HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009 07-21 CC CDC AGENDA PKTAgenda Of A Regular Meeting - National City City Council /
Community Development Commission of the City of National City
Council Chambers
Civic Center
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, California
Regular Meeting - Tuesday — July 21, 2009 — 6:00 P.M.
Open To The Public
Please complete a request to speak form prior to the commencement of the meeting and submit it to
the City Clerk.
It is the intention of your City Council and Community Development Commission (CDC) to be receptive
to your concerns in this community. Your participation in local government will assure a responsible and
efficient City of National City. We invite you to bring to the attention of the City Manager/Executive
Director any matter that you desire the City Council or Community Development Commission Board to
consider. We thank you for your presence and wish you to know that we appreciate your involvement.
ROLL CALL
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag by Mayor Ron Morrison
Public Oral Communications (Three -Minute Time Limit)
NOTE: Pursuant to state law, items requiring Council or Community Development Commission action must be
brought back on a subsequent Council or Community Development Commission Agenda unless they are of a
demonstrated emergency or urgent nature.
Upon request, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability in
compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please contact the City Clerk's Office at (619) 336-4228 to
request a disability -related modification or accommodation. Notification 24-hours prior to the meeting will enable
the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
Spanish audio interpretation is provided during Council and Community Development Commission Meetings. Audio
headphones are available in the lobby at the beginning of the meetings.
Audio interpretacion en espanol se proporciona durante sesiones del Consejo Municipal. Los audiofonos
estan disponibles en el pasillo al principio de la junta.
Council Requests That All CeII Phones
And Pagers Be Turned Off During City Council Meetings
COPIES OF THE CITY COUNCIL OR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION MEETING AGENDAS AND MINUTES
MAY BE OBTAINED THROUGH OUR WEBSITE AT www.nationalcityca.g
CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA
7/21/2009 - Page 2
PROCLAMATIONS r.00+1
1. Proclaiming Thursday, July 23, 2009 as: "SOUTH COUNTY ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 20TH ANNIVERSARY DAY"
2. Proclaiming Thursday, July 23, 2009 as: "CORPORAL DONALD 'DON'
SMITH DAY"
PRESENTATIONS
3. Presentation - National City Police Explorers (Police Chief)
4. City Council Student Representatives:
— Outgoing — Evita Pineda and Marcos Martinez
— Incoming — Michael Mendoza and Christina Dickey (Mayor/Council)
5. Introduction of the National City Girls & Boys State participants.
CITY COUNCIL
CONSENT CALENDAR
Consent Calendar: Consent calendar items involve matters, which are of a routine
or noncontroversial nature. All consent calendar items are adopted by approval of a
single motion by the City Council. Prior to such approval, any item may be removed
from the consent portion of the agenda and separately considered, upon request of
a Councilmember, a staff member, or a member of the public.
6. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular City Council/Community Development
Commission Meetings of May 19, 2009 and June 2, 2009. (City Clerk)
7. Approval of a motion to waive reading of the text of the Ordinances considered
at this meeting and provides that such Ordinances shall be introduced and/or
adopted after a reading of the title only. (City Clerk)
CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA
7/21/2009 - Page 3
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
8. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National approving an Amendment
to the contract between the City and Dokken Engineering (the consultant) in the
not -to -exceed amount of $55,000 for Plaza Boulevard Widening Project and
authorizing the Mayor to execute the Amendment. (Funding through Federal
STP, Local TransNet and Capital Outlay Funds) (Engineering)
9. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving Amendment
#1 to the Agreement with Wade & Associates for project management for the
Soccer Field Project in the amount not -to -exceed $26,552, and authorizing the
Mayor to execute Amendment #1. (Funding available in the CDBG funds)
(Engineering)
10. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City ratifying Change Order
No. 24 to the contract with Koch -Armstrong General Engineering, Inc. in the
amount of $27,835.00 to add a missing sidewalk and a retaining wall on the
north side of Sweetwater Road, east of Prospect Street within and as requested
by the County of San Diego for the National City Street Resurfacing Project, FY
08-09 (Phase 2). (Funded by County Funds through a general fund revenue
account) (Engineering)
11. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City ratifying Change Order
No. 1 to the contract with MJC construction Company in the amount of
$15,600.00 to provide ADA restroom improvements and upgrades to the
Kimball Park men's and women's center restrooms for the National City Parks
Rehabilitation Furnishings Project. (Funding through General Fund).
(Engineering)
12. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City accepting the revised
Target Employment Area (TEA) for the San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone.
(Housing & Grants)
13. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the San
Diego Regional Enterprise Zone Boundary Modifications. (Community
Development/Housing and Grants)
CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA
7/21/2009 - Page 4
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.) 'r/
14. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the 30-day
review and public comment of the National City Police Department's grant
application toward the purchase of police vehicles, electronic police vehicles, in -
vehicle cameras, still and video cameras, vehicle tracking system, police
accessories and outreach supplies, video surveillance vehicle, video projectors,
tasers and a mobile CAD system for the Police Department utilizing $35,821.00
from the FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Local Solicitation Program. (Police)
15. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City approving the salary
ranges for two new classifications within the National City Municipal Employees'
Association Salary Schedule: Accountant Trainee ($3,207.45 - $3,898.70,
monthly) and Management Analyst Trainee ($3,358.85 - $4,082.69, monthly).
(Human Resources)
16. WARRANT REGISTER #52
Warrant Register #52 for the period of 06/17/09 through 06/23/09 in the amount of
$1,035,713.64. (Finance)
17. WARRANT REGISTER #53
Warrant Register #53 for the period of 06/24/09 through 06/30/09 in the
amount of $1,733,936.16. (Finance)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
18. Continued Public Hearing to consider a Proposed Negative Declaration and a
7-Lot Residential Tentative Subdivision Map including requests for exceptions
for increased density, reduced lot sizes and lot frontage; variance requests to
allow 3-story structures for 2-units, 3-foot side yard setbacks for 3-units, and
16.5-foot front yard setbacks for 4-units; and a request to waive utility
undergrounding fronting Prospect Street at 2121 Grove Street. (Applicant:
Arnold Schmidt) (Case File No. 2007-59 S, IS, Z) (Planning Division)
CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA
7/21/2009 - Page 5
PUBLIC HEARINGS (Cont.)
19. Public Hearing to consider the report required by California Health and Safety
Code Section 5473, et. seq. pertaining to collection of sewer charges on the
tax roll, directing the City Clerk to file said report with the San Diego County
Auditor, and directing the Finance Director to certify with the San Diego County
Auditor the "Sewer Service Charge Fund." Sewer service fees will not
increase for FY09-10. (Public Works) **Companion Rem #21**
URGENCY ORDINANCE FOR ADOPTION
20. An Interim Ordinance of the City Council of the City of National City adopted
pursuant to Government Code Section 65858 as an urgency measure to take
effect immediately, enacting a moratorium prohibiting establishments
dispensing marijuana for medical purposes in National City. (City Attorney)
NON CONSENT RESOLUTIONS
21. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City adopting the report
required by California Health and Safety Code Section 5473, et seq. pertaining
to collection of sewer charges on the tax roll, directing the City Clerk to file said
report with the San Diego County Auditor, and directing the Finance Director to
certify with the San Diego County Auditor the "Sewer Service Charge Fund."
Sewer service fees will not increase for FY09-10. (Public Works) **Companion
Item #19**
22. Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City reducing the Library
General Obligation Bond Tax rate for Fiscal year 2009-2010 from 1.30 cents per
$100 of assessed valuation to 1.27 cents. (Finance)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CONSENT CALENDAR
23. Authorize the reimbursement of Community Development Commission
expenditures in the amount of $688,833.02 to the City of National City for the
period of 06/17/09 through 06/23/09. (Finance)
CITY COUNCIL/COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA
7/21/2009 - Page 6
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
24. Authorize the reimbursement of Community Development Commission
expenditures in the amount of $259,989.87 to the City of National City for the
period of 06/24/09 through 06/30/09. (Finance)
NEW BUSINESS
25. Real property transaction for former Days Inn site: 1.07-acre parcel located at
1640 East Plaza Boulevard. (A.P.N. 557-410-200) (City Attorney)
STAFF REPORTS
26. Development Services Group Update (Development)
27. Closed Session Report (City Attorney)
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL ,,.io
ADJOURNMENT
Next Regular City Council and Community Development Commission Meeting -
Tuesday — August 4, 2009 - 5:00 p.m. — Council Chambers - National City.
**Due to "National Night Out" beginning at 6:00 p.m. on August 4, 2009,
this regular adjourned Council meeting will begin at 5:00 p.m.**
Francisco"' "'Ink" Parra
Councilmember
ITEM #1
i 7/21/09
"' I I' . ti *kT1f \ :-
WHEREAS, the South County Economic Development Council (SCEDC) has served the region for
20 years in a responsible deliberate manner: and
WHEREAS, SCEDC. a non-profit organization, is comprised of business, government and
community leaders from throughout the region; and
WHEREAS, SCEDC promotes economic prosperity in the bi-national region continuously searching
for opportunities such as the cross border terminal; and
WHEREAS, SCEDC is the voice of South County continuously advocating for transportation
infrastructure, enhanced education opportunities and business enhancement capabilities like the
Enterprise Zone and their revolving loan pool; and
WHEREAS, SCEDC encourages public and private investment in the South County region and
enhances job creation and retention efforts; and
WHEREAS, SCEDC promotes the cultural, educational, social and geographical opportunities in
South County: and
WHEREAS, SCEDC enhances communication between the business community and government
officials:
THEREFORE, as Mayor and City Council, by virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of
National City, do hereby proclaim "[hursday Jul 23, 2009 as:
SOUTH COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
20r1 ANNIVERSARY DAY
We call upon all citizens of National City to take a moment to commemorate the South County
Economic Development Council (SCEDC for their 209' Anniversary.
Ron Morrison
Mayor
e j ; dra Sole o-Solis
Vice Mayor
Rosalie G.
Councilw
WHEREAS, Corporal Donald "Don" Smith has been a National City Police Officer for over 40 years and will
officially retire from the National City Police Department (NCPD) on Wednesday. July I, 2009; and
WHEREAS, during Don's career he has been known for his ability to relate and communicate with young
people: and
WHEREAS, Don has volunteered as an Explorer Advisor since he was hired in 1968; and
WHEREAS, Don's 40 years of service as an Explorer advisor have made him a corner stone of a very
successful National City Explorer program; and
WHEREAS, Don has spent countless hours of his own time as an Explorer Advisor attending weekly
meetings, assisting at the annual Explorer Academies, chaperoning social outings, field trips, fund raisins and
trainings; and
WHEREAS, Don believes that the Explorer program helps young people build vital life long values and
characteristics such as teamwork, discipline, confidence and responsibility: and
WHEREAS. from 1977 thru 1989 Don served as a School Resource Officer: and
WHEREAS, Don assisted in the implementation of the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (D.A.R.l.)
program and taught the curriculum for a few years until he transferred out of school assignment: and
WHEREAS, Don was also a member of the Department Range Staff he served as a Range Master and
Armorer. Ile was well respected for his ability to teach sound shooting techniques and expert knowledge of all
types of firearms. Many officers were trained how to shoot correctly and safely by Don's patient and skillful
instruction: and
WHEREAS, As Corporal Donald "Don" Smith closes in on his retirement there is no doubt that a big part of
his police legacy will be the value he placed on being involved with kids and the devotion he gave for 40 years
as a Police Explorer Advisor and School Resource Officer,
THEREFORE, as Mayor and City Council, by virtue of the authority vested in us by the City of National
City, do hereby proclaim Thursday, July 23, 2009 as:
CORPORAL DONALD "DON" SMITH DAY
We call upon all citizens of National City take a moment to recognize Corporal Donald "Don" Smith for his
longtime commitment and leadership to e City of National City.
r^7
Ron Morrison
Mayor
o-Solis
Vice Mayor
,Lk
to
an
Francisco "Frank" Parra
('ounciimember
Jess Van Deventer
.327
Councilmember
ITEM #2
7/21/09
ITEM #3
7/21/09
On June 27th and June 28, the National City Police Explorers competed
in the 2nd Annual "San Diego County Explorer Competition". Thirteen
(13) Explorer Posts attended the competition — consisting of
Police/Sheriff Explorer Posts and Border Patrol Explorer Posts, some
from Arizona.
There were a total of fourteen (14) scenarios — some were - Border
Patrol Checkpoint, Active Shooter, Officer Down, Unknown Traffic Stop,
DUI (Driving Under the Influence), Building Entry, Obstacle Course, 5K,
Police Bike Course.
The National City Police Explorer Post placed in 8 of the 14 scenarios.
ITEM #4
7/21 /09
CITY COUNCIL STUDENT REPRESENTATIVES:
- OUTGOING - EVITA PINEDA AND MARCOS MARTINEZ
- INCOMING - MICHAEL MENDOZA AND CHRISTINA DICKEY
(MAYOR/COUNCIL)
ITEM #5
7/21/09
INTRODUCTION OF THE NATIONAL CITY
GIRLS & BOYS STATE PARTICIPANTS
ITEM #6
7/21/09
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR CITY
COUNCIUCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
COMMISSION MEETINGS OF
MAY 19, 2009 AND JUNE 2, 2009.
(CITY CLERK)
City of National City
Office of the City Clerk
1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950-4397
Michael R. Dalla, CMC - City Clerk
(619) 336-4228 Fax: (619) 336-4229
To: Honorable Mayor and Council
From: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
Subject: Ordinance Introduction and Adoption
ITEM #7
7/21/09
It is recommended that the City Council approve the following motion as part of
the Consent Calendar:
"That the City Council waive reading of the text of all
Ordinances considered at this meeting and provide that such
Ordinances shall be introduced and/or adopted after a
reading of only the title."
® Recycled Paper
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
%.,„eETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO.
8
1 ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of National City approving an Amendment to the contract between
the City and Dokken Engineering (the Consultant) in the not -to -exceed amount of $55,000 for Plaza Boulevard
Widening project and authorizing the Mayor to execute the amendment (Funding through Federal STP, Local
TransNet and Capital Outlay Funds.)
PREPARED BY Din Daneshfar DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4387
EXPLANATION
See attached explanation.
J
Environmental Review X N/A MIS Approval
Financial Statement Approved By:
Funds are available through STP funds Account No.312-409-500-598-6569, TransNet funds Finance Director
Account No. 307-409-500-598-6569 and Local Capital Outlay funds
Account No. 103-409-500-598-6569.
Account No
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resoluti9.,/ •
BOARD / COMMI 'SION RECOMMED ION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
1. Resolution
T.Amendment
Resolution No.
A-200 (Rev 7/03)
EXPLANATION:
On November 21, 20006 a Contract was approved between Dokken
Engineering firm and the City in the total amount of $1,101,000 to provide
engineering design and right of way acquisition services for the Street
Widening Improvements on Plaza Boulevard from Highland Avenue to
Euclid Avenue.
The preliminary engineering and environmental clearance of project
completed. The City's Consultant has completed the final design package.
On April 21, 2009 by Resolution No. 2009-81, the first Amendment was
approved for a not -to -exceed amount of $20,000 to perform staking work for
individual owners as needed.
The second amendment is needed for the addition to the scope of work for
Dokken Engineering. The additional work has been generated by the
request to perform right of way acquisition services for 38 appraisals of
properties impacted by the widening project. Originally, the preparation of
offer packages, negotiations, and coordination of escrows for 31 property
owners were included in the scope of services. During the design process,
four additional parcels were added (the original estimate was based on
information available in the EIR and preliminary engineering). During the
appraisal process, it was determined by the appraiser that one owner who
owns four properties would require separate appraisals for each parcel,
rather than one appraisal. This resulted in 7 more negotiations than the
original scope. Also reflected in the amendment is the revision of three
temporary impact areas to an improved sidewalk, a deletion of a temporary
staging area, and an addition of a temporary staging area.
The purpose of the resolution is to approve an Amendment to the contract
between the City and Dokken Engineering in the not -to -exceed amount of
$55,000 to perform the additional work.
With this amendment the total contract amount will increase to $1,176,000.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH
DOKKEN ENGINEERING TO PERFORM
ADDITIONAL RIGHT — OF — WAY WORK FOR
THE PLAZA BOULEVARD WIDENING PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City and Dokken Engineering (the "Consultant") entered into an
Agreement on November 21, 2006 wherein the Consultant agreed to perform civil engineering
and right -of way acquisition services for the Plaza Boulevard Widening Project (the "Project");
and
WHEREAS, an amendment to the Agreement was entered into on April 21, 2009
wherein the consultant agreed to provide staking work for individual properties for the Project:
and
WHEREAS, the City desires, and the Consultant has agreed to perform,
additional right-of-way acquisition services for the Project, at a cost not to exceed $55,000.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute a Second Amendment to Agreement with
Dokken Engineering to perform additional right-of-way acquisition services for the Plaza
Boulevard Widening Project. Said Second Amendment to Agreement is on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of January, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
ADMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AND DOKKEN ENGINEERING
This Amendment to Agreement is entered into this 21st day of July 2009, by and
between the City of National City, a municipal corporation ("the CITY"), and Dokken
Engineering (the "CONSULTANT").
RECITALS
A. The CITY and the CONSULTANT entered into an agreement on the Street
Widening Improvements on Plaza Boulevard from Highland to Euclid
Avenues ("the Agreement") wherein the CONSULTANT agreed to provide
Civil Engineering and Right -of -Way Acquisition Services.
B. An Amendment in the not -to -exceed amount of $20,000 was approved on
April 21, 2009 to provide as -needed staking work for individual properties.
C. The parties desire to amend the Agreement to perform additional Right of
Way Acquisition work , as needed (See attached Exhibit A).
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement entered into on
November 21, 2006 shall be amended by $55,000 (Not -to -Exceed).
The parties further agree that with the foregoing exception, each and every term
and provision of the Agreement dated November 21, 2006, shall remain in full force and
effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date
and year first above written.
CTTY OF NATIONAL CITY DOKKEN ENGINEERING
By: By:
Ron Morrison, Mayor Chris Johnson, ce President
By:
Ca y Chan, S
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
'ift.. City Attorney
DE
DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Transportation Solutions from Concept to Construction
EXHIBIT "A"
May 19, 2009
Din Daneshfar, P.E.
Department of Public Works
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950-4301
Subject: Budget Amendment Plaza Boulevard Widening Project
Dear Mr. Daneshfar,
This letter provides a request for an addition to the scope of work and a budget
amendment for Dokken Engineering (DE) for the items of work summarized below.
The additional work has been generated by the request to perform right of way
acquisition services for 38 appraisals of properties impacted by the widening project.
Originally, the preparation of offer packages, negotiations, and coordination of escrows
for 31 property owners were included in the scope of services. During the design
process, four additional parcels were added. During the appraisal process, it was
determined by the appraiser that one owner who owns four properties would require
separate appraisals for each parcel, rather than one appraisal. This resulted in 7 more
negotiations than the original scope.
A Fee Schedule has been included, using rates that were agreed to in the original
contract.
Scope of Supplemental Work
Additional items of work have been required as part of the Plaza Boulevard Widening
Project.
Task 1.0 Project Management: Consultant will manage coordination with property
owners, appraisers, and bank escrows to acquire properties for the proposed widening
of Plaza Boulevard.
Task 2.0 Right of Way Acquisition
Task 2.1 Appraisals: Consultant will provide Preliminary Title Reports, Real
Estate Appraisals, and Appraisal Reviews of 7 additional properties. Consultant
will provide furniture, fixture and equipment appraisals, goodwill appraisals, and
shall provide business and residential relocation services. Consultant will work
closely with the City and Caltrans to obtain approval of the appraisals and
authorization for offers to be presented.
5675 Ruffin Road, Suite 250, San Diego, CA 92123 • I'ele: 858.514.8377 • Fax: 858.514.8608 • www.dokkencnginecring.com
x
DOKKEN ENGINEERING
Transportation Solutions from Concept to Coustr►►ctio►i
Task 2.2 Negotiations: Consultant will prepare and deliver offer letters,
negotiate with affected property owners until either a settlement is reached, or it
is apparent that a settlement cannot be reached. If a settlement is reached,
Consultant will oversee the escrow function through closing, including relocation
as required to deliver the property to the City free of tenancy issues. If a
settlement cannot be reached, Consultant will assist the City Attorney as required
during the eminent domain process.
Proposed Scope of Work — Supplemental Work Fee Summary
Task 1
Task 2
Sincerely,
Chris Johnson, I
Project Management
Right of Way Acquisition
$ 17,429
$ 37,571
TOTAL, NOT TO EXCEED $ 55,000
EERING Accepted and Approved by:
Din Daneshfar, P.E.
Project Manager City Project Manager
5675 Ruffin Road, Suite 250, San Diego, CA 92123 • Tele: 858.514.8377 • Fax: 858.514.8608 • www.dokkenengineering.com
Plaza Blvd Widening - Amendment 2
Dokken Engineering
Wiggans Group
14.2°0
85.8%
$7,834.07
$47,165.93
TOTAL, NOT TO EXCEED:
S55,000.00
DE
DOKKEN
ENOINE• E R I N G
w ww• dolrLrn♦•9clnrerin Q,eom
E PROPOSAL - Plaza Blvd Widening - • mendment 2
Dokkea Erjgifl isri:tig,,`'
DIRECT COSTS (LABOR
NAME
FUNCTION
HOURS
RATE
AMOUNT
Chris Johnson, PE
Project Manager
12
$64.00
$768.00
Glen Parker, PE
Project Engineer (Roadway)
20
$45.00
$900.00
Mark Firger, PE
Associate Engineer, PE
24
$40.00
$960.00
56
INDIRECT COSTS (OVERHEAD)
OVERHEAD
TOTAL LABOR
171.00%
$2,628.00
DIRECT COSTS
Billed at Actual Cost
TOTAL OVERHEAD
ITEM
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT COST
AMOUNT
$0.00
$4,493.88
FEE (PROFIT) PERCENTAGE
10%
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$0.00
FEE $712.19
DOKKEN ENGINEERING TOTAL COST
$7,834.07
DOKKEN
ENGINEER ING
w w Uotr one10in Plrin a, o om
FEE PROPOSAL - Plaza Blvd Widening - Amendment 2
'wtsoiderAit
DIRECT COSTS (LABOR
NAME
FUNCTION
HOURS
RATE
AMOUNT
Jane Wiggans
Project Manager
158
$41.00
$6,478.00
Senior R/W Agent
158
$35.75
$5,648.50
Administration
130
$18.00
$2,340.00
TOTAL HOURS
INDIRECT COSTS (OVERHEAD)
OVERHEAD
446.00
TOTAL LABOR
155.00%
$14,466.50
DIRECT COSTS
Billed at Actual Cost
TOTAL OVERHEAD $22,423.08
ITEM
Unit
QTY
UNIT COST
AMOUNT
Preliminary Title Reports (4 additional reports
558.091.07, 558.091-18, 558-091-19, 557-310-19
Lump sum
1
$3,150.00
$3,150.00
Appraisal Amendment Letter (revised
acquistions on 557-380-50, BDI)
EA
1
$250.00
$437.40
Appraisal Amendment Letter (revised
acquistions on 557-410-27, Thrifty)
EA
1
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
Appraisal Amendment Letter (revised
acquistions on 557-420-30, AI-Bayati)
EA
1
$1,500.00
S1,500.00
FEE (PROFIT) PERCENTAGE 10%
TOTAL DIRECT COSTS
$6,587.40
FEE $3,688.96
TOTAL COST
x
$47,165.93
DOKKEN
ENGINEERING
xr+w• dolr2rnc3giorcring.rom
Plaza Blvd Widening -
Amendment 2
_ 1.i
rta : r hr r
M.
i
i
I
I
a.
g
I
-
�Tuk10Proliothlo9men4"::4✓;.;�'?67
1.,sEf.N‘x::Lw
—an �;ck
-U�;,gs*
,ax r-
ye-e6�n'
iA{a
w"rAtf
Rs�-40t
a&4�r�<:i
Task 1.1 Protect Management
4
4
8
8
8
10
26
34
Task 1.2 Prolect Coordination
4
12
16
32
40
40
20
100
132
TOTAL HOURS • Task 1
8
16
16
40
48
48
30
126
166
TOTAL COST • Task1
5152627
S2,14632
$1,907.84
S5580.43
$5.520.24
$4,813.38
51,514.70
$11,848.32\
-.- :
$17,428.75
AISRIP449
Tbkk2z0.Rt"phlotYYay.A09u4MloR 'y Vfc agt0-
W,?'At
t"-4tVig4
'g9e
5',1
Task 2.1 Appraisals
0
20
10
30
30
Task 2.2 Negotiations
4
4
8
16
90
100
100
290
306
TOTAL HOURS• TASK
4
4
8
16
110
110
100
320\
336
TOTAL COST• TASK 2
5763.14
$538.58
5953.92
$2,253.64
512,650.55
$11,030.86
55,049.00
S28,730.21
530,983.85
TOTAL PROJECT HOURS
12
20
24
56
158
158
130
446
502
DIRECT COSTS
50 00
56,587.40
50.00
TOTAL, NOT TO EXCEED PROJECT COST
$2,289.41
$2,682 90
52,881.76
$7,834.07
518,170.79
$15,844.04
56,583.70
347,165.93
555.000,00
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
skrwiEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO.
9
ITEM TITLE Resolution of the City Council of National City approving amendment #1 to the agreement
with Wade & Associates for project management for the Soccer Field Project in the amount not -to -exceed
$26,552 and authorizing the Mayor to execute amendment #1. Funds are available in the CDBG Funds.
PREPARED BY Barby Tipton DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4583
EXPLANATION
On August 8, 2008, the City entered into an agreement with Wade & Associates for project management
services for the Soccer Field Project in the not -to -exceed amount of $24,191.80.
Several issues with the project have dictated the need for additional services in the not -to -exceed amount of
$26,552. With approval of this amendment the total amount of authorized work will be $50,743.80.
The purpose of this resolution is to approve additional services and authorize the Mayor to execute the
amendment #1 to the agreement.
}
Environmental Review X N/A
MIS Approval
Financial Statement
Approved By:
Funds are available in expenditure account 301-409-500-598-4076
inance Director
Account No. 301-409-500-598-4076
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
A. - s= esolution.
AD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
I ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. Resolution
2. Agreement Amendment #1 (2 copies)
A-200 (Rev. 7/03)
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT
NO. 1 TO THE AGREEMENT WITH WADE
& ASSOCIATES FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT
SERVICES FOR THE SOCCER FIELD PROJECT
IN THE AMOUNT NOT -TO -EXCEED $26,552
WHEREAS, on August 8, 2008, the City entered into an Agreement (the
"Agreement") with Wade & Associates (the "Consultant") for project management services for
the Soccer Field Project in the not -to -exceed amount of $24,191.80; and
WHEREAS, several issues with the project have dictated the need for additional
services of the consultant in the not -to -exceed amount of $26,552, and City staff recommends
approval of Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement in order to obtain these additional services,
with a not -to -exceed amount of $26,552.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby authorizes the Mayor to execute Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement with
Wade & Associates for project management services for the Soccer Field Project in an amount
not -to -exceed $26,552.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Della, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
AMENDMENT 1 TO AGREEMENT
BY AND BETWEEN
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AND
WADE & ASSOCIATES
This Amendment #1 to Agreement is entered into this 21S1 day of July, 2009, by and
between the City of National City, a municipal corporation ("CITY"), and Wade & Associates a
project management firm (the "CONSULTANT").
RECITALS
A. The CITY and the CONSULTANT entered into an agreement on August 8, 2008
("the Agreement"), wherein the CONSULTANT agreed to provide Project
Management services for the Soccer Field with a not -to -exceed amount of
$24,191.80.
B. The parties desire to amend the Agreement to expand the Scope of Services to
provide additional project coordination services.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree that the Agreement entered into on 8th
day of August 2008, shall be amended by expanding the Scope of Services as set forth in the
attached Exhibit "A", which is incorporated herein by reference not -to -exceed $26,552.
The parties further agree that with the foregoing exception, each and every term and
provision of the Agreement dated August 1, 2008, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date
and year first above written.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
WADE & ASSOCIATES
(Corporation - signatures of two corporate officers)
(Partnership - one signature)
(Sole proprietorship - one sigature)
By: By:
Ron Morrison, Mayor
(Print)`
CAN �sEi2—
APPROVED AS TO FORM: (Title)
By:
George H. Eiser, III (Name)
City Attorney
(Print)
(Title)
Exhibit A
WADE & ASSOCIATES
PROJECT MANAGEMENT 656 Fifth Avenue, Suite W
San Diego. California 92101
July 1, 2009
Din Daneshfar, Principal Civil Engineer
City of National City
1243 National City Blvd.
National City, CA 91950
RE: Project Management Services for the City of National City,
Kimball Park Soccer Field
Dear Din,
TEL (619) 244-3418
FAX (619) 794-0180
Byronwadel@mac.com
I am submitting this proposal per your request for a cost estimate to provide additional project
management services for the abovementioned project. The additional services are required
because the alternative soccer field locations and designs are required and to provide certified
payroll review and management. The project is ongoing and should be complete by January 15,
2010.
SCOPE
As the project manager for this project I will work with the City of National City, their project
inspector and the contractor to coordinate all aspects of the construction activities and public
outreach, which includes:
• Attend all meeting.
• Work with and coordinate designers and manufacturer/provider.
• Process RFI's and submittals.
• Review, negotiate, recommend and draft change orders for City approval as necessary.
• Review and recommend invoices for payment.
• Visit the construction as needed to assist in problem resolution.
• Maintain a master construction file.
• Take efforts as necessary and directed to communicate the construction activities to the
general public.
• Review certified payroll and maintain records.
• Finalize the project per City policy and standards.
See attached worksheet for cost breakdown.
Thank you for this opportunity to serve the City of National City on this project.
Sincerely,
6), c_._,c/a
Byron S. Wade
Owner/Principal Project Manager
WADE & ASSOCIATES
Fee Proposal/Cost Estimate
for
City of National City
Kimball Park Soccer Field
Estimated Hours:
#
Task
Principal
Project
Manager
Project
Manager
CAD Oper/
Admin.
Assistant
Survey
. Crew
TOTALS
1
Project Management
120
40
64
26,552
Rates
150
105
68
TOTALS
18,000
4,200
4,352
-
26,552
Estimated Reimbursable Costs:
#
Item
Type of
Units
Cost per Units
Estimated
number of
Units
TOTALS
1
B&W Copies/Prints 8 1/2" x 11"
Each
$ 0.20
-
2
Color Copies/Prints 8 1/2" x 11"
Each
$ 1.00
-
3
Full Size (D Sheets) Paper
Each
$ 15.00
-
4
Full Size (D Sheets) Mylars
Each
$ 30.00
-
5
CD Roms
Each
$ 5.00
-
6
Binder, 2"
Each
$ 22.00
-
7
Binder, 3"
Each
$ 26.00
-
8
Printing Flyers & Doorhangers (estimated)
LS
$ 1,200.00
-
Total Expenses
Total Consulting Fee (above)
Total Cost Estimate
-
26,552.00
$ 26,552.00
I10% Overhead fee will be charged to subcontracted expenses.
Byron S. Wade
Owner/Principal Project Manager
June 21, 2009
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
`...IEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO.
10
ITEM TITLE A Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City ratifying Change Order No. 24 to
the contract with Koch -Armstrong General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $27,835.00 to add missing
sidewalk and a retaining wall on the north side of Sweetwater Road, east of Prospect Street within and as
requested by the County of San Diego for the National City Street Resurfacing Project, FY 08-09 (Phase 2).
(Funded by County Funds through a general fund revenue account)
PREPARED BY Kenneth Fernandez
EXPLANATION
Please see attached page with explanation.
DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4388
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
MIS Approval
Approved By:
Finance Director
The total amount for Change Order No. 24 is $27,835.00. Additional allocation of funds of $27,835.00 is requested for this change order.
Funding is available through General Funds Acct No. 001-409-500-598-6171.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt te •olution.
B • RD / COMMISSION R OMMENDATION
N/A
1
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. Resolution
2. Change Order #24
3. Photocopy of warrant from County of San Diego
A-200 (Rev. 7/03)
SPEC 08-04 CO#24
EXPLANATION
On June 17, 2008, per Resolution No. 2008-107, the City Council awarded a contract to
Koch -Armstrong General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $5,327,000.00 for the National
City Street Resurfacing Project, FY 08-09 (Phase 2), Specification No. 08-04.
This project includes Cold Milling, Leveling Course, Asphalt Rubber Aggregate Membrane
(ARAM), Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM), Type II Slurry Seal, Removal and Replacement of
Asphalt over Class II Base, Removal and Replacement of Asphalt only, Crack Filling,
Removal and Replacement of Sidewalk, Removal and Replacement of Curb Only, Removal
and Replacement of Curb and Gutter, Removal and Replacement of Driveway, and other
related work.
Staff is recommending the ratification of Change Order #24 in order to modernized the area
and provide safer pedestrian access by adding missing sidewalk and a retaining wall on the
north side of Sweetwater Road, east of Prospect Street within and as requested by the
County of San Diego.
This project is funded with County Funds through a general fund revenue account. The
County of San Diego has given us funds totaling $75,000 to be used for right-of-way
acquisition, surveying, legal descriptions, construction management, staff time, construction
materials and labor. (Please see attached photocopy of warrant.) It was determined that
vorking in the county's jurisdiction with their funds, would be beneficial to National City as
well because it would provide continuous pedestrian access where the unincorporated part of
the County meets with National City on Sweetwater Road west of Interstate 805.
In order to expedite and economize the task at hand, a change order with the City's current
resurfacing contractor was the most practical solution to this joint venture with the County.
Change Orders #1 through #23 totaled $304,632.31. With this Change Order #24 of
$27,835.00, the total contract amount is $27,835.00. For clarity, this work will use separate
funds issued by the County of San Diego through account number 001-409-500-598-6171.
Due to the urgency in completing the work, the Change Order has already been signed. It is
recommended that Council ratify this portion of the project.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY RATIFYING
CHANGE ORDER NO. 24 TO THE CONTRACT
WITH KOCH-ARMSTRONG GENERAL ENGINEERING,
INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $27,835.00 TO ADD
MISSING SIDEWALK AND A RETAINING WALL
ON THE NORTH SIDE OF SWEETWATER ROAD,
EAST OF PROSPECT STREET, WITHIN AND AS
REQUESTED BY THE COUNTY OF
SAN DIEGO FOR THE NATIONAL CITY STREET
RESURFACING PROJECT, FY 08-09 (PHASE 2)
WHEREAS, on June 17, 2008, per Resolution No. 2008-107, the City Council
awarded a contract to Koch -Armstrong General Engineering, Inc. in the amount of
$5,327,000.00 for the National City Street Resurfacing Project, FY 08-09 (Phase 2),
Specification No. 08-04; and
WHEREAS, City staff is recommending the ratification of Change Order No. 24 in
the amount of $27,835 in order to modernize the area of the Project and provide safer
pedestrian access by adding missing sidewalk and a retaining wall on the north side of
Sweetwater Road, east of Prospect Street within and as requested by the County of San Diego;
and
WHEREAS, due to time constraints and the urgency in completing the work, the
Change Order has already been signed; therefore, it is requested that the City Council now
ratify Change Order No. 24.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby ratify Change Order No. 24 to the Contract with Koch -Armstrong General
Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $27,835 to add missing sidewalk and a retaining wall on the
north side of Sweetwater Road, east of Prospect Street, within and as requested by the County
of San Diego for Phase 2 of the National City Street Resurfacing Project, FY 08-09.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
•
City of National City
National City Streets Resurfacing Project
Specification #08-04
CHANGE ORDER #24
June 18, 2009
Contractor: KOCH-ARMSTRONG
A Change Order is hereby recommended for the following work in the amount identified below:
Description of Change in the Contract
See Attachment "A".
Cost Reconciliation
This change in the contract was reviewed and negotiated by and between the City Representatives and the
Contractor and represents the entire agreement for the work described herein and includes all costs associated
with the work including but not limited to manpower, equipment, labor, fees, taxes, insurance, bonding,
overhead, profit, etc. and there will be no other compensation. This Change Order hereby incorporates the
original contract and all its referenced documents' terms and conditions.
Justification for Change in Contract
See Attachment "A".
Construction Contract Accounting Summary
Original Contract Amount:
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders:
Contract amount prior to this Change Order:
Amount of this change order:
5,327,000.00 r,
304 632.31
5,631,632.31
27,835.00
New contract amount: $ 5,659,467.31
Original contract time (calendar days):
Previously approved additional working days:
Additional working days for this change order:
Total contract time (working days):
90
45
10
145
(see Weekly Statement of Contract Time for completion date)
Reviewed by:
#/4: '
rincipat Civil Eto
Agreed to and Accepted by:
L(2-109
Koch- strong FF.airt f-1 i ( Date
cc: Contractor, Construction File, Project Manager, City Clerk
Reror minded forap. oval by:
Proje { % anager
Reviewed by:
�� t
CLq
L ate
i E gineer Date
tte5d
14431
•
•
City of National City
National City Streets Resurfacing Project
Specification #t08-04
ATTACHMENT "A" CO #24
DESCRIPTION:
This change in contract is to add missing sidewalk and a retaining wall on the north side of Sweetwater Road,
east of Prospect Street. The change in contract includes but is not limited to installation of 1,102 square feet of
sidealk and eighty-four (84) lineal feet of retaining wall and all work appurtenant thereto. This change in contract
is a lump sum. The breakdown below is for reference only to demonstrate how the lump sum price was arrived
at and includes all material, manpower, equipment, overhead, profit and any and all other costs associated with
this change in contract. There will be no additional costs to the City.
Detailed Schedule of Values
Mobilization
Traffic Control
Grading
Demolition
C-2 Wall
Sidewalk
Adjust signs and utility boxes
JUSTIFICATION:
Unit Quantity Unit Price Total
LS 1.00 3,450.00 3,450.00
LS 1.00 3,900.00 3,900.00
LS 1.00 3,204.00 3,204.00
LS 1.00 2,808.00 2,808.00
LF 84.00 65.45 5,497.80
SF 1,102.00 7.60 8,375.20
EA 3.00 200.00 600.00
TOTAL:
27,835.00
At the County of San Diego's request, the City of National City received funds to design, administer, manage,
and construct miscellaneous public improvements at the north side of Sweetwater Road, east of Prospect
Street. This change in contract adds the construciton of missing sidewalk and a retaining wall at the north side
of Sweetwater Road, east of Prospect in order to achieve compliance with ADA requirements.
This Work is necessary to properly address the completion of public improvements at this location and the
surrounding area and to provide ADA access at this section of Sweetwater road. The contractor, Koch -
Armstrong, is currently performing work of this type and character throughout the City of National City and is
therefore qualifed to competently perform this Work. This change in contract is necessary because the Work, as
described above, was not included in the original contract, but it is of the same type and character.
WALL PER
SDSRD C-2
SECTION A -A
N.T.S.
EXISTING CURB & GUTTER
O
KOCH-ARMSTRONG GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.
P.O. BOX 1190, LAKESIDE, CA 92040-0906
TEL: (619) 561-2005 FAX: (619) 561-0317
LICENSE 194819-A
NATIONAL CI 1 Y ST BEET RE SURF ACING F Y 06-07
1243 NATIONAL CITY 01 VD
NATIONAL CITY . CA 91950
QUOTATION
09-08.4 COP #25
PAGE 1 OF 1 tREVISFD G.16-09)
ATTN BYRON WADE
TEI. (619)3364380
FAX (619) 336 4397
EMAIL byronwadel@mac tom
DATE 6/30/2009
lejopose to furnish all labor,material and equipment necessary to perform the following items of work, subject to terms and conditions stated.
his _quotation expires 30 days from the date above and is good for work completed within one Year of date above unless otherwise noted.
DB LOCATION SWEETWAIF R ROAD AT PROSPECT STREET (NORTIIEAST CORNER).
)ENTIFIED "NATIONAL CITY SIRFET RESURFACING F'ROJECT ", CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL #25 1- SWEETWATER ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
TEM
1
DESCRIPTION _
APPROX.
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT PRICE
TOTAL
MOBILIZE: LAYOUT WALL AND SIDEWALK, U.S.A. MARKOUT.
1
LS
2
2.1
EARTHWORK
1
1055
LS
EXCAVATE, HAUL AND DISPOSI OF E. XISTING SOIL Al NEW SIDE:WAL.K
SF
2 2
2 3
GRADE SI OPL - MAT CI I SIDEWALK & TOP OF EXISI ING SLOPE, HAUL & DISPOSE OF EXCESS SOIL
15
LF
IXCAVATE SOIL Al C-9 WALLS, HAUL & DISPOSE OF
84
LF
2 4
OVFRCUT SOIL AT BACK OF WA!. I S TO AL LOW FOR FORMS & STOCKPILE SOU ONSITE
84
LF
3
3 1
WALLS PER SDRSD C-9 TYPE A AND TYPE C (2' - 3' HIGH)
74
LF
SETUP FORMS
74
LF
32
PUMP CONCRE T E WALL S
74
LF
3.3
4 —.
4 1
STRIP F O12MS, PATCII AS NEEDED AND ESACKFILL WALL
74
LE
5.331WLSIDEWALK WITH 15LF TRANSITION INTO 10' (W) EXISTING RAMP PER SDRSD G-7.
1110
SF
DEiMO EXISTING SIDE -WA( K AT FASI END
10.5
LF
4.2
ADJUSI 10 GRADE ONE, DOUBI E POST SIGN AND 3 EXISTING PRECAST BOXES
4
EA
5
TRAFFIC CONTROL
1
LS
TOTAL
1
LS
27835.00
1
INCLUDES ONE MOVE IN, NATURAL GRAY COLOR/ 2500 PSI, MEDIUM BROOM FINISHED CONCRETE. PREVAILING WAGES, BOND COST,
2
F XCLUDES ADJUSTING UT II !TIES, BASE UNDER CONCRETE, SAWCUTTING, B.M.P.'s, DOORKNOB NOT ICES, SURVEYING/STAKING,
NIGHT/WEEKEND/HOLIDAY WORK DAYS, NEW PRECAST BOXES, SWPP/ WPC PLANS, CAULKING/SEALANT, NEW TRAFFIC PLAN, REINFORCEMENT,
LANDSCAPING/ IRRIGATION, STRIPING. BOLTS/ SLEEVES/ TEMPLATES/ EMBEDED IN CONCRETE,
ANY WORK/LABOR/ MATERIALS OR II LM NOT SPECIFICALLY STATED IN QUOTE
3
OWNER TO PROVIDE FREE DUMP SITE AT BAY MARINA AND FREEWAY 5
ONOI I IONS
Dees not include peen is. bonds. any loon of engmeenrg(st.rking testing. inspection. etc ). base under concrete. redwood headers. slipping. traffic control, or utility adjustment unless otherwise specified
Monthly Progress Payments and f ult Payment port) completion Accounts are delinquent after 30 days. and they are sublecl to the maximum finance charge allowable by taw
Work to be done in accordance with plans, specUn,alrons, and quantities identified above. Koch. Annsttong General Engineering. Inc shall be notified in wndrng prior to any proposed changes
Subyrade to be taken from .1- IC' to balance and at cn below oplinum rnorsture belore Koch.Annstrong General Engineerng. Inc begins work unless otherwise specified
Any unusual conditions of subsoil encountered, such as buried slabs, underground piping, trash deposits. etc. shall he deemed cause for additional charges
Required California Preliminary Lien information (California Civil Code Section 3097/3098) shall be provided to KochArmstiong General Engineenng, Inc belore work begins
Subject to Ctedt Approval and verification of Caklonlia Plelinnary Lien information
Class 2 material 4 incktded is 314- recycled Class 2 pen Calttans Standard Specification Section 26 unless otherwcse noted
acceptance:
Please sign and return one copy•lhrs quotation constitutes the
sole and only agreement Any pilot agreements. negoliabons.
rlr. not set torah herein are of no ',Ace or effect
arm: NATIONAL. CITY STREET RESURFACING FY 06-07
1y:
By:
KOCH-ARMSTRONG GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.
6/30/09
Date FRANK HERRFRA
KOCH-ARMSTRONG GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.
P.O. BOX 1190, LAKESIDE, CA 92040-0906
TEL: (619) 561-2005 FAX: (619) 561-0317
LICENSE 194819-A
QUOTATION
09-079.2 (REVISED 6-16-09)
TO
NATIONAL CITY STPEF T RESURFACING f Y 06-07
1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD
NA I TONAL CITY CA 91950
DATE 6/300009
PAGE 1 OF 1
AT TN BYRON WADE.
1LI. IG19)336-4380
CELL
FAX (619) 336 4 97
EMAIL byronwadel(rilrnac tom
We propose to furnish all Tabor, material,_and equipment necessary to perform the following.items of work, subjectto terms and conditions stated.
This quotation expires 30 days from the date above and is good for work completed within one year of date above unless otherwise noted.
JOB LOCATION 4th AND - SOUTHEAST CORNER PCR TO 2451 F EAST
IDENTIFIED NATIONAL CITY STREET RESURFACING CITANGL ORDER PROPOSAL #49- 4thAND'M' G•2
11 FM
MOBILIZATION & BOND COST
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL
DESCRIPTION
3 REMOVE & REPLACE G7 SIDEWALK
13 REMOVE AND REPLACE G-2 CURB AND GUTTER
14 REMOVE AND REPLACE DRIVEWAY G-14
27 ASPHALT
27 1 I ILI Al TOE AND I EAT! ER AC 4 96' FROM (NI G-2 TOE (6' f ROM f t OWL INC- ). INCLUDES AREA OVER
AC BASED SLO1 PATCH
2 / 2 SAND AND SEAL
TERMS:
1 INCLUDES ONE MOVE IN,
2 EXCLUDES B M P 's. PRECAST BOXES, SWPPP/TRAFFIC CONTROL PI ANS, S1RIPING, ANY ITEM NOT SPECIFICAI LY STATED IN OVOTF
3 OTHERS 'TO PROVIDE SURVEY STAKING, TIED- OFF SURVEY MARKERS,
TOTAL
APPROX. UNIT UNIT PRICE IOTAI.
QUANTITY
1 LS 5395.00
1 LS 4945.00
234 SF 7.60 1778.40
199 LF 45.00 8955.00
274 SF 11.55 3164.70
1 LS 5856.00
1165 SI
1165
SF
30094.10
CONDITIONS
1 Does not include permits. bonds. any form oI enyrneenny(stakng. testing uaperUwr. etc ). base under concrete redwood traders. sloping. traffic control. or uhhly adjustment unless otherwise specified
7 Monthly Progress Payments and f rill Payment upon completion Areounts axe delinquent after 30 days. and they are subject to the man orurn finance charge allowable by law
3 Work to be done in accordance with plans spt.Y.'hcalons, and quantities identified above Kodr.Armstrong General Engineering Inc shall be notified nr writing prat to any proposed :)ranges
4 Subgrade 10 be taken horn •1. 10' to balance arid al or below optimum rtrorstule before Koch Armstrong General Engineering Inc begins work unless otherwise specified
5 Any unusual conditions of subsoil encountered such as buried slabs. underground arprrg trash deposits etc. shall De deemed cause for additional charges
6 Required California Preliminary Len ulonnation (Cahlorma Owl Code Sechon 3097/30981 shah to provided to Koch Arroshorg General E rgrrieenrg, Inc before work begnr.
7 Subject to Credit Approval and verrlrcalrun of California Preliminary t ien information
8 Class 2 mralerlal i1 included is 3'-d recycled Class 7 per Calhans Standard 7pecikcal,on `:ec bon 26 unless ome rw,se noted
:nee:
Please sign and return one copy -this qu0talron constitutes the
sole and only agreement Any prior agreements. reyoliabons.
etc . not set lorth herein are of no force nr effect
KOCH-ARMSTRONG GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.
Firm: NATIONAL CITY STREET RESURFACING FY 06-07
By:
Dale
By:
FRANK HERRERA Date
KOCH-ARMSTRONG GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC.
P.O. BOX 1190, LAKESIDE, CA 92040-0906
TEL: (619) 561-2005 FAX: (619) 561-0317
LICENSE 194819-A
QUOTATION
09-089.1 COP #50
PAGE 1 11tEV li• 17.00)
10 NAT IONAL CITY STREET RESLJRI ACING LY 06.07
1243 NAT IONAI CITY 81 VD.
NATIONAL CITY . CA 91950
DATE_ 6/3012009
Al TN BYRON WADE
TEL (619) 336 4380
CELL
FAX (619) 588-5475
EMAIL byronwadel@rnac con
We propose to furnish all labor, material, and equipment necessary to perform the following items of work, subject to terms and conditions stated.
This quotation expires 30 days from the date above and is good for work completed within one year of date above unless otherwise noted.
JOB LOCATION 10th AND *V' STRET. NATIONAL CITY
IDENTIFIED "NATIONAL CI IY STREET RESURFACING PROJECT'. CHANGE ORDER PROPOSAL #50 CROSS (;LITTERS
ITEM DESCRIPTION
1 MOBIL IZATION LAYOUT CROSS GUTTE.RS & RAMPS RENTAL SAW MOVE: IN CHARGE 8 BOND
2 TRAFFIC CONTROL
11 REMOVE & REPLACE G7 SIDEWALK
13 REMOVE & REPLACE G-2 CURB & GUI TER
16 REMOVE & REPLACE CROSS GUTTER G12
APPROX.
OUAN1I T Y
18 PEDESTRIAN RAMPS G2t. G28, G29, G30. G31
TOTAL
168
30
434
UNIT
LS
S
SF
UNIT PRICE TOTAL
706 00
670 00
760 127680
t.F 4500 135000
Sr 17 90 7768 60
LA 2065 00 7065 CK)
13836.40
INCLUDES ONE MOVE IN BOND COST FOR I IEMS 1 8 2
EXCLUDES BASE UNDER CONCRETE, STRIPING, ADJUSTING UTILITIES.
ANY WORK/I ABOR/ MATERIALS OR 11 EM NOT SPECIFICALLY S I Al ED IN QUOTE
CONDITIONS
1 Does not ndJude permits. bonds, any form of engrneenng(stakrng. testing. mspertron, etc jr. base under concrete. redwood headers, striping, traffic control, or utdrty adjustment unless otherwise specified
2 Monthly Progress Payments and Full Payment upon completion Accounts are dehnguent after 30 days. and they are subject tit the maxrmurn finance charge allowable by law
3 Work to be done in accordance with plans, speuficihoos, and quantities identified above Koch -Armstrong General Engneening, Inc shatr be notified in widow; prior to any proposed changes
4 Subyrade to be taken from •\. 10' to balance and at or below optimum moisture before Koch•Armstrong General Engineering. Inc. begins wak unless otherwise specified
5 Any unusual conditions of subsod encountered. such as bused slabs underground piping, bash deposits. etc shalt be deemed cause for addrbonal charges
6 Required Cahlornua Prehmnary Two information (California Civil Code ]Section 3097'3U91) shall be provided to Koch Armstrong General EngineeringInc before work begins
J Subject to Credit Aflroval and venficahon of California Pnelinnary Lien ntormabon
8 Class 2 material it included is 3'+1- recycled Class 7 ;xrr (:ahnans Standard Specification Sec ton 26 unless otherwise noted
Acceptance:
Please sign and return une copy this quotation constitutes the
sole and urdy agreement Any prior agreements. negotiations.
etc . not set forth herein are of rx) torce nx effect
KOCH-ARMSTRONG GENERAL ENGINEERING, INC. Ninigi
Firnr: NATIONAL CITY STREET RESURFACING FY 06-07
By By:
Date FRANK HERRERA Date
expstat.rpt
06/29/2009 5:51 PM
Periods: 0 through 14
Expenditure Status Report Page: 1
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
7/1/2008 through 6/30/2009
001 GENERAL FUND
409 NON -DEPARTMENTAL
Account Number
Adjusted Year-to-date Year-to-date Prct
Appropriation Expenditures Expenditures Encumbrances Balance Used
500 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
500-500 Capital Outlay
500-598-6171 COUNTY SIDEWALK PROJECT-SWEETWATER ROAD 75,000.00
Total GENERAL FUND 75.000 00
Grand Total
2 323 92
2.323 92
75,000.00 2.323 92
2.323 92
2.323 92
0.00
0.00
2.323.92 0.00
72.676 08
72.676.08
72.676.08
310
3 10
3.10
Page: 1
County of San Diego Wells Fargo Bank Ohio, N.AV. 56-3821412
.5 • ' 1600 Pacific Highway 115 Wert. OH a�ss91
San Diego. CA 92101-2478
TheTreasurer
Will Pay
To
r
•
Seventy -Five Thousand Dollars And 00 Cents
NATIONAL CITY, CITY OF
1243 NATIONAL- CITY BLVD
NATIONAL CITY CA 91950-4397
j
Gh7aan=• aiii;lISf•t•t t•IfllReiagmeirmet--ino nS•maiiii--1a•Nta iamiti1isulttl tctiorile1•1•ieira IIi3'ltl:��:
Warrant No.
4935606
Date of Issue: 09/19/2008
r$ *****75,000.00*)
VOID IF NOT PRLSLNILD 10 COUNTY TREASURER WITHIN
SIX MONTlIS FROM UAiL 01 ISSUE . GOVT CODE SECT. 29802
c-Ve,
AUDITOR AND CONTROLLER
•-;-THE-BACKOF:THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS -AN ARTIFICIALWATERMARKHOLD.AT-AN ANGL'E':TOcVIEW. -:
II'nt.9 3 560611' 1:01. 1 20 3f3 Ai: 96000 50GG 21I'
PLEASE ADDRESS CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING THIS PAYMENT
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
AUDITOR AND CONTROLLER
ROOM 163 COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
SAN DIE=GO, CA 92101-2478
(619) 531-5321
AUTFiORITYIPO
525279
INVOICE
6/17/2008(
DESCRIPTION
COMMUNITY PROJECTS FY07-08
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
Finance Department
619 336-4330
National City 3/ / 14862
09/24/2008 15:16:41.000 Reg WXP-CASHO2
Validation Receipt
CHARGES-
001-00000-3470
GF3470 sidewalk project o$
75000.00
Sub -total $s sss*75000.00
PAYMENT
Check- 5606 $ /5000.00
county of san diego
Change $t+.rt..:.r0.00
THANK YOU!
Business Hours:
7:00 -. 6:00 Monday Through Thursday
Closed on Fridays
WARRANT NO. 4935606
DISCOUNT AMOUNT
000
0i0
NET AMOUNT
75,000.00
75,000.00
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
. 11EETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO. 11
(ITEM TITLE A Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City ratifying Change Order No. 1 to
the contract with MJC Construction Company in the amount of $15,600.00 to provide ADA restroom
improvements and upgrades to the Kimball Park men's and women's Center Restrooms for the National
City Parks Rehabilitation Furnishings Project. (Funded through General Funds)
PREPARED BY Kenneth Fernandez
EXPLANATION
Please see attached page with explanation.
DEPARTMENT Engineering EXT. 4388
i
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
MIS Approval
Approved By:
Finance Director
The total amount for Change Order No. 1 is $15,600.00. Additional allocation of funds of $15,600.00 is requested for this change order.
Funding is available through General Funds Acct No. 001-409-500-598-4127.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
• ;
/ '/' esolution.
dopy
B • A • / COMMISSION RECO ENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. Resolution
2. Change Order #1
A-200 (Rev. 7/03)
SPEC 07-06-B
EXPLANATION
On April 7, 2009, per Resolution No. 2009-82, the City Council awarded a contract to MJC
Construction Company in the amount of $84,722.00 for the National City Parks Rehabilitation
Furnishings Project (Phase 2), Specification No. 07-06-B.
In order to meet the deadline of July 1, 2009, Kimball Park's center men's and women's
restrooms were improved and updated to current ADA standards as a change order to the
furnishings project. This was done as a means to expedite and complete construction prior to
the Annual Fourth of July Carnival. One set of men's and women's restrooms at El Toyon
and Las Palmas Parks is still outstanding and will be handled as a separate project.
With this Change Order #1 of $15,600.00, the total contract amount is $100,322.00.
Due to the urgency in completing the work, the Change Order has already been signed. It is
recommended that Council ratify this portion of the project.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY RATIFYING
CHANGE ORDER NO. 1 TO THE CONTRACT
WITH MJC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY IN THE
AMOUNT OF $15,600 TO PROVIDE ADA
RESTROOM IMPROVEMENTS AND UPGRADES
TO THE KIMBALL PARK MEN'S AND WOMEN'S
CENTER RESTROOMS FOR THE NATIONAL CITY
PARKS REHABILITATION FURNISHINGS PROJECT
WHEREAS, on April 7, 2009, per Resolution No. 2009-82, the City Council
awarded a contract to MJC Construction Company in the amount of $84,722.00 for the National
City Parks Rehabilitation Furnishings Project (Phase 2), Specification No. 07-06-B; and
WHEREAS, in order to meet the deadline of July 1, 2009 and complete
construction prior to the Annual Fourth of July event, Kimball Park's center men's and women's
restrooms were improved and updated to current ADA standards as Change Order No. 1 to the
Furnishings Project, in the amount of $15,600. One set of men's and women's restrooms at El
Toyon and Las Palmas Parks is still outstanding and will be handled as a separate project; and
WHEREAS, due to the time constraints and urgency in completing the work,
Change Order No. 1 has already been signed, and City staff now recommends that the City
Council ratify said Change Order.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby ratifies Change Order No. 1 to the contract with MJC Construction
Company in the amount of $15,600.00 to provide ADA restroom improvements and upgrades to
the Kimball Park men's and women's Center Restrooms for the National City Parks
Rehabilitation Furnishings Project.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21 st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
National City Parks Rehabilitation Furnishings Project
Specification No. 07-06-B
CHANGE ORDER #1
June 11, 2009
Contractor: MJC CONSTRUCTION
A Change Order is hereby recommended for the following work in the amount identified below:
Description of Change in the Contract
See Attachment "A".
Cost Reconciliation
This change in the contract was reviewed and negotiated by and between the City Representatives and the
Contractor and represents the entire agreement for the work described herein and includes all costs associated
with the work including but not limited to manpower, equipment, labor, fees, taxes, insurance, bonding,
overhead, profit, etc. and there will be no other compensation. This Change Order hereby incorporates the
original contract and all its referenced documents' terms, conditions, and plans for the work as provided by the
City.
Justification for Change in Contract
See Attachment "A".
Construction Contract Accounting Summary
Original Contract Amount 84,722 00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders:
Contract amount prior to this Change Order: 84,722.00
Amount of this change order: 15,600.00
New contract amount: $ 100,322 00
Original contract time (calendar days)
Previously approved additional working days:
Additional working days for this change order.
Total contract time (working days):
(see Weekly Statement of Contract Time for completion date)
Reviewed by:
ri ipat Civil Engin r Da
Agreed to and Accepted by.
INSTRUCTION
e
of
Date
cc Contractor. Construction File, Project Manager, City Clerk
25
0
29 Contractor will finish work no later than June 30, 2009
54
Recommended for approval by:
Approved b
City
Dlae�4
�
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
National City Parks Rehabilitation Furnishings Project
Specification No. 07-06-B
ATTACHMENT "A" CO #1
DESCRIPTION: This change in contract is to make improvements to and around the Men's and Wornen's
restrooms in Kimball park to ensure compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The breakdown
below is for reference only and the total cost includes all material, manpower, equipment, overhead, profit and
any and all other costs associated with this change in contract. There are no additional costs to the City.
No. L ocation Improvement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Kimball Park. Western Parking Lot Re -paint two (2) parking stalls. One van stall. One regular ADA stall.•
Create path of travel to the restrooms
Install ADA compliant signage along path of travel
Replace or re -set concrete panels
Kimball Park. Central Building Remove and replace damaged/raised concrete strips
Kimball Park. Wornen's Restroorn Remove entry door
Replace raised concrete entrance
Add welded tabs to lock gate open
Relocate hand dryer
Raise water closet plumbing
Install plumbing wrap at lavatories
Rernove temporary partition
Remove water closet and patch hole in wall
Install universal wall signage with Braille
Remove, inspect, clean and polish all plumbing fixtures
Remove paint over -spray, sand blast and re -seal floor
Repaint repaired areas as necessary
Kimball Park Men's Restroorn Replace raised concrete entrance
Install plurnbing wrap at lavatories
Raise water closet plumbing
Install grab bars
Relocate hand dryer
Add welded tabs to lock gate open
Install universal wall signage with Braille
Clean and polish all plurnbing fixtures
Repaint repaired areas as necessary
Remove paint over -spray, sand blast and re -seal floor
TOTAL COST FOR IMPROVEMENTS 1-27:
$ 15,600.00
JUSTIFICATION: It was brought to the City's attention that certain bathroom facilities within National City parks
must undergo certain improvements in order to achieve compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA). The City is in the process of addressing a comprehensive list of ADA concerns for the parks located
within the City. This change in contract is a preliminary step to address the need for the restroorn facility in
Kimball Park to come into compliance with ADA requirements prior to the Fourth of July celebration slated to
take place in ttre park.
This change in contract makes improvements to those aspects of the Kimball Park restroom facility that do not
currently comply with ADA requirements. This change in contract includes improvements to the parking tot, the
path to the restroom, and to the restroom itself. These improvernents are required to achieve compliance with
ADA requirements. This change in contract is also necessary because the ADA improvements outlined above
are not included in the original contract, but they are within the type and character of work found in the original
contract.
'ONSTRUCI'ION
.,..,/15 Sylvia St.
Bonita, CA 91902
Name / Address
City Of National City
It
0
Estimate
Date
Estimate #
G/ 10/2009
5
Project
Description
Qty
Cost
Total
Kimball Park k Modifications
National City Packs Rehabilitation
Specification No. 07-06-('
See attached scope
I
15,600.00
15,600.00
Total s 15,600.00
Kimball Park Western Parking Lot:
❑ Re -paint the two accessible parking stalls adjacent to the trash
enclosure to establish a van stall on the north side and a regular ADA
stall on the south with stripping defining the path of travel going
between the trash enclosures in the parking lot to the walkways. Refer
to sheet K-A1.2
❑ Create a path of travel to the restroorn identified by installing the
necessary signage, and insure that the walkways do not contain any
safety concems per ADA requirements.
u Install ADA compliant signage parking and for the path of travel
between the restroom and the Eastern and Western parking lots. Refer
to sheet K-Al2, 1.3, 1.7 match City standard for ADA signage. ( all
locations noted herein)
• Replace or re -set all concrete panels where heights exceed Y4" min.
standards, grind concrete joints only if directed to do so.
Kimball Park Central Building:
o Remove and replace damaged/ raised concrete strips between columns
at the trellis area. Refer to K-A1.9
Women's Restroom:
u Remove entry door.
u Replace the raised entrance concrete.
u Add welded tabs to lock gate open.
u Relocate the Hand dryer. Unit actuator must not exceed 40" AFF. Meet
ADA min. standard.
o Raise water closet plumbing to achieve a min.17"AFF.
u Install plumbing wrap at lavatories.
u Remove temporary partition.
u Remove left side (Eastern) water closet and patch hole in wall, return to
owner.
u Install universal wall signage with Braille.
o Remove, inspect, dean and polish all plumbing fixtures.
o Remove paint over -spray, Sand blast and re -seat floor.
o Repaint repaired areas as necessary.
Men's Restroom:
u Replace the raised entrance concrete.
u Install plumbing wrap at lavatories
u Raise water closet plumbing to achieve a min 17"AFF relocate to proper
location.
u Install grab bars @ 33-36" AFF verify quantity with owner.
• Relocate the Hand dryer. Actuator must not exceed 40" AFF meet ADA
min. standard.
a Add welded tabs to lock gate open
• Install universal wall signage with Braille.
• Clean and polish all plumbing fixtures.
o Repaint repaired areas as necessary.
Remove paint over -spray, Sand blast and re -seal floor.
The Scope of Work within this Change Order is reflected
in the.revised plans 9998,10006-7, and 10012-14-D.
See Delta notes dated May 18th, 2009.
City of National City, California
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
`ifteMEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO.
12
ITEM TITLE Resolution Accepting the Revised Targeted Employment Area for the San Diego Regional
Enterprise Zone
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
Alfredo Ybarra (Ext. 4279)
Housing and Grants
EXPLANATION
Adoption of the resolution would revise the Target Employment Area (TEA) for the San Diego Regional
Enterprise Zone (SDREZ).
The TEA is one of several qualifying factors for obtaining state hiring tax credits. The TEA allows
residents of certain designated low-income areas to qualify Enterprise Zone (EZ) employers for
substantial hiring credits through a "vouchering" system. A TEA is an area with an EZ designation and
composed solely of those census tracts that have at least 51 percent of its residents of low or moderate
income levels. Hiring tax credits are available too EZ businesses employing eligible residents from these
geographic areas.
On July 1, 2008, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the boundaries for the TEA. Since that
time, the economy has taken a downturn causing other census tracts to qualify as a TEA. The adoption of
the resolution would amend the TEA boundaries originally approved by your council on July 1, 2008 and
include new qualifying census tracts.
Environmental Review N/ N/A
-4 _;
Approved By.
inance Director
Financial Statement
SDREZ Partnership's funding contributions for future years to appropriately maintain the SDREZ Program
throughout its designation period shall be addressed when staff returns to Council requesting authorization
to execute the MOU between the SDREZ Partnership.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution Accepting the Revised Targeted Employment Area for the San Diego Regional
Enterprise Zone
BOARD 1 COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below )
71. Background Report
2. Target Employment Area Map
Resolution No.
A-200 (9/99)
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ACCEPTING THE
REVISED TARGET EMPLOYMENT AREA FOR
THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL ENTERPRISE ZONE
WHEREAS, in 2006, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing
submission of an application to the California Housing and Community Development
Department (HCD) for a San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone (SDREZ) designation for the
cities of San Diego, Chula Vista, and National City (SDREZ Partners); and
WHEREAS, in November 2006, the City of San Diego, as the lead agency for the
SDREZ, was notified that it was awarded a conditional EZ designation, with final designation
contingent upon satisfactory completion of the conditions imposed for the designation; and
WHEREAS, the SDREZ Partners are engaged in the task of completing the
remaining conditions imposed by the HUD for final designation of the "conditionally approved"
SDREZ, including the submittal of appropriate documentation to HCD establishing a Targeted
Employment Area (TEA) for the SDREZ. A "Targeted Employment Area" is an area with an EZ
designation and composed solely of those census tracts that have at least 51 percent of its
residents of low or moderate income levels' and
WHEREAS, on July 1, 2008, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the
boundaries for the TEA. Since that time, the economy has taken a downturn causing other
census tracts to qualify as a TEA. This Resolution amends the TEA boundaries originally
approved by the Council on July 1, 2008 to include newly qualified census tracts.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby accepts the revised Target Employment Area boundaries as depicted on
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21 st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Della, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, HI
City Attorney
BACKGROUND
In 2006, the City Council approved a resolution authorizing submission of an application
to the California Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) for a San
Diego Regional Enterprise Zone (SDREZ) designation, the SDREZ, for the cities of San
Diego, Chula Vista, and National City (SDREZ, Partners). The process for Enterprise
Zone (EZ) designation is competitive and based on economic need (distressed
communities, lack of private investment, job creation needs, high unemployment, and/or
poverty) and must include a realistic and ambitious EZ program marketing and job
development strategies and a solid implementation plan.
In November 2006, the City of San Diego, as the lead agency for the SDREZ, was
notified that it was awarded a conditional EZ designation. Final designation is contingent
upon satisfactory completion of the conditions imposed for the designation. Upon
receiving notification of the conditional designation, the SDREZ Partnership began
implementing administrative changes to accommodate the new EZ designation including
bringing the San Diego Unified Port District as a collaborative partner to the Partnership.
The SDREZ Partners are engaged in the task of completing the remaining conditions for
final designation of the "conditionally approved" SDREZ, the submittal of appropriate
documentation to HCD establishing a Targeted Employment Area (TEA) for the SDREZ
is another condition of IHCD. A "'Targeted Employment Area" is an area with and EZ
designation and composed solely of those census tracts that have at least 51 percent of its
residents of low or moderate income levels. Hiring tax credits are available to EZ
businesses employing eligible residents from these geographic areas.
On July 1, 2008, the City Council adopted a resolution approving the boundaries for the
TEA. Since that time, the economy has taken a downturn causing other census tracts to
qualify as a TEA. This adoption of the resolution would amend the TEA boundaries
originally approved by your council on July 1, 2008 and include newly qualified census
tracts.
Recommended Action: This requested Council action would accept the revised TEA
boundaries.
The next step in the process is to return to City Council with an ordinance requesting
authorization to execute a final MOU between HCD and the "SDREZ" partners"
outlining the goals, commitments and requirements for the SDREZ through its fifteen
(15) year designation period and requesting authorization to execute a separate MOU
between the SDREZ Partnership formalizing the cooperative framework for managing an
fiscally supporting the SDREZ throughout the designation period.
San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone
Targeted --: ;
�mA. ��f^ tir g Employment Area
NO
Legend
QSDREZ Boundaries
(Proposed TEA Bouncanes
1..72 ] Municipal Bouncanes
one oez
CMII/OMMIM -
NATIONAL Cl
le
roDMm
CITY
CHUTA VISTA
Exhibit A
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
" i IEETING DATE July 21, 2009 AGENDA ITEM NO. 13
ITEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF NATIONAL CITY APPROVING THE SAN
DIEGO REGIONAL ENTERPRISE ZONE BOUNDARY MODIFICATIONS
(PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
Alfredo Ybarra (Ext. 4279) Community Development, Housing and Grin•
EXPLANATION
On April 21, 2009, the City Council approved a continuation of the San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone Boundary
Modification in the City of San Diego. The continuation was approved to provide the City of San Diego an
opportunity to prepare and submit a boundary modification explanation and justification report.
This report submitted by the City of San Diego on May 29, 2009, provides an explanation and justification to the City
of San Diego's boundary modification request. The report outlines 1) an explanation of a boundary modification and
zone expansion, 2) boundary modification and zone expansion eligibility criteria 3) economic distress factors in the
City of San Diego Metro area 4) City of San Diego redevelopment projects 5) regional economic factors 6) acreage,
and 7) San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone local incentives narrative.
The proposed boundary modification will include downtown San Diego (1,303.9 acres); Mid City Area (273.34 acres)
and City Heights (148.45 acres). The new boundary modification does not affect National City's SDREZ acreage.
In regards to the Paradise Village area, Sections 7074 (a) and (b) of the Government Code govern expansion within
a single jurisdiction. These sections state that land within proposed expansion must be zoned industrial or
commercial. The Paradise Village area is currently zoned "Private Institutional" and would require the property
owner to successfully apply and rezone the parcels to commercial or industrial use.
Environmental Review These areas were not part of the environmental impact report approved by
the Council on April 21, 2009. The City of San Diego's General Plan EIR contained an economic
development element which is being accepted as fulfilling the CEQA requirem
Financial Statement Approved By:
There is no fiscal impact associated with this request.
Account No.
nance Director
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt resolution approving the boundary modification to the San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below )
1. San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone, Boundary Modification and Justification Report
2. Proposed Boundary Modification Map
Resolution No.
A-200 (9/99)
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
APPROVING THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL
ENTERPRISE ZONE BOUNDARY MODIFICATION
WHEREAS, on April 21, 2009, the City Council first considered the City of San
Diego's San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone (SDREZ) boundary modification, adding to the
Enterprise Zone land located in Downtown San Diego (1,303.9 acres) the Mid -City area (273.34
acres), and City Heights (148.45 acres); and
WHEREAS, at that time the City Council requested additional information from
the City of San Diego to be provided on the form of a boundary modification explanation and
justification report; and
WHEREAS, the City of San Diego submitted a report on May 29, 2009, providing
an explanation and justification to the City of San Diego's boundary modification request, setting
forth 1) an explanation of the boundary modification and zone expansion, 2) the boundary
modification and zone expansion eligibility criteria 3) the economic distress factors in the City of
San Diego Metro area 4) the City of San Diego redevelopment projects 5) the regional
economic factors 6) the acreage involved, and 7) the San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone
local incentives narrative; and
WHEREAS, City of National City staff has recommended that San Diego's
requested boundary modification be approved, as depicted in the attached Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby approves the San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone boundary modification,
as requested by the City of San Diego, adding to the Enterprise Zone land located in Downtown
San Diego (1,303.9 acres), the Mid -City Area (273.34 acres), and City Heights (148.45 acres).
A map showing the boundaries of the Enterprise Zone as modified is attached hereto as Exhibit
"A" and incorporated herein by reference.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21 st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
BACKGROUND
In 1992 the City of San Diego received approval for the South Bay Enterprise Zone. In 2000 and
again in 2004, the South Bay Enterprise Zone was expanded to include properties along the
Bayfront redevelopment areas of the cities of Chula Vista and National City. The South Bay
Enterprise Zone expired on January 27, 2007. In 2006, Council approved a resolution supporting
and authorizing the submittal of a joint application to the State of California Housing and
Community Development Department for a new regional Enterprise Zone designation, with the
cities of San Diego and Chula Vista. This partnership was "Conditionally Approved" in October
of 2006.
As part of the approval for the final new regional Enterprise Zone designation, the City of San
Diego is proposing to submit a boundary modification to State HCD for approval. The area of the
boundary modification is within the City of San Diego's city limits. A map showing the modified
boundaries (Attachment 2) is attached.
According to the State of California 'lousing and Community Development Department,
boundary modifications are not subject to the same requirements as a request for post -final
designation expansion. Instead, State HCD generally approves boundary modifications of areas
that were "(1) previously in the zone but were omitted through an oversight, or (2) added because
of changes requested by the Department." Importantly, boundary modifications are limited to
those areas commercial or industrial, and cannot exceed 5% of the total acreage.
The City of San Diego has indicated that their downtown area was not included because of a
"misinterpretation of the qualifying criteria," however, it was previously included in the Metro
Enterprise Zone. The State HCD has indicated that during its conversations with the City of San
Diego regarding this matter, it has preliminarily concurred with the City of San Diego's request
for the boundary modification. Attached as Attachment 1 is the City of San Diego's Boundary
Modification Explanation and Justification that will be forwarded to the State HCD.
The areas proposed for boundary modification were not part of the environmental impact report,
or part of the original application. City of San Diego staff has represented that their General Plan
Update EIR addressed any environmental issues as part of the economic development element.
This is a similar approach as taken by the City of Chula Vista, which was not part of the SDREZ
EIR because its recent General Plan Update EIR had an economic element which satisfied HCD's
CEQA requirement. The new boundary modification does not affect National City's SDREZ
acreage.
After an enterprise zone receives final designation, the zone may request an expansion.
Government Code section 7074(a) provides that a city may propose that the "enterprise zone be
expanded by 15 percent to include definitive boundaries that are contiguous to the enterprise
zone." HCD may approve an expansion based on the following criteria: 1) each of the adjacent
jurisdictions approves the expansion by resolution or ordinance; 2) land included within the
proposed expansion is zoned for industrial or commercial use; and, 3) basic infrastructure is
available to the expansion area.
ATTACHMENT 1
San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone
Boundary Modification Explanation and Justification
LEGISLATIVE PURPOSE FOR ENTERPRISE ZONES
The legislative intent of the Enterprise Zone (EZ) program is to "stimulate business and
industrial growth in the depressed areas of the State". The other purposes are to
establish a program "to help attract business and industry to the state, to help retain and
expand existing state business and industry, and to create increased job opportunities
for all Californians". Essentially, EZ's are competitively designated based upon distress
criteria (primarily poverty and unemployment levels) and the local government's
capacity to carry out economic development programs. Local jurisdictions must provide
additional local incentives throughout the 15-year designation, i.e. permit expediting, fee
waivers and/or reductions.
Businesses located within the San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone (SDREZ) may
receive individual or corporate state tax incentives/credits to reduce a company's state
tax liability dollar per dollar. Any unused tax credits may be carried forward to reduce
future tax year's liabilities. Two bills that went into effect on January 1, 2009, AB 1452
and SBX1 28, will have an impact on businesses state-wide especially EZ businesses.
The bills combined temporarily suspend the Net Operating Loss provision, includes a
50% credit usage limitation and allows for the transfer of unused tax credits but limited
to tax generated in the same zone.
In order to meet the economic challenges and changes of local EZ jurisdictions from the
time an application is submitted and final designation is awarded as well as through the
fifteen year designation of the zone, there are two mechanisms available to make
changes to zone boundaries. The first method is via a one-time boundary modification
and the second is through an expansion.
BOUNDARY MODIFICATION vs ZONE EXPANSION
Boundary Modification
Prior to obtaining final designation of a conditional EZ designation, the State Housing
and Community Development Department (HCD) will accept one boundary modification
request per zone to include areas meeting certain conditions. This allows zones to
modify conditionally approved application areas and include new areas not in the
original application. Boundary modifications that comply with the following
circumstances may be administratively approved by HCD:
May 29, 2009
1) An area was previously in an expired EZ and the benefits of the program are still
needed in order to complete revitalization efforts; or
2) The census tract /blocks comply with HCD's eligibility criteria for designation; and
3) The area does not to exceed 5% of the EZ application area; and
4) Areas for consideration must be contiguous; and
5) Areas meet the City's stated EZ strategic plan as submitted in the original
application; and
6) The boundary modification is approved by resolution by the jurisdictions'
governing bodies.
Additionally, target areas for includsion are zoned commercial and/or industrial. The
designation date for boundary modification is the same as the conditionally approved
EZ. Therefore, businesses may take advantage of EZ incentives retroactive to the date
of designation. For the SDREZ the designation date is October 15, 2006.
Zone Expansion
Zone expansions are permissible per California Government Code Section 7074, which
is known as the Enterprise Zone Act. Expansions can be requested at any time during
the fifteen year designation after final EZ designation is received. Zone expansions are
done based on the following criteria:
1) Each of the adjacent jurisdictions' governing bodies approves the expansion by
adoption of an ordinance or resolution; and
2) Land included within the proposed expansion is zoned for industrial or
commercial use; and
3) Basic infrastructure, including, but not limited to gas, water, electrical service,
and sewer systems, is available to the area that would be included in the
expansion; and
4) The expansion does not exceed the permitted 15 percent of its size on the date
of original designation; and
5) The proposed expansion is contiguous however a noncontiguous area may be
acceptable if HCD finds that:
a. The noncontiguous area is needed to implement the EZ's economic
development strategy; and
b. The excluded areas between the proposed new boundaries would not,
based on the EZ's economic development strategy, also benefit from the
expansion,
Additionally, expansions are not retroactive to the effective date of the zone but are
effective the date HCD approves the expansion request.
May 29, 2009
San Diego Metropolitan Area
Portions of San Diego's downtown were previously in the Metro Enterprise Zone
(MEZ). It was not included in the 2006 SDREZ application area because of a
misinterpretation of the qualifying criteria (see table below for further explanation).
However, the state may administratively approve a max. 5% boundary modification to a
conditionally approved application area to include an areais previously in an EZ (such
as downtown and areas in City Heights) or eligible areas but not included in the
application area (such as areas in North Park). The SDREZ is still only conditionally
approved pending resolution on the boundary modification by the SDREZ Partnership
and HCD's final approval.
As discussed at monthly SDREZ Partnership meetings, it was always the intent to
include downtown San Diego in the EZ via an expansion in order for the San Diego
region to be competitive with other large metropolitan areas in California (Los Angeles,
Sacramento, San Jose, Long Beach, and San Francisco) and other states. The SDREZ
strategy also identifies downtowns as "the heart of communities and should be
destination areas." Therefore, adding the identified 1,303.9 acres in San Diego's
downtown area to the SDREZ supports the SDREZ strategy to "retain, strengthen and
expand the existing business base in our community." Attachment 1 is an excerpt from
the 2006 Enterprise Zone Application from San Diego Region EZ Local Incentives
Narrative and identifies the overall economic strategy and goals of the SDREZ for San
Diego, Chula Vista and National City.
BOUNDARY MODIFICATION JUSTIFICATION
Eligibility Criteria
All of the downtown San Diego areas cited for inclusion via the boundary modification
mechanism meet the eligibility criteria required (see Attachment 2 and the table below)
for determining the application area boundaries for an Enterprise Zone (see Attachment
3) and are all contiguous to the SDREZ application area.
All of the areas identified for inclusion in the boundary modification meet the following
State Enterprise Zone "Eligibility Qualifying Criteria":
Qualifying Criteria 3 — The percentage of persons below the poverty level in 2000
was 15.2 percent or more
Qualifying Criteria 4 — At least 70 percent of households had incomes below 80
percent of median county family income in 2000
Qualifying Criteria 5 —
The area is within a jurisdiction declared a disaster area by the President
of the United States within the last seven years
May 29, 2009
Economic Distress Factors
The current recession and a severe tightening of credit markets have had a dramatic
impact on all of the nation's cities and states — and San Diego is no exception.
Reduced economic activity overall has led to a spike in the local unemployment rate,
currently standing at 9.3%, the highest recorded in the County in over 26 years, and an
increase from 4.0% in 2006 when the application for the SDREZ was submitted to the
State. The concurrent reduction of payroll spending in the construction, manufacturing,
finance, and real estate sectors has in turn affected the wholesale and retail sectors,
resulting in further layoffs, store closures, and more payroll reductions. Between March
2008 and March 2009, nonfarm employment in San Diego County was down 44,600
jobs, a decline of 3.4 percent.
The City of San Diego metropolitan area has not been exempt from these affects with
companies leaving the downtown area or closing shop all together. With restaurant
business down 30% countywide, downtown San Diego's historic Gaslamp District with
over 130 restaurants is not exempt from this downturn. According to the Gaslamp
Quarter Association, downtown's dining scene has undergone a lot of changes recently
and the economy is the main reason. Whereas the downtown bistros change hands on
an average of three per year, the tally is on the rise.
Additionally, San Diego's downtown direct vacancy rate for office space has increased
from 3.8% in the third quarter of 2008 to 15.1 % in the first quarter of 2009, an increase
of 9.3%. During the same period the countywide office vacancy rate increased from
17.1 % to18.7%, an increase of only 1.6%. Office vacancy for the county is predicted to
increase to 24.5% before the market begins to improve in early to mid-2011. One
explanation for the increase in vacancy rate is due to functional obsolescence of many
buildings in the downtown area increasing at a faster pace than in previous periods.
The four (4) causes of functional obsolescence impacting San Diego's metropolitan
area are:
Technological — This is caused by the rate of change of electronic and other
means of communications. Technological changes also affect requirements for
air conditioning and heating systems. Another example of this is the inadequate
elevators in older buildings to accommodate workers who want faster service
with Tess congestion during "rush hours." Office and commercial space not built
or unable to feasibly accommodate green technology will also become obsolete.
The benefits of green buildings are reduced energy costs which can have
immediate impact to a company's operating budget.
Regulatory — Governmental regulations affecting building design and use impact
older buildings that do not contain costly up-to-date anti -earthquake design
features or comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Economic — Older buildings are often not able to accommodate the flexible space
partitions needed to cope with rapid changes in staffing and the downsizing of
office floor space per worker. Huge floor plates in some older skyscrapers are not
May 29, 2009
appropriate for the smaller firms that comprise larger and larger fractions of all
office occupants in today's economy nor flexible to accommodate large growing
companies. As a result, companies have moved out of San Diego's metropolitan
area or are looking to do so.
Site and Locational - Many buildings do not have enough parking to cope with
the higher -than -ever fractions of all workers who commute in their individual
vehicles alone or accommodate growing companies. Also businesses located in
less desirable areas are either being pushed out or relocating due to
redevelopment efforts. Examples of this are businesses located in buildings in
the East Village between Petco Ballpark and Interstate 5.
Another reason office space has been hit so hard is because demand is linked to job
growth and the region's unemployment rate has increased significantly during the same
period, from 5.2% to 9.3%. The continuing withdrawal of more and more economically
viable firms from the metropolitan area to suburb communities makes it more difficult for
Enterprise Zone residents to continue their employment without adequate private, public
or company subsidized transportation to get to the new job sites.
Redevelopment Projects
The EZ designation will assist San Diego to continue and complete on -going
revitalization efforts of the city, the Centre City Development Corporation (CCDC), the
Port of San Diego and various downtown non-profit business organizations. Some of
the revitalization efforts include the following new projects:
Navy Broadway Complex -
The project anchors the $230 million North Embarcadero Visionary Plan to
rebuild the public space from the airport to Seaport Villlage, creating a grand
esplanade and adding more than 12 acres of new waterfront plazas and park
lands.
Lane Field -
Lane Field encompasses approximately 5.7 acres of land located on the north
side of Broadway, between North Harbor Drive and Pacific Highway, adjacent to
the core of San Diego's downtown. In January 2009, the California Coastal
Commission unanimously approved a Port project for two hotels, restaurants and
retail stores on Lane Field, the former home of the Padres, a Major League
Baseball team.
Redeveloping Old Police Headquarters —
Old Police Headquarters is located south of Harbor Drive between Pacific
Highway and Kettner Boulevard. The site consists of 21.3 acres in the South
Embarcadero area of downtown San Diego. The project consists rehabilitating
the vacated former San Diego Police Headquarters from its current dilapidated
May 29, 2009
state into Old Police Headquarters a new tourist commercial center consisting of
a dynamic mix of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses . The
project also includes 4.5 acres of open space, a Pier Walk Building with a fish
processing facility, and waterfront restaurant and retail space. Once rejuvenated,
Old Police Headquarters will serve as an important Zink between the city's
resurgent downtown, a thriving Convention Center and hotel district, and its
active waterfront.
C Street Master Plan —
The updated community plan for downtown San Diego, the Centre City
Community Plan, places a high priority on improving C Street, making it a
comfortable and pleasant route for vehicles, walkers and transit riders.
Improvements to the trolley system and streetscape environment, along with
economic revitalization, will make it a vibrant destination for downtown workers,
residents and visitors. Plan defines specific improvements for the corridor,
including trolley, transit and infrastructure investments, streetscape
enhancements, improvement vehicular and pedestrian circulation,
redevelopment opportunities, and public art.
Downtown Parking Program —
The program's goal is to manage and address parking supply, mobility issues
and facilitate improvements and activities that increase the availability of supply
to ensure effective parking for residents, visitors, and employees within the
parking district.
Health and Human Services Capital Funding Assistance Program —
This program provides no -interest service repayment loans up to $1,000,000 to
qualified nonprofit organizations to assist with facility, relocation, rehabilitation
and/or expansion through building acquisition and/or rehabilitation proposals in
the downtown area.
Regional Economic Factors
Even before the onset of the current national recession, globalization and the high costs
of doing business in California greatly accelerated the Toss of manufacturing jobs -
including even those jobs in the high-tech industries upon which the State has become
so dependent. Responding to pressure for lower prices from retailers and their
consumers, multinational corporations began to rapidly "rationalize" production by
moving manufacturing operations directly to lower cost states and off -shore locations, or
by outsourcing these functions to third party contract manufacturers who have mastered
global supply -chain management systems. This loss of middle -income blue collar jobs
contributed to a situation which has long plagued San Diego — the inability to create
good "move -up" jobs for existing residents.
May 29, 2009
According to the Downtown San Diego Partnership, San Diego's metropolitan area has
approximately 7,500 businesses employing nearly 75,000 people. San Diego's
metropolitan is a major employment area for the region surrounded by San Diego and
National City neighborhoods (See Attachment 4) with high concentrations of
low/moderate income census tracts with nearly 82% of the population earning less than
the county's median income. Inclusion of all of the metropolitan area into the SDREZ
and not just the areas previously in the Metro Zone is vital to the region in order to retain
business near the residents that most need entry level jobs as well as jobs with career
ladder opportunities for the region.
Significant portions of the downtown area were previously in the MEZ that expired
October 14, 2006; therefore, approval of the boundary modification will allow
businesses in the expired MEZ to retroactively claim credits without a gap in benefits for
several more years in accordance with FTB regulations. Businesses within the
modification area but not previously in the MEZ will be able to claim credits back to the
designation date of the SDREZ, October 15, 2006.
Acreage
The modification acreage will not increase the total acreage of the SDREZ, in fact, the
total acreage at "final" designation will decrease from 34,720 acres to 34,375 acres, a
decrease of 344 acres. This is due to the fact that San Diego determined after the state
awarded the conditional designation that one very large census tract in its entirety is not
eligible and therefore 2,070 acres of the CT in question in the Otay Mesa area will be
removed when final designation is awarded. The 5% boundary modification permits up
to 1,736 acres to be added upon approval from the state. The proposed boundary
modification is for 1,725.69 acres of which 1,303.9 acres is in San Diego's metropolitan
area will help to close the acreage gap caused by the deletion of the 2,070 acres in
Otay Mesa. The future expansion capacity acreage Toss due to the acreage elimination
in Otay Mesa is 310 acres. Approval of the boundary modification reduces the Toss to
51 acres. This is significant as the need in the region far exceeds the expansion
capacity that will be available.
May 29, 2009
SDREZ BOUNDARY MODIFICATION
JUSTIFICATION TABLE
Table: San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone (SDREZ) Boundary Modification Justification
Jurisdiction
Area
Explanation
Acreage
San Diego
Metropolitan Area
The following Census Tracts/Block meet the State required
"qualifying criteria" but were not include in the original application
submittal due to a misinterpretation regarding minimum population
requirements. The population requirement of a minimum population
of 2,500 is for entire application area and not per census tract as
originally interpreted. Additionally, all or portions of the listed
census tracts were previously in the expired Metro Enterprise Zone
(10/14/06) with the exception of census block 56.001.
Zoning
The zoning for the entire metropolitan area of San Diego allows for
commercial uses include mixed use. Properties not included in the
modification are currently developed solely for residential or civic
purposes. These areas were identified and are not part of the
boundary modification request.
Census Tract 51.00
Justification:
Meets Qualifying Criteria 3, 4, and 5 (2006 Application Round)
Previously in the expired Metro Enterprise Zone (10/14/06)
This CT is contiguous the application area (Barrio Logan and
Sherman Heights communities) and includes the northern portion of
Port Terminal 10.
Census Tract 52.00
Justification:
Meets Qualifying Criteria 3, 4, and 5 (2006 Application Round)
Census Tract 53.00
(Excludes portions of non commercial developed properties)
Justification:
Meets Qualifying Criteria 3, 4, and 5 (2006 Application Round)
1303.9
SDREZ BOUNDARY MODIFICATION
JUSTIFICATION TABLE
Census Tract 54.00
(Excludes portions of non commercial developed properties)
Justification:
Meets Qualifying Criteria 3, 4, and 5 (2006 Application Round)
Census Block 56.001
(Excludes portions of non commercial developed properties)
Justification:
Meets Qualifying Criteria 3, 4, and 5 (2006 Application Round)
Census Tract 58.00
(Excludes portions of non commercial developed properties)
Justification:
Meets Qualifying Criteria 3, 4, and 5 (2006 Application Round)
2
San Diego
City Heights
Explanation included in document to HCD
148.45
3
San Diego
Mid -City & North Park
Explanation included in document to HCD
273.34
TOTAL
1725.69
l
l
May 2009
SDREZ Boundary Modification 2006 Enterprise Zone Application - Excerpt
SAN DIEGO REGION EZ LOCAL INCENTIVES NARRATIVE
Executive Summary
ATTACHMENT 1
located in San Diego County, the San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone (SDREZ)
encompasses portions of the cities of Chula Vista, National City and San Diego. With one of
the most ethnically diverse populations in the state, and residents from all walks of life and
socio-economic classes, each city in the multi jurisdictional SDREZ retains a cohesive identity
and a strong pride of place. The area's active and informed population is politically involved
in neighborhood -specific, community -wide and regional issues. The revitalization of older
neighborhoods, infrastructures, and business sectors are vital to attracting, retaining and
expanding, investment, existing businesses, as well as to create diverse, middle -income wage
paying employment opportunities in the SDREZ.
SDREZ faces serious challenges to that revitalization, however. Increasing poverty,
traffic congestion, water and air pollution, cost of energy, lack of affordable housing, and the
significant shift from middle -income industrial/manufacturing wage paying jobs to lower -
income retail/service sector wage paying jobs has resulted in stagnant real income growth,
income distribution worsens and the cost of living increases. Notably, tax revenue shortfalls
also threaten the area's ability to provide essential services.
Since 2002, structural and competitive shifts have had a profound and generally
negative impact on the local economy as "outsourcing" and "off -shoring" practices resulted in
plant closures, corporate downsizing and job losses. Additionally, the lack of affordable
housing near employment nodes has also led to a strain on our roads, freeways, infrastructure,
and environment, and affects the quality of life for all in the proposed SDREZ area. These
"shifts" have contributed to increased poverty throughout the proposed SDREZ area,
necessitating development of more approaches to neighborhood revitalization, business
development and job creation, such as using available tax incentives, and other incentives in
area's of need.
Strengthening existing, and developing new regional partnerships so that limited
resources can be leveraged to support effective marketing to further neighborhood
revitalization, business/job development, thus enhanced incentive programs are a vital
approach towards establishing diverse, vibrant economies. The attraction of new businesses
and support to "start-up" businesses is an important part of the City's strategy because it slows
down the normal process whereby money is accumulated and ultimately exported out of San
Diego into major deposit accounts in banks and other institutional firms.
The San Diego region is one of the top ten areas in the country projected for job growth
in the next 20 years. Many new jobs are currently being created by emerging high-technology
companies including telecommunications, electronics, computers, software, and biotechnology.
The expansion of high-technology industries in San Diego has successfully created higher
income employment opportunities for local residents and has also attracted others outside the
region seeking high-technology employment. Because these export -driven industries compete
I
May 2009 ATTACHMENT 1
SDREZ Boundary Modification 2006 Enterprise Zone Application - Excerpt
in national and international markets, they have favorable long-term growth potential and also
support locally -based firms which supply services and products.
However, the majority of additional jobs over the next few years will be in the services
industries. The continued success of the visitor industry and retail/business service
occupations has resulted in an increased percentage -of lower -wage employment in the cities of
the region. Unfortunately, the most significant decline in average wages in the region has
occurred in low -paying industries tbus potentially crating a larger income gap.
The regional priority must be to increase the quality of these jobs by encouraging the
development of career ladders in these low -wage industries; and continue attracting more
middle -income jobs which provide benefits, offers full-time employment, and is associated
with a career ladder. The business incentives available in the SDREZ will enhance attraction
of such middle -income employment opportunities.
A vibrant and prosperous regional economy is etsenlial for ensuring a high quality of
life and prosperity for all residents, workers and employers. As a region, we have most of the
components needed to make this community thrive. San Diego remains strong in its ability to
compete for manufacturing and R&D operations which involve high technologies and which
cannot be easily outsourced due to quality control concerns, regulatory requirements and
government security considerations.
SDREZ Economic Development Goals:
Job Creation Goals
One of the main goals of the SDR Enterprise Zone is job creation through business
attraction and developing existing businesses through business retention, expansion and
business assistance. The specific program goals of our EZ are to:
la Create sufficient job opportunities to lower the unemployment rate to 4.1% percent by the
year 2011; 4.0% percent by 2016; and, 3.9% percent by 2021.
n Target 50% percent of new jobs to CaIWORKS participants on an anneal basis.
n increase the average hourly rate for EZ vouchered employees to $11.50 by 2011.
in Issue 2,500 EZ vouchers annually.
m Target 50% of EZ vouchered job placements with SDREZ area residents annually by 2011,
increasing to 55% by 2016 and 60% by 2021
Business Retention/Expansion Goals:
® Assist in reducing the unemployment rate in our jurisdiction to 4.1%.
2
May 2009
SDREZ Boundary Modification 2006 Enterprise Zone Application - Excerpt
El Create an average of 150 new jobs per year from existing businesses.
• Target 50% percent of new jobs to Ca1WORKS participants.
® Utilizing the EZ tax incentives with the available local incentives and programs, retain 9
businesses and assist 15 businesses expand.
ATTACHMENT 1
Business Attraction goals are to:
® Assist in reducing the unemployment rate of our jurisdiction to 4.1%.
® Create an average of 600 new primary industry jobs per year by the year 2011; increasing
by at least 10% percent per year thereafter.
a Utilizing the EZ tax incentives with the available local incentives and programs, attract 12
new businesses.
Entrepreneurial programs and access to venture capital is an important aspect and can
play a major role in building the distinctiveness of the SDREZ. Successful business districts in
virtually any size community typically have a mix of uses that includes retail shopping,
professional, financial services, government services, entertainment, and housing, but are
mainly retail. Downtowns are the heart of communities and should be destination areas.
People want an experience when they go downtown. This is the premise of SDREZ to retain,
st,engthen and expand the existing business base in our community.
The following are incentive programs that our enterprise zone will provide to EZ
businesses:
LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INCENTIVES
The local business industry incentive program was created to improve the business
climate of the region, by providing certain financial incentives, and permit assistance to a
variety of business investors citywide. This program serves as the SDREZ's primary economic
development platform, and its incentives may be combined with those from other economic
development programs such as the Business Cooperation Program, the Guaranteed Water for
Industry Program, the Business Finance Program and with other incentives offered through the
Office of Small Business, the Renewal Community Program, the Enterprise Zone Program, the
Foreign Trade Zone and the City's Redevelopment Agency.
and:
Businesses that are consistent with the region's current economic development strategy
• Provide significant revenues and/or jobs that contribute to a sound and healthy
economy; or
• Promote the stability and growth of City taxes and other revenue; or
• Construct appropriate development in older parts of the City; or
3
San Diego Regional Enterprise Zone Boundary Modification
Qualifying Criteria s1:
Per Capita Income (www.census.gov)
increase must be 80% or less of
2000 Census Tract Per Capita Income 1
I. t!s luu0 Gcnxi' Trace Per Capita Income 2
Equal• ',aul increase in Per Cap`le Income 3
2(100 Census Stalewlde Per Capita Income 4
Less 1990 Census Statewide Per Capita Income 5
Equals Slalevede Increase In Per Capita Income 6
80% of Statewide Incaeese 8,214.03 ; 7
Does the tract quality?
(tract qualifies If Line 3 Is less Than Line 7)
Quollfying Criteria 02:
Unemployment Rat.(vvww.labormarkelinfo.edd.ca•gov)
Unemployment Rate __. _
must be al or greater _ 0.07 •
the tract level. use col.nty data to 0ue.•fy
2003 County Average Unemployment Rak
2004 County Average Unemployment Rai.
2003 City Average Unemployment Rale (if .opl'cade)
2004 Cily Average Unemployment Rate (if applicable)
Does the tract qualify?
(CITY E2•tract eualih.a if Linn 11 • 12 are greater than Lin. 8)
(CO wl CITY. tract qualifies If Lines 9 - 12 are greater Than Line 8)
Qualifying Criteria 93:
Poverty Level (www.census.gov)
Percentage of persona
below the Poverty Level C 0.15
2000 Total Number of Persona
2000 Told Number of Persons Below Poverty Level
Percentage below poverty level (Line 15 / Line 14)
Does the Tract qualify?
(tract qualifies If Line 16 is greater Than Line 13)
8
9
10
11
12
Tract Tract Tract Tract Tract Tract 1ract Tract Tract Block
16.00 17.00 16.00 21.00 5100 52.00 53.00 54.00 56.00 56.001
13830
144581 16440
16.597 00
14..146.00
10340
20741
22336
45144
16561
13481
Yes
0 05
0.05
0 05
0 05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0 05
0.05
0 05
0 05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
No
No
Nu
No
No
No
No
No
No
Nu
13
14
15
16
Qualifying Criteria 04:
Family Income (www.c.nsus.gov)
households had Incomes below 80
of the 2000 County MedienPsmlly
2000 County Median Femilll _53,438.00 . 17
80% of 2000 County Median 42,750.40 18
2000 Talal Number nl Households 19
70'b of 2000 Total Number of Households 20
Number of hwuseholds at a below amount Iran L•r•c 16 21
Dan eh• tract qualify?
(tract qualifies If Line 21 Is greater then Lin. 20)
6084
4687
817:
5;582
2885
2442
3636
• 3738
863
1043
1951
999
1417
1.465
1323
1812
2607
3231
740
311
0.32
0.20
0.23
0.26
0.48
0.74,
0.77
0.86
0.85
029
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yee 1 Yes
Yes
Yee
Yee
2332
2227
2816
2.418
712
1477
215n
2665
444
750
1632
1559
1973
1693
498
1034
1511
1866
311
511
1933
1877
2245
1.863
652
1282
1734
1425
344
695
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yea
Yes
Page 1
ATTACHMENT 2
l t l
Qualifying Criteria 85:
Area w.lhln the last seven ycarr (refer
Does the tract qualify?
Counties: Contra Costa
Del Norte
Fresno
Kern
Kings
Lake
Los Angeles
Madva
Marin
Mendocino
Monterey
Napa
Orange
Plumes
Riverside
Sacramento
San Bernardino
San Diego
San Joaquin
San Luis Obispo
Santa Barbara
Slskiyou
Solano
Sonoma
Tulare
Ventura
Summary;
Dona tract qualify under Criteria 1?
Does tract quallly under Criteria 2?
Does tract qualify under Criteria 3?
Does nett qualify under Criteria 0?
Does Iraol qualify under Criteria 57
Does the tract meet al least three out of live criteria?
Are the tracts contiguous?
Tracts Cuallhed for Enterprise Zone Designation:
22
Yes Yes Via Yvs Yes Yes Yes Yes •es Yes
f
Tract Tract Tract Tract Tract Tract Tract Traci Traci Blcok
16.00 17.00 18.00 21 51.00 52.00 53.00 50.00 56.00 56.001
8
k ;8
Yes
8
8
a
No
No
'No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ves
Yes
Ves
Yes
Yes
Ves
Yes
Yes
Ves
Ves
Ves
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ves
Yes
Ves
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yoe
ATTACHMENT 3
EXCERPT
California Enterprise Zone Program
2006 Application Guidebook
For Enterprise Zone Designation
PART I: ELIGIBILITY AFFIRMATION
To apply for an enterprise zone, a community must first establish its eligibility under the
regulations. A community can establish its eligibility either by (1) meeting specified criteria,
or (2) petitioning the Department. The following sections describe these two options and
the specific criteria that must be met.
Option 1: Eligibility Criteria
Under Option 1, a community can establish its eligibility by demonstrating that it contains an
"eligible area" within its jurisdiction. An eligible area shall consist of census tracts, block
groups, or enumeration districts with continuous boundaries with a population of at least
2,500 people. In addition, each census tract, block group, or enumeration district within the
eligible area must meet at least three or more of the following distress criteria:
1. The net increase in per capita income between 1990 and 2004 was 80 percent or
Tess of the statewide average;
2. The average rate of unemployment for both 2003 and 2004 was 7.4 percent or more;
3. The percentage of persons below the poverty level in 2000 was 15.2 percent or
more;
4. At least 70 percent of households had incomes below 80 percent of median county
family income in 2000; and
5. The area is within a jurisdiction declared a disaster area by the President of the
United States within the last seven years.
a
V
1SDREZ Application Area
1273.34 Acres
J.\
wIA.a .4,
3 1
3 i i
' SDREZ Application Area
1303.9 Acres
\'s
voitiraoo
Legend
111 Application Area Boundary
X I -I City Heights-148.45 Acres
1---1 Downtown-1303.9 Acres
North Park/Mid-City-273.34 Acres
SDREZ Boundary Modification
a
11,
•
CITY OF SAN DIEGO • CITY PLANNING & COMMUNITY INVESTMENT
...b. lit
IDREZ Application Area
148.45 Acres
• • 1 •
s
NO SCALE
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
14
'4' MEETING DATE July 21, 2009=
AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE
Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City authorizing the 30-day review and public comment
of the National City Police Department's grant application toward the purchase of police vehicles, electronic
police vehicles, in -vehicle cameras, still and video cameras, vehicle tracking system, police accessories and
outreach supplies, video surveillance vehicle video projectors, tasers and a mobile CAD system for the Police
Department utilizing $35,821.00 from the FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Local Solicitation Program.
PREPARED BY Lt. R.G. Triviz (Ext.4480
DEPARTMENT
Police Department
EXPLANATION The federal U.S. Department of Justice has announced the National City Police
Department would be awarded $ 35,821.00 or 100% in new funding from the FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial
Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Local Solicitation Program. The National City Police Department would utilize
the funds toward the purchase of Police Vehicles, Electronic Police Vehicles, In Vehicle Cameras, Still Cameras,
Video Cameras and Server, Vehicle Tracking System, Police Accessories and Outreach Supplies, Video
Surveillance Vehicle, Video Projectors, Tasers and a Mobile CAD System. The City is required to make the grant
application available for review by the City Council and assure that the application is made public and an
opportunity to comment is provided to citizens for not fewer than 30 days. The City is not required to allocate
any up front costs or matching funds to receive the funding. The FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice
Assistance Grant (JAG) Local Solicitation Program is a direct grant allocation that requires agencies to
complete an on-line application and narrative justifying the use of funds.
Environmental Review
Financial Statement NI N/A
Approved By.
inance Director
The FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Local Solicitation Program does
not require a match; therefore, there is no impact to the General Fund.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council begin the 30-day review and public comment period, and then
authorize the purchase of Police Vehicles, Electronic Police Vehicles, In Vehicle Cameras, Firing Range
Retro-Fit, Vehicle Tracking System, Video Surveillance Vehicle, Cameras, Video Projectors, Tasers and a Mobile
CAD System from the FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial JAG Local Solicitation Program utilizing
$35,821.00 in grant funding.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
Resolution No.
•
A-200 (9/99)
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY AUTHORIZING
THE 30-DAY PUBLIC REVIEW AND COMMENT
PERIOD FOR THE NATIONAL CITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT'S GRANT APPLICATION TOWARD THE
PURCHASE OF POLICE VEHICLES, ELECTRONIC
POLICE VEHICLES, IN -VEHICLE CAMERAS, STILL
AND VIDEO CAMERAS, VEHICLE TRACKING
SYSTEM, POLICE ACCESSORIES AND OUTREACH
SUPPLIES, VIDEO SURVEILLANCE VEHICLE VIDEO
PROJECTORS, TASERS AND A MOBILE CAD SYSTEM
FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT UTILIZING $35,821.00
FROM THE FY 2009 EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL
JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANT (JAG) LOCAL
SOLICITATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Justice has announced the
National City Police Department would be awarded $35,821.00 or 100% in new funding
from the FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Local
Solicitation Program; and
WHEREAS, the National City Police Department would utilize the funds
toward the purchase of Police Vehicles, Electronic Police Vehicles, In Vehicle Cameras,
Still Cameras, Video Cameras and Server, Vehicle Tracking System, Police
Accessories and Outreach Supplies, Video Surveillance Vehicle, Video Projectors,
Tasers and a Mobile CAD System; and
WHEREAS, the City is not required to allocate any up front costs or
matching funds to receive the funding; and
WHEREAS, the City is required to make the grant application available for
review by the City Council and assure that the application is made public and an
opportunity to comment is provided to citizens for not fewer than 30 days.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of National City hereby authorizes the 30-day public review and comment period for the
National City Police Department's grant application toward the purchase of police
vehicles, electronic police vehicles, in -vehicle cameras, still and video cameras, vehicle
tracking system, police accessories and outreach supplies, video surveillance vehicle
video projectors, tasers and mobile CAD system for the Police Department utilizing
$35,821.00 from the FY 2009 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG)
Local Solicitation Program.
Resolution No. 2009 —
July 21, 2009
Page 2
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21 st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
'EETING DATES July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO.
15
ITEM TITLE
Resolution to Approve the Salary Ranges for Two New Classifications Within the National City
Municipal Employees' Association Salary Schedule: Accountant Trainee ($3,207.45—$3,898.70,
monthly) and Management Analyst Trainee ($3,358.85—$4082.69, monthly)
PREPARED B
DEPARTMENT
n (336-4308) Human Resources
EXPLANATION
See Attachment
Environmental Review ✓ N/A
Financial Statement
There is no fiscal impact associated with approving the salary bands for these new classifications. Depart-
ments utilizing these new positions this fiscal year will do so with previously allocated budget dollars.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Recommend approval of resolution.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The creation of the classes was approved by the Civil Service Commission.
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No.
Resolution
A-200 (9/80)
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 —
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
APPROVING THE SALARY RANGES FOR TWO NEW
CLASSIFICATIONS WITHIN THE NATIONAL CITY MUNICIPAL
EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION SALARY SCHEDULE: ACCOUNTANT
TRAINEE ($3,207.45 - $3,898.70 MONTHLY) AND MANAGEMENT
ANALYST TRAINEE ($3,358.85 - $4,082.69 MONTHLY)
WHEREAS, in recent years, the City has experienced difficulty recruiting
qualified individuals at the journey level for professional and technical employment; and
WHEREAS, two of the most difficult classifications to recruit for are Accountant
and Management Analyst; and
WHEREAS, this difficulty in recruitment results in the inability of departments to
fill vacancies with qualified individuals, and an inability for recent college graduates or other
individuals otherwise new to their field to enter employment with the City; and
WHEREAS, while departments may be willing to hire individuals with limited or
no experience, appropriate classifications do not always exist to allow for this; and
WHEREAS, based on staffs recommendation, the Civil Service Commission
approved the creation of two new entry-level classifications: Accountant Trainee and
Management Analyst Trainee; and
WHEREAS, both classifications have a minimum bachelor's -level degree
requirement, thus creating professional level employment opportunities for recent college
graduates, and broadening the applicant pool for City departments; and
WHEREAS, these classifications are intended to be utilized to partially implement
the City's newly -created Career Advancement Program that will allow trainees to be promoted in
classification and compensation as they gain experience and expertise in the series in which
they serve; and
WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing, City staff has recommended that the City
Council approve the salary range for the classification of Accountant Trainee at $3,207.45 -
$3,898.70 per month, and the salary range for the classification of Management Analyst Trainee
at $3,385.87 - $4,082.69 per month.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
National City hereby approves the following salary ranges as part of the City of National City
Municipal Employees' Association Compensation Schedule:
Resolution No. 2009 —
July 7. 2009
Page 2
CLASSIFICATION SALARY RANGE MONTHLY COMPENSATION
Accountant Trainee 96 $3207.45 - $3898.70
Management Trainee 101 $3385.87 - $4082.69
PASSED and ADOPTED this 7th day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
+�-• CALIFORNIA
NA O L CJTV
INCORPORATED
DATE: June 24, 2009
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Stacey Stevenson, Director of Human Resources
SUBJECT: Request to Approve the Salary Ranges for Two New Classifications: Accountant
Trainee ($3,207.45—$3,898.70, monthly) and Management Analyst Trainee
($3,358.85---$4082.69, monthly)
Within the professional and technical categories, the current classification plan adopted by the
Civil Service Commission and the City Council of the City of National City consists primarily of
journey -level classifications and higher. In recent years, the City of National City has
experienced difficulty recruiting qualified individuals at the journey -level. Two of the most
difficult to recruit for series are Accountant and Management Analyst. The two resulting issues
are: the inability of departments to fill vacancies with qualified individuals; and an inability for
recent college graduates or other individuals otherwise new to the field to promote or enter
employment with the City of National City. While departments have expressed a willingness to
hire individuals with limited or no experience, the proper classifications do not always exist to
allow for it.
Based on the above, staff proposed, to the Civil Service Commission, the creation of two entry
level classifications: Accountant Trainee and Management Analyst Trainee. Both classifications
limit the minimum requirement to a four year degree thus creating professional level
employment opportunities within the City of National City for recent college graduates and
broadening the applicant pool for City departments.
The positions are intended to be utilized as part of the City's newly created Career Advancement
program that will allow such trainees to promote in classification and compensation as they gain
mastery of the journey -level functions of the series within which they serve. Under the program
guidelines, positions may be classified at or below the journey -level within the series.
Individuals will be selected and hired at the entry level or some other level in the designated
series below the classified level. Once the incumbent has the appropriate tenure and has
demonstrated competence, he/or she is eligible to be moved up to the next level in the series,
without competition. This process can be repeated until the individual has reached the level at
which the position is properly classified. As a pilot, staff proposes beginning with three (3)
series: Accountant, Code Conformance Officer and Management Analyst.
July 9, 2009
Honorable Mayor and City Council
Request to Approve the Salary Ranges for Two New Classifications: Accountant Trainee and
Management Analyst Trainee
Page 2
In executing the career advancement program, staff seeks the authorization of the City Council to
include the salary ranges for the newly created classifications in the City's National City
Municipal Employees' Association Compensation Schedule.
Based on the above, staff recommends the following:
Approve the following salary ranges as part of the City of National City Municipal
Employees' Association Compensation Schedule:
CLASSIFICATION SALARY RANGE MONTHY
Accountant Trainee 96
Management Trainee
COMPENSATION
$3207.45 - $3898.70
101 $3358.85 - $4082.69
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
`..)AEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO. 16
ITEM TITLE "arran -eggs er
o e
Amount of $1,035,713.64
PREPARED BY D. Gallegos -Finance
EXPLANATION.
DEPARTMENT Finance
Jeanette La
619-336-4331
Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued
for the period of 06/17/09 through 06/23/09.
The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants
Above $50,000.00
Vendor Check# Amount Explanation
LB Civil Construction 227599 676,079.05 Bay Marina Widening
SDG&E 227698 61,038.93 Utilities
Environmental Review N / A
Financial Statement
Not applicable.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Ratification of warrants in the amount of $1,035,713.64
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
1. Warrant Register #52
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) Resolution No.
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
1/3
PAYEE
FRANK TOYOTA
BEARD
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SVCS
HORIZON HEALTH EAP
HUSK PARTNERS
L.B. CIVIL CONSTRUCTION
ACCOUNTING UNIT EPA ID
ACTION TROPHIES & ENGRAVING
ADDICTION MEDICINE
AFLAC
AIRGAS - WEST
ALL FRESH
AMERICAN ROTARY BROOM CO. INC
ARJIS
ASSI SECURITY
BROADWAY AUTO ELECTRIC
CA SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL
LIFORNIA BAKING CO.
.IFORNIA ELECTRIC SUPPLY
'411•1KRQUEST AUTO PARTS
CHEVRON & TEXACO BUSINESS CARD
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CINGULAR WIRELESS
CINTAS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
CLEAN HARBORS
COMMERCIAL AQUATICS INC.
COMMERCIAL AQUATICS SERVICES
CONSTRUCTION ELECTRONICS INC.
CORPORATE EXPRESS
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
COX COMMUNICATIONS
D MAX ENGINEERING INC
DAPPER TIRE COMPANY
DAY WIRELESS SYSTEMS
DELL MARKETING CORP
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
DISCOUNT SPECIALTY CHEMICALS
DIXIELINE LUMBER CO.
4EW FORD
�.,,,� 3OMETRICS
TS1NAA CALIFORNIA CHAPTER
FBINAA CALIFORNIA CHAPTER
FEDEX
FENTON
FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC
C
A --
N O 8 7TED
3
WARRANT REGISTER # 52
6/23/2009
DESCRIPTION
2009 TOYOTA PRIUS HYBRID
REIMB-REVOLVING LOAN FUND GRANT TRA
CREDIT BACKGROUND CHECK FOR S8
EMP ASSIST PROGRAM JUN 09 - CDC
CONSULTING SERVICES - JUNE 2009
MAY 2009 SERVICES
EPA ID NUMBER VERIFICATION COST
BLUE ACCOUNTABILITY TAGS
MEDICAL SERVICES
AFLAC ACCOUNT BDM36 JUNE 2009
HELIUM
FOOD/CONSUMABLES
SWEEPER REPAIRS
ARJIS COSTS, JPA COSTS, ARJIS
CITY-WIDE SECURITY REPAIRS
ELECTRICAL PARTS FOR CITY VEHICLES
LUCHEON MEETING 06/30/09
BREAD PRODUCTS
MOP #45698 ELECTRICAL MATERIAL
MOP #47557 11 OZ SMART STRAW
MOP #45699 FUEL
CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE EXAMS
TUITION: SFST COURSE
PD WIRELESS SVC 05/06-06/05/09
MONTHLY SHREDDING
PETTY CASH PPE MAY 31, 2009
HAZARDOUS WASTE PICKUP
LAMOTTE TEST TABLETS, PHENOL RED
TRAVEL CHARGE (ZONE 5)
COVERAGE MAINTENANCE - JUNE 09
MOP #45704 CHAIR MATS SUPRMT
PERMIT RENEWAL -FIRE STATION#34
SHARE OF PARKING CITATION REV
MAIL PROCESSING SERVICES
INTERNET DATA SVC 06/07-07/06/09
MAY 2009 SERVICES
TIRES FOR CITY FLEET
SVC AGREEMENT FOR FIRE DEPT
QUAD CORE OPTERON/HARD DRIVES
NEW EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT TEST
IRATIC SALT REMOVER
MOP #45707 LEVEL, CUTTER, HEADLAMP
MOP #49078 SHAFT ASSEMBLY
FIRE CAPTAIN TEST
2009 FBINAA ADVANCED TRAINER
2009 FBINAA ADVANCED TRAINER
TECH PERSONNEL SERVICES
SANDPIPA - SPECIAL MEETING
MOP #45723 PVC, COUPLINGS
CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
227594 6/17/09 1,411.88
227595 6/22/09 792.35
227596 6/23/09 75.21
227597 6/23/09 114.56
227598 6/23/09 7,500.00
227599 6/23/09 676,079.05
227600 6/23/09 15.00
227601 6/23/09 16.04
227602 6/23/09 800.00
227603 6/23/09 1,543.64
227604 6/23/09 23.14
227605 6/23/09 5,103.00
227606 6/23/09 568.28
227607 6/23/09 40.00
227608 6/23/09 325.00
227609 6/23/09 538.31
227610 6/23/09 34.00
227611 6/23/09 118.80
227612 6/23/09 153.42
227613 6/23/09 26.27
227614 6/23/09 323.53
227615 6/23/09 1,182.00
227616 6/23/09 260.00
227617 6/23/09 613.60
227618 6/23/09 72.95
227619 6/23/09 773.75
227620 6/23/09 992.00
227621 6/23/09 151.46
227622 6/23/09 4,989.78
227623 6/23/09 843.55
227624 6/23/09 546.82
227625 6/23/09 420.00
227626 6/23/09 4,341.25
227627 6/23/09 6,673.68
227628 6/23/09 3,600.00
227629 6/23/09 29,772.97
227630 6/23/09 2,392.32
227631 6/23/09 1,095.97
227632 6/23/09 9,354.56
227633 6/23/09 388.00
227634 6/23/09 92.72
227635 6/23/09 1,039.52
227636 6/23/09 706.18
227637 6/23/09 581.35
227638 6/23/09 250.00
227639 6/23/09 250.00
227640 6/23/09 123.55
227641 6/23/09 141.80
227642 6/23/09 1,155.08
2/3 -
FIRE SERVICE SPECIF. & SUPPLY
GISI
GOVERNMENT JOBS COM INC
GRAINGER
GRANICUS INC.
HAMILTON MEATS & PROVISIONS
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
HD SUPPLY
HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC
HONEYWELL INC.
HORIZON HEALTH EAP
HUNTER'S NURSERY INC.
HYDRO-SCAPE PRODUCTS INC.
IAFC
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
INTEGRATED BIOMETRIC
JJJ ENTERPRISE
JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES
JUDD ELECTRIC
KOAZ INC
LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC.
MAINTEX, INC.
MALLORY FIRE
MANPOWER OF SAN DIEGO
MASON'S SAW & LAWNMOWER SRVC
MAYER HOFFMAN MCCANN P C
MCGUIRE DISTRIBUTION
MEJIA
MORE DIRECT
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NATIONAL CITY AUTO TRIM
NATIONAL CITY TROPHY
NEXUS INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS
ONE STOP PARTS SOURCE
ORKIN PEST CONTROL
PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
PADRE JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, INC
PARKHOUSE TIRE
PARTS PLUS AUTOSTORE #711
PBS&J
PDSI
PEACE OFFICERS RESEARCH
PEREZ
PERFORMANCE CASTERS &
PERRY FORD
PORAC LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO INC
PROCHEM SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC
PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS INC
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY
REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM
RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
SALTO
WORK ON HOLMATRO RESCUE TOOLS
TRAFFIC COLLISION INVESTIGATION
EXPERT & CONSULTANT SERVICES
MOP 65179 CORDLESS DRILL
SOFTWARE MODULES MEDIA MGR
MEAT PRODUCTS
MAY 2009 SERVICES
PLUMBING MATERIAL OVER COUNTER
AUDIT SVCS - TRANSACTIONS TAX
MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE
EMP ASSIST PROGRAM JUN 09 - CITY
MOP #65179 SHRUBS, GRAPE MYRTLE
MOP #45720 PVC COUPLINGS
IAFC MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL-JUNIEL
COPIER MAINTENANCE
NEW EMPLOYEE FINGERPRINT TEST
REPAIRS - OUTSIDE SCOPE
MOP #69277 TOPSOIL AMENDED VENDOR \ 227660
CITY-WIDE ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 227661
SIGNATURE STAMP 227662
OUTSIDE LABOR 227663
MISC JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 227664
STREAMLIGHT SURVIVOR 227665
WEEK ENDING 06/07/09 227666
MOP #45729 SMALL TOOLS 227667
FINAL BILLING ANNUAL AUDIT OF CNC 227668
MILK PRODUCTS 227669
TUITION REIMB-FSTEP COURSE 227670
SWITCH/HP MODULE/PROCURVE MINI 227671
MOP #45735 AIR FILTERS 227672
MOP #72441 UPHOLSTERY REPAIRS 227673
MOP #66556 NAME PLATES & HOLDERS 227674
PHONE SYSTEM (PBX) MAINTENANCE 227675
PF CARBON METAL 227676
PEST MAINTENANCE FOR CITY BLDGS 227677
1200 SKY HAND DRYER 227678
JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 227679
11R22.5 H GEN D450 PREM/DR TL 227680
MOP 64946 GATORBACK POLY V-BELT 227681
PROVIDE WASTEWATER FINANCIAL SVC 227682
TELESTAFF ANNUAL SVC & SUPPORT 227683
PORAC/PEACE OFFICER RESEARCH 227684
REFUND -REDUCED PARKING CITATION 227685
RUBBERMAID WHEELS 227686
ABS MODULE REPAIRS 227687
LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 227688
MOP #67839 D750U BATTERY YELLOW 227689
#8505 HEATING ELEMENT 227690
PAYMENT OF CREDIT CARD READER 227691
MOP #45742 UNIFORMS - PARKS 227692
COMMUNICATIONS SYS - MAY 2009 227693
TUITION: TRAFFIC COLLISION INVEST 227694
REFUND - DISMISSED CITATION 227695
227643 6/23/09 729.08
227644 6/23/09 668.36
227645 6/23/09 2,500.00
227646 6/23/09 256.29
227647 6/23/09 1,477.35
227648 6/23/09 969.78
227649 6/23/09 13,299.50
227650 6/23/09 357.75
227651 6/23/09 4,906.08
227652 6/23/09 3,804.12
227653 6/23/09 737.48
227654 6/23/09 200.02
227655 6/23/09 425.74
227656 6/23/09 249.00
227657 6/23/09 2,201.30
227658 6/23/09 18.00
227659 6/23/09 110.00
6/23/09 719.49
6/23/09 4,940.76
6/23/09 22.83
6/23/09 345.00
6/23/09 1,524.06
6/23/09 3,050.1Ns
6/23/09 883.20
6/23/09 33.29
6/23/09 1,000.00
6/23/09 307.02
6/23/09 170.00
6/23/09 9,340.71
6/23/09 129.61
6/23/09 224.99
6/23/09 49.39
6/23/09 852.00
6/23/09 175.29
6/23/09 561.50
6/23/09 301.81
6/23/09 206.52
6/23/09 1,154.46
6/23/09 71.00
6/23/09 5,020.00
6/23/09 8,305.50
6/23/09 80.00
6/23/09 305.00
6/23/09 143.98
6/23/09 636.44
6/23/09 96.00
6/23/09 184.2E
6/23/09 98.7b410.
6/23/09 522.35
6/23/09 649.06
6/23/09 9,045.90
6/23/09 174.00
6/23/09 305.00
3/3
r..
SAN DIEGO SPORTS MEDICINE
SD BMW MOTORCYCLES
SDG&E
SMART & FINAL
SOLANA CENTER
SOUTHERN CALIF TRUCK STOP
SOUTHERN CALIF. RADAR/LASER
STARK MFG CO
STRATACOM
SUN BADGE COMPANY INC.
SYSCO SAN DIEGO
TARULLI TIRE SAN DIEGO INC
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON
THE LIGHTHOUSE, INC.
TOM MOYNAHAN
TRAINING FOR SAFETY INC
TRAINING INNOVATIONS
U S HEALTHWORKS
VERIZON WIRELESS
WADE & ASSOCIATES
WATERLINE TECHNOLOGIES
'EST GOVERNMENT SERVICES
STFLEX INDUSTRIAL
%140TLLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY
WOOD & WOOD
ZEE MEDICAL, INC.
ZOLL MEDICAL CORP.
SECTION 8 HAPS PAYMENTS
(40) EXAMS FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE OF POLICE
FACILITIES DIVISION
MOP 5756 FIRE RECRUITMENT-COMM SVC
PURCHASING OF RECYCLED ITEMS
MOP #45758 PROPANE
RECERTIFICATION OF 4 LIDAR GUNS
REPAIR 2 TURNOUT JACKETS
BUSINESS CARD IMPRINTS
BADGE FOR COUNCILMEMBERS
FOOD/CONSUMABLES
MOP #47940 TIRE REPAIRS
ADMIN CHARGES 1998-1999 TAB
MOP #45726 MIRROR ASSEMBLY
MOP 45734 TOWING CHARGES
TUITION: ADV DISPATCHER UPDATE
SOFTWARE FOR TRAINING COORDINATOR
MEDICAL SERVICES
VERIZON WIRELESS 04/27-05/26/09
RESURFACING, PHASE II 08-4
MUNICIPAL POOL CHEMICALS
AUTO TRACK DATABASE - MAY 2009
MOP63850 CLEANING MENDER STEEL
MOP 45763 MINI HUB
LIABILITY CLAIM COSTS
17 ICE PACK
AUTOPULSE SYSTEM
Start Date End Date
6/17/2009 6/23/2009
227696 6/23/09
227697 6/23/09
227698 6/23/09
227699 6/23/09
227700 6/23/09
227701 6/23/09
227702 6/23/09
227703 6/23/09
227704 6/23/09
227705 6/23/09
227706 6/23/09
227707 6/23/09
227708 6/23/09
227709 6/23/09
227710 6/23/09
227711 6/23/09
227712 6/23/09
227713 6/23/09
227714 6/23/09
227715 6/23/09
227716 6/23/09
227717 6/23/09
227718 6/23/09
227719 6/23/09
227720 6/23/09
227721 6/23/09
227722 6/23/09
GRAND TOTAL
A/P Total
14,650.00
51366
61,038.93
64.43
910.82
21.69
375 00
40.00
95.49
214.23
7,238.83
455.00
3,604.00
56.72
135.00
285.00
575.00
475.00
726.14
8,316.25
786.65
200.00
13.61
63.25
24, 531.93
58.05
53, 051.52
1,031,441.79
4,271.85
$ 1,035,713.64
+�- CALIFORNIA —rt*
NATI ITy
a C
INCORPORATED -)
Warrant Register # 52
6/23/2009
001 GENERAL FUND
105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND
109 GAS TAXES FUND
111 P.O.S.T. FUND
115 PARK & REC CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND
130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND
136 TINY TOT CLASSES FUND
166 NUTRITION
172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND
261 CDC DEBT SERVICE FUND
307 PROPOSITION "A" FUND
502 SECTION 8 FUND
511 TAX INCREMENT FUND
626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND
628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND
629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE
630 OFFICE EQUIPMENT DEPRECIATION
631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING
632 GENERAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES
643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND
644 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RESERVE
101,656.93
1,537.75
0.25
668.36
450.00
36,427.63
48,352.31
439.93
13, 967.09
2,114.81
3,604.00
8,749.20
4,326.02
684,507.00
50,667.70
24,531.93
2,201.30
28,325.66
1,634.40
5,791.74
5,973.68
8,374.07
1,411.88
1,035,713.64
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
`'rMEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO. 17
ITEM TITLE " arran - egis
Amount of $1,733,936.16
PREPARED BY D. Gallegos -Finance
EXPLANATION.
roug
DEPARTMENT Finance
Jeanette Ladri
619-336-4331
Per Government Section Code 37208, attached are the warrants issued
for the period of 06/24/09 through 06/30/09.
The Finance Department has implemented a policy to provide explanation of all warrants
Above $50,000.00
Vendor
Boys& Girls Club
MJC Contruction
Public Emp Ret Sys
Christmas In July
Check#
227749
227767
227774
227790
Amount
60,000.00
84,722.00
272,621.62
92,976.00
Explanation
Program
Afterschool Program
Rehab Furnishing
Emp Ret Sys
PPE 06/15/09
Grant for NC Youth
Program
J
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
Not applicable.
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Ratification of warrants in the amount of $1,733,936.16
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
1. Warrant Register #53
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
Resolution No.
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
1/2
PAYEE
DAPPER TIRE COMPANY
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRIC
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
BRG CONSULTING, INC
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSO
CHRISTENSEN & SPATH LLP
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DESROCHERS
EDCO DISPOSAL
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS SERVICES
FEDEX
GE CAPITAL
GTC SYSTEMS INC
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL ALLERGY SUPPLY INC
NBS
PYATOK ARCHITECTS INC
)G&E
iADLING YOCCA CARLSON &
'(EETWATER AUTHORITY
THE STAR NEWS
URBAN FUTURES
WELLS FARGO BANK
AIRGAS - WEST
ALL FRESH
BATTERIES PLUS
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
CALIFORNIA COMMERCIAL SECURITY
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY ADOPTION CO
CHAPIN
CITY OF CARLSBAD
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CORPORATE EXPRESS
COURTYARD SACRAMENTO CAL EXPO
DATA TICKET INC
DELA CUADRA
GONZALEZ
HERNANDEZ
HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & ASSOC
KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES
LADRIDO
LASER SAVER INC
\CIAS
\re GUIRE DISTRIBUTION
MJC CONSTRUCTION
MUNISERVICES LLC
MX LOGIC, INC
MYERS TIRE SUPPLY
N C CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
NA' Cry
£P%.1I
NCORPORATED
WARRANT REGISTER # 53
6/30/2009
DESCRIPTION
TIRES FOR CITY FLEET
REFUND -ENTERPRISE ZONE
COMMUNITY YOUTH ATHLETIC CENTER
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CRA LAWSUIT ASSESSMENT
HOUSING LEGAL SERVICES
MARY 2009 SERVICES, SPEC 08-13
RETIREMENT BENEFIT - JUNE2009
1615 E 4TH STREET - MAY 2009
HUD HEALTHY HOMES DEM GRANT
COURIER SERVICES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
REIMB-HEALTHY HOMES DEM
AQUATIC CENTER
REIMB HEALTHY HOMES DEM
PBID ADMINSTRATION
WESTSIDE INFILL TOD - MAY 2009
921A AVE 05/19 - 06/18/09
RDA GENERAL SERVICES
1310 HIGHLAND AVE
NC EVENTS AD
IMPLEMENTATION PERFORMANCE
CREDIT CARD EXPENSES
HELIUM
FOOD
ITEM NO. EN91. AA BATTERIES
AFTERSCHOOL PROGRAM APR-JUN 09
LABOR, ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN
PARADISE CREEK LITTER REMOVAL
REIMB FOR PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES
TECHNICAL PERSONNEL CHARGES
MAY 2009 SVCS BLDG/PARKS
MOP 45704 BATTERIES - PD
HOTEL RES: CONTINUING CHALLENGE
PC PROCESSING. APPEALS - MAY 09
P/R DIRECT DEPOSIT REJECTED
REIMB-H HOMES UNIT REPAIRS
MILEAGE REIMB-BASIC SWAT COURSE
CONTRACT SVCS-SALES TAX 2ND QTR
CHAIN ASSEMBLY TOOL
MILEAGE REIMB 09 GASB WORKSHOP
MOP 45725 TONERS - PD
DIRECT DEPOSIT REJECTED
MILK PRODUCTS
REHAB FURNISHING 07-6B
SALES/DISTRICT TAX AUDIT
SPAM EMAIL FILTERING/WEB SVCS
VIBRATION CNTR PLATES, CNTR STUD
CITY ENHANCEMENT GRANT
CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
227723 6/24/09 3,818.56
227724 6/25/09 12,365.44
227725 6/30/09 151.18
227726 6/30/09 12,055.00
227727 6/30/09 626.00
227728 6/30/09 985.00
227729 6/30/09 18,271.00
227730 6/30/09 110.00
227731 6/30/09 104.75
227732 6/30/09 708.00
227733 6/30/09 96.66
227734 6/30/09 420.86
227735 6/30/09 1,006.25
227736 6/30/09 900.00
227737 6/30/09 1,329.00
227738 6/30/09 2,276.47
227739 6/30/09 17,156.14
227740 6/30/09 187.89
227741 6/30/09 1,670.50
227742 6/30/09 1,048.63
227743 6/30/09 154.35
227744 6/30/09 1,365.00
227745 6/30/09 2,826.34
227746 6/30/09 139.34
227747 6/30/09 287.11
227748 6/30/09 146.71
227749 6/30/09 60,000.00
227750 6/30/09 1,913.25
227751 6/30/09 960.00
227752 6/30/09 60.48
227753 6/30/09 161.45
227754 6/30/09 27,520.83
227755 6/30/09 900.75
227756 6/30/09 583.84
227757 6/30/09 1,245.65
227758 6/30/09 350.00
227759 6/30/09 320.00
227760 6/30/09 124.14
227761 6/30/09 3,058.63
227762 6/30/09 61.56
227763 6/30/09 99.34
227764 6/30/09 304.31
227765 6/30/09 74.34
227766 6/30/09 279.10
227767 6/30/09 84,722.00
227768 6/30/09 7,698.22
227769 6/30/09 441.00
227770 6/30/09 519.74
227771 6/30/09 7,500.00
C¢,L:FO.ilia
,
2/2
PAYEE
NEXUS INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS
PERRY FORD
PUBLIC EMP RETIREMENT SYSTEM
RED WING SHOES
ROUNDS
SALAZAR
SKS INC.
SMART & FINAL
SOUTHLAND AUTO BODY
STRATACOM
SYSCO SAN DIEGO
TETRA TECH ASL, INC.
U S HEALTHWORKS
ULTIMATE STAFFING SERVICES
ULTIMATE STAFFING SERVICES
WILKINS
WILLY'S ELECTRONIC SUPPLY
PROGRESSIVE SOLUTIONS INC
CHRISTMAS IN JULY
GARDA CL WEST, INC.
SECTION 8 HAPS PAYMENTS
PAYROLL
Pay period Start Date
13 6/2/2009
- INCORPORATED —1
WARRANT REGISTER # 53
6/30/2009
DESCRIPTION
PHONE SYSTEM (PBX) MAINTENANCE
LABOR FOR REPAIRS
SERVICE PERIOD 06-09-4
SAFETY SHOES
SLI APPLICANT POOL
MILEAGE REIMB-CMRTA QTR MEETING
VALMAXLIFE ATF BULK
MOP 45756 STORE SUPPLIES - CS
BUMPER, CORNER LAMP, PAINT
MOP 63845 LETTERHEAD IMP - ENG
FOOD/CONSUMABLES
PUMP STA INSPECTION 04-8
PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
TEMPORARY EMP - NEIGHBORHOOD
TEMPORARY EMP - NEIGHBORHOOD
EDUCATIONAL REIMB
MOP 45763 LITHIUM BATTERIES
CASHIER -SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE
CDBG GRANT FOR NC YOUTH PROGRAM
SVC PERIOD JUNE 08 THRU FEB 09
Start Date
6/24/2009
End Date
6/15/2009
End Date
6/30/2009
Check Date
6/24/2009
CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
227772 6/30/09 524.00
227773 6/30/09 1,007.46
227774 6/30/09 272,621.62
227775 6/30/09 125.00
227776 6/30/09 419.58
227777 6/30/09 77.69
227778 6/30/09 3,300.00
227779 6/30/09 600.47
227780 6/30/09 532.46
227781 6/30/09 183.83
227782 6/30/09 1,284.16
227783 6/30/09 12,816.26
227784 6/30/09 1,435.00
227785 6/30/09 951.60
227786 6/30/09 756.52
227787 6/30/09 609.75
227788 6/30/09 167.92
227789 6/30/09 23,288.1.'
227790 6/30/09 92,976.0011S
227791 6/30/09 2,831.82
A/P Total 695,614.08
5,102.78
1,033,219.30
GRANT) TOTAL $ 1,733,936.16
INCORPORATED
Warrant Register # 53
6/30/2009
001 GENERAL FUND
104 LIBRARY FUND
105 PARKS MAINTENANCE FUND
109 GAS TAXES FUND
111 P.O.S.T. FUND
125 SEWER SERVICE FUND
130 EMT-D REVOLVING FUND
154 STATE PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND
158 SWIMMING POOL REVOLVING FUND
166 NUTRITION
171 LIBRARY SCHOOL DISTRICT CNTRCT
172 TRASH RATE STABILIZATION FUND
173 NATIONAL SCHOOL DIST CONTRACT
174 SWEETWATER SCHOOL DIST CONTRAC
191 STOP PROJECT
211 SECURITY AND ALARM REGULATION FUND
212 PERSONNEL COMPENSATION FUND
230 ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT GRANT
246 WINGS GRANT
282 REIMBURSABLE GRANTS CITYWIDE
290 POLICE DEPT GRANTS
294 HUD HEALTHY HOMES GRANT
301 GRANT-C.D.B.G.
307 PROPOSITION A" FUND
320 LIBRARY GRANTS
502 SECTION 8 FUND
505 HOME FUND
506 HOME LOAN PROGRAM FUND
511 TAX INCREMENT FUND
522 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING FUND
626 FACILITIES MAINT FUND
627 LIABILITY INS. FUND
628 GENERAL SERVICES FUND
629 INFORMATION SYSTEMS MAINTENANC
631 TELECOMMUNICATIONS REVOLVING
632 GENERAL ACCOUNTING SERVICES
643 MOTOR VEHICLE SVC FUND
1,171,020.06
28,442.59
21,734.19
3,612.35
543.72
32,475.47
11, 562.74
829.57
1,049.07
13,232.18
649.27
3,924.69
1,116.78
5,147.91
2,820.01
1,148.23
1,666.26
3,519.16
38,413.62
741.52
2,587.35
4,254.32
3,320.09
19,684.64
5,504.24
25,795.17
559.26
92,976.00
138,254.50
2,404.94
20,854.47
3,696.64
2,943.24
26,455.08
1,957.90
19,100.20
19,938.73
1,733,936.16
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
`,.SLEETING DATE July 21, 2009 AGENDA ITEM NO.
18
(TEM TITLE
inConsider r d Ne Negative Declaration nd a 7-Lot Residential
Continued Public Hearing to a Proposed g ea
Tentative Subdivision Map Including Requests for Exceptions for Increased Density, Reduced Lot Sizes
and Lot Frontage; Variance Requests to Allow 3-Story Structures for 2-Units, 3-Foot Side Yard Setbacks
for 3-Units, and 16.5-Foot Front Yard Setbacks for 4-Units; and a Request to Waive Utility
Undergrounding Fronting Prospect Street at 2121 Grove Street
(Applicant: Arnold Schmidt) (Case File No. 2007-59 S, IS, Z)
PREPARED BY
EXPLANATION
Peggy Chapi336-4319 DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
On May 5, 2009, the Council considered the proposed project and concurred with the Planning
Commission's recommendation and denied the 7-unit residential subdivision. On May 29, 2009, the Council
reconsidered the Resolution to deny the project and recommended the applicant modify the project design
to provide a deeper front yard to allow for parking in the driveway. On June 16, 2009, the Council conducted
a public hearing and reviewed the design changes which reflected an increased driveway depth from 10 feet
to 16.5 feet with a second story deck extending over the driveway by 3.5 feet. The City Council concluded,
based on public testimony that residents had not had adequate opportunity to review the revised plans. The
Council requested the applicant conduct a community meeting to present the project plans. The public
hearing was continued until July 21, 2009.
Since June 16th, city staff has made the project plans available on the City's website. The applicant has
scheduled a community meeting for July 9th and will be available this evening to discuss the outcome of that
meeting. A summary of the project is attached as are Findings for Approval and Findings for Denial for
Council consideration.
Environmental Review
A Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA
Financial Statement
N/A
Approved By: N/A
Account No.
Finance Director
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Negative Declaration t e -unit residenti. • • • ision as presented.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission recommended denial of the proposed development on April 6, 2009.
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. Project Summary 4.Findings for Denial 7. Project Plans dated 5/28/09
2. Location Map 5. Draft Conditions of Approval
3. Findings for Approval 6. Negative Declaration
A-200 (9/99)
Project Summary
The applicant proposes a 7-unit subdivision situated between Grove Street and Prospect Street,
north of 22nd Street within the RS-3-PD zone. Lots 1 — 4 would front on Grove Street whereas lots
5 — 7 would take access on a proposed private roadway from Prospect Street. An existing
residence on site is proposed to be relocated to lot 5. The four parcels (lots 1-4) fronting on Grove
Street are proposed with Tots sizes ranging from 2,904 to 3,096 square feet. The three parcels
(lots 5-7) are proposed with Tots sizes ranging from 5,160 (net sq. ft) to 6,174 square feet.
The applicant requests several variances and exceptions as well as an underground waiver
request. The applicant indicates that the project would receive utility service from Grove Street
which would be placed underground. An underground waiver is requested to retain an existing
pole fronting on Prospect Street which would not serve the project. During the design phase, if
the utility company determines that service should be provided from Prospect Street, those
utilities would be placed underground. The following table reflects the variance and exception
requests.
Land Use
Standards
Proposed Variances and Exceptions Requested
(noted in bold)
Lots 1- 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
Lot 7
5,000 s.f. Lot Size
50-foot Lot Width
Lot sizes ranging
from 2,904 to
3,906 s.f., Lot
width approx. 30
ft.
6,174 s.f.
5,283 s.f.
gross s. f.
s.
7,3175,1net s.f.
20-ft Front Yard
Setback from
Public Street
5-ft. Side Yard
Setback
5-ft. Rear Yard
Setback
16.5' front yd
setback
3-foot interior side
yard setbacks,
5-foot exterior side
yard setbacks
30 foot rear yard
set back
Minimum frontyard setback not
required when
fronting on a
private street
7.5-foot side
y and
31-foot rear yard
set back
Minimum front
yard setback not
required when
fronting on a
private street
5-foot side yard
set back
35 foot rear yard
set back
39-foot front yard
set back
5-foot side yard
setback
41-foot rear yard
setback
Street Frontage
Yes
No
No
No
Two Stories/
35-foot height
2-story with
basement
24-foot height.
2-story
32 ft. height
3-story
32 ft. height
3-story
32 ft height
Density of 8.7 or 6
units
9.85 Density or 7 units
Environmental Review
A proposed Negative Declaration was prepared and no significant impacts were identified. There
were no comments received during the 20-day public review period which ended on April 6, 2008.
1
, .
Nc32-6
.0.\?).- • - - .01)
1929
_ 14D- 20-‘-
1421,
--
VS?"' 3 ' . '406
(I) - ,o
'--_ - -
(13...
016 - ,
0 2026
20\
kV Q,
-1-) -
0 2a‘)
C.) 204c)
OD) G. _ -
01
(i2..‘
2 .0.‘
2
1:\„
V.??
7205
,2.13()
Dag"
TO_
2"v‘
2:3\c3
23`2:' 2:02
,s1\
202-(1
v2-4
70"v.
2A2'
722"
72,4
100 0 100 200 Feet
PIZ().11:e T AREA 1
---;,'/11,-,--,..::.;:
LOCATION MAP 2007-59S,IS,7
Tentative Subdivision Map and Finding of No Significant Environmental Effect
for a subdivision with nine (9) lots at 2121 Grove Street
NATIONAL CIT2Y PLANNING
ORN. DATE:
5/27/08
PC
HEARING:
4/6/09
CASE NO. 2007-59 S, IS, Z
2121 GROVE STREET
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL
OF A SEVEN LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
1. The proposed map will not have a significant effect on the environment since the site is
currently developed and is located within a fully urbanized area.
2. The proposed map is consistent with many of the goals of the National City General Plan and
Housing Element, since the General Plan/Zone designation for the site, Single -Family
Extendible - Planned Development, RS-3-PD, provides for the creation of single-family homes
and the project is consistent with General Plan Housing Element goals, including the creation of
housing opportunities, promotion of a higher rate of homeownership (Policy X, pp. 26), and
production of moderate and iniddle income ranges to allow mobility in housing supply (Policy
S, pp 25)).
3. The site is physically suitable for the proposed type of development, since the project would
include seven single-family homes with adequate parking and open space, in an urbanized,
developed area, and since there are no unusual geologic hazards on -site.
4. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial
environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat,
since there is no natural habitat nor bodies of water on the site, and the site is surrounded by
urban development.
5. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems, since the project is located within existing public facilities and
public services service area and therefbrc, all necessary public services would he available and
provided upon completion of the proposed project.
6. The design of the subdivision and the proposed/required improvements will not conflict with
casements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of the property within the
proposed subdivision, since any easements located on the site will be relocated by condition of
approval and new easements for public utilities and access would he created with the
recordation of the final map.
7. 'The discharge of waste from the proposed seven residential units into the City of -National City
sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements prescribed by the California
Regional Quality Control Board pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 13000) of
the Water Code, as specified by Government Code Section 66474.6.
8. The design of the subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural
heating and cooling opportunities in the subdivision, based on consideration of local climate,
topography, property configuration and other design and improvement requirements without
requiring reduction in allowable density or lot coverage.
3
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR
REQUESTED EXCEPTIONS FOR LOT SIZE, FRONTAGE ANI) WIDTH, AND
INCREASE DENSITY FROM SIX UNITS TO SEVEN UNITS
1. The property to be divided is of such size or shape, that it is impossible or impracticable in this
particular case to conform fully to the subdivision requirements, since the 0.71 acres parcel is of
a configuration that limits the ability to provide minimum lot widths due to the existing frontage
on Grove Street, the narrow frontage on Prospect Street requires constructing a private access,
and since the proposed development is consistent with the development pattern of the
surrounding residential lots.
2. The exceptions would not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or he
detrimental to the use of other properties in the vicinity, since the proposed subdivision
provides for access, parking, utilities, and other required amenities for the seven proposed
residential parcels within the site, as required by the Land Use Code.
3. Granting of the exceptions is in accordance with the intent and purposes of this "Title, and is
consistent with the General Plan and with all specific plans or other plans of the City, since the
General Plan and Housing Element encourage the creation of home ownership opportunities
which the requested exceptions facilitate, and since the functional design of the proposed
subdivision is compatible with adjacent and nearby development consistent with the intent of
this Title.
4. The proposed increase in density from 8.7 dwelling units per acre to 9.85 dwelling units per
acre would not have a specific adverse impact upon the surrounding community since the
neighborhood consists of a variety of housing types including multi -family development,
the proposed units are detached and reflect single-family homes, and the proposed
development is meets the design criteria of the City's design guidelines.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR REQUESTED
VARIANCES FOR FRONT YARD SETBACK FOR LOTS 1 — 4,
SiDE YARD SETBACKS FOR LOTS 2 — 4, AND
THREE STORY UNITS FOR LOTS 6 & 7
1. 'The proposed variance for reduced front yard setbacks for lots 1 -- 4 is requested due to the
steep slope along Grove Street and strict adherence to the front yard setback would result in
increased grading, wall heights, and reduced rear usable rear yards which would deprive the
property owner to develop the property in a similar manner of surrounding properties and since
adequate parking would be provided within the two -car garage for each unit, parking is
available across the street, and there is adequate driveway depth to accommodate a standard
vehicle, the requested variance•would not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties.
2. The proposed variance for reduced side yard setbacks for lots 2 — 4 is requested to provide for
detached single-family residential development consistent with the neighborhood and the R-3-
PD zoning and the project design allows for maintaining standard five foot side yard setbacks
4
on the north and south property lines to meet minimum side yard setbacks and provide adequate
distance from existing development.
3. The proposed variance for three story units on lots 6 and 7 is requested to allow for adequate
open space on each of the parcels which are restricted due to the shared private roadway to
provide access thereby reducing open space opportunities and since the three story units
would not have a substantial adverse impact on surrounding properties as overviewing would
be minimized since landscaping would be installed along the northern property line.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF APPROVAL
TO WAIVE UNDERGROUNDING FORUTILiTiES
FRONTING PROSPECT STREET NOT SERVICE THE PROJECT
1. The waiver to underground existing utilities fronting on Prospect Street would not be
detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be detrimental to the use of other
properties in the vicinity as the area is already developed, existing utility poles are prevalent in
the surrounding area, the utilities serving the development will he located underground from
Grove Street, and the removal of the pole on Prospect may result in installation of additional
poles in the area, thereby waiving the undergrounding along the property boundaries of Prospect
Street would not result in a visual degradation of utilities nor reduce the number of utility poles
in the area.
2. The waiver to underground existing utilities would not result in decreased property valuation as
there is not a comprehensive plan to underground utilities within the general area and the
undergrounding to be completed on the project site during the development would serve to
improve the property values in the area.
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL FOR
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. That the Negative Declaration, Case No. 2007-59 IS, has been prepared to address all
potential environmental impacts and considered together with any and all comments received
during the public review process and it has been determined that significant environmental
impacts would not occur upon construction of the proposed seven residences.
2. Based on the environmental analysis conducted to assess potential environmental impacts,
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment and that the Negative Declaration reflects the City's independent judgment and
analysis.
5
CASE NO. 2007-59 S, IS, Z
2121 GROVE STREET
RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR DENIAL
OF THE SEVEN LOT TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP WITH
EXCEPTION REQUESTS, VARIANCE REQUESTS, AND REQUEST TO WAIVE
UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES FRONTING PROSPECT STREET
1. "I'he proposed subdivision map would have a significant effect on the surrounding
neighborhood since the proposed seven parcels would result in a development at a density of
9.85 dwelling units per acre which is greater than the General Plan density of 8.7 dwelling
units per acre and four lots with significantly smaller than the 5,000 square foot minimum lot
size within the Residential Single-Family-3 (RS-3-PD zone) which would have the potential
to diminish the character of the neighborhood of predominantly single-family residences on
minimum 5,000 square foot parcels.
2. The proposed exceptions for reduced lot size, reduced street frontage, and reduced lot width
are excessive in allowance of exceptions and would result in an increase in allowable density
from six units to seven units within the RS-3-PD zone and the lot sizes would be inconsistent
with surrounding development that reflect parcel sizes typical of the RS-3-PD zone and the
proposed development includes three lots with 2,790 square feet each and one lot of 3,255
square feet and would not comply with the intent of the Subdivision Ordinance.
3. The property is not so unduly constrained by topography and/or configuration that would
deprive the property owner's ability to •develop the property in 'a similar, less divergent
manner from surrounding properties by adhering to the Land Use Code and that the proposed
development might affect the stability of the neighborhood and quality of life, since it would
introduce three story structures into a residential area where three story units are not
permitted and diminish privacy to adjacent residences; establish units with minimal
separation that would appear as multi -family units into a primary single-family residential
community; and create minimal area for front yard landscaping for units fronting on Grove
Street
4. The waiver to underground existing utilities fronting on Prospect Street would be detrimental to
the public health, safety, or welfare since the General Plan supports undergounding of utilities
with new development in order to increase aesthetics of surrounding areas and thereby, waiving
the requirement to underground all utilities on or fronting the property would he inconsistent
with General Plan goals.
5. The proposed subdivision map would have a significant effect on the surrounding
neighborhood since the proposed seven parcels would result in a development at a density of
9.85 dwelling units per acre which is greater than the permitted density of 8.7 dwelling units
per acre and four lots with significantly smaller than the 5,000 square foot minimum lot size
within the Residential Single-Family-3 (RS-3 zone) which would have the potential to
diminish the character of the neighborhood of predominantly single-family residences on
minimum 5,000 square foot parcels.
6
6. The proposed exceptions for reduced lot size, reduced street frontage, and reduced lot width
are excessive in allowance of exceptions and would result in an increase in allowable density
for the RS-3 zone and the lot sizes would be inconsistent with surrounding development that
reflect parcel sizes typical of the RS-3-PD zone and the proposed development includes three
lots with 2,790 square feet each and one lot of 3,255 square feet and would not comply with
the intent of the Subdivision Ordinance.
7. The property is not so unduly constrained by topography and/or configuration that would
deprive the property owner's ability to develop the property in a similar, less divergent
manner from surrounding properties by adhering to the General Plan density and Land Use
Code and that the proposed development might affect the stability of the neighborhood and
quality of life, since it would introduce three story structures into a residential area where
three story units are not permitted, establish units with minimal separation that would appear
as multi -family units into a primary single-family residential community; and create minimal
area for front yard landscaping for units fronting on Grove Street
7
CASE NO. 2007-59 S, IS, Z
2121 GROVE STREET
RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL.
General
1. This Tentative Subdivision Map authorizes the subdivision of one parcel into seven (7) lots for the
development of 7 detached single-family residences. Except as required by conditions of approval,
all plans submitted for perniits associated with the project shall conform with Exhibits dated March
16, 2009 or as approved pursuant to the action of the City Council, Case File no. 2007-59 S, IS, Z.
2. Approval of the Tentative Map expires two (2) years after adoption of the resolution of approval
at 5:00 p.m. unless prior to that date a request for a time extension not exceeding three (3) years
has been filed as provided by National City Municipal Code § 17.04.070.
Planning Division
3. Within four (4) days of final approval, pursuant to Fish and Game Code 711.4 and the California
Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 753.5, the applicant shall pay all necessary environmental
filing fees fbr the San Diego County Clerk. Checks shall be made payable to the County Clerk and
submitted to the National City Planning Division.
4. Before this Subdivision shall become effective, the applicant and the property owner both shall sign
and have notarized an Acceptance Form, provided by the Planning Division, acknowledging and
accepting all conditions imposed upon the approval of this permit. Failure to return the signed and
notarized Acceptance Form within 30 days of its receipt shall automatically terminate the
Subdivision. The applicant shall also submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that
a Notice of Restriction on Real Property is recorded with the County Recorder. The applicant shall
pay necessary recording fees to the County. The Notice of Restriction shall provide information that
conditions imposed by approval of the Subdivision are binding on all present or future interest
holders or estate holders of the property. The Notice of Restriction shall be approved as to form by
the City Attorney and signed by the Planning Director prior to recordation.
5. A detailed landscape and underground irrigation plan, including plant species, sizes, methods of
planting, street trees, etc. shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior
to the issuance of grading permits for the site. The landscape plan shall reflect the use of drought
tolerant planting and water conserving irrigation devices, as well as details for all hardscape on -site, a
5 toot high wood fence between each residence and along the northern and southern boundaries of
the project site, and dense landscaping along the northern property line to screen the proposed units
from the existing units to retain privacy.
6. To reduce the potential effects of elevated levels of ambient noise from the adjacent 1-805 freeway,
the applicant shall provide a noise study prepared by a licensed acoustic engineer to indicate
appropriate building methods and features required to reduce interior noise levels to below a 45dBA
level, as required by Section 1207.11 of the 2007 CBC, as adopted by the City of National City. This
study shall be submitted with the building plans and approved by the Building Official prior to the
issuance of any building permits for the site.
7. if the entire site cannot be served by the utilities fronting on Grove Street and service would be
provided to any or all of the units from Prospect Street, the utility service shall be installed
underground.
8. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the existing residence shall be relocated so that the structure
does not extend over proposed property lines for individual parcels or the existing structure shall be
demolished prior to Final Map Recordation. The existing storage/accessory buildings shall he
demolished prior to recordation of the Final Map unless approved by the Planning Division.
8
Building Division
9. Plans must comply with the 2007 editions of the California Building Code, the California
Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Electrical Code, California Fire
Code and California Title 24 energy and handicapped regulations.
10. Television cable companies shall be notified a minimum of 48 hours prior to filling of cable trenches.
Fire Department
11. The project shall be designed, developed and constructed in compliance with the California Fire
Code (CFC) edition in effect at time of building permit issuance, the most current National Fire
Protection Association (NFPA) Standards and City of National City Municipal Code and Ordinances
as adopted by the City of National City.
12. The property must be addressed in a manner clearly visible from the street, subject to the
satisfaction of the National City Fire Department.
13. The applicant shall maintain internal roadway access for fire apparatus in accordance with the
current California Fire Code and California Vehicle Code by providing an unobstructed width of
not less than 20 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet, 6 inches.
Where the internal access roadway width would be reduced below 20 feet due to parked vehicles,
the applicant shall post "No Parking Fire Lane" signs and/or paint the adjacent curb or pavement
(if no curb provided) red with "No Parking Fire Lane" stenciled in white letters at intervals of 25
feet, to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal and City Engineer. Furthermore, the following rules
shall apply unless an exception is granted by the Fire Marshall and/or City Engineer: 1) parking
shall be prohibited on both sides for roadway widths less than 30 feet, 2) parking shall be
prohibited on one side only for roadway widths between 30 feet and 40 feet, and 3) parking is
permitted on both sides for roadway widths greater than or equal to 40 feet.
14. The developer shall submit, to the Fire Department, a letter from Sweetwater Authority stating
existing fire flow. If determined by the Fire Marshall that additional improvements are needed,
the developer shall enter into an agreement for the water improvements with Sweetwater
Authority prior to obtaining the final map approval.
I:'.ngineering Division
15. The creation of a 20-foot wide easement for both utilities and ingress/egress for the benefit of lots
5, 6, and 7 from Prospect Street will be required. The easement shall be created on the final map.
A maintenance agreement for the road and utility easement between Lots 5 - 7 shall be prepared
and approved by the City Attorney and recorded with the Final Map.
16. Easements for drainage, utilities, and building maintenance access to lots 2, 3, and 4 with zero
side yard setbacks for the benefit of each parcel shall be provided on the final map. A
maintenance agreement for drainage, sewer, water facilities and building maintenance for lots 1
through 4 shall he prepared and approved by the City Attorney and recorded with the Final Map.
17. Easements for drainage, sewer and water, if determined necessary by the City Engineer, from and
across lots 1 -- 4 for the benefit of lots 5 - 7 shall be provided on the final map. A maintenance
agreement for drainage, sewer, and water facilities he prepared and approved by the City
Attorney and recorded with the Final Map.
18. The existing 12-foot wide Sweetwater Authority easement across the center of the property shall be
vacated by the owner, at their expense. Proof of the quitclaim or a letter from SWA stating removal
of the easement is not necessary must be submitted to the Engineering Department prior to issuance
of any grading or building permits.
19. A Ilydrology study (100 year flood) is required for the new project. The study should consider
the proposed project area to the closest municipal storm drain collection point. The study should
consider the adequacy of the existing storm drain system to convey any additional run off. All
9
Hydrology study findings and recommendations are part of Engineering Department's
requirements.
20. The Priority Project Applicability checklist for the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) is required to be completed and submitted to the Engineering Department. The
checklist will be required when a project site is submitted for review of the City Departments.
1'he checklist is available at the Engineering Department. If it is determined that the project is
subject to the "Priority Project Permanent Storm Water BMP Requirements" and the City of
National City Storm Water 13est Management Practices of the Jurisdictional Urban Runoff
Management Program (JURMP) approved Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan
(SUSMP) documentation will be required prior to issuance of an applicable engineering permit.
The SUSMP shall he prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer.
21. The Best Management Practices (BMPs) for the maintenance of the proposed construction shall
be undertaken in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
regulations which may require a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the project.
An approved SWPPP will be required prior to issuing of a construction permit.
22. All surface run-offs shall be treated with an approved Standard Urban Runoff Mitigation Plan
(SUSMP) Best Management Practice (BMP) for all Priority SUSMP projects. No runoff will be
permitted to flow over the sidewalk. Adjacent properties shall he protected from surface run-off
resulting from this development.
23. A grading and drainage plan shall he submitted showing all of the proposed and existing on -site
and off -site improvements. The plan shall be prepared in accordance with the City's standard
requirements by a Registered Civil Engineer. All necessary measures for prevention of storm
water pollution and hazardous material run-off to the public storm drain system from the
proposed parking lot or development shall be implemented with the design of the grading. This
shall include the provision of such devices as storm drain interceptors, clarifiers, or filters. Best
Management Practices for the maintenance of the parking lot, including sampling, monitoring,
and cleaning of private catch basins and storm drains, shall be undertaken in accordance with the
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) regulations. A private storm water
treatment maintenance agreement shall be signed and recorded. A checklist for preparation of the
grading plan/drainage plan is available at the Engineering Division.
24. A sewer permit shall he required. The method of sewage collection and disposal shall be shown
on the grading/drainage plan. Any new sewer lateral in the City right-of-way shall be 6 inch in
size with a clean out. A sewer stamp "S" shall be provided on the curb to mark the location of the
lateral.
25. A soils engineering report shall be submitted for the Engineering Division's review, alter
Planning Commission approval. The report shall address the stability of all of the existing and
proposed slopes on the property. It shall also address the adequacy of the building pads, the
criteria for any new retaining wall design, the maximum allowable soil bearing pressure and the
required pavement structural sections for the proposed streets, the parking areas, and the
driveways. As a minimum, the parking lot pavement sections shall he 2 inch A.C. over 4 inch
Class II aggregate base. The street pavement sections shall be in accordance with National City
modified Standard Drawing G-34. All soils report findings and recommendations shall he part of
the Engineering Division requirements.
26. A permit shall be obtained from the Engineering Department for all improvement work within the
public right-of-way, and any grading construction on private property.
27. Street improvements shall be completed in accordance with City Standards. All missing street
improvements shall be constructed. Abandoned driveway aprons shall be replaced with curb,
gutter and sidewalks.
28. A title report and grant deed shall he submitted to the Engineering Division, after the Planning
Commission approval, for review of all existing easements and the ownership at the property.
10
29. A cost estimate for all of the proposed grading, drainage, street improvements, landscaping and
retaining wall work shall be submitted with the plans. A performance bond equal to the approved
cost estimate shall be posted. Three percent (3%) of the estimated cost shall also be deposited
with the City as an initial cost for plan checking and inspection services at the time the plans are
submitted. The deposit is subject to adjustment according to actual worked hours and consultant
services.
30. The final subdivision map shall meet all of the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act, and the
City of National City Municipal Codes including certification, acknowledgement, complete
boundary information and monumentation.
31. The developer shall bond for the monumentation, the public improvements and the on -site
grading, drainage, landscaping, and other improvements through an agreement with the City prior
to the approval of the final map.
32. All utility distribution facilities within the boundaries of the subdivision, and within the half street
abutting the new subdivision, shall be placed underground, unless the City Council approves a
request to waive the undergrounding request for utilities fronting on Prospect Street that do not
serve the project. All services to the project site shall be placed underground.
33. The final map shall be recorded prior to issuance of any building permits, however, if it is
determined, based on a revised tentative subdivision map prepared by a licensed Civil Engineer
that any or all of the existing structures would extend over the newly created parcel lines, these
buildings shall be removed and/or relocated with appropriate building permits prior to recordation
of the final map.
34. All new property line survey monuments shall be set on private property, unless otherwise
approved by the Engineering Division.
11
City of National City
Planning Department
1243 National City Blvd., National City, CA 91950 (619) 336-4310
ROGER G. POST - DIRECTOR
PROPOSED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Project Title: Grove Street Homes, a proposed seven (7) lot single-family residential
Tentative Subdivision Map and Variance located at 2121 Grove Street,
National City, Case No. 2007-59 S, IS, Z
Applicant: Arnold Schmidt
3175 Cauby Street, #90
San Diego, CA 92110
Address of Project: A 0.71-acre site located between Grove Street and Prospect Street, just
north of 22nd Street, within the City of National City (APN 561-380-24).
Project Description:
The application consists of a Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide a 0.71 acre parcel into
seven Tots, exception requests for density, setbacks, and lot size and a Variance request to
allow three stories for three units within a single-family zone where two -stories are permitted
and a reduced front yard setback from twenty (20) feet to ten (10) feet for three units.
The Tentative Subdivision Map would create seven parcels that would allow construction of six
(6) detached residences and relocation of one (1) single-family residence currently on the
parcel. The project site is situated between Grove Street and Prospect Street to (he north of E.
22nd Street. The site is zoned Residential Single-Family-3 Planned Development which allows
for single -fatuity development with minimum lot sizes of 5,000 square feet and a maximum of
8.7 dwelling units per acre.
The applicant requests an exception to the allowable number of units permitted in the RS-3
zone of 8.7 dwelling units per acre. The proposed density is 9.8 dwelling units per acre with an
average parcel size of 4,418 square foot parcels. The proposed subdivision would have lot sizes
ranging from 2,790 to 7,569.
The proposed subdivision would consist of tour (4) parcels fronting on Grove Street and three
(3) parcels taking access from a private street from Prospect Street. The existing residence is
situated roughly the center of the lot at the highest elevation of 163 feet. The site slopes down
away from the house, with steep slopes and a retaining wall to the west along Grove Street, and
lesser slope down to Prospect Street to the east.
In addition to the request for an exception to the density, the applicant requests the following
additional exceptions:
1. Reduced lot size and lot frontage for the four parcels (Lots 1 - • 4) fronting on Grove
Street
2. Reduced side yard setbacks for the three parcels (Lots 2 - 4) fronting on Grove Street
from five (5) feet to zero (0) feet.
3. Frontage from a private street rather than a public street for lots 5, 6, and 7.
12
Proposed Negative Declaration
Case File No. 2007-59 S, IS, 7_
The applicant requests a Variance for the following:
4. Increased number of stories (from two stories to three) for two units proposed on lots 6
and 7.
5. Reduced front yard setback for the four parcels (Lots 1 - 4) fronting Grove Street from
twenty (20) feet to ten (10) feet.
The applicant also requests a waiver from the requirement to underground all utilities on site.
The applicant proposes to retain the existing utility pole fronting Prospect Street as it serves
residential development across Prospect Street and relocate the utilities underground at Grove
Street which will serve the site.
A Negative Declaration is a statement by the City that no additional environmental analysis is
necessary for the project because it has been determined that the project has not potential to
cause environmental impacts that would significantly effect the environment. Negative Declarations
are based upon preparation of an "initial Study" that evaluates the potential environmental impacts.
The draft Negative Declaration, Initial Study, and supporting document may be reviewed at the
Planning Division, City Hall, 1243 National City Boulevard, National City, CA 91950. The Negative
Declaration and Initial Study may be viewed the City's web site www.nationalcitycaov.
The 20-day public review and comment period for the proposed Negative Declaration shall begin
on March 16, 2009 and extend until April 6, 2009. Written comments are encouraged to be
submitted to the Planning Division at the above address.
The purpose of the review period is to allow the public to comment upon the expected
environmental impact of the project, and the adequacy of the Initial Study, and Draft Negative
Declaration. For further information, contact Peggy Chapin at 619.336-4319 or
pchapin@nationalcityca.gov.
Date: March 11, 2009 Pegin, Principal Planner
13
NIA ENVIRONMENZ
Environmental Chec
1. PROJECT TITLE/PROJECT #:
2. LEAD AGENCY:
Contact:
Phone:
3. PROJECT LOCATION:
4. PROJECT PROPONENT:
Contact:
Phone:
5. COMBINED GENERAL PLAN/
ZONING DESIGNATION:
6. ASSOCIATED APPLICATIONS:
CAIIFORNIA -e
NATIONAL el V
INCORPOR.NCD
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
Planning Division
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950
Grove Street Homes, a proposed 7 lot single-family Tentative
Subdivision Map and Variance located at 2121 Grove Street,
Case No. 2007-59 S, IS, Z
City of National City
Planning Division
1243 National City Boulevard
National City, CA 91950
Peggy Chapin, AICP, Principal Planner
(619) 336-4319
A 0.71-acre parcel situated between Grove Street and
Prospect Street, just north of E. 22nd Street, within the City of
National City (APN 561-380-24)
Arnold Schmidt
3175 Cauby Street, 1#90
San Diego, CA 92110
Luis Naranjo
(619) 224-0386
Single-family Extendible Zone, Planned Developrnent Overlay,
RS-3-PD
Tentative Subdivision Map, Case No. 2007-59 IS, S, Z
7. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The request includes an application for a Tentative Subdivision
Map to create seven (7) individual parcels, on the east side of Grove Street on a 31,000 square -foot
parcel currently improved with one single-family residence. The existing residence is situated towards
the center of the lot at an elevation of 163-feet. From the 163-foot elevation, the site slopes towards the
northwest to an elevation of 152-feet and to the east along Prospect Street to a 155-foot elevation. The
request also include a Variance to allow three story residences on two parcels, Tots 6 and 7, when only
two story units would be permitted per the Land Use Code Section 18.14.340.
14
Initial Study - Page 2 of 19
The General Plan and Zoning designation, RS-3-PD, would permit a density of 8.7 dwelling units per
acre. The applicant proposes seven (7) single family parcels with a density of 9.8 dwelling units per
acre. Four (4) parcels would front on Grove Street, each 30-feet wide by 93-feet deep with parcel sizes
ranging from 2,813 to 3,255 square feet. The parcels would be developed with four (4) detached units,
with a garage constructed within the slope as a basement and two stories of living space above the
garage. Three (3) of the units would be constructed at property line on one side and a five (5) foot
separation between the units. Each unit would have individual driveway access from Grove Street, an
approximately 35' deep back yard and balconies.
Three parcels, ranging in size from 5,221 to 7,569, would take access from Prospect Street. The existing
single-family residence would be relocated to parcel 6 with major renovations including a detached
garage with a recreation room above the garage. Units proposed on parcels 6 and 7 would be developed
with three-story residences, not exceeding the maximum height of 35-feet and attached two -car
garages.
In addition to the exception request from the density standards, the applicant requests the following
additional exceptions:
1. Reduced lot size and lot frontage for the four parcels, tots 1 - 4, fronting on Grove Street
2. Reduced side yard setbacks from five (5) feet to zero (0) feet on one side for the three parcels,
lots 2 - 4, fronting on Grove Street.
3. Frontage on a private street rather than a public street for Tots 5, 6, and 7.
The applicant requests a Variance for the following:
4. Increased number of stories (from two stories to three) for two units proposed on lots 6 and 7.
5. Reduced front yard setback for the four parcels (Lots 1 - 4) fronting Grove Street from twenty
(20) feet to ten (10) feet.
"1"The applicant also requests a waiver from the requirement to underground all utilities on site. The
applicant proposes to retain the existing utility pole fronting Prospect Street as it serves residential
development across Prospect Street and relocate only those utilities underground that would serve the
project site. Utility service to the site would be provided from Grove Street and those utilities would be
relocated underground and the pole(s) removed.
8. OTHER AGENCIES WHOSE APPROVAL MAY BE REQUIRED (AND PERMITS NEEDED): N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or is "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
1.1 Aesthetics
f7 Biological Resources
11 Geological Problems
11 Land Use / Planning
1.1 Public Services
1..1 Agriculture L .1 Air Quality
I .1 Cultural Resources L:1 Energy & Mineral Resources
11 Hazards & Hazardous Materials [ 1 Hydrology /Water Quality
L.i Noise I 1 Population / Housing
I_J Recreation L_1 Transportation/Circulation
15
Initial Study rage 3 of 19
DETERMINATION:
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this Initial Evaluation:
find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, x
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described ❑
on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ❑
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at
least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant
impact" or is "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effect that remains to be addressed.
Signature
Printed Name: Peggy Chapin, AICP
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
Date: March 11, 2009
Title_ Princpal Planner
0
A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show
that the impact simply does not apply to the project. A "No Impact" answer should be explained
where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards.
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved. Answers should address off -site as well
as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as
operational impacts.
Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than ,i..;'.':';1t with
mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriat : ii :-:ore is
substantial evidence than an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially
Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. `Negative Declaration: Less than Significant wl Mitigation Incorporated" applied where the
incorporation of a mitigation measure has reduced an effect from "Potentially Signific �,zt Impact" to
"Less then Significant Impact"_ The lead agency must describe the mitigation measure,., ;)rid briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a Tess than significant level.
Nero
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other C _(;. process,
an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declare:..:: -a Section
15063(c)(3)(D).
16
Initial Study - rage 4 of 19
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). References to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
This in only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whichever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to Tess than significance.
Nor..
ISSUES with Supporting Documentation & Sources
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
(Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4)
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality
of the site and its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime Views in the area?
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significan Significant w/ Significan Impact
( Impact Mitigation t Impact
Incorporation
11 Ll x
1 1:1 Cl x
i__l 11 _l x
1 1 x
There are no designated scenic vistas nearby or across the proposed project site. As such, no vistas
would be adversely impacted by the proposed project. The existing residence on the site does enjoy
scenic views to the west toward the ocean, as it is situated approximately 12' above Grove Street and
the adjacent 1-805 freeway, which ensures no development will be built to the west and block views
from the site. Prospect Street is situated approximately 8'-10' lower in elevation and no views are
available from properties to the east across the Site toward the ocean. In addition, the City does not
have a policy to protect private viewsheds.
The site is located within an urbanized area and surrounded by one and two story single-family
residences and apartments. Lots 1 - 4 would take access from Grove Street and would face the 805
freeway to the west. Lots 5, 6, and 7 would take access from a private roadway off of Prospect Street.
The proposed elevations for tots 5, 6, and 7 would be between 160' and 163'.
Adjacent uses include two single-family residences and a 4-unit apartment building to the north, and
17
Initial Study - Page , of 19
two single-family residences and a vacant parcel to the south. The two parcels proposed along the
northern boundary of the project, Lots 6 and 7 are arranged similarly to the three existing Tots
immediately adjacent to the north. Three-story homes, not exceeding 35', would be constructed on
Tots 6 and 7. The existing two-story residence would be relocated and renovated to lot 5. A detached
two -car garage and recreation room above the garage would be constructed for lot 5.
South of the property line, there are two existing single -story residences and a vacant parcel. One
residence fronts Prospect Street and the other is situated in the middle of the block fronting E. 22nd
Street. The vacant parcel fronts on Grove Street. The residence fronting E. 22nd Street is situated over
35' from the southern property line. The residence fronting Prospect Street is located five (5) feet from
the property line. The existing residence would be relocated to lot 5, approximately 20-feet to the
southern property line.
Two single-family homes and a two-story apartment building are adjacent to the northern property
line. One of the residences fronts Grove Street and is situated only 3'-4' from the northern property
line and approximately 10' from the street. Its 2-story design and orientation toward the street would
be similar to the proposed residences fronting Grove Street (lots 1 - 4) which would have ten (10) foot
front yard setbacks.
The other existing single-family home north of the project site is in the middle of the block and would
be adjacent to lot 6. The proposed three-story home on lot 6 would be located five (5) feet from the
northern property line, however, the residence to the north is 25-feet from the property line. The
existing residence adjacent to lot 7 is located approximately five (5) feet from the northern property
line and while the proposed three-story unit on lot 7 would meet the minimum side yard setback of five
(5) feet, there would be landscaping installed reduce the potential for overviewing into the rear yards
of the adjacent residence.
The proposed subdivision includes six (6) new single-family homes with vaned building materials and
architectural elements, as well as the standard associated improvements and landscaping. In addition,
the existing home will be relocated and remodeled to include additional square footage and an
exterior color pallet and materials comparable to the new homes. Development of the site would
upgrade the aesthetics of the area by reducing the appearance of a vacant lot and providing
landscaping and street trees where there is currently minimal landscaping. (Sources: 1, 2, 3, 4)
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES -- Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant Incorporation
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural
t.and Evaluation & Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing
impacts on agriculture and farmland.
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of i l Li x
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a I I (1 x
Williamson Act contract?
18
Initial Study - Page 6 of l9
*4411101
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, t7 Ll t ] x
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland, to non-agricultural use?
National City is a built -out community and there is no farmland mapped or planned to be mapped within
the City, or more specifically on the project site. The site is also currently zoned for residential uses, and
no Williamson Act contract is associated with the land; therefore, the development would have no
impact on agricultural zoned areas. (Sources: 1, 4)
1I1. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air
quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to
make the following determinations.
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wl Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable i 1
air quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially I i 1 I I x
to an existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any I I
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number f 1 1 i 1
of people?
The County of San Diego is in attainment for all California Clean Air Act (CCAA) pollutants with the
exception of ozone. The proposed project includes the development of seven (7) single-family
structures on property currently improved with one residence and does not include any design
components that would obstruct the Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) for San Diego County. Also,
the project includes aspects which could reduce pollutant discharge, including appropriately designed
landscaping and on -site drainage.
Implementation of the project would result in an increase of approximately 84 average daily vehicle
trips (ADTs)_ Emissions resulting from developing the site would be directly related to the amount of
vehicular traffic generated by the facility. A generation of 84 ADT would be considered "low volume"
traffic. Consequently, while the proposed project would have an incremental impact to area -wide air -
quality, the individual impacts attributed to this project are immeasurably small on a regional scale and
will not cause ambient air -quality standards to be exceeded or have a significant impact on air quality.
As the project site slopes down to Grove Street on the west side, the proposal will require grading;
however, any impacts from construction equipment and operations would be minimal and temporary in
nature and the project applicant would be required to implement dust control measures. While dust from
grading and other site preparation would generate particulate matter emission, due to the small amount
19
Initial Study - l'agc 7 of 19
of grading, and with appropriate use of Best Management Practices (BMP) for site clearance and
grading, the project would not generate significant particulate matter or dust and would therefore not
result in a significant impact. (Sources: 4, 8, 9, 14) r/r'
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wl Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through i:l 11 1 x
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDBG) or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, and regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) or US Fish and
Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d) interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
i.l
II x
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat 1 i.1 I.1 x
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan,
or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation plan?
The project site is located completely within an urbanized area, surrounded by development and
bordered by the 1-805 freeway. The site contains no sensitive habitats or biological resources that are
protected by local policies or ordinances. There are also no adopted habitat conservation plans known
that include the proposed project site. Based on a physical inspection of the property, the site is
improved with a two-story, single-family residence and the site contains native soil, grass and some
smaller ornamental shrubs and trees around the site perimeter. There are no jurisdictional wetlands,
other sensitive habitat, or sensitive species detected on the property; and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
maps indicate that there are no jurisdictional wetlands or jurisdictional waters of U.S. or state -defined
streambeds on site. There are no anticipated impacts to biological resources.
(Sources: 1, 4, 5, 11)
Noro
20
Initial Study - Page 8 of 19
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wi Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of I 1 :1 1.1 x
a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of l ► 1.1 x
an archaeological resource pursuant to 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological I I (1 1 x
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred l-1 11
outside of formal cemeteries?
Historic structures that are considered noteworthy and have contributed significantly to the
development of the City, are contained on the City's adopted Historic Sites List. Additional structures
may be added to the Historic Sites List upon request. The request must include a historical analysis
prepared by a historian recognized by the State of California_ Determination to place a structure on the
list requires City Council approval. Demolition of any structure listed on the Historic Sites List also
requires City Council approval.
The site contains an existing residence constructed in approximately 1930 but extensive remodeling
has occurred over time. The applicant proposes to relocate and renovate the existing home to lot 5.
The structure is not listed on Historic Sites List but is listed on a separate survey prepared in 1994 for
the National City Historical Society by a historian, Anne Pierce Cooper. The 1994 survey identifies the
architectural style as Spanish Eclectic characterized by stucco, flat roof, and tile accents. The survey
numerically ranks each property as follows.
1 - indicates a National Register potential,
2 - indicates local significance,
2.5 - indicates potential local significance and a "better than average 3",
3 - indicates inclusion in the survey due to recognized age from stylistic elements, and
4 - indicates inclusion in the survey for the same reasons as "3" though stylistically very altered.
The structure on site was ranked as a 3. However, since the time of the survey, the structure was
significantly and stylistically altered. A two-story room addition was constructed in 1997. The addition
includes 2 bedrooms, 1 bath, and laundry room on the first floor and a bedroom, 2 bath, den, and
balcony on the second floor. The original wood -framed windows were replaced with aluminum sliding
windows. Due to these significant structural changes to the exterior of the historic structure, it would no
longer qualify as a 3 ranking but would likely be listed as a 4 ranking, by the standards indicated in the
survey.
CEQA, Section 15064.5, provides for a public agency to determine the significance of impacts on
historical resources. A structure is considered a historic resource if it is "listed in, or determined to be
eligible by the State t listorical Resources Commission, for listing in the California Register of Historical
Resources" or "included in a local register of historical resources" or "identified as significant in an
21
Initial Study - Page 9 of 19
historical resource survey meeting the requirements section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code."
Public agencies must treat any such resource as significant unless the preponderance of evidence
demonstrates that it is not historically or culturally significant.
Section 5024.1(g) of the Public Resources Code provides criteria for evaluating the significance of a
potential resource. The resource would be considered historically significant if the resource is:
A. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of
California's history and cultural heritage;
B. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past;
C. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or
represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or
D. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.
Development of the project would require relocation and renovation of the existing structure. Since the
structure has not been included on the adopted Historic Sites List; it has been significantly altered; the
prior survey did not identify the structure as being significant; and it does not meet the criteria for
determining significance of an historic resource pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5020.1
(CEQA 15064.5), the proposed modifications of the structure would not result in a significant impact.
No archaeological resources as defined in Section 15064.5 are known to exist on the proposed project
site and there are no recorded archaeological sites nearby. Additionally, the developed nature of the
area, as a residential lot with the surrounding multi- and single-family residential properties suggest
impacts to archaeological resources are not anticipated.
No cultural resource constraints are known to exist on the currently developed project site. As such,
there is a relatively low probability of disturbing any human remains and therefore, no significant impact.
In the event of the accidental discovery or recognition of any human remains during construction, the
applicant shall take all appropriate steps as required by relevant federal, state, and local laws. The
proposed project would not result in a significant impact to cultural resources. (Sources: 1, 4, 7)
VI. GEOLOGY & SOILS
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wl Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii) Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction?
iv) Landslides? 1 x
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? ! ! l l x
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
22
Initial Study - Page 10 of 19
would become unstable as a result of the project, and I I CI II x
potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks r1 fl I 1
to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of 11 i-I i I x
septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste
water?
California Geological Survey information indicates the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Special
Studies Zone, and there are no known active or potentially active faults that intercept the protect site;
therefore, the potential for ground rupture at this site is considered low_ Accordingly, the site is not
considered to possess a significantly greater seismic risk than that of the surrounding area in general.
In addition, the proposed structures shall be designed in accordance with California Building Code
guidelines and/or those adopted by the City of National City.
It should be recognized that Southern California is an area that is subject to some degree of seismic
risk and that it is generally not considered economically feasible nor technologically practical to build
structures that are totally resistant to earthquake -related hazards. Construction in accordance with the
minimum requirements of the Uniform Building Code should minimize damage due to seismic events.
The project will also be designed to achieve adequate stability through appropriate grading standards
and soil testing.
The project site is currently developed with one single family structure and small accessory buildings.
Proposed plans include landscaping for all areas not developed with driveways, private roadway, and
structures. The drainage will be designed to drain on -site and not increase erosion; therefore, there are
no impacts anticipated
The proposed project site would incorporate traditional sewer laterals, which will connect with the
existing sewer system that serves the City, therefore there would be no impact to groundwater.
(Sources: 2, 4, 10)
VII. HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
Nkomo, c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
1:1
I
23
Initial Study - rage 1 1 of 19
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous I.1
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, 1 t 1 11 x
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would 1 1 f 1
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an ri I 1 1 x
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 1 1
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
The proposed project area is within an urbanized area that is not identified as a hazardous material site
and there are no hazardous materials associated with the proposed single-family residential use of the
site. Also, the site is not located within two miles of a public or private airport or associated airport plan,
therefore would not be an impact. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 6)
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant w! Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere 1.1
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site?
24
Initial Study - Page 12 of 19
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site I 1 i 1 11 x
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding
on- or off -site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
Il
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 1 I
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as i l I I
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which 1 i 1 1-I x
would impede or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 1 1 l CI x
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
:1 x
The proposed hilltop project site has no streams or rivers on or near the site. Consistent with City
development standards and State requirements for National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES, a Standard Urban Stormwater Mitigation Plan (SUSMP) and a Stormwater Pollutant
Prevention Study (SWPP) would be prepared prior to grading to address drainage and runoff.
Implementation of these permits would effectively result in controlled drainage and water quality
discharge. Therefore, no adverse effect on water quality or the natural drainage pattern of the site is
expected. Development of the project will not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff
and create flooding, nor will it create substantial erosion or siltation, since the required NPDES permits
will address these items. Also, the site is located in an urbanized developed area and would include
appropriate construction and permanent BMPs.
The area is not within a failure area of a levee or dam; therefore, there would be no exposure of people
or structures to any significant risks. The site is located also outside the boundaries of both the 100-year
and 500-year flood zones and is several miles inland from the San Diego Bay and therefore; there is no
impact (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 6, 14)
IX. LAND USE & PLANNING
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Physically divide an established community? 1 f-1 1.1 x
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
x
25
Initial Study - Page 13 of 19
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
The proposed project site is currently improved with a single-family residential structure surrounded by Ng
other residential development, both single-family residences and small multi -family development to the
north, east, and south. 1-805 freeway borders the Grove Street to the west.
The existing General Plan/Zoning designation of Single-family Residential Extendible (RS-3-PD) allows
for residential development up to a density of 8.7 dwelling units (du) per acre, or 6-residental lots on this
parcel. Since the proposed development would result in seven Tots, one for the existing residence and
six lots for new single-family residential development, resulting in a density of 9.8 du/acre.
While various exterior color schemes are proposed for the new residences, the primary construction
materials include a cement plaster finish, stone and wood accents, and clay roof tiles, with decorative
wrought iron, awning, and shutter accents. The existing residence would be remodeled and enlarged
and would include a detached garage with a second story recreation room_
Surrounding residential development reflects an average lot size of 7,695 s.f. for the block exceeding
the 5,000 square foot minimum parcel size. This mixture of single- and multi -family parcels results in a
density of approximately eight (8) du/acre for the surrounding area. Should the remaining vacant
parcels develop, the density would result in approximately 8.9 du/acre. The proposed development
would be constructed at a slightly higher density of 9.8 du/acre. Overall, the build -out of the area would
be somewhat higher than the General Plan density of 8.7 du/ac.
The proposed development would be consistent with the Housing Element goals of the General Plan to
provide in -fill development and retain the single-family residential character of the neighborhood.. The
site development as proposed would not result in a significant impact. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13)
X. MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Result in the Toss of availability of a known mineral i 1 11 I x
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important I i i i-1 x
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
Discussion: There are no known mineral resources on the proposed project site or delineated on a local
plan for the site; therefore, there is no impact_ (Sources: 1, 2, 4)
Xl. NOISE
Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
26
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
41100
Initial Study - f'age 14 of 19
groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? ❑ 0 I 1 x
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in I I 11 f7 x
' ' the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 11
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, I 1 i I i 1 x
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would L1 i 1 11 x
the project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
While the proposed project area is in an developed residential area, it also falls within an area of the
National City General Plan Noise Contour Map subject to elevated levels of ambient noise due to the
adjacent 1-805 freeway. As a result, interior noise volumes of each new residence would exceed
acceptable limits as defined by the Municipal Code, Title 12. Reduced interior noise levels may be
achieved by incorporating design features such as increased insulation, both in the walls and attic, and
automatic ventilation systems. Consistent with City standards and 2007 California Building Code,
Section 1207.11, a noise study, prepared by a licensed acoustic engineer, would be required prior to the
issuance of building permits to ensure measures are incorporated in the building plans to reduce interior
noise levels to below a 45 dBA level. Reducing exterior noise levels of the rear yards may be achieved
by buffering freeway noise. This can be achieved by the proposed structures fronting Grove Street that
shield the rear yards of lots 1-4. Therefore there is no significant impact to new residents, since noise
attenuation measures can be incorporated through design measures utilized during construction.
It is not anticipated that development of seven single-family residential parcels would result in an
increase of noise levels in excess of local standards that would affect neighboring properties.
The associated grading and construction on the project site would create temporary noise impacts.
Construction activities would be limited to those hours defined in Section 12.10.160 of the City's
Municipal Code. No significant impact from the project would occur.
The proposed project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public
use airport or private airstrip; therefore, there would be no impact to future residents due to aircraft
noise. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 6, 14, 15)
XII. POPULATION & HOUSING
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wt Signirican Impact
Impact Mitigation t Impact
Incorporation
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either f 1 [1 1 x
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
27
Initial Study - Page 15 of 19
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, I 1I II x
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the 1.1 ! 1 1.1 x
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
The proposed project is a seven (7) unit residential housing development, at a density of approximately
9.8 dwelling units per acre. Based on the City's 2005-2010 Housing Element, the expected population of
the development would be 25 persons (3.38 persons per household). This increase would not be
considered significant, since the General Plan density of 8.7 dulac would result in 20 persons.
Additionally, the proposed development would be served by existing roadways and infrastructure. In
addition, the proposed development would be consistent with goals of the Housing Element of the
General Plan to provide in -fill development.
The proposed project would not displace any existing residents as the existing unit would be retained on
site. No irnpacts are expected from the increased density of the project. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 13)
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wl Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Police protection? .1 1 1 L 1 x
Schools? 1I
Parks? 1 I I l x
Other public facilities? 1 I I l x
The proposed project would not result in adverse impacts to public services. The project site is
currently and will continue to be served by the National City Fire and Police Department. The closest
Fire Department is 4 blocks away at Euclid Avenue and 241h Street. The development will generate
impact fees specifically slated for public services and increased revenue from increased property taxes
that will supplement additional services provided to the proposed development. Therefore, there is no
significant impact.
The proposed project would result in no impacts to City schools or parks, as the proposed 7-unit
residential project would be expected to result in a negligible additional of school children or population
in the area since one unit is existing so the resulting increase in residential is six households. The site
would be served by Lincoln Acres Elementary School and Granger Junior High School. Both schools
have not indicated any existing or planned overcrowding conditions. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 14)
28
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Initial Study - Page 16 of 19
XIV. RECREATION
Significant Significant w/ Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Would the project increase the use of existing ;1 [ I I. I x
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the I rl
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
The proposed project includes the construction of six (6) single-family residential structures and
relocation of an existing residence on individual Tots, each with private, fenced yards. Each parcel would
provide sufficient private open space for use by the individual households to meet City requirements,
since the rear yards exceed the minimum depth of 20 feet. Approximately 8 blocks away and within
walking distance, the project residents can utilize Las Palmas Park, which offers organized sports
activities, swimming, and open recreation,. As such, the proposed residential use of the project site
would not substantially increase the use of local recreational facilities, necessitate construction of
additional recreational facilities, or remove or impact existing facilities in the surrounding area; therefore,
there is no impact. (Sources: 1, 2, 4)
XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wl Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation I 1 1-1 [J x
to the existing traffic Toad and capacity of the street system
(i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service ) LI
standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an I I i I
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature 1.1 x
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? l 1 [J x
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? I 1 !J x
g) Conflict with adopted policies plans, or programs supporting 1_1 i J x
`.►. alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)?
29
Initial Study - Page 17 of 19
According to a review of the potential circulation and traffic impacts by the City of National City s Traffic
Engineer, the proposed project would not cause a significant increase in traffic. While the addition of
homes to a currently undeveloped site would result in an increase of approximately 84 average daily trips Nimi
(ADTS). With such a low anticipated increase in ADTs, a traffic study is not warranted. Surrounding
roadway segments would be expected to continue to operate under capacity and the existing roadways
will adequately serve the project.
Project plans include development of multiple driveways on the site; four individual driveways from Grove
Street and one shared private roadway for the other three parcels extending from Prospect Street. The
private roadway also includes individual driveways to the proposed three units on lots 5, 6, and 7, as well
as fire access and turnaround space for private vehicles. Each of the proposed seven residences would
be provided with a two -car garage. The new private roadway would be designed in accordance with
private road standards acceptable to the City Engineering and Fire Departments. In addition, the parking
spaces proposed on -site accommodate each of the proposed seven (7) residences, per the City Land
Use Code Section 18.58, which requires 2-3 spaces per lot depending on the size of the home.
The reduced front yard set backs from Tots 1, 2, 3 & 4 would result in reduced driveway lengths. CC&Rs
would be required to address maintenance of the shared private roadway and would restrict the
homeowners for units located on lots1 — 4 to utilize the garages for parking. Since there are no units on
the west side of Grove Street, there is ample street parking available to those units. Therefore, there
would be no impact.
The proposed project does not contain any components that would result in a change in air traffic
patterns; therefore, there is no impact. As a single-family development, the proposed project would also
not conflict with any adopted policies, plans or programs supporting alternative transportation and
therefore, there is no impact. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 14)
XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the project:
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant w! Significan Impact
impact Mitigation t Impact
Incorporation
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the I 1 I
applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new stone water i-i i I I x
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
(1
i1 x
30
Initial Study - Page 18 of 19
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to I-1
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
"ilisr*g) Comply with federal, state, and Ioca1 statutes and I J
regulations related to solid waste?
n
The proposed subdivision is located on an improved property located within an urbanized area with
existing utility services, including water and wastewater facilities. Comments received from City staff
and Sweetwater Authority indicates that capacity exists to handle the needs of the proposed homes,
however, additional upgrades to the water system may be necessary prior to building permit issuance.
Therefore, the project would have no significant impact. Also, new construction would be designed and
constructed to include best management practices (BMPs) to appropriately handle wastewater and not
exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board:
therefore, there is no impact.
The proposed project site would be served by EDCO, the local waste collection and recycle company.
Also, the proposed project would comply with all federal, state, and local statues and regulations related
to solid waste. (Sources: 1, 2, 4, 14)
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS of SIGNIFICANCE
Potentially Less Than Less Than No
Significant Significant wf Significant Impact
Impact Mitigation Impact
Incorporation
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of I 1 I 1 1 x
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
`' " below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause I i-1 I 1 x
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly
or indirectly?
No significant impacts to the environment as a result of this project have been identified. Approval of the
project is not expected to have any significant impacts, either long-term or short-term, nor will it cause
substantial adverse effect on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
31
Initial Study - rage 19 of 19
REFERENCE SOURCES:
Reference
1
Document Title
National City General Plan and Land Use Code
2 City of National City Municipal Code
3 City of National City Design Guidelines
4 Grove Street Subdivision Project Plans (2007-59 S, IS)
5 US Fish and Wildlife Wetland Mapped System
(http://wetlandsfws_er.usgs.gov/wtlnds/launch_html)
6 FEMA Map Service Center
7 Historic Properties Survey for the City of National City,
prepared by Anne Pierce Cooper, Historical
Researcher, dated December 1994
8 2004 Triennial Revision of the Regional Air Quality
Strategy for San Diego County, July 2004
9 Air Quality in San Diego County, Air Pollution Control
District for San Diego County, 2006
10 California Department of Conservation, California
Geologic Survey (CGS) website
11 Environmental Assessment Form for project
12 Co. of San Diego Department of Environmental Health
website www.sdcounty.ca.gov/deh/
13 National City 2005-2010 Housing Element, December
2007
14 Comments from National City Fire, Building, &
Engineering Departments and Sweetwater Authority
15 2007 California Building Code, Title 24 Part 2
Available for Review at:
National City Planning
Division and
www.nationalcityca.gov
National'City Planning
Division.
National City Planning Div. or
www. na tiona lci tyca. qov..
National City Planning Div..
http://wetlandstws.er.usgs.go
v/wtInds/launch.html
(www.fema.gov)
National City Planning Div..
National City Planning Div._
National City Planning Div..
http://www.conservation.ca.qo
v/cqs/Paqes/Index.aspx
National City Planning
Division or
www.nationalcityca.gov
www.sdcounty.ca_gov/deh/
National City Planning Div. or
www.nationalcityca.gov.
National City Planning Div.
www.nationalcityca.gov_
National City Building Dept_
32
i /
' , ,
/ /,/
/,
, I ,/,„ ../.•:
•
'''•,/,..
,
i6
f,x .,;
,
• i 1
m
444
1„...4.:1, z
F.A1,,1 •
tg•
÷*4;\
5 6.
Ac
4.••••*0
41:1,W
ic
I us
1 •
•tei
:1 26.
Coro
k
r
.•
3 ConiIllever
II I •
; '•
. •
,‘ • ,
\ • it')
— •'1" ,
\ I
%/
\\!/
- t
r.
-Story r
Towhouse
g-41LM
964;sp
!Unit
. . .
-TOW-rifioue
‘,7.•
30.30'' 33.19'
1
SD A \I L.
• • r •(
• ,
-
I
RECEN
-,MAY 2 7 2009
• a•.r.)1\,,,Istar‘i\
•
Ratigria1JCity Planning Division
( NatizinakCity, CA,.,91959.
• C i./
,f 5
, \ (1
_7;1'
• I r'i
• ,
E
N 71'20'58"E 295.46'
-1-
..,,, 83.63" '
...,...L., •10-110.01.04.1 P momottoa 44•Tio-f4Ist Abe. mop tr qf :m.o. t!..4,474..4).114m=4.40,444.).4...4A-44.1440:4.4.0.4.414414.44.11:4.141,,0,11
, b -,,,,,,••• I • 115.83 vs `•-• _ I r-,•„
L,
- I1J.411
.P .
' '-,•1•,..:•••z'ut
"..Garage
I I 11111 11
Ca
?At
96 0
4
Unit 31
2904 SO. FT. I
2-Story
Townhouse
Cal
Un it.
3066, SQ.
Akira
1167
96. Q
: • . .;
• , . 2-Story
/00CC0 L1 Tawnhouse,,
; ---...i.-1-111.--,11111111(
< •
g (o In • c/
o sin
.44 10.1.
• lo i ' •
II •ii
= ais
/
(.4
cL _ :0
_ _
is)
V I
3120'
Unit 6
3-tStcryi otTtage 14.0 41:46“-•-
r-5783-S.Q. FT.
,s,r_Garage
Unit 5
6174 SO. F.T.
• Existing 2-Story
E. Residence
,t1: 11'1 •••
1, 1•••
6.21'
Unit 7
7317 SO. FT.
31-StOry Cotiage
• Gatge
(-I
ROAD NO -
r- .., •
\ i. • Existir :.:
,
“:11 e f:,,i
r 0\ 12
\
cr,I
-.A.1 co ."
1 1
1 '::t. • ::-• 'y
is•KA• ;r••:.;
Garage "i). .ri.
:1.4-‘o \
111.7------A
..1•11.! '..,.,::."4.__...:\._ 1 '::\ •
• N .
X i
• s 1
, . .0. • II): •••••,11m. ii .0 IL a es II•11 4•4,1..11,4.111.e. .....tri tt.444.r....,444_,I. 01. pott. a • a.m.* .... arms •o. 1, t- ,t, V A
.1...
_ '',A I", 0 - s /7....1,221:':58'r7::::i-6:5;40'.::27.---‘<-1.--''''',-4"-:'-'7:,7,--24'"' ''',.,:lk''2:%'''::-.'74-:---%•-''''.:::.%:,4,---• .• .
• ,/,:',44.:'''W • . :::.,4,;‘,/ .• • ins, -. ,•-s'Ai:::_, ,- \A"•,' /' ---`-'Az-----'''''''---- - - A . ---A!-i-A,r--A-'-:A, 1'.\ As A, 1 st. ;
1,... '.,'`'••-'-'-',,17-,A'cl"..," "-:: --,*'.\:::- -"-/ •,.,/ --" \ • '-i'
11 1-\i ,
;-..:.1 i.;' L.
t e ;.!1•;.!- !
/•--, ,
0' 5' 10' 20' 30'
Graphic Scole
111CePtUal-Site_ Plan
1 roCie
Nationtal City, California
Data : 5/27/09
;3Scale
•-'•,•/.:!., I
i
j.a
••1
-°'°' • /.1-• •
r.•
6.'„ 1.1
,„j;
3 0,
Gz
•
GARAGE
MI HIS Nill
-..11jj HMI
F.F. 162.0
PAD 161.5
F.F._.161.5
PAD 161.0
00
LOT 4
3096. 50. FT.
F.F. 161.0
PAD 160.5
0
a
(0 .. 23
0
N
or. wr
cars
.0 porn
— r/61Cg
6559'CI
16/0 •0N1
4..c012' C.g.
CR. 60.5 1 1
E. 167.9 1
C, p
�6r i I N
P .5 1 ,J
12'
OR 160.0 , 9•
I.E� t57.3U " /4•
efs�Ce
160. B6,
N7120'58'E
Turf Block
99 rli---T—Fitr_T--7
LOT 5
017* SO. FT.
F.F. 163.5
PAD 163.0
46'-6' P•Y.C.-0
S 7121'56'1#--i'=1.95:40
•
IF1 �sw.
rss9 a• G'9 2- '
16i.5 PROPOSED
FENCE
24 .SWAGE
® 0.5% MIN.
S71'21'3 "
APPROx. LOC. OF
12' WATER. EASE.
TO BE vACATED
GROVE STREET TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP 2007-59 S
I I •
. „ I r•-
•
. ,
• :•cr,;;A:..-e • I • 41
/re 1. 7, IOU% , LINO ;
1 „
., , .• l . : t.' r: : .1 • . ",
. ?.., ..; .).-': .-:-. . • ..-. .• .,-. -
;: . ••I I 1
.I) Il,II' 1 ---.r,—
• ,S •
',- ir .: . I I I ' •:. 'ci5',--,'
. . • i. --4.* •,_.)
: , , ;; !, 1,..:•.•• c. •
.1.;,•*,: c ':
: • -.-54..
. ti.. :, •
E E E
ARE
, 1
! 1 :+ [. ---
,', , • pt,•1--....H 1 :i
1
,-r-
.... _...._..
r7"-‘:.11-11.11 y-11416'1
•_...,
_,..-7---
.:r•
k. I-
. L ,
...t:,_:: ._-,-- - - •
.1.... - 7• ,
r.,:.• ' ''''?.,;" ',.. .:!: ,' 1
•-E.4 / i :.!,1 ;
li•
.1 .
-0..r
•••...4 •
r
.,1
; •
• - 0
SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS
. ........... '
C. .0.,
,011 .• • :41 L
5' HT. Wood 'Fence
5' HT. Wood Fence
Conceptual Landscape Plan
2121 Grove Street
National City, California
Date : 5/27/09
c
400. v 444,4P
• -41.11r.:.
latbrdt - "air %fig.
—7-
2121 Grove Street
MO
I�
1`iiii111
o
!!!IIII
•
r
1ST FLOOR
GARAGE
CONCEPTUAL WEST ELEVATION- 2 STORY TOWNHOUSE
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
SCALE:
4'
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
l l l
GARAGE
CONCEPTUAL SOUTH ELEVATION- 2 STORY TOWNHOUSE
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
SCALE:
0' 4' 6
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
imalirompm
-•111-- OD OD
2ND FLOOR
L
1ST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL NORTH ELEVATION- 2 STORY TOWNHOUSE
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
SCALE:
0' 4' 6
GARAGE
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
l l l
0
■
•
2ND FLOOR
0.-0"+
1ST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL EAST ELEVATION- 2 STORY TOWNHOUSE
SCALE:
6'
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
24'-0"
20'-9%2"
I I '-8"
33'x 2'
TRASH
33'x 2"
RECYCLE
33'x2i"
LAWN
TRIMMINGS
7
-CAR GARAGE
23'-4" x 24'-0"
559 SQ. FT.
UF'
CONCEPTUAL BASEMENT PLAN
TOWN 10U5E SCALE: 3/0"= I '-0"
—
L
SQUARE FOOTAGE
I st Floor: 1139.67 SQ. FT.
2nd Floor: 999.54 SQ. FT.
Total: 2I39.2 I SQ. FT.
l
PATIO
x 4'-0'
DINING ROOM
x7'-10"
op
LIVING ROOM
0-6" x 15 -9'
KITCHEN
AEF.
r
—t==
FOYER
7-2" x
CONCEPTUAL FIRST FLOOR
TOWNrOUSE SCALE:/, 1'-0"
61)
TH
BEDROOM
2 - 10' x 10'-6'
FAMILY ROOM
I 8'-5' x 1 2'-6"
SQUARE FOOTAGE
I St P1oor: I 139.67 5Q. FT.
2nd Floor: 999.54 5Q. FT.
Total: 2 139.2 50. FT.
ol�
1
/0011.
MASTER BATH
13'-3" x 7'-6"
Q
MASTER BEDROOM
15'-6" x 13'-6"
T
R$5
MASTER
CLOSET
6'-9" x 7'-6"
R$S
TH
CONCEPTUAL SECOND FLOOR
TOWNh0U5E SCALE: 3/G"= I'-0"
DOWN
S CK
W/
—L
LINEN
CABINET
OPEN TO
FOYER BELOW
7'-
BEDROOM
12'- 10" x 10'- 10"
81
BEDROOM
i 5'- 10" x 12'-2"
SQUARE FOOTAGE
I st Floor: 1 i 39.67 5Q. FT.
2nol Floor: 999.54 5Q. FT.
Total: 2 139.21 5Q. FT.
l
Niter
ROOF PLATE
GARAGE FLOOR
41t-6M
FRONT ELEVATION- COTTAGE UNIT C
WALL:
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOORS: OIL STAINED
FRONT DOOR: OIL STAINED
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
SPECIAL FEATURES: EXTERIOR PLANTER
BOXES
STAINED WOOD HEADERS
AND SHUTTERS
GROVE STREET
National City, 45 California
RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION- COTTAGE''°'.4
SALE: UNIT
e� 2•
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
SIDEDOOR: METAL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
GROVE STREET
National City, California
ROOF PLATE
27'-0"
19'-0"
2ND FLOOR
10'-0"
1ST FLOOR
0'-0"
LEFT SIDE ELEVATION- COTTAGE UNIT NIT C
3Numi
0' 2' 4' 6'
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
GROVE
STREET
4
National City, California
J
447*
440*
08‘6006s%
/
3
Q
'L'>•
0
1
I[
MASTER BEDROOM
16'-2" x
MAST
8'-
R$S
MASTER
CLOSET
6'-0" x 8'- 10"
BATH
10'-6"
R$S
COAT
CLOSET
DESK
BEDROOM
10'-3" x 10'-9"
SKYLIGHT
BEDROOM
10'-3" x 10'-9"
u
CONCEPTUAL SECOND FLOOR
3-STORY COTTAGE SCALE: 3/6"=
SQUARE
FOOTAGE
First Floor:
Second Floor:
Th rd Floor:
Total:
608.78 SQ. FT.
999. i 1 SQ. FT.
G23. I I SQ. FT
223 SQ.
Ln
DEN
19'-7' x 22'-3"
ShELVING
CONCEPTUAL THIRD FLOOR
3-STORY COTTAGE SCALE: 3/, I '-0"
OFFICE
10-3" x 13'-3"
--� OPTIONAL DESK---
MIMI
SQUARE FOOTAGE
First Floor: 608.78 SQ. FT.
Second Floor: 999. ; I SQ. FT,
Third Floor: 623. I I SQ. FT
Total: 223 i 5Q. FT.
...........;. r.,. ,...�
...... •a;............,...,.,.t.;,.�
i:....'.... ...:. MIA ... •..:..........�
MIN 4=11.
•
�l
NI
9'-0"
2ND FLOOR
0'-0"
AL
1ST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL NORTH ELEVATION- EXISTING RELOCATED COTTAGE UNIT
SCALE:
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
l
10101
OEM
MA \ �\
I ■,A.A.A A*,■i• SA AA�\
IiA AiA�A A,II A,A.A AiA A A ■ A.• A,A,A�A �. t
II. 11,A.Ai• A�A.AA MA AMA AA.A'A A,A A.AI.A A • ■�S •�\\
IAAA MAMA AMMAMA A,•■,A,A,A.AA A,■ A■■,A A.A.A:A A:A■,■ �\
-- - •
-
•
L.
OOP
9'-0"
2ND FLOOR
"
1ST FLOOR `1
CONCEPTUAL SOUTH ELEVATION- EXISTING RELOCATED COTTAGE UNIT
SCALE:
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
I..//.//.III/.///././,//'/•t//,///.■/://:////.■■.//i
•
■
——ao ••••
•
9'-0"
- +2ND FLOOR
' +
1ST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL EAST ELEVATION- EXISTING RELOCATED COTTAGE UNIT
SCALE:
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
l
l
FRONT DOOR/
ENTRY PORCH
-+-
roiscrusiAssa ars to to risks csAtts Ls re Ls 0:11.1.Z7,....
MI
IU)
•
9'-0"
- - - — — — 2ND FLOOR
•
IUP!!!'IHIIIII
O'-On
1ST FLOOR
CONCEPTUAL WEST ELEVATION- EXISTING RELOCATED COTTAGE UNIT
SCALE:
MATERIAL SUMMARY:
EXTERIOR FINISH: CEMENT PLASTER
GARAGE DOOR: OIL STAINED
DOORS: OIL STAINED
WINDOWS: VINYL
ROOF: BARREL CLAY TILE
GROVE STREET
NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA
KITCHEN
9'8'x 13'-3"
DINING ROOM
9'8'x I I'8'
2-CAR GARAGE
19'-3' x 20'-3'
It
BEDROOM
11.-5'x9'2'
Rt5
LIVING ROOM
15'3x20'-3"
CONCEPTUAL FIRST FLOOR
EXISTING HOUSE SCALE: A' - 1'-0'
UP
VA1
UTILITY
BEDROOM
0-0' x 9'-5'
BATH
8 5" ' 5'-0"
Rt5
BEDROOM
9'-9' x
SQUARE FOOTAGE
First Floor 1 33G 50, FT.
Second Flonr: 485 50. FT.
Med.a Room: 415 50. FT.
Total: 223G 50. FT.
56
1�•
-
♦ /
♦ /
♦ /
/
/
♦
♦ DOWN
/
♦ /
♦ /
ART 5TU9!O LK101A ROOM
/ 19.-3. x 23'- \
/ ♦
•
/ ♦
/•
/ ♦
/ ♦
/ ♦
/
/
•
♦
♦
•
•
n�■
DOWN
flI
K4 S
CLOSET
5'-
CONCEPTUAL SECOND FLOOR
EXISTING hCNJSE SCALE: yc'= I'-O'
BATH
x5'O'
MASTER BEDROOM
15-7'x 19' 4"
SITTING ROOM
7' 5' x
SQUARE FOOTAGE
First Moo,: 1336 5Q. FL.
Second Floor: 455 50.17.
Med.a Room: 41 5 5Q. FT.
Total. 2236 5Q. FT.
57
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
`,AEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO. 19
--
ITEM TITLE A Public Hearing to consider the report required by California Health and Safety Code
Section 5473, Et Seq. pertaining to collection of sewer charges on the tax roll, directing the City Clerk to file
said report with the San Diego County Auditor, and directing the Finance Director to certify with the San
Diego County Auditor the "Sewer Service Charge Fund". Sewer service fees will not increase for FY09-10.
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
EXPLANATION Joe Smith, Director Public Works
(Ext. 4587)
See Attached Explanation
Environmental Review J N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Approved By:
Finance Director
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Hold the public hearing
BOARD I COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. Report is on file in the office of the City Clerk
A-200 (9/99)
Explanation:
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2003-2225, the City Council adopted a three-year sewer service fee
rate adjustment schedule commensurate with projected Regional wastewater treatment cost
increases and elected to have sewer service charges collected on the tax roll, as authorized by
California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 et seq.
California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 requires a written report to be prepared each
year and filed with the City Clerk, which should contain a description of each parcel of real
property receiving sewer services, and the amount of the charges for each parcel for the year.
California Health and Safety Code Section 5473.4 provides that on or before August 10 of each
year, the City Clerk shall file with the County Auditor a copy of the report prepared pursuant to
Section 5473 with a statement endorsed on the report over his signature that the report has
been adopted by the City Council, and the Auditor shall enter the amounts of the charges
against the respective lots or parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment roll.
By approving the proposed resolution, the City Council, would for FY2009-2010, adopt the
report required by California Health and Safety Code Section 5473, direct the report to be kept
on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and direct the City Clerk to file a copy of the report with the
County Auditor.
The City of National City sewer service fees are monthly flat rates, based on water consumption
for domestic users. For commercial and industrial users, the monthly charges are variable and
based on water consumption and on the strength of the sewage they generate (low, medium or
high). The table below summarizes the three-year rate plan adopted by the City in 2003.
National City Sewer Service Rates for FY 2004, 2005, and 2006
Residential Flat Rates (per
month)
FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Monthly Monthly Monthly
Single Family Residence
Multi -Family Residence
Mobile Homes
Commercial Variable Rates (per HCF)
Suspended Solids/BOD
Strength Category
Commercial - Low
Commercial - Medium Low
Commercial - Medium
Commercial - Medium High
Commercial - High
Suspended
Solids/BOD
Strength Range
<200 PPM
201 to 280 PPM
281 to 420 PPM
421 to 660 PPM
> 600 PPM
$ 22.08 $
$ 19.00 $
$ 13.50 $
$ 2.85 $
$ 3.09 $
$ 3.84 $
$ 4.60 $
$ 5.75 $
28.08 $
23.00 $
17.50 $
32.08
25.00
19.50
2.89 $ 3.03
3.13 $ 3.28
3.90 $ 4.09
4.68 $ 4.90
5.86 $ 6.12
It should be noted the City of National City sewer service fee have not increased since FY06
and is below the Regional average fee charge for this service. The table below is an illustration
of the fees charged by the major METRO Agency members.
Monthly Rates are based on single family residence charged for 10 HCF (Hundred Cubic Feet).
Agency
2008-09
2009-10
Date
Implemented
Del Mar
$71.15
$109.90
07/01/08
Padre Dam MWD
$41.12
$53.22
01/01/08
Poway
$44.82
$66.99
01/01/09
San Diego
$42.49
$47.62
05/01/08
La Mesa
$39.65
$40.97
07/01/08
Chula Vista
$37.25.
$44.43
07/01/09
Otay Water District
$32.70
$32.70
01/01/08
Alpine
$32.42
$34.83
07/01/08
Lemon Grove
$32.354
$34.83
07/01/08
National City
$32.08
$32.08
No change
Imperial Beach
$31.97
$35.58
07/01/09
Coronado
$31.64
$31.64
No change
Lakeside
$29.50
$31.67
07/01/08
Spring Valley
$26.92
$28.00
07/01/08
El Cajon
$25.90
$26.40
No change
Wintergardens
$18.00
$18.00
No change
verage
Maximum
Minimum
$ 41.80
$ 109.90
$ 18.00
The cost of wastewater collection, transportation and treatment had increased dramatically in
the years prior to 2003. The sewer service rate plan adopted by the City Council in 2003
provided sufficient revenues to cover these costs and those of the NPDES permit compliance
activities necessary to eliminate the amount of urban run-off pollution that enters our storm drain
system. These rates are still applicable today baring any unforeseen changes. Currently, the
Participating Agencies through the METRO Wastewater Joint Power Authority, along with the
City of San Diego that operates, maintains and administers the regional facilities that transport,
treat and dispose of the area's effluent is working on renewing the waiver for secondary
treatment at the Point Loma Treatment Plant, the completion of all past years audits and a
revised Sewage Transportation Agreement, which may increase the rates paid to the member
Agencies. The City Of National City, as a Participating Agency and interested party, is actively
working with METRO/JPA and San Diego staff to assure the increase, if any, is justifiable and
fair to all member Agencies. Staff will keep you informed regarding this potentially significant
issue as the study progresses.
Ordinance for Adoption
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
`I•MAEETING DATE July 21, 2009 AGENDA ITEM NO.
20
ITEM TITLE AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858 AS AN URGENCY MEASURE TO TAKE
EFFECT IMMEDIATELY, ENACTING A MORATORIUM PROHIBITING ESTABLISHMENTS DISPENSING
MARIJUANA FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES IN NATIONAL CITY
PREPARED BY George H. Eiser, III
(Ext. 4221)
EXPLANATION
DEPARTMENT
Please see attached memorandum
City Attorney
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Approved By:
Finance Director
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Ordinance
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below )
'140' Memorandum
Proposed Ordinance
Resolution No.
A-200 (9/99)
Mayor
Ron Morrison
8'8 7
Council Members IR 5R:'O'ATED -. Senior Assistant City Attorney
Frank Parra Claudia Gacitua Silva
Alejandra Sotelo-Solis
Jess Van Deventer Office of the City Attorney Senior Assistant City Attorney
Rosalie Zarate Jodi L. Doucette
City Attomey
George H. Eiser, III
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: July 14, 2009
FROM: City Attorney
SUBJECT: Interim Ordinance to Adopt as an Urgency Measure a Moratorium
Prohibiting Establishments Dispensing Marijuana for Medical Purposes
The Compassionate Use Act of 1996
At the November, 1996 statewide election, the voters approved Proposition 215,
which added Section 11362.5 to the California Health and Safety Code, known as the
Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (the "Act"). Section 11362.5 states the purposes of the
Act as follows:
• To ensure that seriously ill Californians have the right to obtain and use
marijuana for medical purposes where that medical use is deemed
appropriate and has been recommended by a physician who has determined
that the person's health would benefit from the use of marijuana in the
treatment of cancer, anorexia, AIDS, chronic pain, spasticity, glaucoma,
arthritis, migraine, or any other illness for which marijuana provides relief.
• To ensure that patients and their primary caregivers who obtain and use
marijuana for medical purposes upon the recommendation of a physician are
not subject to criminal prosecution or sanction.
• To encourage the federal and state governments to implement a plan to
provide for the safe and affordable distribution of marijuana to all patients in
medical need for marijuana.
The Act decriminalizes marijuana for medical purposes with the following
language:
• Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no physician in this state shall be
punished, or denied any right or privilege, for having recommended marijuana
to a patient for medical purposes.
1243 National City Boulevard; National City, California 91950-4301
Tel.: (619) 336.4220 Fax: (619) 336.4327
Mayor and City Council
July 14, 2009
Page Two
• Section 11357, relating to the possession of marijuana, and Section 11358,
relating to the cultivation of marijuana, shall not apply to a patient, or to a
patient's primary caregiver, who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the
personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral
recommendation or approval of a physician.
The Act gave rise to a new type of land use that could not have existed lawfully
prior to the Act - the medical marijuana dispensary. Chief of Police Adolfo Gonzales has
expressed the firm opposition of the Police Department to establishments dispensing
medical marijuana. Chief Gonzales cites research conducted by the Police Department
through the Drug Enforcement Administration, from which it was determined that
marijuana is a dangerous, addictive drug that poses significant health threats to users;
marijuana has no medical value that can't be met more effectively by legal drugs;
marijuana users are far more likely to use other drugs like cocaine and heroin than non -
marijuana users; and drug legalizers use "medical marijuana" as red herring in effort to
advocate broader legalization of drug use. (See attached memorandum dated July 13,
2009 from Chief of Police Adolfo Gonzales).
Currently, no medical marijuana dispensaries exist in the City. Additionally, no
`., land use regulations exist which clearly apply to such establishments. Because of the
relative newness of this land use, there is concern among City staff as to the effects
such establishments would have on the community. For example, there are questions
as to the effects of this land use upon the CDC's redevelopment activities, the primary
purpose of which is to eliminate blight. Further, there are concerns regarding the
potential for this land use being in conflict with pending redevelopment projects, and
with proposed zoning, specific plan, and General Plan goals. Lastly, before any
consideration is given to regulating or prohibiting medical marijuana dispensaries in the
community, it would be prudent to gather information regarding the effects such
establishments have had on other communities.
It is to allow the study and consideration of these issues that enactment of an
interim ordinance, approving a moratorium which would prohibit medical marijuana
dispensaries, is being recommended. It is also recommended that the ordinance be
enacted as an urgency measure, to take effect immediately.
Statutory Authority for Interim Ordinance
Section 65858 of the California Government Code authorizes a city, in order to
protect the public health, safety and welfare, and without following the procedures
otherwise required prior to the adoption of a zoning ordinance, to adopt as an urgency
measure to take effect immediately an interim ordinance prohibiting any uses which
Mayor and City Council
July 14, 2009
Page Three
may be in conflict with a contemplated general plan, specific plan, or zoning proposal
which the city intends to study within a reasonable time. The initial period that the
interim ordinance remains in effect is 45 days. After a public hearing, the interim
ordinance may be extended for additional periods of 10 months and 15 days, and
subsequently, for one year. A four -fifths vote of the Council is required to pass the
ordinance in each case.
Enactment of an urgency interim ordinance prohibiting establishments dispensing
marijuana for medical purposes, in order to allow consideration of the City's options for
regulation in this area, is recommended.
GEORGE H. EISER, III
City Attorney
GHE/mpa
NATIONAL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 13, 2009
TO: George Eiser, City Attorney
FROM: Adolfo Gonzales, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Medicinal marijuana outlets in the City of National City
The National City Police Department would like to respectfully express their opposition
on opening or allowing medical marijuana outlets to operate within the boundaries of the
City of National City. We concur with current DEA policy and findings from the
Institute of Medicine's research and opinion that marijuana has no legitimate medical
application in addition to being a "gateway" drug to other highly addictive drugs like
cocaine and heroin than non -marijuana users.
Per the DEA and the Institute of Medicine, any determination of a drug's valid medical
use must be based on the best available science undertaken by medical professionals. The
Institute of Medicine conducted a comprehensive study in 1999 to assess the potential
health benefits of marijuana and its constituent cannabinoids. The study concluded that
smoking marijuana is not recommended for the treatment of any disease condition. In
addition, there are more effective medications currently available. For those reasons, the
"Institute of Medicine" concluded that there is little future in smoked marijuana as
a medically approved medication.
From a humanitarian aspect, the City not allowing infirm patients the access to medical
marijuana, the DEA has shown as a result of such research, a synthetic THC drug,
Marinol, has been available to the public since 1985. The Food and Drug Administration
has determined that Marinol is safe, effective, and has therapeutic benefits for use as a
treatment for nausea and vomiting associated with cancer chemotherapy, and as a
treatment of weight loss in patients with AIDS. However, it does not produce the harmful
health effects associated with smoking marijuana.
Per the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), marijuana is a gateway drug most
harmful consequences is its role in leading to the use of other illegal drugs like heroin and
cocaine. Long-term studies of students who use drugs show that very few young people
use other illegal drugs without first trying marijuana. While not all people who use
marijuana go on to use other drugs, using marijuana sometimes lowers inhibitions about
drug use and exposes users to a culture that encourages use of other drugs. The risk of
using cocaine has been estimated to be more than 104 times greater for those who have
tried marijuana than for those who have never tried it.
When considering the impact of opening medical marijuana outlets within the city, one
must consider the impact the increased access will have on criminal activity. In a 1990
report, the National Transportation Safety Board studied 182 fatal truck accidents and
found that just as many of the accidents were caused by drivers using marijuana as were
caused by alcohol -- 12.5 percent in each case. Consider also that drug use, including
marijuana, contributes to crime. A large percentage of those arrested for crimes test
positive for marijuana. Nationwide, 40 percent of adult males tested positive for
marijuana at the time of their arrest.
It's also important to realize that the campaign to allow marijuana to be used as medicine
is a tactical maneuver in an overall strategy to completely legalize all drugs. Pro -
legalization groups have transformed the debate from decriminalizing drug use to one of
compassion and care for people with serious diseases. The New Rork Times interviewed
Ethan Nadelman, Director of the Lindesmith Center, in January 2000. Responding to
criticism from former Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey that the medical marijuana issue is a
stalking-horse for drug legalization, Mr. Nadelman did not contradict General
McCaffrey. "Will it help lead toward marijuana legalization?" Mr. Nadelman said: "I
hope so."
Based on research conducted by the National City Police Department through the DEA,
marijuana is a dangerous, addictive drug that poses significant health threats to users;
marijuana has no medical value that can't be met more effectively by legal drugs;
marijuana users are far more likely to use other drugs like cocaine and heroin than non -
marijuana users and drug legalizers use "medical marijuana" as red herring in effort to
advocate broader legalization of drug use.
Therefore, the National City Police Department stands firmly against any "Medicinal
Marijuana Outlets" and requests a moratorium be placed on further establishment of this
type of business within the city limits of the City of National City.
Dr. Adolfo Gonzales, Chief of Police
National City Police Department
ORDINANCE NO. 2009 —
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858
AS AN URGENCY MEASURE TO TAKE EFFECT
IMMEDIATELY, ENACTING A MORATORIUM
PROHIBITING ESTABLISHMENTS DISPENSING
MARIJUANA FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES IN NATIONAL CITY
WHEREAS, National City, acting through its City Council functioning as the
Board of the Community Development Commission ("CDC"), has been very proactive over the
years in efforts to revitalize the City through redevelopment activities; and
WHEREAS, the CDC Board has created a redevelopment project area of
approximately 2,000 acres in the community; and
WHEREAS, in addition to various projects within the redevelopment project area,
the CDC Board has submitted land use and specific plan proposals for approval by the City,
including proposals affecting the Downtown Project in the vicinity of 8th Street and National City
Boulevard, and that portion of the City which is west of National City Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the City is engaged in the initial stages of amending the General
Plan; and
WHEREAS, a common element of the zoning, General Plan, and specific plan
proposals is the encouragement of projects within specified areas which would promote a
certain atmosphere and cohesiveness and harmony of land uses within those areas; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the enactment of Health and Safety Code Section
11362.5, known as the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, inquiries have recently been made to
City staff concerning the location in the City of establishments dispensing marijuana for medical
purposes; and
WHEREAS, there is concern by the City council that such establishments may
conflict with the contemplated redevelopment, zoning, General Plan, and specific plan proposals
described hereinabove and which the City will be considering in the future; and
WHEREAS, research conducted by the National City Police Department through
the DEA, concludes that marijuana is a dangerous, addictive drug that poses significant health
threats to users; marijuana has no medical value that can't be met more effectively by legal
drugs; marijuana users are far more likely to use other drugs like cocaine and heroin than non -
marijuana users; and drug Iegalizers use "medical marijuana" as a red herring in an effort to
advocate broader legalization of drug use; and
WHEREAS, the National City Police Department stands firmly against the
location of medical marijuana establishments in the City, a position expressed by Dr. Adolfo
Gonzalez, Chief of Police; and
Ordinance No. 2009 —
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it necessary and appropriate to study and
consider the effects of establishments dispensing marijuana for medical purposes, for example,
to gather information as to the effect such establishments have had open other communities;
and
WHEREAS, existing land use controls do not adequately address the potential
adverse effects of the establishments dispensing marijuana for medical purposes in the
community; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that there is a current and immediate threat to
the public health, safety and welfare of the location in the City of establishments dispensing
marijuana for medical purposes, and that the issuance of building permits, certificates of
occupancy and other entitlements for use by such establishments would result in a threat to the
public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds it essential to protect the health, safety and
welfare of the citizens of the City of National City to enact a moratorium for a period of 45 days
on the locating of, development, or approval of establishments dispensing marijuana for medical
purposes; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to adopt, after appropriate study, zoning
measures that would apply throughout the City prohibiting or regulating establishments
dispensing marijuana for medical purposes as soon as practicable, and directs the Planning
Commission of this City to commence studies and procedures necessary for the adoption of
such prohibitions or regulations.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of National City does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. For a period of 45 days from the effective date of this Ordinance, no
building permit, certificate of occupancy, nor entitlement for use shall be issued for and no
construction shall take place relating to an establishment dispensing marijuana for medical
purposes, and no building permit, certificate of occupancy, nor entitlement for use shall be
issued for and no construction shall take place relating to the location, development, or approval
of any establishment dispensing marijuana for medical purposes.
Section 2. The City Council hereby directs the Planning Commission to
commence studies and procedures necessary for the adoption of measures prohibiting or
regulating establishments dispensing marijuana for medical purposes.
Section 3. This Ordinance is adopted as an urgency ordinance necessary for the
immediate preservation of the public health, safety and welfare within the meaning of the
Government Code and shall take effect immediately.
Ordinance No. 2009 —
Page 3
Section 4. If any portion of this Ordinance is found to be invalid, it is the intention of the City
Council that the remaining valid provisions of the Ordinance be severed from the invalid
Provisions and remain in full force and effect.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
�.VIEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO.
21
ITEM TITLE Resolution adopting the report required by Califomia Health and Safety Code Section
5473, Et Seq. pertaining to collection of sewer charges on the tax roll, directing the City Clerk to file said
report with the San Diego County Auditor, and directing the Finance Director to certify with the San Diego
County Auditor the "Sewer Service Charge Fund". Sewer service fees will not increase for FY09-10.
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
EXPLANATION Joe Smith, Director
(Ext. 4587)
See Attached Explanation
Public Works
Environmental Review NI N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Approved By:
Finance Director
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Adopt resolution
BOARD 1 COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No.
1. 1. Proposed resolution
2. Report is on file in the office of City Clerk
A-200 (9/99)
Explanation:
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2003-2225, the City Council adopted a three-year sewer service fee
rate adjustment schedule commensurate with projected Regional wastewater treatment cost
increases and elected to have sewer service charges collected on the tax roll, as authorized by
California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 et seq.
California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 requires a written report to be prepared each
year and filed with the City Clerk, which should contain a description of each parcel of real
property receiving sewer services, and the amount of the charges for each parcel for the year.
California Health and Safety Code Section 5473.4 provides that on or before August 10 of each
year, the City Clerk shall file with the County Auditor a copy of the report prepared pursuant to
Section 5473 with a statement endorsed on the report over his signature that the report has
been adopted by the City Council, and the Auditor shall enter the amounts of the charges
against the respective Tots or parcels of land as they appear on the current assessment roll.
By approving the proposed resolution, the City Council, would for FY2009-2010, adopt the
report required by California Health and Safety Code Section 5473, direct the report to be kept
on file in the Office of the City Clerk, and direct the City Clerk to file a copy of the report with the
County Auditor.
The City of National City sewer service fees are monthly flat rates, based on water consumption
for domestic users. For commercial and industrial users, the monthly charges are variable and
based on water consumption and on the strength of the sewage they generate (low, medium or
high). The table below summarizes the three-year rate plan adopted by the City in 2003.
National City Sewer Service Rates for FY 2004, 2005, and 2006
Residential Flat Rates (per
month)
FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Monthly Monthly Monthly
Single Family Residence
Multi -Family Residence
Mobile Homes
Commercial Variable Rates (per HCF)
Suspended Solids/BOD
Strength Category
Commercial - Low
Commercial - Medium Low
Commercial - Medium
Commercial - Medium High
Commercial - High
Suspended
Solids/BOD
Strength Range
<200 PPM
201 to 280 PPM
281 to 420 PPM
421 to 660 PPM
> 600 PPM
$ 22.08 $
$ 19.00 $
$ 13.50 $
$ 2.85 $
$ 3.09 $
$ 3.84 $
$ 4.60 $
$ 5.75 $
28.08 $
23.00 $
17.50 $
32.08
25.00
19.50
2.89 $ 3.03
3.13 $ 3.28
3.90 $ 4.09
4.68 $ 4.90
5.86 $ 6.12
It should be noted the City of National City sewer service fee have not increased since FY06
and is below the Regional average fee charge for this service. The table below is an illustration
of the fees charged by the major METRO Agency members.
Monthly Rates are based on single family residence charged for 10 HCF (Hundred Cubic Feet).
Agency
2008-09
2009-10
Date
Implemented
Del Mar
$71.15
$109.90
07/01/08
Padre Dam MWD
$41.12
$53.22
01/01/08
Poway
$44.82
` $66.99
01 /01 /09
San Diego
$42.49
$47.62
05/01/08
La Mesa
$39.65
$40.97
07/01/08
Chula Vista
$37.25:
$44.43
:
07/01/09
Otay Water District
$32,70
$32:70
01/01/08
Alpine
$32.42
$34.83
07/01/08
Lemon Grove
$32.35
$34.83
07/01/08
National City
$32.08
$32.08
No change
Imperial Beach
$31.97
$35.58
07/01/09
Coronado
$31.64
$31.64
No change
Lakeside
$29.50
$31.67
07/01/08
Spring Valley
$26.92
$28.00
07/01/08
El Cajon
$25.90
$26.40
No change
Wintergardens
$18.00
$18.00
No change
Average
Maximum
Minimum
$ 41.80
$ 109.90
$ 18.00
The cost of wastewater collection, transportation and treatment had increased dramatically in
the years prior to 2003. The sewer service rate plan adopted by the City Council in 2003
provided sufficient revenues to cover these costs and those of the NPDES permit compliance
activities necessary to eliminate the amount of urban run-off pollution that enters our storm drain
system. These rates are still applicable today baring any unforeseen changes. Currently, the
Participating Agencies through the METRO Wastewater Joint Power Authority, along with the
City of San Diego that operates, maintains and administers the regional facilities that transport,
treat and dispose of the area's effluent is working on renewing the waiver for secondary
treatment at the Point Loma Treatment Plant, the completion of all past years audits and a
revised Sewage Transportation Agreement, which may increase the rates paid to the member
Agencies. The City Of National City, as a Participating Agency and interested party, is actively
working with METRO/JPA and San Diego staff to assure the increase, if any, is justifiable and
fair to all member Agencies. Staff will keep you informed regarding this potentially significant
issue as the study progresses.
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 —
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
ADOPTING THE REPORT REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA
HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTION 5473, ET SEQ.
PERTAINING TO COLLECTION OF SEWER SERVICE CHARGES ON
THE TAX ROLL, DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO FILE SAID REPORT
WITH THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY AUDITOR, AND DIRECTING THE
FINANCE DIRECTOR TO CERTIFY WITH THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
AUDITOR THE "SEWER SERVICE CHARGE FUND"
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2003-2225, the City Council adopted a
three-year sewer service fee rate adjustment schedule commensurate with projected regional
wastewater treatment cost increases, and elected to have sewer service charges collected on
the tax roll, as authorized by California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 et seq.; and
WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 5473 requires a report to
be prepared each year and filed with the City Clerk, which report shall contain a description of
each parcel of real property receiving sewer service and the amount of the sewer service
charges for each parcel for the year; and
WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 5473.4 provides that on
or before August 10 of each year, the City Clerk shall file with the Auditor a copy of the report
prepared pursuant to Section 5473 with a statement endorsed on the report over his signature
that the report has been adopted by the City Council, and the Auditor shall enter the amounts of
the charges against the respective Tots or parcels of land as they appear on the current
assessment roll.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that for FY 2008-2009, the City Council
of the City of National City hereby adopts the Report required by California Health and Safety
Code Section 5473, et seq., directs that said report be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk,
and directs the City Clerk to file with the San Diego County Auditor a copy of the Report, with a
statement that the Report has been adopted by the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Finance Director is hereby directed to
certify with the San Diego County Auditor the establishment of Fund No. 6065-5, which shall be
described as "Sewer Service Charge", and that said fund is hereby approved.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21 st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
\.eEETING DATE July 21, 2009
AGENDA ITEM NO.
22
(---
TEM TITLE RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REDUCING THE\
LIBRARY GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-2010
FROM 1.30 CENTS PER $100 OF ASSESSED VALUATION TO 1.27 CENTS
PREPARED BY DEPARTMENT
Tess E. Limfueco /' Finance Dep
Financial Services fficer Jeanette Ladn.o
EXPLANATION (619)336-4331
At the special municipal election held on March 5, 2002, more than two-thirds of National City's
eligible voters approved the issuance of General Obligation Bonds to fund the construction of the new
National City Library. In April 2003, the City issued the General Obligation Bonds in the aggregate
principal amount of $6 Million. The bonds mature on August 1st in each of the years 2004 through
2028. The amount of principal and interest that become due every year will be paid from the proceeds
of property taxes received from the County of San Diego.
Each year the City must establish the property tax rate that will be necessary to raise the revenue
required to service its annual bonded indebtedness. For the Fiscal Year 2009-2010, the calculated
property tax rate is 1.27 cents per $100 of assessed value. This is a 2.3% reduction from Fiscal Year
2008-2009 rate of 1.30 cents.
Environmental Review ✓ N/A
Financial Statement N/A
Approved by:
Jeanet Ladrido, Finance Director
Account No. N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
N/A
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No.
T.,. Resolution
2. General Obligation Bond Tax Rate Computation for FY2009-2010
A-200 (9/80)
RESOLUTION NO. 2009-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF TIIE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY REDUCING
THE LIBRARY GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND
TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009-10 FROM
1.30 CENTS PER $100 OF ASSESSED
VALIDATION TO 1.27 CENTS
WHEREAS, the total net taxable secured assessed valuation of the City is
now at $3,023,672,000 full value; and
WIIEREAS, the amount of revenue to be raised from the tax base for
Fiscal Year 2009/10 is $399,500, according to the voter approved bonded indebtedness,
thereby establishing the rate of property tax required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Library General
Obligation Bond tax rate for the City of National City for the fiscal year ending June 30,
2010. be and hereby is established at .0127% per $100 assessed value.
2002 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS:
0.0127% PER $100 ASSESSED VALUE
PASSED and ADOPTED this 21 st day of July, 2009.
Ron Morrison, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser III
City Attorney
General Obligation Bond Debt Service (Fund 259)
Tax Rate Computation for FY2009-2010
National City
Secured Valuation
Unsecured Valuation
1 Net Secured Valuation
3 Less Delinquency Allowan
4 Net after Delingency
5 Plus HOPTR
6 Prelim Adj Secured
Valuation
7 Less Redevelopment
Impact
8 Adj Sec Valuation Less
Redevelopment Impact
9 Anticipated Roll
Corrections
10 Adj Sec Val for Rate
Computation
16 Computed Rate
17 Plus .0001
Fund No. 6065-50
Assessed FY09/10
Rate Valuation Est. Revenue
0.0127 3,023,672,000 382,495
0.0143 172,119,000 24,613
3,023,672,000
0.00% -
3,023,672,000
31,299,000
3,054,971,000
3,054,971,000
0.0200 60,473,440
2,994,497,560
0.0001
0.01255
0.01265
407,108
11 Amount to be raised
12 Unsecured HOPTR
14 Unsecured Delinquency
15 Less Unsecured
Redevelopment Impact
16 Amount to be raised by
Secured Taxes
18a Tax rate times #4
399,500
0
23,628
0
375,872
379,471
18b Tax rate times HOPTR 3,928
19 Secured Proof 383,399
20 Raised by 1/100th mil 2,994
21,23 Taxes Raised 410,022
RTIFY THAT THABOV-.COMPUTED RATE + 1/100TH MIL IS A REASONABLE TAX RATE FOR THIS FUND
Je ette Ladrido
Finance Director
1-172r job
Date
`EETING DATE: July 21 2009
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT
National City, California
AGENDA ITEM NO. 23
ITEM TITLE: Authorize the reimbursement of Community Development Commission expenditures in
the amount of $688,833.02 to the City of National City for the period of 06/17/09 through 06/23/09
PREPARED BY: Jeanette Ladrido,
Finance Director
EXPLANATION:
DEPARTMENT Finance
(619) 336-4331
Effective July 1, 2008, the Community Development Commission's fiscal operations have been merged with
the City of National City. In order to streamline the payment process, the City of National City pays for all ex-
penditures for the CDC.
Attached is a detailed listing of all CDC warrants paid for with the City General Funds. Staff requests ap-
proval of the reimbursement of CDC activity.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
Approve the reimbursement of funds to the City of National City in the amount of $688,833.02
J
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept and File.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
N
I
fPrTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
Warrants for the period the period of 06/17/09 through 06/23/09
4
PAYEE
BEARD
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SVCS
HORIZON HEALTH EAP
HUSK PARTNERS
L.B. CIVIL CONSTRUCTION
SECTION 8
SECTION 8 HAPS PAYMENTS
�-• CALIFORNIA
NAT a 'Ty
cv
INCORPORATV)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
WARRANT REGISTER # 52
6/23/2009
DESCRIPTION
REIMB-REVOLVING LOAN FUND GRANT TRA
CREDIT BACKGROUND CHECK FOR S8
EMP ASSIST PROGRAM JUN 09 - CDC
CONSULTING SERVICES - JUNE 2009
MAY 2009 SERVICES
Start Date End Date
6/17/2009 6/23/2009
CHK NO DATE
227595 6/22/09
227596 6/23/09
227597 6/23/09
227598 6/23/09
227599 6/23/09
AMOUNT
792.35
75.21
114.56
7,500.00
676, 079.05
A/P Total $ 684,561.17
4,271.85
GRAND TOTAL $ 688,833.02
•
-0-zeAL FO N.14 —0-
.
8 8
nvcoRpoRATeD
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Warrant Register # 52
6/23/2009
502 SECTION 8 FUND
511 TAX INCREMENT FUND
4,326.02
684,507.00
688,833.02
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
AGENDA STATEMENT
National City, California
'iIEETING DATE: July 21 2009 AGENDA ITEM NO.
ITEM TITLE: Authorize the reimbursement of Community Development Commission expenditures in
the amount of $259,989.87 to the City of National City for the period of 06/24/09 through 06/30/09
24
PREPARED BY: Jeanette Ladrido,
Finance Director
EXPLANATION:
DEPARTMENT Finance
(619) 336-4331
Effective July 1, 2008, the Community Development Commission's fiscal operations have been merged with
the City of National City. In order to streamline the payment process, the City of National City pays for all ex-
penditures for the CDC.
Attached is a detailed listing of all CDC warrants paid for with the City General Funds. Staff requests ap-
proval of the reimbursement of CDC activity.
Environmental Review N/A
Financial Statement
Approve the reimbursement of funds to the City of National City in the amount of $259,989.87
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept and File.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
/
TACHMENTS (Listed Below)
Warrants for the period the period of 06/24/09 through 06/30/09
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
WARRANT REGISTER # 53
6/30/2009
PAYEE
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRIC
BEST BEST & KRIEGER LLP
BRG CONSULTING, INC
CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT ASSO
CHRISTENSEN & SPATH LLP
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DESROCHERS
EDCO DISPOSAL
ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS SERVICES
FEDEX
GE CAPITAL
GTC SYSTEMS INC
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
NATIONAL ALLERGY SUPPLY INC
NBS
PYATOK ARCHITECTS INC
SDG&E
.RADLING YOCCA CARLSON &
`,,JEETWATER AUTHORITY
THE STAR NEWS
URBAN FUTURES
WELLS FARGO BANK
CHRISTMAS IN JULY
GARDA CL WEST, INC.
SECTION 8
SECTION 8 HAPS PAYMENTS
PAYROI.I.
Pay period Start Date
13 6/2/2009
DESCRIPTION
REFUND -ENTERPRISE ZONE
COMMUNITY YOUTH ATHLETIC CENTER
DOWNTOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
CRA LAWSUIT ASSESSMENT
HOUSING LEGAL SERVICES
MARY 2009 SERVICES, SPEC 08-13
RETIREMENT BENEFIT - JUNE2009
1615 E 4TH STREET - MAY 2009
HUD HEALTHY HOMES DEM GRANT
COURIER SERVICES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
REIMB-HEALTHY HOMES DEM
AQUATIC CENTER
REIMB HEALTHY HOMES DEM
PBID ADMINSTRATION
WESTSIDE INFILL TOD - MAY 2009
921A AVE 05/19 - 06/18/09
RDA GENERAL SERVICES
1310 HIGHLAND AVE
NC EVENTS AD
IMPLEMENTATION PERFORMANCE
CREDIT CARD EXPENSES
CDBG GRANT FOR NC YOUTH PROGRAM
SVC PERIOD JUNE 08 THRU FEB 09
Start Date
6/24/2009
End Date
6/15/2009
End Date
6/30/2009
Check Date
6/24/2009
CHK NO DATE AMOUNT
227724 6/25/09 12,365.44
227725 6/30/09 151.18
227726 6/30/09 12,055.00
227727 6/30/09 626.00
227728 6/30/09 985.00
227729 6/30/09 18,271.00
227730 6/30/09 110.00
227731 6/30/09 104.75
227732 6/30/09 708.00
227733 6/30/09 96.66
227734 6/30/09 420.86
227735 6/30/09 1,006.25
227736 6/30/09 900.00
227737 6/30/09 1,329.00
227738 6/30/09 2,276.47
227739 6/30/09 17,156.14
227740 6/30/09 187.89
227741 6/30/09 1,670.50
227742 6/30/09 1,048.63
227743 6/30/09 154.35
227744 6/30/09 1,365.00
227745 6/30/09 2,826.34
227790 6/30/09 92,976.00
227791 6/30/09 2,831.82
A/P Total $ 171,622.28
5,102.78
83,264.81
GRAND TOTAL $ 259,989.87
4)- CAIlIFORN;IAr-ef
NA"
INCORPORATED
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Warrant Register # 53
6/30/2009
502 SECTION 8 FUND
505 HOME FUND
506 HOME LOAN PROGRAM FUND
511 TAX INCREMENT FUND
522 LOW/MODERATE HOUSING FUND
25,795.17
559.26
92, 976.00
138,254.50
2,404.94
259,989.87
City of National City, California
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
....4 IEETING DATE
July 21, 2009 AGENDA ITEM NO.
25
ITEM TITLE REAL PROPERTY TRANSACTION FOR FORMER DAYS INN SITE; 1.07 - ACRE PARCEL
LOCATED AT 1640 EAST PLAZA BOULEVARD (A.P.N. 557-410-200)
PREPARED BY
George H. Eiser, III
(Ext. 4221)
DEPARTMENT
City Attorney
EXPLANATION
The purpose of this report is to update the CDC Board regarding staffs effort in negotiating the sale,
including the price and terms of the payment, of the former Days Inn property, a 1.07 - acre parcel
located at 1640 East Plaza Boulevard, currently owned by the CDC. Executive Director Brad Raulston is
the negotiator for the CDC, and the other negotiating party is The Mar Group. This is a companion item to
the closed session item on the agenda.
Environmental Review NI N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Approved By:
Finance Director
Account No.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Accept and file.
BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS ( Listed Below) Resolution No.
N/A
A-200 (9/99)
ITEM #26
7/21/09
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP UPDATE
(DEVELOPMENT)
ITEM #27
7/21 /09
CLOSED SESSION REPORT
(CITY ATTORNEY)