costs of upeiatiorl fur IIiCsc sCI \ ICCs and present a re\ nitre opportunity for the (Ity • Fite Pie\cut ion has been iflloca'ed $12.00(1 annually o\Cr tl\C \Car. to support the ( It\ti permit system upgrade Parr ?t, -2- City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS FIRE PREVENTION STAFFING RESULTS As part of our analysis. we aggregated Fire clown statt hunts h> tvpe ul actrcrty. Specifically. +'+ „win cllitlett staff Basle arras" rht folio++in six categories' • State leak cs • Nev Construction Plan Check • New Construction Inspection • !Miscellaneous Items Plan Cheek • Miscellaneous Items Inspection • Support to Other Departments the chart below shows the cqui alent full -tune statt devoted to each of these six activities. Full. Terne Equivalent (FTE) Staff FTE Use by Activity Type 1.8 16 1♦ 1.2 10 08 06 04 0.2 00 �c e� ,r c a P Cc .o 4.s'>• `' a rep o� e e cQ. oci <. .e' `vv c +PC O (e. yi % eVr . .o F O a` \se eF e+ 4e '' �c y c ��. ▪ a▪ e a e Ns '• D `,p<` `0 4 Ns es ,Qs' the Omit ahu+e indicates that Fite Piet enhon t unently allocates appro.+nnately I t) I l l: to Ne (.Ymsiniction Plan Check. 1 1) 1 It In nc++ ( ttrINtrllt'riN.II City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Inspections, (1.2 Fl F. to Miscellaneous Item Plan ('heck, 0.2 I• I I to Miscellaneous Item Impcetrun (including Annual Inspections). and an insignificant amount to support other dcp:ntineuts. Within New Construction. k1c also broke down the staff allocations In residential versus commercial activity (it is impossible to allocate Miscellaneous Item. time to residential versus commercial, since pernnt data are not tabulated in that manner) Of the 2.0 FTE working on Ncw Constiuction protects. 12 Fl F. are allocated to cotrunerci:rl construction, xahile 0 8 I 1 F. are allocated to residential construction. These staff allocations are depicted in the graph below Full-1 irne Equivalent (FTE) Start FTE Use —Commercial vs. Residentia 14 12 1.0 08 0.6 0.4 0.2 00 FIRE PREVENTION REVENUE RESULTS The cost analysis of Fire Prevention fec-related se: ices indicated that it is providing a Is9.'4,4X 1 annual subsidy to the building communrn currently, the City is recuvenng only 9 percent of its cost of prucidnig building related senaees the City's cut]ent annual General fund subsidy is provided fui both New Construction (in the amount of $834,485) and A1rscellaneon; hems tin the lY At City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS amount of S77,7.42) In addition, File Prevention pro,. ides support serf Ices to other departments valued at SI?.83n annually lithe City were to establish tull cost tcciw ry ter rates, it \could gener.nc $924.'83 in annual revenue for fire Prevention. A distribution of this :cc enue is presented graphically below $900.000 S800,000 $ 700.000 $600.000 $500,000 $400,000 S300.000 $200.000 $100,000 SO Full Fee Revenue, by Type o.oc Coct`N s ,? o= cr ry c Q1. The graph above shores that a ntaioiily of lh,: Fire Prevention's rev cnur (and work activity) is in Net, Cunstniction Miscellaneous .\vtit Inv tinrludIn!t Annual Inspections) are also signlliruit. tthtle costs supporting othci depvtinents ,ere relatively minor. Appendix h includes a tull set of fee, for Fire fret ennon PLANNING DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS The Planning Department Is responsible for assisting, the community in planning for its future by ptcpalIng, compiling. and dis rminating'Muttnaunn tin land use. housing, transportation. and other issues that affect the City. faeiln:unir the public process through which plans and polities are adopted: processing development apphcatiuns: making recommendations WI ions .r;tnrc pl:+nnirW, City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS issues and specific deN.rlopment proposals. and conducting en%ironmenial review consistent tcitlr State Lcnc PLANNING DEPARTMENT ISSUES Their ate tluce operational issues involving the Planning I)epaitnicnt that merit noting, as follows• • Uunng the course of this study. most of the staff irons the Community Development Commission were merged with the City's Planning Department. The fees followed the staff to the Planning Department and therefore undertook an entirely new funding stnictuie. The fees incorporated in this study include those fees lion' the Community De% elopinent Commission. • The Planning Department ‘sas allocated S 15,000 annually Ill er five years to pay tor the permitting system upgrade. • Included in the Planning Department costs were S50,000 annually to build up a fund to pay for the (icneral Plan Update (S I million split between Building and Planning over a ten year period) PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFFING RESULTS Altogether, the Planning Department's staff identified 15,580 of ‘roik hours, although they have only 8.827 hours of time available afire deductions for lea( es. cacanons, meetings. etc. Of the 8,827 hour total. the Department identified 1.618 in direct tee -related actin ity. and 4.204 in support and administr.mo,e vests (all of which arc :allocated hack to fees as surcharges). \,Vc built up the time and cost of the Planning I )epartment based on the ininciplcs of Acti%sty Rased ('ostang I his process entailed establishing tithes per activity. hascd on the major Mork etlorts invoked in "producing" the service I he results of the di stnhution.. arc depicted i'nphically below rape 30 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Annual Process Hours 1,600 1.400 1,200 1,000 800 600 400 200 0 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . \'epyJC�i�Q`,f)..; 4:. F4' 40J0 `".Q".' Opc'.,e'C<Acss4 ••e' PO5C�� C' \c\am\a.Aa0SQG').eP.e�e(�e`C2\asoQll'S`aea<eet\.3ti `a,aQtlCV StOaJCl sy •egi43.4ba;' .oa., ;e G\o,` eo��ocaQ 'O 0 G Q�c\\\a�v�o' `aac.r-N.NQQboc,c J�c�a\o`G`,QoGQco\ P o �\�y\cis \Q�c,;1'0• ss Qse• o \`aQuQC, c`oJQQV� QoG0¢c,�V PQCu5)Q PLANNING DEPARTMENT REVENUE RESULTS 1 he ( it) rnrrrnlly ptuo,Jes a,uhstdy tor the Planning I) I iilluctlt's tics, haled un tholough analyses of full cost model, Specifically, we found a$t' 1 .h(,l annual subsidy in Planniue,erviccs (Including support trim )the, departmentst. based on full costs 1 he ('in', current fee schedule \%mild generate approximately $2X0,79.1, \chile the till cost recover model \\+'uId penetatc apptox Irately S602, l' / annually 0\ mall, the ('Ity s Planning, fees are expected to increase approximately 1 1 J percent. should the City adopt full fie recovery The Planning Department also identified approximately D s2c,2 t ; in non -ke ;ICtI CItic', such as long-Ian2e planning. permit tracking, :tnd genet al support to the City Council. all of \\hrch \\uuld requite outside hlndmt', (typically the (ienerat I-imdl Finally. the Planning Department identified approximately I City of National City Citywide User Fee Update E1 r Iflif MAXIMUS $82,966 that would be charred to other departments These revenues arc sho‘en crrphtcall> helots Funding Summary ■Recovered by Fees ■Charged to Depaittnenrs Charged to Othei Funds A detailed fee :,hotting both current and piiiiected tees. is slwtvn m Appendix POLICE DEPARTMENT FUNCTIONS Most of the Police Department's duties ate tclatcd to pro% Rimy puhlic satcttot +II crtvens, and are not related to fees Still, the Police Department has responsibility for a number nt tee related items such as animal licenses, special went permit;. Chore reports, etc. All other functions performed by the Police Department are recovered pi Inarily through General Fund support POLICE DEPARTMENT ISSUES There tt is one operational tssues utvolt in ' the Police Department that n+et its noting. as f'olluns• ■ Revenues for the Police Department's fees were unit :Malik at the time that the tee studv was conducted. Therefore. tee lards are established primanhy un the basis of time estimates and the fulls burdened costs of provtdrng, those services. t'aec t' City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS POLICE DEPARTMENT STAFFING RESULTS Altogether, the Pulicc Department's staff genrtatc 290,665 available bout.. Of that total, the Department identified only 5.209 hours ni fce-related work A majority of the Police Department's time I. understandably rn general public safety duties. rl graph depicting the Department's hour allocations is presented below• Consumption of Staff Resources ■ Leaves. Training, Meetings Administration & Counter ■ Other Annual Activity ■Fee•Retaled Work i Support to Other Departments POLICE DEPARTMENT REVENUE RESULTS l he City currently provides a subsidy for the Police Department's fees, based on thorough analyses of Pill cost models. Spectfically• we found a $20t.'(,i annual subsidy in Police setyices, based on lull costs. l'he City's c'urtent fee schedule would venerate approximately $114.935, while the full cost recovery model would generate apploxnnatefv { t IfI.2(T( annually. Overall. the City's Police fees are expected to increase ,Ipplunimately I'17 percent, should the City adopt full tie recovery. The Police Department also identified approximately S1 1 ..3(11 that would be charged to other dcpattmcnt). I he cleat ntajol it\ of the Police Department's funding would derive from non tee sources. such as the (Ienertl Fund These leycnucs are .huyyu graphically heloyy. City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Funding Summary $17,767,090 ■ Recovered by Fees ■ Charged to Departments Charged to Other Funds A detailed fcc .chetlulr, .howicg both current and projected fcc.• i..Inty, n ni Appendix t; race '4 70 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS USER FEE CONCEPTS AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES GENERAL FEE PRINCIPLES Local governments are funded from a yanety of sources, ptiuraiil\ taxes, subventions, tees, special ch;rrgcs. fines, grants, and rtssessments :\s the traditional provider of basic situ ices. cities and counties are constantly struggling with securing sufficient funding to pay tor the services expected demanded, and ur desired by the citi7c nry. Many local Eo cmment services are universally accessible and beneficial, such as poli(e and tire protection. library recreation. open space, etc Other governmental goods or services benefit a particular segment of the population, must often providing a dnect monetary or personal benefit to the ieeipicnt. It is for this latter group that subsidy and recovery lei els are often considered more carefully. Given the nature of goveinnrcnt financing. if the costs of piovidutg specialized goods and services ale not fully recovered. there roust he a decrease in funding lot other public goods and set vices Goods and set% ices that typically have associated user Ices are those that usually provide specific financial or personal benefits to selected indtyidual(sl. fhc assumption underlying most fee recommendations is that the costs of set%ices benefiting indiv idtials, and not society as a whole, should he borne by the individual receiving the benefit Setting uscr fees. therefore. is equivalent to establishing prices for sere ices. (Governmental agencies are nut allowed to make a profit in the provision of sery ices.) For most fees. govenunents typically set the fee level to recover the cost ofpruvidinr each service. It is generally accepted that a tee's cot recovery level should be ni ducct proportion to the individual tit specific benefit received by the uidiv idualls) I-oi example, if a developer wants to rezone farm land fur a housinr development, the City may not want to charge that business a fro Icy than hill cost. since to do otherwise would require a subsidy paid by the genet al citircnry iwho do not share in the particular benefit). Where new development causes an increase in intrasttueturc requirements, that increase should logically he shared pro rata with the existing area, proportionate to the degree that the new development benefits from the mtiasriuctuie Conversely. a recreation piutraiii could logically he suhsidired from the general tax base in oiler to piornote the overall \yell-beim.. of the general public. or to achieve specific socio economic objectives IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Ftum :a political perspective. there is a natural reluctance to raising tees Communities Btu\. accustomed to existing lee levels. and eeneially have ;r natural desire to maintain the status quo Yet, if fee levels fail to recover hill (roses of operation. then other act iv it cs must he scaled down to support the 1'a„t ; - City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS unrecu%crcd costs of tee -related activities Politically. there arc winners and losers associated ally change in lees Viewed from the vantage point of the average cunstitucncy %Sawing a wide range of governmental services, ,cuing fees at or close to full cost recovery (recreation excepted) can be acceptable vvhen the follow tog can be demonstrated ■ Persons or groups not shay log in a specific benefit should or will out shaft: in that cost via a subsidy. • The fee is for a iequired service that benefits only the applicant. and • The applicant's desired sett ice level is aehicced, e p.. higher fee levels could support more responsive or inrrc,,scd service levels. A basic premise hchind fee subsidization is rclahvely straightforyarl cr' ne one must poi When governments subsidize activities instead oftecovcnng full costs of operation, there is less inoney for the jurisdiction to accomplish other goals. Typically, the public's desire, and demands foi services outstnp the government's .tbility to raise sufficient funding to provide Iho.c sec ices. While governments typically choose to subsidize cchant activities for the greater public good. e.g. recreation activities for youth. seniors. and the disadvantaged. if they also subsidize activities like planning appeals (which benefit only the ap}+!leant), then they will have fewer dollars for general activities. The following man ix graphically portrays the various types of governmental services and the logical payers of those services User Fee Payer Matrix (Who Benefits) e.,xm,undy Pr,nlatly me Community with less Individual Benefit Pnrnanly the Inamdual wdti less Community Benefit Incloadual Benefit Only (Service Type) PubI c (e q . Police Paid) PubG✓Pnvate (e q. Fite Supp.ess,on) P, IvatelPuhhr. (e.g. Community Seances) Pim:dc (e q.. Land Use. BuM,nq Pe,mm4 (axes vs. Fees, Inl% Tlxcs Pnmanry Taxes. Some Fees Pnmanry Fees. Some Taxes 100% rees \s shown above, police patrol %could logically he funded Iry Iaxcs. %%bile a pri%le levelupinent subdi%ision %vuuld be funded by user tees 7Z City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Our expel tenet: is that most applicants for planning and huilding services arc rinlrC concerned with the quality and timeliness of services than they ;ITC to contemplated mcicases in fees --time is money to the applicant While not embraced Joyfully. tees raised to recover full costs are invat!ably accepted as a part of doing business. as long as the value to the applicant is provided. FACTORS LIMITING FULL COST RECOVERY It is irnpossihle to have a tee schedule that perfectly collects exactly and precisely the full cost of providing services at any point in time Both costs and the demand for services change continuously. However, in the aggregate, ok er the period of a veal, it is possible to establish fee levels designed to recover all eligible costs. In recognition of that Invitation, California Government Code `6fr014 requires that fees be established at levels that recoyct "the estimated teasonahlc cost of providing the services or materials MAXIMUS has designed its models and fee study methodologies to meet this ciiterion EkCH so. conditions change on a daily basis Oker time. those conditions may change sufficiently to require updates to fee schedules -m essence to ecalibrate fees to the standard established by C'aliforni.i (iovcrnntent Code *6601 4 (here arc six primacy factors that may cause a dntt m fee lee els, and which typically result in the undercharging 01 tees. All of these factors WCTC evidenced in these studies tot the City of National City. Just as they ate usually disco%cred in uthet jurisdictions All six factors were identified. adjusted. corrected. or otherv\ise addressed in the teconuuended rate strictures fhe six factors ac • Inaccurate labut rates • Reliance on time materials (hourly) tees ■ Incomplete estimates of labor utilization • Incomplete fee schedules ■ Historical choices to subsidize user fees • Instil tic lent updates Each of ihcsc six factor.; is addressed ru detail bchcoo 1) Inaccurate Labor Rates One of the pnnuan factors Iirniliii the hill TCCOk ery Of costs IS that labor rate, do not capture 100 percent of costs the following list includes lusts that generally are not fully accounted tot ni tate calculations • ,Annual acetu.d of sick leave • Annual holiday lane • lime associated %kith ncusotrnirni lc.t' City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS • I true associated with routine management & staff meetings • Expenses associated with Citywide overhead (presently fin draft fora nt • L•xpenscs associated with do. is anal and. or departmental overhead • Expenses associated with administrative staff support 2) Reliance on Time & Materials (Hourly) Fees Thcory would suggest that the most equitable way to charge a client for a service would he to track the total time and charge an hourly rate based on the personnel cost of the person(s) providing the service. The reality is that this system is flawed. Several factors make this system inappropriate • Without a precise time tracking and automated tool that monitors I11(t perecnt of staff time. times assigned to projects are nearly always underestimated. • lluutly rues arc habitually too low and fall to capture: the following • ( )vcncead expenses, vacation, sick leave, holiday, and Other "non- productne" time, and • lime spent on support activities such as counter duty. database maintenance. geuetal adnuntstration, training and meetings • Divisions are typically not asked to sct mcasutable objective; on billable hours that one might see In the private ccetor yt ill) similar pn>frssiunal discipline: Whole not all of the factors have been uhseryed in the City, tit general, they all cone Mute to the undo recovery of costs. where applicable 3) Incomplete Estimates of Labor Utilization I here are two primal Ieasons why estimates of labor utilization for any rIyen sery Ice arc Inaccurate Those two reasons are. • They frail to Identify the work processes. activities. and task. ;associated wish the service Therefore, estimates of time are typically underestimated by a significant margin. to address this problem, MAX!Nil IS takes an exit step to first identify and define the work processes that actually ptoduce City setvnces. • They frail to t.aptme tn>ss.dep.ntmcnlal support or ('ityyvtde labor utilization 1 hese efforts vvcre :In important factor in reyrcy%ing City sei vices. and every effort was made to Identify and capture these additional costs 4) Incomplete Fee Schedules ( tutdated or incomplete fee schedules are often a minim season w he a City doe: not fully recover its costs MAXIM' IS spends additional time yyith each department to identify those sctyices that should be added to the tee schedule l'aR }$ 71 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS those that should he deleted, and those that should be split into sub categories to reflect mote accurately the (. ity's services. 5) Historical Choices to Subsidize User Fees Many jurisdictions establish unecri(tcn policies or encourage a piactice ot subsidizing uses tees. Often, the objective is keep user fees low to encuut•ILe economic development. While their is little evidence that the Iecel of user fees, on the whole, has any impact on economic deselupmcnt, the result ot these policies or practices is often the inability of staff to keep up iyith workloads As economic development occurs. the ability of the City to finance these scrciccs is secetcly constrained 6) Insufficient Updates A common finding in out studies is the lack ot a tormal usci tee update process [he traditional method of adding, an inllatiouaty incieasr, typically by the Consumer Price Index it'f 1), otter fails after a vcar or two Increases based on inflation tail to captuie cost increases resulting flout changing regulatory 'count:m lts and the associated changes in work processes LEGAL FRAMEWORK IN CALIFORNIA There arc a variety of laws, regulations, and opinions that shape the design of user tee studies in Califonua. A summary of those legal considerations follows Proposition 218 On November 5, 1996, Ow California voters added aiticIe. XIII (•:aid I) to the Califuinia (onstinttinn Among its many piuvistuns. t'roposnron 218 poi ided That governmental chaiges fui service could not exceed the cost of providing that scr\lic Kith the utcis' consent Selected requuemcnts include the following Section6.2(b)l. Res trines dervedfrom the fee ur chary,. Altai) not exceed the "'was required to pro ride the property related 5er ric c. Section 62(IO2 Reyennec derived lrom the fee ar ( harp(' chnll nor he t.ee•d for u,,,t' purpose• other than that for ct inch the !cc' ur Choi Kt- ti tic I tit po s (. d. California Government Code §66014(a) Califoniia CO cmmcnl Code Section 66014(.i) specifics th:d the charges for planning and building fees he based on estimated. reasonable cosh of pro\ idrog those services The Applicable language is. Section (160I41a) ie-hen a /oral agent r charycs /cc.5 for _ontng rurutnr..'-o,nrry c hnn•c•.). rice /n•rmi!>, hnrlrhnit urcprr'rrnn.ti: huffdin�� NI/ nib /thee!; and/ern„ tern); a/rplt,'utiorr.c and f't!tIt me filed with the City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS local agent.) formation romune)siun or (inducting preliminary woe eedinr,'s Or prat ee(/inggs those le('S gull not i'r('ee(/ the estimated reasonable Gust of prat 'ding Ihe 3er17re fot' Itho it the fed' is charged.. . California Attorney General Opinion 92-506 On March 9, 1993 California Attorney Gcncral i)aniel E. Lunpre'ti issued all opinion that c..cnnally invalidated the use of valuation for determining building fees Among the Attorney General's Opinion was the folio)) my conclusion Conclusion 3: /fa /urn/ a, en,'v charges building permit and sini/(o' fees haled upon the ( uniform Building Cade 1'aluatiun lahl's without supporting evidence regarding the iclotiu chip between the fees and the services rendered cur h lees are invalid to the extern they ere('ed the reasonable rust) of prat :ding the service's rendered California Legislative Counsel Opinion #12478 Ctn Juh 21. 1997 California Legislative Counsel Rion M Gregory also expressed conct'ius about the valuation method. as folios)' C ortcquenlli,'• it us (MI Opinion Ihat tlr(' silt bitildal}' department may nr't us(- theft(' s( hedules found in the valuation tahlrs set Jot th lit the California Building ('ode to establish fees associated with admiinistrri n' or processing permits. cernficates. or other forms or dot 'orients required or authort'ed i'y tine Slate' Housing law. or with the east) of odor( emote of the .'late /lousing l mt' but is required to limit ih(:si fees to the estimated costs of providing thr services rcndere J In this same opinion, Legislative Counsel opined that ties may include costs 411 code cnfurcemcnt, zoning enforcement, employee training, and other icuctal costs tcgttircd of a building department, as folios) /lu.s. ,se are of the ()putout that .Set tion /'0i1/ofthr (.'ail,/e'r,u r health and .Safety Cade/ author:7es the city to include within the fre,. it rhar,es for building permits and inspections, the costs ussonatril a tilt plan cheeks• inspee tiaras. building e ode tmforie'neru.:oiling enforcement. document )ilinr fees, counter anti telephone asSIs(anre off), e malrtte'nimk e. and employer ftatminr' Paladin Fair Housing Coalition, The Building Industry Legal Defense Foundation, and Barratt American, Inc. v. City of Murrieta (Superior Court Nos. 282449 and 299778) In May, 1999 the City of ishrmetta settled a Riscrside County Superior (•outs erase that alleged the ('ay was chatginp excess building tees the City admitted that its inethud of calculating fees was "unreliable, inaceuratc, and improper The lily agreed to implement the iistlussin+'• City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS I) Reduce its building tees (as much as S I . ;00 pet esudenrual home) 2) Refund recent construction ovetchargcs. 3) Eliminate valuation -based fees determined lions the International Conference of building Officials (ICIiU) tables .1) Adopt a new fee schedule based on time and motion tables from the Paladin Ciroup 5) Allow the Paladin (Troup authority to monitor and enforce the ant cement. Dick McCarthy. of the Paladin Group, said of the settlement •/he hiimehuter refund to unpret edented in (•nlifornia. And this victory it !us! the lust in our on going battle to reduce tar/anly high hut/du,,c' fees tlnuieghout ('nlJfrn:u This nil! help reduce hurtle prices And the het purl al this agreement is thus the mutt has Risen u the authnrlir (o Make sure lutcer feet arc en/)reed Barratt American, Inc. v. City of San Diego (Superior Court Nos. 743672 and 760826) In sit it court, the City of San Diego agreed to cease the use of valuation as a method of establishing building permit fees, and to use 3 third puny to establish new tee levels Applicable language is as ((dims:, The Car agrees to select rt third party to t alrhu t u /ee s turd; it hit h at a min n:tint, examine ichether the c urrc,it building permit and plan check fees are hosed upon the estiniated reatnnrlhle COAL\ i,tcu, led by the City In perfrtrrning plan cheek any! building ,rtry,er-tine sort a e. The lee .study will also discuss ithcther alternative li'e .Arliedudr(t) not hosed upon valuation tables mini' nrcurutell !elle(t the City arluul rtpt rtsot to perjurm plan check and Inspection cerru eA , Ilso. the ter stw/y VI ill analyze the amount of tune spent hr (itv hu,Lhnw inspect),; on a Stlniplt ;g of sitikle lamely residential unto 0, e rt time Mid n1,111,11 ,1i1(II ) Barratt American, Inc. v. County of Orange (Currently on Appeal) In this case, Bairatt alleged that Dianne County colIcetcd e cessise huddinfr permit and plan ueeiety fees, and accumulated a multi -million drillat surplus •\ trial cowl ruling required that the County' reduce its future building permit and plan review fee, ht $4 5 million Barratt American v. City of Rancho Cucamonga Rattan alleged that the City ryas collecting huildiug permit fees in c\cess of the costs of pros iding sea ices At the conclusion of the trial. James Markman. City Attorney tor the city of Rancho Cucamonga stated Rarrult •3 ulleRntlnns again.si Ranch\, ( slit (inumEa arc 'Vitt ,ono! hrratcse the cam non hrt0' Ili&' re< t tin Oh' i tit!( of %a rri(c. -1 I City of National City Citywide User Fee Update �;►r'r MAXIMUS It should be noted that the ( of Rancho Cucamonga used the NL.XI .S model to estahlich its new building tees Richmond v. Shasta Community Services District On I.ebntary 9• 7°04, III,: California Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision which established that water connection charges and rapacity tees are not assessments or properts-related fees that mould be subject to Proposition 218. Bighorn -Desert View Water Agency v. Verjil On July 2'1, 2006. the ('alililtuia Supreme Court niled municipally -set rates for metered hater consumption, sewer service, and solid waste collection are subject to the pros isions of Proposition 218. rhos, governments must abide by noticing and voting requirement.' tor rate rnereascs Further. fees charged to municipally operated utilities by then host governmental agency. e r city or count-, must establish that those charges arc h;ised on actual cost. ICBO Admits no Nexus between Tables and Fees In 199I, representatives from the International Conference of Building (ittic,als (ICBM, which is now the International Code Council (ICC), pteseutcd testimony to the Riverside County, California (nand Jury that its fee tables arc not related to the cost of providing services -Durtnp.lpril am/,that of /QQ1. the (i,a,rd,lury•rn /!n•r'rcrr/v (-punt). CaliJonrra• rondurfella htarrng tin birildilij 1411 rt rind cieid(pnrera free tRiv,ersidc Gram dduo. Cove .Vo V4 i). The (irund.lurc heard tro'nnlnn from rr/)rc.tie n)ruil•e•.s of the 1CB() that their' r; na rnlprrvral (lute that re'/ayes the fees contained in the l%BC IL/inform Building C''lde/ permit fee table: to the cost uj per mil / (Toted serf i(rc rendered fn. lord( ju, tsar( Irons Fstahli.hitig Building Permit Fees, 2nd f:dition, 200i, Michael W. Buuse, page t i 2001 Marin County, California Grand Jury A March 20. 2001 Marin County, California Grand Jun' report titled /'rofrrrnp from Building l'crmit lees made the following rive recoinrncndahons to all jurisdictions within the County in response to excess building fee collcctiou 11 Start keeping accurate time and expenditure ecoids. 2) De%elop accurate indirect cost rates j Ohtain a 2; i vote for any excess fee collections 4) For those junsdiction' using 11B(: valuation. adjust the percentage recovery until revenues match costs overall S) I <tahlish a bust account (Ui enterprise hind' to hold fund' over from one veat to the next Pair 42 7g City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS California Government Code §66016 ('ahlurnia Govt.-lumen! (.'ode Section (.6016 requires that excess building and plannin ' tee collections in pour periods are used to reduce lees in the Ilium: The applicable language is - Section 66016 ..lf hotcitre the fees ur servter, rha,ge.s + r late reiernrce% can excess uJ actual Lost. those r.'te,,ue; shall be u%rd to redact the fee a+'service ( hor,fe renting the excess California Government Code §66016-66018 California Govei,tnnent ('uric Sections 66016-660I R outline the pnocedures requited to enact new planning and building fees Some hijhlit'hled language follows. Section 660) 6(a).... Prior to leering n nt'tt• fee or srrt'u r' r hat ge. ,n /n tut to approving an increase in tut c.ctt(tn.g fir' or sir tire chug yc. u lu( al a;rnt.1' %ho/l halt' at It'Crtt ale Open and puhli( mc•ctnr; of -Alin h ar o! ur Itr a(ea preservations ran bi made. tt.' port r)/'a regular A schr(luleil ine tiiig ,Votive of the time and place of the ',wiling. including a l;<nrrro! e ' i1unatiun of the matter to be c,msrdcnY/. and a ttan•merit that the data required lit• this section is available. shall be,oils d at least 1 J daps prior to the meeting to art interested purl'' a hu ides a tt rith'n t iquisr tt ith the local agency for mailed aim( a of the' mcitvrtti; wt tie, ' or anrreacea lees ar sir t ii ' c hart'c% Section 660 16(b)..4m. a( iron /ry (1 local agent t to lr't•t o nt tt /.',' ?it srrt tic charge or 10 approve an irru'eate »r cur ,'cis(tn,' lie ur tt i't rct' charge %hall he taitert onll ht' ordinance tit ;esalation 1hi L,+;r%lotnr built alit 10r111 n rn( t' shall not ch•!c>>alr the author at to adopt a nett lr or service , halge. or la Inn raw et Ire or sett -if e chat .t4( Section 66016(i )• Aar lusts incurred In a local ngrnct in (urduc(im' the nu'r1Nng or n+ietiflL.', nnu)' he recovere(l Irony /cis churgrd Jar rho se, rt t'.1 tt hir'h were the subject o/ the not dote Section 66U1 7(a). Ant* action adopting a Ice or churl;(• en' nn, minnow, a Ice or sharp' adopted, upon a del-chi/inn rit'noire, which applies to the Jnhng ot't spline, rrrirtt'ing, appr(crrg, or tsstrtrry of all applrr orvun. pe inn( or entitlement to ase...shull he (Jlrcut,' no wooer than 60 (lays Jollou a tl,c final a( NMI Mt the oduptwt: of the lit- or rltorgt• or in( irate of the Ire o1 rhur>;i. Section 661) I R(a) Prior to adopting an ordtnurtc c. resohrtron, or tither lr'on'lanrr rnactrnenr adopting a new 1i,e nr apprut erg on tier 'east: to tut rrisnn, Jrr . (t /used Ogee? t shall hold n public he anti'. of which oral ur It r'inrr prr'cr'nt,Nons can be /nude, at prim a/ a regular /t s( health d rrtt'ctiag Pa: e t; 79 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS Section (4h(118(h):.Ifly eYrsts incurred by a /OCu1 01!en, of e,JJidne link the hearing te•quirrd ptrrvitant 1n subdivision (a) nlat• he reeotere•dnc part of the feewliuhwere the sablectofthe heat ing California Government Code §6253(b) California Government Code Section 625 i(b) provides that public agencies may not imposes charges fur photocopying setvict-s in excess of the cost of Copying the documents 1 he applicable language is• Section 6251(h). each state...ageney. upon 0 1 rqut. ( for 0 Copt ,(t orde that reasonably drsrrihes an identifiable record 01 record)..shall remake the record. promptly available to any person uporl palm( n1 of feces e over7n}; direct costs of duplirritfon. 0? a statutory fee if. applicable. North County Parents Organization for Children with Special Needs v. Department of Education In the fourth I)rshict, California Court of Appeal. the court ruled in 1994 that public agencies may not charge excessive fees for photocopyint'. service':. and struck down a 5 cent pet page fee, thereby requiting a rate below 25 cents per pave. typically interpreted as no more than 10 cents per page. The applicable court ailing is as inflows: the "direct costs of duplication.' arc• "...the r ost u/ 1u nholy the ropviltg machine. and conceivably also the erpen.se of the person nprrating it. r(r ost' does not include the ancillary tusks lreressol ah U.ssacln(rd with the retrieval, utspectio7r uucl htinfiling of fhe lilt' from whirl the ropy is etit tiered .• California Civil Code §1719(a)1 The California C'nd Code Section 1719(a)1 sets by stature the tees that may he charged for returned checks I he cuitent fee amount is $25. The :applicable language: is as follows 1'or WOO I(Judi ttg any pentl sanctions that may apph . 0111' person who pairs a rherk on insuff(iev71 funds shall be Kahle to the pal ce for the Ornount al the cheek and a set t•we charge pat able to the payer lot an amount mit to eat ee(/twenty-Jit'e Jolla's (525) for the to st Cheek 1Wstrd on insufficient fnl7,ls and an amount t7,71 to et, red 7177r,t•-flee' ,br/nes (535)far rue 17 subsequent check to Oita puree pnccrd ,.n ui;uJiiclent funds F'aSi 44 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update �ll l.i MAXIMUS FUTURE UPDATES MULTI -YEAR FEES t 1.�XIMUS develops its fee analyses on the most accurate, up -to (late budget data.( available, in this case. the adopted F1' 2007 08 budget ( tncr fee adjustments are implemented. we reconuncnd updating the fee calculations annually to account for changes in costs over time. Cities can safely increment their fee schedules vvnh a cost inflator oil an annual basis, hut every 3-5 years. they should conduct complete fee studies (depending on the volatility of the (ity's (lurk practices and operating environment). The development and use of an automatic lee increase mechanism normally provides a desirable level tit convenience and cfficieliL , because stale do not have to recalculate cost recovery percentages each year ttovveyei, the use of a sub -optimal approach can result in cost increases significantly outpacing resulting sec revenue recovcries. To ensure than jurisdictions adopt appropriate fee levels that reflect actual changes in upetating costs. cities should consider ;vie two alternative methods. Alternative 1) Update the Fee Model Annually llte most accurate method to ensure accurate fee increases is to recalculate tees based on new staffing and expenditure tigutes each year llowek et. ibis approach could likely he the most time consuming (srd expensive) of the atternatikes. as it tequucs srgniticant frnaucial analysis and a repeat of the apptuval process hor that reason. NIA XI1v1US recommends that full user lee studies hr conducted ev-er% 3 5 years, unless Oleic are substantial changes to the rnganiz.ation and:ur the pro( iston of public goods and scrk ices Alternative 2) City Labor Costs (Recommended Alternative) Labor costs comprise the bulk of expenses for most government set -Vices. particularly planning and building. Consequently. char -hies in (abut costs dine the overall change in !petating costs 1 o Rico%er costs more accurately, jnn.dietiuns can insert into the rate schedule .t fee adjustment factor than is based on kno\k.n and anticipated labor cost changes. such as piugtammed cost of II\int'. raises. association agreements. alaisalaty step increases, benefits adjustments. and other .ajar or benefit modifiers Labor costs are generally easier to predict than most other costs. since most agencies have greater control over their internal cost.but theimore. common ( onsutner Price Index 1( t'I I tactors are not specific to the regional economies of many communities As a result, NIAXI\II I\ believes that annual ,idjnstmcnts Pap: d, City of National City Citywide User Fee Update based on specific labor costs timild he the most reasonable method of adjusting fees annually. ikcighing both the costs and benefits of alternative methods RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CITY OF NATIONAL CITY As part of the City Council's adoption of its new tic schedule. MAXIMUS recommends that the City incorporate an annual adlustmeut factor. preferably tied to lahor rate increases, as approved by the City Manager's Office. Further, MAXI.IUS tcconuncnds that the city conduct user fee studies of those depanmcnts not incorporated into the fee studies presented herein. Finally, M-\XIMUS recommends that the City conduct a new user tee study ‘iithin a i-S year time period to rccalihratc fees to then cuneut conditions Pape t( t� 2 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS MAXIMUS •O/,VC UN/*SMWT ONW IN, gnrv- CORPORATE BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE tv1AXIMIIS is a New York Stuck Exchange firm with over 1;500 million in revenues in 2006 and over 5.000 employees MA.XIMI,S, Inc and David M Griffith and Associates, Ltd. (DMG) were both founded in 19 /6 and, in May 199X. DMCU merged with 1\1AXIMI to furor the nation's largest consulting firm specializing in local and state government financial. operations rmpmvcrnrnr, systems, and health care applications. The Financial Services Division comprises I i0 professionals serving over f,000 governments, universirics, arni other public sector and not -for -profit organizations each year. the division has operated continuously since 1976. The 1 inanciat Services Division comlmises three regions (Central/Last, South, and West), each led by a Regional Area Director and reporting it, the President of the Division 1 he Western Region is headquartered in Sacramento. ('alifnrma, \kith additional offices in brie, Denver, and Seattle The Western Regik•n specializes in user fee analysts, cost allocation plans, S13 90 state mandated eoa recovery, and operations improvement there is no firm %vr)h grcaltr experience m cost analysis and revenue enhancement than MAXIMt in California ui in any other state In California. we have provided fiscal studies to over 200 cities, counties, and specrat kltsurcts. Since our first fee study in 1983, we have pertonncd over 100 user fee studies 6.r more than 70 clients. We seek to identity not only the full cost uteach current user fee service. hut also all potential tee sea ices that the client mig•.ht not currently be recovering. kVe bring innovation to oui studies, an example of \vhich is the creation of our NEXI building and safety system Finally. and pciliaps most i nporlantly. a hallmark of our approach is that our studies arc implemented vvith minimum client tiusual ion our goal is to make each stud\ hulk educational and inlay -:rile by the client. MAXIMI 'ti consultants have been called upon to examine virtually ekery facet of local government operations Major pithily: sector services ottcred by the firm include • Cost of Service analysis facer\ ity -based costing, fee fur service. user feel • Revenue enhancement (impact ter analysis. 101 audits, revenue maximization) IN Cosi allocation and indirect overhead rates • ( Iperahnns nnpiov einent and pet torinancc measurement • State Controller's Report preparation (Cal turnia) • Slate mandated cost recovery (Calitorn i:r S 90) City of National City Citywide User Fee Update V 111 t MAXIMUS APPENDIX 1: BUILDING FEE SCHEDULES NEW CONSTRUCTION FEE SCHEDULE NEW CONSTRUCTION REVENUES MEP FEE SCHEDULE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED IBC Project Sizr Class • IBC Occupancy Type Threshold A-1 Assembly -Fixed Seating 1 000 Theater Concert I tall 5 OW 10.000 20.000 50 000 100 000 A2 Assembly -Food Dnnk - 1000 • Restaurant Mont Ckrb. 8ar 5.000 10 000 20.000 50 000 100.000 A3 Assembly- .Worship Amusement 1.000 Arcade Church Community Han 5.000 10 000 20.000 50 000 100.000 A-4 Assembly -Indoor Sport Viewing - Arena, 5kahng Rink, Tennis Court A Occupancy Tenant Improvements 1 000 5 000 10.000 20 000 50 000 100 000 400 2000 4000 8.000 20.000 40 000 B Business -Bank _ 100 500 1 000 2.000 - _- - 5000 _ - ---- 10.000 R 8u9ness-Clrn_K. Outpatient 100 -- -- 500 -. ._ 1.000 7000 5000 10.000 I1 _ Busness-Diy_Cleanutn _-- _ 500 7500 5000 10.000 25 000 50,000 B Buslnec-Protes:.or it Otte.' 1 000 . ------- - 5000 -- --- • 70.000 20.000 50.000 _. --- -- t00000 8 Bus ness-1 hgh Rise Office 5 UU0 25 U00 50.000 100.000 250.000 500 000 14 _ P Occupancy Tenant Improvements 250 1 250 2.500 5 073 12 500 25.000 Construction Type IA, 18 Construction Type IIA,11B, MA, ■B, IV Construction Type VA, VB Base Cost Cost for Base Coat Cost for Base Cost Cost tor Each (.d Each @ Each Threshold Additional Threshold Addliwwf Threshold Addional She 100 st' Size 100 sf • Size 100 sr $3 126 579.5175 52.605 366 2616 12.084 $53 011 / $6 307 $73 0600 55.256 560 8833 $4.205 548 7067 $9 900 551 8200 58.300 543.1833 3.6.640 334.5467 515.142 5375267 3.12618 5312722 $10.095 $25.0178 526.400 3.44,4600 3.22.000 537 0500 3.17600 520.6400 3.48.830 148.6300 $40.525 $40 525U 137 470 3.37 4200 $4.296 $107 3190 53.580 $89.4325 $2.864 571.5460 _ $8.589 $98 3640 57,758 $81 9700 55.726 365.5760 513,507 3.70.1700 $11,256 3.584800 59005 346.7840 520.525 $50.2210 .517.104 541 8533 513.883 $33 4827 535.592 560 0720 529 660 550.0600 523.728 340 0480 $65,628 $65 6280 $54,890 554.6900 $43,752 $43.7520 $3.928 $103 5840 $3.273 588 3200 52.619 $69.0560 58.071 595.5920 $6.726 5/96600 3.5,381 $63 7280 3.17 851 567 0440 $10.709 $55.8700 3.8.507 544 6960 $19.555 3496560 $16.296 $41 3800 $13.037 3.331040 534 452 557.8400 _$28 /10 $48 7000 $22968 3.38. 5600 563.372 $63 3720 $52.810 $52 8100 542.248 542 2480 $4,024 5108.0180 $3.353 590.0150 52.683 $72 0120 58 345 $99 9380 $6,954 $83 2800 55.563 $66 6240 513.342 $69 6960 $11.118 $58 0800 $8,894 546.4640 $20.311 5521960 516.926 543 4967 $13 541 $34 7973 $35,970 $80 2520 $29.975 S50.2100 _ 523.980 $40.1680' $68,096 $66 0960 $55 080 $55 0800 $44.064 3.44.0640 11.572 186.2560 51,310 $71 8800 51.048 357 5040 $2.952 $77 5920 $2,460 364.6600 51.968 551 7280 54.504 $57 8880 $3.754 3.48. 2400 $3.003 338.5920 3.6.820 $37 7480 $5 683 $31 4567 34.547 $25.1653 511.350 548.6120 59.458 540 5100 3/.566 532 4080 321.072 3.52.6800 517.560 343.9000 $14.048 535.1200 33400 51.120 8300 $2 833 5934.0250 12.267 3.747.2200 17.883 11.060 5960 $6,569 $883 8300 55,256 $707.0640 $13.186 5699.1440 $10 989 i582 6200 $8, 791 $466 0960 520.178 5583.9480 $16,815 3486.6233 $13,452 3.3892987 $37.696 5619.8600 131 414 5516 5500 525,131 $413 2400 $68 689 5688 8920 357.241 $572 4100 545.793 $457.9280 13.208 $1,031 0650 52.6/3 $859 8875 $2.138 $687 9100 57.335 5974.0400 3.6.113 5811.7000 $4.890 $649 3600 $12 205 $646.0440 $10.171 5538. 3700 _ 3.8,137 3430.6960 518.666 $533 3880 515,555 $444.4733 512.444 $355.5787 $34.667 $571 7000 $28.889 $476 0000 123.111 5380.8000 _ $63.227 5632.2680 152,089 3.526.8900 $42,151 7421 5120 53.308 5130.9125 52.750 $109.0938 $2.205 $87 2/50 $5 926 $115.7700 54.938 5964750 33,951 577.1800 58.820 $89 6800 $/.350 $74 9000 55.880 $59.9200 $13.314 553 /400 511.095 544 /833 $8.876 $35 8267 521.375 574.2500 517.813 $61 8/50 $14.750 $49 5000 $39.938 $79 8750 $33.281 $66.5625 526.625 153 2500 35.102 $125.6400 $4251 $104.7000 57401 1837600 $10 127 $114 9450 58.439 3.95.7875 $6.752 576.6300 $15875 $87 3650 513229 56863/5 $10.583 554 9100 $24.111 $58.4050 520.093 5486/1/13 316.0/4 $38936/ 341.633 $70.3650 534 694 $58 6375 3.27. 7 55 $46 9100 3.76.815 376.8150 $64.013 564 0125 351.210 551.2100 $18 339 3.34.8200 $15.282 $29.0187 $12.226 _ _ 523.2133 525.303 5/13100 $210HS 5594250 3.16868 3.475400 343.130 $52 2800 535 942 $43 566/ $28,/53 $34 8533 369.270 534.4033 557.725 $28.6694 146.180 5229356 $170 875 545 9300 $100.729 $38 2750 $80.583 S30.6200 3735 /00 347 1400 1196.41/ 139 2833 $157,133 $31 478/ 11237 S100 3110 $1.031 $83 5975 S825 566 8740 $2.240 $89 0760 3.1.867 $74 2300 3.1 494 559.3840 13 354 $68.4840 3.2.795 557.0700 52.236 145 6560 35.066 S41 8360 54.222 $34.8633 13.377 527 8907 $8 204 $56 7960 3.6 836 $47 3300 $5 469 537 8640 S15 303 561 2120 $12 753 $51 0100 510.202 _ $40 808U MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 1 of 1 6/26/08 - 9 38 AM City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED Construction Type IA, 1B Construction Type BA, IIB, IIIA, BIB, IV Construction Type VA, VB Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Each @ Each IBC Project Slze Threshold Additional Threshold Additional Threshold AtidMOiiat Class IBC Occupancy Type Threshold Size 100 sf • Sire 100 sl • Size 'fhb sf'.. •. F Fduptional-Growp Occupancy _ 500 12 787 5140 565C $2 323 $117 1375 01.858 $93 7100 6• persons up to The 12111 Grade 2.500 $5.599 f 1'29 0000 S4 666 $107 5000 13.733 386 0000 5,000 58.824 591 7550 S7 353 5.76 4625 15.883 $61 1700 10.000 513 412 066.0650 S 11 176 $55 0547 5.8 941 $44 0433 75 000 _ $23.321 578. 6450 $19 434 $65 53/5 f 15.548 5524300 50.000 142.98.3 $85 9650 5.35 819 $71.6375 $28 655 5.57 3f00 E Ed. catronal • -Day Care 300 $2427 $178 6950 $2 072 $148 9125 $1.618 $119.1300 - 5. children. older than 2 112 yrs 1 500 $4.57 i 5160 8900 13.8U9 $134 0/50 13.047 $107.2600 3.000 $6 984 $119.7450 $5 820 099 78/5 14,656 f 70.8300 6.000 S10 577 f 78 5050 $8.814 $65.4208 _ $7.051 552 3387 - _ - 15.000 5.17642 51006650 $14 702 $83.8875 _ 511.762 5.6/ 1100 • _ - 30,000 S32.742 1109 1400 $2/ 285 $90 9500 $21.828 $72.76_00 F • 1 Factory Industnal-Moderate I Iazard _ _ 1.5000 14.572 _ $31 2330 13 010 028 0275 $3.048 120.8220 _ _ _ - 7.500 $6 446 S70 2960 $5.372 $58 5800 54.297 $48 8640 15.000 511 718 153 1360' S9 765 144.2800 5.7,812 $35 4240 __ _ _ 30.000 $19.688 _ 5.357480 11640/ $297900 513.126 $23.8320 _, _ 75,00( 535,775 f450480 529813 $Sb 2900 $23.850 5306320 150 000 $70.236 346 8240 S58 530 5.39 0200 $46 824 5312180 F-2 Factory. IndustnaI-1 ow Hazanl _ 2.000 57.200 177 4713 56.000 $64.5594 54.800 551 6475 10.000 513398 $69 4800 511.165 $5/ 9000 $8.932 $46.3200 - 20.000 $20.346 152.2000 $16.955 $43 5000 $13 584 134.8000 - __. _ 40.000 530.786 5.33 StSO_f75555 5.279292 $20.524 5.223133 _ _ _ _ 100.000 150.895 $43 7250 5.47 413' $36 4375 133.930 $29 1500 • 200,000 594.620 $47.3100 5.78 850 339 4250 $63.080 $31.5400 H-1 , High Ha/aid Group H. 1 600 3.000 $2 098 069 3075 _ 01.748 53 135 157.75631 1/ 399 $46 2050 $40 8800 - Pose a detonation hazard $3.761 S61 3200 $51 1000 12.508 - 6.000 15.601 $47 5500 5.4 668 $39 6250 $3 734 $31.7000 12.000 08 454 $28.4833 $7.045 5.73 /361 1.5 636 118.9889 - 30,000 113 581 5.39 2900 $11.318 5.32 7417 59.054 526 1933 L _ _ _ - - 60.000 525.368 142.2800 S21 140 _ $35 2333 116,912 5.28 1867 H•3 Hrgh Hazard Group f 1-3 600 $3 207 $108.6000 $2 673 590 5000 $2_ 138 172.4000 ` _ Healy sr rpport combustion 3.000 $S 819 596 4650 54.845 580.7875 $3.876 064 3100 ' ._- _ - 6,000 58708 5./41150_ $7.256 $61.7625 55805 5.494100 _. 12,000 $13.154 545.3700 S10.962 5.378083 58.770 5.302461 _-. 30.000 5.21 321 561 4700 S17 76t 351 7750 514.214 540.9800 60.000 039 /62 $66 2700 $33.135 555.2250 326.508 344 1800 H-4 Ifigh Hazard Group H-4 ' 300 11.837 $109 5450 51 531 591.2875 $1.225 0/3 0300 • _ Pose health hazards _ _ 1 500 13 152 $95.0760 52 677 $79 2300 $2.101 563.3840 - T - -_ - 3.000 14 578 5.77 0280 $3,815 5.04 190a _ _ 53 052 5.51.3520 _ - 0•.0 5.6.889 541 7560 5.5.741 534 7967 04.593 5.27 8373 - _ - 15.000 _ 110647 0625080 08.873 $52.0900 5.7.098$418/20 ' 30.000 $20.023 $66 7440 $16 686 S55.6200 $13.349 1.44 4960 H • 5 High Hazard Group /I-5 1.000 $3 858 $76 2570 $3 715 $63 5475 $2.572 S50 8380 • Semcmx14 ir7re Fabrrcatron R&D _ 50000 _ $8908 $67.4280 55.757 S561900 _ $4805 S449520 • . _ • 10.000 110 2/9057 3680 $8.566 $43 6400 5.6.853 534 9120 • _ _. - 20.000 5.15 516 $31 2800 $12.930 $26.0667 510 344 $20 8533 _ -_ _ 50,000 $24.900 543.2400 _ 5.70750 1360400 $16.600 3288320 _ 100.000 $46.524 546 5240 $38.770 $38 7700 531,016 $31.0100 I.1 Inr.t,I Iurcrl ..17. persons ambulatory t 000 $5 378 $127 1220 $4.482 $105 9350 $3.585 $84 7480 ' _ . _ . _ 5.000 510.463 f 115 6080 58.719 5.96 3400 $6975 f 77 0720 _. _ 10.000 5.16.243 5.840240 5.13536 5.700200 $10.829 5.560160 , _ _ _ _ 20.000 $24b46 f57.9080 $20538 5482567 316430 $38.6053 . _ _ _ _ 50.000 5.42 018 5.71.3640 $35.015 559 4700 028 012 $47.5760 - 100.000 177.700 577 7000 $64.750 $W 7500 $51 800 051.8000 1•2 Institutional-6• persons r NM umbuldtory. 1.000 16.478 $14/ 5983 55.398 51229969 14.319 $98 3975 _• 5.000 112.382 5133 5150 010.318 0111.2625 5.8.255 S89._011 0 _ _ 10000 119.058 5982650 S15 881 1818875 512.705 $65 5100 ' _ -_, 20 OOUO $28 884 5.65 0450 524.070 5.54 9547 019 756 $43 9633 ' _ _ _ _ _ . _ 50.000 _ $48,668 5.83 0250 540.558 569.1875 532 415 $55 3500 100.000 590.180 5.901800 5.75150 5.751500 5.60120 5.601200 M M,'rranIIe- epanment 6 Drug Store 1 000 $3.714 $84 0540 13 095 $70 0450 S2 476 $56 0360 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5 000 37.076 $75 9600 $5.899 / 3000 S4 718 $50 6400 - _, _, _ 10 U00 1108/4 5560400 $9.062 _ _$63 $46 Non f/750 5373600 _ _ - 20.000 316478 5374320 013.732 $31.1933 $10986 $249547 _, _ _ _ 50.000 $27,708 54/.2800 523090 5.394000 518472 5.315200 100 000 $51.348 $51.3480 547. /90 547 /900 034 232 $34 232C MAXIMU ; Inr Paye 2 of 15 b126108 • 9 38 AM City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED Construction Type 1.14. la Construction Type NA. 60. Wt. NB. IV Construction type vA vs Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Bast Coif Coat roe IBC Project Size a Threshold Each Additional 0 Threshold Each Addiao..* a Threshold Each A,dt> io.d Size Class IBC Occupancy Type ThreshOld Size 100st' Size ' 10/st.' 100sf' M Mercantile -Market 500 $2824 $108.3600 $2.354 $90.3000 $1.883 $72.2400 • - 2.500 54.991 5.95.3040 54.160 5794200 $3.328 163.5360 - - 5,000 57.374 $74 9040 $6.145 $624200 $4.916 549 9360 10.000 $11.119 $43 5570 $9,766 $36 7933 $7413 579 0347 25,000 ill 652 361 5600 $14 710 551 3000 $11./68 $41 0400 - 50.000 133.042 $66.0840 S27.535 $55.0700 522.028 144.0560 M Mercantile-MolothxFdispensing 100 $4.673 $1.118.7675 53.894 $9323063 $3,115 $745.8450 - 500 S9.148 f 1,019 4300 $7,623 $849 5250 36.099 5679 6200 - 1 000 514 245 $737 5200 511.871 $614 6000 59.497 $491 6800 - 2,000 $21620 35129300 518.017 5427.4117 514.413 1341.9533 - - 5,000 537,008 3627.5700 530,840 5522.9750 524.672 5418.3800 _ - _ 10,000 $68.387 $683.8650 S56.989 5569.8875, $45.591 ;455.9100 M M Occupancy Tenant lmprovemenls 500 57.196 $880725 $7 8_30 $7_3.3938 $1.404 $58./150 • ,.- . _ . 2.500 $3,958 $IB 0600 $3 298 _ f65 Ufi00 12,639 152 0400 _ - - 5.000 $5,909 160.2550 $4.924 550.2125 13.940 $40.1700 - - 10.000 $a,922 136 4700 $7435 530 3917 55,948 524 313.1 25.000 _ _ $14.393 549 8900 511 994 541 5750 $9,595 533 2600 50.000 $26.865 $53 7300 $22.388 $44 7750 $17.910 $35.8200 R•1 Residential -Transient 1.000 14,146 $103.4820 $3,455 186.2350 52.764 $68.9880 - Boarding Houses Hotels. Motels 5.000 58.285 $94.8240 $6.904 $79.0200 15.523 $63.2160 - - 10,000 513.026 $676680 $10,855 3563900 58.684 - $451120 - 70.000 $19.793 $48 4040 $16.494 140 336/ 113.195 $32 2693 -- - 50,000 $34,314 $57.9240 $213,595 548.2700 S22876 538.6160 - 100,000 163.276 $63.2760 552,730 $527300 542184 5421040 R-2 Re s.dentialPermarent 2 • Dwelknys 1.000 f3.995 $99 8330 $3.329 $83 0775 $7,863 $06 4210 -_,_-- Apartment. Dormant). 1nneshare 5000 f/.980 191 2960 56.650 _ $760600 154.3000r _ $5.320 $60.8640 543.4100 - - ---- - 10.000 512.545 3651600 $10454 $6,36.3 • - 20.000 119,061 $46.5840 $15.884__ $38.8200 $12707 5310580 _ - - 50.000 $33 036 $55 7760 $77.530 $48 4800 $22 024 537.1840 _ 100,000 $60,924 $60.9240 550.770 5507700_ $40616 $40.6160 R-2 Residential -Permanent. 2•. Repeal 1.000 52.856 $48.7230 52380 $40.6025 it 904 S32.4820 - Apartment. Dorrngory, Timeshare 5,000 $4.805 141 8920 $4 00S $34 9100 $3.204 $27 9280 •a_10.000 _ 56 900 134 6560 $5.750 -- 128 8800 $4600 523 1044 - 20.000 $10 366 $17.8480 $8,638 $14.8733 $6.910 $11.8967 -- --- - -- - - 50.000 515.720 527.9120 513.100 123.2600 $10480 $tasoeo - 100,000 $29.676 $29.6760 S24.730 524 7300 $19 784 119 7840 _ R-3 Dwellings --Custom Humes 1,500 $4 765 SI70 8575 53.9/1 $142 3813 $3,177 S113.9050 •- 2.500 56,474 5120 7850 55.395 5103.6542 54.316 580.5233 - 4,000 $8,285 $133.0350 56.905 _ $110.8625 55.524 $88.6900 - --- - 5.000 59.616 $118.3950 58.013 198.6625 56411 $789300 - _ _ - 7,000 $11,984 $132.5950\_ $9.988 $1104958 S7,989 588.396/ - 10.000 515,962 $159 8150 $13 301 5133 0125 $10,641 $106.4100 R • 3 Dwellings -Production Phase 1,500 $7,447 1840300 $2.039 $70.0250 $1.632 $56.0200 o1 Master. Plan (repeats) 2.500 S3.288 $48.8250 $2.740 $40.6875 $2192 $32.5500 - - - - 4,000 $4.020 557.4500 53.350 547 8/50 $2.680 538 3000 -- -- - 5.000 54.595 5489450 13,679 540 /8/5 11063 5376300 - 7.000 $5.573 159 5200 $4 645 549 60000 $3.716 $39.6800 _ 10,000 5/ 359 - $73 5900 $6 133 561.3250 $4.906 $49.0600 R.3 Dwellings -Alternate Matenals 1.500 54.416 $153.6000 53,680 $128.0000 12944 $102 - `-- 2,500 15.952 $95.2650 54.960 $79 3875 V1.968 $63 5100 -- - - ----- -- 4.000 S7.381 $1095150 $6.151 $91 7675 $4.970 $73.0100 _ 5.000 38.476 5947550 37,063 578. 9625 55.651 $63.1700 - - --- --- -- - /.000 110371 S112.0050 S5.642 593.3375 $6.911 5746700 - 10,000 S13.731 S137.3100 5.11443 S114.4250 59.154 59154000 R-4 Resdentrat-Asslsted Lrrng (6-16 person) 1,000 55038 5118.3470 34.198 $98 6225 53.358 $78 89130 - - 5,000 $9.772 $107 5440 58.143 $896200 $6.514 $71.6960 _ - 10.000 $15.149 StEt 3120 $12 624 $65 2600 510,099 _ 552.2080 •- 20.000 322.960 553.7400 519.150 544.7833 S15.320 $358767 50.000 5.39.102 566.4440 $32.585 $55.3700 528.068 544 2960 - - 100.000 $72.324 5723240 $60.770 560 7700. $46 716 $48 2160 S-1 Storage--Mooe'ate f lazard 1 000 53.491 $58 8500 $2 909 $48 8/50 $39 1000 5.000 _ $5,837 _ $.50 7500 S4 8` 541 8750 _$2,327 53.891 $33 5000 10.0(10 58,349 $41 8900 56.958 534.9083 55.566 527 9267 20.000 $12538 $21.1900 $10.448 $17 6583 $8.359 514 126/ - - 50.000 $16.895 $33 6100 5.15, 746 $28 0013. 517 597 522.4067 - 100.000 S35.700 $35 /001 $29 750 $29 7500 S23.800 $23.8000 MA.XIMUS. Inc. Pays 3 of 15 6/26/08 - 9 38 AM City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED Construction Type IA,IB IBC Class S•1 S-2 IBC Occupancy Type Storage -Moderate H.lzard Hcparr Garage Motor Vehrles (not High Ha?arni Storage -Low Hazard S•7 Storage -Low Hazard. Parinng Garages Open or 1- ndused Other Tenant Improvements SHELL BUILDINGS 14 Shell Bldg Business-Pr0lessronal Office Other Shell Burldrn9 Proiect Size Threshold Constnic8on Type Con,trucUon Type IIA, IIB, IIIA, Ills, N VA, VB Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Each @ Each e • Each hr Teshold Additional Threshold Additional T7leetitiold Additional Size 10051' Size 18Osf' Size " 100sf' 500 7.500 5 000 10.000 25.000 50.000 1.000 5.000 10000 20.000 50.000 100000 000 1.000 5.000 111 000 20 000 50.000 100 000 600 3 000 6 000 120000 30.000 60.000 52.565 599.4250 52.137 $82 8542 $1. / 10 $66 2833 54.553 187.5900 53,794 $72.9917 53.036 5.583933 56,741 $68 5800 5.5,610 557.1500 $4.495 $45 /200 $10.172 S40 7367 58.477 $33.5306 $6.781 526 8244 $16.208 5564500 5.13506 54/0417 $10.805 5376333 $30.320 560.6400 $25,267 $50 5333 520,213 5.40 4267 $3.331 561 6620 52.776 551.3850 5.2 221 141 1080 $fi 798 553 8440 54.832 $44 8700 $3.865 535 8960 58.490 542 9960 St 075 $35 8300 55.660 $28 6640 512.790 524.1280 $10.658 _ S20 1067 58.576 516 0853 $20.028 535. 1120 516.690 529.2600 513 352 $23 4080 537.584 $37 5840 531.320 531.3200 525.056 $25 0560 52.953 $56 0600 37.461 5.46.7167 54.968 537 3733 55.195 149.2200 $4,329 $41 0167 5.3.463 _ $32.8133 5.7.658 1388600 $6.380 5.32.3833 55,104 525906/ $11.542 322 3600 59 618 $18.6333 57 695 514 906 / 518.250 5.31.8800 315 708 $26 5667 $12. 167 S21 2533 534.190 534.1900' 528.492 $28 4917 5.22 793 5.22 7933 52.307 580 0700 11.922 $66.7250 51.538 $53 3800 54.118 111 4300 _ 5.3.524 $59.5250 $2.819 5.47 6200 56.371 $54.3450 55.309 $45 7875 $4.247 $36 2300 $0 637 $33 9900 58,027 528.3250 5.6 471 577 6600 $15 750 $45 2/00 513.125 $37 7250 510.500 5.30.1800 529.331 $48 8850 $24 443 $40 7375 $19.554 5.32 5900 1.000 13.896 $83 5800 53.247 569. 6500 $2.597 $55 /200 5,000 $7.239 574 9400 56.033 562 4500 54.826 $49 9600 10.000 SIO 986 $56.3640 $9,155 $46 97000 57.324 537 5760 _20.000 5361120 S13.852 $30.0933 111 082 5240747 50.000 _ 5471600 522.880 $39.3000 118,304 5314400 100.000 ' • 151. 0360 $42,530 $42 5300 $34 024 $34.0240 _ 1 000 581 0450 53.323 $67 5375 52 558 554 0300 5.000 $12 0150 $6,024 560.0125 54.820 548 0100 10 000 1 830 555 7900 29.025 $46.0750 $7.220 $36 8600 20.000 116.359 S33 8700 513633 _ 5.78 2750 510 906 52.2.5800 50.000 $26.520 545 8700 $22.100 538.2250 $17.680 530 5800 100.000 $49 4550 $41.213 $41.2125 $32.970 $32 9/00 Facn addthr,o.d 100 spume feet or portion there0l, up to the next h.grlesl project vze IfifPf,114,k1 MAXIMUS Ind: Faye 4 01 15 6126/011 -'3 38 AM { City of National City Building & Safety Department New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class { Occupancy Type SF Standard Average Cost per SF . UNIT -COSTS... • . .'I Surplus;. Actual Currant jSubsidy) Unit Cost Foe I .Each Foe REVENUE IMPACTS Actual Annual Cost Annual Revenue 4 Current Fee Annual General Fund Subsidy Subtotal A-1 Assemby—R.xeo Sestno • Tneale, Cancer Hall A. AssamoIy—FCo0 & Jr,nk - Resat.rar•t. \19hi Club Bar 000 5300 • 13 00C 23 000 50 00C • 100 00C 1 00C 5 OOC { 1000C 20 30C 50 30C '00 OOC A. assembly—Ahorsh.o An•user,ev Arad.. Churc❑ Comml.nm, rail 1 30C 5 OOC 10 00C 20 O0C 50 00C 100 00C 4.4 Assamolv--IncoOr Sport viany Afena Skat.np R ik Ter n,s Coun 1 000 • 5 00C - I 10 oocc l f 2 00 0C• 50 00C ' '00 00C A DccJoalcy Tarant •mprcvemer z 400_ __200C 4 C0C 8 GOC 20 COO 40 C 30 10C 53C 1 CDC 2 COO 5 0000C 10 030 3n.ness—C1.11C Our5I•r 10C 500 1 000 2 000 5 000 10 000 31263 3 3.125 $ - $ (3126) 12614 f 6.307 $ S (8.307) 0 9960 3 9.960 5 5 (9.9601 07571 $ 15,142 f - ' 5 (15'42) 0 5280 5 26.403 S - S (26.400) 0 4863 5 48,633 S ' $ (48.630) 35802 f 3.580 3 - 5 (3.580)1 14315 $ 7,156 f $ (7158) 1.1256 f 11 256 5 • - S (1'. 256) 0 8552 f 17.104 $ - S (17 104). 0.5932 3 29,680 $ S (29 880)• C.5469 $ 54690 $ S (6469C). 3 2732 f 3,273 $ • 5 (3 273). 1 3452 9 3.728 $ 1 92C $ 14 506), 1 C709 f 10709 $ - $ (10 7091 0e146 f 18298 3 • S (15295). — 0 5742 $ 28 71o f 5 (25 710)1 cs2et $ 52A10 f 5 (52510)i 3 3534 $ 3,353 $ - 5 ,3 353j 1 390a -.lie ,ie $ 6.954 $ • , $ ,6 954)1 s 11 11e s s (11.11)I 0 8463 f 16,929 3 - 5 (18 9261i 0.5995 S 29.375 3 • 5 (29 975) 0 5508 f 55.380 $ - S (55 080) 3.2758 f '.310 $ 5 (1310) 1.2302 S 2 460 f 6 217 5 5 757 0.9384 $ 3 754 $ 1 815 5 (1 939) 0 7.04 $ 5 ee3 s • s (5 583) 0.4729 $ 3 455 $ 5 (9 458) _ 0 4390 f 17 560 f 5 (17 560) 28.3335 S 2.833 $ S ;2 833) 13,1389 5 9 569 $ 5 to 6691 10.8666 S 17.969 3 - S (10 989) 84074 s 16 815 $ 5 (16 615) 62627 f 31 414 $ • 5 (31414)J 5.7241 $ 57 241 3 5 (57 241, 25.7305 f 2 573 $ • 5 (2.573) 12.2252 f 6 113 $ • 5 (8,113) 13.711 $ 10171 s s (10171) 7.7774 $ 15 566 f - 5 (15 555) 5.777e $ 2e 889 s - 5 (26 66s) ' 5.2889 s 52 989 $ • S (52 8891 V w'LICS. Inc. Pape c C' 15 S f f s - $ - f - f - $ - S 1 f - 3 - f s f $ --- -----5 --- f S $ S S $ $ 3 f - f $ $ f s $ - s • f $ f f f 6.726 s 1.920 $ 14 aoe)j f 3 - S f - S •f f— $ - s _ s s - s - s $ (a.aa), s - s s - s $ s s s $ - s - s - S - S f S S • ' f f• S - f f 12,302 S 41086 f 28784 S 7.5C7 3 3 833 $ 13 977)1 LS s• $ -- S - S - f f S - S S 24,906 $ - f - $ • f - S - S S - f - f 3 - S •f S • $ •$ f - $ - $ f f 3 f f - f - ._..._.. _.- S $ s 1 . - .. _ • • 6:25:Ce-913AM City of National City Building & Safety Department New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class Occupancy Type SF -Standard Bus,ness-Dry Ciean,-,p B.rs,..,ess-Proreuicnai C'ece 5C0 2.500 5 000 10 COO 25 OOC 50,3OC 000 s 000 10.0G) - I 20.000 • 50 000 13C000 5.s Hess-�+ gn R'se C'6ce 8 Occupancy Tenart i-norooer•,e•1ts • Educal onau-Group Occuoa-1cy • 6• persons up to tre +2tr G-aie • c du:anona1 -Da,, Care 5• cndd'en. c•der tan 2 1.2 yrs F-1 Factcy industna,•--Moderate Hazaro 5 COC 25 OOC 53 JOC 1 C).303 253 OCO '00,000 250 1 250 2 500 5 OOC 12 500 25 00C 503 25C3 5.000 • 1_ 10,000 25 000 5C 000 _ 30C 1 50C •3 303 6.000 15.0C ) 30.000 1 500 7 500 15 000 30 OOC 75 000 150.003 UNITiCOSTS.,..,• •. .-. t,1 "Swptuii- Averap, • . Actual 'Currant (Subsidy) Cost pir'SF' Unit Cost Fee Each Fos 4.4100 1.5802 1.1760 0.8876 G 5700 C 5325 $ 2 205 ' S - 3 r2 205) $ 3951 $ . 3 f3951) $ 5 sea f 3 876 $ 14.250 5 26,625 3 4011 5 3.401 3503) S 6 752 3 • 5 (5 880) $ - f (8 876) f • $ (14 250) f - f )26.625; S 970 5 - 1.0583 $ 10583 S 3.240 S (2.431) $ ;6 752) f 7 343) 0.8037 $ 16 074 f 2.375 S (13 099) 05551 $ 27755 f '2957 5 'ta 788) 0.5121 f 51,210 f - 5 (5' 210.1 3 es77 1 C' 21 G 8625 S 18.339 $ 25.303 S 43 130 C 6927 5 59.270 0 4835 S 12C 875 3.4714 f 235 700 f 1031 S 1887 37166 5 1.858 $ - f (18 339; $ • f i25.3C3; f - f .43.133' 5 - $ (59.270) 5 - $ ;120.875) S - f (235 730) $ • 4930 S 3 733 5 • 1765 f 5 883 S - S (18511 S 3 733) f ;5 853) 0.8941 $ 8 941 $ S 'e 541) 0.6219 $ 15.548 S - 5 ;15 548) 0 5731 5 28,655 $ • 5 ;25.5551' 5 3928 $ 1 618 2 C316 f S 3047 S 1 5521 S 4E56 f ' •752 5 )7841 S 0.7276 2.5395 0 7162 06510 7C751 11 762 $ 21 828 f 3 810 f f 5 372 9,7 S S 5 f f - f ('618) - 3 (J047 f (4 656) f 7051) f (11 762) 475 $ (21 828) 5 (3 335) 5 (5 372. 0 5469 $ 16 407 $ - $ (18.4C7 0 3975 5 29.813 $ - f t29.813; 0 3902 5 50.530 5 - f (58 530; Page 6 of 15 REVENUE IMPACTS • Annual Actual Annual ,. RevenU. Cost I CurrentFee Annual Oaneral Fund Subsidy I Subtotal f S $ f S f $ 5 5 S 3401 f f 5 10.583 S 32 143 3 27.755 $ f 970 5 .2431) 5 f 3.240 f 5.951 f 2957 f 5 S 5 S S - if S (7 343. S (26197'. -- $ .14 7e5' $ • $ (50,759) f f 5 5 5 S S 8.248 1 $ 4.055 S (4 132 f 1,857 $ 572 f t- 295; $ 8.284 $ 4.725 f (3.659; 3 8 443 $ E 690 f ;1 753; $ - $ • 5---- f 5 $ - f (10.8991 3 _ 5 S - 5 5 5 -- --- • IIS S 5 S S f 5 5 5 S _5 - 5 f f 5 f f S 3,810 S f 475 $ (3.3351_ f S 3 f (3.336) 6.23'C8 -938 AM 4.1238 5 537 S (524) 1.4935 S 572 5 ,1 295) +,1175 $ 2.795 f 1 575 $ (1 22C) 0 8443 $ 4.222 f 3 345 S C 5469 5 6.838 3 • S (6.838' C 5101 $ '2,753 f - f {12 753; City of National City Building & Safety Department New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS •. SF Class) Occupancy Typo Standard F-2 Factor, (ndus'ral-Lov. Hazard 2000 1 C 000 2C 000 40 000 _tJ000 200.000 r•t I -ogn -anew Group -(•1 6C0 • °cse a detonar yr oazard _ 3.000 6.000 12.000 33.000 • - 6J 000 (1go Hazard Group M•3 Rea0Hy support comCus:ocn 600 3 000 6030 :2000 30,000 80.000 Hitn Haza•o Group'•.c Pcsa nowt)" nazards _ '.500 • 3.003 B_000 f 1530C 33 000 3C0 H-5 H.g(• Hazard Group H•5 - 3enconductor Fabr,:andn. R6C 00C 5 I COC 10 C30 20,000 50 C00 130 000 i-I Irs1du1 Dr 91-17. De'LJns arnbt.:ator; 000 5.0CD • 10_000 • _ 2.00 300 50.30C ,0C 000 I nslnunonal-6• pa'adrs nor -a Ia:cry 1 00C 5 C00000 1 C.000 20,C00 •I(-50.000 130.000 Average , Cost par 3F UNIT CASTS Actual =Cutr}nt UnitCost, Fs' �. 4urp�u>t!•, ISubsIdy)' Each Fes' 2 4001 $ 4 803 $ 0 8932 S 8 932 $ 0.6782 $ 13 564 S 0.5131 0.3393 3.3154 3 4967 $ 2C 524 1 S f 33 93C S $ 63.C80 S 2 C98 5 REVENUE:IMPACTS Actual Annual Cost Annual Revenue la Current Fos Annual Osmral Fund Subsidy Subtotal S (4 800) S 5 ,8932) 5S _ • _ 5 S (13564) ---• 5 5 $ (2C.524) 5 - 5 - $ 133.930) $ - 5 $ - $ (63.080) $ $ S - $ (2.098) $ S 3 (3.78:), 3 - S $ (56001 3 - 3 $ - $ (8.454) 2538' S 3 781 J a335 5 5,601 $ $ 0.7045 0 4527 0 4228 3 5635 5 $ 454 $ 13.581 $ • $ :13.561) $ 25 368 3 2138 1.2919 $ 387e S $ $ 0.9675 $ 0 7338 $ 0.4738 5 805 $ 8 770 1 s $ 14 214 5 0.44:6 $ 26,508 51040 S 1,531 5 $ 1 7511 2717 0 9568 0 5915 S 2.627 $ 3.815 $ $ $ 5 74: $ $ 8,873 C 5562 $ 16 688 $ $ S (25 368) • S (2 138) • 5 (3 876), - S _{5 805) 3 (8 770), $ (14.2,4) $ (26,538) $ (1.531' S (2.627) S (3.815) f (5 74)) f (8 873) 5 (16 888) 34,8$ 3.215 S - I S (3 215) 1.1513 0 8586 0.6465 0.4150 3 3877 S 38 770 $ 4.4816 5 4482 7438 s 8.7.9 1 3538 5 '3 536 10269 S 20.538 07003 f 35.015 C6475 5 64.752 $ 5757 $ - 5 ;5757) $ 6 566 $ - 5 (8 566) S 12 93C $ - $ (12 930) $ 20 750 I S $ (20.750), $ (38 770) S • $ (4 482) f - $ (8,719) $ - 5 ,-13 536) $ - 5 ,23.538,, $ • $ 135.015) $ - $ ;64.753' 4.3,86 f 4319 S • S (4319) t.8509 $ 8 255 $ - $ (8 255) t 2705 $ 12 705 $ - 0.9828 $ 19 25e $ - 0.8489 S 32 445 $ _ J.6C•25 8C 12C 5 MAXI'AUS. i1C. Pape 7 of 15 5 (12 705) $ (19 258) $ (32 445) f (8C 120) S $ 5 $ 3 5 - 5 5 $ $ 5 rf $ 5 $ f - Is • S - 'S '5 • s $ 5 $ $ S $ $ $ $ f 5 5 $ e 5 s $ - 5 ---- 5 $ $ 3 3 - S • T$ $ $ $ S f $ $ 6.26iO3 • c na, r City of National City Building & Safety Department New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class Occupancy Type EF. Standard f✓ercant 1e-_Departmenr d C•ug Store 1.000 5 COO 1C C30 2C 00C 50 00C 1C0. 3C0 Me•cantde-Market 5C0 2.5C0 5000 10 000 25 000 50 000 Mercantile -'.Motor fuel -a spens(ng Al �' Ccct.oarcy Tenant Improvements R R Res.4e11 al --raps ent • &arwing Houses Hcteis Motels Res.dent.a(-Permanent. 2• Cwesmgs Apa•tmen: CDm Ior, T.resia•e Resi0en5a.-7armaneit 2• Repea: AOarrent 0cmatory Timesnare '.IA.X)'•1US, ("1:. 10C 50C 1.300 2.000 5.000 0,000 500 2 500 5 000 1C 00(LI 25 OOC 50.000 '.003 _5,000 IIF '0.000 20 C00 5C 000 00 00C 1 DOC 5 300 13.0C3 20.000 50.000 130.000 1 000 5 00C 1C OOC - 20 30C - 50.000 10),0C) Ul4TGE7>31S'.�: Y: :r • Avsrag.'.. ••ACtiusi •Currant (Subsidy) Costp•(sf 'Unit Costl' Fos Each Fsa 3.0952 1 1794 S 3.395 $ 5 897 C 9062 0 8866 C4618 0 4279 4.7070 •.8638 f 1.2290 S - 0.9266 S 0 5884 f 9082 S 13 732 5 S 4 f - S (3 0951 S• 5 (5 857) f - S (3 062; $ - $ (13732; 23.090 3 • S (23 090; 2.'30 S S (42,7a0) 2354 5 4 16C S 6'45 5 9,265 f $ 14 713 C 5507 31 1512 12 1913 S 27.535 S 3'15 S 6 099 9 4966 5 9 497 7.2067 $ 14 413 f ;2 354) $ '4 15C) f - f • S S S 4.9344 S 24 672 5 4.5591 S S (6 t451 S (9 268) S (14,7101 S :27,535) S (3'15) S (6 099; f [9,497) S f S (14 413) (24 672) (45 591) 2 9284 S 1 464 f • 5 (1 464) 1.0554 S 2.639 $ 1 588-M c• 051)1 01 7879 f 3.940 $ 2 00C f (1 943), 0 5948 5 5.948 S • $ (5.948) C.3838 5 9.595 $ • f A.5951, 0 3582 S '7,910 $ _ $ (•7.910; 3.4546 S - • _3808 $ 1.0855 S 0 8247 S 3 455 5 8904 S 10 855 S 16 494 S S 3455) f (6904) 5 (10 855) 0.5719 5 28.595 $ - 5 '26 595)1 C 5273 S 52,733 $ $ '52 77.0% 2 3289 S 3.329 S • S (3.329) 13303 S 6.650 f 5.050 S (1.560) '.0454 S '0454 S - $ (-0.454) ).7942 $ 15 854 5 • $ (*5 8841 0.5506 $ 27 530 $ 16.777 $ (10 7531 0.5077 $ 50 77C f - 5 (SC 77C ) 2.3804 f 2 380 0 8009 f 4.005 C 5750 f 5.750 C 4319 S 8 638 0 2620 5 13 100 024736 24.730 • S 12 38C1 • S (4 005) - $ (5 750) • f (8 S 5 $ ("3•to0; S (24 '30) :+'•-.. REVERUETMIP='S ,Annual, Annail • ActualAnpual Rsvonue • 'General Fund Cost • ' Current Fos Subsidy Subtotal f S S 5 S S - s S S S S S f f S f S S S S S 5 S S S 5 - S S • f $ S 97625 S 58,739 f S 15 758 f 8 C30 3 S • S 5 S - S 5 - f S - S S f f $ (38 886)_ $ -7 758) $ • $ 5 f s S f f $ f 5 S $ 5 f (48 8441 f S 65 45C 5 65 17C 5 S J 5 S•S (2C 28C) 55.060 S 3.3.554 $ :2'.5C5 011,786) S 5 5 5 Page 80'15 6,26:08-93e-M.:. City of National City Building & Safety Department New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class Occupancy Type SF. 'Standard P-3 Di-Custor' -,omes 50C 2 50C 4 00C 5 000 7 030 ' 0,000 R-3 Dwellings-Prod).clon Prase _ 1.500 of,'as:e' Pan (repeats, I 2`0 Ir 4,000 5 000 7,000 10.000 P. OweII,ngs-4 temwe 'dater els 1.500 �2 500 5_0C' 5 3OC 7 000 10 00C R-4 Resden:41--Assisted L r g (6.16 persons) 1 00C 5 000 10 000 20.000 50.000 100.000 -1 Storage-loderate Hazar0 1.000 5.000 . 10.000 20.000 50 30C - '03,000 S:orege-Moderate -ezard Reps.- Ga72e Moto- Ven :Jes lOt Mfi9n Heza(c) 5-2 Stor806-4ov. Hazard 50C 2 500 5 000 IC 000 25.000 L 50,000 5 1,000 .000 • 10,000 - _ 20 000 50000 c 3.000 UNIZ.COSTS Average'.; Actual -'Current.' ;ISub$Idy)- Cott peaSF 'Uhlt Cost Fee - 1 Each Fee 2.11283178 $ 3.177 5 2.225 5 i 952) t 71281807583 4318 f - 5 i4316) .1809 ff 5 524 f - 5 j5 524) 1.2821 S 6411 $ - $ (6.411) 1.1413 $ 7 989 15 •$ (7 989) 1.0641 5 10841 5 - 5 ('0641) 1.0677 S 1 632 ' 5 '.985 f 353 0.8'87 f 2192 5 0.5700 $ 2,880 S 0.8128 5 3.C83 S 0 5308 f 3 716 S 0 4906 5 4,906 S 1 9825 5 2,944 15871 $ 3.988 1.2301 $ 4,920 11301 S 5.65• f 6.914 f 9154 4.1981 S 4 198 0 9677 0.9154 f '2.192) S (2.880; S (3.063) f (3718), S (4,906) S f (2.944) • $ (3 988) (4 920) (5 661) (8 914) (9 154)I $ is!! 1.6286 f 8 143 I S 1.2824 $ 12 824 $ 3.9576 S 19,150 S 3.6517 5 32,685 3.6027 S 80.270 34905 $ 3,491 t 1673 S 5)537 0 8349 S 8 349 08289 S 12538 03779 S 18,895 03570 f 35,700 5 1295 1 8213 1.3488 1.0172 0 6482 0.6064 $ f S $ f S 5 S f (6 143) $ ('2.624L f (19,150) 5 (32,586) f (60,270; $ (3,491) f (5.837) 5 (8.349) $ {12,538) f (18.895. $ ;35 700) f 2.585 $ • S 12,565). $ 4.563 5 - _y $ .. (4 55311 f 8�743 f - f (8 743) $ 10172 5 • 5 (1C 172) f 16 208 5 - 5 (18 208) f 3C 320 S - f (30 32C) 2.7781 $ 2 776 f f '2 776) 3.9083 5 4,632 3.7075 $ 7,075 _ 35329 5 •0.855 0 3338 S 16.e90 - _ 63132�5 31,320 f 807 $ (4 026) f 3 t90 (5,885L 5 4 415 f _ ''6.243) $ _ _ S t' 6.690) 3 S .31 320; MAY 'L)S :'1c. Page 0 0' 15 i REVENU IMPACTS Annual Aetual Annual' .Rev-anue Cost . Cur»nt Fs* Annual General Fund Subsidy Subtotal S 24 944 . 5 24 475 5 :10 465) 5 _ S - • $ - - 5 - $ •5_ S - ' 5 - 5 5 - 5 •f 89 735 5 5 '09 155 S 19 419 $ f 5 3 $ • • $ (10,489) 19,419 $ S $ $ f • f $ s S 5 - S e S S f S f 5 f f $ f - ,_S - - 5 -- - • 5 - ,5 - 5 19 328 ' $ 3 228 $ () 8 098) 5 7375 5 3.9C 10858 $ 441.5 e 5 885) 5_-- E243) $ (28.226) 6.26,23-F 18P.' City of National City Building & Safety Department New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class Occupancy Type SF Standard S-2 Storage —Low Nazar. Park n6 Garages _ 1 OCO Caen or Enclose] 5 COO• I C030 20 00C 53 00C 160.000 - Ctrer Tenant Irroro:emen:s 603 3 OCO 6.000 12 000 3C 00C 60 30C SHELL BUILDINGS B I Stall 5']g 3us,ness—.rcfessioral Once 1.000 5.000 • :0 000 • 2C C00 - I 5C 000 I r '00,000-I Cner Snell Bc i.rng '.000 5.000 • 0.0c0 • 20 C00 • SC C30 • I 10C 00C UMT.CO&TS .. Ayaoga• Cost par SF 'Surplus Actual Currant (Subsidy) Link Cost Faa Each Fes .,cv a c aos a 5 (2.953) 1.039C 3 5.195 $ 1 (5.'S5) 0.765E $ 7.658 S - S (7.658; _ 0 5771 3 11.542 $ S (11 542) _ 0 3650 S ' 8.250 $ S t' 8.250) 0 3419 S 34,190 S 20.370 $ ('3 820) 2 56281 S 1 638 S 780 $ (778) 0.9396 $ 2 819 r S 355 S 2 464, 0.7C79 $ 4 247 $ $ (4 247. 0.5351 S 6421 S S (6421) 0 350C S 13.500 $ • S (10.5C3; 0 3259 S 19.554 $ $ .19.554; itEVENUEIMPA-CTS Annual - Actual Annual Raysque. Cost ILtD ', Currant Fa* Annual General Fund Subsidy Subtotal S - S S - S s - s 5 _ - 5 S 34.190 S 20.370 S '3 839 S S 19 732 S S 3 S S S 5 • 6.840 2.485 s s S S n 3 823; S 113,820) 3 (6.999' S '7.247) S • S 5 5 (24.2461' 3 2465 S 3 247 1.2085 3 6 033 0.9155 0.6926 C 4576 6 4253 2 6583 3.9639 3.7220 0.5453 0.3538 C 3297 S S 3 9.155 S - $ 13.852 S $ 22.8E0 S S 42,530 S $ "3 247L 5 (6 033) i 5 19 155; S 113.852j, S ,22.883) S 142,530) $ 2.658 3 $ (2 658) S 4620 $ - S ;482ia S 7 220 i - S r7 220, S 10 906 S - S ;13 906) $ 17.680 S • S i 17680) S 22.973 S - 3 (32,970) 3 S S 3 $ 3 S S $ S 5 3 3 S 3 3 3 S 3 S S '•l&X(MUS Inc. Page 1C o115 Total Revenues $ 615,565 3 426,902 I $ (188,653)1 $ (188,663)1 6,26.33-238A:' City of National City Building & Safety Department MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING PERMIT FEES FEE TYPES .UNICO11TS. �1 LOW 11511.151 t . Awfi( 99 11984Ie31 CO9t Covent Fee Per Unit 3 195 ActiW Arriwi • • AVENUE lMPAOYS • Ann9.11h s I9S Cerra nt Fee A,.W13 beMrai Feed 3o411ey. RECOMMENDED FEES Recommend. we Fee Pere.m Pudic Subsidy Recovery Per Unit AD rt i'ISTRAPvE AND PAISC FEES 7•a411/.ne OaPInar'r cr`a,3a.c :7by, Tqr•1 ado 3Cc4n.rq_ c - s.a[P adct,Onal e.` Pan- •t,.nc. 1 .•EC.And CA_ PER e1T FEES } 59.07 3 It 73! 3 (13C7' $ 53.35 1 3 (59351 } 59.39 1 >)» 1 3 [9351 3 )3,579 1 , 3 22316 3 76052 $ .s9171 - 3 5300 9997•. 3 3 ! 5900I 993e•, S 1e e50 s ;3,63t31 r3 59 cc 95 3t f C C7 3 C 35 5an].Io410 ur.,Ina. Plen Cnc• ,novn3rn 3 S uNiT FEES _ _ _ 3 3 . C "Pee 3•,4eL eau'._ _ I $ '.mace. ,•7. A u Flo,. - $ .re, (Ws eMce-:•e •C,.'n,eY Qmf, 21tn9d•.840, Ccr3'..t.•• _1 69.3e Bc s C, t•I ,..•FI P. "p 15.Oa.9. 1.'n :• nMt.r -l• , R.c-.n• ••c , A • ncndeer Duo wont ort. .•,e :coy, ti tl1!.•up a • SYlierr ew..! E.,euei Dac: :C'c•'.e 0_j.-_ vrl can ,,a ' u:o • each 3 eYl vent System 3 29..099 E.na..• -.cos era D,.- if es o•,ua_, fetal: Fo>] • Type ii I0CCmr .'c.. 3...s. r0,1, E.'+u.a n30. T E4 I •-r-I.. 11, Sllar+.cow non.R.eld.r', t Iron•r.:0• _ R.b 9.•elot r0.n4.r A.-,,:. t`Nt.n Ea. a.'y.'.tor cos. _.._..__ / h( 29 69_ 2909 9. . p.PN , 124411 1' ($OW $931 3 se co 3' 1' j. :29091 .31; r -�1a3 [ (59lf1 .1 (51.w 4' .(3311 -9 a 3 �3 3' • $ 3 3 3 4.{. • )2.7 ($ •.3,P 1- �-:.. (S21 2903, 77ell'- f 0e9 j., *I• '><- - .. i55ea3 f•` : 'l19) 2• o0 9'.eett C e9 $ ,.: -;t11'.$.? .•.''S•000�`9v,.4' .••. SSJ 79.00 9. 66% f 059 . -:.E• �K y, 43w ,'3 ,:. ! _ '90C 9603% 1 Cry -39 CC 99 7¢% 3 _. C 39 • : ' . 3 69.CC 39 36% 3 0 36 _f_,.• .6FI1. .. ,�,.��.jj�99eQQ.... f;.Y.t35 I 3 s9. 0 99 •% $ 031 _-. 71_ 1,FYt.l: �• - '-,•,A3$) $ 2400 S7eVe 3 059 d1-, 3 79 03 97 91% f 209 $ 2G 00 9 0•v. 0.53 8 59 00 99 39% 3 0.39 �.. 1.,.• :::.. Se. , ,:,1t,`4 .�$.. • 3 2930 9.M% f oe9 • f 59 00 M 30% s C.3t 1. J� lY> . . $ -- 900 90 Ws, 090 9 oc 90.91% 1 C 93 29.00 C 59 3 -• 9. '''%a- 3: S 29.00 9' ee% 059 c 9 . t:' it..•!'..t.:� .:.? : • • $ s9.00 S9 bx 03e 55 CO 99Y3% $ 039 s9 03 99 304 3 )9 3 5900 9930+ 331 $ 3937 9938N f 039 • 3 $ i • .h- .1• • • f- 3r , ot•5 RECOMMENDED REVENUE ACtual Annual Cost Annual Rhesus S RIC'a Fee Annual dubl,o Subsidy S 33f :9I3 31553 3_ 3 :: i6i 3 l 3 ]2 243 (1 ( 1 .- ,-a: 1 3 3 $ 1 1 1 s 3 .L_C27 3 505_} 3'9 $ __ e •931$ 1^2 $ 1 tie + -30 1 23 3 3 -5 3 3 59 3 208 2C3 3 5 1 1 3 . .i__ } 11f +1e s 3 {1{ s j . f • 1 s • J S • rs S { f S_ 3 59 5G } 3 i -• 3 - . • 3 6 26,0° ' :S.t.1 City of National City Building & Safety Department MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING PERMIT FEES FEE TYPES 11NIt COSTS Actual Unit Cott ' s /91 A.strsp9.' Curer, Far • i9NP1w7, $3u9,1y1` •:'YarunlP, A . CAn:W1 . lEYkiAliPltc :. • 1rMu�l �)a�w7et�t161irM Qlrjt/11 7 e C9mnt e.9: •:FAnjty96ter RECOMMENDED FEES Recommend. Id Fee Percent Reco...ry Ps100e Su5a•dy Per Unn RECOMMENDED REVENUE Ac9,aI Ann, J Coat PLUMBINGIGAS PERMIT FEES Annual Ravenna. ',oar Publm R. o Fee I Subsidy !taro $Jry P,.ma:7.P1y1 CR.> Inc.,', ralel UNrT FEES. I+1.,41 eafJ1L --' Gu Seater 1c11 Colo, Gas Oulats (E,_, cdd;nna�t - Ec.ld.rg Stowe. -- 3an6o, o.e.., e' t i ers. < 3aala4 as ..r•. • (t.lc,. :,an 5) . uc, Pow Mar . i,.rwamt S,ttr, VVal.r MM. F.r11 Meaty 1'SW•i• H554 .Ead'I'Cd .Or4 Maalarl C'e.+•. or• ie; a_' 4teraTIcrl Saw Amu Sy", Font," .131,1 aa4Wa tams wa'e• r.atrrwrl .3a a.••am) Grainer Systems •_.• nma Mac cal Ga. S, .m (E act ^. e•• ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 79. 3 9.10 t 2909 f $ 29.99 5 1 19 7 3 19.7/ 197, 2999 5 59•)a f 37 )0 3 253) 2! CJ SC CC 3. CC t 3570 3' : • 3 • t:•,1, :. 33, $ • .••37e •3 1►1 ee .j77•• 4Y.eQ`. •ate:-.._ep. 3 3' t• • • •'so a21 1•aleca I 1 S.31 RS 1 11 JO $ SC CO 3 . •30:21 t • '7 (216oy ! J39a3a3 r of •.76 3 a 3 ; ..' t 2'12 t_ 1Ta7}5. Ra(., C.'.. 316 }. } • 2a0 3 IS $ 3 9 CC 3 +9 CO 9OC EC 54% 9•_ 95% 90 946i s $ 3 5 2900 9769a. 3 79 OC 97 68% 5 +3 33 95 99% 5 .)3 9)5.u, 3 !902 9936% 3 976e% $ 95 9975 25 CC +9 CC 19 CC -90C 2900 9! 95% 95 99% 97.63'. 59 00 99.36% 3 •13 J) n;ersl3 G 7) 5) 96', 3 • 1 f t f S•1 3 s• Is • $ s•ft C73 3 3) .7 C 79 f 376 363 C9C f 5 CeS f 115 •le f 065 t )C 23 $ 0 '9 3 70 15 f 795 f • 3 0711 J59 5 7157 3 0 79 S C 77 5 C 79 3 Ce5 039 3.76 ).90 S 3 3 15 153 .0 3 r3 f - 500 3 +52 3 33 3 2 • SUrc AIya EI.c'.r,l P,n CrKa onatjate, SVS•EM FEES. Now 7auIt.•FamIly IS nil . °Mu Sa,v:. mac I)) a.npn Trr.. 0r,1. $ov.C. i .r •X amF1` all Omer Types dt Confnact.on 15 v 7C a o • Fast 1) C',cmts lnc-o +' a' 7C amp . neat 9C <attn. (each_ +5 c 70 arnnp__•_>:r 1CC a<ana [eau.. 2510 <7 amp o•a,.is (.aa•1 50+c +73 amp b'Nls eaFn 700 a,rp 4,0 Ike, ur,.nf lu.r T..npo.ar, Sarmc. (..CN_ TIZ2Yary PoIa (.,cn P•e.IrsO.c,Ior ar rcrl Gees,.' a' In.Yaton (F e, • I: 1,1AEIV 1 5 Ir: V nubs Cansam.o 3 • 3 } $ 3.5,0 $ • 31:30 3 t 19.7a 3_ .990 3. J30.511 i1'Is6.314 3. 3 25CC $ 32' 1 9.94 $. ' -I5,94, $ }..' .., 3 29319 I $... (29,99• $ 3159 f $ 28 )) 4 : C7.661 s a9,41 s „0) :3 : 23.52' t :. • 16i: r • r_ 1.s _d•y', yrr,„..i {(pp(r*V.ru -;r:5 7... i1.l''F ,tiar 1 1 - .r..:: - •.• } : *`M9N$ is. •z• $1 :.�( s : • { y1.1 Revenw t 66 112 I f 10,383 t (5,4391 F age '20115 35 C3 59 CC t 38 57% 99 36 3 ) 59 3 0 39 3 • 5 L '9.00 95.95% 930 9094% 5 )) 6. 201. • 24 03 39 CO 49 CC 97 6arw 9e 57% S9 C2•: 290C 9'ea% 19 00 9• 69% • .13 )) 99 365s • )) 3749,. CJ9 0 SC 094 se) ) 59 ces C es • 0'6 7 69 3 1 f f 1 3 1 S• f S• f f a51 3 a17 3 3• 1 $ • 3 S S • 3 t t • s 5 • t t s 953 33 9)6 1 1. f 2 C 72 3 ; 5.6 2e $ $ 3 . $ !3< 445 s :12 S _ a25 • s • • 1• • 3 Total R.Fommandeo Ra venue 46.127 I S 51.22 3 400 5,2699 . 9 )e A1A City of National City Building & Safety Department MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Work Item UNIT 'COSTS Plan CRoot Actual Coe* inspection. T.41Aetual AFtual.Coot 6.4 P10647- etirylml.- Ayen9...1i4b$I ry Currint.Poo . Pee UnK Star card -o,n, Rau a_don•< 2�1a n; In.�ea•c r_•e_- <fIM�Y PerT •r . �•_el 1. F• Firma "em;o•ary J%I NO. ".Ps _agar, JsePsrml. ypl 3 a nl•nna--• T•.I;o•n F a. 'L EquPmen_C,nta_rr'__ C•IJar.Yoode Plon< ...I•.ndnp CIIJar143o46 Pn0re .:J4ocal.cr Appeal c'<e a1•mer''DL4 - :..•. n2'CanOp, ;' F eo o> 2i6. 29 B.Icon7 AdOnon . Bu 17 rt9 MUYny.op_caon Fee_ :upon 7 Cse E o,I no :•oen.n ,i .•.4-npnnc• ntJ•d+ldr l.l. r4FI]ions CC8n6o Ccr.a't.or Cc13trLC'. 31 4 :e »o. uon F 4e _ CO.er.0 Demunlcr-Rea Canal 1,81.6, Deno teat 'e _ Don4 nCn-R•s.Jen1W Derr°, l (7,-,,A4oF a•v:ra, 2ocur'•r+l Resea Vt Fes 'ere. 0• r'ee11lr l.19 WI.. fdn.ma.o ram '61e4t In hcia Earn adclllcnal '0311 For co 0r 7,gl4]a,dInQ ,0491 r'.tJ'trt_. .! Vslm nP2't Eamsod :ow IOC • F t.plc4 5'1a3'Yy Pra-Fatr_etwootaI Flag P_tlle over 30 ler -•na0nl Anac-s0 :.Iacnsc 5 y.n'13uIS .non•Cc,m.r6a. 'an•71Lnpscncn Foos 41)1.111e _ -_ _ .15 ocr adml 151.1 :s 83C, add. 9C • 43gIs Mom• V goL8 None e tie Par t o1--Co n revel Int•n3- luo 10 30' ac3 JMI pam:3n Par,uortiR..d•r' a ,term, („ p'0 30 I . - _ec Jlo3n111 H' '5 Inc S 118 76 Pe76 f- 11876 8 {3,111 f t 231.52 $ 111.76 f tie 75 3 5 $ s f 5 1 66,36 .1976 237,52 1.976 366.26 69 38 • 237 52 59.30 237.52 237 62 • 59.34 1'1 14 3 17e 1. .9 17614 • $ 356 28 $ 356 28 237.52 } 237.52 118 76 .S 115.76 • f 41544 S ,49.9.17 $ Cr 03 f (74 to) 5 $ 0}6 283 $ 34500 } -107.46 S 9500 } g37s,, } s 1 550OC } e/6,13 3 354.28 5 476.04 $ 1 165 OC $ • 693.98 $ 296.90 1 4'6,86 s 1339 CC 9 .64334 S 475,04 $ 475.04 3 237.52 1 296 90 6 351,i6 1 67504 8 693 79 f • 93141 } 296 90 1 .415.416 5 267 21 6 423,46 $ 179 14 $ 237 62 $ - 237.52 1 . 237,62 $ 2$7.52 5 479.24 1 S9.30} 116,78 $ 356.28 $ 593.79 5 290.90, $ 534.41 S 179.14 $ 176,14 e 170.14 It ,19904 1 23752 6 21090 5 6138 1- .6$31 1 294.90 $ 479 04 $ 116 78 $ 11176 144.94), S ..t266.60) S 245 15 S-1299.611 $ 85 a3 3' 740.34 .1 J415.MI 1 (821 461 6 ' (237 623 6 (237 Sit $ 'e130 f 30596 1 4116 761 6 '1603.71) $ (514.49 3 950C $ ' 143:141 $ ' 72 0C S.' 0041 5 79-CC -6 •0,30' d (69.3a1 (47¢¢,04) $ 242033 43.34 59 33 0.30 11878 11,e3 1 207.63 1 26721 1 19 93 1 '29,33 5 22703 6 0402U } 25033 "(4:81) t 237,62 '1 '3111 e }.. ' 3342. 1. 36•10 30,18, 3 • 207.43 6- 267,21 3t49 . ...'176.t4 8 p7e3 119L7e . 11e.14 f )ICAO • • 1• "t 78 •296.13 1 414..6e 1+8.74 29e 90 6 ' 4t5_e6 1' 6 79 ' 298 PO f .4tt.66 • } . 118.16 6 110 76 146.46. 1 '4145 1 1C133 1 -(57.46(, • ' 207.93- $ .207,53 1 166 30 9 (1 ,63( '69.07 1 9997 S es 30 ; $ _�24.071 11176 • 178.14 4 201.90 f (294.937 59,38, '3 237.14 5 290.9C A 12([�f96y.d60} 237.42 e45}s,1 .f **Al 8' t$S4Al1 2371,12 . 3 - 143i79 56431 43 2te9 , .. 1 � ' ....Flu:. 1, , 2944 ,s:61 6 164.26 4`-'(ler.21;, • i93 $ 9SO 1 ..('4.60' '1'-C36j.761 6 _tzar -11 s s 353.00 S. (62.e61 3 '-'.CO $ (2$*) 6 .(446,601 s ee J) j50741 RIVENIg IMPACTS . " •.. �' • •' AiW J.'• Annual Ca•1'CUMnt Annwl' 16.W.St3ae Foe A6n1W Oert•F.I ttiA0 -. . Subsidy 3 - ;$ • } . 5'•, •45551 .4 12,420 -1 3.669 4 • ,.47Sr;3: , 380' } '. �651 1 9.• -•-;� •.. 1 - 1.960 1 4,650 8 3.690' f 3;371. ,9 6,155 6 4,630. $- :1,9!s.„use."'.. •se .8 :.2.173 f ._... of. 3:,-•:. 4 ,.. • f. , 1•' e0756 8- • j1a674 '6 Le.esei ...• -1' '1 • ..1 . 5 ' 9 $76 1_to1 1' 5.426 a...�:' 6 , ... $ .. 1 9, e - f ' .. 743 s; 360 3 '333) A• 8472 #.-'. 1.44e. ; - 3381 6 36t;4'1 . - 126, 4 • 370 . .6 :. ': ••. 2I •11 jj7, l': - .1s0L 6 'r: 1.4.• ••- 11$ 1 (301 1, IF, , )34?'1.,sCj0t;r• -{l3 s. - ki +r '1. '.1.583`, $ (2 741z •' 7 (6A82Z ;}j' 1'.37((6'.:' , 1,619..} ,6 .' tie') •t•.- .. ' 4...,.- 41111,-6'•• -Q261 1:. j. ,...,..........'-,•:.'„.. 6 • 6 • 6 • - 5 • 1 ' RECOMMENDED FEES Racant. Percent mended Fos Recovery Puelk uiardy Per unit RECOMMENDED REVENUE Actual Annual Coat Annual Revenue Reed Fee Annual 1.1,14 Sunatey 5 '170C S936'. 0 'e S j76C0 3992', C $ 350 03 99 921. f 237 J3 99.'8`s f 1,603 9936'. C 25 C 52 ( 76 S 85! J0 99. 97%, 3 $ 4'S00 9990% 304 1 415 00 99 84'1 3 86 $ 475 00 99 99'4 3.04 1 295 0C 99 73% 3.90 1 475.00 99 99'. 0.CI f 83' OC 99 961: 0 31 $ 4150C 99 64%. 0.6E 3 623 CC 99 9219 046 S 237 CO 99 78t'. 0 :2 1 23'.00 99 78% G 52 $ 4,5 CO 9999'. C04 ,5 1'8 CO 09381. C75 3 593 00 29.07% C 79 1 53e 33 9092a. 0 •- s 17830 999:u, 3'4 5 1,830 99929. _ J.'a $ 296 30 99 73, , 3 9C „J_ 59.00 99 38%I 3 3e 4750C 9999% 304 11300 9318R 0'e • 737 0C 29 CC 99 920. 98 6659 021 0.33 • 350 00 99 927. C 28 e 5_+ 475 S e s32 5 19 a'2 f 3 196J 3 325 683 ec 756 • r59 1 • 3!25 1 0 1 80 15 3- 5 - 3 80750 $ -E - 1 . 3 - } 3 3 99'6 3 99'5 S 5 • • 5 S_ , • $ • } - 1 $ 't3 1 '12 f e.272 1 8 365 S 5 4157 $ 41A< 1 '3 $_ 1 �r . } 5 - '1 3 356 3 354 1 2 3 • $ - f $ 28' 1 25" S C S 205 S 203 S 2 5S _ • } $ - $ $ 55 63 99,17 9 f C A6 • 207 23 29')3 298 20 • 99 92%♦ 99.e01Nl 69 70,t C2' 063 090 41500 99.94t,l 415 30 99.84c4 41530 9984s. 366 ) 38 gee +1830 953e•,' 1490( 20700 69 CC 296 00 99 70'. S_ 99 804: 3 99 92% $ 977C1. S J'e 455 0 e3 0 C7 0 90 296 CO 77 7C%. S 0 99 5900 99.34% S C38 534 03 99.92% t C 41 543 00 98.87% f C 79 5 166 03 99.4319 5 C 26 9 32 24.73 . 5 c 50 161 33 99.83% $ 0 28 9 30 94.7)'. 5 0 60 $ $• s • 3 • 6 5 - 3 - s t - $ . 3 5 • r s - 5 • f • 5 3 1 347 $ ' 245 $ 2 $ _ 374. f 3,'25 $ __ 9 $ • $ • 1 5 1 •5 . 1 12 325 3 '2 144 3 52 $ 2375 $ 239e $ -_ 3 d23 3_.._62' I_ S 1 5 t • 1 1 - S s - 1 • 1 • 1 - r.1---..__ 1 5 3_ 3 • s 3 - s s • 5 . 5 - 3 • S 3 Pa• c' 15 6 2f'OF •9 AV City of National City Building & Safety Department MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES UNIT COSTS . . . • --':'•*EVSNVE IMPACTS . • . RECOMMENDED FEES RECOMMENDED REVENUE Work Item Plan Check, Actual Cost 4s0,dIor Actual Cost T941Actw1 •Coat FY 0447-• Avvais . Currant FH •'. . 3Yr►luiJ •(Subsidy) . Per.Un6- .:,Aftteal:,; Asti Celt ....... :.'Annual; • 114963e99 Caarrentfee, ,,-Annual,: •- Gomel: Rdtd- ' ...SWAT* . Retort, n+ended Fee Percent Recovery Public Suosidy Per Un't Actual Annual Cost Annual Revenueil Rec d Fee Annual Public Subeldy 511n4111,7 ',d, R.I. 3 c6.76 .3 '16.76 3 •1e.76 3 111876)I - - v ,. 3 +19 70 99 idc. 1 0 76 <<, C,.er _ '79.14 3 296.9C 3 475,C4 r jel'Qd a . :. '.r+ :S. S 47500 9969=. J34 S - S 95i 5 • 5 95C c _ ''•< )3 Ws,. 176.14 3 295.90 S 67501 S a,;i 00 $ '(60.04) S '''pQOr f - 02 3 (tj!) $ 175 00 99 99=, C 34 _ <'.cf,5 Fare ("Au, Cass) . rp+eiarn• _ _1969C $ 296,9C S 593.79 $ .'503 79) S ..e•. }... tj. < .. • ' $ `Si 53 99 e%=• c 79 5 • 5 - t76.0 $ 2969C $ 475.01 { :4'5C4l 1 • . 31 - - 1 4753O _ 9999•. C34 5 • 3 • _ - Frt'coo.es 3 - 3 - } .. 1. .. 5. - 5 $ . 'nc 7. owe: 5r7I411, 156.76 1 296.90 3 415.6E 1 'at5,65l .9 ... -• {'. .. $ 41333 99 ta'. C 65 S - S -'d. Fr „dalcr _ f $ 1' • -•. 1'. ..-, ..:1:. ' 1 $ �. 5 $.-- •' . . -�� - --9995': Cate •r >teCc u r_ere l'�: •Of its 11678 f- 7562e. $ 47574 6'•{175.61) 6f•'-'-�' 1--- - .. ;- 0 a_ )) -� CO' _ 141414.044>+es pncren.•n+s o•'0 - - $ • 17314 -3 .1/1+4 1'{1731 t11 3' L + C '• .` -• 3 "603 2992•. C14 } - $ 0••e�ate41 p•e.ureswd concrete) 11e76 1 1156E 'l• 5344• Sr•(534111j '3 .'Sal Cr -" 1 3 5340) 9)92:. Cat $ - S • :d000nai Nes pare^,ents c• `0, •1. 237 57 } . 23732 f (237421, 13:647. ... '' 6 . a 3 73' 0) 99'6'. 0.5; $ • 1 P'►>ian Cre:•:.ppor•-enB1•rrr.oun 11176 1 .' 2969 1 .'ti34$ 3'j1/6,'{61 }: 3•• ,:a S' ,:' '} ' 1.__+46 C) 9970!. 045 $ 1 • $ $ _• - S . _ P-►>Un Cr*, Appt ,eau, etc l t'2 Hoag 59 38 . - „$ ...59 33 3 ,:1563e} �, I',q s. '1.1: . $ . ... : .•: $ 59 C) 99 36% 0 36 Remccer-Res Oenoal - -. s .. r . 3' .:. S:'S•t.71_,I'.' . - '.• i-.• 1 $ 1 • 1 _ 5CC s' Sngie Sc'll 23732 1- gela .3. <50379 $ 255 CC i '5$33,t91 '3�f..j'{5,33 I .9 WI, ..--111141en 3 593.CO C967•. 076 $ 21377 3 21345 5 29 m Aiill.onal Reciel 953 9.3 1: ' 13 3- 29 p'' t29.3j1 A. !...•.;..r •34 „ •. ?'SS• - • $ 29.00 $ 9666% ---- 033 1 5 - 3 • Re -roof • 1 '3 ... 3:., . -• r:,, :.... L _..'\i3 '..... 5 +e735 1 +e 775 -.I-- +6E%511 1 1� .er5naes_•.s150C s' • 4+Gd.-;._ }•� S.6Q, 3 • n1,66 $ 2'6.00 1•'(19Q Q61 i•=.a�+03 3..;_. 9T20 3' to Q961 $ .SOC 995P. J66 Ea:, addnlcna� +)] of S• 3- 9.50 S. . 9.50 3' - ; •{!1'Q32 n -.3...., -• , S 9 0C 54 73•. 3 SC 3 - • 1 _ - C7"pM.'l.r.r SOOsf S - 3. e'S66 -T. ''413.66 f 134.25 3�{311'6U !•'1i�11r •v S9 S. '"-(5331 5 4,SOC GS64% 366 5 fl' f30 3 _ Eacr addonra� +';) sr f• 3 •030• •S ... 9.e.0 3 - '{0 �1 ,3Ei:,-�Wi. }. •......,' $ 900 91 :1'. ).SC $ • - 3 RU15 G3,G1ure RepOpr.e,t 3 237:51 4 29e,90 i' • 53441 }:-(134.41j 1 `,'•_s•S-S/, ." r.y .1 1„ _ - •• • S :340C 99 )T- ) 41 { - 3 • 5acra702o.tei IC0 61 3 29.49 T• ' 10A0,3 • )169 1 •(44 91 t''. dsr •t ..`a ••1"i.'.•.-•. • S 450C 965e'. L )69 1 • $ _ 4.6ae,oal F►Pi,mb Oaf Pe,e 3 •59,3e .1 .• 143.45 $ .' 207,63 3 - )(247 831 4' - 1 • '' • t 7. 3 237 OC 9G 6)'n 1 3.83 } - $ Rec,,snort R►W•e Mat Paw 1 50,7E } 116 aS '11; •'.107;11"$ 7070 4.j37 131 y13•tn F •70�1-.SNei f :3%00 996)`r. 1 )83 1 208 2C% 5 icc-,.o..o._usl Story f >F 1 ... { ..'.. : t •��.. - f.'.: <'. f $ 5 - 5 'JF'o 50C a' 3 237.62 .3 ' 47501, •1- .112.55 $ 41) 30 1 •(302 V. +3: + Q.1121r,f •,_46TP °1�, •(2S3t19} $ '+2 90 - 99 52% 3 J 55 S 5812) 5 7 '33 56 3t4 7 0.5.5E S +5 5 1,7 :.dd'uora' room adll. n I0.e' SW a2 1 A.60' f, - 19. 0' $' `c26,30 1 21 03 - 1- r.•>16' '3:,.. Al �: 1\' ' TA56' -se' J ., " 27 1c S 25 ]O 96 2<�t C 50 �. yP Io 500 at •,v•k Ca' .' 3 356.21_ 3 -.' 374.41 '} .$95'3$- F' 181069) I4, `..1 :':.ids } $ !J JO70 99 G2'. ! L 59 $ 5 • Add�bdra robn addition +G •er S(O afwm Cale) s 910 _ - :2073 •. '} _ •. 3643 - '.{•: �", 3 p31.311 . •cl R• 1 i +• u• 1 -'r •.. 3 38 30 97 e51 3 C 33 5 S - S R00m Adda'dr�.',ilyl0r, S 3.. .- 3 .:.• ! al.•.+, Vn•i� . 1 ..'l ` V. 1 _ $ • $ S - 5 • 5 • $ 5 Up to 530 al 1 415 6E L...1134 41- 1' }bast' �..^{ 07j +•.}ei ; r+ate j . �} 1 'A G'• ,y'a 3 95C 30 99 95% {_ C 37 +7obonal non aa0•.o1r.er 5CC 16 5 50 7-' .10 00- 1 ':.123 50 1-• : ,130) 'j•2'�' a i-F.4 .' � 13" : • C $ 26 77 96.241. 3 0 50 3 - S • S • Up+c •.J]st(.nr )alu. 334 AI.,}. 633`7P ' 1-1 r'71 til,,N1' ��-•4 'i'3 .`• „ .,a, * • 3 . ,2t )3 9996% 3 C 1+ $ • $ 1 •70UO' 03.n act. c, toe, SOC s'. t, _a_s. 6.50 1. 29.3}'1• •!'!��� : 3663 1. ,ram 5 '3 i36 .� (3. Yi ' t_. ,t. 1' ••• • 3 se CO )785E-. 3 063 1 $ 5 Sa,�ateatr 2969 317e.14 $ '20783 , 3.'Q07 1 9' T +`113:- :•�1'S " 3 20'C) 9960•. S 083 $ $ 3 5_d,rt • . 7e 1.fe S. 176.14 1 4 ; •.. ,.• a- -• -... ' f- 3 '•e co 99 42•. S 0 tc S • S 3 ACi'ovl piing • 1• '9.13' 3 1983 _ -, 19 ( �•11 S' ' -. -.• � 1 '. L. - 3 +9.00 9560.E 5 063 f _ - 3 � 1 5.9rc .1. ... S -.... 1'. :.• i 3; .1' :'✓ 1 •- .. S - 1 1 1 • 'cle ton vr. a-erx 59 36 a 237.52 f ' 296,90 3 2 %5 0C 1 • (16 03) e ....life ''- 5561 1 • ' • j�le) $ 236 C6 S9 70•. 3 O 5C 1 594 S 792 1 2 . _ 'ale iv. Dome .59.3e 3 - • 267 21 3 326.59 • 3 153 0C 5 ' 73 59) -1. .' e53'F.Q ' 506 -5 ' .(1471 S 326 CC 55 52•. 3 0 59 3 653 1 4i2 1 _ .69,14n r)5 ti,r,7n.E.ecn•c 29.69 S-171.14. 3 '207,e3 3 32500 f .11617- 3 ":1,247' 4' - 1956' $ • 709 5 2)70C 5560•. 1 083 5 1247 5 +2c7 5 5 :•e9 E6_,c 59.3E S. 237.52 1 .296a0 f 4 )3 00 5 . '1C410 1;' S9.tl $ 21,761•1' ' 5730 3 :95.00 9973% 1 1.9C 3 +6032 3 • 3 16 c5c 3 c6 f - 1 5a712n1 29.69 "S 176.'4 f 2)7.83 d' ;207,131 3'• • ' -$ - • $ - S ))700 9963'. $ 3 e3 Spa c• ..>t -<.c F.e•'a>,icauc 29.69 $ 146.45 5 17e.14 $ ';17p 141 '1. :- -. $ : '• - • $ ' . - 1 ' 76 0C 9S 92•- 3 3 +4 $ 3 1 _ Stave-F rs1 Fpn - 29.69 9 . tag 46 s, 't93,14 3 +39 00 1 109.1a 1 ': ' Y. } .i5;•_,::f3e"4. t 2900 9685% 1 333 f of f $ Eau, ec O: onaab m .-. 9 • 9 SO }_ 1Q,6; 3 • '. '29.33 f . L39 33) k•9Y�•. 'nib S .9 1 .-. $ 79.00 96 65'o f ) ]7 3 - - F - 1 St0ra3•Raas }' - ;'.1 ' .. 'Sr ... ',-,}f. - :S 47. $ 1 3 - 1 • 5 • c+e• 6' nin.,,p tc 1)3 a) 11876 } 148 0 -} 26721 1-. (267.21) {' [',1r'••,3::-_` '1 '• 1 2t770 9952,, 3 021 S 5 • S • 63.7 1004ror.y 133 It 950 1 19 ILI 3 - •2931 1-7 (21.33 1' • • • 1. 3 $ 2)30 9886u. 3 (`33 S - S - 5 Sluccq±pp, .warts • 1 237 52' •f • '237.52' $ 243 30 3 .. • 0'48 3 1 425 $ 7,458 1 33 1 137 10 99 7e•, $ c 52 5 ' 425 $ ' 422 S . An ad•onai Stucco,, auon -.. ?Pf i $ 29.19 f .7919 3 'SC OJ 1' 120.31 3 60 ! 450 $ 361 $ 1900 976! i f C59 S !S 5 6' S MA3I1:Ci Ira( Page ' 4 31 I! 6.:6,05 . 3 3E aM City of National City Building & Safety Department MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Wort, !tam St.ruara moony P.M Sw1,m111p .0CL Sc. GunII. leatrp Plan Cooro . PWOC 1. -' _ E.cn Aao,I.cral 100 sI Commua a, 3unde Foa- op lc 500 17 _,,m.r _•al Esc', :.Oa, 'CC , •a���_: • 5' c.n3 Gi.s Don/ No. Mndc. ?Or' alr._lure •ie. ...floc. iatruc J•M] _ eaC, a1C.: On.l rlGr •1ouCi{.ral es, sac, ovl tul.l:ral ^.•ices+. OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FEES Rsasech Ipis 1.2 nocr) Slpp.mtn'a .lac 'yra, r.e SEES ea.me_ nsp.cuor coo 3 me•9.ncy' •+a'.SCnIam_l_0) C.a•Ol r.. •e.• want •ScPsSut.o' Zs-6O4t Fes E.cr .SOtara ',ow/ SUPPORT TO OTNIRDE►ARTMINTI Planr na D.p.rmer• Erp.n..nn9 O.P.nm.nl Fir. 0.pa'tmtnl QTNIR NO'$PII ACfiflTlt$ C P.Crt7.lr: a.stlPr j CI Su at :330 3,10,C mere Puc C ''four.uan Pr c sl l OFT '.1 5, nC UNtt COSTS Plan Check Actual Cost bts►.stIon Actual Coot 'Total Actual Cow- . F7,0S.0T . ' •Av.np Current F+. -219791144 : UW.Idyk. ha.UdR 9 119.70 3 t10.76 $ •t14.76 3• '(tt{;76n S .t t ' _ $ 59 36 illEMEDIEMI 3 a04 Cl S 71.C41 9 53 1311111MUMMECI $ (39,193 ______ l , 1 (Stlt.lot I 11 . ][ }. i2t,191 s • ®E;1111MIIIN s :, $ 2369 '3159 MEM .3 0ee.28t I S25-413) .}_' } (27.79i 3 7 96 $ 13 63 s 27 79 s 527.79t } .. . 3 • sr 3 • ! 1IIII - LJ $ SHi3Si niindlQnnlaill E111111:1111IF11111311FFl 3..(f)116), 3 5113•rtt}t -t• (4?w, F--.I MI ______ [ i�lE ffilI f� $ 32}r 1. Thins tR TI rummummunmen E®��I� mi 9' } } • ii1i1i1i1i1i1i1sR11111 l�ll�� } r } t rommonmos��___ E • 3 . ,REVENUE.IMPACT! .•Annly( • tMntrtl.- Y , apt .:}ubtlrly.. 1ttt A Annualc. . Annual (�11..vitue� .2375' .9 •s $ 2,023 $ } _ • 1 (3553 } } .} $ } }- 1 • t 9 • $1 } } 31 } ti t ,t 1 3 47 •t.ia Sr;.: • 1 t } E ri • SL 3 • • 3 t } Total Revenues: 3 371,144 1 203,331 3 {1,113 Par o' 15 RECOMMENDED FEES R.so.. rn.n0.d Fee Perc.nt Recovery Pupas tutudy P.r Unit S 'ISOC 9936•o $ 0JE 3 9 3 475 CC 4499% $ 0Ca 3 39 CC 395'7. $ 015 3 564.CC 99 96•. 3 0.1c $ 39.CC 945-•. 3 015 3 3 3 166 CO 9963•n $ 027 3 255 CC 9987•. 3 033 3 27.00 97 .61. 3 0 79 S 2'.CC 97 .5•. 3 079 3 - $ 3 - $ 3 } $ 59.00 49 36•. 1 0 38 3 ',el a 99 351. $ 0.6 3 'ltoc 9436•. L 076 S 3 3 c75 CC 9999•. 3 0.Ca 3 237 CC 9978•. 1 052 $ I'll 00 9936•. 1 076 J • 5 -.-1 .---- $ - 3 3 f • 3 ..1. -S- • $ } 3 s s s 1 • RECOMMENDED REVENUE Actual Annual Cast Annual Revenue ta Rea'a Fe. Annual Public Subway 175 3 :l'5 : C $ 3 S • 3 . 3 • 3 • 1 } $• 3 3 3 s • 1 • $ . -1-.--._ _ $ 1 3 • _}• i• - 1 • i_ . • . • 9 } } $ • ' 3 } • 3 9- . • } • 3 - __I__ } • } 3 I_ 3 1 3 s - - 1 Total R 171.114 t 271 414 3 450 6'2E CI '9:.1: City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS APPENDIX 2: CITY CLERK FEE SCHEDULE /00 City of National City Office of the City Clerk New Fee Schedule Fee Number Fee Name Unit •uN-IT.COSxS :• .. ..• 'Total Cost Current Fes (Su6sldy) ; ` Per Unit REVENUE IMPACTS Actual Annual COSY• CC auy,o Tape :";,upucahor CC 2_ _Cendied Ccpy Each _ _ I?er °acke' Mo" "VS Irc S39.22 532 00 S 10.56 $0 00 ib7 22) ,$1059) , )tecovered Annual . Revenue 81 General Fund Current Fee Subsidy $1.569I S1280I 5289i 'rota $4.685 1 $1,280 i ($3,375) ' of 1 "^5:C8 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS APPENDIX 3: COMMUNITY SERVICES HOURLY RATES /D 2 City of National City Community Services Department Hourly Rate Schedule Ro ition Comm Svcs Director Admin Secretary Aquatics Manager Lifeguard Neigh Council Spec Recreation Aide (PT) Recreation Ctr Supvr Recreation Leader I (PT) Recreation Leader III (PT) Recreation Specialist (PT) Recreation Superint Recreation Supervisor Senior Lifeguard Aquatics Manager (PT) Lifeguard Senior Lifeguard (PT) Burdened Hourly Rate $ 92.80 $ 34.06 $ 29.17 $ 6.80 $ 62.78 $ 13.89 $ 37.16 $ 9.43 $ 17.90 $ 12.28 $ 7681 $ 46.60 $ 20.81 $ 139.04 $ 17.28 $ 19.76 MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 1 of 1 io3 6/26/08 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS APPENDIX 4: ENGINEERING FEE SCHEDULE /D City of National City Engineering Department New Fee Schedule Fee Number I Fee Name EN 1 Record of Survev EN 2 _ 'IEncrcacnmentAgreeme.n: EN 3 Special Driveway Pe'mit EN 4 _ jEasemen: Check EN 5 _ _ Lot Line Ao)ustment EN 6 iSioewalk. Driveway,Curb Perm t EN 7 Deferral EN 5 Sewer Permit EN ; Flood Hazard Area Perm! EN 1C• Cc-structon Permit EN 1• Annual Parking District Renewal Permit EN '2 Tr� impac: Study Review. <3 000 Venicles'Day EN 13 _ Traffic Impact Study Rev.ev. >3 000 Ven.Ues/Day EN 14 Plan Copy Service EN '5 Engineering Compliance Fee _ _ EN 16 investigation _ Per Issuance EN 17 .Ut lity Company Perm t •Per Issuance EN 18 .Traffic Control Plan Check jPer Issuance Unit Per Issuance Per Issuance Per Issuance Perlssuarce Per Issuance Per Issuance UNIT -COSTS PeIssuance 1 !Per -Issuance Per Issuance Per Issuance _jPe• Issuance Per Issuance Per Issuance Per Issuance Per Issuance I• • Total Cost Current Fee Surplus! (Subsidy) Per Unit $796 85 $455 00 i$341 85) $490 05 5320 00 i$170 05) 5368 46 $139 00 IS229 461 5 796.85 5448 00 I$348 851 $1 259.89 5561 00 ($698 892 5297.96 $192.00 (_$105 961 5670.64 5441.CO _J5229 641 $381.75 `` 5192.00 15189.75' $231.931 $175.00 (526.;3; $396.38 $223.02 $35.49 ' $17.00 '51'3.3e' 5164J $3 416 68 _ $545.00 (52,870.68) $6 833.36 . $546 00 (55,287.36) $21 28 r $12 00 ($9 282 $553.21 $292.00_ 1526' 211 $17026 $15200 r$1826) $512 06 L. $258 00 ( $254 061 $476.01 $158 00 ($318 01! REVENUE IMPACTS Actual Annual Cost Recovered Annual Revenue @ General Fund Current Fee Subsidy L.: 5455 �b342) 52i. $1 920 $1 02 ) 5278i$459) _ 5448 r5349) $5.0 52,244 1 .52 7961 535.755 - 523,040 1512 ' 151 56 07 6 54 41C i$2 296r 55726 52.880 i L52 846 _ $202 1 5175 (527 S19819 511.15C I ($8,669'• 54 969 42 380 52,5e9 $17,083 $2. 37 0 j145 520,500 . 51 638 5' 3,8622 51.064 I —$600 5464) 5553 5292 1526 ) $170j, 5152 $69,640 535,088 I 1$34 552) 571 a02 1 523,700 i$47 7021 To a s: 261,901 $113,580 S150,321 tvl! ' 1US Inc. Par of '108 City of National City ,gift_ Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS APPENDIX 5: FINANCE FEE SCHEDULE City of National City Finance Department New Fee Schedule Fee Unit Number Fie Name FIN _ Tax.cab AarriniStratiCn Fee 1per Cat FIN 2 1Business License Application Fee _ Each FIN 3 Business L.cer.se Renewal Fee Each._ FIN 4 Pet LIoenseAdministration Fee perAn,mal . Surphtsl. t 'Total Cost Current Fee Per Unit 524 98 _ 6100.CO _ $75.02 $21 55 $50 00 $28 45 $10.77 _ _$50 00_ $39 23 $17 77 $0 00 ($17 77 REVENUE. IMPACTS •itscovered Annual Actual • Revenue General Fund' •Anrlua''Cost Current Fee Subsidy 51.174 54.700 53526 $14.007 515.200 _ $1 193 S39,3251 8182.500 5143._172_ $14,835, $0 .5' 4 83), N'A'''4'.US Inc Par. - Totals: 569,345 $202,400 i $133,066 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS APPENDIX 6: FIRE PREVENTION FEE SCHEDULES NEW CONSTRUCTION FEE SCHEDULE NEW CONSTRUCTION REVENUES MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE /0 B City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK FEES ONLY Cambodian Type Conshuctdom Type Construction Type 1A, 16 M. Kt, MIA, NIB. TV VA. VB IBC. Project Size Class IBC Occup flclr Type Thee ihold A • 1 _ + ssembty_Frxe.3 Sco5 • (heater. Concert (tall A.2 - .2_1ssemi y-Food & Dnnk - 1 Restaur 1.000 - 5.000 - 10 003 20.000 50.000 - 100.000 _ _ _ 1,000 :inl. �h1 Club. Dar _ _ _ _ 5.000 A-3 Assembly- • Worship. Amusement _ - A7Cade_Churth Community Hal_ A-4 - Assembly -Indoor Sport Vowing `Arena_Skabng Rmk Tennis Couit AOccupanryfenaniImprovementa _ Business --Dank _ Business -Clinic. Outpatient Bu ne55-Dry loran j 10.000 20,000 50.000 - 100,000 Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cast for @ Each @ •Each @ Each Threshold Additional Threshold Additional Threshold AddiSonal Size 100 st' Size 100 sf' Slob 100 s1' $3.714 _ $6 7025 37.878 _ 35. 5854 _ _ 32.143 34 4683 _ $3.482 _ $10 7000 $290_2 _ -38 9167 _S7 371' _ 37 1333 $4,017 310 7100 - _$3.348 _ 18 9250 $7.678 _ _$7 1400 _ 35.088 $0.8900 540 50 /41 / $3.392 _ _$0 ,933 55355 15.3500 _ --4,2$4,483 34.4583 $3.570 3J 566/ _ _ _ $8,030 58 0300 16,692 $6 6917 1• 5,353 55.3533 _ 33.857 _$80430 $3,214_ _ 362025 12.5/1 _ $5.3620 $4.178~ $128400 _$3.4878 2 3107000 _ 52.6"_ _18560_0 20 $4.820 11285_ 34.017 1101100 _ $3,214 f85660 $8.108 $1.06130 _ 15,088 30.8900 _ 5.4.070 307170 $6.426 _ SB 4200 $5,355 35.3500 _ 34784 _ 54 2802) 59.636 19 6.380 $8,030 38 0300 $6,424 $6 4240 1.000 $3.857 $8 0430 - $3.214 $6 /075 32571 $5 3620 5,000 54.178 3128400_53_482 f10.7_00 0_ 1_2.786 f8561:1, 10.000- $4870 _ $128520 _ $4 01/ 310 7100 33.214 - 18 568U 20,000 36.106 31 0680 _ 35 55.088 S0 8900 _ $4.070 _ SO 7120 5_ 0,000 36 426 $6.4200 _8.0 35.355 15 U0 _ $4.284 * 1 7800 100,000 39,636 39 63601- $30 $8 0300 - 36.424 $6 4240, _ - _ 1.000 $3.85/ $80430 $3.214 _ $6.7025 _$7.5/1 S53620 5 0,176 00 $4__11? 8400 _ 53.482 $10 7000 _ 52.786 $_68 8 5600 - 10 WO 34.820 $128520 34.017 $10 /100 _ $3.214 f8 0 20.000 _ _ f6 106 _ $1.068_ 0 _ 55,088 _ _SO 8900 _ 34070 _ $0.712U _ 50,000 $6,426 _$8 4200 55.355 _ 15 3500 $4_284 $4 2800 100,000 39.636~ $96360 f8.030 380300 36.424 $6-4740 400 17,507 _ $13.0620 _ S7,089 5108850 _ 51.671 $871180 2.000 32, / 16 $20.8800 $2__ 263- $17 4000 - S 1 811 $13.9200 -_ _ 4.000 53.133 320 9040 32.611 - 117 4200 f2.089_ _ f 13 9360 8000 $3.970 317400 33,308 314500 _ $2.646i _ 511600 20.000 $4.178 310.4520 �_ f3,482 SO 7100 32.786 $8 9680 40.000 36.269 515.6720 $5,224 313.0600 54.179 $104480 _- _ 00 100 32507 152 7300 S2.089 f43 5250 $1 671 $34 8200 _ 5_ $2.716 $83. 5560 _ f_2263 _ 3696300 _ 31.811 $55 7040 1.000 - S3_134 $83.5560 12 611 $69.63W - - S7./189 S55 704U 2 000 $3 969 - $6.9760 $3_ ,308 _ $5.8133 $7 B46 - _ _ $4.6507 5.000 $4.178 $41 /840 $3,482 534.8200 52.786 5778560 10.000 $6.268 362 6760 55.2_ 23 S57 23� 54. 178 - 341 /(idle 100 $2.700 356.25007 5? 750 _$468750 - SI800 _337 5000 500 32 975 S89 9880 $2.431 _ $74 9900 $1.950 359 9920 1 000 $3,375 390 0000 $2,812 _^ _ S 75 0000 $2.250 *60 0000 - -2 000 $4,275 $7 4920 f3.562 SG 2433 $2.850 14 9947 5_000 _ _f4_ _ 0J0 .499 $44.9880 _ f3,750 $37 49_ f3000 $29 9920 10,000 16./49 $67.4880� 35• 624 $56.2400 $4,499 344.9920 _ 500 $3_3/5_ S14.0625 $2.612 _ $11 7188 32250 _ 593750 2.500 $3.656 _ $72 4850 _ $3,047 318/375 32A37 314 9900 _ 5 000 ` 54.218 f22_5N0 _ - $3.515 f18.7500 $• 2.812 515 0000 10.000 _ _ 35 343 $1.8800 1• 4.453 _ 31.5867 - $3.562 31.2533 25.000 35.675 S11 2500 34,688 $9.3750 53,/50_ $7.5002 50.000 18,438 1116 8750 $7.031 314 0625 SS 625 S. 2500 Business-Prolession:4 Office Rosin sss _High Rise Othc.r - D Occupancy lcnarn Improvements MAXIMl1S Inc 1.000 53.616 37 5412 53.013 _ 36 7844 52.410 - $5 0215 _ 5.000 _ $3.917 $12 0450 33.264 $10 0375 - f2612 $8 00 03 10 00U 34 520 S220456 _ $3,766 S10.0375 $3 013 S0.0300 • 20,000 $5.774 _ SO 9950 $4 //U _50.8292 $3,816 SD_6633 50.000 $6,073 _ _ 36 0450 _ $5.019 _ `.A S5 0375 $4.015 _ $4 0:100 - 100000 $9,045 39 0450 37.538 37 75 36.030 S0.0306 5 000 *4.455 31.7150 - _ $3,712 $1.4292 - $2.970 _ $1 1433 25.000 34.798 _ y1.1100 _ $3_998i_ $3.4250 $3 198 527400 50.000 15825 $1.3700 54.854 S11417 33,883 509133 100 000 $6.510 30 46110 $5.425 w 3833 $4.340 - -250 000._ $7 200 - 306800 - $6,000 - S0-.5667 _ - u.80n 500.1100 i8.900 $1.7800 17,417 314833 55.933 SO 306/ $0.4533 Sl 1867 250 $2. 700 $22.5000 $2.250 _ $18 7500 31.800 _ $15 0000 1.250 $7 925 336.0000 $2.43/ $30 0000 S 1 950 $24 0of�10 - 2.500 $33775 335 9880 $2.812 S29 9900 _ $2.250 523 997U 5.000 S4.274 _ $3 0080 _ $3.562 $-! SOti/ - $2.650 520053 17 500 54.500 S 18 0000 _ $3.750 $15.0000_ _ S• 3 000 312.0000 25.000 , 38. 750 S27 0000 55.675 322.5000 $4, 500 SIR 0000 Page 1 0122 �0t1 67lti108 - 10.01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK FEES ONLY Construction Type IA, IB Construction Type Construction Type RA, NB, MA, MB, IV VA, VB Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Base Cost - Cost for IBC • Project She Threshold Additional Threshold Additional Threshold . AddltioiW Class . • IBC Ofcnpancy-Type Threshold Size 100 sT • SIze 100 s1 Size .. 100 if t F Educational -Group Occupancy _ 500 $4 33r1 $18 0713 S7 616 $ 1 S.059a $7.893 $12 0475 • 6. person., up to the 12th Grade 2.500 _ 34 /00 $28 9200 $3.917 $24 1000 $3.134 _ _319 2800 -. I 5.000 35.423 528 935U _ $4 519 524 1125 f J 616 $19.2900 10.000 S6 870 S2.a000 55.725 52 0000 f4.580 51.6000 • 25.000 $7230 $14 4600 $6,025 _ 512 0500 5.4 R20 j26400 50 000 310.845 $21 6900 $9,038 $18.0750 3 /.230 f 149 4800 E e8uca1r0n1l- Day Care 300 14 098 $26 4588 $3415 $23.7156 $2,732 318 9725 - 5• children. older than 7 10 yrs 1.500 54.439 145 54UU $y699 537 9500 52.960 530.3600 3.000 55.122 545.5250 54.269 337 9375 33.415 $30 3500 6 0W 38 a88 5.3 7650 55407 53.1542 Sn 375 f2 5233 15.000 $6.829 322 7850 f5.691 118.9675 $4,553 _ 315 1900 _ 30.OW 310.247 _ $34 1550 58,539 j28 46?5 $6.831 122 7700 F t Factory Industrial Moderate hazard 1.500 $3. 131 54.0230 32.611 33 3525 _ _ $7 089 $2 6620 7.500 $3.375 $9 6480 $2,813 S8.0400 37.750 $6 4320 15.000 $4.099 f37040 f3,416 52.6700 f2.732 f71360 30 000 54 579 51.06 0 f�816 50 Bt187 53.053 30 7093 _ IS.000 $5058 31.6080 54.215 5.1 3400 _ 53372 _ 11 0720 150,000 Sfi 264 34 1760 f5.220 S3 4800 14 1 /6 52 7840 r•2 Factory Industrial •I ow Hazard 2.000 $ ,(rie $4 2600 _ f3 415� SJ 5500 S2 7J1 $2 84U0 10.000 54,43939 56 8250 $3 6 55 6875 f2.959 51 5500 70,000 55.121 $6 8250 34.268 _ SS fib/S $3 414 54.5500 40,000 _ 56.486 _ f0 `+650 SS 405 30.4708 S4.:t7< 50 3767 100.000 $6,825 S34US0 f5688 f2.8375 f4550 $277W 70f1,000 f10.230 55.1150 38.525 347675 $6.820 S341W High _ 600 33.375 111 7150 f2.812 39.7U25 37.750 f7.8100 Pose a detonation nai,ud 3.000 f 3 65G 318 1400 f3.047 $15.6167 12,437 $17 4933 6.000 54.218 318 7600 33 515 315 6333 12.812 512.506i 17 0000 $5.344 51.5633 34 453 S1 3078 $3.562 11 0422 _ - 30.000 $5.625 39 3700 $4.688 5.7 8083 33 /50 56.2467 60.000 58.436 5.14 OGW 57.030 111.7167 35.624 39 3733 H 3H,ph Hazard Group H-3 600 54.821 516.7438 $4.01 / $13 9531 53.214 $t t.1625 • i Rc.rdly sw upputt rnbusbon 3.000 - 55.223 526.7900 34.352 $22 3250 _ 33 482 517. 8600 6.000 56,076 $26 7900 35.022 $22.3250 54.018 $1/ 8600 12.000 57.634 522400 56367 51.8667 $ 5.089 114933 30.000 38,037 $13 3800 $G 698 511 1500 55.358 58.9200 60,000 $12051 520.0850 $10.049 _ 516 /375 58034 $13.39200 I1.4 High Hazard Group H-4 300 13.6644 $75 4430 $3 053 $21 2025 52.443 316 9620 - Pose health hazards 1,500 $3.969 S40 7160 $3.308 $33 9300 $2.646 527 1440 3 000 34,580 340.7040 13.817 5.33 9200 _ f 3.053 5.27 1360 6.000 5.5,801 SJ.3840 $4,834 $787W $3.867 $2 2560 15,000 56, 106 $70 3520 55.088 516 9600 54.070 j 13 5680 30.000 59.158 530 5280 57 632 $25 4400 56.106 $70 3520 KS ,_tgh Hazard Group H-5 1.000 51.212 56.8410 __ 33 535 57.3675 - 52.828 SS 894_0 - Se-micondudv Fabrication. R&D 5000 f4,506 S1a 1360 $3.830 $11 7800 53.064 59.1240 - 10,0W 35303 5141480 $4419 $11.79W 53,535_ 594J20 20.000 56.718 $t 1680 55.598 f0 9733 $4,478 $0 778/ __ . 50.000 f7.068 $7 0800 _ $S.M9U $5 9000 54.712 $4 7200 •100.000 310.608 $10.6060 38.84U 388400 f7.072 57.0720 1.1 Inshtutao.1l-1 /. pei sots. ambulatory 1.000 34 050 58 4420 f 3.375 _ $7 U350 _ $7.700 $ 5 6280 . __ _ _ - 5.000 $4 3877 313 4880 53.656 311 24W $7 925 SR 9920 10,000 55.062 5.135120 54.218 $11.260053.374 193080 1-2 _ . 70.000 56.413 31 1240 $5 344 $0 9367 5.4.275 SO 7493 _ - SO 56.750 $6.7560 $S 625 55 6300 54.500 14 5040 100.000 $10 128 $10 1280 58 440 58 4400 $8./52 $6 7520 Ins1tutrona1 -(i• persons. iron ambulatory 1.000 _ $5 303 $11 0513 $4.419 $9.2094 f3 535 $7 3675 _ 5.000 35.745 51 / 6700 _ 34.788 $14 7250 $3.830 _ 311 /800 10.000 56.629 5.176850 $5.524 $14 7375 $4419 $11 7900 70 U00 58.397 51 4600 56.99 S 1216 / $5.598 50 9733 _ __ _ 50.OW 18 835 _ $8 8500 57.363 $7 3750 S5.890 $S 9000 100.000 $13 260 f 13 2600 $11 050 511.0500 _ _ 58.840 18 8400 M. c,' tile --Department & Drug Store - _ 1 000 $3.471 $7 2300 _ $7 89:1 - $6 0250 - $2.314 $4 8200 _ _- 5000 33760 51158W 53134 596500 __ $2507 5.77200 10.000 $4 339 $11 5680 $3 616 $9 6400 $7 893 $7 7120 20,000 f5 496 $0 9600 $4 580 SO 0000 53.664 _ Su Hahn _ 50.000 55.784 35 7840 $4.820 54 8200 5.3.856 33 8560 100,0( 58.676 $8.6760 $7.230 3/ 7300 35 /84 $5 7840 MAXIMUS. Inc (rage 2 of 22 / 6/26/08 10 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK FEES ONLY eomdecnon'type Kin ceattaructiee type {A, NB, rA. IIIB. IV Constniction Type VA, VB IBC Gast, . .. IOccupancy Type. BC Stine Ba a Cad to • TIWU 1 Ill8 :. '. Skte - '.' Cost ter -t00sr'•.• • .BUM Cost. 0 3h!isl4old Si0!' Cost for c-.0t 1ad.'•at.•• Base Cost @ Thieslrold Size Co,t for Each Additional 100d' ProMct Th}ssh0h$ M Mercantile---tiarket OIN N O UIOVNI §I§ § § §1§ § 8I§i§1§Io 52,700 S11 2500 52.250 $9.3750 -- 51.800 S75000 -- - 82.925 $17.9880 82437 8149900 $1.950 $11.9920 - - -" S3.374 818.0000--"82.812 $15 0000 $2.250 $12 0000 84.274 515040 83.562 81.2533 $2.850 51002/ $3 000 000 56 0 - - _ $4.500 $9 0000 $3.750 87 5000 - - - - -" - $6,750 $13.5000 85.625 $11 2500 54.500 $9.0000 M MercanWle-Motorhtef4tspensing $7.893 $60.2587 __$2.410 1502156 $1.928 $40 1725 $3.134 1964050 SZy11 $80 3375 82069 $64.2700 - - $3,616 S98 4700 $3.013 $80.3500 12.410 564 2800 -" _ - -- --- - $4 580 $8.0400 $3.817 $6 7000 $3.053 15.3600 - - - - - - - $4 8821 248.2100 $4.018 140. 1750 53.214 832.1400 - - -- _ 17.232 $72.3150 16,026 5602625 84,821 $48.2100 M M Occupancy Tenant Improvements 500 $2,410 8100538 $2,009 $8.3781 $/,607 58 707S _ 2.500 $2612 $160500 $2.176 813.3750 $1.741 210 7000 -- - - 5.000 $3013 $16.0650 $2.511 $13 3875 17009 $10.7100 - - - - ty000 __ 53,816 11.3350 $3,180 21 1125 82.544 $0.8900 " - " 25.000 $4.016 $8 0750 13.347 16.6875 $2.678 $5 3500 - - - - - 50.000 $6.023 $12 0450 $5.019 $10.0375 54,015 58 0300 R-1 Resedent-Transtel it 1.000 S3664 $7.6290 $3.053 $835/5 $2443 $5.0860 - Ooardnt g Hots Hotels Motels 5 000 13.969 $12 2280 $3.308 $10 1900 $2.646 $8.1520 " _ . 10000 84,580 $122040 53817 S10.1700 $3.054 86.1360 -- 20.000 85.801 110740 84.834 80.8533 83.86/ $06877 -- _ 50 000 $5 0800 _ 84 0/2 - - - $8 108 $6.0960 $5.0 _ 90 $4.0640 -- -- - -- • 100.000 _ $9,156 $9.1560 57,630 $7.6300 $6.104 581040 R-7 - -- • Residential -Permanent. 2r Dwellings _ 1.000 $3.278 568310 $2.732 $5.6925 S9 1100 $2185 $4 5540 Apartment. Dormitory. Timeshare 5.000 $3.551 $10 9320 82,960 _ $7.368 57.2880 i - _• _ 10.000 $4098 810.9320 83.415 $9 1100 52.732 $72880 -- - 70 000 55.191 $0.9160 _ $4.326 $0.7633 $3 461 10 810/ - - 50.000 $5.466 55 4600 $4.555 5.4.5500 _ $3 64-4- $3 6400 - 100.000 $8,196 S8.1960 16,830 $68300 $5,464 $5.4640 R-2 Restdemw4-Permanent 2.. Repeat 1.000 S3.278 $6.6310 _ $2,737 15 6925 $2.185 84 5540 • Apa.tment. Uomutory. Timeshare 5.000 $3.551 $10 9320 _V 960 $9 1100 $2.368 _ S/ 2880 _ _ 10.000 $4.098 $10 9370 $3.415 $9._1100 _$7. /37 87.7680 -.. - _ _ _ - _ 20,000 55.191 $0 9160 $4.326 $4,555 - $0 7633 $45500 _ $3.461 S0 6107 $3.6400 50.000 85.466 $54600 _ 53.644 - - -- - - 100.000 $8.196 $8.1960 88,830 26.8300 55.464 15 4640 R.3 Dwellings -Custom 1 tomes 1.500 $3.013 $0.0150 $2.511 $0.0125 $2 009 $0 0100 _ _ 2500 $3.013 $40 1650 $2511 $33 4 /08 $2.009 S26.7767 - - 4.000 13.616 130.1650 $3.013 _ $25 1375 - 22.410 $20.1100 - - - 5.000 23.917 845.1650 13.264 $37.6375 22,612 530.1100 - 7,000 14.821 830. 165n $4.017 $25.1375 _ $3.214 $20 1100 10,000 $5.728 $57 2550 $4,771 $47.7125 $3,81 / $36.1700 R.3 Dwe18ngs-Produchun Phase_ 1.500 $3 766 S0 0225 $3.139 $0 0188 - $2.511 $0.0150 • - _ of Master Plan (repeats) 2 500 S3.767 $50.2200 _ _ _ $3.139 $3.767 $41 8500 $2.511 83.013 $33 4800 "-- $4,520 837 8200 831 3500 875 0800 - _4.000 5 000 $4.898 $56 49/5 - $4,080 547 0813 - S3 7764 837.6650 '"- - - - - - - 7.000 26.076 $37 6850 55.022 _ _$31 4042 $4,017 $25.1233. - - - - - - 10.000 57,157 171 5650 $5.964 159 6375 84.771 847.7100 R-3 Dwellings -Allen late M.neu.Hs __ - - 1_500 S3,766 $0.0225_ $3.139 53.139 _ SO 0188 $2. 511 $2.511 500150 7.500 83.767 $50.2200 $41.8500 133.4800 - -- - - -" n 000 _ 14.520 $37 6200 $3.767 $31.3500 $3 013 _ $25 0800 - -- - - - 5.000 896 $56 4975 _ _ $4.080 _ _ 547 0813_ $3.264 $37.6650 -" - - _-_- 7.000 _$4 $6,026 237.6850 15.022 4042 $4.017 $25 1233 - - - - " - - - 10.000 $7.157 $71 5650 85 964 _531. $59.6375 $ 4,771 $47. 7100 R-4 Resrdenhal- Assisted tmng (C. 16 persons) 1.000 $3 857 $8 0430 13214 $6.7025 $2.571 $5.3620 000 14.178 812 8400 13.482 S 10.7000 - $2, 786 16.5600 - ' - - - - - _5 -_ 10.000 1.4 .820 $12 8520 $4.017 _ $10 7100 $3,214 S8_5680_ - -- - 20.000 86 106 81.0680 55.0888 50900 8 54.070 $0 /1'20 - - 50.000 $6.426 56 40 20 S5 355 25 3500 54.284 84.21300 -- - - - 100 000 _ _ 89.636 S9. 6360 _ $8,030 58.0300 56.424 _ 164240 S • 1 Storage -Moderate Hazard _ - 1.000 5.000 $2 737 57.960 $56925' 80.1100 $2.277 82.466 _ 54 /438 _ 8/ 5917 _. SI 821 S1.973 $3 7950 _ S60/333 - - - - - - - - 10.000 $3 415 $9.1100 57.846 $227 / _ $6.0733 _ - - - " - " - 20 000 S3 005 _17.5917 80.6361 57 884 S0. 5089 14 326 50.7633^ - - ' - - - _ 50 000 14.555 $4 5500� S3 791 _ T _ _ 13037 _ $3 0333 - - - - - _ _ S6 8300 _$3.796 55.692 $5 6917 $4.553 $4 5534% _ 100.000 86 830 MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 3 of 22 /( tiR670R 0 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK FEES ONLY 'class• S-1 Construction Type IA,113 Construction Type Construction Type UA,1B.11tA. INB, IV VA, VB Bess Cost Cost tor Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for • .- Each' •@. Each @ • • Each • tlltSize :Tliiestiold Actdklonal Thrysloid AdtAbdnal Threshold Addition"! Nib Occypangi Type - . Threshold Siie • 100 it t -. . Size - '100 st t . Size 100 st • Storage -Moderate Hazard. Repair Garage _ 500 _ 52410 $10.0400 52.009 $8.3667 31.607 16 6933 Motor Vehicles (not flgh Hazard) _ _ _ 2,500 52,611 S16 0700 $2.176 S13 3917 $1.741 $10 7133_ 5.000 _ _ 53.013 516 0800 $2.511 113 4000 _ _ 12009 $10 7200 - 10.000 33.817 1.1.3367 33.181 SI 1139 1.2 545 _ 1.0 8911 25.000 $4.018 $8.0300 $3.348 1.6 6911 32.678 $5.3533 50,000 16.025 112 0500 $.5,021- 310.0417 S4,017 1.8 0333 Storage --low Ilazard 1.000 12.507 $52170 $2.089 $4.3475 $1,871 $34780 - _ 5.000 $2./16 18.3520 52263 569600 _ S1.610 S5.5680 _ 10 000 $3.133 $8.3640 _ _ 52 811 26 9/00 _ 1.2.089 1.5 5760 20000 $3.970 10 6880 $3.308 $0.5733 1.2 646 SO 458 / - _ 50.000 $4.176 34 1760 1.3.480 33 4800 12 784 52 /840 100.000 36,254 36 2640- 15.220 15 2200 $41 %0 $4.1760 Storage - low Hazard. Parking Garages 1.000 $2410 $5.0275 $2 009 S4 1896 $1.607 S3.3517 Open or Enclosed _ _ _ 5 000 52.612 $8 0300 $2.176 $6.6917 31.741 _ 35 3533 10,000 33.013 38_0300 12.511 36.6917 1.2 009 55 3533 20.000 $3.816 $0.6633 53.180 50 5528 $2 544 1.0 4422 50,000 34.015 $4.0300 _ 53.346 S3 3583 12 677 1.2 6867 100,000 56,030 36 0300 55,025 35 0250 $4.020 34 020(1 Other Tenant Improvements _ 600 32.410 58 3700 $2.009 $6.9750 _ 31,607 S5 5800 3.000 1.2611 1.133950 $2,176 111.1625 S17441 _S_89300 6 000 $3.013 $13.3800 52.511 _ $11 1500 $2.009 1.8 9200 -- - - • 12,000 $3.816 11.1250 •_ $3.180 1.0 9375 1.2,544 50.7500 - 30.000 $4.019 36 7050 33.349 15 5875 37 6/9 _ N 4700 - 60.000 36,030 $100500 35.025 58 3/511_ $4.020 $6 7000 S-2 S-2 SHELL BUILDINGS B Shell Bldg Business-Pro(essionalOffice Other Shell Budding 1,000 5.000 10.000 20.000 50.000 100,000 1 000 5000 10.000 20 000 50.000 100.000 32 /00 _ 55. 6190 32 924 $9.0000 53,374 19 0000 $4 274 SO 7520 S4 500 $4.4880 $6,744 16.7440 33.616 375412 $3.91/ $120450 54.520 $12 0450 35.724 S0.9950 36.023 $8 0450 59,045 S9 0450 $2.250 $4 6825 $2437 37,5000 52.812 $7 5000 $3,562 S0 6267 53.750 53 7400 $S 620 15 0200 S3 013 $6.2844 $3.264 510.0375 33.766 3100375 $4 770 SO 8292 $5.019 35.0375 57.538 37.5375 51 1100 $t 950 S2 250 $2 850 $31.3,000 34 496 52410 32,612 33.013 $3.816 S4,015 56 030 13.7460 $6.0000 $6.0000 $0 5013 $2.9920 34.4960 550275 $8 0300 _ $8 0300 SO 6633 $4 0300 16 0300 Each ald t. m.,I IOU square feetor portion thereo . up 10 the next highest prnlect size threshold MAXIMUS. Inc Page 4 ot 22 6/26/08 - 10 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees INSPECTION FEES ONLY Construction Type • In. IB Construction Type BO I. RA. PB: IN CoMtnec ion Type VA, VB Base Lost ' Co fGf ' ' Base Cast C<ift fcr. 'Base Coat Cbsf for IBC Class BC Occuparicy.Tip, PraiseSize Tlljeslpid 'AddNi iWai . tiroetljfld Ageteihaj T� � o d Thdshoid • St S t00 ati'` 1 . Sib! ... ` tarsi'. 5�c •.t tt •. A-1 • Assemdy-Faed Seabrl� - .- Theater Concert _ 10000 $2.812 -50.0050 f2.344 -$O.OW? 31,875 30.0033 _ _ 52817 Han ._ _ - _ -- 5.0W _ f0.0000 12,343 30.0030 _ $1,815 S00000 _. - _. - -. - _ 10.000 f2.817 $0.0000 12.343 _ 50.0000 _ 21.675 _ _ 11.0000 _ - - _ . , 70 000 $2.812 • S0_0067 32.343 _ _S0 0056 51.875 _ -30 0044 - - - _ _ , __- - 50.OW _ 12.810 SO 0000 52.312 SO 0000 $1.873 SO 0000 - 100,000 12,810 12.8100 12,342 223417 _ 11.873 A-2 Assembly -Food & Donk - - Restaurarn _ _ 1,000 13,375 40.0060 - 40.0050 f1.8733 $0.0040 $0 OO - _ N.Ont Club. Bar - _ 000 $2.817 $0.0000$2_812 f0.00 _$?.250 32.250 _ f0 0000 _ - - _ 10.000 53.374 f0 0000 52.250 _ - .- $0 0000 _ f0 0006 - - - - - - - _ - _ - • 20,000 $3.374 -So. W80r _52.812 $2.812 -10.0067 52.250 -$0.0053 -- - - - - _. ._. - 50.000 _ $3,372 $0.0000 __ S2810 $0.0000 _ 322448 $0.0000 $3,372 $3.3720 A_3 100,000 $2.810 $2.8100 _ 12,248 _ 12 2480 Assembly-Worsrep. Amusement Arcade. Church, 1_000 f3 375 40.0060 $2,812 -10.0050 12.250 40 0040 • _ Comnlumty Han _ _ 5 000 _ $3,374 f0 000U 52.812 10 0000 12.250 $0.0000 _ _ - - - - _ - 10.0000 - - - - __ 10 000 20.OW _ $3,374 _ 37.812 12.812 _ $0.0000 f0.0067 550� 30.0000 30 W53 53,374 s0,0080 _ S22',�0 - -- _ _ _ _ _ _ 50.000 $3.372 S0 0000 12.810 50 0000 $2,240 $0 04100 A-4 Assem64yIndoor - 100 000 13.372 13 3720 $2.810 12 8100 12.248 _ 322480 Sport V.ewrng_ - 1 000 $3,375 -10.0060 -10.0050 $2.250 40.0040 • Arena, Skalnq Rink, Tennis Court - 5 000 _ _ $3.374 10.0000 _32.812 52 812 _ _ 12.250 SO 0000 10.000 53.374 SO 0000 52.812 _10.0000 f0 0000 12.250 _ f0 00t10 -_ _ _ -, 20.000 11374 -f0 0080 ^ 52,87? 40.006/ 37.250 30.0053 " 50,000 33.372 50.0000 _ 10.0000 52.748 $2.810 -_ SO_ 0000 13,372 33 3720 100.000 12.810 52 8100 12.248 52 2480 A _ A Occupar y lenanl Irnp uvemenls - - 400 _ 53.375 $00000 52,812 100000 32.250 $0.0000 - _ - - _ _ - 2W _o f3.375 -fO.0120 17.812 40.0100 - f1250 SO.0080 - _ - - 4000 . f3.374 SO W f2.812 10.0000 32.250 300000 - _ - . - - - . - _ - - _ - 8,000 20.000 f 3.374 SO 0000 12,812 _ $2.812 $0 0000 $2,250 300 0000 f0 0000 53,374 SO 0000 S0 0000 52.250 40,000 - S3.374- 18.4360 $2,812 37.0300 _ 12,250 B _&ainess-wank _ 100 33375 $0.0030 1?817 32.250 15.6240 S0002_0 500 33.375 SO 0000 12.812 _S0.0325 -SO 0000 12,250 _ f000W _ _ - 1.000 13,375 _ SO 0000 52.812 SO 0000 $2.250 ---$0.0000 - - _ - - _ _ _ 2 000 53.375 406080 $2.812 40.0067 37.250 40, 0053 - - _ _ _ - 5 OWT $0.000053.374 SO.00 _ $7.817 50.0000 _ 12.250 _ $O 0000 10.000 $3,374 $33.7440 12.817 528 1200 $2.250 522 4960 D Business-Ch c.Outpasent _ _ 100 S3.375 f0.0030 $2.812 S00075 f0.0020 - - - _. - _ - 500 $3.375 f0 0000 _ 52.812 30.0000 _$2.250 17 250 50.0000 - 1 Ul]il - - _ . _ . _ - _ $3 375 $0.0000_ 32.817 $0.0000 _ 12.250 _ 0000SO OO 2.000 33, 375 50.0080 32_417 40.0067 12.250 30 0053 .- _ -- _ _„ - _ 5.000 33,374 SO 0000 $2.812 30.0000 $2.250 50.0000 10,000 53.374 333 7440 $2.812 328 1200_ 52.250 522.4960 Business -Dry Clean - - _- _ 500 $4.218 $0.0038 33,515 S0.0031 12.812 $0.0025 _ - - -_ _ _. - 2500 34218 _-_50.0150 $3.515 300125 12.812 300100 - - - _ _ - _ - _ 5.000 _ Yt, 218 SO 0000 13.515 30 0000 $2,812 SO-0000 - _ - - . - 10_000 54.218 30 0050 53.515 10 0042 $2,812 SO 0033 _. -. - - .- - _._ 75.000 14.219 _SO O7'r0 13.516 40.0125 $7,813 S0.0f00 " _ - 50 000 34 215 18 4300 33.513 57.0250 _ 52.8111 _ $5.6200 R Business -Proles ,anal Once _ _ 1_000 5.0 $4 218 -30 0075 $3.515 _ _-SO 0062 12.817 -$0 0050 it - _ _ . - _ _ - - - - - _ _ • _ - W - 10.000 _ 54.218 S4 218 10 0000 *0 0000 13 515 $0 0000 52.812 12,812 30 WOO- 13.515 - S0 0000 $0.0000 " _ _ 20.000 54 218 50 0100 53,515 50 0063 _ f2 812 40.0067 50000 54.215 50.0000 13.513 $0.0000 $2.810_ 50 0000 100,000 0 54 215 54.2150 _ 53,513 53 5125 S2 810 32 8100 8 Rus ne's-Hgh Rise Of ,ce -- - 5.000 _ $3 725 $5 4750 13,104 34 5825 $2,483 13.6500 - - _ _ _ _ _ 25 000 $4 B20 30.0000 *4.017 S0 00_00 $3.213 $0.0000 . _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ 50.000 S4.820 _ SO 0000 54.017 �_ 50.0000 _ 13.213 30.0000 • -_. _ _ _- 100 WO - 34020 f0.W33 54.017 50.0028 i3.213 f0 W77 - _ _ _ -- _ - _ 250.OW 14 R75 f0.0100 $4,021_ S0 0083 $3.217 30.0067 500.000 54 BOO SO 9600 $4,000 f0 8000 _ $3.200 $0.6400 D D Occupancy Icnant Improvements _ - _ _ 250 33.375 -S0 0060 32.812 -50.0050 $2.250 30.0040 _ _ _ _ _ 1 250 53 375 10 0120 32_812 50.0100 52 750 $0 0080 -- - - - - - 7 b00 _ 53.375 S0.0120 $7.812 -$0.0100 S2.250 -SO008U - _ _ _ - _ 00U $3 374 SO 0080 1"7.812 30.0067 52.250 50 0053 - _ - _ _ - _ - 12 500 _ $3.3/5 00080 S000 _ S2,813 SO 0000 32.250 $0.0000 - 25.000 13 375 $13 5000 52.813 _ $11.2500 $2 250 $9 0000 MAXIMUS, Inc. Payc 5 ut 22 (13 6/26/08 - 10 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees INSPECTION FEES ONLY Construction Type IA, In Construction Type Construction Type ISA, JIB, IMA,10B, IV VA, VB Basra Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for -, �." Each 6. Each Q Each IBC Ptojict:$Ite Three/sold Additional Threshold AddMonal Threshold Additional Claw' . . IBC.Oceupincy Type Threshold - SiYi- - 100 if • •Siie " i60 sr • Size 100 if C EducatIonal-Group Occupancy 500 S10.244-$0.0075 58.537 -$0 0063 S6 830 -$0.0050 6. per scats. up to the 17th Grade 2.500 $10.244 SO 0000 55 537 50.0000 56.830 S0 0000 5 000 S10.244 50 0150 58.537 10.0125 SG 830 50 0100 _ 10.000 S 10.245 50.0000 S8.538 50 0000 56.830 50.0000 25.000 $10.245 $0.0000 58.538 50 0000 $6.830 50 0000 _ - 50,000 i 10.245 $20.4900 58.538 $17.0750 $8,830 513 6600 E _ Fdtrcatroni l -Day Care _ 300 $2.712 -50 0037 $2._260-50.0031 _ 51,808 S0 0025 - 5• chloren older than 2 1/2 yrs 1.500 52.712 $0 0000 32.260 _ 50.0000 51.808 SO 0000 3.000 52.712 50.0000 52.260 _ S0.0000 51.808 50.0000 6.000 52.712-$0.0050 $2.2607-S0_0042 $1.808 -S0 0033 15.000 $2.711 500150 $2.259 50.0125 _ 51.808 500100 - 30.000 52.714 $9 0450 $2.261 $7.5375 $1.809 S6 0300 F-1 Factory Industrial -Moderate Hazard _ 1.500 S8,196 $40.1670 _ S6.830 S33 4725 $5 464 $26.7780 7.500 510.606 $0.0000 58.838 So 0000 57.070 SO 0000 15.000 510,808 50 0000 $8.838 S0.0000 5 / 070 _ $0 0000 30.000 S10.606 -$0.0080 $8, 38 •50.0067 57 070 -50 0053 75.000 510 602 SO 0000 58.835 $0 0000 37.068 S0 0000 _ 150,000 4 $10 602 $7 0680 $8.835 55 8900 5 /.068 $4 7120 r-2 Factory Industrtal-1 ow Hazard 2.000 S7 231 SO 0037 $6.026 50.0031 $4.821 SO 0075 • __ ___ _ 10.000 17.232-500150 56028 •S0Ot25 S4.871-S00100 20 000 57.230 50.0000 $6.025 SO 0000 $4.820 50 0000 40,000 _ $7.730 S0.0000 56.025 50 0000 54,820 So 0000 100.000 $7,230 S0 0000 $8.025 $0.0000 S4.820 SO 00011 200.000 $7,230 $3.6150 $6 025 S3 0125 $4,820 52 4100 H - 1 High Hazard Group H-1 600 S3.817 $0.0025 53.180 50 0021 $2.544 S0 0017 - Pose a detonahun hazard --- - 3.000 $3.8174 SO 0000 $3.181 $0.0000 S2.544 _ SO 0000 6.000 S3.817 -$0 0100 S3.181 -$0.0083 $2.544 -SO 006 // 12.000 $3.816 50.0000 $3 180 50 0000 $2.544 SO 0000 30.000 $3.816 S0.0000 13.180 S0 0000 _ 52,544 50 0000 60 000 53.816 S6 3800 53.180 $5.3000 $2.544 S4 2400 H 3 600 55.725 S0.0038 547/ 1 50 0031 $3.817 50.0025 3.000 $5.725 10.0000 $4 771 _ 50 0000 S3.817 So 0000 6.000 S5 725 •S0 0150 $4,771 -So 0125 $3.817 _ -So 0100 12.000 55.724 _ S0 0000 $4,770 $0.0000 13.616 SU 1100(1 _ 30.000 $5.724 $0.0000 54,770 SO 0000 S3.816 500000 600 00 $5.724 $9.5400 S4.770 S7 11500 53 816 S6 3600 Tgn Hazard Group II-3 Re:rddy support combustion 11-4 1L9h Hazard Group H4 • Pose health hazards H 5 Hgh Hazard Group H-5 Sernrcooductor Fabncatron. R&D 300 55.785 •500030 _ $4,821 -50. 0025 $3.857-$00020 1.500 $5.785 S0 0120 $4,821 $0.0100 53.857 S0 0080 3.000 55.785 50 0000 $4.821 50 0000 53.857 S0 0000 6,000 S5.785 50 0000 S4,821 _ 50 0000 $3.857 $0.0000 15,000 - $S 785 SO 0000 $4.821 $0.0000 33 85/ 50 0000 30,000 $5,785 5192840 $4821 516.0700 53.857 $12 8560 100 $6,990-$0.0060 $5825 :30.0050 $4.660-S00040 5 000 $6.990 S0.0000 $5 875 So 0000 54.660 50.0000 10.000 $6 990 50 0120 $5.825 $0 0100 $4 860 S0.0080 20.000 $6.991 - -50 0040 _ 55.826-50.0033 S4 661 •50 0027 50000 S6.990 50 0120 SS 825 $0.0100 $4.660 S0 0080 • 100,000 $6.996 $6 9960 55.830 55 8300 $4.664 $4 6640 h 1 nsmt.tronal- t 7. parsons, ambulatory t 000 S2 169 10.0060 S 1 808 _ S0 0050 $1.446 SO 0040 .. _ - 5.000 S2i/0 S0 0000 51.808 10 0000 S 1446 S0.0000 10,000 S2.170 SO 0000 S1.808 $0.0000 51,446 SO 0000 _ 70000 S2.170 50.0080 S1.808 SO 0067 S1.446 SO 0053 50000 S2. 172 50.0000 S1.810 _ SO 0000 51.448 50.0000 100.000 S $21720 11.810 51 8100 5t 448 51 4480 12 InshIubonal-6• persons non ambulatory1 000 S2./17 S00075 $2.260 S0.0063 $t.808 S00050 _ __ _ 5.000 52.712 S00000 52.260 500000 51,808 5011000 ._ _. _ 10 000 $2,712 S0.0000 57.260 S0.0000 51.808 _ 500000 _ 211.000 52.712 50.0100 52.260 SO 0083 51.808 S0.0067 _ - 50.000 52 /15 SO 0000 $2,263 S0.0000 51.8810 SO 0000 100.000 $2.715 $7 /150 $2.263 52.2625 51.810 51 8100 Meru int.k-Dcpartment 6 Drug Store 1 000 $3.375 -$0 0060 _ S2.812 •50.0050 $2.250_ -- • S_U 0040 5 000 _ $3.374 50 0000 57.812 S0 0000 52.250 50 0000 _ - 10 000 53 374 50 0000 S2.812 50 000 - 52.250 50 0000 20.000 i3 37n 50 0080 52.812 -10 0067 52,750 S0 0053 _ 50.000 S3 372 S0 0000 ^ 52.810 50 0000 52.248 SO 0000 100 Don 53.372 S3 3720 $7,810 S7 8100 52.248 12 2480 MAX MUS. Inc. rage 6 of 22 6/26/08 10 01 AM / / City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees INSPECTION FEES ONLY Construction Type • ' IA, IB l Coos uc on Type /A. r"..trl, AB, I V Construction Type VA, VB Base Cost Cost tor' • Belie Coe* ' 'Cost Pot Base Cost Cost for ''Bhp•• Fach.. `' Each Addirionatr " Pr.000t Stiff , TWSuhoW �sf• 1ryi! 81d Class . ; . •• , 450 o4eaiciiki typi Thnditiolit "git`e Stst► 1 tit TMIS los st • M MercanUir-Market 500 $3 375 $0 0030 $2.812 SO 0025 22.250 S0 0020 22W $3.375 -$0_0170 $$2.812 -300100 02250 -SO 0080 - - 5.000 _ _ $3.374 30.00070/ $2.812 30 0000 52,•250 _ 10 0000 • - 10.000 23.374 50.0040 22.812 30.0033 12,250 20.0027 - 25.000 $3 375 40.0120 22.813 40.0100 $2,250 40 0080 _ 50.000 S3.372 $8. 7440 52.810 05 6200 $2,248 04 4960 M Mercantrle- Motor fuel -dispensing 100 32 712 $0 0075 52,260 SO 0063 $1,808 S0 0050 - -------- - 500 $2.712 40.0150 $2,260 40.0125 _ 21.808 300100 - - 1.000 $2.712 80.0000 $2.260 30.0000 11,609 30.0000 - - 2.000 12.712 500100 52.280 30.0083 $1,806 $0.0067 5 000 $2.712 $0.0000 $2,260 20 0000 $1,808 30 0000 - - 10.000 $2.712 $27.1200 $2.260 $226000 11 808 $18 0800 M M Occupancy Tenant Improvements 500 $5.725 40.0037 $4,771 40.0031 $3,817 40.0025 2.500 $5.725 50 0000 $4.771 30 0000 $3,817 30.0000 5,000 $5 / 25 S0 0150 S4,271 So 0175 33 817 $0 0100 - - 10.000 25.726 $0.0050 $4,771 10.0042 _ _ $3,817 SO 0033 • - 25.000 $5.726 40.0150 34.772 40.0125 33.818 30.0100 - 50.000 $5,723 811 4450 $4,769 $9.5375 13,815 17 6300 R • 1 Rcsrdcrlt414- I ransrrrn 1,000 $2,169 $0 0060 $1,808 S0 0050 $1.446 $0 0040 _ Boa d nq Houses Hotels. Motels 5 000 $2.170 SO 0000 $1.806 S0 0000 31 440 _ _ SO 0000 _ - _ - 10.000 32.170 30.0000 $1,808 $0.0000 01.446 50.0000 - - 20.000 $2.170 $0.0080 $1,808 $0.0067 11 4t6 00.0053 50000 22,172 $0.000o Si,4411_ _ . ii 0000 - - • • 300000 51.810 - _ - _ - _ 100,000 $2,172 32.1720 $1,810 $1.8100 11,448 $1.4480 R-2 Residential -Permanent 2. D.+e8ings 1.000 $2.169 $0.0060 $1,808 $0.0050 $1!46 $0.0040 - Apartment Dormitory, Timeshare 5.000 $2.170 $0.0000 _ $1,808 SO 0000 $1.446 $00000 10 WO $2 170 50 0000 11 806 $0 0000 21.446 _ 30 0000 20,000 _ 52.170 $0.0080 $1,808 30.0067 11,440 30 0053 - - 50,000 22.172 20.0030 01810 50.0000 $1.448 $0.0000 100000 57,172 $2 1720 3.1810 S16100 $1,448 014480 R-2 d I4esenttal-Permanent. 2. Repeat 1.000 $ 169 S00060 $1808 SO 0050 $1,446 30.0040 - Apartment. Dormitory. Timeshare 5,000 12.170 _ 30.0000 $1,808 $0.0000 $1.446 $0.0000 - - 10,000 52.170 SO 0000 21,808 SO 0000 $1.446 30 0000 - 20,000 27.1/0 SO 0080 318013--- SO 0067 $1.446 300053 ------ 50,000 $7.172 SD 0000 $1,810 S00000 01.448 30.0000 - _ 100.000 12172 221720 11,810 s1.8100 51.448 51.4480 R-3 Dwetings-Custom Homes 1.500 12.712 S 150.6675\_ $2,260 $125 5583 s l 808 2100 4450 - 2.500 _ _ 14,218 40.0250 2335515 40 0208 S2.812 40 016/ _ _ 4.000 34 218 30.0000 23,515 _ S0 0000 $2_812,_ 90.0000 - - 5 000 $4.218 40.0075 $3,515 40.0063 22.812 30.0050 - - 7,000 24.218 30.0050 13.515 $0.0042 $2812 10.0033 - - 10.000 54.218 142.1800 53.515 535. 1500 22.812 $28 1200 R-3 Dwellrgs-Production Phase 1.500 51.743 $96.8325 S1 453 $80 6938 ►1,162 $64 5550 • of Master Plao (repeats) 2,500 S2.712 S00250 $1.260 10.0208 $1.808 $0.0167 - 4.000 32.712 $0.0000 $2,260 10.0000 $1.808 $0.0000 _ 22.712 80.0075 $2,260 SO 0063 21.808 10 0050 _ - - 5.000 - 7.000 $2.712 -SO 0050 - $2.760 30 0042 $1 808 SO 0033 10.000 37. / 12 227 1200 12,260 022 6000 $1,808 $18 0800 R 3 Uwelhrlg_s• -Alternate Mate ails 1 500 21.743 $96 8325 $1.453 $80 6938 $1.162 $64 5550 2 500 $2.712 50.0250 $2.260 $0.0208 $1,808 $0.0167 - - 4,000 _ $2 712 $0.0000 52.260 00 0000 51.808 10 0000 - - 5.000 $2.712 3000/5 22,760 SO 0063 31808 Su 0050 7.000 82 717 -30 0050 $7.760 -$0 0042 $1.808 40.0033 10.000 32 712 227 1200 52,260 $22.6000 01,808 $18.0800 Ra Residenhal-Assisted lung (6-16 persons) 1.000 $2.169 $0.0060 $1.608 10.0050 _ 31,446 So 0040 - - _ 5.000 22.170 $0.0000 21.808 SO 0000 $1 44 2.0 0000 - - 10.000 12.170 $0.0000 $1.808 80 0000 $1.446 SO 0000 - 20.000 22,170 8000130 31808 30000/ $1.446 $0.0053 50.000 22.172 $0.0000 21.810 10.0000 51418 _ _ 80 0000 _----- _ _ - 100.000 82.172 $2.1720 21,810 21.8100 21418 21 4480 S-1 Storage -Moderate I Iazard 1.000 $1.808 _ S0 0050 $1.507 S0 0017 11 705 SO 0033 - • 5.000 $1.808 3.0 0000 _ 2150/ 30 (1030 $1,205 10.0000 10,000_, 21.808 30 0000 31 50/ 00 0000 11.205 30 0000 70 000 21.808 SO 0067 $1.507 30.0056 11.205 10.0044 50.000 $1.810 $0.0000 $1,508 $0.0000 S1.207 SO 0000 - - - 100.000 21.810 31.8100 11.508 S1 5083 N 207 -- $1 Z067 MAXIMUS Inc Page 7f o11 2777 IL J 6/26/08 - 10 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees INSPECTION FEES ONLY Constnretion Type 1A, lB s-1 S-2 t8C orc*iiwy. ylt1 Storage -Moderate Hazard. Repair Garage Motor Vehicles (not High Hazau d) Storage --Low t lazard S-2 Storage --low Hazard Parking Garages Open or Enclosed Other Tenant Improvements SHELL BUILDINGS Construction Type Construction Type NA,118, IM, WB, V VA VB Brio Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Cosrlor -each . tg - Each . Each Protect Sze Threshold Ailditionar Threshold AdditionalThreshold Additional Threshold SW' - 100'sl'. Sire • 100 sf• Size 100 se 500 51.8013 -50.0050 $1.507 -30 0042 31.205 _ •$0.0033 2.500 51.808 S0 0100 $1.506 30 0083 31.205 S0 0067 5.000 11 808 S0 0000 $1.507 S0 0000 _ $1.205 $00000 10.000 $1.808^ • 30 0033 $1.507 -S0 0028 _ $1.205 40.0022 _ 25.000 _ $1.808 So 0100 $1.506 $0.0083 _ $1.205 _ $0.0067 50,000 $1.810 53.6200 51.508 33 0167 $1.707 $2 4133 1.000 $3.3/5 40.0060 S2.812 300050 $2.250 _ -SO 0040 0 5.00$3.374 30 0000 32.812 SO 0000 S2.250 $0.0000 10 000 $3.374 So 0000 _ $2 812 $0.0000 $2 750 $0.0000 20.000 53.374 40.0080 $2.812-10.0067 32 250 _ S0 0053 _ 50.000 S3 372 _SO 0000 $2.810 _ _ SO 0000 52.248 _ _SO 0000 100.000 33.372 $3 3720 $2.810 12 8100 12.248 S2 2480 1.000 _ $2.812-S00050 $2.344-50.0042 31.875-10.0033 5 000 37 $2.812 10.0000 343 30.0000 _ _S 1.875 _ 30 0000 10.000 _ 32.812- 50.0000 32.343`- 30 0000 _ 31.875 30 0000 20.000__$2 812 30 006 // 12.343 -3000fdi _ $1.875-30.0044 50.000 _ $2.810 30 0000 52.342 30 0000 11.8/3 SO 0000 100.000 S2.810 S28100 12.342 $2.3417 31873 318733 600 _$5 775 _ 30 0038 $4 771 _ 30 0031 S3.817 So 0025 3.000 35.725 30 0000 34.771 30 0000 _ _ 33.817 30 0000 6 000 15 725 -S00150 - $4.771-30.0125 _ 53.817 _ - -$0.0100 12.000 _ 35 724 $0.0000 54,7 /0 10.0000 33.816 30 0000 - 30.000 S5.724 30.0000 34,770 $0 0000 $3 816 30 0000 60,000 $5.724 $9 5400 $4.770 $7.9500 $3.816 $6 3600 B Shell Bldg Hus.ne .--Profess+onal Office _ 1.000 Other Shell Bulldog 5_000_ 10.000 20.000 500000 100.000 - 1.000 _ 5000 _ 10000 2y000 50.000 100.000 34.580 S0 0000 $3.817 So 0000 _ $3.053 30 0000 34.580 30.0120 _ 33.817 SO 0100 53 053 50.0080 54.580 30 0120 S3.81 / -SO 0100 $3.054 30.0080 40 0040 S3.816 -50 0033 S3 053 SO 0027 $4.578y 30 01170 _ 33.815 SO 0100 _ _ 33 052 50.0080 34.584 $4 5840 33.820 S3.8200 33.056 33 0560 55.725 300000 34`71 500000 S3.817_ 300000 35.725 $0 0150 _ S4,771 _ SO 0125 _13.817 $0 0100 _ 55,726 30 0150 _ 14.771-10.012b_ _S3._817 -S0 0100 35.724 •50.0050 _ f4.770-50.0042 _ $3 818 _S00037 $5 /23 S00150 34.769 SO0125 $3.815 SO 0100 $5.730 S5 7300 14.775 347750 33 820 S3 8200 Each adrdbonal 100 square feet. or p nt°. theret . up to the next 1 9heSt po -U sue threshold MAXIMUS. Inc Page 8 of 22 6/26/08 10 01 AM /( „ City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED Construct4w14ype 1A.16. Construction Type -IIA. 110.11A.I11p. N Construction Type VA. VB Bass Cast cost *Sr Bliss Cpst Cost ta' Bash Colt Cost fat 6 a .Each • . J . IBC f'sti!q Sire YA.._ , 7hrelldd Aa ngi TMesl101d A44616 t 411$ • tDC occupancy .,-.- pancyType• - •Thrcihoid . • Sita'. 1011"sL' .-• Site .. . i�bSt? stae -100sl-" • Al Assembly -Fixed Seating 1 000 $6.028 $6 6975 $5.022 $5 5813 17 017 $4.4650 Theater Concr•n Hall 5.000 $6,294 $10.7200 15245 $89333 $4,196 $7.1467 - _ _ _ - 10,000 56.830 510.7000 $5692 58.9167 14,553 57.1333 _ • - 20.000 $7,r000 50.9000 $8,583 50 7500 55.76/ 10 6000 - _ 50 000 38.170 55 3600 36 806 $4 4667 $5 44/ $3 5733 100,000 510 850 $10 8500 $9.042 19.0417 57,233 _ $7.2333 A-2 Assemb-Food & nnnk 1 000 $7.231 58.0370 56,026 16.6975 $4,821 55.3580 _ - Restaurant, Nght Club. Bar _ _ 5.000 _ _ _ 57.553 S12 8640 56.294 $10 7200 $5.035 $8 5760 - 10.000 58. 198 517 8400 56,830 810 7000 $5 464 58 5600 _ - 70,000 $9.480 S1 0800 57,900 S0.9000 $6,320 $0.7200 50,000 $9,804 56.4320 $8,170 55. 3600 $6.536 54.2880 - - 100,000 $13.020 113.0200, 510,850 $10.8500 $8,680 58.6800 A-3 Assemb�t -Worship. Amusement 1,000 $7,231 58.0370 36.026 568975 *4 871 5S 3580 - Arcade. Church. Community Hall 5,000 $7.553 517 8840%- 58 294 510 7200 $5.035 58 5760 10,000 58.196 $12 8400 56.830 510.7000 $5,464 58.5600 - 20.000 $9.480 51.0800 57.900 SO 9000 $6,320 $0 7200 50.000 $9.804 56.4320 58.170 _ 553600 56,536 S42880 - _ _ _ 100.000 $13 020 $13 0200 510 850 510 8500 $8,680 $8.6000 A-4 AssemblL-Irxluor Sport Viewing 1 000 $/,231 58.0370 $6,020 $6.6975 $4,821 $5.3580 • Arena, Skating H,nk Tennis Crnrrt 5 000 $7,553 512.6640 56,294 $10.7200 25.035 $8 5760 _ - 10 000 _ 58,196 512.8400 $8.630 510 7000 855 464 $8 5600 - - 20 000 59.480 S 1 0800 17.900 SO 9000 56.320 SO 7200 _ 50 000 $9.804 56.4320 58.170 55.3600 56.536 $4.2880 • 100.000 $13 020 513.0200 $10.850 $10 8500 $8,680 58 6800 A A Occupancy Tenant Improvements 400 $5.881 $13 0620 S4 901 510 8850 53 921 18 7080 - 7 000 $8.090 $20 8920 $5.075 $17.4100 $4,060 513.9280 -y 4000 56,508 $20.8920 55.424 S17.4100 54,339 $139280 8.000 57,344 51.7400 $6.120 $1 4500 $4,896 $1 1600 - - 20.000 57.553 $10 4520 38,294 S8 7100 $5.035 16 9680 40,000 19,643 524.1080 58,036 $20.0900 $6,429 516.0720 B Business-Bank 100 $5,881 552. 2330 54.901 543 5275 $3,921 $34 8220 - _ _ - 500 $6.090 $83 5560 $5,075 $69 6300, $4,060 355 7040. - -_ 1.000 1 $8.508 583 5560 35 474 $69 6300 14.339 555.7040 2 000 r $7 344 $6 9680 56.120 55.8067 $4.896 $4.6453 - - -- 5 000 57.553 L11.7840 $6.294 134.8200 55.035 $27 8560 $8.035 580 3500 - 10.000 59.642 596.4200 $8,478 364 2800 8 Business -Clinic. Outpatient 100 $6.074 S56 2380 $5.062 $46.8650 $4.050 537.4920 - _ _ _ 500 $8 799 590 0000 $5,249 $75.0000 54.200 $60.0000 t ,000 56.749 589.9760 $S 624 $74 9800 $4,500 559 9840 2.000 $7,649 $7.5120 56.374 $8 2800 55,099 15 0080 _ .. 5 000 $7.874 345.0000 $6 562 $37 5000 15250 $30.0000 - - 10000 310,124 3101 2440 58,437 $84.3700, $6,750 $67.4960 B Bus mess- 01y Cleaning S00 $7.593 S14.0002 $6,327 511.7219 55.062 $9 3775 _ 2.500 57.874 $22.5000 56,562 $18.7500 $5.250 $15 0000 5,000 $8.437 $22 4850 3/ 031 $18 73/5 $5.625 514.9900 • - 10.000 59.561 578850 $7.968 515708 56.374 _ _ S12567 - _ 25 000 59.844 i11 2350 58,203 59.3625 56.563 17 4900 _ - 50,000 512653 3253050 $10.544 521.0875 $8.435 $188/00 B Busuk•ss-Profess,unal Olt.:c 1.000 $7.834 57. 5338 56.521 $6.2781 35273 35 0225 5 000 58.135 $12.0450 56.779 $10 0~- $5424 18 0300 - - 10000 $8.738 S12.0450 _ 57,781 5100375 55,825 $8.0300 • 20.000 _ _ 59.942, S 1 0100 _ 38.285 50.84 / 7 $6.628 $0.6733 - - - 50 000 $10 245 56 0300 $8 538 $5.0250 36.830 54 0200 - 511.050 511 0500, 100.000 $13.260 513.2600 $8.840 S8 8400 Rus.ness-Hict Rise Office 5.000 58.180 57 1875 56.817 $5 9896 55,453 $4.7917 -•25.000 $9 818 54 1100 $8.015 $3.4250 _ 56.412 $2 7400 - 50 000 $10 645 51 3700 $8.871 51.1417 $7.097 SO 9133 100 000 _ $11,330 So 4633 59.442 S0.3861 87.553 _ SO 3089 250.000 512.025 SO 6900 510.021 50 5 750 $8 017 _ f0.4600 500.000 513.750 52 /500 $11,458 522917 _ $9.167 $1.8333 8 0 Occupancy Tenant Improvements 250 $6 074 $22 4940 $S 062 $18.7450 $4 050 S14 9960 - 1 250 56 299 535 9880 55.249 $29.9900 34 700 123 9920 7 ',00 _ 56.749 536.0120 55,624 130 0100 54 499 _ _ 524 0080 --- 5 000 57 649 $2.9880 $6.375 52 4900 55.100 51.9920 -- - - 12.500 57874 518.0120 58.561 5150100 _ 55.249 S120080 - 25.000 5.10 12S $40 5000 58 438 533. 7500 $6.750 $27 0000 MAXIMUS Inc Page 9 of 22 (I1 a/26108 10 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED Cbnst action IA,1B Type Consllt.pion Type Construction Type IIA, 11B, 1MA, nos, iv VA, VD Base Cost Colt IOC ' - r- - 6 Each Project Size TA whole • Additteriat Clash "'. IBC OCcupa.ipy Type Tliresliaid . •STze • _E _ Educatrunal-Group Occupancy _ _ _ _ 500 314.583 518.0825 6• persons up 10 the 121h Grade 2 500 $14 945 528.9350 Ease Cos _ , Cost for Threitlotp A4 AlionM oodt• Six* trait.: -- - - - - - - -r - -- - - - 5 000 $15.668 _ $28.9050 - - 10000_ 117,114 124100 25.0W _ 517,475 $144600 50.000 521.090 542.1800 300 16 809 82 1500 17151- 145.5400 - Educanh ona-0a�are • 5. children. older than 2 1�2 ors - - Factory Indus -alai -Moderate Huard - 3.000 _ $7.834 $45 5250 0 6.00_ 39 200 13.8050 _30,015.000 f9 544 122.7550 - 00 312.95G $43 1850 �500 511,329 544 1930 _ _ • 7,500 _ $13,981 $9.6480 1J1W _ $3.2040 - r" 30.000 $15.185 _ 611 51 0760 - 75,000 _ S15,669 Si 59 150,000 $16 866 $11.2440 F-2 _ Factory IrldustnaI-tow Hazard _ _ 2.000 $11 379 54.2600 $9 441 _ 13 5500 57.557 f2 8400 - 10000 51l6o0 - 568400 - i9.i25 _ $5.7000 -_17.780 _ 14.5600 _ 20 000_ $ 12,354 16 8400 _ $10.195 _ 55 7000 58.236 _ 54.5600 _ _ _,_ 40.000 $13722 10.55504 511.435 50.4625 _ $9.148 30 3700 _ _100.000_ 314.055 _ 53.4350 511 7t� - _f2.8625 $9 370 f2 2900 200,000 517.490 38 7450 514.575 37 2875 511.G60 r 55.8300 H• I High Hazard Group H• 1 _ _ _ _ 600 _ _f7_191 $11.7175 55.993 59 76481 $4.794 S/ 8117 _ Poseadetona1 on ltaza,d _ _ 3.000 _3/,479 $18.7400 - 56,727 S15.6161 S4.982 $124933 - _ _6.000 f8.035T S t8 7500 $6 69e- $15.6250 r _ 35_356 _ f 12.5000 _ _ _ 12.000 _ 59.160 f 1 5633 57.633 _ 51 3028 16.106 _ $1 0422 _ 30.000 39.441 _59.3700 _ $7 868 57.8083 - 56.294 56 2467 60,000 112.252~ 520.4200 S10.210' 517.0167 38.168 $13.6133 H-3 Ihgh Hazard Group H-3 _ _ _ _ _ 600_ S10.546 _ $18 7475 _ $8 788 _ $13 9563 17 030 $11.1650 _ _ • Readily sr:t pon ronrbuston _, _ _ _ 3.000 _ S10.948 $26.7900 _ $9.123 872 3250 - $7.298 317 8800 _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ 6.000 11 yi5 i 326.7750 _ 39793 522.3125 _ _ 5• 7.834 $17 8500 _ 17.000 113.358'_ 1• 2.2400 111.137 51 8687 - _$8 905 11.4933 _30.000 _ 513.761 313 3800 511.4G8 _' _311 1500 19.174 - _$8.9200 60.000 517.775 r $29 6250 $14.813 324 6875 511.850 519 7500 _ 300 19 449 $25 4370 _ _ _ $ %.874 _ $21.19751 $6.199 f 16 9580 _ _ _1500 39,754 S40 7040 58.179 _ $33.9200 $6_.503 5271360 3 000___510.365 _ 3.40 7160 38.637 _ _ 533 9300 $6.910 - 527 1440 00 . 6.0 _ 511.586 533 3840 -_ $9 655 52 8200 57.724 _ 37 2560 15.000 51189144 _ 520. 3520 _ 39.909 516.9600 57,927 3135680 30000 114.9349.8120 312. 54 3 $41.510_ 0 $• 9.962 533.2080 1.000 _ 511.233 $8 8320 19.361 _ 17.3600 57,488 _ S5 8680 5 000 _ 411 586 514.1_360 _ _ 59.655 S11 7800 _ 57.724 _59 4240 _ ; - 10.000 312793 514 1360 310.244 311 780 7 _ 58.195 f94240 70 000 S- 13. 70t'i 1• 1 1720 r 111.4271 _ SO 9767 _ 1• 9 138 50. 7813 - r 80_00a✓ _ $14.058 3/ O6B0 $11.715 $5.8906 S9 3i 2 54.7120 - 100.000 $17 592 S 17 5970 $14660 S i t 6600 _ 31_1.778 S 11.7280 _ _ 1.O_ 58.219 SB f4 4300 _ _ 55.783 S7 0250 S4.1d6371 _ fS 00006200 _ _ _ _ 5.000 _ 96 556$13.5000 _ $5 464 511 2500 W _ _ ._ 39 _ TO 0010 000 57,231 113 4880 56 026 _ 311.2400 _ $4 821 18 9920 0 58.580 _ $ 1 1700 17.150 _ S09333 55./20 _ $0 7467 50.000 58.916 $6 7440 57.430 _ _ 35 6200 35.944 _ $4 4960 100.000 517.288 512.2880 $10.240 S 10 2400 $8.192 $8 1920 _ 1.000 38015 5110550 f6.6i9 59.21?S f5,343 $73700 _ 5.000 _ S8A57 _$176700 S7 04A _ 314.7250 _ SS 638 _ 511 7600 _ - 10 000 S9.341 _ 317 6850 S7.784 $14 7375 $_6.277 $11.7900 L 20.000 _ 511.109 5• 1.4100 _ 59.258r 51 7750 37.406 - y0 9800 _ _ 50.000 311 550� 58 8500 _ 59.625 57.3750 _ 57 700 $5 9000 100000 515.975 3159750 $13.313" $13.3125 510650 3106500 Mercanlde-Department & Drug Store _ 1.0W _ 56.846 _ 1/ 2390 $5.705 58.0325 54.564 $4 8260 __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 5.W0 _ 57.135 $tt S6H0 f594G _ $98100 54.757 $7 7120 10000 $7 .14 _ S11.5680 _ 56.428 $9 GnW _ f5.142 _5/lt-t0 - •_ _70 OW $8.8/0 _ SO 9720 _ 17 397 30,8100 _ 55.914 50 6480 • _50_000 - 59 162 - 55 7720 - $763� _ 34 8100 S6,108 - 53 8480 100.000 S 12.048 512 0480 $10 040 310 0400., 18.032 $8 0320 Bax Cpst_. Cpallof @ •E4Kh @ ' gait; 'Threshold . Stze• 't 112.153 515 0688 59.722 312 0550 - $12 454 _ S24.1125 _ 59 963 519.2900 313 057 _ _ $24.0875 _ 3 510.446 319.7700 14 5,261 52.0083 $11 409 51.6067 114.56_ 312 0500 111 B50 59 6400 517mod.575 335 00 514,060_ 328 1200 8.4550 _ _ 35 875 523.7125/ _ $4,540 _ 118.9/00 15.959 _ _ 337.9500 54.767 _ $30. 3600 56.528 _ $.'i7 9375 $5.223 _ $30 3500 57.667 33.1708 $6,133 325367 _57_,_952 _118.9025 _ 36.362 515.1700 510.796 $35.9875 38,637 528.7900 19.441 _3.38 8275 $7.553 529.4620 $11.651 38 0400 $9.320 18 4320 $17.25 _ 12.67H _ 19 803 52 1360 512.654_ _SO 8967 $10123 - 507173 _ $13,058 _ _ S 13300 110.44G� _11.0640 514.055 59.3700 311,24437 4060 11-4 _ High Hazard Group H4 _ _ - Pose le:alth hazards _ 115_ - J I Sigh Hazard Groin H-5 __ • Semiconductor Fabncabon. R&D 1-1_ _ Instrtutanal-1/• Lsons. ambulatory 1-2 Inshhrtional--6• persorts non ambulatory MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 10 of 7777 `f -J frr2f,108 10 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED Construction Type IA,I8 Construction Type RA, NB, MA, IMB•IV Construction Type VA,VB IBC Class .- • • .. - - : T13C Octiriiincy Type -.• Project Size Threshild Bash Cost le - Threshold. Sire Cost for • -Eidi- Additional 100sf' BaseCost f� .- 'T iss c d .5tte Cost for Base Seit - . Thre�Mpld_ ' CQaft fot Et71 - Additional 100 si' tscf+ Additional 1OAsi ` M - - - Mercantile -Market 500 _ $6.074 $6.299 $11.2530 518 0000 55.062 $9 3775 54.050 17 5020 2.500 55 250 515 0000 54.200 512 0000 -5.000 56.749 S 17 9880 15.625 514.9900 14.500 511.9920 - 10.000 5/ 849 31 5080 56.374 51.2567 55 099 51 0053 25.000 17.875 S8.9880 56.563 37 4900 55.250 _ 5.5 9920 •- - 50.000 510.122 5.20.2440 $8435 $168700 56.748 $13.4960 M Mercantile -Motor hel-drspensnq 100 55.604 S60 2682 $4 670 $50 2219 53.736 540.1775 - - _ 500 55 845 $96 4200 54.871 580.3500 $3,897 $64 2800 _ - 1.000 $6 32/ 5.96 4050 55.273 5.80 3375 $4,218 564 2700 2 O00 SL2 58 0500 18,078 56 /083 $4,861 $5.3667 548.2100 - - - 5,000 57533 58.778 5401/50 - 55.022 532.1400 _ - - - 10.000 59.944 399.4350 58286 582.8625 56.629 $662900 M M Occupancy Tenant Improvements 500 58.135 510 0500 56.779 18.3750 55.424 58 7000 _ - 2.500 $8 336 5.16 0500 56.947 113 3750 55.558 510 7000 -- - 5.000 18.738 $16.0800 57.281 $13 4000 55 825 $10 7200 - -- ---_ 10.000 59.542 513400 17951 51.1167 56.361 _ S08_933 - - 25.000 59 743 58 0400 _ 58.119 56.7000 16 49i 15 .th00 _ _ _ - 50.000 _ 511 753 123.5050 59.794 519 5875 $7 835 S15 ti700 R 1 Residental-Transient 1,000 $5.833 57.6320 $4 881 56 3600 53.889 $5.0880 Boarding Houses. Hotels. Motels 5 000 _ _ 56.139 $12 2040 $5.116 St 0 1700 $4 092 _ Sa.1360 - _ _ - _. 10.000 56749 112 2160 15.624 $ 10.1800 54 499 58 1/40 - - - - - - - 20.000 S7y70 11.0120 56.642 10 84.13 $5.314 10 6747 _ 50 000 58,274 5.6 1080 56.895 55 0900 $5.516 $4 0720 - - 100.000 511.328 511 3280 39,440 59.4400 57652 17 5520 R-2 Residential -Permanent. 2. Dwellings 1.000 55.448 16 8340 $4,540 15.6950 53 631 $4 5560 - Apartment. Dorm Cory, Timeshare 5.000 55.721 $10.9320 $4,768 $9 1100 $3 814 57 2880 10.000 56.268 $10 9320 55.723 39 1100 54.178 57.2880 20.000 $7.361 30 9040 16 134 10 7533 $4.907 50 602 / - 50.000 57.632 55 4720 16.360 54 5600 55 088 33 6480 100 000 510.368 $1_0. 3680 $8.640 58 6400 $6.912 36.9120 H 7_ Residential -Permanent. 2•Repeat 1.000 $5.448 $6.8340 $4.540 256• • 53.632 54 5580 - . - Apartment. Dormitory. Tnnestare -- 5.000 55.721 $10 9320 $4.768 S9 1100 53.814 _ 57 2880 _ 10.000 56 268 510 9320 55.223 59 1100 $4.178 $7.2880 _ $6.134 30 /533 $4.907 -- - 50.6027 20.000 S/ 361 30.9040 -- - - . - 50 000 57.632 55,4720 58 380 14 5600 $5.088 $3.6480 100.000 _ $10.368 $10 3680 58 640 58 0400 56.912 56 9120 R-3 Dwellings -Custom Homes 1.500 55.725 5150.6600 $4.771 $125 5500 53 81 / $100 4400 _ - 2 500 _ 17.232 540.1800 56.026 533 4833 _ $4.821 126.7867 - - 4.000 17.834 5.30.1050 56.529 525.0875 55.223 _ 5200700 - --- - - 5.000 38,135 5452100 56.779 537.6750 15.424 S301400 - - 7000 59.039 5301350 57.533 $25.1125 56026 520.0900 - - -- - 10.000 39 944 199.4350 58.286 582.8825 16.6.29 566.2900 R-3 0wcii •s-Production Phase 1.500 15.510 $96.855• "$4.591 1807125 $3.673 $64.5700 _ of Master Plan (repeats) 2.500 $6478 550.2050 _ 55.398 $41.8375 54,319 _25 133 47110 - 4.000 37 231 537 6800 56 026 531.4000 $4 871 S1200 _ - _ 5.000 S7 608 _ 556 5050 36.340 547 0875 $5 077 5.37.6700 - - - - -- - 7.000 55.825 - 525.1200 $8.738 5.37 6800 57.282 531 4000 - - -- - - 10.000 19 869 598 6850 58.224 5.87 7375 36 579 165.7900 R• 3 Dwcl%ngs-Alfemate Matenals 1 500 55.510 $96.8550 54.591 - $80 7125 $3 673 _ $64 5100 - 2 500 56.478 $50 2050 55,398 541.8375 54.319 133 4/00 57.231 $31.4000 54.821 - -- 4 000 $37 6800 $6,026 525 1200 • 5 000 5/.608 556.5050 $6.340 147 0875 $5.072 $37 6700 - - -- - - --_ 7 000 _ 18.738 337 6800 57.282 5.31.4000 $5.825 $25 1200 10 000 59.869 398 6850 $8 224 $82.2375 56.579 5.65 7900 R-4 Residential -Ass sled Living 6.111persons) 1.000 56.026 58 0310 _ 55.022 16 6925 54.017 55.3540 5.000 56 347 512 8520 $5.290 5.10. 7100 _ _ 54.232 $8.5880 _ - 10.000 S6 990 SI2.8520 55.825 5.10 7100 54.660 58 5680 20 000 58.275 11 0760 56 898 10 89G7 35 517 SO 7173 $8 598 56 4200 _ _ 37.165 $S.3500 55.732 54.2800 _ 50 000 _ - - - 100.000 $11 808 S 11 6080 19,840 39 840O $ 7.872 $7.8720 S-1 Sluiage-Mal•:ratit Hazard 1.000 $4 540 55.6950 $3.783 13.973 _ SA7458 $7 5917 $7 026 53 178 13 /98/ 56 0733 _ 54 /68 59 1100 39.1100 - 5 000 _ 353 _ _ 17 5917 _$3.482 _ 73 56.03 10 000 55 223 20 000 _ _ 16 134 50.7533 _$4 5.5.112 50.6278 _ 54.089 30 5022 50.000 56.360 $4 5600 _ 55.300 53.8000 34.240 53.0400 _ - 100 000 $8.640 $8.6400 17.200 1/ 7000 55.760 $S 76-10 MNUMI IS. Inn, Page 11 of 22 11 C1 8776708 • 0 01 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention Schedule of New Construction Fees PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED Construction Type Construction Type IA, I8. • - IlAr OB; NIA, MB, IV Base Cost Cost for Base Cost Eli: .. @. ,. . - IBG Prnlect Size Thnspoid Adinige I Threyh014 :Ciais.. • .. •- , IBC Occupancy Type - • 'Threshold Size 1001f • site . S-1 Storage -Moderate Hazard. Repair Garage 500 $4 718 $10. 0475 $3,515 • Moor Vehicles (not High Hazard 2.500 SI rIt9 316.0700 33.683 5.000 $4.821 $16.0600 34.018 10.000 $5 624 $1.3400 34 687 25.000 $5.825 _ 38 0400 $4 854 50.000 37 835 $15.8700 $6,529 S-2 Storage --Low Hazard 1 000 55 881 35 2290 34.901 5.000 $6.091 $8.3640 $5.076 10.000 $6.509 18 3520 35.424 2 Construction Type VA, VB Cost for Each AddHlotul 100 st • 38 3729 513 3917 $13 3833 S1 1167 56 /000 $13 0583 20 000 37.344 10 7000 50.000 37.554 $4.1640 100.000 39.636 $9.6360 Storage -Low Hazard. Parking Garages 1.000 35.223 35 0225 Open or Enclosed _ _ _ 5 000 $5.474 $8 0300 10.000 $5.825 $8.0300 Other Tenant Improvement, SHELL BUILDINGS 20.000 $6.628 50.6733 50.000 S8 830 $4 0200 100,000 S8,840 18 8400 600 $8.135 38.3738 3.000 $8.336 6.000 $8.738 12,000 $9 542 30.000 39.743 60.000 S11.754 $13.3950 $13 3950 St 1150 $6.7050 S19 5900 $6.120 $6.295 18.030 $4.35? 34 3575 $6.0700 $6 9600 30 5833 33.4700 $8 0300 $4 1854 34,520 $6 691/ 34.854 $6.6917 35.523 $5 697 $7.387 36.779 56.947 37,787 37.952 38 119 39,795 305611 33 3500 37 3667 36 9781 S 11.1625 311 1625 Base Cost Cost for Each Th hold Additional • Size'. . 100 sf • 32.812 S6.6983 82.946 $10.7133 33.214 $10.7067 $3./49 508933 $3.883 35 3600 $5.223 $10 4467 $3,921 33.4860 $4.060 35 5760 SO 9292 35.5875 $18 3750 $4,339 34.896 $5.036 35 5680 SO4667 $2 7760 36.424 36 4240 33.482 S33483 $3.616 35 3533 $3.883 35.3533 $4,419 10 4489 $4.553 $2 680U $5.893 $5.8933 35 424 35.5825 35.558 38 9300 35 825 38 9300 36.361 30.7433 $6 495 S4 4700 37836 $13 0600 R Shelf Bldg Business -Professional Office 1.000 5.000 37.280 $7.505 10 000 20.000 50,000 100.000 37 955 $8 854 39.078 S11 328 $5.6310 19 0000 58 9880 S0 7480 34.5000 311 3280 36.066 ' $6.2M w 629 $7.378 37.565 39.440 $4 6925 $7 5000 37 4900 SO 6233 33 7500 39 4400 34.853 53 7540 rr $6 0000 $5.303$5 9920 $5.902 S0 4987 r $3 0000 $7.552 S7.5520 Other Shell ftuddu 1 000 5 000 10.000 20.000 50 000 100.000 59.341 39.642 310.245 311.451 $11 753 $14,760 $7 5375 $12 0600 $12 0600 31 0050 $6.0150 314.7600 $7.784 $8 035 $8.538 39.543 $9.794 312.300 56.2813 310.0500 $10 0500 S0 8375 35.0125 $12.3000 $6.227 $5 0250 $6 428 S8.0400 36 830 18 0400 37.634 306700 $7.835 S4 0100 $9.840 S9 8400 Each additional 100 square feet. or portion tnereol, u0 to the next highest project size threshold. MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 12 of 22 6/26/08 - 10 01 AM 12- City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class Occupancy Typo- • .,SF, Standard' t. UNITCCO$TS • ,.. : , , $ulyplur Avsnpi : �`AotutaC ; .;Curr.nf. 'Isubsl.�yl` CostsRSFpUnit Cost •Fe* Eaeh.Fw AVENUE IMPACTS 'Actual Art�luil Cost • ' -.Anwat• Annual `'Revoittih GenerarFund. CurrsntFss 3ubfldy Subtotal - Issemtiy-°-xe0 Seaur3 Theater Conce-1 HEIi 1.000 5.000 '0.030 2C 000 50.000 100 000 4.2 Asserroly-Fo3 & Jr,nk 1 300 Reslaurar•t. N Q1t Clot Bar 5 00C 1$ 30C 23.000 - ` 50.000 100.000 3 Assemt'y-Wo•snip Amusement - Arc30e Cnt.rc-, COmmjn'r. Hall 1.000 5.000 10.000 20.000 50.000 100 000 A-4 Assembly -indoor Sport v.ew np Are'1a Skat'ng Am), Tenn's Co1.1 1 000 5 000 10 000 20 30C 50.000 1 C0 00C A Occupancy TenantImoroyerlerrs 403 __ 20�3 a 000 Sus nesa-Bar< 8 000 20.000 40,030 100 500 1 C0C 2 C00 5 30C 10 00C Business-CUn,c CApat,ern 100 500 000 • y3 5.000 • • 0,000 I 8.0251 S 6.C26 5 • $ (6.026) _ 1.2588 S 6 294. 5 - $ (6.294) 0 6830 $ 6 83C 5 - 5 (8 830) 0.3950 S 7 900 5 - $ (7 930) 0.1834 S 8'7C S $ (8170) 01085 5 10 850 $ - 5 (1C 85C) 6 0261 $ 6 326 $ - 5 (8 026) 1 2588 $ 5 294 $ • 55 i 294) 0 6830 f 6.833 $ - S (5 833 1 0 3953 S 7 9C0 S - S (7,9C_L, C 1634 S 8.170 $ • S (3.1701 01085 5 '0.850 S $ .10,853; 8 028' S 6.026 $ • 5 (8.026L ' 2588 5 6.294 $ - $ (8.294) 0.8830 S 6 830 5 - $ ;6.830) 0.3(450 S 7 90C 5 - $ 7.900) _ 3.1634 $ 6170 $ - $ (8 170) 0.1085 $ 1C 850 S $ (10 850) 8.0281 $ 6 028 S S r8 026) 1.2588 S 6 294 S 5 (8 294), 0.8830 $ 6.830 f • S 03 830) 0 395C f 7.300 S - S {7 900) C 1834 S 8,170 $ - S {8.170) 0 1085 S 10 850 $ $ ;1) 850) 12 253' S 4.901 S - $ (4.901) 2 5377 $ 5.075 $ S (5.075) 1 3559 $ 5.424 5 - $ (5 424; 3.7650LS 6.120 S - S '6.120) 0 3147 5 6 294 5 $ '5 2294), _ 3.2C09 5 8 036 S - $ (8 036) 49.0124 $ 4901 $ - $ '4901) '0.1507 $ 5075 $ S (50751 5.4235 5 5 424 $ • S (5 424) 3 C599 S 6.' 2) S - 5 (8 12C. 12588 1 5294 $ 5 (6.294). $ (5,035)' _ C 8035 $ 5.035 $ - 50 8194 $ 5.082 S - f (5.062) IC 4986 S 5.249 $ - $ (5.249) 5 6244 5 5,624 $ $ ;5,624) 31871 S 6 374 S $ (6.374) 1.3124. 5 6 562 5 • S (6.582) 184371T-I 437 1 5 • S (8437) MAX- .'US. Inc. °age ,1 of 22 5 5 S S 5 $• -- $ - 5 S - $ - ' S - S • $ - 5 - Is - $ - s $ . s f• S • $ _ s s • $ $ - $ - $ - is 3 - f • $ 5 6294 $ -- _• _ S '6.294)` _ $ • $ - 5 _ 5 $ $ - S - _$ 5 _ 5 • S - S • $ (6,294) 5 • f - 5 5 $ - I S - 1 -+ $ $ - S - S - $ - $ S - $ • S $ S $ - $ - S - $ 25 377 $ f (25.377; _ $ 10 847 $ 5 (:o.t47) $ 5 $ 5 S f s 5 $ $ $ (36,224) $ $ 5 5 - $ • 5 • S - 5 $ 5 6,25;C3 - 1r^1 ;,M City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class 'Occupancy Ps. !'Sfa►ldiid 9 Bt.s.ress-Cr' Cleanmq 500 2 500 - 5.000 10000 25 000 50,030 6us.ness-Preress,oral Off :e 1 000 5 000 loom. 2C 000 50 000 100 000 B Bus ness-r 3h R se C'1,ce 5 000 25 000 5C 000 10C 00C 25C COO 50C 000 B 9 Cccupar:y Tenant improvements 25C 1 250 2 50C 5 COO 12 50C 25 000 E Edu:a or aI.3roup CCCupancy 6• persons up to the 12tn Grace 50C 2 50C 5 000 1C 00C 25 000 50 OOC E Educat,:na-Ca, Care 5- ch,ldren cede• roan 2 1.2 yrs F.1 Factor/ Inc.,s:naF_-Modera:e Hazard 300 SOC 3 30C 5 39C • 15 00C 33 000 1 500 7500 15.000 • 30 000 • '5.000 • 150,000 AWr{ps ��Clual ' CasepliESK VnitCest r•Su►iAui{ dtirry - ,(Subild)j - • fee • i Each Fes 10.1239 f 5062 $ - $ (5.0621 L 2.0998 f 5 250 S S (5.253), 1.1249 $ 5 625 $ • S (5.825) 0 6374 S 6 374 $ - 13 (6.374) 0.2825 f 8 563 5 - . f (6.563) 01887 $ 8435 $ 5 (4,435) 5.2226 3 5 223 $ • ' f (5.223), 1.0847 $ 5424 $ - , S (5.424) 0 5825 $ 5.825 3 - 3 (5.825) ' 0.3314 5 6 628 $ S (6.628) 01366 f 6.830 S $ (6.833) 0.0884 $ 8,640 S • $ (8,840) 1.6360 $ 8180 $ . $ (8.'80) 0.3847 $ 9,618 $ • L$ (9.818) 0.2129 $ 10645 f • ' $ ;13.845; 0.1133 5 11.330 S ' S (1-330; 0.0481 3 12.025 $ - $ (12,025) 0.0275 $ 13.750 S S '13.750', 20.2477 S 5.062 $ • f (5.062) 4.1995 3 5.249 $ - f (5.249) 2.2497 $ 5624 3 - 3 (5 62 1.2749 3 6.375 3 • S (8.3'S) 0 5249 $ 8 561 f - f (8.581) 0.3375 S 8.438 3 $ (8438) 19.4443 $ 9.722 $ - S (9.722) 3 9653 3 9,983 $ • 3 (9,963) 2 0891 $ 13.448 S • S (10.4461, 11409 S 11.409 S • $ ,l409,, 0 4860 3 11 650 f - $ 11,650) G 2812 $ 14 060 f f .14.063) 151322 $ 4.540 S - S (4.540) 31782 5 4,787 3 - $ (4.767) 1 7409 S 5.223 $ - $ (5.223) 10222 5 6.133 S • 3 (6.133) 0 424' S 6.362 f - 3 (6 352) 0 2879 5 8.637 $ - S (8 637) 6 2939 5 9441 f • $ (9.441) 15534 S 11.651 $ $ (11 651) 08169 S 12,254 S - f (12.254) C 4218 3 '2854 5 - f (-2.654) C 1741 3 '3058 3 - 3 03.0581 C 0937 5 '4 C55 f • f (14,055) NAXIMUS. Inc. Page 14 0.22 • .._REVEt{WE IMPACTS, • i`�' t:'•; An11ual • . r/klnuaI Actual Annip`I �f(i1/va11{Is'� Ciilti►al Fund Cost - Cafr�titrl!ss. ...Subtldy Subtotal • f $ - $ - f - 5 - 3 S - 3 . __ S S 3 - 5 - S - 5 - 5 $ • 5 f 5 223 5 - $ 5 223) 3 s 5 825 5_ 5 5 5 s e251 $ 13256 $ 5 (13256) S 6 830 $ $ '6 830) S - S - S • S (31.134) f - 3 . 3 - $ - S S • S - $ 3 f - $ f • $ f $• 5 S - f - f • S 4C 495 S 3 (4C 495) 5 5 249 5 3 ;5 249) _ . $ 16 E73 $ $ (16 873) $ 12 749 S 3 (12 749) $ 3 - 3 • f - $ f 5 (75.367) S $ - $ f - f $- $ - $ $ - f • 5 3 3 5 5 $ s - 5 • 5 - S 5 • 5 • $ •1-5 5 $ • 5 5 S• 5 - 5 - $ - 5 - S - 5 f 9 441 . S 5 (9 4411 f • rs $ - S - S 3 5 • 15 S S S - 3 - 5 - S • I f (9,441) 6'26,08 - '0 0' AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class 'Occupancy Typs •StIndtird' • '••Avers :;1A; • i.. Costpar:SF 'UnIt.Cbst TCi lit•• Sub$Tdy)- Pas •REVENUE IMPACTS i �, AnnuS.• • .:. Annual- ?etualf7tlf4uah s ;1tev.S,tui.i., 4an.ral FUnd I. " Oost;• Fel' BubslAy, . Subtotal Fac:cry -azaro 2.003 13,000 20.000 40.000 100.000 200.0C3 N.1 H.? His-, Hazarc Group H-1 Pose a ae'coahon Hazard ,go Hazard Group H-2 F eaa c.rp0or. cor-busUo' 6C0 3.000 6.000 12 000 30.000 50.000 600 3 000 6 000 12000 30 000 60 00C H-4 H.;h Hazard Group H-4 Pose health hazards 30C 1 50C 3 000 8 000000 15 000 30 000 H.gr. Hazard Grow H-5 Se•r.0'1CdCt0•rat-Icet,or FSD -1 Irati:ut oral-1?. lessons. ambulatory 1000 5.000 1 10,000 20.003 100,000 1 000 5.000 • `0.000 • I 20 000 50.000 100.000 1-2 irudubonal- e• persons nor-amb,,latory MAY''1JS, :'1:. 1,000 5.000 '0 000 20 000 50.000 100 000 3 7764 $ 7.553 $ 0 7780 5 7,78o s 04118 5 8.236 f 0 2287 $ 9.148 S 0937 5 9.370 $ 0 0583 5 11,650 s 1•.9853 S 7.191 $ - 2.4908 S 7,472 S 1.3391 S 8C35 $ 0.7633 S 6.160 $ )3147 F$ 9441 5 0.2042 $ 12 252 5 11 7174 f ' C30 5 2 4328 $ 7.298 1.3057 0.7421 0.3058 $ '834 S 8.905 S 9'74 0.1975 S '1,850 26.2471 $ 7 874 $ 5 419C $ 8 129 5 5 5 S $ 2870 f 6.637 16092 f 9.655 0 6808 $ 9,909 04'51 $ 12.453 9 3808 $ 9 361 f 1. 9310 $ 9.655 3 1 0244 $ 10.244 $ 0.5711 S t1,422 f 0 2343 S 11.715 $ 0 1488 S ' 860 S 51825 5 5,183 $ .0927 0.6026 S 5484 S S 6.026 5 3.3575 S 7,150 0.1466 f 7 430 0.1024 f 10 240 5.3432 1.1276 0.6227 0 3703 0. 154C 0.1065 5 S s $ 5343 S f 5838 i 6.227 $ 7 406 $ 770C $ 10 550 f f $ $ S $ (7.553) S (7.780) S (8.236) S (9.148) f (9.370; f (11.660) $ (7.191) $ ;7.472) S (8.035) S 19.160), 3 r9.441) S ('2252) $ ;7 030) '7 298) f (7 834) S (8 905) S r,9174) 5 ('1 850) S .7 874) S .8 129) tf (8 63711 S .9.855) S .9,909) $ ;12453, S (9.361), $ (9.655' S (10.244) $ (11422) $ 01 715) S .14,880) S 15.18_3) f ;5 484) S (6.026) $ , 150) $ '7 43C) 8 (10 240) f (5 343) $ (5 638J 3 (S 2221 5 (7 4061 • s (7 700) �S ;13550, $ f f s f S S f s s S f S f f f s f f $ $ f 5 s f S S s $ S $ 5 5 5 5 $ S - 15 $ s s - 5 5 - 5 S s $ s $ S S f - s s $ - S f S S s s - S - S S f f 5 S - 5 S 5 $ • s S 5 - $ - S - 5 S - S f f S S f f S $ S S age . t o122 6,26:03 - t ^ „+/ City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class, Occupancy Type ',Standard.] Mercart,le-7t0a•trert 6 Drug Store •I 0C3 - 5.000 •0 C30 2C 000 5C 000 1 C3 00C rs I 3,1ercantde-'•1ar'e• 500 25C] 5.000 '0 000 25 030 50 OOC ` .lercantne-Volor tue,p,scens,nq '00 503 003 2.000 5.030 10030 • Ocnaancy Tenant imcroaerents • 500 2 0 5,000 10.0C3 25,000 50.000 R.1 R e s.a enha )•-Tran s,en t 33aro.r7..0u2e5 Hotels VD•eis 1 000 5 00C 1D, 00C 23,000 50.0CD 130.000 Reswen6a)--?eRronen1 2- Dre16n05 apartment Do,mltory Lmesnare 1 000 5 000 10.000 23.000 50 OCO 100.000 A•2 RevdenOal-'ermanent 2- Repeat ADartrrent Do•mnory Trmesnare MAXIMU'S, Irt: 1.000 5 00C 10 00C 23 30C • 53.000 100,00D .t 54, rpR. aAKanl ► ' ti Aetuar' Current . $Sub lily) Cest'petr3tr tlnit•COst .' Fes.: 6acMFso; 5.7047 1.1892 0.6428 C 3898 01527 5 7635 C 10C4 5 10 040 1 D ' 239 2.0998 1249 0 6374 0 2525 C 1887 S 5 705 S S 5.948 f $ 6.428 S S 7.392 f $ 5 - I S (5 705) t 5 (5.946) • • $ (8.428) • S (7.392; S (7.635) 3 11C040) S 5062 LS - $_5062) $ 5 25C $ • S ,5 25CL, S 5 625 $ 8,374 f 6.563 $ 8435 373619 S 7 7938 S 4.2133 3.736 3 897 $ 421a S - • 5 (55251 S • $ (6.374; 3 - $ (6.563; $ $ (8 435) $ • S '3.738) 5 • $ ;3 8971 S $ (4 218) 2.4305 1.0344 0 6829 $ 4.861 5 5.022 $ 6.829 0 8470 $ 2 2230 S •. 16501 S 3.6351 $ 0.2598 S 0 1587 5,424 5,558 5 825 6 361 6 495 $ 7.535 f • 5 i4,861,' $ • S (5.022; $ $ (6.829) f S s $ (5.424) f :5.558) S 825) S S (6 361) $ - $ (5 495) $ S 17 835) 4.8811 $ 4.861 $ 1023' $ 5.116 $ C 5624 5 5.624 S 33321 S 6642 S • 3.1379 $ 6 895 S - J.0944 $ 9 440 $ (4 861; $ (5.116) $ ;5.524) S (6 642) $ (6 895) 5 19 440) 4 5397 $ 4•540 f __ $ C.9535 $ 4,768 $ • S C 5223 5 5.223 $ - $ 0 3087 0 1272 3 0864 $ 6.134 S 6 380 $ 8 640 3 • S - $ (4.540) (44 86 (5,223) $ (6 134) f (8 38C) 5 (8640) 4.5397 0 9535 C 5223 $ 4 540 $ 4.788 S 5.223 $• 5 (4 540) S $ (4 768; S - 0 3067 5 6.134 5 - 3 :272 S 6 360 5 - 3 3864 f e 64C S - f - f -T 5 • 5 $ - S '2.720 $ $ ('2.720; i':r-�;, '� , •�. t�jlEN�lE 7MVAGTS €i; L*; hn�ual -'Ap Ual r • Kctlii1,401 t , k"RWid0e32 . Gen. I•Fund: :Cost, ' ,e "ui C»et r'4e• • `Sbbsidy Subtotal S � S f 5 3 S _ S S _ _• S - S $ S $ $ $ $ 5 5 f $ $• S 5• $ $ 5 5 5 S S • S S 2C5.828 $ - $ (2C5.629; 5 23.3C0 $ - S (23.3C0', $ - $ - f 3 • 5 - $ 5 $ 5 - S t228.9281 S $ -1 $ - $ - 5 $ 61 976 S •5 '61 978) $ $ $ (74.698) $ $ 5 $ (5.223) S S S (8.134) S - $ $ '6 360) • _ 3 64C) S f J Page 16 o' 22 6'26,08 - • 0 31 AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class Occupancy Tips •Standird R-3 nes--Cus:om noes 1 50C 2 500 4000 5 000 7.000 10.000 R-3 Dv,.Thr s-P•oduct,on Pnase - of Master °ian , repeats, 500 2.500 4.000 5.000 7,300 13 000 Owe.. ng s-4Iter hate Matena,s 50C 2 500 4000 5 00C 7 000 10.000 R-1 '7es,cerua,-Assisted ng (5-16 persons: 1,000 5.000 10.003 20.000 53.000 100.003 Storage -Moderate Hazard 5 00C 10 D00 20 00C 50 00C 100 000 S•orags--41dderate Hazard. Redd jarage Motor Ven¢le4 nc' H 9)' Hazard: 500 2,500 5.030 '0 000 25.000 50,003 5.2 i Storage-uA Hazards '.003 5.000 10.300 2yC 50 000 100,30C UNITCOSTS t aurpl Awl gs ' +)ctt�al ' Currant (Subsidy). CostpS 8p.. unit Cost Hs - Eaeti fss L 2.5444 1 9284 1.3057 t .0847 s 3017If $ 4 821 5 f 5 223 3 f 5 424 $ 0,8609 3 6 026 3.6629 $ 6 829 2.4487 s 3.673 • 7275 5 4.319 1 2052 1 0144 0 8322 G 6579 2 4487 1 7275 1.2052 1.0144 0.8322 0.6579 5.0218 • .0579 0.5825 0 3448 0 1433 0.0984 4 5397 0 9535 C 5223 G 3067 0 1272 0 0884 4,821 5 072 5.825 6,579 3.673 4.319 4 821 5 072 5 825 f 8 579 f 5 022 S 5 290 S 5.625 f 6.896 f 7,185 3 9,840 $ 4,540 $ 4.788 f 5,223 3 5,134 $ 5380 f 6843 f S 5 f s f f $ • • $ (3017) $ i4821) f (5 223) f '5 424) $ (6 026) S (6.029) $ (3.673) $ (4,319) $ (4.821) S (5,072) S (5,825) S (5,579) • 5 (3.673) • i 5 (4.319) • 5 (4 621) • 3 (5 072) - f (5 6251 $ (6 579) S (S 022) S (5 290) $ (5.825) s ;6.096; f (7,165) 5 (9.840; $ - $ (4,540; $ $ (4.766) $ - f (5.223) 5 S (5.134) - 5 (8.360)1 S• 5 18 64c) 8.4386 f 4 218 f 1.7877 f 4419 S - 0.9842 $ 4 821 f • 3.5624 f 5 824 S 3. 2330 S 5 025 5 -071Iii-1 $ 7,e35 3 - 4 9012 f 4,901 t 0151 $ 5,076 05424 5 5424 0 3080 0 1259 0 0603 f 6.120 $ 8.295 S 5,030 $ $ $ S (4 218) S .4 419) S 4821), $ '5 824) $ `8251 s 7 835) $ '4,$01) $ s - f - '.13 "•'US Ir.C. Pep' '' of 22 $ (5 o7e) 3 (5.424) f (6 120) $ (6295' f (8,033; ;;, , • REVENUEIMPACTS L.; Annual Aetusl Atlnttal),;: Rayanus • Coit : 1' Currant Fss - Annual 13snsral Fund Subsidy Subtotal I $ 41.983 f 3 f S s - S S •5 S •���IIIIIIS 5 - 3 $ 202 018 $ 5 • 5 f (41 983 ,, S (41,983) .202 C18) - 3 f - $ - s S 5 f 1S • 5 f• 5 $ - f S f S S (202,018) f S $ f f f $ s f f 5 5 • $ • 3 • 5 5 20 302 f $ (2C.302) 3 $ s 5 424 f S (5 424) 8120 3 _:.�5_.._ _ (812C) - s 5 $ (31,844) City of National City Fire Department —Fire Prevention New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Class Otoupaney'ly.ps . lard S-2 S+o,a;e—Lov,'aza•c Parkmq Ga•ages Open o' Enu:seo 1 000 5 000 10.000 20.300 50.000 1c0.000 C lher Tenan• ITyoeemenIs SHELL BUILDINGS 6C0 3.000 6 CDO '2000 3C 03C 60 000 8 She 1 13l0p Buswess—.rotesmonal 0'5ce O:ner gtitll Bullomp • 300 5.003 10.003 �; .ti •TJ�►i.0 t, ketr� ttuill Ifaht'. Cost;par P, :iitCost.' ,Ria• 5 2228 5 5,223 1 0847 0 5825 5 5.424 s 5.825 0.3314 $ 6.626 0 1388 S 6 830 S - 3 (5.223) S S s S f (5 424) S (5 825) f :6 625( S 8 830) 0.0884 S 8 840 9.0392 8525 $ s 8 640, S 5 424 S - S (5 424) 5 558 S - I S (5S58, 0.9709 S 5.825 S • S (5.525) 0 5301 S 6.361 S - $ (6.36..) 02165 S 5495 S - S (6.495; 01308 S 7,838 f • S (7.836) 8.0663 S 6.056 5 - $ (8 066)1 1.2508 S 6.254 S - f (8 254) 3 6629 S 8 829 S - 3 (6 6291 20,000 0.3859 $ 7 378 S 50.000 0.1513 S 7 565 f 0 0944 $ 9.447 S 130,C00 1 000 5 000 1 C 00C 20 30C 50.000 100,003 $ i7 J78)I •S O 565) S 19,440 6 227C 3 5.227 1 2856 0 6830 c 3817 0 1567 0 0964 S 6,428 S 6.830 s 7.834 S 7.835 5 9 840 S S f S $ $ 3 (B.227) S (5.428) f (6.830) S 17.634) f 7.835) f (9 840) ;'.A'3 i d n ' f *o cat • • 'tIE 7S • nNia, . ''r. ��re�F` r;�niral6pnQ .WAY ``-Sub$Idy Subtotal - s • f $ S f $ 8,840 f 48.812 S 3t 903 S 5 f s S S 8.840) f (8,840) S (48.8,2) S (38 9031 S 5 5 S (57,714) f S f f $ f S S $ S f S f f s s Fs S $ S 5 s Total Revenus,: f 834,485.1 S MAXIMUS, InC. Page 18 0' 22 S (834,485)I S (834,415)1 6/26/08-1001Ab1 Fue Prcx:tor System City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Work Item C. --UNIT COSTS...... 1?Isn:Ch.ck InsploQen Average Aetp�I Cost Acfp)I'Cost , Cost Current Fe* ,gSubsidy-' . fftet:°firth, Stanoard Hourly Rate F,re Spnn-der System Ira rovement Less lhar 2C 000 s1 20C31-45200s1 4502'-83000sf 62 CC- - 130 000 s1 103C3.51 F,re Sparkler System Ne.v - Less t-1an 20.000 s' 20 001-45.000 st 45 001 - SC.000 s' 80 001 - 100 0C3 sl ' 0G OC • s1 =.-e Alarm System <20.000 sl 20.301.45000sf 45.301 • 30 000 51 80.001 - '' 00 00C s` 1)0.301. st Temporary Use Pe'm,t 0.400 sc h he1.5001' 5C1.60C sa 6C t • 70G 5 ( • >;OC sa Ten' - .- - 3.2CC s9: f1- - .... 201 • sS t Carc,es Open Flame Assembly Areas Hot Work - Carn,vals aro Pa.'s Hot YV:-k Penmt Tank Installandn - Abovegrcun0 U'0ergrour0_- per Boor or system er floor o- system per floor or system pe• Boor or syste-r per Boor or system per Boor or system _per Boor or system per Boor or stem r Boor or system floor or S stem each each eacn each each each eacn each each each each each eac' each each each each each each each ' St•). •20Q:e7a :$ •. ;:•2QO.87•' 41-S 200;87. y�.�A,N�Iµi .i'Y �'•. M1. •1afi.� 3 xsk. �¢ ..yy�am� m��02: �, :i"•{.t �. tyl�y�yF^ 5 76100 i - •• k , " S •'.T•i . .. S 987 00 1'306 • r�[•+��j�•�' r '3� -1� + •8F 5 1.27900 ` .0. '•{c•1'G.�.C[#T.3T 1 s '.339.00 YOke 5200.87) 1, { 4'isat $ 92.7 00 8:''- %' 1.279.00 $ 40,1(3t S ' 639.00 •$r': $ 2 037.00 Welt •r8 3A313.9 f 2 745 00 'S'� . 8ees3) $ r. S' IS .803.48'• $ 398.00 -S ,;405:4l) r' �;•1 ,,+ ' :1'8t S 398.00 •S;, 7.Q6$( ) 87oc- :.$, `. r . . P +, . S 530 00 '���. f97bi601 -S,'1, $.57 . 1=•e.375 4407:83: S 662 00 ='$: .R44 181. 5 •'1,96610g.$ `..154135A i. 10,9f :' f 853 00 •)\:i1j452:01) S 461:96.� $ 4vg"(I $ :'•,703;06: 5 273 co r$-,(433.051 y $ •2001(7 ' < L'€.• :. •y1QFi c 5 349 Co $t: 52:?4) S ' 2Q01•e171' -s (: �7•'` tJ` f 74. S 349 CO $^ {(• ini) S - 200:ii7 6 r�C01�h S....5 1.7e 5 349 CC $.L .,C32,74j, 7i.$.•••'2....jr ; it74 S 3490C• ' t:'','52•!4) S (1000 3.'- ... ). "5 -t 27y ti $ 5ao '• 4i5 -$ • .- • O 2..1174, S 345 0C •; t ' j52 ,74), $, •`200.47"". . raw• o �f 345.00 152..7p744�p It1 349.00 S� " •,798) f 100.00 ii `' .0.1,1 Z9e?38) S 051 52 $ 652.63 $ 1,004.35 $ 336.00 $ (668 351 .ti . 361.62 $ •1,004.35' S 206.00 Mk' ',US. Inc. Page of 22 7$ REVENUE IMPACTS Adtusl Annual -Cost Annual . Revenue a Current Fee Annual General Fund Subsidy $ '•. .- ;''.'t30it7., ;$-•- 7r733. •$ '(5;322) '! f4$'�5:'$; :C.-, tr09e" 8 '(1.847, r 8 (S-", r :86T: 's' - (621) r 41 ;5..' .470:'S (1:2321 'S r .1,''4'. '_5,3-19333" `S 115751 • . .`S' :987- $ (17') ,1'49,4 '$^ '2'003> S. `' 2,659. -S. •549 $'•: '11508,.'4'`: •1,639 $ On) S'' ' 9:022 .5 4194 $ (828) $ ' 6;428. S 5,490 f (938) $ _ - 5 • S - S 10445. S 6,174 S (5:271) $ 1.105 :S 398 S (707) $ - : 4.520: S 1,590 5 (2.930) :$' 3.616 :,51 1,324 S (2,292) .5.' 2;Si0• 3 .858 5 (1,452) 'S 10;54k. �$ 4,050 $ (6,496) 'i'• . - $ S - S - S - S 402 IS' 349 5 (53) 8 $ - S - $ - $ - $ - .$ - S - $ - 6 14,061 •,S 12 215 S (',646) -$ 2:611• .$ 4550 S 1.939 $ - 'S - $ - 402. S 349 S (53) $ .803' $ 698 $ 4105) $ 904 $ S (9o4;, i; 349 $ (103) _,.452',,:f .4 1406 , '.$' j94' $ (708) 3 301311$ 10,000. $ (20131) ; 3 $ 2009 S 412 $ (1 697) $ 5 022 S 1,680 $ (3 342) 6'26:08 - 10 ^' AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Work Item • Standard Hourly Rate Tank Removal Ab=veg•ouri _ Jnce•ground So,'vapc-Ex:!ac5or. Install Undergrcjnc P:hng On undergr:unc Tank Pyr_Chem Fre..or<s Bye Load,njc Okay - Vveea Aba:emer: Feld Irspe:hon N0roompl•ante Notice Fire Saran Ins,sect!or hazardous C:cuparcy Renspechon 'A'ter ;) Malrc ous False Ala•m Resconse Fa.se A'a-rn Ressorse State Request (Aouit F. Child Day Care Fan .hes) OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FEES: _ Rate _ S:anOar (standt After Hours_ Each add t.cnal now each each each each each each eacr each each each each each eacr eac1- per tour 2 hours pe• hour SUPPORT TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS Commuray Develocment Comrr ss-cn =n9"eer'3 Piann!n^ annual t•oJrs OTHERNONtFEE ACTIVITIES"- CIP/City-Inlha:ed Protect Support Code Enforcement anr. al tours annual Hours Emergency Response (average) PLOIC Irforma?on Programs annual hours annual hours annual hours annual hours :.,.�,4 .i.•:,-•h1NIT:COSTS,: `s' .:.' ' ' . . RtahCjiedk A'otaaL'biC �Y ri'tl Ine9,c$on lketSt �:i• 7'otilActUak � .t.ost;,,•, 9-firc6eOT4 r'AVerag 1S Current Fee% ,.. (Sabilpr)' -. •44r::I0itit:yy:. 8! 2�6:67 i f3 ' 200:87' -3.;7(2003873 5 ''25109 -SP:'> •• - ' ' 7 D3:OS; S 206.00 ;S'.:L97;9S), $ °251:0/. S < - 261.139 1,•= - 25 :09• •1 lailiVaig s+• d'i' S03.5 $ 206.00 .S ,,,I69V' -�3 ASj'*(203.493 $ '. •J(21:3 4) •$• .. 2.3Q'• S 349.00 '• -66 , 9 S 349 00 '3=•ri$T:0 - :P. j s 60 :5•C 5 349 CO ?5z:.-('t5`3:81 an S • '.0cr.47 S•;1..A5 •• I ?-45.1y8 S 349 :0 S: ' (t02.96) $ 251:09 ShA' (i0fi •,i,7.bie. S 349 00 6+�1531 $ KXVt7SIC f2i09 ,(191/4)5. *._r-_:,. S - S 401 3; ";40t14 $ 2'0.00 .St •..-t?- %-;• :' $ '50.2 Maim S''.400:A4. ' t74 :..-iii2S 0• '+3'>'•- `S!. .,� .-„641-'51152 '•R45196 $ 148.00 :;(304961 j".:,i1f03:0 j ^'V��is t'15. 2 :09% S •48.0C 5 '7600 $ ..1'' '=: '77S.•,5- 0a -3vir01 1 S t00 00 .• . i41.3,t) 3,;:'_ S 5 'SF' J2.i '4 ` 'It $ `(200>87) S - : V17%10 t $ P- 6D2'8i' 1 •f602'6t) ' - (30tii4) ' \:44 (1j506:516) .5. (1{6t160`� (9'64, • 1 •S ''' $r'a-38 •$ - NNRIEMINIE1101 ' $ • 686:96- Si t f t-,:i. !3,. ,80696& 5 1 606.96' S! i su• 't4.60846 S9i (78* �64 � t$ k `1 etc �}, �p.,,,��__��yy��r1 �T irliMIEHMEIME r b 3. • - S - S S •` `.... MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 23 of 22 REVENUE IMPACTS Actual. Annual Cost Annual Revenue @ .Current Fes Annual General Fund Subsidy 'S' - S • S • -$. -703' $ 2C6 S (497) IS; • 4520: •$ . 1030 S (3,4901 1.:..,• -$ . • $ - :5' •-. _' '; • .. • 5 • S - .1 • $ - 'f • '452. '5 349 $ t103), .; ibb •'`S 1047 S (460), ;3` 2 511).:5 - $ (2.5111 ,rS. 1:607 S' 840 S (767) S • .. $ • $ 'A • 6,327 $ 2 072 . S ;4.255) S' 2.671' : $. 1 480 5 (1 0311 'S .3,515 'S 1.760 S '1.755/ .5. - $ - 5 - .S ` 6,025. $ 2.000 $ •4.0261 I. S • S - S' - S • S S- - 'S - $ • 'C'• $ - $ - ;S. - $ - $ - S S - S - S : •- 1 .. - 5 - $ 1.607 5' • $ (16C71 • 1:60Y'3 5 (1.607) 4.1 - . 9.642' •$. - $ (9,642) S S S - ; S - S a - s - •5 �._ $ 8. ' • • 'S• • $ • otal Revenues: 'S'::178:172 S 88.074 $ (90.0981 6.:2608-1001AM City of National City Fire Department -Fire Prevention MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES • ,Workdterin Stanoard Hourly Rate RECOMMENDED FEES Recom- Percent mended Fee Recovery Public Subsidy Per Unit Fre Sprinkler System Irrorovement Less than 20 003 sf 20 C31 •45 000 sf _ 45 00'. - 90 000 sf B0001 . 1)0.000 sf 1 0.00 • sf F,re Spnnder System New Less than 20.000 s' 2C 001 .45.000 sf _ 45.001 -8C 002 sf 30.001 - 1C0 CCO sf re Alarm System <20.000 sf 20.001 - 45.000 of 450031-30000sf 80001-100.0006' 100 001 • sf F,re Protec:,o' System Tem?orary Use Perm*. Canopy 0-400 sc. f1 _ 401.500 sq ft 501.600 so 't_ 601.700 so t >700 sc Hyorart Tort 0-200 sq f: 23•• sq. ft Candles Ooen Flame Asser0Iy Areas _ Hot'N^•k Carnivals and Fars Ho: VJorx °e.rir. Tank Installatcn__., Acosegrouho Unoergrcunc MAY'MUS, Inc. pry floor or system per floor or system per floo• or systerr per floor or system per floor o• system per floor or system floor or system oer floor or system Der floor or system =er floor or system each each each ea:h each eac•1 each each each each each ea& each each each each each each each each 1 S 200 87 100.00% $ c • 5 1 004 35 $ 1,004.35 $ 1.807.83 S 2.510.88 100 00% 100 00% 100 00% 100 00% $ $ S f 3.213.93 $ • 100 00% S 5 $ ' 004.35 100 00% 5 $ 1 004.35 100.00% 5 $ 1 807.83 $ 2 510.88 $ 3 213 93 $ - S 803 48 100.00% S. 100.00% $ 100.00% $ $ 100 00% $ 5 1,10479 5 1,506 53 S 1.807 83 S 2 310.01 100.00% 100 00% 100 00% 100 00% $ S 703.05 $ - $ 401.74 $ 401,74 $ 401.74 $ 401.74 1C0 00% $ S S 100.00% S 10C.00% S 100.00% $ ' 00.00% S $ 43' 74 100.00% $ $ 100 44 100.00% $ - - $ $ 40174 100.00% S $ 401 74 100.00% $ S 451 95 5 451 95 S 703.05 S 301.31 $ - $ 1,304.35 100.00% $ 10,0.00% 100 00% 103 30% 1C0 00% $ $ $ $ f 5 • 004.35 103 00% 5 RECOMMENDED REVENUE Actual Annual Cost Annual Revenue a Reed Fee Annual Public Subsidy S - $ - 5 - $ 13,057 $ 13 057 S - $ 8,035 $ 8 035 S - $ 1.808 $ 1 808 I S • S 2.511 $ 2,511 $ - $ 3,214 $ 3,214 $ - $ - $ $ - $ 1 004 S 1,004 $ - $ 2 009 S 2,009 $ - $ 1808 S 1,808 $ - $ 5 022 S 5,022 $ • S 6 428 $ 6,428 $ - 5 - $ - $ - 5 10445 $ 10445 $ - S 1.105 $ 1105 S - $ 4.520 $ 4 520 S - $ 3,616 $ 3816 $ - S 2,310 $ 2 310 S - $ 10 546 $ 10 546 $ - $ • $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - S 402 $ 402 $ - $ - S - $ - $ - 5 - $ • S - 5 • $ - $ 14 C61 $ 14.061 $ - $ 2611 $ 2841 $ - S - 5 • $ - S 402 $ 402 $ - S 603 $ 803 $ - 5 904 $ 904 $ - S 452 $ 452 5 - S 1 406 $ • 406 $ - 3 30131 $ 30131 5 - $ - $ - S . $ 2.009 $ 2 039 5 • S 5.022 $ 55 C22 5 - Page ')1 of 22 6,25,35. - IC " AM City of National City Fire Department —Fire Prevention MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS PERMIT FEES Work Item ., Unit? • Standard Hourly Rate nk Rero,ai _ — Abovegrounc each Underground _ each Sol Vapor E1,lract.on each Ins:a l Uniercrourc P,pmo Or uroergrourd "ark each Pyro Che'r each Frewrks Barge Loac -,g each _ D,spiar each _ eacr Areeo Abatement Feld Irspect.on _ Noncorlpliarce .Vohce each Fre Sa`ery Inspection earn -lazaroous Occupancy Re,rspechon (After 3; each Malicious rase Alarm Response each False Alan- Response Bann I State Rec.- Jes: -:Adult & Chao Day Care Faalc,es'. each OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FEES: HcunyRate Standard (stancty) per ticur Ater Hours 2 hours Each additcnal hour per tour SUPPORT'TO OTHER DEPARTMENTS ' r •r,::.-:,t: Comr,n.ty Development Cc-nmmsswn annual hours Eng.reenng annual nouns Plar" no annual nou•s OTHER 'NON -FEE ACTIVITIES CiP/Cnylr,tiated Project Support annual hours Coce Enforcement annual no.rs Emergency Resporse(averaae) annualno„'s _ _ PL ri: InforTahor Programs annual hours '•IAXIMUS, Inc. RECOMMENDED FEES Rscom- mended Fee Percent Recovery Public Subsidy Per Unn S 200 87 ' 00.00%I S - S - 5 - S '03 05 10C OC=%° 5 - $ 903.92 10C 00% S - S 652.39 ' OC 00% S - S 552.39 'OOGC% S - $ 502.18 ' 00 0C% S - _ S • 5 - $ 451.96 100 00% S . $502.18 100 00% S - $ 251.09 100 00% $ • $ 401.74 100 00% $ - S • $ . $ 451.96 1CO 00°-< $ - $ 251.09 1C3 00% $ - S 351.52 100 00% $ - S 803.48 10'0 00% $ • $ 301.31 103 00%•> $ • _ S __ $ S - $ - S - S - S_ 20087 $ - S 6026t __130.00% 130.005'. $ - S 30t 31 100,00% $ 5 - $ • $ 1 6C6 56 100.00% S - S 1 606 96 100 00°%° $ - S 9 641 78 100.00% $ - S - $ - $ • .1-5-- 5 5 - 5 S . S S RECOMMENDED REVENUE Actual Annual Cost Annual Revenue i Rec'd Fee Annual Public Subsidy S - S S - S 703 S 733 S - $ z 520 $ 4 520 5 - $ - $ 5 - $ • $ • S S - $ - S - $ $ - $ - $ 452 $ 452 $ - $ 1.507 $ 1507 $ - $ 2,511 $ 2511 $ - $ 1.6C7 $ 607 $ - $ - $ - S - S 6,327 S 6.327 S - 5 2,511 $ 2511 $ $ 3.515 $ 3,515 $ - S - S - $ - S 6.026 5 6,026 $ - S - 5 $ - e 5 $ . S - 5 S - 5 - S S - 5 - S - S 5 - S • $ - 5 - 5 $ - S 1 607 S 1.607 $ - $ .607 _ 5 1.607 $ S 9.642 $ 9.642 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5 - $ - $ - $ - $ - . S • Total Revenues: S 178,172 $ 178.172 5 Page 22 of 22 6.26;06 - 10 01 AM City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS APPENDIX 7: PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE b/ City of National City Planning Department New Fee Schedule Number e%Narile• PL 34 Documents -Subdivision Ordinance PL 35 Documents -Zoning Map PL 36 linvironmental Impact Report (EIR) PL 47 gns-Painted Wall ) Project PL 48 Signs-ReProject PL 49 'Subdivision -Certificate of Compliance Project PL 53 __Subdiv.sion-Lot Merger Project PL 51 Subdivision -Street Vacation IPrcject PL 52 _ 'Subdivision -Street Vacation Initiation Project PL 53 ISubdiv)sion-Tentative Parcel Map !Project PL 54- TSuborvi$Ion-Tentatve Subdlv.s on Maw jProjec T Project PrdAct Project t 1- PL 37 !Misc-Apoeal. Project Processing (non-refundable) Projlict 'Misc-Appeal, Site Plan Review Denial of Owner- PL 38 Occupied Single -Family Dwelling Improvements IProject PL 39 Misc-Historic Site Designation lProject PL 40 MM sc--Home Occupation Permit _Project PL 41 TM.sc-Interpretations • Project PL 42 1M.sc-Larqe Family Day_Care (Project PL 43 I Misc-Zoning/Rebuild Letters Protect PL44 Signs -Banners Administrative Fee Project DELETE -Signs -Banners Processing (no fee for 1 PL 45 jno.lprofits up for 3 days or less) - (Deposit PL 46 SQss-Moddication Nonstructural Pro ect - r lithe* , �otat.Coit`Currantite, PerUjilt., $17.68 $17.00 (SC.68) 51768 $1700 i$C68) 5' 3.417.21 515.147 00 $1 729 79 $3 710.20 $3 553.00 $3,710.20 SO CO t$3.710.23) $5,050.30 S0.00 ` (55 05C.30) $228.51 5238.00 59 49 $5.803 56 $1.119.00 ;$4 684 561 $312 88 $627 00 $228 51 542.18 $102.9C $42.18 542.18 $42.18 PL 55 Subdivision -Time Extension Tentative Parcel Map Project Subdivision -Time Extension. Tentative Sut>d,v s,on PL56_ Map Project PL 57 !Research Fee -• �� --- - - -- . (Project MAXIrMUS. lc: $75 00 5127.00 REVENtit1MPACTS I Reegvered _ I Annual ,.`Mtual , RiWnpe t (_General Fund Ktiiiaalpoif?.CGrfent'Fie - Subsidy 535 534 (S11 5106 ; 8102t ($c). SO( scI- so 1 (5157 20' $3 710 $3.553 1 - , $' 50 _ S0 $0 520,201 I- $0 ($20 201 ) 52,742 I 52 856] $114 55.8041 51119 1 ($4,555j 5314 12 SO 50 50 ($153 51' $2 742 I $90C I- (- i.842j 564.82 5127 53811 $254 51?75.CC 51.872.10 5118.00 $75.82 $25 00 : $17 18 ) $2500 41718, 52 697.39 5' 960.00 ($737 39) $2.697.39 S549.00 :$2 048. 39) $8 904.29 56.553.00 .$2 341 29) 54.045.01 $0.00 t54.345 C1J 56,503.96 f S3,501.00 (53 002.96) $9,942.1' S5.809 00 .54,133 11) $2 288.10 $3.841.92 $181.30 $1 232.00 '5' 056 10. $1.232.0C SO.00 i$2.509.>2; 5'01.3C) Page 2 of 4 Totals $309 $5.925 $5 616 $127 ' S354 $227 $421 525 I (517. $421 _ $251 (517. $5 395 j 53,920 • (51.475' $2 697 $649) (52048; $8.90a $6 56 _ 52.341) $4 C45. $0 - • $4 045) S39,024 521.006 .$18 018) 559 653 r 53a 854 - ($24 '99, S4 576 I $2.464 .52 112• $7.584 $2 464 i5.220) $725 i S0 ($725) 4602A57 1 ' S280,794 1 (S321,663) 6; 26/C 8 City of National City Planning Department New Fee Schedule 1 Fee Number Fee Name RECOMMENDED FEES Fee Amount Percent Recovery Public Subsidy Per Unit RECOMMENDED REVENUE i Annual Actual 1 Revenue tID Annual Public Annual Cost Rec'd Fee Subsidy PL 1 _ Development -Annexation 59 940.00 PL 2 Development -Approval of Plans ) $7 890.00 Development -Coastal Develcoment Permit wlPubihc PL 3_ Heanng _ $9.940 00 !Development -Coastal Development Permit PL 4 _ Iwo/Public Hearing _ 58,730.00 PL 5 Development -Code Amendmen; 59 940.00 : PL 6 )Development -Conditional Use Permit 57,890.00 I_ PL 7 . Development -Consistency Review 510,130.00 PL 8 DeveI pment-General Plan Amendment 1 $9,940.00 1 Development -Initial Study (Environmental PL 9, _ Assessment) I $7.270.00 De elopment-LCP (Local Coastal Program) P. 10_ jAmendment _ _ $9.940 00 PL 11 Develooment-Planned Development Permit ; ;7,890.00 PL 12 Development -Planned Unit Development $8,340.00 1 PL 13 _ IDevelopmer.t-Preliminary Site Plan Review Development -Request to Initiate General/ Speciic PL 14 Plan/Amendment 100.0% 99.9% 100 0% 99.9% 100.0%i 99.9`/0 100.0% 100.0%I 1000%I 100.0% 99.9% 99.9% 99.8°% 52,840.00 1 I 56,430.00 • PL 15 Development -Specific Plan _ $9.940.00 I PL 16 Development -Specific Plan Amendment 1 _ $7 740.00 (Development -Substantial Conformance. I PL 17 Councl/Commission $5,660 00 }Develcpment-Substantial Conformance. Staff I PL 18 'Review _ _ 53,690.00 I Development -Time Extension w/Public Heanng I PL +9__ (CUP PD PUD Variance) __ _ _ 55 710.00 Development-T,me Extension we/Public Hearing I PL 20 'CUP. PD PUD_Variancei . __. 1 54,990.00 PL 21 Development -Variance $8 020.CQT PL 22 Development -Variance (SFR Owner-Occ p ed) ' 58 020 00 PL 23 iDevelopment-Zone BoLndary Determ,nation__ _ ;8.020.00 PL 24 peveiopment--Zon.nq Map Change _) 39 940 00 PL 25 Documents -Design Gu.debres 510 00 PL 26 Documents -General Plan Map'Base Maps 54C 00 1 99.9% 100.0% 100.0% 99.8% 99.8% 99.9%1 100.0% 100.o%l 100.0%i _ $2 03 100.0%i ;2 03 100.0% 56.5% 94.8% PL 27 Documents -General Plan Text 510.00 58.5% 37.68 PL28 !Documents -Housing Element 510.00 56.5%1 57.68 PL 29 'Documents -Land Use Code $10.00 L 58,5% $7.88 PL 30 Doccments-Landscape Guidelines 510.00 58.5°% 57.68 PL 31 _ 'Documents -Local Coastal Plan _ _ $10.00 I 58.5 _ $7.68 PL 32 I Documents --National City Facts 510.00 56.5 % 57.68 Documents -Planning Commission Ageroas ;Annual( I PL33__Subscript.ons� ___. _ _ . __,_._._ , SO 00 0 0% 5884 52.11 55.79 52. 11 56.94 52.11 55.79 53.38 52.11 50 $C $0 50 E2r_ 50 59,942 I 59.940 i 52 $0 I $0 50 59,942I $9,940 $2 5110.541 5110 460 581 5036 52.1t 55.79 57.08 $5.98 59.13 52.11 S2 48 510 133 510 130 519 884 519.880 _ 529,081 I $29,080 1 $9,942 1 59,940 1 594,750 594 680 So I 50 52 846 $2.840 59.92 55.55 56.22 53 54 51 52 $70 $C $6 525 757 525.720 I $37 59 942 59.940 52 $7.742 $7 7401 52 1 55,670 i $5,660 I $10 I 53.6961 53,590 56 1716 L _ $5.710 _ _ _ $6 51.32 59 983 59.980 53 52,03 540,110 $40100J $10 58.022 58.020 _52 50 $C I $0_ 52.11 _ $19884.1 519,880 54 $7 68 535 $20 515 52 18 _ _ 342 $40 . $2. 518 510,1 $8 5181 510 58 518 $10 58 518 $10 _ 518 $10 _58 518 $101 S8 50 S0 50 MAXIMUS. Inc Pap•'+ of 4 F'^A/06 City of National City Planning Department New Fee Schedule .Fee ; Number Fee -Name PL 1 De:elopment-Annexation. PL 2 PL 3 Tpevelopment-App oval of Plans ;Development -Coastal Development Permit Hear.n0 Development -Coastal Development Perm t 'wo_Public Heari 9 'unit.'' `:uN►Tr,COSTQ.'t,' •`` sum(in .. ', • (Subsidy)`;; Total Cost Current Fee I Per Unit Project _ 59_,942.11 $2 861 00 Project _ ! _ S7 895.79 $2.567.03 w/Public _,Pra,ect _ $9 942.1' $3,739.00 (57.081 55.328 $6,203.11) PL 4_ - _ ,Project i - $8 736 94 $2 007.00 '$6 729 94j - PL 5 )Development -Code Amendment 'Project 1 59.942 11 $5 342.00 ($4 600 11) PL 6 i Development-Condit.onal Use Permit _ Project _ _ _ _ $7.895.79 $3.903 00 I53.992.; 9) PL 7 Development--Consusten y Review ,Project _ 510,133.38 50.0C �C.' 33 381 PL 8_ _ ,Development -General Plan Amendment jProject _ + $9 942.11 $7.019 00 .52.923 1"t ;Development -Imo] Study (Environmental PL 9 lAssessment) _ IProject 1- $7 270 36 $' 283 00 :55 987 36; 'Development-LCP (Local Coastal Program) PL 10 Amendment Project $9 942 11 50.00 PL 11 _ !Development -Planned Development Permit _,Proect 53.905.00 PL 12 'Development -Planned Unit Development .Pro'eect $3.903.00 1 57 895.79 �- $8 347 08 T $2 845 98 PL 13 'Development -Preliminary Site Plan Revie.v 'Project $1 439 00 'Development -Request to Initiate General; Specific PL 14 _ Plan/Amendment Project PL 15 _ Development -Specific Plan - _7Protect $9 942.1' 57.C19.00 PL 16 ,Development -Specific Plan Amendment 'Projec' I $7 742 48 57.019 00 ,Development -Substantial Conformance. PL 17 _ .CcunciV'Com.m.ssioc 'Project 50.00 Deve:opment-Substantial Conformance. Staff PL 18 Review Development -Time Extension w,Puohc Hearing PL 19 i(CUP. PD. PUD. Variance) )Development -Time Extensicn wo.'Public Hearing PL 2C_ CUP PD. PUD, Variance - PJect PL 2' ,Development -Variance 'Project PL 22 Development -Variance (SFR Owner-Occupjed) rProiect 55 669.92 Project $3,695.55 $500.00 -f- 'S9 942 1_11 ($3.989 79) (34 444 08j r$' 406 98) 56 439.13 $2.136.00 1$4,3^v3 '3) '52 923 114 ;$723 48) 55 669.521 1$3.•95 35) )Projectt -1_ $5 716.22 $' 872 00 ,$3 844 22j PL 23 Development -Zone Boundary Determination 1Projec. _ PL 24 PL 25 PL 26 PL 27 PL 28 PL 29 PL 3C PL 31 PL 32 PL 33 ' Development -Zoning Mao Change Documents -Design Guidelines documentsn-GeHous1neralnq Plan aQBase Maps Documents -General Plan Text !Documets- ElementM 'Documents-Land Use Code Documents -Landscape Guidelines Documents -Local Coastal Plan Documents -National Cy Facts 'Documents-P:annrn, Commission Agendas (Subscriptions) Project Project 'Project !Project (Annual Project Project IPr ject 'Project Project $4.991.32 $1.151.00 .$3 240 32) $8,022.03 $3.698.03 (54,324.031 $8,022 03 51.761.00 155 261 03) 58.022.03 51 945.00 (Ss 077 031 $9,942 11 $7 332 00 ' $2,6' C ' 1 517.68 S17.00 (50.681 542.18 917.00 •$2518) $17.68 $22 00 517.68 $24 00 $17.68 $64 00 517.68 $0.00 517.68 $64.00 $'768 5300 __L-- E8.84.__5'1900 $4 32 REVENUE IMPACTS -'Attuat AnnuaiCost $0 Recovered Rovenue-ri- CurrenCFee --._ _$0 59 942 1 S0_ $9 942 $110.541 Annual General Fund Subsidy $0 S0 _ _ $0 _, _ _ SO S3.739 I ,S6 235' $0 1 _ SC 55 342 $4 600) 554.642 ($55 899) 510.133 50 I i$10 133. 519.884� $14.038 ' (5 346,1 -r- $29.081 $5132' '$23.945) 59,942 $0 .59 942) 594.75C L $45.872 t ($47.5'82 SC 50 ,, S0 525,757. $8.544 59,942 $7,019 $7,742 ; 57.015 $5 670 $6 32 $46.32 (51'•°8) $46.32 6s3j S'•1016 $0 .$17213) ,$29231 53.696_j__ 5500 .53 196) $5.716 ' $1,872 __(.$3.844, $9 983 _ $2 302 _ $_ 63 ;1 $40.110 , 518 490 _ c$2- 620) 58,022 I S6 261 SO 1 $� _ SO 19884 $'451.7616641 •SE22C) 535 $34 5") 542 j, 517 S6 $18 4 525) $18 I 522 , S4 $18rt $24 . 56 t- -$ oo $18 $0 ,S_.8) $18 554 _ _ _ $46 $18 - -- SO' - (518 I i $0 $0 ' SC MAXIfr'US Inc Page 1 0' 4 6/26/08 PL 39 IMis: Historic Site Designation PL a0 _ IMisc-Home Occupation Permit PL41 Misc-Interpretations PL 42 Misc-Large Family Day Care PL. 43 Mist-Zoning/Rebuild Letters PL 44. _ Signs -Banners , Administrative Fee 1 ,DELETE -Signs -Banners. Processing (no fee fcr PL 45 Fnon-profits up for 3 days or less) _ PL 46 Signs-Mootfcation, Nonstructural City of National City Planning Department New Fee Schedule Fee -Number F66 Name RECOMMENDED FEES PL34 Documents -Subdivision Ordinan PL 35 (Documents -Zoning Map PL 35 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) Public Percent Subsidy Per Fe* Amount Recovery 1 Unit S10.00 56.5% $7.68 51D.DD 56.5%1 57.68 513.410.00 L 99.9%i 57.21 PL 37 Misc-Apoeat, Project Processing (non-refundable) $3 710 00 'Mist -Appeal. Site Plan Review Denial of Owner- PL 38 _ !Occupied Single -Family Dwelling Improvements $3,710.00 55,050.00 PL 47 Signs -Painted Wall PL 46 _ Signs -Reface PL 49 -I Suoaivisior_-Certificate of Compliance PL 50 S odivislon-Lot Merger PL 5' bdivislon-Street Vacation PL 52 Subdivision -Street Vacation Initiation J PL 53 Subd,wmon-Tentative Parcel Map PL 54_ _Subdivision -Tentative Subdivision Map _ PL 55 Subdivision -Time Extensior. Tentative Parcel Map S odivislon-Tme Extension. Tentative Subdivision 1 PL 56 _ 'Map PL 57 Researcn Fee $220.00 $5,800.00 100.0%l 50.20 100.0% $0.20 100.0% 50.30 RECOMMENDED REVENUE Actual Annual Cost Annual Revenue @ Annual Public Rec'd Fee Subsidy 535 S20 $15 S106 560 546 96.3%1 58.51 99.9% 53.56 5310.00 , 99.1 % I 52.88 $220 00 98.3% $8.51 $40 00 94.8% $2 18 50.00I 0.09E $102.90 540.001 94.8%I 52.18 540.00 1 94.8%1 52.18 $40.00I 94,8% $2.18 $2 690.00 99.7%}-- $7.39 52,690.00 99.7%1 $7.39 $8.900.00 100.0% 34.29 99.9% $5.01 54,040.00 1 56,500.00 99.9%1 53_96 59.940.00 100.0%t $2 11 $2 280 00 99.6%1 $8 10 53,840.00 ' 100.0% 51 92 $180.0C 99.3°./e 31.30 50 $0 SC $3.710 $3 710 i $0 $0 I _ 50 ; $0 S20201 _ _$20.200 S 1 $2 742 ' $2.640 5102 $5,804 I- $5 800 54 50 $0 1 50 32 742 $2.640 1 5102 $127I $120I $7 $3091 SO$309 51271 S120 57 542 $40 $2 $42 $40 L__ _ 52 $5 395 $5 380 515 S2.6971 $2,690 $7 S8, 904 1 58,9001, 54 $4 045 54,040 I $5 539,024 I- 539 C00 $24 $59,653 $59 640 $13 I $4 576 54 560 516 57,684 I 57.68C $4 $725I $7201 $5 VAX IMJS Inc Page ' of 5802,457 $801,480 $ ,007 City of National City Citywide User Fee Update MAXIMUS APPENDIX 8: POLICE FEE SCHEDULE / 3 Co City of National City Police Department New Fee Schedule t,i, tallT•icQSTS: ‘,; ,t•: CurrentFee , .::•.., • Srurplusi V' `.. (8ubsldy) Psr Unit REVENUE IMPACTS . Fee :Number •,Fee•Nin►a . . •• UoIt • 1 1,� Total:COM. , i. Artul1:... • Annual,Cost ;'Recovered 1Revenus oa Current Fee Annual General Fund Subsidy PD 1 An.mal Ctrt-Dog_License, 1 Year. Unaltered Per Issuance $13 11 50.00 (S' 3211 $13 50 tS13. PD 2 An.mal Ctrt-Dog License. 1 Year. Altered Per Issuance $13 11 50.00 ($' 3.11) $13 SO ($13) PD 3 An.mal Ctrs -Dog License. 2 Yea; Unaltered An,mal Ctrl-Dog License, 2 Year. Altered Per Issuance 513 11 50.00 ;$'3 11( $13 _. SO (S132 (513; PD 4 Per Issuance $13 11 50.00 ($, 3.11), _ $13 $13 SO PD 5 An.mai Ctrt-Dog License 3 Year. Unaltered Per Issuance $13 11 $0.00 (.S' 3. )1) 50 (513) PD 6 Animal Ctrt-Dog License. 3 Year, Altered L Per Issuance 1 513.11 $0.00 4:3 :1) $13 SOf ($13) PD 7 Animal Ctrl-Dog License Replacement Per Issuance I $13 11 $0.00 ;S'3 '11 $13 SO _ ($13) PD 8 Animal Ctr1-Junsdict.onal Transfer of Doo License IPer Issuance 513.11 $0.00 `$' 3.' 1 i1) r$115 041 $13 50] ($13) PD 9 An.mal Ctrl-Animal Quarantine Release Per Issuance $165.04 550.0C $9 902 $3,000 ($6 9021 _ PD 10 Animal Ctrt-Animal Relinquishment Per Issuance 550.77 S50.00 (SO 77) 5406 5400 ' ($6' PD 11 An.mal Ctrt---Dead An.mal Pickup_ Per Issuance 56.32 550.00 $43.68 $13 5100 $67 PD 12 PD 13 An.mal Ctrt-Tranquilizer Per Issuance 576.16 S50.00 426 1 $1.066 $700 1 (5366. Anir-ial Ctrt-Guard Dog Perm.t Per Issuance $76.16 550.00 ($26 16) _ _ $76 $50 ' ($26. PD 14 Ar..mal Ctrl-Non-Allcweo Animal Perm t Per Issuance $76.16 $5.00 ($71 16 $76 55 ($71 i PD 15 Alarm Parma Per Issuance 530.48 $0.00 (530 48) $30 SO i ($301 (515h1 PD 16 •S ce o d Response (_Louo Music, Parresi Per Issuance 5153.67 $0.00 ($153 57) $154 S0 PD 17 _ _ _. 'False Alarm Response (F.ne per Muni Code) 'Per Issuance 5201.49 550.00 (5151 49) _ 52C.149 55,000 (515 149( PD 18 PD 19 PD 20 Events-Distnct Sponsored ihourly) Hourly. S103.86 30.00 $0.30 ($103 86) $104 SO 3104i t ii��Scnool [bcnool Events-ASB Sponsored (hourly) Hourly Hourly 5103.86 ($103 86i $104 SO (S 104) Special Events-Profit'no,.ry), $103.86 S0.00 ($103 86. $104 50 (5104, PD 2' Events -Non -Profit (^ourly' Hourly $103.86 $0.00 , _ _ ($103 861 $104 SO 55104, ,Special PD 22 Parking/Traffic Control -Profit (hourly) Hourly $56.57 S0 00 ($56 57i 557 50 ($571 PD 23 PD 24 Park.ng!Traffic Control -Non -Pre -a Hourly $56.57 SO 00 ($56 57. $57 ' _SO . ($57 i F.rgerprint-DELETE Per Request Per Request $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0 . SO I SO li S0 PD 25 Pr.otooraphs $19.95 $20 00 50.05 $20 $20 PD26INegl.gent PD 27 PD 28 _ PD 25 Vehicle ImpoundrRelease Per Incident 5124.37 $5500 ($69371 $196.995' $88.000, •$'10995) TLcke: Sign -Offs Per Request $25.96 S0.00 ($25 96) ($8 881 S31.157 50 ($31 1571 Vehicle Repossesion Per Incident $8.88 S0.00 $44 $0 ' ($44 i •VIN Verification Per Request $77.89 $0.00 477 89. _ $1 869 SO $61 SC ' 41 869) PD 3C Research Hourly Rate Per Request 560.67 $0.00 1$60 67) 461 i PC_31 PC 32 PD 33 _ _ Acc.dent Report Per Request $13.06. $13.06 _ $0.00 $0 00 _ ($13 06) $13 SO ($131 _ _ (513i SS762i . _ Crime Report Per Request Per Request 1$13 06) $13 SO _ Subpoena _ $42.57 510.00 (532 57) 51 022 522 755 $240 PD 34 _ PD 35 Req,,est for Report Per Request _ $13.06_ $198.30 $10 30 50.00 .53 06. $17.42C r ($5,335) Record CheckrClearance Letter No Record Proiect t$198 301 529 746 SC 1 (S29 746; MAXIMUS. Inc aaop' cf 1 Totals: 83111,200 S114,935 I (5203,265j City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 15, 21)08 AGENDA ITEM NO. 19 ITEM TITLE Public Hearing - Conditional Use Permit and Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect for a 16-Unit Apartment Project at 2701-2703, and 2729 F.ast I8`h Street (Applicants Productive Real Estate, LLC.) (Case File No 2007-60 CUP, IS) (WL Martin Reeder. 336-4310 PREPARED BY EXPLANATION DEPARTMENT Planning City Council considered this item at their May 6, 2008 meeting, at which time concerns were raised by community members. Considering this input, ('ouncil continued the item in order for the applicant to reconsider the apartment complex proposal. Concerns over the proposed commercial zoning. lack of ownership opportunities. density and the number of units were cited. The applicant is now suggesting a ten -unit single-family project with condominium ownership. The background report describes the matter in more detail The related General Plan Amendment and 7.onc Change are also on tonight's agenda as a Public Hearing (Case File No. 2007-60 GP. ZC) Environmental Review Proposed Negative Declaration (2007-60 IS) Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION kg' That the applicant withdraw the Cl!P request ifa single-family project is pursued. BOARD 1 COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. 1 May 6, 2008 Staff Report 2. Background Report 3. Planning Commission Reso. No. 8-2008 5. Department/Agency Comments 4. Location Map 6. Applicant's Revised Plans A-200 (9/99) BACKGROUND REPORT The project site, consisting of two existing parcels. is a 37,835 square -toot rectangular property that stretches from East I8th Street to East 17th Street. Three single-family homes currently occupy the project site, two on one lot and one on the adjacent parcel. The lots contain little vegetation, with some mature eucalyptus trees and grass. The applicant was originally proposing to. construct a two-story 16-unit multi -family residential development. However, in response to C'ouneil comments, the applicant has made changes to the project and is now proposing 10 detached single-family homes Concept plans submitted to the Planning Department show two different designs, both two-story three -bedroom units as before. 'I'hc Iloor plans are quite similar to the original design and the homes would again have a two -car garage. l he concept site plan shows individual rear yards tur each unit as well as multiple guest parking spaces and a common landscaped area in the rear of the property. In response to concerns cited by Council and based on encouragement from staff, the applicant has stated that they arc willing to process a Tentative Subdivision Map to provide home ownership opportunities; the IO units are proposed to he condominium ownership rather than individual lots. The homes themselves and the proposed individual private yards would comprise the exclusive arca, while the driveway. guest parking. and landscape areas would comprise the common arca. In order for the applicant to continue with this application and given the significant changes made at the prompting of Council, the project would need to go back to Planning Commission for re -review and approval. One option for instigating this route would he tier Council to initiate proceedings so that the applicant may resubmit the new design along with the Tentative Subdivision Map. Concept plans submitted for review would need to be refined prior returning to Planning Commission. The applicant has stated that they wish to make sure the new design is satisfactory to Council prior to submitting a lull detailed plan set including a tentative map. 1 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE Mak 6, 21108 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE Notice of I )ecision - Planning Commission Approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Finding of No Significant I-:nvironntental Fttcct, and Authorizing the Filing of a Notice of f)etetniination for a I6-Unit Apartment Project at 2701-2703, and 2729 East I8'h Street (Applicant: Productive Real Estate, I.I.('.) (Case file No. 2007-60 CUP, IS) PREPARED BY Martin Reeder. 336-4310 DEPARTMENT Planning EXPLANATION Planning Commission held a hearing on this item on Apnl 7. 2008, and Voted to approve the (.UP with an additional Condition of Approval to provide additional parking. The attached background report describes the proposal in detail The ( ;Lateral Plan Amendment and Lone Change necessary to permit this type of development arc also on tonight's agenda as a Public Hearing (Case File No. 2007-60 GI', %.C) Environmental Review Proposed Negative I)cclaration (2007-60 IS) Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION I 7CStaff concurs with the decision ofthe Planning Conuuission and recommends that the Notice of Dcciion be tiled. BOARD 1 COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION fhc Planning (bnuttission recommends Approval of the Combined Genctal Plan/toning Map Amendment. Vote: Ayes: DeLaPaz, Pruitt. Reynolds, Mores Nays: Alvarado, Itaca ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. I. Background Report 4 Site Photos 2. Planning Commission Resolution No. 8-2008 5. Applicants Plans 3. Location Map 2 A-200 ('JI99) BACKGROUND REPORT The project site, consisting of two existing parcels, is a 37,835 square -foot rectangular property that stretches from East 18'h Street to East 17th Street. The property is relatively flat for the first 190 feet, falling just ten feet, before sloping down another 15 to 20 feet to 17th Street. East I7`t' Street is an unimproved street with a 20-loot right-of-way. Three single-family homes currently occupy the project site, two on Assessors Parcel Number 558-200-18 and one on Assessors Parcel Number 558-200-17. The Tots contain little vegetation, with some mantic eucalyptus trees and grass. The applicant is proposing to constnict a two-story 16-unit multi-larnily residential development. The duee existing homes would he demolished and two eight -unit apartment buildings, 2,100 square -feet of common open space for tenant recreational use, and four guest parking spaces would he constructed on site. Each of the sixteen units will he 1,507 square -feet, and include a 400 square - loot, two -ear garage. The units will have three bedrooms and two -and -a -half bathrooms, as well as approximately 3%0 square -feet of private open space consisting of two second -story decks and a private yard at ground level. The primary construction materials include a stucco finish, asphalt roof shingles. with wrought iron and cedar fencing. Access to the site will be from East 18th Street via a 24-foot driveway. The proposal will achieve General Plan policies by increasing the number of rental opportunities in the ('ity; developing an underutilized property to a higher use; and incorporating quality design elements. As proposed, plans comply with Land Use Code requirements with regard to setbacks, height, minimum unit sizes, floor area ratio, open space, resident and guest parking. No exceptions from any Land Use Code requirements are being requested. At the Planning Commission hearing. Commissioners asked questions regarding parking and adjacent street access. Several members of the public were present, some in support and some with concerns regarding the potential for additional vehicles parked on City streets. The Comnssion voted to approve the proposal with an added condition (No. 31) requiring that a proposed retaining wall in the rear of the property be moved north to add four additional parking spaces. The applicant has since redesigned the parking configuration to provide the requisite spaces. The attached plans reflect the most recent design. 3 R FS()1..ftTION NO. 8 2008 A R1-SO1 1.111ON OF l lI[. PLANNING COMMISSION OF FI1) CI IY OF NATIONAI. CITY, CALIFORNIA. APPROVING A ('ONI)I' IONAI. I ISE. PERMIT ANI) FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT EN\'IRONMI.N I AL EFFEC F, ANI) A(JTI IOR(%.IN(THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF UI'.11•RMINA HON FOR A 16-11NI1' APARTMENT PROJECI AT 2701 2703, AND 2/20 FAST' Ixi" STRFEI- AI'PI I( 'ANT PR(.)U(JCTIVE REAL ESTA I F. I I.(' ('ASF FILE NO 2007-60 (.I JI WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of National City umsidercd a Proposed Finding of No Significant Enviruninental Impact and a Conditional Ilse Penult lot a l6-Unit Apartment Project at .2701-2703 and 2729 Fast 18th Street, APN S58-200-17 and IS. at a duly advcttiscd public hearing held on April 7, 2008, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and, WI11-REAS, at said public hearing the Planning ('ommiss on considered the staff report contained in Case File No 2007-60 ('1JP and 2007 60 IS, maintained by the City and incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing, and. \VIIERI:AS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures reluucd by State law and (.7ity law, and, WIII.REAS, the action tccited hetcui is hound to he essential for the picsti 'ation of public health, safety, and general welfare NO\V. 'I HI•.R1-.F01tE, [3E. IT RESOLVE!) by the Planning ('onuuissn n of the City. ol• National City, ( that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning, ('oninic.,n)11 al the public hearing held on April 7. at)08, snppott the Iollowing findings: RECOMMENDED) F[NI)IN(,S FOR APPROVAL OF TIIF CONDITIONAI (ISF I'1-RMI1 I . That the site for the proposed use is adequate in site and shape, since the 0.81 acre site can accomn t date the development of two eight unit, two story apartment buildings with attached garages, turn on -site guest parking spaces, pmatc access driveway. euuunun landscaped areas, and puvatu open space l(ir each unit with no exceptions from Code requirements. 'float the site Itas sufficient access to streets and highways that are adequate in width and pavement type to carry the volume and type of traffic generated by the proposed use, since IR"' Street (a ma)ot culleetor toad) has ,u11icicnt capacity to adequately haricll.• the approximately 96 average daily hips (AD.' ) generated by the protect without a significant decrease in thetr operating levels tit set vice 4 That the proposed use will not have an adverse effect upon adiaccnt or abutting; piulxrties, since other properties in the area are currently developed with small-scale multi -family uses and crnnuuctcial devefopnnCirI, and since Ili) rxcepUun: Irani ('ode requirements are r rif ucsted. That the proposed use is deemed essential and de.nablc to the public convenience and welfare, since the projext will provide new rental opp oitunities and will piuniutc the development and use of a currently unden►tilicel property. RF('OMMENDEI) FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF IF. NEGATIVE Di•('LARA'FION — — i. That the Negative Declaration (20117-00 iS) has been read and considered together with any comments received during the public review process; and. 7 That based on the whole record including the Initial Study, there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment and that the Negative Declaration reflects the ( 'it y's independent judgment and analysis. BE IT F1 IIR I'HER RFSOI.Vl- D that the Pl:uunng Commission has considered the proposed Negative Declaration No. 2007-(i() IS, together with :any comments received during the public review process, and finds on the basis of the whole record (including; the Initial Study and any comments reccn•ed) that there is no substantial evidence that the pooled will have a significant effect on the envirorunent and that the Negative Mid:it:ition reflects the l'ity's independent judgment and analysis, and hereby reconnnnends approves the. Negative Dectaratioil and author ices the tiling of a Notice of I)ciennrnation. BF IT FUR 111E12 RESOLVED that the application for Conditional iIse Permit is recommended to he approved subject to the following conditions t. This General ('onditional Use Permit authonzes the consiructiun of I(i apattiucnt units. Except as slurred by conditions of approval, all plans submitted tun penults assoi:natirl With the project shall umttiinn with Exhibit A •Revised. (.':tse File no. 2007 -(0 (;P1•LC%CI IP. dated I /224'2008. 2. A detatkd landscape. and underground irrigation plan, including plant types, methods of planting, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning 1)riectoi. 'I ate landscape plait shall reflect the use of drourju tolerant planting and water conserving; ungation devices. Areas between the proposed buildings and adjacent sheets shall he plaited with a minimum of two street bees in order to screen the buildings from artfaccnt uses. 3 A Lot Merger and Certificate of Compliance shall he procuted upon approval of this permit. The Certificate of ('ompliance shall he recorded prior to issuance of building pet mn. 4 At the time of construction of 17'i' Street, the owner of the limpetty at that time shall ienioe'e all landscape, in'gation and fence elements that lay within the 20-fimt Iuture dedication :ilea at the tear oldie pitmen y. 5. Plans must comply with the 20)7 editions of the California Building ('ode, the California Mechanical ('ode, the California Plumbing ('rkle, the California Electrical ('ode, California Fire ('ode and California Title 24 energy and handicapped regulations 5 6 Incorporate green building practices and Americans with Disabilities Act (Ah)A) requirements into the design ens neiia as they apply. 7. Television cable companies shall be notified a minimum of -IX hour pnor to tilling of cable licnc;hes X fhe Pnority Project Applicability checklist for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (Nt'DES) is iequired to be completed and submitted to the Engtiiecnutg Department. The checklist will he required when a project site is submitted film ieview of the City Departments. The checklist is available at the Engineer mg Department If it is detrimmted that the police! is subject to the " Pmtority Project Permanent Storm \Water B(rll' Requirements" an(1 the City of National ('sty Storm Water Best 1\tati;i Intent Practices of the. Jutis(Iictional IJrban Runoff Management Program (11IRIv1P) approved Standard lliban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (St ISMP) documentation will he requited pnor to issuance of an applicable engineering permit. The SUSMP shall he prepared by a Registered ('iv►l t :nginecr 9. The Best Management Practices (l3MPs) tot the maintenance of the proposed construction shall he undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NI'DLS) regulations winch may require a Stonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWIPE') for the plolect An approved SWPI'P will he required pnor to issuing of a construction peinut. 19. All surface run-oll shall he treated with an approved Standard Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan (SI_ISMP) Best Management I'iacrice (IiMP) for all Piioiny St ISM!' projects No runoff will be permitted to flow over the sidewalk. Adjacent properties shall he piotected from surface run off resulting from this development I . A grading and drainage plan shall be submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on - site and off site improvements The plan shall be prepared in accordance ‘(ith the C►ty's standard requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary mown es for prevention of storm (vateu pollution and hazardous nmatemial run off to the public storm drain system from the imposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This shall include the provision of such tic ices as storm drain interceptors, claiiftei-s, or filters. Best Management Practices lint the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, nmonitomi rig, and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in aceotdancc tvith the National Pollution Discltamge Elimination System (NI'DES) regulations. A private storm water treatment maintenance aarement shall he signed and recorded A checklist for prcpaiahon of the grading, plan.drainagc plan is available at the Engineciing I)epartment. 12. A sewer permit will be requited. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall he shown on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the ('its• right of -way shall be 6-inch in site with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the r-r ub to mark the location of the lateral. 13. A soils etiginr'eiing report shall be submitted for the Engineering Depamtnment s review. attei Planning ('om mission approval 'the report shall address the stability of all of the existing and proposed slopes on the pious ray. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil heating pressure and the required pavement structural sections fog the proposed streets, the parking areas. and the dmivcways. As a minimum, the parking, lot pavement sections shall he 2 in h A owes 4 6 inch Class It aggregate base The street pavement sections shall he in accordance with National Pity modified Standard Drafting (i ;4 All soils report finding and t ecA mm. ndatlons shall be part of the Fngmtcer u,g Department requirements 14. Street tight •ot wav shall he dedicated to the Pity (approximately 20 feet by 1 tK feet on 17'h Sweet) 15. A pcdcstatan Ramp shall be installed un 18'h Street and shall comply with the A 1) A requirements and the San Diego Regional Standard Drawings. 16. All existing survey monuments, including any benchmark, within the houmdanes of the project shall he shown on the plans. If disturbed, a licensed land surveyor or civil engineer shall restore them after completion of the work. A Comer Recoil shall be filed with the County of San Dieu Recoltie, A copy of the documents filed shall he given to the City of National ('try Engineering Department as soon as tiled. 17. A permit shall be obtained from the Fnstneeiing Department for all uuptovenent work within the public right-of-tvay, and any grading construction on private properly 18. Abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb, gum,' and sidewalks. All missing street improvements on 17'' Street shall be constructed unless the applicant applies for deferment of irnpto‘‘cnacnts to the I{ng,neenng. Department. Street unptovemcnts shall be in accordance with ('fly Standards. 19. A title report shall he submitted to the Engineering Department, after the Planning Commission approval, lin ,cvtcw of all existing casements and the ow•ncaslup at the property. 20 A cost estimate lot all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and retaining wall work shall be submitted with the plans. A perfomaance bond equal to the approved cost estimate shall he posted. Tluce percent (;%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited with the (.'aty as an initial cost for plan checking and nrspcctum services at the time the plans are subnutted. The deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours and consultant services 21. Parking shall be ptutubite.l in all ateas excepting garages and designated gmcst pal king spaces. 'IIIe driveway shall he painted with a red stripe on either side and marked as "no parking lire lame'. Prior to building permits. provide a Standard ("Man Storm Water Nlitigation Plan (SUSMI') that provides Site Design, Source Control and l ieattnent Control Best Management Practices in compliance with the (.'ity's SUSHI' (hduaance. 21. The project is to be designed, developed and constructed in compliance with the Caliti,rnia Eire Code (CF() 2007 edition of ('E(.' ua el feet at time of pemtil issuance and the most cunenl National Fite Pluteehom Association (NFPA) Standards and Pity of National City Municipal (.'ode and ( )Idrnances as adopted by the City of National City 24. Property to he addressed in ntamtet to cica,Iv visible from the street 25 Estimated minimum Inc flow requitement will he 4,000 gprn measured at 20 psi te.'adual presmite tvath a duration of lour flouts 26. Prier to building permits, rulotutatwn Icgar,drng lire flow requncntcnts shall be submitted to Sweetwater Authority to determine the need liar new water systems of substantial alteration to the existing water system, 27. Within four (4) days of approval, pursuant to Fish and (came Code 711.4 and the California ('ode of Regulations, Title 14, Section 753.5, the applicant shall pay all necessary environmental tiling lees to the San Diego (.'aunty Clerk. Checks shall be made payable to the County Clerk and submitted to the National ('ity 1'Iaiuung I)cpartinent. At this time, the tiling fee is $1,870 75 for a Mitigated Negative Declaration, and a County ('Ierk processing tee of $ 50.00. 2X. Before this (icnetal flan Autendmcnt, Zone Change and Conditional Use Permit shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign and have notarized an Acceptance Fonn, providexi by the Planning Department, acknowledging, and accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this perm F: iliac to ietum the signed and uotaivccl Acceptance Fonn within 110 days ut its receipt shall automatically terminate the ( Plan Amendment, Zone Change and Conditional Use Pennit. 'I he applicant shall also submit evidence to the satistaction of the Planning Director that a Notice of Resnieaion on Real Property is iccrndcd with the County Recorder The applicant shall pay necessary reuirding lees to the County "Il►c Notice of Restriction shall provide lamination that conditions unposed by approval of the (3eneial Plan Amendment, Zone Change and (.'onditiona) lise Permit are binding on all present or future inteiest holden or estate holders of the pioperty. "Ile Notice of Restriction shall he appiovexl as to toms hy the City Attorney and signed hy the Planning )ucell'i piiur to recordation. 29. This permit shall become null and void if not cxeie iscel within one year after adoption of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in Suction 18.1 16.190 of the Municipal Code. 30. The Conditional t Ise Permit shall not he effective, and building permits shall not he issued until the lone designation affecting the property i:; approved hy the City Council and amended to Limited ('onunercial 31. The retaining wall at the rear of the piopetty shall be moved north to accommodate tout additional parking spaecs, to the satisfaction of the Planning: and Fitgutecring Depat intents. 13E IF FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution he ti,unsnuticd forthwith to the applicant and to the City ( 13E IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the day following the City Council meeting where the Planning ('omnnsswn resolution is set for review, unless an appeal in eviLing is Iilcd with the City Clerk prior to',:00 p ni. on the day of that City Council meeting. "1 he ('ity Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the Planning Commission and set the mallet kit piddle hcanng tit CERTIFICATION: ILu retttlicti that the Rci;olution tcaN adopted by the Planning Conunisqiiii at their meeting of Alu tl /, 1U()`{. the following vote. AYES: NAYS. AlitihNl- ABSTAIN Pruitt. DeI;,I it. Reyn��lcl., fl e Alcatado, I3aca ('IIA[RWOMIANI 9 1604 16k11cr o o 1615 1625 1635 1624 S. / - CO 1-22 CL \121 6� cS� -ast1gNek hStceN O N —` 101 � 1g15 — / 1825 -a cP — \/ - 6) 824 RS-2 — cP 01 - CL \ N-1 \ NQ01, 5 N , N-a trip \ — — \ 0 eve/ - — — — 1810 1g26 1636 RS-3-PD ZONE BOUNDARY — — — • Pht().1f 1 SITE 100 0 100 Feet LOCATION MAP 2007- cup , ZC, General Plan Amendment and Zone Change from RS-2 to CL and a Conditional Use Permit for a 16-Unit Apartment Protect at 2701, 2703 and 2729 L.18 the Street NATIONAL C11JY PLANNING DRN. DATE: 3/13/08 INITIAL HEARING: 4/7/08 2 LOOKING INTO SIZE FROM E. I?TH ST, FROM ACROSS NORTH-EAST CORNER OF SITE LOOKING IRO LEFT LOT OF S4 E FROM f$TN ST. LOOKING INTO RIGHT LOT OF SITE FROM /ITN ST. My, 1 LA /' S IPROJECT DATA: Maa.i • M om•..1••••.w - ,n. r� w —I.r V 04110 w... d r .• . .0.W r.. aw .O.O WR.AM Is•WO ..M... O' ✓ m. /tam... w ▪ • W aa ,.r ▪ di••I NV .•a..w w.a•... }IciVTY_M4P PARCEL MAP MOSE L Os, ST. ... .. I•Y! .0.41.1Q4• •. IIt.._ K • • y..y.. L ISTA S1 - 1 SM. _ PLAN .r j kj ,.w •••••• NM. MO • ••••• VINEIMOr• 11.11011.1•11•0 elbit •••••• W•11/011.X.P. VIVI3OSSV NVIV9Vii I 4 - Otos smatturv.tv si musva amain I - 1: rTi W 1 > rna r ag 1 4 12 i rrw r• UNIT APARTMENTS FOR VICr'OR CASTRO sH.ssO Awe TUCIda R. 6 —v HAGMAN & ASSOCIATES ATbld%rldla nits— se....w S Ywl.waq(4 w •MIA.11.•w..h w1sr _SP im IIilp Rppu. EAST ELEVATION .11: ?it 11 ite Auk- ITH1411111NPJ LIN NORTH ELEVATION M1TEFI' FROM 1'771. .S7ji 1 110 v 1.<6.1 Lf 743, I'.ST.,T X' %y �N.a//i yam, En '., )H� .C4..w.u. ^I V•'W1rs ..a,..y tr • • ud NI Or/ L • wF' • w . M •SCR _ - G ,tTR ST_ cos CVTIUL IANDSCAPENG PLAN ..wv 06.IW.%1 q..,. .an....w ro ...Od.ati...�,w 4Y/e♦r.'iC ICM.M.% "M {1.<J44.t..116[ M•.. .. • 7-1 MeV OW sn01 M1 r_ Oa. ST. s� E Imt ST. • PRELDILV AR'' GRADING PLAN • x L .I 000C] G„ + "i 161 dP .a withTr ;s / 4 14 8' I.I rr:r. doors to oat,o 34 19'4.. Buy SmartDraw!- purchased copies prin, this di$ment wilnout a watermark Visa www smaridraw corn or rall 1.800-7V-3729. 3G 1=. 15 ON,ce/cecr.cente• SmartDr¢sJ- p(ttCh Copies print t 14. isit www.smartdrawseom or call 1-800-768-3 29. :9 7' 38 D'.r� 4- Kl:cue,, J 20'7 5•4- 4 4 onrs ROC, Buy Smaar�tDrraw�4. .g�- purhhyased vis'.. �1�1!11� C-) PAN "2_ Loc v_ N.) 16 Mister BeO•ocm :5'8- 108' 7x9 LN Bedroom 2 Bearcorr 3 I _ k_dic-cfJ 'TT 25 15'4' BLv SmartDraw ikurcbased cages pJt tn s 3 Ann ....newt...1in., a n nel. 1 V Sit VIVAV smartaraw.opin o caii 1-800-768-3:29 ; • , ' J4'. 4S I.'g sots I•st•.to. :SS l»cg fof:! Se:oro 'Oo" 'r.• t <' s• m-vg space • "Ss, peace Root...re rA1 -o.. re fr,^9e r,r, E rta cr Ie4Ve0 sa.c:o ,Nnopw's `, r ,Ie d is CMe c •••E Cotssbuttan ::aso ,••—^9 Fou-orIcn Crr •r. '1 T L-____� _._ I......._. 4.---t t)_ t!�Yfj1 E i...I • • • 6' Os+ sosce t - r. floc, 1C79stivng soece a;oic coo, Tali r+ins state 1583 sc. 'e'feet • east garage Roo. Tvpe Asahe Jl'r rle sr ogle 39yr Exley or Textu•ea M_co sow vnye Lev:.E due, rene wira sys wr{/-as .coca rrenno roraetor Covet, ; City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ,IEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 20 ITEM TITLE Hold a public hearing to consider adoption of the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program of Projects (RTIP) for National City for fiscal years 2009 through 2013 PREPARED BY Alberto Griego EXPLANATION See attached Explanation. DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4386 Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMEN ATION th public h g. OARD / C IS ECO N/A l ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1 Resolution 2. TransNet Project List for National City hearing A-200(Rev .I,O:) Hold a public hearing to consider adoption of the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program of Projects (RTIP) for National City for fiscal years 2009 through 2014 Explanation: SANDAG is required by State and Federal law to develop and adopt a Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) every two years. The RTIP is a multi -year program of proposed major highway, arterial, local, transit, and bikeway projects which includes the TransNet Program of projects which cover Fiscal Years 2009 to 2013 and is due to the State on August, 2008. Each local agency is required to hold a public hearing and adopt its Five -Year TransNet Local Street and Road Program of projects by Resolution. This public hearing is to accept public testimony on the draft 2008 RTIP for National City. The City of National City has three projects that are funded by TransNet Funds which are the following: "'aza Boulevard Widening, ,greet Resurfacing Project Traffic Signal Install/Upgrade Upon conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council is asked to direct staff to finalize the RTIP, including responding to any significant public comments and recommend the adoption of the final National City RTIP. See attached TransNet Project List. National City, City of DRAFT 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) Mt'O It) NC01 Capacity Stztus CI It rIP f1 08 00 Tll LI- Plaza lilvi Wrlenrng UE S(:RIP FION Pla: a Blvd from Highland Ave to lucid Ave - widen from 2 to 3 Idries including d new traffic lane ur edcn dircuI un new sidewalk;. sidewalk widening. tratfic signal upgrade, dnd IntorConnection RTP PACE NO A f, RAS (TA 7-45) I ST TOTAL C;USf $?0,000 R:TP ttansNPt L TtansNet Lsl TOTAL PRIOR 52.000 $2 000 $).092 S1.092 $974 00(09 09110 10(11 11112 12113 PF RW CON ?2 WO $1 092 5174 $200 $200 S/00 $200 $9/4 TOTAL $4.066 $3,092 $174 $200 $200 $200 5200 $4.066 DRAFT 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region din $000s) MPn II) NC03 Capacity Status NCI RTIP tt rill I Streot Recurfartny I'iu(t�t Exempt (;ateyory. Safcly Pavement resurfacing and/or rehanddahon DESCRIPTION Harding Avenue (north-er,d to W. 30th St ). Van Ness Avenuc(Leonard 51 to 200'south). E 31st St (R Ave W D Ave . Itoosevelt Avenue (north -end to W 181h St ). Thelma Way (4111 St to E 5th SI ). r Avenue (E 20th St to Cul-de-sac). B Avenue (r 7th St to E 8th St ). r 5th beet (D Ave to Hryhl.and Ave) 171h St (N Ave to I'alrn Ave ). F Avenue (E 4th St to E bth S1 ). I anuddn Avenue (Division St to Melrose S1 ), liutden Dr (E 71h St to I 8th St ), E 1st St (rnct,d Ave to Clairmont Ave ). r ?4th St (tJ C )tivd to D Ave ) E 2nd ;t (Valva Ave to Claimnnnt Ave ) W ltlth St (Wilson Ave to Harding Ave ). r "lui st (Valvd Ave. to Clairmont Ave ). W 16th Street (I Ioover Ave to N C Blvd ). Prospect Aver uC (E 20th 51 to L 22nd St ). r 2111h Sl (J Ave to K Ave ) U Avenue (E 15t St to r 4th St) I'ataursc Dr (PCC Folk in Road to E loth St ) L. 5th SL (N C Rlvd to I) Ave ), E Sth St (0 Ave to It Ave i N Avenue ((: 16th St to r 18th St ). E 15th St (I liphland Ave to K Ave ). G Ave (F ?1st St to E 22nd 5t I. I. i th St (Patin Ave to O Ave ). F Ave (r 26th St to t= 2tith St ). F 18th 51 (Highland Ave to I':rlrn Ave ). Valva Ave (Melrose St to E 3rd St) I'dtadle Dnve (E 8th St to I oil( u, Rudd) Salot Street (E , th St to E 8th 'tt ). I Ave (E 13th St to F 15th St) Melrose S1 (Valva Ave to Clairmont Ave ) V Aver (E ith SI to I tith 51 ). C Ave (E 18th St to E 22nd St ). Terry I ane (IL Ave to East Cut de sac), W 11th St (I hover Ave to N.0 Blvd ) 40 W 20th St (Wilson Ave to HarJrny Ave ) E 1(ah St (14 Ave lv Palm Avn t.L 281h St (K Avc to 1 Ave ) - piovtde roadway rehandd:,l:un (ynnd,ny and naw,v nv,'rtay 1 inch ?hick or y,eakr)an i repair nt concretc sidewalks. curh and yuttur s, TOTAL PRIOR EST TOTAI COSI $1t3n9(1 08,09 09/10 10111 11/12 12/13 Se. 014 $3 514 $ 4.500 S5 313 55.:113 33.263 TOTAL S300 $300 $:300 S100 5300 4500 $142 5518 $i 005 51.5'J8 $18,090 S8,827 $4,800 $442 $818 $t,305 $1898 PE RW CON 35 014 Sa 500 $5.'313 53 263 $18 090 National City, City of DI2AF T 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) AMPO ID NC(kl Capacity St.atne NCI 1IT1 h I'athc Signal "ade Exempt Category Other Intersection sglnaloatInn protects DESCRIPTION National City Buulevdid (1st Strcct to 3' In Street Plaza Boulevard (Rooscvclt Avcnuc to Paradise Valley Road) Euclid Avenue (Division Street to Sweetwater (toad). dOtlr Street (National City Boulevard to Fuchd Avenue) Hdibur Drive (Civic Center Drive to 8th Sheet) Highland Avenue (Division Street 10 .lOth Street). ttlh Stieu (Harbor Drive t0 Paradise Valley (toad). Drw;'on Street (Highland Aveniie to I larhrson Avenue.) DD Avenue (8th Street to 30th :street). Palm Avenue (Division Street to 111th Street), 18th Street (National City Boulevard to it Avenue). 24(1h Street (Tidelands Avenue to Ihghland Avenue). Swuetwatec kudd (Eu':hr1 Avenue to Plaza but ad Center Way) rnstatl andlor upgrade trdthc signals FST TOTAI C01;1 IOTAL PRIOR 06,09 09110 10111 11/I2 12113 RTIP:; 0800 $1,JJfS` PE RW CON L vc.,I Funds t r.v,Hrt t-- S50 $51) 5,n S1.515- S t015 — $1fl0 SIO0 $100 — $TOr1 SOU - 3I 5i5 TOTAL 51.565 51.065 S100 5100 5100 S100 5100 S1.5G5 1..ryt 41 MonUar Jung 'f eUPtl tit) City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT AEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting the 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program of Projects (RTIP) for National City for fiscal year 2009 through 2013 PREPARED BY Alberto Griego DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4386 EXPLANATION An item has been included in tonight's Council Agenda to hold the public hearing to adopt the RTIP. The current RTIP will be adopted by SANDAG on July 25, 2008 and covers the five-year period Fiscal Years 2009 through 2013. A new adopted RTIP by the City of National City is required for these fiscal years prior to adoption of the agencies five year program by SANDAG. The attached 2008 RTIP and TransNet Project List is National City's Five year program of proposed major Capital Improvement Projects. See attached. Staff requests that the City Council adopt the 2008 RTIP. Environmental Review X NIA MIS Approval Financial Statement N/A Approved By: Finance Director Account No. TAFF RECOMMENTION Ado t Five Ye .r IP an 1- ► st4et jects. D / COMMIS N RECOMI11ENOATIL> N/A ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No. 1. Resolution 2. TransNet Project List for National City resol A•200 (Rev 7/03) • RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY NATIONAL CITY ADOPTING THE 2008 REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OF PROJECTS (RTIP) FOR NATIONAL CITY FOR FISCAL YEARS 2009 THROUGH 2013 WHEREAS, on November 4 2004, the voters of San Diego County approved the San Diego Transportation Improvement Program Ordinance and Expenditure Plan (04-01) extension, and WHEREAS, the TransNet Extension Ordinance provides that SANDAG, acting as the Regional Transportation Commission, shall approve a multi -year program of projects submitted by local jurisdictions identifying those transportation project eligible to use transportation sales tax (TransNet) funds; and WHEREAS, the City of National City was provided with an estimate of annual TransNet local street and road revenues for fiscal years 2009 through 2013; and WHEREAS, the City of National City has held a clearly noticed public hearing regarding its proposed list of projects prior to approval by the City Council, in accordance with Section 5(A) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance and Rule 7 of SANDAG Board Policy 31. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City as follows: 1. That pursuant to Section 2 (C) (1) of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the of the City of National City certifies that no more than 30 percent of its annual revenues shall be spent on maintenance -related projects. 2. That pursuant to Section 4(E)(3) of the TransNet Ordinance, the City of National City certifies that all new projects, or major reconstruction projects, funded by TransNet revenues shall accommodate travel by pedestrians and bicyclists, and that any exception to this requirement permitted under the Ordinance and proposed shall be clearly noticed as part of the City of National City's public hearing process. 3. That pursuant to Section 8 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of National City certifies that the required minimum annual level of discretionary funds to be expended for street and road purposes will be met throughout the 5-year period consistent with the most recent Maintenance of Effort Requirements adopted by SANDAG. 4. That pursuant to Section 9a of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of National City certifies that it will extract $2,000 from the private sector for each newly constructed residential housing unit in that jurisdiction to comply with the provisions of the Regional Transportation Congestion Improvement Program (RTCIP). 5. That pursuant to Section 13 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of National City certifies that it has established a separate Transportation Improvement Account for TransNet revenues with interest earned expended only for those purposes for which the funds were allocated. Resolution No. 2008 - July 15, 2008 Page 2 6. That pursuant to Section 13 of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, the City of National City certifies that each project of $250,000 or more will be clearly designated during construction with TransNet project funding identification signs. 7. That the City of National City does hereby certify that all other applicable provisions of the TransNet Extension Ordinance, and SANDAG Board Policy 31 have been met. 8. That the City of National City agrees to indemnify, hold harmless and defend SANDAG, the San Diego County Regional Transportation Commission, and all officers and employees thereof against all causes of action or claims arising from the negligence of the City of National City and related to local TransNet funded projects undertaken by the City of National City. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H. Eiser, III City Attorney Ron Morrison, Mayor DRAFT 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) National Cuty, City of MPO ID NC01 Capacity Stelus CI It III' 0)3.00 TI rl I- f'Id/a Blvd Wid•_ning DESCRIPTION Plaza Blvd trom I lighland Ave lu Euclid Ave - widen Iron) 2 to 3 lanes including a new traffic lane u1 eactl dupchnn. new sidewalks. sidewalk widening. IiaffIC signal upgrades and interconnection If I I' I'AGL NO A-6 HAS (IAi 45) TO 1 AI. PRIOR ti`.>I I O IAI COS I 520000 08/09 091t0 10111 11112 12/13 PE RW CON rsn' Irdii t•ict • I. Iten•,Nct L51 TOTAL S2.000 $2 n00 SIA47 St092 $974 5! 000 $1.092 5174 5200 $200 $200 5200 $974 54.066 $3.092 5174 5200 $200 5200 5200 54,066 DRAFT 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) MI'011) NC03 TI I LE Sbeel Hesuttacrng Protect Capacity Status' NCI RTII' u 08.00 Exempt Category Safety • 1'evenlr-nt resurfacing anJwr rehabilitation 1)1 SCRIPTION Harding Avenue (north -end 1n W 30th St ). Van Ness Avenue(' nnnard SI to 200'soulh). F 31st St IB Av: to D Ave . Roosevelt Avenue (north•end to W 181h SI ). Thelma Way (4th St to 1 5th St ). E Avenue (E 20t11 St to Cul-de-sac). 11 Avenue (E 7th St W E 8111 St ). E 5th Street (D Ave to Highland Ave ). E 17th St (N Ave to t'alm Ave ). E Avenue (E. 4th St to E 8th St ), I anoit:ln Avenue (Division St to Melrose St ). Burden Ur (1 71h St to E 8th St ). E 1st St (Euclid Ave to Clairmont Ave ). I 24th St (N C Mid to D Avc) E 2nd St (Valve Ave to Clairmont Ave ) W 19th St (Wilson Ave to Hardily Ave 1 1 1rd .`;t (VJIva Ave to CImul.unt Ave ). W 16th Street (Hoover Ave to N C fllvd ). Propc�t Avenue (f 20th St to f 22nd St ). E. 28th St (J Ave to K Ave ), U Av nue (E 1st St to E 4th St ). Paiedise Ur (1'C(; 1 irk in Road to E 10th St ) E 51tr St (N C Rlvd to D Ave ). E 51h ;;t (0 Ave to R Ave ). N Avemre SE t('1ta St to E 18th S1 ). E 151h St (f flghtand live to K Ave ), Cr Ave (L 21 st St to E 22nd St j. E /th SI (Palm Ave to 0 Ave ). I- Ave (E 28th St to E 28th St ). E 18u1 St (Hrght.:Inrd Ave to Patin Ave ) Valve Ave (Melrose St to E 3rd St ). Paradise Dove (E 8th St to l-uik In Road) Salot Stied (E 701 St to E 8th t;1 ). I Ave (E 13th SI to E 151h tit ). Melrose St (Valve Ave to Clairmont Ave ). V Ave (E nth St to L 8th SI ) C Ave (E 18th St to E 22nd SI ). Terry Lane (R Ave to East Col de sac). W 1 lth SI (Hoover Ave to N C f11vd ). 40 W 2011i St (Wilson Ave to I larding Ave ). E 16th `.;t (N Ave to P.Irn Ave ).E 28t)1 Sr (K Ave to l Ave ) piovide Iuadway rehabilitation (grinding and new ov0rlay 1 inch th;rk or groat,' kind repair of concrete sidewalks. curb and gutters LSI IOTA' COST Lur.ull units Tr.uaNr-I CI' Iran, 1,10A I rar, Itit TOTAL PRIOR $18090 08109 09110 10111 11112 12113 SS 014 S4 ',tin SS :113 S3 263 $3.514 $ 5..113 WI At r 5115.090 5300 $100 YJ00 S300 5300 $4 500 $142 $`r18 51005 S1.598 PE HW CON 55014 $4.500 SS 13 S.32(63 58,827 $4 800 S442 $818 11.305 $1.898 S18.090 National City City of DRAFT 2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program San Diego Region (in $000s) 1v11'U IU H 04 Capacity Stdtus NCI TITLE Dar, Signal InstaHitlpr)rade Exempt Category Other - Intersection srynati7ahnn projects RTII' n 08-01) DESCRIPTION National C ly Boulevard (1st Street to 35th Street). PI37a Boulevard (Roosevelt Avenue to Paradise Valley Road). Euclid Avenue (Division Street to Sweetwater Road). 30th Street (National City Buutevard to Fucl d Avenue). Harbor Drive (Civic Center Dnve to 8t11 Street) Ilighl3nd Avenue (Division Street to 30th Street), ftth Street (Harbor Drive to Paradise Valley Road). Division Street (Highland Avenue to Harbison Avenun) on Avenue (8th Street to 30th Street) Palm Avenue (Division Street 10 18th Street). 18th Street (National City Boulevard to EuLtd Avenue) 74th Street (Tidelands AvenuP to flighla id Avenue) Sweetwater Road (Euclid Avenun to Plaza Bur ita Center Way) • install dnd.'or upgrade traffic ,iynals EST TOTAL COSI g1 n�i, TOTAL PRIOR 08(09 09110 10111 11112 12113 PE RW CON Local funds S50 S50 S50 1i.nisNtt •t — — S1T,1 `r St.ttY $100 3100 — $100 $ 100 - St00 — — — It 515' TOTAL S1,565 $1,065 5100 5100 5100 5100 $100 Paco 43 $1 S65 r. ii,a. y Jun.•9 905A l i4 City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 1 S. 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 22 ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CfIY COUNCIL OF THE CI' Y OF NATIONAI. ('II'Y ADOPTING I HE CITY OF NA'I IONAL CITY'S 2008 USER FEE SCIIEDULE FOR USER FEES WI l'HIN THE CITY PREPARED BY q DEPARTMENT Brad Raulston Py� r\`' City Manager's Office EXPLANATION The City has completed a review of all user Ices collected independently by Maximus with City departments and has tonnulated the recommended lire user fee schedule for consideration hy the City Council. Environmental Review X N/A Financial Statement User Fees arc determined to he cost recovery for services provided. Approved By: Finance Director Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adapt the 2008 User Fee Schedule recommended hy the U tt I)epatunents. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N' A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. Recommended Fee Schedule A-200 (9/99) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADOPTING THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY 2008 FEE SCHEDULE FOR USER FEES WITHIN THE CITY WHEREAS, user fees have been recognized as a necessary and effective method of generating those revenues required to provide municipal services and facilities; and WHEREAS, after a considerable amount of study and receipt of staff input, the City Council determined that adjustments in user fees in many instances are necessary to close the gap between current fees and actual service costs, in order to reduce general fund subsidies so that such funds may be redirected to provide services which benefit the community as a whole; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held to consider adjustments 10 City user fees at the regularly scheduled City Council meeting of July 1, 2008. notice of which hearing was published according to law in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. At said hearing, the City Council considered oral and written presentations of the City Council, City staff, and members of the public. NOW THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of National City that beginning July 1, 2008, the fees designated in the aforementioned City of National City Fee Schedule shall be collected for all services described in said Schedule, and that all fees previously established for said services shall be superseded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that beginning July 1, 2008, the fees designated in the aforementioned City of National City Fee Schedule shall be collected for all services described in said Schedule, and that all fees previously established for said services shall be superseded PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. ATTEST: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: George H Eiser, III City Attorney Ron Morrison, Mayor City of National City 2008 User Fee Schedule 1 CITY CLEHK Fee Number Fee Name Fee CC 1 Audio Tape City Tape $8.00 CC 2 Tape provided by requestor $4.00 CC 3 Certified Copy $10 50 CC 4 Copies 8x11 standard per page $1.00 $0 15 CC 5 8x11 color per page $1.00 $0.25 CC 6 Oversized standard per page $1.00 $0.50 CC 7 Oversized color per page $1.00 $1 00 2 Fee Number FN 1 LN 2 EN 3 FN 4 EN 5 EN 6 EN 7 EN 8 EN 9 EN 10 EN 11 EN 12 EN 13 EN 14 EN 15 FN 16 EN 17 EN 18 EN 19 ENGINEERING Fee Name Record of Survey Encroachment Agreement Special Driveway Permit Easement Check Lot Line Adjustment Sidewalk. Driveway, Curb Permit Deferral Sewer Permit Flood Hazard Area Permit Construction Permit Annual Parking District Renewal I raffic Impact Study Review <3000 vehicles Traffic Impact Study Review >3000 vehicles Plan Copy Service Engineering Compliance Fee Investigation Fee Utility Company Permit f ee 1 raffic Control Plan Check 'PRA / Copies Subject 3 f ee $796.00 $490.00 $368.00 $796.00 $1,259.00 $29/.00 $670.00 $381.00 $201.00 $396.00 $35 00 $3.416.00 $6,833 00 $21.00 $553.00 $170.00 $512 00 $4 76.00 to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) Fee Number FDi FD2 FD 3 ID4 FD 5 I D 6 FD 7 FD 8 FD 9 FD 10 FL) 11 FD 12 FD 13 FD 14 FD 15 FD 16 10 1/ FD 18 I1)19 FD 20 FD 21 FD2? FD 23 FD 24 FI)25 FD26 FD 27 FD 28 FD 29 FD 30 FD31 FD 32 FD 33 FD 34 FL) 35 FD 36 FD37 FD 38 FD 39 ID40 FD 41 I D 42 FD 43 ID44 FD 45 FD 46 ID41 FIRE Fee Name FD Pln Chk Fire Sprinkler Improvement < 20000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 20001 - 45000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 45001 - 80000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 80001 - 100000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Improvement 100001 Fire Sprinkler New < 20000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler New 20001 - 45000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler New 45001 - 80000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler Ncw 80001 - 100000 sq ft Fire Sprinkler New 100001+ Fire Alarm New < 20000 sq If Fire Alarm New 20001 45000 sq ft Fire Alarm New 45001 - 80000 sq ft Fire Alann New 80001 - 100000 sq 11 Fire Alarm New 100001+ Fire I'roteclion Systems FD TI JP Canopy 0 400 sq ft Canopy 401 500 sq If Canopy 501-600 sq ft Canopy 601.700 cq It Canopy 700+ Hydrant Tent 0 200 sq ft Tent 201+ sq ft Candles Open Flame Assembly Area Hot Work Carnivals and Fairs Install Tank Aboveground Tank Underground Removal 1 ank Aboveground Tank Underground Soil Vapor Extraction Install Underground Piping on underground tank Pyro Chem Fireworks Barge Loading Fireworks Display Misr: Hazardous Occupancy Reinspection After 3 Malicious False Alarm False Alarm State Hequest Week Abatemenl Inspection Noncompliance Notice Hourly Rate Standard Standby per hour After Hours 2 hr min Additional hour per hour 'PHA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk' Fee $/00 00 $900.00 $1, 300.00 $1.800.00 $2, 500.00 $995 00 $1,004.00 $1.807.00 $2,510.00 $3,213.00 $800.00 $1,000.00 $1.300.00 $1,500.00 S2.000.00 $ 703.00 $0.00 $250 00 $300.00 $350.00 $400 00 $100.00 $200.00 $400.00 $100.00 $500.00 $500 00 $1.004.00 $1.004.00 $ 703.00 $903.00 $552.00 $552.00 $502 00 $451.00 $502 00 $451.00 $251.00 $351.00 $803.00 $301.00 $251.00 $401.00 S200.00 $602 00 $301.00 s schedule) POLICE Fire Number Fee Name Fee PD 1 ARO Dog License. 1 year unaltered $13 00 PD 2 Dog License. 1 year altered $13.00 PD 3 Dog license. 2 year unaltered $13.00 PD 4 Dog License. 2 year altered $13 00 PD 5 Dog license, 3 year unaltered $13.00 PD 6 flog License. 3 year altered $13 00 PD 7 Dog License Replacement $13.00 PD 8 Jurisdictional Transfer of Dog License $13.00 PD 9 Animal Quarantine Release $75.00 PD 10 Animal Relinquishment $50.00 PD 11 Dead Animal Pickup $6.00 PD 12 I ranquilizer $76.00 PD 13 Guard Dog Permit $76.00 PD 14 Non -Allowed Animal Permit $76.00 PD 15 Service Alarm Permit $30.00 l'D 16 Second Response Permit (loud music. parties) $153.00 False Alarm Response (NCMC 10.45.130) PD 1/ 3rd $50 00 PD 18 4th $75.00 PD 19 51h $100 00 PD 20 6th $156.00 PD 21 /th i $200.00 PD 22 Special Events Profit $103.00 PD 23 Special Events - Nonprofit $103.00 PD 24 Parking.11 raltic Control • Profit $56.00 PD 25 Parking/Traffic Control - Nonprofit $56.00 PD 26 Fingerprinting - DELETE $0.00 PD 27 Negligent Vehicle Impound/Helease $124.00 PD 28 Ticket Sign Off $0 00 PD 29 Vehicle Repossession $8.00 PD 30 VIN Verification $77.00 PD 31 Research Hourly Rate $60 00 PD 32 Admin/Doc Subpoena Admin Fee $42.00 PD 33 Deposit Disposition of Subpoena (refundable or recover - $150.00 PD 34 Accident Report ($0 for person involved) $13.00 PD 35 Crime Report ($0 for person involved) $13.00 PD 36 Request for Report ($0 for person involved) $13.00 PD 37 Record Check/Clearance Letter/No Record $20.00 PD 38 Photographs - CDs $19.00 PD 39 33mm 1st photo $5.00 PD 40 Additional photos $2.00 PD 41 'PHA / Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) hi PLANNING Fee Number Fee Name Fee PL 1 Dev Annexation $9.940.00 PL 2 Approval of Plans $7,890 00 PL 3 Coastal Dev Permit w/ Pub Hrg $9.940.00 PL 4 Coastal Dev Permit w/o Pub Hrg $8.730.00 PI. 5 Code Amendment $9,940.00 PL 6 Conditional Use Permit $7,890.00 PL 7 Consistency Review $10,130 00 PL 8 General Plan Amendment $9.940.00 PL 9 Initial Study $1.270.00 PL 10 Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment $9,940 00 PL 11 Planned Development Permit $7,890.00 PL 12 Planned Unit Development $8.340.00 PL 13 Preliminary Site Plan Review $2,840 00 PL 14 Request to Initiate General/Specific Plan Amendment $6.430.00 PL 15 Specific Plan $9,940.00 PL 16 Specific Plan Amendment $7,740.00 PL 17 Substantial Conformance, Council, Commission $5,660.00 PL 18 Substantial Conformance. Staff Review $3.690.00 PL 19 Lune Extension w/ Public Hrg (CUP, PD, PUD, Variance) $5, /10 00 PL 20 Time Extension w/o Public Hrg (CUP, PD, PUD, Variance) $4,990.00 PL 21 Variance $8,020.00 PL 22 Variance SFR Owner-Occ $8.020.00 PL 23 Tone Boundary Determination $8.020.00 PL 24 Zone Map Change $9,940.00 PL 25 Doc Design Guidelines $10 00 PL 20 General Plan Map/ Base Maps $40.00 PL 21 General Plan Text $10.00 PL 28 Housing Element $10.00 PL 29 Land Use Code $10 00 PL 30 Landscape Guidelines $10.00 PL 31 Local Coastal Plan $10.00 PL 32 National City Overview $10.00 PI. 33 Planning Commission Agendas (Annual Subscription) $0.00 PL 34 Subdivision Ordinance $10.00 PL 35 Toning Map $10.00 PL 36 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) $13.410.00 PL 37 Misc Appeal, Project Processing (non• refundable) Protect $3.710.00 PL 38 Appeal, Site Pfan Review Denial of Owner Occupied SF D $3. / 10.00 Pt. 39 I listoric Site Designation $5.050.00 PL 40 Horne Occupation Permit $220.00 P1 41 Interpretations $5,800.00 PL 42 Large Family Day Care $310.00 PL 43 Zoning/ Rebuild Letters $220.00 PL 44 Signs Ranners . Administrative Fee $40.00 I'I. 45 Uanners, Processing (reimbursable) $1.9/500 PL 46 Modification, Nonstructural $40.00 PL 47 Painted Wall Sign $40.00 PL 48 Hetace Sign $40 00 PL 49 Subdivision Certificate of Compliance $2.690 00 PL 50 lot Merger $2,690.00 PI 51 Street Vacation $8.900.00 PL 52 Street Vacation Inttiatia1ion $4.040 00 PL 53 Tentative Parcel Map $6,500.00 Pl 54 Tentative Subdivision Map $6,500.00 I-'L 55 Time Extension, Tentative Parcel Map $9,940 00 PL 56 Time Lxtension, Tentative Subdivision $3,840.00 PI. 57 Research Fee $180.00 PL 58 'PRA ! Copies Subject to City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) F INANCE Fce Number Fee Name Fee FIN 1 Admin Business License Admin Application $21.50 FIN 2 Business License Admin Renewal $10.50 FIN 3 Pet License Admin Fce per animal $17.50 FIN 4 Business Business License Duplicate $10 00 FIN 5 Business License Name Change $11.00 FIN 6 Non Compliant Audit $15.00 FIN / Business License Change of Location within City $50.00 FIN 8 New Business License Processing $50.00 FIN 9 Used Dealer State License Processing $50.00 FIN 10 Identification Card $10.00 FIN 11 Certtlrcation of Subpoena Copies $10.00 FIN 12 Copies Certified Business License List $50 00 FIN 13 Budget Booklet $50.00 FIN 14 CAFR Booklet $50.00 FIN 15 Return Check 1 10 days $25.00 FIN 16 Misc 10+ days $35.00 I IN 17 each additional 10 days $10.00 FIN 18 Record Search $2.00 FIN 18 over 10 minutes per hour $15.00 FIN 20 Inspection Fee (TUP's, field) $50.00 FIN 21 Garage Sales Permit $5.00 FIN 2? Business t icense Appeals $25 00 FIN 23 Extension of Going out of Business Sale $50.00 1 IN 24 'PRA 1 Copies Subject to City Copy Fce (see Clerk's schedule) I axi Cab Fee Scttedulc Refer to resolution 2004 229 FIN 25 Admin Annual Fee per vehicle $100 00 FIN 26 Application Permit App FIN 27 Plus each permit in excess of one { IN ?8 Plus additional charge if applicant is a corporation FIN 29 Licensed to operate in NC by MTDB as of 12-7-04 Operational Request FIN 30 Transfer clearance FIN 31 Jitney route change or additional route request FIN 32 Text stand request or jitney zone if installed FIN 33 Fictitious name change FIN 34 Plus per vehicle FIN 35 Color scheme and radio service change FIN 36 Plus per vehicle FIN 37 Rate of fare filing per company FIN 38 Plus per vehicle FIN 39 Replacement vehicle (more than one per permit per year) FIN 40 Add corporation officer (each) l IN 41 Addition, deletion, or change of stockholder (each) Radio Services FIN 42 Initial review of new service organlLalion FIN 43 Name Change $3.000.00 $300 00 $500.00 $0.00 $200.00 $250 00 $250.00 $100.00 $10.00 $100 00 $10.00 $100.00 $10.00 $50.00 $100.00 $100.00 $150.00 $50 00 Medallion/Permit Reassignment FIN 44 Reassigning a permit from one existing vehicle to a different existing vehicle in the same company (DBA) or to a different existing company of the same permit number FIN 45 This does not apply to the replacement of an existing vehicle i.e., when all permits are reassgned from an existing vehicle Replacement vehicle fees remain as stated in 3.7 Permit transfer request from one person to a different person. same as lee item 3.1 Plus. transferee pays fee schedule rtem 2 (application tee) and item 1 (initial reg fee) based on number of vehicles Reinstatement of a revocation or Suspension FIN 46 Fee tor an appeal Irom revocation, suspension, or related adverse action. refundable if appeal is meritorious $50 00 $200.00 $300.00 ee Number CS I CS 2 CS 3 CS 4 CS 5 CS 6 CS 7 CS 8 CS 9 CS 10 CS 11 CS 12 CS 13 CS 14 CS 15 CS 16 CS 17 CS 18 CS 19 CS 20 CS 21 CS 22 CS 23 CS 24 CS 25 CS 26 GS 27 CS 28 CS 29 CS 30 CS 31 CS 32 CS 32 CS 33 CS 34 CS 35 CS 36 CS 37 CS 38 CS 39 CS 40 CS 41 CS 42 COMMUNII Y SFRVICES 1 ee Name Fec Athletic Field Lights - Resident per hour Athletic Field Lights Non Res per hour Athletic Field/Facility User Fee - Non-resident per hour Athletic Field/Facility Maintenance Fee Non resident pe Tiny Tots Resident l my Tots Non Resident Contractual Classes Revenue Sharing Instructor 70% City 30% Street Tree Removal per tree- beautification Street Tree Removal per tree -essential Recreation Swimming Recreation Swimming 0-12 yrs Recreation Swimming Seniors Recreation Swimming Non Res Children/Seniors Learn to Swim Program- Resident Learn to Swim Program Non Resident Adult Noon Swim Adult Nun Swim Club Swim Team Root Rental tee Swim Pass (30 entries) Swim Pass (30 entries)- Children 0-12 Swim Pass (30 entries) Seniors over 65 Swim Pass (30 entries)- Nonresident seniors& children Summer Programs and Camps Individual Children's Parties Air ,lumps Lifeguard Fee (Applied to Schools) Lifeguard lee Nonresident Seniors - Resident Per hour, per guard per month per hour $10.00 $20 00 $50.00 $10.00 $40.00 $60.00 $295.00 $65.00 $3.00 $1.00 $1.50 $2 00 $25.00 $40.00 $3 00 $1.50 $300.00 $35 00 $60.00 $20 00 $30 00 $45.00 25% of cost 100% of cost $25.00 $20 00 $30.00 Non -Resident Recreation Class, Program, Sport Particip: $10.00 'PRA / Copies Subject 10 City Copy Fee (see Clerk's schedule) I ennis Court Rental Fee Non-Resident(Leagt per hour MI K FACILITY Building Use fee (nonrefundable, non waivable) FINING South Rooin per hour North Roor under 150 people per hour tinder 220 people per hour Fntirc Hall per hour DANCE - South Roo' under 100 people per Itorrr under 160 people per hour North Roor under 300 people per hour under 475 people per hour Entire Hall per hour KIMt3A1 SFNIOR CLN I FR /0 $50.00 $S0 00 $23 45 S70.36 $87.97 $117.26 $23 4S $29.32 $70.36 $87.95 $11/26 CS 43 Under 150 people per hour $70.36 CS 44 Over 150 people per hour $87.97 CASA DF SALUD per hour $23 45 CS 45 Kitchen per hour $10.00 CS 46 deposit $60.00 CS 47 Custodial' deposit $100 00 CS 48 per hour $22 00 CS 49 $35.00 ' Custodial charge shall be charged on the following estimated attendance 1 100 person 101 157 158 300 301 - 472 4 73 - 630 thr set up and 1 hr clean up 2hr set up and 2 hr clean up 3hr set up and 3 hr clean up 4hr set up and 4 hr clean up 5hr set up and 5 hr clean up // City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction I ees 'LAN CHECK & INSPECTION FEES COMf3INI 1) IIIC Pro p•t1 Size Cl.r.•. __ IBC Occupa yType Iton•.1101d A t - ASsemply-Fixed S.-.hurl— — - - 1 00U Rleater Curk.ed lall 5000 1 n 000 50.000 _ 100000 A 2 — A•, ;a' nb -food & Drink - _- 1.010 • _Restaleant loydl:IOb. H.it 3000 -- — - 10000 20 000 50 000 _---- -- _ 1000UU 4 1 Assemhly-WJrshrp Anurl''1111111 1 000 Areycte Churn, Cnmmunty 11.111 - - 5000 100nn _- .. - 20000 50000 . _ -- -- 1110 000 A -1 A'.•-ud'ly 10. t,y• ;.pPI Vw:wutt) 1 06)0 Alen) Sk.,I, Hot). but.. Cr+tl1 5 (WU 10 000 10 0UG 500W 100.000 400 1 0011 4 01)0 anon t0 UU I Anovcmen% Ito n o••.., dnt '�6' 101311 1000 5000 01000 ft 8ustn�•zc-l.lnm (1'1t11.,4•r1I _ 5UJ - _ — - - — 1 000 2 000 500.1 16/ 000 0 Rus,rleSS-I,. i:5.•. - -- •,UJ _ 2.oU) 5nru 10 OW 25.000 _ fil l M41 11 ©Jto-roe 1'..of. --:,wp4d O211ca ...I n0fl UUI -- ' - --', - IOOW 20 00U 10 000 100000 15MN1 in'fill L1u)UU 750003 I: - HIIInp. or y to ,unl lutfu 0,.•2606.O1'. 1 7.11 ', uau 12 503) -' — _-' -- 250•30 40 000 Inn Construction Type Corlstrwlon Type IA. Ili UA. U8. 111A, WO, Constnrcbnn Iype VA. VR Oasc Cost Cns1 i0( R.I'.c Cost Cost for 8..s., err.' Cost for @ Each f4 Each @ Facie Threshold Additional Thresh04d Additional 1hresho)d Addrt.00jl St,r, 100 sf • Size 100 .) • Sire 100 s1 • S11113 S/911/5 S7505 S60?G40 _ $1084 _ $51n11, 04,.307 1/3 0t;U0 SS 255 $60 8813 -Si !US _S4R /06, S'196.) $51 8700 $0 AA) _ 141 1811 56,040 S.Y1 s4Ui 01•,547 _ 5375267 S17610 $41 7/.'! 130095 5.250176 Sit. 400 $44 4600 S22.000 $ 37 031.10 _ S 1 / 1471 - 121 640r1 5.48.630 148 (i300 040 575 5.40 5250 13i.4/U $37 4700 0.4.206 - 5107 3190 5.3.9110 $R1 4115 S7.8114 SII SM_10_ SS :,84 S`Ill 3640 $7.150 S81 9700 $5.726 $65.5760 $13..'1)7 S/01/641 S11,256 $584U0U _ 43 nos _ 0.467840 $70,525 5.502240 11/ 104 14) 8533 1136134 _ 2134827 415 512 5.600720 Si`+W.d00 ) $50004/3770 S4UU18U S65.578 $85 6280 $54.6Y0 _ 5.54 6900 $41./52 173 75/U 5.3 4/8 1103 5/440 5.3.17 3 1130 3200 S/ 510 $69 0560 $8 0/) 195 1.,9/11_ $8 7211 $70 6600 S) 381 $63 7780 $1)_851 $570440 $ IU:0_9 S15871M, S8.%7 $44_UY1U S_)S4 9 S: ✓, 1406550 $16 79,; S4_I !HW _ Si101/_ S331049 --S34 45/ $$/ 81UU $78 /10 8 71)Uu $/."Mi,i $38'$rq $33/2 -- 0$633710 451 810_ 5.57810(3 14/.7114 $4/7480 S40/4 $1080180 13.351 5.900141 5/683 07) 131/0 _ al 41', _ S99 9300 $(. 954 S'11 /)101l SS.451 $55 6740 SI 3 347 S69 696U _ $I1_I I 1 _ 55D8'M 03 sl t3'34 • Son 464o S7,)_.t 1I 4521%n S 1o.9 N; __ $1)4•ri S13341 S3479.3 SA9%0 $50252n _ 5210/5 1,61 /100 S73 '(8.1 $401630 SSi, 6<9 i4U tl'1tiU $SS n3n SSS caul Sn i 0461 - S4.1 m44) S 1 '.72 $86 2560 S1 )121 $71 8800 $1.040 $5/ :,040_ S/2152 $7/ 5020 $2.4'.) $64 nbon _ SI'X,$ $51 /200 S4.50-1 15/ 1188(1 S ;_7S4 0.48 2400 _ I3110) $1R 1'120 50.820 S37/W0 _ S�bµ1_ Si14567 $4 ',41 $)51851 111 1Sn $48 6120 19 4' 3 _ 540 110C $' S6G S31 4000 $11 U// S1,26800 SI: 550 $43 9000 S 13J14A S35 1200 $1400'-SI 110H_300 S2 AAll _ $11401S0 Si 1h/ S/4/ 2200 S7883 SI0605060 _ So .,07 _5515830u SS l:A, S/U/ 0640 $71186 $6991440 0:058) $..n7.6700 58 /91 54t1, (900 11U 1;8_ 15R10480 _ 11.1 0,I•, $18b 4.! 11 5114,2 1109 /'')6 53; UYb S1,148181') $11 414 S'. I'. Ill Sl, Ill $41 3 /400 $65600 3U3 u'11921) _ 5•,/ 741 ;5/2 410•1 n S•,1 .-1 S4571,780 Si 208 S1.0318650 iiW3_ _ S1310 68/2 S) I113 5I,8/ 9101 1; 315 $974 0400 S-i 113 _ $8I I Joni) $4 d'h) 0049 Jo00 al./dU5 S545044n 5)U 1; 1 S(,s,1. 3/I/U _SA.117 $4306960 Sib 66" 5533 .1bt4U 11'. 555 5444 4733 51/ 444 1355 5787 $34 667 $5/ I !UW $/µ µR', y1>(, MW 1:3 111 $.1R0 Arin0 So; 3.777 /632 2680 $S168'1 S57g 8')00 S4' 1)1 S471 S170 $Inn S131) 917`, 1,.' %.,> S10'I II91R _ S? 705 $d/ 1/511 SJ §)n— S1157/(I0 $1930 i;h, 1/10 S19',1 $771000 _ SO Hiu SN4 µin° S' 150 171 9.)o0 $5.880 $59 9100 SIl 314__ S51 /41111 111095 5.147033 _ SR 4511, 1.358267 $71 I7$ $,4/:,U0 S)' R)1 Sod 3/:1l_ 1111143 $495000 S39 538 S79 61750 — $ 11 181 y,:, 50?5 3/0_b1 , S53 7500 55 101 S125040U _ Sf HI $)U4 7000 _$1101 $Rl 7600 Sin IV1114 9450 18 a (0 $95 /875 St',/''/_ s/6 6_inn $15H;5 S823650 $13729 i1;8611'. $10.583 SA Y10(1 -_ 57411I _ $584050 5700.)3 >4n IVU,( SIP,0,4 $389367 $41(i33 $ 0 •5S0 $34604 1:,004:1 02' 751 $469100 $7681`. 1/6 ?Mt) $64013 Sb1'JI!I, _111710 $112100 SID 339 S318/11) $15 281 $N 1)I6/ S1! 775 $23 2133 S'S 3n3 5;1 !IOU I'll Ud'. S59 >?•.] 1101fid 5.4754nn $41 13,) $57 2000 13$ .11 ' S4 1 555' i'u :..,! S W 8511 Soil ?70 _S 44 4033 55'iS $?R 88'lt $4i 10') i_1/ 93i0 $1211 n. 1, 5459111n 5100 ;/'1 iii./•41 - 58) 591 Sit.)o /0'1 571S:o111/ 1400 51!,641: >3Y/831 5117113 5.31426/ $1 23' i1W 311U S101: Sol ...915 $47, $668740 $2 240 S89 )l•,) 11 8.8) S; 4 231>) 51 4•41 $59 1849 41 354 Sun 4d4J S/ ,',5 SS/ 0/00 S; iv, 545 n•, fin $ti;:, $4I 8360- rS47/.' - SW8533 SI3.'7- S1/8n1, i8 204 V.'''.7060 S6 t33., $4; 410,1 5'• 4(,) S37 00•t0 - al63Ut $,I /17r• ;I:'751 S31ui1., $19 ),12 $408000 1.17-Y 1.111'. 11'. „iolny - 5 3'3 AM City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction Fees PI AN CID .CK & INSPi_CTION FEES COMBINED Construction Type IA, Ifi IBC Class _IBC Occupancy type F F11114.1111•1.4 i41klII, (hx;upancy b• pefson, Iv N.lhl_12011y,r It. r.t Fdor.Ue1o.3 111y 5• children oMei than 2 31, yr.. Factory hdustnal- PAylet 11, K1,... a. ]u1y 41c•,ar.al low 1141310 11. 1 II.gh I IazarJ (;loop 11 I Pose a detonation 1/41a111 11 1 IMJ1111.,:.w1(1' 11 3 1((.•. nL1y .+ 4ll . e l u e nh8./1081 • 11-4 H811111..,.o.I 1 Li2u5,/14 • Poste Meant, n.a,.r,I . 11 5 11r1h H32,e_J Gruup H 5 Swou lurll 32.1I .WKdIrpl R$f) Li InS1112$1, , U _l: • p.•l •a er._nu1n,1. dn1y 111'.0Iu11.u,.8 6•p..., sons. OOo•.1$ nt.4dt01y h11•I:.nlpk` O.303nn,enl 15 ONO Slows Base Cost Cast tun Each Project Size Threshold Additional Ihleshold Sire 100 st' Suo _ S? /8/ $14n S650 2.500 15 599 $129 0000 Constnichon l ype IIA, UR. II1A. WO, IV R.:.' Cost Cost for f4 Each Threshold A,Wdwaal Size 100 st' $2.173 1117 13137S $4 666 $107 5000 On0 _ 1917550 S/.ib3 10.004) 0.69 0650 - $ 11 176 /5.010 178 6450 _ 119434 _ `,U 00U 5n SMS 96$15 810 300 12.427 $1 / 6 6950 S 7 0 2? 1.500 4 571 01608000 $38119 1000 $1984 $110 7450 15.820 ti.u110 --$10 h!/ $IN 5n5n 18.814 15.111.81 11/941 1100 6650 0.14702 30.000 $32.742 _ _ $109 141.10 0.7/ 785 _ 1 500 14.572 $31,2330 03 810 / 5OO $6.446 $70 2'360 SS 322 1, WO S11 /1In $511360 S'1765 30000 0.19688 S3y/480 S18411/ /5.000 $35,775 $459480 S/4813 150 000 5/0 716 1468240 $50 530 2UW 0/ 700 $// 4711 16900 30000 $13390 $694800 5t111.5 20000 $20346 5.52-2000 1169:,5 40 WA/ S30 /38 $115150 525555 100 000 1'4309S 200.000 609, 3OW ,, 00U 12 000 1n009 till WO 00 3 000 6 000 12.900 400481 nU 000 300 1 500 1,000 6 000 1 S n011 .Ill OW 18 824 $13412 S73371 $4298:4 $944320 $ 2.098 $.1 /61 05 601 SS 454 $11581 $15 368 $47 7800 521,140 _ S3213: $108801N1_ _$'.6,1 15 8814 _ $96 1050 S1 81:, 5.8 /08 $74 1150 17 1S0 $11 154 $45 3700 $ 10 062 071 .171 161 4700 0.17 /613 _ $39./o! S641 ?NO 111 115 $1.837 51095450 315.31 03 152 $95 0760 31 02/ 14.578 $77 0280 13 015 16 880 $1064/ S/0 U7.1 1 OW 5 000 10 000 20 000 50 000 100 000 1000 soon 111 (Inn 711 0JU 5.) OW 109 000 1 000 5 000 10 000 m non 50 OW) 140 11011 1 1N111 S UU0 1U U4U '0 0U'3 ',0 000 I' I4) non 13 e58 Sti 900 1/3 /1'A__ $41111 $47 3100 $713 8:,U S1-19. 3075 $1740 $61 3700 13.135 $4/ 5'4i _ 348811 $28 400.1 S/ 045 139 2900 $11.310 $41,7560 15 741 $675OR0 SRR/3 S1ifi /440 $ 16 fi,f, 2!52'S/0 S3115 S67 4280 1S /:,, 510279 0.523,80 10540 S 15 51., $31 2JOU 112 9 SU 174.900 $43 2460 S2J 750 546 514 $46 5240 $ 38 7 /0 0S.378 51271721) S4481 510.481 11156080 18 /19 S 16 7411 $84 07411 S 11 516 1/1 bin $,/ 91)80 S7'051R 011018 1/1 .16411 3.153715 577 700 $77 71.10 .)A /SU SG 478 _ 1147 5901 SS 398 512 3112 5)335150 0.19 119 119.058 $98 2650 115 1'01 S788P4 165 satin S240/0 148 6071 -_ Sill n250 - Son 55.3 Ivll Inn S`N1 moo S:-. 1531 S 1 . 14~ Sn4 11543 S t nos S. U.'n Si S ',not) _ is n..: S 10J'4 a% U4UU S9 Oh _ 313,176 537 432u :13 (32 127 708 S4/ 2800 1710-3.) 15) '16 $51 348J 5:2 %90 Construction Type VA. VI-1 Base -Cara. Cn'.t 1rx FFach S hrestold Additional Soe 100 St' _ $1,8':6 $93 /100 $3.731 S8G ll01N1 5764625 15.883 -- $SS 0541 - $R14 Sb55.s :, $155431 0/ I G3/5 S28 6SS $1489125 $1.0113 SC430i50 _$3A47 509 ib/', 14_656 S11S 42W S/ 0:31 $03 6875 111 261 $9n 0500 521,020 S76 n7/ti $1048 i58 'lnlai _ 14 2.+7 $44 283A 37 817 121 ; 50,3 $1 3 126 - $ 39 i`•00 S21 R50 164 5594 S I IIUU 1570//00 $8932 S1) 5n00 511.564 $779?i1 Stu !1641'S Sil930 S49475n S83 pea SS/ .' ' S1 i99 S51 1000 S2'd,11 1319150 53 7..4 _S11,'1n1 S5 616 S 3?l11, ' 31,151 S3S2333 $1u912 $On 5000 S7 136 SRO 18i5 51,876 S41 ,1. T1 S'Rn5 s? Jots Si Si 125.) 514 111 555;;5J 12:, 568 S'1t 7R lh _S1_725 3") /1)3) 5/ 1M $.,-1190J SJ,U',:' 514 ;067 14 593 1520906 S7090 15'16200 113.349 161 54;5 $7 57? $tin 14)3) _ 6.4005 51 1 n411i1 $6 851 1/5 blh/ 510 144 Si, Utitu Sin 600 $33.,W S.nUin --S)U5OJ5U $3',n:1 $57/ 3409 $b 9, :700200 5108e4 $487567 1164'0 y,9 47011 128011 $64 i 5on 551.8r10 SI7/44h4 $4119 S111 1' _ 16.'••'. Sit m377. al/ S549542 $1975E $r91875 53244S $75 150U S60 170 tinn4`n 5247E 5.• 3 10051 54 : 16 S46 3I4) 5, 750 1;1191) $1e98/, S )•, tuna $ 15 1: / 1-1 ?n:1 S 12J2 $61 1.'IF) 144 04 33 $57 4300 SS/ 3300 1119 1300 $107 2600 $79 8300 $52 3367 S6/ 1109 $72 /60U 120 8220 $46 8640 $.1S 4740 51383:U $30 6320 $11 216:) $5184i5 $ou 3!Uu S 34 800.) .377 11? i $31 54U0 S44 205n 510881h1 131 700'3 5)89s83 S?6 1913 173 18h/ $724000 164 3100 $40 4100 $ln 748.7 S40 9811.9 $44 180U S/30300 $63 3840 $51 3570 S7/ 8'!/ S41 0720 $44 4960 $50 8360 $44 957() S a9120 S20 N533 S 28 8171 s it nl60 S134 .48..r) it/(Wit i G010U $ 38 GJS 3 $47 576,1 151 8000 198 1n 75' S89 htnn S'3, 51U0 $41`v 11 S55 3500 SGO 1200 556076n S506400 -1-1; 1r,nn S74 33,47 S31 S!UU lit /3_ 2 MA), IdUb Im. 1- •4':'i •t: AMA City of National City Building & Safety Dcpaiti; ent Schedule of New Construction Fee, AN (:IIU.CK & INSPECTION FEES COMBINED INC Class INC Oct-ull.0 Typn At Mercant4e- •Mwa l:.rl�lru. Iwo Type Comin>ct>on Type C. w,-Iron 1.00 Type IA, TB KA, NB: NUS, MIT: IV VA, V13 Rase Cost Cost for Rase Cost CAr,1 191 Rau Cost p Each @ Each F3 Project Size Threshold AdMi .. 1 Threshold AddAiowal I tre•Jaohl Threshold Sze 100 st' ?we 100 sl' Size SOO f2824 S 108 3600 $2,J A E75 1040 _f40 1000f1,883 -SW _ $4 99i (3 1/9 TM1 _ 53.178 5000 f/ 3/1 _E/49140 _ S6,145 56247W S491b _ 10.000 111,119 543 5 ,20 Sy 7tirl $36 7733 51413 __. __ 75000 517O57 $61 5600 $14.i IU S/11r10(3 $ t1,/68 'AJO11(3 33.'i.04i E61io840 127.s35 E'.,50/00 172.02R f.l _M.vt. udL .• M14,J1 3U14 drpr0-907 100 14ti/J L1, 11R 7675 13,890 $932 3063 v1.11% 17458450 500 $9.140 $1 019 430U S/ f 71 $849 5250 SG 09'F $b/9 6'llq 1 (10(1 514,245 S)3757W S11,8/I _$Ii 116/1(30 57.497 14914A300 7.0011 S21.820 55321300 $10017 54//441/ $14.413 51419533 S.000 33/O08 5.62757(30 130840 15119/1,0 5.746/2 $4 to 3800 I O.1100 $68.387 Sti83865U 356.0R'3 $5690875 141,191 $4,5911N). f.t 4.4 Occupancy T,naUt Inlpr0v341w501, 50(3 _ $2196 308U)25 518J(J S711918 _ SI 464 $58/I o 7 S(M) _ Sl `)SR $ 78 0600 S 1.2911 Slit, 0513(1 S7 6.37 _ 357 0400 S.UW Sb'JOy _ _ s$60 75!A i_7; 324 _ S50 212' 5.1.9-W _$ 40 1 J00 10 OM $8972 S3U 47UU- /4.Yr $to 10V 15.'N8 111 J1J_! __ /i_UOO 1+4,191 5498900 50004 5.41 s/5(1 5757'. S332603 SO.OW $lu thus S1.3 !S/NI S22.388 344 7713u S1/ 910 S15 R200 11 I Resoenhai-Tren•, ,,) .- - 1.000 S4. 14o 110J 4U1U S1.455 _ iA6 715(1 S2 7W 3WJ J8N13 Rn.ru F,9 Iln. r_.+, lY,tci: Motel.; _ - 5 O(30 :3.735 S70 874.1 S,, 80$ _ 1/9 0900 55.523 SGl 714O• _ IU UU� 513 U_.'fi $fi/lif AO $IO,A55 11Ai!'3W _ SR.6fT4 $g5112_0 _.. 20000 119 793i484WU _ S164y4 S40 3367 113 l9, 337.7693 __ '.000(1 5.14_lld 1579240 578.595 Y1R 7/If0 $/)_8/6 338 u11A/ IW UW Sit 47/fi f63 21fi(3 552,730 j57 /JW 347 )314 $47 1R40 k• 7 �RcvocnpJlI • 3000 $5.9Ys 19'1G t:1t) S1,1M $i1302/3 Sl,bti3 Efifi 4720 Ap .anent 13on nnory l:n o I a.e - - 5 000 $/.900 $91 11,U'- $6,650 S/6 0800 S5 37U SW R840 •1U.l1(� 5+7545 EOS 1600 110.454 SS4 .VM1(1_ 58,363 j434/U0 200(13 3191I61 S46 `13411 S158tt4 - SJU UW IS_I7/O/ 5110560 50.000 $)J UJu 1ss//f(3 _ S:'/,510 146.4800 $L1 U/4 _ f•J/ 1840 100 Oral $611.124 5609740 $'A),7%U S50 //110 540.616 3a)6iW keswl."11, d /,o•u n.nu nl. 2•. Rural 1.O0U _ S 21156 yfA 7210 _ 32 )f30 SIU U1715 $1,'04 5174820 Apartmrn1 TYSrmd.,ry I.,n.•-.I,.,,,• 5.000 Sd W,s $41 N410 54005 - -- _... ..... _ S349IW 3J, 7114 _ $779200 . _ _ - IO.000 $6.7W SJ4 b:N.� S5,/50 $RJ MUG S• IAJU S%.t IWO 7t1.000 f103,{, $178a80 S8,t.38 S1A N71f S6 Y10 111098/ . _ . __ __ _ :,U_WU _ 115/70 $271120 S131OU _ _113:380 S10_480 1180000 __ I00 OW_ S/93/n $796/611 _ 1747J0 1:4 /300 519./84 1197840 R t _17we4Ilr);-4 u;IUm llornc_.. 1.500 1J 16'. j1/U 85/s _51,971 _SU2 JS13 3Jt// 51139050 _ _ _ 7,500 16474 $120 i0:f) _Si 391 S_1006142 14 3l . - SW U71! _. _ 4UO'J f8.281 $I330310 11,90s 31t0)K75 55.574 108u9W 700U54616 51183'150 58.013 S98ti6'!5_ 56411 S/8930J 1000 111934 S33? '4) 3 $7,986 S 1+U 4959 17.9R9_ S/8 300 _ 10.000 al". 9,/ SI',91i15(3 411301 $1)3U12' 510641 S10643100 33 1. U.velNngg-Prod__- _ 1 500 $2447 _ 384 U_JUU_ 57017 1)O UI`A _ $1.6.J7 _SS3(1240 .'d Ma•.irr via,. (rep tal S) - 7_500 S3 2d8 140 0_"A5/_Pt•1 S•I068/5 $1.191 __ SJ! s'ANl ._ _.. 41N10 _ SdOM $5745011 _ aJ. J:,U j47 RJV3 $2.6110 _j SU.3000 11441 - 54 595 548 9450 1 J,tl! 9 3431 7R75 $3063 Sal u!W /UW S55J1 157',/QO Sa 0•IS_ $44rd)(40 _ S3716 S39CAOU _ 10 UW 57 t59 571 S'1M SG Ili _ Sul .f%'M3 Si_70ti 149 Oiu0 0 f Il ve8u11-, �.II•rm.lL'/A ,r••�„P I sUU 1i 416 S15t 6000 $S60U jilt UUINI 17944 7 iW _ SS9:,1 _ �9', Ih50 $4 950 a/9 3UI3 3! QiR fii.3 51013 4.M0 5/ 381 31U9', 1'iU Se 151 _ S'11 2ti71 $t'J1U __ S/3011N1 __, •_ ', nfY3 SR n76 59475',O a- INit S7R 7675 $S 651 j•,.t I/W _ . _ _ - _, /III NI $IO 171 SI12 UOSO SU_u4! - S91 1375 $6.914 j74 b/W 10000 $13/11 513/ 3100 511 f43 )1144750 Si IS4 59154W Ica I<ruJri ai.U-A'; .I .1•.111w- ..) (,t 1' t.•r ;Un ;) 1 ODU $501ri iI+A I4/0 $4 199 1936775 _ f1158 57807) 5OW _ 59:/J S10/ '.440 __ sd lit 199WW 66114 571693eN0 _ r _ , __, IJ 000 SIS I-I'J Ltl i Vu 517!i24 $6143441 110O49 557 7000 70(N9I j7198U a7S /4,NI i14 I50 Sa.t )811 SIS JIU Stt. A76/ 50 000 539 10( 561i M1M1M1U a 4/ Sri $55 l7(le $ n� (X,31 3-0J 741i11 _ I,Iq INl0 $721)4 Sit J1 iJ Ydl /U $n,12/(NI 1i8116 S48 !IbU `e I `:.vagr•1.7..U•� ,•• H ,.'.61 - -1 UW St 4'11 _ $'•R r;4Y1 5' 9V! S4fl R/Sl - . .- _ _ _ S717i $391UW :,,UW 55 N 4/ 550 250�. $4 USA _ _ IJ 003 :f518 S33 5000j41 ri/'AI $1 R91 - - S17 6sd 1 aN 459 $77 9767 20 009 514 1167 .410011 5.18895 >33 bll1J it;, 7443 5230083 $17597 _ 3/J 4U8/ t(NI ,NN1 i35,100 535 70'3J ,/9 7 - •,U $79 ?50(3 523.8•M 11.3130143 Cost for Each Arlritioaal 100 sI' $72 2400 163 5360 i47936n 1/9034/ 141 WOO S44 0560 1.4.1.( MU:i In. /S li/JG/(134 3 38 AM City of National City Building & Safety Department Schedule of New Construction I ees PLAN CHECK & INSI'ECl ION FEES COMBINED Con'tr, .t. In Type Construction Type • IA. 16 11A, NB, MA, I11B, IV Construction Typo VA, VU Outs Cost Cost for Base Cost Cost In, Base C,ra Cecil h,r £ach @ Each (d Each Ili(: Protect Size Tfreshukl Additional Threshold Additional Threshold Additional Class IB4. Occupancy Type Threshold Size 100 sl • Site . 100 st' Size 100 st' S • 1 Storage -Moderate I lazasd Repair Garage 'A0 $2.565 199 4250 11.137 $81 M1.4/ S 1 r II_ _ _ _ S66 7ai1 Motor Vehicles (not , l lazard) 2.500 $4 55 3 187 5900 $3 /94 1/2 991 / _ _ $1 036 _ SSB .tv:f l tl 5.000 56.741 568 5800 55 619 $57 1500 33. 44', 34; 7/U0 10,000 $10,1/7 140236/ 18.477 5339306 56.161 1268144 __ - 260110 Sib 2118 S564500 513511G $47041i $10,805 $376333 50000 140.320 160 6400 525 767 5511 5.133 _ _ S74) 713 $40 426: :,• 2 Storage -tow (Iazard 1.000 $3.331 S61.6620 $2.776_ 151 3650 S7 //I $41 1080 5.000 5.5.798 /53 8440 S4.832 544 8/00 $ 7 665 135 89G0 --_ - - -- 100430 r- 58490 5479960 $1075 115 8100 S_5660 1286640 70.1100 317./90 314128U $1065(1 $/0 106/ SR526 5.160851 50,000 $20,0211r 135 1120 516690 1/9 /611U II 3',? $7'1 40/111 100.000 $31.504 $37 5840 531, 320 $11 320U S 5 056 S15 US4)6 \ 7_ Slorayc • low lL,,nd P. klnl (:,ua'F 1000 $2,953 5560600 _ 12.461 $46 7167 _ $1.068 $37 3733 Open. or 1 1w'h,r.e4 9 oun S5049 S49 2200 N,:179 _ $41 :111, $ 3 461 $12 6111 1000U S7.0.6 SJUU:,UU $b JUU 1313833 S', 104 37b900 20,000 511,547 5223600 15.618 1186333 1/699 114i00;' - - ------ - - - -- - -- S_0,000 $18,750 $11 88041 Si'. 708 526'.6h7 S1/ 1a: $71 ?'11'-- - 100 000 534.1411 /34 1900 116 49/ S7n 441• S// /4.1 S71 7411 • Other Tenant Improvements 60U _ _ $2.3(17 180.0700 51.922 _ _ Sbb719U _ S1 5 Su $51 3800 3.000 54.7713 111 4300 _ S 3 524 553 5250 57 1313 S47 62000 6.000 $6,371 $54 1450 55,.100 $45 7815 54 247 136 2300_ -� ---- -- -- 12.000 S96i? S.1399(10---- S8U2/ S2115196 _ 1,-: 4.'1_ 1776600 - ---- - - -- -- - 30000 515. 790 1452700 S13125 33' /250 S10'.00 13U 18uU 60.000 $23.331 5488850 124443 54071i5 11n554 5325900 SF4LLL BUILOIN(i:i 11 Shell Bldg Uusness-14otess,rnlal 01(,ce Ottrr `:t 4•l T)ud.ta.) 1.000 5.000 10,043(1 10.000 50.000 100.000 1.000 S 1100 10 UUO 20000 50 000 100.0n0 53896 57.233 510,08. 114. 622 $27.456 S51.036 S3 487 5. 174 $19 6JU 116.35 S26.520 S41,455 S83 5800 S /4 0400 156 .3640 $36 1120 147 1600 S51 016n $81 n46(1 3 /, 01:,U S55 1900 133 8 700 $45 810n 140 G6', 53.747 $5.033 S4 t'S 117 ©52 $72 880 547 510 $3 371 it, 074 S9.075 S13633 S22 100 $41 711 S,',o LSJO $62 4'.UO 546'3/00 S 3u 093, S39 3000 $42.S3n0 167 S1/5 1n11U1/1 i4„ u73U $21 1tSU S 78 2250 S41 719', S7 .5: S4 ,32, S'.1 '4 ill 06! S la 104 514024 r:Sn it a.'U s' ?.'U S 10 90,, $11.(160 $1)'I.n Ea,9l add160nal 100 S)•rJM fcr)i. 0, p0rt,dn Ihe'eo up to the next highest pines', 91b: lIMcsbUtd 155 /10U $41 n500 117 5;n $24 U)47 S 31 440') 134 0240 564 n 300 S46 U1U,1 136 U1,u., $22 53UU $30 5800 $12 O/f10 ?A;,y.l1.1U:i. ln, 1 (9 4 :111 AM Fee Number RD 1 [3D 2 BD 3 BD Budding MFPs Fee Name ADMINISTRATIVE FEES Travel and Documentation (standard) (2 trips) Travel and Documentation (each additional trip) Permit Issuance Construction & Demolition Admin Fee MECI IANICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Mechanical Plan Check (subject to hourly rate) Fee $89.00 $59.00 $59.00 $1 18.00 BD 5 A/ C (Residential) $29.00 BD 6 Furnaces (F. A tl.. Floor) $29 00 RD / Heater (Wall) $29.00 BD 8 Appliance Vent / Chimney (Only) $19 00 BD 9 Refridgeration Compressor $59.00 RD 10 Rosier $59.00 BD 11 Chiller $59.00 BD 12 Heat Pump (Package [Ind) $29 00 RD 13 Heater (Unit. Radiant. etc.) $29.00 BD 14 Air Handler $29.00 BD 15 Duct Work only $59.00 RD 16 Evaporative Cooler $29.00 BD 17 Make- up Air System $59 00 BD 18 Moisture Fxhaust Duct (Clothes Dryer) $9.00 RD 19 Vent Fan (Single Duct) $9.00 BD 20 Vent System $29 00 BD 21 Exhaust Hood and Duct (Residential) $29.00 BD 22 Exhaust Hood - Type I (Commercial Grease Hood) $59.00 BD 23 Exhaust Hood Type II (Commercial Steam Hood) $59 00 BD 24 Non Residential Incinerator $59.00 RD 25 Refrigerator Condenser Remote $59 00 BD 26 Walk in Box / Refrigerator Coil $59.00 BD 27 BD 28 BD 29 BD30 BD 31 RD 32 BD 33 BD 34 BD 35 BD 36 BD 37 RD38 ELECTRICAL PERMIT EELS Stand Alone Electrical Plan Check (subject to hourly rate) New Multi Family Single Phase Service (per 100 amps) Three Phase Service (per 100 amps) All Other Types of Construction 15 or 20 amp • First 10 circuits (each) 15 or 20 amp - next 90 circuits (each) 15 or 20 amp • over 100 circuits (each) 25 to 40 amp circuits (each) 50 to 175 amp circuits (each) 200 amp and larger circuits (each) I emporary Service (each) Temporary Pole (each) Pre- Inspection (per hour) Generator Installation (per kW) PLUMBING PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Plumbing Plan Check (subject to hourly rate) S39 00 $59.00 $19.00 $9.00 $5.00 $29.00 $39 00 $49.00 $29.00 529.00 $118 00 529.00 BD 39 Fixtures (each) $9.00 BU 40 Gas System (First Outlet) $19.00 BD 41 Gas Outlets (Each Additional) $9.00 BD 42 Building Sewer $29.00 BD 43 Grease Trap $29.00 BD 44 Backflow Preventer More than 5 $19.00 BD 45 Backflow Preventer • each additional $4 00 BD 46 Hoof Drain - Rainwater System $59.00 BD 47 Water Heater (First I seater) $29 00 BD 48 Water Ileater (Each Additional Heater) $19.00 BD 49 Water Pipe Repair/ Replacement $19.00 BD 50 Drain- Vent Repair / Alterations $19.00 8D 51 Drinking Fountain $29.00 BD 52 Solar Water System Fixtures (solar panels, tanks, water treat $59.00 BD 53 Graywater Systems (per hour) $1 18.00 BD 54 Medical Gas System (Fact) OuHet) $9.00 1S Building Misc I ee Number Fee Name Fec BD 55 Abandoned Building Inspection Fee $1 /8 00 RD 56 Activity Permits 13D 57 Spccal Use Permit $350.00 BD 58 Temporary Use Permit, Type A $23/ 00 BD 59 1 emporary Use Permit, I ype L3 $1 10.00 Antenna— Telecom Facility BD 60 Equipment Container $653 00 BD 61 Cellular/ Mobile Phone, free standing $475.00 BD 62 Cellular/ Mobile Phone, co- location $415.00 RD 63 Appeal of Abatement Notice $475.00 BD 64 Awning/ Canopy (supported by building) $296.00 BD 65 Balcony Addition $475.00 BD 66 Building Moving Application Fee $831.00 BD 67 Carport $415 00 RD 68 Change of Occupancy $623.00 BD 69 Close Existing Openings $23/.00 BD /0 Compliance Inspections/ Reinspections $237.00 BD / 1 Condo Conversion $475.00 BD 72 Covered Porch $593.00 BD 73 Deck (wood) $534.00 RD /4 Demolition— Residential Partial Demo (flat fee) $100.00 BD 75 Demolition Residential $178.00 BD 76 Demolition— MultiFainily/ Commercial $296.00 BD 77 Document Research Fee $59.00 RD /8 Door—• New $475.00 BD 79 Drywall $1 18 00 Fence or Freestanding Wall (non- masonry) BD 80 >6 feet in height $267.00 BD 81 Fach additional 100 If $29 00 1 ence or Freestanding Wall (masonry) 13D 82 >6 feet in height $356 00 BD 83 rach additional 100 If $59 00 I fireplace BD 84 Masonry $26/ 00 BD 85 Pre- Fabricated/ Metal $207.00 BD 86 Flag pole (over 30 feet in height) $296 00 Garage (Residential) BD 87 Attached $415.00 BD 88 Detached $415.00 BD 89 Greenhouse (non • commercial) $415 00 Housing Inspection fees BD 90 1 3 Units $118.00 BD 91 4 10 Units $148 00 RD 92 11- 15 Units $207.00 13D 93 each add/ 115 Units $89.00 BD 94 Insulation $296 00 RD 95 Lighting pole $296.00 BD 96 each addi pole $59.00 BD 97 Mobile Horne $534 00 t3D 98 Mobile Home. double wide $593 00 / BD 99 BD 100 BD 101 BD 102 BD 103 BD 104 BD 105 BD 106 BD 107 Partition Commercial. Interior (up to 30 I. f.) Additional partition Partition Hcsidential, Interior (up to 30 I. 1.) Additional partition Patio Cover Wood frame Wood frame (with Calcs) Metal frame Photovoltaic System Pile Foundation BD 108 Cast in Place Concrete (first 10 piles) BD 109 Additional Piles (increments of 10) BD 110 Driven (steel, pre- stressed concrete) BD 111 Additional Piles (increments of 10) BD 112 Pre• Plan Check Appointments (first hour) BD 113 Pre- Plan Check Appt (each addl 1/ 2 hour) Remodel Residential BD 114 500 sf Single Story BD 115 Additional Remodel Re roof RD 116 Tile/ Shake - first 500 st BD 1 t 7 Each additional 100 sf RD 118 Comp/ Metal - first 500 sf (3D 119 Each additional 100 st BD 120 Roof Structure Replacement L3L) 121 Zach addht onal 100 st BD 122 Residential Re Plumb (Flat Rate) BD 123 Residential Re Wire (Flat Rate) !loom Addition— First Story BD 124 Up to 500 sf BD 125 Fach addition per 100sq ft BD 126 Up to 500 sf (w/ Calcs) BD 127 Each addition per 100sq ft Room Addition— Multi- story BD 128 Up to 500 sf BD 129 Each addition per 100sq ft BD 130 Up to 500 sf (with Catcs) RD 131 Fach addition per 100sq ft BD 132 Sauna steam RD 133 Siding BD 134 Additional siding Signs BD 135 Pole Sign, non- electric BD 136 Pole Sign, Electric BD 137 Wall/ Awning Sign, Non- Electric BD 138 Wall. Flectric RD 139 Skylight 13D 140 Spa or Hot Tub (Pre- fabricated) BD 141 Stairs First Flight RD 142 Fach additional flight $168.00 $9 00 $168.00 $9.00 $4 75 00 $475.00 $593.00 $475 00 $415.00 $4 /5.00 $178.00 $534.00 $23 /.00 $1 18.00 $59 00 $593.00 $29 00 $415 00 $9.00 $415.00 $9 00 $534.00 $48.00 $207.00 $207.00 $71200 $28.00 $890 00 $38.00 $950.00 $28 00 $1,12800 $38.00 $20/ 00 $ f 78.00 $1900 $296 00 $326.00 $207.00 $296.00 $20/.00 $178 00 $178.00 $29 00 20 BD 143 Storage Hacks RD 144 over 8' high (up 10 100 If) BD 145 each additional 100 If BD 146 Stucco Applications BD 14 / Additional Stucco Application Swimming PooV Spa BD 148 Gunite Master Plan Coord Prod. Unit BD 149 Each Additional 100 s 1. BD 150 Commercial Gunite pool (up to 800 st) 13D 151 Commercial Each Add'I 100 s f Window or Sliding Glass Door BD 152 New Window (non structural) BD 153 New window (structural) BD 154 each additional non- structural window BD 155 each additional structural window BD 156 BD 15/ BD 158 BD 159 OTHER MISCELLANEOUS FEES: Standard 1 Iourly 'late Research (per 1 / 2 hour) Supplemental Plan Check Fee Supplemental Inspection Fee BD 160 Emergency (Non. Scheduled) Call- Out Fee t BD 161 Atter Hours (Scheduled) Call- Out Fee BD 162 Each additional hour 13D 163 'PRA / Copies Subiect to Gity Copy Fee $268 00 $29.00 $23 /.00 $29.00 $475.00 $39.00 $564.00 $39.00 $168.00 $255 00 $27.00 $27.00 $11800 $59.00 $118 00 $11800 $4/500 $237 00 $1 18.00 (see Clerk's schedule) City of National City, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 15. 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 23 /ffEM TITLE / REPORT: Submission of 1-iscal Year 2007-2008 Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (Mile of Cars) Annual Budget, List of Hoard of Directors, 2007 and 2008 Profit and Loss Statements, and the 2007 Independent Auditor's Report. PREPARED BY Patricia Beard (ext. 4255) Redevelopment Manager DEPARTMENT Redevelopment Division Strategic Action Plan 4d EXPLANATIONS Since the formation ()Idle Mile of Cars Association, the Association has been required to submit their annual budget and a list of their Board Officers on an annual basis. The budget and list of Board of Officers for 2007-2(108 are herein included as Attachments 1 and 2 of this report. Support for local business associations coincides with City Strategic Plan Objective 4d, which calls for supporting Community Benelit Districts. The attached financial documents report landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Mile of Cars' financial activities covering fiscal year 2007 and year to date fiscal year 2008 herein included as Attachments 3 and 4. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Accept and tile report. rATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 1. Estimated 2008 Costs 4. 2008 Financial Statement 2. 2008 Board of Directors 3. 2007 Financial Statement A-200 (9/80) Attachment 1 PART II Cost Estimate for FY 2008 - 2009 The estimated total costs for maintenance of the impro\cment' are those as hereinafter set forth helou . For details regardimw the estimated cost of annual maintenance refer to the attached F.xhihit Median Frontage Improvements Improvements Cost of Annual Maintenance S7I.216.67 S57.083 33 Incidentals: A. Administration 300.00 300.00 B. Adhenising 200.00 200.00 C. Legal Fees 100.00 1(X).00 D. Engineering 700.(X) 500.00 Total Incidentals 1.300.()0 1.100.00 Total Estimated Annual Cost 72.516.67 58.183.33 Surplus or Deficit 00.00 _ 00.00 NET ANNUAL ASSESSMENT S72.516.67 S58.183.33 EXHIBIT -B" ESTBIATLL) COST OF ANN(Al. \1AL\TENANCE FY 2008 2009 Median Frontage Improvements Improvements I Ltx%n planting care 0.00 S :I.933.33 '. Median planting care S 15.966.61 0.00 3. Palm tree maintenance S 5.700.00 S 5.700.00 1. Water usage S 18.(XX).00 S 18.000.00 5. Refurbishment of graphics panels S 12.000.00 0.00 6. General maintenance of electrical system S 6.500.00 0.00 7. Electrical usage S 9.000 00 0.00 8. Refurbishment of decorative crosswalks S 1.800.00 S I .'_(X).(X) 8. Miscellaneous S 250.00 S 250.00 TOTAL: $69.216.0 $57.083.33 ATTACHMENT 2 2008 Board of Directors LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 — MILE OF CARS 1. Bill Cumming (Ron Baker Chevrolet) - President 2. Tim Howell (Mossy Nissan) - VP 3. Gregg Vaughn (Ilarrison Buick) - Treasurer 4. Perry Falk (Perry Ford) - Director 5. John Ball (Ball Auto Group) - Director G. Tony Mc Cune (Mc Cune Chrysler) - Director 7. Jim Fornaca (Frank Toyota) - Director 8. Lane Pearson (SD Dodge) - Director 9. Jim Redogna (Saturn of NC) - Director 10. Rudy Frm (South Bay VW.) - Director ATTACHMENT 3 Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Financial Statements December 31, 2007 Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Table of Contents Page Accountant's compilation report 1 Financial statements Balance sheet Statement of income and retained earnings 2 3 Howard Silberman, An Accountancy Corporation www hy,,;,r rr,n 6060 S,nnu lit," I. ;iurtr, l;;U - ;an Dlerlo. CA '171>4 • Tel 858 268 3330 • Fax 81,8•266.3355 Accountant's Compilation Report Mile of Cars Association National City. California I have compiled the accompanying balance sheet of Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (a segment of Mlle of Cars Association) (a corporation) as of December 31, 2007. and the related statement of income and retained earnings for the year then ended. in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial statements information that is the representation of management I have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them Management has elected to omit substantially all of the disclosures and the statement of cash flows required by generally accepted accounting principles If the omitted disclosures and the statement of cash flows were included in the financial statements, they might influence the user's conclusions about the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows Accordingly, these financial statements are not intended for those who are not informed about such matters. I am not independent with respect to Mile of Cars Association. San Diego, California January 14, 2008 1 Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Balance Sheet December 31, 2007 ASSETS Current assets Cash $ 27 894 27,894 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities Accounts payable $ 186 Stockholders' equity 27 708 $_ 27 894 See accountant's compilation report. - 2 - Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Statement of Income and Retained Earnings For the Year Ended December 31, 2007 Revenue Assessments $ 127.114 Interest income 808 1 27, 922 Expenses Professional fees 1.278 Bank charges 216 Repairs and maintenance 71.065 Utilities 44.916 Net income Retained earnings - beginning of year Retained earnings - end of year See accountants compilation report. 117,475 10,447 17.261 $ _ 27 708 -3- Attachment 4 Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Financial Statements May 31, 2008 Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Table of Contents Page Accountant's compilation report 1 Financial statements Balance sheet Statement of operations and retained earnings 2 3 Howard Silberman, An A, countan. y Cos pot ,.iwn www hcnoc.com 6OL0 ;nnto Ho, il. Sunn130 • Son Dirgto. CA. y 21'2'1 lut: Rr.R 7f:R 3330 • fHtB5t1-Y1iU-J.Pob Accountant's Compilation Report Mile of Cars Association National City, California I have compiled the accompanying balance sheet of Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (a segment of Mile of Cars Association) (a corporation) as of May 31, 2008, and the related statement of operations and retained earnings for the five months then ended, in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants A compilation is limited to presenting in the form of financial statements information that is the representation of management I have not audited or reviewed the accompanying financial statements and. accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them. Management has elected to omit substantially all of the disclosures and the statement of cash flows required by generally accepted accounting principles. If the omitted disclosures and the statement of cash flows were included in the financial statements, they might influence the user's conclusions about the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Accordingly, these financial statements are not intended for those who are not informed about such matters. I am not independent with respect to Mile of Cars Association. San Diego. California June 12.2008 ck„.„. -1- Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Balance Sheet May 31, 2008 ASSETS Current assets Cash $ 45,814 Current liabilities Accounts payable Stockholders' equity LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY See accountant's compilation report $ 45.814 $ 1,915 43,899 $ 45,814 -2- Mile of Cars Association Maintenance Account (A Segment of Mile of Cars Association) (A Corporation) Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings For the Five Months Ended May 31, 2008 Revenue Assessments $ 61,031 Interest income 324 61.355 Expenses Professional fees 1,703 Bank charges 90 Office expense 100 Repairs and maintenance 28.080 Utilities 15,191 Net income Retained earnings - beginning of period Retained earnings - end of period See accountant's compilation report 45,164 16,191 27,708 $ 43.899 -3- City of National City, California CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 15 7008 AGENDA ITEM NO 24 (ITEM TITLE REPORT: Submission of Fiscal Year 2007-2008 Downtown National City Property Business Improvement District (Morgan Square Community. Benefit District) Annual Budget, List of Board of Directors. 2007 and 2008 Profit and Loss Statements. and the 2007 Independent Auditor's Report. PREPARED BY Patricia Beard (ext. 4255) Redevelopment Manager DEPARTMENT Redevelopment Division Strategic Action Plan 4d EXPLANATIONS Since the formation of the National City Property Business Improvement District in liscal year 2004- 2005. the District is required to submit their annual budget and a list of their Board of Directors on a yearly basis. On January 24, 2007, The California Attorney General. pursuant to Corporation Code section 5813.5. approved a Certificate of Amendment of Articles of Incorporation of Morgan Square District, voted on and approved by the Board of Directors. to change the status of the corporation from a nonprofit public benefit corporation to that of California Mutual Benefit Corporation. The name of the corporation is Morgan Square Inc. Pursuant to this new designation, Morgan Square Inc. developed and approved the Bylaws of Morgan Square Inc. wherein under Article 10, Section 1., the Board approved the fiscal year of the Corporation to begin January i and end on Decemher 31 of each year. The attached financial documents report Morgan Square's financial activities covering the above mentioned time period for fiscal year 2007 and year to date fiscal year 2008. Environmental Review N/A Financial Statement N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Accept and tile report. 1 ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. I. Annual Budget 4. 2008 Profit and Loss statement with backup I. 2. Board of I)ircctors 5. 2007 Independent Auditor's Report 3. 2007 Profit and Loss Statement with backup A-200 (9/80) ATTACHMENT 1 M G R GA N Sou .4 R F_ THE HCAHT OF SOUTH BAY DISTRICT GOVERNANCE AND THE MORGAN SQUARE DISTRICT MANAGEMENT: Morgan Square, Inc., a non-profit management corporation composed of property and business owners in the downtown district of National City. President: Patti Finnegan - Niederfrank's Ice Cream Vice President: Nilesh Patel - Howard Johnson's - NC Executive Secretary: Ditas Yamane - The Phone Shop Treasurer Melyn Acasio — National City Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors: Jim Beauchamp - Parkside Towers Emesto Guzman — Plaza Management Sharon Meints - Appliance Parts Center Marcia Nordstrom - Trophy Lounge Restaurant Mike Sunshine - General Bead Company Juan Jose Torres - Bay Theatres Benefit Zones: 1 he Morgan Square District Benefit Zones are created based upon the frequency and type of special benefit services that might be desired The core area is National City Boulevard and 81' Street and may. need special benefit services, have large special events and be the focus of many promotional activities. Benefit Zone lone 1 (core area) lone 7 (peripheral area) Boundaries National City Boulevard from 7n° to 1/^ Street 8"' Street from the Interstate 5 freeway bridge to A Avenue All other streets in the district not included in Benefit Zone 1 Consistent with state law, any property assessment district must confer a special benefit to real property owners paying into the assessment district. At times, specific parcels will derive greater benefit, due to their proximity to a "core" area. These core and peripheral parcels, will from time to time, be designated through "benefit zones." The Morgan Square District has two benefit zones, each receiving varying degrees of special benefits funded from the assessment district. Downtown National City Property Improvement District ti35 n Avenue National City. CA 91050 Tel r51nt 477.9130.7 omvil monia71st1uate6-Ao. rn•t ATTACHMENT 2 III. MORGANS0UARE_ BAY THE ri 7_A77 OF SOUTH Morgan Square District - the heart of Southbay ! The future of Southbay! Board of Directors Name Business Name Telephone Email Address Term Patti Finnegan - President Niederfranks Ice Cream (619) 477-0828 n/ederfranks ao/.com 2009 Nilesh Patel - Vice President Howard Johnson Hotel 619-368-3061 npatel yno;osd.cor. 2009 Ditas Yamane - Executive Secretary The Phone Shop (619) 474-3500 ditasyamane@ccx net 2009 Melyn Acasio - Treasurer NC Chamber of Commerce (619) 407-4217 macasio@Oanksanmego.com 2009 Jim Beauchamp Park Village Towers (619) 477-7700 )Imncnp;_iattg,oba).net 2009 Ernesto Guzman Plaza Management (619) 952-1700 emestoguzman_98@notmail.com 2009 Sharon Meints Appliance Parts Center (619) 921-8738 sharon@appl,ancepariscenter.com 2009 Marcia Nordstrom Trophy Lounge Restaurant (858) 945-6272 pbnords,'^aol.com 2009 Mike Sunshine General Bead Company (619) 336.0100 : genbeadPsbcglobal.net 2009 Bay Theatres (619) 482-4924 : Cell. (619) 227-1209 ! 2C09 Juan Jose Torres ATTACHMENT 3 Mnry,an Square, Inc. Statement of Financial Position December 3I, 2007 (With Comparative Totals for 2006) Assets 2007 2006 Current Assets Cash in Checking S 124,396 S 95,894 Certificates of Deposit 50,767 102,764 Total Assets Liabilities and Net Assets 175,163 S 198,658 Current Liabilities Accrued Erpenscs S 7,470 S 8,100 'total Liabilities 7,470 8,100 if Net Assets - Unrestricted S 167,693 S 190,558 Total Liabilities and Net Assets S 175,163 S 198,658 The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Financial Statements ATTACHMENT 4 Morgan Square District FINANCIAL POSITION May 30, 2008 Ralance UBOC General Fund as of 05-01 08 $19,407.49 $31,951.35 Deposits: 05/27 (from USAFCU Savings) 525, 000.00 05/30 - CL)C $6. 951.35 $51,358.84 Total Balance (160C General Fund $26, 7t1t, 00 Less: Total Disbursements - 05/1-30/08 5226 - Urban Corps - San Diego March 08 $10, 833.00 5230 - Urban Corps - San Diego - April 08 $10, 833.00 5231 - Richard becker Sculpture $5, 000. 00 Bank Service fees $40.00 Total Balance Cash in Rank: General Fund 524,652.84 OISA ICU Business Savings k 0464. $80,590.37 FFCU Balance CD Account 2320: $104, 05 7.93 USA Federal CU Balance CD Account 04! 1: $44,375.19 USA Federal CI) Balance co Account 0493: S7,287.99 Total Cash -in -Bank $260,964.32 Morgan Squat District ROD Meeting 6/10/2008 /Sonnenberg) at Company C1PA. ,wm• Varmint mem} Attachment 5 Sonnenberg & Company, t..:rt s A Professional Corporation 5190 Governor Drive, Suite 201. San Diego, California 92122 Phone (868) 457-5252 • (800) 464-411OA • Fax: (858) 457-2211 • (800) 303-4FAX /Sonnenberg\ & Company 35 TZARS al muerte', Leonard C. Sonnenberg, CPA MORGAN SQUARE, INC. Audited Financial Statements December 31, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Palle Independent Auditor's Report 1 Statement of Financial Position 2 Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets 3 Statement of Cash Flows 4 Notes to the Financial Statements 5-7 Member: The Arnencan Institute of Certified Public Accountants and California Society of Certified Public Accountants teonnenbergN & Company CPA ..,,n..TAW. s•wan taco., Sonnenberg & Company, CPAs A Professional Corporation 5190 Governor Drive, Suite 201, San Diego, California 92122 Phone: (858) 457-5252 • (800) 464-4110A • Fa= (858) 457-2211 • (800) 303-4FAX lSonnenberl & Company 35 IMAMSU rIucncs Lco,u,rd C. Sonnenberg. CPA INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT Morgan Square, Inc. Members of the Board of Directors: We have audited the accompanying statement of financial position of Morgan Square, Inc. (a nonprofit organization) as of December 31, 2007, and the related statements of activities, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of Morgan Square, Inc.'s Board of Directors. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The prior year summarized comparative information has been derived from the Organization's December 31, 2006 financial statements and, in our report dated July 16, 2007, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements arc tree of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to in the first paragraph present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Morgan Square, Inc. as of December 31, 2007, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of Arnerica. February 29, 2008 onnenberg & Comp CPAs 1 Member: The American institute of Certified Public Accountants and California Society of Certified Public Accountants Morgan Square, Inc. Statement of Financial Position December 31, 2007 (With Comparative Totals for 2006) Assets 2007 2006 Current Assets Cash in Checking $ 124,396 S 95,894 Certificates of Deposit 50,767 102,764 Total Assets $ 175,163 S 198,658 Liabilities and Net Assets Current Liabilities Accrued Expenses S 7,470 S 8,100 Total Liabilities 7,470 8,100 II Nct Assets - Unrestricted $ 167,693 S 190,558 Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 175,163 S 198,658 The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part oldie Financial Statements Morgan Square, Inc. Statement of Activities For the year ended December 31, 2007 (With Comparative Totals for 2006) 2007 2006 Revenue Property Tax Assessment S 224,379 $ 231,371 Interest Income 527 2.764 Other Income 4,784 Total Revenue 229,690 234,135 Expenses Insurance - General Liability 500 500 Insurance - F.rn rs & Omissions 1,800 Tax & Licenses 2,528 139 Advertising 2,972 662 Membership Fees 1,500 100 Bank Charges 100 150 Miscellaneous 222 Donations 3.200 Administrative 23,400 21,600 Maintenance Services 12,471 108,000 Signs 7,408 23,519 Legal & Accounting 2,700 8,172 Branding Consultant 45,783 Artist 10,000 - Professional Services 143,193 - Total Expenses 252,555 168,064 lncreaseJ(Decrease) in Net Assets (22,865) 66,071 Net Assets, beginning of the year 190,558 124,487 Net Assets, end of year $ 167,693 S 190,558 The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Financial Statements 3 Morgan Square, Inc. Statement of Cash Flows For the year ended December 31, 2007 (With Comparative Totals for 2006) 2007 2000 Cash Flows from Operating Activities Increase/(Decrease) in Net Assets S (22,865) $ 66.071 Adjustments to Reconcile Increase in Net Assets to Net Cash Provided / (Used) by Operating Activities Decrease in Accounts Payable (630) 1,800 Net Cash Provided / (Used) by Operating Activities (23,495) 67,871 Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents (23,495) 67,871 Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 198,658 130,787 Cash and Cash Equivalents at Ending of Year S 175,163 S 198,658 The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of the Financial Statements 4 Morgan Square, Inc. Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2007 Note 1: Organization and Nature of Activities Morgan Square, Inc. (the District, also known as "Morgan Square District" or "National City Downtown Property Business Improvement District") was incorporated on December 13, 2004 as a non-profit public -benefit corporation. Thc District operates under an agreement with the Community Development Commission of the City of National City, CA. The District includes 153 parcels representing 96 property owners. Operations began, essentially, in May 2005 with the initial receipt of assessment revenue (See Note 4). The primary objectives and purposes of this corporation arc to bring about the revitalization of the District and its surrounds in the City of National City and to bring about the increased economic well being of residents, employees, and businesses within the District and its surrounds. In addition, the District strives to promote business improvement and economic development within the District through activities which contribute to the neighborhood and well-being of the Morgan Square Community. Morgan Square, inc. is led by a group of significant, small and long-time business and property owners, who pay special ,ss ssment in the District. The thirteen Members of the Board of the Directors composed of four (4) officers and nine (9) board of directors are all business -owners and property owners within the district. Note 2: Income Tax Status Thc District is exempt from federal and state income taxes under Section 501(c)(6) of the internal Revenue Code and section 23701 (e) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes is included in the accompanying financial statements. Note 3: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Method ufAccouuting The financial statements of the District have been prepared on the accrual basis of accounting and accordingly reflect all significant receivables, payables, and other liabilities. l mancial Statement of Presentation The District accounts for contributions in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 116, Accounting for Contributions Received and Contributions Made. Accordingly, any contributions received would be recorded as unrestricted, temporarily restricted, and permanently resttictcd support, depending on the existence and/or nature of any donor restrictions. When a restriction expires, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets. 5 Morgan Square, Inc. Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2007 Note 3: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (coned) The financial statements are presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 117, Financial Statements of Not -for -Profit Organizations, which requires the District to report information regarding its financial position and activities according to three classes of net assets: unrestricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets, and permanently restricted net assets. As of December 31, 2007, there were no restricted assets. Cash and cash equivalents For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the District considers all highly liquid investments available for current use with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Revenue Recognition The primary source of District revenue is from the Maintenance Assessments collected by the County of San Diego. The County estimates the Assessment charges annually based on the secured properties on record as of October of each year. The County remits the collected assessments monthly in accordance with Tax Revenue Accountability Reports. Revenue is recognized by the District in the month received. Concentration of Credit Risk The District maintained its cash in bank deposit accounts. The District has not experienced any losses in such accounts. The District believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash equivalents. Estimate The preparation of financial statements on ibe accrual basis of accounting requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates. Note 4: Assessment Income The District's income is derived from property tax assessed on properties within the District. The assessment year is July 1 through June 30 of each year. The original budgeted assessment for 2006/07 was $214,000. The actual assessment charges for tax years 05/06 and 06/07 were $211,039 and $278,832 respectively. Assessments received through December 31, 2007 were $224,379. 6 Morgan Square, Inc. Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2007 Note 5. Commitments: The District has contracted with Urban Corps of San Diego County, a nonprofit organization, to provide maintenance services within the District. The services include street sweeping, litter abatement, graffiti removal, chemical removal, recyclables, power wash, weed abatement, tree trimming, and related services. The contract is for $10,833 per month during 2007. The District has contracted with their Board Secretary, Ditas Yamane, for basic administration management of the District at the rate of $1,800 per month for 2007. Note 6. Comparative Financial Information The financial statement includes comparative summary information from the prior fiscal year. Such information should be read in conjunction with the organization's financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, from which the summarized information was derived. 7 rSonnenber? & Company CPA Sonnenberg & Company, CPAs A Professional Corporation 5190 Governor Drive, Suite 201, San Diego, California 92122 Phone: (8G8) 457-6252 • (800) 464-4HOA • Ftaz: (858) 457-2211 • (800) 303-4FAX r/ Sonnenberg & Company 35 Yuri ILL} FINANCIAL ADVISORY LETTER February 29, 2008 Board of Directors c/o Ditas Yamane Morgan Square, Inc. 1808 E. 16' Street National City, CA 91950 Leonard C. Sonnenberg. CPA We have presented your audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 in a format recommended by the AICPA Audit and AccountinC Guide for Not -For -Profit Organizations. This letter does not affect our report dated July 28, 2007 on the financial statements. In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements, we considered the Organization's internal control to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on internal control. However, during our audit we became aware of several matters that are opportunities for strengthening internal controls and operating efficiency. We have prepared the accompanying recommendations for your consideration in a separate attachment. • The Specific Recommendations that accompany this letter detail specific areas we noted during our audit that would improve controls, efficiency, accuracy, safeguarding assets, and/or management information for your Organization. • The Standard Recommendations that accompany this letter summarize our suggestions and regulations that apply to most non-profit organizations. We wish to thank Ditas Yamane for the cooperation she provided to us. We have been pleased to be retained as your auditing firm. Member: The American lusutule of Certified Public Accountants and Cnnfot nia Society of Certified Public Accountants Morgan Square District - Management Advisory Letter STANDARD RECOMMENDATIONS Audit and/or Finance Committee: The Board of Directors should consider appointing an Audit Committee in order to have direct, confidential communication with the independent auditor. The Audit Committee should have qualified persons with financial experience, and should not include the Executive Director, CFO, or other employees. A Finance Committee is recommended to consider financial oversight of operations, investment policies, major fund- raising. and Tong -range planning. The Finance Committee should have qualified persons with financial expertise, and should not have a majority of staff members. Conflict of interest Policy: The Board of Directors is required by California Corporation Code 7233 to disclose any conflicts of interest. We recomniend that the Organization adopt a formal conflict of interest policy aimed at preventing or resolving issues related to potential or actual conflict of interest issues. In addition, the Board and management should be educated about ethics, disclosure, and independence in order to prevent related party transactions, self -dealing, private inurement, and similar issues. If they exist, these transactions must be disclosed to the auditor and, if significant, in the audit report. Such transactions are often scrutinized by the iRS and Attorney General and may be disallowed if the amounts and the business purpose arc not clearly identifiable. Fraud: In 2002, AiCPA issued SAS 99, Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statenuent Audit, requiring auditors to increase their procedures to detect fraud and to discuss the possibility for fraud with the client during the audit. The Organization Board of Directors, management, and employees are encouraged to contact the auditor if they feel fraud exists or could potentially exist. However, an audit is still not guaranteed to detect fraud, even if it exists. Management and the Board of Directors are responsible to design internal controls that protect against fraud. In -kind Donations: Many nonprofit organizations receive significant amounts of donated materials, property, and services. Often, these donations have a financial value that can be recorded in the financial statements if accurate records are provided to the auditor: • Donated Materials: Description, date received, estimated fair market value • Donated Property: Description, date received, estimated fair market value • Donated Services: Description, number of hours, estimated hourly rate, program benefited Insurance: Insurance coverage should be reviewed annually to ensure adequate coverage types and amounts, including General Liability, Professional Liability, Property. Directors & Officers, Volunteers, Special Events, etc. Directors and Officers coverage would protect the Organization and individual board members and officers from personal liability for lawsuits against the Organization. All other insurance coverage should be reviewed annually to ensure adequate coverage. The additional cost of insurance may be negligible when compared to the liability exposure. investment Policy: The Board should consider adopting a formal investment policy aimed at guiding management in issues related to investment risk, authorization, limits, and related issues. Morgan Square District - Management Advisory Letter Minutes: Board of Directors meetings should be held regularly and proper minutes should be kept of all meetings. These minutes should indicate that the Board documents significant financial information, such as: approval of the budget, financial statements, replacement fund transactions, write-offs of uncollectible receivables, capital expenditures, contract approvals. related party transactions, insurance settlements, and litigation matters. Tax Returns - Increased Scrutiny: Non-profit organizations must file annual exempt organization tax returns to report on financial activities as well as changes within the organization, fundraising, lobbying, compensation, etc. In 2004, the IRS and California Attorney General announced plans to hire additional auditors to audit more exempt organization returns. California's new Nonprofit Integrity Act will focus on governance, i.e. adequate oversight by the Board. In particular, the two agencies are focusing on: • IRS: political activities, tax shelters, excessive compensation packages, donated property transactions (vehicles, land, buildings). • California Attorney General: Executive compensation, public disclosure of audits, commercial fundraising, audit committees, raffles. Further, public access to nonprofit returns via GuideStar means that anyone can look at your 990 at any time. Professional, complete, and accurate tax preparation is vital to your organization's image. Tax Returns - Client Preparation: Even with tax preparation by your auditor, the nonprofit must provide certain information that cannot be obtained from basic financial records. Nonprofits should be prepared to provide this critical information at tax time: • List of Board Members: name, title, hours worked, compensation, expense account • List of Contributors that gave over $5,000: Name, address, amount. This information is NOT public information and is blocked out on GuideStar. • Operating Questions: The 990 and Form RRFI contain a long list of questions regarding operations, disclosures, in -kind donations, relationships with other nonprofits, related parties, fraud, political activity City of National City, California COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .EETING DATE5 July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 25 ITEM TITLE City Council's Designation of League ofC'alifornia Cities Voting Delegate and Alternate PREPARED BY EXPLANATION Leslie 1)eesc Asst. City Manager 336-42 (1 DEPARTMENT City Nlanagcr Me League's 2008 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 24-27 in Long Beach. An important part of the annual conference is the Annual Business Meeting scheduled for September 27. 2008. At this meeting. the League membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish I.caguc policy. The Mayor has suggested that the Mayor be designated as the Voting Delegate and the Vice Mayor being the Alternate. City Council action reflecting this designation is requested. Environmental Review ✓ NIA Financial Statement N/A Account No. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Request Council designate the Mayor as the Voting Delegate and the Vice Mayor as the Alternate for the League's annual business meeting on September 27, 2008. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N;A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No. I. League correspondence dated June 13, 2008. L A-200 (9/80) 1-100 K SIRLLI SACRA?II NI u. CA `liftll PH.1916) 61,8.8200 vx. 0)16) 65H-8240 AG U 4 2008 01 CAI I'ORNIA CITIES WW'L'.CACI IIL, VRG Please review this memo carefully. New procedures were adopted in 2006 regarding designation of voting delegates and alternates and voting at the Annual Conference. June 13, 2008 TO: Mayors, City Managers and City Clerks RE: DESIGNATION OF VOTING DELEGATES AND ALTERNATES League of California Cities Annual Conference — September 24-27, Long Beach • The League's 2008 Annual Conference is scheduled for September 24-27 in Long Beach. An important part ofthc Annual Conference is the Annual Business Meeting, scheduled for 8:30 a.m., September 27, at the Long Beach Convention Center. At this meeting, the I.eague membership considers and takes action on resolutions that establish League policy. In order to vote at the Annual Business Meeting, your city council must designate a voting delegate. In the event that the designated voting delegate is unable to serve in that capacity, your city may appoint up to two alternate voting delegates. In 2006, the ability to appoint up to two alternates was the result of approval of a League bylaws amendment that increased the number of voting delegate altcmates from one to two. Please complete the attached Voting Delegate form and return it to the I.eague's office no later than September 5, so that voting delegate/alternates records may be established prior to the conference. At the conference, voting delegate forms may he returned to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the conference registration area. Please note the following procedures that are intended to ensure the integrity of the voting process at the Annual Business Meeting. • Action by Council Required. Consistent with League bylaws, a city's voting delegate and up to two alternates must be designated by the city council. When completing the attached Voting Delegate form, please attach either a copy of the council resolution that reflects the council action taken, or have your city clerk or mayor sign the form affirming that the names provided are those selected by the city council. Please note that designating the voting delegate and alternates must be done by city council action and cannot he accomplished by individual action of the mayor or city manager alone. • Conference Registration Required. The voting delegate and alternates must be registered to attend the conference. At least one must he present at the Business Meeting and in possession of voting card in order to cast a vote. Voting delegates and alternates -more- are requested to pick up their conference badges before signing in and picking up the voting dcicgatc card at the Voting Delegates Dcsk. This will enable them to receive the special stamps on their name badges that will admit them into the voting area during the Business Meeting. • Transferring Voting Card to Non -Designated Individuals Not Allowed. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but only between the voting delegate and alternates. If the voting delegate and alternates find themselves unable to attend the Business Meeting, they may not transfer the voting card 10 another city official. • New Seating Protocol during General Assembly. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission to this area will be limited to those individuals with a special stamp on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. If the voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, they should he sure to sign in at the Voting Delegate desk and obtain the special stamps on their badges. The Voting Delegate desk in the conference registration area will be open September 24, 25 and 26, and prior to the Business Meeting on September 27. The conference registration area will open at 12:00 p.m., on September 24, at the Long Beach Convention Center. The Voting Delegate desk will also he open at the Business Meeting, but not during a roll call vote, should one be undertaken. The voting procedures that will be used at the conference are attached to this memo. Please share it and this memo with your council and especially with the individuals your council designates as your city's voting delegate and alternates. Once again, thank you for completing the voting delegate and alternate form and returning it to the League office by September 5. If you have questions, please call Mary McCullough at (916) 658-8247. Attachments: • 2008 Annual Conference Voting Procedures • Voting Delegate/Alternate Form LEAGUE Of CALILORNIA __CITIES 1400 K Street, Suite 400 • Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: 916.658.8200 Fax: 916.658.8240 www.cacities.org Annual Conference Voting Procedures 2008 Annual Conference 1. One (:ity One Vote. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. Designating a City Voting Representative. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city council may designate a voting delegate and up to two alternates; these individuals are identified on the Voting Delegate Form provided to the League Credentials Committee. 3. Registering with the Credentials Committee. The voting delegate, or alternates, may pick up the city's voting card at the Voting Delegate Desk in the conference registration area. We encourage voting delegates and alternates to sign in at the Voting Delegate Desk so that they may receive a special stamp on their name badge and thus he admitted to the voting area at the Business Meeting. 4. Signing Initiated Resolution Petitions. Only those individuals who are voting delegates (or alternates) and who have picked up their city's voting card by providing a signature to the Credentials Committee at the Voting Delegate Desk may sigi petitions to initiate a resolution. 5. Voting. To cast the city's vote, a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. The voting card may be transferred freely between the voting delegate and alternates, but may not be transferred to another city official who is not either a voting delegate or alternate. 6. Voting Area at Business Meeting. At the Business Meeting, individuals with the voting card will sit in a separate area. Admission will be limited to those individuals with a special stamp on their name badge identifying them as a voting delegate or alternate. if the city's voting delegate and alternates wish to sit together, all should sign in at the Voting Delegate desk and obtain the special stamps on their badges. 7. Resolving Disputes. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the validity of signatures on petitioned resolutions and the right of a city official to vote at the Business Meeting. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA -.CITIES CITY: 2008 ANNUAL CONFERENCE VOTING DELEGATE/ALTERNATE FORM Please complete this form and return it to the League office by September 5, 2008. Forms not sent by this deadline may be submitted to the Voting Delegate Desk located in the Annual Conference Registration Area. Your city council may designate one voting delegate and up to two alternates. In order to vote at the Annual Business Mccting, voting delegates and altemates must be desigmatcd by your city council. Please attach the council resolution as proof of designation. As an alternative, the Mayor or City Clerk may sign this form, affirming that the designation reflects the action taken by the council. Please note: Voting delegates and alternates will be seated in a separate area at the Annual Business Meeting. Admission to this special area will be limited to individuals (voting delegates and alternates) who are identified with a special stamp on their conference badge. If your city's voting delegate and altemates wish to sit together at the Business Meeting, they are all encouraged to sign in at the Voting Desk in order to obtain the identifying stamp that will admit them to the special voting area. 1. VOTING DELEGATE Name: Title: 2. VOTING DELEGATE - ALTERNATE 3. VOTING DELEGATE F: - ALTERNATE Name: Name: Title: Title: PLEASE ATTACH COUNCII. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATES. ATTEST (I affirm that the information provided reflects action by the city council to designate the voting delegate and alternate.) Name: Phone: Title: Date: Please complete and return by September 5 to: League of California Cities ATTN: Mary McCullough 1400 K Street Sacramento, CA 95814 FAX: (916) 658-8240 Ar2001Wohnigl klcgarcLcncr.doc City of National City, California COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT JEETING DATE July 15, 2008 AGENDA ITEM NO. 26 ITEM TITLE Warrant Register for the period of 06/13/08 through 06/26/08 in the amount of $474,359.35 PREPARED BY Rizza Dela Cuadra DEPARTMENT Finance Accountant Jeanette Ladrido EXPLANATION (619) 336-4331 The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants above $50,000.00. Vendor MA Stevens Construction Portillo Concrete, Inc Project Design Consultants K.,..... See attached report. Check# Amount Explanation 18113 $170,096.73 Library Remodel 18115 $71,283.51 Professional Services —NC Blvd Street- scape/Fountain Plaza 18116 $67,781 25 Professional Services —NC Blvd Street- scape Environmental Review ✓ N/A Financial Statement Approved by: _ ano ?6_ .f ette Ladrido. Finance Director Account No. N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION Ratification of warrants in the amount of $474,359.35 BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below ) Resolution No. Ratification of Expenditures for the period 06/13/08 THROUGH 06/26/08 A-200 (9/80) Ya1 rr REDEVELOPMENT F'IINI) • I'l- I IY1.\\II ( IX HI( K LN(.L\I:L RING COMPANY S\L\RI & FINAL ST.\Tr COMPCNSA11ON INSI`R.ANCC PAT BEARD REST RFS I A. KK11 OFK BLUE \l0OS: AOVFK I PON(. (IIRISf -\SIN'(II\(hKI)I FI•GFR ( I I 1 (IF \.\ 11111AL CI I Y CI I Y OI S.\\ DIEGO GE ( AI'ITAI. GLOSY\TEC CO\SI I TA\TS KI.\SFR \14KSII)\ \\\(R LAIRS IN( KLCRSFF1 \IA \11 '.h\\1 01\II t.( ILots. I \ C el I \F 1 HOWLS POHTII LOCO!'CRFIE.INC PROIFCT DLSIGN CONSULTANTS SAN DIEGO GAS & FI F( I HI( ISIO\ EN 'ERNE I PR( VIIH H\ ALI Rr. DO 1 BARK:\ SL((•riuts is • HOL SING ASSISI ANCL PANMI N 1 S rr T1 CASH CLX 1'QL II AX (RCDI f l\HIR \1.\ 11( IN\VC ( ORPORATF F.S PRE\\ INC STALE( ()MN N\\IR)\I\SI R\`CL VI I \I- IOW PS \IO21G.\UF FOR \IFETLVG OF JI'LY 15.2008 \\ ARR\N IRFS:INT FK FOR PF:KII Ht. Hall; 26818 Description CAR No Amount I(L PLLNISII\ICV 1 01 PUTTY CASH FIND I%U99 1-911 PROI LSSIONAL SI.RVICFS HAl \I\ kIV.\ !WIVEIR100 33.U91 .'3 HEALTHY IIOMFS NI,PPI IFN IIHI i1374 FMPI OVI-I- s WORK FRS' COMP PREMI1\1 I%I07 L95651 F:INIH.LLL HOL'SF 18103 5.1 Rt PROFESSIO\AL SERVICI S • CYAC • I.1(:AI. SFK\I(-h I8I04 I.SMI G AI,\RKLIING IBIOi WR)IKI PROFESSIONAL SFRVICCS • PI'RPI F. (()\\ t%106 501K) RLIMDURSE\11.NT OF CI I•\PHa-+u0%nR.\u'fx)WN Ixlu, 14.34' F.;I.\TFRYRISI• /1(\F SOMINISIR.\IIVF EXPENSE'S 1%1U:5 SR.500UU Rh DI-V1.1 (WARN! COPIER 18109 11R SS PROI FSSIONAL SCR\ICCS PALM PLAL:\ P5110 %.1 9 +! PROFESSIONAL. SCR\ICLS PI.ANNI\(, In111 2.3(' 55 I. IRRARY RF\IODCL I <1 I2 6 3;l a5 I.IRRAR\' RE 1uDFI 1<113 I"0.096 '3 RFNTAI. ( HAIL.L\ IS113 1,566 (111 PkOFIS\IONALSI•RVICFS • \('R STRI I. TSC.SYF./01'\T: IN PI \/•\ ISMS )1 a1+I PROFfSSIO\AI SERVI(IS.NCH SIR-FTs( APh IS11h n']8125 LIILITICS-1415DAV[ 516h-17d16 111f' 4.53s3: IA LosiTF DLSIGN S\"( lal l' 11910 75 HOUSING CONSII TANI na.Hl 06+15 OS 15119 3.000UU SL'RIOTAL- REDF-\'LLOPNIENT $ 452.949.15 MANUAL PAYMEN rS 1 15 229 40 REPLENISII\ICNT 01 PUT TY ('A\H F1 NI) 1)1469 5'0 CRf DIT BACKGROII.D ('llh( K FOR ss U471 161 14 SR OFFICL SI'FPI IFS 1046R 10091, L1IPI.OYFF4 NORKFR'. COMP PRE\11F\I I0470 4+' 1u KLN I. \I l IL\KGES I04'3 I.\A. (R) \s 1 H HCF SPA('F RLNTAI 1L 1.1' OR 101:2 3.R)A 70 SI'BTO1 \1. 1F1.111h18 S 21.410.20 TOTAL OF ALL FL NOS: S 474359.35 City of National City, California COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT MEETING DATE July 15, 2008 27 AGENDA ITEM NO. ITEM TITLE A resolution approving an Amendment to the Rules Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Business Occupants in the National City Redevelopment Project. PREPARED BY ADEPARTMENT Patricia Beard (ext 4255) y''" Redevelopment Division Redevelopment Manager EXPLANATION On May 16, 1995, the CDC Board adopted Rules Governing Participation in redevelopment projects in the National City Redevelopment Project area. While these rules identify a time frame during which property owners must submit a Statement of Interest about participating in a specific redevelopment project, they do not define a time frame or deadline by which an actual participation or development proposal must be received. This resolution, if adopted, would clarify the rules by providing that detailed Participation Proposals fulfilling the CDC's Submittal Requirements must be submitted to the CDC within 45 days following the Statement of Interest submittal. An Owner Participation process as part of the Redevelopment process is required under state law. The attached Rules Governing Participation define this process for the National City Redevelopment Agency, i.e. CDC. Environmental Review . Financial Statement Account No STAFF RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. STRATEGIC GOAL ATTACHMENTS 1. Rules Governing Participation Resolution No. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 - RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES BY PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESS OCCUPANTS IN THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, on May 16, 1995, the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (CDC) adopted Rules Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Business Occupants in the National City Redevelopment Project ("Rules") as required by California Redevelopment Law; and WHEREAS, as approved, the Rules have caused confusion by not specifying the amount of time Owners and Occupants are provided by the CDC to submit Participation Proposals following submittal of a Statement of Interest; and WHEREAS, the CDC desires to clarify the Rules by setting 45 days as the period of time during which such Participation Proposals are to be submitted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Community Development Commission of the City of National City hereby approves an Amendment to the Rules Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Business Occupants in the National City Redevelopment Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Amendment shall insert the following language into Section VI; 600 Participation Procedures: Those submitting a Statement of Interest in Participation must, within 45 days of the submittal of the Statement of Interest, complete and submit a detailed Participation Proposal fulfilling the Submittal Requirements for Redevelopment Projects. With the foregoing exception, each and every provision of the Rules approved on May 16, 1995, shall remain in full force and effect. PASSED and ADOPTED this 15th day of July, 2008. Ron Morrison, Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM. Brad Raulston, Executive Director George H Eiser, III Legal Counsel V1, 11. LVVJ Si . JV 111.1 VI YLJJVIVV 1',u LC11 Jl.0 iJ V!IL ATTACHMENT 1 RULES 'GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES BY PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESS OCCUPANTS IN THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT SECTION I. (I00) PURPOSE AND INTENT These rules are adopted to implement the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project (the 'Project") regarding participation and the exercise of preferences by property owners and business occupants within the National City Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project Aica"). These rules set forth the procedures governing such preferences and participation. The Health and Safety Code of the State of California Section 33000 et seq. requires the adoption of these rules by the Community Development Commission of the City of National City to permit participation ty owners of real property and the extension of preferences to persons engaged in business within the boundaries of the Project Area to reenter the redeveloped area to the maximum extent feasible consistent with the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan fur the Project. SECTION II. (200) GENERAL DEFINITIONS As used herein, the following definitions apply. A. "CDC" means the Community Development Commission of the City of National City. B. `Business Occ'ipant" means any person, persons, corporation, association, partnership, or other entity engaged in a lawful business within the Project Area for so long as such Business Oceii 3ant remains in business within the Project Area. C. "City" means Lae City of National City. 01/11/2005 TUE 17:39 (JOB NO. 9i081 U1002 D "Disposit «n and Development A,grcernent" means a contractual agreement between a developer :grid the CDC that sets forth terms and conditions for development. E. "Lonp,=term Lca ;r:" means a lease of real property with a team of twenty (20) years or more, wit]•. at least ten (10) years eeraaining on such term. F. "Owner" mean:; any person, persons, corporation, association, partnership. or other entity holding recorded Fee title to or a long -tern] lease of real property in the Project Area for so long as such Ow -per holds such title or long -tern lease. "Participant" means an. Owner who has entered into a Participation Agreement with the CDC. H. "Participation Agreement" means an agreement entered into by an Owner with the CDC providing for such Owner to participate in the development or redevelopment of property within the Project Area in accordance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan and these Rules. L "Plan" means the Redevelopment Plan fox the National City Redevelopment Project adopted on by Ordinance No. J. "Project Area" rneans the Project Area of the CDC which is subject to the Redevelopment Plan, as depict on Exhibit A attached hereto. "Rules" mean: these Rules Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Business Occupants in the National City Redevelopment Project. SECTION III. (300) OPPORTUNITIES FOR OWNER PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES '1'0 BUSINESS OCCUPANTS TO RF,F.N'1'ER IN BUSINESS WITHIN REDEVELOPED AREA 2 oeio2,2ooe O 1 / 11 / 2005 TUE 17 : 39 (JUB NO. 9408 ) 0003 .i. ... fAvv.. A...VV ♦...♦ v.u...,, .., ul.., u.'l.l nl.11 WJ UV -1 A. (301) Opportunities for Owner Participation Owners of real property within the Project Area shall he extended reasonable opportunities to participate in the redevelopment of properly in the Project Area if such Owncts agree to participate in the redevelopment in conformity with the Plan and these Rules. B. (302) Preferences for Persons Errs aced in Business in the Project Area Business Occupants engaged in business in the Project Area shall be extended reasonable preference to reenter in business within the redeveloped area if they otherwise meet the requirements prescribed by the Plan and these Rules. SECTION IV. (400) METHODS OF PARTICIPATION AND LE IITATIONS TREREON A. (401) Methods of Participation Participation methods include remaining in substantially the same location either by retaining all or portions of the property, or by retaining all or portions of the property and purchasing adjacent property from the CDC or joining with another person or entity for the rehabilitation or development of the Owner's property and, if appropriate, other property, or submitting to the CDC for its consideration another method of participation proposal pursuant to these Rules. An Owner who participate in the same location may be required to rehabilitate or demolish all or a part of his/ber existing buildings, or the CDC may acquire the buildings only and then remove or demolish the buildings Participation raethods also include the CDC buying land and improvements at fair market value frueu Owners and offering other parcels for purchase and rehabilitation ur development by such Owners, or offering an opportunity for such Owners to rehabilitate or develop property jointly with other persons or entities. 3 o i /oui00► 01/11/2005 TUE 17:39 [JOB NO. 9408 ) V1004 B. (402) Limitations on Participation Opportunities Owner Participation opportunities shall he subject to and limited by factors such as hereafter li:;tcd find the following minimum requirements: 1. 'fhe Psi ticipant(s) eau demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the CDC that he is financially capable and has the qualifications and/or experience to perform any and all development, modification, rehabilitation, modernization, construction, land assembly, and/or acquisition of the subject property or properties in order that it will conform to the Plan, any specific plan or design guide, and the redevelopment proposal, if any, contemplated by the CDC with respect to the subject property. 2. The Participant's proposed improvements and/or redevelopment conform or will confornr r<r. the goals and objectives established by the: CDC; the Plan; any specific plait or design guide; any applicable zoning, building and safety laws and regulations; and/or the redevelopment proposal approved by the CDC. 3. The CUC retains its authority to determine in its sole and reasonable discretion whethe.- the proposed Participant(s) development conforms to and furthers the goals and objectives of the Plan and any specific development proposals on the basis of all the facts and circumstances pertaining to the proposed Participant's development. .vtl::nb.mmw. 4 of/o2i2ooi 01,11/2005 TIE 17:39 [JOB NO. 94081 16 005 v • ♦ • • . • •• • • • . \ . \ .. \ J ..J V [ 1 V I vc•.iaa.0 4. The CDC shall consider whether the proposed owner participant development necessitates that the Participant and/or the CDC shall remove, relocate and/or install public utilities and public facilities determined necessary by the CDC for the proposed development. 5. Consideration of the elimination and/or change of land uses, paitrcularly nonconforming land uses as specified in City codes. 6. The CI)C shall consider the need to realign, abandon, vacate, widen, or open public rights -of -way and the indirect effects of such acts. 7. Consid-ratinii of any reduction in the total number of individual parcels in the Project Area. 8. Consideration of whether the proposal involves land assembly and development of area; for public and/or private development in accordance with the Plan C. (403) Establishing Preferences Among Owners If conflicts develop between the desires of participants for particular sites or land uses, the CDC is µuthorized to exercise its reasonable discretion and establish reasonable priorities and preferences among the Participants and to determine a solution by consideration of objective facts concerning the proposals, including, for example: development e:xpericnce and qualifications, financial ability to perform, length of time in the area, accommodation of as many potential participants as possible, and conformity with intent antl purpose of the Plan. Participation, to the extent feasible, may be available for two or more persons, firms, or institutions, to join together in partnerships, corporations, ,r other joint entities. To the extent multiple owile's are included within a proposed dev.lopnieert site, an Owner with a majority interest in the total proposed 5 01io:fl00n 01/11/2005 TUE 17:39 (.1011 NU. 94081 I 000 LJ 0 development si,:e nay be determined l:y the CDC to have a preference over an Owner witi a minority ii.tcrest in the proposed develc:meet site. SE. TtOI's V. (500) METHODS FOR EXTENDING REENTRY PREFERENCES, AND LIMI FAT IONS THEREON A. (501) Methods for lixtendinj Reentry Preferences Wt..enever a Business Occupant will displaced by CDC action from the Project Area, the CDC will, prior to such displacernent, determine: 1) whether such Business Occupant desir.ts to relocate directly to another location within the Project Arca, or 2) if suitable relocation acc;rnrrrlodations within the Project Area are not available prior to displacement, whether such Business Occupant would desire to reenter in business within the Project Arta at a later date should suitably: accommodations become available. For those Business Occupants who desire to relocate directly to another location within the Project Arca, the CDC will make reasonable efforts to assist such Business Occupants to find accommodations suitable to their needs. A record of the Business Occupants who cannot be or do not want to be directly relocated within the proposed development site, but who have stated that they desire to reenter into business in the Project Area whenever suitable locations and rents are available, will be maintained by the CDC. The CDC will make reasonrhlc efforts to assist such Business Occupants to find reentry accommodations at locations and rents suitable to their needs. In order to implement the operation of this Section 501, the CDC will provide in all Participation A;.zeements, disposition and development agreements, and other agreements, a;. applicable, that in the renting or leasing of premises rehabilitated or developed pursuant to such agreemcnts the Participant or developer will give reasonable preferences (over other potential tenants or lessees) to Business Occupants who will be or who have been displaced from their places of business by the CDC to lease or rent premises with •r the newly rehabilitated or developed facilities. ..rk:,horyui 6 o vovza0 i 01/11/2005 TIE 17:39 I.10B O. 941181 [21007 �.�/�• Lt , 1n,J 4"VI! 0 13. (507) Limitations on the Extension of Preferences The following are the minimum requirements that must be met by any business to establish its eliG;ibility for the reasonable preference to reenter in business in the Project Area after displacement: 1. The business use proposed shall be consistent with the land use standards of the Plan and any specific plan and development standards and criteria adopted by the CDC or the City. 2. The iur,rovcment on the business premises made or proposed to be made shall (unless otherwise approved by the CDC) meet, or shall be brought up to meet, a structural condition equal to or better than that required for a new structure or improvement of equivalent size, location, use and occupancy as required by the building and safety laws and regulations then applicable in the City, and shall confotni to the Plan. 3. The business operator shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the CDC that he is financially capable and qualified to perform any and all modifications or rehabilitation or modernization on the property at the new location in order that it will coaforrtt to the Plan and capable of meeting the financial requirements to occupy space in the new location. 4 The business shall agree in writing that in the use, occupancy and conduct of business in the premises there shall be no discrunination because of race, sex, marital status, color, creed, religion, national origin, ancestry, sexual orientation, physical handicap, or medical cotndition. fti'•Wo-°m 01/020001 01/11,2005 '1'11E 17:39 [JOB Nt). A408 1 7100S C. (503 j E;,tablishinZ2references Arn.snBusiness Occupants Seeking Similar. Preferences If conflicts develcp between the des.res of participants fur particular sits or land uses, the CDC is authorl::eli to exercise its reasonable discretion and establish reasonable priorities and preferences F.rnong the Business Occupants and to determine a solution by consideration of objective facts concerning the proposals, including, for example: financial ability to perform, length of time in the area, accommodation of as many potential Businf.ss Occupants as possible, appropriateness of the type of business within the proposed premises or location.. the feasibility of business success, and conformity with intent and purpose of these Rides and the Plan. Participation, to the extent feasible, may be available for two or more persons, firms or institutions, to join together in partnerships, coTpor ations, or other joint entities. SECTION 'VI. t 600) PARTICIPATION PROCEDURES A. (601) Notice and Statement of Interest Before enterin 3 into any Participation Agreements or Disposition and Development Agreements relating to the acquisition, development, or rehabilitation of real property in the Project Area, the CDC shall first comply with these Rules relating to soliciting intere t in owner participation from Owners of property, which may be acquired, developed, or rehabilitated and call upon them to submit a Statement of interest for Participation incorporated herein as Exhibit B, in the proposed development or in otherwise participating in the redevelopment of the Project Area. Those desiring to submit a Statement of Interest in Participation must complete and submit said Staernent to the CDC' within forty-five (45) days of receipt. Any owner may also submit such a Statement at auy time before such notification Such Statement shall include information requested by the CDC and shall be in the form requested by the CDC. nallrv,lor.p 4 8 o v07iiam 01/11/2005 TUE 17:39 (JOB NO. 94081 (6009 v1. ll0 aVVJ 11.an CAA. ULOLJJ01VV LOU ue111,1 11 The CDC shall consider such Statements as are submitted on time and shall seek to develop reasonable participation for those submitting such Statements whether to stay in place or to move to another location. The CDC may in its sole discretion determine that a participation proposal is not feasihle or in the best interest of the Project or the community, or :.s otherwise limited by one or more of the criteria set forth in Section 402 hereof. In su.th event, the CDC may select a developer from among prospective participants submitting statements of interest in participating and others invited to submit proposals. The CDC retains and shall exercise the discretion vested in it by law to consider and determine whether the proposal or proposals for redevelopment submitted by an Owner or Owners for participation in the Project Area conforms to, and meets the goals and objectives of, the Plan. The CDC shall exercise said discretion reasonably, in good faith, and without discriuunation. B. (602) Participation Agreements 1. (603) General Public and private Owners wishing to develop or improve their properties within the Project Area may be required, as a condition to CDC approval of such development, to enter into a binding written Participation Agreement with the CDC if the CDC determines it is necessary to impose upon such property any of the standards, restrictions and controls of the Plan, or of any design guide adopted by the CDC pursuant to the Plan. (604) Contents A Participation Agreement shall obligate the Owner, and the Owner's heirs, successors and assigns to acquire., rehabilitate, develop and use the property, as may be .applicable, in confomiance with the Plan and/or to be subject to such other 9 01/07/2001 01/11/2005 TIIE 17:30 [Jun NO. 9408 1 10010 111i 1 I / l .•tY 'A., provisions and conditions o the I'lar. as the CDC may require for the period of time that the Plan is in force and effect, excepting those provisions related to non(Usc.irn::_Lation and nonsc;regition wluch shall run in perpetuity. Each Participation Agreement will contain such terms and conditions and wilt require tale: potential Partci.zaat to join in the recordation of such documents as the CDC nay require in oroe( to insure the property will be acquired, rehahilitaxd, developed 3n:l used ii1 accord with the Plan and the agreement. Participation Agreements will be affective only if approved by a majority vote of the member:; of the CDC. SECTION VII. 700) ENFORCEMENT In the event a property is not acquired, developed, iehabilitatcd, or used in conformance with the Plan, with a CDC determination of conform ince, or a Participation Agreement, then the CDC is authv!ized to (1) purchase the property, (2'; purchase any interest in the property sufficient to obtain conformance, or (3) take any other appropriate actinu sufficient to obtain such conformance. The CDC shall not acquire real property retained or developed under an approved Participation Agreement tf the Participant fully performs under the agreement. SECTION VII. (800) AMENDMENT OF RULES The CDC !nay amend these rules at any regular meting or duly called special meeting held after their adoption, but only after notice to the CDC members and the public. fhe text of the proposed change shall be made available and notice of said meeting shall he published in a newspaper of general circulation. Such notice shall be published at least fourteen (14) calendar days before the date of the meeting at w vch the proposed amendment will he consideu:d. The method of notice is at fie discretion of the CDC. 10 UI/UL200i 01/11/2005 TUE 17:3 [JOB Nil. 9408 l 0(111 • VV1I VC l.lbl.11 I(/JUIL No such amendment ;hall retroactively impair the rights of any parties who have executed Participation Agreements with the CDC in reliance upon these rules as presently constituted. chin• Wm rpm t 11 01/f17r2QQ1 01/11/2005 TUI: 17:39 (.InR NO. 94081 Z012 EXII]IBIT A F'ROJEc"r 01/11/2005 TI'G 17:39 (JOB NU. 940. ) 16013 . rl I \ ll'1'�/ OM 11VI LVl v 1" t COMMO5LON Ir OF TM CAIN at; NATIONAL Llf'Y NAtional City Redevelopment Project Area ea I II u` l: p l: . _ i II_, ,::.1.1 ,I 'l• . . I I. I,. Il II1.1 11 44. ailt1IIIIII 111I1 u1IuIIiI11IlI11)1111i11I`111I11lI:liII l 11[I-,1:- •,.... �Y111 Imo b 4� n I 1 1177111n uu,i 1 i.JI. f'1 • �[ I -IIIII1 111 , •lr:.�t�• :rl,r 1 .q;,;. j ` I li It •'l`11i�1j�1 .� II �Y�4�f- Jam,... 111 i r. 1. k A 6.. UJS 1 iron 1111l1 `E XT[IBY B S'TATENTENT OF INTEREST �.r 01/11/2005 TU'E 17:39 t JOB NO. 94O 1 kj015 Vial l/LUUJ 1/ :40 YA.\ h12IZ.57J1VU non per'scn 10018 STAail/CENT OF fNTEREST FOR PARTICIPAT[ON IN TEE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT 1 hereby express my int :test in participating in the National City Rcdcvciopmeut Project: 1. Name of Property Ownctffenaat: Phone; Z. Home Address: 3. Address of Property owned or rented in the Project Area: Name ofbusinms in the Project Area: Phone: 3. I own ( ); ant a tenant ( ); and wish to rehabilitate ( ); build ( ); sell ( ) my present propertyif tenant, indicare: month -in -mouth ( ); or lease ( ); expiration date of lease:_ 6. My present type of business is: Nature of pro•i oscd participation: I understand that suamission of this Statement of Interest does not to any '.gay obligate me to participate 'in he Prcject.. Signer: Title. Cate: Return to: Community Devebomcat commission of Me City ufNational City 140 Ent lath Street Suite S Yational Ciry. California 919:3 01/11/2005 TOE 17:39 [JOB NO. 9408) 1016 RESOLUTION NO. 95-23 RESOLtJTION OF THE COMMUNITY, DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION of THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADOPTING RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES BY PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESS OCCUPANTS IN THE NATIONAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (NCRP) WEEREAS, the Community Development Commission of the City of National City (CDC) has prepared a Redevelopment Plan for the National City Redevelopment Project (NCRP) which includes a provision for the use of Eminent Domain in certain designated areas; and, WHEREAS, the Rules for Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Business Occupants (RULES) are required to be adopted by the CDC if Eminent Domain is used Lo acquire property; and, WHEREAS, the Rules have been prepared that accord property owners fair and reasonable treatment and preferences if they are displaced from the Redevelopment Project Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BB IT RESOLVED, by the Community Development Comm scion of the City of National City, that the Chairman is hereby authorized to adopt the Rules, attached as Exhibit "A", for use when a property is purchased by Eminent Domain in the NCRP. PARSED and ADOPTED this 16th day of May 1995. ATT Paul •esro ers, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: v✓ George H. Eiser, III City -CDC Attorney �01 c1al�-� George 1 Waters, Chairman 01/11/2005 TI.E 17:J9 (.IOR NO. 9408) 16017 ITEM #28 7-15-08 GRAFFITI SERVICES PROGRAM UPDATE - NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES - ITEM # 29 7-15-08 STAFFING UPDATE - POLICE -