Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 CON California Dept of Forestry (CAL FIRE) - Greenhouse Gas Reduction GrantAPPLICANT: PROJECT TITLE: GRANT AGREEMENT: State of California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Resource Management GRANT AGREEMENT National City National City Urban Forest Management Planning 8GG14423 PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS from Upon Approval through December 19, 2019. Under the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement, the applicant agrees to complete the project as described in the project description, and the State of California, acting through the Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection, agrees to fund the project up the total state grant amount indicated. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory - The City's Engineering and Public Works Department will utilize consulting ISA certified arborists inventory approximately 10,000 trees. Develop a Long Range UFMP. Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances. Improve City's Urban Forest Website and provide Web based tree maintenance scheduling interface for residents. Total State Grant not to exceed $ 250,285.00 (or project costs, whichever is less) *The Special and General Provisions attached are made a part of and incorporated into this Grant Agreement. STATE OF CALIFORNIA National City DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION By �It Applicant Signature of Authorized Representative Title Leslie Deese, City Manager Date October 6, 2015 Title: Duane Shintaku Deputy Director, Resource Management 3 Date / /'J CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING AMOUNT OF ESTIMATE FUNDING $ 250,285.00 GRANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 8GG14423 FUND 1016"Vs- Optional Line Item: 3540-004-3228 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) , ADJ. INCREASING ENCUMBRANCE erfe>P.VL $ 0.00 APPROPRIATION tc ti s . C—�as , . 1` tN �//i1•{WL G IIL''Idl� ADJ. DECREASING ENCUMBRANCE C'1`lie,2.✓x,�'WI.c,e FUNCT1I_ON^ / 1 'j 1 li as )�.e!tl.�F%Itliyl l�(.iil/jy�, ,,— UNENCUMBERED BALANCE $ 250,285.00 LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT 3540-' : -:1l ' (0 I ; CHAPTER 25 AN' STATUTE 2014 FISCAL YEAR 14/15 T.B.A. NO. B.R. NO. FY 14/15 INDEX 9520 OBJ. EXPEN D 418 PCA 96245 PROJECT/WORK PHASE VENDOR# 0000014027-00 I hereby certify upon my personal powledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance. A SIGNATURF CAL NTING OFFICER DATE GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF GRANT AGREEMENT I. RECITALS 1. This Agreement, is entered into between the State of California, by and through the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), hereinafter referred to as "STATE" and National City, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE". 2. The STATE herby grants to GRANTEE a sum (hereinafter referred to as "GRANT FUNDS") not to exceed two -hundred fifty -thousand, two -hundred eighty-five dollars ($250,285.00). 3. In addition to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the STATE and GRANTEE agree that the terms and conditions contained in the documents set forth below are hereby incorporated and made part of this agreement. a. Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Grants Urban and Community Forestry Grants Procedural Guide 2014/15 b. "Urban Forest Management for GHG Reduction" Grant Program Request for Proposals 2014/15 c. The submitted Application, Scope of Work, Budget Detail, GHG Emissions Reduction Methodology and Exhibits d. Addendum for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) Grant Projects II, SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. Recipients of GRANT FUNDS pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 4799.06-4799.12 shall abide by the provisions in this Agreement. This includes the requirement that work shall not commence prior to the execution of this Agreement by both parties. Any work started prior to the execution of this Agreement will not be eligible for funding under the terms of this Agreement. 2. As precedent to the State's obligation to provide funding, GRANTEE shall provide to the STATE for review and approval a detailed budget, specifications, and project description. Approval by the STATE of such plans and specifications, or any other approvals provided for in this Agreement, shall be for scope and quality of work, and shall not relieve GRANTEE of the obligation to carry out any other obligations required by this Agreement, in accordance with applicable law or any other standards ordinarily applied to such work or activity. GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 3. All informational products (e.g., data, studies, findings, management plans, manuals, photos, etc.) relating to California's natural environment produced with the use of GRANT FUNDS shall be available for public use. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Definitions a. The term "Agreement" means grant agreement number 8GG14423. b. The term "GRANT FUNDS" means the money provided by the STATE to the GRANTEE in this Agreement. c. The term "GRANTEE" means an applicant who has a signed Agreement for the award for GRANT FUNDS. d. The term "Other Sources of Funds" means all matching fund sources that are required or used to complete the Project beyond the GRANT FUNDS provided by this Agreement. e. The term "STATE" means the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). f. The term "Project" means the development or other activity described in the "Project Scope of Work". g• The term "Project Budget Detail" as used herein defines the approved budget plan. h. The term "Project Scope of Work" as used herein means the individual scope of work describing in detail the approved tasks. 2 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 2. Project Representatives The project representatives during the term of the agreement will be: STATE: CAL FIRE GRANTEE: National City Section/Unit: Urban and Community Forestry Section/Unit: N/A Attention: Lynnette Short Attention: Leslie Deese Mailing Address: 2249 Jamacha Road Mailing Address: 1243 National City Boulevard El Cajon, CA 92019 National City, CA 91950-4301 Phone Number: (619) 937-1410 Phone Number: (619) 336-4240 Email Address: Lynnette.Short©fire.ca.gov Email Address: Ideese©nationalcityca.gov Changes to the project representatives during the term of the agreement shall be made in writing. Notice shall be sent to the above representative for all notice provisions of this Agreement. 3. Project Execution a. Subject to the availability of grant monies, the STATE hereby grants to the GRANTEE a sum of money (GRANT FUNDS) not to exceed the amount stated on Section I. RECITALS, Paragraph 2 in consideration of and on condition that the sum be expended in carrying out the purposes as set forth in the description of the Project in this Agreement and its attachments and under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. b. GRANTEE shall assume any obligation to furnish any additional funds that may be necessary to complete the Project. Any amendment to the Project as set forth in the Application on file with the STATE must be submitted to the STATE for approval in writing. No amendment is allowed until written approval is given by the STATE. c. GRANTEE shall complete the Project in accordance with the time of Project performance set forth in this Agreement, unless an amendment has been approved and signed by the STATE under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Amendments must be requested in 3 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING advance and will be considered in the event of circumstances beyond the control of the GRANTEE, but in no event less than 90 days from the Agreement expiration date and in no event less than 60 days before the effective date of the amendment. Approval of amendment is at the STATE's discretion. d. GRANTEE certifies that the Project Scope of Work complies with all local, State, and federal laws and regulations. e. GRANTEE shall comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et. seq. Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.) and all other local, State, and federal environmental laws. A copy of the certified CEQA document must be provided to STATE before any GRANT FUNDS are made available for any Project activity that could directly impact the environment (e.g. cutting, piling or burning bush, masticating, dozer work, etc.). CEQA compliance shall be completed within one (1) year from start date of the Agreement. The start date is considered the date the last party signs the Agreement. GRANT FUNDS will be made available in advance of CEQA compliance for project activities that do not have the potential to cause a direct environmental impact (e.g. project planning, locating and marking property or project boundaries, contacting and signing up landowners, etc.). f. GRANTEE shall permit periodic site visits by representative(s) of the STATE to ensure program compliance and that work is in accordance with the approved Project Scope of Work, including a final inspection upon Project completion. g. GRANTEE, and the agents and employees of GRANTEE, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents, of the STATE. 4. Project Costs and Payment Documentation a. Payment by the STATE shall be made after receipt of an acceptable invoice and approval by a duly authorized representative of the STATE. GRANTEE shall submit an invoice for payment to the CAL FIRE Project Representative of the STATE. A final invoice shall be submitted no later than 30 days after completion, expiration, or termination of this Agreement. b. For services satisfactorily rendered, and upon receipt and approval of invoices for payment, the STATE agrees to compensate GRANTEE for actual expenditures incurred in accordance with the rates specified herein, 4 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING which is attached hereto, as Attachment 3 — Final Project Budget, and made a part of this Agreement. c. GRANTEE shall submit, in arrears, not more frequently than once a month, and no less than quarterly, an invoice to the STATE for costs paid by GRANTEE pursuant to this Agreement. Each invoice shall contain the following information: the Agreement number, the dates or time period during which the invoiced costs were incurred, expenditures for the current invoice and cumulative expenditures to date by major budget category (e.g., salaries, benefits, supplies, etc.), appropriate supporting documentation, project progress reports, and the signature of an authorized representative of GRANTEE as detailed in the Invoice Guidelines of the "Urban and Community Forestry Grants Procedural Guide 2014/2015." d. GRANT FUNDS in this Agreement have a limited period in which they must be expended. All GRANTEE expenditures must occur prior to the end of the Project performance period of this Agreement. e. Except as otherwise provided herein, GRANTEE shall expend GRANT FUNDS in the manner described in the Project Budget Detail approved by the STATE. The dollar amount of an item in the Project Budget Detail may be increased or decreased by up to ten percent (10%) of the budget item through reallocation of funds from another item or items, without approval by the STATE; however, GRANTEE shall notify the STATE in writing in project progress reports when any such reallocation is made, and shall identify both the item(s) being increased and those being decreased. Any increase or decrease of an item of more than ten percent (10%) of the budget item must be approved in writing by the STATE before any such increase or decrease is made. A formal approved amendment is required to increase the total amount of GRANT FUNDS. g• GRANTEE shall promptly submit any and all records at the time and in the form as the STATE may request. GRANTEE shall submit each invoice for payment to: California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection Urban and Community Forestry Attention: Lynnette Short 2249 Jamacha Road El Cajon, CA 92019 h. Notwithstanding any of the provisions stated within this Agreement, the STATE may at its discretion make advance payment to the GRANTEE, if GRANTEE is a Community -based private non-profit agency, upon written 5 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING request by the GRANTEE. Advance payment made by the STATE shall be subject to the circumstance and provisions below. Where hardship circumstances exist for the GRANTEE, the STATE will consider authorizing advance payments. The STATE will consider the following factors in determining whether a hardship situation exists: Modest reserves and potential cash flow problems of the GRANTEE including the need for advance funding in order to initiate a project. A justification for advance payment may include items such as the inability to pay for staff, supplies, administration expenses, and to secure contractors for Project work. The following guidelines will be applied to advance payments: • Multiple advance payments may be made to a GRANTEE over the life of a project. • No single advance payment shall exceed 25°I° of the total grant amount and must be spent on eligible costs within six months of the advance payment request. The balance of unspent advance payment funds not liquidated within the six month spending period will be billed for the return of the advanced funds to the STATE. The amount will be returned to the grant balance. • A request for advance payment must include the same level of expenditure detail and justification as a regular invoice. • All work under a previous advance payment must be fully liquidated via an invoice and supporting documentation and completed to the STATE's satisfaction before another advance payment will be made. • Any advance payment received by a GRANTEE and not used for project eligible costs shall be returned to CAL FIRE. • Advance payments must be deposited into an interest -bearing account. Any interest earned on advance payment funds must be accounted for and reported as program income used toward offsetting the project cost or returned to the STATE. 5. Budget Contingency Clause a. If STATE funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted for purposes of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Urban and Community Forestry Grant Program, the STATE shall have the option to either cancel this 6 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING Agreement with no liability occurring to the STATE, or if possible and desirable, offer an Agreement amendment to GRANTEE to reflect the reduced amount available for the Project. 6. Project Administration a. GRANTEE shall provide the STATE a written report showing total final Project expenditures and matching funds before work on the Project begins. GRANTEE must report to the STATE all sources of other funds for the Project. If this provision is deemed to be violated, the STATE will request an audit of GRANTEE and can delay the disbursement of funds until the matter is resolved. b. GRANTEE shall promptly submit written Project reports as the STATE may request throughout the term of this Agreement. c. GRANTEE shall submit a final accomplishment report, final invoice with associated supporting documentation, and copies of materials developed using GRANT FUNDS, including but not limited to plans, educational materials, etc. within 30 days of Project completion. 7. Financial Records a. GRANTEE shall retain all records described in Section 7(c) below for three (3) years after final payment by the STATE. In the case an audit occurs, all such records shall be retained for one (1) year from the date is audit is completed or the three (3) years, whichever date is later. b. GRANTEE shall maintain satisfactory financial accounts, documents, and records for the Project and make them available to the STATE for review during reasonable times. This includes the right to inspect and make copies of any books, records, or reports of GRANTEE pertaining to this Agreement or matters related thereto. c. GRANTEE shall keep such records as the STATE shall prescribe, including, but not limited to, records which fully disclose (a) the disposition of the proceeds of state funding assistance, (b) the total cost of the Project in connection with such assistance that is given or used, (c) the amount and nature of that portion of the Project cost supplied by other sources, and (d) any other such records as will facilitate an effective audit. All records shall be made available to the STATE, other State of California agency, or other entity as determined by the State of California for auditing purposes at reasonable times. d. GRANTEE shall use any generally accepted accounting system. 7 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 8. Project Termination a. This Agreement may be terminated by the STATE or GRANTEE upon 30- days written notice to the other party. b. If either party terminates the Agreement prior to the completion of the Project, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable measures to prevent further costs to the STATE under the Agreement and the STATE shall be responsible for any reasonable and non -cancelable obligations incurred by GRANTEE in the performance of this Agreement prior to the date of the notice to terminate, but only up to the undisbursed balance of funding authorized in this Agreement. c. Failure by GRANTEE to comply with the terms of this Agreement may be cause for suspension of all obligations of the STATE hereunder at the discretion of the STATE. d. Failure of GRANTEE to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall not be cause for the suspension of all obligations of the STATE hereunder if in the judgment of the STATE such failure was due to no fault of GRANTEE. At the discretion of the STATE, any amount required to settle at minimum cost any irrevocable obligations properly incurred shall be eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. e. Final payment to GRANTEE may not be made until the STATE determines the Project conforms substantially to this Agreement. 9. Hold Harmless a. GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify and hold the STATE, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, expense (including reasonable attorney's fees), or claims for injury or damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability, loss, expense, attorney's fees, or claims for injury or damages are caused by or result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of GRANTEE, its officers, agents, or employees. The duty of GRANTEE to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Civil Code Section 2778. This Agreement supersedes GRANTEE's right as a public entity to indemnity (see Government Code Section 895.2) and contribution (see Government Code Section 895.6) as set forth in Government Code Section 895.4. b. GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the STATE, its officers, agents, or employees for any liability resulting from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to this Agreement. 8 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING c. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create in the public or in any member of it rights as a third -party beneficiary under this Agreement. 10. Tort Claims FEDERAL: The United States shall be liable, to the extent allowed by the Federal Tort Claims Act 28 United States Code 2671-2680, for claims of personal injuries or property damage resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the United States while acting within the scope of his or her employment, arising out of this Agreement. STATE: The State of California shall be liable, to the extent allowed by law and subject to California Government Code, Title 1, Division 3.6, providing for the filing of tort claims against the State of California, for personal injuries or property damage resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of State of California employees while acting within the scope of his or her employment, arising out of this Agreement. 11. Nondiscrimination The State of California prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, marital status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. GRANTEE shall not discriminate against any person on any of these bases. 12. Incorporation The grant guidelines and the Project Scope of Work, Project Budget Detail and any subsequent amendments or modifications to the Project Scope of Work and Project Budget Detail approved in writing by the STATE are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement as though set forth in full in this Agreement. 13. Severability If any provision of this Agreement or the Project Scope of Work thereof is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are severable. 9 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 14. Waiver No term or provision hereof will be considered waived by either party, and no breach excused by either party, unless such waiver or consent is in writing and signed on behalf of the party against whom the waiver is asserted. No consent by either party to, or waiver of, a breach by either party, whether expressed or implied, will constitute consent to, waiver of, or excuse of any other, different, or subsequent breach by either party. 15. Assignment This Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or in part. 10 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING ADDENDUM — GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION PROJECTS I. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. Grant funds shall be used on projects with the primary goal of reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) and furthering the purposes of AB 32 (Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006), California's Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. 2. Grant funds shall be used on projects limited to specific activities as described in GHG Grants Procedural Guides. 3. Greenhouse gas reduction must be calculated using a GHG quantification methodology that has been developed or approved by ARB. 4. Grantee shall report project and benefits information when requested by the State (e.g., GHG reductions, disadvantaged community benefits, energy/water savings, and other co -benefits). 5. Grantee shall maintain accurate and detailed records documenting project description, project location, and schedule, GGRF dollars allocated, and leveraged funds throughout the duration of the project. 6. Failure of Grantee to meet the agreed upon terms of achieving required GHG reduction may result in project termination and recovery of funds. 7. Grant funds used on Urban and Community Forestry projects shall adhere to the following: a. Must contain a tree planting component. b. Must be located in or provide direct, meaningful and assured benefits to a disadvantaged community, if approved as part of the project and as outlined in the Urban and Community Forestry Grants Procedural Guide. II. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS All Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) projects are required to monitor and report on carbon flux. This includes direct emissions, avoided emissions and sequestration. All such emissions should be monitored and reported separately. In addition, the Urban & Community Forestry and Forest Legacy Program Grants have to monitor and report on other metrics. Monitoring should be done at sufficient intervals to allow periodic reporting per the specific requirements of the individual grant program. Carbon flux should be expressed as the difference between the pre -project baseline and the in -progress or completed project at the end of the given monitoring period. 1 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING This will require the establishment of a pre -project baseline from which direct emissions, avoided emissions and sequestration can be periodically measured throughout the crediting period 1 on the project area. Emissions and sequestration measurements should be expressed as metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent [MTCO2e]. Net Greenhouse Gas (GHG) benefit of the project will be determined by the sum of the GHG emissions reductions and sequestration less any GHG emissions resulting from project implementation. All other metrics should be reported in the appropriate units of measure. The reporting requirements should determine the timing and frequency of monitoring actions as described in Table 1. a. TABLE 'I GGRF GRANT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Grant Program What to Report Reporting Frequency Report Due Urban & Community 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, Quarterly, At January 1, April 1, Forestry 11, 12, 13, 14, Completion July 1, September 15, 16, 18, 19, 1, At Completion 20 Fuels Reduction 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Completion Completion Reforestation Services 2, 3, 6, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Completion Completion Forest Legacy 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, Annually, At September 1, At 11, 12, 13, 17, Completion Completion 19, 20 Forest Pest Control 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Completion Completion Demonstration State 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Forests Research Completion Completion b. GGRF GRANT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. Increased carbon sequestration through tree growth. 2. Increased carbon sequestration through tree growth and timberland management. 3. GHG emissions resulting from project implementation actions (fuel reduction activities, timber harvesting, sanitation harvesting, site preparation, research activities, etc.) 4. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from reducing hazardous fuel load potential that could lead to large wildfires. 1 The crediting period is the time period over which the project accrues GHG benefits. 2 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 5. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from retaining the forest and avoiding conversion to another use. 6. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from utilization of the removed trees or other vegetation for biomass energy, solid wood products or other products. 7. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from preventing spread of disease to healthy forests by selectively removing pest- or pathogen -infected trees. 8. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from research activities. 9. Estimated net GHG benefit achieved to date. 10. Estimated net GHG benefit for entire project to date [provide total MTCO2e over the project life]. 11. Project status [provide one of the following: (a) started during reporting period; or (b) in progress.] 12. Project activities completed [e.g., milestones achieved]. 13. Additional project benefits and results [if applicable, provide estimated totals, if available, or qualitative descriptions, of the following: (a) vehicle miles traveled reductions; (b) open space or greenbelt creation or preservation; (c) wildlife habitat preservation; (d) tons of biomass generated from forest easements and delivered to a renewable energy facility; (e) tons of harvested wood generated from forest easements and delivered to a mill; and (f) property acquired to be repurposed as an urban forestry project site.] 14. Number of trees planted and location. 15. Vegetation planted and location. 16. Maintenance activities conducted. 17. Verification that the land is still being managed in accordance with the terms of the forest conservation easement. 18. Verification that the site is still being maintained in accordance with the terms of the grant agreement. 19. At completion, summarize project accomplishments, including benefits to disadvantaged communities. GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 20. At completion, summarize co -benefits for entire project [if applicable, e.g., vehicle miles traveled reductions; open space creation or preservation; wildlife habitat preservation]. III. PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/RECOGNITION All projects funded both fully and partially by the GGRF must clearly display, identify and label themselves as being part of the "California Climate Investments" program. The acknowledgement must contain the "California Climate Investments" and CAL FIRE logos as well as the following statement: "Funding for this project provided by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as part of the California Climate Investments Program." A draft of the acknowledgement must be approved by the STATE prior to publication. 4 2014/2015 Urban & Community Forestry GGRF Grant Programs PROJECT APPLICATION Fill out the form completely. Please see the submittal instructions at the bottom of the form. The Project Tracking Number requested is listed in the letter of Invitation you received. CAL FIRE Project Tracking Number: I14-GHG-OF-01-MGMT-0002 Name of Organization[National City Project Title National City Urban Forest Management Planning Project Type' Management Activities For GHG Reduction Requested Grant $I $250,285.00 i Matching $ I $26,400.00 I Total Project$ Primary Source of lother (will require explanation) Technical Advice $276,685.00 The City would contract for required specialty services (arborist, forester) and use in-house staff. Dudek Consulting advised on this proposal. Professional's First Name Ikuna Professional's Last Name liMuthusamy 1. Applicant information - Eligible applicants include cities, counties, qualifying districts, or nonprofit organizations qualified under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Type of Organization 'City Primary Project Contact Information First Name 'Leslie Last Name [Deese Email (ldeese@nationalcityca.gov Address 1 Address 2 City State 11243 National City Boulevard Phone Number' (619) 336-4240 (National City Explanation (if required): CountylSan Diego Zip Code 191950-4301 Secondary Project Contact Information First Name IKuna Last Name IMuthusamy Email Ikmuthusamy@nationalcityca.pov Address 1 11243 National City Boulevard Address 2 - City State !California Phone Number' (619) 336-4383 'National City CountylSan Diego 'California Zip Code 191 950-4301 2. Location Information - List the cities/neighborhoods served by the project. National City will be directly served. Additionally, benefits will be realized by local and international communities since National City is located 5 miles south of downtown San Diego, on San Diego Bay in Southern San Diego County, and 10 miles north of Baja California, Mexico. 3. Partner information - List primary project partners or co-sponsors Name of Organization 1 (Urban Corps of San Diego First Name Ty Last Name (Stems Partner Contact Title (Landscape Architect & Design Build Manager Email tstemsOurbancorps.org Comments Phone Number' (619) 235-6884 phone extension 3210 Name of Organization 2 l First Name I Partner Contact Title I Last Name Email I Comments Ii List Any Additional Partner Organizations 4. Narrative - Describe the project by answering the questions below. Please be thorough, but concise with your answers. You should refer to the grant guidelines document, grant program Request For Proposals (RFP), the CA Urban Forestry Act (PRC Sections 4799.06 - 4799.12) and the CAL FIRE website for guidance on parts 4A - 4E. A. GHG Methodology, reporting and tracking. Describe the methods used to quantify GHG reductions over at least 40 years. How will GHG be reported and tracked for this project? Continued on next page. Phone Number' Due to space limitations the below is an abbreviated discussion of GHG methodology, reporting and tracking. A more detailed version of this discussion is provided in Attachment A along with modeling results and supporting data. The greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits calculated for this proposal are derived from anticipated planting of 4,000 trees in vacant planting sites, which is expected to occur over a 40-year period. Development of an urban forest management plan will also result in GHG benefits by outlining practices that will maintain a healthy urban forest, minimize mortality, and promote tree replacement. The GHG values presented beiow were calculated using the USDA Forest Service Urban Tree Carbon Calculator (for sequestered and avoided values) and the California Emission Estimator Model (CaJEEMod) (for emissions values) and provide estimates at 40 years following planting. Using the Tree Carbon Calculator, the Total CO2 Stored value (kg/tree) was calculated for ten representative tree species that would be likely planting candidates in the City. Each of the ten calculated Total CO2 Stored values was then multiplied by 400, assuming an even distribution of tree species across the 4,000 trees planted. The Total CO2 Stored values for all 4,000 trees were added together to present the Estimate of GHG Sequestered value identified below. The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) value (kg/tree) was also calculated for the ten representative tree species. It was assumed that 25-percent of the planted trees would be planted in each azimuth location (north, south, east, or west) and that trees would be planted between 20 and 40 feet from a structure. The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) values for all 4,000 trees were then added together to present the Estimate of GHG Avoided value included below. Ca!EEMod was used to calculate estimated project emissions. The emissions total includes calculations for tree planting/maintenance over a 40 year period. It is assumed that 100 trees will be planted each year and that 40 trees can be planted each day. For planting, the following power equipment will be used: auger (Tier 4, 85 hp, 7 hours/day, 700 total hours) and truck (gas -powered, 300 hp, 20 miles/ day, 2,000 total miles). For maintenance (5-year cycle, 20 trees maintained/day, 39 years (no maintenance in Year 1)), the following power equipment will be used: chainsaw (gas -powered, 8 hp, 4 hours/day, 6,240 total hours), chipper (Tier4, 70 hp, 4 hours/day, 6,240 total hours), and truck (gas -powered, 300 hp, 20 miles/day, 31,200 total miles). A. GHG Methodology, reporting and tracking. Continued from previous page. Additional discussion, calculations, and examples should be attached. GHG totals will be tracked and reported over the grant period using the Tree Carbon Calculator (for sequestered and avoided values) and CalEEMod (for emissions values). Project GHG reporting will be completed quarterly for each grant project progress report. Projected direct sequestration will be reported separately from the calculated value of avoided emissions. For GHG sequestration and avoidance values, the Calculator will be used and inputs will be based on the total trees planted to date. nata from planted trees (species, size, age) will be recorded and entered into the Calculatorand the results for sequestered carbon and avoided emissions will be summed. For GHG emissions, a log of equipment/vehicles used, duration of use, and miles driven will be kept. This data will then be entered into CalEEMod to calculate emission estimates based on actual equipment/vehicle usage. A summary calculation will be included in each report. GHG reduction calculations and modeling were prepared by Scott Eckardt, Registered Professional Forester # 2835. GHG that will be sequestered by the project (t)19,871 GHG emissions that will be avoided by the project (t) 12,888 GHG that will be emitted by the project (t) k Total GHG Reduction by the project (I) 12,46 B. Background and Rationale - What is the situation, condition, or problem to be addressed by the project? National City (population: 59,834 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013 Estimate)) manages an estimated 10,000 trees and 4,000 vacant planting spaces. Historically, the City has minimally managed their trees with little focus on long-term planning. The result is a backlog/lack of maintenance of the City's urban forest since tree work is not tracked and no tree inventory or guidance for management exists. The City needs an inventory and urban forest management plan to facilitate a proactive approach for City trees and to maximize the benefits provided by City and privately owned trees. The City is requesting grant funds to accomplish their objectives by creating urban forestry planning and guidance document anchored by an Urban Forest Management Plan, updating the Tree Ordinance and Park Tree Ordinance, creating a Master Tree Planting Plan (streets and parks), updating the City's website to include tree management and policy information, updating trim cycles, and to provide a web -based schedule of urban forestry activities for resident's to access. Public outreach is also included. The City includes a substantial area that is within the disadvantaged communities classification (see Enviroscreen Results in Attachment B) and urban forestry management would provide benefits to these communities. National City realizes that its current tree polices, operations, and urban forestry program require review and updating to remain consistent with industry standards, evolving urban forest management methods, and so that it can provide long-term benefits to its citizens and neighbors. The City's effort to update tree policies and public awareness through inventorying the urban forest and creation of an Urban Forest Management Plan would help in maximizing the benefits of trees and the urban forest, including offsetting carbon emissions, and co -benefits including conserving energy through strategic shade tree planting, reducing stormwater runoff through canopy interception, assisting with water quality and erosion control, beautifying the City, and improving air quality and calming neighborhoods, among other benefits derived from a well -managed urban forest. C. Project Objective - What are the objectives of the proposed project? The primary goal of the proposed Project is to update outdated tree policies and prepare a Long Range Urban Forest Management Plan that includes City -specific goals and implementable objectives for goal attainment. The City is in need of an Urban Forest Management overhaul that this project will provide. The Project objectives, which are aligned with the Urban & Community Forestry Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reduction Grant Program conditions, include the following: 1) Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory for park lands and street ROW. 'The inventory will enable analysis of species composition, size of tree and canopy width, overall health, and estimated lifespan. Utilize Tree Management Software to manage trees and inform the development of the City's Long Range Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) and Master Tree Plan. 2) Develop a UFMP for the City's Forest. The UFMP will be the centerpiece of National City's long-term, sustainable tree management strategy, focusing on urban forestry operations, policies, programs, and GHG reduction activities for a 40-year period. 3) Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances based on the results presented in the UFMP. These tree policies and procedures will be enforced by the City in order to optimize the benefits of It's urban forest, and to help meet the goals of the UFMP. 4) Improve City's Urban Tree Program Webslte and provide a web -based tree maintenance scheduling interface for residents. D. Scope of Work - Describe the approach to be used, the design (methods), and implementation of the project. Include who will be involved with specific tasks and justify why the approach, methods and implementation is the most effective way to accomplish the objectives. Include a description of project sign contents and their locations. (continued on next page) National City will meet each of the proposed objectives in the following manner: 1) Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory- The City's Engineering and Public Works Department will utilize consulting ISA certified arborists to inventory approximately 10,000 trees. The inventory would be conducted according to the Minimum Data Collection Attributes for Cal Fire Grant -Funded Urban Tree Inventories. Tree mapping will be conducted using Trimble data loggers with sub- meter Global Positioning System technology to accurately locate existing trees and vacant tree planting sites (estimated 4,000 vacant sites) in the City's parks and right-of-ways. The City will purchase mobile data collectors to carry out this task and the data collected will be integrated Into a web -based tree management application. The consulting arborists and City personnel will train members of partner non-profit, Urban Corps of San Diego, to assist in conducting the inventory. Working with Urban Corps will promote cost efficiency, community employment, education, and public outreach. 2) Develop a Long Range Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) - The City will contract with urban foresters for preparation of a UFMP. This plan will address the current status of the City's urban forest; evaluate existing tree management policies; provide recommendations for editing or amending existing policies; identify routine and emergency tree maintenance standards; provide design, tree selection, removal, and planting recommendations; provide City staffing recommendations; identify tree inventory management options; identify priority maintenance treatment and planting areas; provide natural resource management recommendations; provide community education outreach and Arbor Day Celebration guidelines; and identify and quantify the benefits of the City's urban forest, including carbon sequestration, stormwater, and air quality annual benefits and strategies. Additionally, the UFMP will provide long-term management goals and objectives for a 40-year period that will be broken into manageable and attainable 5-year milestones with annual operating costs. Census tracts Identified by CalEnviroscreen 2.0 as disadvantaged communities will be identified bythe UFMP as priority areas for maintenance and plantings. The preparation of the UFMP will involve key representative stakeholders and the communities with an interest in the proper care, maintenance, and enhancement of the City's urban forest. it is anticipated that the City would contract with Urban Corps for planting trees to implement the planting program called out in the UFMP. This is a cost-effective measure and promotes investment in the local community. 3) Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances- The purpose of this objective is to evaluate and revise tree policies and ordinances to better meet the needs and desires of the City. Once drafted these will be adopted by the City Council. The ordinance will encourage and provide direction for preserving and enhancing the existing tree canopy, improving tree quality and health, and increasing the number of trees through implementing sound and sustainable urban forest management practices and planning policies. Basic tree planting techniques, species selection, tree removal policies, and maintenance standards will be included. A CEQA EIR will not be required to adopt an updated tree ordinance. D. Scope of Work - Continued from previous page 4) Improve City's Urban Forest Website and Develop a Web -based Maintenance Scheduling interface for Residents - Long term community Involvement and education will be a key component of the proposed urban forest management program, since many trees are on private property. Providing comprehensive tree management Information can help residents better manage their trees. Additionally, residents are often unsure how to request tree work, determine when tree work is scheduled, or how they can help plant and care for trees. The updated website will act as a tool for public outreach and education regarding the City's urban forest and will provide an active resource for information about trees and tree care. The website will promote the urban forest to the residents of National City and encourage an active role in managing their own trees. Additionally, a web -based portal allowing access to information about specific trees will be developed and made accessible to the public. This portal will enable City staff to publish select tree information, including trimming and removal/replacement schedules for residents to view. This portal will be promoted by the City as part of educational outreach about the City's urban forests and the City's tree care program and will identify community benefits of trees and a healthy urban forest. The project will be a major update of the City's current urban forestry practices. It will include a team of ISA certified arborists and Urban Corps staff, urban foresters, a Registered Professional Forester (as needed), City public works staff, City planners, and the interested public. The City will put the specialty services work for the project out to bid to qualified consultants with demonstrated experience in this type of work and use in-house staff as necessary. The team will work collaboratively throughout the process, will seek public input through various means, including on-line surveys and public workshops. The team will consult the CalFire Regional Forester for assistance throughout project implementation to ensure that the Regional Forester's input is taken into account and that the project is meeting expectations and consistent with current science and urban forest best practices in the region. The UFMP and policy documents created by this project will become the cornerstone for tree and urban forest management in National City and will guide future tree maintenance budgeting and staffing practices for years to come. It is anticipated that the City wilt realize many of the benefits of a well -treed city, including higher property values, improved building heating and cooling efficiency, reduced urban heat island effects, stormwater mitigation, Improved air quality, and reduced road maintenance costs. The project will also target the primary aim of this grant program, which Is to promote atmospheric carbon capture and storage in urban forests. The planting of 4,000 trees that would be facilitated by the City's updated plan would avoid the emission of and sequester over 12,000 tons of GHG over a 40-year time period. E. Project Timeline - Provide a project timeline. Do not list specific dates or months due to uncertainty in when projects may begin. Plan on projects ending no later than December 19, 2019. For more information, please refer to the more detailed timeline included as Attachment C: Grant Awarded - 2015 Grant Agreement Executed —2016 Conduct Tree Inventory (10,000 trees) -14 weeks total Policy & Ordinance Review and Modification -4 weeks (concurrent with Tree inventory and UFMP preparation) Draft Urban Forest Management Plan (community meetings and draft plan) -20 weeks total GHG Emission Tracking and Reporting 2017 and 2018 Web -based Forest Management System and website update - 5 weeks (concurrent with UFMP preparation) Meetings - throughout contract duration Project Complete no later than December 2019 F. Tree Information (if applicable} - Provide the following information about any trees or plants to be planted as part of the grant project. Include information even if the trees or plants are not to be funded by CAL FIRE. Species List - Provide a list of the tree and plant species for this grant project . include common name, Genus, and species. Include the approximate number of each species to be used. List minimum planting stock size for each species. The proposed project would conduct an inventory, prepare an UFMP, update the City's urban forestry policies and ordinances, and create a web portal for use by the City and the public for information about trees and urban forestry activities in the City. This work would lead to the planting of 4,000 trees in the city over a 40-year time period. Trees and planting would be funded by the City or other non -grant funding mechanisms. The ten species anticipated to be candidates for planting and which were used to calculate GHG benefits of the project are as follows: Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora), redflower gum (Corymbla ficifolia), Indian laurel fig (Ficus microcarpa), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), New Zealand Christmas tree (Metrosideros excelsa), paperbark (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis), Victorian box (Pittosporum undulatum), and London plane tree (Platanus x acerifolia) It is assumed that approximately 400 of each species would be planted over the 40-yeartimeframe resulting in a total of 4,000 trees. These are assumed to be 3-year-old trees (15-gallon containers). It should be noted that grant funding does not directly plant trees but would promote and establish a program of planting for the City for many years to come. Total Project Tram [4,000 j Total CAL FIRE Funded: G. Other deliverables. List all other project deliverables and quantities to be funded by CAL FIRE, as well as overall project totals. Project deliverables include the four items Identified under Sections C and D, above. This includes an Inventory, UFMP, updated policies and ordinances for management of the urban forest and trees in the city, and an interactive web portal for use by City staff and the public. The citywould also track and annually reportGHGbenefits to Cal Fire. 5. Budget Information A. Budget Detail - Provide a specific budget for work to be done. The budget should be based on bid quotes and/or estimates from vendors or on actual costs that will be incurred. The line items listed should be specific enough to adequately describe project expenses. Use the Excel format CAL FIRE has provided for your budget, and follow the guidance in the Procedural Guide. You should note that applicants, if successful in being awarded a grant, will have to follow this budget and will only have the opportunity for minor budget adjustments. The total amount of the project can not be changed later. B. Vendor List - List the vendors that have provided you quotes or estimates for this project. A. Total estimated project budget is $276,685. This inciudes C-alFire grant funds in the amount of $250.2R5 and City match in the amount of $26,400. See detailed budget spreadsheet in Attachment D. B. Vendors Providing Estimates and Quotes: Dudek Associates Consulting, Urban Corps, California Surveying and Drafting C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Describe the basis for the budget amounts listed above. Applicants will be expected to adhere to this budget (Continued on next page). Refer to detailed budget included as Attachment D Greenhouse Ws Reduction Fund Urban end Community Forestry Program - Project Budget City of Wiped City Bridget Proposal Description Cat Bo.. Col firs Great Share Mints, Match Toed --� Pasaonnek Selmer estimate! @ 400 hrs ($85,W0/yri $42/hrX400hrs. Employee Benefits estimated @ 400 hrs $850/hrX40 Ms Subtotal pebbling Tr,s te..ntory Task 1. Tree Mapping ih Aasesment 10.000 tries/4,000 vacant spaces $2/tree/space 28 i , Task 2 Tree Data Assessments 40 hit X 5160/hr ° 6, .. Task 3. rTree Evaluations 40 hrs. X $160/hr , ,, Task 4: Tree Mgrnt Software (CelFire i Software license & fixed setup costs 20, " •." �:- Subtotal , " 'urban ;`crest Mampmnas Plan 1- � t tmseting/daasty ia s dt� acqui esk 1e-Ksdc off meeting/data eryusstion ale l-b do meetings community ask 1c -2 community outreach meetings 'Tilsit id-4-mid projectmeet„Ye 5ab0ottl � 34,750 ZtgAODaft 1 2s- urban Forest Sytus ads 2b-Tree Management Policies ask 2 - Biro hnent y Management p �� ask 2d-Tree Maintenance Program ask 2e- Tree Selection ask2f-Tm removal and planting ask 2g- Stewardship and community Outreach ask 2h- is Goals and Objectives ask 2i-OeptSynergy ask 2j- Urban Forest Benefits askA-Canopy Coverage Analysis aSk 2l- Urban Forest Program Fending Subtotal 48r6ES urstr Draft 2 Subtotal 1.040 C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Continued from previous page Tuk 4- Pow epeletPiees detbn to aty Cseie4 - Suktetel 5400 5,400 gHG Grantee Traddag& Retiredly Subtotal 2 yes m repwtlng 32 hrs. X $160 3120 5,126 Tree PaRchFOrdhuowt Deedeern.rt Pdlcy & c, ft cr revorw and modficatien 40 lee. X $225 9000 3 meetings 12 nrs. X $Zt. 2/t Subtotal 12,7004 11,700 asd Forest Wlmt system & nebslbe update g...c,su-mtccftyWei Watts 24l e.X$225 I 5400 Fetings Web Based Forest taan,t System 24 hrs. X $225 5400, P 4 meet ngs 16 hrs. X $225 3t06/ Subtotal 14400 14,400 tmticage 7S miles mind trip/ 16 rrs J56/mfle 1,350mtesX 190 2D00 I repo, fuel, maps, tepes.I 0boat, other mts: field and office ! 10000t 10000 Egsyeesnt datakipgees, field e4p4 etc 7500 7504 Other Direct Costs 25000 25000 band Cods {1M t9,190 M► 25,090 TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 250,2$5 26,400 276,685 PERCENT OF TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 1W ERG D. Matching Funds - List other funding sources, grants, etc., that will meet grant matching requirements. Source 1 1City of National City Amount $20,200 Description Source 2 Employee salaries - $16,800; Employee benefits - $3,400 (see Attachment D) Description Source 3 Amount Description Amount Source 4 I Description Matching funds commen Amount 6. Other Project Benefits - List other quantifiable benefits of the project (co -benefits). Please show how the measurement of these co -benefits was derived. Attachments can be provided as necessary. See Attachment E for full citations and additional co -benefits. Value to the City of 4,000 additional trees planted: $124,000-356,000; Value of 10,000 trees improved/maintained in the existing urban forest $310,000-890,000; The UFMP would protect and enhance the value of the urban forest resource in National City. Over 40 years 10,000 trees could reap $2.8 to $43 million in benefits A healthy urban forest could reduce infrastructure maintenance needs. A UC Davis study found that 20% shade on a street improves pavement condition by 11%, which is a 60% savings for resurfacing over 30 years. Portland, Oregon saved 43% ($64 million) by integrating green infrastructure, including planting 4,000 new trees, into a combined gray -green infrastructure. Stormwater runoff/flooding benefits: a mature tree can store 50-100 gallons of water during large storms which equates to 200,000-400.000 gallons stored per storm (4,000 trees) and 500,000-1,000,000 gallons for 10,000 trees. Health and quality of life benefits: various studies showed a lower rate of asthma (25% lower for every 340 trees per square kilometer); attenuation of noise in the urban environment, 25% reduction in domestic aggression and violence; Traffic Calming/Safety: average 3 mph reduction in vehicle speeds in treed areas; Economic: positive consumer response in areas with trees, increased property values and tax revenues for the City. 7. Certifications & Forms- The following certifications must be filled out and signed by the appropriate person. A. Certification of Party Responsible For Maintenance (if trees/plants to be planted or cared for in project) 1, Appropriate representative Leslie Deese certify that the Appropriate agency National City will provide or be responsible for 100% of the maintenance for a minimum of 3 years after the end of the grant period in accordance with ANSI A-300 tree care standards, the accompanying ISA Best Management Practices and the standards outlined in the grant agreement and/or grant attachments with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Date Signature �.. Title City Manager, City of National City April 29, 2015 IPhone Number 619-336-4240 B. Statement of Compliance With Ali Applicable Laws (all projects must fill out and sign) Appropriate representative !Leslie Deese certify that the Appropriate agencyipational City will abide by all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations and policies in carrying out this State bond -funded project. Failure to do so will lead to cancellation of the grant award. Signature Title City Manager, National City DatelApril 29, 2015 1 Phone Number 619-336-4240 C. Recycling Certification (all projects must fill out and sign) - This certification applies to all state contracts and, to the extent feasible, all federally funded contracts. Contractor certifies under penalty of perjury that percent 15° of the minimum, if not exact, percentage of recycled content, both post consumer waste and secondary waste as defined in the Public Contract Code, Sections 12616 and 12200, in materials, goods, or supplies offered or products used in performance of this Agreement, regardless of whether the product meets the required recycled product percentages defined in the Public Contract Code, Sections 12161 and 12200. Contractor may certify that the product contains zero recycled content. (PCC 10233, 10308.5, 10354) Signature Title City Manager, National City Datebpril 29, 2015 Phone Number 619-336-4240 D. Checklist of Necessary Forms To Be Completed. Some may not be applicable to your project. r CAL FIRE Urban Forestry Program Environmental Checklist j5 State of California Payee Data Record (Std. 204) (x Governing Body Resolution (must follow sample format) (- Representative project area maps w/ sign locations shown l" Project sign schematic (including CAL FIRE logo) Vc Other: jx State of California Non -Discrimination Compliance (Std. 19) • State of California Drug -Free Workplace Certification (Std. 21) ✓ 5-10 representative site photos ✓ Letters of participation from listed partners ✓ Urban and Community Forestry Project Budget rx Additional GHG Methods, Calculations, Tracking information. Vc• Proof of CalEnviroScreen 2.0 community designation. List other Att H - References; attachments: SIGNATURE: The authorized primary project contact for the applying organization must sign below. This must be the person, or person holding the position, that is mentioned in the required governing body resolution, and the same person or position signing all of the other required forms. The signature indicates that, to the best of the signer's knowledge, all of the information provided in this application and all attached required forms and documents is accurate and correct. The signer additionally acknowledges that they have read and understand the grant program RFP and the Procedural Guide common to all of the CAL FIRE Urban & Community Forestry grant programs. Signature Printed Name [eDeese Title 'City Manager, National City Date !April 29, 2015 Please fill out this form completely. Be sure to save a copy of this form for your records. Submit one (1) electronic copy in the fillable PDF format with all supporting materials to CALFIRE.Grantst4fire ca.aov. Please use "USCF GGRF Project Application" In the E-mail subject line and Include yourself as a cc. Your CC will be proof of your submittal. in addition, submit one (1) hard copy with signatures and all supporting materials to : California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Attention: Grants Management Unit/Urban and Community Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Grant, P.O. Box 944246, Sacramento, CA 94244-2460. Both hard copy and electronic copy must be postmarked no later than the due date in the invitation letter you received. if you would like to mail the hard copy via expedited/overnight mall, please E-mail CALFIRE.Grantseire.ca.gov for the physical mailing address. CAL FIRE Urban & Community Forestry Program GHG Reduction Grants GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION / BENEFIT CALCULATIONS GHG Sequestered Species Age CO2 Sequestration (kg/tree) Total CO2 Stored (kg/tree) Tree Qty Total CO2 (kg) Total CO2 (t) CEDE CICA EUFI81 FIMI MAGR MEEX MEQU PICA PIUN P LAC 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 232.3 111.9 332 42.3 50.8 48.5 71 88.2 0 48.3 4043.4 2740.7 3871.6 1558.5 1056.6 1591.4 1508.8 3269.9 2520.9 2515.9 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1617360 1096280 1548640 623400 422640 636560 603520 1307960 1008360 1006360 1617.36 1096.28 1548.64 623.4 422.64 636.56 603.52 1307.96 1008.36 1006.36 Total GHG Sequestered 9871080 9871.08 GHG Avoided East: GHG Avoided Tree Qty South: GHG Avoided Tree Qty West: GHG Avoided Tree Qty North: GHG Avoided Tree Qty Sum Sum CO2E (kg/tree) CO2E (kg/tree) CO2E (kg/tree) CO2E (kg/tree) (kg) (t) 1440.5 868.9 514.6 693 606.1 646.1 607.6 1350.3 369.4 1503.1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1575.7 918 518.9 674.7 587.9 621.1 600.8 1342.7 343.9 1634.9 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1840.7 1163.4 725.5 964.9 834.8 887.3 838.2 1775.4 500 1927 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 485690 295030 175900 233260 202880 215450 204660 446840 121330 506500 485.69 295.03 175.9 233.26 202.88 215.45 204.66 446.84 121.33 506.5 Total GHG Avoided 2887540 2887.54 Raw Calculations GHG Reductions - East Year CEDE CICA EUFI81 FIMI MAGR MEEX MEQU PICA PIUN PLAC 3 0.2 -0.2 0 0 0 0 0 6 -0.1 2.6 4 1.6 0 0 0 -0.1 0.2 0 9.8 -0.1 3.7 5 3.1 0.3 0 0.2 -0.1 0.3 0 13.6 -0.1 5.8 6 4.6 0.6 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 0 17 -0.1 9.1 7 6.9 0.9 0 0.6 0.4 0.7 0 20.2 -0.1 12.3 8 10.2 1.9 0 0.7 0.7 1.8 0.1 22.7 -0.1 15.4 9 13.5 3.5 0 1.5 1 2.8 0.2 24.3 -0.1 18.5 10 16.7 5.2 0 3.1 1.3 3.8 0.2 25.8 -0.1 21.5 11 20 6.8 -0.1 4.5 1.6 4.8 0.5 27.2 -0.1 24.5 12 23.2 8.3 -0.1 5.8 2.5 5.7 1.4 28.5 -0.1 26.6 13 25.4 9.9 -0.2 7.1 3.7 6.6 2.3 29.8 -0.1 28.3 14 27.2 11.4 -0.2 8.3 5 7.4 3.2 31 -0.1 29.9 15 28.9 12.8 0.1 9.5 6.2 8.2 4.2 32.2 -0.1 31.5 16 30.7 14.2 0.7 10.6 7.4 9.3 5.1 33.3 -0.2 33 17 32.4 15.6 1.3 11.7 8.6 10.5 6.1 34.1 -0.2 34.5 18 34.2 16.9 2 12.7 9.8 11.6 7.4 34.5 -0.2 36 19 35.9 18.3 2.6 13.7 10.9 12.7 8.7 34.9 0 37.4 20 37.7 19.6 3.3 14.6 12.1 13.8 10.1 35.3 0.1 38.8 21 38.5 20.8 4.2 15.8 13.2 14.8 11.4 35.6 0.2 40.1 22 39.4 22.1 5.9 16.8 14.3 15.9 12.8 36 0.4 41.4 23 40.2 23.3 7.5 17.9 15.3 16.9 14.2 36.3 0.6 42.5 24 41.1 24.6 9.2 18.9 16.3 17.8 15.6 36.7 1.1 43.3 25 41.9 25.7 10.9 19.9 17.2 18.8 16.9 37 2.4 44 26 42.8 26.6 12.7 20.9 18.2 19.7 18.2 37.3 3.8 44.6 27 43.6 27.6 14,5 21.8 19.2 20.6 19.5 37.6 5.3 45.3 28 44.4 28.5 16.3 22.7 20.1 21.5 20.8 37.9 6.9 45.9 29 45.3 29.4 17.7 23.6 21.1 22.4 22 38.2 8.7 46.5 30 46.1 30.3 19.3 24.4 22 23.2 23.3 38.5 11 47.1 31 46.9 31.1 20.8 25.3 23 24.1 24.6 38.8 13.5 47.6 32 47.7 32 22.3 26.1 23.9 24.9 25.8 39 16.2 48.1 33 48.6 32.9 23.9 26.9 24.8 25.4 27.1 39.2 19 48.6 34 49.4 33.7 25.5 27.7 25.7 25.9 28.2 39.4 22 49.1 35 50.2 34.5 26.9 28.4 26.6 26.4 28.7 39.6 24.1 49.6 36 50.9 35.3 28.4 29.2 27.2 26.8 29.2 39.8 26 50 37 51.4 36.2 29.8 29.9 27.8 27.3 29.8 39.9 28 50.4 38 51.9 36.8 31.3 30.6 28.4 27.7 30.3 40.1 30 50.8 39 52.5 37.3 32.8 31.3 29 28.2 30.9 40.3 30.4 51.1 40 53 37.8 34,3 31.8 29.6 28.6 31.4 40.5 30.4 51.5 41 53.6 38.3 35.7 32.3 30.1 29.1 31.9 40.6 30.4 51.8 42 54.1 38.8 37 32.7 30.7 29.5 32.5 40.8 30.4 52.1 43 54.6 39.3 38.3 33.1 31.3 29.9 33 41 30.4 52.3 1440.5 868.9 514.6 693 606.1 646.1 607.6 1350.3 369.4 1503.1 Raw Calculations GHG Reductions - South Year CEDE CICA EUFI81 FIMI MAGR MEEX MEQU PICA PIUN PLAC 3 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.8 0 2.2 4 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.2 0 3.1 5 2.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 0 4.9 6 3.7 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 15.4 0 7.9 7 5.8 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0 18.1 0 10.8 8 8.9 0.7 0 0 0.2 1.2 0 20.4 0 13.7 9 11.9 2.2 0 0.7 0.3 2.1 0 22.2 0 16.5 10 15 3.7 0 2.2 0.4 3.1 0 23.9 0 19.2 11 18 5.2 0 3.5 0.5 4 0.2 25.5 0 21.9 12 21.1 6.7 0 4.8 1.2 4.8 1.2 27 0 24.3 13 23.4 8.1 0 6 2.5 5.6 2.2 28.4 0 26.5 14 25.5 9.5 0 7.2 3.7 6.4 3.3 29.8 0 28.6 15 27.6 11 0.2 8.2 4.9 7.2 4.3 31.1 0 30.7 16 29.7 12.6 0.5 9.3 6.1 8.2 5.3 32.3 0 32.8 17 31.8 14.2 0.8 10.3 7.2 9.4 6.4 33.2 0 34.7 18 33.9 15.8 1.1 11.3 8.4 10.5 7.6 33.7 0 36.7 19 36 17.3 1.4 12.2 9.6 11.6 8.9 34.2 0 38.6 20 38.1 18.8 1.7 13.1 10.7 12.6 10.2 34.7 0 40.4 21 39.5 20.2 2.4 14.4 11.9 13.7 11.5 35.2 0 42.1 22 40.9 21.7 4.1 15.6 13 14.7 12.8 35.6 0 43.9 23 42.3 23.1 5,8 16.8 14.1 15.6 14.1 36.1 0 45.4 24 43.7 24.5 7.6 17.9 15.1 16.6 15.4 36.5 0.4 46.6 25 45.2 25.9 9.5 19 16.2 17.5 16.7 36.9 1.6 47.8 26 46.6 27.3 11.3 20.1 17.3 18.4 17.9 37.3 3 49 27 48 28.6 13.2 21.2 18.3 19.3 18.9 37.7 4.5 50.1 28 49.4 30 15.1 22.2 19.4 20.2 19.9 38.1 6.1 51.1 29 50.7 31.3 16.8 23.2 20.4 21 20.9 38.4 7.8 52.1 30 52.1 32.7 18.4 24.1 21.4 21.9 22 38.8 9.9 53.1 31 53.5 34 20.1 25.1 22.4 22.7 23 39.1 12.1 54 32 54.8 35.3 21.9 26 23.4 23.5 24 39.5 14.5 54.9 33 56.2 36.5 23.6 26.9 24.4 24.3 25 39.9 17.1 55.8 34 57.6 37.8 25.4 27.8 25.4 25.1 26.1 40.2 19.8 56.6 35 58.9 39 27.4 28.6 26.4 25.9 27.2 40.5 22 57.4 36 60 40.2 29.5 29.5 27.3 26.7 28.2 40.9 24.1 58.1 37 60.7 41.4 31.6 30.3 28.2 27.4 29.3 41.2 26.3 58.8 38 61.5 42.3 33.7 31.1 29.1 28.2 30.4 41.5 28.7 59.4 39 62.3 42.9 35.8 31.9 29.9 28.9 31.5 41.8 29.2 60 40 63.1 43.5 38 32.6 30.8 29.6 32.6 42.1 29.2 60.6 41 63.8 44.1 39.4 33.2 31.7 30.3 33.6 42.4 29.2 61.1 42 64.6 44.7 40.7 33.9 32.5 31 34.7 42.7 29.2 61.6 43 65.4 45.2 41.9 34.5 33.4 31.7 35.5 43 29.2 61.9 1575.7 918 518.9 674.7 587.9 621.1 600.8 1342.7 343.9 1634.9 Raw Calculations GHG Reductions - West Year CEDE CICA EUFI81 FIMI MAGR MEEX MEQU PICA PIUN PLAC 3 1.3 0 0 -0.1 0 0.1 0 13.3 0 7 4 4.5 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.4 0 18.1 0 9.6 5 7.7 1.3 0 1.5 -0.1 0.7 0 21.9 0 12.5 6 10.9 2.1 0 2.4 0.6 0.9 0 25.3 0 15.7 7 14 2.9 0 3.3 1.5 1.4 0.1 28.5 0 18.8 8 16.9 4.3 0 4.1 2.4 3.5 0.2 31 0 21.8 9 19.7 6.4 0 5.3 3.3 5.4 0.3 32.7 0 24.7 10 22.6 8,4 0 7.2 4.2 7.3 0.4 34.3 0 27.6 11 25.5 10.4 0 8.9 5.1 9.1 0.9 35.9 0 30.5 12 38.4 12.4 0.1 10.5 6.3 10.8 2.8 37.3 0 32.9 13 30.9 14.3 0.1 12 7.8 12.4 4.7 38.7 0 35.1 14 33.2 16.2 0.1 13.4 9.3 14 6.7 40 0 37.2 15 35.5 18 0.9 14.8 10.8 15.5 8.7 41.2 0 39.3 16 37.8 19.7 2.4 16.1 12.2 16.8 10.7 42.4 0 41.3 17 40.1 21.3 3.8 17.4 13.7 17.9 12.8 43.3 0 43.3 18 42.4 23 5.4 18.6 15.1 19 14.3 44 0.2 45.2 19 44.7 24.6 7 19.7 16.5 20 15.8 44,7 0.6 47 20 47 26.2 8.6 20.9 17.9 21 17.2 45.3 1.1 48.9 21 48.3 27.7 10.3 22.3 19.3 22 18.6 45.9 1.6 50.6 22 49.7 29.3 12 23.6 20.5 22.9 20 46.5 2.2 52.3 23 51 30.8 13.8 24.9 21.6 23.8 21.5 47 2.9 53.8 24 52.3 32.2 15.6 26.1 22.7 24.7 22.9 47.6 3.9 54.7 25 53.7 33.7 17.4 27.3 23.8 25.6 24.3 48.1 5.8 55.6 26 55 34.9 19.3 28.5 24.9 26.5 25.6 48.6 7.8 56.5 27 56.3 36.2 21.2 29.6 26 27.3 26.7 49.1 10 57.4 28 57.5 37.4 23.1 30.8 27.1 28.2 27.8 49.6 12.4 58.2 29 58.3 38.6 24.7 31.8 28.2 29 29 50.1 14.9 59 30 59.1 39.8 26.3 32.9 29.2 29.7 30,1 50.5 17.2 59.7 31 59.9 41 27.9 33.9 30.3 30.5 31.2 50.9 19.6 60.5 32 60.7 42.1 29.6 34.9 31.3 31.3 32.3 51.1 22.1 61.2 33 61.5 43.3 31.2 35.9 32.3 32 33.4 51.3 24.7 61.8 34 62.3 44.4 32.9 36.8 33.3 32.7 34.5 51.4 27.6 62.4 35 63.1 45.5 35.1 37.8 34.4 33.4 35.7 51.6 30 63 36 63.6 46.6 37.5 38.7 35.2 34.1 36.9 51.7 32.4 63.6 37 64 47.7 39.8 39.6 36 34.8 38.2 51.9 34.9 64.1 38 64.3 48.6 42.2 40.5 36.8 35.5 39.4 52.1 37.6 64.6 39 64.7 49.2 44.6 41.3 37.5 36.1 40.6 52.2 38.1 65.1 40 65 49.7 47 42 38.3 36.8 41.8 52.4 38.1 65.6 41 65.4 50.3 47.9 42.5 39.1 37.4 43 52.5 38.1 66 42 65.8 50.9 48.5 43.1 39.8 38.1 44.2 52.6 38.1 66.3 43 66.1 51.5 49.2 43.6 40.6 38.7 44.9 52.8 38.1 66.6 1840.7 1163.4 725.5 964.9 834.8 887.3 838.2 1775.4 500 1927 GREENHOUSE GAS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY, TRACKING AND REPORTING The greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits calculated for this proposed project are derived from anticipated planting of 4,000 trees in vacant planting sites in the City, which is expected to occur over a 40-year period. Development of an urban forest management plan will result in additional GHG benefits by outlining best practices that will maintain a healthy urban forest, minimize mortality, and promote replacing damaged or diseased trees. Since a baseline inventory of the City's urban forest has not yet been completed, the GHG benefits presented herein represent the GHG benefits that would be derived from planting new trees over an assumed 40-year period. Greenhouse Gas Calculations: The GHG benefits identified for this project were calculated using the USDA Forest Service Urban Tree Carbon Calculator (Tree Carbon Calculator) for 'Estimate of GHG Sequestered' values and 'Estimate of GHG Avoided' values, and the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) to obtain 'Estimated Project GHG Emissions' values and provide estimates of benefits at 40 years following planting. The following presents the methods used for determining each of the GHG values above and the results of those calculations. For the 'Total GHG Benefit of the Project' value, the following formula was used: [Total GHG Benefit of the Project] = ([Estimate of GHG Sequestered] + [Estimate of GHG Avoided]) — [Estimated Project GHG Emissions] Estimate of GHG sequestered (t): 9,871 Estimate of GHG avoided (t): 2,888 Estimate of Project GHG emissions (t): 298 Total GHG benefit of Project (t): 12,461 Estimate of GHG Sequestered: Using the Tree Carbon Calculator, the Total CO2 Stored value (kg/tree) was calculated for ten representative tree species that would be likely planting candidates in the City. These species included: Deodar cedar, camphor tree, redflower gum, Indian laurel fig, southern magnolia, New Zealand Christmas tree, paperbark, Canary Island pine, Victorian box, and London plane tree. The climate zone for the project is 'South Coast', which was entered into the Calculator. The 'Tree Age' value in the Calculator was set at 43 years, which assumes that 3-year-old container trees would be planted and grown for 40 years. Each of the ten calculated Total CO2 Stored values (one for each tree species) was then multiplied by 400, assuming an even distribution of tree species across the 4,000 trees planted (400 trees of each species planted). The Total CO2 Stored values for all 4,000 trees were added together to arrive at the 'Estimate of GHG Sequestered' value. Estimate of GHG Avoided: The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) value (kg/tree) was also calculated for the ten representative tree species. Two of the factors affecting the emission reduction values are the placement of the tree in relation to adjacent structures (Tree Azimuth) and the distance of that tree from the structure (Tree Distance Class). Based on the layout of City streets, planted trees may be located on the north, east, south, or west side of a structure. Therefore, it was assumed that 25-percent of the 4,000 new trees would be planted in each azimuth location (north, south, east, or west of structure). Additionally, the 'Tree Distance Class' value in the Calculator was set to 'Near', which represents a tree planted between 20 and 40 feet from a structure. This value was appropriate as calculated setback distances from planting strips to structures in the City average approximately 25 feet. The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) values for all 4,000 trees were then added together to arrive at the 'Estimate of GHG Avoided' value. Estimated Project GHG Emissions: The CalEEMod software package was used to calculate estimated project emissions. CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential GHG emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects. The emissions total presented above includes calculations for tree planting efforts and tree maintenance efforts over a 40 year period. The following provides more detail regarding the assumptions and values used in this calculation: Tree Planting: Planting of 4,000 trees in vacant planting sites in the City is assumed to occur over a 40-year period, with 100 trees planted each year. Additionally, it is assumed that 40 trees can be planted each day resulting in a total of 2.5 planting days/year for 40 years. Equipment needed to accomplish these efforts is assumed to include an auger (for planting hole digging), and a truck to transport the auger, planting crew, tree materials, and non -powered hand tools. The following assumptions were made for equipment usage and were entered into the CalEEMod software: • Auger: A Tier 4, 85 horsepower auger would be used for 7 hours each planting day (700 total hours over 40 yea rs) • Vehicle: A gas -powered, 300 horsepower truck would be driven 20 miles each planting day (2,000 total miles over 40 years) Tree Maintenance: Maintaining 4,000 planted trees in the City is assumed to occur over a 39-year period (no maintenance assumed in Year 1), with maintenance occurring on a 5-year cycle. The 5-year maintenance cycle assumes that 800 trees will be visited each year. Assuming that 20 trees can be maintained per day, a total of 40 maintenance days would be needed each year for 39 years. Equipment needed to accomplish these efforts is assumed to include a chainsaw, a chipper, and a truck to tow the chipper and transport the maintenance crew, chainsaw, and other non -powered hand tools. The following assumptions were made for equipment usage and were entered into the CalEEMod software: • Chipper: A Tier 4, 70 horsepower chipper would be used for 4 hours each maintenance day (6,240 total hours over 39 years) • Chainsaw: A gas powered, 8 horsepower chainsaw would be used for 4 hours each maintenance day (6,240 total hours over 39 years) • Vehicle: A gas -powered, 300 horsepower truck would be driven 20 miles each maintenance day (31,200 total miles over 39 years) The resulting carbon emissions totals for tree planting and tree maintenance efforts generated by the CalEEMod software were then added together to determine the Estimated Project GHG Emissions value. Greenhouse Gas Tracking and Reporting: GHG totals will be tracked and reported over the grant period using the Tree Carbon Calculator (for GHG sequestered and avoided values) and CalEEMod (for GHG emissions values). Project GHG reporting will be completed quarterly for each grant project progress report. Projected direct sequestration will be reported separately from the calculated value of avoided emissions. For GHG sequestration and avoidance values, the Tree Carbon Calculator will be used and inputs will be based on the total trees planted to date. Data from planted trees (species, size, age) will be recorded and entered into the Tree Carbon Calculator and the results for sequestered carbon and avoided emissions will be summed. This will allow for tracking and reporting a running total of carbon benefits from the project. For GHG emissions, a log of equipment/vehicles used, duration of use, and miles driven will be kept. This data will then be entered into CalEEMod to calculate emission estimates based on actual equipment/vehicle usage. A summary calculation (as shown above for the Total GHG Benefit of the Project) will be included in each report. Project GHG Emissions Calculations Outputs from Modeling Conducted Using CalE'EMod Emissions Modeling Program Planting Emissions Metric Tons of CO2E Year Emissions 2015 4.6925 2016 4.6328 2017 4.5509 2018 4.4685 2019 4.3902 Source: CalEEMod 2015 Maintenance Emissions Metric Tons of CO2E Activity Emissions Annual Chipper/Chainsaw Use 6.7668 Annual Vehicle Trips 0.2835 Annual Total 7.050 Overall Project' Chipper/Chainsaw Use 263.9052 Overall Project Vehicle Trips 11.0576 Overall Project Total Maintenance Emissions 274.9628 Source: CalEEMod 2015 Notes: 'Overall Project calculated for 39 years of emissions. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 31 Tree planting and maintenance Santa Barbara -South of Santa Ynez Range County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric I Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population City Park 5.00 Acre 5.00 217,800.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Rural Climate Zone 4 Utility Company Wind Speed (m/s) 2.7 CO2 Intensity 0 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0 Precipitation Freq (Days) 37 Operational Year 2025 N2O Intensity (Ib/MWhr) 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 2 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase - planting period of 20 days per year over 5 years, total of 100 days; one year of maintenance equipment usage Off -road Equipment - proxy for 85 HP Auger, with high load factor per http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2010/420r10016.pdf Median Life, Annual Activity, and Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling; NR-005d; EPA July 2010 Off -road Equipment - proxy for 85 HP Auger, with high load factor per http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmdl2010/420r10016.pdf Median Life, Annual Activity, and Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling; NR-005d; EPA July 2010 Off -road Equipment - see year 1 Off -road Equipment - see year 1 Off -road Equipment - see year 1 Off -road Equipment - see year 1 Trips and VMT - workers and supplies Vehicle Trips - tree maintenance: 40 days/year, 20 miles/day, total 31,200 miles Consumer Products - no consumer products Area Coating - no structures Landscape Equipment - limited maintenance modeled as construction phase Water And Wastewater - no irrigation, no restrooms Solid Waste - no solid waste Operational Off -Road Equipment - ghost Off -road Equipment - proxy for chainsaw and chipper Sequestration - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 4 Auger and Chipper Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblAreaCoating tblConstEqu ipMiti gation tblConstEqu ipMitigation tblCo nstEqu ipMitigation Area_Nonresidential_Interior 326700 N u m b erOfEq u i p m entMit igaied Tier N u m b erOfEq u i p m e n tMit i g ated tblConstEquipMitigation Tier 0.00 0.00 No Change 0 1.00 5.00 Tier 4 Interim No Change Ter 4 Interim CatEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM tbiConstruction Phase tblConstruction Phase tblConstru ction Ph ase tbl C on structio n Phase tblC onstructio n Ph as e tblC onstru ctio n Ph as e tblConstru ction Ph as e tblConstruction Phase t b I C o n st ru ct i o n P h as e tb I C o n st ru cl i o n P h as e tblC o nstru ction Ph ase tbI C onstru ction Ph ase tbI C onstru ctio n Ph ase tbl C onstructio n Phase tbI C on structio n Ph ase tblCon structio n Phase tbl LandscapeEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment 4. tblOffRoadEquipment 4. tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoad Equipment tblOffRoad Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment • NumDays 8.00 20.00 a NumDays • 8.00 } 20.00 NumDays 8.00 + 20.00 4 NumDays 8.00 + 20.00 NumDays 5.00 t 40.00 NumDays t 8.00 t 20.00 PhaseEndDate 7/10/2015 + 6/10/2016 i PhaseEndDate 7/8/2016 6/9/2017 i PhaseEndDate 7/7/2017 t 6/10/2018 PhaseEndDate 7/6/2018 i 6/7/2019 i PhaseEndDate 8/2/2019 + 7/3/2020 4 4- PhaseStartDate 6/13/2015 i 5/16/2016 PhaseStartDate 6/11/2016 t 5/15/2017 PhaseStartDate 6/10/2017 i 5/14/2018 PhaseStartDate 6/11/2018 + 5/13/2019 i PhaseStartDate 6/8/2019 + 5/11/2020 NumberSummerDays 180 t 1 4- LoadFactor 0.37 + 0.59 LoadFactor 0.37 t 0.59 LoadFactor 0.37 t 0.59 LoadFactor 0.37 i 0.59 LoadFactor 0.37 + 0.59 4 OffRoadEquipmentType t Trenchers OffRoadEquipmentType + Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 + 1.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 t 1.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 + 1.00 4 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM tblOffRoadEquipment : OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00 4 -1; tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 I 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 i 7.00 1- 4- 4 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 I 7.00 4- i tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 4 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 i . 7.00 tbIProjectCharacteristics • OperationalYear -:- 2014 i 2025 4. 4- i tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban Rural t i tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.43 0.00 4 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 i 10.00 4 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 i 10.00 1 i tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 10.00 .1 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 10.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 i 10.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 3 1.00 4 t tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 i 1.00 4 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 i 1.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 i 1.00 4 : tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 i 1.00 itblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 4.00 4 i tblVehicleTrips. SU_TR 1.59 4.00 tblVehicleTrips 4 -:- WD_TR 1.59 i 4.00 ;S. :-. 4tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 5,957,406.75 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Page 5 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 FugitiveExhaust PM10 PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total 8io- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2015 2016 + + 2017 • ' ' 2018 + + + + 2019 •+ + 2020 r + + + + - + + , + r t 1 T i r + ' + + + ' ' + + + — — T T T : 4,6925 4.6328 Total 29.5018 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction Page 6 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5. Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year ton /yr MT/yr 2015 2016 • - r 2017 • 2018 , r 2019 • 2020 • w , ' w w + 1 T y i T y i T + T 1 i T t • r r - - - r T r 4 4.6925 4.6328 4.5509 4.4685 T 4.3902 6.7668 Total 29.5018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Page 7 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM25 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CI-14 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area i 0.0000 ' ' ' ' '— I T i ' ' ' Energy i 0.0000 i Mobile • ' ' ' ' -i, ' ' ' t 11.0576 i i ' ' '— Waste •' ' ' T i i i '— ' ' 0.0000 Water r r '— '— ' -i-r I i ' ' '- 0.0000 Total 11.0576 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational Page 8 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0000 Energy • '— ' r -, ' -I' r 1 t t - — 4 0.0000 Mobile ' ' T + r ' ' ' - 11.0576 - ' ' 1 i Waste ' ' ' T i '— - 0.0000 1 1 Water • r 4 - ' ' T i ' - r 0.0000 i Total 11.0576 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 .Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBIo-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 :Planting Year 1 :Grading i5/18/2015 6/12/2015 5' 20: 2 :Planting Year 2 :Grading :5/16/2016 6/10/2016 5; 20: 3 :Planting Year 3 :Grading 5/15/2017 .▪ 6/9/2017 5; 20: 5 i 4 :Planting Year 4 :Grading :5/14/2018 ,6/10/2018 5: 20 I 4 5 :Planting Years :Grading :5/13/2019 6/7/2019 5: 20; I- 4- -1- 6 :Single Year Operations :Site Preparation :5/11/2020 7/3/2020 5: 40: Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating — sqft) OffRoad Eauipment Phase Name Planting Year 1 Single Year Operations Planting Year 2 Planting Year 3 Planting Year 4 z Planting Year 5 I Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 11 7.00: 97: 0.59 Trenchers I.-2i 4.00: 80: 0.50 :Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 11 7.00: 97: 0.59 •▪ Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 1i 7.00: 97: 0.59 I F I (- Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 1i 7.00: 97: 0.59 F L + 4- • Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1: 7.00. 97' 0.59 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Planting Year 2 Planting Year 1 Planting Year 3 Planting Year 4 Planting Year 5 Single Year rInormOinne Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Tnp Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class 11i 3.00: 1.001 0.00. 12.30i 10.00: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix 1HHDT I- 4 r r 1F 3.00: 1.00i 0.00. 12.30: 10.00: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix IHHDT I 1F 4 3.00 1.001 0.00: 12.30: 10.00: 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix 1HHDT 1. 3.00: 1.001 0.00: 12.30I 10.00: 20.00LD_Mix :HDT_Mix 1HHDT d 1 i 3.00. 1.001 0.00. 12.30: 10.00 20.00:LD_Mix :HOT_Mix IHHDT 4- t- 4- i- + i- - 2: 5.00. 0.00. 0.00. 12.30. 4.60. 20.00: LD_Mix .HDT_Mix . HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Planting Year 1 - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Boo- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road i 4.1712 i Total I I I I I I 41712 CalEEMod Version: CaTEEMod.2013.2.2 3.2 Planting Year 1 - 2015 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 Vendor 0.2873 Worker 7, r r , r , r r r T 0.2340 Total 0.5213 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 4. t e 4.1712 Total 1 I l I I I I I I I I I I I 1 4.1712 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.2 Planting Year 1 - 2015 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 12 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling • + 0.0000 • i r Vendor • T t r T r T 0.2873 Worker • r r r r '— ' T 1 T 0.2340 Total 0.5213 3.3 Planting Year 2 - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Elio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category ton /yr MTtyr ON -Road • i 4.1230 t Total I 1 I i r 4.1230 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.3 Planting Year 2 - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 13 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM a.Category ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e tons/yr MT/yr Hauling is 0.0000 Vendor • r r ' - '— - ' T • r 0.2842 Worker ' ' ' ' r r „ r r r • r , ' - t 0.2257 Total 0.5099 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 4.1230 y Total I I I I 4.1230 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.3 Planting Year 2 - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 14 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling ±• 0.0000 Vendor • r r r r T T y i . 0.2842 1 Worker • r r 0.2257 Total 0.5099 3.4 Planting Year 3 - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2o Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road i + 4.0544 Total 4.0544 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.4 Planting Year 3 - 2017 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 15 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx li CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBro- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling + 0.0000 r Vendor • T 4., T 0.2797 a Worker • r r r r T 1 i y „ n T 0.2169 Total 0.4965 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road i 40544 Total Ir I I I 4.0544 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.4 Planting Year 3 - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 16 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 'r— ,— T T• 7 T • r - 7 , Vendor 0.2797 Worker 0.2169 Total 0.4965 3.5 Planting Year 4 - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category ton lyr MT/yr Off -Road • i 3.9649 1 Total I ! t I I 11 3.9849 I CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Planting Year 4 - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 17 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 Vendor •--• • Y - T • - 0.2749 -1— • ,— • r w r T • • • Worker • 0.2088 Total 0.4836 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NB.- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • t i t 3.9849 Total II I I I II II I I I 3.9849 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Planting Year 4 - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 18 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category ton /yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor• Worker • - - '— '— r r ' r r t T r a 0.0000 ' ' ' 0.2749 , ,— , t 0.2088 Total 0.4836 3.6 Planting Year 5 - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road s 3.9186 i i Total t 3.9186 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.6 Planting Year 5 - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 19 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx '+ Fugitiva PM10 Extiaiiat PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 :* Total Bio-0O2`* NBio- CO2 Total CO2 N20 CO2e Category - ne/yr Hauling Vendor Worker 1 i i i i 0.0000 0.2703 0.2012 Total 0.4715 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Oh -Road i r 1 3.9186 Total 3.9186 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.6 Planting Year 5 - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 20 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bto- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling Vendor • Worker '- '- ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' '— '- ' Y 1 1 1 T 4r- 1 0.0000 1 ,- t _ t 0.2703 ' ' ' T 0.2012 Total 0.4715 3.7 Single Year Operations - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Oft -Road i 6.1229 i i Total I I I I I i 6.1229 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.7 Single Year Operations - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 21 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling is Vendor •r Worker • �— r w '— T T a i 0.0000 a Total 0.6439 Mitigated Construction On -Site a ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road • i 0.1229 i a Total 1 6.1229 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.7 Single Year Operations - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 22 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CHA N20 CO2e Category ton /yr MT/yr 0.0000 Hauling • -� - - r ♦ r Vendor 0.0000 r 1 T r r 1 r • 'f , 0.6439 Worker • Total 0.6439 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated Unmitigated ! 11.0576 11.0576 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Page 23 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT City Park • 20.00 20.00 I 20.00 • 31,856 31,856 Total I 20.00 20.00 20.00 I 31,856 31,85E 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip % Trip Purpose Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-0 or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass -by City Park 8.80 4.60 4.60 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 • 28 • 6 HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I 0.489821: 0.036204: 0.210874: 0.153026: 0.049322: 0.007389: 0.020723: 0.015503: 0.002015: 0.002209: 0.008256: 0.001515• 0.003143 LDA §•g AeYDetaiI Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity , y Mitigated a Electricity y Unmitigated + NaturalGas ' y r Mitigated r r r r . r 1 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 • 0.0000 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr City Park 0 I. + + 0.0000 Total 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Page 25 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr ton lyr MT/yr City Park 0 I.4 I. 1 0.0000 Total 0.0000 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr City Park • 0 I i 0.0000 Total 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr City Park 0 i i 0.0000 Total 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail Page 26 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr • Mitigated 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Page 27 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Elio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory ton lyr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0000 Consumer • Products , r , T ,— r ± l Y T 0.0000 t Landscaping w r r r r j , - T 0.0000 } Total 0.0000 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Rio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory tonslyr MT/yr iiii Consumer • 0.0000 Products r• r- r- r • Landscaping ' ., 0.0000 r r ~ Architectural • 0.0000 Coating Total 0.0000 7.0 Water Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated : 0.0000 Unmitigated 0.0000 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr City Park 0 / 0 +: a, a 0.0000 Total 0.0000 Page 28 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated (r�dpor/Out door :and uee -„,,.. City Park 0 / 0 f. Totitt02. IVO 0.0000 Total 0.0000 8.0 Waste Detail Page 29 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Mitigated Unmitigated Total CO2 £H4 1420 • 02e 0.0000 0.0000 CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tons 1 MT/yr City Park 0 a. a. 0.0000 Total 0.0000 Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr City Park 0 a: a, a 0.0000 Total 0.0000 9.0 Operational Offroad Page 30 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities Census Tract CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Score CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Percentile Range Pollution Burden Percentile Population Characteristics Percentile Total Population California County ZIP code census tract falls within Nearby City (to help approximate location only) 6073011602 42.76 81-85% 57 94 3228 San Diego 91950 National City 6073012401 38.88 76-80% 56 87 3676 San Diego 91950 National City 6073011601 38.36 76-80% 47 92 5891 San Diego 91950 National City 6073021900 37.91 76-80% 83 61 6816 San Diego 91950 National City 1 out of 1 October 2014 0 0:5 1 Miles aa; I CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Scores 21 -30% 31 - 40% 41 - 50% 51 -60% 61 - 70% 71-80% 81 - 90% o National City DUDEK SOURCE: Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment CalEnviroscreen 2.0 Results - National City National City Urban Forestry Management Grant 60' •038170 60,13009902 03603 60 00 05 6073 j 111 6073003 1s3 6.73003109 6073011902 607300, 201 NATIONAL_,, CITY 6073011802 6073011801 6073011700 6073011601 0.5 1 Miles DUDEK 6073021900- 6073012502 SOURCE: Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment 607302200`0, sr 6073012002 6073012003 6073012102 607`3012101 ,.66730a 2303 Chula Vista 5073/12200 6 e 730'06202 6073003204 607i3Oe; "i 2 6.7� 0 0 ie iIC r,,_ CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Scores 21 - 30% 31 - 40% 41 - 50% 51 - 60% 61 -70% 71 - 80% 81 - 90% ri Census Tract Q National City CalEnviroscreen 2.0 Results - National City National City Urban Forestry Management Grant Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Urban and Community Forestry Program - Project Budget City of National City Budget Proposal Description Cost Basis Cal Fire Grant Share Grantee Match Total Personnel: Salaries estimated @ 400 hrs ($85,000/yr) $42/hr X 400 hrs. 16800 Employee Benefits estimated @ 400 hrs $8.50/hrX 40 hrs 3400 Subtotal 20200 20,200 Contractual: Tree Inventory !Task1: Tree Mapping & Assesment !Task 10,000 trees/4,000 vacant spaces $2/tree/space 28,000 2: Tree Data Assessments 40 hrs X $160/hr 6,400 Task 3: Free Evaluations 40 hrs. X $160/hr 6,400 Task 4: Tree Mgmt. Software (CalFire) Software license & fixed setup costs 20,000 Subtotal 60,800 60,800 Urban Forest Management Plan Task 1- Dept & Community Meetings Task la -Kick off meeting/data acquistion Task lb-4 city meetings Task 1c -2 community outreach meetings Task 1d - 4-mid project meetings Subtotal 34,750 34,750 Task 2- UFMP Draft 1 Task 2a- Urban Forest Sytus Task 2b - Tree Management Policies Task 2c- Tree Inventory Management Task 2d- Tree Maintenance Program Task 2e- Tree Selection Task 2f- Tree removal and planting Task 2g- Stewardship and Community Outreach Task 2h- LT Goals and Objectives Task 2i- Dept Synergy Task 2j- Urban Forest Benefits Task 2k- Canopy Coverage Analysis Task 21- Urban Forest Program Funding Subtotal 46,685 46,685 Task 3- UFMP Draft 2 Subtotal 9040 9,040 Task 4- Powerpoint Presentation to City Council Subtotal 5400 5,400 GHG Emission Tracking & Reporting Subtotal 2 yrs of reporting 32 hrs. X $160 5120 5,120 Tree Policy/Ordinances Development Policy & ordinance review and modification 40 hrs. X $225 9000 City Meetings 3 meetings 12 hrs. X $225 2700 Subtotal 11,700 11,700 Wed based Forest Mgmt system & website update Providing comments to City Web MAster 24 hrs. X $225 5400 Review Web Based Forest Mgmt System 24 hrs. X $225 5400 Meetings 4 meetings 16 hrs. X $225 3600 Subtotal 14400 14,400 Travel mileage 75 miles round trip/ 18 mtgs 1,350 miles X .56,/mile 1000 1000 Supplies repro, fuel, maps, tapes, ID books, other misc field and office 10000 10000 Equipment dataloggers, field eqpt, etc 7500 7500 Other Direct Costs 25000 25000 Indirect Costs (10%) 18,890 6200 25,090 TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 250,285 26,400 276,685 PERCENT OF TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 90 10 100 ADDITIONAL CO -BENEFITS OF PROPOSED GRANT PROJECT Value to the City of Tree Planting: • Value of one tree: $31 (Glendale, AZ) - $89 (Berkeley, CA) • Value of 4,000 trees proposed for planting: $124,000-356,000 • Value of 10,000 trees improved/maintained: $310,000-890,000 (McPherson, Greg E., James R. Simpson, Paula J. Peper, Scott E. Maco, and Qingfu Xiao. "Municipal Forest Benefits and Costs in Five U.S. Cities." Journal of Forestry 103.8 (2005): 411-16. Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/ccrc/topics/urban-forests/docs/jof Dec 2005.pdf) 40 years of benefits (proposed plan length) per tree: • Large Tree: $4,320 (yard), $3,880 (public) • Medium Tree: $1,040 (yard), $760 (public) • Small Tree: $280 (yard), $40 (public) • Conifer: $2,040 (yard), $1,640 (public) • 4,000 trees (range small -large): $1,120,000-17,280,000 (yard), $160,000-15,520,000 (public) • 10,000 trees (range small -large): $2,800,000-43,200,000 (yard), $400,000-38,800,000 (public) (McPherson, Gregory, James Simpson, Paula Peper, Shelley Gardner, Kelaine Vargas, Scott Maco, and Qingfu Xiao. "Coastal Plain Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting". USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. (2006). Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/products/2/cufr 679 gtr201 coastal tree guide. Plan Time Scale/Size: • Shade provided by trees reduces the need for maintenance and repaving. A UC Davis study found that 20% shade on a street improves pavement condition by 11%, which is a 60% savings for resurfacing over 30 years. (Geiger, J.R. and S.L. Gardner. "Why Shade Trees? The Unexpected Benefits." Center for Urban Forest Research, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forestry Service. 2006. Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/products/cufr 673 WhyShadeStreets 10- 06. pdf) • Portland, Oregon saved 43% ($64 million) by integrating green infrastructure, including planting 4,000 new trees, into a combined gray -green infrastructure. (Rosen, Mike. "Trees! Watershed Health and Urban Trees Protecting the Investment." Environmental Services City of Portland, National Green Infrastructure Conference. (2011).) Here are a few others that aren't per tree: • Tree canopy goal recommendation for urban residential zones in metropolitan areas in the dry West: 18% ("Setting Urban Tree Canopy Goals." American Forests. Web. http://ftp.americanforests.org/resources/urbanforests/treedeficit.php) • Researchers from Columbia University found childhood asthma rates were highest in parts of the city where tree density was lowest. The rate of asthma fell by 25% for every extra 340 trees per square kilometer, a pattern that held true even after taking account of differing sources of pollution, levels of affluence and population density. (Lovasi, G. S., J. W. Quinn, K. M. Neckerman, M. S. Perzanowski, and A. Rundle. "Children Living in Areas with More Street Trees Have Lower Prevalence of Asthma." Journal of Epidemiol Community Health 62 (2008): 647-49. Web. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18450765) • Trees absorb high frequency noise which are most distressing to people. (McPherson, Gregory, James Simpson, Paula Peper, Qingfu Xiao, Dennis Pettinger, and Donald Hodel. Tree Guidelines for Inland Empire Communities. Rep. Western Center for Urban Forest Research and Education, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2001. Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/products/2/cufr 52.pdf.) • The presence of trees in a suburban landscape significantly reduced the cruising speed of drivers by an average of 3 miles per hour. Faster drivers and slower drivers both drove slower with the presence of trees. (Naderi, Jody R., Byoung S. Kweon, and Praveen Maghelal. "The Street Effect and Driver Safety." ITE Journal on the Web (2008). Web. http://www.walkable.org/assets/downloads/StreetTreeEffectandDriverSafety ITEfeb08 . Qi•) • Public housing residents with nearby trees and natural landscapes reported 25% fewer acts of domestic aggression and violence (Kuo, F.E., and W.C. Sullivan. 2001. "Aggression and Violence in the Inner City: Effects of Environment Via Mental Fatigue". Environment and Behavior 33.4 (2001): 543-571. Web. http://www.outdoorfoundation.org/pdf/AggressionAndViolence.pdf.) • Shoppers will travel further and longer to visit a district with high quality trees, and spend more time there once they arrive. (Wolf, Kathleen L. "Business District Streetscapes, Trees and Consumer Response." Journal of Forestry 103.8 (2005): 396-400. Web. <http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw 2005 wo1f001.pdf>.) • Trees increased home sales prices in Athens, GA $1475 to $1750. This increase in property value results in an increase of $100,000 in the city's property tax revenues (Anderson, L.M., and H.K. Cordell. "Influence of Trees on Residential Property Values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A Survey Based on Actual Sales Prices." Landscape and Urban Planning 15.1-2 (1988): 153-64. Web. <http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja anderson003.pdf> 1. Project Title: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Urban Forestry Program ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Part 1: ADMINSTRATIVE INFORMATION National City Urban Forest Management Planning 2. Project Applicant's Name: National City 3. Name and title of checklist preparer: Markus Lang, Environmental Specialist, Dudek (consultant to City) This checklist is intended for use by applicants for California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Urban Forestry Program projects. It is modeled after the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Checklist, which has been modified to more closely focus on the types of actions and impacts expected to occur while conducting urban forestry tree planting projects. As the lead agency under CEQA, CAL FIRE must make a determination as to a project's potential environmental impacts, develop mitigations if necessary and determine the level of environmental documentation and review required. The completion of this checklist will assist CAL FIRE in identifying impacts of the proposed project prior to approval. To meet that need someone that is intimately familiar with the project and knowledgeable on potential environmental consequences must complete this checklist. The information in the checklist is meant to supplement the information provided in your application. Maps and photos supplied with your application will assist in CAL FIRE's review. This checklist is available electronically (MS Word 97) or may be completed by hand. If you need assistance please contact CAL FIRE's Urban Forestry Program personnel. It is the intent of CAL FIRE and the Urban Forestry Program to approve tree -planting projects that are categorically exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. In order for a project to qualify for a categorical exemption CAL FIRE must find that there are no "unusual circumstances" associated with the project that lead to the project having impacts on environmental resources (e.g., threatened or endangered species, aesthetics, cultural resources, water quality, etc). CEQA does not allow for a project's impacts to be minimized or compensated under a categorical exemption; avoiding impacts to resources is the only mitigation permitted. To meet that end, the following questions were designed to identify environmental impacts that may occur in various tree -planting settings and encourage project applicants to develop measures to avoid those impacts. In the event that potential impacts to a resource are identified it is recommended that the project applicant redesign or reconfigure their project proposal to avoid impacts to the resource. Failure to fully avoid impacts will result in your project requiring a "higher level" of environmental review such as the preparation of a negative declaration or environmental impact report. This could be costly and delay your project. Because of the time and cost associated with the preparation of a negative declaration or environmental impact report CAL FIRE encourages you to change your project in order to qualify for a categorical exemption. A brief explanation is required for "Yes" responses to the following questions. Responses must be supported by facts, not merely the personal opinion of the checklist preparer. All responses must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. Earlier analyses may be used where an impact has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. In this case, a brief discussion should identify the earlier analysis, describe the mitigations that were developed and supply copies of relevant sections/pages. A source list should be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion sections where necessary. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 1 of 10 Part 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Project Location: (City, County, Nearest Town, etc.) National City, San Diego County, CA Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 2 of 10 2. Description of Project: Describe the entire project, including but not limited to size and numbers of trees, size and depth of excavations, planting site preparation (i.e., land clearing), equipment to be utilized in planting and preparing the planting site (e.g., backhoes, power augers, heavy equipment), later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for the project's implementation. Emphasis should be placed on activities that will potentially impact the environment rather than describing project benefits. The proposed project would include the following components: 1) Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory- The City's Engineering and Public Works Department will utilize consulting ISA certified arborists to inventory approximately 10,000 trees. Tree mapping will be conducted using Trimble data loggers with sub -meter Global Positioning System technology to accurately locate existing trees and vacant tree planting sites (estimated 4,000 vacant sites) in the City's parks and ROWs. Purchase mobile data collectors for City. Integrate data into a Web based tree mgmnt application. 2) Develop a Long Range UFMP - The City will contract with urban foresters for preparation of a UFMP. This plan will address the current status of the City's urban forest; identify existing tree management policies; provide recommendations for editing or amending such policies; identify routine and emergency tree maintenance standards; provide design, tree selection, removal, and planting recommendations; provide City staffing recommendations; identify tree inventory management options; provide natural resource management recommendations; provide community education outreach and Arbor Day Celebration guidelines; and identify and quantify the benefits of the City's urban forest, including carbon sequestration, stormwater, and air quality annual benefits and strategies. Additionally, the UFMP will provide long-term management goals and objectives for a 40-year period that will be broken into manageable and attainable 5-year milestones with annual operating costs. The preparation of the UFMP will also involve key representative stakeholders and the communities, who have an interest in the proper care and maintenance of the trees. 3) Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances- The purpose of this objective is to evaluate and revise tree policies and ordinances for adoption by City Council that will better meet the needs and desires of the City. The ordinance will encourage and provide direction for preservation of existing tree canopy and enhancement of the canopy and tree quality through implementation of sound and sustainable urban forest management practices and planning policies. Basic tree planting techniques, species selection, tree removal policies, and maintenance standards will be included. It is assumed that a CEQA EIR is not required for adoption of an updated tree ordinance. 4) Improve City's Urban Forest Website and provide Web based tree maintenance scheduling interface for residents - Long term community involvement and education is an important component of a successful urban forest management program since the majority of trees are on private property. Providing comprehensive tree management information can help residents better manage their trees. Additionally, residents are often unsure how to request tree work, determine when tree work is scheduled, or how they can help plant and care for trees. As such, updating the City's Website will be accomplished for public outreach and education as well as providing an active tree information resource. The Web site will promote the urban forest to the residents of National City and encourage an active role in managing their own trees. Additionally, a Web based access portal for residents to gain access about specific trees will be developed and made accessible. This will enable City staff to publish select tree information, including trimming and removal/replacement schedules for residents to view. Also create, print and distribute City tree care program as educational outreach. The project will be a major update of the City's current urban forestry practices. It will include a team of ISA certified arborists, urban foresters, a Registered Professional Forester (as needed), City public works staff, City planners, and the interested public. The team will work collaboratively throughout the process, will seek public input through various means, including on-line surveys and public participation meetings. The UFMP and various policy documents that result from this project will become the cornerstone for tree and urban forest management in National City and will guide future tree maintenance budgeting and staffing practices. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 3 of 10 3. Identify the type(s) of setting(s) where your project will be located. • Street (parkways, medians, sidewalks, etc.) ❑ • Existing landscaped city/county park ❑ • Existing landscaped school grounds n • Urban trail, bike trail ❑ • Public building grounds ❑ ❑ Other similar urban or developed setting. ❑ Describe setting: Rural, Undeveloped or Wildland Settings Undeveloped land New or rural park New school grounds Agricultural land Historic district, railroad right-of-way Riparian area (within 100 ft of a stream, lake or wetland) Other similar rural, undeveloped or wildland setting. Describe setting: Projects confined to urban or Projects that include rural, developed settings must address undeveloped or wildland settings must questions in Checklist, Part 4. address questions in Checklist, Parts 3 and 4. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 4 of 10 Part 3: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROJECTS IN RURAL, UNDEVELOPED OR WILDLAND SETTINGS Projects, or portions of projects, planned for rural, undeveloped or wildland settings may have impacts on various resources (e.g., threatened or endangered species, cultural resources, water quality, etc.). Therefore, project applicants must conduct the following resource studies to determine if resources exist that warrant protection. Resource Studies: Conduct a Natural Diversity Data Base Search Contact CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program staff to determine how to conduct a Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB) Search. Submit a copy of the search results along with this Environmental Checklist. If the NDDB search identifies any threatened or endangered species of animals or plants that may be present describe avoidance measures in the appropriate discussion section. Conduct an archaeological records check Contact CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program staff to determine how to conduct an Archaeological Records Check. Submit a copy of the results along with this Environmental Checklist. If the Records Check identifies cultural resources within the project site describe measures to avoid impacts in the appropriate discussion section. Conduct an archaeological survey Contact CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program staff to determine how to conduct an archaeology survey. Submit a copy of the survey results along with this Environmental Checklist. If the archeological survey identifies cultural resources within the project site describe measures to avoid impacts in the appropriate discussion section. Based on the results of the resource studies please respond to the following questions for projects located in rural, undeveloped or wildland settings. 1. Discuss the results of the resource studies and briefly describe the archaeological and biological resources identified within your project site. NA since this is a management plan for a developed environment. Will the project: 2. Require the removal of native vegetation (trees, shrubs) prior to planting, thereby potentially impacting threatened or endangered plant or animal species or cultural resources? n Yes n No 3. Require extensive soil disturbance, thereby potentially causing soil erosion and impacting, threatened or endangered species or cultural resources? n Yes ❑ No Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 5 of 10 4. Require the use of large equipment (i.e. backhoe) thereby potentially impacting threatened or endangered species or cultural resources? ❑ Yes n No 5. Occur within 100 feet of a perennial watercourse, riparian zone or wetland thereby potentially impacting threatened or endangered species, cultural resources or riparian values? n Yes n No 6. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use? f Yes ❑ No 7. Discuss any "Yes" responses and describe measures to avoid impacts. Part 4: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR ALL PROJECTS Please answer the following questions for all projects and discuss all "Yes" responses. Will the proposed project: 1. Require approval from other public agencies (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement (e.g., grading permits, CALTRANS encroachment permits, right-of-way easements, etc.)) n Yes 1I No 2. Include activities that were identified in other environmental documents or analyses and support findings of no significant impact (e.g., CEQA documents, environmental surveys, general plans, studies, reports, etc.) U Yes ® No Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 6 of 10 3. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to general plans, specific plans, local coastal programs, or zoning ordinances)? E Yes ® No 4. Conflict with any ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation ordinance, Habitat Conservation Plan, or other policy? C Yes ® No 5. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? n Yes ® No 6. Result in trees, once mature, coming into contact with power lines? n Yes RI No 7. Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? n Yes 11 No 8. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? P1 Yes No The planting and maintenance activities included in the proposed Plan would be served by sufficient water supplies and would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies. The species that would be chosen for inclusion in the Plan would be climate -appropriate. Irrigation techniques would be specified in the Plan and implemented in consideration of water supplies and conservation policies as stipulated in local, state, and federal regulations, including Sweetwater Authority's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 7 of 10 9. Result in substantial adverse impacts to public services for tree pruning and maintenance? n Yes ® No 10. Substantially increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities or require the construction of additional recreational facilities resulting in significant environmental impacts? n Yes ® No 11.Include trees known to produce pollen/allergens/odors that are irritants or objectionable to large numbers of people? ❑ Yes ®No 12. Substantially damage a scenic resource or vista or degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ❑ Yes ® No 13. Result in, once trees are mature, undesirable shading of nearby property, including residences, offices, swimming pools, solar energy collectors, recreational facilities, etc. or subject adjoining properties to excessive amounts of litter and/or debris? n Yes ®No Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 8 of 10 14. Obscure public safety improvements such as streetlights, traffic signals, signs, etc.? n Yes No 15. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 0 This topic does not apply to this project and was not evaluated further. ❑ Yes No Would the ❑ Yes ® No Would Discuss below: project generate significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions? these GHG emissions result in a significant impact on the environment? ❑ Yes ® No Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Discuss below: The management plan would ultimately result in planting of 4,000 trees and would promote the health of the urban forest and would result in a net reduction or sequestration of GHG. If you checked "No" to all preceding questions or checked "Yes" and have provided the required Resource Studies and identified measures sufficient to protect all resource values the project may be categorically exempt from further environmental review. Sign the Certification, below, and submit this Checklist with your application to the CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program office. CAL FIRE will review your responses and determine whether additional environmental review is necessary prior to project approval. Part 5: CERTIFICATION I certify that I have reviewed the proposed project's description and inspected the project site(s). I have provided accurate and factual responses to the questions and have supplied accurate information when requesting database searches. In my opinion the proposed project will not have any negative impacts on the environment. Signatute ecklist Pr'eparr r" L/ 12 - 774 ate Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 9 of 10 Part 6: DETERMINATION DETERMINATION (To be completed by CAL FIRE, Urban and Community Forestry Program Staff) As a representative of CAL FIRE and as lead agency for environmental review under CEQA I have determined that an environmental impact evaluation for the proposed project has been satisfactorily completed. On the basis of this evaluation: I find that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and meets the Class 4 (Minor Alterations to Land) categorical exemption requirements. This project is therefore exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents. CAL FIRE will prepare a Notice of Exemption (NOE). I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and does not meet the Class 4 categorical exemption requirements; therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A mitigated negative declaration will be prepared. I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an environmental impact report is required. I find that the proposed project may have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An environmental impact report is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier DR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to an earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Sign �+ re of Au orized CAL FIRE Reviewer Qv,n Print Name Fore"/ — Title Date Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 10 of 10 5. Budget Information A. Budget Detail - Provide a specific budget for work to be done. The budget should be based on bid quotes and/or estimates from vendors or on actual costs that will be incurred. The line items listed should be specific enough to adequately describe project expenses. Use the Excel format CAL FIRE has provided for your budget, and follow the guidance in the Procedural Guide. You should note that applicants, if successful in being awarded a grant, will have to follow this budget and will only have the opportunity for minor budget adjustments. The total amount of the project can not be changed later. B. Vendor List - List the vendors that have provided you quotes or estimates for this project. A. Total estimated project budget is $276,685. This includes CalFire grant funds in the amount of $250,285 and City match in the amount of $26,400. See detailed budget spreadsheet in Attachment D. B. Vendors Providing Estimates and Quotes: Dudek Associates Consulting, Urban Corps, California Surveying and Drafting C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Describe the basis for the budget amounts listed above. Applicants will be expected to adhere to this budget (Continued on next page). Refer to detailed budget included as Attachment D Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Urban and Community Forestry Program - Project Budget City of National City Budget Proposal Description Cost Basis Cal Fire Grant Share Grantee Match Total Personnel: Salaries estimated @ 400 hrs ($85,000/yr) $42/hr X 400 hrs. 16800 Employee Benefits estimated @ 400 hrs $8.50/hrX 40 hrs 3400 Subtotal 20200 20,200 Contractual: Tree inventory Task 1: Tree Mapping & Assesment 10,000 trees/4,000 vacant spaces $2/tree/space 28,000 Task 2: Tree Data Assessments 40 hrs X $160/hr 6,400 Task 3: rime Evaluations 40 hrs. X $160/hr 6,400 Task 4: Tree Mgmt. Software (CalFire) Software license & fixed setup costs 20,000 Subtotal 60,800 60,800 Urban Forest Management Plan Task 1- Dept & Community Meetings Task la -Kick off meeting/data acquistion Task lb-4 city meetings Task 1c -2 community outreach meetings Task 1d - 4-mid project meetings Subtotal 34,750 34,750 Task 2- UFMP Draft 1 Task 2a- Urban Forest Sytus Task 2b - Tree Management Policies Task 2c- Tree Inventory Management Task 2d- Tree Maintenance Program Task 2e- Tree Selection Task 2f- Tree removal and planting Task 2g- Stewardship and Community Outreach Task 2h- LT Goals and Objectives Task 2i- Dept Synergy Task 2j- Urban Forest Benefits Task 2k- Canopy Coverage Analysis Task 21- Urban Forest Program Funding Subtotal 46,685 46,685 Task 3- UFMP Draft 2 Subtotal 9040 9,040 C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Continued from previous page Task 4- Powerpoint Presentation to City Council Subtotal 5400 5,400 GHG Emission Tracking & Reporting Subtotal 2 yrs of reporting 32 hrs. X $160 5120 5,120 Tree Policy/Ordinances Development Policy & ordinance review and modification 40 hrs. X $225 9000 City Meetings 3 meetings 12 hrs. X $225 2700 Subtotal 11,700 11,700 Wed based Forest Mgmt system & website update Providing comments to City Web MAster 24 hrs. X $225 5400 Review Web Based Forest Mgmt System 24 hrs. X $225 5400 Meetings 4 meetings 16 hrs. X$225 3600 Subtotal 14400 14,400 Travel mileage 75 miles round trip/ 18 mtgs 1,350 miles X .56/mile 1000 1000 Supplies repro, fuel, maps, tapes, ID books, other misc field and office 10000 10000 Equipment dataloggers, field eqpt, etc 7500 7500 Other Direct Costs 25000 25000 Indirect Costs (10%) 18,890 6200 25,090 TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 250,285 26,400 276,685 PERCENT OF TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 90 10 100 D. Matching Funds - List other funding sources, grants, etc., that will meet grant matching requirements. Source 1'City of National City Description Source 2' Description Source 3 Description Source 4 Description Matching funds comments Amount I $20,200 Employee salaries - $16,800; Employee benefits - $3,400 (see Attachment D) Amount Amount Amount STATE OF CALIFORNIA—NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION P.O. Box 944246 SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2460 (916) 653-7772 Website: www.fire.ca.gov Leslie Deese National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 8GG14423; National City Urban Forest Management Planning RECEIVED NOV 0 9 2015 CITY OF NATIONAL CITY CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE This Agreement cannot be considered binding on either party until approved by appropriate authorized CAL FIRE designee. No services should be provided prior to approval, as the State is not obligated to make any payments on any Agreement prior to final approval. FAILURE TO RETURN ALL DOCUMENTS BY DATE BELOW MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF FUNDING. Please contact Lynnette Short at (619) 937-1410 if you have questions concerning services to be performed. 1. ❑ Full grant agreement including terms and conditions, project grant application form, scope of work, budget, GHG emissions reduction methodology, map, and other exhibits enclosed. Print (single sided) and return three (3) sets of agreements with original signatures in blue ink. In addition, please return the forms below, as applicable to your entity, to be received by CAL FIRE no later than September 18, 2015. Return all originals and requested documents for further processing to: Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Attention: Grants Management Unit/GGRF P.O. Box 944246 Sacramento, CA 94244-2460 You may send the originals via overnight mail service (non-USPS) to the following physical address: 1300 U Street Sacramento, CA 95818 2. ❑ Please initial change(s) made on all copies of the agreement on page(s) as marked. 3. ® Enclosed for your record is one fully executed copy of the agreement referenced above. When billing for services performed under this agreement, your invoices must reference the agreement number above and be submitted to the contract manager. Thank you, Alice Miller Grants Analyst Grants Management Unit Enclosures Cc: John Melvin Lynnette Short Stella Chan "The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection serves and safeguards the people and protects the property and resources of California." RESOLUTION NO. 2015 — 159 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY FOR FUNDING FROM THE URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM AS PROVIDED THROUGH THE GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California in cooperation with the California State Legislature has enacted State of California Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funding, both of which provide funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for urban forestry programs; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies and non-profit organizations under the program, and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the City of National City desires to enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out an urban forestry project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City: 1. Approved the filing of an application for "State Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funding and/or USDA Forest Service" urban forestry grant program funds; 2. Certifies that the City of National City has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; 3. Certifies that funds under the jurisdiction of City Council of the City of National City are available to begin the project; 4. Certifies that the City of National City will expend grant funds prior to December 31, 2019; 5. Appoints the City Manager and City Engineer, as agents of the City Council of the City of National City to conduct all negotiations, execute, and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project; Approved and adopted the 20th day of October, 2015. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, number 2015 — 159, was duly adopted by the folio ing rollall vote: Ayes: ST Noes: 0 Absent: 0 Mic ael R. Dalla, City Notarized Seal: Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of National City, California, on October 20, 2015 by the following vote, to -wit: Ayes: Councilmembers Cano, Mendivil, Morrison, Rios, Sotelo-Solis. Nays: None. Absent: None. Abstain: None. AUTHENTICATED BY: RON MORRISON Mayor of the City of National City, California N ilof the of City ClerkCity nal City, California By: Deputy I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 2015-159 of the City of National City, California, passed and adopted by the Council of said City on October 20, 2015. City Clerk of the City of National City, California By: Deputy CITY OF NATIONAL CITY, CALIFORNIA COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Ca o15-5% \\o' -t-� MEETING DATE: October 20, 2015 AGENDA ITEM NO. 21 ITEM TITLE: Resolution of the City Council of the City of National City, 1) accepting an Urban & Community Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grant award in the amount of $250,285 through the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to develop an Urban Forest Management Plan for National City; 2) accepting the terms of the Grant Agreement; and, 3) authorizing the City Manager to execute the Grant Agreement. PREPARED BY: Kuna Muthusamy DEPARTMENT: Engineering/Public Works PHONE: 336-4383 APPROVED BY: EXPLANATION: The City does not have a tree inventory or a written management plan for City -owned trees located within the public right of way, including streets and parks. A management plan is typically required to be eligible to apply for capital funds to improve the City's Urban Forest. This grant includes conducting a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based City tree inventory estimated at 10,000 trees, developing a long range Urban Forestry Management Plan, updating corresponding City Council policies and ordinances, creating a National City Urban Forest webpage, and providing a web -based tree maintenance scheduling interface for residents. There is a required local match for this project in the amount of $26,400 available through General Fund fund balance. City staff has reviewed and accepted the provisions of the Grant Agreement. While the Agreement does 'nclude a "hold harmless" provision, staff has determined that risk to the City is minimal since CAL FIRE's involvement in this grant -funded project is limited to meetings, submittal reviews and project accounting. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: APPROVED: ACCOUNT NO. APPROVED: Revenue Account No. 296-06029-3636 - $250,285 Expenditure Account No. 296-409-500-598-6576 (Urban Forest Management Plan Grant) - $250,285 Expenditure Account No. 001-409-500-598-6576 (Urban Forest Management Plan local match) - $26,400 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: N/A ORDINANCE: INTRODUCTION: FINAL ADOPTION: Finance MIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution accepting an Urban & Community Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grant award in the amount of $250,285 and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Grant Agreement. BOARD / COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A ATTACHMENTS: 1. Grant Agreement 2. Resolution �Y, cvv��oVI No. rd0\S-\59 STATE OF CALIFORNIA—NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor - dpxIA OEPMRiM CAR STA'� 6 FUIf PPpiF�Oi `;CAL FIRE SINCE 1085 DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION P.O. Box 944246 SACRAMENTO, CA 94244-2460 (916) 653-7772 Website: www.fire.ca.gov September 4, 2015 Leslie Deese National City 1243 National City Boulevard National City, CA 91950 8GG14423; National City Urban Forest Management Planning This Agreement cannot be considered binding on either party until approved by appropriate authorized CAL FIRE designee. No services should be provided prior to approval, as the State is not obligated to make any payments on any Agreement prior to final approval. FAILURE TO RETURN ALL DOCUMENTS BY DATE BELOW MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF FUNDING. Please contact Lynnette Short at (619) 937-1410 if you have questions concerning services to be performed. 1. ® Full grant agreement including terms and conditions, project grant application form, scope of work, budget, GHG emissions reduction methodology, map, and other exhibits enclosed. Print (single sided) and return three (3) sets of agreements with original signatures in blue ink. In addition, please return the forms below, as applicable to your entity, to be received by CAL FIRE no later than September 18, 2015. Return all originals and requested documents for further processing to: Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Attention: Grants Management Unit/GGRF P.O. Box 944246 Sacramento, CA 94244-2460 You may send the originals via overnight mail service (non-USPS) to the following physical address: 1300 U Street Sacramento, CA 95818 2. ❑ Please initial change(s) made on all copies of the agreement on page(s) as marked. 3. ❑ Enclosed for your record is one fully executed copy of the agreement referenced above. When billing for services performed under this agreement, your invoices must reference the agreement number above and be submitted to the contract manager. Thank you, Alice Miller Grants Analyst Grants Management Unit Enclosures Cc: John Melvin Lynnette Short Stella Chan "The Department of Forestry and Fire Protection serves and safeguards the people and protects the property and resources of California. " -1- State of California Dept. of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Resource Management GRANT AGREEMENT APPLICANT: National City PROJECT TITLE: National City Urban Forest Management Planning GRANT AGREEMENT: 8GG14423 PROJECT PERFORMANCE PERIOD IS from Upon Approval through December 19, 2019. Under the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement, the applicant agrees to complete the project as described in the project description, and the State of California, acting through the Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection, agrees to fund the project up the total state grant amount indicated. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory - The City's Engineering and Public Works Department will utilize consulting ISA certified arborists inventory approximately 10,000 trees. Develop a Long Range UFMP. Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances. Improve City's Urban Forest Website and provide Web based tree maintenance scheduling interface for residents. Total State Grant not to exceed $ 250,285.00 (or project costs, whichever is less) *The Special and General Provisions attached are made a part of and incorporated into this Grant Agreement STATE OF CALIFORNIA National City DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION By Applicant Signature of Authorized Representative Title Leslie Deese, City Manager Date October 6, 2015 By Title: Duane Shintaku Deputy Director, Resource Management Date CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING AMOUNT OF ESTIMATE FUNDING $ 250,285.00 GRANT AGREEMENT NUMBER 8GG14423 FUND Optional Line Item: 3540-001-3228 Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) ADJ. INCREASING ENCUMBRANCE $ 0.00 APPROPRIATION General ADJ. DECREASING ENCUMBRANCE $ FUNCTION General Fund UNENCUMBERED BALANCE $ 250,285.00 LINE ITEM ALLOTMENT 3540-001-0001 CHAPTER 25 STATUTE 2014 FISCAL YEAR 14/15 T.B.A. NO. B.R. NO. FY 14/15 INDEX 9520 OBJ. EXPEN D 418 PCA 96245 PROJECT/WORK PHASE VENDOR# 0000014027-00 I hereby certify upon my personal knowledge that budgeted funds are available for this encumbrance. SIGNATURE OF CAL FIRE ACCOUNTING OFFICER DATE -2- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF GRANT AGREEMENT L RECITALS 1. This Agreement, is entered into between the State of California, by and through the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), hereinafter referred to as "STATE" and National City, hereinafter referred to as "GRANTEE". 2. The STATE herby grants to GRANTEE a sum (hereinafter referred to as "GRANT FUNDS") not to exceed two -hundred fifty -thousand, two -hundred eighty-five dollars ($250,285.00). 3. In addition to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the STATE and GRANTEE agree that the terms and conditions contained in the documents set forth below are hereby incorporated and made part of this agreement. a. Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Grants Urban and Community Forestry Grants Procedural Guide 2014/15 b. "Urban Forest Management for GHG Reduction" Grant Program Request for Proposals 2014/15 c. The submitted Application, Scope of Work, Budget Detail, GHG Emissions Reduction Methodology and Exhibits d. Addendum for Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) Grant Projects II. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. Recipients of GRANT FUNDS pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 4799.06-4799.12 shall abide by the provisions in this Agreement. This includes the requirement that work shall not commence prior to the execution of this Agreement by both parties. Any work started prior to the execution of this Agreement will not be eligible for funding under the terms of this Agreement. 2. As precedent to the State's obligation to provide funding, GRANTEE shall provide to the STATE for review and approval a detailed budget, specifications, and project description. Approval by the STATE of such plans and specifications, or any other approvals provided for in this Agreement, shall be for scope and quality of work, and shall not relieve GRANTEE of the obligation to carry out any other obligations required by this Agreement, in accordance with applicable law or any other standards ordinarily applied to such work or activity. 1 -3- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 3. All informational products (e.g., data, studies, findings, management plans, manuals, photos, etc.) relating to California's natural environment produced with the use of GRANT FUNDS shall be available for public use. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Definitions a. The term "Agreement" means grant agreement number 8GG14423. b. The term "GRANT FUNDS" means the money provided by the STATE to the GRANTEE in this Agreement. c. The term "GRANTEE" means an applicant who has a signed Agreement for the award for GRANT FUNDS. d. The term "Other Sources of Funds" means all matching fund sources that are required or used to complete the Project beyond the GRANT FUNDS provided by this Agreement. e. The term "STATE" means the State of California, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE). f. The term "Project" means the development or other activity described in the "Project Scope of Work". g. The term "Project Budget Detail" as used herein defines the approved budget plan. The term "Project Scope of Work" as used herein means the individual scope of work describing in detail the approved tasks. 2 -4- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 2. Project Representatives The project representatives during the term of the agreement will be: STATE: CAL FIRE GRANTEE: National City Section/Unit: Urban and Community Forestry Section/Unit: N/A Attention: Lynnette Short Attention: Leslie Deese Mailing Address: 2249 Jamacha Road Mailing Address: 1243 National City Boulevard El Cajon, CA 92019 National City, CA 91950-4301 Phone Number: (619) 937-1410 Phone Number: (619) 336-4240 Email Address: Lynnette.Short@fire.ca.gov Email Address: Ideese@nationalcityca.gov Changes to the project representatives during the term of the agreement shall be made in writing. Notice shall be sent to the above representative for all notice provisions of this Agreement. 3. Project Execution a. Subject to the availability of grant monies, the STATE hereby grants to the GRANTEE a sum of money (GRANT FUNDS) not to exceed the amount stated on Section I. RECITALS, Paragraph 2 in consideration of and on condition that the sum be expended in carrying out the purposes as set forth in the description of the Project in this Agreement and its attachments and under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement. b. GRANTEE shall assume any obligation to furnish any additional funds that may be necessary to complete the Project. Any amendment to the Project as set forth in the Application on file with the STATE must be submitted to the STATE for approval in writing. No amendment is allowed until written approval is given by the STATE. c. GRANTEE shall complete the Project in accordance with the time of Project performance set forth in this Agreement, unless an amendment has been approved and signed by the STATE under the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Amendments must be requested in 3 -5- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING advance and will be considered in the event of circumstances beyond the control of the GRANTEE, but in no event less than 90 days from the Agreement expiration date and in no event less than 60 days before the effective date of the amendment. Approval of amendment is at the STATE's discretion. d. GRANTEE certifies that the Project Scope of Work complies with all local, State, and federal laws and regulations. e. GRANTEE shall comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et. seq. Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Section 15000 et. seq.) and all other local, State, and federal environmental laws. A copy of the certified CEQA document must be provided to STATE before any GRANT FUNDS are made available for any Project activity that could directly impact the environment (e.g. cutting, piling or burning bush, masticating, dozer work, etc.). CEQA compliance shall be completed within one (1) year from start date of the Agreement. The start date is considered the date the last party signs the Agreement. GRANT FUNDS will be made available in advance of CEQA compliance for project activities that do not have the potential to cause a direct environmental impact (e.g. project planning, locating and marking property or project boundaries, contacting and signing up landowners, etc.). f. GRANTEE shall permit periodic site visits by representative(s) of the STATE to ensure program compliance and that work is in accordance with the approved Project Scope of Work, including a final inspection upon Project completion. g. GRANTEE, and the agents and employees of GRANTEE, in the performance of this Agreement, shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents, of the STATE. 4. Project Costs and Payment Documentation a. Payment by the STATE shall be made after receipt of an acceptable invoice and approval by a duly authorized representative of the STATE. GRANTEE shall submit an invoice for payment to the CAL FIRE Project Representative of the STATE. A final invoice shall be submitted no later than 30 days after completion, expiration, or termination of this Agreement. b. For services satisfactorily rendered, and upon receipt and approval of invoices for payment, the STATE agrees to compensate GRANTEE for actual expenditures incurred in accordance with the rates specified herein, 4 -6- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING which is attached hereto, as Attachment 3 — Final Project Budget, and made a part of this Agreement. c. GRANTEE shall submit, in arrears, not more frequently than once a month, and no less than quarterly, an invoice to the STATE for costs paid by GRANTEE pursuant to this Agreement. Each invoice shall contain the following information: the Agreement number, the dates or time period during which the invoiced costs were incurred, expenditures for the current invoice and cumulative expenditures to date by major budget category (e.g., salaries, benefits, supplies, etc.), appropriate supporting documentation, project progress reports, and the signature of an authorized representative of GRANTEE as detailed in the Invoice Guidelines of the "Urban and Community Forestry Grants Procedural Guide 2014/2015." d. GRANT FUNDS in this Agreement have a limited period in which they must be expended. All GRANTEE expenditures must occur prior to the end of the Project performance period of this Agreement. e. Except as otherwise provided herein, GRANTEE shall expend GRANT FUNDS in the manner described in the Project Budget Detail approved by the STATE. The dollar amount of an item in the Project Budget Detail may be increased or decreased by up to ten percent (10%) of the budget item through reallocation of funds from another item or items, without approval by the STATE; however, GRANTEE shall notify the STATE in writing in project progress reports when any such reallocation is made, and shall identify both the item(s) being increased and those being decreased. Any increase or decrease of an item of more than ten percent (10%) of the budget item must be approved in writing by the STATE before any such increase or decrease is made. A formal approved amendment is required to increase the total amount of GRANT FUNDS. f. GRANTEE shall promptly submit any and all records at the time and in the form as the STATE may request. GRANTEE shall submit each invoice for payment to: California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection Urban and Community Forestry Attention: Lynnette Short 2249 Jamacha Road El Cajon, CA 92019 g. h. Notwithstanding any of the provisions stated within this Agreement, the STATE may at its discretion make advance payment to the GRANTEE, if GRANTEE is a Community -based private non-profit agency, upon written 5 -7- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING request by the GRANTEE. Advance payment made by the STATE shall be subject to the circumstance and provisions below. Where hardship circumstances exist for the GRANTEE, the STATE will consider authorizing advance payments. The STATE will consider the following factors in determining whether a hardship situation exists: • Modest reserves and potential cash flow problems of the GRANTEE including the need for advance funding in order to initiate a project. A justification for advance payment may include items such as the inability to pay for staff, supplies, administration expenses, and to secure contractors for Project work. The following guidelines will be applied to advance payments: • Multiple advance payments may be made to a GRANTEE over the life of a project. • No single advance payment shall exceed 25% of the total grant amount and must be spent on eligible costs within six months of the advance payment request. The balance of unspent advance payment funds not liquidated within the six month spending period will be billed for the return of the advanced funds to the STATE. The amount will be returned to the grant balance. • A request for advance payment must include the same level of expenditure detail and justification as a regular invoice. All work under a previous advance payment must be fully liquidated via an invoice and supporting documentation and completed to the STATE's satisfaction before another advance payment will be made. • Any advance payment received by a GRANTEE and not used for project eligible costs shall be returned to CAL FIRE. • Advance payments must be deposited into an interest -bearing account. Any interest earned on advance payment funds must be accounted for and reported as program income used toward offsetting the project cost or returned to the STATE. 5. Budget Contingency Clause a. If STATE funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted for purposes of the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Urban and Community Forestry Grant Program, the STATE shall have the option to either cancel this 6 -8- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING Agreement with no liability occurring to the STATE, or if possible and desirable, offer an Agreement amendment to GRANTEE to reflect the reduced amount available for the Project. 6. Project Administration a. GRANTEE shall provide the STATE a written report showing total final Project expenditures and matching funds before work on the Project begins. GRANTEE must report to the STATE all sources of other funds for the Project. If this provision is deemed to be violated, the STATE will request an audit of GRANTEE and can delay the disbursement of funds until the matter is resolved. b. GRANTEE shall promptly submit written Project reports as the STATE may request throughout the term of this Agreement. c. GRANTEE shall submit a final accomplishment report, final invoice with associated supporting documentation, and copies of materials developed using GRANT FUNDS, including but not limited to plans, educational materials, etc. within 30 days of Project completion. 7. Financial Records a. GRANTEE shall retain all records described in Section 7(c) below for three (3) years after final payment by the STATE. In the case an audit occurs, all such records shall be retained for one (1) year from the date is audit is completed or the three (3) years, whichever date is later. b. GRANTEE shall maintain satisfactory financial accounts, documents, and records for the Project and make them available to the STATE for review during reasonable times. This includes the right to inspect and make copies of any books, records, or reports of GRANTEE pertaining to this Agreement or matters related thereto. c. GRANTEE shall keep such records as the STATE shall prescribe, including, but not limited to, records which fully disclose (a) the disposition of the proceeds of state funding assistance, (b) the total cost of the Project in connection with such assistance that is given or used, (c) the amount and nature of that portion of the Project cost supplied by other sources, and (d) any other such records as will facilitate an effective audit. All records shall be made available to the STATE, other State of California agency, or other entity as determined by the State of California for auditing purposes at reasonable times. d. GRANTEE shall use any generally accepted accounting system. 7 -9- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 8. Project Termination a. This Agreement may be terminated by the STATE or GRANTEE upon 30- days written notice to the other party. b. If either party terminates the Agreement prior to the completion of the Project, GRANTEE shall take all reasonable measures to prevent further costs to the STATE under the Agreement and the STATE shall be responsible for any reasonable and non -cancelable obligations incurred by GRANTEE in the performance of this Agreement prior to the date of the notice to terminate, but only up to the undisbursed balance of funding authorized in this Agreement. c. Failure by GRANTEE to comply with the terms of this Agreement may be cause for suspension of all obligations of the STATE hereunder at the discretion of the STATE. d. Failure of GRANTEE to comply with the terms of this Agreement shall not be cause for the suspension of all obligations of the STATE hereunder if in the judgment of the STATE such failure was due to no fault of GRANTEE. At the discretion of the STATE, any amount required to settle at minimum cost any irrevocable obligations properly incurred shall be eligible for reimbursement under this Agreement. e. Final payment to GRANTEE may not be made until the STATE determines the Project conforms substantially to this Agreement. 9. Hold Harmless a. GRANTEE shall defend, indemnify and hold the STATE, its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all liability, loss, expense (including reasonable attorney's fees), or claims for injury or damages arising out of the performance of this Agreement but only in proportion to and to the extent such liability, loss, expense, attorney's fees, or claims for injury or damages are caused by or result from the negligent or intentional acts or omissions of GRANTEE, its officers, agents, or employees. The duty of GRANTEE to indemnify and hold harmless includes the duty to defend as set forth in Civil Code Section 2778. This Agreement supersedes GRANTEE's right as a public entity to indemnity (see Government Code Section 895.2) and contribution (see Government Code Section 895.6) as set forth in Government Code Section 895.4. b. GRANTEE waives any and all rights to any type of express or implied indemnity or right of contribution from the STATE, its officers, agents, or employees for any liability resulting from, growing out of, or in any way connected with or incident to this Agreement. 8 -10- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING c. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to create in the public or in any member of it rights as a third -party beneficiary under this Agreement. 10. Tort Claims FEDERAL: The United States shall be liable, to the extent allowed by the Federal Tort Claims Act 28 United States Code 2671-2680, for claims of personal injuries or property damage resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the United States while acting within the scope of his or her employment, arising out of this Agreement. STATE: The State of California shall be liable, to the extent allowed by law and subject to California Government Code, Title 1, Division 3.6, providing for the filing of tort claims against the State of California, for personal injuries or property damage resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission of State of California employees while acting within the scope of his or her employment, arising out of this Agreement. 11. Nondiscrimination The State of California prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, sex, marital status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. GRANTEE shall not discriminate against any person on any of these bases. 12. Incorporation The grant guidelines and the Project Scope of Work, Project Budget Detail and any subsequent amendments or modifications to the Project Scope of Work and Project Budget Detail approved in writing by the STATE are hereby incorporated by reference into this Agreement as though set forth in full in this Agreement. 13. Severability If any provision of this Agreement or the Project Scope of Work thereof is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications of this Agreement which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are severable. 9 GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 14. Waiver No term or provision hereof will be considered waived by either party, and no breach excused by either party, unless such waiver or consent is in writing and signed on behalf of the party against whom the waiver is asserted. No consent by either party to, or waiver of, a breach by either party, whether expressed or implied, will constitute consent to, waiver of, or excuse of any other, different, or subsequent breach by either party. 15. Assignment This Agreement is not assignable by GRANTEE either in whole or in part. 10 -12- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING ADDENDUM — GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION PROJECTS I. SPECIAL PROVISIONS 1. Grant funds shall be used on projects with the primary goal of reducing greenhouse gases (GHGs) and furthering the purposes of AB 32 (Chapter 488, Statutes of 2006), California's Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. 2. Grant funds shall be used on projects limited to specific activities as described in GHG Grants Procedural Guides. 3. Greenhouse gas reduction must be calculated using a GHG quantification methodology that has been developed or approved by ARB. 4. Grantee shall report project and benefits information when requested by the State (e.g., GHG reductions, disadvantaged community benefits, energy/water savings, and other co -benefits). 5. Grantee shall maintain accurate and detailed records documenting project description, project location, and schedule, GGRF dollars allocated, and leveraged funds throughout the duration of the project. 6. Failure of Grantee to meet the agreed upon terms of achieving required GHG reduction may result in project termination and recovery of funds. 7. Grant funds used on Urban and Community Forestry projects shall adhere to the following: a. Must contain a tree planting component. b. Must be located in or provide direct, meaningful and assured benefits to a disadvantaged community, if approved as part of the project and as outlined in the Urban and Community Forestry Grants Procedural Guide. IL MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS All Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) projects are required to monitor and report on carbon flux. This includes direct emissions, avoided emissions and sequestration. All such emissions should be monitored and reported separately. In addition, the Urban & Community Forestry and Forest Legacy Program Grants have to monitor and report on other metrics. Monitoring should be done at sufficient intervals to allow periodic reporting per the specific requirements of the individual grant program. Carbon flux should be expressed as the difference between the pre -project baseline and the in -progress or completed project at the end of the given monitoring period. 1 -13- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING This will require the establishment of a pre -project baseline from which direct emissions, avoided emissions and sequestration can be periodically measured throughout the crediting period 1 on the project area. Emissions and sequestration measurements should be expressed as metric tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent [MTCO2e]. Net Greenhouse Gas (GHG) benefit of the project will be determined by the sum of the GHG emissions reductions and sequestration less any GHG emissions resulting from project implementation. All other metrics should be reported in the appropriate units of measure. The reporting requirements should determine the timing and frequency of monitoring actions as described in Table 1. a. TABLE 1 GGRF GRANT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Grant Program What to Report Reporting Frequency Report Due Urban & Community 1, 3, 6, 9, 10, Quarterly, At January 1, April 1, Forestry 11, 12, 13, 14, Completion July 1, September 15, 16, 18, 19, 1, At Completion 20 Fuels Reduction 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Completion Completion Reforestation Services 2, 3, 6, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Completion Completion Forest Legacy 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, Annually, At September 1, At 11, 12, 13, 17, Completion Completion 19, 20 Forest Pest Control 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Completion Completion Demonstration State 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 10 Annually, At September 1, At Forests Research Completion Completion b. GGRF GRANT REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. Increased carbon sequestration through tree growth. 2. Increased carbon sequestration through tree growth and timberland management. 3. GHG emissions resulting from project implementation actions (fuel reduction activities, timber harvesting, sanitation harvesting, site preparation, research activities, etc.) 4. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from reducing hazardous fuel load potential that could lead to large wildfires. ' The crediting period is the time period over which the project accrues GHG benefits. 2 -14- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 5. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from retaining the forest and avoiding conversion to another use. 6. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from utilization of the removed trees or other vegetation for biomass energy, solid wood products or other products. 7 Avoided GHG emissions resulting from preventing spread of disease to healthy forests by selectively removing pest- or pathogen -infected trees. 8. Avoided GHG emissions resulting from research activities. 9. Estimated net GHG benefit achieved to date. 10. Estimated net GHG benefit for entire project to date [provide total MTCO2e over the project life]. 11. Project status [provide one of the following: (a) started during reporting period; or (b) in progress.] 12. Project activities completed [e.g., milestones achieved]. 13. Additional project benefits and results [if applicable, provide estimated totals, if available, or qualitative descriptions, of the following: (a) vehicle miles traveled reductions; (b) open space or greenbelt creation or preservation; (c) wildlife habitat preservation; (d) tons of biomass generated from forest easements and delivered to a renewable energy facility; (e) tons of harvested wood generated from forest easements and delivered to a mill; and (f) property acquired to be repurposed as an urban forestry project site.] 14. Number of trees planted and location. 15. Vegetation planted and location. 16. Maintenance activities conducted. 17. Verification that the land is still being managed in accordance with the terms of the forest conservation easement. 18. Verification that the site is still being maintained in accordance with the terms of the grant agreement. 19. At completion, summarize project accomplishments, including benefits to disadvantaged communities. 3 -15- GRANT NUMBER 8GG14423 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY URBAN FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING 20. At completion, summarize co -benefits for entire project [if applicable, e.g., vehicle miles traveled reductions; open space creation or preservation; wildlife habitat preservation]. III. PROGRAM ACKNOWLEDGEMENT/RECOGNITION All projects funded both fully and partially by the GGRF must clearly display, identify and label themselves as being part of the "California Climate Investments" program. The acknowledgement must contain the "California Climate Investments" and CAL FIRE logos as well as the following statement: "Funding for this project provided by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as part of the California Climate Investments Program." A draft of the acknowledgement must be approved by the STATE prior to publication. 4 -16- 2014/2015 Urban & Community Forestry GGRF Grant Proerams PROJECT APPLICATION Fill out the form completely. Please see the submittal instructions at the bottom of the form. The Project Tracking Number requested is listed in the letter of invitation you received. CAL FIRE Project Tracking Number:'14-GHG-UF-01-MGMT-0002 Name of OrganizationlNational City Project Title National City Urban Forest Management Planning Project Type !Management Activities For GHG Reduction Requested Grant $ $250,285.00 i Matching $ j $26,400.00 Primary Source of Other(will explanation) Technical Advice require ex lanattion (if required): Total Project$ $276,685.00 The City would contract for required specialty services (arborist, forester) and use in-house staff. Dudek Consulting advised on this proposal. Professional's First Name kuna Professional's Last Namekvluthusamy 1. Applicant information - Eligible applicants include cities, counties, qualifying districts, or nonprofit organizations qualified under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Type of Organization 'City Explanation Primary Project Contact information First Name 'Leslie Last Name 'Deese Email IIdeese@nationalcityca.gov Phone Number) (619) 336-4240 Address 1 11243 National City Boulevard Address 2 I City (National City CountylSan Diego State 'California Zip Code I91950-4301 Secondary Project Contact Information First Name kuna Last Name IMuthusamy Email Ikmuthusamy@nationalcityca.gov Phone Number' (619) 336-4383 Address 1 11243 National City Boulevard Address 2 I City 'National City CountylSan Diego State 'California Zip Code j9195O4301 2. Location information - List the cities/neighborhoods served by the project. National City will be directly served. Additionally, benefits will be realized by local and international communities since National City is located 5 miles south of downtown San Diego, on San Diego Bay in Southern San Diego County, and 10 mies north of Baja California, Mexico. _17_ 3. Partner information - List primary project partners or co-sponsors Name of Organization 1'Urban Corps of San Diego First Name ITy Last Name 'Sterns Partner Contact Title (Landscape Architect & Design Build Manager Email tstemsOurbancorps.org Phone Number (619) 235-6884 Comments 'phone extension 3210 Name of Organization 2 I First Name I Last Name Partner Contact Title Email Phone Numbe Comments List Any Additional Partner Organization 4. Narrative - Describe the project by answering the questions below. Please be thorough, but concise with your answers. You should refer to the grant guidelines document, grant program Request For Proposals (RFP), the CA Urban Forestry Act (PRC Sections 4799.06 - 4799.12) and the CAL FIRE website for guidance on parts 4A - 4E. A. GHG Methodology, reporting and tracking. Describe the methods used to quantify GHG reductions over a' least 40 years. How will GHG be reported and tracked for this project? Continued on next page. Due to space limitations the below is an abbreviated discussion of GHG methodology, reporting and tracking. A more detailed version of this discussion is provided in Attachment A along with modeling results and supporting data. The greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits calculated for this proposal are derived from anticipated planting of 4,000 trees in vacant planting sites, which is expected to occur over a 40-year period. Development of an urban forest management plan will also result in GHG benefits by outlining practices that will maintain a healthy urban forest, minimize mortality, and promote tree replacement. The GHG values presented below were calculated using the USDA Forest Service Urban Tree Carbon Calculator (for sequestered and avoided values) and the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) (for emissions values) and provide estimates at 40 years following planting. Using the Tree Carbon Calculator, the Total CO2 Stored value (kg/tree) was calculated for ten representative tree species that would be likely planting candidates in the City. Each of the ten calculated Total CO2 Stored values was then multiplied by 400, assuming an even distribution of tree species across the 4,000 trees planted. The Total CO2 Stored values for all 4,000 trees were added together to present the Estimate of GHG Sequestered value identified below. The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) value (kg/tree) was also calculated for the ten representative tree species. It was assumed that 25-percent of the planted trees would be planted in each azimuth location (north, south, east, or west) and that trees would be planted between 20 and 40 feet from a structure. The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) values for all 4,000 trees were then added together to present the Estimate of GHG Avoided value included below. CalEEMod was used to calculate estimated project emissions. The emissions total includes calculations for tree planting/maintenance over a 40 year period. It is assumed that 100 trees will be planted each year and that 40 trees can be planted each day. For planting, the following power equipment will be used: auger (Tier 4, 85 hp, 7 hours/day, 700 total hours) and truck (gas -powered, 300 hp, 20 miles/ day, 2,000 total miles). For maintenance (5-year cycle, 20 trees maintained/day, 39 years (no maintenance in Year 1)), the following power equipment will be used: chainsaw (gas -powered, 8hp, 4 hours/day, 6,240 total hours), chipper (Tier4, 70 hp, 4 hours/day, 6,2 total hours), and truck (gas -powered, 300 hp, 20 mites/day, 31,200 total miles). -18- A. GHG Methodology, reporting and tracking. Continued from previous page. Additional discussion, calculations, and examples should be attached. GHG totals will be tracked and reported over the grant period using the Tree Carbon Calculator (for sequestered and avoided values) and CalEEMod (for emissions values). Project GHG reporting will be completed quarterly for each grant project progress report. Projected direct sequestration will be reported separately from the calculated value of avoided emissions. For GHG sequestration and avoidance values, the Calculator will be used and Inputs will be based on the total trees planted to date. rate from planted trees (spades, size, age) will be recorded and entered into the Calculator and the results for sequestered carbon and avoided emissions will be summed. For GHG emissions, a log of equipment/vehicles used, duration of use, and miles driven will be kept. This data will then be entered into CalEEMod to calculate emission estimates based on actual equipment/vehicle usage. A summary calculation will be included in each report. GHG reduction calculations and modeling were prepared by Scott Eckardt, Registered Professional Forester# 2835. GHG that will be sequestered by the project (t)19,871 GHG emissions that will be avoided by the project (t) 12,888 GHG that will be emitted by the project (t) 1298 Total GHG Reduction by the project (t) 112,461 B. Background and Rationale - What is the situation, condition, or problem to be addressed by the project? National City (population: 59,834 (U.S. Census Bureau, 2013 Estimate)) manages an estimated 10,000 trees and 4,000 vacant planting spaces. Historically, the City has minimally managed their trees with little focus on long-term planning. The result is a backlog/lack of maintenance of the City's urban forest since tree work is not tracked and no tree inventory or guidance for management exists. The City needs an Inventory and urban forest management plan to facgitate a proactive approach for City trees and to maximize the benefits provided by City and privately owned trees. The City is requesting grant tunds to accomplish their objectives by creating urban forestry planning and guidance documents anchored by an Urban Forest Management Plan, updating the Tree Ordinance and Park Tree Ordinance, creating a Master Tree Planting Plan (streets and parks), updating the City's website to include tree management and policy information, updating trim cydes, and to provide a web -based schedule of urban forestry activities for residents to access. Public outreach is also included. The City includes a substantial area that is within the disadvantaged communities classification (see Enviroscreen Results in Attachment B) and urban forestry management would provide benefits to these communities. National City realizes that its current tree polices, operations, and urban forestry program require review and updating to remain consistent with industry standards, evolving urban forest management methods, and so that it can provide long-term benefits to its citizens and neighbors. The City's effort to update tree policies and public awareness through inventorying the urban forest and creation of an Urban Forest Management Plan would help in maximizing the benefits of trees and the urban forest, including offsetting carbon emissions, and co -benefits including conserving energy through strategic shade tree planting, reducing stormwater runoff through canopy interception, assisting with water quality and erosion control, beautifying the City, and improving air quality and calming neighborhoods, among other benefits derived from a well -managed urban forest. -19- C. Project Objective - What are the objectives of the proposed project? The primary goal of the proposed Project is to update outdated tree policies and prepare a Long Range Urban Forest Management PI- that Includes City -specific goals and implementable objectives for goal attainment. The City is in need of an Urban Forest Managemt overhaul that this project will provide. The Project objectives, which are aligned with the Urban & Community Forestry Greenhouse G aye (GHG) Reduction Grant Program conditions, include the following: 1) Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory for park lands and street ROW. The inventory will enable analysis of species composition, size of tree and canopy width, overall health, and estimated lifespan. Utilize Tree Management Software to manage trees and inform the development of the City's Long Range Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) and Master Tree Plan. 2) Develop a UFMP for the City's Forest. The UFMP will be the centerpiece of National City's long-term, sustainable tree management strategy, focusing on urban forestry operations, policies, programs, and GHG reduction activities fora 40-year period. 3) Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances based on the results presented in the UFMP. These tree policies and procedures will be enforced by the City in order to optimize the benefits of It's urban forest and to help meet the goals of the UFMP. 4) Improve Citys Urban Tree Program Website and provide a web -based tree maintenance scheduling interface for residents. D. Scope of Work - Describe the approach to be used, the design (methods), and implementation of the project. Include who will be involved with specific tasks and justify why the approach, methods and implementation is the most effective way to accomplish the objectives. Include a description of project sign contents and their locations. (continued on next page) National City will meet each of the proposed objectives In the following manner: 1) Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory- The City's Engineering and Public Works Department will utilize consulting ISA certified arborists to inventory approximately 10,000 trees. The inventory would be conducted according to the Minimum Data Collection Attributes for Cal Fire Grant -Funded Urban Tree Inventories. Tree mapping will be conducted using Trimble data loggers with sub- meter Global Positioning System technology to accurately locate existing trees and vacant tree planting sites (estimated 4,000 vacant sites) in the City's parks and right-of-ways. The City will purchase mobile data collectors to carry out this task and the data collected win be Integrated Into aweb-based tree management application. The consulting arbonsts and City personnel will train members of partner non-profit, Urban Corps of San Diego, to assist in conducting the inventory. Working with Urban Corps will promote cost efficiency, community employment, education, and public outreach. 2) Develop a Long Range Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP)- The City will contract with urban foresters for preparation of a UFMP. This plan will address the current status of the City's urban forest; evaluate existing tree management policies; provide recommendations for editing or amending existing policies; identify routine and emergency tree maintenance standards; provide design, tree selection, removal, and planting recommendations; provide City staffing recommendations; identify tree inventory management options; identify priority maintenance treatment and planting areas; provide natural resource management recommendations; provide community education outreach and Arbor Day Celebration guidelines; and identify and quantify the benefits of the City's urban forest, including carbon sequestration, stormwater, and air quality annual benefits and strategies. Additionally, the UFMP will provide long-term management goals and objectives for a 40-year period that will be broken into manageable and attainable year milestones with annual operating costs. Census tracts Identified by CalEnviroscreen 2.0 as disadvantaged communities will be identified by the UFMP as priority areas for maintenance and plantings. The preparation of the UFMP will involve key representative stakeholders and the communities with an interest in the proper care, maintenance, and enhancement of the City's urban forest. It is anticipated that the City would contract with Urban Corps for planting trees to Implement the planting program called out in the UFMP. This is a cost-effective measure and promotes investment in the local community. 3) Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances- The purpose of this objective is to evaluate and revise tree policies and ordinances to better meet the needs and desires of the City. Once drafted these will be adopted by the City Council. The ordinance will encourage and provide direction for preserving and enhancing the existing tree canopy, improving tree quality and health, and increasing the number of trees through implementing sound and sustainable urban forest management practices and planning policies. Basic tre planting techniques, species selection, tree removal policies, and maintenance standards will be included. A CEQA ElR will not be required to adopt an updated tree ordinance. -20- D. Scope of Work - Continued from previous page 4) Improve City's Urban Forest Website and Develop a Web -based Maintenance Scheduling Interface for Residents - Long term community Involvement and education will be a key component of the proposed urban forest management program, since many trees are on private property. Providing comprehensive tree management Information can help residents better manage their trees. Additionally, residents are often unsure how to request tree work, determine when tree work is scheduled, or how they can help plant and care for trees. The updated website will act as a tool for public outreach and education regarding the City's urban forest and will provide an active resource for information about trees and tree care. The website will promote the urban forest to the residents of National City and encourage an active role in managing their own trees. Additionally, a web -based portal allowing access to information about specific trees will be developed and made accessible to the public. This portal will enable City staff to publish select tree information, including trimming and removal/replacement schedules for residents to view. This portal will be promoted by the City as part of educational outreach about the City's urban forests and the City's tree care program and will identify community benefits of trees and a healthy urban forest. The project will be a major update of the City's current urban forestry practices. It will include a team of ISA certified arborists and Urban Corps staff, urban foresters, a Registered Professional Forester (as needed), City public works staff, City planners, and the interested public. The City will put the specialty services work for the project out to bid to qualified consultants with demonstrated experience in this type of work and use in-house staff as necessary. The team will work collaboratively throughout the process, will seek public input through various means, including on-line surveys and public workshops. The team will consult the CalFire Regional Forester for assistance throughout project implementation to ensure that the Regional Forester's input is taken into account and that the project is meeting expectations and consistent with current science and urban forest best practices in the region. The UFMP and policy documents created by this project will become the cornerstone for tree and urban forest management in National City and will guide future tree maintenance budgeting and staffing practices for years to come. It is anticipated that the City will realize many of the benefits of a well-ireed city, including higher property values, improved building healing and cooling efficiericy, reduced urban heat island effects, stormwater mitigation, improved air quality, and reduced Woad maintenance costs. The project will also target the primary aim of this grant program, which is to promote atmospheric carbon capture and storage in urban forests. The planting of 4,000 trees that would be facilitated by the City's updated plan would avoid the emission of and sequester over 12,000 tons of GHG over a 40-year time period. _21_ E. Project Timeline - Provide a project timeline. Do not list specific dates or months due to uncertainty in when projects may begin. Plan on projects ending no later than December 19, 2019. For more information, please refer to the more detailed timeline included as Attachment C: Grant Awarded - 2015 Grant Agreement Executed — 2016 Conduct Tree Inventory (10,000 trees) -14 weeks total Policy & Ordinance Review and Modification - 4 weeks (concurrent with Tree inventory and UFMP preparation) Draft Urban Forest Management Plan (community meetings and draft plan) - 20 weeks total GHG Emission Tracking and Reporting 2017 and 2018 Web -based Forest Management System and website update - 5 weeks (concurrent with UFMP preparation) Meetings -throughout contract duration Project Complete no later than December 2019 F. Tree Information (if applicable) - Provide the following information about any trees or plants to be planted as part of the grant project. Include information even if the trees or plants are not to be funded by CAL FIRE. Species List - Provide a list of the tree and plant species for this grant project . include common name, Genus, and species. Include the approximate number of each species to be used. List minimum planting stock size for each species. The proposed project would conduct an inventory, prepare an UFMP, update the City's urban forestry policies and ordinances, and create a web portal for use by the City and the public for information about trees and urban forestry activities in the City. This work would lead to the planting of 4,000 trees in the city over a 40-year time period. Trees and planting would be funded by the City or other non -grant funding mechanisms. The ten species anticipated to be candidates for planting and which were used to calculate GHG benefits of the project are as follows: Deodar cedar (Cedrus deodara), camphor tree (Cinnamomum camphora), redflower gum (Corymbiaficifolia), Indian laurel fig (Ficus microcarpa), southern magnolia (Magnolia grandtflora), New Zealand Christrnastree (Metrosideros excelsa), paperbark (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Canary Island pine (Pinus canariensis), Victorian box (Pittosporum undulatum), and London plane tree (Platanus x acerifolia) It is assumed that approximately 400 of each species would be planted over the 40-year timeframe resulting in a total of 4,000 trees. These are assumed to be 3-year-old trees (15-gallon containers). It should be noted that grant funding does not directly plant trees but would promote and establish a program of planting for the City for many years to come. Total Protect Trees: 4,000 j Total CAL FIRE Funded: n G. Other deliverables. List all other project deliverables and quantities to be funded by CAL FIRE, as well as overall project totals. Project deliverables include the four items identified under Sections C and D, above. This includes an Inventory, UFMP, updated policies and ordinances for management of the urban forest and trees in the city, and an interactive web portal for use by City staff and the public. The city would also track and annually report GHG benefits to CalFire. -22- 5. Budget Information A. Budget Detail - Provide a specific budget for work to be done. The budget should be based on bid quotes and/or estimates from vendors or on actual costs that will be incurred. The line items listed should be specific enough to adequately describe project expenses. Use the Excel format CAL FIRE has provided for your budget, and follow the guidance in the Procedural Guide. You should note that applicants, if successful in being awarded a grant, will have to follow this budget and will only have the opportunity for minor budget adjustments. The total amount of the project can not be changed later. B. Vendor List - List the vendors that have provided you quotes or estimates for this project. A. Total estimated project budget is $276,685. This includes CalFire grant funds In the amount of $250,265 and City match in the amount of $26,400. See detailed budget spreadsheet in Attachment D. B. Vendors Providing Estimates and Quotes: Dudek Associates Consulting, Urban Corps, California Surveying and Drafting C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Describe the basis for the budget amounts listed above. Applicants will be expected to adhere to this budget (Continued on next page). Refer to detailed budget included as Attachment D Gnsrdrousa Gas Reduction Fund Urban and Community Forestry Program - Probe budget city of Plu iami City Mds•tProposal OMaiptba Coat Mai Gel Firs Grant Slane ereites Teo.E Medi Personnel Wanes estimated m 400 hrs ISBS,000/Yri fr42fte X 400 hrs. 16800 Employee Benefits estimated illt 400 as ,$850/hrX40 his 3400 Subtotal 211210 Oontraet it Tree Inventory Task 1: Tree Stepping & Assesment `Task 10.000 trees/4,000 vacant spates S2/hee/spsee 28,000 2: Tree Data Assessments 40 his X 1160/hr g 6,400l Task 3. ,Tree Evelushons 40 his. X $160/hr I 6,400 Task 4 Tres Ntgnrt. Software tColFtse I Software license & fixed setup CVcts I 20,000 _ _. . Subtotal Epp Urban Tana tlilaeaTe,eent PPart I laic 1-`loch A t' onwritieay Meatuses Task le-ILd' off meeting/date acqustion ak 1b 4 mertRe+c n ask lc -2 community outreach meetings iasi ad-4-mid project rne8tyigs Subtotal_ 34,750 34,750 Task a- Uad' Daft 1 4 r Task 2e- Urban Forest Syria _I Task 2b -Tree Manegearont Policies Task 2e- Tree Inventory Manegemertt Task 2d- Tree Maintenance Protean Task le- Tree Selection Task2f-Tire removal and planting Task 2g-whipand Community Outreach i Task 2h- LT boas and Objectives Task 21- Dept Synergy "Usk 21- Urban Forest Benefits Task 28-Canopy Lounge Analysis "Task 2l- urban Forest Program Funding Sebtote 45.653 hie* 3• Uillrl3F Draft 2 Subtotal 9040 9,040 -23- C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Continued from previous page kink 4-Paew+polstPesisatettoe/e@ytam& Subtotal 5400 5/(Om •HG 6r a TFsdttg dat& artIIE fabtatal 2 yreparOng re of 321as. X 5160 5120 5,s26 I Ps5q/Ordtaaoaes Ds ls1I meet Ns TooCcy t ardlne ee review and modiflcation 40 tn. X $225 9000 City Meeting( 9meetings 12res. X$2ffi 2N0 9abbe4at =1.� gttsa band Farad Miro(eynt re & umbel* epoebe 9Caddingwncvnc;SteOty ebkLtAer 24tes.X$225 5100 Revitw Pleb Steed Forret MEmt Wen, 24 tn. X $225 5400 ,r0rld 4 meatfr 16 ley X $225 9E00 Subtotal 14400 14.400 75 nibs round trip] 16 mtos 1,150 inlet X 56/mlk MO reap kvea rapsa. Jai, main. tapes, 1D books, other rn;sc field and office wood 1 B Einunteset detelglgers, need evpt. etc 2500 Mar Mott Coin 25000 tsliattads {10eo Keel taw 25 TOTAL GRANT RIOIECT COST 250,2E5 26,400 2 1 PERCENTOF TOTAL GRANT PROJECTCOST SO 101 D. Matching Funds - List other funding sources, grants, etc., that will meet grant matching requirements. Source 1 ICity of National City Amount I $20,200 Description Employee salaries - $16,800; Employee benefits - $3,400 (see Attachment D) Source 2 Description Amount Source 3 Description Source 4 r Description Amount Amount Matching funds comments 6. Other Project Benefits - List other quantifiable benefits of the project (co -benefits). Please show how the measurement of these co -benefits was derived. Attachments can be provided as necessary. See Attachment E for full citations and additional co -benefits. Value to the City of 4,000 additional trees planted: $124,000-356,000; Value of 10,000 trees improved/maintained in the existing urban forest $310,000-890,000; The UFMP would protect and enhance the value of the urban forest resource in National City. Over 40 years 10,000 trees could reap $2.8 to $43 million in benefits A healthy urban forest could reduce infrastructure maintenance needs. A UC Davis study found that 20% shade on a street improves pavement condition by 11%, which is a 60% savings for resurfacing over 30 years. Portland, Oregon saved 43% ($64 million) by integrating green Infrastructure, including planting 4,000 new trees, into a combined gray -green infrastructure. Stormwater runoff/flooding benefits: a mature tree can store 50-100 gallons of water during large storms which equates to 200,000-400,000 gallons stored per storm (4,000 trees) and 500,000-1,000,000 gallons for 10,000 trees. Health and quality of life benefits: various studies showed a lower rate of asthma (25% lower for every 340 trees per square kilometer); attenuation of noise in the urban environment, 25% reduction in domestic aggression and violence; Traffic Calming/Safety: average 3 mph reduction in vehicle speeds in treed areas; Economic: positive consumer response in areas with trees, increased property values and tax revenues for the City. 7. Certifications & Forms- The following certifications must be filled out and signed by the appropriate person. A. Certification of Party Responsible For Maintenance (if trees/plants to be planted or cared for in project) Appropriate representative Leslie Deese certify that the Appropriate agency National City will provide or be responsible for 100% of the maintenance for a minimum of 3 years after the end of the grant period in accordance with ANSI A-300 tree care standards, the accompanying ISA Best Management Practices and the standards outlined in the grant agreement and/or grant attachments with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. Signature Title City Manager, City of National City Date April29, 2015 IPhone Number 619-3364240 B. Statement of Compliance With All Applicable Laws (all projects must fill out and sign) Appropriate representative !Leslie Deese certify that the Appropriate agencyp lational City will abide by all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, regulations and policies In carrying out this State bond -funded project. Failure to do so will lead to cancellation of the grant award. Signature 1�. Title City Manager, National City DatelApril 29, 2015 Phone Number 619-336-4240 -25- C. Recycling Certification (all projects must fill out and sign) - This certification applies to all state contracts end, to the extent feasible, all federally funded contracts. Contractor certifies under penalty of perjury that percent so of the minimum, if not exact, percentage of recycled content, both post consumer waste and secondary waste as defined in the Public Contract Code, Sections 12616 and 12200, in materia'- goods, or supplies offered or products used in performance of this Agreement, regardless of whether the product meets the required recycled product percentages defined in the Public Contract Code, Sections 12161 and 12200. Contractor may certit that the product contains zero recycled content. (PCC 10233, 10308.5, 10354) Signature DatelApril 29, 2015 Title City Manager, National City Phone Number D. Checklist of Necessary Forms To Be Completed. CAL FIRE Urban Forestry Program Environmental Checklist jx State of California Payee Data Record (Std. 204) 15? Governing Body Resolution (must follow sample format) l— Representative project area maps w/ sign locations shown r Project sign schematic (including CAL ARE logo) jx Other: 619-336-4240 Some may not be applicable to your project. J State of California Non -Discrimination Compliance (Std. 19) ! State of California Drug -Free Workplace Certification (Std. 21) 5-10 representative site photos 1 Letters of participation from listed partners jx Urban and Community Forestry Project Budget F Additional GHG Methods, Calculations, Tracking information. r Proof of CalEnviroScreen 2.0 community designation. List other lAtt ht - References; attachments: SIGNATURE: The authorized primary project contact for the applying organization must sign below. This must be the person, or person holding the position, that Is mentioned in the required governing body resolution, and the same person or position signing all of the other required forms. The signature indicates that, to the best of the signer's knowledge, all of the information provided in this application and all attached required forms and documents is accurate and correct. The signer additionally acknowledges that they have read and understand the grant program RFF and the Procedural Guide common to all of the CAL FIRE Urban & Community Forestry grant programs. Signature Printed Name (Leslie Deese Title City Manager, National City Date April 29, 2015 Please fill out this form completely. Be sure to save a copy of this form for your records. Submit one (1) electronic copy In the finable PDF format with all supporting materials to CALFIREGrants ire.ca.aov. Please use "U&CF GGRF Project Application" in the E-mail subject line and Include yourself as a cc. Your CC will be proof of your submittal. In addition, submit one (1) hard copy with signatures and all supporting materials to : California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Attention: Grants Management Unit/Urban and Community Forestry Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Grant, P.O. Box 944246, Sacramento, CA 94244-2460. Both hard copy and electronic copy must be postmarked no later than the due date in the Invitation letter you received. If you would like to mail the hard copy via expedltedlovernight mail, please E-mail CALAREGrantsfttire.ca Gov for physical mailing address. CAL FIRE Urban & Community Forestry Program GHG Reduction Grants -26- GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION / BENEFIT CALCULATIONS GHG Sequestered Species Age CO2 Sequestration (kg/tree) Total CO2 Stored (kg/tree) Tree Qty Total CO2 (kg) Total CO2 (t) CICA EUFI81 FIMI MAGR MEEX M EQU PICA PIUN PLAC 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 232.3 111.9 332 42.3 50.8 48.5 71 88.2 0 48.3 4043.4 2740.7 3871.6 1558.5 1056.6 1591.4 1508.8 3269.9 2520.9 2515.9 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 1617360 1096280 1548640 623400 422640 636560 603520 1307960 1008360 1006360 1617.36 1096.28 1548.64 623.4 422.64 636.56 603.52 1307.96 1008.36 1006.36 Total GHG Sequestered 9871080 9871.08 GHG Avoided East: GHG Avoided Tree Qty South: GHG Avoided Tree Qty West: GHG Avoided Tree Qty North: GHG Avoided Tree Qty Sum Sum CO2E (kg/tree) CO2E (kg/tree) CO2E (kg/tree) CO2E '(kg/tree) (kg) (t) 868.9 514.6 693 606.1 646.1 607.6 1350.3 369.4 1503.1 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 918 518.9 674.7 587.9 621.1 600.8 1342.7 343.9 1634.9 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1840.7 1163.4 725.5 964.9 834.8 887.3 838.2 1775.4 500 1927 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 485690 295030 175900 233260 202880 215450 204660 446840 121330 506500 485.69 295.03 175.9 233.26 202.88 215.45 204.66 446.84 121.33 506.5 Total GHG Avoided 2887540 2887.54 -27- Raw Calculations GHG Reductions - East Year CEDE CICA EUF181 FIMI MAGR MEEX MEQU PICA PIUN PLAC 3 0.2 -0.2 0 0 0 0 0 6 -0.1 2.6 4 1.6 0 0 0 -0.1 0.2 0 9.8 -0.1 3.7 5 3.1 0.3 0 0.2 -0.1 0.3 0 13.6 -0.1 5.8 6 4.6 0.6 0 0.4 0.1 0.5 0 17 -0.1 9.1 7 6.9 0.9 0 0.6 0.4 0.7 0 20.2 -0.1 12.3 8 10.2 1.9 0 0.7 0.7 1.8 0.1 22.7 -0.1 15.4 9 13.5 3.5 0 1.5 1 2.8 0.2 24.3 -0.1 18.5 10 16.7 5.2 0 3.1 1.3 3.8 0.2 25.8 -0.1 21.5 11 20 6.8 -0.1 4.5 1.6 4.8 0.5 27.2 -0.1 24.5 12 23.2 8.3 -0.1 5.8 2.5 5.7 1.4 28.5 -0.1 26.6 13 25.4 9.9 -0.2 7.1 3.7 6.6 2.3 29.8 -0.1 28.3 14 27.2 11.4 -0.2 8.3 5 7.4 3.2 31 -0.1 29.9 15 28.9 12.8 0.1 9.5 6.2 8.2 4.2 32.2 -0.1 31.5 16 30.7 14.2 0.7 10.6 7.4 9.3 5.1 33.3 -0.2 33 17 32.4 15.6 1.3 11.7 8.6 10.5 6.1 34.1 -0.2 34.5 18 34.2 16.9 2 12.7 9.8 11.6 7.4 34.5 -0.2 36 19 35.9 18.3 2.6 13.7 10.9 12.7 8.7 34.9 0 37.4 20 37.7 19.6 3.3 14.6 12.1 13.8 10.1 35.3 0.1 38.8 21 38.5 20.8 4.2 15.8 13.2 14.8 11.4 35.6 0.2 40.1 22 39.4 22.1 5.9 16.8 14.3 15.9 12.8 36 0.4 41.4 23 40.2 23.3 7.5 17.9 15.3 16.9 14.2 36.3 0.6 42.5 24 41.1 24.6 9.2 18.9 16.3 17.8 15.6 36.7 1.1 43.3 25 41.9 25.7 10.9 19.9 17.2 18.8 16.9 37 2.4 44 26 42.8 26.6 12.7 20.9 18.2 19.7 18.2 37.3 3.8 44.6 27 43.6 27.6 14.5 21.8 19.2 20.6 19.5 37.6 5.3 45.3 28 44.4 28.5 16.3 22.7 20.1 21.5 20.8 37.9 6.9 45.9 ImmOV 29 45.3 29.4 17.7 23.6 21.1 22.4 22 38.2 8.7 46.5 30 46.1 30.3 19.3 24.4 22 23.2 23.3 38.5 11 47.1 31 46.9 31.1 20.8 25.3 23 24.1 24.6 38.8 13.5 47.6 32 47.7 32 22.3 26.1 23.9 24.9 25.8 39 16.2 48.1 33 48.6 32.9 23.9 26.9 24.8 25.4 27.1 39.2 19 48.6 34 49.4 33.7 25.5 27.7 25.7 25.9 28.2 39.4 22 49.1 35 50.2 34.5 26.9 28.4 26.6 26.4 28.7 39.6 24.1 49.6 36 50.9 35.3 28.4 29.2 27.2 26.8 29.2 39.8 26 50 37 51.4 36.2 29.8 29.9 27.8 27.3 29.8 39.9 28 50.4 38 51.9 36.8 31.3 30.6 28.4 27.7 30.3 40.1 30 50.8 39 52.5 37.3 32.8 31.3 29 28.2 30.9 40.3 30.4 51.1 40 53 37.8 34.3 31.8 29.6 28.6 31.4 40.5 30.4 51.5 41 53.6 38.3 35.7 32.3 30.1 29.1 31.9 40.6 30.4 51.8 42 54.1 38.8 37 32.7 30.7 29.5 32.5 40.8 30.4 52.1 43 54.6 39.3 38.3 33.1 31.3 29.9 33 41 30.4 52.3 1440.5 868.9 514.6 693 606.1 646.1 607.6 1350.3 369.4 1503.1 -28- Raw Calculations GHG Reductions - South Year CEDE CICA EUFI81 FIMI MAGR MEEX MEQU PICA PIUN PLAC 3 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.8 0 2.2 4 1.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.2 0 3.1 5 2.6 0 0 0 0 0 0 12.4 0 4.9 6 3.7 0 0 0 0.1 0 0 15.4 0 7.9 7 5.8 0 0 0 0.1 0.2 0 18.1 0 10.8 8 8.9 0.7 0 0 0.2 1.2 0 20.4 0 13.7 9 11.9 2.2 0 0.7 0.3 2.1 0 22.2 0 16.5 10 15 3.7 0 2.2 0.4 3.1 0 23.9 0 19.2 11 18 5.2 0 3.5 0.5 4 0.2 25.5 0 21.9 12 21.1 6.7 0 4.8 1.2 4.8 1.2 27 0 24.3 13 23.4 8.1 0 6 2.5 5.6 2.2 28.4 0 26.5 14 25.5 9.5 0 7.2 3.7 6.4 3.3 29.8 0 28.6 15 27.6 11 0.2 8.2 4.9 7.2 4.3 31.1 0 30.7 16 29.7 12.6 0.5 9.3 6.1 8.2 5.3 32.3 0 32.8 17 31.8 14.2 0.8 10.3 7.2 9.4 6.4 33.2 0 34.7 18 33.9 15.8 1.1 11.3 8.4 10.5 7.6 33.7 0 36.7 19 36 17.3 1.4 12.2 9.6 11.6 8.9 34.2 0 38.6 20 38.1 18.8 1.7 13.1 10.7 12.6 10.2 34.7 0 40.4 21 39.5 20.2 2.4 14.4 11.9 13.7 11.5 35.2 0 42.1 22 40.9 21.7 4.1 15.6 13 14.7 12.8 35.6 0 43.9 23 42.3 23.1 5.8 16.8 14.1 15.6 14.1 36.1 0 45.4 24 43.7 24.5 7.6 17.9 15.1 16.6 15.4 36.5 0.4 46.6 25 45.2 25.9 9.5 19 16.2 17.5 16.7 36.9 1.6 47.8 26 46.6 27.3 11.3 20.1 17.3 18.4 17.9 37.3 3 49 27 48 28.6 13.2 21.2 18.3 19.3 18.9 37.7 4.5 50.1 28 49.4 30 15.1 22.2 19.4 20.2 19.9 38.1 6.1 51.1 29 50.7 31.3 16.8 23.2 20.4 21 20.9 38.4 7.8 52.1 30 52.1 32.7 18.4 24.1 21.4 21.9 22 38.8 9.9 53.1 31 53.5 34 20.1 25.1 22.4 22.7 23 39.1 12.1 54 32 54.8 35.3 21.9 26 23.4 23.5 24 39.5 14.5 54.9 33 56.2 36.5 23.6 26.9 24.4 24.3 25 39.9 17.1 55.8 34 57.6 37.8 25.4 27.8 25.4 25.1 26.1 40.2 19.8 56.6 35 58.9 39 27.4 28.6 26.4 25.9 27.2 40.5 22 57.4 36 60 40.2 29.5 29.5 27.3 26.7 28.2 40.9 24.1 58.1 37 60.7 41.4 31.6 30.3 28.2 27.4 29.3 41.2 26.3 58.8 38 61.5 42.3 33.7 31.1 29.1 28.2 30.4 41.5 28.7 59.4 39 62.3 42.9 35.8 31.9 29.9 28.9 31.5 41.8 29.2 60 40 63.1 43.5 38 32.6 30.8 29.6 32.6 42.1 29.2 60.6 41 63.8 44.1 39.4 33.2 31.7 30.3 33.6 42.4 29.2 61.1 42 64.6 44.7 40.7 33.9 32.5 31 34.7 42.7 29.2 61.6 43 65.4 45.2 41.9 34.5 33.4 31.7 35.5 43 29.2 61.9 1575.7 918 518.9 674.7 587.9 621.1 600.8 1342.7 343.9 1634.9 -29- Raw Calculations GHG Reductions - West Year CEDE CICA EUFI81 FIMI MAGR MEEX MEQU PICA PIUN PLAC 3 1.3 0 0 -0.1 0 0.1 0 13.3 0 7 4 4.5 0.5 0 0.5 0 0.4 0 18.1 0 9.6 5 7.7 1.3 0 1.5 -0.1 0.7 0 21.9 0 12.5 6 10.9 2.1 0 2.4 0.6 0.9 0 25.3 0 15.7 7 14 2.9 0 3.3 1.5 1.4 0.1 28.5 0 18.8 8 16.9 4.3 0 4.1 2.4 3.5 0.2 31 0 21.8 9 19.7 6.4 0 5.3 3.3 5.4 0.3 32.7 0 24.7 10 22.6 8.4 0 7.2 4.2 7.3 0.4 34.3 0 27,6 11 25.5 10.4 0 8.9 5.1 9.1 0.9 35.9 0 30.5 12 38.4 12.4 0.1 10.5 6.3 10.8 2.8 37.3 0 32.9 13 30.9 14.3 0.1 12 7.8 12.4 4.7 38.7 0 35.1 14 33.2 16.2 0.1 13.4 9.3 14 6.7 40 0 37.2 15 35.5 18 0.9 14.8 10.8 15.5 8.7 41.2 0 39.3 16 37.8 19.7 2.4 16.1 12.2 16.8 10.7 42.4 0 41.3 17 40.1 21.3 3.8 17.4 13.7 17.9 12.8 43.3 0 43.3 18 42.4 23 5.4 18.6 15.1 19 14.3 44 0.2 45.2 19 44.7 24.6 7 19.7 16.5 20 15.8 44.7 0.6 47 20 47 26.2 8.6 20.9 17.9 21 17.2 45.3 1.1 48.9 21 48.3 27.7 10.3 22.3 19.3 22 18.6 45.9 1.6 50.6 22 49.7 29.3 12 23.6 20.5 22.9 20 46.5 2.2 52.3 23 51 30.8 13.8 24.9 21.6 23.8 21.5 47 2.9 53,8 24 52.3 32.2 15.6 26.1 22.7 24.7 22.9 47.6 3.9 54.7 25 53.7 33.7 17.4 27.3 23.8 25.6 24.3 48.1 5.8 55.6 26 55 34.9 19.3 28.5 24.9 26.5 25.6 48.6 7.8 56.5 27 56.3 36.2 21.2 29.6 26 27.3 26.7 49.1 10 57.4 28 57.5 37.4 23.1 30.8 27.1 28.2 27.8 49.6 12.4 58.2 401 29 58.3 38.6 24.7 31.8 28.2 29 29 50.1 14.9 59 30 59.1 39.8 26.3 32.9 29.2 29.7 30.1 50.5 17.2 59.7 31 59.9 41 27.9 33.9 30.3 30.5 31.2 50.9 19.6 60.5 32 60.7 42.1 29.6 34.9 31.3 31.3 32.3 51.1 22.1 61.2 33 61.5 43.3 31.2 35.9 32.3 32 33.4 51.3 24.7 61.8 34 62.3 44.4 32.9 36.8 33.3 32.7 34.5 51.4 27.6 62.4 35 63.1 45.5 35.1 37.8 34.4 33.4 35.7 51.6 30 63 36 63.6 46.6 37.5 38.7 35.2 34.1 36.9 51.7 32.4 63.6 37 64 47.7 39.8 39.6 36 34.8 38.2 51.9 34.9 64.1 38 64.3 48.6 42.2 40.5 36.8 35.5 39.4 52.1 37.6 64.6 39 64.7 49.2 44.6 41.3 37.5 36.1 40.6 52.2 38.1 65.1 40 65 49.7 47 42 38.3 36.8 41.8 52.4 38.1 65.6 41 65.4 50.3 47.9 42.5 39.1 37.4 43 52.5 38.1 66 42 65.8 50.9 48.5 43.1 39.8 38.1 44.2 52.6 38.1 66.3 43 66.1 51.5 49.2 43.6 40.6 38.7 44.9 52.8 38.1 66.6 1840.7 1163.4 725.5 964.9 834.8 887.3 838.2 1775.4 500 1927 -30- GREENHOUSE GAS CALCULATION METHODOLOGY, TRACKING AND REPORTING The greenhouse gas (GHG) benefits calculated for this proposed project are derived from anticipated planting of 4,000 trees in vacant planting sites in the City, which is expected to occur over a 40-year period. Development of an urban forest management plan will result in additional GHG benefits by outlining best practices that will maintain a healthy urban forest, minimize mortality, and promote replacing damaged or diseased trees. Since a baseline inventory of the City's urban forest has not yet been completed, the GHG benefits presented herein represent the GHG benefits that would be derived from planting new trees over an assumed 40-year period. Greenhouse Gas Calculations: The GHG benefits identified for this project were calculated using the USDA Forest Service Urban Tree Carbon Calculator (Tree Carbon Calculator) for 'Estimate of GHG Sequestered' values and 'Estimate of GHG Avoided' values, and the California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod) to obtain 'Estimated Project GHG Emissions' values and provide estimates of benefits at 40 years following planting. The following presents the methods used for determining each of the GHG values above and the results of those calculations. For the 'Total GHG Benefit of the Project' value, the following formula was used: [Total GHG Benefit of the Project] = ([Estimate of GHG Sequestered] + [Estimate of GHG Avoided]) — [Estimated Project GHG Emissions] Estimate of GHG sequestered (t): 9,871 Estimate of GHG avoided (t): 2,888 Estimate of Project GHG emissions (t): 298 Total GHG benefit of Project (t): 12,461 Estimate of GHG Sequestered: Using the Tree Carbon Calculator, the Total CO2 Stored value (kg/tree) was calculated for ten representative tree species that would be likely planting candidates in the City. These species included: Deodar cedar, camphor tree, redflower gum, Indian laurel fig, southern magnolia, New Zealand Christmas tree, paperbark, Canary Island pine, Victorian box, and London plane tree. The climate zone for the project is 'South Coast', which was entered into the Calculator. The 'Tree Age' value in the Calculator was set at 43 years, which assumes that 3-year-old container trees would be planted and grown for 40 years. Each of the ten calculated Total CO2 Stored values (one for each tree species) was then multiplied by 400, assuming an even distribution of tree species across the 4,000 trees planted (400 trees of each species planted). The Total CO2 Stored values for all 4,000 trees were added together to arrive at the 'Estimate of GHG Sequestered' value. Estimate of GHG Avoided: -31- The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) value (kg/tree) was also calculated for the ten representative tree species. Two of the factors affecting the emission reduction values are the placement of the tree in relation to adjacent structures (Tree Azimuth) and the distance of that tree from the structure (Tree Distance Class). Based on the layout of City streets, planted trees may be located on the north, east, south, or west side of a structure. Therefore, it was assumed that 25-percent of the 4,000 new trees would be planted in each azimuth location (north, south, east, or west of structure). Additionally, the 'Tree Distance Class' value in the Calculator was set to 'Near', which represents a tree planted between 20 and 40 feet from a structure. This value was appropriate as calculated setback distances from planting strips to structures in the City average approximately 25 feet. The Emission Reductions (CO2 Equivalents) values for all 4,000 trees were then added together to arrive at the 'Estimate of GHG Avoided' value. Estimated Project GHG Emissions: The CalEEMod software package was used to calculate estimated project emissions. CalEEMod is a statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential GHG emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects. The emissions total presented above includes calculations for tree planting efforts and tree maintenance efforts over a 40 year period. The following provides more detail regarding the assumptions and values used in this calculation: Tree Planting: Planting of 4,000 trees in vacant planting sites in the City is assumed to occur over a 40-year period, with 100 trees planted each year. Additionally, it is assumed that 40 trees can be planted each day resulting in a total of 2.5 planting days/year for 40 years. Equipment needed to accomplish these efforts is assumed to include an auger (for planting hole digging), and a truck to transport the auger, planting crew, tree materials, and non -powered hand tools. The following assumptions were made for equipment usage and were entered into the CalEEMod software: • Auger: A Tier 4, 85 horsepower auger would be used for 7 hours each planting day (700 total hours over 40 years) • Vehicle: A gas -powered, 300 horsepower truck would be driven 20 miles each planting day (2,000 total miles over 40 years) Tree Maintenance: Maintaining 4,000 planted trees in the City is assumed to occur over a 39-year period (no maintenance assumed in Year 1), with maintenance occurring on a 5-year cycle. The 5-year maintenance cycle assumes that 800 trees will be visited each year. Assuming that 20 trees can be maintained per day, a total of 40 maintenance days would be needed each year for 39 years. Equipment needed to accomplish these efforts is assumed to include a chainsaw, a chipper, and a truck to tow the chipper and transport -32- the maintenance crew, chainsaw, and other non -powered hand tools. The following assumptions were made for equipment usage and were entered into the CalEEMod software: • Chipper: A Tier 4, 70 horsepower chipper would be used for 4 hours each maintenance day (6,240 total hours over 39 years) • Chainsaw: A gas powered, 8 horsepower chainsaw would be used for 4 hours each maintenance day (6,240 total hours over 39 years) • Vehicle: A gas -powered, 300 horsepower truck would be driven 20 miles each maintenance day (31,200 total miles over 39 years) The resulting carbon emissions totals for tree planting and tree maintenance efforts generated by the CalEEMod software were then added together to determine the Estimated Project GHG Emissions value. Greenhouse Gas Tracking and Reporting: GHG totals will be tracked and reported over the grant period using the Tree Carbon Calculator (for GHG sequestered and avoided values) and CalEEMod (for GHG emissions values). Project GHG reporting will be completed quarterly for each grant project progress report. Projected direct sequestration will be reported separately from the calculated value of avoided emissions. For GHG sequestration and avoidance values, the Tree Carbon Calculator will be used and inputs will be based on the total trees planted to date. Data from planted trees (species, size, age) will be recorded and entered into the Tree Carbon Calculator and the results for sequestered carbon and avoided emissions will be summed. This will allow for tracking and reporting a running total of carbon benefits from the project. For GHG emissions, a log of equipment/vehicles used, duration of use, and miles driven will be kept. This data will then be entered into CalEEMod to calculate emission estimates based on actual equipment/vehicle usage. A summary calculation (as shown above for the Total GHG Benefit of the Project) will be included in each report. -33- Project GHG Emissions Calculations Outputs from Modeling Conducted Using CalEEMod Emissions Modeling Program Planting Emissions of CO2E Year Emissions 2015 4.6925 2016 4.6328 2017 4.5509 2018 4.4685 2019 4.3902 Source: CalEEMod 2015 Maintenance Emissions Metric Tons of CO2E Activity Annual Chipper/Chainsaw Use Annual Vehicle Trips Annual Total Emissions 6.7668 0.2835 7.050 Overall Project' Chipper/Chainsaw Use Overall Project Vehicle Trips Overall Project Total Maintenance Emissions 263.9052 11.0576 274.9628 Source: CalEEMod 2015 Notes: 'Overall Project calculated for 39 years of emissions. -34- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 1 of 31 Tree planting and maintenance Santa Barbara -South of Santa Ynez Range County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size 1 Metnc I Lot Acreage I floor Surface Area I Population City Park 5.00 Acre 5.00 217,800.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Rural Climate Zone 4 Utility Company Wind Speed (m/s) 2.7 CO2 Intensity 0 CH4 Intensity (Ib/MWhr) (IbIMWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data 0 Precipitation Freq (Days) 37 Operational Year 2025 N20 Intensity (IbIMWhr) -35- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Construction Phase Off -road Equipment Annual Activity, and Off -road Equipment Annual Activity, and Off -road Equipment Page 2 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM - planting period of 20 days per year over 5 years, total of 100 days; one year of maintenance equipment usage - proxy for 85 HP Auger, with high load factor per http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmd120101420r10016.pdf Median Life, Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling; NR-005d; EPA July 2010 - proxy for 85 HP Auger, with high load factor per http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/nonrdmd12010/420r10016.pdf Median Life, Load Factor Values for Nonroad Engine Emissions Modeling; NR-005d; EPA July 2010 - see year 1 Off -road Equipment - see year 1 Off -road Equipment - see year 1 Off -road Equipment - see year 1 Trips and VMT - workers and supplies Vehicle Trips - tree maintenance: 40 days/year, 20 miles/day, total 31,200 miles Consumer Products - no consumer products Area Coating - no structures Landscape Equipment - limited maintenance modeled as construction phase Water And Wastewater - no irrigation, no restrooms Solid Waste - no solid waste Operational Off -Road Equipment - ghost Off -road Equipment - proxy for chainsaw and chipper Sequestration - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - Tier 4 Auger and Chipper Table Name" Column Name _." Default Value New Value 0 tblAreaCoating tblC onstEqu ipMitigation • 4 tblConstequipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated Area_Nonresidential_Interior Nu mberOfEqui pme ntMiti gated tblConstEqu ipMitig ation tblConstEqu ipMitigati on Tier Tier 326700 0.00 i 0.00 No Change No Change 1.00 5.00 Tier 4 Interim Tier 4 Interim -36- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 3 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM tblConstru ction Ph ase tblConstru ction Phase t b I C o n s tru cti o n P h a s e t bl C o n stru cti o n P h a s e tblC onstru ction Phase tbIConstru ctionPhase tblConstru ctionPh ase tbl Constructio n Ph ase tblConstructi onPh ase tblConstru ction Ph ase tb!Constru ction Phase tblConstructio n Phase tblConstru ctio nPh ase tblConstruction Phase tblConstruction Ph as e tblC onstru ctionPhase tbl Lan dscape Equipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment NumDays • • NumDays 4 8.00 • NumDays { NumDays 8.00 NumDays • 5.00 i NumDays 8.00 PhaseEndDate 7/10/2015 t PhaseEndDate 7/8/2016 t PhaseEndDate 7/7/2017 t PhaseEndDate 7/6/2018 PhaseEndDate 8/2/2019 1 4- 4• PhaseStartDate 6/13/2015 PhaseStartDate 6/11/2016 f PhaseStartDate 6/10/2017 + PhaseStartDate 6/11/2018 t • PhaseStartDate 6/8/2019 i- { NumberSummerDays 180 {• LoadFactor -.S. 0.37 1 i LoadFactor 0.37 1 LoadFactor 0.37 + LoadFactor • 0.37 LoadFactor 0.37 t t OffRoadEquipmentType OffRoadEquipmentType i t OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 4 $ t OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 4 OffRoadEquipmentUnitArnount • 3.00 tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment tblOffRoadEquipment 20.00 20.00 8.00 8.00 20.00 20.00 40.00 20.00 6/10/2016 6/9/2017 6/10/2018 6/7/2019 7/3/2020 5/16/2016 5/15/2017 5/14/2018 5/13/2019 5/11/2020 1 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.59 Trenchers Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -37- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 4 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 1.00 4 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 r tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 + 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 tblOffRoadEquipment UsageHours 8.00 7.00 4- tblOffRoadEquipment 8 00 UsageHours tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 tblProjectCharacteristics UrbanizationLevel Urban tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 0.43 VendorTripLength • 4.60 tblTripsAndVMT • t tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 lblTripsMdVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 t i t tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripLength 4.60 4- t tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 r 4 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4- i tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 t tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 I tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 i tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 159 + 4 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 5,957,406.75 7.00 2025 Rural 0.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction Page 5 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Total , Bro- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year - ton /yr MT/vr 2015 2016 20, 8 2019 2020 ,— , ,— ,— , ' , ,— ,— ,— r , e ,- i y i 1 r i i 1 a j 1 1 r r ,— �— ,—------, r r , ,- M T r 4.6925 4.6328 4.5509 4.4685 4.3902 6.7668 Total 29.5018 -39- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 6 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM 2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NO, Co 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM25 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 N&o- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Year tons/yr MTlyr 2015 2016 2017 • • • 2018 2019 2020 1 i 1 r r 7 r i i T Y 1 4.6925 4.6328 4.5509 4.4685 4.3902 Total 6.7668 29.5018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total fugitive - PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Blo-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -40- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational Page 7 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG - NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM25 Exhaust PM2. 5 PM25 Total Eno- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area Energy Mobile Waste • Water • r r '— r r r r ., , 1 i 1 y r + y y y t ' } 0.0000 ' 0.0000 ' r 11.0576 r 0.0000 ' 0.0000 Total 11.0576 -41- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational Page 8 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NO x CO 502 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e -'. PM10 PM10 Total PM25 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.0000 + 0.0000 Energy { V. r + Mobile { r + T r T • + r -I— 11.0576 0.0000 Waste { + +.. + +— +— j r r T 0.0000 Water ! Total 11.0576 ROG NOx CO SO2 fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Blo- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 - - CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase _42_ CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 9 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 :Planting Year 1 :Grading 5/18/2015 ;6/12/2015 i 5: 20: 0 4i 4 2 :Planting Year 2 :Grading 5/16/2016 :6/10/2016 ; 5: 20: 4 4 3 :Planting Year 3 `Grading :5/15/2017 :6/9/2017 5: 20: r I 4 4 4 4 4 :Planting Year 4 :Grading ;5/14/2018 :6/10/2018 : 5: 20: I I 4 4 4 5 :Planting Year 5 :Grading .5/13/2019 :6/7/2019 : 5: 20: 1. 4- -I- - I- 4 6 :Single Year Operations :Site Preparation '5/11/2020 ;7/3/2020 5: 40: • Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0 (Architectural Coating - sqft) OffRoad Equipment Horse Power Load 'Factor I. Planting Year 1 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 11 7.00: 97: 0.59 I I.Single Year Operations :Trenchers : 21 4.00. 80: 0.50 Planting Year 2 =Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes : 11 7.00: 97: 0.59 IF—rr------4 Planting Year 3 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 11 7.00: 97: 0.59 : I- 4 E- -- Planting Year 4 •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1; 7.00, 97; 0.59 + F Planting Year 5 •Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1: 7.00: 97; 0.59 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Trips and VMT Usage Hours CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 10 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Tnp Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Planting Year 2 • 1 i 3.00: 1.001 0.00: 12.30 i 10.001 20.00:LD_Mix HDT_Mix :HHDT H t t I r I 4. Planting Year 1 1 i 3.00: 1.001 0.00: 12.30: 10.00: 20.O0:LD_Mix HDT_Mix :HHDT f r I I -I I t 4 f. J 1 4 I I Planting Year 3 1 i 3.00: 1.001 0.00: 12.30: 10.00: 20.00: LD Mix .HDT_Mix IHHDT _ :HDT_Mix tHHDT Planting Year 4 1 i 3.00: 1.001 0.00: 12.301 10.00: 20.00: LD_Mtx i I t I 4 Planting Year 5 1: 3.00: 1.001 0.00: 12.30i 10.00 20.00ILD_Mix IHDT_Mix HHDT 4-----------t- -I- 4- 4- -1- -I- 4- 4 Single Year 2. 5.00. 0.00. 0.00. 12.30. 4.60. 20.00:LD_Mix :HDT_Mix :HHDT n..o.oa..ee 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Planting Year 1 - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio-CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tonslyr MT/yr OH -Road i i i 4.1712 Total 4.1712 -44- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.2 Planting Year 1 - 2015 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 11 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category - - tons/yr -. MT/yr Hauling • 0.0000 r .— •�-----� .— T • .- r , Vendorin • 0.2873 4 r r r r .. r r T Y ,— r 4 Worker 0.2340 Total 0.5213 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx - CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 ExfieusC` PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive.. PM2 5 'Exhaust ' PM2.5 PM2.5 Total :Bio- CO2' - NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 - CO2e Category - ton hr - MT/yr Off -Road i 4.1712 Total 4.1712 -45- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.2 Planting Year 1 - 2015 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 12 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yt MT/yr Hauling + a 0.0000 r '— Vendor " r r r a 0.2873 r r r + r Worker • r + -a—r • 1 i r r • 0.2340 Total 0.5213 3.3 Planting Year 2 - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive. PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBfo-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road a a a 4.1230 Total 4.1230 -46- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.3 Planting Year 2 - 2016 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 13 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO $02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2. 5 Exhaust PM25 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category - tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 Vendor •'_ '— ' ' ' " • r 0.2842 Worker r '— -- �— r T 1 r— r T , 0.2257 Total 0.5099 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502. Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10- PM10 Total Fugitive li PM2.5 '. giExhaust ---PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr - - MT/yr OH -Road • • • } 4.1230 Total 4.1230 -47_ CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.3 Planting Year 2 - 2016 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 14 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugihve Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bit,- CO2 NBid- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr t 0.0000 Hauling 1 • , ,— Vendor r , , ,— ,— r 4 ± • , ,— r ,— r 1 , 0.2e42 r , r 0.2257 Worker 1 Total • • 0.5099 3.4 Planting Year 3 - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM25 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road is i i 1 4.0544 • Total 4.0544 -48- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.4 Planting Year 3 - 2017 Unmi gated Construction Off -Site Page 15 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust , PM2.5 - PM2.5 Total 6o-CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4. N20 CO2e Category ton /yr - MT/yr Hauling • Vendor Worker ' ' '— ' r -, ' ..— '— '— r -, ' .1 '— -I—r + r 0.0000 r- 0.2797 r— r ., 2 t 0.2169 Total 0.4965 Nir Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 . Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total Cp2' '+0H4= 'N20 -. - CO2e Category tons/yr,� - ... MT/yr Off -Road j 4.0544 i 1 Total 4.0544 -49- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.4 Planting Year 3 - 2017 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 16of31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio CO2 NBIo- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MTlyr Hauling Vendor Worker Total 0.0000 0.2797 0.2169 0.4965 3.5 Planting Year 4 - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM25 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category ton /yr • MTlyr Off -Road i i 3.9849 Total I 3.9849 -50- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Planting Year 4 - 2018 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 17 of 31 Date: 11 /10/201410:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM25 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category ton lyr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 • Vendor • 0.2749 r .— .— r .— .— r • . .— . . .— t Worker • 0.2088 Total 0.4836 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yi Off -Road - i r t 3.9849 Total 3.9849 -51- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.5 Planting Year 4 - 2018 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 18 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total - Bio- CD2 NBio-0O2 - Total CO2 'CH4 N20 CO2e - Category - tons/yr MT/yr Hauling • Vendor • Worker • '_ ' r ' r ' n ' ' ' , ' T • r • r , r ' 0.0000 t 0.2749 r , 0.2088 Total 0.4836 3.6 Planting Year 5 - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total :Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust. PM2.5 PM2.5 Total. Bio-0O2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20. CO2e Category ton Tyr MT/yr Off -Road i 39186 a i Total 3.9186 -52- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.6 Planting Year 5 - 2019 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 19 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM25 Total Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 ' CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr } Hauling i 0.0000 I 4,—r .4— Vendor • r T d--, T 0.2703 r r r r r r r • d— d d Worker a a 0.2012 Total 0.4715 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Eo<hausl PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NB+o-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category . tons/yr . MT/yr Off -Road 4 1 a 3.9186 Total 3.9186 -53- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 3.6 Planting Year 5 - 2019 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 20 of 31 Date: 11 /10/201410:27 PM ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM25 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Category tons/yr CH4 MT/yr N20` CO2e Hauling Vendor Worker Total • • • 1 i . T 'r y i i t T i T. i r 0.0000 0.2703 0.2012 0.4715 3.7 Single Year Operations - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bin- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Category tons/yr MT/yr CH4 N20 CO2e Off -Road 1 Total 1229 6.1229 -54- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.7 Single Year Operations - 2020 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site Page 21 of 31 Date: 11 /10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM25 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tonsfyr MT/yr Hauling 8 0.0000 ± i 7. + + +— + + +— r r r + +— 0.0000 Vendor vi + vi 8 74— r + + +— r r +— + r 1 �— + +— +— 0.6439 Worker i Total 0.6439 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2 5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bin- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road i 8 i 6.1229 • Total 6.1229 -55- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 3.7 Single Year Operations - 2020 Mitigated Construction Off -Site Page 22 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugtve PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM25 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tonsfyr MT/yi Hauling Vendor Worker T- • ,- r- r- , -I-r r ,- i + i r + ± i . r- , -.- r r '' 0.0000 0.0000 0.6439 Total 0.6439 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ' - ROG NOx - CO SO2 'Fugante PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2,5 . PM2 5 . Total Bio- CO2 NBio. CO2 Total CO2 CH4 - N20 CO2e Category tonstyr MTlyr Mitigated Unmitigated 3 ' 1 1 11.0576 -56- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Page 23 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated - _ Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT - - Annual VMT City Park 20.00 20,00 I 20.00 31,856 • 31,856 Total I 20.00 I 20.00 _ 20.00 I 31,856 I 31,856 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles - Trip % - Trip Purpose Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-0 or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or CNW Pnmary Diverted Pass -by City Park 8.80 4.60 4.60 33.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 • 6 LDA 1 LDT1 I LDT2 - MDV LHD1 'I LHD2 MHD I HHD 1 OBUS , UBUS MCY 1 SBUS MH 0.489821: 0.036204: 0.210874: 0.153026: 0.049322: 0.007389: 0.020723: 0.015503: 0.002015: 0.002209: 0.008256: 0.001515: 0.003143 §.2ApArgoetaii Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 Page 24 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM25 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/y MT/yr Electricity Mitigated Electricity Unmitigated NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGas Unmitigated • • • 0.0000 0.0000 • • • 0,0000 0.0000 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NB,o- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tonslyt MT/yr City Park 0 1 a, ta a 0.0000 Total I 0.0000 _58_ CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated Page 25 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM NatwalGe s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr City Park 0 r� i 0.0000� Total 0.0000 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated �tr Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr ♦ City Park 0 is a. a 0.0000 Total 0.0000 -59- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity's Use Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use kWhyr MT/yr City Park 0 is a. a. 0.0000 Total 0.0000 6.0 Area Detail Page 26 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area -ROG NOx CO 502 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM25 Exhaust PM25 PM2.5 Total Rio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2a Category ton lyr MTlyr Mitigated UnmitigatedF. i 0.0000 a • 0.0000 -60- CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated Page 27 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 • PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2 5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 - CH4 N20 CO2e SubCategory ton /yr MT/yr Architectural • Coating ' i _ i 0.0000 T T T T T + + -5—T i Consumer • Products in r + -5+— ----+ r + r T r -I+— i i i A Y r T T 0.0000 Landscaping + i 0.0000 A Total 0.0000 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive ` PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bin- CO2 NBio- CO2 - - Total CO2 - CH4 N20 • CO2e SubCategory tons/yr - MT/yr Consumer Products T -i— .i. T T i ' 0.0000 i i T Landscaping + + '— " +— -i—+ + '— • + ± ArchitecturalT +— + '— 0.0000 Coating • 1 i Total 0.0000 7.0 Water Detail -61- CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Oot�l OtaKK02 door -Use; 5:,:Lendllee'. City Park 0/0 i *.CO2e 0.0000 Total 0.0000 Page 28 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2013.2.2 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 - CH4 N20 - CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr City Park 0 / 0 i a t 0.0000 Total 0.0000 8.0 Waste Detail Page 29 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 -63- CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr City Park 0 1 0.0000 Total 0.0000 Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Land Use tans MT/p City Park 0 • 0.0000 Total 0.0000 9.0 Operational Offroad Page 30 of 31 Date: 11/10/2014 10:27 PM Equipment Type ' Number ! Hours/Day Days/Year I Horse Power ( Load Factor I Fuel Type 1 SB 535 Disadvantaged Communities Census Tract 6073011602 CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Score CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Percentile Range Pollution Burden Percentile Population Characteristics Percentile Total Population California County ZIP code census tract falls within 6073012401 42.76 81-85% 57 94 3228 San Diego 91950 6073011601 38.88 76-80% 56 87 3676 San Diego 91950 6073021900 38.36 76-80% 0 47 92 1 5891 San Diego 91950 37.91 76-80% 83 61 6816 San Diego 91950 1 out of 1 Nearby City (to help approximate location only) National City National City National City National City October 2014 -65- r. Miles CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Scores 21-30% 31 -40% 41 - 50% 51-60% 61 - 70% 71 - 80% 81 - 90% Q National City DUDEK SOURCE: Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment Now CalEnviroscreen 2.0 Results - National City National City Urban Forestry Management Grant -66- DUDEK NATIONAL CITY 607 08603 \6073011802 \ 6,b 607 .. p 8 0iI 6073011801 \ 6.6743009902 6073011700 .1730i 3?i):3 6073011601 ..6073012101 7,1 6073111 6073003 6073011902 6073012102 .6d730 2303 ('hit I. Vista Itral9 j Hitt' -< rtnrl .i t+,r;r Sta».i 3109 201 0712 -00 6e738 6073003204 t .. SOURCE: Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment F CalEnviroScreen 2.0 Scores 21 - 30% 31 - 40% 41 - 50% 51 - 60% 61 - 70% 71 - 80% 81 - 90% ( Census Tract 0 National City CalEnviroscreen 2.0 Results - National City National City Urban Forestry Management Grant -67- Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Urban and Community Forestry Program - Project Budget City of National City Budget Proposal Description Cost Basis Cal Fire Grant Share Grantee Match Total Personnel: Salaries Employee Benefits Subtotal estimated @ 400 hrs ($85,000/yr) estimated @ 400 hrs $42/hr X 400 hrs. $8.50/hrX 40 hrs 16800 3400 20200 20,200 Contractual: Tree Inventory Task 1 Tree Mapping & Assesment Task 2: Tree Data Assessments Task 3 iTree Evaluations 10,000 trees/4,000 vacant spaces $2/tree/space 40 hrs X $160/hr 28,000 6,400 40 hrs. X $160/hr 6,400 Task 4. Tree Mgmt. Software (CalFire ) Subtotal Software license & fixed setup costs 20,000 60,800 60,800 Urban Forest Management Plan Task 1- Dept & Community Meetings Task la -Kick off meeting/data acquistion Task lb-4 city meetings Task lc -2 community outreach meetings Task id - 4-mid project meetings Subtotal 34,750 34,750 Task 2- UFMP Draft 1 Task 2a- Urban Forest Sytus Task 2b - Tree Management Policies Task 2c-Tree Inventory Management Task 2d- Tree Maintenance Program Task 2e- Tree Selection Task 2f- Tree removal and planting Task 2g-Stewardship and Community Outreach Task 2h- LT Goals and Objectives Task 2i- Dept Synergy Task 2j- Urban Forest Benefits Task 2k- Canopy Coverage Analysis Task 21- Urban Forest Program Funding Subtotal 46,685 46,685 Task 3- UFMP Draft 2 Subtotal 9040 9,040 Task 4- Powerpoint Presentation to City Council Subtotal 5400 5,400 GHG Emission Tracking & Reporting Subtotal 2 yrs of reporting 32 hrs. X $160 5120 5,120 Tree Policy/Ordinances Development Policy & ordinance review and modification City Meetings Subtotal 3 meetings 40 hrs. X $225 12 hrs. X $225 9000 2700 11,700 11,700 Wed based Forest Mgmt system & website update Providing comments to City Web MAster Review Web Based Forest Mgmt System Meetings Subtotal 4 meetings 24 hrs. X $225 24 hrs. X $225 16 hrs. X $225 5400 5400 3600 14400 14,400 Travel mileage 75 miles round trip/ 18 mtgs 1,350 miles X .56/mile 1000 1000 repro, fuel, maps, tapes, Supplies field and office 10000 10000 Equipment dataloggers, field eqpt, etc 7500 7500 Other Direct Costs 25000 25000 Indirect Costs (10%) 18,890 6200 25,090 TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 250,285 26,400 276,685 PERCENT OF TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 90 10 100 -68- ADDITIONAL CO -BENEFITS OF PROPOSED GRANT PROJECT Value to the City of Tree Planting: • Value of one tree: $31 (Glendale, AZ) - $89 (Berkeley, CA) • Value of 4,000 trees proposed for planting: $124,000-356,000 • Value of 10,000 trees improved/maintained: $310,000-890,000 (McPherson, Greg E., James R. Simpson, Paula J. Peper, Scott E. Maco, and Qingfu Xiao. "Municipal Forest Benefits and Costs in Five U.S. Cities." Journal of Forestry 103.8 (2005): 411-16. Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/ccrc/topics/urban-forests/docs/jof Dec 2005.pdf) 40 years of benefits (proposed plan length) per tree: • Large Tree: $4,320 (yard), $3,880 (public) • Medium Tree: $1,040 (yard), $760 (public) • Small Tree: $280 (yard), $40 (public) • Conifer: $2,040 (yard), $1,640 (public) • 4,000 trees (range small -large): $1,120,000-17,280,000 (yard), $160,000-15,520,000 (public) • 10,000 trees (range small -large): $2,800,000-43,200,000 (yard), $400,000-38,800,000 (public) (McPherson, Gregory, James Simpson, Paula Peper, Shelley Gardner, Kelaine Vargas, Scott Maco, and Qingfu Xiao. "Coastal Plain Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting". USDA, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station. (2006). Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/products/2/cufr 679 gtr201 coastal tree guide. pdf) Plan Time Scale/Size: • Shade provided by trees reduces the need for maintenance and repaving. A UC Davis study found that 20% shade on a street improves pavement condition by 11%, which is a 60% savings for resurfacing over 30 years. (Geiger, J.R. and S.L. Gardner. "Why Shade Trees? The Unexpected Benefits." Center for Urban Forest Research, Pacific Southwest Research Station, USDA Forestry Service. 2006. Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/products/cufr 673 WhvShadeStreets 10- 06.pdf) • Portland, Oregon saved 43% ($64 million) by integrating green infrastructure, including planting 4,000 new trees, into a combined gray -green infrastructure. (Rosen, Mike. "Trees! Watershed Health and Urban Trees Protecting the Investment." Environmental Services City of Portland, National Green Infrastructure Conference. (2011).) Here are a few others that aren't per tree: • Tree canopy goal recommendation for urban residential zones in metropolitan areas in the dry West: 18% ("Setting Urban Tree Canopy Goals." American Forests. Web. http://ftp.americanforests.org/resources/urbanforests/treedeficit.php) • Researchers from Columbia University found childhood asthma rates were highest in parts of the city where tree density was lowest. The rate of asthma fell by 25% for every extra 340 trees per square kilometer, a pattern that held true even after taking account of differing sources of pollution, levels of affluence and population density. (Lovasi, G. S., J. W. Quinn, K. M. -69- Neckerman, M. S. Perzanowski, and A. Rundle. "Children Living in Areas with More Street Trees Have Lower Prevalence of Asthma." Journal of Epidemiol Community Health 62 (2008): 647-49. Web. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18450765) • Trees absorb high frequency noise which are most distressing to people. (McPherson, Gregory, James Simpson, Paula Peper, Qingfu Xiao, Dennis Pettinger, and Donald Hodel. Tree Guidelines for Inland Empire Communities. Rep. Western Center for Urban Forest Research and Education, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 2001. Web. http://www.fs.fed.us/psw/programs/uesd/uep/products/2/cufr 52.pdf.) • The presence of trees in a suburban landscape significantly reduced the cruising speed of drivers by an average of 3 miles per hour. Faster drivers and slower drivers both drove slower with the presence of trees. (Naderi, Jody R., Byoung S. Kweon, and Praveen Maghelal. "The Street Effect and Driver Safety." ITE Journal on the Web (2008). Web. http://www.walkable.org/assets/downloads/StreetTreeEffectandDriverSafety ITEfeb08 . pdf.) • Public housing residents with nearby trees and natural landscapes reported 25% fewer acts of domestic aggression and violence (Kuo, F.E., and W.C. Sullivan. 2001. "Aggression and Violence in the Inner City: Effects of Environment Via Mental Fatigue". Environment and Behavior 33.4 (2001): 543-571. Web. http://www.outdoorfoundation.org/pdf/AggressionAndViolence.pdf.) • Shoppers will travel further and longer to visit a district with high quality trees, and spend more time there once they arrive. (Wolf, Kathleen L. "Business District Streetscapes, Trees and Consumer Response." Journal of Forestry 103.8 (2005): 396-400. Web. <http://www.fs.fed.us/pnw/pubs/journals/pnw 2005 wolfO0l.pdf>.) • Trees increased home sales prices in Athens, GA $1475 to $1750. This increase in property value results in an increase of $100,000 in the city's property tax revenues (Anderson, L.M., and H.K. Cordell. "Influence of Trees on Residential Property Values in Athens, Georgia (U.S.A.): A Survey Based on Actual Sales Prices." Landscape and Urban Planning 15.1-2 (1988): 153-64. Web. <http://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/ja/ja anderson003.pdf> -70- ANA', 1. Project Title: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Urban Forestry Program ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Part 1: ADMINSTRATIVE INFORMATION National City Urban Forest Management Planning 2. Project Applicant's Name: National City 3. Name and title of checklist preparer: Markus Lang, Environmental Specialist, Dudek (consultant to City) This checklist is intended for use by applicants for California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) Urban Forestry Program projects. It is modeled after the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Checklist, which has been modified to more closely focus on the types of actions and impacts expected to occur while conducting urban forestry tree planting projects. As the lead agency under CEQA, CAL FIRE must make a determination as to a project's potential environmental impacts, develop mitigations if necessary and determine the level of environmental documentation and review required. The completion of this checklist will assist CAL FIRE in identifying impacts of the proposed project prior to approval. To meet that need someone that is intimately familiar with the project and knowledgeable on potential environmental consequences must complete this checklist. The information in the checklist is meant to supplement the information provided in your application. Maps and photos supplied with your application will assist in CAL FIRE's review. This checklist is available electronically (MS Word 97) or may be completed by hand. If you need assistance please contact CAL FIRE's Urban Forestry Program personnel. It is the intent of CAL FIRE and the Urban Forestry Program to approve tree -planting projects that are categorically exempt from further environmental review under CEQA. In order for a project to qualify for a categorical exemption CAL FIRE must find that there are no "unusual circumstances" associated with the project that lead to the project having impacts on environmental resources (e.g., threatened or endangered species, aesthetics, cultural resources, water quality, etc). CEQA does not allow for a project's impacts to be minimized or compensated under a categorical exemption; avoiding impacts to resources is the only mitigation permitted. To meet that end, the following questions were designed to identify environmental impacts that may occur in various tree -planting settings and encourage project applicants to develop measures to avoid those impacts. In the event that potential impacts to a resource are identified it is recommended that the project applicant redesign or reconfigure their project proposal to avoid impacts to the resource. Failure to fully avoid impacts will result in your project requiring a "higher level" of environmental review such as the preparation of a negative declaration or environmental impact report. This could be costly and delay your project. Because of the time and cost associated with the preparation of a negative declaration or environmental impact report CAL FIRE encourages you to change your project in order to qualify for a categorical exemption. A brief explanation is required for "Yes" responses to the following questions. Responses must be supported by facts, not merely the personal opinion of the checklist preparer. All responses must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. Earlier analyses may be used where an impact has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. In this case, a brief discussion should identify the earlier analysis, describe the mitigations that were developed and supply copies of relevant sections/pages. A source list should be attached and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion sections where necessary. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 1 of 10 -71- Part 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Project Location: (City, County, Nearest Town, etc.) National City, San Diego County, CA Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 2 of 10 2. Description of Project: Describe the entire project, including but not limited to size and numbers of trees, size and depth of excavations, planting site preparation (i.e., land clearing), equipment to be utilized in planting and preparing the planting site (e.g., backhoes, power augers, heavy equipment), later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off -site features necessary for the project's implementation. Emphasis should be placed on activities that will potentially impact the environment rather than describing project benefits. The proposed project would include the following components: 1) Conduct a GIS-based City Tree Inventory- The City's Engineering and Public Works Department will utilize consulting ISA certified arborists to inventory approximately 10,000 trees. Tree mapping will be conducted using Trimble data loggers with sub -meter Global Positioning System technology to accurately locate existing trees and vacant tree planting sites (estimated 4,000 vacant sites) in the City's parks and ROWs. Purchase mobile data collectors for City. Integrate data into a Web based tree mqmnt application. 2) Develop a Long Range UFMP - The City will contract with urban foresters for preparation of a UFMP. This plan will address the current status of the City's urban forest; identify existing tree management policies; provide recommendations for editing or amending such policies; identify routine and emergency tree maintenance standards; provide design, tree selection, removal, and planting recommendations; provide City staffing recommendations; identify tree inventory management options; provide natural resource management recommendations; provide community education outreach and Arbor Day Celebration guidelines; and identify and quantify the benefits of the City's urban forest, including carbon sequestration, stormwater, and air quality annual benefits and strategies. Additionally, the UFMP will provide long-term management goals and objectives for a 40-year period that will be broken into manageable and attainable 5-year milestones with annual operating costs. The preparation of the UFMP will also involve key representative stakeholders and the communities, who have an interest in the proper care and maintenance of the trees. 3) Update City's Tree Master Policies and Ordinances- The purpose of this objective is to evaluate and revise tree policies and ordinances for adoption by City Council that will better meet the needs and desires of the City. The ordinance will encourage and provide direction for preservation of existing tree canopy and enhancement of the canopy and tree quality through implementation of sound and sustainable urban forest management practices and planning policies. Basic tree planting techniques, species selection, tree removal policies, and maintenance standards will be included. It is assumed that a CEQA EIR is not required for adoption of an updated tree ordinance. 4) Improve City's Urban Forest Website and provide Web based tree maintenance scheduling interface for residents - Long term community involvement and education is an important component of a successful urban forest management program since the majority of trees are on private property. Providing comprehensive tree management information can help residents better manage their trees. Additionally, residents are often unsure how to request tree work, determine when tree work is scheduled, or how they can help plant and care for trees. As such, updating the City's Website will be accomplished for public outreach and education as well as providing an active tree information resource. The Web site will promote the urban forest to the residents of National City and encourage an active role in managing their own trees. Additionally, a Web based access portal for residents to gain access about specific trees wilt be developed and made accessible. This will enable City staff to publish select tree information, including trimming and removal/replacement schedules for residents to view. Also create, print and distribute City tree care program as educational outreach. The project will be a major update of the City's current urban forestry practices. It will include a team of ISA certified arborists, urban foresters, a Registered Professional Forester (as needed), City public works staff, City planners, and the interested public. The team will work collaboratively throughout the process, will seek public input through various means, including on-line surveys and public participation meetings. The UFMP and various policy documents that result from this project will become the cornerstone for tree and urban forest management in National City and will guide future tree maintenance budgeting and staffing practices. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 3 of 10 -73- 3. Identify the type(s) of setting(s) where your project will be located. Urban or Developed Settings Street (parkways, medians, sidewalks, etc.) Existing landscaped city/county park Existing landscaped school grounds Urban trail, bike trail Public building grounds E. Other similar urban or developed setting. Describe setting: Projects confined to urban or developed settings must address questions in Checklist, Part 4. Rural, Undeveloped or Wildland Settings Undeveloped land New or rural park n New school grounds C Agricultural land Historic district, railroad right-of-way Riparian area (within 100 ft of a stream, lake or wetland) n Other similar rural, undeveloped or wildland setting. Describe setting: Projects that include rural, undeveloped or wildland settings must address questions in Checklist, Parts 3 and 4. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 4 of 10 Part 3: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROJECTS IN RURAL, UNDEVELOPED OR WILDLAND SETTINGS Projects, or portions of projects, planned for rural, undeveloped or wildland settings may have impacts on various resources (e.g., threatened or endangered species, cultural resources, water quality, etc.). Therefore, project applicants must conduct the following resource studies to determine if resources exist that warrant protection. Resource Studies: Conduct a Natural Diversity Data Base Search Contact CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program staff to determine how to conduct a Natural Diversity Data Base (NDDB) Search. Submit a copy of the search results along with this Environmental Checklist. If the NDDB search identifies any threatened or endangered species of animals or plants that may be present describe avoidance measures in the appropriate discussion section. Conduct an archaeological records check Contact CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program staff to determine how to conduct an Archaeological Records Check. Submit a copy of the results along with this Environmental Checklist. If the Records Check identifies cultural resources within the project site describe measures to avoid impacts in the appropriate discussion section. Conduct an archaeological survey Contact CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program staff to determine how to conduct an archaeology survey. Submit a copy of the survey results along with this Environmental Checklist. If the archeological survey identifies cultural resources within the project site describe measures to avoid impacts in the appropriate discussion section. Based on the results of the resource studies please respond to the following questions for projects located in rural, undeveloped or wildland settings. 1. Discuss the results of the resource studies and briefly describe the archaeological and biological resources identified within your project site. NA since this is a management plan for a developed environment. Will the project: 2. Require the removal of native vegetation (trees, shrubs) prior to planting, thereby potentially impacting threatened or endangered plant or animal species or cultural resources? n Yes n No 3. Require extensive soil disturbance, thereby potentially causing soil erosion and impacting, threatened or endangered species or cultural resources? ❑ Yes n No Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 5 of 10 -75- 4. Require the use of large equipment (i.e. backhoe) thereby potentially impacting threatened or endangered species or cultural resources? ❑ Yes E No 5. Occur within 100 feet of a perennial watercourse, riparian zone or wetland thereby potentially impacting threatened or endangered species, cultural resources or riparian values? n Yes ❑ No 6. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use? n Yes C No 7. Discuss any "Yes" responses and describe measures to avoid impacts. Part 4: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR ALL PROJECTS Please answer the following questions for all projects and discuss all "Yes" responses. Will the proposed project: 1. Require approval from other public agencies (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement (e.g., grading permits, CALTRANS encroachment permits, right-of-way easements, etc.)) ❑ Yes ® No 2. Include activities that were identified in other environmental documents or analyses and support findings of no significant impact (e.g., CEQA documents, environmental surveys, general plans, studies, reports, etc.) ❑ Yes ®No Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 6 of 10 3. Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to general plans, specific plans, local coastal programs, or zoning ordinances)? ❑ Yes RI No 4. Conflict with any ordinances protecting biological resources, such as tree preservation ordinance, Habitat Conservation Plan, or other policy? n Yes II No 5. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ❑ Yes ® No 6. Result in trees, once mature, coming into contact with power lines? Yes ®No 7. Expose people or structures to the risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? ❑ Yes ® No 8. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Yes Z No The planting and maintenance activities included in the proposed Plan would be served by sufficient water supplies and would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies. The species that would be chosen for inclusion in the Plan would be climate -appropriate. Irrigation techniques would be specified in the Plan and implemented in consideration of water supplies and conservation policies as stipulated in local, state, and federal regulations, including Sweetwater Authority's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 7 of 10 -77- 9. Result in substantial adverse impacts to public services for tree pruning and maintenance? n Yes ® No 10. Substantially increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities or require the construction of additional recreational facilities resulting in significant environmental impacts? E Yes ® No 11.Include trees known to produce pollen/allergens/odors that are irritants or objectionable to large numbers of people? fl Yes ® No 12. Substantially damage a scenic resource or vista or degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? ❑ Yes ® No 13. Result in, once trees are mature, undesirable shading of nearby property, including residences, offices, swimming pools, solar energy collectors, recreational facilities, etc. or subject adjoining properties to excessive amounts of litter and/or debris? ❑ Yes ®No Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 8 of 10 14. Obscure public safety improvements such as streetlights, traffic signals, signs, etc.? Yes' No 15. Greenhouse Gas Emissions ❑ This topic does not apply to this project and was not evaluated further. ❑ Yes ® No Would the project generate significant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions? ❑ Yes /1 No Would these GHG emissions result in a significant impact on the environment? Discuss below: ❑ Yes ® No Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Discuss below: The mane ement Ian would ultimate) result in lantin of 4 000 trees and would romote the health of the urban forest and would result in a net reduction or se uestration of GHG. If you checked "No" to all preceding questions or checked "Yes" and have provided the required Resource Studies and identified measures sufficient to protect all resource values the project maybe categorically exempt from further environmental review. Sign the Certification, below, and submit this Checklist with your application to the CAL FIRE, Urban Forestry Program office. CAL FIRE will review your responses and determine whether additional environmental review is necessary prior to project approval. Part 5: CERTIFICATION I certify that I have reviewed the proposed project's description and inspected the project site(s). I have provided accurate and factual responses to the questions and have supplied accurate information when requesting database searches. In my opinion the proposed project will not have any negative impacts on the environment. Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -urban and Community Forestry Page 9 of 10 _79_ Part 6: DETERMINATION DETERMINATION (To be completed by CAL FIRE, Urban and Community Forestry Program Staff) As a representative of CAL FIRE and as lead agency for environmental review under CEQA I have determined that an environmental impact evaluation for the proposed project has been satisfactorily completed. On the basis of this evaluation: I find that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment and meets the Class 4 (Minor Alterations to Land) categorical exemption requirements. This project is therefore exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents. CAL FIRE will prepare a Notice of Exemption (NOE). I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the environment and does not meet the Class 4 categorical exemption requirements; therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A mitigated negative declaration will be prepared. I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, and an environmental impact report is required. I find that the proposed project may have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An environmental impact report is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to an earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature of Authorized CAL FIRE Reviewer Print Name Title Date Environmental Checklist, CAL FIRE -Urban and Community Forestry Page 10 of 10 -80- 5. Budget Information A. Budget Detail - Provide a specific budget for work to be done. The budget should be based on bid quotes and/or estimates from vendors or on actual costs that will be incurred. The line items listed should be specific enough to adequately describe project expenses. Use the Excel format CAL FIRE has provided for your budget, and follow the guidance in the Procedural Guide. You should note that applicants, if successful in being awarded a grant, will have to follow this budget and will only have the opportunity for minor budget adjustments. The total amount of the project can not be changed later. B. Vendor List - List the vendors that have provided you quotes or estimates for this project. A. Total estimated project budget is $276,685. This includes CalFire grant funds in the amount of $250,285 and City match in the amount of $26,400. See detailed budget spreadsheet in Attachment D. B. Vendors Providing Estimates and Quotes: Dudek Associates Consulting, Urban Corps, California Surveying and Drafting C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Describe the basis for the budget amounts listed above. Applicants will be expected to adhere to this budget (Continued on next page). Refer to detailed budget included as Attachment D Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund Urban end Community Forestry Program - Project Bud City of National City Budget Proposal Description Cost Basis Cain,* 6sani Share Grantee Match Total Personnel: Salaries estimated @ 400 hrs ($85,000/yr) $42/hr X 400 hrs. 16800 Employee Benefits estimated @ 400 hrs $8.50/hrX40 hrs 3400 Subtotal 20200 20,200 Contractual: Tree Inventory Taskl:.Tree Mapping & Assesment 10,000 trees/4,000 vacant spaces $2/tree/space 28,000 'Task 27 Tree Data Assessments 40 hrs X $160/hr 6,400 Task 3:. iTree Evacuations 40 hrs. X $160/hr 6,400 Task 4: Tree Mgmt. Software (CalFire) Software license & fixed setup costs 20,000 Subtotal 60,800 60,800 Urban Forest Management Plan Task 1- Dept & Communey Meetings Task is -Kick off meeting/data acqulstion Task 1b-4 city meetings Task lc -2 community outreach meetings Task Id - 4-mid project meetings Subtotal 34,750 34,750 Task 2- UFMP Draft 1 Task 2a- Urban Forest Sytus Task 2b - Tree Management Policies Task 2c- Tree Inventory Management Task 2d- Tree Maintenance Program Task 2e- Tree Selection Task 2f- Tree removal and planting Task 2g- Stewardship and Community Outreach Task 2h- LT Goats and Objectives Task 2i- Dept Synergy Task 2j- Urban Forest Benefits Task 2k- Canopy Coverage Analysis Task 21- Urban Forest Program Funding Subtotal 46,685 46,685 Task 3- UFMP Draft 2 Subtotal 9040 9,040 -81- C. Explanation of Budget and Costs - Continued from previous page Tank 4- PowerpoiM Presentation to City Council Subtotal 5400 5,400 GHG Emission Tracking & Reporting Subtotal 2 yrs of reporting 32 hrs. X $160 5120 5,120 Tree Pocky/Ordinances Development Policy & ordinance review and modification 40 hrs. X $225 9000 City Meetings 3 meetings 12 hrs. X $225 2700 Subtotal 11,700 11,700 Wad based Forest Mgmt system & webslte update Providing comments to City Web MAster 24 hrs. X $225 5400 Review Web Based Forest Mgmt System 24 hrs. X $225 5400 Meetings 4 meetings 16 hrs. X$225 3600 Subtotal 14400 14,400 Travel mileage /5 miles round trip/ 18 mtgs 1,350 miles X .56/mile 1000 1000 Supplies repro, fuel, maps, tapes, ID books, other misc field and office 10000 10000 Equipment dataloggers, field eqpt, etc 7500 7500 Other Dkect Costs 25000 25000 Indirect Costs (10%) 16,690\ 6200 25,090 TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 250,285 26,400 276,685 PERCENT OF TOTAL GRANT PROJECT COST 90 10 100 D. Matching Funds - List other funding sources, grants, etc., that will meet grant matching requirements. Source 1'City of National City Description Amount $20,200 Employee salaries - $16,800; Employee benefits - $3,400 (see Attachment D) Source 2' Description Amount Source 3 Description Amount Source 4 ' Description Amount Matching funds comments -82- RESOLUTION NO. 2015 — RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY FOR FUNDING FROM THE URBAN AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM AS PROVIDED THROUGH THE GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTION FUND WHEREAS, the Governor of the State of California in cooperation with the California State Legislature has enacted State of California Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funding, both of which provide funds to the State of California and its political subdivisions for urban forestry programs; and WHEREAS, the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of the program within the State, setting up necessary procedures governing application by local agencies and non-profit organizations under the program, and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the State Department of Forestry and Fire Protection require the applicant to certify by resolution the approval of application before submission of said application to the State; and WHEREAS, the City of National City desires to enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out an urban forestry project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of National City: 1. Approved the filing of an application for "State Greenhouse Gas Reduction Funding and/or USDA Forest Service" urban forestry grant program funds; 2. Certifies that the City of National City has or will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project; 3. Certifies that funds under the jurisdiction of City Council of the City of National City are available to begin the project; 4. Certifies that the City of National City will expend grant funds prior to December 31, 2019; 5. Appoints the City Manager and City Engineer, as agents of the City Council of the City of National City to conduct all negotiations, execute, and submit all documents including, but not limited to applications, agreements, amendments, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project; Approved and adopted the 20th day of October, 2015. I, the undersigned, hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution, number 2015 — , was duly adopted by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Noes: Absent: Michael R. Dalla, City Clerk Notarized Seal: