HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC resoRESOLUTION NO. 10-2014
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING A COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR
THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF ALLEYWAY BETWEEN
WEST 16TH & WEST 18TH STREETS IN THE COASTAL ZONE.
APPLICANT: RANDAL EHM, ARCHITECT
CASE FILE NO. 2013-30 CDP
WHEREAS the PIo=nfnc CommfSic., Of the City of National C
:',<:'csi`wed
Coastal Development Permit for the vacation of a portion of alleyway between West
16th & West 18 h Streets in the coastal zone, at a duly advertised public hearings held
on April 7, 2014, at which time oral and documentary evidence was presented; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearings the Planning Commission considered the
staff report contained in Case File No. 2013-30 CDP maintained by the City and
incorporated herein by reference along with evidence and testimony at said hearing;
and,
WHEREAS, this action is taken pursuant to all applicable procedures required by
State law and City law; and,
WHEREAS, the action recited herein is found to be essential for the preservation
of public health, safety, and general welfare.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City
of National City, California, that the testimony and evidence presented to the Planning
Commission at the public hearing held on April 7, 2014, support the following findings:
1. That granting of this Coastal Development Permit is consistent with all other City
plans and ordinances, since the project complies with applicable Land Use Code
requirements, and since the industrial use involved in the project is identified by
the General Plan as an appropriate use in the project area. Furthermore, the
vacation conforms to several General Plan policies as considered and adopted
by the Planning Commission under File No. 2013-30 SC.
2. That the granting of this Coastal =Dev'elopme-� �t Permit is consistent with and
implements the Certif€€ed Locai Coastal Program, since the Local Coastal Plan
identifies marine related businesses as priority uses within Subarea I of the Local
Coastal Plan, since the proposed alley vacation does not conflict with any policies
or goals of the Local Coastal Plan, and since no existing or proposed coastal
access will be affected.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the application for Coastal Development Permit
is approved subject to the following conditions:
General
1. Approval of this Coastal Development Permit shall not be active until the associated
Street Vacation application has been approved and completed. If the associated
Street Vacation request is denied, this Coastal Development Permit shall be null and
void.
2. Within four (4) days of approval, pursuant to Fish and Game Code 711.4 and the
California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 753.5, the applicant shall pay all
necessary environmental fling fees for the San Diego County Clerk. Checks shall be
made payable to the County Clerk and submitted to the National City Planning
Department.
3. This permit shall become null and void if not exercised within one year after adoption
of the resolution of approval unless extended according to procedures specified in
Section 18.12.040 of the Municipal Code.
Building/Fire
4. Plans submitted for improvements must comply with the 2013 edition of the California
Building, Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, and Fire Codes.
6. Emergency access shall be provided to the property from both ends of the alleyway,
including turnaround provisions, as per Fire Department requirements. Said access
shall be noted on plans submitted for construction.
Utilities
6. Prior to any construction or grading activities, the applicant shall coordinate with all
utilities with infrastructure in the area to ensure protection of any existing utility
services.
7. Call 800-227-2600 (Underground Service Alert) for mark out prior to any digging
activities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that copies of this Resolution be transmitted
forthwith to the applicant and to the City Council.
BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective and final on the
day following the City Council meeting where the Planning Commission resolution is set for
review, unless an appeal in writing is filed with the City Clerk prior to 5:00 p.m. on the day of
that City Council meeting. The City Council may, at that meeting, appeal the decision of the
Planning Commission and set the matter for public hearing.
CERTIFICATION:
This certifies that the Resolution was adopted by the Pianning Commission at their meeting of
April 7, 2014, by the foliowing vote:
AYES: Garcia, Baca, Bush, Pruitt, Alvarado, Flores, Dela Paz
NAYS: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Pone
CHAIRMAN