HomeMy WebLinkAboutEDCO Disposal Corporation - Rate Adjustment and Curbside Recycling - 1991City of National City, Californic
CVUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE May 28, 1991
AGENDA ITEM NO. 9
1JTEM TITLE A REPORT ON THE CURBSIDE RECYCLING PILOT PROGRAM, A RECOMMENDF
CHANGE IN THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF A RATE CHANGE, AND A PROPOSAL
FOR A RATE CHANGE
PREPARED BY C. R. WILLIAMS,
EXPLANATION.
See attached report.
DEPARTMENT Public Works
Environmental Review x N/A
Financial Statement
Increase in rates will result in increased costs to our citizens and
increased revenue to the city due franchise fee.
Account No. N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
APPROVE CITYWIDE CURBSIDE RECYCLING JULY 1, 1991. APPROVE RESCHEDULING
RATE EFFECTIVE DATE FROM OCTOBER 1, 1991 TO JULY 1, 1991. APPROVE
REVISED RATE SCHEDULE.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below) x Resolution No 91-104
1. Council Agenda Statement Explanation - September 25, 1990 meeting
2. EDCO Disposal Corporation letter dated May 15, 1991
3. 830 pilot recycling data
4. Magazine article "Recyclers Have an Impact!"
A•zoo5luv. vtdionthly refuse rates of incorporated cities
6. Bulky item pickup log
A
t
L
RESOLUTION NO. 91-104
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A
CITYWIDE CURBSIDE RECYCLING PROGRAM
AND APPROVING A TRASH SERVICE RATE INCREASE
FOR EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION
WHEREAS, the last trash service rate increase for
EDCO Disposal Corporation, the City's franchised trash
collector, was approved in September 1990; and
WHEREAS, the County of San Diego will raise the rate
of solid waste disposal effective July 1, 1991, and the City
Council has approved that this type increase be treated as a
pass -through cost to trash subscribers; and
WHEREAS, additional services are being requested of
the EDCO Disposal Corporation, to wit, citywide curbside
recycling; and
WHEREAS, the new trash service rates would be
comparable to those of surrounding cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of National City that the proposed rate schedule,
a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby
approved to be effective July 1, 1991.
PASSED and ADOPTED this 28th day of May, 1991.
jI„.rjJt.454ell:
eorge H Waters, Mayor
ATTEST:
jiLorAnne Peoples, Ci y Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
George H. Eiser, III
City Attorney
NATIONAL CITY RATE SCHEDULE
7-1-91
RUBBISH AND GARBAGE (COMMERCIAL CURRENT PROPOSED
MRATELY MONTHLY
AND INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS)
RATE RATE
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
One time per week -per month
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Two times per week -per month
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Three times per week -per month
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Four times per week -per month
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Daily (six days/Monday thru
Saturday)
Additional or unusual accumulation
of rubbish (per cubic yard)
EXHIBIT A
10.25 11.85
16.30 18.85
21.00
25.95
33.90
24.25
29.95
39.15
6.15 7.10
NATIONAL CITY RATE SCHEDULE
7-1-91
BOX TYPE REFUSE SERVICE
CURRENT PROPOSED
NUMBER COLLECTION YARDS PER MONTHLY MONTHLY
BINS FREQUENCY MONTH RATE RATE
1 1 13 54.25 62.65
1 2 26 87.30 100.85
1 3 39 120.35 139.00
1 4 52 153.40 177.20
1 5 65 186.50 215.40
1 6 78 219.50 253.50
1 7 91 271.75 313.85
2 1 26 110.20 127.30
2 2 52 174.00 200.95
2 3 78 238.95 276.00
2 4 104 306.80 354.35
2 5 130 355.55 410.65
2 6 156 404.85 467.60
2 7 182 475.60 549.30
3 1 39 116.25 134.25
3 2 78 255.20 294.75
3 3 117 349.15 403.25
3 4 156 405.15 467.95
3 5 195 523.75 604.95
3 6 234 630.45 728.15
3 7 273 777.80 898.35
4 1 52 197.20 227.75
4 2 104 321.30 371.10
4 3 156 445.75 514.85
4 4 208 522.00 602.90
4 5 260 673.95 778.40
4 6 312 759.20 876.85
4 7 364 999.90 1154.90
5 1 65 234.30 270.60
5 2 130 388.60 448.85
5 3 195 543.15 627.35
5 4 260 667.00 770.40
5 5 325 801.00 925.15
5 6 390 966.85 1116.70
5 7 455 1186.10 1369.95
6 1 78 271.15 313.15
6 2 156 455.90 526.55
6 3 234 640.60 739.90
6 4 312 737.20 851.45
6 5 390 892.60 1030.95
6 6 468 1086.35 1254.75
6 7 546 1336.00 1543.10
NATIONAL CITY RATE SCHEDULE
7-1-91
RUBBISH AND GARBAGE
1. RESIDENTIAL
Per month residential single family
properties.
For the second and for each additional
residential unit in multiple dwellings
which do not exceed four units
CURRENT PROPOSED
MONTHLY MONTHLY
RATE RATE
8.75 10.10
6.60 7.60
2. TRAILER PARKS AND MOTELS (5.00 MINIMUM)
One time per week, per unit, per month 6.20 7.15
3. APARTMENT HOUSES (NO MINIMUM)
One time per week, per unit, per month 6.15 7.10
4. SENIOR CITIZEN -RESIDENTIAL
Per month 7.10 8.20
Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California,
on May 28, 1991 by the following vote, to -wit:
Ayes: Councilmen Dal la. Inzunza, Van Deventer, Zarate, Waters
Nays: Councilmen None
Absent: Councilmen None
Abstain: Councilmen None
AUTHENTICATED BY:
,,.. 1CST
GEORGE H. WATERS
Mayor of the City of National City, California
City Clerk of the City of National Cfty, California
(Segl�!a By:
Deputy
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and cor-
rect copy of RESOLUTION NO.9.1.-104 of the City of National City,
Calif., passed and adopted by the Council of said City on ...May..28,...1991.
(Seal)
By:
City Clerk of the City of National City, California
Deputy
SUBJECT: A REPORT ON THE CURBSIDE RECYCLING PILOT PROGRAM, A
RECOMMENDED CHANGE IN THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF A RATE
CHANGE, AND A PROPOSAL FOR A RATE CHANGE
ISSUES: (1) SHOULD THE CITY CONTRACT WITH EDCO FOR THE
FULL CITYWIDE CURBSIDE RECYCLING EFFORT.
(2) SHOULD THE RATE INCREASE DATE BE CHANGED FROM
OCTOBER 1, 1991 TO JULY 1, 1991.
(3) SHOULD THE RATE INCREASE PROPOSED BY EDCO BE
APPROVED.
REFERENCES:
A) Explanation and approved recommendations from
September 25, 1990 Council minutes.
B) Rate request letter from EDCO of May 15, 1991.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. THAT EDCO BE AUTHORIZED TO COMMENCE THE CITYWIDE
CURBSIDE RECYCLING ON JULY 1, 1991;
2. THAT THE ANNUAL RATE REVISION REVIEW BE SCHEDULED
TO BE EFFECTIVE JULY 1 EACH YEAR;
3. THAT THE RATE INCREASE PROPOSED BY EDCO BE
APPROVED, EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1991.
FISCAL IMPACT:
1) On City - There will be an increase in revenue from
franchise fees.
2) On Citizens - An increase in trash costs from $8.75
per month for single family to $10.10, with corres-
ponding rate increases for all other customers.
BACKGROUND:
In September of 1990 a rate increase for EDCO was
approved by Council. This rate increase was accompanied by a
number of additional services - an 830 single-family curbside
recycling pilot program (with citywide curbside to start
July 1, 1991 upon approval by Council), bulky item pickup to
be included in the established rate, a refrigerator door
program to be included in the established rate, and a second
citywide cleanup to be put in effect. Additionally, changes
in the tipping fee charges by the County were established to
-2-
be a pass -through cost with a rate change to be concurrent
with the tipping fee increase, the franchise fee increase to
5% was deferred to October, 1992, and the local CPI was
selected to be the rate increase indicator (with a cap of 6%
maximum), also in October 1991.
Strict adherence to the wording of the current contract
would have a rate increase in July (tipping fee increase pass -
through effective with the imposition of the tipping fee
increase on July 1); and a second rate increase immediately
after, on October 1, to accommodate the CPI increase and the
curbside recycling charge. This would not only be
unpalatable to our citizens but would also require an
artificially high rate. The recycling increase would have
to be recouped over only nine months vice a normal 12 months.
I have accordingly requested EDCO to present two rate
structures - one to accommodate a single rate change July 1,
1991, the other to consider a single change on October 1,
1991.
DISCUSSION:
(1) CURBSIDE: The Council specifically requested that
the curbside pilot program be brought back for
review by Council and for specific authorization to
go forward to the citywide program July 1. Data on
the results of the pilot program to date are
contained on Attachment I hereto. As anticipated,
the response was somewhat less than that of some of
our neighbors. See the table of Attachment II.
Experience countywide indicates that communities
with demographics similar to those of ours do not
have high response levels.
Additional passive or active participation by city
figures, both elected and others, is in the
planning phase for future publicity, as is an
appeal to recycling through education within the
school system. Although these measures will help,
no one truly feels that they will permit attainment
of recycling levels necessary. It well could be
that more draconian measures may be required to
encourage recycling to meet state -mandated solid
waste diversion percentages (i.e., per can rates,
mandatory recycling, etc.). The program must go;
EDCO is well -positioned both to provide services to
National City, and to the area as a major recycler.
It is recommended that it be authorized to commence
the citywide curbside recycling on July 1, 1991 as
planned.
-3--
Recycling, by protecting the environment, by
extending the life of existing landfills thus delay-
ing the date when more expensive or more remote
sites must be used, by lessening the use of virgin
materials, etc., provides benefits for all who use
trash services.
There are four major parts to the recycling
program: (1) Single-family curbside, (2) multi-
family, (3) commercial/industrial, and (4) yard
waste. Each of these programs will require expendi-
tures in excess of the revenues they produce.
Curbside, being the easiest to accomplish, has been
done first. Although many cities have decided to
place the full fiscal burden of the single-family
curbside program onto single-family residences, the
charges in National City have been apportioned
among all beneficiaries of the recycling effort,
that is, among all receivers of trash service. To
do otherwise would not be fair. Our system of
charges will provide a more even-handed approach to
the costs of recycling.
Assuming that the July 1 curbside recycling
implementation and cost increase date is approved,
the cost impact of recycling on single-family
housing will be $0.52 per month. Remember that
recycling costs are spread among all customers. If
single-family, alone, had to bear the full cost (as
is done in other cities), the cost would be $1.66
per month. This is the number to use for
comparison with other cities' costs, which are
indicated on Attachment III.
2) SHOULD RATE REVIEW TIME BE CHANGED FROM OCTOBER TO
JULY?
When EDCO's contract was most recently extended, it
was done in the October time frame. It seemed
appropriate for the rates to be for a one-year
period, and thus future rate changes would also be
in OCTOBER.
Changes in the County's tipping fees are a pass -
through cost, to occur concurrently with the rate
change. We have a major tipping fee change
scheduled for July 1 (from $18/ton to $23/ton - a
26.8% increase!) plus a scheduled July 1 starting
of the citywide curbside recycling. Both of these
events will increase the cost basis of the
contractor. We are faced with the dilemma of
-4-
having a rate increase in July and another one in
October, or of combining all increases into one
change. Two rate changes within a 4-month period
is simply not doable because of the loss of citizen
confidence in management of the city, and to the
follow-on "injury" to the credibility of elected
officials. The choice seemingly is one rate
increase - either July 1 or October 1.
If we go in October, the rates required will be
artificially high in that the contractor will have
three months' costs (July 1 - October 1) associated
with the tipping fee increase and curbside
recycling, for which he will receive no income. He
will have to recoup these three months' costs plus
the 12 months' costs from October 29, 1991 to
October 29, 1992 over the 12-month period. These
two elements of cost will accordingly have to be
about 25% higher if we start in October rather than
July.
If we go the other way - that is, make the rate
change effective on July 1, the tipping fee and
citywide curbside problems go away, and we have the
problem of the normal rate increases (equal to the
CPI). If we were to give EDCO the full annual CPI,
we would be allowing 12 months worth of increase in
only a 9-month period. If, however, only 9/12 of
the CPI increase were allowed, then the actual
increase would be scaled back to the 9-month period
and would be correct. This is what is being recom-
mended; specifically:
that there be only a single rate increase for
the tipping fee increase, for starting
citywide recycling, for the normal cost of
living CPI and for other costs.
that the increase occur effective July 1991,
and on July 1 during the rest of the contract
period.
and that only 9/12 of the CPI increase be
allowed for the July 1991 change.
3) SHOULD THE RATE INCREASE PROPOSED BY EDCO BE
APPROVED?
As discussed above, there is rationale for causing
the annual rate adjustment to occur either July 1
or October 1 (but not for two rate increases).
-5-
EDCO's rate review request dated MAY 15, 1991,
along with his auditor's report (see Reference B),
are developed to permit selection of either the
July 1 or the October 1 effective date. EDCO is
recommending a July 1 date, which develops a single-
family rate increase from $8.75 to $10.10 per
month, with other residential rates compatible.
The auditor's report shows that waiting to October
1 develops a single-family rate of $10.49.
You may remember that we required the contractor to
absorb two tipping fee increases when the 1990 rate
increase was approved. The amount we are paying
now for service is higher by $0.45 per month for
having those tipping fees absorbed. The revised
July 1 rate will take the residual amount "owed"
for the three months remaining in the "rate" year
(July 1 to October 1) and spread the cost over the
12 months of the July 1, 1991 - July 1, 1992
contract. This will reduce this part of the bill
from $0.45/month for single-family down to
$0.11/month (and commercial accordingly) as shown
in the auditor's report of Reference (b).
The amount projected last year to cover the
additional special services has proved inadequate.
Special services include emptying citywide litter
cans, bin trash service to the city facilities,
disposal of sweeper sweepings, and the misnamed
"free" services to citizens including the second
citywide cleanup, the bulky item pickup, and the
refrigerator door program. A summary of the bulky
items activity is provided as Attachment IV. The
primary reason for the increase is that the cost of
disposal (tipping costs) for roll -off bins will
increase from $100 per roll -off, to a figure of
$23.00 per ton. This change in rate basis - that
is, from a flat fee to a fee by weight - is
generally a wash. A roll -off is usually about four
tons. However, the sweeper sweepings roll -offs are
averaging 8-1/2 tons each. The cost to dump will
go from $100 each to about $200 each. This will
add about $0.09 to the single-family bill, the
other $0.03 to make the $0.12 being requested for
special services in the higher -than -anticipated use
of the bulky items service. An additional
$0.12/month residential is being requested to
adequately cover the costs of these "free"
services.
-6-
Analyzing the increase requested in Reference B shows the
following:
CURRENT RATE $8.75
July 1 tipping fee increase $0.73
Increased utilization special
services $0.12
Recycling program (shared
costs with all customers) $0.52
9/12 annual CPI $0.33
TOTAL INCREASE $1.70
Offset by reduction in
prior years' tipping fee
absorption by contractor
(was $0.45, now $0.11)
NET RATE INCREASE
*Rounded to $1.35
NEW RATE REQUESTED
OVERALL RATE INCREASE $1.35 = 15.5%
-.34
$1.36*
$10.10
Note that only $0.33 is contractor's
cost -of -living increase - by itself
only a 3.77% increase. The other
portions of the increase were caused
by provision of additional service.
Attachment III shows costs in nearby jurisdictions. Note
that these costs, being as of March 91, do not reflect
the July 1, 1991 tipping fee increase. Also note that
they are not always comparing the same thing in that
franchise fees vary widely, trash activities included
vary widely (e.g., our special "free" programs), and rate
changes do not occur on the same schedule.
CONCLUSION:
From the above discussions, it is seen that in National
City the rate of participation and the pounds of recyclables
per house put out is low, now, and will remain so in
comparison to our more affluent, less diversified and more
stable neighbors. This means that our recycling will not be
-7-
as effective, and consequently our costs will be higher than
theirs now and in the future.
It may also
range problems
vs. $10.49) if
July 1, 1991,
increase to 5%
1992.
seen that both the long-range and short -
are less, and the rates will be less ($10.10
we shift the rate change effectiveness date to
and each year thereafter. The franchise fee
scheduled for October 1, 1992 to occur July 1,
be
It further appears that the price offered by EDCO has
been reasonably developed and is not out of line with those
of nearby jurisdictions.
ALTERNATIVES:
a. The present agreement would require a rate change
in July and one in October. Although this could be
done, it appears unpalatable.
b. The contractor could be requested to upfront the
curbside recycling and landfill tipping fees until
October, with the rate change effective October 1.
This will result in higher rates for our citizens
in that contractor will have to recover 15 months
of costs in 12 months. Not recommended.
c. The recycling portion could be put out to bid.
This would still require resolution of the
July/October effective date for a rate change. It
would not only stop the present city's 830 family
pilot curbside program but would also delay the
start of the citywide program. County staff now
has a County Mandatory Curbside Recycling Program
ready to present to the TRASH TASK FORCE (SANDAG)
and to the COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS which would
require mandatory curbside citywide to be on-line
by January 1992, or the cities' trash would have
stiff penalties imposed at the landfill site. It
would be very difficult to meet this date and to
escape the imposition of those penalties. This
would also present the difficult (but not unsolv-
able) problems of scheduling trash and recycling
services, routes, etc.
NATIONAL CITY RATE SCHEDULE
7-1-91
BOX TYPE REFUSE SERVICE
CURRENT PROPOSED
NUMBER COLLECTION YARDS PER MONTHLY MONTHLY
BINS FREQUENCY MONTH RATE RATE
1 1 13 54.25 62.65
1 2 26 87.30 100.85
1 3 39 120.35 139.00
1 4 52 153.40 177.20
1 5 65 186.50 215.40
1 6 78 219.50 253.50
1 7 91 271.75 313.85
2 1 26 110.20 127.30
2 2 52 174.00 200.95
2 3 78 238.95 276.00
2 4 104 306.80 354.35
2 5 130 355.55 410.65
2 6 156 404.85 467.60
2 7 182 475.60 549.30
3 1 39 116.25 134.25
3 2 78 255.20 294.75
3 3 117 349.15 403.25
3 4 156 405.15 467.95
3 5 195 523.75 604.95
3 6 234 630.45 728.15
3 7 273 777.80 898.35
4 1 52 197.20 227.75
4 2 104 321.30 371.10
4 3 156 445.75 514.85
4 4 208 522.00 602.90
4 5 260 673.95 778.40
4 6 312 759.20 876.85
4 7 364 999.90 1154.90
5 1 65 234.30 270.60
5 2 130 388.60 448.85
5 3 195 543.15 627.35
5 4 260 667.00 770.40
5 5 325 801.00 925.15
5 6 390 966.85 1116.70
5 7 455 1186.10 1369.95
6 1 78 271.15 313.15
6 2 156 455.90 526.55
6 3 234 640.60 739.90
6 4 312 737.20 851.45
6 5 390 892.60 1030.95
6 6 468 1086.35 1254.75
6 7 546 1336.00 1543.10
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE September 25, 1990
ITEM TITLE REQUEST FOR RATE INCREASE FOR TRASH SERVICE
EXPLANATION
The terms of the contract with EDCO provide for periodic
rate increases. Based upon numerous discussions and the
Workshop of 9/18/90, the contractor has submitted a letter
(EDCO letter of 9/19/90 attached) requesting a rate change
for 10/1/90, recommending a deferral of some elements of new
services desired by the city, and proposing a future method
of determining rate changes.
The rate change proposed is an approximate 20% rate increase
to single-family units from $7.25 to $8.75 per month; and an
approximate 16% increase in commercial services.
The deferral of citywide curbside recycling in favor of a
pilot program, and the deferral of an increase in the
franchise fee has reduced the rate changes from those
originally submitted. Staff agrees with the deferral of
these two programs.
The proposed use of the local urban consumer price index as
a vehicle for determining future rate increases appears
acceptable, with the % change in rate being equal to the %
change in index, and with a maximum 6% cap.
The further proposal to treat tipping fee changes as "pass -
through" costs has merit. The County has advised that the
fees will continue to rise; the amount and timing of
increases are not known. Treating this as a "pass -through"
cost with the rate increase being only for tipping fee
increases and with the timing being concurrent, the element
of risk on both sides is reduced to zero. Approval is recom-
mended.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the rates proposed, to be effective October 1, 1990.
Approve the bulky item pickup and refrigerator door programs
to start October 1, 1990. Approve the second citywide
cleanup to be in October 1990. Approve the pilot recycling
program to start October 1990. Approve citywide curbside
recycling to start July 1991. Approve theuse of the CPI to
establish new rates in October 1991 and thereafter approve
increasing the franchise fee to 5% on October 1, 1992, and
1% per year thereafter; and approve the treating of County
landfill tipping fee increases as a pass -through cost.
RPORI O
6670 Federal Boulevards
i ° " Lermon Grove; California 92045 (6.19) 287-7555]
May 15, 1991
City of National City
1243 National Ave.
National City, CA 92050
Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council:
On July 1, 1991 the County of San Diego is raising the disposal
site fee from $18.00 to $23.00 per ton, a 28% increase.
Also, after successful completion of a 9 month pilot residential
curbside recycling program, we plan to start the city wide program on
that same date.
During last years negotiations we agreed to review rates on
October 1st each year. However, because the county adjusts disposal
fees annually on July 1st, it appears the refuse rates would be
artificially high if we delayed for three months the pass through of
additional landfill fees and recycling costs. For this reason we are
recommending rates be adjusted annually on July 1st instead of October.
Attached is the accountants rate review. The report recommends a
$1.36 increase in single family dwellings, including recycling service
and a similar percentage in commercial charges.
Please approve the attached proposed rate schedules to be
effective July 1, 1991.
Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Please be
aware of our continuing commitment to the highest quality customer
service at the lowest possible rates.
Respectfully,
EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION
dba/National City Rubbish
Edward Burr
President
NATIONAL CITY RATE SCHEDULE
7-1-91
RUBBISH AND GARBAGE (COMMERCIAL CURRENT PROPOSED
MRATELY MONTHLY
AND INDUSTRIAL ESTABLISHMENTS)
RATE RATE
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
One time per week -per month 10.25 11.85
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Two times per week -per month 16.30 18.85
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Three times per week -per month 21.00 24.25
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Four times per week -per month 25.95 29.95
Up to (2) 40 gallon containers
Daily (six days/Monday thru
Saturday)
Additional or unusual accumulation
of rubbish (per cubic yard)
33.90 39.15
6.15 7.10
NATIONAL CITY RATE SCHEDULE
7-1-91
BOX TYPE REFUSE SERVICE
CURRENT PROPOSED
NUMBER COLLECTION YARDS PER MONTHLY MONTHLY
BINS FREQUENCY MONTH RATE RATE
1 1 13 54.25 62.65
1 2 26 87.30 100.85
1 3 39 120.35 139.00
1 4 52 153.40 177.20
1 5 65 186.50 215.40
1 6 78 219.50 253.50
1 7 91 271.75 313.85
2 1 26 110.20 127.30
2 2 52 174.00 200.95
2 3 78 238.95 276.00
2 4 104 306.80 354.35
2 5 130 355.55 410.65
2 6 156 404.85 467.60
2 7 182 475.60 549.30
3 1 39 116.25 134.25
3 2 78 255.20 294.75
3 3 117 349.15 403.25
3 4 156 405.15 467.95
3 5 195 523.75 604.95
3 6 234 630.45 728.15
3 7 273 777.80 898.35
4 1 52 197.20 227.75
4 2 104 321.30 371.10
4 3 156 445.75 514.85
4 4 208 522.00 602.90
4 5 260 673.95 778.40
4 6 312 759.20 876.85
4 7 364 999.90 1154.90
5 1 65 234.30 270.60
5 2 130 388.60 448.85
5 3 195 543.15 627.35
5 4 260 667.00 770.40
5 5 325 801.00 925.15
5 6 390 966.85 1116.70
5 7 455 1186.10 1369.95
6 1 78 271.15 313.15
6 2 156 455.90 526.55
6 3 234 640.60 739.90
6 4 312 737.20 851.45
6 5 390 892.60 1030.95
6 6 468 1086.35 1254.75
6 7 546 1336.00 1543.10
EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION
RATE REVIEW FOR
THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
APRIL 29, 1991
10920 Wilshire Boulevard
Suite 1200
`.os Angeles
.;alifornia 90024
(213) 208-1200
Member:
American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants
California Society of
Certified Public Accountants
Private Companies Practice
Section, AICPA, Division
for CPA Firms
Alder,
Green
& Hasson
REPORT IN CONNECTION WITH RATE REVIEW
Board of Directors
Edco Disposal Corporation
Certified Public Accountants
At your request, we have applied the procedures enumerated below to the information provided related
to the contract with the City of National City. These procedures, which were agreed upon by Edco
Disposal Corporation, were performed solely to assist you in preparing a Rate Review for the City of
National City. This report is intended solely for your information and for those involved in the rate
making process for the City of National City contract; and should not be used for any other purpose.
We performed the following agreed -upon procedures, the results of which are attached:
1. We computed the Consumer Price Index increase required at both July 1, 1991 and October
1, 1991.
2. We computed the rate increase required for the Dump Fee increase by the County of San Diego
effective July 1, 1991. Additionally we evaluated the required recovery amount in the event
Edco is unable to pass -through this increase until October 1, 1991.
3. We computed the cost of special services and the corresponding rate requirement for the dump
fee increase based on information provided by management.
4. We assembled the information for recycling provided by management and integrated it into the
computation of the rate adjustment.
Because the above procedures do not constitute an audit conducted in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards, we do not express an opinion on any of the accounts or items referred
to above. In connection with the procedures referred to above, no matters came to our attention that
caused us to believe that the specified accounts or items should be adjusted. Had we performed
additional procedures or had we conducted an audit of the financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted auditing standards, matters might have come to our attention that would have been
reported to you. This report relates only to the accounts and items specified above and does not
extend to any financial statements of Edco Disposal Corporation taken as a whole.
1
ALDER, GREEN & HASSON
April 29, 1991
Los Angeles, California
EDCO/NATIONAL CITY
COMPUTATION OF RATE ADJUSTMENT
Under the terms of the Collection of Rubbish and Trash contract between the City of National City and
Edco Disposal Corporation, dated September 25, 1990; applications for rate changes are to be
submitted on an annual basis with effective dates of October 1. Due to the planned implementation
of a citywide Curbside Recycling Program effective July 1, 1991, and a 27.7% increase in dumping
fees also effective July 1, 1991, we are submitting our application for rate adjustment with both July
1, 1991 and October 1, 1991 effective dates.
Analysis of impact of Rote Increase
on Rates Effective July 1, 1991
% of 1891
Forecasted
_ Revenue Residential Commercial
Current Existing Rate S 8.75 $ 54.25
Consumer Price index Increase
(Nine Months) (Note 1) 3.83 .33 2.08
Dump Fee increase 8.30 .73 4.50
Reversal of Prior Unrecovered
Dump, Net (3.88) (.34) (2.11)
TOTAL REFUSE RATE
Special Services
Recycling Program (Proportionate
Sharing Between Residential and
Commercial)
TOTAL COMBINED RATE
Alternate: Recycling Program
(Residential Rate Only)
TOTAL COMBINED RATE
8.25
1.37
5.90
9.47 58.72
. 12 .75
. 52
3.20
15.52
10.11 9 82.67
18.00
1.66
Fib
28.62
11.25 9 59.47
Note 1: The Consumer Price Index for the San Diego County area was 5.0% on April 1991,
The increase shown above is 9/12 of the current Consumer Price Index plus a provision
for the 2% franchise fee.
See Report in Connection with Rate Review
-2•
EDCO/NATIONAL CITY
COMPUTATION OF RATE ADJUSTMENT
Analysis of Impact of Rate Increase
on Rates Effective October 1. 1981
% of 1991
Forecasted
Revenue Residential Commercial
Current Existing Rate $ 8.75 $ 54.25
Consumer Price Index Increase
(Twelve Months) (Note 1) 5.10 .46 2.77
Dump Fee Increase 8.30 .73 4.60
Unrecovered Dump 2.07 .18 1.12
Reversal of Prior Unrecovered
Dump, Net r (6.14) (.46) (2.81)
M
TOTAL REFUSE RATE 10.33 9.68 69.83
Special Services 2.11 .18 1.14
Recycling Program (Proportionate
Sharing Between Residential and
Commercial)
Unrecovered Recycling
5.90
1.48
TOTAL COMBINED RATE 19.82
Alternate: Recycling Program
(Residential Rate Only,
Including $0.42 Unrecovered)
Note 1:
TOTAL COMBINED RATE
.52
3.20
.13 .80
10.49 $ 84.97
23.90
2.09
36.34
11.93 $ 80.97
The Consumer Price Index for the San Diego County area was 6.0% in April 1991.
The increase shown above includes a provision for the 2% franchise fee.
See Report in Connection with Rate Review
-3-
EDCO/NATIONAL CITY
ANALYSIS OF COMPUTATION OF RATE INCREASE
Edco received an increase in rate effective October 1, 1990 to cover the dump fee increase effective
July 1, 1990 and an annual Consumer Price Index factor. The next scheduled application for rate
adjustment is for October 1, 1991. Effective July 1, 1991 the County of San Diego dump fees will
increase by 27.7%. In addition, the Citywide Curbside Recycling Program will commence on that date.
We have computed the rate increases required effective both July 1, 1991 and October 1, 1991 for
comparison purposes. Both methods show in the individual item increase as effective July 1. The
October method however, includes "Unrecovered" provisions providing for "catch -ups" for the three
month period (July through September) to which Edco was subject to the higher costs but received
no additional revenue. These unrecovered amounts are effective for a twelve month period. The
October 1990 rate increase included a similar provision to reflect the July 1990 dump increase. This
provision is shown as being reversed effective October (July method reversal is reduced due to
premature reversal). In addition, the July method only has a Consumer Price Index increase for 9
months as the previous increase was in October 1990. All cost increases have been grossed up to
reflect the 2% franchise fee and are based on forecasted fiscal 1991 revenues.
REGULAR DUMP FEE INCREASE
Current Dump Rate
New Dump Rate
$ 18/ton
23/ton
Increase Percent 27.7%
Forecasted 1991 Total Dump Costs
Forecasted 1992 Dump Costs Plus
Franchise Fee
$ 651,126
848,973
Increase Amount $ 197,847
Percent of 1991 Forecasted
Revenue Increase ($2,386,000) 8.30%
UNRECOVERED DUMP FEES
Unrecovered Dump fees are equivalent to three months of the net increase to be recouped over a
twelve month period:
Regular Dump Fee Increase
Three Months of Increase
$ 197,848
49,462
Percent of 1991 Forecasted
Revenue ($2,386,000)
See Report in Connection with Rate Review
-4-
EDCO/NATIONAL CITY
ANALYSIS OF COMPUTATION OF RATE INCREASE
PRIOR UNRECOVERED DUMP
Included in the October 1980 rate increase was a provision for unrecovered dump fees for the period
July 1990 through September 1990; to be recovered over a twelve month period. This provision is
fully reversed effective October 1991. For July 1991 the reversal 1s partial to allow the remaining 3
months to be respread over the next twelve month period.
Residential Commercial
October Effective Date
Full Prior unrecovered Dump $ .45 $ 2.81
July Effective Date
Uncollected Portion (One -Fourth) .11 .70
NET JULY REVERSAL
SPECIAL SERVICES
$ .34 $ 2.11
Included in the current existing rate is the cost recovery for dump fees for special services (street litter
cans, bin service at civic containers, etc.). The requested Increases are to cover the dump fee increase
only and are calculated as 1.37% of the current existing rate for July and 2.11 % for October. This
Increase also covers the additional dump fee Increase caused by the County of San Diego changing
dump fees on roll -off bodies from a flat rate to a per -ton charge. Accordingly, the rate provided does
not fully support the special services.
See Report in Connection with Rate Review
-5-
EDCO/NATIONAL CITY
ANALYSIS OF COMPUTATION OF RATE INCREASE
RECYCLING PROGRAM
The following are the anticipated costs and revenues for the citywide curbside recycling program to
commence on July 1, 1991:
OPERATING EXPENSES:
Labor $ 69,506
Labor Fringe 29,753
Equipment 46,539
Other Direct 17,769
Processing 21,374
Administrative 4,712
Other 6,324
Less: Dump Fee Savings 116.387)
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 179,590
REVENUES:
Sale of Recyclables 41.858
NET COST 137.732
NET COST PLUS FRANCHISE FEE $ 140.542
PERCENT OF 1991 FORECASTED
REVENUE REQUIRED ($2,386,000) 5.90%
THREE MONTHS UNRECOVERED RECYCLING COST:
UNRECOVERED PORTION
(OCTOBER ONLY) $ 35.136
PERCENT OF 1991 FORECASTED
REVENUE REQUIRED ($2,386, 0001 1.48 %
See Report in Connection with Rate Review
-6-
ITEM
830 PILOT
NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR
Old newspapers 4.75 3.45 2.89T 2.89 3.47 3.52
Glass 1.66 1.27 1.06 1.06 .92 1.08
Clear ( .62) ( .64)
2-color ( .30) ( .44)
Aluminum .21 .085 .09 .06 .01 .02
Tin .12 .145 .15 .11 .13 .15
Mixed Paper 1.7 1.50 1.09 .97 1.05 1.22
Plastics .15 .21 .22 .22 .27 .27
PET ( .05) ( .07) ( .07) ( .07) ( .06) ( .06)
HDPE ( .10) ( .14) ( .15) ( .15) ( .21) ( .21)
TOTAL TONNAGE
8.59 6.66
5.59 5.31
5.85 6.26
LBS/HOUSE/SET OUT 14.52 16.05 14.07 13.3 15.0 15.05
SET OUT RATE 33% 24% 23% 22% 22% 23%
PARTICIPATION RATE 49% 36% 34% 33% 33% 34%
Attachment I
RECYCLERSiAVE AN IMPAC'r!
Curbside recycling is saving resources and landfill space, see the chart below for statistics on your city's recycling efforts in
1990. If you're not participating in your area's curbside recycling program you're throwing away valuable resources, and
wasting landfill space, call 287-5612 to find out how you can participate!
TIME SPAN
TOTAL
HOMES
SERVED
AV. MONTHLY
PARTICIPATION
*
CORONA DO NATIONAL
CITY
12 MONTHS 3 MONTHS
LA MESA
LEMON
GROVE
rv!^
12, MONTHS 12 MONTHS
700 830 11500 7,000
79.5%
39%
.5% 46%
SANTEE ENVIRONMENTAL
roiLo� �4v0
SAVINGS
8 MONTHS
3,500
64%
ALUMINUM
TIN
(BI-METAL CANS)
GLASS
PET (1)
HDPE (2)
NEWSPAPER
MIXED PAPER
TOTAL
2.42 TONS .345 TONS 31.03' TONS 9.19 TONS- 6.17 TONS
3.24 .355 48.31 13.81 9.66
45.85 3.72 457.76 118.84 80.79
.75 .14 12.86 4.50 3.16
1.53 .27 25.92 9.78 6.83
94.62 9.77 1319.71 366.98 232.66
53.40 4.19 674.77 157.11 103.26
201.81
18.79
2570.36 680.21
*Rate plus or minus 5.5% (1) Polyethylene Terephthalate (2) High Density Polyethylene
442.53
13,916,626
Kilowatt
hours
of electricity
51,280
trees
9,954`cubic'
yards of
landfill
space
KEEP
RECYCLING!
Ali figures
for year 1990
THE COSTS
OF OUR WASTE
Many citizens have contacted San
Diego Recycling regarding the costs of
recycling and waste disposal. Some
people feel that because they are now
cutting back on the amount of trash they
dispose of, and since recyclables can
be sold, recycling should be free.
However, as with any new program,
there are many start-up costs, such as
purchasing recycling trucks and bins;
hiring of drivers and other necessary
staff: and preparation of the processing
center. Moreover. there are the ongoing
costs of collection of materials; clean-
ing, sorting, and processing of
recyciables; and operational overhead.
The revenue generated from the
recyclables collected do not cover
these ongoing operational costs at the
present time. As many of you are aware
because of the recent start-up of so
many recycling programs. additional
volumes of recyclable materials are
being marketed, thus lowering the price
that recycling processors, such as SDR,
receive for their materials. As manufac-
turers and consumers begin to use
more products made from recycled
materials, the markets should improve.
Disposal costs are also rising. Landfill
tipping fees (disposal fees) have risen
significantly over the past year, and will
continue to rise as landfills begin to
reach capacity and new disposal sites
must be found. Disposal cost fees are
becoming a larger component of
EDCO's operating cost. Rising inflation
has also impacted the costs of waste
disposal and recycling through higher
labor, fuel, insurance, and maintenance
costs.
Thus. disposing of trash or collecting
and processing recyclables is expen-
sive, and as in any industry, these costs
must be passed down to the consumer.
In the long run, recycling may be more
cost effective, since sales of recyclables
do off -set some of the costs, but fees for
both services may always be neces-
sary. Also, recycling will lower the
amount of waste going to landfills, thus
extending the life of the landfill and
helping to keep the long term costs of
disposal lower.
The benefits of recycling, including
reducing our waste disposal needs
(and thus saving landfill space), savings
in resources (including energy and
water), and overall reduction in water,
air, and land pollution (through reuse of
recycled resources) are not always
apparent to the resident recyceer, but
are nonetheless very important when
thinking about the costs and benefits of
recycling. These benefits may not be
reflected in the immediate costs of
recycling programs or waste disposal
services, but will be beneficial to all of
us in the future. rig
-3-
MONTHLY REFUSE AND RECYCLING RATES
OF INCORPORATED CITIES
EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 1991
RES. RECY. RES. MAIN REFUSE FRANCHISE COMM.
CITY RATE FEE TOTAL CONTRACTOR RECYCLER FEE BIN RATE
CARLSBAD 8.60 1.00 9.60 COAST LIBERTY RECYCLING 5% 58.20
CHULA VISTA 9.46 1.10 10.56 LAIDLAW LAIDLAW 7% 53.20
DEL MAR 9.90 0.78 10.68 COAST SOLANA RECYCLERS 5% 67.37
EL CAJON 8.80 (C) 8.80 UNIVERSAL SEE FOOTNOTE (C) 3% 52.00
ENCINITAS 9.80 0.78 10.58 COAST/MASHBURN SOLANA RECYCLERS 5% 55.85
ESCONDIDO 7.54 1.43 8.97 ESCONDIDO DSP ESCONCICO DSP 10% 49.38
IMPERIAL BCH 9.60 1.05 10.65 LAIDLAW LAIDLAW (D) 43.20
LA MESA 9.34 1.61 10.95 EDCO SAN DIEGO RECY. 4% 58.40
LEMON GROVE 8.61 1.14 9.75 EDCO SAN DIEGO RECY. 5.5% (A) 56.45
PROPOSED 10.12 1.18 11.30 EDCO SAN DIEGO RECY. 5.5% (A) 65.75
NAT'L CITY 8.75 0.00 8.75 EDCO SAN DIEGO RECY. 2% 54.25
OCEANSIDE 11.80 0.00 11.80 OCEANSIDE DSP OCEANSIDE DSP N/A 37.99
POWAY 12.80 0.00 12.80 LAIDLAW/MASHBURN NONE (B)
SAN MARCOS 8.70 1.26 9.96 MASHBURN MASHBURN 5% 55.90
SOLANA BEACH 9.55 0.78 10.33 COAST/MASHBURN SOLANA RECYCLERS (B) 55.00
VISTA 8.70 0.81 9.51 VISTA SANI. VISTA SANI. 5% 56.20
NOTE: THESE RATES DO NOT INCLUDE THE UP-COMMING DISPOSAL FEE INCREASE.
(A) THE FRANCHISE FEE IS CURRENTLY 5.5% BUT IT INCREASES BY 1/2% PER YEAR UP TO A CEILING
OF 10%.
(B) FRANCHISE FEE IS BASED ON $1,000 PLUS $2.00 MULTIPLIED TIMES THE CUSTOMER BASE, PER YEAR
(C) RECYCLING BY UNIVERSAL TO BEGIN 7/01/91 AT FEE OF $1.48.
(D) FRANCHISE FEE IS 49,559.55/MONTH
_ap .ctp I a 3 h- YPSs/ a wahe (_S
cdcy-Us v'PC ne - / r rc1
cashes) 4.1 dry e.rs / ie-c9 / I T.' V
e 6(.10 he..5 / 3 wcL4e1 h er.�-fer5 1 a. C' ccr ffi 1cz
1,-• -ciU l 0 1L r-e ccrveito-f6 r5 / I +o Je /
T1/ / 1 rij l Tpi� h t,Jc4ShP t'_
I / awn mdtle.r /-1_ 4 b(-e / (0 Cha ire
nicd-+-r 6 / 3 wos/ j5 / t dry -or
1 i V/ 3 refric�
I Ousher / -1-0;ie.f / a evue;Lp,c
Ke- -)4 l 1dry Pr / 1 bre,
kaL1-90
1 d re sse r / 3 m ck yos 7 1 hoy Spri
I ref,- 1" I ►-"r1,e?0r / I Su.)inq /
(1 o C.ce►-4 _
Y11614-4-t-e S5 / 1 i a' Crr.ir t P0c10
/ 1 rii >7 v.< yaks h0, r
3 t.c>r,/vi e 's / bo ers
a •5 Li / 1 rlryor/
-a -k-/i Ye ;s f R o oc ie hes
1 ,nL 1 -oie
of 62,v10 h es / a LAsher,S
ix,e
re c r,i 5 / i C' Ct rn pe hQ / J
1 rn G -res ,S
Ake 45 p-5 _Su_ iyi ts'y-L+e-rnS % kPr
q-qo 3 a cou l- p / 1 rPc-c /
1 dcyey / (Wcsher
1-1-ctb1-2 7 '`{ S o--cs4 / 1 Preez�°
I c a b i n -e..i- / 1► -4-F}(eS S/ 1 coosiu
-q 1 5 q ma- re5 / 1 )>c 'r i / 1 5-kwe
Ye riq. / 1 (try())
-19-9 - I .6-Awe / l k- m S -)-'Ye e_/ l re-vi
�9 EoX 5eri(1 7 /r3`ma`1-'Q5S
/ ) (✓aShi / / dryer. / oueA,
c hai r5 / / tda+er )-)4)(-1-e17-
-ac0-q I 1 rDlr C arpQi / 3 eor.teheS /
1 hit, r / a rnc-{tress
9 / / / x`rea 5 -M-e e /Q ,-1-1-res
I b1 Cye l� / 1 roll ('ra✓ref / 1 �1-ab��
f
T- v / 1 w 1 r1q S� f
-q-9l
.0 h i S V
l ,Lrte✓ 1-Qctier'1p Cab i ne1S
v-oil Cetrpof v /a y
tv1G f-fres,S S e ha i rs / 1 re Piq
.1 Lc)o 1 mael1! ae / t JQacl boar(
wale r • heoce rS
( c.J a-1•P r h o cz-W r/
3-01-91
1c.-
5 - (,t_6)es/ C he r
YN
9
/ 3 C',ou(+, h P,S /tt)(trlen _hae
a A-;ces /5dryers/troll oco,pP-i
3�)�Q-ctl
aclr -
1
(A-)cr ]/e6ti-ex,5 / �a Cn(.c0 h eS
I osh mach; ne/er�
1 k / rm,,-N-1E: % g rk.temc
no
no pre (,tps-
ry-Icci-i-(e_c,s CN hqa rollS
Ct rOP- / I anx )0(1;75 / I �v�imrll i n(
p P n 1 / ( T. �/. / 1 t,L i t .so
G7ccfe Pt f rPi ('r5r rin'IS
s o. / 5 C hr, i / r -cc(e.
curlc(4t -Qs- / / 307( 5prI nc
by i%:L t c.
NATIONAL CITY RATE SCHEDULE
7-1-91
RUBBISH AND GARBAGE
CURRENT PROPOSED
MONTHLY MONTHLY
RATE RATE
1. RESIDENTIAL
Per month residential single family
properties. 8.75 10.10
For the second and for each additional
residential unit in multiple dwellings
which do not exceed four units 6.60 7.60
2. TRAILER PARKS AND MOTELS (5.00 MINIMUM)
One time per week, per unit, per month 6.20 7.15
3. APARTMENT HOUSES (NO MINIMUM)
One time per week, per unit, per month 6.15 7.10
4. SENIOR CITIZEN -RESIDENTIAL
Per month 7.10 8.20
City of National City, California
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
MEETING DATE October 22, 1991
AGENDA ITEM NO, 13
ITEM TITLE
PERIODIC REPORT OF EDCO ACTIVITIES
PREPARED BY C. R. Williams, Jr DEPARTMENT Public Works
EXPLANATION
The attached report from EDCO (San Diego Recycling Company) provides the
September status of the major items included in the most recent contract
revision.
J
Environmental Review X N/A
Financial Statement
N/A
Account No. N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
File.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
N/A
ATTACHMENTS (Listed Below)
Resolution No. N/A
San Diego Recycling Co. letter of October 11, 1991.
A-200 (Rev. 9/80)
EAN DIEGO REC%LINGCO.
6700 Federal Blvd. • Lemon Grove • CA 91945 •.,(619) 28' 561rib Fax (619) 287-5242
Mr. Curt Williams
Public Works Director
City of National City
2100 Hoover Ave.
National City, CA 92050
RE: Status Update
Dear Mr. Williams:
flUtI
October 11, 1991
Based upon the discussions of the meeting held at EDCO on 10-3-91,
the following information is provided.
RECYCLING REPORT
1. TONNAGE: Actual Projected Actual Projected
Tons Tons Revenue Revenue
September 63 59 $3129 $3488
The actual tons exceeded the projections, however, the actual
revenue was lower than projected. This can most likely be
attributed to the low scrap value of glass, which is much lower
than our projections anticipated.
2. PARTICIPATION
September
34% set out rate 51-61% participation rate
This is a very stable rate of participation for a 2-3 month old
program. This rate should gradually increase over the next few
months.
3. PUBLICITY
To date there has been articles and an advertisement in the local
newspaper and an insert in the latest EDCO billing. Theses
activities have resulted in a higher level of awareness of the
program. Future publicity efforts include contacting the local
schools to set up presentations, and the local service clubs.
4. MULTI FAMILY
This program is currently scheduled to begin implementation in
July of 1992 and should be completed in a 4-6 month time frame.
Any rate relating to the multi family program will be established
and presented to council in April.
Recycled Paper, Naturally
(10% postconsumer, 40% preconsumer)
printed with environmentally
conscious soy -based ink.
AN EDCO DISPOSAL CORPORATION COMPANY
J
s
Mr. Curt Williams
October 11, 1991
Page 2
5. COMMERCIAL
This program has already begun to be implemented on a voluntary
basis and will continue in this manner. Mandatory commercial
recycling will be at a later date, but now later than July 1993.
6. BULKY ITEMS
From October 1990 - September 1991 a total of 55.5 tons of bulky
items have been collected. The January issue of the newsletter
will discuss the bulky item program.
7. CLEAN UPS
The May 1991 clean up resulted in 48 loads being delivered to the
landfill which is equivalent to 328 tons of material. The next
clean up is set for 11-16-91.
Submitted by,
Coy Smith
Executive Director
TYPE OF INSURANCE
A001:1).
PRODUCER
Solid Waste Ins. Mgrs.
P.O. Box 7072
Pasadena, CA. 91109
INSURED
Edco Disposal Corp. Inc.
Etal
6670 Federal Boulevard
Lemon Grove
MAWS
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
Ca 92045
LE BATE (MMfbb/YY)
10/29/91
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
COMPANY A
LETTER
COMPANY B
LETTER
COMPANY `.
LETTER
COMPANY D
LETTER
COMPANY E
LETTER
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
CALIFORNIA INS CO (IND)
CALIFORNIA INS CO (IND)
CALIFORNIA INS CO (IND)
CO
1LTR'
A: GENERAL LIABILITY
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
CLAIMS MADE. X ! OCCUR.
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT.
B AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
X ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
X HIRED AUTOS
X NON -OWNED AUTOS
GARAGE LIABILITY
EXCESS LIABILITY
UMBRELLA FORM
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
E, OTHER
PHYSICAL DAMAGE
POLICY NUMBER
OR9591681
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION'.
DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY)
10/15/91 10/15/92
0R9591681 10/15/91
JE01672/ 0226
HXL269577
10/15/92
10/1P/91 i8 /155/92
0R959168 1 10/15/91 10/15/92
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
RE: RUBBISH HAULING
ENDORSMENT CG20101185 ATTACHED
T.
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD.
NATIONAL CITY, CA. 92050
ACORA 25-S (1 f/$9)
ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2000
PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $ 1 0 00
PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $ 10 00
EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1 000
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) $ 50
MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $ 5
COMBINED
SINGLE $
LIMIT
BODILY
INJURY $
(Per person)
BODILY
INJURY $
(Per accident)
PROPERTY $
DAMAGE
1000
EACH AGGREGATE
OCCURRENCE
STATUTORY
$ (EACH ACCIDENT)
$ (DISEASE —POLICY LIMIT)
(DISEASE —EACH EMPLOVEEi
$1,000 DED. COMP
$1,000 DED. COLL
At4PE,t1%ATN
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL aRIMILVOIMPPOR
MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
n .�
n
POLICY NUMBER:
OR9591681
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
THIS ENDORSEMENT CHANGES THE POLICY. PLEASE READ IT CAREFULLY.
ADDITIONAL INSURED - OWNERS, LESSEES OR
CONTRACTORS (FORM B)
This endorsement modifiesinsurance provided under the following:
COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY COVERAGE PART.
SCHEDULE
Name of Person or Organization: RUBBISH HAULING
CITY OF NATIONAL CITY
AND ITS OFFICERS, AGENTS,
AND EMPLOYEES AS ADDITIONAL
INSURED,
(If no entry appears above, information required to complete this endorsement will be shown in the Declarations
as applicable to this endorsement.)
WHO IS AN INSURED (Section II) is amended to include as an insured the person or organization shown in the
Schedule, but only with respect to liability arising out of "your work" for that insured by or for you.
"IT IS FURTHER AGREED THAT SUCH INSURANCE AS IS AFFORDED BY THIS
POLICY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ADDITIONAL INSURED SHOWN ABOVE SHALL
BE PRIMARY INSURANCE, BUT ONLY AS RESPECTS ANY CLAIMS, LOSS OR
LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF THE OPERATONS OF THE NAMED INSURED SHALL
BE NON-CONTRIBUTING.
CG 20 10 11 85 Copyright, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 1984 ❑
EDCO Disposal Corporation
Rialto Services, Inc.
A-1_Disposal.-Company
La Mesa Disposal Service
Waste Transporting Company
San Diego Refuse Company
San Diego Recycling
Thomas & Sons Disposal
Fallbrook Refuse Service
National City Rubbish Service
Park Disposal
Signal Hill Disposal
S.E.J. Trucking, Inc.
Litter Box Containers
Edward G. Burr & Sandra L. Burr
(as respects those covered locations owned by them)
Dependable Garbage Service
Reliable Disposal Service
Tri-County Disposal
Sanco Equipment Corporation
°lid Waste Ins. Mgrs.
P.O. Box 7072
Pasadena, CA. 91109
INSURED
Edco Disposal
Workers Compensation
6670 Federal Boulevard
Lemon Grove Ca 92045
C 074 ;�
ISSUE DATE (MM/DD/YY)
12/16/91
NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND,
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS
EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW
COMPANY A
LETTER
COMPANY B
LETTER
COMPANY `.
LETTER
COMPANY D
LETTER
COMPANY E
LETTER
COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEP
RECEIVED
JAN a 3 1992
U n i c a r e NATIONAL CITY, CALIF.
BCO
LTR
y..
GENERAL LIABILITY
1 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY
IVEaA ;� ;
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD
INDICATED, NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS,
EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION
DATE (MM/DD/YY) DATE (MM/DD/YY)
TYPE OF INSURANCE
CLAIMS MADE OCCUR.
OWNER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT.
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
ANY AUTO
ALL OWNED AUTOS
SCHEDULED AUTOS
HIRED AUTOS
NON -OWNED AUTOS
GARAGE LIABILITY
EXCESS LIABILITY
OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
AND
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY
OTHER
POLICY NUMBER
UCA011863
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/SPECIAL ITEMS
RE: RUBBISH HAULING
ICAT HOLDER -
ITY OF NATIONAL CITY
1243 NATIONAL CITY BLVD.
NATUAL CITY, CA 92050
12/01/91
CANCELLAT
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO
MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE
LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR
LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE ANY, ITS AGENTS ORr E' 'ESENTATIVES.
12/01/92
ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS
GENERAL AGGREGATE $
PRODUCTS-COMP/OPS AGGREGATE $
PERSONAL & ADVERTISING INJURY $
EACH OCCURRENCE '$
FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire)
MEDICAL EXPENSE (Any one person) $
COMBINED
SINGLE $
LIMIT
BODILY
INJURY $
(Per person)
BODILY
INJURY $
(Per accident)'.
PROPERTY
DAMAGE
EACH
OCCURRENCE
$ $
STATUTORY
1000
1000
1000
AGGREGATE
(EACH ACCIDENT)
(DISEASE —POLICY LIMIT)
(DISEASE —EACH EMPLOYEE
10OAY NO ICE OF CANCELLATION 1N
THE EVENT Of NON PAYMENT PREMIUM
C. ACORD CORPORATION 19139
-411
•
Named Insured
EDCO Disposal Corporation
Rialto Services, Inc.
A-1 Disposal Company
La Mesa Disposal Service
Waste Transporting Company
San Diego Refuse Company
San Diego Recycling
Thomas & Sons Disposal
Fallbrook Refuse Service
National City Rubbish Service
Park Disposal
Signal Hill Disposal
Litter Box Containers
Dependable Garbage Service
Reliable Disposal Service
Tri-County Disposal
Sanco Equipment Corporation